Slashdot Mirror


G4 Moves Further From Technology Roots

Variety has a piece detailing some new hires at G4, all designed to further move the channel away from its technology roots. From the article: "One of Finn's priorities will be to scout people to profile when 'Icons' relaunches this summer. The 'Biography'-style skeinskein has been revamped to focus on figures that appeal to young men, including J.J. Abrams and Bryan SingerBryan Singer. She'll also continue to strengthen the lineup of guests visiting G4's live, studio-based series. In addition, both 'Filter' and 'Attack of the Show' will be relaunched in June with a scaled-back focus on technology. Heavier emphasis will be on attitude, humor and a broader range of male-oriented topics."

129 comments

  1. G4 Moves Further into Crap TV channel by pbaumgar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is there any reason to watch this channel anymore...?

    1. Re:G4 Moves Further into Crap TV channel by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      star trek..

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    2. Re:G4 Moves Further into Crap TV channel by rcamera · · Score: 1

      1) olivia munn
      2) kristin holt
      3) star trek: tng
      4) e3

      --
      Wave upon wave of demented avengers March cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream
    3. Re:G4 Moves Further into Crap TV channel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I liked that show where it was just 30 minutes of game demos, but I haven't seen it in a while. Is it still on? That's pretty much it. The "adult themed" version that was on in the evenings fucking sucked, however.

    4. Re:G4 Moves Further into Crap TV channel by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      When wasn't it. When I had cable that was one of the channels that I regularly never watched because nothing good was on it and I didn't care to watch other people play Quake.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:G4 Moves Further into Crap TV channel by reachums · · Score: 1

      that was Cinematech, here is the Schedule http://www.g4tv.com/cinematech/schedule/index.html

      --
      "Just call me Girly Blank"
    6. Re:G4 Moves Further into Crap TV channel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When my cable provider switched up the channels they, thankfully removed G4 and replaced it with the Science Channel. Doesn't take away from me missing old school Tech TV.

    7. Re:G4 Moves Further into Crap TV channel by nb+caffeine · · Score: 1

      Xplay is now only decent, when it used to be good. everything else (that they create) licks balls. Attack of the show is the worst. Blech. Ive watched it. Every time, I find whatever is on the underside of my shoes to be less irritating and more interesting.

      --

      "Something's wrong with you...and I hope we never do meet again." - Deftones When Girls Telephone Boys
    8. Re:G4 Moves Further into Crap TV channel by vandon · · Score: 1

      Wow, I think we've found the one item that Windows, Linux, Mac, BSD, and VMS users can agree on.
      Mon-Wed there are the only days I watch G4/TechTV because that's when the new X-Plays are on. Thurs-Sun, I can't think of anything worth watching on that channel.

    9. Re:G4 Moves Further into Crap TV channel by Dance_Dance_Karnov · · Score: 1

      fucking truth, 3 eps of TNG a day. although the Trek 2.0....I watched "The Cage", it was awful, if they just played TOS that would be fine, but no they have to make it TOS-XTREEM!

    10. Re:G4 Moves Further into Crap TV channel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      What, no Morgan Webb? "I'm surrounded by blown Kha'ak but strangely unsatisfied."

    11. Re:G4 Moves Further into Crap TV channel by szyzyg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      XPlay is frequently so good that my non-gamer wife enjoys watching some of the reviews and Sketches, the reveiws are brutally honest and frequently remind her that she isn't missing much by not playing games other than DDR.

    12. Re:G4 Moves Further into Crap TV channel by CaptCommy · · Score: 1

      X-play is only good as a comedy show. They know very little about good games IMO. They're funny as hell when they rip apart a bad game, but when they get a good game, all they can do is come up with those totally off-topic and retarted sketches to try to force some laughs. But they're never funny. I watch the show when I need a laugh, but I would never trust it for a serious game review.

    13. Re:G4 Moves Further into Crap TV channel by nb+caffeine · · Score: 1

      That was what I was getting at when I said it is now only decent. They used to have decent reviews. Not so much anymore. Get rid of the sketches, show more games.

      g4 is dead to me otherwise (and since i dont subscribe to the channel, they dont get any of my money)

      --

      "Something's wrong with you...and I hope we never do meet again." - Deftones When Girls Telephone Boys
    14. Re:G4 Moves Further into Crap TV channel by SyncNine · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That was Cinematech. I believe they show both Cinematech *and* Cinematech: Nocturnal Emissions now. Neither are really as good as the old shows were.

      When G4 merged with TechTV (I miss Patrick and Leo!) and ditched The Screen Savers, Unscrewed, and Eye Drops, I knew that the station was going downhill. And yes, I know they -changed- The Screen Savers into 'Attack of the Most Boring, Stupid, Waste of Time and Oxygen, Idiot Hour, for Idiots, Run by a bunch of Kids instead of Patrick and Leo', before anyone tells me. Maybe I'm just bitter. ;)

      Don't they play 'The Man Show' on G4 now? Give me a break.

      What they don't understand is that we ALREADY have 'SpikeTV', and honestly, it's a really f'ing stupid tv network (except for MXC). We DON'T need another one.

      PS. Martin Sargent is one of the funniest people in the entire world, someone needs to pick him up for a similar show. If you missed Unscrewed ... You missed one of the greatest shows ever to grace the airwaves with its presence.

      --
      To the darkened skies once more, and ever onward.
    15. Re:G4 Moves Further into Crap TV channel by GmAz · · Score: 1

      I agree. I subscribe to the Dish Network Top 120 channels just so I could get TechTV. Now, I have no use for the Top120 since G4 took over. Its crap. Attack of the Show has its moments, but rarely. I do like that Star Trek: TNG is on there because it reduces the number of times I have to see The Man Show, or Street Fury or any other crappy show on that channel. Its sad, and yes, I miss Leo and Patrick too. Everything they talked about I already know, but it was nice to see a show that helped people and even refreshed my mind once in a while. XPlay is getting crappy too. Too many freaking skits and not enough reviews. I did however see the show Call for Help with Leo Laport on there about a month ago at like 5:30 am (my baby woke me up) and was happy. Not sure if it was a repeat or not, but he was on. But yes, as soon as my contract ends, I will be removing the Top 120 and going to the Top 60 since TechTV was my only reason for getting the Top 120.

      --
      Click Click Bloody Click PANCAKES!
    16. Re:G4 Moves Further into Crap TV channel by badasscat · · Score: 1

      X-play is only good as a comedy show. They know very little about good games IMO.

