Slashdot Mirror


Remembering Netscape and The Birth of the Web

bigdaddyhale writes "Picture a world without Google, without eBay or Amazon or broadband, where few people have even heard of IPOs. That was reality just a decade ago. The company that changed it--bringing us into the Internet age--was a brilliant flash in the pan called Netscape. For the tenth anniversary of its IPO, FORTUNE recruited dozens of players to tell the story of Netscape in their own words."

280 comments

  1. DMZ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Picture a world without Google, without eBay or Amazon or broadband, where few people have even heard of IPOs.

    Welcome to the demilitarized zone!

    1. Re:DMZ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      you mean that mythical internet that had nothing but information that was solid and believeable and had a signal to noise ratio that was so low that many usually did not question a post on usenet?

      Gopher was my friend, email was useable, usenet was great and IRC was the new kid on the block.

      gimmie!

    2. Re:DMZ by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Not question a post on Usenet?

      What decade are you from? The 50's?

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  2. I did not know Netscape invented the internet.. by chrispix · · Score: 1, Funny

    I thought it was Al Gore that invented the internet

    1. Re:I did not know Netscape invented the internet.. by Raistlin77 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nobody said Netscape invented the internet. However, one could argue that Netscape invented public interest in the internet.

    2. Re:I did not know Netscape invented the internet.. by jamesbuko · · Score: 2, Funny

      All the while i thought it was Bill Gates....

    3. Re:I did not know Netscape invented the internet.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      warning, harry potter book 6 spoiler alert
      mod parent troll

    4. Re:I did not know Netscape invented the internet.. by Baorc · · Score: 1

      Man I really thought YOU were joking, but you aren't that idiot actually posted a spoiler. Dumbass. MOD GP TROLL!

  3. How'd it change day to day work? by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sam Jadallah: There was definitely a buzz at Microsoft about the Internet--we were trying to understand why everybody was getting all hyped up. Certainly for us up in the Northwest, we didn't know what to make of it. It seemed pretty cool, pretty exciting, but really what were you going to do with it? How was it going to change your day-to-day work?

    By doing this. :)

    1. Re:How'd it change day to day work? by sgant · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was using the Internet way before the commercialization of it...back in the days when "The Internet" consisted mainly of Usenet, IRC and FTP.

      Gopher was a new thing also, but not very big and when Mosaic came out with their World Wide Web I said over and over again how it wasn't ever going to catch on, that it was just a fad.

      Meh...I never said I was a visionary.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    2. Re:How'd it change day to day work? by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Heh. I remember MS apologists going on even in 1998 and 1999 about how the whole Internet / WWW was just a passing fad that would soon blow over. Didn't Win95 almost ship without a TCP/IP stack?

      At the time though, I though I was a bit slow to catch on myself. Usenet was where everything was happening (For some categories it still is) and I saw Mosaic, but couldn't ever figure out what it was for or even find a working URL. Then some months later, when I did find one, it linked to a handful of sites all linking to each other and containing only a list of the rest of the handful of sites.

      What was the break through for me was that it was similar to Hypercard and I could arrange for material to be put up. Towards the end of 1994, I had arranged for the departmental IT staff to make a web accessible space on one of the departmental unix servers. Then I had HTML versions of previously paper-only tutorials to be posted there. No big deal, I thought. It was for a large class with a few hundred students, but the few that use the tutorials will continue to use the paper copies anyway.

      Wrong. With a major exam on a Monday, starting Friday afternoon, it became progressively harder to reach the servers for anything, even e-mail. By the time Sunday night rolled around, there was effectively a denial of service going on. I had set up the documents with internal links and pared the diagrams down to one or two KB. However, the browser kept polling the server even for the internal links and reloading everything. That clogged the 2Mb/s network.

      That got the attention of the faculty and put WWW on the map, at least for the department. After that, web versions of tutorials were considered essential and an established part of the administration by 1995.

      --
      Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
    3. Re:How'd it change day to day work? by jonadab · · Score: 2, Informative

      > Didn't Win95 almost ship without a TCP/IP stack?

      No, but it shipped with it turned off by default. You had to go into the
      Network Neighborhood properties and Add Protocol and all that jazz to get it
      turned on. Also, SMB/CIFS didn't bind to TCP/IP by default, only to NetBEUI.

      Basically, TCP/IP had the same level of support as IPX/SPX.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    4. Re:How'd it change day to day work? by wayoutwest · · Score: 1

      I remember using other vendor's IP stack because the MS one was a resource hog and didn't like to talk to the unix servers consistently. Geez, I think this was a world before Samba, because I remember a Guiness drench evening discussing how implementing Samba would solve problems and how we were going to sell this to the stuffed shirts.
      Amazing how long ago and how recent all this really is...

    5. Re:How'd it change day to day work? by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1
      No, but it shipped with it turned off by default. You had to go into the Network Neighborhood properties and Add Protocol and all that jazz to get it turned on...
      That's in line with what I said, that Windows 95 almost shipped without a TCP/IP stack. It's something that I would like to find an authoritative reference for. I vaguely recall that it was a very, very last minute addition made over the protestations of Bill himself If so there wouldn't be time to have it turned on by default or that services bind to it by default. Previously, it was necessary to use a third party stack to access the Internet to use the Web and Gopher.
      --
      Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
    6. Re:How'd it change day to day work? by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Previously, it was necessary to use a third party stack to
      > access the Internet to use the Web and Gopher.

      I know that was true in Windows 3.1 and 3.11 for Workgroups. (The one most folks used was made by Trumpet.) I do not know what the situation was in the first release of NT.

      > It's something that I would like to find an authoritative reference for.

      As far as what actually shipped, I still have the Win95 OSR2 CD that came with my January-1998 PC, but I don't need to check, because I'm quite certain that when I installed the network card I had to manually go into the setup (right click on Network Neighborhood, choose Properties) and hit the Add button, choose Protocol, select Microsoft under vendor, and choose TCP/IP. They also had "IPX/SPX Compatible Protocol" in there (apparently they were afraid of trademarks just calling it IPX/SPX) and at least one other thing, I forget what. My memory of this is quite clear because I re-installed Windows a couple of times and had to redo it. This is OSR2, but I have many times seen lists of the differences between Win 95 A and OSR2, and this has never been on any of the lists, so I imagine it probably was not changed. (Things I know about that were changed: added FAT32, with accompanying changes in format and fdisk, as well as of course the filesystem itself, added half-baked USB drivers that never worked with any actual USB hardware, added several promotional icons on the desktop and in the start menu, fixed a couple of minor bugs. FAT32 was the only thing to get excited about.)

      But you were probably wanting documentation on Microsoft's internal decision process? There probably never was any, officially, outside of Microsoft. Just rumours, probably. That's how it usually is.

      What we do know, though, is what Microsoft was encouraging people to use. As I said, file and print sharing by default used NetBEUI. You could bind it to IPX/SPX or TCP/IP, but the default was to not bind it to those protocols. Additionally, if you read the press releases and documentation and stuff Microsoft was putting out at the time, it was all about their NT networking stuff, WINS in the role that DNS fills today, and so on. Then circa 1999, when they were starting to get serious about NT5/Win2000, they suddenly started talking about using TCP/IP "natively". That sounds a little too technical, so when Win2K actually shipped their marketing department rephrased it "Built for the Internet". (My thoughts at the time were along the lines of, "Yeah, Windows 2000 may be built for the internet, but the internet was built for Unix.")

      The thing is, Windows networking is still very much its own proprietary setup, *very* different from the way the internet is set up, and it's *very* confusing for someone with prior experience mainly with TCP/IP and the internet. They use some of the same words, but they use them in different ways. For instance, a "domain" is not anything to do with DNS, but an authentication mechanism. However, when you "log on to" a domain, you are not then working on the domain controller server; you're still working on your local system, and your profile is stored on your local system, and everything is done on your local system. (I'm confused about whether even the authentication is done on the domain controller, since I appear to be able to log in to a domain even when the domain controller is physically powered down. This worries me, since I am concerned that information (such as a hash function result) about the password needed to log on as domain administrator may be distributed to the individual systems on the domain. I wish I knew how to find that out for sure, because if it's true it means one compromised workstation has quite serious implications for the PDC and the whole network.) If you want to actually log on (in the Unix/internet/TCP/IP sense) to the PDC, you use Remote Desktop or some other solution. It's all very confusing for someone who mostly knows internet stuff and standard protocols. If Microsoft ever develops an OS that *really* uses the standard internet protocols natively, ssl and so on, I think I'd get pretty excited.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  4. Remember Lynx and Mosaic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Remembr Lynx and mosaic, anyone? I still use Lynx under Windows and linux, though.

    1. Re:Remember Lynx and Mosaic? by jellomizer · · Score: 2, Informative

      While Lynx is cool and all I think it was because of the graphic capacity of the web that made it grow and killed of gopher.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Remember Lynx and Mosaic? by shokk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I remember Mosaic being the revolutionary web app, not Netscape! What's this crap? Selective memory, or purposeful revisionism to get AOL sponsorship $$$ for OSTG?

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    3. Re:Remember Lynx and Mosaic? by eowaraldur · · Score: 1

      Please don't tell me I'm the only one who still uses Mosaic.

    4. Re:Remember Lynx and Mosaic? by rubberbando · · Score: 1

      I remember lynx. :-)

      Surfing via dialup was/is sooo much faster going text only.

      Actually, now and then I switch to that mode in the latest version of Opera just for a little nostalga.

      --
      DEAD DEAD DEAD DELETE ME
    5. Re:Remember Lynx and Mosaic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they didnt mean much in the scheme of things.

      netscape brought it to critical mass...lynx didnt

    6. Re:Remember Lynx and Mosaic? by dextroz · · Score: 1
      Mod Mod Mod this guy up!!! He is very correct! NCSA Mosaic was the bright flash that started everything!

      I knew all those "free" AOL-Netscape CDs was upto no good!

      --
      Where's my free iPod!? Until then, I'll settle for a kiss...
    7. Re:Remember Lynx and Mosaic? by N3Roaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, gopher died because it was archaic and difficult to use. The Web, with or without graphics was much easier to use, especially once the early portals and search engines started popping up. It's the links from one site to another to another to another that killed gopher, not graphics.

      Granted, without graphics, the Web wouldn't have caught on nearly as well, particularly among corporations, but gopher would still have become one of those things that people don't notice on the Internet.

      --
      Remember RFC 873!
    8. Re:Remember Lynx and Mosaic? by blueZhift · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I remember reading so many Usenet articles by people seeking help to run Mosaic on various kinds of computers. Naturally I was curious, and once I saw and ran it for myself, and later Netscape (aka Netscrape), I thought Wow! For me, a physics grad at the time, being able to get text and data plots easily and quickly was revolutionary. Prior to the rise of easy to use graphical web browsers, you had to be privy to the sacred order of the preprint to get the latest research results. Mosaic changed all of that and in a lot of ways is one of the great pillars of my career today.

    9. Re:Remember Lynx and Mosaic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lemme guess, you were, like 7 when Mosaic became popular, right?

    10. Re:Remember Lynx and Mosaic? by wed128 · · Score: 1

      yep, just you.

    11. Re:Remember Lynx and Mosaic? by BackInIraq · · Score: 1

      No joke. While Netscape came and had the big IPO, Mosaic was the one that set the stage for them.

      Back in the day when inline pictures were a big deal.

    12. Re:Remember Lynx and Mosaic? by kalidasa · · Score: 2, Informative

      You realize, of course, that Netscape was the commercialization of Mosaic? And that the reason Fortune is focusing upon Netscape and not Mosaic is because they're, well, a business publication?

    13. Re:Remember Lynx and Mosaic? by wild_berry · · Score: 1

      Isn't Marc Andreesen credited with the tag?

      (The reference shows that it was an evil -- why not <Object> for any kind of extra inserted file? -- Andreesen did while at NCSA. The <Blink> tag was invented by Lou Montulli; additional reference if the wikipedia isn't sufficiently trustworthy).

    14. Re:Remember Lynx and Mosaic? by Jaruzel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My first experience of the WWW was finding the source of Mosaic on an FTP site and spending 2 days trying to compile the bugger under VMS/XTerm on a VaxStation. Finally did it though, and it was totally worth it. Ahhh those were the days. My regret now is that I totally ignored stuff like IRC, and missed on an era when it was actually useful.

      -Jar.

      --
      Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
    15. Re:Remember Lynx and Mosaic? by dlZ · · Score: 1

      I have fond memories of sneaking into the computer labs at Syracuse University and loading up Mosaic on the computers there.

      My favorite lab was this little Mac lab. The door to get in the building required a key card, but if you pulled on it hard it just opened, and security never kicked you out (they even let me in a few times when the door was being a real pain and they happened to be walking by.)

      --
      rm -rf ./evidence @ punkcomp
    16. Re:Remember Lynx and Mosaic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember being invited to Fermi-Lab to play on the internet.

      It was basicly a WTF is the internet group. It was made up of mostly kids my age (i think around 14 at the time)

      We basicly got to sit in a room and play on the damn internet using....MOSAIC. I remember being just mesmorized by all the "stuff" on there.

      Now its sad to see the magic the net once had be gone, its become old hat for most of us. But what we have at our fingertips is truly an astonishing accomplishment of man.

      Oh well enough of my reminiscing.

    17. Re:Remember Lynx and Mosaic? by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > While Lynx is cool and all I think it was because of the graphic
      > capacity of the web that made it grow and killed of gopher.

      Having graphics embedded in pages (as opposed to just at the end of a link, like gopher could do) may have accelerated it, but it would have happened anyway. The real genius of the web is that any part of any page can link to anything else on the internet (not just on the web); this made the web useful for creating cross-site topical indeces of, among other things, Gopher. (Yes, people used to create web-based indices that included Gopher links. Really. Granted, ftp links were much more common; I think about a third of Yahoo consisted of ftp links at one time. They linked to usenet also, and telnet sites, and TN3270, and other things.) The other way around wouldn't work: a gopher site couldn't serve as an index of other gopher sites, ftp, and the web. Then CGI-based search tools came along and made Archie look kludgy and painful by comparison, and the rest is history.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    18. Re:Remember Lynx and Mosaic? by Luteus · · Score: 1

      I installed in a couple months back for nostalgic reasons. It just doesn't do it for me any more. I still use lynx though, especially while installing. It's an easy way to read help documentation without having to run X.

