Slashdot Mirror


Man Builds 60-foot Tower to Get Highspeed Access

Matt Russell writes "A church was blocking the only high speed signal in town, so he decided he needed to go higher. This is the story of one man's quest to build a 60-foot reception tower in his yard and retire his modem once and for all." From the article: "Well, if you want to have a tower, you need to find one. Buying a new tower is not a good idea, since there are plenty of used ones. In my case, I was in need of a tower that was at least 50', which would cost around $1,000 USD for a new one. The way I searched was pretty simple. I spread the word around town that I was looking for one, and I drove around to see if there was a house with an old TV tower or something like that. If a 30' tower would be enough for you, go to a small town and look for TV tower. If you find one that looks to be in good shape, just go knock on the door and ask if you can buy it. At least 90% of people don't use them anymore, so it's a good place to start! "

348 comments

  1. oh by coaxeus · · Score: 4, Funny

    er, what? Wouldn't GPRS or something be a little more bang for buck ? (no, I didn't RTFA)

    --
    My name is coaxeus, and I approve this message. In fact, I think it is awesome.
    1. Re:oh by coaxeus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      okay read it a bit.. "and not when everyone around me, just far enough away from the church, would have it." .. "I would build a sixty-plus foot tower so I could intercept the signal! " Why not buy one or two $30 wireless routers and a directional antenna and share with a neighbor that isn't behind a church then. Honestly.

      --
      My name is coaxeus, and I approve this message. In fact, I think it is awesome.
    2. Re:oh by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why not buy one or two $30 wireless routers and a directional antenna and share with a neighbor that isn't behind a church then.
      Honestly


      Spoken like a woman who doesn't understand that the measure of a man's true worth is the size of his tower.

    3. Re:oh by jzeejunk · · Score: 2, Funny

      but then you don't make it to the coverpage of slashdot :p

      --
      sarchasm
    4. Re:oh by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      It's not that hard to find friends (usually, a friend's workmate's friend, etc, etc) who can agree to have an antenna on their roof. Usually, just giving them a sliver of bandwidth or even just a rebate in purchasing that sliver off you will make them agree.

      And then you'll find yourself to be the main ISP in your town :p

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    5. Re:oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What some people won't do for porn....

    6. Re:oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      behind a church?

      Some churches have been making money by locating a cell tower in their steeple. One less tower out in the open. Money for the church.

      One of the things to look out for (instead) is the actual height in accordance with local laws & zoning. Aside from those who are grandfathered, no structures (including towers) can be more than four stories high (where I live). Otherwise, you have to go to the BZA. There are several hotels & corporate offices which could easily be taller but have been limited to four stories in order to comply.

      If he's doing that to get his own connection, why not become a small ISP for his neighbors and he'd be in a position to sue spammers? That would be money not worth looking the other way from. Particularly because all of the information to track down these chickenboners is online & easy to find.



    7. Re:oh by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 2, Funny

      Haven't you heard? If you try to get around what God has built, you'll only fail. Human fallability cannot match God's perfection.

      You can't get around the law of God. No, you'll have to go over instead. Hence, the tower (of Babel). His signals will be scrambled.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    8. Re:oh by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Even with fancy antennas, commercial or user made, using consumer grade routers to repeat a network signal is trying at best. It will work. For a while. Then you might have to reset the routers. Or replace them because most of them aren't really well built.

    9. Re:oh by coaxeus · · Score: 1

      really ? that's odd, I set up point to point wireless links for work all the time that work indefintely. Pro gear like cisco/moto/canon/etc helps but you can get a perfectly reliable with a cheap-o router and decent antenna, that reaches miles.

      --
      My name is coaxeus, and I approve this message. In fact, I think it is awesome.
    10. Re:oh by jred · · Score: 1

      Not a Linksys or Dlink, though I think Dlink is a little better. I've seen roughly 80%* failure rate in the first year, and most of them have to be rebooted regularly. Anectdotally, it seems like the ones that never need rebooting are the ones that suddenly fail.

      You get what you pay for, and 95%* of the people are cheap-ass bastards.

      *all numbers pulled right outta my butt.

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    11. Re:oh by WebCrapper · · Score: 1

      Hm...

      I have 2 Linksys routers in my house (50 year old gov housing with 2 foot thick, reinforced, walls) and another Linksys router in my basement connected with a 9db antenna and its all running Sveasoft. I've had this setup for over a year and not one hiccup - unless you count Win2K AdvSvr crashing occasionally.

      Before I had my DSL installed, I had the 9db antenna pointed to some idiot with an open access point about 100 meters away.

      My biggest point of failure is my ISP's DNS server, and I'm thinking about hooking up my own DNS server to get around them.

    12. Re:oh by acariquara · · Score: 1

      You know, in hacked/custom Linksys firmwares there is this thing called "WDS Watchdog" or "AP Watchdog". It automagically reboots your router in case the radio starts acting weird. Or, if you are some sort of neat freak, there's a cron job for rebooting the router every n minutes (this is actually useful if you got the five-day connection bug and does not know how to get around it)

      You say crappy routers, I say get the configuration right. Well tuned a WRT can beat the heck out of many "commercial" grade routers. Oh, and no exploits for you either.

      --
      Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
    13. Re:oh by Random+Destruction · · Score: 1

      Would it happen to be bell dsl? Mine is and their dns sucks some serious ass

      I use dnsmasq running on a linux server and some public dns servers

      works like a charm

      --
      :x
    14. Re:oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a profane mutha fucka.

    15. Re:oh by typical · · Score: 1

      Maybe he's a hardware guy and not a software guy. :-)

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    16. Re:oh by WebCrapper · · Score: 1

      I'm stuck in Germany for the next year or so due to the USArmy, so no... Unfortunately, they blame their upstream provider most of the time.

    17. Re:oh by Random+Destruction · · Score: 1

      Yeah, around here poor dns seems pretty common. Even common sites like google would sometimes time out during dns resolution. Caching and using those name servers made a hige difference, though.

      --
      :x
  2. Why not build it yourself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    In Scouts we used to lash wood together to build structures. A forty foot tower is not hard to build this way.

    1. Re:Why not build it yourself? by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 1

      Really?! In Scouts all we ever did was build those little wooden cars ... actually the fathers built them.

    2. Re:Why not build it yourself? by aschlemm · · Score: 1

      How many years could one expect lashed together wood to survive the elements? For this DIY project you want something solid that's going to last for many years exposed to the elements (rain,snow,ice,wind,and sun) and not fall down and destory property, or kill somebody,

    3. Re:Why not build it yourself? by MMaestro · · Score: 2, Funny

      At sixty feet you start worrying about wind knocking things down, wood rotting and the simple fact that its a fire hazard. Also, wood is fine for short term use, but considering this guy is thinking about keeping the tower up for years, wood isn't going to cut it.

    4. Re:Why not build it yourself? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Ah, but would it meet code?

    5. Re:Why not build it yourself? by Isotopian · · Score: 1

      Why is this so funny?

      --

      It's poetry with a beat behind it! And guns! They're like beatniks with automatic weapons.

    6. Re:Why not build it yourself? by Heembo · · Score: 1

      Well, you are fine if you use mohagony, epe, or some great hardwood, but then the price would be more than a metal tower..... ;-)

      --
      Horns are really just a broken halo.
    7. Re:Why not build it yourself? by MMaestro · · Score: 1

      That what I want to know. I honestly have no clue.

    8. Re:Why not build it yourself? by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Lashing wood together. Erecting poles. 40 foot towers. Not hard to build. Boy scouts are so much fun with their giant wood tower erections.

      At least, that's my guess as to what was so funny about it.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    9. Re:Why not build it yourself? by superflyguy · · Score: 2, Funny

      That would be the difference between cub scouts and boy scouts... cub scouts do nothing but are too stupid to know they aren't doing anything. Those of us who make it to boy scouts quickly learn that we're doing a lot of stuff we'd rather not bother with.

    10. Re:Why not build it yourself? by rspress · · Score: 5, Informative

      This guys tower is going to come down the first time it is iced over and the wind blows strong. The weak point of the tower is the welded base plate. The place where the tower meets the ground will have the strongest amount of stress on it. It will be stress pushing in one direction. If he uses guy wires it will be even worse. It will be a twisting motion at the base. As far as I can tell, the site was not slashdot ready, he never used rebar to make a cage for the base. If he never took the tower completely apart there could be other weak points he does not even know about. His story should be a primer of how not to erect a tower.

      I had a 48 foot rohn tower I used for Amateur radio use and it was a tad overloaded. My hole was more of a polygon than a square and besides a very strong rebar cage for the base and the tower legs which were sunk 3 feet into the concrete, I used a little over two yards of concrete. This may sound like overkill but with the tower load I wanted it strong. Good thing. We had some of the strongest pacific storms after that tower went up. It took winds in excess of 100MPH. That wind uprooted orchards in our area and knocked over a few towers. Mine was hardly moving.

    11. Re:Why not build it yourself? by me+at+werk · · Score: 1

      wood isn't going to cut it.

      if a woodchuck could get this joke

      then again theres a guy named Chuck Wood and i really wonder how bad he was tormented

      --
      For context, click Parent.
    12. Re:Why not build it yourself? by 70Bang · · Score: 1



      Why?

      Could it be because they'd always walk around asking, "What's up, Chuck?" ;)


    13. Re:Why not build it yourself? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2, Informative

      My father built a tower for a fellow amateur radio enthusiast about 20 years ago. The pivot for the tower was welded onto a thick steel tube (originally for a petrol station sign - way overkill, the wall thickness was around 10mm) with a big steel plate welded to the bottom. The foundation was cast with ragbolts to bolt the tower to, then more concrete was poured in on top putting the mounting plate in the middle of a couple of cubic metres of concrete.

      It's survived 20 years of Scottish winters quite happily. Even some of the original antennas are still flying, despite regular 140mph winds.

    14. Re:Why not build it yourself? by walt-sjc · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ha. Just wait until you get into Man Scouts. In Man Scouts you get to travel to foreign countries, drive 10 ton vehicles, fly airplains, helecoptors, sail in ships the size of small towns, and play with massive amounts of firepower! Only downside is that you have to put up with sandstorms, and getting shot at.

    15. Re:Why not build it yourself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The weak point of the tower is the welded base plate.

      Yup. And we don't know how well that portion was done. Or not.

      >he never used rebar to make a cage for the base.

      Sure he did: the base was some round concrete sewer pipe, filled with concreate. The walls of that round pipe are full of rebar.

    16. Re:Why not build it yourself? by rspress · · Score: 2, Informative

      It sounds like your father did more than this person did. The wind load on the type of tower this person has is quite a lot. The connection to the base is but one thing wrong with it. He used no rebar in the base. He has several different concrete pours instead of just one with no rebar connecting the layers. He has a high water table and he put no gravel in the base for drainage when the table drops.

      I am a ham radio person myself. I know a lot of people in the radio business who do towers for a living. They would cringe in fear on that tower. True, the tower may never come down but I would sure hate it to be aimed at my house in a high wind. I have seen towers that were brought down with winds of only 90MPH and no ice load and erected better than his.

      I hope you are right......if not I hope he is insured.

    17. Re:Why not build it yourself? by lahuard · · Score: 1

      I bet daddy helped him on his science projects a lot as well.

    18. Re:Why not build it yourself? by jimdouglass · · Score: 1

      4x4x4 with rebar cage Rohn HBX-56 with Force12 C3S with 40 meter add-on and internet parabolic.... 100+ mph winds in flat lands of Kansas --- doing fine. Jim AC0E

      --
      James Douglass Garden City, Kansas Be kinder than necessary, for everyone you meet is fighting some kind of battle
    19. Re:Why not build it yourself? by rspress · · Score: 1

      That is what I am say. You had a rebar cage, as did mine. You probably poured all your concrete in one pour like I did. I was lucky the cement truck pulled right up to the hole. Your tower legs were buried as well just like my rohn tower was. You probably graveled the bottom of the hole like I did.

      The bolts on his tower legs will probably stay but I worry about the welds and the bolts on the base plate. That and the concrete with several pours over a couple of days and no rebar. I am no so sure the tower this guy put up will hold in those winds with an ice load.

    20. Re:Why not build it yourself? by buck-yar · · Score: 1

      This guy is right, the base is the weakest part. The farm I grew up on was on somewhat of a plateau and had a cell tower at its highest point. One day a microburst [rapidly falling air] took down the tower and it snapped one of the the threaded rods the bolted into.

      Normally, a tower doesn't have much stress. Throw some decent wind at it, and this guys tower will more than likely topple, unless he poured a proper foundation.

    21. Re:Why not build it yourself? by rspress · · Score: 1

      Thank you!

      Actually a tower does have stored energy in it. What really worries me is that foundation. Since he used no rebar and the concrete was poured in layers over a long period of time the tower base may only really be anchored in a few inches of concrete. He also had a perfectly round base. When you dig a hole it is usually far from perfect and that helps anchor the tower. Mine was in very dry soil most of the year and I hit hard pan about a foot and half down.

      The guy my luck out and it may never come down. As I said before I would sure hate to have it point my direction!

    22. Re:Why not build it yourself? by me+at+werk · · Score: 1

      How much wood could a wood chuck chuck if a wood chuck could, Chuck Wood?

      --
      For context, click Parent.
  3. News at 11 by Slash+Veteran · · Score: 5, Funny

    Man installs TV aerial

    plans to install new mailbox and gutters next weekend

    details at 11

    1. Re:News at 11 by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Funny

      No! The Honeydew List is supposed to be write-only memory! You're not supposed to actually do any of the things written on it!

