Slashdot Mirror


Another Google Recruiting Technique

An anonymous reader writes "The new edition of Linux Journal has a special insert: The GLAT (Google Labs Aptitude Test) is a Google recruiting quiz presented as a spoof of standardised aptitude tests. It is filled with math and Google-related trivia."

430 comments

  1. High quality blogger. by nmoog · · Score: 5, Funny
    "It seems Google Labs is trying to attract some high quality people into their ranks. If only I was a software guy, I'd apply..."

    Nice modesty there Michael!
  2. google cache by kjamez · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    you can't have everything, where would you put it?
    1. Re:google cache by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Google cache doesn't have the images. The link basicly depends on the images to tell us what's going on.

      Slightly helpful, but we still need a mirror of the images.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    2. Re:google cache by ikkonoishi · · Score: 3, Informative
    3. Re:google cache by earthstar · · Score: 1

      This ACCOUNT Has Been SUSPENDED is what i get

  3. Can't Find It by christopherfinke · · Score: 5, Informative

    The original link is dead, the Coral cache is unresponsive, and Google apparently has no cache of it. However, I was able to find this page, which has a little more abot the test.

  4. hmmm by blool · · Score: 4, Insightful

    it sounds like because of bulk they arent reading the normal applications

  5. Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mirror, the site is already down. http://66.90.101.31/~whateve/mirror/

  6. I would... by snig64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    reply, but cruftbox.com has been /. already. :S I do hate standard aptitude tests, they are usually unrealistic and have nothing to do with what you have actually learned. Take the National Registry EMT tests, they are so "wordy" that you could pick any answer and be right in your head, but because of the one word, the answer is wrong. Anyone can tell you how to do the procedure, but picking the right answer from two right answers is a hard thing to do!

    --
    http://dont.spam.me.anymore.com
    1. Re:I would... by nmoog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I guess you didnt see the test, due to the slashdottin', but the google test is a lot more fun and includes a lot of subjective questions. (Like, how many colours would you need to fill a fuck-knows-a-hedron, and what colours would you choose?)

      They are testing your apptitude but also your character - your creativity, flair, and sense of humour.

    2. Re:I would... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If I have three apples and I take away one how many do I have?

      Two - Correct if you read 'take' as subtract from the original set.

      One - Correct. There were three apples in a set in some undefined state. I took ONE of them (away) and so therefore I have one.

      Three - Correct. I have (own) three apples. But 'taking one away' changes nothing. I own both the original two apples and the one I now have.

      The biggest part of passing verbal/written logic tests that are not expressed unambiguously as mathemnatical symbols is having the sense not to take them in the first place.

  7. It's in the Mensa Bulletin too. by Stile+65 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They've been putting puzzles on the inside front cover of the Mensa Bulletin for at least the past few months (I just joined). This month, the GLAT was stapled to the inside instead of the inside cover puzzles I'd been seeing.

    It actually has some neat questions. Lots of fun!

    --
    I claim first use of "Error No. 0B" - or "No. 0B error." It'll be the new ID 10T!
    1. Re:It's in the Mensa Bulletin too. by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      Maybe they will add Geena Davis to their board?

      (Davis is a member, never attends meetings however)

    2. Re:It's in the Mensa Bulletin too. by Stile+65 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Better yet, Asia Carrera is a member.

      Roar.

      --
      I claim first use of "Error No. 0B" - or "No. 0B error." It'll be the new ID 10T!
    3. Re:It's in the Mensa Bulletin too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Now, being the mensa-brain having guy that you are, do you see the unfairness of a "goods and services" tax? Or do you not care whether it's fair?

      If it is than you don't understand it, consider this: A person making $40K pays a huge percentage of his income on goods and services--say 75%, while a person with perhaps a $300K income might spend $60K on goods and services. So, now the rich guy is taxed on only 20% of his income and the nearly-poor guy is taxed on 75%.

      The richer people aren't going to choose to eat more meals (only slightly better ones), have many more shoes (maybe a pair or two), etc.

      It's not about how one chooses to spend.

    4. Re:It's in the Mensa Bulletin too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't this the kind of elitest hanky panky that you open source pundits hate so very very much. Wouldn't you rather know what is going on, document it to death and plaster it about as the gospel of computerdom. Perhaps even write a HOWTO guide to teach a moron (me) to get a job their?

    5. Re:It's in the Mensa Bulletin too. by dustinbarbour · · Score: 1

      Yeah.. I got it, too. Apparently they know where to go to recruit, eh?

    6. Re:It's in the Mensa Bulletin too. by JamesOfTheDesert · · Score: 0, Redundant
      So, now the rich guy is taxed on only 20% of his income and the nearly-poor guy is taxed on 75%.

      This is going to sound like a troll, but ...

      Why should people who have more, pay more?

      It's off-topic, etc., but I'm curious if anyone can answer this without using subjective, ambigious words such as "fair" or "just," because it seems that the general "explanation" for paying taxes as a percentage of income is, "Well, that's only fair." Which explains nothing.

      --

      Java is the blue pill
      Choose the red pill
    7. Re:It's in the Mensa Bulletin too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should people who have more, pay more?

      Because they get more from the status quo, so should pay more to keep it going. The opportunity to walk down the street without worrying about being mugged. Your wife and kids able to go about town with needing armored vehicles and escort full of paid thugs to prevent kidnapping.

      Sound farfetched? I just described life in Mexico for those with wealth in the 90+% range.

    8. Re:It's in the Mensa Bulletin too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod the guy up. It's in her FAQ. Notice she's quite the techie-geek, and has been very involved with her web site for many years. Quite the impressive business woman. A company I was once with tried to reach her regarding doing a trade-show-demo video clip, but her agent turned it down.

    9. Re:It's in the Mensa Bulletin too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And a great quote from Asia's FAQ:
      Are you ever going to finish college?

      Maybe, maybe not.
      ...
      While many people will take courses for HTML, Photoshop, and other computer-related skills, I've been blessed with the ability and determination to learn it all on my own, with the aid of some good books, and a lot of trial and error. :)
      She even sounds like a /. geek. I hope google hires her.
    10. Re:It's in the Mensa Bulletin too. by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      Why should people who have more, pay more?

      Contributing each additional marginal dollar hurts those with more less than it hurts those with less.

      The people with more have earned (or inherited, or stolen) their more in the context of a legal and enforcement framework provided by the government, and consequently their obligation to that system is greater.

      In the absence of their contributions, the system will be unable to perform its functions and the context in which they gained and maintain their wealth will disappear. It's the same as insurance - you pay more to insure a $100,000 Maserati than a $50 ten-speed bike.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    11. Re:It's in the Mensa Bulletin too. by cft_128 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It's off-topic, etc., but I'm curious if anyone can answer this without using subjective, ambigious words such as "fair" or "just," because it seems that the general "explanation" for paying taxes as a percentage of income is, "Well, that's only fair." Which explains nothing.

      I'm not expert (never stopped me from posting before) and someone else can probalbly put the better, but IMO the short answer is that it is better for society as a whole. For example if we do not have an education system that every can use then society loses (yes, we have a poor education system, but it is still leaps and bounds better than say Sudan's). Poor people cannot pay for all of it on their own. Same with crime fighting. If people cannot get educated, they have a much harder time making a living wage, if they cannot make a living wage, crime can rise.

      Public health, crime fighting, firefighting and the military are also other areas that benefit the whole society.

      I ran across this idea recently (well actually a long time ago but have not really thought about it much) and am still turning it over in my head, here is the basic argument: the rich get more from the government. Where are all the good public schools? In the good neighborhoods. Who got the most money from the S&L bailouts? Who is more likely to get a robbery investigated, a person living in an aparment or a mansion? The poeple with larger deposits. Corporations also get quite a bit of money in subsidies from the government too, and poor people are not in the habit of running those. Related to this, rich people also control more of the government (how many poor people have a really good lobbyist, or the last senator that was living in a studio aparment and drove a 1986 tercel).

      Poor people do get benefit from government. In 1995 (these are what I had on hand) they gave about $116 billion to the poor (medicaid, AFDC, Food stamps, housing subsidies, school lunch, head start, etc). That is only about 8% of the whole budget. 8% is also what was spent on corporate subsidies (farm subsidies, S&L and bank rescues, export/import assistance, tax credits, reimbursement for advertising, etc.)

      --

      Underloved Movies and Pub Quiz: donotquestionme.org

    12. Re:It's in the Mensa Bulletin too. by reverius · · Score: 1

      at the very least, people who have more should pay the -same amount- proportionally.

      i don't think anybody's going to suggest that the rich pay less, as a percentage of their income, than the poor... that's a broken economic system, aside from being "unfair" or whatever.

      however, this is exactly what is being proposed through the tax on goods and services rather than income.

      if the poor pay more as a percentage of their income than the rich, then the government programs that are being distributed evenly across the population are being gotten for cheaper by the rich than the poor. this is a bypass of capitalism, and a way for (effectively) those who pay less in tax to "steal" by getting things more cheaply than they would be in a market system.

      the government provides goods and services to all (such as roads, energy subsidies, parks, and schools), for free (not really, it's tax money), and unless that is going to change, then it's not a good idea to implement an unbalanced tax system in which some individuals pay more or less than others.

      right now, the tax system is such that the rich pay more, as a percentage of their income, than the poor... that isn't exactly fair either, but it's seen by most as a way to rectify the "unfair" (extremely slanted, if you look at a graph) distribution of wealth in the first place.

      the reason it doesn't make sense to have the poor person pay the same amount in actual dollars as the rich is that the government wouldn't be able to bring in even 1/10 of its tax money that way. not even close. unless you want to put the poor in debt (like they're not already, but that's another story) by taxing them more than they have (it's been tried, it definitely doesn't work, lol)...

    13. Re:It's in the Mensa Bulletin too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAH-HAH! He complained about "elitests"!
      I love it when that happens.

      You might get a job "their" after all. They probably need someone to come up with more insane misspellings for their "Did you mean [alternate spelling]?" function.

    14. Re:It's in the Mensa Bulletin too. by Stile+65 · · Score: 1

      For that, I will refer you to the FairTax FAQ. The short explanation is that there's a "prebate" equal to the taxes that would be paid on spending up to the poverty level, to make the tax progressive and make it so that those who earn/spend less pay no (or negative) taxes. In addition, used goods are not taxed; therefore, those who wish to can lessen their taxes this way as well (especially on things like cars and homes).

      --
      I claim first use of "Error No. 0B" - or "No. 0B error." It'll be the new ID 10T!
    15. Re:It's in the Mensa Bulletin too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      at the very least, people who have more should pay the -same amount- proportionally.
      i don't think anybody's going to suggest that the rich pay less, as a percentage of their income, than the poor... that's a broken economic system, aside from being "unfair" or whatever.

      Well, actually, that was the question being asked asked: Why should people who have more should pay the -same amount- proportionally?

    16. Re:It's in the Mensa Bulletin too. by 2short · · Score: 1


      Why should people who have more be allowed to continue having more at all? Why shouldn't those with less just take it away from them?

      I'm guessing your answer to this is going to make some reference to the words "fair" or "just".

    17. Re:It's in the Mensa Bulletin too. by reverius · · Score: 1

      well, i answered that in the reply, though admittedly not well.

      those who make more have more, and those who have more benefit more from government services. take, for example, schools. a hypothetical rich person and poor person each have two kids. they send their kids to public school, and so far the rich person has paid quite a bit more dollars for this privilege. the poor person's kids, having been to school, become productive members of society (or more productive than they would have been) 10-15 years later. the rich person benefits (through returns on investments in society) from the effect that the school has on society more than he could have possibly benefited from sending any children there (financially speaking).

      it's in the best interest of the rich to keep society functioning (well). no single rich person can afford (literally) to have the schools in this country cease to function as a whole, or to have roads not work.

      the poor person could probably care less. they're not invested financially in society. chances are, they're barely surviving day to day, and all they really need is food, water, and shelter.

    18. Re:It's in the Mensa Bulletin too. by Linux+is+shit · · Score: 0

      Erm, the rich actually get LESS out of the system, but pay more. They are far less likely to use public healthcare, public education, they don't get any benefits or handouts. They pay more but get less. That's obscene. Income tax should be capped at 5k or so. Any shortfalls can be sorted out by abolishing all benefits and the NHS.

      --
      Linux will succeed on the desktop the day you don't need the CLI to install a driver.
  8. /. References? by globalar · · Score: 1

    The relation of things on GLAT also discussed or thrown out on /. instantly struck me. Not that these are unique to /., but I rarely come across them in one package.

    Algorithmic haiku, "what's wrong with Unix", text adventures (the "it's 2PM... what do you do?" question and the maze one), ruminations on optimal team size, coolest hack ever, what's the next big thing for Google, a snide reference to the .com bubble, and a few math questions.

    I got mine in DDJ, not one in CUJ though.

  9. Admit it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This was just an excuse to say you're in Mensa.

    1. Re:Admit it by Stile+65 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Of course! I've always wanted a bunch of people I don't know to look at their screens and say "Wow, that guy's in Mensa." Who knows, maybe I can score a girlfriend off Slashdot!

      --
      I claim first use of "Error No. 0B" - or "No. 0B error." It'll be the new ID 10T!
    2. Re:Admit it by daft_one · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, you do seem to realize you can't score a girlfriend ON slashdot... Maybe you really are in Mensa!

    3. Re:Admit it by Red+Pointy+Tail · · Score: 1


      MENSA's cut-off is about the top 2 percentile. In a country of say 250 million, there would be 5 million eligible. Honestly, I don't think it is that big a deal.

    4. Re:Admit it by glk572 · · Score: 0

      amen

      --
      Well art is art isn't it, but then again water is water; and east is east; and west is west; and if you take cranberries
    5. Re:Admit it by ajna · · Score: 5, Interesting

      For those wishing to find organizations more stringent in their requirements than Mensa (pages all from :

      TOPS (99th percentile, which apparently equates to a 1360 on the SAT, which is surprisingly low)
      One in a thousand society (99.9th, ~1520 on the SAT), all the way to the Giga society which demands with a straight face an IQ of 196 or higher to join.

      Ok, I'm tired of providing links. Look a few pagefuls down on this page http://www.eskimo.com/~miyaguch/hoeflin.html and you'll see that such societies are both in abundance and have widely varying selection criteria. I qualify for most - but certainly not all! - of those societies purely on academic test scores (haven't been IQ tested since I was a youth) but don't see the point of them and don't feel like going through the trouble of specialized "entrance exams". I can stroke my ego myself, thank you very much, and defining any of my life strictly on "how smart I am" vs. "what I have accomplished" or "what am I in the process of accomplishing" would be counterproductive imo.

    6. Re:Admit it by ajna · · Score: 1

      Apparently even with my self-professed superlative scores ;-) I can't format or proofread a post correctly. Please ignore "(pages all from".

    7. Re:Admit it by tsm_sf · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, if you really need to feel good about yourself why not try volunteering in your community. Opportunities are not limited to feeding scabby victims of Reagan.

      If you need to feel superior to your fellow man, just turn on the TV for a bit. I'd recommend 10 minutes of "ElimiDate".

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    8. Re:Admit it by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      One in a thousand society (99.9th, ~1520 on the SAT)
      I think this one is a joke played by members of the Giga Society on their intellectual inferiors. If you look at the One In A Thousand Society's web page, you'll see that "membership" requires you to send $30 off to some random guy at a P.O. box in New York City. And doing that would constitute irrevocable evidence of being an idiot.
      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    9. Re:Admit it by ajna · · Score: 1

      I agree that the concept of sending dues to a random PO Box is shady, but the 1520 mark is not too far removed from the 99th percentile reality in the eyes of the College Board, at least for 2003: http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/about/n ews_info/cbsenior/yr2003/pdf/table_3b.pdf.

    10. Re:Admit it by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


      It's more fun to say I'd qualify for Mensa, but am not interested in being in a group of elitest "thinkers".

      There are those that do,
      and there are those that think about doing.
      I'm happier doing.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    11. Re:Admit it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scoring in the 99th percentile on the SAT I does not equate to scoring in the 99th percentile on a standardized IQ tests. Most organizations will not accept SAT I scores for membership because of this.

    12. Re:Admit it by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      Let me get this straight - you read slashdot, but you *arent't* in Mensa?

      How horribly disadvantaged you are! How do you ever manage to cope?

      Being a member of Mensa is merely the process of passing a stupid test and paying a small fee...

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    13. Re:Admit it by Y2 · · Score: 1
      MENSA's cut-off is about the top 2 percentile. In a country of say 250 million, there would be 5 million eligible. Honestly, I don't think it is that big a deal.

      In a sense you are right - the vast majority of those who attempt the entrance test do pass it, and a lot of the people you know may already have qualifying scores on some other test. However, since only a small fraction of the eligible population joins any "Hi-IQ" group, the groups more exclusive than Mensa tend to be awfully small. If you're joining just to say you qualified, pick any. If you want to actually meet some reasonable people (yes, and a few amusing twits too), check out your local Mensa chapter. http://us.mensa.org/local_groups/find_region.php

      --
      "But all your emitter and collector are belong to me!"
    14. Re:Admit it by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      I dunno, the TOPS http://www.toponesociety.com/ and the One-in-a-thousand http://www.oathsociety.com/ seem a little fishy to me.

      They were founded by the same guy. They both use the same webserver, and are virtual hosted by the same domain (http://www.valueweb.net/), and both have pretty cheesy webpages with the same redirect from the default index page to a /pages/1/index.htm and they both have the same "web designer" in the HTML source -- Lynwood H. Moore Jr. Plus, its just a pet peeve of mine when people cant spell HTML :)

      Also, the membership does not seem that difficult. Any reasonably bright person/educated can get one of the required scores on at least one of the tests (at least for the TOPS, the scores for the OIAT are a little tougher).

      Hey, if you send me $30, I'll give you a piece of paper that will say anything you want :)

    15. Re:Admit it by ajna · · Score: 1

      You are correct, of course. The few organizations I cited do accept SAT scores, however. The problem comes up that the SAT measures both aptitude and basic knowledge: I took the SAT 4 times, at age 10, 11, 15, 16 and my scores went up each time, which shouldn't have happened had the SAT been purely measuring aptitude. (Incidentally why I took it so many times and at a young age is because other groups such as EPGY and SET, more purely academic, do still use the SAT to screen youth for their programs).

    16. Re:Admit it by glassgnost · · Score: 1

      You want to impress people? Try this on for size: Upon realizing that they can't revoke my I.Q., I just laminated the card and stopped paying $50 a year for a lousy magazine subscription...

    17. Re:Admit it by Kehvarl · · Score: 1

      Ewww. You mean actually associate with and help the human creatures in my community? That has about as much appeal as communing with cockroaches. Thank you, but I'll keep my dses of humanity down to bearable levels.

    18. Re:Admit it by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      all the way to the Giga society which demands with a straight face an IQ of 196 or higher to join.

      Good luck testing for IQ 196. I had to take the 'standardized' IQ test (whichever is recognized by the relevant professional society) at one point, and I can tell you the grading scale tops out at 160. The guy scoring mine just went that far and stopped.

      "The point is", he explained, "you're smart enough. That's all we're trying to determine here." He later figured out I don't learn very well by auditory methods - when you're in a College that subscribes to the theory that the only way to learn a language is to drop you in a classroom and have people start shouting at you in a foreign language it gets to be relevant.

