Slashdot Mirror


Puppy Linux Lets You Run From, Save To The Same CD

qewl writes "Now there's a live CD that can actually save data back onto its own disk! How does it work? The PC boots with a multi-session CD inserted in the CD-burner drive -- thus, Puppy Linux automatically knows which drive is the CD-burner, in case you have more than one CD/DVD drive. Then you use Puppy in the normal way. At shutdown, all the changed files in your home directory are saved back to CD. That's it. Next time you boot, all the personal files are restored!"

277 comments

  1. Hmm..birthday present! by 7Ghent · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, my girlfriend DID say she wanted a puppy.

    1. Re:Hmm..birthday present! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you buying birthday presents for a =GIRLFRIEND=?!

    2. Re:Hmm..birthday present! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about you, but if I got this puppy for my girlfriend, she'd quickly become my ex-girlfriend... okay, not really, but you get the point (PuppyLinux is not necessarily a good birthday present for your SO)...

    3. Re:Hmm..birthday present! by a_greer2005 · · Score: 0

      Is your couch that comfortable?

      Being that it runs on CD, it is likely neuterd, so go for a Mac Mini!

    4. Re:Hmm..birthday present! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
      PuppyLinux is not necessarily a good birthday present for your SO

      Wow. Thanks, Captain Obvious. You saved all two nerds with girlfriends from imminent failure.

    5. Re:Hmm..birthday present! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i don't know about you either.

    6. Re:Hmm..birthday present! by Nuclear+Elephant · · Score: 1, Funny

      If your girlfriend is virtual like most everyone's on /., I'd say your girlfriend _is_ a dog...or has been ported to one.

    7. Re:Hmm..birthday present! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just doing my job... carry on!

    8. Re:Hmm..birthday present! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For your shakes hope that your apartment windows are smaller than mine.

      I found out the hard way that neither monitors nor computer cases are very SHOCK proof...

    9. Re:Hmm..birthday present! by aichpvee · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, but does she run Linux?

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    10. Re:Hmm..birthday present! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine a beo-wolf cluster of these...

    11. Re:Hmm..birthday present! by TheWormThatFlies · · Score: 1

      Pfft. I would by far prefer this distro to a real puppy for my birthday. They are both cute, but one of them would grow up to be a big, smelly animal requiring regular walks, and possibly try to eat my cats, and the other would merely need an occasional upgrade.

    12. Re:Hmm..birthday present! by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1
      Why are you buying birthday presents for a =GIRLFRIEND=?!

      And there is the answer to why geeks have a hard time in relationships!

      --
      Have a nice day!
    13. Re:Hmm..birthday present! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They are both cute, but one of them would grow up to be a big, smelly animal requiring regular walks, and possibly try to eat my cats,
      ... and the other would grow up much more, to be an enormously big smelly OS requiring regular reinstalls, and possibly try to `cat` your eats.
    14. Re:Hmm..birthday present! by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

      Well, my girlfriend DID say she wanted a puppy.

      Dude, SCORE! And she wants a laptop too ... so she could just take this puppy with her wherever she goes and she'll have her computer. That's the same thing, right?

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    15. Re:Hmm..birthday present! by nova_ostrich · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh come on now, you know one of those nerds doesn't count because his girlfriend isn't the 15 year old from the chat room he thinks she is.

      --
      It's scary being a Flash and Flex developer on Slashdot. You guys are unnaturally rabid.
    16. Re:Hmm..birthday present! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If she wants a puppy, you gotta do her doggie style.

  2. Not quite there yet... by winkydink · · Score: 3, Funny

    Early adopters of Puppy Linux have reported that they frequently need to take it out of the drive bay so it doesn't make a mess. Also, if they leave it alone for any legnth of time, it starts making whining noises and chewing up files.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Not quite there yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You gotta take it out for a walk on a string.

    2. Re:Not quite there yet... by mikael · · Score: 2, Funny

      They'll have this problem "fixed" in six weeks time.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    3. Re:Not quite there yet... by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Sounds alot like that 'other' OS that 'everyone else' uses.

      tps reports

    4. Re:Not quite there yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hurd?

    5. Re:Not quite there yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    6. Re:Not quite there yet... by Orgazmus · · Score: 1

      Yes, RMS. "Everyone else" uses the hurd for their daily computing.
      Dont care what the bad minority of windows users tell you, they are wrong, and you are right.

      --
      The system had the verbosity of HTML combined with all the readability of compiled assembly viewed as bitmap images
  3. Interesting, now for the next level... by kcb93x · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is cool. I'll have to take a peek at it, but what would be really cool (mainly due to the size of modern distributions) would be a DVD +/- RW version of this, if Knoppix can compress ~2GB of software into a 650MB CD, think what we can do with 4.7GB of space...

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    1. Re:Interesting, now for the next level... by ErikTheRed · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Heck, dual-layer is pretty cheap now.

      --

      Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    2. Re:Interesting, now for the next level... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      If Knoppix can compress ~2GB of software into a 650MB CD, think what we can do with 4.7GB of space...

      hmm.. *scratching head* ~14.4GB?
      or perhaps 2 chicks at the same time?

    3. Re:Interesting, now for the next level... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many computers have dvd burners, though? Public ones rarely even have cd burners.

      A neat feature would be a program where you can insert your cd, and then a new one so that it can just put your latest data, therefore compressing space. Then just pick up a 50 pack of cd-r and your set for life!

    4. Re:Interesting, now for the next level... by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Dual layer media is cheap now? Where? At newegg.com it's still $6 per disk.

    5. Re:Interesting, now for the next level... by Delita · · Score: 1

      I've seen R9 media as low as 1$ a disk, but it's write once, not rewrite. Are there even any R9 rewritable devices available?

    6. Re:Interesting, now for the next level... by Delita · · Score: 1

      Obviously I didn't RTFA soon enough. My question about dual layer RW devices still stands though.

    7. Re:Interesting, now for the next level... by LordoftheWoods · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't be able to write to a cloop compressed filesystem like knoppix has. Ever tried remastering knoppix? Takes forever to compress the whole disk. And you cant add files to it once its compressed.

      A DVD would still increase available space, but compression is pretty much out of the question in such a situation.

    8. Re:Interesting, now for the next level... by docflan · · Score: 1

      Heck, dual-layer is pretty cheap now.

      $5 a disk ... so ... you're wiping your ass with twenties nowdays or what?

    9. Re:Interesting, now for the next level... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      If I had a million bucks I think I could arrange that

    10. Re:Interesting, now for the next level... by Curtman · · Score: 1

      Imagine a beowulf cluster of Knoppix DVDs.

    11. Re:Interesting, now for the next level... by cinaquoomba · · Score: 1

      what about DVD-RAM? huh? huh?

    12. Re:Interesting, now for the next level... by Curtman · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't be able to write to a cloop compressed filesystem like knoppix has.

      This looks promising.

    13. Re:Interesting, now for the next level... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All it takes it cocaine and liquor.

      $250... Tops...

    14. Re:Interesting, now for the next level... by xiang+shui · · Score: 1

      I'm finding it easier to imagine a Beowulf cluster of ClusterKnoppix CD's. But then, I've never had much of an imagination.

    15. Re:Interesting, now for the next level... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then, I've never had much of an imagination.

      Or sense of humour apparently.

    16. Re:Interesting, now for the next level... by SethJohnson · · Score: 1

      The user files could potentially be written uncompressed to a seperate file system. Not the compressed one. That part of the disc stays read only.

    17. Re:Interesting, now for the next level... by noidentity · · Score: 2, Funny

      hmm.. *scratching head* ~14.4GB?

      My modem ran at that speed years ago!

    18. Re:Interesting, now for the next level... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree. I like the monospace goodness.

    19. Re:Interesting, now for the next level... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heck, dual-layer is pretty cheap now. 1 dollar for a dual layer dvdr is not cheap compared to a 10 cent normal dvddr.

    20. Re:Interesting, now for the next level... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've tested puppy, and it's no Knoppix. Don't expect this feature, with the quality of Knoppix, it isn't there. It will, however, run on older hardware.