    2. Re:News at 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! What's the big deal? I have an 80ft tower out back supporting quite a few amateur radio antennas. Heck, most of my ham friends have towers as well.

      What's so special about someone using a tower for wifi? If I wanted to, I could mount an access point on my tower.

      Since when is a guy putting up a tower news? Also... His install is most definitely not upto spec. I hope the local building inspectors don't drop in on him. ;) lol

      I actually had to have them come out and look at everything here so I could get their "stamp of approval".

    3. Re:News at 11 by sirwallyc · · Score: 0

      I'm reminded of a local aerial installation business in the town where I went to boarding school. I saw their van drive by one day, and I'll never forget their slogan:

      "Andy's Aerials -- Satisfaction with every erection"

  4. Ahem by anonicon · · Score: 1, Funny

    I for one welcome our new pickup truck, towerbearing oooooooooooverlords. :-)
    Chuck

    1. Re:Ahem by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      Ahhh, but if you have a pickup truck, you don't need a tower. Just get two 10' poles from Radio Shack. Stick 'em together to make a 20' pole. Get their guy wire mounting kit. Get four tie-down straps, and the mount points for the stake holes in the pickup. Attach the tie-downs to the guy mounting ring. Attach your antenna to the top of the pole. Hoist the pole up, and attach the tie-downs to the mount points. Voila'! A tower in a bed. Hey, it gets you 23' up in the air, which isn't bad for temporary.
      -russ
      p.s. you may need help hoisting the pole. 20' is damn long.

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    2. Re:Ahem by technos · · Score: 1

      Hey, it gets you 23' up in the air,

      Lift kits; They're not just for ground clearance anymore!

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
  5. heh by bicycleguy · · Score: 1

    I'll be damnd if I sell my tower. How could I get my pirate station out otherwise?

    --
    Those who wish to control their own lives and move beyond the existence as mere clients and consumers- those people ride
    1. Re:heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll need to sell the tower to pay the fines when the FCC catches up with you.
      (Fines start at around $10K, BTW).

    2. Re:heh by petecarlson · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the Bush administration will take a different stand, but I don't think the FCC carries too much weight in Canada.

  6. how about bartering for access to the tower by skidv · · Score: 5, Informative

    I didn't see the protocol (was it wifi?) in the article, but why not ask the church to put a repeater in their tower in exchange for setting up their computer to access the same ISP?

    Another case of over engineering the solution to the problem.

    1. Re:how about bartering for access to the tower by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 4, Informative
      I didn't see the protocol (was it wifi?) in the article, but why not ask the church to put a repeater in their tower in exchange for setting up their computer to access the same ISP?

      Since this is a digg repeat, I'll tell you what he said. ;) Evidently, he asked them if they could work something out and they said no.

      It is overengineering a bit, but not so much if you actually do have access to the crap he has and the ability to do it.

    2. Re:how about bartering for access to the tower by skidv · · Score: 1

      I regret my previous comment.

      Now he can share the ISP with those even further away. Next ... how to build a repeater. Or convert to wi-fi and use an established wi-fi repeater and antenna.

    3. Re:how about bartering for access to the tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They said I couldn't use their connection to surf for porn.

    4. Re:how about bartering for access to the tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      That was wonderfully Christian of them, as well as helping their community.

    5. Re:how about bartering for access to the tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said it was a Christian church?

    6. Re:how about bartering for access to the tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Since this is a digg repeat

      oh shut up you stupid fucking idiot. digg and slashdot are not even remotely similar. slashdot cannot "repeat" from digg, and digg cannot "repeat" from slashdot. digg is dumb shit for glassy-eyed web2.0 blogger fucking complete fucking loser types. slashdot is for nerds.

    7. Re:how about bartering for access to the tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ePenis.

    8. Re:how about bartering for access to the tower by Meagermanx · · Score: 2, Funny

      They were getting in the way of a man and his porn, weren't they?

    9. Re:how about bartering for access to the tower by fm6 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That says something about small-town versus big-town life. This guy couldn't get the church to install a small repeater in their belfry, but nobody cares if he has a 60' tower on his property. In the big city, churches vie with each other to put transmitters in their towers (nice source of revenue), but a homeowner would never get a 60' tower past the zoning board, the local homeowner's assocation, the neighbors concerned about property values...

    10. Re:how about bartering for access to the tower by Usquebaugh · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's mine, do you hear? Mine, all mine. Lovely bandwidth, and I'll be damned if I'm gonna share it with the likes of you.

    11. Re:how about bartering for access to the tower by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      In a city you'd have ordinances and "CC&Rs" preventing you from building any structure over 6'. They're called ordinances in cities, and home owners associations in suburbs. In both cases they're pwn3d by local monopolies which feel their overpriced service adequately suits your needs. The flock of old ladies who think the towers are "eye sores" are their weapons.

    12. Re:how about bartering for access to the tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it was a christian church, everyone else has temples.

    13. Re:how about bartering for access to the tower by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Old ladies? I used to work for a company that provided management services to homeowner's associations, which job entailed attending a lot of association board meetings. Lots of basically intelligent and tolerant people would expend major hassles over things like satellite dishes. Now the sight of a dish is not something I could ever bring myself to care about, but many homeowners get darned worked up about it. They'd ban them completely if they could, but since they can't, the jump through hoops making them as inconspicuous as they possibly can.

      OK, that's just bizarre. But sometimes people have a point. Like once my parents lived in a little neighborhood of one-story houses, and one of their neighbors decided they just had to have a sort of penthouse room on their roof. Went ahead and built it without getting planning permission. Not only was the thing as ugly as hell, but it destroyed the privacy of everybody on the block.

      I don't think it's too much to expect recourse for something like that. The question is, once you start making rules, where do you stop?

    14. Re:how about bartering for access to the tower by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      No, overengineering was the amount of concrete he buried. He's got enough foundation for a tower twice that height. No, make that three times. All he really needed was four feet (no, wait, he's in Canada; make that 3.3 meters unless he's in Quebec in which case make it 3.3 metres) of Sonatube filled with about four square feet of concrete; barely more than a yard.

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    15. Re:how about bartering for access to the tower by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      s/3.3/1.3/g
      Sigh.

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    16. Re:how about bartering for access to the tower by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1
      To summarize, in big cities, neighbors are sucking.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    17. Re:how about bartering for access to the tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only losers use digg. Real people use http://www.yigg.de/

    18. Re:how about bartering for access to the tower by Thing+1 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      The question is, once you start making rules, where do you stop?

      When you realize that you're killing Jews?

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    19. Re:how about bartering for access to the tower by fm6 · · Score: 1

      I don't think genocide has ever been an issue in zoning laws.

    20. Re:how about bartering for access to the tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm... You've already killed all the Indians and Buffalo in your country ....

    21. Re:how about bartering for access to the tower by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      the neighbors concerned about property values...

      That's because those neighbors place $0 value on freedom.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    22. Re:how about bartering for access to the tower by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Another idiotic libertarian who equates "freedom" with "fuck you".

    23. Re:how about bartering for access to the tower by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      And so you would abridge my right to say, "fuck you"? Lovely.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    24. Re:how about bartering for access to the tower by fm6 · · Score: 1
      No, I just don't think you're inability to say "fuck you" whenever you want is a serious blow to personal freedom. Not every restriction on what you do or say is organized repression. If you say, "the government is corrupt" and you have to go to prison, then you're a represeed freedom fighter. But if you say, "You fuckers are not going to take away my fucking satellite dish because your motherfucking CC&Rs are a goddamn violation of my fucking rights", and you're told to leave the homeowner's association meeting, then you're just an immature asshole who doesn't know how to talk to people.

      Libertarians like to tell each other that every rule that society imposes on them is a sign of repression. But in the grownup world, life is about comprimise -- not everybody gets everything they want. Sane rules codify these comprises. Sure, some rules are repressive. But the measure of repressiveness isn't how many selfish people whine about obeying them.

    25. Re:how about bartering for access to the tower by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Libertarians like to tell each other that every rule that society imposes on them is a sign of repression. But in the grownup world, life is about comprimise -- not everybody gets everything they want. Sane rules codify these comprises. Sure, some rules are repressive. But the measure of repressiveness isn't how many selfish people whine about obeying them.

      Why would a libertarian move into a commune where he had to abide by repressive rules? This doesn't make sense. What people complain about are ex post facto rules imposed to try to bully someone out of doing something he's already done in accordance with existing rules.

      "Oh, my God, Mildred painted her house purple. We need to pass a new ordinance!" and that sort of thing.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  7. hmm by eobanb · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I'm wondering what sort of internet access this actually is. Wi-Fi? Anyway, this seems a little silly; it seems like he could run some co-ax and position a smaller antenna so that it's not being obscured by the church. Or how about just asking the church if he can put a small antenna in their steeple and re-broadcast it (either in its original form or with wi-fi or something)? I'm sure they'd be fine with that. I'd only put a tower up like this if it came with other benefits (maybe if I decided to put a TV and radio antenna on it also).

    --

    Take off every sig. For great justice.

    1. Re:hmm by York+the+Mysterious · · Score: 1

      I would guess it's Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service http://www.answers.com/topic/multichannel-multipoi nt-distribution-service

      --

      Tim Smith - Ramblings from Nerd Land
  8. Why didn't he use some kind of missile? by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Man: Well I've always said, There's nothing an agnostic can't do if he really doesn't know whether he believes in anything or not.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  9. Rohn 25 by smnolde · · Score: 2, Informative
    Buy some used rohn 25 or similar at a ham radio hamfest or swapfest. The tower comes in 10 foot sections and is self supporting to 60 feet. Put half a section in a yard of cement and go up from there. A hinge bracket at the bottom rocks all.

    And if you have more money to spend get a Hazer system so you don't have to climb the tower to get your antennas to the top.

    1. Re:Rohn 25 by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      Yep. That's what I did when I needed a tower. Worked great! Got my no-fear-of-heights friend to climb the tower and aim the antenna.

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    2. Re:Rohn 25 by mwilliamson · · Score: 1

      Self supporting to 60 feet? Bullshit!!!

    3. Re:Rohn 25 by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Maybe not, but Rohn SCL can do 80 feet unsupported... At least.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Rohn 25 by tcgroat · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Rohn 25G topwers on hinged bases are not self-supporting at any height. They must always be guyed or bracketed to a building.


      Also, since he mentioned paying Canadian dollars for it, ice loading will limit the self-supporting height. With 1/2" ice load the best you can do is 20 feet, in a low wind area and a small antenna. Even in a mild climate, the safe limit for self-supported 25G is 40 feet.


      Do what the manufacturer says. They know where the failure point is. Overloaded towers will fail, it's a matter of when--not if.

    5. Re:Rohn 25 by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      Interesting. My 50' tower supported against a building at 15' had a 1" ice load and didn't fail. No wind, though. None at all. Damn good thing, because trees were falling all around us. You could go outside and hear another limb crack every 30 seconds. The trees still haven't fully recovered from the Great Ice Storm of 1998.

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    6. Re:Rohn 25 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lessons learned today:
      -Antennae are easy to build
      -Don't surf for porn and post to Slashdot at the same time.

  10. The atheist solution by Tx · · Score: 5, Funny

    Personally, I'd have knocked down the church instead. Less practical, but infinitely more satisfying.

    --
    Oh no... it's the future.
    1. Re:The atheist solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I willing to bet the church wanted nothing to do with a tower. Those pastors know how much porn would be flowing through that thing.

      "Heres the church, heres the steeple, broadcasting sodomy to all the people."

    2. Re:The atheist solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm agnostic. I'm not sure if I want to demolish the church or not.
      Sometimes it seems like a good idea, other times ... not so much.

    3. Re:The atheist solution by Surt · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's the solution they've been trying in Alabama, but people keep repairing the churches and putting out the fires.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    4. Re:The atheist solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:The atheist solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were a conservative Athiest, you would outsource the work to your local Klan.

    6. Re:The atheist solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      This story is another case of the church blocking the future.

    7. Re:The atheist solution by mobby_6kl · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Less practical, but infinitely more satisfying.

      What do you mean "less practical"? I'd say that by knocking down the church, you'd increase the area's average "practical" rate by quite a bit!

    8. Re:The atheist solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      {\sarcasm Why stop there? Let's burn all the muslims and black people as well. That would do wonders for "practical," and oh so very satisfying.} Oh, it's only offensive if you make fun of Christians, huh?

    9. Re:The atheist solution by linnerd40 · · Score: 1

      Excellent thought, may I join?

      --
      The box said: Requires Windows 98 or better. So I installed Linux!
    10. Re:The atheist solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Only in context. If the problem was a tall Mosque or Shaq blocking the signal, then it would make sense in context. Comparing buildings to groups of people is completely missing the point, but even if we were going to the crux of your argument -- making fun of your precious flight of fancy -- then yes, it would be funny, if the building in question were not a church. Guess what? You have a faith. Guess what? People think your faith is pathetic. Guess what? I have a faith -- or a lack of faith. Guess what? People think my lack of faith is pathetic. I guess we're both just going to have to accept that, aren't we?

    11. Re:The atheist solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only difference is, I would never mock you, or anyone, for their faith.

    12. Re:The atheist solution by NATIK · · Score: 1

      You mocked his faith in the practicality of knocking down the church.

    13. Re:The atheist solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I you don't want to knock it down yourself spread the word that there are Cartoons in the church.

    14. Re:The atheist solution by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 1

      Don't forget there are also some cyborgs that find your lack of faith.... disturbing.

