Slashdot Mirror


Zotob and Mytob Worm Authors Arrested

An anonymous reader writes "The Washingtonpost.com is reporting that two men have been arrested for allegedly authoring and releasing the "Zotob" and "Mytob" worms. The first Zotob, released Aug 14 - just 4 days after Microsoft released a fix for the hole it exploited, infected systems at many major news outlets. Mytob remains one of the most pervasive worms on the 'Net today." From the article: "Moroccan authorities, working with the FBI, arrested Farid Essebar, 18, a Moroccan national born in Russia who went by the screen moniker 'Diabl0.' Arrested in Turkey was Atilla Ekici, aka 'Coder,' age 21. Both individuals will be subject to local prosecutions, the FBI said." Update: 08/26 20:56 GMT by Z : Nana Mous wrote to mention an eWeek blow by blow account of Microsoft's response to the worm. Very interesting read.

363 comments

  1. Informative link: by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 4, Informative

    In the interest of stimulating more informed discussion, here is a link to a press release from Microsoft commending the Turkish and Moroccan authorities, as well as the FBI, for their prompt arrest of the suspects.

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:Informative link: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      in morroco if they ctch you hcking they will cut your pinkies off, it mkes cpitliztion rel bitch. trust me i know

    2. Re:Informative link: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very clever but you screwed it up. P and Z are pinky letters.

    3. Re:Informative link: by bluekanoodle · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not on Moroccan keyboards. :)

    4. Re:Informative link: by Gunny101 · · Score: 1

      All bow to lord Zotob and master Mytob!

    5. Re:Informative link: by uncoveror · · Score: 1

      So, they are going to publicly sacrifice some scapegoats to try to maintain the illusion that it was a virus? Typical microshaft!

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    6. Re:Informative link: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christ!!! No wonder people think the Linux zealots are a bunch of freaking retards. It's because they are!

  2. With a name like... by zetes · · Score: 5, Funny

    Atilla, you don't need a cool alias - you already have one!

    --
    2+2=5 for extremely large values of 2
    1. Re:With a name like... by saskboy · · Score: 1

      And who'd have thunk it, after all these years, Atilla the Hun is still causing problems for humanity.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    2. Re:With a name like... by Sabaki · · Score: 1

      Maybe that's why he picked kind of a dull alias, for balance.

    3. Re:With a name like... by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1

      Wow, i would never have though i'd be proud to be a hungarian on /. ;)

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    4. Re:With a name like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, for large values of 2, 2+2 = 6, not 5

    5. Re:With a name like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problems for humanity? Talk about the crusades!

    6. Re:With a name like... by LowbrowDeluxe · · Score: 1

      Reading through the replies, I see a lot of making fun of these guys screen names, but not a lot of mention of the fact that the media felt the need to include that info.

      I mean, really, WTF? I don't know about the rest of you, but I've got a good half-dozen or so current screen names for various uses. All I can possibly see in that little tidbit of flavor text is the usual media 'all haxxors are evil and use wierd techno-jargon that real human beings can't understand, and strange code-names just like terrorists'. Giving the public their 'screen name' is just...pointless, except perhaps to help perpetuate an image of pasty-skinned teens sitting in dark basements. Which may or may not be true, it just strikes me as disturbing.

    7. Re:With a name like... by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      Sabaki,
      you would be wise not to call anything a guy named Atilla does dull.

      Don't ask how I know.
      I hide my Fu-Manchu in shame.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    8. Re:With a name like... by kaens · · Score: 1

      $2=2.5

    9. Re:With a name like... by zetes · · Score: 1

      You have a good point. If I could mod your comment up I would. I guess the movie Hackers may have glorified the act of creating a clever alias, to the point of stereotyping IT professionals or deviants (or hackers more specifically). Maybe we should all start choosing aliases that are just different names. "In today's news, Bob Sanders, also known as JimSmith online, was arrested for writing the code for the Ebola.C virus." That would teach em!

      Z

      --
      2+2=5 for extremely large values of 2
  3. This was the proper response. by dthrall · · Score: 1, Redundant

    What more is there to say? These were created after the patches were released to fix vulnerabilities. This was malicious code that's intention was to exploit a recognized bug before everyone had the chance to apply the patch.

    1. Re:This was the proper response. by coolGuyZak · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe it's just me, but /. should really think about implementing a "crime" section for posts such as this... I don't believe that the arrest of a virus creator really falls within the realm of "Your Rights Online"...

    2. Re:This was the proper response. by MightyMartian · · Score: 1
      No matter how many categories are created, some stories will always lie at the boundary of a category. The question is not whether the post has anything to do precisely with YOUR RIGHTS, and that too, ONLINE. The questin should simply be: which category is closest to the topic of the story.

      You mean this isn't a Mac topic?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:This was the proper response. by nacturation · · Score: 1

      You mean this isn't a Mac topic?

      Actually, it is.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    4. Re:This was the proper response. by wasted+time · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Slashdot has sections? I thought they just had horrible taste in color schemes and goofy icons.

      --
      The Stone Age did not end because humans ran out of stones. - William McDonough
    5. Re:This was the proper response. by coolGuyZak · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Then I would say it doesn't belong in YRO at all. Remove it entirely from this section. It doesn't have anything to do with "rights", as far as I am concerned. IT has to do with 2 dumbasses creating a worm and releasing it into the wild, with solely malevolent intent.

      Heh. This will be seen as a flame... but I am of the opinion that these two should be tracked down and punished... IE. Their rights wern't being harmed when they were arrested, nor was there a "triumph" of personal rights over the government.

      YRO should be reserved for real discussions of rights, not bullshit stories that explain the arrest of virii creators. My problem is not that it is on a boundary--it doesn't fit at all.

    6. Re:This was the proper response. by EddieBurkett · · Score: 1

      Well, if the category is about a discussion of Your Rights Online, does that also mean you can't discuss what you aren't allowed to do online, like write viruses, and the resulting consequences of such actions? I'll admit, this isn't a great category heading, but as pointed out, where else does it fit?

      --
      The only thing I hate more than hypocrites are people who hate hypocrites.
  4. Punishment? Right... by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Both individuals will be subject to local prosecutions, the FBI said.

    In other words, a few horse heads will show up in some beds, some vague threats made, and they'll get off with no punishment.

    --
    There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
    1. Re:Punishment? Right... by the_rev_matt · · Score: 1

      You must be unfamiliar with legal systems in third world countries. Execution is a very real possibility. Severe beatings and years in a miserable prison are likely.

      --
      this is getting old and so are you

      blog

    2. Re:Punishment? Right... by diskis · · Score: 1, Troll

      Somehow I think that's not limited to third world countries only...

    3. Re:Punishment? Right... by badasscat · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      In other words, a few horse heads will show up in some beds, some vague threats made, and they'll get off with no punishment.

      (As Captain Oveur:) "Joey, have you ever been to a Turkish prison?"

    4. Re:Punishment? Right... by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > You must be unfamiliar with legal systems in third world countries. Execution is a very real possibility. Severe beatings and years in a miserable prison are likely.

      Worm/virus authors are one notch above spammers. (They're only one notch above spammers because, unlike spam, I've never been hit with one.)

      In other words - you're making the original poster's point. Spending their time locked into a cell with nothing but a bucket of their own feces for dinner, beaten regularly, and after a few months to a few years, finally having their limbs or heads hacked off with a rusty blade (or having their lungs blasted out through their back by means of a hail of automatic weapon fire), they'll get only a fraction of the punishment they deserve.

    5. Re:Punishment? Right... by OneSeventeen · · Score: 0, Troll

      How about releasing their address and calling off their local governments?

      Or just let everyone install open source software and stop wining about surprises that come in closed source software.

      --
      "Now the trouble about trying to make yourself stupider than you really are is that you very often succeed." -C.S. Lewis
    6. Re:Punishment? Right... by Taladar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Spam is worse than Viruses and Worms. You can't escape it by using another OS.

    7. Re:Punishment? Right... by KillShill · · Score: 0, Troll

      no you're thinking about western punishment. in the east, they'll treat you like a criminal, not give the prison industry a financial boost.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    8. Re:Punishment? Right... by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      "Severe beatings and years in a miserable prison are likely."

      And that's just waiting for your trial!

    9. Re:Punishment? Right... by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      After watching "Midnight Express" I think most people would prefer US prisons.

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    10. Re:Punishment? Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in a "third world country" and I know that this kind crime are not covered in many penal codes . So I think that these boys will go free. Perhaps with some minor punishment to make the "Big Brother" happy.

  5. Re:Young by L.+VeGas · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know how it is. When you're young, it's hard to keep your worm to yourself.

  6. Re:Young by HTTP+Error+403+403.9 · · Score: 1, Troll

    Very intelligent kids with no social values, must be homeschooled.

    --
    I'm not a Troll, it's reverse psychology.
  7. i always wondered by tont0r · · Score: 4, Funny

    what would someone that age get out of releasing something that would cost so much damage?? i realize you get the whole '3Y3 PWN3D J00R 4SS' effect, but still.

    and also, i guess this shows more than russia has some awesome programmers :)

    last tid bit:
    Moroccan authorities, working with the FBI, arrested Farid Essebar, 18, a Moroccan national born in Russia who went by the screen moniker "Diabl0."
    who the hell uses the term 'screen moniker'??

    1. Re:i always wondered by tundog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      and also, i guess this shows more than russia has some awesome programmers :)

      Creating these viruses is easy. It takes a lot more skill to create a complex system than it does to find a crack in the foundation and exploit it. All that this really shows is that Russia has some 'unconscionable' programmers.

      --
      All your base are belong to us!
    2. Re:i always wondered by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 2, Insightful

      i guess this shows more than russia has some awesome programmers

      What, specifically, in the "code" of these viruses constitutes the "awesome" part?

    3. Re:i always wondered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It takes a lot more skill to create a complex system than it does to find a crack in the foundation and exploit it.

      No, it doesn't take much skill to create garbage software like Windows, and as a result, it doesn't take much skill to create these viruses either.

      Ask yourself this: if the folks at Microsoft are so "skilled", why didn't they just leave these holes out in the first place, so no patch is necessary? Once pointed out, probably by someone outside of Microsoft, they seemed to have no problem fixing them.

      Sounds like incompetence to me.

      I don't want software by EITHER party on my computer.

    4. Re:i always wondered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, people are just too poor to do anything else with their time.

    5. Re:i always wondered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Creating these viruses is easy. It takes a lot more skill to create a complex system than it does to find a crack in the foundation and exploit it. All that this really shows is that Russia has some 'unconscionable' programmers.

      On the contrary, creating complex systems is very easy, just start with some simple induction rules and let chaos theory create the system for you. Take mathematics for instance. It's a few simple axioms that generate a tremendously large and complex system. Not only that, but it took over three thousand years for Church and Turing to find the onecrack in mathematics and come up with the incompleteness theorem. I'd say that finding the cracks and edge cases is far more difficult than building the system in the first place. After all, look how (relatively) easy it was to launch things into space, but difficult to determine why the Challenger blew up, or how hard it would have been to find that crack and fix it beforehand.

    6. Re:i always wondered by mhearne · · Score: 1

      "Creating these viruses is easy..."

      It's easier to download them off a crack site, then tailor them to fit your own needs. If these morons had the education to create this stuff themselves, they would be *working* and making too much money to get into mischief.

      Michael

  8. Coder?? by wasted+time · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wouldn't using Atilla as a screen name earn a bit more respect than Coder?

    http://www.hyperhistory.net/apwh/bios/b3atilla_p1d z.htm

    --
    The Stone Age did not end because humans ran out of stones. - William McDonough
    1. Re:Coder?? by illcare · · Score: 1

      Although it is not a very common name, "Atilla" is a regular name in Turkish. Using it as a nickname in Turkey would be similar to using "Steve" as a nick in the US.

    2. Re:Coder?? by arkanes · · Score: 1

      I think a Turkish coder using "Steve" as his nick would be totally awesome.

    3. Re:Coder?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but he was really going for "Cooter" because of the "Dukes of Hazard" nostalgia involved.

      "I may be Crazy, but I ain't dumb. Crazy Cooter talkin' at ya"

  9. Fitting Punishment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    removing their virii and others as well as great software such as CoolWebSearch and their ilk all day EVERYDAY of their sentence.

    1. Re:Fitting Punishment... by therealking · · Score: 1

      Make them clean WintoolsA!

      --
      Gadget News at Gizmo.com
    2. Re:Fitting Punishment... by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 2, Interesting

      removing their virii and others as well as great software such as CoolWebSearch and their ilk all day EVERYDAY of their sentence.

      Too lenient. How about they get wired up to some slashdot server and are delivered a slight electric shock every time some idiot writes "virii?" Two shots for "cracker" every time it is not used in the context of edible wafers.

      Now, THAT's script-kiddie rehab!

    3. Re:Fitting Punishment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More to the point would be a lifetime ban on computer use. When a person shoots some one you don't punish them by taking away firearm priveledges for six months. When some one is guilty of stock fraud they take away rights to trade in stock. A lawyer breaks the rules he is disbarred. Make the punishment fit the crime. It might make these guys think twice if they think they might loose access to computers for life. At 21 that's a scary sentence for a computer user. These guys do a lot of damage and cost millions. When a killer gets out of jail you don't hand him a gun and say don't kill so many this time. It's not the same crime but the analogy fits. If they were counterfitters what would your reaction be if their first act after getting out of jail was to buy a computer, a scanner and a high end printer? No the 5 gallons of bleach and $500 in new $1 bills isn't the least bit suspicous. Keep the tools away from the criminals. At least make it harder for them. They don't let child molesters live next to schools for a reason.

    4. Re:Fitting Punishment... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Too lenient. How about they get wired up to some slashdot server and are delivered a slight electric shock every time some idiot writes "virii?" Two shots for "cracker" every time it is not used in the context of edible wafers.

