Slashdot Mirror


Family Guy Video Game in the Works

antifoidulus writes "According to Businesswire there is a Family Guy video game in the works, set to hit the street sometime next year. The game is being developed by Take-Two Interactive. The press releases contains only a few scant details, but the game will be a 3rd person action game that puts you in control of various members of the once cancelled animated family." From the article: "The massive licensing and merchandising program on tap will coincide with the new series launch for Family Guy on May 1st, and is expected to be one of the company's largest product blitzes to date."

274 comments

  1. Obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    the object of the game will be to end the life of the wife, with the knife!

    1. Re:Obviously... by `Sean · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up! Obviously the original moderator has never seen the series. ;)

    2. Re:Obviously... by mzwaterski · · Score: 1
      "the life of the wife is ended by the knife"

      -Stewie

    3. Re:Obviously... by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 1

      Hehheh...Best My Fair Lady parody, ever.

  2. Good luck! by mzwaterski · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Good luck and please make it so that it doesn't suck like the Simpson's video games have!

    1. Re:Good luck! by UberOogie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True for the most part, but Simpsons: Hit and Run was outstanding.

      --
      "Enough of this wretched, whining monkey life." -- Marcus Aurelius, _Meditations_, Book 9, 37
    2. Re:Good luck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For about 10 minutes...

    3. Re:Good luck! by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Or that unholy abortion that was "Futurama"

    4. Re:Good luck! by Hobadee · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey now! I'm a fan of the classic Simpsons arcade game! You know, the one with up to 4 players that wasted an incredible amount of quarters?

      --
      ...Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you would not have been informed.
    5. Re:Good luck! by stupidfoo · · Score: 1

      Yet another reason to go and download MAME (and the game rom, if you own the original board :P )

    6. Re:Good luck! by uhlume · · Score: 1

      Gah, they need to hire the team responsible for Conker's Bad Fur Day away from Rare to work on this. If they couldn't create a Family Guy game worthy of the franchise, no one could.

      --
      SIERRA TANGO FOXTROT UNIFORM
    7. Re:Good luck! by mzwaterski · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected, there was one good Simpsons game, and it is the one that you referred to!!

    8. Re:Good luck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also hope it doesn't suck like that other Fox cartoon . . . what's it called . . . oh yeah, Family Guy.

    9. Re:Good luck! by Drakonite · · Score: 1

      They've really gone down hill since Conker's though. I'd much rather see the game made by a team that still knows what they are doing ;)

      --
      Shoot Pixels, Not People!
    10. Re:Good luck! by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Barts Nightmare for the SNES/genesis was also a good game.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    11. Re:Good luck! by MBraynard · · Score: 0

      They had two awesome games - the GTA style game and the Crazy taxi style game. Both were good.

    12. Re:Good luck! by Joe123456 · · Score: 1

      Simpsons pinball party was also good and has the deepest rule set ever

    13. Re:Good luck! by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm a fan of the classic Simpsons arcade game! You know, the one with up to 4 players that wasted an incredible amount of quarters?

      That was the one that was licensed by Konami, and was basically the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles arcade game with new graphics. And it was killer.

      Unfortunately all the other Simpsons games of the era were licensed by Ack! Lame! (say it out loud), and sucked eggs on toast. (As did most games from that publisher, and most console games written by people with American names during that era.)

      I was once jealous that a friend of mine had played all the way through to the end of the NES game "Bart vs. the Space Mutants" and I had never gotten past level three. Now, I just feel sorry for him.

    14. Re:Good luck! by Dizzle · · Score: 1

      Right on par with eye gouging and an acid bath. Seriously, the game was THAT fun.

      --
      -Dizzle
      "I most likely AM so interested in myself."
    15. Re:Good luck! by randallschleufer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      PLEASE for Gods sake, don't make this game 3D. I know it will be 3D, and the BEST we can hope for will be cell-shading.

      That alone is just a shame. Nothing destroys the look of a 2D character like trying to force them into a 3D world. 2D characters have their own unwritten physics, whereas 3D is to stiff.

      Look at the old cartoons, where they used a lot of squash and stretch for motion (2D). We don't see that anymore, because of this 3D crap- someone needs to write a solid squash and stretch 3D engine.

    16. Re:Good luck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmmm 3D lois...

    17. Re:Good luck! by notthe9 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hello, the old Konami arcade game?

    18. Re:Good luck! by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Amen to that. Remember how hideous "Futurama" looked...

    19. Re:Good luck! by qoa · · Score: 1

      Bart's Nightmare on SNES was great. The original NES game was a blast back in the day as well.

      --
      Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
  3. Hmm by MrDoh! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ok, who told the Studio execs that there's other ways to make money than just produce a cartoon show?
    Guess it was downhill from the first DVD, see how long it takes for the Stewey branded Diapers.

    --
    Waiting for an amusing sig.
    1. Re:Hmm by JohnnyKlunk · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've got a 6 month old. If they had Stewey branded Diapers that would be all she'd wear.
      Stewey branded diapers? That'd be so cool I'd wear em !

    2. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This seems to be the closest: "Infant/Toddler t-shirts and onesies" (from the article)

    3. Re:Hmm by oiper · · Score: 1

      "Oh that's it. I'm going to Nam!"

      --
      What do I have to do to get a sig around here?! www.bearscanfly.org
    4. Re:Hmm by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      What if they caused your infant to try to kill her mother?

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    5. Re:Hmm by XMyth · · Score: 1

      Apparently you don't understand his logic. But, I'll explain it to you. Yes that would be cool as well. Cooler even than the diapers.

    6. Re:Hmm by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 1

      Guess it was downhill from the first DVD, see how long it takes for the Stewey branded Diapers.

      Stewie was the model for CK brand diapers... so he probably has a non-compete clause in the contract.

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    7. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Stewey branded diapers? That'd be so cool I'd wear em !

      I think that that Depends.

    8. Re:Hmm by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      see how long it takes for the Stewey branded Diapers.

      From your mouth to God's ear.

      If they did, I just might have to go out and make a baby just so I'd have someone to buy Stewie diapers for.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  4. This could go either way... by wolrahnaes · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It could be great like Simpsons Hit and Run, or lame like the Futurama game...

    Here's to hoping it is good...

    --
    I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    1. Re:This could go either way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      "This could go either way"

      It could be shitty or shittier?

    2. Re:This could go either way... by athakur999 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm leaning towards lame myself. The Simpsons has a very rich background with tons of locations and characters that the Hit and Run game could draw on to make a neat 3rd person game.

      Family Guy doesn't really have all that much to draw on. I'm thinking it's gonna be more "a 3rd person game with Family Guy characters" rather than a "Family Guy game".

      Never know though. Hit and Run was a good game but the ones before it weren't exactly stellar.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    3. Re:This could go either way... by bsharitt · · Score: 1

      But you have to remember how many crappy Simpsons games came out before they got it right.

    4. Re:This could go either way... by eln · · Score: 1

      Simpsons Hit and Run was an outstanding Simpsons game, but not really an outstanding game. It got very repetitive, and in my opinion has little replay value, but it was far better than any other Simpsons game.

    5. Re:This could go either way... by Rei · · Score: 3, Funny

      If they don't do the "Remember that time when..." scenes, it's not family guy. :)

      --
      Freeze Ray. Tell your friends.
    6. Re:This could go either way... by Momoru · · Score: 1

      Or be the BEST GAME EVER, like Bart Simpson Versus the Space Mutants

    7. Re:This could go either way... by byolinux · · Score: 1

      Re: your sig.

      2.4mb storage? Where do I sign up? ;)

    8. Re:This could go either way... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      it doesn't really need that much to draw from.

      GAMEPLAY is the key, not the scenery. scenery can be created.

      futurama game had 'good' scenery(in the sense of futurama world) but sucked in gameplay.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    9. Re:This could go either way... by Impotent_Emperor · · Score: 3, Funny

      Boss Battle: Peter versus Giant Chicken.