      Another warning: if anyone "subcribes" to any method of teaching being the One True Way - run like hell.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    19. Re:Admit it by ajna · · Score: 1

      Again this is another great point. Standard IQ tests have very little discrimination at the top of their ranges. This is why there's a cottage industry of people like Hoeflin who push their own tests, which naturally have score ranges well up into the stratosphere (where the authors are by their own definition, of course :-/).

    20. Re:Admit it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I've never taken an IQ test, so I can't really say for sure. However, in school, I regularly scored in the top percentile on tests such as the SAT, the PSAT, the ACT, and the Iowa Basics. It's possible I might qualify.

  10. Been doing this in Mensa mags for a while. by Leviathant · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My wife's in Mensa, and one of the best things about that are the Google ads that generally take up the inside front page or two. It's a nice brain tease, and while I'm pretty sure I had a few of them figured out, I never sent them in because I like how Google hires PhDs, and I'd worry about being in over my head. I was disappointed when I didn't see any ad in the first page of this past month's Mensa mag, but overjoyed when I found the GLAT. Then I was a little intimidated. Still, I might sit and work it out one of these days, when I come up with the time for it. (As opposed to, say, killing time posting on Slashdot.)

    --
    I am Leviathant and I approve this message.
    1. Re:Been doing this in Mensa mags for a while. by dzelenka · · Score: 1

      It snagged me. I spent ~14 hours finishing it. Didn't solve all of them, but didn't cheat. After all that I had to send it in. Haven't gotten a phone cal yet...

      --
      Bah!
    2. Re:Been doing this in Mensa mags for a while. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't gotten a phone cal yet...

      Perhaps you didn't spell check your test?

      Sorry, couldn't resist.

    3. Re:Been doing this in Mensa mags for a while. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I advise against being intimidated by the qualifications of those with doctoral level qualifications... most will tell you that the difference between the qualified and the unqualified is that, for most, those with PhDs have proved that they are willing to work on tedious fruitless projects for at least 3 years. Any intelligent employer should make offers based upon ability, enthusiasm and experience - academic qualifications only serve as a vague indicator.

      That said, I've always wondered if the real test of intelligence in Mensa-style tests was to weed out those who were bright enough to see the futility in such trivia... I've always found there are plenty of puzzles and problems to solve without the need for contrived mental 'pissing contests'.

    4. Re:Been doing this in Mensa mags for a while. by BubbleNOP · · Score: 1

      I suppose getting a PhD, which is usually a tedious 4+ year project, is an accident then? I agree that academic qualifications are not a foolproof indicator of one's suitability for a job, but for risky research work (I bet Google has lots of it) they are a strong indicator of likelihood of perseverance and success. I don't have a PhD, but I wish I had one.

  11. GLAT - sample questions by hajmola · · Score: 5, Informative
    Google Labs Aptitude Test:

    Solve this cryptic equation, realizing of course that values for M and E could be interchanged. No leading zeroes are allowed.
    WWWDOT - GOOGLE = DOTCOM

    Write a haiku describing possible methods for predicting search traffic seasonality.

    What's the next line?
    1
    1 1
    2 1
    1 2 1 1
    1 1 1 2 2 1

    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike. There is a dusty laptop here with a weak wireless connection. There are dull, lifeless gnomes strolling about. What dost thou do?
    A) Wander aimlessly, bumping into obstacles until you are eaten by a grue.
    B) Use the laptop as a digging device to tunnel to the next level.
    C) Play MPoRPG until the battery dies along with your hopes.
    D) Use the computer to map the nodes of the maze and discover an exit path.
    E) Email your resume to Google, tell the lead gnome you quit and find yourself in a whole different world

    What's broken with Unix? How would you fix it?

    On your first day at Google, you discover that your cubicle mate wrote the textbook you used as a primary resource in your first year of graduate school. Do you:
    A) Fawn obsequiously and ask if you can have an autograph.
    B) Sit perfectly still and use only soft keystrokes to avoid disturbing her concentration
    C) Leave her daily offerings of granola and English toffee from the food bins.
    D) Quote your favorite formula from the textbook and explain how it's now your mantra.
    E) Show her how example 17b could have been solved with 34 fewer lines of code.

    Which of the following expresses Google's over-arching philosophy?
    A) "I'm feeling lucky"
    B) "Don't be evil"
    C) "Oh, I already fixed that"
    D) "You should never be more than 50 feet from food"
    E) All of the above

    How many different ways can you color an icosahedron with one of three colors on each face?

    What colors would you choose?

    This space is intentionally blank. Please fill it with something that improves upon emptiness.

    On an infinite, two-dimensional, rectangular lattice of 1-ohm resistors, what is the resistance between two nodes that are a knight's move away?

    It's 2pm on a sunny Sunday afternoon in the Bay Area. You're minutes from the Pacific Ocean, redwood forest hiking trails and world class cultural attractions. What do you do?

    In your opinion, what is the most beautiful math equation ever derived?

    Which of the following is NOT an actual interest group formed by Google employees?
    A) Women's basketball
    B) Buffy fans
    C) Cricketeers
    D) Nobel winners
    E) Wine club

    What will be the next great improvement in search technology?

    What is the optimal size of a project team, above which additional members do not contribute productivity equivalent to the percentage increase in the staff size? A) 1 B) 3 C) 5 D) 11 E) 24

    Given a triangle ABC, how would you use only a compass and straight edge to find a point P such that triangles ABP, ACP, and BCP have equal perimeters? (Assume that ABC is constructed so that a solution does exist.)

    Consider a function which, for a given whole number n, returns the number of ones required when writing out all numbers between 0 and n. For example, f(13) = 6. Notice that f(1) = 1. What is the next largest n such that f(n) = n?

    What's the coolest hack you've ever written?

    'Tis known in refined company, that choosing K things out of N can be done in ways as many as choosing N minus K from N: I pick K, you the remaining. Find though a cooler bijection, where you show a knack uncanny, of making your choises contain all K of mine. Oh, for pedantry: let K be no more than half N.

    What number comes next in the sequence: 10, 9, 60, 90, 70, 66, ?
    A) 96
    B) 10 to the 100th power
    C) Either of the above
    D) None of the above

    In 29 words or fewer, describe what you would strive to accomplish if you worked at Google Labs.

    1. Re:GLAT - sample questions by bitingduck · · Score: 2, Informative

      Same one showed up in Physics Toady this month, too.

    2. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Daniel+Ellard · · Score: 5, Funny
      On your first day at Google, you discover that your cubicle mate wrote the textbook you used as a primary resource in your first year of graduate school. Do you:

      F: Wonder why you have a PhD and you're still sharing a cubicle like a code monkey.

      --
      Disclaimer: I work for a company, but I don't speak for them.
    3. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're hired!

    4. Re:GLAT - sample questions by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      In your opinion, what is the most beautiful math equation ever derived?

      2 + 2 = 4

      But I'm a big 1984 fan.

    5. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 5, Funny
      In 29 words or fewer, describe what you would strive to accomplish if you worked at Google Labs.
      "Need laid. Prefer geek but chic chick who doesn't mind Searching and doesn't oppose Groups. Tight on cash, she must be Froogle. I want to create porn.google.com."
      --
      "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
    6. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      In 29 words or fewer, describe what you would strive to accomplish if you worked at Google Labs.

      Profit

    7. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Meneudo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Heh... this one reminds me of something from KOTOR...
      1
      1 1
      2 1
      1 2 1 1
      1 1 1 2 2 1

      one
      one one
      two ones
      one two, one one
      one one, one two, two ones
      three ones, two twos, one one
      312211

      --
      ...
    8. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      On your first day at Google, you discover that your cubicle mate wrote the textbook you used as a primary resource in your first year of graduate school. Do you:

      F: Wonder why you have a PhD and you're still sharing a cubicle like a code monkey.
      Wonder why your cubicle mate gets to be the one on the ground
    9. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pssst....

      42

    10. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Negative+Response · · Score: 2, Informative

      199981

    11. Re:GLAT - sample questions by seanadams.com · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I typed out a few more lines and immedaitely noticed the following:

      1) you can obviously never have a digit over 3
      2) if you right-justify the numbers you immediately see many 2d structures, as well as periodicity to each column, but the way the pattern changes from one col to the next is not obvious
      3) if you sum each row, or look at the differences in sums between rows, there are even more patterns... is there a fibonacci sequence buried in there? will have to spend some more time on this one. :)

    12. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How many different ways can you color an icosahedron with one of three colors on each face?

      What colors would you choose?


      3 ways. And I'd prefer either red on each face, blue on each face, or green on each face ;)

    13. Re:GLAT - sample questions by chickenwing · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Whenever I hear about Google recruiting, it kind of depresses me. Reminds me of something Jamie Zawinski said:
      you can divide our industry into two kinds of people: those who want to go work for a company to make it successful, and those who want to go work for a successful company. Netscape's early success and rapid growth caused us to stop getting the former and start getting the latter.
    14. Re:GLAT - sample questions by seanadams.com · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Very interesting things happen if you try it in binary, i.e. 111100 -> 1001100

      I'd post the results but I haven't the patience to circumvent the lameness filters.

    15. Re:GLAT - sample questions by TrashGod · · Score: 1

      Q. What's broken with Unix? How would you fix it?

      A. Current version needs work. Edit, compile, test, commit, repeat.

    16. Re:GLAT - sample questions by rasafras · · Score: 1

      ...and realizing that I had just counted to make sure he had 29 reaffirmed my nerdiness.

    17. Re:GLAT - sample questions by the_greywolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      for f(1):

      0, 1

      the number 1 is written once.

      for f(13):

      0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13

      there are 6 ones: 1 from each of 1, 10, 12, 13, and two from 11, for a total of 6.

      --
      grey wolf
      LET FORTRAN DIE!
    18. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Write a perl script that counts the number of ones in a number, and run it up. At least, that's what I did...

    19. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Lord+Crc · · Score: 1

      Heh... this one reminds me of something from KOTOR...
      1
      1 1
      2 1
      1 2 1 1
      1 1 1 2 2 1


      Its also one of the "puzzles" in the new Sherlock Holmes game.

    20. Re:GLAT - sample questions by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      I believe it was one of the puzzles that Bob Morris showed to Cliff Stoll. See "The Cuckoo's Egg".

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    21. Re:GLAT - sample questions by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Can someone clarify on the knight's move problem? Being a comp engr student and taking some EE courses as well I think I know how to solve it, I just can't visualize it properly.

      With the chess reference what I'm seeing in my head is a chessboard where all the edges of the squares have a 1Ohm resistor. If that's the case, a knight's move is an actual square, not an edge, that's the part that's confusing me

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    22. Re:GLAT - sample questions by servognome · · Score: 5, Funny

      Write a haiku describing possible methods for predicting search traffic seasonality.
      Ice Cream in Summer
      Football in fall and winter
      Porn for all seasons

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    23. Re:GLAT - sample questions by nmoog · · Score: 3, Funny

      Q. What's broken with Unix?
      A. Their penis.

    24. Re:GLAT - sample questions by ploppy · · Score: 1

      Personally I prefer G:

      G: Wonder why you have a PhD, got offered a job at Google, but have instead spent 2 1/2 months unemployed after rejecting them. I get the impression I seriously f*cked up somewhere.

    25. Re:GLAT - sample questions by dspeyer · · Score: 1

      You can probably get it by thinking about powers of ten and small multiples thereof (and then doing the last bit by hand), but even a slow computer can brute-force it in under a second using 20 lines of C code. I wonder which approach Google prefers?

    26. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      croftbox.com original scans are mirrored on http://seriot.ch/GLAT.

    27. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "
      Which of the following is NOT an actual interest group formed by Google employees?
      A) Women's basketball
      B) Buffy fans
      C) Cricketeers
      D) Nobel winners
      E) Wine club
      "

      I know this one, it's a trick question! The answer is A, simply because on the entire planet not one person actually is interested in women's basketball!

    28. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jamie Zawinski reminds me of something I once thought..

      you can divide former software giants into two kinds of people: people who continue to write great software and obviously love doing that, and people who go run a nightclub in San Francisco instead.

    29. Re:GLAT - sample questions by K-Man · · Score: 4, Funny
      One of the draft questions that didn't make it to publication:

      Q: How many perfect 10's will you find at a Google party?

      A: One, followed by a hundred zeroes.

      --
      ---- "If we have to go on with these damned quantum jumps, then I'm sorry that I ever got involved" - Erwin Schrodinger
    30. Re:GLAT - sample questions by K-Man · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately he's not the first person to recognize the phenomenon. IBM was similarly full of fools when it tanked in the early 90's, and I doubt if I was the first to notice. My father might have been, but he wasn't very forthcoming about it :-).

      --
      ---- "If we have to go on with these damned quantum jumps, then I'm sorry that I ever got involved" - Erwin Schrodinger
    31. Re:GLAT - sample questions by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      #include<stdio.h>

      int main(){
      int num=2;
      char buffer[100];
      int count=1;
      int x;

      while(1){
      sprintf(buffer,"%i",num);
      while(buffer[x]){
      if(buffer[x]=='1'){
      count++;
      }
      }
      if(count==num)
      break;
      num++;
      }
      }

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    32. Re:GLAT - sample questions by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Think of the nodes (where the resistors meet) as the squares. Moving from any 1 node to another (one square to another) requires crossing a resistor.

      It can't be solved via series-parallel expansion, the easiest way I can think of is to use Thevenin equivalence. I know ts an infinite series, I'm just not sure if it converges or not.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    33. Re:GLAT - sample questions by mshurpik · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Whenever I hear about Google recruiting, it depresses me because Google doesn't seem to understand that Geek Chic is over.

      I say you can divide this industry into two kinds of people: those who want to hold down a job and have a life, and those who want their job to BE their life. Google is looking for the latter.

    34. Re:GLAT - sample questions by cubicledrone · · Score: 4, Funny

      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike. There is a dusty laptop here with a weak wireless connection. There are dull, lifeless gnomes strolling about. What dost thou do?

      Schedule a meeting about process improvement and try to horseshit my way into a middle management position so I can wedge my fat ass into a molded chair and order from the salad bar.

      Which of the following expresses Google's over-arching philosophy?

      Make people jump through hoops to get a temp job.

      How many different ways can you color an icosahedron with one of three colors on each face?

      This has anything at all to do with being qualified for a job?

      What colors would you choose?

      Gray, to match the cubicle.

      On an infinite, two-dimensional, rectangular lattice of 1-ohm resistors, what is the resistance between two nodes that are a knight's move away?

      Lab rat.

      It's 2pm on a sunny Sunday afternoon in the Bay Area. You're minutes from the Pacific Ocean, redwood forest hiking trails and world class cultural attractions. What do you do?

      Go back to the want ads so I can find a job where I don't have to be tormented by obscure questions before the food runs out.

      In your opinion, what is the most beautiful math equation ever derived?

      Paycheck - expenses = savings

      What will be the next great improvement in search technology?

      Finding a job.

      What is the optimal size of a project team, above which additional members do not contribute productivity equivalent to the percentage increase in the staff size? A) 1 B) 3 C) 5 D) 11 E) 24

      According to middle management, whatever increases the budget.

      In 29 words or fewer, describe what you would strive to accomplish if you worked at Google Labs.

      Nothing, because the moment anyone "strives" for anything other than the donut list in the modern workplace, they get fired.

      Glad to see companies are slowly making the process of building a career a game show.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    35. Re:GLAT - sample questions by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sharing an office/cubicle (well, assuming the thing is large enough) with someone working on the same project is great. It lets you bounce ideas off the other person and visa versa.

    36. Re:GLAT - sample questions by CondeZer0 · · Score: 1

      Q. What's broken with Unix? How would you fix it?

      That is an easy one, one word and a single digit number: Plan 9

      Having in mind that Rob Pike and a few other Plan 9 developers now work at Google, I wonder if they had anything to do with this question...

      There has been some speculation among Plan 9 fans about what the hell is Rob doing at Google, aside from some small contributions to the Plan 9 on Unix project no one knows what he is working on... I hope that some day we will all get to find out ;)

      --
      "When in doubt, use brute force." Ken Thompson
    37. Re:GLAT - sample questions by DegreeOfFreedom · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is called the Look and Say Sequence. John H. Conway, creator of the Game of Life (the cellular automaton, not the board game), has studied this sequence extensively, including the sequences resulting from starting with digits besides 1.

    38. Re:GLAT - sample questions by King+Babar · · Score: 1
      Solve this cryptic equation, realizing of course that values for M and E could be interchanged. No leading zeroes are allowed. WWWDOT - GOOGLE = DOTCOM

      Ah, this takes me back to my CMU days. :-)

      The stipulation about leading zeros, plus the fact that zero never causes a carry so that x - 0 = x means that nothing but L could be zero. Inspection indicates that L can't be anything but zero, so: L = 0.

      Because no two letters can have the same value, and because W > G (first column), W > 2. Trying W=3 creates a problem because 3 - G = D, so G and D are 1, and 2 respectively except then C is also 1. (Trying G and D the other way also gets you stuck on the W - 0 column later.) Trying W=4 creates a simliar problem because G and D become 1 and 3 respectively, giving you C=2 but then 0 = 2. Spotting the problem with low values for W, but also seeing that W cannot be 9 or 8 since at least one of the two subtractions of W-0 must generate a borrow (logic omitted), you now try W=7. Since that meens 0 > 7, you try 0 = 8; that gives you the values T = 9 while G and D are 5 and 1, so C = 4 and M = 3. Nothing = 2.

      So 777589 - 188106 = 589483

      Herb Simon would have been amused that somebody was using cryptarithmetic in a job interview situation.

      --

      Babar

    39. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you get slashcode to let you indent things so well. I had pretty much the same approach as you, but couldn't get the formatting right. (which is why google should hire you instead of me)

    40. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's merely you that don't understand that it is NOT over. Doing what you enjoy for a living is nice. Success is also nice. I'm sorry you don't understand this. I find it very sad to think of all those people who spend 1/3 of their lives doing a job they don't like.

    41. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rec.puzzles FAQ has great hints for that one. usenet is your friend.

    42. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The right answer is "spell creat() with an e"
      - Ken Thompson: [When asked what he would do differently if starting UNIX over again. Note that in Plan 9, `creat" _is_ spelled with an E.]

    43. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Zen+Punk · · Score: 1

      Who modded this troll? It's a pun, asshat.

      --
      Sleep is futile.
    44. Re:GLAT - sample questions by AuMatar · · Score: 2, Informative

      See the list box next to the preview button? Change it to code.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    45. Re:GLAT - sample questions by WhytTiger · · Score: 1

      Well, how I did it, I used excel... split the number into each of it's digits and ran it down as far as I could... adding all of the digits and keeping a running sum (Don't do a complete sum on every line, your computer will yack, just run that to the bottom, once there, start again in a new column(s) until you get the answer. I came out with 199971 by doing it using this method... very brute force, but graphing it is also interesting... seeing the nature of this function
      God I'm a dork

      --
      My Sig Beat up your Honor Roll Sig
    46. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks!

    47. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Basje · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sorry to hear that you're stuck in a job you don't like. OTOH, if it were possible to have a job you actually liked, with co-workers you can relate to, you probably wouldn't that be that cynical. And if you were less cynical you might just find that.

      Most geeks are ridiculed by people who cannot understand our way of thinking. It would be a nice change to be in an environment where that was not so. Google understands that. They created an environment where geeks thrive. Now they are expanding, and are attempting to keep that environment functional. It's their basis of success.

