Slashdot Mirror


Xbox 360 Backup Discs Bootable

An anonymous reader writes "The firmware of the Xbox 360 DVD drive has been hacked, allowing users to boot backups of games on the new Microsoft console. A group of hackers on the xboxhacker.net forum managed to trick the DVD firmware into reporting a recordable disc as an original Xbox 360 disc. This means that it will not allow booting of unsigned homebrew code (like Linux), as the signature check is not bypassed. This hack will just trick the Xbox 360 into thinking you inserted an original Xbox 360 disc, so it'll only boot unedited executables. A video has been released, the hack has not been released to the public (because it will be mainly used for piracy), but all the research of the last few months is publicly viewable."

287 comments

  1. "we don't want to support piracy" by Quick+Sick+Nick · · Score: 5, Funny

    yeah, and I read playboy for the articles.

    1. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I read Playboy mainly for the page numbers, and the index. I mainly enjoy looking up a random page in the index, and then finding it in the magazine by binary search. I've written a program in Perl that helps me train; I type in the number of pages, and then it selects a random page for me, following a gaussian distribution (I don't want to have to find the index! lol!) and then I navigate to it. After a few years practice, I've got down to an average of less than two seconds for any given page number. I've got my girlfriend doing it now as well, we can sometimes spend entire evenings sitting down with my Linux box, seeing who can get to page 58 first! Its absolutely fantastic.

    2. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, Playboy articles are pretty good, providing good analysis of all the hot topics, like global warming, politics, religion, law, freedom, etc., etc.

    3. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      HAHA!

      Coffee, meet screen.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    4. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by ajamer · · Score: 1
      yeah, and I read playboy for the articles.
      and I modded my Xbox to get the babes
    5. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by linguizic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wait a minute, playboy has articles?

      --
      Does this sig remind you of Agatha Christie?
    6. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you must be gay if all you can talk about is the articles.

    7. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by msobkow · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Hate to say it, but from what I've heard, the XBox 360 is notorious for destroying disks. Unless the manufacturers are going to ship replacement disks, or Microsoft is going to replace console and damaged disks, I don't see that people have a choice but to burn images and leave the original safe.

      Of course some of those dups will probably end up with neighbours, friends, or as posted ISOs.

      What I find interesting is that it's yet another case of a "perfect" protection being broken. No matter how good the lock, a professional thief (or curious old-school hacker) will get past it. All locks ever do is keep out people who respect locks.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    8. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by NeMon'ess · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I thought that was just when users moved or tilted the 360 when it was powered up. If they'd wait until the disc wasn't spinning there wouldn't be a problem. Anyone smart enough to understand this doesn't get to use this as an excuse to backup their games.

    9. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by rolfwind · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How about Fair Use? Weren't music cassete back ups declared legal in a court of law in the 80's? Is that a good enough "excuse" for you?

      Why in the world is a backup considered piracy? I have all my cds/movies on my harddrive precisely because I don't want to damage the discs and therefore have to buy the same crap again. It's the content industry that wants their products to have the advantages of both a physical medial and pure license, but without the downside of either.

    10. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by Pneuma+ROCKS · · Score: 1

      And they're "Interesting", apparently. I didn't know the thing had words.

      --
      Favorite quote: "
    11. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You are winner of Slashdot!
      This website can now close down.

    12. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      What I find interesting is that it's yet another case of a "perfect" protection being broken. No matter how good the lock, a professional thief (or curious old-school hacker) will get past it. All locks ever do is keep out people who respect locks.
      AFAIK, nobody has managed to backup and burn GameCube discs.

      You can stream backups from your PC to your GC over a LAN.
      So while it's a functional hack, it isn't nearly as... simple.

      I wonder why they ignored the only schema so far that has kept the modders from ripping and burning backup discs.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    13. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by wheresdrew · · Score: 3, Informative
      "AFAIK, nobody has managed to backup and burn GameCube discs."

      Gamecube games can be backed up and burned with very little trouble. Stick in a modchip and buy a custom case to allow the Cube to hold full-sized DVDRs and you're all set.

    14. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by Retroneous · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, Playboy is great. It also shows pictures of ladies with their tits out.

    15. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by Klanglor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      actualy my brother told me that he downloaded his copy of eclipse on the playboy mirror.

    16. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or have a hot wife/girlfriend who totally outdoes all so called "babes".
      Like mine.

    17. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      "Anyone smart enough to understand this doesn't get to use this as an excuse to backup their games."

    18. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the topic is "NeMon'ess got owned." Now zip it.

    19. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by chicagotypewriter · · Score: 1

      now people can say "i only go to playboy.com to find the mirrors" instead of "i only go to playboy.com to read the online articles."

    20. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Are you trying to make a point? If you understand it's bad to move the console while it's spinning the disc, then you don't get to use ring-scratched discs as an excuse to backup.

      Fair Use is another reason, but not the topic I originally replied to.

    21. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just because you're smart enough to know better (and I'm not saying you are) doesn't mean that someone else who might have physical access to your game console is also. Therefore, stupidity is not the only valid excuse (let alone the fact that you don't need an "excuse" for Fair Use anyway)!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    22. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm, hate to shatter your 'Stick it to The Man(TM)' dreams, but no-one at Microsoft said the XBox 360 protection would be unbreakable. They made it very clear that they knew the protection would eventually be broken, and that all they could do was make it as difficult as possible.

      I know you want to view this as a glorious victory of hackers fighting for your freedom against the big eeeeeevil coporations, but it isn't. It took them four fucking months of nerdiness, while MS made countless millions, and their work is all in the name of software piracy (come now, dont kid yourself otherwise). If a theif broke into your house by 'hacking' the locks on your door, would you still be cumming in your pants about the anarchy of it all? No, I don't think so. Grow the fuck up, you pathetic cunt.

    23. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by prionic6 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Instead of the custom case you can also use mini-dvd-r.

    24. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wasn't there something on Slashdot recently about someone getting mini-DVDRs (that would fit in an unmodified GameCube case) to work?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    25. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      Heh, I just wanted to correct the original poster for blowing the xbox 360 situation out of proportion and a bunch of people miss my point. Not really surprised though with /. having so many readers.

    26. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, no he's not, he's lying! He said he had a girlfriend!

      *phew* Close call there. We almost had to close down slashdot!

    27. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      or have a hot wife/girlfriend who totally outdoes all so called "babes". Like mine.
      Give it a few years, and you'll recall the saying that for every attractive woman there's some guy who's sick of putting up with her shit.
    28. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by sirwired · · Score: 1

      And of course, the best way to start a binary search is the center(fold).

      SirWired

    29. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by whmac33 · · Score: 1

      I use playboy.com for my CPAN mirror :)

    30. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by mdw2 · · Score: 1

      That doesn't quite fit the definition of "very little trouble"

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    31. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by Psiven · · Score: 0

      That was the limitation for a while. It's been possible to rip and burn GCN ISOs for about 2 years now.

      http://modthatcube.pxn-os.org/

    32. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by dascandy · · Score: 1

      > Playboy articles are pretty good, providing good analysis of all the hot topics

      And displaying detailed images of the hot topics as well...

    33. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by wheresdrew · · Score: 1
      Different definitions for different people.

      I've taken apart every console and computer I've ever owned - portable, television, desktop or laptop. A bit of solder and putting the guts in a new case isn't troublesome at all. Hell, part of the reason for doing stuff like this is to see if you can do it.

      Can I pull it off or will I toast my system? Tune in to find out! ^.^

      (For the record, I've never ruined a computer or game system.)

    34. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by mkro · · Score: 1

      That didn't work on your mother, and it will certainly not work on us.

      --
      I shall go and tell the indestructible man that someone plans to murder him.
    35. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by Zazzalicious · · Score: 1
      , while MS made countless millions

      errr.. lost countless millions I believe....

    36. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by Jaruzel · · Score: 1

      'Fair Use' no longer exists in modern digital copyright.

      Under current legistration, all your cassettes are now illegal, you must bury them in landfill immediately. ;)

      -Jar.

      --
      Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
    37. Re:"we don't want to support piracy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying you should go for "the ugly types" in order to have a durable and enjoyable relationship?
      I'm happy in my relationship, thank you.

  2. firmware check on new games? by Brit_in_the_USA · · Score: 3, Interesting

    how long until a game is released that checksums the DVD firmware and "updates it" to soemthing more secure?

    ( + reporting to MS Live if you have a hacked verison and cancelling your account? ala Blizzard?)

    1. Re:firmware check on new games? by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 1

      How long until they hackers then change the checksums or add the obvious GOTO 30 line?

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
    2. Re:firmware check on new games? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

      How long until they hackers then change the checksums or add the obvious GOTO 30 line?

      Yes, but Microsoft is cunning you see, they number their program lines one by one instead of 10 by 10, so you can't insert a GOTO line. And RENUM is disabled. Clever I tell you!

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    3. Re:firmware check on new games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "how long until a game is released that checksums the DVD firmware and "updates it" to soemthing more secure?"

      That was never much of a problem with an original soft modded Xbox and I doubt that it'll be much of a concern on the 360 either. Especially, once soft mods become more advanced. Xbox live can certainly pose a problem for novices who have had there Xbox soft modded, but even that is fairly trivial to work around. Also, the vast majority of Xbox users aren't interested in Xbox live and have never used or even tried it. Only a very small percentage of Xbox users (something under 5%) even try Xbox live. I know a ton of people with original Xboxes and I've never even seen Xbox live and have no interest in it what so ever.

    4. Re:firmware check on new games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The XBox360 is marketed almost entirely around XBox Live. The entire system has been totally revamped (including a free, less feature-full version that anyone can, and should connect to). The new XBox live is going to be a lot different than the old.

    5. Re:firmware check on new games? by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 1

      There's no reason for Microsoft to do that. If a game can checksum the DVD through a game and push down a reset, then all Microsoft needs to do is push down a kernel update to your box which will force-update the DVD firmware whenever you turn on the box (or even whenever you insert a DVD, to prevent the obvious 'turn the box on, throw a switch to replace the firmware, and go from there' hack.)

    6. Re:firmware check on new games? by hazem · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Isn't that just a really bad "security" model... that any old game you put in your system has the ability to re-write the firmware? Isn't that just asking for trouble?

    7. Re:firmware check on new games? by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Um... GOTO 3? Not as clever as you thought :p

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    8. Re:firmware check on new games? by Kagura · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but what is the line number that GOTO 3 belongs on? I think I know what the whooshing noise you just heard was, by the way. :)

    9. Re:firmware check on new games? by DrSpotter · · Score: 1

      It would be in an open format (such as running software on your PC that you've just download from the 'net), but the only software you can buy for this and other consoles has to come through the manufacturer before it is signed/put on an 'original' disc that the console will allow booting from. Given this process there shouldn't be any scope for such problems as the publishers themselves are, presumably, considered trustworthy by the console manufacturers.

      Only if you can disable the protection to let you run "backup" games that may not have come through the official publishing route would you be exposing your system to those kind of problems, and I imagine the console manufacturer wouldn't have a great deal of sympathy for you in such circumstances...

      --
      Never put off until tomorrow what you can put off until the day after.
    10. Re:firmware check on new games? by hazem · · Score: 1

      Given this process there shouldn't be any scope for such problems as the publishers themselves are, presumably, considered trustworthy by the console manufacturers.

      You mean like Sony can be trusted to make CDs that won't compromise people's computers? I'm glad these companies are so trustworthy because otherwise, we'd have a lot to worry about.

    11. Re:firmware check on new games? by noidentity · · Score: 1

      That's pretty disappointing. One thing that I've always seen as an advantage of consoles is their true insert-and-play functionality and invulnerability to software corruption (besides loss of saved games). Now that they contain flash memory, they are presumably susceptible to the same bullshit as on the mainstream PC operating system. What's to stop companies from putting monitor-ware into the BIOS and having it phone home with your play data?

      Not that I've bothered even playing any consoles after the Playstation and Nintendo 64.

    12. Re:firmware check on new games? by schon · · Score: 1
      Isn't that just a really bad "security" model.
      Given this process there shouldn't be any scope for such problems as the publishers themselves are, presumably, considered trustworthy by the console manufacturers.

      Umm, that doesn't really answer his question.
    13. Re:firmware check on new games? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      The first line of code that you want skipped, obviously!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    14. Re:firmware check on new games? by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      So, the solution for MS hating black hats is to write a virus that searches machines for XBox360 code, and inserts a virus into the code that will overwrite the 360 Bios. The code that is written waits for say, 12 months, and then turns the XBox into a brick. I have personally seen serveral companies distribute software with virus on them. I would bet that given the current count of XBox360 viruses being 0, that they don't bother virus scanning the software before sending it to production.

    15. Re:firmware check on new games? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      What's to stop companies from putting monitor-ware into the BIOS and having it phone home with your play data?

      Don't give it a connection to the outside world?

      I mean, sure, it does prevent you from being told that some 14-year-old twerp fucked your mom last night 27 times a day, but hey, these are the prices we pay for security.

    16. Re:firmware check on new games? by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      Would be modifiers could simply set the chip that holds the firmware into write protect mode. Just about every chip of that nature I know of has a hardware switch to write protect/write enable. If you threw that switch after you re-flashed the firmware the Xbox could try all it wanted and never re-flash the firmware.