      How many shocks for "CowboyNeil"?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    5. Re:Fitting Punishment... by Stiletto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wonder what would be a fitting punishment for someone who uses the nonsense word "virii"

      THERE IS NO SUCH WORD AS VIRII.
      THERE IS NO SUCH WORD AS VIRII.
      THERE IS NO SUCH WORD AS VIRII.

      Keep reading it, and try to let it sink in.

    6. Re:Fitting Punishment... by serutan · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they will be tried in Morocco or Turkey, and whether either country will demonstrate the "ChopYour" and "HandsOff" worms on them.

    7. Re:Fitting Punishment... by spewey · · Score: 1
      THERE IS NO SUCH WORD AS VIRII...

      ...in English.

      It's a perfectly acceptable Latin word. Vir, or "Man," is properly pluralized as Virii, or "Men."

      It's pronounced "veery," like the bird. However, to pronounce it "vie-rye" and assume it is the pluralization of "virus" (for which the Romans had no real concept) is not only pretentious but totally incorrect.

    8. Re:Fitting Punishment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...in English."

      This isn't VaticanDot, we speak English here.

      "...not only pretentious but totally incorrect."
      >>>Cough,Cough May no virii infect your boxen.

    9. Re:Fitting Punishment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a perfectly acceptable Latin word. Vir, or "Man," is properly pluralized as Virii, or "Men."

      No. The plural of vir is viri. One "i."

      But Latin does have the word virus, meaning "poison" or "slime." It's a rare second declension neuter ending in -us (usually you only see neuter -us words in the third declension). Because the gender of virus is neuter, the proper plural is: vira .

  10. Morocco and Turkey? Bleh by bl968 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If I was either of the two suspects I would be crying my eyes out and demanding to be tried and jailed in the US instead of the "Local prosecution". Their best jails would likely not come up to the level of our worst.

    --
    "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 51230 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; Setec Astronomy)"
    1. Re:Morocco and Turkey? Bleh by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 2, Funny

      Joey, have you ever been in a Turkish prison?

    2. Re:Morocco and Turkey? Bleh by shawnce · · Score: 1

      No but I have seen a grown man naked.

      (in the mirror, that is scary enough)

    3. Re:Morocco and Turkey? Bleh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > Their best jails would likely not come up to the level of our worst.

      Welcome in Guantanamo !

    4. Re:Morocco and Turkey? Bleh by WiFiBro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not sure what information you are basing that on, could you clarify? I know ./ers will accuse me of anti-americanism but you are just assuming.
      According to a quick Google on the (ever reliable) internet, there are political prisoners in the US, there is torture going on (not only Abu Graib and Guantanamo, see http://www.historiansagainstwar.org/resources/tort ure/brucefranklin.html ) and there are also doubts on whether you can get a fair trial: it's often advised to expelled suspects that in their own interest it would be better to plea guilty to get a lower sentence than plea innocent, even if they are/would be innocent.

      Anyway these wormcreators are likely to be made 'an example' in any country.

    5. Re:Morocco and Turkey? Bleh by Khalid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well moroccan prisons are certainly not five stars hotels, but I am pretty sure that it's much much more confortable for this guy to have it's trial in his home country rather than in the US nowdays with all the terrorist paranoia going in this country.

      I am a Moroccan national, and I have partically renounced travelling to the US after all the horrors stories people I know have told me they have faced in US airports.

      Morocco is not really a democratic country (yet), but things are slowly evolving in the good way and nothing similar to Abu Ghraib or Guantanamo has happened lately in Morocco, since Tazmamart which was really horrible for those who have heard about it.

    6. Re:Morocco and Turkey? Bleh by WiFiBro · · Score: 1

      Interesting background report: http://www.sentencingproject.org/pdfs/pub9036.pdf

    7. Re:Morocco and Turkey? Bleh by j-turkey · · Score: 1

      I didn't make the original claim, but your counterexample doesn't work. Abu Grahib and Guantanamo are not necessarily prisons in the criminal justice sense, and would never pass constitutional muster for citizens. As horrible as American prisons are, we 'enjoy' some of the nicest prisons in the world. The 8th amendment has been stretched to ensure that prisoners are given certain 'rights'. Did you know that inmates in American prisons are the only citizens in the country with a constitutional right to free physical and mental health care?

      I do, however, agree that these guys will be made an example of...and IMO, unfairly so. Not that I support what they did. It deserves punishment, but I'm sure that they will be doled out more than they deserve.

      --

      -Turkey

    8. Re:Morocco and Turkey? Bleh by WiFiBro · · Score: 1

      * i said 'apart from Abu Grahib and Guantanamo'
        * "we 'enjoy' some of the nicest prisons in the world." - compared where? well they are at least the largest...
        * "The 8th amendment has been stretched to ensure that prisoners are given certain 'rights'. " that's great but how is the situation in Morocco and elsewhere? the original claimer tried to say the US prison (and I included the justice system) is nicer than others, and I asked him to back it up.

    9. Re:Morocco and Turkey? Bleh by The_Quinn · · Score: 1

      If by horror stories, you mean dealing with a beureaucrat system and the occasional use of harsh language, then please pardon my lack of tears. Traveling to other countries can be a somewhat frightening experience for people, and it tends to make people exaggerate their little inconveniences into "horror stories".

    10. Re:Morocco and Turkey? Bleh by Arcane_Rhino · · Score: 1

      Their best jails would likely not come up to the level of our worst.

      One would think so.

      http://www.mosnews.com/news/2005/08/26/prisonsex.s html

    11. Re:Morocco and Turkey? Bleh by sacrilicious · · Score: 1

      Except now we've got Guantanamo. And that's just the one we know about...

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    12. Re:Morocco and Turkey? Bleh by Arcane_Rhino · · Score: 1

      Sorry, re-reading TFA I see Russia was not where they were busted - another post made it seem so. My mistake.

    13. Re:Morocco and Turkey? Bleh by Khalid · · Score: 1

      Well if you call little inconveniences being held in custody for 24h just because it happens that your name is "Khalid" or "Mohammed" to verify your identity, and that your are at risk of being held for months, well sorry I don't, this has happened to people I personally know.

      On a side note, I believe that the US is great nation, but they are being hysterical and over-acting, they are heading in the wrong direction. They have spent billions of dollars in Irak believing they are fighting terrorism, and the result is that terrorism is more active than ever without any relief in sight. Imagine if those billions were spent to effectively help Africa or the Arab world how the image of America will be in those countries ? instead they have just managed to trigger the ire and wrath of the rest of the world.

      It's a such pity that America just don't know how the rest of the world really is.

    14. Re:Morocco and Turkey? Bleh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet they will be released and eventually pay only a nominal cash penalty (few $$).

      Much better than draconian US cybercrime laws.

    15. Re:Morocco and Turkey? Bleh by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      It's easy to criticize.

      If you think the US is going about this the wrong way, post a better way. Acting like someone's mother-in-law never helps.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    16. Re:Morocco and Turkey? Bleh by cpghost · · Score: 1

      Tazmamart

      There's often a big difference between political prisons and regular jails for normal criminal stuff like... worm writing. Dissidents or people who are percieved as enemies by Governments are often dealt with rather harshly, compared to common law criminals.

      Since that guy apparently wasn't a political opponent, I'm pretty confident that he won't be treated any better or worse than other regular inmates, once convicted. He may even get a mild sentence because of him being so young and probably rather immature. It's just a matter of luck if the judges would bow to political pressures to please Microsoft & Co., or if they resist such pressures to assert their independance as judiciary. And even then, it's also a matter of luck how computer savvy the judges are and how they react to this case.

      After all, it's just like in other parts of the world, considering similar cases.

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    17. Re:Morocco and Turkey? Bleh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I was either of the two suspects I would be crying my eyes out and demanding to be tried and jailed in the US instead of the "Local prosecution". Their best jails would likely not come up to the level of our worst.

      I reckon you've never seen the San Quentin prison? Do you really want to their "bitch"? :)

    18. Re:Morocco and Turkey? Bleh by cpghost · · Score: 1

      Except now we've got Guantanamo

      But the parent said: "jailed in the US"; and Guantanamo is technically outside the US.

      Anyway, US prisons actually don't rank all that well internationally: International Center for Prison Studies.

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    19. Re:Morocco and Turkey? Bleh by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      Also, have any Moroccans ever been convicted for writing viruses?

      The reason I ask this is coz the general experience in most parts of the world is that the first-time virus-writers are usually let off with a gentle slap on their wrists, mostly because the legal systems in question aren't quite sure about what to make of it all. So they generally say, ummm, writing viruses is bad, mmmkay, and let the guy off.

      I'm not saying that this will happen in Morocco, but that this is the general experience if there are no clearly defined laws for 'cybercrime'.

      The question, naturally, is if Morocco has one as yet or not.

    20. Re:Morocco and Turkey? Bleh by Elminst · · Score: 1

      I would say that's mostly correct. Guantanamo Bay is a US naval base.
      And although it is technically not US soil, it has a perpetual lease that never runs out (The US actually pays rent every year, but Castro refuses to cash the checks on principle). And the US has complete "jurisdiction and control" of the Bay. Cuba doesn't have any power over it. And US military bases around the world are effectively US soil.
      In 2004 the Supreme Court ruled that that prisoners in Guantanamo have access to American courts, citing the fact that the U.S. has exclusive control over Guantanamo Bay.
      To me, that means that Guantanamo is considered part of the US.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_Bay

      But the technicality of not being US soil makes a convenient excuse to ignore pesky things like international treaties and Geneva conventions...

      --
      No unauthorized use. Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
    21. Re:Morocco and Turkey? Bleh by DreamerFi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you think the US is going about this the wrong way, post a better way.

      Why? It's not our country. Telling another country how to behave if you don't like it is another US habit the world could do without, so excuse us for not making the same mistake.

    22. Re:Morocco and Turkey? Bleh by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      We (turks) now have a 2004 model punishment law having a section especially for digital thievery even including the term "paid content services".

      I still think that "Atilla" guy is victim of "bad friends" or "trojan infested software". I don't think he coded the virus...

      BTW, there is a huge US embassy and huge NATO base in his hometown. He should be glad he got "busted" instead of... You know whatever ;)

    23. Re:Morocco and Turkey? Bleh by sacrilicious · · Score: 1
      But the parent said: "jailed in the US"; and Guantanamo is technically outside the US.

      Whew, that's a relief! :) I used to worry that Guantanamo somehow reflected on the US.

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    24. Re:Morocco and Turkey? Bleh by cpghost · · Score: 1

      I used to worry that Guantanamo somehow reflected on the US.

      Unfortuately, it does. It's very disturbing, when the executive branch doesn't trust the judicial branch, and tries to evade proper legal procedures (and safeguards) that way. That's certainly not the right way to do it. There's no compelling reason why those prisoners shouldn't be transferred to a prison on US soil, so they can be tried like any other people.

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    25. Re:Morocco and Turkey? Bleh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take it one has never been to federal "pound me in the ass" prison? I hear Slashdot nerds are quite popular there, and it isn't because of their Unix administrations skills either.

    26. Re:Morocco and Turkey? Bleh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hysterical Over-Reacting?!?!? 3000+ innocent Americans were killed on 9/11 in an attack orchestrated by Muslim terrorists. I watched it live and in real time as it was happening. I saw the video of people jumping from the 30th floor windows rather then burn up in the fire! I was in NYC only a month before. I could have watched the attack occur from the observation deck of the Empire State Building! The last time that many Americans were killed in an attack of that magnitude was the bombing of Pearl Harbor and the invasion of the Philippines (an American colony at the time). The resulting hysterical over-reaction was America entering WWII after trying to appease Hitler and avoid another world war. America then proceeded to kick the shit out of the Germans, Italians, and the Japanese. Finally ending the war early by dropping two atomic weapons on Japan. Had America immediately entered the war before the Japanese attacked us, far fewer people would have died on both sides!

      If anything America is guilty of making the same mistake over and over. We ignored the terrorists for two plus decades, allowing them to expand and build their resources to the point where they could really do a lot of damage. We helped Islamic dictatorships who abused their own people. We armed the Mujahdeen in Afghanistan with stinger missiles to fight the Russians but failed to step in when the Russians withdrew. Thus leading to 20 years of civil war and the formation of the Taliban. We also abandoned the Shiites in Iraq after the first Iraq war and a great many of the Shiites were slaughtered by Saddam.

      We are now engaged in a war against Islamofacist terrorists hell bent on a world wide conquest and establishment of an Islamic Caliphate ruling the world under a strict interpretation of Islam that dates back to the middle ages. Unless you want to give up computers, music, television and forsake all entertainment except for religious doctrine and a diet of pure hatred for the Jews; you had better wake up and realize that the threat exists for all people everywhere.

      Frankly, I don't give a shit what the rest of the world thinks of America. If we don't act against this world wide threat it will be too late. Then and only then will the subjugated dhimmi's ask where was America when we needed them? Why must we now be persecuted for being non-muslim? Why must we pay enormous taxes (muslims won't pay tax) and be beaten and spit upon in the streets?

      Don't believe the spin that Islam is a religion of peace. The same way that evangelical Christians believe in the Holy Bible as being the truth the terrorists believe the Koran. Mainstream Islam may be non-violent and peaceful but if you actually read the holy books of Islam, it is full of violence and hatred. Islam is 180 degrees out of phase with Judaism and Christianity. It is the terrorists who believe they are the true believers and all those who don't follow them will be killed or converted with a preference for death.

      The Holy war has begun. America is fighting the enemy and the enemy is coming to Iraq to fight us. 1,800+ Americans have given their lives in the fight. We have killed 50,000+ of the enemy. As long as we don't pull out of Iraq and we keep up the pressure on the enemy we will continue to win. The Iraqi people want to be free, with Americas help they will be free. If we pull out of Iraq it will be completely disastrous! Millions of Iraq's would die in a bloody civil war. America would be at a much greater risk as we would again be perceived as weak by the enemy and the enemy will be again emboldened as they were after Mogadishu (Bin Laden's own perspective).

