Slashdot Mirror


Governmental Servers Wiped? Never!

Geoff writes with a story from Australia: "Eighteen AIX servers purchased from government via auction -- none of them had data removed from them. Ticket Vending and Validation source code, Payroll, Finance, Emails and Customer complaints. All there on every server; they were even nice enough to include some old backup tapes. At ~$14USD per server, it's amazing how cheap personal information has become."

284 comments

  1. Understandable . . . by Gabrill · · Score: 5, Funny

    They're just rushing to get rid of the things without properly preparing them. Kinda like this attempt at a firt post!

    --
    Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
    1. Re:Understandable . . . by trollzor · · Score: 2, Funny

      well I am in a rush too, I only have two weeks, so wow, those are some cheap servers, I only have two weeks and a $100 budget to set up my new project. So they will be great for me. And $14USD per server?! Sounds good for my project we only have two weeks and a $100 budget.

    2. Re:Understandable . . . by acceber · · Score: 5, Interesting
      "Keep in mind that these servers came from the State Transit Authority of NSW, how is it possible and acceptable in this day of age that governmental servers be decommissioned and sold without wiping the contents of the drives?"

      The STA is responsible for the operations of the Sydney Buses network which I used to rely on for travel to & from school, work, and for social events -- until I got my car. It is the most unreliable system ever, on par with the NSW Cityrail system both which has been constantly riddled with problems. It's not surprising that a blunder such as this went by unnoticed.

      I would like to do my bit for the environment and use public transport as much as possible but I never get where I need to on time. I've been to Russia and even there, the buses and subway system are more reliable.

    3. Re:Understandable . . . by melikamp · · Score: 1

      The subway was good in Moscow 7 years ago, when I left. But the buses...

    4. Re:Understandable . . . by sgant · · Score: 1

      But doesn't it seem that even if they did try to wipe the contents from the drives, someone would be able to read everything anyway?

      You always hear about no matter how many times or what technique you use to wipe out a hard-drive, there is always a way to read everything that has ever been written to it since the birth of the drive. Which is why they say the only reliable way to destroy the data on the drive is to physically destroy the drive itself.

      So hard drives seem to be media that you can write to and write to and write to and you'll always be able to get the data back. So a 1 gig drive could become an infinite gig drive since you can keep going and going and going and still someone could read the data back to where it was first written to.

      At least it seems this way with the way the media makes out.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    5. Re:Understandable . . . by rob123 · · Score: 0

      Problems? You mean like 'the wrong type of snow'?

      Oh wait, that's the UK...

    6. Re:Understandable . . . by Detritus · · Score: 1

      I know someone who does this stuff as part of his job. All hard drives are removed from the computers being removed from service. They are sent through an industrial strength degausser to nuke any information left on the drives. What's left is scrap metal, since the degausser also wipes the servo signals needed to position the head over the tracks on the disk. This is what they do to ordinary computers. Computers that have been used to store or process classified information get more intense treatment.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    7. Re:Understandable . . . by Zacha · · Score: 1

      The trains have issues. But the buses get me to Uni and back every week just fine. I just wish they had more leg room.

    8. Re:Understandable . . . by Uber+Banker · · Score: 1

      So hard drives seem to be media that you can write to and write to and write to and you'll always be able to get the data back. So a 1 gig drive could become an infinite gig drive...

      Not really. The impressions in the drive which are overwritten still exist as shadows, but reading them to any level of accuracy or reliability is extremely hard. Sure a 1 gig drive can 'store' more in this way, but its hard to read - it involves dismanteling the drive and using specialist equipment and even that's not guaranteed. As data is rewritten more and more the shadow gets noisier and noisier - extracting meaningful data from the drive since inception, if it has been a well worked drive, is unlikely - probably 2 generations is all you you could rely on, if that, sometimes you could strike lucky and get 3 generations...

    9. Re:Understandable . . . by pschmied · · Score: 1
      Could you possibly make a more arrogant comment? God save american egocentrism.

      Well, given the context of his post, I'd say this is more likely to be an instance of Australian egocentrism.

      Even still, I must say that I've been to Moscow twice in the past 4 years and that their (albeit aging) metro system compares favorably to any of the others that I've seen in most other places.

      Here's a stat for you: More people ride the Moscow metro per day than ride the London "tube" and the Tokyo metro systems per day combined.


      -Peter

    10. Re:Understandable . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to ask yourselves 1 question:

      Who's fault is this?

      IMO, The "person driving the car" so to speak.

      E.G.-> Whoever the last sysadmin was on that set of machines would be the person I'd personally point the finger @ & say "Uhm, what was going thru your mind?"

      Now, if he was ordered (by "higher ups") to just rush it out the door without wiping it clean (not that there IS such a thing because from what I understand, there is ways to recover data that has been deleted via std. means anyhow), then he'd be excused imo... you do what you're told to get paid.

      However, were I he?

      I would have yelled bigtime that "we still have information of ours on those diskdrives, we need to @ least attempt to clear them, or just not sell the system with those diskdrives in them (much less the backup tapes) & if not? I want a written contract that says 'we clear sysadmin of all possible liability upon sale of these systems, as is' etc."

      That's pretty bad, I hope nobody is adversely affected by such a blunder/oversight.

      Above all:

      I wonder who gave the "OK" to put those out the door for sale in that manner?

      I doubt it's the admin somehow... unless the admin was SO 'green' he didn't even know to do this, which somehow? I doubt.

      APK

    11. Re:Understandable . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, he's been spending all his time using the Sydney and NSW transportation in Australia, so he must be American. God save mindless, unfounded American-bashing. Besides, while you're bashing Americans, going after this guy forces you to admit he's lived in Australia and been to Russia, shouldn't you be claiming that no American has ever visited another country?

    12. Re:Understandable . . . by gggggggg · · Score: 0

      Right on...
      What can I say,..now they've exported it!
      I can't believe it's not...USA!

    13. Re:Understandable . . . by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Well, assuming that the poster is American - when the party in question is more than likely not - certainly makes you look foolish.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    14. Re:Understandable . . . by HardCase · · Score: 1

      I've been to Russia and even there, the buses and subway system are more reliable.

      When I was in Moscow, the bus system was nothing to be proud of, but the subway - now that was something special. You can thank Uncle Joe and Leonid for the subway system. Of course, you might not want to deal with their management styles personally...

      -h-

    15. Re:Understandable . . . by gggggggg · · Score: 0

      I never assumed that. Notice my "American" was not capitalized on purpose, it was only an adjective.
      It was sarcasm mate...
      Just found it interesting that the all-american egocentrism has now been exported.
      Anyway, I'm dropping it here...!

      Cheers

    16. Re:Understandable . . . by Curien · · Score: 1

      I also do this as part of my job.

      The degaussing thing is common. Usually only degauss drives once they go bad (so we can just throw them away instead of treating them as sensitive). DRMO (the military program to sell/give away to other units old equipment) isn't even supposed to accept anything with hard drives in it. Or at least, the one here doesn't -- maybe they're just extra-paranoid.

      As for the wiping thing, the gov't has strict requirements that, if followed precisely using approved software, are considered good enough to declassify a US SECRET drive. I believe it's six passes, each pass writing a certain bit-pattern across the whole drive. After this is done, the bits have been flipped enough so as to render any data retrieval nearly impossible. IIRC, NATO SECRET drives can be declassified by a similar process with seven passes.

      --
      It's always a long day... 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
    17. Re:Understandable . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Could you possibly make a more arrogant comment? God save american egocentrism.

      He plans to do that, right after he fixes
      European ignorance regarding the location
      of NSW.

    18. Re:Understandable . . . by sconeu · · Score: 3, Informative


      The spec for declassification is DOD-5220.22M

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    19. Re:Understandable . . . by gggggggg · · Score: 0

      It says Australia right in the orignal submitted post.

      Geoff writes with a story from Australia

      Granted I'd have had no idea it was Australia otherwise!

    20. Re:Understandable . . . by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      You always hear about no matter how many times or what technique you use to wipe out a hard-drive, there is always a way to read everything that has ever been written to it since the birth of the drive. Which is why they say the only reliable way to destroy the data on the drive is to physically destroy the drive itself.

      What they NEVER mention is at what cost.
      A junk drive with data intact is somewhere in the $5 range.
      I don't think you will find data recovery for damaged or overwritten drives at anything like $500 or less. I think a few people would be happy to hear of any such at $50,000 or so.
      A single shot of dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda, or ANY such, with put it out of the $5 category to easily read everything.

      Now if the contents are actually sensitive, there is no point to spending lots of money to make a useable $5 drive, so physical desctuction is in order.
      Actually, just opening the case an letting a bit of dust settle on the drives is probably enough to make it unproductive trying to get stuff off of them.

    21. Re:Understandable . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The STA is responsible for the operations of the Sydney Buses network which I used to rely on for travel to & from school, work, and for social events -- until I got my car. It is the most unreliable system ever, on par with the NSW Cityrail system both which has been constantly riddled with problems. It's not surprising that a blunder such as this went by unnoticed.

      I would like to do my bit for the environment and use public transport as much as possible but I never get where I need to on time. I've been to Russia and even there, the buses and subway system are more reliable.


      It depends where you live though. If you are commuting between the Sydney CBD and Bondi for example, whether it be via bus or train, you will have little trouble. In other parts of Sydney though, the bus situation can be terrible. I was fired from my first IT job about 11 years ago, because the one and only bus I could get did not turn up at all. Not only that, but the next bus due AND the one after that also did not turn up. By the time a bus did turn up it was full and just drove past. I did not have a mobile in those days and walking away from the bus stop meant I was risking being even later for work if I missed the next bus. I got to work about an hour and a half late without being able to call to say I was on my way. Understandably, they were pissed off and I was fired.

      Thanks STA. An STA worker attacked me, about 15 years ago also. I was wearing some old style headphones but my Walkman was off, so I could hear clearly. The bus driver was somehow offended by this when I tried to pay my fare and grabbed me, stating that he'd "break my arm for being a smart arse". I was 16. I wish it had happened these days, because I would be on my way to a place of work which would see him lose his job and probably his house once the company I work for finish destroying him AND the STA in court.

      Folks who ride STA. Calculate how much you spend on fares per year, how often you see the fare evasion inspectors and then realise that most of Sydney can benefit from riding with the minimum fare and getting the occasional fine. It tends to be cheaper for most. $33+ per week in fares is too damn much for this shit service. Same deal with the train. If you live a fair distance from the City, buy a Redfern to City weekly and then just cop the fine every now and then. It can be MUCH cheaper.

      When these fuckwits provide a half decent service, I will provide a half decent commuter.

  2. Well by Arghdee · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Who's going to be taken out the back and shot quietly for that one?

    1. Re:Well by Gabrill · · Score: 1

      They've already got the firing papers signed. They're just looking for a name to put at the top.

      --
      Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
    2. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's government. First you have to figure out who was actually responsible for making sure this didn't happen (if anyone). Then you have to try to find their job description and any orders they were given, to see if they can be proven to have broken some rule by not doing so. Then you have to find somebody who is responsible for that person with the power to fire or discipline them. Then you have to convince the supervisor that it is worth their effort to do something about their underling.

      If you can accomplish all that, none of which will be easy, then you have a slim chance of seeing somebody shot quietly.

  3. I don't know what's worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    * That they have sold a bunch of servers laden with personal information for hardly any money at all, or
    * Somebody out there is still running AIX

    1. Re:I don't know what's worse... by bullitB · · Score: 1

      Somebody out there is still running AIX

      Well, clearly they're not running it any more, that's why they sold the servers.

      Actually, perhaps getting the gov't to switch away from AIX is a fair trade for losing a little privacy...

    2. Re:I don't know what's worse... by Nqdiddles · · Score: 1

      What's even worse are the all-too-common stories of filing cabinets and safes being sold at auction - without even being emptied! One story that featured on the news not too long ago had a man who had purchased a safe that contained cheques (checks for you Americans) that hadn't even been cancelled. And Aussies wonder why we have a reputation for a laid back attitude to everything...

      --
      And that kids is how I met your mother.
    3. Re:I don't know what's worse... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I guess this post is "funny" if you consider a bunch of Dells running Fedora a "UNIX environment".

      AIX is still huge once you get out of college.

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    4. Re:I don't know what's worse... by Dogtanian · · Score: 4, Funny

      Somebody out there is still running AIX

      Yeah, I hear that AIX has a large lesbian following...

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    5. Re:I don't know what's worse... by finkployd · · Score: 1

      * Somebody out there is still running AIX

      For sure, all serious datacenters use Gentoo running on (dude you're getting) Dells.

      AIX is still used all over the place, Linux is not quite there yet in many areas.

      Finkployd

    6. Re:I don't know what's worse... by linzeal · · Score: 3, Interesting

      AIX still runs massive databases for big insurance companies, weather stations and criminal databases. IBM has a moderate representation on the databases and hardware they digitally store fingerprints and mugshots on. Sold them in the 80's and they have upgraded on IBM a few times since than.

    7. Re:I don't know what's worse... by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      You laugh. But AIX is still the cream of the unix crop in the financial market. They have a ridiculous support and warranty policy.

