Slashdot Mirror


First HD-DVD Player Goes On Sale

An anonymous reader writes "If you live in Japan, you can get your hands on the first commercially available HD-DVD player as of today. Toshiba has launched the HD-XA1, and hopes for sales in the next year to exceed 600,000 units. The device is set to debut in the states in April. From the article: "The player will sell for 110,000 yen (US$936) in Japan. In that market there will also be a cheaper player, the HD-A1, priced at $500. Toshiba said the price in Japan is based on its expectation that video enthusiasts will be first to adopt the technology, while in the United States, the prices are aimed more at average consumers who are more price conscious." Update: 03/31 18:45 GMT by Z : Quoted article updated, quote updated to match the article.

186 comments

  1. techie by caffeinemessiah · · Score: 4, Interesting

    even for a techie early adopter, somehow the knowledge that there's a war brewing makes these things quite undesirable. i wonder if the people who actually buy it at this point know what's coming...?

    --
    An old-timer with old-timey ideas.
    1. Re:techie by AeroIllini · · Score: 4, Interesting

      even for a techie early adopter, somehow the knowledge that there's a war brewing makes these things quite undesirable. i wonder if the people who actually buy it at this point know what's coming...?

      Especially since crippling DRM limiting the fair use rights of paying customers for the sake of stopping a phantom piracy threat are included right there in the spec.

      Yeah, this should go well.

      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
    2. Re:techie by SIGALRM · · Score: 2, Insightful
      i wonder if the people who actually buy it at this point know what's coming...?
      Yes, and I wonder if the people buying also realize that today, there are virtually zero movies available in that format...
      --
      Sigs cause cancer.
    3. Re:techie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      936 and 800. I guess less IS more.

      and big is the new small.

    4. Re:techie by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Why do they need support for these huge capacity discs when they also mandate mpeg4 compatibility from the players? They can fit a full length movie in HD now on a double layer DVD if they use mpeg4. What is the point?

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    5. Re:techie by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, and it doesn't get any better that the competing format is the same, as for the main AACS protection. Additionally, Blu-rays will have a disc identification layer to trace mass production piracy.

      When I'll get any of these next generation formats, it will be once burners have arrived, and for data storage. I'll likely still go for it when the price and availability matures, because the storage amount is quite attractive.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    6. Re:techie by Robotron23 · · Score: 1

      Yes, and I wonder if the people buying also realize that today, there are virtually zero movies available in that format...

      Dude, the virtually zero series totally rocks - I'd rate it alongside Firefly any day of the week. I mean OK, its marketing has been fairly weak, and the movies came out too soon after the TV series, traits it shares with Firefly - but the geek niche hunting out the HD-DVD players will certainly have heard of it!!!!

    7. Re:techie by Danga · · Score: 1

      They can fit a full length movie in HD now on a double layer DVD if they use mpeg4. What is the point?

      Probably that not all DVD players now can decode mpeg4 or output true HD resolution. The biggest reason I am sure of is it is another way to make more money.

      --
      Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
    8. Re:techie by GWBasic · · Score: 1

      If I had a HTPC I'd be eagerly awaiting the day that I can install an HD-DVD drive and a Blue-ray drive. The only problem is that I haven't seen any high-def movies planned that I actually care to watch.

    9. Re:techie by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Oh I know that. Most DVD players certainly can't decode mpeg4 at HD resolution, that takes some power that wouldn't make sense to put on a DVD player because the only content that would take advantage of it doesn't exist. What I'm talking about is why didn't they just make a new "format" that uses the old format, instead of making us pay for these new exotic lasers. This format would still require a new player, but it would still only need a red wavelength laser.

      The whole deal would have been able to have been released years ago and it would now be at a reasonable price.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    10. Re:techie by modecx · · Score: 1

      What I'm talking about is why didn't they just make a new "format" that uses the old format, instead of making us pay for these new exotic lasers. This format would still require a new player, but it would still only need a red wavelength laser.

      Actually that's what HD-DVD started out to be, before it got bastardized. They were supposed to be basically regular DVDs (or they used the same wavelength laser at any rate) with MPEG4 encryption, plus some more resiliant DRM. Though, HD-DVD is still supposedly going to be able to use red lasers to read HD-DVD content produced through modified DVD production lines, so that's a good thing. HD-DVDs should therefore cost almost nothing more to produce.

      Personally, if the format is a good format, and it has good support, and they come out with some HD-DVD burners soon, I'll embrace it. The prices will drop, and everyone will have it eventually, just like CD drives, CD burners, DVD drives and DVD burners... And then we'll be onto something else like Super HD-DVDs, then Mega HD-DVDs and then Hyper HD-DVDs (now with Holographic Technoloby®.)

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
  2. no region coding by spazoidspam · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From TFA: The HD-XA1 has no region coding for the HD-DVD content

    I guess thats a slight incentive to buy this early, but not enough to justify the rest of the horribly crippling DRM features it will have.

    1. Re:no region coding by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      Unless of course discs wont even work with it because of some damned DRM system. very well could be.

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    2. Re:no region coding by westlake · · Score: 1
      I guess thats a slight incentive to buy this early, but not enough to justify the rest of the horribly crippling DRM features it will have.

      The discs will work fine for most users. Microsoft has been pushing for mandatory managed copy in HD-DVD. It won't be better and could certainly be worse with Blu-Ray.

  3. Math? by AeroIllini · · Score: 5, Funny

    The player will sell for 110,000 yen (US$936) in Japan, which is less than the $800 price tag it will carry in North America.

    $936 $800.

    Smooth.

    --
    For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
    1. Re:Math? by farker+haiku · · Score: 1

      Damn, you beat me to it.

      --
      Your sig(k) has been stolen. There is a puff of smoke!
    2. Re:Math? by AeroIllini · · Score: 5, Funny

      Curse that Preview button!

      My post, with the correct characters:

      The player will sell for 110,000 yen (US$936) in Japan, which is less than the $800 price tag it will carry in North America.

      $936 < $800.

      Smooth.

      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
    3. Re:Math? by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      $936 $800.

      Slashcode is just starving for some angle brackets.

      Smooth.

    4. Re:Math? by kraada · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, he was making a subtle joke: less is more.

    5. Re:Math? by bracher · · Score: 1

      This is the new new math. ;-}

    6. Re:Math? by Rolan · · Score: 1

      That was a quote from the article....which has since been changed to remove the $800 price mentioned...

      --
      - AMW
    7. Re:Math? by Ruie · · Score: 1
      The player will sell for 110,000 yen (US$936) in Japan, which is less than the $800 price tag it will carry in North America.

      Math ? - No, but behold the Power of Marketing!

    8. Re:Math? by bobintetley · · Score: 1

      Actually, Less is much better than more. It has a website for starters.

