Slashdot Mirror


Meet The Co-Creator of Firefox

Jay Langhurst writes "Learn more about the roots of Firefox and about the 19-year-old who co-created the browser in this article. 'To take an internship at Netscape during the summer of 2001, Ross moved with his mother to a rented apartment near Netscape's offices in Mountain View, Calif. She drove him to work each morning.'"

255 comments

  1. But... by skinfitz · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    Slashdot still doesn't render correctly in FF...

    1. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      It does in Firefox nightly development builds, and it will in Firefox 1.1, which should be out in a couple of months or so.

      Of course Slashdot could get a code cleanup before then...

    2. Re:But... by Malc · · Score: 4, Informative

      Haven't you been paying attention? Go and Google and you will learn that it was fixed in the mainline long ago, and you will also learn why it wasn't rolled in to FireFox 1.0.

      *sigh*

    3. Re:But... by almostmanda · · Score: 5, Informative

      This might be band-aiding the situation, but I haven't had to deal with the /. rendering probs since I downloaded the Slashfix extension.

    4. Re:But... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Luckily, other people whore my fix for me these days, but see my sig for a link to Slashfix. And when 1.1 comes out in a few months, this won't be necessary any more as the underlying issue has been patched ages ago.

    5. Re:But... by Sierpinski · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've had less trouble viewing pages in Firefox than in any other browser I've ever used. Netscape 4.x was a nightmare, Netscape 6 was only slightly better. IE 5 and 6 had their good points, but still had proprietary functions/attributes that made it not universal (and don't even get me started on the security vulnerabilities). Firefox has been, far and wide, the most compatible browser for me, as a programmer and as a web designer.

      At this point, I only test my work in IE because I know some of my users still use it, but that's changing fast.

    6. Re:But... by Asphalt · · Score: 1
      I haven't applied any patches or fixes, and i've never had a problem rendering Slashdot in any version of Firefox.

      What gives?

    7. Re:But... by garcia · · Score: 0, Troll

      Haven't you been paying attention? Go and Google and you will learn that it was fixed in the mainline long ago, and you will also learn why it wasn't rolled in to FireFox 1.0.

      My question for you is why do the Slashbot continually claim that Firefox is so superior when it won't even render their favorite site correctly?

      If Slashdot doesn't render correctly how the hell can they claim that every site will work "just fine"? Remember, general users who need to switch to IE will only give something so many chances... If their favorite site doesn't render correctly under Firefox do you really think that they are going to believe you when you tell them that it is better?

    8. Re:But... by garcia · · Score: 1

      switch FROM IE. Sorry.

    9. Re:But... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      How slow is your PC? I've heard that it's a timing bug, and faster PCs are more affected by it.

    10. Re:But... by batemanm · · Score: 1

      I haven't had any problems on either of my systems; AMD 1500 laptop and an intel 2.8Ghz P4.

    11. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's wrong with it? I don't see a problem.

    12. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Of course Slashdot could get a code cleanup before then...

      Hahahahahaha. Slashdot code cleanup? Slashdot hasn't changed in 4 years.

    13. Re:But... by the+unbeliever · · Score: 4, Informative

      because slashdot spits out garbage HTML that doesn't fit even the most lax of validation checks.

      slashdot's html was written back in 1997ish, and hasn't been updated since.

    14. Re:But... by MrSticks · · Score: 1

      I've got an AMD 1800 and I've never seen any issues either.
      Here is the actual bug report though. It has to do with the left column size not always being correct. I don't think I've ever seen this happen to me though.
      Link

    15. Re:But... by OmniVector · · Score: 2, Insightful

      am i the only one who has absolutely no fucking clue what you people are bitching about, even though i use firefox every day to read slashdot?

      --
      - tristan
    16. Re:But... by Jugalator · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My question for you is why do the Slashbot continually claim that Firefox is so superior when it won't even render their favorite site correctly?

      Because, even with this flaw, it's better than IE (the browser that's usually compared against)? I mean, Firefox isn't perfect, but IE is even less, from what I've seen.

      If Slashdot doesn't render correctly how the hell can they claim that every site will work "just fine"?

      Point me to a post where it has been said that all sites there is render just fine instead of just claiming something you think you've heard.

      If their favorite site doesn't render correctly under Firefox do you really think that they are going to believe you when you tell them that it is better?

      Depends on what they believe matters more, perfect rendering of Slashdot, or other issues like security problems. Also, Slashdot should render correctly in Firefox 1.1.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    17. Re:But... by TehHustler · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hence it is Slashdot's problem, and not Firefox's. People always say "It's up to the coder to create valid code" - so lets see that rather than whining about a browser that sticks to the standards just fine.

      --

      TheHustler
      http://www.elmarko.org/ - Useless bilge
      http://www.asylum-games.co.uk/ - Co-Founder
    18. Re:But... by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      I've *never* had rendering problems with Slashdot. Am I in the minority?

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    19. Re:But... by bunratty · · Score: 5, Insightful
      My question for you is why do the Slashbot continually claim that Firefox is so superior when it won't even render their favorite site correctly?
      Believe me, Internet Explorer has worse bugs than Firefox does. It's just that nearly every web developer tests their site very thoroughly in Internet Explorer, and most will go to great trouble to work around IE's many bugs. That's why sites look better in IE than in Firefox, even though Firefox is inherently superior. As bugs get fixed in Firefox and as more web developers test their sites in Firefox, this situation will improve.
      --
      What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
    20. Re:But... by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

      Tis true, sometimes firefox does not render /. correctly.

      At least on my firefox.

    21. Re:But... by Matt+Perry · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Slashdot still doesn't render correctly in FF...
      That's because slashdot's HTML still doesn't validate. Even though people have fixed the markup it hasn't been incorporated into slashcode, either because no one has submitted patches or no one in charge cares. I'm surprised that the slashdot people haven't gone ahead and incorporated the changes themselves since it seems it would 1) help their street cred to have a site so focused on standards and computing to actually follow standards and 2) help them save bandwidth to use stylesheets more and get rid of the junk markup like font tags.
      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    22. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying that Slashdot, instead of following standards, build it's site specifically for IE.

      Interesting.

    23. Re:But... by stridebird · · Score: 1

      Not entirely true...you have to just help it along a little. +"+" then +"-" fixes the display. It's not ideal, but it works and just becomes a reflex after a while. I learnt that from slashdotters...thanx!

    24. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Point me to a post where it has been said that all sites there is render just fine instead of just claiming something you think you've heard.

      Let's go with several from people who blame broken sites. Broken sites don't refute the parent's claim. People want the sites they surf to work whether they are compliant or not, IE gives them that, Firefox does not.

      1.

      2.

      3.

      4.

      5. This guy doesn't even want IE users to have the ability to see any pages.

    25. Re:But... by RicJohnson · · Score: 0

      What version of code does Slashdot run? I see that they recently updated the SlashCode site Why doesn't CmdrTacoBell use better and newer code?

    26. Re:But... by fresh27 · · Score: 1

      If Firefox renders Slashdot wrong because of problems with Slashdot code, how will 1.1 fix it? Slashdot isn't changing, Firefox is.

      --
      http://ipod.fresh27.net/
    27. Re:But... by Jo+Owen · · Score: 1

      yes

    28. Re:But... by dgmartin98 · · Score: 1

      From my experience, the formatting in a Slashdot page only gets messed up maybe 1 in 10 times. Then I just hit Reload (F5) and it's fine.

      --
      FPGA, Wireless, ASIC, Verilog, VHDL, HW, 10yr exp, Team Lead, Ottawa (More? Email above. slashdotusername=dgmartin98 )
    29. Re:But... by Bodysurf · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Slashdot still doesn't render correctly in FF...

      Slashdot renders just fine for me in FireFox v1.0.

      Perhaps you could give an example of how/where it doesn't render properly for you (you know evidence) rather than just dropping a troll?

    30. Re:But... by Malc · · Score: 1

      To add to this: the rendering bug isn't that bad. I don't think I even notice it anymore I've become so used to it. It's not invasive that it renders the site unreadable. So I think some people just like to whinge and create mountains our of molehills to garner attention.

    31. Re:But... by garcia · · Score: 1

      Hence it is Slashdot's problem, and not Firefox's. People always say "It's up to the coder to create valid code" - so lets see that rather than whining about a browser that sticks to the standards just fine.

