Slashdot Mirror


Another Ars Ultimate Budget Box

Some nice Friday afternoon reading for you; Ars Technica has another go at the Ultimate Budget Box, a cheap no-frills PC for minimum cash output. From the article: "Look around inside most corporate offices, where most computers need to handle a few Office documents and light Internet use. They don't need to be able to burn CDs or handle 3D-intensive games, but they do need to be reliable and affordable. Lots of consumers out there probably want a similar box--an appliance that lets them get onto the Internet, take care of e-mail, and create a few documents. For them, being able to burn a CD-RW would probably be nice, but anything beyond that is an extra. Low-cost, reliability, and quality are key. That is what the Ultimate Budget Box is about: not skimping on components, but not loading it up with features either." The final price? US$525.46

321 comments

  1. FIRST TROUT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I AM A FISH!

    1. Re:FIRST TROUT! by Furmy · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've already been modded "offtopic" today, but that's a damn funny post.

    2. Re:FIRST TROUT! by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a trout.complex to me...

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  2. I didn't RTFA, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't see how a $500 computer is the 'ultimate budget box' -- seeing as how dell, hp, and your neighborhood shop all sell boxes that "surf the internet" and run office apps for $300-$400.

    Maybe I should have read the article, because I feel like I missed something here....

    1. Re:I didn't RTFA, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      seeing as how dell, hp, and your neighborhood shop all sell boxes that "surf the internet" and run office apps for $300-$400. These boxes tend to use crap components. The ARS box is no-frills but with solid components.

    2. Re:I didn't RTFA, but.... by MoonBuggy · · Score: 3, Informative

      That price is including a reasonable TFT. The box itself is a little under $350, less if you already have mouse, keyboard, speakers etc.

      It also has PCI-Express when many of the cheapest Dell and HPs I've seen don't have any way to upgrade the graphics.

    3. Re:I didn't RTFA, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take a look at www.cheapestpc.com.au. $AUD379 - and this time I checked its got an 80Gb hard disk. More than most people would need.

    4. Re:I didn't RTFA, but.... by enjerth · · Score: 1

      I bought an eMachine AMD Athalon 64 3400+ with 1 gig ram, 200 gig drive, DVD burner, XPMCE etc. blah blah for $500. Complete system less the monitor. With a $100 PCI-Express video upgrade, it's a pretty fair gaming machine for $600. $525 for a basic box isn't a very good deal.

    5. Re:I didn't RTFA, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also has PCI-Express when many of the cheapest Dell and HPs I've seen don't have any way to upgrade the graphics.

      http://www.microcenter.com/single_product_results. phtml?product_id=0210744

      Equipped with 16 x PCI express...$350 w/$50 mail in rebate.

    6. Re:I didn't RTFA, but.... by InvisiBill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That price is including a reasonable TFT. The box itself is a little under $350, less if you already have mouse, keyboard, speakers etc.

      It also has PCI-Express when many of the cheapest Dell and HPs I've seen don't have any way to upgrade the graphics.

      Last summer, my parents bought my brothers a SlickDeals Dell. P4 3.0GHz HT, 40GB, 128MB or 256MB (lowest option, bought cheaper memory elsewhere), integrated graphics. No AGP or PCIe, but for them, a PCI FX5200 was enough. $350 included the 17" LCD. Bought another 512MB for about $50, so figure a total of $400. Quite a few of the Dell deals do indeed have PCIe now. Considering that most of the PC is an integrated Intel mobo, there's not really much room for "substandard components" either.

      And that includes tech support from Dell. That's not much, but it's better than none. It also includes a copy of XP Home (you may or may not care about that).

    7. Re:I didn't RTFA, but.... by onthost · · Score: 1

      A local computer store in my town offers a Intel box for $350, comes with 256 megs ram, 80 GB, a 32 mb video card, onboard sound, and a celeron 2.33 Ghz. For a internet/office box more than enough. Hell my Pent 700 with 200 mb of ram stills runs damn fine. Oh this is in Canadian dollars as well. Also any computer store will have used CRTs for $40-50, why go with a LCD for a budget box. Even dell sells a monitorless computer with the same specs as above, but 512 mb ram for $350. And to the guy who said it has PCIe, who cares its a budget computer!!

    8. Re:I didn't RTFA, but.... by ruhk · · Score: 1

      Yeah. You're kinda missing the point. The ArsTechnica
      systems guides aren't about pushing a built-box solution.
      They're for people who are going to go and build a system
      from off-the-shelf parts. When you get that, you don't get
      any of the volume discounts that a company like Dell can
      get.

      Of course, most of those $300-400 systems from Dell don't
      have monitors, and use proprietary motherboards and other
      proprietary parts.

      --



      404 Error: .sig not found.
    9. Re:I didn't RTFA, but.... by MojoStan · · Score: 1
      The box itself is a little under $350, less if you already have mouse, keyboard, speakers etc.

      It also has PCI-Express when many of the cheapest Dell and HPs I've seen don't have any way to upgrade the graphics.

      That may be true for Dell (since they use Intel chipsets exclusively), but HP offers something close ($350 after $100 rebate) if you choose the right cheap model. The Pavilion a1330e has that all-important PCIe x16 slot that's missing from so many budget PCs. By default, it uses integrated Radeon graphics (ATI chipset), but it has a PCIe x16 slot.

      Other differences at this price (good and bad):

      • price includes Windows XP Home (vs no OS)
      • Athlon 64 3200+ (instead of Sempron)
      • Socket 939 (instead of Socket 754)
      • 40GB hard drive (80GB is $30 extra)
      • DVD-ROM or CD-burner (DVD-burner $50 extra)

      Of course, I'd still choose to build my own and I'd rather not play the mail-in rebate game.

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

    10. Re:I didn't RTFA, but.... by onthost · · Score: 1

      Dell might use proprietary motherboards, but local outfits like http://www.kingstoncomputerplanet.com/ offer a $350 computer, no monitor. Thats Canadian by the way. Also if you are getting a budget computer, why not a good off lease monitor from a local outfit, for say $50?

    11. Re:I didn't RTFA, but.... by Skynyrd · · Score: 1

      I'm with you here.

      I just helped my dad get a new computer.

      3400+ Sempron
      512 GB RAM
      160 GB HD
      DVD burner
      onboard video good enough for whatever he does (no FPS)
      good onboard sound and speakers
      media card reader
      USB 2.0 & Firewire on the front and back
      17" CRT
      Good keyboard, OK mouse
      3 year "if you can hose it, bring it to us and we'll reinstall the OS for you" warranty from the local Staples
      10/100 NIC
      modem (the only PCI card installed on the box)
      A ton of free software (my choices) Firefox, Thunderbird, Picasa...

      It's an HP/Compaq

      $600 out the door ($500 after a mail in rebate)

      He may get a 17" LCD one of these days (hmmmm, he has a birthday in March)

      It's fast, reliable, has a warranty, uses off the shelf parts, and since I didn't build it I don't have to deal with too many problems after he learns the OS and 3 or 4 apps.

      For his use, it was far smarter to buy one, as I doubt you could build one and buy a copy of Windows. He has some GPS/mapping software that requires Windows, and there's no way in hell I'd recommend a Linux box to him anyway (am I wrong here?).

      On the other hand, I really enjoy the ARS guids, and have used them in the past to speed up my research for a good box.

    12. Re:I didn't RTFA, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think these "DellDeals" PCs are cheap, wait to see what you can get with volume discounts on the corporate side...

      Posting anon for obvious reasons, but a bottom of the line optiplex with 15" TFT is about $200 if you could subtract the OS and software. Which you can, but most businesses need XP Pro and Office Pro (another $800.)

    13. Re:I didn't RTFA, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      512 GB RAM

      I'd buy that for $600. Hell, I'd buy two.

    14. Re:I didn't RTFA, but.... by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      I don't see how a $500 computer is the 'ultimate budget box' -- seeing as how dell ...etc... sell boxes ... for 300-$400.

      Well, it comes with an LCD in the $500 price, or a flat crt in the ~$450 price. Those $300-400 are headless usually. Doesn't have an OS in the price, so that might be a factor.

      Oh, and it has 512mb ram (2x the $3-400 boxes) a decent motherboard that actually supports things (you can put in a good graphics card without a mobo upgrade, those cheepo boxes don't have AGP even usually) and is probably a heck of a lot faster processor too.

      This is the "ultimate" budget PC, as in the Best Bang for your Buck, as opposed to the "Ultimate Budget" PC, the computer for those who simply want the cheapest.

    15. Re:I didn't RTFA, but.... by dknj · · Score: 1

      yep, at my last job we bought 150 dell optiplex gx270s and got them for roughly 50% off. this included 75 19" ultrasharp lcds..

  3. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  4. You mean the Mac Mini, right? by Frobozz0 · · Score: 0, Troll

    *ahem*

    Apple's already got that covered. The basic Mac mini is $499, and will likely come with a Core Solo processor soon:

    http://www.apple.com/macmini/

    --
    "Politicians find new names for institutions which under old names have become odious to the people."
    1. Re:You mean the Mac Mini, right? by Hrodvitnir · · Score: 1

      FTA: "An important final note: the Ultimate Budget Box is complete with a monitor, keyboard, mouse, and other accessories. If you do not need a monitor or other items, feel free to subtract them from the price.

      Mac Mini does not come with that stuff. Of course, if it's between a Mac Mini and a Windows machine, the cost of the OS would probably even that out.

      --
      "There are more important things than stopping terrorism. Upholding the Constitution is one of them." - Ars Forumer.
    2. Re:You mean the Mac Mini, right? by sootman · · Score: 1

      I love Minis (I own 2) but Ars' $525 price includes a 15" Acer LCD ($178) and $16 for keyboard & mouse. (Also, $81 of that is for XP Home.) And Dell has boxes for $249. ($349 minus $50 MIR minus $50 for no monitor.) Improving its specs (512 MB RAM, DVD burner, 1 year warranty) still brings it in at $408. I won't split hairs about FireWire, modem, keyboard, OS, etc. if you won't. :-)

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    3. Re:You mean the Mac Mini, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That Mac Mini is $499 without a monitor and 40GB hard drive.. Ars box is $525 with an LCD and an 80GB drive.

      Biotch.

    4. Re:You mean the Mac Mini, right? by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Plus keyboard, plus monitor, plus mouse... that basic PC's price includes an LCD monitor.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    5. Re:You mean the Mac Mini, right? by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      The price does not include the OS. check the article:

      Total price: US$525.46 with LCD, US$461.02 with CRT, not including shipping and handling (2/21/2006, no OS)

    6. Re:You mean the Mac Mini, right? by technothrasher · · Score: 2, Informative
      I love Minis (I own 2) but Ars' $525 price includes a 15" Acer LCD ($178) and $16 for keyboard & mouse. (Also, $81 of that is for XP Home.)

      Not to nitpick, but XP Home actually isn't included in Ars' price. It's only mentioned after the $525 total. So with XP Home, the total comes to $606. You're right though, it does include the LCD.

    7. Re:You mean the Mac Mini, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget $130 for your yearly Mac OS X upgrade to keep your mini running snappily!

    8. Re:You mean the Mac Mini, right? by Misagon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I actually sold my Mac Mini because I did not like the OS, to build a new Linux/x86 computer out of almost precisely the same components as in the article, except for a few things: What I liked the most about the Mini was that it was 1) small, 2) stylish and 3) quiet.

      1) is almost impossible with PC components, if you want any reasonable performance. I will be choosing a MATX board, but I am trying to find one that is smaller than 24.4×22 cm and which still has Firewire and DVI/TV out like the Mac Mini.
      The PSU will be external like for the Mini. (btw. Mac Mini's PSU gets very hot.. and it does not have any sink drain either)

      2) I am solving by building the case myself. I am no stranger to working with aluminum.

      3) I am trying to solve by replacing the internal heat sinks and chassi fan(s) with one large heat sink that will become one side of the case. Heat transfer from each component to the heatsink will be through copper blocks, but some heatpipe-like features in these blocks would be better.
      Of course, this decision requires that all i/o is integrated. ..
      But there are still drawbacks compared to the Mini, while costing as much:
      - still twice as big as the Mac Mini,
      - the Mac Mini has dedicated graphics memory while the integrated PC boards share memory between CPU and GPU with reduced performance.
      - the Mac has a slot-in DVD. I can not find any reasonably-priced slot-in DVD burner anywhere close... (I live in Sweden, btw)

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    9. Re:You mean the Mac Mini, right? by arminw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ......Apple's already got that covered. The basic Mac mini is $499....

      MacMall sells this for $474, but gives an extra $20 rebate, a free printer and a 4x5 graphics tablet.

      Instead of a crappy MS XP home you get a real OS, better than XP-professional and you also get the iLife programs.

      Add the same keyboard, monitor, speakers and mouse as listed and you get a media capable computer that'll also work great for browsing the web and simple office jobs. The mini is silent, but how much noise does that 300 watt power supply make? The mini is run by a small 85 watt power supply.

      Sometime this year the new Intel powered mini will make this so called "Ultimate Budget Box" totally obsolete and expensive.

      --
      All theory is gray
    10. Re:You mean the Mac Mini, right? by geekee · · Score: 1

      "Apple's already got that covered. The basic Mac mini is $499, and will likely come with a Core Solo processor soon:
      "

      The mac mini 1.2GHz G4 is extremely slow compared to the machine in the article, which has a Sempron 2800+, plus the mac mini has only half the hard drive space

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    11. Re:You mean the Mac Mini, right? by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Aopen has a case/motherboard sized almost to that of the mini Tigerdirect I can't help you with the other components. personally I prefer OS X. I can get any linux app I want I can run x windows apps, plus I have all the driver support including wireless, which an be a hit or miss depending on which wireless card you buy. personally though i am wanting for version B of the Intel Mac Mini unless something better comes along.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    12. Re:You mean the Mac Mini, right? by will592 · · Score: 1

      Why not run linux on the Mac Mini?

      http://www.sowerbutts.com/linux-mac-mini/

    13. Re:You mean the Mac Mini, right? by MBCook · · Score: 1
      My local Microcenter was recently running a special where that $500 Mac Mini would come with an LCD (15", not Apple) and I think a memory upgrade for free. Personally I think they are trying to clear out stock for the Mac Mini Solo (or whatever it gets replaced with using the Intel chips) if Apple will annouce those next week (otherwise, maybe they just had the Minis sitting around and wanted to get them moving off the shelf again).

      Either way, if you hunt around, you can get a Mini with LCD and such for around $500 (as the cutstom built Ars box did), but if you build your own you won't get iLife and some of the other great software out there for Macs (and if you say "Games", you shouldn't be buying a Mini in the first place).

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    14. Re:You mean the Mac Mini, right? by ParadoxDruid · · Score: 1

      What you needed was the Koala Mini from System76.

      It's the exact same size as a Mac mini, just as stylish, and the same price.

      But lots of upgradable options and uses Ubuntu (or Kubuntu) Linux as the OS.

      I just ordered one myself after a friend recommended their laptops (she loves the one she got from them).

      --
      This statement is solely an opinion. Kindly take it as such in all cases.
    15. Re:You mean the Mac Mini, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mikem is that you?

    16. Re:You mean the Mac Mini, right? by shut_up_man · · Score: 1

      Daily Tech posted a preview of the AOpen MiniPC just today - it's their answer to the Mac Mini, and worth a quick look. Not sure I like the blue color, but like one of the comments says, there's always spray paint.

    17. Re:You mean the Mac Mini, right? by swillden · · Score: 1

      That's really cool, but just like the Mac, it lacks one thing to be a great home theatre front end: digital sound outputs. Throw an S/PDIF output, either coax or optical, on that and you'd have a great little Myth front end.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    18. Re:You mean the Mac Mini, right? by arminw · · Score: 1

      .....and if you say "Games", you shouldn't be buying a Mini in the first place....

      We bought a mini for our teenager's school work and he has a few older games such as Myth, Battlefield 1942, Sims, Starcraft, Rainbow Six and the Age of Empires series. He doesn't complain too much about how well they play. The certainly work better than they did on the old purple iMac.

      --
      All theory is gray
    19. Re:You mean the Mac Mini, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Add the same keyboard, monitor, speakers and mouse as listed and you get a media capable computer that'll also work great for browsing the web and simple office jobs.

      Which would make your Maci mini solution (with keyboard, monitor, speakers and mouse) much more expensive than TFA's budget box (price included those extra items). For the price of your Mac mini solution, TFA could have made a much better mid-range box.

      The mini is silent, but how much noise does that 300 watt power supply make? The mini is run by a small 85 watt power supply.

      Not much. The case has a big, temperature-controlled, slow-moving (and quiet) fan over the CPU socket and the Sempron destroys the G4 in performance per watt.

      Sometime this year the new Intel powered mini will make this so called "Ultimate Budget Box" totally obsolete and expensive.

      And the new mini will still not have a PCIe x16 graphics slot, PCI/PCIe slots, desktop hard drive, and DVD burner (at this price range). And Yonah-based Wintel Viiv desktops will also be available when the new Intel minis are released. Are you really this dense?

      Today's Mac mini also has an archaic CPU architecture and inferior integrated GPU.

