Slashdot Mirror


Teens Arrested in MySpace Extortion Scam

An anonymous reader writes "Two New York teens have been arrested after trying to extort $150,000 from the makers of MySpace, the popular online community site." From the article: " MySpace discovered the intrusion earlier this year and blocked it. The Los Angeles-based company also reported the incident to authorities. During the course of the investigation, threats were made that unless $150,000 was paid, new exploit code would be released, according to the statement. By this time, the sting operation had been set up, so instead of meeting with MySpace late last week, the pair from New York met with undercover officers from the U.S. Secret Service and the Los Angeles District Attorney's Bureau of Investigation. "

193 comments

  1. Go to jail by linvir · · Score: 4, Funny

    Go directly to jail. Do not pass Go. Do not collect $150,000.

    1. Re:Go to jail by docyahoo · · Score: 0, Troll
      Looks like ZDNet is raising the bar on comments to TFA:
      Thier not hoodlums genius, i live like 20 minutes away from them. thier both straight a students with alot of computer expertise but were using thier skills in the wrong way and tried to make some illegal money off of myspace. Some people need to drop the "everyone from new york is a gangster" stereotype just like they tell us to drop the "anyone not from ny is a redneck" stereotype." Posted by: gtapro91
      And, with that eloquent statement, how could I say any more about my edukation dollars at work here in New Yawk. Please don't bother flamebaiting by blaming upstate.
    2. Re:Go to jail by Nightreaver · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      This is yet another example which shows that crime never pays!

      In other news, 7391 shashdotters consider acquiring illegal software.

    3. Re:Go to jail by hutchy · · Score: 0, Troll

      And Ye shall be known by your atrocious grammer!

    4. Re:Go to jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re:Go to jail
      (Score:-1, Offtopic)
      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 27, @04:56PM (#15417355)
      What the hell are you talking about?

      This is Myspace, not Monopoly. Someone mod this offtopic.


      Well, someone did ;)
  2. if the story is factual by yagu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, two kids hacked MySpace, and threatened further damage unless they were given $150,000, but cry "foul" when lured into a job offer/interview for the purpose of arresting them.

    I'm not sure, but I'm willing to bet extortion dollars thay MySpace would not bother luring people into their space if no extortion were there in the first place.

    It's pretty amazing how criminals (alleged) cry about violated rights when apprehended. Yeah, there are constitutional procedures to guide law enforcement and judicial, thank goodness for that.

    I don't see, assuming these are the kids who did hack MySpace, any impropriety nor violation of their "space".

    1. Re:if the story is factual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So, two kids hacked MySpace, and threatened further damage unless they were given $150,000, but cry "foul" when lured into a job offer/interview for the purpose of arresting them.

      Nothing in the article says anything about them 'crying foul'. It mentions that they're pleading 'not guilty' to the charges but nothing else about their reaction.

    2. Re:if the story is factual by Nadsat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Too bad these hackers were not more interesting. They seem to be simple data miners out for a buck. Script kiddies these day....

    3. Re:if the story is factual by yagu · · Score: 4, Informative
      Nothing in the article says anything about them 'crying foul'. It mentions that they're pleading 'not guilty' to the charges but nothing else about their reaction.

      My bad, I read a different (additional) article... From this Chicago Tribune article (possible registration required).

      The pertinent text from that article:

      ...,

      The popular social networking site improperly lured Saverio Mondelli, 19, and Shaun Harrison, 18, to Los Angeles with the prospect of a consulting contract, said Mondelli's lawyer, Michael Dowd of Manhattan.

      And when they arrived in California last week and sat down for a business meeting with what they thought was a contingent of MySpace employees -- who were actually Secret Service agents and local detectives -- they were arrested without warning, Dowd said.

      "The proposition to hire them as consultants was made by MySpace," Dowd said. "This was a naked attempt to lure them into the lion's den and to somehow make an allegation of impropriety against them."

    4. Re:if the story is factual by dagr8tim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's pretty amazing how criminals (alleged) cry about violated rights when apprehended.

      What about the guy who was held hostage in his own home by 5 Sheriff Deputies while they dunked his head in a fish tank and a toilet, connected batteries/live electrical wires to his genetals, and put a gun to his head in an attempt to force him to sign a waver to allow them to search his home without a warrent. Funny thing was his wife set a tape recorder in the kitchen before being ordered out of the house.

      Ofcouse that was over a year ago and the guy has since been conviced of unrelated drug charges. Are you saying that because this guy was a drug dealing peice of scum the police were allowed to violate his civil rights?

      --
      "Does your computer have IP on it?"
    5. Re:if the story is factual by suffe · · Score: 5, Funny

      Are you insane? Not only did you Read The Fucking Article, you read another fucking article on top of that. Who are you and what are you doing on Slashdot?!

      --

      Karma: 2.71828182846 (Mostly due to small, fun pills)
    6. Re:if the story is factual by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      I read this same article, and I'm trying to figure out who is the bigger idiot: these kids or their stupid ass lawyer. I sure hope he has a better argument than this for the judge.

    7. Re:if the story is factual by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Their "stupid ass lawyer" is just doing his job. Like it or not, one of the drawbacks to having a judicial system that values the rights of the accused, is that the accused will exercise those rights whether or not they are guilty. That is simply the price of justice, and, frankly, I think it's worth it. Due process is not a mere annoyance, nor is the right to confront your accusers -- these things are essential to maintaining a justice system that society can accept. So these kids are probably totally guilty; it is still their lawyer's job to make whatever argument he can that will help them get off.

    8. Re:if the story is factual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be so hard on him! He's probably one of the best slashdot editors I've seen yet!

    9. Re:if the story is factual by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      Before they were arrested, they were asked to read a note aloud, which said:

      Hand me the keys, you fucking cocksucker.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    10. Re:if the story is factual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to mod you funny, but I think words are better here.
      Thank you for making my day dude!

    11. Re:if the story is factual by Nondescrypt · · Score: 1

      If breaking the law meant you didn't deserve to have your rights protected
      there would not be 1 of us left with any rights at all...

    12. Re:if the story is factual by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      I fully agree with what you're saying; everyone has a right to a vigorous defense no matter how horrible of a crime they are accused. However this lawyer first should not be making these idiotic statements to the media; most lawyers say nothing to the media beyond "we will aggressively defend this case" and advise their clients to do the same. Second, if his arguments in court are this weak, his clients will be doing some jail time for sure.

    13. Re:if the story is factual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Thank you for making my day dude!

      I think you need better days.

    14. Re:if the story is factual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it.

    15. Re:if the story is factual by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      hehe, maybe, but not if a mistrial gets declared due to prejudicial media reports, fueled by the lawyer's own actions. Maybe I'm giving the lawyer too much credit for strategizing though...

    16. Re:if the story is factual by thesandtiger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The attorney for one of them is attempting to make the claim that they were tricked. That's what they're supposed to do - what they're legally required to do. I think it would be rather unlikely to expect the guy's lawyer to say "Oh, yeah - they tricked my guy. He's too fucking stupid to walk and chew gum, they got him fair and square."

      One of the guys could have clubbed a baby to death on national television with a rolling-pin, and the lawyer would have to find some way to blame it on Martha Stewart because her rolling-pins are deadly weapons and magnetically attracted to babies, and plus, the baby was kind of being a dick, you know.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    17. Re:if the story is factual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PA Reference++

    18. Re:if the story is factual by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      Due process is not a mere annoyance, nor is the right to confront your accusers [...]

      Sadly, the latter right is pretty much gone thanks to laws like RICO that encourage anonymous tips.

      Why are anonymous tips required? Because the punishment is generally far out of line with the behavior, so the punished feels the need for "revenge". Selling pot is not harming anyone (some drug dealers turn to violence because they cannot get restitution from the courts; however, it is a true statement that less than 100% of drug dealers resort to violence as a method of conflict resolution).

