Slashdot Mirror


A Practical Guide to DIY LCD Projectors

Compu486 writes "Inventgeek.com has a new article entitled "A practical guide to DIY Home Projection". The guide covers the basic theory behind projection and provides a step by step guide for a "Practical" DIY LCD Projector. Although this topic has been covered before, the perspective they offer is refreshing."

217 comments

  1. Thats nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    In my day, we made our own movies using a light bulb and creative hand poses casting animal shaped shadows...

    1. Re:Thats nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You had a light bulb?! LUXURY!

      In *my* day, we had to wait til lightning struck a tree and set it on fire to get any sort of light.

      And when our branches burnt out, we had to go out of our caves to look for more sources of fire again.

    2. Re:Thats nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that the same technology that allows one to make a ghost ship using two Q-tips, a candle and a squirrel?

    3. Re:Thats nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't call what you're doing with your hand "casting animal shapes".

      *shudder*

    4. Re:Thats nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't call what you're doing with your hand "casting animal shapes"
      Sure it is- It is casting (a very small) American Zipper Snake as it enters a small hand shaped cave repeatadly....

    5. Re:Thats nothing by Mr_Matt · · Score: 3, Funny

      Heh...here's another joke, from TFA:

      Now I will say this on the note of the fabric store types: Not Geeks! These are the types of people that never get out and experience the world.

      Pot, kettle. Kettle, pot. Hey, you're black too!

      --


      But what does my opinion matter, I just vote here. It's not like I have any money or anything.
    6. Re:Thats nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather just pop on down to my local thrift shop and pick up a nice used big screen plasma unit for $50 or so. What? You mean your local thrift doesn't have 'em? Well, some thrift shops are better others I suppose.

    7. Re:Thats nothing by dspratomo · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I've actually lived in a remote village with little electricity for 1 month during my college years (part of the curicullum at that time), what's ironic is I'm in Electrical Engineering department.

      Anyway, the main public source of light is the moonlight. When the moon shine little children playing outside, and make some noises from wooden apparel esp. the one to grind rice, called 'lesung' (FYI this is Indonesia and our main meal is rice). And when there's no moon the sky is just lighted by thousands of stars, just like in the planetarium.
      I think live without computer is not as bad as I thought previously (before went to the village).

      Alas, most of the magic gone when electricity came in. Most of the children prefer to watch TV. I wonder how many customs like this lost all over the world.

      --
      Work like you don't need the money, love like you've never been hurt, and dance like you do when nobody's watching
  2. I wish.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish they could use real images instead of obvious fake ones

  3. Finally by mfloy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now I can finally watch my reality TV shows on a bigger screen. This is truely a fantastic day.

  4. The perspective they offer is refreshing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've found the perspective must be refreshing at 25ms or less to get adequate results.

  5. I'd rather by Evangelion · · Score: 4, Informative


    Go with LumenLab's plan, if I was to do this at all.

    And they have real pictures too, instead of faked images on thier site.

    1. Re:I'd rather by SpooForBrains · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Why do people wait for my modpoints to run out before they post crap like this?

      --
      "The dew has clearly fallen with a particularly sickening thud this morning"
    2. Re:I'd rather by towaz · · Score: 1

      I built my projector from lumenlabs a few months ago, have a nice 3 meter screen at 16ms response for playing counterstrike and films.

      Cost me about £300 ( benq 15" lcd was most expensive bit) to build, Its so bright and sharp I put my friends £3000 projector to shame.

      Took it outside during a bbq at night and projected on the back of my house with no problems either.. roughly 7 diag. meter screen from two white sheets :)

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Voltaire
    3. Re:I'd rather by passthecrackpipe · · Score: 1

      spamming on /.? thats brave....

      --
      People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.
    4. Re:I'd rather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you elaborate? Is lumenlab crap, or is their plan crap, or what? What would you recommend?

    5. Re:I'd rather by fishdan · · Score: 1

      If there plan was FREE maybe I'd go with it, but charging $20.00 for PLANS to build something is a little too much like those ads in the back of comic books for me.

      --
      Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm
    6. Re:I'd rather by SpooForBrains · · Score: 1

      It's a blatant sales pitch. The entire page is just a "whee, look what you can do with our wonderful document, if you just pay us $20! Woo!"

      --
      "The dew has clearly fallen with a particularly sickening thud this morning"
    7. Re:I'd rather by towaz · · Score: 1

      To be honest the $20 dollers is not for plans as such.. The forums are where all the information is. They are a lot more then one set on plans on them for you to choose.. folded light design for instance using a mirror, mini projectors 8" or huge (over 21") lcd screen plans.

      I don't regret paying as I got a cool projector, but it's upto you :)

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Voltaire
    8. Re:I'd rather by pseudorand · · Score: 1

      Does this mean you've bought from Lumenlabs? Do you know their products suck? These posts are great if they're truly independent opinions of how cool Lumenlabs products are. Since I haven't seen any post saying "I've used lumenlabs and it sucks," I'm inclined to believe the positive posts.

    9. Re:I'd rather by Marillion · · Score: 1

      Especially for someone with a four digit Slashdot ID.

      --
      This is a boring sig
    10. Re:I'd rather by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      Ya, for a "do it yourself article", it would have been nice if they took REAL pictures of the final output of their hack rather than faking the screen images.

      Are they purposefully trying to fool people into thinking it will even come close to the quality of a real front-projection system?

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    11. Re:I'd rather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tom's Hardware has the skinny on these types of $20 plans, telling how/if they work, and how you can do it yourself (without paying).

    12. Re:I'd rather by JaxGator75 · · Score: 1
      I'm inclined to believe that only suckers give $20 for a PDF that's probably floating around the web for free anyway...

      Seriously, though, I'd have to speak with someone who bought this and did it themselves before I even considered investing $20. If I had $20 to blow, I'd finally fork some over to Brahm...

      --
      Come and see the violence inherent in the system!
    13. Re:I'd rather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note that a) Lumenlab isn't being sold on ebay, b) that there is signifigant support available in thier forums (access being the primary reason you'd want to pay the $20), and c) there are a large number of success stories with the plans.

      Tom's attempt was about as rough as you can get -- throw an LCD panel onto an overhead, and (unsuccessfully) cool it enough to use for a long period. Can you imagine having that in your living room for your home theatre?

    14. Re:I'd rather by stoanhart · · Score: 1

      They actaully do reach that quality.

      I havent built mine yet, but I am gearing up to. Ive been browsing the site heavily, scetching, planning, thinking.

      Just browse their free section of the forums for a while. You will see it is as hardcore and geeky as any other enthusiast community. Plus there are tons and tons and tons of images posted by users, including side by sides with `real` projectors.

    15. Re:I'd rather by stoanhart · · Score: 1

      Try browsing their free section of the forum. The place is really top notch, and completely worth the money. A hardcore dedicated community, with tons of info.

      The money is really just to support the guy who runs this place for a living. And no, he doesnt just run a website. He goes through tons of effort, finding suppliers, doing large orders, and sourcing quality parts and lenses for the community at prices a fraction of their retail costs.

      this site, so to speak, is the real deal

    16. Re:I'd rather by Evangelion · · Score: 1

      Go nuts

      The main thing that the $20 buys you is access to the support community at the Lumenlab forums. In order to (successfully) complete a project like this, you're going to NEED advice.

      (Lumenlab also sells the various parts that they recommend in the guide)

    17. Re:I'd rather by PorkNutz · · Score: 0
      I bought Lumenlabs $20 "guide" even though I had already found it using ED2k.

      You don't just get the PDF for the $20, you get access to the technical forums where Ideas and designs are discussed in detail. Without buying the membership, you get no access to the forums that allow posting of blueprints and designs that include step bystep howtos with measurements and part numbers and purchase points.

      The moderators at lumenlabs keep the public portions of the forums preety clean of details like those. You can however look at the gallery and see for yourself what kind of picture quality is possible (It is VERY impressive - I built mine from a Kogi "15 I bought from ebay) The quality of the product is up to you since you build it yourself.

    18. Re:I'd rather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      He's referring to the story these comments are attached to.

    19. Re:I'd rather by pseudorand · · Score: 1
      See what I mean. The PDF probably is online for free somewhere, but the time it might take me to find it is worth more than the $20 it would take me to buy it (unless someone wants to post the free link here ;).

      And I'm still waiting for someone to tell me about a bad experience with Lumenlabs.

  6. Not a good field for DIY by Arthur+B. · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't really get why one would want DIY here... Having a video-projector, say for home-cinema sake or gaming is mostly about quality of the picture. Apart from the sake of learning I'd rather buy one. Oh, and not a LCD one, at least a DSP. Although laser projection tech has been around for some time now, I'm really surprised that it's not used. Although sounds like a feasible DIY project.

    --
    \u262D = \u5350
    1. Re:Not a good field for DIY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A "DSP" projector has some disadvantages compared to an LCD; it depends on what you're using it for. Home theater users should stick with the DLP.

      "Laser projector?" Dude, unless you're planning on doing a production of "Laser Metallica" at home, you might want to hold off on buying one. Did you hear about that from B1G-C1al15@bulk-offer.com?

    2. Re:Not a good field for DIY by Steve525 · · Score: 1

      I don't really get why one would want DIY here...

      Cost savings, and the fun of doing it, I guess.

      I've never seen one of these homebrew things in operation, but I share your doubts about the picture quality. Every overhead projector I've ever used has had pretty crappy geometry, and uneven illumination. They're also noisy and run pretty hot. (I know that's what the enclosure is for, but simultaneously getting rid of heat and noise is tricky).

      BTW, I think you mean DLP, no DSP.

    3. Re:Not a good field for DIY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, projectors were first used for presentations. Quality is a tad less important there.

    4. Re:Not a good field for DIY by Arthur+B. · · Score: 1

      Meant DLP not DSP... Laser projection is, in its principle much simpler than dlp or lcd. dlp needs millions of tiny mirrors, whereas laser only need a few. You have to achieve two things 1) dim the intensity according to the color (can be achieved by going through a polarized material through a variable angle, using a controlled mirror) 2) scanning the screen, rotation of small reflective device... imagine a mirror spiral on a cylinder

      --
      \u262D = \u5350
    5. Re:Not a good field for DIY by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I don't really get why one would want DIY here...

      No, what you don't understand is why someone would want an LCD projector. Whether it's homebrew or commercial, the picture quality will be basically the same. In fact, because of the larger form-factor of most home-brew projectors, you have the possibility of using a much, much higher-res LCD panel for your projector.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:Not a good field for DIY by MythMoth · · Score: 2, Informative

      Although laser projection tech has been around for some time now, I'm really surprised that it's not used.

      Last time I looked into it green lasers were prohibitively expensive and blue lasers were completely untenably expensive.

      --
      --- These are not words: wierd, genious, rediculous
    7. Re:Not a good field for DIY by kris_lang · · Score: 1

      ah yes, but getting a good quality blue laser to use for the projection will not only cost you a lot but also require quite a bit more cooling than you might think...

    8. Re:Not a good field for DIY by kris_lang · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yup, and blue lasers need quite a bit of cooling and you need a lot of power for them.