      Pretty much if you're willing to pay, IBM can get you anything. Financial companies make no hesistation about spending money in IT equipment cause they only buy once in a blue moon.

    8. Re:I don't know what's worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cheques (checks for you Americans)

      Ho ho, how very droll. If you wouldn't have provided the translation, I'll bet that none of the Americans would have understood what you were talking about! It might have been a bit more helpful if you would have also provided a phonetic spelling of the word "cheque" so that the poor Americans would have been able to impress their friends with their knowledge of Australian. After all, pretty much all that they know is that Fosters is Australian for "beer".

      -h-

    9. Re:I don't know what's worse... by Nikker · · Score: 1

      Coincidnce it returns 69 results? :)

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    10. Re:I don't know what's worse... by rf10573 · · Score: 1

      I figured out "Putting shrimps on the barby."

    11. Re:I don't know what's worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use AIX on two printers. One of the printers contains a RS/6000 workstation...

    12. Re:I don't know what's worse... by siplus · · Score: 1
      Actually, www.staples.com just converted to AIX from windows 2000....

      (I work at staples...)

    13. Re:I don't know what's worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like the University of Washington servers.

    14. Re:I don't know what's worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your mom gives even more results, even faster. And she swallows.

    15. Re:I don't know what's worse... by wwphx · · Score: 1

      What's infinitely worse is stories of people buying ex-gov't safes that were used for classified document storage that still have explosives in them.

      Unfortunately I have no cites for such at hand.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    16. Re:I don't know what's worse... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Sheesh.... it wasn't really an anti-AIX joke, you know. Stop taking it so seriously!

      It was just something I came across when I was messing around with Google; oddly, I wasn't looking for pr0n at the time, nor was I looking for AIX. (^_^)

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  4. Policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why are we suddenly complaining about Government being too open?

    1. Re:Policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you ask me, that's insightful, not funny.

  5. As an Australian... by PrivateDonut · · Score: 5, Funny

    this is why I love living in Australia! Nobody takes anything too seriously (except beer and sport, which we take very seriously)

    1. Re:As an Australian... by trime · · Score: 5, Funny

      Bruce here is head of the document security department, and is also in charge of the sheep dip.

    2. Re:As an Australian... by bmgoau · · Score: 2, Funny

      I know, we Australians certainly dont care one bit of our private information is mishandled.

    3. Re:As an Australian... by strider44 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Are we the only country with a leader who went swimming and never came back?

      (Note that, since I have space to use up for the spam filter, there are several ironically named swimming pools named after former Prime Minister Harold Holt, as well as an American Frigate.

    4. Re:As an Australian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that dingo sold my server

    5. Re:As an Australian... by Tekgno · · Score: 1

      Agreed, my last drive to Melbourne had me cracking up several times. The first one was over the swimming pool and the second was over the Penny Arcade Hairdressing Salon.

    6. Re:As an Australian... by duplo · · Score: 1

      Are we the only country with a leader who went swimming and never came back?

      Are we the only country who had a leader with the world record for drinking a yard glass of beer in 12 seconds ?

    7. Re:As an Australian... by imroy · · Score: 2, Funny

      And don't forget holidays! We take holidays ("vacations" for the yanks) very seriously.
      If a national holiday falls on a weekend, we take the following monday off instead. Can't have a perfectly good holiday go to waste now can we?

    8. Re:As an Australian... by phiwum · · Score: 1

      Are we the only country with a leader who went swimming and never came back?

      Does Germany's Ludwig II count?

      --
      Phiwum's law: anyone that names an obvious law after himself and then puts it in his own sig is just pathetic.
    9. Re:As an Australian... by mar1no · · Score: 0
      --
      "you sonofabitch i didn't know!"
    10. Re:As an Australian... by IvyKing · · Score: 1
      Note that, since I have space to use up for the spam filter, there are several ironically named swimming pools named after former Prime Minister Harold Holt, as well as an American Frigate.

      The gather of ne of my sister's friends was the first skipper of the Holt. It was later involved in the Mayaguez incident.

      Remember reading about when Holt disappeared.

  6. Data Eradication / the Nuclear Option by root_dev_X · · Score: 3, Funny

    And what, ever since I posted to /. about finding the best way to *really* wipe a harddrive I've gotten about 45 emails telling me all kinds of ways to sort out this kind of problem (I still get emails about it, and the posting was more than three years ago). Everything from a quick thermite burn to breaking into a telco exchange for some ultra-high-current bit rearrangement.

    those government types just beed to think outside the box a little more. hell, why settle for thermite - these boys have access to our nuclear arsenal!

    --
    ===== Warble://VX
    1. Re:Data Eradication / the Nuclear Option by flamearrows · · Score: 1

      This is 'straya, mate. We don't got none of those nukelear fings, we stick wit good ol fashioned hose er down, no worries mate! option.

      In other news, is there anything left that city/staterail can't screw up?

      --
      The indiscriminate use of vulgar language is the linguistic crutch of the inarticulate motherfucker
    2. Re:Data Eradication / the Nuclear Option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Australias nuclear arsenal?

    3. Re:Data Eradication / the Nuclear Option by lifespan · · Score: 0

      Yeah, didn't you know our nucular aresenal is second only to our awesome armoured personnel carriers.

      http://smh.com.au/news/National/Auditor-slams-troo p-carrier-delay/2005/07/28/1122143948326.html?onec lick=true

      So, is this the point where I make the inane crickey cobber type banter to namedrop my nationality? :)

      --
      -- Howto: Get +5 (1) Whine about M$ (2) Namedrop Gentoo (3) Casually Abuse Mods (4) Namedrop Early Computer Model
    4. Re:Data Eradication / the Nuclear Option by Kahless2k · · Score: 3, Informative

      I work in a hospital; and we have come up with a very effective way of dealing with hard drives...


      • Step 1: Low-Level Format
      • Step 2: Beat drive to bloody pulp
      • Step 3: Put said drive into the CT Scanner or MRI

      This leaves us with a blank, smashed and scrambled drive. At this point, depending on the type of data stored, the remains of the drive head off to the incinerator...

      This may sound like going overboard, but we're dealing with patient information, and we take it very seriously.

    5. Re:Data Eradication / the Nuclear Option by PhYrE2k2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah but I'd even expect them to trash the MBR and partition table... Sure the data is still there, but at least you have to go looking for it. That takes about 1/2 a second on your average PC (used to use it about 50 times a day in workstation imaging).

      But yeah- personal information should probably get at least one zero.

      -M

      --

      when you see the word 'Linux', drink!
    6. Re:Data Eradication / the Nuclear Option by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      What do you do with all the aluminium after it goes into the incinerator?

    7. Re:Data Eradication / the Nuclear Option by Bob+Wehadababyitsabo · · Score: 1

      You're lying. How exactly do you put a very magnetic drive through the MRI?

      --
      fsck -u
    8. Re:Data Eradication / the Nuclear Option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're lying. How exactly do you put a very magnetic drive through the MRI?

      Very carefully.

    9. Re:Data Eradication / the Nuclear Option by The+Evil+Couch · · Score: 1
      I used to be a sysadmin for the US Army. By reg, I was supposed to format drives like 6 times, before I could toss them in the trash.

      That's boring and time consuming.

      I said to hell with that and used a sledgehammer and didn't stop until every platter was multiple pieces. Faster and waaaaay more fun.

    10. Re:Data Eradication / the Nuclear Option by Emetophobe · · Score: 1

      I find the best way to wipe a harddrive is to defraggle the motherdisc.

    11. Re:Data Eradication / the Nuclear Option by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      increase the oxygen flow to the incinerator?

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  7. In Australia... by Orochi · · Score: 0

    In Australia, hard disks wipe you !

  8. Odd... by Revellion · · Score: 1

    Odd, this is'nt the case where i work. some of the boxes that gets decomissioned there are wiped by a low-level formatting before they're passed on. Goes to show that they don't seem to care a lot about the potentially confidential information that might be stored on em.

    --
    htop(top on stereoids): http://htop.sf.net
    1. Re:Odd... by Lectrik · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I seem to recall a few years ago watching a program that mentioned how the brittish government decomissioned some of it's hard drives.
      With a low level format, then a blast furnace, and then holding on to the smelted chunk of crud for a while. [this may have been only for stuff that was "sensative" though]
      Of course my brain sucks for holding normal info, but it kinda stood out because we do similar stuff at work, machine dies, we take it out back with a sledge hammer and a cutting torch, someone asks us to strip the machine for parts half an hour after we're tired.

      --
      --- As to make my comment seem, by comparison, more intelegent... doodie doodie doodie poop poop poop!
    2. Re:Odd... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0

      Ha!

      I think you'll find that British hard drives (or a t least those in laptops) are 'decomissioned' by being left in the back of taxis, on park benches or in pubs.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    3. Re:Odd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Data can still be recovered from a drive that has been wiped, only complete physical destruction of the drive will prevent any data recovery. Fortunately, recovering data from a wiped hard drive requires a clean room and electron microscope so you don't have to worry about the average computer geek/hacker/cracker from getting the information and contacting the media/posting it all on the internet/using it for fraud purposes.

  9. Obligatory by Arghdee · · Score: 3, Funny

    Interesting, that the blogs subtitle is:
    If it's not on fire, then it's a software problem.

    Looks like you're about to have a hardware problem :D

  10. 14 bucks? you got ripped :) by ashridah · · Score: 5, Interesting

    At ~$14USD per server, it's amazing how cheap personal information has become.
    $14 USD? You got ripped off.

    A few years back, some guy wearing a workmans uniform and holding a clipboard wandered into the (iirc) customs building here in Australia. Carted off one of the servers from a machine room, and no-one stopped them, or remembered what they looked like.
    Slashdot remembers :)

    Makes me proud to be an aussie sometimes :)

    1. Re:14 bucks? you got ripped :) by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I heard a story once from the manager of a store where someone actually managed to walk out the back door carrying a cash register. I'm sure it wasn't funny for him when it happened, though ;-)

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    2. Re:14 bucks? you got ripped :) by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Informative

      Never underestimate the power to set office workers minds at ease by wearing blue and carrying a ladder. It's a total class issue. White collar workers think blue collar workers a beneigth them and not worth challenging.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    3. Re:14 bucks? you got ripped :) by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      And the best part was that it was full of intelligence data.

      I share your pride ;)

    4. Re:14 bucks? you got ripped :) by dbIII · · Score: 4, Interesting
      customs building here in Australia. Carted off one of the servers from a machine room, and no-one stopped them, or remembered what they looked like.
      There was the first "middle eastern appearance" conclusion that was jumped to, but it appears that was only fed the the press and the internal investigation showed that there wasn't even that clue.

      There was also the incident a couple of years back when large quantites of backup tapes for three government departments were stored in wheeled garbage bins - as anyone who read this can expect the tapes ended up being dumped and lost forever, and the contractor (Telstra, the half government owned telecomunications company) was not even rapped over the knuckles for it.

      It's not just the government - I picked up an old Sun E250 for parts at an auction. To see if it worked I booted off an install CD, plugged in a serial terminal, edited a couple of files with ed (/etc/passwd and /etc/shadow I think, was a while back) to get root on reboot and was very surprised to find a lot of stuff apart from the OS still on the disks. I wasn't curious enough to find out whose it was and what was there - peril lies that way for no gain, so I just did what should have been done and repartitioned the thing.

      The opposite extreme is the clueless accountant taking to a retired server with a hammer - saying something about traces being left in the RAM - but he probably hated the thing or just wanted to smash things. If it was me there was a perfectly good 200 ton hydraulic press that could have been used in the same place, a small heat treatment furnace to get all the data off that drive by going beyond the curie temperature, a large array of machine tools and an impact testing rig.

    5. Re:14 bucks? you got ripped :) by Gob+Gob · · Score: 1, Informative

      Never underestimate the power to set office workers minds at ease by wearing blue and carrying a ladder. It's a total class issue. White collar workers think blue collar workers a beneigth them and not worth challenging.

      Wif spilling like dat u gota oneder y!

      PS: The is no class (structure) in Australia perhaps apathy, different cultures, values and amounts of cash but not class structure. Many families have blue and white collar bread winners so that kinda implies that you mean to say that within a hosehold there are two classes.

      PS: My spelling and checking is crap as well :-)

    6. Re:14 bucks? you got ripped :) by stigpalm · · Score: 2, Informative

      PPS who are you trying to kid Australia's got a class system just the same as any other country. Just another example of australians kidding themselves.

      Buy the way no one will get fired for this they are govenment employees where you can get sacked for just about anything except incompetance..

    7. Re:14 bucks? you got ripped :) by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not only are you an arsehole, you're delusional too. Are you trying to tell me that Kerry Packer is middle class? Brick layers, and factory workers, they take home the same as programmers do they? We may not have the impoverished underclass of the US but we still have class struggle in Australia.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    8. Re:14 bucks? you got ripped :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's a total class issue.
      No, it's not. It's about looking and acting like you are doing what you are supposed to be doing. Show people a picture that they are familiar with and you'll put people at ease. Show people a picture with something out of place and they'll start trying to figure out what's wrong with the situation.
    9. Re:14 bucks? you got ripped :) by rugger · · Score: 1

      Sad thing is .... these guys probably take more home then most programmers .....

