Slashdot Mirror


Blackberry Future Uncertain

Dave White writes "Research In Motion and NTP have failed to reach a settlement in the Blackberry case. It looks like the door has been opened for NTP to be granted an injunction blocking the sales of Blackberry wireless messaging devices in the US. The New York Times (free registration yadda yadda) has the scoop on this interesting development."

218 comments

  1. Maybe my carpal tunnel will de-syndrom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, if I couldn't replace my Crackberry, I'd be dead in the water. But I'd need less aspirin.

  2. Bug Me Not by VxJasonxV · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Bug Me Not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Who needs logins now?

      What about Slashdot?

    2. Re:Bug Me Not by FaceHead · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is slightly faster Reg free link

      (Thanks to New York Times Link Generator)

      --
      Paste!
    3. Re:Bug Me Not by romerom · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      did you actually waste the time to make that ? while funny, thats gotta be about the lamest thing i've seen

      --
      http://www.awwsheezy.com
  3. Text from a diff source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    RIM and NTP Reach An Impasse

    Research In Motion said it has reached an impasse with NTP Inc. in finalizing a patent dispute settlement and would take court action.

    The two sides had reached a settlement in March with RIM agreeing to pay $450 million to NTP to settle the patent litigation. In return, RIM was granted an unfettered right to continue its BlackBerry-related business without further interference from NTP or its patents. "We are extremely disappointed and I am personally extremely disappointed that this matter which we believed was resolved has been reopened by NTP," Jim Balsillie, RIM chairman and chief executive, said in a conference call.

    He also emphasized the terms agreed to in March "were clear and unambiguous. "For nearly three months now, RIM has been working in good faith to complete the process and obtain the final license and settlement documents," Balsillie said. According to RIM, NTP refuses to honor its obligations under the term sheet and finalize the definitive documents. Calls to NTP went unanswered. RIM said while it is unsure of the outcome of the court's decision, it is reviewing any potential accounting implications and has already set aside and will continue holding on to the funds to make the settlement payment.

    1. Re:Text from a diff source by l810c · · Score: 1
      I couldn't find a NTP website, but the article said they were a small company.

      Why don't the just take the damn $450 million and run? Are they holding out for $500M? $1 Billion? Are they actually going to make RIM take their product out of US market? That would seem to hurt them as well.

  4. Thank you God by Bonzor · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Blackberries are utter crap to begin with. My company gave them to all of our sales reps and the phones have been nothing but trouble. Just a note to anyone who gets a Blackberry device, stay away from Cingular. We have had about 5-6 of our reps switch to Verizon because Cingular sucks at life.

    1. Re:Thank you God by 1evilmonkey · · Score: 1

      Why did you switch from Cingular to Verizon?

      --
      crap
    2. Re:Thank you God by Bonzor · · Score: 0

      We switched because Cingular could not properly provide coverage for those people. Either their phones would not work at all or they would work half of the time. We've only been using the Cingular network for a few months and have already had three instances where an ENTIRE state had its data network go down for more than a day. That is totally unacceptable. On a side note, we have a lot of problems with Blackberries needing to be reset by taking the battery out. This happens quite often. Also, a lot of people are complaining you can't hear anything on the phones. First hand, I have found this to be true.

  5. blackeberry by bringmewater · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ouch, that's gonna leave a mark !

  6. BugMeNot by brickballs · · Score: 2, Informative

    bugmenot.com login info:
    onzinad
    ONZINAD

    --
    "What does slashdotting mean?"
    "You've never heard of slashdot?"
    "I know it makes websites not work."
  7. This is actually a Good Thing(tm) by shatfield · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We need a hundred of these types of losses -- where patents directly affect the public. Let the public get comfortable using a very necessary and nice technology, and then let some crappy company come out of nowhere and extort their way into an injunction and removal of the widget from the marketplace. The company (RIM in this case) should then perform a recall on all devices that infringe on that patent - notifying the users of their equipment exactly WHY they are being forced to give up their Blackberries.

    Then we'll see how long it takes to reform the patent system!

    --
    "To make a mistake is only human; to persist in a mistake is idiotic." Cicero
    1. Re:This is actually a Good Thing(tm) by finkployd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Forget this public, the opinions of those peons matter very little. This has the potential to affect CONGRESS! All those senators and representatives have Blackberries, and perhaps something that affects them personally will get them to realize there might be a problem with the patent system.

      And there is no way a forced recall would ever happen or work, but preventing future sales will still cause an uproar I would think.

    2. Re:This is actually a Good Thing(tm) by saitoh · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly." -- Abraham Lincoln

      always wondered how well that would work...

      --
      We don't need an "overrated" so much as we need a "you completely missed the parent's point, dumbass..."
    3. Re:This is actually a Good Thing(tm) by frozen_kangaroo · · Score: 1
      I don't think that it would be in anybody's interest to block the sales of the devices: NTP could put RIM out of business, yes, but then they would loose out too! They may just want to screw RIM out of as much money as they can ... and maybe try to take control of pricing policy or somesuch. This is all probably just part of an ongoing negotiation process. At the end of the day I do not think that it will affect availability of the devices, and the price the public pay for it is the price that they are prepared to pay ( based on other stuff that is available)

      So I think that the public might not be deprived of their Blackberries, and one more set of lawyers get piles of money for doing nothing other than exploiting a clearly corrupt patent system.

      Does anyone know what the actual patent is ? I'll bet it is something weak like "sending an e-mail from a portable device" or some such rubbish that anyone could have thought up ( but not actually implemented.)

    4. Re:This is actually a Good Thing(tm) by shashark · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, Laws repeal you.

    5. Re:This is actually a Good Thing(tm) by VitaminB52 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      All those senators and representatives have Blackberries, and perhaps something that affects them personally will get them to realize there might be a problem with the patent system.

      To bad your statement assumes those politicians are capable of logical thinking.

      Cause: bad patent system.
      Effect: RIM has to recall BlackBerries.

      Do you really think Congress(wo)men will be able to tell the difference between cause and effect? They will get pissed of with RIM, and continue their daily habits without changing the patent system.

    6. Re:This is actually a Good Thing(tm) by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      While I won't agree/disagree with the patent case (if they have the right to sue then fine, if they don't well damn)...it should note that depending on the request of the injunction (and the judge's approval) they could force a shutdown of existing services. What this means for the users:

      You can return your crackberry and get a full refund (including enterprise server licenses cost) or you can keep your crackberry and it just looks pretty, not doing anything that requires the service.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    7. Re:This is actually a Good Thing(tm) by Jacob+Martin · · Score: 1

      NTP RIMjobs US Congress!

    8. Re:This is actually a Good Thing(tm) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm actually a Soviet patent law, you insensitive clod!

    9. Re:This is actually a Good Thing(tm) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      No time for a quick google to find the patent number? No time to do a search on the U.S govt. Patent office site? Here's the patent.

      No time to follow the link? Here's the text of the abstract:

      A system and method for pushing information from a host system to a mobile data communication device upon sensing a triggering event is disclosed. A redirector program operating at the host system enables a user to continuously redirect certain user-selected data items from the host system to the user's mobile data communication device upon detecting that one or more user-defined triggering events has occurred. The redirector program operates in connection with event generating applications and repackaging systems at the host system to configure and detect a particular user-defined event, and then to repackage the user-selected data items in an electronic wrapper prior to pushing the data items to the mobile device. The mobile device and the host system share a common electronic address so that messages generated at either the host system or the mobile data communication device are configured using the common electronic address.

    10. Re:This is actually a Good Thing(tm) by Mignon · · Score: 2, Funny
      This has the potential to affect CONGRESS! All those senators and representatives have Blackberries

      No problem. I'm sure they'll still be legal to buy in Cuba.

    11. Re:This is actually a Good Thing(tm) by flibbidyfloo · · Score: 2, Informative

      FYI- From a 2003 story on www.brighthand.com:

      The chief lawyer for NTP responded (to Congress's concerns) by saying that, if he and RIM's lawyers couldn't come to a settlement on licensing fees, he won't ask the court to shut down RIM's service until a replacement is ready.

  8. good by tomstdenis · · Score: 0, Troll

    From what I heard it has a short battery life [10hrs], I know it costs alot and the service providers rape you 7 ways from sunday.

    It's not a good product for several reasons [not all of which are technical] and I for one would be glad to get rid of them.

    They're a bunch of smartass punks anyways. I went through the job interview process with them in Waterloo and they'd sit you down todo puzzles. Finally I turned around "do you know how to build a cryptosystem or multiply large numbers quickly?" The guy said no and I said "figures."

    Backstory: They were hiring me for my crypto-math knowledge not to see if I could quickly write programs to solve geometric puzzles [which while fun is a bit nerve shaking during an interview].

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    1. Re:good by WinDOOR · · Score: 3, Informative

      Mine lasts for days on a charge. My service provider charges $30 a month for unlimited data. How is that raped?

    2. Re:good by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Last I checked Rogers [provider in my area] was around 60-70$/month and even then there were limits..

      It depends I guess on where you are. I guess it was ok for people with unlimited business accounts, but for personal use it was useless.

      As for battery life I guess I was mistaken [I seem to remember hearing stories about it but that was a while ago].

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    3. Re:good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're a bunch of smartass punks anyways. I went through the job interview process with them in Waterloo and they'd sit you down todo puzzles. Finally I turned around "do you know how to build a cryptosystem or multiply large numbers quickly?" The guy said no and I said "figures."

      LOL. I would say you're disgruntled etc. but you had the honestyu & decency to disclose any reasons for your bias. I agree with you that they shouldn't have asked that question for the type of job.

      ANyway ... I wonder what the heck their patent covers .. I dont really see much innovation in a blackberry device .. My cell phone can do most of it (send email .. receive email .. etc) .. Why aren't cell phone companies the target? Or are they next?

    4. Re:good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow someone is pissy about not getting a job. Did it ever cross your obviously superior mind that maybe you were not good for the job or.... gasp too cocky ;) by the way how is McDonalds treating you ?

    5. Re:good by Quasar1999 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well Tom, in the real world, you need to have the ability to work under pressure. You need to be a well rounded person that can admit that you don't know everything.

      That's what the RIM interview is meant to test, along with technical knowledge, they want to know if you are actually capable of working in the real world. You could be a genius in your specific area, but if you don't listen to your supervisor simply because he's not as specialised as you are, then you would be a useless employee.

      I used to work at RIM (back when they only owned 2 buildings). They are not a bunch of smartass punks, they're a bunch of intelligent people looking to hire other people who are intelligent and not smartasses such as yourself (I'm basing this on your own admission to your behaviour in the interview, if you say that to the interviewer, what will you say to your boss?). A few words of advice, if you think you're all that, and RIM's interview process upset you, I wouldn't recommend applying to Microsoft or Google, or any big tech company... they make everyone do puzzles... and not every interviewer is as specialised as you are, that's why they're looking for someone with those skills. But I guess that would have required some sort of thought process outside of crypto-math to figure out... my bad...

      --

      ---
      Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    6. Re:good by tomstdenis · · Score: 0, Troll

      I wasn't pissed that I didn't get the job [for one reason other than they're snobs is that they're a windows shop].