      LaserPower (now defunct) used to make a laser projection display with microlasers. And there's a company that projects displays directly onto the retina (microvision) with microlaser and diode-laser sources. (i don't know that I'd want to point even a low power laser device INTO my eye...

      and then there's the problem with the lack of persistence for viewing the images.

    9. Re:Not a good field for DIY by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      I don't really get why one would want DIY here... Having a video-projector, say for home-cinema sake or gaming is mostly about quality of the picture.

      When I first went to university in the early-mid 1990s, they used the *same* method to project a computer display; a transparent LCD device (designed for the purpose) placed on an OHP.

      It was *horrible*. The OHPs gave (just about) passable performance under most conditions when used for their intended purpose. However, the optics were no better than they needed to be to project text legibly; which is another way of saying they were crap (*especially* in the corners; colour-fringing and lack of focus ahoy...). More importantly, the display was never particularly bright.

      And unfortunately, LCDs filter out a lot of light; firstly to convert the "100% RGB" white source to red, green or blue light (discarding at least 2/3 of the light), then *again* in order to reduce the "100%" Red (or green or blue) to the appropriate level for that pixel.

      The resultant display was extremely dim, and only at all usable when the curtains were drawn. Even then it was poor; and that was when it was used for Powerpoint slides, not DVDs (especially since DVDs weren't even out then... :)).

      Perhaps the guy is using a very bright bulb, and perhaps dealing with light pollution inside the case improves things. However, as most of the problems I described above were down to the *external* light pollution relative to the low brightness of the projected image, I suspect the former.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    10. Re:Not a good field for DIY by JohnFluxx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You also need a quite high powered laser. I've got a 30mW green, and projecting that over 1m^2 once you have all the optics in, is barely visible in darkness.
      (I do holography)

    11. Re:Not a good field for DIY by Arthur+B. · · Score: 1

      Yep but it scans the screen, it doesn't cover it all at once.

      --
      \u262D = \u5350
    12. Re:Not a good field for DIY by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      But imagine if someone did develop a laser projector. The resolution would only be limited by the control system (mirrors, whatever) for the laser. You could have a near-infinite resolution system by simply creating finer and finer controls, rather than trying to pack more mirrors or more pixels onto a smaller and smaller chip. Imagine a 16000 x 9000 resolution, 20 foot diagonal screen. That would be awesome. Now you just need to find some source material at that resolution... a room full of super computers rendering quake should do fine, heh.

      As well, since you are not working with a planar source surface (ie the LCD panel or DLP chip in a projector), you could mount the laser source at the focus of a semi-circle and get a panoramic display. The calculations would be straightforward, just a series of transform matrices.

      Yeh, that would be cool.

    13. Re:Not a good field for DIY by Hast · · Score: 1

      I think the biggest thing with this isn't that you can make your own projector for a home theatre system (most people would probably be better off getting a designed system for that) but it does open up interesting other DIY projects.

      A few weeks back was the project where 2 projectors + cameras were turned into a realtime 2D fighter (it was called "kick ass kung fu" or something like that). Now if you have to pay $1500 per projector something like that is quite hard to afford, but if you "roll your own" it's possible.

      This can make all kinds of other nerat projects possible because you have an affordable way of making multiple projector displays.

    14. Re:Not a good field for DIY by Scott+Byer · · Score: 2, Informative
      Although laser projection tech has been around for some time now, I'm really surprised that it's not used.

      Laser projection is just getting started out at the very high end of the market (theater projection).

      Sony is currently demoing their Laser Theatre Dream Display at the World Expo in Aichi, Japan. What they are showing is actually three displays with a slight overlap (which actually works reasonably well except for blacks). Each display consists of many red diode lasers, blue diode lasers, and green lasers piped through fiber through a 1-dimensional MEMS light shutter which is scanned across the display. The current vertical resolution is 1k, but by keeping the shutter 1-dimensional, it's easy to see how the resolution can quickly be pumped up. Horizontal resolution is controlled by the light gate speed and scanning speed. The displays are absolutely gorgeous - they blow current digital theatre projectors away. Color gamut is outstanding, no visible scanlines, no visible flicker, even when looking off to the side. I can't wait to be able to start watching movies this way - it'll be the thing that finally gets me back into theatres regularly.

      Of course, it will be a while before you can have something like this in your house, much less as a DIY project. Maybe by then someone will have figured out how to get a solid state green laser going.

      --
      > cat ~/.signature | grep -v bullshit

      >

    15. Re:Not a good field for DIY by trentblase · · Score: 1

      Ha! Saying "the resolution would only be limited by the control system" is not very different from saying that the resolution of DLP is "only limited by the number of mirrors you can put on a chip". I guess if you had such a system, you could upgrade JUST the control system w/o replacing the lasers.

    16. Re:Not a good field for DIY by takev · · Score: 1

      Or go the really cool route using color modulating crystals.

      I don't have a link, but there is a company that makes light modulators. You point the laser trough this gizmo, use electronics to tell the gizmo what color it should be modulated to. Now add a single moving mirror, and some electronics to scan lines on the screen (or whatever form you like).

    17. Re:Not a good field for DIY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > When I first went to university in the early-mid 1990s

      Did they also use a 486?

      You might find LCDs have improved since then.

      There's also this invention called "The Intarweb"...

    18. Re:Not a good field for DIY by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      What I'd like to see someone hack, is to take 3 inexpensive DLP projectors, modify them so each only outputs a single primary colour (r/g/b), then combine the light from each to form a single projection image.

      Most triple-DLP projectors are in the $20k+ range, so it would be nice to see if someone could hack-up something similar with 3 projectors in the $1,500 range.

      (of course, just having them manufacture them cheaper would be nice too).

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    19. Re:Not a good field for DIY by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      hmm, but the total energy reaching your eyes per second is the same. Does it make much difference?

    20. Re:Not a good field for DIY by nostriluu · · Score: 1


      In my research in low-medium end projectors (up to about $4000), LCD is better than DLP (which is what I assume you mean by "DSP.") Sharper, brighter, better colour, and no danger of the "rainbow effect" which plagues DLP projects and distracts or even give viewers headaches.

      DLP still wins in contrast, but you'll rarely notice the difference and newer LCDs are getting pretty good (2000:1 for the AE700U). The only drawback of LCD I've seen is the greater likelihood of dead pixels.

    21. Re:Not a good field for DIY by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Did they also use a 486? You might find LCDs have improved since then.

      Very possibly, but the laws of physics likely haven't.

      Now, unless you can demonstrate that LCDs have undergone a fundamental change in design (not quality) since then, they're still going to have to block the light twice. Slap that on top of a not-particularly-bright OHP and you're still going to end up with something fairly dim.

      Why on earth do you think projectors require such intense (and expensive) bulbs?

      There's also this invention called "The Intarweb"...

      Yep... I had a web-page back then. Your point being?

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    22. Re:Not a good field for DIY by OrbNobz · · Score: 1

      "I've got a 30mW green...barely visible in darkness."

      Just capitalize the 'm'. ;D
      Of course, I'm sure your fire insurance doesn't cover this...

      - OrbNobz
      All my funny posts are invariably rated as 'unfunny'. Go fig.

    23. Re:Not a good field for DIY by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think it would be quite different.

      Because in a laser system you would have 3 lasers scanning to produce each pixel. So the pixel size would only be limited by the width of the laser beam. And you would have a single high speed mirror for each laser. So, the limit on resolution would be how fast the mirror can turn between projecting 2 discrete pixels. The mirrors could be whatever size you want, 1" x 1" ... whatever since their size does not directly affect the resolution (indirectly their weight might affect the control ability which would in turn affect the resolution).

      Whereas, for DLP more mirrors of the same size on a single chip increases the probability of a failed chip. And, decreasing the size of the mirrors to fit more on a single chip requires more development, which increases the probability of a failed chip (until some point in time since probability of failure usually decreases with time for developing technologies).

    24. Re:Not a good field for DIY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it does make a difference if you streak a laser beam across the screen a la CRT vs. just using it as a background light a la LCD.
      It has something to do with the way our eyes work.
      Not a biology grad here, but I do know that 10 Hz light pulses with light duration of 50 ms look exactly the same as those with duration of 5 ms despite the energy that hits your eye being 10 times less.

    25. Re:Not a good field for DIY by trentblase · · Score: 1

      See, you're doing it again. "pixel size would only be limited by the width of the laser beam"... mirrors would have to be very high quality (the last time I was looking at first surface mirrors, they were expensive). They would have to be perfectly weighted to spin quickly without too much vibration. These are non-trivial problems. Either way, DLP or lasers, you are going to have to put a lot into development. Maybe I misunderstood you, but I got the impression you thought it would be easy to build the laser control system.

    26. Re:Not a good field for DIY by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      Not easy, just simpler than finding ways to pack more mirrors in a tinier surface with less failures. I'm just speculating though, I have no data to back myself up.

  7. Nice, but... by suitepotato · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Although this topic has been covered before, the perspective they offer is refreshing.

    Why? Does it give me a free beer with it?

    Cursory overview leaves me unimpressed. It seems like a rehash of prior projects but using simpler and less expensive parts. Result: a projector that has less lifespan than a low-end projector for a bit more money and no warranty.

    I'd rather wait a little while longer and wait till the technology matures a bit more. If I come into some money I can spend freely on a projector, I'll buy one that can do at least 1024x768 PC input and make sure to buy spare projector parts with it.

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
    1. Re:Nice, but... by fshalor · · Score: 1

      I think this was mostly just a protest to the delming going on in advertized specs by the main players in this field. (Shame on you you big manufacuteres you! You should know better!)

      Anyways, it'll get people thinking a little, and let them get a bit more edumacated (W.) about what these things can actually do.

      I'll stick to my Sharp for work. Love the thing. It nearly burns the ceiling tiles when it kicks off, but looks ultra sweet.

      --
      -=fshalor ::this post not spellchecked. move along::
    2. Re:Nice, but... by trentblase · · Score: 1
      Me too!

      But seriously, the spelling is horrendous. The guy couldn't even be bothered to spellcheck the document -- what kind of quality do you think this projector will have?

    3. Re:Nice, but... by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 1

      If you don't like DIY anything, then this is pointless: but go to DIYAudio and browse through the "Moving Image" section. The DIY LCD projector is becoming very mature and you can select different price and quality options to get price range from almost nothing to $1000. The average projector costs about $300-$400 and requires a few days worth of building. The kicker is bulb price. Typical bulbs used in DIY projectors will last several years, and cost only $40 to replace. As for quality, here's what my first cardboard-and-duct-tape mockup was able to achieve: projected image. And this is FAR behind what the good DIY'ers are getting.

  8. DIY Digital Projection by LegendOfLink · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nah, my idea is better. Re-wire a retina scanner to output a DVD stream, and then you've got the BIGGEST picture of them all.

    Although I did see Matrix 3 in the IMAX, and it was a little scary to see Morpheus's face. I mean, the dude had like 2-foot pores!

    1. Re:DIY Digital Projection by dreadknought · · Score: 1

      So what exactly is a "Digital Video Disc stream" and how do you output it onto your retina?

      --
      What you reap is what you sow
    2. Re:DIY Digital Projection by pthor1231 · · Score: 1

      don't you mean Digital Versatile Disc? Seeing as you can put more than just video on a dvd.

