Slashdot Mirror


No Video iPod Coming?

Fuzzball963 writes "ThinkSecret is reporting that a video iPod is not going to be released on Oct.12th. Instead, the announcement will be an 80 GB update to the iPod, along with size improvements on the color models. The analysts seem to say that the video iPod is in development, but that lack of a licensing agreement between Apple and the studios has made it a no-go for now." From the article: "While a video-capable iPod remains in development, without the agreements nor infrastructure in place to deliver movies to customers through a store-like interface, Apple sees little value in releasing such an iPod at this time. Apple insiders have also said executives see consumers needing the capability to easily import the DVD movies they own to a usable format (similar to the encoding functionality provided for audio CDs with iTunes) in order for a video iPod to be truly successful. The complexity to date of accomplishing such a feat has meant only a minority of computer users have dabbled with watching full-length movies on their computer, with most of those having acquired the content through file sharing services."

221 comments

  1. What about by Phil1 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Music videos?

    --
    I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy
    1. Re:What about by hector_uk · · Score: 1

      this is not about music videos, seriously who cares about music videos they are just eye candy when your watching MTV or whatever. this is about full length films and apple wont come out with a video ipod untill two things happen, 1) they have a viable design, current players do not, it needs to have a good UI aka a scroll wheel and it needs a big enough screen, that or a regular ipod with video out and that can connect to an airport express to stream video like recent rumors have suggested, i wish i could play a dvd through my airport express, it would rule my world i could use my media g4 cube for something more usefull than a gloryed dvd/divx player.

    2. Re:What about by hool5400 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Music videos will be Apples foot in the door for any iTMS style movie distribution. But cinematic movies are a lot longer off simply owing to the fact that the customer base (that has the required bandwidth) is still a small market.

      That, and no-one wants to watch a movie on a shitty little screen.

      --

      Remember, it takes 42 muscles to frown and only 4 to pull the trigger of a sniper rifle.
    3. Re:What about by prell · · Score: 1
      Music videos?
      And what about commercials? People *love* commercials, and they wouldn't even be that big to download!
    4. Re:What about by rdoger6424 · · Score: 1

      Just download the super bowl commercials. They're the only commercials you'd want to download

      --
      "Hello 911? I just tried to toast some bread, and the toaster grew an arm and stabbed me in the face!"
    5. Re:What about by nwbvt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I doubt music videos have that great of a market either, considering not even MTV plays them anymore. I suspect the best candidate for this would be recorded TV shows, small enough in size that they can be easily stored on a hard drive player, short enough in length that they can watched casually, and you usually don't have the focus on visual effects (which, as you mention, will be less than impressive on a tiny screen).

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    6. Re:What about by LordSnooty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hello The Daily Show, this will be the first TV show get regular distribution in a Podcast-type manner.

    7. Re:What about by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm confused too! Aren't there already TONS of personal video players out there already? RCA Lyra? Cowon iAudio x5? What's the hold up?

      Most people simply are not interested in watching video on a 2" screen, that's all. Expecially when it means the battery life on the player goes down to a mere 1-2 hours.

    8. Re:What about by CajunLuke · · Score: 0

      Apple's waiting to do it right. Or so everybody says.

    9. Re:What about by kylie69 · · Score: 1

      can't imagine me watching videos on such a tiny screen

      --
      One man, one word.
    10. Re:What about by utnow · · Score: 1

      "That, and no-one wants to watch a movie on a shitty little screen."

      Except for the thousands upon thousands of people who've bought those handheld televisions to catch sports broadcasts and news.

  2. No Video iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Makes sense when they explain it but really if we all just wait a few days there will be no speculation =p

    1. Re:No Video iPod by Guspaz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I stand by the statements I've made the past two times that the iPod Video seemed on the cusp of release. Allow me to quote a post I made a few days ago:

      I think a previous post I've made still applies to this situation, and I'll reiterate the key points: Every time Apple hints they are about to make an announcement, the media always tells the public that it is undoubtedly going to be a video iPod. And every single time they have been wrong. Does this mean that this announcement is not a video iPod? No. I merely point out that screaming "OMG TEH VIDEO IPOD IS HERE!" every time apple prepares for an announcement is stupid.

      This nonsense has just proven my point; yet another Apple announcement, the media claims it can be nothing but the Video iPod, but now, well, not so much. Yes, the official announcement has yet to be made. But consider this; for years the media has been saying that announcements for the next iPod related product was a Video iPod. For years I've been saying they're full of shit. Every single time, I've been right and they've been wrong. Says something about the "experts" making the claims, doesn't it?

    2. Re:No Video iPod by Petey_Alchemist · · Score: 1

      This is not only a repost, but ThinkSecret's logic is flawed.

      Apple tends to use these type of events--and the "One more thing" line--to introduce a major product or make a major announcement. So, if we look what was announced at the last event--the Nano--we must assume that Apple thinks that what they are announcing is big enough to risk overshadowing the Nano.

      Considering some analysts are saying Apple may sell 5 million Nanos by the end of the Christmas season, we are faced with two possibilities.

      Either:
      A) Apple vastly underestimated the impact of the Nano, and mistakenly thought that a minor upgrade--like a 1/3 increase in the capacity of high end iPods--would be more well received than a whoppingly cool replacement for the best selling iPod, or
      B) Apple has something huge in the works--something so huge that it is worth drawing away attention from the minis.

      Now, I don't see it being a major product increase, because why Apple would spend all the time, energy, and publicity on what will be essentially a dead duck product considering the inevitable Intel switch is beyond me. Unless, of course, Apple is bringing Intel machines to the market way ahead of schedule...

      So I think it has to be a new iPod, one that will be targeted towards people who want more than a small capacity, compact listening device (the Nano). They're appealing to a different demographic with this. It has to be something with video, and I'm betting we're going to see a way to easily transfer movies, with a high rate of compression, to your Mac. That's the only thing major enough to be worth this--except for new Intel machines, or possibly an announcement that Apple has finally created workable X-ray specs.

      --Petey

  3. Why wait for Hollywood? by jack_call · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Last time I checked, iTunes Music Store had music videos. Put the video iPod on the market, let the movie folks see the potential just in music videos.

    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine. My sig is my best friend. It is my life.
    1. Re:Why wait for Hollywood? by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 2, Funny

      You know, my idea of a good time is watching a full length movie on a little postage stamp sized screen.

      --
      resigned
  4. Old New by somethinghollow · · Score: 1

    This was already posted in the comments of the "Video iPod Coming Soon" post the other day.

  5. What about? by Phil1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Home-made movies?

    --
    I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy
    1. Re:What about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Home-made movies?

      YOU SICK PORN-FREAKS, I don't want *anyone* to watch this stuff when sitting next to me on my way to work.

    2. Re:What about? by MouseR · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most phones allow you to play small movies. Some carriers now even sport TV channels on 3G phones.

      The much criticized ROKR phone is actually very nice (I own one). pigmy VGA camera but that's still 640x480 more pixels than an iPod can capture AND it records/play videos.

      Steve has got to open his eyes and release what the public wants ratter than wait for the industry to provide what they wished the public wants.

    3. Re:What about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok.. I can't believe I am being sucked into this sillyness, but here goes. Please understand that I think we have probably already nailed what is really going to be announced Wednesday, since every reasonable base has been covered. Inspired by the velvet curtains I want to add the following crazy and unrealistic fantasies:

      Some kind of camcorder with and ipod dock. The video goes straight to the ipod HD. It works as an audio recorder and digital camera too of course, hell, let's say it also works as a portable digital VCR.

      Alternatively, an ipod with a camera built in.

      A mac mini with a built in projector.

      A highly portable projector or display that connects to a video ipod (or computer). Is there such a thing as a high definition projector?

      Some kind of weird-ass head set or goggles to let allow you to actually see something when you play a movie from your ipod.

      Some kind of lap top-like device but smaller and simpler - maybe with a 6 or 8 inch display. Billed as a high end multimedia ipod and hand-held.

      Apple home media center with massive HD display, ipod dock and computer built in. Includes surround speakers, bluetooth remote, keyboard and pointing device.

      Apple is getting into the ISP and/or cable or satellite TV business. Perhaps pay-per-view movie service or Itunes store for sattelite TV, new software for using the mac as a tivo type system, all seamlessly integrated of course.

      The merger of PIXAR and Apple to yield a major studio, media producer and record label, maybe with the help of the other (Beatles) Apple.

      er... oh, oh..... I know..... its a waterproof floating G5 powerbook you can use in the bath, in fact, to deal with the cooling issues, you can ONLY use it in the bath. The great part is that it keeps the water nice and warm.

  6. Is the Video iPod worth the wait? by Dynamoo · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I have to question the whole buzz about the Video iPod, and indeed any other similar portable video player (such as those made by iRiver and others). It's an much small niche market than audio, because unlike music playback, video demands your full attention. You can't reasonably watch a video while out walking, jogging, riding a bike or working away at your desk. Plus, the small screens don't exactly do justice to most of the things you are watching.

    So, I think the lack of a Video iPod is no great loss. What Apple are missing out on is a decent iPod-style phone. According to The Register, the Motorola ROKR iTunes phone isn't shifting in any significant quantity. Perhaps if Apple and Motorola had come up with something more like the (admittedly flawed) Bang & Olufsen Serene then it would be a real seller. That's the kind of unified gadget there's a market for.. a good mobile/music player hybrid. B&O showed that it's possible. But Apple have either missed the boat on this one, or perhaps they do have something in development in-house.

    Really though.. if I want to watch a film while I'm away.. I stick a DVD in my laptop. That has a nice big screen and I've never run into DRM issues with that. Yet.

    --
    Never email donotemail@WeAreSpammers.com
    1. Re:Is the Video iPod worth the wait? by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Right now there is no significant demand , Of course the market can be made .
      I would love a portable video player if they a decent battery life , Laptops and current generation portable video devices simply are not that useful for long stays away from a power outlet , the screens I have seen are fine ( I tend not to mind as they are held rather close , in perspective they seem about as large as a normal TV at a good range ) though .

      Long haul flights , lazy days in the garden .,um work if you have your own office and can't use your main computer *cough*,bus trips , train journeys , passengers on a long drive and other things of this nature .

      I do believe there is a market , obviously so does apple and iRiver . the iRiver player would have been discontinued if it were not profitable .

      currently a niche market , given the right upgrades to the technology it could hit the big time .. also would be lovely if they had TV outs .

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    2. Re:Is the Video iPod worth the wait? by rm999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, but its not like it's going to cost them much to add the video. They have the screen, they have the harddrive and sound hardware/processing - all they need to add is a chip which (i am guessing) costs less than 20-30 dollars that can decompress video files. When they are charging 300-400 dollars, that isn't much.

      Normally you could use it just like your old ipod, but on long trips or airplane rides you could watch a movie or something. My friend had an iriver on our europe trip this summer, and it was so nice to be able to watch our favorite tv shows - especially after not watching any english tv for a month. Made my monochrome ipod mini seem dull in comparison. Plus his battery life was pretty comprable to mine.

    3. Re:Is the Video iPod worth the wait? by Kjella · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So, I think the lack of a Video iPod is no great loss. What Apple are missing out on is a decent iPod-style phone. According to The Register, the Motorola ROKR iTunes phone isn't shifting in any significant quantity.

      Up until the iPod nano, I would have disagreed. But now I agree. You already have the screen, input device and battery. Include a mic, radio antenna and basic SMS/MMS and you have a working phone that isn't too big. Just include a little bit of sane battery management (that is, not let the pod drain the phone beyond a certain threshold). With the relatively large battery for a phone they might even catch a niche market for people who want extra long life. In other words I'd much rather have an iPod with phone than a phone with iPod. The ROKR is going about it in a completely wrong way, at least to my tastes.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    4. Re:Is the Video iPod worth the wait? by Xarius · · Score: 1

      Include a mic, radio antenna and basic SMS/MMS and you have a working phone that isn't too big. Just include a little bit of sane battery management (that is, not let the pod drain the phone beyond a certain threshold).

      A keypad might be nice too, no?