    19. Re:Remember Lynx and Mosaic? by ao_coder · · Score: 1

      I remember getting a ppp connection specifically so that I could start using mosaic and drop lynx. Netscape doesn't deserve credit for inventing the web, but I will say that Netscape deserves a fair degree of credit for the difference between those top-to-bottom gray background+image sites that we enjoyed with mosaic to the current web experience. The developers at netscape contributed heavily to the innovation that occurred from 94-98 or so. By implementing tags that weren't yet standardized, introducing javascript support (although I still remember the hell of maintaining separate code bases for the different beta releases of javascript), and stylesheets- they really forced a vision on the industry. I think netscape may deserve credit for the first application servers as well, although I cant remember the exact sequence of app servers that came to market. Netscape isn't above reproach- they stole a lot from Mosaic, and didn't really play that nicely with the IEEE or WWWC, but I miss the rapid evolution they engendered. Is it just me, or does the web today look pretty much the same as the way it did the day IE5 took marketshare?

      --
      The best lack all convictions, while the worst Are full of passionate intensity. -Yeats, The Second Coming
    20. Re:Remember Lynx and Mosaic? by Rasputin · · Score: 1

      I remember the introduction of Mosaic too. Also remember that the Linux community almost lynched the developers for not releasing a Linux binary. ;)

      --
      "I once preached peaceful coexistence with Windows. You may laugh at my expense - I deserve it." Be's Jean-Louis Gass
    21. Re:Remember Lynx and Mosaic? by eowaraldur · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I use Opera as my main browser even though I have mosaic installed. On my computar machine, Mosaic is incapable of rendering most pages correctly. Google is rendered incorrectly, and on more complicated pages (such as Yahoo, /., and even its own home page), it just crashes. That's right, Mosaic can't even render its own home page.

    22. Re:Remember Lynx and Mosaic? by Creepy · · Score: 1

      yes - I remember lynx - I tried it before there was even a GUI (Mosaic) web browser and I thought that it was ugly and basically only usable for citing references in a bibliography. I didn't find it very easy to use either - it was on par with FTP and not nearly as useful (I didn't know you could link files at that point).

      Mosaic had a nice interface, but early on, at least, you had to find stuff by following links, and I don't remember finding any search engines (crawlers) or portals until netscape was nearly out. Mosaic, at that time, seemed hideously slow for finding and downloading stuff, and Netscape seemed much faster. I think Netscape thread loaded images and rendered the text first, even back then.

      I recall the beta and later released version of Netscape seemed so much better than Mosaic but I no longer remember the exact specifics on why. I remember reading the hype on trn (thread read news) and wanting to try it, but my attempt to download it that first morning kept failing because of an overloaded FTP server (if I recall correctly, it went live about 2AM my time and I was up late playing a MUD in the computer lab with a bunch of friends, and we finally got the browser to download about 6AM), so not everyone trying to download the beta was from Australia.

      Mosaic to me wanted to be to lynx what the GUI version of Gopher was to the text version of Gopher. Netscape wanted to be much more.

  5. What did happen to Constellation? by Saiyine · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Do you remember when it was announced that in Netscape were developing their very own OS?

    --
    Hosting 20G hd, 1Tb bw! ssh $7.95
    1. Re:What did happen to Constellation? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Do you remember when it was announced that in Netscape were developing their very own OS?

      I don't remember anything of the sort. What I do remember was that Netscape was seen as a cross-OS platform of APIs upon which applications could be built. Looking at how things panned out for Netscape, that seems a little odd these days, but its successor Mozilla (not to be confused with the original Netscape codename) has succeeded where Netscape failed. Even using just the standards compliant HTML/CSS/JavaScript environment, very powerful applications can be based on Mozilla. If you take a leap, XUL and other supporting Mozilla technologies can be leveraged for an even more powerful experience.

    2. Re:What did happen to Constellation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a quick Google search found this article: http://www.windowsitpro.com/Article/ArticleID/1681 5/16815.html?Ad=1

      looks like vapourware

    3. Re:What did happen to Constellation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Netscape is shooting for a June beta of "Constellation," the company's next-generation Web client. Constellation is a desktop replacement for Windows that provides an interface called HomePort, a personal workspace. HomePort is "location independent" meaning that a user could log-on to his or her workspace from any machine and get the same desktop interface, complete with bookmarks, shortcuts, and their choice of live feeds."
      http://www.windowsitpro.com/Article/ArticleID/1681 5/16815.html?Ad=1

  6. Cern by Nissyen · · Score: 5, Informative

    How about Cern and Tim Berners-Lee? The initial Netscape release was basically the same as NCSA Mosaic which came before it.

    1. Re:Cern by jmp_nyc · · Score: 1

      Of course, and they were building on the idea of distributed information browsed via hypertext which wowed us all in Gopher. Remember back in the early 90's when Gopher seemed like the coolest thing ever? Of course, it took a GUI (thanks to Mosaic) for hypertext to catch on...
      -JMP

    2. Re:Cern by Nissyen · · Score: 1

      I loved gopher... some university, I think San Diego, had a bunch of 80s music stored as 8kHz au files. I remember listening to The Safety Dance alot. Wait a minute... that explains what made me the way I am today! Damn you Men Without Hats!!!!

    3. Re:Cern by cbv · · Score: 1

      The original browser (already including a built-in editor), written by Tim on a NeXT, had a real stupid name: WorldWideWeb.app ;-)

      It was later renamed to Nexus.app.

    4. Re:Cern by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

      How about Cern and Tim Berners-Lee? The initial Netscape release was basically the same as NCSA Mosaic which came before it.

      Ask the non-geeks around you if they know what Mosaic is. Then ask them when they started using "Netscape".

      Mosaic did it first, yes. But Netscape made the interweb a popular place to be.

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    5. Re:Cern by cshotton · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Yeah, this Fortune article is definitely revisionist history, drawn up by some of the people that capitalized on a lot of hard work by others. I know, I was there. I spent a LOT of time in late '91 and most of 1992 corresponding with Robert Cailliau, who was responsible for much of the work on the CERN server/browser combo that predated anything done at NCSA. We at Univ. of Texas were interested in getting scientific papers on-line and had found Gopher to be a train wreck when it came to managing scientific notations, footnotes, and bibliographic references. The guys at CERN had solved the problem for text with the work Tim Berners-Lee had done with HTML and the networking code others at CERN had created for HTTP.

      I originally contacted Robert and TB-L about writing a browser for the Mac. They said they'd rather see a server, which is how MacHTTP was born. Once the Mac server was running, I started working with Aleks Totic at NCSA to get the early versions of Mosaic on the Mac to work with the same server. Another prominent figure at NCSA at the time was Tom Redman, who if I recall correctly, was leading the Mosaic effort. At the time, Andressen was just another programmer on the Mosaic effort who had some glory because he hacked up the first working image tag in HTML. Until that time, everything had been text and hyperlinks

      Long story short, everyone knew that Andressen snuck out of town with the Mosaic source code, and a few weeks later lured several of the developers like Aleks to go with him. There was a lot of ill-will engendered by that move and it wasn't all sweetness and light as the Fortune article would have you believe.

      I remember speaking to the NCSA team (and then the SpyGlass team) many times afterwards, and no one ever really got over the fact that a junior programmer walked out the door with the IP created by dozens of other people and got filthy rich out of it while many of the people who built the original World Wide Web labored on in obscurity. At the time, the Internet culture wasn't about getting rich. It was about creating cool technology and sharing it with others, and almost all of the innovative stuff was still coming out of academia.

      If anything, Netscape was the prototypical example of how to swipe someone elses' good ideas, rebrand them, and get rich. That was the company's real legacy to the Internet and the subsequent DotCom lunacy.

      --

      Shut up and eat your vegetables!!!
    6. Re:Cern by Tirjasdyn · · Score: 1

      "If anything, Netscape was the prototypical example of how to swipe someone elses' good ideas, rebrand them, and get rich. "

      I thought that was microsoft...

    7. Re:Cern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a former Spyglass developer/lead from early 95 through 97, I can say the Netscape story has always been clogged with revisionist history. I was perhaps too close to one side to have an unbiased point of view, but I spend many long nights trying to unravel the C**P Objective C code the original NCSA Mosaic code was written in. If I recall correctly, one function in the text parser was over 50 pages printed -- one entry, dozens of returns, and way nested switch statements. That's just one example. The code generally sucked.

      On the other hand, it allowed a lot of people to do things they had never known they could do, and they were willing to install software built the night before and crash with every few minutes of usage.

      I knew the WWW was mainstream when a guy on my team came into the office after lunch and announced a URL was printed on his McDonald's bag (thanks John).

    8. Re:Cern by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 1

      everyone knew that Andressen snuck out of town with the Mosaic source code

      He probably just FTP'd it like everyone else.

    9. Re:Cern by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      as with all ceos and junior engineers that got rich, they have made nothing else since and may be rich still but are never going to do anything usefull in their lives....

      At least us real engineers can still claim we kept on inventing/developing cool new stuff.

      At least IE still has this in its about box

      "Based on NCSA Mosaic. NCSA Mosaic(TM); was developed at the National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"

      Nothing of the sort in firefox.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    10. Re:Cern by dirtyboot · · Score: 1

      no, microsoft stole that idea like all their other ideas.

    11. Re:Cern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      firefox needs no such thing. it's not based on Mosaic at all. that's like requiring Opera to say such nonsense.

  7. Quiet Article by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Andreessen: I lined up interviews and took a programming job at a company in Palo Alto. I liked the idea of moving someplace that wasn't so cold. The Valley was kind of dormant then. Apple Computer was the walking dead.

    The more things change, the more they stay the same. :-)

  8. Ahem... Mosaic by rueger · · Score: 2, Informative

    Let's not forget Mosaic, upon which Netscape was built.

    Still, I havea great fondness for the big, pulsing, waiting for 56K dial up N that was Netscape in the early days.

    1. Re:Ahem... Mosaic by bedroll · · Score: 2, Informative
      Let's not forget Mosaic, upon which Netscape was built.

      As was IE. The humor of it is that, as I recall, most of the programmers responsible for Mosaic were the ones to originally create Netscape. So, if IE was started by building off of Mosaic's roots then those programmers helped Microsoft destroy Netscape.

      Then there was Mosaic 2.0, which was just a little less horrible than IE 2.0.. but that's another story.

    2. Re:Ahem... Mosaic by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      56k? Thats lightning fast man, i am still using my 2400 baud modem with 9600 fax capabilities.

      On a real note, who gets 56k dialup? I have never experienced true 56k dialup no matter where i lived. At best I have got around 48k, mostly it was 32 or 28k. Yes I had the 56k modems but the lines were not providing me with that speed.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    3. Re:Ahem... Mosaic by deanj · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Let's not forget Imposter Boy:

      http://web.archive.org/web/20030212202753/http://w ww.chrispy.net/marca/gqarticle.html ....Unless you want to believe the marketing goons at Netscape.

      Kinda odd that the guy that was supposed to have written Mosaic single-handedly didn't write ANY code at Netscape.

    4. Re:Ahem... Mosaic by Precipitous · · Score: 1

      waiting for 56K dial up
      I remember how I'd explain the internet to peers and co-workers in the 1990's. Along with the technical instruction, I'd advise them to bring a magazine to read while waiting for pages to load.

      --
      My motto: "A cat is no trade for integrity."
    5. Re:Ahem... Mosaic by going_the_2Rpi_way · · Score: 1

      As I recall, you had the option of either using a standard phone line or getting 'data' phone lines in those days at a slightly higher cost from the phone companies. Might've been a scam most places, but who knows.

    6. Re:Ahem... Mosaic by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget Mosaic, upon which Netscape was built.

      And IE.

      Still, I havea great fondness for the big, pulsing, waiting for 56K dial up N that was Netscape in the early days.

      Hmm, you had 56K "in the early days" with pulsing Ns? The rest of us had much slower connections.

    7. Re:Ahem... Mosaic by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      Heh, I got a 128k (2 channel) isdn connection when 14k4 modems where still the thing...

      The throughput and latency of it were just mindboggling at the time..

      Now that I think of it, there are probably quite a few places on the planet where that would still qualify as broadband.

      Seems isdn was rather expensive in many places back then.. here it was about twice as expensive as a normal analog line, and my isp back then was just starting experimental support for it, and did not charge anything on top of a normal subscription for it. It was however about 8 times as fast as the fastest analog dialup connection, not to mention the latency decrease due to eliminating modems and their buffering (was very relevant for me as a big time telnet user... muds and such ruled :)

    8. Re:Ahem... Mosaic by asliarun · · Score: 1

      Sorry if i'm not too fond of Netscape. Back in the dotcom daze, most of us "web programmers" would typically spend half our time in developing web pages, and the other half in getting the damn thing to work in Netscape, especially fancy Javascript/DHTML and table/image alignment. Ok, Netscape did have a javascript console but that was about it. Then, there would be all the graphics designers sitting on top of our heads, asking us to reformat the entire table structure just because one lousy column was not displaying "just so" in Netscape and would spoil the gestalt of the page or some such. Then, we would change one itty-bitty column width from a number to a percentage which would, for some reason, screw up the entire goddamn page! Sigh.

      I'm just an old dotcom fart rambling though, so take my rant with a pinch of salt :-)

    9. Re:Ahem... Mosaic by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "Heh, I got a 128k (2 channel) isdn connection when 14k4 modems where still the thing...
      The throughput and latency of it were just mindboggling at the time..
      Now that I think of it, there are probably quite a few places on the planet where that would still qualify as broadband."

      That's what really made me mad about Pacific Bell (now SBC) here in California. In 1986, my Atari 1040ST supported ISDN natively. Did Pacific Bell deply residential service? No. It wasn't until after 1996 that they did half-heartedly, and by that time, the word on the street was "wait for cable modems or DSL." Pac Bell even tried to charge peak minutes usage on ISDN. And thus they were never successful in getting residential customers to move off 56K and onto ISDN. Its a shame they had such stupid management.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    10. Re:Ahem... Mosaic by CharlieHedlin · · Score: 1

      I had 56k with Mosaic just before Netscape. It was a leased line connection.

      My first home Internet access was at 14.4k.

    11. Re:Ahem... Mosaic by Banner · · Score: 1

      Excellent link. This explains why some people I used to work with hated this guy so. I had never heard the full story.