    20. Re:You mean the Mac Mini, right? by misleb · · Score: 1

      I imagine the lack of Airport extreme support would be a problem for some. And I wonder how well the 3D video is supported.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    21. Re:You mean the Mac Mini, right? by MBCook · · Score: 1

      I agree. My PowerBook works fine for games now and then too. But if you want a real gaming box, then a Mini or the PowerBook G4s just were not gaming computers.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    22. Re:You mean the Mac Mini, right? by Arandir · · Score: 1

      Ditto. Reading the blurb I was expecting something in the $300 dollar range. But at this price you might as well get a Mac Mini. It's significantly smaller, uses significantly less power, and comes with an OS and software.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    23. Re:You mean the Mac Mini, right? by MojoStan · · Score: 1
      Daily Tech posted a preview of the AOpen MiniPC just today - it's their answer to the Mac Mini
      Actually, that's the successor (Core Duo/945G chipset) to their current MiniPC that's been available for some time already. According to the specs, the current one seems to meet most of his requirements:

      • Since it uses an Intel chipset (915GM) and integrated graphics (GMA 900), he should have no problem getting Linux drivers from Intel.
      • The CPU (Pentium M or Celeron M) is cool, quiet, and better than the G4.
      • It has DVI, FireWire, and TV out (including component video).
      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

    24. Re:You mean the Mac Mini, right? by arminw · · Score: 1

      ....then a Mini or the PowerBook G4s just were not gaming computers...

      A high powered, expensive general purpose computer is a huge waste of money for playing games. I told our teenager that I'll buy him a new x-box360 plus one game of his choice if he brings home a "boring" report card of all "A"s. He is working very hard for this. The x-box, together with the Mac Mini is still a cheaper and better solution than an expensive, high performance PC which includes of course a top notch video card. Also, other members of the household can use the mini to surf the net while he plays on the x-box.

      --
      All theory is gray
    25. Re:You mean the Mac Mini, right? by che.kai-jei · · Score: 0

      i have always been intrigued by the meta-mega-heatsink concept and recently my attention was captured by this probably well known copper pipe case mod:-

          http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,1915934 ,00.asp

      making the copper pipes structurally functional like above and also creating a framework longer than a little more complex than necssary [increasing surface area] and filling themn with water in a design that would naturally cool the computer even under heavy load.

    26. Re:You mean the Mac Mini, right? by blackomegax · · Score: 1

      Mhz != performance. though, the laptop HDD will kill performance.

  5. $525??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    $525?? Might as well buy a Dell for $249 if all you want it for is basic stuff. I hate Dells as much as the next tech but they are cheap and more than adequate for basic stuff (and even some games) for the price.

    1. Re:$525??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, for $525 you can get a much nicer machine. Heck, I would get a Mac Mini for that price.

      You can buy the ultimate budge pc from Fry's Electronics and Outpost for $199, and still pocket $300 after paying taxes!

      http://shop1.outpost.com/%7BD1Y2sVQJ2SSw3LRG1Z2tTB yLG9R1Yc2T0HwLFmpL7kKHqTfDhQS1!-1219162780!NONE!11 40824310314%7D/product/4368965

  6. final specs by prockcore · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's a quick glance at the final specs:

    80 gig SATA HD
    DVD+-RW
    520 megs DDR
    Sempron 2800
    Onboard GeForce 6100
    15" LCD
    +case+speakers+keyboard+mouse

    1. Re:final specs by theJML · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I also find it's important to point out that the OS is extra!

      Sure that's cool for people like me that are going to throw gentoo on there, but what about gramma, she doesn't want linux... (yes some are ok with that, but for the majority, it's just not the way for the masses yet!). so we're well over 600 bucks if not more for a full version of something, close to 700. Since when is that cheap or budget?

      --
      -=JML=-
    2. Re:final specs by AuMatar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Grandma really doesn't care. She just wants it to work. If anything Linux is better for her, its more stable, fewer viruses, and easier to do remote admin on.

      I'm currently in stage 2 of 3 in getting my family off of Windows. They're already using Open Office and Firefox. They're actually happier with them than they were with IE and Office- when I told them I could block ads with Firefox their faces lit up. The next time they buy a computer, I am installing linux on it- just leave them a firefox and an office icon on their desktop and they won't care about the difference in colors. And it'll be a win for them, as I can just ssh into their box if they have problems. I'll just give them a no-privlidges account on it and I'm done.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    3. Re:final specs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... people actually pay for Windows?

    4. Re:final specs by prockcore · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I also find it's important to point out that the OS is extra!

      That's because this machine is targetted towards businesses. The businesses already have site licenses.. they don't need to buy the OS.

    5. Re:final specs by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

      Gentoo is free.

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    6. Re:final specs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What was stage one? Cleaning up the basement and coming upstairs?

    7. Re:final specs by agurk · · Score: 1

      And for Office use you almost double the price with MS-Windows + MS-Office.

      The difference between a DVD burner and a CD reader is about $20 why mention it at all?
      When the article then goes and adds this non essential dvd burner?

    8. Re:final specs by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      For those who are actually curious, it was replacing IE after their computer got completely hosed by spyware. That gave them the confidence to trust me to pick some other apps to replace (like office). I'm replacing their apps piecemeal, one at a time to not overwhelm them with change all at once.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    9. Re:final specs by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 1

      520 megs? Congradulations for finding the elusive 260 megabyte DIMM...

    10. Re:final specs by Neil+Blender · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity, what are you going to tell them when they ask about iTunes or TurboTax or something like that? I did the same thing for the same reason (IE to Firefox) on my wife's PC but I wouldn't think of replacing the OS because it's limiting. And before you list out all the linux alternatives, I know them, I use them. QuickBooks beats the shit out of GNUcash but I still use GNUcash. There is no trustworthy OS tax software. There are few games. I dual boot for the occasional game only and taxes.

    11. Re:final specs by blackmonday · · Score: 1

      What happens when your family buys a new printer, digital camera, iPod, DV camcorder? I hope you're in close proximity to them, and have spare time.

      To avoid being tech support, I usually recommend a Mac to my family, then they buy a Dell and I refuse to help. Problem solved!

    12. Re:final specs by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Linux printer support for HP is pretty good. They aren't the type to buy ipods. And the digital camera- just have them pop the card in a card reader, and prepare the proper scripts to mount it for them. Attach it to a nice icon and label it "camera". In addition, this happens, at MOST, once a year? Once every 2? Still a huge gain.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    13. Re:final specs by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      That can work for some people, but there's quite a few people that want to do more than email, web browsing, and IM. My dad has a digital camera, likes printing up business cards and other printshop kind of things, and works with geneaology. Accomplishing all those things in Linux isn't going to be easy.

      I have switched him over to Firefox and Thunderbird, and he seems quite happy with those. I don't plan on switching him to linux since Windows 2000 does just about everything he really needs.

      --
      AccountKiller
    14. Re:final specs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I also find it's important to point out that the OS is extra!


      Umm, duh! You have your choice in motherboard, memory, storage, display, and so on. You choose the cheapest one to make a budget box. If you didn't have choice there'd be nothing to talk about. The same goes for the OS. You have your choice. You can choose the $200 OS (and add in another $200 for an office suite) if you want to. I think that is ridiculous. I'll choose a $0 OS and $0 office suite, thank you very much.
    15. Re:final specs by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      THey don't use itunes, they use allofmp3.com. Which will work from Linux, although the great AllofMp3Explorer doesn't. I'm going to try and script a replacement for them though (buy via the website, then run the dler to get the files).

      TurboTax- a real accountant. Gets better returns than TurboTax did.

      QuickBooks- a checkbook. They never trusted the computer for that, and I see no reason to move them off a working solution.

      Games will be the last issue. Luckily, they don't play high end games, they play card games and things like Snood. I can find free replacements for those, or hook them on similar/other ones. Java based web games will still work.

      I'm not saying there aren't some apps that are hard to/can't be moved. But very few people use tax software compared to the number of people who hire an accountant/do their own. Same for quickbooks vs not using a computer. The vast majority of people won't miss it because they never used it. And I do find that 90% of the "problems" people find with apps on Linux boils down to "the way I'm used to is different" rather than real problems.

      As for tax software specificly- the problem is the tax laws are so complex. OSS could write a rules engine easily. Its getting CPAs to write the rules for free thats the problem (and I wouldn't trust rules not filled in by a CPA).

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    16. Re:final specs by arminw · · Score: 1

      ....The next time they buy a computer, I am installing linux on it....

      It's wonderful for your family that they have such a great computer expert like you at their beck and call. What about all the families that don't have a built in IT person to get them out of the inevitable jams they get into. For them it's either a cheap Dell with Windows or a Mac Mini. If money is really tight, a working CRT monitor can be gotten used for very little or even for free. A Mac mini is definitely a better system for anyone who doesn't have a smart computer guru like you in the family.

      --
      All theory is gray
    17. Re:final specs by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      THe problem with Linux for the average newbie isn't that its hard to use- its that its hard to setup. I wouldn't trust the average Joe to install it. Of course, I wouldn't trust them to install Windows either. Luckily, the PC manufacturer does that for them. If there was a company out there selling preconfigured Fedora boxes, I'd say that would meet their needs better than a Mini or a Dell box.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    18. Re:final specs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They plug them in and everything works? Where have you been?

    19. Re:final specs by rjmars97 · · Score: 1

      or you can just ask a college student who can get a copy of windows xp pro for $4.50, like i can at my universitys bookstore. thats how i got copies for my family when they needed them.

      --
      Heuristically programmed ALgorithmic computer
    20. Re:final specs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux, Ubuntu to be precis, has worked incredibly well for my computer-illiterate parents.

      The new "Add Programs" menu in Ubuntu allows them to select an application with a click, type in their user password and install it without having to trapse around websites like they've done in the past with the Apple and Windows machine.

      Printer and digital camera worked out of the box. I gave them a site or two with lists of hardware supported by Ubuntu, so if they do by a scanner they know which one to get. Easy and they love it. Ubuntu is also more widely known than Apple in the area they're in, so they can easily pay for support when I'm not around. So far the box hasn't needed touching. They aren't upgrade or gizmo fanatics - they just need a machine to work and a machine that doesn't slow down. They also want a box that doesn't have an interface that confuses them (like the OSX Finder did), they can upgrade with a click of a button without forking out $$$, and one that doesn't have multitudinous and completely different ways of installing software (OSX, Windows).

      They were always intensely confused installing software, having to track it down on websites, not knowing what's cracked software and what's not. They are 1000's of kilometers away also, and so I can't help them easily. Instead they have spent a ton of money in the past paying for antivirus software, upgrading their machines and having it 'cleaned' intermittently.

      Linux is a fine choice for those that just want a computer like they want their car. By it and drive it for years without issue.

    21. Re:final specs by killjoe · · Score: 1

      There are lots of printers that are not supported by the Mac. In fact since Mac uses CUPS every printer compatible with the Mac is compatible with linux.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    22. Re:final specs by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      As for tax software specificly- the problem is the tax laws are so complex. OSS could write a rules engine easily. Its getting CPAs to write the rules for free thats the problem (and I wouldn't trust rules not filled in by a CPA).

      why's it have to be free? Tax software is a definite value add proposition.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    23. Re:final specs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hark! I hear the sound of somebody who hasn't use Linux in years.

      Printing/Scanning

      Support for most printers is there out of the box. Both my HP Laser and my Epson Printer/Scanner were supported out of the box on the current and previous versions of Ubuntu. That's printing *and* scanning.

      Digital Camera

      Again, on the latest version of Ubuntu, there's an option in the main menu, under Graphics, called gtkam which you might notice because it has a little picture of a digital camera next to it. Click it and you can interface with most digital cameras. No driver installation necessary. Alternatively, just plug your memory card into your card reader and an icon for the card will appear on your desktop. I'm having a hard time imagining how they could make it any simpler.

      iPod

      Several of the Linux audio players have in-built support for the iPod. The default media player for Kubuntu, amaroK, does, as does the default media player for Ubuntu, Rhythmbox.

      DV Camcorder

      OK, this one is supported but you're going to have to install an application to deal with it. Luckily, Ubuntu comes with a graphical utility to install programmes. All you have to do is tell it to install Kino and you're sorted.

      So please, when you're going to diss Linux, at least have the decency to try it first.

    24. Re:final specs by really? · · Score: 1

      My mother, 66 this year, has been a HAPPY Linux user for over a year. It went like this:
      M: Now that I have more free time, I want one of them computer thingies.
      Me:OK, will make you one and bring it by newxt week.
      (I used my last spare Epia board and assorted bits to make computer for her, loaded Centos on it, and delivered it.)
      M: It looks a little different than the one "friend's name here" has.
      Me: Yeah, I just made it, their is several months old. (Evil grin)

      Everytime she needes "something" I ssh in, and make sure there is a "something" link on her desktop. If she has a problem I fix it. She thinks it's remote magic. :-)

      The only problem is that her friends want me to use my "remote magic" on their windows boxes as well ... I can usually do it, either RDP or VNC, but it's not as easy as I would like it ...

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    25. Re:final specs by speed_of_light · · Score: 0

      If anything Linux is better for her, its more stable, fewer viruses, and easier to do remote admin on.

      Your grandmother does remote admin? 1337 hax0r!

    26. Re:final specs by kuzb · · Score: 1

      Until someone says "Hey, you should do your taxes on the computer! I got this copy of turbotax and it's great!"

      Then Grandma comes to the realization that Linux isn't all that great because it fails to do what she wants it to do.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    27. Re:final specs by Goldfinger7400 · · Score: 1
      In fact since Mac uses CUPS every printer compatible with the Mac is compatible with linux.

      That is innacurate. Mac OS uses both its own native drivers AND cups to get greater compatibility with older printers. And by now there ought to be vendor supplied drivers for every current printer, if not then companies are missing out.

    28. Re:final specs by grappler · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu is also more widely known than Apple in the area they're in

      I'm really curious - where is that?

      --
      Vidi, Vici, Veni
    29. Re:final specs by jred · · Score: 1

      Not a shill, but I use http://taxactonline.com/ . Works fine w/ just about any browser, and on the first page they tout IE, Firefox, AND Opera support.

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    30. Re:final specs by kuzb · · Score: 1

      I appreciate the heads up, this is good to know. Although, it doesn't help me (or my Grandmother) in Canada.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    31. Re:final specs by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Because most open source projects don't have a budget.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    32. Re:final specs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two options, either the entire Tax software could be proprietary and you have to buy it, or the software could be opensource, but you just pay for the tax rules. Just because it runs on Linux doesn't mean it has to be free or open source.

      A third option is to try and get your government to make free software to do taxes.

    33. Re:final specs by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      That's pretty much my stand, as well. AuMatar is willing to take the time to setup a computer for grandma and put what he wants on it. I'm not (well, first reason being my grandma died in 1980). My family wants computer help? I tell em to buy a mac. They buy a PC? SOL, even though I am more comfortable on a PC than a Mac. Saves me time and headaches. If they were to buy a Mac, I'd tell em to take it to the Genius Bar... :)

      Some people get off on telling people what to buy and what to run and where to go, I'd rather concentrate on sex, drugs, and rock-n-roll with the occasional bread-baking. :)

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    34. Re:final specs by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      A third option is to try and get your government to make free software to do taxes.

      The IRS is doing that to a certain extent. I think, though, that it really only covers the simplest cases - single W2, renting, standard deduction.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    35. Re:final specs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ive installed Kubuntu on 11 computers the past 9 months.
      From those, 5 were on old P3's and 9 were for retired people who are friends of my parents. Half of them never had a computer before and 2-3 of them hated turning the damn thing on because it was always crashing...BSOD.

      I talked to the ones like my dad who've been using Win for a few years and all have asked me why i didnt get them to switch earlier.
      ALL of them have changed their desktops more than once since they like to.

      For the stuff they do; web, email, watching video, listening or ripping or burning mp3, a little word processing.... it is perfect.

      So between my 4 year old and the retired folks, I havent found one person yet who has found Linux to be harder to use and the ones who were still on Win98 email me every week to tell what a joy it is to have a computer that works.

      Its a small sample but these were very low tech people who wouldnt know a ram from a pci card, the exact kind of people that we keep fearing will not understand Linux. Which I believe is wrong.
      These people should be easier to reach because of price and also their use is pretty limited. Its the gamers and people who have to have a certain apps on Windows (I run a dual boot for that reason) that are going to be harder to convince.

  7. Dell does it cheaper by budartagnan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If all I want is CD burning capability, internet surfing, and word processing, for myself or, more likely, for a family member... Dude, they're getting a Dell.

    1. Re:Dell does it cheaper by Hrodvitnir · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it's a lot easier to RMA a part to New Egg and switch it out yourself than to try to deal with Dell Customer Support if anything goes wrong.

      --
      "There are more important things than stopping terrorism. Upholding the Constitution is one of them." - Ars Forumer.
    2. Re:Dell does it cheaper by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Yeah but watch the shipping price?

      $399!.... but with a $250 shipping charge. Hmm

    3. Re:Dell does it cheaper by ScottCooperDotNet · · Score: 1
      It depends on who you're getting the system for.

      In a corp. environment having a single system monoculture means you can easily roll out an image with everything preconfigured the way you like. Dell's lower end offerings seem to have some capacitor and hard disk issues from time to time, so getting a sub-500 system is asking for problems.

      As for Dell's home offerings, their tech support will ask you to jump through an hour of troubleshooting before sending a $15 part. Not including reinstall media (make it yourself?!), and bundling tons of trialware reduces their value. I used to recommend Dell because they didn't load their systems with crap the way other companies do.

      If you want a good Dell for your home, get a business system, since those aren't loaded up the way the home models are. Dell may do it cheaper, but what is your sanity worth?

    4. Re:Dell does it cheaper by mriker · · Score: 1

      That's what I'm thinking... why bother building your own machine when you can order a pre-built, warrantied machine for at least as inexpensively through Dell? Of course, Dell is Intel-only, but when we're talking about a non-gaming rig, it doesn't really matter. This is one of the lamest news items I've seen on Slashdot in a while.

