Slashdot Mirror


Gates Releases Details on New Mobile OS

rjelks writes "Microsoft's Bill Gates released details about the company's new mobile operating system, code-named Magneto, at the Mobile & Embedded Developers Conference in Las Vegas today. There has been a lot of recent speculation about the new OS. People have been describing it as a possible 'Blackberry killer.' Windows Mobile 2005 will be released to hardware manufacturers immediately. The OS will integrate Smartphone, Pocket PC, and Pocket PC Phone Edition operating systems into one platform. It will also include updates to the mobile versions of Word, Excel and PowerPoint." Relatedly, ZDNet has an interview with Gates about the initiative.

265 comments

  1. The real question: by ErikTheRed · · Score: 1, Funny

    What color is the screen when it crashes?

    --

    Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    1. Re:The real question: by eobanb · · Score: 1

      Isn't Magneto the EVIL one?

      --

      Take off every sig. For great justice.

    2. Re:The real question: by debiansid · · Score: 1, Funny

      Mod Parent Insightful.

      Pretty sure people would want to know that. There's been concerns over the color of the crash screen causing stress to users. They must be allowed to prepare themselves mentally.

  2. Magneto? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    We'd better call the X(org)-Men!

    1. Re:Magneto? by justforaday · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Microsoft: The new Apple wannabe?

      New? Where have you been for the past 20 odd years?

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    2. Re:Magneto? by FidelCatsro · · Score: 2, Funny

      To paraphrase Full metal jacket..

      There are only two types of OS names from microsoft!

      Steers and XPers.

      Which are you son?

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    3. Re:Magneto? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Totally off-topic, I know, but what the fuck kind of word is "relatedly" meant to be?

    4. Re:Magneto? by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      Think on it:

      MicroSoft = Small, limp.

      LongHorn = Big, Bony Stick.

      Magneto = Juice maker

      I think they have a very small^h^h^h^h^hnarrow pe^h^hfocus.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    5. Re:Magneto? by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      How is "Magneto" like "Tiger" or "Panther" or other such Apple codenames?
      It seems like "Longhorn" is closer seeing as it's a an animal.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    6. Re:Magneto? by Bake · · Score: 1

      A better paraphrase would be:

      Only steers and XPers from from Microsoft!
      You don't look like much of a steer so that kinda narrows it down!

    7. Re:Magneto? by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Your right im confusing my paraphrases here . I should of double checked that one

      Gunnery Sergeant Hartman: Holy dog Sh*T. Microsoft? Only steers and XPers come from Microsoft, Private Ballmer. And you don't look much like a steer to me so that kinda narrows it down. Do you suck at *Nix?

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    8. Re:Magneto? by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

      perfectly cromulent?

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
  3. Blackberry killer... by Thud457 · · Score: 5, Funny

    as in "man, this Magneto OS is really killing my Blackberry, It takes 128 MB RAM and a 1gHz processor".

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:Blackberry killer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blackberry Killer, aka Fruit Fucker.

    2. Re:Blackberry killer... by yiantsbro · · Score: 1

      Fruit Fucker, aka Juicer

    3. Re:Blackberry killer... by cookd · · Score: 1

      Actually, it runs in 32 MB RAM and takes a 200 MHz ARM processor.

      Though that would still kill your blackberry...

      --
      Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    4. Re:Blackberry killer... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      How do you kill something that was never truly alive to begin with?

      I've seen one Blackberry in my entire life, and I wasn't impressed. Wake me up when the revolution's over.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  4. J2ME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about J2ME? It's easy to develop for and already exists on millions of phones and other devices...

  5. Magneto by Rei · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... so-called because it has a nasty tendancy to wipe your hard drive every so often. I still wish Microsoft would go back to the naming scheme used with WinCE - naming their operating systems after their users' first reactions.

    --
    I'm you from the future! We have to finish our time machine before the Angels of Destruction find the portal!
    1. Re:Magneto by Metteyya · · Score: 5, Funny

      If they'd really used this naming scheme, most Windows version should be named WinWTF.

    2. Re:magneto by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 2, Funny

      The phone does everything you want it to already!

      A phone manipulates the magnetic fields around you. That's how it works.

      If the car's in your way on the freeway, just hold the phone up to your ear, weave around in traffic, and speed up. They'll move.

      If you can't reach the remote, I'm sure that there's a hack to use the phone as a remote. If there isn't one yet, there will be soon enough.

      As for mutants, it's pre-emptive. For proof, I say you don't see any metal-skeletoned mutants around here, do you?

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    3. Re:Magneto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "naming their operating systems after their users' first reactions."

      But they did it... The first reaction of the user is to put a magnet in the Hard Disk :)

    4. Re:Magneto by sharkey · · Score: 1
      naming their operating systems after their users' first reactions.

      And the OS theme songs, too- "You make a grown man cry!"

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    5. Re:Magneto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      make sure it is alway kept at a good distance from your wallet. Don't want to wipe the magnetic strips on your plastics.

    6. Re:Magneto by Glitch010101 · · Score: 1

      They did. It's Win"DOH!"s after all.

  6. Microsoft by mfh · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Microsoft: Get ONE right, before you try and do so much.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I think we just discovered why you're not worth 50 billion dollars, but do have a Slashdot UID in the 50's.

    2. Re:Microsoft by Stibidor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ever heard of multiple streams of income? What does it matter to them if any of their OSes work perfectly, so long as people are buying them?

    3. Re:Microsoft by Stibidor · · Score: 1

      That was weird. I thought I was replying to someone's plea for MS to get ONE OS working right before working on others. But when I posted, the parent was gone. Strange things are afoot at the Circle K...

    4. Re:Microsoft by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Uh, if they ever shipped an OS that worked perfectly, then they couldn't get you to pay for an upgrade by telling you how much the previous release sucked, now could they? You need to stop thinking like a customer and start thinking like a marketer...

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    5. Re:Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try browsing at a level below 1.

    6. Re:Microsoft by Stibidor · · Score: 1

      Thanks! :)

  7. Blackberry killer by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 2, Funny

    People have been describing it as a possible 'Blackberry killer.'

    10 bucks says it turns out to be more useful in the weed-killing sense...

    1. Re:Blackberry Killer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a psycho killer?
      Qu'est Que C'est

    2. Re:Blackberry Killer by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean, I should stop referring to Linux as "the Windows killer"?!?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    3. Re:Blackberry Killer by eobanb · · Score: 1

      I heard their new slogan is, "10,000 Critical Objects, In Your Pocket."

      --

      Take off every sig. For great justice.

    4. Re:Blackberry Killer by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

      [quote] OK, I think its safe to disregard this product and the person calling it that. Whenever something is described as an XKiller, it never kills product X and such claims are usually FUD or just hype.[/quote]

      AHHHH Crap! You mean the sub 500 Mac won't kill off the pc's then? //stomps off

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    5. Re:Blackberry Killer by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, you should. Linux isn't going to kill Windows any time soon, if ever. It's too deeply entrenched and too many people and companies have too much invested in it.

    6. Re:Blackberry Killer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translation: Most people are lazy computer illiterate half-wits who happily open email messages with attachments named "Anna.Kournikova.Rug.Munching.jpg.vbs"

    7. Re:Blackberry Killer by kevlar · · Score: 1

      The only thing that would prevent this OS from being a blackberry killer is the lack of "blackberry style" device form factors. Other than that, it does everything a blackberry does, and then some.

    8. Re:Blackberry Killer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A fi fi fi FI a Fuh Fuh FI FIIII

    9. Re:Blackberry Killer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Linux isn't alone. Linux has friends in a few corporations who exist on the same scale as Microsoft and will cut Microsoft down right at the base, at the zero price point. It's inevitable.

      Hell, even Solaris is free, now.

      I'd like anyone to try to defend the long-term strength of Microsoft's revenue base. It's impossible. From mainframes to minis to workstations to Windows NT PCs to Linux/Solaris PCs, cheaper and "good enough" is an unstoppable force.

      If Microsoft weren't 99% software, I'd cut them some slack, but they simply have nothing to fall back on like IBM and Sun do.

    10. Re:Blackberry killer by phoenix42 · · Score: 1

      using it would almost certainly kill your buzz.

      --
      forty-two
    11. Re:Blackberry Killer by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... or are you just happy to see me?

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    12. Re:Blackberry Killer by David+Leppik · · Score: 1
      OK, I think its safe to disregard this product and the person calling it that. Whenever something is described as an XKiller, it never kills product X and such claims are usually FUD or just hype.
      Except of course for Mozilla, the Mosaic killer. That was the code name, the commercial name was Netscape.
    13. Re:Blackberry killer by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't know about killing Blackberries, but it will certainly kill your wallet.

      How many manufacturers will have software upgrades to allow users to install the new OS version on their PDAs/Smartphones? I'm willing to bet "Very, very few".

      Most manufacturers are going to insist that users buy an entirely new device to get the benefits from this new version. So instead of paying $50-150 for a new OS, you're going to be paying hundreds for an entirely new bit of hardware.

      Software upgrades drive sales, regardless of if the old hardware would actually support the new OS anyway.

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    14. Re:Blackberry killer by CaymanIslandCarpedie · · Score: 1

      I don't have any firm numbers, but Dell and HP have already announced they will let customers upgrade to this new version. Nothing against the post referenced originally but I think this one gives more info. With two big-boys doing this, I'd think most others would have to do the same.

      So I think most PDAs will be able to be upgraded. I'd tend to think you are probably right when it comes to phones though.

      --
      "reality has a well-known liberal bias" - Steven Colbert
    15. Re:Blackberry Killer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if this was another quote from Delio...

    16. Re:Blackberry Killer by MojoStan · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Whenever something is described as an XKiller, it never kills product X and such claims are usually FUD or just hype.

      Voodoo Killer? 3Dfx's Voodoo cards were the first products I can remember being targeted for "killing." Graphics history buffs know Voodoo got eaten by NVIDIA.

      Unless the market leader makes it very difficult and/or inconvenient to switch, they can get killed. What makes the Blackberry so un-killable?

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

    17. Re:Blackberry Killer by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      like pocket pc killed of palm?

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    18. Re:Blackberry Killer by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      The only thing that would prevent this OS from being a blackberry killer is the lack of "blackberry style" device form factors.

      I'm confused. The new OS is an merger of the Smartphone OS and the Windows Mobile OS. What form factor does blackberry come in that isn't all ready available with the existing mobile OS from M$?

    19. Re:Blackberry Killer by kevlar · · Score: 1

      I'm simply saying that if you compare what the WM OS is capable of, versus what a Blackberry is capable of, the WM OS has the same (and better) features implemented.

      The difference between your typical blackberry and your typical Smartphone/PocketPC is the form factor of the devices. Blackberrys always have a keyboard (people love keyboards). PocketPC and Smartphones generally do not have keyboards. My point is that the form factor is the only outstanding delta between Blackberry and Windows Mobile with respect to functionality.