      As for the Xbox Live bannings, It will probably work just like the Xbox 1, in that they accounts will never be banned but the CONSOLE is. That is each console has an eprom that contains some unique data. If Xbox Live detects that it's modded (check sum on the bios) it deletes all the data on the eprom and re-flashes it with some generic "don't let the console on Xbox live" data.

      Most people hacking these things wont be on Xbox Live though...

    17. Re:firmware check on new games? by yakumo.unr · · Score: 1

      They're allready seeing enough problems as it is with peoples consoles being trashed during firmware updates over live...

      anyway, wouldn't pirates just add a modded boot sector to their disks that did the opposite again?

      hmm, though admitedly this would be putting quite some strain on the chip, constantly reflashing it, it wouldn't bother MS as it would just be trashing backup users machines.

  3. (because it will be mainly used for piracy) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    That's got to be the dumbest thing I have heard all week.

    1. Re:(because it will be mainly used for piracy) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's got to be the dumbest thing I have heard all week.
      Huh. Bush must not be making many public speeches lately...
  4. better video by Quick+Sick+Nick · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you don't want to wait 30 seconds to download the video, stream it here:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyZQ4k7Bi-8

    1. Re:better video by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 1

      Dumb question: has anyone actually replicated this result? All I've seen is something which could just as easily be a recorded DVD movie...

    2. Re:better video by mzwaterski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I thought of another way to fake this. Just use the rear inputs on the television hooked up to another xbox 360 with the real game in it. That'd be much easier than making a fake video.

  5. hmmmmm by fftl4life · · Score: 1

    well, microsoft definatly should have seen that coming, especially with how advanced dvd burners are, and how much storage the dvds have, i am surprised no one fugured it out sooner. good job to the ones who did that, cheers

    --
    ~FFTL4LIFE~
    1. Re:hmmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they did figure it was going to happen, all through out they have been saying that they knew it would get hacked by they were trying to reduce the legitimate reasons for hacking it (read: Xbox Media Center) also they were attempting to make live good enough that it wasn't worth the trade offs.

    2. Re:hmmmmm by oedneil · · Score: 0

      What does the "storage" of a DVD have to do with this?

    3. Re:hmmmmm by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 1

      Well, I can't really speak for the OP but the old Dreamcast used discs that held more than a standard CD. This created one more hurdle to pirate games on the Dreamcast. Of course, it wasn't a huge enough hurdle because piracy on the Dreamcast was/is rampant. Theoretically, if Xbox 360 games took up more space than a standard DVD (DL?) then it could make piracy a bit harder for the ordinary user. That's just my guess of what he meant, though. I don't know.

  6. Microsoft will.... by madnuke · · Score: 1

    Patch this as soon as possible otherwise they will not make money, and why do all the Xbox 360 hacking videos have the top of the console taken off, I'm still not fully convinced of the video seeing as we can't see the back of the tv.

    1. Re:Microsoft will.... by InsideTheAsylum · · Score: 1

      That's what I was thinking, but they had the A/V cable neatly coiled in front of the TV..

    2. Re:Microsoft will.... by madnuke · · Score: 1

      Could be another Xbox 360 plugged into the back?

    3. Re:Microsoft will.... by gabebear · · Score: 1

      If this video is real there isn't really any easy "patch" Microsoft can put out. If the part of the firmware that is in charge of downloading/uploading itself was also modified then I don't see how they could ever detect this hack without reulting to draconian means like putting a unique key on each copy of each disk sold and then forcing people to register their discs online.

    4. Re:Microsoft will.... by Rickler · · Score: 1

      The RCA cables are plugd right into the front... I'm skeptical because the DVD has a white top; would be more believable with a mirror sided DVD.

      --

      The human race is artificial intelligence created using object orientated programming.
    5. Re:Microsoft will.... by baadger · · Score: 1

      Excellent, they could call it Product Activation..this'll screw up them pirates real good!

    6. Re:Microsoft will.... by elmuhfuh · · Score: 0

      finally someone with a clue. youre exactly right. they arent going to be able to fix this easily. nor, will they be able to detect it. for those of you skeptical, this guy did the same thing with the original xbox a few months ago. white top? whats wrong with the purple bottom. hackers only use white top printable g04 media. RTFHM.

    7. Re:Microsoft will.... by frieko · · Score: 1

      Xboxhacker.net and xbox-scene.com are known sources with a solid track record going back to the beginning of XBOX. This is legit.

    8. Re:Microsoft will.... by gabebear · · Score: 1

      Product Activation is totally unheard of in console gaming, and would be impossible to defeat until someone finds a way to either sign executables, or execute unsigned code on the 360.

      I think people are used enough to product activation for this to work... the only problem I see is that it would tie a disc to a certain 360. Microsoft could provide a way to disassociate a disc with a given 360, but game rentals and used game sales would be problematic.

      Microsoft could provide special time-limited activations for rental discs, so that if you copy the game you can still only play it for a couple days. Microsoft could charge a butt-load for these special discs and make extra cash.

      Used game sales would just be difficult... every game sold back would have to checked that it was disassociated before a store could buy it. I doubt many retailers would buy used 360 games anymore. I think this would be seen as a positove thing to Microsoft and most game studios.

      If you wanted to play the game at a friends you would either have to disassociate it before you left, or maybe just login with your gamertag on their 360. Similar to the way downloaded games work now.

  7. Forget Piracy. Solution For Disc Scratching Mess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    No matter how much some people try to blame the problem on user error, the 360 has a massive problem scratching disc. And no it is not because 'some idiot moved the machine while playing'.

    The 360 will scratch every disc you put in it, the only question is how badly and how long before it completely trashes the disc for good. Being able to back up and never have to put my original games in the machine will be a help with this hardware mess Microsoft has on their hands.

  8. Mainly used? by Stiletto · · Score: 0


    They're not releasing it because it would be mainly used for piracy??? Hey, it's their software, and they can do what they want with it, but what a lame excuse! That's like Smith & Wesson not releasing their latest gun because "it would be mainly used for killing".

    1. Re:Mainly used? by The+Lerneaen+Hydra · · Score: 1

      I would expect that they said this to try to stop the immediate actions of Microsoft, who are probably not very pleased with this. I would believe that one of the people that have developed this hack will discreetly leak it to some torrent site, after which it will spread like wildfire.

    2. Re:Mainly used? by blanktek · · Score: 1

      If Smith and Wesson didn't release they're gun to the public because it would mainly be used for killing, and it was fully automatic, night vision, etc. then it probably is used for killing.

    3. Re:Mainly used? by Phil+Wilkins · · Score: 2, Informative

      The nature of the hack is that it masks a DVD-R as a factory pressed DVD. So all it lets you do, is boot 100% copies of existing titles. To boot homebrew, or imports, you'd need to crack the digital signature, or hack the main firmware, which hasn't happened. So there'll probably be pretty good piracy / 'backup' mod-chips available soon, but no homebrew yet.

    4. Re:Mainly used? by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      Depending on who you ask, copyright infringement is a much more serious crime than murder...

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    5. Re:Mainly used? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That's like Smith & Wesson not releasing their latest gun because "it would be mainly used for killing".

      Well, to be fair, killing is not illegal per se. I don't know about self defense (manslaughter?), but killing enemy combatants in a war and hunting animals are very often legal.

      IANAL, but I think just releasing this hack could be illegal by itself under the DMCA.

    6. Re:Mainly used? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because only fully automatic guns with night vision are used for killing?

      oh, and they're,there and their are not interchangeable.

    7. Re:Mainly used? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Can you imagine what a great world it would be if that kind of thing happened? If there were no guns, because everyone refused to make them?

      I don't think it's a particularly relevant point to this discussion, copyright infringement is in a different league to killing...

      (hmm, now I'm waiting for RIAA propaganda that "music sharing is murder!" if anything would convince mt to download N'sync that would be it...)

    8. Re:Mainly used? by Aneurysm9 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Well, to be fair, killing is not illegal per se.

      Neither is creating a backup copy of software you have purchased, nor is utilising that backup copy. As for the DMCA, there is an explicit exception for reverse engineering for interoperability that does not limit it to interoperability of software with other systems. It could just as easily be read to allow modification for interoperability with other software.

      --
      There was Cowboy Neal at the wheel of a bus to never-ever land.
    9. Re:Mainly used? by dead+sun · · Score: 1

      Why? Then we'd just kill each other with bows, swords, knifes, clubs, and pretty much any instrument that can be fashioned into a weapon. Clearly history is full of killing before guns were created. Our murderousness is by no means the fault of a gun or any other inanimate object. The removal of these objects from society isn't going to make it a better place. Even if we could remove all potential weapons we'd still just resort to using fists.

      If anything, guns are a boon to society, as they are an equalizer. With guns, it isn't just the strong that can kill, but also the meek. As such, they can act as a deterrent, as even the frail looking old lady could be packing lethal firepower.

      Now, if you're arguing that the world would be a great place if everybody refused to make or use anything as a weapon, that's another thing. But then all it takes is a single person to ruin that and everybody else is at a disadvantage. I think we're probably better off just having powerful deterrents, even if it isn't as dreamy as world peace and love.

      --
      If not now, when?
    10. Re:Mainly used? by tony1343 · · Score: 1

      Killing in self-defense for the most part is legal (i.e. it's not just mitigated to manslaughter, you get completely off).

      In America, you can almost always stand your ground and fight back against an attacker. However, you can only kill in self-defense if the attacker threatens serious bodily harm or death. In your home, you will most likely get off even if he is threatening serious bodily harm.

      I believe in a few states though and England, you are required to flee from the attacker if able to so safely. Therefore, in those places your ability kill in self-defense is very limited. America has for the most part rejected such a doctrine. Many American judges throughout history have even gone so far as to call those who flee "cowards" and have stated that it is the right of every human being to "stand his ground."

    11. Re:Mainly used? by 1ucius · · Score: 1
      I'd actually read it as limited to interoperability with other software.
      1) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a)(1)(A), a person who has lawfully obtained the right to use a copy of a computer program may circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a particular portion of that program for the sole purpose of identifying and analyzing those elements of the program that are necessary to achieve interoperability of an independently created computer program with other programs , and that have not previously been readily available to the person engaging in the circumvention, to the extent any such acts of identification and analysis do not constitute infringement under this title.
      Doesn't really sound like they qualify for this exception, though.
    12. Re:Mainly used? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Then we'd just kill each other with bows, swords, knifes, clubs, and pretty much any instrument that can be fashioned into a weapon. Clearly history is full of killing before guns were created. Our murderousness is by no means the fault of a gun or any other inanimate object. The removal of these objects from society isn't going to make it a better place. Even if we could remove all potential weapons we'd still just resort to using fists.

      If anything, guns are a boon to society, as they are an equalizer. With guns, it isn't just the strong that can kill, but also the meek. As such, they can act as a deterrent, as even the frail looking old lady could be packing lethal firepower.

      Now, if you're arguing that the world would be a great place if everybody refused to make or use anything as a weapon, that's another thing. But then all it takes is a single person to ruin that and everybody else is at a disadvantage. I think we're probably better off just having powerful deterrents, even if it isn't as dreamy as world peace and love.

      Well, in most Eurpoean countries, having a gun is very difficult.
      Because POLICE controls, or tries to control the illegal weapons.
      So it's not just a people to ruin, it's a people that hide himself, and that if he kills several times, will be caught!

      USA is certanly the "civilized" country where more people get killed by gun fires.

      Coincidence?

    13. Re:Mainly used? by Deadguy2322 · · Score: 0

      As the mighty Kang once said, "Run! He has a board with a nail through it!!!"

      --
      Check out my foes list to see who is so retarded that they can't use the signature line!!!
    14. Re:Mainly used? by Slashcrap · · Score: 1

      So there'll probably be pretty good piracy / 'backup' mod-chips available soon, but no homebrew yet.

      Oh, I don't know about that. Do you think it would even be worth anyone making one if it only allowed you to play pirated games? It's hard to see how they could hope to turn a profit if they couldn't sell it to all those people that just want to run Linux and Gameboy emulators on their 360. It's just economies of scale.

    15. Re:Mainly used? by Aneurysm9 · · Score: 1
      You're right, but remember that under section 101 "computer program" is so broadly defined that even a data file can be considered a computer program because it "is a set of statements or instructions to be used directly or indirectly in a computer in order to bring about a certain result," i.e., displaying an image on a screen in the case of a JPEG file. The ultimate goal of this project is to allow homebrew software on the XB360, or "to achieve interoperability of [] independently created computer program[s] with" the XB360 firmware and OS.

      Further, 17 USC 512(c)(1) provides that: "Nothing in this section shall affect rights, remedies, limitations, or defenses to copyright infringement, including fair use, under this title." Combine that with 17 USC 117(a), which reads:

      (a) Making of Additional Copy or Adaptation by Owner of Copy.-- Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106, it is not an infringement for the owner of a copy of a computer program to make or authorize the making of another copy or adaptation of that computer program provided: (1) that such a new copy or adaptation is created as an essential step in the utilization of the computer program in conjunction with a machine and that it is used in no other manner, or (2) that such new copy or adaptation is for archival purposes only and that all archival copies are destroyed in the event that continued possession of the computer program should cease to be rightful.
      and, I at least, come to the conclusion that 512 cannot prevent you from making and using a backup copy. You have the right to the backup copy. You have the right to use the any copy if it is "an essential step," as it would be if you had a backup and your original was damaged. Since you have that right under Title 17 and section 512 explicitly does not affect other rights under that Title, section 512 cannot be used to prevent you from modifying access control devices to allow the use of legitimate backups.
      --
      There was Cowboy Neal at the wheel of a bus to never-ever land.
    16. Re:Mainly used? by Aneurysm9 · · Score: 1

      akkk! %s/512/1201/g

      --
      There was Cowboy Neal at the wheel of a bus to never-ever land.
    17. Re:Mainly used? by wes_55 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I can see it now A car pulls up, the windows roll down the bows and arrows come out. But do you seriously think it makes the world a better or saver place if everybody has access to a gun?