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    15. Re:The atheist solution by DreadHarn · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      And your post is another case of prejudice against Christians

    16. Re:The atheist solution by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 2, Funny

      A man is trying to build a bar in a location that happens to be one block from a conservative church. The pastor of the church asks his congregation to pray that God intervene and prevent the bar from being built. Sure enough, the next day, the partially-constructed bar burns to the ground. The bar owner takes the church to court, where the pastor's lawyer argues that the church wasn't directly responsible for the fire. The judge replies, "Seems to me that the bartender believes more in the power of God than the pastor."

    17. Re:The atheist solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

    18. Re:The atheist solution by TheLink · · Score: 1

      But it was an act of God. So that makes it different ;).

      --
    19. Re:The atheist solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yours is an example of jokes flying 60 feet over people's heads.

    20. Re:The atheist solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not "pre"judice if you've been doing the same shit for 2,000 years.

    21. Re:The atheist solution by Xaroth · · Score: 1

      Personally, I find your lack of faith disturbing.

    22. Re:The atheist solution by DreadHarn · · Score: 0

      That figures the prejudiced would mod down someone who spoke against them. This simply proves that what I said was true.

    23. Re:The atheist solution by DreadHarn · · Score: 0

      Christians began the western move towards education and academics. Read your history books.

  11. Karma whore by LordSnooty · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's dying already.... Coral cache

    1. Re:Karma whore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Karm4 n00b stFU, Chuck norris, t3h pwn, and the next bringing, of elroy, all u pwn3d, the WoW is t3h suck.

      Bioware, t3h NWN:Diamond, pwn hard-0n.

      G3t s0m3 pwn, cause u t3h l4m3r , y34h 4nd I d1d h4v3 u|? m07h3r, lord 0v3r t3h 4ll and b0w.

      t3h fuck with, me not even.

      All you n00bs are t3h pwnd.

    2. Re:Karma whore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have a link to a cache of the cache of the article?

  12. "Taken from the article" by yottabite · · Score: 0

    "this is a direct quote" and "so is this" read more

  13. A Weather Balloon Is Cheaper (and Portable) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Use a weather balloon. It's cheaper and, as long as it's tied down, legal.

    And you can sell ad space to pay for it!

  14. Planning? by megla · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's some impressive DIY.
    However, in my country (the UK), you can't just slap up something like that without going through an extremely tedious planning consultation with the local authority - usually your city or district council. This is both expensive (all has to be nice and legal etc) and time consuming. If you put it up without planning, you can apply for retrospective planning permission, but if it's refused then you have to tear it down (or the men in suits come do it for you). Quite a deterrant to similar DIY projects.
    What sort of approval (if any) is needed for this sort of thing stateside?

    1. Re:Planning? by Desert+Raven · · Score: 1

      It depends entirely on where you live.

      The larger the municipality, the more unlikely it is you will get the permits for it. However, in unincorporated land, you might not need any permit at all.

    2. Re:Planning? by istartedi · · Score: 1

      My thoughts too. In the states you have to check local zoning. That's usually at the city or county level, but to be safe check to make sure the state doesn't care. Then at the lower levels you may have community covenants or home owner's associations. It's not impossible though. In Springfield, VA where I grew up there was a ham who had some towers on his property not much smaller than this. His neighbors must have hated him, but it was all legal. It may have been grandfathered in from before though, since things seem to have gotten more restrictive.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    3. Re:Planning? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      btw the article submitter was in canada not the USA.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    4. Re:Planning? by topham · · Score: 1


      If he has a ham license it is almost impossible to stop him.

      As long as the installation is not a saftyhazard and meets a few, basic requirements it will be approved. Even if the local community doesn't want it.

      My question isn't why didn't he talk with the church, it's quite possibly they would have allowed a passive repeater on the roof. A lot less work.

    5. Re:Planning? by Detritus · · Score: 1
      In many places in the USA, if it's below a certain maximum height, you don't need permission. If it's above that height, you may need more paperwork.

      Zoning commissions also need a better reason than "I think towers are ugly" to deny a permit, or they can get in trouble with the FCC, which regulates telecommunications at the federal level.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    6. Re:Planning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Seeing that he lives in a tiny town with less than 2000 people in Canada I think the official process of obtaining a license to build a 60 feet tower in his back yard consists of the following steps:

      Pick up phone and call the local Mayor
      "Hey Bobbeee, I'm aboot to build a huge ass tower in my backyard. Can I get permission?"
      "Only if you buy me some beer eh"
      "Righto"

    7. Re:Planning? by Lumpy · · Score: 1, Informative

      Impressive? Ham radio operators have been doing it for more than 50 years now. NOTHING that he did was new, innovative or interesting in any way. Ham radio operators always knew that you can get free antenna towers by knocking on a door and asking "I'll take down that ugly tower for you for free." Anyone paying for a used old tower is nuts. And everything else he did was plain old silly. He could have easily dont it by cooperation with the owner of the WIFI signal he was trying to steal and a pair of cantennas bouncing it off a house across the street. (Yes flat aluminum sided houses make awesome Wifi reflectors. I did this about 3 years ago for a friend that wanted to share wifi with a friend down the street. 2 primestar dishes and 1 house at the right angle across the street and we had a wifi link.)

      Just because someone finally discovers what Ham Radio operators have known for decades certianly does not warrent front page on slashdot.

      Hey I hacked a "easy" button toy from a popular office supply store to spew profanity as a practical joke at work... can I get a front page story?

      It must be a really slow news day.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:Planning? by ehrichweiss · · Score: 1

      Can you give some info on this? I'm highly interested. I'm guessing that it's because you would be someone the community would possibly be relying on in case of an emergency.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    9. Re:Planning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not funny! He is a blessed one. God help him.

    10. Re:Planning? by corychristison · · Score: 0
      I am from Canada, and live in a fairly small city. We have some really small communities right around here. I feel it would be more like this:

      *pick up phone and call the local Mayor*
      "Hey Bobbeee, I'm aboot to build a huge ass tower in my backyard. Can I get permission?"
      "How come, eh?"
      "Damn church is blocking my porn[read: internet] signal, eh."
      "I'll bring the beer and matches, if you bring the gasoline, eh?"

      Don't you love how us Canadians can take pride in laughing at ourselves, yet when it comes to the US, they tend to get all bitchy? ;-)

    11. Re:Planning? by ToasterofDOOM · · Score: 1

      All my American friends and I love bashing the US! My history teacher bashes every president we've had, and he's as American as you get. (Today we proved that Lincoln was as close to a dictator as we've ever had in the US and might have possibly saved the entire 20th century) I think everyone can bash their own country, and most are OK about others poking fun at them, but some people just have no sense of humor, like some Americans I know.

      --
      I am Spartacus
    12. Re:Planning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Niggers laugh at each other all the time, but when it comes to someone else doing it they get bitchy...

      Same thing.

    13. Re:Planning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did you read it, nimrod? the kid's only 15.

    14. Re:Planning? by gizmo01 · · Score: 1

      I'm not quite sure what the big deal is either. When was in need of a tower for the same reason, I found out a friend's sister had one. It turned out that they mounted their satellite dish on it and it always went out because the tower was shaky. I got their tower for free and I roof-mounted their dish. They have no more reception issues and I got my tower.

      Wow, this has to be one of the least interesting stories I've ever read here.

  15. Two Points by Trip+Ericson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1. In the discussion over on Digg, it was noted that he was able to build this cheaper than most would because he had "connections."

    2. To those asking if this is Wi-Fi, it could be what I have. I'm not sure what it is, but it operates on the 900MHz band (I know, my cordless phone destroys the internet). I have a UHF Yagi in the attic pointed at a tower at the elementary school 3 miles away. The signal barely makes it over a hill in front of my house to get it. But I'm not complaining, I get 1Mbps both ways (128kb uploads, 128kb downloads) with it and it's neither a telco nor a cable co.

    1. Re:Two Points by Forbman · · Score: 1

      Same for me, thru OnlineMac (http://www.onlinemac.com/) wireless DSL. I get SDSL 768Kbps... No telco or cable company broadband bullshit service agreement issues, either. Little Yagi antenna on my roof, LOS to the tower.
      It's fast enough for me...

  16. chrch blocks access by Pugzilla · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hate when the church does that

  17. No kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    WTF is news about this? Ham operators have been installing 60' towers in their back yards for oh, about 100 years now. I totally don't get it.

  18. Ebay it by Life700MB · · Score: 1


    Just look for it at ebay!


    --
    Superb hosting 20GB Storage, 1_TB_ bandwidth, ssh, $7.95

    1. Re:Ebay it by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

      I wonder what category it would go under?

      White trash yard crap?
      subcategory:
      1) under 30' high
      2) 30' and over

      The perfect compliment to your half dozen broken down cars.
      Don't be outdone by your Neighbors! It normally takes decades
      to get your crap pile 60 ft high, what a conversation starter!

      --
      If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
  19. Zoning? by mordors9 · · Score: 1

    The Code Enforcement Officer will be out next week to fine him for the zoning violation.

    1. Re:Zoning? by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      I put a 50' tower up here and nobody complained.

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    2. Re:Zoning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even in an area where there is a code restriction, it can sometimes be overridden if the individual uses the antenna for amateur radio. I'd get a ham license just for that, even if I wasn't using the tower for such.

    3. Re:Zoning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody doesn't live in the city limits or some silly neighborhood.

    4. Re:Zoning? by Nick+Driver · · Score: 1

      In my town, the max limit for a private residential antenna tower is 75' and above that you have to apply for a special permit and buy and maintain at minumum half a million dollars liability insurance for the tower and name the city as a beneficiary of the policy.

  20. Lightning protection by Tiger4 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I saw he put a grounding line on the thing, and a ground rod. But Something that tall and close to an inhabited structure should really have a heavier line that goes right to the top. Lightning will fry that #6 conductor pretty fast, and then where will it want to run? Oh, by the way, he has thoughtfully provided a fortuitous conductor that leads directly into his computer! Two words, " lightning arrestor "

    And I wasn't too thrilled with his weld quality either. Looks like it was showing rust in the picture. And the bottom plate looked like it would hold water, not shed it. Overall, I'm not sure I'd want it next to my home.

    --
    Behold, this dreamer cometh. Come now, and let us slay him... and we shall see what will become of his dreams.
    1. Re:Lightning protection by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      Lighting rods don't necessarily conduct all of the lightning's current. One idea is that they conduct some current and ionize the air around them -- then the bulk of the current flows through that ionized air (just like the ionized air lightning usually flows through). Another theory is that they work to prevent lightning. This is one of those things that has led to much debate.

    2. Re:Lightning protection by Feanturi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Overall, I'm not sure I'd want it next to my home.

      But I'll bet he just claims he wants it for highspeed access. More likely, he's hoping he can luck out and get super-powers next time there's a lightning storm.

    3. Re:Lightning protection by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      A direct hit from lightning will fry a double aught (00) gague copper wire. you CANT control lightning all you can do is coerce it. the tower it's self is enough, just ground the leg at the bottom with a piece of 12-10 gague copper or aluminum wire to aground stake and that is enough. And it's only really for dissapating static and light electrical charges. you cant do a damned thing about a direct strike.

      Look at most barns and houses with lightning rods. they have 10 gague aluminum or steel wire running from the rod to the ground.

      a METAL tower can conduct millions of volts as well as a thick copper wire.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Lightning protection by njh · · Score: 1

      Bullcrap. This gets a lot of edit time on the Lightning rod wikipedia page without any reasonable justification. I did the calculations on the talk pages a while back:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Lightning_rod

      The lightning page states that each discharge produces 30kA. The conductor proposed (.25inch*.25inch*pi = 126mm^2) has a resistance of 1.6mR cm * 1m/126mm^2 = 0.13mR/m, each m weighs 126*9g = 1.14kg giving a heat capacity of 438 J/K per metre. Each m will drop 3V, i.e. 90kW of power. The flash lasts about 100ms so each meter of the bar has to dissipate 9kJ by heating by 20K. I think the mistake is to assume that because there is a lot of power dissipated in a strike, the conductor must dissipate a lot. In fact, as the conductor is probably 1 thousandth the total resistance of the strike it gets only 1 thousandth the power. njh 02:29, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

    5. Re:Lightning protection by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      >And I wasn't too thrilled with his weld quality either. Looks like it was showing rust in the picture.

      Steel falling from sixty feet is no joke. Especially if you're climbing it at the time to maintain equipment.

      I've heard of tightfisted scroungers who figured it was worth their money to get sections of secondhand tower *magnafluxed*. We are talking about life safety engineering here.

      Check with your local ham radio club if you want a tower, see arrl.org for a list of clubs. Offer to barter space at the top of your tower for engineering help.

    6. Re:Lightning protection by qzulla · · Score: 1
      And I wasn't too thrilled with his weld quality either. Looks like it was showing rust in the picture. And the bottom plate looked like it would hold water, not shed it. Overall, I'm not sure I'd want it next to my home.

      Dude! His dad did it. He said it wasn't that hard. Give him a break.

      Yeah, I'm a former and sometimes still welder. Certified 7018 vertical.

      It did make me cringe too.

      qz

    7. Re:Lightning protection by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      I liked your post, but I have no idea why you say "bullcrap". You're saying that a 1/2" diameter wire would only rise 20 degrees K, so it wouldn't be damaged. Nice work - I agree. But then you say that the conductor is probably only 1/1000th the resistance... I'm not sure what that means -- you must be talking about a parallel path because the current would be the same through a series path. 1/1000th the resistance contradicts your next statement -- lower resistance would take the majority of the power, so I assume you mean it it has higher resistance and takes 1/1000th the power. So, it sounds like you're agreeing to flow through a parallel ionization path and saying it would take 999/1000th the power.