      --
      the pun is mightier than the sword
    48. Re:GLAT - sample questions by kruczkowski · · Score: 1

      You know, I would have said the same, but I would have chosen it for simplicity - it's the first eq. that you learn at school and the most popular one. Not something like e^(i*pi)+1=0, that is just something to show off with. Or E=mcc, ask those people what the C is for.

      --
      hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
    49. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good stuff, except you need to initialize and increment x in the loop.

      I actually whipped it up in python to find the answer. I was pretty surprised how much slower it ran actually. The p2-300 I used took 13 seconds or so in python...0.7 seconds in C.

    50. Re:GLAT - sample questions by amorsen · · Score: 1

      99 zeroes. 10^1 is 10 followed by zero zeroes. 10^100 is 10 followed by 99 zeroes. Please hand over your geek card.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    51. Re:GLAT - sample questions by ambrosen · · Score: 1

      Eh? One, followed by 99 zeroes, surely.

    52. Re:GLAT - sample questions by amorsen · · Score: 2, Informative

      It doesn't take long to realize that the resistance must be above 0 (since just getting one move away from the initial node costs you at least 1/4 Ohm). An upper bound consists of the two paths of length 3 Ohm, for a 3/2 Ohm total.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    53. Re:GLAT - sample questions by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Bah, the testers will find that bug in QA :) Thats what I get for posting without actually building.

      I'm not surprised Python was slower than C, but 20x surprises me. On the rare occasion I've used Python (I don't like it, but thats another topic), I noticed that explicitly casting varibles helped. One app was supposed to parse files with lists of numbers and sort them, explicitly casting the input to be integers rather than letting it guess types gave a huge speedup (of course, part of this was because storing them as strings went over the 512 MB of RAM and had my machine thrashing). Its worth a shot.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    54. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm most intrigued by the "cubicle mate" question - where my first impression is that I am offended by all the answers. A suggests I'm a simpering fool; B suggests I have an inferiority complex; C suggests I'm a feeble waste of space; D suggests I brown-nose; E suggests I'm an arrogant tit. There is no good answer - where is the "Hi - you wrote textbook X didn't you? I used that. I'm grabbing myself a coffee - would you like one? Milk and sugar?"

      I've an issue with the project team size question too. If I pick any of those answers I'm wrong. The correct answer is (A) 1 as where one capable and motivated person is able to work on a problem alone they will achieve more per hour as there is no overhead of communication. Unfortunately, or maybe rather fortunately, most interesting projects are beyond the scope of a single motivated person and for those projects a larger team is needed. The size of the most productive team is dependent on many factors including deadline penalties; team-member skill sets; complexity of project and viable separation of responsibilities. In order to answer this question you need a clear understanding of the problem(s) at hand. Any attempt to give a definitive answer to such a vague question is, IMHO, a sign of someone deluded. I wonder - is there a joke in the question I'm meant to "get"?

    55. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately he's not the first person to recognize the phenomenon.

      How come that's unfortunate?

    56. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Da+Fokka · · Score: 1

      Thanks for brightnening up my rainy, hung over monday morning! There are pieces of breakfast on my screen :)

    57. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Finuvir · · Score: 4, Funny

      Is "Physics Toady" a magazine for scientifically minded sycophants?

      --
      Why is anything anything?
    58. Re:GLAT - sample questions by matt4077 · · Score: 1

      just read the thing out loud and you'll find the solution. its not mathematics, its more a semantic problem.

    59. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Cereal+Box · · Score: 1

      What will be the next great improvement in search technology?

      Put another way, "Would you care to give away your million dollar idea for free? If so, please write it down."

    60. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Carnivore · · Score: 1

      My wife and I tried the powers of 10 thing, but we managed to skip the first match, which is pretty easy. We were working on the 10 billion range, but I gave up and wrote a small perl script to brute force it. The answer 199981 is correct. There is a cluster of f(n)=n around that number.

      It turns out that the perl script was much faster, but less fun. She was thinking that the answer would be a googol, but alas, it is not to be.

    61. Re:GLAT - sample questions by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      If you truly believe this shit, then you REALLY need to get out into the real world.

      It's a myth that has become VERY VERY easy to turn into a self fulfilling prophecy.

      --
      No Comment.
    62. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Basje · · Score: 1

      I really believe it. People differ. You obviously don't see it as an appealing prospect. So don't act on it, no hard feelings. However, please accept other people who do feel like I do.

      This is not to say that Google is a haven for nerds. I wouldn't know, I've never been there. All I'm saying is that when you do something because you like it, rather than because you're getting paid to do it, you do it better. Because you care. Money can be gotten anywhere.

      Google recognizes that, and tries to find people who like to do what Google needs, and therefore do it better, because they like to.

      --
      the pun is mightier than the sword
    63. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      I'd post the results but I haven't the patience to circumvent the lameness filters.

      Let me guess--the margin's too damn small, too, right?

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    64. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Koguma · · Score: 0

      > How many different ways can you color an icosahedron with one of three colors on each face?

      How about Pie, Tomato, and Egg on each face?

    65. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where does it say that no two letters can have the same value?

    66. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's 2pm on a sunny Sunday afternoon in the Bay Area. You're minutes from the Pacific Ocean, redwood forest hiking trails and world class cultural attractions. What do you do?

      I go to the grocery store because everybody else in the bay area is watching the stinky 49er game and the lines are short.

    67. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Kehvarl · · Score: 1

      In 29 words or fewer, describe what you would strive to accomplish if you worked at Google Labs.

      Profit

    68. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you truly believe this shit, then you REALLY need to get out into the real world.

      I find it amusing that you contradict yourself in the very next sentence. But anyway, the world he described where people like what they do _is_ the real world for some of us.

      It's a myth that has become VERY VERY easy to turn into a self fulfilling prophecy.

      You make that sound like a bad thing? I like the fact that I believed, as he did, that I could get paid for doing something I like - and I'm very happy that it was a self fulfilling prophecy. I'm now doing stuff I enjoy and getting paid very well for it.

    69. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Put another way, "Would you care to give away your million dollar idea for free? If so, please write it down."

      That would only happen if Google was Evil.

    70. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya, I couldn't speed it up. Maybe someone could, but I'd be surprised if they do it significantly. I'm thinking that it's a ton slower simply because it's all function overhead. C wins simply because you don't have to call add(), eq(), getitem(), and so on.

    71. Re:GLAT - sample questions by 2short · · Score: 1

      "She was thinking that the answer would be a googol, but alas, it is not to be."

      I hope she wasn't thinking that for very long.

      f(googol) = 1, pretty obviously.

    72. Re:GLAT - sample questions by 2short · · Score: 1


      I can divide any industry in to two types of people: Those who see a job as something they do to earn money, so they can spend the rest of their time doing things they like, and those who realize they'll spend about half their working hours doing their job, and so insist that it too be something they like.

    73. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 1

      You forgot all of them after the decimal point.

      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    74. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 1
      Q. What's broken with Unix?

      /bin/ls -1 {/usr/bin,/bin} | grep -e "^..$" | wc -l
      is too low a number.

      How would you fix it?

      /bin/ls {/usr/bin,/bin} | cut -b1,2 | sort | uniq
      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    75. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solve this cryptic equation, realizing of course that values for M and E could be interchanged. No leading zeroes are allowed. WWWDOT - GOOGLE = DOTCOM

      DOTCOM = $0, so there must not be a solution j/k ;) Actually, I think there are solvers for these that can be found via Google (heh), use one?

      Write a haiku describing possible methods for
      predicting search traffic seasonality.

      The future
      Is unpredictable
      Make wild guess

      What's the next line? 3 1 2 2 1 1 "Three ones, two twos, one one." (Say this out loud :)

      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike. There is a dusty laptop here with a weak wireless connection. There are dull, lifeless gnomes strolling about. What dost thou do?

      A) Wander aimlessly, bumping into obstacles until you are eaten by a grue.
      B) Use the laptop as a digging device to tunnel to the next level.
      C) Play MPoRPG until the battery dies along with your hopes.
      D) Use the computer to map the nodes of the maze and discover an exit path.
      E) Email your resume to Google, tell the lead gnome you quit and find yourself in a whole different world

      E? :) Nah, all of the above!

      What's broken with Unix? How would you fix it? Insidious lawsuits--obliterate SCO, support OSRM.

      On your first day at Google, you discover that your cubicle mate wrote the textbook you used as a primary resource in your first year of graduate school. Do you:
      A) Fawn obsequiously and ask if you can have an autograph.
      B) Sit perfectly still and use only soft keystrokes to avoid disturbing her concentration
      C) Leave her daily offerings of granola and English toffee from the food bins.
      D) Quote your favorite formula from the textbook and explain how it's now your mantra.
      E) Show her how example 17b could have been solved with 34 fewer lines of code.

      I think I'd choose E :) (or F - I didn't go to grad school! D'oh!) Or whichever. No point in being too constrained by a test like this!

      Which of the following expresses Google's over-arching philosophy?
      A) "I'm feeling lucky"
      B) "Don't be evil"
      C) "Oh, I already fixed that"
      D) "You should never be more than 50 feet from food"
      E) All of the above

      E, of course ;) I mean, really, considering they have that nice employee cafeteria and such and... well. Yeah, E! :)

      How many different ways can you color an icosahedron with one of three colors on each face?

      I don't know, but Google probably does. That's the fun bit--look up the things you don't know. This certainly beats going back, digging up my old geometry books and such, and searching for someone else's solution to this (or spending a long time solving it myself)!

      What colors would you choose?

      Mauve, taupe and some other color that isn't fugly :) Or else I'd just pick three random crayons from the huge box and use those.

      This space is intentionally blank. Please fill it with something that improves upon emptiness.

      Mu. (Or the kanjii for it... I'd have to look that one up, though.)

      On an infinite, two-dimensional, rectangular lattice of 1-ohm resistors, what is the resistance between two nodes that are a knight's move away?

      I used to do engineering. I would have to test this empirically to make sure it conforms to the theoretical result ;) Now, please provide me with this lattice and... *innocent*

      It's 2pm on a sunny Sunday afternoon in the Bay Area. You're minutes from the Pacific Ocean, redwood forest hiking trails and world class cultural attractions. What do you do?

      Sit in Grandma's darkened basement, hacking away and searching for a job. That or go searching for one of those "lives" I hear other people sometimes have. Better to play it by ear.

      In your opinion, what is the most beautiful math equation ever derived?

      Not a formula, but the

    76. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's broken with Unix?
      Wrong question. See Pike

      How would you fix it?
      Throw it out and start over. I know that's a heretical statement, but it needs to be done.

    77. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Heywood+Jablonski · · Score: 1
      Write a haiku describing possible methods for predicting search traffic seasonality.

      Brittany Marries
      A thousand servers cry out
      To balance the load

      How many different ways can you color an icosahedron with one of three colors on each face?

      1. Crayons
      2. Colored Pencils
      3. Watercolors

      On an infinite, two-dimensional, rectangular lattice of 1-ohm resistors, what is the resistance between two nodes that are a knight's move away?

      Trick question: There's no such thing as a two-dimensional resistor.

    78. Re:GLAT - sample questions by mshurpik · · Score: 1

      "Money can be gotten anywhere" is a very revealing statement. Only a dork would say something like this. For most people, money is very difficult, labor-intensive thing to accumulate.

      The idea that you can make hundreds of thousands of dollars sitting in front of a monitor and pressing buttons is a fairly intangible ideal. Programmers deserve a high salary for their skills, but if you go out into the real world, you will find that ordinary people are struggling - including a lot of ex-programmers.

      I disagree with the idea that hiring a bunch of nerds who love their job does, in fact, produce a better product. Because I've been part of nerd-herds before, and they are chaotic.

    79. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike. There is a dusty laptop here with a weak wireless connection. There are dull, lifeless gnomes strolling about. What dost thou do?
      A) Wander aimlessly, bumping into obstacles until you are eaten by a grue.
      B) Use the laptop as a digging device to tunnel to the next level.
      C) Play MPoRPG until the battery dies along with your hopes.
      D) Use the computer to map the nodes of the maze and discover an exit path.
      E) Email your resume to Google, tell the lead gnome you quit and find yourself in a whole different world


      Just sit.

      Suffering is inseparable from existence but inward extinction of the self and of the senses culminates in a state of illumination beyond both suffering and existence.

    80. Re:GLAT - sample questions by King+Babar · · Score: 1

      Anonymous Coward asks: Where does it say that no two letters can have the same value? It doesn't, here, but that's a general rule for cryptarithmetic. Think of it as a substitution cipher for arithmetic.

      --

      Babar

    81. Re:GLAT - sample questions by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 1

      The only relationships I can find for any triangle ABC and point P, without doing trig on measured numbers, are (labeling the two sides formed from p closed to a e and f, with e closer to c. Labeling the sides near b d and f with f closer to a):

      e-d=b-a and d-e=a-b
      f-e=c-b and e-f=b-c
      d-f=a-c and f-d=c-a

      It strikes me that these relationships will give the needed side lengths for any measurable triangle, but they still feel sort of hackish.

      I'm just wondering if someone spotted a better answer (no trig, the accuracy of the ruler is not specified)

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
    82. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, no. You misunderstand the problem.
      Read again, and repeat. ;)

    83. Re:GLAT - sample questions by 19usc2462bH · · Score: 1
      What will be the next great improvement in search technology?

      Uhm, uhm... I want to improve Google by adding

      whois

      currency conversion (the default should be to convert into US dollars, or perhaps the currency of the country of your own domain)

      grouping of site results (i.e. if you use site:foo.com) by sub-domains (site:google.com gives you a hodge-podge of answers.google.com, directory.google.com, www.google.com and so on) and usenet searches (groups.google.com) by groups. (Please, please, please don't let the next generation of Google Groups end up looking anything like groups-beta.google.com)

      the option of never, ever displaying any page available in Froogle in normal searches.

      Also, I want to find that darn geek porn site again. (As in nekkid girls, not hardware.)

    84. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's simple. Let's assume an equilateral triangle (all sides equal). You make arcs of equal radius with the compass from each of the ends on one of the sides (arcs can be any radius, but must overlap). The point where the arcs intersect will be used to find the mid-point of that side by drawing a line from the point of the triangle opposite the side you just bi-sected. Repeat this for one or both of the remaining sides of the triangle. The point where the lines intersect in the middle of the triangle will be point "P". Picture the result like a Mercedes Benz symbol, except that the outside is the triangle instead of a circle. So you've just divided the large triangle into three smaller but equal triangles, each of which must have the same area and perimeter.

    85. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real answer is "approximately 1". It's an asymptotic curve that approaches very close to one, but never really gets there. Yes, the others are correct to say that there are an infinite number of slices (or paths between the two points in question), but each slice gets progressively smaller and smaller the further away from the points in question. At no time does the result exceed unity (not infinity). And since there is no path which is a direct "short" between the two points, the answer can also never be zero.

      0.999999999999999999(infinite nines)....

    86. Re:GLAT - sample questions by firespeaker · · Score: 1

      It is an Exclusive AND statement. Take a look at the pattern of the ones that fall down. If it is a 1 & 1 then the next in the sequence is a 2. Otherwise it is just a 1.

    87. Re:GLAT - sample questions by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 1

      The origional problem did not specify an equlateral triangle.

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
    88. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because I've been part of nerd-herds before, and they are chaotic.

      That's why Google only hires nerds with a PhD. They have proven that they are disciplined enough to finish a PhD. At the very least.

    89. Re:GLAT - sample questions by Carnivore · · Score: 1

      er, no. The function f(x) returns the number of 1s that are used in counting _up to_ that number.
      f(1)=1
      f(10)=2
      f(200000)=200000

  12. Re:DUPE! ? by jpmkm · · Score: 0

    What the fuck are you talking about? Do you not know the difference between a billboard and a magazine?

  13. Something big on the horizon? by ogar572 · · Score: 0

    With google using these recruiting techniques, is it possible that they might have something big on the horizon where they need lots of quality people? I mean these new techniques require someone who can solve problems and code rather than just code. It also requires more that just click here to submit resume where they might get, lets sat 1,236,754 resumes where only 20 of them have the qualifications.

    1. Re:Something big on the horizon? by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 1, Insightful
      I mean these new techniques require someone who can solve problems and code rather than just code.

      There's no such thing as a coder who can't problem solve. That's what coding is.

      --
      Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    2. Re:Something big on the horizon? by rasafras · · Score: 1

      There is such a thing as a coder who can't problem solve:
      A bad coder. And they do exist.

    3. Re:Something big on the horizon? by Jaff · · Score: 1

      but how many people being hired as coders couldn't find their way out of a wet sack of dry mustard seed? incompetance is a horrible plague that is spreading much faster than ever before due to the declining state our our secondary and post-secondary education systems.

    4. Re:Something big on the horizon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe it's a giant artificial brain? you know, the kind that had good intentions but you want it to play thermonucleur war so it learns how to kill humans and see's them as a threat. i, for one welcome our new google master

    5. Re:Something big on the horizon? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      what are you, freshman in college?
      I have had the ... 'Pleasure' ... of working with coders that can not do any practical problem solving.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:Something big on the horizon? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      Google is mostly a research lab, not a software development house. This is what you'd expect.

    7. Re:Something big on the horizon? by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      With google using these recruiting techniques, is it possible that they might have something big on the horizon where they need lots of quality people?

      A layoff?

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
  14. Physics Today has it too. by ajdecon · · Score: 5, Informative

    The September issue of Physics Today also had a GLAT insert. I guess Google's trying for all sorts of backgrounds...

    --
    "Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself." -Richard Feynman
    1. Re:Physics Today has it too. by DrLudicrous · · Score: 1

      Heh you beat me to the punch. I found it rather annoying as it prevented me from folding the magazine the way I like to, so I ripped it out.

    2. Re:Physics Today has it too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually they had them for quite some time now. i think they may also have them in Optics and Photonics News, but i'm not sure about that... i lost them somewhere

    3. Re:Physics Today has it too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or rather they're trying to reach all sorts of shareholders. Google has been hiring for a long time. All that's changed is IPO. You're seeing marketing do a great buzz campaign.

    4. Re:Physics Today has it too. by nettdata · · Score: 1

      Well, in case you're wondering, neither Mad, Heavy Metal, or Hustler had the GLAT insert.

      *sigh*

      What does that say about MY background?

      --



      $0.02 (CDN)
  15. Re:wtf people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or even just start using Coral Cache links. It's almost no work for them.

  16. Answer to #17 by CustomFort · · Score: 1

    I have to go to sleep, but it seems to me that the answer to #17 is binary 10. There are (Base 10) 2 "1"s in the numbers between (Base 2) 10 and 0 (ie 0 1 10).

    For those who didn't get to read the page, #17 went something like this:

    Consider a function that, given a whole number n, returns the number of 1's in the numbers between 0 and n. E.g. f(13) = 6. Notice f(1) = 1. Find the next larger n such that f(n) = n.

    1. Re:Answer to #17 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a bit of a sidestep.... points for creativitiy I suppose.

      There is an actual answer. I haven't bothered to figure out what it is. Basically you need the number of ones to catch up with you, and that will happen once you start to get lots of leading ones. Probably somewhere in the 111110s or something like that.

    2. Re:Answer to #17 by Ann+Elk · · Score: 1

      Since their example is "f(13)=6", one can assume they're not using base 2.