      So if your neighbor turns you in for selling pot, you will never face your accuser. This is a disgrace; free speech does not mean freedom from consequences. A nosy neighbor should have to weigh the consequences of retribution in their mind before picking up the phone and butt-raping their neighbor (figuratively, and ultimately, literally, albeit with someone else's equipment).

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    19. Re:if the story is factual by DenDave · · Score: 1

      Why does the Secret Service have to get involved? The President's family pictures involved? Chelsea Clinton did a bad bad??

      I thought this was a felony offence for the FBI and the DA to sort out.. I'll never understand Law Enforcement post Department of Homeworld Lament...

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    20. Re:if the story is factual by Joebert · · Score: 1

      Why does the Secret Service have to get involved?

      Because they could have been terrorists posing as young adults.

      If Bubba can pass for Becky on myspace, the above is entirely possible.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  3. A MySpace exploit? Oh noes! by autophile · · Score: 5, Funny
    I feel a disturbance in My Space... as if a million preteen girls all shouted "OMG, poniez!" at once.

    --Rob

    --
    Towards the Singularity.
    1. Re:A MySpace exploit? Oh noes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG, poniez!

    2. Re:A MySpace exploit? Oh noes! by Meagermanx · · Score: 5, Funny

      Shows what you know. Preteen girls don't use commas.

    3. Re:A MySpace exploit? Oh noes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like the way preteen girls taste.

      O RLY? YA RLY!

    4. Re:A MySpace exploit? Oh noes! by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      Much less shout them.

    5. Re:A MySpace exploit? Oh noes! by idonthack · · Score: 1

      I'd take your word for it, considering how much time you spend chatting online with preteen girls/FBI agents.

      (On a slightly related note, the captcha for this message says "pregnant".)

      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    6. Re:A MySpace exploit? Oh noes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      On a slightly related note, the captcha for this message says "pregnant".
      Well are you?

    7. Re:A MySpace exploit? Oh noes! by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      that would be a cool hack to do to MySpace...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  4. lol by Scott+Swezey · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Haha. Sorry, they had it comming, even people laughing at them. Stupid script kiddies.

    One more time for the road: Ha ha.

    --
    Scott Swezey
    1. Re:lol by MrSquirrel · · Score: 1

      I guess they didn't know that meeting the people you're trying to extort in person IS A BAD IDEA!

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
    2. Re:lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      lol some more..

      $150,000? This is 2006; MySpace probably spends that much money on office coffee every year.

      Flew out to LA? I couldn't find any details on this, but I'm willing to bet that the two kiddies were given free airline tickets to fly out to LA.

      MySpace? It's not much of a challenge breaking that site, right? Seems like there's a new exploit discovered every month. I hope the media doesn't portray them as l33t "hackers".

      Straight "A" students? This is a funny comment left on the ZDNET site..

      Not hoodlums
      Thier not hoodlums genius, i live like 20 minutes away from them. thier both straight a students with alot of computer expertise but were using thier skills in the wrong way and tried to make some illegal money off of myspace. Some people need to drop the "everyone from new york is a gangster" stereotype just like they tell us to drop the "anyone not from ny is a redneck" stereotype.
      Posted by: gtapro91 Posted on: 05/27/06

    3. Re:lol by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      And I thought education was bad here in the South...

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    4. Re:lol by woot+account · · Score: 1

      No, education is bad everywhere in the US. North, South, West, East, wherever.

    5. Re:lol by rivetgeek · · Score: 1

      I couldn't find any details on this, but I'm willing to bet that the two kiddies were given free airline tickets to fly out to LA. Actually, these "geniuses" paid for their own flights even. Even if they somehow get off, whatever money they made from this scam will be consumed by lawyers.

  5. Re:Not surprised by tbmcmullen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, because only American kids think they can get away with anything and are selfish.
    Thats just plain stupid.

  6. Re:Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This story should be combined with the last one.

  7. Sucks to be them... by jonoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    If I were them I wouldn't be worried about the press publishing my name in connection with extortion, I'd be more embarassed about people finding out I was involved with MySpace.

    1. Re:Sucks to be them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, myspace is so dorky...unlike Slashdot, which is very cool!

    2. Re:Sucks to be them... by tysonedwards · · Score: 1

      Yep, saw that one coming.

      --
      Thirty four characters live here.
  8. Screw the arrest... by Vo0k · · Score: 1

    ...Screw the arrest, the scam, the kiddies... Where's the exploit code?!
    (I'd really laugh if the exploit "leaked" now, costing MySpace much more than $150,000 in downtime, lost data and lost crediblity.)

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    1. Re:Screw the arrest... by ari_j · · Score: 1

      I somehow doubt that myspace's "data" is worth $150,000.

    2. Re:Screw the arrest... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After reading what happened, sounds like $150,000 they wanted was actually two $75,000/yr salaries.. But who knows...
      Sounds like they were some pretty good webcoders that went about getting a job the wrong way. If a maid service mailed you pictures of your dirty floors that they took through your windows or from airplanes and then offered to come clean it for you, you'd probably be very creaped out that someone was peeping in your house and not hire them, and maybe call the cops.. Similar to what went down here as it was reported in the news..

    3. Re:Screw the arrest... by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      I somehow doubt they can lose any more credibility.

    4. Re:Screw the arrest... by aquowf · · Score: 1

      What were these kids thinking, anyway?
      They found a flaw that leaks personal information... Isnt that what myspace is? A way to find out other people's personal information?

      Youth these days...

  9. Easier ways to take down myspace by Foo2rama · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't mess with Tom!!!! Luckily he is my friendslist, so he is my friend right?


    Sad thing is I can think of about 3 ways right now to bring myspace down at least from a users standpoint. The openess of css usage they allow, plus there is a great little expliot making the rounds after you clicked on an outsidelink it takes some actions on your account to propagate itself. You could make a nice cascading corrupted CSS plague, forcing all user pages to crash any browser.

    --


    ---In a time of Chimpanzees I was a Monkey.
    1. Re:Easier ways to take down myspace by __aalnoi707 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yea but who is going to pull up your Myspace page and read it?

    2. Re:Easier ways to take down myspace by paisleyboxers · · Score: 1

      Um... Greasemonkey* + ScriptBlocker = No CSS ALLOWED.

      *Greasemonkey must have the appropriate scripts installed to even work

    3. Re:Easier ways to take down myspace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing those thousands of preteen girls are heavy users of Greasemonkey + Scriptblocker.

    4. Re:Easier ways to take down myspace by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize that the average MySpace user knows how to install Greasemonkey and scripts for it, let alone even knows what the hell CSS is.

  10. Smart enough... by rqqrtnb · · Score: 0, Interesting

    to hack mySpace but not to devise a better way to transfer the pay-off?

    1. Re:Smart enough... by Technician · · Score: 1

      to hack mySpace but not to devise a better way to transfer the pay-off?

      Greed goes a long way. They got led into believing they would collect if they followed the money. I think they took up an offer. They didn't set and stick to firm secure terms. This was not a Western Union transfer out of the country.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  11. Have these guys never seen a movie? by llZENll · · Score: 5, Funny

    Come on now, a job interview? Don't they know the way a transaction like this goes down is on the docks at night (when its foggy of course). The guy drops the money off in a breifcase, then you zoom by on a motorcycle with a hot chick on the back who picks it up as you fly by at 80mph in black leather jumpsuits.... ...oh I see where the plan fell through, being old enough to reach the shifter on the motorcycle, and knowing a hot chick.

    1. Re:Have these guys never seen a movie? by Saeger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nihilist: Ve don't care. Ve still vant ze money, Lebowski, or ve fuck you up.

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    2. Re:Have these guys never seen a movie? by zsau · · Score: 1

      Probably it sounds silly but certain parts of English aren't really transparent to English speakers from different parts of the world, and you've said a couple of words that I've wanted to know the meaning of for a while...

      So what is a "jumpsuit" and what is a "shifter"? Thanks!

      --
      Look out!
    3. Re:Have these guys never seen a movie? by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia is your friend. (I already knew what a jumpsuit was, but not a shifter)

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    4. Re:Have these guys never seen a movie? by jamesh · · Score: 1, Funny

      Careful, now you will have half of the American viewers asking "what is a 'different parts of the world'"?