  9. Hmm? by Sweetdelight · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Hmm? by Peter+Desnoyers · · Score: 1

      The Tom's hardware project is a true cheap projector, based on a 15" LCD monitor. The projection panel that these other folks use cost an arm and a leg when it was new, and the supply of cheap used ones on EBay can't be very big.

  10. Re:Argh! Enough already by nitio · · Score: 3, Funny

    well... you could connect your notebook that is on the crappy ugly shelf to the ugly loud useless rack and then project all your porn in your new projector.

    --
    http://stoploudness.org/
  11. Faster & about the same price by jurt1235 · · Score: 1

    1. Take an old overhead projector, gives you the light & the focus part at once.
    2. Strip LCD screen (takes about 20 minutes if you do it carefully and want to be able to reassemble it later).
    3. Put the lcd without backlight on the projector, and you are done.

    Yes, it is carppy mod day!

    --

    My wife's sketchblog Blob[p]: Gastrono-me
    1. Re:Faster & about the same price by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1

      Put the lcd without backlight on the projector, and you are done.

      Just remember to put a spacer in between the LCD and the projecor, with a fan pushing air between the two, or you will scorch your LCD panel.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    2. Re:Faster & about the same price by sprag · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "carppy mod day"? I think carp would look cooler with an extra tail. And maybe a goatee.

    3. Re:Faster & about the same price by jurt1235 · · Score: 1

      So carppy that I write crappy wrong, and just refuse to use the preview option

      --

      My wife's sketchblog Blob[p]: Gastrono-me
    4. Re:Faster & about the same price by jurt1235 · · Score: 1

      Hum, there is a good fan already cooling the overhead projector by itself. It needs to else the standard overhead sheet (the ones you write on during the presentation) get to hot to use in a decent way. The panel is thicker ofcourse, and might isolate the glass projector plate too much.

      One way to find out for sure: Try it (-:

      --

      My wife's sketchblog Blob[p]: Gastrono-me
    5. Re:Faster & about the same price by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      Not to mention add fans under the LCD screen as it will overheat.

      This is the problem with LCD, it degrades over time. DLP is superior, it's just at the low end DLP has its quirks (single chip rainbow effect).

    6. Re:Faster & about the same price by kenwood720 · · Score: 1

      I was surprised to find out how many people actually misspell the word crappy. Google Carppy. 1800 apparently.

  12. Dear Slashot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Dear Slashdot;

    I'm sorry I haven't wrote earlier, or made an account for that matter. I've been looking at you from afar for all these years, reading your posts, laughing at the good times, cringing at the bad. We've been through the dot-com, the dot-bomb, together.

    Sometimes our relationship seems to go in circles, but you come back and make it better. Today though, I'm leaving you. Oh sure, maybe I'll visit, but it won't be the same. I just can't forgive you for this; a shelf, a case mod, and another LCD DIY. It's been nice, take care.

  13. Perfect timing! by FrontalLobe · · Score: 1

    Wow, this is great. We're looking at renting a projector for my brothers wedding coming up, but the cost is pretty high. We have access to a screen, and I'm pretty sure an overhead. If I can get my hands on a cheap LCD projector, that'll cut our costs by at least 400%. Wouldnt bother with all the casing and such. Plus I get to keep the thing =D

    Although I'm not sure I'd want to use something so kludgy for a once in a lifetime event...

    --
    -FL
    1. Re:Perfect timing! by Living+WTF · · Score: 5, Funny

      > that'll cut our costs by at least 400%

      Your calculator was a DIY project too, wasn't it?

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
    2. Re:Perfect timing! by FrontalLobe · · Score: 1

      Nope... that would be my brain... dang early morning slashdot posting...

      --
      -FL
  14. DIY day? by Lxy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is today's Slashdot being brought to us by the DIY network or something?

    Build a rack!
    Build a shelf!
    Build an LCD!

    I admire the geek who homebrews hardware, but this is getting rediculous.

    --

    There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
    :wq
    1. Re:DIY day? by nizcolas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Except in the article you don't build the lcd, and the housing is optional.

      However I must admit that I'm more inclined to do this than the version where you tear the lcd apart. I talked to our hardware guy at work and asked him if he'd feel comfortable disassembling and lcd for a project like this. His response was something like, "as long as it wasn't mine."

      --
      If you get an error, type "OVERRIDE" or "SECURITY OVERRIDE" and then try the optimize command again.
    2. Re:DIY day? by 3.14159265 · · Score: 1

      Rediculous is absolutely ridiculous...!

    3. Re:DIY day? by V_Pundit · · Score: 1

      Hey! I was about to try posting a story about how to build your own rudimentary keyboard. It's completely configurable to your own personal tastes and can be done with nothing more than a few small wires, a bunch of springs and some small stones. Talk about portable, whenever you want to take it places you can just sweep it all into a bag and set it up again when you get where you're going.

      --
      that's how I see it anyway . . .
  15. Paint your own screen by Drog · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I've been reading up on this recently as I'm planning to build myself a home theatre in my basement this summer. Rather than buying or building a screen, I'm simply going to paint it onto my wall using a new type of paint called "Screen Goo" (I read a review of it here). Supposedly, it gives excellent results.

    As for the projector, I don't want to build this thing myself, I'm willing to spend the bucks. So I'll likely go for the Panasonic PT-AE700U, which I've seen reviewed here.

    So that leaves me wondering what sort of PC or hi-def receiver to buy to power this thing, so that I can use cable, satellite, game console, DVD, PVR and the PC.

    Any advice would be most appreciated.

    --

    Looking for political forums? Check out "The World Forum".

    1. Re:Paint your own screen by xENoLocO · · Score: 1

      Not to nitpick... but why the hell is there a golfer on the top right of their website?

      --
      "The need to build the internet comes from something inside us, something programmed... something we can't resist."
    2. Re:Paint your own screen by calibanDNS · · Score: 1

      Off topic, and not quite what you asked for, but if you haven't settled on a remote control for your setup yet, I just picked up Logitech's Harmony 880 and it is fantastic. I know I sound like a commercial (and no, I'm not affiliated with Logitech), but the Harmony is really the best thing I've found on the market for controlling a high-end system. There are LCD-only remotes that allow you to customize the button layout more than the Harmony, but I found that having to hunt for a button everytime I needed to press it is not as easy as finding most of the buttons by feel. The price is high (US $250), but other model Harmony remotes are cheaper if your budget is tight. The list of devices that it can control is impressive (create a test login at Logitech's Harmony site to see if the components you have/are getting are already supported) and their customer service has been excellent so far. Be sure to check out the forums at Remote Central for discussion on the Harmony and other high-end remotes. And trust me, you won't be truly happy with your system until you can easily control it the way that you want.

    3. Re:Paint your own screen by The-Bus · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, you will probably want to invest in a good DVD player. The decoding between players can have a big difference on image quality. I am not a videophile, but in my experience it's not so much the quality during slow, colorful scenes, but during very rapid sequences where you might see issues with playback. The Home Theater Forum is always a great start (they have a very nice moderated DIY section), and I am looking into possibly getting an Oppo Digital DVD which has been extremely well rated. As a plus, places like HK Flix sell it with updated firmware (so you can switch regions easily on the fly), although I've seen it for $50 less on Froogle.

      As far as receivers, I can give you my analysis and feedback as a regular consumer (I wouldn't even call myself a "prosumer") of home theatre electronics. You definitely would do well in investing in a good receiver with as many inputs as possible, and don't get them from Circuit City / Best Buy / Fry's as they are usually $100 more than what you can find online. In reality, you will probably not need more than 3 or 4 component inputs (DVD + HDTV + Console + Other). Depending on the # of inputs on your TV/projector, this should put you in the $300-$500 range for receivers. Look for wattage ratings and buy from a well-known company (say, Harman-Kardon, Denon, Onkyo, Sony, Yamaha).

      Once everything is set up, get a calibration DVD like Digital Video Essentials or Avia to tweak your settings. It can make a noticeable difference.

      You don't need Monster Cables. If you have a friend at a store who can get you the discount (retailer markup is at least 100%), then they're fine. But you don't need to spend $300 on cables. Spend that money on better equipment.

      Just do your research. It's possible that over the next few months older models will be discontinued and be heavily discounted. That can always save you some cash.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    4. Re:Paint your own screen by Tamugin · · Score: 1

      I built my screen, and in researching how to do it I looked at Screen Goo. Nice product, however you'll have a hell of a time getting a nice even and run-free coating on your substrate. If you thin it and use a nice sprayer you should be ok.

      I however, opted for the even cheaper method of Plas-Tex. I believe it is made by Parkland and is initially indended as wall covering in wet areas; public restrooms and such. The nice thing is that it has a gain of almost 1.0 and doesn't hotspot at all. I picked up a 4'x8' sheet at the local hardware store for $13. I built a wood frame and secured the plas-tex to it like a painting canvas. Some black material for masking and I have a great screen that is rigid and flat.

      http://www.parklandplastics.com/polywall.shtml It looks really great with my Marquee 8501 throwing light onto it.

      --
      Chris
    5. Re:Paint your own screen by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 1

      You may want to read this for your screen first:

      http://www.hometheaterforum.com/htforum/showthread .php?s=&threadid=224307

      Less expensive than buying the screen paint, and from the sounds of it, both more effective and a nicer looking finished solution on your wall.

      --
      Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
    6. Re:Paint your own screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The PT-AE700U is pretty good... I went with its competion Sanyo Z-series.

      Flat light gray paint works good instead of a screen or the magic goo paint. You should get plenty of light comming for the projector so the gery adds to contrast and black levels.

      Denon 1910 is $200 DVD player and is a really inexpensive but great upscaler to 720p..need to use DVI cables

      Very pleased with my setup -

    7. Re:Paint your own screen by leon.gandalf · · Score: 0

      You could alway go with a DLP projector. It has VGA and Component input.
      So it will work with HiDef Cable, Sat, PS, and the DVD is built in. Plus it has gotten a few good
      reviews.

    8. Re:Paint your own screen by Timtimes · · Score: 1

      Behr UPW (Ultra Pure White) straight to the wall will work quite nicely. I too used to think you needed a fancy screen until I bought my Benq 6200 last fall. I haven't even painted the wall WHITE yet. I'm projecting on bumpy off yellow wallpaper and IT ROCKS. I think the whole screen thing is a holdover from when people only had front projection CRT's. They were way too dim without a screen. Get an Infocus or Benq (or probably any other medium grade DLP) and you'll be so freakin' happy you won't believe it !!! Best forum for audio/video I've found is avsforum.com You'll find an entire thread on DIY screens. Plenty of folks who've actually done or are doing what you plan on. Input on everything from best projectors to best popcorn machines (I kid you not) Enjoy.

      --
      This ain't no upwardly mobile freeway This is the road to hell
    9. Re:Paint your own screen by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Good advice. Here's my further thoughts on it...

      Look for wattage ratings and buy from a well-known company

      Wattage can be misleading though, there are three different ways of listing the power, and each is 2x the previous one. Just make sure all five channels are the same wattage, and buy the same set of speakers for them all.