    10. Re:14 bucks? you got ripped :) by rugger · · Score: 1

      There is something satisfying about bringing about the destruction of a hated machine using your own hands .... :-)

    11. Re:14 bucks? you got ripped :) by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      No, that's plumbers and electricians. Shortage of tradesmen and all.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    12. Re:14 bucks? you got ripped :) by linzeal · · Score: 1

      I was working in the Santa Clara Level 3 datacenter right after Sept 11 and an Arabic man came one night at 4 am in a frigging turban trying to get into the building by talking to people who were smoking outside. I quit smoking around that time. FYI, the FBI or some other 3-letter agency parked a van down the street that I used to wave to on the way to Denny's for a few months afterwards till they put a perimeter fence for the back. Scary shit, but anyone who wants to cripple the US economy could do some serious economic damage than to take out the datacenters in silicon valley. In my small server room we had 3000 or so websites with shopping carts and dozens of major corporations VPN off-site backup if you multiply that by a 100 you still are probably underestimating the potential damage.

    13. Re:14 bucks? you got ripped :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Traces of data can be left in RAM but it isn't easy to retrieve them. If you don't believe me, check here http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/secure_ del.html

    14. Re:14 bucks? you got ripped :) by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 1
      Never underestimate the power to set office workers minds at ease by wearing blue and carrying a ladder.


      And all this time we've been looking for Osama in a turban near a camel!
      --
      Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
    15. Re:14 bucks? you got ripped :) by Elec_Boy · · Score: 1

      Oh my god I can believe this news. They stole the Main Frame and now this other news of they guy buying them can you imagine how easy to get top secret thing from this goverment. I think you go to there webpages and you find all the info of the citizens online. Licence #, Where they Live, CC.

      --
      ElecBoy http://www.SnapPlatform.org http://snap.sf.net
    16. Re:14 bucks? you got ripped :) by HiThere · · Score: 1

      That may well be justifiable. Sorry, but I have more respect for a good craftsman than for an adequate programmer.

      OTOH, corporate execs are clearly overpaid. This is due to power politics issues (i.e., who gets to decide how much which job is worth). I don't see any way around it, if you remove the task from their preview, someone else would be making the decision...and THEY would be overpaid. (Yeah, it's more complex than that. But basically it boils down to the people who decide who gets to have a job, and how much they get paid for it will always end up being overpaid, because that's the way power politics works.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    17. Re:14 bucks? you got ripped :) by madmancarman · · Score: 1
      Never underestimate the power to set office workers minds at ease by wearing blue and carrying a ladder.

      Or carrying a professional-style camera around along with a fake laminate "press pass". It's less about class and more about appearing like you're supposed to be there.

      --
      First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Gandhi
    18. Re:14 bucks? you got ripped :) by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      I think it's more about assuming someone else has done their job. How'd the guy with the ladder get in here, oh, he must of gone through reception and surely they would have checked he was supposed to be here.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    19. Re:14 bucks? you got ripped :) by Shanep · · Score: 1

      peril lies that way for no gain, so I just did what should have been done and repartitioned the thing.

      What should have been done at an absolute minimum, is have the entire drive(s) zeroed out. If the drives held extremely sensitive data then multiple passes of random data and then zeroes, would be better.

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    20. Re:14 bucks? you got ripped :) by Gob+Gob · · Score: 1

      Look, I am very, very sorry.!!!

      I can explain!

      I live in ADELAIDE.....OK now you understand.

      Seriously though I wans't implying a "struggle" I was saying there is a difference in having different amounts of cash but compared to the rigid and obvious class distinctions of other nations ours I prefer more.

      And for you to harp on about some pissy point about has a bigger dick that is as pathetic as the points you were given.

      Now what is this class struggle you speak of? Are their some Oz Masterminds stopping you earn (if that is your measure) more to be more? (NOTE: I don't really understand your measure of class, what is class to you???).

      Anyway you called me an arsehole - only my friends do that - hello new freind!

      You win the spelling class wars as well. Dam you white-keyboarders!

  11. Not trivial though by baldvin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Its kind of hard to get rid of your data on a hard drive. You are lucky if it works, then you can try 'dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/xxx'. However, if first thay laid off their aix staff, employed some windows engineers, then they decided to sell those aix boxes... Well, well :)

    Your task is even harder if you have a hard drive that ceased operating. There exists companies like http://www.kurt.hu/ that have state of the art technology to retrieve data from damaged hard drives. If you need your data: good for you. If you'd like to get rid of it for sure: better take good care of it...

    1. Re:Not trivial though by Punboy · · Score: 1

      Works better if you use /dev/urandom

      --
      If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
    2. Re:Not trivial though by John+Seminal · · Score: 5, Funny
      Its kind of hard to get rid of your data on a hard drive.

      I found running a magnet over it is a good first step. Unscrewing it and opening it is a good second step. Taking a hammer to the internal parts is step 3. And putting the parts over a fire won't hurt. For a final step, I like to throw the hard drive in the lake of acid.

      I also pee on the hard drive. Just incase someone is smart enough to fuck me and find out what was on the hard drive, I can have the last laugh knowing they touched my pee.

      Oh, but you want to sell the hard drive, sans data? Now that gets tricky.

      Here is what I have done in the past when I wanted to sell or give away a hard drive, but did not want anything to be retrievable off the hard drive.

      I start with a format using a windows 98 floppy that will write a FAT table. I then load windows 98 on it and go to malware, spyware and those kinds of websites. When I get to 90% CPU in usage while doing nothing, I know I have enough spyware and viruses. I let them go to town on the hard drive. I delete files, and let the viruses rewrite them.

      Step 2 is putting a Debian CD in the cd-rom and reformatting the hard drive and installing Debian. I then go to websites with huge mpegs and download them until the hard drive is full of data. I delete all this data and do it all over again.

      Next is a Windows 2000 install, in NTFS. I go back to virus and malware websites, and let the hard drive get infected again.

      My final step is a simple FAT format, and the sale. If someone tries to recreate what was one the drive, they might recreate a virus. I toss the debian and large file step in the middle to over write what was written the first time. It is another layer to the cake.

      Oh, I am delusional and paranoid too. People tell me I get fanatical about shit like privacy. You might not need to go through all the steps. A simple format might be all you need, unless you suspect the person buying the hard drive has thousands of dollars in equipment and training to recreate your deleted data (like the National Security Agency in conjunction with the CIA and colonel sanders from KFC. Why would a military grade officer be selling chicken? To get closer to YOU!).

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    3. Re:Not trivial though by baldvin · · Score: 2, Insightful
      has thousands of dollars in equipment and training to recreate your deleted data (like the National Security Agency in conjunction with the CIA


      Wrong. See my previous post. You don't need the personnel, neither the equipment. The service is commercially and easily available.

      This is similar how most people that used only gui mail clients think that the From: header cannot be faked. They think that you need to be CIA to do that. However, you only need a telnet and some knowledge of an rfc...

      You are right only in that they must spying on you to do any steps, and this is definitely not something to consider as a small company. But I expect organizations like the IRS to really take care of my data. Or if they do not, I want to be able to decide what I tell them and what I don't...
    4. Re:Not trivial though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Nope, much slower and not a bit more secure. It doesn't matter what you overwrite a bit with. The remaining magnetization is different when you overwrite a 1 with a 0, a 1 with a 1, a 0 with a 0 or a 0 with a 1. If the residual magnetization from the previous content is stronger than the noise floor of your reader, then you can reconstruct the erased data, regardless of the overwrite pattern.

      If there is a reasonable chance that someone might want your data bad enough to attempt reconstruction of overwritten data, then you should a) never store unencrypted data and b) still never sell the harddrive.

      Otherwise overwriting with zeroes is sufficient.

    5. Re:Not trivial though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kind of hard? it's intensely trivial.

      We've always burnt ours. Nothing a small boiler furnace won't take care of. I don't care what kind of tinfoil hat you all wear, but nothing will get the bits off the molten aluminium or glass that flows out of drives after 10 minutes inside one of those.

      10 minutes. It is trivial.

    6. Re:Not trivial though by baldvin · · Score: 1

      10 minutes. It is trivial.

      Hey, then you lose those 14 bucks, since you can't sell your machines anymore!!! :)

    7. Re:Not trivial though by putko · · Score: 1

      Odd that you god modded "Troll" for what is such a funny post.

      I just throw it in a lake of acid, and leave it at that. I can't figure out why more people don't just do this.

      --
      http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/when_to_s tone_your_children/dt21_18a.html
    8. Re:Not trivial though by hankwang · · Score: 1
      Wrong. See my previous post. You don't need the personnel, neither the equipment. The service is commercially and easily available

      You two seem to be talking about different things. The Hungarian company you mention does not claim that it can recover overwritten data. However, it can recover deleted files, similar to Norton's and PC-Tools' undelete tool under DOS in the old days. Moreover, they can recover data from drives that are electronically or mechanically defective.

      The grandparent (which is funny rather than troll) was suggesting that the physically overwritten 1s and 0s can be recovered provided you have a few 100.000 dollars of equipment. The latter never been demonstrated possible for a modern hard disk.

    9. Re:Not trivial though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May I ask where you live that you can just throw your stuff into a lake of acid? Don't you have environment protection laws? Around here the government would never allow me to pollute acid lakes like that.

    10. Re:Not trivial though by ghoda_x · · Score: 1

      ...and colonel sanders from KFC. Why would a military grade officer be selling chicken? To get closer to YOU!).

      See, that's why I never eat at KFC anymore. It just seemed a little fishy to me...

      --

      Give me but one firm spot on which to stand, and I will move the earth.
      - Archimedes
    11. Re:Not trivial though by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

      I never realized there is an actual use for viruses and such. That would be fun though. I'd probably cut down the steps to just two.

      1) Format hard drive and reinstall Windows.

      2) Using Google, search xxx and click on all those pornography sites. I'm sure that will load you with some viruses.

    12. Re:Not trivial though by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Its kind of hard to get rid of your data on a hard drive.

      In AIX, you just insert the System Diagnostics CD and tell it to scrub the disk. This is actually apparently US DOD-compliant, so it should probably suffice. Overwriting the disk about a dozen times with various patterns of data is apparently enough to render old data inaccessible.

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    13. Re:Not trivial though by baldvin · · Score: 1
      The Hungarian company you mention does not claim that it can recover overwritten data. However, it can recover deleted files, similar to Norton's and PC-Tools' undelete tool under DOS in the old days. Moreover, they can recover data from drives that are electronically or mechanically defective.


      Just because they do claim at the first page that they "undelete" your files if you like, it does not mean that they don't do something else if needed -- and yes, paid for. But not the price that you should if you made it yourself.

      They are a bunch of people who were originally trained to create a hard drive manufactury with adequate research capabilities. The manufactury was never built, but the research experts groupped together.

      Actually, they get orders from all over the world, sometimes hard drives come with dedicated private airplanes :)

      So, I think, if it is possible, they will collect the data, because they do have everything that is needed...
    14. Re:Not trivial though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is it worth the Government's worthwhile to sell these servers for AU$20 each? Or at least they could have taken a sledge hammer to the HDDs. They don't seem to have made much money from this sale.

      Also, this guy isn't even talking about poor data wiping technique. They didn't even format the drive; it was trivial to get the data off (plug in machine, turn on.).

    15. Re:Not trivial though by hankwang · · Score: 1
      Just because they do claim at the first page that they "undelete" your files if you like, it does not mean that they don't do something else if needed

      I find that a strange argument. Anyway, see: Can Intelligence Agencies Read Overwritten Data?. Quote: "It it would take more than a year to scan a single platter with recent MFM technology, and tens of terabytes of image data would have to be processed."

    16. Re:Not trivial though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Its kind of hard to get rid of your data on a hard drive. "

      It remains me of my period when I was working for L&H where they drilled holes in the hard drives if they weren't needed anymore.

    17. Re:Not trivial though by DRobson · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try Darik's-boot-and-nuke, pretty damn easy especially if you set it up to auto wipe things on boot. Last time I tried it there was next to no user intervention needed (And that was a while back). http://dban.sourceforge.net/

    18. Re:Not trivial though by MadCow42 · · Score: 1

      I just wrote a little script that writes random crap the the hard drives until they're full. Then, it deletes everything and starts over.

      Run that a dozen times or so (automated) then do a low level format, and anyone that can reconstruct the data is welcome to it.

      My drives undergo this on the free space automatically every night (without the format of course)... just in case.

      MadCow.

      --
      I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
    19. Re:Not trivial though by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      3) Fill hard drive with plenty of porn. Everyone looking at the contents will assume they just caught a lazy, porn-addicted nerd. No further analysis will happen ;-)

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    20. Re:Not trivial though by rikkards · · Score: 1

      Question is if DOD will sell the drives after wiping them? I suspect not. DND (Canada's military) won't they use (DOD Compliant) disk wiping only when the drive (machine) gets allocated from one person to another.