      I was pissed about how superior they felt they were. These are the types that spend little time in society and don't understand that just because you can't do their specialized problem like they can doesn't make you inferior.

      I mean there are lots of people who can't write efficient portable bignum math during the course of an interview... I don't think less of them for that.

      Also, I do have a job and it's not at McDonalds. You're welcome to come to the office if you want. Just email me in private and you can see me at work.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    7. Re:good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your Blackberry review is obviously tainted by the job interview you had.
      If some kid asked me that question in a job interview and then said "it figures", I'd kick his ass right out the door.
      Sounds like you are the "smart ass punk".

    8. Re:good by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The thing is, they have to give you a bunch of extra tests during the interview. They are just trying to find the best person for a job. Granted, I find many employers take a little far, but they are just looking out for their own interestes. I'm sure most companies have ran into a problem of hiring completely the wrong person after a not thorough enough interview process. They put you through a series of tests, in order to see not only if you can do the job, but also handle the pressure. This is important when you are working on a project that may have strict deadlines. The other, and probably most important thing they are looking for, is how well they will get along with you when working with you. They want to make sure you don't have a bad temper, and will be in a good mood on most days. The only thing worse than working with someone who has no idea what they are doing, is working with someone who's always pissed off, Or for that matter, someone whos personality just conflicts with the rest of the team, no matter the reason.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    9. Re:good by acoustix · · Score: 1

      I constantly get 3 days of battery life on my BB 7750. I don't know where your 10 hours of battery life is coming from.

      -Nick

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    10. Re:good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Gee, did you ever think they were testing something other than your intelligence or ability to sovle puzzles?

      Maybe your discipline, how you approach problems, how you react under stress (it could be that one or more puzzles had no answer), your adaptablity? Maybe whether you had an attitude?

      And the longer I work, the more I believe that my manager doesn't need to have my technical skills, he or she should have management skills. I wouldn't expect the person hiring you to have those crypto-skills.

    11. Re:good by shic · · Score: 2

      Well Tom, in the real world, you need to have the ability to work under pressure. You need to be a well rounded person that can admit that you don't know everything.

      I consider myself "in the real world" - but I dismiss the idea that I don't know everything. Don't be fooled. I am omniscient - even if recall and other trivia are sometimes problematic.

    12. Re:good by Acid-Duck · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's because the point of getting you to do puzzle is to see how well you handle wierd situations and/or a changing environment. Also shows how creative you are I guess, and how good of a team player you are (you'll be up for any challenges, regardless how ridiculous it is?) Some people would of probably acted very puzzled (no pun intended) towards being asked to assmble one, which would of not been the reaction the interviewer was looking for.

      PS: Battery life is more like 5 days (although the site says 8) of standby, and 3hrs of talktime

    13. Re:good by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking that they may not even care how you did on the tests. All they wanted to see is how you handled pressure, and how nice it would be to work with you when you are under pressure. If you flip out, and make comments such as you did about some little test in an interview, imagine how you are going to react when there are real problems to solve, that have real pressure, because they could affect the entire company, and just your little interview.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    14. Re:good by Bonzor · · Score: 0

      Typically, if you use the Blackberry, it doesn't last very long. I'm sure that's where the 10 hours comes from. I know from experience the batteries don't last very long when used...which is common sense.

    15. Re:good by mobiGeek · · Score: 1
      I guess it was ok for people with unlimited business accounts, but for personal use it was useless.
      These are not meant to be personal devices. These are business devices. The fact that ISPs offer them as consumer devices and that people buy them for personal consumption is outside of the original intent.

      Take a look at the Blackberry platform. The Blackberry Enterprise Server (BES) is a middleware server designed for the deployment and administration of applications. This is not for Uncle Has-Every-Toy.

      There is no money in consumer devices unless done on a Very Large Volume and are tied to usage or rental fees. Business is where the bucks are at.

      --

      ...Beware the IDEs of Microsoft...

    16. Re:good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RIM had it coming. Their products are good for only one thing - and terribly overpriced at that! The BOM cost is about 70$ and the hardware is shite - no SD slot, tiny screens, poor telephone operation, closed operating system, no touchscreen, no voice command or recognition! The software is hideous and the user interface atrocious! This POS cannot be called a PDA! Cmon guys - patent the tiny keyboard!?? Gimme a break! How about a mail system that pushes instead of pulls? Big deal! That's nothing new. Should that be patentable?
      People aren't prepared to shell out $500-600 for a toy that does only one thing. It would cost nothing for RIM to add an SD slot, MP3 functions or decent PDA apps, but they've declared they never will! They insist that they cater only to business and not consumer demands - and that's why they will fail. Arrogant assholes...

      What about the huge fees RIM charges cell carriers to run he mail routing system "service" for them? How long do you think they'll put up with 15% of your monthly cellphone bill being absconded by RIM? RIM is nothing without these carriers.

      RIM has been riding on it's laurels for a long time - it's time someone took them down a notch! Good and others will eat their lunch. They may have been there early on, but they won't finish first. RIM employees? haha - most are effeminate little geeks - we call them RIM-boys here, and not everybody in Waterloo wants a McRIM job. 3000+ people in the the Waterloo offices alone just for R&D and mfg? That's quite top heavy despite their billion dollar savings account. Most people I know there hate their jobs and hate the place - salaries are ho-hum. Little cogs in a big machine...the BIG NERD FARM ..and no, I didn't apply there. I never will.

    17. Re:good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just another bitter Waterloo co-op student. You applied for the job, they didnt want you because you couldnt show your stuff in the interview. Get over it and dont slander the company when an article about them comes up. They make very solid products...

    18. Re:good by sjwaste · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking that they may not even care how you did on the tests. All they wanted to see is how you handled pressure, and how nice it would be to work with you when you are under pressure. If you flip out, and make comments such as you did about some little test in an interview, imagine how you are going to react when there are real problems to solve, that have real pressure, because they could affect the entire company, and just your little interview.

      "Hire the attitude, train the skill."

      This is exactly what they were trying to find out about you, and you failed miserably. Soft skills count, even for engineers, developers, etc. (I am one, and I got my job based primarily on my attitude, secondarily on my technical skills). Remember, someone else can walk in and learn your skills. They'd rather have someone they'd like to work with above all.

    19. Re:good by kyojin+the+clown · · Score: 1
      Here in the UK, support for these devices at the small business level is absolutely shit. i work at a small company, and we often have people out of the office, so we picked up a few blackberries for them.

      unfortunately, because we only have three, we are unable to get our network provider to allow us to use anything more spohisticated than the 'Mail connector' which is an UNSIGNED activeX control which you have to download and it pushes the mail from the desktop to the device. you cant access old mail with it, only what you receive when the Mail COnnector is running.

      once the contract is up we will be binning them and getting windows mobiles to replace them - it might be more MS vendor lockin, but at least it does what i want it to do. our network provider si Vodafone, so if you are considering getting a small number of Blackberries, i woul explore other providors - they may be no better (o2 are certainly Fuckign Abysmal at everything they do - unlikely to be any better at this.)

    20. Re:good by Minwee · · Score: 1
      Actually, they were hiring you for your ability to work at RIM. If you can't even show a little grace when faced with a few simple puzzles in an interview, what good would you be when faced with a real challenge?

      "Can you help us out a bit? Release 6 is scheduled to go out on Monday but something isn't quite --"

      "Does your little problem involve multiplying large numbers or any kind of crypto-math?"

      "No, I just thought you could take a look at --"

      "Figures. That's not what I was hired for. Now if you'll excuse me it's 4:59 and I'm going home."

      That's the kind of employee I would not want to hire.

    21. Re:good by thecardinal · · Score: 1

      I've got a 7230 by my side right now. 5 days continual usage, and battery is now at 60%. That is pretty darned awesome performance.

      Its a fantastic example of well implemented technology, aimed squarely at the right market. It does just what it says on the tin, no bells or whistles. Nothing comes close.

    22. Re:good by acoustix · · Score: 1
      "Typically, if you use the Blackberry, it doesn't last very long. I'm sure that's where the 10 hours comes from. I know from experience the batteries don't last very long when used...which is common sense."

      Yeah, you're probably right. I'm sure if I actually used the BB 7750 it wouldn't last very long. I mean I only use it for corporate email, weather reports, contacts, calendar, Google services, ... oh yeah and a phone!

      -Nick

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    23. Re:good by thecardinal · · Score: 1

      Got a 7230 here, connected via a BES to a mailbox that takes in a couple of thousand mails per week. I leave it on to make sure the date/times sync up nicely.

      Typically get over 7 days usage, thats left on 24 hours a day. Right now, after 5 days, its at 50%.

    24. Re:good by metlin · · Score: 1


      Anubis is alive!!!!!!!1111!!!111oneone

    25. Re:good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you think he failed? I would rather have
      someone willing to speak up working for me than
      some sycophant.

    26. Re:good by po8 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How is this insightful? I'm a Ph.D. computer scientist with more than 20 years computing experience in a variety of areas. I have a long list of employers who will talk glowingly about my problem-solving skills. If RIM or Google or Microsoft or whoever tried to give me a puzzle-solving test in a job interview at this point in my career, I'd walk out.

      One of my closest friends walked out of Sequent on this basis some years ago. He's now one of the most successful (and employable) computer people in the industry. As for Sequent...dead dead dead. Speaking of which, how is RIM doing these days?

      Puzzle-solving tests in interviews may be appropriate for folks who haven't already solidly demonstrated their problem-solving skills in their application domain in some other way. For the rest of us, IMHO it's really a bit insulting; on the order of a hazing exercise. A certain class of manager will predictably reject folks who are unwilling to be hazed. I don't have much interest in working for those folks.

    27. Re:good by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      Finally I turned around "do you know how to build a cryptosystem or multiply large numbers quickly?" The guy said no and I said "figures."

      I was pissed about how superior they felt they were. These are the types that spend little time in society and don't understand that just because you can't do their specialized problem like they can doesn't make you inferior.


      I'm gonna leave this one alone... it would be like beating a child...

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    28. Re:good by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      You need the whole story.

      I was prodded to apply to an open job at the company that had todo with security and software development [not solely crypto mind you].

      I applied.

      They send me a puzzle.

      I finished it [got a small bug in it but it worked mostly].

      Then he drove up to Ottawa to meet me [he was on other business] which was cool. During that interview he proceeded to insult my brother [who was working for the Government of Canada at the moment] for not finishing university saying "he wasn't qualified to be around computers".

      Then he proceeds to rip into the projects I've done saying they have a small-scale user base and I don't know what the real world is like "yet".

      He gives me another set of puzzles, which I apparently solved faster than he did originally [his words not mine] and was in the middle of giving another puzzle when I asked him about the bignum bit.

      I don't mind jumping through a few hoops to show off my talents [hint: libtomcrypt.org] but I have my limits.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    29. Re:good by MixPix · · Score: 1

      I have used my blackberry as a personal device for about a year. I get around a week of battery life on my 7280. If I browse the net and download files it still lasts around 3-4 days. (I have 3 months unlimited right now)

      I'm on Rogers in Canada and my plan is only $45. (150min anytime calling / .5MB of data) It's enough data for getting email and checking movie times/weather once in a while.