      So, thanks for bringing numbers to the table, but I'm confused about your first word.

    8. Re:Lightning protection by Cecil · · Score: 1

      I think he's referring to the fact that most of the energy is dissipated earlier, as the lightning strike is travelling through the ionized air. The "high resistance" portion of the journey. High resistance means high power/heat dissipation. Since the tower is in relative terms extremely low resistance, it would not be dissipating nearly as much power.

      I could be wrong, though.

    9. Re:Lightning protection by njh · · Score: 1

      The bullcrap was about lightning prevention (sorry, I should have made that clear) and that the conductor isn't rated to survive a lightning hit. Parallel path seems very unlikely considering the available conductor density. If there were a parallel discharge one would expect melting or charring around conductors, either of which I've not seen.

      The resistance of the lightning rod might be 1000th the resistance of the whole strike (from cloud to ground), so although a lightning bolt has a high power, most of that power is being dissipated elsewhere. Lets work it out:

      An average bolt of negative lightning carries a current of 30 kiloamperes, transfers a charge of 5 coulombs, has a potential difference of about 100 megavolts and dissipates 500 megajoules (enough to light a 100 watt lightbulb for 2 months).

      You have: 100MV/30kA
      You want: ohm
                      * 3333.3333

      so a lightning discharge has a total resistance of 3K3 over say a distance of 3.3km, for a plasma resistance of 1ohm/m, nearly ten thousand times greater than that of the lightning rod, so it is unlikely that the lightning would choose to make its own path, and if it did, we would expect only 1/10000th the current to flow (a measly 3A).

      I promise I will never start a post with 'bullcrap' again, it's unhelpful to the discussion.

    10. Re:Lightning protection by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      Cool. I learned something, thanks.

      ps. I'm so full of crap, you could have been responding to any one of a number of things! :-)

    11. Re:Lightning protection by njh · · Score: 1

      I did too. I never considered that you could deduce the resistance of a lightning breakdown until your post.

    12. Re:Lightning protection by wkk2 · · Score: 1

      For a very good paper on lightning protection: http://www.weather.gov/directives/sym/pd03041006cu rr.pdf It's a National Weather Service Manual on lightning protection for sites that need serious protection. It has lots of ideas for bonding, ground improvement and surge protection.

  21. HOWTO: by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 5, Funny

    O.K., so I read this. The howto can be summarized thusly-

    1: Have a Father in the building trades

    2: "Dad, help!"

    --
    "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
    1. Re:HOWTO: by forgetful_ca · · Score: 1

      You forgot the obligatory

      3. ???

      4. Profit.

      This is slashdot, after all, and the proper forms of tired, hackneyed cliches must be observed.

  22. So what.. I built a solar powered repeater... by cowmix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I built a solar powered repeater for my Internet access. Where is my cookie?!

    http://cowmix.com/solar6/compressed/

    1. Re:So what.. I built a solar powered repeater... by SaDan · · Score: 1

      That's pretty spiffy. You DO deserve a cookie!

      Do you have plans for that setup on the web, or just the pictures? I'd be interested in seeing what you used to put that together.

    2. Re:So what.. I built a solar powered repeater... by commonchaos · · Score: 1

      I'm interested in this. Can you put more details online?

    3. Re:So what.. I built a solar powered repeater... by krbvroc1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I built a solar powered repeater for my Internet access. Where is my cookie?!

      Name: user
      Content: 10566:WEFiwgefWEFHwfweih
      Domain: .slashdot.org
      Path: /
      Send For: Any type of connection
      Expires: 05/01/2006 10:12:12 AM

    4. Re:So what.. I built a solar powered repeater... by dysan27 · · Score: 1

      Put an actual artical together and you too can be on /.
      I, for one, would be interested in the construction of a home built repeater

    5. Re:So what.. I built a solar powered repeater... by dysan27 · · Score: 1

      Thank-you, that comment made my day.

    6. Re:So what.. I built a solar powered repeater... by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Funny
    7. Re:So what.. I built a solar powered repeater... by cowmix · · Score: 1

      Setup: two 40 watt panel, two deep cycle marine batteries, a voltage regulator, two 24dbi gain 2.4gig antennas, some 'pro' 2.4 gig pre-amps and filters...

      It was used to 'repeat' a MMDS wireless Internet signal.. Unfortunately, it was an analog... one way repeater.. The upstream was via a modem.

      The equipement was placed here:

      http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&q=43908+N+10 th+St,+New+River,+AZ+85087&ll=33.883086,-112.06382 5&spn=0.006262,0.013561&t=h

    8. Re:So what.. I built a solar powered repeater... by Rick.C · · Score: 1
      Where is my cookie?!

      Call your local Girl Scout leader.

      --
      You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
      "Math in a song is good."-Linford
    9. Re:So what.. I built a solar powered repeater... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Expires: 05/01/2006 10:12:12 AM
      Sorry sir, that cookie has expired for our European friends.
    10. Re:So what.. I built a solar powered repeater... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Great, now I've got cookie crumbs in my monitor!!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    11. Re:So what.. I built a solar powered repeater... by Tiro · · Score: 1

      hahaha... I'm adding you as a friend

  23. Radio signal by evildogeye · · Score: 1

    There are some areas of Tucson, AZ in which you can get a high speed Internet signal via radio wave, but you need a line of sight that isn't available in many places. Unfortunately, most places which do not have line of sight to high speed Internet providers but are within their range have building codes against huge towers.

    1. Re:Radio signal by HazE_nMe · · Score: 1

      Back in '99 I had Sprint Broadband Direct (BBD) and they would install a little diamond shaped transceiver on your rooftop. It was really nice until they oversold the service and the speeds went to the gutter. It had terrible upload speed as well.
      I believe they used the existing infrastucture from People's Choice Television service that pulled out of Tucson a few years before Sprint started offering BBD. I ditched them once Cox got their act together in my neighborhood. Cable is infinetely better than BBD, but I would still use BBD if I lived in the sticks (Corona de Tucson), although Qwest is starting to offer DSL in more remote areas of Pima county.

    2. Re:Radio signal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Now You're Talking!": free, courtesy of your local library.

      Amateur Radio licensing exam: Fourteen dollars.

      A half-wave J-pole Antenna: Two dollars.

      A used VHF HT Radio: Twenty dollars.

      Telling some petty-ass shit-for-brains bureaucrat that his law doesn't apply to a federally licensed amateur radio tower: Priceless.

  24. personality by psycho+chic · · Score: 1

    wow, that guy must be the town weirdo...i dont know what i would think if someone asked to buy my farm's TV tower.

    1. Re:personality by lysergic.acid · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, but who cares what you think? You live on a farm.

      I kid, I kid. :-p

    2. Re:personality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of fucking idiot would call themselves 'smackhero'? I kid, I kid

  25. It is amazing... by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

    ...what some people will do to get their broadband - but I understand it. I wasn't here at the school 3 days before I was hanging out a 3rd story window running CAT 5 to my apartment.

    On another note, I wonder what you do to ground this sort of thing. I mean, we can get some pretty strong lightning here. How do you keep lightning from destroying your computer/wireless equipment in this case?

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    1. Re:It is amazing... by Gaewyn+L+Knight · · Score: 1

      Cat 5 usually handles surges fairly well... If you do have a problem it usually blows the port that you are connected to on each end but not the actual unit... This is where cheap 24 port hubs come in ;P

      --
      Telcos have alot of dark fibre in the States. Most people assume that's optical fibre...but it's actually moral fibre.
    2. Re:It is amazing... by Osty · · Score: 1

      On another note, I wonder what you do to ground this sort of thing. I mean, we can get some pretty strong lightning here. How do you keep lightning from destroying your computer/wireless equipment in this case?

      I assume you'd do the same thing you'd do in any other case of "tall stuff" (like a TV antenna) -- put a lightning rod on the tower that extends well above the tower's height, and run the insulated ground cable down to the ground.

    3. Re:It is amazing... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      How do you keep lightning from destroying your computer/wireless equipment in this case?

      you have two choices. You can pray to several gods or sacrifice livestock on a regular basis. Both of those are the most effective at protecting from lightning strikes.

      there is nothing technological you can do to protect against a direct lightning strike except for one thing.... Insurance.

      I insure everything in my home including my ham radio gear and then hope for a strike every thunderstorm. I call thunderstorms my "upgrade lottery" if I get a hit I get all new gear for a deep discount!

      Hell a strike 100 feet from your home will trash all your computers even if they are off from the massive EMP. A buddy of mine lost 4 laptops still in their boxes that way.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:It is amazing... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      My well's transformer pole got hit last year -- that's about 150 feet from my house. Zapped both transformers, their fuses, two 100A fuses in my breaker box, and my well's booster pump. Didn't affect anything in my house, tho.

      Even so, I had to replace a $700 pump (with a $500 deductable :(

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  26. Obsviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Another clear attempt by the church to block widespred broadcast of information.

    They dont want another renaissance!

    Down with them all!

    1. Re:Obsviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rATHER FUNNY THAT THE cANDIAN CLAIMS HIS CEMENT TUBES ARE 1 METER IN DIAMETER AND MAYBE THREE FEET LONG, WHEN THEY ARE MORE LIKE 6 FEET LONG.oF COURSE HE DOESNT KNOW THIS SINCE THEY USE METRIC SYSTEM

    2. Re:Obsviously... by mabinogi · · Score: 2, Informative

      um...no.
      those tubes are defintely not six feet long if they're a metre in diameter.
      Six feet is 1.8m - they're definitely not longer than they are wide.

      It is actually entirely possible for those of us using metric to understand the relative sizes of legacy measurement systems.
      Apparently it's not so easy the other way round ;)

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    3. Re:Obsviously... by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      That's why he used two tubes, furthermore he's Canadian, or better be if he's paying people in Candian money, so your impression that metric users understand standard measurements is a bit off.

    4. Re:Obsviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um...what?

      his understanding is perfectly fine.
      I think it's your reading comprehension that needs work..

      oh, and BTW - the lack of "standard" units is exactly why Metric exists.

    5. Re:Obsviously... by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      "um...no. those tubes are defintely not six feet long if they're a metre in diameter. Six feet is 1.8m - they're definitely not longer than they are wide."

      Correct, they are not six feet long, as I posted they are three feet long he used two of them according to the article to acheive a total of six feet. From TFA: "As I mentioned, my father works in a cement shop, creating things like cement piping. They also make cement sections that look like pieces of a cement tube, 1 meter in diameter and maybe 3 feet long."

      What exactly did I miss in my reading comprehension?

      BTW, English Imperial units, or english standard as I was always raised to call them, are all those things like feet and miles that are not metric. So although in many places metric might be a standard, that's not the context the word was used in.

    6. Re:Obsviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you missed the post that I was replying to, that's what you missed.

      I also understood what you meant by standard. I was just making a dig at how non-standard the so-called Standard units are.

  27. The Church May Let You Hang An Antenna... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    on/from their tower.

    No need to be contentious - most pastors are open to such ideas, especially if there's a problem. They're usually really nice people and understand.

    Why not try the direct approach, that is, just ask them?!

    1. Re:The Church May Let You Hang An Antenna... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Hey padre, I'm trying to download some gay midget goat porn off of eMule, do you think you could let me put this antenna on your church to help?"

  28. This is off-topic but... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I at was 7-11 this morning when a guy got pissed off at a store clerk and followed him outside arguing. His wife said, "Does he want to go back to prison? Only a stupid man would go back to prison!" The other store clerk replied, "Not unless he's homesick."

  29. This guy is the Internet's natural enemy by Thundersnatch · · Score: 1

    So he digs a 7-foot deep hole, using a backhoe, without even consulting the local utility companies? Right next to a commercial building no less. The jerk is lucky he didn't hit gas or sewer mains...

    1. Re:This guy is the Internet's natural enemy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was done in the countryside... folks there usually don't have city gas and sewer lines. They know were their gas and septic tanks are located. It might be hard for city slickers to understand this.

    2. Re:This guy is the Internet's natural enemy by big+tex · · Score: 2, Informative

      Really the only good way to dig a hole, actually.
      I don't know what the number is in canada, but 800-dig-safe gets you to a office where the utilities will mark out your property. Works great and it's the law.

      Although, I'm much more scared about his globby welding.
      Yikes.

      --
      I think I need a new sig here.
    3. Re:This guy is the Internet's natural enemy by WRoach · · Score: 1

      1- There is no gas lines available in this guy's town (very few cities have it in quebec)
      2- Sewer lines are burried under the road. So there's no problem digging in your backyard.

    4. Re:This guy is the Internet's natural enemy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he just forgot to mention that he called the utilities first.

    5. Re:This guy is the Internet's natural enemy by Maskull · · Score: 1

      Indeed. If he used a backhoe you'd expect him to take out somebody's fiber.

    6. Re:This guy is the Internet's natural enemy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you've been a city dweller all your life, you probably don't relate to the rural situation, where, frequently, the "local utilities" are either nonexistant, or, at best, a co-op, where *you*, the co-op member, are the "local utilities", and *your* investments make things like electrical and water distribution possible. In my hometown, residential water service was not taken for granted -- either you contributed to the supply with a well on your property, or you persuaded the co-op members to let you in (not really possible!), or you waited for someone to die, literally. When you wanted things like power and water lines, that "last mile" was entirely up to you. My family ceded a piece of land to the county once, in part because it meant they would maintain the road, and because nice new power lines were eventually part of the deal.

      Getting a place like that into the internet age is nothing short of a miracle. It wasn't all that long ago that the best we could do for phone service was party-lines. You kids don't even want to *think* about what that was like.