    21. Re:Interesting, now for the next level... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I re-disagree, and think that you are also annoying for supporting the mono type font. In fact, I'd go so far as to say .. STFU noone cares.

    22. Re:Interesting, now for the next level... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, so are hard drives. Why do we need this again?

    23. Re:Interesting, now for the next level... by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      Would you mind sharing where exactly you found it for this price? Best I've seen is 3 packs for $20+

      If I could get them for $1 each, I'd be buying spindle packs full right now.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
  4. I read a review on this distro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's a real dog.

    1. Re:I read a review on this distro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean dawg.

  5. Re:Puppy linux? by snuf23 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah I guess it should be called:

    Mutlisession CDR Bootable/Saveable Linux

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
  6. I can see it coming... by ErikTheRed · · Score: 3, Funny

    And if the recordable disk goes bad, you get the exact same feeling as when your new puppy craps on the carpet!

    --

    Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    1. Re:I can see it coming... by Eberlin · · Score: 1

      The good and bad of it -- all your preferences can be saved so you can go to any machine that'll allow you to boot from CD (and one that'll run the OS, anyway).

      You can probably use it to carry OO.org documents, a couple of pictures, and maybe some dev stuff...anything relatively lightweight by today's standards.

      The main idea here, though is that the data isn't static. As you pointed out, that means the data is also susceptible to being hosed.

      Though the namers had "Puppy" in mind as somewhat of a toy/entertaining creature, I'd call this more of a tamagotchi. Persistent info...but don't put anything in it that you haven't backed up elsewhere unless you don't really care to lose it to begin with.

    2. Re:I can see it coming... by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't a simple USB keychain memory stick be so much easier and quicker? Not to mention reliable? Knoppix has done this for years...

    3. Re:I can see it coming... by Pantheraleo2k3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      RTFA. Everything runs out of ramdisk. So, when you shutdown, your data gets burnt. Since it uses a ramdisk, you can remove the CD while the system is running. If you don't insert the CD at shutdown when it asks, your changes won't be saved. Simple as that.

    4. Re:I can see it coming... by damiam · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Wouldn't a simple USB keychain memory stick be so much easier and quicker? Not to mention reliable? Knoppix has done this for years...

      Yes, which is why USB sticks aren't news. This is novel and at least potentially somewhat useful (not everyone with a CD burner has an extra USB flash drive lying around).

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    5. Re:I can see it coming... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, so if I want no-burn I take the CD out? I thought that's what Knoppix was for.

      The point was that the reliability of the medium isn't something you want to trust important data with. Back it up elsewhere, ramdisk or not.

    6. Re:I can see it coming... by John+Pliskin · · Score: 1

      I got a 512MB at Target for around 20 bucks on sale.

      $

  7. hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and you run out of space in how long?

    1. Re:hmmm by snuf23 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Shush! 640MB should be enough for anyone!

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    2. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you made a typo. It's always 640KB.

    3. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey retard, he's making a stupid joke using the approximate capacity of a cd and the stupid bill gates joke that apparently bill gates never said. It begs the question of irony.

    4. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It begs the question of irony."

      no it doesn't. please acquaint yourself with the actual meaning of "begging the question".

  8. Puppy Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But is it this cute?

  9. Good Idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is a good idea! I wonder if the library would mind me using that on there boxes...
    * goes off and starts downloading it

    1. Re:Good Idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where boxes? Oh, you mean *their* boxes.

  10. Re:Puppy linux? by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Warm Puppy Linux?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  11. yeah, but by carambola5 · · Score: 5, Funny

    yeah, but does it run lin...

    oh, nevermind

    --
    IWARS.
    People, in general, disappoint me. Politicians even more so.
    1. Re:yeah, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, imagine a Baywatch cluster of these.

      No, I not drunk.

  12. DVD? RW? by Apreche · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Will this thing work with a CD-RW? How about a DVD? DVD-RW? If it only works with a CD-R that's sort of useless because the CD will eventually fill up, and its basically a one-time use deal.

    What would be extra cool is if you could combine this with something like the gentoo catalyst livecd making software. So not only could I save files on the RW disc but could also customize which software is on the disc to begin with. So if I wanted to get rid of X and save more space for files I could do so.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    1. Re:DVD? RW? by drinkypoo · · Score: 0, Redundant

      How about using a DVD? Note that this is the same link from the story submission:

      Why should I use a CD-R, why not a CD-RW or DVD disk?

      I do not recommend a CD-RW simply because it isn't necessary. A CD-R is "write-once", but in multi-session mode, tracks can be written one after the other, up to 99 tracks or the CD becomes full.

      You could use a DVD-R, however I would discourage you. Puppy has a mechanism for keeping track of deleted files, and this may become unwieldy if a very large number of deleted files have to be kept track of. This mechanism works on a per-CD or per-DVD basis, and is going to be more manageable with the smaller number of files on the CD. Also, it could take years before you fill-up a DVD, and in the meantime, unless you leave it permanently in the drive, there is the increased risk of it being scratched.

      Note however, this is tentative advice -- it may turn out in practice that a DVD-R is a good way to go.

      With that pasted, it must still be noted that a normal CDR holds only 700MB. A normal DVD holds what, 4500MB? 4400? I'm honestly not sure. Anyway, if you're using this on a broadband connection it would be trivial to fill up that whole 700MB in a single session of downloading even 100% legitimate content; game demos, for example. If you have the DVD, might as well use it. Anyway you can install whatever software you want if you have enough disc space. You could install your own gnu toolchain for example, a DVD would have plenty of space. Then you could build whatever you liked, provided your ramdisk were sufficient.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:DVD? RW? by timeOday · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I wonder if you can pop in a fresh CDR at shutdown and have it burn a copy of Puppy + the current state of all your files? The media cost of CDR itself is hardly a concern.

    3. Re:DVD? RW? by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      The idea appears to be that you want to fill up CDs with past sessions. The author suggests that you would write the current date on a disc when starting it the first time, and then a closing date when it is full (you are automatically prompted), and put in a new disc. The reasoning being that you can have a whack of CDs that let you go back in time to particular configurations you were working with at the time, and a complete audit trail of all activity on the system over a period of time, however many discs that may take. You can also of course, use the hdd of the machine to save larger files that you want to keep around all the time, like a music collection.

    4. Re:DVD? RW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is obviously not meant for an install meant to download and play game demos.

    5. Re:DVD? RW? by iamnafets · · Score: 1

      Then again, the cost of a HDD of mediocre size (even 40gb) is almost to the level of a stack of CD-Rs. Not to mention the cost of the CD-RW.

    6. Re:DVD? RW? by BlastM · · Score: 5, Informative
      Of course, the CD is going to fill up eventually, so what then? No problem, at shutdown Puppy will automatically ask you to insert a new blank CD and will place a fully working bootable Puppy on it, create a first data track, and off you go again.


      So yes, it burns a new one, once you need it.
    7. Re:DVD? RW? by harrkev · · Score: 1

      I have a thought...

      My experience with Knoppix and distros based off of it are that they ONLY play nicely when inserted into the FIRST CD-Rom drive. I have three optical drives installed (CD-Rom, DVD-Rom, CD-RW). Obviously, if I have to boot from the first drive, that one can't write...

      Can anybody tell me why this "first drive only" limitation exists? Is it inherent to the way that you boot from a CD, or is it a peculiarity of Knoppix?

      TIA

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
  13. Its been done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Linspire "Thriller" (membership req) LiveCDs have been able to do this for some time.

    1. Re:Its been done by sh1ftay · · Score: 0

      Membership Required: The Anit-Linux.

  14. Re:Puppy linux? by winkydink · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    They could have named it Anonymous Crowhead.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  15. Puppy huh by LittleGuernica · · Score: 3, Funny

    Finally I can send a K-9 unit to the rescue. This is a whole new "pedigree" of software indeed.

    1. Re:Puppy huh by LittleGuernica · · Score: 3, Funny

      and I just have to make this one too.. "Honestly, My Linux distro ate my homework"

    2. Re:Puppy huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but does it come with a Brandy cask.

  16. nice! by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was just discussing this earlier about whether Knoppix could do just that. I suspect it will only be a matter of weeks or even days before we see a Knoppix version that can also do this.