    9. Re:Math? by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

      Must be that darned New Math they're teaching in the scrools these days. Either that or real American dollars are worth more than Japanese dollars. Or maybe submitter was talking about $800 Canadian after the Canadian dollar passes the US dollar.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    10. Re:Math? by charlesnw · · Score: 1

      Um your Md5 hash isn't accurate :)

      --
      Charles Wyble System Engineer
    11. Re:Math? by Bueller_007 · · Score: 1

      And the best part is: that line isn't even in the article.

      FTFA:
      "The player will sell for 110,000 yen (US$936) in Japan. In the North American market there will also be a cheaper player, the HD-A1, priced at $500."

      No mention of the HD-XA1's price.

    12. Re:Math? by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1

      Actually, Less is much better than more. It has a website for starters.

      Yeah but can you less | more?

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    13. Re:Math? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The hash technically couldn't be accurate, because his signiture(part of the hash) also contains the hash result, thus changing the sig. Not that he was trying to humor us or anything.

    14. Re:Math? by jrockway · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Yeah but can you less | more?

      Yes, you can.


      [~] 1 (jon@powerwire)
      $ echo "foo bar" | less | more
      foo bar

      [~] 1 (jon@powerwire)
      $

      --
      My other car is first.
    15. Re:Math? by DrewCapu · · Score: 1

      You sure nothing else was left out? Maybe you can get a third 5/Funny.

    16. Re:Math? by kesuki · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      perhaps it is more like 110,000 yen is comperable to an american enthusiast spending $800 usd on a video player? afterall there are median incomes, etc other factors BEYOND exchange rate to consider here. although difficult to pinpoint if that's the case, according to statistics on 'nationmaster.com' http://www.nationmaster.com/country/ja/eco
      http://www.nationmaster.com/country/us/eco
      The average income is $1,400 USD greater in japan than in america. and consider that based on the statistics gathered by nations master that japan is the 110thh MOST ienquitabbly distributed wealth nation in the world the chart only ranks 116 countries btw) there are only 6 countries with a more equitable distribution of income. so yeah, i'd have to say that in a country where Median income comes the closest to Meaning typical income... instead of a country where 'median income' is just a statistic, and the 'normal income' is actually considerably below that (america is the 31th most inequitable distributor of weath in the world, we've got the uber rich like bill gates the wal-mart family etc, and then we've got 13% of our population BELOW the poverty line etc.) that paying $986US in japan is a lot more like paying $500US in the US.

      so um it's not a matter of math, it's a matter of wealth distribution. in japan the average working joe is far better off than they would be in america.

    17. Re:Math? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e.

      Heh, that's quite a popular md5 hash you have there. :)

      gid@pimpbot ~ =) $ touch t
      gid@pimpbot ~ =) $ md5sum t
      d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e t

      -- gid

    18. Re:Math? by Nazmun · · Score: 1

      PS3 $500 max with blu-ray accessories to make watching bluray smoother won't cost more then $30 bucks.

      Plus there will be lots more then 600k units moved within the first 3 months. Toshiba's gonna have to step up and make a sleeker, cheaper, unit to compete.

      --
      Hmmm... Pie...
  4. Or you can wait until the PS3 ships by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And buy essentially the same thing for less than $500 US.

    Remember, the first rule of marketing - early adopters of electronics pay $1000 to $2000, people who can wait for the bug-free version pay $500-$1000, and people who can wait until more than fifty percent adoption pay $300-$500, at the zero, one, and two year marks.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Or you can wait until the PS3 ships by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      That's the first rule of marketing? I thought it was 'sex sells'.

      That's one. Another is "Never underestimate the consumer. It's impossible."

    2. Re:Or you can wait until the PS3 ships by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure by the time the PS3 comes out (when is it, like a year from now?), HD DVD players will not be $1000-2000.

    3. Re:Or you can wait until the PS3 ships by Ravatar · · Score: 1

      You're under the assumption that the PS3 will ever launch...

    4. Re:Or you can wait until the PS3 ships by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Less than $500? Last I heard, $500 was the lowest price expected for the PS3, with estimates placing it retailing at around $800, with Sony taking a good $100 loss or so per unit.

      The lowest price HD-DVD player that Toshiba is making is going to cost $500. That's just a player. The PS3 is using a more complicated format and requires all the console hardware. So, essentially, you're taking the XBox360 with a hard drive (about $400) and merging in the HD-DVD player (about $500) - presto, $900, ballpark figure. Of course, that's double-counting a media drive, so you can subtract $20 or so for the DVD drive in the XBox360. You're still looking at an $800 console.

      There's absolutely no way the PS3 will cost as little as $500. Sony's already admitted this - "household gamers" aren't the PS3's target audience. No clue who is, but they're already planning on not being able to sell it to average people.

      So, yeah, the PS3 will probably be slightly cheaper than the top-of-the-line HD-DVD player. Now.

      By the time the PS3 actually launches, you can expect HD-DVD players to cost a fair bit less.

      Face it, Sony blew it with the PS3. If they were going to succeed, they should be getting ready to launch it in Japan right now. Right now we're not expecting to see the PS3 in the US until early 2007.

    5. Re:Or you can wait until the PS3 ships by chrnb · · Score: 0

      Another rule is: lie, Lie LIE!!

      -_-

      --
      MikMik Baby Organics Mikkaworks
    6. Re:Or you can wait until the PS3 ships by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, that's the FIRST rule? Marketing has become so complicated.

    7. Re:Or you can wait until the PS3 ships by Jason+One · · Score: 1

      Wrong. The PS3 will only play the competing format, Blu-ray, not HD DVD.

    8. Re:Or you can wait until the PS3 ships by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      You're under the assumption that the PS3 will ever launch...

      I'll bet it'll launch before the Phantom Gaming console :)

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  5. What about movies? by dalmiroy2k · · Score: 0

    Ok we got an overpriced player... Does at least come with a HD-DVD demo or something to showcast? Any killer HD-DVD movie release available right now?

    1. Re:What about movies? by Azarael · · Score: 1
      Any killer HD-DVD movie release available right now?
      That's my first question. I'd go as far as to ask if ANY content will be available for the release (beyond maybe a handful of titles). Have any of the studios even made announcements about when content will be made available?
    2. Re:What about movies? by birder · · Score: 1

      Some of the supporting studios have made motions to release movies this year but no dates.

      I think these have been delayed but Million Dollar Baby, The Last Samurai, Phantom of the Opera (2004) are supposed to be out next month or May.