      Yes, sites are coded with IE in mind and thus they are likely not standard compliant and they will break other browsers but this isn't about that at all. It's about how the general computer user will see Firefox when they attempt to use it.

      So, the general computer user hears all this Firefox hype and downloads it. Installs it and fires up one of his freshly migrated bookmarks. The page doesn't render correctly.

      You think that they are going to give this another try?

    32. Re:But... by Asgorath · · Score: 1

      Same here to be honest. I don't really see anything "off" on Slashdot and view it with Firefox as well. Okay, I also usually just read it in Thunderbird... bird, fox.. what's the difference. No problems here at least :)

    33. Re:But... by xilet · · Score: 1

      Is it just on Windows, I have been browsed using netscape/mozilla/Konqueor/Firefox and have yet to see problems on /., or do I just not see them as problems? What does not render properly?

    34. Re:But... by CTho9305 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It doesn't matter whether the HTML is garbage - it should render the same way every time you load it. However, there is a class of bugs in the gecko engine called "reflow" bugs, which only show up in certain situations, based on the timing of various events during page load, which sometimes cause the page to render differently.

      This *IS* a bug in Mozilla/Firefox, and it *HAS* been fixed for a long time (since before Firefox 1.0 was released) but the fix was not included in FF1.0 because it broke other things.

      For many reflow bugs, you can construct valid HTML that exposes it just as well as garbage "HTML".

    35. Re:But... by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

      Nope, it happens on linux.

      I will say firefox is being run on a linux box, thrown to my solaris box.

      And is probably not the most recent version of firefox but close.

    36. Re:But... by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      Offtopic... come on moderators, it's a valid point

      Quick fix for those of you not wanting to download plugins:

      Ctrl +
      Ctrl -

      This seems to fix all render bugs by forcing Firefox to re-render the page (it's a zoom change) without waiting for anything from the server (which IIRC is the root cause).

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    37. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...People want the sites they surf to work whether they are compliant or not, IE gives them that, Firefox does not..."

      And IE gives the user a lot more... more security issues than a hound dog has fleas. With the current state of IE, a person would have to be nuts for using it. Each click you make on the WWW using IE runs the risk of catching something new. Why take the risk? Beats me...

    38. Re:But... by the+unbeliever · · Score: 1

      Slashdot is the only site that I experience rendering issues on. Care to share a few examples?

    39. Re:But... by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

      Oops missed 2nd question.

      When reading the comments for an article.

      The comments are pushed all the way to the left, overlapping the the left column(Sections, user info, etc)
      So it is hard to read the first few comments.

    40. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank You! I was thinking the exact same thing. I don't see anything wrong with the slashdot in ff.

    41. Re:But... by xilet · · Score: 1

      Hrmm I do notice a little overlap but not more then a few pixels, guess its just something with my setup. Thanks for answering!

    42. Re:But... by badmammajamma · · Score: 1

      Not gonna happen dude. If Firefox ever does get decent market share, Microsoft will release a new version of IE that actually has useful enhancements in it and it will be game over. It's a war you can't win. At best you can skirmish for a while.

      I wish it were otherwise, but that's just the cold hard realities of the situation.

      --
      Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
    43. Re:But... by Mike_01_01 · · Score: 1

      Nope, I also had no fucking clue. Then, I read the posts following yours, and I still have no fucking clue.

      Perhaps these so called problems are related to the browser config or a Firefox extension?

    44. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me either. Maybe it's operating system related? I'm using Linux.

    45. Re:But... by JaxWeb · · Score: 1

      Here is a screenshot of how it sometimes goes wrong. It happens about 1/6 times for me.

      I took that screenshot just for you three in this thread, so be proud...

      --
      - Jax
    46. Re:But... by admdrew · · Score: 1
      the rendering bug isn't that bad. I don't think I even notice it anymore I've become so used to it. It's not invasive that it renders the site unreadable.

      I'd agree... in fact, I didn't even notice it was a bug the first couple of times it happened to me. A simple refresh (sometimes two at *most*) will fix it. There are plenty of pages out there that have to be refreshed to fix rendering errors stemming from half-loaded code, etc. I joked with a friend of mine that FireFox was fast enough that I could fit in a refresh while his IE was still loading it. Heh.

    47. Re:But... by Asphalt · · Score: 1
      How slow is your PC? I've heard that it's a timing bug, and faster PCs are more affected by it.

      AMD Athlon 64 3400+

      I also run it on two laptops, one as slow as a PIII-850.

      No major rendering problems with Slashdot so far. At least none that I notice. I dunno. *shrug*

    48. Re:But... by Mike_01_01 · · Score: 1

      Wierd, I have not had that happen to me.

      Are you by any chance using any extensions that modify the page source or page rendering in any way?

      Can anyone comment on what specifically causes the problem? (like a broken tag for example)

    49. Re:But... by JaxWeb · · Score: 1

      Happens even without extentions (Although I've just installed a new plugin to try and fix it.

      Read https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21752 7

      It seems to be "reflowing". There is another (much less extream than mine) screenshot, too.

      --
      - Jax
    50. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i see occasional stuff on wikipedia quite a bit.

      note that the same page can render fine sometimes and not others!

      mainly its the first line of a block of text dissapearing behind an image or other callout box.

    51. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IE is a diificult one for MS

      if they LET firefox win then they risk losing one of thier major platform lockin components.

      on the other hand is it really in thier interests to spend development time/money on something they plan to give away free?

      you may not be able to win a war but you can make the war bloody expensive for your opponent.

      if ms wants to win back firefox converts in significant numbers it is going to have to seriously improve IE and give it to more than just winxp users.

      firefox is gainging ground. If ms decides to stop it then it will be an expensive desicion. If ms decide NOT to stop it then it could also turn out to be a very expensive desicion.

    52. Re:But... by kaladorn · · Score: 2, Informative

      Depends what you mean by winning. If the new generation of gecko browsers drive MS into upgrading their security, adding tabbed browsing, and a host of other things that the 'others' now do, then really, the war will be won. Some people think the point is to get rid of M$. The truth is, the point is to get better software out there for everyone. And in that sense, Firefox and the others can make this a reality.

      --
      -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
    53. Re:But... by OmniVector · · Score: 1

      i've never seen this happen. and i use firefox on mac, linux, and windows rather requently. *shrug*

      --
      - tristan
    54. Re:But... by anonymous_wombat · · Score: 1
      It is up to the coder to create valid code, but up to the parser of the code to make their code bulletproof, even for incorrect HTML.

      By this logic, a browser with a buffer overflow problem could say that it is not their fault, but the attackers.

    55. Re:But... by handslikesnakes · · Score: 1

      By that logic, a text editor that uses \a for line breaks could say that it's cat's fault that your computer is beeping like mad and showing everything on one line.

      I mean, cat's code should be bulletproof, right?

    56. Re:But... by handslikesnakes · · Score: 1

      It is a Firefox rendering bug, but one that only appears because of Slashdot's disgusting HTML.

    57. Re:But... by Mgs0008b221 · · Score: 1

      Renders fine with me. Moox 'M3' build. Firefox 1.0

    58. Re:But... by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I suppose that's while they don't have a link to w3c's html validator in the footer, like some other sites do. checking out the Validator does wonders for your mark-up, but its hell on your ego.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    59. Re:But... by the+unbeliever · · Score: 1

      And that's also why they block the validator. Should check it out.

    60. Re:But... by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Oh My 72 errors on the front page! You can block a url but you can't stop people front saving to disk and uploading it as a file to check.

      Actualy 72 is less than I really expected considering how old the base code is they have bits and peices of html generating code spanning 4 or 5 versions of HTML and chunks from add servers and such.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  2. Ain't that sweet... by ravenspear · · Score: 4, Funny

    At least we know he's a real geek.

    1. Re:Ain't that sweet... by spellraiser · · Score: 4, Funny
      Real geek alright:

      And have his appearances in major newspapers posted on his eponymous Web site helped with those California girls at school?

      "They're the ones that aren't impressed at all," he said with a laugh.

      Depressingly familiar ...

      --
      I hear there's rumors on the Slashdots
    2. Re:Ain't that sweet... by BaldGhoti · · Score: 1

      A real geek who knows how to write, too. His blog looks fairly new but still informative.