      --
      C17H21NO4
    5. Re:Is the Video iPod worth the wait? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      rokrs problem is that it's a shitty mp3 player and a shitty phone - and horribly late.

      glue the nano to a razr and it's slightly better.

      ah well.. they should just write player programs for the major smartphone platforms..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    6. Re:Is the Video iPod worth the wait? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      A keypad might be nice too, no?

      I used to think that navigating thousands of songs would require one too. Scrolling my address book, scrolling my dictionary... I think it could work without, but I'd really have to test that and see. I don't think the asian market would mind at least, since they don't work with a-z anyway.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    7. Re:Is the Video iPod worth the wait? by wfberg · · Score: 1

      Plus, the small screens don't exactly do justice to most of the things you are watching.

      I find the Archos AV700's 7" screen quite bearable. Should be great for commuting to work in trains. Much like those portable DVD players (though I suspect those are mostly in use by kids in the backseats of cars).

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    8. Re:Is the Video iPod worth the wait? by kermitthefrog917 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the perfect media for portability like this has to be "The Family Guy"... or other TV comedy series... So what if the picture is small and not so perfect... A comedy series is all about whats said anyway. I've laughed just as hard at some crappy 32 MB episode with 320x240 resolution and bitrate worth next to nothing as a high quality dvd rip. id watch it when taking trains and public transport (except at night... as that just screams out "MUG ME")

      --
      I may be wrong but you're downright ugly!
    9. Re:Is the Video iPod worth the wait? by Zoidmann · · Score: 1

      I think it could work without [a keypad]

      Well, personally I use my mobile primarily for sms messages, so I might miss a keypad. Then again, if they can figure out a smarter way to type in messages, I wouldn't actually need the keypad anymore.

      It's my impression that sms is the main reason for the majority of users here to actually have a mobile. "Here" as in "Not USA, but a lot of places I have otherwise visited". I have never been in USA, so I don't know how it is there.

      Even my grandmother, who is in her seventies, know how to use sms messages. So it's not just a teen-thing btw. Yes, I think my grandmother is pretty cool :-)

    10. Re:Is the Video iPod worth the wait? by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      SMS isn't anywhere near as big in the US. People dont SMS much because most cellphone plans don't include an alottment of messages, and if they do, they charge you insane prices (10 cents per or something like that) if you go over, or send messages on a phone without an SMS plan.

      These days new plans usually come with SMS or an option to get unlimited SMS at a small premium, so usage might pick up in the future. It's very much seen here as a "kids" thing (which makes sense. 95% of the time if you see someone sending a text message, it's a teen)

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    11. Re:Is the Video iPod worth the wait? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      funny, I made the exact same comment the last time this story was posted, and was modded down for it. The arguments against me boiled down to the fact that a video iPod could be used to carry movies with you to plug into TVs to play, rather than watching on the small screen.

    12. Re:Is the Video iPod worth the wait? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      In the UK, SMS is incredibly popular and the standard rate is 10p (around 20) per text. Most plans do include some text messaging, but pre-pay ones don't and they are the ones most commonly used by the age group who does the most texting (teens).

      I don't think sending cost has as much to do with is as the fact that you have to pay to receive texts on a US phone (correct me if I'm wrong here). I would get really irritated by friends texting me if I had to pay to receive their messages. At least with a normal mobile 'phone call, you get caller ID to tell you if you want to pick up and pay - with SMS there is no option. Over here, you only every pay to receive SMS or mobile calls if you are out of the country at the time.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    13. Re:Is the Video iPod worth the wait? by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the RF modulator and screwdriver terminals, let ALONE the slide switch to select channel 2 or 3, would make it a big bulky package, unlike the sleek modern 'Industrial Design' that gets such hype.

      --
      resigned
    14. Re:Is the Video iPod worth the wait? by notthe9 · · Score: 1

      Some US companies charge only to send, not receive. AT&T did when I was with them, and I think Cingular does it that way. T-Mobile charges you either way, but you don't get charged if you don't read the message.

    15. Re:Is the Video iPod worth the wait? by cgenman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Remember, this is Apple. They're not going to release something that's just "better than nothing." If they're going to release a video iPod, they're going to solve the distribution problems, make encoding trivial, give it an easy interface, and mark it way up. It will be usable by one hand, you will be able to watch and do the dishes at the same time, and it will be revolutionary in other ways that we can't even think of right now. It will also be very, very thin and utterly sexy. Did I mention it would be really expensive?

      Unlike MP3's, video files come as Divx, WMV, Real, MPEG2, MPEG4, and a host of others. Even the audio encoding varies pretty widely. That means a strong general purpose chip, which drives prices much higher and battery life down. And, let's not forget, while Apple's stuff is amazingly well designed from an aesthetic standpoint, they always have first-gen problems. I wouldn't be surprised if an undertaking like this was suffering from those behind-the-scenes.

      But an iPhone would be exactly the sort of killer that we all need. Imagine being able to sync your phone to your desktop as easily as getting music onto your iPod. Or e-mailing a photograph in two clicks instead of twenty. Or being able to talk on the phone while still looking up a number. Or any one of a host of other major problems with phones these days. A grid computing friend of mine just bought a phone the other day, and it took the two of us about 15 minutes to figure out how to take a picture.

      Motorola and Nokia's phone interfaces could use a LOT of help. I'm guessing that's why the itunes phone isn't taking off: It really lacks what apple is selling. It isn't the ability to play MP3's, it's the clarity and simplicity of the interface. Why would anyone want a phone that plays MP3's if it takes 10 minutes of frustration to play anything?

    16. Re:Is the Video iPod worth the wait? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called the samsung i730 with pocketmusic player. However, the ipod beats it with capacity. The samsung is limited by what SD card you put in it (wishes for a 40g SD card...).

    17. Re:Is the Video iPod worth the wait? by shmlco · · Score: 1
      "It's an much small niche market than audio, because unlike music playback, video demands your full attention."

      How many people travel, and would like a video player, but don't want yet another device/charger in addition to their notebook, mp3 player, and cell phone? (ME!)

      How many people work jobs where nothing is happening at two in the morning and you're stuck there? How many people commute and ride subways, trains, buses, or ferries to work each day? How many people wait in lobbies for appointments? How many parents wait for kids to get done with soccer practice? How many would those same parents buy so their kids won't drive them crazy on trips?

      And there are quite a few notebooks out there (my C400, for example) that don't have DVD drives, or, if they do, barely have the power to run a couple of hours of video with the DVD constantly spinning...

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    18. Re:Is the Video iPod worth the wait? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an much small niche market than audio, because unlike music playback, video demands your full attention.

      Clearly you are not aware of the quality of American television.

    19. Re:Is the Video iPod worth the wait? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      huh?

    20. Re:Is the Video iPod worth the wait? by the+argonaut · · Score: 1

      Problem easily solved: don't put them in the iPod itself. have an adapter that plugs into the dock connector (or something like that) to plug into the TV. Yeah, it's one more thing to carry around, but it's probably about the best solution you're going to get.

      That being said, I don't think it's gonna be a video iPod. And I don't really care either way.

      --
      fuck you.
    21. Re:Is the Video iPod worth the wait? by glowworm · · Score: 1

      "In other words I'd much rather have an iPod with phone than a phone with iPod."

      A very valid argument. I had never considered this paradigm before, but now as I look at my use of a mobile phone I see it is 98% incoming calls with 1.5% outgoing to voice dialled numbers like my wife and work (for which I use voice dialling with voice synthesis feedback [DIAL-WORK {do you want to call work?} YES]) and maybe 0.5% of calls to first-time numbers. (And I usually say these numbers into my Bluetooth headset anyway with the same Recognition and Synthesis interface [DIAL-NUMBER-FOUR-ONE-ONE {do you want to dial four one one} YES].)

      Thinking about it in depth I have never actually tapped numbers into my phone unless I was doing telephone banking in an emergency, therefore for me the argument that using a rotary dial on an iPod like phone is a bit redundant.

      To all the neigh-sayers who read this... Make the interface voice based (Numbers 1-9, Letters A-Z for SMS, a few user defined custom phrases like Wife & Work plus Yes/No), add a little synthesised feedback, put a "recognise this phrase switch" on the device and microphone/headphone lead so I can easily dial. Basically make it an iPod primarily. Just add some phone-like functions.

      My current phone is a HTC magician if you were wondering how this was possible now.

      --
      Orationem pulchram non habens, scribo ista linea in lingua Latina
    22. Re:Is the Video iPod worth the wait? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You people and your iPods. Welcome to four years ago. Waiting for a video iPod? Suckers. I have been using my Archos AV340 since it was released (and other Archos products before that). Combine that with a subscription to Netflix (or something similar) and there are no probs taking movies with you wherever you go, whenever you need them. You think playing DVDs on a laptop is nice? How many movies can your laptop play in a row? You guys keep buying your iPod fashion accesories. I'll stick with something that does what I want, without mandatory software requirements. Don't forget to buy matching clothes at The Gap!! Rock on Pink Boys!!

  7. Copying your legally-owned DVDs... by Trollificus · · Score: 5, Interesting
    ...to an mpeg/divx/whatever format isn't as difficult as they make it sound. I currently use Smartripper to rip the .vob files and separate my audio and video tracks, and DVDx to encode the audio to mp3 and video to DivX and package it all up in a nice .avi container.

    Granted, it is not as easy as ripping a CD, but if anyone can streamline this into a single-step process(to the end-user anyway), it would be Apple.

    --

    "People should be allowed to keep midgets as pets."
    - Gov. Jesse Ventura

    1. Re:Copying your legally-owned DVDs... by roskakori · · Score: 3, Informative
      I currently use Smartripper to rip the .vob files and separate my audio and video tracks, and DVDx to encode the audio to mp3 and video to DivX and package it all up in a nice .avi container.
      And for us Mac heads, there is HandBrake.
    2. Re:Copying your legally-owned DVDs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I really can't see the MPAA sitting still whilst Apple does this, given that they've gone after makers of high end DVD jukeboxes in the past. Music is different; there's established cases showing that you have the right to rip your music (at least in the US; Australia is different) ... but that case hasn't been demonstrated for movies, and I'd bet my bottom dollar they're keen to avoid it becoming "legit".

      The other point: doing so would almost certainly violate the CSS license, which Apple would have signed to be able to include their DVD player. Yes, you can now get CSS decoding without a license ... but Apple doesn't have that option (and I'm still not sure whether it would be considered legal in the US, given the DMCA.)

    3. Re:Copying your legally-owned DVDs... by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you have out of date hardware, ripping a dvd is painfully slow, like overnight slow.
      Most consumers don't have dual processor g5's as far as I know.

      --
      music lover since 1969
    4. Re:Copying your legally-owned DVDs... by Val314 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      its easy, but unfortunatly illegal.
      at least here in Austria its not allowed to break a copy protection. (and yes: CSS counts as copy protection)

    5. Re:Copying your legally-owned DVDs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If Apple came up with ripping software that applied FairPlay to an MP4 rip of a DVD (i.e., it added the same encryption to your DVD that iTunes does to your downloaded music files), they could *probably* get a license for CSS descrambling. Whether or not that is a desirable outcome for consumers is another question. HandBrake is pretty easy to use, but it is not quite iTunes easy. Ideally, DVD ripping software would automatically identify and rip all "primary" programs on a DVD - for instance, the "movie" on a movie DVD, or all episodes of a TV show on a TV DVD - or at least give you a list of *identified* tracks that you could choose to rip or not rip, rather than (as HandBrake does) a drop-down menu of "titles" with no information other than length. You'd need a DB like CDDB to do this right, and since DVDs (unlike CDs) give you a visible menu when you play it as intended, there won't be as many people motivated to add to the DB - it will be only rippers using it, and not just everyday DVD players (as DBs like CDDB were originally created simply for CD players).

    6. Re:Copying your legally-owned DVDs... by plj · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Mod parent up. The DVD CCA will never grant Apple a license to rip CSS-encrypted movies to a hard disk. While it is technically entirely feasible to make DVD ripping as easy as CD ripping, it is not, for legal reasons, anything that a major consumer electronics manufacturer like Apple can do.

      This is all just DVD DRM (aka CSS) hard at work, stifling innovation.

      --
      “Wait for Hurd if you want something real” –Linus
    7. Re:Copying your legally-owned DVDs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but ripping a CD is not illegal, ripping a DVD is.
      Apple cant make an app like that.