      That'll teach that chicken not to hand out bad coupons!

    10. Re:This could go either way... by Shadarr · · Score: 1

      Obviously they should copy the Hit&Run formula, because it worked. That being, use an existing engine and copy the gameplay from a successful game. Get the real writers and voice actors to create the content. Half the fun in Hit&Run was driving around, smashing into things and listening to the characters make excuses or berate you for your bad driving.

    11. Re:This could go either way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The arcade beat-em-up and Simpsons Road Rage were good games. Not very inventive, but still good. It's not like Hit & Run is the only good Simpsons game ever.

      I'd still rather play Road Rage than any version of Crazy Taxi, because of the Simpsons universe.

    12. Re:This could go either way... by demi · · Score: 1

      That must be why I was so bad at it. I don't suck--it was the game! Oh wait, maybe that means I suck more...

      --
      demi
    13. Re:This could go either way... by DrSkwid · · Score: 1
      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    14. Re:This could go either way... by qoa · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Chris vs the monkey. Hopefully Quagmire is in it.

      --
      Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
  5. A Stewie game. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Madden Football-Head 2005"

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:A Stewie game. by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      And don't forget the tagline for the game...

      Where Victory is YOURS!

  6. FCC? by t_allardyce · · Score: 1, Funny

    The US version will have all nudity heavily pixelated in accordance with strict republican censorship standards.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    1. Re:FCC? by The+Grey+Clone · · Score: 0

      The FCC doesn't regulate videogames.

    2. Re:FCC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those broadcast standards have been in place since the beginning, it's not a single-party-only thing, nor is it a recent addition.

    3. Re:FCC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The FCC was established under Democrat President Franklin Roosevelt.

    4. Re:FCC? by t_allardyce · · Score: 1, Interesting

      About a year ago if i had said the FCC would be censoring cartoon butts you would have laughed and said "the FCC doesn't do that", next year the FCC will regulating video games and the year after that they will be regulating what you say in public..

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    5. Re:FCC? by eln · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The broadcast standards are againt indecency, which is defined as whatever society as a whole feels is indecent. So, the broadcast standards change over time as society changes. It's groups on the religious right that are behind the current trend to push the standards to almost farcical proportions.

      Now, you could say that religious fanatacism is to blame, and not the Republican party, but unfortunately it seems the Republican party has been overrun with religious fanaticism over the past 10 years.

    6. Re:FCC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The FCC didn't censor anything. Fox made a decision to change that by themselves. Granted, they said it was to forego any possible wrath from the FFC, but I'd put money on it that some Fox exec just is a little angry because they had to bring back another good show that they had canceled.

    7. Re:FCC? by mzwaterski · · Score: 1
      Do you even know what you are talking about? FCC stands for Federal Communications Commission. Until video games start being broadcast via "interstate and international ... radio, television, wire, satellite and cable" broadcasts I don't really see the FCC saying anything about them.

      Quotes from http://www.fcc.gov/aboutus.html

    8. Re:FCC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Well, what about the liberals who are ALREADY regulating what you can say in public? If i say that men are better than women at ANYTHING, it's hate speech. Or one race is better at something than another... Let us not forget who is behind the whole politcally correct speech movement... cause it damn sure isn't the FCC... it's liberals like you who think it's better to censor ideas and thoughts than it is to censor television.

    9. Re:FCC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The FCC was established under Democrat President Franklin Roosevelt.

      Your point being?

    10. Re:FCC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The statue was originally a gift from France.

    11. Re:FCC? by wwest4 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      So are statist Democrats... look at Joe Lieberman's voting record re: censorship. Al Gore may have invented the Internet, but he also backed the friggin' V Chip.

    12. Re:FCC? by Bluetick · · Score: 1

      How delightfully irrelevant!

    13. Re:FCC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait until you try to download game patches over your cable broadband connection, and the FCC thugs throw you in prison and slap you with a $10,000 fine.

    14. Re:FCC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The FCC doesn't fine the viewer (or in this case, downloader) they fine the distributer. Try laying off the troll, please.

    15. Re:FCC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and the standards have been getting more and more relaxed ever since they were imposed by a Democrat.

      Oops, you probably didnt want to hear that.

    16. Re:FCC? by VoiceOfRaisin · · Score: 1

      lieberman is a right wing asshole. why do you think bush was kissing him.

    17. Re:FCC? by eln · · Score: 1

      Yes, and community standards have changed since the 1930s. Relaxing standards is good. Going back in time and making standards stricter is not good. This, among other places, is where my views and the views of the religious right differ.

    18. Re:FCC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His point being that broadcast standards were first imposed on the US by a Democrat - and those standard have been getting more and more permissive ever since then.

      So you can thank the Republicans for the soft-core porn that is MTV2 and VH1. You can thank the Republicans for NYPD Blue and for Saving Private Ryan being 'cast in its entirety. You can thank the Republicans for blacks in starring roles with no stereotypes.

    19. Re:FCC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can thank both the republicans and the democrats for mangling the FCC into a populist censorship enforcement agency. Neither side wants full freedom of expression.

    20. Re:FCC? by mzwaterski · · Score: 1

      If anything, wouldn't they go after the person supplying the game patches? I've yet to be fined for watching last year's Super Bowl...

    21. Re:FCC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, if the religious right were actually trying to 'go back in time and make standards stricter', Janet Jackson wouldn't have even been booked, much less broadcast.

      Get over the hyperbole and try common sense and rational thought for a change. This stuff is fun to debate, but once one side starts saying stupid shit, it kinda ruins it. Please don't ruin it any more.

    22. Re:FCC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It started off MUCH WORSE THAN IT IS NOW. The very people you idiots are maligning have been slowly relaxing over the decades. It's getting better, not worse.

      Holy crap. It's like talking to a brick wall. A brick wall that's been crushed in the intense gravitational force of a black hole. Twice.

    23. Re:FCC? by databyss · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      " His point being that broadcast standards were first imposed on the US by a Democrat - and those standard have been getting more and more permissive ever since then."

      Yes, let's not blame those who abuse the system, let's blame those who implemented a system with good intentions. Firearms and cannons were invented in China. I blame the chinese for all deaths by ballistic weapons.

      "You can thank the Republicans for blacks in starring roles with no stereotypes"

      Yes, I'm sure it has nothing to do with the fact that blacks can actually act well. DAMN YOU DEMOCRATS FOR TRYING TO REINSTATE SLAVERY!

      Oh, btw, what does this have to do with regulating what broadcasters do on public air waves?

      --
      Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
    24. Re:FCC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PERMISSIVE IS A GOOD THING, YOU NIT. That line wasn't blaming ANYONE.

      Your assertion that standards started off normal and were abused and twisted over the years is laughable. It has *only* gotten more relaxed over the years. It has *only* gone exactly in the direction we both want it to go. Maybe not as fast possible, but whatever.

      It's all part and parcel of "broadcast standards". Do you have any idea how much of a stink went up after the first interracial kiss on TV? Or even because that same show had a black woman in a non-stereotyped supporting role? That sort of thing just wasn't done back then.

    25. Re:FCC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's getting better, not worse.

      What the hell are you talking about? The FCC has recently skyrocketted the financial penalties for "indecency" incidents for broadcasters, and the idiots are trying to weasel their way into the VoIP market. It's not getting better, jackass.

    26. Re:FCC? by saintlupus · · Score: 1

      You can thank the Republicans for blacks in starring roles with no stereotypes.

      Someone hasn't been watching UPN.

      --saint

    27. Re:FCC? by wwest4 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and he's also a Democrat last time I checked. That was my point, sunshine.

    28. Re:FCC? by nofx_3 · · Score: 1

      Surely you post anonymously becuase you are wrong. If you follow this issue at all you will see there have been several bills in congress which propose to INCREASE fines for content the FCC terms indecent, and yet at the same time there is nothing on the books that explicitly states what indecency is in the eyes of the FCC so basically they are reserving the right to impose huge fines on content they simply don't like

      -kaplanfx

      --
      Visualize Whirled Peas
    29. Re:FCC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Online games.