      --
      [insert witty sig here]
    3. Re:Ain't that sweet... by DrDatabase · · Score: 1, Redundant

      "Depressingly familiar ..."

      People who spent most of their live behind a PC miss out on the social skills their peers develop when they're out hanging with friends and such.

      It's a fact of life.. but he doesn't look like a real nerd. So as long as he doesn't think like a computer everything is not lost :P

    4. Re:Ain't that sweet... by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but if you can't find a hot geek girl at Stanford, then you'll never find one.

    5. Re:Ain't that sweet... by stridebird · · Score: 1

      Er, his blog looks fairly flattened now...he'll be thanking you soon no doubt.

    6. Re:Ain't that sweet... by MaynardJanKeymeulen · · Score: 1

      His blog looks like the site of some obscure censusbureau of some obscure western-hemisphere country to me.

      --
      "The day Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck is the day they make a vacuum cleaner."
    7. Re:Ain't that sweet... by stiffneck · · Score: 1
      "They're the ones that aren't impressed at all," he said with a laugh.

      young girls just don't get - he is (or will be) rich! they should go get 'em girls while you still can!

    8. Re:Ain't that sweet... by stiffneck · · Score: 1

      oops - delete they should

    9. Re:Ain't that sweet... by DrDatabase · · Score: 1

      he is (or will be) rich! they should go get 'em girls while you still can! You just gotta love a man who says things like "kernel panic" when he's talking in his sleep :X

    10. Re:Ain't that sweet... by stanleypane · · Score: 1

      Take a look at his photo. It's makes me think of Boy Meets World meets Screech Powers.

  3. Is it a two-floor apartment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    ' Ross moved with his mother to a rented apartment '

    Is the apartment two-floors, so he can still be in mom's basement?

    1. Re:Is it a two-floor apartment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably not, there are no basements in Florida so he's used to it.

    2. Re:Is it a two-floor apartment? by contagious_d · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah. Here in the deep south people live on their mother's carports. For those of you who have those newfangled garage things, a carport is a large covered patio area with a garage door, a pickup truck, several broken lawnmowers, some cats, and the occasional pale mildewed dork.

      --
      - /home is where the food is.
    3. Re:Is it a two-floor apartment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "The 'carport'? Hey fellas, the 'carport'! Well, ooh la di da, Mr. French Man."

      "Well what do _you_ call it?"

      "A car hole!"

  4. Meet him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I want to hug him, kiss him, have his children....

    1. Re:Meet him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      admit it, you're not even a chick

    2. Re:Meet him? by Chicane-UK · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow - so Michael Jackson does post on Slashdot!

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    3. Re:Meet him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, it matters?

    4. Re:Meet him? by Norgus · · Score: 1
      Actually false alarm, 19 is a bit mature, and if that wasnt enough they posted:

      >>have his children

      Shouldnt MJ recieve children as a gift?

    5. Re:Meet him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially for the having children part, I hope you are female.

      I really, really hope so.

    6. Re:Meet him? by Lil-Bondy · · Score: 1

      hey hey calm down there, if the anoymous coward (mercilessly laughing (not to impose upon cmdrtaco)) is a girl, then let her dream, if its a guy, meh, i dont know, could even be a complete fluke made by a cat crossing the keyboard for all we know

      --
      Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job. - HHGTTG
    7. Re:Meet him? by devnull17 · · Score: 1

      Ummm, to him it probably does.

    8. Re:Meet him? by Dark+Demon · · Score: 1

      Will be after the surgery.

    9. Re:Meet him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It matters if you plan to have anyone's children.

  5. No wanking for me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I want FireFox for Amiga.

    1. Re:No wanking for me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Digging up coffins just to put a copy of FireFox in them is not worth the effort.

    2. Re:No wanking for me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So download the source and compile it already, retard.

    3. Re:No wanking for me! by lintux · · Score: 1

      I heard someone on IRC talking about this. They got something now, the only problem is that the binary is about 300MB. Why? Because it also has a Posix, X, GTK, etc. compatibility layer built-in. Pretty sick, if you ask me. :-)

  6. The press gets it wrong, again... by kmmatthews · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The article claims that the Mozilla Foundation was created _for_ FireFox.

    Gee, I wonder what codebase he used to create Firefox, then?

    --
    feh. stuff.
    1. Re:The press gets it wrong, again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's interesting that he joined Netscape in 2001 to develop FireFox, considering Netscape didn't exist in 2001 as anything more than the brandname of AOL/Timewarner's web-portal. By 2001, the AOL|Sun Alliance had dissolved as planned and there was nothing left of netscape.

      Perhaps what he means is that he went to work at AOL, in AOL's Mountain View offices, which had previously (up until May of 2000) been Netscape's offices.

  7. Uhh...wow? by Minority+Opinion · · Score: 1, Insightful
    How much of a geek genius does it take to do this:

    1) Download Mozilla code
    2) Change the name and turn off several features in the Makefile
    3) ???
    4) Profit!!!

    --
    You may disagree with me, but you have to acknowledge the existance of my highly educated opinion.
    1. Re:Uhh...wow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And where can I download your version oh multi-millionaire?

    2. Re:Uhh...wow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      more of a genius than you...

    3. Re:Uhh...wow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strip down code and rebuild the file - this is serious work.... duh?

    4. Re:Uhh...wow? by MindStalker · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And completly rewrite the XUL that makes the frontend experience.

    5. Re:Uhh...wow? by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Last I checked there is more than just him working on FF. He may have created the fork (and kudos to him) but that's a far cry from the co-author of the entire suite.

      First off, it's LARGELY based off the gecko engine [e.g. Mozilla]. Second, there are other FF active developers.

      This would be like me forking GCC then when 100 developers get a cool release out of my fork I take credit for it.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    6. Re:Uhh...wow? by essreenim · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Uhh, little green man...
      Every time a gifted young OSS contributor comes along there's always someone to knock'em. You can always reckognise the talentless people in these cases. So much of the industry is corrupted by big stocky alpha males that just show up and talk the talk but they're really just full of s***. THey can do f*** all. Evloution will enentually remove them. As a self confessed nerd, I am always delighted to see people like Ross put people like you in your place. In the time it takes for you to realise that you are a fraction of Ross, you will probably be working for him ..

      I imagine you either didn't go to college or just didnt go to a good one OR you have no memory and chose to selectively forget that you are nothing special. You would have left the business in e,barrassement if you had. You can't compete with people like that, and clearly you can't suffer the bruising to your ego.

    7. Re:Uhh...wow? by dapyx · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, no. That should be: 1) Download Mozilla code and modify it a bit
      2) Change the name
      3) Change the name
      4) Change the name
      5) ???
      6) Profit!!!

      --
      I'm sorry, the number you have dialed is an imaginary number. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and dial again.
    8. Re:Uhh...wow? by finkployd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How much of a geek genius does it take to do this

      Slightly more than it takes to whine about it.

      Finkployd

    9. Re:Uhh...wow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I imagine you either didn't go to college or just didnt go to a good one

      What the *hell* does that have to do with anything?! Fucking elitist "You're dumb becuase you didn't go to college" mother fuckers are the worst. As if the only successful people in life are those who sat in a classroom for four or more years of their life and racked up 20 years worth of debt.

      Some people have ambition and talent and intelligence, college or not. Some people have drive and achieve great things that have nothing to do with formal educations. Some people are successful because of self-gained knowledge and experience as opposed to barfing up some BS they memorized from some bullshit class they attended while half drunk.

    10. Re:Uhh...wow? by rudabager · · Score: 1

      Oh thats right firefox isn't downloaded for free. You have to pay a wapping $0.00 for it. Thats where Ross gets his 4) Profit!!!. I dont know how i missed it.

      --
      If I wanted easy I wouldnt be an engineer or a patriot.
    11. Re:Uhh...wow? by essreenim · · Score: 1
      But we cannot deny Firefox was probably destined to be another Opera (start off very fast and efficient and eventually code becomes bloated..) if its goals were not defined so well. Firefox is the only browser I know of that stays true to its foundations of speed and efficiency. That means a big thankyou from me to ALL the Firefox contributors, but especially to the co-creators.