      They know very little about comedy, if you ask me. Their inane little high school skits grate on me like fingernails on a blackboard - they think they're being ironically low-budget funny, but then so does every other teenager with a camcorder. The truth is being an intern on a cable TV show doesn't automatically qualify you as undiscovered talent.

      Morgan and Adam are still good hosts, although they've both become a bit too jaded at this point - Morgan especially. I actually look forward to those little moments that happen every couple shows where Morgan gets off-script - when she genuinely laughs at something she wasn't expecting (usually something Adam says or does) or improvs a line that she obviously hadn't practiced beforehand. That's the "old" Morgan Webb that we all knew and loved from the TechTV days. But generally, she just sticks to her all-too-cynical script.

      The rest of the "cast" of this show, though, are all just a bunch of wanna-be fratboy rejects, and it hurts my eyes to watch them. Unfortunately, about 20 of the 22 minutes of each new episode these days seems to be taken up by these lame skits, with games almost an afterthought. Which kind of fits in with what's going on at the rest of the channel, making me wonder if this is not a conscious (and possibly forced) change.

    17. Re:G4 Moves Further into Crap TV channel by Deathlizard · · Score: 1

      If you like what SpikeTV was three years ago, then Yes.

      They just got Bonzai, Which bombed big time on Spike. they're Showing Star Trek now. At the rate their going, I'll give it a few more weeks and they'll be showing Starsky and Hutch and Most Extreme Elimination Challenge reruns.

      I dont Get what their thinking about there. First it was Videogames, then it was Videogames and Computers when they Got TechTV, now apparently, it's the second network for men.

    18. Re:G4 Moves Further into Crap TV channel by Bloomy · · Score: 2, Informative

      They run TOS with none of their bells and whistles on Saturdays, from 9am to 4pm. It's "uncut", each episode runs in a 70 minute block so they don't have to cut down on commercial time per hour.

    19. Re:G4 Moves Further into Crap TV channel by Dance_Dance_Karnov · · Score: 1

      sweet, I was unaware of this.

    20. Re:G4 Moves Further into Crap TV channel by lion2 · · Score: 1

      I can't believe I complained to TimeWarner when they removed TechTV from their channels because of the Comcast aquisition. If I knew it was gonna turn into this piece of crap channel I wouldn't have wasted my time. They took an excellent Tech channel and turned it into a boring video game channel and now they want to become SpikeTV?!!!!

    21. Re:G4 Moves Further into Crap TV channel by oneils · · Score: 1

      In Canada, we don't see Star Trek on G4 Tech TV - but, we also don't see the Man Show. We mainly see Call For Help with Leo Laporte (produced in Canada), AOTS, X-PLAY, Torrent, Electric Playground, Reviews on the Run, and Cinematech. It's not too bad, I mainly watch the game review shows and call for help.

  2. Balance by PoderOmega · · Score: 4, Informative

    I thought AotS was a perfect balance, and it is the only show I watch on G4 regularly. If it turns into Maxim magazine on TV then I will be very disapointed. I catch Icons occiationly, but that's it. Are they trying to be like SpikeTV? I don't watch that channel either.

    1. Re:Balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It basically sounds like they are trying to make all their shows exactly like "X-Play". Instead of having the diversity to attract various demographics they are instead focusing on one particular demographic and beating it senseless.

    2. Re:Balance by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1
      If it turns into Maxim magazine on TV then I will be very disapointed...Are they trying to be like SpikeTV?

      Yes. This was apparent from the time Comcast bought TechTV from Ziff-Davis Publishing. The network was much better under ZD's control...

      --
      Help us build a better map!
    3. Re:Balance by XdevXnull · · Score: 1

      The only time I ever watch Spike is for syndicated eps of ST:TNG. Occaisionally a room mate will put on Takeshi no Chousenjou (MXC in america). The only thing I liked about that show was seeing Beat Takeshi, the Japanese version of Sammy L Jackson, on such a ridiculous program.

      --
      "I'm a Laver, not a Phyto[plankton]"
    4. Re:Balance by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1

      If I had cable, the only things I'd really consider watching on Spike would be re-runs of ST:TNG and DS9, and maybe TNA Impact)

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    5. Re:Balance by Starsmore · · Score: 1
      Call me ignorant, but which one is Beat Takeshi?

      I know the name, but for the life of me I can't put a face to it.

      --
      "If Common Sense was so common, it wouldn't be such a valued trait."
    6. Re:Balance by XdevXnull · · Score: 1

      He's the one with the rounder face.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beat_Takeshi
      If he's writing or directing, he's usually credited by his real name, Takeshi Kitano. Seriously, watch his films.

      --
      "I'm a Laver, not a Phyto[plankton]"
  3. sucks by reachums · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, that sucks. The whole reason I liked watching G4 was the Tech stuff. When they added Star Trek, I didn't mind. I like Star Trek, and if you stretch your logic it is kind of about technology as well. But the Man Show, Street Furry, Triumph the Insult Comic Dog, none of those are really about tech. I guess you could make an argument about Street Furry being about Car technology, but I digress.

    There are in fact women who watch G4, and they are totally leaving us out. We don't want to watch the Man Show (for obvious reasons), I want to watch shows that focus on Technology and Gaming. I want to have guests that all Geeks can enjoy, male or female, young or old. I want Icons to tell me about Tech/Geek icons, not male icons.

    Wasn't Spike TV supposed to be the Chanel for men?

    --
    "Just call me Girly Blank"
    1. Re:sucks by almostmanda · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is just another effort to get the young men back into watching TV. The 18-24 males have pretty much disappeared as far as ratings by demographic go. I guess the G4 higher-ups realized that talking about video games and the internet all the time is counter-productive when they're trying to lure men AWAY from those forms of entertainment.

    2. Re:sucks by Programmer_In_Traini · · Score: 1

      Please mod that parent up!

      I'm so annoyed at what G4 became ... and is becoming even more. SpikeTV already requires a very low IQ to remotely appreciate and it seems G4 now wants to appeal to the same public.

      Are they trying to tell us they think gamers/techies have low IQs, that we like shows filled with cliches and pop crap ?

      OK, so now we need a new tech tv, where we'll be able to watch... tech stuff because I really don't care about jessica alba's latest iPod!

      --
      If you look like your passport photo, you're too ill to travel. - Will Kommen
    3. Re:sucks by linzeal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is insightful as all heck. Out of my dozen of so friends the only ones that still watch TV the 3-4 hours a day, like most demographics; either are complete losers or have children whom they supervise when watching. I myself will be going on 6 years without cable TV soon and the only show I watch is Lost, which I download.