      When OEMs start making Windows Mobile devices with form factors similar to the Blackberry, you'll start to see the Blackberry go the way of the doe-doe. I'm predicting this will happen very soon.

    20. Re:Blackberry Killer by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      When OEMs start making Windows Mobile devices with form factors similar to the Blackberry, you'll start to see the Blackberry go the way of the doe-doe. I'm predicting this will happen very soon.

      Take a look around then, there are numerous WM devices out already that have qwerty keyboards; mine does! :-) When you say very soon, I think 2005 may even be the year for them. As mentioned in the article though, one handed use is key. I can just about get away with it on mine, but it's not designed with that in mind.

    21. Re:Blackberry Killer by rhyno46 · · Score: 0

      Tell that to the old Netscape

    22. Re:Blackberry Killer by tooth · · Score: 1

      Hammer == the iPod killer ... well, anything electrical really :)

  8. Screen Shots of Windows Mobile 5 by davidconger · · Score: 4, Informative

    For more about some of the new features and to see screenshots from Windows Mobile 5 (including ActiveSync 4.0, PowerPoint Mobile, Smartphone User Interface, One-Handed Interface for Pocket PC, Internet Explorer Mobile, Excel Mobile, Word Mobile, and Pocket MSN Client) here: http://www.davespda.com/special/wm5/ There is also improved WMP 10 Mobile DRM support, new photo and video API's for developers, 3G and UMTS support, and more.

    1. Re:Screen Shots of Windows Mobile 5 by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Funny

      One-Handed Interface for Pocket PC

      I'm sure many slashdot readers would like this feature for their desktop machine.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Screen Shots of Windows Mobile 5 by elasticwings · · Score: 1

      Internet Explorer Mobile??? WTF, who wants spyware on their phone?

    3. Re:Screen Shots of Windows Mobile 5 by davidconger · · Score: 1

      That was a sticky comment...

    4. Re:Screen Shots of Windows Mobile 5 by davidconger · · Score: 1

      Internet Explorer Mobile used to be Pocket Internet Explorer. It has been around for a while. Hopefully soon Minimo will be available. How about Mozilla on your Pocket PC: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/minimo/

    5. Re:Screen Shots of Windows Mobile 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is t'issue with LiquidCooled's post?

    6. Re:Screen Shots of Windows Mobile 5 by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      I don't want spyware on my phone. Spammers, scammers and phishers want spyware on your phone. A market segment that Microsoft has served well.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    7. Re:Screen Shots of Windows Mobile 5 by anakin357 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've used a Windows Mobile Smartphone for the past year. Am I concerned about getting spyware on my phone? Not in the least.

      I'll tell you why.

      First off, any program you try to install must be confirmed that you want the application. You (or your carrier) can also set the phone up so it will only accept signed applications, which I beleive means Microsoft approved it for use with the OS.

      Do you worry about getting spyware on an XBox too? Every game that is put out for the XBox is signed by Microsoft as being legit. It's the same deal on MS Smartphone.

      About your comment on Pocket Internet Explorer, Web browsing (no matter what browser you are using) over GPRS (celluar data) is slow. Think around 14.4, dialup speeds. My phone has a 200MHz processor and 32MB of RAM, so that influences how fast pages load, etc.

      So any pages I visit, I goto them for a reason, because I want to view that page, and something important is there. For example while at work I can check on the status of a package on FedEx.com and see if I should go home for lunch and put the package inside the house instead of letting it stay outside for 8 hours.

      I personally do not go browsing or searching for things on my phone that I do not implicitly trust.

      On the otherhand, on my PC with fast internet, I could get a emailed link, get a link sent by a friend saying "hey this is cool"... my PC is so fast compared to a phone that you can click a link, and within seconds your machine is infected.

      The problem is user authentication and proper policy management. For people who use their PC at home, this is a "nuisance" because many people would be using the PC, many people would want to install applications, and for a computer to ask for the master password whenever a program is installed is really just a out there idea. Most people want to be able to install whatever they want, whenever they want and not have to authenticate themselves.

      Mac OS X can be set to authenticate when you install programs, there's no spyware for Macs. Linux authenticates before you start your user session, there's no spyware for Linux.

      Windows for PC is meant to be stupid user friendly. That's what makes it a target for spyware. I talk to people almost daily who have gotten a major infection of spyware on their PC and that's because their 12 year old son installed Kazaa, or downloaded some free smiles, or wanted to check the weather. If there was user authentication on the PC when installing programs, it might be less of a target, because only an authorized user can install things.

      That said, I do install unsigned applications on my phone. But at least I know what I am installing and when.

      Why don't you shut up if you don't have an informed opinion, and I would ask you to call me as know as soon as there's a virus out there that bypasses user authentication and can install it onto my cellphone, but I'll be reading it via RSS -- on my phone.

      --
      http://www.fsckin.com/
    8. Re:Screen Shots of Windows Mobile 5 by FuturePastNow · · Score: 1

      That's what I thought, too ;)

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    9. Re:Screen Shots of Windows Mobile 5 by SunFan · · Score: 1

      I personally do not go browsing or searching for things on my phone that I do not implicitly trust.

      It doesn't matter. Once networked using TCP/IP, the worms come to you. In my personal firewall logs, pretty much all incoming connection attempts are Microsoft-specific regarding that messaging nonsense or filesharing or whatever. If I had a standard Windows machine in the DMZ, it would be toast in no time flat. It probably wouldn't be long before Magneto phones on wireless networks are just as bad.

      Thankfully, my firewall runs BSD...and isn't even x86. The worm bots out there can eat my shorts, for all I care.

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
  9. PUSH by whackco · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When they have effective PUSH EMail built into Exchange 2k3 in SP2 it WILL kill blackberry. I for one HATE the BB Ent Srv.

    That said....flame away

    1. Re:PUSH by Locke2005 · · Score: 2

      Yeah, push email will be just great when somebody mail-bombs you with more email than you have memory in your PDA to store...

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:PUSH by schapman · · Score: 1

      I for one also HATE the BES :)

      --
      Wouldnt you like to be a pepper too?
    3. Re:PUSH by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well to join the BFJ, you'd *really* have to hate the BES!

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    4. Re:PUSH by apnar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It already exisits and works well. If you use a recent windows mobile phone or PDA with Exchange 2k3 SP2 you can set it up. The way it works is the exchange server will send your mobile an SMS when it gets a new message. This SMS is eaten by your phone and you never see it, it does trigger active sync in your phone though which then downloads the new messasge. Works well. You can read up on it here:

      http://www.microsoft.com/technet/community/chats/t rans/exchange/exc0428.mspx

    5. Re:PUSH by whackco · · Score: 1

      I think you are mistaken though, from my understanding they are doing away with the OMA model completely and building it around real push technology...

    6. Re:PUSH by praxis · · Score: 1

      That's why you sync your inbox and set up proper filters at the mail server (for spam, virus, phishing, etc, emails) at the client (for organization into projects, etc). That way what comes through to your phone is deemed important enough to go directly into your sparsly populated inbox (and Magneto device).

    7. Re:PUSH by CaymanIslandCarpedie · · Score: 1

      I think you are 100% correct. I don't see this release REALLY being aimed at RIM. There are some improved features and you can kind of see that in the next couple years they probably have plans to aim for RIM, but for now I don't think that is the main goal. Your comment on push exchange integration I think is probably right on and we may see it before long. Along with that they will also need (ok maybe not need but it would help) DELL or some other hardware vendor to create a small form device to house this functionailty. Maybe people will get used to using a PDA like a Blackberry, but for me PDAs are still a bit too big and fragile (though getting better) to just wear on my hip everywhere I go like I can (almost) do with a Blackberry.

      That said, it seems this release is actually more aimed at Nokia than RIM. Article

      --
      "reality has a well-known liberal bias" - Steven Colbert
    8. Re:PUSH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you've ever actually used an exhange server to manage a real amount of email you'd know that the number of filters you can store on the server side is fucking pathetic

    9. Re:PUSH by jacobrich · · Score: 1

      I for (another one) hate BES, too. I administer a BES 4 system, it was difficult to set-up and support from RIM was difficult to get.

    10. Re:PUSH by praxis · · Score: 1

      Really, what's the limit? I currently have twenty rules which do everything I need them to do. Granted, I only do organizational filtering since malicious email filtering is done elsewhere. Am I going to hit it soon?

    11. Re:PUSH by schapman · · Score: 1
      I didnt find the BES 4.0 install all so bad. Its more a matter of the Java memory leak that they say existed in a previous JVM but I still seem to find. And the activation process can cause headaches (especially w/ the BES and Exchange 2003 pairup). It's pretty bad when we have abotu 15 blackberry users so far and I have to

      1) add exchange/AD user and wait 20 minutes

      2) add BES user and wait 15 minutes

      3) Enterprise act new bb and wait 15 minutes

      --
      Wouldnt you like to be a pepper too?
    12. Re:PUSH by hamsterboy · · Score: 1

      Wish granted. I'm at the conference, and one of the biggest features they're touting in WM5 is Office integration. There's what amounts to a full Outlook client included with the OS.

      Hamster

    13. Re:PUSH by sdawara · · Score: 1

      Your premise is that the Blackberry revenue stream depends on prosumers who want to reach their corporate Exchange 2k3 servers. Thats only ~ 1/9th of the picture.

      - Santosh

      --
      Santosh Dawara
    14. Re:PUSH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In our shop, the BES install wasn't so bad either. And aside from problems our users (i.e., bankers, duh) have been experiencing in learning how to use their BB's, BES works pretty well. But I think that's because we run it with Lotus Notes rather than MS Exchange.

  10. Let me... by Metteyya · · Score: 0, Troll

    Yes, but does it run Linux?

    Oh, wait...

    1. Re:Let me... by mattdev121 · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      mattdev@server$ touch /dev/genitals
      cannot touch `/dev/genitals': Permission denied
    2. Re:Let me... by aweiland · · Score: 1

      I bet it'll boot NetBSD!

  11. Combining everything huh? by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 2, Funny

    A wise move, consolidate all your security holes, viruses, worms, BSODs and spyware all under one OS umbrella!

    Smart MS, very very smart.

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
    1. Re:Combining everything huh? by eobanb · · Score: 1

      And then, infect your car!

      --

      Take off every sig. For great justice.

  12. Blackberry Killer by kevin_conaway · · Score: 4, Insightful

    OK, I think its safe to disregard this product and the person calling it that. Whenever something is described as an XKiller, it never kills product X and such claims are usually FUD or just hype.

  13. On a laptop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if it would work on a laptop? It is mobile after all...

  14. More on Magneto: by mr_don't · · Score: 5, Funny

    More information on Magneto:

    Years later Magnus reemerged as Magneto, who was determined to conquer the human race to prevent their oppression of mutants. Xavier's original team of X-Men thwarted his first public move in his war with humanity, the takeover of the Cape Citadel missile base. When they next clashed, Magneto was leading his original Brotherhood of Evil Mutants, which included Wanda and Pietro, now known as the Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver.