    27. Re:Morocco and Turkey? Bleh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh? Guantanamo is allot better than any standard american prison where you get assbanged all the time. Least they care about your health while torturing you.

    28. Re:Morocco and Turkey? Bleh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So complaining about whatever the US does is somehow better than coming up with useful suggestions?

  11. how were they caught? by dotpavan · · Score: 5, Funny

    they had apparently commented the code: //.. @uthors: Farid Essebar, Atilla Ekici

    1. Re:how were they caught? by Deviant+Q · · Score: 5, Funny

      No no no, these days you've got to do it right... JavaDoc syntax!

      /**
      * @package Pwnz0ringVirusOfDeath
      * @subpackage PwningModule
      * @author Farid Essebar, Atilla Ekici
      * @copyright Copyright © 2005, WePwnJ00 Inc.
      */
      --
      "May the days be aimless. Let the seasons drift. Do not advance the action according to a plan."
    2. Re:how were they caught? by ndansmith · · Score: 1

      When asked by interrogators concerning the damning code, they simply replied: "No #".

    3. Re:how were they caught? by frekio · · Score: 1

      I am honestly interested in how they were caught... Does anyone have any idea? Were some of the initial machines found that started spreading infections and then connections were traced back from there? Was there something in the actual worm's binary? Did they brag in some chatroom? Had some police been watching them already?

      Just curious about how they caught them so fast...

  12. Re:Young by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Too bad the rest of us have to share a network with Windows users. When viruses hit Windows hard, the whole network suffers.

  13. It's a real shame by saskboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's a shame that these idiot kids can't make a program that every computer [that runs Windows anyway] could use, and then when they get the urge to explot a Windows hole, they'd have a payload that would do more than cause reboots and crashes, and could do something useful like calculate something for medical science, patch the hole they exploit without doing damage, or play a podcast with a good message.

    ANYTHING. The lack of creativity in today's vandals is just pitiful.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    1. Re:It's a real shame by LehiNephi · · Score: 1

      ANYTHING. The lack of creativity in today's vandals is just pitiful. Amen to that. Of course, if worm authors only wrote worms that patched holes and caused no ill effect, they wouldn't be able to brag to their kiddie friends that "I took down half the internet!!!" In addition, I'm afraid of what the Microsoft corporate reaction would be. Officially, they can't condone it, especially if the hole-patching worm didn't work properly (remember a couple years ago?). But it might make them a bit more laxadaisical when it comes to patching.

      --
      Help find a cure for cancer. Join the [H]orde
    2. Re:It's a real shame by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm still waiting for the virus that infects systems through vulnerabilities in IE or Outlook/OE, then:
      • Installs Firefox
      • Configures it to be the default browser
      • Imports the IE favorites to the bookmarks,
      • Edits the registry to disable IE as much as possible
      • Installs Thunderbird
      • Configures it to be the default email client
      • Imports contents of Outlook and OE address book to Thunderbird
      • Uninstalls Outlook Express and OE
      • Deletes itself
      The writer of this 'virus' should get a frickin' medal.
      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    3. Re:It's a real shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I often have the urge to exploit a windows hole, oh wait wrong site...

    4. Re:It's a real shame by saskboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "The writer of this 'virus' should get a frickin' medal."

      He's more likely to get beaten to death by people raking in the money from removing spyware and repairing viruses.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    5. Re:It's a real shame by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It's a shame that these idiot kids can't make a program that every computer [that runs Windows anyway] could use

      Sounds like they already did.

    6. Re:It's a real shame by JFitzsimmons · · Score: 1

      Monkeyboy, geeze, think of what you just said. You missed a propogation step! A worm really isn't a worm without it...

      (also, OE and Outlook Express are the same thing - and they can't be uninstalled)

      --
      Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master. -Anonymous
    7. Re:It's a real shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I create a TrpM5+r worm, do you promise to swim to Antarctica?

    8. Re:It's a real shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I would say: it is a shame that those kids were arrested because they exploited one of the holes of an operating system.

      There are system administrators, security experts so that if they do their job well nothing like this should be harmfull to an enterprise. As I am a system administrator it is often funny to play with hackers toys, so that you know the real threat (rootkit under linux for me).

      There have always been and there will always be hackers, so fix the OS or don't go online

    9. Re:It's a real shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the type of people that do this type of stuff are normaly bot harvesters. the main aim of what there doing is to get as many computers under there control as they can. that may not be the situation for mytob and zotob (it seems the case though)

      they dont care about making anything usefull for anything other then them selfs.

    10. Re:It's a real shame by hammeredpeon · · Score: 1

      that's because the ones with creativity use the creativeness to make money. the ones who find out about a security hole and then write something to make your computer reboot and crash aren't the ones you want contributing to society. they'll make better prison poodles.

      --
      best college pickem site ever: pickem.terrbear.org
    11. Re:It's a real shame by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm waiting for the worm that installs itself, grabs a baseball and begins beating the user over the head shouting in a William Shatner voice "Look... you fucking idiot... don't open... mail with attachments..."

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    12. Re:It's a real shame by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      The lack of creativity in today's vandals is just pitiful.

      Not that yesterday's vandals were any less pitiful.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    13. Re:It's a real shame by briancurtin · · Score: 1, Informative

      oh really? they cant be uninstalled? wrong.

      --
      My UID is a palindrome, that must be good for some type of prize.
    14. Re:It's a real shame by PhilipMckrack · · Score: 1

      The place I work was infected with Yankee Doodle for about 3 weeks once. We would think we got rid of it then some random computer we thought was clean would be used and it would reinfect them all, playing "Yankee Doodle" over the pc speakers at some oddball time, like 4:43 or something. I was kind of sad when we finally got rid of it.

    15. Re:It's a real shame by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 1

      Then it downloads a Ubuntu liveCD, overwrites that MBR on the hard drive, and reboots the machine.

    16. Re:It's a real shame by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 1

      Yes. Exactly. I want a medal *goes off coding* oh damn i have no idea how to write a virus. Oh yeah plus that would be bad PR for mozilla, having their stuff related to viruses. A better virus would be one that backs up your data to a remote fileserver and turns your computer into an open source ad, by making you not even realize that you aren't using windows.

      --
      All your base are belong to Wii.
    17. Re:It's a real shame by kooshvt · · Score: 1

      Years ago when I first got my cable connection, I used to scan for computers on my subnet that had windows file sharing turned on. I would then connect to their shared printer and print out a document explaining to them how to disable this feature.

      I tried being helpful, that is until I received a certified letter from the cable company requesting me to stop my activities.

      I didn't have any other options for broadband and really didn't want to lose my connection so I didn't bother trying to explain that I was providing them with a free service that would save them money in tech support calls when someone more malicious comes along.

  14. Interesting the speed of things recently... by GecKo213 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think it's interesting that when these worms were originally introduced, and started first infecting machines, how the media made such a big deal about how quickly after the security hole was announced the worm was unleashed. I find it a bit more interesting the speed with which law enforcement is able to nab the creator of such programs. It used to be, "We don't know where in the hell to start!" to now it's more like "When can we pick this person up and how are we going to prosecute them here or there."

    Just my thoughts.
    --
    Generation Trance: What generation are you?
    1. Re:Interesting the speed of things recently... by Yehooti · · Score: 1

      While it's interesting to see how quickly these culprits were caught, I have to be distressed over the doubt that exists within me as to whether they would have been snagged so quickly if they had not nailed a major news network.

  15. Boy am I glad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that I actually know how to apply Windows bugfixes.

  16. Quick question. by mctk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How on earth do they find these people?

    --
    Paul Grosfield - the quicker picker upper.
    1. Re:Quick question. by MrP-(at+work) · · Score: 1

      Simple process really 1. Open foreign countries phone book to random page 2. Randomly point at someone 3. Charge them as a h4x0r 4. Look good in the public eye for catching evil h4x0rs What, you really thought these people were guilty?

      --
      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    2. Re:Quick question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      from TFA they tried to run a bankcard scam with info they obtained from compromised machines.

    3. Re:Quick question. by GecKo213 · · Score: 2, Informative

      1) They very stupidly could have launched the worm from their own computer rather than a public computer say 50 miles away in a library somewhere.

      2) They could have run the program when they compiled it for the final time by doing a compile and run versus just compile.



      It's always something like that happens when these guys get busted. They get comfortable and forget to do something that they needed to cover their tracks due to lack of extreme paranoia.
      --
      Generation Trance: What generation are you?
    4. Re:Quick question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They brag.

      Computer geeks or not, virus writers are not the sharpest tools in the box. If they were really all that 'leet, they'd be able to make an honest living with their mad ski11z.

    5. Re:Quick question. by anon*127.0.0.1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or they bragged about how 133t they were to the wrong people, and someone decided to turn them in to try and pick up the Microsoft bounty.

      --
      I am NOT a man!
      I am a free number!
    6. Re:Quick question. by Goaway · · Score: 1

      The best part about this question is how there's the one response that mentions that the answer is in the article, and the rest are just shooting their mouths off.

    7. Re:Quick question. by Tambourman · · Score: 1

      According to the article, they apparently signed their nicknames into the code. D'Oh!

    8. Re:Quick question. by wasted+time · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This begs the question - how many "smart" virus writers just assume another persons identity to commit these acts, intentionally throwing the blame/investigation elsewhere. Know your enemies better than your friends.

      --
      The Stone Age did not end because humans ran out of stones. - William McDonough
    9. Re:Quick question. by camcorder · · Score: 2, Informative

      Authors of that worm was using infomation stored on victims' computers for bankcard forgery. According to what I read from local news, Atilla guy was caught because he was moving money from victims' bank accounts to another account.

      With such a connection to accounts, it's not a rocket science to catch writers. I think Turkish guy thought Turkey is heaven to do such things without any kind of anonymity in Turkey but evidently he was wrong.

    10. Re:Quick question. by cstream_chris · · Score: 1

      Typically authors of such code are proud of their work and as such will sign their name in the source. This is a common practice and has happened with almost every worm. The interesting question would be how the go about finding the programmer based on their handle

    11. Re:Quick question. by loqi · · Score: 1

      I guess they must be real freedom-lovers too, to open-source their virus code like that and let their handles be known.

      --
      If other reasons we do lack, we swear no one will die when we attack
    12. Re:Quick question. by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 1

      They probably have a stable of usual suspects to draw in on situations like this. It's important to make a big media splash with a rapid arrest when a gaping security hole like this comes along. Probably wouldn't be that hard to convince Turkey or Morocco to keep a list handy.

    13. Re:Quick question. by Zweideutig · · Score: 1

      If there is a static string in the binary, there is no need for source, it is not a comment. Just run strings on the binary.

      --
      Powered by caffeine and sugar; BSD
    14. Re:Quick question. by loqi · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I was wielding the razor-sharp edge of sarcasm against this snippet from the GP:
      will sign their name in the source

      --
      If other reasons we do lack, we swear no one will die when we attack
  17. cheap monty python quote by tont0r · · Score: 1

    CROWD:A witch! A witch! Burn her! Burn her! Burn her! We've found a witch!
    VILLAGER: We have found a witch. May we burn her?
    CROWD: Burn her! Burn! Burn her! Burn her!
    BEDEVERE: How do you know she is a witch?
    VILLAGER: She looks like one.
    CROWD: Right! Yeah! Yeah!

  18. AKA Coder? by rokka · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh my god, does this kid suffer from a lack of imagination or what?!

    --
    I could be wrong. I'm always wrong...
    1. Re:AKA Coder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or has so much imagination, that it went past you. We all joke about naming our dog, "dog," or our cat, "dog," but how many people go through w/ naming their person something so obvious?

      Don't be angry you didn't think of it first.

    2. Re:AKA Coder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, no I'll stick to lack of imagination.

    3. Re:AKA Coder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Proving more the point you lack it.

      Q.E.D.

    4. Re:AKA Coder? by GrumpySimon · · Score: 1

      Of course he doesn't, he's a virus 'Coder'.

      If he had imagination he'd be busy writing the next operating system, or building the next google, or doing pretty much ANYTHING else other than f**king up other peoples lives.

      --Simon

  19. What a bunch of shit by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The worm also is thought to have temporarily disabled the systems that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security uses to screen airline passengers entering the United States.

    Oh so the airport screening machines are on the internet, are they? I feel safer in the hands of people as competent as the DHS already...

    Or more likely, this is just another piece of DHS propaganda designed to enphasize how dangerous those virus writers are. So dangerous they can disable our precious airport security systems! Terrorists!!

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:What a bunch of shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you have absolutely no clue about networked system do you?

    2. Re:What a bunch of shit by tont0r · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      i do know that UPS had a shit time working things with their airline transports. it boiled down to manually checking the packages. a friend of mine was lucky enough to get picked for that job. so its not all propaganda.

    3. Re:What a bunch of shit by freshman_a · · Score: 3, Insightful


      Oh so the airport screening machines are on the internet, are they?

      Or more likely, someone brought in an infected laptop and connected it to the network...

      Not that it's a much better situation, but just because a computer (or network) has a virus on it, does not mean it's on the internet.

    4. Re:What a bunch of shit by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Insightful

      UPS != DHS

      UPS is a commercial venture, they may have grave problems, but it's not a matter of national security.

      The DHS on the other hand, given the important task of securing the homeland that they've been given, if they can't be trusted to use something other than Windows connected directly to the net to do their job, they should be kicked in the butt.

      My suspicion however is that they're not that stupid, they probably do have secure systems and networks, and that's what leads me to deduce that the statement in TFA about kids half-way around the globe being able to disable airport security is a crock of shit. Either way, the DHS should be investigated, either for negligence, or for misleading the public.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    5. Re:What a bunch of shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better than your mastery of grammar.