    4. Re:sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Wasn't Spike TV supposed to be the channel for men?"

      What, we only get one? You guys have Lifetime, that Oprah channel, and that other one whose name escapes me at the moment.

    5. Re:sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...Street Furry...

      Oh gosh, they're letting Furries roam wild on the streets now?

    6. Re:sucks by toad3k · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I never really thought about it, but a lot of the people I know in that age bracket indeed do not watch tv anymore.

      I wonder what happened. The internet I guess.

    7. Re:sucks by mypalmike · · Score: 1

      "Wasn't Spike TV supposed to be the channel for men?"

      What, we only get one? You guys have Lifetime, that Oprah channel, and that other one whose name escapes me at the moment.


      I think you are referring to the Estrogen channel.

      --
      There are 0x40000000 types of people: those who understand 32-bit IEEE 754 floating point, and those who don't.
    8. Re:sucks by plover · · Score: 0
      Are they trying to tell us they think gamers/techies have low IQs, that we like shows filled with cliches and pop crap ?

      It's a trap!

      Sorry, I couldn't help myself. Really. Kinda like Tourette's, only with fark.com images stuck in my brain.

      --
      John
    9. Re:sucks by reachums · · Score: 1

      Hey, I don't watch any of the channels for women either, I think they suck. I would rather watch Star Trek: NG, DS9, and MXE on Spike than anything on the "women" channels. But then again I am a tech girl and we tend to not like sappy movies and tragic love stories. I much prefer to watch crazy Japanese people in red helmets!

      --
      "Just call me Girly Blank"
    10. Re:sucks by irablum · · Score: 1

      MXE rocks!!!!! we want more people attempting to swing on ropes onto platforms, missing, and falling into puddles!

      (not tomention the whole velcro suit thing)

      Ira

    11. Re:sucks by Newander · · Score: 1

      Don't forget WE

      --

      Jesus saves and takes half damage.

    12. Re:sucks by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      And you are insightful as all heck, too. The only reason I still have cable is due to using cable for my interweb connection. I tend to download most shows I'm interested in - this is 2006, TV should work around my schedule, not the other way around.

      The saddest part is that my cable company recently did...something. Going on over 4 months now, there are still several channels where the sound is badly out of sync. You can also expect (no matter which channel you're on), a "burp" every hour or so, where the picture freezes for 2 seconds, the sound cuts out, then it comes back on. Compared to all that, the stuff I download is of better picture quality and reliabilty. Sad sad sad.

      I will admit that it is useful for watching Adult Swim in bed for a bit before going to sleep, though.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    13. Re:sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Four million female-oriented teen dramas, cop/court shows, and American Idol happened. What am I supposed to watch, CSI, American Idol, or Gilmore Girls? I watch Good Eats, some Adult Swim programs, and The Daily Show. I catch an episode of Wonder Showzen here and there. If I didn't have a TiVo I wouldn't even watch TV.

    14. Re:sucks by drachenstern · · Score: 1
      Don't forget WE
      Don't forget LMN either. I swear there are at least 50 channels on DirecTV (and other networks too, but guess who my provider is) geared directly towards women, and about 3 geared towards men.

      But to be frank*, I watch more Discovery and Science and a little splash of ComCen (FNSU) than ever watching even MXE or COPS

      *and stop calling me shirley
      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    15. Re:sucks by bitter+oblivion · · Score: 1

      If they're trying to get young men to watch tv again, they're doing a horrible job. G4 was all I watched when it first started and now I hardly even watch that. It won't be long before I stop watching altogether.

  4. Bryan SingerBryan Singer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is this one of those Little Caesar's commercials?

    Pizza Pizza!

  5. Good Riddance by MudButt · · Score: 4, Informative

    I, for one, ditched G4 right after they killed TechTV. IMHO, Leo and Patrick and Kevin have much better and creative shows now. (Uh, minus Martin Sargent, who's a tool).

    1. Re:Good Riddance by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      (Uh, minus Martin Sargent, who's a tool)

      Hey, I like Infected. It appeals to a certain taste of warped humor.

      I agree about Leo, Patrick, et. al. Their podcasts and videocasts are much better than anything that's been on G4 in a long time.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:Good Riddance by realilskater · · Score: 1

      I agree. When Comcast bought TechTV they killed it. I watched TechTV far more often than I watch G4. The only show I watch on G4 is Brainiac. Nothing is better than blowing things up and doing a little science along the way.

    3. Re:Good Riddance by Wylfing · · Score: 1
      I, for one, ditched G4 right after they killed TechTV. IMHO, Leo and Patrick and Kevin have much better and creative shows now. (Uh, minus Martin Sargent, who's a tool).

      Yeah, isn't it great that G4 bought TechTV so that they could...um...not air tech shows anymore?

      --
      Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it.
  6. stupid by pezpunk · · Score: 0, Redundant

    stupid stupid stupid stupid.

    --
    i could live a little longer in this prison
  7. Targeted programming by Golias · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Targeted programming pretty much always sucks.

    Good shows might appeal more to one demographic than another, but a good show is a good show.

    For example, you can make a show like "Gilmour Girls" and 30-something women will like it more than most other folks, resulting in a "cult hit" within that demographic, and TV people love it when that happens, because it makes selling ad time easier... but if you get a bunch of executives to say "we need to find a show that hits the Gilmour Girls market", that show will almost certainly be a complete train wreck, because they are not setting out to make a good show that will happen to click with certain people, but setting out to click with those people and the need for it to be good is a distant second.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    1. Re:Targeted programming by MudButt · · Score: 1

      I agree to a point. Targeting a Gilmore Girls audience is way too specific. But do you really believe a Tech audience is just as slim? I think there's a HUGE market for a true tech channel.

      TechTV was steadily growing in viewers and sponsorship while G4 was steadily declining. Viacom bought TechTV JUST for its viewers, not for the shows. That's why Call For Help, The Screen Savers, Fresh Gear, etc. were phased out. G4 is back on the decline now that TechTV viewers are getting sick of Sarah Lane et al.

    2. Re:Targeted programming by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, Sarah Lane left AoTS and the network a couple weeks ago to get married and travel around the world. The last surviving Screen Saver alum is now gone from G4.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    3. Re:Targeted programming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least we have Morgan Webb to look at on X-Play (she's a Screen Saver's alum too moved on)! Adam is a mildly cool dork, and Morgan is well... a teenager gamer geek's wet dream.

  8. Same story with Cartoon Network by thedogcow · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yeah, I've noticed program changes with Adult Swim. Someone tell me why they are showing "Saved by the Bell" on Adult Swim?

