Slashdot Mirror


40GB RCA Lyra: Apple Fans Needn't Fret

PaulEshoreLives writes "The Globe and Mail isn't taking too kindly to RCA's Lyra 40GB iPod 'competitor.' Amongst its gripes are a crazy-slow FFW. How slow? Like 6 minutes to get to the end of a 60 minute file. Gotta wonder how these things get missed at the beta stage."

314 comments

  1. ffw ? by mirko · · Score: 0

    What's a FFW ?

    And have these 6 minutes something to do with the 17-minute file copying troll ?

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
    1. Re:ffw ? by jrandall · · Score: 4, Informative

      I believe what is being referred to is a ridiculously slow "Fast Forward" function.

    2. Re:ffw ? by mirko · · Score: 1

      How often do you fast forward when you use an iPod ?
      BTW, besides Mike Oldfield Amarok, and a few Magma, Christian Vander or Offering songs, I do not have that much one hour long audio files.
      I guess the reviewer wanted to say something bad about these because he felt so good about his iPod.
      I understand this as I also am an happy iPod user but I do not have a problem with other's owning another potentially better player.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    3. Re:ffw ? by Rudeboy777 · · Score: 1

      I realize R'ing TFA is not in vogue, but if you did you would have seen that the reviewer uses his MP3 player for audio books.

      --

      From hell's heart I fstab at /dev/hdc

    4. Re:ffw ? by beakerMeep · · Score: 1, Funny

      I think the article submitter must have meant a crazy slow Full Figured Woman.

      --
      meep
    5. Re:ffw ? by Rich+Klein · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Apparently the original poster felt that his Full-Figured Woman should move faster. :-P

      I didn't see anything about 17-minute file copying in the article. What's that about?

      Aside from the author's pro-ipod bias, I only have one issue with the article:
      Tap the power button to turn it on. Unfortunately, it does not require you to hold the key to activate it and as such, it tends to get accidentally powered up in your pocket.

      With the original OS, my Archos Jukebox Recorder required me to hold down the On button for something like 5 seconds to turn it on, and I found that to be a real PITA. With the Rockbox OS I only have to hold it down for about 1/2 a second to power up the unit, and I've never had it turn itself on in my pocket (or anywhere). My point is: Don't make the user hold the button down for any length of time to avoid accidental power-ups; design and place the power button properly instead!
      --
      -Rich
    6. Re:ffw ? by geniusj · · Score: 1

      While you can fast forward on an iPod by holding down the next track button, the best way to span long distances is to press the center button and then scrub through the song/book with the scroll wheel. I'm guessing this player offers no such option, which is part of the problem.

      -JD-

    7. Re:ffw ? by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      I believe what is being referred to is a ridiculously slow "Fast Forward" function.

      Yeah, and the article comment:

      Gotta wonder how these things get missed at the beta stage.

      Made me chuckle. Its pretty much been established that at least in the electronic/computer/gadget field that beta testing has been outsourced to those willing to _pay_ to beta test products instead of companies paying to do it inhouse.

    8. Re:ffw ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There's an old /. troll that attacks an OS (usually Linux or OSX) on the basis that copying a file of some large size takes 17 minutes. It's usually pretty subtle and gets a lot of responses if used correctly.

    9. Re:ffw ? by ambient · · Score: 1

      Go look at an old tape deck... Might be hard to find one nowadays.

      The buttons usually used 3 letter shortforms for the actions: "rec" for record, "rew" for rewind and "ffw" for fast-forward. Oddly, play was always "play", I don't remember seeing "ply" or another shortform for it (other than the symbols).

    10. Re:ffw ? by DeadChobi · · Score: 1

      Or, like on my Rio Chiba, they could put a hold switch on the player so that even if you managed to get something pressing the power button for any length of time, it simply powers on the LCD for a few seconds to show a giant picture of a padlock, Mostly because padlocks are cool.

      --
      SRSLY.
  2. Why should Apple fans fret? by 3terrabyte · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I don't understand the tone of the post. Why would a better product coming out years later be a bad thing for Apple fans?

    Will it make your iPod quit working? Or make you love your iPod less?

    --

    Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

    1. Re:Why should Apple fans fret? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      **Why would a better product coming out years later be a bad thing for Apple fans?**

      you don't obviously understand apple fans and their level of commitment!

    2. Re:Why should Apple fans fret? by pertinax18 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I had this same question. Do Apple fans really have so much of their self-worth, emotional well-being and identity tied up in the Apple products they use that a competitor would make them concerned? Perhaps the Apple Corporation would fret, but unless I am really missing something this is hardly a concern for iPod users as it will only force Apple to innovate more and create a better product.

    3. Re:Why should Apple fans fret? by ExKoopaTroopa · · Score: 1, Funny

      This is a just an apple-lover's way of saying "My iPod is bigger than your portable music player"

      --
      Don't Tell Me What I Can't Do!
    4. Re:Why should Apple fans fret? by martingunnarsson · · Score: 1

      Mac fans don't want any competition for Apple. They want everybody to use macs, and tries to make all their friends buy Apple stuff. Believe me, I do :-)

      --
      Martin
    5. Re:Why should Apple fans fret? by gumpish · · Score: 1


      Will it make your iPod quit working?

      No, iPods do that on their own.

      As for your sig...

      Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

      In my case it's because their client is buggy. It would launch and quickly proceed to kill off the actual crunching engine. No worries, now that distributed.net is back to running useful projects (like OGR) I can use them.

    6. Re:Why should Apple fans fret? by t123 · · Score: 1

      Apple Fans Needn't Fret. That means they should not worry [about the lyra being a better product]

    7. Re:Why should Apple fans fret? by PriceIke · · Score: 1

      TRUE Apple fans don't "fret" about competition in the market because they--okay, we--know that Apple designs and produces the best. To an Apple fan, 98% of Apple's competition just proves that Apple is the best. The remaining 2% is what drives Apple to continue to innovate and develop even better products.

      Apple fans, being mostly fanatical zealots (myself included), will buy Apple products regardless of what else is available to them .. so we don't pay much attention to RCA or HP or Rio or Sony....

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    8. Re:Why should Apple fans fret? by mrtrumbe · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Because Apple is the only manufacturer in the world whose batteries eventually die, right? Or is it that, IN THE PAST, they didn't have a battery replacement program?

      IN THE PAST, they didn't have a way to fix the issue of a dead battery. That was bad. Bad Apple! But they fixed that problem. Now, they are just like every other manufacturer out there: your battery dies within the warranty period? You get it fixed for free. Your batter dies outside the warranty period, you pay to replace it (either through Apple, or through many of the "unofficial" sources available).

      Can we stop grousing about this issue now? Please?

      Taft

    9. Re:Why should Apple fans fret? by quisph · · Score: 1
      The headline says "Apple Fans Needn't Fret," not "iPod Users Needn't Fret." In other words, it's referring to fans not just of the products, but of the company. If something comes out that's better than the iPod, that would be bad for the company.

      It's kind of like fans of a sports team fretting about a rival team obtaining a star player. It doesn't make *their* team any worse, but obviously it affects their chances of success.

    10. Re:Why should Apple fans fret? by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It is an issue of feeling validated with your purchase. iPods are not cheap and for a person to shell out a week salary on a Portible MP3 Player takes some though for most people. So after they chose the iPod and they find the next week that XYZ company produced a better product or an equilvlant product at the same or less cost. Then the consumer feels like they have made a bad decision and have wasted their money. But as in the case of the iPod it has been popular for a couple of years now and so far there hasn't been a product that compleatly competes with it. So the customer feels good about their purchase and that they made a wize decision. This hold true in differnt areas that is why there are people who take joy when Crysler has a recall because they are a proud owner of a GM Car. If a product can over time make the customer feel good about buying it then there is a chance they will buy it again. But if there is something out there that was better and more afordable then they feel anonomsity towards that product, but mostly to themselfs for putting the money into it.

      This emotion is straight from childhood. Having to defend your toy with your friends. So if your friend has the latest plastic car with all the features. The child may often defend their Hot Wheels by the fact that the body is mostly metal and can't be broken as easily. Or the Kid with the Game Cube vs. the Kid with the PS2 They will argue back and forth saying whos is better.

      So now as an adult we see somones elses toys to be infearor to yours so it makes you happy like you just won an argument.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    11. Re:Why should Apple fans fret? by xchino · · Score: 1

      Becuase if it became the new hotness, 1000's of fanboys and fangirls would have "wasted" all that money on their mp3 player, and would have to go out and buy a new one so people will still think they are cool. I think about %5 of the ipod user base likes the ipod because of it's functionality, the other %95 use it as a status symbol, and will make any excuse to discount competitors as being subpar.

      I used to have an iPod, I liked it alot, and it served me well up until the point my brother dropped it out of a boat. I upgraded to a Rio Karma and I like it much better. It was cheaper and does the job just as well as the ipod. This is just my personal opinion, but at least it's an informed opinion.

      --
      Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.
    12. Re:Why should Apple fans fret? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up you apple faggot.

    13. Re:Why should Apple fans fret? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note that he said "Apple fans" -- not "iPod users." There is certainly a difference between someone who uses a company's product and someone who is as fanatically devoted to that company as a sports fan is to his/her team. I, for example, have an iPod, but I have no fanatical attachment to Apple.

      I can only hope that Timothy was aware of the difference when he posted the story.

    14. Re:Why should Apple fans fret? by dumbArtMajor · · Score: 1

      I think this hardly qualifies as a "better product", especially since color iPods came out yesterday.

      And even then, my 40GB iPod in LCD gray is still going to get the job done perfectly for the next couple years.

      Not all Apple users are hyper-emotional blind-consumer twits (not that you implied that, but other posters did).

    15. Re:Why should Apple fans fret? by pigeon · · Score: 1

      Obviously, I don't mind the competition making good or better products. What I do mind (but of course, everyone does that) is that companies bring out so called ipod killers, who don't live up to expectations. They are too big, too ugly, do not have a refined gui, do not intergrate that well with itunes, some of them do not work with a mac etc. And I find that more important than the ability to record, to play ogg, to play video or whatever.

    16. Re:Why should Apple fans fret? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey.. I own a Chrysler and if they had a recall for my car i would also rejoice because I'd be getting a free improvement to the safety of my car

    17. Re:Why should Apple fans fret? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't only straight from childhood; it is just Self-Justification. (Google for it.) Simply put, humans usually defend self-behaviour.

    18. Re:Why should Apple fans fret? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can we stop grousing about this issue now? Please?

      Well, yes and no.

      On one hand, extremists who like to complain about now nonexistent problems are wrong, e.g. there are now lots of places to get a new Apple battery. That's your point, and I agree with it.

      However, extremists who like to ignore real problems are also wrong. The iPod's battery still seems to die sooner than those in other mp3 players (because it's a regular Lithium-Ion battery rather than a Lithium-Polymer battery?) Also it's not as easy to replace by yourself as some others (which some people would rather do, e.g. because it's cheaper). Players like the Creative Zen Nomad or various Archos players have batteries which are designed to be removed, and all you need to open up a Dell DJ is an appropriately sized philips-head screwdriver. So anyone who's trying to ignore this real weakness of the iPod is also wrong.

      The site which "gumpish" linked to included the following text:

      We acknowledge Apple's new battery replacement policy. Our movie is a documentation of our experience.

      So I think they get the point about the existence of Apple's replacement program. On the other hand, that site also says:

      After the complicated installation, my ipod did not work at all, even when plugged in.

      This still seems like a valid complaint. Replacing an iPod battery is more likely to require a (more expensive) professional replacement than other players. Maybe it's just me, but I do still see an issue here.

      Maybe we can all agree on the following:

      1) Complaining about Apple's lack of a battery replacement policy is dumb because they have one now.
      2) Complaining about iPod batteries dying may be a valid complaint if you're talking about them dying faster than other mp3 jukeboxes.
      3) Complaining about how hard it is to replace iPod batteries yourself relative to other mp3 jukeboxes is a fair complaint.

    19. Re:Why should Apple fans fret? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you understand that this Lyra product is a stinking piece of shit?

    20. Re:Why should Apple fans fret? by psbrogna · · Score: 2, Informative
      I understand why you say this. After purchasing an Apple Quadra 840 for around $6k in the early 1990's, I felt violated when PC's of comparable performance where available at a fraction of the cost. I learned my lesson- I don't pay the premium for the Apple brand anymore. It just doesn't make sense. (xServe's withstanding- they're a solid value)


      However, I've gotten the impression that most Apple loyalists are immune to this phenomenon. They attribute the difference in price to the value of the superior engineering in Apple products. Huh. Yeah. More money for less mouse buttons is basically the situation. They must have put alot of effort into determining that it was in the users best interest to be denied those harmful context sensitive right click menus.

    21. Re:Why should Apple fans fret? by Smiffa2001 · · Score: 1
      "1) Complaining about Apple's lack of a battery replacement policy is dumb because they have one now."

      I do agree, but forgive me for thinking that $255 plus a handling fee for replacing a battery in a device such as an iPod smacks as more than a little expensive...
    22. Re:Why should Apple fans fret? by dj245 · · Score: 1
      Because Apple is the only manufacturer in the world whose batteries eventually die, right? Or is it that, IN THE PAST, they didn't have a battery replacement program?

      All rechargable batteries die eventually, depending on the amount of full/partial cycles you put it through and the amount the chemistry is good for. The problem with Apple (and some other MP3 players) is that the battery is terribly hard to get to and extremely difficult to replace by the average person. Even with other MP3 players with "proprietary" battery packs, you can oftentimes with NiMH just find similar-sized cells, make your own pack, shrink wrap it, and hook it up. Lithium is not that easy though.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    23. Re:Why should Apple fans fret? by tenton · · Score: 2, Informative

      $255 plus s/h? I hope you're talking non US $, because the replacement program is $99.95 plus $6.95 shipping (for a total cost of $105.95).

    24. Re:Why should Apple fans fret? by swimmar132 · · Score: 1

      Apple doesn't compete in the low end (except for the eMac and maybe the iBook), really. Powermacs are priced pretty comparably to a equivalent dual Xeon or what have you.

    25. Re:Why should Apple fans fret? by Smiffa2001 · · Score: 1

      Well, listening to the man from 'Apple' on the http://www.ipodsdirtysecret.com/[ipodsdirtysecret. com] says so... Maybe it's changed since then, or even better, Apple changed their policy.

    26. Re:Why should Apple fans fret? by mrtrumbe · · Score: 2, Interesting
      1) Complaining about Apple's lack of a battery replacement policy is dumb because they have one now.

      2) Complaining about iPod batteries dying may be a valid complaint if you're talking about them dying faster than other mp3 jukeboxes.

      3) Complaining about how hard it is to replace iPod batteries yourself relative to other mp3 jukeboxes is a fair complaint.

      Agreed. Very rational.

      I would like to see stats on the length of the iPod battery's life versus other players, though. I know that not all batteries are created equal, but they ARE commodity products, so I am a bit sceptical that Apple would be too far below the average in terms of quality.

      Taft

    27. Re:Why should Apple fans fret? by Flunitrazepam · · Score: 1

      A week's salary?

      what do you do for a living, wash dogs?

      --
      1) Your analysis is based on bad assumptions so your result is way off. 2) You're a sick bastard for fucking a horse.
    28. Re:Why should Apple fans fret? by WaltFrench · · Score: 1

      Howzabout "network" effects?