    21. Re:Not trivial though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with writing random data is that it's pretty easy to tell when gibberish is just gibberish. There is such a thing as a sequence of bytes being "too random".

    22. Re:Not trivial though by Kent+Recal · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unless you know more about secure data deletion than Peter Gutmann you should use wipe for the job and not attempt to re-invent it. Wipe is open source and has been available for almost 10 years.

    23. Re:Not trivial though by bluGill · · Score: 2, Insightful

      tens of terabytes are fairly cheap these days (as in less than the labor for the tech doing the scanning). How important is that data that you forgot to backup? With $20 million? If so, spending a couple hundred thousand to read it is a good idea. Not as good as just having enough backups of course, but that has been ruled out.

    24. Re:Not trivial though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't work so well on the AIX boxes in question though, since Windows doesn't tend to run on Power platforms...

    25. Re:Not trivial though by mibus · · Score: 1

      See, that's why I never eat at KFC anymore. It just seemed a little fishy to me...

      Fishy? Weird. Whenever I've eaten there, everything's tasted like chicken...

    26. Re:Not trivial though by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      i think the DOD uses a blast furnace

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  12. Government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Makes you wonder how many governmental organizations even know how important properly disposing of a computer can be.

    Or if the government really cares. Who's going to arrest them? There's no risk of punishment here.

    1. Re:Government by mistfall · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Given the number of governments that flirt with the concept of ID cards (especially when the bombs go off) aren't you glad they practise such strong safeguards when it comes to data?

    2. Re:Government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or if the government really cares. Who's going to arrest them? There's no risk of punishment here.

      Only if you're trading music online. Or providing links to where people trade music online.

    3. Re:Government by Matey-O · · Score: 1

      We're not ALL incompetent. We'd purchased two NAS boxes from Dell/EMC. Turns out they sold a total of SIX before droppiong the line and all support. (Due to extreme suckage I guess) After we negotiated out of that one, we were stuck with two boxes that needed to be surplussed (which I'd hoped to scrounge for a song after the fact....2 Tb of Raid storage in my basement woulda been nice.)

      Unfortunately Dell/EMC, in their incompetence, couldn't figure out how to DOD wipe the drives. So they dot disassembled and passed out amongst the staff. I've got a pretty statue made up of HD platters and magnets now.

      Woulda preferred the storage in my basement tho.

      --
      "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    4. Re:Government by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 1

      Exactly, I work in the administrative offices for a large public university. Most IT services tend to be decentralized or only partially centralized. Some offices hire grad assistants to do most of their IT work. Many offices just have one fulltime IT guy and there is no central IT orientation or anything. We may have policies in place that cover end of life data security, but they are not enforced, and at least half of the admins probably don't know what they are.

      Obviously most government institutions don't rely on graduate assistants for IT work, but I imagine there are a very large number of independent departmentalized offices that have no idea what the policies are.

      Say the Burlington office of unemployment counseling division is a small work group of 8 computers managed by someone who happens to know enough to keep them running. Generally speaking, they are not going to understand end of life data security needs.

      And then there's probably a whole group of smart knowledgeable people who understand the need for data security but who think a quick format will take care of everything. A quick format blows away tables but leaves data intact. Anyone with a hex editor can still extract oodles of data.

    5. Re:Government by bsquizzato · · Score: 1

      Who's going to arrest them... why, the government of course. The government arrests people in the government lots you know ;)

    6. Re:Government by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      As someone who has been responcible for disposing of the local FBI offices hardware I can tell you they're atleast mildly responcible. I work for a comapany that handles, among other things, secure data destrcution, and received a pallat of FBI laptops with cool names like "WMD Laptop" and "Project Saber use only". All of the laptops were ordered to be completely destroyed with none of the parts going to resale or refurbishing, even things of little or no security risk like processors. The final step was all of the hardcrives going through a giant industrial shredder and being mixed in with the shredded remains of hundreds of other harddrives.

    7. Re:Government by PFAK · · Score: 1

      Let's hope you can destroy drives better than you can spell.

      --

      Free means no restrictions, ironic the FSF's GPL forces restrictions, isn't it? What's your definition of free?
    8. Re:Government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes you wonder how many governmental organizations even know how important properly disposing of a computer can be.

      What is a "governmental organization"? Do you mean government department? They ALL know how important media sanitization is prior to disposal. There are guidelines.

      Or if the government really cares. Who's going to arrest them? There's no risk of punishment here.

      Score:5, Interesting?!?!

      In Australia, government and the courts are seperate and the government IS accoutable for wrong doing.

      I have worked for the AU government in the role of disk sanitization in the past. The fact is, that governments have crap loads of people working for them, sometimes mistakes are made and sometimes a mistake can be as innocent as hiring the "wrong" contractor. The majority of the time when the government does do the correct thing, it is not news. Every now and then someone fucks up, it makes the news and people think stupid things like those of your "interesting" comments.

    9. Re:Government by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      Thankfully for your piece of mind I don't run the shredder. I also don't undersatand why people bother to comment on spelling. I know how to spell. I know how to use spellcheck. I don't bother. If you think the thousands of readers of /. are that worth impressing you go right ahead. I'll stick to making relevant posts.

  13. You understand that... by PrivateDonut · · Score: 5, Insightful

    if this guy planned on doing anything with the data, he probably wouldn't have blogged about it. He would copy the data, wipe the disks and pretend that he had seen nothing.

    Then at a later date, he could do his evil work using that data.

    Therefore, this particular blunder is nothing to get worked up about, but the potential for future blunders is.

    1. Re:You understand that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He might not plan to use it for nefarious purposes, but I don't for one second buy his claim that he didn't poke around the databases.

    2. Re:You understand that... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Or previous blunders where the people who bought the computers immediately called their mate Tony to call his mate Ivan to get in touch with his uncle in the russian mafia to sell this stuff to spammers.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    3. Re:You understand that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or he blogged about it thinking that no one would believe he would blog about if he had evil intentions.

      Then while everyone is not worrying...blammo, you're pO\/\/NED.

  14. This would never happen in the UK.! by matthew.thompson · · Score: 2, Informative

    Because we have rules which force government agencies to keep data for a certain amount of time. To get around this much of the data that was to be covered by this was wiped before the rules came into force :)

    --
    Matt Thompson - Actuality - Insert product here.
    1. Re:This would never happen in the UK.! by Ingolfke · · Score: 1

      I could be wrong, but don't the regulations apply to how long you have to keep the information, not where you have to keep it? So in this case, if the government had consolidated all of this information onto a new server, thereby still keeping it, they would have been in compliance with the regulations, but still managed to release all of the personal information.

    2. Re:This would never happen in the UK.! by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      There are rules to prevent all sorts of things. Speeding, murder, etc. Doesn't seem to actually stop all of it.

      Rules are there to intimidate the clueful, and to punish the malicious and/or clueless.

  15. Negligence? by John+Seminal · · Score: 1
    How is this not negligence? The only problem is how can a person know if their personal information was on one of those servers? I got a feeling everyone will deny, deny, deny everything.

    Secondly, where the hell can anyone get a server for $14. Even if this is a dual p200 pro, that can still make a good home email server. At one point and time, that server was probably the best available. It is just a matter of finding old enough software to use.

    And since we are talking servers, maybe someone can give me adivce. I want to start an on-line forum. I expect a maximum load of 100 people at the same time maximum, with an avarage load of 15-25 people. I was looking and Dell has some servers that are around $400 for a P4. But someone told me for a database you NEED a dual Xeon or the database will be super slow. So I looked on ebay, and found some dual Xeon 650's with 1 gig for $400-600 (most come with 3 scsi hard drives in raid). This beats the $1600+ that Dell wants for a dual Xeon 2.2ghz. On ebay, I even found a quad Xeon 550 with 1 gig memory and 5 9.1 scsi cheeta hard drives for less than half of the Dell Xeon. But I don't have any OS that will use 4 CPU's.

    What do I need?

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:Negligence? by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      What do I need?

      You need to do some actual measurements of the performance load you're going to put on the server. Depending on the queries you're doing a Dual Xeon could be extreme overkill, or not nearly enough.

      --
      AccountKiller
    2. Re:Negligence? by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      *BSD and Linux both support multiproc SMP, and with a price of free....

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    3. Re:Negligence? by nmos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On ebay, I even found a quad Xeon 550 with 1 gig memory and 5 9.1 scsi cheeta hard drives for less than half of the Dell Xeon. But I don't have any OS that will use 4 CPU's.

      What do I need?


      Any major Linux Distro will handle 4 CPUs just fine.

    4. Re:Negligence? by MaineCoon · · Score: 1

      If it's just a forum, you can probably get away with very low specs... say, a 300 mhz machine and 10 gig drive. Especially with those requirements. 100 people aren't going to be reading 100 messages a second. Unless you are running a heavy utilization database, which a 100-people-at-a-time forum doesn't get close to, you don't need to worry about performance. There are other things you can do too, such as caching. Consider upgrading when you hit 1000 or more people at a time.

      I host about a dozen websites off such a machine, some with forums. The hardware is between 5 and 9 years old (newer 9 gig SCSI HD, a 270 mhz G3 CPU upgrade card... it's an old Power Computing machine).

      CPU usage averages 5%, and that's because of all the friggin spam it gets, for hosting a few 7-10 year old domains and email addresses that haven't changed for years (mine alone pulls in 2000-3000 spam/day).

      Bandwidth and dedicated connection will be your real concern. Go for the cheapest reliable system you can get, put Linux on it, install something like phpbb or the like.

      --
      Hunt your preferred prey at Aliens vs Predator MUD. Join the war at avpmud.com port 4000
    5. Re:Negligence? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      Secondly, where the hell can anyone get a server for $14. Even if this is a dual p200 pro, that can still make a good home email server.

      If you RTFA, you'll see these are RS/6000 E20 boxes. They're most likely running single 133mhz 603e PPC processors. You could use them as a home server, but since you can get ex-gov P3/450 wintel machines for not much more, why would you bother?

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    6. Re:Negligence? by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1

      A good hosting service.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    7. Re:Negligence? by John+Seminal · · Score: 1
      it's just a forum, you can probably get away with very low specs... say, a 300 mhz machine and 10 gig drive

      That sounds awfully underpowered for a forum because of the database.

      I want a multi processor unit. I know the database will need that extra CPU.

      My problem is trying convince myself that I don't need a new Dell Xeon 2.2ghz machine, that I can get by with a dual Xeon 600 from ebay.

      If the forum grows, what I will do is put the web host on one dual Xeon and the database on a second dual Xeon. I don't like the idea of having the database on the same system as the web server.

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    8. Re:Negligence? by ocelotbob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Really, a database machine needs more RAM than CPU speed. The more RAM you have, the larger the dataset it can keep in cache, and the less it has to go to the hard drive to pick up information. You'd be fine with a single proc machine; save the money and get a good uniproc motherboard that can accept 4 1 gig sticks of RAM instead.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    9. Re:Negligence? by Keruo · · Score: 1

      I ran something similar on uniproc 1,6gig sempron with 512 memory.
      The server had ~300 active users at peak hours and processed something like 50-100 queries/second.(daily average)
      The server load never exceeded 30% and performance was snappy enough.

      My advice, don't throw away thousands of dollars if you can get away with less to start with.
      Try running the forum and database on lower end machine first, and if you want, you can try stress-testing it with load generators to see wether it performs well enough.
      If it can't handle the load, upgrade.

      --
      There are no atheists when recovering from tape backup.
    10. Re:Negligence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have some issues understanding how a forum can possibly be so tough on the database server...
      I mean 300 Mhz is not at all that slow, especially if you index it properly. It's actually all in the database design. For example, i just (for testing purposes) made a select-statement on a table with over 1 million records and a couple of joins. 100 ms. Indices are the thang.

      It sounds more than a little bit to me that you just want a multiprocessor server for the (not very) fun of it.

    11. Re:Negligence? by dbIII · · Score: 1
      Secondly, where the hell can anyone get a server for $14. Even if this is a dual p200 pro
      It's an RS6000 with an IBM PowerPC - and it's cheap because a lot of people are assuming intel hardware and Microsoft - while with stuff of that age nobody could have said Microsoft and server in the same sentance without stifling a laugh - and no, it will not have the speed of a single p200 pro. That said, it could still be used as a small office mail server, serving up static web pages, or what I use one for - to run a couple of tape drives.

      If I'd known these were going so cheap I might have got one as a spare - but when the old one dies I've got a couple of other spots where I can put the drives if I buy different cables, so it's probably not worth it. The keyboards on the terminals like the one shown in the article are fantastic (and very expensive new), so would be worth it if there was the info to adapt them to a PS2 connection.

    12. Re:Negligence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A single P4, athlon64 or Xeon 1.5Ghz+ will be able to crunch data faster than a dual Xeon 600. Think about it - the number of operations per clock cycle is roughly the same so doubling the clock speed is equivalent to putting in a second processor. It's a little more complicated than that, but not much.

      If I were you I'd write the site on my desktop and load test it there - buying hardware is the last step.

  16. You should be happy by Sloppy · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's .. um .. transparent government. Yeah, that's it.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  17. Possibly the best reason to encrypt data from day1 by anti-NAT · · Score: 2, Informative

    At least then you know that if the drive dies and you don't physically destroy it, for somebody to copy the data they'll have to do more than just get the drive going again.