    --
    Yes! I listen to NYC Speedcore and do math at 3AM. I suggest you try it too.
    1. Re:Same story with Cartoon Network by vandon · · Score: 1

      Because everyone knows that a '80s TV-G show belongs on late night 'Adult Swim'

    2. Re:Same story with Cartoon Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Survey says that Alyssa Milano's later career choices are attracting an unexpected crowd to her earlier work...

    3. Re:Same story with Cartoon Network by ronfar · · Score: 1
      Because everyone knows that a '80s TV-G show belongs on late night 'Adult Swim'
      That reminds me of the following from a book review I read once...

      All of which might lend Klosterman some pathos if he didn't brag so much about his heterosexual conquests and quasi-cynical manipulation of scores of alleged girlfriends. More disturbing are his obsessions with teen and pre-teen pop culture, as exemplified by a creepy essay on Saved by the Bell -- I HAVE FOUND the metaphor for everything vile in my generation, and its name is Chuck Klosterman by Mark Ames
      First they start showing live action movies like Dumb and Dumber.

      Now they are doing a two week trial of.... shudder... Saved by the Bell during their Adult Swim Block: Adult Swim 'Saved by the Bell' (note creepy Saved by the Bell homo-erotic image used to advertise the show...)

      I wonder how long before they change it to the 'C'-Network or something to de-emphasize cartoons..

      Well, at least I have one more season of Venture Brothers to look forward too until they pull the plug....

      It's sad though... I saw so many shows I would have missed out on because of Cartoon Network, like the great series Paranoia Agent... I'll just have to pay more attention to the Internet from now on...

      --
      All the creatures will die, And all the things will be broken. That's the law of samurai. (Jubai, 1605)
    4. Re:Same story with Cartoon Network by shawb · · Score: 1

      My guess is that saved by the bell was watched by the vast majority of people who watch adult swim. Cartoon Network probably got a very good deal on the rights to it, and figured "hey, why not?" My guess is that it's similar to how I think the whole Adult Swim thing started anyways... They were given a good deal on the rights to mix up a lot of the old Hanna Barbara cartoons and played around with it a bit on Space Ghost Coast to Coast. The show proved to be a huge hit to a demographic that has been steadilly losing viewers (18-24 year old males, same as tech tv. There's my nod to being on topic.) So, they decided to set up a whole block of shows based mostly on ripping old Hanna Barbara shows apart and applying non-sequetors and uncomfortable pauses. Aqua Teen Hunger Force was also created which is the same in concept and humor style as the old HB rips (Sealab 2021, Harvey Birdman Attorney at Law, Brak Show and so on) except it uses original characters rather than the old ones.

      After a bit they started adding more cartoons designed to appeal to 18-24 year old males and were then able to stretch it from one night a week to most nights of the week.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    5. Re:Same story with Cartoon Network by Picticon · · Score: 1

      I'd rather watch Saved by the Bell than some of the DRECK that Adult Swim has showed recently. Tom Goes to the Mayor and 40 oz Mouse are two of the 100% crap shows that come to mind.

      I watched Saved by the Bell when they originally aired years ago... and it's nostalgia to me. And from what I understand, it's only a two week run.

    6. Re:Same story with Cartoon Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      > Someone tell me why they are showing "Saved by the Bell" on Adult Swim?

      3 words:

      College drinking games.

    7. Re:Same story with Cartoon Network by blueZhift · · Score: 1

      Nostalgia.

      Ahh nothing like stoking those jailbait fantasies I suppose... It's fun to catch a couple of these for nostalgia's sake, but I sure hope they won't make a habit of this sort of thing. I watch Adult Swim for two reasons, anime, and the crazy wacked out comedy animated series. I don't want to see any live action. Oh and those homoerotic Burger King ads are totally creeping me out. They did something similar promoting Lord of the Rings too.

    8. Re:Same story with Cartoon Network by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've noticed program changes with Adult Swim. Someone tell me why they are showing "Saved by the Bell" on Adult Swim?

      I don't know. I hated the show growing up and I hate it now.

      I watch adult swim for the Anime, Boondocks, and ATHF... I wouldn't mind live action, but it would have to be adult swim like.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    9. Re:Same story with Cartoon Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saved by the Bell was shitty when it originally aired. I watched it too when I was a kid, but that doesn't mean it was good or that I want to watch it now. 40oz Mouse and Tom Goes to the Mayor are shitty, too, but that doesn't mean "hey, pile on some more shit."

      ATHF, Harvey Birdman, Sealab, Futurama, Robot Chicken, Family Guy, and Boondocks are all decent assets. I even sort of liked Case Closed. While I don't care for it, there's some clear artistic/storytelling value in that Full Metal Alchemist show. Saved by the Bell isn't a cartoon, so it doesn't even belong on Cartoon Network. It's a shitty teen sitcom. Its acting and writing was atrocious.
      Yes, Robot Chicken isn't a cartoon, but it is stop-action animation. That's close-enough for me. No, Zack calling a "time out" isn't close-enough for me.

    10. Re:Same story with Cartoon Network by Dance_Dance_Karnov · · Score: 2, Funny

      I want to know how much they bought 'Tom' for, because if they will buy that shit, I think i just found step 2.

    11. Re:Same story with Cartoon Network by menace3society · · Score: 1

      To be more precise, Adult Swim was joined from the Hanna-Barbara mash-ups (of which Space Ghost Coast-to-Coast was an early precursor) and the Late-night Toonami block (Toonami actually started out, in the beginning, resyndicating things that had already been on US TV, like Thundercats and I think Sailor Moon, and a bunch of 60s H-B superhero shorts in between; only later Toonami moved to an all-anime format). But the guys who created Sealab 2021 actually pitched it twice, but the first time Cartoon Network didn't really have a place for it. The second time, they made a place for it, which ended up swallowing the late-night Toonami whole (including the anime aspect). Then they continued to pick up out-of-syndication 'toons to add to their lineup, and most recently bought the rights to the Boondocks series that Fox decided not to go with.

      I'd like to see them pick up some of the early-90s MTV Liquid Television stuff, that shit was OUT THERE.

    12. Re:Same story with Cartoon Network by ronfar · · Score: 1
      They could put on some of the live action shows based on Anime...

      Well, OK, most of those are inappropriate for television (as were the Anime they were based on). I'm guessing there must be some out there besides La Blue Girl, though...

      --
      All the creatures will die, And all the things will be broken. That's the law of samurai. (Jubai, 1605)
    13. Re:Same story with Cartoon Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My guess is that it's similar to how I think the whole Adult Swim thing started anyways...