    3. Re:Answer to #17 by SamBeckett · · Score: 1

      It's not base 2, it's base 10.. "The number of 1s required when writing out every number 0...n"

    4. Re:Answer to #17 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thinking about the numbers 1 - 99, it seems impossible, but as you said, when you get a large number of leading ones, you start to catch up. While sitting on a plane recently (sans laptop), I got out paper and pen and found the answer. Turned out to be about as easy to solve on paper as it would be to write a program to solve it.

      I'd still like to write a program to confim my answer. If I'm right, it will fit in a signed 32bit int.

    5. Re:Answer to #17 by a_n_d_e_r_s · · Score: 1

      Actually not - how about if n is 2 ?

      --
      Just saying it like it are.
    6. Re:Answer to #17 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      # 199981

      nones = 0
      for i in xrange(1,100000000):

      s = "%d" % (i,)
      nones += len(filter(lambda c: c=='1', s ))

      if i > 1 and nones == i:
      print "match at ", i
      break

  17. What makes a good Google employee.. by hyu · · Score: 5, Funny

    "It is filled with math and Google-related trivia." So, really, you are being tested on how well you can use Google to find the answers. Brilliant!

    1. Re:What makes a good Google employee.. by evilviper · · Score: 1
      So, really, you are being tested on how well you can use Google to find the answers. Brilliant!

      That reminds me of a test I took a few years ago... It was web-based, with a very short time-limit, but it used javascript to enforce that time limit. Disabling javascript, you actually see the countdown timer frozen in-place.

      Now that I think about it, all tests are that way... Although the "right way" to pass them is to memorize everything, you can always get a good grade by just being a bit smarter than whoever wrote the test...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  18. same test in the current Linux Magazine by BigGerman · · Score: 1

    same questions as posted above.

  19. Re:Way to go, michael. by MrPlab · · Score: 1

    despite your rhetoric, caching system is an interesting idea.. anyone got any ideas?

    and more important, i'm sure it's been discussed before. anyone wanna direct me to a prev thread?

    --
    sortakinda.ca | canadian paraphrasing.
  20. Re:Way to go, michael. by BladeMelbourne · · Score: 1
    You could always put something like the following in your page header:

    <?php
    if (strpos($_SERVER['http_referer'],'slashdot.org',0) >= 0):
    exit();
    endif;
    ?>

    Hopefully there are no serious errors - haven't the time to check!

  21. It wouldn't be hard at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All Slashdot has to do it start using Coral Cache .nyud.net:8090 links instead of straight links. No backend work for Slashdot.

  22. Is anyone else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... starting to get just a little bit tired of all this "we're the elite, we hire only PhD's" crap that seems to permeate the "google image" these days? I preferred it when google was this cool, neat, simple little search engine that gave really excellent results very quickly. And yes, it was invented by a couple of really smart kids. But there just seems to be a steadily growing mythology about how everyone that works there is a fricking genius or something... I dunno, I'm not bitter about it (trust me, I didn't apply and get turned down or anything) but I doesn't anyone else get tired of this?

    It's a company, they were in the right place at the right time and they have a good product. It has nothing to do with being smart in the sense that Mensa or PhD's or whatnot relate to the issue... you can't make a successful company better just because you employ cartloads of post-docs. If it were as simple as that then every PhD out there would be a successful businessman and be rich. But that's not it! Being "smart" (i.e. being able to solve puzzles and grok math equations) is only a single, quite narrow aspect of "intelligence". We all know the guy who's ultra-bright at science or math, but bloody useless in the "real world" or (gasp) interpersonal relationships. To worship puzzle-solving and the ability to sail through the Mensa tests is just something that grates on me. It's not that I hate smart people, believe me - I guess it's just elitism in general that bugs me.

    Ok, that's off my chest, now I can go back to watching Buffy and drinking beer.

    1. Re:Is anyone else... by boomgopher · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, one person I used to work with who was hired by Google was nothing special in the slightest, and was slated to be fired by my company in a layoff (due to lack of tech skills, that is).


      --
      Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
    2. Re:Is anyone else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm with you. The smarty-pants PhD PR image does bother me. Fucking snots.

    3. Re:Is anyone else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i might be a little worried about the future of a company that can't find a use for someone google thinks is worth hiring.

      most businesses fail as a result of making bad decisions. since you don't give any details about how this person was unimpressive, though, i can't really tell. a lot of people are unimpressed by my tech skills because i tell them i don't know how to fix their broken windows 98 machines. it doesn't mean i can't. it's just that i don't want to be bothered with their little problems.

      a successful enterprise must motivate its people to see its little problems as interesting and important.

    4. Re:Is anyone else... by mefus · · Score: 1

      Why is it elitism to enjoy solving puzzles, or to recognize that as a job skill?

      --
      mefus
      In Open Society, GPL Software frees YOU!
    5. Re:Is anyone else... by Xshare · · Score: 1

      There's prolly a reason he no longer works for google too.

    6. Re:Is anyone else... by sglane81 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Being "smart" (i.e. being able to solve puzzles and grok math equations) is only a single, quite narrow aspect of "intelligence".

      Intelligence measures two abilities: learning and reasoning. Being smart is the application of intelligence.

      We all know the guy who's ultra-bright at science or math, but bloody useless in the "real world" or (gasp) interpersonal relationships.

      People's motivations differ. That person who is ultra-bright may not see applying that logic as something to persue. The benefit of diversity is this: there will always be someone who can take that logic and apply it to something to make it useful to other people who don't care how it works.

      What most people see as the goal of life is getting laid and having children (most of the time subconsciously) thus propogating the species. The basic law of nature (and man) is to survive by any means necessary. Most people make their attempt at immortality via offspring, some through presence (actors), others through published works/name recognition. There are also a number of people who create a fictitious being and place where they will live out eternity in bliss (religion).

      Since it is illegal to test people's intelligence in the U.S. for a job, google is going to where the smart people are. I see nothing wrong with that. Reading a person on paper (that they wrote) is not a very accurate means for judging a person's intellect or skills. Testing their abilities just to get to the application is a smart thing to do.

      None of this is about elitism. Some people do feel superior to others and are truly elitists, but it is generally the other people who feel inferior and have to tear the "elite" down by any means available.

      None of this is an attack on you, so don't take it that way.

      --
      This is the Internet. You can say "fuck" here. - AC
    7. Re:Is anyone else... by IvyMike · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Since it is illegal to test people's intelligence in the U.S. for a job

      Reference, please? I don't think that's true (unless it's relatively recent). For example, seven years ago IBM was still giving aptitude tests as a part of the interview process for new hires.

    8. Re:Is anyone else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      This may differ from state to state and I was probably overly broad when saying U.S. This was given to my from an attorney who said something to the effect that questions have to have a direct relationship to the job applying for. FWIW, He said he could argue intelligence tests have no bearing on most jobs. At the time, I was under the impression he meant for developers as well but I didn't take into account skilled vs unskilled jobs. Of course, IANAL.

    9. Re:Is anyone else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it bothers me too. Google's "smart aura" reminds me of the successful PR done by such places as MIT. This PR is intended to hide the fact that these institutions are autistic. Of course, the average person on the street doesn't understand autism, so they just fall to their knees and grovel.

      Sure, there is something to be said for hiring intellectuals. I've seen it done, and it can produce some pretty wild results. But you also need even smarter managers, because a room full of academic types cannot self-manage. Almost by definition.

    10. Re:Is anyone else... by Stridar · · Score: 1

      I found this question interesting enough to do a quick search. This webpage states that it is not illegal as long as a professional can argue that the qualities measured by the test are in line with the qualities necessary for success in the position under consideration.

    11. Re:Is anyone else... by Vlion · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No kidding.
      Its interesting that they've been advertising for hiring alot in the last year, along with the IPO.

      I'd spend some time seriously solving google recruitment problems except:
      i)the geekier-than-thou image google is exuding is irridating.
      ii)I'm under-graduating may 06. I don't feel like either dropping out or messing around with the google recruiters.
      iii)I'm moderatatly sure I could crack most of the google problems, given time.
      iv)Is google a research lab or a search engine?
      Both are fine, but they are redefining their role, and if they screw it up, they go kaputt!

      I might be called "geek" but there are severe problems with the "geek" culture.
      But thats coming from a senior with many graduate courses worth of math books on his shelf, a HP49g+, a TI86, and way too many anime CDs.
      ^_^

      --
      /b
      |f(x)dx = F(b) - F(a)
      /a
    12. Re:Is anyone else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll just add you to my list of stupid people that buys technical books he never reads.

    13. Re:Is anyone else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it to be true that people who hate on 'smart people' do so for the reasons you cite. But it is emphatically false that elitism doesn't exist, or isn't predominant in some sections. Aristocracies, like the conservative model of how the US should be, are by nature elitist.

      Here I define 'elite' to be a group of people with percieved authority. The question is whether the elite is meritorious. Scientists are most certainly a meritorious elite on questions of science.
      Aristocrats are elites, but history has showed that most aristocrats lack merit. People like tearing down aristocrats to their level because aristocrats don't merit the authority they have been given.
      The problem is when people want to tear down elites who have merit, or when people accept elites who don't.

      Being an elite isn't a problem. Some people are quite naturally better than others at certain things. People who are accepted as elite despite a lack of merit, or not taken seriously despite having merit is a problem.

    14. Re:Is anyone else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iv)Is google a research lab or a search engine?

      Is Xerox a research lab or a photocopier company?
      Is IBM a research lab or a software company?
      Is Microsoft a research lab or a large pile of money for rolling around naked in?
    15. Re:Is anyone else... by Vlion · · Score: 1

      Some companies can transition successfully between a single-purpose company to a multi-purpose company.
      Others can't. That's my point.
      Remember Xerox had far more market share.
      Also think about how active the modern AT&T labs are...*cough*

      --
      /b
      |f(x)dx = F(b) - F(a)
      /a
  23. orwellian by mnemonic_ · · Score: 5, Funny

    That line is now gone. michael has now rectified history. That line does not exist; it had never existed...

    1. Re:orwellian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Ah Ha! Nice try micheal, but even big brother himself could not erase the omnipresent google cache! The line lives!

    2. Re:orwellian by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      Aha! I've got it! I know who Michael really is!

      Hi George, never get anything right the first time do you? Been re-writing, erm, I mean _finishing_ any good movies lately?

      Nice chatting with you George, though I suppose this conversation won't have existed in another 10 minutes or so.

      --
      No Comment.
  24. Re:DUPE! ? by MBCook · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I've got karma to burn.

    As another reply to your comment pointed out, you're and idiot and should not have been moderated up. In fact, you score dropped from the time I saw your comment to clicking reply (not long).

    So let's clear it. What you pointed out was a billboard with a question on it to recruit for google.

    The GLAT was a little "book" that was a 4 sides of paper (not standard size, smaller). It looked like a school aptitude test in almost every way. It had all sorts of interesting questions in it like "The space below was intentionally left blank. Please improve upon this." and "In an infinate two-dimentional lattice of 1 ohm resistors, what is the resistance between any two points a knight's move away?" and other such things. It's full of that kind of stuff and more.

    So in conclusion, this is not a dupe. Why not try LOOKING at things (or even reading the submission) before trying to get karma by yelling DUPE.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  25. GLAT? How 'bout SPLAT? by RealBeanDip · · Score: 1

    Can we come up with what SPLAT means... as it relates to websites that get posted on Slashdot?

    --

    You know you're a geek if you've ever replied to a tagline.

    1. Re:GLAT? How 'bout SPLAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot Post Leaves After Taste

    2. Re:GLAT? How 'bout SPLAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Q1) How many 14 year olds does it take to screw in a lightbulb?

      A1) Ha! This is SLASDOT!

    3. Re:GLAT? How 'bout SPLAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot
      Posted
      Link
      Achieves
      Timeouts

    4. Re:GLAT? How 'bout SPLAT? by irokitt · · Score: 1

      Given a website hosted on someones P4 2.53GHz, 512MB RAM, 256 up 384 down, how many posts will the server last?
      1) 2
      2) 5
      3) 42
      4) Cowboyneal!

      How much of each article do you read?
      1) All of it
      2) The first and last paragraphs
      3) The first three syllables
      4) I gently caress the server with telepathy, thereby deducing enough to allow me to post caustic criticism at will.

      Do you have a girlfriend?
      1) No
      2) No
      3) Girlfriend?
      4) Mu

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    5. Re:GLAT? How 'bout SPLAT? by CXI · · Score: 1

      Can we come up with what SPLAT means... as it relates to websites that get posted on Slashdot?

      What, like a name for it:
      Slash-Powered Link Attack Technology

      or more of a description for the target server's log:
      Slashdot Posters Limited Aggregate Termination

  26. Re:DUPE! ? by LostCluster · · Score: 0, Redundant

    There's a reason why there was a ? in my subject. It wasn't clear at the time I was posting it was a dupe.

    At the time I was posting, the article got slashdotted so there was no article to read. Not even Google's Cache was saving us.

    Besides, this story is very close to the billboard story in that Google is posting its want ads in the form of geek quizes in order to reduce the number of resumes they get and hopefully improve their signal-to-noise ratio. If anything, the summary should have at least mentioned the past story to make it glaringly clear it wasn't a dupe.

  27. Don't Worry by superpulpsicle · · Score: 5, Funny

    The site might have been slashdotted, but I got the Google Labs Aptitude Test multiple choice section right here.

    Q: What is the supreme search engine on the planet?
    a.) google.com
    b.) aol keyword google

    Q: What is 8^7 x 32^2 / $ -2352.8a + x + y + $
    a.) google = moneyopoly
    b.) google = infinite $$

    Q: Did you go to standford?
    a.) yes
    b.) pick this and fail

  28. I DO! by DAldredge · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's really, really hard to take a billboard to the bathroom!

    What do I win?

  29. Re:Way to go, michael. by alatesystems · · Score: 1
    <?php
    if (ereg("slashdot.org",$_SERVER["HTTP_REFERER"])
    {
    header("Location: http://www.tubgirl.com");
    exit;
    }
    ?>
    That ought to drive /. visitors away!
  30. Resistor lattice? by gomoX · · Score: 1

    On an infinite, two-dimensional, rectangular lattic of 1-ohm resistors, what is the resistance between two nodes that are a knight's move away?

    Anyone knows this one? Is there an "easy" way or just the traditional infinite sum approach i'm too lazy to think of?

    --
    My english is sow-sow. Sowhat?
    1. Re:Resistor lattice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zero Ohms, Becasue there are infiniate paralell resistince paths, and resticne in paralllel is 1/(r1+r2...+rn) 1/(infinity) = 0.

    2. Re:Resistor lattice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I should probably work out the sums, but shouldn't the answer be infinite resistance? The heuristic would be: A infinite two dimensional lattice is recurrent for a simple random walk. That is, the probability of escaping to infinity is 0. Which implies that the effective resistance of the network is infinite. But then the handwaving comes in to suggest that the infinite sums of the resistance over all possible paths between any two given points in the lattice is infinite.

    3. Re:Resistor lattice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a pretty weak arguement. By that same logic you can argue that by continuously adding values to the number zero, you'll reach infinity.

      Say I take the sequence 1/10 + 1/100 + 1/100 ... and add it to zero. I'm never going to even reach 0.2! I'll end up with 0.1111111111111111

      Similarly, every time you add another parallel path on that resistor grid, you're adding a weaker and weaker path that has less influence on the total resistance.

    4. Re:Resistor lattice? by anamexis · · Score: 1

      "Zero Ohms, Becasue there are infiniate paralell resistince paths, and resticne in paralllel is 1/(r1+r2...+rn) 1/(infinity) = 0." " I should probably work out the sums, but shouldn't the answer be infinite resistance?" Well, now that we've covered the extremes...

    5. Re:Resistor lattice? by Zaphod-AVA · · Score: 1

      Maybe my electronics is rusty, but I understood that electrons take the shortest possible route, which in this case is past 3 1 ohm resistors, or 3 ohms.

      =Z

    6. Re:Resistor lattice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, electrons take the easiest possible route. Note though, that electron congestion will make other routes more appealing. And every route has some chance of some electroncs, however small. It's like traffic, really.

    7. Re:Resistor lattice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, you just proved that the resistance is no more than 3 ohms, but it is actually less. If you put a pair of resisors, a 3 ohm and a 10 ohm, in parallel, the resistance is not the "shortest path" (3 ohms), but a little less (~ 2.30769 ohms). Check out a basic electronics book to see why.

      I think the answer to the original question is 0 ohms, for analogous but more complex reasons.

    8. Re:Resistor lattice? by Snoochie+Bootchie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't think you're drawing the diagram of the problem correctly. You're finding the resistance between two points defined by the knight's move ("two squares straight and one square to the side" http://chess.about.com/library/ble132kn.htm). As a result, the resistance is definately not infinite.

      Each square of the infinite chess board has a resistor. Therefore, the squares involved in te knight's move look like this:

      --+--R--+--R--+--R--+--B
      | | | |
      R R R R
      | | | |
      A--+--R--+--R--+--R--+--
      Y
      Where each R is 1 Ohm. You're finding the resistance between the points A and B. We want to find the resistance between points A and B. Let's look at a simplification and find the resistance between points B and Y. You have two Rs in series and then each of these pairs are in parallel: 1/(1/(R+R) + 1/(R+R)) = 1/(1/2 + 1/2) = 1.

      Care to guess what the resistance between A and B is?

    9. Re:Resistor lattice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am completely wrong in my heuristic, as shown in the example provided by in this AC post above.

    10. Re:Resistor lattice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You Gringos!! Never study Physics in high school do you? This is a derivative of a question from the tome of physics problems by Irodov. I came across the original problem 9 years ago while preparing for the IIT entrance exams (IIT being the venerable engg. schools in India).

      The solution goes something like this:

      The effective resistance between two nodes in a circuit is the ratio of potential difference (V) between the nodes to the current flowing (I) between the nodes.
      Now consider applying a potential difference between the 2 points in the question specified. Let us call the first point (where the knight starts) A and the second B. Since the lattice is infinite, any current flowing into A will get equally distributed between the 4 arms at A. Similarly, since B is the only point from which current is flowing out, considering Kirchoff's laws, the current flowing out of B would equal that flowing in at A. Considering the resistances were 'R' instead of 1 ohm (you learn very quickly to solve problems in expression when you work on the Irodov problem set), the total potential drop between A and B comes to be 7/12 * I * R. You will arrive at this using simple symmetry and basic circuit theory methods. Hence, the effective resistance = V / I = 7/12 R. In this case then, the answer is 7/12 ohm.

      Cheers.

      - Hooeezit

    11. Re:Resistor lattice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't the diagram like this (between A and B)?

      -+--R--+--R--B-
      | | |
      R R R
      | | |
      -A--R--+--R--+-

      I get two symetrical paths in parallel... each path being( 2 || 2 + 1 = 2). 2 || 2 = 1. One ohm total. All resistor paths are taken into account.

    12. Re:Resistor lattice? by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      But what about the even simpler path of just one resistor? Link
      There are many paths around that resistor and each of them has to be taken into account, what you end up with is the sum of an infinite series.
      1/x = 1/R + 1/3R + 1/5R ...

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    13. Re:Resistor lattice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might find some hints at:
      http://rec-puzzles.org/sol.pl/physics/resistors

    14. Re:Resistor lattice? by Snoochie+Bootchie · · Score: 1

      I think the assumption in my set up and solution is that this is the only "closed circuit." In other words, I'm assuming the resistance for all other paths is infinite (nothing else is connected), and, therefore, you'll measure the resistance only across the resistor network that I "drew." So, it's not the resistance from the starting point to the knight's move away point for all possible paths since the resistance of any other path is infinite.