    5. Re:Dell does it cheaper by RevDobbs · · Score: 1

      Very good point... I priced out a bottom-end Dell, skipped on the monitor... and they still wanted to charge me $250 for standard shipping! Ended up goint to Best Buy and picking up a cheap HP box (with beafier specs) for less than the price of the Dell, before shipping & handeling.

      Really, though, when it comes to the bottom-bottom end PCs -- which are more than enough for the vast majority of users out there -- you just can't build it as cheap as Dell or HP. That $525 price on the Ars article is sans OS, which adds at least another $80 for an OEM copy of XP Home; or you can walk into BB, pick a $400 computer and $150 monitor off of the shelf, probably get a rebate on top of that, and bring home a system that you can setup an half an hour instead of half a day.

      The only redeaming feature of building your own is that the cheap, name brand kit (like mentioned in the Ars article) is usually of a slightly better quality than the manufactured PC's -- that last cheap Dell I purchased for mum didn't even have an AGP slot; it was on-board graphics or a PCI card :-/

    6. Re:Dell does it cheaper by loraksus · · Score: 1

      No, not really.
      If you look around for a bit, you'll be able to find free or cheap ($25 or so) shipping deals on lower end dells. If you just go to the dell site and click the "I wanna computa" button, you're going to get screwed.
      It took me less than 2 minutes to find a Dimension 5150 Desktop for $599 + $24 shipping = $623
      Pentium-4 3.0GHz HT, 512MB DDR2, 80GB SATA, 16x DVD+/-RW, Intel Video
      10/100 Ethernet, 19" E196FP Analog Flat Panel
      Yeah, it's $100 more, but has a 19" flat panel. If you look around, you can find something cheaper with a smaller display.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    7. Re:Dell does it cheaper by budartagnan · · Score: 1

      Dell is offering free shipping on their cheapest computer on their site at the moment. The normal shipping charge for it is $99. I've never seen an exorbitant shipping fee on the level of $250 from Dell. I think you're exaggerating.

    8. Re:Dell does it cheaper by RevDobbs · · Score: 1

      Well, that's kinda the point...

      Dell can't make money unless the charge ~$550 a PC, so they lure you in with a $400 unit but charge unreasonable handling fees. Sure, you could by more PC and get break on handling, but now you're looking at a PC that is 50% more expensive than the one you wanted, and even the cheaper PC has three times the horsepower you need to surf the web.

    9. Re:Dell does it cheaper by loraksus · · Score: 1

      Whatever you say ;)
      I just know I bought 12 dell desktops with monitors for $330 each for a client last summer and didn't pay a dime in shipping. That said, they have increased their prices a bit recently. If you look at the fatwallet hot deals forum, you'll see similar come by every week or so, often during the weekends.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  8. How is this news? by Kasracer · · Score: 1

    Over the past few years I have seen every hardware web site to one of these "budget boxes" every couple of months.

    How is this news?

    1. Re:How is this news? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      It's Friday. It's slow. Too many of us are stuck in the office reading Slashdot instead of hitting the slopes or going to the beach. Go figure.

    2. Re:How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it is from a site that many people read and because it's their newest revision of said-type articles. It's new.

  9. LCD? by PurpleMonkeyKing · · Score: 1

    They could save over $100 if they bought a CRT. Or they could get a nice CRT with at least 1600x1200 resolution. I have an LCD myself, but if you are building a budget PC, wouldn't you want the get the most "bang for your buck"?

    1. Re:LCD? by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      No. Budget means saving money.

      LCDs take less electricity to use than CRTs. Ergo, they wind up costing less over the course of their lifespan.

      Plus they're smaller, easier on the eyes, and have the nice benefit of looking much pricer than they really are.

    2. Re:LCD? by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      LCD's are the most bang for your buck over the first year or two of use. The power consumption is so much higher for a CRT that the electricity costs easily overwhelm the price difference. This is especially true if you get a modest, clean LCD instead of a larger CRT with bigger display, but fuzzier images: for most text editing and web browsing the LCD is actually easier to tune and manage. It also leaves you a lot more useful desk spave for other purposes.

    3. Re:LCD? by tukkayoot · · Score: 1
      Maybe their rationale is that LCDs are a better value overall, due to the fact that they consume a lot less space, less power (though it'd probably be a good long while before the price difference is recouped through electric bills) and are easier on the eyes than CRTs.

      Going from an CRT to an LCD is a very noticable and appreciable upgrade for most people. It's not like adding a somewhat better processor that will give you an imperceptible 17% improvement in performance or whatever. Depends on your needs and preferences, that extra $100 is very well spent.

    4. Re:LCD? by miscz · · Score: 1

      The price gap between CRT and LCD is too big to cover electricity consumption difference. And I wouldn't call them easier on eyes, it depends but 85hz refresh rate is quite comfortable and possible on every normal monitor. Also, there are other benefits of CRT monitors, for example I can't stand poor colours on LCDs compared to even cheapest CRTs. And you can get CRT monitors for much lower price, I've bought my 19' flat CRT (NEC) for less than 100$, sure, it's second hand, it's old, but it beats every LCD I've seen in terms of image quality and supports 1280x1024 which is more than adequate for my needs. LCDs look nicer tough but it's a budget box.

    5. Re:LCD? by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      I disagree- CRTs are far easier on the eyes. LCD's give me eyestrain if I'm looking at them for extended periods (say a half hour). CRTs have no side effect- I can stare at them all day without harm. CRTs also tend to have much better video quality. I use LCDs only if I have no other option available.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    6. Re:LCD? by rts008 · · Score: 1

      "No. Budget means saving money."
      Good point.
      What I'm wondering though, how much overall cost diff is there when you "save" $100.00 (US) on cost of monitor with CRT, compared to the $ spent powering CRT vs. LCD over the expected life of both- I have all CRT's on my home network, with all PC's set to power down the CRT's after 10 minutes of inactivity- How big is the diff in $electricity savings between 4 LCD's compared to 4 CRT's over the expected life of the monitors?
      I honestly don't know- I am truly asking.
      It seems that if the CRT's are off, the energy requirements should not be too high.
      Where is a good source to find the answers? ( I would really like to know)
      Personally, I can't afford to switch to all LCD's here (4 PC's on home net), but maybe I should be looking to phase out the CRT's sooner than I wanted to- You are absolutely right about budget means saving money! (initial cost + operational/maint. costs over expected life HAVE to be factored in!)

      Currently, I have not *noticed* a jump in my electric bill, but to be honest, I have not really paid that much attention to it (in other words, nothing has jumped up and ripped my face off!), but maybe I need to look closer.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    7. Re:LCD? by cyxxon · · Score: 1

      Well, totally different story here. About a year ago, I began to get headaches in the evenings after staring on a CRT all day at work and then doing some gaming at home on a CRT as well. It all went away after I bought an LCD at home and also got one in the office. I would not ever buy a CRT, and since on March 1st I am beginning a new job, I thought to myself "damn, I hope they have LCDs", and was relieved when today I got the mail telling me when to be in the office for all the first-day-stuff, and it closed with "...and a notebook will be prepared for you". Bad keyboard, yes, but LCD.

    8. Re:LCD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Number of misconceptions in your post:
      1) refresh rate: for LCDs refresh rate is the MAXIMUM refresh rate. If screen does not change much, then refresh rate is 0, WHICH IS A GOOD THING! LCD pixels stay lit basically forever, and do not blink on/off 85 times per second as on a 85Hz CRT (no stream of electrons scanning the pixels to light them up). This is why LCD is so much easier on the eyes: LCDs basically look like a printed text on paper, no freaking blinking/buzzing.

      Why does blinking make your eyes tired? Well, it has to do with the way bipolar cells in your retina work. Get a neuroscience book out, or just crank up the good ole PubMed.

      2) electricity cost: at 8 hours per day on-time, CRT will consume $0.35 more per week than an LCD. Given holidays/weekends, downtime, etc., a business would probably save around $15-20 in electric per year by switching to an LCD. More so considering the staff can work longer with the screen!!!! In three-four years, LCDs will pay for the difference. On the other hand, air conditioning in the summer can cost a pretty penny, so LCDs are also better. Up North though, perhaps CRTs are the way to go?

      3) Better colors: CRTs fade quite a bit during the first year. Our stockroom is filled with the burned-in images of login screens, etc, on CRTs... So, LCD will keep better colors throughout their lifetime.

      4) Beta-rays are generated by CRTs. (Basically, fast-moving electrons from the electron gun). That's the reason you can get static buildup on CRTs.

      So the only reason for a business to get a CRT is: savings shortterm! (or give employees a change to play quake at high FPS ;-)

    9. Re:LCD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry you can't afford a decent CRT that will provide >85Hz vertical refresh rate. The ghosting and poor color quality with your LCD are much better, for sure. Staring into that backlight all day is just wonderful for your eyes.

    10. Re:LCD? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      The two most important pieces of the computer are:
      1. The display.
      2. The keyboard / mouse.
      These are the bits that the user will be directly interacting with. If there isn't enough RAM, or the CPU is too slow, then the user experience will be a bit slow. If the keyboard or monitor is no good, then it will actually be painful.
      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  10. $500US?? by Cervantes · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Craaaap, I say. I can build budget boxes for $500 CDN.

    Admittedly, I haven't RTFA, but I really don't care to. Just seeing that price tag is enough to make me believe it's another piece of overpowered crap. If you just want net browsing and occasional burning, then a Sempron 2xxx + is more than enough for you, and anyone who tells you otherwise is trying to screw ya.

    --
    If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
    1. Re:$500US?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to go really cheap, an older motherboard, a Pentium III 700MHz or more, and 512MB PC100 RAM is the ultimate budget box. In many ways it was better than my Athlon XP 2800+ machine.

    2. Re:$500US?? by gfxguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You know, I don't understand what people mean by budget box anymore. One of my computers at home is an 800Mhz Duron with 256MB and it does everything they "require" from their budget box, it's the computer my wife uses to email, surf, etc. when one of the kids is playing on the "good" box. She hasn't complained. I use it when I crawl out of my office.

      Eliminating games and high end applications (like video editing), you could do with a lot less of a machine than that one, even.

      I mean, come on... maybe they are used to XP or something, because I remember upgrading my Win2K box a couple of years ago to 512MB specifically to do video editing, and now they are saying you can't do with less than 512? With prices so cheap, it's definately worthwhile, but to claim that you need more than 256MB... to do what? Surf? Email? You've got to be kidding me. That's like saying you need an SUV to do grocery shopping... on the other hand, it seems a lot of people really do believe that, too.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    3. Re:$500US?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Admittedly, I haven't RTFA, but I really don't care to.
      > [...]
      > a Sempron 2xxx + is more than enough for you

      If you did you would have found that
      1. a Sempron 2xxx+ is exactly what they end up with
      2. a large part of the final price went to the LCD display

    4. Re:$500US?? by DoninIN · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I do 90% of my internet surfing on a 500mhz celeron. That has a street value of what? $5?

    5. Re:$500US?? by HunterZ · · Score: 1

      I think they designed the box with XP in mind, as it really needs 512MB of RAM as a minimum in order to function well. If you do *any* gaming or anything else more memory intensive than surfing web pages and listening to MP3s, XP will bog down with less than 1GB. A lot of people who (like me) build their own boxes are now starting to actually put in 2GB of RAM in order for more memory-intensive games to be able to coexist with WinXP without causing lots of swapping to/from disk.

      That Ars box is really not any good for games (would at the *very* least need some kind of 3D card, as I don't think on-board chips are quite there yet - although I could be wrong), so I agree that by better defining its intended uses they could have decreased the cost even further.

      --
      Arguing about vi versus Emacs is like arguing whether it's better to make fire by rubbing sticks or banging rocks.
    6. Re:$500US?? by empvirus · · Score: 1

      Dude, a Celeron D would be fine for that kind of budget machine, too. And at newegg, I betcha I could pick up a decent motherboard for only 40 bucks. And monitors? CRT is definitely the way to go for for your wallet. The more recent monitors are alot better than the old ones used to be. And a casing? My dad picked up a cheapo casing w/power supply for like 20 bucks like a year ago. These guys do not know how to save money.

      --
      Sometimes I comment just to hear myself typing.
    7. Re:$500US?? by danimrich · · Score: 1

      I agree with you.

      I guess they absolutely want to be able to run XP on that machine, which is a legitimate requirement because it is a de-facto standard in most environments. Of course, it is incredible that we throw such a lot of computing power at simple tasks like web browsing, writing letters and sending e-mails. For all of these tasks, the computing power of a second generation Palm PDA would be more than sufficient (if you don't care about Java and Flash).

      --
      where's all that Karma?
    8. Re:$500US?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he might have purchased a decent case, one that dosn't sound like a jet engine, like so many of the cheap cases.

    9. Re:$500US?? by supermank17 · · Score: 1

      Uhh, you might want to RTFA. They are using a sempron.

    10. Re:$500US?? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Exactly. If someone I know needs a budget box for basic tasks I won't start by pricing out new parts. I'll start looking at used computers. Places that sell used coporate workstations will have higher-end used PIII boxes (800Mhz-1Ghz, 256-512MB of ram, AGP video) can be had for under $100. That's plenty for someone who wants to do basic web browsing, and can run Windows XP or a modern Linux distrobution just fine. Lower end P4 boxes are about $200. Even after adding in a DVD-RW drive ($35) and a USB2.0 card ($20), it's still a good deal.

    11. Re:$500US?? by daemonenwind · · Score: 1

      "$500 CDN."

      So that's free like beer, right?

  11. Sorry podboy .. no monitor included with mini by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no monitor included with the mini. His price includes a 15" LCD.
    Also there is double the HD space and a DVD writer (mini doesnt have a writer)
    No worries though .. I'm sure the appleturfers will mod u up anyway.

    1. Re:Sorry podboy .. no monitor included with mini by ReverendLoki · · Score: 1

      Actually, MicroCenter happens to be having a sale on that right now. Mac Mini, 14" LCD, keyboard, optical mouse, and Epson all-in-one printer - still $499. I still wouldn't want to buy one personally, but...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    2. Re:Sorry podboy .. no monitor included with mini by Arandir · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, when I was there a few weeks ago, they had the same deal, but with an extra harddrive (that's stackable with the Mini) instead of printer. Either way it's a much better deal than you can get at the Apple Store.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  12. Sempron + MB w/ Video -- Drives Too... by mythosaz · · Score: 2, Informative

    They keep listing these at ~150 for the board and processor. Fry's regularly sells (in their mid-week ad) a $69 board AND processor with video. This weekend's "better" Sempron + Processor + Video (x200) is $119.

    The Deskstar 80 is nice, but 250 Deskstars have been as low as $49 after rebate, and there are currently 200 gig drives that are free after some rebate-price-matching -- See places like Fatwallet.com.

    1. Re:Sempron + MB w/ Video -- Drives Too... by lspd · · Score: 1

      If you're shopping with rebates as an option you can pick up a cheap laptop for around $500. Honestly, if you want an inexpensive computer with Windows installed you just can't beat the big vendors on price. The discounts they receive from buying in bulk are impossible to compete with.

    2. Re:Sempron + MB w/ Video -- Drives Too... by Penguinshit · · Score: 1


      I wouldn't hit you over the head with one of those shitty EMC motherboards Fry's pushes in their bait-and-switch ads.

    3. Re:Sempron + MB w/ Video -- Drives Too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean ECS?

      Nah, I prefer the excellence of a PCChips board. That's high class computin!

      Actually, last fall I bought one of their GQ brand $179 ECS based Sempron specials, same thing they are now advertising with a Geode proc. The Sempron ECS has been totally stable and trouble-free and performance is nice.

      There was no bait and switch. I asked for the special and got it, and then I chose to go get 512 memory. Neither the comp sales guy or the memory sales guy tried to switch me to something else or upsell me a warranty or anything.

      The whole process from walking in the store to walking out with the computer took less than 15 minutes. Cost including the memory upgrade and sales tax was $225.

      The onboard video was OK but I swapped in a spare 32mb GeForce2 card. Quake3 runs perfectly. MAME runs perfectly.

      Eventually replaced the puny PSU for a bigger one and replaced the CD drive with an NEC DVD burner. Including the "free" video card, those parts bring the whole box price to right at $300 and you don't have to replace the PSU or CD. It ran fine as-was. Ymmv.

  13. What's missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ars just throws out 1/2GB ram. But how do you tweak it? I wonder if they actually put a board together or just solved some equation.

    They also so "512MB is about the minimum to do any sort of multitasking without a serious performance hit."

    Well, that's just plain not true. (except maybe on windows loaded with spyware).

    No modem? On a budget box? No floppy?

  14. Cough by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2, Informative
    One click onto Dell's home web page, and I see:

    2.53Ghz Celeron, 533 FSB
    512MB RAM
    XP Home
    80 GB Drive
    CD-RW drive
    15" Flat Panel LCD

    The price? $399. Why, again, would I pay $525 for this "ultimate" budget box?

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    1. Re:Cough by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      If you see this post, You'll notice some differences:

      * Sempron is AMD, while Celeron is (eew) Intel.
      * Dell doesn't include an Onboard GeForce 6100, does it?
      * Dell sells you a CD-RW, not DVD+RW. DVD drives are a necessity today.
      * XP Home is practically a fraud. I'd go for XP Pro instead.