    Not until years later would Magneto learn that they were actually his children. At one point Magneto genetically engineered a being called Alpha the Ultimate Mutant, who rebelled against him and turned Magneto back into an infant. Magneto thereafter had a series of battles with Xavier's new team of X-Men.

    1. Re:More on Magneto: by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that was the first thing I thought of. The second thing I thought was that when Apple runs out of cat names, maybe they should go with other animal names for the OS releases like ... oh, say ... "Wolverine."

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    2. Re:More on Magneto: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. A device with hidden razor blades that pop out whenevever you press a button. Great.

    3. Re:More on Magneto: by Mikito · · Score: 2, Funny

      The grandparent post is simultaneously funny and informative.

      Other computer software companies would do well to follow Microsoft's lead and use naming schemes based on mythology (Cyclops, Phoenix), natural phenomena (Storm, Sunspot not an X-man last time I checked, many years ago ) and as someone else said, animals.

      Microsoft could have picked some really off the wall names from comic books...Galactus or the Silver Surfer.

      Oh, here's one that would strike a chord on /. :

      Penguin.

      --
      Anakin Simpson: If you're not with me, then you're my enemy--ooh, donuts!
    4. Re:More on Magneto: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sunspot isn't exactly an X-Man, but he is one of the founders of New Mutants which is pretty much the farm league of X-Men.
      Me, I support naming schemes of incremental numbers. Windows 1, 2, 3, 4 (3.1), 5 (3.11), now which one would the first NT be... Ah, damn, got confused already.

    5. Re:More on Magneto: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other news, Apple announced development on OSX 10.5 "Xavier".

  15. Cool, a blackberry killer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tell you, I have blackberries in my backyard and nothing can kill them.

    1. Re:Cool, a blackberry killer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be one with your econiche. Eat the berries, yummy. Make jam, more good stuff.

  16. In case of Slashdotting... by SoylentOctarine · · Score: 1, Informative

    LAS VEGAS - Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates released details about the company's new mobile operating system code-named "Magneto" during his keynote speech for the Mobile & Embedded Developers Conference.

    "In the past five years, there's been a profound shift in the kind of data and services people access on their mobile devices -- from multimedia to business applications," Gates said. "Windows Mobile 5.0 enables our industry partners to develop exciting new hardware designs and solutions that will revolutionize how customers use mobile devices."

    "Windows Mobile 5.0 is an important evolutionary step for the Windows Mobile platform, which continues to gain traction worldwide," said John Jackson, Yankee Group senior analyst. "Enhancements in the platform give wireless network operators and mobile device vendors the ability to deliver customized, differentiated services and devices, while meeting the market's demand for robust, scalable, segmented offerings."

    Windows Mobile 2005, "Magneto" Details

    This new version of the Windows Mobile software platform delivers on partner requests, including more platform flexibility to customize devices and solutions; productivity enhancements that include updated Microsoft Office software and persistent memory storage for more efficient data management; and a powerful multimedia experience with Windows Media(R) Player 10 Mobile and support for hard drives.

    Enhancements to Windows Mobile 5.0 will include:

    Persistent memory storage. The most requested productivity feature from partners and customers alike, persistent memory storage retains information even when the device's battery is depleted.

    Microsoft Office software for Windows Mobile. Users will be able to view and create charts in Excel Mobile, and edit documents with graphics using Word Mobile while maintaining document formatting with files created on a PC. A new PowerPoint(R) Mobile application has been included for Pocket PC, giving road warriors the ability to view and rehearse presentations.

    Security. Complementing a number of security features already included in the Windows Mobile platform, such as Bluetooth authorization and end-to-end encryption over a virtual private network, Windows Mobile 5.0 has gone through extensive threat-modeling testing and completed the rigorous Microsoft Trustworthy Computing full security review. The platform is also FIPS-140-2-certified, meaning it meets the stringent U.S. government security requirements for IT products.

    Enhanced Multimedia Capabilities

    Windows Media Player 10 Mobile. Customers can enjoy a larger number of protected digital music, video and recorded television files that can be synchronized easily from a PC or downloaded from many Internet-based services and mobile operators' music stores with Windows Media Player 10 Mobile. The updated player also enables synchronization of users' playlists, album art and song ratings. Partners can plug in additional digital rights management (DRM) technologies to help advance their specific media business models.

    Pictures and video. A new pictures and video application will add advanced features such as burst mode and timer function previously found only on high-end digital cameras.

    Extended storage. Additional support for hard drives and Universal Serial Bus (USB) 2.0 will enable people to easily and quickly store large amounts of information -- such as entire digital picture and music libraries -- on a mobile device and synchronize this content with a PC.

    Shoring up the Leaks

    Up until now, details about "Magneto" have been scarce. Microsoft has been busy trying to quiet rumors that have been buzzing around the web. Neowin.com, Engadget.com and Modaco.com all posted leaked information about the new mobile OS.

    Microsoft sent letters to silence the Web sites, claiming that posting screen shots and details of unreleased software violated the company's intellectual property rights. Engadget was the only site that lef

    1. Re:In case of Slashdotting... by SoylentOctarine · · Score: 0

      Hey mods-

      How is this redundant? Overrated, perhaps, but no one had posted the text of the article when I put this up.

  17. Quick, Dial 911!!!! by dfn5 · · Score: 4, Funny
    OK, just as soon as my phone is done rebooting.

    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
    1. Re:Quick, Dial 911!!!! by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 1

      One must wonder if control-alt-delete will be programable for one touch dialing....
      It will be interesting to see how this is recieved in the cell phone community-
      My opinion, and this is from an untrendy, not very cool guy- is that a lot of people who buy cell phones like something trendy and cool, and although we have all known about Apple for decades, a whole generation of younins think apple is a new company (Ipod) and would love an Apple phone- microsoft maybe not so much.
      I would like a better gui on my phone's browser- but if i may be so honest- there are times when I just wish my phone would work as a phone- Im not worried about the options, just want it to work as a phone, no dropped calls, good reception.

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    2. Re:Quick, Dial 911!!!! by brasten · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You joke, but you'd be surprised how often I have to reboot my Symbian phone to get things working properly again.

    3. Re:Quick, Dial 911!!!! by Swamii · · Score: 2, Funny

      Quick, Dial 911!!!!
      OK, just as soon as my phone is done rebooting.


      How horribly ironic it would be if the man in need of an ambulance died while you were rebooting after a blue screen of death.

      --
      Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
    4. Re:Quick, Dial 911!!!! by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

      My friend has a microsoft "wince" phone and it crashes many times each day.

    5. Re:Quick, Dial 911!!!! by MerlinTheWizard · · Score: 1

      Well, I have a friend who has a Dell PDA running Win CE as well. It *does* need rebooting several times a day, because the whole thing freezes every once in a while. It's not lame MS bashing, it's simply the naked reality.

    6. Re:Quick, Dial 911!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's like rain on your wedding day!

    7. Re:Quick, Dial 911!!!! by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      OK, just as soon as my phone is done rebooting

      Actually, as a long time and mostly happy Microsoft phone OS user, it can be a right pain in the ass though thankfully it's rarer and rarer now. However, the way I see it is, these are bleeding edge devices and this sort of thing is to be expected. The first few decades of land lines were ropey, and I personally witnessed some of the problems in the early days of GSM phones. I had a friend that had an analogue mobile at the same time, I swear to god it was like using a CB.

      If you really need a 100% reliable device, do what NASA do and stick with the tried and trusted tech. I've learned to appreciate that my pda has phone features, not the other way around. It's a PDA first, a phone second. Still works very well, and I'm really happy with it (Win Mobile 2003 nowadays).

    8. Re:Quick, Dial 911!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, the way I see it is, these are bleeding edge devices and this sort of thing is to be expected.

      That means Microsoft has been bleeding edge for a good 20 years, now, and is still going strong!

    9. Re:Quick, Dial 911!!!! by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      just like my Treo 650 20 times a day.

  18. Finally the proof : MS IS evil by TekGoNos · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why else would they name their new OS after a super-villain?

    --
    I have discovered a truly remarkable proof for my post which this sig is too small to contain.
    1. Re:Finally the proof : MS IS evil by PaisteUser · · Score: 1

      Why else would they name their new OS after a super-villain?

      Maybe they just love their devices that produce alternating current for distribution to spark plugs, used in the ignition systems of some internal-combustion engines? What could possibly be wrong with that?

      --
      root@allevil:~#
    2. Re:Finally the proof : MS IS evil by MSisEvil · · Score: 1

      I've known this for years....

      Nobody ever listens....

  19. Yayyy!!! by debiansid · · Score: 1

    Now even Pocket PCs can hang :>D

    1. Re:Yayyy!!! by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      They've been able to do that for a while. Mine detests trying to activesync with bluetooth (Will they fix it, for the love of god!)

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  20. Ah, by uberjoe · · Score: 3, Funny

    But will it speak to me in the voice of Ian McKellen?

    --

    The days of the digital watch are numbered.

    1. Re:Ah, by ABaumann · · Score: 1

      Well, the do support gay rights.

  21. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can it control all known metals?

    1. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      No, only the unknown ones.

  22. Magneto? by neuro.slug · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is it just me, or is Microsoft attempting to re-invent their image? "Magneto", like "Underdog" (the new search engine) is definitely a far cry from "Longhorn" in terms of target audience.

    Microsoft: The new Apple wannabe? I dunno.

    -- n

  23. OS's code-named after supervillians... by Bonker · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, that's a good PR move.

    What happened to MS naming their releases after cities?

    Next OS is going to be 'Red Skull', but with none of the anti-semitism that so many would like to accuse MS of.

    After that, look forward to 'Kingpin' OS, with plenty of features to make sure that Microsoft stays at the top of the heap, wink, wink, nudge, nudge.

    The 'Juggernaut' OS will mark MS's return to using the X-Men's enemies as code names, but will also describe the install footprint.

    'Apocalypse' OS will be release immediately after Billy G. has been declared world dictator for life, forever and ever amen.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:OS's code-named after supervillians... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      And while we're at it, OS "Maureen O'Gara"

    2. Re:OS's code-named after supervillians... by sdsichero · · Score: 1

      Oh, all I am hearing here is 'Venom'!

    3. Re:OS's code-named after supervillians... by RealAlaskan · · Score: 1
      'Apocalypse' OS will be release immediately after Billy G. has been declared world dictator for life, forever and ever amen.

      No, 'Apocalypse' will be the MS OS which leads up to that. The release immediately after Billy G. has been declared world dictator for life will be called `Leviathan', named after the ultimate evil.

    4. Re:OS's code-named after supervillians... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anti-semitism? Steve Ballmer is jewish...just for the record.

  24. Re:Quick Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did he specify how much of my soul would be required... would he settle for a virginal sacrifice?

    I've got bad news, really bad news and even worse news:
    The bad news, Yes, he requires a virginal sacrifice.
    The really bad news is its you he requires.
    The worse news is: This doesn't mean you're getting laid!

