Slashdot Mirror


Justin Frankel Reveals Life After Winamp

Joseph Gelinas writes "Speaking out for the first time on life after AOL/Nullsoft, Winamp creator Justin Frankel sat down with BetaNews to discuss his new endeavors. Starting a new company called Cockos, Frankel is leaving behind the mass market for his musical roots, but hints at revolutionary -- and presumably controversial -- things to come."

247 comments

  1. No Kidding.... by the_mad_poster · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm not clicking a link with a name like that. I'm afraid it might be a goatse troll...

    --
    Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    1. Re:No Kidding.... by ZeroGee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seeing as how one of the programs available on that website is "Assniffer," it makes you wonder if he's naming things just to see if stupid people will actually use them in conversation.

    2. Re:No Kidding.... by Hard_Code · · Score: 5, Funny

      I for one think it's a nice leveraging of all that wads of money he made. "Sir, the, um, AssTastic 5000 has arrived...should I connect it to the, uh, sigh, Dumpulator?"

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    3. Re:No Kidding.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha! We're all laughing.

      Shut the fuck up, you dickhead.

    4. Re:No Kidding.... by BlastM · · Score: 1

      Was the name Jesusonic CrusFX an indulgence in saddism on the behalf of Mr Frankel? Imagine the heart attacks that would ensue the arrival of a new CrusFX effects processor at a Christian-boyband-pop recording studio.

    5. Re:No Kidding.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's a joke based on phonetic coincidence:

      A Sniffer
      Assniffer

      haha

      And if you got that one, then you will probably get CrusFX = Crucifix
      where his picture shows the equipment in a familiar cross shape

    6. Re:No Kidding.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you think you are clever?
      on his site: "auto saving sniffer"
      a s sniffer

      sort of along the same lines as your explination except you go and make things up while pretending you 'get' something that others dont.

    7. Re:No Kidding.... by cschmidt · · Score: 1

      Asphinctersayswhat?

      --

      Who am I to blow against the wind? -- Paul Simon
  2. Jesusonic Looks Interesting by FriedTurkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As someone who plays guitar, the Jesusonic looks interesting. Real time effects processing on a computer would allow an amazing amount of customizations of sounds on the fly. However, it doesn't seem very portable despite being a floor device. I don't see someone taking the monstrosity to a jam session. I think it would be more annoying being on the floor than just at a desk. Jesusonic has to be easier than programming those rack mount processors. Hopefully Jesusonic can grow into something to replace the cost prohibitive Pro Tools.

    1. Re:Jesusonic Looks Interesting by somethinghollow · · Score: 4, Informative

      GarageBand is supposed to do on-the-fly filters. And I know Soundtrack does. Apple has been very staunch about on-the-fly effects not only in Audio, but video as well. GarageBand comes with iLife for $50. Soundtrack is $199. Neither of them will lighten your wallet too much.

      I guess Jesusonic might be easier to control on-the-road than having a point and click computer to process your effects, but that is the only bonus I see to having it rather than a computer. But since it has a keyboard, I'm skeptical. If this was meant for the studio, I'd rather have a computer.

    2. Re:Jesusonic Looks Interesting by plover · · Score: 5, Funny

      Perhaps you can have someone bear your CrusFX 1000 for you...

      --
      John
    3. Re:Jesusonic Looks Interesting by eno2001 · · Score: 3, Informative

      So does Ardour. I've been having a lot of fun using it to process my rackmount gear. Haven't tried it on a laptop though... I have it in my home studio.

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    4. Re:Jesusonic Looks Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Why not just use Jack Rack?
      http://arb.bash.sh/~rah/software/jack-rack/
      Loads more effects, low latency and a much nicer interface than Jesusonic.

    5. Re:Jesusonic Looks Interesting by TheMotedOne · · Score: 1

      This seems interesting because I know that as a guitar player individual pedals and FX boxes can hammer the wallet. Having free downloads and virtually unlimited effects is great. It is also a great way to save space on the stage.

    6. Re:Jesusonic Looks Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, no. The nicest interface for realtime guitar FX is something that doesn't use one's hands. That's why all effects are pedals.

    7. Re:Jesusonic Looks Interesting by The_reformant · · Score: 1

      How is this new or different to the other numerous offering out there?

      We have already have plenty of choice in either software/ stand alone hardware units or hybrid systems for example:

      NI GuitarTracks, Amplitube, Line6 Guitar port, Line6 pod series, yamaha DG/AG stomp and numerous others.

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this post is too small to contain.
    8. Re:Jesusonic Looks Interesting by whathappenedtomonday · · Score: 1
      check out Guitar Rig:
      http://mixonline.com/mag/audio_native_instruments_ guitar/

      "realtime" if your soundcard is fast enough; I get 2ms latency on a creative audigy2, and it's just plain amazing.

      --
      I hope I didn't brain my damage.
    9. Re:Jesusonic Looks Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about just making music that doesn't require you to do post processing to make it sound good? The best artists are those that can just play accoustically IMHO.

    10. Re:Jesusonic Looks Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you would want to listen to Linkin Park without the effect processing. Scary.

    11. Re:Jesusonic Looks Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Of course, some of us pine for the days when guitarists actually played every string on the instrument, instead of dropping to D and using one finger chords on the (Low)D and A strings to death and putting in a ridiculous amount of effects into it.

      Maybe the guitar hero will eventually return, saving rock / metal from it's current mediocrity. Sure, Megadeth's "The System Has Failed" album was great, and "The Eyes Of Alice Cooper" was a cool CD, but other than that? Maybe Pillar's "Where Do We Go From Here?", but that's borderline - Where did all the kick-ass solos like Randy Rhoads, George Lynch, John Petrucci, Yngwie Malmsteen, and Eddie Van Halen used to play? Right now the only guitarist that I can think of that I'd truly say was talented is Zakk Wylde.

    12. Re:Jesusonic Looks Interesting by kgbspy · · Score: 1

      What about Dimebag Darr.....

      Oh crap.

      --
      ~
      ~
      ~
      -- INSERT --
    13. Re:Jesusonic Looks Interesting by abigor · · Score: 1

      Look to the underground:

      1. Morbid Angel
      2. Nile
      3. Suffocation
      4. Immolation
      5. Arsis

    14. Re:Jesusonic Looks Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How about just making music that doesn't require you to do post processing to make it sound good? The best artists are those that can just play accoustically IMHO.

      How about just making music you enjoy making? I happen to like playing with effects. For me, they are not a crutch, they are an integral part of my music.

      For the record, I listen to (and play) a lot of purely acoustic music (namely old jazz), but all you "post processing / sequencing / whatever didn't exist fifty years ago is cheating" whiners are making me sick. Music is an art, not a sport.

    15. Re:Jesusonic Looks Interesting by PalmKiller · · Score: 1

      If it runs on windows, then obviously at least a 3 key keyboard is needed (ctrl-alt-del).

    16. Re:Jesusonic Looks Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Jack rack is fully midi controllable.
      You can get a behringer foot pedal with eleven switches and two rocker pedals for about £100.
      It works rather well. :)

    17. Re:Jesusonic Looks Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somehow listening to rock music only played through the clean channel doesn't appeal to me.

      BTW, This isnt post processing its real-time.

      I know what you mean though. Effects don't make you play better it justs makes you sound different -- but in the end it's still you playing.

      The best artists are just that -- the best artists, effects or not.

    18. Re:Jesusonic Looks Interesting by Zeromous · · Score: 2

      You are entitled to your opinion, but how is post production done any different than picasso adding to an unfinished painting.

      Theres just plain no difference between this and an artist who performs their OWN post production. It is a means to acheiving the true sound texture you are looking for.

      Feel free to frown on this activity, but computers are the new harpsichord, electric guitar and moog.
      Only now I dont have to pay somone to make it sound the way I WANT IT.

      Cheers.

      --
      ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
    19. Re:Jesusonic Looks Interesting by I+Like+Pudding · · Score: 0

      Computers already do real time FX processing, along with realtime everythingelse. You can head over to kvr-vst.com and browse through hundreds of them right now (for windows, anyways). The real problem with FX is quality. There are 800 software reverbs out there, and most of them pale in comparison to a 200$ hardware unit (convolution reverbs sound great, but eat all your cpu). I'm far more interested in things like TC's Powercore system. You can drop 300$ on this thing (the pci version, anyways) and get a suite of pro-quality FX that Hans-freaking-Zimmer uses. Bonus for not eating up the processor, because those 8 Absynth and Virsyn Cube instances are already bringing the machine to its knees.

    20. Re:Jesusonic Looks Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow, you have truly shitty taste in music. are you retarded?

    21. Re:Jesusonic Looks Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree Zakk Wylde is amazing to watch play and Megadeth's latest offering "The System Has Failed" just kills Metallica's most recent experiment.

      It's the artists like Yngwie Malmsteen (speed with no emotion) and various 80's copy-cat formula bands that made it not cool to do solos anymore. I think we all needed a break from the whammy bar for awhile.