    18. Re:Mainly used? by dead+sun · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I can see it now A car pulls up, the windows roll down the bows and arrows come out.

      Sure, why not? A crossbow could easily be used for such short range combat, is relatively compact, and taking up a space no larger than a rifle can easily launch an arrow at speeds in excess of 300 feet per second. It doesn't fire as fast, but if you're a sure shot or have a couple people at it then it doesn't matter so much.

      Or, if you prefer, a van with a group of thugs just rolls up, the thugs jump out, rip somebody from their car and beat them bloody. You think the gangs of the world are just going to pack it in because there aren't any means of killing as convenient as a gun?

      But do you seriously think it makes the world a better or saver place if everybody has access to a gun?

      Yes. It isn't that difficult for criminals to procure guns. It's even easier for a physically strong person to turn any old item, like a baseball bat, into a weapon. A law against guns merely means somebody who commits a crime with one has committed two crimes. That isn't prevention. It makes nobody safer. The deed is done.

      It also means denying an object that would level the playing field to the average Joe who's being threatened by the burly punk with the bat. I think the world would be safer (perhaps not for violent criminals) if everybody was taught how to properly handle, care for, and use a gun, self defense laws were more sane, and more people carried. Perhaps then crime perpetrated by those except for the truly desperate would fall when every person on the street has the potential to return lethal fire.

      I'm not saying anybody should desire to use their guns. Part of being responsible with a gun is not using it unless you are absolutely forced to. The last thing a person should want to do is to unleash lethal firepower. But to ban something so useful on account of the actions of people who just use whatever weapon is most convenient isn't going to stop those people.

      --
      If not now, when?
    19. Re:Mainly used? by Phisbut · · Score: 1
      Why? Then we'd just kill each other with bows, swords, knifes, clubs, and pretty much any instrument that can be fashioned into a weapon. Clearly history is full of killing before guns were created. Our murderousness is by no means the fault of a gun or any other inanimate object.

      Even though all those pre-firearms weapons can be used for killing people, they are all much safer to "use", as one can hardly accidentally kill someone with them.

      - That's how it happened officer... I was cleaning my bow, and I didn't know there was an arrow on the string, and then the bow fired by itself...
      - That's how it happened officer... I was carrying my sword while I thought the safety was on, but then when I dropped it on the floor, it bounced all the way across the room to go hit the man who was standing there...
      - Thats' how it happened officer... My son was playing in the basement and found this club that I keep in a drawer. He wanted to show it to his friend, but being only 8, he didn't know how to properly handle a club, and then he accidentally clubbed his friend to death...

      Even if we could remove all potential weapons we'd still just resort to using fists.

      It happens. Some kid gets ridiculed, other kids laugh at him, call him names, etc. The kid gets mad, uses his fists and beats up the other kids. Teachers come in, they stop the fight, results in a couple of kids with bruises. Or, if that kid has access to a gun (because, I don't know... he lives in a country where people feel they have a god-given right to own a gun), he takes the gun to school and then fires at kids. Results in 14 dead and 24 wounded, welcome to Columbine.

      Guns are not the only factor involved in the killing of people, but they are a facilitator. Face it, guns help kill people.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    20. Re:Mainly used? by dead+sun · · Score: 1

      Even though all those pre-firearms weapons can be used for killing people, they are all much safer to "use", as one can hardly accidentally kill someone with them.

      Three words, proper gun safety. When people are taught properly and know well enough to fear and respect the gun as a weapon then there aren't so many problems. When people get sloppy and forget their gun is loaded or let their eight year old play with a loaded, unlocked gun then you get trouble. If you can't observe proper gun safety you have no business owning a gun. There are many people who have no trouble whatsoever owning and maintaining their guns safely.

      Further, it isn't like guns are the only things that cause accidents or injury. In third grade one of my better friends took a baseball bat to the head after accidentally walking up behind somebody taking practice swings. He was hospitalized for a week. The doctors said 1/4 inch further back and he'd have died. In high school (and a nice suburban one at that), somebody took a skateboard to another kid and put him in a coma for two weeks, nearly killed him. Authorities had no time to step in on that one. None of the other kids in the hall thought to intervene. These two are lucky to be alive, they could have easily been killed by an object other than a gun.

      Results in 14 dead and 24 wounded, welcome to Columbine.

      What, that was four kids, premeditated intent to kill, right? You don't think they could have come up with a plan to get that many using live blades? It might involve a little more cunning than walking in and starting to shoot, but we're talking about cutting down unarmed people. Please enlighten me to what action a teacher is going to take to step in and prevent that.

      Face it, guns help kill people.

      Absolutely they help kill people. I'm not arguing they don't. I'm merely stating that people will kill people regardless of the existance of guns. If anything, guns provide a more equal playing field for that killing. Instead of the physically strong abusing the meek or even the average, anybody has the capability to inflict lethal damage. I'm not claiming anybody should want to, but merely removing guns wholesale won't stop the killing.

      It isn't that guns kill or cause people to kill. The gun is only a danger in the hands of somebody irresponsible or malicious.

      --
      If not now, when?
    21. Re:Mainly used? by onflrez · · Score: 1

      Maybe game piracy is part of their plans to get a larger market share. If playing pirated games isn't too difficult, then more people will buy 360's and presumably be onboard the Xbox bandwagon. Of course, they can't make it too easy to play pirated games.

    22. Re:Mainly used? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, if everyone carried I'd shoot to kill first and take the wallet later. Plus, bonus! I just scored a $400 gun!

      The difference is that with most weapons you can either talk, bribe, wait, run or fight your way out of the situation. Guns are too deadly too fast and,
        very convenient. Just wear gloves and drop the weapon and you're fine - most other options involve getting blood on yourself. Whoever draws first wins the fight, they're no protection at all.
      I would also ban bows, crossbows, and various melee weapons like swords. It's not perfect but it sure would be better.

      BTW, you've never had a momentary homocidal impulse? Beating someone to death requires you to hate them a lot more than shooting them on a whim.

    23. Re:Mainly used? by Phisbut · · Score: 1
      Three words, proper gun safety. When people are taught properly and know well enough to fear and respect the gun as a weapon then there aren't so many problems. When people get sloppy and forget their gun is loaded or let their eight year old play with a loaded, unlocked gun then you get trouble. If you can't observe proper gun safety you have no business owning a gun. There are many people who have no trouble whatsoever owning and maintaining their guns safely.

      I think recent history has taught us that the user cannot be trained properly in anything. This might sound like an exageration, but you could take what you just said and replace references to guns with references to a lot of things and it would sound just as right...

      Proper car safety. When people are taught properly and know well enough to fear and respect the massive amount of steel they are riding, then there wouldn't be as much speeding. When people get sloppy and drink and drive or drive recklessly in residential areas, then you get trouble. The so-called need for a driver's licence doesn't make cars safer because the people think they have a god-given right to drive a vehicle, and they keep driving it even when they lose their licence.

      Proper computer safety. When people are taught properly and know well enough not to open email attachements and not to browse the web using Internet Explorer and without a decent firewall and antivirus, then there aren't so many problems. When people get sloppy and use IE to browse the web just because it was already there, and double click on every PamNude.exe file they get, then you get trouble.

      And I could keep going...

      Further, it isn't like guns are the only things that cause accidents or injury. In third grade one of my better friends took a baseball bat to the head after accidentally walking up behind somebody taking practice swings.

      Hey... guess what? Accidents happen. Thing is, the primary purpose of a baseball bat is to hit a baseball during a game in order to have fun. The primary purpose of a gun is to kill. I don't have the numbers and I won't pull them out of my ass, but I'm pretty sure there are way fewer deaths-by-baseball-bat than death by shooting in the US, both accidental and willful.

      What, that was four kids, premeditated intent to kill, right? You don't think they could have come up with a plan to get that many using live blades? It might involve a little more cunning than walking in and starting to shoot, but we're talking about cutting down unarmed people. Please enlighten me to what action a teacher is going to take to step in and prevent that.

      First off, depending on the size of the blade, you might have a better chance of survival from a knife stab than from a gun shot, unless of course the blade is more like a sword, but then swords shouldn't be allowed either. And it's much harder to massively kill people with a knife than with a gun, I never heard of a semi-automatic knife. And although some might get hurt in the process, a bunch of people can jump on the knife wielder and pin him to the ground. While he has a gun, he can shoot them all before they can even reach him. It's easier to kill people with a gun than with a knife.

      Instead of the physically strong abusing the meek or even the average, anybody has the capability to inflict lethal damage.

      Yet, in a whole school where there were what, some hundreds, maybe thousands of people (I really have no idea of the size of the school), nobody had what they needed to inflict lethal damage to the shooters in order to protect themselves.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    24. Re:Mainly used? by dead+sun · · Score: 1

      The general idea that I've always assumed from a society that has many guns being carried is that there's no way to shoot somebody when there are others around since they'll all just draw on the threat. Of course, that requires people to overcome their apathy towards others, which may be a large flaw. But shooting to kill in a crowd with guns is probably a good way to have people shoot to kill you quickly. As far as one on one gun battles in the back alley, well, any fight away from others is going to favor the element of surprise, with or without guns.

      And no, never the momentary homocidal impulse, sorry. I can imagine a course of action that would lead to death, but I've never considered actually killing anybody.

      Oh, also, people who have been shooting tend to have traces of gunpowder on themselves. Not necessarily damning like another's blood, but still noteworthy.

      --
      If not now, when?
    25. Re:Mainly used? by dead+sun · · Score: 1

      And I could keep going...

      By all means, do. All I'm hearing is that people who don't respect what they're using hurt themselves or others. I'd argue for mandatory gun training and registration. Anybody who cannot show proper respect for the weapon doesn't get one. As far as I know there are not rigorous, mandatory classes before one can own a gun. That's a problem. People aren't being trained properly. Just this training is unlikely to cut down the injury from malicious users, but would go a long way towards addressing accidents.

      Thing is, the primary purpose of a baseball bat is to hit a baseball during a game in order to have fun. The primary purpose of a gun is to kill.

      There is such a thing as recreational shooting. Trap, skeet, target, any of those ring a bell? I've never shot at anything living and I'm quite certain that I haven't used a weapon improperly because of that. I wouldn't even make the claim that I've used guns for things outside of their purpose. The purpose of a gun is to fire a projectile. The wielder of that gun chooses the target. It is a gun's purpose to kill as much as it is a bat or club's.

      unless of course the blade is more like a sword, but then swords shouldn't be allowed either

      Because I'm sure it'd be easy to prevent the sale of any sort of metal that could be fashioned to hold an edge. I'm pretty sure those kids weren't permitted to have guns in the school either, and yet there they were. That's my whole point, it's the murderousness of certain individuals, not the tool they use to do the murdering. Don't claim removal of one object that can be used to kill will prevent murderous individuals from murdering. It won't.

      And although some might get hurt in the process, a bunch of people can jump on the knife wielder and pin him to the ground. While he has a gun, he can shoot them all before they can even reach him.

      Thanks for the laugh there, one of the best things I've heard in a while. Given the size of a general classroom and roughly 25 people in it, your average shooter would have real troubles trying to track that many objects rushing him, aiming and firing at the targets, and actually hitting and killing these targets. Factor in the number of rounds a gun holds, rate of fire, and the actual proximity of the groups of victims and if the mob mentality actually formed you'd have nearly the same situation as with a knife. But the mob didn't form, not that you can really blame them for it. I don't see why it'd have gone differently with swords.

      Yet, in a whole school where there were what, some hundreds, maybe thousands of people (I really have no idea of the size of the school), nobody had what they needed to inflict lethal damage to the shooters in order to protect themselves.

      Which leads to the next point, why are guns so restricted that when somebody does have one and begins to use it illegally that it turns into a slaughter? Can you imagine how differently things might have gone if just the teachers had guns? How about if 20% of the student body was carrying?

      --
      If not now, when?
    26. Re:Mainly used? by wes_55 · · Score: 1

      Well, I think using a gun to kill somebody is very different then killing someone with a knife. Giving everybody acces to guns is not the way to make the world saver. It's like saying giving every country access to nukes would make the world saver. The problem is that if the "bad guy" has a gun, "I" need one too. While you are the "bad guy" and "I" in the same instance. Preventing the "bad guy" from having a gun requires the same rules as you not owning a gun. We cannot predict when a "good" person turns "bad". The defintion of good and bad is a matter of opinion. IMO it's better to deny access to guns for everybody, then to allow it for everybody. I firmly beleive guns cause more deaths in environments where there allowed (easily available), then where there outlawed (meaning they are not easily available).

  9. Ability to boot non-Microsoft code more useful by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is the "piracy" hack. A way to cleanly boot non-Microsoft content would be more useful. Microsoft probably couldn't do much about that legally; if you own the unit, you have no obligation to play only approved content.