      As an iPod owner, I like the wide variety of accessories, choices in on-line music, etc. If the world moves massively to other formats, then Apple needs to retrofit my machine with WMA (or whatever) capability or I'll have less flexibility.

      I would certainly advise considering the whole ecosystem as part of anybody's decision to buy the Sony solution in this area.

      The prospective Sony owner faces a high risk of being stuck with limited music choices, no 3rd-party replacement parts (e.g., batteries) because of a limited market, artifacts in converting its ATRACS DRM'd music to another player's format when my machine dies & Sony is no longer interested in wasting its effort "competing" in this space, etc.

      Apple -- and for that matter, all the not-yet-at-critical-mass WMA solutions -- all have these isolation / orphanized risks. You can reduce these by only ripping your own music to your device, but the stores ARE great for some music.

      The risks now seem less for Apple than others -- so I won't "fret" -- but it's an issue to consider. Nothing to do with my manliness.

      --
      "Inquiring Minds Want to Know!"
    29. Re:Why should Apple fans fret? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Cupertino Uber Alles!

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    30. Re:Why should Apple fans fret? by nategasser · · Score: 1

      Apple Fan != iPod owner.

      If all you do is own an iPod, you're right, more competition is good, better products, etc.

      But if (for reasons outside the scope of this argument) you are a fan of Apple Computer, then bad news for them would cause you to fret.

      Sensible enough, isn't it?

    31. Re:Why should Apple fans fret? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should've been on the Ford Pinto litigation team. Good work.

  3. Hey, not all codecs .. by torpor · · Score: 3, Informative

    .. are conducive to rapid-scan indexing of frames.

    Sure, on an uncompressed mpeg4, you can just fseek() where you need to go and pick right up, but some codecs (not gonna mention names) are designed with limitations that make faster-than-1x speed indexes exceedingly difficult for simple lower-power processors ..

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    1. Re:Hey, not all codecs .. by tomstdenis · · Score: 3, Interesting

      mp3 falls into that category. On a CBR file you can roughly just fseek to bitrate*seconds into the file and be approximately where you want to be.

      Valid mp3 decoders must allow "garbage" data before a header. So

      cat somerandomtxtfile.txt mysong.mp3 > new.mp3

      new.mp3 is now a valid mp3 file/stream.

      Chances are the testers aren't actually users which is why they didn't find a really slow FFW "a problem".

      Though really cumbersome MP3 players are pretty much the norm. Mine [from Samsung of all companies...] doesn't sort the files so even though my tracks are numbered they never play in any particular order [and no this is with shuffle turned off]. It also "plays" as you seek which is annoying [so it's even slower than 6min/60min as this player has].

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:Hey, not all codecs .. by CKW · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Doesn't mp3 allow you to just "start somewhere" and begin playing? It's a streaming media protocol... They don't need to *process* 60 minutes of mp3, they just need to stop processing the mp3 while you're holding down the Fast ForWard (FFW) button, AND do a slow rise in the rate that the "time counter" is increasing....

      My Lyra 64 MB SD mp3 player also has this problem, it only fast forwards at a fixed rate of about 10:1, which is entirely unacceptable for a "whole albumn" mp3. For "large files" they need to rise to 50:1 after 5 seconds, and 200:1 after another 10 seconds. Maybe leave it at 10:1 and 30:1 for files less than 10 minutes... heck scale the rise in rate with the size in file...

      And my Lyra isn't processing the file either like this reviewed device is, I don't hear any clipped chatter.

    3. Re:Hey, not all codecs .. by doofusclam · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Sure, on an uncompressed mpeg4, you can just fseek() where you need to go and pick right up


      What are you on about? What is an 'uncompressed' mpeg4 file? The real issue is the bitrate, is it variable or fixed per frame? Most decent codecs are the latter and you need to build an offset list to handle ffw correctly. Rewind is even harder that ffw, especially with b-frames.
    4. Re:Hey, not all codecs .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MP3 should have no problem with this; its about as simple as it gets.

    5. Re:Hey, not all codecs .. by delus10n0 · · Score: 1

      If it's CBR, yes, it's easier to just just to a jump to a certain time. But, if it's VBR, there should be a "XING" VBR header to give the codec some idea of where that time frame is. The codec jumps to that point, and then starts seeking frames to find that exact timecode. That can take up a little more time/processing power than CBR would.

      http://gabriel.mp3-tech.org/mp3infotag.html

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
    6. Re:Hey, not all codecs .. by torpor · · Score: 1


      MPG4 is just a container format, the frames in that container can be 'compressed' with different codecs.. though you can have a 'raw-data mpeg4' file containing individual bitbuffers full of video, most mpeg4's depend on a codec to reduce the file size.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    7. Re:Hey, not all codecs .. by delus10n0 · · Score: 1

      A lot of MP3 decoders only allow so much garbage in the header (usually 16k, I believe?) before they just give up and declare the file not playable.

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
    8. Re:Hey, not all codecs .. by Otter · · Score: 1

      I think this is less of a technical issue than a UI decision. Hitting fast-forward has to do *something*, and making it too fast or too slow would both be problems. The issue here is that they seem to have chosen a poor scheme.

    9. Re:Hey, not all codecs .. by doofusclam · · Score: 1

      Fair point, though i've never personally seen an uncompressed mpeg4 file.

      The reference to b-frames also applies only to video, not audio which is the case here, but it's still a valid point.

    10. Re:Hey, not all codecs .. by tuffy · · Score: 1
      mp3s don't even *have* a header. A lot of them have special first frames that contain a seektable, or maybe an ID3v2 tag, but that's about it. If the file has a seektable you've got a good chance to hopping anywhere inside it. But if you've got a VBR mp3 without one, you're in for a lot of hurt.

      The whole mp3 format is a big kludge. I'm often amazed that it works at all.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    11. Re:Hey, not all codecs .. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      MP3 allows playing from the beginning of any frame - you know, like just about any kind of MPEG data.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:Hey, not all codecs .. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      poor scheme? 60 mins .. 6 mins.

      so it's 10x speed.

      probably not that far off from ff on an usual cdplayer.

      (of course, they should have made it accelerating..)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    13. Re:Hey, not all codecs .. by Jardine · · Score: 1

      My Lyra 64 MB SD mp3 player also has this problem, it only fast forwards at a fixed rate of about 10:1, which is entirely unacceptable for a "whole albumn" mp3.

      The other thing I've noticed with this player is the buttons take a bit of effort to hold down. It's also very easy to take enough pressure off to stop it fast forwarding but then put just a bit of pressure back on it to make it skip to the next track. Very annoying when trying to get to say the 30 minute mark of a 60 minute mp3.

      Still pretty good for the price. Got mine for $70 CDN at Futureshop. The headphones that come with it suck but I have a different pair I use anyway.

    14. Re:Hey, not all codecs .. by CKW · · Score: 1

      .
      YES, I've noticed those same things. One other thing I've noticed is that if you put the player in it's armband thingie - you can no longer press the buttons, it's buried under too many layers of heavy material. They should re-arrange where the velcro is and make thinner material where the buttons are. Maybe even put on "fake button" targets.

      I can press any of the buttons reliably through my jeans, shell jacket, and my fall jacket. Probably something to do with the two middle buttons being smaller yet taller than the two outer buttons, thus quickly recognizable.

      The "bit of pressure" thing is probably good in terms of preventing accidental presses, but it is noticable when ffwding. Luckily I rarely ffwd. I'll probably hunt down some kind of software to make it easy to chop up the large "full cd" mp3's I have. I don't have many of those either, so it doesn't bother me much at all.

      Yes, those headphones suck, I can't stand that type (around the ear big-things). I love a *good* pair of earbuds, ones that are $15-$25 (lately certain Sony's).

      One bad thing with earbuds is that it's hard to run with them, they tend to "pop out". I usually buy extra sets of the little foamies (can be found at any dollar store) and put a 2nd set of them on to make them a "tigher fit". I've also found that earbuds that don't come with foamies fit nicer if I put foamies on them.

      Would you believe that the best pair of earbuds I've *ever* found were a pair I bought in 1991, KOSS, $15 Canadian Tire. After something like 7 years of use, the wires finally parted and I had to go HUNTING *so-hard* to find anything even comparable. Took me ages to find something acceptable in comparison.

      Of course I wouldn't touch *anything* KOSS these days. Ruining their reputation selling the cheap-ass $4 super-huge non-neodymium earbuds all over the place...

      LOVE the fact that SD memory is so cheap. Would love to find out if this player is compatible with a 512 MB SD card... I've gotta get around to upgrading the firmware and/or asking on a newsgroup/forum.

  4. Wow ! by Digital+Warfare · · Score: 1, Funny

    Might sell my iPod for one of these. Infact, I might start using Windows as well..

    --
    "Sweet llamas of the Bahamas !"
    1. Re:Wow ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Might sell my iPod for one of these. Infact, I might start using Windows as well.

      Yeah, who needs a sleek, functionnal player when you can have a huge bulky player?

      And as for switching to Windows... Dude, you don't know how many viruses and trojans you're missing! We're having fun on this side! Join the party and add your box to the army of zombies! We're trying to slashdot the intharweb!

  5. iPod Competitor by Ionizer7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why does every new hard disk mp3 player have to be labeled an iPod competitor? Some of these devices aren't even close to the iPod.

    1. Re:iPod Competitor by Bricklets · · Score: 1

      Why does every new hard disk mp3 player have to be labeled an iPod competitor? Some of these devices aren't even close to the iPod.

      Umm, because they compete with the iPod? That was easy. Next! :-)

      I think a more appropriate question is why are so many MP3 players labeled an iPod killer. My personal opinion is because Apple is doing too good a job moving iPods off the shelf. This is the same company that "ruined" their computer business, right? They haven't learned from their past mistakes, right? They only make cute little toys that are neato but have no mass consumer appeal, right?

      Wrong. Oops. But that's not stopping "industry analysts" from seconding guess Apple anyway.

      --
      Little Bricklets
    2. Re:iPod Competitor by parvenu74 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All the new hard drive mp3 player are called iPod competitors because Apple's iPod owns about 92% of that particular market. Ergo, they are the de facto incumbent against which all new entries will be compared and against which all new players must compete in order to make any sales.

      (For my part, I am still trying to decide between the iRiver H140 or the 40GB iPod for my Christmas gift to me...)

    3. Re:iPod Competitor by Ionizer7 · · Score: 1

      My point is, there is lots of competition out there in the electronic market, but you dont see everything labeled a competitor.

    4. Re:iPod Competitor by buro9 · · Score: 1

      The same reason that every other OS aside from Windows is a Windows competitor... Apple holds the majority of the portable HDD audio market, if anyone else wants to gain significant market share then it's Apple that they need to beat.

      It's no point making a device like this (incurring all of the R&D costs... though not it appears in this case) and then only wanting to take out a 2% market share holder.

    5. Re:iPod Competitor by PriceIke · · Score: 1

      I think the point is that RCA wants their product to be an iPod killer. So does every other manufacturer with a competing product. It's like when Adobe kept coming out with new versions of PageMaker in their attempt to make a "Quark killer." That's how I read it, anyway ..

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    6. Re:iPod Competitor by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      Why does every new hard disk mp3 player have to be labeled an iPod competitor? Some of these devices aren't even close to the iPod.


      Market share and psychology.

      For the same reason that people say that Linux can almost compete with Windows for the desktop. Gotta compare yourself to the leader so people know what you're talking about.

      And, in extremely broad strokes, how can you not compare a portable HDD based MP3 player against the iPod?? It boils down to:

      • Does it hold more or less than the iPod?
      • Does it operate easier or harder than an iPod?
      • Does it cost more or less than an iPod?


      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    7. Re:iPod Competitor by penginkun · · Score: 1

      In point of fact, NONE of them is even remotely close to the iPod. They suffer from the typical non-Apple feature creep...they think having more things to tweak and settings to fiddle with are more important that easy to use software and a simple, streamlined UI. Apple did it right and now they own the market. Their products are not appreciably more expensive than their competitors', not in light of their vastly superior usability.

      Let someone produce a music player as simple and elegant and easy to use as the iPod, and Apple may have some actual competition. Until then, neither Apple nor their customers has any reason to fret.

  6. OK, this just isnt fair.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am submitting an article on the Archos Gmini 400. This has gone too far. 'oooh the ipod can view photos!' jesus christ.

    1. Re:OK, this just isnt fair.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Archos is not compatible with industry-standard AAC files, does not synchronize with iTunes, and provides an inferior user experience.

      Don't worry. iPod users needn't fret about the Archos Gmini 400.

  7. Lyra: the * MPY * player. (not MP3) by denis-The-menace · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have a Lie-ra too. The 128MB version. It claims to play MP3s but you must convert them to MPY format using a MusicMatch plugin!! (BTW: it plays WMA files too but without a conversion to MPY )
    I wonder if this Lyra play MP3s or MPYs?

    --
    Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    1. Re:Lyra: the * MPY * player. (not MP3) by YetAnotherName · · Score: 1

      OK, for those of us who live in virtual caves (self included), an MPY format file seems to be nothing more than a secure version of an MP3 format file that plays only in RCA/Lyra players.

      More info.

    2. Re:Lyra: the * MPY * player. (not MP3) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? I have the 128 and I drag and drop mp3's to it with out using their junky software or converting. You should check their website for a firmware update or something.

    3. Re:Lyra: the * MPY * player. (not MP3) by crownrai · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have the 64MB RCA Lyra. Same as the 128MB except for the obvious gimpyness of less storage space.

      It can play MP3, WMA(plain or DRM), and MP3pro. I haven't use WMA's on it much but for MP3 or MP3pro playback you just hook it up to your machine and copy the files using your OS' filemanger. No extra software required. Havent even heard of this MPY format you speak of.

      It does come with music manager software but that still on the CD. Perhaps it stores music on the device in this MPY format.

      Nice feature about this player is the SD card slot. I'll be getting a 1GB when the SD cards drop even more then they have already.

    4. Re:Lyra: the * MPY * player. (not MP3) by bonqers · · Score: 2, Insightful

      RCA/Thompson has a firmware update that gets rid of the necessity to encrypt mp3s thru MusicMatch. It works great. My Lyra looks and acts just like a portable usb drive to windows now, and I don't have to use MusicMatch either. Check out Yahoo Groups RCA-Lyra-MP3, or go to www.rca.com/digitalaudiosupport

    5. Re:Lyra: the * MPY * player. (not MP3) by Anti+Frozt · · Score: 1

      Than you must just be unfortunate. I have the exact same player (RD1071A is the model number IIRC, so maybe you have an older model), but I can play normal MP3 files without problem. Have you checked into upgrading the firmware? There may be a fix for older models (if there are any).

      --
      In C++, friends can touch each others private parts.
    6. Re:Lyra: the * MPY * player. (not MP3) by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Informative

      I know this is /. and nobody ever reads the fucking article, so here's your answer. Obviously some other idiots didn't RTFA either since they modded you up. I'll probably get modded down for reading the article; that's just how it works.

      The Lyra plays MP3 files from 32 Kbps to 320 Kbps, MP3PRO files from 48 Kbps to 96 Kbps, and Windows Media files (including Windows Media 9 DRM) from 32 Kbps to 192 Kbps. iTunes is not supported.