    2. Re:Cough by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1

      True, but if you want that shipped without Windows, they'll charge you an extra $150, so the price ends up about the same.
      :-/

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    3. Re:Cough by geekoid · · Score: 1

      because you don't know how to format a drive?

      serously, it's like looking at two pretty equal cars, and not choosing the one thats 25% cheaper because it comes with something you could throw away when you get home.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Cough by no_pets · · Score: 1

      XP Home is no fraud. I use it on my Windows machine and I'm sure Grandma or anyone else that only needs internet browsing, emailing, and an occasional CD or DVD burn would need nothing more than Home from M$.

      --
      "A government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned." - Shepard Book Quoting Malcolm Reynolds
    5. Re:Cough by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1
      If you see this post, You'll notice some differences

      The premise of the article is BUDGET BOX for surfing, reading e-mail and a few documents. The article doesn't even include a CD writer. This $399 box is already way overkill even for the premise. Sure, you can load more features in, but who's arguing that you can't? The point is that their $525 box (which doesn't even include the freaking OS) is way inferior to this $399 box.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    6. Re:Cough by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1
      The point is that their $525 box (which doesn't even include the freaking OS) is way inferior to this $399 box.

      I should have said "way inferior for the stated purpose, which is the lowest possible cost."

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    7. Re:Cough by ruiner5000 · · Score: 1

      because that is a piece of shit dell, and is using a celeron. pull your head out.

      --
      ignorance is bliss. googlefiberatx.com
    8. Re:Cough by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Grandma doesn't need anything more than Windows 2000. AND the discs aren't DRMed to oblivion, so you can move to a new box without begging Microsoft to reactivate your OS, as you must with XP.

      I'll never move to XP or Vista. I'm off the train with 2000, and it's sooo peaceful.

    9. Re:Cough by ClamIAm · · Score: 1
      The article doesn't even include a CD writer.

      FTA --> Optical drive: DVD-RW/CD-RW: NEC ND-3550A

      Also, there are quite a few things that make the article's machine better than the Dell. The Dell you're probably referring to has Intel integrated video, which is most likely a lot worse than the GeForce chip. This matters because crappy video equals laggy rendering of applications and data. A 15" LCD is either starved for screen real-estate or impossible to read.

      Dell is also notorious for pre-installing tons of crappy bundleware that cause lag and headaches, as well as not providing a "real" Windows CD (how do you think they get their prices so low?). If you buy a standard copy of Windows (or spend $0.10 for Linux burned onto a CD-R), you won't have to deal with the crappy stuff Dell wants to infest you with.

    10. Re:Cough by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1

      get a funnybone, bud.

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    11. Re:Cough by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      So does this mysterious $399 include $250 for shipping and handling? Hmmm

    12. Re:Cough by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1
      Dell is also notorious for pre-installing tons of crappy bundleware that cause lag and headaches, as well as not providing a "real" Windows CD (how do you think they get their prices so low?). If you buy a standard copy of Windows (or spend $0.10 for Linux burned onto a CD-R), you won't have to deal with the crappy stuff Dell wants to infest you with.

      Spoken like someone who doesn't know what they're talking about. I actually own two of these low-end boxes for the kids. I won't deny that there's some junk you have to delete (big frickin' deal), but yes, it comes with a full copy of Windows XP Home (as is listed in the system specs).

      15" LCD starved for real estate? What are you talking about? It's 1024x768, and perfectly readable. Keep in mind that a 15" LCD is the equivalent of a 16"-17" CRT. The integrated video isn't spectacular, but is just fine for surfing the web and other tasks. In fact, I often jump on my office computer using RDP from the kids computers and it's fine.

      I know this is Slashdot, but maybe you should get a clue. The lowest computer these days is WAY overpowered for almost everything short of video or heavy photo editing (though, I have to say that Photoshop runs pretty damn well on the kids computers).

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    13. Re:Cough by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      I still use windows2k.

      However I sense its death maybe here soon. Google products require Xp or vista and the new api's in Vista and XP with .net 2.0 will make alot of software only run on that platform.

      Linux is not that stable as it once was and buggy. I wonder if I could just upgrade to XP or just bite teh bullet with Vista? I may need windows anyway if I want to stay in IT. My skills are rapdily getting rusty.

    14. Re:Cough by corrosive_nf · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. I just bought a Inspiron 6000 laptop, and they didnt give me an OS cd, there is a "hidden" 4 gig partition that contains the restore image.

    15. Re:Cough by jmorris42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True you can get the approx $80 WinXP Home bundled into the Dell for about the same price. But there are some downsides also.

      1. P.O.S. onboard Intel video vs the Nvidia in the Ars machine.

      2. P.O.S. system. Dells are plastic crap, even the power supply is non-standard. This doesn't matter to some, but to those who have been burned. Quality parts cost more but you get what you pay for. Ars wasn't claiming to be putting together the cheapest P.O.S. they could, that is what Dell is for.

      3. Dell appears to be dumping their stock of 32bit CPUs. The machine Ars specced out was a futureproofed 64bit box.

      4. That Dell only has a CD/RW instead of a DVD+-RW. Granted you can upgrade to a DVD writer and still beat $525.

      5. The price for the Dell is a 'special offer' price instead of the normal $588. God I hate playing the rebate/special of the hour game, give me halfway repeatable pricing anyday.

      6. Some of us like the idea of NOT buying Windows and actually NOT buying Windows. If you 'not' buy Windows from Dell you usually pay more, which means Bill is getting his money and you don't get anything.

      I managed to beat Ars price just doing a quick & dirty test shopping run at newegg.com. I managed to get a flat panel in at $480 with subwoofer, a decent keyboard and an actual AMD approved power supply. I went embedded ATI instead of Nvidia, to each their own I guess.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    16. Re:Cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One click onto Dell's home web page, and I see:

      2.53Ghz Celeron, 533 FSB
      512MB RAM
      XP Home
      80 GB Drive
      CD-RW drive
      15" Flat Panel LCD

      The price? $399. Why, again, would I pay $525 for this "ultimate" budget box?


      Methinks that you are either mistaken or a shameless liar. That system will go for $499, not $399, at Dell. Prove I'm full of shit, though, by posting a link to back up your claim. Be sure the system includes the LCD monitor.

    17. Re:Cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Methinks that you are either mistaken or a shameless liar. That system will go for $499, not $399, at Dell. Prove I'm full of shit, though, by posting a link to back up your claim. Be sure the system includes the LCD monitor.

      Methinks I am full of shit, after all.

    18. Re:Cough by ClamIAm · · Score: 1
      I won't deny that there's some junk you have to delete

      Dealing with this "junk" negates any price savings to me.

      comes with a full copy of Windows XP Home (as is listed in the system specs).

      Oh really? So your Dells came with a standard Windows install CD, not a "restore" CD or a hidden partition?

      15" LCD starved for real estate? What are you talking about? It's 1024x768, and perfectly readable.

      Some people like to fit more than two paragraphs of text on the screen at a time.

      I know this is Slashdot, but maybe you should get a clue.

      Yes, the tenuous arguments you put forth most CERTAINLY makes you a superior being. How, oh sage, can I ever reach your level of wisdom? Oh wait, it's not wisdom, it's bullshit.

    19. Re:Cough by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1
      Dealing with this "junk" negates any price savings to me.

      I highly doubt that your time is so valuable that the under two minutes required "negates" the price savings.

      Oh really? So your Dells came with a standard Windows install CD, not a "restore" CD or a hidden partition?

      It came with a restore CD. So what? It's still a full copy of XP Home. Once again, you miss the point of this exercise. A minimal cost computer suitable for browsing, e-mail and light applications.

      Some people like to fit more than two paragraphs of text on the screen at a time.

      Sheesh, did you completely miss the premise of the article? No one is saying that more computer is useless. If it doesn't work for you, then spend more money. The budget box in the article also specs a 15" LCD.

      Yes, the tenuous arguments you put forth most CERTAINLY makes you a superior being. How, oh sage, can I ever reach your level of wisdom? Oh wait, it's not wisdom, it's bullshit.

      Considering I can understand the premise of the entire discussion, I think you might want to avoid throwing those rocks in your fragile glass house.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    20. Re:Cough by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      Considering I can understand the premise of the entire discussion,

      One must include his assumptions in order to make a valid argument. You have not included your assumptions. Therefore, your argument is pure horseshit.

    21. Re:Cough by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1
      One must include his assumptions in order to make a valid argument. You have not included your assumptions. Therefore, your argument is pure horseshit.

      If you can't be bothered to RTFA, you could at least RTF summary. An excerpt: "Look around inside most corporate offices, where most computers need to handle a few Office documents and light Internet use. They don't need to be able to burn CDs or handle 3D-intensive games, but they do need to be reliable and affordable. Lots of consumers out there probably want a similar box--an appliance that lets them get onto the Internet, take care of e-mail, and create a few documents. For them, being able to burn a CD-RW would probably be nice, but anything beyond that is an extra. Low-cost, reliability, and quality are key. That is what the Ultimate Budget Box is about: not skimping on components, but not loading it up with features either."

      If that isn't clear enough for you, well, you're beyond the help of even my enormous brainpower.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    22. Re:Cough by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      If that wasn't clear enough for YOU, then you are beyond help.

  15. What a load of CRAP by WickedClean · · Score: 1

    $525 for a budget box? I can scrap together some parts and build a friggin' GAMING PC for that much.

    --
    ...All I can say is that my life is pretty strange...
    1. Re:What a load of CRAP by Ravatar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Certainly, you'll rock at games like Tetris and Minesweeper!

    2. Re:What a load of CRAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, i think you meant case, but it would be just the box and no components

      but it would have neons and other useless shit inside it.

    3. Re:What a load of CRAP by rs79 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Gawd, no kidding. I'm typing this on a 19" panasonic monitor, 2 years old, at 1800 x whatever I got for $5 at goodwill. I bought a $4 really nice server with a P4-75 and put in modern guts I got for $100 at a used computer store, some $1 fans, some $2 video card with a fan on it and an ultra2-scsi3 raid array that set me back a whopping $70 off ebay.

      $300 gets you a new computer all decked out in these parts, but the cases are so cheap and thin and razor sharo (ouch) I'd rather mod old stuff, where old is a relative thing.

      $500. Make me laugh. I've bought running cosmetically near-perfect BMW's for that much.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    4. Re:What a load of CRAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. Hell if you want a budget comp you use all your old stuff (Old case, Mouse, Keyboard, and hell keep your NIC or modem). Anyone could build a comp that can play any game out there for $500 to $600 (Maybe it won't play it at high detail but you can still play the game). All it takes is looking around. For what this artical lists I'd rather just buy a damned dell than waste my time building it.

    5. Re:What a load of CRAP by NetFu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Honestly, the component prices listed in this article are very, very conservative, but actually RTFA and you get a good idea of what to go for when putting together a SOLID (not CHEAP/CRAP) PC.

      I put together a PC with similar components for my mom, and the final price (not including a monitor because it doesn't make sense to pay to ship a monitor) was $180. In the Silicon Valley I have access to a lot of surplus computer parts places, but anywhere else you could find prices just as good or better through websites or mail-order.

      This article is more of a guideline to building the ultimate budget box, not a frickin' blueprint or Bill Of Materials (for you manufacturing types out there). It basically points you in the right direction so you can avoid a lot of the research I had to go through to find the same components, but you do still have to use your BRAIN.

      Nothing in life is free, after all...

    6. Re:What a load of CRAP by hamoe · · Score: 1

      That's fine that you have extra parts lying around, but not everyone does, and it's even less likely you'd have numerous sets of extra parts if you were looking to get a few of these.

  16. dell... by atarione · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://configure.us.dell.com/dellstore/config.aspx ?c=us&cs=19&l=en&oc=DB110RF1&s=dhs

    celeron D 325 / intel extreme graphics 2 /512MB DDR / 80GB HD/ 15in flat panel /XP home

    however one huge and lame problem would be only 3x PCI slots (no agp or PCI express slot for video upgrades)

    but if you didn't need a gaming pc.. this thing is like $437.94 shipped (free shipping right now) when it comes to low end pc's ... I usually steer clients towards OEM boxes ... because It is impossible for me to make it worth my time to build a budget box for them.

    that said if the computer was for my personal use... i would build it rather than get the dell.

    --
    actually I am happy to see you, however that is in fact a banana in my pocket.
    1. Re:dell... by CsiDano · · Score: 1

      See I enjoy building budget boxes for people. No assmebly charge. I just built a sempron system for a friend for just under $500 included dvd/rw 512 of 400ddr, 80gig hd and a biostar mobo with builting gfx but included agp slot. I guess when it comes down to it anyone can have a budget box if they build it themselves or find someone who will put it together for free. I also install the OS they bring me, no questions asked.

      --
      piss off
    2. Re:dell... by Nimey · · Score: 1

      You'll get better performance with Ars's Sempron processor and GeForce 6100 graphics, though.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    3. Re:dell... by Magius_AR · · Score: 1
      You're fudging on numbers...the machine you just stated isn't even remotely comparable. The Ars box has a 17 inch monitor, speakers included, and a CDRW...if you tack those options onto the "$437.94 shipped" computer you priced, you're well over $500. And on top of that, the computer you priced is a Celeron, which isn't even remotely in the same range of an Opteron 2800+ . Celerons are bar none the shittiest processor ever invented. I swear my old Athlon 1700+ ran faster than my Celeron 2.4 Ghz. Or it sure as hell felt like it.

      But face it, it's roughly equivalent. The only difference is that building OEM lets you choose your components, rather than getting stuck with a shitty retail build full of "lowest bidder" parts and crappy bundled software (and often BIOS) loads.

  17. Retail boxen are still really cheap by comparison by harryk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    10 years ago, I would've said to build, rather than buy, a new box. Today ... I cannot with good faith say the same thing to anyone asking from an 'end-user' point of view. Generally speaking nearly every black box PC on the market is quite usuable and is well within 'appliance' price ranges. I noticed the other day at BestBuy that 'cleaning' a PC costs $250, whereas you could purchase the 'coupon computer of the week' for about $50 more.

    Simply put, for end users, just about any black box PC is going to be able to compete with a system like this, and probably come with more than you need for the same price. Just my 2 cents.

    harryk

    --
    think before you write, it'll save me moderator points.
  18. Diminishing returns for penny pinching by tengennewseditor · · Score: 1

    This is actually a pretty useful article illustrating the baseline quality parts for a working, lasting system. Don't fault the article just because a little bit more money you can get a lot more. There are diminishing returns to the amount of money you save once you get to budget territory, with bottom of the line processors and decent processors being only $20 apart.

    1. Re:Diminishing returns for penny pinching by RedDork · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more. Over the last ten years my family has owned a series of commercial low end computers from HP, Dell, and eMachines. Each one has crapped out after 3-4 years. The PC I built from scratch, in 1999, still running. Despite being moved ~6 times and hundreds of miles, numerous hard drive additions and removals, living for months at a time without a side panel, and residing for the past year in my parents' garage, unheated or cooled, it is still going strong, nearly seven years since it was built. I truly believe that the big companies put inferior components into their consumer PCs, knowing that consumers as a whole do not have institutional memories like the tech support and purchasing departments of large companies and governmental offices.

      Red

  19. Same specs for cheaper buying a "bundle" by chmilar · · Score: 2, Informative

    Most of the big vendors (HP, Dell) offer system "bundles" that offer similar specs for $100-200 cheaper.

    I recently purchased an HP CTO bundle through CompUSA. After rebates (yeah, I know, rebates suck) it was $300 + $89 (shipping/handling) + tax. The specs are very close to the Ars system (faster CPU, no DVD burner, 40G drive). It would have cost an extra $30-40 to upgrade the optical drive and hard drive, but the ones I got are all I needed for the "appliance" tasks I an using the machine for.

    Plus, I didn't have assemble anything (not like that's difficult, though).

    --
    Reading Slashdot is ruining my spelling and grammar.
    1. Re:Same specs for cheaper buying a "bundle" by Hackeron · · Score: 1

      Including screen?

    2. Re:Same specs for cheaper buying a "bundle" by chmilar · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      HP 15" 1024x768 LCD monitor. A pretty crappy one: no DVI input; just a single VGA.

      --
      Reading Slashdot is ruining my spelling and grammar.
  20. $525? Overpriced! by martinultima · · Score: 1

    Over the summer I finally got around to building my own brand-new machine – after dealing with 566MHz + 256MB RAM for several years I figured it was finally upgrade time. I went on TigerDirect.com and grabbed everything I needed:

    • 2.4GHz Celeron
    • 512MB PC3200 SDRAM
    • 80GB hard disk
    • 52x32x52x CD-RW drive
    • Integrated video (i845GE)
    • Integraded 5.1-channel audio
    • Integrated 10/100 Ethernet
    • NETGEAR WG311v2 wireless
    • Übercool blue case w/keyboard and mouse

    The entire thing came out at just $375. Obviously not the highest end system, but it's still pretty damn fast, and it can handle just about everything I need it to (including development of Ultima Linux).

    Couple months ago I also got my hands on a used DVD drive for $5 at a local computer junk shop – it was marked as a CD-ROM drive, so I figured the hell with it. So now my machine can also play movies and stuff.

    And considering that "typical work" for this machine consists of building a cloop or two, upgrading a few packages, running a couple different Web browsers to read /. or tweak my Web site, emulating some game console or other, playing a few rounds of SuperTux or Puzzle Pirates, testing the latest Ultima release in VMware or QEMU, and typing something in OpenOffice.org – and a lot of the time, all of those at once – I'd say that anything more's got to be overkill.

    --
    Creative misinterpretation is your friend.
  21. Linux = free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what price?

    1. Re:Linux = free by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      That depends on how you go about obtaining it. The article mentions that you can get it for free. Did you read it?