      Followed by:

      5/23 - Crash, Lord of War, The Punisher, Saw, Terminator 2: Judgment Day
      5/23 - The Last Waltz
      5/23 - 50 First Dates, The Fifth Element, Hitch, House of Flying Daggers, A Knight's Tale, Resident Evil: Apocalypse, xXx
      6/6 - Underworld: Evolution (day and date)
      6/13 - Robocop, Species, The Terminator
      6/13 - Kung Fu Hustle, Legends of the Fall, Stealth, S.W.A.T.
      6/13 - The Devil's Rejects, Reservoir Dogs, Total Recall, Stargate, Frank Herbert's Dune

      That's about it.

    3. Re:What about movies? by cerelib · · Score: 1

      I remember watching a webcast of a Bill Gates keynote in which he demo'ed an HD-DVD of "The Bourne Supremacy". Whether that was a real HD-DVD or just some pre rendered demo, I don't know. It seemed pretty cool. Instead of just turning on audio director commentary the director could appear on the screen and point to things in the movie while it was playing.

    4. Re:What about movies? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1
      (day and date)

      Ah, that takes me back to the late 90s; people complaining about DVD versions not being released day and date with the VHS versions, people buying the Japanese LD of Phantom Menace, and the entire Home Theater market getting together to crush DivX.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  6. Gatorade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    10 50.

    10 is less than 50!

  7. 600 to 700k worldwide sales? by garcia · · Score: 2, Informative

    Toshiba expects to sell 600k to 700k of these units?! There isn't enough shelf-space worldwide to hold those devices at that size.

    They mention in the article that there will be a lower-end version for sale in North America for around $500. I couldn't find any specs or reasons for the lower cost. Anyone else?

    1. Re:600 to 700k worldwide sales? by Anonymous+Luddite · · Score: 2, Informative

      >> I couldn't find any specs or reasons for the lower cost. Anyone else?

      some info here

      Sounds like the 300 bucks gets you better soound and usb ports..

    2. Re:600 to 700k worldwide sales? by aesiamun · · Score: 1

      It's not that big. The person holding the dvd is holding one of those mini cds from the mid 90s and is a midget.

    3. Re:600 to 700k worldwide sales? by toby34a · · Score: 1

      Dude... it looks like an ancient '70s VHS player... except it's not top-loading.

    4. Re:600 to 700k worldwide sales? by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      My god. It's a like an XBox and an early 80's VCR mated

  8. not a investment worth making, yet... by yagu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Man, the first people who buy these babies are either crazy, stupid, or just like to spend their highly expendable capital.

    For the consumser's cool $1000 he (or she) gets:

    • a DVD player that may or may not play DVD's at their rated resolution.
    • possible negilible improved quality picture on HD tv's (how many tv's out there are capable of 1080p yet? For that matter, is this unit capable?)
    • a tepid pool of possible available selections
    • a potentially incompatible format and a worthless future library of media (I know lots o' slashdotters will be too young to remember, but I'm not -- think Beta).
    • an unknown quantity -- how onerous will be the DRM on this unit (scary considering this paragraph from the article:
      The player was originally due out late last year, but delays in completing a content protection specification meant Toshiba had to push the launch back a few months. The player goes on sale just over a month after a preliminary version of the specification, called the Advanced Access Content System (AACS), was completed.
      )
    • total isolation in the support world -- good luck trying to troubleshoot these puppies... you're not going to get the help you need at Circuit City, Best Buy, et. al.

    This new unit is not for the faint of heart, but I know the consumers are out there to break ground for the rest of us. God Bless them and their expendable income.

    1. Re:not a investment worth making, yet... by jonnythan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They will play HD-DVD's at high res. There's no argument over this.

      Also, there is *no doubt at all* to anyone who owns an HDTV of any size that DVD's are significantly inferior to broadcast HD programming. When American Idol has a sharper picture than the newest $20 King Kong DVD, something is wrong.

      "Early adopter" gear has never been for the feint of heart. This applies to HDTV's, DVD players, VHS decks, CD players, you name it. You don't buy the first generation of a technology expecting it to work just fine for Joe Schmoe or if $1000 breaks the bank.

      HD-DVD offers *clear* advantages to the techie/early adopter bracket, and I'd buy one if I had a spare thou to throw around.

    2. Re:not a investment worth making, yet... by blackmonday · · Score: 2, Funny

      Right on.

      In a couple years we'll be playing HD-DVD and Blu-ray through a $40 player made by Apex with a "Secret Menu".

    3. Re:not a investment worth making, yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, the first people who buy these babies are either crazy, stupid, or just like to spend their highly expendable capital.

      I had a friend who bought a 1st gen VCR, for ~$900. The same guy bought a 1st gen Magnavox laserdisk for ~$1000. Then a series of long defunct videogame consoles.
      Had to have the new whatever, as soon as it came out.

      Some people do indeed have more money than brains.

    4. Re:not a investment worth making, yet... by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

      You are right in what you say, but neither HD-DVD nor Blu Ray will support 1080p. In fact, your arguments apply equally well to Blu Ray, which adds the following negatives of its own:

      1)Blu Ray DVDs will cost more than HD-DVD.
      2)Blu Ray DVD players will cost even more than HD-DVD players. In fact, as has been discussed on Slashdot, Sony may be losing $600 (!!!) per PS3 just on the cost of the electronics to support Blu Ray.
      3)Blu Ray doesn't support anything right now except MPEG-2. In theory, some other codecs can be supported, but they don't work with Blu Ray right now. In fact, the first Blu Ray DVDs will be good ol' MPEG-2 video and will not use any of the advanced codecs that will work out of the box on HD-DVD. What this means, in terms that Slashdot geeks can understand, is that with the technology as it is today, you can fit _Return Of The King: Expanded Edition_ with all material on one HD-DVD disc. You can't even fit the movie alone on one Blu Ray single layer disc because of the use of the inefficient MPEG-2 codec, which requires very high bitrates for HD. The first Blu Ray discs will be limted to about 2 hours of movie time because they don't have any more efficient codecs working.

      IMHO, I'm not sure consumers anywhere really want to pay extra for either format, but based on what I've read on varios forums, I have to conclude that at least HD-DVD is ready and Blu Ray isn't.

    5. Re:not a investment worth making, yet... by ihaddsl · · Score: 1

      Sure, there aren't many (any?) TV's that can display 1080p natively, but even without that there's a clear improvement in quality viewing at 720p or 1080i over the SD DVD @ 480i/p. Compare HD broadcast movies to your DVD quality and you'll see a large difference.

      I'll definately be looking at these once prices come down and there's a resonable selection of titles available, even though my TV's native res is 720p

    6. Re:not a investment worth making, yet... by m50d · · Score: 1
      "Early adopter" gear has never been for the feint of heart.

      Or even the faint of heart. Spelling macht frei!