      Cell phone companies are lame. Where are 500min phone plans for $20-$30??.

    30. Re:good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $45 / 450 kb = $0.001 / byte

      According to that math, it'd be a good deal if I could get floppy disks for $1,440 each. CD-Rs should cost $650,000 each as well.

      Good deal?

      I think not. You have to go back to the days of core memory to find that cheap.

    31. Re:good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Again, since it has to be said, the test is mostly not about your problem solving skills. From what you've said, you probably could solve the tests but it is your attitude that you're above doing what your (potential) employer asks you to do. Your expertise can likely be found elsewhere and as a small employer I'd rather have an employee that attacks a challenge than one that doesn't care all that much.

      As to Sequent, both Google and Microsoft give these tests and they seem to be doing ok so there doesn't seem to be cause/effect between giving tests and not doing so.

      It's about those that still have the spark and those that don't. It seems you've lost yours.

    32. Re:good by multiplexo · · Score: 1
      From what I heard it has a short battery life [10hrs], I know it costs alot and the service providers rape you 7 ways from sunday.

      From what I've heard your sister and mom star in porno flicks that prominently feature Tom Delay and a very well hung stallion. It must be true because I heard it somewhere, which is why I'm posting it on /..

      I'm a Blackberry user through NexTel. The service is the same price as my T-mobile service was and the battery life of my 7510 and 7520 were exemplary, especially given the amount of e-mail I have forwarded to the device.

      It's not a good product for several reasons [not all of which are technical] and I for one would be glad to get rid of them.

      None of which you elaborate on.

      They're a bunch of smartass punks anyways. I went through the job interview process with them in Waterloo and they'd sit you down todo puzzles. Finally I turned around "do you know how to build a cryptosystem or multiply large numbers quickly?" The guy said no and I said "figures."

      Backstory: They were hiring me for my crypto-math knowledge not to see if I could quickly write programs to solve geometric puzzles [which while fun is a bit nerve shaking during an interview].

      Now the truth comes out, you don't like the company because they didn't hire you because you couldn't solve the puzzles and you came off like a dick in the interview. Now who's the "smartass punk" here?

      --
      cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
    33. Re:good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Puzzle solving scores are subject to practice effects (provided a baseline level of intelligence is present). I would find any such psychometric evaluation (and I'm in a related field) for a job interview to be suspect.

    34. Re:good by aaronl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have to agree... the idea of puzzles at an interview is insulting, and doesn't tell you anything about an applicant's ability to the the job.

      There are many problems with doing a puzzle, anyway. What if you're not good at the type of puzzle, or hate puzzles, or your brain is a little fried after bad traffic getting to your interview? Now you're cast aside because while you can write great algorithms, you have trouble figuring out some stupid gimmicky puzzle on the spot.

      This just makes it harder for people to get their foot in the door, and harder for an established person to get into a company. It might not kill a company, but it will keep out some of the best employees. This means that eventually, your competition will eat you alive.

    35. Re:good by Quasar1999 · · Score: 0

      I have a long list of employers who will talk glowingly about my problem-solving skills.

      News flash, no matter what you specialise in, you will not always have a task that is using your specialised training/ability. Sometimes you will be tasked with something different, maybe even something beneath you. The puzzle (or other seemingly irrelevant to the position you're applying for) test is to judge your attitude towards such tasks. How you interact with people when given such tasks is more important long term than how well you do at solving the task, especially in the interview.

      The original poster sounds like someone with very little real world experience. You on the other hand claim you have a list of employers that would talk glowingly of you... I'm willing to bet that's because you didn't challenge their intelligence when they asked you to do something, at worst you may have presented a different solution to their problem. The original poster is being a smartass with nothing to back it up.

      The issue is not so much that puzzles are useful to determine if you are qualified for the job from a book smarts stand point, it's to weed out these people with superiority complexes. At the end of the day, no matter how smart you are, if you don't function well with others in a team, or are unable to take direction/instruction from your supervisor, you are useless.

      --

      ---
      Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    36. Re:good by admelior · · Score: 1

      Did the puzzle involve depressing the scroll wheel of a poorly-backlit LCD device at _just the right time_ while driving with your knees?

    37. Re:good by myov · · Score: 1

      They're not on Rogers. The other carriers are cheaper but don't have the coverage. Now that all 3 cell carriers are part of a phone/cable monopoly (fido = rogers), I don't expect things to change either.

      I won't start on my customer service issues here, but I'll say that right now, I'd be happy with 500 minutes without over charges, and some sort of credit if I don't use all my minutes.

      What we need is an American carrier and number portability before rates will drop.

      --
      I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
    38. Re:good by MixPix · · Score: 1

      $45 also includes voice, but your point is good.

    39. Re:good by mobiGeek · · Score: 1

      Have you looked at Pylon Anywhere ?

      --

      ...Beware the IDEs of Microsoft...

    40. Re:good by marktoml · · Score: 1

      >This means that eventually, your competition will eat you alive.

      Unless they like puzzles too :)

  9. Treo is killing it anyway by greenmars · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Doesn't matter -- the Treo 650 is killing the Blackberry anyway. Once I found I could manage my servers with PalmVNC on the Treo, that was it for me.

    1. Re:Treo is killing it anyway by uofitorn · · Score: 2, Funny

      "PalmVNC"
      Sounds like someone is managing Windows servers!

      --
      "What kind of music do pirates listen to?" -Paul Maud'dib
      "Yeeeaaarrrrr n' Bee!!" -Stilgar, Leader of Sietch Tabr
    2. Re:Treo is killing it anyway by J+Barnes · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Taking a quick look at the Washington DC Area subway population, and you'll realize how faulty your premise is. The technology in a Treo may be far more advanced, but the user base of blackberries is astoundingly deep in some organizations...organizations that are loathe to transition 300+ users to anything different.

    3. Re:Treo is killing it anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      have you looked at http://www.idokorro.com/ I manage my servers thorough ssh, (guess I don't need gui to do it) And how long does your treo last on a charge? What about having to wait for your e-mail!! yeah treo rulez (note the sarcasm)

    4. Re:Treo is killing it anyway by 18hrs · · Score: 1
      ummm.. what? where?

      Not in the corporate demographic at least..

      The Blackberry is huge and quickly becoming a commodity with pretty much every corporate client I've worked with. And not to take anything away from the Treo 650, it may be great, I just haven't seen one.

    5. Re:Treo is killing it anyway by Mr_Silver · · Score: 2, Informative
      Doesn't matter -- the Treo 650 is killing the Blackberry anyway.

      Over here in the UK, only one operator sells the Treo (Orange) and the others aren't remotely interested in them. As such, Blackberry's heavily outnumber Treo's.

      Once I found I could manage my servers with PalmVNC on the Treo, that was it for me.

      To be fair, I don't think that really is a killer reason for the majority of people.

      Don't forget that Microsoft are also hot on the heels with their SP2 for Exchange 2003 (linky) so this isn't a good time for RIM.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    6. Re:Treo is killing it anyway by wing03 · · Score: 1

      What about having to wait for your e-mail!

      One word and one link. ChatterEmail.

    7. Re:Treo is killing it anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called a "corporate status symbol" for a reason.

      And yet, in real life I never see ANY ordinary people using Blackberry...I WORK in Waterloo, Ontario and the only ones carrying them around are RIM employees (and they get them for free).

    8. Re:Treo is killing it anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's because you don't work for the right corporations. I know many companies (mine included) that are rolling out Treo 650s to everyone, replacing the Blackberries. With GoodLink Software, the Treo 650 can do everything the Blackberry can do, plus it has the following that the Blackberry doesn't have:
      • An OS you can install things into
      • Camera (not useful for everyone, I know)
      • Movie camera (ditto)
      • Real web browser that does some Javascript and SSL
      • MP3 Player (you'd be surprised at the number of Wall Street types who don't have an iPod and use their phone instead)
      • Bluetooth (though the newer BBs have this too)
      • Hotsync with more than just Exchange!
      • Wireless hotsync!
      • SD card slot
      • Software to open Office documents
      • More games than you can shake a stick at
      • VNC, SSH, SMS, MMS, IM
      • VPN Clients! (Mergic, for instance)


      Those are all things that are missing on the Blackberry (again, noting that some of the newer ones have Bluetooth). I routinely use my phone to connect to my Linux box at home with SSH, and if I forget to kill my Evolution session I can use PalmVNC to connect and kill it.

      None of that is possible on a Blackberry. Sure, I can get my corporate email for now, but it'll be replaced in the next few months by a Treo 650 (and then I'll have two! ;) )

    9. Re:Treo is killing it anyway by o517375 · · Score: 1

      Probably, but VNC runs on UNIX also. And I think the 650 has an ssh client. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

    10. Re:Treo is killing it anyway by CynicalGuy · · Score: 1

      That may say more about the subway population than the device. In the NYC subways, Treos are definitely becoming more common. Not nearly as ubiquitous as iPods though :)

    11. Re:Treo is killing it anyway by crawling_chaos · · Score: 1

      Plus the Treos don't work well on the Subway. Verizon is considered to be a weak Treo vendor and they provide the signal on the Metro exclusively until 2017.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    12. Re:Treo is killing it anyway by CynicalGuy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You do realize that this patent could affect the Treo keyboard also, right? RIM and Handspring fought their own bitter legal fight over the exact same patent.

    13. Re:Treo is killing it anyway by thecardinal · · Score: 1

      The Blackberry is a Java device; you can run a Java VNC client on it. Check?

    14. Re:Treo is killing it anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Java on the TREO sucks. Try running something in the background in java on the Treo when you switch to another app...woops, you can't with coding a JNI portion which is nontrivial giving the minimal documentation available. Big problem.

      On the Blackberry, there are well documented and published API's for that as well as many other things I've had to jump through hoops to do on the Treo.

      Palms are good for stuff developed in C/C++ for Palm. And the Treo is a Palm.

    15. Re:Treo is killing it anyway by aaamr · · Score: 1

      Um.... not really. The Blackberry hits a very nice demographic of users who just want to do basic PDA + email functionality. Same sweet spot (minus the email) that the original Palm devices hit. I don't want to balance my checkbook, listen to MP3s, watch videos, or have a mobile gaming console on my Blackberry. I want to stay in touch and manage my life.

      It does that excellently.

      Plus, the keyboard on the Treo is just simply awful compared to the Blackberry. The Clie keyboards were adequate, but nothing beats the BB keybaord.

    16. Re:Treo is killing it anyway by davemabe · · Score: 3, Informative

      There *is* a BlackBerry port of the J2ME VNC client software. You'll have to think of another reason to justify the money you spent on the Treo 650. There are a couple reasons - like perhaps you prefer to have to retrieve mail rather than have it pushed to you immediately.

    17. Re:Treo is killing it anyway by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      While I agree with your end assessment of the loyalty to crack berry (i.e. crackberry service STILL worked during 9/11 when cell phone lines were down due to high system usage), what organization has 300+ crackberry users that does not see such a transition cost as negligent? Though I would assume if blackberry had to refund all of their clients they would go bankrupt in a major way...

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    18. Re:Treo is killing it anyway by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      fortunately, since the medium is email, shouldn't they be very interoperable if only some of your people want to switch?