      Adult Swim started with Cowboy Bebop (chock full of somewhat realistic blood and violence), not any of the in-house productions.

    14. Re:Same story with Cartoon Network by lewp · · Score: 1
      Cartoon Network probably got a very good deal on the rights to it, and figured "hey, why not?"

      Turner Broadcasting (CN's parent) has aired SbtB for years on TBS in the morning and early afternoon, and I think they can do whatever the hell they want with it. It's basically the reverse of what happened with Family Guy, which aired on AS and now shows up at different times on TBS.

      --
      Game... blouses.
    15. Re:Same story with Cartoon Network by ronfar · · Score: 1
      That's a really bad use of the offtopic mod that was used with the parent post. How is it off topic to note that what's happening with G4 is part of a general trend against narrowcasting?

      Well, hopefully it will be fixed in metamoderation.

      --
      All the creatures will die, And all the things will be broken. That's the law of samurai. (Jubai, 1605)
    16. Re:Same story with Cartoon Network by rabbot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You guys are going to hate me...but I was so excited to hear they were bringing Saved by the Bell to Adult Swim. I loved the show when I was a kid, and it's more hilarious now (although for different reasons haha).

      I think the real problems with Adult Swim, and I don't know if they still run these, are 12oz. mouse, Tom, Squidbillies, etc. They were horrible and I went back to watching comedy central during those time slots when they started running them. Saved by the Bell just brought me back.

      But i'm a weirdo, so I might be in the minority here.

    17. Re:Same story with Cartoon Network by denidoom · · Score: 1

      Adult Swim has a pretty interesting lineup. New [adult swim] Shows Revealed
      Assy McGee looks especially humorous!

      --
      Lane Myer: I have great fear of tools. I once made a birdhouse in woodshop and the fair housing committee condemned it.
    18. Re:Same story with Cartoon Network by maxume · · Score: 1

      Because somebody thought that the good ratings were not due simply to Futurama/Family Guy?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    19. Re:Same story with Cartoon Network by Impotent_Emperor · · Score: 1

      I believe it is supposed to be a joke. (If you look at the commercial break bumpers, they do some oddly disturbing distortions of characters.) I figured it had something to do with it being April and they wanted an extra joke. Earlier, they had put fart noises on an episode of Ghost in the Shell. A year or two before that, they put mustaches on a Witch Hunter Robin episode.

      Of course, they do show Globe Trotters, Gary Coleman, and Chuck Norris Karate Kommandos in the 5:00 A.M. death slot. (Although, I think the Chuck Norris show may have more to do with the recent "Chuck Norris Facts" spreding across the internet.)

      And Tom Goes to the Mayor is funny. "Bear Traps" and the hot air balloon one were both good. (Sure, it does seem a little Canadian, but c'mon.)

  9. Young men by NekoXP · · Score: 2, Funny

    Isn't it Bryan Singer that young men appeal to, and not the other way around? :)

  10. G4 to update again by SilentChris · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just hours after announcing their latest change, the G4 management have decided to update the channel again.

    "Even with the recent changes," Finn said, "we still don't think we're still not reaching our target audience. We've decided that every program will be replaced with a guy sitting in shorts and a wifebeater, drinking a low-quality beer. The guy will occasionally scratch himself, and of course the wifebeater will be covered in the requisite motor oil and pit stains. We feel this'll really gel with the 'masculine audience' we're striving for."

    Audiences will have to wait for the fall season for "Guy in a Wifebeater", but focus groups are already responding by vomiting.

    1. Re:G4 to update again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Carl from Aqua Teen Hunger Force got a new job?? Schweet!

    2. Re:G4 to update again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm curious to know how someone would get pit stains on a wife beater? BTW Happy 420 =)

    3. Re:G4 to update again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Even with the recent changes," Finn said, "we still don't think we're still not reaching our target audience. We've decided that every program will be replaced with a guy sitting in shorts and a wifebeater, drinking a low-quality beer. The guy will occasionally scratch himself, and of course the wifebeater will be covered in the requisite motor oil and pit stains. We feel this'll really gel with the 'masculine audience' we're striving for."

      It's called Adult Swim sunday nights.

  11. Wait a minute. by Perseid · · Score: 3, Funny

    You mean to tell me that the shiny video-game box can be used for non-interactive media?

    How strange.

    1. Re:Wait a minute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You mean to tell me that the shiny video-game box can be used for non-interactive media?


      How quaint!

  12. wait... there was technology? by adam.dorsey · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wait a second... G4 was about technology? Dude, I had no idea!

    Next thing you know, people will be saying that MTV was originally designed for music videos... *shudders* The world is all crazy, Mommy...

    --
    You are still innocent until proven guilty. What's changed is what they do to innocent people. - notnAP, #26891325
  13. G4 still around... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought the G4/G5 CPUs being replaced by Intel CPUs. Some technology just don't know how to die gracefully.

  14. He had weird parents. by Thad+Boyd · · Score: 1

    I didn't know Bryan Singer's middle name was SingerBryan.

    1. Re:He had weird parents. by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is not bad proofreading or copy editing.

      This is part of a new initiative to make slashdot more efficient by posting the dupe in the original story itself. No more waiting a day or two for the dupe!

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  15. SpikeTV by gambit3 · · Score: 1

    So, it's SpikeTV Lite? When do they premiere Striperella and MXE?

    1. Re:SpikeTV by Adam+Whisnant · · Score: 1

      Dear Lord, don't give them ideas. They already have The Man Show and Banzai.

    2. Re:SpikeTV by glaeven · · Score: 1
      From the G4 wiki article:
      . . .originally dedicated to video games.
      I feel sad now...
  16. I don't like subjects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have no idea who J.J. Abrams and Bryan Singer are. Icons was one of the only programs on TechTV I liked. While it suffered from some of the hero-worship shortcomings of most documentary subjects, it was decent-enough edutainment about people that otherwise would be ignored by edutainment channels because they didn't cause any military conflicts that the U.S. has been engaged in, and weren't subjects of murder trials.

    Ok, I've looked up J.J. Abrams on Wikipedia and he sounds like his life should be pretty-well covered by Entertainment Tonight or whatever the show that stalks celebrities in the television industry is called. G4 seems to not have a clear idea of what male they're targetting with their TechTV acquisition. I can tell you what a possibly...intolerant group of people that correlate with certain...masculine...interests are going to think of J.J. Abrams are going to think when they see he attended SLC. Well, assuming they know anything about SLC.

