Slashdot Mirror
200gb Hack for iPod Nano
romka1 writes "For people who think their Nano doesn't have enought space for their music there is a hack walkthrough to get 200 gigs on your Nano. Warning some assembly required" For some reason this tickled my funny bone this morning. Enjoy.
funny how I felt the same way when I read it on a lazy Thursday afternoon.
Why stop at 200GB? You could use a 500GB drive and have 150% additional capacity with zero gain in size. I'm a little disappointed that the nano cases won't quite fit anymore though. As the article states though, this is one mod any nano owner cannot do without.
A B A C A B B
I've always wanted an iPod Kilo.
Note that the 200gb capacity enables you to store about 50 000 pieces of music. If this capacity is filled with illegal "warez" mp3s, you can be fined up to 75 000 000 USD. (204 800 megabytes, 4 megabytes per song, 10 songs per CD, average CD price 15 USD).
Who else besides the author has 75 million handy?
"There's nothing like adding an extra 196 gigs to my iPod Nano so I can listen to all my favorite British Invasion bands." -- Oscar Wilde.
It's good to see that more and more people are realizing that the Uncyclopedia is the true source for knowledge.
Much like the black widow, after the battery life of the Nano completely drains, the Maxtor Diamond will attempt to eat the iPod Nano for sustenance
You bastards!
An iPod Macro, just what I've also been holding out for!
Apparently someone at Slashdot has invented time travel and failed to post about it. Or maybe they traveled into the future and posted about it then.
Slashdot: 24 hours behind every other site or your money back!
Try this link.
12 minute battery hack for iPod Nano!
Does anyone know of a hack to get thet battery life on the 200Gb Nano up from 6-minutes? I'm thinking maybe a car battery could be used for power. Any thoughts?
I think I'm going to wait for a Raid hack...
What other people think of me is none of my business
In all seriousness, size is the only reason I haven't bought an iPod. I bought one in 2003 and gave it away by the end of the year to a coworker. I don't want to just carry a few songs with me. I want to carry my entire collection. And not just MP3s and AACs, but OGGs, too. Theoretically, I would like to store and listen to all of my music on a single device. I don't want to store 100% of my collection on an external drive, plug it into my laptop, connect the ipod to my laptop and copy of 20% of my collection at any one time.
So as soon as these suckers hit around 300gbs, I'll be buying one.
My gmail account has some 827MB worth of crap on it. I'm filling it at pretty close to the growing rate.
Remember that 1GB HD that you'd never fill up?
The 32MB of RAM that was workstation levels?
The fast 14.4k modem?
If you think education is expensive, you should try ignorance -- Derek Bok, president of Harvard
I've actually been known to do that - for my cameras...
It seems Uncyclopedia forgot to upgrade their server with a 200 Trilobyte WAN connection. You'd think they'd put their own good advice to use and avoid the Slashdot effect?
Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
Photoshopped from ArsTechnica. Remove if sued.
See pictures of tits
Coral Cache
Wah Sig!
Oooh, a whole WEEK ago! You MUST be cool reading ALL these sites EVERY minute, just WAITING for that FRESH scrap of news!
There is an Outside. BELIEVE in the Outside.
Google cache!u ncyclopedia.org/wiki/Ipod_Nano_200gb_Instructions+ &hl=en&client=firefox-a
http://72.14.207.104/search?q=cache:i22oAfgJYvgJ:
'Go for the eyes, Boo, go for the eyes, aaarrrrrrrr!' -- Minsc
Ees a joke. Look carefully at the "photo" showing the wiring of the nano to the HD. Can you say "sloppy photoshop"?
7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
Its a shame you lose some portability needing to power the drive and all, I would have liked to see a nice car battery attatched supplying the DC 12v.
Wah Sig!
Coral Cache Stop breaking Uncyclopedia you heathens.
can't read... don't own a nano anyway so it doesn't matter too much; just wanted to feed the curiousity. my biggest question is, and always has been: Can Slashdot be slashdotted?