      <? flame_retardant_suit = on; ?>

    5. Re:Have these guys never seen a movie? by Skater · · Score: 1

      The term shifter is also used on motor vehicles to describe the item you use to shift between gears on vehicles that have manually-operated transmissions. Much like a bicycle shifter. :)

      What is it called in other parts of the world? I'm curious.

    6. Re:Have these guys never seen a movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always thought that non-native speakers would know how (and when) to use a dictionary. I was wrong :( It seems you like to whine and stay dumb. Aye!

      Cheers, Kuba

    7. Re:Have these guys never seen a movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .. you know a hot chick?

    8. Re:Have these guys never seen a movie? by Zemran · · Score: 1

      Sorry, what is 'different'?

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    9. Re:Have these guys never seen a movie? by BurnFEST · · Score: 1

      "Gear stick" here in the AU.

    10. Re:Have these guys never seen a movie? by Wellington+Grey · · Score: 1

      Real hackers would pick up the money on a skateboard.

      -Grey

  12. Slashdot _would_ love them... by 9mm+Censor · · Score: 1

    if they simply released the code, and brought myspace to its knees resulting in a increased need for mydeathspace.com

  13. Man..... by madnuke · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    They are so 1337, I wish I could be like that one day.... And why are the Secret Service helping My Space my tin foil hat is tingling with conspiracy theories....

    1. Re:Man..... by tysonedwards · · Score: 1

      Obviously...

      If people are sitting around archiving every conversation and every event that ever took place (including the questionable, shady, illegal, very illegal, and WTFFAITYT), then the government only needs to go to someones website to find out that "I raped the head cheerleader last night!"

      You see?

      --
      Thirty four characters live here.
    2. Re:Man..... by pawonfire · · Score: 1

      I was curious why the secret service was present for the sting also, and now I'm worried after reading from the USSS website: (www.ustreas.gov/usss) http://www.ustreas.gov/usss/investigations.shtml Since corporations try to claim monetary loss from almost any crime, then it looks like the USSS might have jurisdiction over a whole lot of crimes, especially since 9/11.

    3. Re:Man..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that would be kind of stupid obviously to blog raping women. Myspace is a social experiment. I have had good experiences there and bad experiences.

      Like whoever is sending me stuff as Anita currently to me, some dumbass shit I am sure. I basically wish I could grab this idiot who sends this stuff to me by the scruff of their stupid tee shirt and shake the shit out of them, I dislike it. Either way, I just ignore it.

      Anita likes poker and selling houses. I was like wtf, quit spamming, still? C'mon, I am not dealing with that anymore, you have to be kidding me. I just flag it now. Stuff like that used to bother me, now I just expect it. It is like thanks for sharing the spam, pals. Yeah right. Love ya. Bye.

      Either way, if Anita is real, she doesn't have any friends but Tom, which on myspace it is an impossibility because this Anita person is a normal looking female. She would get a lot of friend invites if she was real. If Anita is fake, it is just annoying spam.

      Vicki

    4. Re:Man..... by rivetgeek · · Score: 1

      Secret service shows up for any federal financial case. Since this was a federal crime, they showed up.

  14. Tracker Sites by P!Alexander · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was wondering if Slashdot would ever cover this.

    These kids were associated with a site that charged for code that you can add to your MySpace profile which would allow you to see who had viewed your profile, when, and where they got to you from (another friend, search, etc). By my calculations they were making upwards of $20,000/month from their service ($5.00/mo with around 4000 users).

    They, and other tracker sites, have been constantly battling with MySpace over the use of the "hacks". Most of the stuff they've used has simply taken advantage of bad programming. The first generation of trackers used a flash file in the profile to read users cookie data. Then MySpace forced all embedded flash objects to disallow the use of actionscript. They moved on to inserting javascript in CSS commands, using image files to capture browser info, etc. MySpace responded by blocking the use of certain domains within profiles. They then bought a bunch of different domains and assigned them randomly to users.

    Then there was some random legal trouble that they never really talked about but had apparently moved past. The next planned release was supposed to be "unstoppable". They had promised the release for about a week and a half and it was eventually pushed back to May 19. Then they got arrested. The site, myspaceplus.com, switched over to a basic notice about "info coming soon" and that was it. There was a pretty active forum on there but I think people were starting to sense that there was trouble and/or the two owners (who went by Jack and Jake on the site) were skipping town.

    Anyway, it's a really interesting phenomenon, especially considering that other services have built in the ability to see who's viewing you as long as you allow others to do the same when you view their profile (Friendster). Most of the tracker sites now are on a similar model where the tracker will only work with other users ot the service.

    So, not really "hacking" per se. It seems that MySpace was most worried about people's IP addresses getting stolen. The sites started hashing them so you couldn't see the actual address. Seems like a weird thing to be worried about on the privacy front if you ask me.

    1. Re:Tracker Sites by pimpimpim · · Score: 1, Redundant
      Thank you for all the info! The way you put it, this doesn't seem to be really 'hacking', everyone is allowed to offer pictures to be included in webpages, and they could ask money for doing it as well, nothing illegal in that! Of course asking 5 dollar/month for the services they offered is a scam, but so is myspace in general, and anyone wasting time and money on all this should just in general be pitied upon :) Furthermore, this doesn't seem to be about "badly written code" in myspace that much, but more about myspace not knowing what their users want. So far, nothing seems to be going on.

      But I guess when they start blackmailing for lots of dollars, they just pass a line and it becomes an undisputable illegal activity. Actually it's a shame, they could've keep on earning a lot of money with just offering stupid people what they want, but know they cut in their own fingers...

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    2. Re:Tracker Sites by TheAntiCrust · · Score: 0

      How is myspace a scam? It's free.

    3. Re:Tracker Sites by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      It's a free scam ;)

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    4. Re:Tracker Sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, from they way you describe it, the early attempts were cross-site scripting attacks. Stealing cookies is a pretty serious security offense, and unauthorized Javascript can do stuff like vandalize your profile with goatse pix, as well as spreading itself virally. So it's a little more harmful than just tracking IPs, at least before.

    5. Re:Tracker Sites by Mooga · · Score: 4, Funny
      It seems that MySpace was most worried about people's IP addresses getting stolen. The sites started hashing them so you couldn't see the actual address. Seems like a weird thing to be worried about on the privacy front if you ask me.

      So you can post your name, age, birthday, address, and all your other personal information for everyone to see on MySpace, but now they wont find your IP address! That's privacy for you!
      If people on MySpace wanted privacy, they wouldn't BE on MySpace.

      --
      ~ Mooga
    6. Re:Tracker Sites by XXIstCenturyBoy · · Score: 1

      Maybe because half of the people on my space don't really post _their_ personnal information. Some of them might have a reason to hide their IP on a site full of pre-teen and teen...

      My Space : The Visual IRC

  15. Death sentence an option? by a_greer2005 · · Score: 5, Funny
    They had an opprotunity to take down the most annoying site in the history of the internet and the greedy bastards didnt pull the trigger? HANG 'EM!

    The abouve comment is a joke...laugh...

    1. Re:Death sentence an option? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The abouve comment is a joke...laugh...

      Humor? On the Interweb? That's no longer allowed! Didn't you get the memo?

    2. Re:Death sentence an option? by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Only on one of the internets(on which there have been rumors) was that banned. This is on the other one.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    3. Re:Death sentence an option? by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      This is the one pointed out by Homer:

      'Oh, the internet is on computers now?'

      You must have been on the other one, invented by Al Gore.
       

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  16. Re:Not surprised by Qacker · · Score: 0

    It's not just American Kids - It's almost every person on the planet.

    --
    Learn lisp today!
  17. Re:Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "American kids thinking that they can get away with anything, interested solely in themselves, and getting something for nothing."

    You just made a generalization about over 70 million people based on an article about two people. Congratulations sir, I think you have a career in politics.