    --
    bash: rtfm: command not found
    1. Re:nice! by qewl · · Score: 3, Funny

      Funny- it was I, the parent of your post, who submitted this article ;-)

      --

      (\_/)
      (O.o) This is Bunny. (> <)
    2. Re:nice! by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 0

      ha! it's a small world, after all

      --
      bash: rtfm: command not found
    3. Re:nice! by bmsleight · · Score: 1
      Morphix has had this feature for over a year called cd-pesistent.

      Full code is in the CVS, nice GUI, you can either /home, /home and configs or everything back to the LiveCD. Save Incremental changes or full changes. CD-Persistent allows the use of a CD-r or even a better CD-RW. For further details see the HowTo with screenshots. (Disclaimer - I am the main developer for this module)

      I was just discussing this earlier about whether Knoppix could do just that..

      Morphix a modular based which basically takes away the hard work of re-mastering a Knoppix CD The base, the part based upon Knoppix contains the kernel, kernel modules, hardware detection, etc. This base is left untouched. You can either a change a mainmod or add lots of minimodules to make different liveCDs

      I submitted a note on the Knoppix mailing list, in May 2004 offering to add this code/feature to Knoppix, but did not get much feedback.

      I feel I was the first to have a liveCD save data back to its own CD - all code GPL'ed, buy hey that development, he who shouts the loudest.

  17. Now that's planned obsolescence by TheGuano · · Score: 1

    And how many times can you boot/shutdown before you need to copy the distro + your latest config to a new disc, or before you just fill up the CD with pr0n?

    1. Re:Now that's planned obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      once

    2. Re:Now that's planned obsolescence by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      I'd assume it depends on how you use it. Fill it with MP3s and videos, and it'll fill quickly. If you don't do much with large data sets, I doubt the average user would see it fill all that fast.

      Best-case scenario? Your .bash_history accounts for most of the session changes.

    3. Re:Now that's planned obsolescence by TheGuano · · Score: 1

      Doesn't a multisession CD take a few megabytes each time you add to it? Depending on the space the distro itself takes up, it could fill up relatively quickly...

    4. Re:Now that's planned obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At 18Meg per session (overhead for written to CD), a quick login is costly.

    5. Re:Now that's planned obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA

      A quick login requires nothing. It is the *logout* that could be costly *IF* (and only if) you choose to save the session.

      Plus i am not sure the 18Mb overhead is applicable as it is writing *per track* not *disk at once*.

  18. Re:Puppy linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Could they have picked a gayer name? Seriously.
    Bad Puppy Linux?

  19. Re:Puppy linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big Gay Al's Puppy Linux?

  20. At last! by c0l0 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Finally an application for rewriteable optical media that truly makes sense. Another nice feature is this distribution is cached into system memory completely at runtime, so you're able to unmount and use your CD-RW-drive for other tasks while running this system as well.

    This project deserves to be watched closely in the future, I'm eager to see what it's gonna offer in the future.

    --
    :%s/Open Source/Free Software/g

    YTARY!
    1. Re:At last! by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Finally an application for rewriteable optical media that truly makes sense.

      Actually, it's designed for CDR, not RW. The distro itself is 50 MB, and you have the rest, 600 or so MB, which is used to make up to 99 images of your personal files.

    2. Re:At last! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CD-RW Drive

    3. Re:At last! by undercanopy · · Score: 1

      ummm... Finally an application for rewriteable optical media that truly makes sense the grandparent wasn't that long.... how could you manage to not retain that part?

      --
      -- D-23994, Muff#2613
    4. Re:At last! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the future Puppy will be the basis for
      http://peace.wikicities.com/wiki/Tmxxine_Linux
      which is the first Linux being created for public domain time travel research and development. The innovation of the CD-RW Puppy (tested and already working) provides us with extremes of simplicity, speed, reliability and flexibility. Other distros with all their software serve other needs. Pups are cuter.

    5. Re:At last! by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      ummm... Finally an application for rewriteable optical media that truly makes sense the grandparent wasn't that long.... how could you manage to not retain that part?

      I understood that. My point (as it says in TFA) is that you don't need REwritable, just writable, and in fact the author recommends against CDRW, though it would work. How could you not retain that?

    6. Re:At last! by undercanopy · · Score: 1

      i did retain that.... i was replying to this AC post with my snide remark.. sorry for the confusion

      I'll take the blame for browsing at 0

      --
      -- D-23994, Muff#2613
    7. Re:At last! by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      i did retain that.... i was replying to this AC post

      I rarely read, and almost never reply to, AC posts, unless they've been modded up. They're mostly hit and run, it's impossible to have a dialogue.

  21. Linux on a puppy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I thought someone might have modded Muffy the Daggit from Battlestar Galactica.

    1. Re:Linux on a puppy? by dooglio · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Oh man I forgot about that lame mechanical dog! In fact, I forgot about how lame the old show was. Thank goodness they didn't put anything like that in the new SciFi version.

  22. really awesome by jonklem · · Score: 0

    now we can cary our workstation and our data with us, complete with the way we customized our environment. as the capacity of removable media gets larger and larger, the usability of this will increase even more.

  23. Forensics? by Chrontius · · Score: 5, Funny

    I predict this becoming big with the tinfoil-hat crowd -- they'll burn one session with music and keep it in their discman until they need it; then they've got their bootable Linux, and a way to get data out of a secure...

    This is reading like the plot of Alias, isn't it?

    Who cares. This is cool enough that I'm going to keep a copy in my backpack.

    1. Re:Forensics? by jedimark · · Score: 0

      Damn. now they know.. Now how am I going to smuggle US military secrets? ;-)

    2. Re:Forensics? by m50d · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've already done that. I've got a CD with knoppix-std and a bunch of MP3s. Everything but the MP3s is hidden under rockridge and joliet, so unless you look at it in DOS you won't see anything else on there. And it plays fine in my mp3 walkman. But boot from it and you have practically every cracking tool under the sun. Or at least every one that was released when it was made, it's getting pretty old now. Anyone know when knoppix-std 0.2 will be out?

      --
      I am trolling
  24. Encryption might be good. by un1xl0ser · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is a great idea.. but it says "The files are saved on the CD as normal files, not encrypted or compressed."

    That's great for Windows compatability, but I'd prefer my files to be encrypted, even on a livecd.

    --
    v4sw6PU$hw6ln6pr4F$ck 4/6$ma3+6u7LNS$w2m4l7U$i2e4+7en6a2X h
    1. Re:Encryption might be good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a great idea.. but it says "The files are saved on the CD as normal files, not encrypted or compressed."

      I know this is a really bizarre idea but maybe, just maybe, you could encrypt the files before they get burnt to the CD?

      I may be wrong but I don't think there's anything built into the ISO9660 standard that stops you from writing encrypted files. Maybe you can even compress them too. The sky's the limit!

    2. Re:Encryption might be good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, okay. So? This is one more step there. Hey, you could even add that feature yourself, right?

    3. Re:Encryption might be good. by un1xl0ser · · Score: 1

      Yeah. It would be easier to encrypt a loopback volume, but that would involve writing a new volume whenver data changed, right?

      Sounds like a job for FUSE.

      I think it would be easier just to have a live cd used for putting OS data, and a USB pen drive for personal data. That way you could have /home mounted from that drive no matter what live distro you were using.

      --
      v4sw6PU$hw6ln6pr4F$ck 4/6$ma3+6u7LNS$w2m4l7U$i2e4+7en6a2X h
    4. Re:Encryption might be good. by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      I am sure you could add this feature, but....

      Where would you keep the key. Hopefully not on the CD. This also means that you can't readily encrypt many files, such as those required to boot.

      Another option would be to have a small bootable Linux kernel/initrd on a USB drive along with a key, and an encrypted CDROM.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  25. Re:Puppy linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Whatever, 'winkydink'.