    2. Re:Linux = free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hours and hours of your time

    3. Re:Linux = free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read it this morning. Did you read it?

  22. Re:The real quetsion is... by CaymanIslandCarpedie · · Score: 1

    No, that doubles the cost.

    Sorry, couldn't help myself :-(

    --
    "reality has a well-known liberal bias" - Steven Colbert
  23. Defintely overpriced, I can do better by acoustix · · Score: 3, Informative

    Nevermind the fact that they don't include tax and shipping on those parts.

    I can get a Dell Dimension 3100 through Dell Small Business for $500 (+ $24 shipping) with the following:

    Processor: P4 Processor 521 w/HT Technology (2.8GHz,800FSB)
    OS: Genuine Windows® XP Home Edition
    Memory: 512MB DDR2 SDRAM at 400MHz -1 DIMM
    Dell Service & Support Plans: 90 Day On-site Economy Plan
    Keyboard: Dell USB Keyboard
    Mouse: Dell® 2-button USB mouse
    Hard Drive: 80GB Serial ATA Hard Drive (7200RPM)
    Single Drive: 16X CD/DVD burner (DVD+/-RW) w/double layer write capability
    Monitor: 17 inch E176FP Analog Flat Panel
    Video Card: Intel® Graphics Media Accelerator 900
    Sound: Integrated 2.0 Channel High Definition Audio
    Network Interface: Integrated 10/100 Ethernet

    -Nick

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    1. Re:Defintely overpriced, I can do better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Embedded DRM - FREE!

    2. Re:Defintely overpriced, I can do better by Ndkchk · · Score: 1
      I priced out something to beat their $500 gaming box a while ago, and while I might not be able to beat that Dell, let's see what happens.

      I'm working, as much as possible, with the same rules they did, except that I'm pricing everything after rebates.

      RAM: Corsair 1GB PC3200, $48.99 after rebate http://shop4.outpost.com/product/3746086

      Optical Drive: NEC 3550A, same as they did, $38.99 http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.asp?Subm it=ENE&N=50001326&Manufactory=1326

      Keyboard, Mouse and Speakers: About as generic as they come, cheap PS2 keyboard, USB mouse, and some sort of speakers, $12.99 including shipping http://www.chiefvalue.com/app/productdetails.asp?l inkid=119&item=23-174-003

      Monitor: 17" X2Gen LCD, $129.99 http://www.onsale.com/onsale/shop/detail~dpno~7181 70.asp

      Case/PSU: Generic silver case with a generic 450W PSU. $29.50, free shipping http://www.supergooddeal.com/ProductDetails.asp?Pr oductCode=BCC204-4HA-S-P4&Click=17583

      Hard Drive: There's either a 160 GB WD drive for $50 http://www.circuitcity.com/ccd/productDetail.do?oi d=67646&cm_keycode=85 or a 100 GB Maxtor for $40 http://www.compusa.com/products/product_info.asp?p roduct_code=320167&pfp=feb19sale.

      Now, here I left a choice, and a bit of a nasty one. I've got $189.54 left for a motherboard, CPU, and hopefully a video card. I'm going to offer it both ways, one with the best processor I can fit into this, the other with a cheaper processor and a real video card.

      Motherboard: Again, there aren't any great motherboard/CPU combo deals at the moment. For those wanting to go all-out on the CPU, I found an Athlon64 3400+ (socket 754, obviously) with a PCCHIPS 861-G (Yeah, crap, but it has onboard audio and video) motherboard for $184 (optioning to update the BIOS and including thermal paste). http://www.pc-infinity.com/mm5/merchant.mvc?Screen =PROD&Store_Code=P&Product_Code=MB7543400

      Now, if you do plan on doing a bit of gaming on this, a video card might be a good idea. Unfortunately, one really can't be put in without dropping the processor to a Sempron, so that's what I'll do. Let's face it though, with the video card that could still be afforded, CPU limiting will probably be a non-issue. As far as Semprons go, the 2800+ they chose seemed to be at a very nice price point, so I went with it and an ECS 761GX motherboard, $75 and $49.50 respectively at http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82 E16819104245 and http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82 E16813135002

      Now there's $65 left for a video card, but I'm going to offer four options; two each for ATI and NVidia, going to $525 as they did or keeping it under $500 (with the strong recommendation of spending the extra $25; performance increases a lot). For the cheaper two, we have a choice between the ATI X1300 128MB http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N8

    3. Re:Defintely overpriced, I can do better by Magius_AR · · Score: 1
      How is that better? It's roughly equivalent.

      Throw in the $15 speakers that you're short and you're in the exact same price range.

      The Sempron 2800+ also marginally outperforms the P4 521.

  24. Re:The real quetsion is... by Tinn-Can · · Score: 1

    no, cause after a few "upgrades" of osX versions it would cost double... can someone explain that? I want a mini when the new ones come out, but I dont want to have to drop $130 each time they want to add another decimal point to the end... at least Microsoft keeps OSs around for a while. Can't complain about Linux free rocks... go Mepis

  25. $500!?!?!? by nmaster64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They...suck...

    Seriously, $500 is RIDICULOUS for a PC of that calibur (unless your talking laptops). I can build a moderate gaming computer for that. A no-frills-just-types-prints-and-surfs PC should be possible at around $300.

    Why do you need 80GB for internet and word processing again? These people are idiots, and I feel sorry for people that really do just want the basics and go out and build this thing...waste of money...

    1. Re:$500!?!?!? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Seriously, $500 is RIDICULOUS for a PC of that calibur (unless your talking laptops). I can build a moderate gaming computer for that. A no-frills-just-types-prints-and-surfs PC should be possible at around $300.

      You can buy something like that from TigerDirect for about $300, if I remember correctly. Think the website is tigerdirect.com - but you need to look around - I always wait until they ship me a paper catalog, then I can look for good machines there.

      That takes zero time, really.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    2. Re:$500!?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are missing the point of the article. Sure, anybody can build a cheap computer that is crap, but the ARS team is giving recommendations on Quality parts. The focus is on providing a GOOD computer for fairly cheap. If you RTFA and RTF web site, you'll see that they are doing more than just finding the cheapest parts available.

    3. Re:$500!?!?!? by yeremein · · Score: 1

      Seriously, $500 is RIDICULOUS for a PC of that calibur (unless your talking laptops). I can build a moderate gaming computer for that. A no-frills-just-types-prints-and-surfs PC should be possible at around $300.

      Keep in mind that the quoted price includes a 17" LCD.

    4. Re:$500!?!?!? by Snorpus · · Score: 1
      Sure, no one needs an 80GB drive, but that's about the bottom of the market today, sizewise. You could go smaller, but you'd probably not save more than $10 or $20.

      For example, Newegg has a 40GM SATA150 Maxtor for $49, and an 80GB SATA150 Maxtor for $57.

    5. Re:$500!?!?!? by xthor · · Score: 1
      Keep in mind that the quoted price includes a 17" LCD.

      But NOT a licensed copy of Windows. Which, as has been pointed out elsewhere, doesn't matter if you like Linux or don't care about being legit...

      But I don't think this is that great of a deal -- Dell has offered low-end systems for this price with an LCD.

    6. Re:$500!?!?!? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Why do you need 80GB for internet and word processing again?

      Because it's becoming difficult to find anything smaller? However, I do have a 2gig bigfoot running on a Cyrix and 8meg of EDO RAM if you're interested...with Windows 3.1 on it. That ought to be enough for most people. And I betcha that most of today's viruses require win95 or "better"(could anybody verify that, please?), so you'll be very safe. Actually, the thing is a beautiful museum piece, and I won't give it up for a million bucks...Well, maybe for a million...That's still pretty decent money here.

      --
      What?
    7. Re:$500!?!?!? by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 1

      That 80GB is to hold all the viruses and spyware ;-)

      My HDD is only 74GB, BTW.

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
    8. Re:$500!?!?!? by corrosive_nf · · Score: 1

      Heh, ars forgot more in a week than you will ever know.

  26. dis be whycome it be news ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Associated Press - Yahoo news : Average American Family Income Declines.

  27. My laptop cost $500 and is great by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    DVD R/W, 11b/g wireless, 756M RAM (or thereabouts), fast AMD CPU, and OpenOffice is really expensive - and this is with (gasp) WinXP preinstalled.

    I would like to say, though, when I look around my office, I see people who need to burn CD and DVD, who need high-end graphics, who need dual core CPUs.

    Because I work in Medical Genetics. And my last office was in Structural Genomics (same kind of capabilities needed). Genetic data crunching really needs a lot of on-CPU crunching, but we usually can get away with only 4Gig of RAM (ok, 8Gig for Data servers). And all those run Linux (bought them from Pogo Linux).

    So, I'd have to up that ultimate office PC requirement just a tad.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:My laptop cost $500 and is great by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Just curious, but why do your office mates need to burn dvds or cds?

      Because it is medical data, and sometimes you have to maintain a physical chain of custody, due to HIPPA and other scientific medical restrictions.

      Sure, there's a network; Sure, there are secure websites; But sometimes you burn off a physical copy for someone travelling with a laptop, for example, when they visit - and are part of the study group.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  28. money money money by ruiner5000 · · Score: 1

    I'm sure you guys are making them plenty of money from Shopping.com right now. :) I bet they are happy.

    --
    ignorance is bliss. googlefiberatx.com
  29. You know, you look like an idiot by geekoid · · Score: 1

    when you use any excuse to toss Apple at people. the mini doesn't come with monitor, keyboard, mouse. If they wanted a 900 dollar computer, then maybe.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:You know, you look like an idiot by darc · · Score: 1

      The mini comes with an OS. A keyboard and mouse is like $20. Windows costs about the same as a normal CRT. So no, it's not the 900 dollar figure that you claim.

      --
      Tired of legitimate data sources? Try UNCYCLOPEDIA
  30. useless. by dakta · · Score: 1

    $500? Im estimating thats about £320 GBP. My 2.8ghz p4 with 512 ram and fx5200 came to £200, including monitor and everything (21" crt). Obviously not everything was new, but what is the point in a budget pc with top grade parts? These guys cant think, they're just contradicting themselves. Again.

    1. Re:useless. by prockcore · · Score: 1

      what is the point in a budget pc with top grade parts?

      Because the #1 requirement was "reliability".

    2. Re:useless. by dakta · · Score: 1

      so it's not budget anymore is it?

    3. Re:useless. by Magius_AR · · Score: 1
      but what is the point in a budget pc with top grade parts?

      There's a very good reason. Reliability.

      Some people may not care about super performance, but they still want a reliable machine.

      The more you skimp on cost, the more you throw into question stability and reliability. From anything from dirt-cheap power supplies to dirt-cheap memory to dirt-cheap motherboards, you'd be surprised what kind of weird inconsistencies, abnormal behavior, and glitching can be generated (which the average layman will just chalk blame up to Windows). Not to mention mean failure rate on some of the bargain basement components is below abyssmal.

      Maxtor hard drives have traditionally ALWAYS been priced below Western Digital, yet WD still maintains a strong following. Why? Because I've _never_ had a WD drive crap out on me. Maxtor on the other hand I've been plagued by failures on and I'll never buy them again to save $20. Similar issues with other components have arisen as well. You can save money and shop on a budget while still caring about quality. Those are the kind of people thats Ars targets. If you're just looking for a dirt cheap PC, go to Newegg and find every obscure brand out there. I guarantee you can beat this price. But I have no interest in investing in Seld-M-Break RAM chips.

    4. Re:useless. by dakta · · Score: 1

      I agree that you do have a valid point, however I myself am not in a position to buy the latest pc's so I myself own 2 of these "Seld-M-Break " pc's with cheap psu's etc. Now either a) Im an exceptional computer builder or b) take really good care of my system or c)my parts are rather good because the only failure ive had is a missing capslock key when i bought my keyboard. meh. Ive had them around for just over a year (got em at christmas) so theres still time for failur but its looking good. Another eyar ansd theyl be obsolete and time to replace anyway, but still valuable enough to sell on to people who dont need as much power.

  31. Gaming PC for about this much by yppiz · · Score: 2, Informative

    The grandparent post said they could build a gaming PC for this much (with some scrounging), while the parent post disputed this. I've been playing BF1942 and even Battlefield 2 on a PC I built from scratch 2 years ago for ~ $700. The only components I scrounged were the monitor, keyboard, and mouse. I'll bet I could build the same system today for $550.

    The low-end graphics cards at my local store, Central Computer, have 256MB of video RAM and very capable cores, and now cost well under $80. Here's an OEM Radeon 9250 for $70

    http://centralcomputer.com/itemdetail.asp?item=VGA JETR9250R

    Games need decent video cards, but do not need much else. I'm running an old AMD Athlon XP 2500 and it doesn't break a sweat on BF2. The closest I can find to this dinosaur, the Sempron 2600, is $72 retail from NewEgg.

    --Pat

    1. Re:Gaming PC for about this much by COMON$ · · Score: 1

      Seriously, I second your motion here. This price is a friggin joke, even with a warranty. You know what I want to see? a return to the dumb terminals. Give me a box with citrix and about 50 cable modem sized boxes for $75 each and a yearly renewable contract. That will be something. This box is overkill.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    2. Re:Gaming PC for about this much by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      I'm surfing at work on a Pentium II grey box with built in video and audio, with 128 megabytes of RAM, running Windows 98. I can do anything my home box can do, except burn CD's. It works. Current PCs are WAY, WAAAAAYYYY overpowered for office and internet applications. What an office box needs can be wedged into a form factor the size of a pack of cigarettes.

    3. Re:Gaming PC for about this much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The idea of gaming on a 9250 is a joke. It's not even a good joke. We're talking Xbox quality graphics on a 9250. The point of gaming on a PC is for excellent quality, and a $70 video card is not going to deliver on that.

    4. Re:Gaming PC for about this much by zerocool^ · · Score: 1


      If you're spending $70 on a video card, I'd rather have this 9600 PRO from newegg, which I consider to be a very reliable vendor. It's got 256MB of ram, DVI and VGA, and TV out, and can play most (semi-)modern games with no problem (I wouldn't try running FEAR on it and expecting high framerates).

      And you can get the non-PRO radeon 9600 from newegg for $57.

      ~W

      --
      sig?
    5. Re:Gaming PC for about this much by kesuki · · Score: 1

      I built a comperable system to the one in the article one not long ago, only i opted for the slightly superior Dual-channel memory supporting ATI R200 chipset. I went with a full gig of ram, as it was dual channel. I also reserched my processor more carefully, and opted for a newer e6 core AMD64 with 512k cache. Currently my system and CPU temps are 30c in a stadard beige case, without Any case fans hooked in, just a dual variable fan PSU, and the Cool N Quiet fan on the amd CPU both fans are running around 1600 RPM. yup, and the fan speeds can rev up in the summer etc, as needed, but it's whisper quiet, so quiet, i hear every HD access loud and clear.

      with a decent PCI-E card, this bad boy would be fully gamer ready, and because i reused a case, NEC DVD burner, psu (used a 20-24 pin adapter), and have a kvm the whole setup set me back less than $400, and i put in a 200 gig 16MB cache SATA drive instead of the pathetic 80 gig and have double the RAM.

    6. Re:Gaming PC for about this much by idonthack · · Score: 1
      I'm running an old AMD Athlon XP 2500...
      Quit making fun of me. It's not my fault I can't afford any new stuff.
      The closest I can find to this dinosaur...
      :'(
      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    7. Re:Gaming PC for about this much by aka1nas · · Score: 1

      That 9250 is only DirectX 8 compliant despite the model number. Step up to a 9600 or so and I will agree with you, however.

    8. Re:Gaming PC for about this much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I am still running Athlon 1700 or 1900, I forgot which (at 1.1 GHz clock speed, as that mofo freezes at 1.5GHz) I use 510 MB RAM (PC133), on-board video, sound, and 100B-T.

      And I can run anything I like on it with FreeBSD 5.4 (well, except OO, that is a bitch to run, I use koffice instead), whereas my newest dual p4 at work with Windows XP sucks ass!

    9. Re:Gaming PC for about this much by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, I'm glad you think that computers are for surfing and typing. However, there are other people that actually use their PCs for other things.

      Try ripping some CDs to MP3 or OGG on there. It'll take you at least twice as long to rip 20 CDs as someone with a better computer.

      Try doing some real research. It's not uncommon for me to have several Firefox sessions with 10+ tabs in each session. Not to mention having PuTTY up and listening to MP3s. On top of that, I'm running Word to type up my report. You could do the same; have fun watching your disk thrash as your pagefile fills up.

      My home PC records TV for me, outputs recorded video to the entertainment center, has 3 users (with fast user switching) running multiple programs, rips DVDs and MP3s, plays games, and much more.

      If you are happy running a lightweight desktop on an ageing PC, fine. But realise that other people value their time. Other people hate watching the desktop while Firefox loads. Other people watch videos and listen to music. For you to sit behind your old-school box and pretend that 90% of the people out there are just like you is dumb.

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    10. Re:Gaming PC for about this much by A+Life+in+Hell · · Score: 1

      Try ripping some CDs to MP3 or OGG on there. It'll take you at least twice as long to rip 20 CDs as someone with a better computer.

      Sure, that's something that mostly only geeks do - normal people either let itunes rip a cd when they buy it, or don't rip cds at all.

      Try doing some real research. It's not uncommon for me to have several Firefox sessions with 10+ tabs in each session. Not to mention having PuTTY up and listening to MP3s. On top of that, I'm running Word to type up my report. You could do the same; have fun watching your disk thrash as your pagefile fills up.

      "For me" is the key word there. It is terribly, terribly uncommon for my sister to have more than three windows open.