    12. Re:Ahem... Mosaic by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      The real problem for me was the fact that netscape supported DIVS and Tables, but not TABLES in TABLES, while IE supported TABLES in TABLES, but not DIVs.

      Life sucked ass.

    13. Re:Ahem... Mosaic by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      Man I remember getting on the "net" back in the day...

      A friend at school told me about it and I went home to try it out. First, I had to get the TCP/IP stack for Windows (3.1) - but once I had that I had to get more stuff. My buddy told me to get "netscape" so I found it on my ISP's dial-up shell and Zmodem'd it on down the pipe.

      At 2400 baud it took about an hour (I believe it took just 56 minutes) and the download had to be restarted twice. Another version (1.0) was released a few days later and then I had to download that as well. By then however I received a 9600 modem from my uncle so it would be less painful this time.

      It took a long time for me to realize what I was getting into. My family still doesn't understand the huge-ness of what happened in my grandfather's den that day (my grandfather I might add still uses Netscape 4). Little do they understand that I put them into the 21st century without much fanfare. I took them from the days where BBS's ruled and into a time where anything they want is at their fingertips.

    14. Re:Ahem... Mosaic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This explains why some people I used to work with hated this guy so. I had never heard the full story.

      I'd say you still haven't heard the full story. This hack job just dredges up a bunch of resentment from jealous rivals who didn't make the big killing that Andreesen did. So what if Dave Thompson showed Andreesen a web browser, then Andreesen went out and bootlegged a project to build his own? That doesn't mean that Thompson would have started Netscape, or even added image tags to Mosaic. Sour grapes all.

  9. IPO's by ChrisF79 · · Score: 1

    "...where few people have even heard of IPOs." Are you kidding me? I wouldn't say "few people." That might be when you were introduced to IPO's but I think most of the world had heard of IPO's long before. Perhaps since you're a tech guy, the tech IPO's are what brought it to your attention, but I think most other business folks had heard about them long before.

    --
    Finance tutorials and more! Understandfinance
    1. Re:IPO's by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

      What about LBO's. The RJR deal is still studied in finance programs as very innovative. It lead to Malcom Glazier pissing off 1/2 the world with his Manchester United purchase. Lol, soccer nuts. I wish those people that have been paying next to nothing for their Man U tickets had to buy tickets to a college football event to see how much they were underpaying. Not to mention pro football. Jesus I couldn't afford them making over 60k/year.

    2. Re:IPO's by fa2k · · Score: 1

      Maybe i'm too young, but I had to google it ;)

  10. Dear Slashdot by dan+dan+the+dna+man · · Score: 3, Funny

    I already waste enough time at work reading your hallowed pages. Pointing me to 20 page articles is not helping my productivity one bit. Now I've commented I'll RTFA for a while, maybe comment again in 20 minutes time ;)

    --
    I don't read your sig, why do you read mine?
    1. Re:Dear Slashdot by Gill+Bates · · Score: 1

      Here, try this one. Only one page.

  11. Good Ole Days by teiresias · · Score: 4, Funny

    Picture a world without Google, without eBay or Amazon or broadband, where few people have even heard of IPOs. That was reality just a decade ago.


    No or less newbs. Far less spam. Fewer viruses.

    *sniff* The good ole days.

    The company that changed it--bringing us into the Internet age--was a brilliant flash in the pan called Netscape

    Bastards!

    //Although in the "good ole days", there was only dial-up, extremely bad streaming video (if at all), and AOL ruled supreme. Thanks Netscape ;)

    --
    -Teiresias
    1. Re:Good Ole Days by ajs · · Score: 1
      "No or less newbs. Far less spam. Fewer viruses.

      *sniff* The good ole days.
      "

      And lots of rose-tinted glasses....

      Do you recall:If you don't then you're either young or deluding yourself into thinking the world got ugly all of a sudden.
    2. Re:Good Ole Days by Takara · · Score: 2, Informative
      The company that changed it--bringing us into the Internet age--was a brilliant flash in the pan called Netscape

      Bastards!

      The "Internet age" you're thinking of happened in 1997 along with Windows 98... That's where the noobs came from.

    3. Re:Good Ole Days by cablepokerface · · Score: 1

      No or less newbs

      It's "newbie" or "noob" you n00b!

    4. Re:Good Ole Days by RetroGeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      AOL ruled supreme

      No, that would be CompuServe. If you wanted to reach company information, message boards, CompuServe was the way to go. They had local MODEM numbers in every major city.

      And they are still around, though on the WWW.

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    5. Re:Good Ole Days by jedidiah · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Morris worm was a flash in the pan compared to the neverending parade of WinDOS remote exploits and email/word/excel viruses. The Morris worm inspired Unix vendors to change their habits. Microsoft seems immune from the pressures that make most companies fix their screwups.

      Back when everyone had to worry about link and boot sector viruses, you would get laughed off the board for suggesting something like an email virus.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    6. Re:Good Ole Days by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      ...and AOL ruled supreme.

      Huh? I remember that when AOL unleashed its users onto the Usenet there were howls and whines because of all the newbs. I believe this was still in the days before the green card lawyers...but not too many days before.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    7. Re:Good Ole Days by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      The Good Ole Days? YES.

      We had Webcrawler a decade ago. It was THE Google since there wasn't a competitor yet. Then AOL ate it and people immediately fled to a new contender Altavista (and dejanews for USENET searches).

      I remember dumping Netscape as soon as AOL got it's filthy hands on it.

      I didn't come back until Firefox.

      On another 'golden years' note: It's sad that until 1993 I had my phone number and po box mailing address in my USENET .sig in case someone wanted to contact me. By spring 1994 I had to start hiding my email address as well.

      In 1995 I started using 'x-no-archive' in my USENET posts to disarm Trolls from posting some twisted version of something I'd said the year before.

      sigh

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
    8. Re:Good Ole Days by bjohnson · · Score: 1

      actually it wasn't AOL, ironically, that did this, it was GE-Compuserve.

      AOL actually learned from Compuserve's error (just dumping all its users into that thar intarnet with no preparation) and did a fair bit of netiqutte education ("Don't do this, it'll get you YELLED AT")...which minimized their impact somewhat.

      Of course, anyone who'd been on the net before that had survived the shock the advent of Eternal September.

      And I STILL hold a grudge against those damn Green Card lawyerturds.

    9. Re:Good Ole Days by ajs · · Score: 1

      "The Morris worm was a flash in the pan compared to the neverending parade of WinDOS remote exploits"

      That's very nice, but has nothing to do with the point at hand, which was recalling that the coming of Netscape's browser did not portent a sea change in the quality of the Internet experience. That process began and continued from the mid-80s on, as more and more people became aware of the Internet. With every new (and larger) influx of users, the signal-to-noise ratio of the Net dropped. Only recently has that ratio begun to swing in the other direction as technology has begun to catch up and allow for collaboration modes where noise is reduced in a decnetralized way (e.g. Slashdot's user-moderation (it's hard to think of Slashdot as low-noise, but compare browsing at 3 on Slashdot to your average Yahoo Messageboard without user-moderation), MediaWiki's user-watchlist / reversion / admin features, etc).

  12. Ah, the internet. by millennial · · Score: 1

    When I first got online, the Web didn't exist yet. I was in elementary school, and my advanced studies teacher was helping me learn about computers. I remember sending an e-mail over a 300bps modem, from the only internet-capable computer in our school. This was back in the days when I programmed in BASIC on an Apple IIgs (IIe?).

    I find it unfortunate that I never got into the BBS scene - moreso, that I didn't know it existed. When I got my first modem-equipped computer, the modem sat unused until we eventually got dial-up internet service. Nowadays I enjoy telnetting into some newer BBSes, but it's just not the same...

    --
    I am scientifically inaccurate.
    1. Re:Ah, the internet. by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1

      Ditto that. I recall years ago on the IIGS when our family had software/a modem that would access an online encyclopedia, since the internet had yet to take off. Between that and our scanner that popped into the old imagewriter that could take low-res monochrome scans, we had an unstoppable beast....

      --
      In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
    2. Re:Ah, the internet. by dvicci · · Score: 1

      Obligatory "me too." I remember being kept awake by my father's modem in high school. It was attached to a //e (128KB RAM and an add on 10MB HD -- Woo Hoo!). Either you couldn't disable the handshaking sounds, or he didn't bother. At the time, it never occurred to me, but I could have been trading all my gamez over BBS rather than at school on 5.25" at school. Who knows what else I would have become involved in, or how my computing knowledge would have developed.

      Had I only known... it wasn't until 6 years later at college that I started realizing the potential of networked computing.

      --
      ] D
    3. Re:Ah, the internet. by Hachey · · Score: 1

      I remember when the internet for me consisted of the Berkeley Mac Users Group (Now PlanetMUG) - a local BBS. People sharing icon collections, sound clips, game demos and postings about how the hell to use RESedit.

      Those were the good old days, before spyware and major spam. Back in those days everyone was just trying to help out everyone else. The community the internet once had, which meant general positive regard for most people you met - is no longer.


      --
      Check out the Uncyclopedia.org :
      The only wiki source for politically incorrect non-information about things like Kitten Huffing and Pong! the Movie !

      --
      Please allow me to hate the creator of the 120-character limit: *HATES*. Thank you.
    4. Re:Ah, the internet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, stfu. Isn't everyone tired of these "Back in my day" stories?

  13. What a change by mfloy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sometimes we don't even realize what a change 10 years can make to our lives. I can't even not being able to use the internet for news, chat, shoppings, research, etc. The only unfortunate part is that Netscape has been hit by the Microsoft Monopoly and is a shell of it's former glory.

    1. Re:What a change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't even not being able to use the internet for news, chat, shoppings, research, etc.

      You also forgot to type the word 'remember'. ;)

    2. Re:What a change by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      Carcass is a better term.

    3. Re:What a change by BRock97 · · Score: 1

      Netscape has been hit by the Microsoft Monopoly

      You know, this comment is such crap. If you want to know why Netscape lost the browser war, go back and use the 4.x series. They were horrible. Where as Internet Explorer would render the page on the fly, Netscape 4.x would wait for ages. Additionally, it would love to leave rogue processes running in the background and the only indication that there was a problem was that the current browser window wouldn't render past the first few lines of HTML. By that time, Netscape was Netscape's own worse enemy. I knew scores of die hard 'liberal' software thinkers that were forced to recommend IE over Netscape, just because Netscape blew. Now, I am not saying that the big M's monopolistic practices didn't affect Netscape, but don't defend crap software by citing the horrors of Microsoft.

      --

      Bryan R.
      The price of freedom is eternal vigilance, or $12.50 as seen on eBay.....
  14. Not netscape. by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wouldn't give netscape the credit for the birth of the web. I would give Netscape credit for the .COM bubble, and making the web well known. But it is more of an issue of the right place at the right time. Modems have gotten fast enough to display bitmapped graphics, at a reasionable speed. Most people had 8 bit color at 640x480 displays, and the OS's and Computers were powerful enough to run a multitasking windowed environment. I think if netscape wan't there Mosaic may have stayed the big dog for Browsers untill microsoft wanted a piece of the action. It would be fair to say the Netscape help popularized the web, not threw anything really technical, but because it gave wallstreet a look at what the internet combined with html can promice, thus giving advertising time to the internet.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Not netscape. by fermion · · Score: 1
      The birth of the web and the internet was, of course, something that happened in the ivory towers of academia. And those of us that were fortunate enough to be there got the first taste, with mosiac and the like.

      What Netscape did was to provide a more polished browser and a credible bussiness plan of what we would now call web based services. It was a very fast exploitation as the web had only been announced as available to everyone for a year. Netscape bussinesses to deliver to a consistent standard, as they do now with IE. In fact until MS bought a browser product and retargeted it, Netscape provided the base that all dot com live on, and those that are most succesful still tend to code to more widely available standards.

      So, netscape allowed bussiness to be done on the web. Amazon, Ebay, and the rest got wall street excited. Nescape could not surivive as a browser or server maker with MS pratically giving it away, and I still don't know how Amazon is making it, as they seem to lost money on every order.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    2. Re:Not netscape. by kuzb · · Score: 1

      No, Netscape lost it's market share because at the time when it really mattered, they produced a vastly inferior product. Ask any web developer that had to deal with Netscape 4.x how much fun their job was due to Netscape.

      Netscape cut it's own throat, and by the time they came back with something that didn't suck (Netscape 6+) it was too late to recover. People had lost faith in the Netscape name.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    3. Re:Not netscape. by DirkDaring · · Score: 1

      You are correct. I've been a web designer for a long time, and I have always hated designing for netscape. With IE I could design just about whatever I wanted in Photoshop, break it apart and make it work in IE. With Netscape it was a lot of teeth pulling and redesigns.

    4. Re:Not netscape. by that+_evil+_gleek · · Score: 1

      As I recall most viewed netscape simply as an upgrade to mosaic, and the details being trivial, if you used mosaic before, you used netscape after. IE's about dialog states "based on NCSA Mosaic", at least on the version that came with Apples
      before Safari, don't know if it still does.. Really, I'd say Mosaic popularized the web. Of course, Berner's Lee invented it,
      (props) but unless you had NextStep, the browsers displayed images on external viewers ( xv , etc ) , instead of in the page, and other wierd user interface stuff, which still beat gopher, which I learned to use only a few monthes before, just in time to see it go, but I'd say the popularizer of the web was Mosaic, if you consider Netscape and IE to be it's children.
      (bastards, perhaps ;-)

    5. Re:Not netscape. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Define long time. n < 15 is not significant. Most who learned to design for IE, like most who learned to code on anything MS, has a terrible hard time following best practices. This is not a troll, just an observation.

      Do yourself a favor. Read the old books that taught how to program, not just put widgets up on the screen and conenct to data sources.

  15. Mosaic? by meckardt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The company that changed it--bringing us into the Internet age--was a brilliant flash in the pan called Netscape.

    How about Mosaic? I admit that Netscape was a big step forward, but it was evolutionary, rather than revolutionary.

    1. Re:Mosaic? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Henry Ford didn't invent the automobile, either. (Nor, BTW, did he invent the assembly line.) And the Model T wasn't the first car he produced. But when he did ...