    8. Re:Copying your legally-owned DVDs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      If you need a Mac manufactured in the past two years to transcode DVDs at a reasonable quality in a reasonable amount of time, then Macs are dog-slow. A P4 1.6, which would probably be outperformed by a P3 1.0, can rip at about 40fps. I strongly suspect that any Intel PC manufactured in this millenium can transcode a 3-hour DVD in less than 5 hours. I would be very surprised if this weren't true for Macs as well.

      And let's not forget that if you're ripping for a video iPod or something else with a small screen, the resolution will be going from 720x480 (or x576) to like 360x200. That will make encoding a lot faster, even with the overhead of a software scaler.

    9. Re:Copying your legally-owned DVDs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      vlc, just point it at the DVD, and the output file, and select a codec. Job Done.

    10. Re:Copying your legally-owned DVDs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is out of date?
      Using VLC on a old 2GHz, 512Mb RAM, 16x DVD machine it takes ~2hrs for a 1.2hrs film.
      On my very old box maybe 3hrs. Not that big a wait.

    11. Re:Copying your legally-owned DVDs... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      No, the guy just does not know what he is talking about.

      on my 1 GHz G4, it takes about 1 hour to rip the DVD and then about 4-5 hours to encode it depending on the compression.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    12. Re:Copying your legally-owned DVDs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is exactly what the parent said. Do you really expect someone to sit at his computer for six hours waiting for a DVD to rip? Six hours is overnight. Or, if you want to watch a movie at night, you'd have to start ripping it in the early afternoon.

    13. Re:Copying your legally-owned DVDs... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      actually, the parent was talking about Pentium processors and was calling the mac slow because the grandparent said that it takes over night to encode a movie.... BTW, 6 hours is not over night.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    14. Re:Copying your legally-owned DVDs... by rthille · · Score: 1

      BTW, 6 hours is not over night.

      I don't know, I tend to sleep 6-7 hours each night, and if my computer is going to be next-to-useless (CPU pegged doing encoding) for 6 hours, I'd certainly rather have it be when I'm sleeping, rather than when I'm trying to compile and debug some code.

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    15. Re:Copying your legally-owned DVDs... by theantipop · · Score: 1

      The problem with all-in-one push one button to encode type applications is that they usually result in horrible quality videos. Encoding video is a very, VERY delicate process to result in a good looking video. Forget bit rate issues, you can have a 2mbps video that looks crappy because of issues with interlacing, telecining, rainbowing, blended field effects, color fields, etc, etc. There's just no way to build an all-in-one app to do video encoding properly.

    16. Re:Copying your legally-owned DVDs... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      If you have out of date hardware, ripping a dvd is painfully slow, like overnight slow.
      Most consumers don't have dual processor g5's as far as I know.


      Are people nowadays really that impatient? I don't see why popping in DVD before you go to bed, only to have a nice DVD rip waiting for you when you get up to be such a hassle. Many people leave their computers on 24/7 anyway, so they might as well be doing something instead of just sitting there idle wasting electricity.

    17. Re:Copying your legally-owned DVDs... by Lussarn · · Score: 1

      When I recode my movies for watching on my portable gmini 400, my p4 3.0 does it in about 170fps. Or about 15 minutes a movie. The end result for an 2 hour movie is about 300Mb,300kbps mpeg4 video, 64kbps mp3 sound.

      I think it's a very reasonable time. Can be done in the morning before I get on the bus to watch it. It should be noted that I already have all my movies on the hardrive, but I don't think the actual copying of the DVD is that expensive timewise.

      Yes, this is singlepass and lowquality so the filesize is probably about the double of what it would be if it was done correctly but it's still very usable.

    18. Re:Copying your legally-owned DVDs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's actually not true. QuickTime includes pro-quality H.264 and MPEG-2 encoders. An application like Apple's Compressor, which is a part of Final Cut Studio, creates damn near perfect encoding with a single click of a button. (Well, two. One to pick your format and one to say go.)

      Problem is, even Compressor, which is multithreaded, cluster-aware and very fast, takes hours to encode a significant amount of video to H.264. Hours and hours and hours.

    19. Re:Copying your legally-owned DVDs... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      When I am encoding my CPU is not useless.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    20. Re:Copying your legally-owned DVDs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can buy a handheld DVD player that will play movies just fine - so it must have some kind of CSS decryptor built in. Why not build a similar decryptor into the new iPods and give me software to rip movies from disc while maintaining all the CSS/Macrovision/UOP junk that's already on there? It wouldn't break copy protection in any way and it would give me a reason to upgrade my already huge 60GB iPod.

    21. Re:Copying your legally-owned DVDs... by glitch0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Even easier is the MEncoder GUI on OS X, where I just pop a dvd in, select "dvd rip" and get a nicely packaged rip in any format I want.

      --
      -Glitch "We all know Linux is great...it does infinite loops in 5 seconds." - Linus Torvalds
    22. Re:Copying your legally-owned DVDs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My three-year-old $99 Fry's MB+Athlon special does around 80fps encoding for 320x280 video. That's a 2-hour movie done in well under an hour, including sound compression. If I spent $99 today on a new MB/CPU combo I'me pretty sure I could get ~200 fps compression.

      This is *exactly* why Apple is moving to x386 chips - more bang for the buck. Only if you're locked into insanely high Apple prices for slow CPUs do you think that putting movies onto your handheld is *difficult*, or *slow*.

  8. Thank god, no UMD by aussie_a · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Thank god they didn't decide to go the route of Sony with a special format (such as UMD) that can only be played on a tiny machine. It's just a cash-cow for sony, and I hope that it doesn't work (I'd hate to see yet another competing video format, one that isn't even for the main television, it would be like getting movies on gameboy cartridges).

    1. Re:Thank god, no UMD by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1

      'cock'

    2. Re:Thank god, no UMD by oirtemed · · Score: 1

      Sony's UMD is a direct result of the current media control situation in America. If companies weren't allowed to have their hands in so many pots, UMD would not exist in its current form. Sony is only able to do it because they own the rights and the means to it all anyway and had to negotiate no deals.

    3. Re:Thank god, no UMD by powerlord · · Score: 1

      Absolutely ... on the other hand my PSP along with the 512MB card my brother graciously got me for graduation, means that I can lug about 2 hours worth of video on my PSP.

      All the content I watch on it is time-shifted. I record it on my TiVo, transfer the files to my PC (about 30 minutes per hour of video at Medium quality), strip the file to an unencrypted format (about 3-5 minutes per hour), transcode the video using "PSP Video 9" (about an hour per half hour of video on a 1.1Ghz Athlon), and then transfer to the PSP to watch on my comute.

      Yes, it is a bit more time intensive then I would like, and yes I drewl over the new 2GB memory stick for the PSP, but this is something that is not too difficult to do for the average tech savy user now.

      The hardest part was finding the right tools to do what I wanted, I'm tempted to write a short article about it now though, because it is so easy once you've set it up.

      The PSP is moving in the direction of becoming a portable media center ... which might hint at some of the direction for the PS3, and is exactly what Sony has in mind. (that part of Sony that is dealing with hardware ... probably not the distribution mechanisms).

      On the other hand, I have yet to buy a UMD video, and I have very little inclination to buy one. The only way I would buy them is either if they were rediculously cheap, or were bundled with a DVD when I bought it.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
  9. This isn't going to be a movie iPod by the_unknown_soldier · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's going to be a VIDEO iPod. Did anyone notice that free music videos on iTMS, which used to be updated lots haven't since June? Perhaps apple isn't giving them away because they want to sell them now!

    I very much doubt they will launch with movies. If they do it will be limited. They will simply market it as an added extra similar to album art on the color iPods.

    1. Re:This isn't going to be a movie iPod by Psykus · · Score: 1

      Or instead of selling them, they could possibly just throw them in with the purchase of a song, similar to the album art that you get automatically. To save on bandwidth, it could be optional for dial-up users.

  10. iPod be True by FlipSideXp · · Score: 0

    I love iPods, and I love my new Nano...but I really can never see myslef watching any video on anything less that a 32" screen. I hope this will not turn out to be the move that would unbuckle Job's success so far

    1. Re:iPod be True by hool5400 · · Score: 1

      Do you realise that Jobs himself thinks a video ipod is a shitty idea?

      There will be no video iPod anytime soon. Only Airport AV. The only way the iPod gets to play at this stage is by being a remote for the expected Airport AV.

      --

      Remember, it takes 42 muscles to frown and only 4 to pull the trigger of a sniper rifle.
    2. Re:iPod be True by I_Human · · Score: 1

      There will be no video iPod anytime soon. Only Airport AV. The only way the iPod gets to play at this stage is by being a remote for the expected Airport AV.

      That's not entirely correct...

      [URL]http://ipodlinux.org/Video_Player%5B/URL%5D
      [URL]http://www.makezine.com/blog/archive/2005/09/ how_to_play_video_on_ipods_wit.html%5B/URL%5D

      iPod Linux allows some form of video iPod at least =)

      --
      -JP
    3. Re:iPod be True by RetiredMidn · · Score: 1
      I really can never see myself watching any video on anything less that a 32" screen

      I agree, which is why I think an Airport Express Video (HD) is far more likely than a video iPod. A video version of Airport Express actually makes more sense then the audio version (because there's a display available for a local UI), as opposed to the iPod, where video detracts from the usefulness of the device.

      While movies and music videos are obvious content for an AE/Video, it would also be useful for iPhoto slideshows, iMovies, etc.

    4. Re:iPod be True by 3770 · · Score: 1


      How big the screen is only relevant for social viewing where there is more than one viewer. The clarity and how much of your field of vision it covers is the important factors for single person viewing.

      You will cover more of your field of vision by making the screen larger. But also by bringing it closer. The best example would be glasses with built in screens. And they already exist.

      --
      The Internet is full. Go Away!!!
  11. No one would really want it anyway by eebra82 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I don't see the use for such device. When do you actually want to watch music videos on such small display? When I carry a music player around, I do so in my pocket and I want it so small that it won't be in the way. I believe that a PVP (portable video player) would be a great thing though, although still not that necessary.

    1. Re:No one would really want it anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was there really any point of abreviating portable video player? Expecially when the abreviation is only used once.

    2. Re:No one would really want it anyway by rjejr · · Score: 1

      I can't believe anybody is saying "nobody really wants this". Sure, maybe not to watch a 90 minute movie, but there is lots of other stuff. Have you been into any retailer lately who ISN'T selling some type of small video device? GBA Video and a million other things for kids featuring SpongeBob or Pokemon. Verizon is pushing their Vcast phone/wireless network. Everybody has been waiting a lifetime for the Dick Tracey watchphonetelevision. These things would be great for tv shows - with Tivo and DVR and VOD does anybody even watch tv in "real" time anymore? Every Met fan in America would own one just to carry around Bill Buckner's most infamous moment. And every sports fan has their own moment they would like to own so all the guys could sit around the bar comparing them to see whose was bigger. I mean better. And really, isn't the whole "small screen" arguement a bit ridiculous considering we are a nation grown up on Gameboys? Not that kids have $500 or whatever to buy an "Apple Video iPod", but please, we all know these are coming. Don't think so? How many people had DVD players 10 years ago? Or cell phones? 10 years from now people will be saying confusedly - what do you mean you don't have a video player on you? It's gonna happen.

    3. Re:No one would really want it anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i agree about the small screen size. however, like the current photo ipods, i could see the use of using a docking station to watch video (movies, tv, home-videos) on a television screen. the rumored 80gb version would hold a LOT of video for those movie marathons. plus the dock would provide power, so the ipod wouldn't die in the middle of aragorn's monologue.

  12. time warp? by pbjones · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    week old whispers, sign

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
  13. Bad excuses by Kjella · · Score: 3, Funny

    The complexity to date of accomplishing such a feat has meant only a minority of computer users have dabbled with watching full-length movies on their computer, with most of those having acquired the content through file sharing services."

    Yes, putting in a DVD and have it autostart is really complex, and prevents me from "watching full-length movies on [my] computer". My friend has a flashy new phone capable of playing video, it has a tool for ripping DVDs which is equally simple. I don't see myself getting a video iPod though, I've never missed having something like that.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:Bad excuses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does the tool that comes with the phone for ripping DVDs work with CSS encrypted DVDs which most are? I doubt it (unless your friend lives outside the US, Germany, the UK, Finland, and several other EU states) since such tools are not legal in those places.