      --
      I am trolling
    7. Re:not a investment worth making, yet... by minkie · · Score: 1
      a potentially incompatible format and a worthless future library of media

      Yeah, I know what you mean. I've got a whole wall of vinyl

    8. Re:not a investment worth making, yet... by MyNameIsEarl · · Score: 1
      you're not going to get the help you need at Circuit City, Best Buy, et. al.
      Good luck getting help with anything at Circuit City or Best Buy.
    9. Re:not a investment worth making, yet... by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 1
      They will play HD-DVD's at high res. There's no argument over this.

      Oh yeah? Don't be a sucker.
      the eight-company consortium behind AACS will require hardware makers to include the capability to "downrez" (limit the resolution) of high-definition signals sent from players to TVs via analog connections -- including component video. Downrezzing wouldn't occur automatically, but would be triggered if the player recognized a "downrez flag" (called an Image Constraint Token) on a high-definition movie disc.
      --High-def Disc Update: Where things stand with HD DVD and Blu-ray


      Also, there is *no doubt at all* to anyone who owns an HDTV of any size that DVD's are significantly inferior to broadcast HD programming. When American Idol has a sharper picture than the newest $20 King Kong DVD, something is wrong.

      Oh yeah? I've seen plenty of poorly mastered HD where a high-quality up-scaling of the DVD looked at least as good, if not better. Good quality HD will blow away the best quality DVD, but considering what a haphazard job the studios do with DVD releases, I have no reason to expect BLU-HD-RAY-DVD releases to always be good enough to beat DVD.
    10. Re:not a investment worth making, yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're willing to spend close to $1000 on a DVD player that will be available for half the price in a few months, you probably already have a TV capable of 1080i.

    11. Re:not a investment worth making, yet... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      And lots of major studios are on record as saying they won't make use of that particular flag.

      The industry learned a pretty big lesson when the market rejected the DivX system back in the late 90s.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    12. Re:not a investment worth making, yet... by teal_ · · Score: 1

      As always, the thing that will make this technology catch on and be successful is, of course, pr0n. Imagine what that that kind of resolution will do for the industry! Oh man! Nobody pushes the tech envelope more than pr0n, to this day their product is about the only ones that make use of the multiple angle feature of DVDs (uh, or so I've heard, yea)

      I can't even recall seeing any HD-DVD's anyway. Of course, once this technology catches on, they'll re-relase every movie in HD-DVD thus rendering your current DVD collection obsolete. But what the heck, I don't care, I still watch VHS stuff.

    13. Re:not a investment worth making, yet... by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 1

      And lots of major studios are on record as saying they won't make use of that particular flag.

      No. Some major studios are on record saying that they won't use it INITIALLY - they aren't making any promises. Furthermore, some major studioes are strongly in favor of it, notably Paramount, Universal and Time-Warner.

      So, to re-iterate the point from my first post, contrary to the original poster's claims - yes there is BIG argument over playing HD at HD resolution. All the players support the flag, so any studio is free to force down-rezzing any time they want to.

      (Except in Japan, where it is illegal to down-rez - and since Japan will be in the same "region" as the US, look forward to having to import ridiculously expensive Japanese editions of US films to get them to play in their full resolution. Yeah!)

    14. Re:not a investment worth making, yet... by Stephen+Chadfield · · Score: 1

      Yes, video shot in "soft focus" looks so much better in HD.

    15. Re:not a investment worth making, yet... by DarkEdgeX · · Score: 1

      The "think Beta" argument doesn't work. Beta and VHS were physically different shapes; HD DVD and Blu-ray Disc are physically the same size, so making a "dual format player" is indeed possible (and in fact, has already been announced). HD DVD vs BD is more like DVD-R vs. DVD+R. Eventually burners/players/etc. will just support both.

      FWIW though, I plan on diving in with Blu-ray when it ships in May/June (The Fifth Element should be awesome).

      --
      All I know about Bush is I had a good job when Clinton was president.
    16. Re:not a investment worth making, yet... by 9Nails · · Score: 1
      Quote: I had a friend who bought a 1st gen VCR, for ~$900. The same guy bought a 1st gen Magnavox laserdisk for ~$1000. Then a series of long defunct videogame consoles.
      Had to have the new whatever, as soon as it came out.

      Some people do indeed have more money than brains.

      The question is, will this friend adopt HD-DVD? Or is there any jaded feelings from the past experiences that have seeded some doubt in their mind?

  9. Wha? by njcajun · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "The player will sell for 110,000 yen (US$936) in Japan, which is less than the $800 price tag it will carry in North America." Can someone explain that to me?

    1. Re:Wha? by log0n · · Score: 2, Funny

      $800 is worth more than $936 in Japan ^_^

    2. Re:Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The $800 is just the cost of the price tag itself. The player is an additional sum.

  10. Gee, has anyone else noticed that $800 < $936? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe I'm the first one...

  11. Re:Eh sorry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, it is for unusual values of 800.

  12. Early adopters jump on! by PoderOmega · · Score: 1

    You now too can be the envy of all your friends, and in 3 years you can pull your hair out because TVs will only come with HDMI X-TREME DRM that will be incompatible with your player. Congradulations! Big companies win!

    1. Re:Early adopters jump on! by westlake · · Score: 1
      You now too can be the envy of all your friends, and in 3 years you can pull your hair out because TVs will only come with HDMI X-TREME DRM that will be incompatible with your player.

      DRM is essentially the same in both systems. The only substantial question remaining is that of mandatory managed copy: hard disc backup in high definition, home networking, and related issues.

  13. Re:Wait... by VorpalRodent · · Score: 1
    $936 No, no, no. As is clear from the post, it will sell for (US$936) in Japan. Anyone who has ever taken an accounting class knows that this means -$936. They've realized they've thrown money into a looming format war, and now they're paying people to take them...except for Americans...? And everyone knows that -$936 $800.
    --
    Take it to the limit, everybody to the limit, come on, everybody fhqwhgads.
  14. Be a Beta tester for a cool $1000 by olddotter · · Score: 1

    Hey I can't fault them for trying. If I could get people to beta test my product while paying me $1000 for the honor, I might go back to writing code!

    1. Re:Be a Beta tester for a cool $1000 by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Well, you did want the PS3 to be bug-free, didn't you?

      After all, if people are going to blow up to $2000 on eBay when the PS3 comes out to get it, what's a measly $1000 to beta-test the player?

      Hey, want to buy a used bridge?

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    2. Re:Be a Beta tester for a cool $1000 by xzanthar · · Score: 1

      Or... you could buy one of these, and market it on ebay as a beta ps3

      --
      I encrypt all my files with Double XOR Encryption!
  15. Re:Wait... by drakaan · · Score: 1
    And let me be the first to say that nine-hundred-thirty six dollars is NOT less than...

    Hell, everyone else was doing it.

    --
    "Murphy was an optimist" - O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law
  16. From the article, 500 less than 936 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    From the article, in hopes that it will make the "936 less than 800" issue clearer... somehow.