      So it seems kind of like that. Before Netscape, the Web was an interesting idea, with some modest success, but basically the domain of hobbyists with a high tolerance for quirks. And the first release of the Netscape browser (the "Navigator" name didn't come until a couple years later, IIRC, but someone please tell me if I'm wrong) wasn't all that much of an improvement over Mosaic. But with a little refinement, they hit the sweet spot, in much the same way Ford did, with a product that worked for damn near everybody.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    2. Re:Mosaic? by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      How about Mosaic? I admit that Netscape was a big step forward, but it was evolutionary, rather than revolutionary.

      The details are fuzzy in my head, but back then I used Mosaic as the first graphical web browser. It sucked. It wasn't able do concurrently download text and images at the same time (or even multiple images concurrently). It would suck down the HTML, and then at the bottom status bar it would say something like "Downloading images...", while you waited. I believe that Netscape was more powerful from the get go in terms of features like this. Revolutionary, probably not, but much more useful than Mosaic was.

      Oh, and for those that don't know, most of the Netscape guys were Mosaic defectors.

      The thing I liked most about Netscape, was that they made a browser for every platform under the Sun. They had almost something like 20 ports of their product. I know of no other GUI application that can claim that. For so long it was the only viable browser for Linux. It sucked when the web went more IE-centric.

      Oh, and people bash Netscape for the <blink/> tag. Well, IMHO, it has gotten _much_ worse with animated gifs and flash advertisements.

    3. Re:Mosaic? by bonk · · Score: 1

      I'm almost certain that the blink and maraquee tags were IE introductions, not Netscape.

      --
      I hope to die peacefully in my sleep like grandpa, not screaming like his passengers.
    4. Re:Mosaic? by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1
      Well, how about Viola? It was the first X11 based browser I am aware of. Of course, there was Cello in the PC world.

      There were as well text browsers - the first of which displayed the text of the web site with numbers for the links. You'd type in the number of the link you wanted to visit. It was a far cry from today's "links" browser.

      Netscape did bring the web, and thereby the internet, to the "masses" - people who weren't completely involved in the computer world before - and therefore should be recognised. I suppose, grudgingly, that soemwhere down the road MS IE should also be recognised for bringing the unwashed masses on board too.

      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
    5. Re:Mosaic? by Bedouin+X · · Score: 1

      I am totally certain that the blink tag was a Netscape "innovation." Marquee was just Microsoft wanting catch up with Netscape in functionality as well as annoyance.

      --
      Dissolve... Resolve... Evolve...
  16. Cello... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cello predated a lot of what Mozilla/Netscape was doing... I remember it as 'low hassle' 16 bit Windows app.

  17. picture a world.... by Sonicboom · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Picture a world without Google, without eBay or Amazon or broadband,..."

    and I remember a world where I had an email box that had NO spam in it, and a USENET with little to no spam... where porn was in alt.binaries.* and NOT in comp.*.... and posts were ON TOPIC.

    OTOH - it was also a world without /.

    I'd like to turn back time.

    --
    [Connection closed by foreign host]
    1. Re:picture a world.... by tedgyz · · Score: 3, Informative

      Don't you remember the original spammer?

      BIFF BIFF BIFF bIff Biff bIFF
      BIFF
      BIFF BIFF
      BIFF BIFF BIFF
      BIFF BIFF BIFF BIFF
      BIFF BIFF BIFF BIFF BIFF
      BIFF BIFF BIFF BIFF BIFF BIFF

      I remember seeing his posts all over the newsgroups "back in the day". If nothing else, he was creative.

      --
      "No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
    2. Re:picture a world.... by caluml · · Score: 1
      where porn was in alt.binaries.*

      It still is, you know. Obviously, you have to weed out all spam, but filesize is a pretty good filter.

    3. Re:picture a world.... by greed · · Score: 5, Informative

      He and kibo were just spool-greppers, not spammers. Annoying, but easy enough to filter.

      Most of my "stupid posting" filtering used to be done by rejecting any message which did not have a lowercase letter in Subject:. Worked great until I got a job at IBM with all those old mono-case mainframe programmers. (You can decide if I'm talking about the mainframes or the programmers being old.)

      You want to remember spam, how about Green Card Lottery from Canter & Siegel?

      Heck, that was back when people talked about "EMP" (excessive multi-posting) or "ECP" (excessive cross-posting) on USENET, and "UCE" (unsolicited commercial e-mail) for, uh... e-mail I suppose.

      Spam originally referred to USENET postings, in honor of those Monty Python vikings who just won't shut up about it--the C&S postings were like that, everywhere you went, there was another damn green card lottery posting....

      But that was after the start of Eternal September. (Now that AOL has dropped USENET, is it finally October?) And those of us who complained when Prodigy got 'net access sure looked back fondly when AOL hooked up.

      Remember when the worst thing about USENET was a few kooks and badly-configured FIDO BBS doors?

      Yeah, me neither, my memory's not what it used to be.

      I do remember being shown this neat thing on one of those fancy Sun SPARCStations with the built-in ISDN connection where you could look at a page of text from an information service, and it would be able to have pictures and full-motion video integrated into it! Even over ISDN it took a while to load up, and the video (MPEG 1) got all blurry if there was a lot of movement, and it pretty much swamped the SPARCStation....

      It was summer of 1992 and they didn't really have a name for it yet. It was like gopher, but with graphics, too.

      They (Northern Telecom's research division) also had a prototype of a new wireless phone from Motorola--it would work with their wireless set-up for private branch exchanges (Meridians). But the cool thing was, it had a flip-down thing like a Star Trek communicator.

    4. Re:picture a world.... by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      But that was after the start of Eternal September. (Now that AOL has dropped USENET, is it finally October?) And those of us who complained when Prodigy got 'net access sure looked back fondly when AOL hooked up.

      I remember when AOL gave it's clients USENET access. That very day their USENET servers screwed up and re-posted every single article ~7 times. AOL SAYS 'HI INTERNET WE'RE HERE'!!!

      AOL then allowed easy access to every single newsgroup (but one) and did two very Evil things.

      First: It filtered out one newsgroup from it's list alt.aol-sucks (renamed Flames And Complaints About AOL and only accessible by looking for it that way) and Second: Made alt.best.of.the.internet one of the default newsgroup to post to.

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
  18. I remember the Netscape release .. by torpor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    .. I'd just helped start up a (what is now very large) ISP in Los Angeles, and we were having a blast (i kid) helping people get the Trumpet Winsock Dialler and some 3rd-party TCP/IP stack installed on their Windows 3.0 and 3.1/WFW machines .. 'real TCP/IP access' was one of the major draws to us as an ISP, and for the first few weeks we had about 15 new signups a day.

    Then Mosaic went "Netscape", and suddenly, literally in a matter of one week, it was like 100 signups a day... just so people could get into this new-fangled "GUI"-style info resource they'd heard about in WIRED and Mondo2000 and BoingBoing magazines ... phew. We nearly melted down, but I'm glad to say I really had a unique opportunity to see this turning point from the perspective of a major ISP .. which is still around, and has grown a lot since those humble days with 20 14.4k modems and 10 28.8k modems, sitting on a Livingston rack, hanging off a single 56k line ..

    Ah, the web. What would the Internets be without you now, eh? A massive landscape of gopher piles and archie bookmarks, no doubt .. no doubt .. /pours one on the ground for the poor suckers still in the ISP business ...

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  19. I fondly remember... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the days prior to Netscape.
    13 years old, armed with Commodore 64, tape drive, 9" b&w tv, and armfuls of magazines like these computer classics.

  20. Myopic vision by tedgyz · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'll never forget when the Lead Engineer of our team at HP looked at Mosaic / WWW and said, "Who needs that?" This guy was supposed to be the "visionary" for management, but he definitely had his head in the sand.

    If nothing else, you think he would appreciate the ease of getting pr0n. Cobbling together alt.binary... threads was state-of-the-art back then. :-)

    --
    "No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
    1. Re:Myopic vision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He may be one of the few people that have a mutated gene that prevents them from ever being myopic. I know 1 person like that.

    2. Re:Myopic vision by gosand · · Score: 1
      I'll never forget when the Lead Engineer of our team at HP looked at Mosaic / WWW and said, "Who needs that?" This guy was supposed to be the "visionary" for management, but he definitely had his head in the sand.

      I was a senior in college, and one of my fellow CS students was doing his final project on this thing called the World Wide Web, or WWW for short. "How stupid." I thought "Why would anyone need that, when gopher and FTP works just fine? There are BBSes. I just don't get it."

      Of course, as you can see, I was quite the visionary too. I also didn't understand why anyone would make such a complicated OS like Unix.

      But to be fair, the WWW at the time sucked pretty bad. In my first job at Motorola, I received an award a couple of years later for being one of a few people who pushed and pushed and got our intranet configured. Some management fought it at first, seeing it as unproductive. We were using Mosaic on Unix workstations. It was all very covert at first because they didn't want people wasting time at work. They certainly didn't see the need for an intranet. There was a lot of concern about people being able to get to the internet too, so we had to deal with that.

      I think it is kind of cool to have been there when it all kind of started. It is also really interesting to see how far we have come with it in such a short amount of time.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    3. Re:Myopic vision by FhnuZoag · · Score: 1

      Nobody needs pr0n.

    4. Re:Myopic vision by tedgyz · · Score: 1

      Nobody needs the internet.

      Civilization is the limitless multiplication of unnecessary necessities. -- Mark Twain

      --
      "No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
  21. Tim Berners-Lee by an_mo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why do people talk about Netscape so much and forget that one person only, Tim Berners-Lee, invented the web? He code the first browser, the first web server, invented html, convinced CERN to keep it free and open. And yet, when you tell the average educated guy that there is one person that did all this, they find it hard to believe. I just can't understand why Andreesen is more popular than Berners-Lee.

  22. Imposter Boy by deanj · · Score: 5, Informative
    The world has always gotten this whole myth about how Mosaic was created from the Netscape people themselves. It's just like the myth that eBay was started because someone wanted to sell Pez containers, or any of the rest of the Silicon Valley myths. Marketing it that way makes a good story.


    The only article you can find on what happened with NCSA Mosaic was in a GQ article from 1997. It's called Imposter Boy, and can be found here:

    http://web.archive.org/web/20030212202753/http://w ww.chrispy.net/marca/gqarticle.html

    Call it sour grapes, or whatever you want, but I defy you to find any other articles about what happened back in those days... you can't. It's all because of the spin that Netscape put on it.

    1. Re:Imposter Boy by OakDragon · · Score: 1

      I would like to read the article you mentioned, but have been advised by my attorney to restrain myself (http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/07/13/0 527236&tid=95&tid=17)

  23. Same tired knee-jerk comment... by KingSkippus · · Score: 5, Informative

    1) The article isn't about the invention of the Internet, it is about the invention of the World Wide Web.

    2) How many times do we have to hear the joke about Al Gore claiming to invent the Internet? It's a myth that Al Gore ever claimed to have anything to do with the technical design of the Internet. He did indeed, however, have a large role in providing the environment in which it became the "Information Superhighway" that it is today.

    1. Re:Same tired knee-jerk comment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure the author made it as a cliche'd joke, like "I, for one, would like to welcome our ant overlords," even though I doubt Kent Brockman really believed it.

      On the other hand, your ideas are intriguing to me, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

    2. Re:Same tired knee-jerk comment... by Forthan+Red · · Score: 3, Funny

      You'll have to forgive him. He can't help his grossly inaccurate views. He watches Fox News.

    3. Re:Same tired knee-jerk comment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess, you watch the pinnical of reputable news, CBS.

      How many documents do you want to forge today?

    4. Re:Same tired knee-jerk comment... by RealProgrammer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The reason Mr. Gore's comment about "taking initiative in creating the Internet" is so widely lampooned is its manifest braggadocio. It does no good to pretend he never tried to make the claim, or that he wasn't trying to get more credit than he was due.

      See here.

      --
      sigs, as if you care.
    5. Re:Same tired knee-jerk comment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you notice that bush NEVER discredited the content of the documents. Only their authenticity.

    6. Re:Same tired knee-jerk comment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I have an official document that Kerry molested baby monkeys and killed kittens for fun and profit, and he has NEVER discredited it.

    7. Re:Same tired knee-jerk comment... by WilliamSChips · · Score: 0, Redundant

      *sigh* I'm not sure if that post even deserves a response...

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    8. Re:Same tired knee-jerk comment... by tootlemonde · · Score: 1

      It does no good to pretend he never tried to make the claim, or that he wasn't trying to get more credit than he was due.

      People lampoon Gore for partisan politican purposes or because they incorrectly think he said he invented the Internet.

      I can do no better than cite the refutation of your point in a reply to your journal entry:

      It seems to me ... you can't bring yourself to recognize that something you believed has been disproved. Gore simply never claimed to that he "created the internet".

      ...

      Do you really want to see beyond the conventional misconceptions other people are comfortable believing?

    9. Re:Same tired knee-jerk comment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That is so true. People should be lampooned mercilessly for making such exaggerated claims and trying to get undue credit.

      Mission accomplished.

    10. Re:Same tired knee-jerk comment... by lheal · · Score: 1
      Gore simply never claimed to that he "created the internet".

      Oh, please. He said it while trying to get elected President in 1999. Just read the transcript.

      --
      Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
    11. Re:Same tired knee-jerk comment... by tootlemonde · · Score: 1

      Just read the transcript.

      Once again, I can do no better than cite a reply to your journal entry:

      Go back to the original interview that caused all this fuss. Gore's interviewer asks candidate Gore to point out the highlights of his legislative career. From the context I think any fair-minded person can see Gore left out a word. He should have said, "I took legislative initiative in creating the internet." Everyone knows he is not a Scientist or Engineer. He is a legislator. From the context any fair-minded person knows he was talking about "legislative initiative". It was an interview, it wasn't scripted. He left out the word "legislative".

      In addition, that reply contained a link to comments by Vinton Cerf.

      The Vice President was among the first of the members of Congress to recognize the importance of the Internet and his interest as far back as 1986 (to my certain knowledge) led him to sponsor legislation and to speak favorably about optical networks, high performance computing, and led to programs such as the National Research and Education Network program, the Next Generation Internet program and so on.

      I think the Vice President is very deserving of credit for his active support for the Internet and the businesses that depend upon it daily.

      Gore's statement in context was factually correct and no less than Vint Cerf says he deserves credit. At the time, you're lame response was, "I'm just using VP Gore's statement to show that from his point of view at the time, he was responsible for the explosion of the Internet in the '90s." As the transcript shows, Gore never claimed to be "responsible for the explosion of the Internet".