      Today is a different story though. The time for solos to comeback is now. The whole drop d thing is now played out in the same way soloing was, grunge died with cobain, nu-metal groups are boy bands in disguise and we are at war. Anger is in the air.

      The setting is ripe for a new generation of pissed off ,not in the whining about thier mom not paying enough attention to them type of way but rather pissed off at our society and getting in your face about it type of way.

      What I miss the most is the singing. Im tired of hearing groups that catch my ear but once the singer starts it sounds like he is doing some sort of evil muppet voice (but more muppet then evil).
      Lamb of God, Soulfly and The Dillinger Escape Plan sometimes fall into this catagory. I still like them in spite of the singers.

      Check out Shadows Fall they are pretty good.. they have solos too.

    22. Re:Jesusonic Looks Interesting by ScottyUK · · Score: 2, Funny

      lol, click the bad (double http) Ardour link in Firefox and it takes you to microsoft.com :|

      --
      Nice weather for penguins...
    23. Re:Jesusonic Looks Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weird, my browser said:
      The Proxomitron couldn't find the site named...
      http
      Check that the name is correct. If so, the site may have changed or may no longer exist.

      FAG

  3. Not very socially acceptable by maxogden · · Score: 5, Funny

    JF: Naming projects is often the hardest part. When I first started, it just came out. A moment of either stupidity (likely) or brilliance (not likely), we'll see. Yeah, its obviously hard for him, with names like Cockos, AssSniffer, and Jesusonic.

    1. Re:Not very socially acceptable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I can say is, it takes balls to name your company Cockos.

    2. Re:Not very socially acceptable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No shit, sherlock :-[

    3. Re:Not very socially acceptable by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 4, Funny
      "Yeah, its obviously hard for him, with names like Cockos, AssSniffer, and Jesusonic."

      For all you Slashdotters who love to bash us marketing folks, people like Justin keep people like me in business. ;)

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    4. Re:Not very socially acceptable by Doorjam · · Score: 1

      [i]Yeah, its obviously hard for him, with names like Cockos, AssSniffer, and Jesusonic. [/i] Not to mention SafeSex. Freud would have a field day with him, and I wouldn't blame him.

    5. Re:Not very socially acceptable by JoshRosenbaum · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For all you Slashdotters who love to bash us marketing folks, people like Justin keep people like me in business. ;)

      Yes, because it's creative people like Justin who make the product, and without them, you'd have nothing to name. ;)

  4. Lesson #1 in Business... by _PimpDaddy7_ · · Score: 4, Funny

    Starting a new company called Cockos

    That's a definite no-no...

    1. Re:Lesson #1 in Business... by parliboy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Cockos? Sounds like a breakfast cereal for porn stars.

      "Cock-O's. Now with nuts!"

      --
      "You're never ready, just less unprepared."
    2. Re:Lesson #1 in Business... by DragonPup · · Score: 2, Funny

      or CockOS. The OS for dicks...

      --
      "Useless organic meatbag" -HK-47
    3. Re:Lesson #1 in Business... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silly DragonPup. Dicks are for chicks.

    4. Re:Lesson #1 in Business... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey even have a slogan...
      'I'm koo koo for Cock O's puffs.'

    5. Re:Lesson #1 in Business... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a definite no-no...

      That's how you know it's Justin Frankel.

    6. Re:Lesson #1 in Business... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "little-ohs" that fit around your cock. mmmmmm, tastes sooooooo gooood.... yeeeEES!

    7. Re:Lesson #1 in Business... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They renamed OpenBSD?

  5. Wow so many jokes, so little time... by isa-kuruption · · Score: 0, Redundant

    So a company named 'Cockos' or 'CockOS' (read: Cock O/S) puts out a product called assniffer (read auto-saving sniffer). Is it just me or does this story just reek of bad jokes?

    1. Re:Wow so many jokes, so little time... by big+daddy+kane · · Score: 1

      and the php script for their website is called the 'STD Page Generation System[tm]'

  6. The names he uses for software by The_Rippa · · Score: 5, Funny

    Justin and co. always writes great utilities, but it's really hard to suggest to your boss that the company should be using a tool called "asssniffer" or "ASS I/O".

    1. Re:The names he uses for software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I agree. I'm still recovering from the time I suggested we use Back Orifice.

    2. Re:The names he uses for software by larkost · · Score: 1

      The AppleScript Studio lists have the same problem... people tend to skip the acronyms.

    3. Re:The names he uses for software by Eraser_ · · Score: 1

      Look at his Nullsoft Installer program, which is now used more and more often. It was originally called Pimp, with the installer making program called makepimp. I'm sure if something is actually useful he will make a real name for it, wether that be calling up some marketing friend and asking or taking the time to think of a generic name.

    4. Re:The names he uses for software by gotem · · Score: 1

      just tell them it's a llama's ass

    5. Re:The names he uses for software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      it's really hard to suggest to your boss that the company should be using a tool called "asssniffer" or "ASS I/O".

      Compatibility Guide for Rectaltronics(tm) Butt-Plug Systems

      Interfaces

      * AnusBus, ButtStream RS-66
      * RS-232
      * RS-422
      * IEEE-488
      * HP GPIB
      * Universal Serial Bus (USB) and USB 2.0
      * Firewire / IEEE-1394
      * Ultra2 SCSI (backward compatible to SCSI-2 SE)
      * ATA-100 EIDE
      * Serial ATA
      * Fibre Channel
      * UTP 10/100/1000-BaseT (TCP/IP, supports DHCP/BOOTP)
      * X-10 (limited functionality)
      * Bluetooth and 802.11g wireless
      * Mini-PC Card (Type II)

    6. Re:The names he uses for software by Furan · · Score: 1

      This is true - he originally called waste 'jism'.

  7. I really see this as a growing market by ACK!! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not really sure why but a lot of the marketing types around my office jam in bands and are very tech savvy.

    I see this kind of product if promoted correctly having a very nice niche market among hardcore keyboard junkies and techy musician types.

    Very interesting idea.

    Hardware and software I want to use.

    Hhhhhmmm .... Sounds like a hacker's grand ideal really.

    --
    ACK /ak/ interj. 2. [from the comic strip "Bloom County"] An exclamation of surprised disgust, esp. i
    1. Re:I really see this as a growing market by winkydink · · Score: 1
      Not really sure why but a lot of the marketing types around my office jam in bands and are very tech savvy.

      Wait. The marketing types are very tech savvy?

      I hope this isn't too personal a question, but what color is the sky on your planet?

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    2. Re:I really see this as a growing market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With a name like Cockos, so do I. Eeeew!

    3. Re:I really see this as a growing market by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That's a bunch of bullshit, because if you are not addicted to technowidgets you can eat without selling your soul and telling lies for a living. (Mind you, if I could pull down what some of those marketers and salesmen get, I'd think about shaking the devil's hand myself...) It's the choice between love-for-technology and all-consuming-lust-for-money.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  8. Vague by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't we just read a story about vague products and the people buying them; what is cockos doing diffrent?

  9. quote by _PimpDaddy7_ · · Score: 4, Funny

    Primarily these are a program called Assniffer (which is a HTTP sniffing program that logs the actual files transferred), and PathSync (which I use to interactively synchronize directories on different computers/drives). These are both available on cockos.com.

    assniffer, logs, cockos...you put it together...

    1. Re:quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      assniffer, logs, cockos...you put it together...

      Yeah, I thought he was just suffering from porn overdose after having too much free time on his hands (who are we kidding, we've all been there), but then I read this:

      Which brings us to where the vast majority of my time has been spent lately, which is the Jesusonic.

      Anyone care to comment? Because I sure don't know what to say.

  10. Re:Cockos? by wizbit · · Score: 0, Troll

    Have you seen the name of their products?

    Here's a packet sniffer called Assniffer.

    Other "cool" innovations - the PHP source for their page generation! With (omgzzss11!1one) AUTO-CENTERING OF TEXT!

    Good thing their front page says they're developing "technologies that some people might find interesting. Maybe."

    But they should've added, "...if they snicker at every obnoxious, grade-school dick joke" since that's apparently the theme they've chosen for this crap.

  11. Cockos... wtf by isa-kuruption · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was going to ask what kind of crack he was sniffing and if he'd share, but I guess that's not the best question given the application 'assniffer'.

    1. Re:Cockos... wtf by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes, Justin...you are gay, we get the message. Comming out of the closet can be a traumatic experience, but just take the plunge.

      You are amnong computer nerds, nobody cares what 'ports' you scan, as long as you have an admin's permission. Now just stop with the freaky application names, it's wierding out the AOLers...

      --

      HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    2. Re:Cockos... wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's an inside joke. Remember he worked for AOHell.

    3. Re:Cockos... wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know that it was integral to your ass-inuendo, but it's impossible to sniff crack. Crack is ineffective unless smoked.

  12. could it be by private+Burrito · · Score: 0

    the mistery company behind Exeem?

  13. Re:CockOs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet when he started Nullsoft, his peers ridiculed it as a name for his company.

    $100m later, whose laughing now?