    1. Re:Ability to boot non-Microsoft code more useful by zlogic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "if you own the unit, you have no obligation to play only approved content"
      Yes, but if you try to trick (and it is the only way) the DRM that prevents non-original content from loading you're violating the DCMA.

    2. Re:Ability to boot non-Microsoft code more useful by mtenhagen · · Score: 1

      Microsoft sells the xbox360 also in places where the DCMA means nothing.

      --
      200GB/2TB $7.95 Coupon: SAVE90DOLLAR
    3. Re:Ability to boot non-Microsoft code more useful by Aranth+Brainfire · · Score: 5, Funny

      The DMCA always means something, even if it's just "Haha, boy am I glad we don't have a law like that here"

      --
      "Quoting yourself is stupid." -Me
    4. Re:Ability to boot non-Microsoft code more useful by Gadzinka · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, but booting non-MS code is much more difficult than booting copied discs. All you need to boot copies of retail games is DVD-ROM telling xbox, that it's xbox360dvd in the drive.

      In order to run unsigned binaries you have to crack several levels of protection, some of them embedded into the processor itself. And these are not your garden variety propriety measures hackable in an hour by sophomore CS student.

      So, you still can't run XBMC (NG) on Xbox360, but you can play all the pirated games you want. Weird, isn't it?

      I own original Xbox modified with DuoX modchip. Of course I have several pirated games installed on my (upgraded) HD. I would have bought some games I love (like burnout 3, 4), if it weren't for extremely stupid, suicidal policy of MS to ship Xbox with defective DVD drives that don't read DVD-R etc disks[1].

      So, for me it's funny... MS is doing anything it can to make Xbox 360 unatractive to me and to prevent me from ever buying legal copies of games for either its old or new system... ;)

      Robert

      PS If you want to condemn me as unwashed pirate, bugger off. I have a DVD collection bought legally, exceeding 300 DVD-s. Give me fair deal and I'll make your toilet solid gold. But if you want me to bend over for marginal gain, you must have been smoking something very strong all of your life.

      [1] You see, me and my wife are compulsive sci-fi/crime series watchers. Unlike me, my wife can't really comprehend them in English, so whenever I buy dvd set I process it to add Polish translation. But -- in order to play those remastered DVDs -- I had to change the Xbox DVD drive to PC DVD drive, to read DVD-R. And PC DVD drive won't read original xboxdvd discs...

      --
      Bastard Operator From 193.219.28.162
    5. Re:Ability to boot non-Microsoft code more useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In France, the media's protections are PROHIBITED!!!

      In France, the XBox360's media's protections are PROHIBITED!!!

      In France, the PS3's media's protections are PROHIBITED!!!

    6. Re:Ability to boot non-Microsoft code more useful by Animats · · Score: 1
      Yes, but if you try to trick (and it is the only way) the DRM that prevents non-original content from loading you're violating the DMCA.

      No. See SCC vs. Lexmark. This is the compatible ink cartridge case. You can't use the DMCA to prevent someone from making a compatible component.

      From the Sixth Circuit decision, "Generally speaking, "lock-out" codes fall on the functional-idea rather than the original-expression side of the copyright line. Manufacturers of interoperable devices such as computers and software, game consoles and video games, printers and toner cartridges, or automobiles and replacement parts may employ a security system to bar the use of unauthorized components. To "unlock" and permit operation of the primary device (i.e., the computer, the game console, the printer, the car), the component must contain either a certain code sequence or be able to respond appropriately to an authentication process. To the extent compatibility requires that a particular code sequence be included in the component device to permit its use, the merger and scènes à faire doctrines generally preclude the code sequence from obtaining copyright protection."

  10. drm sucks by MikeFM · · Score: 4, Insightful

    DRM is a stupid idea. It never stops hackers but it stops the average consumer from having the full use of the device they've legally bought. Making backups should be a fully protected right. Not a limited number of backup copies - as many as I happen to want to make. If I make a backup and then run it over with my car it shouldn't matter because my original is in a safe location and I can just make a new backup.

    Of course 'backup' for the copy you're using isn't a very good term.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    1. Re:drm sucks by bbqpope · · Score: 1

      I remeber buying games for the pc that came on floppies and one of the first things they told you to do was to make backups of the installer disks. I failed to do that with a few games and was sad when one of my disks for theme park was corrupt... there were like 14 disks and it took me 30 mins or so to install it.

    2. Re:drm sucks by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Any kind of disk is failable so it makes total sense to backup software, movies, music, etc. Not doing so isn't smart, not being able to is just stupid. Of course they want you to have to buy duplicates as it's much easier to sell you one item you like over and over than to make new items you'll like. Lazy bastards.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    3. Re:drm sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very good point, you pushed the general consensus one step farther.

      They put DRM to sell you the same thing over and over again, I thought it was just because they are simply greedy. But I never realized they could just have realized very cynically it's just easier this way than selling you something else.

    4. Re:drm sucks by GlassHeart · · Score: 5, Insightful
      DRM is a stupid idea. It never stops hackers but it stops the average consumer from having the full use of the device they've legally bought.

      I don't like DRM either, but one fallacy among opponents is the distinction between "average consumers" and "pirates". The problem is that average consumers can easily become pirates if various conditions are ripe: the original seems expensive, copying is easy, nobody is ever punished, etc. There are entire countries of "average consumers" who almost never buy original software or music.

    5. Re:drm sucks by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      The problem being that companies are using DRM to make up for overpriced shitty products. With a decent product and decent pricing people will buy the software. As it is the average consumer is quickly learning to find free, already cracked, copies anyhow. Either they are smart enough to find it online or they just find a friend that is. Most people I know that defend commercial software are either people trying to make a living from that software or a consumer that is getting it all for free anyway. The people that have to pay (overpay) for their software aren't as forgiving when it crashes or otherwise sucks. None sucky none overpriced is the key to profits and keeping people from copying.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    6. Re:drm sucks by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      The problem is that average consumers can easily become pirates if various conditions are ripe: the original seems expensive, copying is easy, nobody is ever punished, etc. There are entire countries of "average consumers" who almost never buy original software or music.
      The problem is that average consumers can easily become pirates if various conditions are ripe: the original seems expensive, copying is easy, nobody is ever punished, they are dirt poor, etc. There are entire countries of "average consumers" who almost never can afford original software or music.

      Fixed that for you.

      If you need examples, try China, India, Russia and most of Eastern Europe + Asia. That's the better part of 3 billion people.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    7. Re:drm sucks by imthesponge · · Score: 1

      If people think companies' products suck so much, then why do they put so much effort into getting them without paying?

    8. Re:drm sucks by hjf · · Score: 0

      I will illustrate this with an example. I live in Argentina.

      Movie Ticket: ARGENTINA: ARS 6 (USD 2). US: USD 9 (new movies, even some american ones not yet premiered in the US because movie premiers are thursdays here instead of fridays, example: http://imdb.com/title/tt0382077/releaseinfo).

      Music CD: ARGENTINA: ARS 28 (~USD 9). US: USD 17.99
      PC Game: ARGENTINA ARS 40-120 (USD 13-40). US: USD 20-80.

      And now curiously:
      Console game: ARGENTINA ARS 240-300 (USD 80-100) US: USD 20-80.
      Windows XP Pro: ARGENTINA ARS 600 (USD 200), US: USD 200.

      So what is wrong with this? 300 Pesos is the monthly income for many individuals here in my country. So, movie tickets, music CD, and PC game prices ARE adjusted for what people can buy here.
      But check the price for Win XP pro. Some people would have to work 2 months to pay for their original XP pro. I'm sure very few americans would have to work 2 months (many would have to work 2 days) to pay for their XP.

      So why aren't those prices adjusted? Newsflash: People won't spend their monthly salary in ONE piece of software. They WILL use a pirated copy. I do. I do NOT feel guilty, because what these companies do is STEAL from poor people. If they told me a copy of XP costs 200 pesos I might have an original copy, but I won't pay 600 pesos for it. Microsoft (and the game makers) have to sit down and think for a solution about this issue. And that solution is not XP starter edition. That's just a big corporation abusing the poor and the ignorant. So I'm happy if they lose against the pirates. And don't tell me to use linux. I want the games, I want the compatibility of windows, I want all these things. But I want the price for that to be fair. You can't charge the same price in the whole world (McDonald's and Coca Cola don't, and they do pretty good outside the US. So maybe Microsoft can learn a lesson from them).

    9. Re:drm sucks by Eivind · · Score: 1
      Maybe. But the fact remains: DRM causes lots of unpleasantness for the honest buyers, while having no effect whatsoever on the people who download from thepiratebay.

      Problem: digital copies are equally "good" as the original.

      Industry solution(drm): Make it so that today a copy is actually *superior* to the original.

      What is superior ?

      An original, say Bertine Zetlits-CD, that is not valid CD-audio, won't play in your car, won't play in your DVD-player, won't play in your computer, won't transfer cleanly to your ipod, won't transfer clearly to your squeezebox and can't easily be backed up.

      OR

      The pirated copy of the street in Warsawa (or bittorent) that has *NONE* of these problems.

      OK, so the original tends to have prettier box-graphics, but that's about it.

    10. Re:drm sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are entire countries of "average consumers" who almost never buy original software or music.

      God bless America!

    11. Re:drm sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're absolutely right. I'm guessing MS isn't adjusting their prices, because suddenly the whole world would be buying windows from Argentina for example. But, your points are still valid. This is the case in my country also. And the thing with piracy is, you start off pirating because you can't afford software, but in the end you just plain refuse to pay for software. Companies like microsoft don't need the money, and not even a Hurd of MS fanboys can't convince me that they aren't making an insane amount of money for the little work they put in. So I've moved away from windows. With linux, the only problem is commercial games. But anything that doesn't play with cadega seldom interests me anyway. So I suggest jumping ship. ;)

    12. Re:drm sucks by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      The problem is that average consumers can easily become pirates if various conditions are ripe: the original seems expensive, copying is easy, nobody is ever punished, etc.

      Wait, are you arguing for DRM or against it?

      DRM never has, and never will, make it any harder for the "average consumer" to pirate something. Once it's actually on thepiratebay and other such sites, the DRM's already gone. Thus, your argument is a very good argument against DRM -- why make things harder for the 2% of pirates who actually figured out how to crack it on their own, and the maybe 10% of your users who will remain legitimate customers despite your draconian DRM?

      It's now much easier to be one of the 98% of pirates for whom piracy is significantly easier than getting a legitimate copy, because of the DRM.

      DRM is beyond ineffective, it's actually counter-productive. It actually promotes piracy.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    13. Re:drm sucks by hjf · · Score: 0

      I doubt they would be buying their Windows from Argentina, because MS is mostly likely to sell Spanish windows only here, and that could only be of interest to the rest of latin america (which should have an adjusted price policy anyway), or Spain.

    14. Re:drm sucks by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      Wait, are you arguing for DRM or against it?

      I'm not arguing one way or the other about DRM. I'm talking about the fallacy frequently used by DRM opponents, as if there was a solid bloc of dishonest "pirates" and a solid bloc of honest buyers. There isn't, because people fall into one or another when conditions are ripe.

      DRM never has, and never will, make it any harder for the "average consumer" to pirate something.

      You're wrong. It stops people from giving their friends a copy of a song, the most casual kind of piracy. In fact, most people will probably not consider this an illegal or immoral act.

      It's now much easier to be one of the 98% of pirates for whom piracy is significantly easier than getting a legitimate copy, because of the DRM.

      Wrong again. iTunes managed to sell a billion DRMed songs, so it can't be too tedious.

    15. Re:drm sucks by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      Maybe. But the fact remains: DRM causes lots of unpleasantness for the honest buyers, while having no effect whatsoever on the people who download from thepiratebay.

      I suggest you read my post again. There's no such thing, plus or minus an error margin, as honest buyers. There are people who take their morality very seriously, but in general people are predictably "pirates" or "honest buyers" depending on a variety of factors.

      The Philippines is more than 90% Catholic, and even the rest are mostly still religious (Muslim, Christian, etc), yet piracy is rampant. Without DRM and other measures, it's simply easier to be dishonest, and more people will be. That's the way our world works, unfortunately.

    16. Re:drm sucks by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      Poverty doesn't enter into it when you're talking about the problem. Since when is poverty an excuse to be immoral, especially when we're talking about non-essentials like music?

      Even in rich countries like the US, given the ripe conditions I speak of, people do the "dishonest" thing readily. Remember the original Napster?

      Now, poverty does matter in the solution. The $0.99 per song offer from iTunes is successful in the US, but will still not be cheap enough in many other places. But this is just the poor telling themselves that to sleep better at night. The truth is they'll survive without the pirated songs and movies (but perhaps not software).

      Let me be very clear that I'm not condemning anybody, or being holier than thou. I've pirated my share - mostly software - growing up. I'm just trying to point out that there isn't this moral majority that'll always do the right thing even when you remove measures like DRM.

    17. Re:drm sucks by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      Poverty doesn't enter into it when you're talking about the problem. Since when is poverty an excuse to be immoral, especially when we're talking about non-essentials like music?
      Bring it on brother, it's about time we stopped overcharging the poor for digital copies that cost next to nothing to reproduce.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    18. Re:drm sucks by Eivind · · Score: 1
      First: I take issue with the idea that Catholic, or other religious people are in any way shape or form more moral than other people. I see no evidence of this whatsoever.