  14. Seems a bit strange by msormune · · Score: 1

    I mean a whopping 80 gigabytes of storage for just static pictures and music. What's the point of that?

    1. Re:Seems a bit strange by bugbeak · · Score: 1

      We said that when the first iPod came out with, what, five gigs? And on a side note, there's a lot of things you can do with 640kb.

    2. Re:Seems a bit strange by msormune · · Score: 1

      Uhh.... yeah but are your MP3 songs getting bigger every year???? No they are not. And no one said that about 5 gig Ipods.

    3. Re:Seems a bit strange by DilbertLand · · Score: 1

      "I mean a whopping 80 gigabytes of storage for just pictures and music. What's the point of that?"

      I'm all for buying the latest and greatest gadget, but I also agree and don't see many uses for these players with tons of storage space (and I do acutally own one of the smaller capacity ipods). You now have a device that can hold almost 6 months worth of music (assuming you listen 8 full hours every day), but only has a battery life of about 12 hours. I'm not sure I could find that much quality music in the world that's even worth listening to. I vaguely remember reading somewhere that the average music collection is about 100 CDs. I suspect that the percentage of people that would actually take full advantage of that space is fairly small. Maybe I'm wrong...

    4. Re:Seems a bit strange by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Well for the record, my CD collection is about 250 CDs and I consider that small. Plus, I stopped buying CDs several years ago when I started downloading music from the internet (first "illegal", then through iTunes). I also have a basement full of LPs and cassettes.....

    5. Re:Seems a bit strange by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you are storing your music collection as MP3s, then 80MB is a lot. On the other hand if you store your music collection is FLAC or ALE (Apple Lossless Encoding), then the extra storage space is useful.

      The question really to be asking is whether people are actually using the larger iPods in the same manner as the smaller iPods. For example are they using it for photos, personal data, movies (even if they can't be player) and other large files.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    6. Re:Seems a bit strange by piltdownman84 · · Score: 1

      The average music collection for normal people may be only 100 CDs; however, I am willing to bet those with enough disposable income to buy the most expensive portable music player on the market (This new 80GB iPod) have much larger CD collections.

      I personally am a bit of a music nut, and have about 800 CDs which translate into about 110 GB. I'm waiting for an iPod big enough to store all that, until then I'll stick with my mini (I would have stuck with my original 10GB, but it died due to a loose firewire connector)

    7. Re:Seems a bit strange by mstone · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Think of it as a bonus for people doing video production. I'm not talking about playing video on an iPod, but rather people who want to carry video data from one place to another.

      Networking geeks have an old saying: "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes." It takes a little more than three minutes to send a gigabyte of data through a T3, assuming ideal transfer conditions. By that standard, 80GB would take 240 minutes, or six hours. If we assume an average walking rate of 4mph for the average person, a pair of sneakers and an 80gig iPod would have better bandwidth than a T3 out to a range of about 20 miles, including the time necessary to load and unload the data via FireWire (@ 100MB/sec).

      Video people already like FireWire. Apple won a Clio for it a few years ago, because it gave video production companies a way to move large chunks of data around easily. Directors have come to love the idea that they can buy a Powerbook and a copy of Final Cut Pro for about the price of one day's postprocessing fees, and have immediate feedback to what they're shooting.

      For those people, the iPod is an inexpensive, ultra-portable data storage module. You could fill a briefcase with the things for a few thousand dollars and have more than enough space to carry the raw footage for an entire movie around with you.

      The same general idea works for photographers and musicians. It's easy to accumulate 80 gigs of high-quality, first-pass data when you're in the content creation business, and an iPod gives you a convenient way to stick all that information into your pocket and carry it wherever you need to go.

      Apple already knows that the sweet spot for actual music storage is about 5 gigs. They have a whole line of products for people who just want a straightforward music player. The higher-capacity models are for people who want to carry data.

    8. Re:Seems a bit strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      But if you're just using an iPod for storage it makes much more sense to just buy protable hard drives

    9. Re:Seems a bit strange by nunchux · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But if you're just using an iPod for storage it makes much more sense to just buy protable hard drives

      Then it goes full circle... You can't play music on portable hard drives.

      No one said this is either-or. I partition mine for twenty gigs of music, forty for files, and I'm able to carry around a full backup of every important project I'm working on.

    10. Re:Seems a bit strange by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      Ok, while I understand that what you describe is a valuable use for an 80gig iPod, why would Steve Jobs have made this secret announcement seem like a big deal? Just to drive us insane? I mean, it seems like something like that wouldn't be a big announcement, just a little side thing that they toss out in a press release. If it is only for like 1% of their user base...

    11. Re:Seems a bit strange by moeffju · · Score: 2, Informative

      Then why exactly would one buy a $350 (or something) iPod 80GB instead of a $130 external 300gig harddisk with Firewire? You could even get the $130 hard disk AND the what, $200, iPod Nano, and get more capacity to carry files, still enough for your music, AND save money.

      What gives?

      --
      follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/moeffju
    12. Re:Seems a bit strange by msormune · · Score: 1

      And just how fast does the battery on a 80 gigabyte iPod last when you are using it for transferring large files? Can you actually do a full circle (fill the iPod, then copy contents back to your computer) before the battery gives in?

  15. A Video iPod may be nice.. by Sunsetbeach · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If it can be connected to any TV.

    I mean imagine, you could go visit a friend, and bring your movie/porn collection...

    1. Re:A Video iPod may be nice.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You watch porn with your friends?

    2. Re:A Video iPod may be nice.. by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 1

      With only 80GBs??? Not the whole thing...

      --
      Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
    3. Re:A Video iPod may be nice.. by Xarius · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or even better! Some kind of "storage medium" that has "players" installed in most households now-a-days! Imaging most modern computers being able to Digitally write to this Versatile format? Some kind of new Disc perhaps?

      --
      C17H21NO4
    4. Re:A Video iPod may be nice.. by Sunsetbeach · · Score: 1, Funny
      Shure. You'r right.

      What about some Compact Disk, that stores Audio files, and can be played on devises installed in most households now-a-days?

      Screw the iPod!

      Oh. Wait.. Does that mean, i have to bring lots of disks?

    5. Re:A Video iPod may be nice.. by Sunsetbeach · · Score: 1
      Don't be prude..

      We even share them.

    6. Re:A Video iPod may be nice.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got to admint that I much prefer watching porn on my own (in private room with nobody watching if you know what I mean...)

    7. Re:A Video iPod may be nice.. by SoLO · · Score: 1

      Wow, finally someone understands

    8. Re:A Video iPod may be nice.. by mbourgon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Everyone assumes it's an iPod. IMHO, they'll release a new Airport Express, one that has an S-video cable out, hooks up to your TV AND stereo, and plays movies off of your Mac directly.

      In which case, you'll be watching your neighbor's home pr0n, which is probably a scarier proposition.

      But "As Seen On TV" (long since vanished) mentioned it quite a while ago. It does seem a genius move, if they can pull it off - last I remember, he mentioned there being several technical hurdles to be overcome, mostly doing with the state of video-streamed-over-802.11.

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
  16. I already have an iPod Video... by michaelzhao · · Score: 5, Informative

    Its called the iPod-Linux. If you install Linux on your iPod Photo, it will play video. It takes 24 bit uncompressed AVI files and splits up the sound. It takes each frame separately and stores it as a slideshow. Next, it goes to the slideshow and accelerates the frames to 30 frames a second while playing audio in the background. Voila! Although the screen is small, no screen is too small for the Boondock Saints.

    1. Re:I already have an iPod Video... by ekes · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Got there just before me anyway linkage http://ipodlinux.org/Video_Player

    2. Re:I already have an iPod Video... by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      And it stores the video _completely_ uncompressed. yeah to capacity and efficiency :)

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    3. Re:I already have an iPod Video... by anethema · · Score: 1

      Well, there is the jpg compression :)

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    4. Re:I already have an iPod Video... by Slashdiddly · · Score: 1

      Me too! But my video player is a paper notebook. All I have to do is copy down last night's show - each frame in a corner of a new page. When ready to watch, just leaf through the pages real fast. If you want audio, just sing along.

    5. Re:I already have an iPod Video... by josh42 · · Score: 1

      It's COMPLETELY uncompressed: 2GB for 30 minutes of color video 220x176 15fps. Unfortunately, FAT32 doesn't support files bigger than 2GB, so you can only get about that much video at once.

      And yes, we're working on improving it.

  17. VideoCasts... by lpangelrob · · Score: 1
    So maybe Apple wants to do video podcasts, assuming podcasts aren't a fad right now, and that at least a segment of today's "traditional" media will tacitly allow timeshifting video, on a smaller scale.

    This wouldn't be easy. Where's the software for everyday end-users to record and edit video? Did Apple suddenly create a magical algorithm that cut the size of a 30 minute show to less than a gigabyte, even if only at 320 x 320 resolution? Since the bandwidth for podcasts is relatively small, who will supply the bandwidth for transferring videos?

    If Apple has managed to find a way to solve all those problems... well, I'll just wait 'til after the announcement to get excited.

    1. Re:VideoCasts... by kmcneely · · Score: 3, Informative
      "Where's the software for everyday end-users to record and edit video?"

      It comes with every new Apple computer.

      "Did Apple suddenly create a magical algorithm that cut the size of a 30 minute show to less than a gigabyte, even if only at 320 x 320 resolution?"

      Well, they didn't INVENT Mpeg-4....

    2. Re:VideoCasts... by __aajqwr7439 · · Score: 1

      Last time I flew to London with my PSP, PSPWare managed to fill it with five episodes of Chappelle's Show, three BSG and a couple Land of the Lost on my one gig memory stick. Not quite the 10 hours/gig estimate, but not bad,

      Quality wasn't awesome, but it was definitely watchable.

      If Apple releases the video Ipod with any decent capacity (even 4 gigs of flash memory (because hd+color=35 minutes of bettery life)), there could be room for whole seasons of shows.

      DN

    3. Re:VideoCasts... by mr_squig · · Score: 1

      Well There's DivX, Xvid, Mpeg4...

    4. Re:VideoCasts... by shmlco · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "because hd+color=35 minutes of bettery life"

      Ummm... they have hd+color now, and get 15 hours. Mostly by running the drive and loading a bunch of music into RAM, then shutting the drive down while they play from RAM. No reason the same trick couldn't be played with video.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
  18. There won't be a video iPod by joelhayhurst · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Jobs has said time and time again that he thinks the idea of a video iPod is stupid and doesn't want to make one. And yet, Slashdot keeps acting like it will be a reality. He even went so far as to mock companies that were pursuing portable video.

    I've actually posted a comment similar to this a year ago. Here is the Apple Special Event 04. 12:35 into the video.

    1. Re:There won't be a video iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You mean much the same way he stated that flash mp3 players were stupid?

      He may think so, but he knows how to change his tune when he sees an opportunity to make money.

    2. Re:There won't be a video iPod by joelhayhurst · · Score: 1

      When did he say that, and what was his reasoning? Maybe this was before flash technology was good enough to support the average user's entire music collection.

    3. Re:There won't be a video iPod by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      jobs says a lot of things.

      but there's a point where they're intentionally limiting the features to keep it simple even if the new feature would be only few hundred kb's of software on the device - they're already at that point, the photo ipod is powerful enough to play video. like, home videos don't make sense but photos do ? there's no logic in that.

      so.. wanna bet that there won't be a video ipod? i'm pretty sure that apple will produce sooner or later a portable device that also plays videos - if they don't stop making portable devices totally.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:There won't be a video iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure the exact date of the quote, but you can read references of it
      here and here (4th P) for starters.

      The reasoning for his not liking flash players? Apple didn't yet have one ;)

    5. Re:There won't be a video iPod by stickfigure · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure an iPod video would have been crazy LAST YEAR. Way back then you'd have to be daft to even consider it. The proof? Well you don't have one, do you? Now doing it today? That's another story. Today it's all "wave of the future", "the next big thing" and "whatnot."

      Never underestimate the power of Steve's reality distortion field.