      Also, different amps sound different, and none of them are "correct". Maybe not so important for movies, but if you plan to use the same setup for music, you should try and arrange a demo of your shortlist. Take along some CDs with you.

      Once everything is set up, get a calibration DVD like Digital Video Essentials or Avia to tweak your settings. It can make a noticeable difference.

      It will make a noticable difference, but some folk don't like the "correct" settings. For years, the TV makers have been setting the default contrast way too high, to make the set look more attractive in the show room. Ever seen a game with a brightness calibration screen and thought it was too dark? That's it. I've got mine turned up "a little" from the correct setting.

      Also, be aware that if you are using component video, a few of the calibrations won't matter e.g. tint. We don't even have that control on our UK TVs, don't need it! ;-)

      You don't need Monster Cables.

      Agreed, but also don't use the cheapest. A local HiFi mag here compares using the free cables to drinking champagne out of a polystyrene cup! Get a "decent" set of cables for the main stuff at the very least. If you have to have a fairly long run to the projector, it might be wise to use decent cable for that.

    10. Re:Paint your own screen by VectorSC · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't use screen gooh. There is a Behr paint called "Silverscreen" that supposidly works very well. As for recievers, you should look at marantz.com. Their low end recievers kick almost as much tail as their high end ones do. I like them more than their next competitors, Harman Kardon and Pioneer. They are an old school name and have always made quailty stuff. I personally have an Infocus X1 that I love dearly. It's a legend in the industry, and X series projectors are still very economical. I would buy one and upgrade later if you felt the need (I didn't...and won't until the bulb blows at 4000 hours). By that time (in 3-4 years), HDTV DLP projectors will be as economical as the X series is today.

    11. Re:Paint your own screen by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1

      Er? Peak Peak-to-Peak: 2xPeak RMS: 0.707xPeak Unless you're talking about the misterious PMPO, there isn't a third measure that doubles the previous

      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
  16. Call me when by amcdiarmid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My wife will accept one in the living room.

    Otherwise this is just another "Overhead projectors with LCD panels make big ugly projectors that you cannot use anywhere but a darkened room" story.

    1. Re:Call me when by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Lol, you can totally make a nicer housing for it. And if you save 1000 dollars or so, why not?

    2. Re:Call me when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://store.yahoo.com/refurbelectronics/lp240-rb. html
      sxga & $600

      You are saving perhaps $400-500 max. Not including the time to build. I'd rather watch a movie or three to take up the slack.

  17. Hmmmm by Phurd+Phlegm · · Score: 5, Funny
    I read one page--the one on "Theroy." I find it distracting when someone doesn't bother with even elementary proofreading. If the content is interesting enough, I can overlook it, but this didn't seem all that novel. Just so there'd be some discussion, I made a quick list of the first errors that sprang out at me in the "Theroy" page. Doesn't everyone know some pedantic jerk that will edit their stuff for them?

    1. principals : principles
    2. cheep : cheap
    3. cellulous : celluloid?
    4. threw : through
    5. LCD's : LCDs
    6. Simi-gloss : semi-gloss
    7. portal : portable
    8. Walmount : wall-mount
    9. theroy : theory
    10. togeather : together
    11. its : it's
    12. . : ?

      I anxiously await the first person to point out a spelling or usage error in my post--it's traditional.

    1. Re:Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      theroy : theory

    2. Re:Hmmmm by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 2, Funny

      I anxiously await the first person to point out a spelling or usage error in my post--it's traditional.

      Dude! You misspelt "fuc... oh, forget it.

      ;-)

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    3. Re:Hmmmm by timster · · Score: 1

      Well, I had a college professor tell me that the use of the dash should be carefully constrained, lest it lose its force through overuse. Twice in a short post would certainly be over her limits.

      Also, isn't a jerk a person? So should it be "a pedantic jerk who"?

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    4. Re:Hmmmm by hhghghghh · · Score: 1

      I anxiously await the first person to point out a spelling or usage error in my post--it's traditional.

      Very well. The comma after "If the content is interesting enough" is superfluous. Happy now, punk?

    5. Re:Hmmmm by argStyopa · · Score: 0

      Theroy is correctly spelled THEORY.

      (It's equally traditional to not RTFM)

      --
      -Styopa
    6. Re:Hmmmm by Noel+Coward · · Score: 0

      > I read one page--the one on "Theroy."

      Should at least be:
      I read one page--the one on "Theroy".

      --
      . implicit all IIRC IM*HO £0.02 YM?V ;-) ...
    7. Re:Hmmmm by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      I find it distracting when someone doesn't bother with even elementary proofreading.

      This would read better as:

      I find it distracting when someone doesn't even bother with elementary proofreading.

      Otherwise you may be referring to 'even elementary proofreading' which does not happen to be bothered with. It could also read:

      I find it distracting when someone doesn't bother with even the most elementary of proofreading.

      This gives that sort of sophisticated, British-accent sort of grammar that we all know and love so much.

    8. Re:Hmmmm by tabrnaker · · Score: 1
      If it really bothers you, then why don't you stop bitching and help them out?

      Or are you only capable of bitching?

    9. Re:Hmmmm by sharkey · · Score: 3, Funny
      Simi-gloss : semi-gloss

      Actually, Simi-gloss is a brand name. Each can comes with its own painter-monkey.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    10. Re:Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Negative. The quotes surround the other punctuation, as he had originally written.

    11. Re:Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very well. The comma after "If the content is interesting enough" is superfluous. Happy now, punk?

      It is not superfluous. It belongs there. If you think it doesn't, then you are wrong.

    12. Re:Hmmmm by Daemon69 · · Score: 1

      I anxiously await the first person to point out a spelling or usage error in my post--it's traditional.

      Walmount: Wal*Mart. It is DIY after all...

    13. Re:Hmmmm by blakjack · · Score: 1


      Doesn't everyone know some pedantic jerk that will edit their stuff for them?

      Should read...
      Doesn't everyone know some pedantic jerk who will edit their stuff for them.
      Or it actually might be whom.
    14. Re:Hmmmm by jackcarter · · Score: 1

      Yay, you're wrong on both of those. "That" can refer to people or things; it would only have been wrong had he used "which." Also, "who" is correct.

      I am surprised that nobody has found the incorrect usage of "them." In this case it should be "him," or if you want to be politically correct, "him/her."

  18. spend the same on a widescreen CRT but sit closer by hilaryduff · · Score: 2, Insightful

    a 1024x768 screen is going to look pretty damn pixelated blown up to 100" unless you sit quite a way back!

  19. It's Not Worth It by dafz1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The author of the article keeps saying it's better to DIY than spend $5K on a commercial model. However, you can get a decent projector for $800(or less if you buy a refurb non-current model). Plus, the picture quality is a lot better(supports 480i, 480p, 720p, and 1080i), and is in an appealing form factor.

    The other question is how noisy is the overhead projector? Remembering back to elementary school, those things were pretty loud.

    1. Re:It's Not Worth It by Drog · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I agree. There's no way I'd want an ugly, noisy, low-res projector like that in my living room.

      --

      Looking for political forums? Check out "The World Forum".

    2. Re:It's Not Worth It by og_sh0x · · Score: 1

      For $600 you can build a 1024x768 projector with DVI input and brightness equivalent to a 1500 lumen projector. The bulbs cost $40 to replace and last 18,000 hours. Parts are cheap and interchangable, should something go wrong (heat is the major issue.)

      Your $800 refurb projector will be an 800x600 with no DVI support and $300 bulb replacements twice a year. Good luck repairing it cheaply if something else breaks.

    3. Re:It's Not Worth It by jason718 · · Score: 1

      I agree - $1K will get you (from a well known warehouse store) a brand new fantastic DLP projector that is great for movies and gaming. They even throw in a 72" 16:9 screen as well.

    4. Re:It's Not Worth It by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Plus, the picture quality is a lot better(supports 480i, 480p, 720p, and 1080i), and is in an appealing form factor.

      Point me to an $800 projector that can handle 1080i (1920x1080).

      The other question is how noisy is the overhead projector?

      It's easy to replace the fan.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:It's Not Worth It by LetterJ · · Score: 1

      Many of the $300 bulbs are now rated for 4000 hours. Just how much are you watching in a day?

    6. Re:It's Not Worth It by og_sh0x · · Score: 1

      They're rated for 4000 hours often times in "economy" mode where you're watching a much dimmer screen. Also, the bulbs carry a 90 day warranty only. They can and will sometimes burn out after only a couple hundred hours of use, especially if the projector is often transported. I know at work I've seen a bulb implode after as little as 30 hours of use. It's a dirty little secret of the cheap, miniature projectors. Much like the dirty little secret of the cheap inkjet printers. It's practically a loss leader.

    7. Re:It's Not Worth It by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      You're nuts right? Or you've never used an overhead projector. There's a reason they usually have a dedicated place for a replacement lamp - the lamps don't last long. I quote:

      In a test done by GTE/Sylvania on 10 ENX lamps, the range of life was 34.3 hours to 76 hours. The average lamp life for this batch was 68.7 hours, higher than the published average of 65 hours. However, the lamp that lasted only 34.3 hours is not considered to be defective.

      Okay, so those lamps will run you $6/ea in quantity. I'll give you $6/70 hours. That's $0.08/hr. More like $0.16/hr if you get a short one, that is still within spec. Modern projectors will get you 2000-4000 hours *to half brigtness*, not necessarily failure, for $300. At the worst case, that's $.15/hr, and the best case $0.075/hr. And the number of movies interrupted by a lamp change is 1/50th of that with an overhead.

      Next, that 1500 lumen projector is going to put out about 300-400 from the last optic, if you're lucky, once you put an LCD panel on it.

      Finally, even the OP admitted that the thing was LOUD due to fan noise. Many HT projectors - even the cheap ones, as so quiet that you can't hear them except in silent passages of the film (sub-35dB).

      If you're watching mostly DVDs, or don't "need" HD resolution, the following NEW, 16:9 DLP with SCREEN could be had for $900 after rebate this month. From FatWallet, on the InFocus 4805 dedicated HT projector:


      The deal is available at Circuit City until Monday July 4th.

      The projector is $1099.99+ tax...

      Use the new 10% off CC coupon code DJA3QLGADC

      Total should be 989.99 +Tax

      Circuit City qualify's for the $100 rebate as well as the 76" Wall Mount Screen from Infocus.

      (Quick Edit: It looks like the screen mail in rebate is only valid until 7/2 - so if you want it you have to pull the trigger fast hehe)

      Total with the rebate, screen and 10% off would be $889.99 + tax


      These deals happen all the time.

      I'd say your $600 is a waste of money, when you can just turn a couple extra tricks and get the real thing.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    8. Re:It's Not Worth It by og_sh0x · · Score: 1

      Oh, sorry I need to clarify. The $600 I'm talking about is not using an overhead projector with the standard bulb. It's using an all-custom enclosure and lens triplet with a metal-halide (parking lot) bulb, a-la LumenLab. Noise is not an issue any more than it is with the compact consumer projectors as long as you use a 120mm fan. At that size, the fan can push a lot of air at a low RPM. The only real issues, in fact, are size and build time. On every other aspect I consider that it matches or beats other sub-$1000 projectors, spec to spec and most certainly dollar to dollar. The LumenLab design is actually small and light enough to ceiling mount and have optical gravity keystone correction. Mind you they do take much longer to build than the overhead projector-in-a-box design. The quality is worth it.