  14. Best Line by DarkHelmet · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Best line of the whole article:

    Not only is it useful on computers, it allows people who don't want to spend money on a Jesusonic hardware device to go ahead and write new effects for the Jesusonic.

    Now there is someone who is completely devoid of marketing, or corporate thinking. He actually has the notion of contributing something on the basis of realizing that some people won't pay for something.

    I suppose at this point he's pretty much made for life, and doesn't have to worry about money anymore. Still, how admirable.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    1. Re:Best Line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not only is it useful on computers, it allows people who don't want to spend money on a Jesusonic hardware device to go ahead and write new effects for the Jesusonic.

      Now there is someone who is completely devoid of marketing, or corporate thinking. He actually has the notion of contributing something on the basis of realizing that some people won't pay for something.


      Really? Unless I'm reading it wrong, it sounds like he's allowing people who don't own the product to increase the value of that product. Eventually, the product will become more and more attractive to non-buyers who will then buy it.

    2. Re:Best Line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +5, Truly Gets It.

    3. Re:Best Line by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      Couldn't agree more. I planned on making some CS:Source maps, and maybe even messing with the SDK some, but apparently to even launch Hammer2 you need to be logged into steam on an account that owns the games. While I can see why valve would want me to actually own one of their games, its just not happening until cs:s is more pro-friendly. Why block me from improving the game?

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    4. Re:Best Line by danila · · Score: 1

      He is not devoid of "good marketing", which is serving the needs of the people while getting paid for that. But he is devoid of "bad marketing", which is trying to control what everyone can do with your product and sending C&Ds and DMCA notices to everyone who does anything not officially sanctioned.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  15. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    What's wrong with CuntOS? Sounds better alongside CockOS.

  16. p2p app by SlongNY · · Score: 1

    I wonder what p2p app they are brewing up... I love waste, works well for what it is. I caint wait till they announce what they are making in the end of january.

    1. Re:p2p app by marktaw.com · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I love Waste too. Though, I disagree with the /. idea that this was a subtle reference, he flat out told us he was going to release something that would revolutionize the internet.

      If I had to guess, it would be a completely decentralized P2P app. A cross between Gnutella & BitTorrent, perhaps with some proxying for anonymity added on top. Proxying will slow you down, but confound the **AA, which he seems to love doing. If you could turn the proxying on & off, you could get a fast _and_ anonymous service. Fast for people who just want to download, anon for people who feel they need it.

      Waste had a lot of protocols that would be useful for proxying, file transfer, etc. He should be able to build something like what I described on top of that.

    2. Re:p2p app by Ulven · · Score: 1

      Surely that would be fast _or_ anonymous.

    3. Re:p2p app by marktaw.com · · Score: 1

      No, I meant fast _and_ anonymous. Fast for those who want it, anonymous for those who want it. Yes, you can't be both at the same time, but the application itself would support both.

  17. Huh? by blackmonday · · Score: 3, Interesting

    First, it's a stupid name. Otherwise, the Jesusonic device looks interesting. I use an incredible device called the Pod XT that makes life very easy for recording, noodling around, or juicing up the amp. One of the things I wished was a way for people to program their own effects/amp modeling algorithms and let people share (or sell) them.

    This gadget looks like it could make it happen. As far as how it looks, I'm sure it's a prototype which will eventually be a slick, portable gadget. I look forward to it.

    1. Re:Huh? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "I use an incredible device called the Pod XT that makes life very easy for recording, noodling around, or juicing up the amp. "

      I just looked at the Pod XT page...very interesting. It shows MIDI in/out, but, also USB port on it. Have you used this to connect to a Linux box running ardour? I'm just a beginner guitar, but like playing around with the idea of recording, and have been looking at open source sequencers and music tools.

      Could you expand on what you've done/tried with the Pod XT? I'm really looking for something to quickly hook my guitar into my computer...

      Other music software:

      Anyway, these are a few of the things I'm looking at, but, just having a hard way to find to get a guitar into my computer without expensive MIDI connectors and pickups...

      Any insight here if the Pod could be used or if you have links or experience with this would be greatly appreciated!!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Huh? by blackmonday · · Score: 1

      The USB connection will give you digital audio through the Pod XT ASIO driver (all free from Line 6). They have drivers for Windows and OS X. Never tried Linux. The Pod XT can become your sound card, so not only can you record the audio in Cubase, you can monitor all tracks through the Pod XT's headphone output.

      There's no driver for Linux, but I can't blame Line 6 for that. I don't know of anyone doing serious multitrack recording using Linux. You use a Mac, or Windows 200 /XP.

    3. Re:Huh? by archen · · Score: 1

      From the ZynAddSubFX page: Please don't use this program to make music that is against God and Jesus Christ.

      Is this deity compatible with the CrusFX 1000?

    4. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think that clause is allowed under the GPL. :)
      Perhaps I'll grab the source, fork the project and specify that only agnostics or atheists may use it. Or perhaps a Diabolic version called SatanFX...

    5. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not in the licence so you can ask people to do whatever you wish - even pay money! Doesn't mean they have to though.

  18. Interesting by albn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...how my $900 PC can replace tens of thousands of dollars in effects processing. I remember seeing a reverb/delay for $3000 with many presets and you can program some yourself.

    Okay, now that my PC can do effects processing, it can also be used as a multi-track to replace the Alesis ADAT that's has thousands of dollars in add-ons, and can replace a mastering studio and save me thousands there becasuse of my DVD/CD burner. What is still expensive are the instruments, consoles (yay AMEK), and the $14,000 tube mic.

    I do not know. Somehow I just cannot let those old things go.

    --
    Some call me Howie Feltersnatch
    1. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever hear of ProTools? Reverb/Delay and so much more! Mac-based, none the less!

    2. Re:Interesting by albn · · Score: 1

      No I have never owned a mac and have not used a studio in 15 years. A lot has changed since then.

      Ping-ponging, SMPTE, "automation" with the really expensive replacement modules, tons of electricity, battling/splicing tape, take after take, hundreds of hours editing, mastering, and trying to meet deadlines. Not only that, the music went nowhere. It came a time I gave it up and did something else while all that stuff collects dust.

      Now all that has changed it seems... now all you have to do is turn on a computer, download some software and you are good to go.

      One thing that makes me wonder, professionals still use good ol' analog equipment and I still see the monster consoles I used way back then. Then again, I havenot kept up with the industry in a very long time. I guess it is time to do some research on advancements in recording/audio engineering.

      --
      Some call me Howie Feltersnatch
    3. Re:Interesting by The_reformant · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is caused by two main things, firstly a PC has a LOT more raw processing power than any digital hardware fx unit. The reason its much cheaper is that PCs are a commodity item whereas high end musical equipment isnt hence the price difference.

      However the best stuff is of course still analogue and remains quite pricey.

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this post is too small to contain.
    4. Re:Interesting by albn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "However the best stuff is of course still analogue and remains quite pricey."

      That's up for debate. The digital advocates of the day argued it has much better sound quality, bigger headroom, and signal to noise ratio can surpass 90dB. Also, the generation loss was minimal, but depending on your equipment (the old rule crap in, crap out comes to mind and why good cables, consoles, and maintainance). However, digital processing was VERY expensive. I recall a Marantz CD recorder was around $3,000 took up 5u's of rack space and also had an optional computer program which was an additional $10,000. So many opted for DATs and other digital recorders if the higher ends were too pricey. ADATs, DA-88's, DATs come to mind for multi-track and mastering equipment.

      Analog on the other hand many advocates said it is "warmer" feel to the sound (which is true... sometimes you just cannot beat the vinyl sound :D), and at higher IPSs, the sound got better, (but man, you could go through the tape.) and sometimes, you could reach near digital quality with the right equipment albeit can be just as expensive once it is all said and done. I remember somebody not clipping at a +9mB when hitting a crash cymbal and it still sounded crisp and not flat. That was nice.

      And I bet some can remember the the so-called 4-8 track "multi-track Fostex porta studios that used cassette tapes that went at a higher IPS, but still sounded like crap :D I remember those sold pretty well for budgets.

      Now, with the CD/DVD burners are next to nothing AND come with software, it amazes me why more people are not getting serious with recording. The only thing that still needs to be perfected (which I doubt will ever happen) is the simulated high-end console, tube mic and instrument. I have never seen any digitized instrument that sounds as good as somebody with talent playing it.

      Again, there is only so much a computer can do and comes a time when people make a piece of music have a quality all in itself.

      --
      Some call me Howie Feltersnatch
    5. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please don't get rid of your old hardware you'll be sorry. Though the ADAT has it's own sound, There are computer based recording systems that are superior now if you pay attention to your DACs and clock-sync etc. There's always someone to shout Protools, it's the standard. Where do these people come from? From talking to many friends, I think the move to the PC has caused a lot of pain and real hardware is usually simpler to get work done.

    6. Re:Interesting by The_reformant · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more of fx like reverbs and whatnot than multitracks. YOu mentioned tube mics a couple of times now...with a lot of people using SM57's and SM58's is there a huge benefit to using massively expensive mics? I mean even some pretty big bands record using basic shures ..trying to get the live sound i guess.