      Your assumptions are leading you down a path like that discussed here http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ResistorNetwork.html.

    15. Re:Resistor lattice? by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the assumption in my set up and solution is that this is the only "closed circuit."

      And I think that is an invalid assumption. The resistance can't be assumed to be infinite when they state exactly what it is and it can be calculated to be non-infinite. If your move is up-up-right for the knight's move, and you go down-right-up-up-up you will have another unique path, and the resistance will be a non-infinite 5 ohm. Of course, you can go 200*right-up-up-199*left and have a non-infinite resistance as well. Even if you assumed all other paths to have infinite resistance, you have an infinite number of them. You need to calculate infinity number of paths times 1/infinity resistance. It shortens to infinity/infinity, which needs more mathmetical inspection to determine what the answer is. I'm not up to it right now.

    16. Re:Resistor lattice? by Snoochie+Bootchie · · Score: 1

      I think your arguement adds an additional assumption--that there are infinitely many knights moves taken. The original problem does not state that. The question stated, "what is the resistance between two nodes that are a knight's move away?" The question did not state "N knight's moves away" or the like.

      I'll pose another question, what is the resistance across any single resistor in that lattice? According to you, the resistance is still an infinite series since you can take an infinite number of paths between those two points.

    17. Re:Resistor lattice? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I think your arguement adds an additional assumption--that there are infinitely many knights moves taken. The original problem does not state that. The question stated, "what is the resistance between two nodes that are a knight's move away?" The question did not state "N knight's moves away" or the like.

      Electricity can be assumed to take the path of least resistance because that is convenient. However, electricity takes *all* paths. It is not an "assumption" I made, but a fact of current flow. Going a knight's move away is not restricted to up-up-over. It can be down-over-up-up-up. Both are unique paths to the same location, one knight's move away.

      I'll pose another question, what is the resistance across any single resistor in that lattice? According to you, the resistance is still an infinite series since you can take an infinite number of paths between those two points.

      Correct. Current can take the 1 ohm direct path, or it can go up-over-down for 3 ohms. Or it can go back-down-over-over-over-over-up back for 7 ohms. All are unique paths.

      I guess I'd ask the question back to you. If there are an infinite number of paths, why would you assume that they wouldn't be taken?

    18. Re:Resistor lattice? by Snoochie+Bootchie · · Score: 1

      While I can do without the condescending tone (I know that some current will flow even if the resistance is "large." It becomes a resistive divider. Even if you have 1 Ohm and 1 Megaohm, the 1 Megaohm path will carry a small amount of current.), I think I now understand your point.

      The contention, then, is that since all paths start and end at the same points, all of them are in parallel with each other.

      The first observation is to say that you have symmetry in this problem. You can find a path that goes up and the right that's 4 Ohms and a path that goes down and to the right that's 4 Ohms. Those two 4 Ohm paths are in parallel with each other and have an equivalent resistance of 2 Ohms. You can continue to do that for 5 Ohms, 6 Ohms, etc. And, since the pairs of parallel paths are the same value, the effect is to halve the resistance. So, you have 4/2=2, 5/2=2.5, 6/2=3, etc.

      The next observation is that these paths are still in paralle with each other. This results in the equivalent resistance of 2\\5/2\\3\\7/2 etc. where I'm using \\ to mean "in parallel with." I'm going to assume you can find paths down to the base resistance of 1 Ohm. (Can we find a path with 1/2 Ohm resistance?) The 1 Ohm paths yield an equivalent resistance of 1/2 Ohms; Two 2 Ohnm paths yield an equivalent resistance of 1 Ohms, and so on. The pattern that emerges is:

      1/2 \\ 2/2 \\ 3/2 \\ 4/2 \\ . . . \\ n/2

      The equation for the total resistance is then

      Rt = 1/[1/(1/2) + 1/(1/1) + 1/(3/2} + ... + 1/(n/2)]

      = 1/[2 + 1 + 2/3 + ... + 2/n]

      sum from i = 1 to infinity of 2/n.

      We can break this up into the sum of two infinte sums:

      even terms of original series: sum from 2 to infinity of 1 + 1/m
      plus
      odd terms: sum from 1 to infinity of 2+ 2/(2m+1)

      I think the even-term sum converges to 2. I'm not sure what the odd-term sum converges to.

    19. Re:Resistor lattice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I failed math in high school, but I am impressed by the answer of zero ohms! I hope that I am correct in assuming that the one-ohm resistors provide that resistance at room temperature. In which case ...

      We finally have the solution for a room-temperature superconductor, though, unfortunately, it requires an infinitely large mechanism :(

  31. Re:wtf people? by kjamez · · Score: 1

    or even better yet, have their automated linking mechanism (that puts the host in brackets after a link) also provide a link that says 'coral' to the same link, automatically. that would solve a lot of problems, methinks.

    --
    you can't have everything, where would you put it?
  32. Re:Way to go, michael. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One, two, three...... Awwwwwww.
    No fucking luck.

  33. but what if I work in sales? by cdtoad · · Score: 2, Funny

    Would the test be ineptitude test with math questions like "If Bill says he's interested, what time is tee time?" and "If Dale is the IT director at a company who's stock is valued under $1, how many drinks do you need to feed Dale before he signs." Bonus question... "How many drinks do you need to feed Dale before he tells you his company isn't going to buy?" Super bonus questions "How many drinks do you need to feed Dale before he says that he's looking for employment else where?"

    --
    when they ban enctryption only criminals wi$21*J *#JF$%!@#$':
    1. Re:but what if I work in sales? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps they don't need sales people.

      You'd only have to answer this question:
      Q) Train A leaves New York at 3:14 traveling west at 47 mph. Train B leaves Chicago at 3:51 traveling east at 53 mph. There are 769 miles of track between the two cities.

      Which train is closer to Chicago when they meet?

    2. Re:but what if I work in sales? by bn557 · · Score: 1

      well, since we don't know the path of the tracks, we can't authoratively answer that, but since we're only concerned about the closer when they meet, and if we assume a direct line between them(an old teacher of mine called this 'as the crow flies') the one leaving Chicago will be closer.

      P

      --
      Humans are slow, innaccurate, and brilliant; computers are fast, acurrate, and dumb; together they are unbeatable
  34. Google is evil. by Greg@RageNet · · Score: 5, Funny

    Google only hires PHD's; The difference between PHD and PHB is only two bits.

    -- Greg

    --
    Slashdot, would a spell-checker for posting be too much to ask? It's not rocket science!
    1. Re:Google is evil. by geekoid · · Score: 1, Funny

      I assume one of them is the Evil Bit?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Google is evil. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if it;s so eazy to spell wy do you need a spellchecker??

    3. Re:Google is evil. by InfinityBuffer · · Score: 1

      Nah, the only difference is the 2^1 bit.

    4. Re:Google is evil. by Shinglor · · Score: 1

      It could be three bits, or anything if the order isn't alphabetic in the number<->letter conversion.

    5. Re:Google is evil. by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      Actually, this isn't the case, for a number of reasons. Your parent post is incorrect as well.

      The binary encoding of "B" in ASCII is 1000010. The binary encoding of "D" is 1000100. So just to start, there are two differing bits.

      Second, the character set is not specified. If it were offset by one character from ASCII, the difference could be one bit. If it were non-alphabetic, the differing bits could come in any order.

      Third, the size of the character set is not specified. If wide characters are used, more than eight bits might be involved.

    6. Re:Google is evil. by wass · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The difference between PHD and PHB is only two bits.

      Wrong, the proper capitalization is PhD, meaning lowercased 'h'. Assuming ASCII, the 'h' goes from 0x38 for 'H' to 0x58 for the properly cased 'h'. So the difference between PhD and PHB is really 0x22.

      Thereby proving that there actually is something more than just a shave and a haircut between the PHB and PhD.

      And yes, this is probably the dorkiest slashdot post I've ever written.

      --

      make world, not war

    7. Re:Google is evil. by mikeage · · Score: 1

      Actually, most PHBs earn much more than two bits more than most PhDs...

      --
      -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
    8. Re:Google is evil. by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Greg,

      Slashdot, would a spell-checker for posting be too much to ask? It's not rocket science!

      Actualy, a really cool feature of the Safari (Mac OS X) web browser is that you can right click (or control-click for those still with one button) and correct the spelling in any form field on any website. A feature that I have been wanting in _all_ applications for a long time.

      No, its not rocket science :)

    9. Re:Google is evil. by ThousandStars · · Score: 1
      And yes, this is probably the dorkiest slashdot post I've ever written.

      Well, quick review of your posting history indicates that you have contributed to Star Wars discussions.

    10. Re:Google is evil. by Speare · · Score: 1

      How many bits need to flip to turn 0x00 to 0x22? It's only off by two bits. One bit to transpose case for 'h' -> 'H', and one bit to transpose 'D' to 'B'.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    11. Re:Google is evil. by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      And which bit is it you think you flip to transpose 'D' (0x44) to 'B' (0x42)?

      There are 10 types of people. Those that understand binary and those that don't.

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
  35. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  36. Google question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    From the test:

    "Orkut" is:
    A. Turkish for slow
    B. Turkish for painfully slow
    C. Turkish for unusable
    C. Turkish for "written in painfully slow and unusable ASP.NET"

    1. Re:Google question by cwcpetech · · Score: 1

      E. In need of major rework to eliminate the Stanfordisms it contains
      F. Is a direct code rip from the Stanford Nexus
      G. In need of being blackholed from the Internet due to any of the above

    2. Re:Google question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess who wrote Stanford Nexus? Orkut.

    3. Re:Google question by guLin · · Score: 1

      I am from Turkey and it is none of those things. :)

  37. Re:Way to go, michael. by BladeMelbourne · · Score: 1

    You are incorrect, it can be used to stop the page loading at all - before the first HTML/XML tag is sent to the browser.

    In this case, and most other Slashdottings, the site is brought down by too much legitimate HTTP traffic - especially when large images and screenshots are involved.

    Such PHP code (or similar ASP code) will drastically reduce the effect of a Slashdotting - to the point that (ideally) the server may continue to serve content to users who didn't come from Slashdot.

    I personally like Slashdot, however if you dont, why do you visit the site and why do you have a username? Why do you flame me with your username and not as an AC?

    Who is the idiot now? :p

  38. Re:DUPE! ? by jpmkm · · Score: 1

    I think the reason there is a ? in your subject is that you are a moron. The slashdot writeup CLEARLY stated that this is an insert in the new Linux Journal. Does that sound like a fucking billboard to you? Oh yeah, read the FIRST FUCKING WORD OF THE HEADLINE. ANOTHER. How much more clear would you like it?

  39. Re:Way to go, michael. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SomethingAwful did a similar trick, redirecting all Slashdot-referred visitors to goatse.cx (back when that was still its domain name).

    It's a great way to send a message to STOP LINKING TO OUR SITE; the editors ('specially michael) won't listen to any other types of messages.

  40. Yeah Yeah I saw this in the Mensa Rag last month by adaminnj · · Score: 1

    Yeah I saw this trick in the Mensa rag we get every month I was impressed until a few days later I read about the ads in Cambridge, Mass.
    Now there going after the linux top's so it's looking like a publicity stunt for there IPO Let's hire or look like we are hiring the top people (of which I'm probably not one) inflate the price of stock who knows.

    I wish them luck what ever they are trying to do. (for now)

    Support Free Trade Campus Now!

    --
    I'd Tell you all my secrets but I lie about my past
  41. Don't forget the foot soldier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    As an employee in a longtime Google competitor (gee, guess who), I must say from day to day I find the foot soldier, often educated at a state school, much more useful than the Einstein. They work their tails off, don't say no to any project, and work instead of cruising the web.

    1. Re:Don't forget the foot soldier by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You mean Yahoo?

      Yahoo has a totally, completely different approach to their systems. I mean totally different.

      Google is about churning out new ideas that are good enough that they can produce value that nobody else can produce. A lot of things that Google produces aren't immediately useful to users (take Google Sets for example -- cool, but nobody has an application for it yet).

      Google, unlike Yahoo, demands that all of their data be buildable by computer, that it absolutely scale up with computer hardware.

      Yahoo takes a "what does the customer want" approach, and often sticks a lot of people on things. Yahoo's directory was *possible* at the time Yahoo built it because they were willing to commit a lot of humans to it. A bunch of things, like Yahoo Quotes, are nothing particularly new or interesting, something that nobody but Yahoo can do -- but they are *useful*.

    2. Re:Don't forget the foot soldier by Forbman · · Score: 1

      Since when did Google start running a burger-flipping fast food restaurant chain?

  42. Re:gmail invites /. the gmail server by sndtech · · Score: 1

    not a good idea to post the invites.. lokks like you slashdotted the gmail server

  43. Jumping through hoops by slyckshoes · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Honestly, I was happy when I got a job after college where I could do real work (design/architect & implement) and quit jumping through stupid hoops to prove how smart I was. I've answered my fair share of brain teasers, pattern recognition, cute/stupid questions. This is crap that pisses me off. I'm sure google wants smart people, but they're going to overlook all the people who just get shit done when it needs to be done (and do it well) because they're going for the people who are creative. I'll take someone slightly less smarter with a good work ethic who realizes that work is more than just answering stupid riddles.

    And yes, I may be slightly jealous that I don't work at Google, but honestly this type of thing really turns me off. I guess I'm not what they're looking for then.

    1. Re:Jumping through hoops by fzammett · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You may not be right for Google, but you sound right for the business world.

      You'd be surprised home many of the recently hired at my office are of the Ph.D variety. You'd also be surprised that the vast majority of the projects they are in charge of are failing miserably because they can't simply get things done. Oh, they can draw some kick-ass UML diagrams, and they can use all the latest buzzwords with the utmost proficiency...

      Then there are a couple of us that have been around for 10 years or more with the company. We are the ones that frankly get it done in crunch time. We are the ones that have never been part of a failed project because we busted our asses when it came to it (but just generally worked smart throughout the process so it rarely came to that anyway).

      Sure, I'm bragging a bit here, but it happens to be true. Theory has to meet experience and proven ability, it can't exist in a vacumn. It's nice to hire MENSA members who can rotate geometric shapes in five dimensions in their head and choose the correct figure, but give me the guy who can read through online docs efficiently and can pound out the code when it counts and I don't care if he has a Ph.D or flunked out of high school.

      --
      If a pion (n-) collides with a proton in the woods & noone is there to hear it, does lamdba decay into the source pa
    2. Re:Jumping through hoops by dead+sun · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I've answered my fair share of brain teasers, pattern recognition, cute/stupid questions. This is crap that pisses me off. I'm sure google wants smart people, but they're going to overlook all the people who just get shit done when it needs to be done (and do it well) because they're going for the people who are creative.

      No slight intended, but methinks that maybe you're missing the point of these cute, stupid little brain teaser questions. It's certainly one thing to sit down and slam out something that you either know how to create or can come up with a way to create it relatively easily. It is another thing entirely to solve or approximate a solution to a fundamentally difficult problem and then implement it.

      To put it in vulgar terms, Google likely doesn't need people to just get shit done, they need creative solutions to problems that don't have a straight forward answer. Do you honestly think figuring out how to retrieve highly relevant web pages from the whole net based on one or two silly little keywords, in fractions of a second no less, is something you just sit down and program? Do you even think it's something you can beat the current top players at by simply engineering it with current methods? No, it's far more akin to those little problems you hate so much. Sure, there's naive solutions that give a lackluster result, but to do it well it's all a game of tradeoffs, new and novel approaches, application of known approaches or extensions of known approaches in the right instances, a dash of brute force, and who knows what else. If it was straight forward and something just solved by getting shit done then Google and its staff of many PhDs would likely be vanishing due to the costs of keeping all those PhDs around opposed to another company running slimmer and just doing it. Instead they're number one in the search engine world because of their pioneering efforts.

      The people who enjoy and excel at those questions, seemingly silly on the surface but generally with deeper implications, are the type that are typically good at doing the sort of research that needs to be done to solve the tricky steps.

      Again, none of this is meant as a slight and there really is need for people who are good at architecting and implementing solutions with good work ethics. Many applications are at a point where the technical challenges lie in integration of known solutions and those certainly still need good, hard working architects. On the other hand there's still a definate need for people who like toying with silly questions because that generally translates into enjoying playing with the nuances of more research oriented stuff, simply because they're so often similar. Frankly, if you dislike those stupid little problems then you may well dislike the research experience of bashing your head into brick wall after brick wall trying to come up with a novel solution to a problem which has no real feasible solutions at the moment.

      --
      If not now, when?
    3. Re:Jumping through hoops by Akki · · Score: 1
      It's much harder to find people who are intellegent and creative than to find people who can just get stuff done. You likely need both qualities to be hired at Google.

      Google won't be hiring everyone who does sufficiently well on the GLAT. It's not a horrid idea to try and get smart and creative people interested first, and then weed them out from there.

    4. Re:Jumping through hoops by WindBourne · · Score: 1
      You'd be surprised home many of the recently hired at my office are of the Ph.D variety. You'd also be surprised that the vast majority of the projects they are in charge of are failing miserably because they can't simply get things done.

      hummm, the first thought that comes to mind is It is hard to soar with Eagles, if you work with turkeys

      Just because the projects have failed, it does not mean that it was there fault. Of course, nor does having a PhD mean that you are all that (I have known quite a few from my Acadamia time that were just worthless). But having a PhD does give you a better chance of understanding and solving the problem

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    5. Re:Jumping through hoops by slyckshoes · · Score: 1
      I should clarify. I have nothing against brain teasers and puzzles. After my on-site interviews I'd come back to campus and discuss the various questions with my roommates/enginerd friends. My favorite one is one from HP, though I'm sure it's not 'their' question:


      You have eight balls that are the same in all regards with the exception of one, which is heavier. Given a balance, what is the fewest number of times you can use it to find the heaviest ball? You can place more than one ball on each side of the balance.


      [The first answer is usually three, because the CS mind approaches it like a binary search, just halve the balls you weigh each time (4/side, 2/side, 1/side. But that's not the best answer.]

      My rant, which was unfortunately not very succinct, was really against this mentality that seems to focus only on solving puzzles and fitting some idea of what the interviewer thinks is a geek/cool/techie/mensa personality ("This space is intentionally blank. Please fill it with something that improves upon emptiness.") It seems to me that the culture at Google (and Microsoft and Amazon to some extent) is a one dimensional elitism. I would much rather work at a company where the people are very smart, but they also work hard and aren't stuck on themselves (and I do work at such a place). As fzammett wrote in his response: "Theory has to meet experience and proven ability, it can't exist in a vacumn." And I agree with him completely. I'm sick of feeling like I have to prove my worth by (only) solving puzzles. I agree that they are a valid way to judge thought process and creative ability (which are valuable), but I think that they fall far short of completely evaluating a candidate. You did make the good point that this could just be one way Google filters their applicants, and since they get so many that's understandable.

      Now to answer your rhetorical questions:

      "Do you honestly think figuring out how to retrieve highly relevant web pages from the whole net based on one or two silly little keywords, in fractions of a second no less, is something you just sit down and program?"

      No, of course not. I also don't think that proving you can rotate a dodecahedron in your head means you're any more likely to be able to do it than I am.