      My home PC records TV for me, outputs recorded video to the entertainment center, has 3 users (with fast user switching) running multiple programs, rips DVDs and MP3s, plays games, and much more.

      Absolutely no-one does this. Seriously. Most people don't even know that you _CAN_ do a lot of these things.

      If you are happy running a lightweight desktop on an ageing PC, fine. But realise that other people value their time. Other people hate watching the desktop while Firefox loads. Other people watch videos and listen to music. For you to sit behind your old-school box and pretend that 90% of the people out there are just like you is dumb.

      The fact of the matter is, 90% of people do nothing but surf the web and listen to mp3s they downloaded or copied from their friends. I believe that it is you who is mistaken about the "common case". Now, I have a reasonably powerful PC, that I use for compiling things, but my use case is terribly unusual. My point is, so is yours.

      --
      Commodore 64, Loading up the dance floor!
    11. Re:Gaming PC for about this much by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Well, the article was about a really basic, everyday office PC. No games, that sort of thing.

      I've no choice about what I use at work - no, correction: I refused a new PC because it had Windows XP on it. I simply would rather have a simple PII with Win98 on it to do my work (simple Office docs, terminal software, web surfing) than the monsters on everyone else's desk that are constantly crashing with viruses let in by the dimwits who keep playing arcade games on websites.

      I'm home now, and my own box is a tad more powerful. I do pretty much what you do with yours; I've no argument there.

      But if you just want to surf and do your work, the PII running at 400 MHz with 128 MB of RAM surprisingly still works just fine. I even run DLTV or Diggnation on VLC at work as I'm clacking away at a terminal to an AIX server running some software I do not wot of. I don't burn CD's because it has no burner.

      Try anything fancy, like running a PACS CD with lots of images, and it will lock up like a Wal-Mart after hours. So I try to avoid anything using a lot of ActiveX or heavy data transfer from the CD-ROM drive. I think a bit more RAM might help.

      I've been using PC's since 1984, back when we had little Apple II's in black steel boxen in the school labs. I've played with them all, except the XP-laden ones because I despise an OS that may take my computer hostage until Microsoft deigns to let me have it back again. I've found that on the Windows machines I've settled on the latest updated Win2000 OS. It works beautifully, doesn't give me any DRM lip, and can be copied infinitely as long as I care to keep using it.

      But for the most part, the hardware we use is insanely overpowered for office apps. Hell, it'd be easy to go back to the old mainframe model, with one superfast PC providing office apps for all the user terminals in the office. The latest and greatest PC's have more than enough capability to serve multiple users. We've been using laser cannon to shoot fleas for quite a long time now.

    12. Re:Gaming PC for about this much by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 1

      Shoot, once you have a monitor, the rest of an entire NICE computer is a grand or so. I built a very nice X2 4200+ system with 2GB RAM, a Raptor, 6600GT, all very good stuff for about $1100 tax paid and parts shipped. $700 isn't cheap at all.

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
    13. Re:Gaming PC for about this much by emseabrown · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm glad you think that computers are for surfing and typing. However, there are other people that actually use their PCs for other things.

      oh really? What precisely were you just using your computer for.

      Try ripping some CDs to MP3 or OGG on there. It'll take you at least twice as long to rip 20 CDs as someone with a better computer.

      What percentage of your time do you spend actually doing that?

      Try doing some real research. It's not uncommon for me to have several Firefox sessions with 10+ tabs in each session. Not to mention having PuTTY up and listening to MP3s. On top of that, I'm running Word to type up my report. You could do the same; have fun watching your disk thrash as your pagefile fills up.

      I counter your anecdotal evidence with my own!
      While I don't have 10+ tabs open in each session (I admit, it only takes 3-4 tabs of pr0n to do the job)
      I run my home machine under a pretty similar load, and experience none of this thrashing you speak of. In fact, I am suprised when my hard drive powers up (p3 500, 512m ram, debian)

      My home PC records TV for me, outputs recorded video to the entertainment center, has 3 users (with fast user switching) running multiple programs, rips DVDs and MP3s, plays games, and much more.

      OMG I must admit, my machine won't do this! I am missing some TV that I could be recording. You sir have made me incredibly upset. On the upside, your suprise at the ability to run a machine capable of "3 users (with fast user switching) running multiple programs, rips DVDs and MP3s, plays games, and much more." is in fact amazing! MULTIPLE USERS! WTF?!~ MUCH MORE

      If you are happy running a lightweight desktop on an ageing PC, fine. But realise that other people value their time. Other people hate watching the desktop while Firefox loads. Other people watch videos and listen to music. For you to sit behind your old-school box and pretend that 90% of the people out there are just like you is dumb.

      You sir, have made at least one correct statement. I quote, "For you to sit behind your old-school box and pretend that 90% of the people out there are just like you is dumb." The only reason that statement is even close to correct, is because of people that have a mentality similar to yours. I will attempt to sum that mindset up in the following statement

      OMG LOL!!!1!!!@2 YOU caint run FIREoeFOx & BURN MP14? YOU Sux0r KTHX, WIN XP OWNS JOO - i can run 3 programs, JAT THE SAME TIME MOFO!~

      fucking shit man, look around you

    14. Re:Gaming PC for about this much by autopr0n · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Try doing some real research. It's not uncommon for me to have several Firefox sessions with 10+ tabs in each session. Not to mention having PuTTY up and listening to MP3s. On top of that, I'm running Word to type up my report. You could do the same; have fun watching your disk thrash as your pagefile fills up.

      Hmm. I've got a 600Mhz Duron chip and I do stuff like that. Of course I've got 1.5 gigs of ram.

      Actually, the real reason I have so much ram is that I wrote a java program to post stuff to autopr0n.com that would need to hold 10-30 uncompressed JPGs in ram, which took a shitload of ram. Heh. Most people were still at 512mb at the time.

      By the way, I've noticed CPU speeds havn't seemed to be going up much lately, is the same true of ram? I remember when I started AP about 512 megs was average, and people are still using about that much memory. It's so strange too, since ram is so cheap.

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    15. Re:Gaming PC for about this much by autopr0n · · Score: 1

      I've no choice about what I use at work - no, correction: I refused a new PC because it had Windows XP on it. I simply would rather have a simple PII with Win98 on it to do my work (simple Office docs, terminal software, web surfing) than the monsters on everyone else's desk that are constantly crashing with viruses let in by the dimwits who keep playing arcade games on websites. The only dimwit here is you. You can't get a virus from playing a game on a website, unless you let install an active-X control or something. Either way it seems like no one at your work (including you) know how to use a computer.

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    16. Re:Gaming PC for about this much by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      You're being rather elitist, but you are missing the point. At work, the computer is only used for business purposes, hence the lack of need for super powers. I need a box that doesn't crash, doesn't get infected, doesn't bring on any surprises, because experimenting with computer science is not my job. Playing around with your computer is a cause for dismissal, actually. We're not even supposed to surf. And it's a very subtle trick I've pulled. Win98 isn't susceptible to the viri that are wrecking the XP machines on my network, so I continue unmolested by other people's ignorance. It's a minimalist approach: what do I need to do to do my job, and how do I not get clusterfucked monthly because every damned person on the floor is playing some malware javascipt game because they never think to pick up a ten buck Hoyle's gamepack at CompUSA? Yeah, I could run the standard scans daily (and I do anyway, even on a Win98 machine), but why not just use what works?

      At home, it's Mac OS X, various flavors of Linux, BSD, and yes, Win 2000, 'cause I really don't like the nasty DRM built into XP and Vista. I've been a programmer, been a database designer, been a few things besides; the latest and greatest tech is not welcome in most businesses. Doctors REALLY HATE new tech, 'cause it costs money and has a tendency to blow up at really inconvenient times. What business really wants is for things to work, each and every time, in the manner expected of it. Surprises are only fun for people who get paid lots of money to fix them.

    17. Re:Gaming PC for about this much by jgrahn · · Score: 1
      [...] If you are happy running a lightweight desktop on an ageing PC, fine. But realise that other people value their time. Other people hate watching the desktop while Firefox loads. Other people watch videos and listen to music. For you to sit behind your old-school box and pretend that 90% of the people out there are just like you is dumb.

      I think it's your world view that's warped. You mentioned some heavy tasks (OGG encoding, possibly video decoding) but as for the rest:

      • PuTTY? Holy shit, there is nothing more lightweight.
      • Listening to music? Works just fine on a PII at 200MHz, if the player or audio driver isn't extremely badly written.

      I use old memory-starved 166MHz and 200MHz boxes a lot, for pretty complex work (including image editing). I also use an Athlon 64 3000+ system for the same things. The only difference that really stands out is the ogg encoding speed ... and I do value my time.

    18. Re:Gaming PC for about this much by WebCrapper · · Score: 1

      Um... This always annoys me. People talk about Sepron's being old and not able to handle what they do.

      PII 700 with 392 memory running Win2k Adv Server...

      Currently, I have Word, Fireworks (with 2 decent sized projects in it open), Firefox (4 tabs), Winamp playing with 50 hours of music Q'd, a USB drive mounted and open, wireless keyboard/mouse, Apache and MySQL PHP/Python running, etc and its my houses domain server. Not a damn hiccup.

      Oh yea, AND I play Unreal Tournament and Empire Earth II, etc on it (THE HORROR!).

      Whats funny to me is people like you thinking that this box is trash. I haven't upgraded in years (although, I'm waiting on the last part of my new box) because I use what I can for the maximum amount of time. After I upgrade, this goes downstairs as a test box for programming as well as to help out my Render Farm - which I might add, consists mostly of "donated" boxes from people upgrading.

      My new box will have so much power, I won't know what to do with it all. You people make ME laugh.

    19. Re:Gaming PC for about this much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crap - forgot I have VMWare running an Ubuntu box too.

      "It's been 4 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment"
      BLAH!

    20. Re:Gaming PC for about this much by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      "Sure, that's something that mostly only geeks do - normal people either let itunes rip a cd when they buy it, or don't rip cds at all."

      Well, if you're right, then there is something very wrong here. I can't tell you what normal people do, but ripping a CD is just putting a CD on the driver and oppening the right program. Maybe they don't do that because they didn't have enought time to learn yet. But more probably, they do that.

      Anyway, the GP doesn't have a point here, because you almost never need to rip 20 CDs. Once you rip your collection, you just need some incremental steps.

    21. Re:Gaming PC for about this much by tombeard · · Score: 1

      I do pretty much the same thing, except with 4 machines and a KVM switch. One box rips, another burns, third downloads,leaving one to surf or compile or whatever. My Large (sorta) Array of Very Cheep (or crap) Machines. LAVCM, maybe it will catch on. Boxes are probably worth $200, maybe 3. You can run VNC and skip the KVM.

      --
      The reason we subjugate ourselves to law is to better procure justice. If law does not accomplish this purpose then it m
    22. Re:Gaming PC for about this much by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      Try doing some real research. It's not uncommon for me to have several Firefox sessions with 10+ tabs in each session. Not to mention having PuTTY up and listening to MP3s. On top of that, I'm running Word to type up my report. You could do the same; have fun watching your disk thrash as your pagefile fills up.

      Actually, PuTTY and most MP3 players don't use a whole ton of memory. Nor does Word. Firefox has been known to leak memory, but generally it's not too bad.

      512M is plenty to do what you're talking about. Your memory needs are a ctually quite low - compared to, for example, mine - I like to do all that while playing World of Warcraft (which has no problem stealing 600M of memory) and recording two channels of TV (albeit with hardware encoding). And, of course, there are plenty of tasks that make mine look small - even low-end servers are now often equipped with as much as 16GB of memory.

      Try ripping some CDs to MP3 or OGG on there. It'll take you at least twice as long to rip 20 CDs as someone with a better computer.

      Actually, for me, the speed of the drive has been a limiting factor for some time - CDs can only be spun so fast, and most CD drives never approach their claimed read speed. I have an Athlon 64 3000+, FYI.

      My home PC records TV for me, outputs recorded video to the entertainment center, has 3 users (with fast user switching) running multiple programs, rips DVDs and MP3s, plays games, and much more

      Shocker. My PC records over 150GB of TV per week, displays recorded TV on my TV, streams it to my notebook over a VPN, streams it to an XBOX 360, runs BitTorrent, rips DVDs and CDs, and is often running WoW, Maple, and plenty of other software.

      I didn't need a fancy dual-core CPU or high-end GPU to do this - the system has a GeForce 6200 AGP.

    23. Re:Gaming PC for about this much by ccp · · Score: 1
      "Sure, that's something that mostly only geeks do - normal people either let itunes rip a cd when they buy it, or don't rip cds at all."


      Well, if you're right,

      I'm afraid he is.

      then there is something very wrong here.

      Not really...

      I can't tell you what normal people do,

      That I can believe... ;>)

      but ripping a CD is just putting a CD on the driver and oppening the right program.

      Agreed, but still most people don't do it.

      Maybe they don't do that because they didn't have enought time to learn yet.

      No, they don't do it because most adult people don't give a damm about music (with some exceptions, myself included). You see,
      the obsession with music, musicians, massive song collections, etc. is really a teenager thing. It fades rather quickly after twenty.

      But more probably, they do that.

      No, they don't. For 90% of users, the PC is just for:

      1) Glorified typewriter.

      2) e-mail.

      3) Surfing the web.

      That's all. Really.
      It's not that they want to do something and don't know how. They haven't the slightest idea about what else could be done with their PC.

      The /. readers, even the most ignorant, has forgotten most about computers than the typical user will even learn.
      Think about all those support horror histories: they are typical.
      Because computers are utterly un-intuitive, and we are the exception, not they.

      Cheers,

  32. Re:The real quetsion is... by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

    In case of the mac mini yes... it is just at that pricepoint.

  33. How do you recommend XP Home with a straight face? by ivan256 · · Score: 0, Troll

    XP home has such crippled networking functionality that it is absoultely unsuitable for even the most basic tasks involving a windows network.

    For home use it's barely passable, but if you are going to use this machine in an office, or to work from home over a Windows VPN, save yourself the headache and don't even consider Home. Microsoft should be ashamed of themselves for even offering such crippleware.

  34. $50 for debian? by enrgeeman · · Score: 1

    I'd just really like to know how they came up with that price. That's way high.

    --
    sent from my slashdot browser.
  35. Sharky Extreme's Value Guide is Better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For about $1000 you can build one of SharkyExtreme's Value Gaming PCs.

    Not a bad rig for the price.

  36. Re:$525? Overpriced! by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    I agree, I bought my laptop at tigerdirect too, very good deals. Downloaded OpenOffice onto it, can run gaming software, pretty decent machines.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  37. Re:How do you recommend XP Home with a straight fa by mythosaz · · Score: 1
    XP home has such crippled networking functionality that it is absoultely unsuitable for even the most basic tasks involving a windows network.

    XP Home's networking is "crippled" in exactly one way - no domain support. It is absolutely suitable for all tasks involving all sorts of networking -- as long as that task isn't joining a Windows domain.
  38. Closer to $600 by darthservo · · Score: 0
    Good point, but it is more around the $600 (using those hardware specs) for Windows. If you pay over $100 for Windows ** Home, you're crazy. Microsoft has at least provided an OEM edition (full version) of their OS that does not come with a fancy box, manual, or tech support. The OEM version must be purchased with a non peripheral hardware component, but since your already buying the parts that's covered.

    Current price for an OEM version of Windows XP Home averages around $90, Pro averages around $130. So, the $700 spec is a bit high.

    --

    Prove it.

  39. Re:How do you recommend XP Home with a straight fa by ivan256 · · Score: 1

    as long as that task isn't joining a Windows domain

    So basically anything as long as you're only using it at home for personal stuff...

    What windows business network doesn't have a domain controller these days? What percentage of windows users build their own PCs, but don't work from home ever? Plus this article touts these boxes for the typical corporate office.

  40. Mac Mini by thallgren · · Score: 1

    That's what I bought. Did get 1GB RAM though. For that price you get the OS, and AppleWorks which will do for most people.

    Very silent, very reliable. Highly recommended.

  41. Re:How do you recommend XP Home with a straight fa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What windows business network doesn't have a domain controller these days

    You would be *VERY* surprised. I have seen 100+ computer workgroups. They can not understand why their network sucks...

  42. Re:How do you recommend XP Home with a straight fa by prockcore · · Score: 1


    What windows business network doesn't have a domain controller these days?


    Wouldn't that business network be supplying their own images of XP Pro? So why are you even talking about XP Home?

  43. Couple of comments about Dell cheepo systems by Danathar · · Score: 1

    There are several VERY important things to consider when buying a cheepo Dell.

    Yes it will essentially do email and web just as well as the ars box but....

    1) The dell probably has onboard video and NO AGP OR PCI-Express slot so you can upgrade the video

    and

    2) The CPU will not be upgradable.

    I bought a Dell for my mother and did'nt realize that the motherboard did'nt have an AGP slot on it (big bummer).

    The ars box can be upgraded with faster AMD socket 939 processors if needed and can upgrade the video card. So 4 years down the road you will be able to upgrade this system to run Vista (or OS X hopefully one day) fairly well.

    1. Re:Couple of comments about Dell cheepo systems by geekoid · · Score: 1

      thats ok. The postere mention an applience like computer. Do yuo worry about changing the motor on your blender when you buy one? Assuming you don't have a 1500 top of the line professional unit.Even if you do, I am pretty sure you get my point.

      Do you really think that in 4 years someone would just upgrade the CPU and not the mobo? Not that it matters, becasue in 4 years you can buy a new el'cheapo that does thae same thing for 300 bucks.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Couple of comments about Dell cheepo systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea, but what if you need more video power in 6 months for an application that needs more video horse power that the on board stuff?