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this post is too small to contain.
    7. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use this mic:
      http://www.digitalprosound.com/2003/07_jul/r eviews /mxl_v69.htm

      It is only $250-300, and I have been extremely pleased by its sound. Granted, it's the most expensive mic I've ever used, but I'd imagine that for any home studio type like myself, it would work superbly.

    8. Re:Interesting by albn · · Score: 1

      I talked about tube mics because better mics = better sound. I also prefer tube mics over condenser mics because the overall warmth and depth it produces.

      You may be right when you say alot of big bands like Shures and may be useful in some appications, but when you are recording voice, nah uh.

      --
      Some call me Howie Feltersnatch
  19. Re:CockOs by stupidfoo · · Score: 1

    who's laughing?

    And no, there's nothing wrong with the name Nullsoft. In fact, it's a great name. Having "Cock" in a company name is clearly stupid.

    Good luck on never selling a damn thing. F'en juvenille.

  20. There is more to a name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "It's a stupid name" means people will be talking about it, and they won't forget it. Great PR.

    And lets not forget how crazy "Nullsort" sounded when it was founded. $100m+ later, whose laughing now?

    Company name != quality of product offered

  21. Cockos, it's what's for breakfast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Seriously, the name Cockos sounds like a gay cereal.

    1. Re:Cockos, it's what's for breakfast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Right- and they aren't coated in sugar either.

    2. Re:Cockos, it's what's for breakfast by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      Just wait until you see what kind of prizes they'll have inside.

      Surely it'll sell better than Goatse O's.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    3. Re:Cockos, it's what's for breakfast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding. And while we're on the subject, he's also working on a program called Assniffer ;).

    4. Re:Cockos, it's what's for breakfast by Chemical · · Score: 1

      Seems to me he lifted it straight out of GTA:SA. See this screenshot. Notice the chicken being choked?

    5. Re:Cockos, it's what's for breakfast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    6. Re:Cockos, it's what's for breakfast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One more. God those guys at Cockstar sure must love cocks.

    7. Re:Cockos, it's what's for breakfast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, until you realize that some chicks like cock too.

      Oh wait... I guess this IS Slashdot...

    8. Re:Cockos, it's what's for breakfast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good, that eliminates sperm, as it's mostly sugar water, with some ammonia, salt, and phosphates...

    9. Re:Cockos, it's what's for breakfast by shish · · Score: 2, Funny

      One thinks you haven't spent enough time on slashdot - the "OS" part of the name obviously expands to "Cock Operating System"

      --
      I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
    10. Re:Cockos, it's what's for breakfast by shish · · Score: 1

      Which, now that I think of it, could have several different meanings o_O

      --
      I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
    11. Re:Cockos, it's what's for breakfast by Zims+Manson · · Score: 0

      OpenCock/FreeCock/NetCock/MicroCock/TinyCock/Compa ctCock/PicoCock

    12. Re:Cockos, it's what's for breakfast by Michael+Hunt · · Score: 1

      Goatse O's?

      Surely you mean Cheerioatses

  22. Pathsync by tayhimself · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Pathsync looks interesting for directory synchronization. Is there something to do this between two linux clients or windows and linux that is rsync or cvs based. Preferably GUI clients or easy to use ones. I need windows > linux backup and linux laptop > linux backup. I saw backuppc in the debian archives, but I'm intersted in user opinions as it is always so much better. Thanks!

    1. Re:Pathsync by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

      isn't there a rsync (or rdist) port for windows? check cygwin

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    2. Re:Pathsync by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try Unison.

    3. Re:Pathsync by jojo1835 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Check out http://www.ifolder.com/ . It's a half open source / half proprietary software piece that lets directories sync between computers, regardless of the OS. Lin to Win, Win to Lin, Lin to Lin, etc...

      Enjoy!

      Tim

      --
      See... and you thought your sig was boring - TT
    4. Re:Pathsync by electrichamster · · Score: 3, Informative

      You'd be wanting Unison then: http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/unison/

      There's Win/Lin/Mac client's, both graphical and console... lovely little app :)

    5. Re:Pathsync by Nurf · · Score: 1

      Pathsync looks interesting for directory synchronization. Is there something to do this between two linux clients or windows and linux that is rsync or cvs based. Preferably GUI clients or easy to use ones. I need windows > linux backup and linux laptop > linux backup. I saw backuppc in the debian archives, but I'm intersted in user opinions as it is always so much better. Thanks!

      Have a look at rdiff-backup. I use it regularly, and I find it very useful for the sorts of things you are talking about.

      --
      ---
  23. I'm suprised he's a windows geek by digitalgimpus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This isn't meant as flamebait but an observation:

    Common hackers of his level of inovation, and to a degree hatred of authority/corporations really dislike windows and love the freedom and inovation of Linux.

    Seems like everything he touches is Windows related.

    Just suprising.

    Though somewhat depressing...

    it's inovators like him, who really make software people like. Say what you will about WinAmp... but it was one heck of a popular app. Same with everything else he was involved in.

    HE is what Linux could really use: someone to create the golden tools.

    1. Re:I'm suprised he's a windows geek by plover · · Score: 1
      I think Linux already has a very large pool of talented developers who are already contributing a vast number of exceedingly cool tools.

      Overall, it seems to me that Windows that has been lacking a large number of open source developers. I think most Windows developers are already of the mindset that "hey, if Bill Gates gets paid for this, so should I." Yes, there some freeware, and even some open source projects that are Windows-based. Overall, though, the Open Source community has always rallied more around the Open Source OS.

      --
      John
    2. Re:I'm suprised he's a windows geek by Strudelkugel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My guess is most non-programmer musicians run Windows, MacOS, Linux, in that order. I would also guess the percentages are quite lopsided in favor of Windows as well. His idea (and I think it's a very good one) is to bring effects processing creative freeedom to the music community, not promote one OS over another.

      --
      Imagine how much harder physics would be if electrons had feelings! -Feynman, maybe
    3. Re:I'm suprised he's a windows geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HE is what Linux could really use: someone to create the golden tools.

      Correction: Someone with money to spend.

    4. Re:I'm suprised he's a windows geek by nbert · · Score: 1
      There used to be more developers creating OSS for Windows IMO. Probably many of them moved to linux. Might be more fulfilling to contribute free software on a free platform, but that's just a guess.

      Here's an old discussionon this topic.

    5. Re:I'm suprised he's a windows geek by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      Would Winamp be as popular or successful if it was a Linux-only app? I doubt we would be talking about Justin Frankel today if we was a "Linux programmer". Winamp has some cool ideas, but the implementation stinks. It just filled a void in a huge market: the mass-market Windows home PC market.

    6. Re:I'm suprised he's a windows geek by ScytheBlade1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I call bullcrap. This IS slashdot, and likewise it's rare to see a "Windows Geek" get posted here.

      Slashdot is also a serious minority. Compare the number of shashdotters to the number of people running windows 98 (at home). We're nothing in number. Consequently, go look at Channel 9. *Tons* of windows geeks. And suprise, some of them just may be worth listening too.

      I'm not expecting too many people to care, but there ARE intilligent people who use windows. Justin Frankel just managed /. posting "about him", which is uncommon.

      (*having premonitions of insightful troll*)

    7. Re:I'm suprised he's a windows geek by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      no, it's just that development environment and library upgrades are free.

    8. Re:I'm suprised he's a windows geek by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      maybe he wants his software to get actually USED by normal people who don't have time to fiddle with their OS constantly.

      on that note, he should be making stuff for OS X...

    9. Re:I'm suprised he's a windows geek by jarsonic · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, as someone who knows Justin as at least an aquaintance, He dabbles with linux a bit, and really loves his Macs (he has a powerbook and a G4 Cube). He's ported winamp to mac for his own personal use (and to see if he could), and he's releasing jesusonic for mac, as well.

    10. Re:I'm suprised he's a windows geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Um, actually he ported macamp to windows in 1997, worked out pretty well for him too.

      Not so good for the author of macamp though.

      read this:

      http://www.betanews.com/article/Death_Knell_Sounds _for_Nullsoft_Winamp/1100111204/

      Specifically the comment near the bottom by Dmitry Boldyrev, it's a much more interesting story than this bit of fluff that somehow warranted a /. story.

      I gather he's stretching/breaking the bounds of some legal agreement but it sure sounds like (he feels that) people he thought were his friends screwed him out of millions and he kind of went off the deep end.

      an excerpt:

      As I was so closely involved, nobody even asked me about Nullsoft sale to AOL. I guess they never considered me anything more than a stupid russian who we can f*** over as much as possible. But personally, I always considered myself a 50% cofounder of Nullsoft (any thoughts on this, Mr Frankel?). So is this the American tactic that we keep hearing about, invite people from other countries, rip off their ideas, enslave them, use their ideas and talant to make money, and then take it off shores to further enslave everyone around? Long live WTO?

      So, now to the story: what TRUELY happened with the whole WinAmp thing.