      "Do you even think it's something you can beat the current top players at by simply engineering it with current methods?"

      No, I'll have to engineer it better than others have by understanding and elmininating weakness and trying new approaches (in other words, research).

      I apologize if I'm being argumentative, but I'm pissed because I've spent 80 hours this past week reimplementing a bunch of crappy code that others spent 12 months working on.
    6. Re:Jumping through hoops by slyckshoes · · Score: 1

      But having a PhD does give you a better chance of understanding and solving the problem

      How does having a PhD give you a better chance of understanding and solving a problem? What is it about the process of getting your PhD that gives you this better chance? I would argue that there is a set of people who would be better at understanding and solving a problem and that some of them go on to get their PhDs, some of them don't. If someone has a PhD, they are probably more likely to be a member of this set, but nothing in the process of getting the PhD gave them this ability, it merely proved that they had it and could apply it to something no one else had yet (assuming you went to a good school and wrote a good thesis). Or perhaps that's what you were saying and I just misunderstood.

    7. Re:Jumping through hoops by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Put a bit more positively -- the grandparent poster might dick around with interesting problems less at work. But dicking around with ideas (well, as long as they're in the field you're researching) *is* relevant and valid as an activity in research. It's incredibly annoying if you're doing software development to have an employee doing this. If you want a FTP server written, you really don't want your employees trying to see whether they can optimize file copies in a database. At a CS research lab like Google Labs, that might be fantastic if it turns out that that ends up being something that they can use.

      I'd say that a majority of good/interesting ideas get built up and fleshed out when grad students and researchers at labs/universities just start bouncing ideas around, even if they aren't part of their current project.

      If you like CS research, you're likely to go to a conference and come back with a bunch of problems to bouncing around in your head, problems that you didn't immediately drop because they aren't directly applicable to what you're working on.

      If you don't like stubbornly working on a problem that doesn't have any immediate application (and a hell of a lot of research doesn't have immediate application), you just might not like research, you know? I mean, I doubt that most research in mathematics could be considered applied. But research in math has given us a lot of tools -- but these tools are often built years after researchers went through solving problems.

    8. Re:Jumping through hoops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen brother. I remember having the ability to answer some of the math questions on this test, but I also remember being a miserable wretch with poor health and no girlfriend.

    9. Re:Jumping through hoops by cubicledrone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You'd also be surprised that the vast majority of the projects they are in charge of are failing miserably because they can't simply get things done.

      They got a PhD done.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    10. Re:Jumping through hoops by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      What is it about the process of getting your PhD that gives you this better chance?

      Oh, I don't know. Maybe it's the three years of graduate school.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    11. Re:Jumping through hoops by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      So, you think that the average adult who atained an 8'th grade education is perhap more capable of solving problems in the field of genetics than say the average PhD in Bio-Chem? There are probably a few ppl in the world who actually can do that, but very few.

      Years ago, I always said that if I got my own business off the ground, I would mostly hire the 3.5 - 4.0's of the world, but those that have the ability to solve issues. Of course, how do you find these kind of folks? One approach is to run chaefing tests. Google is doing just that. Very Smart. I would also look at low 2.0 grads, but with a broad interest. Why? Because it means they explore. The only way to find that person is to be cross checking where their name or login shows up in SIGs. Then check over their work. As you look at it, see if they can put it together.

      Google is in an interesting position. They can at this moment use the OpenSource world and their DB and SIGs to build a Job Hiring profile for candidates as a product to sell to other companies. Of course, that would show off how much capability they really have in-house to locate information about each of us which would probably terrify the average person out there.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    12. Re:Jumping through hoops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have eight balls that are the same in all regards with the exception of one, which is heavier. Given a balance, what is the fewest number of times you can use it to find the heaviest ball? You can place more than one ball on each side of the balance.

      Select six balls from the eight and split them into two groups (a and b) of three balls.

      If a b then the heavier ball is in b, therefore selecting two of the three balls in b and weighing them will discern the heavier ball.
      If b a then the heavier ball is in a, therefore selecting two of the three balls in a and weighing them will discern the heavier ball.
      If b = a, then comparing the two remaining balls will discern the heavier ball.

      Therefore the minimum number of comparisons needed is two.

    13. Re:Jumping through hoops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a < b
      b < a
      me = stupid

    14. Re:Jumping through hoops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I strongly suspect from your comment that you didn't embark upon one. The curious thing about PhDs is that very, very few candidates actually fail. I think you need to ask exactly what a particular PhD achieved and at what cost (in terms of time and effort.) If you find yourself accepted there are usually only two outcomes: 1) Leave for something more interesting, rewarding or productive. 2) Slowly expand a (usually terminally dull) thesis until such time as it is recommended to be submitted and your supervisor picks a panel to pass you.

    15. Re:Jumping through hoops by smcdow · · Score: 1
      They got a PhD done.

      Great, so they're already burnt out when they start their first job?

      --
      In the course of every project, it will become necessary to shoot the scientists and begin production.
    16. Re:Jumping through hoops by dead+sun · · Score: 1
      Sorry to hear about your reimplementation pains. No problem understanding on the argumentative side of things, it just seemed you disliked the problems as well as the reason for having to answer them. You've made yourself much more clear with this go.

      You do have a point to some extent, though I'm not sure about the one dimensional elitism thing. Maybe I've just seen different people or places using the questions, but it seems like the brain teasers are more a way to get at how you think than a want for the proper answer. I know I've answered a fair share of brain teasers improperly in that I didn't come up with the optimal answer, but by thinking out loud I've managed to come away looking good because I am capable of creative, research oriented thought. Honestly I've never applied to Google, MS, or Amazon, so I don't know if it's a bunch of elitism or not there.

      But I've never seen anything that suggests one method of interview is better than another, either. At least brain teasers expose a subsample of an applicant's thinking process. Honestly curious, how would you conduct an interview?

      --
      If not now, when?
    17. Re:Jumping through hoops by neds_dead · · Score: 1

      I recently did a phone interview with google and this prompted a onsite interview. I quess the phone interview went well! However, the onsite interview was anything but professional.

      5 questions they asked and shortened answers I provided.

      Q1. So, which Google benefits do you find most interesting.

      A1. {Standard Reply}

      R1. Well, we don't offer those here. They are only avaliable at our corporate office location.

      Q2. Oh, I quess I am supposed to ask you where you see yourself, career wise, in five years.

      A2. fsck you: jk, I gave them some bs reply, but wanted to say, "Ill be happy to simply have a job."

      Q3. So why are you applying for a lower level position with 8 years experience.

      A3. IM UNEMPLOYED

      Q4. So why are you applying for a lower level position with 8 years experience.

      A4. Jees, not again. Hey IM UNEMPLOYED

      Q5. So why are you applying for a lower level position with 8 years experience.

      A5. Dude, you are really starting to piss me the hell off. Are you so stupid as to not even understand the state the IT employment situation is in over the last 3 years?

      The answers given were, of coarse, fictitious.

    18. Re:Jumping through hoops by slyckshoes · · Score: 1

      I agree with your middle paragraph completely and in the light of day I do feel like I was a bit of a jerk last night, my apologies.

      With regards to interview methods, I'm afraid I don't have any fantastic insight. Like you said, puzzles are one way to judge someones ability to think creatively, but I think a good interview would involve more than just puzzle solving. In addition I would probably ask a candidate to implement a basic data structure and optimize it for usage X. That would give me an idea of how well they can express in code what they learned in school, and optimizing it for a given usage would tell me if they can adapt what they know to new situations. Following this I might review their code with them to see if they can accept advice and are comfortable bouncing ideas around with others. I'm afraid I don't have any experience interviewing people, but the above approach is what I'd probably try if I had to.

      If you have thoughts or comments, I'd be glad to hear them.

    19. Re:Jumping through hoops by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      So, you think that the average adult who atained an 8'th grade education is perhap more capable of solving problems in the field of genetics than say the average PhD in Bio-Chem? There are probably a few ppl in the world who actually can do that, but very few.

      But you wrote:

      But having a PhD does give you a better chance of understanding and solving the problem

      If Joe gets turned down for a job, takes 3 years off from work to get a PhD, returns and applies for the job, do you think that he would perform the job better with the PhD or if he would have not gotten the PhD and instead was hired the first time and had three years of experience?

      The problem is that "Having a PhD" does not mean that you have a better chance of understanding anything. It may be true that the average PhD holder is a better problem solver than the average high school dropout, but someone that got her PhD would have no lower of an IQ if she had dropped out of high school and never furthered her education.

      I think you are confusing the issues of what the piece of paper means. It is nothing more than a cert, like any other. BS, MBA, MCSE, CCIE, A+, they are all just certs, but with different requirements. I got a job where they needed their employees to have certs for contracts. In one year, I got about 10 certs (Microsoft, CompTIA, Cisco, Compaq, HP and some others from lesser known companies, mainly for security). For nearly everything, I was no better at it after the cert than before. The same is true with my degrees.

    20. Re:Jumping through hoops by fzammett · · Score: 1

      Your right, and it should count for something, but I see too many people that think that one accomplishment automatically entitles them to all the power and sway in an organization. THAT'S what I object to,

      I don't have a Ph.D myself, don't even have a college degree actually (for purely financial reasons, although I'm very slowly working to complete it now in my 30's)... Maybe I would feel differently if my parents had been able to afford to send me to school and I had gotten an advanced degree... I like to think not though.

      --
      If a pion (n-) collides with a proton in the woods & noone is there to hear it, does lamdba decay into the source pa
    21. Re:Jumping through hoops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The curious thing about PhDs is that very, very few candidates actually fail.


      There is selection bias at work. Those who can't hack it usually switch to a Masters or drop out of grad school altogether -- or don't apply to a PhD program in the first place.
    22. Re:Jumping through hoops by dead+sun · · Score: 1
      No need to apologize as no offense was taken. I haven't sunken to thinking everybody on the net is a jerk, and if I had I wouldn't engage in a little friendly debate.

      Anyway, I think you're right in thinking that diversity among questions would be best for an interview. Just asking brain teasers isn't enough to get a view about what somebody thinks of UML for instance. I've never given an interview myself, so I can't speak with authority, but I think I'd try to cover as many bases as possible. My last interview involved writting a few functions and then going over with the interviewer as to how they could be optimized. That was really easy for me, but was pretty decent as far as weeding out weak candidates I guess.

      But I definately would rather answer straight brain teasers than inane questions like "What's your biggest weakness?" At least brain teasers expose something other than can you memorize answers to the worst interview questions ever.

      --
      If not now, when?
    23. Re:Jumping through hoops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can understand the "big picture" of your post, but I'd like to share an experience...

      Recently I was interviewing for a job in the EE field. The first company's engineers asked me some technical questions, but they also started asking me some of the Microsoftish questions (like the pool ball question that someone here posted) expecting answers ASAP. I was not at all expecting these kinds of questions (nor the silly time pressure that they put on me) since the position was for hardware design and not like certain types of CS jobs where the "discrete math" thinking comes in handy.

      I was so thrown off balance by the dumb and irrelevant questions that I ended up doing quite badly on the interview and missed all the relevant technical questions I *knew*.

      Contrast this to the company that I am now employed with; they asked me to solve some real-world problems, some requiring higher level thinking (architecture, system level design) and some requiring very low-level experience (inspecting memory dumps, designing power supplies, etc). And although they had a rigorous interview process which was highly technical, they gave me the time and space to solve the problems understanding that not everyone thinks on the spot.

      At the end of my interview with the second company I was a made a very flattering and formal offer ON THE SPOT -- something unheard of in my many years of working as an EE.

      Both companies do similar kinds design work and I would have had similars positions in either, but one company asked inane and irrelevant questions and the other one checked my experience, knowledge level, interaction with people and gave me the personal space to answer any questions.

      The point is that using one "limited" metric to gauage people is very foolish. I'm sure that there's some EE out there who probably interviewd with the first company and solved their dumb Microsoft problems but that's no guarantee of his hardware design skills.

      The same even goes for people in the CS field -- being able to create and implement algorithms, utilize/create data structures and come up with "creative solutions" usually has nothing to do with rotating polyhedrons in your head or writing haikus.

      The bottom line in all of these questions is : Can you think? And that can be determined in less obnoxious ways...

    24. Re:Jumping through hoops by dead+sun · · Score: 1
      I'm not saying that these questions are the end all be all of interviews, just that they have their place. Their place, when administered properly, is to inspect how a person reasons given a little time and a tricky question. Even showing a good, honest line of thought but arriving at a suboptimal answer is sufficient, when the questions are administered correctly. People need a little time to think things over, and generally after a little quick thinking the proper way to answer is to start thinking out loud while arriving at whatever answer or answers you come to.

      I fully agree that there needs to be diversity in an interview, and go into that in further discussion with the original poster that I replied to. There needs to be some testing beyond just, "Are you creative?" as well.

      However, look at the bright side in your case. The silly questions were asked in an incompetent way. Think how much design work may have been presented to you in that way had you actually received a job there? Unreasonable deadlines that are impossible to finish on time. It was probably the mentality of that workplace and not the questions themselves. Instead you found a job where the people actually appreciate your knowledge. I'd bet that if they'd have asked the same questions they wouldn't have rushed you and wouldn't have been fixated on the optimal answer in that short of a timespan. Properly done they should be a way of guaging how a person thinks when confronted with a problem that is too hard to solve in a short time, showing the reasoning process.

      And given the choice between a random creative question and "What's your one biggest weakness?" I'll take the hard creative problem anyday.

      --
      If not now, when?
  44. Another one by elid · · Score: 1

    I also got a copy of this "test" in Dr. Dobb's.

  45. Not Even... by Code+Dark · · Score: 0

    Not even the Slashdot Effect... just a boring old 404. If anyone has a link that works, please, let us know! Kind of mean of the host to remove the file after it's been slashdotted...

    --
    - Code Dark
  46. Re:DUPE! ? by LostCluster · · Score: 1

    If the insert asked the same questions as the billboard test, then that would have been a dupe for sure... same message being delivered over different media is still the same message.

  47. Or even off /. by Jurisenpai · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, especially if your boyfriend won't get off slashdot in the first place!

    Me: Honey, come to bed.
    Him: Just one more SCO article to read through, I promise!
    Me: ...

    --
    "Equal bytes for women!"
    1. Re:Or even off /. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      If you were smart, you owuld dump the guy who read slashdot before coming to bed when you ask.

      Really now, you can do better. My wife did.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Or even off /. by ChiPHeaD23 · · Score: 4, Funny

      So cut out the suspense, who did she dump you for?

    3. Re:Or even off /. by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1

      Some guy that lives in their closet.

    4. Re:Or even off /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great reference!

  48. How would others solve this one? by baywulf · · Score: 1

    WWWDOT - GOOGLE = DOTCOM

    If I were to actually solve it, I would write a small program to try all possible solutions. Given that there are 9 variables between 0 and 9, it wouldn't take long on an average pc.

    1. Re:How would others solve this one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrote a small program (next_permutation() is your friend)...

      777589 - 188103 = 589486

    2. Re:How would others solve this one? by xchino · · Score: 1

      uhm, there are 8 variables between 0 and 9. there are 10 variables including 0 and 9.

      --
      Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.
    3. Re:How would others solve this one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there are not necessarily 9 variables. what about bases other than 10. hex comes to mind...

    4. Re:How would others solve this one? by mothz · · Score: 1

      Easy. The instructions are nonspecific, so assume each letter represents a number, rather than just a digit. Let O (the variable) = 0 (the number).

      0*(W*W*W*D*T) - 0*(G*G*L*E) = 0*(D*T*C*M) for any values of W, D, T, G, L, E, D, C, and M.

    5. Re:How would others solve this one? by aaza · · Score: 2, Interesting
      A far more interesting problem (well, in my opinion, anyway):
      TEN
      TEN
      FORTY
      -----
      SIXTY
      Write it out, right justify it (I can't get /. to do that), try it.

      Each letter equals one digit, there are ten different letters. Solve without using a computer. It is possible, and can be considered easy if you can work out how to record what letters can and can't be which digits.

      I have nothing against using a program to solve this, but it defeats the purpose (which is to see who can logically solve - not brute force - the puzzle).

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.
      In practice, however, there is.
    6. Re:How would others solve this one? by Infinityis · · Score: 1

      Yeah, a few minutes of working it out gets it...in this case, you start by noticing that E and N have to be one of 5 or 0, and then you realize which is which. After that, you see the most significant digits on "forty" are all different from "sixty" which implies that there are carries on each, and there are upper limits on each carry (if you at any time say "carry the 7", you've made a mistake)...

      Bottom line (in the order of discovery), N=0, E=5, O=9, I=1, T=8, then all together you get R=7, X=4, F=2, S=3, and Y=6)

      850
      850
      29786
      -----
      31486

      Also, the right justification was easy, just use "Plain Old Text" and put in the spaces...

  49. Best post ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I salute you, sir.

  50. "test" breaches Australian law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was quite stunned to see the form in my magazine.

    The job screening exam clearly breaches Australia's anti-discriminiation laws (simplifying somewhat, Google is asking some questions unrelated to my potential performance as an employee, therefore the questions must be for some discriminatory purpose). I'd be surprised if the same were not true of the US.

    What this screening exam did for me was to confirm Google's corporate stupidity.

    Google is now first on the list of places I'd never want to work -- what concern is it of their's what I do with my spare time.

    I've no idea what Linux Journal thought they were doing by accepting the insert.

    1. Re:"test" breaches Australian law by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The job screening exam clearly breaches Australia's anti-discriminiation laws (simplifying somewhat, Google is asking some questions unrelated to my potential performance as an employee, therefore the questions must be for some discriminatory purpose). I'd be surprised if the same were not true of the US.

      What this screening exam did for me was to confirm Google's corporate stupidity.


      And so now, a potential employer is aware that you're the sort of person that likes pulling out obscure rules to be an asshole rather than appreciating humor. The sort of person that files lawsuits and makes everyone else miserable due to all the stupid policy in place to avoid liability.

      Google is now first on the list of places I'd never want to work -- what concern is it of their's what I do with my spare time.

      Then the screening mechanism has worked well. It's a good bet that the Google people don't want to work with you either. Heck, I wouldn't want to work with you.

      I hate anti-discrimination laws. I'm all for employers discriminating if they want to. If they make stupid policy, it's a pretty good bet that they'll go under -- you don't like hiring women? Fine. You've just cut your potential employee base in half. Have fun trying to outdo your competitor, who hasn't placed that restriction on himself. I disagree with the Libertarians about a lot of things, but I do think that the Invisible Hand does a pretty good job of solving problems relating to employers doing self-damaging things.

    2. Re:"test" breaches Australian law by gtoomey · · Score: 1
      You speak total nonsense. Australian discrimination law stops you from discriminating in relation to sexual orientation, religion, etc. Apart from that you can ask any question you like

      Numerous empolyers ask you to take standardised tests.

    3. Re:"test" breaches Australian law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've no idea what Linux Journal thought they were doing by accepting the insert.

      Earning 50c/copy perhaps?

    4. Re:"test" breaches Australian law by Forbman · · Score: 1

      the "invisible hand" works OK, when the majority (i.e, the side making money) is on the "right".

      In this case, if most of the companies making $$$ are only hiring white males with irish last names, well, everyone else is screwed, because the minority companies [sic] can only hire a very small number of people who might not be white, male and/or have irish last names.

      Sort of like buying organic foods and produce.
      Until Kraft Holdings, and a couple of other majorly big food makers go only organic, organic foods will still be a niche product, although they are getting more and more mainstream.