- My question is: Can Slashdot be Slashdotted? -
Or maybe try these links: main page, first subpage, second subpage, third subpage. They're slow, but they do load eventually.
Darn you all! You slashdotted my wiki host!
Good old Wikia, providing free MediaWikis (at http://www.wikicities.com/), and you had to go ahead and kill it. I hope you're proud of yourself.
RIAA will be happy to sell you 200 GB of songs, think how fast they will get rich.
I saw this in Ars Journal more than a week ago, you're not alone.
This is old "news".
coral cache got slashdotted
And I might not have pointed out that it was 8 days ago if Slashdot wasn't "News for Nerds..." There's just something about that word... oh yeah, it's the "New" part!
Please ignore any obvious problems in this post.
There is an Outside. BELIEVE in the Outside.
Somehow... you almost made me cry (or I am making a PhD you Insensitive clod)
Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
Google cache
You joke, but it wouldn't be very hard. Not that long ago I saw a hack (in Macaddict magazine, I believe) on how you could run an iPod Shuffle off of a 9V battery. Basically you just take a USB extension cable and cut it a few inches away from the female end, connect the 9V battery to a solid-state +5V voltage regulator (Radioshack) and connect that to the appropriate wires in the USB cable. Wrap with duct tape and enjoy.
If you could find a +5V regulator that would work with just 1V of overhead, you'd be in business -- just replace the 9V with four D-cells. Or heck, why screw around with flashlight batteries. Get yourself a sealed lead-acid brick and you're in business. All it needs is a shoulder strap.
"Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
He's probably a Neowin reader.
~The TwoTailedFox posts again....
I thought this was a serious article for 5 whole seconds. I feel stupid now.
You are reading a copy of my copyrighted post.
OK, the idea of hacking an iPod nano is silly, but in all seriousness I would love to have a component-sized iPod for my stereo system. If I had a full-sized iPod with a dead battery and half a clue on how to convert between 3.5" and 1.8" drive cables...
Write Only Memory: Another pointless blog.
Too offset you getting this news 8 days before me, I'm going to wait 8 more days to read the article. that way it evens out..
(maybe by then the site will have recovered from being slashdoted..)
Why didn't you submit it after you read it then?
:P
Slashdot operates and gets stories because people like you search the web and submit interesting things you find.
I hold you personally responsible for the lateness of this article.
liqbase
There are many other hacks for the Apple iPod family available already. From the first generation iPods as well as for the iPod Shuffle and iPod mini. You may also find links to hacks for accessories like cables and headphones and batteries.
The old Archos players are bulky, but they do go to 120GB when you drop in the latest Seagate 2.5" drives. Pretty sweet. It's nice being able to add $100GB to your DAP for only a hundred bucks or so.
It's just a pity that their expansion has to stop here because their disk controller is not LBA and only reads up to the ~127GB limit.
Da Blog
(Make it growable, redundant and auto-backed up and you have Google's next project!)
the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
A very clever observation, you deserve a cookie.
- These characters were randomly selected.
"New?" I don't know about you, but the only time I see the word "New" is in the spelling of the word "News."
News, by definition, is a report of recent or unkonwn events. I would put 8 days well within the recent timeframe. And I didn't know about it. So I would say this definitely qualifies as "News" for me.
The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
Back in the spring, I saw a "Coming Soon" announcement for Uncyclopedia which said It's like Wikipedia, only you can make shit up!
PAT
SEO Test: TIGI und SEBASTIAN - Online Shop - V
Feel free to visit this link while you wait for me (I'm a slow reader).
Does anybody else get tired of the seemingly interchangeable way that bytes(B) and bits(b) are used by many people?
>Would this be a bad time to mention that all digital audio is by definition lossey?
Wait. What makes "digital" lossy but non-digital non-lossy?
Pick any analog method of recording and duplication. Its lossy. Now toss in playback equipment, speakers, ears, etc.
I don't see how your neo-luddite comment applies nor why it should be modded up.