      Repeating the errors in your journal entry here is not going to make them any more valid.

    12. Re:Same tired knee-jerk comment... by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      1) The world wide web was invented in 1989 at CERN by Tim Berners-Lee. It was text based. Netscape did not invent the web. 2) Netscape was not even the first graphical browser, I was using NCSA Mosaic long before netscape came out (and I'm not sure Mosaic was first). Mosaic and Netscape were written by the same person but they were separate programs.

    13. Re:Same tired knee-jerk comment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet."

      asshat

    14. Re:Same tired knee-jerk comment... by Nasarius · · Score: 1
      It does no good to pretend he never tried to make the claim, or that he wasn't trying to get more credit than he was due.

      Come on. No sane person believes that Gore meant he did the technical work. It was a verbal slip, a poor phrasing; nothing more.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    15. Re:Same tired knee-jerk comment... by tootlemonde · · Score: 1

      Already dealt with.

    16. Re:Same tired knee-jerk comment... by Forthan+Red · · Score: 1
      "33 percent of Fox News viewers incorrectly believed it was true that the U.S. has found Iraqi weapons of mass destruction; only 11 percent of people who said they relied on PBS or NPR for news got this wrong. Thirty-five percent of the Fox viewers thought that world opinion favored the U.S. invasion of Iraq; only 5 percent of those who get their news from PBS or NPR had this misconception. And an overwhelming 67 percent of those who relied on Fox thought that the U.S. had found clear evidence that Saddam Hussein had worked closely with Al Qaeda; if you got your news from PBS/NPR, you had just a 16 percent chance of believing this falsehood."

      As the PIPA report (pdf) found, FOX makes you stupid.

    17. Re:Same tired knee-jerk comment... by Math,+The+Ancient · · Score: 1

      "During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet."

      Let's just agree he should have said "releasing" instead of "creating".

      --
      If I really am talking out of my ass...explain it to me with respect so I'll at least pull my ears out to listen.
    18. Re:Same tired knee-jerk comment... by tootlemonde · · Score: 1

      Let's just agree he should have said "releasing" instead of "creating".

      David J Farber suggests "instrumental in the development of" would be more accurate.

      Given the hostile and partisan way Gore's words have been misinterpreted, I doubt if Gore's critics are interested in his actual contribution to the creation of the Internet, however he might have phrased it.

      The award mentioned in the post that started this thread speaks for itself.

  24. MS not very insightful by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 4, Insightful
    How was it going to change your day-to-day work?

    That's what MS has never gotten. Make it part of a person's lifestyle first, then they'll make it part of their work.

    1. Re:MS not very insightful by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      That's what MS has never gotten. Make it part of a person's lifestyle first, then they'll make it part of their work.

      Hmm.. seems to me they get it quite well, but have an all improved version of it..

      Let others put the efford into making something a part of a person's lifestyle, and then have the 'right' product available once that happened..

    2. Re:MS not very insightful by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      Let others put the efford into making something a part of a person's lifestyle, and then have the 'right' product available once that happened..

      But they're always playing catch-up. Works for a while, not forever. We'll see if they can overturn google and iPod+iTunes.

    3. Re:MS not very insightful by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      But they're always playing catch-up. Works for a while, not forever. We'll see if they can overturn google and iPod+iTunes.

      If past experience tells us anything, they have a decent chance.

      They have the resources to try a few times untill they have something that is good enough and integrated into what people already have, and imho they have always managed to buy pretty decent hardware for rebranding.. Their software is another matter, but for the consumer 'good enough' will do.

  25. Give Rise? by ashayh · · Score: 1

    And Netscape's practice of openly sharing technology so that other programmers and their companies could build upon its ideas helped give rise to a global technology community, the open-source movement.
    Perhaps Netscape did help the open source movement. But did not give rise. People like RMS, ESR, Linus and many others that I can't possibly remember did that. Maybe they mean it was first for a company to open its source ? I don't know about that. Was there no large company before 1995 to give away source?

    1. Re:Give Rise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err... AT&T? UNIX?

    2. Re:Give Rise? by paul.dunne · · Score: 1

      I see what happened with Mosaic is happening again. RMS is not part of any "open source" movement, and Linux is Free Software. (No prizes for guessing who the "Imposter boy" is).

  26. Netscape didn't start dotcommania by museumpeace · · Score: 1

    but they sure made it visible. I was working for my second internet startup [for peanuts and equity] when Netscape's IPO broke into the news. The founder had begged for a year to get enough venture money to open our doors...and the delay cost us a precious first-mover advantage.
    But after Netscape, it was raining VC money, more money than good ideas.

    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
  27. It's not so hard to picture, really by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Funny

    Picture a world without Google, without eBay or Amazon or broadband

    Well, it'd make Jeff Bezos patent portfolio look a lot different. That's for sure.

    • Method for turning a rounded piece of metal to effect egress from a building.
    • Composition of a food like substance for the purpose of blowing rounded spheres
    • Method for using a cord like structure to hold shoes on human feet
    • Circular structure intended to make the lateral motion of a heavy load subject to less friction
    • ...
    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  28. They left out. . . by smooth+wombat · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Picture a world without Google, without eBay or Amazon or broadband,

    Or one without billions of emails promising V14gr4! on the cheap!, where stealing someones identity involved more than point-and-click. A world where people had to, gasp!, go out and talk to other people face-to-face to buy products or knew how to use a card catalog at the library.

    Yeah, those were the days oh so many eons ago. In fact, I distinctly remember my mom and dad having to round up the horses every morning to hook them to the carriage so they could go to work every morning while my brother and I washed our feet so they looked somewhat presentable after we had walked the two miles to school (uphill both ways mind you).

    While it's nice to remember how things were and the progress we've made, let's also not forget the things that we don't know how to do anymore. We're so wrapped up (some of us anyway) in what's latest and greatest that we now have less overall free time to do things and spend most of our time trying to figure out how to schedule our days.

    No, I'm not a luddite. I'm just one of those who don't see the point in much of what people are gaga over nowadays (a cel phone which can do 20 different things except make a decent call for example). If you're into web pages with Flash simply because Flash is the 'in thing' for web design, more power to ya. Just don't think that everyone else cares.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:They left out. . . by dR.fuZZo · · Score: 1

      "A world where people had to, gasp!, go out and talk to other people face-to-face to buy product..."

      It was called mail order back then. You would either phone or mail in an order instead of placing your order on the internet, but otherwise the idea was much the same.

      Some of us have been avoiding people for a lot longer than 10 years.

      --
      -- dR.fuZZo
    2. Re:They left out. . . by stlhawkeye · · Score: 1
      A world where people had to, gasp!, go out and talk to other people face-to-face to buy products or knew how to use a card catalog at the library.

      Yes, less efficient societies are always better! Damn you people for having quick and easy access to information instead of slogging through a huge crate of cards.

      While it's nice to remember how things were and the progress we've made, let's also not forget the things that we don't know how to do anymore.

      I consider that a measure of progress, that I don't need to remember how to darn socks or resole my shoes. It frees my time up for the study of things that improve the human condition rather than maintain the status quo. Vote stlhawkeye in 2012!

      We're so wrapped up (some of us anyway) in what's latest and greatest that we now have less overall free time to do things and spend most of our time trying to figure out how to schedule our days.

      I think technology tends to advance the human condition and give us more free time and more to do with the free time we have. I don't have to hand-wash my dishes and clothes, I throw them into a big white box and they come out clean like magic. The only major exception is the American obsession with cars, which have resulted in clogged city highways on which Americans burn through millions of barrels of oil puttering along at 6 miles an hour for two hours a day.

      No, I'm not a luddite. I'm just one of those who don't see the point in much of what people are gaga over nowadays (a cel phone which can do 20 different things except make a decent call for example).

      I'm with you there. The cell phone has definitely made my life easier, safer (except on the highway), and more efficient. But that's because I place calls on it, not because it plays MP3s, take pictures, text messages my girlfriend, or gives me a hug when I feel bad.

      --
      "I have never won a debate with an ignorant person." -Ali ibn Abi Talib
    3. Re:They left out. . . by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      A world where people had to, gasp!, go out and talk to other people face-to-face to buy products

      Reminds me of my disillusionment when I consciously decide to go visit a brick 'n mortar store to ask what they have in the way of Part X, or to help fix Problem Y. (Often, like many other geeks, I'll just google and web browse my way to a solution.) But, once in a while, I think, maybe a real person in a real store has real expertise and I could benefit from some face time.

      Get to the store and they've hired the cheapest droid they can find who, in response to my questions, goes to their terminal screen and does less than what I could do myself online.

      Sigh.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
  29. dumb moves by justforaday · · Score: 3, Funny

    My dad got an email from some guy named Marc Andreeson some ten or twelve years ago asking if he wanted to come work for his new company. Naturally, my father being a government employee with a decent pension plan decided to toss the email... :-/

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    1. Re:dumb moves by kusanagi374 · · Score: 1

      Well, fast forward to today... what's better: having tossed the email ten years ago or picking up the job to be tossed away by AOL a couple of years ago?

    2. Re:dumb moves by justforaday · · Score: 1

      Well, considering the email came from Andreeson, it probably would've been one of the earlier jobs at Netscape (my father had been doing a lot of things with WAIS for a few years by that point). I think the cashout and subsequent fallback to contracting (post-AOL) would've worked out quite favorably for him. As it is, he was more or less forced into early retirement from the gov't, only to be picked up by a contractor who then hired him back out to the gov't at a higher cost than it was costing them initially. But hey, one less government employee, right? Either way, he's certainly not doing too badly for himself. Just one of those random "could've's"...

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
  30. Accelerating business cycles: Netscape v MS by G4from128k · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Netscape's rise and fall epitomizes the acceleration of the business cycle. The fact that anyone can download anything at low cost and the fact that most people replace their computers every 2 years means a new, small company can quickly grow its customer base. And those same tools meant that MS could, just as quickly distribute its own browser and quickly take Netscape's installbase from the company.

    Low distribution costs and PC turnover means that marketshare leadership is not assailable under most conditions -- its too easy for people to replace old software, especially when they get a new computer. Only companies that have an interoperability hook that ties past, present, and future generations of software and systems together have any hope of retaining marketshare.

    MS has tried, and succeeded, in creating that hook with IE in that many websites "work best" with Explorer and Windows-specific web functionality (VBscript, ActiveX, MS-extensions to javascript, etc.). To the extent that MS is forced, in the future, to embrace true open standards (not embrace-and-extent forks of those standards) then the OS and app maker will become vulnerable to rapid changes in marketshare.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  31. Re:Tim Berners-Lee by tedgyz · · Score: 1

    Because he didn't go on to form some wildly successful .com company, rape an pillage an unwitting stock market, and sellout to a dying behemoth (AOL).

    People don't seem to care about you if you don't make an unreasonable amount of money doing something.

    Imagine if some greedy pig like MS had "invented" the internet. We'd be paying by the bit. /. wouldn't exist because it would be too costly to read all the comments. :-)

    --
    "No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
  32. Self-referential by LukePieStalker · · Score: 1

    The best bart was using the Netscape browser to watch the Netscape stock quote as the IPO popped.

    1. Re:Self-referential by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using Netscape 4 to download IE. The using IE last year to download Firefox.

  33. Revolution OS by eldavojohn · · Score: 0

    You're right but to understand more how Netscape's attitude and eventual martyrdom still affects us, watch Revolution OS. It's a bit slow at times and the ending has a terrible open source band playing music but it's quite informative.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  34. And before NSCA Mosaic by milosoftware · · Score: 1

    And before Mosaic, there was Gopher.

    Before Google, there was Lycos. I once typed the word "Computer" and got 3000 hits.

    Nothing as much fun as getting Mosaic to compile on your Apollo workstation. Took a few nights, but the results were awesome.

    And it took revenge too - just click on the About menu option of IE:
    Based on NCSA Mosaic. NCSA Mosaic(TM); was developed at the National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

    --
    Musicians don't die. They just decompose.
    1. Re:And before NSCA Mosaic by hhghghghh · · Score: 1
      Before Google, there was Lycos. I once typed the word "Computer" and got 3000 hits.

      I think you mean altavista. And of course webcrawler.

  35. IPO was not a new TLA by tverbeek · · Score: 1
    where few people have even heard of IPOs.

    Just because the dot-com boom was the first time that geeks started noticing talk about IPOs, the concept of companies going public and selling stock with Initial Public Offerings wasn't exactly new, not even to the general public. "IPO" was already part of the standard jargon of Wall Street and the countless people who invested in the stock market... more than "a few".

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  36. Netscape was great by rihock · · Score: 1

    You can say what you want, but Netscape was a great company to work for. Everyone was competent and dedicated to being successful. Every company I've worked for since when compared to them, falls short. Not saying I want to go back in time, but I miss working with whip-smart techies- my current company 'thinks' they're a tech company, but they're just an 'integrator' who thinks they know what tech really is....

    --
    # nohup ./start_sig
    1. Re:Netscape was great by quarkscat · · Score: 1

      I don't know about working for them, but I do know that they had their bases covered when it came to having a browser for every platform. Even five years ago, you could get Netscape browser OR Communicator for everything from FreeBSD to Linux to SGI IRIX to Sun Solaris to Apple Mac OS 9 to Windows NT -- and for free! Nowadays, you are lucky just to have a version for Windows.

      And apparently the lack of competition is catching on like wildfire -- the Mozilla Project has dropped mozilla (like Communicator) in favor of the concept that "less is more", apparently taking their clue from MSFT's "Longhorn" project...

    2. Re:Netscape was great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My experience working for Netscape was somewhat different from yours. I joined about eight months after their IPO, a few months before the company's 2nd anniversary. A lot of cash was flowing and nobody knew what to do with it.

      Netscapes management felt invincible at that point. They thought they could take on Microsoft and win. My employee number was about 1000, and there were 40 other new employees starting the same week as me. That kind of rapid growth is impossible to maintain. Here were some of the more memorable symptoms:

      My direct manager started at the company a few weeks before I did, and had just as little clue about what was going on as I did.

      The person who hired me was two levels higher in management by the time I started work, and had forgotten all about me. I showed up for my first day of work, and wound up sitting in the lobby for three hours until the receptionist managed to contact someone who knew what to do with me.