      Anyway, the point is, in plenty of places -- *most* of the country, perhaps -- there's no authority that can tell you not to build a 60' tower on your property...

      A lot of the posters seem to have an idea that the guy built this tower in a densely populated urban spot with small yards and houses within sight of each other. Though, personally, I'm wondering how a church steeple is a problem.

    7. Re:This guy is the Internet's natural enemy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sewer lines are burried under the road. So there's no problem digging in your backyard.

      How does it get from your house to the road? Maybe Quebec does things a little different but most places use pipe for that as well.

    8. Re:This guy is the Internet's natural enemy by Thundersnatch · · Score: 1

      They have a similar service called JULIE here in the states: Joint Utility Location... something or other. Anyway, they come out and mark, and surprisingly, you don't have to pay a dime (besides what you pay on your utility bills of course).

  30. Picture of the tower? by Zaurus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Four whole pages with pictures, and NO PICTURE OF THE TOWER?

    I want my $0 back.

    1. Re:Picture of the tower? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      there is at the bottom of the last page. maybe you just had loading problems (the site timed out once on an entire page for me and needed some refreshing to get all the images. coral cache was even worse)

      the image with the whole tower can be found at http://www.short-media.com/images/articles/tower_i mages/final.jpg

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    2. Re:Picture of the tower? by Zaurus · · Score: 1

      Ah, closure. Thanks.

      I let all the images load from all four pages, or so I thought, but that one wasn't there.

  31. And what do you know by roman_mir · · Score: 4, Funny

    so what happened in the next few weeks?
    (multiple choice questions)
    A. The church was blown up in a terrorist attack.
    B. The churche's tower was raised by 60 more feet to get the honest christ followers closer to their god.
    C. Rogers finally started providing cable Internet at that location.
    D. FBI came to the guy's house with various questions on the suspicious activity and took the tower as material proof from the possible crime scene.

    or

    E. A bunch of angry construction workers burned the house down for stealing all that cement, cement rings and the freaking tower? :)

    ---

    Really, the story should've been called "A man finds a way to get a whole bunch of stuff for free and installs a tower in the meanwhile."

    1. Re:And what do you know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      E. A bunch of angry construction workers burned the house down for stealing all that cement, cement rings and the freaking tower? :)

      In his defense, all the concrete stuff was unsellable for one reason or another, and he did pay for the tower (not very much, but it's not like he stole it from its former owners). Now the nearly-free forklift, backhoe, and crane use that he got, that's another story...

    2. Re:And what do you know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my first thought after reading the article was this man is a
      leach sucking blood where he can get it free. then I remembered I got an alpha for free this way and just kept my mouth shut

    3. Re:And what do you know by Dzimas · · Score: 1
      D. FBI came to the guy's house with various questions on the suspicious activity and took the tower as material proof from the possible crime scene.

      Errm... why the hell would we let the American FBI into Canada?

    4. Re:And what do you know by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      For the comic value of-course.
      But if you insist, it could be the RCMP.

    5. Re:And what do you know by Jardine · · Score: 1

      But if you insist, it could be the RCMP.

      The article mentions he's in Quebec. They have their own provincial police force.

  32. main problem with the hole digging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    was getting all that damned fiber out of the way..

  33. 60 Foot Lightning Rod by BiggRanger · · Score: 1

    That'll be good for his wireless reception. BANG!

  34. Wuss! by davidc · · Score: 3, Funny

    50 foot tower?

    Pah!

    He should'a installed a space elevator in his yard. Advantages: antenna can be positioned at any altitude, communications with access points, police, aliens, etc. rendered easy. Pays for itself from orbital launch fees. Can be covered with tasteful beanstalk for camouflage.

    Aliens? Where's that nanotube hat of mine?

  35. Probably by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its probly a small little ISP like Microserv http://home.ida.net/ I use it when I come back home every summer. It's great because the only other choice we would have is Comcast Cable(which is quite popular in our town) or Qwest DSL(expensive!)

  36. He should of saved his money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I hear these are a good way of removing things that get in the way at the moment
    looks like a few WiFi fans who have started already

  37. Slashdotted! by wildzeke · · Score: 1

    Can everyone stop going to the site for 15 minutes so I can read the story?

    Thanks!

    1. Re:Slashdotted! by bob122989 · · Score: 0

      so your saying it takes you 15 minutes to load a single webpage? or are you saying it will take you 15 minutes to find the top of the /. page and click the link?

  38. Non-Permanent Structure (UK) by Burning+Plastic · · Score: 1

    If you set it up so that you can take it down then it comes under the non-permanent structure legislation (like scaffolding and basic garden sheds). By doing this, you can have it in place for as long as you want unless someone makes a direct complaint, and by that point you should be able to have planning permission for a permanent one ready...

    --
    [All Your Fish Are Belong To Us]
  39. Great idea, but wouldn't cable be better? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 0

    I've helped set up cable modem service in a town of 1,000 people. It's not hard, you keep all the stuff in the city hall/library building (or fire station, or whatever), usually in a closet.

    Then you just run the wires along the main drag and spin out from there.

    Once it's up and running, you set up a base station for the cable (could use a satellite feed too, depends on where you are), then to get wireless most people just buy something like the cheap $29 cable modem 11b/g wireless basestation I have.

    Most installations like that can get 8-10 Mbps, and even if you can't get good equipment, it's not hard to get 2-4 Mbps up and running.

    I think they even have federal and state grants you can apply for, especially if you make sure it has a hookup for the wireless in the library, firestation, or city hall (usually, you only have one place, but it's the big building).

    If you live in feedlot country, it might be the Grange.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Great idea, but wouldn't cable be better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Comcast speed/reliability doesn't even come close... Static IP(s) possible? How about a symmetrical connection?

      I know my [home] wireless connection has been reliable enough to move telco POTS lines over to VoIP. Static IP and proper reverse DNS is very helpful too. The 10Mbit uplink (both up and down stream speeds) absolutely smokes anything I've seen Comcast offer -- or DSL for that matter... Fortunately I sit in one of the highest areas in town with no obstructions to my ISP's antenna's. Otherwise -- I'd be putting up a tower too!

      My ISP doesn't have any issue with me running on a home account using my own [home] domain. I host my own DNS, Email, Web Server, Video-Monitoring, etc. Whatever I want. Of course I'd expect them to want me to go to the "business" account if I was using their connection for profit (I am not) -- otherwise the bottom line is that the browsing data, email data (in and out), etc ... would all be going over their bandwidth. Why piss off the customer and limit them (they do not)?

      Comcast and at&t (SBC) certainly don't offer such options. A symmetrical connection *is* key...

  40. Color me unimpressed by grioghar · · Score: 1

    We've been doing this for 6 years now. We built a 70ft tower to get a lawyer here in town on, and this tower was built ON HIS ROOF, guide cables and all. All that, just so he had low ping times to one of the greatest Quake II servers ever, quakeII.kansas.net.

    --
    Can you ping me now? Gooood! | Manhappenin.Net - Things to do
    1. Re:Color me unimpressed by AJWM · · Score: 2, Funny

      We built a 70ft tower to get a lawyer here in town on,

      Sounds like an excellent use of it, too. Noose or cage?

      --
      -- Alastair
    2. Re:Color me unimpressed by geekylinuxkid · · Score: 1

      True, but KansasNet has horrible restrictions. I'd much rather enjoy my 9mb/1mb cable connection from cox for a measly $40/month. Fuck all the contracted bullshit of KansasNet. oh yea, Rock Chalk Jayhawk. KU!

    3. Re:Color me unimpressed by grioghar · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I don't make the rules, I just tell people about them.

      And yes, ROCK CHALK JAYHAWK. I'm a KU man myself. =)

      --
      Can you ping me now? Gooood! | Manhappenin.Net - Things to do
    4. Re:Color me unimpressed by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

      Suppository?

  41. Stick it to the Lord! by dokebi · · Score: 1

    Good job sticking it to God. And when he tries to strike you down with a Thunderbold, your tower will save you!

    --
    In Soviet Russia, articles before post read *you*!
    1. Re:Stick it to the Lord! by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Some guy a few miles east of Helena, Montana, built this mondo cross out of 55 gallon drums. It was about 15 drums tall, or about 60 feet.

      Even so, his faith was evidently somewhat lacking, because he felt a need to brace it up with half a dozen guy wires.

      It may be there yet, for all I know.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  42. Amazing. by limesmj · · Score: 1

    The lengths people will go through to get the pr0n faster.

  43. Hello... by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    it's like, Canada Eh?

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  44. MOD PARENT FUNNIEST POST ALL DAY by mythosaz · · Score: 1, Funny

    Dear sir, my lack of mod-points prohibits me from giving you what you deserve. Actually, mod him informative or insightful - karma's a good thing.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT FUNNIEST POST ALL DAY by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Actually, mod him informative or insightful

      Yes, good idea... That way you'll be shot-down in M2, and never get mod points again.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  45. Uhm, so? by windsurfer619 · · Score: 1

    This is a little... well, mundane. I live in a neighbourhood that doesn't have highspeed, but a neighbour of mine built a 100 foot tower, costing him over 6000$ to build. He's also paying approx. 130 dollars a month to get a static IP and only 2 Mbs. Honestly, i don't see what the big deal is.

  46. Re:Rohn 25 [bangbus?] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Methinks you posted the wrong file:
    File: Bangbus - Episode 53 - Ritta.mpg

  47. QSL by Nethead · · Score: 2

    I'll have to submit this to some of the ham radio boards. I bet those guys never thought of putting an antenna high in the air!

    --
    -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    1. Re:QSL by geekoid · · Score: 1

      In the air? crap, that's what I've been doing wrong.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:QSL by Nethead · · Score: 1
      Actually, the ARRL Stealth Antenna book does show a few ways around that :)

      73 de w7com

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  48. better have a mondo surge protector ... by Wansu · · Score: 1, Redundant



    I'm talking about those big honkin' surge protectors like the power company uses that attach to a ground stake and the coax feedline runs through it. He also better have a good quality grounding system. All towers get hit by lightning sooner or later. Yessir. The nail that sticks up gets pounded.

    --
    Wansu, th' chinese sailor
    1. Re:better have a mondo surge protector ... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Lightning hit the transformer pole (an ordinary power pole) just down the street from me. The resulting surge blew out the two transformers, their associated fuses-the-size-of-truck-shocks, two 100 amp fuses in my breaker box, and after all that, still had enough juice left to zap my well pump and let out all its magic smoke.

      Right-o, let's put a lightning rod in the back yard, sounds dandy!!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  49. Re:Rohn 25 [bangbus?] by Suidae · · Score: 2, Funny

    Methinks you posted the wrong file:
    File: Bangbus - Episode 53 - Ritta.mpg


    Whats really sad is that I recognize that one by name.

  50. The lightning rod by rsilvergun · · Score: 2, Funny

    is in case his town is visited by an evil Circus.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:The lightning rod by TheGhostOfDerrida · · Score: 1

      What would you give a man who could make your deepest dreams come true? (if those dreams involve cigars rolled on the thighs of beautiful cuban women)

      --
      Paul: If you're reading this, pick your shoes up out of the hallway. I keep tripping over them. Slob.
  51. This reminds me of the time... by dtrmp4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Some random guy came over to our house about 5-6 years ago after my dad moved out and asked about our tower that my dad didn't bother to take with him. He told us that he'd take it to his house and check it out and make sure it still worked and give us a price etc. We haven't heard from him since. But anyways, he must be pretty lucky: I've been using this service for quite some time without any problem. Rain and storms do not affect the speed in any way I could notice. Our old antenna (not the one mentioned above) got owned by lightning.

  52. I did this as well by ksm2552 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I built a 62 foot tower in my yard to connect to buddy with high speed access. Just when we about to start his tower, they ran cable-internet done my road. I was pissed, yet happy at the same time. Still out about $800 though.

  53. tough job, you gotta thank somebody after that by has2k1 · · Score: 1
    Final costs:

    * About 14,000 pounds of cement

    * About $404 CND (including ISP installation)

    * Days and days of work

    After that, go to church and thank God you completed successfully.

    1. Re:tough job, you gotta thank somebody after that by FusionDragon2099 · · Score: 1

      Well, at least he doesn't have to go far.

    2. Re:tough job, you gotta thank somebody after that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw God. If it wasn't for God and his fan club, the dude wouldn't have had to go to all that trouble in the first place.

  54. 4400? by antdude · · Score: 1

    It reminds me of an episode (can't find it) where these guys built a tower made out of various pieces. Maybe this guy is doing the same. [grin]

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  55. That guy needs a life by danimrich · · Score: 3, Funny

    Getting high speed internet was the most challenging experience in my life. That guy needs a life!

    --
    where's all that Karma?
    1. Re:That guy needs a life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's only 17.

  56. The easy way... by gazpa · · Score: 0

    He can pick a work as "good shepherd" at church, and put the receiver in the church.

  57. Cheap home made tower by rm_monterey · · Score: 1

    I had a very similar problem. The ISP told me I needed a 30' tower which would require digging, concrete, ground wires and possibly a permit.
    Solution: I bought 3x10' steel fence poles (for a chainlink fence) for $15. Stacked them on top of each other and tied them to a tall, straight pine tree in my yard. My ISP says it was their first "tree install" but they have recommended this to others in the area.

  58. Seek advice on building high structures by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

    Perhaps from students of a top engineering school.

    Go Aggies.

  59. Mine's Bigger by SaidinUnleashed · · Score: 2, Funny

    I live in a rural part of the country, and had to put up an 80ft tower to get crappy WiMAX connection.

    So, WHERE'S MY SLASHDOT ARTICLE, BITCH?!