    PCB board failures are the problem. The drive won't work, yet the data on the platters is likely to still be good. PCB failures are also fairly easy to recover from - just go to ebay to buy a second hand drive of the same model, and swap the PCBs over. If it is easy for you to do, it is also easy for your adversaries.

    Even if you sell a working drive, as long as you don't provide the customer with the passphrase for the encrypted filesystem where your important data resides (I'm sure I don't have to point out how stupid doing that would be), you can be sure that the above story is unlikely to happen to you.

    --
    The Internet's nature is peer to peer - 20050301_cs_profs.pdf
  18. This is a CLM by Bunyip+Redgum · · Score: 1

    This is a Career Limiting Move for someone!

  19. eek by dysprosia · · Score: 1

    for sale at an government auction for ~$20 AUD a server

    To me, a more serious problem is why I didn't make a bid myself...$20 for a server!...

  20. Does he have a license to the source now? by mveloso · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just wondering. He bought the computer and its contents from the government, so does he have rights to the source on the box?

    1. Re:Does he have a license to the source now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no formally agreed upon license. So my guess is that he might run into problems if he uses the source code inappropriately, like selling it off or licensing it to a 3rd party without permission from the copyright holder. IP matters are tricky if you don't have a license that spells out your rights.

      Any Copyright lawyers in da house who can answer this properly? I'd like to know too because it's an interesting question.

    2. Re:Does he have a license to the source now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Just wondering. He bought the computer and its contents from the government, so does he have rights to the source on the box?

      Had this occurred in the United States, it would depend on who wrote the code. If it was written by the government, then it is in the public domain so he could do anything he wants with it.

      If it was written by an outside contractor that granted the government rights to redistribute the code, he would have permission to use the code personally, but not to copy or distribute it. He would also not be allowed to create derivative works.

      If the code was written by an outside contractor that did not grant the government rights to redistribute the code, then he and the government would both be guilty of copyright infringement.

      There is also the consideration that depending on the license, the government may or may not have rights to transfer the license to a third party. If the government had a site license, they could not transfer a license for one copy to a third party. On the other hand, if they had a boxed copy of the software (such as the operating system), they could.

    3. Re:Does he have a license to the source now? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      I would think that it would be no different than finding a book in a government box. You would be free to use the book, but not copy it.

      Depending on who you talk to, you don't need a license to use software - just to distribute it...

  21. Aussie Aussie Aussie! by felonius+maximus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Anyone?

    1. Re:Aussie Aussie Aussie! by Inverted+Pilot · · Score: 1

      Oi Oi Oi!

  22. Re:Possibly the best reason to encrypt data from d by baldvin · · Score: 1
    they'll have to do more than just get the drive going again

    People also mistakenly think that it is a lot more. No. That's why I mentioned http://www.kurt.hu./ Not very cheap, but not exclusive either. And they get out the bare disks in their laboratory, and read the data without even the mechanics working in the drive.
  23. Goverment? by Stuart+Gibson · · Score: 4, Funny
    Govermental Servers Wiped? Never!

    "Eighteen AIX servers purchased from goverment via auction"
    So, is this genuinely how government is spelt in Australia, or are the editors too lazy to pick up on a glaringly obvious spelling mistake...

    Twice.

    Stuart
    --
    It's all fun and games until a 200' robot dinosaur shows up and trashes Neo-Tokyo... Again
    1. Re:Goverment? by Fortyseven · · Score: 1

      Funny, I didn't even notice that until you pointed it out. That whole thing where the brain does real-time error correction while reading kicked in, I suppose. You know, where the first and last letters are right, but the middle junk is scrambled and you can still read it as the right word when reading fast?

      goevrnemnt

      Weird. :)

      Still sloppy, though.

    2. Re:Goverment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I thought it's spelled gov'mint.

    3. Re:Goverment? by Nqdiddles · · Score: 1

      No, that's not how we spell it. But if we're too lazy to wipe our severs, why would we bother with correct spelling? Long live the typically Aussie laconic attitude!

      --
      And that kids is how I met your mother.
    4. Re:Goverment? by Tekgno · · Score: 1

      Hrm, I read that last one as grover mints.

      Would they be mints kept in a blue pocket and covered in fluff?

    5. Re:Goverment? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      So, is this genuinely how government is spelt in Australia

      No, if you RTFA Geoffrey Huntley says "Early last week eighteen IBM RS/6000 E20 servers went up for sale at an government auction for ~$20 AUD a server,...", so it was the retarded submitter. (Though Geoff might reconsider the "an".) As is longstanding Slashdot policy, the editors don't edit (I don't know what they do, aside from randomly choosing an article subitted by some naive noobie or self-promoting asshole).

    6. Re:Goverment? by dbIII · · Score: 1
      So, is this genuinely how government is spelt in Australia
      No, the correct spelling is guvmint, as used in the phrase "I'm agin the guvmint!" or in the other form "Govermental as anything".

      Seriously, anyone who criticises spelling and grammar on a global web forum should realise that while you can gauge and colour your response for your own country not even the dictionary in another country is always going to agree with you. If you are from the USA you can say "fanny pack" with a straight face, because it is a simple carry bag - but the name makes other english speakers laugh.

    7. Re:Goverment? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      Follow up to myself: aside from fucking up the /b closing mark, I see that Geoff was in fact the submitter, though he didn't make the error in his blog.

    8. Re:Goverment? by justforaday · · Score: 1

      Which is why everyone everywhere should agree that the correct spelling is gubmint.

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    9. Re:Goverment? by Fortyseven · · Score: 1

      How else would a civilized person transport mints? :O

    10. Re:Goverment? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      No, the correct spelling is guvmint, as used in the phrase "I'm agin the guvmint!"

      While "guvmint" might be acceptable Strine, "agin" sounds rather more Redneck to me.

    11. Re:Goverment? by dickrichardv8 · · Score: 1

      Gubmint? That sounds like it should come from G.W.B. or maybe L.B.J. That Lousiana or Eastern Texas language, ha!

  24. Reminds me of when I worked for US government... by Anti-Trend · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I used to work for city government here in SoCal, USA. In contrast to our Aussie friends, they were super paranoid about data leakage. When there was actually a situation where the red tape was momentarily pierced and we were authorized to give away outdated equipment to schools, they made us do a multiple-pass low-level format on each and every HDD that left the building. A royal pain-in-the-ass more than a security consideration -- none of those machines had anything which would be of much interest to anybody. If you ask me, the most damning piece of information one could gleam from those systems wasn't in the HDD at all. Rather, it's the glaring question of why there were gaming-class video and sound cards in all of the upper-management's old PCs, and nothing but cheap Trident cards in the CAD workstations of the time...

    -AT

    --
    Working in a DevOps shop is like playing in a band made up entirely of keytarists.
  25. In my department... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...we don't let a hard drive out the door. All storage media(disks, tapes, CD/DVD, etc) remain in the buildings unless encrypted(laptops) or we are certain they contain no protected data - such as educational CDROMs, etc. Everything else is dismantled and destroyed. For example, CDs and HDD platters are sanded, tape is shredded.

    Anything that goes to auction is diskless, and we cannot return a drive under warranty as it's impossible to securely erase a faulty drive, or, for that matter, a good drive - think bad sector remapping.

    We're Federal Government, not State, BTW.

    1. Re:In my department... by necrogram · · Score: 1

      Sounds like my agency. We let drives with public knowledge out with just a DoD spec wiping. confidential and classifed drives are only to be desposed of in an incenorator. My state has a good number of broad laws covering how the data is to be handled, and its possible jail time if you screw up

  26. regulations won't help by xmodem_and_rommon · · Score: 1

    You really thing that the government is going to let a couple of pissy little regulations get in the way of accidentally distributing personal information? I don't think so.

  27. Blatant theivery. by felonius+maximus · · Score: 2, Insightful
    some guy wearing a workmans uniform and holding a clipboard ... Carted off one of the servers from a machine room

    I have heard a similar story about two guys in blue overalls walking out of David Jones (or some other department store) carrying a big-screen TV, and noone stopped them either.

    Makes me proud to be an aussie

    Y'know, it's interesting to note that all our greatest heroes are thieves and brigands. Go Aussie!

    1. Re:Blatant theivery. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE
      OY OY OY

    2. Re:Blatant theivery. by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Interesting

      there was a wave of laptop thefts in large companies a year or two back here... done by people who wore suits, they just walked into the open offices and wandered off with the laptops.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Blatant theivery. by ashridah · · Score: 1

      Y'know, it's interesting to note that all our greatest heroes are thieves and brigands. Go Aussie!
      speak for yourself, My hero is tridge!

  28. server specs by xmodem_and_rommon · · Score: 1

    that stuff about database performance is pure BS. I use my 700mhz p3 256MB RAM laptop for web (php) development, and I run a mysql database on it. Stress testing shows that it can handle over 20 requests per second without breaking into a sweat I'd say you need a masimum of 1ghz with 512mb of RAM

  29. I would like to place a bid on that by jurt1235 · · Score: 1

    $14 for an AIX server, shipping and handling costs more, carrying them to the trashbin costs more. This is really a good deal, even for really old machines.

    Anyway, if you do not want anybody to get the data, format the disks, low level if possible, remove the disks, open them up and use sanding paper on the platters before destroying them by bending or cutting them in two. Should do the trick.

    --

    My wife's sketchblog Blob[p]: Gastrono-me
  30. same thing happened to me by webdwarf · · Score: 2, Informative

    We bought a second hand server from ebay which was from someone that buys ex govt stuff from auctions and it had a backup tape in it from the Brisbane Magistrates Court (Australia)

  31. Australian Law says you must now wipe.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If you have signed all usual secrecy and privacy forms before.

    The best you can do is to sent STA a stiff invoice for professional data sanitation. Fix ther wagon!

    If you are outraged, tell the STA Union their members details were leaked because a slack security (any excuse to strike), tell the State Auditor, tell tax, and the privacy commissioner. Butts will be kicked.

    The auction mob were slack, they are meant to wipe the data, and remove all identifying stickers. But the real blame lies higher up.

    Conclusions. The STA are as reliable as their timetables, and going to windows will be more risky than ever, if their admins default everything.

  32. rub their noses in it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's good to know that in this cold mechanical corporate world, humans still some times make mistakes. obviously the best thing to do was rub their noses in it, and maybe even get someone fired. Hey it got you hits. what happened to mateship? would it have been so ethically wrong, to contact the seller, say they may have made a mistake, and took steps to rectify the situation? sure it's negligent, but c'mon, we are still human

  33. Mirror's by NextWish · · Score: 1

    Mirrors:
    - MirrorDot.
    - Coral CDN.
    The images on the main site have been switched over to use CoralCDN

    Currently pushing out just over 2Mbit's:
    http://img49.imageshack.us/img49/9388/slashdot0731 8zk.png

    1. Re:Mirror's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  34. Cheaper ways... by pimpimpim · · Score: 5, Insightful
    There was a case in the Netherlands where a state prosecutor just put his personal pc at the trash when it didn't work anymore due to spyware:

    http://www.expatica.com/source/site_article.asp?su bchannel_id=19&story_id=13469&name=The+Dutch+news+ in+October+2004
    see october 7th 2004

    Some taxi-driver found it, discovered that it had very sensitive information about some current open cases on it, and a lot of personal stuff that could make the prosecutor vulnerable for blackmail etc. when in the wrong hands.

    These things just show that some state organisations (or the people working there) have really too little awareness of handling computer data the right way. Actually this year we had a case in the netherlands where some secret state report ended up in an upload filesharing folder of the person working on it, and thereby just could spread all over. I think people working at such positions really should be instructed on safe computing, especially at home or using laptops, the risks are pretty high that data can get stolen.

    --
    molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    1. Re:Cheaper ways... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't trust those spyware companies either!

    2. Re:Cheaper ways... by legirons · · Score: 1

      "There was a case in the Netherlands where a state prosecutor just put his personal pc at the trash when it didn't work anymore due to spyware:"

      Does it even matter who found the PC? The information on it was already available to the spyware authors, who might be even more interested than taxi drivers in government confidential files

    3. Re:Cheaper ways... by MavEtJu · · Score: 1

      Some taxi-driver found it, discovered that it had very sensitive information about some current open cases on it, and a lot of personal stuff that could make the prosecutor vulnerable for blackmail etc. when in the wrong hands.

      To which he immediately brought it...

      (Yes I'm not a fan of PRdV)

      --
      bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
  35. you know they could have just.... by thegoogler · · Score: 5, Informative
    used dban, its not rocket science. just put the disk in and hit ok

    o wait, this is the goverment, nevermind

    1. Re:you know they could have just.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, because you can just pop dban into an AIX-based PowerPC system and it'll work right off the bat. Or not.

      The government should know better, but it's not as trivial as it sounds for the technically-disinclined. Heck, the dept responsible for auctioning off the computers may not know a thing about them.

    2. Re:you know they could have just.... by leonbev · · Score: 1

      This is an RS/6000, so that disk probably won't work. It's probably just easier to just boot off of the AIX install CD and nuke the file systems that way.