      Don't get me wrong...the parties were great. There were lots of cool freebies, which I've kept for sentimental value. The entire company shut down on Friday afternoons so we could all drink beer in the courtyard. And IIRC, the cafeteria food wasn't half bad. ...but in the end, it was clear that my hard work was never going to see the light of day. There was so much mismanagement and duplicated effort. I wound up quitting my job there after only three months because I couldn't take it anymore.

    3. Re:Netscape was great by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "I don't know about working for them, but I do know that they had their bases covered when it came to having a browser for every platform."

      Not Amiga. Not the ST/TT/Falcon. You had to be running Linux on those hardware choices to get Netscape. And I mean back in 96/97, not 2000.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  37. Picture a world by geeber · · Score: 1

    Picture a world where slashdot credited the author of the article, rather than the submitter who simply cuts and pastes the blurb as their own.

    Sigh, sorry to complain, but it's a pet peeve of mine.

  38. Microsoft and Mozilla really got things going by ShatteredDream · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What many people also forget is that Netscape sucked after version 3. I was one of those rabidly anti-Microsoft people who defended Netscape (wrongly) because of Microsoft's monopoly. Firefox and Mozilla proved that Microsoft can be beaten in time without the government.

    Let's also not forget that AJAX' XMLHttpRequest object, which powers many of Google's new services, was invented by Microsoft with IE 5. I remember Netscape 4 sucking so bad that when IE 4 was about to go gold that there were people lining up in the chat room that I was in on Westwood Studios' chat service for C&C players to get as they ranted about Communicator.

    And my God was it a POS. The thing was horribly bloated, ugly, not standards compliant and a spectacular mess to maintain, hence the mozilla guys practically starting over from scratch. Let's not forget something here, which Google has not. Netscape lost not because IE went free, but because Netscape 4 was such a bloat POS that it was agonizing to use it compared to IE 4. Netscape lost because when Microsoft got their act together, Netscape went from the elite of browser design to rank amateurs at best.

    1. Re:Microsoft and Mozilla really got things going by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How odd, honestly I remember the exact opposite. I too remember when IE4 was first released. This was during the Windows 95 days. Remember how Microsoft bundled Active Desktop with IE4? I remember hanging out on Efnet in like an #ie4 or #win95 channel and it was very obvious the browser was a POS. Active Desktop was disasterous -- It crashed every 2 seconds.

      I remember Netscape 4 being the fast, slick, and stable browser that everyone enjoyed to use.

    2. Re:Microsoft and Mozilla really got things going by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's also not forget that AJAX' XMLHttpRequest object, which powers many of Google's new services, was invented by Microsoft with IE 5.

      And let's not forget that most of the things you can do with "AJAX", you can do with more traditional remote scripting. The browser that made that possible? Netscape 2.

    3. Re:Microsoft and Mozilla really got things going by The+Outbreak+Monkey · · Score: 1

      "Netscape lost not because IE went free, but because Netscape 4 was such a bloat POS that it was agonizing to use it compared to IE 4."

      Netscape lost because they "practically started over from scratch."

      Check out Joel's take on it here: http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog00000000 69.html

  39. They didn't interview JWZ! by Dammital · · Score: 4, Interesting
    ... whose website has some pretty entertaining stuff.

    the netscape dorm
    my employer can blow me
    resignation and postmortem
    netscape and aol

    1. Re:They didn't interview JWZ! by jbuilder · · Score: 1

      JWZ is a bitter bar owner now. He was always very negative about Netscape (the company) even when he worked there. Anyone remember the "My Employer Can Blow Me" posting of his?

      JWZ is arrogant, overrated, and on the ash-heap of IT history. ...nuff said.

      --
      Polymorphism -- It's what you make of it.
    2. Re:They didn't interview JWZ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So so true. jwz makes Theo De Raadt look pleasant and humble.

    3. Re:They didn't interview JWZ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, JWZ is a crazy mofo. Not sure if you heard, but he once posted a tirade called "my employer can blow me"! Maybe someone can link it.

    4. Re:They didn't interview JWZ! by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      Here's a link to JWZ's "my employer can blow me" editorial.

  40. Let's Not Forget Netscape's Arrogance by zentec · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The common mode for many Silicon Valley companies of the time like Netscape and SGI was simply pure arrogance. Ever try dealing with these people?

    Netscape was unbelieveable. While they might have been the first to come up with an ISP agreement, wanting a percentage of the ISP's revenue for a package they GAVE AWAY online was asking way too much. Their other products, like their Collabra server, were WinNT ports of open source products like INN. And they worked like magic; it took a lot of hocus pokus to keep it running more than twelve hours. And forget actually interfacing it to Usenet, it simply couldn't handle the load.

    If you called and complained, you were basically told "it is what it is, but the new version fixes it so send us more money". And that was just one software product.

    Marc Andressen was not the golden boy he likes to make himself out to be. He was in the right place at the right time, and fortunately for him, made out pretty well. But he's a one trick pony.

    Netscape didn't die because of Microsoft, Netscape died because of their own arrogance and they believed their own marketing. Good riddance. At least what was left was turned into something decent.

    1. Re:Let's Not Forget Netscape's Arrogance by Electric+Eye · · Score: 1

      Andreeson def WAS a one trick pony. I hope he's able to keep his fortune. Really, what became of him? He became CTO for the company (in which I don't recall him doing much) and then really disappeared. Oh, yeah, he started some company with a cloud in the name, but I think that flopped after it's IPO.

      That said, I'd love to be in his shoes. I could be retired at 33 and driving my new Porsche around a race track today.

    2. Re:Let's Not Forget Netscape's Arrogance by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1
      Netscape didn't die because of Microsoft, Netscape died because of their own arrogance and they believed their own marketing.

      Yea, adding IE to windows installations and blackmailing all the manufacturers to keep it on the desktop and lying about it being part of the OS had nothing to do with it. Neither did intentionally generating funky HTML code from frontpage and word (look at table generation and tell me that would generate a valid table... fat chance!).

      IE is such a turd that is why it is loosing market share even today, even though it was once 100% of the traffic at a lot of large sites. No, IE unseating Netscape had everything to do with Microsoft and their clear monopoly. This is not just my opinion either, this was proven in court. I suspect that Intel took this from Microsoft and put it into the C compiler - as advertised on /. recently. Run slow code if it isn't a genuine Intel processor.

  41. The two other things that made it possible by mc6809e · · Score: 1


    A text-only web is perfectly usable at 2400bps, but uninteresting to most of the general public.

    The 14.4kbps modem and jpeg image compression made it possible for the average person to say "pretty pictures from 3000 miles away. Neat!"

    In my judgement, these technologies were more more difficult to develop and more important than adding graphics to the web browser.

    1. Re:The two other things that made it possible by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "A text-only web is perfectly usable at 2400bps, but uninteresting to most of the general public"

      It would have worked at that speed. The page designers and web app programmers would have been forced to come up with ingenious compression routines and efficient transfer protocols. You would have ended up with a Web that would have had enough useful color graphics and "Pizzazz" to have been extremel popular with the public, even if the ability to download large files and stream intense media would have never been comparable.

      With high-speed modems and broadband, it matters a lot less if the 'Net apps are kludgey and the pages are huge and sloppy.

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    2. Re:The two other things that made it possible by FuzzyFox · · Score: 1

      Way back when, Prodigy had some method of doing "video text" where they would send out streams of font cues and graphics primitives (vector draws and fills) over a low-bandwidth connection for the purpose of drawing pictures and having nifty text. What ever happened to that sort of technology? It was pretty efficient use of the bandwidth and still had some pizzazz.

      --
      splunge (n) -- A good idea.. but it could be lousy... and I'm not being indecisive!
  42. Re:Tim Berners-Lee by torpor · · Score: 1


    He coded the first Graphical Browser, not 'the' first browser. Also, he didn't invent HTML .. it is a subset of the SGML work others were doing at the time, but he did prove it with his implementations under NextStep.

    I just can't understand why Andreesen is more popular than Berners-Lee.

    Andreesen was a narcissistic sports jock working in Sillicon Valley, Berners-Lee a humble physics geek living in Switzerland.

    Which realm do you think provides for the overt promotion required to get the attention of your average non-computer-savvy person and media pimps?

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  43. Mosaic by cheezemonkhai · · Score: 2, Funny

    No far from it, MS half inched Mosaic and turned it into IE.

    Anybody who uses IE probably still has some of the original Mosic bugs in the code they use :)

    1. Re:Mosaic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      woah there, rabid fanboy. It was Spyglass that butchered Mosaic.

      Let's think a little harder about how we can incorporate an MS bash that is tangently related to this article. Hmm. I've got it! MS bought Spyglass, and as we all know, buying companies is bad. Evil, dirty, no-good corporations buy other companies. Therefore, MS has to be evil. No thanks needed. My work here is done.

      Er, wait a minute. Netscape stole the key developer of Mosaic. Hmm. Evil versus evil. Just gotta figure out which is the less evil. Hmm. Ut oh, Netscape did introduce the BLINK tag. But MS must always be evil, so how can Netscape be more evil? GASP! Turn back now! The paradoxeses!!@ AHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!

    2. Re:Mosaic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Evil versus evil.

      For a second, I thought you were talking about the war...

  44. Good ol' days... by MirrororriM · · Score: 3, Funny
    Picture a world without Google, without eBay or Amazon or broadband, where few people have even heard of IPOs.

    Why, when I was a young programmer we had to write the code in the snow with our pee, and a compiler was just a word for the pilot of the hovering dirigible that read the instructions and passed them to the ALU, which was another fellow with an abacus. They would wrap the results around a rock, and drop it on my house when the program would exit. We had to walk uphill...

    I love these good ol' days stories :)

    --
    Content Management System: A pretentious way of saying "text editor."
  45. Even IE still pays homage to Mosaic by NoRefill · · Score: 1

    Look in the Help->About Internet Explorer and you'll find IE's humble beginnings as well:

    "Based on NCSA Mosaic. NCSA Mosaic(TM); was developed at the National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign."

  46. the history of the web from CERN: by piters · · Score: 3, Informative

    You may have a look at this:
    http://public.web.cern.ch/public/Content/Chapters/ AboutCERN/Achievements/WorldWideWeb/WWW-en.html
    among others, includes the link to the proposal of the WWW made at CERN by Tim in 1989:
    http://www.w3.org/History/1989/proposal.html
    and refined by Robert Cailliau in 1990:
    http://www.w3.org/Proposal.html

    BTW, noone seems to remember about Robert Cailliau, the co-author of the thing...

  47. Screw the web! by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm still hoping my investments in Gopherspace will pay off!

  48. Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ' It's a myth that Al Gore ever claimed to have anything to do with the technical design of the Internet. '

    The CNN record of Gore's actual interview is more enlightening. He said he "took the initiative in creating" the Internet while he was in Congress.

    1. Re:Correction by jedidiah · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Al Gore was the congressional patron of the old bearded guys that did the actual work. None of them take exception to the idea that Gore created the internet.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Vint Cerf was ok with him saying that, then I'm pretty sure you slashdorks should be willing to accept it as well.

    3. Re:Correction by ImaLamer · · Score: 2, Informative

      You are right, they applaud Gore's efforts (as all here should):

      e-mail from Vint Cerf (vcerf@MCI.NET) and Robert Kahn, September 28, 2000

    4. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The majority of the retards who post here, especially the morons who post endless jokes about Al Gore, don't know who Vint Cerf or Robert Kahn are. John Carmack is about their level.

  49. Topic Marathons by rgf71 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yesterday was DIY Marathon Day. Is today going to be Nostalgia Marathon Day?

    What about tomorrow?

  50. You Got to Be Innovative by Evil+W1zard · · Score: 1

    The article doesn't matter because MS says that they are the only ones who have been innovative in the last 452 years. In fact if Al Gore says he invented the idea of the Internet then MS will say that they invented Al Gore (it could happen you know!)

    --
    News Reporters Make Tasty Polar Bear Treats!
  51. The web was always GUI by DragonHawk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Of course, it took a GUI (thanks to Mosaic) for hypertext to catch on..."

    Um, the original web browser, called "WorldWideWeb", was GUI. On NextSTEP, even, which is known to be very GUI. The big thing that Mosaic introduced, I believe, was the ability to display graphics (GIFs and JPGs) and text together. It turned the web into multimedia.

    Another interesting bit is that WorldWideWeb allowed interactive, real-time editing from early on. To edit a page, you just clicked in and started typing. Wiki is old news.

    (DISCLAIMER: I've never actually used WorldWideWeb, only read about it. I could be even more wrong then usual.)

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
    1. Re:The web was always GUI by kalidasa · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, WorldWideWeb displayed graphics in separate windows; Mosaic made the images inline (thus the name, "Mosaic"). Anybody know if 1. the code to WorldWideWeb is still around, 2. if it works on OS X? (Which is based upon NeXTStep.)

    2. Re:The web was always GUI by schotter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, by 1993 WorldWideWeb displayed images inline. (Development of NCSA Mosaic 0.1a began that same year.) WorldWideWeb may not have been first, but if not, it wasn't far behind.

      1. Yes, the source code to the original (1990/1991?) version of WorldWideWeb can be found in the W3.org history section.

      2. It definitely doesn't work on Mac OS X as-is, though I've been wondering for a few months how much effort would be required to get it working, just for kicks.

  52. Birth of the term IPO? by hagrin · · Score: 1

    Obviously, Netscape also built Wall Street.

    1. Re:Birth of the term IPO? by releppes · · Score: 1

      Maybe not, but they certainly paved the way for on-line trading. I remember when the concept of shopping on-line was just that. Only a thought, "Hey! Imagine ordering a pizza or buying some jeans with your computer and having it delivered to your house." Shit, we take that for granted now, but in 1990 it was just a cool thought. I personally never thought ecommerce would take off that fast. So your obvious whitty comment about Netscape building wall street really isn't too far off. The concept of trading via a computer was just a fantasy. Once it because a reality, I got to see it first hand. In 1996 wall street just started to pioneer cutting out the broker by allowing traders to interact directly with each other via terminals. In a few very short years, the stock floor became nothing but a ghost town. All the brokers that would broker trades via the phone have since lost their jobs. That stuff you still see on TV about the ringing of the bell and people standing on the floor waving tickets...it's mostly just for show. Now it's everyone trying to beat each other out on the keyboard. Not only that, but because the computer interface was so easy to use, you have all these companies like eTrade offering online trading so the people that use to do it for a living are now competing against grandma. Again, Netscape didn't build Wall Street, but they certainly paved the way for a new environment. So yes, in a way, Netscape had a large part in building what Wall Street is today. They started it all (picking up where gopher and archie left off ;)

  53. Dial-up speeds by DragonHawk · · Score: 2, Informative

    "On a real note, who gets 56k dialup?"