  18. Re:Not surprised by tysonedwards · · Score: 2, Funny

    I am already a journalist, somehow I think that politics may be seen as a demotion.

    --
    Thirty four characters live here.
  19. Re:Not surprised by laffer1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And? Blogging lowers my stress levels. I get to talk about how shitty my day was and a few people close to me may read it and then we'll have a dialog. If not, i put it somewhere and i can let it go. Not just teens blog. I'm in my late 20s. My mother has a blog too.

    Frankly i have less of a problem with blogging than the governments privacy violations with the telephone network. I choose to blog, I didn't choose to let them listen to my calls or view the list of people I called.

    Blogging isn't a breakdown in society, its just a new way to communicate information to people you know. (and don't know)

  20. Are you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The abouve comment is a joke...laugh...

    Are you French or something (in regards to abouve)? Stick with your Royale with Cheese :)

  21. WTF by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Informative
    Okay, first off if the ZDnet story is the true account these kids must surely get somekind of "dumbest criminals" award.

    However if you google for other news stories there seems to be more going on.

    First of they are not teens. 18 and 19 makes them adult in america doesn't it?

    Second is that they apparently ran a website http://myspaceplus.com/ (wich is still up but empty of content, and horribly laid out on opera/linux). Before this it apparently was a site for some software to hack myspace.

    This "first" hack was discovered and plugged. They then apparently tried to extort myspace into paying 150.000 (or get paid to be consultants) and were then trapped by law enforcement officials at a meeting.

    A lot of the explenation by the lawyer of the young idiots sound like typical lawyer crap "anything to get my clients off".

    The real question is, what was myspaceplus.com about? Is this just a story of two idiots who were to greedy and now can learn a bit about the real world. Or did myspace step over the line in trying to get rid of a couple of hackers by appealing to their greed.

    Either way the young aduls are stupid but you can wonder if they really need to spend several years in a federal jail because of it, oh who am I kidding. Fry the suckers.

    It just is fucking hilarious. If their attorny is claiming the truth (HA) then you got to admire their lack of common sense. Ooh, yeah we publish a tool to hack myspace. Oh look they are sending us a job offer to advise them for 150.000 dollars. Lets travel across the country to get rich!

    By the way doesn't the fact that they travelled across the state border (LA and New York are different parts of america right? You yanks ain't got a monopoly on bad education you know) make it a federal crime?

    Oh well, since they are geeks they will at least soon loose their virginity. Squeel piggy, squeel!

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:WTF by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The police did nothing wrong here, these guys are screaming "entrapment" because any criminal that gets tricked whines about it. The only time it's entrapment and thus illegal is if the police encourage you to break a law you wouldn't have normally. Example:

      Not Entrapment: You are a drug dealer, you see an undercover officer (UC) and walk up to them and offer to sell them drugs, without them asking you anything. They then make a buy and bust you. All well and legal, since you made the offer, clearly you were willing to sell drugs with no encouragement.

      Entrapment: You are walking down the street doing whatever and a UC comes up to you and asks for drugs, you say you don't have any, they offer you a bunch of money for them. You decide the money is enough you'll call a friend who's in to that and get the drugs. They then arrest you. That illegal and will get thrown out, since they encouraged you to commit the crime, you wouldn't have done it of your own volition.

      Here, it's clearly not entrapment. As soon as the kids made the demand for money, the police were perfectly justified in making counter offers to trick them in. The kids already broke the law making the demand, entrapment isn't an issue.

    2. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, would the Kama Sutra qualify as a fucking dictionary or a fucking thesaurus?

    3. Re:WTF by Ayon+Rantz · · Score: 1

      It's a fucking encyclopedia.

      Dimwit.

      --
      Pokéthulhu
      Gotta catch you all!
    4. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of they are not teens. 18 and 19 makes them adult in america doesn't it?

      As someone else suggested, why don't you write that in letters. Better yet -- just say it to yourself for an even greater sense of embarrassment.

      Either way the young aduls are stupid but you can wonder if they really need to spend several years in a federal jail because of it, oh who am I kidding. Fry the suckers.

      Good to see that informed, intelligent and humane comments are still what's considered worthy of a +5 on Slashdot these days.

      The real question is, what was myspaceplus.com about?

      RTFA or googling for 10 second would have given you the answer to that. It was a serious business which had been running for quite some time, making several tens of thousands every month. It was operating in a morally grey zone, but wasn't strictly illegal.

      You yanks ain't got a monopoly on bad education you know?

      The only sensible sentence in your post.

      Squeel piggy, squeel!

      Are you advocating rape as a form of punishment? These jokes are not funny. The make light of a very serious problem, make readers with some moral integrity uncomfortable, and portray people like yourself in a distasteful light.

    5. Re:WTF by spacefrog · · Score: 1

      teenage adj. Of, relating to, or applicable to those aged 13 through 19.

      You can be tried as an adult a lot sooner then that. Nobody said they were children.

      I would ask how your comment got to a three score, but that's of no use given your ability to understand simple numbers is so lacking.

    6. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Entrapment: You are walking down the street doing whatever and a UC comes up to you and asks for drugs, you say you don't have any, they offer you a bunch of money for them. You decide the money is enough you'll call a friend who's in to that and get the drugs. They then arrest you. That illegal and will get thrown out, since they encouraged you to commit the crime, you wouldn't have done it of your own volition.

      In the US at least, this is not a certain case of entrapment. It's not entrapment if the government does nothing more than provide an opportunity to commit a crime. There has to be some element of coercion for entrapment to come into play.

  22. Well that violation will happen later by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Funny
    Two fresh kids, a warm summer night, a dropped piece of soap, twenty horny harderned criminals.

    Ah, young love. Brings a tear to your eye doesn't it.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Well that violation will happen later by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1

      Two fresh kids, a warm summer night, a dropped piece of soap, twenty horny harderned criminals.

      Ah, young love. Brings a tear to your eye doesn't it.


      I'm in utter awe at your sense of fairness and humanity.

      In case you couldn't tell, that was sarcasm.

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    2. Re:Well that violation will happen later by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we're all in awe of your melodramatic whining. In case you couldn't tell, that was a straight up, no chaser slap to your polyannish and pious face.

    3. Re:Well that violation will happen later by mkiwi · · Score: 1
      Two fresh kids, a warm summer night, a dropped piece of soap, twenty horny harderned criminals.

      Stay away from Bubba.

    4. Re:Well that violation will happen later by It'sYerMam · · Score: 1

      It will probably bring a tear to their eyes, anyway.

      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
    5. Re:Well that violation will happen later by localman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      LOL! ROTFL!

      Wait... why is rape funny? Oh yeah: because we are as inhumane as anyone we've ever called evil.

      I'm super glad these two pricks got caught. And I am glad they'll be removed from society for a while, or at least financially punished. But I hope they don't get raped, as they would be a) condoning torture, b) likely make them even more problematic members of the society in which I live and c) give an even worse criminal the pleasure of raping.

      Cheers.

    6. Re:Well that violation will happen later by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      He said "hard".

    7. Re:Well that violation will happen later by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody here condones or advocates torture. When they joke about prison rape all they are asking for is something called karmic balance. Many prisoners, especially in the United States, are better off than the very poor. They have 3 square meals a day, free health care, free education, sometimes free legal services, a gym, etc. And that's the maximum security prisons. The white collar ones are even nicer (free cable?). The idea that there *could* be an additional punishment that is repugnant to everyone helps ease the idea that balance hasn't been restored.

    8. Re:Well that violation will happen later by jpling · · Score: 1

      lol he did say "hard" XD I wonder if the teens said "We found a flaw in myspace. But in order for you to know what this flaw is, we want you guys to pay up". Because that it self seems like freelancing. If that is what happened I bet the myspace lawyers thought it would be easyer to make it seem as a threat because I heard that is exactly what microsoft does. I doubt that is the case though, i think they were hackers just wanting quick money and did actually use threats. Microsoft will sue you if you tell the public about a flaw that they wont fix. Idiotic I know.