      They're becoming more popular.

      They communicate over a communications medium.

      If the FCC can censor the cable TV I see, then they can censor videogames in the name of "public good."

      Just wait - the Internet will be regulated, content-wise, by the FCC. It's a few years coming, but it's coming.

    30. Re:FCC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good! It's about damn time.

    31. Re:FCC? by jcromartie · · Score: 0

      I wish I had points to mod this down. Have you ever heard of senator Joe Lieberman? He was and is one of the most active people in politics against video games... still doesn't ring a bell? He was Al Gore's vice presidential nominee, for one thing. Anthony Williams? He's backing a bill to ban sale of M rated games to minors in DC. Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich wants to make it illegal in his state. All of them are Democrats. Democrats are leading the charge against video games. Plus, there are no "Republican censorship standards" that I know of. Please provide evidence of institutionalized censorship by Republicans before making the claim.

    32. Re:FCC? by jabberwocky_rt · · Score: 1

      Yeah, just like Playboy Mansion, Leisure Suit Larry, BMXXX...

      oh wait...

    33. Re:FCC? by MikeSweetser · · Score: 2, Funny
      Someone hasn't been watching UPN.

      Chris: Where do you think you go when you die?
      Sam: I learned from church that if you're good you go to heaven but if you're bad, you go to a place where the dead believe they're still living and they pray for death but death won't come.
      Chris: UPN?

    34. Re:FCC? by databyss · · Score: 1

      We can't be talking about the same FCC. Yes, the regulations have become more lax relative to where they started, but (and that's a big but) they haven't kept up with the societal norms.

      They're still lagging behind what's acceptable public behavoir. I'm not saying that they should allow live sex on daytime tv, but the recent fine-sprees and heavy-handed enforcement of "decency" are out of control.

      --
      Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
    35. Re:FCC? by Luigi30 · · Score: 1

      (Peter turns on his VCR to record a football game, and the FBI storms his house) "Do you have written permission from the NFL and ABC to record this game?" "Just ABC." (Peter holds up a letter with the ABC logo on top, the FBI pull out their guns and shoot the VCR repeatedly)

      --
      503 Sig Unavailable

      The Signature could not be accessed. Please try again later or contact the administrator
  7. Holy Crap by Nintenfreak · · Score: 5, Funny

    They've got to have a testicle level. It's a bad day to be a sperm!

  8. To be followed by: by the_skywise · · Score: 4, Funny

    Family Guy Tennis
    Family Guy Go-Kart Racing
    Family Guy - Stewies Quest for World Domination RPG
    and
    Family Guy: Apocalypse, using the super uber cool Half-Life 2 engine.

    1. Re:To be followed by: by LewsTherinKinslayer · · Score: 1

      Family Guy - Stewies Quest for World Domination RPG

      Make it a Ratchet and Clank style game with lots of hilarious Family Guy style antics and I'd buy it. And I bet a lot of other people would too.

    2. Re:To be followed by: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Family Guy: Stewie vs. the Space Mutants
      Family Guy: Stewie vs. the World
      Family Guy: Stewie's Nightmare
      Family Guy: Virtual Stewie

    3. Re:To be followed by: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want an adventure game: Brian and Stewie in Road to Someplace Exotic. It had better include at least one musical number.

    4. Re:To be followed by: by goster · · Score: 1

      Family Guy - Stewies Quest for World Domination RPG that would be grrrrrrrreat!

    5. Re:To be followed by: by ectizen · · Score: 1

      Family Guy: Lois Does Quahog, a hentai dating sim.
      I may be the only one who'll admit it, but I can't believe I'm the only one who wants this...

    6. Re:To be followed by: by Anarcho-Goth · · Score: 1

      I think they should combine all of those into one spectacular game.

      --
      I hate Liberals and Conservatives.
      If you are a Liberal or a Conservative, then HAVE A NICE DAY!
      Courage.
  9. All right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Giggidy giggidy giiggidy!

    1. Re:All right! by Noclar7 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Leasure Suit Quagmire?

    2. Re:All right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd do everything to you Lois...

    3. Re:All right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What?

      I'd do anything for you.

    4. Re:All right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear diary: Jackpot!

    5. Re:All right! by daemon_mf · · Score: 0

      Joe: Hey Quagmire, you up for some gaming?

      Quagmire: Heh, sorry bud, they only thing I'm playing with is.. well you see where I'm going with this. Oh!

    6. Re:All right! by paulbsch · · Score: 1

      I believe that should be:
      Giggidy, giggidy, gigg-I-DY!

  10. 10 bucks says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...it's gonna be banned! :-)

    1. Re:10 bucks says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More likely it'll be more mild than a Ukranian Taco and suck, and then give you horrible craps.

  11. No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'll stick to drawing boobs on the etch-a-sketch...

    1. Re:No thanks by omninull · · Score: 4, Funny

      Go ahead, they always come out square.

  12. Let me be the first to say by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 4, Funny

    This game is freakin' sweeeet!

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    1. Re:Let me be the first to say by Dragoon412 · · Score: 1

      Giggity giggity! Awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwright!

    2. Re:Let me be the first to say by JNighthawk · · Score: 1

      It's not so much that I want to kill Lois... it's just that... I don't want her to be alive anymore.

      --
      Wheel in the sky keeps on turnin'.
  13. Cheesy Charlie's is great. by solowCX · · Score: 5, Funny

    Chris Griffon: They have a game where you put in a dollar and you get four quarters. I win every time.

    1. Re:Cheesy Charlie's is great. by nacturation · · Score: 1

      If I had a hole in *my* throat, I'd stick pennies in it!

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    2. Re:Cheesy Charlie's is great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "If I had a hole in *my* throat, I'd stick pennies in it!"

      You misspelled penis.

    3. Re:Cheesy Charlie's is great. by bugbeak · · Score: 1

      Chris Griffon: They've even got games in the bathroom! Look, I won a balloon! *flaps a condom*

  14. try this theory for size... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever so slightly off topic but, if the makers of Futurama made a video game that was actually good, would the whole making tv and films out games fad that hollywood has been going through help bring Futurama back to life?

    1. Re:try this theory for size... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      No.

      Futurama was expensive. Family Guy is cheap.

    2. Re:try this theory for size... by UWC · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe, but somehow Uwe Boll would get the rights to it.

    3. Re:try this theory for size... by n1ywb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      After four seasons they were already heavily recycling jokes. I love futurama but I don't think it really has any mileage left. Be happy with the DVDs.

      --
      -73, de n1ywb
      www.n1ywb.com
    4. Re:try this theory for size... by nofx_3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah but IMHO the cell shaded 3D scenes esp. the space fights and such were really worth it. I thought the animation was some of the best I had seen on TV. I like the one when Bender is floating through space with a civilation growing on his stomach. I love Family Guy, but I miss Futurama almost as much I wish they would create a super cartoon block (Simpsons 8, Futurmama 8:30, Family Guy 9, and then get rid of malcom and put arreted development at 9:30) best sunday night ever.

      -kaplanfx

      --
      Visualize Whirled Peas
    5. Re:try this theory for size... by fwitness · · Score: 1

      Yeah, agreed, although I still love to watch Futurama. Family Guy isn't much different though. My girl turned me on to Family Guy, and I loved it for a DVD or 3, but then it started becoming way too formulaic. Allow me to illustrate:

      1) Start Episode
      2) Have some sort of ridiculous flashback with pop culture references and low-brow denigration (yes Jay Leno has a big chin, Courtney Love is trash, Models are thin, etc)
      3) Show Peter do something stupid which creates a plan
      4) More flashbacks/what ifs with pop references
      5) Resolve plan, more flashbacks.

      Seriously, it started getting on my nerves to the point that I groaned whenever someone said a flashback que line. "This better not be like that time...." "Peter remember the time..." "That would be like if X was like..."