    12. Re:Uhh...wow? by essreenim · · Score: 2, Interesting
      years of their life and racked up 20 years worth of debt.

      Some people are successful because of self-gained knowledge and experience as opposed to barfing up some BS they memorized from some bullshit class they attended while half drunk.

      Hey, I'm on your side. Go easy. I forget sometimes that I come from a country with state funded university. College was cheap for me. Any money I needed, I could work and my parents could make up the rest. College didnt cost that much and thats even with no grant!!. I know its different in the US - lots of rich kids that are a waste of money and are put into jobs, but I think they are mainly in non-technical areas - studying such subjects as post modern nepotism with specialisation in elitism. You have to remember, in a state funded institution you have very talented, non-rich kids who often don't get the chances they desserve because they are competing with these rich kids.. I'm not sure how it is in the U.S. but where I come from there are often people in the industry who dont desserve it and have no qualifications to prove it. They have no talent aside from professional bullshitting.. I not trying to start a flame war. You are annoyed by the same thing that anooys me, if you think about it. I'm sorry I used college as an example - bad move. I KNOw there are allot of very talenten people of ingenuity that dont go to college and forge their own careers. I cant believe you would assume I was talking about them. I am not..

    13. Re:Uhh...wow? by queef_latina · · Score: 0

      Admit it, you've never smelled a pussy before.

      --
      Slashdotters: You are all a bunch of faggots.

      Do you hear me, you repulsive faggots? NO DIGG.

    14. Re:Uhh...wow? by MvD_Moscow · · Score: 1

      Without collage you can't achive shit, unless of course your rich enough to hire your own teachers. There are millions (billions?) with talent and ambitions, thats nothing unique

    15. Re:Uhh...wow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So he was right.

      "I'm so smart that I don't have to prove it to anyone. I just have to sneer and tell everyone how much better I am and people will accept it. I'll be running this company in six months."

    16. Re:Uhh...wow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      This seems like an obvious troll, but anyway...

      As stated on http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/releases/0 .9.3.html (yes, this is for version 0.9.3; couldn't find a smilar comment regarding 1.0 or later):

      " Is Firefox just Mozilla with a couple UI tweaks?

      Firefox is substantially different, featuring a number of exclusive features and countless refinements. Well over 120,000 lines of code have been added or changed in the browser and toolkit CVS directories since the project began."

    17. Re:Uhh...wow? by starwed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This would be like me forking GCC then when 100 developers get a cool release out of my fork I take credit for it.

      No, it would be like you forking GCC then, when 100 developers get a cool release out of your fork, the media writes simplistic articles giving you credit for it. :P

      Blake Ross readily admits that he gets too much credit from the media. Read his comments on this blog post if you want to see his take.

    18. Re:Uhh...wow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're kidding, right? Since when has any Mozilla product been fast? And Opera's base package is a 3.4 megabyte download...I call bullshit.

    19. Re:Uhh...wow? by StevenHenderson · · Score: 2, Funny
      From your sig:

      You may disagree with me, but you have to acknowledge the existance of my highly educated opinion

      Hard to acknowledge your highly educated opinion when you spell "existence" wrong...

    20. Re:Uhh...wow? by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that blake rewrote XUL or anything, was trying to state that firefox is more than just a trimmed down version of mozilla that anybody could have made.

    21. Re:Uhh...wow? by essreenim · · Score: 1
      I started using it when it was called Firebird, and I can honestly say it was the fastest browser I ever used at that time. Opera is great too, and arguably the daddy of them all. I must confess, I haven't used it in a while. I use Konqueror and Firefox at present.

    22. Re:Uhh...wow? by aboynoir · · Score: 1

      Without collage you can't achive shit Ahh, sweet irony. College. achieve

    23. Re:Uhh...wow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when are they worth *smelling*?

    24. Re:Uhh...wow? by stanleypane · · Score: 1

      No offense to anyone, but I don't recall anyone else creating the project to begin with. Creative vision goes along way in corporate America. Coding a project can go awfully wrong if their isn't sound structure to go along with it.

    25. Re:Uhh...wow? by Laebshade · · Score: 1

      Haha... so true. IIRC, It started out as Phoenix ( 0.6). Of course, it sprouted a plugin to randomize the name of Firefox... which I can't seem to find. Someone help me out?

    26. Re:Uhh...wow? by Invalid+Character · · Score: 0

      PWNED indeed.

      --

      --

      Registered .sig quotient : 1337

  8. ...who co-created the browser in this article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    How the hell did he do THAT??

  9. Didn't you read? by gerf · · Score: 1

    And have his appearances in major newspapers posted on his eponymous Web site helped with those California girls at school?

    "They're the ones that aren't impressed at all," he said with a laugh

  10. In Korea by Agret · · Score: 0

    In Korea gettig driven to work by your mum is only for old people.

    --
    Have you metaroderated recently?
    1. Re:In Korea by quigonn · · Score: 1, Funny

      And in Soviet Russia, you drive your mum to work.

      --
      A monkey is doing the real work for me.
  11. Basement by Diabolical · · Score: 1, Redundant

    So refreshing to see he didn't live in his mothers basement....

  12. Strange how often it works out that way by Weaselmancer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Odd isn't it - how many times a flat broke intern turns our entire industry upside-down?

    On another note, I wonder how the IE team feels knowing that an intern who had to share an apartment with his mom and have her drive him to work basically outperformed their entire team.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:Strange how often it works out that way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wonder how the IE team feels knowing that an intern who had to share an apartment with his mom and have her drive him to work basically outperformed their entire team.

      I wonder how the mozilla team feels knowing that an intern who had to share an apartment with his mom and have her drive him to work basically took all the credit for their entire communities work.

    2. Re:Strange how often it works out that way by obender · · Score: 1

      I think the guy who should get most credit is the one the convinced Andressen to go ahead with the new Gecko architecture. Anyone knows his name?

    3. Re:Strange how often it works out that way by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Odd isn't it - how many times a flat broke intern turns our entire industry upside-down?

      How many times is that, exactly? Not to pooh-pooh a good story, but what makes it special is exactly how rarely this really happens.

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    4. Re:Strange how often it works out that way by poulbailey · · Score: 1

      > Anyone knows his name?

      Are you thinking of JWZ?

    5. Re:Strange how often it works out that way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Oh please, quit it with the hero worship. He didn't outperform the Internet Explorer team at all. He took the existing Gecko rendering engine and slapped a lightweight shell on the front.

      Firefox development is hardly without its problems or questionable decisions. They switched from a good looking, professional default theme to an ugly, unfinished one because they couldn't be bothered to check up on the licensing issue (the theme creator had no problems with relicensing it to meet the Firefox needs).

      They broke the extension API multiple times while encouraging people to give it to newbies in its pre-1.0 unstable state, even going so far as to put it on the Mozilla front page in favour of the actual Mozilla suite. Newsflash: telling newbies to uninstall extensions, delete directories, etc just to upgrade is not acceptable.

      They made important UI changes in-between the release candidate and the final 1.0 (do they even know the meaning of "release candidate"?) including such usability cock-ups as changing some keyboard shortcuts from positive actions to destructive ones (when I want to open something in a new tab, I don't expect to get my bookmarks deleted!).

      They left a really annoying bug in 1.0 - the Slashdot bug - that affects their "early adopters" that are responsible for recommending this browser to other people. That's a marketing disaster that only seems to have been mitigated by people spreading FUD that it was a bug in Slashdot's code not Firefox's.

      I like Firefox. I use it as my primary browser. But all along, I have been shocked at how many boneheaded, unprofessional decisions have been made by the lead developers. I haven't observed this incompetence in other browser developers (except for Internet Explorer, of course), and it is not a good sign for the future quality of the Firefox browser. The Mozilla suite developers might not have had their priorities in tune with everybody else, but they didn't screw up anywhere near as often as the Firefox decision makers.

    6. Re:Strange how often it works out that way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Odd isn't it - how many times a flat broke intern turns our entire industry upside-down?

      Or your government... ;O)

    7. Re:Strange how often it works out that way by Bulln-Bulln · · Score: 1

      including such usability cock-ups as changing some keyboard shortcuts from positive actions to destructive ones (when I want to open something in a new tab, I don't expect to get my bookmarks deleted!).

      Huh? Which shortcut are you talking about?

      PS: I agree with the rest of your comment. Luckily the current Trunk nightlies are useable (--> no more slashdot bug).