    "The player will sell for 110,000 yen (US$936) in Japan. In the North American market there will also be a cheaper player, the HD-A1, priced at $500. Toshiba said the price in Japan is based on its expectation that video enthusiasts will be first to adopt the technology, while in the United States, the prices are aimed more at average consumers who are more price conscious."

    1. Re:From the article, 500 less than 936 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is how it reads now, but based on the feedback at the end of the article I suspect that it may have originally contained the quote in the article summary.

  17. Wow, So... yea by theheff · · Score: 1

    Great little buy... I'll just put in my nonexistant HD-DVD movie titles... I'm starting to really like this imagination game.

  18. Re:XBox360? by Azarael · · Score: 2, Informative

    I beleive that in a previous /. article, MS was quoted as saying that an HD-DVD drive would be made available later as an add-on for the 360.

  19. Re:XBox360? by Manmademan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wow, way to be behind the times. The Xbox360 plays standard DVDs only. An add on drive was announced a little while ago that would allow one to play HD-DVD's, but this will never, ever be used for games.

  20. Re:XBox360? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no HD in 360. will be an add on later down the road.

  21. Re:XBox360? by spxero · · Score: 1

    AFAIK, the 360 is including the HD-DVD drive as an add-on accessory when they feel the time is right. It shipped with a standard DVD drive. In other words, yes, it will have HD-DVD support... eventually.

  22. I'll pass... by mr_burns · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...on both HD-DVD and Blu Ray. Holographic storage hits the market within a year with much greater density and throughput. Online movie distro music store style is likely to hit even before then.

    So there's absolutely no point in investing a grand in a technology which will be obsoleted within a year. I'll throw a holo drive in a MythTV, get my movies online legit and tell the consumer electronics manufacturers to suck it.

    --
    "Let him go, Ralph. He knows what he's doing." --Otto Mann (simpsons)
    1. Re:I'll pass... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Holographic storage hits the market within a year with much greater density and throughput.

      You could have said that 5 years ago...

      Three-cheers for Vaporware!

      Online movie distro music store style is likely to hit even before then.

      Nobody is going to wait 20 hours, with their DSL connection maxed-out, to download a single HDTV movie. Online distribution is probably decade off.

      So there's absolutely no point in investing a grand in a technology which will be obsoleted within a year.

      Obviously true, but since you don't have a monopoly on the future, whether or not HD-DVD will catch-on is still up-in-the-air.

      Certainly, if Sony bungles Blu-ray any further, HD-DVD could very easily be *THE* format for the next couple decades (at least).
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  23. Re:Wait... by eggsurplus · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Are you kidding me? This post is redundant? He posted at eactly the same time as the post above which is rated 5:Funny. I can see if it were a few minutes later after the 1,000th person posted their "haha, you can't figure out that $936 is MORE than $800" post.

  24. Price conscious consumer? by the_humeister · · Score: 1
    I don't think so. At those prices, I wouldn't call the target market "price conscious."

    Toshiba said the price in Japan is based on its expectation that video enthusiasts will be first to adopt the technology, while in the United States, the prices are aimed more at average consumers who are more price conscious.


    I, as a real price conscious consumer, would never buy something like this for so much. The cons just greatly outweigh the pros at this point.
  25. early adopters by PMuse · · Score: 0

    component-sized dvd player: $25-50
    hd-dvd player: $800-936

    They don't call it the "bleading edge" of technology for nothing.

    --
    "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    1. Re:early adopters by Limburgher · · Score: 1

      They don't. They actually call it "bleeding edge", but point taken. :)

      --

      You are not the customer.

    2. Re:early adopters by PMuse · · Score: 1

      leading
      bleading
      bleeding

      YMMV :)

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
  26. a new spin on an old joke? by no_opinion · · Score: 3, Funny

    New HD-DVD player: $980
    HD-DVD titles: priceless (there aren't any, yet)
    Not being able to record: priceless
    Owning a player for a soon-to-be dead format: priceless

  27. Your nickname implies by w.p.richardson · · Score: 1
    there should be an "Excellent" at the end of your post.

    My sentiments exactly, FWIW.

    --

    Curb CO2 emissions: Kill yourself today!

    1. Re:Your nickname implies by mr_burns · · Score: 1
      there should be an "Excellent" at the end of your post.

      Exactlyyyyyyyyyyy.... hehehehe

      --
      "Let him go, Ralph. He knows what he's doing." --Otto Mann (simpsons)
  28. toshiba hdxa1 is approaching by digitaldc · · Score: 0

    To quote Luke Skywalker, "Look at the size of that thing."

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:toshiba hdxa1 is approaching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That wasn't Luke, that was Wedge Antilles

    2. Re:toshiba hdxa1 is approaching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That wasn't Luke, that was Wedge Antilles

      Are you sure? I thought that was one of the cut scenes where Luke walked in on Chewbacca taking a shower.

    3. Re:toshiba hdxa1 is approaching by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      No it was the from famous Luke-Han love scene they cut when Burt Reynolds left and they brought in Harrison Ford.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  29. Average Consumer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Toshiba said the price in Japan is based on its expectation that video enthusiasts will be first to adopt the technology, while in the United States, the prices are aimed more at average consumers who are more price conscious

    Since when is $500 an afordable price for the 'average' consumer being that the 'average' consumer still doesn't own an HDTV (thus gets no benefit out of a HD-DVD player)?

    Honestly I hope people reject HD-DVD and Blu-Ray and stick with Progressive scan DVD players for one reason, I'm sick of having to "upgrade" every couple of years so that a entertainment company can re-sell the exact same product in a different format. Maybe I'm the only one but (even though HD is nice) I don't see a big enough improvement in quality to from progressive scan DVD to HD-DVD/Blu-Ray to justify $30-$40 for a movie and $500-$1000 for a player.

  30. Re:Wait... by Bitwaba · · Score: 1

    It appears that the offending line has been changed in TFA

    from the new TFA:
    The player will sell for 110,000 yen (US$936) in Japan. In the North American market there will also be a cheaper player, the HD-A1, priced at $500. Toshiba said the price in Japan is based on its expectation that video enthusiasts will be first to adopt the technology, while in the United States, the prices are aimed more at average consumers who are more price conscious.

  31. Re:Eh sorry? by teshuvah · · Score: 1

    This would have been funny, had you put the correct value ($936) instead of $926. I won't comment on "ti" either. Don't let an attempt at humor get in the way of proofreading.

  32. And yet... by everphilski · · Score: 1, Informative

    Man, the first people who buy these babies are either crazy, stupid

    And yet the people who blew $2500+ on the first run of apple MacBook Pro's werent crazy or stupid, weren't they? Funny how perception changes based on the product and the vendor...