    7. Re:Lyra: the * MPY * player. (not MP3) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not so sure RTFM applies here. When I bought a LYRA mp3 player, it said just that, "personal mp3 player." The concept appearantly being that if you could feed it mp3s through the MusicMatch interface to convert them, it's an mp3 player.

      Firmware upgrade made no difference - if I copy mp3s straight to it as a drive the player still sees nothing. As an added bonus, the included MusicMatch software demands an upgrade every time you open it (disables cddb for one thing if you don't). If you do upgrade, you can no longer see your LYRA (recognized as a Thomson 1100 or similar).

      Having a dedicate os partition just for my mp3 player is a real treat.

    8. Re:Lyra: the * MPY * player. (not MP3) by rikkards · · Score: 1

      It does come with music manager software but that still on the CD. Perhaps it stores music on the device in this MPY format.

      Exactly. They created a plugin that converted the MP3 to MPY but the only application that supported it was Music Manager. Which I absolutely hate. I was happy as a pig in sh!t when the belt clip broke and took the mp3 player with it when it hit the ground. I ended up buying a Rio Cali and love it.

      For me there is no interest in getting an iPod. They are pretty looking and have a whizbang interface but I only use my mp3 player for running and find them too heavy. Plus I have about 260M on my Rio Cali and have about 30M free. There is only certain songs I can run to and I have not found enough to fill it yet. I maybe add and remove songs maybe once a month so the copying up doesn't bother me.
      One of the things the Lyra annoyed me with was that if I had an SD card in, I could only see the SD Card content. With the Cali I get two drives one for internal and one for SD.

      The whole MPY thing was the most annoying thing. I would only use MusicManager when I needed to convert songs to MPY and then I would copy them back onto my computer.

    9. Re:Lyra: the * MPY * player. (not MP3) by Felipe+Hoffa · · Score: 1

      MP.. why?

      Fh

    10. Re:Lyra: the * MPY * player. (not MP3) by Jardine · · Score: 1

      The Lyra plays MP3 files from 32 Kbps to 320 Kbps

      I'm not sure why they specify that lower limit. The WBAI radio show Off the Hook is encoded at 16kbps and it plays just fine for me.

  8. As Heather Duke would say... by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

    "Just another case of a geek trying to imitate the popular people and failing miserably."

  9. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Why would I fret? I already own an iPod. It's not like the existence of a superior product to the iPod (which may already exist in some ways) will suddenly make my iPod disappear.

    I'll check out the market in a year or two when my iPod is getting old and clunky and I feel like getting a new gadget. Until then, I'm not really thinking about mp3 players honestly...

  10. Not the beta stage by TheOste · · Score: 2, Funny

    In the software development world that would be the alpha stage. I can just see it now.

    Engineer to Management.

    We are trying to work on the fast forward function and we would like to do that before shipping.

    Management to Engineer.

    We must ship by this date, we don't care if the software is done correctly or not, just get us revenue.

    Engineer to Management.

    Ok, me must remove the FFW button from the machine.

    Management.

    No, leave it we have a great idea.

    Management to end user and press.

    "This is a new feature of the ffw button, we think that it should be a super slow function, for those times when you just have a little too much time on your hands."

    Happens all the time

  11. Again? Look, can we just take it as read by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

    That every portable hard disk based music player is inferior to an iPod until we hear otherwise? We get the message.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  12. Re:Consumericanism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Dear sir,
    Your views intrigue me and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

  13. So? by iainl · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So the forward-scan button gives you a 10x speed ffw. And? Why is this bad?

    But then, I'm not getting my head round having single mp3 files that are 60 minutes long either, so that might explain it. I mean, there's Eno's Neroli, but I can't think of any others off the top of my head.

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    1. Re:So? by savagedome · · Score: 1

      Complete Albums as single mp3 files. I use them a lot. Make a playlist of all albums and set them on shuffle. So you get to listen a complete album from start to end and also keep the 'guessing' mode which I like.

    2. Re:So? by Koyaanisqatsi · · Score: 1

      the article specificaly mentioned audiobooks and the lack of a decent "bookmark" function, so the concern is very valid indeed.

    3. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Green Carnation, a Norwegian progressive rock band, released an album called "Light of Day, Day Of Darkness" which featured a song that lasted for 60 minutes exactly.

    4. Re:So? by Alranor · · Score: 1

      Dance Music.

      I've got several live sets which are 3 or 4 hours long single mp3s , and it's tricky to split them into single tracks because they're all mixed together.

    5. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I've been listening to a lot of 1/2 and 1 hour MP3s recently: DJ mixes recorded off the radio (Radio 1 Breezeblock sessions, to be specific). The MP3 player I use on my Nokia 6600 also has issues with FFWD.

      [Happosai]

    6. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      erm, I have tons of mixes that can be anyware from an hour to 2 hours long. 2 hours of bangin' dance can quite easily pass away a long afternoon in front of the terminal....

    7. Re:So? by iainl · · Score: 1

      That's one of the things I really, really hate about the iPod and co. I've got several mix discs myself, split into tracks but designed to be played gapless.

      Piece of cake on CD, utterly impossible on practically every mp3 player. Stupid, really. I can't stand the kludge of turning it into one giant mp3 and just 'remembering' where the track indexes are.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    8. Re:So? by timftbf · · Score: 1

      iPod (and iTunes) has "shuffle by album". It picks a random album, plays all the tracks in order, then picks another random album. Rinse and repeat. I've only recently discovered it, and it makes a rather nice change from completely random and often rather mis-matched track selections.

      I can't see how *not* being able to get to a specific track when you wanted to without using FF/RW wouldn't be exceedingly annoying. That's one reason we ditched cassettes, no?

      Regards,
      Tim.

    9. Re:So? by kidlinux · · Score: 1

      How about live shows. Or DJ mixing sessions. Anything from BBC's essential mix - Daft Punk's '97 session takes a full two CDs. Essential selections are about an hour long too.

      I've got heaps of stuff over an hour long.

      Or what about one of the radio shows you record with the RCA device itself?

      --
      -kidlinux.
  14. Slower than a cassette player? by suso · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most cassette players and VCRs can go from start to end of a tape in about 1-2 minutes. That's sad.

    1. Re:Slower than a cassette player? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      There's an easy fix to the fast-forward complaint.

      To change the FFW speed of a hard-disk based MP3 player, all that's needed is a firmware upgrade to tell the MP3 decoder to skip a greater number of frames. RCA's engineers could have one available for download tomorrow, and if they're smart they will.

    2. Re:Slower than a cassette player? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use my mp3 player to listen to music, not fast forward it!

    3. Re:Slower than a cassette player? by suso · · Score: 1

      Haha, that's funny.

      You should watch Mulholland Drive on DVD. ;-)

    4. Re:Slower than a cassette player? by chochos · · Score: 1

      I spent a couple of minutes figuring out what you were trying to say. Then I remembered someone told me that Region 1 edition of Mulholland Drive has no chapters and does not allow you to fast-forward or rewind through the movie (or maybe it does but it's one loooong chapter). The region 4 edition has chapters and allows you to fast-forward or rewind normally...

  15. iPodian by LegendOfLink · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It always strikes me as strange why a company would believe that simply jumping on the MP3 Player bandwagon, and not actually producing a superior product to the iPod, would yield better sales results than the iPod. Absolute insanity.

    1. Re:iPodian by stoborrobots · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ... yield better sales results than the iPod.

      Maybe that's *GASP* not the aim? as long as I make positive profit, I don't really care if I make more sales than the iPod.

      Insanity is not taking advantage of a clean, healthy profit which requires minimal marketing because that's all been done by your competitors...

    2. Re:iPodian by distributed · · Score: 1

      maybe if you have heard/know of how the windows OS began its life... this wouldnt be too much of a surprise. ;)

      --
      [all generalizations are untrue except this one]
    3. Re:iPodian by jxyama · · Score: 2, Insightful
      i'd say it's pretty darn hard to have a "healthy" profit when your device has a smaller profit margin (components are just about the same for all HD mp3 players... but iPods are priced higher) and the bulk of the consumers is dying to get your competitors product that's already dominating the market.

      IMHO, there are roughly two kinds of people buying off-iPod HD mp3 players: 1) "geeks" who value raw specs above all else and getting "money's worth" in that regard and 2) "parents" who's been asked to get an "iPod" but thought it wasn't so important to actually get an "iPod"

    4. Re:iPodian by stoborrobots · · Score: 1

      Yes, the electronics costs about the same, but you have the advantage of not having to create the market - Apple is already doing that. You also don't have to do as much R&D, because the interface, and tools are already out there...

      So you can make a profit, despite lower sales prices than Apple... And you're happy with your 1% of a multi-million dollar market - let Apple take 90%, you're still making enough ROI to make having only two customer-sets worthwhile...

      There's more to this business than being #1...

  16. FFWing a 60 minute file by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Going through a 60 minute file in 6 minutes is still a fast forward. Fast is just a very ambibious term.

    I don't think that every slashdot topic with the words "iPod" in it deserve to be on the front page.

    I also wouldn't call every single device that plays MP3s an iPod competitor. The next thing you know you'll be throwing up newsposts about IBM laptops not having a scroll wheel.

    1. Re:FFWing a 60 minute file by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      It's a hard disk based mp3 player with the same price as an iPod at the same capacity. If that's not a competitor, WHAT IS?

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
  17. Erm? by grasshoppa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Gotta wonder how these things get missed at the beta stage."

    PHB: Beta stage? What beta stage?

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:Erm? by jimicus · · Score: 1

      PHB: What's a beta stage?

  18. Ebooks by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have a few that are MUCH longer then an hour..

    And are not split up by chapter... so its one huge file..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Ebooks by iainl · · Score: 1

      Aaah, I see. Every eBook I've ever seen came broken down into couple-of-minute chapters, so this never occurred to me. How do you remember your place?

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    2. Re:Ebooks by MattWeth · · Score: 1

      jeez - did you read the review article at all??
      You remember your place by placing a bookmark (a feature which is very poorly implemented on the unit in question).

  19. I love that headline by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Apple Fans Needn't Fret

    What is that saying about a group of people, that a competitor's product to Apple might cause you to "fret"? I guess its implying that Apple users don't like competition? But beyond that, why should competition cause anyone outside of Apple cause any stress for anyone that doesn't make a living selling Apple realted products? Its just wierd thats all. I understand that we can all get caught up in fandom every now and then, but geez louise give it a break.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    1. Re:I love that headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is that saying about a group of people that a competitor's product to Linux might cause you to "fret"? I guess it's implying that Linux users don't like competition? But beyond that, why should competition cause anyone outside of Linux cause any stress for anyone that doesn't make a living selling Linux related products? Its just weird that's all. I understand that we can all get caught up in fandom every now and then, but geez louise give it a break.

      (note: I simply replaced "Apple" with "Linux", and fixed typos)

    2. Re:I love that headline by greed · · Score: 1
      I don't know any Apple fans that fret about other companies' activities.

      All the fretting seems to come from non-Apple fans thinking about what Apple fans should be thinking about.

      Most of us Apple fans kind of like being off in a little corner where no-one wants to bother us, except occasionally tell us that we'd be better if we just downloaded a copy of Windows XP like everyone else.

      The popularity of the iPod is thus very confusing and disturbing....

      Heck, next thing you know, they'll have Windows support on the iPod, and then where will it all end?

  20. Re:Consumericanism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Gee, you'd think someone with views as meticulously thought out as yours would realize that the Globe & Mail is a Toronto paper. Perhaps you have a similar screed about consumenadians, eh?

  21. Reasons to fear by worksucks371 · · Score: 3, Interesting


    I believe "apple fans" have a reason to fear iRiver and the Nomad Zen more then this.
    since IMNSHO both of these give you far better bang for your buck, not to mention the iRiver has more features.

    Just my two cents really.

    1. Re:Reasons to fear by Elithris · · Score: 1

      I agree, the iRiver has many more features than the iPod and IMHO looks better. On top of that, it's in the same price range if not cheaper. The Rio Karma has more options and is $100 less. The only reason the iRiver HD player isn't an iPod killer is, of course, because the iPod has brand recognition.

    2. Re:Reasons to fear by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      The Nomad Zen is quite a bit larger than iPod, IIRC about 50% on volume, so it is a lot easier to make them cheaper. The iRiver H120 has an odd protruding nipple contraption as a control, and costs just as much as iPod. The PMP-120 is pretty nice looking and possibly worth consideration, but I haven't found a whole lot of useful reviews for it yet.

    3. Re:Reasons to fear by nativespeaker · · Score: 0

      The iRiver is also bulkier and has a less intuitive interface. The iPod has brand recognition for a reason.

    4. Re:Reasons to fear by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 1

      Well for me, it -is- nice to be able to record on the iRiver, even though its interface isn't as nice as the iPod.

      There's just so much zealotry all around, it's just another form of the old dick-measuring contest.

      Apple fans^H^H^H^Hzealots, are a little smug for my liking, but hey, I guess my FOSS zealotry probably gets old for them too...

      --
      A house divided against itself cannot stand.
    5. Re:Reasons to fear by Chris_Rank · · Score: 1

      Reason to fear iRiver? Please, while the iRiver is geek friendly, mere mortals that have them (one sorotity chick I know comes to mind) hate them. This particular girl got one as a gift from her geek boyfriend instead of an iPod which is what she wanted. Not only does she not use it, she actually actively dislikes it. To some too many "features" means confusing. The beauty of the iPod is its consumer (lowest common denominator) friendly human interface. This is what any competitor has yet to beat.

    6. Re:Reasons to fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, I like the iRiver's "news" page.

      I just see their marketing team: "What's the best way to sell these? Get them in pictures with as much cleavage as possible!"

    7. Re:Reasons to fear by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Well the iRiver H series is advertised as being for geeks on their website.

      I agree that the interface isn't all that great, it could have done with a couple extra buttons for example on my h320. But when I shopped for a music player, I looked at the iPod and at the iRiver H320 and IMO there really wasn't any competition between the two. Of course users who want a simple apliance may see things differently.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    8. Re:Reasons to fear by DMJC-L · · Score: 1

      hahaha common to lowest denominator interface.. that's great, now back to the "Real World" Tm, ipod's wheel as simple as it is to use...sucks it takes 5 mins to learn to use an ipod, and 15 mins to learn to use an iriver, the difference is tho, that extra 15 mins makes a HUGE difference in what you can do with the device as opposed to the ipod where given 2000 years you still can't do more with it than you can in the first 5 mins.

    9. Re:Reasons to fear by Chris_Rank · · Score: 1

      Thats not the point. I am not talking about which one is BETTER, just which one will be more successful. Let's face it, Apple is not targeting unix sysadmins with the iPod! They are targeting consumers. Consumers are sheep. (Which explains M$ dominance in the OS market) Please read the comment next time. Am I saying the iPod is BETTER? Nope, my point is that the competiton has a long way to go to make a simplier, more elegant product. The iPod will always dominate as long as they have the easiest to use and stylish player. Technology is a very low factor in the over buying decison for most consumers.

  22. Re:Consumericanism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps you have a similar screed about consumenadians, eh?

    That's a type of soup, right?

