Slashdot Mirror


WinOS+QEMU+Knoppix 3.8 = WinKnoppix!

chronicon writes "As reported earlier Knoppix 3.8 was presented and CD's distributed at CeBIT recently. For those of us who were not able to attend, some kind folks have posted a torrent for all to enjoy. Now, here's where it really gets interesting. Using QEMU (processor emulator) chris-uk has posted a modified version of Knoppix 3.8 that will run under Windows if auto-played, or if you wish, you can boot the CD for normal Knoppix. You can find the torrent here."

232 of 356 comments (clear)

  1. Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can it run WINE?

    1. Re:Yes, but... by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 3, Funny

      So, the question then becomes, can wine then boot QEMU, producing a theoretical infinite amount of emulation. If only we can get it to wrap around somehow...

      I think my brain just exploded.

    2. Re:Yes, but... by Jorkapp · · Score: 1

      Its just like The Sims. You can watch your sims watching their sims watching TV.

      From penny arcade:
      "I call it the eternal jackass. There were levels of meaning there I couldn't even begin to comprehend."

      --
      Frink: Nice try floyd, but you were designed for scrubbing, and scrubbing is what you shall do.
    3. Re:Yes, but... by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 4, Funny

      But, a beowulf cluster of these knoppix cds, running the sims, watching the sims watch tv... That would probably cause the universe to fold in on itself.

    4. Re:Yes, but... by compm375 · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is one fatal flaw. Wine Is Not an Emulater.

    5. Re:Yes, but... by The+Hobo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Remember guys, any platform. Wine has also been ported to Windows.... (!)

      --
      There is another kind of evil which we must fear most, and that is the indifference of good men. -- Boondock Saints
    6. Re:Yes, but... by ChairmanMeow · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm sure you meant to post this link...

      --
    7. Re:Yes, but... by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      That would only happen if they're watching the Simpsons on TV.

    8. Re:Yes, but... by pilardi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > Can it run WINE?

      Yes, it can.

      I tried the simplest application I could think of: Putty. And it worked. I ran Putty within Wine within X-windows within Knoppix within QEMU within WinXP. I wonder how much further I could take it...

      By the way, I am posting this message within Konqueror within X-windows within Knoppix within QEMU within WinXP.

      - pi

    9. Re:Yes, but... by adeyadey · · Score: 1

      Can it run WINE?

      No, but you can run it while drinking wine..

      But maybe if it did run WINE, you could run WinKnoppix under that..

      --
      "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
    10. Re:Yes, but... by 9-bits.tk · · Score: 1
      Or at very least, cause the computer to crash. And maybe spontaneously combust.

      I like explosions.

  2. So in otherwords. . . by episodic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Knoppix continues to be all that and a bag of chips :)

    1. Re:So in otherwords. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Knoppix continues to be all that and a bag of chips :)

      Did Knoppix even exist in 1991?

  3. Umm by Kethinov · · Score: 4, Funny
    from the oh-klaus-you-hypnotize-me dept.
    timothy, I think you need a vacation. ;)
    --
    You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    1. Re:Umm by uhlume · · Score: 1

      Oh, for fucksake, that wasn't a troll. Do I need to include fucking semantic markup in every post for people who can't otherwise parse humor?
      </sarcasm>

      Fucking modbots.

      --
      SIERRA TANGO FOXTROT UNIFORM
  4. Re:Great, But... by TelJanin · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can save Knoppix settings to a drive. Presumably the people have done this (couldn't RTFA, site is slashdotted)

  5. Re:Great, But... by episodic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What is the point? What is the point of art? What is the point of music? What is the point of climbing everest? What is the point of spinners? I digress. . . The point is well - hey it is cool! ( I think) :)

  6. now all they need to do.... by oliverthered · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is import all the settings across from windows and you can tell you granny it's the latest version of the internet and your away.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:now all they need to do.... by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      she is alive, and slightly more valid than before.

      I had to take here down for a nap while I fixed the shoddy xhtml.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  7. WinKnoppix! by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 5, Funny

    Gesundheit.

  8. hope for good performance by virtualone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    i never tried out qemu, but i suspect it to be substantially slower than a native knoppix boot.
    on top of qemu comes the fact, that the whole system runs from a cd, which by itself has bad seek times.

    i hope that people won't get false implessions, because they will get that 'linux runs slower than windows' feeling.

    --
    Only morons moderate based on a sig.
    1. Re:hope for good performance by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      qemu is a virtualizer, not an emulator. Most of the code gets run at the native speed of the host computer. Similar in principle to VMWare. You can run Linux systems relatively comfortably under qemu.

    2. Re:hope for good performance by Anne+Honime · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Qemu is damn fast, in my experience ; I wouldn't dare quantify it, but running win 98 under qemu on a 900 Mhz Athlon is perfectly OK, and it is impressive, quality-wise. Moreover, if host and target cpu are identical, there's a fast version of qemu to avoid unecessary emulations - didn't try that one, though, because it segfaulted on my FC2, and I was happy enough with the regular emulator so I didn't bother to investigate the issue any further (I did the build from CVS, so I expected glitches).

    3. Re:hope for good performance by Guspaz · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wrong. QEMU is a full system emulator. There is a processor module availble that virtualizes the CPU instead of emulating, but it is closed-source and linux-only. As such the windows version of QEMU is a full blown emulator.

    4. Re:hope for good performance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      So you're saying it dynamically recompiles x86 code into x86 code.

      That's exactly what it does, and in a portable way.

      The x86 has several modes of operation: real, v86, protected. There are also hybrid modes such as unreal mode. Also has submodes/privledge levels (rings) when in protected mode. In order to run code for any of these modes of operation in protected mode in the lowest privledge level on your machine (i.e. as a user program) it needs to recompile the code.

      It also means that if you're running on a PPC or other non-x86 machine, it dynamically recompiles x86 code into your native machine's code.

  9. Re:Great, But... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because you can then let people try before they buy without even needing to reboot.

    It just removes one more hurdle. People aren't going to wipe out their system just because the local geek said "its ready for the desktop".

    People need some proof that it really is better.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  10. Captain she can't take anymore by ejaw5 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Quick! Someone boot the server with a Knoppix CD!

    --

    $cat /dev/random > Sig
  11. Re:Great, But... by kryogen1x · · Score: 1

    You don't need to wipe your system, Knoppix is live eval. Isn't that proof enough?

  12. Login? Why?-is it illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I understand people are supposed to login for getting torrents of illegal stuff. Why are we supposed to login for getting a legal torrent?

    1. Re:Login? Why?-is it illegal? by TheKarateMaster · · Score: 1, Informative

      Huh? There's a direct link to the torrent in the article. At least, it worked for me. I wouldn't bother for a day or two, though. This torrent is officially slashdotted... My download rate at one point reached a maximum of 0KB/s

    2. Re:Login? Why?-is it illegal? by TheGavster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Isn't the idea that a slashdotting is the best case scenario for a torrent? Provided, of course, that the traffic ramps up gradually so that there is a significant body of (different) data distributed.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    3. Re:Login? Why?-is it illegal? by TheKarateMaster · · Score: 1

      Yeah, now I'm getting 62 down. It was just the first ten minutes or so where I didn't get anything. I guess it handled the sudden rush better than I would have predicted. :)

    4. Re:Login? Why?-is it illegal? by Taladar · · Score: 1

      You could still /. the tracker with a really big number of downloaders in a really short time.

  13. oh mercy.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You want to put a perfectly good running OS on a shiddy Windows base why?

    1. Re:oh mercy.... by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      Actually, this could be very useful in some specialized applications. At my school, I sometimes want to do my homework at the library, but I need TeX. The library machines are all winxp boxes, with no TeX. Enter Knoppix! Only problem, the techs were actually smart about something for once. They disabled the cd and the floppy as boot devices in BIOS, and set a BIOS password. Crap (although, late versions of Knoppix don't have TeX anyway...). So I'm reduced to installing MikTeX temporarily on the HDD, and using windoze anyway. However, with this new deal...
      What I'd like to see is a site where you could select up to one cd's worth (or one dvd's worth) of debian packages for inclusion on a custom knoppix cd. Then the server serves up a nice shiny iso image. Of course, I guess I could do this manually, but who has the time for that! :-p And also, I guess this would kinda defeat the whole dl the iso via bittorrent idea... leading to high bandwidth costs, dead servers, etc. crap. well, nevermind on that idea.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    2. Re:oh mercy.... by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      You could always use cygwin, which also comes with tex and doesn't have the overhead of a complete operating system. Or go with colinux which should be a bit faster than qemu and knoppix.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    3. Re:oh mercy.... by ViaD · · Score: 1

      Yea! You see. Win users try it on their computer, like it. Goes to bed. Wake up and start the computer, booting up Knoppix, and they will never turn back :)

  14. Time to try Linux (again) by fohat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've recently been looking into running Linux on my primary desktop to record music with. I could never get the Knoppix live CD to run correctly on my Gateway X700 system. I'll have to try this version and see if I can get anything to work.

    Linux has been a frustration of mine for the past 4 years. I know a smattering of Unix commands and even armed with that I still can't ever seem to get a program downloaded and working like I can with windows. I'm looking forward to trying it again before I make the move to DeMudi.

    --
    Is there heaven? Is there Hell? Is that a Tuna Melt I smell?-Primus
    1. Re:Time to try Linux (again) by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Please try a few flavours of Linux. At least try Ubuntu's Live CD (GNOME based) as well as Knoppix (KDE based). To really love Linux you've gotta find the distribution that is "right for you".

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:Time to try Linux (again) by fohat · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the response. I've been toying with the idea of a Mac and will have to give it some more thought.

      One application that I found recently through a friends school project, is Audacity and was quite amazed. One reason I started leaning towards Linux is due to the fact that this software seems to have many more Linux plugins then Windows based.