  25. More Like... by dosle · · Score: 0

    current phone and other portable devices can not operate with the bloat of a Windows release occupies.

    Microsoft did get off to a fairly slow start in the handheld and phone arenas. Why do you think that was? Gates: If you take the handheld space, I wouldn't say we were slow there.

  26. Possible? by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    People have been describing it as a possible 'Blackberry killer.'

    I think that was part of the original script that got cut from the movie; just as Arthur is losing his arms and Ford is turning into a penguin, Microsoft releases a "Blackberry Killer" OS. On the other hand, the Microsoft "iPod killer" was determined to be of such high improbability that it would have occurred before they were rescued from certain death.

    --
    -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
  27. Microsoft name schemes... by Erik+Soderstrom · · Score: 0, Interesting

    I thought Microsoft always codenamed their operating system after cities and locations to avoid getting sued over a name conflict.... Magneto.... X-Men (c) Marvel... ring any bells? Aww, come on!

  28. My bet by c0ldfusi0n · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have $50 on Wheels for that new mobile OS' name.

    ...think about it..

    ...a little bit more..

    There you go!

    --
    A computer makes it possible to do, in half an hour, tasks which were completely unnecessary to do before.
    1. Re:My bet by bhsx · · Score: 1

      OK, I'm a moron. I admit it.
      Now can you break that down for me?
      Seriously, to quote ObviousGuy:
      "I don't get it."

      --
      put the what in the where?
    2. Re:My bet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I don't know. Perhaps it has something to do with re-innovating the wheel?

  29. Looking good... by Cmdr+Whackjob · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm looking to replace the current line of PDA's for our company and this sounds very interesting. Employees are often out of office and an all-in-one device like this will be great for them to keep in touch - and maybe even do a bit of work on.

    1. Re:Looking good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Employees are often out of office and an all-in-one device like this will be great for them to keep in touch - and maybe even do a bit of work on.

      Yes, and since it's from Microsoft, I'm sure your employees will love it-- now they only need one device to crash hard in order to prevent them from working so they can take the afternoon off.

    2. Re:Looking good... by Cmdr+Whackjob · · Score: 1

      Thats very strange that you should say that. We have many machines throughout the company running Linux, Windows 2000 and XP. All machines are kept up to date with the latest patches and it is incredibly rare to hear anyone complaining about crashes. This sort of thing happened with 95 / 98 / ME but not these days if the systems are well run.

      So yes, they probably will love them but not for the reasons you state.

    3. Re:Looking good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > well run.

      You misspelled scheduled reboot......

    4. Re:Looking good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      You must be lucky then. Or have those machines doing nothing at all.

    5. Re:Looking good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Non-laptop mobile devices are terrible for doing work. Outside of phone calls and trivial e-mail and a little web browsing, they are just too limited.

      Laptops with wireless VPN...then you might have something.

  30. In other news.... by Frodo+Crockett · · Score: 1

    Marvel is suing Microsoft for damaging their intellectual property.

    --
    "The newly born animals are then whisked off for a quick run through a giant baking oven." --heard on Food Network
  31. Well by Sv-Manowar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's good to see that they are targetting the Blackberry domination of the market, hopefully it will lead to manufacturers battling to achieve market share, which would mean better products for us, the consumer.

    I just wouldn't want to be beta testing that ;)

  32. Ya know.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm more than a little surprised everyone's not going for the "take over the world and exterminate all humans" route on this one.

  33. magneto by uberjoe · · Score: 1

    I'm not interested unless it can manipulate magnetic fields for me. Car in my way on the freeway, magneto will move it for me. Can't reach the remote, magneto will bring it to me. Need to rip the metallic skeleton from a mutant charging at me, well magneto will do that too.

    --

    The days of the digital watch are numbered.

  34. Nevermind... by __aaitqo8496 · · Score: 1

    So I guess it answers that question: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=148791&cid=124 70295

    Now if they could only make the bundled apps (Pocket Whatever) actually useful. Thus far, I have had to purchase replacements for the crap versions. Of course, I'm still waiting on Minimo.

  35. Re:Quick Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, posting as an AC doesn't do much good when you use manual linebreaks that way. There are not many Slashdotters who post with that style.

  36. Re:Pamela Jones EXPOSED by debiansid · · Score: 1

    Pamela Jones EXPOSED

    I thought this had something to do with an embedded porn viewer in Magneto.

  37. Xavier by bitswapper · · Score: 4, Funny


    Namewars - So now Blackberry needs to come out with Xavier.

    1. Re:Xavier by macintoshguy · · Score: 1

      Haha,yeah. Anyway, I think that Apple did this already. One of their OS releases (System 7.7.5?) was code-named "Al Capone (or Scarface)", just to kind of make it a "Windows killer", since Windows 95 was code-named "Chicago". Sorry I don't have my facts down, but it's bookmarked on my G5, which I am not using now.

  38. Why SmartPhone is crap by hirschma · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have one, won it in a contest, an Orange SPV-C500.

    They're going to have to make a whole lot of changes to make this dog hunt. Problems with the current SmartPhone:

    * Sync: you can sync with (just) one device. Don't ever try to unsync with that device, tho - in my case, you just can't. My notebook and phone are bonded forever.

    * Interface: One more time: the Windows Start button metaphor doesn't work on small devices. Other issues include that it can take several steps to get to common programs.

    * Non-intuitive/inconsistent UI: Sometimes, you can cancel out of something with the "red phone" button like on other phones. Sometimes you have to back out of things with the cursor button. Users of pretty much any other phone UI will go crazy.

    * Not invented here syndrome: MMS uses AMR encoding for audio. Smartphone (at least my version) just doesn't support it, period.

    * Crashes: It crashes a lot more than other phone OSes I've tried. Sometimes the crashes are partial - like losing networking ability.

    * LONG boot time: takes over a minute for my phone to come up.

    * Difficult to configure: the interface for configuring email and other internet apps is horrid and slow. Can't do it from a desktop app.

    * Web browser is just totally wonky: some things load. Some things don't. What loaded yesterday doesn't work today.

    * Slow: I believe that my device as a 200mhz processor in it, but screen updates and nav is really, really slow.

    * You get charged for everything: there is seemingly no community, but just software vendors. Folks that are spoiled by all the nice gadgety apps available on Palm and Symbian are going to be disappointed.

    Give me a Treo or Symbian device any day. I only use the thing because it was free, and I'm thinking seriously about ebaying it anyway.

    Microsoft has a lot of work here before they kill anything. I'm hating this thing so much that I'm about ready to go back to my "dumb" phone and PDA combo that I used before.

    jh

    1. Re:Why SmartPhone is crap by alex_ware · · Score: 1

      They also break an awful lot, I have one on contract and (it is insured) but it has had to be sent in several times to be replaced.

      --
      If you have nothing useful to say post as AC.
    2. Re:Why SmartPhone is crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the great review of Smartfon 2003....or have you somehow traveled into the future to have Smartfon 2005 (Magneto) installed on your Orange SPV-C500?

    3. Re:Why SmartPhone is crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So now the OS makes the hardware fragile?
      What on earth does Windows Mobile have to do with the quality of your hardware manufacturer?

    4. Re:Why SmartPhone is crap by alex_ware · · Score: 1

      I was talking about the SPV-C500 in specific.
      --

      --
      If you have nothing useful to say post as AC.
    5. Re:Why SmartPhone is crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ick, I can't stand pda/phones. The treo and it's ilk are too freaking big to be a phone, and too small to be an effective pda. I carry a phone and a PocketPC and have never had a lick of trouble with either. But every combined gadget I've ever tried just left a bad taste in my mouth. Aside from the fact that I have never gotten any palm device to sync properly out of the box on any platform or with any contact manager.

    6. Re:Why SmartPhone is crap by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Sync: you can sync with (just) one device. Don't ever try to unsync with that device, tho - in my case, you just can't. My notebook and phone are bonded forever.

      That's not true at all. I sync with two PC's and have done since the first Smartphone. On the second PC connecting, you are asked if you want to use both, or delete the existing. When you connect to a third PC, you are given the option to remove one of the existing ones. I use the sync feature a lot, as it effectively allows you to sync all your callendar, contacts and tasks between two PCs, my home and office one basically. Having one global contact list is great, worth doing for that reason alone.

      Agreed on boot time, right pain in the ass. Crashes I found rare, depends on a lot of things like the apps you install, or how good the bundled software the network provider puts on. Some are really bad in that respect.

      You can do all your changes thru a desktop app, check out the free (as in beer) Remote Display util from Microsoft. Yeah, entering server addresses and especially non-weak passwords on a phone keypad is really sucky.

      You get charged for everything: there is seemingly no community, but just software vendors.

      To a certain extent that is true. There are heaps of free apps available though that do just about anything you need, and some of the free games are really good as well. However, I have moaned publicly about the lack of community in the OS in terms of software development. Some of the user groups, such as this one do have a great and helpful community, it's just that the creators of the free apps don't embrace OSS at all. :-(

      Microsoft has a lot of work here before they kill anything. I'm hating this thing so much that I'm about ready to go back to my "dumb" phone and PDA combo that I used before.

      Don't give up just yet, it was free for you so you might as well give it a chance. Check out Modaco where you'll find all the apps, games and help you'll need. Perhaps you'll be turned to the dark side; I was, though nowadays I'm on the Windows Mobile PDA devices.

    7. Re:Why SmartPhone is crap by Zone-MR · · Score: 2, Informative

      However, I have moaned publicly about the lack of community in the OS in terms of software development. Some of the user groups, such as this one [modaco.com] do have a great and helpful community, it's just that the creators of the free apps don't embrace OSS at all. :-(

      Shameless plug: www.spv-developers.com

      Still small, but growing rapidly. We've worked on several interesting OSS projects, and have some revolutionary new stuff planned for the coming weeks :p

  39. Marvel Universe by robyannetta · · Score: 1

    I hope Marvel sues.

    --
    - Just my $0.02, take with a grain of salt, your mileage may vary.
    1. Re:Marvel Universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if they do I hope they don't win. Magneto is a word. Just like Tiger. Ofcoz M$ shouldn't be able to trademark the word either.

  40. Blackberry killer? by phyruxus · · Score: 0, Redundant

    what, they're going to install it on the Blackberry? That'll kill it all right...

    --
    "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
    "d'Oh!" ~Homer
    1. Re:Blackberry Killer? by praxis · · Score: 2, Informative

      From what you want:

      1. small as possible -- Got that, I have a Mpx200 which is 4 oz. and 1.90x3.5x1.06 in. Certainly a phone form factor first.
      2. best screen possible -- It's an old phone, so it's only 176x220 pixel display, but certainly works for my phone/PDA needs. Newer devices will have better displays I'm sure.
      3. blackberry/treo keyboard -- Nope, shortcoming here, but once again, it's an old device.
      4. push email -- EAS allows push email, calendar, etc.
      5. IM -- Has that too.

      Added things I like you didn't mention: over-the-air update, passthrough connection when connected via USB to a computer, use as a modem.