  23. seek to support ? by distributed · · Score: 1

    Does the Lyra support the seek to xx:xx time function ?
    Otherwise high speed ffw is not a very frequently used function... in winamp eg. i would directly click at the approx position from where i would like the play to continue instead of ffwding.
    but as someone has already posted it depends on the codec also.

    vik

    --
    [all generalizations are untrue except this one]
  24. whats up with all this fear crap? by Captain+BooBoo · · Score: 1

    I really wonder sometimes why people make statements like this. I just got my free ipod from the freeipods.com deal and I love it. I am not fearfull of some other mp3 player any more that I am fearfull of of tin foil hats.

  25. Re:Again? Look, can we just take it as read by thisfred · · Score: 3, Informative

    In that case: have a look at the Rio Karma. 1. It's cheaper 2. It plays Ogg 3. It has a better screen resolution 4. It has cross platform support (a java client that uses an ethernet connection to download/upload music from/to it)

    --
    "I Just Want You To Hurt Like I Do" - Randy Newman
  26. Slow Fast-forward? by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a big minus for fans of Spock's Beard, Yes, Klaus Schultze, Brian Eno... and the many other artists who have escaped the bounds of single-digit minute compositions.

    If I could have mass storage on my PocketPC it would be the best music player out there... because it uses a Windows CE port of WinAmp (still beta unfortunately)... what could be easier to use? For now, I have to settle with a 1GB SD card, but that's not bad... and I can play games or read while I listen.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    1. Re:Slow Fast-forward? by slungsolow · · Score: 1

      if you are a fan of the music, why would you want to fast forward? Wouldn't you want to rewind instead?

      It seems to me that people are just trying to find area's to critize these devices so they can be compared to the iPod.

    2. Re:Slow Fast-forward? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      You can break the same song into multiple tracks with no gaps between them. It's done on CD all the time (ie; pretty much every live recording album ever made).

      Buy an iPod

      Buy an iPod

      Buy an iPod

      Buy an iPod
      Buy an iPod

      Buy an iPod
      Buy an iPod

      Buy an iPod

      and a mac

      weoooooooo Apple

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:Slow Fast-forward? by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I rarely use either. Mostly I skip back a track to play something again.

      99% percent of the time, I just listen to something through.

      I'm just making a joke... I have my music player and am not in the market to play the price of a full computer for another.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    4. Re:Slow Fast-forward? by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      iTunes could be easier to use than WinAmp?

      I mean, that's the iPod interface... iTunes. You have your artists, albums, genres, library, and playlists. You've got your song ratings, playcount, and per song EQ. You've got audio books and calendars and notes and contact lists. You also get photos and album art if you get the color iPod.

      That's what you get with the iPod, at least :)

    5. Re:Slow Fast-forward? by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Well, the per-song EQ sounds nice, but all the rest is just noise. I haven't looked at iTunes in a while, but they didn't even have the more popular groups I listen to. Besides, I still want to be able to buy a CD and rip it. Paying for bits doesn't feel like I own anything (of course I realize I don't either way).

      Besides a PDA can do all those other things just fine, and I didn't pay the Apple tax.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  27. Beta? by nabil · · Score: 0, Redundant

    They had a Beta stage?

  28. Zealots, zealots zealots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux fans don't want any competition for Linux. They want everybody to use Linux, and tries to make all their friends use Linux.
    Believe me, I do :-)

  29. Err, perhaps because... by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    ... with a CD or even a vinyl LP you can skip to wherever you want in seconds or less. This player is supposed to be the next generation of music machines and yet it appears to be a lot more awkward to use in some ways than the technology its supposed to supercede! For me thats hardly a selling point.

    1. Re:Err, perhaps because... by iainl · · Score: 1

      How do you get where you want in seconds on a CD? By using the track skip function.

      What is broken on the box is having to do the kludge mentioned by several here of turning all your tracks into one giant mp3, not the fact that movement within a track is 'only' 10x speed (about the same as my CD player's ffwd function, by the way).

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  30. 4 dimensional by pwells · · Score: 5, Funny

    According to the article (sorry):
    The 154 gram unit comes in at 8.5-by-13.8-by-7.2 centimetres and 2.5cm thick

    Should we fret about the 4th dimension instead?

    1. Re:4 dimensional by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Cool, I can store it in my Klein bottle when it's not being used!

  31. But there already IS something better by Skraut · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    iRiver's iHP series of hard disk players.


    it plays every format you can throw at it, including .ogg and flac, as opposed to the ipod which converts everything to .aac. .aac is great, but that's like a graphic viewer that converts everything to jpeg before displaying it. .aac is a lossy format, so is .mp3 and many of the others. Convert from one lossy format to another and while it isn't as bad as an analog copy, you DO loose some quality.


    That's the design "feature" if the ipod which really is a flaw. Yes the interface is great, so is the integration with itunes, but it's dependancy on only 1 format is not.

    --
    Introducing Microsoft Vacuum 1.0 The first Microsoft product that doesn't suck.
    1. Re:But there already IS something better by Microlith · · Score: 1

      Wow, that was blindingly ignorant.

      The iPod can play mp3 directly, it is not dependent on only one format (AAC).

      Now maybe you're thinking of the stupid 20GB Sony Walkman, which forces you to convert everything to ATRAC3 before loading it on the device.

    2. Re:But there already IS something better by stretch_jc · · Score: 1
      the ipod which converts everything to .aac

      Have you actually used an ipod, or are you simply repeating random crap that you've heard on /.

      The ipod can play mp3s, aac, and apple lossless (if not more). Please know what you're talking about before you post random crap.

    3. Re:But there already IS something better by Arielholic · · Score: 1

      Erm? The iPod doesn't convert everything to .aac, if you throw a .mp3 at it, it will gladly swallow it. If you import a CD wit iTunes, you can set iTunes to convert it to .aac, but also to .mp3.

    4. Re:But there already IS something better by nolen · · Score: 2, Informative

      iPod does not convert everything to aac. It plays mp3, as well as several lossless formats (aif, wav, apple lossless) without converting anything at all. It does not play ogg or wma, true. But that does not make it dependent on 1 format.

    5. Re:But there already IS something better by jxyama · · Score: 1
      iPod doesn't convert anything. you can't just play the formats that are unsupported. (i see your point, though.)

      seriously, do you really believe the "myth" that lossy format makes that much of a difference in the real market after the success of iPod? the reason iPod is revolutionary and people are buying them in bunches is because it can carry a lot of songso. quality of music just isn't such a big deal as much as the fact hundreds of CDs worth of music can be accessed - while on the road, during the commute, while jogging, etc. (and would you really notice the quality difference from mini earbuds and with traffic noise in the background?)

      if the quality of mp3/aac made that big of a difference, then how do you explain the success of iTMS? millions of songs downloaded a week - in (horror) 128 kbps aac!

      money talks. and the success of iPod/iTMS says the majority of the dollars are being spent by those who don't care one bit about the "loss of quality" in their music because as far as they can tell, their songs sound just like it came from CDs.

    6. Re:But there already IS something better by Talthane · · Score: 5, Informative
      Actually, the iPod doesn't convert everything to AAC. Why do you think it's called an MP3 player? It'll play either of those two formats.

      Secondly, AAC can either be lossy or lossless, depending on which format you choose. AAC Lossless is, by definition, lossless (er...hence the name).

      So apart from getting both of those facts wrong, you were almost right :-)

      --
      "This is why men never share their feelings; because women always remember." -Just Shoot Me.
    7. Re:But there already IS something better by dema · · Score: 1

      ...but it's dependancy on only 1 format is not.

      If that were true (it is not), one could just as easily say that the iRiver has great ability to play multiple formats, but it lacks in interface and application integration. If the flawed formats argument is what makes you choose the iRiver over the iPod, that's your choice, it doesn't mean one is better than the other.

    8. Re:But there already IS something better by falser · · Score: 1

      iRiver lithium batteries cannot be replaced by the user. They have an expected life of 3 years, after which you'd have to send the unit back for "repair" outside of warranty.

      Thanks manufacturers, but try again. I won't buy ANYTHING which has a non-replacable life-limiting power system.

    9. Re:But there already IS something better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, iPod plays aac, mp3, and wav native. No, it's not ogg, but it's certainly not converting anything.

    10. Re:But there already IS something better by FortranDragon · · Score: 1

      [...]as opposed to the ipod which converts everything to .aac.

      Hold on there a moment, cowboy. ;-)

      The iPod does NOT convert everything to .AAC. From the iPod Tech Specs: "Audio formats supported: AAC (16 to 320 Kbps), MP3 (32 to 320 Kbps), MP3 VBR, Audible, AIFF, Apple Lossless and WAV".


      AAC (protected) is the format used by the iTunes Music Store.

      --
      "All the darkness in the world can not quench the light of one small candle."
    11. Re:But there already IS something better by DeeKayWon · · Score: 1
      it plays every format you can throw at it, including .ogg and flac,

      No, the iHPs do not play FLAC.

    12. Re:But there already IS something better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >it plays every format you can throw at it, including .ogg and flac, as opposed to the ipod which converts everything to .aac. .aac is great, but that's like a graphic viewer that converts everything to jpeg before displaying it. .aac is a lossy format, so is .mp3 and many of the others. Convert from one lossy format to another and while it isn't as bad as an analog copy, you DO loose some quality.

      Man, oh man! Try to know what you're talking about before speaking up.

      The iPod plays DRM'ed AAC, non-DRM'ed AAC, Apple Lossless, MP3, WAV/AIFF, and audiobooks (can't remember the format right now).

      So, besides OGG (and WMA), there's not much the iPod can't play (as for FLACs, simply re-code them into Apple Lossless and you're set. Since they're both lossless, no problem here).

      Have a nice day.

    13. Re:But there already IS something better by Chilles · · Score: 1

      Too bad you made a faulty statement about the iPod that pissed some people off. You should have kept yourself to the subject and the first line.
      The iRiver iHP players stomp the iPod in every area except maybe looks (depends on who your asking). Cheaper, longer battery life, lighter, better headphones, more supported file formats etc. Usefull accessories such as in car chargers are probably a lot cheaper and they supply more accessories with the thing too.

      All responses to your post are about your claim that the iPod converts everything to .aac (which it doesn't). But no-one is really attacking your actual claim that the iRiver iHP series players are better than iPods. (which they are).

    14. Re:But there already IS something better by marcop · · Score: 1

      IRiver Battery Replacement

      I have an iRiver iHP-120 and like it overall. The joystick control is not as good as the IPod wheel and FWD through long files takes a long time - just like the Lyra. I like it over an IPod, but that is IMHO.

    15. Re:But there already IS something better by beezly · · Score: 2, Informative
      I find that "Application Integration" on the iRiver is FAR better than the ipod. I can for example
      cp -a /misc/music /media/sda1/Music
      or even...
      rsync -r --ignore-existing /misc/music /media/sda1/Music
      Who needs application integration when you have rsync?!
    16. Re:But there already IS something better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which isn't a problem if you start with your legitimate collection of CDs, which Sony, as a music company, believes to be the proper starting point.

    17. Re:But there already IS something better by Microlith · · Score: 1

      Which *is* a problem, as my mother found out, when you rip your CDs using their software the files cannot be moved off that computer. And so she bought a new computer.

      Thank you magic gate.

      So now she'll have to re-rip her entire collection again in a more open format.

    18. Re:But there already IS something better by pknoll · · Score: 2, Informative
      Cheaper, longer battery life, lighter, better headphones, more supported file formats etc.

      More, eh? Maybe more that you care about, but that's not what you said. The iRivier iHP supports MP3, WMA, ASF, WAV, and OGG. That's 5 formats. The iPod plays AAC, MP3, Apple Lossless, AIFF, Audible, and WAV; a total of 6.

    19. Re:But there already IS something better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? You didn't see the apps in the Sonic Stage folder? You know, the one called "Sonic Stage BACKUP TOOL"? I've moved my entire collection on a few DVDs from home to work. The only problem was the work machine (crappy HP) had a hard time reading my DVD-Rs, so I had to network to another machine. But I suppose you'd blame that on Sony as well?
      Sounds like you and your mom share the same genes, probably an extra chromosome #21.

    20. Re:But there already IS something better by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      Seven formats actually:

      AIFF, WAV, MP3, MP3 VBR, AAC, Apple Lossless and Audible.

      I guess VBR counts since some MP3 players don't support it? Not whoring here, I just get sick of people thinking they are locked into Apple formats. The list also reminds others of what their players can't handle... like audiobooks.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    21. Re:But there already IS something better by dema · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying one is better than the other, I haven't used either. My point is that his argument about one being better than the other because of his needs is flawed. If my mom wanted to get a portable mp3 player, I highly doubt she'd care to use rsync. But someone else, like yourself, may find that far more convienent. This is your opinion, and this the iRiver is a better choice for you. Does that make it better than the iPod for everyone? Hell no.

    22. Re:But there already IS something better by chochos · · Score: 1

      Don't forget AIFF and WAV. So it reads 5 audio formats.

    23. Re:But there already IS something better by chochos · · Score: 1

      Actually, the iPod doesn't convert anything to anything else. You can use iTunes or other software to convert between formats. The iPod just plays them. It can play AAC, MP3, AIFF, WAV, Apple Lossless, Audible, etc.

    24. Re:But there already IS something better by Chilles · · Score: 1

      Again, the only response is to a small error in the post rather than to the message in the post (i.e. iHP is better than iPod in a lot of ways).

      But you're right, I should have checked my facts.. with the iHP supporting ogg, mp3 and some others and the iPod supporting "only" mp3 and some others I automatically assumed the iHP's "some others" would be greater than or equal to the iPod's "some others". So I'll restate my erroneous statement as follows: "more useful supported file formats".

    25. Re:But there already IS something better by pknoll · · Score: 1
      I might agree that the iHP bests the iPod in some areas, notably the battery life. I haven't run out of juice given my listening habits so far, but I imagine it could become an issue if my lifestyle were to change dramatically. We shall see.

      The formats the iPod supports are the ones I need, so more/different ones are irrelevant to me, as I suspect the iPod formats are to you.

      My opinion is the one place the iHP really loses to the iPod, though, is the interface. This is a subjective statement, dependent largely on preference, and so an opinion. YMMV.

      I also like the iPod for the end-to-end integration it offers, via iTunes and the iTunes Music Store, but I can't really compare that to the iHP since I don't own one. If it has comparable services, so much the better.

      I guess my point is (and I apologize for being so brief in my previous reply, I was just irked) that I don't and cannot consider the iHP superior to the iPod, nor the reverse. They are different, that's all. Vive le concurrence!

      If your iHP meets your needs, congratulations. I hereby validate your purchase. My iPod meets my needs, and so your arguments about how iHPs are "better in a lot of ways" simply have no traction with me.

    26. Re:But there already IS something better by Chilles · · Score: 1

      My +1 Sane moderation of the day goes to you sir.

      Different needs different gadgets.. indeed. I have no mp3 player (I borrow My friends iHP from time to time though). I ripped all my CD's to .ogg so I'd need something like an iHP or a very very good reason to re-rip my cd's. And I guess I'm prepared to accept a crappy UI for that.

      I think I was implicitly accusing the other replies to the post I originally replied to of blind iPod fanboyism. At least in your case that wasn't justified. So please accept my sincere appologies.