    6. Re:What a bunch of shit by TheSkyIsPurple · · Score: 1

      Doesn't have to be on the internet. If they are on any network, and anyone brings any machine that has been connected to a network that a compromised machine has been connected to... and so on Those laptops'll kill ya every time

    7. Re:What a bunch of shit by dR.fuZZo · · Score: 1

      Oh so the airport screening machines are on the internet, are they? I feel safer in the hands of people as competent as the DHS already...

      Or more likely, this is just another piece of DHS propaganda designed to enphasize how dangerous those virus writers are.

      "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."

      --
      -- dR.fuZZo
    8. Re:What a bunch of shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even scarier...the airport screening machines run Windows

    9. Re:What a bunch of shit by erroneus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have a hard time believing that they disabled any of the screening machines. I have operated most of the machines in use (a year ago anyway) and while the larger machines use Windows as the console, the machines themselves use Unix variants inside. The smaller machines are Unix variants on the console as well.

      I can't speak for airports other than the one I worked at, but while the machines were capable of being networked, I saw no indication that they were actively used as anything but stand-alone machines. (That's not to say they weren't... just that I saw no indication of it.) To me it means that these machines aren't likely to have been infected unless a technician connected a laptop to it and inadvertently infected one. As much as I would like to bad-mouth DHS and the TSA, I can't in this area -- it just doesn't seem likely to me.

      Now that said, I know all of their office systems are Windows and could have been vulnerable. But again, the systems at the airport I worked didn't have much in the way of network connections (most of the time, no network connection at all). So again, I don't think airport systems, administrative or operational were vulnerable to network infection. ...if I were recognised as even a little bit valuable to their operation from a network-security standpoint, I might have tried to make my career there, but alas, they only wanted me as a screener... (If you want to get promoted in the DHS, it's best if you are either non-white or female... bonus if you're both!) I guess this might be true of just about any government job but it really left a bitter taste behind with me.... oh well... enough off-topic complaints.

    10. Re:What a bunch of shit by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      Not sure, but they may have meant the machines on the other end, not the screening machines themselves.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    11. Re:What a bunch of shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DHS machines hosting the systems to which you refer were patched on 0-day of the vuln being announced. That is all.

  20. makes sense to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've found that those with unique rl names, choose bland screen names.

    Sort of like how the weak/shy personas use aggressive/offsensive screen names.

    1. Re:makes sense to me by wasted+time · · Score: 2, Funny

      come on, next you'll be telling me that you're brave in rl and my time spent here is productive or something.

      --
      The Stone Age did not end because humans ran out of stones. - William McDonough
    2. Re:makes sense to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too funny. Although it doesn't quite work on a default UID.

  21. FBI has become a world-wide police force. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 3, Interesting


    It is interesting that the U.S. government's FBI agency has become a world-wide police force.

    --
    Trying to make one book explain all of life makes some people crazy enough to kill.

    1. Re:FBI has become a world-wide police force. by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It is interesting that the U.S. government's FBI agency has become a world-wide police force.

      Yes, especially considering how very careful all the other US administrations have been of not butting in other countries' affairs since the end of WWII...

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:FBI has become a world-wide police force. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be Team America, not the FBI.

    3. Re:FBI has become a world-wide police force. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What is so strange about that? They can work together with Interpol and other police forces if they want to. FBI takes the cause to find Internet idiots and I praise them for that.
      I'm all in for all governments agencies to work together to hunt these people down.

    4. Re:FBI has become a world-wide police force. by mellonhead · · Score: 3, Informative
      It is interesting that the U.S. government's FBI agency has become a world-wide police force.

      The FBI has Legal Attaché Offices in approximately 50 countries world-wide.

      http://www.fbi.gov/contact/legat/legat.htm

    5. Re:FBI has become a world-wide police force. by hyfe · · Score: 1

      Has become?

      --
      "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
    6. Re:FBI has become a world-wide police force. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm all in for all governments agencies to work together to hunt these people down.

      Well, at least until they decide your one of the people they want to hunt down, anyway. Right?

    7. Re:FBI has become a world-wide police force. by jswalter9 · · Score: 1

      America... FUCK YEAH! :)

      --
      Retired from software... maybe. Sort of.
    8. Re:FBI has become a world-wide police force. by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      Most law enforcement agencies have informal agreements between them to apprehend each other's suspects as and when the situation may arise. This is particularly true for cybercrime teams.

      The FBI may have become a worldwide force, but this sadly *does not* prove it has.

  22. Microsoft Assisted the Worm Investigation by newsblaze · · Score: 3, Informative

    Microsoft Assisted Worm Investigation Microsoft's Internet Crime Investigations Team supported the investigation with law enforcement immediately following the release of the two worms. Microsoft provided technical information and analytical support to the FBI on this case, which was then shared with Moroccan and Turkish authorities.

    --
    Daily News http://newsblaze.com
  23. A Moroccan Proverb says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Among walnuts only the empty one speaks.

  24. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    actually, i think microsoft should hire them on to their security team. ms could apparently use a few more code reviewers...

  25. Re:Screen Moniker by GecKo213 · · Score: 1

    Must be in Europe somewhere? They always have odd ways of saying things. Cargo area in the rear (or front) of a vehicle for example.
    USA = Trunk
    Europe = Boot

    They use Monicals over there I think... ;) There is more than one movie out there that shows them being used by Europeans.



    If you can't already tell this was supposed to be funny.
    --
    Generation Trance: What generation are you?
  26. That, and... by wurp · · Score: 1

    He was *writing and distributing worms* and using his RL name online might have struck him as a bad idea.

    1. Re:That, and... by shmlco · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but how else does he get "credit" for it?

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
  27. Re:It's Windows by PyroX_Pro · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pointing at the emperor and throwing rocks at his balls are two very different things. They could of just pointed. They went the rocks at balls path.

  28. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  29. Re:It's Windows by Njoyda+Sauce · · Score: 1

    The real problem is that the childen are "pointing it out" by kicking the emperor in the balls.

    Can't condone violence.

    --

    You can only be young once, but you can be immature forever.
  30. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    boy, you are a retard aren't you. these people that were arrested didn't find the flaw, they merely plugged the thing into an already-existing virus base (blaster) and clicked on it. they don't deserve jobs for the fbi. they are just a bunch of script kiddies

    -Anonymous Coward

  31. I don't get it... by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

    Why don't the worms actually do something really destructive, like erase partition tables or cause irreversible damage?

    That, to me, would seem like the choice route.. instead they're mild "blah blah, I will infect you and do nothing but infect others" apps.

    Shame..

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    1. Re:I don't get it... by LehiNephi · · Score: 1

      Ah, but you see, without the replication, the worm is nothing. I don't think worm-writing is so much about [i]causing damage[/i] as it is about [i]bragging rights[/i]. So there's little point in going through the extra effort to add in the destructive payload.

      --
      Help find a cure for cancer. Join the [H]orde
    2. Re:I don't get it... by Yaa+101 · · Score: 1

      Like in real life virii do not need to be too destructive to be successfull. If the carriers die off too soon there is no propagation.

    3. Re:I don't get it... by tzuriel · · Score: 1

      A lot of these worms are meant to create botnets for file servers (irc or ftp). The users want them to maintain the health of the machine so they can exploit those resources to serve their files, run their DDOS attacks, or send their spam. A worm that causes damage would obviously defeat this purpose.

    4. Re:I don't get it... by Cheeze · · Score: 1

      i dunno, I think one that wiped command.com off of the c:\ would be awesome. That way, all win98, win95, winme, win98se, etc would die.

      --
      Why read the article when I can just make up a snap judgement?
    5. Re:I don't get it... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      So there's little point in going through the extra effort to add in the destructive payload.

      The kid that wiped out 75% of America's computers would pretty much be (in)famous forever. You don't think that's an attraction? I'm amazed it hasn't happened already.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    6. Re:I don't get it... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      If the carriers die off too soon there is no propagation.

      Key phrase: too soon. Imagine a worm that replicated for a day or so before cleaning house. It would spread almost as quickly as non-limited worms, but would inflict far, far more damage.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    7. Re:I don't get it... by jayhawk88 · · Score: 1

      Yes but as someone already mentioned, a virus that destroys the computer it infects does not make it to 75% of computers.

    8. Re:I don't get it... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      a virus that destroys the computer it infects before spreading does not make it to 75% of computers.

      I inserted the words you left out. Would Slammer or Code Red have spread more slowly if they nuked C: after 4 days? No. By that point, the infection had pretty much reached saturation and was on the decline.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    9. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because, no matter how much you trash it, it's acutaly fairly hard to cause that level of damage on a Windows (or Mac) system. If they wanted to kill the macihe, they can do it after replicating, they don't because it's not as easy as slashdot likes to make it seem.

    10. Re:I don't get it... by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      if i =100
      delete partition table
      end

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    11. Re:I don't get it... by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 1

      Because that wouldn't propagate their worms. *doh* What they could do is set it to send the worm to everyone on their contacts list and THEN erase their partition tables, or perhaps overclock every piece of hardware in their machine until it bursts into flame.

      --
      All your base are belong to Wii.
    12. Re:I don't get it... by lasindi · · Score: 1

      Why don't the worms actually do something really destructive, like erase partition tables or cause irreversible damage?

      Shame..


      ... why is it a "shame" that they cause less damage? Shouldn't it be a relief?

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable proof of this theorem that this sig is too small to contain.
    13. Re:I don't get it... by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      eek... slashdot deleted the rest of this.

      basically----
      programs wait till it succesfully infects 100 systems.
      after that, it deletes the partition table.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    14. Re:I don't get it... by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      Ehh?

      If you have admin priviledges, you can easily delete the partition table, or you can start securely deleting files.

      Hell, you can schedule the system to securely delete *every* file on the next reboot, and then either causes the system to freeze, or call a shutdown.

      Admin priviledges means you can kill someone's installation. I could do it, and I am a very, very mediocre programmer. I can only imagine what a skilled programmer could do.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    15. Re:I don't get it... by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah, that's what I mean.

      Spread to 5-10 machines then cause the havok.

      --
      We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    16. Re:I don't get it... by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

      eh, not really.

      Personally, I keep my stuff updated.

      I thought Code Red was amazing.

      It's truly funny how many people are fucking lazy and naive enough to NOT update their systems after many many years of hearing about viruses.

      I mean really, you gotta be pretty fuckin dumb to not know about keeping your system up to date, or at least acknowledge that viruses exist.

      When the worms hit, people flip.

      It's even better when big companies get hit because they're the ones pumping shitloads of money into supposed "experienced" network admins.. and what happens? Shit hits the fan.

      I love it.

      --
      We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    17. Re:I don't get it... by lasindi · · Score: 1

      It's truly funny how many people are fucking lazy and naive enough to NOT update their systems after many many years of hearing about viruses.

      I mean really, you gotta be pretty fuckin dumb to not know about keeping your system up to date, or at least acknowledge that viruses exist.


      Yes, people ought to be good about maintaining their computers, but I don't understand why you think it's great that people exploit this. You seem to glorify the ruining of computers, and I don't understand why. Shame on those who let their guard down, but the real blame rests on the criminals themselves. Just because a house is unlocked doesn't mean that someone has a right to break into it to prove that the owner was lax on security.

      It's even better when big companies get hit because they're the ones pumping shitloads of money into supposed "experienced" network admins.. and what happens? Shit hits the fan.

      I love it.


      Suppose you go to a town that just got hit by a tornado and you see a building with in-tact windows that weren't boarded up.Do you think, "darn, I wish that tornado was more destructive so these folks would have lost their home. Obviously they deserve it because they're lazy." I hope not. Yeah, people should be more vigilant, but it doesn't mean they deserve to have their stuff destroyed.

      Just as tornadoes shouldn't be seen as a good thing, neither should computer destruction. And unlike tornadoes, cyber crimes are caused by jerks (to put it nicely) who, instead of being glorified, need to spend some time behind bars.

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable proof of this theorem that this sig is too small to contain.
    18. Re:I don't get it... by arkhan_jg · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because
      a) that would slow the rate of infection, and it's lifetime (I still see the odd laptop infected with blaster)

      b) an infected machine they can pull credit card numbers off of (which they did in this case) or send spam with, is much more valuable to writers these days than just killing it.

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    19. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      When I see a tornado or hurricane item on the news, and "entire trailer parks were flattened", I sometimes have my thoughts about better preparing for weather events, yes. There are housing constructs that are better proofed to a gush of wind than a trailer.
      This does not mean that the owner deserves it to be destroyed, but he could have taken better measures. Same with computers.

      Also I agree with the original poster that it is funny to see those big guys who are supposedly using all of Microsoft corporate management tools to be taken by every worm, while at our company with a better understanding about what is really happening and a tight policy on what is allowed (like not having a direct or NAT routing to Internet, not allowing any executable in by mail or web, not running workstations with administrative privileges) we have never ever even had the slightest worm or virus problem.

    20. Re:I don't get it... by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

      Hahaha.. bad analogy. People don't die or lose their HOUSES because of a computer virus. You can lose files, sure, but if it wasn't backed up, then it's obviously not important.

      Anyway...

      As for why I think it's great: people are stupid and naive. The general population needs a good slap in the face to wake up to this shit because they obviously haven't learned their lesson from Code Red, MSBlaster, or any of the other plethora of viruses/worms that have been glorified in the media over the past few years.

      I'm just curious as to why virus/worm authors aren't more destructive with their code. I would be. I think it would make a bigger impact and force people to learn their lesson.

      Then again, these worm authors weren't very intelligent. It's damn near impossible to get tracked as the source of a worm unless you were fuckin obvious about sending it out.

      Not only that, but we live in an age where naive goons buy up wireless technology and don't even bother to secure the damn things. Unleash it over those networks and you'll never get caught.