    --
    Shiny. Let's be bad guys.
    1. Re:Mine's Bigger by Anamanaman · · Score: 1

      Details?

  60. Not quite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot is for slack jawed, brain dead retards who want to pretend they are nerds but actually don't know their ass from a hole in the ground, and the people who get a kick out of the "insightful" posts the afore mentioned retards make. Digg is for people who are just as stupid, but at least admit they are cluess instead of pretending to be l33t.

  61. This happens all over the place here by Alethes · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm in a rural part of Ontario with no cable or DSL and several of us in this area have 50 foot towers so we can get high speed access. It's an expensive option, but if nothing else is available, you do what you have to do.

    1. Re:This happens all over the place here by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Could you link to your provider? This sounds like good progress for rural folks. Any mountains up your way?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  62. Wisp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is almost certainly what it is. A WISP (wireless ISP) can set these up for relatively little money, so it's OK for smaller communities, and they transfer data about twice as fast as most DSL. I believe that his transfer rates are 300KB/s, and my DSL runs at about 100KB/s. My town of 10,000 has a company providing the same wireless service.

  63. Geeks are more like hams by leighklotz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Geeks are more hams every day with their antenna farms.

    Try reading about tower review, or join in on Tower Talk.

    Better yet, get a ham license. The technician test isn't even that hard.

  64. Good Old Boy... by skogs · · Score: 3, Informative

    Good old boys should sometimes stay inside watching tv, then get up and go to the bar.

    The new splash of paint he put on was indeed absolutely mandatory - corrosion Control is a big deal in towers. You must grind off all the rust you can find, and place a good sealing paint meant for this purpose on it, completely cover everything. Use galvanized bolts, and preferably inspect them occasionally. I know its hard at home, but it should be done at least every few years so that you don't end up with a tower section in your living room.

    Lightning rods....Lightning rods don't keep your tower from being hit. In fact they increase the likelyhood of them getting hit as it brings 'the ground' closer to the cloud that is making the big booms. The point of a lighting rod is to provide a path of least resistance for all those lightning strikes so that it goes to ground through the damn rod instead of through your computer equipment.

    Erg. Simpletons.

    --
    Who is this that even the wind and the waves obey Him? Surely this computer must submit also!
  65. From tfa by sodul · · Score: 1

    The location is just beyond the side of the church's bell-tower and aligned with the transmitting tower. Perfect.

    Amazing he was lucky enough to get 2 points aligned !!!

    Joke aside, good job, I just hope for him that it will not fall on a post office customer.

  66. used tower == death wish by puzzled · · Score: 5, Informative


        I want you slobbering wireless fanboys to listen carefully.

      Used towers are dangerous. You can get stitches and broken bones handling one 10' section of new Rohn 25 if you don't have competent help. A fall from 6' can be fatal, a 'lucky' fall from 20' is still going to leave you with a lifetime of disability. Towers are not a permanent fixture. Even with care they rust and they get metal fatigue if they're not properly braced or guyed. No professional will reuse tower components without a careful visual inspection and most will just say no unless its the smallest cross section segments like Rohn 25 (12" face) and they're not going back up in a large configuration.

        If you get it down and home with all of your toes and fingers intact you've still got to get it erected. A proper base is an art - see a prebankruptcy Rohn catalog for details. You need to calculate the wind load for the size of antenna you'll use and make sure you're using appropriate guying or bracing for the given load.

      The tallest building I've ever had to service was 634'. The tallest facility I've ever had to manage was 485'. The tallest tower I've ever personally climbed was 300'. The tallest I've ever specified myself and helped install was 60'. The tallest water tower I've ever worked was 135'. The most I've done in the last year was an install at 55' on a 185' Penrod 30. The only experience I don't have is dealing with cylindrical cellular type towers.

      Stating my experience should shut down the cantenna artists who just became tower recycling gurus by reading that article twice, but I'm at a loss as to how to say this so that I won't get someone saying "Aren't you special?". I am special in the scheme of Slashdot, because I talk about things I do rather than things I fantasize about doing.

        So much for my resolution to never, ever respond here again.

    --
    I am very easy to get along with, but I don't have time to waste being nice to people who are being stupid. -Theo
    1. Re:used tower == death wish by NoMaster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hear, hear. (Sorry, but I'm right with you on the "talk about things I do rather than things I fantasize about doing" thing.)

      But, did you read the article? The fsckin' tower itself is the safest bit of the whole project! It might be 30+ years old, exposed to the canadian weather, and been knocked around by trucks in the back yard of his father's workplace, but I'd trust it a damn sight more than I would his built-over-several-weeks-out-of-waste-concrete base, his made-from-old-leftover-gal-plate baseplate home welded to the base of the tower, or the 3 bolts and 6 nuts which hold it in midair (look carefully - the baseplate doesn't touch the concrete slab).

      Not to mention that the hole filled with water in 12 hours - he's got a serious problem with his soil stability right there.

      Personally, I'll wait for the story telling how the bolts broke, the welds cracked, the baseplate tore, the slab delaminated, or the whole thing floated out of the ground and fell over...

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    2. Re:used tower == death wish by shotgunefx · · Score: 1

      The bolts look kind of puny for it. But I'd be worried about lightning too.

      --

      -William Shatner can be neither created nor destroyed.
    3. Re:used tower == death wish by costas · · Score: 1

      I am no tower expert, but those bolts concerned me too: they are holding the entire weight of the tower *in shear*.

    4. Re:used tower == death wish by Coppit · · Score: 0, Troll
      So much for my resolution to never, ever respond here again.
      Well, as a 10^3 userid, let me tell you, 10^4 grasshopper, that you can go silent again. I can see no point to your condescending rant. (Unlike this condescending rant.)
    5. Re:used tower == death wish by woolio · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the guy hopes the tower will fall on the church when it goes...

      Whatever happens, I don't think it will be lucky...

    6. Re:used tower == death wish by puzzled · · Score: 1


          I would personally prefer to write simply and directly about areas in which I have knowledge, but experience with Slashdot has shown that for better or worse, a mob of uninformed anklebiters will get all over any informed poster with a bunch of nonsense comments. I open and close posts here with the flat of my hand and this practice limits my responses to people with an acceptable cluon flux around them and the occasional one line "Gee, aren't you special" response. This isn't perfect, but its a dramatic improvement over the way things used to be.

      --
      I am very easy to get along with, but I don't have time to waste being nice to people who are being stupid. -Theo
    7. Re:used tower == death wish by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      (look carefully - the baseplate doesn't touch the concrete slab)

      The underside of baseplates usually don't touch top of rough-poured concrete - that's what grout is for (after shimming).

    8. Re:used tower == death wish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a complete alternative to this dangerous tower thing, especially in places where the winds aren't too vicious...

      A couple years ago, slashdot was discussing those frisbee-shaped toy helicopters that go up and hover pretty stably. They only cost something like $40 dollars I think.

      Somebody suggested powering it with wires from the ground, and having it effectively become an antenna that can fly up there when you need it, hover as long as you want it, and then fly down again. Way cheaper than building a tower, and what can the zoning police say about you just playing with your cheap little RC-copter toy?

      I have friends in the ham radio community who could really use something like that, due to whiny neighbors & suburban zoning regimes. Unfortunately, I have not been able to find the discussion again or find who sells such things. And I am not well-funded enough to start such a company myself.

      I keep hoping somebody in the know will bring up the idea again...

  67. Blow Up The Church. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's community service.

  68. Get an amature radio (HAM) license. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Federal law protects the rights of HAMs to have reasonable accomodations (i.e. towers) to do what they do on their property. So long as what you plan to do is reasonable (structurally sound, etc.), you can tell the city, state, or HOA to bugger off.

    IANAL, but that's what I read in QST magazine when I held a HAM license. They even had something you could print out with the applicable regulations and how, being Federal, they trumped any stupid state or local restrictions, including HOA crap.

  69. What is exactly so dangerous? by ModernGeek · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Other than the whole lightning thing, what can really happen other than crushing yourself or breaking your arm by not having friends help you move it around? Sure, you can fall and stuff, but it seems like it shouldn't be that hard to erect and support a tower. I guess if you really were scared of the tower, you could just attach the antenna to the top of a tree that goes straight up.

    --
    Sig: I stole this sig.
    1. Re:What is exactly so dangerous? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 0

      >what can really happen other than crushing yourself

      Crushing your neighbors?

    2. Re:What is exactly so dangerous? by EmagGeek · · Score: 5, Informative

      Erecting a tower is serious business. You have to know what you are doing, and know it well. It's not a simple matter of throwing it up and climbing it. You WILL kill yourself if you do not know what you are doing. You MUST have your tower installation inspected, and in many cases, you must get a building permit to put one up and have a civil engineer sign off on your pad and guy wire plan. You must also have a registered PE inspect and/or tension your guy wires if you are to be able to obtain liability insurance on your tower. If you do not do these things, and something happens, YOU ARE SCREWED. Towers are heavy, fragile, and wimpy. If your tower falls and kills someone, you're looking at a manslaughter charge unless you can demonstrate due diligence.

      Do you remember kindergarten physics? Remember the machine called the lever? A 60-foot lever has a tremendous mechanical advantage. 20lbs of wind force at the top has 1200 lb-ft of torque at the bottom unless you are guyed properly. It's not uncommon to see wind forces of 100lbs or more during severe storms.

      Putting up a tower is no joke.

    3. Re:What is exactly so dangerous? by fm6 · · Score: 0

      Jeez dude, read before you react. He said what was dangerous: 60 fucking feet of unstable, rustable metal. Any piece of which can fall down and turn you into a quadriplegic. Or fall on your neighbor and put you in hock for the next century.

    4. Re:What is exactly so dangerous? by beast6228 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Erecting towers isn't all that hard, hell I've put up 40 foot towers by myself. and I've put up 100 foot towers with 12 element,40 foot boom antennas attached to them with less than 5 people. We never had any cranes or 14 thousand pounds of concrete either. A couple pizzas is all we wanted. I even painted the very same 100 foot tower 10 years later with nothing more than a tower belt and a two by four to slide in between the rungs to hold the paint can.

      But I will admit, you do need a quality tower if you are going over 100 feet. a wide base is very important. Alot of the older commercial towers were the same size from top to bottom, especially the ones over 500 feet tall. and they relied on guy wires for most of their support. Imagine climbing up a 500 foot tower? I don't think I would want to go that high, 100 foot is scary enough.

      Anyone remember this story about one of the tallest structures in the united states falling down and killing two? http://www.eham.net/articles/4033

      Of course, it was a 1,965 Foot Tower in Nebraska.

      --
      ~Later~
    5. Re:What is exactly so dangerous? by puzzled · · Score: 2, Informative

      The 1,965' tower fall was at KDUH in outstate Nebraska, about 400 miles west of me. As I recall the guys had been improperly tensioned for an HDTV antenna placement. The climbers were about a quarter mile above the ground when it all let go. One of them was 25 and his 18 year old girlfriend was on the ground near the base and had to simultaneously run for her life and watch her boyfriend die.

          KDUH. Almost seems like an Encyclopedia Dramatica article, doesn't it?

        Less famous is the second event in Nebraska that year - an injury to one of two climbers putting up a 'gate' - one of those triangular stand offs for antenna spacing. The gate caught during the lift phase, it was 'loaded' and stuck against the tower, and the guy who broke it free was rewarded with a nice, solid hit that shattered his right arm. Mmmm climbing one handed in agony ... my idea of a good day at work. This wasn't the final blow that put Media Integrators out of business but it did put them out of the tower construction game.

          Not long after that a skillful bulldozer operator in Glenwood, Iowa, half an hour south east of Omaha scored a confirmed kill, hitting the top guy wire for the 300' city/county tower, neatly snapping it in the middle. Most of the equipment on it survived the folding, then was destroyed when they cut it and let it fall; cranes cost and there were safety concerns - easy to load a guy with a tow vehicle and torch the base.

        Not long after that one of the 1,200' towers at Crown Point in Omaha came down during the night. Amazing it didn't damage any of the other three when it fell. The replacement is up and its quite strange to see three properly painted red and white towers and one new galvanized one.

        We've got a bit of a pool going here - will the next fall be the 80' Rohn 25 half a mile east of the I-80/I-480 interchange that is so corroded one of its legs has a inch and a half air gap between tower leg and base, or will we see the badly overloaded Metro Transit Authority tower directly south of that interchange come down with two inexperience climbers on it?

      --
      I am very easy to get along with, but I don't have time to waste being nice to people who are being stupid. -Theo
    6. Re:What is exactly so dangerous? by puzzled · · Score: 1



          This is Slashdot, cap'n, and I'm ahead of 99 and 44/100ths of posters when I respond before reading a Slashdotted article because I work in the area. I swore off ever reading Slashdot comments again about a month ago but this one was just too juicy to let pass. The whole place would be ever so much better if people who knew things posted and those who didn't either remained silent or posted well considered questions.

      --
      I am very easy to get along with, but I don't have time to waste being nice to people who are being stupid. -Theo
    7. Re:What is exactly so dangerous? by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Do you remember kindergarten physics?
      Hey, most people here got their physics from watching Star Trek. Which means their knowledge is pre-Newtonian.

      Anyway, education is not the issue here. It doesn't take a rocket scientist (or even a model rocket scientist) to understand that big heavy metal structures can fall down and hurt people. I myself thought the used tower concept was perfectly cool until you explained why it wasn't.

      The problem is that many folks just don't like to admit that they don't know what they don't know. That's a problem with almost every discussion on Slashdot. Not a lot you can do about it.