    19. Re:Treo is killing it anyway by frinky525 · · Score: 2, Informative

      you manage your servers using vnc? that's a pity. i manage all of mine using pssh on my treo 650 :)

    20. Re:Treo is killing it anyway by Curmudgeonlyoldbloke · · Score: 1

      Hate to say it, but your average Slashdot reader isn't exactly "target market" for RIM. PHBs like Blackberries because you don't need any technical knowledge to work it, just an opposable thumb. IT departments like them because of the server-based control of the device (what an end-user can do with it and what they can install) they're easy to manage and because they "just work". Financial people like them because of the fixed, relatively low, cost.

      In the businesses that I visit the real competition seems to be from Windows-based PDAs rather than Palms, and increasingly from GPRS cards.

      (for the record I'd better express an interest - I work for a company that, among other things, sells mobile data applications, targetting Blackberry and to a lesser extent Windows Mobile devices. I currently have a PDA (a three-year-old Handspring), a Blackberry (initially foisted on me by my employer that it would now be difficult to do without) and, right now, two VNC sessions to remote servers open).

    21. Re:Treo is killing it anyway by Zro+Point+Two · · Score: 4, Informative

      * An OS you can install things into
      What kind of things can't you install on the BlackBerry OS? Just about any Java app I have run across has been able to be installed.

      * Camera (not useful for everyone, I know)
      * Movie camera (ditto)

      Part of the reason some reporters like it is that it doesn't have a camera and therefore can be taken into courtrooms when they are not allowing cameraphones into the courtroom.

      * Real web browser that does some Javascript and SSL
      The BlackBerry browser supports some Javascript, SSL, and WTL.

      * MP3 Player (you'd be surprised at the number of Wall Street types who don't have an iPod and use their phone instead)
      I still havn't thought of a use for an MP3 player on a phone for me, so I'm going to leave this.

      * Bluetooth (though the newer BBs have this too)
      I will admit that this Bluetooth is just for voice, and if I recall correctly, the Treo is Data also.

      * Hotsync with more than just Exchange!
      UHHHHH....have you even seen the list of supported PIM applications for the BlackBerry? Just as extensive as any of the Palms...because it's made by the same company that makes the sync software for the Palm. Outlook, Outlook Express, Act!, Notes, GroupWise, ASCII (csv), Netscape, and Lotus Organizer.
      Or are you speaking of servers? How about itegration with Exchange, GroupWise, and Domino? All three major platforms for business communication (not counting POP servers). And that's FULL integration with those, not just getting email from them. But if you just wanna do POP into the mailbox, that's supported by the web client...so is Outlook Web Access, iNotes, POP, IMAP, AOL, Hotmail, etc.

      * Wireless hotsync!
      This is also available, but granted, it does take a BlackBerry Enterprise Server running 4.0 software and the BlackBerry has to be on OS 4.0

      * SD card slot
      I'm glad it doesn't have an SD slot. It would be too easy to pull the SD card out of a BlackBerry and therefore steal all my information. Which brings up the point of security...and how the BlackBerry was built with secuity in mind.

      * Software to open Office documents
      Word doc's...check. Excell spreadsheets...check. jpg, gif, png, tiff...check. PDF's...check. HTML...check. TXT...check. What kind of office documents are you talking?

      * More games than you can shake a stick at
      There are lots of games for the BlackBerry, and probably any game for a cell phone can be installed over the air onto a BlackBerry...as long as it's a midlet game. But there are also a couple of game only developer sites for the BlackBerry. But then again, this is a business tool, not a gameboy.

      * VNC, SSH, SMS, MMS, IM
      SMS...check. MMS...check. IM...Check (and more being added). SSH...with the right software...check. VNC...Not sure, but I believe there is a VNC viewer available.

      * VPN Clients! (Mergic, for instance)
      Not really needed on the BlakcBerry...cause you are able to browse your intranet on the BlackBerry with just the regular BlackBerry browser.

      Sometimes, it's good to do some research first.

      The thing that the BlackBerry does, and does better than anyone...secure email integration. I'd like to see someone sniff one of my emails out of the air. Native 3DES encryption, and AES encryption coming available. Let's not forget the nice S/MIME encryption that is available for Enterprise users.

      What else would you like me to educate you on about the BlackBerry?

      And just so that no one thinks differently, I am not saying the BlackBerry is better than the Treo (aside from a secuity standpoint)...I think they both have their market. I just don't want anyone thinking that because this guy didn't do his research, they shouldn't either.

      --
      Zro . two

      "I come from Canada...they say I'm slow....eh?"
    22. Re:Treo is killing it anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree. Where I work Blackberries outnumber Treo's 6:1. It's mostly a reliability thing. Blackberries very reliably recieve e-mail within seconds, Treos with GoodLink software often drop connection and don't auotmatically reconnect (though this has gotten better with the 650) causing e-mail delays. In fact I have the choice of carrying either a Treo or a Blackberry with me and I almost exclusively carry the Blackberry. It's easier to type on and much more reliable. The Treo just sits on my desk all day.

      :

    23. Re:Treo is killing it anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our company purchased 13 Treo 600s last year and I ended up replacing 10 of them within 6 months. All of the problems were either related to defective headsets or crappy LCD screens. None of the problems were related to idiot users dropping the phones (miraculously).

      $500 for a shitty Treo I need to replace in a few months (or can get a refurb from Handspring in the first year, which again will break even quicker), or just $199 for the 7100t that isn't the size of 20 oz Coke bottle when I hold it up to my ear to talk on it. I think BlackBerry makes some very useful and thought out products, and after all the money we've invested in a BlackBerry Entersprise Server and about 30 devices for a Bay Area construction company, this news is a bit troubling.

    24. Re:Treo is killing it anyway by snorklewacker · · Score: 1

      I'm glad it doesn't have an SD slot. It would be too easy to pull the SD card out of a BlackBerry and therefore steal all my information.

      Remind me what the "S" in SD stands for again?

      Fact is, the device is good for what it does, which is pretty damn limited. Those of us who need to upload a config from an SD card onto a server they check into with PalmVNC aren't going to use a Blackberry, and we have just as much right as the next blackberry fan to say why. A series of justifications cannot make one device objectively better than another for even a majority of circumstances, let alone all.

      --
      I am no longer wasting my time with slashdot
    25. Re:Treo is killing it anyway by jc42 · · Score: 1

      ... jpg, gif, png, tiff...check. ...

      Funny thing - I've been involved with a project to deliver readable (not playable, but readable) music to various sorts of little computer gadgets. Usually this has involved finding the screen size and sending gif or png files, which do better than jpg or tiff for displaying music notation.

      In the case of the blackberry, I've had near total failure. For reasons that nobody seems to explain, all four of these file types are munged in such a way that some of the horizontal lines (the staffs) disappear. This is a killer bug; it makes the music totally unreadable.

      This doesn't happen with palm devices. If the screen is WxH pixels, I can send a gif or png that's slighly less than W pixels wide, and it displays. But the same gif or png on the blackberry, at any size, will have missing horizontals. Some of the verticals (note stems) are missing, too, but that's more a nuisance than a killer.

      This is a real disappointment. One of my test toys is a BB with an unlimited net-access contract. It would be quite useful for the desired uses. But if I can't get those lines to show on the screen, it's utterly useless for this app.

      (Posted with the hope that someone will say "Oh, the solution is easy; read about it at <URL> ..." If it's any help, the service is via attwireless, not owned by but not integrated with cingular. ;-)

      (I've also been trying to discover how to use the BB as a wireless modem for my Mac Powerbook. Another brick wall.)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    26. Re:Treo is killing it anyway by Zro+Point+Two · · Score: 1

      Image support on the BlackBerry is not native image format. It get's changed to png (I believe), compressed, and sent to the BlackBerry. I'm not totally sure, but I belive the BlackBerry would then need to support png natively. If you try these same images in png format, does that solve the issue?

      --
      Zro . two

      "I come from Canada...they say I'm slow....eh?"
    27. Re:Treo is killing it anyway by Zro+Point+Two · · Score: 1

      Having access to an SD card that can be put into another device is much less secure than removing the flash memory of the device and trying to access that.

      I do agree that an SD card can be handy for some applications, but for just email, not that important on my list.

      And I'm glad we are on the same page with "A series of justifications cannot make one device objectively better than another for even a majority of circumstances, let alone all."

      My post was not to justify the BlackBerry over the Treo/sidekick/set of index cards. It was just to make sure that people know that just about everything that is available on one is available on the other. BlackBerry is more geared towards security and email, the Treo more for multi-purpose functionality.

      --
      Zro . two

      "I come from Canada...they say I'm slow....eh?"
    28. Re:Treo is killing it anyway by arodland · · Score: 1


      Please wait... post loading...

      loading org.slashdot.interface...
      loading org.slashdot.post...
      loading org.slashdot.arodland.profile...
      loading org.slashdot.arodland.sarcasm...

      please wait... verifying bytecode...
      please wait... initializing classes...
      please wait... transmitting data to CIA...
      please wait... twiddling thumbs...


      Java. Check.

    29. Re:Treo is killing it anyway by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Not that I'd ever get a Blackberry or realyl even a Treo, but while the "S" in SD stands for Secure, as far as I've seen, it's just part of the name. Like "Socialism" in "National Socialism," it really doesn't mean anything. If I put vital information on my SD card on my PocketPC or Palm, and someone steals that card, they have access to that info. Unless I used some other app to encrypt it, but that has nothing to do with SD per se.

      Why do you bring up with the S means? Do you know something I don't?

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    30. Re:Treo is killing it anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The blackberry is for untechie business types that don't have the wish to do anything more other than send email and simple pda tasks. the treo 650 appeals to techie types whom want to experience everything the pda world has to offer. Bottom line. If you're a 6'2" smiley sales guy, your fat fingers will be on the blackberry. If you're a geek with slim fingers, you'll be using the treo 650.

    31. Re:Treo is killing it anyway by vgaphil · · Score: 1

      You can also do wireless hotsyncing by using Sync4j

      --
      A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it. -- Einstein
    32. Re:Treo is killing it anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, I have no idea what kind of Blackberry you've got, but none of that crap is available on mine. I've got Brickbreaker, email that only works with the BES and Exchange, and a phone. That's it. I can't install crap on it. It doesn't do anything other than get email. I tried opening a Word doc on it, and I got headers and nothing else. It doesn't charge properly, doesn't have bluetooth, and is in no way expandable.

      All that stuff I mentioned is available and *usable* on the Treo 650. I can grab a PRC and install it myself, I don't need some crazy server. I can use the bluetooth for voice AND data, as you pointed out. I can play and record movies. I can take pictures. Sure, some reporters might not like to go into court with a camera phone, but I bet there are some off-duty ones who love having a camera phone when they're in the middle of something they'd like to report and don't have a crew with them.

      As for security, the Treo 650 has plenty. For starters, your argument that you lose the SD card is specious; you're more likely to lose the whole phone first! Let's be realistic - most people buy a 1GB card and stick it in and leave it in. Most of the programs that I have for my Treo can take advantage of encryption - pSSH does (though not as much as I'd like), Snappermail does, Verichat can, etc. It's got plenty of security, and to say otherwise is being disingenuous.

