Slashdot Mirror


IGN Interviews Natalie Portman

feller writes "IGN FilmForce has posted an interview with Natalie Portman from yesterday's Comic Con regarding her new film, V For Vendetta (written by Andy and Larry Wachowski, creators of The Matrix trilogy) and also covering everything from misguided fans, to what merits the use of violence, to Portman's own opinions about graphic novels. From the interview: 'Most of the Q&A session was dominated with questions for Natalie Portman, the star of the film. While the questions leveled at her ranged from weird to repetitive, one confused young man asked if starring in movies like Mighty Ducks was different than starring in films like V for Vendetta. Problem is, Ms. Portman never starred in Mighty Ducks. '"

256 comments

  1. Hot grits? by aussie_a · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nothing for you to see here. Please move along.

    Damn! I was hoping for some hot grits too!

    1. Re:Hot grits? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      What is the fascination with her, anyway? She hasn't been in a good movie since Leon and Beautiful Girls and those were both more than a decade ago. All she's done since then is Star Wars (I'm assuming she was in all three new Star Wars films and not jus the first one) and some random crap that nobody has watched or cares about.

      Bruce Campbell I understand. But are all the slashdot fanboys going to get their pants all wet over a chick who's recent roles included playing a pregnant teenage piece of white trash camping out at WalMart with Susan fucking Sarandon?!

    2. Re:Hot grits? by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      What is the fascination with her, anyway?

      To be honest, I didn't quite understand the hot grits phenomena when I made my post. I just got a "Nothing to see here" page (wee! First time ever), so I thought to myself "hey, hot grits tends to be mentioned when an article's about an attractive person, I'll say I was hoping to see hot grits."

      I found it quite amusing when I learnt the hot grits is traditionally centered around Portman.

    3. Re:hot grits? by boisepunk · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slashdot_trolling_phe nomena#Hot_grits.2FNatalie_Portman ...and no, IANATroll, just answering someone's question, and it is ontopic, so there

      --
      main(0)
    4. Re:Hot grits? by SlightOverdose · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think she's actually a pretty good actor. She did a really good job in Garden State.

      That said, she sucked in ep3... but it isn't her fault if lucas is an overrated hack.

    5. Re:Hot grits? by nocomment · · Score: 1

      Ya, the only reason this is "News for Nerds" is that she is the wallpaper for about 60% of the /. community.

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    6. Re:Hot grits? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Nah. Most of the Slashdot community thinks she was at her hottest when she was the little girl in Leon/The Professional. :P

    7. Re:Hot grits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol @ duck face
      STUPID DUCK FACE STUPID DUCK
      loud noises
      dump cold hominy down the back of my shirt

    8. Re:Hot grits? by danbeck · · Score: 1

      She's an Actress, you stoopid AC.

    9. Re:hot grits? by ndogg · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think I might know who the original hot grits guy was, sort of, possibly.

      I used to frequent a site called LinuxNewbie.org back when it was still under the watchful guidance of a guy who went by the pseudonym of Sensei. I remember there being a member called Craig (I think) who posted these zany pictures all the time, and one of them was a Photoshopped picture of Natalie Portman as a statue. People commented on his amazing petrification skills. I think that he may have been the original hot grits troll.

      Anyway, take that with a grain of salt because I'm not absolutely certain. It's mostly speculation.

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    10. Re:Hot grits? by Sparhawk2k · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, actor is often used as a gender-neutral term... So yes she's an actress, but she's also an actor. "A theatrical performer." on Dictionary.com

    11. Re:Hot grits? by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Say 'thespian', and sound a high-brow ingestor of hot grits.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    12. Re:Hot grits? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      What is the fascination with her, anyway? She hasn't been in a good movie since Leon and Beautiful Girls and those were both more than a decade ago. All she's done since then is Star Wars

      The geeks are watching that one for the 'Natalie Portman pants/no-pants continuity error'...

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    13. Re:Hot grits? by Charles+W+Griswold · · Score: 1

      Nah. Most of the Slashdot community thinks she was at her hottest when she was the little girl in Leon/The Professional. :P

      Hey, I resemble that remark! :-P

      Just kidding. :-) Actually, I thought she looked kinda cool in that funky makeup in Episode 1.
      --
      "Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber" -- Plato
    14. Re:Hot grits? by rpdillon · · Score: 1

      I guess you could say that "Closer" and "Garden State" were "random crap that no one cares about", but I actually liked both films. Both above average, IMHO.

      They were particularly interesting because they clearly demonstrated that Natalie can act quite well - when she's not being directed George Lucas, of course.

    15. Re:Hot grits? by Harbinjer · · Score: 1

      It's not so much the directing, as it was the BAD SCRIPT! Much of the dialogue was bad, especially the the "love" scenes. He should've gotten someone to help him with those scenes. If the few really annoying parts were fixed, it would've made episodes 2 and 3 a whole lot better.

      And yeah, "Garden State" was great, and "Closer" was a decent movie too.

    16. Re:Hot grits? by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      I guess I was one of those people who wasnt so impressed by garden state (it felt like it was trying too hard but maybe I should watch it again).

      Closer on the other hand was a fantastic film and the IM scene was absolutely hilarious the first time around (ahh the joys of typing vulgarities in time to music)

      --
      Bottles.
    17. Re:hot grits? by Thomas+Miconi · · Score: 1

      Man, that would be "Natalie Portman naked and petrified". The "hot grits" thing is a semi-independent addition. Wikipedia has more details on this.

      Thomas-

    18. Re:Hot grits? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Never heard of "Closer", but wasn't Garden State a chick flick?

    19. Re:Hot grits? by Skevin · · Score: 1

      over a chick who's recent roles included playing a pregnant teenage piece of white trash camping out at WalMart...

      Yeah, I wasn't too fond of Star Wars Episode III either...

      Solomon Chang

      --
      "Twice half-assed makes an ass whole." --Solomon K. Chang
    20. Re:Hot grits? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      Well, aside from the fact that Susan fucking Sarandon is STILL an MILF in her fifties (I'm in my fifties, so she still counts), Natalie IS a pretty and reasonably smart girl and a fairly talented actress.

      Apparently this movie "Closer" made some impact (I didn't see it since it doesn't involve things exploding or people getting shot or sci-fi or monsters - although I did see "Hitch" without that stuff - mostly because of Eva Mendes, Amber Valletta and the off chance I might learn how to get a date...)

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    21. Re:Hot grits? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      George Lucas' dialog is KNOWN for being bad.

      When Carrie Fisher was doing "script doctor" work for him on the "Young Indiana" series, she constantly got into screaming arguments with him (where words like "asshole" were exchanged, according to her) because she kept telling him, "George, people just do not talk like that!"

      Which is why he doesn't get people to help him with that stuff.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    22. Re:Hot grits? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Still... until she comes out with a movie where she's naked and petrified in a vat of hot grits, reciting deCSS code, I'm not interested.

      I really haven't had the slightest interest in anything she's done since Leon. She was really good in that movie - beyond it just being a good movie to begin with. But since then, it seems like she's just done fairly bland, uninteresting things (and again, StarWars doesnt' count because nobody turns down StarWars).

      I'd like to see if she has the balls to do something more independant and less mainstream. Something gritty and intriguing and unexpected. Otherwise - and until then - I'll have a hard time differentiating her from any other bland young starlette of average talent that does whatever scripts are thrown at her.

    23. Re:Hot grits? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      One thing you need to remember: actresses don't run the studio system. Studio heads and movie producers do.

      Young actresses like Natalie don't get to pick and choose as easily as established actresses - unless they're independently wealthy from other means like Andrea Corr.

      Andrea turned down the "Doctor Zhivago" remake because, first of all, it was too raunchy for an Irish Catholic girl, and secondly, it was too big a role for a first role. She can afford to do this since she's worth at least 4 million pounds from being a rock star. She picked a little indie film, "The Boys and Girl From County Clare" as her first role, and got a "Best Actress in a Comedy Film" award from the HBO Comedy Film Festival - not bad for a first role. Now she has a indie 25-minute short ("The Bridge") being shown at film festivals and possibly being shopped around for an Oscar nomination. So far, she's not even on the public's radar screen as an actress, but is likely to have a very successful career since she CAN afford to pick and choose her roles.

      Jodie Foster did a dozen or more bland, uninteresting movies until she got "The Accused" and "Silence of the Lambs." She almost quit the business before "Accused" - and wouldn't have minded, since she never wanted to be an actress anyway. In fact, she's basically retired today, doing just the odd sleep-walk-through-it thriller like "Panic Room" and the new "Flight Plan" movie to keep up her life style.

      As an interesting aside, Jodie was the backup to Carrie Fisher for the original Star Wars films. If Fisher, Ford and Hamill hadn't worked out as a team, Lucas had a backup team, supposedly, according to a Carrie Fisher interview I read. Had Jodie gotten that role, it might have significantly changed her career path and put her on the same sort of track Portman is on.

      Winona Ryder is another very talented young actress who managed to land several interesting roles early on, but has subsequently found it very hard to get anything interesting. "Girl, Interrupted" (which she produced) was a success, since she got good reviews and her co-star Angelina Jolie got a Best Supporting Oscar win. But everything since has been trashed by the critics and ignored by the public. Since the shoplifting affair (a rail-roading if ever I ever heard of one), she's had even less success getting serious roles.

      In other words, where Natalie is concerned, people just have to wait and see. She's only 24 - she's got a good fifteen years of career left yet. Foster was going nowhere until 27 or 28.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    24. Re:Hot grits? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but in another 10 years she'll be too old and face-lifted (and boob-lifted) for anyone to be interested. Why does she have to be hot OR in good films? She should be hot IN good films.

      I mean, really, in another decade I'll be wanting to put my hot grits on a petrified Hermione Granger. :P

    25. Re:Hot grits? by connorbd · · Score: 1

      Lucas' original dialog is in the novelization of "A New Hope". It's really, really bad -- according to the Annotated Screenplays book most of the good dialog was script doctored in after Alan Dean Foster ghostwrote the novelization, nothing to do with Lucas.

    26. Re:Hot grits? by Inthewire · · Score: 0

      Foster was going nowhere until 27 or 28.

      Yeah, she really stunk up Taxi Driver.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
  2. Totally Lost by Jeet81 · · Score: 1

    I am totally lost. What is this story about? Could someone explain please.