      Stability is certainly a major factor and one to reckon with it would seem...

      --
      Is there heaven? Is there Hell? Is that a Tuna Melt I smell?-Primus
    3. Re:Time to try Linux (again) by rco3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's not true. Ardour may not be DP4, but it certainly is acceptable for certain recording situations. Less-than-optimal, yes. Certainly. Less-than-user-friendly, yeah. Undoubtedly. And, as you said, it is showing a lot of promise. But utterly unacceptable? No. I've used it and a whole slew of LADSPA plugins to do some nice remixes of material I recorded for a personal album about 10 years ago. Sounds fine, works well enough. I gotta tell you, it's amazing how many tracks and plugins you can get operating on an Athlon 64 without even approaching cpu overload. And for me, in my situation, Ardour is much more useful than GarageBand, even if GarageBand is easier to use.

      I'm not disagreeing with your basic premise that Linux music production has a long way to go. I'm simply disagreeing with your statement that all Linux audio software is utterly unacceptable for any type of music recording, and I base that on my experience. YMMV.

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    4. Re:Time to try Linux (again) by Quino · · Score: 2, Interesting

      check out

      http://www.dynebolic.org/

      it's a linux live cd that comes with audacity and other tools for multimedia editing/broadcasting etc.

      Unless your hardware is exotic, you should just be able to boot and use the software you're interested in.

      Be warned that it comes with a more lightweight desktop, but it's probably the easiest way to try out audacity yourself, IMHO.

    5. Re:Time to try Linux (again) by fohat · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the url! Another torrent for the que ;)

      --
      Is there heaven? Is there Hell? Is that a Tuna Melt I smell?-Primus
    6. Re:Time to try Linux (again) by xsspd2004 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm a friggin' moron and I can install Linux, DRUNK! Try PC Linux OS 2k4 PR8.

      --
      This is not an illusion, a rip-off, or a ninja technique!
    7. Re:Time to try Linux (again) by fohat · · Score: 1

      Oh I can install it just fine. It's the whole compiling source code/lack of easy ways to install applications that I had a rough time with.

      Actually your suggestion did in fact boot on my Gateway x700 while knoppix 3.7 did not. I haven't burned the CeBit version yet as I'm still sharing ;)

      --
      Is there heaven? Is there Hell? Is that a Tuna Melt I smell?-Primus
    8. Re:Time to try Linux (again) by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      apt-get install foo, is too hard for you?

      Debian and enough HE can solve all of lifes problems.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    9. Re:Time to try Linux (again) by rufus+t+firefly · · Score: 1
      The software that is available currently is utterly unacceptable for any type of music recording.
      Before the knee-jerk reaction, try looking around a little. Agnula has both Debian and Redhat based live CDs loaded with professional audio applications, which work out of the box.

      Also, the results you get using JACK + Ardour + Hydrogen + Jamin are comperable, if not superior, to available commercial solutions. (Well, assuming that you're using professional hardware ... )

      not having your entire plugin system crash on you is another.
      It sounds like you had a sour experience. I have never had a LADSPA plugin crash anything on my studio box.
      In a nutshell: The features are not there, the stability is not there, the usability is not there, and the overall effectiveness of the applications is just not there.
      Grab a copy of the DeMuDi Live CD and try saying any of those things.
      --
      "He may look like an idiot, and talk like an idiot, but don't let that fool you. He really is an idiot." - Duck Soup
    10. Re:Time to try Linux (again) by m50d · · Score: 1

      There are many better live CDs than knoppix, seriously, it just gets the most attention. Try one of the ones dedicated to multimedia.

      --
      I am trolling
    11. Re:Time to try Linux (again) by SammyTheSnake · · Score: 1

      To install software on Knoppix (or Ubuntu, or Gnoppix, or any other of the squillions of Debian based distributions, liveCD or otherwise) the procedure is something like the following:

      1. check the configuration of /etc/apt/sources.list - usually the default is perfectly sensible, but you may want to add things like the aGnula project for music software (see http://www.agnula.org)
      2. "apt-get update" to make sure your computer is up to date with the latest versions of everything - no need to do this every time, but you should be keeping up with the security patches and if you're tracking testing or unstable you should do it at least once every couple of days
      3. "apt-get install mygroovypackage" to install the package, you may be asked a variety of configuration questions depending on the package, many install without any interactive input.
      4. enjoy your groovynewsoftware

      If you don't know the name of the package you want to install (often they can be guessed, but not always) then consider using one of the many front-ends like dselect (hardcore, a little old fashioned) aptitude (prettier, but still text based), or whatever others here will suggest.

      HTH
      Cheers & God bless
      Sam "SammyTheSnake" Penny

    12. Re:Time to try Linux (again) by mz2 · · Score: 1

      For audio use I've found the easiest&overall best combination to be Ubuntu (Hoary) with some audio-related packages from Sid and some from DeMudi. For example Ardour beta releases for the last few months have normally been packaged into the Sid repository within days, sometimes hours, from the release.

      And this all is really easy and flashy to use and administer thanks to the brilliant Ubuntu :)

    13. Re:Time to try Linux (again) by rco3 · · Score: 1

      thanks.

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
  15. Re:I have that, too by datafr0g · · Score: 2, Insightful

    free, is it?

    --
    "Who says nothing is impossible? Some people do it every day!" - Alfred E. Neuman
  16. Re:Great, But... by jacksonyee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're right about Knoppix not needing an installation process, but in the case of naive Windows users, even asking them to reboot can be a scary concept for them.

    The other case where I can see this being useful is when you're trying to demonstrate Knoppix to someone and they already have work running on their Windows desktop - spreadsheets, telnet sessions, and things of that nature. If they can see Linux running within a window, they'll be much more likely to play around with it since they know that they can just click a close box and return to their normal routine whenever they want.

    It may not work for everyone, but for those people who this can influence, I see nothing wrong with extra shiny things to attract the naive.

  17. beowulf by xmp_phrack · · Score: 1, Redundant

    what about a Beowulf cluster of these?

    1. Re:beowulf by vonsneerderhooten · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Cluster Knoppix has been around for a while, i think i have some releases dating 2001-2002, and i noticed that the torrent tracker the poster linked to hosts the .torrent for the current release of Cnoppix. 12-04 IIRC.
      A side note: being that the poster was smart enough to link to a torrent tracker in the story, I'm interested to see just how big this torrent will get, as i speak, the tracker lists over 800 hosts, 200+ seeds and over 600 leechers. The largest torrent i've ever seen was on bt.etree.org with something like 400 seeds and 700 or so leechers. That was last year. Any other /.ers able to recall some larger torrents?

    2. Re:beowulf by chrislees · · Score: 1

      Largest torrent? When Doom 3 came out, the largest torrent had 12,000 peers and 1,000 seeds

      --
      "I work outa the home"
    3. Re:beowulf by chrislees · · Score: 1

      :p one minute behind my post.

      --
      "I work outa the home"
    4. Re:beowulf by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      Largest torrent? When Doom 3 came out,

      You're talking about the demo, right? Please be talking about the demo.

    5. Re:beowulf by taylortbb · · Score: 1

      Oceans 12 had ~600 seeders and ~4000 peers about 1 week ago. Other than that never seen anything above 60/400.

    6. Re:beowulf by ScytheBlade1 · · Score: 1

      Oh dear no. The retail version.

      iirc the seeds reached in excess of 1.5k, usually up until the morning when about 700 happy people hit the stop button and started playing.

      Note that it maintained this size for a good week, at least.

    7. Re:beowulf by Dizzle · · Score: 1

      Torrents for the OC usually reach about 2000/4000. The big TV shows right now get huge stats like that. Desperate Housewives, Lost, heck, even the Daily Show all typically do 500/1300 or so.

      --
      -Dizzle
      "I most likely AM so interested in myself."
  18. Re:WTF? by MasterB(G)ates · · Score: 1

    It is all about migration paths from windows to linux. Linux is easier to demonstrate to bosses/CTOs this way rather than rebooting.

    --
    In the Slashdot moderating system, humourless based offenses are considered especially heinous.
  19. Re:Great, But... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How do you explain to your friend/relative whos computer is configured to NOT boot from cd to change their BIOS settings?

    I agree though, Live eval cds are invaluable, and are preferable to running a slower emulated environment, but this cd allows both options, so why not say its a good thing?

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  20. Re:Great, But... by timeOday · · Score: 1

    I don't think running under an emulator off a CDROM will give the best impression of linux speed!

  21. Re:WTF? by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    If your clever you should be able to page out windows, and boot the linux kernel warm.

    I think that's more or less what VMWare does.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  22. what about coLinux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From the reports I've seen, qemu is VERY slow. Is there an advantage to qemu over coLinux? I've been using coLinux to give me Linux under Windows for about a year now, and there is a lot to be said for native execution speed. You also get networking, and recently easy access of the native Windows filesystems without employing samba-type file sharing.

    Of course, it's difficult to deny the power of running a gameboy emulator on a GBA emulator on a Linux emulator on a Windows emulator on your Mac...

    1. Re:what about coLinux? by cduffy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      From the reports I've seen, qemu is VERY slow. Is there an advantage to qemu over coLinux?

      Sure, even when you restrict it to the presently relevant set of cases (x86/Linux inside x86/Win32): coLinux has no (non-experimental) framebuffer support; the experimental version that does exist has its performance measured in seconds per frame. The only way to run X is by having an X server on your Windows box, and you can't run Qt/E or GtkFB or such at all. If you want to do embedded systems development, this can be a substantial issue.

      If you don't restrict yourself to that subset of cases, then QEMU wins on account of having support for far more than just a custom build of the Linux kernel. (Want to play with FreeDOS? Test your new build of of GRUB? Run through the SLES9 installer? The first two of these simply aren't possible in coLinux, and the 3rd one requires a lot of work to make it happen).