  26. Uhh... by inertia187 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm pretty sure that burning a puppy is illegal in most states. And I'm pretty sure that's doubly true for re-buring. Remember, Dead Puppies Aren't Much Fun.

    --
    A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    1. Re:Uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've obviously never tried the new microwavable puppies!

    2. Re:Uhh... by AgentPhunk · · Score: 1

      Just remember, every time you masturbate God kills a puppy. In fact, I have it on good authority that if you masturbate to Pr0n while using this LiveCD He kills both a puppy AND a kitten.

    3. Re:Uhh... by gopher_hunt · · Score: 1

      The puppy is on fire.

    4. Re:Uhh... by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

      Hey, those holy people have to eat too, you know!

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    5. Re:Uhh... by Storlek · · Score: 1

      The puppy, the puppy, the puppy is on fire.
      We don't need no pen drive, let that mother fucker burn!

      --
      Bears don't normally eat things that talk and move backwards.
    6. Re:Uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you make a kitten sound like a dog?

      Cover it in petrol and throw a match at it... woof!

      (not that i would condone that behaviour)

  27. Puppy does install to the hard drive by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Puppy is an odd distro isn't it? It looks and feels more like Win than any other lightweight liveCD but unlike most of them Puppy notes that the way it handles or expects to handle your hard drive there is no easy way to install it there. Apparently you have to copy it to one FAT partition, run it and install it into another FAT partition, according to the notes. I note this because running and distro straight off the liveCD is very very slow. They should have taken the time to write a better method to install it to the hard drive instead of trying to write/rewrite to the CDRW.

    1. Re:Puppy does install to the hard drive by mattmatt · · Score: 1

      Surely if you wanted to install Linux onto a hard drive, you wouldn't do it with a liveCD.

    2. Re:Puppy does install to the hard drive by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Surely you realize that many, many people install debian from Ubuntu or Morphix, and that the official installation method for installing gentoo linux is from a LiveCD?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Puppy does install to the hard drive by gelfling · · Score: 1

      Lots of distros like Peanut and a bunch of others I forget have some pretty good installation scripts built in that handle an installation to the hard drive straight from a version running on your liveCD right at that moment.

    4. Re:Puppy does install to the hard drive by GROOFY · · Score: 0

      Aye, and ye surely also know that the installation CD's for Debian and many others actually boot a linux kernel and then install the distro?

    5. Re:Puppy does install to the hard drive by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but if it's not a useful system it's not a livecd. Most of those installer CDs are only useful for running the installer. (well, and doing disk partitioning et cetera.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Puppy does install to the hard drive by xmp_phrack · · Score: 1

      I note this because running and distro straight off the liveCD is very very slow.

      Damn Small has a "to ram" option which speeds things up considerably. but DSL is very small ISO.

    7. Re:Puppy does install to the hard drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently you have to copy it to one FAT partition, run it and install it into another FAT partition, according to...

      JUST SHUT UP, FAT boy!

    8. Re:Puppy does install to the hard drive by 6th+time+lucky · · Score: 1

      A great trick (which might be obvious to some) is to first boot it "to harddisk" (i cant remember the setting but its in the readme), then subsequently boot "to ram". The 50 odd MB images goes from HD to RAM very quickly and runs even quicker. Much better than doing "to ram" from the CD everytime.

  28. USB Key? by xtal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wouldn't using a flash USB key make a lot more sense? Or am I missing something here?

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:USB Key? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not all flash devices are bootable and lots of computers don't support boot from usb. However, nearly all computers with a cdrw would be able boot the disc so it seems to allow a larger audience.

    2. Re:USB Key? by Chrontius · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not everything will boot from USB.

    3. Re:USB Key? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you missed the point. Boot from CD, Save session on USB memory. A few distros already do this.

    4. Re:USB Key? by Grey_14 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Also, 650MB of CD-R space is WAY cheaper than 650MB of USB Flash space.

    5. Re:USB Key? by pjr.cc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Personally, i use RUNT, which (as far as i can tell) is the only truely useable usb bootable distro... and yes, im with you, i think having a bootable usb linux is much more usefull than a cd distro, if only cause of size.. The best part of runt is the fact it boots off the key using umsdos rather than various knoppix distro's that boot off the key and load into ram... the advantage of this is the filesystem on the key is "live"... i.e. anything you do on it, stays on it.. (its based on slackware 10 fyi) Runt's also not busybox based which fits one of the uses i have for it perfectly... a robot... an epia (or similar) based robot, booting off a usb key running native linux... (so much lower power req's than a hd or cdrom drive) OK, so a cd is 0.50c, and a 512m usb flash is only AU$90, buts its so much more usefull...

    6. Re:USB Key? by Trejkaz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah. It would be good if a USB key or another kind of removable storage could overlay the entire filesystem so that you could do things like editing configuration files in-place.

      Imagine that for net cafes, though. As an ordinary user, you could get root access and install whatever apps you want, as long as your key is big enough to fit the overlay. As soon as you leave, the computer is automatically back in the pristine state, and when you return, no matter which computer you use, you see the same setup as when you last left... unless, of course, the net cafe has upgraded the distribution at some point, and then you might have some trouble. :-)

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    7. Re:USB Key? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Install and run the apps right from the USB key leaving no trace behind on the host

      See U3.com

    8. Re:USB Key? by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Looks a bit non-standard to me. If it won't work on a machine I will willingly use, there isn't a point in using it.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    9. Re:USB Key? by kidlinux · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One could carry a bootable CD with the distribution on it, and a USB key with their homedir/configs.

      --
      -kidlinux.
    10. Re:USB Key? by alvieboy · · Score: 1

      Technically speaking:

      Just store on the USB/Whatever flash drive the inodes that do differ from the installed RO(Read Only) version in the HD. And perhaps compress them on the fly.

      IMHO this is not hard to implement.

    11. Re:USB Key? by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      That's basically exactly what I meant by "overlay."

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    12. Re:USB Key? by docflan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wouldn't using a flash USB key make a lot more sense? Or am I missing something here?
      Yes.
      In spite of all the posters saying nothing will boot from USB, it is in fact quite common on even low cost motherboards these days.

    13. Re:USB Key? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even better, an ftp account. Although, this would probably only work in places with high upload speeds. But it would be cool to store all of your info at home, and then just upload changes.

    14. Re:USB Key? by Goeland86 · · Score: 1

      Mandrake did it!
      They give you a 20/30/40 GB USB 2 hard drive, a mini CD, and Mandrake 10.0 pre-installed on the usb drive. Pop in the mini-cd and there goes Mandrake. A friend of mine has it, and he loves it. He can access all his winXP files and use every game he wants without having to bother with hard drive partitioning.
      The only downside is the price, it costs about $250/300 because of the pocket drive.
      It's way too slow on a USB 1 plug though.

      --
      ---- I am certain of only one thing : I know nothing else.
    15. Re:USB Key? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think that many of those really old computers unable to boot from usb have a CD burner. USB boot has become really common since the introduction of Pentium III and Athlon MB. The main problem is the speed of 1.1 usb.

      For those old computers which doesn't support usb-boot, we are talking about the Pentium I et II era you know. The cd burners from that era were so slow that I don't think they are really suited for this usage. And I don't think that many of them still work correctly. All my old cd burners (yamaha and plextor) have become unreliable with the years and I don't use them anymore because most of the time, I get bad CDs and corrupted files.

    16. Re:USB Key? by MooseGuy529 · · Score: 1

      There are a few reasons USB keys don't make sense:

      1. They are much more expensive. A 512 MB USB key costs at least $50, while a 650-700 MB CD costs pennies.
      2. They are slower. I know from experience that booting from a USB key can be very slow. (Sometimes the planets align and it works well...) CD drives are a lot faster reading, and somewhat faster writing as well.
      3. Only very new computers boot to USB. My Asus M2400Ne, a beautiful (if a bit flimsy) Centrino laptop, boots to USB like a charm. It doesn't need to be pampered into booting a floppy image or anything. However, most computers can't do that. It's almost guaranteed that they can boot from CD, though.
      4. They are harder to replace. CD-RW's are everywhere, but you have to buy a USB key in a store.