      --
      We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
  32. Happy Bithday, Joshi by unsigned+integer · · Score: 5, Funny
    Reminds me of the DOS 'Pac Man' virus ... everytime you typed a '.', a little pac-man would run out and eat it. It cracks me up everytime I think about it for some reason. Why don't we have some viruses that act more as 'creative grafitti', rather that pure tools of spam and DDoS slaves? If they are relatively benign enough, I could picture letting them run on my computer for kicks. :-)

    Happy Birthday, Joshi.

    1. Re:Happy Bithday, Joshi by wasted+time · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why don't we have some viruses that act more as 'creative grafitti'

      We do still have these. They're called freeware or shareware. You'll find them on websites all over the place. Most of the time they come with hidden surprises too!

      --
      The Stone Age did not end because humans ran out of stones. - William McDonough
    2. Re:Happy Bithday, Joshi by Salvo · · Score: 1

      Or the "DiskWasher" Virus which made your Drive sound like a Washing Machine, complete with Rinse Sound Effects and Spin Cycle.
      Didn't do much good for your hardware though...

    3. Re:Happy Bithday, Joshi by saskboy · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but that's the inverse idea, it's a trojan that messes things up, when the person thinks they are getting something neat.
      The creative grafitti idea would be a virus that instead of doing something dumb or just evil, actually improves the computer in some way, or at least doesn't screw things up irreversibly for the average user.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    4. Re:Happy Bithday, Joshi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what's that whooshing sound?

  33. Local prosecution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I guess they can kiss thier keyoard hands goodbye.

    - moomin

  34. It was the patch stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not like the found these holes on their own. They analyzed the patches that were released, and wrote something to exploit the problem that was being fixed.

    There's no way to combat that sort of attack, apart from not ever having bugs, ever. Which is unrealistic, and unattainable.

  35. Re:It's Windows by Pragmatix · · Score: 1

    There is a big difference between pointing out that the emperor has no clothes and running up and smacking him on the balls.

  36. wish viruses were more like these by tont0r · · Score: 2, Funny

    the virii in hackers were a lot more fun. best quote ever:
    GUY: SIR! WEVE GOT A COOKIE MONSTER!
    other guy: TYPE COOKIE YOU IDIOT!

    1. Re:wish viruses were more like these by spyder913 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hey they didn't make that up for the movie...

      http://www.multicians.org/cookie.html

  37. Re:Wow by Tikicult · · Score: 1

    Who says that the FBI hires good people... retard.

  38. Re:Slashdot Worm Pic reminds me of.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    did she too spread for all the people, like the worm spread to all the systems?

  39. People should be thanking them.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By making fairly harmless (ie: no permenant physical damage to the machines) worms using exploitable holes, this encouraged MS to patch and everyone to upgrade. In the wrong hands, the exploits could have been used to erase data, set voltages higher than they should be, all sorts of MUCH WORSE THINGS.

    1. Re:People should be thanking them.. by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      I think there should be dirty viruses, which infect your system and then show disgusting and depraved diplays; like Pat Robertson suggesting Chavez by offed, or Bob Dole talking about his prostate gland.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  40. Re:It's Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bah he's not insightful, stupid moderators, heads way up their asses. It was released POST PATCH.

  41. Re:Light sentences by dotpavan · · Score: 1

    or they could be made to write a code to avoid dupes at slashdot.. and for every dupe, their genitals electrocuted?

  42. Re:Wow by ezweave · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To further ammend that, the problem is not code reviews, it's the MS design (or lack thereof). Alot of MS exploits are not issues where the code was defective as much as where the design was defective. Take, for example, the Slammer worm. You would ask the SQlServer instance for a database (directory service over UDP), then get a good old buffer overflow by making a bad request (not formatted properly). (My memory is a bit rusty on the details, check out wired for a slightly closer look.)

    Code reviews, usually find the "duh" type of bugs. As in, poor control structures, misuse of class/methods. The security type flaws can only be fixed by: better design (what could someone do to this) or having people hack at your solution as part of testing (aha, look what I can do). Now the slammer fix could (and probably was) as simple as a check on the length of the request.

    Now (knowing that), if I worked at Microsoft, I would be checking for that in code reviews... I mean they have been bitten by this numerous times and a buffer overflow attack is one of the oldest tricks in the book. And yet this is also a process thing: the guys who wrote the code that performs the search probably don't know alot about low level details, and those guys didn't know the restrictions, which points back to design.

  43. Boy am I glad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that I don't have Internet access.

  44. Re:Young by MightyMartian · · Score: 1, Funny
    They're so young! Amazing...

    Yes, but their midochlorian count was through the roof. I hear tell that once they get off their prison sentence turning Wookie turds into Jedi lounge furniture, the Emperor will hire them as consultants.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  45. Re:It's Windows by crimethinker · · Score: 3, Funny
    I'd like to abuse your metaphor in a different way than the other posters.

    Imagine that a clothing company uses very shoddy materials and cuts corners in its production, yet they are popular enough that 9 out of 10 people will be wearing that brand of clothing. The clothes are crap, sub-standard, and you just know that if people realized this, the company would either improve, or people would buy their clothes elsewhere. To that end, you walk down a busy street and grab a handful of cloth every which way, easily ripping the shirts off 9 out of 10 women who pass by you.

    Should you be jailed for "merely" demonstrating this weakness?

    -paul

    --
    Pistol caliber is like religion: everyone has their favourite, and theirs is the only right choice.
  46. Re:It's Windows by vinnythenose · · Score: 1

    A lot of posts referring to balls in response to your post.

    interesting...

    --
    --- I used to moderate, then I read the -1 articles and decided having to filter through them was not worth it.
  47. Would you use your real name? by phorm · · Score: 1

    Umm, you forget that it was his screen-name as a cracker/worm-writer. Would you really want to use your real-name for such things, just makes it easier for the feds to find you.

  48. Just Hoping... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    Both individuals will be subject to local prosecutions, the FBI said.

    Hope that includes torture.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Just Hoping... by sodul · · Score: 1
      Both individuals will be subject to local prosecutions, the FBI said.
      Hope that includes torture.
      They said local prosecutions not that the US is going to extradite them !
  49. Re:It's Windows by Himring · · Score: 0, Troll

    You really think MS's patch system is all about "your" security? It's driven, was created and exists due to MS's lawyers. They cannot be blamed -- as your yourself argue -- for the flaws in Windows. After all, they put out a patch, warned everyone, and people just don't do what the good MS tells them. But, my anonymous friend, you are overlooking that this is a flawed OS from the start, from the beginning, and MS really hasn't cared about security from the get-go. Where are the viruses taking down Netware, taking down Linux/Unix? They are not there. Why? Because those houses were built on a good foundation with thoughtful administration in mind. Windows is a house built on a swamp, but since the builder keeps telling you about the spot in the bog about to make the corner sink just before it sinks you are freely willing to believe that it's your fault.

    So, now, who is the one not being insightful?...

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
  50. New market for MS? by phorm · · Score: 1

    Actually, if MS wanted to branch out to new markets, this would be a good place to start. Start a hacking/virus investigative branch and sell your services in tracking down the little bastards that write these worms/viruses.

    1. Re:New market for MS? by newsblaze · · Score: 1

      Yes they are very good at doing that. They are one of the few companies with the resources and ability to get started and keep it going. Now they know the groundrules, they could turn it into a business.

      --
      Daily News http://newsblaze.com
    2. Re:New market for MS? by rhizome · · Score: 2, Insightful

      indeed. they've already set the groundwork for popular and exploitable technologies, the only thing left is for them to play cop for the crimes they invented.

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
    3. Re:New market for MS? by shmlco · · Score: 1

      Seems like there's a conflict of interest there. Especially when one side encourages the other to produce more holes that can be exploited, so there's something to track down...

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    4. Re:New market for MS? by newsblaze · · Score: 1

      Oh, you are sharp! Like the Dilbert company selling manuals for its impossible-to-use products!

      --
      Daily News http://newsblaze.com
  51. Infrastructure isn't cheap by jfengel · · Score: 1

    Systems like that do have to be integrated with each other, and they need updates. You can either lay brand-new cable (and make sure that nobody physically hacks into it) or you can re-use the existing infrastructure.

    The latter is a hell of a lot cheaper. And it's effective if you restrict what sorts of programs are used on the computer. Like there's no reason for these to have had port 445 open in the first place. (It's a hell of a lot easier to control open ports with Linux than with Windows.)

    Restrict incoming bits to just the port you're expecting (or even better, make it "pull" and accept no unsolicited bits), and practice good software development, and you shouldn't have this problem.

  52. Re:Informative link???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >In the interest of stimulating more informed discussion...

    You do know you are posting on Slashdot right?

  53. Re:It's Windows by Moofie · · Score: 1

    If you do it accidentally, once, absolutely not.

    If you do it premeditatedly, on a large scale, as some kind of "Fabric Avenger", then absolutely.

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  54. IMoniker by jfengel · · Score: 1

    who the hell uses the term 'screen moniker'??

    COM programmers, perhaps?

  55. Re:It's a real shame - missing step by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    Installs Firefox
    .
    .
    Uninstalls Outlook Express and OE

    Sets FF and TB icons to resemble IE and OE for clueless users.
    Deletes itself.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  56. Sibling rivalry... by google · · Score: 1

    Pointing at someone's balls and grabbing and twisting them and then pulling really hard is different. So if you're naked in public, expect to get at least get the finger of the children. And then there's the emporer, who's like a child, but bigger and naked. And he probably doesn't use crayons like the children who wrote the things that made him naked.

    Or something like that.

    Was anyone else concerned about the fact that there's now 4 replies that use the words balls? Maybe the 'naked emporer' image wasn't the right one to conjure up here...

    --
    "Thank you. Please spellcheck your genitalia references though. :) - Mike D."
  57. Diabl0 & Coder should be given medals by veganopolis · · Score: 1

    They force people to build more secure systems. How is this wrong? People like this are keeping software developers on their toes. I say good on them...

    1. Re:Diabl0 & Coder should be given medals by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      I agree. They should be given medals.

      Ones made of lead, and propelled at high velocity by smokeless gunpowder.

    2. Re:Diabl0 & Coder should be given medals by bcuriel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm assuming you didn't read any of the articles above.

      The exploit was for a patch MICROSOFT HAD ALREADY RELEASED. They were merely taking advantage of the hole that Microsoft revealed by making the patch available.

      I fail to see how these guys deserve anything but the punishment they are getting.

    3. Re:Diabl0 & Coder should be given medals by ranolen · · Score: 0
      If they should be given medals, then you should be punched in the side of the head. Would you like it if I came into your house and stole stuff from you, just because you have a window that might not lock just right? That's the same type of thing that they did only with computers.

      Pull your head out of your ass!!!

    4. Re:Diabl0 & Coder should be given medals by veganopolis · · Score: 1

      Nothing was stolen. And if someone wants what I have badly enough they can have it. I really don't care. Actually, you can have everything I own. It doesn't mean anything to me.

      If you want to stop this from happening then learn a valuable lesson. Windows will always fall victim to these types of attacks. Switch your OS.

    5. Re:Diabl0 & Coder should be given medals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Murderers force people to be more aware of their surroundings and the dangers that people can face. How is that wrong?

      Murderers help keep arms distributors, law enforcement, doctors, hospital personnel, therapists, psychologists, and media outlets, as well many others in business.

      With all the good murderers do for this country, how dare you punish them with long prison sentences. Who are you to enforce your morals and ideas of what's right and wrong on people who help us?

      Because that's what you sound like.

    6. Re:Diabl0 & Coder should be given medals by veganopolis · · Score: 1

      This isn't about life or death. This is about securing your systems so that intruders stop causing your machine to share its resources.

      You shouldn't compare life/death to a computer virus. Those are two completely different issues. Would you rather someone be put to death for stealing a loaf of bread or just have to pay for the bread? The punishment has to fit the crime.

      And in this case, these guys drew attention to the inability of Microsoft to clean up their act. How is that criminal?

    7. Re:Diabl0 & Coder should be given medals by Hosiah · · Score: 1

      Hee hee ! Haw ! It worked on me, I switched to Linux! Damn, I've been played!

    8. Re:Diabl0 & Coder should be given medals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Diabl0 & Coder should be given medals ... they force people to build more secure systems

      They should set fire to your house too, to force you to build a more fireproof house.

      What a dumbass.

    9. Re:Diabl0 & Coder should be given medals by Your+Average+Joe · · Score: 1

      The builder did not say my house was fireproof. Microsoft claims to make a sable secure os. Remember Windows NT was c2 secure...

      --
      Your Average Joe
    10. Re:Diabl0 & Coder should be given medals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You shouldn't compare life/death to a computer virus. Those are two completely different issues."

      Oh really? Shouldn't I? Do you really think that there aren't computer networks in the world and on an internet/intranet that hold lives in the balance?

      What about real-time monitoring hardware for construction sites or other endeavours such as oil drilling or coal mining that submit data back to a central computer over the internet in order to keep the workers' lives safe?

      Or maybe a network in a hospital that keeps patients on life support or gives updated vital statistics of their patients over the local intranet? What if (and it is, quite clearly, a VERY POSSIBLE what if) a worm or virus is introduced into the network by crackers who "aren't doing any harm"?

      Maybe we can go to something where there isn't quite as much in the immediate balance. You do realise that parts of Washington, D.C.'s internal network were taken down by this very worm? If the worst-case scenario comes around (and with each successful worm/virus released into the wild, it becomes much closer) and one of these crackers gains access to confidential information on citizens of any country, do you think that this couldn't cost thousands of peoples' livelyhoods, if not lives themselves?

      Still too unrealistic? Let's get down to an everyday business, maybe a bank, that has their 5000+ PC network connected to the internet. When a worm or virus comes along and infects the network and either steals information on their customers or simply brings down the network, stopping vital transactions including bill payment or medications, who is to be held accountable? The banking company because they offer a service to their customers that some criminals choose to abuse? I sincerely hope not.