    2. Re:Blackberry Killer? by o-hayo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Hell, I think PalmOne's Treo could kill the blackberry if it offered REAL push email and instant messanger applications.

      There is a REAL push email option. The software you seek is Good. No, really. Check out GoodLink ( www.good.com ) and see how they are already one-upping blackberry by doing crazy wacky things like letting you CHOOSE from a bunch of different phones and setup a new managed phone without touching or cradling it, EVER. Palm and Windows Mobile devices are supported with talks of Symbian on the way. The UI is much nicer than BB phones (according to actual BB users) and aside from issues with the Treo 650 itself, the software has been problem free since day 1.

      Disc: Not from an employee, but a satisfied customer and guy who has to admin the stuff.

    3. Re:Blackberry Killer? by hamsterboy · · Score: 1

      I'm actually at the conference, and I can confirm some of this. WM5 integrates pretty smoothly with Outlook; aside from whiz-bang crap (take a picture with your phone, attach the picture to an Outlook contact, show the photo in all emails), it looks pretty good.

      Also, this isn't just for phones - it's the next generation of the PDA OS as well, so it supports many screen form factors, with or without keyboard, etc.

      Hamster

    4. Re:Blackberry Killer? by salesgeek · · Score: 1

      Hell, I think PalmOne's Treo could kill the blackberry if it offered REAL push email and instant messanger applications.

      Actually, once you use a blackberry, you really don't want to switch back. It is the Macintosh of the smartphone world.

      And it's users are just as... enthusiastic.

      --
      -- $G
  41. Why spend hundreds of dollars on a phone? by mcho · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Personally, I don't think an all-in-one phone is practical.

    Computers are overly complex as it, why make phones the same way? For example, a friend of mine asked me to help him export/import his contact list from Outlook. He couldn't figure it out even though this is a feature that's been around for a good, long time, but probably a majority of users don't know how to use it.

    That's why I've started messagingreminder.com so you can automatically recieve reminders on your appointments (which are stored in Microsoft Outlook or Mozilla Sunbird) -- you don't have to do anything but run the software!

    I rather have a $50 with a good battery life and reception than a +$300 phone that I can't figure out how to use and quickly drains its battery.

  42. Suddenly... by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

    They jerked the helmet off Magneto to reveal...


    Bob.
    "D00dz!" said Bob, but it was no use: Bob was crushed like the useless crapsack that he was.

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    1. Re:Suddenly... by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1
      Crapsack....

      I wish that God were still alive to see this!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    2. Re:Suddenly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Och, He's livin' right here, boss... :)

  43. It'll take Hardware by At0miC · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It will take new Hardware to 'kill' blackberry not the software running it. The blackberry is popular because it's compact and does it's job.
    If/When microsoft can pressure hardware makers into creating something that has form and fucntion, then all the bells and whistles of a new OS will help push them over the top. Until then, the blackberry will continue to own the business communications market...

  44. Not _another_ OS from Gates! by Baldrson · · Score: 0, Troll
    Hasn't Gates done enough damage with his shit software without creating yet another bad software foundation for the industry to adapt to? I mean his thing about waiting for the hardware to catch up with his "powerful software" is just the same old crap of trying to make things work better by making things more complicated.

    It reminds me of how NASA was always so proud of the fact that the Space Shuttle is "the most complicated machine ever built by mankind".

  45. Are the apps still going to be crippled versions? by argent · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The "Palm-Sized PC" and then Pocket PC apps were crippled version of the original Windows CE applications, with the ability to view multiple documents and navigate the file system removed in an apparent effort to make was might have been a viable laptop replacement into something that emulated the limitations of the Palm OS without managing to pick up any of the advantages that came along with them.

    That was when the Pocket PC was supposed to be a "Palm Killer". Well, it was cellphones that really tromped on the traditional Palm, and Microsoft almost completely failed to get a position in that market while I see the Handspring/Palm Treo all over the place.

    Now they're going for a "Blackberry Killer". I wonder what that portends for their applications. Will they finally let the Windows CE platform really compete with the ultralight laptops and Tablet PC on anything like a level playing field?

  46. Some more failed "Killer Products" from MS by Dark+Coder · · Score: 0, Troll

    These are the products that Microsoft PR engine machine once called a "killer product" and believe me, these MSFT PR "DID" uses these two words literally.

    Xenix
    DOS 3.1 (kills competing DR-DOS and IBM-DOS)
    OS/2
    Windows 98 (it should have been 95.1)
    IE (all versions)
    Clippy
    IIS (reminds me of SpongeBob SquarePants, porous, isn't he?)
    FrontPage
    Barney ActiMates
    Windows Millinieum Edition (ME)
    JVM
    C## .NET
    Longhorn??

    Not to mention the biggest revenue making...

    OEM Licensing Restrictions

    Or their vaporwares...

    Spyware Killer (yes, this one is STILL ineffectual)
    iPOD
    UNIX-replacement to Xenix
    Google

    Looking back in retrospective... it seems rather bland and porous to me nowaday.

    "One World, One Web, One Program." -- Advertisement for Internet Exploder
    "Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Fuehrer." -- Adolf Hitler

    44,513 publicized bugs since Windows 3.11. If this were an automobile manufacturer, they be sued out of existance.

    1. Re:Some more failed "Killer Products" from MS by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      You left out BOB and MSX.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  47. one device that will be running it by utexaspunk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    drool... say what you want about windows mobile, but i don't see any other devices with other operating systems that can do what windows mobile does. sure, there's plenty of room for improvement- it seems i have to reboot my ipaq 6315 every day or two, but no other device does as much as it can...

  48. Re:Pamela Jones EXPOSED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Actually, it's O'Gara who gets the "vanishing creme" .. fired, 86'd, "Take this byline and shove it".

    She's about as welcome now as a BSoD or spam; she's already proven to be less competent than the lowest politician; as ugly as vi or emacs, but without the redeeming features, and as empty of content as notepad when you hit "file->new"; more cracked than the mods on slashdot ...

    Nww, back on-topic - don't be surprised if she gets a job whoring/shilling/pimping this "latest and greatest" from her puppetmasters in Redmond.

  49. Nope! It's really... by jd · · Score: 1

    ...named after a psychotic mutant, hell-bent on wiping out humanity.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Nope! It's really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but he's a wonderful public speaker.

  50. Blackberry Killer? by CynicalGuy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    People dont use blackberries because of the OS. They use them because of the small form factor (new ones are even better) and the push email.

    Hell, I think PalmOne's Treo could kill the blackberry if it offered REAL push email and instant messanger applications.

    But knowing Microsoft, this thing is going to end up bundled with Windows Media Player, Internet Explorer, the entire Microsoft Office suite, and be just slightly too big for my pocket.

    I want: 1. small as possible 2. best screen possible 3. blackberry/treo keyboard 4. push email 5. IM

    That's it.

  51. Does anyone actually use Pocket Office? by FatRatBastard · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have used the Handcom Office software maybe twice on my Zaurus, neither time for anything actually work related. Working on Word and Excel documents is pretty difficult on a PDA form factor, I have to imagine its downright useless on a phone screen.

    Is anyone really doing last minute alterations to presentations on their phone?

    1. Re:Does anyone actually use Pocket Office? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recommend installing a dildo. Make it into a real pocket rocket.

    2. Re:Does anyone actually use Pocket Office? by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I use Pocket Excel to keep track of my bowling scores when I'm at the bowling alley. It's neat to be able to generate a bunch of statistics. But I have to agree and imagine not too much "real" work gets done in Pocket Office.

    3. Re:Does anyone actually use Pocket Office? by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 1

      It really depends on what you mean by "real" work.

      Word Mobile is not primarily designed to provide much support for editing -- as the GP said, trying to edit much of anything on a handheld device is not a compelling user experience. The primary use the team optimized for was high-fidelity viewing of documents along with occasional small deltas with minimal feature loss. WordMobile supports lossless editing during roundtrip (to the extent possible: it doesn't support revision marks). The product team focused on two things: getting the display story right for the main text, and writing .doc correctly.

      (And don't tell me about OO.o -- Writer can't even create a correctly formatted empty .doc file, at least not as of 1.9.100.)

    4. Re:Does anyone actually use Pocket Office? by BlurredWeasel · · Score: 1

      HA! Thats exactly what I use my PDA for! Its nice to have your average right there. The CSU bowling team went to a tournament, and I got everybody's scores, and at the end of the day just by highlighting cells could figure all the averages that would have taken me at least 20 minutes to type into a calculator.

    5. Re:Does anyone actually use Pocket Office? by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      i use pocket excel to keep track of my fill-ups and mileage in the car. it's handy for stuff like that, but i don't know if that constitutes real work

    6. Re:Does anyone actually use Pocket Office? by limabone · · Score: 1

      Pocket excel would be much more useful if it had macro support (yes there are alternatives but I haven't been satisfied with them either), and supported more columns. These new handhelds are pretty powerful, they should be able to cram more features into pocket excel now.

      They need a pocket ms access also. I have a Socket bar code scanner that I hook up to my Dell Axim for doing physical asset inventories/audits of our computer systems (each asset is barcoded)...and these mini versions of office are great.

  52. Interview by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interviewer: Are you Satan, Mr. Gates?

    Gates: <munch munch munch munch> Ah no, that will come with Windows XP SP5.

    Interviewer: Do you believe that MS has any place in the mobile world?

    Gates: <chew chew chew chew> Ah yes, I believe that we should stick it to mentally handicapped twenty-somethings at every opportunity.

    Interviewer: Are you a malignant cancer on the ass of humanity?

    Gates: <scrgggchmmlzzz ahhh....> No, no, but that is a patent we're pursuing.

    Interviewer: Why are you inserting that chip into my brain?

    Gates: <phhzzzzz plung pop> It's our latest mobile feature, the Longhorn visualizer, which will make you believe that Longhorn is actually a major leap in technology, rather than just a pack of vaporware.

    Interviewer: Yes my master...

  53. Only on slashdot... by Junta · · Score: 1

    Would tha be considered 'Informative'....

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  54. Blackberry Killer: one good heavy hammer by suitepotato · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Well given that I know not one person who I actually take seriously that uses a Blackberry, what's left?

    Microsoft cannot possibly give it a name that makes anyone want to buy it except the dumb, drunk, and half-asleep crowds. Microsoft Orgasmatron. Microsoft Raspberry. Fark, no, I can't think of anything. Something pharmaceutical like Microsoft Amitricin. No...

    Even numbers are no good after 2000, 2003, XP. Microsoft MCXVII. Microsoft 0111001001010. Microsoft AE21B19A. Bleah...

    Magneto is just too stupid. Either purposely or accidentally matching a villain from a comic well known to geeks. Referencing something from electromagnetic and electrical engineering? To what end? Okay, bad question with MS.

    No way I can see that there's any way to market it but use it in a media player and call it M-Pod. No, not even that.

    Okay, so if coolness isn't happening, then does it have anything that we can't already get by stripping down a Linux distro and fiddling with it?