      Secondly: that's exactly my point: Most people aren't either-or, they're more likely to buy legally if thats convenient, cheap, available, practical, good. And more likely to pirate if *that* is convenient, easy, good, practical.

      So, by making the genuine product suck more, you *may* prevent Joe Blow from making a copy of it himself, assuming he already owns the original. But if he *didn't* already buy your product, then the effect is oposite: The existence of DRM on the genuine article is an argument in favor of getting the pirated version.

      DRM on original discs affects only people who *HAVE* original discs. This is pretty obvious.

      Thus my point stands: DRM amounts to punishing those who buy genuine goods, and rewarind those who don't.

      Those who do both will learn that Original=sucks, and pirated=good and be more likely to go for the pirated version in the future. (by sucks I mean all those problems that I mentioned in the grandparent)

    19. Re:drm sucks by rhendershot · · Score: 1

      It's a price/value proposition. Almost anything is worth a download ;)

      I used Quicken 2003 professional (or whatever they called the full version) and bought it for about $90 USD. It sucked. Quicken stopped being really useful to me, wrt increased features, back in about 1998. For about a quarter the cost, I bought Moneydance and use it on linux. It does everything I need and stuff I haven't even tried out yet.

      Would I use today's Quicken if I could get a download for free? Well, The other main competitor is Money, and the effort to try something new is a major factor, so if not for Moneydance, I'd have to say I'd be sorely tempted.

      That wouldn't prevent me from continuing to bitch about Quicken though...

    20. Re:drm sucks by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      I'm not defending the pricing policy of these copyrighted works. I think many of them are overpriced (in the morality sense) in the third world. What I'm saying is that two wrongs (the second being copyright violation) don't make a right, and poverty is no excuse. The poor can survive just fine without music or movies.

      Now, software is a different question.

    21. Re:drm sucks by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      First: I take issue with the idea that Catholic, or other religious people are in any way shape or form more moral than other people.

      I never said that they are. I'm saying that they claim to be, yet aren't, so we shouldn't expect much more of people who don't even claim to be.

      Most people aren't either-or, they're more likely to buy legally if thats convenient, cheap, available, practical, good. And more likely to pirate if *that* is convenient, easy, good, practical.

      Yes, that's what I'm saying as well.

      So, by making the genuine product suck more, you *may* prevent Joe Blow from making a copy of it himself, assuming he already owns the original. But if he *didn't* already buy your product, then the effect is oposite: The existence of DRM on the genuine article is an argument in favor of getting the pirated version.

      There are two values in conflict here. One is how much a DRM-free product is worth additionally, and the other is how much more likely people will infringe if DRM is removed. My position is that most people don't really care about DRM (as long as it "works" when they burn a CD, sync with their iPod, etc), so the value of not having it is nearly zero. On the other hand, not having DRM makes "casual piracy" much easier, and therefore (as we agreed above) will happen more.

      In other words, once you get a large number of people to agree with you that a DRM-free track is better, I'll agree with you immediately. Right now, it seems to me that factors like convenience and affordability are more important to the average user.

    22. Re:drm sucks by Eivind · · Score: 1
      I agree with you that many people aren't sufficiently aware of the drawbacks of drm to care much one way or the other, aslong as the product "works".

      But the thing is; I *don't* agree with you that drm makes "causal piracy" much harder.

      You see, DRM only makes casual copying harder if that copying starts with the original, and that's simply extremely rarely the case among the people I know.

      Basically, when they get new media/programs/games/music they *either* buy it legally, in most cases on a plastic-disc from a brick-and-mortar store. OR they pirate it casually, by downloading it from say Thepiratebay.org

      DRM provides no disintensive to the latter whatsoever. The fact that Joe Blow *migth* (or migth not) have a problem removing the drm himself is almost completely irrelevant. That would be relevant only if he first bougth the original, and THEN spread the cracked version.

      Joe Blow doesn't do that. Various 3lit3 cracker-groups with silly-sounding names do that. And they *do* have the interest, the dedication and the technical skills to kill the DRM, if needed by going trough the analog-hole. (hasn't been needed yet though).

      Joe Blow cannot himself crack CSS. This does however *not* mean that it's a problem for Joe Blow to download the latest disney-movie from somewhere.

    23. Re:drm sucks by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      The poor can survive just fine without music or movies.
      Why should they have to? it costs next to nothing to make a copy so selling it at next to nothing + a little bit and you'll get more money back than the poor buying a pirated copy for the same price.

      (PS I would say they shouldn't see them because the're crap and a huge waste of $$$Million that could be spent on.... umm.... contraception.. to help reduce the number of poor)

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    24. Re:drm sucks by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      Why should they have to?

      Because they don't own the song or the movie, and because the owner says so, and because we expect even the poor to obey laws at least when survival is not in question.

      it costs next to nothing to make a copy so selling it at next to nothing + a little bit and you'll get more money back than the poor buying a pirated copy

      I completely agree with you, but that doesn't give any poor person the moral right to infringe on the copyright of a song or a movie. We're discussing orthogonal issues here.

    25. Re:drm sucks by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      I think that if the copyright holder refuses to sell you a copy at a reasonable price (and that starts at next to nothing + a little bit) then screw them, why should they have a copy right when as a commercial company they seem to abuse it by not wanting to make any money.

      Anyhow, do third world countries (and many Asian countries) have draconian copyright laws? if not then there residents are doing nothing wrong.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  11. Nice timing! by PhoenixOne · · Score: 2, Informative
    Next week at the GDC we can ask the Microsoft rep all sorts of awkward questions. :)

    --
    Spell cheek you've failed me four the last thyme!
  12. Nice tune! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "we don't want to support piracy"

    Nice tune under that video ;-)

    B@rt

  13. Tut, tut, tut... by dwalsh · · Score: 4, Funny

    the hack has not been released to the public (because it will be mainly used for piracy)
    It is sad to see so much cynicism in the world :-)

    --
    ${YEAR+1} is going to be the year of Linux on the desktop!
  14. Surprised it took this long by ryants · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Frankly I'm surprised it took this long, given that the Xbox 360 will boot burned CDs/DVDs for backwards compatibility updates.

    I always thought that was a pretty good area of attack right there.

    --

    Ryan T. Sammartino
    "Ancora imparo"

    1. Re:Surprised it took this long by cnettel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, it doesn't help that much, as it's the signature that determines how a valid image may be started (and no commercial game will say "burned booting OK"). Now, all software written by MS really "sees" the disc as a real DVD, completely independent of whether booting from burned DVDs is supported or not. The only way to block this would be to block flashing DVD firmware (wise) or blocking reading burned discs in hardware. The latter would of course make it less usable for playing CDs or video in more or less legitimate ways that MS still wants to support.

    2. Re:Surprised it took this long by gabebear · · Score: 1

      Even if the DVD firmware is/was unflashable you can always remove/disable it and add your own. XBox 1.6s don't have flashable TSOPs but their are plenty of modchips to override their firmware.

      Also, I doubt that the XBox compatability CDs are actually booted. I'd bet that the 360 checks for that type of disk the same way it checks for DVDs and launches the software from the HD, and even then I'm sure the data has to be signed.

    3. Re:Surprised it took this long by tepples · · Score: 1

      Even if the DVD firmware is/was unflashable you can always remove/disable it and add your own.

      Unless the decryption key for the firmware differs per unit and is stored in nonvolatile write-once registers on the CPU die. This is already the case for the Xbox 360's processor; it may become the case for the DVD drive.

    4. Re:Surprised it took this long by freddyq · · Score: 1

      I always thought that was a pretty good area of attack right there.

      It can't work that easy because the media flag is hashed with the game code and protected by a 2048 bit RSA signature.

      So unless you can hack 2048 bit signatures (you can't) you are just left with (very limited) scope for software exploits, which are difficult in Xbox 360 due to the hardware and hypervisor design.

    5. Re:Surprised it took this long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the forums, they didn't actually re-flash the firmware with a hacked version (though people are supposedly working on that.) They de-soldered the drive's firmware, re-flashed it using an external device and put it back in the XBox. While making the firmware unflashable would likely slow down more casual modders, it wouldn't have prevented this team from making this achievement.

    6. Re:Surprised it took this long by gabebear · · Score: 2, Informative

      Embedding the firmware makes it impossible to inject your own firmware and makes it MUCH MUCH harder to tell how the chip works. So, yes, Microsoft could stop people from reflashing their DVD drives.

      Unlike the CPU, the chip that drives the DVD rom can be completely re-implemented with a relatively cheap FPGA. You can reverse engineer chips with electron microscopes, although it is really expensive. Mod chips could still be produced even if Microsoft decided to start making their DVD-ROMs with an embedded firmware.

      I doubt embedding the firmware into the DVD controller is really an option for Microsoft since that would drive the cost of the DVD-ROM way up. Microsoft currently just reflashes standard Samsung and Hitachi Serial ATA parts with their proprietary firmware.

      Unless Microsoft radically changes the way they make the 360, this attack should work.

    7. Re:Surprised it took this long by Forkenhoppen · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised there are no distributed computing brute-force hacking attempts on that 2048-bit RSA key. Although I suppose that would be like painting a giant bullseye on themselves.

      Maybe they're just waiting until they can get a cluster of PS3s to do the work on instead.

  15. Re:Forget Piracy. Solution For Disc Scratching Mes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've yet to have a single game, movie, or audio cd get scratched by my 360.

  16. Not releasing by Xymor · · Score: 1

    I wish they would release it at once. It will come out eventually. It's a great powerful machine will tons of cool feats, and I know lots of people dyeing to make homebrew/linux-ports/apps for it.

    1. Re:Not releasing by Illbay · · Score: 1
      You know lots of people "dying" to make homebrew Linux apps for the Xbox 360?

      What a country.

      --
      Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
    2. Re:Not releasing by gabebear · · Score: 1

      This hack doesn't allow homebrew at all. It only allows you to copy signed 360 binaries off an official 360 CD and onto a burned disk. Defeating the signed executable requirment is what will allow Linux and homebrew to be possible.

    3. Re:Not releasing by It'sYerMam · · Score: 1

      This hack does not enable homebrew anything, and nor is it necessary for homebrew code. It can only be used for making backups - whether that is legitimate is the issue.

      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
    4. Re:Not releasing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know lots of people "dying" to make homebrew Linux apps for the Xbox 360?

      You need to learn to read more carefully, he didn't say "dying", he said "dyeing".

      Obviously nobody would be prepared to die to make homebrew Linux apps for the Xbox 360 but changing a few colors is another matter.

    5. Re:Not releasing by Xymor · · Score: 1

      Sorry for my bad english. I meant dying.
      check Free60

  17. Re:Forget Piracy. Solution For Disc Scratching Mes by Ethoscapade · · Score: 3, Funny

    it's not so much "scratching" as it is "burning a series of tiny little rings in these DVDs as if they were vinyls exactly how fast is this thing spinning jesus christ the disc is actually hot"

  18. PS3 future? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the moment all gamers have been waiting for... free (or next to free) games on a state of the art game console.
    Sales of the XBOX360 are going to soar!
    This is good news for Microsoft's XBOX division.
     
    If this hack really works, then the PS3's future looks bleak, very bleak indeed...

    1. Re:PS3 future? by DrMrLordX · · Score: 1

      Are you sure about that? Yes, increased sales of the console itself gives MS a larger installed base for their console, which is normally good when purchases of licensed titles are the result. However, if the ONLY reason for purchasing a 360 is to run pirated games, then it's not necessarily a good thing for MS. They aren't making money on each console sale, after all.

    2. Re:PS3 future? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I honestly dont believe that Microsoft looses money on XBOX360 sales.
       
      Consider this scenario/business model... a hack is discovered early on allowing backup games to be played. Microsoft claims it could take some time (even years) to fix it. Massive uptake in XBOX360 consoles. Microsoft patches the hole, after target sales have been reached.
       
      Marketing genius!

    3. Re:PS3 future? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, they still have bragging & marketing rights to say "We have X many units sold, you too should buy it / make games for it"

    4. Re:PS3 future? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no profit foe M$ if I only play rented games either.

    5. Re:PS3 future? by pajeromanco · · Score: 1

      Well, you can take a look at the PS2, with lots of games published, and lots of games sold. Was the PS2 crackable? Of course. So, there's no implicit relationship between. The experience seems to tell otherwise.

      --
      Now I am sad.
  19. Anyone else notice they didn't show the back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It was probably just an oversight, given it's probably about time a hack for the 360 came out, but did anyone else notice they showed everything hooked up nice and neat to the front of the TV, but never went around to the back of it to show that there wasn't another 360 plugged in there?

    1. Re:Anyone else notice they didn't show the back? by Shemmie · · Score: 1

      Yeah right, like there's enough 360's in the wild for some guy to have two under the same roof.

    2. Re:Anyone else notice they didn't show the back? by insomniac8400 · · Score: 1

      It's like watching a terrible magic trick. It's all miss direction. Lets let them look at the decoy supposedly hacked system while we boot another one under the table. Then lets not let them see the connections in the back of the tv. This video is a joke and needs to be redone right, or the hack verified by someone else who knows how to shoot a video to truly prove the claims.

    3. Re:Anyone else notice they didn't show the back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the truth of it is, nobody gives a fuck what any of you people think. of course the video could be faked, but a video that is _SUPPLEMENTED BY THE TECHNICAL METHOD OF ATTACK_? I think it's time some of you took some distance education courses on basic logic.