      --
      jappleng.com - News best served with breakfast.
    9. Re:Well that violation will happen later by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      It's possible, but you'd figure they'd need some kind of proof before getting someone arrested -- I'm guessing there must've been some record of threatening conversation via e-mail.

    10. Re:Well that violation will happen later by localman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nobody here condones or advocates torture.

      I would bet that the majority of people here could care less that there is ongoing rampant rape and physical abuse in US prisons. They may not have a desire for it, but they aren't going to do anything to stop it.

      I understand the desire for karmic balance. Raping a extortionist is not karmic balance.

      Cheers.

    11. Re:Well that violation will happen later by 1nv4d3r · · Score: 1

      Right. I've always thought it's not fair that so many criminals get the pleasure of raping, when I don't.

    12. Re:Well that violation will happen later by localman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You are a strange one, son.

    13. Re:Well that violation will happen later by Grrr · · Score: 1
      Nobody here condones or advocates torture.

      Sweeping generalization.

      condone: excuse, overlook, or make allowances for; be lenient with

      When they joke about prison rape all they are asking for is something called karmic balance.


      There's truth in humor. I have to echo the other respondent - there is nothing "balanced" about "asking for" people to be raped. If that prospect eases anyone's mind as a response to the completely unrelated phenomena of insufficient consequences, they're seriously disturbed...

      But then I guess a big advantage of being a coward is the ability to make indefensible statements of behalf of all /. users.

      <grrr />
  23. Re:Not surprised by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In the end, services like MySpace is one of the signs of the decline of society as a whole.

    Look at it, people no longer care about privacy as they are publishing every single aspect of their daily lives for everyone to read about, including things like "My boyfriend dumped me today! I wanna die!"


    Since when is a society on the decline when people can express themselves freely without any serious repercussions? The only use for privacy is protection against intolerant people, so societies where people voluntarily do not make use of it are probably very tolerant of individuals. I might have missed a few developments, but I always thought that kind of freedom is one of the things we consider to be a fundamental values of ours?

  24. Re:Clearly not all teens have limited science abil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hacking up some javescript isn't exactly "computer science".

  25. MySpace pages already make some browsers crash. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Half the MySpace pages I've looked at are so chock full of shit that they cause Safari to freeze so I can't scroll down the page, and then crash, preventing me from reading much of anything.

    I look at this as one of its best features, because if I spent more than a minute looking at those horribly-designed pages covered with lame images, I might have to gouge my eyes out in disgust.

    1. Re:MySpace pages already make some browsers crash. by OctaviusIII · · Score: 1

      And yet, they're still better than the geocities and angelfire pages of yore.

      --
      What's this? Another weblog? On transit?
    2. Re:MySpace pages already make some browsers crash. by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 1

      I would disagree, mainly because of the music and videos that tend to be embedded into myspace pages. The grammar and spelling are also beyond anything previous.

  26. Heh by Hawthorne01 · · Score: 5, Funny
    And this was posted right above an article about how science learning was down in U.S. schools.

    Coincidence? ;-)

    --
    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
  27. Re:Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing like generalising onto the population of American kids from a couple that hacked a website...

    But hey, pick your favourite Slashdot generalisations and throw them out there for mod points.

  28. Re:Not surprised by MrSquirrel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not to sound like a jerk, but you're dead wrong. "American kids thinking that they can get away with anything, interested solely in themselves, and getting something for nothing." If you said "almost everyone" instead of "American kids", I would have agreed with you, but I have problems with both the "American" and the "kid" parts.

    First off, the easy one -- kids. Kids are NOT the only people who try to get away with anything, are interested solely in themselves, or try to get something for nothing -- here are a couple good ones:
    news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060527/ap_on_fe_st/he licopter_fireworks (a woman shoots fireworks at a police helicopter because it was annoying her by being there -- now she's charged with a felony),
    news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060525/od_nm/court _strangle_dc (a defendant on trial for murder tries to strangle his own lawyer IN THE COURTROOM),
    www.dumbcriminals.com/drugs/dil-doh/ (a couple steals sex toys and enhancement pills repeatedly from an adult store, they end up being caught on one of their many return trips and when they are caught, the "goods" are in a bag NEXT TO THEIR 3 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER),
    and last but not least - EVERY drunk driver EVER.

    Now for the "American" part. Stupidity is not a trait restricted to Americans -- PEOPLE ALL OVER THE WORLD ARE IDIOTS:
    news.com.com/Worm+traps+alleged+child+porn+offen der/2100-7348_3-6002302.html?tag=html.alert (A German child pornographer turns himself in after getting an e-mail virus telling him he was under investigation.

    And finally, to prove that not just American kids commit crimes -- www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_1772630.html?menu=ne ws.quirkies.strangecrime (Austrian kids steal a bunch of stuff so they can afford after-school prostitutes).

    I think I've made my point. Sorry, I just get a little riled up when people make broad generalizations with negative connotations.

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
  29. "They are not teens" by jdbartlett · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "First of they are not teens. 18 and 19 makes them adult in america doesn't it?"

    Sorry, could you say that again with numbers in writing? I'll give you a hint: EighTEEN and NineTEEN.

    You are correct that they are adults (legally able to sign a contract). They are also teenagers.

    1. Re:"They are not teens" by Osty · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are correct that they are adults (legally able to sign a contract). They are also teenagers.

      I don't know if the OP meant it this way, but I took it as a comment on how US society (or at least the media) tries to excuse behavior. Legally, at 18 you're an adult. The term "teen", while technically referring to someone between the ages of 13 and 19, tends to imply "child". So, are you still a child at age 18? What about at age 25? As an example, the local news continually referred to both the shooter and victims of the recent rave killing here in Seattle as "kids". The shooter was 28. Some of his victims were 21, 22, 26, and 32. Are those "kids"?

      Maybe it's a sign of our aging baby boomer population, who see anybody younger than them as kids. Maybe it's because of our economic climate that keeps "kids" in university until 25 or 26 (and then only graduating with a Bachelor's degree, not even a Master's or better). Maybe it's our "take no responsibility" society that wants to blame anything but the person (thus the person is a "kid" who didn't know any better, rather than an adult). Or maybe I'm just reading too much into it.

    2. Re:"They are not teens" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say maturity-wise you are still a kid until 25 or so, exactly as you state.

      This is not due to an aging population or anything like that. As society and technology advance requiring less responsibily at older and older ages then the "adult" age will continue to creep up. More people are also going to college and such. There is no way in hell you can convince me a 20-somthing fresh-out is not a kid. They are, plain and simple.

    3. Re:"They are not teens" by HappyEngineer · · Score: 1

      You're referring to maturity. People gain maturity by being on their own, independent of others, regardless of age.

      When someone refers to someone as a "kid" then there's no way to know the age of the "kid" unless you know if they are referring to biological or mental age. Often it's just a relative term. A 70 year old may well refer to a 40 year old as a kid. I know that parents will refer to their children as their kids no matter how old they are.

      On the other hand, I don't know how often people use "teen" to refer to someone between 13 and 19. I'm guessing the most common usage is to use teen to refer to adolescents, but who knows. When it comes to pron, teen will often refer to 25 year olds (or even older).

      Language is often not strictly logical. I guess you just have to assume ambiguity. If you want specifics then you need to know the specific age.

    4. Re:"They are not teens" by chrispycreeme · · Score: 1

      Ravers are "kids" no matter what age they are. You can be 35 years old and be a raver kid. Although I've been told that you should give up the life by the time you are 30. But it's too much fun to give up completely. Ive meet people in their 50's at raves. I would agree that eight-teen and nine-teen would qualify as teenagers. The word teen is right there in the name of the age. eh?