    3. Re:you know they could have just.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course some of the best rocket scientist we have are government. This may not be such a good thing, but take it as you wish.

    4. Re:you know they could have just.... by justins · · Score: 2, Informative

      "o wait" There's no AIX version of dban. Duh.

      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    5. Re:you know they could have just.... by Shanep · · Score: 1

      o wait, this is the goverment, nevermind

      Joke as you will, but there are standards and guidelines put out by governments around the World regarding disk sanitization. Some private companies then adhere to them and some don't. It is not just governments which make mistakes. Governments do actually have some very smart people working for them.

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
  36. This is normal here in Italy by asbesto · · Score: 0

    it's normal here to recover servers from public administration sites, having them perfectly working with all data inside :)

  37. Civil servants are generally bludgers by threaded · · Score: 1

    Would be too much aggro to do the job right.

  38. Data Protection? by HugePedlar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The UK's Data Protection Act, especially as it pertains to medical data, is remarkably strict.

    Nonetheless, it came as no surprise to me that, when I worked at a medical centre and they upgraded all their machines, the old ones were merely dumped in the attic before being carted off by the local Council's binmen.

    I asked about this (not in terms of security, but because I wanted the machines). Apparently UK companies have to PAY the Council to removed old computers, as part of some enviromental legislation. I offered to take them away for free, naturally.

    The only reason I didn't get any "protected" data along with them was because I'd previously wiped it off. But even that was little more than a standard "empty recycle-bin" - it likely wouldn't stop anyone who knew what they were doing.


    It's all very well having data protection policies, but unless you tell officials HOW to erase data, it won't be done.

    --
    Argh.
    1. Re:Data Protection? by Winkhorst · · Score: 1

      But remember, it's ILLEGAL to use any of this data for nefarious purposes! No one would even consider doing so because their elected representatives DID something about the problem by passing law #187,302 that everyone immediately went and memorized so they wouldn't violate its terms accidentally.

      The fact is, the whole concept of legislating solutions to real world problems is flawed in a world where no one in their right mind still believes they will be punished by the gods for breaking the law. And there isn't enough sense of community to make it emotionally painful to harm the interests of ones friends and neighbors.

      --
      "Is this Winkhorst a nova criminal?" "No just a technical sergeant wanted for interrogation."
  39. About that $20 per server by BBCWatcher · · Score: 2, Informative
    The E20 would be a 32-bit PowerPC-based (604) server of the 100 MHz to 233 MHz variety (probably 100 MHz). Hard disk sizes would likely be in the 9 GB per disk range. Memory would be around 256 MB or perhaps more if upgraded. But the real limiting factor is that AIX support for the 32-bit hardware is coming to a close. (The 64-bit hardware has been available for quite some time now, and the latest AIX doesn't even run on 32-bit hardware.)

    These servers could be nicely rehabilitated with Linux, however. In fact, they might make excellent testbeds for developers who wish to compile for Linux on POWER (in lowest common denominator fashion). And IBM hardware is deservedly respected for its quality, and these are server-class machines (unlike, say, a PowerPC 604-based Macintosh). So the buyer did very well, IMHO.

  40. ...really bad impersonation of Rolf Harris... by jd · · Score: 4, Funny

    "...And he sang as he laughed as he carted off the server rack - you'll come a-waltzing Matilda with me!"

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:...really bad impersonation of Rolf Harris... by Tekgno · · Score: 1
      I need mod points :(


      Somebody please mod this up.

  41. 32-Bit AIX by BBCWatcher · · Score: 1
    Ooops, I take that back. AIX 5.3 supports a 32-bit multiprocessor kernel that is compatible with all CHRP systems, including uniprocessor models. I misread that. So it looks like the buyer did even better than I thought.

    Debian runs on CHRP systems, so the E20 would make a pretty good Debian Linux system.

    1. Re:32-Bit AIX by BBCWatcher · · Score: 1
      Let's try this again... :-) The E20 is not a CHRP system (evidently) but should be PReP. Thus it will run AIX up through 5.1 (but not 5.2 or 5.3), and so its support days are at best limited. Debian Linux *does* support the PReP systems.

      Just to give you an idea of the age of this server, the E20 debuted in 1995 (at 100 MHz). There were some processor upgrade options released later. Maximum system memory is 512 MB, I believe.

  42. Shoulda used... by Mechcozmo · · Score: 2, Informative
    http://www.killdisk.com/

    I've only used the free demo but its a great floppy. And it runs FreeDOS too.

    1. Re:Shoulda used... by goingtohell · · Score: 1

      windows NT scandisk/checkdisk

    2. Re:Shoulda used... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all of this would be nice if it booted on a IBM AIX machine.. wouldn't it.

      Remember forks the whole does not run on x86.

      ~AC

    3. Re:Shoulda used... by Scooter · · Score: 1

      That's a very good point. You would need to take the disks out of the RS6000 (what were those back then?) and connect them to a system that you could boot one of these tools. dban, for example, supports x86 and Mac PPC. The beta version is ported to Sparc and RiSC (it's a Busybox/Linux based tool).

  43. Re:Reminds me of when I worked for US government.. by QuaZar666 · · Score: 1

    You have to ask that question? No matter where I have worked upper management always gets high end computers that they will never use, and at the same time the person that needs the system gets a system that is rather underpowered for what he/she needs.

    -Qua

  44. Easy Get-Rich-Quick Scheme! by zaguar · · Score: 1

    1:Buy decommisioned high-level government servers.
    2:Find confidential data on said servers.
    3:Sell said information to interested parties
    4:??????
    5:Profit!

    --
    "Sure there's porn and piracy on the Web but there's probably a downside too."
    1. Re:Easy Get-Rich-Quick Scheme! by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      I shouldn't be this pedantic on Sunday afternoon but that timeless classic only works if there is no obvious way to make profit.

      1:Buy decommisioned high-level government underpants.
      2:??????
      3:Profit!

      or

      1:Start a .com company that sells dog food over the Internet.
      2:??????
      3:Profit!

      Profits

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
  45. What you *should* be worried about.... by brunes69 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... is the more likely scenario - that, for every one of these incidents that are reported, there are 10 that are not.

    1. Re:What you *should* be worried about.... by gkitty · · Score: 1

      And worse, for every kind of incident that isn't reported, there are thousands just like it.

  46. Darik's Boot and Nuke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use
      It's free, and it works. There are several different types of disk wiping schemes.
    He has both a floppy and an iso version. :-)

  47. Mac OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Mac OS X has a secure disk formatting tool (and secure empty trash) included. I think its based on this . Its very, very slow but it would seem that it's almost impossible to recover the data after it is used.

  48. Guvernment by Kamiza+Ikioi · · Score: 1

    No doubt. Everyone in Canada knows it's Guvernment.

    --
    I8-D
  49. Those Australians are so laid back by Geancanach · · Score: 1

    This is the kind of thing that would make people in the U.S. very paranoid. A few years ago Americans were really worried about having their medical records stored electronically. It took a lot of convincing to make people understand that it was much better for them if doctors could easily access their medical history. People still aren't convinced, and so the whole online medical history access idea didn't really catch on.

    Is it just me, or does anyone else think that the situation in the article would have produced outrage if it happened in the U.S.?

    1. Re:Those Australians are so laid back by FullCircle · · Score: 1

      It's just you.

      Have you looked at the things that go on in the US?

      We don't get worked up about anything except "reality" TV, bare breasts or sports.

      If any nation was ever ready to be dictated, this bunch of lambs is it.

      --
      If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. - James Madison
    2. Re:Those Australians are so laid back by quanticle · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, I see a lot of credit card data being revealed to the world here. Personal info from universities and government sites has been repeatedly leaked.

      Where's the outcry?

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    3. Re:Those Australians are so laid back by jbbrwcky · · Score: 1

      Outrage? Sure. Just like CardSystems and it's 40 million snafoo. There was a big stink about it for a little while but after that, it died down. Has Congress done anything about it? No. Has Congress passed stringent laws protecting privacy since then? No.

      --
      Honi soit qui mal y pense.
  50. Darik's Boot and Nuke (fixed link) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use Darik's Boot and Nuke
      It's free, and it works. There are several different types of disk wiping schemes.
    He has both a floppy and an iso version. :-)

  51. for i in /dev/hd??;do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i;done by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1
    Replace hd with sd if you have scsi drives.
    Granted, that works on Linux, not AIX. It's been long enough since I admined AIX that I can't remember how to determine all partitions. More importantly, it probably wouldn't fit on the subject line (which was the purpose of this post).

    In any case, the point is it's still a (short) one-liner to clean the disks if you know the partition names. If those were Intel boxes, you could have booted off of Knoppix, and run the subject line. Even for RS/6000 boxes, it should be possible to find a Linux boot CD. That's really all you should need.

    And various people have free disk-erase boot CDs/floppies. What more do you really want? Stick in floppy, boot, go for lunch. Job done.

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  52. too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    too bad you suck in sports too !

  53. Aussie Doctors -SELL- PATIENT DATA to drug/mkt co. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      A recent Background Briefing program told the story.

      Patients don't even need to Opt-In... There's a sign - on the wall, in the waiting room, that
      suggests that the data is to be used for "Research"
      (the program made it sound like is was -marketing- research, NOT -medical- research!

      Still, the patients needed to Opt-OUT...!

  54. Please read DBAN FAQ by bersl2 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Q: Is the Gutmann method the best method?

    A: No.

    Most of the passes in the Gutmann wipe are designed to flip the bits in MFM/RLL encoded disks, which is an encoding that modern hard disks do not use.

    In a followup to his paper, Gutmann said that it is unnecessary to run those passes because you cannot be reasonably certain about how a modern hard disk stores data on the platter. If the encoding is unknown, then writing random patterns is your best strategy.

    In particular, Gutmann says that "in the time since this paper was published, some people have treated the 35-pass overwrite technique described in it more as a kind of voodoo incantation to banish evil spirits than the result of a technical analysis of drive encoding techniques. As a result, they advocate applying the voodoo to PRML and EPRML drives even though it will have no more effect than a simple scrubbing with random data... For any modern PRML/EPRML drive, a few passes of random scrubbing is the best you can do".


    In other words, DBAN doesn't work for modern hard drives. It's as good as random scrubbing. Which is not that effective anyway.

    1. Re:Please read DBAN FAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Wrong. Guttman recently posted to a bugtraq discussion about this. He stated that the density on modern drives is such that a few passes of pseudo-random data is perfectly adequate. Tracking information is less likely to be off on modern HDDs, which makes random passes just as adeqaute as the Guttman method was on older HDDs. So in short, modern HDDs are even easier to wipe than the older HDDs were.

    2. Re:Please read DBAN FAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Why the fuck was this modded as interesting? His conclusion is completely wrong.

      It's as good as random scrubbing. Which is not that effective anyway.

      That is complete bullshit. This guy obviously has not read Guttman's recent comments about this exact topic. Random (pseudo-random data) passes on new HDDs are more effective than the 35 passes Guttman suggested on older HDDs, because newer HDDs do not have the tracking misalignment problem that older drives had; they are more consistent. So, it's much easier and takes far less effort to overwrite data on newer drives, even if newer drives don't allow access to many lower level functions.

    3. Re:Please read DBAN FAQ by blincoln · · Score: 1

      That is complete bullshit. This guy obviously has not read Guttman's recent comments about this exact topic.

      In fact, to quote Guttman himself:

      "Looking at this from the other point of view, with the ever-increasing data density on disk platters and a corresponding reduction in feature size and use of exotic techniques to record data on the medium, it's unlikely that anything can be recovered from any recent drive except perhaps one or two levels via basic error-cancelling techniques. In particular the the drives in use at the time that this paper was originally written have mostly fallen out of use, so the methods that applied specifically to the older, lower-density technology don't apply any more. Conversely, with modern high-density drives, even if you've got 10KB of sensitive data on a drive and can't erase it with 100% certainty, the chances of an adversary being able to find the erased traces of that 10KB in 80GB of other erased traces are close to zero."

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    4. Re:Please read DBAN FAQ by dragonman97 · · Score: 1

      Not addressing the precise technical comments here (I think others have done a good job of that already), I'll add that I've run very thorough data recovery programs on drives that have been wiped with DBAN. Many hours of scanning turned up 0 usable bytes of data. I have a nice floppy disk sitting on my desk with red lettering "DANGER: DBAN HD Wipe Disk!" Very useful stuff.

  55. Re:Aussie Doctors -SELL- PATIENT DATA to drug/mkt by ivi · · Score: 1


      Oh, Background Briefing is a reputable
      current events radio program on the ABC's
      (domestic) Radio National network.

  56. SOME Aust. Gov't data is safe, so far... by ivi · · Score: 1


      Freedom of Information laws in Australia are VERY dim...

      A very recent (like this past week) Law Report
      (another fine radio program on the ABC's domestic
      Radio National network) covered an on-going case,
      in which The Australian newspaper (or was it another one?)
      has been seeking some non-controvertial info -
      from Treasury - that several years old and related to
      First Buyer's Grant (ie, for home buyers).