    8. Re:What is exactly so dangerous? by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      WEll, don't get me _too_ wrong. Used towers are okay to use, but you have to thoroughly inspect them and make sure that they are safe. Most people get rid of towers for logistical reasons, but there are those who get rid of towers that were taken down because they were unsafe.

      In today's litigious society, if your tower can, when laid flat on the ground from its mounting point, extend beyond your property line, you just have to ensure you can demonstrate due diligence, which is very expensive.

  70. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  71. Anything for porn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess this answers the question as to how far one guy will go to get some high quality porn.

  72. Seriously stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1. 60' is high enough that if you fall, you will probably die.
    2. Towers are not toys. 60' might not seem tall, don't climb it with out the right safety gear.
    3. If you don't know anything about the tower, don't climb it. It could fall. Even if your neighbor, the old ham, says it is safe when he climbed it 10 years ago.
    4. you are talking serious feedline loss at 2.4 GHz. I hope he put the AP up on top. If it breaks in the middle of winter. Are you really going to want to fix it?
    5. If you put the AP at the top, you have to get power to it. Running AC up a tower is unsafe and is probably a local code violation.

    Don't do this at home boys. Towers are serious business. If you don't know who Rohn is or don't know how to tension a guy wire, hire a professional.

  73. History Lesson by etzel · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just another example of how religion gets in the way of technology...

    --
    "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it."
  74. Re:Lightning use by saskboy · · Score: 1

    "More likely, he's hoping he can luck out and get super-powers next time there's a lightning storm."

    I didn't RTFA, but I'm guessing his name is Frankenstein?

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  75. Guy didn't get a very good deal by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    A few years back a friend scored a nice military crank up tower on ebay. When fully cranked out it was 50 feet high.

    It was a two man carry unit. Once you got it on site you unpacked 8 or so tubes from the carrier, stood the carrier upright, inserted tube 1, cranked it up, locked it, tube 2, etc.

    Fit nicely in his Explorer. I'd kill for a tower like that today.

    1. Re:Guy didn't get a very good deal by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      That sounds portable. And as such, it sounds like something that is designed to be regularly cranked up and down, and checked and maintained regularly as well. And maintained by a sharp military operation.

      It sounds neat, but not like something for the wifi crowd.

    2. Re:Guy didn't get a very good deal by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      And was this a permanent solution that can withstand wind, ice loading, rain, etc? Since it's crank up, I'm guessing it was designed for temporary use in good weather conditions.

      --
      AccountKiller
    3. Re:Guy didn't get a very good deal by kilodelta · · Score: 1

      Put it this way. We got to test in some major storms, both rain and snow. One critical thing is to properly attach guy-lines to the tower and then pound huge stakes into the ground to receive the lines.

      That got us through sustained winds up near the 40MPH zone. It's all about wind load and this thing was engineered to take it. Granted, the largest wind load area was a the top of the tower.

      Marvelous piece of engineering and for the price it was ideal.

      The drool factor was excellent - up until this point the local amateur radio club had been using extension ladders as portable towers. When they saw the tower it was like our god, the god fo RF geeks, had actually stepped down to meet us.

    4. Re:Guy didn't get a very good deal by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      It sounds pretty cool, I'm just skeptical that it's going to be a good permanent solution. Maybe it does happen to work well being up for 10 years+, but it doesn't sound like it was designed to be used for that long a time period.

      --
      AccountKiller
  76. From a wireless HSI installer... by kryptx · · Score: 1

    I've climbed several towers taller than this from desperate customers. One customer in particular is losing his line-of-sight due to trees, so he's planning to extend his tower even higher. I can tell you I won't be the one moving his antenna.

    --
    Mods: Do you disagree with me? Go ahead and mod me down. Meta-mods will sort it out. Good luck!
  77. oooooo by Atilla · · Score: 5, Informative

    we do this on a regular basis for customers with lots of foliage and who are desperate to get broadband. this is actually very common.

    we found that it's cheaper and safer to have someone (e.g your power company) plant a wooden pole. we've had customers that buried a 60 ft (and a couple of times 70-ft) wooden pole 10 feet in the ground, with some concrete around it, and they've never moved since. you can get a set of pegs to do about 3-4 poles for around 90 bucks, with a tool to drive them in. it helps if you know what you're doing and have some climbing experience, of course.

    we also have a couple of customers that have guyed and non-guyed masts and tri-poles up to 70 ft.... people will do strange shit for high speed porn.

    the worst part is having to do routine maintenance and realignments, just cause it's time consuming and wears you out.

    another neat tower design is the kind that "breaks over" close to the ground, and has a counterweight. you can fold it over, install your gear, and straighten it back up.

    --
    --- sig moved for great justice.
  78. Peaches dog food wine and IP address by laplace_man · · Score: 1

    Hmm tower..I was eating lots of peaches strawberrys lately to get my tin can waveguide antenna working but unfortunately this cans ware too short :)) My neigbour was then realy concerned about his dog not eating any of his food for two days (too wide).I finaly got a nice long can from a store with expensive wine inside. My signal was strong my wpa_cli finaly connected dhcp got the addres from router and roomate and I WARE DRUNK !!

    Maybe next time I'll just build a tower to get few dB more :))))

    1. Re:Peaches dog food wine and IP address by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      What kind of expensive wine comes in a can?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  79. Get professional advice if you ever do this by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 4, Informative

    There's a lot of damaging superstitions about lightning. If you're in a lightning-prone part of the country, try to get your information from someone who knows physics and electrical engineering. Your recommended solution should include a ground *field* surrounding the tower, low-inductance connections, attention to take-off angles, arrestors before the wiring goes into the house, and a fanatical campaign to eliminate potential ground loops. You know how you're supposed to keep your feet together if you're caught in the open during a lightning storm? If you have equipment grounded in different places, that's the same as moving your feet apart. Strke current trying to fight its way through sorta-conductive dirt may discover that your equipment is a shortcut.

    You can manage a direct strike: operators of really tall towers get hundreds per year. But it requires a lot of attention to detail and a complete understand of the physics. For an application like this I'd suggest a disposable AP at the tower and no wiring going into the house.

    1. Re:Get professional advice if you ever do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so you hop your way home in a storm?

    2. Re:Get professional advice if you ever do this by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Operators of really tall towers also replace lots of hardware due to lightning damage. If you pay thousands for the high end polyphaser lightning protection and do everything else right, you only lower your risk slightly. Polyphaser engineers themselves say their best gear will only give you a chance of saving your gear and will not in any way stop a direct strike that follows down the feedlines. 99.97% of all the strikes run down the tower that is better grounded than the feedlines. Typically you only get a few thousand volts running down the feedlines and that is easier to couple to ground safely.

      I dont care what anyone has told you. it is 100% impossible for you to shunt a full direct strike nothing on this planet can safely redirect several million volts at that many amps. I know, I had major discussions with experts in the field and worked in the tower world for over 15 years as both an amateur radio guy with a 200 foot tower on the tallest hill in the county and as a guy that helped with AM radio transmitters in highschool and have seen the best plans and gear fail completely due to a strike that overwhelmed the protection.

      I have seen 28 gague thin wire carry a lightning strike energy 500 feet to a home that then jumped an alarm panel and took out the phone system, magnetized all the window and door switches in the house and blew up the video distribution system. The wire was vaporized (copper inside the insulation. the insulation was untouched) for the first 200 feet, then was broken every 5 feet for the next 200 feet and then dropped down to a break (and burn hole) every 10 feet until it got in the house and after making several 90 degree turns that should have dealt with this. Oh the wire was buried as well so this was not a surface induction situation.

      We had lightning supression on the line, it was undamaged but allowed what we can tell is a hell of a voltage spike into the home. and it was not EMP induction as nothing else was harmed. not even the gear on the video distribution system for source video.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  80. got my 140 foot tower for free by EmagGeek · · Score: 2, Informative

    When I needed a tower for my 40-meter 4 element beam, I managed to search around local hamfests and other classifieds. I ran across a guy who was moving and wanted to just give away his 140-foot tower. Used towers are INCREDIBLY cheap due to the high costs of removal and transportation. If you are flexible, willing to rent a vehicle that can haul one, and expend the effort, you can get a tower for free almost any time.

  81. I's more like... by qzulla · · Score: 1

    So what does it take to build your own wireless reception tower?

            * Lots of determination
            * Lots of cement
            * Structure to pour the base (e.g. cement tubing, wooden cage, etc.)
            * Shovel
            * Blowtorch
            * Welding kit
            * Steel plate
            * Long, threaded steel rod (about 12 feet to make three smaller rods of four feet)
            * Paint
            * Buffering tools
            * Air-compressor
            * A Dad who does the bulk of the work

    qz

  82. Comcast/cox by wile_e_wonka · · Score: 1

    Next year a cable company will put high speed internet access in his town (as opposed to this guy's medium speed--but better than dialup), and I am imagining this guy very stubbornly refusing to subscribe to faster internet. I mean seriously, I'd be mad if I did all that work for nothing.

  83. Wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF is the big deal? .... We REGULARLY have customers build 90+ foot towers for 3.5GHz wireless ...

  84. This just in... by tresstatus · · Score: 1

    ... man builds 70 foot tower in his yard because some dick built a 60 foot tower between him and his ISPs transmitter.

    --
    stephen
  85. Why? by evilviper · · Score: 1

    I still don't understand WHY... Why a massive tower, instead of something fairly light and simple like a large flagpole? Or, if you're willing to wait, there are these things called TREES which get fairly high above ground.

    Personally, I prefer the option of "stepping a few few to the left" to get out of the shadow of the church, and running a few wires. This is a rural area, so that shouldn't be a problem. You can do the same thing wirelessly, also.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  86. 130 Foot Personal Tower - 802.11g @ 1.2 miles by amahler · · Score: 1

    I tackled a similar project in 2002 to connect me to my office 1.2 miles across the fields/woods/highway. I ended up at 130 feet and now run it at 54 mbit 802.11g after swapping out the gear recently. I've had a collection of captioned photos of the building process online for a few years covering everything from digging the original footers to erecting the tower. I tossed in a few updated shots this morning:

    http://sparhawk.sbc.edu/tower

    They are in chronological order with the newest stuff on the last page.

    Thought it might interest some folks with similar goals in mind. No, it wasn't cheap to do. In excess of $3,000 all told... but worth every penny, especially since it connects me to a DS3 on the other end. :) I hired professionals to erect it, but my uncle and I did the ground work including the pouring of 12,000 pounds of concrete for the six foot anchor rods. I'm tempted to put a PTZ camera on the top of it someday for fun.

    In a shed between the house and tower I've got the UPS equipment and a hub that transitions to fiber before entering the attic (the fiber helps decouple the outside gear from the inside gear electrically since the tower - despite being grounded - can act as a huge lighting rod).

    Neither DSL nor cable modems are available to me where I live. Besides, as the network admin for the campus where I work, I control my own access to a degree I'd never get commercially. Also means I'm never really "away" from the office (which cuts both ways). :)

  87. Normal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't find this unusual. We run a small WISP in North Dakota and Minnesota, and many of the farmers put up towers at the drop of a hat to get high speed. Some people are just desperate.
    -WIFIGUY

  88. I am at a COMPLETE loss by mnmn · · Score: 1

    I am at a complete loss as to why didnt he just pull a wire from a neighbor? Why does it have to be all vertical... entirely in his own space? Its spacially way too inefficient.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
    1. Re:I am at a COMPLETE loss by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Because people just don't talk to each other. I bet he never approached a neighbour who wasn't in the church's signal shadow to ask to put a repeater on their house for the exchange of perhaps setting up their internet access or similar. Even before I saw the replies by real engineers on this topic, I was wondering where his engineering study was and how those bolts are awfully skinny when he gets the next strong storm come past.

  89. This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is happening all over rural America. I helped a friend put up an 80' tower over a year ago to make a seven mile link for broadband.

  90. Yeah, but by bensafrickingenius · · Score: 1

    If your area doesn't have cable modem service, it probably doesn't have cable TV service. You sure no one's using these towers?

    --
    I am not left-handed, either!
  91. Hate Christ? Vote Democrat!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hate Christ? Vote Democrat!!!

  92. Logical fallacy by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

    Your post implies that hams aren't geeks.

  93. slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Warning: mysql_connect(): Too many connections in /storage/websites/short-media.com/global/db_mysql. php on line 75
    Database error: connect(localhost, vbulletin, $Password) failed.
    MySQL Error: ()
    Session halted.

  94. Cringely had the same problem and solved it. by barfomar · · Score: 1

    Bob Cringely had the same problem with a mountain and put up a passive repeater instead. http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20020207. html

  95. Actually he didn't build anything.... by beast6228 · · Score: 1

    Actually he didn't build anything at all....he errected a tower, not built it.

    Anyone can knock on someones door, ask them if they are using their tower and take it down. I've done that dozens of times for ham radio needs.

    --
    ~Later~
  96. glab its not my neighbor by bxbaser · · Score: 1

    Dont want to have that tower dropping on my house.
    the site is slashdoted but from what i could read it looked like he used the gudnuff engineering firm.

    Hmm do you think those welds will hold ?
    Luuks gud nuff ta me.
    Okke dokkee then.

  97. last phrase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "wood isn't going to cut it."

    probably unintentional as well

  98. Fryes Do it Yourself Project by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

    1000 feet of Cat-5 is $60-70. 3 hubs to boost the signal at 100 meter intervals would be another $100. I'm assuming he already has the wireless bridge. Stick the bridge on top of the church tower and run cable to your house. If the signal is good, you might not even need three hubs. Run the cable along fences, laundry lines, etc so the neighbors don't notice.