    1. Re:And yet... by StrongAxe · · Score: 1

      And yet the people who blew $2500+ on the first run of apple MacBook Pro's werent crazy or stupid, weren't they? Funny how perception changes based on the product and the vendor...

      More like the based on the added value of the product.

      When you bought a MacBook Pro at launch, how many of the features were usable right out of the box during the first year after launch? But when you buy a HD-DVD, given the lack of media, for the first year, people will essentially have a really expensive box that will only plan normal commercial DVDs (since you can't buy commercial HD-DVDs yet). Much better to wait a year until the media becomes more available and the bugs get worked out, and buy a usable player at half price.

      Even if you need a new DVD player today, it's cheaper to buy a conventional one new, and a year from now throw it away and buy a new HD-DVD one a year from now, than to buy a new HD-DVD one now.

    2. Re:And yet... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, those MacBooks worked just fine out of the box. I fail to see the parallels.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    3. Re:And yet... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Uh huh. Apple has had similar teething problems with a bunch of their products. Again: They work fine out of the box. Are there issues? Of course. Are there a disproportionate number of issues, or as many as I'd guessed there'd be with a brand new processor architecture.

      So, whatever. Had I bought a MacBook, these are the sorts of issues I'd anticipate having.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  33. So that makes the MINIMUM PS3 price... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, if the minimum they can sell an HD-DVD player is $500, and since HD-DVD is a simpler technology than Blu-Ray, that means the absolute MINIMUM price for the PS3 has to be around $800 (since, after all, you still need the console part, and not just the video player). More likely it will be closer to $1000.

    I think we're finally seeing the beginning of the end for the PlayStation. With HD-DVD being available first, the PS3 having the ability to play a different format simply won't be a selling point. Especially since the thing is going to cost upwards of $1000.

    Microsoft's position is starting to look a whole lot better than Sony's - assuming they can ever get the Japanese and Europeans to get past their anti-American product biases.

  34. Where do I plug in my 1GB flash card? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    so I can, um, backup up my music?

    USB is my life, but $980 for a player? my flash card cost me $79 total.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  35. Does not compute by eno2001 · · Score: 1
    Divide by zero. You broke my brain:

    "The player will sell for 110,000 yen (US$936) in Japan, which is less than the $800 price tag it will carry in North America."

    How is $800 MORE than $936?

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  36. less is more, don't you know? by dextromulous · · Score: 1

    Didn't your operating systems teacher ever tell you that `less` is more than `more`?

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: those who divide people into two types and those who don't.
  37. SIgh by mOOzilla · · Score: 0

    Why bother omg its a CD player omg teh omg! Must buy must buy. Really, Im sure it can wait 3 or 4 months.

  38. Oh boy! by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1
    I can't wait to put one of these babies next to my DVD-A and SACD players so that I can experience high-quality video as well as high-quality audio!

    Oh wait... I don't have a DVD-A or SACD player.

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    1. Re:Oh boy! by HolyCrapSCOsux · · Score: 1
      I have an SACD player - simply because I have a Sony DVD player. I don't generally buy CDs, much less SACDs.... besides, It states in the manual that the SACDs can only be output throught the analog jacks on the player. another useless AD conversion step...

      Bleh

      I completely forgot where I was going with this...Never mind.

      --
      0xB315AA8D852DCD3F3DCA578FD2E0BF88
    2. Re:Oh boy! by systemic+chaos · · Score: 1

      ...And neither does anyone else.

  39. Wake me up when ... by chmilar · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Wake me up when:
    1. I can get a player that will play all formats: BD, HD-DVD, DVD-movie, VCD, Audio CD, Divx on ISO/UDF, MPEG-TS on ISO/UDF, and the new Chinese format (EVD).
    2. The DRM scheme has been cracked, so I don't have to worry about getting locked out from media I have purchased.
    3. There is a decent selection of movies, especially foreign/indie/arthouse titles.
    4. It is affordable.
    --
    Reading Slashdot is ruining my spelling and grammar.
    1. Re:Wake me up when ... by MrFlibbs · · Score: 1

      Yes, sir, Mr. Van Winkle! It shouldn't be too long ...

    2. Re:Wake me up when ... by MrRuslan · · Score: 1

      Umm... It's called a computer with TV out dude...

    3. Re:Wake me up when ... by chmilar · · Score: 1

      And which "computer with TV out" supports BD, HD-DVD, and EVD right now?

      --
      Reading Slashdot is ruining my spelling and grammar.
    4. Re:Wake me up when ... by the+chao+goes+mu · · Score: 1

      They all do, you just need to write the software/drivers.

      --
      Boys from the City. Not yet caught by the Whirlwind of Progress. Feed soda pop to the thirsty pigs.
    5. Re:Wake me up when ... by MrRuslan · · Score: 1

      Im sure there will be pleanty of software avaliable for the new formats soon.

    6. Re:Wake me up when ... by chmilar · · Score: 1

      Who is shipping a BD or HD-DVD drive? One that is actually in retail channels? And is the drive affordable?

      You need the device before the "software/drivers" will be of any use.

      And, until the AACS is cracked, your software/drivers will not let you watch a movie. And, there aren't any movies available yet, anyway.

      --
      Reading Slashdot is ruining my spelling and grammar.
    7. Re:Wake me up when ... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      and the new Chinese format (EVD).

      The EVD format is as old as DVDs. It's China's little failed experiment, trying to follow-up the sucess of SVCD.

      Back when it was going to use VP5, it sounded like a good format. Now that they had a contract dispute (read: lawsuit) with On2, they've given-up and just gone for MPEG-2. So, EVD, at best, is no better than DVD, and isn't supported by any players, and is about a decade behind schedule.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  40. HD-AX1 Specifications by Whom99 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Specifications from the Toshiba Web Site: http://www.tacp.toshiba.com/hddvd//

    Video
    -----
    Disc Playback: HD-DVD/HD-DVD-R/DVD/DVD-R/DVD-RAM/DVD-RW/CD/CD-R/C D-RW
    HD Content via HDMI (Disc Native Resolution)
    Video Up-conversion for SD DVD (720P/1080i)
    11-but / 216 MHz Video DAC
    Enhanced Black Level (DIRE /7.5 IRE)
    Letterbox and Pan & Scan Support

    Audio
    -----
    Built-in Dolby Digital, Dolby Digital Plus, DTS, and TDS decoders
    Dolby True HD Compatible (2 channel)
    Four 32-bit Floating Point Processors
    Multi-Channel 24-bit / 192 kHZ Audio DACs
    HDMI Audio Support up to 5.1 LPCM
    5.1 Channel Output
    Dynamic Range Control
    WMA and MP3 playback

    Connections
    -----------
    USB
    HDMI Output
    Colorstream Component Video Outputs
    S-Video Input
    Composite Video (1)
    Coaxial Digital Audio Output
    Optical Digital Audio Output
    RS-232
    Ethernet 10/100

    1. Re:HD-AX1 Specifications by AndreiK · · Score: 1

      What, no DVD+R?