    9. Re:It's Not Worth It by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
      For $600 you can build a 1024x768 projector with DVI input and brightness equivalent to a 1500 lumen projector. The bulbs cost $40 to replace and last 18,000 hours. Parts are cheap and interchangable, should something go wrong (heat is the major issue.)

      Your $800 refurb projector will be an 800x600 with no DVI support and $300 bulb replacements twice a year. Good luck repairing it cheaply if something else breaks.

      Don't forget noise - much noisier, and a much larger form-factor with the overhead projector... meaning you have to find someplace in your living room for the box, preferably away from your ears.

      I got a showroom model Epson Powerlite for just over a thousand dollars, with less than 20 hours of use on it. 1500 lumens, DVI, XGA, component inputs, and does 720p and 1080p. Had to buy a new lamp for the first time, after almost 2 years of use. I use it as my regular TV/video game/movie watching system, but I don't have my computer hooked up to it... which probably saved all of the bulb life. Little more expensive, yes, but worth it in the long run in less aggravation, better looks, less noise.

    10. Re:It's Not Worth It by ibullard · · Score: 1

      I may not make one of these to put in my living room, but I may make one to mount on my ceiling so I can use it during RPG games. I hope my ceiling is strong enough.

  20. Interesting tidbit from the article by Woogiemonger · · Score: 2, Informative

    When commenting on lenses, it says:

    "Many lenses are coated to improve the optics of the lens. Products like Windex will severely damage these coatings resulting in pilling, fogging, or even etching of the actually glass. FYI, most CRT monitors are subject to the same conditions. Don't ever clean your CRT with Windex or similar products. Of course you would know this if you read the manual."

    Didn't know that! :) It's nice to get immediately useful info from an article about something you don't have time for.

    1. Re:Interesting tidbit from the article by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

      Actually, your monitor's screen is quite easy to damage. It is much like the window tint on a car. (I discovered this after a kitten scratched my screen and I tried to buff the scratch out. I ended up having to peel plastic off the entire screen. After all that, my black levels sucked and I was probably getting irradiated at dangerous levels.)

  21. Light passes through? by igotmybfg · · Score: 1

    I've been reading and re-reading the article to found out how the LCD acts as an imagery medium. How does this work? When I think LCD, there is the side that faces you and has pretty pictures and whatnot, and there is the side that has a plastic casing on it. How/where does the light pass through?

    1. Re:Light passes through? by frieked · · Score: 1

      How about RTFA again.
      He explains that he uses a proxima ovation lcd panel for this project which light can pass through
      Here's a pic of it

      --

      I have often regretted my speech, never my silence.
      -Xenocrates
    2. Re:Light passes through? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      an LCD monitor actually has a backlight behind the LCD screen, so to get the picture, you actually cannibalize a monitor, and use the LCD screen itself with a bright light behind it, and Fresnel lenses to focus the image...check out http://lumenlab.com/ for more info...

    3. Re:Light passes through? by og_sh0x · · Score: 1

      An LCD monitor itself is translucent. Behind it is a light source. It's encased in plastic to keep the light from escaping out the back. Remove the casing and shine a much brighter light source through the LCD. The rest is focusing and heat removal.

    4. Re:Light passes through? by thedak · · Score: 1

      The backlight of an LCD is a luminescent sheet behind the 'sheet that faces you and has pretty pictures' so, the light passes through that part. (okay, ibooks have a luminescent sheet, others may have another lighting mechanism I seem to remember a friend's compaq armada having lighting from the right and left sides of the screen basically shining across.... very irritating in low light as you could actually see the swath of light from the sides.. *shiver* [old old 700Mhz era armada, so relax those of you who like the armadas, I agree, very nice laptops, magnesium lid, sexy]).

      So naturally as one would assume, the plastic/magnesium/titanium/whatever the heck your lid is made out of casing comes off, the luminescent screen in my case comes off (oh to hell with taking mine apart) and the LCD screen itself is used to pass light through.

    5. Re:Light passes through? by Hast · · Score: 1

      Or look at the free article over on Toms Hardware (http://www17.tomshardware.com/howto/20041113/inde x.html). It just seems a bit unnecessary to plug a pay site when he just wants basic info.

  22. Heh heh by Drog · · Score: 1

    I just refreshed it a few times. It's randomly either a golfer or NFL players. The idea being, I guess, that you're watching sports on your home theatre system.

    --

    Looking for political forums? Check out "The World Forum".

  23. Silly if your goal is to have a projector by Raunch · · Score: 1

    Now, I do admit that its bigger brothers in the 5K price region have a little bit better resolution, and a little better refresh rates. But when comparing the bottom line here 0.2K verses 5K... it still blows my mind. The real benefit here is in the budget for our version of the DIY projector, we got a really nice screen out of it.

    I bought mine on ebay for 600 dollars, and it has a remote control, will mount to the ceiling, and does NOT sound like a vacuum cleaner. Not to begruge anyone their project, but there is no good reason for anyone to ever build one of these things unless they are *really* strapped for cash, or they are bored and want to play (much better reason as far as i'm concerned).

    --
    George II -- Spreading Freedom and American values, one bomb at a time.
    1. Re:Silly if your goal is to have a projector by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I bought mine on ebay for 600 dollars, and it has a remote control, will mount to the ceiling, and does NOT sound like a vacuum cleaner.

      The noise can be easily fixed by replacing the fan.

      The main issue that concerns me was addressed in the article. Commercial projectors tend to use very expensive bulbs, for no good reason. Your $600 projector may have a bulb that will need to be replaced several times a year, which costs $100+ each time...

      Point me to a $600 projector that uses a $10 bulb... Haven't seen them yet.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:Silly if your goal is to have a projector by Trifthen · · Score: 1

      What I don't get is why they never use the equivalent of the bulbs used in car headlights. They're bright enough to light up the entire road, last forever, embarrassingly inexpensive, and I could go on like this forever.

      Build a proper enclosure based on a car headlight and reflective backing with some kind of focusing mechanism, and you'd get something smaller, quieter, using less voltage, and so on. I mean, sheesh.

      --
      Read: Rabbit Rue - Free serial nove
    3. Re:Silly if your goal is to have a projector by evilviper · · Score: 1
      What I don't get is why they never use the equivalent of the bulbs used in car headlights.

      A heavy-duty AC/DC adapter would be more expensive. When you're running on 120v AC, you really should use a 120v AC bulb for many reasons.

      However, there certainly ARE 120v projector bulbs that only cost $10 or so.

      In my experience, car headlights don't last all that long, and they don't come close to being as bright as most projector bulbs.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:Silly if your goal is to have a projector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The above few posts seem to have missed a number of important issues related to projector lamps.

      1) Projector lamps have a predictable and stable color spectrum.
      2) Projector lamps have require a very high luminous output (a basic car headlamp is 55W, an overhead projector halogen bulb can be 600W. This is required to overcome the losses in the light path, as well as leave you with a little dynamic range in the picture.
      3) These lamps must be crammed into a small space, so metal-halide lamps are used over halogen, as they have a much higher luminous output for a lower power dissipation. Hence the >$10 bulb costs. This does sacrifice some color accuracy, but you gotta do what you gotta do when price and size are factors.
      4) A projector demands are a very uniform light intensity from side to side, and it takes a carefully designed bulb and reflector combination to acheive this. Filament / arc cavity placement with respect to the reflector is critical, that's why bulbs are packaged as a complete assembly.

      And for the guy talking about AC/DC adapter costs... Even a cheap Infocus X1 has a 150W lamp in it. It's metal-halide, too, so it requires a constant-current DC supply that is also capable of supplying 6kV peaks to strike the arc. These regulated power supplies allow the projector to have a clean, constant light output regardless of AC line conditions...

      I still think CRT's rule, though...

    5. Re:Silly if your goal is to have a projector by evilviper · · Score: 1
      3) These lamps must be crammed into a small space, so metal-halide lamps are used over halogen, as they have a much higher luminous output for a lower power dissipation. Hence the >$10 bulb costs. This does sacrifice some color accuracy, but you gotta do what you gotta do when price and size are factors.

      That makes it a good idea if size is a serious issue, and price is not an issue at all, which is completely wrong. I dare say, most purchasers of projectors would be happy to buy a unit that cost significantly less, uses a much cheaper bulb, etc, that was double the size. In fact, I'm rather sure, as old LCD projectors are at least double the size of the current projectors.

      Even a cheap Infocus X1 has a 150W lamp in it. It's metal-halide, too, so it requires a constant-current DC supply that is also capable of supplying 6kV peaks to strike the arc.

      Haha. Well, there goes the whole low-power thing you were talking about... They're probably wasting 50% power, so it's a lot closer to those cheap 600watt bulbs already.

      And yes, you could easily add some electronics to get very consistent AC current. There's absolutely no need for a DC adapter and bulb.

      I still think CRT's rule, though...

      Yeah, when price is no object. When I'm paying for it, I'll stick with $300 LCDs.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  24. DIY? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How is this a "do it yourself" project? You bought an overhead projector. You bought the LCD display that was made to go on overhead projectors. You bought a screen.

    The only DIY here was "Make a box with a window in it" and that's not really a "Do it yourself LCD projector" now is it?

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    1. Re:DIY? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1
      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:DIY? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Given how inexpensive used (or even new!) SVGA and XGA projectors are, for their size, it's not worth doing this overhead crap. Sure, their bulbs are expensive, but you'll be replacing bulbs far less often than you would on an overhead unit, I think 50-100 hours on an overhead, 1000-5000 hours on a regular video projector. Overheads can get pretty loud too.

      For a perspective, I've owned a projector for about three years now and only used about 1400 hours on it. I made a nifty (IMO) ceiling mount for it, posted here:

      http://demaagd.com/hometheater/ceilingmount.htm

      I don't think that can be done half as well with an overhead projector style contraption.

  25. What a crock. by millennial · · Score: 0, Troll

    Cost: $174
    Cost of SCREEN to project onto: $110
    Why would you not just hang a sheet on your wall?

    --
    I am scientifically inaccurate.
    1. Re:What a crock. by SisyphusShrugged · · Score: 1

      He states specifically in the "guide" that projection screens increase the quality of the image significantly.

    2. Re:What a crock. by millennial · · Score: 1

      I love that I was modded 'troll'. I was dead serious. When I roomed with a guy who owned a projector, I lived in a dorm with painted cinder-block walls. All we did was hang up a sheet, and you simply cannot tell the difference from across a room. It's ludicrous to spend $110 on a screen when you can have a nearly identical quality image on a bedsheet.

      --
      I am scientifically inaccurate.
    3. Re:What a crock. by mink · · Score: 1

      Unless you weight the bottom edge or tie it down, it can move with air currents or when someone walks near it.
      It's better to spend under $30 on some plastex, wood (for a frame) and some black paint (frame again) because it wont wrinkle ot move around.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    4. Re:What a crock. by millennial · · Score: 1

      Air currents can be prevented by turning off fans and closing doors and windows. You can tell people not to walk near it. In a dorm room, that isn't very difficult. It seems stupid to me to spend money on something that could easily be free.