      I could be funny if I just made up some random stuff too. Like, remember that time I sprouted a Rhino horn on my nose and charged into Calista Flockheart, but I missed her cuz she's so thin? Mehhhahahah(Peter Laugh). Cuz she's thin. Mehehe. Freakin` sweet.

      It's a fantasy within fantasy within a fantasy. May be Ok for some but I had enough. I'll tune in to see if it's refined a bit but I expect more of the same. Thank god for Stewie and Brian.

      --
      -- I have fans? Wow.
    6. Re:try this theory for size... by asdfjilk · · Score: 1

      I agree! Because we could all use more refined 20 minute animated TV shows in our lives. Imagine the possibilities if we got the animators of Family Guy together with the writers of Frasier. Patend Pending Copyright Trademark 2005.. Sucker

    7. Re:try this theory for size... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL! For those wondering what the story is, check this link.

    8. Re:try this theory for size... by th3space · · Score: 1

      You know, King of the Hill is still around...only it airs (and has for a few seasons) at 1800hrs CST. It's been as neglected and butchered a show at the hands of Fox's crack schedule-makers as Futurama had been, and yet it's still around. Which begs the question: how much does Futurama's untimely demise have to do with Matt Groening and Co simply deciding to take a pass on being a bastard step-child to whatever sporting event was in season? You never hear of Mike Judge threatening to pull his show due to the far-too-frequent pre-emptions...of course, he doesn't have another cash-cow to fall back on.

      To stay on topic, in regards to a response: Fox should bring back both Futurama and The PJs and do nothing BUT animated shows on Sunday. King of the Hill, Family Guy, The Simpsons, American Dad, Futurama, The PJs....wooooo!

      (note: the PJs thing is a joke...but they could always add another animated show and be done with live action on the Lord's Day)

      --
      "How like you to drag your keyboard to a gun fight." - Aaron Bedard (BANE)
    9. Re:try this theory for size... by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Why not watch Adult Swim? They're one of the main reasons Family Guy is coming back.

      They have Family Guy at 11 and Futurama at 11:30 plus their other shows from midnight until 2. (Warning: May Contain InuYasha)

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    10. Re:try this theory for size... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      After four seasons they were already heavily recycling jokes.

      The 4th season was made-up of the crap that was rejected in previous seasons... That is why it sucked so horribly.

      Simpsons has gone down the same road, basically. The past 2 seasons have been utter crap, but I blame that on management, not the show itself. I won't mind if it dies off at this point, but it could still be a good show.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    11. Re:try this theory for size... by nofx_3 · · Score: 1

      Agreed, I love adult swim. But you are talking about repeat episodes. With them being played 5 days a week (Sun-Thu) you see futuramas 4 seasons and family guys 3 (and the first season was short, including weinstein I believe there are 51 episodes total) You soon start seeing repeats quite often. I am an adult cartoon junkie so I love other adult swim shows too, aqua teen, sealab 2021, and venture bro's are all great

      -kaplanfx

      --
      Visualize Whirled Peas
    12. Re:try this theory for size... by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Ah, but the new seasons of Family Guy, the second half of the ATHF, Sealab, and Tom seasons, the ACTUAL Squidbillies show, another Perfect Hair episode, and a whole lot of new anime are starting in May.

      Adult Swim is getting a LOT of new viewers, almost hitting 1 million on Wednesday for ATHF, and that means more new shows for us.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    13. Re:try this theory for size... by nofx_3 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to watch American Dad tomorrow. From your post you make it sound like the new Family Guy eps are going straight to adult swim. I was under the impression that the would actually be run by fox, hopefully on Sunday night behind Simpsons and with American Dad.

      -kaplanfx

      --
      Visualize Whirled Peas
    14. Re:try this theory for size... by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      The new Family Guy episodes WILL be aired on AS either at the same time as on Fox or slightly after. I already saw the American Dad pilot.. if you want to it's on myspleen.net

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  15. More future toon tie-in hits: by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny
    "Ralphie Wiggum's Nose Goblins" - The toy you make yourself

    "Aqua Teen Hunger Force: The Restaurant"

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:More future toon tie-in hits: by generic-man · · Score: 1

      In Aqua Teen Hunger Force: The Restaurant, would you make Baffler Meals at Burger Trench?

      --
      For more information, click here.
    2. Re:More future toon tie-in hits: by zerocommazero · · Score: 1

      Hate to tell you but there already is an "Aqua Teen Hunger Force" video game in production.

    3. Re:More future toon tie-in hits: by DavidLeblond · · Score: 1

      Actually there is already an Aqua Teen Hunger Force video game. I see it on Get It Now on my cell whenever I browse to see if there are any games with demos. It doesn't have a demo, so I have yet to play it but its there.

    4. Re:More future toon tie-in hits: by mgs1000 · · Score: 1
      "Aqua Teen Hunger Force: The Restaurant"

      They can build it right next to Grizzlebees!.

      Cowabunga!

  16. ...Why? by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Okay, the answer is obviously "to make money", but it's still sad. Shows rarely seem quite the same after all the movies, video games, etc based on them come out.

    1. Re:...Why? by XMyth · · Score: 1

      Strange, I never noticed that with the Simpsons, or Star Trek or Home Improvement (what evils you will uncover when you have the full SNES ROM set....).

  17. Simpson's Game by JDStone · · Score: 0

    Let's hope this isn't going to be another Simpsons game.

    1. Re:Simpson's Game by brotherscrim · · Score: 1

      I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that since it's going to be a Family Guy video game, there's a 0% chance that it will be another Simpsons video game.

    2. Re:Simpson's Game by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Good point. Given my many many years as a video gamer, I also feel that it's certain that the "Family Guy" video game will be almost, but not entirely, unlike a cup of tea.

  18. Simpsons H&R - Lame by AtariAmarok · · Score: 0, Troll
    I tried for quite some time to get that to recognize a standard multi-button USB joystick (one that no other games have a problem with), and when I finally got it going, it never worked well: it assigned motions/clicks to the wrong keys and for some of them it would not let me change them.

    The manual said to go to a help file for problems, but such a file was not found in the set of disks.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Simpsons H&R - Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So grab the GameCube version and go to town. Great game.

  19. Voices! by Second_Infinity · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nothing bugs me quite like a video game based on a tvshow/movie that uses the same characters but different voices.

    "The talented voice cast includes: Seth MacFarlane (as Peter Griffin, Brian Griffin, Stewie Griffin and more), Alex Borstein (as Lois Griffin), Seth Green (as Chris Griffin), and Mila Kunis (as Meg Griffin)."

    According to that statement it appears they will use the regular people for the voices! Excellent.

    Maybe the voices will be more believable than in Simspsons: Hit and Run. Heck, maybe it'll be a better game overall... but I doubt it. Games made after TV/Movies are usually fun for a while, but not for extended amounts of time (for me, anyway).

    1. Re:Voices! by hambonewilkins · · Score: 1

      Huh? Simpsons: Hit and Run used the actual voice actors. I kinda wish I knew what your angle was here.

      --

      God Bless America. Why? Did it sneeze?
    2. Re:Voices! by sqlrob · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hit and Run used the Simpsons voice cast.

    3. Re:Voices! by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      Futurama has the original voice cast. I think. It sounds like the original voice cast.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    4. Re:Voices! by Second_Infinity · · Score: 1

      Maybe Hit and Run wasn't so good of an example... I didn't realize the voices were the same due to the quality of the speech in the game, which was partially my point.

      I have played several other games based on movies or tvshows (like the futurama XBOX game, which was horrid) and some of the voice tracks were a bit... off. I don't know if they used different technology for voice capture or what, but they usually sounded tinny, muffled or just plain out of place. This is one point I was attempting to bring to light, not just using the proper actors.

      Sorry about that - I'll try to be a bit clearer next time.

  20. From the Family Guy franchise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Leisure Suit Quagmire

    1. Re:From the Family Guy franchise... by JNighthawk · · Score: 1

      The only tent I'll be pitching this weekend is... oh, you get the point! Awwwwright.