    1. Re:Totally Lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A stupit c*nt who can't act.

  3. HAHAHA... I was waiting for the same post... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some trolls are classic.

  4. news for nerds? by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I really thought this was a "news for nerds, stuff that maters" site... I would wager that the majority of the rest of the Slashdot readership is asking themselves the same thing I am:

    WHO THE FUCK CARES?

    If I wanted to see fluff garbage from some Hollywood celeb trash, I would turn on the E! channel, like the wife does every 20 minutes... Now I gota see it on Slashdot. Damn!

    --
    bash: rtfm: command not found
    1. Re:news for nerds? by helioquake · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey, if this isn't news for horny nerds, I don't know what would.

    2. Re:news for nerds? by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey, if this isn't news for horny nerds, I don't know what would.

      It is also apparently news for people with little or no language skills :) *ducks*

      --
      bash: rtfm: command not found
    3. Re:news for nerds? by Rickler · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Heh; yea, I agree.

      --

      The human race is artificial intelligence created using object orientated programming.
    4. Re:news for nerds? by MavEtJu · · Score: 1, Insightful

      WHO THE FUCK CARES?

      If you don't care, don't read and don't post. Very easy, very simple.

      --
      bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
    5. Re:news for nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I care. I care deeply. I care passionately.

    6. Re:news for nerds? by 91degrees · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's Natalie Portman, man! Have you no sense of history?

      That, Hot Grits, and Beowulf clusters are the only things that matter!

    7. Re:news for nerds? by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Seconded. NO interest in Natalie Portman, here. Can anyone recommend an IT news site that sticks to IT news (preferably with discussion board attached).

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    8. Re:news for nerds? by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 1

      Hey, unless she's gonna get nekkid and feed me hot grits while I sit atop a BSD beowulf cluster from Soviet Russia that according to Netcraft is dead, I still don't care ;)

      --
      bash: rtfm: command not found
    9. Re:news for nerds? by Vermifax · · Score: 4, Informative

      What made you think this was an IT news site.

      Its not, never was and never was meant to be.

      Go read the faq.

      --

      Vermifax

      Logout
    10. Re:news for nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently a few members of slashdot care and are not inhibited about posting their nude Natalie Portman in grits fantasies. Next up: Slashdot interview of Natalie Portman with questions from /.rs

    11. Re:news for nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The post is valid "News for Nerds" because the subject is an Alan Moore graphic novel. I would imagine that if you're a reg here, you would at least be familiar with either Watchmen or V for Vendetta (although I'm partial to his HellBlazer run).

      Furthermore, this post is front page worthy because of a certain lady that has hot grits in her pants...

    12. Re:news for nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a site that is more up to date and read daily by myself (but not in English)

      http://www.heise.de/

      it even has a discussion system, not the same format as slashdot, but it exists nonetheless.

    13. Re:news for nerds? by Procyon101 · · Score: 1

      No respect for th OSM!

      I'm gunna send unload ninja's with pancakes on his ass.

    14. Re:news for nerds? by Procyon101 · · Score: 1

      Dude, she'd be so Petrified

    15. Re:news for nerds? by ndogg · · Score: 1

      I care...because my hot grits have been waiting for such a long time. Shoot, I gotta reheat them.

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    16. Re:news for nerds? by ndogg · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      If I wanted to see fluff garbage from some Hollywood celeb trash, I would turn on the E! channel, like the wife does every 20 minutes...

      Sorry, but I gotta ask. Why would you marry someone so concerned with such frivolity?
      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    17. Re:news for nerds? by slashdot.org · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you don't care, don't read and don't post. Very easy, very simple.

      I disagree. Posting comments like that is the easiest and arguably the best way for readers to indicate that they don't like the direction in which a site like /. is heading. (provided of course the editors ever actually read comments...)

      I got a similar reply as yours to a comment I placed about the 'Bruce Campbell' story.

      Of course I don't have to read that article nor this one. But it seems fair to bitch about it when a place you frequent for a certain type of information seems to take a weird turn and start reporting on stuff that you really don't care about.

      The comment system is specifically designed to moderate comments that aren't appreciated, and the OP got mod'd +5, so obviously (s)he is not the only one feeling that way.

      In other words; I appreciate a lot of stuff that gets posted on /. and I really would like to continue reading it. But without trying to sound too dramatic, between these type of stories, the dupes and the stories that are rediculously biased and/or plain flamebait, I'm starting to wonder what's happening to good ole /.

      I mean, you gotta honestly wonder if Taco (& the others) are really actively working on this site anymore.

    18. Re:news for nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It pours the grits down its pants. It does not eat the grits. It pours the grits down its fucking pants, bitch. Put the lotion in the basket!

    19. Re:news for nerds? by koreaman · · Score: 0

      sets you up the bomb

    20. Re:news for nerds? by noidentity · · Score: 1

      If you don't care, don't read and don't post. Very easy, very simple.

      What a tired, incorrect response. I think the original poster cares about Slashdot's content. If one simply ignores what isn't interesting, the direction Slashdot takes will be decided by others.

    21. Re:news for nerds? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 3, Funny

      *ducks*

      If you RTFA, you'll find ducks are specifically referred to as NOT being relevant. Not even mighty ones.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    22. Re:news for nerds? by geekboy642 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is a fork bomb, and a fairly nasty one.

      In bash, if you type function() {commands; more commands}, it's defining a that you can later call by typing 'function'.

      So ":() {" defines a function called ':'. The function recurses by calling itself inside the curly brackets '{ :', then for added viciousness calls itself again as a filter '|:'. The whole thing also runs as a background job '&', which means it will keep spawning even faster. '};' ends the function and tells bash to expect another command--the first part only defined the fork bomb, but didn't run it.
      The last character is a call to the ':' function.
      On a modern linux system, this will eat about fourty minutes of hard blocking CPU time, if you simultaneously trigger the fork bomb and set off a command to kill it(ask me how I know this).

      And to prevent fork bombs, see man ulimit.

      -- Da (helpful) geekboy

      --
      Just another "DOJ fascist authoritarian totalitarian bootlicker" -- Zeio
    23. Re:news for nerds? by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      ive been meaning to set a limit on processes for a while (after my friend showed me that fork bomb)

      is there a way to set ulimit without writing code? here's man ulimit from debian etch:

      SYNOPSIS
      #include

      long ulimit(int cmd, long newlimit);

      DESCRIPTION
      Warning: This routine is obsolete. The include file is no longer provided by glibc. Use getrlimit(2), setrlimit(2) and
      sysconf(3) instead. For the shell command ulimit, see bash(1).

    24. Re:news for nerds? by dalutong · · Score: 1

      hah. i feel sorry for anyone who runs that while they're in the middle of something important or that is unsaved.

      i ran it after closing everything down. sure enough, my system was stopped within minutes. I couldn't kill it.

      and what's ulimit? i don't have that installed. and apt-cache search ulimit didn't give me anything.

      --

      What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?
    25. Re:news for nerds? by Haeleth · · Score: 1

      is there a way to set ulimit without writing code? here's man ulimit from debian etch:
      [snip]
      For the shell command ulimit, see bash(1).

      Hmm, do you see anything there that might be pertinent?

      (Hint, in case you're new to *nix: type "man bash", and then "/ulimit".)

    26. Re:news for nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      English news section of heise exists. Not carrying all articles, but here: http://www.heise.de/english/ anyway.

    27. Re:news for nerds? by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      im not new to *nix, ive been using linux for about 3 years now, that manpage looks like its just info about an include file and i dont think ive ever come across that. i'l gander at that though, thanks.

    28. Re:news for nerds? by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      YEAH!!!:

      bob@monkey:~$ :(){ :|:&};:
      [1] 8478
      bash: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable
      bash: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable
      bash: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable
      bash: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable
      bash: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable
      bob@monkey:~$ bash: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable

      [1]+ Exit 128 : | :

    29. Re:news for nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're new here, aren't you?

      Natalie Portman has been a vital part of /. for years now. Especially if she's petrified.

    30. Re:news for nerds? by tsadi · · Score: 1

      Flamebait? If I had mod points I would have modded this "Insightful"!

    31. Re:news for nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll be new to *nix if you ever ditch that *nux and start running UNIX.

    32. Re:news for nerds? by SA+Stevens · · Score: 1

      It's Natalie Portman, man! Have you no sense of history?


      Yes. I have a sense of history, and little tolerance for the newbies who pasted in Natalie Portman. The original concept was 'Mae Ling Mak, Naked and Petrified' and it gradually morphed over to the hollywood ditz.

    33. Re:news for nerds? by SA+Stevens · · Score: 1

      I run into this 'IT' problem all the time. Being that I am an electronic technologist with design experience designing in and programming embedded controllers, I run into recruiters and HR flacks who assume I am involved in fucking IT.

      Far from it. IT are the janitors. They're the modern equivalent of file clerks. Any developer or technical person knows this.

    34. Re:news for nerds? by SA+Stevens · · Score: 1

      And naked!

    35. Re:news for nerds? by jayloden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While I understand where you are coming from, I think you - and the parent - are missing a key point.

      Natalie Portman starred in the new Star Wars movies and thousands of geeks (including a lot here on /.) have a huge crush on her.

      Bruce Campbell is the star of such geek classics as Evil Dead (Army of Darkness).

      So yes, you're right, Hollywood celebrities are on /. - but they're celebrities that lots of us geeks are familiar with and fans of. I'd argue that it does count as "news for (some) nerds", "stuff that matters (to some)".

    36. Re:news for nerds? by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      I mean, you gotta honestly wonder if Taco (& the others) are really actively working on this site anymore.

      Ever heard of the concept of a "slow news day"? Sometimes there just isn't enough cool shit to fill a day's worth of stories. It ain't some grand cornspiracy.

    37. Re:news for nerds? by Anonymous+Cow+herd · · Score: 1

      Er... should be installed by default. Basically a way to limit userland resource use (CPU, memory/swap, process run times, etc...)

      --
      Ita erat quando hic adveni.
    38. Re:news for nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, lets get back to hearing about Linus Torvalds, ESR, Steve Jobs and those Google guys.

    39. Re:news for nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what is up with slashdot posters and the misspelled word rediculous? it does not exist. get over it and start spelling it the right way- ridiculous.