    1. Re:Fryes Do it Yourself Project by jaredmauch · · Score: 1
      30 meters of multimode (good to 2km) is can be found for roughly US$60. Add in some cheap PVC conduit ($1.50/10ft) and some pvc glue to place it in the ground/seal it waterproof (and away from any chewing/digging animals) and you can run whatever you want for some time. You can find gigabit (fiber) ethernet cards for roughly $45 online, so for around $200 (yes, kinda expensive) and some minor work you can run that cable over to your neighbors and not have something that is likely to get struck by lightning.

      plus you can change the cards on each side to upgrade when you want to go to something faster than gigabit. :)

      links:
      fiber 1000BaseSX ethernet various pvc conduit

  99. Exactly the same problem - Blocking CN Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have exactly the same problem with a three story church. The church is blocking the CN Tower completely. I'm trying to get satellite and OTA HDTV from the CN Tower. I understand this guys pain.

  100. Fiber by Kludge · · Score: 1

    You can have wiring from the tower into the house, just not metal wiring. Run some fiber optic cable underground into the house. Ethernet media converters are not too expensive.

  101. WDS setup by acariquara · · Score: 1

    Yes you could, and that would be fairly easy. It's called a "repeater" setup.

    Get two non-V5 WRT54Gs (V1-V3 WRT54GS would be best, but anyway) on eBay for around $50 each, 2 pairs of high-gain antennas (omni will do if your neighbour is across the street). Install the antennas (unscrew the original and screw in the replacements), go to http://www.dd-wrt.com/ get DD-WRT v23 final (or v23 SP1 Beta if you are feeling brave), flash your routers (get an adult to help you) and enable WDS (or lazy-WDS). There's a wiki if you get lost, or need more details, and a lovely forum if you still have issues.

    Cost: 2xUS$50 plus 2xUS$ 19 for the antennas, plus US$2 for beers = US$140.

    Note that WDS gives you half the bandwidth available for 802.11g, but it should be more than enough. If you need more bw, you can follow the above minitutorial and put one router @ regular access point/wireless router mode and the other in client-bridged mode, but then you would be limited to connecting to the four physical (wired) ports at the back of the router.

    --
    Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  102. Try installing Linux on it. by Mulletproof · · Score: 2

    No, I don't care that it's a tower.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  103. Dude! That is SO ME! Or should be.... by cobras2 · · Score: 1

    Well, my problem is that I'm out in the middle of nowhere, too far from anywhere for cable or DSL, but maddeningly, just close enough that I coukd probably get wireless... if only there weren't a few hills in the way.

    I have already seriously considered looking into getting some kind of tower set up, but time and money have gotten in the way as usual, so nothing has come of it yet...

    --
    Early bird may get the worm.. but the second mouse gets the cheese.
    1. Re:Dude! That is SO ME! Or should be.... by Danzigism · · Score: 1

      i hear ya dude.. my house actually has DSL.. however, when I go to the office in the middle of Bum Fuck, we have NOTHING.. i can see people across the highway that can get cable internet access!! But Comcast wants us to pay them $5,000 so they can dig under ground and lay cables to our little warehouse on the other side of the street.. the phone lines here are also very shoddy.. so shoddy, "ISDN-Anywhere!" isn't even available here.. We can get satellite but when I told my bosses how much it would cost in comparison to cable or DSL, they just laughed at me.. so for the past 4 years, as an ebay powerselling business, we've been on dialup.. listing just about 500 auctions a week, and keeping an Ebay Store inventory of around 700+ items all the time.. it sucks so bad when I have to submit all my listings in bulk, then upload the images for those items.. there's aboslutely nothing we can do here..

      --
      *plays the Apogee theme song music*
    2. Re:Dude! That is SO ME! Or should be.... by cobras2 · · Score: 1

      Wow.. and I thought it was bad having all 11 of my home computers (hey, there are 9 people in the family, honest, not all 11 computers are mine!) hooked up to the same dialup connection :)

      --
      Early bird may get the worm.. but the second mouse gets the cheese.
  104. only 50 ft? by v1 · · Score: 1

    Around here anyway, with the landscape hilly the way it is, there are TV antenna towers all over the place. Most of them are around 40ft tall and are made from some cheap "ribbon candy" towers, that are only meant to support a TV antenna. Many of these towers are even freestanding, although you often see them with a few cables teathering them to the house corners, which in most cases isn't helping with how loose the cables are. Many of these towers are only 2 or 3 sections, enough to get 8-10 ft above the roof with the antenna.

    There are a lot of old amateur radio operators in the area, easily spotted by the higher quality towers and sometimes very large antenna arrays. A few of the towers around here are 70ft or higher, and are guy-wired to buried anchors at the corners of their yard. There are still a couple monsters around 100ft tall in town.

    Most of these towers are not currently used. I'd estimate 70% of the radio and 85% of the TV antennas up are not being used. (mostly from amateur radio operators that are no longer active, people that have gotten cable TV, and people that bought the house with the tower already installed) Only maybe 1/3 of the owners are interested in getting rid of them though - some people don't want kids crawling around on their roofs kicking up shingles, and some just think they might use it again. But that still leaves a very large number of people willing to sell their towers. Many of them will give it "free for the taking" so long as you clean up and use some tar or other sealant on the anchor points to make sure they don't get roof leaks as a result of your extraction. They're usually just glad to get rid of the eyesore.

    The "good" towers (rohn for instance) last I checked were around $20/ft, so about $200/section if bought new. The top sections, with the end cap where you'd insert a mast for the antenna, are more common than you'd like to see - almost every tower has one and you can only use one yourself, so you usually end up stuck with one or two spare top sections you cannot use if you're trying for 3+ section tower, unless you cut them down a bit.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  105. Re:Hate Christ? Vote Democrat!!! by lowmagnet · · Score: 0, Troll

    Hate humanity? Vote Republican!

    --
    Heute die Welt, morgen das Sonnensystem!
  106. LIghtning dissipation by 6800 · · Score: 1
    All I can say about the bull crap part is that before I errected my tower we had hits close enough to my poll pig to trip the protector nearly each summer at least once.

    Since putting the tower in place about ten years ago, not once has the pig been hit. Only once has anything happened close enough to the tower to cause any damage of my equipment (lucky?). I do have each leg directly grounded with it's own #4 wire and 8 foot ground rod.

    Another ham down by the river where the storms rush by has his 200' tower hit quite frequently. I am in the middle of a mostly relatively flat area.

    My pet hypothosis is that my tower bleeds off enough of the static buildup rapidly enough that 'usually' it aids in lightning reduction in my immediate area. I do mean immediate cause two poll pigs up the street, they get hit at about half the previous frequency of mine. I have lived here 24 years.

    I have no doubt that a fast moving storm directly over me would show no mercy.

    1. Re:LIghtning dissipation by njh · · Score: 1

      How would you test your hypothesis?

  107. Aren't you special? by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    You're missing another kind of experience.

    Learning how to communicate with others without acting like an asshole.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  108. Kindergarten Physics? by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    Wow. Schools are very advanced now.

    Okay, I have to admit I'm baffled. Why do tower geeks here feel like they have to convince everyone how dangerous towers are? Do they want erecting towers to become the kind of job that attracts groupies, like firemen?

    With a simple spoon I can make a device (called a "hole") that can kill you without much fuss. With some twigs and leaves, I can make it so you can never see it coming. So why do tower enthusiasts act like towers are some kind of killing machine the likes of which have rarely been seen since the Great War?

    I have sharp objects in my kitchen that make these towers look like playground jungle gyms. Hell, a jungle gym can take you out without much fuss and we encourage kids to play on them!

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  109. Bad aesthetics because of no DSL! Pyrrhic victory. by aisnota · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrrhic_victory

    Ok, he one, he got broad band woohoo, but terrestrial
    solutions are more aesthetically pleasing. Small towns
    in Iowa of only 300 or so people are getting DSLAM's or
    have cable modem coverage.

    This is a case of making your town ugly for broadband.

    The only justification for a tower IMHO is ham radio and case closed.

    --
    http://www.aisnota.com/slashdot/ Welcome to Logic and the Future
  110. they look small to me too... by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    But holding the weight of the tower isn't unusual. For that matter, the weight of the tower isn't much. I have to say I'm going from what I remember before, because the article is slashdotted now. But I believe it is made up of aluminum sections with only slight cross bracing. A tower like this, it can't weigh much over 100 lbs.

    And go look at lighting standards (towers) in parking lots near you. Many of the smaller of these sit on the bolts on their bases. If you think of it, the weight of the tower is miniscule next to the forces of the wind on the top. It might even reduce the total force on a bolt being stretched (on the upwind side) by its own weight. It does add to the lee bolt (the one being compressed), but steel is pretty good under compression.

    Also, note since this tower is aluminum, "rust" isn't part of the issue. Although it can oxidize, aluminum when oxidizing makes a white coating for itself that inhibits further oxidization. I would have to imagine the biggest risk from the actualy reuse of the tower is metal fatigue, and even that's probably low.

    Now, as a confirmed non-tower expert, I want to say the way a tower like this is usually attached to the ground in my experience is you bury the bottom section directly in the concrete. It comes apart in sections about 6-7 feet long, so you don't have to work with the whole tower while setting it. the advantage of this type of attachment is there is no additional math to do. If you've built a 60-foot tower before, then a 54-foot tower with six feet buried in concrete has no new concentrated stress points and no connections that receive more stress than in the 54-foot tower, so you know it will work exactly the same. All you have to do is know the max height you can safely build and you're off and running.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  111. Google map of the 1km path the forklift took by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want to see the 1km path the forklift took on the road:

    START: I searched for the concrete company name painted on the tube picture in the article and found this address: 2145 Rang St-Antoine, Ste-Elisabeth, QC, Canada

    END: He said he rented part of the house to the postal company. So I searched on canada post for a post office in that same city (the closest to the concrete company): 2433 PRINCIPALE, Ste-Elisabeth, QC, Canada

    Gives this 1km path on a major PROVINCIAL ROAD on a forklift carrying a 14k pound concrete block!! LOL!!

    http://maps.google.com/maps?saddr=2145+Rang+St-Ant oine%2C+Ste-%C3%89lisabeth%2C+QC%2C+Canada+@46.094 260%2C-73.345539&daddr=2433+PRINCIPALE%2C+Ste-%C3% 89lisabeth%2C+QC%2C+Canada&f=li&output=js&hl=fr&dq =2145+Rang+St-Antoine%2C+Ste-%C3%89lisabeth%2C+QC% 2C+Canada&cid=

    PierreBus

  112. Photos of another tower install, but taller by deanpole · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My buddy posted photos of the 96 foot tower he installed.

    1. Re:Photos of another tower install, but taller by MmmDee · · Score: 1

      Nice job! The video was an extra nice touch.

      --
      No man's an island, unless he's had too much to drink and wets the bed.
  113. Re-er! by fm6 · · Score: 1
    no, wait, he's in Canada; make that 3.3 meters unless he's in Quebec in which case make it 3.3 metres
    The -re ending has nothing to do with French linguifascism. The word is "metre" in all English-speaking countries except the U.S. Americans changed all "-re" words to "-er" about a century ago, in the name of spelling reform. Other English-speaking countries only use "-er" when it makes sense in terms of word origins. Note that "metre" comes from the Greek word "metron".

    Incidentally, there's still a Centre Street in NYC.

  114. How is this something special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I put up 70 foot of rohn 25G to get high speed access at my place. He way overpaid for his tower sections, thats rediculous.... I picked up a used 110ft. tower for 200bucks. 10 full sections and a top section. I should have wrote a story about it maybe I could have been put on slashdot

  115. Re: Man Scouts? But I thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Huh!
    And I thought the only thing that Man Scouts were into was Boy Scouts!
    Oh wait! Maybe that was Catholic priests I was thinkin' of....

  116. Just for a laugh... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    This is what happens when you get it wrong. I actually knew a guy that lived near that.

    1. Re:Just for a laugh... by rspress · · Score: 1

      Yep, great page!

      Not a lot of people realize that just the tower sitting the with no wind and no ice still has a lot of stored energy in it. When my dad and I put our own towers in we may have gone a little overboard on the construction of the bases but they have withstood 100+MPH winds and micro bursts from the thunderstorms, even some near misses from funnel clouds. The micro bursts and tornados that have come close are a rare sight in California but our somewhat overloaded towers always stayed up. Mine is currently on the ground since I moved from the house it was installed at. The base is still there....it will be for long time to come.

  117. Nothing new here by CptPicard · · Score: 1

    Church blocking progress again, in a very concrete way this time.

    --
    I want to play Free Market with a drowning Libertarian.
  118. Major weak point at the welds by Animats · · Score: 1
    Yeah. Did you notice what actually holds up the tower? Three threaded rods pushed into wet cement. The only thing holding that tower against wind loading is the friction between the rod thread and the cement. He should have had a plate or two between the rods down in the cement. There's no rebar in there, either. He's depending on tensile strength in cement, usually a mistake.

    And those dinky welds... Remember, he cut off the base of the tower when he got it, and had to homebrew a new base. It looks like there's just one inch of weld (with rust!) holding each tower leg. And it's a weld on galvanized steel. You have to grind or burn off the galvanized zinc coating before welding, or you get a weld to the coating, which is like glueing to paint. The weld doesn't look good, either - the bead isn't even. Here's a welding tutorial. Look at their pictures of good and bad welds. Then compare the weld in the article. It's worse than any "bad weld" shown. A good weld is stronger than the material it attaches. Not this one.

    He's got plenty of cement base, and the tower itself is probably strong enough, but the connections between the two are far weaker than either. When it breaks, it's going to break at the weld between the tower leg and the metal gusset. Right where the rust shows through the paint.