      No thanks, then.

  41. $100 a pop by grumpyman · · Score: 2, Funny

    In 2 years, they'll probably be available for ~$100 at Walmart.

    1. Re:$100 a pop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In 2 years, they'll probably be available for ~$100 at Walmart.

      Yep. So you can pay $800 more for them now and end up paying $33 per month to watch HD discs 2 years earlier. To me, that sounds better than waiting to get it from Wally World (non-price issues aside).

    2. Re:$100 a pop by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      There's always a big price for being a bleeding edge early adopter... The 'coolness' for this "2-yr' period is priceless, yet one has to pray to have more media available for the player during this coolness period, and that the 1st-gen product has 'deficiencies' a lot of times, either because of design overlook, immature manufacturing process, standard change..etc. It's justifiable for some but I just won't spend that much for coolness.

    3. Re:$100 a pop by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Yes, and those $100 Wal-mart HD-DVD players will probably work right up until a few days after the warranty expires...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  42. It will! With...Vista!...uh...Duke Nukem Forever! by rk · · Score: 1

    Oh, nevermind.

  43. But what about the cables? by mOOzilla · · Score: 0

    Must have "Oxygenated gold feather plated hand crafted by nymphs" cables. For analogue YES, for DIGITAL, LAUGH. Why do people insist on stupid cables for digital (SELF CORRECTING) signal cables?

    1. Re:But what about the cables? by u16084 · · Score: 3, Funny

      YOu can Have these regular Cables for $10 or We HIGHLY recommend these here monstercables for $200.00

      --
      -- I Dont Deserve A Sig I Have Bad Karma
    2. Re:But what about the cables? by mOOzilla · · Score: 0

      200! Sign me up! Where do I punch the monkey!

  44. Class action? by michaelmalak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Since Toshiba is the manufacturer of the player, has Toshiba manufactured any "HD Ready" televisions that would render HD-DVDs at a lower resolution due to DRM? If so, once the player reaches the U.S., wouldn't Toshiba be open to a class action lawsuit for false advertising? The argument would of course hinge on whether over-the-air satisfies the advertisement, or whether due to the advent of the VCR three decades ago that playback of prerecorded media is a reasonable consumer expectation.

    1. Re:Class action? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just as in Blu-ray, downsampling of HD content in HD-DVD over component is done by a token bit set on the disc itself, not a feature that will be forced on everyone. It's up to individual distributers to decide to downsample content, or allow it to be fully seen over an analog output.

      Toshiba has no control over it, so why should they be sued? Btw, that lower resolution, is still "High Definition".

  45. Buy it for its future rarity by dpbsmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The sooner the format tanks, the rarer it will be, and the sooner the early units will become valuable.

    Buy it now and put it in your garage next to your jar of mint-condition Susan B. Anthony dollars, your Coleco Adam, and your Gemstar REB-1100 eBook.

    Bound to be worth a fortune; your grandchildren will be so grateful.

    1. Re:Buy it for its future rarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And your limited edition Susan B. Coman Breast Cancer foundation beanie babies. Those are worth a fortune now!

  46. Re:Eh sorry? by The_REAL_DZA · · Score: 2, Funny
    When is the first media due out?

     
    In ten days (that's less than a week!!)
    --


    This space intentionally left (almost) blank.
  47. Let me be the first to say.... by iolaus · · Score: 1

    $800?!? Hahahahahaha!


    I'm sure the average consumer is about as anxious as me to rush out and buy one of these DRM infected piles of shit for just shy of a grand!!

    --
    I find laziness to be an excellent motivator.
  48. Re:Eh sorry? by Mick+Ohrberg · · Score: 1

    Geez, NO humor.

    --

    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.

  49. I grew up on NTSC. by mmell · · Score: 1
    Okay, so HDTV looks somewhat better.

    That said, it sure ain't worth anything remotely like the price I'll need to pay to update my video equipment. There's the television itself, the *VD player and oh, by the way, how do I get my VHS VCR to work with the new HDTV? (I've got a lot of home movies on VHS which I personally couldn't care less about, but my wife'll kill me if I lose 'em!)

    I'm not even going to mention my PC with the ATI All-in-wonder TV card in it. Well, since I just did, yes I will. How 'bout TiVO? All those M$ Multimedia PC's that're being sold even as I type?

    This looks less and less like the VHS-Betamax or audiotape-CD situation, and more and more like the US effort to convert to metric - it seems like a big step forward and a good idea until you actually try to do it. Incidentally, I still drink beer in pints, drive in miles per hour (for some number of miles), I stand just under six feet tall and weigh (a small amount) more than two-hundred pounds (before I get flamed, I'm fully conversant with the metric system).

    Blu-ray and DVD-HD both sound like fine propositions, until you realize how much collateral technology has to be upgraded/scrapped/replaced to get that (IMHO) somewhat superior picture reproduction. Me and my old NTSC? I find that if the material is interesting enough, I don't even notice that the video quality delivered to my home is considerably lower than NTSC (typically, expect 250-300 lines of resolution due to signal degradation, etc., VHS is even worse. Unless you're watching a monitor in a soundstage in Hollywood, you ain't gettin' everything). While there are technologies which can deliver all the resolution of whatever video standard is in place (think: digital), the fact of the matter is that the overwhelming majority of viewers in the United States are watching analog signals (BTW, the local cable company digitizing their analog feeds to pump them to set-top digital receivers doesn't count).

    1. Re:I grew up on NTSC. by shawb · · Score: 1

      Pretty much anybody who is in the market for this will have a home theater reciever which has the ability to take multiple input sources. People who aren't enough of an audiophile to care about Dolby 7.1 or whatever to get a reciever probably are not the intended demographic.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    2. Re:I grew up on NTSC. by freeweed · · Score: 1

      how do I get my VHS VCR to work with the new HDTV?

      You plug it into the composite video/s-video and audio jacks, just like we've been doing with regular TVs for over 2 decades.

      Yeesh, are people seriously this ignorant about technology?

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  50. What have they done?!?! by anti-human+1 · · Score: 1

    My old 6100 Performa? Is that you? Mirage?

    Finally I'll be able to keep a pizza on my DVD player and not worry about it falling off when I try to take a piece!

  51. Or you can wait for $34.77 at Walmart by Secrity · · Score: 1

    You forgot the three year mark: $34.77 at Walmart or your local drugstore.

    1. Re:Or you can wait for $34.77 at Walmart by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      no that's around 5 years out - unless the format fails, in which case you're right, it clocks out around 3 years.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  52. But will it play... by wembley · · Score: 1

    ...my square watermelon?