    40. Re:news for nerds? by Deagol · · Score: 1
      I feel your pain. Tomorrow, will there be a headline touting an interview with the head of Quaker's grits division.

      Quite sad.

    41. Re:news for nerds? by synthespian · · Score: 1

      Apparently, Zonk is a huge fan of Natalie Portman.

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    42. Re:news for nerds? by RJNFC · · Score: 1

      I'm sticking my neck out here, but I believe it's "little or no language skill" (singular) or, possibly, "few language skills" (plural).

    43. Re:news for nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd generally want one of the other ulimits...a program, for instance. Try man -a ulimit, to see all of them one after the other...which means that the first man page lies viciously through its digital teeth.

      See the file /etc/security/limits.conf, if you have PAM installed, which lets you do much the same thing as ulimit, but easier and more flexibly.

    44. Re:news for nerds? by dr.badass · · Score: 1

      ErichTheWebGuy (745925)

      Your UID is obviously way to high to understand.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    45. Re:news for nerds? by dr.badass · · Score: 1

      Can anyone recommend an IT news site that sticks to IT news (preferably with discussion board attached).

      Sections are your friend: it.slashdot.org

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    46. Re:news for nerds? by Krach42 · · Score: 1

      I have to agree. When Slashdot starts posting stories about celebs that we have no chance of knowing, or really even caring about.

      Not knowing: hell, I don't know... but if I've not heard the name, then obviously it's not a popular actor/ress among geeks.

      Not really caring about: Leonardo DiCapprio.

      I mean, come on, if Slashdot were to post a story about Leo here... OMG the masses would rise of and DESTROY.

      Natalie Portman is- on the other hand- hot, and geek-known. So, she may get an article on Slashdot. But not any dupes!

      --

      I am unamerican, and proud of it!
    47. Re:news for nerds? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      "provided of course the editors ever actually read comments..."

      Well, that eliminates your concept from serious consideration, doesn't it?

      As for "start reporting on stuff that you really don't care about", exactly which articles am I supposed to care about? I see half the articles on the front page as crap I don't care about every single day. Obviously some nerds care about some of the more pointless technical hacks of weird devices, because those articles get several hundred comments.

      If everybody complained about seeing articles they didn't like, the editors would have even less time to not read the dupes.

      "I mean, you gotta honestly wonder if Taco (& the others) are really actively working on this site anymore."

      Didn't Taco drop dead a few years ago? I guess that news wasn't "stuff that matters".

      Or maybe it was a dupe.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    48. Re:news for nerds? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      "If one simply ignores what isn't interesting, the direction Slashdot takes will be decided by others."

      The problem is, if one does not ignore what isn't interesting, the additional comments posted will enable the direction Slashdot takes to be decided by others, also.

      The bottom line: nobody controls /. except the trolls and the advertisers. Just like everywhere else. Get used to it, because you damn sure ain't going to change it. Start your own if you don't like it - I will.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    49. Re:news for nerds? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      "Next up: Slashdot interview of Natalie Portman with questions from /.rs"

      Which, being more intelligent than anybody on /., she would ignore completely, so the interview questions would be up on the list for a year before some editor noticed and quietly took them down.

      Most of those interviews have been so completely useless that the whole concept should be dropped. Once Cringeley's NerdTV comes out, substitute that for these pointless /. interviews.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    50. Re:news for nerds? by Stankatz · · Score: 1

      what r u talking bout ??? i would of modded you overratted if i had mod points !!! everyone nose slashdoters have excelent language skilz

    51. Re:news for nerds? by connorbd · · Score: 1

      Which version? HP-UX? (Open)Solaris? MacOS X? SCOw Unixware? One of the BSDs?

      If there's one thing that's constant about Unix it's interface diversity...

    52. Re:news for nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe it's "little or no language skill" (singular)
      language is a collection of skills (plural)

      but good try though :)

      ps - looking for language skills in my post is useless, as i am a dog

      pps - woof woof rrah woof rurrr grits!

  5. Bring it on by ottffssent · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hot grits and all. We can take it. Let's hear from the old-school trolls.

    Come on, now's your chance. It's on-topic, even!

    I want to wake up this morning with 50 hot grits replies to this comment. I know you can do it, guys.

    Bring it on!

    1. Re:Bring it on by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      I was going to post "they didn't even talk about hot grits," but decided not to after seeing this.

    2. Re:Bring it on by eclectro · · Score: 1

      I want to wake up this morning with 50 hot grits replies to this comment

      Natalie apparently has some troubling hot grits here.

      This petrified me and I have since lost interest.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  6. CBG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Worst -- Interview -- Ever.

  7. Portman pics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  8. Hyper-intellectual writing? by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

    No offense to Portman, but have I been reading wrong graphic novels?
    Hyper-intellectual? WTF?

    And here I thought reading Joe Sacco's series and Maus gave me the right to wear a monnocle!

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    1. Re:Hyper-intellectual writing? by 91degrees · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No offense to Portman, but have I been reading wrong graphic novels?

      Dunno. Have you read V for Vendetta? There are a lot of historical and literary references ranging from Homer and Shakespeare to the Rolling Stones. Maybe Hyper-intellectual is a bit of an exaggeration, but they're certainly intellectual.

      Alan Moore is quite clearly trying to turn the comic book into a recognised an artform in its own right.

    2. Re:Hyper-intellectual writing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For "is" read "was". He retired from writing comics last year to spend more time with his snake-puppet god magick. And since 1990 he was doing his best to dumb-down comics with the likes of 1963 and Tom Strong. His eighties stuff had a whiff of what Grant Morrison called something like "Referncing Shelley and Nietschze to dignify the same old costumed claptrap" but was nonetheless excellent.

    3. Re:Hyper-intellectual writing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe Hyper-intellectual is a bit of an exaggeration

      Dude, we're talking about Hollywood standards here, by which "The Matrix" is considered to be on the level of Spinoza.

    4. Re:Hyper-intellectual writing? by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Hyper-intellectual? WTF?

      They are if you're a vacuous Hollywood bimbo who only got into an ivy-league school because you're famous.

      And don't you DARE laugh, Brook Shields!

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  9. Writers of the Matrix? by aussie_a · · Score: 4, Interesting

    written by Andy and Larry Wachowski, creators of The Matrix trilogy

    More like the plagarisers of the matrix.

    I should clarify that. I believe they did write the Matrix 2 and 3. But I believe Sophia Stewart's claim that they stole her idea (especially for the first movie). The second and third movies are so pathetic, that it's obvious to anyone who has seen the movies that they weren't written by the same people.

    1. Re:Writers of the Matrix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "that it's obvious to anyone who has seen the movies that they weren't written by the same people."
      It is now that you mention it, thank you!

    2. Re:Writers of the Matrix? by incom · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "The case also targets the producers of the Terminator franchise."

      With the date difference between the matrix and the terminator, I'd say she just wrote a script about governing computer mainframes and machines in the 70's, submitted it to a bunch of people, noticed some story similarities, and obsessively thought they stole her work...lawyers...profit!!!
      --
      True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
    3. Re:Writers of the Matrix? by xor.pt · · Score: 0

      Now there's news for some nerds, stuff that matters, nice to see i'm not the only one who actually knows this.

      This case was actually known by the time of the release of the first Matrix movie, but Warner Bros has been covering this up so they could make all the profit possible before it blew up.

      I for one wouldn't mind the aditional accuracy in the OP:
      "(allegedly written by Andy and Larry Wachowski, creators of The Matrix trilogy)"
      With the word "allegedly" linking to that little piece of information on wikipedia.

    4. Re:Writers of the Matrix? by xor.pt · · Score: 0

      Actually the aditional accuracy, ironically, is wrong. "(written by Andy and Larry Wachowski, alleged creators of The Matrix trilogy)"

    5. Re:Writers of the Matrix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since your post is under the GPL...

      written by Andy and Larry Wachowski, creators of The Matrix trilogy

      I should clarify that. I believe they did write the Matrix 2 and 3. But I believe Sophia Stewart's claim that they stole her idea (especially for the first movie). The second and third movies are so pathetic, that it's obvious to anyone who has seen the movies that they weren't written by the same people.

    6. Re:Writers of the Matrix? by strider44 · · Score: 1

      She's also sueing the Terminator for the same script. Seeing as how the only overlap between the Terminator and the Matrix is the sentient computer I gather that's what the lawsuit is about. And seeing as how a three year old playing an X-Box could have thought up this idea, I have as much or more of a right to call her a litigious bitchy arsehole trying to legally steal other peoples money as you have calling Andy and Larry Wachowski plagerisers.

    7. Re:Writers of the Matrix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She's also sueing the Terminator for the same script.

      Well, that's just silly. How can you sue a fictional character?

    8. Re:Writers of the Matrix? by AliasMoze · · Score: 1

      I would need more convincing to say that either Cameron's or the Wachowski Brothers' movies had anything at all to do with this lady's work. I read the parts of her manuscript I could find, and the ideas that overlap with "The Terminator" or "The Matrix" are really generally sci-fi fodder. I mean, part of her evidence was a character called "The One". I guess she should go after George Lucas next.

    9. Re:Writers of the Matrix? by whatever3003 · · Score: 2, Informative
      There is part of an interview with Sophia Stewart (linked from the wikipedia article) that helps understand the similarities a bit better.

      She sounds a little hysterical in the first two questions, but her illustration of the differences between the movies is quite interesting ... especially that Arnie quote ;)

      I would like to read that book of hers though...

      --
      "Those who do not want to imitate anything, produce nothing." -- Salvador Dali
    10. Re:Writers of the Matrix? by kryten_nl · · Score: 1

      ...part of her evidence was a character called "The One". I guess she should go after George Lucas next.
      And christianity after that...

      --
      For the perfect anti-Unix, write an OS that thinks it knows what you're doing better than you do and let it be wrong.
    11. Re:Writers of the Matrix? by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      In the interview, Sophia Stewart claims she sent the Wachowski Brothers her manuscript for "Third Eye" in or around 1986. The Terminator (the original movie) was released in 1984 according to the IMDB entry (and thus must have been in production since at least 1982, movies don't get made overnight ya know).

      My first thought was, did she then send her manuscript back in time by 4 years? Okay, so I dismissed her initially too. But then she does say her manuscript was written by 1981, so there is at least a window of possibility when this could have happened.