  32. Not a KILLER? by mrn121 · · Score: 1
    RCA's Lyra 40GB iPod 'competitor.'

    In other news, the phrase "ipod killer" has been replaced with a new foriegn phrase on slashdot: "ipod competitor."

  33. Re:Consumericanism. by torpor · · Score: 1

    Typical .. you think just because there is 'merican' in there that I'm only talking about Americans?

    No. There are consumericans here in Germany too. That this particularly nefarious social disease started in America, with its 'our cars are bigger than your car' doctrine, is immaterial to the actual meaning of the word.

    Funny, though, that you would think that Consumericanism is only an American disease, given that countries predilection for exporting such things...

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  34. Speaking of portable music players... by gumpish · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It seems the Rio Karma hasn't had a feature bump since it's introduction last year. Sure, it's pricing is on par with the 20 GB iPod (and the Karma comes with a dock, featuring an ethernet port, not to mention native support for Ogg Vorbis and FLAC), but I think Rio can do even better. =)

    1. Re:Speaking of portable music players... by Milican · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well I thought this would be a great device until I saw some reviews on Pricegrabber.com. Looks like there are some serious issued with hard drive durability.

      JOhn

    2. Re:Speaking of portable music players... by Erwos · · Score: 1

      Honestly, it just makes you want to kick them in the nuts.

      The Rio Karma _could_ have been the killer digital music player. It had the ethernet cradle, the OGG/FLAC support, a good interface, and a decent price.

      But they just dropped the ball halfway. There's no USB mass storage support (yes, I know they have their own FS), which is a deal-breaker for those of us who need storage on the go. It won't export to Samba on the network.

      Frankly, I'm more likely to buy an iRiver and make the thing work with an NSLU2.

      -Erwos

      --
      Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
  35. Re:Consumericanism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    What the fuck... you put most of a country's name in a word like that and then get vaginal when someone thinks you're talking about that country?

    There's nothing about it or your comment that indicated it was meant to be a generic term encompassing people all over the world.

    So take your sneer and cram it sideways.

  36. More MP3 player support for macs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I saw the headline, I figured this was going to be an article about how more MP3 players were going to start offering support for Mac computers.

    For people who own only Macs, the iPod is pretty much the only choice for MP3 players, apart from MP3-playable CD players. Are any of Apple's competitors going to offer support for OS X?

    1. Re:More MP3 player support for macs? by j0kkk3l · · Score: 1

      There are many MP3-Players available for the Mac. Every Player, that acts as mass storage kann be easily filled on a Mac by Dragging and Dropping of MP3s to it. It only has to support being FAT32 formatted, which all I know of do. For some players there are even iTunes Plug-Ins, that synchronize certain Playlists.

    2. Re:More MP3 player support for macs? by l0ss · · Score: 1

      I have a Rio Chiba and it works perfectly with my PowerBook. Everything is done thru iTunes just like the iPod. I think all of Rio's products work on OS X.

  37. Re:Consumericanism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently Canadians feel that they can be called "Americans" because they live in North America.

    That's funny, because the last time I called a Canadian an "American" he launched into a 20-minute rant about how Americans are a bunch of fast-food-eating, SUV-driving, Republican-electing morons that are ruining the world.

  38. Design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's with the vintage case design? Looks like my AIWA walkman knock-off from 1988. Bleah.

  39. Re:Consumericanism. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "mask its innate desire for fascism?"

    Huh? Where does that come from? From what theory is that derived?

  40. for the new visitors to slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    slashdot has been bought out by doubleclick.

    welcome to www.slashad.org

    I for one welcome our new..... so on and so forth

    1. Re:for the new visitors to slashdot by Technician · · Score: 1

      slashdot has been bought out by doubleclick.


      I didn't notice. Doubleclick is in my ipchains...

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  41. What's the problem? by IvanD · · Score: 0

    If you are keeping a 60min file to go over on 6 mins... and kill your battery doing so.. over and over. Wouldn't you better.. skip it? If you don't want to hear it... delete it!

    Besides, how long does it take to your walk-man FFW a 30min cassette?

    I thing the fact that you are not able to hear MP3s is more important.

    1. Re:What's the problem? by Big+Boss · · Score: 1

      The author was trying to get back to where he stopped listening to an audiobook file. As an audiobook listener, I can understand where he is coming from. Hell, the ones I download from Audible.com come in 6 hour chunks. You don't want to skip it, because there is still a fair bit to listen to at the end.

      The iPod isn't perfect for audiobooks either. I can FF *VERY* quickly. But the bookmarks leave much to be desired. I sometimes have issues with it forgeting where I was. Apparently, the work-around is to play something else and when I come back to that file, it remembers. Annoying. It should be able to save when I power down.

  42. I have the old version of RCA's 40 gig player... by Jomboni · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's the Lyra RD2840. It's got it's faults but overall it's a great player for what I need it to do. Initially, it had lots of problems. You couldn't resume a track from where you left off if you turned the unit off and back on, the track would start over. If you had both mp3s and wma files on it, there was static when it switched between the 2 formats. Shuffle was buggy, etc... these were all fixed in a recent firmware upgrade though. FFW is slow on mine, but not as slow as the review says it is on the new model. Playback isn't gapless, but it's "pretty close." Battery life so far seems to be about 10 hours continuous play, 7-8 if I shuffle around, so that's not bad. It comes with an AC adapter, cigarette lighter adapter, carrying case, and the headphones are better than the typical stock headphones. The downside: For some reason, the line-out is a 1/16" jack instead of the usual 1/8" headphone sized. An adapter is included though. Also, it requires a 5.5v AC adapter, which I have had trouble locating online... so if you lose your adapter I'm not sure what you'd do. Occasionally, if you shuffle around to songs that aren't in order, the song will start about 1/2-1 second into the track. The one feature that sold me, over everything else, is that it's one of the few players that doens't require any special software. It's recognized as a standard external USB drive, you just copy files over to it like you would any normal drive (so you can also use it to store other files besides music). There IS a Windows system tray application that you use to "profile" the device, which scans all the id3 tags so that you can browse your songs by artist/genre/album/etc. But you don't need to use it, because the player has a profiling feature built in! It's just a little slower than using the windows app. In other words, this player is PERFECT for linux users. And, they're cheap. I got mine refurbished on ebay for only $160. At that price, for a 40 gig player that includes all the accessories and requires no software and runs effortlessly under Linux I don't mind the few faults it has!

  43. Re:Again? Look, can we just take it as read by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

    1.) it's ugly
    2.) no integration with iTMS
    3.) too big to fit comfortably in a pocket
    4.) doesn't play AAC

    --
    -mkb
  44. No surprise its crap by nels_tomlinson · · Score: 1
    ... 6 minutes to get to the end of a 60 minute file.

    It's not surprising that it's crap: we've known for decades that RCA stood for Remarkably Crappy Apparatus.

  45. REPOST - I have the old 40 gig RCA player... by Jomboni · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It's the Lyra RD2840. It's got it's faults but overall it's a great player for what I need it to do.

    Initially, it had lots of problems. You couldn't resume a track from where you left off if you turned the unit off and back on, the track would start over. If you had both mp3s and wma files on it, there was static when it switched between the 2 formats. Shuffle was buggy, etc... these were all fixed in a recent firmware upgrade though. FFW is slow on mine, but not as slow as the review says it is on the new model. Playback isn't gapless, but it's "pretty close." Battery life so far seems to be about 10 hours continuous play, 7-8 if I shuffle around, so that's not bad. It comes with an AC adapter, cigarette lighter adapter, carrying case, and the headphones are better than the typical stock headphones.

    The downside: For some reason, the line-out is a 1/16" jack instead of the usual 1/8" headphone sized. An adapter is included though. Also, it requires a 5.5v AC adapter, which I have had trouble locating online... so if you lose your adapter I'm not sure what you'd do. Occasionally, if you shuffle around to songs that aren't in order, the song will start about 1/2-1 second into the track.

    The one feature that sold me, over everything else, is that it's one of the few players that doens't require any special software. It's recognized as a standard external USB drive, you just copy files over to it like you would any normal drive (so you can also use it to store other files besides music). There IS a Windows system tray application that you use to "profile" the device, which scans all the id3 tags so that you can browse your songs by artist/genre/album/etc. But you don't need to use it, because the player has a profiling feature built in! It's just a little slower than using the windows app.

    In other words, this player is PERFECT for linux users.

    And, they're cheap. I got mine refurbished on ebay for only $160. At that price, for a 40 gig player that includes all the accessories and requires no software and runs effortlessly under Linux I don't mind the few faults it has!

    1. Re:REPOST - I have the old 40 gig RCA player... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      typcial slashdotter writes:
      "oh, but it is still not an iPod, so it obviously sucks."
  46. Re:Consumericanism. by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 2, Insightful
    From your journal:


    damned cold here in germany.

    can't say much else. wish someone would send me some good moviez sites or something, that'd make the cold and grey go away for an hour or two.

    I'm thinking you kinda invalidate any right you may have thought you had to grouse about American "consumer marketplace economics" when you lazily request Hollywood warez sites be e-mailed to you in your perch in Germany.

    Maybe we're just supposed to send you warez sites for those great German movies. Yeah, that's it, that's what you meant...

    As far as America's "innate desire for fascism" goes, uhhhh, don't you think might be just projecting a teensy bit? Fascism is on the rise, all right. But we Americans are dorky amateurs at it. You guys remain the world-class professionals at it.
  47. Re:Consumericanism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In his simplistic worldview, we're all little Hitler clones, running around, fucking each other's wallets and beating brown people.

    It's ok, he's just ignorant. We should pity him.

  48. -1 Overrated? Coward.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Btw, how the fuck can something be "Overrated" if it hasn't been rated in the first place?

    Answer me that, gropeadope.

  49. Re:Consumericanism. by Hatta · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    mask its innate desire for fascism?"

    Huh? Where does that come from?


    Our puritanical heritige. We were the last country to give up slavery. We committed genocide against the native americans. We have one of the bloodiest histories of labor relations in the western world.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  50. When you hurt Apple, you hurt Mr. Trumbe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Can we stop grousing about this issue now? Please?"

    You're so silly.

  51. Slow women by smudge8 · · Score: 1

    http://www.acronymfinder.com/af-query.asp?p=dict&S tring=exact&Acronym=FFW
    Yeah, spending that much money on an iPod clone only to find it made my fully-figured woman slower would be a pain in the butt... I paid good money for that doll, too.

    1. Re:Slow women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I paid good money for that doll, too.

      Which one?

  52. Re:Consumericanism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Uh, what, hello.. there are still some ME and African countries that practice slavery. We certainly don't have the lock on genocide. And our history, while bloody, pales compared to Europe and the Soviet Union.

  53. Re:Off Topic/Folding at home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why only 19 people Folding at home?

    Because the program is apparently buggy and frequently runs away with all my CPU. I HAD to uninstall it to use my machine.

  54. Excellent post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All this coming from the country that voted Hitler into power. I think you guys can keep your mouths shut for a while.

    You're like an ex-con who recently found Jesus, now you go around thinking you're better than everyone else.

  55. Re:Again? Look, can we just take it as read by xrissley · · Score: 1

    Well, whereabout is ogg used and evangelized apart from inside /. readership (and not all of them, from the number of iPod users)

    Can we get past this?
    Ogg is certainly a good format, it just happens to interest very few people.
    As open format we have Ogg, but nobody is interested.
    As open-standard format we have MP4 (AAC), and that is getting some traction, surely (not ALL AAC are copy protected, you know?)
    As closed-standard proprietary format we have WMA, and we know we cannot accept it.
    So Ogg could be the winner, but AAC seems second best.
    Could have been worse. You know?

    --
    =====
    I lie all the time, including now
  56. Re:Again? Look, can we just take it as read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >1) it's ugly
    >2) no integration with iTMS
    >3) too big to fit comfortably in a pocket
    >4) doesn't play AAC

    5) no integration with iTunes
    6) ?
    7) Profits!!!

  57. Re:Consumericanism. by ratamacue · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Who's this "we"? I'm a US citizen, but I committed none of those crimes. I am a peaceful individual, not an aggressor. I will NOT be held responsible for the actions of other individuals, let alone the actions of government.

    I am exactly responsible for my own actions. No more, no less. I take offense that you imply that I somehow had something to do with those crimes.

  58. Yikes! by Tower · · Score: 1

    I read that as RC Lycra for some reason (maybe as I grow older I am developing dyslexia)... I can't (won't!) imagine a whole bunch of Apple Fans running around with remote control Lycra pants/etc... in fact, the whole idea of Apple Fans in lycra/spandex is frightening (it is almost Halloween, though...)

    --
    "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
    1. Re:Yikes! by CottonEyedJoe · · Score: 1

      Some Apple fans *do* wear Lycra, me included. I average about 35 mi a day in lycra. In the summertime I race in lycra and I imagine all my competitors run Wintel when they arent riding a bike. I'm not terribly proud of my looks but I've been told I dont look half bad in lycra.

      Nevertheless, I've already got an iPod and probably wont be buying any RCA lyra's (or lycra fo that matter).

    2. Re:Yikes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like a village is missing one of its citizens.

  59. Probably SDMI related by rjw57 · · Score: 1

    The SDMI (http://sdmi.org/) specifies that portable music devices should only be able to fast forward at a certain speed (the reason for this escapes me). My MP3 player before the iPod actually stated this as a feature in the manual!

    --
    Rich
  60. Competition by SJ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What are you talking about?

    Apple fans WANT something to fret about because thats what makes thing better. The worst thing that could happen to the industry is for no one to bother challenging Apple.

    See what happened when no one challenged Microsoft?

    Apple fans WANT some one to beat the pants off Apple, 'cause it means that after Apple has gotten up off the floor and brushed itself off, it is going to come up with something freakin amazing to get back into the game.

    Thats what makes healthy competition great.

    1. Re:Competition by altek · · Score: 1

      I certainly agree with you on your point that there needs to be competition for product evolution (at least for the consumer).

      I guess I just don't see how you can claim that nobody challenged M$... I remember Apple kicking and screaming against them, but the company was in a very bad position at the time, remember "Apple is dead" and then Jobs' triumphant return and such ...

      I think Apple did really challenge them, but were a fairly weak foe at the time... that seems to be changing a lot, especially since the first iMacs...

      anyway. peace

      --
      THE MAGIC WORDS ARE SQUEAMISH OSSIFRAGE
  61. Why? by kitzilla · · Score: 1

    Why would we Apple fans be upset if someone brought out a really cool portable audio player? Either we like the iPod or not. I know there are platform fanatics that confuse brand and personal identity, but most of us just like our gear for whatever it does. New products just drive prices down and give everyone more choices.

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
  62. Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To agree with Relativity, one of those numbers should be in units of time -- i.e. the product lifetime in seconds, if that review is accurate.

    1. Re:Time by samekt · · Score: 1

      1 cm = 3,33E-11 seconds

    2. Re:Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't that be 1 cm(centiminute?)=0.6 seconds.

    3. Re:Time by samekt · · Score: 1

      No, I was referring to the fact that you can convert between any two SI units. Meters can be converted to seconds using the speed of light, for instance.

  63. Re:Consumericanism. by FortranDragon · · Score: 1

    We were the last country to give up slavery.

    No. Brazil, for example, didn't abolish slavery until 1888 and Brazil had even worse conditions than the US. (And, no, I'm not saying this in anyway lessens how wrong we were to allow slavery exist. I'm just pointing out we weren't the last to do the moral right thing.)