      --
      I am scientifically inaccurate.
  26. Dude, just... by CaptainFork · · Score: 1

    ...sit closer to your monitor!

  27. Low light v. High light by Raunch · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have to be honest, this screen is really worth it. It looks great in low light and no light situations and is very clear.

    Projectors look really good in low light and no light situations, on a sheet or a wall, or on your little brother. The test of a screen is how it does in situations with higher amounts of ambiant light.

    --
    George II -- Spreading Freedom and American values, one bomb at a time.
    1. Re:Low light v. High light by Evangelion · · Score: 1


      But a home theatre setup isn't a boardroom setup.

      A projector designed to look really good in high light situations is going to have washed out blacks, and in general be really bad looking in a low light situation.

  28. umm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why bother..

    i recently plunked $1200CDN down on a old (circa 1994) "used" (4000 hours) sony CRT.

    It will display 1080P.. which is more than enough..

    i have a 120" screen in my basement now.. and it's VGA in as well.. (RGBHV).. my mythTV (necessary linux plug) and well.. it sure beats the crap outta any LCD/DLP solution i've seen lately for $5K+ (and that's professional not some hacked together POS)

    LCD panels with overhead projector = HORRIBLE SCREEN DOOR..

    so unless your a geek with cokebottle lenses in your glasses and everything is "kinda blurry" anyway and you need a 100" screen and LARGE FONTS to even see your 800x600 screen.. then don't bother.

    OTOH.. go head and build one.. just means when i want to upgrade my CRT there'll be less people that want them. Go get your fresnel on..

    (BTW.. has slashdot been taken over by the womens network? it's full of how-to articles.. UGH.)

  29. Well, there is another DIY projector by sixpacker · · Score: 1

    and it just costs around $600. Its max resolution is 1280x1024. According to what I've heard so far, it's very nice. Visit here(Korean site), http://shop.diypro.net/?doc=cart/item.php&it_id=10 97818968

    --
    Your ego is Matrix!
  30. Re:Argh! Enough already by Jakhel · · Score: 1

    Then you can roast marshmallows on the insuing bon fire that was once your house.

  31. Sorry CT by doorbender · · Score: 1

    I thought this was a dupe. but it's not QUITE a dupe.

    http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/05/13/03 31241&tid=222&tid=4

    --
    "He's a real midnight golfer"
  32. Strong light by Doppleganger · · Score: 1

    "Light passing threw the film, and interacting with a shutter created the viewable content."

    Beware of flying film, particularly when it's thrown by passing photons.

    1. Re:Strong light by dbfruth · · Score: 1

      Who cares! it was cheep

  33. Thanks! by Drog · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the excellent advice.

    --

    Looking for political forums? Check out "The World Forum".

  34. Geeks in fabric stores by Woogiemonger · · Score: 1

    We will be using some felt that we acquired at the local fabric store. Now I will say this on the note of the fabric store types: Not Geeks! These are the types of people that never get out and experience the world. And their idea of creative or innovative thinking is using a slightly-different-than-recommended shade of embroidery floss for their "There's No Place Like Home" wall hanging or pillow. So don't be surprised if you feel really uncomfortable in a fabric store. I sure as hell did! And people make fun of geeks dressing up like Jedi for star wars premiers and waiting in lines for days to be the first one in the door for the 12:01 AM showing....

    He touched on exactly which geeks you might find in a fabric store. Roleplaying geeks! Not just Star Wars fanatics, but trekkologists, otaku, and LARPers. Geeks are everywhere... you just need need the right eyewear to see them.

  35. DIY? Where? by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    All they did was take an LCD screen, designed to be used with overhead projectors, and put it onto an overhead projector. The only "DIY" was the case they built out of "partial board" and covered with black felt.

    My department bought one of those transparent LCD screens in 1997, back when overhead projectors were still to be found in every lecture hall, laptops were $3000 and LCD projectors were $5000 and as big as a suitcase. The idea was to use this to go from the computer screen to the wall screen on the cheap. It was used every once in awhile, but if you weren't using a laptop, it was a pain to use, since you had to wheel in a cart with a desktop PC.

    Once laptops got cheap enough so that they were commonplace, LCD projectors had gotten cheap enough that the department bought one and consigned the transparent LCD screen, with its terrible picture quality, to the back closet of the copier room. There, it collected dust, along with all of the other obsolete junk that no one wanted to use anymore, but had cost too much to just throw away.

    The transparent LCD screen was an ugly kludge, a bridge technology to mate the old with the new. Let it die.

    --
    The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
  36. Nothing new here by davidmcg · · Score: 1

    I seen plans for this on the web years ago. There's nothing here that hasn't been posted on 100's of websites already.

  37. To All Those That Claim That This is Useless by oblivionboy · · Score: 1

    I would suggest you just relax. Aside from the obvious, "MAYBE I WANT TO BUILD MY OWN PROJECTOR", excuse, there are some very good reasons for an article like this. For example, I have several older laptops sitting around. One of them is a Compaq that is powerful enough to play MPEG video at SVGA, but the backlite is gone. And even if the backlite was gone, I still don't use it because its a few years old.

    So in fact I've been thinking of some uses for this machine, and I can see that this would be perfect. Anyone else that has an older laptop and doesn't mind pulling it apart to make a project could make one cheaply. It would then become a dedicated video playback system. With Project. Great for parties!

    People on slashdot do have parties don't they? :) .o.

  38. Seconded! by gilesjuk · · Score: 2, Informative

    Look at the cost of life of the bulbs in OHPs. Typically 50 hours and cost of about £30-50 here in the UK.

    Bulb life in a projector is typically 2000 hours (4000 in mine) and cost about £250 for the bulb.

    So using 2000 hours as an example:

    Projector cost £599 will last 2000 hours so total cost for first 200 hours is £599.

    Self made projector will cost about £200-300, for 2000 hours of use you'll need 40 bulbs at £30 a go which works out at £1200 for bulbs and £200-300 so grand total of £1400-1500 (for which you can get a good DLP).

    You also end up with a big ugly box which you can't place anywhere easily, a projector with no analog inputs, no warranty, no adjustments to compensate for placement etc etc.

    Just buy a projector, it'll be safer too, something you can leave for 30 minutes and know you aren't going to come back to a fire.

  39. My only question about this... by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

    Is that I remember in college a professor of mine using one of these overhead LCD projector doo-dads and she had to constantly turn the overhead off while lecturing because the heat of the projector would start to "burn" the LCD and the image would be distorted on the screen. After cooling down it would work again, but still during a 2+ hour movie or gaming session... I just can't see how this will work.

    Now overhead projector technology may have come a long way (hehe) since then but isn't this an issue? At the very least, especially when it is crammed in a felt-lined box.

    Anyone know?

    --
    http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    1. Re:My only question about this... by hellomynameisclinton · · Score: 1

      I'll try to field this one.

      Cooling is a serious concern for building a projector. However, it's more complicated than just making it as cold as possible. Light sources have expected operation temperatures, which if you deviate from, cause terrible effects such as shorter life, or poor color reproduction. For example, halogen lights from overhead projectors are EXPECTED to operate at high temperatures, so if you look at the projector case fan, it's actually a semi-slow fan not moving much air. You could even crack the bulb if you introduce a large enough temperature difference (such as a direct fan on your bulb).

      Surprisingly, it's not too hard to cool your LCD though, a single case fan is more than enough for my projector, as long as a space remains between the stage and the LCD. Temperature never rises much.

      Lastly, if you're one of the "it's not DIY" folk - the project isn't for you. If you're one of the "I can buy it" folk, then you don't care about color reproduction, 1080p, or tinkering as much as we do.

    2. Re:My only question about this... by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      I appreciate the response but I think you missed my question. I am quite well versed in DIY/Hacks hardware, software, Audio, and visual (and even mineral and vegetable :) So yes, I understand about light temps, etc.

      What my question is is that these LCD projectors for Overhead projectors (as is used in the article) are only made to be used for short periods at a time due to the heat from the overhead's bulb causing the LCD part to begin to distort. If you haven't please read the article and you will see it is a two part system: A regular classroom overhead projector as the light source and lens, and a overlay LCD product that sits on top of the overhead as a transparency would.

      Just like leaving a transparancy on top of a overhead for two straight hours would bake it into a nice rendition of a shrinky-dink the same happens to the delicate lcd projector overlay. I college my professor used one of these units and the overhead had to be turned off for periods while she lectured to keep it from warping/distorting the LCD overlay. I have a feeling this would be the same in this case and am wondering if it is or not.

      I would love to build a DIY projector (I even entertained the one where you put a TV upside down in a box with a fresnel lens on the front - like the plans sold to idiots on Ebay claiming a huge projection TV)

      Again, any response is appreciated.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    3. Re:My only question about this... by hellomynameisclinton · · Score: 1

      Second attempt :) Heat is not a problem. Yes the stage gets hot. The trick is to leave an air gap between the stage and the LCD with a case fan (or multiple if you're really worried), and enough air flows to keep the LCD a little warm to the touch. If you're doing an overhead hack like this, most of your heat problem is already solved, because the projector case isolates most of the heat anyway. The most inconvenient part of this type of build is that you're stuck using the halogen projector bulbs. For power/cool/light quality, you can do this identical build, except bolt in your own 250W double-ended (HQI) metal halide light (and ballast!). It is cooler, but (probably) generates UV that you need to filter out.

    4. Re:My only question about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IR blocking glass

  40. here's a video for making your own video projector by shraggedfizz · · Score: 1
  41. Proxima 944+? Unobtanium. by larsoncc · · Score: 3, Informative

    According to this link the Proxima Ovation 944+ is 8 grand new. Not that anyone would pay that, right? Well...

    None are listed on eBay.

    Finished auctions on eBay list at about 300. That's fine, but try to find one!

    Kind of eliminates the ability to do this project, doesn't it?

    I don't understand why all of these DIY projects have to use some amount of unobtainium. Why not price out some NEW parts, ones that are currently on the market? Leave it as an exercise for the reader to find used or discounted products.

    Only then can you make a fair assessment of whether or not one of these projects is "do-able."

    I would love to see some names / brands of recommended overhead projection panels - but unfortunately, THAT is left up to the reader. I thought making these recommendations was a key part of a DIY article. After all, look at Woodworking magazine or any other DIY magazine - they all list the parts, the specs of the parts, and typically, a price or two with each.

  42. Real LCD Projectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Real LCD Projectors actually use three seperate panels with each panel reproducing a primary colour. The light source is filtered into the primaries. Each colour then passes through its own panel and the image is recombined and then projected.

  43. Or just BUY one by leon.gandalf · · Score: 0

    The things are getting pretty low in price compared to other technologies... http://www.radioshack.com/content/promotionalpages /promo13.asp?find=DLP(keyword)&hp=search/

  44. Re:Argh! Enough already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you geeks make enough money to buy a real projector?

    What's the point of being a geek unless you can make some bank, stay at home in a darkened room with lots of Mountain Dew, and enjoy your own company?

  45. This is NOT DIY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is BIY "Buy It Yourself"

    Making a crappy (and this one is REALLY crappy) "enclosure" for 2 electronics is not DIY.

    He even spent over $100 on a screen! DIYers have been making projection screens under $20 for years.