      --
      Wheel in the sky keeps on turnin'.
    2. Re:From the Family Guy franchise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what do you mean?

    3. Re:From the Family Guy franchise... by up2ng · · Score: 0

      Giggity, Giggity Giggity !

      --
      Success is not the result of spontaneous combustion, you must set yourself on fire.
  21. Go ahead! by the_skywise · · Score: 1, Redundant

    They always come out square!

  22. I guarantee a man made this game. by Snarfangel · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Of course a man made it, Lois, it's a program not a delicious Thanksgiving dinner"

    --
    This tagline is copyrighted material. Please send $10 for an affordable replacement.
  23. Could be sweet.... by nobody13 · · Score: 1

    Im drunk at work right now, so forgive any misspellings.... If it is made as an RPG, similar in style to earthbound... count me in.... Or possibly a top down action shoot em up, a la Zombies Ate My Neighbors. just my 2.

    1. Re:Could be sweet.... by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      Ahh, a fellow SNES fan. Best. Game system. Ever.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    2. Re:Could be sweet.... by __aamkky7574 · · Score: 1

      Drunk? At work? Where can I send you a CV?

      P.

  24. Does this mean that by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

    Paul W.S. Anderson will produce the movie?

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:Does this mean that by mkarpinski · · Score: 1

      Or maybe Uwe Boll?

      --
      As below, so above and beyond, I imagine drawn beyond the lines of reason. Push the envelope. Watch it bend.
    2. Re:Does this mean that by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Does it really matter? As long as the Bio Force Gun and humans mutated into zombies are there, we can rest assured that it will be true to the spirit of The Family Guy.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  25. Family Guy Cool Factor... by kiwidefunkt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...slowly falling...

    This kind of thing (animated series) doesn't need a video game, because it's GREAT the way it is. A video game, which who knows how seriously it will be taken (its production, not its content), is just cheapening the brand for true fans, ESPECIALLY if the game sucks.

    And no, if it's good I won't take back my complaining. I just won't tell anyone I like it.

    --
    www.kiwilyrics.com - a wiki for lyrics
    1. Re:Family Guy Cool Factor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, when Fox announced that they were going to start re-showing Family Guy, I wondered how they were going to kill it the second time. There's no way Fox would give a real second chance to a show they already decided to kill.

      They took a real black eye on Family Guy once it was evident that it really was popular and that they could have done real well with it. They have to do something to "prove" that it really was worthy of being canceled, and reviving it only to beat it into a bloody pulp sounds like a Fox-worthy move.

      Expect Fox to do everything in their power to prove that they really were, in fact, correct in canceling Family Guy in the first place. This video game is going to suck, hard.

    2. Re:Family Guy Cool Factor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good, because the show sucks, hard.

      And to think they're doing another show by the "creator of 'The Family Guy'" that looks to be even lamer...

    3. Re:Family Guy Cool Factor... by aero2600-5 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "This kind of thing (animated series) doesn't need a video game, because it's GREAT the way it is. A video game, which who knows how seriously it will be taken (its production, not its content), is just cheapening the brand for true fans, ESPECIALLY if the game sucks."

      This is just my personal opinion, but I don't think The Simpsons has been 'cheapened' by all the horrible video games they've made out of it. I still see it as an excellent political and social satire, and I don't think any number of video games would change that. Then again, I haven't played all The Simpsons video games.

      Aero

      --
      Please stop hurting America -- Jon Stewart
    4. Re:Family Guy Cool Factor... by kiwidefunkt · · Score: 1

      Good point. The more I think about it the more I agree that the series itself remains unaffected, but I do think all the Simpsons games are terribly corny. It seems like having an animate series' license is an excuse to make a silly racing/whatever game for some quick cash.

      Maybe I'm just taking the whole thing too seriously.

      --
      www.kiwilyrics.com - a wiki for lyrics
    5. Re:Family Guy Cool Factor... by aero2600-5 · · Score: 1

      "It seems like having an animate series' license is an excuse to make a silly racing/whatever game for some quick cash."

      If you take them at what they are, silly racing games, then you're not much disappointed. When you buy one, you should be cool with the idea that this is going to be just another racing game with the characters added in afterwords. How can you be disappointed if you don't expect too much? Also, try to think of what the ideal game would be. I love The Simpsons, but I really can't think of a great game that could be made out of it. If they ever do make a great game out The Simpsons, it'll likely be a great game on it's own, with The Simpsons thrown in for amusement value and branding.

      Aero

      --
      Please stop hurting America -- Jon Stewart
  26. Well, I'm sold by TomorrowPlusX · · Score: 4, Funny

    The massive licensing and merchandising program on tap will coincide with the new series launch for Family Guy on May 1st, and is expected to be one of the company's largest product blitzes to date.

    Product blitzes! Mechandising programs! That sounds like an AWESOME game.

    --

    lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet
  27. Re:Ugh by suso · · Score: 1

    Bah, that wasn't flamebait.

    I find Family Guy to be way overrated. Its like Simpsons, but on speed or something. Once in a while, its funny, but they really over do it.

  28. How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Family Guy: Attack of the Evil Monkey?

    1. Re:How about... by tomcode · · Score: 1

      Now Chris, you know there's no evil monkey.

      --
      f u cn rd ths u cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgmng
    2. Re:How about... by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1

      There is, in the closet

  29. Won't capture the show by nuggz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The game might have the same characters, but I don't expect the game to have the same humour of the show.
    I find Stewie and Brian to be the funniest characters anyway.

  30. I'm sure the merchandiser thought, by mfivis · · Score: 5, Funny

    I got an idea, an idea so smart my head would explode if I even began to know what I was talking about.

  31. Re:Ugh by gustgr · · Score: 1

    Family Guy has a more subtle and agressive humor that you can't find in Simpsons. They make fun Sex, Racism and Intolerance... it is freaking hilarius.

  32. Re:The greatest game of all time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your site was fun to crapflood. GNAALOL. because of me you had to put in crapflooding measures. GNAALOL.

  33. Huh? by Otto · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe the voices will be more believable than in Simspsons: Hit and Run.

    Umm, Simpsons: Hit and Run did use the original voice cast. All the people speaking in the game are the actual actors.

    Only complaint I had about Hit and Run was that it was too short and the levels are too small.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Huh? by Shadarr · · Score: 1

      Not only that, they had the actual Simpsons writers involved too. There were flaws in the game, sure, but you can't say anything bad about the licensed content. It's one of the few games I kept playing even after I got bored of the game, because I wanted to see all the material. Unfortunately, Homer's lines are the best and he's in it right away. "I have no insurance!" still cracks me up.

    2. Re:Huh? by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 1

      Oh no no no, you can't possibly top Granpa Simpson's "I'm horny! Take me to Grandma's World!"

  34. Oh good! by Telastyn · · Score: 2, Funny

    Another game which is tied to a marketting schedule and not a development schedule. I'm sure it will be a rising success like the Matrix game and the recent Lord of the Rings game.

    1. Re:Oh good! by LilMikey · · Score: 1

      Which LOTR game? Both the Third Age and Battle for Middle Earth seemed to be decently acclaimed. I've only played BFME but it's not a bad game at all.

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    2. Re:Oh good! by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      What about Van Helsing?

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    3. Re:Oh good! by Bluetick · · Score: 1

      Some of the recent LotR movies were pretty highly rated, such as the RTS game that came out a few months ago. Believe it or not, there have been good games based on movies. Chronicles of Riddick was absolutely amazing, while the movie blew.

  35. Re:Ugh by ishmalius · · Score: 1

    I must agree. The humor is too "in your face," with no subtleties at all. It doesn't seem to expect much intelligence of the viewer. The writers of the Simpsons, on the other hand, seem able to express big thoughts with small words, much like e.e. cummings.

  36. This game deserves to be priced high. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, like diamonds!

  37. Re:Ugh by Mike+Hawk · · Score: 1

    Its like Simpsons, but on speed or something.