      In that case, the Treasurer used his ministerial powers to (simply) -declare- the sought-after documents "Subject to "

      It's up to the highest court in the land to decide
      whether - for such info, as was requested here -
      such ministerial "edicts" are to be deemed sufficient to keep files closed,
      ie, before a court has ruled.

      So, normally, gov't data - at least when thought
      capable of embarrassing the gov't - is quite confidential & very hard to acquire
      by those outside of gov't!

  57. Re:Reminds me of when I worked for US government.. by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    Funny, it was the opposite in the NASA division where I worked. My second level supervisor has a computer that was the oldest and slowest of the bunch - a 5-6 years old triple hand-me down with a 15" monitor. His secretary was one step better, maybe 4 years old, same monitor. My boss had a 17" monitor and a 2-3 year old ocmputer. The cad guys all sat in front of 21" monitors (this is early 90s, btw) on brand new intel processors - some dual ppros.

    Then again, we got real work done in that branch. (And it was the cad guys and working engineers closed their doors, turned off the lights and fragged the hell out of one another for an hour, instead of eating lunch on Fridays.)

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  58. Warranty policies by zotz · · Score: 1

    "Your task is even harder if you have a hard drive that ceased operating. There exists companies like http://www.kurt.hu/ [www.kurt.hu] that have state of the art technology to retrieve data from damaged hard drives. If you need your data: good for you. If you'd like to get rid of it for sure: better take good care of it..."

    Anyone else run into the situation where a drive dies during the warranty period and they want the old drive back when supplying the replacement... and the drive was in a laywers office where there is some thought of privilege between the clients and the firm? Or some similar situation like doctors, etc. (Hint - don't give up the old drive.)

    all the best,

    drew

    --
    FreeMusicPush If you want to see more Free Music made, listen to Free
    1. Re:Warranty policies by Michael+Hunt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Reminds me of an anecdote I heard a few years back. It's off-the-wall enough to be true, but I don't vouch for its accuracy. It was a pub conversation, after all.

      Co-worker at a previous job had an acquaintance who was working for a defense contractor (RLM, i think it was), on some crazy uber-classified Over-the Horizon Radar project. They used an absolute stackload of data in Compaq (ex DEC) SANs, I'm told.

      Due to the fact that all this data was classified at some level, and they were a good customer, Compaq gave them an unconditional replacement guarantee on the disks in their RAID arrays. If one failed, Compaq didn't want it back.

      So, this friend of a friend started sending in bogus RMA requests and taking the disks home. When this came to light, Compaq, obviously, were rather aggrieved. Since they couldn't do him for theft (the contract being rather ambiguous, and they HAD issued him with the RMAs,) they had the Australian Fed. Police arrest him for Treason.

      He got 5 to 10 years.

  59. *YAWN* by dentar · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Why, oh why, is this considered "news?"

    --
    -- I am. Therefore, I think!
  60. Australia Populated By Metrosexual Posers by lifespan · · Score: 0

    Yes, we have an informal class system here. For example, anyone with a brim on their hat wider than the tip of their nose should be held up to ridicule by city dwellers, unless a foreigner is around, then they should be emulated to make you appear more manly and less of a metrosexual girlyman (go arnie). ;) About the only classless place I've been to in Australia is the Crown Casino in Melbourne. You can get in there in trakky daks.

    --
    -- Howto: Get +5 (1) Whine about M$ (2) Namedrop Gentoo (3) Casually Abuse Mods (4) Namedrop Early Computer Model
  61. Never by N8F8 · · Score: 1

    Where I used to work for the government we would put a high power magnet on the HD and then pull out the discs and then smash them.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
  62. Amazing by rikkards · · Score: 1

    I am surprised that they don't sell them without the drives and woodchip them. That is what any sane organization does that wants to make sure this situation doesn't happen.

  63. Census is supposed to be head count only by militiaMan · · Score: 0

    Census is supposed to be head count only for a reason. Our founding fathers knew the dangers of the governemt keeping data on the people.

  64. Boot and Nuke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    It seems like alot of people here have no idea how to erase a hard drive. If you are worried about your personal data being recovered, reformatting doesn't cut it.

    A bit of info: when you delete a file from your computer, the file still remains on the hard drive. Your OS is simply deleting the reference to the file from the file table. Any amateur could easily recover the file, even after a FAT or NTFS formatting.

    The simplest way is Darik's Boot and Nuke, aka DBAN. The name says it all. Boot up DBAN, and it will nuke every hard drive it sees.

    There are other tools you can use, I am too lazy to look them up for you, but a quick search on sourceforge should yield you some file erasing tools. Many tools will offer you different levels of protection, all the way up to the standards that the Department of Defense uses.

  65. Re:Reminds me of when I worked for US government.. by lildogie · · Score: 1

    > we were authorized to give away outdated equipment to schools,
    > they made us do a multiple-pass low-level format on each
    > and every HDD that left the building.

    Maybe they were afraid of pr0n leaking into the schools from the upper-management PC's.

    And maybe that's what those high-end graphics cards were for.

  66. obligitory... by bad_outlook · · Score: 1

    all your bus (data) belong to us!

  67. Holidays vs. Vacation by sjb2016 · · Score: 1

    Actually, I think most American's would refer to a one off event as a "holiday" as well. We also take Mondays off if a national holiday falls on the weekend (at least government agencies do). Now, if it's Christmas time and you have a week off and you go somewhere fun and exciting it would be referred to as a vacation, but Christmas itself is called a holiday. Another example. Independence Day (July 4th) is a holiday that for most school children comes during their summer vacation as opposed to their summer holiday. Hope this clears things up.

    1. Re:Holidays vs. Vacation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, put simply, we in the U.S. refer to a scheduled day off work given to celebrate something as a "holiday". When we take an extended leave, often for purposes of travel, we call it a "vacation". Usually we'll get with friends and have barbecue and beer for the Independence Day holiday, and we'll take a cruise or travel to another country (or across our own) when we go on vacation.

  68. Blame the Govt for an individual's mistakes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do we always take potshots at Govt? Yes the buses & train systems have their problems but let's call a spade a spade. This is nothing more than a lazy sysadmin & his/her lazy boss not doing their respective jobs properly. Too often I see IT staff taking the easy way out rather than Doing Their Jobs Properly. Yes sometimes its crap work but you have to take the good with the bad. Thank goodness that for every useless sysadmin there are 2 great ones carrying him! The real tragedy here is that the manager will probably "spin" the situation making him look good for firing/disciplining a subordinate...

  69. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  70. NASA by VeganBob · · Score: 1

    ...is still running AIX operationally in mission-critical areas. In the middle of switching to RedHat.

    --
    Being funny is my sig nature.
  71. dont jump to.. by dotpavan · · Score: 1

    conclusions, the govt. was only testing the computer literacy of Aussies, and chking if they were ethical enough to mention about the mistake..

  72. Re:for i in /dev/hd??;do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i;don by smash · · Score: 1
    Not quite that simple.

    Data can be retrieved from drives for at least a couple of generations, if you have the tools.

    I recall sending a dead drive off for data recovery, and the company (Disk Doctor, in western australia) calling me back and asking "which o/s do you want?". Apparently they were able to see at least 3 different O/S installations on the disk...

    To be sure, you need to write crap over the disk several times...

    smash.

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  73. LART by plopez · · Score: 1

    If it was me there was a perfectly good 200 ton hydraulic press that could have been used in the same place, a small heat treatment furnace to get all the data off that drive by going beyond the curie temperature, a large array of machine tools and an impact testing rig.

    Shouldn't you save that for situations that really require it? I.e. dealing with LUSERS? :)

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  74. Re:Reminds me of when I worked for US government.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    City gov't != US gov't

  75. Just don't sell disks, stupid ... by un1xl0ser · · Score: 1

    If you are concerned about the data on your drives, then you shouldn't let them be used again, ever.

    There are way to many processes for gaps to occur. Your techs could forget to wipe a drive, or a drive could fail, and not show up at all.

    Never let drives out of your premesis, if there ever was any data on then that you are concerned about getting into the wrong hands. Degauss them at least, then store them. Look into shredding solutions where the drives wouldn't be usable at all.

    It really depends on what kind of data you are storing, but in the case of US export controlled data, even reporting exposure of the data to a foreign party could cost millions of dollars in fines alone. That doesn't even get into how much the IP or data was worth, and how much time you have to spend correcting the session.

    Wu-Tang said it best. Protect your neck.

    --
    v4sw6PU$hw6ln6pr4F$ck 4/6$ma3+6u7LNS$w2m4l7U$i2e4+7en6a2X h
  76. ebay is great for this... by bani · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You could probably make a living selling data snarfed from used disks/tapes off ebay.

    I picked up some "blank" used DLT tapes from ebay. These "blanks" contained a filesystem backup for the online store of a multibillion dollar corporation.

    Why get so worried about personal data being stolen by l337 h4x0rz through the intarweb? All they need to do is buy a bunch of used media off ebay -- much easier.

  77. Re:Reminds me of when I worked for US government.. by HardCase · · Score: 1

    I used to work for city government here in SoCal, USA.

    Which city in Southern California does the US government run?

    -h-

  78. Re:for i in /dev/hd??;do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i;don by LocalH · · Score: 1

    Um, that's not secure in the least. Change /dev/zero to /dev/urandom and do it about 6 or 7 times consecutively to securely wipe your drives (and it should be sufficient to do just hdx without worrying about the partition number).

    --
    FC Closer
  79. In Canada... by myov · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One of the major banks decomissioned servers which eventually wound up on ebay. The person who bought them discovered that all data was still intact.

    --
    I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
  80. CS 101 by norm_z · · Score: 1

    Why is there 2 pop cans in the computer lab? Do you know better never bring drinks into labs? Maybe you should take CS 101 instead Security 101?

  81. Mod Parent Up (n/t) by elliam · · Score: 0

    You'll never see this anyhow. Why did you click?

    Seriously, putt a little thought into what is actually required to read data off of a hard drive that has been Properly overwritten. The parent's link makes the point that not only would the new random data obscure the deleted files, but the files written previously would do the same. If you're going to infer previous drive contents based on slight shifts in the magnetics of the drive, you have to realize that every use of the drive in the past has created the same shifts. Obviously there are areas that are more used than others but I would be perfectly happy with one complete overwrite of a drive that I'd been using for a few years previously.

    Think of it this way: You can certainly track someone across a beach that few people have walked across, but if you expect that you can track me across Venice Beach a week after I go for a swim, you're nuts.

    --
    http://www.andashdesigns.com/
  82. They're not the only ones who forgot to wipe first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Heck, this $20 PC I just bought wasn't wiped either. It still had Windows 2000 on it, and it's very easy to find the name of the company that previously owned it, along with names of people who had logged into it. It even has Office on it, making it worth the purchase.

    Anyway, I always remember to uh, wipe first. Yeah.

  83. I went to a course on IT security sponsored by multiplexo · · Score: 2, Informative
    by DISCO, the Defense Indusrial Security Clearance Office or (yes, they are referred to as "DISCO", yes it is an incredibly contrived acronym, no I am not making this up) and one of the things the instructor discussed was a case where the Department of Justice had surplussed some PCs to various local law enforcement agenties back in the late 1980s. The PCs had not been wiped and a tech savvy cop in Virginia started going through one of them and lo and behold he found the DoJs witness protection program list, unencrypted, just waiting there for sale to the highest bidder.

    Fortunately he was an honest man and didn't sell the list, rather he contacted the DoJ and DoJ contacted DISCO to help get their shit together. The instructor was making the point that when you surplus equipment that you really need to make sure that you wipe the drives and any other storage media. His bias was that the easiest way to do this was to physically remove and destroy the media because you could never really be sure if a wipe program had worked (well you could go over the drive to make sure that it had been erased, but who's going to do this?).

    When I don't want to physically destroy a drive but want to make sure that it's gone I either wipe it with a low-level hardware format utility such as the one built into Adaptec SCSI cards, or I use a program such as autoclave by Josh Larios (which he isn't supporting any more outside of the University of Washington community) although now I guess I'll have to try the recommended replacement Darik's Boot and Nuke. A side benefit of programs such as this one is that they really exercise the Hell out of your disks, which is great to smoke out any potential failures.

    --
    cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
  84. Happens in the US too by Hydian · · Score: 1

    I dunno if it is still the case, but the US federal government used to sell off scrap systems by the palette via a warehouse. We purchased some stuff through a junkyard that bought truckloads of them and the systems still had everything on them. Even worse, this junkyard sold off a palette of laptops that previously belonged to the US Army to a guy who was shipping them back to china. I'd guess that they weren't all wiped either though I didn't get an opportunity to look for myself.

  85. how does this not make sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem might have been the beach reference. He didn't speak to the crowd. To fill you in: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venice_Beach

  86. It varies by xixax · · Score: 1

    We we turfed our old storage system, arranging a recognised "Certificate of Desttruction" was mandatory before I could let the disks and tapes out of the building. OTOH, most of government ICT is now outsourced here in Australia, so maybe the provider was cutting corners.