      These are criminals. I don't care if they're "fighting the good fight" and attacking Microsoft, since they clearly attacked many other organizations not just MS. Just because you have a prejudice for a successful company with an unscrupulous history DOES NOT give you the right to dismiss these acts as anything less than criminal acts with criminal intent.

      Your argument is the same one as a person convicted of homicide makes with his statement of 'revenge'. That's not legal, it's not moral, it's dangerous, and it's not civilised by any means.

      Stop picking and choosing what crimes you would like to be ignored or addressed in a different light because of a personal prejudice.

    11. Re:Diabl0 & Coder should be given medals by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      Do you think Microsoft would release such patches when there would not be people that would write a worm to exploit the vulnerability?
      I don't think so. They would just leave the system open to attack by lower-profile hackers and those who gave anxious remarks about that would be sent away with "it is no longer a maintained operating system, please spend money again to buy our new product".

      Large-scale attacks are what keeps commercial software vendor's attention to the problem alive.

    12. Re:Diabl0 & Coder should be given medals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The builder did not say my house was fireproof. Microsoft claims to make a sable[sic] secure os.

      So does Linus and his colleagues. Funny, they put out patches too. I guess they're just as much a bunch of liars as everyone else.

      Sable's a nice color for OSes, but I prefer mine in burgundy.

  58. Funny Logic ... by joelsanda · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How is this wrong? People like this are keeping software developers on their toes. I say good on them...

    Couldn't you make the same case for people shooting cops or driving drunk? In the first case it will spur body armor manufacturers to create more effective armor. In the later it may lead to safer cars?

    --
    The Luddites were ahead of their time.
    1. Re:Funny Logic ... by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Strangely, many of the "saves" that body armour has had over the years has been in car accidents where it acted almost like an exoskeleton for the person wearing it, protecting against steering wheels, direcctional forces, etc.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    2. Re:Funny Logic ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You miss the point. Shooting cops is a good thing....

    3. Re:Funny Logic ... by cdn-programmer · · Score: 1

      As a matter of fact it has actually done both. Cars are far better designed now and cops are far more concious of the risks inherant in their jobs.

      Deal with reality or reality will deal with you!

  59. Easy targets missed by supra · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was reading a dated (2004) article comparing security on Windows and Linux. In it, they point out that Windows is not on the Top-50 list of highest uptimes. I recently visited the list (http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html) and noticed that Windows does indeed have a few entries.
    But, no Windows machine should have an uptime of more than ~6 months as all MS updates require a reboot. And the Netcraft list contained Win2k machines w/ 4+ yrs uptime! That means they should be ripe for the picking, right?
    Directly-accessible web servers that haven't been patched.
    Any reason these aren't hit?

    --
    On a computer or under a hood.
    1. Re:Easy targets missed by germanStefan · · Score: 2, Informative

      A firewall only allowing port 21 and port 80 will obsolete viruses for windows file sharing and uPnP like this last one...

    2. Re:Easy targets missed by supra · · Score: 1

      That's certainly true for this particular vulnerability.
      But in the last 4 years IIS has had its share of critical vulnerabilities.

      --
      On a computer or under a hood.
    3. Re:Easy targets missed by cnettel · · Score: 1

      But it's possible to shoehorn a IIS patch in without a complete OS reboot. Not always, but generally it is. The PnP service was not so simple.

    4. Re:Easy targets missed by germanStefan · · Score: 1

      heh it sure has...thats why I wont ever host anything on IIS boxen...good old apache for me

  60. From the eWeek update... by tktk · · Score: 3, Funny
    ... it includes the use of a very specific, high-priority subject line to make sure the mail is read by the senior executives.

    Damn, now I want to know what that subject line says...

    1. Re:From the eWeek update... by Fung_Koo · · Score: 1
      ... it includes the use of a very specific, high-priority subject line to make sure the mail is read by the senior executives.

      Damn, now I want to know what that subject line says...

      My guess would be "URGENT" or for the highest-priority, it might be "URGENT!!!"
      --
      It must be the power of NEGITIVE IONS!!
    2. Re:From the eWeek update... by zipwow · · Score: 1

      Somebody's got to start the speculation:

      How about:

      $$$$$

      or maybe:

      $DisturbanceInTheForce

      Or even:

      [Unimatrix01]

      --
      I don't know which is more depressing, that 2/3 didn't care enough to vote, or that 1/2 of those that did are crazy.
    3. Re:From the eWeek update... by iphayd · · Score: 1

      I have pictures of you and your "wife" in the Caymans. He'll be pissed if they get out.

    4. Re:From the eWeek update... by Hosiah · · Score: 1
      Lesse here, what brilliant piece of bait would get a senior executive to click every time? There's so MANY weaknesses in the suit-wearing mentality to exploit, this is SO not a brain-teaser!

      (gullibility)
      "Security patch from HQ, please install."

      (ego-appeal)
      "Your induction into the executive hall of fame"

      (lust)
      "Free nekkid girly picks!"

      (greed)
      "Our stock just split, see chart for your current 401K status."

      The list goes on and on...

    5. Re:From the eWeek update... by ColdForged · · Score: 1
      ... it includes the use of a very specific, high-priority subject line to make sure the mail is read by the senior executives.

      Damn, now I want to know what that subject line says...

      "Surprise your woman" would be my guess.
      --

      -"I seem to be having tremendous difficulty with my lifestyle." - Arthur Dent

  61. The Worm Author Prison Haiku Blues by deathcow · · Score: 2, Funny

    my progeny worm
    set loose to exploit your holes
    mine left for inmates

  62. very specific, high-priority subject line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The "Executive e-mail" is a key part of the response process, and it includes the use of a very specific, high-priority subject line to make sure the mail is read by the senior executives.

    Unfortunately for Microsoft, and fortunately for us, that very specific, high priority subject line has been leaked:

    Subject: 0H! fuX0R!! w3 g0t pWN3D!!!!11zored
  63. Nana Mous - get it??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a-nonymous. eh. forget it.

  64. nice! by nazsco · · Score: 1

    > E-mail blasts were sent with links to the incident page, patch download locations and other mitigation guidance.

    nice strategy! now people will get used to install binaries from spam links!

  65. Uhhh, what gave you that idea? by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Informative

    #1, most countries have laws against hacking/viruses/etc. Hence the reason they are being prosecuted locally. They broke a law in their country so it'll be handled there. However #2, law enforcement around the globe cooperates. We don't want criminals to be able to escape prosecution simply be conducting crimes across national lines, or fleeing to another country.

    So, what probably happened here is what happens all the time, the FBI had evidence that one of the authors was Moroccan so they got a hold of Moroccan police and gave them the information they had. Moroccan police investigated and have now arrested a suspect.

    I fail to see the problem here.

  66. Asking for trouble... by doorbot.com · · Score: 1
    FTA:
    By midday, senior executives including Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates and CEO Steve Ballmer were notified. The "Executive e-mail" is a key part of the response process, and it includes the use of a very specific, high-priority subject line to make sure the mail is read by the senior executives.


    So how long until this special subject line is either released and/or "bruteforced"?
    1. Re:Asking for trouble... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      So how long until this special subject line is either released and/or "bruteforced"?

      No kidding. What's wrong with a mail rule that says "if message is PGP-signed by the security team, put in folder 'READ_NOW!' and play 'ALERT_SIREN.WAV'". Seems a lot less prone to accidents or abuse.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    2. Re:Asking for trouble... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Research has shown that if you really want to encourage a recipient to open an email, the best subject line is simply "ILOVEYOU".

      You can then include an executive summary of the situation in an attachment called "LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.TXT.vbs".

  67. Boy am I glad... by DocRubyIsGay · · Score: 0

    ...that I am not gay like RocRuby.

    --
    make install -not war is the GAYEST sig ever!
  68. Re:Slashdot Worm Pic reminds me of.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then you should really go and deflate her now.

  69. Re:Morocco and Turkey, eh? by cpghost · · Score: 4, Informative

    Turkey and Morocco are amongst America's most trusted allies. Turkey is member of NATO, and Morocco was granted by the US the status of most important ally outside NATO, and we have a free trade agreement with Morocco as well.

    Oh, and btw., America's oldest friendship treaty (non broken) with a foreign nation was with... right: Morocco. Signed on our side by Thomas Jefferson himself.

    --
    cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  70. Re:It's Windows by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I know it's a lost cause even on /. anymore, but the Windows OS is the problem. These are children who are writing these things.

    Blame is not a zero sum game. Windows is one of the problems. A child who writes worms is another.

  71. Re:It's Windows by TedTschopp · · Score: 1

    They also then probably went and tried to steal the from the citizens who went to help the king. That was the real big problem. If you notice in the stories, money exchanged hands. They were not pointing out security problems, they were thieves.

    --
    Fantasy remains a human right; we make in our measure and in our derivative mode... -- JRR Tolkien
  72. Re:It's Windows by Compholio · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Pointing at the emperor and throwing rocks at his balls are two very different things. They could of just pointed. They went the rocks at balls path.

    Have you ever known an emperor to respond to the "oh, you made a mistake" approach? Or even recognize that a mistake has been made without a few rocks thrown at their balls? Plenty of people, security experts and script kiddies alike, have been warning with the "pointing" method for a long time. Absolutely no-one notices until the emperor takes a few rocks to the balls. Disclaimer: I disagree with such treatment on principle but can see why someone would take such an approach.

  73. you missed a part... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no way to combat that sort of attack, apart from not ever having bugs, ever. Which is unrealistic, and unattainable... even in Linux

  74. the obligatory conspiracy teory by nazsco · · Score: 1

    1. hijack major media corporation with upcoming worm
    2. make the word that only an old version is affected.
    3. make that media corporation, and lot of its viewers, buys windows XP and stop using 2000. first profit
    4. ???
    5. profit, probably.

  75. So who is wrong? by Skiron · · Score: 0, Troll

    I still don't understand how MS get off being the innocent party here. I mean...

    1. Re:So who is wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe because of there EULA that you have to agree to before installing it...

  76. Re:Light sentences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amen to that, brother.

  77. Real missing step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    • PROFIT!!1
  78. Here's a lesson for all you future criminals by unfortunateson · · Score: 1

    Don't e-mail your crimes.

    That's why we can't find Osama.

    --
    Design for Use, not Construction!
    1. Re:Here's a lesson for all you future criminals by cpghost · · Score: 1

      Don't e-mail your crimes. That's why we can't find Osama.

      You may be actually right. The reason for this is that we're relying heavily on ElInt (electronic intelligence) and are rather poor on HumInt; esp. in countries where Osama could be hiding.

      As long as people consistently avoid using electronic equipment, including phones, the net, or wiring money through the banking system,... and avoid basic mistakes in human interactions, they are unlikely to get caught any soon.

      Then again, would would like to live like that? Totally cut off from The Matrix ^W^W^Wcivilization?

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  79. The homeland security card by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Now that they have played that hand, the kids are screwed..

    They dont even have 'normal' rights as an accused now.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:The homeland security card by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Now that they have played that hand, the kids are screwed.

      Gosh, you're right. Just think of the children!

      These poor, foreign waifs, so abused by our domestic nazi security apparatus. Oh wait... 18 and 21 ("kids?") and entirely subject to the laws and law enforcement in their own countries. Breaking any law in Morocco or Turkey is a bad, bad trip for the bad guys. Of course, living there, they would know that. They'd have it easier if they had been arrested and prosecuted by authorities in the US.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  80. So what's wtih CNN by matt_morgan · · Score: 1

    What I want to know is, why doesn't CNN patch? Maybe there's a good reason, but I want to know what it is.

    I know a guy who works at the NYTImes. Their laptops are a mess--users have admin control, etc. They get hit with everything.

    1. Re:So what's wtih CNN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I can answer that one. It's the same reason why change management is becoming increasingly rare on every project I go to: it's inconvenient...in the short term.

    2. Re:So what's wtih CNN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      We patch, with our own SUS server even. Then WSUS came out. Our Windows guy installed it and started sucking down the patches and left for the weekend. When he came back on Monday the server's disk had filled up with every language of every patch blah blah over 40 GB of shit. Half of our machines were already compromised by two Monday mornings ago. So lots of our users didn't get the patches. Now we are getting hit with random root kits on all of these w2k machines.. oh the fun.

    3. Re:So what's wtih CNN by rossz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because installing a Windoze patch is risky business. They have a nasty habit of breaking important things. Good IT departments will test the crap out of a patch before rolling it out to several hundred desktops.

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    4. Re:So what's wtih CNN by ArtStone · · Score: 1

      CNN is owned by the same company (Time Warner) that owns AOL. Is that helpful?

      --
      Final 2006 "Proof of Global Warming" US Hurricane Count -> 0
  81. Re:It's Windows by chanceH · · Score: 1

    just remember: when your balls tingle, that means somebody is talking about them!

  82. it's not windows by circletimessquare · · Score: 1, Interesting

    it's exposure

    if some linux desktop flavor were as widely popular as windows, do you honestly think it would be any different with a new wonder worm every year?

    you linux zealots are honestly going to tell me that some badly written linux app that people widely adapt isn't going to be fodder for these guys as well if the application and the os had as much exposure as windows?

    it's a very simple formula: take a bunch of coders working on a lot of code, and presto changeo: holes. it's not like linux programmers are omnipotent and windows coders are drunk: people are people, no one is perfect, sh*t happens. the only deciding factor is how much interest there is in finding and exploiting those holes. if linux were up at bat instead of microsoft in the popularity contest, linux would be striking out just as much as microsoft.

    so what's the real lessons for us?:

    1. you need an ECOSYSTEM of os's out there. not one big borg state of 99.999% market penetration. in such a world, truly, one kid in his parent's basement can take down the entire world. what you need is something like 25% linux, 25% bsd, 25% windows, 25% mac, or whatever.