      However, a USB key does have the advantage that it is more "live"--CD's would be re-burnt at shutdown while USB keys would be edited in real time. (Because of this, the CD would have a longer lifetime, and also allow you to revert to where you started by rebooting and not saving the home directory.)

      I'm looking forward to trying this--it looks really cool.

      --

      Tired of free iPod sigs? Subscribe to my blacklist

    17. Re:USB Key? by hey! · · Score: 1

      Pretty much all the liveCDs I've tried do this, including puppy.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    18. Re:USB Key? by hey! · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it would be great, except the results only work in about half the machines I've tried it on.

      The whole point of being able to do this is to have what amounts to a virtual machine you can carry on your key chain. If it doesn't boot on the great majority of machines you are likely to encounter, it's attractiveness is much lower.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  29. Re:Puppy linux? by YourMomsCock · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I hear they wanted to call it Anonymous Crowhead Linux but that was way too gay so they had to back off a bit.

  30. I may be a bit out of date on cd-rs by imsabbel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...but isnt there a session overhead of about 20-25MB for every burn?
    Wouldnt that make even an empty cd fail be filled after a months, nevertheless rather full distro cd?

    Whats wrong with using an USB stick for such things?

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    1. Re:I may be a bit out of date on cd-rs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats what I thought too! I think DVD+RW overcomes this and you can actually treat a DVD+RW more like a floppy disk than a CD-R. It would be nice to see this one done, with DVD burners becoming pretty standard I don't see it being a problem with regards to device support.

    2. Re:I may be a bit out of date on cd-rs by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Last time I looked it was 5MB overhead per session. I'm certain it's not 20MB. Even if it's 10MB that's not that bad. If you don't change anything it wrong write a new session. It wouldn't be a bad idea to use some kind of PacketCD-style thing to store the data; since you're booting your own OS it's pretty reasonable to handle writes that way.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:I may be a bit out of date on cd-rs by imsabbel · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just googled around and it seems the overhead is 18MB.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    4. Re:I may be a bit out of date on cd-rs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually its 28 mb for inital sessions, and 13mb for following sessions. http://www.mscience.com/faq67.html

  31. just bandage them up... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

    ... and get them a movie gig. They are really funny that way.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  32. So when I boot and download pr0n by syntap · · Score: 1

    will it have enough room left on the CD to store big movies, or just little jpg's?

    1. Re:So when I boot and download pr0n by Lehk228 · · Score: 2, Funny

      the distro is 50 megs, so you've got about 3 average porn downloads on there.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  33. Re:Puppy linux? by winkydink · · Score: 1

    Don't you mean Mutlisession CDR Bootable/Saveable GNU/Linux? :)

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  34. Re:Puppy linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MSCDRBSL for short.

    You only THINK I'm kidding.

  35. Re:Puppy linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're close, I think. How about Muttlisession Linux? At least it keeps with the overall canine theme.

  36. Re:Puppy linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Whatever, 'YourMomsCock'.

  37. Re:Puppy linux? by AaronStJ · · Score: 4, Funny

    Could they have picked a gayer name?

    No, they could not have. This name is more sexually attracted to other names of the same gender than any other name.

    --
    Stupid like a fox!
  38. Athlon K9? by codergeek42 · · Score: 0

    You're K-9's bites are no match for my K8's bytes!

    1. Re:Athlon K9? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So he's K-9's bites? I've never seen a bite posting on Slashdot! :-)

  39. Re:DVD? RW? Read the FAQ! by splante · · Score: 5, Informative
    Read the FAQ

    Why should I use a CD-R, why not a CD-RW or DVD disk?

    I do not recommend a CD-RW simply because it isn't necessary. A CD-R is "write-once", but in multi-session mode, tracks can be written one after the other, up to 99 tracks or the CD becomes full. You could use a DVD-R, however I would discourage you. Puppy has a mechanism for keeping track of deleted files, and this may become unwieldy if a very large number of deleted files have to be kept track of. This mechanism works on a per-CD or per-DVD basis, and is going to be more manageable with the smaller number of files on the CD. Also, it could take years before you fill-up a DVD, and in the meantime, unless you leave it permanently in the drive, there is the increased risk of it being scratched. Note however, this is tentative advice -- it may turn out in practice that a DVD-R is a good way to go.

  40. first 2 say! by minshrine · · Score: 1

    Well know i trully say that my dog ate my homework

    1. Re:first 2 say! by thryllkill · · Score: 2, Funny

      Was that your grammar homework, or spelling homework?

      --

      Note to self: No more arguing with the faithful.

    2. Re:first 2 say! by JNighthawk · · Score: 2, Funny

      -1 for "2" instead of "to".
      -1 for no capitalization of "I".
      -1 for no punctuation.
      -1 for "know" instead of "now."
      -1 for terrible joke.

      Congratulations, you have reached the famed moderation level of "-4, Never Post Again."

      --
      Wheel in the sky keeps on turnin'.
    3. Re:first 2 say! by erlenic · · Score: 1
      You missed one:

      -1 for "trully" instead of "truly."

    4. Re:first 2 say! by JNighthawk · · Score: 1

      Truly, I did.

      --
      Wheel in the sky keeps on turnin'.
  41. Now for it's next trick... by Matilda+the+Hun · · Score: 1

    ...Burn it's files onto a DVD! Admittedly, that probably wouldn't work if you have a lot of MP3s in your home directory, but, whatever.

    It's an interesting idea, but I'll stick with my hard drive for now, I think.

    --
    Tluin natha Linux xxizzuss uriu olt bwael mon'tun.
    1. Re:Now for it's next trick... by Trejkaz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      DVD should be somewhat simpler. You could theoretically use a rewritable DVD with a UDF filesystem to write whatever you want onto the disk, whenever you want. I think you could even delete files fairly easily using this approach.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  42. Re:Puppy linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol, what?

  43. Good for data recovery and such by Arthropod · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Anytime you need to get info off a messed-up pc that can't transmit to a useful network location, and doesn't have USB-ms drivers on it, but that has a cd-rw, this sucker would be a godsend. I've booted up on a knoppix cd more than once with the idea of writing files to a cd using knoppix. Though I suppose it would work just as well to boot into something that can load itself completely into memory, and free up the drive.


    Anyhow, even if some of that is available, it might just plain be convenient. I like the idea, anyway

    1. Re:Good for data recovery and such by rj4x · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've booted up on a knoppix cd more than once with the idea of writing files to a cd using knoppix. Though I suppose it would work just as well to boot into something that can load itself completely into memory, and free up the drive.

      I use knoppix-std (security tools distro) from time to time. there is a "tomem" cheat code available at bootup for loading the image into memory - provided you have enough. As you would expect, things run faster.
      I can't say for sure but I presume the cdrom is free after knoppix is up and running.

    2. Re:Good for data recovery and such by Bwmat · · Score: 1

      There is a livecd called slax http://www.slax.org/ that has an option at bootup to copy itself to ram and eject the cd, but because its designed to run on a mini cd (180 mb i think) it doesn't need too much ram.

    3. Re:Good for data recovery and such by Quino · · Score: 3, Informative

      Puppy linux does load completely into RAM, freeing up your burner, btw.

      It only asks for the CD that it booted from during shutdown to burn the changes.

      I've been running it for kicks for the last couple of hours, and I'm very impressed! It's of course minimalist, but very functional (with Gxine and Firefox installed, I'm even streaming music).

      If you're going to give it a try, keep in mind that, for me, it ran significantly better after the first reboot (and burn of session). Not sure why that would be ....

    4. Re:Good for data recovery and such by brasscount · · Score: 1

      This has tremendous potential for Linux Forensics and data recovery. Knoppixis already a great tool for it (and even for Windows forensics) since its so easy to disable swap. Now if Knoppix noswap could be combined with a cd sessioning tool, I could have a readymade handy-dandy little tool that would store my evidence on the same drive as a tool set. I can't wait to test this.

      --
      Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability: without Availability the other two are assured, as is Bankruptcy.
  44. dogs & cats by brer_rabbit · · Score: 4, Funny

    since you can only have 99 tracks the CD, wouldn't "Eleven Cats" would be a more fitting name? Or "99 bottles of Linux"?