      It is just common sense to have the option of upgrading your video on systems with build in video.

      Would be buy a car for a few dollars less where you can't replace the motor?

  44. If you click the link of linux issues... by Sark666 · · Score: 1

    You see this mentioned:

    Stability

    Unfortunately it appears that the supplied passive northbridge heatsink does not provide enough cooling for the integrated graphics processor, at least as it arrived from the factory. Any extended us of the 3D acceleration capabilities will result it a system crash. This is in a large server case with good airflow.

    Hmm, if you can't rely on this bare bones 3d then it might not be worth it. I wasn't thinking gaming but a modest rig that can handle xgl once nvidia releases linux drivers for this chipset. Cause afaik, you don't need powerful 3d for xgl. Hell, wouldn't quake 1 from ten years ago being doing more 3d stuff than xgl. Should be simple stuff for any card with good opengl (which unfortunately is few)

  45. Mini by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just buy a Mac Mini. Problem solved.

  46. People on a budget are going to need a modem by Marrow · · Score: 1

    Didnt read the article either, but grep'd for modem and didnt find it.

    I really dont understand why basic computers are still so expensive. For basic
    purposes, you really need very little.

    The time will come soon, when people will be able to plug a keyboard, mouse, and
    display into their CELLPHONE and have enough power to get what they need done
    with network-based apps.

    I suspect that we live in the golden age of general purpose computers. DRM, convenience,
    and price pressure will slowly make general purpose computers more expensive. Then
    they will just go away completely.

  47. Could have got a macmini by nurb432 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    That doesnt sound like that great of a deal when you can get a mini for 500 all day long, or just wait for a TV sale on a Dell..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  48. Doh. by t3kw3rx · · Score: 1

    I can build a cheaper comp. Go to Frys and pick up a $179 Sempron box (comes with 52x CD-ROM, 128MB RAM, 40GB HD, integrated graphics, and Linspire 5), upgrade the RAM in it (get a stick of 512 for about $40), and all I'd need was a monitor. Those are plenty cheap enough. Wal-Mart has a 15" LCD for $160. Sure, no burning capabilities, but hey, we're wanting to go cheap, right? So let's see. $179+$40+$160=$379. BAM. Complete system.

  49. Re:How do you recommend XP Home with a straight fa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd have to disagree with that. XP Home is crippled in at least two ways. Of course, XP Pro is crippled in one of those also.

    The other one I'm referring to is the OS's limitation on concurrent file transfer. From what I have been told by my local Windows guru, XP only lets you transfer ten files simultaneously.

    This can be frustrating when you have a windows "server" without Server 2k or 2k3 on it, and need to host hundreds of small batch files to a large number of computers.

    This is such a trivial job for a "server" that you shouldn't have to plunk down the extra dinero for it, but Microsoft has decided to cripple their non-server versions in a way that most people will never notice.

    Yes, yes, I'd love to make a linux server perform the same function, but that's not really an option in my current situation. Thanks for offering though.

  50. Re:How do you recommend XP Home with a straight fa by ivan256 · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't that business network be supplying their own images of XP Pro? So why are you even talking about XP Home?

    Did you read the article?

  51. Re:The real quetsion is... by c_forq · · Score: 1

    Well you don't have to upgrade, I know a ton of Mac owners running OS 10.2 and 10.3, nothing forces you to upgrade. And last I checked the upgrade was only $100, and you can jump from 10.2 to 10.4 for that $100 (less if you are a student, and also there is the family pack option).

    --
    Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
  52. Which monitor did you include? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which monitor did you include in that $500 budget?

  53. Office Box? by Khashishi · · Score: 1

    The cheap box sounds more useful as a home pc.
    I put my office computer through far greater processing punishment than my home computer.

  54. Pretty high by jridley · · Score: 1

    A friend at work bought a Dell laptop that seemed pretty capable just before christmas. It seemed nice, had a good looking screen, built-in wireless, a CDR+DVD-ROM combo drive, and XP home. He paid $499. It was about $575 with shipping and everything.

    If they can sell a laptop for that, I'm sure a modest desktop could be a lot cheaper.

    I built a pretty decent machine for a friend last year. I think the total was around $400 with a legal Windows. It had 256M RAM, a CD burner, and a 17" CRT monitor.

    1. Re:Pretty high by Yremogtnom · · Score: 1

      Apparently, you can get a $449 Dell laptop (Inspiron B120) with free shipping & handling till 3/1

      --
      You are alone in the world.
  55. Re:The real quetsion is... by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

    Points at the end are free. My iBook came with 10.4.2 it's now at 10.4.5 for *free*. These are nothing more or less than patches/new features. 10.4 came out last April. It looks like 10.5 will ship late this year or early next. So about 18 months till you need to buy a new copy to be at the latest and greatest. That seems like a pretty reasonable release schedule to me. In particular considering that OS X releases tend to bring some real value to the party. But then again I buy OpenBSD CDs every six months and don't really mind paying for my tools. So YMMV but I find it pretty reasonable.

    --

    Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
  56. Re:The real quetsion is... by kalidasa · · Score: 1

    Nope - you forgot to add the cost of a $178 TFT monitor (included in Ars' $525 price), keyboard, and mouse. Also, this ultimate budget PC has an 80 GB HD and a DVD-RW drive. A comparable Mac mini would be $727 for the box (with 80 GB HD upgrade, SuperDrive upgrade, and wired keyboard and mouse) plus $178 for the monitor, for a whopping $905. On the other hand, the quality of the Mac mini hardware would be superior, and the Mac mini would run OS X. Me, I'd buy the Mac mini for the extra $380. But I've been thinking about upgrading my windows box (a pathetic PII-300; gave my last Windows box away 3 years ago), and this $525 box looks tempting.

  57. Now I have RTFA, so... by enjerth · · Score: 1

    it's not a bad price if you consider they include the price of a 15" LCD monitor for that price tag. Of course I'd go with a 17" CRT instead, for their price of $461.

  58. Re:Retail boxen are still really cheap by comparis by fermion · · Score: 1
    It really is true. For a commodity PC, one really cannot easily beat the big system builders, if for no other reason than it costs more to retail 10 individual pieces, with the packaging, handling and liability, that a single monolithic system. Now, for specialty computers, or if one does not wish to pay the MS tax, the building a system might make sense. It is just like when I built my bicycle. It was more expensive to build one, but the standard configurations were just not to my liking.

    This case realy proves it. We go out and try to build a good cheap system, and it runs about $525 without shipping costs, and if this for a bussiness, the oportunity or wage costs involved in ordering the invidual parts and the building and debugging of the system. We see that dell, and I am no fan, for around $600, including windows. Now, if you are going to run not windows, or have a extra license to windows, or are going to pirate windows, then one certainly save some money. Otherwise, the build you own is likely to costs more, as a legal copy of XP home is $80.

    Which is to say the build your own is really for the hobbyist or specialist, not, in general, the type of people that this article is directed to.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  59. Part longevity? by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

    Skimping on price to ditch features you know you won't need (3d accelleration) or don't want your employees to have (loudspeakers) is a good idea, but what about part longevity? I looked up newegg real quick and it looks like one could build a computer for about a 100 less than what ars came to. Does Ars have some secret list of who makes parts that last longer than 3 months that caused them to pick parts I didn't?

    --
    I Browse at +4 Flamebait

    Open Source Sysadmin

  60. Crikey! Times have changed by serutan · · Score: 1

    I remember when memory cost $100 per meg. Now at $40/512Mb it's less than a dime. Maybe we don't have jetpacks and undersea cities, but hey.

    1. Re:Crikey! Times have changed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding. I remember getting an Amiga in college and maxing it out with 16 *megabytes* of RAM that added $600 to the cost.

      The RAM was really delicate too -- 16 1-Meg chips, each with ~16 fragile metal pins to align when seating it into the motherboard. A friend offered to install the RAM for me (I knew nothing about installing hardware), and I was terrified that he would shock the chips and all that money would go down the drain. He actually ended up breaking a pin off one of the chips trying to install it, and then soldered the pin back on... and it worked.

  61. Microcenter is selling by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

    Mac mini bundles for $499. So is Fry's Electronics. Mac Mini, 14 (for micro) or 17 (for Frys) LCD screens, Epson All-in-One printers, keyboard, mouse.

    You still have to buy a USB cord for the printer though.

    All around better for the neophyte computer user.

    --
    WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    1. Re:Microcenter is selling by blackomegax · · Score: 1

      once they run windows and have dual core yonah chips, maybe.

      OSX is anti-intuitive.

      oooooo, shiny GUI.......how do i run solitare?, oh, i cant.

  62. Build it and they will come by ShineyMcShine · · Score: 0

    I am building out a minimalist pc box with FC4 and customizations due to my SOHO client demand for roughly $399 installed. Future visits for add-ons and support are extra of course...

  63. Another useless article from Ass Technica.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do the Slashdot editors even bother posting anything from this two-bit site run by idiots? I guess Ars Technica is giving good money for a place on the Slashdot frontpage.

  64. LCD != budget by RomulusNR · · Score: 1

    Budget-minded consumers and offices are not blowing money on poor-price-point LCDs, except maybe in the front office to impress people.

    Someday LCD will be competitive with CRT. This is not today. The only major downsides of CRT are footprint and disposal, followed by power. The upside is that a given size CRT is $200 or more cheaper than the same size LCD. Add in LCD's nightmares offaulty backlights, pixels going bad, and fragility, and you've got a losing option.

    --
    Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
    1. Re:LCD != budget by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Actually, moving from CRT to LCD creates more space in a cube. That means you cude can be smaller.
      I believe LCD are cheaper to operate as well.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:LCD != budget by Detritus · · Score: 1

      CRTs give me headaches and irritate my eyes, LCDs don't. How much is that worth? I'll never buy another CRT.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    3. Re:LCD != budget by RomulusNR · · Score: 1

      Really, the dim lighting and trickling flicker in your peripheral vision and limited viewing angle doesn't bother you at all?

      --
      Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
    4. Re:LCD != budget by Detritus · · Score: 1

      No, never noticed it.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    5. Re:LCD != budget by RomulusNR · · Score: 1

      I dunno how small your cubes are, but I don't agree. CRT size is not the sole factor in determining cube size.

      After all the only space you are going to save in a cube going from CRT to LCD is depth; and cubes still need desk space for other items; phone; lighting, shelving, eating space, desk accessories, etc.

      In my L-shaped cube, the space behind the screen is mostly lost anyway. Upgrading to LCD will only leave more empty space there. Moving the LCD back to gain desk space isn't going to help any, because the space in front of the screen is still going to need the same considerations as a closer CRT -- basically, it needs to be unencumbered. Maybe you can do away with keyboard trays, if you had them in the first place, but that doesn't save you and cube space. Furthermore, placing the screen further away from the viewer is not going to help anything; either the viewer will have to sit with their stomach on the edge of the table or screen space will go down as resolutions do, to gain the visibility available at the closer distance.

      So sure, smaller footprint for LCD makes for less use of desk space. It sounds good to people who don't think about it.

      --
      Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
  65. WARNING by geekoid · · Score: 1

    I own one of the FRY's cheap boxes.

    I learned that the motherboard ahs a nasty habit of not suppling the correct voltages to the AGP slot.
    I didn't test it myself, I got a PCI card. I bought the thing almost 2 years ago for a development box. I had hoped to get 9 months ut of it. Now it is my wifes WoW box(hence the video upgrade).

    Also, you excluded Windows.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:WARNING by t3kw3rx · · Score: 1

      didnt forget it...i left it out. notice I said it comes with Lindows on it. :P

  66. Re:The real quetsion is... by Arandir · · Score: 1

    The people who are looking for a budget box just for email and surfing are NOT the kind of people who are going to be running Linux on it. Not even Mepis. Thus the Mac Mini is an excellent choice for them. Sure the upgrade to 10.5 will cost them, but so will the upgrade to Vista.

    --
    A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  67. Re:The real quetsion is... by Arandir · · Score: 1

    At MicroCenter three weeks ago they had the Mac Mini with extra Mac harddrive, flat planel display, keyboard and mouse, for only $499 (after rebate). You can't beat that deal with a stick! Hurry now to see if they still have them!

    --
    A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  68. RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RTFA. They include a CRT and LCD in the recommendation, and then let you pick the one that suits your needs.

  69. Dell again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    From dealsea.com

    Dimension 5150 + 19" LCD $599 - 5% = $569 + $24 s&h

    * Select Desktops >>5150 $599

    * P4 3.0GHz w/HT, 512MB, 80GB, DVD burner, XP Home

    * 19" E196FP LCD, 7.1 Audio

  70. Re:The real quetsion is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well given the history of Apple, each new OS you buy will actually run twice as fast as the previous one, on the same hardware.

    Really, I am not kidding here. My old 2000 iBook runs 10.4 hellafalot faster than 10.0!!! I am sticking with 10.3 for now, since it runs a bit faster than 10.4, but a lot faster than 10.0,1, and 2.
    I will check out 10.5 and see if that runs, when it comes out... Though I have a very bad feeling about those universal binaries; they gotta slow things down...

    So yeah, go with mini, and 6 years later it will still be a usable machine, probably much more so than today.

    Bad thing about Mini is the way Apple scams you on the addons:
      - You want extra 510 MB RAM? + $100
      - wireless keyboard? +$100 (plus you need bluetooth for +$79)
      - wireless networking/bluetooth? +$79
      - faster proc? +$100
      - how about our LCD? +$500
    By the time a newbie configures it, it's a whopping $1500+

  71. Stupid by cobryson · · Score: 1

    This "budget" box blows. I recently bought a Compaq (gasp) desktop that was an aging model at compUSA for a whopping $125 after rebates galore. Specs: Sempron 3300+, 256 MB DDR, 100GB 7200 RPM SATA HD, CD-RW, pci-E slot for video expansion, and XP Home pre-installed. While this is not an everyday deal, this computer or a similar system regular sells in the low 300$ range. It beats all of the specs ars provided, though it does not have a monitor. Last I checked, a 17" CRT went for maximum $100, and 1 17" LCD is $159 at Fry's this weekend. So I'm still way under their price, better specs, and I got an OS to boot. No this PC is nothing special by any means, but it will certainly knock out emailing and word processing as well as CD-burning. How on Earth is this crap newsworthy?? This PC would have been a mediocre deal a year ago...maybe.

  72. Re:The real quetsion is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks, but I guess I wasn't really clear - I'm upgrading my very old windows box at some point to replace the not-so-old windows box I gave away when I got my G5.

  73. Re:How do you recommend XP Home with a straight fa by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    iirc it also doesn't let you have any form of access control on shares.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  74. Re:Retail boxen are still really cheap by comparis by massysett · · Score: 1

    Yeah, an HP or Dell will be cheaper, but the parts they use are garbage, and the support is dirty rotten terrible. Drives, power supplies fail because they use cheap garbage ones.

    Now, the "average" user is scared to even open the PC. Many "average" users now even see fit to just trash the machine when it gets spyware! Jeez, just reinstall Windows...oh wait, maybe the machine didn't come with a Windows disk! That's another common Dell trick these days, to save...what? Fifty cents?

    However, these "average" users don't even KNOW you can build your own computer! Thus they would not be "asking from an 'end-user' point of view" because they don't know to ask if they should build a computer!

    Thus: if anyone's smart enough to ask, I would unflinchingly tell him/her to build a system from scratch. If they're not smart enough to ask that question, hopefully they're at least smart enough to buy a Mac.

  75. this is news? by jaxon6 · · Score: 1

    Uhh, so they went shopping at newegg, what's the big deal? I picked out the same rig, with same hard drive, dvdrw, mobo but a sempron 2600 ('twas four or five months ago) and even the same case. Friday nights tend to be slow news-wise, but how did this made the front page?

    Instead, how about a nice story about how a sequel is behing made to Serenity. No, wait, it's getting permanently axed. Oh, hold one one second, Joss Whedon says something different.
    I can help?
    How?
    ohmygododoomygodawesomeoooomygod Go Firefly!!!

    But seriously though, I think slashdot should only push real tech stuff onto the front page. How about only 'highbrow' material from now on?

    Stop catering to the kids in the basement and think about the career professional. You are nine years old, and for those of use who were the former when you started are now the latter.

    --
    Do you see the sig? Do you have it in your sights? Why yes, Miss Moneypenny...
    1. Re:this is news? by corrosive_nf · · Score: 1

      So news about a movie that no one watched, that was based on a tv show no one watched should take priority? WTF?

    2. Re:this is news? by jaxon6 · · Score: 1

      And yet another product of American primary education.
      Sarcasm is considered a form of classical rhetoric. My argument against the sensational abundance of Joss Whedon sci-fi topics that have been slashdot as of late is in the form of sarcasm. Sarcasm can be delivered in a humorous manner. Knowing that, then my comment can be correctly understood as a humorous jab at slashdot's editorial staff, in regards to a topic I have a strong opinion about.

      Serious jab:Slashdot, target your content to your base
      (plus)
      Humorous deflection:go firefly you are l33t!!!@!
      (equal)
      Strong message delivered in a less egregiously direct manner.

      So now do you understand that I was not actually discussing the semantics of Firefly and its production status?

      Why do I even bother?

      --
      Do you see the sig? Do you have it in your sights? Why yes, Miss Moneypenny...
    3. Re:this is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you are a fucking tard who is too self absorbed and into american bashing to make a coherent sentence you retarded goatse imitating faggot.