    6. Re:There won't be a video iPod by cybpunks3 · · Score: 1

      Didn't he say similar things about a headless iMac?

    7. Re:There won't be a video iPod by cybpunks3 · · Score: 1

      The iPod Photo has two 80mhz ARM chips in it. That's not enough to decode fullres MPEG4 in realtime. Heck, today's xScale PDAs can barely do that at around 500mhz. It would need a faster CPU and/or a dedicated custom decoder chip.

      Just beause it can do a slideshow that looks like a video doesn't mean it's a viable video player.

  19. predicted here on slashdot 2 weeks ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. there was a comment a couple of weeks ago (in a nano story I think), saying that a 80gb would be announced very soon.. can anyone find the post/poster?

  20. Crazy! by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

    "While a video-capable iPod remains in development, without the agreements nor infrastructure in place to deliver movies to customers through a store-like interface, Apple sees little value in releasing such an iPod at this time"

    80gb ? Im crazy about music and I've got roughly 350 cd albums I've hand ripped and encoded at a high bitrate. Last time I checked my 30gb iPod has about 7gb free. I wanted a 40gb model but at the time I bought mine the next size up was the 60gb model - that just seemed excessive so i went with the lower model. Im curious does anyone actually have 80gb of legal mp3's or better still a CD collection large enough to fill one of these up? I can see the advantage of this for people who rip to lossless format. But I would imagine most people a reasonable compression/quality for a portable device like the iPod?

    Personally I cant see a lot of people forking out for an 80gb model. Joe public seems happy enough with the 4 and 6gb models. Video iPod is much more likely to get people spending (especially when apple have perfected whatever magical hardware/software interface they have in the pipeline)

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    1. Re:Crazy! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      I am confused by your maths. You have 350CDs. Each CD is 650MB. Let's assume that actually they only use an average of 80% of that space. This gives 177GB. Now, lossless compression could get this down to around 89GB. Encoding at a high bitrate (256kb/s) squeezes it down to 44GB. And yet, somehow you squeezed this into under 23GB?

      I think, perhaps, you have a different definition of high bitrate to me. It sounds like you count 128kb/s as high bitrate. This is just about acceptable if you are using the PsyTEL encoder, or the Dolby Pro encoder, but since you said it was hand encoded, then I would assume you are using either the Dolby Consumer encoder, or an MP3 encoder - both of which introduce noticeable distortion at 128kb/s.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Crazy! by necro81 · · Score: 1

      I agree that 80 GB of music with any reasonable amount of compression (from ripping) would be a tall order. Imagine having a 'Music' folder on one's computer that was 80 GB in size!

      One use for such an iPod that I could see is using it as part mp3 player, part external (firewire) harddrive. I use my 3rd gen, 10 GB iPod for that , but am also looking for a nice, 2.5" external HDD and enclosure for backing up a whole lot of stuff. It is hard to imagine a nicer looking (or more compact) packaging of such a large (80 GB) and small (2.5" form factor) harddrive.

      I seem to recall that, at certain times during the post-production, Peter Jackson and others used iPods as inconspicuous harddrives to carry rough cuts of the LotR movies between the editing rooms and special effects shops in New Zealand and the studios in California. Sending hard drives back and forth was sometimes faster than sending it as data over wire.

      My final comment would simply be that, any time in the last 50 years that someone has said "No one would ever need something that large/fast?" as it relates to computers, has always been proven wrong within a decade, if not sooner. I guess we'll just have to wait and see just what, in this case, that might be.

    3. Re:Crazy! by kilonad · · Score: 1

      Assume each CD is 1 hour, and he means 160kbps encoding (which isn't really that high, but you'll see why I make that assumption). 350 CDs * 1 hour/cd * 3600 sec/hour * 160kbps * 1/8 bytes/bit * 1/1048576 GB/KB = 24.03GB. 128kbps would make it 19.2GB. 192kbps would make it 28.8GB. 256kbps would make it 38.4GB (close enough.)

    4. Re:Crazy! by tf23 · · Score: 1

      It's not just the music.

      I just bought a 4th gen 60gb. (I had a 10gb 3rd gen for ~2 years). The 10gb wasn't enough to hold just the music. Top that off with calendar stuff, files, and selective (encrypted) backups, and I was always fighting for space on the old one.

      Now with the 60 I have plenty of room. And I can put pictures on the thing as well! It's very very cool.

      But the pictures eat up space, and eat up a ton of space if I put them on the thing at full resolution. (I have about 20,000 pictures in iPhoto, so I'm having to be selective about which photos go on the iPod).

      What'll eventually come around is the home-on-the-ipod w/ encryption so you can walk up to any OSX machine with the iPod, plug it in, and there's all your stuff. But, you'll need sizeable drive to store *everything* on your iPod.

      Hence, 80gb...

    5. Re:Crazy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to throw a spanner in the works Ill tell you that most of my music is compressed using LAME set to use high-quality variable bit rate compression with a minimum of 160kbs. Naturally some things compress better than others.

      In any case i did use the term "roughly" to indicate just that!

  21. TV programs? by Akimotos · · Score: 1

    Nowadays I record certain TV show (talkshows, documentaries) to watch 'm on the go using my Sony PSP and PSPware. Quite convenient, since I normally don't make time to watch tv. I think there is real potential in that field for a decent mobile videoplayer.

  22. Powerbook updates by Danathar · · Score: 1

    I've been holding off on a powerbook anticipating an upgrade. I REALLY hope they at the very least increase the memory speed on the powerbooks.

    1. Re:Powerbook updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been holding off on a powerbook anticipating an upgrade. I REALLY hope they at the very least increase the memory speed on the powerbooks.

      Everybody is waiting for Powerbook upgrades, and everybody wants faster Powerbooks. Strangely, nobody can identify any task which a faster Powerbook could do that a current Powerbook cannot.

      I remember a lot of professionals were using Final Cut Pro on 500 MHz G4 Powerbooks a few years ago, yet now people aren't sure a 1.5 GHz G4 is fast enough for that.

    2. Re:Powerbook updates by hobbit · · Score: 1
      Strangely, nobody can identify any task which a faster Powerbook could do that a current Powerbook cannot.
      In a story full of comments about how long it takes a PowerBook to rip a DVD, you really can't think of anything at all?!
      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
  23. Commuters love this technology. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in Seoul, and everyday I see people using PSPs (yes to play games as well as watch films, of course) or iRiver players. Same goes for Tokyo, and although I've never been there, I imagine New York probably has the same scenario. So there's definitely a market out there.

    As has been said before, the ROKR is doomed to fail as long as carriers continue to charge insane prices for data. Also, in my opinion, that is one ugly phone. They should start using mini-SDram instead of flash memory in order to facilitate design.

  24. Maybe this this ipod will be... by Aenema · · Score: 1

    the ipod video for those who choose to install podzilla?

  25. Re:Crazy! (or not?) by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
    80gb ? Im crazy about music and I've got roughly 350 cd albums I've hand ripped and encoded at a high bitrate. Last time I checked my 30gb iPod has about 7gb free

    Many years ago I used to work in OpenVMS. With every release we would get a pack of CD's with just about every bit of software you could buy for VMS from DEC.

    You couldn't run the software without paying for it first because of all the DRM in VMS. Doing it this way just simplified distribution.

    Now I wonder if Apple could do a similar thing with the iPod. You subscribe to a particular category of music (not everything) and then pay for what you listen to. 80G might be enough for this.

  26. If only by Jargonwhat · · Score: 1

    It would be a brilliant move though... Release the nano, wait a month for stocks to dwindle, then BAM! 80 GB Video iPod. Just in time for xmas shopping season. It's probably going to be the video AirTunes though, which would be a good way for Apple to gauge the market for a possible iTunes Video Store. As we've seen with the online Serenity teaser, it's definitely possible to stream high quality content to thousands of people simultaneously. I really wouldn't mind paying a few dollars an episode for Battlestar Galactica... It would be a much more tangible way to support the show and help ensure future seasons, since I don't have a Nielsen box in my house (and I always miss it on TV anyway and have to download it).

  27. consumer portable video is here now by rhyd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a nokia 6230. This is a regular joe - standard nokia candy bar form factor series 40 - phone. Its not a smart phone / mobile computer / email executive toy. This is a phone marketed to kids / fashion crowd. An updated version is already in the shops marketed as free with a 12 month contract (i.e. in j6p's eyes this is a completely free phone).

    now using just dvd-decryptor and the software (transcoder) that comes with the phone you can copy a complete dvd-film to the memory card. a film takes up about 100MB. I have a 1GB of cf memory. I generally carry a couple of films and several mp3/aac albums everywhere i go.

    Cons:
    1. The screen is low resulution so the quality is pretty bad.
    2. have to break the drm on the dvd. No legal way to get mainstream content.
    3. nokias pc software sucks. Its really really bad - can't stress that enough. If it was even 60% as good as itunes interface i'd be happy.
    4. syncs over bluetooth, not fast enough for me, but newer faster bluetooth versions are already here.

    Pros.
    1. uses .3gp video format which is just a rebadged cutting-edge highdef format repurposed for embedded devices. really gets amazing small file sizes, with acceptable picture.
    2. Can share music/videos with other peoples phones with a few button presses - all don over bluetooth. No drm thankyou very much.
    3. Phone has a built in speaker so several people can watch (squint at) the film.

    This phone is a gameboy,video player, ipod,crackberry,phone,pager, calendar,internet browser,wap browser ... You can download the j2me toolkit from sun and write your own programs/games for free. There is open source community around j2me for instance I use j2meVNC for remote desktop access which is useable if not a pleasure. All this rolled into one device Yes it sucks at almost all its 2ndary roles - but then it is virtually FREE!

    So for me all apple would be bringing to party is a slick interface, some nasty DRM, and a big fat price tag. It might sell but only because j6p doesn't know how good his 6320 could be.

    Apple had better release the iphone in the next couple of years or they're spent.Nokia, sony and microsoft will eat them for breakfast.

    --
    'Be the change you want to see in the world' - Al Gore
    1. Re:consumer portable video is here now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forgot nokia 6230 also has an FM radio, digital camera, and can record both audio and video. A truly amazing geektoy - and in real terms it cost me less than the 256mb ipod shuffle.

  28. Wrong! by Hitchcock_Blonde · · Score: 3, Funny

    Obviously, ThinkSecret is wrong.

    --
    Karma Schmarma
  29. I've hand ripped by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    So you arranged the bits yourself?

  30. Re:Crazy! (or not?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, Apple could do that -- there's a number of online music services that let you listen to as much as you want for a flat monthly fee.

  31. Jobs says a lot of thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Steve Jobs lips are a like a long distance runner. They keep going and going and going...

    And when you talk that long, its inevitable that stupid stuff will dribble from your mouth sometimes.

    Anyway, don't worry, stevie is still god, Apple is the best, blah blah, you can wipe the spittle off your chin now.

  32. Haven't been paying attention by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

    Steve Jobs still believes video mobile devices aren't practicle, so I doubt Apple is intending the release of a full-scale multimedia device.

    But video playback on current color versions of the iPod is trivial, really. I am sure a firmware update could make it happen on any color/photo related product. All you need is a slideshow that shows 24fps and sync that to a music track, hardly a stretch for the color iPods.

    If anything, Apple will release an iPod that can play back DRM video content ONLY. That is, it can play videos from the ITMS but that is it, anyone believing Apple will come out with a device that will allow playback of ripped DVD's in a variety of formats like DIVX or MPEG is dreaming.

    This would make the Video iPod quite literally a Video iPod, playing music videos. If Apple wanted an iPod to playback movies, they would call it the Movie iPod.

    Also, releasing a video iPod would trump the iPod Nano, a move that wouldn't be bright for Apple considering the lackluster sales and questions of quality in this new device. I would think Apple would want to ensure that buzz about the Nano keeps up, especially going into the holiday season. I am sure that updating the iPod model lines to make all iPods sleeker and smaller is in the works, banking on research they used to make the Nano, but any "Spectacular" new iPod features would simply end buzz surrounding the Nano, not even a month after its release and sales would make it a truely failed product release.