  46. hehe by doorbender · · Score: 1

    can you show me how to get %300 back? ;-)

    --
    "He's a real midnight golfer"
  47. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  48. Is this the death of zombie Slashdot? by CompressedAir · · Score: 1

    I've built an LCD projector. Despite all the naysayers here, it gave an excellent picture, it looked pretty snazzy, my girlfriend thought it was cool, and it was much quieter than an X1, which is the projector I compared it to.

    I used a 17" 1280x768 flat panel monitor, a 250 watt metal halide bulb, a pair of 220mm focal length fresnels and a triplet lens out of a 3M 9200 projector.

    All you people bitching about how a DIY projector looks sitting in your living room should be ashamed of yourself. If you cannot design and build a good looking case, that is your fault.

    Hmmm, what does a 1280x768 native projector sell for these days? 2 or 3 grand? I built mine for $400, and it took about a month. Most of that time was making the case.

    Sadly for my DIY projector hobby, I saw a CRT projector and was completely blown away. I picked up a Sony 1270Q CRT projector with mint tubes for $400, and I'm pleased as punch. The contrast in a CRT (and bear in mind, my CRT is 10+ years old) is better than even the $10000 modern LCDs and DLPs. I know, I have compared them.

    So, to summarize for all you whipper-snappers who don't have the skill or patience to build a good DIY LCD projector: It is possible, fun, cheap, and interesting to build your own LCD projector. You can easily beat the resolution and color depth availible in current LCD projectors for a quarter of the cost.

    But if you really care about the image, get an old CRT. It's 4' long, 3' wide, 2' tall, has 3 7" lenses, and weighs 150lbs, but damn that image is something else.

    (P.S. CRTs don't have native resolutions, but for those who keep score my CRT can resolve about ~650 lines when it is properly setup. So while I lose some lines while watching 720p and 1080i, the image still looks fantastic. A good 8" or 9" CRT will do 1080p without breaking a sweat, but those will still cost you a few grand.)

  49. Re:spend the same on a widescreen CRT but sit clos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so sit way back. duh.

  50. Re:spend the same on a widescreen CRT but sit clos by hilaryduff · · Score: 1

    if i could afford such a big room, id be able to afford a proper projector...

  51. Why Would You Bother? by PhYrE2k2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why oh why would anyone bother?

    I recently purchased a very lovely DLP projector for business purposes. NEC, 1024x768, 5lbs. Composite, RGB, Component, S-Video inputs, a remote, etc. all for about $1,000CDN ($815USD). Similarly, you can get units like this from major retailers for $750-$1500 with spare bulbs, cables, etc. This project has a cost of "$200-800", but realistically, you're in the higher range if you want a decent LCD panel with good resolution, inputs, etc. and a bright enough projector.

    So yes- this has the geek factor to it and all your friends will find it amusing that you were able to make a projector to fill your wall. These projects are intended to SAVE tons of money in DIY projects as well as add to the geek factor.

    Instead, we have a big clunking machine, built on parts with low bulb life, not intended to go for hours on end, poor cooling, and far from optimal quality (usually splotchy projection comes from the overhead projectors).

    Don't bother with this project. If you're going to spend this much, go out and buy a real projector. It'll be great for computers, home theatre, presentations, etc. and you'll be able to drag it over to a friend's house to have movies on a king sized bed sheet draped over his/her garage. :)

    The costs of real projectors have come down! FOur to five years ago, a good portable projector was $3000-$5000. Nowdays it's $750-$1500- cheaper than most backlit projection TVs. Go buy a real projector.

    -M

    --

    when you see the word 'Linux', drink!
    1. Re:Why Would You Bother? by jerzee_devil · · Score: 1

      While I'm not going to argue with you on a lot of your reasons for not building a DIY projector, many are valid points, bulb life is certainly not one of them. My Lumenlab projector uses a $20 bulb that has a life of 20,000 hours. Compare that to a commercial projector with a $300 bulb that lasts 1,000 hours if you are lucky. While the initial cost may be only a little more for a low end projector, if you actually use it everyday, bulb replacement cost is going to be an issue.

  52. Not a good primary display by monsterX · · Score: 1

    I built one of these in college using a vga panel and an overhead projector. It was easy and cheap to build, but quite a hassle to use. The room had to be extremely dark and the contrast on the panel sucked. The panel also seemed to overheat a lot and sometimes even got burned. It really wasn't a good solution for casual viewing. I switched back to my 19inch CRT.

  53. Re:spend the same on a widescreen CRT but sit clos by tabrnaker · · Score: 1
    less so than an 800x600 affordable projector.

    This comment shows lack of insight and/or knowledge of projectors.

  54. LCD monitor panels != LCD projector panels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AFAIK proper home theater LCD projectors are not constructed in this way at all. They use three separate LCD panels and so have much much better pictures. This isn't a cheap alternative to buying a real LCD projector; it's a fundamentally inferior solution.

  55. Re:spend the same on a widescreen CRT but sit clos by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

    You say that but many people are watching normal TV resolutions with quite large screens. HDTV (and HD DVD) is required for anything above 1024x768.

  56. from the website... by milimetric · · Score: 1

    "and yes we are working on the "spelling issues" I am a computer geek, not a english major... deal with it!" I read through the rest of the article and it was almost amusing how many spelling errors they have. I would suggest using a spellchecker but the words they're using are actual words, so it wouldn't help. Like threw for through and setup for set up or a instead of an. Just a little piece of advice... if you write for Tom's Hardware Guide, get a really really really patient editor. Love your articles though... hope you get time to keep doing it.

    1. Re:from the website... by typical · · Score: 1

      Like threw for through and setup for set up or a instead of an.

      You should quote words when you are referring to the word itself and not their meaning. For instance:

      Like "threw" for "through" and "setup" for "set up" or "a" instead of "an".

      (I'm waiting for someone to call me out on using British style for the placement of my period and quote marks in the preceeding sentence...)

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
  57. $300 vs $40 lamps by wsanders · · Score: 1

    Just to dispel any rumors the The Man is making you pay $300 for a $40 lamp in a commercially available projector, the $300 lamp is a "UHE" type arc lamp and the $40 lamp is a halogen. The UHE is going to produce I'd guess about twice as much light, with 1/2 the power consumption, it's going to last about as long as the halogen (1500 to 2000 hr) and it's going to have a much higher color temperature.

    If you were really into DIY you'd homebrew an arc lamp power supply, but it's tricky, you can't just plug the arc lamp into voltage, the current has to be regulated, similar to a flourescent light ballast.

    Mistakes with arc lamps can be fun - for the small lamps in home projectors blowing one up would not be a big disaster (though expensive). I worked once as a commerical projectionist, we would get replacement arc lamps as big around as your thumb for our projectors shipped in wooden crates with layer upon layer of padding and big labels on the outside "MISHANDLING WILL RESULT IN DEATH".

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  58. Useful links by hellomynameisclinton · · Score: 1

    www.diyaudio.com (The Moving Image section)
    www.lumenlab.com
    www.diyprojectorcompan y.com

    And if you find yourself getting into DIY try
    www.hackaday.com - at least one hack a week will be cool.

  59. lcd? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

    Building a LCD projector is a bit like building an old-style bicycle with the one huge wheel and no gear/chain system. There is better technology now, called DLP. There is no reason to mess with LCD anymore.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  60. Sony / GLV / World Expo 2005 by Venner · · Score: 1

    I've been waiting (and drooling) over the prospect of laser projection techs for the last 10 years or so. Sony's done a lot in the field recently. In fact, they have a 2005 inch screen set up at their exhibition building at the 2005 World's Fair in Seto, Japan. I dearly wish I could see this thing in person...

    http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/GxL/

    Be sure to have a look at their tech explanation too. They went with the Grating Light Valve design, using MEMS.

    --
    A preposition is a terrible thing to end a sentence with.
  61. Give DIY a Chance, 1920x1200 for $1,000 by minoten · · Score: 0, Troll

    I can understand everyone being unimpressed with this article, but do not cast doubt upon DIY LCD projectors so suddenly.

    I built a projector with a resolution of 1920x1200 (WUXGA) - for around $1,000. My screen size is 102" diag, with my projector mounted behind me in the closet (silent).

    Up to now people were limited to 1024x768 (XGA) resolution in their DIY Projectors, and that just isnt much these days. I set out to change this.

    I accomplished a WUXGA resolution by utilizing a previously unusable LCD Panel, a laptop LCD Display.

    I ended up using the SHARP 15.4" WUXGA displays used in laptops, and had a custom controller made for the LCD panel. The controller features PiP, PbP, DVI-D, VGA, Component, Composite, S-video, Remote, and other advanced features.

    I have not heard one complaint from anyone who has watched my projector, in fact they all beg me to build them one or try to buy mine off of me.

    For those interested in some REAL DIY with some REAL results, go to http://www.lumenlabs.com/, that is where I learned about all the necessary things to build a projector.

    For those interested in the LCD Display setup I used, I offer them in the US & Canada once every few months in a group buy format. Read about it here: http://members.cox.net/minoten and here: http://www.lumenlab.com/forums/index.php?showtopic =4203

  62. Not for living room, but for basement! by glindsey · · Score: 1
    this is just another "Overhead projectors with LCD panels make big ugly projectors that you cannot use anywhere but a darkened room" story
    Which makes them perfect for a makeshift basement theater: plenty of room, very little (if any) light that can't be blocked, and the whole thing is relatively cheap to implement. If I could find a used or refurbished overhead projector for cheap, I'd be all over this solution. Yeah, you're probably not going to get 1080i out of a cheap LCD panel, but if it does at least 1024x768 you can do 720i. Throw in a computer with a Hauppauge WinTV-HD and maybe a WinTV-PVR or two and you've got a pretty respectable system. Maybe not hyper-theaterphile quality, but I'd sure enjoy it in my basement.

    My only question has to do with the ramifications of enclosing the projector in a box; what about air flow, heat dissipation, and the like? I'd be throwing in a 120 CFM fan or two, noise or not. Better to have to turn the volume up than to start a fire!
    1. Re:Not for living room, but for basement! by Timtimes · · Score: 1

      It'll still look like crap. I know. I have an OHP and LCD panel. I also own a Benq 6200 DLP. Don't even waste your time with that old LCD technology. The contrast ratio alone is so bad it's ridiculous. You can buy a used DLP on ebay for about $500. Enjoy.

      --
      This ain't no upwardly mobile freeway This is the road to hell
    2. Re:Not for living room, but for basement! by JaxGator75 · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing this still uses expensive bulbs, tho???

      --
      Come and see the violence inherent in the system!
  63. Done that... by toddestan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I got a free, working overhead projector from the curb on one fine trash day, and later I was given a fairly decent laptop with a screen that had a broken backlight and was not economically feasible to repair. I combined the two to create an LCD projector just as you describe. Pictures can be seen here: Click (please be kind to this server!).

    Advantages:
    *Cheap (I did it for $0.00)
    *Easy
    *Totally ghetto-fabulous.

    Disadvantages:
    *Really, really crappy quality (only really could be used for video, and only if you weren't picky about quality)
    *Edges got cut off because the LCD was larger than the projector
    *Pretty dim
    *Noisy
    *In my case, could only work with the laptop who's screen I tore apart

    So in summary, if you have the parts laying around and have some time to kill - go for it. Otherwise don't even bother.