    Nobody (on the US PSTN) gets 56 Kbit, as that would exceed some obscure FCC limit. You're limited to 53 Kbit. I have seen that in practice, but it's pretty rare, and I expect you have to be right next to the CO on brand new wires to get it.

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
    1. Re:Dial-up speeds by Stauf · · Score: 1

      My understanding of this 'obscure FCC limit' was that there were concerns over some of the frequencies used by high-speed modems (at the time) turning the phone lines into huge transmitters that trod on other frequencies (similar to the ham radio vs. IP over power lines thing).

  54. Remember Gopher? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    I check Lynx every once in a while. It's not that good anymore when you get pages full of Java and script crap. Checking Lynx also can show you how unnecessary a lot of this Java and script crap is.

    Remember Gopher? If not for the Netscape browser revolution, we might be still using Gopher to this day (and Google would be the top-of-the-line Archie site). Somewhere along the way, someone would have found a way to crap up Gopher with popups and scripts, no doubt.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  55. They didn't even mention me! by RealProgrammer · · Score: 3, Funny

    I was working as a student support tech at the University of Illinois. My boss, who had been in Marc Andreesen's department, said he was having trouble with some Unix thing. Being the only approachable Unix type around, she asked me to help him. I called or emailed him, and agreed to come take a look at his workstation.

    In my august wizardness I never found the building, so I never got to meet Marc or solve his problem.

    I can't believe they didn't even mention my central role in Netscape's development.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
  56. Re:Tim Berners-Lee by m50d · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because he resisted the future. He didn't want pictures on the web, and certainly not all the plugin based stuff we have today. You get the impression he wanted to keep it academic. If TBL had run the show the web would be just another cool research toy.

    --
    I am trolling
  57. "Data conditioned" phone lines by DragonHawk · · Score: 1

    "As I recall, you had the option of either using a standard phone line or getting 'data' phone lines in those days at a slightly higher cost from the phone companies. Might've been a scam most places, but who knows."

    That's pretty much a scam, yah. At least it is in the US.

    With standard analog modems at both ends, government mandated line quality is good enough for the 33 Kbit symetric max you see. Paying extra for what you're already entitled to is silly.

    For 53 Kbit connects (which rely on having a digital telco switch at one end), I'm pretty sure the same standards apply, but I'm not positve.

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
  58. The old face of identity theft. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "where stealing someones identity involved more than point-and-click"

    You bet! I remember the good old days when you had to rip someone's face from their skull and replace yours with it.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  59. What about CERN?? by mattmakris · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hey could somebody please give CERN credit? They were the ones who gave birth to the technology, Marc Andreesen, Eric Bina, and Tim Berners-Lee only continued research and ended up releasing a commercial development of Mosaic and Netscape. Duh!

    MM

  60. Re:Tim Berners-Lee by nogginthenog · · Score: 1

    That's Sir Tim Berners-Lee to you!

  61. Yeah by rbarreira · · Score: 1

    Technological singularity arriving, baby...

    --

    The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
  62. Waht about a link to the actual product? by houghi · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://houghi.org/script/Netscape.zip

    It is the Windows 3.1 Netscape 1 file. I hope it works, because I got it from a floppy that also included the dialupconnection, trupet winsock, emailclient and some other stuff and all that on 1 (one) floppy. Could be that I did not include enough files and I have no option to test it.

    That was my first internetconnection and it worked like a charm.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:Waht about a link to the actual product? by OakDragon · · Score: 1

      Thanks, it does work. It works on a brand new Dell, Windows XP SP2... wow. I have had 3 year old software not work, but this does!

  63. Umm... by HuffMeister · · Score: 1

    I distinctly remember when the first Netscape Beta came out... If I recall correctly, I believe it was NCSA Mosaic that really dazzled us with the first streaming video, and really got the web moving, although we'd been using lynx for sometime before that... *sniff* People can't even conceive of a non-netscape world! Sad!

  64. So here's the question by argStyopa · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mosaic had two children, Netscape and IE.
    IE lives on, while Netscape died in an "accident" but is survived by more-or-less bastard children of many names- mozilla/firefox, Opera, etc.

    So now, 10 years later, do we know for sure: did IE murder Netscape, was it truly an accident of circumstance, or was it semi-suicide?

    I'd genuinely like to know.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:So here's the question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it.

  65. I believe MS broke the Netscape monopoly by freezin+fat+guy · · Score: 1

    How's that for inviting flames?

    If you followed the scene through those last turbulent years you will recall that Netscape tried to pull a 'Microsoft' on the internet, introducing a waft of proprietary extensions to their popular browser. At that point it was Microsoft who suddenly took an interest in the W3C and standards based browsing.

    Ironically it may be a fortunate thing for the internet and the global community that Netscape's monopoly was broken. Now it is imperative we do the same to Microsoft.

    Longhorn Avalon looks great but unless my eyes deceive me I believe it is an attempt to make the browser irrelevant. Once web apps communicate directly with the OS instead of the browser the monopoly is complete, no?

  66. Mosaic Communications by DragonHawk · · Score: 1

    "And the first release of the Netscape browser (the "Navigator" name didn't come until a couple years later, IIRC, but someone please tell me if I'm wrong)"

    Not so much wrong as incomplete.

    The original name for the company was "Mosaic Communications". The domain name they registered for this, http://www.mcom.com/, still takes you to the Netscape website. The name for the product was going to be "Mosaic NetScape". It turned out they couldn't use the Mosaic name (I forget why, prolly a trademark), so they changed the name of the company to "NetScape" and the name of the product to "Navigator".

    And for those who don't know: The original "working title" for the program was "Mozilla", a combination of "Mosaic" and "Godzilla". That's where that name comes from.

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
  67. Oops, media whore JWZ not invited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He must be pissed, he can't shutup about his coding exploits there.

  68. Best part by Chunt620 · · Score: 1

    My 20% stake in Netscape was worth $663 million on the day of the IPO. I remember because later I needed to come up with a tail number for an airplane I bought.

    Best quote of the entire article

  69. Big Blue E by DragonHawk · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Ask the non-geeks around you if they know what Mosaic is. Then ask them when they started using "Netscape"."

    Most of the non-geeks around me think "the Internet" is a big blue E that sits on their desktop. If I say "browser" they think I'm talking about a customer that doesn't buy anything.

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
    1. Re:Big Blue E by Fishstick · · Score: 1
      Actual conversation with my brother in law

      "I'm having trouble with my sound card"

      "ok, you want to make sure you have the latest drivers installed first."

      "ok, how do I do that?"

      "you have a soundblaster. go to creative's site and look for the latest version"

      "huh?"

      "ok, here's what you want to do: open your browser, and in the address bar type in H Tee Tee Pee, Colon, Slash Slash..."*

      "wait, what? Oh, you mean go to the internet?"

      *fercrissakes*

      "maybe you should just call Dell"


      *ok, I actually said "creative.com", but that sounded funnier

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  70. Re:Tim Berners-Lee by jokercito · · Score: 1

    It's called marketing oneself.

  71. Re:Tim Berners-Lee by barzok · · Score: 3, Informative

    And the people who keep asking "what about Tim Berners-Lee?" seem to be forgetting Vannevar Bush.

  72. If, then... by Blitzenn · · Score: 1

    If Netscape is responsible for the birth of the 'World Wide Web' can I then blame them for the resulting 'Dot Com' crash that cost me so much money and lowerred my income? If they hadn't invented it in the first place, all of this crap never would have happened. (?) I worked happily in the tech arena prior to Netscape and was well paid, very well paid. Now no one wants to risk their dollars on technology unless there is a proven return. Not a bad thing, but it certainly stifels innovation. ;)

  73. CERN, NSCA, Netscape by DragonHawk · · Score: 1

    "How about Cern and Tim Berners-Lee? The initial Netscape release was basically the same as NCSA Mosaic which came before it."

    Just to clarify:

    CERN is the European Organization for Nuclear Research (the acroynm isn't English-language). Tim Berners-Lee "created" the original web browser, WorldWideWeb, while he was working there.

    Mosaic was developed at NCSA, the National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois in Urbana-Champaign.

    Marc Andreesen and Eric Bina were the original creators of Mosaic while they were students working at NCSA. Andreesen later founded Netscape Communications (originally Mosaic Communications) to try and build a company around the success of Mosaic.

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
  74. Click here for the world wide web by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 0, Troll

    I was doing tech support at Prodigy (remember them?) in 93'-94'. At the time Compuserve, Prodigy and an upstart called AOL were the big online players, each with their own 'world' that paying users could venture into.

    Then in early 94' there was a portal added to Prodigy allowing (some) users to access something called the "World Wide Web". I was a beta tester at Prodigy and thus was allowed early access into this new feature.

    If I remember correctly, it was essentially a 'door way' out of the Prodigy gui into the Prodigy browser which I think was Mozilla or some variant. It was very exciting at the time and it seemed from that point on, most Prodigy users could give a crap about Prodigy's carefully groomed and manicured little world. They just headed in droves for that button that said "Click here for the World Wide Web"!

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
  75. WorldWideWeb today by DragonHawk · · Score: 0

    "Anybody know if 1. the code to WorldWideWeb is still around..."

    http://www.w3.org/History/1991-WWW-NeXT/Implementa tion/

    "if it works on OS X?"

    This says no.

    "Which is based upon NeXTStep."

    My understanding is that MacOS X isn't really so-much "based on" NeXTStep (in terms of re-using the same implementation pieces), but rather makes use of many of the same ideas and interfaces. So "inspired by" might be a better term.

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
  76. Re:Tim Berners-Lee by dtietze · · Score: 1

    While it's all well and good that Tim B-L gets all that publicity, please don't forget Robert Cailliau, who worked with TBL on the WWW at CERN (and who is - by the way - a very decent chap!). He's also been awarded the 1995 ACM Software System Award by the ACM for his work on the WWW - see http://www.acm.org/awards/ss_citations/1995A.html
    See http://robert.cailliau.free.fr/ByLetter/M/Me/CV.ht ml for more details. Or read http://www.oup.co.uk/isbn/0-19-286207-3
    Dan.

  77. I still have the floppies by simetra · · Score: 1

    Though Netscape was free, you could buy it to show support, etc., so I did. I still have the 2 floppy disks that it came on. I think it was version 1.1, but don't feel like pulling them out to look and see.

    Even back then, Microsoft was Evil(tm) and Netscape showed a glimmer of hope against them. Oh well.

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
  78. favicon.ico on fortune.com is still Netscape logo by ddkilzer · · Score: 1

    I posted about this before, but fortune.com has never changed their favicon.ico from the default that comes with Netscape Enterprise server. When do you suppose they'll figure it out?

  79. Duh... by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

    Forgive me but I think I meant Mosaic, not Mozilla...

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
  80. Al Gore is a MicroSoft product? by haakondahl · · Score: 1

    Well, I guess I can see it. He was released in beta, he crashed on his debut, and now he is a bloated, hairy, artificial construct with a proclivity for helping the Communists. Yup, he's legit!

    ---
    Aw, geez, it's a MS joke. It's an Algore joke. Get over it.

    --
    Don't trust anyone under thirty.
  81. XMosaic in 2005! by sprag · · Score: 3, Funny

    I just built version 1.2 from 1993 and its pretty quick.

    It won't render slashdot, though :(

    Now I'm off to build 2.6!

  82. Netscape and Trumpet Winsock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How the memories come rushing back. Windows 3.1/3.11. Trumpet Winsock running in the lower corner. Netscape version 1 with a crappy looking "N" as the loading symbol.

  83. Re:Tim Berners-Lee by megarich · · Score: 1
    Ahhh yes Tim Berners-Lee. Probably one of the few cool things my college has done was set up a live video conference interview with Tim Berners-Lee. What was good about this was there was also a question/answer period from the audience.

    This was 4/5 years ago so sadly I don't remember hardly anything that was said. The only thing that sticks out in my mind someone asked him a question similar "if could change something, what would it be" and he responded "getting rid of having to type on htt:// beore every address". It was a funny moment.

    No real point to this. Guess I'm just acknowledging that I knew Tim Berners-Lee invented the web though I will admit hadn't it been for this interview, I would have no clue who he was or who invented the web.

  84. Re:Tim Berners-Lee by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

    Berners-Lee gave us a system for sharing dry academic documents, one that wasn't substantially better or worse than Gopher and Archie and WAIS and all the other networked hypertext systems of the time.

    Andreesen gave us pretty pictures to look at.

    And that is why he is the one who is celebrated.

  85. Lynx, Pine, Pico, trn, et al Await your Return! by haakondahl · · Score: 1

    Recently, I got myself a membership on sdf.lonestar.org. Originally, I just wanted a truly external site from which to ping & probe back into my network (was studying for CCNA, got it!). But I went ahead and paid for the membership (there is a free version which is still satisfying). So now, I'm typing this from a hp laptop (which is yes on my lap) and still checking newsgroups using trn on the G4 iMac occupying the desk. I have pimped out my terminal emulator so that it shows bright green text on a green-black background, then made the whole thing largely transparent (the emulator, not the iMac) so I can keep an eye on my little Forex venture behind the terminal. It's all vaguely unsettling.

    Anyhoo, does anybody remember a column/website/mailing list called "Outgoing Mail" from the early 1990's? This was when I first got online, at UNM. 2400, Lynx, trn, etc... Imagine my horror when I was ordered to "upgrade" all of those beautiful WFW 486s to Win95! We slapped in 14.4 modems, and might just as well have started using smoke signals. But eventually, we were MOSAIC and Netscape and happy.

    Then, as others have pointed out, NS4 (Collabra, etc) came out and it sucked, and it was time to leave school, anyway...

    And for those who missed it, let me just throw that little plug in there again: http://sdf.lonestar.org/. Hopefully, I'll see you there.

    --
    Don't trust anyone under thirty.
  86. For christsakes... by Omega · · Score: 1
    The article is just about remembering Netscape. Why does remembering Netscape have to be a competition as to what was more influential in the birth of the web?