    Anyways, speculating on what Apple will do can give you a headache, I for one don't count on anything Apple says or does until the product is available for sale on their website, a practice I wish more people would take to heart rather then endless rumors and speculation.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
    1. Re:Haven't been paying attention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes... The iPod nano sales are so lackluster that Apple can't even keep the 4gig versions in stock. Please actually look up information before you invent it.

  33. Not just music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    tiny cartoon or movie shorts like they already have for gameboy advance (although crappy and pseudo flash based). There are plenty of short videos ..blooper videos, that star wars/COPS spoof .. troops. There could be a whole industry of 3 to 5 minute video shorts and they dont have to all be comedy .Like they may even be HOW TO videos like recipe or cooking videos. However, since i am cheap, I am not paying more than 5 cents each.

    If Apple comes out with a video ipod it'll be interesting to see if they allow people to rip their existing DVD's and play them on the ipod. Or will they force people to buy the videos from Apple in some propreitery format.

    You know Apple doesnt have to come up with these ideas, people give 'em to them. In my opinion, Apple is more evil and moopolistic than microsoft because not only do they bundle software that competes directly with third party software makers, they also won't open up the Fairplay format. At least Microsoft's DRM formats anyone can implement.

  34. Is there an end in sight? by Nerdposeur · · Score: 1

    So they're moving toward an 80 GB model. Scaling up their estimations, that would hold 20,000 songs.

    How much is enough? Will there come a point when we say, "I don't NEED more storage on this device?" For example, with music, if you can store more songs than you'd ever have time to listen to, you're done.

    Sure, video would up the limit considerably. And maybe someday video will give way to virtual reality. I just wonder sometimes where it will end. Or maybe it will plateau out - like cars, for example. The model T was slower than today's cars, but at this point we're not trying to make cars faster. They're fast enough already, and can be improved in other ways. Will technology see an end to the "more and faster" stage? What does the Slashdot community think?

    1. Re:Is there an end in sight? by eMartin · · Score: 1

      I bet you were one of those people who thought a 100 MB hard drive would always be enough, because it could hold everything YOU needed at the time.

      Sure, the iPod is still measured in terms of how many 128k mp3/aac files it can hold, but plenty of us have long since moved on to higher bit rates, are looking forward to uncompressed music, AND use it for storing other non-music things.

    2. Re:Is there an end in sight? by Nerdposeur · · Score: 1

      You're missing my point. I'm not saying "golly, isn't 60 GB enough?" I'm asking whether anyone thinks we'll ever reach a stopping point. Like maybe when you can fit a lifetime worth of virtual reality simulations in a device the size of a grain of rice. Will we still want more?

      Will there come a point when, for the average person, there's no point in building faster microprocessors or bigger hard drives?

    3. Re:Is there an end in sight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, there's no limit. We'll just find more things to do with it.

      For example, at 80 GB, a lot of people can pretty much keep backups of all their files on it. How many people do regular backups today? With this, they'd have fast, always-there, automatic backups. You could even encrypt it, and let it work on other Macs (so you can plug in your iPod and log in to your account on any Mac). Or even put a copy of Mac OS on it to boot from.

      Remember, it's an iPod, but it's also just a portable hard disk. If you can't think of ways to productively use the fact that average joes are walking around with 80 GB disks in their pockets, you're not trying very hard.

  35. One More Thing... by kinkadius · · Score: 1

    So lemme get this straight, he sent out invitationals with BIG red curtains on them and the catch phrase he uses for a big big announcement... for hard drive upgrade and some cosmetics? Really? Come on. Okay maybe it's not the video iPod, i'll bite that, but don't you think that whatever announcement they are going to make is at least going to be somewhat big? Unless this guy uses this catch phrase all the time:

    Jobs: "Oh, and one more thing... i have to go to the bathroom. Excuse me."

    --
    www.omglolh4x.com
    1. Re:One More Thing... by Therlin · · Score: 1

      Thank you! That's what I had been thinking the whole time while reading this thread. There has to be more to this announcement than a larger hard drive. Jobs usually uses "one more thing" at the end of his keynotes to present something that no one expected. So it may not be a video iPod, but hopefully we will be surprised with something cool.

    2. Re:One More Thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jobs usually uses "one more thing" at the end of his keynotes to present something that no one expected

      like going from ppc to x86, or scratching the screen of the nano.

    3. Re:One More Thing... by dreamer-of-rules · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's a new keyboard/mouse combo, like the recently bought-and-silenced Fingerworks keyboards?

      --
      Everyone is entitled to his own opinions, but not his own facts.
  36. Lack of licensing agreement by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2, Funny

    I guess 99 cents per movie wasn't enough for those greedy Hollywood studios.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:Lack of licensing agreement by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Possibly not. But what about TV shows? How about 99 for an episode, $9.99 for a season? You pick a show you like and subscribe to the podcast. Every week, you find a new episode sitting on your hard drive. You can then burn it to VCD or DVD, watch it on your laptop, or stream it to your Airport Express AV base station.

      Before anyone mentions TiVo:

      • Last time I checked, TiVo to go was Windows only - I don't own a Windows box.
      • It doesn't allow you to burn to DVD, so I can't watch shows at a friend's house.
      • It requires you to have a subscription to TiVo for it to work, and a subscription to cable or satellite TV for there to be much worth watching.
      • Most cable / satellite channels in the UK are stuffed full of adverts[1]
      • We still have to wait a long time to get shows from the US - if Apple managed to get worldwide distribution rights, then they could do a lot of damage to the subscription TV companies in the UK.

      [1] Not quite as many as you get in the US, but enough to make me cancel my cable subscription - a 40 minute show should not require a one hour time slot.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Lack of licensing agreement by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      But what about TV shows? How about 99 [cents] for an episode, $9.99 for a season?

      Are you kidding? A season of a TV show costs $30-50 on DVD (except the HBO ones, which are $100 for 12 episodes!). Steve's Reality Distortion Field is powerful, but I don't think it can get us a 3-5x discount on TV shows.

  37. Oh goody! by almound · · Score: 1

    "The complexity to date of accomplishing such a feat has meant only a minority of computer users have dabbled with watching full-length movies on their computer, with most of those having acquired the content through file sharing services."

    Does that mean they'll leave me alone to watch my full-length feature films acquired through file sharing services in peace? Imagine that. No DRM, no suits by the RIAA. Of course, I don't get them through bitTorrent.

    alt.binaries.documentaries is a hoot!

    (Alex Jones even gives out his hard-hitting feature-length documentaries for free)

    alt.binaries.great and

    alt.binaries.radio.misc

    each have full-length recordings of all my favorite reality talk-radio programs

    NNTP ... slashdotters should know what that's about. There's no excuse to be un-informed.

  38. what the hell? by dwntwnboi · · Score: 0

    bullsh*t. apple knows full well that video piracy will make the video ipod explode just as music piracy made the ipod explode. what's REALLY going on here?

  39. Re:Crazy! (not) by DusterBar · · Score: 2, Interesting
    My personal CD collection is a bit over 1200 CDs. (And some are multi-disc titles) Add in around 800 LPs plus some old collectors 78s and 45s and I get a ton of music to encode. I am almost done with my CD collection and I did a few LPs already but the LPs take a long time (there is no 10x RIP speed :-()

    So, while I may not have a huge collection, I do have a reasonably large one and at high bit rates (192+ VBR) they tend to take up some room.

    Plus, my iPod has a few essential data files on it (such as the code to manage the iPod written in Perl) and some pictures of the family.

  40. it would be interesting by zogger · · Score: 1

    if you could buy it pre loaded with the genre of your choice.

    of course 10,000$ in advance would suck....

    but the concept is interesting, you could go to the online store,start clicking what music you want at so much a gig,(whatever they work out) then order the player, it ships ready to rock (or jazz or whatever). No requirement to fill it up all at once, but a very decent selection could be made.

    They'd obviously have to make better pricing arrangements (a buck a song in advance just wouldn't fly), but eventually I think the content providers will bingo to bulk and very very cheap sales are still sales, better than *no sale* and fight copying. If the content is loaded at the factory, bandwith costs are dramatically reduced so it could be offered cheaper, and costs to the content providers would theoretically be identical, so they would actually make more money, even if it meant they cut loose with more copies for much cheaper. And hassle to the consumer is really reduced, making happy and legal campers. I don't think at this time you could do it with individual songs easily or cheaply, but if you were presented with a choice like "10 gigs assorted metal" or "5 gigs assorted C&W" whatever and the price was reasonable enough people might go for it when ordering a new player.

    Of course, I have no idea if anyone is even doing this now,selling preloaded units, I don't follow that portable music player scene all that much except a few articles I read here. I use a one dollar (full retail price at biglots) tiny FM only radio for my portable music when I am outside, and that is infrequent. When I work it's usually in a quite loud environment so I have to use a full noise cancelling over the ear headset. I tried it with earbuds for media content then the headset and it sorta works but not that well. probably need to just build my own into the comfortable noise reduction units first, so can cancel out the outside noise, and add the inside the headset content I want. Maybe, sounds like work though...

    meh I am one cheap dood HAHAHAHA!.......been holding out for a very full featured pda or smartphone to hit 100$ or so before I get anything like that. Has to do everything, wireless net, media playback, cellphone,short range walkie talkie, simple computing tasks, etc and non ridiculous screen and keyboard size. It'll get there in a coupla years probably, judging by flashmemory improvements and better processors for gadgets.

  41. The reason for no video iPod... by Starker_Kull · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The most fundamental reason is that it sucks to watch movies on a 3" or smaller screen. The beauty of sound is that the size of the generator doesn't matter (much - audiophiles will point out the lack of base, clipping/overshooting on square wave tests, etc.); this is just not true of visuals. The only way around this is if someone can put a 3" screen 3" from your eyeballs (to get the same angular coverage as a movie or TV screen) and hold it there, comfortably.

    iGlasses, anyone?

  42. Yeah, "640 K should be enough for anybody..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "What's the point of having a (gasp!) 80 GIG IPOD?"

    Dude, if Apple made a 200 gig iPod, I'd buy it, and I could fill it up immediately. My wife and I own well over 2000 CDs, of virtually every kind of music -- rock, classical, techno, ambient, new age, world, film soundtracks, lounge, jazz -- the list goes on, and I've ripped virtually our entire CD collection to the highest quality 320 bps .mps. (We also use our iPods connected to our home stereo systems, too.) We travel a lot out of the country, and when we travel, we don't want to listen to a relative handful of pop songs -- we want to have the highest quality versions of as much music as we can comfortably carry with us, and a 4 gig iPod, to us, is simply laughably small.

    Right now, my 60 gig Photo iPod holds 7185 "songs" (if you call some 30-minute classical pieces "songs"), or almost 17 DAYS worth of music. Yep, that's a lot -- but it still represents less than half of my film soundtrack collection alone.

    Not everyone using an iPod wants to constantly cycle music through it, or doesn't mind if he/she's listening to the latest pop crap recorded at a low bit rate. When I'm traveling, I want as much of my home CD collection with me as possible, and I want it to sound fantastic, because I may be hooking it up to an external source.

  43. Video not the same as audio by TintinX · · Score: 1

    Video is soooo different to audio on a portable device.
    With audio you have the same experience as you'd have in the 'full' sense PLUS listening to an album over and over again is entirely normal and expected. With video, you may watch the content once or possibly twice in a small form factor and that's it. Why would anybody buy an iPod movie for full bucks when they can rip? I think the movie studios are all too aware of this which is why they will never agree to a licence similar to the one set up for ITMS. Sure, the same could be said for music but paying 99c or $10 for an album that you can burn easily to a CD (how common are DVD burners?) is an entirely different matter.

  44. Media event for modest product updates? No way. by calstraycat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have no idea what will be announced at this event, but I think it's safe to assume that Thinksecret's assertion that Apple will simply announce modest updates to it's iPod, Powerbook and Power Mac product lines is highly unlikely. Apple only orchestrates these types of highly-publicized events when they are introducing a brand new or substantially different product.

    I just can't see Jobs deliberately getting the media buzz going with his cryptic little invitation and then getting on stage and saying "look, here's our new 80 GB iPod and our dual-core Power Mac...oh, and one more thing...our Powerbooks have higher resolution screens".

    Something new will be announced. I'd bet against a video iPod, but this event is most assuredly not for announcing product updates.

    1. Re:Media event for modest product updates? No way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yup...think photoshop competitor...although that may wait for macworld.