    5. Re:"They are not teens" by jdbartlett · · Score: 1

      I've never understood teenager to mean any more or any less than "person between 13 and 19", though I don't disagree with your statement that people tend to assume "person 17 or younger". That is, of course, their error. You're also right on the money with the term "kids" - ageing baby-boomer population - except with the reference you linked. The media makes an awkward example because it has good reason to sensationalize. "Kids" sounds so much more sensational than "young adults", even though only two of them were under 18, and even then not young enough to bring the mean age of his victims below 21. This is also why the term "teenager" was chosen to describe the MySpace "hackers". Extortionist teenagers being carted off to jail is so much more sensational than the same thing happening to "young adults". But the term was used correctly.

  30. Welcome! by Lip · · Score: 5, Funny

    Welcome to MyJailSpace.com!

    1. Re:Welcome! by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bubba is in your extended network!

    2. Re:Welcome! by x86eon · · Score: 1

      Because it's important to know whose bitch is whose.

    3. Re:Welcome! by iphayd · · Score: 1

      In Soviet myjailspace.com Bubba's extended network is in you.

  31. The value of Myspace Data by DaggertipX · · Score: 5, Informative

    Are you kidding me? There is a reason that Fox bought myspace - strictly for it's "data" as you put it. Myspace is a site where one of the most profitable(not to mention fickle) demographic in the world voluntarily offer up their likes/dislikes etc to a company in great detail that is easily searched, cross referenced, and advertised to. It is possibly the biggest advertising goldmine I've ever imagined.
    It's always baffled me how so many people could miss what is so big and profitable about Myspace. Even if the site itself never made money (which I doubt, as they advertise heavily and widely) - the data they collect is worth millions upon millions of dollars.

    1. Re:The value of Myspace Data by ari_j · · Score: 1

      I think that there is more value in the source of the data than in the data itself. If you wiped out everything on Myspace other than the usernames and passwords, the data would be back in a day at the most. The userbase is the valuable component, just as it is on Slashdot. The data on Myspace may be worth more than that on Slashdot, but only in passing.

    2. Re:The value of Myspace Data by Frozen+Void · · Score: 1

      Slashdot is news webblog,MySpace is social network.They are apples and oranges.Userbase is unimportant,there always enough sheep to run the show.Its the site that matters,what makes it unique,what features it provides,what content it serves.Userbase is not what makes sites,sites exist on their own.
      Userbase is the community of the site.

      Slashdot isn't doing the community aspect as priority while myspace does,liveJournal does,and every general forum.That why Slashdot grows so slow compared to myspace.Its threads are a joke compared to gaia Online(by size),though much more advanced.

      Userbase is consequnce of interest in said site.Cheap(not necessiary dirty,just basic) populist strategies always bring people in.Its easy to do,advertise, and profit on.Nothing novel required.Think of AOL,Yahoo,Gaia,and any web portal.

      Slashdot freezes old threads,there isn't a general forum,social interaction is an afterthought.Just think who knows about your Slashdot journal more then your site? Replies to comments as form of interaction is deficient on so many levels,that bring whole weblog business in spotlight.It like viewing an academic dispute,but here it forced mode of interaction(by Slashdot standards).

      You will get modded to oblivion or ridiculed if you introduce off-topic stuff or diverge from local consensus.
      Free discussion is curbed into rigid Slashdot culture.Unless you joke
      your comments cannot reflect your wishes,without reforming them to tastes of Slashdot(and i'm not talkign about lameness filter alone,you PEOPLE ARE THE LAMENESS FILTER).

      Userbase on Slashdot therefore worth much less then MySpace(even if both had same
      number of users) despite it being of lesser quality then Slashdot.

    3. Re:The value of Myspace Data by Technician · · Score: 1

      Even if the site itself never made money (which I doubt, as they advertise heavily and widely) - the data they collect is worth millions upon millions of dollars.


      Too bad the data is not verifiable. I have foster kids. They have accounts. I visited My Space and found the minimum age is 14.

      I think My Space has a lot of 14 year old accounts that won't be 14 for several more years. I know of 3 that are really 12.

      With some of the content on the site, I wish they had a way to verify the age of it's members. I've also heard some of the 15 year old girls are neither girls or under 25.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  32. Re:Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the 80's and 90's they were called diary's. You could buy a pretty pink one and hide it under your pillow to relieve your stress.

  33. Some mothers do have 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm Betty. The cat did a whopsee on my shake down operation.

  34. Re:Not surprised by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Look at it, people no longer care about privacy as they are publishing every single aspect of their daily lives for everyone to read about, including things like "My boyfriend dumped me today! I wanna die!"

    If they choose to, what harm is there to that? I mean, there are people starting wtih JennaCam and ending at BigBrother who'd like to be in front of a cam 24/7. Great for them. If they want to keep a public diary (read: blog), go ahead. For the most part I consider it a good thing that people aren't that insanely stuck up with their facade (dunno if that's the right english word) and that they live life with their ups and downs, just like everyone else.

    What's important is that things can also be private when you choose to. That you don't feel on display, that people can grope into your private life when you don't want to. If you're a creepy stalker, a marketdroid or the frigging government, I don't like people profiling me, analyzing me, collaborating data. Chances are you'll be able to read out of it more than I want you to. It's well known from intelligence work that a collection of seemingly innocent unclassified information put together can reveal things that are (and should be) classified. Same goes for a personal life.

    Even if there's a "breach" of privacy and things are already public, either because you were bloody drunk, your friends decided it'd be fun to surprise you or use a hidden cam, your ex was bitter or for some other reason it's still private. There are some kinds of mistakes or silly and embarrasing situations you wish would go away, or least limited in scope to some good friends and for a limited time. Good luck with that in a digital world though...

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  35. Why It sucks to be them by climbon321 · · Score: 1

    Ya, I'd be worried about the press publishing my name too because then people could log onto myspace and learn even more about Shaun and Saverio

    1. Re:Why It sucks to be them by Silicon+Jedi · · Score: 1

      Crap, they live in my town. Ick.

  36. Re:Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    American kids thinking that they can get away with anything, interested solely in themselves, and getting something for nothing.

    Right, because irrational behavior is unique to solely American teens.

    Just stop, you sound like a bitter foreigner.

  37. Some mothers do have 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Hmmmm Betty. The cat did a whopsee on the boys' website's google cache:

    http://66.249.93.104/search?q=cache:XrpeKGWy2egJ:s py.myspaceplus.com/+&hl=en&gl=uk&ct=clnk&cd=1

  38. The Real Deal by rivetgeek · · Score: 5, Informative

    I speak from experience in that I was the one to bring this scam to the attention of myspace in the first place. And I cracked the first several codes they released. ( Having friends that work at myspace helps) They ran a site that released "trackers". These were bits of flash mostly that when loaded onto a users page cause anyone viewing that page to be victimized by a series of css or bad design exploits. These mostly took advantage of css through flash actionscript that was encrypted to obscure the actionscript (swfencrypt). As for their latest "unblockable" code: it was really lame. A flash file on the users page redirects you to a 3rd party site that looks like myspace (think pishing tactics) that then asks you to enter your email address that is associated with your myspace account to view the users page. So now they have your ip and your myspace account and how often you visted the users account. Frankly you'd have to be a moron to fall for this though. For an example check www.blendnet.com/verify.php (though I wouldnt recommend entering a valid email address since these guys still control this server. And should this give anyone an idea, don't bother, it's already been blocked) P.S. If there are any myspaceplus users reading this, you people are some of the dumbest forum posters on earth, we watched you all this entire time and you gleefully gave us everything we needed to find and crack these stupid little codes.

    1. Re:The Real Deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am amazed you admit publicly to being so incredibly stupid. A lobotomized monkey could have figured it out. Just look at the damn profile for christ's sake.

    2. Re:The Real Deal by rivetgeek · · Score: 1

      Aw a wittle bitty myspaceplus forum-tard got his feelings hurt?

      Come back when you can explain to me how it was blocked then, Jackass.

      The source was encrypted. To block it, obviously the source had to be decrypted. So yes, I'm stupid for knowing cryptography and ruining your good time stalking people on myspace.

      In closing, please defecate on your fist, and proceed to punch yourself in the face.

      Yours Truly,

      Rivetgeek.