    4. Re:Anyone else notice they didn't show the back? by CiaranC · · Score: 1

      The process is fully documented on xboxhacker.net. Jesus Christ.

  20. XBMC by stx23 · · Score: 1

    If the Media Connect thing streamed any type of video to the 360, I'd retire my Xbox with XBMC already. As it is, I have to wait until someone breaks the box to let me work around it.

    I'm pretty sure I'm not alone in that thinking, and that is why I watch this sort of thing with baited breath.

    1. Re:XBMC by randomdef · · Score: 1

      transcode360 can do this.

      can i have your old xbox? that would be nice. kthx

    2. Re:XBMC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Transcode 360 will allow you to watch non-MPEG/WMV videos streamed from a Windows Media Center Edition PC (by transcoding to one of those formats). Windows Media Connect is the piece of software that enables picture and music sharing with the 360 and is available for XP. The Xbox 360 won't play any sort of video over Windows Media Connect and Transcode 360 doesn't have anything to do with it.

  21. Impact on PS3 by Lomby · · Score: 1

    Really, this could impact the future of PS3 much more than the delay or Blue Ray/HD DVD madness.

    1. Re:Impact on PS3 by Alias777 · · Score: 1

      Uh, not really.

  22. Citations by OpenSourced · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From the post:
    the hack has not been released to the public

    From Jane Austen's "Emma":
    'It's to be a secret, I conclude,' said he. These matters are always a secret, till it is found out that everybody knows them. Only let me be told when I may speak out.'"

    --
    Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
  23. Re:Morality by Haeleth · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's clear that the submitter of the article doesn't think the moral case for this type of thing is strong enough to stand on its own. He has to help it along, and slightly mislead his audience despite the fact that the vast majority of the copies this is used for will be pirated copies rather than backup copies.

    Huh? The submitter wrote, right there in the summary, "it will be mainly used for piracy". I really don't see how he could have been any blunter about it. It does not look to me like there is any attempt being made to mislead readers in any way whatsoever.

    But I'm not surprised to see a response like yours. However someone phrases it, there's always someone who thinks they should have phrased it more strongly. I expect that even if the submitter had opened the article with "Filthy bloodsucking terrorist pedophile pirates have raped America's freedom once again in a savage assault on the copyright protections that keep our children safe", then someone would still have complained that he was being too sympathetic to them... ;)

  24. One small step by Enselic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I remember hackers speaking of how easy hacking the Xbox 360 will be, that it will only take hours once it is released.

    Now, 4 months after the release, they manage to hack a disc. Microsoft sure has given them a challenge this time.

    1. Re:One small step by HermanAB · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Hmm, I guess one problem is that no-one cares...

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    2. Re:One small step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the forums say that any current game can be copied, it just cannot be modified in any way lest the code signature be broken. What this firmware hack does is make the DVD drive report that a burned disc is an official XBox disc and thus the XBox allows the code to be run.

    3. Re:One small step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      to hack a disc? this is the entire disc authentication system completely reverse engineered with little or no understanding of the inner working of the 360 kernel. this is a complete sidestepping of what was probably 3 years of complete tightening of all of the 360s internal communication, integrity checking and copy protection. no one made any claims about it taking a day, and when a loose community does this in 4 months it IS god damned impressive since it is more than most people on this board could do in a fucking lifetime.

    4. Re:One small step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah, it is impressive how far people will go for warzing stuff and not paying for anything.

    5. Re:One small step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, because that's the ultimate goal here. no one wants hd-xbmc. so by your logic it's all over with now, let's see if it is.

    6. Re:One small step by ymgve · · Score: 1

      I remember hackers speaking of how easy hacking the Xbox 360 will be, that it will only take hours once it is released.

      No true hacker ever claimed that. Plenty of clueless idiots did, though.

    7. Re:One small step by evdubs · · Score: 1, Troll

      4 months after the release, people are still not seeing the xbox360 on the shelves. Perhaps Microsoft, in addition to increasing security, has made it incredibly difficult for hackers to exploit the x360 because of lack of availability.

    8. Re:One small step by imthesponge · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      How is the parent a troll? Does some mod feel the need to silence what they don't agree with?

    9. Re:One small step by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 1

      Didn't you hear? Hours after the hacker finally got his pre-order it was hacked! It just took a while to actually get the unit.

  25. Trying to eat the cake and have it too by ikejam · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm guessing the good researchers figured if they publicly took the credit AND released the code, they'll be in the crosshairs of (MS||HomelandSec:-s||Feds||++) in a minute. If its not already illegal (isnt it?) , it'll probably soon be.
    So they figure they wont release the code.
    They say, hey its possible.
    They say, hey this is the exact result.
    They say, hey this is how we've been going abt it these past few months.
    They say, sorry folks, y'know we'd love to spread the good hack around, but y'know
    piracy's piracy, and we dont want to get in range of the long arm of the law.

    24 hrs later.
    Ult.XBoxHack.360.FirmwareUpdate.CRaCkED.l33T.torre nt..

    They say, huh what??

    Well, Good Luck...

  26. LOL by bogie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "the hack has not been released to the public (because it will be mainly used for piracy)"

    Then why did they bother? Testing XP or linux to see if its security is working is one thing. That has real world consequences. Testing it is a noble cause IMHO. Hacking the firmware of a gaming system make get done to "boot linux" but we all know the real world implication here. I don't frown on this morally one bit but let's not kid ourselves here. Information may want to be free, but people want free games even more.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    1. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they bothered simply because it's a challenge, it's as simple as that. something that none of you slashdot meatheads would ever understand. LOL!!!!

    2. Re:LOL by BillyBlaze · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even towards the more noble goal of running homebrew software on the XBox360, this hack is useful. Since it is designed to run only signed code, the obvious vector of attack is to make the signed code do something bad. One way to do this is to give the signed code malicious input, which is much easier to do now, because any unsigned content on the DVD can now be changed. (Of course, maybe the whole DVD is signed, I don't know.)

    3. Re:LOL by Eskarel · · Score: 1

      Well, theoretically it would be nice to have backups of your $100 games(that's what they cost here folks). Optical media is a bit tempermental and most people's living rooms(where they keep their xbox) aren't exactly low on abuse for discs.

  27. Implications for xbox live by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I was wondering why somebody didn't try this before. It would allow you to play copied games on xbox live without getting banned as well since the main xbox firmware hasn't been tampered with, nor has any other hardware been modified in any way.

    I suppose microsoft could detect this on live by scanning the dvd drives firmware, but the data contained on the firmware itself could easily be spoofed. The other software on the xbox has to relie on whatever the firmware itself says it has. Somebody could just add code to the firmware that sends false data to external reads. All it has to do is report whatever data the console would expect it to have and then detection would become impossible.

    People who would want to cheat on xbox live would be out of luck, since afterall, the signature checks are still in place.

    --
    Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    1. Re:Implications for xbox live by cnettel · · Score: 1

      If they were elaborate, they would ask the firmware to pump every single bit back out of it. It would be quite a feat to compress it enough to fit in the code to give a fake image of itself, not just a fake version number, and do the real hack. Especially if MS decides to release an update where any non-used zero bytes are replaced by uncompressable noise.

    2. Re:Implications for xbox live by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1
      Problem with that though is checking each bit at a time would take a lot of time, which would probably annoy most of the users. But that wouldn't matter anyways as it should be easy enough for the firmware code to tell the difference between regular program execution and a read coming from the other side of the IDE controller. Afterall, the firmware code itself is responsible for carrying out such reads.

      In terms of storage space for carrying spoof data, you could always substitute the original firmware chip with a larger one that is compatible. Assuming that is even necessary in the first place, as I don't think the x360 dvd firmware uses up the entire chip.

      Hell, the bios firmware for the original xbox was only 256kb large and it resided on a 1MB tsop.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    3. Re:Implications for xbox live by Mprx · · Score: 1

      Maybe it would be possible to desolder the flash chip and replace it with a higher capacity one. Then it could contain both the official firmware for confirmation purposes and the hacked one for booting for DVDRs.

    4. Re:Implications for xbox live by WoTG · · Score: 1

      Just check while accounting for the diff's. I haven't RTFA, but I would imagine that the actual amount of changed code in the ROM is relatively small. I doubt that one would need twice the capacity to be able to report back correct false data. Now, uncompressible noise would be a problem...

    5. Re:Implications for xbox live by JRock911 · · Score: 1

      This same guy also hacked the Xbox in the exact same manner and guess what, he didn't release that one either.

      I don't really care one way or the other but it is sort of stupid to go "HA HA HA, look what I did and no, you can't have it."

      Damn attention hound.....

  28. Re:The real question is..... by gabebear · · Score: 1

    no

  29. Re:Morality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'backups' would be the generic phrase used for pirated copies for the xbox1 (primarily on forums to avoid the anti 'supporting piracy' rules). The video clearly shows both the 'backup' and the original disc in the photo also btw.

  30. But i wont release it.. by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Phfft. What garbage. If you arent going to release, it why even bother telling anyone? Its not like your work can be replicated ( proved ) and it makes you look like you are just making it up.

    " i found out the secret of area 51, but since it might be used improperly , ill just not tell you the details ".. its about as valid as he story subject.

    And as a disclaimer, im not a gamer.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:But i wont release it.. by JahToasted · · Score: 1
      Phfft. What garbage. If you arent going to release, it why even bother telling anyone?

      Obviously they intend to make a mod chip that does the same thing and make some money.

  31. This is step 1 of 2. by babbling · · Score: 1

    In order to run arbitrary code, two things are needed:
    - The Xbox needs to boot from DVD recordable discs. (this news means that's been done)
    - The encryption that checks whether or not the executable code is "signed" needs to be overcome. (yet to be done)

    So, this is important. The next part is probably harder, though.

    1. Re:This is step 1 of 2. by It'sYerMam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You don't need this hack to run arbitrary code, only the signature hack. In fact, if there were a signature hack, you wouldn't need this, as you could change the flag telling the XBox what media the executable should be run off, and then recompute the signature, or perhaps find a collision.

      For arbitrary code, you compute the signature for whatever you want - media flag and all.

      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
    2. Re:This is step 1 of 2. by MarkByers · · Score: 1

      In order to run arbitrary code, two things are needed:
      - The Xbox needs to boot from DVD recordable discs. (this news means that's been done)
      - The encryption that checks whether or not the executable code is "signed" needs to be overcome. (yet to be done)


      On the Xbox the security system was broken by taking advantage of buffer overflows and similar errors in the save/load game functions and font renderers, etc. This can be done using an unmodified DVD with a correct signature.

      I bet something similar will be found in an Xbox 360 game before too long, unless Microsoft have found some way to make this sort of error much less likely.

      --
      I'll probably be modded down for this...
    3. Re:This is step 1 of 2. by Troed · · Score: 1

      1) No
      2) They have

      Sorry ;)

    4. Re:This is step 1 of 2. by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      It's nice to see someone post a non-subjective insightful message without all the You-Dirty-Pirate or Pirates-Are-Rad editorial. Thank you.

  32. Re:Forget Piracy. Solution For Disc Scratching Mes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Proof, rather than anecdote? I find it hard to believe that the XBox 360's drive is substantially different than any other drive that is out there, and is actually worse than the thousands of different drives that have been employed for years and years.

    Please provide some actual proof of increased scratches compared to another drive or console.

  33. Re:netcrap confirms it by bod1988 · · Score: 0

    The Xbox isn't dieing, but your spelling is.

  34. Re:Forget Piracy. Solution For Disc Scratching Mes by Voltageaav · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I know. The other day, it froze up in the middle of a game after I had been playing for a while so I take the disc out and it was so hot I droped it.

    --
    Someone save me from this sanity.
  35. Re:Bollocks by Dibblah · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Uh.... Huh. You're a man, are you, Mr Anonymous Coward?

  36. Re:Forget Piracy. Solution For Disc Scratching Mes by SpryWeb · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you want to stop scratches on your original games, use d_skin protectors... Every game should have one... http://www.gamestop.com/product.asp?product_id=801 784

  37. Re:Forget Piracy. Solution For Disc Scratching Mes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh, having your 360 discs scratched is Not Funny after spending 400 dollars on the system and 50-60 bucks per game.

    Microsoft deserves the class action suit that is in the works for the scratching/disc destroying problem.

  38. Re:netcrap confirms it by __michikal · · Score: 1, Funny

    Your irony, however, is not dying.

  39. Re:Bollocks by Nicholas+Evans · · Score: 1
    You know it and I know it: the right to make a backup is nothing but an excuse for unlimited copyright infringement.

    Wrong. You are not downloading their backups, you are downloading a copy of the game INTENDED TO BE ILLEGALLY DISSEMINATED. Backups do not imply copyright violations. Warez and backups ARE COMPLETELY DIFFERENT THINGS.

  40. Re:Morality by sbma44 · · Score: 1

    Like it or not, "backup" is the term of art in these circles. And as others have noted, the submitted was pretty clear in identifying piracy as the main application for this hack.

  41. Re:Forget Piracy. Solution For Disc Scratching Mes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Had my 360 since December 05; not a scratch to be seen. I call BS.

  42. Fake - second console plugged into TV by dylan95 · · Score: 1

    This is easily faked by plugging a second console into the tv's inputs on the back of the tv.