    --
    "All the darkness in the world can not quench the light of one small candle."
  64. Why is this so difficult?! by Anita+Coney · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First, give us non-proprietary batteries. Not only to keep it from becoming a paper weight after a couple years, but also to be able to toss in some other batteries if you forget to recharge it.

    Second, give us an easily to use intuitive interface. In other words, TEST IT WITH REAL PEOPLE BEFORE YOU EVEN ATTEMPT TO SELL IT!!!

    Third, allow us to sort and organize our music without any proprietary software crap. Simply let me transfer my MP3s by artist/cd name folders. If you want proprietary crap for newbies, let that be an option, not a mandate.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  65. Re:Consumericanism. by cremes · · Score: 2

    (obligatory ad-hominem)
    You're a dumb ass.

    cr

  66. Re:Consumericanism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "You know, that White-Picket Fence "keeping up with the Joneses" agitated nervousness that comes as a result of being breast-fed consumerican ethics from the day you were born .."

    Nothing of the sort.

    The fact is, most other companies have proven that once they get to the point of being in a monopoly state, start building crap and giving the consumer shit they don't need, ignoring all their failings.

    Apple, on the other hand, acts as if their market share nor do their users wishes and needs expectations exist. This is actually a good thing under the right influences. If you listened to all the fanboys, you'd have a 120G iPod that could play full motion pictures in Xvid and play Ogg and maybe hook up Mame and a few controllers and heck, we need a projection unit on this and otherwise. I have one of those things from Apple...its called an Powerbook. It doesn't need to fit in my pocket. I want something that makes music and nothing more.

    Apple is one of the few companies that once its in a position of power, it isn't trying to shore up the power with artificial bullshit that no one needs for its product class. Instead, they focus on making the shit better. Personally, I don't care for the photo bit of the new iPod...but it was almost the least they could do considering color screens are nearly as cheap as the screens they current use (they'd had to mode to the 2 color screen on the cheaper model it displays Black and Blue as it was what the company that made the old screen moved on to). Its a nifty hack, but I really don't want more than that, even if it had power to do more.

    Apple puts out good products. If others put out an inferior product that caught the attention span of the public, we'd all suffer. Its happened in the past. The iPod won't be at its 70% mark forever, and it will eventually happen again. The fact that Apple is at 70% and the next highest is at like 5% even though its selling for half of Apples price and 2x the features (what ever the fuck that means) probably means that its past the point of consumerism -- it means folks are buying it almost solely because they realize its the best of class and its worth just a little more to have.

    And just to make certain this doesn't get modded up:

    Fuck All Ya'll

  67. FFTW? by KevinDumpsCore · · Score: 3, Funny

    I misread the post, I thought the complaints were about the speed of its FFTW, the Fastest Fourier Transform in the West! I thought the author wanted to criticize the quality of its fourier transform functions.

  68. Re:Consumericanism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have recived the benefits and responsibility of those past actions.

    Additionally, in a civilization you are responsible for far more than just yourself alone. You gain the benfits of shared resources, pooled security, and improvments that are greater than the sum of its parts.

    But I suppose if you had children you would expect them to take care of themselves, more likely, its the responsibility of the lady you knocked up. Same for your elderly relatives. Would you deny that is the minimum of your responsibilities?

  69. In short... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Yes.

    It's got alot to do with validating a 300+ dollar personal music player to yourself and then seeing something better come out.

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    1. Re:In short... by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      I suspect that for me, that "something better" might very well be this unit reviewed by Tom's Hardware:

      Archos Gmini 400 - http://www6.tomshardware.com/mobile/20041021/index .html

      Which plays music (MP3, WAV, WMA), acts as a digital photo viewer (ala new iPod), but can also transfer those photos off of your compactflash card via the built-in CF interface (adaptors to other formats available), and can also view movies in DivX format (either on the screen, or utilizing the included video-out port for a regular TV set).

      Oh yes, and it's also a portable gaming system...

      And it's the same size as an iPod. 20gb version now, hopefully larger soon.

      Is this an iPod killer? I don't know, but it's currently where I'd put my money.

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
  70. Re:Consumericanism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    You live in a democracy. All people are directly responsible for what their government did, because the government is representing you and your wishes. If the U.S. Government does something you don't like, guess what?

    You did it.

  71. Beta? by sflory · · Score: 1

    Get past the beta stage. Simple it was a purely marketing decision. Either they rushed it to market before they completed a full beta cycle. Or they knew about the bug and figured they'd fix it later. This common in the industry. That's why the 1st I do when I get a product hardware or software I look for an update. Also why I never buy something when it 1st comes out.

    --
    IANALBIPOOGL (I am not a Lawyer, but I play one on GrokLaw.)
  72. Re:Consumericanism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree with you completely, but I sense the trolls will come 'round to feed...

  73. Re:Consumericanism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, not all Canadians have the same opinion! Stop the presses!

  74. Re:Consumericanism. by ForemastJack · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This got moderated +5 insightful? The hell? Was someone blinded by the low UID and edgy sounding pseudo-postmodern claptrap? The first paragraph/sentence doesn't even end -- it's a goddamned fragment.

    The whole comment reads like some frothy liner note from a Rage Against the Machine album. "Consumerican"?! Holy shit.

    Glad to see that freshman Social Psychology class is going so well for you...

  75. Re:Consumericanism. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I can't accept that the children are necessarily guilty of the sins of the parents and must attone for them.

    I try to correct wrongs when ever I can, but wrongs commited before I was born I have no control over. Most of those that have commited the crimes are long dead. The slaves are free, the natives are still being given reparations for events that happened over a century ago.

    In fact, my own ancestors weren't even in the US during these times.

  76. Re:Consumericanism. by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

    Did it ever cross your mind that he might be an American who currently is in Germany?

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  77. Re:Consumericanism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    First, we do not live in a democracy. It is a democratic republic. If it were a democracy, your statement would be correct. There is a level of responsibility that the electorate has in the actions of the elected, but not to the extent you are suggesting. In a pure democracy, the actions of the government are dependant on the opinions of the people. In a representative democracy, people are elected to represent the people in the decision making process, to make the right choice for the people, not necessarily the popular choice.

    This is more than an esoteric distinction, it is a fundamental difference. BTW, this is why character is essential, and not a secondary consideration. We are electing people to stand in for us, to make decisions for us, not just to merely parrot our own opinions. If I'm going to have someone assigned to make all my decisions for me, I want to trust that they have some sort of moral framework on which to base their decisions.

  78. MOD PARENT UP by ChrisCampbell47 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    no points today ...

  79. Thank goodness usability matters somewhere. by dpbsmith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The big revolution from, say, 1973 to 1980 was making computers affordable, an activity which the IBMs of the world had no interest in whatsoever. They saw microprocessors as a direct thread to mainframes and sought use them in limited ways and protect products like the DataMaster from cannibalization by cheap general-purpose PCs. The result was that the personal computer revolution was fueled by technies and hobbyists.

    From 1980 to 1990 it was all about making computers usable and seducing ordinary people who had no interest in learning how to program in BASIC or learn a traditional CLI. The result was a revolution in usability. The overall computer usability experience (not just the GUI shell, but quality, installability, and usability of applications, ease of adding peripherals, etc.) probably peaked in the Mac world circa Apple System 7.

    Ever since then, it's all been slowly downhill, as user familiarity and "computer literacy" have increased the tolerance of the general public for complexity, crashes, and other things that are now accepted as "what computers are like." Usability has been in a slow but perceptible decline.

    You can see it in all sorts of little things. The latest Dell computer we got has six USB ports on the back, two of which are totally unlabelled and four of which are in close proximity to the letters "A," "B," "C," "D" in circles which are spaced closely together and are not aligned with the USB connectors they are probably labelling. There are color-coded, iconically labelled jacks for speakers and headphones, and but no obvious clue as to where mouse and keyboard are supposed to plug in.

    Meanwhile, every new gadget I buy has a microprocessor in it... and usability problems. The $10 thermometer I bought in a drugstore has several different measurement modes, all incomprehensible, controlled by two unlabelled buttons and an LCD screen which displays not only the temperature but smiley faces and pictures of a running stick figure while emitting incomprehensible beeps. I can guess that if it tells me my temperature is 98-something degrees it is probably in Fahrenheit mode and if it tells me it's 37-something degrees it is probably in Celsius mode, but I'm darned if I know how to set it, or what it is that I'm doing that causes the mode to change.

    My cell phone comes with a 100-page manual but frequently emits strange beeps and displays messages that the manual does not explain. (In this case, the explanation is that the cell phone user interface as experienced by the user is a combination of what the phone itself does and what the specific set of services offered by Verizon does. But the user experience is one of a low-quality UI.

    Thank goodness there is at least one arena in which the market is apparently still rewarding usable design.

    1. Re:Thank goodness usability matters somewhere. by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      The A, B, C, D are above little lights. The lights are more or less "troubleshooting" lights.

      The light codes are listed in the Dell Owners Manual.

      Dell also doesn't ship USB keyboards and mice with their desktops, unless you ask for them. They usually ship a dell branded bargain Keyboard/Mouse PS/2 combo. The PS/2 ports have pictures of a little mouse and a keyboard with color coding.

      The problem you seem to have is that you're old. Old people have a hard time figuring things like computers and cell phones out.

      If you just read your owners manual and maybe do some google searching, you'll be able to figure out these new-fangled doohickies.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    2. Re:Thank goodness usability matters somewhere. by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Psst...

      A B C D are motherboard status lights, they have absolutely nothing to do with the USB ports. If your motherboard has a problem, you can tell what that problem is by looking what combination of lights is turned on... if all lights are green, you're good to go. (Next time you turn your computer on, watch the lights in the back change as it goes through POST.)

      Tons of motherboards have these and, as a person who has to support Dell hardware all the time, I'm really glad to see them. Beep-beep-beep-beep! Oh crap, let's see... A is lit, D is lit... that must mean... malfunctioning RAM stick. Swap the RAM, there we go, fixed!

      Why would you label USB ports? They're all the same.

    3. Re:Thank goodness usability matters somewhere. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USB ports are not all the same. Try this. On a Windows box, plug in a printer to one of the USB ports. It should auto-detect it and install it.

      Now unplug the printer from that port and plug it into one of the other ports. It will be auto-detected and installed again.

      You now have your printer installed twice, once for each USB port you plugged it into. Try printing something, and try to figure out which printer you should select.

      If the USB ports were all the same, this would not happen.

    4. Re:Thank goodness usability matters somewhere. by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm just talking about the machine we received, which my company resells with our equipment.

      It came with a Dell-branded USB keyboard and mouse. It has no PS/2-style ports on it.

      And it came with no manual. Presumably we pay less for them that way.

  80. Re:Consumericanism. by ratamacue · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    All people are directly responsible for what their government did, because the government is representing you and your wishes.

    Isn't that how Bin Laden thinks? His objective is to punish US citizens for the actions of their government.

    I say bullshit. The ruler and the subject cannot, by any stretch of logic, become one and the same. You cannot, at the same time, (1) posess the "right" to initiate force as a means to an end, and (2) NOT posess the "right" to initiate force as a means to an end. (Posession of the unique "right" to initiate force is the only absolute way to define government.)

  81. Re:Consumericanism. by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

    Did it ever cross your mind that he might be an American who currently is in Germany?

    Sure it did. And I figured he'd tell me so if he wanted to keep the conversation going.

    Who are you, his mother?

  82. Re:Consumericanism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry. I had a turd in my pocket.

  83. Re:Consumericanism. by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

    Our puritanical heritige.
    It's the same well from which we draw our religious tolerance. I'll take it.

    We were the last country to give up slavery.
    Wrong.

    We committed genocide against the native americans.
    We fought against many Native American nations, aided and abetted by many other Native American nations, some of whom "we" betrayed, some of whom betrayed "us." If you think of the hundreds of tribes that populated the N.A. continent before white settlers came as some kind of happy hippie commune of mystic warrior-poets bound together in love and mutual respect, you've been too-long Disney-fied.

    We have one of the bloodiest histories of labor relations in the western world.
    Compared to the UK? Italy? Australia? Please.

    Hey, you missed one: America has the lowest per capita of weepy, self-flagellating, achiever-despising socialists in the world as well! Oh, how will we ever survive?!?!

  84. Re:Consumericanism. by ratamacue · · Score: 1
    You have recived the benefits and responsibility of those past actions.

    Prove it.

    You gain the benfits of shared resources, pooled security, and improvments that are greater than the sum of its parts.

    Sounds like the socialist's laundry list. Force me to accept your "benefits" now, so you can blame me later on for your acts of agression.

    I suppose if you had children you would expect them to take care of themselves

    What exactly does this have to do with my refusing to take responsibility for the actions of government? You seem to be confusing voluntary support with forced participation in socialism. Then again, isn't that what socialism is all about? Blurring the line between voluntary association and force?

  85. Re:Consumericanism. by torpor · · Score: 1

    I'm thinking you kinda invalidate any right you may have thought you had to grouse about American "consumer marketplace economics" when you lazily request Hollywood warez sites be e-mailed to you in your perch in Germany.


    yeah, coz you know, all my points of view, over all time, are supposed to 'make sense' to each other. uh huh.

    thanks for pointing out my hypocricy though, thats a sure-fire defeat for the argument that america is a consumerist-whore society that is eating the earth.

    As far as America's "innate desire for fascism" goes, uhhhh, don't you think might be just projecting a teensy bit? Fascism is on the rise, all right. But we Americans are dorky amateurs at it.

    No, Americans are seasoned pro's at the spread of fascism, I'm afraid. Not only that, but your economy (war machine) is dependent on the continuation of this condition. Americans are nothing without War.


    You guys remain the world-class professionals at it.


    -1 point for assuming that I'm German. Nice!

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  86. Re:Consumericanism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pwned!!!

  87. Re:Consumericanism. by Hatta · · Score: 1

    I stand corrected.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  88. Re:Consumericanism. by Tanktalus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Canadian (n): An American in all but name, who is proud that s/he doesn't have the name.

    (Yes, I'm Canadian.)

  89. Re:Consumericanism. by torpor · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I will NOT be held responsible for the actions of other individuals, let alone the actions of government.


    *sigh* and heres' the problem. You *SHOULD* take responsibility for the actions of your government, IT IS YOUR GOVERNMENT.

    That you are piously inclined to not see that in fact, you Dont Have The Right to not take responsiblity for the actions of your government, should show you how much of a mess you are in.

    It is because Americans refuse to take responsibility for the actions of their government, that you don't see the results of those actions reported on your beloved television 'free media'...

    You (you know, 'the public') don't want to see the results of the wanton application of America War Machine over the last 50 years, you only want to benefit from the economic rewards presented to you by it ... but there are people out there in the world right now, many thousands upon thousands of them in fact, whose lives (and limbs) have been changed, irrevocably, for that fact.

    I take offense that you imply that I somehow had something to do with those crimes.


    The fact is, American Citizen #93208239, you had everything to do with those crimes. And I am not surprised that you take offense; you (and your country) always do.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  90. Because it doesn't work!!! by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

    The number one MP3 player happens to use proprietary batteries, therefore validating the concept that proprietary batteries aren't bad. People DO buy them iPods after all. That and the batteries are servicable and replaceable!