      I always admired this guy, his software at least, although a lot of it was ports (like the original Mac/WinAmp), I hope he's got it in him to get back to work.

      I'd really like to see some journalist interview the two of them and tell the rest of the tale. At least since the gnutella/aol stuff happened everyone prefers the rebel whiz kid angle on Frankel, but I don't think that's the whole story.
    11. Re:I'm suprised he's a windows geek by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      Actually I would say it's more like this:
      I want to make money in software. Should I code for Windows or Linux? Which has a bigger market share? Windows. Then I shall code for Windows!

      People who are going to write OSS don't have that reason for writing for Windows.

    12. Re:I'm suprised he's a windows geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Winamp filled a much more general void: it was *the original* mp3 player. Not the first, but the first to have any significant features beyond "Play" and "Stop." It was the first with a playlist, EQ, plugin architecture, and hundreds of tiny refinements that make it the perfect mp3 player. You say the implementation stinks - have you seen anything better? Point me in it's direction, I'd certainly be amused.

      Dont forget, XMMS on your beloved Linux started out as a winamp clone.

    13. Re:I'm suprised he's a windows geek by jarsonic · · Score: 1

      True, he did port macamp back in 1997. But what I was referring to was him later as a hobby porting the current snapshot of winamp (I think it was 2.92 or something) to natively run on OSX. He mentioned it a couple times in his .plan, too.

    14. Re:I'm suprised he's a windows geek by shish · · Score: 1

      The jesusonic runs embedded linux and has linux software, assniffer works on linux, as do several other tools. Loads of nullsoft's misc software is only windows-only because only windows needs it (eg screen res changer - X has it built in), and most of the stuff is open source should you feel like porting parts of it - doing a windows port of major software is necessary due to it being the most popular platform, but he and nullsoft seem to be quite happy to do cross platform wherever it's feasable to do so

      --
      I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
    15. Re:I'm suprised he's a windows geek by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      good point. btw, I don't use Linux or XMMS. :)

    16. Re:I'm suprised he's a windows geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newsflash: Windows geeks outnumber Linux geeks. They just don't spend every waking moment pissing on other operating systems like you fucking Linux zealots do. Heres a question for you Linux zealots: how many of you have touched a girl? Normal people realize that an OS is a tool not a fucking religion. What Linux could really use is less fucking zealots.

    17. Re:I'm suprised he's a windows geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Nov 22, 2004 - 10:20 PM
      Truth is, Justin didn't invent WinAmp. Actually Justin Frankel is a liar, but he paid me (Dmitry Boldyrev) off to not say anything. The reason why I had to take the gag and not bring the case, which I intended to do at the time, was because I was poisoned (but who did it? hmmmmmm good question, I am still trying to figure that one out) and couldn't deal with court proceedings.

      Must have been the same people who poisoned Yushchenko...

    18. Re:I'm suprised he's a windows geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he wants to make software that most people will actually be able to use on their computers?

  24. Jesusonic?! by wild_pointer · · Score: 3, Funny

    I bet you dont learn in marketing class to name you products "Jesusonic CrusFX 1000" and make it look like a cross!
    Never ever bind religion to something you dont have to, it just causes trouble!

    On the other hand, I would definitely want one! :)

  25. Isn't "Guitar Rig" the exact same thing? by Viewsonic · · Score: 1
    At WWDC?

    http://www.nativeinstruments.de/page.php?id=wwdc_u s

    http://www.nativeinstruments.de/index.php?guitarri g_us

    For more info.

    1. Re:Isn't "Guitar Rig" the exact same thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The big point about the Jesusonic is that it is on the fly programmable, vs. being able to process a limited set of effects.

    2. Re:Isn't "Guitar Rig" the exact same thing? by FCAdcock · · Score: 1

      But so is a good effects processor and pedalboard.

      I've looked into using a computer and software for effects processing in the past, but frankly I feel that if I'm going that far into the digital world I'd be just as well off selling my guitar and using the computer to PLAY the music as well.

      Isn't the point of playing an instrument actually playing it yourself?

      And I really don't need enough effects in my music to be able to afford to pay for an effects rig with a LCD screen and a keyboard. My BOSS pedalboard and 3 or 4 effects pedals work just fine for me.

      My rig:

      compressor, dual channel distortion, chorus, crybaby wah, tuner, and every once in a while I'll use the flange on my BOSS pedalboard. It blows chunks, but it's a flange and those suck anyways...

      As far as bass goes I pretty much use the same things. Only without the need for a dual channel distortion pedal, single channel works fine for most everything.

      And I don't even need to use a keyboard for those.

      --
      --Forest C. Adcock--
    3. Re:Isn't "Guitar Rig" the exact same thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and dont forget the new Amplitube Live too.
      http://www.amplitube.com/Main.html?prod_ATLive

    4. Re:Isn't "Guitar Rig" the exact same thing? by Moofie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Isn't the point of playing an instrument actually playing it yourself?"

      The point of playing music is to express yourself. Different artists use different media to do that.

      What's the problem?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  26. Re:CockOs by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

    "Good luck on never selling a damn thing. F'en juvenille."

    Yeah, poor Justin, he'll only have his millions of dollars and reputation left to console him. Boo hoo.

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  27. Re: Carrying a Crucifix by JojoLinkyBob · · Score: 1

    You have to admit, you'd probably draw many strange eyes trying to tote this thing on your back from one gig to the next.

    --
    -jc
  28. Re:Cockos? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The technologies he is referring to are the Jesusonic (which albeit is a stupid name, but I was amused by the cross shaped platform.) software effects processor and hardware companion.

    If Cockos decides to sell their products, it'll probably have a name change but there's nothing wrong with stupid working-titles (The Matrix' working title was "Learn to take a joke") I'm pretty interested in powerful a effects software package that at this point is free, and I know a lot of musicians who would be as well.

    So the guy likes to make bad jokes, omgzzss11!1one.

  29. Cockos! by Darth23 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    ... the pornographic Breakfast Cereal!

    I apologize deeply to anyone I might have offended.

    --

    -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

  30. Re:CockOs by metlin · · Score: 1

    You're on crack if you think something won't sell just because it's named badly (intentionally or otherwise).

    What's more likely to happen is that it will get quite popular and just like AOL brought out Nullsoft, Cockos will get bought out and the company will rename the products.

    While names maybe useful in branding, useful and functional stuff need not always have good names - there will be people buying the stuff for what it does, rather than what it's called. Have enough such people and you'd be mainstream - you'd not be laughing at the name simply because it'd have become ubiquitous.

    Back Orifice was such a cheesy name, but when it became popular, people stopped noticing what it was called.

  31. Whatever he is working on... by jstrain · · Score: 3, Funny

    Whatever he is working on, I'm sure it really whips the Lamma's ass...

    1. Re:Whatever he is working on... by Darth23 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Obviously someone who never listened to the WinAmp sample file modded the above message down.

      --

      -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

    2. Re:Whatever he is working on... by Raunch · · Score: 1

      > Whatever he is working on, I'm sure it really whips the Lamma's ass...

      I was just going to say mod parent up, but since I'm in here: Llamma.

      --
      George II -- Spreading Freedom and American values, one bomb at a time.
    3. Re:Whatever he is working on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was just going to say mod parent down, but since I'm in here: llama.

    4. Re:Whatever he is working on... by JessLeah · · Score: 1

      It's spelled "llama", dammit.

    5. Re:Whatever he is working on... by One+Childish+N00b · · Score: 2, Funny

      Everyone's favourite WinAmp-related animal is a Llama. There's no such animal as a Lamma or a Llamma. The former is the name of a small island off the west coast of Hong Kong, however, but it's lack of an ass, whipped or otherwise, means the analogy still doesn't quite fit.

      --
      Dealing with lawyers would be a lot less tedious if they all looked like Casey Novak.
    6. Re:Whatever he is working on... by firellama · · Score: 1

      That's Firellama. First the whipping and now the butchering of the name. Seriously!

    7. Re:Whatever he is working on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Rock over London, Rock on Chicago...

      RIP Wesley.

    8. Re:Whatever he is working on... by Darth23 · · Score: 1

      Yeah well you repeated what I said - but you get a '5' and I get '0' 'TROLL'. Go figure.

      --

      -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

  32. Re:CockOs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who is laughing now: he is, he is filthy rich and loving life.

    you are a loser on slashdot bashing somone who has and will continue to accomplish so much

    at his age he has already made more money, done more, and accomplished more, than you will ever, in your entire life.

  33. Re:In other news... by SmokeHalo · · Score: 0

    Nothing wrong with CuntOS. It's got decent security...there's only one hole, but it's a biggie.

    --
    I'm not good in groups. It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent. - Q
  34. Re:CockOs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's great he made tons of money.

    As far as accomplishments ... I'd say he's more lucky than anything else. WinAmp is nice, but it was more of a right place at the right time thing than any amazing programming ability and foresight.

    I rank his accomplishments at about the same level as a pro athelete or a popular musician. If you want to rank life "accomplishments" on that level, that's great then. Have fun watching the next episode of Cribs. Maybe you'll find some other arrogant people that you might think are wonderful as well.