    Besides, it's not like Tim Berners-Lee has gone forgotten on slashdot... Or Mosaic.

    And wasn't Marc Andresson, the creator of Mosaic, also Vice-President of Netscape? So let's not fly off the handle with our evil-corporation theories here.

  87. Better yet remember Archie servers? by Banner · · Score: 1

    Or Jughead and Veronica?

    I wonder how many people on the web even heard of those servers/services, much less remember them.

    But you're right about one thing, Mosaic -was- first.

    1. Re:Better yet remember Archie servers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean Archie and Veronica?

      I was around back then and I dont recall a service called jughead.

    2. Re:Better yet remember Archie servers? by Banner · · Score: 1

      Jughead didn't last. I honestly can't even remember what Jughead's function was.

  88. Feeeeearing redundancy, but . . . by Amiasian · · Score: 1

    I'd like to add my voice to those advocating Tim Berners-Lee's unsung role in all of this. And perhaps, NeXT's as well.

    NeXT seems to have really given the framework which allowed for this sort of thing to happen. Rapid development times (in that era) easy-to-build GUIs, object oriented centric focus.

    (I designed HTML by simply sub-classing the text object.)

    Anyways, could Steve Jobs . . . in a way, be an unsung hero of the web, too?

  89. Programmers Story? by neckjonez · · Score: 1

    What I'd like to see is a similar story, but interview the trench workers. I'd probably find that more interesting...

  90. The good the bad the days gone by by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love the Grateful Dead. In 1994 I was using AOL. I was 16 at the time. AOL had (has?) a "Grateful Dead Forum", it was a small community of people much like a micro-environment of the "lot". It was wonderful. In 1994 I used AOL to read the newsgroups, chat about the grateful dead in "710 Ashbury", visit dead.net, visit deadnetcentral.com grateful dead hotline etc.

    On August 9, 1995, Jerry died. On August 9, 1995, Netscape had it's IPO.

    At the time I wasn't into any tech. Sometime after that I learned to write html, then javascript, then css, then started learning about computer hardware, installing and configuring certain OS's, then A+, then Net+.

    Nowadays, my mailbox is full of spam, websites are full of annoying flash and ads, windows has barely changed in the larger sense.

    Save for Linux, Google, /., pr0n and BT. The world and the internet have been becoming worse and worse "places" to be.

  91. No, it's not off-topic by TheUnknownCoder · · Score: 1

    Picture a world...Talking about "pictures" and the beginning of it all, here's the first picture ever to be clicked on in a web browser...

    --
    Uncopyrightable: The longest word you can write without repeating a letter.
  92. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  93. How old is the avg /.r, 12? by gelfling · · Score: 3, Funny

    You talk about 10 years ago like it's some far off mythical land with hobbits and trolls and shit.

  94. Re:Tim Berners-Lee by an_mo · · Score: 1

    I believe his browser was the first, and was *NOT* graphical. The first graphical browser was probably mosaic.

  95. Re:Tim Berners-Lee by an_mo · · Score: 1

    I am not sure I agree. TBL invented a system that was flexible enough to add pictures and other media to it. He was the one with the intuition of combining internet+hypertext; I find it amusing that he even went to an hypertext conference to present his idea of putting their stuff on the internet and they just didn't get why it would be useful.

    The NCSA mosaic people (not just andreesen, btw) just built on that idea.

  96. Absolutely did NS4 suck by Nimey · · Score: 1

    I was foolish enough to install NC4 right after it went gold. What a slow, unstable POS. I kept with it until about 4.04, then tried Opera 3.1. What a difference on a 486DX2-66 with 12MB of RAM and W95 (in early 1998). I quickly bought a student license and used it as my primary browser until about Mozilla 0.9.

    A small browser like Opera was a godsend on that little box. It had some rendering bugs, but I could most certainly live with that.

    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
  97. We Can Do Without These Things? by Halvy · · Score: 1

    ..Picture a world without Google, without eBay or Amazon or broadband, where few people have even heard of IPOs..

    Google

    I am tired of people STILL acting like Google is a good company. It is NOT. It holds the most websites/links, but that where its uniqueness ends.

    Everytime I type in "quotes" to search, googles sez to take the quotes off. The result then is usually ten's of thousands of links, with the first several nothing but adds or totaly unrelated information (junk).

    10 years ago there was the Yahoos, AltaVistas, which I feel were just as good (bad).

    Amazon.com

    A company who after alllll these years (nearly 10) still has NOT made an *overall* profit, and treats their workers to low wages and abusive harassment?

    Broadband

    We HAD broadband 'back-then' tooo. It was called ISDN and you were able to get it even out in the sticks usually! Besides you didn't NEED broadband back then because there weren't any bittorent programs because there was NO content being published!

    IPO's?

    HAA! Most people STILL don't know (or care) about them, unless they are the few who are either looosing tons of money on them, or government workers (prosecutors & judges) who make a living off the fraudulent activities of these 'Endruns' of the Nazdec!!

    I'm sorry... give me the 'good-ole' daze..when things like Netscape where sooooo refreshing, in that they had the gaul to 'take-on' the Evil Dragoon' Ms (pronounced mizz), before even the big-bad-us-government did.

    But not to fret..those days are comming back-- I can feel it in my WinBind!! :)

    --
    I will gladly loose all of life's battles.. in order to win the war..
  98. Manifest Braggadocio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kinda like "Mission Accomplished!"?

  99. Whoa! Dude... by capnspanky · · Score: 1

    ... stop! What MS apologists? MS cought the thing pretty quickly and (unfotunately... or maybe not) back in 95 it was already a WWW leader with their Explorer. Back when the Web was evolving, it was Microsoft that kept adding innovations that are now standards. Sure, Mosaic was the first browser, than there was (is?) Navigator with their frames and the blink (wink ;) tag, but it was MS who was pioneering with the new technologies.

    It was really sad to see Explorer and the 'whole interweb thingy' got aquired by marketing people focused on profits and spreading the MS monpoly. In my opinion IE used to be a great piece of software, probably the only good one that MS had to offer since MS Word 5.1 for Macintosh.

    Anyways, back to the subject. I think you got carried away. You're trying to compress whole 10 years of innovation and progress into a couple of sentences. Let me tell you, it's just disrespect for those who were behind the concepts, the technology and the software during that time. That was progress! What we experiance now is stagnation with all this paranoid focus on security. Developement of new ideas has seized.

    1. Re:Whoa! Dude... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " ... stop! What MS apologists? MS cought the thing pretty quickly and (unfotunately... or maybe not) back in 95 it was already a WWW leader with their Explorer. "

      As someone who wrote web pages in 1996, I call you an MS apologist. The Explorer was lacking features and stability, after testing 3.0 I instantly removed it. Netscape was way better until they sold to AOL and Explorer 5.0 showed up.

  100. Bah! by praedor · · Score: 1

    I remember when the "internet", for regular joes and janes, was essentially bulletin boards. All text-based. I then remember BEFORE Netscape. A real cool app for doing the (modern-style) internet. Let's see...called Mosaic. Yeah, THAT was way cool.


    --
    In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
  101. Um, guys? The web precedes Netscape by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    by quite a few years.

    Just because you never surfed CERN in the good old days, doesn't mean it didn't exist.

    We use LYNX and we LIKED it.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  102. Revisionist history by oncebitten · · Score: 1

    I was out in silicon valley (working on interactive TV at the time), and I call BS on a couple of little "facts" from the article:

    Clark: I viewed the IPO as a marketing event.

    The reason netscape whent public when it did was plain and simple. Clark wanted a bigger boat. Some BSD (big swinging dick), i forget who, had purchased a boat larger than clark's, and clark had to outdo him.

    Giannandrea: The concept that was unusual was doing a beta

    you have got to be freaking kidding me. netscape invented the beta? wrong. a publicly available (ie not a controlled) beta, yes.

    Andreessen: ... The Valley was kind of dormant then. Apple Computer was the walking dead.

    wtf are you talking about, marc? interactive television was something *everyone* was looking at. and the set top boxes were diskless power macs running some obscure new software named quicktime. i'm not a mac guy, but even i had a power mac. oh, and it had this little thing called a tcp/ip stack (which you had to buy from trumpet for windows since WfW was what was out at the time).

    Treuhaft: ... Rob McCool, basically dropped out of college, and he would show up for work in shorts and tube socks and a Megadeth T-shirt. We all think of it as just the way the Valley is now. But I'd been in the Valley for a while, and I hadn't seen that.

    what? netscape invented the dressed down silicon valley dress code too? at oracle we had people in ripped jeans and/or shorts and tie dyes (the reference to jerry garcia's death the day of the netscape IPO reminded me of this).

    the real big deal about netscape was that it had rsa security, so you could do things like bank online (wells fargo was one of the first to use secure sockets for financial transactions).

    and then there's all the previously mentioned stuff about mosaic being in existence, as well as the CERN webserver.

    1. Re:Revisionist history by bwintx · · Score: 0

      From the TFA:
      Netscape goes public on Aug. 9. Its frenzied first day of trading foreshadows the market mania that will follow. (That day also brings a sad event: Grateful Dead leader Jerry Garcia dies. The next morning's San Jose Mercury News played both stories on the front page; Garcia got much more space.)

      Garcia died of a heart attack, and the joke at the time was that his last words were:
      "Netscape opened at what?!?"

      --
      Discussion System prefs link: http://slashdot.org/users.pl?op=editcomm
  103. The way I remember it by Aram+Fingal · · Score: 1

    I don't want to be too negative about this but I have to say that I rue the day when I decided to recommend Netscape Navigator over NCSA Mosaic to end users. Mosaic was open source but I didn't understand the importance of that back then. The Netscape experience has a lot to do with why many of us are so militant in the Free/Open Software movement today.

    Here's my (bitter) memory of the events. Netscape released their software and it lowered the bar for what level of quality was considered OK to release to the public. Lots of companies started releasing buggy software after that. It was a fad. You felt like you were on the bleeding edge of technology if the thing crashed every few minutes. For Mac users, that was the time we started having to run Norton Utilities on a regular basis. It seemed like every day for a while.

    Then, Microsoft decided to compete (or anitcompete) with Netscape and Netscape decided to try and beat Microsoft at their own game. They tried to keep ahead of standards so that web pages written for Netscape Navigator would not work with Internet Explorer. They made Microsoft look like a standards advocate by comparison. We are still cleaning up the mess this made of the WWW.

  104. effortless by mholt108 · · Score: 1

    Yeah i agree. i was working at usyd when mosaic and netscape came out. i thought mosaic was better than the early versions (probably beta) of netscape anyway. The feeling i had at the time, and looking back about the technology was how totally obvious it was, how simple; it hardly seemed like an innovation at all - just something that had always been there just waiting to be used.

    As for netscape, i never really got it, it was a good product but hardly revolutionary or brilliant in a tech sense. It was a great get_rich_quick scheme tho....

  105. Sorry Charlie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That honor goes to the company which provided sockets for windows. Trumpet? Netscape was just repackaging Mosaic for windows, and while it was the better browser for windows for time, it never kept parity with the original NSF project that spawned the company (which is actually pretty surprising), and was a pretty distant third in browser quality by the time Mosaic closed up shop.

    The content generated the interest, and Trumpet Winsock was far more intrumental in getting the people and the content together than Netscape ever was. They were a company with all the money, the vision, in position with an enourmous time advantage in a brand new market, and they still managed to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. I look back at Netscape and still can't believe they managed to implode so brilliantly.

  106. You have no clue what you are talking about by montulli · · Score: 1
    I'm not a huge fan of Marc, having worked with him for four years, but I do know he made attremendous contribution to Mosaic. So much so that I doubt that it would have ever existed had he chosen not to work on it. He and Bina were the only significant contributors at NCSA to Mosaic before it became "popular" and the management at NCSA decided it had been their idea all along.

    If you still think that Netscape "walked away with others ideas", just look at who made up the founding team. Virtually every Mosaic contributer, Marc A, Eric Bina, Aleks Totic, Jon Mittlehouser and Mike McCool who wrote the NCSA httpd and invented CGI, Ari Lutonen from CERN and myself who wrote Lynx. We also extended invitations to other significant members of the Web community, including Tim Berners-Lee, to join us when we started. Together the founding team had more programing hours invested in the Web than everyone else combined, by a very large margin.

    :lou

    1. Re:You have no clue what you are talking about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nicely said. There's a lot of jealousy flying around on this thread, and very little objectivity.

  107. Code Rush on PBS by AnimeFreak · · Score: 1

    I am having a difficult time finding a copy of Code Rush, a documentry released and presented by PBS in 2000. It was a neat documentry on how Mozilla came to be and the struggles the team at Netscape had.

  108. They did, in fact, interview JWZ. by Will+Sargent · · Score: 2, Informative
  109. AJax in Netscape, WebTV, others by OsirisX11 · · Score: 1

    I created something I call CookieRequest:
    http://jameswilson.name/files/creq/index.html

    Very cross browser friendly. Limited to RFC size of cookie, which IE doesn't honor (goes higher).

    Let me know what you guys think.

    Yes I know the site looks like crap.

    OH yeah, its GPL.

  110. of course by ellingswin · · Score: 0

    Of course I remember the birth of the web. After all, I have it on tape.

    --
    I lost my karma, last april fools...
  111. But what about the Microsoft Network? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For a long while the future of the Web wasn't assured. After the launch of the Microsoft Network I remember seeing the cover of a tech magazine with the words in big block letters: MSN: INTERNET KILLER? Lots of companies hedged their bets by building dual sites WWW and MSN sites. Only after WWW's survival seemed assured were the MSN sites (access via Windows systems only) retired.

    Oh, and remember WAIS? That survived even longer.

  112. Yes, I remember it well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was August 1995 when my tiny little company joined the Internet... The first edition of "The Road Ahead" did not have much to say about Internet, BIND still had not been ported to NT 3.51 yet, you could find a 1GB SCSI drive for around $800 and you did not need to worry all that much about leaving your router wide open.

    According to that brand new Netcraft survey we were one of the nearly 19,000 web sites online back then.

    In 2005 we are still tiny, but by grace we are also still here and remain a member of the 676 club (points if you get that reference). It has been quite a ride and it is only just beginning.

  113. yeb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BRING BACK THE TAG!!!