    Apparently not.

    So the point of them even bothering with this is... what?

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
    1. Re:Blackberry Killer: one good heavy hammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft Half-Assed OS, with Media Player Disaster 11.0 and full support for Customer Gets Screwed API.

  55. Re:Marvel Universe cant sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FYI the name "magneto" is not a Marvel trademark except when associated with a comic-book character.

    A magneto, proper, is a part of an engine and cannot be a copyright-able name except when asociated with items that are NOT that part of an engine. Therefore, it is a trademark of MS with respect to their software program.

  56. Actually... by jd · · Score: 1

    ...if you watch the movie very carefully, you can see this new Microsoft product sneaking up behind blackberries and squishing them.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  57. This name... by netsphinx · · Score: 1

    Skipping over the comic book character for a moment--

    Isn't "magneto" the British-English term for what Americans call a "carburetor?"

    Comic book villain, or old car part...great marketing, either way.

    1. Re:This name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alternator, AFAIK

    2. Re:This name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Isn't "magneto" the British-English term for what Americans call a "carburetor?"

      No. Not even close.

      A magneto on an engine is a spark ignition mechanism that does not work the same way as a coil/distribtor mechanism.

  58. Re:Quick Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    while this is true, perhaps grandfather poster
    formats his posts in such a way as to conceal his
    true identity.

  59. So is are the writing off the Embedded space? by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This seems so weighted towards the Phone/PDA segment I have to wonder if Microsoft writing off the rest of the Embedded market to go after the PDA/Phone market?
    Of course Palm is going to build on top of Linux for there new version so It will be interesting to see what they do.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    1. Re:So is are the writing off the Embedded space? by Surur · · Score: 3, Insightful


      WM 5 is just the shell. The OS is the new Win Ce 5.1, on which you can run any shell. One of its main features is the integrated .Net compact framework. Also for higher power embedded devices there is always windows xp embedded.

      Surur

      --
      Information is the location of things. Computation is moving things around.
    2. Re:So is are the writing off the Embedded space? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What about for lower powered devices? Linux runs on the DragonBall and SH4.
      Frankly a lot of apps do not need a 400 mhz+ Xscale.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  60. But how big? by MosesJones · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The OS will integrate Smartphone, Pocket PC, and Pocket PC Phone Edition operating systems into one platform.

    That is quite a large functionality footprint, what is the target footprint for this thing? It would also be great if in the new version they could realise that a SmartPHONE is a PHONE first and a PDA second and stop with all the stupid bloody modal windows (volume is MODAL for godsake).

    Interesting, but in terms of marketshare its about as relevant as a new release of Mac OSX is to the desktop.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
  61. LINUX ON PDA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IS DEAD

  62. mutants by uberjoe · · Score: 1

    But without a way to test whether his skeleton is metallic by trying to rip it out of his body with my magneto, I have no way of knowing whether he is a mutant or not. They look just like everyone else you know.

    --

    The days of the digital watch are numbered.

  63. Four words by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Single point of failure." I for one don't want to be unable to make or receive calls just because my PDA gets a virus or otherwise decides to act up. Think it doesn't happen? It happenned to Chad Dickerson No, I think all-in-one is a very BAD idea.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Four words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my PDA gets a virus or otherwise decides to act up

      This is probably where developers should use Java, in spite of the attitude that it is more resource intensive. Sand boxes, no buffer overflows, etc., is even more critical when you're on an unknown network in some random part of the world.

  64. Personally... by Progman3K · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For me, it doesn't matter what product Microsoft develops anymore.

    I will always avoid all their products like the plague and use my influence to guide others to avoid them also.

    I know it sounds like trolling, but I'm not posting anonymously, and I AM serious, this is my opinion, and this is reality.

    I represent a segment of consumers who are completely fed up to the gills with Microsoft and are tired of constantly giving them another chance.

    This will again be just like all their other products; it'll be inferior, there'll be interoperability problems with everyone's else's products, and Microsoft will continue to promise that the next version will be perfect, which by now, we've all realized is bunk.

    Of course, if the product ever takes off at all, Microsoft will have realized their goal: to drive another competitor out of business. They'll then proceed to completely ignore the product and its users, just like they've done with Internet Explorer or Office. With no competition, there is no impetus to improve.

    So again, NO THANKS, Microsoft.

    There are alternatives, so support the other vendors, buy their products!

    Free speech AND free beer? YES, PLEASE!

    --
    I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    1. Re:Personally... by praxis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I pitty the poor folk that take advice about a product from someone who has formed an opinion about it by avoiding it. Granted, past history can certainly be a factor, but I personally like to make informed decisions. Sometimes I do the research myself, other times I turn to sources that do credible research on my behalf. I never take advice from an opinionated source which does not do credible research, and hope to urge others to also make informed decisions.

    2. Re:Personally... by Progman3K · · Score: 2, Informative

      >I never take advice from an opinionated source which does not do credible research, and hope to urge others to also make informed decisions.

      And well you should.

      I've used Windows since Windows/286 and I've written lots of software for Windows. I've also rolled-out lots of Microsoft products for various projects and work environments.

      I've made up my mind based on my own research and come to the conclusion that I have through logic.

      Sounds like you do the same. I can't argue that.

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    3. Re:Personally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for sharing.

      You are part of the .00001% of the population wh0 purchases technology based on politics instead of pesky things like features, support, compatability, usability, etc.

    4. Re:Personally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's also part of the population that resists helping a monopoly oppress the public and compteting companies and he s/he also prefers to support entrepreneurs developing their own products

      So you're right; s/he thinks for him/her self instead of being like the rest of the sheeple.

    5. Re:Personally... by praxis · · Score: 1

      I was responding to your statement:

      "For me, it doesn't matter what product Microsoft develops anymore. I will always avoid all their products like the plague and use my influence to guide others to avoid them also."

      If you've "come to the conclusion that [you] have through logic" it's exactly the logic I avoid in advice from people. To ignore a product or idea because of past products or ideas of an entity is just fine. Perhaps you don't feel that the time to research the new product or idea is worth your time because historically it hasn't been. It's your time, do with it as you please.

      Now, to go and use your influence to get other people to avoid that product is poor professional behavior, and I pity the people that follow such advice. You avoided the product, so to go an convince people to avoid it without real understanding is immoral in my book and I feel sorry for the people who get hooked by that.

    6. Re:Personally... by Progman3K · · Score: 1

      You're right that I DON'T feel evaluating their product is worth my time.

      No wait, that isn't quite true; there's ALWAYS time to evaluate it, but I've lost that urge to download the obligatory "this one is free, but the next one won't be" SDK that inevitably follows the first tangible release of one of Microsoft's new technologies (I use the terms 'new' and 'technology' loosely).

      I've learned that the deeper you put your hand in that particular meat-grinder, the more of your arm you'll lose.

      So yes, BY ALL MEANS, evaluate, but don't stop there: Lots of people say "Oh, Microsoft already does this (or rather 'will do this' vaporspeak)" and stop their evaluation at that point.

      I maker it a point to see through the hype and actively look for alternatives, especially open-source ones.

      And even in the cases where Microsoft's products claim to be superior, I'd rather choose a vendor that won't lock me in.

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    7. Re:Personally... by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      I wonder if he is willing to stand up against the other evil monopolies in the world, such as say electrical service and water.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    8. Re:Personally... by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      Say what you like but your experiences may not reflect that of the entire world. I've had much more pain supporting both the Palm devices and Blackberrys than I have had with PocketPC.
      God how I hate the Palm sync software.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    9. Re:Personally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The idea of developing for Windows doesn't thrill me, but I know that if I create a binary that runs on Win32, I'll have successfully supported 95% of the desktops in the world.

      There is no equivalent in the mobile space. We have the kind of app that could be extremely useful, has extremely modest storage/CPU requirements, and there's no one target we can hit and say "it runs on 95% of the market!"

      We have to undergo herculean efforts to port our app to as many different mobile devices as possible. This may be our only competitive advantage. It's ridiculous. We should not be putting up with this much bullshit in 2005. I will go as far as saying that the consumer is losing out because Microsoft, a company who "gets" developers, is having so much trouble whipping this market into shape.

      Instead of concentrating on making better apps, we're spending our development time (and our investor's money) Rewriting Everywhere(TM). I dream of the year when all of this is done and we can work on bringing better functionality to market.

      J2ME? PUH-LEASE!

      Not a single mobile device has run our app the same way as any other mobile device. It's so ridiculous. Even minor differences in models from a manufacturer behave radically differently.

      I welcome Microsoft's entrance into this market.

    10. Re:Personally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I eagerly anticipate the day when Linux hackers are fighting for a $20 refund from Samsung because they installed Linux on their phones and don't want to pay the Microsoft tax, because it means I can finally write once run anywhere.

      Argh!

    11. Re:Personally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I think the basic issue is that PocketPC, Palm, and Blackberry all suck. There's a reason cell phones are basically toys beyond just making phone calls, and there's a reason my PDA has addresses in it and a calculator program and nothing else of value.

    12. Re:Personally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll have successfully supported 95% of the desktops in the world.

      So you are actually claiming that your apps work on Win 95 through Longhorn Beta as-is? Yeah, right. Even Microsoft isn't that lucky with their own apps.

      There is no equivalent in the mobile space.

      J2ME is as close as it gets, and it's unlikely Microsoft could do better. There are just too many different mobile platforms with different constraints.

      I welcome Microsoft's entrance into this market.

      Bleh, Microsoft is a dead horse. Their business model is so antagonistic and back-stabbing, that anyone who hasn't realized this by now must be very very impressionable. You need to be careful what you wish for.

    13. Re:Personally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll have successfully supported 95% of the desktops in the world.

      So you are actually claiming that your apps work on Win 95 through Longhorn Beta as-is? Yeah, right. Even Microsoft isn't that lucky with their own apps.

      I could, but that's not really the point.

      There is no equivalent in the mobile space.

      J2ME is as close as it gets, and it's unlikely Microsoft could do better. There are just too many different mobile platforms with different constraints.

      J2ME sucks . OK? Lets overlook the fact that there isn't a single J2ME target with a majority marketshare.

      Lets also overlook the fact that almost all of these J2ME targets have conflicting bugs.

      Lets also overlook every manufacturer outright ignoring parts of the J2ME specification. In Samsung's particular case, a set of phones doesn't have hardware support for copying bitmap sub-rectangles around, so they just leave the feature out entirely instead of defaulting to a software implementation. Assholes

      Lets overlook that there isn't a single standard way of distributing apps that will work across every phone. Some phones just outright choke on particular assortments of WHITESPACE in the freaking JAD files.

      Lets also overlook the fact that the telco providers block network access inconsistently from region-to-region, let alone each telco doing something radically different than the other.

      Why don't we just pretend that some phones don't actually refuse to install JAR files that are larger than 100K.