      Doing a little more poking around, some other interesting things that I gleaned from IMDB's trivia page for The Terminator - apparently there was already a lawsuit for that script by Harlan Ellison, with whom James Cameron reached a settlement that included giving him script writing credits for supposedly having used parts of two Ellison-written episodes of the Outer Limits and a short story.

      The one thing that does make me suspicious is this blurb: "The initial draft for the movie was sold to Cameron's wife, Gale Anne Hurd for the price of $1 only."

      But the primary script writing credit is given to James Cameron and Gale Anne Hurd. So why no credit for the person they supposedly bought the original script from?

      At the very least it sounds like there might be some suspect lineage to the Terminator script as well. So maybe she's not entirely crazy, and maybe this isn't just a case of generally similar sci-fi themes in scripts originating from different sources.

    12. Re:Writers of the Matrix? by Silverlancer · · Score: 1

      The third was wasn't original either. In episode 6 of Neon Genesis Evangelion, the fourth Angel drills down to NERV HQ with a device that looks mysteriously like the one used in Revolutions. Of course, as in Evangelion, only one man could save the day!

    13. Re:Writers of the Matrix? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      The second and third movies are so pathetic, that it's obvious to anyone who has seen the movies that they weren't written by the same people.

      You know something, I could say that about Jurassic Park as well. Or Star Wars. But that doesn't make it the correct assumption. People like to believe someone who has done good movies will never do bad ones, but that's really not how it works. The best creative minds in the world write crap sometimes, and the worst can still occasionally come up with something good.

      It's entirely possible the Wachowskis had one good idea for a movie (the original), and simply couldn't come up with another.

      I'm not saying Sophia Stewart is lying, but I'd want a lot more evidence than just the fact that the sequals were lowsy.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    14. Re:Writers of the Matrix? by jnik · · Score: 1

      I guess she should go after George Lucas next.
      Or JMS. "Not the One. Not the One."

    15. Re:Writers of the Matrix? by LS · · Score: 1

      You know who they REALLY plagerized the Matrix from? The New Twilight Zone, specifically an episode from the first season, called "Dreams for Sale". See Here.

      The story includes a person not knowing they are in a matrix, and waking up in a giant hive of reality creating machines, that looks suspisciously like the ones in the Matrix movies, except it's all white instead of all black. She even sees things repeating, just like the cat glitch in the first Matrix.

      Except that this episode was shown in 1985... mega fishy if you ask me.

      LS

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    16. Re:Writers of the Matrix? by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Well, you can go after the money he got from all those fitness mags.

    17. Re:Writers of the Matrix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll have to go back further than that. The general idea behind the Matrix, Vanilla Sky, and that Twilight Zone episode is taken from a classic thought experiment in philosophy to prove the existence of altruism, put forth by Novick in 1974 (I think). It's called the experience machine. Basically, if given the choice of living in a perfect Matrix-like world where all your dreams come true and living in the real world, most people would choose the real world. If all you cared about was yourself and altruism didn't exist, then why would this be? Granted, all those movies add quite a bit of story to the experience machine idea, but the basic element of each is from this thought experiment. Anyone who's taken an intro philosophy course in college has probably come across it.

      Google for "'experience machine' altruism Novick" for more info.

    18. Re:Writers of the Matrix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      But I believe Sophia Stewart's claim that they stole her idea (especially for the first movie).

      Do you also believe her claim that she's a divine prophet, and that God wants her to be one of the richest people on the planet? Or that there are "secret" early versions of the DVD that have scenes in them that were modified in later versions to cover up plagarism? (i.e., that the film you saw in theaters and the DVD have significant differences that nobody but she knows about). Or that she had to fire her lawyers because they were being bribed by the studios?

      Don't believe everything you read. The woman's a kook trying to get enormously rich.

    19. Re:Writers of the Matrix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like to read that book of hers though...

      According to her website at Da Ghetto Tymez, it'll cost you $100. That's about the going rate for divine prophesy from a servant of God (as she occasionally claims to be outside of court). No charlatans here, no sir.

    20. Re:Writers of the Matrix? by OzRoy · · Score: 1

      From an article I read ages ago, she has never seen the terminator movies. She took the case to the FBI and asked them to investigate the Matrix for her. They came back to her and said "Yes you have a case, it looks like the Matrix was stolen from you, and so was Terminator".

  10. That was an interview? by noewun · · Score: 2, Funny

    Jeff Gannon asked Scott McClellan more interesting questions.

    --
    I am a believer of momentum and curves.
  11. Since theres finally a topic on N. Portman... by metricmusic · · Score: 2, Funny

    I might as well ask, what the story behind her and hot Grits?

    --
    http://www.livejournal.com/users/metricmusic
    1. Re:Since theres finally a topic on N. Portman... by Recovering+Hater · · Score: 5, Informative

      Because you asked: The "hot grits" and Natalie Portman goes back a little ways on /. It's an old troll and here is a wikipedia link explaining it better than I could. Have fun reading all about weird fetishes. :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slashdot_trolling_phe nomena#Hot_grits.2FNatalie_Portman

      --
      My humor is probably your flamebait
    2. Re:Since theres finally a topic on N. Portman... by dtfinch · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Since theres finally a topic on N. Portman... by eclectro · · Score: 1

      I think that the user that started this troll was OSM, or open source man. Sometimes he was troll, other times he wasn't. Compared with todays trolls he really wasn't. If not him, one of his aquaintances for sure.

      He wrote a couple of very funny essays, some a little off color and R rated, but nowhere near the level of trolling that you see with the gnaa ilk.

      Anyway, he started the whole "petrified" bit that was added on to the "hot grits".

      It became such a large meme that I think slashcode was modified so anononymous posters could not make Natalie Portman-hot grits and petrified posts.

      For me, I lost interest in Ms. Portman when I saw that picture of her scratching her butt while on the cell phone. Truly iconic. Does anybody have a link to this?

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    4. Re:Since theres finally a topic on N. Portman... by Comatose51 · · Score: 1

      Has anyone ever brought that to her attention? I wonder.

      --
      EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    5. Re:Since theres finally a topic on N. Portman... by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      For me, I lost interest in Ms. Portman when I saw that picture of her scratching her butt while on the cell phone. Truly iconic. Does anybody have a link to this?

      http://perso.wanadoo.fr/jps/nat23.jpg

      That's just sick. It looks like she's in up to her wrist. I hope it's a fake.

    6. Re:Since theres finally a topic on N. Portman... by Hast · · Score: 1

      Looks like a fake to me.

      She has tight jeans on but is still able to put her hand in there? No way...

      Of course, she could have specially tailored jeans with really tight legs and the belt size of a 200 pund guy. I guess that would make the picture possible.

  12. Down with Grits, up with Matzoh by Nomihn0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Please, no more grits. She's a nice, Northeastern, Jewish girl who deserves better. I propose matzoh meal.

    Natalie Portman petrified in hot matzoh meal. . .

    Has a nice ring to it, neh?

    1. Re:Down with Grits, up with Matzoh by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      s/matzoh meal/kasha/

  13. Invading Mexico? by ObitMan · · Score: 1

    Sign me up.
    I'm out of Tequila.

    --
    Who run Barter Town?
    1. Re:Invading Mexico? by jcuervo · · Score: 1

      Just go down to Home Depot... :P

      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  14. Lovely IGN by aaron_ds · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm so happy that the International Grits Network is interviewing its biggest star!

    1. Re:Lovely IGN by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      Worst part is, IGN's ads. They finally stopped popping up actual new windows, so now they pop up an ad in the same window, on top of the content of the second page, that won't be moved.

      I'm using Mozilla 1.7.8. Is anyone else having this problem?

      I think it's high time that Slashdot boycott IGN. I know I personally will throw in a proxy rule for that very purpose. Who's with me?

      If we can't flood their bandwidth, the least we can do is starve their ad revenues.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  15. hot grits? by 5n3ak3rp1mp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    soon after i started reading slashdot ages ago, i saw references to portman and hot grits and never got a clue what the heck kind of slashdot cultural reference that was. can someone bother to enlighten me?

    but hey, all I am is a guy who had a guy in his fraternity date some gal named Tisch who was one of portman's (not her real name, though the actual name escapes me) good friends.

  16. In my mind... by DanThe1Man · · Score: 2, Funny

    Portman stared in a lot of porn movies too.

    1. Re:In my mind... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Portman stared in a lot of porn movies too.

      I stare at a lot of porn movies too.

    2. Re:In my mind... by Alsee · · Score: 2, Funny

      And one of them was "The Mighty Ducks".

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    3. Re:In my mind... by el_chicano · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that be "The Mighty Dicks"? :-)

      --
      A man who wants nothing is invincible
    4. Re:In my mind... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, I would have changed the D in "Ducks", but hey, maybe that's just me...

  17. Alan Moore didn't like this movie by Dionysus · · Score: 4, Informative

    Usually, Alan Moore, who wrote the graphic novels, doesn't comment on the quality of the movies that are made based on his stories. This is the first movie he actually slammed, and the reason we won't see any more Hollywood movies based on his stories (nor will he work with DC Comics again)

    source

    --
    Je ne parle pas francais.
    1. Re:Alan Moore didn't like this movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Did you even read the article you linked to? Alan Moore doesn't want to be associated with that movie because they attempted to use his name as a selling point for the movie. He hasn't even seen the movie, let alone have an opinion on it.

      Granted, I haven't got high hopes for V. I don't see a movie about the violent overthrowing of a totalitarian Western government going over too well in this political climate. Might be too close to comfort for some producers.

  18. It's all about the hot, hot grits, baby. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Naked, petrified, hot grits.

    Sometimes underpants.

    Dig?

  19. Bah, quit yer whining! by floydian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While everyone's all "wah, what is slashdot coming to, why do I need to know what some so-called actress says", I'd like to remind you that Ms. Portman has long been a geekboy fantasy, and as such is entitled to a place of honor in good'ole Slashdot.

    Plus, I challenge any red-blooded geek to see the film Garden State and not fall in love with the woman. I mean it; you really should check out that movie, the quirky, original script alone makes it worth it.

    1. Re:Bah, quit yer whining! by nate85 · · Score: 1

      Definitely a great movie, you get a whole new respect for her after seeing it.