    The iPod already has one of the most intuitive and time tested interfaces.

    And the iPod uses a proprietary software interface to sort and upload music. That has NOT stopped it's adoption, so again this shows that users don't care. At least, not enough users care. You may, but not the rest of the world who buys iPods.

    It's very unfortunate for you.

    1. Re:Because it doesn't work!!! by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      I have no idea what the "number one" single is today, but I'm certain of one thing: It's crap. The fact that the iPod sells well means absolutely nothing to me.

      I totally agree that the iPod's interface is intuitive.

      I have no problem with a proprietary software interface for all of those brainless newbies. I only want a direct approach for those of us with brains.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    2. Re:Because it doesn't work!!! by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      The fact that the iPod sells well may mean nothing to you, but you still have to accept the fact that it is true and that you can't separate it's success from it's marketing, design, and functionality.

      So you have brains, whoohoo. Doesn't that mean you understand that you should do what you are good at (choosing songs to play, rating songs you like, deleting songs you don't) and that you let the computer do what it's good at (organizing, sorting, storing, categorizing, indexing, and compiling the songs)?

      The proprietary software interface does two things that make the iPod so successful:
      It creates an index of all your songs and playlists to increase performance and to increase battery life.

      This index is stored in ram so that when you browse genres, artists, ID3 tags, playlists, and albums, the hard disk is never hit. That makes it super fast, efficient, and reduces the amount the hard drive ever spins up.

      Does that mean, because you have a brain, that you want to compile the index yourself? Or that the iPod should tax it's resources (battery and CPU) doing so?

      Another thing about iTunes (and it's proprietary interface) is that if you so wish you CAN create your own directory structure for all your albums, CDs, artists, etc. Then all iTunes does is upload (and don't you know, since the iPod is mounted as a firewire mass storage device, it uploads it as a straight file transfer) the songs and the index. Nothing else.

      But maybe you already knew that? Because that's pretty direct, to me. Plug in the iPod, wait one minute, unplug the iPod.

    3. Re:Because it doesn't work!!! by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      I'll say it again: I'm not criticizing the iPod's interface!!!

      But there are two reasons why I'd never buy one: First, I can't simply drag and drop music on it like a hard drive. (If I'm wrong about that, let me know.) All I want to do is to put my CDs in subfolders on the drive and hit "shuffle" and have it randomly pay across it.

      The second reason I'd never buy an iPod is because of the proprietary battery. I currently use an ancient (by today's standard) Rio RioVolt SP250. I took all my favorite songs and put them on 12 discs. At about 12 hours a disc, I have about 6 days worth of music. The cool thing about the SP250 is when the batteries die, I can simply toss in two AAs and have it work again. I'd much rather have a shorter battery life AND the choice to use standard batteries versus having dead proprietary batteries that last a long time. Dead batteries that last a long time BUT cannot be replaced are pointless to me.

      I'll continue to use my SP250 until something comes along which allows me to do the same things I can do now. If that's forever, I can live with it.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    4. Re:Because it doesn't work!!! by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Different design goals means different design outcomes. I wasn't talking about the iPod interface at all, I was explaining why/how the iPod gets it's 12 hour battery life and performance.

      Since you don't care about the battery life or performance, then the design artifacts necessary to achieve those two goals actually become impediments to your adoption.

      See, I only use rechargeable AAs; so the act of charging a AA vs charging an iPod is negligible, so rechargin an iPod every day (if I listen to it for 10 hours) or every week (if I listen to it for an hour a day) doesn't hurt me. I also have a cell phone I charge every week, so that habit is already there. I actually like that I can listen to my iPod for 10 hours at a time, so that's useful to me.

      The other design artifact of a proprietary battery is size... but if you are happy with a RioVolt SP250, then size is obviously not an issue for you, either.

      My iPod fits in my pocket, lasts the entire drive from here to the bay area (5 hours), and also happens to have 25 minutes of skip protection for free because of it's design. Those things are valuable to me, as well as the ability to access all my favorite songs without swapping disks (about 3.4gb right now, which would translate to 6 CDs to your 12. Man, you've got twice as much music as me! Your collection wouldn't even FIT on an iPod mini!).

    5. Re:Because it doesn't work!!! by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      Oh I would like something smaller. But I do think an iPod sized device could be built with two replaceable AA batteries.

      The problem is that manufacturers are hyping battery life in these portable devices. And to achieve better battery life, proprietary batteries are needed.

      To analogize with fuel efficiency, it'd be a like a car with great gas mileage, but the car is extremely inconvenient to fill up with gas, i.e., it took hours and you could only do it at a couple of locations. The time and ease of simply changing batteries are more than worth the cost of those batteries. You can always earn more money, but you can never earn time.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    6. Re:Because it doesn't work!!! by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      I have no problem with a proprietary software interface for all of those brainless newbies. I only want a direct approach for those of us with brains.

      Well, it must be you that is the brainless one if you assume that only brainless people want easy to use software.

    7. Re:Because it doesn't work!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The entire "put your mp3s into folders and hit shuffle" concept is very outdated. It allows you to hit random, but it doesn't allow you to do much beyond that.

      What if you want to hear random from only your favorite songs? What if you want to hear random from certain genres? certain artists? certain alblums? What if you only want to hear songs you added to your collection in the past month? What about songs you haven't heard in the longest time? What about songs you've never heard? What about if you want to call back that song you heard yesterday but can't remember the name?

      The iTunes / iPod combination lets you do all the above and much more. I play a song on my iPod and next time I plug into iTunes it syncs the Last time played,playcount and all lists & smartlists I created on either the iPod or through iTunes. ...and it does it all transparently. Imagine how much work it would take if you tried to do all that through a set of subfolders?

    8. Re:Because it doesn't work!!! by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      It's all manner of things. To acheive it's size the iPod has to have proprietary batteries: Look at the take apart sites, the iPod batteries are like credit cards!

      And without all of these indexing and ram tricks, the battery life would be nowhere near 8 hours for the mini or 12 hours for the full sized.

      Maybe in a year or two someone will be able to take an iPod mini drive, slap it into a full sized iPod shell, with regular AAA batteries and still keep the performance and battery life, but right now it's physically impossible. Sorry.

      For me the cost of charging overnight is zero. It's one of those tradeoffs for size, performance, and convenience.

    9. Re:Because it doesn't work!!! by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you're right. I keep forgeting those things have hard drives, and while they're small, they're not quite that small.

      I guess I'll be waiting a long time! Flash drives keep getting bigger and bigger. So maybe I won't have to wait too long. Thanks for your help.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  91. both are nice by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 1

    Go with the iriver. :)

    Functionally, I don't see much of a difference between the two. I was able to pick up a 120 for about $200 on ebay, and given that it plays ogg, it was a no brainer for me, as that's what much of my music is ripped in. Paying list for each, though, I'm not sure there's much distinguishing them except for the file formats each supports and the wheel thingy.

    Well, i just looked closer at the ipod. It has contact lists and appointment reminders. If you use those, that might sway the decision. I preferred the built-in microphone in the iriver, as I've been able to record some meetings without having to use an external microphone. Ipod also has a sleep timer to fall asleep to music without using all the battery - I think my iriver has something like that, but I'm not sure (not on hand to check).

    Good luck - either unit would be nice.

    1. Re:both are nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a large size HD player go with the iRiver. I have an iHP-120 and it's great.

      iRiver also has the iHP-3xx series out now with color screens and photo support (gotta wonder where Apple got that idea, eh?).

      But personally my favorite device available now is the Rio Carbon. It's a 5GB player, smaller than the iPod Mini, with way more functionality. It's $250 at most stores. I bought one and am loving it. The iRiver lives in my car now.

  92. Re:Consumericanism. by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

    Who are you, an American?

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  93. Re:Consumericanism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if I say you're to blame for Hitler and should take responsibility for your crimes, what say you?

  94. A consumer oriented society by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    So after they chose the iPod and they find the next week that XYZ company produced a better product or an equilvlant product at the same or less cost. Then the consumer feels like they have made a bad decision and have wasted their money.

    The great thing about living in a consumer oriented society is that companies will take back ANYTHING in around thirty days. Didn't like the color? Back it goes. Sure there are downsides but the very liberal return policy most stores have is not one of them. Smile at the return counter people and you can return anything. And really, a lot of people do take advanatge of this so I don't see it as much of an issue.

    So if a better player really comes along, people need not shed a tear - just return it, or head over to eBay where (for an iPod at least) you'll get almost full price anyway.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  95. Re:Consumericanism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Johnson and Woodrow demonstrated in their recent study that so called 'african-american' people belong to a different species. Show, how exactly is slavery wrong, or more wrong than using horses?

    Perez-Gilaberte

  96. Re:Consumericanism. by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

    Who are you, an American?
    Ya gotta ask?

  97. Re:Consumericanism. by ratamacue · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    The fact is, American Citizen #93208239, you had everything to do with those crimes.

    Bullshit. That's exactly what government wants you to believe. I will never accept the proposal that the ruler and the subject are one and the same.

    Over 10,000 innocent Iraqi civilians are dead because of decisions made by the US federal government. You want to relieve them of that responsibility and put the blame on "the people". That's bullshit. What if, for example, I've voted Libertarian every single election, every single race? (The Libertarian party has very little, if any, influence on the policies of the US governments.) Are you still going to hold on to your ridiculous claims?

  98. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RCA announced a new portable 40 GB tape back-up device.

  99. Re:Consumericanism. by Poppler · · Score: 1

    Maybe we're just supposed to send you warez sites for those great German movies. Yeah, that's it, that's what you meant...

    Actually there have been some great German movies.

    --
    What's the ugliest part of your body? Some say your nose, some say your toes, but I think it's your mind. -Zappa
  100. Re:Consumericanism. by torpor · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    My god, you have seriously lost the plot.

    It is not "The Government", like its some sorta separate corporation that you can just decide not to 'be a consumer of'.

    It exists, ONLY ON THE BASIS OF THE RESPONSIBILITY of and for and by its citizens: YOU.

    Thus, actions it takes 'in the name of its citizens and for the nation of america', ARE the responsibility OF its citizens. Directly, and as a cause of!

    Your disconnect is because you are a victim of a calculated conspiracy to produce 'consumer paeon slaves of a corporate state' who begrudgingly hate its government and bear its sins, in the name of global dominance, yet all the while refusing to take any responsibility, in the meantime.

    AMERICAN: You Are Your Government.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  101. Re:Consumericanism. by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

    thanks for pointing out my hypocricy
    Happy to help.

    though, thats a sure-fire defeat for the argument that america is a consumerist-whore society that is eating the earth.
    Dude, that's not an "argument," that's long-winded grafitti. For every mean, nasty American export you decry, whether it is Starbuck's, McDonald's, or those Hollywood movies you obviously crave, there is some cute l'il non-American country importing them for their cute l'il non-American consumer to consume. Change begins at home, son.

    As for me, I'll keep buying those Japanese cartoons, British music, German cars, and Italian shoes, without begrudging the people or governments of those fine countries their creative and manufacturing skills.

    Hey, I followed that link you provided, and boy, I must say, you really got me beat!! I mean, hey, I just provided a link to a globally-accredited newspaper's story about the growing threat of neo-fascism in Europe. But you, Bunky, you just Owned me! You prop up your argument with a link to a crazed screed by a lunatic jihadist whose parent organization recruits for fundamentalist Islam! Way to win a debate, bro!

  102. Re:Consumericanism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are consumericans here in Germany too.

    We generally don't bother with that term for Germans, though. We just call you Huns or Nazis. Go ahead and blame consumerism on America. You'll always have credit for being the first to apply modern industrial technique to mass murder.

    You're also pretty much to blame for developing the propaganda techniques being used to such great effect by the modern American equivalent to the Nazis.

    Let me tell you, as bad as the stain of Iraq is on America, it's nothing like the stain you guys wear. Your souls are permanently black and you exist as a nation because of the world's mercy and forbearance over a half century ago. If there was justice, the German people would have been scattered and Germany salted.

    So take your sprockets german bullshit elsewhere.

  103. Re:Consumericanism. by ratamacue · · Score: 1

    Congradulations, you are a model statist. (There's no point in arguing with you any longer, because I see now that you have been fully converted and programmed to believe in the process of democracy.)

  104. Re:Consumericanism. by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

    Actually there have been some great German movies.

    You're absolutely right, and I'm a big fan, particularly of Fritz Lang's work. But it's not like draws upon that vast vault of Great Teutonic Cinema is exactly burning up the P2P nets and torrents world-wide, is it?

  105. Re:Consumericanism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, but you see, you don't really take responsibility for your own actions any more than our grandson of the Nazis Torpor does. You live merely under the illusion that you take responsibility. If you took responsibility, you would understand all the ramifications and consequences of your actions, or at least be willing to find out what they were. You'd know that every time you drove your car, you were killing the planet a little, instead of living in your freemarket fantasy. Free Markets don't absolve you of your sins.

  106. Re:Consumericanism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you voted libertarian instead of for Gore, than the weight of 10,000 dead Iraqi civillians is on your shoulders. You've chosen to be as ineffectual as possible, as if this will some how relieve you of your responsibility.

  107. Re:Consumericanism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But you live in a house built of bones. That doesn't bother you? It all happened a long time ago, to strangers. Instead of blinding yourself to your own guilt and participation, why not open your eyes?

  108. Re:Consumericanism. by torpor · · Score: 1

    First of all, I am not German (or European for that matter), so I'm glad you Americans kicked Hitlers ass. Thanks for doing that, mate.

    Second of all, were I to be German I would assume that my responsibility is to let the history of my now-democratic country to continue to serve as an example of the Cause of Justice, since Hitlers government no longer exists (thanks again, Americans) and had its crimes exposed in court at Nuremberg (thanks again America), and justice was actually served to all those whose crimes were disclosed by the free world (America, woowoo!), I would say that the issue of responsibility is entirely resolved in the case of the Nazi's. The bad guys went to jail, end of story. (Yup, America again!!)

    Those guys ain't in power no' mo', they've been hanged and handled. The Nazi's got their dues.

    50 years of continued American war, and countless U.S. War Crimes, however, have not been dealt with. U.S. War Criminals have not. The U.S. continues to aggressively invade, under whatever pretext it chooses, foreign nations, and looses its war machines whenever stock inventory (bomb shelf life) seems to warrant it. Completely ignorant of, nay flaunting, International Law.

    But, coming back to Hitler (heh heh..), since the Nazi's were dealt with, justice served under International Law and by International Standards (thanks again America), well .. the U.S. sure have committed a lot of war crimes by those same standards. For which its people continue to refuse responsibility for, just like happened with those Big Bad Germans (one last ta, America!!) ...

    You can compare the U.S. to Hitler, in fact you must if there is to be any value to the lesson at all. For the sake of those who died under his evil grip, those alive today, and those yet to be born!

    There's video of U.S. War Crimes! Hitler didn't have video!! (pity)

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  109. Re:Consumericanism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You seem to be confusing voluntary support with forced participation in socialism.

    You seem to be under the impression that you can withdraw your support from your government. Go ahead, try it. Stop paying taxes. Right now. Start today with sales taxes. Refuse to pay them. The fact is that you are NOT a free man, and there are precious few places on this earth, if there are any at all, where you could claim to be free.