      Also, COFS is so experimental/unstable I'm not sure I'd claim it as a feature yet.

    2. Re:What about CoLinux? by isny · · Score: 1

      Man, I read that as topogigolinux. Come to think about it, that would be an awesome distribution name.

    3. Re:what about coLinux? by tchuladdiass · · Score: 1

      You can also do X via vnc with colinux. Actually, I was thinking of putting together a knoppix/colinux disk that uses modified cygwin/x and/or vnc (cygwin would need to be modified so that it doesn't need registry entries)

    4. Re:what about coLinux? by nxtw · · Score: 1
      You can also do X via vnc with colinux.

      That's hardly an improvment over running an X server on Windows; it's more of a disadvantage. VNC is relatively slow compared to other protocols (you can deny this all you want, but X itself or RDP tend to perform better than VNC).

      This does not resolve the parent post's complaint about the lack of a framebuffer. However, coLinux is perfectly usable for many people without a framebuffer. At any rate.. I bet coLinux would be faster than QEMU, even running over VNC. (Administrators membership would be required to install the coLinux driver and use some types of networking connections in either case.)

    5. Re:what about coLinux? by Cronopios · · Score: 1

      The only way to run X is by having an X server on your Windows box
      Not really. I tried VNC, and it works quite ok. Unfortunately I had some problems with accented characters (á, é and such).

      At the end, I installed FreeNX on my Debian image, and the free (as in beer) No Machine NX client on Windows. The performance is great, although I still have a couple of glitches with my keyboard.
      --
      Windows users:
      Internet Explorer is obsolete. Please upgrade to Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.
  23. Virtualization by chronicon · · Score: 1
    Because, virtulization is the wave and this is an easy first step for the home user (and others) to get a taste.

    Hence the hype surrounding Novell shipping Xen in the next version of SuSE...

  24. Re:I have that, too by gnuman99 · · Score: 1

    If you have an MSDN Universal Subscription, then yes, it is "free"

  25. OP has a torrent by grendel_x86 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Holy crap!!! the Poster actually linked a .torrent, maybe all the complaining actually got somewhere.

    Now only if others would follow.

    --
    Im glad /. isnt the real world, that would really suck..
    1. Re:OP has a torrent by xyphor · · Score: 1

      I got 10kbps down, peaked at 10 going out, then it died. I'm getting 0 down and 1 up. Slashdot Effect on a seed server?

    2. Re:OP has a torrent by Danathar · · Score: 1

      I'm uploading at over 1MB/s and only getting 100K/s downstream. Acording to the stats there are NO seeds but lots of peers. Usually that means that the entire torrent is being held up because at least one complete copy has not been downloaded.

      Once multiple seeds exist things will pick up consideribly.

    3. Re:OP has a torrent by grendel_x86 · · Score: 1

      I usually share 5x what i take. But seeders can get /.ed. Remember there are a few thousand people trying to get some data from 10 people or so in the begining. The more seeders, the more it balances out.

      as of 10:30 CST, 34 seeders, 1898 peers. Im getting 51KB/s down, 19KB/s up.

      --
      Im glad /. isnt the real world, that would really suck..
    4. Re:OP has a torrent by 1000StonedMonkeys · · Score: 1

      People like you are the reason why a lot of the rest of us are getting good speeds. Thanks.

    5. Re:OP has a torrent by Danathar · · Score: 1

      Thanks!

      The people who I work for have two load balanced T3's and an OC3 to Internet 2 (90Mb/s + 150 Mb/s) for about 200 people. They don't mind as long as it's nothing illegal (plus I want to keep my job!)

      It's sort of fun watching the torrent statistics.

    6. Re:OP has a torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I was downloading from work and I left it on over night..

      check these stats

      saving: KNOPPIX_V3.8-2005-02-28-CeBIT_Edition-qemu-0.6.1-2 .iso (699.1 MB)
      percent done: 100
      time left: Download Succeeded!
      download to: /home/gunit/bittorrent/KNOPPIX_V3.8-2005-02-28-CeB IT_Edition-qemu-0.6.1-2.iso
      upload rate: 1,138.85 kB/s
      download total: 699.0 MiB
      upload total: 36,001.3 MiB

      Yeah, thats right.. uploaded 36,000 MB in about 8 hours at 1MB/s.

  26. VMWare by F1_Fan · · Score: 4, Funny

    I like booting Knoppix in VMWare! Same concept.

    1. Re:VMWare by F1_Fan · · Score: 1

      True, it's not free but really how many people here pay for software ;) For the record my copy of VMWare is legal. Anyhoo, booting from the CD-ROM is doable. Hit the power button on any VMWare virtual machine (after making the virtual CD-ROM bootable in VMWare's BIOS) and it'll find the CD and start booting.

    2. Re:VMWare by Oriumpor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Who's joking? I haven't seen a faster way to get a working test virtualization setup than mounting a Bootable OS ISO (eg: knoppix/slax).

  27. Re:Great, But... by WarmBoota · · Score: 4, Funny
    [quote]but in the case of naive Windows users, even asking them to reboot can be a scary concept for them[/quote]

    Oh the horror of rebooting a windows machine!!! I'd say that it's akin to the terror of sleep, but sleep only comes once a day

    --
    90% of everything is crap. Also, crap is relative.
  28. Mirrors by Shachaf · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's the Coral Cache and the Mirrordot Mirror.

  29. Deutsch edition? by cvdwl · · Score: 1

    Anyone know if the torrent is the German version KNOPPIX? Been holding out on trying remastering and USB install until this came out, but my high-school german is fairly rusty.

    --
    ... grumble, grumble, grumble, mutter, mutter, Millenium... Hand... Shrimp, I tol' 'em, I tol' 'em.
    1. Re:Deutsch edition? by quanticle · · Score: 1

      It says in the forum post that the windows version defaults to english.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    2. Re:Deutsch edition? by cvdwl · · Score: 1
      1) Why the heck would I want to boot Knoppix from Windows?

      2) It's german, and, as someone pointed out, the "=" is shift-0

      3) It doesn't support my laptop's trackpad.

      --
      ... grumble, grumble, grumble, mutter, mutter, Millenium... Hand... Shrimp, I tol' 'em, I tol' 'em.
  30. news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    how is this news? some guy put in qemu to a distro and this makes it to slashdot?
    I got news damnsmall linux has been doing this for sometime now in an "embeded" download to test out the distribution in windows. Running linux inside of windows at 1/10 normal speed isn't gonna make people switch over to linux any faster....

  31. What about CoLinux? by ZehFernando · · Score: 5, Informative

    CoLinux is also a very handy package for running linux on windows. It installs linux on a single file on your HD, then runs linux on it, and you can access it throught VNC. So you can have windows and linux sharing the same machine and HD, running at the same time, on different windows. Pretty handy.

    http://www.colinux.org

    You can use it to run linux from some other partition too. It comes with a version of debian built it, but there are other packages for other distros.

    You can also try topologilinux.

    http://wwwtopologilinux.com

    It's a bundled installation of coLinux and slackware with all bells and whistles.

  32. Re:I have that, too by CypherXero · · Score: 1

    Actually, it is for me. I'm a IT Major in college, and we're partnered with the MSDNAA, so I get a lot of Microsoft products for free.

  33. Audio Linux ((Time to try Linux (again)) by chronicon · · Score: 2, Informative
    SuSE has a customized LiveCD based on 9.2 with audio as the focus. It worked well on all the boxen I have booted it. You can find it here or on one of the mirrors.

    I'm hoping they will release it as an installable distro at some point. The demo scripts worked great for patching different applications through jackd w/ ALSA. Very cool.

  34. Re:OT: www.oliverthered.f2s.com by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    Ummm.. it's standards complient XHTML and CSS 2, it should render ok if Firefox, Mozilla, Netscape, Opera, Konqueror, whatever ships with the mac.

    IE is probably picking the brail and screenreader or largefont CSS, which funnnly enough has large text, a small menu at the top and the main menu at the bottom.

    If there's a setting in IE that lets you select the style sheet to apply main.css

    Apart from that I may add IE7 to the site in an attempt to fix IE.

    Why are you using IE if you have firefox?

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  35. Re:Great, But... by peculiarmethod · · Score: 2, Interesting

    but the wireless communications that carry the code for this software will propigate into space forever.. your puny mountain will only last until our Sun runs out of hydrogen and helium.

    --
    ** "It's not my job to stand between the people talking to me, and the ones listening to me." -- Pego the Jerk
  36. Don't like it? by neypo · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Don't use it.

    This CD wasen't setup just to see how many people he could piss off.

    This in my opinion will be great to friends who still are incapable of going to the BIOS and changing it to boot from the CD-ROM.

  37. Re:OT: www.oliverthered.f2s.com by quanticle · · Score: 1

    Looks ok in Firefox though.


    That's all that matters then...

    --
    We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
  38. Re:They have something better: by oliverthered · · Score: 3, Funny

    'Seriously linux users, you're operating system wont make up for the fact that girls are repulsed by your bodies.'

    That's ok, I'm gay.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  39. Re:Great, But... by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Insightful

    but in the case of naive Windows users, even asking them to reboot can be a scary concept for them.

    Hmm, I think you're exaggerating a bit... Windows users should (and I'm not even joking) be quite used to booting and rebooting their systems. Even my mom would understand the implications of restarting the computer.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  40. Torrent... by CODiNE · · Score: 1

    Currently 9 seeds and 542 peers, this is a good test of torrent scalability. Even if it takes a while to ramp up, this would kill just about any server on the net, kind of amazing how any of this works at all. :-)

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    1. Re:Torrent... by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      You know, i have seen naruto torrents with 10000 seeds and 25000 peers and no problem.
      Just like with http, you need a strong enough server. If you have your tracker on a dsl line running on a via c3, not even bittorrent will be able to help you.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  41. This allows dual-use of both Windows and KNOPPIX by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    without the need to reboot. Run them side by side and compare the features.

    It is, after all, emulation, so don't expect to break speed records with it. Also that IP connection limitation in XP won't be broken by running KNOPPIX in an emulator.

    Now KNOPPIX can join the ranks of MacOS 8.1 (BasiliskII), AmigaOS 3.1 (Amiga Forever), as yet another OS emulated under Windows.

    The advantage I see for this is that web developers will finally be able to check how their web pages look under different browsers and operating systems without having to reboot Windows each time they want to look how it looks under Linux.

    The next step is to make KNOPPIX run AntiVirus, AntiSpyware, AntiAdware, and AntiTrojan removal programs and make any FAT32, FAT16, or NTFS partition as read/write so the Malware can be removed. Yet what is the point when you can run the KNOPPIX HD Install script and get rid of Windows and all of its flaws that allow Malware to be installed in the first place.

    P.S. I am moving to KANOTIX now, it seems to be a bit better than KNOPPIX.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  42. Re:Great, But... by Gherald · · Score: 1

    > but in the case of naive Windows users, even asking them to reboot can be a scary concept for them.

    You have GOT to be kidding. Rebooting is the first thing Windows users learn how to do properly!

  43. Re:Time to try Linux (again) / Audio Solutions by fohat · · Score: 1

    I was not aware of auppix, thanks for the link!

    --
    Is there heaven? Is there Hell? Is that a Tuna Melt I smell?-Primus
  44. Are they insane? by Guspaz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    QEMU is an EMULATOR. They want to demo linux to windows users running under a full blown emulator? I can see it now. "This lunix thing looks nice, but it's just so SLOW!".

    They're going to end up convincing dumb windows users that Linux is slow as hell!

    Before you say anything, keep in mind that they are running QEMU on windows, and the QEMU virtualizer is closed-source and linux only. So they can ONLY do full emulation.

    1. Re:Are they insane? by jhoger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      a) QEMU is all open source. A small part recently added is non-free but still open-source.
      b) QEMU is the fastest (99%) Free emulator, and QEMU is getting faster all the time. There is a strong emphasis on speed by Fabrice
      c) Yes Knoppix will run slower under emulation than natively, and Knoppix doesn't run as fast as a native Linux install. But there are obvious speedups laying around. This looks like a first cut by some developer.

      But I think there is one obvious case where this can be useful, in the particular situation where a machine is locked down so that you can't boot install CDs without a password, and the user does not have admin priveleges. Also, it may be useful for users who aren't willing to boot a Linux CD since they are afraid that it will wipe something out.

    2. Re:Are they insane? by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 2, Funny

      They're going to end up convincing dumb windows users that Linux is slow as hell!

      Of course, Knoppix already did this, because running and booting from a live cd is painfully slow anyhow. So now the slowness will double (unless it just cancels out, such as by the IO delays happening in parrellel with the CPU emulation lag, somehow)

    3. Re:Are they insane? by interiot · · Score: 1

      Z) Wait 6 months, shell out a bit of cash, and have a fully open-source virtualizer that runs significantly faster.

    4. Re:Are they insane? by jhoger · · Score: 2, Informative

      How about not waiting and getting to work on QEMU?

      QEMU has the right emphasis from the beginning. To make something that is fast and usable.

      And that's what it is, on several platforms. It's got the momentum, why divide up resources? QEMU will run on more platforms, and is getting the same virtualization goodies as Xen. The tiny virtualization kernel is open source but non-free till Fabrice can get some funding, but have some faith based on his entire body of Free software contributions that it will also become free.

      -- John.

    5. Re:Are they insane? by interiot · · Score: 1
      I don't know... As much as I like to root for the underdog, references like AMD, Intel, IBM, and "6 million dollars" make Xen seem pretty alluring to me.

      Also, from a technical perspective, aren't there concerns over how secure virtualized machines can be on 2004-era x86 machines?

      • "We conclude that current VMM products for the Intel architecture should not be used as a secure virtual machine monitor.
      • ... Slight modifications to the processor would significantly facilitate development of a highly secure Type I VMM."

      So, if you're on x86, you really want the upgraded hardware support anyway, to be able to be protected much more from webserver break-ins or just random untrusted software.
    6. Re:Are they insane? by jhoger · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oops... re-read the QEMU site, KQEMU is non-free and closed source. I took away something from KQEMU discussion that was incorrect.

      But the intent as stated by Fabrice is to get sponsorship so that eventually KQEMU can eventually be Free. So, essentially KQEMU module is a kind of ransomware.

      -- John.

    7. Re:Are they insane? by GoRK · · Score: 1

      Depending on how much cash you are actually willing to shell out, you could also fund QEMU and get the virtualization module open-sourced!

    8. Re:Are they insane? by stevey · · Score: 1

      But which requires the operating system to be modified to work upon it - meaning that you cannot install arbitary OSs, like you can with Qemu.

      I've installed Windows 2000 on a Qemu system before and found its speed acceptible - I can't do that with Xen...

    9. Re:Are they insane? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the x86 should handle virtualization just fine, as long as the operating systems don't need to run in ring 0.

      The main problem with the x86 is that a process is either privileged or not - there is only really a two-level heirarchy.

      I guess the best system would be one with arbitrary levels of privs.

      You could just add one more level and that would make the VMMs secure. However, it would make the platform unsuitable for VMMMs by the same argument, and consequently we'll need a platform which is better still, just in case you want to run windows and linux under linux, and then run linux under that windows and windows under that linux. However, that still won't help if you want to run windows under linux under windows under linux... :)

    10. Re:Are they insane? by interiot · · Score: 1
      Ahh, I think you are correct, sir! Paravirtualization, where you recompile the guest OS, can, if you you make the guest OS happy to always run under ring 1, be secure, I think you're correct.

      The Usenix paper I quoted I guess only examines only the Binary Translation way of doing things, where the VMM has to share Ring0 with the guest OS, but as you point out, that's not required with Paravirtualization.

      You don't need an arbitrary number of levels necessarily, unless end-user use-cases require it. Many processrs have securely supported VMM in hardware for a while, and have done it with more minimal changes. In particular, the new x86 changes from Intel and AMD seem fairly minimal. The Usenix paper goes through the details of which specific processer instructions have problems, and suggested fixes for each of them, so it gives a good perspective of this.

    11. Re:Are they insane? by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Thats all nice, but i started booting on my xp2000 with 1gb ram 10 minutes ago and its still at the KDE splashscreen...
      In that form, its more like a anti-ad "dont use that slow crap" instead of a way to make linux more popular.

      Also, why a fullblown emulator? Windows is only on x86, so there should be ways around that...

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    12. Re:Are they insane? by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      QEMU might be the fastest emulator, but it's still a full-system emulator. According to the QEMU site, QEMU runs emulated systems at 5x to 10x slower than native (That's 10% to 20% of native speed). That's still extremely slow compared to a virtualized solutions.

      I quote a child post:

      "but i started booting on my xp2000 with 1gb ram 10 minutes ago and its still at the KDE splashscreen..."

      That kind of speed will certainly convince any Windows user that Linux is a horrible slow PoS. That's not the kind of publicity it needs.

      Surely there is some win32 opensource virtualization app out there that could be used instead?

    13. Re:Are they insane? by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Knoppix was slower than native, but it was nothing compared to the 10% to 20% of native speed that QEMU gives you. And of course throw the Knoppix slowdown on top of that...

    14. Re:Are they insane? by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      What else should I call them? Technologically challeneged? Ability impaired? How would you like me to describe what the rest of the world would call "dumb users"? Keep in mind I'm not referring to all Windows users, but the subset of them that are dumb. But I guess you didn't figure that out.

      Idiot.

  45. www.knoppix.net by deutschemonte · · Score: 2, Interesting

    knoppix.net is really slow and the forum is /.'ed, people must be storming that site with this news out.

    Is this this the first time a site has been /.'ed but not posted on slashdot? I mean, no direct link, everyone just goes there themselves.

    I christen it, the slashdot halo effect.

    --
    The preceding message was based on actual events. Only the names, locations and events have been changed.
    1. Re:www.knoppix.net by gtoomey · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mark the parent as moronic, not interesting. Knoppix.net is one of the links in the story.

  46. Re:Great, But... by kdark1701 · · Score: 1

    People need some proof that it really is better.

    This isn't intended to be a troll; but Windows is better for some things, like playing games.

  47. Knoppix on Windows by jhoger · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Following the QEMU list, this was done some time back by a Japanese developer Kuniyasu Suzaki I believe.

    Discussions ensued about how to make it faster... some patches are available to directly mount the compressed Knoppix volume so that portion doesn't need to be emulated. Also, the SaveVM feature was improved, so rather than boot knoppix, just keep a compressed VM ram image on the Knoppix CD. That makes it boot instantaneously.

    QEMU is the fastest thing going as far as Free emulators, given more improvements on the virtualization side, I think this will be *the* way to run Knoppix for Windows users that just want to try it out. The speed will come in time.

    Some of us pushed for features like User Mode Networking in QEMU just for this purpose. Windows users in larger corporations often do not have administrator level rights, so they can't install any special drivers. So Knoppix under QEMU can get right to the net on any Windows box that will run a .EXE from CD.

    -- John.

    1. Re:Knoppix on Windows by idlake · · Score: 1

      QEMU is the fastest thing going as far as Free emulators, given more improvements on the virtualization side, I think this will be *the* way to run Knoppix for Windows users that just want to try it out. The speed will come in time.

      No, I think the way will be CoLinux, which already runs a lot faster than QEMU, and which will (in upcoming releases) give far better integration with the host OS.

      QEMU is useful for lots of purposes, but for running Linux under Windows, coLinux is a better tool in my experience.

  48. Re:OT: www.oliverthered.f2s.com by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    I'll think about building the site in html just for those people still using IE6.

    If I had the source code to IE6 I would consider fixing the problem.

    IE accounts for 12.5% this of this months visitors
    1 28456 77.02% Mozilla/5.0
    2 4705 12.73% MSIE 6.0
    and less 9% for the month before
    1 42064 77.66% Mozilla/5.0
    2 4689 8.66% Konqueror/3.3
    3 4609 8.51% MSIE 6.0

    This assumes that all browsers are reporting the correct version.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  49. Re:Great, But... by quanticle · · Score: 1

    Hey, I take naps, and admit it you sometimes take naps too...

    --
    We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
  50. Re:OT: www.oliverthered.f2s.com by grolschie · · Score: 1

    Why are you using IE if you have firefox?

    I can't live without ActiveX.... just kidding! hmm.... I'm kinda used to the IE interface - habit I guess. Been using it for years, since I never liked Netscape. Also, Firefox doesn't *seem* as snappy. On slower machines it takes ages to start up.

  51. Re:OT: www.oliverthered.f2s.com by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    there a preloader for firefox.

    and there are light weight versions of firefox about that can run on portable devices.

    There's also an IE themed firefox

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  52. Getting close... by smug_lisp_weenie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Now all they need to do is add the following ability to make it perfect:

    1. Allow people to apt-get packages while the CD is running. Then...
    2. Import user files from Win into a Knoppix-side directory. Finally...
    3. (this is the important one) Press a button and presto! The system builds an ISO of original winknoppix+packages+userfiles that is a no-fuss super-customized knoppix CD!

    If they could make that... then a seamless transition to Linux goodness would finally be within reach for everyone!

    1. Re:Getting close... by Jaffa · · Score: 2
      My own Salvare is designed to fit into 34MB (the size of the credit-card sized CD-RWs I've got) - and is currently 20MB. The best feature, IMNSHO, is the ability to
      apt-get update && apt-get install foo
      from the running CD into tmpfs. Of course, you can also free the CD, rescue systems etc. etc.
    2. Re:Getting close... by gmatyola · · Score: 1


      You should check out the changelog and/or read up about the new UNIONfs.

  53. Re:Great, But... by tropicdog · · Score: 1

    The point I am going with is to shut the M$ fanboys up at the place I work. They think they are pretty spiffy with their crudely slapped together version of Bart's PE they made recently. Although handy, and practical for working on borked Windows formatted hard drives only, it's basically useless beyond that. They stood with their mouths gaping open when they saw me runnning Damn Small Linux off a mini-disc and with all it can do, this should get a good reaction as well. Running Linux while in a Windows session AND being able to have access to the many tools/apps available on Knoppix/Linux that absolutley kick Win apps all to heck will be satisfying. *I'm stuck in DeactiveDirectory Hell with a bunch of flaming fanboys, well, except for that 1 Linux savvy apps developer a couple of cubes away. I carry a disk folder full of various live cd distros to help me save the day in recovering "lost" data, sniff out malicious network traffic and other tasks the M$ fanboys can't even begin to touch with their so-called "tools". I'm grabbing the torrent and will keep it going as long as I can.

  54. slowness /w BT ~= router lack of configuration by Phil+Urich · · Score: 3, Informative

    That's . . . very, very odd. I've often been able to max out my bandwidth with torrents (though not nowadays, considering that I'm at the university residence . . . faster even than my prior aDSL, true, but if I let it go, I'd break my weekly download/upload limits damn quickly!). There are many things that could be going wrong. One of the problems often encountered, which is the most likely cause since I've seen similar same symptoms on many a computer, is your router. Part of the reason I've never had to care is 'cause I've eskewed routers; I hate them, I reallly do. But if you're using one, and getting crappy speeds using BitTorrent, this may very well be it, so just read up on the solution here. Hope that works for ya.

    --
    I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
  55. Re:WTF? by jhoger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Stability of Linux is only a small part of the story. But you're not right anyway. An emulator is a nice cozy environment for an OS. It should be more stable there than running natively.

    The bigger advantage for users is the number of applications freely available for Linux.

    What comes with a new Windows machine? Usually a lot of "lite" versions of various payware. Word processor, maybe. Eventually the system gets hosed and even those may be lost.

    I don't think most users have any idea what it's like to think "I wish I had a program that did ____" and then apt-cache search'ing for it 3 or 4 programs that do it ready to be downloaded...

    And Knoppix has a lot of stuff just available in the menus right off the bat. Just give the users the caveat that, yeah, this isn't going to be real fast, but it will give you an idea of what is available.

  56. Re:This allows dual-use of both Windows and KNOPPI by RoTNCoRE · · Score: 1

    Amen. I work in the tech department of a big-box store, and spyware/virus removal is the majority of what I see. I use BartPE, but it feels like it's trying to be Knoppix. And it would be useful, because most people aren't willing/knowledgable enough to make the switch, because they don't want to lose support for their card games, and if something went wrong, finding someone who knew linux well enough to fix it would be tough.

  57. Very handy to have. by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have used DSL (Damn Small Linux) before and been able to use it on some users machine to log in to the server quickly with my SSH keys all setup on the key. When I am done, I kill it. I love this because I can use it on any machine I have and be able to test scripts and such on my machine without risking any of the stuff on the local machine. Will it run slow? Yeah, but if you have a ton of RAM and speedy processor(preferably 1 GHz or faster) it should run just fine.

    --

    Gorkman

  58. Naw... by SaDan · · Score: 2, Informative

    I just started a torrent, and I'm already over 12KB/s.

    Yes, I'm sharing too.. 16KB/s up is my limit for torrents (384K DSL uplink).

  59. sounds useful, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    My college has no dedicated linux computers, but has spent an obscene amount of money on Dells with WinXP. This makes the linux class I'm in a little more annoying than it needs to be. The best part is that there's a problem with the Dell's bios, so that every version of linux I've tried on them runs at 640x480 (no amount of screwing with xf86 settings helped). With the Knoppix on Windows, there's a chance I'll be able to run linux there at a reasonable resolution.

    Also could useful if you need to access the internet in linux, but have a wireless or winmodem card not supported in linux. Or at least I hope that's the case.

    1. Re:sounds useful, actually by ABeowulfCluster · · Score: 1

      I assume you've tried running linux with some command parameters thrown at it. linux vga=1 you can google 'knoppix cheatcodes' or the vga codes.

  60. Re:OT: www.oliverthered.f2s.com by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

    That's all that matters then...

    Especially given that his link title is only applicable to platforms with no native IE.

    --
    Everything will be taken away from you.
  61. Re:WTF? by pg110404 · · Score: 1

    Actually, what VMWare does is to give up a block of physical ram on guest vm power on, locking it down and then doing some clever tricks with virtual memory mapping.

    As long as the guest os thinks it's running in protected mode, it really is, and even when it thinks it's in non protected mode (as in kernel mode), it still is and any accesses outside what's been afforded for it via the virtual memory manager gets trapped translated and emulated via host os level drivers.

    VMware emulates a BX (if I remember correctly) chipset and it appears to be running on a motherboard of the P2 era. All devices are also emulated.

    It might be possible to page windows out and 'warm boot' into linux, but paging windows back in after linux is done would be problematic at best, not to mention with windows even temporarily out of the way linux could decide not to give control back to windows, in which case it would be a complicated one-way context switcher, rather than a platform emulator.

    My computer has dual boot linux and windows, but it's running linux 99% of the time and for the odd windows stuff I start a VMWare session with a secondary copy of windows loaded to do my stuff. Linux still runs and is still in charge of everything, all it does is sacrifice HD space and access, some ram temporarily and cpu cycles. Even then however, there's a definite performance hit through the emulator, and though it might be good enough for the odd thing, it's not that great for any serious stuff and impossible for some things (games).

    As for carrying on why specifically this winos+qemu+knoppix would be of any use, I'll just shut up now in case I might get modded down to redundant again.

  62. Oh Yeah... by mathmatt · · Score: 1

    Use Shareaza to handle your torrents:

    Currently: 30KB/s down, 6KB/s up

    1. Re:Oh Yeah... by TheKarateMaster · · Score: 1

      Uhh, no. That means you have a faster internet connection :)

      Actually, I'm not sure. My connection is certainly capable of at least 200, but I'm only getting 60-something with bittorrent 4.0. I guess it's *possible* that azureus is better, although I find this unlikely.

  63. non-torrent? by zardie · · Score: 1

    My workplace won't let me download torrents. We have an anal Network Access Control Policy that not only blocks the ports that bittorrent requires (on a globally routable subnet) but we have snort configured to detect any use of bittorrent. Peer-to-peer applications (all) are banned under our IT access policy and if it's detected, we get our network port disabled.

    Is there an FTP or non-P2P method of which I can grab this file?

    1. Re:non-torrent? by logical1010 · · Score: 1

      Ah, just deliver an unmarked manila envelope with two 20 quid notes inside to your operations dept..

      And all will be forgiven.
      --
      There is something wonderful in seeing a wrong-headed majority assailed by truth. ~John Kenneth Galbraith
    2. Re:non-torrent? by pugdk · · Score: 1

      I concur, It would be noted in a second if I tried to download a torrent from work (where I am now). Trouble is there's no way to tell if I'm downloading legal or illegal stuff...

      Trust me, getting a call from the nazi-admins before lunch telling me my network access has been revoked pending piracy investigations are NOT the way I want to spend my day ;-)

      Someone put this on a ftp site or something? :-)

      -pug

    3. Re:non-torrent? by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      I just ssh to my linux box at home and start the download .. By the time I'm home from work the download is complete! :-) Works great with "nohup wget&" too.

    4. Re:non-torrent? by sean1121 · · Score: 1

      You can grab it off my server here

      --
      "The road from legitimate suspicion to rampant paranoia is very much shorter than we think." - Picard
  64. Does it work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just tested the disk on two different systems running a fully patched XP SP2, I get an error 3 lines in to the boot up sequence and it craps out.

  65. Off topic, but VPC by krray · · Score: 1

    Off topic, but Virtual PC, back in the day when it was still a good Connectix type product ... Yes, I did have to try.

    Those programmers DO have a sense of humor after all!
    (I wanted to see OS X run Windows to run Linux :)

    1. Re:Off topic, but VPC by Pantheraleo2k3 · · Score: 1

      Silly amateur. Layer your VMs so they only see different ones, like this.

      Mac OS -> Virtual PC -> Windows ->VMware -> Linux -> PearPC -> Mac OS X (repeat ad infinitum)

    2. Re:Off topic, but VPC by blowdart · · Score: 1
      After the rebranding the sense of humour appears to have vanished.

      (I did that especially for you)

    3. Re:Off topic, but VPC by fishbot · · Score: 1

      However, VMware (at least, VMware 2 which was the last version I ran) would not only run within itself, it would also allow you to boot the drive containing the host operating system on the virtual machine, thus providing true recursion.

      Of course, it never got as far as the desktop because the swap got all corrupt and the whole thing went to hell (both host and client) and brought the machine down before it finished booting.

  66. Re:OT: www.oliverthered.f2s.com by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    Well now that they've released this new fangled Knopix windows hybred all OS's can support native IE.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  67. Metaphor by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    for America, right there...

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  68. Somebody please explain... by Begemot · · Score: 1

    While my QA dept. would be happy to have Linux off hand w/o ghosting, I still don't get the reason for doing it.

    1. Resources: I gain nothing from running two rather heavy op. systems simultaneously.
    2. Licensing: I still need a license for Windows.
    3. Reliability: When something fails where should I seek for the reason: My software, Windows, Linux, Emulator or just the exclusive combination of all above?

    What the hell is it good for?

    1. Re:Somebody please explain... by Squarewav · · Score: 1

      It wasn't meant to be run as a full time OS that would be silly. Its more of a "because we can" type thing.

      Its not completely useless it would be good for testing cross-platform apps or web pages.

    2. Re:Somebody please explain... by m50d · · Score: 1

      Seeing the pretty KDE. Pretty pretty!

      --
      I am trolling
  69. Re:I have that, too by spac3manspiff · · Score: 1

    hmm... these warez groups keep getting creative.

  70. Re:Great, But... by ionpro · · Score: 1

    I find that 50%+ of my users (Helpdesk for a top-20 university) have late model Dells. So I tell them to hit F12 and pick CD from the boot menu

    (Usually it's to run a disk drive diagnostic though. Those before-mentioned Dells have hard disks that tend to drop like flys)

  71. don't run it from cd by quixos · · Score: 1

    mounting it with daemon tools or something should speed it up a bit. that's my plan.

  72. So does this mean... by Matilda+the+Hun · · Score: 1

    ...that Cygwin's got a replacement? One that's an actual distribution of Linux?

    --
    Tluin natha Linux xxizzuss uriu olt bwael mon'tun.
  73. Re:Great, But... by kfg · · Score: 1

    What is the point of climbing everest?

    What will we have conquered? None but ourselves. --George Mallory

    Of course the mountain won that particular round. Nevermind.

    KFG

  74. Re:Drivers? by Volvogga · · Score: 1

    Ok, I return to defend my honor (what little there is). I was not attempting a troll here. I was just wondering if I could pop in the disk on my shitty win partition and get hardware accel. I have an Ati Rage Pro on a computer I got for free. Before anyone suggests buying a new card, I might as well just buy a new computer, and I don' have the cash right now. Going back to the hardware acceleration, I don't have the time to figure it out, and would like to try tux racer and a few of the others to see if its even worth the time to do the setup on FC3. Damn! And, lastly, I agree. Once Linux is setup, its stable as all hell. Done, out, quit your bitchn'.

    --
    Vol~
  75. Re:Great, But... by MP3Chuck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, if I want to test my website Linux browsers (Konqueror comes to mind), this would be a lot nicer than rebooting. Or having another box around. Especially if all I need to do is test a browser.

    But even above and beyond that, it's nice to know that I have access to a Linux environment without having to do anything but pop in a CD.

  76. From the QEMU FAQ by subStance · · Score: 1

    Is QEMU ported to Mach OS X ?

    Hmmm ... are they making a subtle point here about the Darwin kernel's origin ?

    --
    Servlet v2.4 container in a single 161KB jar file ? Try Winstone
  77. Re:kanotix is great :) by pureone · · Score: 1

    im using it now great hd install takes 20 minutes and is just as good as debian sid if not better http://kanotix.com/

    --
    120 chars is not bloody enough for a real sig!!! you bastards even count spaces!!!
  78. Re:Drivers? by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

    Mod *this* (semi-)troll down, too. ATi cards are the best supported for Linux in my experience. Their cards will work and solong as you have a 9200 or older, you can get 3D acceleration fine. Some newer cards even have experimental 3D accel support.

    --
    Luke-Jr
  79. Re:Great, But... by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

    Rebooting is the first thing Windows users learn how to do properly!

    Actually, it doesn't usually require any interaction on their parts most of the time.

    After phoning TechSupp a few times they get the hang of it though =)

    --

    Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
  80. Re:Great, But... by SphericalCrusher · · Score: 1

    It's a very interesting hack, I agree, but it cannot be used as the swiss army knife technique that it's best for (IMO) without having to reboot Windows. After all, you can't snag that SAM file without the system being offline. It's a great way to try it out though... I just wouldn't depend on the stability of it around the Windows OS. Hopefully it won't crash and give the user a bad impression. And hopefully some Windows fan won't put some bad code to make it crash so that the user just sticks with Windows either. Heh.

    --
    "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
  81. Fine Example by OneArmedMan · · Score: 1

    This is a fine example of the good uses for Bit Torrent and similar technology.

    As I am downloading this file i see the network speed at over 25Mbytes a second

  82. Re:Drivers? by Doctor+Crumb · · Score: 1

    Or you can use binary drivers from ATI and have actual hardware acceleration (I'm using a 9600SE).

  83. Re:Drivers? by Al+Dimond · · Score: 1

    Well, in the case of this particular Knoppix CD you'll be out of luck. QEMU, which this CD uses to boot the CD under Windows, is a full-system emulator, which means it's not very fast (under Linux there's a closed-source plugin that makes QEMU virtualize the hardware instead, making it substantially faster according to people who know these things; I've never tried it myself, but it doesn't exist for Windows anyway).

    Anyway, a while ago I was playing with bochs and QEMU and I decided to try to boot Knoppix under them and it was annoyingly slow (think Windows on a crappy 486) just knockng around KDE on my three-year old Athlon 2100 box. Now that was an older version of Knoppix, but I don't think that QEMU's been updated since then. You certainly wouldn't be able to play tuxracer. I might be wrong about this, but I don't think Knoppix includes tuxracer (I don't know why tuxracer would be your test for whether Linux is worthy or not, but whatever). Or hardware rendering for that matter (at least on the version I have it doesn't seem to). But even if Knoppix includes hardware rendering you'd have to actually boot the disk instead of running it under QEMU to get anything resembling performance.

  84. Re:OT: www.oliverthered.f2s.com by FyreFiend · · Score: 1

    >....whatever ships with the mac.... Safari, which is based on the same rendering engine as Konqueror. It renders your site fine, btw

    --
    - Apple Computer......proudly going out of business for over twenty years.
  85. Re:How are the peripherals managed? by Al+Dimond · · Score: 1

    It would require a correct wireless card configuration in Windows. As it stands, QEMU emulates a network card and a network gateway...

    http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/qemu/qemu-doc.htm l# SEC19

  86. Re:Drivers? by flithm · · Score: 1

    What are you talking about? It's a well known fact that ATI drivers for Linux suck.

    nVidia is the only way to go.

  87. Re:Woohoo a torrent! by 1000StonedMonkeys · · Score: 1

    It's a pretty consistent 300-400K/s here. Try tweaking your router settings like the above poster suggests.

  88. We Are In This Together by f0rt0r · · Score: 1

    Knoppix to Windows - Now you can watch me up close, and see how stable I am. I can stay up and running for months.

    Windows to Knoppix: Um, I am carrying you now. I fall, you fall. And my uptime is approaching 24 hours...

    Knoppix( aside ) - And I wonder who thought this matchup was a good idea...

    --
    I can't afford a sig!
  89. Re:Great, But... by Calroth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...but in the case of naive Windows users, even asking them to reboot can be a scary concept for them.

    OK, people are asking why this is scary. Here's why:

    You reboot, and suddenly, all this small text in bright colours is crawling across your screen (at least, that's what Knoppix did, the last time I tried it). Your Windows environment is gone. You don't know if it's coming back, or even if it's reformatting your hard drive, that's what it's supposed to look like, right?

    Yeah, I know, this crap is irrational. But guess what, if the world was purely rational, Microsoft would have gone out of business ages ago...

    Having Knoppix run on the Windows desktop is reassuring. It lets you know that Windows is still there and you can return there at any time, and since all your icons are still on your desktop, your files must therefore be safe. Yeah, more irrational fears, sorry, but that's how many people think.

  90. Re:OT: www.oliverthered.f2s.com by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    I'm running pure XML and XSL, but I can still tell apachie to lie to IE.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  91. Re:Great, But... by kaens · · Score: 1

    More like comes more than once every other day.

  92. Re:WTF? by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    'but paging windows back in after linux is done would be problematic at best, not to mention with windows even temporarily out of the way linux could decide not to give control back to windows, in which case it would be a complicated one-way context switcher, rather than a platform emulator.'

    Do exactly what Windows does when it normall goes to sleep, page out all the memory into a file[memory, hdd, internet,printed in brail] and then page it back in again, reset a few odds and sods onthe CPU and your away.

    I would expect that the Linux software suspend extensions can be hacked to cope with a copy of Windows just as well as they do with a copy of Linux.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  93. My aunt and KNOPPIX by turgid · · Score: 1
    My aunt is doing a computing course at university. While she was at college, before uni, she'd never seen Linux, so I sent her a KNOPPIX CD.

    She refused to run it. She thouth "KNOPPIX" meant "no pics" as in "no graphics."

    I explained what it was but she still refused to try it, because all the r4d d00dz on her course told her that Linux was an abomination, unclean, and not to be let near a Windows PC. Windows was the best OS in the world, and that dodgy Linux thing might mess up your PC.

    Other attempts at Linux advocacy have also failed. I don't bother now.

    1. Re:My aunt and KNOPPIX by Johnny+Mercer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If your aunt is that stupid, the only way she'd be at university would be in a jar of formaldehyde.

    2. Re:My aunt and KNOPPIX by fd0man · · Score: 1

      That's not exactly true. Think about the people that run Corporate America. They all have gone through college and yet you don't see people being smart and implementing Linux to replace Windows. I find it kinda funny since in a few environments I have been in, in the past, have required me to have a copy of X.org or XFree86 running on Windows to run the Unix apps that I need to run... *shakes head*. If Unix is the back and and works to present the front end through a thin client, why are the workstations running Windows?! *sigh* Of course, IAOAP. :-P

    3. Re:My aunt and KNOPPIX by turgid · · Score: 1
      If your aunt is that stupid, the only way she'd be at university would be in a jar of formaldehyde.

      She's from a generation where women weren't expected to think for themselves.

      Last decade, politicians made it very easy for almost everyone to go to university. They turned all the old colleges into universities and now you don't even have to pass any exams to get in. It used to be you needed 'A's and 'B's (my day) but now people with 'D's and 'E's are getting in. The idea was to keep as many people as possible out of the Unemployment statistics and to give degree status to people studying Leisure and Tourism and Hotel Catering.

      My wife teaches English, and the knock-on effect on the school pupils has been dreadful. None of them have any ambition at all to do well, because they know they can continue their studies with E grades.

    4. Re:My aunt and KNOPPIX by turgid · · Score: 1
      So she's 150 years old? Better hope she is in a jar of formaldehyde, or she'll whiff a bit by now.

      No, the 1960s weren't that long ago, and we are talking about puritanical right-wing Scotland here.

  94. bugs.... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

    Do they have a Bugzilla for this? I was trying to get this going under Windowsand was unable to. I alsonoticed the batch file that comes with this tries to start this with 1 GB of ram. If my machine has 1 GB of ram and I boot Windows and try to get this to run and it asks for 1 GB, I am going to have...issues. :D I have tried 2 separate machines and was unsuccessful to get this to boot in QEMU on windows. DSL works fine. Better then fine. It's worked on almost every PC I tried it on including the same laptop. I would love to give this a try but damned if I can figure out what I need to do to get it running. I'll stick to a modified DSL for my booting Linux in Windows deal. Oh....booting off of the CD did work fine.

    --

    Gorkman

  95. everyone overestimate average windows users by Bitter+and+Cynical · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe I just know a lot of stupid people but if you run linux under windows, your average user won't understand that linux actually replaces windows. A lot of people just assume to see the little magic start button when they power up. Booting directly into linux helps simple folk (in regards to their technological prowess) realize that windows isn't magically built into the hardware and doesn't need to boot for the computer to run.

  96. A quicker way to run QEMU+and your iso on Win by marko123 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I did this on XP:
    Downloaded and ran win version of qemu
    Create an image file bigger than your iso using qemu
    Point to your ISO
    Run! (Knoppix took about 8 mins on old PIII laptop)

    --
    http://pcblues.com - Digits and Wood
  97. Portable Virtual Privacy Machine by millette · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's another option, designed for a USB key. It runs Firefox, Thunderbird, etc. all in a virtual linux machine. The release is planned to work on GNU/Linux, ms windows and mac os x, although the current release candidate doesn't work on the mac. It also uses qemu, of course. More info: Portable Virtual Privacy Machine.

    1. Re:Portable Virtual Privacy Machine by shaen · · Score: 1

      I didn't see it mentioned anywhere on the site that this is really just a (very) slightly modified version of Damn Small Linux.

  98. use coLinux+VNC by idlake · · Score: 1

    The only way to run X is by having an X server on your Windows box,

    CoLinux works like a charm using VNC: you run a VNC server on the Linux side and a VNC client on the Windows side. A side-benefit is that you can actually disconnect from the coLinux process and reconnect later.

    As far as I'm concerned, coLinux is the only way to go for running Linux under Windows these days; it is superior in just about every way to any of the commercial or free solutions.

    If you don't restrict yourself to that subset of cases, then QEMU wins on account of having support for far more than just a custom build of the Linux kernel.

    That's irrelevant for Knoppix. Furthermore, no, I have not wanted to run Freedos or the SLES9 installer. QEMU may be useful for someone for those cases, but that doesn't make it a good choice for Knoppix.

    Besides, rather than spending a lot of time now trying to get QEMU integrated with Knoppix (and giving the user the false impression that Linux is slow), it would be better if all that effort were spent on actually making coLinux better. CoLinux is pretty much ready for prime-time; all the additions now (COFS, framebuffer) are just gravy.

    1. Re:use coLinux+VNC by cduffy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      CoLinux works like a charm using VNC: you run a VNC server on the Linux side and a VNC client on the Windows side.
      VNC is not exactly fast or efficient -- being a local display mechanism isn't what it's designed for, and it shows.
      That's irrelevant for Knoppix. Furthermore, no, I have not wanted to run Freedos or the SLES9 installer.
      I know that. That's why I addressed "the presently relevant set of cases" and a more general situation independantly.

      Every post in this thread I've written from Firefox running in a coLinux instance displaying via the Cygwin X server. I use coLinux, I like coLinux, but that's not to say that other solutions like QEMU have no place. The parent asked if there existed any advantage of QEMU over coLinux -- not specific to Knoppix but in general. I answered that question.

    2. Re:use coLinux+VNC by idlake · · Score: 1

      VNC is not exactly fast or efficient -- being a local display mechanism isn't what it's designed for, and it shows.

      The VNC server is an optimized software implementation of X11, the same implementation you run on a framebuffer device. It sends screen deltas through an efficient IPC mechanism to a client.

      You will have a hard time matching that with any kind of frame buffer emulation (as in QEMU or in future versions of coLinux). Think about it: if you run an X11 server on an emulated framebuffer, the framebuffer emulation gets no information about what parts of the frame buffer have been updated; it needs to figure all of that out and then reverse engineer graphics calls to the host window system. That's really hard. (There are a bunch of other implementation choices, but they are just as hard.)

      Furthermore, VNC has different protocols for different connections, including one optimized for local connections.

      Overall, VNC is probably the best choice for these kinds of applications even if you have a framebuffer emulation around. It might well be worth to think about not offering frame buffer emulation for coLinux at all. What would be useful for coLinux and QEMU would be access to the display hardware so that you can run something like X11 natively. But that's hard.

    3. Re:use coLinux+VNC by cduffy · · Score: 1

      The VNC server is an optimized software implementation of X11, the same implementation you run on a framebuffer device. It sends screen deltas through an efficient IPC mechanism to a client.

      Yup, but is the X11->VNC=>VNC viewer really going to be more efficient than X11=>X server? I'm a hard sell on that one.

      Think about it: if you run an X11 server on an emulated framebuffer, the framebuffer emulation gets no information about what parts of the frame buffer have been updated; it needs to figure all of that out and then reverse engineer graphics calls to the host window system.

      Sure. If you want performance, the existant approach (X server on the host) makes most sense -- more, I'd argue, than VNC on the host. The point of running a framebuffer is to support things like Qt/E or Gtk/FB or native framebuffer apps or so forth, not to replace {X,VNC} on the host.

      OTOH, having an area of memory that's a DirectX surface (mapped directly to video memory if possible) available to the coLinux instance as a framebuffer doesn't strike me as being all *that* hard (though I'm sure I'd understand what bits are tricky better if I tried to implement it), and that -would- be reasonably performant.

    4. Re:use coLinux+VNC by idlake · · Score: 1

      Yup, but is the X11->VNC=>VNC viewer really going to be more efficient than X11=>X server? I'm a hard sell on that one.

      Sometimes it is, sometimes it is not. In this case, there probably is no real practical difference. The reason to use VNC on the Windows side is that it's small and simple. A self-contained, efficient X11 server (XGL?) would, of course, be an alternative for running Knoppix+coLinux under Windows.

      But X11->VNC=>VNC is more efficient than X11->Simulated-Framebuffer=>MS-Windows, because the Simulated-Framebuffer=>MS-Windows part is inefficient.

      The point of running a framebuffer is to support things like Qt/E or Gtk/FB or native framebuffer apps or so forth, not to replace {X,VNC} on the host.

      Sure, and there are some special-purpose apps where that is useful. But we're talking about running Knoppix under Windows.

      OTOH, having an area of memory that's a DirectX surface (mapped directly to video memory if possible) available to the coLinux instance as a framebuffer doesn't strike me as being all *that* hard (though I'm sure I'd understand what bits are tricky better if I tried to implement it), and that -would- be reasonably performant.

      Yes, that would be. I think it would be great if someone did that.

      Today, however, I think coLinux+VNC would be a better solution than QEMU+Simulated-Framebuffer, which is what Knoppix seems to have chosen.

    5. Re:use coLinux+VNC by cduffy · · Score: 1

      But X11->VNC=>VNC is more efficient than X11->Simulated-Framebuffer=>MS-Windows, because the Simulated-Framebuffer=>MS-Windows part is inefficient.

      I concede that point. I've always conceded that point. It's the special-purpose apps that having a framebuffer is useful for, granted -- but in a previous life, I had to do a lot of stuff with such special-purpose apps.

      Sure, and there are some special-purpose apps where that is useful. But we're talking about running Knoppix under Windows.

      Nuh-uh. The head of this thread asked, in effect, "is there anything QEMU is better than coLinux for?", rather than "is there any good reason Knoppix should use QEMU rather than coLinux?". Those are two very, very different questions, and the first one is the one I've been trying to answer.

  99. My Review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    On a p4 system with a gig of ram, the performance is pretty lacking. It might be a better idea to use one of those drive image programs rather then the actual cd. Anyway, my thanks for those souls seeding their hearts out on that torrent.

  100. URL for "QEMU and coLinux with KNOPPIX" at AIST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
  101. my granny.. by govt-serpent · · Score: 3, Funny

    My granny was Admiral Grace Hopper, you insensitive clod!

  102. sig by sum.zero · · Score: 1

    "Stupidity is ALWAYS terminal."

    so is intelligence.

    sum.zero

  103. Here is coLinux+KNOPPIX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  104. Re:OT: www.oliverthered.f2s.com by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    hmm.. I'll have to update the build scripts,they should be running CSS and XHTML checks.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  105. Re:Great, But... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    Because you can then let people try before they buy without even needing to reboot.

    Or testing a cross-platform software you're developing... of course, considering an emergency situation where you can't install Linux of course.

  106. Change Notes? by DarkZero · · Score: 1

    Knoppix 3.7 couldn't detect my computer's onboard sound, so I couldn't really play around with it for most of the things that I usually do with my PC. Are there any changes or anything that could make this worth downloading and installing, either in Knoppix or in Linux (I believe 3.8 has a newer kernel than 3.7?), or is there possibly anything more I could do with Knoppix 3.7 to get it to work? I tried configuring the sound drivers, but the automatic configuration failed every time and I wasn't willing to check each individual driver to see what might hit the spot.

  107. Folding@Home? by Chas · · Score: 1

    Ah. Now I see...

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  108. no thanks by raver31 · · Score: 1

    I will stick with Linux even if microsoft goes completely insane and releases the source code for windows under the gpl and someone releases a "FREE" version. I don't want it. I like my pc to RUN RUN RUN, none of that crashing/virus/spyware shit on my pc please, let me just get on with some work, oh and games ! thank you... mandrake fan

  109. Re:OT: www.oliverthered.f2s.com by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    Fixed that one
    , but now it looks like libxml (or xmlstarlet) has started playing by not closing the content-type meta tag

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  110. coLinux needs admin rights by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

    coLinux needs admin rights to use networking.

    So I could only use it on private / friends computers

  111. Competition by tepples · · Score: 1

    It's got the momentum, why divide up resources?

    GNOME vs. KDE, Linux vs. BSD, Mozilla vs. Konqueror. Among the benefits of competition is that it breeds lack of a monoculture. Would you rather have everybody use IE because you're not "dividing up resources" between Microsoft Corp. and Mozilla Foundation?

    1. Re:Competition by interiot · · Score: 1
      On the other hand, hardware monoculture is, in my humble opinion, currently beneficial. In hardware, as long as you have at least one competitor (AMD), economies of scale are the most significant way to reduce costs, since manufacturing costs are unavoidable in hardware.

      We haven't had any usable open-source binary-translation virtualizers yet. My guess is that it's because the binary-translation that vmWare does is very complicated. The hardware modifications that AMD and Intel are releasing should simplify this quite a bit, allowing many more OSS projects to be written that support binary-level virtualization.

      Eventually most people should have virtualization support in their hardware. And there will be many different OSS virtualizers. And at that point, it will be much easier for normal people to try linux, because Knoppix will support virtualization at that point, and run side-by-side with Windows.

      In the meantime, I don't see any point in supporting x86 virtualizers that plan on sticking with existing methods (either paravirtualization or binary translation ones).

  112. "I have dial-up, you insensitive clod!" by tepples · · Score: 1

    In the meanwhile you can download it from home.

    Setting up broadband would cost $480 for some customers, that is, $50/month for a minimum 12-month commitment minus $10/month that the customer is already paying for NetZero or Netscape dial-up Internet access.

  113. Re:Great, But... by akadruid · · Score: 1

    The trick is not so much rebooting as ensuring that they boot from CD. Not everyone can pick that idea up easily.

    But almost any windows user can take a cd, insert into drive, and wait.

    --
    "Those who cast the votes decide nothing; those who count the votes decide everything." (attrib. Joseph Stalin)
  114. dl 130 - ul 20 by clsc · · Score: 1

    lotsa peers and seeds - no problems downloading the torrent here

  115. Re:OT: www.oliverthered.f2s.com by Taladar · · Score: 1

    I know what you mean about Firefox but why don't you try Opera?

  116. Use it with VMWare by gosand · · Score: 1

    What if I used VMware on Windows to boot up a virtual machine running Linux emulating Windows? Maybe I would finally have a secure Windows environment.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  117. Re:OT: www.oliverthered.f2s.com by plumby · · Score: 1
    Why are you using IE if you have firefox?

    I'm stuck with IE, because I installed (and then uninstalled) bluetooth drivers 2 weeks ago and FireFox no longer works (it starts, but there's no window visible).

  118. Re:Great, But... by CaptCanuk · · Score: 1

    That's true.
    The easier way to get knoppix on their system in live mode is to stick the CD in the tray and seal it shut. Within the day the system will be booting knoppix (saying the bios has cdrom boot enabled and before harddrive).

    --
    ---- The geek shall inherit the Earth.
  119. Torrent slashdotted? by SenorMooCow · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or is the torrent file completely slashdotted? Both on the site from the article and on linuxtracker.org it just times out. Anybody have a mirror to the .torrent?

    --
    I run a Debian/Kernel/Knoppix Mirror: (http|ftp|rsync)://debian.ams.sunysb.edu/
    apt-get @ > 5MBps == teh win!
  120. Bah humbug by akepa · · Score: 1

    It's intolerably slow running under Windows on my system (AMD 64 3000, 1GB RAM).

  121. Re:This allows dual-use of both Windows and KNOPPI by tahuti · · Score: 1

    Antivirus http://www.bitdefender.com/bd/site/mirrors.php

  122. Re:Great, But... by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

    Mountains don't run off of solar power...

    --
    -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  123. WinOS? by Caspian · · Score: 1

    What is this "WinOS" thing?

    Seriously, people. Stop making up names for things. Windows is called Windows, not "WinOS". Linux-based systems are Linux-based systems (or "Linux systems" if you must, or "GNU/Linux-based systems" to be more politically correct), but they are not "Linux OS". Apple's current operating system is "Mac OS X"; it is not "Apple Max OS", "MaxOS", "Max Unix OS" or "Macintosh OS".

    Nobody goes around referring to a Ford Explorer as the "Explore Ford" or the "Explorer Forder" or anything else like that. Why, then, do people (even geeks) consistently mess up the names of operating systems!?

    --
    With spending like this, exactly what are "conservatives" conserving?
  124. Re:OT: www.oliverthered.f2s.com by grolschie · · Score: 1

    Ads. ;-)

  125. Re:OT: www.oliverthered.f2s.com by grolschie · · Score: 1

    LOL. Downloaded Opera just now, selected the graphical ads option, and blocked advertising.com in my router. Now it just shows "not found" where the ads usually appear - except for the "Buy Opera today" ad. :-)

  126. Re:Great, But... by kdark1701 · · Score: 1

    I realize that; since game developers develop games for windows, a windows box is the practical choice for gaming.

  127. BartPE is the bomb by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    but a shame it won't run everything, or if it does, it requires some complex rigging of files and registry settings to make the programs run under BartPE. Even then there still is problems, like Malware removers removing the infected files, but not the registry keys that are changed by the malware.

    When someone's NTFS partiation got hosed, I used to have to bring a spare hard drive with me with XP on it to run Chkdsk to fix their hard drive after booting from the spare. Now I just boot a BartPE CD-ROM and run Chkdsk from that.

    NTFS is weird, got a hard drive error on the disk, and it won't let Windows load any further to run chkdsk to fix the problem. Instead it just complains that it cannot load some file or something. Boot off a floppy disk, and it cannot see the NTFS partition.

    BartPE can run Embedded Mozilla, TCP/IP networking, Nero, McAfee AntiVirus, Adaware, Ghost 8.0, and other useful utilities to work on hard drives that won't boot, or need malware removed and booting the OS won't allow it to remove Malware that has become part of the system or in use and cannot be removed.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  128. Bit Defender by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    I tried to download it, but the Bit Torrent tracker is down.

    How can I update the virus signatures? Or do I have to download a new version with each virus database update?

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  129. Re:kanotix is great :) by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    I have KANOTIX, I run a web server using KNOPPIX, but when I get free time I might change it over to KANOTIX. It seems KANOTIX uses a web based install script that always makes sure you got the latest version. KANO apparently wrote the scripts for KNOPPIX.

    When I installed KNOPPIX to my hard drive, I used the Debian install method.

    Just one thing, those Novell programs like Red Carpet, refuse to run on KNOPPIX/KANOTIX because it does not see it as Debian. Therefore the whole Novell line of installable software I cannot install that is based on using Red Carpet. :(

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  130. KnoDoze by Parley · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't KnowDoze be a better name?

  131. Re:OT: www.oliverthered.f2s.com by X0563511 · · Score: 1

    attributes always have a value now.

    like checked="checked"
    instead of checked

    I would much rather see it as a bool instead, checked="1"

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...