  39. Myspace by certel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And so it begins. Myspace will be the next online target such as the gambling sites were a couple years ago.

  40. Re:Extort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who the hell modded this off-topic? I'ma send 'im my bank stuff... I don't want the internet goin' down. The bank president died... now is the time... I can trust him; he has my email address, so I must know him.

  41. Re:Not surprised by acornboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes all teens have selfish tendencies and can be self absorb and haven't developed the capacity to evaluate consequences... so why is it still valid to mention American kids specifically? Because the culture of entitlement has beeen taken to the highest offices of government and the corpoprate world to such an extent that beggars the imagination in comparison to the rest od the so called first world (and most of the rest of the world to!!) this give kids in American an even bigger delusional system to mimic than anywhere else so yeah the kids aren't really to blame, the whole situation is kinda fucked up...

  42. "Myspace.com: error" by mattpointblank · · Score: 3, Funny

    This had to fail, if everyone who found code issues in Myspace's programming wanted $150,000 they'd be bankrupt by Monday.

  43. What despicable conduct! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is a chilling tape! We're listening to five officers beat him and then put a gun to his head while detailing their cover story to explain his death unless he agreed to sign a waiver of his rights. They swore under oath that they never as much as threatened him until the tape was produced. At least all five officers involved have been setenced to prison for 4+ years each. Knoxnews has a good page about the incident.

    1. Re:What despicable conduct! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This to me is everything that is wrong with the world. Police officers (while on duty) are in an intimately trusted position. Due to this, I believe anything they do should face far greater punishment for crimes. After listening to the tape, I cant image what in the FUCK the judge was thinking taking their 'good previous military service', and such into account. 4 years? Felony conspiracy to violate civil rights? They fucking threatened to kill him. They fucking tortured him.

  44. Re:Not surprised by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    "(a woman shoots fireworks at a police helicopter because it was annoying her by being there -- now she's charged with a felony)"

    From the Article: "Thompson is facing a felony charge of shooting or throwing a deadly missile into an aircraft."

    You know what's sad? A bottle rocket isn't deadly to a human, let alone a helicopter. What she did was stupid, but ... felony?

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  45. And the connection is...? by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What's the connection between this story and my rights online?

    1. Re:And the connection is...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The connection is that it seems being online to some people is an excuse to fuck with people. It's pathetic and unresponsible behavior. I wonder what their parents think about this. This two aren't even kids. They are adults, 18 is an adult. If they did this to try to play a joke, I am sure it won't be too bad for them, but they are adults, so I am sure it won't go well. If their intention was to really extort money, what in the hell are those two smoking? LMAO.

  46. Re:Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I always thought that kind of freedom is one of the things we consider to be a fundamental values of ours?

    It is. What's gone are modesty, self-consciousness and restraint. People are posting everything, for no reason other than to stroke their own egos or insult others, while the rest of the world just points and laughs.

    Freedom is definately an American trait. It's too bad that personal responsibility and restraint in America - particularly restraint against squandering freedom on narcissistic pursuits, or intimidating and manipulating others in the name of freedom - is on the decline.

  47. OMG! Entrepeneurs! KILL! by egarland · · Score: 1

    They did something with my product that I didn't intend! CRIMINALS! FRY THEM! And worse.. they MADE MONEY! Throw the book at them!

    Seriously.. the extortion thing was pretty dumb of them, but this sense of ownership of everything a company touches is insane and needs to end. People will build on top of your work. Its the way free market economies work. Get over it.

    --
    set softtabstop=4 shiftwidth=4 expandtab nocp worlddomination
  48. Leave me alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Letter to Tom I should have written 5 months ago:

    Tom, you are never around for help, I think you are myth in general. When I tried to contact you before to help me with my spammer/cyberharrasser problem, you were no where to be found. That's OK, you are busy and you look like a nice person. So I went to the police. They helped me file a report. Anyway, no problem.

    Tom, could you ask the cyberharrassers to leave me and other women the f!ck alone on myspace.com? I don't see why the cyberharrassers are bothering, I wouldn't give them the time of day whoever it is. They have every right to be on there just like anyone else without harrassment, I don't bother them, so don't bother me, seems pretty simple to me. I am sure you have enough lawsuits to handle anyway Tom. I just ignore them.I had to make the police dial 8 for the law dept of myspace.com. to get my account cancel because it was under my other email address that was already deactivated.

    Heads up to all the nice people on /. and myspace.com, if you ever have to go through this silliness, and if you need help with your cyberharrassers, that is where you should go, dial 8, but the police can only contact myspace.com through their phone menu. Then cancel your account with myspace.com. Forget about it for awhile. Then come back when you just don't care about whoever the fuck is bothering you. Just flag it and forget like everyone else does.

    Thanks for caring and paying attention and proving what f!ckwads you really are cyberharrassers, I already knew you were terrible people, it is not like I care, but I thought I would write you Tom to say hello. Like I said, you seem nice, but you need a cyberharrassment department pronto at your offices in Santa Monica. And I like Santa Monica, it was an awesome place to visit and I liked the cool little coffee shop that opens and closes whenever they feel like it on Santa Monica Blvd.

    P.S. I still think cyberharrassment sucks though.

    Vicki

  49. Re:Not surprised by AchiIIe · · Score: 1
    Bah, I've spent too much time on wikipedia, I noticed that the link you had provided was not href'ed and missed the initial http... so I was looking for a button to edit and correct it.

    well, anyways, here you go:
    --
    Nature journal lied in Britannica vs Wikipedia Ask to retrac
  50. Re:Not surprised by Nutria · · Score: 2, Insightful
    In the 80's and 90's they were called diary's. You could buy a pretty pink one and hide it under your pillow to relieve your stress.

    To heck with pretty pink ones. Great men have been keeping journals since inexpensive paper came to Europe.

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  51. Re:Not surprised by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

    Do you have any *evidence* to prove that American kids are more greedy than others? Especially since they took this gimmick from Eastern European hackers? No? Then shut the fuck up you ignorant shit.

  52. Re:Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    If it goes high enough and gets ingested by the engine, it is potentially deadly. Those small diameter high-rev turbojets don't like trash coming through the intake. She'd be very lucky to have accomplished that, though. Her chances were methinks on par with winning big in lotto.

    Cheers, Kuba

  53. Re:Not surprised by ookabooka · · Score: 1

    I think the problem is that people dont realize that anything they put in their could be read by anyone, not just people they wouldn't mind reading it. Not only that, but it's possible that whatever they type won't go away either, even if they want it to. The internet has a nifty ability to be able to save anything. . . as the old cliche goes, once it's out on the internet, you can never get rid of it. So while someone may like that their friends may read their blog, or perhaps a random stranger, and offer a tidbit of advice/dialog, there are also marketers, stalkers, government, etc.

    Imagine how well a stalker could get to know his/her victim just by reading everything available on their victim's blog, from day 1. Sure many of the topics may be mundane, but it adds up fast. . .Personally, I'd be a bit more reserved about it, if I dont want a marketer/stalker/government knowing it, I don't put it on the internet, and I would think that would be common sense.

    --
    If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
  54. Now *that's* a sophisticated web application. by dsandler · · Score: 1
    My particular configuration of browser, font, window size, etc. conspired to place this story's headline at the bottom of the window; the only text visible "above the fold" was:
    Your Rights Online: Teens Arrested in MySpace
    Finally, MySpace gets interesting!
  55. A little unethical by AussiePenguin · · Score: 1

    Sounds at least a little unethical to me. Shouldn't they have been arrested in their own state and extradited if need be?

    --

    Jeremy
    Melbourne, Australia
    Jabber Australia

  56. Re:Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well it's not like you are forced to peruse the likes of MySpace, so why do you care what Joe Teen is posting? And if Joe Teen isn't your kid, why do you care that he is "squandering freedom on narcissistic pursuits"? Voltaire comes to mind: "I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it." So while MySpace may not be your thing or my thing, I don't think it's either of our place to vilify it or the people who use it just because we don't.