Arguably, digital methods are non-lossy over time considering current analog recordings (tapes, LPs) over time simply disintegrate causing all sorts of loss, while digital data can be reproduced without loss over generations and onto different digital media thus avoiding the aging problem. Copy that Office 2000 CD all you like, after the 8th generation you arent suddenly going to lose spell checker. Same with digital audio. Now copy that audio tape 8 times and tell me its not lossy.
According to Moore's law, and asuming that chip complexity is directly proportional to storage capacity, if the largest memory cards available today have a capacity of 2 GB, we would be seeing TB cards in about 9 years... of course there is a physical limit to this, that may be reached before 9 years have passed.
Hmm.... Lets find out!
Rirelobql xabjf gung EBG-13 vf gur yrnfg frpher rapelcgvba rire, ohg jbhyq lbh jnfgr lbhe gvzr npghnyyl qrpelcgvat vg???
You seem to have forgotten to read 1) the slashdot article text 2) everyone elses posts. This is a JOKE, as seen by the monty python foot.
I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
I was going to go do the math myself, but AC beat me to it.
coding is life
I think I just contributed to the "slashdot effect". The page is unavailable as the Server probably melted from hits....
Sorry, that's 18 years, not 9.
Here is what would be a lot more useful:
- buy a 20GB iPod
- buy a 80GB 1.8" HD
- upgrade the HD in the iPod
This would be awesome if you fill up the HD but don't want to shell out $$$ for a whole new unit. Is this possible? I'd love to buy a 20GB model knowing that if I ever run out of space I can upgrade the HD.
___
If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
The Shannon Sampling Theorem states:
To put it into term that you can understand, if your ear cannot detect frequencies higher than 22.05 kilohertz then a sampling rate of 44.1 samples per second can perfectly reproduce any sound you can hear.We don't see the world as it is, we see it as we are.
-- Anais Nin
this month. Check it out.
photosMy Photostream
I realize the iPod has a user friendly interface for handheld operation, but a component-sized music player would likely be operated by remote. I don't see too many remotes with click wheels, nor do I see too many component systems that are not housed within an entertainment center several feet from the entertainee. Unless you're absolutely in love with Apple's audio codecs, the FLAC website has several links to other commercially available players which support many formats. You may have made an excellent prediction in the next direction of iPod development. A home iPod device would be simpler and look better than plugging an iPod into line level jacks on a receiver.
I'll be your candy shop of infinite deliciousity if you'll be my discotheque of endless rump-shaking.
It's an obvious fake. The photos are taken from the Ars Technica autopsy of the Nano. If you look closely at the picture with the "attached" ATA board, it's clear the wires are Photoshopped in.
Didn't you know that it's a script that accepts and rejects your stories based on keywords, the status of your slashdot subscription and a random accept/reject flag? Obviously you either forgot to subscribe, spam the proper keywords or just plain failed the randomly scripted check.
Only after all that does it go to a live reviewer to be duped ^_^
You need a FREE iPod Nano
... the 'tested' battery life should convince you otherwise:
iPod Nano Retail 8:23 play time
upgraded 200gb iPod 0:06
So you'd get to play about 1.5 of those 50,000 songs between recharges...
Brandishing Dangerous Logic
The RIAA has sued EVERY maker of ANY new technology. And they've kept up the senseless, relentless assault until one of their existing or future clients figures out a way to make money doing it. They don't care about who's progress is being retarded or even how many people get hurt.
Thee **AAs are in, exactly in, and ONLY in, the business of stopping progress. They have nothing else to sell. And they are selling it... If they weren't getting paid, they wouldn't be doing it.
The **AAs have nothing else to sell. Not creativity, not talent, not artistry. Just the bloody-mindedness that lower life forms bring to the pursuit of food. The **AAs just hire lawyers, people who are moral relativists and only see things in terms of conflicts that make them money.
Go after the **AAs customers. Write to the heads of all the companies and tell THEM to stop treating you like criminals or you'll stop buying. And then STOP BUYING!