    2. don't celebrate that microsoft is getting hammered with worms, you should WORRY. because microsoft is getting good at fighting these worms back. look at the difference in the response to zotob as compared to sasser or code red. does the linux world have a similar muscular attack response system? additionally, what happens is that over time, because of it's exposure, microsoft actually gets pretty darn well patched from all of the really scary expoits out there, and all of the exposure begins to WORK for microsoft sales pr: "well we've been exposed to a powerful searchlight over the last few years and all of the really scary holes have been found... if you go with our competitors, who don't have nearly as much exposure to exploit exploration, who knows what nasty things someone might find in that os."

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:it's not windows by chromatic · · Score: 1

      How odd that your second paragraph claims that "exposure" is the predictor of vulnerability but your third paragraph says that the vulnerable Linux application is "badly written".

      Might there be some correlation between the quality of an application and its vulnerability? If so, is it possible that a popular application of high quality might have fewer exploits than a less popular application of lower quality?

      Everyone else in my neighborhood can tie their doors closed with bits of twine and clothesline at night and pretend that breakins happen because nine out of ten people on the street all use knots instead of locks to keep burglars out, but I'll stick with my deadbolt and not succumb to the fantasy that popularity is the primary indicator of vulnerability.

    2. Re:it's not windows by scatters · · Score: 1

      Most LINUX users are not logged in as root, because unlike Windows, you don't have to be for the operating system to actually work - this reduces the exposure and impact of virii.

      Secondly, while Microsoft may be getting better at responding to virus outbreaks, they're not getting better at preventing them. Because this would require a complete security audit on their millions of lines of code (the OpenBSD guys had the right idea), and would affect the deployment schedule of the next feature rich, security poor product.

      I'm a Windows on the desktop user for convenience, but I'm amazed by the regularity at which I have to install critical patches. It's a bloody joke. Microsoft would rather continue to band-aid the problem, rather than fixing the undelying one.

      --
      A One that isn't cold, is scarcely a One at all.
    3. Re:it's not windows by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 1

      Besides the fact that Unix variants are inherently more secure than Windows, the fact that *nix coders have productive things to do besides writing worms, and that most hackers hate M$ for being so, well, $, I really don't see why Linux isn't hacked as much as Windows.

      --
      All your base are belong to Wii.
    4. Re:it's not windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, genius, the solution is to NOT PUT SECURITY HOLES IN SOFTWARE. Apparently, the IT industry has given up even trying. Sure, put some idiot kids in jail. THIS DOES NOT SOLVE THE PROBLEM.

      Companies like Microsoft should be ashamed of themselves. They shouldn't even be in business, putting out garbage and then having the nerve to charge money for it.

      I mean, this "patch" business is pretty sad. Somebody (who isn't even on Microsoft's payroll) probably pointed out this bug to Microsoft, and then they patched it AFTER the code was released. What? You mean it's SO HARD to audit your own freakin' code? Why couldn't they fix the problem BEFORE the code was released? Why do the users have to be Microsoft's guinea pigs and unpaid auditors?

      Actually, it doesn't matter if it's open source, closed source, shared source, or public domain. Incompetent software authors need to be held responsible for the bugs they put in their code. Patches are not a solution, they are an admission of failure. At least with open source I don't have to **pay money** for the crap.

      I don't have any problem putting these idiots in jail. I just wish the Microsoft coders that ENABLED THEM were thrown in next to them.

      And before somebody compares it to terrorism or breaking into homes or whatever other BS you think of, we're talking about NETWORK SECURITY. Finite sequence of data in, finite sequence out. It is possible to make *secure* software that has predictable behavior in this scenario.

    5. Re:it's not windows by Gyarados · · Score: 1
      if some linux desktop flavor were as widely popular as windows, do you honestly think it would be any different with a new wonder worm every year?

      Yes

      you linux zealots are honestly going to tell me that some badly written linux app that people widely adapt isn't going to be fodder for these guys as well if the application and the os had as much exposure as windows?

      As far as I'm aware, there is no popular software for Linux which is as poorly developed as Microsoft's software. Additionally, open source operating systems employ a variety of methods to boost security, most of which are enforced by their kernels.

      if linux were up at bat instead of microsoft in the popularity contest, linux would be striking out just as much as microsoft.

      According to Netcraft, Microsoft have only 20.43% of the Web server market share as of August 2005. Can you recall there recently being any worm capable of compromising the dominant non-Windows servers?

      does the linux world have a similar muscular attack response system?
      1. I wouldn't call Microsoft's response to the worms exploiting the MS05-039 bug "muscular". Judging from the eWeek article, it seemed desperate and entirely improvised. I think Microsoft's actions reveal their awareness of the embarrassing fact that their software is primarily developed for, and used by the under-trained and inexperienced.
      2. Patches for security vulnerabilities discovered in open source software are generally created and released much faster than Microsoft.
      3. Open source communities properly educate their users about computer security, which helps prevent computers administrated by such users from being compromised.
      4. Open source software has sensible default settings, which helps prevent the host computer from being compromised.
      additionally, what happens is that over time, because of it's exposure, microsoft actually gets pretty darn well patched from all of the really scary expoits out there

      Unfortunately, Microsoft's software designers and engineers just create more vulnerabilities due to their world-famous stupidity.

    6. Re:it's not windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Unfortunately, Microsoft's software designers and engineers just create more vulnerabilities due to their world-famous stupidity.

      What like soo stupid that the guy in charge of Microsoft is the richest GUY in the world?

    7. Re:it's not windows by Hosiah · · Score: 1
      if some linux desktop flavor were as widely popular as windows, do you honestly think it would be any different with a new wonder worm every year?

      *Gr-oa-a-an!!!* Not you again! Don't you *ever* go away?

      Windows is only about 20 short years old. Linux is based on Unix, which is much older. And no, back when Unix was the predominant system and Windows wasn't even a twinkle in Bill Gates' eye, virus attacks were almost unheard-of. Security exploits DID happen, but they didn't cream right through the system like they do on Windows systems today. By the way, MacIntosh had it's own share of massive popularity before Windows got rolling, and Mac attacks were few and far between as well.

      OK, hypothetically, say the entire planet uses Linux, and 18-year-old hackers get jiggy trying to infect Linux machines. Here's the barriers to that:

      (a) Open Source = the solution is in our own hands, instead of waiting helplessly to depend on the skill of a proprietary company which would really rather sell you a new system than fix the one you just bought.
      (b) There's some 1000 different flavors of Linux - are you telling me that everybody would use the same kind? No, and seeing how hard it is to get a little video game to be cross-distribution-compatible, I shudder to think what you'd have to go through to do it with a virus. I can hear it now: "The virus only affected Red Hat systems, since it was an .rpm file and no .apt or .tgz release was made."
      (c) Ever tried to install a program you *want* on a Linux machine? That can be a hassle, and sometimes even impossible, even running as root. Dependencies, architecture, permissions, conflicts between versions...people like you are always carping about how hard Linux is on your widdle fingers, remember? Hence, that many fewer 18-year-old coders will be able to cope.

  83. Re:It's Windows by TexMachina · · Score: 1

    I suppose the "biggest kid on the block" argument is irrelevant at /. but just for grins I'll throw it out there.

    If 90% or more of the world's computer systems ran on any other single OS, it would be just as susceptible and just as targeted as Windows.

  84. Re:It's Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought you were talking about Nike until you mentioned shirts...

  85. Re:It's Windows by shmlco · · Score: 1
    "Should you be jailed for "merely" demonstrating this weakness?"

    Yes, because apparently you were also doing it to steal the wallets located inside said clothes.

    --
    Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
  86. A fitting punishment for worm creators- by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    would be to send them to bunk with Novak and Rove in Gitmo.

    I'm not sure who that would punish, but it would make me happy.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  87. Re:Morocco and Turkey, eh? by Khalid · · Score: 1

    Very informed post indeed !

    Morocco entry in Wikipedia : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morocco, for those who want to know about the first country to have recognized the US :)

  88. Interesting comment in the blow-by-blow by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    "The affected Windows 2000 operating system is already out of mainstream support and is not considered a consumer operating system."

    Really ... guess I'd better tell my uninfected Win98 PC to roll over and play dead then, cause King Bill declared it is no longer among the living.

    Strange, it works just fine ..

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  89. Third World Countries? by soupdevil · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The USA, proud member of the first world, is in the top ten for executions with such exemplary second world nations as Belarus and China.

    1. Re:Third World Countries? by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      The USA, proud member of the first world, is in the top ten for executions with such exemplary second world nations as Belarus and China.

      After fair trials, and years of appeals.

      Also, by the way, we don't execute virus writers...

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    2. Re:Third World Countries? by Sabriel · · Score: 1
      The USA, proud member of the first world, is in the top ten for executions with such exemplary second world nations as Belarus and China.

      After fair trials, and years of appeals.

      (a) From a certain POV that's even scarier.
      (b) It doesn't guarantee innocents won't be - and they have been - executed.
      (c) "Fair" isn't how I'd describe some of the trials.
    3. Re:Third World Countries? by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      Oh, come now. It's not like court-appointed counsel actually needs to be awake to give adequate representation.

      I mean, if they had court-appointed counsel it means they were poor, and how innocent can a poor person accused of murder be?

  90. Re:It's a real shame - missing step by loraksus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Actually did that on a machine just yesterday after spending 2 hours cleaning out the viruses, spyware, porn dialers et al. Doesn't look exactly like ie, but close enough for these users...

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  91. Update: virus authors of Botox-virus caught by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 1

    The authors of the virus infecting Word documents go by the screen names of 'WordCraft' and 'Haxor', authorities said.

    Authorities expect soon to catch two more virus authors, codenamed 'D40C' and 'Pr0gr4mm012'. The virus for which they will be hunted down is not yet known, but authorities promise 'it will be a real boo-hoo threat'.

    --
    I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
  92. I take it you haven't been to http://LitePC.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NT

  93. Well... by game+kid · · Score: 1

    ...it's too bad Windows 2000 and XP SP1 don't have the Windows Firewall that stopped the worm from getting on my PC and others. My brother prefers '2000 (visual styles bug him for reasons unknown).

    That said...PWN3D!!1

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    1. Re:Well... by Mundocani · · Score: 1

      Your brother could simply consider disabling the Themes service and any other services he doesn't want in XP. Then the UI reverts to the plain old look of Windows 2000 with no shading or transparancy effects and their performance impact. Like many others however, he may have reasons beyond theming for not wanting to run XP.

    2. Re:Well... by Corrado · · Score: 1

      Just a side note about turning off the themeing in XP. It doesnt really work very well. I mean, yes you can make it look like 2000 on the surface but it screws up things like dialog boxes that expect to be Luna themed. I tried it when I first got XP but was forced to turn themes back on because of all the weirdness and not being able to click on certain buttons...

      --
      KangarooBox - We make IT simple!
    3. Re:Well... by ExKoopaTroopa · · Score: 1

      If you're getting "weirdness" you haven't turned off all the options. There's the desktop appearance but also the folder views and start menu to switch.
      But once you've done that it's just like 2k, no weirdness here (and I run a 2k box at work and xp with 2k look at home, so I'm exposed to them both everyday)

      --
      Don't Tell Me What I Can't Do!
  94. Additional Charges Pending by catdevnull · · Score: 1

    ....The FBI also announced that there are additional penalties for lame screen names and unimaginative naming conventions for their worms.

    Now, "Trogdor" --that's a good name! :-)

    --

    I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
  95. The FBI acts on its own most of the time. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1


    The FBI web site gives the impression that they are only there to help. However, the FBI acts on its own most of the time, I understand.

    A transition happened, and American citizens were not allowed to consider the issues.

  96. Re:It's Windows by ultranova · · Score: 1

    If 90% or more of the world's computer systems ran on any other single OS, it would be just as susceptible and just as targeted as Windows.

    I can see why it would be as targeted as Windows is nowadays, but why would it be as suspectible ? What would magically add countless holes to, say, Linux ?

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  97. Re:Screen Moniker by skahshah · · Score: 1

    We apparently forgot to advise you : our geography course has been updated. As you know, we use Google maps, and Europe isn't constituted of only the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland anymore.

  98. it already exists by overbom · · Score: 1

    It's called the "Good Times" virus

  99. Local prosecutions by merc · · Score: 1

    Both individuals will be subject to local prosecutions, the FBI said.

    Here's our chance to see if public flogging and amputated fingers deter hackers.

    --
    It's true no man is an island, but if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie 'em together, they make a good raft.
  100. WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They didnt steal anything from you. They could have, but they didnt. Instead you pulled your own head out of your ass, updated, so that someone with a real malicious intent couldnt use the same exploit.

  101. Re:It's Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are already applicable laws against grabbing strangers' clothes and ripping them. There are no laws against ripping one's own clothes in a way that those clothes then rip the clothes of every other person one meets, causing their clothes to rip other people's clothes, and so on.

    _I_ don't think that person SHOULD be exclusively responsible for all the ripped clothing. The manufacturer does bear some of the responsibility.

  102. Re:It's Windows by SeeTheLight · · Score: 1

    WINE?

  103. I thought... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ..."games" would be more appropriate.

  104. Isn't it obvious? by Captain+DaFt · · Score: 1

    The subject line says: "STOP SPAM NOW-Here's how"

    (No comments on the irony of my tagline, please.) };-)

    --
    The U.S. really needs an English to Wisdom dictionary.
  105. Re:Morocco and Turkey, eh? by Soporific · · Score: 1

    Very interesting, thanks. I'm going to have to remember that!

    ~S

  106. Virus writer business model by subl33t · · Score: 1

    1) release virus
    2) get arrested
    3) update resume
    4) get hired by security company
    5) profit!

  107. Re:It's Windows by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 1

    Not as susceptible, but possibly targeted. But then more bored kids would have things to do like optimizing their kernels and recompiling gentoo and whatnot, (I really have no idea what I am saying, but am about to install slackware linux anyway)

    --
    All your base are belong to Wii.
  108. So where's Mr Big? by FishandChips · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Where I live, "security experts" are always wheeled out at these moments to explain that the new viral assualt is the creation of organized criminal gangs headed by a supremely intelligent and resourceful Mr Big (who probably lives in a suite at the Ritz and never goes anywhere without a Yorkshire Terrier). Yet here we are again, with the alleged perps being a couple of no-name losers from nowhere. It'll be interesting to see what, if anything, they link to.