    Anyway, killing off Icons basically removes the last program I even watch on G4. I tried watching Brainiacs, but it was really just a more scientifically-challenged version of Myth Busters. I've seen every episode of Star Trek TNG at least three times and have no desire to ever watch the show again. AotS, like The Screensavers, is like the Internet on Television. I might as well sit for a few hours waiting for news aggregators to update.

    Why doesn't anyone make television for me, I'm not that much of an oddball. :(

  17. Mark my words by shoptroll · · Score: 3, Funny

    In the near future, G4 will acquire Spike TV. The new channel will be known as G4 Spike TV. Within 1-2 years, the station will be rebranded G4. Six months after that we will see an increase in programming of such things as "The Martha Steward Show"...

    --
    Insert Sig Here
  18. meh by minus_273 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have my G5 power mac. I could careless about the status of G4.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  19. Scaled-back to where? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    'Attack of the Show' will be relaunched in June with a scaled-back focus on technology.

    I don't see how they can do that; there's hardly any technology focus left on the show.

    The only thing I still watch is X-Play. They've apparently dropped Anime Unleashed. Even the shows I used to watch on G4 before the takeover are either gone (Portal, Eye Drops) or I just stopped caring (Cinematech).

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  20. Face it, they are taking over. by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Interesting

    An old penny-arcade comic commented on how games are now marketted at the cool kids. Not the geeks anymore.

    I recently played the new Tomb Raider and I noticed something. In the first game she was a geekie kinda girl. Sure physically fit and rich but you could tell she would rather read a good book then go clubbing. A dork with tits.

    But over the years she been getting further and further away from that to the point where she now seems to have some "cool" dudes hanging out with her and having totally changed her way of talking.

    It seems to me very clear that this game is being marketted at a different audience. This is a game for cool kids who look, or at least think they look, like the characters in the game. Geeks need not apply.

    The reason is offcourse obvious, marketshare. If you got the geek market then obviously you want to expand that to the non-geek market and so you add some stuff, remove some stuff and then wonder what the fuck happened because nobody is watching anymore.

    I like to call the effect, BBC program being raped by the yanks. BBC is geekie. They got ugly losers losing in the game that is life. Wether that is red dwarf or scapheap challenge it is about fat sad people being normal.

    Give that to an american producer and he will attempt to cool it up. Search for Red Dwarf american pilot for a real horror show. The american version of scrapheap challenge removes the team factor (instead having the nightmare of all geeks, the being picked by the team leader leading to the horror of being the last one picked, remember that from school?), adds meaningless radiochatter and camera movements and in general looks like a show that feels american. Ugh.

    Sadly it sells. Face it, we as geeks are not a big enough group. Even if a product is successfull at targetting us it is only a matter of time until some person looking for promotion suggest altering it to appeal to a larger audience.

    Old tv shows don't die, they just get reworked to appeal to more and more people until finally nobody watches anymore.

    MTV has become a joke for being the music station that no longer airs music. It was so much a joke that other stations sprang up to replace it. Now they too are starting with more and more non-music. Why? Because we got this insane law that forbids us from shooting people from marketting.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Face it, they are taking over. by Eberlin · · Score: 1

      Wait, we have laws against shooting marketeers? Now you tell me! Seriously, though, a lot of things are based on growing market share. I guess it's the inherent greed in the system.

      You've got a demographic...but wait, if you just alter a few things, then you'd get more people (and money). As you described, things get altered and altered until finally you've pissed off every demographic you had -- they identified with your product, and as you've altered it so much, they are alienated by it. Afterwards, all you're left with is the OMG PONIES!!! crowd. :)

      It's the same all over. A company can't just be profitable...they have to show growth from quarter to quarter. So they cut corners on product quality, outsource the workforce, and pretty much do whatever they can to see their numbers go up. Their employees suffer, and the consumers suffer. Since the rich execs don't really feel any financial strain until it's all but over, they don't realize it until it's too late.

      Then again, I'm just some clueless bystander in this game.

    2. Re:Face it, they are taking over. by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Ok, I think you're full of crap and here's why:

      1) The entire point of the *new* Lara Croft is that she's more realistic. Sure it's still a blow-up doll, but at least it's something that a real woman could look like with a huge dose of plastic surgery and talented make-up artists. Maybe. But it's a dozen times better than the old Lara Croft who had basketballs for breasts. This change has nothing to do with geeky/non-geeky, it's just a long-overdue response to the criticism the character has taken since day one.

      2) The American pilot of Red Dwarf wasn't that bad. It didn't screw with the format any more than Red Dwarf did every couple seasons, and it had some really good writing (and some really bad acting.) "Three million years? My God... my baseball cards must be worth MILLIONS!" is a good joke. It's not a British joke, but it's a good one.

      Anyway, I'm just sick of seeing your brand of geek elitism. People are just people... if a guy likes both video games and football, what's so bad about that?

    3. Re:Face it, they are taking over. by Starsmore · · Score: 1

      He's not talking about Lara Croft's physical character design. At least, I didn't interpret it that way. I interpretted it as the character's personality. Granted, I haven't played anything since the second one (and the demo for the new Legends), but that's just what I took away from his comment.

      --
      "If Common Sense was so common, it wouldn't be such a valued trait."
  21. bring back patric norton and his big hammer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any station that would let patric norton loose with a sledge hammer and a pc or better yet a bench transformer cranked all the way up and some electrical components. now that was good tv. leo was cool too megan and kat were nice. put on more girl geek shows.
    I mean sex and tech what else could a guy ask for.
      oh ya and beer!

  22. This happened a long time ago... by Bungleman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can still remember back in the day when this channel was ZDTV... I was all excited when my satellite provider added a new computer channel that I stumbled on one day. I remember watching Dvorak argue with people, seeing hardware reviews, news programs... it was cool to be a nerd.

    Then ZDTV turned into TechTV and it was still good. I loved The Screen Savers with Leo and Patrick (and Kate before that), Call for Help, plus the news and hardware reviews (Fresh Gear)... even the X Play show was cool back then (it was Extended Play and didn't include Morgan Webb). There was even anime and stuff, but it still felt in line with the tech/nerd culture.

    Even TechTV started to go downhill though... with shows like Unscrewed with Martin Sergeant (poser), Wired for Sex, and the hundred reruns of Robot Wars. But it completely fell apart when G4 bought it, and I've only watched about three shows on it since the buyout (all of them were Icons).

    Now I'm just waiting for someone else to make a real tech channel the caliber of the old ZDTV/TechTV. It's not like they have any competition...