    2. Re:Media event for modest product updates? No way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How soon we all forget...

      It's *obviously* going to be an announcement for the long awaited G5 Powerbook!

  45. Why not an iPod phone? by webteeth · · Score: 0

    I highly doubt Apple will release an iPod video, the content just isn't there. Additionally, an iPod screen is too small, even if it were stretched the screen to three inches, or something of that nature. And who is going to bother hooking up the iPod to their T.V. each time they want to watch a video?

    But I remember watching a stream of Motorola's press event, and they stated that Apple would release it's phone before the end of this quarter.

    Could it be there were some delay in the phone they're developing? Is this Special Event scheduled before Apple's current quarter ends? I'd appreciate a response to the latter question.

  46. More data points? by turnitover · · Score: 1

    FWIW, some more analysts weigh in at an article in eWEEK. They agree that one problem would be that ripping a DVD would be illegal. Still, they kind of say that there's no reason Apple could, but what's the angle? Of course, none of us could figure out the angle before Jobs introduced the iPod -- and then it was all clear. That's why he earns the big buck ($1/yr).

  47. Bridge selling by bidule · · Score: 2


    No, of course not, we didn't invent this story. There really is a Video iPod in development. Don't listen to Jobs, he's trying to cover it up.

    And no, this isn't bait and switch. We aren't switching to a more likely story to make it seem that we are guessing right. It is not as if we had a history of fabulation.

    Yeah, right.

    --
    ID: the nose did not occur naturally, how would we wear glasses otherwise? (apologies to Voltaire)
  48. That's a shame, Video ipod might be cool. by cobaltgrc · · Score: 1

    Sure the screen would be too small, but what if they made an ipod that could record shows directly from a TV into the proper format instead of all the hassle of coverting it with a computer? Then it would be like a mini Tivo. Is that even possible?

    1. Re:That's a shame, Video ipod might be cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude... have you ever seen this...?

      http://www.archos.com/products/av_500/

      All of Archos products the start with AV are PVR's (Personal Video Recorders). I've been recording with my AV340 off of TV and DVD's for the last two years. They started with a 1.8" Screen PVR years and years ago.

    2. Re:That's a shame, Video ipod might be cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This iPod video, somehow cool, reminds me the Archos JBM20, that was 3 years ago. PocketMultimedia Player (MP3, MPEG4, Jpegs...) AND Personal Video Recorder directly from any video source with the appropriate addon. Well, that was indeed 3 years ago. :D

      Jaffar1967 (didn't bother to create an account)

  49. iTunes Version Number by alset_tech · · Score: 1

    The most compelling evidence against a video update can be seen in the recent update of iTunes to version 5.x. It's a safe bet that Apple would save the first digit upgrade and interface revamp for a month if they had a video iPod ready to go.

    --
    Standing on the shoulders of giants.
  50. DMCA by GoClick · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be against the DMCA to copy a CD to your computer at all? That was my understanding, surly people couldn't copy a DVD to their computer that'd be illigal too.

    Poor Americans, move to Canada.

    1. Re:DMCA by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Not a normal CD. Normal CDs do not have a copy protection scheme. Therefore, you aren't defeating it, or bypassing it at all when you copy it to your computer which means that you are covered by the fair use doctrine.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  51. cheap + OLED display + linux compat + avail now by jackstack · · Score: 1

    ... if you know where to look. Slap the "ipod" brand name, make it completely white, install restrictive firmware + jack up price 2x.

    http://store.yahoo.com/surpluscomputers/1gbmp3mp4a uv.html

    Warranty: 90 Days

    Description: Take music, pictures, and even movies with you ANYWHERE! Measuring only about 2 1/2 inches long this tiny little package packs some serious features. Plays MP3's, WMA, WAV and more! Supports video formats MP1, MP2, WMV and ASF. Records from a microphone as a voice recorder. Browse through JPEG's! There's even an FM Radio. All this in a device that fits in the palm of your hand. Take it anywhere! With it's stylish design and small size you can even wear it on your neck!

    Features:

    - Easy Carrying, pocket-size design
    - 1GB on board memory
    - USB interface
    - Display: 1" LCD
    - Built-in Microphone
    - Supports MP1, MP2, MP3, WMA, WMV, ASF, WAV, and JPG
    - Software converter converts multiple video file formats into MPEG4 compatible
    - USB Storage

    Package Includes:

    - Installation CD
    - Owners Manual
    - USB cable
    - Earphone

    Product Requirements:

    - Windows 98SE/Me/2000/XP
    - Mac OS X
    - Linux 2.4.2

  52. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  53. Video would be great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't understand why people think a video iPod wouldn't be sucessful. People listen to iPods on the subway and trains, instead of playing Tetris on thier cell phones while listening to their iPods I'd like to watch a movie on my iPod. I'd buy one.

    1. Re:Video would be great by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Thats great for you , since you take a subway or train to work. (kudos to those who do, but the transit system in the US is such that many do not have that option). However (assuming you are in the US) you are in the vast minority of the population, who mainly drives their cars to work. So for them (and me) the video iPod is relatively worthless. I will not be buying one.

  54. Google Video by Mindslinger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Forget feature movies for now. The obvious first step is to start off small and infectious. Watch Apple announce an integration with Google Video. There was an iTunes/Google rumour or hint going around. Video Podcasts, Viral videos, home-made clips, free shorts and portfolio clips The Star Wars Kid, Numa Numa, Leeeroy Let the first Video iPod trade in that content to get the ball rolling. This is a great way to test the water, check the popularity, security, and potential business models for video. Experiment with selling music videos at first, then after all that go for feature movies.

  55. Analysts by webrunner · · Score: 1

    Are industry analysts ever right except due to the statistically low chance that they'd be always wrong?

    --
    ADVENTURERS! - ANTIHERO FOR HIRE - CARDMASTER CONFLICT
  56. airport AV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone seems to be overlooking some sort of video-capable airport. If Apple does release music videos, people are relegated to listening to them through their computer speakers, as there is no way to sink the audio output and the screen with the airport. Seems to me releasing music videos, including a video iPod, would be pointless without an upgrade to the Airport first.

    1. Re:airport AV by retiarius · · Score: 1

      but the mac mini is already the incarnation of
      airport express AV, complete with storage,
      built-in quicktime decoders, and DVI/VGA out to the bigscreen ...

      oh, you want this dog's breakfast built into a smaller brick,
      even an ipod, with 802.11 b/a/n/g jammed in, too?
      hardly necessary, a networked ipod only needs
      bluetooth to scroll through content already mirroring
      the stuff in the ipod.

      now if apple wants to debut an ancillary product
      to handle widescreen 480p/720p/1080p H.264 content,
      i suggest an apple-branded 42" 1080p tv screen,
      just in time for the holidays.

  57. Disk Copy by lexarius · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can rip a DVD using Apple's Disk Utility program. What you get is disk image, suitable for burning if you have big enough blanks, or playing using DVD Player by mounting the image. Sure, it isn't a small file, but an 80 GB iPod could hold several. The problem is when you want to encode that into a different format.

    1. Re:Disk Copy by fbroooooz · · Score: 1
      This used to work, but with the latest version of DVD Player it isn't allowed. I think drag-install of an old version of DVD Player.app should do the trick.

      Frank

  58. I have iAudio X5 Video MP3 Player by XBL · · Score: 1

    Here (sorry no direct link) is the product website. It can play compressed MPEG4. What I have to do is rip a DVD to MPEG4. Then I use Cowan's software to properly compress and resize the movie (160 x 128) for the X5. The movies get down to about 100 MB in size, so many movies can fit on its 20 GB mini hard drive. On my Athlon 64 notebook, the entire process takes 4 HOURS :-(

    The screen is small, so it's better to NOT have the widescreen version of a movie. It just makes the movie even smaller. However, the small screen is still good enough to watch a movie when you are desperate for something to do on a plane or something.

    In the future I am sure there will be players with higher quality video playback and video out. That way you can plug in into your hotel room TV or something.

  59. Don't cry wolf by geddes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It has got to be bigger than minor upgrades to the current iPods. The invitations to this event seemed to suggest something big: "One more thing..." and if that one more thing is just a hard drive upgrade to the iPods than a lot of journalists are going to be mad that they made the trip out to california. By calling media events like this, Steve Jobs spends a lot of his social capital, the press is willing to come because they expect something awesome. If he dissapoints, he will be limited in his ability to do this in the future. I do not think he will disappoint. These upgraded iPods he may announce, yes, but there will be something bigger, it may not be an iPod, but it will be something cool. - Geddes

  60. Flash Players Suck. No, wait, they don't! by meehawl · · Score: 1

    Steve Jobs still believes video mobile devices aren't practicle

    Just like he and the other Apple drones spent a year or so dissing the expensive, high-end Flash players before introducing the ipod mini? I recall hearing quite a lot of apple fans parroting Apple's talking points: flash players suck, the capacity is tiny, everyone wants 60GB, and so on. And today what is Apple's current ipod de jour? The Nano - a high-end, expensive Flash player. In fact, Apple even ditched its hard disk mini player in favour of a flash player.

    Don't believe everything you hear. The only reason Apple is currently "down" on video is because it hasn't figured out to make a killing from it. Note that the desires of pod owners don't enter into it. It would be trivial to movie-enable colour ipods with a firmware update. But since Apple hasn't figured out how to *sell* movie content it sees no point giving people extra features. In the end, it's not about the ipod as an enabling device for personal media consumption and remixing but its positioning as a channel for Apple monetize.

    I prefer my media devices DRM-free, thanks.

    --

    Da Blog
    1. Re:Flash Players Suck. No, wait, they don't! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recall hearing quite a lot of apple fans parroting Apple's talking points: flash players suck, the capacity is tiny, everyone wants 60GB, and so on.

      You obviously weren't paying attention. The talking points were the existing flash players suck, the capacity is tiny, and everyone wants at least enough room to carry a hundred songs or so.

      Which was all true. Which was why the iPod trounced those little microscopic flash players that came with shitty human interfaces, no iTunes and 32 MB of memory.

      The iPod shuffle solved the problems of the flash players, and once the price of flash memory dropped to the point where it was practical, the iPod nano emerged.

      The problem here is not that Mac fans are fickle. It's that you lack the reading comprehension skills of your average fourth grader.

    2. Re:Flash Players Suck. No, wait, they don't! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Rio had 1Gb flash cards when the mini came out. Now I have 3 2GB cards.

      iTunes is okay for freeware, but smart people use better software, stuff that does music and video. Like the way my Achos players have done video for THE LAST FOUR YEARS.

      The nano is no different from any other of the fancy high-end audio/video flash players that you can buy in Walmart or Costco - it's just got the Apple name so nerds like you treat it as the second coming... shitty case and cracked screens and all.

      And it take a special breed of coward to insult people as an anonymous coward.

  61. Flash Players Are Stupid by meehawl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Jobs has said time and time again that he thinks the idea of a video iPod is stupid

    Just like he and the other Apple drones spent a year or so dissing the expensive, high-end Flash players before introducing the ipod mini? I recall hearing quite a lot of apple fans parroting Apple's talking points: flash players suck, the capacity is tiny, everyone wants 60GB, and so on. On stage during the mini inro, he even spent an abnormal amount of time dissing existing Flash players. And today what is Apple's current ipod de jour? The Nano - a high-end, expensive Flash player. In fact, Apple even ditched its hard disk mini player in favour of a flash player.

    Don't believe everything you hear. The only reason Apple is currently "down" on video is because it hasn't figured out to make a killing from it. Note that the desires of pod owners don't enter into it. It would be trivial to movie-enable colour ipods with a firmware update. But since Apple hasn't figured out how to *sell* movie content it sees no point giving people extra features. In the end, it's not about the ipod as an enabling device for personal media consumption and remixing but its positioning as a channel for Apple monetize.

    I prefer my media devices DRM-free, thanks.

    --

    Da Blog
    1. Re:Flash Players Are Stupid by joelhayhurst · · Score: 1

      I did your research for you. He talks about the flash players here: MacWorld 04 at about 1:50:45.

      He critiques the competition's low storage space (128-256mb), their clumsiness, and their poor interface. He does not in any way critique flash technology and instead says he wants to actively go into this high-end flash player market.