      Organic produce requires more labor, so eventually the smaller organic farms will stop scaling because they will hit limits that non-organic farmers don't have, unless some of those limits are legislated on non-organic farmers (i.e., banning pesticides, herbicides, GMO'd seed, etc).

      I don't see how it would be possible to raise organic oats for all of General Mills' needs for Cheerios in one year. Supply isn't there, and if it was, the price point would probably double the price of a box of Cheerios, and Wal-Mart would not be too happy with that.

    5. Re:"test" breaches Australian law by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      ...Google is asking some questions unrelated to my potential performance as an employee...

      Perhaps Google has found that a sense of humour and a life outside of draconian regulations are important traits in an employee?

      In the real world, when employees are terminated (excluding the case of mass layoffs), it's not usually due to their incompetence. When an employee is fired (sacked, let go, 'dehired'), it's usually due to interpersonal conflicts. An important part of any interview (whether explicitly stated or not) is an evaluation of whether or not an employee will get along with the rest of the team. A highly qualified asshole might be very productive on his own, but might also result in a drop in productivity from everyone he works with. It makes sense for Google to try to see if people will respond well to their unusual corporate culture.

      Obviously their screening works, since the parent doesn't want to work there.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    6. Re:"test" breaches Australian law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The job screening exam clearly breaches Australia's anti-discriminiation laws

      Could you explain which question is "discriminatory" in the test ? (this is not a retorical question)

      I don't see anything that could be used for discrimination...
      (I live in Europe, here maybe things are somewhat different)

    7. Re:"test" breaches Australian law by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Perhaps Google has found that a sense of humour and a life outside of draconian regulations are important traits in an employee?

      Yes, but it is illegal to ask about life outside of draconian regulations. You can't ask age. You can't ask marital status. You can't ask about children. Some hobbies may be off limits. So, it is gotten to the point where any questions you ask have to be work related only, or they may be seen as discriminatory. One asked about leisure time. That is a discriminitory question. Someone may spend time with the wife and kids, or want to go to the hills to worship God, or go to the hills to kill pigs and string them up by their intestines and use them as pinatas. If they aren't hired because they have a family or weird religious beliefs, that is illegal. As such, it is considered illegal to ask a question that could be used to determine such personal information.

      Don't blame me. The US Federal Government wrote the regulations. Google is breaking them. I'm just informing you what the standard practices are in hiring and the intrepretations of law that apply. (and they apparently break Australian law as well)

    8. Re:"test" breaches Australian law by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Could you explain which question is "discriminatory" in the test ? (this is not a retorical question)

      Pretty much all of them that ask "what would you do" in a non work situation. I'd waste more time with the individual questions if you weren't an AC (since I don't know if you are even going to read this). If you want an numerical explanation, reply to this and ask me again.

    9. Re:"test" breaches Australian law by lambadomy · · Score: 1

      How many people are there that are not white or don't have irish last names? Am I supposed to believe that, even in this world where ONLY those companies are making any money, that everyone else will, instead of making their own companies for the other 99% of the population, just starve or have nothin and let these irishmen own them? It just isn't going to happen. The whole point is that they fundamentally aren't screwed, so long as there isn't something other than the market (government regulation/whatever) influencing who can and cannot make a company and sell things.

      Your Kraft holdings example suffers from what many anti-libertatian arguments do - the assumption that Kraft holdings would even exist in it's present form if it wasn't for how much the governments of the world subsidised it or its industries. Perhaps it would, perhaps it would be even worse, but the point is that it has not been created by a true free market system.

      A better example (to go with your original race arguments) would be major league baseball in the 1950's. As much as people liked to discriminate, and as much as they tried to keep the game "white" , eventually teams really had no choice but to start employing minority baseball players because they were good players. If they hadn't, they eventually would have been overcome by leagues that would employ these minorities, because the quality of the product is what mattered to people.

    10. Re:"test" breaches Australian law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google is asking some questions unrelated to my potential performance as an employee

      Given that Google is looking to hire creative people with strong mathematical ability, can you prove that the questions are unrelated to the job?

      Notice how there's no actual or implied job offer?

      Not to mention that they reserve the option of giving any applicant a temp position, to check out whether or not that person will be an asset. If you get a job there and turn out to be a bluffer or sociopath, they have the option to simply not renew your temp contract. Or transfer you to sales :)
  51. Optimal team size... by jackb_guppy · · Score: 1

    The number of people that fit into one car.

    This way all can travel to lunch together and are able to keep working.

  52. Re:Nice Troll! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no, but we've signed you up to 100 free pr0n pics an hour and unlimited spamvertisements for life

  53. umm, he is correct. by geekoid · · Score: 1

    1/Rt = 1/R1 + 1/R2 + 1/R3

    So, in this case, lets say that All resistors (R) are one.

    1/Rt = 1/1 + 1/1 + 1/1

    which makes Rt 3

    1/3 = .333 forever.

    Now lets add a resistor:
    1/Rt = 1/R1 + 1/R2 + 1/R3 + 1/R4
    1/4
    Rt = .25

    see how it gets smaller every time you add one?

    SO if you continually add one, its continually gets smaller.

    So the correct answer is:
    1/Rt = 1/R1 + 1/R2 + 1/R3 ... 1/n

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:umm, he is correct. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, here's another example. Rather than a knight's move away, measure even closer... diagonally. Obviously, this will be less resistance.

      This page shows the solution as 2/pi... much greater than zero. So a knight's move away will be >2/pi.

    2. Re:umm, he is correct. by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      Sorry, this is not quite correct.

      Your formula

      1/R_t = \sum 1/R_n

      *is* correct, but all the R_n are not 1. You have to go from A to B via a knight's move, so this is 3 resistors away.

  54. Re:DUPE! ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So much anger. You sound like a gentleman that could benefit from some more introspection.

  55. SPOILER: knights move resistance solution by happynut · · Score: 1
    Don't think chess board: think infinite 2d matrix, with many, many parallel paths. The chess move part just means three units away (two over and one up, or one of the reflections of this move).

    Use the formula for combining parallel resistances: 1/(1/R1 + 1/R2 + ... + 1/RN) So you have 1/(1/3 + 1/3 + 1/3 + 1/4 * (# of 4 -distance-paths) + 1/(# 5-distance paths)).

    The denominator grows faster than the harmonic series (1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + ...) which grows to infinity, so the total resistance (1/infinity) is zero.

    1. Re:SPOILER: knights move resistance solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This would work if all the paths were parallel, but they aren't. Even the 3-distance paths aren't parallel, since the Z-shaped path shares a resistor with each L-shaped path.

      I haven't figured out the solution yet, but the resistance between any two nonadjacent vertices in the lattice cannot be less than 1/2 ohm. If the resistors that don't touch those vertices become 0 ohm conductors, then the resistance becomes precisely 1/2 ohm.

    2. Re:SPOILER: knights move resistance solution by nukeindia.com · · Score: 1
      The denominator grows faster than the harmonic series (1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + ...) which grows to infinity, so the total resistance (1/infinity) is zero.

      Wrong. 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + ... + 1/inf is NOT equal to infinity. And the answer is not too large either. Might be around 2 or 3, cause the further right you move in the series you are actually adding zero to the total.

      The answer to the grid problem is not zero either.
    3. Re:SPOILER: knights move resistance solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Wrong. 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + ... + 1/inf is NOT equal to infinity.

      Yes it is.

      1/2 + (1/3 + 1/4) + (1/5 + 1/6 + 1/7 + 1/8) + ... > 1/2 + 1/2 + 1/2 + ... = infinity.

      You're right about the answer to the grid problem not being zero though.

    4. Re:SPOILER: knights move resistance solution by ASkGNet · · Score: 1

      Wrong. 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + ... + 1/inf is NOT equal to 2 or 3 either. 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + ... 'equals' to Infinity because the series does not converge. Easy proof -

      The infitite sum converges iff the series of partial sums (S_n = 1/2 + ... + 1/n) converges, and it converges to the same value. (read it up in your calculus book)

      Let's assume S_n converges. Iff S_n converges, it is a Cauchy series, and as such, fulfills the Cauchy criterion (again, read it up in your calculus book). Therefore, for every Eps > 0, exists such P so that for every n,m > P
      |S_n - S_m| < Eps

      We will show this being incorrect in our case.
      Let us take an arbitrary n and m = 2n

      |S_n - S_m| = 1/n + 1/(n+1) + ... + 1/2n >
      > 1/2n + 1/2n + ... + 1/2n = n/2n = 1/2

      Therefore, we see that if we take Eps = 0.25 (for example), there's no such P so that for EVERY n,m > P |S_n - S_m| < 0.25

      Therefore S_n does not converge -> the infinite sum does not converge. And since we showed that for every n the sum of n following members > 1/2, it's trivial to see that the infinite sum -> inf

      (Iff = If and only if, for those among us who are mathematically challenged)

    5. Re:SPOILER: knights move resistance solution by happynut · · Score: 1
      Well, many text books and other places on the web seem to think that the harmonic series does not converge; that the sum is infinite.

      Try googling harmonic series limit or just look at formula three on this page

      This page gives an explanation why, and links to a strategy for a proof.

      Wolfram has a fuller explanation

    6. Re:SPOILER: knights move resistance solution by fymidos · · Score: 1

      1/2+1/3+1/4+.. grows to infinity as surely as
      1/3+1/4 is greater than 1/2

      --
      Washington bullets will simply be known as the "Bulle
    7. Re:SPOILER: knights move resistance solution by nukeindia.com · · Score: 1

      No prove can be more clear than this one for the non-mathematically challenged persons like me.

      /Kicks self for cyring fool and grabs the dusty math book. Murmurs s***.

  56. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  57. Image Scans of Test by ticklemeozmo · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    When modding "Informative", please make sure it both has a source and IS actually informative.
    1. Re:Image Scans of Test by pyce · · Score: 1

      i get this itching sensation, you know, that there jpegs somehow exploit a security hole in wxp. thank you so very much, sucker...

      --
      Hellenologophobia, n. -- a fear of Greek terms or complex terminology
  58. Re:Nice Troll! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey fagnuts, http://isnoop.net/gmailomatic.php

  59. Re:GLAT - sample questions (spoiler) by wildsurf · · Score: 1
    What number comes next in the sequence: 10, 9, 60, 90, 70, 66, ? A) 96 B) 10 to the 100th power C) Either of the above D) None of the above

    C: Either of the above.

    Simply spell out the sequence:
    ten, nine, sixty, ninety, seventy, sixty-six...

    and look at the number of letters used:

    3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8...

    The next item must clearly have nine letters, so either "ninety-six" or "one Googol" will work. (or "seventeen", or "fifty-four", etc.)
    --
    Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
  60. Re:Way to go, michael. by jdog1016 · · Score: 1

    I personally think that is slashdot's fault for not using a cache instead of just linking. THEY can obviously handle the bandwidth. Half the sites that can linked to, however, cannot. Yeah, I guess they've got a right to link, but if they had any considerations at all for their readers, they would consider using a cache. After all, if we can't read the news, what good is it to link to it... And yeah, they've got a right to link, but if they know that its going to take down a site, why not find another way?

  61. NREMT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's because NREMT charges extra for the retest. Nothing like making an extra buck off the same customer taking the same test without telling you what you missed the first time. It's a hell of a racket for those bastards.

  62. zawinski's overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he came in late to lucid emacs and it died shortly thereafter. he came to Netscape and it died shortly thereafter. hmmm...see a pattern?

    1. Re:zawinski's overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm...I got it:

      As soon as it can send email, it's dead.

  63. Here are the images... by Argyle · · Score: 4, Informative

    You guys killed my site, but I've put them up on another domain I have.

    Please mirror the images. Thanks.

    GLAT Images

    --
    nuclear iraq bioweapon encryption cocaine korea terrorist
  64. mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good point. I don't like these kinds of Evil HR quiz things. It's very annoying and therefore Evil; meaning that these quizes break the Google golden rule prior to going public: Don't be Evil. Well that didn't last, did it?

  65. My Google recruiting experience.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I recently interviewed at Google and got an offer, but didn't go. I think they sort of dropped the ball.

    At the risk of sounding arrogant (and, there's no way I'd post this if I weren't doing so anonymously), I was a very qualified candidate. I solved all their puzzles and made an incredibly positive impression on everyone there I visited. Simiarly, Google made a very positive impression on me. It's been my dream to work for them for many years and I finally had the opportunity!

    Then, things sort of turned a little bit worse. I was also being courted by a Very Large Software Company. VLSC also made me an offer. It was better, but the money wasn't the issue. Every few days, someone from VLSC would call me to tell me how important it was that I go to work for them. How excited they were about me and extolling the virtues of VLSC.

    First my future boss called. His boss called. HIS boss called. And *that* guy's boss called! At this point it was someone very high up in the company. All of them had the same message: we really want you to come here. They started sending little gifts to my house.

    Meanwhile, I heard nothing from Google. Their recruiter called me occasionally but never replied to my emails or indicated having read them on phone calls. I asked if it would be possible to speak to anyone else in Google who I might speak with about the type of work I'd be doing or the people I'd be working with. No one ever contacted me. Now, they were getting ready for their IPO so I suppose they had better things to think about, but the overwhelming impression I got was "Your loss if you don't work here. Whatever, come if you want." Meanwhile, VLSC made it clear it would be *their* loss if I didn't work there and that they'd do everything they could to make it the best place ever to work.

    It was incredibly painful to have to give up my dream of working for Google. But ultimately, VLSC convinced me that they were more excited about the work I could do and that I'd have a better opportunity there to do it.

    I really wanted to want Google. They made it very hard.

    I hope someone from Google reads this and maybe can pass this on to HR folks. It's not something I feel comfortable attaching my name to.

    1. Re:My Google recruiting experience.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. So you can figure out their puzzles, but can't figure out that it's all about what you do. What do you pick if you have the choice:
      a) Flip burgers at Burger Queen and be told continuously how they appreciate you flipping burgers for them
      b) Work for Google and get a thumbs up when you do something good

    2. Re:My Google recruiting experience.... by zuesse · · Score: 1

      Did you miss the point. Have you even graduated yet. Have you even had the chance to work for someone who doesn't know your name after 2 years. Grow up.

      I'm not the guy who posted the original message but I have lived his experience elsewhere.

      If the pricetag for one third of your life is measured only by money, you come rather cheaply.

      That's all. Just my 2 cents.

      --


      What great fortune for rulers that men do not think.
  66. Imposter! by Argyle · · Score: 1

    It's pistols at dawn for your besmirching of my honor.

    --
    nuclear iraq bioweapon encryption cocaine korea terrorist
  67. nmoog... by Argyle · · Score: 1

    nmoog, you ignorant slut.

    I'm good enough, I'm smart enough, and dog-gone it, people like me.

    --
    nuclear iraq bioweapon encryption cocaine korea terrorist
  68. Previous Google strategy by Animats · · Score: 1

    If you looked up advanced computer science topics like "formal verification", you'd see a Google ad.

  69. What if God was one of us? by Old+Telco+Guy · · Score: 1

    I always have trouble with those quizzes. Type A PhDs do well at them. So I guess you're not interested in me, Google, cause I have other skills.

    Like I've started several companies and made most of them successful. I've solved some incredibly hard technical problems and earned real patents (not the new fake kind) for my work. So you probably wouldn't be interested in me, Google. I wouldn't wear black and drink 4$ coffee and be mathy in an eclectic way like you dream your employees could be.

    But if you guys want to do something more interesting than search, and can take a break from your mathematical one-upsmanship, let me know and we'll talk.

    1. Re:What if God was one of us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Type A PhDs do well at them

      No, they don't. Type A PhD's do well at buying BMWs, and muscling in on business deals.

      They're quite clearly screening for people with asperger's syndrome or the INTP personality type. It's polar opposite from the agression and competitiveness that comes with being "Type A".

    2. Re:What if God was one of us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, for having a PHD, you sound like a brat.

    3. Re:What if God was one of us? by jcuervo · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't wear black and drink 4$ coffee and be mathy in an eclectic way like you dream your employees could be.
      I would, but I suck at math.
      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
    4. Re:What if God was one of us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If God was one of us, I think he could pass Google's mathy quizzes.

  70. Orkut... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...is a plural form of 'orgasm' in the Finnish language, and translates "all of the orgasms."

  71. Re:Nice Troll! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It may be a nice troll, but the fact is, Google's motto "Don't be evil" is in direct conflict with the fact that they just went public.

    A public corporation is mandated by law to make as much money as possible (i.e. accountable to the shareholders). Remember in Fight Club when he describes how the car company figures its recalls? They do it that way because its the law.

    Welcome to America...

  72. But is this counterproductive? by complexmath · · Score: 1

    Frankly, I've become a bit put off by all of these aptitude tests Google has been assaulting us with. The method of advertising has given me the impression that Google lacks any real direction or organization but is banking on its collection of brilliant people to do something wonderful. There was a time that working at Google sounded kind of interesting, but that time has passed.

  73. In Dr. Dobb's Journal too by TimMann · · Score: 1

    This month's Dr. Dobb's Journal has the Google Labs aptitude test too.

  74. 199981 by stripmarkup · · Score: 1

    A quick 10-line c program gives this answer.

    --
    See charts for twitter trends on Trendistic
    1. Re:199981 by kghougaard · · Score: 1

      I think you made an error, or did'nt leave your code running long enough. If your number is a solution to f(n)=n, then the next 8 numbers are also solutions, because the next numbers has exactly one 1-digit.

      The solution _probably_ lies somewhere passed 10^10, since the "average" number below 10^10 has less than one 1-digit, whlie larger numbers has more than one 1-digit. Which means that f(x)1 for x>10^10, i.e. the slope is greater than 1, which means that f(x)>x for x>>10^10.

      Somewhere the lines f(x) and x cross, but since it is a step function, they could cross without f(x)=x happening. That I dont know, but my guess would be somewhere passed 10^10

      Ougar

      --
      He, who dies with the most toys, wins
    2. Re:199981 by stripmarkup · · Score: 2, Informative

      So why is that a problem with my solution? 199981 is the first one, 199982 is another, etc, but they are only looking for the first.

      --
      See charts for twitter trends on Trendistic
    3. Re:199981 by kghougaard · · Score: 1

      Ups... My mistake

      The problem, apparently, is my lack of english skills.

      I thought they wanted the second-largest number to match, which is quite a large number....

      So, nothing wrong with your solution. But hey, this is slashdot, so not reading the story is almost mandatory :-)

      Ougar

      --
      He, who dies with the most toys, wins
  75. these Google ads are starting to annoy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about others, but I truly hope this is the last "Google job recruiting" Slashdot article.

  76. Tricky Bastards by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you picked (a) they'd fail you because you came from some crappy place called Standford rather than Stanford

  77. Veil of Ignorance by cakoose · · Score: 1

    Look it up.

    1. Re:Veil of Ignorance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Look it up.

      Where? (Or do I have to look that up, too?)

    2. Re:Veil of Ignorance by cakoose · · Score: 1

      Anywhere. Just in case you really don't know how to look something up, here you go.

  78. Re:Is anyone else...-Tell that to this guy.... by iamcf13 · · Score: 0

    There are also a number of people who create a fictitious being and place where they will live out eternity in bliss (religion).


    Tell that to this guy.

    A lot of people died to make sure this story got passed down unchanged to the present day.