    1. Re:This happened a long time ago... by Tinn-Can · · Score: 1

      I miss leo, kate and the fridge... what ever happened to that? :( maybe they can just reform ZDTV and break off from G4

    2. Re:This happened a long time ago... by shoptroll · · Score: 1
      --
      Insert Sig Here
    3. Re:This happened a long time ago... by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      I'm just waiting for someone to sell a hacked up mythtv box at a nice price that makes it just as easy to watch downloaded video as it is to watch tv. PVRs really changed tv, now we're used to just looking through our list of recorded shows and picking one to watch. Would anyone really care how it got there? Be it recorded live as you were at work, or downloaded overnight.. The end result is the same.

      Now we just need a better system for it all and tv might get real interesting.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
  23. Bring Back STARCADE!!!! by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1

    Not the pro wrestling version of Starcade (although I wouldn't put it past G4 to do that these days).

    I'm talking about the classic video game "game show" from the early 80's with Geoff Edwards.

  24. Unpossible! by Rydia · · Score: 1

    Technology and gaming shows don't pull in enough viewers to support a network? Holy crap!

  25. Awesome by The-Bus · · Score: 1

    This is great news!great news and I can'''t wait for it.
    for it.
    for it.

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  26. Screensavers... by JKSN17 · · Score: 0

    I miss "The Screensavers"... I got so much out of that show.

  27. G4 used o be great by jbrader · · Score: 1

    A few years ago when I first came across G4 it was really fun. It was all about games and all the shows had a real "we love games" kind of attitude. There was also some pretty good unintentional comedy (Starcade, although I would occasionally find myself getting into the competition on that show). But then when they bought tech tv they ruined both channels. Now there's almost nothing about games and evn when they do talk about them they almost exclusively talk shit. If I love games why would I want to watch a couple of smarmy assholes talk shit about them? Even when they give a game a good review they still make stupid little sarcastic jokes. Oh and Morgan Webb is not sexy, if you think she's hot you need to go outside and look around.

    --
    You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
    1. Re:G4 used o be great by Tinn-Can · · Score: 1

      you are right it was all about Sumi Das...rawr show me that new stuff honey

    2. Re:G4 used o be great by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      While I agree Webb is overrated, her attraction isn't in her appearence. Physically she is attractive, but nothing you wouldn't run into daily at college. Thats part of the attraction though, it makes the random gamerkiddies feel she's more obtainable and 'real', unlike your average hollywood atention-seeking-barbie. Mix in what is seen as an attractive personality(though is really just onscren persona) and you have mass obsession.

      As for the majority of your post, I do agree. I wasn't a big fan of G4TV because most of my gaming is computer whereas the show focused more on console, but at least it was true to what it was. Mixing it with techtv just diluted both and ruined what little they had. I liked techtv a lot, and ZDTV even more, but they were nevery very strong channels. Anyone that reads slashdot during the day already knew the news stories The ScreenSavers was going to cover, but we still watched because of the personalities and other things that made it interesting. Once you start messing that up, all you have left is filler. Really, I just touched on why TV based tech or gaming is a downhill medium, and magazines even more so. Due to the internet we mostly all have access to everything interesting as it happens. Unless they can create their own content entirely, they have nothing. Even if they can, they need to be able to hold it until the next airing/publication which is hard when competing with people that publish online instantly. Why wait another month for that preview of a game when you could just download the beta tonight?

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
  28. Why? by MrCopilot · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Why is this happpening Again.

    AOTS, ICONS, and Xplay are the only shows worth a damn left on that network. And then only when focused on Tech.

    The only thing I can think of is that their ratings are higher for Street Fury (Occassionally I will stop here until the host speaks) and that other crap fox show and the man show then the tech used to bring in. They think this will translate into daytime viewers. Idiots.

    Don't ditch the Tech shows. Improve the tech shows. How about some hosts who have actually read through their material before they read it off the telepromter. How about leaving ICONS the hell alone, I enjoy that show consistently because they are ICONS to me and its like a tech history lesson for my wife in only a half hour. How about some actual budgets. How about NeverMind I'll just watch the podcasts of your old techTV employees.

    --
    OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's happening again because G4 is trying to chase down a demographic...

    2. Re:Why? by aztec+rain+god · · Score: 1

      What I'm wondering is this: "Why- oh why haven't I killed my television yet?"

      Seriously, there's only so much a man can take.

      --
      Sig cannot be found.
  29. $$$ Dictates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Complain all your want folks, the facts remain, as a Tech channel it just didn't rake in enough dollars. G4 as a game channel didn't rake in enough dollars. So they tried a merger. That didn't rake in enough dollars.

    This process will go on until they either hit on a formula that works (like MTV did) or die off. Face the facts, it's a business, not a charity.

  30. Died long before that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ZDTV was and always will be the penacle of geek television programming. Cool people, good shows, interesting topics. They just needed time to develop more content and broaden their appeal. I remember calling into The Screensavers, being on live TV, and actually interacting with people who knew what the hell they were talking about. Plus Kate Botello is the sexiest geek alive right behind Amanda Tapping.

  31. Burn it down.. by XMultiply · · Score: 1

    I hope this channel gets wiped off the map. Back when it was Tech TV, I use to watch almost every show (Screen Savers, Call for Help, etc..), and when they merged with G4, there were some interesting additions (including Icons which is the best damn show on that network). Now it's Star Trek, Man Show, and Attack of the Show which caters to brain dead college kids, and X-play which is a basically 99% repeats, and God-awful comedy skits that take up 3/4 of the show. Rot in Hell G4

    1. Re:Burn it down.. by UnclePow2223 · · Score: 1

      Ditto, but we wouldn't have digg if Kevin Rose hadn't gotten sick of it either... Plus there's plenty of online revival of the people from TechTV. http://www.revision3.com/ http://digitallifetv.com/blogs/digitallifetv/defau lt.aspx Down with G4 and its ilk.

      --
      org 0x100
      mov dx, SIG
      mov ah, 9
      int 0x21
      int 0x20
      SIG: db "UnclePow$"
  32. Why did they even buy TechTV? by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

    Apparently because they knew G4 wasn't as good, and wanted to kill off the competition. It's too bad they couldn't have just made their network better.

  33. Don't watch much American TV do you? by technoextreme · · Score: 1
    The american version of scrapheap challenge removes the team factor (instead having the nightmare of all geeks, the being picked by the team leader leading to the horror of being the last one picked, remember that from school?), adds meaningless radiochatter and camera movements and in general looks like a show that feels american. Ugh.

    The vast majority of Junkyard Wars was much closer to the show than what you are describing. What you are describing is what happened right before the show went off the air. I think the situation was trying anything and everything to get their viewers. It also hurts your argument that they aired both series before the whole Americanized crap.
    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
  34. We need SlashDot TV by BenJeremy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Come on people, there's got to be somebody out there that can make that happen - take the best of what G4 cast off, and create a true technology channel.