      Jobs hasn't contradicted himself regarding flash players. But nice try!

  62. mnb Re:Crazy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lame 3.90.3 with the --Alt-preset-standard switch sounds better than any CBR under 320 and has a size around 160. (depending on track)

    Well over 98% of the population can not ABX a between a lossless track and an APS track.

  63. You can legally rip HD-DVDs, but not DVDs (?) by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here's something I've been wondering the last week. In the flurry of HD-DVD vs. Blu-ray bickering in the press, "managed copy" keeps coming up. To make a managed copy of an HD-DVD, a computer rips it, strips off the AACS DRM, and wraps on a new DRM layer (MS will use Windows Media DRM, of course, and you'd expect other companies to use their own DRM layers). This is all legal and approved. So the studios will let us rip HD-DVDs (with conditions), and the studios believe that HD is much more valuable than SD. So why can't the computer industry convince the DVD CCA to amend their rules to allow managed copy for regular DVDs?

    1. Re:You can legally rip HD-DVDs, but not DVDs (?) by Kjella · · Score: 1

      So why can't the computer industry convince the DVD CCA to amend their rules to allow managed copy for regular DVDs?

      The CCA is much bigger than HD DVD. It was something as rare as a single industry-wide standard. I'm guessing the CCA/Blu-Ray members wouldn't approve because then they'd feel obliged to introduce it for Blu-Ray as well. There's no technical reason not to, with managed copy you have multiple DRM systems that can be cracked instead of one, but CSS is already broken. It might be something of a gamble from Blu-Ray's side, if the Managed Copy is broken, studios might favor Blu-Ray. OTOH, if that's a hit with consumers, well...

      Kjella

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  64. mod parent up by adpowers · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I looked at the comments of this article specifically to see if anyone mentioned HandBrake. It makes it super, super easy to record DVDs into H.264 format, which looks amazing. Of course, it does take for friggin' ever. It took like 20 hours to encode a movie to H.264 on my 1.33 GHz PowerBook (if I remember correctly). I can't wait for my family to get an iMac or something to make it faster. Hell, it might even be worth it just to get a Mac mini to use as a dedicated ripping machine, as to not type up your main computer.

  65. More formats, 5.1 by DarkHelmet · · Score: 1
    I wish the Ipod would have support for more formats, and a digital out for playing 5.1 surround sound.

    A lot of companies have tried making the ipod the central music player in a household, but the stereo limit is slightly annoying.

    I really don't think it'd take that much room to add the proper plug on the top of the ipod. Eh.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  66. Jobs outlined a few key issues: by Inoshiro · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Size -- other poratables are too big.
    Weight -- they also also too heavy.
    Content -- there is no content to put on it. Copyright issues are everywhere!
    Output screens -- they are simply too small for video.

    So how could that change?

    If the iPod could be made to do video playback without getting bigger or heavier, there was a source for content, and you had some kind of output, you bet he'd do it.

    For output, the 12" PB shows you how it could be done -- a simple mini-DVI slot would do it. Or you could use the existing iPod photo video out.

    For size, well, that's where technology will help. The playback could be done probably within a year or two. Even now, the technology could certainly fit into the relatively bulky iPod form factor (for a price).

    The content is probably the stickler. iTunes rips CDs, but could it rip DVDs? What about importing other movies you download? There are no online download services.. I suppose it could sync with iMovie like it syncs with iPhoto, but obviously Apple would like to have a real content download medium. No longer would you pay 60-100$ for a season of TV on DVD; instead, you could get it downloaded for 20$. That'd be worth it.

    I doubt the media producers are cooperating.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  67. heh... yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ripping a dvd to an mp4 isn't complex. It's trivial. Just look at Handbrake. Apple probably has a version of iTunes that does just this already.

    So why say this? Is this a leak at all? I think what's really going on is that the studios all want to do their own thing as far as marketing movies online and so negotiations with Apple have suffered for it. Apple knows that nobody wants to subscribe to 5 online movie stores and that people WILL buy a video iPod. So they "Leak" this info about how the movie studios are the ones in the way to put pressure on the studios at the negotiating table. Same thing behind them saying record labels are 'greedy' for wanting variable iTMS pricing and a cut of iPod sales. Their contract with them is up soon so they want the labels to feel like if they don't play ball, the market will be pissed at them.

    So the "complexity" argument is bullshit. They probably have a version of iTunes or some next generation audio - video library app ready to ship that already does all this dead simple. They just need the market to kick the studios in the nards before they ship.

  68. Just Use Ipodlinux by Cronos1388 · · Score: 1

    URL:http://ipodlinux.org/The Ipodlinux team has a working videoplayer for the ipod. It only plays about 5-10 minutes of a clip and you have to convert the videos to uncompressed AVIs it still is a video player. Currently the 4-g ipods aren't supported but there are GNUs for it

  69. the website is suspicious by Jormundgard · · Score: 1

    To quote cringely (who quoted someone else)

    first try http://www.apple.com/%5Bwhatever garbage you wish]

    then try http://www.apple.com/movies

    does it mean anything? or does it fan the rumor flames?

  70. Two More Things... by iwoj · · Score: 1

    I have it on good authority that the announcement on Wednesday will actually be announcing two related products: a new iPod and a pair of bluetooth sunglasses. These glasses will have micro video cameras mounted stylishly on each arm that stream the sounds and visions of your life wirelessly onto a new 100GB iPod.

    Life, stored as two video+audio channels in VCD quality requires about 1.3GB/hour. So your new 100GB video iPod will hold about 5 days of waking life which you can review at your leisure with the ease of the scrollwheel. Clicking the centre of the scrollwheel will also bookmark important moments in your day for easy access later.

    But that's not all. These bluetooth sunglasses will also feature stereo retinal projectors which will enable users (and I mean "users" in all the senses of that word) to vididly relive moments from the past. Built-in wifi in the new iPod will also let users trip out watching flashbacks from other peoples' lives who are nearby or even across the world. Imagine being bored on the bus or metro when an adhoc Rendezvous network of these devices puts you in right in the middle of someone else's life.

    Time and place shifting digital out-of-body flashbacks, brought to you by Apple.

    A new version of iMovie will help you edit your memories and control public access to your visions.

    You heard it here first.

  71. Disks are slower than that by don.g · · Score: 1

    While I'm sure the FireWire interface can cope with 100MB/s, I'm pretty sure the disk in any available iPod can't be written to at anywhere near that speed. So your calculations may be a little bit out.

    --
    Pretend that something especially witty is here. Thanks.
  72. The iPod is Soo 1990s... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sony PSP, all it needs is a built in HDTV tuner and it would be perfect!

  73. Shuffle by meehawl · · Score: 1

    their clumsiness, and their poor interface.

    One word: Shuffle.

    Two years brings a lot of changes. At the time he was busy dissing those players, there were 1GB players available. In fact, a player I have from that era now takes 2GB cards. I like progress. Progress is good. The nano represents progress of a sort for Apple - I think absorbing most of the Creative mp3 player design team has worked out well. It's nice that Apple finally has a pretty good, albeit quite expensive, flash player, even if it did take it a few years to get it right.

    But there are other players since then that have advanced significantly, adding video, games, emulators, PDA functions, wireless, expansion, and so on. For myself, I like my personal media tech to push the envelope, and to not be so hostile to open-source firmware enhancements.

    I'll take your word for the video. I don't really spend "probably on average 75-80% of my waking day" on the Internet, but let me see...

    --

    Da Blog
  74. Re:The iPod is Soo 1990s... by 4phun · · Score: 1

    Thou has not played with the iPod NANO. The PSP is a BRICK compared to the funtionality of this thing the size of a business card you would drop in your wallet! Not to mention the battery life of teh NANO compared to that clunky PSP. Vic

  75. Rockbox Video - 67fps on 12MHz SH1734 by meehawl · · Score: 1

    That's not enough to decode fullres MPEG4 in realtime. Heck, today's xScale PDAs can barely do that at around 500mhz. It would need a faster CPU and/or a dedicated custom decoder chip.

    Remember, it's a small screen.

    The open-source Rockbox people managed to add a video player to the 4-year-old Archos hardware, and it's using a CPU most often found in washing machines (12 MHz SH1734). Now, the video is greyscale, but it is impressive to see it working, and with full stereo audio synch, at 67 fps.

    I'm expecting great things from the port to iRiver: a 140MHz ColdFire 5249 is a whole different kind of beast. It's already enabled a pretty spiffy Gameboy emulator,

    --

    Da Blog
  76. more silly speculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok.. I can't believe I am being sucked into this sillyness, but here goes. Please understand that I think we have probably already nailed what is really going to be announced Wednesday, since every reasonable base has been covered, but inspired by the velvet curtains I want to add the following crazy and unrealistic fantasies:

    Some kind of camcorder with and ipod dock. The video goes straight to the ipod HD. It works as an audio recorder and digital camera too of course, hell, let's say it also works as a portable digital VCR too.

    Alternatively, an ipod with a camera built in.

    A mac mini with a built in projector.

    A highly portable projector or display that connects to a video ipod (or computer). Is there such a thing as a high definition projector?

    Some kind of weird-ass head set or goggles to let allow you to actually see something when you play a movie from your ipod.

    Some kind of lap top-like device but smaller and simpler - maybe with a 6 or 8 inch display. Billed as a high end multimedia ipod and hand-held.

    Apple home media center with massive HD display, ipod dock and computer built in. Includes surround speakers, bluetooth remote, keyboard and pointing device.

    Apple is getting into the ISP and/or cable or satellite TV business. Perhaps pay-per-view movie service or Itunes store for sattelite TV, new software for using the mac as a tivo type system, all seamlessly integrated of course.

    The merger of PIXAR and Apple to yield a major studio, media producer and record label, maybe with the help of the other (Beatles) Apple.

    er... oh, oh..... I know..... its a waterproof floating G5 powerbook you can use in the bath, in fact, to deal with the cooling issues, you can ONLY use it in the bath. The great part is that it keeps the water nice and warm.

  77. more pointless speculation and la-la land fantasy by invasifspecies · · Score: 1

    Ok.. I can't believe I am being sucked into this sillyness, but here goes. Please understand that I think the community has probably already nailed what is going to be announced Wednesday, since every reasonable base has been covered. Nonetheless, inspired by the velvet curtains I want to add the following unrealistic fantasies: Some kind of camcorder with an ipod dock. The video goes straight to the ipod HD. It also works as an audio recorder and digital camera too of course, hell, let's say it also works as a portable digital VCR. Alternatively, an ipod with a camera built in. A mac mini with a built in projector. A highly portable projector or display that connects to a video ipod (or computer). Is there such a thing as a high definition projector? Some kind of weird-ass head set or dorky goggles to allow you to actually see something when you play a movie from your ipod. Some kind of laptop-like device but smaller and simpler - maybe with a 6 or 8 inch display. Billed as a high end multimedia ipod and hand-held. Apple home media center with massive HD display, ipod dock and computer built in. Includes surround speakers, bluetooth remote, keyboard and pointing device. Apple is getting into the ISP and/or cable or satellite TV business. Perhaps pay-per-view movie service or Itunes store for sattelite TV, new software for using the mac as a tivo type system, all seamlessly integrated of course. The merger of PIXAR and Apple to yield a major movie studio, media producer and record label, maybe with the help of the other (Beatles) Apple. er... oh, oh..... I know... I got it...... it's a waterproof floating G5 powerbook you can use in the bath, in fact, to deal with the cooling issues, you can ONLY use it in the bath. The best part is that it keeps the water nice and warm. When the curtain opens on Wednesday, Steve will be there in a tub, splashing around with the new machine and a rubber duck.

  78. Sources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a wholesale distributor of Apple products and have been for a little over a year. Trade companies overseas in China and Singapore have recieved information that a vPod will be released Wednesday. Say what you will about video capabilities being pushed back, but I strongly believe this is going to happen on the 12th. We all know something big is about to happen, we'll see who's right. I am not currently taking any job offers. Thanks.

  79. Supposedly real-Ipod Video on Apple-South Africa by Coopjust · · Score: 1
  80. ok... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone was wrong....

  81. Ahem by joelhayhurst · · Score: 1

    I'll be over here, eating my hat.