    The agencies that handle lots of personal or sensitive data (the tax office, Medicare, Statistics, Defence etc.) have much stronger policies. For example, surplus PCs from these groups will be sold without drives. Lower risk areas can just scrib drives if there is a low risk of sensitive information being on the HD.

    Xix.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
  87. Re:Possibly the best reason to encrypt data from d by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

    ice pick + 12M HCl

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  88. It's also absolutely worthless by b00m3rang · · Score: 1

    Do that, and anyone can recover 100% of the data on that drive using any data recovery tool. People have been known to buy used PCs and hard drives specifically for the purpose of data mining. The drive needs to be overwritten with random data, preferably multiple times.

    I just use them 'till they die, then destroy the platters.

  89. Re:Reminds me of when I worked for US government.. by Shanep · · Score: 1

    I used to work for city government here in SoCal, USA. In contrast to our Aussie friends, they were super paranoid about data leakage.

    This does not, in any way, reflect on "Aussies" or their awareness of the importance of media sanitization.

    When there was actually a situation where the red tape was momentarily pierced and we were authorized to give away outdated equipment to schools, they made us do a multiple-pass low-level format on each and every HDD that left the building.

    Are you sure you were "low level" formatting those drives? That is a term that gets used often when it should not. Modern IDE drives cannot be low level formatted outside the factory and this has been the case for many years. A true low level format actually re-writes tracks, aligning them again as it goes.

    "all modern hard disks are low-level formatted at the factory for the life of the drive. There's no way for the PC to do an LLF on a modern IDE/ATA or SCSI hard disk, and there's no reason to try to do so."

    Unfortunately, this term has become so misused, that even hard drive manufacturers are now providing zero-fill utilities labeled as low-level-format utilities.

    I have worked for the Australian Government in sanitizing machines prior to them being decommisioned. Luckily, I am a contractor who takes his contracts, customers and their needs seriously and I did not have anything to do with this case. I don't think this reflects on Australia in any way. I'm sure I could dig up similar stories regarding US or UK blunders.

    --
    War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
  90. Re:Reminds me of when I worked for US government.. by Anti-Trend · · Score: 1
    There's no need to be defensive, I like and respect Australia very much. My intention was to cantrast this particular incident, not the practices of Australia in general, with the practices of the city I worked for. To clarify what I meant by 'low-level format', I was referring to a multi-layer random hashing by some NSA-approved software. The data would not be impossible to recover, given unlimited resources, but it wouldn't be a cakewalk either. The really "important" stuff was carted off and destroyed at some special shredding facility. Anyway, like I said, none of the information on those systems was particularly sensitive anyway.

    -AT

    --
    Working in a DevOps shop is like playing in a band made up entirely of keytarists.
  91. Re:Reminds me of when I worked for US government.. by Shanep · · Score: 1

    I can see how what I wrote might seem to have come off as defensive, but really I just wanted to make sure people don't think this is typical of us or even our government.

    --
    War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
  92. Re:for i in /dev/hd??;do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i;don by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1
    Yeah, I realize that it's not the most secure method, but I was trying to get it to fit on the subject line, and I was running out of characters.

    Nontheless, it's far better than just shipping the drive out the door without doing anything, and it'll at least deter the casual purchaser who wants to know if anybody left something on the (( Presumably anonymous )) drives they bought. if you're expecting that somebody is going to want to read the data on the drives,

    If you've got really important stuff on the drive, then yes, you should (1) read from /dev/urandom, and (2), put it in an infinite loop and let it run for a few days.
    The extra electricity will cost you a full $0.20 and save a lot of headache.

    while echo pass $(( ++i )) ; do date
    for i in /dev/hd??;do
    dd if=/dev/urandom of=$i
    done
    done
    happy now?
    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  93. Not trivial but not impossible either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I have no idea if that company really offers that service (probably not), but I find Feenberg's article that claims it is overwrought, to be overwrought.
    • He chides Gutmann for not providing verifiable cites on intelligence agency capabilities. Well, duh!
    • He quotes Sobey's paper to give the impression that MFM scanning is impracticable. But Sobey was specifically looking at MFM as a commercial tool for recovery of an entire disk. He made no comment as to its feasibility for recovering specific files of high value. In fact, he acknowledges that the method most certainly can read through one overwrite, he doesn't comment on deeper overwrites, and he guesstimates a recovery rate that works out to about 5 MB/hour. So, we could recover the FAT and root directory table (taking at most a few hours), figure out where to find the file we want, move to that location (using existing servo marks, which aren't overwritten) and then recover that one file at 5 MB/hr. Hardly infeasible at all. If that recovered file is a list of undercover cops' cover names, 30 bytes could get a man killed.
    • Worse, Feenberg doesn't point out that in the very next section, Sobey notes that it has already been demonstrated (in an open journal, 5 years ago) that this process can be sped up to magnetically image an entire disk in a few hours!
    • Finally, Feenberg fails totally in his attempt to explain away the fact that some government standards mandate destruction of the platters. In fact, his explanation suggests that he hasn't actually read the relevant document (which is publicly available). Specifically: ``The technician tasked with discarding a hard drive may or may not have enough computer knowledge to know if running the command "urandom >/dev/sda2c1" has covered an entire disk with random data, or only one partition, nor is it easy to confirm that it was done.'' In fact for the CONFIDENTIAL data to which Feenberg is here referring, this is exactly what the technician is expected to do, except that the standard also mandates 3 overwrites, of which the 2nd must be the negation of the first. It also does specify a verification phase. ``How would you confirm that the overwrite was not pseudo-random?'' There is no requirement for the random data to be truly random. ``Smashing the drive with a sledgehammer is easy to do, easy to confirm, and very hard to get wrong.'' It also is not an approved destruction method. Degaussing and physical destruction are the two approved methods for sanitising a TOP SECRET disk, and the approved types of physical destruction include pulverisation. But pulverisation doesn't mean a few whacks with a sledgehammer, it means it in the original Latin sense, pulveris, "dust".

    There is little doubt that a single overwrite with zeroes (or whatever) is enough to totally stymie anyone who isn't prepared to shell out a swodge of cash to use special hardware. There is considerable uncertainty about just how much cash is required to achieve particular results, but there is, again, widespread agreement that whatever can be achieved, each additional random overwrite makes it much harder to do (probably exponentially so). And multiple cryptographic overwrites are pretty cheap, so why not do them and be safe. True, doing a whole modern disk is slow enough to be rather tedious if you sit there watching it; so don't do that! Leave it running overnight instead.

    In case anyone is interested, here is what we did when I worked in the IT section of a small police department. We created a bootable DOS floppy image, which had on it a batch file, and a low level disc overwriter. We made a couple of dozen of these. The floppies were labelled with a skull-and-crossbones. When a machine was booted with this floppy, it gave a last chance to back out, issued "format /u" to unmark bad sectors (so the overwriter would try to write to them, and maybe succeed once or twice), and did multiple cryptographicly random overwrites until told to stop. When a ba

    1. Re:Not trivial but not impossible either by hankwang · · Score: 1
      First, I am not convinced that the thing -even theoretically- works on modern hard disks (but then, I am a physicist, not a hard disk engineer). A bit, zero or one, consists of only a small number of magnetic grains, although I'm not sure how many. That means that the magnetic signal on a scale from 0.0 to 1.0 is quantized, with a step size dependent of how many magnetic grains you happen to have at that location. The reason that harddisks get more and more capacity over the years is partially because the grains are getting smaller such that you can reliably distinguish a one from a zero if you pack more bits on a unit surface. (The other reason is probably the quality of the read/write heads and servoes). It means that the ghosts of earlier data are overwhelmed by the intrinsic noise in the magnetic signal.

      Second, if you assume that the theory behind recovery of overwritten data is correct, then it doesn't matter whether you overwrite with random data or not. You know the data that is currently "on top". According to the theory, it is always possible to fully recover the data one layer deep. So whether the two top layers of data are cryptographically random does not matter. And so on. The only thing that matters is that all bits are flipped between one and zero a couple of times, which is not trivial given the fact that 1s and 0s in the data do not correspond directly to the magnetisation (see the documentation of the shred utility).

      Third, to recover a file you have to know where it is, so first recover the root directory, then the file allocation table or inodes of the subdirectories and so on until you have found the file. If you can recover a bit with 99% certainty (which I find rather optimistic), then the probability of correctly recovering a 32-bit sector/block number is only 72%. And you have to do that for every subdirectory, and for the blocks over which the file is spread out. I think you see the point I'm trying to make.

    2. Re:Not trivial but not impossible either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "First, I am not convinced that the thing -even theoretically- works on modern hard disks"

      As I mentioned, Sobey's article (linked from Feenberg's) cites a peer reviewed 2000 publication which demonstrates that it does. To me, this is like the Deepcrack crack of DES; to me it was clear that it was going to work, but having an actual demonstration simplifies the arguments.

      "According to the theory, it is always possible to fully recover the data one layer deep"

      Ah no, there's the rub. I don't think anyone would seriously claim that even one layer deep is going to be 100% reliable; as you say, this is a noisy process, and by chance some bits will just have too much noise. Suppose we have a layer of original data (call it 2), and two layers of overwrites (0 & 1). We may take it that we know layer 0 essentially perfectly, if the drive is readable. Now by the various tricks we derive the sequence of layer 1 with some success rate, say (for argument) 80% per bit. If layer 1 is some simple fixed pattern (say, a constant but unknown byte) then by simple bitwise majority verdict after recovering just 40 bytes we will be 99.99% certain of the value of the masking byte, and every additional bit position recovered will improve that certainty. Conversely, if the pattern is CSPRN, then no matter how much is recovered, we will only ever by 80% sure of the value. The question is, when we go to recover a bit from layer 2, will our success rate be better if we know the layer 1 bit with certainty, as against 80% accuracy? Given the way the hysteresis works, I strongly suspect it will. Thus, using an unpredictable sequence makes no difference for a single overwrite, but probably makes going deeper much harder. At any rate, it doesn't hurt; on a modern PC, you can generate a CSPRNG sequence much faster than you can write it to disk.

      "The only thing that matters is that all bits are flipped between one and zero a couple of times, which is not trivial given the fact that 1s and 0s in the data do not correspond directly to the magnetisation (see the documentation of the shred utility)."

      Quite so. Yet another reason to use a pseudorandom sequence is that it is likely to fail more gracefully in the face of unexpected disk behaviour. For example, Peter Gutmann's infamous 35 overwrites (used in shred) was an attempt to come up with patterns such that regardless of the type of munging done by the disk controller, at least a few overwrites were guaranteed to actually achieve, on the disk, the basic DOD requirements. However every time a new type of disk comes out you would have to check yet again that the system works. In contrast, several random writes are ~likely~ to achieve the requirement, and do so just as well (or badly) regardless of the type of disk; consequently Gutmann's patterns begin and end with a few random layers.

      "If you can recover a bit with 99% certainty (which I find rather optimistic), then the probability of correctly recovering a 32-bit sector/block number is only 72%. And you have to do that for every subdirectory, and for the blocks over which the file is spread out. I think you see the point I'm trying to make."

      I do see what you mean, and it certainly is a problem to consider, but I don't think it is quite as bad as you hope. Now, I agree that raw recovery rates may be pretty bad, perhaps much worse than 99%. Actually, I don't have any hard data on recovered error rates, but I guesstimated it from a) assuming an AGWN error model; b) known error rates (before ECC decoding) for regular disk reads; and c) Gutmann's claim that hysteresis puts a shifted bit about 5% above or below the "perfect" level. From these factors, I estimate a single overwrite recovered error rate of 7%! However as discussed previously, the bit pattern actually written to the disk is significantly munged from the raw data you send to the controller, and on modern disks quite a bit of that munging consists of error correcting codes (usually Reed-Solomon). Thus you can misread quite a few bits and stil

    3. Re:Not trivial but not impossible either by hankwang · · Score: 1
      Interesting thoughts. As I said, I'm not a hard disk engineer and you do actually seem to have a thorough background. The only thing that still keeps me skeptic is that I haven't heard of a company that states clearly that they can recover overwritten bytes of data, which would seem to be a very good selling point: "Other companies can only recover deleted files as long as the space formerly occupied by the file is not yet overwritten. However, we have Whizbang technology that allows us to recover data that is physically overwritten up to two times. Contact us for pricing."

      By the way, why do you post anonymously? Many readers won't see your comments due to the low score of anonymous posts.

    4. Re:Not trivial but not impossible either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "By the way, why do you post anonymously?"


      Laziness and impatience. (But lacking a bit in hubris this morning.)

  94. G.u.l.l.i.b.l.e is you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice to know you are gullible enough to believe a story about this.

    When you buy a clue or two, you will realise that the data "shown" on the website is actually quite useless and doesn't affect anything at all.

  95. Seems the page has vanished into the ether... by www.philpem.me.uk · · Score: 1

    Click the link and you land on the guy's homepage. Click through to "News" from there and under "Data Security 101" is the message: What you seek is no longer here, it was once but is not anymore. Soo... Did anyone save a copy?

  96. Not me personally, no. by Hyperhaplo · · Score: 0
    --
    You have a sick, twisted mind. Please subscribe me to your newsletter.