    8. Re:Strange how often it works out that way by Pope · · Score: 1

      I'd like to add annoyance #1 to the list: the integrated Find searchbar that got snuck in at the last minute. It sucks, I didn't ask for it, and I want it out of my browser.

      It's typical of the Mozilla projects, though, sneaking in radical UI changes at the last minute when the project should be concentrating on bug fixes and stabalizing the code.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    9. Re:Strange how often it works out that way by Drantin · · Score: 1

      er... there is a difference between a mere rumour and Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt...
      The slashdot bug is the one where the link column on the left partly overlaps the stories, right? Truthfully, that bug doesn't really bother me that much, even as an avid reader of slashdot...

      --
      Actio personalis moritur cum persona. (Dead men don't sue)
    10. Re:Strange how often it works out that way by rebelcool · · Score: 1

      Here's my annoyance story: I had a power outage take down my machine. Rebooted, bookmarks were gone. Wiped. Erased completely. The bookmark file had been replaced with the default nearly blank one.

      Searching for it, finds it's a well known bug that if your machine terminates abnormally, there is a chance to lose the bookmarks. There are even extensions out there that back up your bookmarks whenever you close firefox. But really, this is unacceptable in a 1.0 released product. How can I explain to joe public that if his computer shuts down abnormally, he stands a good chance to lose his bookmarks with no recourse to get them back, except next time install some extension that backs them up... and then copy the back up into a deeply embedded profile directory... ugh. Just not good. Unacceptable, really.

      --

      -

    11. Re:Strange how often it works out that way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had that too; Firefox has a tendency to simply crash when it runs out of disk space, and when that happens, the bookmarks etc go with it. The thing is, it could easily clear up some space by emptying the cache when it runs out of disk space. Or just not crash.

    12. Re:Strange how often it works out that way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Huh? Which shortcut are you talking about?

      Open the bookmarks sidebar. Right-click on a link, and hit 't'. In previous versions, it would act the same as right-clicking on a link in a page, and open the bookmark in a new tab. Right before the 1.0 release, they switched it to mean 'cut' instead. Now a user who is used to going down a list of bookmarks, opening a series of them in turn, ends up cutting out a chunk of their bookmarks. You can only paste the last one back in, so if you don't notice on the very first click, you end up losing bookmarks. Because you expected the action that worked in the last version would be safe in the current one. Because you expected the action on one link would work the same as the same action on another link. Because you expected consistency.

    13. Re:Strange how often it works out that way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's typical of the Mozilla projects, though, sneaking in radical UI changes at the last minute when the project should be concentrating on bug fixes and stabalizing the code.

      I don't think it is. I think it's typical of the Firefox project. If it was a problem with Mozilla.org itself, then I wouldn't be so quick to object to the hero worship of the Firefox lead developer (although I'd still think it was pretty silly). But, as far as I can tell, the majority of the problems are specific to Firefox.

    14. Re:Strange how often it works out that way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess you should ask for a refund then.

    15. Re:Strange how often it works out that way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes a massive change that involved making the address bar a tiny bit shorter surely translates into "radical UI change".

      YOU PEOPLE BITCH WAY TOO MUCH.. If you have so much free time for God sake go do something useful.

    16. Re:Strange how often it works out that way by coopaq · · Score: 1
      I wonder how the IE team feels knowing that an intern who had to share an apartment with his mom and have her drive him to work basically outperformed their entire team.

      How many IE developers want to commit suicide due to the red tape and bearacracy that will not let them release their latest works?

      They probably are not aloud to talk about their development efforts much either.

      The IE team seemed very capable.

      The justice dept though is quite capable also.

    17. Re:Strange how often it works out that way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On another note, I wonder how the IE team feels knowing that an intern who had to share an apartment with his mom and have her drive him to work basically outperformed their entire team.


      It's easy to copy technology once it's been established. Just like TCP/IP was revolutionary at the time it was created, but now people implement them for class projects.

      You need more industry experience before making such comments.

    18. Re:Strange how often it works out that way by ralphclark · · Score: 1

      JWZ=Jamie Zawinski. Senior hacker on mosaic/netscape since the very beginning.

      I don't know if Jamie claims sole credit for the Gecko bottom up rewrite, though.

    19. Re:Strange how often it works out that way by MrYotsuya · · Score: 1

      http://www.pikey.me.uk/mozilla/#bb Bookmark Backup is your friend. You can configure it to copy the bookmarks to any directory you want.

    20. Re:Strange how often it works out that way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, yes yes yes.
      Finally someone who likes Firefox like I do and yet knows how boneheaded the developers have been on more than occasion.

  13. And not making a brass ra zoo by ThinkPad760 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just think, If every 19 year old did and internship and produced something of this quality by the time they were 19 and still being driven to work by mum and not colecting royalties. Someday, bloody someday.

    1. Re:And not making a brass ra zoo by rikkards · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      While I was reading this I had U2 Live at Blain Castle in the background and they were doing Sunday Bloody Sunday.
      Completely off topic but it was ironical enough to post

    2. Re:And not making a brass ra zoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also completely off-topic, and now pedantic:

      I think you are confusing "ironical" for the merely (but not uninterestingly) "coincidental".

      To be ironic, "Sunday, Bloody Sunday" would have to incite someone to violence:

      "While I was reading this I had U2 Live at Blain Castle in the background and they were doing Sunday Bloody Sunday. It was at that point in the set where the Catholics and the Protestants started rioting. The carnage would have appalled soccer* fans. Completely off topic but it was ironical enough to post"

      I think it would also be rather ironic if I post this correction but am completely mistaken about it. :-)

      *Or football, depending on where you live.

    3. Re:And not making a brass ra zoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could somebody translate the parent post into English?

    4. Re:And not making a brass ra zoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for clarifying what I meant. Coincidentally (karmically?) Even though mentionioning that my posting was offtopic and setting the No Karma Bonus, I got modded offtopic.
      \Posting Anonymously

  14. That could also be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Shoddy journalism and taking comments out of context.

    Note how its not actually quotes but summed up by the reporter...that's his mistake not Ross's.

  15. Not only that. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 5, Funny
    "On another note, I wonder how the IE team feels knowing that an intern who had to share an apartment with his mom and have her drive him to work basically outperformed their entire team"

    Studies have shown that a million monkeys, banging on a million typewriters, will produce Microsoft-standards-compliant IE releases on an average of once every 6 minutes.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Not only that. by hcdejong · · Score: 2, Funny

      So that's where all my code monkeys went. Microsoft hired them.

    2. Re:Not only that. by Loren_Burlingame · · Score: 2, Funny

      Shut up Weaton

    3. Re:Not only that. by ectoraige · · Score: 1

      They only hired the evil ones.

      --
      Vs lbh pna ernq guvf, ybt bss abj. Tb bhgfvqr. Syl n xvgr.
  16. Real or figment of media's imagination? by Sanity · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I often wonder whether Blake Ross' involvement with FireFox is accurate and fair to other people involved, or whether it is a creation of the media in love with the notion that a 19 year old could go up against Microsoft and win.

    Does anyone have a good understanding of the actual role Ross played here and whether the media reports are being fair to other contributors by focussing on him?

    1. Re:Real or figment of media's imagination? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I reckon he would be the same kid that was on one of the Revenge of the Nerds programs. ...

    2. Re:Real or figment of media's imagination? by ToLu+the+Happy+Furby · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Blake's involvement is definitely being overhyped for the "college kid takes on Bill Gates" aspect, as both he and everyone else at the Mozilla Foundation will be quick to acknowledge. He did play a central role in getting the Firefox project started--but along with Dave Hyatt, who is now a developer for Apple's Safari browser. (Surprised we don't hear as much about Hyatt's role in the story?)

      I think if there's one person who really deserves credit as "the guy behind Firefox," it's Ben Goodger, UI nazi and lead developer from 0.7 onwards. After all, as Firefox is mostly just a UI gloss on the underlying Mozilla code, it's Ben's rigorous adherence to principles of good, clean, simple UI that has made Firefox the breakaway success that the Suite never was.

      But really that just emphasizes how much Firefox depends on the entire Mozilla project, with its thousands of sometime developers and probably a few dozens of real core superstars. That's the real story here, but so far the media has chosen not to cover it.