  20. One big flirt. by aussie_a · · Score: 0

    Gees, the IGN reporter is just constantly flirting with Natalie Portman through the entire interview. Here are some quotes to show what I mean, along with Natalie's answer.

    IGN: How old are you?
    Natalie: I'm 24.
    IGN: Cool! Now, let's get to why we're here.
    IGN: Has it turned you on
    Natalie: Not so much
    IGN: You just broke a million hearts
    IGN: How do you feel
    Natalie: scary
    IGN: do you feel pressure
    Natalie: yeah
    IGN: Have you ever?
    Natalie: Yeah IGN: It's about time
    IGN: Do you feel like you would ever .. for a stranger
    Natalie: No.
    IGN: I think I'm with you on that one.


    Pretty intimate conversation if you ask me!

  21. Natalie Portman is SUCH a great actress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really love the way she delivers the lines, and uh, she's so, uh, emotive, and uh, uhhh, ohhh, OHHHHHHH!!!!!!!

    Huh. She's not so interesting any more. Give 'Mr. Happy' a few hours and she might be..

  22. NATALIE PORTMAN NAKED AND PETRIFIED by spaceorb · · Score: 4, Funny

    What, no one remembers this line?

    1. Re:NATALIE PORTMAN NAKED AND PETRIFIED by p0 · · Score: 1

      Uh well imagine a ...

      nevermind.

      --
      This is my sig. There are thousands more, but this one is mine.
    2. Re:NATALIE PORTMAN NAKED AND PETRIFIED by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      In Slashdot Korea, only old people remember that line.

      (Hint: it's a double-entendre.)

  23. Invading Mexico by pherthyl · · Score: 1

    "It's about time we moved in on them."

    Wow.. Just wow. WTF?

    1. Re:Invading Mexico by ryanov · · Score: 1

      I think considering the way the world works nowadays, that this was pretty amusing.

    2. Re:Invading Mexico by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 1

      It was a jest. People in the US joke about invasions from and into Canada and Mexico all the time.

    3. Re:Invading Mexico by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. And they joke about invading Central America, Iraq.....

      US Americans have a fantastic sense of humor.

  24. Worst Interview Ever by no1here · · Score: 2, Funny

    As a Natalie Portman fan I was extremely disappointed with that interview. It didn't seem like it delved much into the graphic novel, and Natalie wasn't asked any interesting questions. Plus, there was no picture of her on the interview page. That was a major minus.

  25. She's skinny enough by wormeyman · · Score: 1

    She's skinny enough why would she feel the need to lose more weight? http://vforvendetta.warnerbros.com/cmp/press_portm an_03_640.html

    1. Re:She's skinny enough by confusednoise · · Score: 1

      Read the novel. The character she plays spends time interned in a detention/concentration camp.

  26. Natalie Who? by pipingguy · · Score: 1


    She was quite good in The Professional, I haven't seen or recognized her in anything that was worthwhile watching since then.

    1. Re:Natalie Who? by antic · · Score: 3, Insightful


      Have you seen Closer? Not a bad film. Garden State is decent too.

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
  27. what...? by etheriel · · Score: 1

    two half pages of divel.

    no link to the trailer, or any other information about this movie..

    how the fuck is the news worthy?

  28. Postergirl by nukethewhalesagain · · Score: 1

    I think us geeks need to change our postergirl. This illusion that we have fallen into that Natalie Portman is one of us is ridiculous. I think we need to find someone else. Maybe an asian? ;)

    1. Re:Postergirl by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      I nominate Grace Park, aka "Boomer" on the new BSG. Regardless of what you may think of the show, Grace is HOT! And unlike Natalie, she actually has the curves of a woman.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    2. Re:Postergirl by schon · · Score: 1

      Naw.. what about Lexa Doig?

      She at least plays D&D and RPG videogames.

  29. You guys are behind the times by mtrisk · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's all about Dakota Fanning now.

    Sadly, I think she's the same age Natalie Portman was when she first attracted a following...

    --

    Without a proper flamewar, Anonymous was undecided on what shell to run.
    1. Re:You guys are behind the times by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Dakota Fanning is 11 years old, for chrissakes. Anyone thinking of "hitting that" should be put up against a wall and shot.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    2. Re:You guys are behind the times by Tilmitt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No they shouldn't. People like you who desend into moral hysteria about peoples thoughts should be shot. There are far more "sick" things than thinking about underage sex, though you seem to think that a thought crime is worse than all these by advocating a penalty that is not applied to even the worse crimes, except in some parts of the USA. Strange the way the "moral" people are far more likely to advocate death.

      --
      This guy are sick.
    3. Re:You guys are behind the times by maxpublic · · Score: 0

      People like you who desend into moral hysteria about peoples thoughts should be shot.

      That would be "descend".

      And any way you slice it, people who fantasize about banging prepubescents are seriously fucked up. That isn't normal, natural, or even rational.

      There are far more "sick" things than thinking about underage sex

      Sure. Actually *having* sex with prepubescents. Here, I'll edit my original statement like so:

      "we should THINK about putting people who fantasize about having sex with children up against a wall and shooting them"

      and

      "anyone who has sex with a prepubescent should be put up against a wall and shot"

      That make you feel better?

      though you seem to think that a thought crime is worse than all these

      No, I think fantasizing about having sex with children makes you a sick motherfucker, and not someone I want to associate with in any way, shape or form.

      Strange the way the "moral" people are far more likely to advocate death.

      Never claimed to be "moral", though you seem fine with the misquote. Guess my "hysteria" was infectious.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    4. Re:You guys are behind the times by Tilmitt · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That would be "descend".

      I point you to one of my previous posts....

      And any way you slice it, people who fantasize about banging prepubescents are seriously fucked up. That isn't normal, natural, or even rational.

      People said the same about homosexuality in the past, and did terrible things to them. Turing for example. Normal and natural are extremely subjective. There was a time when it was normal to burn "witches" and enemies of the church. Again Homosexuals were considered unnatural despite a significant amount of people being so inclined. As for rational...well love isn't rational, nor should we expect it to be.

      Sure. Actually *having* sex with prepubescents. Here, I'll edit my original statement like so:

      "we should THINK about putting people who fantasize about having sex with children up against a wall and shooting them"

      and

      "anyone who has sex with a prepubescent should be put up against a wall and shot"

      That make you feel better?


      Well i don't think we should think about killing anyone for their thoughts, but i respect the right to think about anything, even killing people for thinking. I don't think people should be shot for having consensual sex with a prepubescent. If it's rape then they should recieve a trial by due process. Hopefully the court would not be so barbaric as to give the death sentance as punishment for this crime, an appropriate long jail term with rehabilitation would be a much better solution. As for the penalty for consensual sex, well i believe there should be none. No doubt you will take strong issue with this and i can see why, but i do not believe that such people are doing anything wrong and it is none of my or anyone elses right to condemn them for their own private consented behavior, which does not hurt wider society in any way.

      No, I think fantasizing about having sex with children makes you a sick motherfucker, and not someone I want to associate with in any way, shape or form.

      I can't argue with that, I wouldn't like to associate with people that i consider to take actions abhorrent to me either.

      Never claimed to be "moral", though you seem fine with the misquote. Guess my "hysteria" was infectious.

      I looked at some of your previous posts and i thought they were very conservative and thus presumed you to be one of those people who consider yourself a bastion of morality. This was a wrong assumtion on my part, assumptions often make a fool out of a poster, and i take your point here.

      --
      This guy are sick.
    5. Re:You guys are behind the times by maxpublic · · Score: 0

      If it's rape then they should recieve a trial by due process.

      You're talking about screwing someone who hasn't even hit puberty yet - you do know that, don't you? How can someone who's say, 8 or 9 years old, consent to having sex?

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    6. Re:You guys are behind the times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > Never claimed to be "moral", though you seem fine with the misquote. Guess my "hysteria" was infectious.

      And this comes from a guy whose "handle"(!) practically is maxpubic.

      Well I guess that would make anyone naked and petrified.

    7. Re:You guys are behind the times by Tilmitt · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You're talking about screwing someone who hasn't even hit puberty yet - you do know that, don't you? How can someone who's say, 8 or 9 years old, consent to having sex?

      Well i was thinking more around the ages of 11 or 12, i can't see many people wanting to have sex with girls younger than that. It is hard to put an arbitary cut off point. A underdeveloped 16 year old male could look the same and be at the same physiological development as a overdeveloped 12 year old girl. But i suppose there are a small few that would like girls even younger and indeed even a 10 year old cannot fully comprehend what it means to consent. Right i shall revise my position. 10 and under should be a crime. But i think that by 11, or if not definately 12, a person has enough mental development to understand consent. Therefore i think sex between people this age, or sex between people this age and people older, should not be a crime.

      --
      This guy are sick.
    8. Re:You guys are behind the times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uou're one fucked up bastard to try to justify this shit. I hope you die.

    9. Re:You guys are behind the times by schon · · Score: 0

      I lost my virginity when I was 8; it was with my next-door neighbor, who was the same age.

      So.. you're saying that we should both be executed?

      You're not from Iran by any chance are you?

    10. Re:You guys are behind the times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Its in the archives now, but the NY Times ran an article with some research in it recently indicating that we (as a race) are nearly uniformly attracted to the young of our species, with the definition of being "young" including pubescence and pre-pubescence.

      http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F70 A1FF6395C0C708EDDA80894DD404482&incamp=archive:sea rch

      Your contention that it is not normal, then, is most likely false.

      The key point though is that it is potentially very harmful to the receiver of the attention, and the demonization of it also means that the only "practitioners" are serious wackos, making the majority of current examples candidates easy to view in a negative light.

      That's a cultural thing though, and in the past, as well as in other cultures, its not like that.

      Points up the silliness of trying to make it a thought-crime though. You'd be guilty too, as soon as the PATRIOT III (its for the kids!) gave them the power to EEG you while looking at pictures of 13-14 year old girls in bathing suits. Oh look! There's arousal! You should be shot!

    11. Re:You guys are behind the times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's mutual.

    12. Re:You guys are behind the times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I think fantasizing about having sex with children makes you a sick motherfucker, and not someone I want to associate with in any way, shape or form.

      If you really believe that pedophiles are "sick", then punishing them for being sick seems morally questionable. By definition, if their desires are symptoms of their illness, then the desires are not of their own choosing and not their fault. What other illnesses do you think people should be punished for?