    I've heard this before. Often from some of the same people who liked the Simpsons better "before". (Obviously I do not know if you personally are in the second camp) The thing is the Family Guy style is almost exactly that of the Simpsons from the "before" time. Meh.

  38. Something about Cheerios? by MorboNixon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Congratulations, Take-Two Interactive, the last horse finally crosses the finish line.

  39. Re:Ugh by wwest4 · · Score: 1

    | The humor is too "in your face," with no subtleties at all.

    Ahh - but were there really no subtelties, or did you simply miss them?

    [honk, honk]

    C'mon... tit, dick and fart jokes can be fun even if you are smart. If I want high-brow, I won't watch the Simpsons either... I'll read Proust or something.

  40. Just don't pull a Hit & Run by British · · Score: 1

    Take a look at the Simpsons games.

    1. Road Rage - It was just a simpsons-themed Crazy taxi. Game got incredibly boring after awhile.

    2. Hit & Run.I was actively playing this game until I got Katamari damacy(and then burnout 3).

    They really could have gone further with H&R. With over 16 seasons of content, the missions ended up being "go from a to b". Congradulations, you just re-created Smuggler's Run in Springfield.

    Whether it be minor or major characters, they could have fleshed out the missions to go beyond driving and stuff it full of fun references. How come no Kent Brockman on the radio whilst driving? Thankfully it only cost me $20, as it is no Grand Theft Auto.

  41. correction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    the once cancelled animated family

    correction: the TWICE cancelled animated family
  42. SIms2 Mods by ThatDamnMurphyGuy · · Score: 1

    I always thought it would be cool to have a Sims2 version with all of the Simpsons characters in Springfield. To bad Family Guy doesn't have more characters.

  43. Re:Ugh by Crazyjamaican46 · · Score: 0, Troll

    What the hell are u talking about. Family guy is way better than the simpsons and it has always been. Family guy has been off the air for a while now and most fans have seen every show, yet everyone I talk to still really enjoys it. If I see a repeat of the simpsons I just change the hannel but somehow Family Guy is diferent. It is one of those very rare showsthat you can watch over and over again and almost never get sick of. THANK GOD FOR FAMILY GUY AND SCREW U SUSO

  44. Re:A moment of your time, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do you happen to possess any extra cromosomes? i think you dooooo

  45. My favorite cartoon-based game by macklin01 · · Score: 3, Funny
    wasn't really a cartoon-based game, but an add-on to Quake III. I just loved the [url=http://www.planetquake.com/polycount/info/qua ke3/homer/homer.shtml]Homer player model[/url] model that could be downloaded and used in the arena.

    I used to start a custom game with all Homers and watch the AI characters fight. Just watching 6 Homers jumping all over the place, yelling "Woo-Hoo", or "My legs ... I can't feel my legs", or doing the victory dance "I am evil Homer! I am evil Homer!" when taunting other characters just left me in tears I was laughing so hard. (Obviously, graduate school and fatigue make the stupidest things feel pretty hilarious. :) -- Paul

    --
    OpenSource.MathCancer.org: open source comp bio
    1. Re:My favorite cartoon-based game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oops, I used forums-style linking ... Homer player model There it is. -- Paul

  46. Chin Balls by Minute+Work · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why do the chins on all the male characters look like a pair of testicles?

    http://www.familyguyfiles.com/episodes/showfull.ph p?image=FG-112_2.png/

    1. Re:Chin Balls by Non+Est+Tanti · · Score: 1

      Maybe they have chinballalitis, like Butters.

    2. Re:Chin Balls by MrP-(at+work) · · Score: 2, Informative

      they made a joke about that in an episode

      peter says like "so that's where they went!" and he grabs his testi-chin and puts it in his pants.

      heh

      --
      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    3. Re:Chin Balls by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 2, Informative

      No. He goes "What are these doing up here?" Its /., the land of the nitpick.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
  47. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or, it's one of those shows you watch about 5 seconds of, and think, "my god, how can anyone watch this crap or see any humor in it?"

    Which I still think, every time I land on Comedy Central and they happen to be playing it.

    "57 Channels, and *THAT'S* on?"

  48. Heh by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    When I was in Austria on business, I found the Simpsons in German. The person they got for Marge was pretty close to the original voice. Everyone else... not so much.

    And apparently German for "Doh!" is "Dnein!" I could be wrong about that though. The jetlag hadn't worn off by then either...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  49. Well I know by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1
    see how long it takes for the Stewey branded Diapers.

    I would wear, err, I mean buy...yeah thats it - buy a pair for my son. ummm, well I don't have a son yet, so I will just ummm stock up, just in case.

  50. Re:Ugh by UWC · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Objection! Family Guy took a few comedic elements that the Simpsons used in some of the middle seasons, and the show is pretty much a hasty framework on which to hang predictable cutaway gags, random and consistent placement of widely remembered pop culture bits in unlikely positions, and hit-and-miss attempts at real humor. An episode here and there is amusing, but when one watches it consistently, the reuse of maybe three humor devices becomes predictable, and one begins to see the hastily assembled show underneath. Despite that, I still watch it on occasion and enjoy some of the humor. And the more general riffs on some broad cultural feature can be amusing. One of my favorite bits in the show is the Brian and Stewie-hosted introduction to the Treehouse of Horror/Anthology of Interest-style episode in the (until recently) final season, as it's not (to me, at least) obviously pulling from any single source, but is definitely using some vaudevillean standard base.

    Also, it's not hard to come up with comical juxtapositions of particular cultural icons. Observe:

    Peter: "Hey, i-it's like that time that the Beav witnessed that mob hit!" [cut to black-and-white scene of child looking in horror as gunshots are fired, perhaps injecting a bit of Road to Perdition by having Ward as one of the mobsters]

  51. Formula for a Family Guy Game by jameskojiro · · Score: 0

    1. Take the latest Leasure Suit Larry Game.

    2. Replce voices with Family Guy Cast.

    3. Replace Graphics.

    4. Release "Family Guy: The Quagmire Conondrum"

    5. Profit!

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  52. damn, forgot to sign it by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1
    see how long it takes for the Stewey branded Diapers.

    I would wear, err, I mean buy...yeah thats it - buy a pair for my son. ummm, well I don't have a son yet, well not one that I didn't buy, so I will just ummm stock up, just in case.

    ----M.J. Jackson

  53. Creativity abounds in the entertainment industry! by Infonaut · · Score: 2, Funny
    Wow, someone is going to get a huge raise for coming up with this extraordinarily imaginative concept. Let me get this straight: They want to take an animated TV series and... ok, I'm still trying to grasp this... they want to take the characters and put them into a video game? Imagine the possibilities!

    If this is anything like the Simpsons games, it's going to be friggin' awesome! Anyone who can take a comedy show that pokes fun at family and culture and turn it into a game where the characters run around bashing things is getting my hard-earned dough.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  54. Not a sequel? by vikramrn · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This is not a sequel to 'The Guy Game?' Damn!

  55. Re:Ugh by UWC · · Score: 1

    Wow, when I read the first part of your post, I really thought it was going to turn out as a joke, but somehow it maintained its unabashed and unwarranted praise for a program that is not separated so much into episodes as it is into memorable bits. If I recall a joke from the show, I can almost never remember what episode it was from because almost every joke is a complete tangent from the main, usually generic, plot. Maybe it's rewatchable just because of that. You can never remember which jokes are coming because there's no way to remember any of them in a context of any sort. Woo! Epiphany!

  56. Re:Just don't pull a Hit & Run by BK+Over+IP · · Score: 2, Informative

    How come no Kent Brockman on the radio whilst driving? Not to be the pedantic Simpsons fan, but Brockman is on TV. KBBL would've been good though...

  57. Ooh yeah... by the_skywise · · Score: 1

    That'd be:
    Family Guy: Dance Dance Revolution!