    3. Re:Real or figment of media's imagination? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was an interview with Blake Ross. Of course they'll play his part up!

    4. Re:Real or figment of media's imagination? by Bulln-Bulln · · Score: 1

      I think if there's one person who really deserves credit as "the guy behind Firefox," it's Ben Goodger, UI nazi and lead developer from 0.7 onwards. After all, as Firefox is mostly just a UI gloss on the underlying Mozilla code, it's Ben's rigorous adherence to principles of good, clean, simple UI that has made Firefox the breakaway success that the Suite never was.

      Yeah. Too bad he doesn't work on Thunderbird. TB really needs cleanig up its GUI.

    5. Re:Real or figment of media's imagination? by ToLu+the+Happy+Furby · · Score: 1

      Sure, but the point is this is far from an isolated incident--indeed, pretty much all of the feature stories on the development of Firefox in the mainstream media have focused on the Blake Ross angle. E.g. there was an article and accompanying interview in the Times of London; and he's got the cover of the upcoming Wired magazine (although apparently the article and interior photos feature Ben Goodger as well). And there have been a couple other examples as well.

      And to be fair it *is* an interesting story. It's just kind of funny because I don't think anyone involved with Mozilla really expected this line of coverage, or thinks it gives much insight into Firefox as a whole.

    6. Re:Real or figment of media's imagination? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truly agree on that. Coders in general are not good at building UI, so having Ben being an UI nazi (love the term) for all Mozilla projects be beneficial.

    7. Re:Real or figment of media's imagination? by shess · · Score: 1

      You mean like a Marc Andresson for the new millenium?

  17. Al Gore's sun by bramez · · Score: 0

    I'll bet Al Gore will claim it's his sun!

  18. Exact quote: by AtariAmarok · · Score: 3, Funny
    "I'll bet Al Gore will claim it's his sun!"

    Here is what he did say: "During my years on the stellar construction advisory board, I was involved in a lot of initiatives. Not only did I create the sun, I created the moon and planets and a pair of really swell comets."

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Exact quote: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the douche bag meant "son".

  19. Co-creator? by northcat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Co-creator? FireFox is derived from the Mozilla code base, with a few changes. The creators of Mozilla are the real creators of FireFox. It's wrong to give any amount of credit for the creation of FireFox to someone who just added some little features and optimized it a bit. The media just likes to make the "story" more interesting by saying a 19 year old "kid" created something used by millions. I can see a new media sweet-heart in the making. Like Linus Torvalds. Yes, he started a good kernel and gave a major kick to Free Software development, but it seems like the media just loves project as if he created every program we use on a Linux distro today and tends to forget the fact there people/groups of people who have done as much as or even more than him.

    1. Re:Co-creator? by oirtemed · · Score: 1

      I would give him credit if I truely knew the extent of his personal involvement. Firefox != Mozilla, and there is enough significant difference to warrant credit. As for Linux, the media may glamorize him a bit but he did START it himself. Sure there were GNU tools and free software before and since, but he made the first linux kernel. The fact that it has all blossomed into this giant thing that it now is, is irrelevant. Ford still made great leaps in automotive manufacturing despite the fact that it is all different now. An inventor or innovator does not need to do the handiwork all himself, the innovation is what counts. And while the concept of Linux is not so innovative, I would argue his call for help from the worldwide pool of coders was and his management of the codebase has been. My two cents.

    2. Re:Co-creator? by genneth · · Score: 1

      To be fair, Linus is still pretty much a dictator over Linux. Every patch goes past him -- after getting past Morton, Kolivas, et al. admittedly, but the code is still all approved by the "Big L". The level of control is actually very much beyond what most project go to -- the only other project off the top of my head that goes for this management style is WINE.

    3. Re:Co-creator? by Jahz · · Score: 1

      I agree with the other posts in response to the parent of this one with the following additions:

      Linus is a figurehead of Linux the same way Gates is a figurehead of Windows. It is also similiar to how George Bush is a figurehead of America. Bush is NOT America, and Gates is NOT (anymore) Windows.

      Basically it is easier for the common person to relate to and understand something that one person is responcible for, and not a large mass.

      In fact, Linus probably deserves to be "Mr. Linux" more than Gates or Bush deserve to be "Mr. Microsoft" and "Mr. America" respectively. With all due respect, the Windows that Gates wrote is long gone. I would bet that Windows XP has less than 1% (if that) of Gates code. Not to mention that the man probably hasnt written anything for Windows in a decade. Why should he?

      And as for Bush...he does far less than the hundreds of congressmen in washington.

      While Linus is still a huge part of the Linux Kernel and still has working code in it. Im not sure, but he probably still contributes as well.

      --
      There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who do not.
    4. Re:Co-creator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, he started a good kernel and gave a major kick to Free Software development, but it seems like the media just loves project as if he created every program we use on a Linux distro today and tends to forget the fact there people/groups of people who have done as much as or even more than him.

      Welcome to the open-source model. Leave your credentials and wallet at the door.

  20. I bet the 10,000 volunteers are ecstatic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    10,000 people create/maintain/do the work/ on firefox and 1 person scoops up the credit for it all ! nice to pad out their resume with

    just like the real corp world, you do the work someone else takes the credit

    1. Re:I bet the 10,000 volunteers are ecstatic by essreenim · · Score: 1
      10,000 people create/maintain/do the work/ on firefox and 1 person scoops up the credit for it all ! nice to pad out their resume with

      Why do people care about personal recognotion THAT much. As long as the contributor know themselves that theay are part of the project, that should be enough. I'm sure Ross himself would be the first to admit that he is not THE Firefox guy..firefox (the browser formerly known as firebird) is an example of collaboration. As a Firefox user, I know that it is the product of hard work from allot of people. Nevertheless we cannot deny its origin ..

    2. Re:I bet the 10,000 volunteers are ecstatic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about help - about credits. lots of names so now you know.

    3. Re:I bet the 10,000 volunteers are ecstatic by queef_latina · · Score: 0
      Why do people care about personal recognotion THAT much.

      Obviously, you've never created anything useful to other people. Let me guess, drop out of state college?

      --
      Slashdotters: You are all a bunch of faggots.

      Do you hear me, you repulsive faggots? NO DIGG.

    4. Re:I bet the 10,000 volunteers are ecstatic by essreenim · · Score: 1

      Gee, it must be essreenim bashing day. Sheesh, my qualifications are none of your business and what proof do I have for you anyway? What proof do you have for me? My /. identity is deliberately anaonymous in nature. Also, even if I had "dropped out..of state.." that would have nothing to do with the sum of my contribution to the open source movement etc. Don't blame me if I have less of an ego than others..

    5. Re:I bet the 10,000 volunteers are ecstatic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      his, not their. "1 person" is singular and English defaults to the masculine.

  21. You know... by keiferb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...this isn't helping the lives-with-his-mother geek stereotype much.

    1. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yah.. and we wonder why some very large enterprises cite "created by kids living in their mothers basement" as reasons to not trust millions of their dollars to OSS .

      I'm a huge OSS fan, but this isnt helping much. Hell i got a big "see told ya so" from the bigots where i work and no amount of trying to explain how and why Firefox is better would get past the "developed by a 15yo in his moms basement" argument, even from top execs. Sad that they are so ignorant.

    2. Re:You know... by Lil-Bondy · · Score: 1

      unfortunatly i am a geek living under his mother, but i have the right to be, im still only 15, thank god. i hope i have more luck with the girls than this guy

      --
      Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job. - HHGTTG
  22. Same kid as in Code Rush by suso · · Score: 1

    Is this the same kid that they interviewed in that documentary called Code Rush that was on PBS a few years ago?

    1. Re:Same kid as in Code Rush by shodson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I believe so, I have that tape, created in 2000, which documents the launching of Netscape's browser to the open source world, and they document a 14-yr old kid (from Atlanta I believe) who moves to Silicon Valley to work for Netscape, and his mom drives him to work. I'll have to watch that tape again, but I believe it is him.