      Crimes are for sane people; if it's not something that any sane person would ever want to do, then it's not a crime.

    13. Re:You guys are behind the times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fanning, pfft. Emma Watson is far hotter.

    14. Re:You guys are behind the times by coopex · · Score: 1

      You might wanna have a better grasp on the english language, and basic biology if you're gonna flip out about your moral hangups.

      puberty The stage of adolescence in which an individual becomes physiologically capable of sexual reproduction.

      The physical changes of puberty occur somewhere between the ages of 9 and 16. The first sign in females is breast development, which usually occurs between ages 8-14, with an average age of 11-12. Pubic hair appears, on average, at age 12-13. Menstruation usually occurs one to two years after pubic hair growth.

      So quite possibly, Dakota Fanning's field has grass, so Nature's saying play ball and go pump out babies.

      As for the sexual lives of prepubescents, while not capable of actual sex, children have a curiousity about their and others bodies that would be considered foreplay in adults, witness "playing doctor" - regardless of what you want to delude yourself with, humans are sexual creatures, and according to The Onion, the age of consent in South Carolina is 15, so that technially could be prepubescent sex.

      --
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
    15. Re:You guys are behind the times by coopex · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, he's just jealous that he's 35 and hasn't even worked up the nerve to hold a full conversation with a girl.

      --
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
  30. I sense a disturbance in the Force... by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...it's as if a million kittens cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:I sense a disturbance in the Force... by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      That may just be too clever for you to get moderated up :-)

    2. Re:I sense a disturbance in the Force... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      every time you masturbate god kills a kitten. fuck god

    3. Re:I sense a disturbance in the Force... by jcuervo · · Score: 1

      It took me a second, but I got it. Damned near fell out of my chair from laughing so hard...

      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  31. Worthless. by Vorondil28 · · Score: 1

    wtf, no pics?

    I don't know about you guys, but I'll save my grits for another day. ;)

    --
    This sig rocks the casbah.
  32. You know by techsoldaten · · Score: 1, Funny

    You know, a karma whore like me should probably not be participating in any discussion involving Natalie Portman. At the same time, it will probably be about 5 years before I get another chance. So ere goes.

    Far, far in teh future, in a petrified forest just outside the ruins of Philadelphia, stands a naked, marbelized corpse with an expression of fear and angst across it's face. Scientists of the day, doing research into the decline and fall of mankind hundreds and thousands of years earlier, use temporal analysis instruments to peer into the past and determine the what brought this poor, pathetic creature into these woods and how it came to be in such a state.

    Upon a floating disk stands a large, translucent box, the outer covering of which disguises a number of gears and tubes which come to life as the scientists activate it's instruments. Within the large, green viewport, the scientists peer backwards into time, watching countless days and nights peel away like skins of an onion. As time comes back, so do glaciers of mineral deposits which once covered the entire area. For hours, the scientists stare into the viewport. 'This isn't going fast enough', mutters the chief scientist, twisting a knob to increase the rate of reversion.

    Suddenly, there is a blazing flash of light, the deposits receed, and the scientists watch the last days of man with great interest. From their viewport, they stare over the city of Philadelphia and watch as the air defences fire upon opponents in the skies above. Massive sledges of steaming, boiling grits drop their payloads onto the city, and block by block the guns go silent. The scene on the horizon is choked by the sheer number of sledges, and the cackling of the sledgemasters can be heard through the audible amplification unit. The thousands of lenses of the scientists eyes focus all at once on the city limits, where fleeing citizens can be seen escaping a bubbling, oozing force as it emerges from all the buildings. Soon, the valley surrounding the city is becoming layered with grits running over from the city, and the skyline which was home to people for so many generations vanishes in a grey, chunky mess.

    The scientists watch as survivors coming up the hill become trapped in the lava-like ooze and instantly burst into flames. By now, they can hear the screams of the last few runners who somehow managed to stay ahead of the grits which have filled the valley like chowder in a soup bowl. Finally, lights shine through the clouds above a massive sledge emerges from the heavens, larger than the city itself lying below. A thunderous beeping sound, like that of a thousand backloaders, begins echoing over the scene. In the viewport, the scientists watch with keen interest as 2 events take place: the last of the runners makes her way into the forest, towards higher grounds above and possibly salvation, and the bottom of the massive sledge gives way to megatons of steaming hot grits. In an instant, the runner is swept up in the massive outpouring of grits which quickly consume her. The viewport goes dark.

    'Back up a few frames, I want to check something', says the lead scientist. The culinary officer complies, his cerci swinging back and forth excitedly as the group looks for clues to the identity of the runner. They stare closely into the viewport, when one of the scientists exlaims 'Stop! That badge seems to be a means of identification. T'jalfar, you know ancient human dialects, what does it say?'

    T'jalfar adjusts his 4,000 lensed monacle. After a moment, he mutters, 'Port... Port... Portman! That is what it says, this one's name was Portman.'

    'What does it mean?' asks one of the other scientists.

    'Definitely kosher, my friends. By the name given on the badge, it is safe to say this one was definitely kosher' says T'jalfar.

    An excited chatter rose amongst the crowd. The culinary officer ambled up to the marblized corpse, it's anntenae running all over to determine the best place to insert his instruments. Being the most advanced species on the planet, the cockroach scientists take great care to only seek out the finest meals and employ the most advanced technology to ensure the quality of their food.

    M

  33. Obviously... by Junta · · Score: 2, Informative

    She must just be trying get rid of some of that pesky hot grits slashdotters keep pouring down her pants..

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  34. Re:Since the interview is totally without substanc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for the text porn.

    I came right here

    > Then I explode into my second orgasm that
    > night, and tons of white-hot sticky sperm
    > came out of my cock

  35. Yes, writers of The Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    More like the plagarisers of the matrix. I should clarify that. I believe they did write the Matrix 2 and 3. But I believe Sophia Stewart's claim that they stole her idea (especially for the first movie). The second and third movies are so pathetic, that it's obvious to anyone who has seen the movies that they weren't written by the same people.

    Just because there is a lawsuit aleging that the idea was stolen doesn't mean that it actually is. First of all, Sophia Stewart's claim is not only that the plot of The Matrix was stolen from her (unreleased) book "The Third Eye", but also that the plot of The Terminator was aswell. What do these two movies have in common:

    1) Machines take over
    2) ... erm... cool special effects?

    How is it possible that two movies with completely different storylines were stolen from one book? It's quite obvious that she has simply noticed a few similarities between her book and these two movies, and decided to profit from it, as well as get publicity for her book which she has now decided to publish.

    1. Re:Yes, writers of The Matrix by ndogg · · Score: 1
      What do these two movies have in common

      The Terminator and the Matrix aren't all that different if you think about it, and it's not to hard to fathom that the Terminator could be considered a prequel to the Matrix.

      In the Matrix, the world is controlled by the machines after the humans lost the war to them. In the Terminator, the machines are in war with humans to gain control of the world.
      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    2. Re:Yes, writers of The Matrix by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Well, "Machines take over" had been done before she wrote the book, but "cool special effects" in the book certainly convinced me ;-)

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    3. Re:Yes, writers of The Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The Terminator and the Matrix aren't all that different if you think about it, and it's not to hard to fathom that the Terminator could be considered a prequel to the Matrix.

      Except for the fact that they have two completely different backstories.

      The premise of the Terminator was that the military created a supercomputer which became self-aware, decided humans were a threat and started wiping them out. In the Matrix, humans created AI/robots and became overly dependent on them, which led to a backlash against them, which led to a war which the machines won.

      There really isn't any similarity beyond the theme of machines overthrowing their masters.

  36. Free 3D cad software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.x-cad.net/

    I want one :P

  37. the biggest waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i read slashdot daily, but i never reply(i dont even have an account). but this story is a complete waste. seems more like a reason to make people go click on ign to boost ads or something. so i felt the need to reply just to say how stupid this story is.

  38. Re:slashdot sucks and i don't like it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can open, grits everywhere...

    Did they really think that an actual insightful or informative post could ever come from this article?

  39. evidence that the same person(s) wrote all three by MegaFur · · Score: 3, Insightful

    (I admit the "evidence" that I present in a moment is rather weak, but then I also think the claims made by this Sophia person are extremely, deeply stupid. IMHO, the idea that she originally created scripts with material used for both the Matrix and Terminator is a typically pathetic urban legend. Just like aligators live in the sewers or that NASA didn't send missions to the moon.)

    Evidence (weakly--really more like hearsay, but at least it's someone I consider reliable): In the first half of this vmyths article, Rob Rosenberger claims to have been asked to serve as technical advisor for the Matrix.

    The studio sent him materials describing the plot of the movie. When he went to the theater and saw the Matrix, it didn't end like he thought it would. Later, after finding out what was in store for Matrix: Reloaded, he realized the reason the first movie hadn't ended like he'd expected was because the studio materials the studio had sent him had been used in the making of all three movies.

    ------------

    I really don't think Matrix 2 and 3 are so different from the first one. What makes them seem so different is that the first film had a miraculous revelation--that the world we thought was real isn't. The 1st film spent time exploring this notion and let us in on the whole thing slowly. Unfortunately, once the concept of The Matrix had been established, the not-so-bright Wachowski brothers had no new revelations to top it. This happens frequently. I see many, many, many movies, indeed stories in general, that start out with a lot of promise, but are ultimately not able to follow through when it comes around to the middle and especially the end. This is because it's the mystery that survives, not the explanation. To put that another way: it's much easier to ask a thought provoking and inspiring "what if?" question than it is to come up with an equally profound, deeply meaningful answer. 42.

    After the first movie had been seen, but before the 2nd or 3rd movies came out, people had a lot of time (waaay too much time) to build up naive ideas about what direction the trilogy would eventually take. Fan expectations rose ever higher, and it's no surprise that the eventual conclusion could not live up to those (unrealistic) expectations.

    Please go back and watch The Matrx (#1) again sometime--try to throw away all those ideas about what you thought it was supposed to mean and just watch the thing--I think you'll find it's not quite so brilliant as you may have led yourself to believe.

    (P.S. Hope I didn't flame--if so, I didn't mean to, I'm just opinionated.)
    --
    Furry cows moo and decompress.
  40. SWIMING IN HOT GRITS!!! by ndogg · · Score: 1

    N/T

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    1. Re:SWIMING IN HOT GRITS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If she's petrified, how the hell is she supposed to swim?