      Even if all of these things weren't individually huge showstoppers for a lot of developers, J2ME is still unusable garbage. Why? Well, the thought of running running abstract-everything Java class libraries with a garbage collection based memory management, thread-based event models, and of all god damned things, bytecode interpretting instructions on CPUs as powerful as a 486 with 512K of RAM is absolutely batshit-crazy stupid!!!

      I'm absolutely convinced that Microsoft can do better. If Microsoft could acquire/duplicate Qualcomm's BREW and give it 95% marketshare, I would personally suck Bill Gates's cock every day for a month.

      It'd be even better if someone introduced a Linux environment, but lets be realistic here, vendors would have to do that voluntarily, just as they're introducing J2ME, and we can all see how well that's going.

      The old Microsoft would be prepared to put all of these jerks out of business to unify this platform. Does the "mature" Microsoft have the balls to make it happen?

      I, for one, am praying for it.

  65. Why magneto? by panurge · · Score: 4, Funny
    For the few who don't know, a magneto is a self-energising spark generator for spark-ignition internal combustion engines. It consists, basically, of a magnet (duh), a coil and a contact breaker. Either the coil or the magnet rotates, generating current which passes through the coil until the breaker opens when, in accordance with the laws of conservation of energy, the energy has to go somewhere and some of it ends up in the spark. (Yes, this is real electrotechnology 101.)

    The hand-cranked generators used on early telephones and, for rather longer, on field telephones was also called a magneto, and I guess this is why Microsoft has expropriated yet another common word for its products.

    So from this important piece of information we can work out the features of magneto the operating system:

    • It will be capable of doing only one thing at a time
    • It will generate a lot of stray EMI
    • The user interface will suck: it will need a lot of hand cranking and point setting to work properly
    • It will be replaced by something better just as soon as it becomes available.
    And yes, I still have bitter and twisted memories of the magnetos on my Vincent, my Velo...in fact, every British motorbike I ever owned. Not that I'm in any way prejudiced (I was stupid to buy the things)
    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    1. Re:Why magneto? by aduzik · · Score: 1

      Maybe it too will have a hand crank! That would be innovative :-)

      --
      If it's not one thing it's your mother.
    2. Re:Why magneto? by bd32322 · · Score: 1

      Actually magnetos are in universal use in aircraft internal combustion engines. Reason they are used is because they can provide a spark even in the case of a complete electrical failure.

  66. Re:Ah, I wish by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Heck, I would by a copy for that alone.

    "White shores...and beyond... the far green country under a swift sunrise."

    Um...your phone is ringing

    Shut up, let it ring (sigh)

    Sera

    --
    Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
  67. It's good MS is improving WinMob... by gearmonger · · Score: 1

    ...but it still won't replace my Treo 650. PalmOS and the UI Jeff Hawkins has crafted are just so much more intuitive and efficient, and UI efficiency is something that power users tend to appreciate.

  68. uh oh by ocularDeathRay · · Score: 1

    I wonder how long before marvel sues them for this.

    I can see the settlement now. The new addition to the ultimates will be "clippy" the mutant paperclip.

    --
    Obama is a twitter sock puppet
  69. Re:even better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    3 PowerPC CPUs at 3.2GHz

    No, those are just the latest Longhorn system requirements.

  70. Billy G, benefactor of humanity! by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    Best thing Gates ever did was to marry Melidna so she'd never program again![*]


    (Yes, I know, she was actually a product manager or some such, but it's funnier this way...)

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  71. WinNames by kurt555gs · · Score: 2, Funny

    I saw some one here had a sig line that says it all:

    " WinCE + WinME + WinNT = WinCEMENT "

    I think from today forward M$ is going to have trouble getting the computer world (excluding the M$Fanboys) excited about anything.

    That is over even if they are and will continue to be rich

    Cheers

    --
    * Carthago Delenda Est *
    1. Re:WinNames by Dirtside · · Score: 2, Funny
      I saw some one here had a sig line that says it all:

      " WinCE + WinME + WinNT = WinCEMENT "

      It was probably a reference to this (funny) old image:

      http://www.geocities.com/rcwoolley/

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  72. So in other words... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

    ... Microsoft is admitting that WinCE was an utter failure?!

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  73. OT: Re:This name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually a magneto is for use with small engines that do not have access to a battery for creating an ignition spark.

    A carburetor is to mix fuel and air before intake to a cylinder for compression and combustion.

    1. Re:OT: Re:This name... by netsphinx · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the correction, everyone...I found full details here:

      http://science.howstuffworks.com/question375.htm

  74. Oh boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another MS item Miguel Icarza will want to integrate into the Gnome Desktop/WM system.

    I can't wait. Mono meet Magneto.

  75. Problem is that Gates STILL doesn't get it. by crovira · · Score: 1, Insightful

    When he commoditized the PC market, he made his own support by creating the clones, and wiping IBM off the PC map.

    But now that that game is over, none of the mom and pop PC assemblers have two nickels to rub together.

    He's in a real bind because NOBODY can just break into the telecom market. Its too well regulated. The FCC can be bought to mandate AGAINST phones that have lousy characteristics just like the auto industry was mandated against selling cars that have jousy characteristics (Name "Corvair" ring a bell. That was car crashed for no reason too. And don't ghet me started on the steering columns...)

    All it takes is some persons who couldn't call 911 because their phones crashed and Microsoft will be up to its ears in litigation. Granted they are getting practice shutting up their own fansites but that is in civil court.

    This could send people to jail criminally.

    And don't count out civil court ability to do damage to Microsoft.

    Somebody who's unnecessarily crippled, after lying there holding a crippled phone, makes a convincing witness in front of a judge trying a case for damages based on potential future earnings and 'pain and suffering'.

    Besides, Microsoft doesn't make hardware (Some keyboards, mice and the XBox excepted.)

    Telecom is a hardware business. They may make their money from charging you every month but they can't charge you without seling you the hardware.

    Gates won't be able to leverage his closed standards because NONE of the telecom providers are going to just GIVE HIM CONTROL.

    They KNOW what Gates did to the PC hardware business.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:Problem is that Gates STILL doesn't get it. by SunFan · · Score: 1

      Gates won't be able to leverage his closed standards because NONE of the telecom providers are going to just GIVE HIM CONTROL.

      On top of that, I'd bet that Microsoft has zero presence in the telecom infrastructure. Sun and HP don't sell their NEBS/Mil-spec servers at a price premium because the telcos are shopping for Windows!

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
  76. Microsoft Reader? by AmicoToni · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Something that has been inexplicably missing for a long time from Microsoft's Smartphone software is Microsoft Reader.

    Now that all the versions of Windows Mobile have been unified, it is legitimate to expect Microsoft Reader to move to smartphones as well. It is a market Microsoft has surprisingly neglected to explore so far.

    Any reports about Reader and WM2005?

  77. Its NOT the OS... by hacker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Bill Gates and many other senior members of companies that produce operating systems delusionally believe that people somehow care about the OS that their computer or device runs.

    They don't.

    People care what their device DOES , not what their device is POWERED by.

    If these devices run OS/2, Amiga, DOS, whatever... does not matter. If it does what they want, talks to their other devices in a non-confusing way, and can read their data formats (PIM data, documents, media formats, etc.), the OS does not matter.

    In fact, with virtualization becoming more and more popular (and available), your hardware will be running multiple OS' at the same time and guess what... you won't care.

    The data is what matters. The function is what matters. The OS does not matter.

    The only reason we care about the OS right now, is because in most cases (i.e. Microsoft), the OS lacks that functionality, or the functionality it provides is horribly broken, so we fight with it, instead of work with it.

    1. Re:Its NOT the OS... by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      >People care what their device DOES , not what their device is POWERED by.

      Unless they need some specific applications only availible for that OS.

      Yes, I can see your point. People want to get things done, and don't really care how. But if something will help them do it better, they would chose it over the other option.

      The OS is a key part of the package which provides the users with what they want. If the OS doesn't matter, but functionality does, what provides that functionality? The OS, then the applications. If this weren't the case, everybody would still be using the first version of DOS or something. The applications need the features of the OS to provide their own functionality, and in the case with Smartphones the OS has to be packed with all the features or separate apps. Unless your suggestion is to only provide the users with a kernel and let them compile their own dialers, message composers and PIM apps.

      Back in the day the phones had their own OSs, and most people had no idea what they were. No MS comes in, and says that their OS provides better functionality. People care, because it potentially does more, better.

      Sorry I didn't spellcheck.

  78. It's in the Network Architecture + Battery Life by duffer_01 · · Score: 1

    The key reason why RIM has been so successful is because of their network architecture. RIM has the capability to trickle emails down to a device. Since the device is always connected to the network they have the ability to constantly receive these messages. The way the PocketPC devices are built they are not meant to be always connected to a network and if you did you would likely only get about 4-6 hours battery life. When you compare that to > one week for a RIM device there is no comparison.

    I do like that Microsoft is making an alternative to the BlackBerry, I do not think that they will be much competition for RIM unless they build a network architecture like RIM's and they look into the battery life issues.

    1. Re:It's in the Network Architecture + Battery Life by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 1

      "The way the PocketPC devices are built they are not meant to be always connected to a network and if you did you would likely only get about 4-6 hours battery life. When you compare that to > one week for a RIM device there is no comparison."

      Damn -- if I could get 4-6 hours of battery life from a PPC connected to WLAN then that would be a miracle. I have taken various Pocket PC devices (we test lot's of them at work) with me to the park while I let the kids play (and I will surf the net or stream shoutcast)-- And I have yet to have a PPC battery last longer than my kids energy to go down slides or climb rock walls. (Usually after 2 hours or less of use with a steady network connection the battery has had all that it can take.....and this is with commercial PDA's with the extended batteries. Your average Dell Axim or Ipaq is lucky to make it on to the network and through the box scores without draining itself down to 25%.)

      --
      (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  79. A Blackberry Killer?!? Thank God! by BigWhiteGuy_27 · · Score: 0

    I'd gladly pay M$ for a copy of this so that I'm no longer burdened with having to be at the beck and call of my boss!

  80. Named after... by halcyon1234 · · Score: 3, Funny
    An OS... from Microsoft... named after a character... who is an evil super villian bent on taking over the world.

    Good job.

  81. Magneto? by xtremee · · Score: 1

    Why did they call it that way? Because it's a magnet for viruses and spyware? (Insert bad joke music )

  82. Can I run my favorite Linux Apps? by PenguinBoyDave · · Score: 1

    Word, Excel, etc...that's all well and good. But can I run my favorite software from the FSF on this new OS? Me thinkist not.

    --
    I'm not a troll, but I play one on Slashdot.
    1. Re:Can I run my favorite Linux Apps? by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 1

      " Word, Excel, etc...that's all well and good. But can I run my favorite software from the FSF on this new OS? Me thinkist not."

      Many companies have tried PDA's that could run your favorite FSF on.....For some reason the 20 people that purchased them was not enough to keep the hardware companies in business. (Or at least in business in the US. IE - Sharp, or the countless other PDA's using linux in the PDA boneyard)

      --
      (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  83. Details as in.... by Mr.+BS · · Score: 1

    more memory... better security... what a load of crap. You wanna give me details there Biily Boy? How about some Kernel source?