    Do the kinds of programs Discover and History don't - Popular Science and Popular Mechanics (especially those "top secret" specials). Concentrate on computers and video games... Leave the sports video game coverage for G4 - they turn every E3 into a giant commercial for EA sports, anyways.

    Profile the geeky side of celebrities, whether it's some actor spending endless hours on WoW or a jock who sits up late into the night playing Star Wars Galaxies.

    We also need news - not like anything anywhere else, but the happenings on your latest MMORPG or the most recent shuffling of developer houses among publishers. News about betas and bugs, virii and easter eggs. Sure other stations may get around to having a special on the quest for the X-Prize, but we want to know the juicy details AS THEY UNFOLD.

    TechTV probably got three times the viewers G4 did, but TV execs are morons. It's an old boys network, and they just don't get the target demographic. Others have mentioned the ruination of Adult Swim, and more obviosuly, the parallel with MTV's descent into vidiocy. We've seen the unfailing ABILITY of these jackasses to turn a good thing into crap, and their complete INABILITY to see the terrible result for what it is.

    I never tune into G4 anymore. Even X-Play is unbearable, and everything else is Spike TV rejects. Ugh. It needs to just go off and die.

    G4 is dead. The time for SlashDot TV has finally come!!!

    1. Re:We need SlashDot TV by reachums · · Score: 1

      "Profile the geeky side of celebrities"

      Vin Diesel has been an avid Dn'D player for around 20 years. That is the kind of thing I wish G4 would talk about!

      --
      "Just call me Girly Blank"
  35. G4's problem by Tina+Russell · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... I think G4 has a problem, and here it is:

    - They wanted to target gamers. Being marketers, they can only think of anything in traditional demographic terms. Gamers are mostly young men. So, they created a network for young men, about games.

    - The problem is, young men already watch other networks, and by focusing only on young men they alienated everyone else who played videogames. They soon found that videogamers, on the whole, would rather be playing videogames or watching TV than watching TV about videogames.

    - The doom spiral began. They quickly began unloading everything on G4 that had anything to do with videogames, instead aggressively targeting the young male demographic that is already watching Spike TV.

    - Spike TV begins airing videogame shows. Game, set, and match.

    I am absolutely convinced that if I were president of G4, I could turn things around in a heartbeat. As it happens, I imagine that ownership of the company will be pretty easy to come by once it ends up in the cable channel scrap heap. G4, we hardly knew ye.

  36. Who cares? by vulgrin · · Score: 1

    Hey, here's an idea: why don't we all just stop caring? You want tech content? Go online! There's a ton of stuff out there already between podcasts and videocasts. Hell, between Revision3 and the Leo Laporte Multimedia Empire, I probably get a good 3 to 4 hours of entertainment a week. Add into that your Command N's, your Digital Life, your RocketBoom. And that's just scratching the surface.

    Its funny to me to hear everyone bitch and moan about how G4 and Comcast screwed up TechTV. Who cares?! Stop complaining and just watch the NEW TechTV, all online, with the same people and personalities that you are used to. Besides, the stuff that Kevin and Alex do on DiggNation is far funnier and interesting than TSS ever was, since it had to be dumbed down and sanitized for television.

    On top of all that, the content on these 'casts is fresher and more up to date than the TV show's were, just thanks to the production time. TSS and the nightly tech news show were pretty good at keeping up to date, but some of the other content was atrociously out of date.

    And in a matter of a year or two, maybe we'll even be able to get it to our big screen's without going through hoops. (Or I should say, the AVERAGE person will be able to watch it on their TV without having to muck around much.) Then speciality channels like G4 will die horrible, unprofitable deaths in obscurity.

    And then we can dance on their graves. :)

    --
    I sig, therefore I am.
  37. Oh well... by TxdoHawk · · Score: 1

    I received TechTV up until right before the whole G4 shakeup, and by the continually worsening news it sounds like I'm not missing much.

    Seeing Extended Play turn into the crappy X-play was bad enough. Adam Sessler used to be genuinely funny, and they used to put out a decent amount of reviews...then somebody decided the show needed breasts, and it all went downhill from there.

    (On that note, I fail to see why anyone finds Morgan Webb attractive. She looks so decisively average it hurts, add in her ridiculous bias against 2d gaming...and the conclusion is that the only way I'd hit it is in the head with a lead pipe.)

  38. G4 is now Star Trek TV, and that's fine with me by Retired+Replicant · · Score: 2, Funny

    Honestly, I have watched a lot more G4 since they started running Star Trek TNG re-runs, and now TOS re-runs (I watch the Saturday uncut episodes, not the 11pm Star Trek 2.0 with the annoying chat bar and stupid "stock" ticker). However, that is going to get old as soon as I have seen all the re-runs once, and then they start repeating.

  39. What's going on? by galaxia26 · · Score: 1

    Rundown of the fall of G4 1: G4 started out as a great network that was nerdy and informational and fun. 2: G4TV (at the time) had a slogan of "G4TV, TV for Gamers" 3: After the merge, G4TechTV had funny, geeky shows like Portal, informational shows like The Screen Savers, and Cinematic shows like Cinematech 4: Comcast took it and beat the crap out of it, pulled a hat over it's eyes, and kept it from seeing what GAMERS want. 5: With the hat over it's eyes, Comcast reached over and drove the network in the wrong lane, and drove it off onto the "total absolute crap" highway. 6: TechTV has been totally absorbed and assimilated, completely disappearing. 7: Comcast moves G4 almost totally away from gaming, adds some rap and gangsta stuff.

  40. Here's some $100 advice to G4/Comcast... by Moe+Napoli · · Score: 1

    Do what most of the TV herd is doing and begin sliding your focus (aka programming) over to your website. If you REALLY want that 18-24 demo, go where their eyeballs are - not where you hope they'll be... Sheesh!

  41. Slashdot TV by gravis777 · · Score: 1

    We need to have a Slashdot TV, that goes back to what ZDTV originally started, a Microsoft bashing, tech oriented channel. Bring back shows such as Invent This, Silicon Spin and TechLive. Break apart your call in shows, that is, Call 4 Help be mostly for newbies, and have ScreenSavers be more tech savy questions. Do not confuse the two. Cut the crap interviews with the directors of Stick It and stuff like that. And, most importantly, while video games are a part of technology, lets not confuse the issue and try to say that video games are all there is to technology like G4TechTV did.