  41. Wouldnt that be by deke_kun · · Score: 1

    Andy and _Linda_ Wachowski?

    1. Re:Wouldnt that be by glitch0 · · Score: 1

      hahahahaha made my night

      --
      -Glitch "We all know Linux is great...it does infinite loops in 5 seconds." - Linus Torvalds
  42. FUCK YEAH THAT WAS FUCKING HOTT!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your ideas intrigue me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

  43. Re:evidence that the same person(s) wrote all thre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree w/ you. I think the same thing happened w/ "Cube".

  44. Re:evidence that the same person(s) wrote all thre by rhizome · · Score: 1

    This happens frequently. I see many, many, many movies, indeed stories in general, that start out with a lot of promise, but are ultimately not able to follow through when it comes around to the middle and especially the end. This is because it's the mystery that survives, not the explanation.

    I think the reason Matrix 2 and 3 are worse than the first one is that the first one was written as a movie, then they saw how successful it was and grafted some crappy sequels onto it. I really don't care what anybody says, so my opinion is really for naught, but it seems obvious to me that the Matrix was shopped to the studios as a single movie, with the ending changed so that it allowed for the studio-ordered sequels.

    --
    When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
  45. Graphic Novel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that one of those kiddie picture books? Just call it a comic book for christ sake!

  46. Umm.... by kf6auf · · Score: 1

    If you don't care, don't read and don't post. Very easy, very simple.

    And how do you propose that I find out if I care before I read and conclude that I don't care?
    There are a large number of articles on topics that I don't really care about (not just this one), but I would say that it's reasonable to complain (by posting) when something maybe seems interesting enough to RTFA and then is total crap or it if seems like total crap and lives up to expectations.

    To (at least pretend to) be a bit more constructive than the grandparent, if we had a system by which articles could be moderated, we might not get posts like this since people could mod stories "-1, WHO THE FUCK CARES?"

  47. The origin of NP N&P by Chris+Brewer · · Score: 1

    Is here, posted in /.'s 10,000th story.

    --
    Consultancy: If you're not part of the solution, there's money to be made in prolonging the problem
  48. Asia Carrera by LKM · · Score: 1

    Okay, not bad. How about Asia Carrera? :-)

    A member of the high-IQ organization MENSA, Asia ranks with the most intelligent and accomplished ladies to have ever appeared in porn. By age 14 she had already established herself as a classical concert pianist, having performed twice live at Carnegie Hall, and two years later found herself teaching colloquial English at Tsuruga College in Japan. Unable to deal with the continuing pressure to excel from her parents, Asia ran away from home at 17, but was found and placed in foster care. (...) Two of her hobbies are studying quantum physics and the stock market.
  49. did Roger Ebert start editing for slashdot? by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

    Unless you are posting an article with pics of Natalie Portman nekkid, why the fuck would I come to slashdot to read this?

    Christ, go dig through the bag of rejected submissions for somehting more interesting if you guys are that bored.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  50. Just what London needs ... by SeanJones · · Score: 1

    a film about someone bombing central London. Expect outrage and then a dupe of this article to appear under "your rights online" when people call for the film, the comics, comic-book readers, the nerdularly challenged generally, etc to be banned.

  51. Stewart's Claims Make Sense by LKM · · Score: 2, Informative
    With the date difference between the matrix and the terminator, I'd say she just wrote a script about governing computer mainframes and machines in the 70's, submitted it to a bunch of people, noticed some story similarities, and obsessively thought they stole her work...lawyers...profit!!!

    It's not quite that simple. If you read about what she's actually claiming, it kind of makes sense. Now please note that I'm not claiming she's right. I don't know if she is. Just that what she's claiming makes sense. So here's the deal:

    Her book, "Third Eye", spans both Terminater and Matrix. It works like this: Terminator is kind of the first part of the book. Machines start to take over. John Connor is born, he's "The One". Matrix is the second part: Machines have taken over, and Connor/Neo destroys the machines. So, according to her, Terminator actually tells the story that happened before Matrix. Terminator tells how the machines took over, the actual war between machines and humans. Matrix tells the second part, how the humans started to fight back and eventually reached an agreement with the machines.

    She isn't claiming that they're stolen from the same plot, but from different parts of the same plot, and it actually fits pretty well.

  52. Re:evidence that the same person(s) wrote all thre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Cube sequel wasn't done by the same people who did the original as far as I know.

    Cube was a great film for what it was, but I don't think it was one that would lend itself to repeated viewings, nor to a sequel.

  53. This is a good example of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    one confused young man asked if starring in movies like Mighty Ducks was different than starring in films like V for Vendetta. Problem is, Ms. Portman never starred in Mighty Ducks.

    Thinking with your duck.

    1. Re:This is a good example of... by MynockGuano · · Score: 1

      When I read that line, I thought about it for a bit and I think the person must have had her confused with the actress that played the backup goalkeeper in D2. They do look remarkably similar, from my recollection of the movie (been ages since I've seen it).

    2. Re:This is a good example of... by MynockGuano · · Score: 1

      Did some IMDB/Google image searchin'...Image of said actress (Colombe Jacobsen). They do look enough alike that one could forgive the mix-up, I think.

  54. Little-known secret about "Sith" movie by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    Actually, "Revenge of the Sith" was originally written with Padme taking part in the final battle on Mustafar, a planet covered in flowing red-hot grits. Things ende up re-written later, however.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  55. stupid story by akhomerun · · Score: 0

    unless portman is starring in "adventures of bob the linux guy" or "fragmented phil", i don't see why her name would even be mentioned on slashdot, never mind getting her own article.

  56. I would have asked... by afabbro · · Score: 1
    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
    1. Re:I would have asked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it's plastic surgery, couldn't be anything to do with getting older and losing her "baby/puppy" fat? (And general weight loss)

  57. Wow, I sure admire her now by afabbro · · Score: 1
    IGNFF: Do you feel like you would ever give your life for a stranger or an ideal?
    PORTMAN: No.

    What a piece of trash. If her nation was being invaded by Nazis, she wouldn't give her life to protect it? If she saw a child inside a burning building, she wouldn't go in?

    Either she's incredibly stupid because she didn't think before she spoke, or she's incredibly self-centered. Or more likely, both.

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
    1. Re:Wow, I sure admire her now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or she's just honest. There's a reason why most people aren't firefighters or police...

    2. Re:Wow, I sure admire her now by hilaryduff · · Score: 1

      maybe she's just being honest. there's a difference between RISKING your life and just giving it away on lost cause.

    3. Re:Wow, I sure admire her now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > What a piece of trash.

      Trash?? Dude, seriously, get a life. Way too much anger for a one word answer to a stupid question.

    4. Re:Wow, I sure admire her now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cause is only lost when people refuse to give their lives for it.
      Anyway, it was asked as: "Would you ever give your life for a stranger or ideal?"

      My answer would be yes. I have ideals that I hold dear, like freedom of speech and expression, that I would have no problems dying for at all. Similarly, if a stranger was in trouble I would not hesitate to risk, or give, my life for theirs.

      It's a matter of courage, honour and principle - not things you hear much about these days, but some of us still hold them dear.

      -JH

    5. Re:Wow, I sure admire her now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lots of tough talk on Slashdot today. If your keyboard were to catch on fire and threaten to burn down an orphanage or something, I guess we all know what you'd do.

    6. Re:Wow, I sure admire her now by jcuervo · · Score: 1
      If your keyboard were to catch on fire and threaten to burn down an orphanage or something, I guess we all know what you'd do.
      Get a new keyboard?
      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
    7. Re:Wow, I sure admire her now by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      See now, this is why I like her.

      She doesn't bullshit.

      Angelina Jolie is like that, too. Straight out, no bullshit.

      Anybody smart enough to realize their life is more important than anyone else's is obviously so far superior to the average moron that it's just icing on the cake that she's cute.

      As for being self-centered (which personally I would prefer, but nobody's perfect), check this quote from an interview out:

      'She described her recent involvement with FINCA, an organization that, in Natalie's words, "provides small loans to women in Third World countries so they can start their own businesses." FINCA's board of directors includes Queen Rania Al-Abdullah, the First Lady of Jordan. "I feel a connection," Natalie said, "because I absolutely admire her humanitarian work."

      Natalie does more than simply lend her name and face to the cause. She has traveled to Guatemala and Uganda to meet with FINCA clients.

      "In Judaism, it's all about the action, not the intention," she said. "It doesn't matter if you mean to do the right thing if you do all bad things. You need to learn how to do right things. Doing is what affects people. Meeting face-to-face, you see that these are people with absolutely nothing who, when given a kernel of hope, run with it and turn their lives around."'

      So your remark demonstrates that you're both ignorant and mean-spirited. Particularly the Nazi remark, given the following facts:

      'At 16, she made her Broadway debut, starring in The Diary of Anne Frank, the story of the 13-year-old Jewish girl who hid from the Nazis in Amsterdam before being sent to her death at the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp. It was an acting experience that, she said, changed her.

      "Anne Frank's faith in humanity, even when she was starving and sick, had a huge influence on me," Natalie recalled. "It convinced me that people need to be constantly reminded of compassion." The role also connected with her personal family history. Her grandfather moved to Palestine from Poland in the 1930s, expecting his family to join him. His parents, however, were sent to Auschwitz while his 14-year-old brother hid with a Catholic family.

      "Finally [the brother] just couldn't handle it anymore. He ran outside and was shot," she said. "Being in the play reminded me that history isn't just the past. It's alive in us." This concept is underscored by the fact that while Natalie felt the need to use a stage name to protect her privacy as a minor, she chose to borrow her late grandmother's surname. (The star's real name is Natalie Hershlag.)'

      This makes your remark one of the dumber /. comments I've read recently - and that's hard to do, so you should be proud.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    8. Re:Wow, I sure admire her now by afabbro · · Score: 1

      Dude, she isn't going to date you. There's a reason transhumanists never get laid.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    9. Re:Wow, I sure admire her now by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      There's a reason /. nerdboys don't get laid either.

      Being smart-ass assholes is only ONE reason.

      Besides, who says Transhumanists don't get laid?

      Have you ever seen Max More's wife, Natasha?