  58. Re:Ugh by Mike+Hawk · · Score: 1

    So whats your objection? You state that they took the framework the Simpsons were using at the time, that being the frequent cut-away, and build the episodes around that. The Simpsons has always been infused with pop culture references as well. I didn't comment on the quality of one show or the other, merely stated that some people who claim to not like the style of the Family Guy do claim to like the style of older Simpsons episodes which are the same style with the Family Guy pushing the format just a bit further.

  59. ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in the future, please keep it to yourself.

  60. Re:Ugh by brianna · · Score: 1

    all of my friends are like in_fucking_sanely into this show. and i have to say that i just don't get it, either. if i'm baked out of my mind, it's funny. but i've watched it sober and i laff like once and episode. maybe twice. i actually don't think it sucks, it's moreso that everyone is so god-dammed gung-ho about it and they're setting my expectations way to high. and yes i know eveyrone borrows plotlines (hello "simpsons did it" episode of south park) but for gods sake there are 4 zillion programs out there to rip off, why does it always have to be the simpsons.

  61. they DO have stewy diapers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    check the article

    Headline Apparel & Infant/Toddler t-shirts and onesies
    Entertainment Accessories

  62. Re:Creativity abounds in the entertainment industr by chia_monkey · · Score: 1

    It'll never work. How can they make the characters on the game "life-like"?

    Hell, I'll buy the game just to hear Stewie scream "Stop mocking me!!!" to the broccoli.

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
  63. Re:Ugh by UWC · · Score: 1
    I was actually saying that Family Guy pulled one or two of the particular types of humor that was used in the Simpsons in that period and stretched a show around high concentrations of a few types of joke.

    I did misinterpret your tone, though. It struck me that you were praising Family Guy rather than drawing attention to the apparent hypocrisy of certain fans. I'd like to add to that certain other fans who hail the purported unprecedented creative genius of Seth MacFarlane while blissfully ignoring the liberal (and freely admitted by MacFarlane himself) borrowing of humor from a particular era of the Simpsons.

    That said, I do find Simpsons episodes of that era to be more story-based than Family Guy. With Simpsons, I remember particular episodes and generally the context of jokes within. With Family Guy, I really have to struggle to recall the episode in which a memorable gag was featured because of the completely tangential nature of most of them.

  64. Coming soon from Nintendo... by techstar25 · · Score: 0

    Joe Swanson Wheelchair: Double Dash!

  65. Am I the only one... by DwarfGoanna · · Score: 1
    ...thinks a bunch of execs asked the writers, "Can we take the Simpsons and Savage Nationize them by, oh....30%?"


    Don't get me wrong, some of the writing is pretty funny, and the animation looks fine, but I can't shake the feeling that some of the humor is pretty targeted. By that I mean pandering to the Angry White American Male of the 21st century. There is something forced, imo, about shows that pretty much scream, "Look at me, I'm politically incorrect! I don't care who I offend!"


    Family Guy isn't the only one like this...it seems to be a marketing trend. I'm not some thin skinned knee jerk lib'ral feminist hippie faggot communist =), but when writers do that I feel like they're treating me like an idiot. I know pandering when I see it...anymore, we all should.

    --

    "You know why you do not see me styling wit my homies? Because I have no homies!!" -Mojo Jojo

    1. Re:Am I the only one... by hambonewilkins · · Score: 1

      That's funny, because McFarlane is a pretty liberal guy. As are many of the writers. So, it seems like he'd be on our side. For the most part, I think his jabs are far less offensive that those on South Park.

      --

      God Bless America. Why? Did it sneeze?
    2. Re:Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you want politically incorrect for the sake of being politically incorrect, without being funny, watch an episode of Drawn Together. Absolutely awful, and not funny at all.

      Family Guy may not be PC, but it IS funny. The kind of biting humor that doesn't usually make it to network TV.

    3. Re:Am I the only one... by Atzanteol · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican party. An elephant and a bit fat white guy who's afraid of change."

      Yes, very conservative... But the show doesn't pander. I think you're reading a bit too much into it. They pretty much insult everybody.

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    4. Re:Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Your post offends me. I like Family Guy, and I'm not an "Angry White American Male of the 21st century".

      I'm an Angry White New Zealand Male of the 21st century.

      You see, the wonder of Family Guy is that it appeals to all demographics.

    5. Re:Am I the only one... by miu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I actually gave the show a miss for the first half of season 1 because I got the impression of forced shock value and pandering from the marketing. Then I happened to catch an episode and discovered that despite the advertising focus it was very funny. The show was all about absurdity, pop culture, and nostalgia - with the shock value actually playing a decreasing role as the show went on.

      --

      [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
    6. Re:Am I the only one... by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      Hm. I'm a Happy White American Female of the 21st Century, and I think it's pretty darn funny. If they're pandering to that demographic, they're not doing a very good job of it. Either that, or it's so jam-packed full of humor that even though I miss half of it there's still enough to entertain me.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    7. Re:Am I the only one... by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      I think Drawn together is funny.. I mean, it's all bathroom jokes. Just like most of Comedy Central.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    8. Re:Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll trade you a ref for a picture of your boobs and/or vagina, just put the link as a reply to this.

  66. Re:Just don't pull a Hit & Run by British · · Score: 1

    I know Kent Brockman is on TV, but he's so egocentric I think even he would like to hear his own voice on the radio. Who/what voice does the news when scripts call for it?

  67. Take Two - Nuff Said by Kainaw · · Score: 2, Informative

    I bought one game from Take Two - Lemmings. It didn't work. After hours talking to support, they realized it was because I had a wheel-mouse. They said wheel-mice weren't popular in their offices, so they never tested them. After an exhausing Alta-Vista (pre-Google) search, I found that the game failed to work with many PS2 input devices and would also crash if a USB device was plugged into the computer. Since they refused to give a refund for an unplayable game (remember, in-store policy is if it is opened it can only be exchanged for THE SAME game), I won't buy anything from Take Two again.

    --
    The previous comment is purposely vague and generalized, but all of the facts are completely true.
    1. Re:Take Two - Nuff Said by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      Lemmings was written by DMA Design and published for most platforms (including all PC platforms) by Psygnosis. The only thing Take-Two had to do with them was publishing the Game Boy Color version.

    2. Re:Take Two - Nuff Said by -kertrats- · · Score: 1

      Dude, just return it for the unopened copy, then go in a few days later (make sure not the same person working) and return the new copy for credit/cash.

      --
      The Braying and Neighing of Barnyard Animals Follows.
    3. Re:Take Two - Nuff Said by Kainaw · · Score: 1

      I was being brief: the full game title is "Lemmings Revolution" by Take 2 Interactive. It has cure 3-D pictures on the back of the box, but you can't make the cute pointer move over to the 'start game' button when you start the game.

      --
      The previous comment is purposely vague and generalized, but all of the facts are completely true.
    4. Re:Take Two - Nuff Said by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      Ah. That's unfortunate, I rather enjoyed Lemmings Revolution. I thought it was clever how they basically took the classic 2d game and make it buzzword compliant by wrapping it around a cylinder, thus making it "3d" without making the game overly complex and awkward like the original Lemmings 3D.

  68. Holy Crap! by mtrupe · · Score: 1

    Lets hope its better than The Simpson Road Rage game.

  69. oblig by Ravenrage · · Score: 0

    freakin sweet...

  70. Some Will Claim It's a Hit and Run ripoff by geoffrobinson · · Score: 1

    Family Guy, which I love, is different and very similar to the Simpsons (which I also love) at the same time.

    My first thought is people will be looking for any similarities to Simpsons games.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
  71. Thief! by fwitness · · Score: 1

    Oh my god! I just submitted this exact same post! Ok, maybe not exact, and you fleshed out my ideas better and made much more sense, but still. Dammit. You even trumped me on the example.

    Anyway, you're right, maybe I noticed the formula quicker since I first started watching it on DVD, at which pace you can easily see how predictable the jokes become.