Then and only then will you be rid of DRM and zones and restrictions.
MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
Who are they kidding? :D It kinda looks like crap with the HDD being at least 4 times bigger than the iPod...
Oh, and I love that comment too: We found in our benchmarking results that the addition of the ATA hard drive adversely affected battery life. Big surprise, really!
1. For most people (and the word "most" here refers to at least 99% of the world), the iPod *would* hold their entire collection of music.
2. I will never, ever, ever run with a non-flash mp3 player again. If you were a runner, you would understand. The hard drive will inevitably fail, probably within just a couple of months of frequent use.
Thankfully, Apple knows that your personal preferences don't accurately represent the market for mp3 players. If your preferences did accurately represent the market, you better believe that your magic device would exist. It would be large, bulky, and ugly, but it would sure fit your entire music collection.
The iPod Nano was unique, one of the reasons of which was that it was flash memory-based, correct? Then wouldn't hacking it to use a hard-drive be counter-intuitive, and a step in the wrong direction? Though it may have its uses, it's just a step back from solid-state media.
Debugging? Klingons do not debug. Bugs are good for building character in the user.
That's true for theoretical conditions but in practise it's not quite that good. The maths assumes infinitely precise sample resolution and perfect sampling points. In practise a CD is limited to 16-bit resolution and due to the vagaries of electronics the sampling points will often drift by a microsecond or two from their ideal times.
That's why when they master the CD they purposefully use a low-pass filter to cut-off the frequencies above approximately 20kHz. They lose 2kHz of frequency range that theoretically could be stored on the CD, though nobody can hear much in that range anyway so it's not a big loss. This is also why 20-bit and 24-bit recordings at 96kHz are considered useful. It's not because audiophiles (morons) have ears that can hear dog-whistle frequencies, but because it allows the encoding/decoding electronics to be simpler (simpler analogue filters) and therefore cheaper.
I see it as a slap in the face for those people who say things like "the iPod should have an CF expansion slot!" or "it should have video!!!111!one"(actually it does now), because that's not the selling point of the iPod.
Unbelievable, the number of "omg, it's fake!" posts here...they're almost 1:1 for all of the "omg, teh server has been slashdotted!" comments that haven't been modded as redundant. Really, if you made it through the first sentence of TFA without realising that it was a joke, then how you managed to turn your machine on this morning is beyond me.
200GB on iPod Nano?? More like iPod Nano on 200GB.....
My paragraph that you quoted was an oversimplification. The post I was responding to was claiming that a near infinite sampling frequency was needed to perfectly sample a finite bandwidth signal. That post also specified a "purely theoretical" context.
I'm confident that you will agree with me that after all of the real-world engineering details are taken into account, a finite bandwidth signal can still be captured with a finite sampling rate although that rate needs to be higher than twice the highest frequency in the signal due to the engineering concerns.
We don't see the world as it is, we see it as we are.
-- Anais Nin
Sure. I wasn't disagreeing with you, just expanding on the point.
Way too cool! A couple of phone calls later, and I'm in business!
Call now for your pre-fabbed kit! Simply send* your Nano to:
Ipod Upgrade
200 G byte way
Newport Beach, CA 93447
916-767-3395
Hurry! Operators (^ * / + - ) are standing by in order to take your order.
* A core charge is assessed for any dead or non-returned Ipod nano's.
I realize they can revert it back, but you have got to admit this is still a goddamn nuisance, and that Slashdot is apparantly full of assholes.
Given the quality of some of the readership here, maybe Slashdot shouldn't link to Wikis.
Assholes. You know who you are.
I owe the author much for introducing me to this site. The entire thing is a wellspring of humor. I shall never want again.
And of course it's fake, you 'tards.
1. Take an Ipod Nano ......
2. Use 1 roll of black electrical tape
3. Use tape to attatch a car to the Ipod
4.
5. Profit!
It's a PORTABLE IPOD!
You moved your mouse. Please restart Windows for changes to take effect.
blah....that was a perfectly good technical pun....no sense of humor :P