      Also, your VPN argument sucks - some of us connect to more than one VPN, and we don't just use our phones for the intranet. Being limited to the intranet is a failure of the Blackberry, not something to praise!

      Also, a lot of the "features" you mention require a corporate backend server that can cost thousands of dollars. The Treo 650 works with my corporate Exchange server for $90 - the cost of SnapperMail and the Mergic VPN client. (One of the three VPNs I connect to.) Try getting a lone blackberry to do that! Without that really expensive BES, all of a sudden, you're stuck only being able to get things when you've got your desktop client running and the thing is in the cradle! Yeah, that's really useful.

      The bottom line is that the Blackberry sucks compared to the Treo. Yeah, sure, people will say "use the right tool for the job", but the bottom line is that the Treo 650 does everything that the Blackberry can do AND MORE, so by default, anywhere a Blackberry would be the right tool the Treo 650 is as well, plus, there are places it would be the right tool where the Blackberry isn't. (Emergency server administration comes to mind.) Try rebooting a Linux box remotely from your Blackberry sometime and then come tell me how useful it is!

    33. Re:Treo is killing it anyway by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Nope. PNG was the first format that I tried. It renders a bit better than GIF, but there are still a lot of horizontal and vertical lines that disappear. This happens even if the width of the PNG image is less than the BB's supposed screen width.

      Actually I'm a bit curious about whether I have the correct screen dimensions. It's amazingly difficult to find the numbers, and I'm not sure that I have them right. The numbers that I have are 240x160. So I've tried sending, e.g., 235 x 155 PNG images. The horizontals come out partly missing and partly double thickness. This makes the image useless for the app.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  10. Parent is a forgery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Listen fellow moderators, RTF posting before moderating "informative."

  11. This caught me really off-guard by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    This is because when I read the headline, I thought the Blackberry's future was uncertain because of a massive sales/advertising/marketing assault from Microsoft. I understand M$ is also selling it's own version of a Blackberry....How wrong I was!

  12. Upper middle managers weep with despair by gelfling · · Score: 5, Funny

    Because clearly, Blackberries only exist so that your bosses boss can send you an email with a sig at the bottom that says "sent from Mr. Big's Blackberry (while rolling down the hgwy in his Z4).

    1. Re:Upper middle managers weep with despair by henrywood · · Score: 1

      Couldn't agree more. Why the fsck do I need to know that Mr New Toy sent me an e-mail from his Blackberry.

      And the BES server is a pain in the ass to administer.

      Sent from my Dell OptiPlex GX1 - I'm not proud.

      --
      Something is happening here but you don't know what it is, do you, Mr Jones.
    2. Re:Upper middle managers weep with despair by TheSync · · Score: 1

      I sent my friends email from my Blackberry from the top of Pike's Peak (14,100 feet above sea level).

    3. Re:Upper middle managers weep with despair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my boss's case, it's a Cadillac CTS-V (the one with 400 hp).

    4. Re:Upper middle managers weep with despair by __aafutm5472 · · Score: 1

      I haven't had any problems or complications administering the BES server. Pretty straightforward, after you get it set up (when making it talk to Exchange, you have to copy a DLL from your Exchange server, then register it by hand).

      As for the sig at the end, there is a way to globally turn that off (if you're using BES), and I have, precisely for the reason that you outline -- why do I care that you sent it from your Blackberry? Does it make it more important?

    5. Re:Upper middle managers weep with despair by The_Whole_Fn_Show · · Score: 1

      As for the sig at the end, there is a way to globally turn that off (if you're using BES), and I have, precisely for the reason that you outline -- why do I care that you sent it from your Blackberry?

      Is this w/ BES 4.0? I literally JUST finished adding a new unit and there was no sig by default, and I don't recall making any global changes. It did add those annoying sigs when we were on 3.7, though... :)

    6. Re:Upper middle managers weep with despair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I resemble that remark.

      - Upper middle management - Check!
      - Blackberry device - Check!
      - Z4 - Check!

      The reason for the "sent from my Blackberry" is so the people know a more detailed answer will come later with attachments and links (opps, I'm management so PPTs will also be the main attachment).

    7. Re:Upper middle managers weep with despair by Mistah+Blue · · Score: 1

      It is quite easy to change that sig. I have done it so you don't know whether I'm sending from my BB or my laptop. The only way you'll know I'm sending from my laptop is if you get an RTF or HTML email from me (which would happen in a reply) because I've changed my sending to be plain text. Stealth mode is what I call it.

    8. Re:Upper middle managers weep with despair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Folks, you're missing the point!

      now you don't have to actually listen to anyone and always have a toy for every occassion - I haven't payed attention in church for months!

      There's something about checking traffic when you're stuck and finding exactly where the accident ahead is.

      Oh, and it is ok for work assuming your job makes you travel or just not be in your office.

    9. Re:Upper middle managers weep with despair by __aafutm5472 · · Score: 1

      Yep, BES 4.0. Thinking back, I believe you're right -- I think it is turned off by default. Be aware, though, that it's possible to turn it on at the device level, too, so some of those oh-so-important middle managers could turn it on, if they can figure it out. Which is unlikely.

  13. snuh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    part of the problem is, RIM got the patent office to reexamine 8 of NTP's patents regarding the technology, and so far the PTO has come out with rejections on each proceeding they've done.

    this adds a layer of complication to the infringement case, as no doubt some part of the deal rested on the outcome of those proceedings.

  14. No suprise there. by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Informative

    The company I work at recently yanked all blackberry devices and replaced them with Treo 600 and treo 650's.

    the fact that you dont need any "special" software to access email and has the capability of viewing doc and excel attachments was the death spike for the blackberry here at this company.

    and honestly, the treo's have much better sounding audio for phone calls than even the latest blackberry's did.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:No suprise there. by Remlik · · Score: 1

      Does a treo integrate seemlessly into an Exchange mail server though? The beauty of the Blackberry and blackberry server software is that you didn't have to use any forwarding rules and secondary email servers or addresses. Emails sent to and from my BB are infact right out of my exchange server profile.

      Perhaps the Treo's work this way as well but I don't see how that can be without some other form of server side software designed to work with the devices and the Service provider.

      This little beauty tells me it probably doesn't work that way "3 Email, messaging and web browsing require wireless data services from a mobile service provider at an additional cost. ISP may also be required. Pricing varies by service provider. Wireless service coverage may not be available in all areas."

      The BES server integrates into your existing Exchange server, and uses its bandwidth for mobile data and email transmission. You don't have to pay extra for a data link. You also get neat things like Idokorro's Admin product that allows me to manage my servers from my handheld. Granted there are probabaly forms of this product for the Treo and other handhelds I just haven't looked yet.

      I'll give you that the Treo is probably a better sounding phone as I've been rather disapointed with the sound of mine, but overall I think its a step back from what blackberry is offering.

      What I'd like to see are more Windows based phones. MS has announced a FREE (as in beer) upgrade to Exchange which will give it BB style messaging built in. But it requires (of course) a windows based phone to use it.

      Anyway, I like my BB, and i like what it offers. I have not found a better offering yet for the price and easy of use.

      --
      Apple free since 1990!
    2. Re:No suprise there. by vgaphil · · Score: 1

      You can edit/view Word and Excel attachments with eOffice.

      --
      A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it. -- Einstein
    3. Re:No suprise there. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, yeah. A friend at a recent class showed his to me and it basically looks like regular Outlook, except you can only see one of the three standard frames at a time. It was accessing his regular exchange account just fine. He did have to pay extra for the data link, but it had the added bonus of gps so we used it as a nav device when we got lost.

    4. Re:No suprise there. by subodhg · · Score: 1, Informative

      You can view DOC/EXCEL files from BB too. I can even open PDF/JPG/GIF files.

    5. Re:No suprise there. by dan+the+person · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the Treo's work this way as well but I don't see how that can be without some other form of server side software designed to work with the devices and the Service provider.

      It's called IMAP, and yes exchange supports it.

      This little beauty tells me it probably doesn't work that way "3 Email, messaging and web browsing require wireless data services from a mobile service provider at an additional cost. ISP may also be required. Pricing varies by service provider. Wireless service coverage may not be available in all areas."

      That doesn't mean your cellphone provider has to provide special support for the treo. It just means you have to have data as well as voice setup on your cellphone account. e.g. you need GPRS or whatever they use in the USA.

    6. Re:No suprise there. by Ohm2k · · Score: 1

      How old was your BB? Did you never bother to update the firmware? It is a very simple process, No data is lost and our users can do it themself. I have the ability to view word and excel documents as well as most PDF files. As for E-mail, The treo is ok if you have a pop3/imap system and don't mind your device checking for email all the time. The BB does alot, but people are loosing track of the fact it was not made to do everything. It's there to keep you in touch with your office, not BE your office. The BB is VERY GOOD at what it does, in fact the BEST at it. and that's E-mail. You will find NO BETTER device. And with the addition of Realtime updates to the calander wireless (A big deal when you have a sectuary who runs your life for you) and improved phone quality you now have a great BUSNESS device. If you want a camera, MP3 player, Game unit, Phone, Toaster, bread machine, kitchen sink device by all means grab a treo. If you want to remain in touch with the office at all times then BB is the only real choice.

      --
      People find it strange that I don't know how to juggle or tap dance.
    7. Re:No suprise there. by thecardinal · · Score: 1, Troll

      You didn't research the market at all, did you? The BB (at least via a BES) does seamless integration with your exchange servers, works close to perfectly (BES seems to be massively more reliable than the exchange servers they rely on).

      They open word/excel/pdf good enough for most people. v4 of the software handles images massively better. And as another poster has mentioned, you can edit word/excel docs as well. Oh, and we are shipping out a couple of thousand of these ... throughout europe.

      They (Blackberry) make a very good business e-mail device, I doubt you'll find anything that works better. I'll be intrigued to find out how good the M$ product "works".

      I've used Pop/imap on my mobile, and its pretty lousy in comparison to Blackberry push technology.

    8. Re:No suprise there. by Cyn · · Score: 1

      It should be noted that you have to pay for that data channel with either device. In fact, with tmobile for example - you pay a flat fee of $40 USD for your Blackberry, with no calling time. If you have a Treo - you pay $30 for a data plan with no calling time.

      With the Treo, you can use their standard voice plans (and then the data plan is only $20 a month) - with the Blackberry, you have a $70 and a $90 1000 and 1500 minute plan. The Blackberry *does* include 300 text messages a month in the base plan, which you'd have to pay extra for with the Treo - but I don't imagine anyone with these devices will be sending many when they have real internet/email available.

      All of this is just based off an example of tmobile (obviously) - but it comes down to the fact that you have to have a Blackberry server to handle the proxying/etc. for the Blackberry devices, and that's always going to cost extra. Both devices will still always need a cellular data plan to actually receive the data features they provide.

      tmobile's Blackberry plan is more expensive because tmobile has to own a Blackberry server for their devices (no doubt more than one) - plus it's traditionally a business oriented device so they can gouge you a bit more.

      my vote is for the Treo. Wait for the 650 though, the screen upgrade alone is worth it (bluetooth DUN needs enabling though).