  35. Re:CockOs by deathazre · · Score: 1

    if it's anything like nullsoft, he'll have to get sued over the name of a product before anyone buys him up.

    (for the uninformed, yes, that's what happened with nullsoft and winamp.)

    --
    Karma: Negative (Mostly affected by dorm trolling)
  36. I've got the Slogan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I don't see someone taking the monstrosity to a jam session.

    Jesusonic - it really breaks the llama's back! (bahahaha....)

  37. This is why he's got lots o money. by teamhasnoi · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Give the software away, but tie the ease of use it to special hardware that he makes.

    Lots of people will run this, and make presets, and do lots of stuff for free for him, while he sells the hardware that makes it usable (without having to hack it together yourself).

    Genius. I think Apple tried something like that before...anyone heard of the iPod?

    1. Re:This is why he's got lots o money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, it's a VIA PC with some pedals and a display. How hard could it be?

    2. Re:This is why he's got lots o money. by ExoticMandibles · · Score: 1
      No, the reason he's got "lots o money" is because he won the AOL jackpot.

      Nullsoft was a tiny company (just Justin Frankel and his dad iirc) selling shareware licenses to Winamp for $10 a pop. Then AOL, who following their IPO had more money than sense, decided they needed to own a media player. So they ambled over and offered to buy Nullsoft for $100m. Well, next thing you know, ol' Justin's a millionaire.

      After that, Lycos said "Hey, I want one too!" and bought the Sonique project. Personally, I have yet to fathom the reason why these companies felt they had to own media players. It's not like they ever leveraged off 'em; they just gave it away for free, and didn't do anything with 'em. Maybe it had something to do with Microsoft announcing Windows Media Player, and keeping-up-with-the-Joneses. Who knows.

      Anyway, let me point out that Steve Wozniak is a smart guy, has oodles of money to throw at new projects, and has yet to found a profitable company after Apple. And Woz has been at it for twenty years.

      I wish Mr. Frankel success, but I suspect his new company will be much more like Cloud 9 than Nullsoft.

  38. Re:CockOs by eddy · · Score: 1

    I guess chicken breasts doesn't sell in the US?

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
  39. great name, what a translation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You may find amusing that cockos sound like cocohs
    and translates to "merdas" or shits (back in english)

    how can there be a better name to describe the page? ;-)

  40. Re:CockOs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cribs is idiotic first of all.

    but the fact remains, he has done something, you have done nothing.

    i

  41. But does it run on... by Bill_Royle · · Score: 1

    CherryOS? Seems to me that every cock is looking for a cherry.

    Wait, I forgot... CherryOS is still under wraps, right?

  42. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, CuntOS can interface with CockOS out of the box.

  43. Jesusonic -- by thatshortkid · · Score: 4, Funny

    It really whips The Savior's ass!

    --
    The IRS is the one organization that you don't want to fuck with. Remember, these are the guys who took down Al Capone.
    1. Re:Jesusonic -- by marcushnk · · Score: 1

      VERY. Nicely. Done. :-)
      *chortle*

      --
      "Consider how lucky you are that life has been good to you so far. Alternatively, if life hasn't been good to you so far
    2. Re:Jesusonic -- by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The llama whipping sample is followed by what is ostensibly a llama's cry. What would follow your tagline, "can this burden not pass from meeeeee!" or maybe "damn you, judas!"?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  44. Re:CockOs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMG!!!

    I'm soooo sorry Mr. Torvalds! I didn't know it was you! I take back everything I just said.

    (Damn this Anonymous Coward business)

  45. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, there are two holes, but one is just a backdoor.

  46. nothing new, nothing novel by paulbd · · Score: 3, Informative

    95%+ of the posters on /., and perhaps even Frankel himself seem entirely unaware that the idea of his jesusonic project is nothing new at all.

    there are several so-called "RT VST hosts" that do the same thing, and several standalone programs. most have been around for several years.

    even on Linux (even!) we have tools like JackRack and EcaMegaPedal, not to mention the world's best live looper (SooperLooper). maybe Frankel's ideas about triggers might represent some slightly novel model for this kind of thing, but the authors of most of the stuff I've mentioned could probably add them in a day or two.

    1. Re:nothing new, nothing novel by neocrono · · Score: 2

      You should realize Jesusonic has its own interpreted (JIT?) language for the effects, which probably has its roots in the "Signal Processing Sudio" DSP plugin for Winamp...which in turn probably stemmed from his experiments with the AVS visualization plugin for Winamp, and its various interesting modules such as "superscope," which plotted lines and points based on audio data coming in from Winamp. You specified exactly HOW using a relatively tiny proprietary language with a handful of math intrinsics, constants and operators. Very cool, and people did some terribly impressive things with it. It has quite a following.

      In terms of flexibility, the only remotely comparable system to the Jesusonic I can think of off the top of my head is Native Instruments Reaktor--but that's a completely different, visual-centric concept. It acts more as a virtual circuitboard, you nest and drag audio/data/trigger connections between small, specialized modules such as "audio XOR" and "1 pole lowpass filter," chaining them to construct in much the same way you would with actual hardware.

      Quoth the official site:
      When you feel like you have exhausted combining the many included effects, and want to come up with something completely ridiculously new and never-done-before, you can make use of your keyboard, and write new effects (or take an existing effect and customize it). Using the integrated code editor, you can actually write simple code that will be compiled into fast machine code on the fly, letting you quickly try out effect ideas and push the realm of possiblity even farther. You can do all of this--without having to stop for any reason. While you edit the code, the effects still run. When you want to try your code out, hit one key and within a small fraction of a second you are hearing results.

      I think it'd be very cool to rapidly prototype DSP effects in this manner, and be able to examine/modify the considerable library that's already there. I think he deserves a little more credit than you're giving him. And did anyone notice the software runs on linux Right Now(TM)?

    2. Re:nothing new, nothing novel by paulbd · · Score: 1

      ever heard of Faust? its a DSP language with a compile-to-C compiler, plus automated front end builders for almost every plugin-ish system you can think of (VST, AudioUnits, JACK, LADSPA, DirectX).

      and long before Faust were the series of languages called System-N, the latest examples of which are Csound and SFront. these are capable of operating at, below or above the level of the stuff in Jesusonic.

      And even Steve Harris, who has written more DSP plugins for Linux than almost anyone else, uses a very simple generation system that takes XML files containing the core DSP code in C, and wraps in everything that code needs to become a LADSPA plugin. It lets Steve (and a few others) focus entirely on the DSP code, and forget the packaging needed to run within a given system.

      Jesusonic might actually be a very good implementation of this kind of idea, but it is absolutely not a novel idea.

      As for Linux support, more or less every serious audio/music app for Linux supports audio I/O via JACK, so that audio can be routed between applications, not just to/from an audio interface. Having ALSA/OSS support on Linux is a great first step, but it already makes Jesusonic less useful to people who make music with Linux than existing tools like JackRack and EcaMegaPedal.

      I am absolutely not knocking Frankel's work on this, I am just irritated by people who think its a cool new idea when it isn't.

    3. Re:nothing new, nothing novel by neocrono · · Score: 1

      No, I was pretty obviously not aware of Faust, nor did I think CSound was for processing as much as it was for generation, NOR did I think it operated on anything remotely resembling a real-time basis.

      I have no reason to be anything but thrilled to be set straight, as I wouldn't purport to know everything there is about audio software by a long shot. Nor did I intend to "irritate" anyone...it seems a terribly odd thing to get irritated by.

      I only replied the way I did because the examples you gave didn't seem directly comparable to Jesusonic at all to me. Cool new idea, it's the same to me.

      OT, where could I learn more about Faust?

    4. Re:nothing new, nothing novel by neocrono · · Score: 1

      NB: "new" in "cool new idea" was supposed to be trikethrough. But Slashdot is stupid and so am I for not previewing.

    5. Re:nothing new, nothing novel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And don't forget ChucK.
      It's text based, and you can edit and modify the code while it's running, there is no compiling!
      It's designed for real time DSP design performance!
      Lots of fun!

    6. Re:nothing new, nothing novel by Faust · · Score: 1

      hi2u2!

  47. Actually, I'd guess it's "Lama". by bennomatic · · Score: 1
    Based on the context--spiritual figures--it's Lama, as in "Dali Lama".

    Jesus did not and does not compete with any south american ungulates with unusually soft and warm fur.

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
    1. Re:Actually, I'd guess it's "Lama". by Alrua · · Score: 1
      Jesus did not and does not compete with any south american ungulates with unusually soft and warm fur.

      Perhaps his donkey did, though?

  48. the boy wonder by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 4, Funny

    Justin Frankel's accomplishments are notable in of themselves, but even more so when you consider that they were all achieved by a boy who's just now turning 13 years old... ...what, he's a grown man? And he still gives his projects names like "CrucFX" and "Assniffer"? That's pretty sad, actually.

    1. Re:the boy wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whats sad is people who lack a sense of humor and think that the definition of "adult" is one who refuses to have one.