    They don't show the inputs on the back or mention how the "hack" was done for obvious reasons - it doesn't exist, at least not yet.

    I could see the digg kids being fooled, but slashdot?

    1. Re:Fake - second console plugged into TV by pla · · Score: 0

      They don't show the inputs on the back or mention how the "hack" was done for obvious reasons

      I agree, obvious indeed! Namely, "They thought we might find it more useful to see the front of the TV". Although, I suppose you could also argue "because they don't have a transparent TV".

      Now, they could have used a mirror... But wait! We wouldn't see the back of the mirror! It might actually contain a high-resolution display rather than a mirror, which they use to trick us into thinking we can see the back of the TV! So how about two mirrors?


      As for mentioning how they did the hack... From the FP, "the hack has not been released to the public ... but all the research of the last few months is publicly viewable." Translation - Go ahead and compile your own hack (or wait for someone else to release exactly that in a few hours), they just won't give you a one-click attack.

  43. Re:Forget Piracy. Solution For Disc Scratching Mes by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    The 360 will scratch every disc you put in it...

    It was supposed to just scratch off the green ink from the edge. I guess they went a bit overboard.

    --
    What?
  44. Re:Forget Piracy. Solution For Disc Scratching Mes by zapfie · · Score: 2, Informative

    Amen, brother.

    I found the d_skin protectors on sale for a pack of 30, and they have been nothing but a blessing. Anyone who is paranoid (like me) about scratching up their disks even slightly should definitely look into buying a pack.

    It's a HELL of a lot cheaper to replace a scratched up d_skin protector than it is a $50 game.

    --
    slashdot!=valid HTML
  45. MOD PARENT UP by murderlegendre · · Score: 1

    Parent hit the nail right on the head. It's called plausible deniability.

    --
    There's a Starman, waiting in the sky / He'd like to come and meet us, but he hasn't got the time.
    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Slashcrap · · Score: 1

      Parent hit the nail right on the head. It's called plausible deniability.

      Oh. I thought you wanted him modded up for the torrent.

      I really should try and be less cynical.

  46. BS by jcuervo · · Score: 1

    I had a copy of Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory (PS2). I loved playing it; it was a fun game.

    Then I got drunk and stepped on it.

    It stopped working, unsurprisingly.

    The same (more or less) happened with SOCOM 1 (fortunately, about a day and a half before 2 came out) and Star Wars Battlefront 1.

    If I had a backup, I could still play all of these games. Sooner or later, my other games will go bad.

    And let's not forget all the movie DVDs; Bourne Identity, Star Wars I (well, no big loss, there), Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, S1M0N3... unplayable. This is just the stuff that springs to mind, for no particular reason. I'm sure I could fill Mister Goatse's "storage space" with the entire catalogue.

    For every person who believes that we shouldn't have the ability to make copies of games or movies because it will lead to piracy, there's someone who wishes like hell they could after one goes bad, either due to user fault, or just because the media sucks.

    --
    Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
    1. Re:BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "DRM is evil because I'm a careless little brat and I keep breaking my toys." That's a new one.

    2. Re:BS by daverabbitz · · Score: 1

      You're one of those bastards that rents dvd's from the store and throws them on the concrete for fun, aren't you? I swear one in four dvd's I rent won't play all the way through because of dip-shits that can't manage, take out of case, put in tray, watch, take out of tray, put in case, or maybe some of those are the other dip-shits that buy $30 DVD players from the supermarket.

      Anyway, how hard is it to not break media, I have never unintentionally broken media. Intentinal breakage is a whole nother matter.

      --
      What could be better than a jet powered motorcycle? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8l6GTHLSWE
    3. Re:BS by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I rent all my movies through Zip.Ca(canadian netflix) and although most of the discs are readable, I sometimes wonder what people are doing with them. Layers of scum on them is the worst. They still play, but you have to spend quite a while shining them up beforehand.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:BS by jcuervo · · Score: 1
      You're one of those bastards that rents dvd's from the store and throws them on the concrete for fun, aren't you?
      "Diskstomper HQ, this is Diskstomper 47. The mark is on to us. Please advise."

      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  47. Re:Forget Piracy. Solution For Disc Scratching Mes by emmaussmith · · Score: 1

    There should be a mod option that's something like '-1 Guerilla Mktg' for posts like this.

  48. I hear you on Xbox DVD drive issues by Phil+Urich · · Score: 1

    Admittedly, it's also the reason I have an Xbox in the first place; a friend of mine had to scrap his when the DVD-ROM drive just up and started not reading discs with the kind of reliability you need to actually, well, play them. So I have an Xbox, hacked it, but the way to play games is to copy them over my LAN onto the HDD, or sometimes one can convince the disc drive to copy a game to the hard drive, but it's impossible to actually play legit games legitimately.

    What I've done instead is turn it into a media system (playing downloaded or ripped movies and TV shows when I'm not playing from my computer, ex. if I'm bringing it to a friends' house and they don't have their home system set up to play videos from their computers) and also an emulator; my old NES broke a few years ago, much to my dismay, but now once again I can play Super Mario 3 on a console! Granted, it's a bit insane to be playing those kinds of games on a system as much more advanced as the Xbox, but that just makes it oddly more delicious.

    So basically, because MS used rather defective DVD-ROM drives, they really don't get much money from me for the Xbox (other than a controller I bought; the others I have are also either second-hand or even second-hand-patched-back-together-with-electrical- tape).

    But to me that's the best part of the Xbox, using it as a true multimedia piece of electronics. It's even relatively portable; not as portable as a laptop, but a hell of a lot less expensive and certainly much more portable than a full tower and all its peripherals. If the 360 was truly hacked, I would be quite interested in it; I would probably even buy legit games and all, it's just that it doesn't have the selling point if I can't have stuff like the XBMC or my old NES games on it.

    --
    I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
    1. Re:I hear you on Xbox DVD drive issues by Gadzinka · · Score: 1

      So basically, because MS used rather defective DVD-ROM drives[...]

      You see, the "defectiveness" of DVD drives is just a product of MS's DRM. They deliberately decided, that Xbox DVD can't play DVD-R/+R etc. Not just DVD media ID, but really DVD recorded discs. So they ordered drives that would have their laser IC calibrated in such a way, that it would not be able to properly play home recorder DVDs. But the side effect of this is that such DVD drive quite rapidly stops reading even "legitimate" xbox dvd discs.

      Surprised? Go, sue MS in US. In Europe I don't really care.

      Robert

      --
      Bastard Operator From 193.219.28.162
    2. Re:I hear you on Xbox DVD drive issues by PetiePooo · · Score: 1

      hey deliberately decided, that Xbox DVD can't play DVD-R/+R etc. Not just DVD media ID, but really DVD recorded discs.

      There are tutorials on how to turn up the gain on the DVD laser. They claim to fix this. I can't confirm yet, but plan on trying it soon.

  49. Why did Microsoft not use nonstandard drives? by flowerp · · Score: 1

    I think it would have been safer to use a nonstandard DVD drive which rejects burnt DVDs right away. It is trickier to hack a drive's firmware I believe. Extra security measures would have to ensure the drive is not swapped out against a standard drive.

    --
    --- Eat my sig.
    1. Re:Why did Microsoft not use nonstandard drives? by niXcamiC · · Score: 1

      You can burn backwards compatability data/firmware upgrades to a disc on a internet connected computer and put them on to the 360 if you dont have internet on it.

      --
      Chances are any disscution on Slashdot will degrade into a flamewar about ID/Christianity within 14 posts.
    2. Re:Why did Microsoft not use nonstandard drives? by Deadguy2322 · · Score: 0

      You can put the whole Internet on the 360? Has Al Gore been notified? Maybe the system IS as powerful as MS would have us believe!

      --
      Check out my foes list to see who is so retarded that they can't use the signature line!!!
  50. Whu? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is this XBox 360 of which you speak? I have heard rumors of its existence and yet, like the Loch Ness monster or an honest politician, no amount of searching on my part has shown one to actually exist. At least, not for sale in any store that hasn't turned it into a "bundle" and is selling it for at least twice the suggested retail.

  51. Re:Bollocks by GrievousMistake · · Score: 1

    Hah! I always backup or NoCD my games, ever since a Kingdom Under Fire CD went *crack-boom* in my CD drive during play. I had to take out the drive and shake pixie dust out of it. :(
    And you bet your ass I got a replacement 'backup' from a friend.

    --
    In a fair world, refrigerators would make electricity.
  52. Hm... by jonfields · · Score: 1

    Will this allow us to boot other region dvds as well (JP or EU games)

    1. Re:Hm... by Slashcrap · · Score: 1

      Will this allow us to boot other region dvds as well (JP or EU games)

      I don't think so. They've allegedly hacked the DVD firmware to stop it from telling the difference between original discs and copies and reporting that to the OS. I doubt that the region coding is at the physical media level. I don't think it is in normal video DVDs either. As I understand it the region coding is part of the CSS encryption scheme.

      In short, you would probably have to change some of the data on the disc to make it look like it came from a different region. Then the disc no longer passes the signature check, which hasn't been broken. And probably won't be unless there are major mistakes in the implementation since it uses pretty strong crypto.

  53. Re:Forget Piracy. Solution For Disc Scratching Mes by SpryWeb · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I provided a solution to the scratching problem. What did you provide? Criticism. Stop being a critical little worm with nothing to espouse except simpleton critiques of everyone else's comments.

    d_skin is the only company that I know of that has this solution, so it's not really marketing you moron. It is a way to save your games from scratches and the like. If you don't like it, MOVE ON TO THE NEXT MESSAGE!

  54. Re:Forget Piracy. Solution For Disc Scratching Mes by Thaelon · · Score: 1

    That post REEKS of marketing shill. Especially since it's your first comment ever.

    Congratulations SpryWeb you're the first person to ever make my foe list.

    --

    Question everything

  55. Re:Bollocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok champ, why dont you try strolling into any business and demand that they cease backing up their servers, accuse them all of being pirates, and demand that the police arrest them all?

    Lets see that amazing moral righteousness channeled into comedic value!

  56. It will be mainly used for legal action. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How noble of them to try and deter piracy. But now that the hacking community is aware of at least the possibility of booting copied games in this way, how long will it really take for someone with lesser 'morals' to release the hack to the public. If they really cared about piracy they would have kept their mouths shut about the whole thing. I think they might be more interested in avoiding any law suits against themselves than protecting Microsoft's intellectual property.

  57. Re:Forget Piracy. Solution For Disc Scratching Mes by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    Better yet, don't buy SHIT THAT BREAKS in the first place!

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  58. No big surprise by Myria · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you look at the design of the 360's security system, you will see that they have taken *extreme* measures to protect against running unauthorized software, but very little protection against piracy. The anti-piracy system is more or less the same as it was on Xbox 1.

    It's very obvious that Microsoft cares much more about blocking Linux and Xbox Media Player than it does about piracy. They have their priorities way out of whack.

    Melissa

    --
    "Screw Sun, cross-platform will never work. Let's move on and steal the Java language." - Visual J++ Product Manager
    1. Re:No big surprise by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Nah, they have their priorities right in order.

      Piracy? Who cares? They don't sell many of the games!

      Rather fast game console turned general purpose parralel computer for $400? Not good.

    2. Re:No big surprise by realmolo · · Score: 1

      Well, being able to run unauthorized code would mean that the "rip your Xbox 360 game to the hard drive" apps would be just around the corner.

      I think thats what MS is really worried about. Copying DVDs is still kind of a process, and not THAT many people have DVD burners. But if you can rip any game you rent to the hard drive (as you can on the Xbox), then you open up the doors for "casual" piracy.

      Hell, softmodding your Xbox is so pitifully easy that you'd be nuts to *not* do it. MS doesn't want that situation with the 360.

    3. Re:No big surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft loses a ton of money on the xbox hardware...they don't care about piracy because they are absolutely terrified that people will buy the hardware and be able to use it as a regular computer (and thus, purchase no xbox software, which is where they make all their money)

  59. xbox 360 by vision864 · · Score: 1

    I have to wonder if all the console is looking for is the dvds booktype wouldnt a Dvd +r burner with bitsetting enabled meet this requirement without the console being modified at all?

  60. Is it real? by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

    A video with annoying music doesn't give me much confidence that this is real. However, I've thought from the beginning that the DVD firmware was the 360's greatest weakness, although I didn't know if it had to be signed or something.

  61. RtFA... by Faeton · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Please read the article!

    This isn't just a "Oh, I'll put this firmware on a disk and load it up and Bam!, insta-pirate!". This is a firmware for the DVD-ROM, which you first have to A) physically open up the XBox360 B) Then remove the DVD-ROM C) then desolder the firmware chip D) then read the firmware and figure out where to edit, because each DVD-ROM has a unique ID tag E) then you have to reprogram the chip using specialized equipment F) reinstall the chip and hope you didn't ruin a $400+ machine G) get a good copy of a game and hopefully it'll work.

    Currently, this is *far* harder than the average modchip. Since each chip has to be custom-programmed, this isn't an easy hack, even if you did have the hacked firmware available.

    Still, hopefully this is a taste of things to come. The 360 has been only out for 4 months, and this is much better progress than with the original XBox.

  62. I'm not sure how it read to everybody else but by goldcd · · Score: 1

    "We've hacked MS's copy-protection"
    "we've given a rough idea about how we did it"
    "We're not going to release the details for fear of piracy"

    Guess who's waiting for a fat MS cheque for 'security consultancy' in the post over the next couple of days.