      --
      cyn, free software and *nix operating systems enthusiast.
    9. Re:No suprise there. by Cyn · · Score: 1

      I neglected to mention, and it should be noted, that the Blackberrys do have one important feature going for them, and that's push mail. The Treo has to be explicitly told to check for mail at intervals - so you do lose out there.

      Also, since they are more closed and limited - you probably would run into fewer support costs if implemented at a business or the likes - since people wouldn't be installing 3rd party software on them like they would with a Palm PDA like the Treo.

      --
      cyn, free software and *nix operating systems enthusiast.
    10. Re:No suprise there. by daviddennis · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I helped my boss(*) purchase a handheld about a week ago. It was between the Blackberry and Treo 650. The sales guy was heavily pushing the Treo, but I thought the Blackberry was much better for his needs. It worked with his university calendar web site, which the Treo didn't, and the Treo has a nearly unusable keyboard compared to the Blackberry's nice one.

      He bought the Blackberry and has been very happy with it so far. It accesses his email just fine even though we don't have the Blackberry server package. He just uses IMAP, which is no problem at all.

      I think my T-Mobile Sidekick is still the better device for reading web pages and emails but that's because of the flip out design with the bigger screen. T-Mobile's service is erratic and so I think he made the right choice to go with the inferior device but much more reliable Verizon network.

      One interesting point is that the Blackberry appears to have some form of JavaScript support, although it slows everything to a crawl. Whenever I saw a massive delay in loading a web site, the "Running JavaScript" appeared on the bottom. My Sidekick, which doesn't support JavaScript, loaded things much better, but of course many features were not available. I think the Blackberry needs a faster CPU to deal with JS issues. Hopefully one will be forthcoming.

      D

      (*) Far from a PHB. So we now have proof that not all Blackberry users are PHBs, despite what some of you might think.

    11. Re:No suprise there. by Tinik · · Score: 1

      You could also get a Windows CE/Pocket PC based mobile and have it integrate into an Exchange 2003 server without having to buy the $5000 software package. Plus, in addition to sending and recieving email and getting real-time email notification through SMS, you can syncronize your calendar and contacts with the server. This lets your office make schedule changes on the fly and the changes will be recieved in Outlook on your laptop (thanks to RPC over HTTP), on your mobile and in the web interface instantaniously. Of course, to do all this, you have to have Exchange 2003, Windows server 2003, Outlook 2003, Windows XP and the latest Windows CE. Any less on any of it, and you lose most of those features.

    12. Re:No suprise there. by ejdmoo · · Score: 1

      Treos are licensed to use MS's Exchange server ActiveSync, the same thing the Windows-based phones use, and the same thing that is being upgraded to Direct Push.

      And there's always IMAP.

      "Synchronize your corporate Microsoft Exchange email and calendar with built-in Microsoft Exchange ActiveSync®"

      quote is from this page:
      http://www.palmone.com/us/products/smartphones/tre o650/

    13. Re:No suprise there. by Tryfen · · Score: 1

      Just to say - you can disable JavaScript in the Blackberry.

      Browser -> options -> Browser Configuration -> Support JavaScript

      You can also switch on/off image rendering, tables, flash, svg, stylsheets etc.

      T

      --
      If a square is really a rhombus, why aren't all triangles purple?
    14. Re:No suprise there. by cahiha · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the Treo's work this way as well but I don't see how that can be without some other form of server side software designed to work with the devices and the Service provider.

      The Treo can access mail servers directly--no need for any server-side software installation. And you don't need "push", the Treo supports polling. Mobile Internet rates have come down to the point where that works pretty much as well as "push" for power users.

      The Treo also gives you an excellent web browser and lots of other capabilities that the Blackberry just can't match (I tried both before settling on the Treo).

    15. Re:No suprise there. by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      My co-worker is a staunch defender of crack berry (she hates it when i say that) - but she admits she has a hard time hearing people when on the phone (while she is using the crack berry). I personally think their service is highway robbery. Let us see what you have to pay for:

      Crack berry (expensive, but average cost for such device)
      Corporate black berry software (expensive add-on that is a rip imho)
      Corporate black berry license for each black berry user who wants to access their email (TOTAL 100% rip-off).

      In the end, I think this device is a major cost (anywhere from 500-1000 per device with the licenses).

      My other co-worker has Treo and he likes it, but i know some features he cannot use - does the blackberry do anything the treo cannot (anything of note that is)

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    16. Re:No suprise there. by djrogers · · Score: 3, Informative
      does the blackberry do anything the treo cannot (anything of note that is)
      Seemless real time integration of your Outlook calendar, task list, and memo pad, all push and without sync'ing....
      --
      Think outside the... Hey, where'd the friggin' box go?
    17. Re:No suprise there. by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      How well does it work with JavaScript-heavy pages?

      If you want a laugh someday, try http://www.realtor.com/ and try searching for property.

      it has one of the worst JavaScript dependencies I've ever seen. If you can actually get property listings to come up on it, I'll be pretty impressed with the BlackBerry's JavaScript.

      D

    18. Re:No suprise there. by houdini_cs · · Score: 1

      Actually, free SMS (as many as you can use) comes with the T-Mobile data plan. At least, it does for my Sidekick :)

      --
      ^]:wq
    19. Re:No suprise there. by Dr.+Sp0ng · · Score: 1

      And you don't need "push", the Treo supports polling.

      Or, even better, you can use Chatter, which supports the IMAP Idle command, so it's more-or-less instant, like push, but without constantly polling the server.

    20. Re:No suprise there. by Zro+Point+Two · · Score: 2, Informative

      does the blackberry do anything the treo cannot (anything of note that is)
      What about being secure? 3DES wireless encryption , S/MIME support, and AES encryption.
      Complete integration with your mail server....send/receive/delete/moves/etc.

      Neither of these products are the be all and end all...why do people think that there can be only one?

      So, since everyone is focusing on the cost of the BlackBerry Enterprise Server solution, I think this would also be a good time to mention that each individual carrier will provide a Web Client account that will poll your email accounts and forward email to the BlackBerry. No corporate servers needed at all. Yes it's still polling, but you can also decide to use the direct carrier provided email address to send directly to the BlackBerry.

      --
      Zro . two

      "I come from Canada...they say I'm slow....eh?"
    21. Re:No suprise there. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      seamless my ass.

      it requires specalized software that has to be running, then it requires a special conduit on the server to allow email while on the go.

      The execs and everyone else here love their treo more than their blackberry's. In fact most of them have said, "why did we not switch to these before?" one simple button push and it's synced. the blackberry you always "wondered" and you could do NOTHING with attachments that you needed to read.

    22. Re:No suprise there. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is push mail for the Treo if your server supports IMAP. You should check out Chatter mail.
      http://www.chatteremail.com/

    23. Re:No suprise there. by Cyn · · Score: 1

      Sidekick only I'm afraid, though you might be able to fight it, I wouldn't bank on it - terms are terms...

      Enjoy it :)

      --
      cyn, free software and *nix operating systems enthusiast.
  15. Do anyone know what the patent is about? by ID000001 · · Score: 1

    I for one am interested to see what kind of patent it is to have the power to demand 450 millions. Is it called "Device that send out e-mail wirelessly" or is it just the thumb keyboard? After reading the story it doesn't seem to give me the full picture.

    1. Re:Do anyone know what the patent is about? by Badfysh · · Score: 1

      I can only find vague references to "Wireless Technology". I too would love to know what is so special about the system RIM uses. A lot of ordinary GSM phones these days can send and receive email via GPRS, I always thought a Blackberry was just a phone with a qwerty keyboard.

      --

      I was conned by an old man in a cloak. It turns out those *were* the droids I was looking for.

  16. Why not give us a choice by tcoady · · Score: 4, Informative

    instead of "yadda yadda" each time you link to NYT. Like this:
    http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&ie=UTF-8& q=ntp+rim

    1. Re:Why not give us a choice by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      That's a lovely idea, but it's completely useless for drawing notice to a particular article, only to a particular story. That isn't always what you want, and entails further effort than simply noting an interesting story and firing off a quick /. submission (which is 99% likely to get rejected anyway, so the time you spend on it is 99% likely to be wasted).

      If the NYT login bothers you that much, do what everyone else does and download the BugMeNot Firefox plugin.

      This way the poster doesn't waste time unnecessarily (so they aren't discouraged from submitting further articles), BugMeNot gets another convert (which is good, because it's a brilliant service), and NYTimes' user-demographics go further out of whack thanks to their stupid and obnoxious sign-in requirement... I count that as a win all-round...

      And if you insist on getting a perfectly balanced view of an issue, you, personally, can always choose to search Google news for other accounts of it, without wasting the time of everyone who'd rather just click and see a single article from a known source...

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    2. Re:Why not give us a choice by bmalnad · · Score: 1

      Why not give us a choice... Define: kickback

      --
      Free Scotland!
    3. Re:Why not give us a choice by tcoady · · Score: 1

      Interesting point; I hadn't considered the conspiracy angle, but this might explain why /. always links to yahoo news or NYT when reporting generic news events. Also why submissions get rejected if they link to a non-kickback. Oh well I guess someone has to pay.

    4. Re:Why not give us a choice by tcoady · · Score: 1

      Don't have a special problem with NYT and already use bugmenot but thanks for that heads up. It's not just balance but stuff like aesthetics; I can't stand the look of any yahoo! site for example. As for getting submissions accepted, perhaps the way to get in is to link to NYT with the mandatory warnings? But I accept your other points.

    5. Re:Why not give us a choice by amrust · · Score: 1

      Careful guys, you know what happens to whistleblowers.

      --
      VOTE!
  17. What I Don't Get by value_added · · Score: 3, Insightful
    From the article:

    Final talks in a patent infringement lawsuit involving the popular BlackBerry e-mail messaging device have reached an impasse, the two companies involved said Thursday, raising the possibility that the BlackBerry service could be banned from the United States market.

    What I don't get is how the Blackberry, being so popular with members of our legislature, wound up on the wrong side of a patent lawsuit. To wit: Legislative Branch Subcommittee Hearing on the FY05 Budget [2004]:

    In the past two years, the Senate provided BlackBerry devices and updated electronic pagers to Senators and key staff. The number of BlackBerry devices in use at the Senate continues to expand. Every office has a Senate "Group Alert" telephone system and approximately 1,000 telephones throughout the Senate are connected to the System.

    Can't imagine someone informing members of the Senate they have to turn in their favourite devices because they're no longer legal.

    1. Re:What I Don't Get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps the American congress hasn't joined in the fight because RIM is a Canadian company. Just saying.

  18. Call me cynical... by ElitistWhiner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    but a Blackberry is the only mobile device that actually adds-value to wireless communications. Really... who needs a cameraphone to communicate? Do we need MP3phones?

    It is time for the US Gov't to use the power of Imminent Domain to put this rights case in the hands of the common good.

    1. Re:Call me cynical... by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      That would be Eminent Domain

    2. Re:Call me cynical... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      And how is RIM making a ton of money "the common good"
      Yea NTP sucks but this is hardly what I would call the common good.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:Call me cynical... by CynicalGuy · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call you cynical.. Just ignorant..