    2. Re:the boy wonder by minionman · · Score: 1

      And whats just as sad, the above statement came from someone with the username 'poot_rootbeer'.

    3. Re:the boy wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's sad, "poot rootbeer??", is someone without any real acheivements to his name running around criticizing certain aspects of what the acheivers out there are doing.

    4. Re:the boy wonder by JoshRosenbaum · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should respect a man who spends more time writing good code than one who will come up with a good name and then bust your balls just so you can buy the name. (Because half the time the product behind the name is crap.) Personally, I'd rather use a kickass product with a crappy name than a sucky product with a good name.

  49. As a geek and a musician.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd probably never use that. Hello! Line6.com anyone? It actually already made for what a musician does. And doesn't have the added "must be a geek" factor that can cause other "issues" while playing.

    Sorry, I play to get away from being a geek, not to enhance it.

  50. Max/MSP is far better. by markv242 · · Score: 1
    There's a better piece of software than Jesusonic, and it allows for a more visual display of your patches: Max/MSP by Cycling 75.

    Compare: Jesusonic screenshot.
    Max/MSP screenshot.

    I think you can see which one is much more powerful.

    1. Re:Max/MSP is far better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apples and oranges.

      Jesusonic is for audio effects while msp appears to be a midi synth.

      I was just checking this one out yesterday :http://www.synthedit.com/

      Here are some examples of what you can do with it (not by me btw):
      GUI:
      http://mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/synthedit/
      "Programming" Interface:
      http://mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/synthedit/

      I think you can see which one (compared to msp) is much more powerful :)

  51. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    actually it's got 3 holes, but the third is filled with dangerously sharp "teeth" that sometimes damage CockOS

  52. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  53. Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Speaking out for the first time on life after AOL/Nullsoft

    Correction, speaking out for the third time since leaving AOL.

  54. Perhaps We Need The Karma Police? by icypyr0 · · Score: 0, Troll

    After reading TFA and following a few links, I came to this page: http://www.betanews.com/article/Death_Knell_Sounds _for_Nullsoft_Winamp/1100111204 and encountered the stinging accusation that Frankel may have not been the original inventor of Winamp in a comment. I wonder if this has any truth to it? Here is the comment verbatim:

    "When you read this, please understand, that this is by any means no complain, but expression of my emotions trying to bring some truth to the internet community about events that took place which have been hidden from public. Although, this may read as some sort of conspiracy, this is a true story, how history really happened.

    Let me begin stating that my life for the past 5 years was hell.

    Truth is, Justin didn't invent WinAmp. Actually Justin Frankel is a liar, but he paid me (Dmitry Boldyrev) off to not say anything. The reason why I had to take the gag and not bring the case, which I intended to do at the time, was because I was poisoned (but who did it? hmmmmmm good question, I am still trying to figure that one out) and couldn't deal with court proceedings. For the past five years I was in hawaii trying to deal with the poison, breathing it out of my body. Try day long meditations, Mr Frankel, maybe it will bring you a better understanding of the world surrounding you. Or I guess you're not interested in the truth, the money has blinded you completely. Sure, having few millions in the trust account you probably have a different view on the world.

    I would like to share what I have done with the money that I received from the miniscule settlement that I received.

    1) Started a vegan restaurant in Hawaii, which was rated #1 by PeTA this year

    2) Helped many musicians

    What do you have to show for your millions, Mr Frankel? Yes, we've heard about your love for cars. Is this best you can do? Lets not mention your guitar playing skills, because I dont know how many people are laughing behind your back.

    Before I begin, I'd like to introduce the reader to the fact that I am very sad for this country, and result of its so called elections. It just shows to me that democracy isn't happening here. The result of my history of events that took place in my life, I am starting to question, the very reason why AOL bought WinAmp. My realization led me to believe that AOL needed WinAmp to establish control over media on the internet, music media and radio media in particular. I've met a guy (right hand man of Steve Case @ AOL) Dave Cole?, nice guy actually. Interesting, at his lecture he kept referring to people as software, maybe he needs a break from his work and learn to understand people on more personal level.

    As I was so closely involved, nobody even asked me about Nullsoft sale to AOL. I guess they never considered me anything more than a stupid russian who we can f*** over as much as possible. But personally, I always considered myself a 50% cofounder of Nullsoft (any thoughts on this, Mr Frankel?). So is this the American tactic that we keep hearing about, invite people from other countries, rip off their ideas, enslave them, use their ideas and talant to make money, and then take it off shores to further enslave everyone around? Long live WTO?

    So, now to the story: what TRUELY happened with the whole WinAmp thing.

    I met Justin Frankel at CADE lab at University of Utah in mid 1997 where we both attended engineering school. He was at the time interested in computer graphics, working on Plush 3d gfx engine. Goruraud shading, nothing too fancy. I guess it was quite fast. I was an old-skool music demo coder person. In 1989 I discovered Scream Tracker for PC, which inspired me to write music software, and ever since I've been amazed by computer music, which led me to creation of first gui mp3 player-MacAmp. Beforehand, I wrote many other music-players (for PC and Mac), like MacMik

    1. Re:Perhaps We Need The Karma Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats either a joke or the guy is a nut

      he says he was POISONED so winamp could be stolen from him, wtf?

    2. Re:Perhaps We Need The Karma Police? by BlueCup · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ok... I don't KNOW the truth... but after reading that, I'm inclined to believe that Dmitry, is insane. Maybe he's insane because he was cheated out of something, but I'm inclined to doubt it... more likely he was crazy before... for one thing... day long meditations, for 5 years, to clear out poison? Nobody does day long meditations for one day unless they're already crazy, much less for 5 years... intentional or not, that letter is a troll.

      --
      WANNAWIKI Wannawiki WannaWiki WANNAWIKI!
    3. Re:Perhaps We Need The Karma Police? by icypyr0 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure, I googled this Dmitry guy and he actually has released some solid music software and is apparently fairly well known. He was rumored to be picked up to port WinAmp to the Mac platform in 2001 http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/0101/winamp.s html.

      *Shrug* I don't know..

    4. Re:Perhaps We Need The Karma Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hi this is icypyr0, logged in anonymous because rabid monkeys stole my account

      they also stole my genitalia

      (p.s. actually this isn't icypyr0, just like the poster on betanews isn't really dmitry.. isn't the internet fun? try not to believe everything you read next time)

    5. Re:Perhaps We Need The Karma Police? by BlueCup · · Score: 1

      That causes another problem... sorta... if macamp came first, as according to his post, then a port wasn't necessary... also, the port request, if it came in 2001, would be during his poisoned time... which seems unlikely... I think its likely, as someone else said, that its someone pretending to be him, or, although he may be a fine programmer, he's still crazy, and didn't invent Winamp, though he may still believe he did...

      5 years meditating to remove poison from the body is just a bit too farfeteched for me... as a sidenote, I decided to see if I could verify a couple of the provable claims he made in the letter... the restaurant in Hawaii for example, rated #1 by PETA? doesn't seem to exist... but maybe he created it under a different name, and the 1 was a typo for 5 (there was a restaurant in Hawaii rated 5 by Peta... but the owner had a different name) Yeah... I just can't buy it... not to mention the fact that the original winamp wasn't all that impressive coding wise, and Justin Frankel has certainly proved to be capable of more with his other endeavors... with every person in the spotlight, there will be someone who will try and take it away... I think this is just one of those cases.

      --
      WANNAWIKI Wannawiki WannaWiki WANNAWIKI!
    6. Re:Perhaps We Need The Karma Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dmitry did work at nullsoft initially, before he was kicked out (of a reason I don't know about). I know this guy, and he is real. but I don't consider him a thrustworthy source. That don't mean his story is wrong or made up, but if I know him right it's vastly exaggerated.

    7. Re:Perhaps We Need The Karma Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dmitry = Day long meditations to clear out poison
      Day long meditations to clear out poison = Holistic medicine
      Holistic medicine = Quack "science" for insane people
      Insane people = Dmitry

      Which brings us back to...

  55. nice name! by IshanCaspian · · Score: 1

    I'm coo-coo for cocoks!

    --

    But there is another kind of evil that we must fear most... and that is the indifference of good men.
  56. Cockos = Latin Root by koko775 · · Score: 1

    For sound, duh.

    1. Re:Cockos = Latin Root by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was Cock OS (like in John Bobbit's Cock OS 2.0).

  57. BIG FUCKING DEAL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Software like this has existed for a long, long time...What it's news because he's developing it? Give me a break...

    http://www.kvr-vst.com/ is all you need...

  58. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or in the box, more accurately.

  59. Too late, Justin by melted · · Score: 1

    A company called Line 6 has been offering stadalone guitar effects/amps simulation devices for years now. Recently they came out with the concept of "model packs" whereby you can purchase an additional set of models for $50 or so. This thing is built around a real DSP which means it can run circles around a mid-level PC, despite consuming less power and being a lot smaller.