  64. Don't Waste Your Time !!!! by Timtimes · · Score: 1

    Not to knock what they've done (I did it myself using an Nview panel and OHP combo a couple years ago), but I think they're being a little misleading in their enthusiastic appraisal of the end product. Not only do those late model LCD panels have latency issues, but the contrast ratio on them is so bad they're practically useless for watching movies/tv. And that 'cheap' bulb??? Not really. $10 for 50 hours (lifespan of OHP bulbs) is 20 cents per hour. Guess what? A $400 bulb (like the one that goes in my Benq DLP) lasts 3000 hours in economy mode. That's 13 cents per hour, almost HALF as much as the OHP bulbs. They are also heavily biased in their cost analysis when saying that Proxima panel can be had for $25. Not saying it's impossible, just hightly unlikely. There are LCD panels in that price range, but not the 944. It's still going for well over $100 in hobbyist circles. Matter of fact, a quick Ebay search for completed Proxima listings shows that an Ovation 842 just sold for $90 shipped. The cables that go to those panels normally sell for almost as much as is being quoted for the entire panel !! When all is said and done, you'll likely spend over $200 to get a barely watchable 1990's LCD panel with an overhead projector that costs twice as much to operate and is 10-20 times as big and heavy as just purchasing a real projector. You can buy a used Infocus X1 or Benq 6100 for around $500. Either of these units will make that Proxima panel look like the waste of time it really is.

    --
    This ain't no upwardly mobile freeway This is the road to hell
    1. Re:Don't Waste Your Time !!!! by mink · · Score: 1

      Not to knock what you are saying but you are being a bit misleading about DIY projectors.
      First you dont have to use an old OHP LCD from the early 90's.

      You can use the LCD screen aout of quite a few monitors and laptops (that are more recent and not intended for OHP use).

      As for OHP bulbs you can replace the bog standard gear with a $40 (roughly I cant remember if the ballast costs much more) 20K hour lamp. Hows that commpare to a $300-400 1-4K hour lamp?

      You can using about as much money as one of the low end commercial refurbs cost (something you dont mention about the low price you quote) to make something much better.

      This is limited by ones willingness to do the work, and sometimes people get lucky with auctions or clearance sales and manage to get parts at a good discount, so it's always worth asking people who brag about the high quality projects costing under $300 how and what they bought.

      You can also make them quieter then the comercial projectors, again if you put some work into the design stage.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  65. Cheaper DIY by theendlessnow · · Score: 1
    1. Small platform, a bench or chair can work, but needs to be moveable.

    2. Any size television or monitor.

    Free Instructions:

    Sit on your moveable platform and move really, really close to the television or monitor.

    If you like I'll sell you the complete instruction with illustrations for only $19.99!!

  66. Ouch by kenwood720 · · Score: 1

    That was harsh. Even if this article is a dupe, it's still creative.

    1. Re:Ouch by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Creative? They cut a hole in a box and shine an overhead out of it. It's not a DIY projector, it's a DIY "hole in a box"

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  67. Totally bogus. Lumenlab tons better but still.. by mattr · · Score: 1
    Like another poster mentioned, this article is so un-DYI it took my breath away. Buying a cheap projector, lcd intended for projector and turning the lights off is NOT DYI, it's a 20 years old idea. The LumenLab link above is tons more interesting, though it didn't answer the two main questions I've had for a loooong time as I also want something like this, mainly low cost/heat/power LEDs and the lens/mirror setup for more than just straight ahead projection.

    1. I don't want a small room that would love a 6 foot image to death, to turn into a hothouse because of all the heat generated. I would much rather find a way to get enough LEDs to approximate 3500 lumens, without presumably generating any heat.

    2. I'd like to plaster as much of the room with focused data, in other words using mirrors, some kind of fisheye or telescopic lens, or perhaps a conic mirror. This also means I need the highest resolution possible, though multiple panels might be acceptable.

    3. The main aims are to make a planetarium and also to experiment with interfaces. In other words a cheap CAVE / CAVERN system would be real nice. If anybody can point to / provide info about what kind of a setup would be needed to replace the giant radiator with cold LEDs, please post on!

    1. Re:Totally bogus. Lumenlab tons better but still.. by mattr · · Score: 1

      Incidentally I've seen camera/projector combos aimed from the ceiling down toward a wall mounted whiteboard. A pod sprouting a few of these would be awesome.

  68. I am planning to build a projector... by cr0sh · · Score: 1
    Probably sometime this coming winter. I have browsed various forums and such extensively on information about how to do this, most notably the Lumenlab site (btw - this is an excellent resource - some of the forums you need to be a customer to access, I like the site so much that when I do get around to building, I plan on getting the plans to get the better access).

    Currently, I have most of the parts I need - mainly, I just need the proper fresnels and wood to make the case. I have the LCD, the projection lens I plan to use one off of a busted LP20 projector, but I am still stuck on a light source...

    First off - I am cheap (can you tell?). I have looked into metal halide solutions, and I like them, but it seems impossible to get a low-cost 400W ballast and the mogul base. Once you bump past about 150W, the price gets large, quickly. The bulb price is reasonable, though.

    I have thought about trying a halogen work lamp - cheap, easy to get - but they get VERY VERY hot. I have heard (but not experienced) that a metal halide lamp runs cooler - but if the price for the ballast is insane, it is only worth it if there is good reason.

    Something I am worried about that I have heard about a halogen work lamp, is that since the lamp is bright along the length of it (not a "point" source), you get a bright line in the image (but I wonder why you don't get a bright point using other lamps?) - how true is this? Does the color temp difference between halogen and metal halide make a big difference? Is there other lamp configurations I should look at (automobile, or small reflector halogens)?

    A lot of questions on my mind - and not a lot of answers out there in the forums I have visited. Most homebrewers of DIY projectors have seemed to settle on metal halide. I haven't seen any others. Looks like I will be experimenting...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  69. fixed link by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

    http://demaagd.com/hometheater/ceilingmount.html

    My mistake for not checking the link.

  70. Re:Argh! Enough already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Then you can roast marshmallows on the insuing bon fire that was once your house."

    I'm sure you meant to say 'your Mother's house'

  71. Expensive bulbs by Timtimes · · Score: 1

    Cheaper on a per hour cost basis than OHP bulbs. The bulb costs need to be considered. The Benq has a $400 bulb that lasts 3000 hours in economy mode. But here's my thinking and why I went DLP. I was ready to spend $3k on a dinky 40-50 inch plasma. I normally run my DLP at 100". Any clue as to how much a 100" plasma would cost? I have to buy a LOT of $400 bulbs and watch for tens of thousands of hours before I even get to the $3k mark I was intending to spend on the dinky plasma. Enjoy.

    --
    This ain't no upwardly mobile freeway This is the road to hell
  72. On the Heat Issue by Timtimes · · Score: 1

    My Benq 6200 DLP has a 200 watt bulb. Not enough to worry with. You may want to check on what the power consumption of a plasma is. They can be upwards of 500 watts, which IS ENOUGH TO CAUSE HEAT ISSUES. My OHP bulb is 400 watts, though I never use it anymore since getting a real projector. Enjoy.

    --
    This ain't no upwardly mobile freeway This is the road to hell
    1. Re:On the Heat Issue by mattr · · Score: 1

      Thanks a bunch for the pointers, will certainly look into it. Of course, it might be a good way to heat the apartment in the winter time..!

  73. Lamp Issues by Timtimes · · Score: 1

    Metal Halide is the bulb of choice for diy'ers because even though you consider it 'expensive', when compared to just about any alternative light source, it is the best option. You have to deal with color temperature as well as longevity. Instead of looking at how much the thing costs straight outta the box you need to run the numbers on how much it costs per hour versus the alternatives. Can't remember the lifespan of Metal Halide, but I recall it being quite a bit higher than some of the alternatives. You really don't want to build one yourself unless you're doing it for 'the fun and challenge'. You won't save any money over buying a used DLP, and your results will likely not be very good. The main reason that LCD sucks is the CONTRAST RATIO. The best you're gonna find, even if you spend several hundred bucks on a newer screen is probably 500:1. DLP is 2000:1 and many people BITCH about that (CRT sets typically 5-10k:1 CR) In plain English that means your blackest black is gonna be GREY. Enjoy

    --
    This ain't no upwardly mobile freeway This is the road to hell
    1. Re:Lamp Issues by cr0sh · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info - as I noted before, I haven't started on this project, so I am still researching the lighting angle. This is definitely a "for fun and challenge" project (heck, look at my website - it is simply one of many). As far as saving money, unless I can somehow magically get a used DLP projector for under $500.00, I think I will save the money. Most of my parts are used parts - my LCD cost me $25.00 (I have a piece about it on my site - it is an old Sony LCD. I haven't updated my page to reflect it, but since the time of posting that page I have managed to get the parts swapped and everything but the backlight works. All I need to do is get the backlight running to know the quality of the LCD, whether there is anything else wrong with it - I know it works in some fashion because I can see a "ghost" of an image of my desktop on it w/o a backlight). The projector I got (I was going to repair it, but it needs a new power supply and that costs bucks - so I am just going to scavenge parts from it - come to think about it, I could use the light from it) was a busted thing I picked up for $80.00 - so - all I need is the wood to build the case and assorted other parts. I don't think the C/R ratio will bother me that much - a guy I know has an older projector that is LCD and it looks pretty good. Although it might bug me after a while - I do like good blacks and contrast in an image...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  74. clicky URLs for the lazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  75. Re:Proxima 944+? Unobtanium. by Nik13 · · Score: 1

    I have to agree. I've read a bit about those as it seemed like you could save lots of money.

    But that was counting you could easily get all the parts for cheap (those 50% rebates on LCDs in big names stores I've never seen - or broken ones on ebay that sell for cheap - which never seems to happen either).

    Plus, most places selling plans for them also try to sell you some of the parts (lenses, reflectors, etc), and not for cheap either.

    When you add the REAL prices of all the parts, the plans, the wood (some people seem to do their build an enclosure, then redo it right the 2nd time) and lots of miscellaneous [not always cheap] hardware.

    That's not counting your time either, that's also taking for granted nothing bad will happen (break the LCD, electrocution risks for some, lamp temperatures can almost be a fire hazard or melt the LCD...).

    So you get a big and ugly project-box looking projector in your living room (no thanks), and for not much cheaper than a retail projector (if at all). The increased resolution of the monitor (if you bought a more expensive one) isn't probably making that much of a difference, unless you got really good optics too, and a very good design, and most don't have either (heck, isn't the whole point of this DIY to save money? Won't see any multicoated carl zeiss glass here!).

    I've seen projectors on special at big retail chains (like staples) for like 800$ CDN - and they were easy to find and in stock. It looks nice and profesionnal, it's small, portable, runs cool-ish, has keystone correction, has a remote control, accepts all kinds of input types, it is brighter, has deinterlacing (faroudja DCDi!), and the lamp life isn't bad (would last me a couple years at least).

    Why would someone want to spend time and as much money to make their own inferior product? I don't know.

    --
    ///<sig />