    All things considered equal, people will not knowingly die for something they know not to be true....


    Since it is illegal to test people's intelligence in the U.S. for a job


    I hear this is being done out in 'resumeland'. That is, the HR personnel get so many resumes for a job opening they simply discard resumes that have spelling errors or other 'minor' problems with them--sounds like another form of intelligence test.

    Even 'McJob' applications are an itelligence test--if you are able to fill it out properly and the HR personnel like what they see on it, you 'might' get called in for an interview!...
  79. Answers (some) by currivan · · Score: 1

    I was hoping to solve them all, bu it's getting late and no one will see the post if I wait too much longer:

    Solve this cryptic equation, realizing of course that values for M and E could be interchanged. No leading zeroes are allowed.
    WWWDOT - GOOGLE = DOTCOM

    777589 - 188103 = 589486

    What's the next line?
    1
    1 1
    2 1
    1 2 1 1
    1 1 1 2 2 1

    3 1 2 2 1 1 (run length encoding)

    How many different ways can you color an icosahedron with one of three colors on each face?

    3 if you read this pedantically. Or 3^20. No one said it was regular.

    It's 2pm on a sunny Sunday afternoon in the Bay Area. You're minutes from the Pacific Ocean, redwood forest hiking trails and world class cultural attractions. What do you do?

    Wonder what happened to all the traffic.

    What will be the next great improvement in search technology?

    When they stop indexing blogs.

    Consider a function which, for a given whole number n, returns the number of ones required when writing out all numbers between 0 and n. For example, f(13) = 6. Notice that f(1) = 1. What is the next largest n such that f(n) = n?

    10,000,000,002
    (10^(n+1) has n/10+1 1s, as each digit is a 1 1/10th the time)

    'Tis known in refined company, that choosing K things out of N can be done in ways as many as choosing N minus K from N: I pick K, you the remaining. Find though a cooler bijection, where you show a knack uncanny, of making your choises contain all K of mine. Oh, for pedantry: let K be no more than half N.

    I'm not sure what this means. My attempt at parsing it is: find x
    such that n-k choose x equals n choose k. That has no solution.
    Consider 6 choose 2 for n and k.

    What number comes next in the sequence: 10, 9, 60, 90, 70, 66, ?
    A) 96
    (Largest number that has n letters in its name)

    Knight's resistors isn't 0, btw. Consider it without any resistors except the four around the voltage source, with the rest shorted. It's obviously not zero, all current passes through one of those resistors.

    1. Re:Answers (some) by Billy+Donahue · · Score: 1


      Pedantic? You want pedantic?
      You CAN'T HANDLE pedantic...

      Not all icosahedrons are 20-sided. To wit:
      http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Icosahedron.html

      --
      -- The Funk, The Whole Funk, And Nothing But The Funk
    2. Re:Answers (some) by Billy+Donahue · · Score: 1

      Knight's resistors isn't 0, btw.


      No, it's (4/pi - 1/2) ohms.
      --
      -- The Funk, The Whole Funk, And Nothing But The Funk
    3. Re:Answers (some) by currivan · · Score: 1

      You misread the page, those all have 20 faces total. Unless you were kidding.

      "An icosahedron is a not-necessarily regular 20-faced polyhedron. Examples include the regular icosahedron, Jessen's orthogonal icosahedron, rhombic icosahedron, 18-sided prism, 19-sided pyramid, or 10-sided dipyramid."

  80. Re:Is anyone else...-Tell that to this guy.... by xQx · · Score: 1

    I hear a lot of people died in iraq too... does that mean they believed george told the truth? .. Food for thought.

  81. Not only on Linux Journal by antoy · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It's on this month's Dr. Dobb's too.

  82. Google presentation or recruitment session? by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I attended a Google presentation at SUCON where a Google drone held a very shallow presentation of the tech stuff behind Google.

    In a nutshell, he hinted that they use Linux, that they have loads of cheap systems which 1) they expect will break down and 2) are cheap to fix, that a large part of the systems indexes content and that another large part of the systems serves content. And Google is hiring.

    He constantly repeated that because they went public he was not allowed to be specific. And he wasn't. There was a watchful Google woman that apparently took note of everything that went on and assisted at the proclamations of secrecy. And Google is hiring.

    Then he touched the Google policy and hinted that Google has a sort of principle of "not being evil". In my words, this means Google has considered being evil and decided not to be (maybe for the time being). Did I mention that Google is hiring?

    Oh yes and they were hiring. Yes hiring, hiring and hiring. There were even forms (as if the audience didn't know where to look for them on Google). And of course he couldn't say anything about the rates, due to... But Google is hiring.

    At the end of the presentation I thought:
    • Google kicks ass in low cost high performance computing.
    • Gmail will give them experience in how to handle confidentially in low cost high performance computing.
    • They (and not RedHat) have everything in order to become the next MS. (Monopoly on a technology and loads of quickly earned bucks.)
    • I guess that their going public results in less fun at the company.
    • Why do they need/want more money? They are doing OK as it is!
    • I decided to let Google have loads of fun with their money and not to take anything of that away from them by applying.
    • Oh yeah, they probably want the best for the lowest price. Both in HW and HR.
    And not to forget: Google is hiring.
    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    1. Re:Google presentation or recruitment session? by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

      Sorry for replying to my own post.

      I forgot to mention that the Google drone even refused to tell us which database they use. What's the best bang for the buck in databases? (But they are hiring.)

      --

      I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  83. Google has more marketing guys than programmers by tines · · Score: 1

    M: Quick! Give me something "cool" I can use.
    P: Well, what about euler's constant.
    M: That sounds great! Let's do a whole campaign about it. After all, here at google we get only the top google-ish people.
    P: That's another work for proactive no? Seesh

  84. Here's the problem and the solution - WWWDOT by Gopal.V · · Score: 2, Informative
    777589 - 188103 == 589486
    > W == 7 D == 5 O == 8 T == 9 G == 1 L == 0 E == 3 M == 6 C == 4

    777589 - 188106 == 589483
    > W == 7 D == 5 O == 8 T == 9 G == 1 L == 0 E == 6 M == 3 C == 4

    Took 8 minutes to code, and 4 to run :)

    Lameness filter won't let me post it - view it here

    1. Re:Here's the problem and the solution - WWWDOT by tapper_of_spines · · Score: 1

      Actually, when I did it that way I got at least 20 valid combinations. I don't think that is correct, since it's not unique. You probably have to change bases.

    2. Re:Here's the problem and the solution - WWWDOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, C and M do not appear in the difference part of the equation. Therefore, there is no reason to test for every permutation of C and M.

      All you need to do is to generate every permutation of WWWDOT and GOOGLE, and then calculate the differences of them.

      Then, make sure that the characters that reappear in the difference match as they were defined above (D, O, and T). C and M are "don't cares".

      This reduces the complexity of the problem by a factor of 100!

      Also, your solution discards assignments where two or more letters have the same numeric value -- this isn't forbidden in the problem statement -- only that numbers may not have leading zeroes (W and G cannot equal zero).

  85. I'll bite... by Divlje+Jagode · · Score: 1
    Sure you need to bust your ass off to finish your Ph.D, especially when your funding is about to dry out (always a good inscentive, that...). But sometimes, all it takes is a caring supervisor who will most likely pre-chew the work for you and all you need to do in the end is to fill-in the blanks in his/her bright idea.

    Does filling-in some blanks make you a genius of some sort? Is that worth a doctorate degree? Not sure... In Soviet Russia, you are not a doctor until you have a proven record of papers in your field. Handing in a thesis makes you a good candidate (the russian term) for being a doctor but don't expect to become one until your mid 40s.

    In any case, working on your own is not ideal either. Fsckin supervisor was never there when I needed him and it's taken me 3 years of my time after my Ph.D to understand the maths I could see myself using all along. Oh well, if all goes well, I'll get a couple of papers out and a pat on the head... happy days.

  86. I'm in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was the funniest test I've ever taken. I guess they were most impressed by the first 100 Pi digits I wrote in the blank space (page 2).

  87. I love my job but I don't live it. by FatSean · · Score: 0

    I have other interests that require time to pursue. I'm sorry you are so one dimensional.

    --
    Blar.
    1. Re:I love my job but I don't live it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I have other interests that require time to pursue. I'm sorry you are so one dimensional.

      If you were good enough at these other interests that people would pay you to do them, you'd be even happier. Sorry you're not good at your interests.

  88. Is this really recruiting... by ndykman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm a bit skeptical. Well, maybe they only took the first X amount of these things in, because it won't take long for all the answer to get posted. Seems more like marketing to me. Kind of "we have the smartest people, aren't we cool."

    Of course, there is lots of kinds of intelligences. I read the Emotional Intellgence book, and it was a bit of an eye-opener. Yep, there's all kinds of smart.

    I hate to admit it, but there may be a reason that some of those blasted sales and marketing guys and gals make serious money. We like to think that it's lucky, or BS, or kissing ass (and it could be), but sometimes, it's because "people smarts" can get you far.

    Sure, this makes sense for a research lab starting up, but here's something to ponder. MS, IBM and HP all have labs too. And how effective they are is how well they can transfer ideas into development. HP had lots of idea, but consistently could not execute on them. IBM and MS do much better.

    You can have too many cooks, after all. For every thinker, there is a doer that is just as valuable, if not more so.

    Oh, and Google, now that you are public and MS wants a piece of your action, here's a hint. Arrogance and "we're better than..." can hurt you really, really bad. Just ask Netscape, err, AOL, err, well, you know. Don't get too cocky.

    I think of Richard Fenymann at times like this. Nobel Prize winner, who admired an illiterate MC in a local bar for his social skills and how he worked. True smarts is always being ready to learn, regardless of how or what is taught.

    Yea, maybe I'm jealous because I can't do those types of puzzles very well. But I still have enough brains to know that there is room for all types, and diversity wins over sheer brain power in the long haul.

    Of course, I'm not that brainy. Hell, I'm still posting here, for the love of... 8-)

    1. Re:Is this really recruiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are lots of types of intelligence.

  89. Don't Be Evil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is being elitist and treating your candidates like high school seniors "evil"? Are we applicants or supplicants?

    I dunno... I'm starting to dislike Google. It doesn't help that, given all the media coverage with the prerequisite goofy "rock star" pics, I think I've seen these two dudes (Sergey and Larry?) more than my own family...

  90. Re:Nice Troll! by RogL · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It may be a nice troll, but the fact is, Google's motto "Don't be evil" is in direct conflict with the fact that they just went public. A public corporation is mandated by law to make as much money as possible (i.e. accountable to the shareholders). Remember in Fight Club when he describes how the car company figures its recalls? They do it that way because its the law. Welcome to America...

    Factor in "customer goodwill", then "Don't be evil" becomes a long-term investment strategy. Screwing over your customers may turn a quick profit, but people / companies stop wanting to do business with you (if there's an alternative). In support of my position, I cite any discussion-page on Slashdot: look for anti-Microsoft sentiment.

  91. GLAT vs, Google Output by peter303 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    GLAT: Number of blank lines for testee's answer: 5.
    Number of "found pages" for typical google search: 523,984

  92. The Emotional Intellgence book? by andersan · · Score: 1

    Which book exactly are you referring to as "the Emotional Intellgence book"? I would like to read it, and knowing title and author would be a good start ;)

    1. Re:The Emotional Intellgence book? by ndykman · · Score: 1

      Sorry. No hyperlinks bad. The book is Emotional Intellegence by Daniel Goldman, ISBN: 0553375067. Amazon Link (I hope)

  93. Instead of math questions they should be asking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "How would stop the downward spiral in quality of Google's search results."

    I think they need fewer number crunchers and more creative thinkers.

  94. it seems that they are outsourcing by Nrlll9 · · Score: 1

    cuz these problems are the kind that appear in taiwanese high schools (and probably indian and chinese too)

  95. Judging intellect or skill by Presence1 · · Score: 1

    "Reading a person on paper (that they wrote) is not a very accurate means for judging a person's intellect or skills. Testing their abilities just to get to the application is a smart thing to do."

    Actually, reading things that a person wrote is a VERY accurate way of judging intellect and skills.

    When I manage hiring, I explicitly read EVERYTHING that comes in as a work product, not just for its content.

    In responding to the advert that specified a "cover letter and resume", did they send the cover letter? Does it say anything interesting? Do the cover letter and resume show good organization, clarity and execution (including grammar and spelling)? If so, they get to the next stage, which may a few essay Qs, which are again similarly evaluated.

    OTOH, "intelligence tests" are notoriously difficult to sort from bias and specific knowledge.

  96. For our German readers: by uradu · · Score: 1

    This guy didn't just join the cafeteria of his university, but a club for solving puzzles and finding friends and someone to love (though not necessarily in that order).

  97. Infinite Grid Resistance by Billy+Donahue · · Score: 1

    The *EXACT* resistance across a knight's move
    is actually:

    4/pi - 1/2

    I'd been working on this for a while before
    I got the GLAT in DDJ.

    The rec.puzzles FAQ is an OK starting point
    for getting this answer, but it has unclear
    English...

    http://rec-puzzles.org/sol.pl/physics/resistors

    Note to Google: thanks for the interesting
    puzzles, but it's degrading to make smart
    people do parlor tricks and jump through
    hoops for a job interview.

    So, I'm spilling the answer in the hopes
    of making the GLAT useless as a screening tool.

    --
    -- The Funk, The Whole Funk, And Nothing But The Funk
    1. Re:Infinite Grid Resistance by amorsen · · Score: 1

      On the rec.puzzles page they mention (but don't derive) an equivalent resistance for two nodes k diagonal nodes apart: (2/pi)(1+1/3+1/5+...+1/(2k-1)). It would seem that a knights move would be a 1-diagonal in series with an adjacent node. The former is simply 2/pi Ohm, the latter (as they show) is 1/2 Ohm. So my result is (2/pi + 1/2) Ohm. What am I doing wrong?

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    2. Re:Infinite Grid Resistance by Billy+Donahue · · Score: 1
      The derivation of the 2/pi resistance of
      cater-corner nodes is here:
      http://www.geocities.com/frooha/grid/node2.html
      (Caution: there are a few typographical errors in the math).

      You cannot simply add the 1/2 ohm to the cater-corner resistance.

      With due respect to the lameness filter,
      I present the diagram....
      . . K . K .
      .
      . K D A D K
      .
      . . A O A .
      .
      . K D A D K
      .
      . . K . K .
      Any node's equivalent resistance is the average of the equivalent resistances of its neighbors (by superposition: trust me on this).

      [ o/^ Go ask Laplace.... I think he'll know o/^ ... ]

      We know that A (adjacent) nodes have R = 1/2.
      We know that D (diagonal) nodes have R = 2/pi.
      We need to know resistance of K (knight) nodes.

      D is surrounded by 2 As and 2 Ks, Therefore 2A + 2K = 4D.

      K = 2D-A

      = 2*(2/pi) - (1/2)

      = 4/pi - 1/2

      So for a node which is a knight's move from the origin:
      R = 4/pi - 1/2
      --
      -- The Funk, The Whole Funk, And Nothing But The Funk
    3. Re:Infinite Grid Resistance by amorsen · · Score: 1

      Very neat. Thank you very much.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
  98. I Took The Test by $criptah · · Score: 1

    My buddy and I opened the magazine and found the test. We showed it to another friend of ours and then decided to take it collectively. After molesting our brains for about 30 minutes, we called it quits. We are not math wizzes, but all of us have good jobs (one does R&D for U.S. Navy, the other buddy and I do software stuff) and franky speaking, we would not want to work for an environment that treated us like high school kids.

    Believe it or not, once I was asked about my SAT score during an interview. I got an offer, but I dropped a ball on that one because I simply did not want to go back to school. I think Google's the same. The bottom line is "Look, not everybody has a Ph.D. in Math; however, there are plenty of smart and hardworking individuals who can benefit a company by strong team work and good attitudes." Notice, I am not saying "Hire everybody else or die!" I am simply stating that there are good and smart individuals who can be productive...

  99. Re:GLAT - sample questions (spoiler) by Billy+Donahue · · Score: 1

    It's actually the greatest number with the
    specified number of letters...

    This sequence is indexed by God as:
    http://www.research.att.com/cgi-bin/access.cgi/as/ njas/sequences/eisA.cgi?Anum=A052196
    (YES I googled it!)

    So, the answer is 96 or a Google depending on
    whether you want to count a Google as a
    bona-fide number.

    I tend to suspect the GoogleLabs would..

    --
    -- The Funk, The Whole Funk, And Nothing But The Funk
  100. For goodness sake. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Let them know!

    I hate people wasting my time and effort, and I let them know when they are doing so.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  101. Re:GLAT - sample questions (spoiler) by currivan · · Score: 1

    "Ten googol" (10^101) would be larger than "one googol" (10^100) with 9 letters, so they messed it up.

  102. Re:GLAT - sample questions (spoiler) by Billy+Donahue · · Score: 1


    Wow, you just blew my mind.
    I'd think the right answer is NINETYSIX, then.

    --
    -- The Funk, The Whole Funk, And Nothing But The Funk
  103. MOD -1 TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NT

  104. Do they still require resumes in WORD format? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    HR must not have been using Linux.

  105. 199981 also 131 on base 4 by crimsonhead · · Score: 1

    Since f(13) = 6 on base 4 too, and the base was not given, if we select 4 as the base then 131 = f(131). For the math dummies: 131 in base 4 is 30 in base 10 better known as the decimal system. Proving this as the smallest solution is farly easy (try it at home). One may think that 10 in binary is a valid answer, however f(13), google's own example, is undefined under binary.

    --


    (Score:5, Whoring)
  106. PhD != creativity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having a PhD and being creative are not mutually exclusive, but having a PhD is no guaranty of creativity. Lets face it. Creativity, or raw genius are hard to test for sight unseen. Good luck Google. And good luck to the rest of us. Companies wishing to only hire creative genius has the look of a growing trend.

    1. Re:PhD != creativity by dead+sun · · Score: 1
      No, but getting a PhD isn't exactly the easiest thing in the world to do either. Many PhD students survive through sheer determination and work, some are gifted, and I would guess that a few of them don't possess at least some positive trait but rough it out on somebody else's dollar. Thankfully those are typically easy to spot in their general attitude. At least they were during school.

      While Google may be missing out on somebody that is truly gifted that doesn't have a PhD, the chances of them finding somebody that knows how to solve challenging problems in one way or another likely increase by looking at PhDs, as opposed to them filtering through countless many applicants.

      I somehow doubt that Google would pass up somebody that's been in the field and proven themselves to have a knack for research because they don't have a doctorate as well. Proper references, publications, ideas and determination seem to be a good way to get an inside track at many places.

      As for companies wanting only creative genius, who can blame them? If the best and the brightest are lining up to interview with a company there must be something right happening there. It could be a real mess if the company didn't know how to manage PhDs or if they had nobody to do any grunt work. However, picking over whom is best for the job isn't exactly a bad thing. And if some of the people who got in under the tech bubble because of the money start disappearing because they can't code or think their way out of a paper bag, well, so be it.

      --
      If not now, when?
  107. Re:GLAT - sample questions (spoiler) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The answer is (c). Any real number occurs next in a sequence, none is "righter" than another.

  108. I don't want the added responsibility duh! by FatSean · · Score: 0

    If i'm being paid to pursue my interestes I need to produce. Many times I feel like doing something random, rather than restore the car or learn the language. I like my free time.

    Duh.

    --
    Blar.