  63. I'll take one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This makes all the difference to me. Living in SE Asia I buy a *lot* of _cheap_ games (as opposed to when I lived in Ireland and bought 1 or 2 very carefully considered games). I'll pay for the worthwhile online games if there are any, meanwhile pick up all the other crap for free. I've been a chipped PS2 user for years but having seen dashboard mods and a couple of nice games (Ninja Gaiden) it put me wondering...anyway while I am waiting for the obligatory tekken 6, I might as well forget that Geforce XYZZY and pick up one of these.

    anyway this will do use things for sales of the machine, especially in Asia, in my experience.

  64. Re:Forget Piracy. Solution For Disc Scratching Mes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Notice how it's a woman that's bitching at you ("emma").

    Women should not have any rights, emma is a wothless bitch-whore who I hope dies soon.

    Death To women's Rights

  65. Now I may just be paranoid, BUT... by hine_uk · · Score: 1

    ...this looks like the golden oppotuninty Microsoft will use to relase the HD-DVD enabled version of the Xbox360 "that was never coming out!". It gives them carte blanche to release it with a "valid" excuse. Expect in about 3 months or just before the PS3 to be rereleased with a new "protected AND upgraded machine, for your benefit"

    It might also be a way to increase sales, correct me if im wrong but dont easily piratable machines seems to enjoy a larger machine market share which is just what MS want?

    1. Re:Now I may just be paranoid, BUT... by cornface · · Score: 1

      It might also be a way to increase sales, correct me if im wrong but dont easily piratable machines seems to enjoy a larger machine market share which is just what MS want?

      This must explain the roaring success of the Dreamcast and the original Xbox.

    2. Re:Now I may just be paranoid, BUT... by Alderin1 · · Score: 1

      It might also be a way to increase sales, correct me if im wrong but dont easily piratable machines seems to enjoy a larger machine market share which is just what MS want?

      Absolutely not. Console vendors don't make money on the consoles, they make their money on software licenses. The original Xbox began it's sales at over $100 loss per unit, and that loss grew as the console aged. That's why MS was so pissed about people running Linux on it and turning it into a cheap PC... they wouldn't be buying games, so they wouldn't make any money. It's also their big gripe about pirating... no game sales, no offset for the loss they built into the original box.

      --
      No conformist ever made history.
  66. Clearly fake. by insomniac8400 · · Score: 1

    I think this is a case of a group of guys looking at the hacker stuff on a webpage to see what is plausible with the information. Then claiming they succeeded, knowing unless someone does exactly what they did, no one can prove it wrong. And that is why they won't release it. You don't see the back of the tv, so a different xbox can be hooked up to it in the back. Also if you watch the cable on the left side of the screen, it never shows the full cable. The cable could easily be going off the table and a new one from another xbox coming onto the table. They just coiled it up so you would still perceive that it's all one cable. I feel sorry for all the guys on tha forum giving the guys who did this high praise and thanks, while ignoring the noob flaws in the video.

    1. Re:Clearly fake. by romman666_07920 · · Score: 1

      I'll second that! Got to see the back of the TV.

    2. Re:Clearly fake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The lazer wouldnt move the way it does, if its not reading the copy. So its not a fake.

  67. Re:Forget Piracy. Solution For Disc Scratching Mes by zapfie · · Score: 1

    Uh.. except for the lack of any kind of affiliate link..

    Seriously, let's say he WAS related to d_skin somehow.. if he really was looking to market these things, why would he waste effort on a one-time slashdot post buried on a page somewhere?

    Even if he WAS in it for marketing, his point's still valid. I happen to own d_skins too, and they're a damn good product that have saved my ass more than once from well-meaning idiots handling my discs. It's sad how quickly you'd add someone to a foe list based on paranoid instincts they might be in it to sell something..

    --
    slashdot!=valid HTML
  68. There is strong evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is strong evidence that no data format will take off until it can be copied easily.

    The PS1 really took over when it was hacked to play copies. Same for PS2. Same for XBox. Same even for the bog-standard Video DVD.

    To MS's way of thinking, even if you hack the thing to play copies at least they still control what you're playing. Running Linux on the Xbox was probably a lot more irritating to MS than all the hacks that let you copy the games to the HD.

    It's all about *control*.

  69. Not any different than past console hacks.. by Viewsonic · · Score: 1
    Usually its always replacing a chip somewhere to allow this to happen. The cool thing here is that drive firmware can be rewritten. Once someone figures out how to run unsigned code, you'll see an ISO that will update your drives firmware without needing to put a hacked firmware chip in making it even less painful.

    Either way, 360 devs are shitting themselves right about now. When this happened with the Dreamcast, developer support disappeared and went to the PS2.

    I have a feeling a lot of current XBox360 projects are about to be turned into PS3 projects.

    1. Re:Not any different than past console hacks.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      that's ridiculous, developer support for the dreamcast was almost non-existant long before the first pirated copy. once ea dropped out it was all downhill. please, stop making things up.

    2. Re:Not any different than past console hacks.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, given that PS3 appears to he postponed indefinitely I was thinking just the opposite.

  70. Re:netcrap confirms it by mconeone · · Score: 1

    did you read the post he replied to?

  71. Stop doubting this hack. by Ub312g0d · · Score: 1

    I dont see why everybody here is accusing this group of faking their results. This work has been documented and been going on for sometime in the xboxhacker.net forums. Virtually the same hack was developed for the original xbox along the way and being able to adapt that firmware for the updated version of the LG/Hitachi from the first xbox to the new drive was only a matter a time.

    1. Re:Stop doubting this hack. by Is0m0rph · · Score: 1

      I agree this is not a fake. This a credible person from the xbox scene message boards that released the same hack for the Xbox.

  72. where's slashdot? by ThinkOfaNumber · · Score: 1

    At the time of my posting, you had a score of 5, informative, for posting http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyZQ4k7Bi-8 but from youtube:

    Sites linking to this video:
    826 clicks from http://www.xbox-scene.com/
    236 clicks from http://xbox-scene.com/
    185 clicks from http://www.xbox-scene.com/xbox1data/sep/EEukZpklFA hk...
    96 clicks from http://www.xbox-scene.com/index.php?newsview=1
    53 clicks from http://forums.xbox-scene.com/index.php?showtopic=4 98519

    they haven't been slashdotted yet! Not even 53 clicks from slashdot? oh well...

    1. Re:where's slashdot? by Frozen+Void · · Score: 1

      1.some Slashdotters have referrers disabled.
      2.Some of them dislike Xbox and MS built crap.
      3.The video isn't that interesting,i haven't checked it myself.
      4.isnt "OMG hacked Xbox" thing.Its doesnt run linux and its not available to public.I doubt its even useful unless you're Xbox gamer.

    2. Re:where's slashdot? by ThinkOfaNumber · · Score: 1

      I agree with you - I never implied anyone _should_ visit, just that I thought with the +5, more than a few mods and people with nothing better to do (eg. myslef) _would_ have visited. It's interesting to see the difference between what someone thinks is "informative" and what they actually click on to see.

  73. My thoughts by Twikie · · Score: 1

    Referenced was "Microsoft aims for hack-proof 360" from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4218670.stm where Chris Satchell of Xbox states, "There are going to be levels of security in this box that the hacker community has never seen before."

    A funny quote from the above article, "With the 360, Microsoft is aiming to make it as hard as possible to hack."

    Even harder than consoles that will be released a hundred years from now?

    Another interesting note, "But Mr Satchell admitted no system was fool-proof and that, with enough time and dedication, the security on the Xbox 360 would be broken."

    So, they are admitting that over time (4 months in this case), hackers will bypass any given security. It makes me wonder if the months of time and millions of dollars that companies spend on false security is worth it when probably more than 99% of consumers are going to legitimately buy all of their games because they have only recently mastered setting the time on their VCR.

  74. Re:Forget Piracy. Solution For Disc Scratching Mes by tcc3 · · Score: 1

    Yeah this is more anti Xbox propaganda. I've had my 360 since launch. Ive played all manner of 360 and xbox titles, as well as movies and burned media, with no scratching. It hasnt burned my house down either.

    If yours has a problem call MS. By many accounts they are quite helpful.

    Uh-oh. Kutaragi's gonna come after me now....

  75. Re:Forget Piracy. Solution For Disc Scratching Mes by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    d_skin is the only company that I know of that has this solution, so it's not really marketing

    Just because something's innovative doesn't mean it's not marketing.

    Oh, and they don't work, and they cost too much relative to the price of a new blank disc.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  76. Yeah, right by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    Because we all know it's possible to make a torrent to do this for you:

    1) Get the key out of the firmware.
    2) Put the key into the cracked firmware.
    3) Flash the cracked firmware back onto the chip.

    And let's not forget, you have to do all of this directly to the firmware chip. There's no known way to flash it without physically unsoldering it, then flashing it with a separate tool, then soldering it back on.

    Oh, and why in the name of all that is holy do people insist on making torrents of these? Do you know how big firmware is? Probably barely bigger than the torrent file itself would be.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    1. Re:Yeah, right by HTL2001 · · Score: 1

      "Oh, and why in the name of all that is holy do people insist on making torrents of these? Do you know how big firmware is? Probably barely bigger than the torrent file itself would be."

      Disclaimer: None of the files shown here are actually hosted on this server. The links are provided solely by this site's users. The administrator of this site (xxx.xxxx.xxx) cannot be held responsible for what its users post... etc.

      --
      By reading this, you have given me brief control of your mind.
  77. Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cheers for the link!

  78. two firmware banks? by Brit_in_the_USA · · Score: 1

    Thinking about it, I see the possibility for black market for pre-hacked Xbox DVD drives (send in your old one and get it back hacked etc.) that have been pre-moded with a firmware "bank" selector switch, to enable the user to select for original code (for games that check for it) and the hacked code.

    In fact the switch could act as a safety device that also cuts out the network port link when in the "hacked bank" mode (just add more pole/throws to the switch and route one of the Ethernet Tx or Rx wires through it) so you don't accidentally get banned.

    In addition these enterprising companies could also offer an "ultra" version that has programmer and interface built into / hanging off the DVD drive which comes out to an external connector port so you can easily link to your Xbox DVD drive to a PC for future DVD firmware updates without opening the case again.

    Of course this would all be for "fair use" of something (?) .... !

    1. Re:two firmware banks? by DrRotmos · · Score: 0

      This is NOT possible. The DVD unit has a special key, tied to the motherboard. You can not take a DVD unit from one Xbox 360 and put it in another Xbox 360.

  79. Interesting tags on this story by SleepyHappyDoc · · Score: 1

    It amuses me that this story was tagged 'piracy', but not 'fair use'. I guess even us Slashdotters have been sucked in by the propaganda.

    --
    Stasis is death. Embrace change.
  80. Only a matter of time... by David+Webb · · Score: 1

    until some enterprising individual(s) make light of this information to help construct a mod chip to bypass the security of the xbox 360. I feel that microsoft came out with a very arrogant stance of almost " you can't hack this" despite what this chris character is quoted as saying. I've said before if there is money to be made in locking something then there is also money to be made in unlocking something. At this rate I predict a mod-chip(s) that will permenantly bypass msft xbox360 security by years end.

  81. This was on digg too... it's a fake by Gogela · · Score: 1

    These jokers didn't hack anything. This is a total fake. Their video is cut and there's another measure of security they didn't even mention. This is all BS. Don't get me wrong, I'm sure modding the 360 is only a matter of time... I just think the way these guys have been manipulating digg and slashdot comments says a lot. YOU GUYS ARE FAKES!

    --
    A hungry man will tell you anything if you give him a cookie.
  82. I'll suspend my disbelief for the moment by FoamingToad · · Score: 1

    given the recent bashing that was offered to the chap who managed to get Windows running on the Mac.

    I'm not saying I'm 100% convinced, just that saying that there could be a second machine plugged into the TV doesn't mean that it _has_ been faked.

    F_T

  83. Fake - NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you read the postings on XBH.net forums you will see that they have been working their way towards this since December last year. The technical information posted there clearly states what needs to be done in the way of the firmware changes. From what I have read (and followed closely), the changes required do more than just emulate the book type. There is a very detailed challenge response mechanism which has been explained in depth on the site.

    Anyway, I think the 360 will sell more now. Hell, if it had been an 'open' platform from day one, I would have bought one already. 95% of people pirate something, often without seeing themselves as a pirate. I think DRM has gone mad, and the tougher it gets the more determined people are to copy stuff. I will buy a 360 when it can run Linux, and then MS will make money off me from game purchases. Unless the PS3 hits first, which is supposed to come with Linux already!?!

  84. Beware of PR speak by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

    "less feature-full" = "no online play".

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  85. Re:Forget Piracy. Solution For Disc Scratching Mes by Xugumad · · Score: 1

    It's a good point... well, as not exactly my first post :) ... I've been seeing scratches appearing on my XBox 360 discs, and one actually had to go back because it stoped playing. I ordered some d_skins, which arrived this morning - they're kinda funky, but rather expensive. Also, they make my XBox 360 drive make weird noises, mostly a freaky grinding noise when the disc spins up - I suspect they're just aggravating a dying drive, though.

    Erm, yeah, some sort of conclusion... if you're worried about scratches, they seem a good solution so far. I'd rather have a $1 d_skin die rather than a $60 XBox 360 game, and all that...