    --

    Share and Enjoy!

  53. whats the point by memnon · · Score: 0

    whats the point in buying now when there is now hd media out for a good few months, price will prolly be down to half by the time the media is out.

  54. Straight to HD by i_am_the_r00t · · Score: 1

    Theaters have become irrelevent. Was anyone else summarily discgusted with the "see it on the bigscreen" propaganda at the Oscars? pathetic. BTW, I watched that pathetic display on 108 inches of Hi-Def, projected, 5.1 Surround Sweetness and it actually brought a tear to my eye.

  55. Post rejected... by Reemi · · Score: 1

    ...md5-hash not correct.

  56. Uh oh... by reverend_rodger · · Score: 0

    Can you hear that? That's the sound of thousands of angry "Back in the good ole days of Slashdot, editors did their job!" /.'ers and math nerds furiously typing to bitch and complain about the error in the article.

  57. I was an early adopter on DVD, but not this... by Darth+Maul · · Score: 1


    I bought a Sony DVD player in 1997 for $1000.

    But there is no way I would touch this new HD-DVD/Blu-ray hardware with a ten-foot cattle prod. Let's see.... Can't play HD on my Sony HDTV (no HDCP, oh well!), The Man just wants to further restrict my fair use, and the benefits of the format change are ZERO from a practical standpoint (form factor, no rewinding, etc that made change from VHS to DVD so obvious).

    --
    --- witty signature
  58. Think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The PS3 will be sold below cost.

    1. Re:Think by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      And it'll be made in significantly larger numbers (millions as opposed to tens or hundreds of thousands) which reduces the price right there.

      Even if the PS3 won't be sold at loss, this thing has a big profit margin added. The PS3 won't.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  59. Score +1 for DRM by Dylan+Knight+Rogers · · Score: 0

    Score +1 for DRM, FSF 0. Damn, this sucks. Boycott DRM and HD-DVD! http://writersblocklive.com/boycott/

  60. Think Yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To get the PS3 to a reasonable price, assuming it's $800 to make, they'll have to be taking a $500 loss on each console sold. Actually, more like $750 when you factor in things like shipping and storing and related expenses.

    There's no way they can sell it at that large a loss, unless they're going to be bundling the systems with 20 games a piece.

    Sony is flat-out screwed. If they sell them at enough of a lost to make them marketable, they'll almost certainly be sued for anti-trust violation (and, not being an American company, you can bet they'll be made to pay). Selling it at a loss won't save Sony - their only way out is to actually bring the costs down.

    1. Re:Think Yourself by nasch · · Score: 1

      It's not likely there would be any successful price dumping complaint/lawsuit for selling in a similar price range to XBox 360, unless perhaps they sold it for far more in Japan.

  61. Media by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    Is there any media for this at all? If not any actual films, I hope at least there's a demo disc or something to show off the 1080 lines of resolution.

  62. Can't believe these were omitted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. I for one welcome our oversized high definition overlords
    2. But does it run linux?

    and, I suppose:

    3. I would love to see a beowulf cluster of these

    Why is everyone slacking off? We need our boring, overused tag lines!

  63. combo players by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LG kills blu-ray model and considers combo player

    from TFA: "..could be available as early as the fall."

    My hard-earned will probably land on one of these. Combo drives are quickly becoming inevitable, will be interesting to see how prominent they are in the first-gen series of players.

  64. In soviet russia... by MarkVVV · · Score: 2, Funny

    $800 > $936

  65. Not worth it by Brix+Braxton · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Thinking about this the other day - I looked over my DVD collection and made a mental note of how many times I watched each of the movies I paid for. My logic was that I would have to watch most movies more than 4 times to really benefit from ownership (guessing I pay about $20 per DVD). In the end - my entire collection was a loss - most of my movies I haven't watched more than twice - not that I don't like them, I do - but there are so many other things to watch between the Tivo and DVD that it's not possible. Using this logic - $900 for an HDDVD player = I could watch 225 HDTV movies via PPV or On Demand before it even became a consideration - not to mention all of the content I would get on Showtime or HBO HD. I know ownershp has it's merits but I think I'm ready to kick the habit and leave the spot empty on my home theatre rack. Just my opinion.

    --
    www.wildpad.com
  66. Duh! Less is MORE! by The_REAL_DZA · · Score: 1

    {grin}

    --


    This space intentionally left (almost) blank.
  67. Can't we all just get along? by panic911 · · Score: 1

    How hard could it be to create a player that has BluRay and HD-DVD support built into one? It would probably need two lasers and two decoders but seriously, how hard could that be? It seems like if every player had support for both, the issue of BluRay vs HD-DVD would be moot. It would be up to the studios to decide which format they use, but the consumer wouldn't even need to know the difference. With a universal player, you wouldn't even have to know which disk format you have and since the disks look the same (unlike BetaMax vs VHS) there will be no confusion.

    1. Re:Can't we all just get along? by Brix+Braxton · · Score: 1

      I doubt that the issues are technical. All of the interested parties have something to gain from their format winning so they aren't going to cancel themselves out by putting out a "do-it-all".

      --
      www.wildpad.com
  68. That should be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rechtschreibung macht frei.

  69. Thats good... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    That's good because those DVDAs spread you open like a Thanksgiving turky.

  70. Boycott HD-DVD by billybob · · Score: 1
    --
    Joseph?
  71. HD over analog component for Japanese players? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to various sites, eg. http://neasia.nikkeibp.com/neasia/003549 ,
    Japanese players will not limit HD output over component cables. There is
    supposedly also Japanese legislation banning this.
    Anyone have any info about this?

  72. Re:Duh! Less is MORE! by Rod+Beauvex · · Score: 0

    Cha cha cha, Charmin!

  73. What about the PS3? by LostPants · · Score: 1

    The PS3's games are all going to use blu-ray discs. If the format tanks, does that mean my days of playing Metal Gear Solid will be over or will interactive media be entirely unaffected?

  74. Yes, I believe they have... by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    But I don't see how they would be open to a lawsuit.

    The TV displays content input just fine.

    The HD-DVD player just may refuse to output full res sometimes. It probably mentions this in the manual (oh god I hope it doesn't have a EULA!).

    It's not a fault of the TV, I don't see the basis of the lawsuit.

    Besides, at the time these TVs were sold, there was no such thing as an HD-DVD player. It all was OTA HD and W-VHS. So I'm not sure the user has any expectation that it will work perfectly with all future devices.

    Not that I like this downrezzing crap, I just don't like exploratory lawsuits either.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  75. What I was trying to get at was . . . by mmell · · Score: 1

    "So this'll make my VHS tapes HDTV? How come they don't look or sound better?"