    Let's hope they flesh it out a bit for the comeback. Call me crazy, but I love an underdog. :)

    --
    -- I have fans? Wow.
    1. Re:Thief! by UWC · · Score: 1

      [cut away to Underdog in some undignified position]

  72. Which are generally worse?... by suparjerk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... movies based on video games, or video games based on movies (or a TV series)?

    --
    I caught the Mountain Wumpus! He gave me his treasure chest ($100) to let him go free again.
    1. Re:Which are generally worse?... by cyroth · · Score: 1

      House of The Dead movie. Nuff said

  73. Screw 3D action! by Wescotte · · Score: 1

    The press releases contains only a few scant details, but the game will be a 3rd person action game that puts you in control of various members of the once cancelled animated family.

    I want a Family Guy adventure game!

    1. Re:Screw 3D action! by Jestrzcap · · Score: 1

      Hear hear! Thats a really good idea!

      --
      "I have great faith in fools: Self confidence my friends call it." ~Edgar Allan Poe
    2. Re:Screw 3D action! by spungebob · · Score: 1

      Freakin' sweet! It could be based on the Y2K apocolypse episode and you'd have to fight off mutant giant rats, hordes of tentacled Stewies and Randy Newman on your mission to find the fabled Carvel factory.

      But why stop there? They could also do a "Tropico" style game based on the country of Petoria... or an X-Wing style game of Stewie shooting down rival sperms... or an FPS game of Lois trying to escape from Stewie's "American McGee" style nursery nightmare of death and dismemberment. The possibilities are endless!

      Giggidy giggidy gig-i-dee!

      --
      It takes an idiot to do cool things - that's why it's cool!
    3. Re:Screw 3D action! by RichardX · · Score: 1

      Not me!
      Give me hackneyed 3D run 'n jump platform action with token puzzles and cultural references, or give me death. You can keep your new fangled innovation and originality.

      Pffth. You youngsters. Next you'll be suggesting they do something crazy like spend more time on the gameplay than the marketing!

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
  74. Re:Ugh by UWC · · Score: 1

    I've a theory that just popped into my head. I think that Family Guy may be relatively unique in that it's a show that appeals to a very broad section of the population due to its use of incredibly mainstream yet still specific pop culture references that people are only now able to get into because of a previously volatile and sparse airing schedule. Now that it is on nightly on not one but two basic cable channels, people are able to tune in to it nightly, confident that they have found a lost gem of a series, cut down before its time. They then go on to spew one-liners and recount the various shock-value bits to friends, believing they are evangelizing some little-known treasure.

  75. Re:Ugh by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

    Nothing about Family Guy is subtle. Sorry, I'm not buying it.

    Futurama had subtle jokes, like when they used the X-Ray on Bender's head and the CPU inside was a 6502, that was subtle.

  76. That's why by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "Hate to tell you but there already is an "Aqua Teen Hunger Force" video game in production"

    That is why the tie-in joke parent specified RESTAURANT, not GAME.

    "Would you like extra frylocke with that Meatwad? Do you want the meatwad rare, extra-rare, or dripping pink and still bleating?"

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  77. Family guy? What a joke by Trogre · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    After watching many episodes I'm convinved it's really just a spout of social commentaries by three old cynics.

    One pretends to be a family guy, another is dressed up as a dog, and the other one thinks he's a baby.

    I don't get it.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  78. Free advertising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So who got the kickback to put this story on /.?

    This place is so corrupt.

  79. wait till you father gets home by zakezuke · · Score: 1

    I find Family Guy to be way overrated. Its like Simpsons, but on speed or something. Once in a while, its funny, but they really over do it.

    Family guy
    Wait Till your father gets home

    I have to admit... I was first turned off from Family Guy because I found it to be very similar to "Wait Till Your Father Gets Home". In fact i'm still convienced that the characters were modeled after this little known Hanna Barbera cartoon. The "why me" father figure... the brain damaged son with bad hair... the wife that puts everything into perspective... the daughter who's obsessed with losing weight... and the child/baby who's plotting for money/world domination. It grows on you and you accept the fact that it's just a very good parity of the old great family comedies like "All in the family" and "Happy Days". It makes you sit back and smile and question whether or not television has improved over the past 30 years.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  80. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I think you've hit the nail on the head there - it's funny if one is "baked out of [one's] mind" and that's just the thing, everyone I know first watched it baked and it seems to me that watching it sober makes people remember how funny it was when they were baked so they laugh just as much.

    It's one of those shows where you can watch each episode 10 times and still notice something different each time and still be taken by suprise IMO.

    I've got a soft spot for Family Guy - watching it caused me to laugh when nothing else could.

  81. Re:ugh by nobody13 · · Score: 1

    uh. keep what to myself... the whole statement? or just certain parts of it? If your gonna be an ass, you could at least be a bit more precise.

  82. Re:Holy Crip he's a Crapple !!!!... by up2ng · · Score: 0

    He He

    --
    Success is not the result of spontaneous combustion, you must set yourself on fire.
  83. The word on the street is... by Jozer99 · · Score: 1, Funny

    The word on the street is that they had to delay the game until Blu-ray came out, as they couldn't squeeze all the necissary racism onto a standard CD or DVD.

  84. I'm going to admit this (as an AC) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alex Borstein is hot. And I'm not joking about that, either.

    1. Re:I'm going to admit this (as an AC) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen to that, brutha! A little more cushion for the pushin' is fine by me. ;-) (Also not joking)

  85. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are plenty of 1% jokes in there...you just happen to be in the 99% of people too dense to get them.

  86. Re:Ugh by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1

    You, sir, are in desperate need of a life.

  87. Re:Ugh by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1

    Interesting you say that. All of my friends who are HUGE family guy friends are not pot heads - many of them are avid anti-drug people. And I actually first saw and became addicted to the show before I had ever touched marijuana (when it was originally aired). One thing i've noticed, though - engineering-oriented people tend to not like it as much, mostly because they find it too random and unstructured. Scientists, mathematicians, and lovers of discovery in general, however, are absolutely enamored with it. I think it has to do with a whole true vs false intelligence thing. Those with true intellect love family guy, and those who pretend they're smart (ie - engineers) want to find anything they can wrong with it simply because it's a generally popular series that they don't have the brains to grasp it. It makes them feel inferior. Those with God complexes HATE that.

  88. Re:Ugh by UWC · · Score: 1

    I'll tell you what. You and all your imaginaut "lovers of discovery in general" can go to your ramshackle "HUGE Family Guy friends" clubhouse and talk about that time somebody did something. Those of us apparently unable to withstand the unprecedented randomness of your tired, predictable fast-cut pop culture regurgitator will somehow manage without your truly dizzing and, frankly, rather frightening intellects that are uniquely suited to interpreting the brilliance contained within such bits as "Peter's ancestor was tiny and fought chickens."

  89. Re:Ugh by theantipop · · Score: 1

    I feel sorry for the man who no can longer laugh at a joke but can see only "humor devices" instead.

  90. 3rd person action game? by WiggyWack · · Score: 1
    "...the game will be a 3rd person action game..."

    Oh, good, we need more of those.

    --
    Macintosh humor! MacComedy.com
  91. Re:Ugh by UWC · · Score: 1
    Yes, nerds can needlessly overanalyze technology, the legal system, and science fiction, but comedy? That's a no-fly zone there, buddy!

    I guess it's time I take a long look at where I am in life right now and how much time I've wasted not randomly mentioning things from the 80s.

  92. OT: flamebait by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1
    Family Guy = Republican Simpsons

    Just listen to the damned theme song, and notice which attitudes they mock and which they endorse.

    --
    Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    1. Re:OT: flamebait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seth Macfarlane hates Bush.

    2. Re:OT: flamebait by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Right, cause we all know how conservative it is to go on TV bragging that your wife nailed KISS.

  93. Well, alllllll right. by joeszilagyi · · Score: 1

    Giggidy giggidy giggidy!

    --
    Dude, where's my packet?
  94. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion