Slashdot Mirror


Xbox 360 & Next-Gen Live Specifications Leaked

Tim Grube writes "Gaming Horizon is reporting that the Xbox Live 360 specifications and console specifications have been leaked. Xbox Live on the next generation is said to have two version, a free one and a subscriber one. The Xbox 360 iself will have a DVD-RW, be Wi-Fi Ready, contain 3 USB ports, and have 512 GDDR3 RAM."

145 of 226 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Nothing shocking by Neitokun · · Score: 1, Insightful

    pfft. when have we ever been able to upgrade a console using off-the-shelf stuff?

  2. Looks impressive by SlongNY · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The specs look impressive, expecially with a custom kernel to take advantage of the hardware. I am just curious what the price point will be. I am going to grab it the day it comes out, mainly because i want to make use of my 45 Inch LCD Tv :) I wonder low long it will take after lauch for the 1st modchip.

    1. Re:Looks impressive by SlongNY · · Score: 1

      I was referring to custom kernel in regards to the specs being compared with say a PC.

    2. Re:Looks impressive by Guspaz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It will very likely be quite affordable... Microsoft will sell it at a huge loss hoping to make up the cash on xbox live, game licences, and so on.

      It will be quite funny, really, the hardware will be faster than any desktop (And most servers) on the market now or then by a long shot (It will even blow away the fastest Apple G5s), and yet it will probably sell for well under $1000.

      You can bet the xbox linux people are going to be scrambling to unlock this sucker. If the original xbox made for a nice cheap home server, the xbox 360 is probably faster than most quad-processor servers that cost ten times as much.

      I say faster than quad servers because the CPUs the xbox ships with are each 500mhz faster than the fastest Apple ships now (2.7ghz). Combine that fact with the fact that there are diminishing returns for SMP, this means that you can probably get better performance out of 3x3.2 than 4x2.7

      But hey, Apple doesn't make quad-processor systems or servers, and their servers top out at 2.3ghz.

      So what am I trying and failing to say? The XBox 360 will pack an insane amount of punch, and yet be dirt cheap for what you get.

    3. Re:Looks impressive by HAKdragon · · Score: 1

      ...it will be quite funny, really, the hardware will be faster than any desktop (And most servers) on the market now or then by a long shot, and yet it will probably sell for well under $1000.

      Isn't that how the original XBox was? Granted 700MHz wasn't that fast back in 2001, but it was a damn good deal to get that kind of hardware for $300 back then.

      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs. We have a protractor."
    4. Re:Looks impressive by Guspaz · · Score: 3, Informative

      A dumb xbox fanboy. Gee, never seen one of those before...

      You are kidding right? You couldn't be further from the truth. I don't own an xbox, I never planned to buy one, and I also don't plan on buying an xbox 360 (Though it's media capabilities might entice me). I'm strictly a PC gamer, and dislike console games in general. I'm really not sure how I could be an XBox fanboy.

      Dual dual core machines in the 2.5 to 3ghz range or so are on the way for Apple and will most likely ship before the first xbox 360 hits the shelves.

      The XB360 clocks in at 3.2, if these specs are real, not "2.5 to 3ghz". In addition, the XB360 is supposed to have THREE processors (cores), not two. If the posted specs are real it still puts Apple's fastest to shame.

      And second the CPU in the xbox 360 isn't a 970 and can't be compared to it by clock speed. It doesn't take a developer with access to the hardware to know that.

      It might as well be. As far as I can tell, each core in the XBOX360 should be significantly faster than a seperate PPC970. It looks to be about the same, but with something like HyperThreading added to each core. If you have information that says that the cores are slower clock-for-clock, feel free to share it, but for now it looks like each core should be faster.

      The xbox 360 is weak. Sorry to burst your fanboy bubble. This is what happens when your previous effort goes in the red for 3 and a half billion dollars and the higher ups at your company slash your budget.I do hope next time you make a post like this you will make certain you know what the hell you are talking about before you make a fool of yourself. It helps to actually RTFA.

      And not only is it weak, it is going to be weak by a wide margin compared to the PS3 and Revolution. This is going to be ugly for MS...
      Right, do you have proof? Or are you one of those idiots who thinks that Cell must be faster simply because it has more cores, without any consideration for speed per core? I guess you're also forgetting the fact that the XB360 will be out a heck of a lot earlier than the PS3 or Revolution, possibly as much as a year earlier. So you're pretty stupid to suggest that the relative performance even matters at this point. Give any company a year of extra development time and they can put out something faster than what they have now, certainly.

      My post can be summed up with an acronym STFU&RTFA

    5. Re:Looks impressive by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      It was, but it was never amazing hardware (The CPU wasn't anyway, the GPU was nice at the time). It was just a good deal for what you are getting.

      The XB360 looks like it will be FASTER than any desktop, but at a console-like pricepoint. And while this wouldn't matter to anybody who wanted the XB360 for Linux, but as a console it's GPU is loads faster than ATI/nVidia's fastest. I suspect that the XB360 might launch at about the same time or after ATI's new desktop part based on the same core, however.

    6. Re:Looks impressive by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Nope.

      Unless you only mean faster in pure Hz, which is a meaningless comparison.

      The chips in the 360 are weaker but clocked higher. It will be at or just below desktop performance if only dual core systems are out by the end of the year.

      But why? To me it looks like each core is essentially a PPC970, but with the ability to execute two threads at the same time (a la HyperThreading). So if anything it would be faster, no?


      The GPU is a bit more up in the air. I hear NVidia is working hard to release a desktop chip around the time the new xbox is released that will make the ATI gpu look like nothing special - there is some lingering bitterness at NVidia over the dust up over the xbox pricing dispute...

      I would suspect nVidia is aiming to compete with ATI's desktop version of the R520 (which will be in the 360), since it should be out in ballpark the same timeframe as the 360.

      I don't much care who has the faster graphics card. If nVidia can put out a faster card, power to them! Competition breeds innovation, which can only be good for us. However I'm wary of such claims from nVidia after the NV30. They claimed it would be twice as fast as the Radeon 9700, and would be available right after the 9700's release. Instead, it ended up being slower than the 9700, and came out more than 6 months later.

      Since I was saving up and waiting for the NV30, when it's benchmarks came out I was a bit ticked off and just bought a 9700. Since then I've been wary about such claims from both companies.

      So while I do hope nVidia has a chip out that is faster than the X800, I'll believe it when I see the benchmarks.

    7. Re:Looks impressive by oldwolf13 · · Score: 1

      I was (am) a little pissed off at the naming conventions of nvidia (and ati to a lesser extent). As a secondary card, on a whim i bought a geforce fx 5600xt, and I know I probably should have researched it, but it was right when they came out.

      The damn thing is a lot slower then my gf4 ti 4200 8x, and it cost about $30 more (before tax)! Nowadays it's just a spare ready to swap in if my main card (9800 pro) fails.

      As I said, I bought it without researching it, and I guess my thoughts were on the fact that aTI's top cards had the XT designation.

      To tell you the truth, if I was going to buy a mid range card by nvidia now I still wouldn't know which piece was the best bang for the buck, whereas ATI's I would know.

      Hey wait, wasn't this thread about the xbox 360?

      Here's my thoughts:

      stupid name. ugly design (from what I've seen).

      I think microsoft will make it a lOT harder to mod, in which case it will be useless to me, i wouldn't have a current generation xbox if it wasn't for XBox media center.

      I think this is part of the reason they're going away from the x86 ancestry of the original xbox... to try and make it harder for anyone other then MS to have control over it.

      Also, it will be a lot harder to do homebrew development for, as the XDK is now tied to a MS hardware product... can't just install visual studio and the new xdk on your current PC.

      If I can't do what i want with my hardware, i have no use for it.

      --
      If I can't smoke and swear I'm fucked.
    8. Re:Looks impressive by AzraelKans · · Score: 1

      Actually I would hold back on modding it. Xbox live is not going to be available for modded consoles, and since (Aparently) is going to be free (or have a free mode at least) that could be a major handicap since all games are going to be compatible to live one way or another.

      Besides the dash is going to look and work like avalaunch or evolutionx (which are the best dashes to have in a modded xbox these days) The only thing I will be really missing is the ability to have games stored on the hard drive for easy access (theres not even a mention if theres going to be a hdd or not) but you have to take the good with the bad.

      --
      Go ahead MOD my day!
      More opinions here
    9. Re:Looks impressive by default+luser · · Score: 1

      To tell you the truth, if I was going to buy a mid range card by nvidia now I still wouldn't know which piece was the best bang for the buck, whereas ATI's I would know.

      Agreed, although ATI also was guilty of this in the 9000 series (9000, 9100, 9200, 9250 are all DX8.1, 9500, 9550, 9600, 9700, 9800). And it doesn't help that both companies use crazy qualifiers like SE, LE, XT, PE, GT, Ultra to create overlapping markets.

      Really, which one is faster: a 9600 XT, or a 9800 SE? Bet you wouldn't have any idea unless you thoroughly researched them.

      Thankfully, Nvidia has finally recognized that all this crazy branding is a mistake. For the 6000 series, Nvidia only sells the 6200(TC), 6600(GT) and 6800(GT, Ultra) series, and there's little overlap. The lowest-end 6800 is faster than a 6600 GT, and the lowest-end 6600 is faster than a 6200.

      ATI is working on this as well, but their product range still has considerable overlap, and they still suffer from "too many qualifiers" syndrome.

      Oh, and we migth as well stay on-topic. Don't worry about the X-box 360 and security. Just like every "secure" platform before it, people will find ways to hack their way in.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

  3. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    What are dots per second? I can't tell if they're better or worse than the 700 MNz (meganerdz?) memory.

    1. Re:What? by Castar · · Score: 1

      I think the "dots per second" is probably supposed to be dot-product operations per second.

      --
      I yearn for you tragically. A. T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.
    2. Re:What? by Castar · · Score: 1

      Nevermind, it's just an OCR error or typo of some kind.

      --
      I yearn for you tragically. A. T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.
    3. Re:What? by yakitori · · Score: 1

      I think Microsoft has invented a new marketing term for describing how many polygons per second they can render. Oy....

  4. Iffy sources by frikazoyd · · Score: 1

    The sources on this report are actually kind of iffy. The first place I saw the report was on endgaget, and they say that the specs "were posted and then quickly pulled from the TeamXbox forums." The thing that makes them interesting is the proximity to the actual release date, and the reaction once it was posted. But bottom line, it could be entirely fake.

    1. Re:Iffy sources by Ayaress · · Score: 1

      Really big givaway is the DVD-RW. The "leaks" before the first X-Box release suggested that you could put games on the hard drive for faster load times, but that wasn't there in the final product. Console makers are having a hard enough time trying to thwart piracy without using drives that crap out a month after you buy them that I doubt they'll build the tools to do so into the console.

    2. Re:Iffy sources by j.bellone · · Score: 1

      The Disks might be some form of hybrid; a partial DVD-RW allowing for the writing of game data to the game disk itself. That's just a guess. There is really no other reason to have a DVD-RW in the system unless they totally plan to push this as a media-center hub and allow for Tivo-like features.

      But with a 20GB hard-drive I find that not possible.

      --
      I'm f#$king magic!
  5. Re:Nothing shocking by bassakward · · Score: 1

    Not yet, but we can always hope for improvements the next time around. Buying a new graphics card and/or a new processor might be cheaper than buying the XBOX3 (the 720?) in a few years.

  6. Single Profile and Mobile Device Music...Great! by MBraynard · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This is a really nice touch that seems not to get much attention. What it means is that rather than having to create a profile in every game (Halo, Halo2, GR, MechAssault, etc.) you can have a single profile. Hopefully the basic options, like aviator-absolute stick looking, will carry through, along with playlists.

    Also cool is the support for music from mobile players. I have a Dell Pocket DJ with the Napster2Go service. This will allow me to carry my 'library' of over a million songs over to the Xbox.

    I really can't see that they missed anything with this. Perhaps they will overprice is, but I'm looking for a 299 price point.

    1. Re:Single Profile and Mobile Device Music...Great! by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      I thought invert-Y was one of the examples for what that profile system will do? so basically, it's very likely that basic options will be stored in your profile.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    2. Re:Single Profile and Mobile Device Music...Great! by rednalb · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can buy the songs for .99 if you want to keep them/burn them.

    3. Re:Single Profile and Mobile Device Music...Great! by syates21 · · Score: 1

      Uh, try not to show yourself so blatantly ignorant of the Napster offerings. If you want to buy 99 cent tracks from Napster, they will happily sell you them.

      Just think how many people *gasp* rent their movies from Netflix and Blockbuster too. Oh the horror. Plus, whose tastes don't change over time. I don't listen to too many of the songs I bought 15 years ago.

      Sorry that you're bitter your leet iPod doesn't offer you this added flexibility. Better luck next time.

    4. Re:Single Profile and Mobile Device Music...Great! by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      What makes you think MBraynard will ever tire of finding at least one new album a month? Granted the collection dies with the user, but a user of the service may be perfectly prepared to pay the equivalent of one album a month the rest of their life. Just like people pay for cable.

    5. Re:Single Profile and Mobile Device Music...Great! by MBraynard · · Score: 1
      Actually, I will be switching to Yahoo's new service and the cost is going to be either $5 or $7, not $15. I suspect Napster may drop their price, too.

      Like I said, it's like paying for storage. I can listen to it anywhere with a car kit. And even if my HD does crash, I can just DL them all again.

    6. Re:Single Profile and Mobile Device Music...Great! by tjhorne · · Score: 1

      Who needs to pay for a music service when there is BitTorrent?

  7. Re:That is impressive by spikestabber · · Score: 1

    Yeah, GDDR3 is expensive. Take a look at the price of the 512M 6800U graphics cards, over 800 bucks.

  8. Re:Nothing shocking by justforaday · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't that kinda defeat the whole purpose of it being a, y'know, console (ie, a single target platform for the coders to aim for)?

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
  9. Re:IBMs won the war by fr0dicus · · Score: 2, Informative

    Neither of those two, nor the new Nintendo (also IBM chips) will be using G5's, the Cell is certainly not a G5, and this article also refers to a custom chip.

  10. Re:Nothing shocking by p4ul13 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It is annoying that everythign is custom. That means no upgrading other then by buying a new box from MS.

    Well it is a console game system. If you're concerned about upgrading your game system then this might not be your system. A PC gaming rig might be more appropriate.

    Myself I'm curious to compare this to the PS3 specs when we see them. I love my PS2. I'm not really a fan of MS software, but am open to the possibility of them producing a good console system.

    --
    Paul Lenhart writes words!
  11. Hmmm.. wheres the physics card? by AzraelKans · · Score: 1

    I thought that xbox360 was going to use the ageia physics card? (they said at least one console was going to use it) if the console using it is the ps3 or revolution (although I doubt it) I think my money is going elsewhere.

    --
    Go ahead MOD my day!
    More opinions here
    1. Re:Hmmm.. wheres the physics card? by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      What's a physics card?

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    2. Re:Hmmm.. wheres the physics card? by Reignking · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here is a thread from early March regarding the "World's First Physics Processing Unit"...

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    3. Re:Hmmm.. wheres the physics card? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      A set of false specs for the Revolution listed a PPU but the author admitted that he was just making shit up.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    4. Re:Hmmm.. wheres the physics card? by Stunning+Tard · · Score: 1

      I was looking for this too so I guess it's not happening. At least ageia's physics SDK will help developers multi-thread their games for a system with 3 CPU's.

  12. Yeah, but... by Shook18 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    does it run Linux? No seriously this time; if this thing can be modded to run like the last one, this would be a SERIOUS desktop replacement... for a fraction of the cost.

    1. Re:Yeah, but... by jasonmicron · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, it doesn't run Linux. It runs games.

    2. Re:Yeah, but... by shadowzero313 · · Score: 1

      same with the Xbox...and the PS2...and the GC...and the GBA...and the DS

    3. Re:Yeah, but... by jericho4.0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The original XBox was basically an Intel PC. This device is not. The major problem this raises is that binaries will not work, so no flash, games or commercial apps. Still, at the probable price point it's peerless as a personal plaything.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    4. Re:Yeah, but... by Pepsi__Blue · · Score: 1

      From what I understand , the custom PPC processor is dramatically different than a desktop CPU, so much so that it would not be a great desktop replacement. I mean come on not even Microsoft is dumb enough to put out a product that could compete with distributors of Windows (i.e. Dell, EMachines, Compaq, all other bad desktop/laptop computer companies). Not only would it piss of these distributors, unless they made X-Box with a Windows OS, it would facilitate the adoption of Linux by the "average" user. Additionally, if they did make Windows for X-Box it would take some time unless they want to fall prey to new lawsuits similar to the old ones where their OS and software departments shared secrets, and everybody knows the Linux community can develop faster than corporations so it would most likely hurt them anyways.

    5. Re:Yeah, but... by 0kComputer · · Score: 1

      Yeah, thats some nice bullshit you just pulled out of your ass. Last time I checked, MS had 50+ million in the bank, I don't think losing a few hundred million dollars is going to break the bank. Microsoft has been loss leading this entire time, its part of their plan.

      As for Sony having the "hardware" and "infrastructure" (whatever that means), I think you need to get a clue. Sony is taking a pretty big gamble using CELL tech, and they are known for releasing faulty garbage (PSP broken pixels, disk read error anyone?)

      It will be interesting to see how it all plays out, but don't post PS2 fanboy bullshit here. XBox isn't going anywhere.

      --
      Top 10 Reasons To Procrastinate
      10.
    6. Re:Yeah, but... by Shook18 · · Score: 1

      "... it would facilitate the adoption of Linux by the "average" user" Sorry but.. the last xbox could run linux, and Linux wasn't adopted by the "average" user...

  13. Probably not a DVD-RW by Fred+Or+Alive · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I somehow doubt it'll have a DVD-RW drive, seems a bit odd for a console. It mroe looks like a list of formats the DVD drive can read, and DVD-RW isn't that odd, newer PS2s can read them as well.

    The new Xbox Live features sound a bit interesting, I hope they have it so you can have one Live account for Xbox 1 and 2, I don't want to pay twice for Live (not that I'll be getting an Xbox 2 that soon anyway)

    Otherwise, looks kinda like what everyones been saying anyway.

    [1] I really think Xbox 360 sounds silly. I'm not calling it until Microsoft call it that themselves.

    --
    10 PRINT "LOOK AROUND YOU ";
    20 GOTO 10
    1. Re:Probably not a DVD-RW by solowCX · · Score: 1

      It is odd for a console, yes, but have you seen the Xbox 360 remote control? I think the Windows Media Center Edition button makes it obviously clear that this will not only be a game system, but a PVR and progressive scan DVD player/burner.

    2. Re:Probably not a DVD-RW by Hellad · · Score: 1

      I don't know. The X-Box is a trojan horse trying to sneak into houses everywhere. With the DVD-RW, it is able to replace standard VCR's and even Tivo's to a lesser extent. MS is hoping to take over the living room, one home at a time.

    3. Re:Probably not a DVD-RW by MBraynard · · Score: 1

      I think you mis-read that. Support for DVD-RW doesn't mean it will burn anything but that it will play DVD-RW.

    4. Re:Probably not a DVD-RW by badasscat · · Score: 1

      I think the Windows Media Center Edition button makes it obviously clear that this will not only be a game system, but a PVR and progressive scan DVD player/burner.

      The Media Center button is so it can act as a Media Center Extender, which the current Xbox also does - for $100 extra. It is not going to be an MCE machine itself.

      It also does not imply anything about burning discs (which is not even a requirement of a real MCE machine).

  14. 256+ audio channels... by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Funny

    Great, I'm gonna need more speakers and wire now, damn it.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  15. Specs - scary specs. by Destoo · · Score: 4, Informative

    live specs are at the bottom. Sorry for the KH post. It seems I need more characters per line.

    1. Support for DVD-video, DVD-Rom, DVD-R/RW, CD-DA, CD-Rom, CD-R, CD-RW, WMA CD, MP3 cd, JPEG photo CD
    2. All games supported at 16:9, 720p and 1080i, anti-aliasing
    3. Customizable face plates to change appearance
    4. 3 USB 2.0 ports
    5. Support for 4 wireless controllers
    6. Detachable 20GB drive
    7. Wi-Fi ready

    Custom IBM PowerPC-based CPU
    - 3 symmetrical cores at 3.2 GHz each
    - 2 hardware threads per core
    - 1 VMX-128 vector unit per core
    - 1 MB L2 cache

    Custom ATI Graphics Processor
    - 500 MNz - 10 MB embedded DRAM - 48-way parallel floating-point shader pipelines - unified shader architecture

    Memory
    -512 MB GDDR3 RAM
    - 700 MNz DDR

    Memory Bandwidth
    - 22.4 GB/s memory interface bus bandwidth
    - 256 GB/s memory bandwidth to EDRAM
    - 21.6 GB/s frontside bus
    Audio
    - Mulitchannel surround sond output
    - Supports 48khz 16-bit audio
    - 320 independent decompression channels
    - 32 bit processing
    - 256+ audio channels

    Xbox Live, 2 types:

    Xbox Live Silver (no subscription required) and Xbox Live Gold (subscription benefits)

    Features for Gold service
    * Also for Silver # Also for Offline

    - Seamless transition to Xbox Live account from Xbox to Xbox 360
    - Access to MMOs (additional fees may apply) *
    - Free Xbox Live weekends *
    - Multiplayer online gameplay
    - Avatar for gamer profile * #
    - Motto for gamer profile * #
    - Personalized look for Xbox System Guide * #
    - Offline achievments * #
    - Online achievements *
    - Access to other players' Gamer cards via Live *
    - Cumulative gamer score * #
    - Location/language profile * #
    - Reputation *
    - Enahnced matchmaking using above
    - Skill level matchmaking
    - Gameplay style profile (casual, competitive, etc.)
    - Recent players list *
    - Free and premium download game content *
    - Free and premium downloadable movies, music, tv *
    - Downloadable demos/trailers *
    - Microtransactions *
    - Custom playlist in every game * #
    - Play music from portable devices * #
    - View images from digital camera * #
    - Strem media from Windows XP * #
    - Interactive screen savers * #
    - Track info for CDs * #
    - Communication with voice, video or text *

    --
    Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
    1. Re:Specs - scary specs. by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      I might have missed it, but is it compatable with old XBox games?

    2. Re:Specs - scary specs. by MagicM · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Interactive screen savers

      WTF?

    3. Re:Specs - scary specs. by Destoo · · Score: 1
      Doesn't look like it.

      quoting Zanzibar on EvilAvatar's forum:

      "At this point, my guess is that Microsoft will have a team of programmers working on backwards-compatibility...for a price.

      MS has tried to make fully-functional backwards-compatibility with Xbox, but haven't been 'entirely successful.' They're probably 90% of the way there, but as with everything, it's the last 10% that's the hardest and most time-consuming. The cost-effectiveness of making it happen at launch just wasn't there.

      After the system ships, probably a lot of the programming team will spend time ironing out the last 10%, and they'll probably offer it as a semi-low-cost download for the 360. Would you pay 20 bucks to play all your old games on the new system? For those who already own an Xbox, maybe not. But those whose first MS console is the 360 might want to play Halo 1."
      --
      Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
    4. Re:Specs - scary specs. by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1

      You have to tap a button every 2 minutes to keep it on the screen.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    5. Re:Specs - scary specs. by KrunZ · · Score: 1

      "700 MNz DDR"

      OMG it has 700 Mega Nazi. That's a lot of Nazi!

      This machine will be a threat to World Peace and should be stopped before it is to late!

    6. Re:Specs - scary specs. by aliens · · Score: 1

      Those are scary specs, but just how much of a loss is MS willing to take on this thing??

      The ATI chip & that CPU even in a few months time would run hundreds and hundreds each. This thing is a powerhouse of a computer. If they can sell them cheap enough as a console why not sell them as clusterable workstations?

      --
      -- taking over the world, we are.
    7. Re:Specs - scary specs. by AlexMax2742 · · Score: 1

      Specs don't mean shit.

      It's all about the games. Unfortuniatly, with no Halo at launch, I'm afraid you might be right about "MS will be lucky to keep half its installed base". As much as I love the Xbox's software library, a lot of people just bought the Xbox for Halo and sports games. Sad, really.

      --
      I'm the guy with the unpopular opinion
    8. Re:Specs - scary specs. by Destoo · · Score: 1

      This thing is a powerhouse of a computer. If they can sell them cheap enough as a console why not sell them as clusterable workstations?

      I think we've had that conversation last iteration, and will have it again and again each time MS releases a console.

      They sell at a loss because the profit is in the games market.

      Hack their box to run Linux, and even though the box you just hacked is not profitable anymore, it still counts in the number of "active consoles", and when they show these numbers to the game publishers, they go "ooooh!" and pay them to release games on their platform.

      It's going to be interesting to see how it plays out, becuase due to the fact that Live Silver is free, they will be able to actively monitor more consoles.

      Right now, they probably have a very rough estimate on the number of boxes that have been modded. If they allow everyone to connect for free, then that "dark zone" of unconnected boxes will be smaller.

      --
      Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
    9. Re:Specs - scary specs. by aliens · · Score: 1

      I know they take a loss on the Xbox's, but when the first one came out it was using a CPU and GPU that lagged behind what a desktop PC had.

      This thing is beyond any desktop PC, I'm just curious how much of a loss they take on this box.

      --
      -- taking over the world, we are.
  16. Massive Specs by mconeone · · Score: 1

    Those specs are HUGE! What is the price again? Compare that to a pc with comparable specs, maybe take off 25-40% for buying in bulk... It doesn't seem very plausable to me. Can anyone justify the price vs. hardware to me?

    1. Re:Massive Specs by Retric · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Don't forget:

      There selling it at a loss.

      It's not in stores yet so PC prices will drop by the time it's out.

      Or this could be a lie.

    2. Re:Massive Specs by chman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The console market these days works on selling the hardware at a loss, and the software at a huge profit.

      MS had a problem with the original Xbox launch in that their hardware was going to cost a fortune compared to the PS2 (which had been out for some time already and I think had come down in price), and it would still lose them money. So they had the idea that they would bundle the console with a load of games and get customers to leave Wal-Mart some $400-500 lighter. That's why around the launch time they kicked up a fuss about their 'attach rate', their marketing term for this tactic.

      The problem I see with them trying the same stunt this time is that this tactic relies on high quality launch titles, and since developers would have only had their dev kits for about a year come November when the 360 launches, they might not have anything to launch with.
      If it's not backwards compatible, then maybe they'll launch with an updated Halo 2 and some EA Sports titles. People have been buying HDTVs to watch football, so maybe NFL 2006 would be a good title to launch with and show off the HD prowess of the console.

      --
      This comment was formatted for readability, but I forgot the line break tags
    3. Re:Massive Specs by rylin · · Score: 1

      While expensive, I don't think MS will be the one taking the hit on the price here.
      My guess is their deal with IBM in regards to the CPU is something along the lines of X patents, and then Y USD per core.
      That way, IBM will take the financial hit - though I'm sure MS have a bunch of patents that would be worth it.

    4. Re:Massive Specs by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      Specs for consoles always seem large before they're released. I remember when they announced the specifications for the PS2 and X-Box, it all sounded impressive enough at the time, but a year or so later? Not quite so earth shattering.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    5. Re:Massive Specs by MBraynard · · Score: 1

      Onething they have going for them is that Xbox has the highest attachment rate of any console. If the same continues, it means they can take a bigger loss than the competitors and still make the same money.

    6. Re:Massive Specs by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
      Easy. Sell the console at a loss, with some kind of mechanism to ensure that only things we approve run on it, and make up the balance in game sales.

      This has been the strategy in the console industry for a long time, and one reason why a easy to install, full featured Linux (or other OS) is anathema to the manufactures.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    7. Re:Massive Specs by Bloomy · · Score: 1

      The Sony hype machine was in full gear when they announced the specs for the PS2. I don't remember off the top of my head things they claimed it could do (but couldn't), but it served it's purpose in the end. The Dreamcast never got a chance to take off because people decided to hold off a year and wait for the PS2.

    8. Re:Massive Specs by unclethursday · · Score: 1
      You obviously didn't read the GP. He/she mentioned the attach rate, and a lot of that attach rate has to do with MS forced bundles at launch (at least 3 games from most specialty retailers, that inflates the attach rate a lot), and many people are pretty sure the free game Xboxes have their free games counted towards that attach rate (as well as the free XBL games with a XBL starter kit).

      As for them making the same amount of money... they aren't making any right now on the current Xbox. The Xbox is around $3 billion in the hole. When it was pitched to shareholders, the amount of money that the division said they should lose was $900 million over five years. They're already around 3x+ that amount, and they haven't even hit the four-year mark.

      Sure, MS has gained mindshare... but now they're going to be facing the Sony Hype Machine(TM) just like Sega did when they launched the DC a year before the PS2. It'll be interesting to see what happens after Sony unveils their specs for the PS3 and gets that Sony Hype Machine(TM) rolling. Sure, just like the PS2, the PS3 will probably never ever live up to that hype, but the Sony Hype Machine(TM) has a TON of people who listen to it and believe everything it says (unfortunately).

  17. 3 PPC's? Damn, bring it on. by torpor · · Score: 1

    .. long as its got linux on it, of course ...

    oh, wait. its made by Microsoft. WTF??!?!

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  18. Re:Nothing shocking by generalleoff · · Score: 1

    I suspect the PS3 specs will be hard to describe. The base specs will proly be something pretty much close to the xbox360 (the same basic multicore POWER based CPU) but the nature of the CELL is going to make it hard to spit out a real world performance value on paper. Being sony though they will be liberal about it rather then conservative and will spit out some huge number they know damn well the system will never hit in real world use :)

  19. CD-RW?! Yeah right... by ThePolkapunk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I highly doubt that MS would be including a writeable CD with this. That would only make piracy easier, which MS has been fighting from day one of the XBOX. In fact, with all the hardware changes to mod chips, and booting people from xbox live, I'd say they've been putting up a bigger fight than any other video game hardware company. No, I really don't believe that there's a CD-RW. Frankly, this sounds like just more stupid fud that slashdot is tossing around. Why don't you stop posting random guesses and lies that anyone sees on the web?

    --
    Dear diary: Today I stuffed some dolls full of dead rats I put in the blender.
  20. "Leaked?" Please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Some people are so naive.

    1. Re:"Leaked?" Please. by ameoba · · Score: 1

      Regardless of a source, these specifications are completely unrealistic considering that a launch price will have to be around $500, with a launch date at the end of this year. It's one thing to argue that 'consoles are sold at a loss' but another thing entirely to believe that a console is going to ship with hardware significantly better than anything available on consumer PCs today.

      If you look at those CPUs, each of them will be faster than the fastest single-core chip available from either AMD or Intel today. A conservative estimate is that, in 6months, you're still looking at three $500+ CPUs.

      Next up is the graphics card. If you consider that the current top-of-the-line cards from ATI and nVidia are running 16-pipelines at about 500MHz, again costing $500 a pop, this makes the graphics chip in the new XBox about four times faster than anything available on the market today. This, of course, would be needed to provide adequate performance with AA enabled at 1080i resolutions (1920x1080).

      That's already hardware that, compared to PC components, will be worth more than $2000 come launch date, not including any of the other components of the system. As I said earlier, for this to be a viable console, it must sell for $500 or less at launch. With Moore's Law, that puts them at the break-even point at the end of a 5 year production run. Machines would be getting sold for a loss of over a grand at release which would require each console owner to purchase 4-500 game titles to even break even. I find these numbers pretty hard to swallow.

      Consider, additionally, that releasing something this much more powerful than what's available on PCs is completely unprecedented. As far back as I as the 2600, consoles have always been a few steps down from what's available on PCs of the day.

      All told, I'm suprised that I'm seeing so many otherwise technically savy sites lapping up this, completely absurd, obviously fabricated, 'leaked' information and spreading it as gospel.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    2. Re:"Leaked?" Please. by deafpluckin · · Score: 1
      Congrats! You just showed yourself to be an ignorant ass. So you saw 3.2Ghz and think that has any relevance as a metric to compare with other desktop chips? Fucking clueless clown.
      Actually, the "specs" say PowerPC chips, they don't say what kind of PowerPC chips -- so the 3.2 gHz rating could have any number of meanings. AFAIK PowerPC chips are not even close the 3.2 gHz yet, so the observation that they're higher mHz than current on market CPUs, including those of the same architecture, is still relavent. I -could- be wrong though.

      So, please show me charts, benchmarks of these chips you seem to be so keenly aware of.

      Aparently you are aware that CPU mHz is not a reliable metric of performance between chips of different architectures. What -you- failed to do was quote anything useful or provide anything constructive, so you're not helping anything. If your aim was to make yourself look smart by insulting someone else, then you've succeeded, congratulations! Asshole.

  21. so only one version, then? by muel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Does this put the rumors of "multiple versions of XBox 360" to rest? This spec sheet says the hard drive is "removable," not "optional"......

    1. Re:so only one version, then? by HAKdragon · · Score: 1

      I don't think the two are mutually exclusive. It could be removable simply so they could sell a low cost model that lacks the hard drive and a higher cost model that offers the hard drive. Then they could sell the hard drive as a seperate add on and gives you all of the "HDD Required" features that games may offer.

      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs. We have a protractor."
    2. Re:so only one version, then? by drjenk · · Score: 1

      I doubt microsoft will be giving away free hard drives this time around. I'd be surprised if the HD wasn't an extra add on for more $$$

  22. Re:CD-RW?! Yeah right... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "I highly doubt that MS would be including a writeable CD with this. That would only make piracy easier..."

    Uh. How would that have the slightest effect on piracy? Even XBOX 1 games exceed the size of a CD by ridiculous amounts. That'd be like saying the PS2's memory card will only make piracy easier.

    (Heh amusingly, it does, but not for that reason.)

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  23. from TFS by Reignking · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Xbox 360 iself will have a DVD-RW, be Wi-Fi Ready, contain 3 USB ports, and have 512 GDDR3 RAM.

    The iself? That sounds more like an Apple name. I call shenanigans!

    --
    One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
  24. Hmm by CurtDogg · · Score: 1

    Looks like Microsoft's feeling the heat from Nintendo :O

    1. Re:Hmm by stinkjones · · Score: 1

      Uhhh...? WTF are you talking about? The Revolution won't be out until next year. Not to mention, why would they feel pressure to get more powerful hardware by Nintendo? If I remeber correctly, Gamecube was the last of the current-gen consoles to be released (maby xbox, they were pretty close), and it had the weakest hardware of all 3. So, no, MS is not feeling any heat from nintendo, nor have they in the hardware department, although they may be shaking in their M$ boots waiting for the PS3 specs to come out.

    2. Re:Hmm by Bloomy · · Score: 1

      The Xbox and Gamecube were released the same week in North America, Nov 15, 2001 for the Xbox and Nov 18 for the Gamecube. The Gamecube had been out since Sep 14 in Japan. And the Playstation 2 is the least powerful machine of the 3.

    3. Re:Hmm by Hubertus_BigenD · · Score: 1

      While i agree whith you're "WTF".You sir have no idea what you are talking about. "Gamecube was the last of the current-gen consoles to be released." -The Xbox and Gamecube were released on the same day(11/9/01 IIRC). "and it had the weakest hardware of all 3". -No, the Gamecube is slightly less powerful then the XBOX and quite a lot more powerful than the PS2.

    4. Re:Hmm by rhpot1991 · · Score: 1

      I am pretty sure he was refering to the free live, as Nintendo has said that their internet services will all be free.

    5. Re:Hmm by stinkjones · · Score: 1

      as i said in my comment, I wasn't sure but I knew they came out around the same day. I'm talking US, not worldwide. I'm very closed-minded apparently

    6. Re:Hmm by mister_slim · · Score: 1

      Price to the consumer? Nintendo wins. Loss per console sold? Nintendo and Sony both look pretty good, but MS can't wait to drop production of the Xbox. I suppose taking a huge loss on hardware for a minimal advantage in power (enjoying those short Fable and Jade Empire load times, btw?) probably doesn't scare MS too much, but notice whose current gen suppliers are being used for the next gen?

  25. Wow by BrainsVolpe · · Score: 1

    I know the PS3 hasn't had as many leaks, and is much farther off, but the Xbox 360 sounds amazing. The PS3 is going to have a tougher time competing if its online isn't as robust. Killer hardware, insane online support, and interesting software. I'm not much of a fanboy, much less of Microsoft, but.... Sign me up!

    1. Re:Wow by imitier · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Agreed -- I'm very interested to see what Sony's take on online gaming is going to be with the PS3.

      I'm sure that the PS3 will ultimately have the kind interesting games that made me glad I own a PS2 (ICO, Katamari Damacy, Twisted Metal Black, etc.) But most of my gaming is done over Xbox Live these days, and the first dollars I spend on a next generation console will go towards whoever has the best online gaming system. So far, it looks like Microsoft is doing everything right to build on the current generation of Live. I hope Sony is watching Live very carefully and learning something from it.

    2. Re:Wow by imitier · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you know of a better online gaming system for consoles, I'd love to hear about it. As it stands, I haven't seen anything better on another console. As long as Microsoft continues supporting Live, which it certainly seem to be doing with the next Xbox, and as long as a number of my friends across the country still use Live, I don't particular care if Microsoft is making money on it or if it has sold less or more consoles than anyone else.

  26. I, for one, ... by Phu5ion · · Score: 4, Funny
    welcome our new PS3 overloads.

    What you expected me to welcome an XBox?

    --
    Slashdot is kind of like Playboy; we aren't here to read the articles.
  27. Economies of scale by Corpus_Callosum · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Microsoft does have a lot of latitude because of the economies of scale that the XBox 360 will offer. If Microsoft knows for a fact that they will sell 20 million consoles (or 30 million, or whatever), then it gives them pricing power.

    Not only power, it gives them the ability to practically dictate prices for parts. Everyone seems awestruck that MS might use DDR3 or a 3core PPC or toss in a DVD burner. Why? Because they are expenseive at frys?

    Once past a certain volume, manufacturing DDR3 won't be any more expensive than any other ram. Same with a new processor or even a DVD burner.

    This is where economies of scale can be used to crush competitors. MS may have figured out that it can leapfrog the current state-of-the-art by guaranteeing volume to manufacturers of new technology. If so, watch out - they might use this to springboard a play out of Apple's book.

    Imagine if Longhorn is released at the same time as a PC that is built out of the same contracted parts (but perhaps more of them and higher clocked) as the XBox 360. MS getting into the hardware business with a system a generation ahead of everyone else?

    Frankly, the idea terrifies me. But I wouldn't put it past Bill. He is watching Apple and doesn't want his old nemesis to stomp on his pride anymore.

    Whatever the case, this should be interesting...

    --
    The reason that it can be true that 1+1 > 2 is that very peculiar nonzero value of the + operator
    1. Re:Economies of scale by Pepsi__Blue · · Score: 2, Insightful

      30 Million consoles? No way, thats around 1 X-Box 360 for every 10 people in the United States, including the homeless. If I remember correctly (somebody can google if they want) X-Box reached it's 20 million mark globally in January 2005. You are correct that mass production can lower costs significantly, but unless they build millions and millions of X-Box 360s this year and just keep them in a warehouse until they run out, mass production will not lower costs as much as you believe. It's not just about how many you make, but also about the rate at which you make them. Also, FYI don't believe that X-Box 360 will sell as fast as the original X-Box, at least where I live most people were severly disappointed with the X-Box and don't plan to buy an X-Box 360, this is also the feeling I get from talking to friends in other parts of the country.

      Also, I doubt that MS will release a PC, they have no expierence in the area and will piss of several of thier supporters (i.e. Dell, Compaq, E Machines, other major PC companies). In addition, I believe I read somewhere that the processor used in the X-Box 360 will be heavily customized so that it will work very inefficently as a CPU for a desktop computer. This technology isn't that advanced really, AMD is just skipping triple core CPUs, as they have announced a quad core for 2007.

    2. Re:Economies of scale by DeadScreenSky · · Score: 1

      Also, FYI don't believe that X-Box 360 will sell as fast as the original X-Box, at least where I live most people were severly disappointed with the X-Box and don't plan to buy an X-Box 360, this is also the feeling I get from talking to friends in other parts of the country.

      Interesting. Where I live it's the exact opposite. The Xbox convinced a lot of people that MS was for real in this whole console business. Even just compare the amount of respect it tends to get now on Slashdot of all places (vacation home of POGs and anti-MS people alike), whereas before its release and even for sometime after the Xbox was routinely slammed by practically everybody on here.

      This technology isn't that advanced really, AMD is just skipping triple core CPUs, as they have announced a quad core for 2007.

      Great argument. Because AMD is planning to release a better CPU in 2007 the CPU that MS is selling in 2005 isn't advanced? (Are you just doing the whole anti-Xbox troll thing?)

      You are correct the CPU probably won't be that great for desktop usage, but you hardly need much power for that anyways. For games it will be extremely powerful, and that's basically what you need the power for on a consumer PC, too. I'm not convinced it (or a derivative of it) will be used for desktops, but I think you overstate the problems with doing that.

      --
      There is no excellent beauty that hath not some strangeness in the proportion. -- Francis Bacon
  28. Re:Nothing shocking by bassakward · · Score: 1

    Two comments: 1) There are those who want the most tricked-out Xbox 360 possible, even if it costs $1000 in components 2) 3 years later I can probabbly get a graphics card with twice the specs for $100.

  29. Upgrade? by composer777 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's a game console. Software makers tune the software to the hardware itself. The only reason that I've ever needed to upgrade my PC is that it was running the software too slowly. I don't see this being a problem with a game console.

  30. Re:Detachable HardDrive by UWC · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I can't wait until 40GB of flash memory is cheaper than a 40GB hard drive!

    I still love how console memory cards are about the worst price on flash memory you can get these days. Sony's are occasionally on sale for $20 (from their normal retail price of $25), and have "8MB" emblazoned on them for all to see.

    Meanwhile, a couple of aisles over at Wal-Mart, you can get a 512MB CompactFlash card for $30.

  31. Not a DVD-RW drive by TD-2779 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Support for DVD-R/RW does NOT means a DVD-RW drive.

  32. DVD-RW?! by tootbrush · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Do we have to save on DVDs now?

  33. Nice specs.. by CptnSbaitso · · Score: 1

    Can't wait to see it under Linux. Does anyone know if the 3 USB ports are real, or are they fake ones like on the current XBox?

  34. Re:CD-RW?! Yeah right... by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1

    You're forgetting that Microsoft will control the hardware on this device, and it will have strong Digital Rights Management. The ability to burn copies of stuff MS sold you onto a CD/DVD (that maybe only plays on an XBox?) then looks more likely.

    --
    "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  35. Re:Sounds impressive but ... by UWC · · Score: 1
    Now imagine RE4 in 720p or 1080i anti-aliased and with all kinds of shaders and bump maps on the character models.

    Or Half-Life 2 at 1280x720 at 60fps on a $300 machine.

  36. Re:That is impressive by SunFan · · Score: 1


    Microsoft is likely ramping up production _now_ to have enough in stock for the first few months of sales.

    --
    -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
  37. Re:Customizable face plates?? by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

    This is to appeal to the same people that put neon lights in their computer cases, which is a pretty decent percentage of the nerd population.

    It'll also probably appeal to the MODZZZZZZZZZZZ IMPORT-RACING!!!!!1 crowd.

  38. DVDs? by AztecL0B0 · · Score: 1

    I know most console games aren't that large and those that are, use 2 discs, but HD content takes ALOT of space even if its encoded with H.264 codec. MGS4 could easily take 12 GBs if the FMVs are in HD. Microsoft would be really stupid if they would give all the horsepower to create HD content and give you a tiny space to put it in.

    1 Hour of HD video(H.264) = 2.67 GB.

    I doubt they are going to use DVD media, but if they are, I will be first one laughing at them.

    And 3 cores for PPC would be the greatest achievement known to man (slashdot man). 2 cores I believe, but 3, no. IBM has not been able to even make dual core G5s.

    --
    Susanna: NO! A si NO. Octavio: Pos...entonces como?
    1. Re:DVDs? by amliebsch · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I doubt they are going to use DVD media

      I'm sure they will. They don't have the experience that Sony does to create their own, proprietary format, and the units have to be built now, before the next-gen format is settled. Sometimes you have to go with the best you have, and right now that's standard DVD. And why not? Plays people's existing library of movies, probably with HD pull-up, and is still plenty for game content. Still "good enough" for playing other compressed HD video - WMV-HD, for example.

      Besides, I highly doubt Microsoft wants you to use the gaming console for "content creation" or even movie playback. That's what Windows MCE is for.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
  39. Re:Sounds impressive but ... by UWC · · Score: 1

    I forgot to note that the $300 machine comes with the OS, so you don't have to buy (pirate) it yourself.

  40. Re:Customizable face plates?? by bynary · · Score: 1

    Last time I checked, cell-phone faceplates were quite the hot commodity. I'm taking a shot in the dark here, but might this not appeal more to the Japanese gaming community? They really seem to be into customizing alot more than their American or European counterparts.

    --
    http://www.bynarystudio.com
  41. Re:Sounds impressive but ... by Ark42 · · Score: 1

    Of course, once you throw in the other 3 players on any game, you are down to 640x360 or less, depending on if your TV really supports 1280x720 (many LCD/Plasma TVs seem to actually have only 1024 pixels across)
    And 1080i only gets you to 960x270 @ 60fps.
    We're really going to need to get TVs up to about 1440p or so, and have the TVs be affordable too, before 4-player games really start to look good.

  42. 512 G? by koekepeer · · Score: 1

    "...and have 512 GDDR3 RAM."

    that would be 512 M GDDR3 RAM i presume

    else i'd be really impressed *grin*

  43. Re:Sounds impressive but ... by UWC · · Score: 1
    Agreed. Now go play a 4-player split-screen game on a PC. Oh, yeah, nevermind.

    I'll admit that I've never been a fan of split-screen, maybe specifically because I was used to PC resolution advantages. Whatever the reason, my first exposure to 4-player Goldeneye was one of mild surprise that people devoted considerable time to playing it.

    That said, I think I can get very used to playing something at 640x360. That's better than standard TVs fullscreen, isn't it? I hope that, by the time the 360 comes out, I'll have a 720p projector (there's apparently a very nice Panasonic one that can be obtained for under $2000, which is more than can be said of 720p LCD TVs of considerable size).

    Even at that, your particular argument doesn't really make sense to me; decent-resolution split-screen isn't an advantage PCs offer, and online play is going to be a big feature of a lot of games in the upcoming console generation. Split-screen started initially out of necessity, and only continues because it can still be fun, and much more economical, to have several people crowded around a single screen. With HD, it'll be even better, but online play renders it nonessential.

  44. Re:I was thinking the same thing.. by amliebsch · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The next GTA game is slated for PS3 exclusive, and they expect to fill the disc.

    They expect to fill a 25+ GB Blu-Ray disc? With what, hours and hours of MPEG-2 HD cutscenes? Textures? Half-Life 2, with all of its better-than-HD textures, fit easily on a standard DVD. PC games have barely been released standard on DVD for a year or so, and you seriously think console games are going to need Blu-Ray? Time for a sanity check.

    Anyways, if - IF - they needed more than the 8 or so GB available on a dual-layer DVD, you port it to Xbox by including >1 disc, and store some of the game data on the hard drive.

    --
    If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
  45. Re:I was thinking the same thing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "How will this ever get ported to the XBox? Just cut everything out?"

    Why would Rockstar bother with the next xbox?

    Perhaps late in its life if the xbox 360 gets up to 10 to 15 million units they will start putting out ports. The 85 million PS2s and the 85 million PS3s that will be bought over the next five years are Rockstar's prime focus.

    Rockstar isn't in the business of providing welfare for xbox owners.

  46. Re:Sounds impressive but ... by Ark42 · · Score: 1


    I don't particularly like split-screen. It especially ruins fps type games when people just cheat and look at your screen, amoung other things. PCs don't split screen because everybody is usually on their own unit, as it should be for those types of games. Multiplayer console games are best when you all share one screen, or take turns, or some other non-split arragement.
    Standard TV is 480i which is 720x240 @ 60fps. (The f technically stands for fields, not frames then, but that hardly matters.) Whenever you see the little "i" instead of a "p", divide the height by 2, its much easier to compare then. Many regular TVs have a hard time doing more then 400x300 overall though (400x150 after you take into consideration interlacing). So many people are effectively playing Halo at around 200x75 @ 60fps per-player, but its aliased down from 360x120.

    Really though, HDTV will be a big step forward, but the big factor is the TV price, not if the console supports it. Right now almost all of my Gamecube games support 480p (720x480) which is a huge improvement from 480i (720x240) but the cost of a EDTV with progressive scan support is out of my range still when the console cost me $99 and games cost $10-$20 typically.

  47. Re:Detachable HardDrive by Tsunayoshi · · Score: 1

    So you do what my friend did (and I am about to do) and take an old controller cable, splice it into a regular usb cable and attach your xxxmb thumbdrive to it and there you go. The controller ports on the Xbox are standard USB with proprietary connectors.

    The Xbox memory cards are nothing but a USB device with a funky connector that plugs into your controller's USB hub.

    --
    "Get a bicycle. You will not regret it, if you live." - Mark Twain, "Taming the Bicycle"
  48. Re:CD-RW?! Yeah right... by sho222 · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure the "Support for ... CD-RW .. " line just means that it will be able to read those formats, not write to them.

  49. Improved Disc Speed? by robbway · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As I play Forza, I wonder about disc read speed. Forza loads forever. If complicated and detailed games will be common--and I'm all for it--some optimization needs to be done. Also, in the realm of PS2 downward compatability, will the improved speed enhance load times of XBox games?

  50. Re:I was thinking the same thing.. by forkazoo · · Score: 1

    With lots of expansive, detailed content, I would not be surprised at all if they could fill up a BluRay. Use procedural algorithms to make a stupidly detailed city, and make like the entire state that city is in. Then, store it in a stupidly verbose format similar to the following:

    ---------------- // The following section declares a point that is part of the current triangle:: // The following floating point value indicates the X axis value of a point:
    1.0000000245 // The following floating point value indicates the Y axis value of a point:
    1.000000784 // The following floating point value indicates the Z axis value of a point:
    1.00000358 // The following floating point value indicates the unused homogenous coordinate:
    1.0000000000 // This concludes the point. Points are very cool. The next section will have another point.
    ----------------------
    Multiply by three to get a triangle, use a few billion triangles, and then you can advertise the fact that you used a whole BluRay when telling people to buy your game because it is so immersive!

    Never underestimate the power of marketing to cause stupid things to occur!

  51. Re:No Backwards Compatability??? by mconeone · · Score: 1

    * No physics processing unit - lame

    Why bother with a physics processor when you have a 3 core 3.2 Ghz one?

  52. MNz and Dots by nick_davison · · Score: 1

    You idiot. It's clearly Minnesotan's per second! If you can't speak the l33t speak, you shouldn't be on slashdot!

    Either that, or gaminghorizon needs to either wait for the email version of the press release to cut and paste or by a better OCR program for printed ones that can tell Ns from Hs.

    As for dots, they're clearly exploring new technologies like Nintendo is rumored to be doing with 3D. In this case it's evidently something based off of Dot Matrix technology. This assumption can be backed up by the need for 256+ audio channels - no one needs that much sound unless they're powering a dot matrix.

  53. Re:nice specs by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

    LOL. The DS to my surprise is getting such weak feedbacks even though it is probably tie with hardware sales with the PSP.

    Anyways the region bullshit is too much, I agree. They should have standardized on regular movies, not UMD format either.

  54. Price? Anyone? Bueller? by aliens · · Score: 1

    Yeah those specs are freaking amazing, but uh, it's a console right? How much are they debuting this at? $900?

    --
    -- taking over the world, we are.
    1. Re:Price? Anyone? Bueller? by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      Not that much if they want to sell lots of em. Try $350 or $300. The Saturn had to quickly drop to $300 after its $400 debut. The 3DO died after opening at $700.

  55. Re:I was thinking the same thing.. by ubrkl · · Score: 1

    I think the GTA games "cheat" with their content by licensing loads and loads of good music. The last GTA game came with an 8 CD soundtrack, which was awesome. Most people I know have a collection of music that's > 25gb compressed.

  56. Re:CD-RW?! Yeah right... by ThePolkapunk · · Score: 1

    Sorry, made a mistake, it actually reads DVD-R/RW. Seeing as how the XBOX 360 uses a DVD drive, that should be large enough to stick a game on two DVD's. More than easy enough to make pirating through the system worthwhile.

    --
    Dear diary: Today I stuffed some dolls full of dead rats I put in the blender.
  57. Re:Customizable face plates?? by fwitness · · Score: 1

    The last time you checked must be 2000 then, when every mall had 10 cell phone faceplate 'stores'.

    Your point is still valid, just a little out of date.

    --
    -- I have fans? Wow.
  58. Re:CD-RW?! Yeah right... by drjenk · · Score: 1

    Yes that is what I took it as too. Would be pretty stupid to include a writeable dvd drive, the first mod will be an xbox game copy machine.

  59. Wrong by News+for+nerds · · Score: 1

    >It might as well be. As far as I can tell, each
    >core in the XBOX360 should be significantly faster >than a seperate PPC970.

    No way. PPC970 has out-of-order execution while Xbox360 CPU is in-order, so PPC970 is generally faster to execute most applications. Xbox360 CPU may be faster only when it's clocked significantly higher than PPC970 or when it has fatter SIMD (AltiVec) registers.

  60. 5 words "Support for 4 wireless controllers"??? by gmezero · · Score: 1

    While I'm quite impressed myself with the specs and the fact that they're going wireless with the controllers... I had this bizarre hope that going to purely wireless controllers would end the stupid limitation of 4 players max on the system. I have five members in my family. We play FIVE player games on the Saturn, Turbo Grafx, and PlayStation systems. I would like to play five player games on new my systems if the hardware guys would get their heads out of their asses.

    I also hope this wireless crap like the current crop of 3rd party X-Box controllers. I have so much interference in my neighborhood that none of them work reliably (haven't tried the bluetooth ones yet though). On the other hand, my WaveBird controllers have never failed to perform. Hmmm...

  61. Noise by KrunZ · · Score: 3, Funny

    "3 symmetrical cores at 3.2 GHz each"
    The heat is on. I guess the Xbox fanboys finally will live up to their name.

  62. Dear Fanboys.... you missed a few things... by Foo2rama · · Score: 1

    Assuming that this info is correct. It looks like xbox live will require the HD. Considering how integrated the HD looks, what makes you think that all 360's will not have an included HD? But ahh here is the kicker could a dvd/rw be used instead of the HD????? hmm folks could it work? So I guess the 360 hd is still up in the air. There is nothing about backward combatibility... but I will bet that MS will have it, the backlash will be to big not to have implemented it. As for the speed vs the cell. Well the first of a generation usally sells the best. Iomega Jazz vs the Syquest Syjet? the jet was way better from a larger company that had dominanted removeable media with syquest drives, but Iomega beat them to market with the jazz which was slower, more expensive, small capacity, and more prone to disk failure. Iomegas hard start.. 3 months. Where is syquest now? Speed vs the PS3 with the cell is a non-starter, it doesn't matter. MS will beat Sony out in this generation of consoles.

    --


    ---In a time of Chimpanzees I was a Monkey.
    1. Re:Dear Fanboys.... you missed a few things... by Foo2rama · · Score: 1



      Also the cell is going to be very very good at graphics, but how about physics calcs? The next gen of games will no longer be graded on graphics, but on the realism of the world and that implies physics calcs. Cell is skewed to graphics whereas the ppc cores with the ati card will be able to handle complex physics better.

      --


      ---In a time of Chimpanzees I was a Monkey.
    2. Re:Dear Fanboys.... you missed a few things... by yakitori · · Score: 1
      Yes, much like the Sega Dreamcast beat out the Sony Playstation 2. Or, ummm, the Sega Saturn beat out the Sony Playstation. Hmmm, or the Sega Genesis dominated the Super Nintendo. 3D0 can't miss with thier specs? Neo-Geo anyone? Amiga CD32 or Atari Panther?

      Software, software.. It always comes down to software. Why aren't launch titles getting "leaked" out all over the press every 2 days? And with these "specs", how much will this unit cost? $500? $699? Maybe $360?

    3. Re:Dear Fanboys.... you missed a few things... by inkdesign · · Score: 1
      "Considering how integrated the HD looks, what makes you think that all 360's will not have an included HD?"

      I don't agree.. Based on the photos seen thus far, the hard drive looks removable. Also, were it a standard component, why put it outside the case (with an LCD display no less??)

    4. Re:Dear Fanboys.... you missed a few things... by inkdesign · · Score: 1

      LED that is... :0]

    5. Re:Dear Fanboys.... you missed a few things... by jmole · · Score: 1

      ... yea and Japan will welcome their Xbox overloards...

    6. Re:Dear Fanboys.... you missed a few things... by Foo2rama · · Score: 1

      Easy so you could remove it and, take it over to another 360. Or hook it up to a pc.

      --


      ---In a time of Chimpanzees I was a Monkey.
  63. This will never happen but... by el_womble · · Score: 1

    I would LMAO if Apple 'leaked' a copy of tiger that ran on this baby. This would make a fantastic xserve farm machine, especially at the loss-leader prices these will inevitably ship for. Does this post fall into the "imaging a beowulf cluster..." catergory?

    --
    Scared of flying, pointy things snce 1979!
  64. Oh there's always something to fill the space with by goldcd · · Score: 1

    For example you could ship a single multilanguage disk. Whilst the space for dialogue isn't going to fill a blu-ray disk, if you re-rendered all the cut scenes to lip-synch to the audio, then you've suddenly got a lot of data.
    You can also use surplus space to compensate for CPU - why waste resource decompressing something, when it can be spooled off raw?
    We've heard the same argument when CDs came out, when DVDs came out etc etc. Having the extra space loses you nothing and gives the developer an opportunity to offer you something you didn't have before.

  65. Re:Customizable face plates?? by Jack+Sparrow · · Score: 1

    Is this to appeal to 12 year old girls??? Seriously, is somebody going to change the color of the X-box to correspond to either red or blue based on their Halo team color?

    Maybe.. If they want, they will have the option and that is important. I want to show off my personality through my xbox. I will have a new face plate every year based on whatever..

    [Back to real mode] Some of us have wives that want the hardware to go with the furniture and the wall color and it is hell lot easier to change the xbox plate to match the walls than the other way round.

  66. Re:I was thinking the same thing.. by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1
    They expect to fill a 25+ GB Blu-Ray disc? With what, hours and hours of MPEG-2 HD cutscenes? Textures? Half-Life 2, with all of its better-than-HD textures, fit easily on a standard DVD.


    Not entirely true.

    Half-Life install (assuming all of the files were on the DVD and not Steam) would fit on a DVD but at that point the files are compressed. Half-Life 2 uncompressed (ie, what's on the hard drive) is fairly big (more than a DVD).

    Take "Far Cry" for example: that thing requires an insane amount of hard drive space for a full install (much more than 4.75GB).

    If they want games to be more complex and what-not to take advantage of the more powerful system then they're going to need
    a) more content
    b) larger content
    c) have it uncompressed. (to a degree)

    They may not take up an entire Blue Ray disc, but from a marketing standpoint people aren't going to want to swap 2 (maybe 3) DVD's back and forth to play a game.
  67. Source by superultra · · Score: 1

    The source for these specs? The TeamXbox forums. Now I like the staff of TeamXbox. They have created a pretty reasonable and reliable site. But the forum? Let's take a random sample of thread titles:

    "a guy where at the mtv show!!!"
    "doom 3 @ 400k!!!!!!!!"
    "If I have too buy Batterys to play my games on xbox360"
    "Can Permanant Marker Wreck Discs?"
    "I dreamed I owned an xbox 360 last night"
    "Fisher Price is manufacturing the X360 consoles!"
    [huge sic]

    We need only wait 24 hours before we know the real specs. Maybe these are right, but do you really need to be posting completely speculative specs when the slashdot post is fresh enough that we can all came back and make fun of you if you're wrong?

  68. Re:CD-RW?! Yeah right... by Toddarooski · · Score: 1

    Yeah, if you look at TFA, it says...

    "Support for DVD-video, DVD-Rom, DVD-R/RW, CD-DA, CD-Rom, CD-R, CD-RW, WMA CD, MP3 cd, JPEG photo CD"

    Which the article author reworded as...

    "WiFi ready, DVD-RW, 3 USB ports, and 512 GDDR3 RAM."

    Which the slashdot contributor reworded as...

    "The Xbox 360 iself will have a DVD-RW"

    These are how rumors get started, folks.

    --

    "Do you expect me to talk?" "No, Mr. Bond. I expect you to die!"

  69. Re:Sounds impressive but ... by UWC · · Score: 1
    Alright, I'll just use the number you give me when you call me to let me know that there's a 1080p display that most people will consider affordable. Even 720p/1080i displays can be expensive, but at least you can get a decent-sized one for under $1000.

    Oh yeah, I forgot: Yawn. Can't be elitist without feigning intense boredom.

  70. Re:Customizable face plates?? by Lisandro · · Score: 1

    Never underestimate how much money people will spend to be on the same mass-produced products to be "different."

    Mod +1 Insightful. "Ricers" created a whole new market with that line of thinking; i have a friend who works on a car "tuning" shop and they move quite a lot of money.

    If front plates are customizables, people will buy them like crazy; specially kids. Need proof? Check cellphones.

  71. when will we "own" one... by KillShill · · Score: 1

    i wonder if our overlords will allow us to "own" the hardware we pay good money for in the forseeable future.

    they lock it up tight with DRM and digital signatures to insure that we don't have access to the hardware that we bought. i assume they don't consider us owners, only merely renters.

    now that next gen consoles have vast multimedia capabilities, we are essentially being forced legally and technically to give up our rights to our property.

    i want full access to all those cpus and video processors. i paid for them. i DON'T want to copy games or infringe on your lousy copyright, i want direct access to the hardware i purchased.

    and "mod" chips and the like don't count. they are legally obligated to provide any purchaser the ability to program the machine if they so choose.

    and please don't give me the rubbish about how "people except consoles to be closed" deal. if you pay for hardware, it's yours. true, they don't have to provide you documentation, code snippets, etc but they MUST allow you to run unsigned code.

    essentially this is illegal as hell by anyone who has a shred of reason/intelligence. but of course, it'll remain unchanged for some time to come.

    let me reiterate one more time I DO NOT want to infringe copyright, i just want to own my own hardware.

    this is one of the big issues that allows consoles to suck as far as computing devices goes. PC hardware you own, console harware you pay the privilege of renting it.

    not buying it is actually not a solution. because unless there is a written contract which i have signed, i am buying the hardware to be fully usable by me. this is definitely against the law... now we just need someone to challenge it.

    --
    Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
  72. Re:nice specs by mister_slim · · Score: 1
    Or rpgs, or actions games, or puzzlers, or platformers, or...or...

    Hey, give the PSP some credit. It's got a good puzzler.