  57. Re:Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you said "almost everyone" instead of "American kids", I would have agreed with you,


    Yeah, but:


    I just get a little riled up when people make broad generalizations with negative connotations.

  58. Re:Not surprised by lagerbottom · · Score: 1

    How did a generalization like this get modded up.

    --
    "He was a wise man who invented beer." - Plato
  59. Re:Not surprised by vertinox · · Score: 1

    Because it is kind of true.

    Americans (and being one I know how this is) are selfish in general on our every day lives and we think we can get away with a lot of things. Sure during disasters we are generous, but most of the time we don't lift fingers to help each other or give each other the time of day.

    We cut each other in traffic to get ahead. We speed because we think we can get away with it. We lie. We cheat. We steal. We put others down so we can get ahead. And we do it all because we want more... More of the good life.

    It happens in our corporations work and it happens in our government as well.

    I'm sure it is a generalization and most of the people I know aren't like this (because I wouldn't stand to be their associate) and luckily I don't work for a company such as I mentioned (because I would have quit by now).

    But chances are between my home, job, and various other places in life I usually run in to those types (I live in a city of 1.25 million people so it's not hard)

    And I'm sure other countries face similar problems but not in our extremes and we could work on our "altruism" or at least not try to be "self assholes" all the time.

    Including me... I'm horrible for cutting people off in traffic and giving them the bird.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  60. Re:Not surprised by lagerbottom · · Score: 1

    I, being a filthy american, know there is a hint of truth to what was said. However, generalizations have no place in rational discussion, and modding them up cheapens the discourse.

    Now I suppose we'll get a +5 funny for a reply to my "rational discussion" with a "you must be new here". :)

    --
    "He was a wise man who invented beer." - Plato
  61. Re:Not surprised by technicalandsocial · · Score: 1
    The only use for privacy is protection against intolerant people

    Which is why under the current U.S. Administration, you'd think today's American youth would fight for privacy more than ever.
    You have to excerise your right to privacy as a personal policy if you have/had such a freedom, or you will watch that right be removed before your eyes.

  62. Re:Not surprised by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 2, Funny

    Give us Europeans the credit we deserve. We're just as capable of being jerks. We just have smaller cars, fewer missles and better beer.

    --
    -- Using the preview button since 2005
  63. Surprised? by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1
    Why are so many of you surprised by this? With the recent press about all the "worlds dumbest would-be criminals" blogging about their future and past illicit exploits on MySpace, it's no wonder these two knuckleheads fell hook line and sinker.

    Glad to have them out of the genepool.


    The kid that eats the marbles, doesn't live to have kids of his own.
    George Carlin
    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  64. Exactly! by jZnat · · Score: 2, Informative

    An attorney's job (as confirmed by the American Bar Association's Attorney's Oath) is to do his or her best job possible for every client to win the case. It's their job! You need to blame the person who hires the attorney for malice or idiocy typically.

    --
    'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    1. Re:Exactly! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, but "doing their best job" is, ideally, not supposed to involve lying, cheating or stealing, nor are they required to perform illegal or unethical activity simply because their idiotic or malicious client requests it. If they do, it's because they want the money that client is paying them. On the other hand, when you hear a defense attorney babbling nonsense about his felonious client's sterling character it's generally an attempt to offset any potential jury/media bias, and that's a very real factor in jury selection and the outcome of a well-publicized trial.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  65. Re:Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spoken like a true American. God bless you.

    HAHAHAHAHHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHA. Get with the rest of the world, you campfire joke punchlines. Here's some distasteful hoping that more crazed religious lunatics devastate your fucked up population.

  66. 150k, WTF by Old+Wolf · · Score: 2, Funny

    [pinkie in mouth] One hundred and fifty ... THOUSAND ... DOLLARS!!!

  67. Re:Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mySpace is nothing but a big voluntary "Privacy violation". And everyone is whining and crying about their privacy, only to put their most inner secrets on mySpace to boost their ego's, make big impression with others, and just attracting the wrong kind of attention. Cops, perverts, preditors, mass marketers, and just about anything else a self respected netizen would want to avoid. It's no WONDER it's such a big Phat target for perverts and cops.

    Obviously a few teens feel a little bitter about this, and decided to exploit them. Why am I not surprised... But with Rupert Murdoch's huge wealth thrown into MySpace, making it very very popular, it's going to continue to be a big target, but with most schools blocking it now, who knows what's going to happen.

    j

  68. DSFR by $uperjay · · Score: 1

    ie, do some fucking research.

    These kids ran a tracker service that allowed you to see which users had clicked through your profile. It wasn't an original idea; the first implementation was through another service called spyspace, which a member of the Philadelphia-based, music-oriented forum at board.crewcial.org (the current form of the predecessor communites of pr.n and pf.c) had coded up and provided free of charge to his peers. One or more of them abused the service and sold accounts on eBay, at which point the MySpacePlus programmers caught wind of the concept and decided to code their own.

    The original Spyspace service took everything from cookies, and allowed you to view the profile, access time, IP address, and - if they were using Internet Explorer, the contents of their clipboard (!!!). Out of privacy concerns Spyspace's coder removed the clipboard function fairly quickly. MySpace was aware of the service's existence and patched most of the holes that allowed it to work, although the Spyspace code was simply altered to read data in different ways and stayed up. Eventually, too many accounts had been sold to people outside of the community and the coder did not wish to be associated with the project any longer, and terminated the service.

    This was about the same time as MySpacePlus, the service created by the arrested pair, was taking off. They did not seem to possess the same coding talents as Spyspace's creator and were not able to create the same workarounds, so the quality of their service degraded as Myspace's security improved. There were always concerns about the security of their service, as well - the coder of Spyspace apparently examined their service and noted that they collected personal data of their users, such as Myspace logins and passwords, that Spyspace did not.

    At any rate, either the pair discovered a new vulnerability that was not marketable in the same way the tracker services were, or they were simply bluffing. I think an important note is this: if they had instead said, "we have discovered a vulnerability in your product and will sell you the details for $150k," they would still be prosecutable under American law. In fact, it is entirely possible that this is exactly what they said. Is this a just law at all? Consider that Fox would have had a concrete choice - attempt to figure out the flaw themselves and risk a loss of credibility, or buy the data. The loss of credibility is in any rate not a result of the teenagers' actions, but of Fox's own flawed code! The way that TFA is written is clearly in judgement against the pair already, but without specific details the degree of actual extortion here is suspect.

    The many comments here and elsewhere on the internet suggesting these pair should be raped in prison are reprehensible. What's wrong with you people?

    1. Re:DSFR by rivetgeek · · Score: 1

      You're wrong. Their latest code didn't exploits myspace programming, rather it was nothing more than a phishing scam.

  69. Grammar not Grammer by M0b1u5 · · Score: 1

    And YOU shall be known by your atrocious spelling!

    --
    How many escape pods are there? "NONE,SIR!" You counted them? "TWICE, SIR!"
  70. "Teens" by inactivist · · Score: 1
    First of they are not teens. 18 and 19 makes them adult in america doesn't it?

    The media love to throw "teen" into the story title when it jazzes up the story and ups the emotion quotient. Just like some count 19 year olds as 'children' in statistics when it produces the desired results.

    "teen" and "MySpace.com" are 'hot button' words these days.

  71. Do not be quick to judge by shkpt · · Score: 1

    I am surprised to see so many uninformed comments on this topic. How can so many of you be prepared to condemn these guys on the basis of a single AP article, the basis of which was a statement from the District Attorney's office? And how can you take everything their office says as gospel truth, while dismissing a defense attorney's statement as simply a desperate attempt to get his client off? Rememer, the prosecutors are attorneys too (that's why they them District "Attorneys"), and they have agendas of their own. Keep in mind who has the burden of proof here. You might all do well to discuss the issues surrounding the case (e.g. the technical and legal issues) without jumping to conclusions about the facts of a pending criminal case or the guilt or innocence of those involved. This is a new case, and there is a lot that has not yet had time to come to light. Give it time.