  45. Re:Puppy Linux? by moonbender · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Actually, I'm a bit worried. How did the passed-out woman end up with her face on the dog's butt?! Hmm.

    --
    Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
  46. Linux Live CDs now required to surf the Net! by usurper_ii · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Pretty funny for all the "everything will be connected, even your toaster," crowd out there ... it now seem that because of the ever increasing spyware/malware/viruses, etc., pretty soon we will have to boot up a live Linux CD to use the Internet.

    I would use Ubunto, which is the first live Linux I have gotten my hands on, but it wouldn't pick up my modem correctly (probably a win modem thing). Other than that, and the fact that it wouldn't play MP3s without a plugin, I loved Ubunto. Linux is way close to "getting there."

    But after I wasted three days getting some powerful trojan crap off my computer not too long ago (yes, on an XP system), running from a CD and having a read only hard drive while connected to the Net seems like a pretty good idea, to me!

    Usurper_ii

    1. Re:Linux Live CDs now required to surf the Net! by __aaitqo8496 · · Score: 1

      I love my Ubuntu.. works on my laptop just fine (havne't tested modem compatability).

      If you add the restricted repository to apt-get, i believe there are drivers in there for winmodems. Furthermore, you can just install XMMS for mp3-playing, or gstreamer for use with rhythmbox

    2. Re:Linux Live CDs now required to surf the Net! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, it's "Ubuntu".

    3. Re:Linux Live CDs now required to surf the Net! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Load the whole CD to ramdisk, and enjoy the speed!

    4. Re:Linux Live CDs now required to surf the Net! by johnlittledotorg · · Score: 1

      Following the really simple steps of the Unofficial Ubuntu Starter Guide will get you configured for about every media type out there in just minutes. It's one of the best Linux resources I've ever seen.

    5. Re:Linux Live CDs now required to surf the Net! by fmobus · · Score: 1

      well, this approach could be called "disk operating system". oh... wait

  47. Wonderful by cdcarter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have been using Puppy Linux for a while now, and it is a wonderful distro. It's small, but it has tons of stuff. It has a nice working X server, abiword, a few web browsers, tons of other utility's and NTFS support. It is really fast if you have enough ram for /usr to be a ramdisk. I highly reccomed it for anyone looking for a non-knoppix derivative.

    --
    "Love is like a trampoline, first it's like "SWEET!!" then it's like *BLAMM!*"
  48. Packet Writer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why they not use packet writing instead of multisession cd-r?

    It's a patch for the linux kernel that make it treat CD-RWs as another local filesystem, you can write and remove files as you can do that in your harddrive, no need to blank all the cdrw.

    I tried it on the nitro kernel patchset, and it was fast on 4x media :D

    (I think Nero InCD does the same thing)

    1. Re:Packet Writer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why they not use packet writing instead of multisession cd-r?

      Because packet writing sucks. Not the Linux implementation but packet writing in general.

      It's slow, it's horribly unreliable, it's....well isn't that enough?

      CD-Rs/CD-RWs just weren't designed to be written to like that. It's like floppy disk RAID - you can certainly do it but at the end of the day you will lose data and everyone will laugh at you.

    2. Re:Packet Writer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      from experience packet writing (udf) is not reliable at all, at least under windows. It's the best way to lose data.

  49. Re:Puppy linux? by linguae · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, but at least it's not named:

    Extreme Multisession CDR Bootable/Saveable Linux XP 3000

  50. Is there a GNU in that??? by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Should be called Calf/Linux or something...

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  51. Gaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This looks like it would be really sweet for gaming at the university. At home i have just dial-up, at schoool i've fast connection and sweet monitors.

    I haven't played Doom since it wouldnt run on my home system, so maybe i'll get a chance via linux.

    I sure hope it works with cd-rw

  52. Internet Cafes by headkase · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wouldn't using a live CD as your OS as an internet cafe owner save you megabucks on the hard drives you didn't have to buy? Not to mention no spyware dangers, or no users mucking up the configuration of the machines? And as a customer, simply rebooting when your done would clear all sensitive information.

    --
    Shh.
    1. Re:Internet Cafes by conteXXt · · Score: 1

      since you are presenting a linux desktop anyway, why not use something like ltsp and really be able to lock it down.

      --
      The truth about Led Zep should never be told on /. (Karma suicide ensues)
    2. Re:Internet Cafes by saitoh · · Score: 3, Informative

      While not entirely unrecomendable, there is the problem that people who go into inet cafes generally only know about Windows and how to use Windows and part of your business model is having a place where people can come and "easily" use the systems, even to the point of it being painfully easy and intuitive. This can be argued endlessly, but if your ever doing something like this, its something to consider.

      As for the solution for windows users to prevent the altering of a configuration:
      www.symantec.com/goback/

      My university uses it to lock down the general student labs. In 3 years, I've seen it work well.

      --
      We don't need an "overrated" so much as we need a "you completely missed the parent's point, dumbass..."
    3. Re:Internet Cafes by MyIS · · Score: 1

      A workstation with network-mounted root is probably an even better solution; and it's been done many times before.

      --
      http://zero-to-enterprise.blogspot.com/
    4. Re:Internet Cafes by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't using a live CD as your OS as an internet cafe owner save you megabucks on the hard drives you didn't have to buy? Not to mention no spyware dangers, or no users mucking up the configuration of the machines? And as a customer, simply rebooting when your done would clear all sensitive information.

      I can see the Slashdot headline now... "Puppy Linux costs hard drive, spyware, encryption makers millions of dollars in lost sales."

      But maybe it brings new business to data recovery companies... that is, data recovery from DRAM that's had its power removed before the data was re-written to the CD-R. I used to boot from a RAM disk and had to run a backup script periodically in case of unexpected power outage, which occurred a few times a year.

    5. Re:Internet Cafes by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Wouldn't using a live CD as your OS as an internet cafe owner save you megabucks on the hard drives you didn't have to buy?

      Using a small, dirt-cheap hard drive, and leaving out the CD-ROM, would save you just as much. And a hard drive is sure to be much faster than a CD.

      no spyware dangers, or no users mucking up the configuration of the machines? And as a customer, simply rebooting when your done would clear all sensitive information.

      All this can be just as easily accomplised with a hard drive, and is no more assured on a CD-based computer...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:Internet Cafes by NewStarRising · · Score: 1

      I was recently in a McDonalds restaurant and saw that they have an Internet Cafe.
      From a quick glance, the system looks to be a proprietry "McInternet" interface. Almost certainly running on Windows, but themed/skinned so far as to make any resemblance to the Windows Desktop unnoticable.
      This system is meant for non-techies, and seems to work well.
      My point? Any system can be themed/skinned and its behaviour altered. The McD's systems were not obviously Windows, and could have been ANY OS underneath - the user is not to know, they just press teh "Internet Please" button, and browse web-pages as usual.
      A Linux Live CD might work nicely for this.

      --
      b3 4phr41d 0f my 4bov3-4v3r4g3 c0mpu73r kn0wI3dg3!
      MadDwarf
    7. Re:Internet Cafes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they don't care. They automatically ghost each computer every nights.

  53. Linux Puppy? by Frankie70 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Is this Linux's answer to Microsoft's Clippy?

    1. Re:Linux Puppy? by peasleer · · Score: 0

      Microsoft has a puppy, too. Linux just can't beat Microsoft's army of cute help assitants.

      --
      Mythos : Logos :: Slashdot : Intelligence
  54. Re:Puppy linux? by winkydink · · Score: 1

    Run along now and finish your homework. Big quiz in Health class tomorrow.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  55. yes but does it have a cold nose? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thank you, i'll be here all week ;)

  56. Re:Puppy linux? by snuf23 · · Score: 1

    Hmmm. I think if we add the word "edition" in there somewhere we've got the perfect name!

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
  57. Re:Puppy linux? by AnonymousCowheart · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or cowheart!

  58. So... by Joey+Patterson · · Score: 0

    How much is that doggie in the window?