    4. Re:Call me cynical... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes we need mp3 phones. why? because it means 1 less device to carry round + phones already have all the necessary components for an mp3 player.

    5. Re:Call me cynical... by platos_beard · · Score: 1

      Well, other posters have mentioned the Treo. There's also PocketPC phones and the Hiptop/Sidekick. I'll really love my Sidekick as soon as it gets Javascript in the browser (real soon now....).

      Most /.ers will probably hate it though since TMobile & Danger go out of their way to make it hard to add anything to the system that you didn't pay for. For me, it's a phone/email/ssh*/browser and I don't really care that I'd have to pay to get games or ringtones. (*one-time charge for ssh)

      --
      What's a sig?
  19. The Article by Southpaw018 · · Score: 3, Informative
    Bah to BugMeNot.

    OTTAWA, June 9 - Final talks in a patent infringement lawsuit involving the popular BlackBerry e-mail messaging device have reached an impasse, the two companies involved said Thursday, raising the possibility that the BlackBerry service could be banned from the United States market.

    The two companies, Research in Motion of Waterloo, Ontario, which makes the BlackBerry, and NTP, a small patent-holding company in Arlington, Va., reached a settlement in March to end an infringement suit that is three and a half years old. R.I.M. agreed at the time to pay NTP the unusually large sum of $450 million to end the suit.

    On Thursday, however, it was apparent that negotiations to reach a final settlement had failed.

    Late Wednesday night, R.I.M. asked a United States federal court to enforce the settlement reached in March. Meanwhile, in court papers filed Thursday, NTP denied that the settlement was ever clear-cut, and urged the court to reject R.I.M.'s request.

    In a conference call Thursday with analysts, James L. Balsillie, the chairman and co-chief executive of R.I.M., said he could not comment on the specifics of why the talks had foundered, citing a confidentiality agreement between the companies. He emphasized, though, that R.I.M. had not tried to alter the settlement's terms, and blamed NTP for the impasse.

    "This is an enormous amount of money, one of the largest settlements in the history of any patent system," Mr. Balsillie said. "I'm at a loss to understand what in the world one would want beyond that."

    In its filing, however, NTP said that it had pressed R.I.M. for a complete set of documents detailing the terms of the agreement during three days of negotiations in March.

    "Nevertheless, because of R.I.M.'s pressing need to leave town, the signed agreement was limited to a vague, ambiguously worded term sheet," the court papers said.

    NTP had won the right to ban Blackberry e-mail in the United States in an earlier court decision, but that ruling was suspended when R.I.M. appealed. In its filing Thursday, though, NTP said that if no settlement was reached, it would again ask for an injunction on the sale of BlackBerry pagers and e-mail service in the United States. Research in Motion is dependent on Blackberry sales in the United States for about 75 percent of its revenues.

    Gregory E. Upchurch, an intellectual property lawyer in St. Louis, said that about 80 percent of the time, courts enforced previously announced settlements. "Courts are in the business of resolving disputes," he said.

    --
    ACs are modded -6. I don't read you, I don't mod you, I don't see you. Don't like it? Don't be a coward.
    1. Re:The Article by JLSigman · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the article. I'm'a forward it on to the rest of the IT Department and the purchasing guy, so we can be prepared to have to replace, oh, 50 BlackBerry's in 6 states. :-p

      --
      -jls
      Techno-pagan
  20. pretty frickin ironic... by potus98 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...That this is the first site/article I've opened on my blacberry in a week. Sure wish /. Had a more mobile-friendly format. Actually, I'll take /. Working in my firefox first!

    --
    This one gang kept wanting me to join cause I'm pretty good with a bo staff.
    1. Re:pretty frickin ironic... by ScytheBlade1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, we understood every word of that. Completly coherent. ;)

      Mobile friendly? Well, for reading...

    2. Re:pretty frickin ironic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try the light interface works well for me with my blackberry..

  21. Future in the Microsoft space uncertain as well by hoyty · · Score: 1

    This week Microsoft announced they will begin doing push email for all Windows Mobile devices from Exchange. This was the last key differentiator for RIM. Without that, they are simply just another Cell Phone / PIM / Email device. Oh and Microsoft is giving this away for free, so no need to buy RIM's enterprise software.

    --
    Hoyty
    1. Re:Future in the Microsoft space uncertain as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hm...could M$ be behind NTP's actions?

    2. Re:Future in the Microsoft space uncertain as well by Broiler · · Score: 1

      Oh and Microsoft is giving this away for free, so no need to buy RIM's enterprise software.

      They are NOT giving away Exchange 2003, which is required for push e-mail to work with Windows Mobile.

      --
      My sigs offend the max # of people all over the world, regardless of race, religion, color, sex or creed. It's a gift.
    3. Re:Future in the Microsoft space uncertain as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to clarify the Microsoft competition point:

      The 'push' technology similar to the Blackberry devices is to be included in Exchange Service Pack 2.

      Which will... may be released towards the end of 2005.

      http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/downloads/2003/s p2/overview.mspx#mobile

  22. Patent Details by lazarus · · Score: 4, Informative
    I found a copy of the original August 5, 2003 ruling here (pdf).

    According to this court document, the infrigments concern:

    • Claims 15, 32, 34 of #5,436,960
    • Claim 8 of #5,625,670
    • Claim 199 of #5,819,172
    • Claims 28, 248, 309, 313, 317 of #6,067,451
    • Claims 40, 150, 278, 653, 654 of #6,317,592
    These patents can be found here:

    5,436,960
    5,625,670
    5,819,172
    6,067,451
    6,317,592

    These patents look to me like they would cover just about every PDA and cell phone on the planet today. Is RIM a target because of their popularity?

    --
    I am not interested in articles about life extension advancements.
    1. Re:Patent Details by hamburger+lady · · Score: 2, Informative

      the patent claims don't stand on their own.

      if you slog through all the court transcripts, you'll find hearings where claim terminology was heavily narrowed for the purposes of the infringement. that means, according to the court, the claims were hella more specific than they let on at first glance.

      --

      ---
      Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
    2. Re:Patent Details by EvilNecro · · Score: 1

      Hell, it looks like this would cover me sending an email from my laptop over 802.11 or bluetooth to someone else with a similar setup.

    3. Re:Patent Details by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      Is RIM a target because of their popularity?

      I suspect they became more of a target as their "ability to pay" increased.

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
  23. a canadian perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    RIM is an allright company and for folks like me in Canada, the only decent company where I could work. Now some stupid little american company is gonna hit on my employment. And that other company in Redmond is in the fray as well. How can a keyboard on a mobile device be proprietary to anyone ? isn't it part of say, common sense, or part of natural evolution of technology. Rot in hell NTP. But why did RIM have to depend on a proprietary hardware device anywayz...what's so innovative about THAT ? Rest in Peace RIM.

  24. Patent reform idea by chiph · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd like to see a law passed that says that while you may be granted a patent on an invention or idea, if you fail to produce a viable product based on it, the patent only lasts half as long.

    Too many companies seem to be using their patents as blocking mechanisms to keep competitors out, or as a way to extort money from other, larger, firms.

    Chip H.

    1. Re:Patent reform idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your suggestion assumes that everyone who can invent something has the financial resources to make it. I've written several patents, but because of the capital investments that would be required to produce these products commercially, I cannot hope to set up a manufacturing plant for them. So I sell them.

      And, in case you haven't thought about it, patents *are* a blocking mechanism to keep competitors out. That's their purpose. Otherwise why spend the money and time developing a new idea or product if you don't have a barrier to entry to your competitors?

    2. Re:Patent reform idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or is only enforced for as long as you are actively producing a product based on it.

    3. Re:Patent reform idea by sabot99 · · Score: 1

      Some other countries have a system in which if you (the patenteed) do not practice your patented invention within a couple of years, your patent is subject to compulsory licensing. In other words, others can now practice your invention after paying a licensing fee, but you can't stop them.

  25. Great! by W0nk0 · · Score: 1

    Just as I received two 7920's, with a third on it's way, and placed a $3000 order for their Enterprise software. Strong the forces of irony are.

  26. NTP patents are DOA by WoodieR · · Score: 2, Interesting

    it's more like NTP's patents are DOA, and RIM doesn't owe them a plug nickel ...

    --
    Question Authority before IT questions You ...
  27. Some blackberry owners become slaves by jeanluc.bonnafoux · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yesterday evening, I have attended to a play in Paris. My neighbor could not wait for the end of the play or for the interval: he had to check his blackberry often... Some blackberry users become slaves. I hope for them that 'blackberry' will disappear...

    --
    le souvenir d'une certaine image n'est que le regret d'un certain instant (M.Proust)
    1. Re:Some blackberry owners become slaves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      am still waiting for bicycle outlawed after one ran over my foot yesterday. clearly governmnt not doing its job

  28. The New Business Model by DrWho520 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. Dream up and outlandish idea you have no clue how to implement and patent in obscure wording
    2. Go into coporate hybernation and wait until someone much smarter implements idea.
    3. Sue smarter company for all their hardwork and ingenuity.
    4. Profit!!!


    I hate parasites.

    --
    The cancel button is your friend. Do not hesitate to use it.
    1. Re:The New Business Model by alecks · · Score: 1

      Technically speaking, if you believe in the quantuum model and string theory, Isn't it feasable that while you thought of the idea to patent and sleep on, someone with enough technical/business background 'picked-up' your idea from our subconsious minds, and implemented it.
      Is it not fair then, that the originator of the idea should be compensated?

      hehe.

    2. Re:The New Business Model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think my head just exploded.

  29. .gov.ca by Locarius · · Score: 1

    I work for a very large Canadian Government department and I would say 9 out of 10 employees here have a Blackberry (supplied and paid for by the department). We are talking about very large numbers here. I assume things are similar in other departments. These devices are not going away anytime soon, at least in Canada.

    1. Re:.gov.ca by thecardinal · · Score: 1

      Similar things here, although I'm the european offices of an American company.

      We are rolling out (throughout europe) several thousand Blackberries amongst all management and the sales force.

      In the US, as far as I know, its running at 100% of managers (all levels) using the devices as well. Doubt those guys will hand them back; they love checking their game scores on a company supplied device.

  30. Sad Sad Sad by Rac3r5 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is a very very sad case.

    Why in the world is a company like NTP even allowed to exist. Why are ppl given patents before even coming up with a product.

    I think what NTP has done/is currently doing is very wrong. Why should a company like NTP that just dreams up ideas and does nothing to actually develop them being given patents? They do very little to foster innovation. They do very little to employ people. They pretty much do jack diddly squat.

    This is wrong in so many ways.
    There are 3 other parties that are also responsible for the BS. The patent office that actually gave them the patent (flawed patent system), the corrupt law firm representing the case, and the Judge who ruled on this case and cannot see right from wrong.

    1. Re:Sad Sad Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no. what's wrong is that RIM can even patent a stupid thing such as a tiny keyboard! since when can a patent be applied to sime just made smaller?
      and "push" email is nothing new! What moronic patent clerks allowed that? there are no innovations in any RIM products...