  76. Minimal? by videbimusne · · Score: 1

    Since when is a AMD Sempron 2800+ 'minimal'? My mom uses a compaq P90 for internet and word processing, and does Just Fine. You could probably pick up a system that was wonderful for web browsing and word processing - say a AMD k6 400 with a 4 gig hard drive and a cheapo vid card - for 40 bucks on ebay.

  77. ... the dump? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go rummage around the dump. I am sure you can find what you need there.

  78. Whats the problem with burning cds ?? by pklinken · · Score: 0

    I have a 1Ghz Athlon, and it can burn cds at full speed (my cd-recorder is a 52x philips).. i dont get why this whole cd-burning thing is used as a comparison ...

  79. Re:How do you recommend XP Home with a straight fa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For home use it's barely passable, but if you are going to use this machine in an office, or to work from home over a Windows VPN....

    You mean, like, if you're a professional?

  80. This is WAY too much $$$! by Newer+Guy · · Score: 1

    I bought an e machines Sempron 3300 machine just before Chrietmas that's as least as good as this one in every way - for $284.00 with a $50.00 dollar rebate (Final price $234.00 INCLUDING Mass sales tax!). I could have bought TWO of these e machines for what they want for one of these. Today, Dell has a high end desktop for $599.00 and that INCLUDES a 19 inch 8 ms LCD monitor. Also, HP has machines on sale all the time that run close to half the price of this one.

  81. Compare to a mac by lakeland · · Score: 1

    Yep, drop the monitor and add XP home... you'll end up paying more than a mac... http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/A ppleStore.woa/72802/wo/gE3NJN0RNT3g3jgMuIi1a9vd3vy /2.?p=0

    I guess Macintosh computers are cheaper than even the ultimate budget box now...

  82. block ads with firefox? by Kozz · · Score: 1

    when I told them I could block ads with Firefox their faces lit up

    If you can tell me how websites are getting around the pop-up blocker code build into FF (standard install), or how to prevent them without some kind of intense javascripting whitelist, that'd be fantastic.

    --
    I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
  83. Either put up or shut up - give details and advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm tired of people saying that they could build a super computer for a dime and not give specifics.

    I've been thinking about building a nice Linux box for software development and a file server. This box needs to last for at least 4 years, and be upgradeable in two( hardrive, video card, and CPU ). I'm not playing the latest games, so I don't need a gazillion FPS for Duke Nukem Forever. I do need to a large HD for digital photos. He is what I was thinking about building:

    Case: Aspire X-Dreamer II 420W - $66
    motherboard: MSI K8N Neo4-F socket 939 - $84
    cpu: AMD Athlon 64 3200+ heatsink & fan - $170
    memory: two Samsung 512MB PC 3200 - $75
    video card: eVGA Geforece 6800 256MB PCI-E - $134
    hard drive: Western Digital Caviar 250GB SATA 7200 - $98
    DVD-RW: Pioneer DVR-110D dual layer - $43
    sound: built in
    network: built in
    mouse: use one I have
    keyboard: use one I have
    monitor: use one I have
    Total:____________________________________________ __$670
    Is this a good price? Will it last 4 years or more (with upgrades)?
    rob_osx

  84. you have to be kidding me (probably redundant) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for $400 i got a computer that runs Farcry, HL2 and Doom 3 on medium settings.
    I was expecting to see a price tag of $250, which is what would be reasonable for an internet/word processor box.

  85. Re:How do you recommend XP Home with a straight fa by zerocool^ · · Score: 1


    Start, Run, type "SHRPUBW". At the opportune moment, select "Custom", and configure.

    That'll be $85/hr, please.

    I think you can also disable "simple file sharing" in XP home by booting into safe mode, logging in as administrator, opening my computer, tools, folder options..., View tab, scroll down, uncheck simple file sharing. That may not be right. SHRPUBW should work.

    ~Will

    --
    sig?
  86. Dude get a Dell by BuzzPoet · · Score: 1

    Dude, are you stoned? Dells are at $499 with way more than what you listed. The clone days are over.

  87. What? by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    I got my mom a university surplus box a couple months ago for $64 with that would have been about half as fast as this (900mhz + 512mb ram). Why the hell would you pay so much more for such a small boost?

    Computer stuff is so cheap these days, it's almost like garbage. The case and power supply were more valuable then the computer parts! (probably more then $64 separately)

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  88. '98 + 128mb of ram?! by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I'm sure your box can do anything, but how do you stand sitting around waiting for it to page for ages? Even back when windows 98 came out 128 megs of ram was pushing it.

    And ram is so cheap these days Are you still using EDO-DRAM? 512mb DDR-SDRAM is $30 on price watch.

    Actualy, your box is probably pretty close in spec to my home PC, still running the same 600mhz AMD Duron chip that I put in in 2000. I have 1.5 gig of ram though.

    (tried upgrading twice, once buying a 900mhz duron that I burned out trying to overclock, another time to a 2500+ Athlon, which was one speed grade higher then the motherboard could handle. I ended up buying another case and motherboard (the total cost for a whole new system was like $150 for what was reasonably high end at the time). But, um, something happened to that machine.

    Actualy, I used to run '98 on this machine, before I installed 2000. In theory I could still boot into it, but it's been years since I tried that, and obviously not all my drivers are up to date. Heh.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  89. Who cares? by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with having a "crap" computer? as long as you don't skimp on the hard drive, you should be fine.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  90. Is it a joke? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1
    $525, you call that, an ultimate budget box??? Ever heard of the "$200 Mac". That's something people at osx86project used to like to do a few months back.

    You try to put together a PC for $200 than can run Mac OS X, which means that it have a SSE2 CPU, which is already something that few people really need, people rather need something like a 500 MHz Celeron.

    http://osx86project.org/?option=com_cont ent&task=view&id=27&Itemid=2

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  91. Baseline: $0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dropped off some papers for recycling at the town dump. Right next to the "No Computers" sign was a PII in a tower case, a 17-inch CRT and a 15-inch CRT. At home it boots into WNT -- "Gold, Jerry, gold!!"

  92. Ubuntu is more user-friendly than Windows by this+great+guy · · Score: 1

    I bet Grandma would be even more disappointed if she switched from Linux to Windows. Sure she could probably run TurboTax, but do you realize that:

    • First she would be surprised to learn that Windows cost hundreds of bucks compared to most Linux distros which are free.
    • Then she would discover viruses, worms, adwares, etc. She would have to install and maintain anti-virus and anti-malware softwares. Is she qualified for that ? Does she have enough time to handle this ?
    • I could stop right here because for an hypothetical alternative OS user having never used Windows before, the 2 points above are sufficient to make him refuse the switch. Most Windows users are so used to their OS that they don't even realize that.
    • Then she would discover that her printer does not work anymore, since the drivers are not included by default in Windows (Ubuntu for example ships with printer drivers pre-installed). She would have to search them on the maker's website, download and follow the steps of a non-standard installer. And do the same for some other devices. Why does she have to download something manually while Ubuntu does it automatically ?
    • Then she would be annoyed by the fact that she cannot play a couple of videos, because most video codecs are not installed by default on Windows. Ubuntu ships with various media players pre-configured with most codecs (except MP3 for legal reasons). She would ask how can I play my videos ? Since of course she would not know what a codec is (Ubuntu hides the complexity of the subsystem).
    • Then she would ask "where is Adept (Ubuntu's package manager) ?". And you would have to explain her that Windows doesn't provide a single easy-to-use package manager. She has to search independently on the web for EVERY SINGLE APP she wants to use. While on the other hand Adept references more than 17,000 applications: it's easy to search for apps, install them, and remove them. Oh and in just 2 clicks Grandma is able to upgrade the whole system to have it up-to-date. But no, with Windows all this has to be done manually for every single app.
    • And the list goes on and on...

    You might find the above scenario highly improbably but I am pretty sure that's how my father and brother would react if I replaced their Kubuntu by Windows. You might also say that some things have to be done only once under Windows (driver/codec installs, etc), but I would reply that it's the same for Linux: configure it once and it works; with the exception that Linux will never (or extremely rarely) break while Windows will probably have to be reinstalled more often than Linux. It has been a bit more than 1 year that my father and brother have been using Kubuntu (KDE-based Ubuntu), since I removed the whole Windows thing :-) They are the main users of the computer, and they are very happy with this distro and consider it particularly easy to use. When my brother plugs his PSP in, a file browser window automatically pops-up and lets him access the files on the PSP memory card. Same thing when they plug in the digital camera. And when an audio CD is inserted in the drive, a window shows virtually encoded audio files which can be dragged-dropped directly on the desktop (audio encoding is done on-the-fly). They also have successfuly configured the printer themselves by running the Printer Manager application and by following the 3 or 4 easy steps of the Wizard. My father uses OpenOffice.org2 Writer as if it was MS Word. They don't complain about games because my brother plays only on his PS2 and my father is not a gamer. My brother also found an IM app (with Adept) that lets him chat with his friends on MSN, I believe the configuration setup must have been easy since he didn't even ask for my help :-) The only problem they have got so far is that they couldn't find an app able to uncompress password-protected RAR files (turns out a GUI frontend was complaining that 'unrar' was not installed).

    If yo

    1. Re:Ubuntu is more user-friendly than Windows by kuzb · · Score: 1

      my grandmother has never had a worm or virus. in fact, her machine is probably cleaner than any i've ever seen. why? she doesn't venture out in to the realm of things that she doesn't need to. she's intelligent enough not to click on attachments from people she doesn't know. she doesn't visit shady sites. she pays attention to the little icon in the tray that say updates are ready. she doesn't use internet explorer or outlook express. Her machine has been running problem free for nearly 2 years now, without any reinstallation - I usually inspect it once or twice a year to see how it's doing. It's really not too hard to maintain a windows system if you give the person using it a little education. If they decide not to listen to you, that's their problem.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  93. Not Mandrake! by ErixTr · · Score: 1

    but Mandriva.

    Ars should have known that.

    --
    less is more
  94. Expensive budget box... by Caeda · · Score: 1

    I think the most interesting thing I see is that this budget box with a 2800+ costs more than an identical system with 3200+ and Dual Layer dvd burner at walmart... they're only 498 in the box...

    --
    ~~ Please keep your arms, legs, and outright stupidity inside the ride at all times. Thank You ~~
  95. BS, Lowest usable Dell is more than you think. by amcdiarmid · · Score: 1

    The anand machine is significantly upgradable, the Dell is not, that makes all the difference. Additionally: No, $250 does not purchase a usable machine from Dell. Nor does $300 (the lowest price machine now) plus a $50 rebate that may show up. The lowest Dell, upgraded into usability is $399 - and will not be upgradable.

    Anandtech generally recommneds a machine that can be used for 3+ years with only a memory upgrade. This is not the Dell, which does not even have a Video Slot (Look at the Tech Specs for the B110. I had never heard of such a thing either.)

    Consider this personal opinion:
    "A minimum machine with WinXP is a Processor, 512MB memory (more if Norton or moderate use), HDD, and archival storage."

    Even just surfing requires an anti-virus product. This requires more memory than the minimum Dell. Add $$ ($$$ if Norton)

    If you are actually doing work, add $$ for a backup method. (CDRW? ok, your dell just went to $370 with an $80 rebate that may show up.)

    The basic Dell for $250 (after rebate) is a Celery 2.5GHz/256MB/80GB/CD machine. Any person doing ANYTHING with this machine needs more memory, and some way to back up data. Now we are talking about another $100 of parts +~ $70 labor. (Remember, most people don't do this themselves, it can be cheaper but then you have to factor in time to take it to somewhere...) More if you order parts from Dell.

    If you take the lowest end Dell, Remove the monitor, add memory to get to 512MB, and a DVD/CDRW - Your Dell is now $399. Without a graphics slot (????) Expect it to run for about a year and it's entirely non-upgradable in any meaningful manner. The Ananadtech machine is $550(?) but will run rings around the Dell, and can actualy be upgraded into something better. And that makes all the difference.

  96. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  97. This is not a good deal by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

    I just bought a DSM [Damn Small Machine from DSL-Linux it is cheaper faster quiter,and a lot cooler //http://www.damnsmalllinux.org/store/Mini_ITX_Sys tems/Damn_Small_Machine/>

    --
    Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
  98. $499 by patricksevenlee · · Score: 1

    Why build a budget box for $525.46 when you can buy a brand new Mac mini for $499?

    http://www.apple.com/macmini/

  99. Or a Mac Mini by nanoakron · · Score: 1

    Wow! Under US$550? Fully loaded?

    Just like a Mac Mini you mean...

  100. Sorry WinBoy, NO OPERATING SYSTEM IN BB. by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

    ...which would add $100-250 to the "budget box." Guess what DOES come with the MacMini, Mr. Smartypants?

    No, I don't own a single Mac, so no fanboyism here, just a big 'ol dose of obviousness...not that many people I know actually PAY for their Windows discs, but still.

  101. Re:The real quetsion is... by giantsfan89 · · Score: 1

    ... and I for one welcome our new Mac OS X x86 installing overlords

    --
    Don't ping my cheese with your bandwidth!
  102. Floppy/SATA... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    They went ahead and got a SATA hard drive, but chose not to include a floppy drive, and gave their reasons for doing so? The only thing i've used a floppy for in the past 2 years is installing SATA drivers. Yeah i have on in my box, but its a combo with an 11 in one card reader too.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  103. $500 for a Budget Box SUCKS! by SC00813D03S · · Score: 1

    If it is going to be that gimped, might as well pick up a cheap HP or Dell for under $300. Better to just spend an extra $200-300 for something that is not already on teh verge of obsolesecence as soon as you have put ti together.

  104. Are They Serious? Over $500 for this thing? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    Here's what Spectrum Computer in San Francisco is offering:

    AMD Value and Performance 64-bit Solutions $499

    AMD Athlon-64 3000+ 1.8GHz 512K 939
    Asus A8V-MX S939 mATX
    Mid-Tower ATX w/ 350WPS
    512MB DDR400 Memory
    160GB SATA 7200RPM HDD
    PowerColor Ati Radeon 9550 256MB agp
    Onboard Realtekk ALC653 6CH CODEC
    Onboard Realtek RTL8210CL 10/100 LAN
    16x DVDRW Dual Layer
    1.44MB Floppy Drive
    Logitech KB + MC

    Add any of the following LCD monitors:
    Aopen 17" LCD F2705-12S 12ms 450:1 Analog Black $220
    Nspire 17" LCD N17 12ms Analog Black $223
    Viewsonic 17" LCD VA702B 12ms Analog Black $239
    Viewsonic 17" LCD VA-712b 8ms Analog/Digital Black/Silver DVI $249
    Viewsonic 17" LCD VX-724 3ms Analog/Digital Black/Silver $304

    Now compare the specs to the "Ultimate Budget Box" - Ars is out their mind.

    ALWAYS buy your box from a bunch of Chinese guys operating out of a neighborhood store front. Nobody can beat them for prices because their overhead is basically zilch.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    1. Re:Are They Serious? Over $500 for this thing? by daemonenwind · · Score: 1

      The Ultimate Budget Box includes LCD monitor for over $500. So your "deal" is actually $200 more than what Ars is showing.

      RTFA.

  105. ./ quality? by pele_smk · · Score: 1

    I thought this was slashdot..."news for nerds" Since when was reading about building a budget box worth my time? Want to know what my budget box is? The garage sale down the street for a $15 monitor and the local university scrapping last years computers for $100 even. Thank you and good day.

  106. Who pays $500 for a PC these days? by Geminii · · Score: 1

    $500? Come on. My main workstation and the half-dozen or so backup PCs I use didn't cost that much. The last purchase I made was four firewall boxes with identical hardware for emergency swap-outs. They work perfectly, and I paid ~US75 for the lot. I run a stack of 21" monitors at 1600x1200, and they cost me around $US100 apiece a couple of years back. And yes, I've got CD burners and the usual gubbins.

    What's this $500 supposed to get you? Warranty above and beyond that on the parts? A big-box name sticker on the side of the PC? Free support? A voucher for Duke Nukem Forever?

  107. Re:How do you recommend XP Home with a straight fa by jchenx · · Score: 1

    I see the confusion. Here's a quote from the article:

    The Ultimate Budget Box tosses the gaming focus out the window, instead focusing on a bare-minimum budget system. To all those people clamoring for a minimalist Budget Box: this is it. Look around inside most corporate offices, where most computers need to handle a few Office documents and light Internet use. They don't need to be able to burn CDs or handle 3D-intensive games, but they do need to be reliable and affordable. Lots of consumers out there probably want a similar box--an appliance that lets them get onto the Internet, take care of e-mail, and create a few documents. For them, being able to burn a CD-RW would probably be nice, but anything beyond that is an extra. Low-cost, reliability, and quality are key.

    On one hand, if this is a box you're using at home, chances are you don't need a domain controller. XP Home is perfectly able to get you onto the Internet, check e-mail, run Office, etc.

    The part that's confusing is where it talks about the "corporate office". In that case, you absolutely need to have XP Pro. However, I think it's silly to talk about such computers. Who buys their own computer for the office? The focus of this article is for the home enthusiast that wants to build their own budget box for their own use. The writer could have been a bit more clear on this.

    --
    -- jchenx
  108. Re:$525? Overpriced! by Magius_AR · · Score: 1
    Did you even read the article?

    Monitor is _included_ in their price and not in yours. That's at least a $100 difference.

    Not to mention the speaker allowance they included of $15. Everyone here is fudging numbers to make themselves sound like deal masters when in fact they're just skimping or excluding certain features whereas Ars did not.

    Maybe Ars recognized Celeron as the steamy pile that it is and decided to go with a semi-decent processor instead for an extra 10 or 20 bucks.