  59. No - USB Key for Personal User Files! by xtal · · Score: 1

    Boot from the CDROM. Use the USB key for a user directory, or whatever.

    Isn't this easier than always writing to the CDROM, a slow and more likely to fail matter?

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:No - USB Key for Personal User Files! by Chrontius · · Score: 1

      Yes it is, but it's already been done -- MandrakeMove tried it, but it never took off since you had to pay for USB key compatibility. A free implementation of the same would be awfully nice, though.

  60. Puppy Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought it was called "Anonymous Crowhead Linux"?

  61. Re:Puppy linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aww, if only I had mod points right now...

  62. Yup. by sootman · · Score: 4, Funny

    They don't come
    when you call.
    They don't chase
    squirrels at all.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:Yup. by stor · · Score: 1

      Mum says puppy's days are through...

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
  63. load "kernel32.sys" ,8,1 by saboola · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, but does it run Windows?

  64. DVD-RAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You know, there's a perfectly good media called DVD-RAM which works exactly like a floppy drive - only with 4.7Gb capacity. It's a true writable format with a media that's relatively durable.

    DVD-RAM drives are less common than DVD/CD-R/RW, but at around $60, there's no reason not to have one if you want to run something like Puppy Linux on your own computer. (And DVD-RAM drives rock anyway, I've been using mine for casual data backups).

  65. Warning by EggplantMan · · Score: 0

    I heard this one was a real bitch to get set up.

    --

    ?-|||-----x<*))))><
  66. improvements to the LiveCD model by fludlight · · Score: 1
    LiveCDs like Knoppix and NetBSD 2.0 Live![torrent] nowadays seem better configured out-of-the-box than many distro installers. For example, the NetBSD liveCD is the only *nix that manages to run my PCMCIA 802.11 card without hours of painful configuration (recompiling the kernel, hunting down drivers, etc).

    I would love to see a straitforward utility for installing the OS from the CD to the hard drive, not just copying the filesystem but automatically modifying the necessary config files.

    As things are now, liveCDs let us test drive an OS/distro. If we like it then we need to download another CD(s) and go through a laborious install and configure process. This is fine with most setups, but is a nightmare for configuring non-standard hardware (namely PCMCIA wireless cards), especially when the liveCD works so well.

    LiveCDs can be a better starting off point for installing OSs/distros than installer isos. So why not provide the option for the livecd to act as the installer?

    1. Re:improvements to the LiveCD model by m50d · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are a couple of distros that do that already, for example MEPIS.

      --
      I am trolling
  67. + Gnustep? by pentalive · · Score: 0

    Take this, Install gnustep, put it in a cubic black box, big 21" monochrome black CRT, Laserprinter...

    I think we got somthing..

  68. And its going to Everest! by luckytroll · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have archtected Puppy Linux in a laptop on an expedition to Mt. Everest - the Flash/CDROM combination will enable the laptops to work above 18000ft, where a lot of hard disks "pop" out.

  69. Posted from Puppy by TrippTDF · · Score: 1

    Im a Linux Novice, and I managed to get this CD working in no time. Well done!

  70. 1.0.0 alpha ONLY is multisession? by saskboy · · Score: 1

    http://www.goosee.com/puppy/multi-puppy.htm
    Can someone confirm that only the latest ALPHA version is multisession, and .9.9 is still a plain live CD?

    Also I wish they had a torrent available, I feel almost bad with Puppy being caught with its pants down, torrentless.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    1. Re:1.0.0 alpha ONLY is multisession? by gamepro · · Score: 1

      Yeah can just choose not to save the session when you shut down. By the way theres a torrent a few posts above you.

  71. But seriously folks... by mbaker911 · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't this be a great idea for a gaming console. Imagine PS3 running a sanctioned version. The owner could just plug in a keyboard and voila...Instant cheap computer. I'm especially suprised Sony doesn't take such an approach.

    1. Re:But seriously folks... by big+ben+bullet · · Score: 1

      i don't think a ps3 will be cheap compared to a low-end system, or even that mini mac thingy from apple

  72. Torrent by gamepro · · Score: 4, Informative

    I know I know, TF is infamous for the curropt LG3D file. Sorry about that, it was an accident. Heres a torrent for the puppy-1.0.0alpha-firefox-multisession.iso it's tested and works, pretty cool too. You have to be a member to DL the .torrent file, but we don't care who acesses the tracker. If someone wants to mirror the .torrent they are more the welcome to. heres the link for members http://www.titaniumforums.com/torrent/software/ind ex.php

  73. cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would be interesting to see pop up in other LiveCD projects (I'm looking at you Gentoo).

    In other news slashdot posters attempt to achieve the internet record of the largest amount of bad puppy jokes in a row.

  74. Puppy Linux runs on USB, Compact Flash, . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    According to the web site, Puppy Linux was originally developed to run off a Compact Flash reader, and will also run off a 128mb USB key (with the capability to keep files on the key).

  75. Re:Puppy linux? by dreadknought · · Score: 1

    Could they have picked a gayer name?

    No, they could not have. This name is happier than any other name.

    --
    What you reap is what you sow
  76. I wouldn't by bluGill · · Score: 1

    The problem is RW disks fail without warning, and they are only good for a 1000 writes (this is optimistic in my experience). Unless you do a verify after the write you cannot be sure that you data is saved. Worse, you have overwritten the last version too, so you can't use any hacks to get back older versions of the files you really need.

    DVD-RAM in a caddy, or not removed from the drive, shouldn't have this problem. Good luck finding a DVD-RAM drive anywhere though.

    1. Re:I wouldn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The LG super-multi drives (such as the GSA-4160B) support DVD-RAM, as well as all of the other standards like +R/-R/+RW/-RW/+R DL/CD-R/RW.

      Cheap too. Got mine for $120CDN a few months ago.

    2. Re:I wouldn't by afidel · · Score: 1

      Actually with a multisession disk you CAN get back the previous version of the file as all it takes is using the previous version of the TOC. The fact that the TOC is rewritten every time you close a session makes multisession inefficient, that's why packet writing ala UDF was invented, but for versioning it's GREAT =) Btw, you wouldn't have to use RW disks with this kind of a distro, in fact the linked article specifically mentions the author discouraging their use.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:I wouldn't by makomk · · Score: 1

      Windows software like DirectCD can do packet writing to CD-R's, but unfortunately Linux doesn't support this.

      The main advantages of this over the multi-sesion approach here is that it'd save the per-session overhead of 13MB - i.e. currently, every time you shut the system down and it saves files to the CD-R, there's an 13Mb overhead above and beyond the size of the changed files. I think it'd also help with the 99-track limit.

      Unfortunately, AFAIK no-one's working on Linux support for packet-writing to CD-R's; I can't even read them from Linux unless they've been "closed", let alone write to them.

      Oh, and CD-RWs really do suck, for packet-writing anyway. They fail soon er than you'd expect, anmd you don't find out about it until you try to read the data...

    4. Re:I wouldn't by Klivian · · Score: 1

      Packet writing for Linux has been available for years now, at least since the 2.3 series. It has been experimental and you have had to do some patching, but it has been possible. There have been problems getting some older drives to work, but never drives supporting Mt Rainier are usually no problem. Look at: http://lists.suse.com/archive/packet-writing/

    5. Re:I wouldn't by makomk · · Score: 1

      Packet writing for Linux has been available for years now, at least since the 2.3 series. I know about that - I've been using it for a while now, actually - but as far as I can tell, it only works for CD-RWs, not CD-Rs (unlike, say, DirectCD). Certainly, the version I'm using doesn't support packet writing to CD-Rs.

      And, as I said before, CD-RWs suck as far as data integrity is concerned, particularly with packet writing - they wear out and data silently doesn't write properly.

    6. Re:I wouldn't by bluGill · · Score: 1

      I wasn't talking about multi-session disks, I was talking about DVD+-RW. When either disks is formatted you can randomly read and write to the whole thing. (DVD-RW has some restrictions on this that we can ignore) This was the claimed advantage of DVD+-RW disks, you don't waste ~13 Mb, the space occupied by the previous versions, and one more of the max 99 sessions; everytime you write data to it. With multi-session CDs you won't go very long before the disk is full (max 98 boots). With DVD+-RW you overwrite previous data, but at the cost of loosing the older versions

      DVD+RW doesn't have the concept of a session at all. You cannot write a multi-session DVD+RW.