  110. Re:Consumericanism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, you missed one: America has the lowest per capita of weepy, self-flagellating, achiever-despising socialists in the world as well! Oh, how will we ever survive?!?!

    That's a very good question, and the answer is that, unless you've got money and powerful connections, not very well.

  111. Re:Consumericanism. by ratamacue · · Score: 1

    Um, no. I agree with that 100%.

  112. Re:Consumericanism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    People like you are exactly the reason why I claim to be Canadian when I travel outside the country. Not because I'm unpatriotic, but because people like you have made it dangerous to be an American.

  113. Re:Consumericanism. by torpor · · Score: 1

    Well, y'know, we all serve the dialectic.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  114. Re:Consumericanism. by torpor · · Score: 1

    What are you, the slashdot police?

    #1: Low ID's mean nothing, sonny-boy, get that in your thick head.

    #2: What do you think the word 'comment' means?

    #3: Sig-Psych!!

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  115. Re:Consumericanism. by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 2, Funny

    People like you are exactly the reason why I claim to be Canadian when I travel outside the country. Not because I'm unpatriotic, but because people like you have made it dangerous to be an American

    Oh, man, you mean you don't like me?

    Now I'm going to be sad all day long, you big bully!

  116. Re:Consumericanism. by torpor · · Score: 1

    .. get vaginal ..

    hey, geeze, don't make me look it up in the dictionary for you:

    "consumerican" != "american".

    there, you happy?

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  117. Re:Consumericanism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gotta love libertarians. In what other religion (except perhaps Scientology) can you dismiss anyone's opinion with such a pseudo-scientific sounding term as "statist"? Brilliant stuff, Ayn Rand was a great comedian.

  118. Re:Consumericanism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Consumerican" isn't even in the fucking dictionary, so what the fuck does this stupid little post of yours have to do with anything?

    Answer: it doesn't, and you're just trying to change the subject.

  119. Re:Consumericanism. by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1
    you had everything to do with those crimes

    Sorry, no. I voted for the other guy.

    I helped campaign for the other guy. I talked to all my friends about voting for the other guy. I contributed to the other guys campaign. There's not a whole lot more I could have done unless I wanted to go to jail.

    What the current administration has done does not reflect my beliefs in any way, shape or form, but there is a limit to what any one individual can do in the process. Now, if you want to say collectively, on average, the American people are to blame, you'd have more of an arguement (Though I'll remind you, the other guy got the more votes).

    As far as the media goes, it's not mainly a responsibility issue. One of the main reasons we don't see more events from the world in our media has more to do with 5 megacorps owning 95% of the media outlets in the US, and the people who run them know which side their bread is buttered on. The other is the fact that the average American is woefully ignorant in geography and world politics ( Note I said average. Once again you can't say all of us are.), and so programs on those don't necessarily get great ratings. The most any citizen can do is try to make sure the right( well, we are talking politicians... make that 'better') guy gets in office. So no, I did not have 'everything to do with those crimes'. I tried to prevent them. Sorry.

    If you are going to lay blame at my feet for what's going on, then the same blame is laid at your feet for being a 'world citizen'. What exactly are you doing to fix the problem?

  120. Re:Consumericanism. by lashi · · Score: 1
    >Canadian (n): An American in all but name, who is proud that s/he doesn't have the name.

    >(Yes, I'm Canadian.)

    My guess is that you are a Canadian who has never lived outside of Canada

  121. Re:Consumericanism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You talk a lot about US war crimes, and spray hyperbole around like water, but I don't see much backing-up of the accusations you're making.

    See, it's fashionable these days to call Bush Hitler and pretend the US is root of all that ever was evil in the universe, but there's not any substance behind the froth, as it were.

    Have fun with your hatred. Watch out for ulcers.

  122. Re:Consumericanism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, the negro is a different sub-species from us.

    Negro slaves doing the same tasks as horses is a waste and misuse. Negroes have opposable thumbs, nearly to the degree of Homo sapiens sapiensis, so they are better used in e.g. the manufacturing industry than dragging carriages.

  123. Re:Consumericanism. by Poppler · · Score: 1

    True. Just about everything in the "German" section you can find on torrent sites are German releases of Hollywood movies.

    --
    What's the ugliest part of your body? Some say your nose, some say your toes, but I think it's your mind. -Zappa
  124. Re:Consumericanism. by torpor · · Score: 1

    Democracy? Who said anything about democracy?

    I'm talking about resonsibility.. but don't worry, we don't have to keep talking about it. I know you know very little about it, and have little interest. Perhaps there's something good on television?

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  125. Re:Consumericanism. by ratamacue · · Score: 1

    I'm not a libertarian, because I dismiss completely the proposal that the initiation of force (government as we know it) can be moral and just. Even libertarians believe that some initiation of force is necessary to "secure" society. (Even the most limited government must collect its revenue through coercive taxing.)

  126. Re:Consumericanism. by ratamacue · · Score: 1
    Democracy?

    The belief that it is moral and just for a majority to initiate force as a means to achieve the majority's objectives. I don't believe in that principle.

    Perhaps there's something good on television?

    I don't watch television.

  127. Mod the parent up. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    I looks like some Apple Zelot Moderators got to this one. And Overrated it to oblivian, to help their egos with their product that they bought they decided to Mod the writter down because he doesn't feel that Apples are a good value. Just as the kid when he runs out of good comebacks on why his toys are better will often result in fighting with him or just instults. There will be people who don't care for apple products and people like the parent who have used apple but doesn't consider it a good deal for his use. Apple loyalist are not amune to the phenomenon proven by the action of lowering the parents mod. Because when they feel infearior they will often strick back in other ways to protect their ego.

    Yea I am not going anonymous coward on this one and I am a Apple User and I like apple. But his post was valid and worth at least the score of 2 if not a 3 or 4

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Mod the parent up. by dn15 · · Score: 1

      You make a good point, but it is a bit misleading for the original post to say Apple products are not a good value when they just talk about is a $6,000 system they got 10+ years ago. He may still feel Macs are a good value, but I doubt that was the cheapest system available at the time, and a $6,000 machine is a far cry from today's $799 eMac. :)

  128. Apple is so far ahead it's almost pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not a big fan of Apple's stuff but even to someone like me it's clear that Apple is so far ahead of the rest of the industry on this, I can't even say that it makes sense for Sony or MS or anyone else to even bother. This is a case of innovators vs. corporate money-hounds, and Apple has learned from their past and covered their bases and built up a formidable wall around themselves before bringing the iPod and iTunes store out. Maybe this will be a lesson to the rest of the industry, that there is some wisdom in investing time and money and ideas into products, not just marketing research and half-assed guesses. It sure feels good to watch a company nurture a great idea that everyone else said was certain to fail while would-be competitors throw themselves on their own swords in a rush to get a piece of it all (even if it is Apple.)

  129. Re:Consumericanism. by JonKatzIsAnIdiot · · Score: 1

    There, there. I'm Canadian, and I like you :-)
    Not everyone up here is a weepy, self-flagellating, achiever-despising socialist. (thank you for that one, BTW) Just most of us.
    Unfortunately.

  130. Oops! Edited version of parent by dn15 · · Score: 1
    Oops! Should have reviewed my post more carefully. Edited version:
    You make a good point, but it is a bit misleading for the original post to say Apple products are not a good value when they just talk about a $6,000 system they got 10+ years ago. He may still feel Macs are not a good value, but I doubt that was the cheapest system available at the time, and a $6,000 machine is a far cry from today's $799 eMac. :)
    1. Re:Oops! Edited version of parent by psbrogna · · Score: 1

      Yes, the $6,000 system was a highend mac $10 years ago. The other 1/2 of the equation at the time: a comparably equipped PC for around $4,000.

  131. My turn to "me too!" by freeweed · · Score: 1

    I bought a 2840 around this time last year, for just over $450 cdn. This at a time when 40gb ipods were > $700 cdn. Hell of a lot of money saved for something that's still smaller than my old Walkman (but my ipod-owning friends insist my player is waaaaay to heavy and large to carry around...). But, same capacity, better features overall, for $250 less? That's a lot of extra ramen in my diet.

    It's a pretty damn nice unit too, as the parent mentioned. Ideal for use under Linux, and as a portable hard drive in general. I have to laugh when I want to borrow a song from a friend with an ipod and he/she tells me "um, you can't find specific FILES, they're just numbers". As I use my mp3 player as backup for my desktop's mp3 files, it's nice to know that I can just copy them back if I lose a hard drive.

    One other cool feature is it supports the playlists that Winamp and XMMS use - so it's easy to make custom playlists for the thing. One issue with the built-in profiler that the parent may not be aware of - it can only handle about 1600 files. I imagine it's RAM-limited, so when it builds its tables they can only get so big. But who the heck browses by the old standard of artist/genre anyway? :) Playlists pretty much cover this for me.

    Having said all that, if RCA is trying to compete dollar for dollar with the ipod, they don't stand a chance. Not enough people care about the USB hard drive factor, sadly (and no, being able to store only non-playable mp3s on an ipod is just not enough).

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  132. Re:Again? Look, can we just take it as read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, ugly is debatable.

    Not everyone wants to use iTunes, so being almost forced to do so with an iPod is a disadvantage as much as the Karma not being integrated is.

    And if you're not using iTunes, AAC isn't really a concern.

    I don't know about the size.

  133. Re:Again? Look, can we just take it as read by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

    Be careful. Buyer beware, this product may not be as good as the specs say... if these build quality and durability issues haven't been addressed that these reviews mention.

  134. Beta? FFW has been a problem at RCA for years by NerdMachine · · Score: 1

    The Lyra RD1071 128Meg Flash MP3 player (2003 model?) has a painfully slow FFW (5x) and the FRW doesn't even work unless you get the latest firmware patch (try explaining that to your grandmother who wants to listen to audio books). It has many other design flaws such as not remembering where in the file you were when you last stopped listening, and remembering which file was playing when the batteries fell out. All of this could be fixed in firmware by a single Indian developer working 1 month costing Thompson/RCA a huge $500.

    But I have been dealing with Microsoft products for many years now and I expect to see bugs and report them. However, when you call their technical support, you get a neophyte that is only capable of reading the manual back to you. When you ask for the next level of technical support you will hear her say
    "We don't have a technical support department, just a customer support", and
    "We don't have an engineering department so there's nobody I can submit your feedback to", and
    "The Lyra can't play audio books, just music", and
    "You have an older model. Perhaps you should buy a newer one".

    After writing a few emails and getting past the automated responses, I think I made it to the next level of hell because I got this response:
    You may write to Manager, Consumer Relations at Thomson. The mailing address is: Thomson, PO Box 1490, Durant, OK 74702-1490.

    Needless to say, Thompson's LYRA products aren't iPod killers, they are Thompson killers. I know Apple tech support isn't all that great either (2 personal experiences), but at least they have a tech support.

    In the end, I downloaded a bunch of free software and wrote myself a perl script to convert large MP3 files (such as audiobooks) into 5 minute segments.

    --
    --NerdMachine
  135. How to split large MP3 files by NerdMachine · · Score: 1

    mp3splt (http://mp3splt.sourceforge.net/) is an awesome tool to split large MP3 files (audiobooks) into smaller ones and even can auto-adjust the break so it's at the nearest silent part. Alone this is a great tool:
    mp3splt -f -a auto -t 5.0 *.mp3

    However, most audiobooks are a little slow, but with soundstretch (http://sky.prohosting.com/oparviai/soundtouch/sou ndstretch.html), you can increase the tempo without changing the pitch. The result is an audio book that you can "read" 50% faster without losing any clairity. Tune to your own tastes.

    Since soundstretch only works with .wav files, you need mpg123 and lame and a perl script like the one that follows to pull the whole thing off.

    #!/usr/bin/perl -w

    # Speedsplit.pl
    #
    # Use at your own risk.
    #
    # 1) convert mp3 to PCM (wav)
    # 2) speed up PCM file
    # 3) convert it to mp3
    # 4) split it into 5 minute fragments (at whitespace if possible)
    #

    use File::Copy;

    my ($file, $glob, $path, @command, $tmp, $ext);
    foreach $glob (@ARGV)
    {
    $glob =~ s,\\,/,g;
    $glob =~ s/ /\\ /g;
    @glob = glob($glob);
    foreach $file (@glob)
    {
    next unless ($file =~ s/.(wav|mp3)$//i);
    $ext = $1;
    # print ("SpeedSplit: Splitting \"$file\"\n");
    $file =~ s,\\,/,g;
    if ($file =~ s,(.*[:/]),,)
    {
    $path = $1;
    $path =~ s,:$,$/,;
    }
    else
    {
    $path = "./";
    }
    $tmp = $file;
    mkdir "${path}${tmp}" || die "Cannot make directory ${path}${tmp}";
    # mp3 -> wav
    if ($ext eq "mp3")
    {
    @command = ("mpg123","-v","-w","${path}${tmp}/${file}.wav","$ {path}${file}.mp3");
    if (system (@command))
    {
    print STDERR "command failed: ", join(" ",@command),"\n";
    next;
    }
    }
    else
    {
    copy ("${path}${file}.wav","${path}${tmp}/${file}.wav") ;
    }
    # wav -> increase tempo
    @command = ("soundstretch","${path}${tmp}/${file}.wav","${pat h}${tmp}/${file}_f.wav","-tempo=50");
    if (system (@command))
    {
    print STDERR "command failed: ",join (" ",@command),"\n";
    next;
    }
    unlink "${path}${tmp}/${file}.wav";
    # wav -> mp3
    @command = ("lame","-mm","-b","64","-q","0","--tt",$file,"--r esample","22.050","${path}${tmp}/${file}_f.wav","$ {path}${file}.mp3");
    if (system (@command))
    {
    print STDERR "command failed: ", join (" ",@command),"\n";
    next;
    }
    unlink "${path}${tmp}/${file}_f.wav";
    # mp3 -> split
    @command = ("mp3splt","-f","-a","auto","-t","5.0","${path}${f ile}.mp3");
    if (system (@command))
    {
    print STDERR "command failed: ",join (" ",@command),"\n";
    next;
    }
    unlink "${path}${file}.mp3";
    rmdir "${path}${tmp}";
    }
    }

    --
    --NerdMachine
    1. Re:How to split large MP3 files by NerdMachine · · Score: 1

      Oops - sorry. Here's one that won't overwrite your original file. :)

      Dang - can't post full source thanks to the lameness filters. Try just smacking this bottom half on:

      # wav -> mp3
      @command = ("lame","-mm","-b","64","-q","0","--tt",$file,"--r esample","22.050","${path}${tmp}/${file}_f.wav","$ {path}${tmp}/${file}.mp3");
      if (system (@command))
      {
      print STDERR "command failed: ", join (" ",@command),"\n";
      next;
      }
      unlink "${path}${tmp}/${file}_f.wav";
      # mp3 -> split
      @command = ("mp3splt","-f","-a","auto","-t","5.0","${path}${t mp}/${file}.mp3");
      if (system (@command))
      {
      print STDERR "command failed: ",join (" ",@command),"\n";
      next;
      }
      unlink "${path}${tmp}/${file}.mp3";
      map {move($_,'.')} glob("\"${path}${tmp}/\"*");
      rmdir "${path}${tmp}";
      }
      }

      --
      --NerdMachine