    --
    Las qué passoun
    tournoun pas maï
  109. Just for the record... by mrs+dogbreath · · Score: 1

    I caught this worm Yes I uninstalled Fedora 3 and replaced it with W2K (Boot time reduced by 1 minute, wireless card now works) Noticed extreme activity on the NIC, being a laptop I can see the LED. "Strange" Say I, "Flashing away like fu**, I wonder..." Sure there we are in services, ps/2 mouse service, do me a favour wtf is this bullshit! Identify, disable remove etc about 1 hour after infection. Yet I run SpyBot/ADWare blah blah blah they EVENTUALLY spot it (Tuesday, I got it last Sat) BUT Firewall: disabled 445 NOT 443, which looks the same when you KNOW what your looking at! I did read some stuff about uPnP last year and thought "What a ... for a lightbulb" This is Intel doing not m$! well okay I will go for wintel Anyway, no great harm done, thats being done by the undetected worms in all those SUN & Linux M/C between me and that GaySexPronUberMachine Everyone knows Linux is coded by irrate *nix programmers no longer required by SUN microsystems becuase stealing 386BSD was soooo 1990's

    1. Re:Just for the record... by Hosiah · · Score: 1

      Parts of it were almost coherent. Not bad, but your bot still needs work in the grammer and punctuation department, google "Markov Chain" for help...

    2. Re:Just for the record... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mi vot bis week 88jklm.

  110. idiocy by Smallest · · Score: 1

    sounds like sexual assault to me. have fun in jail.

    --
    I have discovered a truly remarkable proof which this margin is too small to contain.
    1. Re:idiocy by crimethinker · · Score: 1
      That was my entire point. Thank you for completely missing it.

      The fact the MS Windows is horribly insecure does not escuse the illegality of writing a virus or worm and unleashing it on the world at large. Others seemed to be arguing that it was really MS's fault. Sorry, no, but it's the fault of the criminal mainly.

      -paul

      --
      Pistol caliber is like religion: everyone has their favourite, and theirs is the only right choice.
  111. I find your lack of understanding disturbing,.. by Henry+Stern · · Score: 1

    As usual, I see a lot of highly-moderated "Insightful" comments discussing how these viruses are written just for the sake of writing them. These viruses and worms are used to build botnets that are used for DDoS, phishing and spamming. The authors of Zotob allegedly released over 200 variants of their worm to help numerous people build botnets.

    It's unfortunate that so much media attention is paid to the authors of the virus and so little paid to its consumers. They are the ones filling your e-mail box with advertisements for ClAIS and VÌAGRRA and asking for your SSN.

  112. Re:It's Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I for one welcome our new womens shirt ripper offers.

  113. Re:It's Windows by Hosiah · · Score: 1
    If 90% or more of the world's computer systems ran on any other single OS, it would be just as susceptible and just as targeted as Windows.

    A hush falls over the seance. There is a message fro you from the spirit world. It's "...re-e-ea-ad....th-e-e....pre-e-vio-ousssss....p o-o-osssstssssss......."

  114. ala Bart Simpson by jav1231 · · Score: 1

    I see the two writing on a chaulk board:
    I will NOT make Microsoft and those who use their products look stupid.
    I will NOT make Microsoft and those who use their products look stupid.
    I will NOT make Microsoft and those who use their products look stupid.
    I will NOT make Microsoft and those who use their products look stupid.
    I will NOT make Microsoft and those who use their products look stupid.

  115. Re:Informative link???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And can you be a bigger karma whore, TMM?

  116. Fantastic! by BulletMagnet · · Score: 1

    The CNN report I saw on this said these sleezebags also created the RBOT variant (which I'm guessing is an offshoot of of ZOTOB) and I hope these guys see some some serious jail time. My company got hit with RBOT.CDM variant which Trend didn't have a pattern for on Wednesday and entered via a laptop that hadn't been patched in a while that was placed someone's unsecured connection, and brought in the virus around our firewall. At least it caused OfficeScan to break on one of the downstream infectees and the end user was smart enugh to notice his Real Time Scanner icon turned red (which means something took it offline) and even smarter to call and ask about it. A quick investigation showed the Registry Editor and CMD prompt were suddenly inaccessable, but it's a ugly feeling to scan the file with the latest pattern and the Controlled Release pattern scan right over the file and not report anything. At that point, you rip all the downstream infectees off the network, call Trend and wait (WAY too long I might add) for them to send you their forensic toolkit, which you run on the infected machine and take the 65MB snapshot it writes out and FTP it them. They had a pattern fix (which they call a "bandage pattern") for us the next day along with a cleanup method. 15 infected machines later, you're done.

    I can honestly say being at ground zero for an undiscovered variant virus really sucks. For having done Windows Network Administration for 10+ years, I felt rather at a loss. It's all better now, and with the arrests made, I'd like to offer my choice in punishment for these dirtbags if they get convicted.

    I work for a large construction company and on some jobsites, it takes a while for for the sanitation crews to get around to pump out the Port-a-potties. I would suggest they farm these guys out to clean out some of these nasty johns ... with only a short straw and lung inhalation power.

    That'll learn 'em

    1. Re:Fantastic! by cdn-programmer · · Score: 1

      All you confirm is that scanners are not safe enough because they are in reaction mode.

      Also - I sort of doubt they got the real black hats who did this. Most likely they got some script kiddies. However - who knows. I kinda doubt whoever wrote this would be so dumb as to get caught. But if they were - then next time I suspect the black-hats will be smarter.

      You know its the white-hats that run more risk because when they point out the problem they do become a target. The black-hats are actually quite safe if they are smart and keep a low profile - or - if they are supported by an enemy goverment.

  117. I knew that. by game+kid · · Score: 1

    ...and I told him long before. He knows by now and probably thinks differently about that now too--I remember him saying that some months ago, so his opinions may have settled during shipping.

    Judging from the Zotob news, I'm extremely glad I stayed on XP, and didn't switch as he suggested when he brought a Windows 2000 CD at that time. I like jellybean Start buttons anyway. ;)

    Of course, if it was (disclaimer: I don't believe this, just think it may have been possible) Microsoft making the virus to get more "genuine" customers then I'll be extremely glad they are bankrupt, instead.

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  118. Easy anonymity by vspazv · · Score: 1

    Im surprized people doing things like this don't release their virus infections through unsecured wireless networks. Just drive around town till you find one and then send out the files. Would make it a hell of a lot harder to trace.

  119. My Fav line FTA by Sfing_ter · · Score: 1

    This is my favorite line from the freakin article...

    "Customers are more aware of the need to move into a maintenance mindset. Customers using Windows 2003 Server SP1 [Service Pack 1] weren't impacted by the vulnerability because of changes we made. This is best example of learning how to make product more resilient to attack and have it be secure by default."

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Emo Philips
  120. Only Mass Murders In Countryside... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    by Islamist fundamentalists. Otherwise Moroccans have little to fear in their "fledgling democracy".

    Every country with a Muslim majority is endangered by Islam fundamentalism. If moderate muslims don't speak out and don't get militant about their moderate viewpoints, the fundamentalists will drive/kill all moderate leaders.

    So where are the moderate Islamists? I keep hearing about them, but nothing from them. Don't they yet realize that, to preserve moderation, it may be necessary to pick up a gun? Or are they all cowards? I fear the latter.

  121. As someone... by ChePibe · · Score: 2, Informative

    As someone who just finished working at an embassy overseas and worked with FBI officials there, let me assure you - the local countries don't mind the help and technical assistance they receive from the LEGAT offices. Quite the opposite - LEGAT provides a great deal of training and equipment when needed, and acts as a liason with local police force.

    The LEGAT agents probably weren't the ones that made the actual bust, but they were likely there to coordinate it.

    Considering the damage this virus caused to US interests (businesses and citizens at home and abroad), I'd argue the US certainly had an interest in taking these guys out of commission.

    The tinfoil hat crowd can, and will, say what they want, but the FBI employees I've had the chance to work with are amazing people - honest, hard working, focused on their jobs, and quite frankly, underpaid for the risks they take. I'm just glad to hear that the guys were busted.

  122. Oh, I get it now... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    THERE ARE NO SUCH WORDS AS VIRII.

    Is that what you were looking for? I just had to have it YELLED at me to hear it right.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  123. Re:It's Windows by ultranova · · Score: 1

    WINE?

    Is it actually possible to get something installed and working properly under Wine ? I've pretty much given up on it ever being usefull, especially after realizing just how much time and effort was put into the graphical configuration program (which deprecates the old config file, meaning that if someone by some miracle actually got Wine working for his programs, it won't work anymore - oh, and it doesn't support all the options the config file did) and things like theming support !!! I mean, seriously, if you have an emulator, which doesn't run anything well, should you really worry about making it pretty ?!?

    Sorry to all the Wine makers who might be reading this, but your stuff just tastes bad and leaves me mad, just like vinegar usually does...

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  124. Boy am I glad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that I don't have to constantly apply patches that require reboots and break stuff because I'm too stupid to operate a grown up OS

  125. Shouldn't they... by zlogic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Shouldn't they arrest or at least fire the developers responsible for creating the vulnerability in the first place and thus making these viruses possible?
    It's like your house has a 2 metre hole in the wall because the builders forgot to close it. And you can't close it yourself because it's against the law to examine the house.

    1. Re:Shouldn't they... by cdn-programmer · · Score: 1

      Mod this up more. Very good point.

  126. Does the FBI prevent independence? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1


    I don't doubt what you say. It makes sense to me.

    However, the question is whether the FBI is, in some ways, actually influencing law enforcement and the law in other countries. That's what happens with the U.S. government's CIA agency; "working with other countries" meant "infiltrating the governments of other countries". Does the FBI operate by its own rules, but show the other government only what it wants the other government to know?

    In Brazil 40 years ago, U.S. government agencies "providing training" meant influencing the military to create a military dictatorship. Hidden actions of the U.S. government overthrew Brazil's government.

    Corruption of the Brazilian government by the CIA in Brazil is a strong present-day concern. O Globo, the place where the article was originally published, is the biggest media company in Brazil.

    The question is not what you see, but what is deliberately hidden from you.

    In actuality, it is very difficult to run any organization. Organizations that have a high degree of secrecy quickly become uncontrolled.

    U.S. Senator Frank Church investigated extreme corruption in the U.S. government's secret agencies. The agencies certainly never apologized; it must be assumed that nothing really changed.

    I'm guessing that you, like most American citizens, have never read about the corruption mentioned here, or the many other cases of extreme corruption of the U.S. government in influencing other countries. That's why you mentioned "tinfoil hats".

    --
    Trying to make one book explain all of life makes some people crazy enough to kill.

    1. Re:Does the FBI prevent independence? by ChePibe · · Score: 1

      Yes, I have read the Church report...

      "the question is whether the FBI is, in some ways, actually influencing law enforcement and the law in other countries."

      - The goal of an embassy overseas is to influence the policies of the host government and make them more friendly to those of the United States. There is nothing hidden or sinister about that. LEGAT offices focus on making local law enforcement more friendly to the US so we can expect help from them. They've had a lot of success in the past, and captured many people who have fled the US to other countries or damaged US interests overseas. If that means, say, giving Night Vision goggle or training equipment for free to a local police department and expecting a little help in return, so be it.

      "Does the FBI operate by its own rules, but show the other government only what it wants the other government to know? "

      - Does the US only tell other governments what we want them to know and hide what we don't want them to know? Yes. Other governments do that to us as well. It's called "classification". We practice it, as does anyone else. On a personal level - Does a married man disclose all of his ex-girlfriends and foibles to his in-laws immediately?

      "Corruption of the Brazilian government by the CIA in Brazil is a strong present-day concern."

      - The FBI is not the CIA. They are two agencies frequently cited as competitors and as being extremely unfriendly with each other. If you would like to discuss corruption caused by the FBI, then please cite appropriate information. The CIA and FBI operate very differently overseas. This is a smoke screen.

      "The question is not what you see, but what is deliberately hidden from you.

      In actuality, it is very difficult to run any organization. Organizations that have a high degree of secrecy quickly become uncontrolled."

      - As someone who has held a security clearence and been inside such an organization for the past three months, I would strongly beg to differ. Perhaps in the past, but you fail to notice that the Church Committee took place between 1975 and 1976. Lots of things change in 30 years, and there is much more oversight than before. It should also be noted that much of the information in the Rockeffeler report was voluntarily researched and collected by the CIA in a document titled "the family jewels".

      "I'm guessing that you, like most American citizens, have never read about the corruption mentioned here, or the many other cases of extreme corruption of the U.S. government in influencing other countries. That's why you mentioned "tinfoil hats". "

      - Well, frankly, that's incorrect. Not only have I read about it and studied it intensely (Intelligence is the focus of my undergraduate studies at the moment), I've worked in this environment.

      I know you think you're just talking to another dumb American, but I must beg to differ.

      (I apologize in advance for any spelling errors... haven't put my contacts in yet... can't see a thing ;-) )

  127. Blame the customer by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1
    That's funny and all, but on the serious side, the "blame the customer" strategy is a common theme in multi-level marketing scams in general, not just the M$ one.

    It works, especially now that so much has been done to mystify IT, that's why scammers use it. It's also a lot of bullshit on the technical side. Most of these M$ worms and M$ virii propagate without any user intervention at all. Many also affect patched machines. So the only mistake that the customers are making is using M$ products at all.

    A virus is only harmless data, unless your system is designed to run it on sight. If your application or operating system can't live securely in a networked environment then it shouldn't be using IP anyway. Blaming the customer won't change any of that, though it may keep people from considering quality of the software.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.