      Yes I have read the relevant standards. I've wrote programs that do write CD and DVD media.

  77. Hmmmm by Lord+Kano · · Score: 0

    Puppy is a linux distro.
    Doggies are puppies.

    Tell chicks you want some linux-style action and not get slapped.

    Fantastic.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  78. Ninnle's done it too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Need I say more? Go Ninnle!

  79. Re:DVD? RW? Read the FAQ! by jedimark · · Score: 0

    Hmm. I've always wondered if large multisession count discs have to load all the tracks in sequence to reconstruct the directory, or if each track has the entire directory structure replicated?

    If it doesn't replicate, and providing the disc doesn't get scratched in the meantime, might get a bit slow after a while.. :-}

  80. Don't forget by Francisco_G · · Score: 1

    Turn unit OFF before unplugging cord.

  81. Re:DVD? RW? Read the FAQ! by Novous · · Score: 1

    >A CD-R is "write-once", but in multi-session mode, tracks can be written one after the other, up to 99 tracks or the CD becomes full.

    99 steps is extremely low. That means you'll have 99 sessions maximum. Multi-session is very inefficient too. But you're using a CD in the first place, so I guess efficiency isn't high on your list. :)

    CD-RWs also have problems because they also have a limited number of writes. But you could cut down on the rewriting if you used some sort of hybrid multi-session scheme (where it did the multi-session method until it started getting out of hand, then rewrote the CD).

    Using something like that would give you a pretty long lifetime per medium.

  82. Great for Work by adamjone · · Score: 1

    Where I work, we try to lock down the operator machines that we install our client to as much as possible. I see Puppy as being a very quick and easy way to generate a locked down live disc for those client stations. It gives us a base OS install to start from. We follow that by installing our client software, then lock down the account to only run our app. Burn a copy, throw it in the client machine, and call it a day. If they ever replace the PC or if the disc breaks, it would be a very simple matter to burn another copy and toss it in. Much better than re-installing an OS, all of the client configuration, and locking down the account. I'm keeping my eye on this one.

    1. Re:Great for Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Puppy really is a very good puppy. I'm running puppy from a 256mb flash card using a compact flash slot to ide converter. Combine that with a mini-itx motherboard/512mb ram and you have a very nice, very cheap pc. And the boot time with compact flash is very good.

      I think some readers/commenters have missed some details about puppy:

      Once puppy live cd is booted you can install puppy to flash or hard disk using a built-in wizard. Once that is done you will have a writable storage space so you don't need to save your data to cd. Also, you can use a usb pen drive when you boot from cd and save your personal data to usb.

  83. Boot by GoClick · · Score: 1

    Most computers won't boot from a USB device, maybe not most factory-fresh ones but most out in every day circulation. And those in public settings often have this feature dissabled in the [password protected] system configuration. Still stands tho, CDs are a butt load cheaper than USB keys, even RW disks,

    1. Re:Boot by Andrewkov · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I mean just use a USB mem stick to store your profile and changes .. You'd still boot and run off the CD.

  84. What about the swapspace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about the swapspace? Is it dog slow?

  85. Re:Puppy linux? by SlashdotMeNow · · Score: 1

    I like the shortened version: Punix

  86. Re:Puppy linux? by nippalony · · Score: 1

    I like 'Puppy Linux', it's a nice name :)

  87. Sorry by tarth · · Score: 1

    Can you imagine a beo-woof cluster of these?

    1. Re:Sorry by bestadvocate · · Score: 0

      I tried and it crashed my immagination

      --
      my sig
  88. You'll run out of disk space with overwrites by BlakeCaldwell · · Score: 1

    AFAIK when you delete/overwrite a file on a multisession CDR, you're not reusing that space. New data is always written to a blank part of the disk, and the old data is ignored by the file allocation tables...

    So, you'll be running out of space with every file that's stored to the disk. Every time you shutdown and burn to disk, your .bash_history will be taking up that much more space.

    Still tho, _awesome_ implementation (haven't tried it yet).

  89. Re:Puppy linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or Penix?

  90. Re:DVD? RW? Read the FAQ! by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    I do not recommend a CD-RW simply because it isn't necessary.

    But does it work?

    "Not necessary"? Well, it will fill up.
    Is that really a completely neglible fact?

    This but for a DVD-RW sounds cool.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  91. slow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't this be mindboggingly slow?

  92. This is so awesome! by Marthisdil · · Score: 1

    Now even the geeks can all do it "doggie-style"!

  93. Missing functionality by Stavr0 · · Score: 1
    1. Commit current session without having to shutdown:
    puppy% livesess --commit
    Writing 42MB from ramdisk to cd session 23 ... done.
    puppy%

    2. How much room left, will it fit...
    puppy% livesess --status
    Media type is CD-R 700MB 23 sessions used, 76 sessions remain.
    322MB used, 378MB free space remain.
    42MB on ramdisk.
    Session can be saved on current CD.

  94. Re:Puppy linux? by sittingbull · · Score: 1

    They could have called it pussydog linuts.

  95. Is it fully-versioned? by GodLived · · Score: 1

    Is Puppy Linux a fully versioned file system? With each new track that it writes, it saves my files. Does it also remember my deletes? Does it have user-initiated write-back capability, forcing a new track even before shutdown?

    If so, wow - we have a fully-versioned archiving live filesystem. If I totally destroy something in the system during one particular session (and write it out not realizing the problem), (and assuming I don't hose the ability to write out my session) I should theoretically be able to boot back to a previous version and continue on.

    This should be immensely popular among distro creators, full-tilt hobbyists, configuration management specialists, and quality assurance people.

    Additionally, because it keeps track of everything, the computer intrusion forensics people should benefit from the permanent archival of the "every step you take" kinds of information. You just have to reboot or write back between every major change.

    Not to mention, you no longer need to remind yourself to make backups.

  96. DVD by The+UnDead+Kai · · Score: 1

    That would be great if done with a DVD But it will take some time before DVD burners are cheap and chips

  97. Parent probably NOT a troll! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read it and the OP again and decide for yourself;
    I might believe that harddisks die in cold murky weather, but the idea that a CD-Rom would work where a disk fails is absurd. It cannot be sealed (as well as a hd) and the optical parts are very sensitive to moisture and low temperature (at least indirectly).
    In any case compact flash or usb drives are a lot smaller, weight less (the 'drive' weight included) and probably suck less power.

  98. CD-RW? DVD-RAM? Why not CD-M/RW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If DVD's are too big (what about 3"?) and CD-RWs under packet writing are inefficient, how about Mount Rainier? CDMRW would seem to be the best fit.

    Puppy Linux should use that! (has anyone tried this on a 3" CD-R?)

  99. A question of internal pressure by Gnavpot · · Score: 1

    I might believe that harddisks die in cold murky weather, but the idea that a CD-Rom would work where a disk fails is absurd. It cannot be sealed (as well as a hd)

    How does a sealed harddisk behave when the outside pressure drops? Will it suffer damage from the difference between internal and external pressure?

    This seems to be his main concern.

    I do not know whether harddisks are hermetically sealed, though. Google found this discussion with highly contradicting opinions: http://216.239.59.104/search?q=cache:SAGduiPmHLQJ: www.computer-chat.com/hardware/Hard_drives_are_her metically_sealed_200576.html+harddisk+ambient-pres sure&hl=da&client=firefox-a

  100. Re:Puppy linux? by Alpha_Traveller · · Score: 1

    Well.... *I* would have named it Slash*nix, in honor of this oft-re-usable collection of articles, files and assorted other junk we like talking about so much here on Slashdot.

    It's all about the re-use baby.

    --
    "Love is like pi - natural, irrational, and very important." (Lisa Hoffman)
  101. Re:Puppy linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could've been worse; could've been something like Windows, Linux, or (God forbid) Lindows.