    2. Re:Same kid as in Code Rush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that kid was Stuart Parmenter (pavlov.net)

  23. Hail Hercules! Zero to Hero. by EmperorKagato · · Score: 0, Troll

    Why do I have the feeling Ross is Bill Gates's long lost son? If this was Greek Mythology: Bill would be Zeus and Ross would be Hercules. Some how Bill stuffed his mother 19 and odd so months ago

    --
    ----- You know you have ego issues when you register a domain in your name.
    1. Re:Hail Hercules! Zero to Hero. by essreenim · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Why do I have the feeling Ross is Bill Gates's long lost son? If this was Greek Mythology: Bill would be Zeus and Ross would be Hercules

      I liken him much more to a young Jobbs or the young guy who developed Napster. Gates was a marketing and busineess genius nott technical one as such..

    2. Re:Hail Hercules! Zero to Hero. by trelie · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's "Geek Mythology" not "Greek Mythology".

    3. Re:Hail Hercules! Zero to Hero. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but this is GEEK mythology.

    4. Re:Hail Hercules! Zero to Hero. by EmperorKagato · · Score: 1

      I would expect -1 Offtopic not -1 Troll. Wow, I'm assuming the moderators have taken this as an offense to Ross's Mother. If you find it offensive I apologize for my statement. It is very offtopic and quite inconsiderable for Slashdot.org.

      --
      ----- You know you have ego issues when you register a domain in your name.
  24. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It couldn't help the stereotype more!

  25. Kevin Mitnick by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

    Is there any chance that we can use him as the other example?

    --
    There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
  26. Wired Mag Feb '05 cover - "The Firefox Explosion" by cyranoVR · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wired Magazine prominently features Blake Ross on the cover of their Feb '05 issue for their lead story, "The Firefox Explosion."

    Wired Mag doesn't have the cover online yet, meaning I probably got it from a newstand that put it out early (the 34th St PATH Station newstand in NYC, for those interested).

    The issue also features an "interesting" piece: a fake memo from the future...written to one Bill Gates from newly-hired employee Linus Torvalds - concerning Winux, Microsoft's next-generation OS.

    [Apparently, Bill's "pitch" to Linus in this post-apocalyptic future was "come on Linus...infect the Mothership ;^)" ]

    Anyway, I hate to sound like a pitchman for Wired, but it's worth the look.

  27. Re:Wired Mag Feb '05 cover - "The Firefox Explosio by JFitzsimmons · · Score: 1

    **sigh**
    I always have to wait halfway through the month for the damn magazine to arrive (I never expected a subscrition would bite me in the ass).

    --
    Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master. -Anonymous
  28. Hope he has a great career by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He has worked hard and it has paid off for him. I hope he can continue to grow in his career and keep up the good work.

    Congrats.

  29. HAMMER REVOLUTION --; by clubhouse · · Score: 0, Troll

    firefox is PROHAMMER
    --;
    www.HammerRevolution.com

  30. standing on ye shoulders of giants by sjf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "If I have seen further it is by standing on ye shoulders of Giants." --Newton to Hooke, 5 Feb. 1676;

    'Nuff said really.

    1. Re:standing on ye shoulders of giants by ScouseMouse · · Score: 1

      You do realise that quote is usually taken out of context.

      It wasnt Newton praising his contemporaries so much as Newton insulting his chief rival of the time, Leibniz, who was a very short man.

    2. Re:standing on ye shoulders of giants by ScouseMouse · · Score: 1

      My mistake, it was referring to Robert Hook who was not only small, but hunchbacked as well.

      FYI, try http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/science/testtubesandta ntrums.shtml for more information.

      Its realplayer however.

  31. Re:Wired Mag Feb '05 cover - "The Firefox Explosio by digitalgimpus · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Wired cover is available here:

    Wired.com

    It's posted, just not linked up.

    Per Asa Dotzler's blog

  32. Mirror of Blake's Site by RicJohnson · · Score: 0

    I know that there is an auto-backup of the website for the original story, but it seems that Blake's personal site is down too.
    I see that he is running WordPress - there is a note how to avoid the Slashdot effect for WordPress but maybe he did not activate the plug-ins.

  33. Testimonial by CortoMaltese · · Score: 1

    I just installed the Slashfix mentioned in parent, and the rendering problem is no more. Band-aid or not, it works. (Thanks!)

    1. Re:Testimonial by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 1
      You shouldn't have to patch your browser to fix a broken web page! Should we need a patch for each and every web site? NO! If the web sites follow the standards, and the browsers follow the standards, then there's no need for any patches.

      I've heard of web sites using patches to get around browser defects, but patching a browser to get around ONE web site's defects? That's crazy!

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
  34. Something new by qray · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Firefox is nice, but it's yet another browser. That's one thing that shocked me. Netscape brought the browser to the masses but they never really moved passed it.

    For quite sometime people's needs have grown beyond the browser. Java Applet, and ActiveX have been bolted on, but what is needed is a more seamless integration that provides a more traditional application feel.

    It's unfortunately that we're still stuck using a "browser" when what we need is something more dynamic and powerfull.

    Firefox is yet another browser. Definitely better than many of the current crop. But it would be nice to see something truly innovative.

    --
    I forgot my sig line

    1. Re:Something new by lordsilence · · Score: 1

      Yet another browser?
      You mean yet another browser which isn't bloated with fancy li'l popups and ad-friendly functions?

      A browser which made tabbed browsing mainstream and is gaining market share very fast.

      Firefox is doing exactly what browsers are supposed to do, browse websites. I certainly dont want much innovation right now among browsers. I just want my browser to do what it's supposed to do: "Browse websites". Which is exactly what firefox is doing.

    2. Re:Something new by qray · · Score: 1

      Tab browsing was a nice new feature, but it was available a good bit before Firefox.

      A very useful feature, one that keeps me using Firefox and Mozilla.

      You may be satisified to view static and semi dynamic content but the future is going to demand more dynamic and responsive behavior from web sites. Whoever achieves this with something that's not overly combersome for users and developers will see a lot of success.

      I constantly get hit with request that customers want my web applications to look and behave more like fat client applications. I can't do that with the current technology.

      --
      I forgot my sig line

    3. Re:Something new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a hostile environment like the WWW, you have to ask yourself are features like ActiveX a wise thing to have? From a security stand point, obviously not. And from WWW stand point, no again. ActiveX is a proprietary thing where only paying members of a private club share the experience.

      The WWW is built on open standards... lets keep it that way. Your need for more "dynamic and powerful" things supplied by a private company is not good for everyone on the WWW.

    4. Re:Something new by wikinerd · · Score: 1

      Check Konqueror. It is an integrated file manager, file viewer and Web/FTP browser for KDE. It's small, fast and full of features.

    5. Re:Something new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually Firefox/Mozilla is also a fairly interesting development platform for rich client applications (thanks to XUL an XML UI markup language), which M$ is currently trying to rip off for the next version of windows (a la XAML -at which point I'm sure they'll claim they came up with the idea), so in that way its actually quite innovative beneath the hood.

      I keep waiting for some of the major linux vendors to push XUL as a development platform and beat M$ to the punch but it looks like everybody may be missing the boat..

    6. Re:Something new by CheeseTroll · · Score: 1

      What we really need is tighter integration with the OS. Wouldn't it be cool to be able to install/upgrade software from a remote site simply by clicking on a link?

      --
      A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
    7. Re:Something new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that is the only thing keeping you on Firfox and mozilla (Proven to be far less stable and more susseptable to buffer overruns that IE is currently and with FF's market share aining, will soo be the new platform of choice for malware) you might be interested to know that there are IE shells that provide tabbed browsing, such as "Crazy Browser" and others.

    8. Re:Something new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be difficult for Moz and Firefox to be a platform of choice for malware. That thing call ActiveX is missing which makes 99% of malware happen.

    9. Re:Something new by Stealth+Potato · · Score: 1
      ...Wait. Is this sarcasm? I really can't tell. ;-)

      OS integration is one of the problems with IE; sure, there's the opportunity for many convenient features, but the way they implemented it (viz: poorly) created a lot of security holes that were later exploited by malware writers.

      You were being sarcastic, right?

    10. Re:Something new by LeftOfCentre · · Score: 1

      Visual Studio "Whidbey" / .NET framework 2.0 fully support this. I've seen some demos and it's pretty cool (works seamlessly for both new installs and upgrades -- and you can automatically have it check for new versions etc). The developer can also specify that the software should be downloaded every time it's launched as opposed to launched locally if available (useful sometimes for intranets etc).

    11. Re:Something new by CheeseTroll · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, but not a harsh, demeaning sarcasm (unless the original poster really presses his/her point!). More like snarkiness. What's the emoticon that conveys snarkiness?

      --
      A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
    12. Re:Something new by CheeseTroll · · Score: 1

      Well, that's nifty and all, but why does it have to be part of the web browser? Our .NET app checks at launch for new components to replace old/missing ones. Heck, at a previous employer, my coworkers developed a Delphi app that checked for a newer version of itself at launch time, and installed it if necessary. It was quite simple for them to put this together, actually.

      --
      A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
  35. Majority now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In order to get more marketshare we need to get more attention.

    Someone please implement MajorityNow:

    Surfs while your computer is idle to increase the browser usage stats for Firefox.

    I know it was only a joke, but it might help making a difference. I 'd leave it running 24/7 on my company machine.

    1. Re:Majority now! by pretentiousPPC · · Score: 1

      Alright who is working on MgroeningFortune 6.6?
      I simply must have this.

      --
      Artist will always make art.
  36. Internet Explorer... by logic+hack · · Score: 0

    Bizzaro Internet Explorer that is.

  37. Amiga Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Junis has it running on the Commodore-64. He says the Amiga port should be available shortly. More updates to follow.

  38. Re:Wired Mag Feb '05 cover - "The Firefox Explosio by double-oh+three · · Score: 1

    Odd, I have a subscription and I got it on Saturday. Maybe it's because of location? (I'm in DC)

    --
    "For years, I struggled with reality... but I'm happy to say I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
  39. Topics like this make me depressed..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What was I doing when I was 10? Learning to ride my bike.

    14? riding my bike.

    19? Discovered Slashdot

    present day: Have not been outside since. no bike riding. Still reading slashdot.

  40. Interesting Statement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    From the article:

    "...And have his appearances in major newspapers posted on his eponymous Web site helped with those California girls at school?

    "They're the ones that aren't impressed at all," he said with a laugh...."

    Yeah, the chicks aren't impressed. But soon as the dude starts rolling in some cash and driving an expensive car, suddenly, they will be interested.
    1. Re:Interesting Statement by renata.org · · Score: 1

      You both certainly met the wrong chicks.

  41. A Warning by RodRandom · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hope this kid takes a warning from Chairman Bill and passes up the opportunity to pose for kittenish pix in teen mags.

  42. Promotes Enthusiasm For That Age Group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whether he made significant contributions or not I think it's okay to let the media run with it. It's no secret that Computer Science and many other things IT are waning in interest with his age group. They're cynical for many reasons -- corporate monoliths, off-shoring, soft market conditions, rapid change, etc. It's hard to hang your hat in this industry because it's difficult to see the future. Especially if you're thinking about spending $100,000 on an education.

    So why does it hurt to be enthusiastic about his participation? Did he contribute? Yes. Is it successful? Wildly. Should more kids his age try it. Absolutely!

    C'mon folks, pay it forward.

  43. In australia by Hosting+Geek · · Score: 2, Funny

    You and your mum don't even work.

    --
    For FREE NO ADS! 1GB/20GB PHP MySQL With a Control Panel Hosting
  44. Cool & Hot by renata.org · · Score: 1

    There's nothing cooler on the world than being front cover of Wired magazine, specially when it's for being co-author of the best browser around. That makes him hot enough for me. Yummy.

  45. Re:Wired Mag Feb '05 cover - "The Firefox Explosio by the+pickle · · Score: 1

    Holy crap, put a lightsaber in his hand and he looks like Anakin.

    He probably acts better than Hayden Christensen, too, although I'll wager he'd have a hard time (no pun intended) keeping it professional whilst making out with every geek's favourite fantasy, Natalie Portman.

    p

  46. Real heros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the real heros can be found under http://www.mozilla.org/credits/

  47. Re:Wired Mag Feb '05 cover - "The Firefox Explosio by TekMonkey · · Score: 1

    I've just recieved my copy today. It seems like there have been a lot of articles about him just being released right about now. This can't be just a coincidence, can it?

  48. Standards Exist for a Reason by Stealth+Potato · · Score: 1

    Bulletproof, even for invalid HTML? There is such a thing as stretching the standards, but how can the browser be expected to compensate for flagrant user error? You can only bend over backwards so far in an attempt to provide backwards compatibility. If I'm a non-compliant web page writer, how far should I reasonably expect the platform for which I am writing HTML to "do what I meant, not what I said"?

    Bottom line: the standards are there for a reason; namely, that a web page written with standards-compliant HTML will render correctly in a standards-compliant browser. Insisting that the browser also render non-compliant code correctly defeats the entire purpose of having standards in the first place; it's just unreasonable.

  49. Re:Wired Mag Feb '05 cover - "The Firefox Explosio by JFitzsimmons · · Score: 1

    I'm in Canada, that likely has something to do with it.

    --
    Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master. -Anonymous
  50. Re:Wired Mag Feb '05 cover - "The Firefox Explosio by yodha · · Score: 1

    Blake Ross has the Wired cover on his blog.

  51. Teen Is Co-Creator of Firefox Browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    South Florida teen is co-creator of popular Firefox Web browser
    JOHN PAIN, AP Business Writer
    Sunday, January 23, 2005

    (01-23) 11:21 PST KEY BISCAYNE, Fla. (AP) --

    By age 10, Blake Ross was designing Web pages on America Online. By 14, after mastering complex programming languages such as C++, he was fixing bugs in Netscape's Web browser from home, a hobby that landed him a job offer.

    "What, at the local store or something?" David Ross remembered thinking when his son told him.

    No, at Netscape Communications Corp.

    Ross, now 19, a sophomore computer science major at Stanford University, has an even more impressive resume than most of his peers. Before graduating high school, he helped develop Firefox.

    Colleagues who worked with Ross only online were surprised when they met him to find "a scrawny 15-year-old kid," recalled Chris Hofmann, engineering director at the Mozilla Foundation.

    To take an internship at Netscape during the summer of 2001, Ross moved with his mother to a rented apartment near Netscape's offices in Mountain View, Calif. She drove him to work each morning.

    He continued working on the browser on contract after returning to Florida to attend Gulliver Preparatory School. He breezed through computer classes, finishing projects in a day that took others two weeks, said Dean Morell, a former teacher and chairman of the school's computer science department.

    Ross soon took on a much more demanding project.

    America Online Inc., which bought Netscape in 1999, was trying to resurrect the once-mighty Netscape browser. AOL added features, but they bogged down the software and reduced performance, Ross said in recent interviews by e-mail and at his parents' condo in Key Biscayne, a Miami suburb.

    At 17, Ross and another Netscape programmer, David Hyatt, started a side project that became Firefox. They wanted to strip down Netscape and the Mozilla suite on which it is based. By reducing the software to its browsing basics, they figured it would run more efficiently.

    Ross and Hyatt created an early version of the browser. Because the project was open source, thousands of volunteers could examine the programming code and suggest ways to improve performance and fix bugs.

    "I have fond memories of long nights spent at Netscape just poring over all the feedback people submitted about our programs," Ross said.

    Hofmann, the Mozilla engineering director, said Ross dealt with the pressures of Silicon Valley quite well for his age.

    "I don't think that he was intimidated or awe-struck at all," he said. "With open-source projects you rise to a level based on your skills. It is really a meritocracy. Anyone who has the skills rises quickly and Blake had all those skills."

    AOL ultimately spun off the project and created the not-for-profit Mozilla Foundation to develop Firefox and related software.

    Hyatt left to design Apple Computer Inc.'s Safari Web browser, but Ross stayed and helped fix Firefox bugs from college.

    Firefox was officially released Nov. 9. It was used by 4.6 percent of Web surfers in early January, and that number could reach 10 percent by mid-2005, according to WebSideStory, which tracks browser use. Microsoft's Internet Explorer has dropped to 90.6 percent this month from 95.5 percent in June.

    Security experts like Firefox, saying it isn't as vulnerable as Internet Explorer to viruses, spyware and other malicious programs.

    Ross has assisted with marketing, helping to place an ad in The New York Times paid for by thousands of Firefox users.

    Ross will work with a team on Firefox version 2.0. He also gets calls from venture capitalists and has a startup with Joe Hewitt, another veteran of Netscape and Firefox. He said he can't talk about their work, but he's also interested in writing movies or children's fiction.

    The do