    They also offer a $129 digital interface with a simplified versions of the same algorithms running entirely on a PC. The interface provides 24 bit AD/DA conversion and a volume knob.

    I just don't see anyone jumping to Cockos Jesus whatever all of a sudden. I hope you don't paying for this with your own money, too.

    1. Re:Too late, Justin by neocrono · · Score: 1

      The interface provides 24 bit AD/DA conversion

      24-bit DA? Really? So it converts the digital signal back to analog and sends it back to the guitar? :P

      The Line 6 Guitar Port is neat, but the "DA" part of it is going to rely on your audio interface. Sample rate is equally important, and even then, numbers don't tell the whole story. 24-bit doesn't necessarily spell quality. The Audigy/Extigy, for example, apparently lie about their 24-bit/96 kHz converters. I don't know if it's true, but I've seen it repeated quite a bit, and it doesn't seem unlikely.

      Again, I don't think you're giving Justin nearly enough credit, because you aren't acknowledging the flexibility of this system. The POD is a bunch of knobs--it sounds GREAT for what it is, but assuming the Jesusonic delivers on its claims (and the software is already there...for free...and runs on linux...), the POD can't approach it in controllability. The Jesusonic is completely programmable. This is nigh apples and oranges.

  60. Lesson #2 in Business... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't name your first 2 products Ass Sniffer and Jew Sonic.

  61. Re:10 points to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GirlyMan?
    FlamingHomo?
    AnalLuvr?

  62. Yup, it has DA as well. by melted · · Score: 1

    You only plug a USB cable into your PC. No other wires involved. Of course only idiots can expect quality AD/DA for $129, but that's beside the point. The point is that Justin is a bit too late to the game to make any serious money on this project.

  63. Re: Carrying a Crucifix by Class+Act+Dynamo · · Score: 1

    That's why you should get a multi-gig harddrive with it!

    --
    My other computer is a Jacquard loom.
  64. awww, he ruined it by Zims+Manson · · Score: 0

    Now Cock OS doesn't sound as original anymore.

  65. NETCRAFT CONFIRMS IT -- WINAMP IS DYING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is official -- Netcraft confirms: *WinAmp is dying One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered WinAmp community when IDC confirmed that WinAmp market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that WinAmp has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. WinAmp is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last [samag.com] in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test. You don't need to be a Kreskin [amazingkreskin.com] to predict WinAmp's future. The hand writing is on the wall: WinAmp faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for WinAmp because WinAmp is dying. Things are looking very bad for WinAmp. As many of us are already aware, WinAmp continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood. WinAmp is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of its core developers. The sudden and unpleasant departures of long time WinAmp developers Jordan Hubbard and Mike Smith only serve to underscore the point more clearly. There can no longer be any doubt: WinAmp is dying. Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers. WinAmp leader Theo states that there are 7000 users of WinAmp. How many users of WinAmp are there? Let's see. The number of WinAmp versus WinAmp posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 WinAmp users.WinAmp posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of WinAmp posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of WinAmp. A recent article put WinAmp at about 80 percent of the WinAmp market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 WinAmp users. This is consistent with the number of WinAmp Usenet posts. Due to the troubles of Walnut Creek, abysmal sales and so on, WinAmp went out of business and was taken over by WinAmpI who sell another troubled OS. Now WinAmpI is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house. All major surveys show that WinAmp has steadily declined in market share. WinAmp is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If WinAmp is to survive at all it will be among OS dilettante dabblers. WinAmp continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, WinAmp is dead. Fact: WinAmp is dying

  66. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  67. The bastard stole my name... by kakos · · Score: 1

    Oh, sure, he changed 'kak' to 'cock', but the pronunciation is the same! That hoe!

    1. Re:The bastard stole my name... by The+Mentalist · · Score: 1

      Looks like that ain't the only thing he stole. Read third post from the bottom: Dmitry Boldyrev

  68. Decent binary file comparison tool? by AbRASiON · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Since we're on the topic of good tight code vs bloatware (well we kind of are)

    Where can I go to request an application be developed, preferably open source
    (bear in mind, I can NOT code to save my life)

    More info below.

    I specifically need a really really good application for finding binary duplicate files.

    I've tried
    "Duplicate files manager" (Clone Killer)
    Has bugs where it gets a fale positive and some files are not 100% binary dulpicates, very bad stuff >:(
    Not a BAD interface but could be better.

    Duplic8 (works well but REALLY bad interface)

    DFL: absoloutely ancient was great in it's time though

    XX??: an assortment of ones I found on google of which they all had flaws I didn't like.

    There's several problems with these kind of programs, normally it's the RESULTS view when the scan is complete.
    You need a good easy to manage listing of the files which were duplicated.
    sort/group by size
    Sort/group by path
    etc etc

    Basically when the program is finished you want results which are virtually in a database form so you can really easily work with the data and kill the files easy.
    Exporting to another application would suck, I want to just sort within the searchin application itself and delete from within it.
    (if you export to .txt / excel or ms access then sure you get nice sortable results, but then you need to Windows explorer browse to the folder the data is in to find / delete it)

    On top of this the SEARCH feature generally takes ages (understandable across 400gb of data and 3 hard disks) but it can be sped up with some simple programming techniques that some programs omit.

    Example flags like
    does / does not matter if filename the same
    date / time stamp
    partial CRc check rather than full (100mb file, it checks the first 1mb, the 50'th mb the 99/100'th mbyte only)
    etc

    Anyone know of any? I'd love an open source one, I generally find OSource software better coded and with more features.

    1. Re:Decent binary file comparison tool? by Zen+Punk · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't this be better as an ask Slashdot peice? Or maybe just post it to an open-source forum that is more geared to answering questions...I hope someone helps you out, but you're likely to be modded offtopic for this(And, well...rightfully so.)

      --
      Sleep is futile.
    2. Re:Decent binary file comparison tool? by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      You're absoloutely right but I've never done an ask slashdot peice before and isn't everything rejected around here?

      (i guessed on the offtopic, I had to give it a shot)

  69. Doesn't matter... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

    Any good hack that gets written for Windows will have a clone available for Linux and other free open source OS's within a month or so.

    --
    My other first post is car post.
  70. On the video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might recognize Christophe Thibault on the video, the author of K-Jofol, Kaillera and other goodies and ex Nullsoft employee, and winamp dev lead for a while. Looks like Justin has taken some talented people along with him :)

  71. That brings the question.... by earthstar · · Score: 1

    Is he gay?

  72. hmmm... by unaesthetic.net · · Score: 1, Funny

    What happens when CockOS has a core dump?

  73. Jesus on IC? (n/t) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  74. Frankel's Methodology & Mania by ChozCunningham · · Score: 1

    Nullsoft, SafeSex , Ass I/O, Waste, Cockos, Jesusonic... These are great names for products, IMHO. 2/3'rds of this page is fill with flamey venom for the names, sprickled with actual on-topic discussion. It's amazing how many dateless, lego-mindstorm-programing nerds are ridiculing the names he picks for things, while complaining about their rights online, the **AA's and corporate "evilness" in general.

    Besides, the Cockos and Nullsoft products that aren't named in some humorous way are pretty much as immemorable as any other computer-ish acronames.

    If you dont want to use or buy his products, simply because of the name, I suspect he really doesn't give a damn. The names are funny, sometimes witty, and just offbeat and so anti-marketing that it at least makes me happy, after 99.99 percent of my time being inundated with slick, cute, over-marketed, sterlized products and services.

    So, to the enlightened masses of /. readerdom, that can't get over the names he picks, thanks a lot for voting with your dollar for all the vanilla corporate American marketers can fill your IV with, and tries to fill mine. /rant

    And Justin, thanks for being a wildly successful punk ass. I, for one welcome our dastardly underminer.

  75. taking advantage of the already-transferred data by nutznboltz · · Score: 1

    Like the pics you can't save when right-click is disabled?

  76. Cockos, - means by narsiman · · Score: 1

    Cockos means a toilet in (south) India !

  77. Re:10 points to... by Eric+S+Raymond · · Score: 1

    Funny thing, I was looking in google for a crack for Tie Fighter, a game I have on floppy
    but never played, when I stumbled upon this:

    http://www.dcee.net/Files/New/

    winamp12.zip 203K The premier Layer 3 MPEG Audio player for Windows 95
    and NT from fREEStyle

    It was fREEStyle?

    --
    Bypass Compulsory Web Registration -- http://bugmenot.com/
  78. Re:10 points to... by Eric+S+Raymond · · Score: 1

    Well what was it mother fucker?

    --
    Bypass Compulsory Web Registration -- http://bugmenot.com/
  79. you obvjously haven't read the article. by alizard · · Score: 1

    his primary project, the "Jesussonic" FX box at the moment runs in Linux / Mac / Windows, and I'm not depressed in the least about this.

  80. Responsible for OpenGL too. by Raunch · · Score: 1

    If I judge it correctly, and I think that I do, Justin seems to have designed OpenGL as well: http://www.livejournal.com/users/garote/57955.html

    --
    George II -- Spreading Freedom and American values, one bomb at a time.