    2. Re:Sad Sad Sad by __int64 · · Score: 1

      These companies not only do very little to foster innovation, they hinder innovation! This is blatant patent abuse. They squat some non-implemented idea until someone implements it, rape the implementer (hindering progress), and then in some cases attempt to remove it from the marketplace entirely. This is blatant inappropriate use, a pure contradiction to everything 'the patent' stands for - and I don't understand why this practice is allowed to continue.

    3. Re:Sad Sad Sad by nilptr46 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Why should a company like NTP that just dreams up ideas and does nothing to actually develop them being given patents?

      For the record, the company was formed to defend the patents. Several posts seems to suggest that NTP is a company that patents vague ideas and waits for a successful company to pounce on.

      From http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,116441,0 0.asp/
      Tom Campana developed a wireless communications system for his pager company that he later patented, and the BlackBerry infringes upon that patent, said James Wallace, an attorney with Wiley Rein & Fielding LLP in Washington, D.C., representing NTP. NTP was incorporated to hold Campana's patents, and does not make any products or provide any services, he said.

      Oh, and BTW, in case you're thinking Tom is one greedy SOB, he's dead. http://news.com.com/Key+figure+in+BlackBerry+case+ dies/2100-1041_3-5238198.html/

      Don't think I'm defending NTP. I just want everyone to get the facts straight.

  31. Summary by 823723423 · · Score: 1

    [1]Email messaging device have reached an impasse, the two companies involved said Thursday, raising the possibility that the BlackBerry service could be banned from the United States market
    [2]
    In its filing Thursday, though, NTP said that if no settlement was reached, it would again ask for an injunction on the sale of BlackBerry pagers...

  32. Not true by pointyhairedmba · · Score: 1

    Q1 2005 stats

    PalmOne: 614,750 units shipped (from 834,591 same period last year). Market share 18% from 30%

    RIM: 711,000 units shipped (from 405,000 same period last yesr). Market share 20.8% from 14.8%.

    RIM subscribers at 3MM from 1MM 16 months ago.

    20% of RIM sales are from Europe

    1. Re:Not true by lastchance_000 · · Score: 1
      If you're getting you're numbers from this article, I hope you noted that it's only referring to the handheld market, and specifically excludes smartphones like the 650.

      This site has interesting numbers. It seems the Nokia smart devices outsold the others (combined) in Q12005, with a 50% market share.

    2. Re:Not true by pointyhairedmba · · Score: 1

      http://www.personaltechpipeline.com/162600033

      To follow up the reply to my post: This is the article I got the data from. From my read, Gartner defines "wireless data-centric" for these numbers. So the Treo 650 is included I beleive.
    3. Re:Not true by lastchance_000 · · Score: 1
      It's the same article, posted in different places. But regarding the Treo being included, let me quote:
      The change was not unexpected, given PalmOne's decision to focus on the nascent smart-phone market with its Treo device, Todd Kort, analyst for Gartner Inc. said.

      Further on in the article:

      Gartner defines a PDA as a data-centric wireless device. Smart phones, on the other hand, are voice centric, but also offer some data services.
  33. Do no evil... by luchaugh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm originally from Waterloo, Ontario, where RIM is located. They've grown at an incredible rate in recent years, but not in an "we'll eat your soul" kind of way. They've reinvested strongly in the community, and have donated a TON of cash to charity and other ventures. For example, the founder of RIM donated $100M to found The Perimeter Institute, a theoretical physics center where researchers and eggheads can basically sit around and think about cool stuff without worrying about budgetary or governmental pressures. A lot of what I see from RIM reminds me very much of Google. Become an industry leader, and STAY an industry leader for the right reasons. This story makes me somewhat sad, as the company suing them appears to have been "created" specifically for this reason, and they don't actually create anything that benefits anyone, except lawsuits that benefit themselves.
    Perimeter Institute can be found here:
    http://www.perimeterinstitute.com/index.php?lang=e n/
    If you're ever in Waterloo, I suggest you check it out. One of the coolest buildings I've ever seen.

    1. Re:Do no evil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is ass-licking bullshit.
      the bopsy twins didn't make good on the 100M$
      they only coughed up 30M$, the rest paid for by gov tax money. Funny those donations come only at tax time.

      eat your soul, you mean half of Waterloo isn't owned by RIM because of their bloat stock?

      Ya gotta be kidding - the PI building has got to be the biggest eyesore in the whole city!
      Oh did I mention PI is run by his best friend and cronies? - is that you Jimmy - did you post this?

    2. Re:Do no evil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a government law that prevented the allocation of all $100M at one time because the institute would become a private organization and couldn't receive additional government funding. The final payments have been completed over the last few years.

    3. Re:Do no evil... by Valacosa · · Score: 1

      RIM Founder Mike Lazaridis has also donated $33 Million CDN to University of Waterloo's Institute for Quantum Computing. And I think the perimeter building is cool.

      --
      "Live as if you'll die tomorrow." Ridiculous. You could die later today.
    4. Re:Do no evil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they only coughed up 30M$

      Which is about $29,999,999.99 more than you've coughed up for it. Shut the fuck up.

  34. Revenge by Bezben · · Score: 1

    Surely the best way to force a reform of the patent laws is to use them. Imagine this: All the pro open source / free software people start applying for as many patents as possible, covering any technology related matters, and the broader they are, the better. They then donate these patents to a new organisation whose goal is to look for infringments of these patents by large companies, and then get money from them. The money is used finance the organisation, and any left over is ploughed into various open source endeavours. If that doesn't force the big companies to buy new patent laws from the american government, I don't know what would.

    1. Re:Revenge by anopres · · Score: 1

      A single US/International patent combo can cost upwards of $40,000.00 dollars in filing fees and legal fees. Good luck getting this off the ground. Open source software has this bad habit of not generating a lot of revenue for the creators.

      --
      Strong Mad - 2008: "I PRESIDENT!"
  35. Treo killing Blackberry in defective returns by vjlen · · Score: 1

    All three of my clients with Treo 650s have had at least one return due to defective units. One is on his third.

    Blackberry? Same numbers. Except there's about 75 installed users who are still on their first units...

  36. Crackberry's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These stupid things became the "next shiny thing" all the managers had to have, and of course, when the service provider failed to enable BES, we had to "fix" them... I hate these things.

    With that, all I can say is:

    BWAhhhhhhhhh,
    hahahahahahahaahahahahhahahahahah ahaaha(imagine thousangs more)... damn lameness filter.

  37. Quoting the chairman and co-chief executive of RIM by rsax · · Score: 1
    "This is an enormous amount of money, one of the largest settlements in the history of any patent system," Mr. Balsillie said. "I'm at a loss to understand what in the world one would want beyond that."

    Umm, more money? And if you're the tinfoil hat type how about the fact that MS want to get their hands in the Blackberry cookie jar so bad, would they entice NTP, like SCO, to do something like this?

    I personally think it's just for more money. I mean this is coming from a company that doesn't manufacture any products, contributes nothing and just sues others due to the fact that they own patents. Surely an organization of such calibre wouldn't resort to something like this ;)

  38. BUT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What am I suppose to do with all these blackberrys, make jam?

  39. Must... quote... Scrubs! by OK+PC · · Score: 0

    Dr Cox:[to a teen who has stopped taking her epilepsy medication] If this continues, you will be dead. And I'm not talking about the "Oh my God, if I don't get invited to the prom, I'm going to die" type of dead- I'm talking dead dead. Is that clear enough for you? Because if it's not, I could of course text you on my Blackberry or my Blueberry or my Chuck Berry... although technically Chuck Berry is a blackberry... the point is you gotta stop wasing everyone's time and grow up. Is that clear to you sweetheart?

    --
    Did you get that thing I sent ya?
  40. Finally!!!!! YAY!!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone has finally discovered what that mysterious "???" step is.

    It's Lawsuit !!!!!

  41. the sidekick 2 by ohzero · · Score: 1

    or hiptop 2 - from danger, is a totally superior device anyway. predictive text is for suckers.

    --
    -- http://www.criticalassets.com
  42. Can you print from a Treo? by Voratus · · Score: 1

    Never used a treo, but can you print from it?

  43. I know what the problem is by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Funny

    They have a hard time attracting new employees. Most potential employees are too embarrassed to ask "How can I get a RIM job?"

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:I know what the problem is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know! Particularly when they conduct interviews through a glory hole in the men's room!

  44. This is what I'm talking about... by HomerNet · · Score: 1
    I have yet to find anyone who can point out to me precicely what the benefits of Blackberry are over some of the "older," more open technologies. As far as I can tell, it's an expensive 2-way alpha-numeric pager with an always on "chat" and the ability to check your email. Big whup, I can do all these on my Palm PDA and browse the web, play games, read e-books and fanfiction, etc. Frankly the whole Blackberry thing looks to me like a fine way to cheat PHBs out of their money.

    'Course, you know what they say about money and fools...

    --
    I have no tag line
    1. Re:This is what I'm talking about... by Zro+Point+Two · · Score: 1

      Why is it so hard for people to do some research? ok, here I go again.

      The BlackBerry will integrate totally with the corporate email solution. If you send an email from the BlackBerry and have it show up in your sent items in Outlook (and vice versa). Delete one message from the BlackBerry and it's deleted from the mailbox (and vice versa).

      Supports 3DES wireless encryption.

      Support for S/MIME.

      and browse the web, play games, read e-books and fanfiction, etc.

      If one can do it, chances are that the other can do it. Palms are multi purpose, BlackBerry's are secure. Palms pull email, BlackBerry's push email.

      'Course, you know what they say about posts and trolls...

      --
      Zro . two

      "I come from Canada...they say I'm slow....eh?"
  45. Push-Email needs licensing from NTP ... by BlackberryCool · · Score: 1

    This isn't just a case of NTP vs RIM, but NTP vs all push-email companies. Supposedly their patents bars companies from delivering push email without paying a license fee to NTP. NTP already has license agreements with Nokia, Good Technology, and are eyeing more ...

    Microsoft lawyers will be watching this case very carefully. Especially with their upcoming release of Mobile 5.0 with "Direct Push Email". I doubt Microsoft wants to pay license fees to NTP for every Exchange Server 2003 license they sell.

    NTP has a huge stake in this, it isnt just about $450 million, but future licensing revenue from Nokia, Good, and Microsoft.

  46. Well, lest nee how NTP does with the market by crovira · · Score: 1

    getting dumped on them. NTP is just a small patent-holding company in Arlington, Va.

    RIM has the hardware and the network.

    Let RIM put out an email and a static page on all their devices out there saying that they are being forced out by NTP.

    We'll see how long NTP can stand being in the palmtop communication device marketplace with nothing to show for it but their dick in their hand.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  47. Blackberry by standbypowerguy · · Score: 1

    Now maybe the PHBs at my company can find time to do some useful work, instead of forwarding messages from their Blackberrys all day long...

    --
    This isn't the sig you're looking for... Move along.
  48. Re:Well, lest nee how NTP does with the market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Without a settlement, and if the injunction is granted, neither company will have any U.S. revenue.

    NTP is just a small patent-holding company in Arlington, Va.

    RIM has the hardware and the network.

    RIM has to pay to maintain a staff and their network. NTP has to pay to maintain... oh yes, nothing.

    NTP can stay in the patent abuse game without any revenue a lot longer than RIM can afford to stay in the network game without revenue.