      Or Gina Miller, who does "The NanoGirl News" Usenet newsletter?

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    10. Re:Wow, I sure admire her now by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      My answer would be yes. I have ideals that I hold dear, like freedom of speech and expression, that I would have no problems dying for at all.

      Should I take this to mean that you would kill yourself in protest before allowing yourself to be silenced through censorship? After all, that is giving your life for the ideal. It would be a pretty stupid way to go, though. Some general (MacArthur?) said the point of war was not to die for your country, but to make some other poor bastard die for his. I find dying for a cause to generally be the worst possible way to support it, unless you are godlike (Ghandi, Jesus, and other martyrs).

  58. 2001 A SLASHDOT ODYSSEY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the dawn of osm

    it was a scarce time on the internet. osm surfed from one link to the next in search of something, anything, of interest. the porn was cheap and raunchy. there was no gnutella yet, so mp3s were difficult to obtain. there was no quake iii for linux, so games were boring. day after day, week after week, osm searched the internet in vain.

    too lazy to move, he toileted in the cat-box. he picked fleas off of the cats for sustenance. he showered by sticking his head out the window when it rained and he drank from the rainwater he collected in a rusted pale. yes, it was a wretched, barren existence.

    it was a typical evening. osm had just showered, thanks to a particularly severe thunderstorm. he even had the luxury of a nice wind afterward, which he used to blow dry his hair. having found nothing on the internet, osm decided to go to sleep early. he shut off the monitor and fell asleep.

    usually, osm slept until two or three in the afternoon. but something woke him early on this particular morning. in his sleep, osm felt something compelling him to life. slowly, he left his dreams and floated into the real world. he felt a presence behind him. he swung his chair around.

    osm was shocked by the astonishing object. a giant, black statue of natalie portman stood behind him. it was as though it was watching over him. osm sank out of his chair, terrified, and crawled over to the statue. he touched its unnaturally smooth surface, pulling his hand back quickly. he did this several times, before he had the courage to run his hand along the smooth teen leg. he put his face to the statue and licked it with his tongue. he smelled the object and put his ear to it, listening for anything familiar.

    several days passed and osm had grown comfortable with the graceful figure of natalie portman watching over him. one night, he loaded up netscape and began browsing the internet. suddenly, a thought entered his mind. he looked at the statue, knowing that it had planted the thought. osm pointed his cursor at the "location" box in netscape. he typed in the string: "http://slashdot.org" and hit enter. osm's life changed forever.

    three days later, the natalie portman statue was gone.

    the geek compound

    rob malda sat in his office, strumming his guitar in an attempt to relax. the pressures of the constant battle with the trolls, the hardware failures, the slash bugs and the threats from microsoft had weighed heavily upon his shoulders for several months now.

    rob's phone started beeping loudly. startled, he dropped his guitar. he looked at the phone, debating himself as to whether he should answer. he hesitated before picking up the receiver, "yeah."

    "rob, this is jeff. meet me in the hallway, immediately, you're not going to believe this!"

    rob hung up the phone and rubbed his temple before pulling himself out of the chair, "What now?!"

    rob left his office and walked down the hall. jeff appeared from the corner, "rob, we were cleaning out some old junk from the storage closet... you're not going to believe what we found buried in there!"

    rob picked up his pace as jeff led him to the closet. jeff opened the door. rob's jaw dropped. the tall, black statue of natalie portman peered out over them. rob reached out to touch the statue, "what the hell?"

    suddenly, the statue began emitting a piercing shriek. rob slammed the door shut, barely muffling the sound, "where the hell did that come from?"

    jeff shook his head, "there's only one person who can solve this mystery..."

    rob shuddered, "goddamnit. i hate that guy!"

    the portman mission

    hemos and rob determined that the transmission from the statue was aimed at albany, new york. they bought a winnebago and modified it with the latest in technology. the new vehicle was renamed the geekebago and osm was hired to travel in it to albany, new york. robin

    1. Re:2001 A SLASHDOT ODYSSEY by Wheely · · Score: 1

      I sort of miss osm

  59. News for Slashdot nerds ! by Exaton · · Score: 1

    You are very obviously new here. It's not just any Hollywood celebrity man, it's Natalie Portman !

    Read up on /. subculture : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slashdot_subculture

    Then see posts related to the Natalie Portman naked & petrified phenomenon on /. : http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=6106&cid=99173 6
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4977&cid=11316 67

    Oh, and when you think a newsitem is not newsworthy, just move along. I find your comment a lot less interesting than the story itself, and by your own standards that's saying something.

  60. I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...welcome our naked and petrified overlords.

  61. Re:slashdot sucks and i don't like it by waltznumber3 · · Score: 0

    Yes, but Ms. Portman, DOES it or DOES it NOT run linux?!?!??!!11!one!

    --
    If you just took anything I said seriously, read it again.
  62. Hollywood doesn't get it by HooliganIntellectual · · Score: 1

    Rumor has it that the anarchism is being taken out of V is for Vendetta. That's too bad. When will Hollywood understand that good movies are based on the good shit that authors dream up, not what placates some test audience?

  63. To all who object by kbahey · · Score: 1

    To all who object to this article, as an old timer, I say to you "You must be new here"!

    Anyone who has been here for a while knows that many Slashdotters have a fetish about Natalie Portman, Hot grits, naked and petrified.

  64. Re:evidence that the same person(s) wrote all thre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I admit the "evidence" that I present in a moment is rather weak
    Just so you know: I didn't read past that sentence. You might consider that the next time you decide to present an argument.
  65. My girlfriend gets the occasional "People" by Eunuch · · Score: 1

    But also read Harry Potter too! There's more to life than video cards. Look for someone who you can love.

    --
    Transcend Humanity. Please.
  66. Other way around. by jasonhamilton · · Score: 1

    It's more like the matrix happened, neo is the saviour, and the robots go back in time to stop him.

    So the matrix is the prequel.

    --
    SearchIRC - Now with live chat directory!
  67. where's your sense of history by Stu+Charlton · · Score: 1

    Natalie Portman has been a fixture topic on this site since 1999, when she first starred in Star Wars.

    I think bitching about topics like this and the Bruce Campbell interview show a profound disrespect for the quirky nature of the topics here and the history behind why some topics come up repeatedly.

    I come to Slashdot because I tend to enjoy these topics along side my dose of OSS , Linux, or whatever tech news. I would be upset if the editors listened to your voices and stopped posting articles like this , or the Bruce Campbell, interview.

    --
    -Stu
  68. MANY OF US CARE by Stu+Charlton · · Score: 1

    Read up on your history, asshole.

    This has been stuff that matters since around 1999. And by "stuff that matters", it generally is up to the editors, not the "majority".

    --
    -Stu
  69. natalie portman is cool by Madcapjack · · Score: 1
    Natalie Portman is cool because she likes graphic novels.

  70. Natalie Hershlag? who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why should any selfrespecting nerd care what Natalie Hershlag d.b.a. Portman has to say about anything? Can she write a line of Linux? Does she campaign for open source and the GPL?

  71. Sort of trolling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    vendetta, hot chicks....try this out.

    www.bellavendetta.com

  72. Natlie jewbag name is: Natalie Hershlag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    also where the pix of her scratching her jew ass?

  73. All that is done has been done before by DragonHawk · · Score: 1

    Yah know, claims like this surface all the time. And some of them are even true. But the one thing that seems to get missed in all the discussion is that stories get retold. There are a handful of fundamental conflicts that get used to build all stories. There are a slightly larger number of basic plots that appear to surface in just about every story ever told. Plot devices in SF get re-used and re-invented constantly. Gee, evil robots, never heard that one before. Hell, "man's creation turns against him" is arguably the first science fiction story ever -- remember Frankenstein? I don't see Mary Shelley suing Harlan Ellison or Sophia Stewart though. (Yes, I know she's long dead, I'm making a freaking point.)

    These days, it's damn hard to have an idea that someone else hasn't had before.

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
  74. Re:evidence that the same person(s) wrote all thre by Sketch · · Score: 1
    I admit the "evidence" that I present in a moment is rather weak, but then I also think the claims made by this Sophia person are extremely, deeply stupid. IMHO, the idea that she originally created scripts with material used for both the Matrix and Terminator is a typically pathetic urban legend.

    Her claim is that she sent the Wachowski's her manuscript years before they wrote the Matrix. If that's true, she may actually have a case against them. I don't see how the Terminator movies could really be the result of it, unless they had anything to do with the creation of Terminator, which is probably pretty unlikely.
    I really don't think Matrix 2 and 3 are so different from the first one. What makes them seem so different is that the first film had a miraculous revelation--that the world we thought was real isn't.

    There was that, but that happened less than halfway through the film. It may have added to the novelty for the rest of the film, but I don't think that was the reason. There were a few "revelations" in the second and third ones as well, though admittedly they weren't quite as interesting.

    I think it's more that the first was very quickly paced, kept you on your toes, and well produced with great use of music and imagery. The sequels seemed to lose this pacing, and I don't recall the music being anything special either. Really, nothing all that major happened in the second movie...it felt pretty "slow", and there really wasn't much of a resolution. They really should have released 2 and 3 back to back, not having to wait 6 months to find out what happened might have helped somewhat.

    Another thing I think may play a factor is Keanu as The One in the virtual matrix is a lot more believable than Keanu as The One in "the real wold". Especially with all of the special powers he seems to gain towards the end. Special powers in virtual reality: believable. Seeing things in fire after being blinded: not so believable.
    --
    -- OpenVerse Visual Chat: http://openverse.com
  75. And LOTR... by KnarfO · · Score: 1

    "Stupid nerdseses! It ruinses the grits! It ruinses it! It pours it downs its pantseses, not it stupid mouths!"

    --


    "Creativity is allowing ones self to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep" - Scott Adams
  76. Re:It makes NO sense, and I"m sick of this by rbarreira · · Score: 1

    There could be no better person to talk about the Sophia Stewart vs Wachowski brothers case, than our friend bonch, since he seems to know very well what he's talking about when he mentions copyright infringement.

    --

    The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
  77. Re:evidence that the same person(s) wrote all thre by MegaFur · · Score: 1

    So instead, you'd rather waste time reading and replaying to the many weak arguments made by people that *aren't* willing to lay their cards on the table right from the beginning? Ok. To each zir own.

    --
    Furry cows moo and decompress.