    Details my ass... flamebait!

  84. Y'know... by Akardam · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Take the example of two people:

    The first person sticks his hand in boiling water, gets burned, and from there on out avoids sticking his hand in boiling water.

    The second person sticks his hand in boiling water, gets burned, waits a while, then sticks his hand right back in the boiling water just to see if its still hot.

    History generally considers the first person to be the wiser. No pun intended, but you can only get burned so many times before it just isn't worth it any more.

    1. Re:Y'know... by praxis · · Score: 1

      You illustrated my point well. I actually do not think it's wise to assume that all new releases from a company, say Microsoft, can be disregarded as identical in effect as those in the past. With water, it makes sense to learn from the past. It does not makes sense to write off Longhorn as something not worth even looking at because Windows 95 crashed a lot. It's hard to give a professional opinion, let alone make an informed descision if you "learn" from a situation that's not the same as the current one.

      So yes, the first person in your example is wiser. The OP here is not wiser, he learned from false premises.

    2. Re:Y'know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of this really matters that much, anyway. The future is again in open systems, from which Microsoft has isolated themselves. Linux, OpenSolaris, and Mac OS X are going to be the next big thing on the desktop, all three are largely interoperable out of the box, and all three cover the cost and quality spectra nicely. Microsoft simply hasn't allowed themselves a place in the future software economy, and, in ten years, Microsoft will likely be an XBox game supplier and that's about it.

    3. Re:Y'know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The future is again in open systems, from which Microsoft has isolated themselves.

      Relatively speaking, Microsoft is where it is today because they've favored open systems.

      Anyone can write a Windows application. Visual Studio is suprisingly cheap compared to commercial SDKs, and there's no shortage of student/poor people discounts if you don't just pick up lcc-win32 or gcc-win32.

      You don't need to subscribe to Microsoft's developer network, you don't have to pay them to distribute the applications, and they have absolutely no say in who runs what.

      Build one binary and you have potentially hundreds of millions of customers, and if you played your cards right, Microsoft didn't get a cent of it from you.

      Oh, yeah, well, people had to pay for the platform, possibly $20 in OEM licenses, but that's a relatively small price to pay to be able to join the hundreds of millions who can run lots of useful software.

      *shrug*

  85. Gripe with Magneto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, the master of magnetism. However, to get around some obvious limitations, they have magneto able to move non-magnetic materials "because of the nuclear magnetic moment" in all materials.

    Oh, come on!

    If he could do that, the magnetic strength would be enough to rip atoms apart!

    Just leave him with the ability to manage magnetic materials and he's fine.

    Silly over-powering. Just like a lot of Star Wars books re: Luke's power.

  86. What exactly is a Blackberry Killer? by cpeterso · · Score: 1


    I don't understand why the Blackberry is so popular. It's expensive. Its software is closed and ugly. Its hardware is ugly and cheap. It requires an expensive, proprietary server to connect to your enterprise's Exchange server. The Blackberry's only apparent advantage is that it has "push" email notifications, but that can be added to another device sooooo easily using background SMS.

    I think the Blackberry's success has been driven by their focus on The Enterprise. Once they get their proprietary server in your company's data center, new users will start adopting the Blackberry and you aren't likely to dump it.

    1. Re:What exactly is a Blackberry Killer? by BewireNomali · · Score: 3, Interesting

      i agree with you on most points.

      however, having used a blackberry, a treo, and a pocket pc device, i honestly have to say that the blackberry's design and form factor are geared more specifically towards effective mobile communication than the other two devices. for calls, both outgoing and incoming, most blackberries are a one-hand device. scroll wheel to a contact number, one click and i'm on a call. one click and I'm taking an incoming call. I can parse contact data from text messages and emails directly into my contacts, again with one handed operation... no stylus... no menus. Its practicality as a communications device more than makes up for its ugly form factor. As an end user, I'm no so much concerned that hardware and software protocols are closed. I care that it works and it's pretty f*cking useful. Well, I do care that exporting data from contacts is a f*ckin bitch, but it's my only major gripe. It works so well that I don't really care that it doesn't look so good. It's like that chick that isn't so hot but is a really good no-strings lay.

      I know I'm gonna get flamed by all the treo fanboys, but I don't get the hype about this POS. I had a palm tungsten C and that's a great f*ckin piece of work... but the treo is a joke. It weighs a ton and is unwieldy. It requires the use of a stylus which means two handed operation which all but obviates the usefulness of a communications device because it precludes multitasking. It's slow, and unlike other palm devices, not cleanly organized and functional. It's like the suicidal really hot chick with an eating disorder who, if you catch her in between well-measured medication doses, might be a really good lay. You're willing to be around her cause she's really hot, but ultimately, it just isn't worth your time.

      pocket PC devices have the most upside to me because they allow for the evolution of handheld devices. in that sense i think pocket pc devices will scale well. But that's the downside. having used many iterations of pocket pcs, you're so locked in by your hardware platform. The exact same build of pocket pc on one handheld could be brilliant on the one hand and excruciating on the other. hardware configurations are the monkey here. If you're not gettig top of the line hardware, you're f*cked. But pocket PC is definitely the dog's bollocks... and they're getting better about one handed use (again, depends on your hardware). this is like the really hot chick that you can only hook up with if you have all the bells and whistles that really hot chicks dig ($) - and she's a great f*cking lay.

      That said... blackberries serve their purpose well, but they will be killed off because I can't see how they can scale their hardware and software. As consumers begin to demand more and more from their handhelds, blackberries will need top-down redesigns to compete. If they're not in the pipeline with that already, I'd say that thy're f*cked.

      --
      un burrito me trampeó.
    2. Re:What exactly is a Blackberry Killer? by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      I've never actually used a Blackberry, but I've watch people use theirs on the commuter train. Having programmed Windows CE apps, I know more about the wide range of Pocket PC hardware quality than I would like. :)

      Given that, however, I plan to buy a Treo 650 soon. I agree with most of your points on the Treo vs the Tungsten C, but I want a phone and don't care about Wi-Fi. I don't want to carry both a phone and a PDA. Sure, Wi-Fi sounds cool, but I would give it up for a smaller/lighter/cheaper phone. Of course, the Tungsten C has a faster processor and twice as much memory..

  87. Don't forget the hardware! by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 2, Insightful

    MS is rumoured to have a new AllInOne phone coming out to work with this OS. The electronics are near production at Lucas in the UK...

  88. no MS SOFTWARE was ever a "competition" killer by Locutus · · Score: 1

    Obviously the press has never caught on to this and just keep quoting some polished MSFT press release docs to collect their payment for the articles.

    Regardless, it's always the acts of the company( Microsoft ) preventing actual competition/choice that's done any harm to the competitor.

    And another thing, Microsoft has lost about $1 Billion / year on their mobile Windows OS( WinCE ) since it went on the market some 8+ years ago. How could anybody in their right mind even think that this is just going to magically change because Microsoft says it is?

    BFD is what I say.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  89. Will Microsoft just 0wn/replace BREW already?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm so sick of it only working on Verizon's network, and J2ME sucks so bad.

  90. Interoperability by SleeknStealthy · · Score: 1

    I am not opposed to Microsoft technologies, and if "Magneto" is indeed a superior mobile product I would contemplate owning a smart phone that used the OS. However, I know that the functions of the phone will most likely be rather useless to me because Microsoft fails to recognize that not everyone is using Windows.

    This is where Microsoft must begin to support Linux if they want other product lines to be able to succeed. I think their is a misconception that everyone who uses Linux would never use any Microsoft product, but I believe that the situation is quite contrary and that many Linux users simply want the best technology and operating system wise Linux can be the superior technology and most facets, especially to geeks.

    --
    Math
  91. Never ever ever ever again...ever... by HalfOfOne · · Score: 1

    I made the mistake of buying an iPaq (2215) with PocketPC 2003 on it. In the last two years, there have been ZERO improvements to IE, zero MS patches or updates to the UI, and absolutely no additons to Windows Mobile Media Player 9 for it. That really cool landscape feature that's coming out....won't work with my version and there is no planned ROM upgrade.

    This is as much of a problem with Compaq/HP as with MS, to hear the MS guys tell the story. This *still* absolutely sucks. I don't care whose fault it is, I just want updates like I see for 2000 or XP; which isn't much but it is something. I expect it for the price I payed.

    It's a neat GPS/MP3 Player/Digital Picture viewer, but the lack of updates just pisses me off.

    Never ever again. Don't care what it'll do because I know they'll just let me down as far as continuing support.

  92. Moderator idiot alert. by zymano · · Score: 0

    It was wrong to mod down the topic !

  93. Amen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We just got a lot of blackberries here. Brand new dual CPU 1U Dell server and all... Seemed nice (and expensive), I had pretty high expectations.

    Turns out we got reception problems, and the sync'ing sucks - it just doesn't happen. Now the people that struggled to empty their inboxes daily still have to empty it, and empty their blackberry's inbox, too. You delete mail from either and sync, and the deleted mail is still on the other... And it's no good for opening any attachments (not surprising, but a lot of the users were expecting more features). The tech support is truly laughable as well. There is 1 semi-knowledgeable person at the telco for the whole region, and every time we call, we get a different (usually wrong) answer. And the keypads suck, especially if you got big fingers. It's so bad it's making me wish for a stylus so I can scribble stuff instead.

    Overall? It's more burden, more stuff for the helpdesk to support (and to be trained into), another server to look after, more expenses, more frustrations for everybody, ... I wish I had never seen one.

  94. Re:Carmack doesn't like it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Carmack is too used to developing on PCs with C and assembler to have an objective viewpoint on Java.

  95. SOD! (not the grass!) by Primal_theory · · Score: 0

    So does this one feather both SODs? I cant wait to get the BSOD wherever i go, but then, wait, theres more!, you can even get the RSOD wherever you go now!

    --
    Your skill in reading has increased by one point!
  96. Why is it... by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    ...that every time Microsoft introduces a "new" version of their Windows platform for another hardware platform, that it MUST come with some version of Word and Excel? I mean think about it... This version of Windows is supposed to unify multiple mobile devices, including things like phones. I don't know about you, but I long for the day when a phone is JUST a phone. I don't want to go typing up Word documents on it for crying out loud!!! That's just plain stupid! If I want to do text entry, just allow me to use something useful like Dasher and combine it with plain text notepad. It's not like I can't take that text and cut and paste it into Word when I get back to my desk. (Or more likely, Writer from the wonderful OpenOffice.org suite) Microsoft has been beating this concept of Windows everywhere to death. And in many cases Windows is just not a good fit. At least not until those knuckledraggers realise that they need a better interface than stylus or pen...

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  97. One platform?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The OS will integrate Smartphone, Pocket PC, and Pocket PC Phone Edition operating systems into one platform"

    And here I've been writing code for the past year or so as if they already were one platform? Did I miss something?