Slashdot Mirror


Card Locks Thwarted by Shopping Club Card

hal9000(jr) writes "A recent column ('Social Engineering, the Shoppers' Way') on darkreading.com shows how easy it is for a pen test team to walk into a supposedly secure facility using a shoppers club card because the man trap feature was enabled. Man-traps allow people to enter an outer door but not an inner door similar to ATM kiosks. Once inside, of course, they had the run of the place." Lessons: after writing down your password, eat your sticky notes rather than leave them on the monitor.

361 comments

  1. Wrong kind of trap by HugePedlar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Should have used caltraps instead of mantraps.

    --
    Argh.
    1. Re:Wrong kind of trap by Rachel+Lucid · · Score: 1

      One, this is completely inane.

      And two... it's caltrOps! And what would a bunch of tacks do to improve security anyway? I mean, sure, in a dungeon it'd work, but still...

    2. Re:Wrong kind of trap by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > > Should have used caltraps instead of mantraps.
      >
      > One, this is completely inane.
      >
      > And two... it's caltrOps! And what would a bunch of tacks do to improve security anyway? I mean, sure, in a dungeon it'd work, but still...

      And three, typos make the trapmaster cry.

    3. Re:Wrong kind of trap by ozmanjusri · · Score: 3, Funny
      And what would a bunch of tacks do to improve security anyway?

      You could nail the door shut.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    4. Re:Wrong kind of trap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent funny... please? I liked the joke.

  2. Wtf by Poromenos1 · · Score: 0

    Don't they actually CHECK the card? What, the system just read the card, saw it wasn't empty and let them in? That's like typing some stuff in the console and the OS logging you on. How did that happen?

    --
    Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    1. Re:Wtf by HugePedlar · · Score: 1

      FTA: "We later learned that the door access system had been mistakenly set to use a feature called "man-trap," which enables banks to secure their ATM machines while allowing access to customers of other banks. Most magnetic stripe systems have this capability."

      So yes, misconfigured. But such a configuration has its uses in some situations like, as in the example, ATM vestibules.

      --
      Argh.
    2. Re:Wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like any ATM. It just checks that the card has a mag stripe on it. You can get into an ATM with a calling card, shoppers card, credit card, etc... anything with a magnetic stripe on it.

  3. Works for me by Knytefall · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Where I work, one of my friends was able to use his shopper's club card to get access to doors he didn't have access to, but I did. I thought the odds of that happening must be astronomical, but apparently it's more common than I thought.

  4. RTFA by MustardMan · · Score: 4, Informative

    TFA answers your question - most card reading entry systems have a feature which will allow any ATM card to open the door, because these systems are often used to secure ATM machines, and banks want people from other banks to be able to use their machine and pay the 2.00 service charge.

    Maybe next time, instead of trying to get a first post by asking a question based solely on skimming the summary, you'll RTFA?

    1. Re:RTFA by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1

      Uhh, I did RTFA. Having a man-trap feature doesn't mean allowing everyone. It should still check for valid cards. Otherwise, they should have just left the door open.

      --
      Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    2. Re:RTFA by Billosaur · · Score: 1
      TFA answers your question - most card reading entry systems have a feature which will allow any ATM card to open the door, because these systems are often used to secure ATM machines, and banks want people from other banks to be able to use their machine and pay the 2.00 service charge.

      And the sad part is, that is pretty poor security, since I've never seen a system whereby when there is a single ATM, the system keeps others from swiping their cards and enterring while you're at the ATM. Anybody else can amble right in, peek over your shoulder, etc. Sure, there's a video camera, but it's usually set at an angle that allows it to only view the person standing at the machine, making it easy to stay out of range. The better ones have cameras mounted up high to capture all that's going on inside the booth.

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    3. Re:RTFA by MustardMan · · Score: 1, Informative

      And how exactly should it check for valid cards? Should it have a record of every single ATM card on the planet? Should it know some sort of ID code for every single bank? Or, should it search for some string that's common in all ATM cards, and very well might exist in other cards, too, like, say, a grocery store discount card that carries personal information about its user?

      Either way - you've made a gross assumption that is in no way backed up by any factual information, and phrased in such a way that, no matter what you insist, I doubt you did RTFA.

    4. Re:RTFA by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1

      Then, like I said: Leave the door open.

      --
      Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    5. Re:RTFA by ipfwadm · · Score: 1

      And how exactly should it check for valid cards?

      Umm, maybe the same way the ATM checks for valid cards? (Though not being in the banking industry, I don't know if there's any way to verify an account number without having the PIN)

    6. Re:RTFA by profet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They also don't want homeless people sleeping in the warm atm room.

    7. Re:RTFA by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      The only purpose is to keep the bums from setting up home in there.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    8. Re:RTFA by TheGreek · · Score: 1
      And how exactly should it check for valid cards?
      Just imagine if only the data on the magnetic stripe of ATM, debit, and credit cards had a well-defined structure that allowed them to be read by different types of machines built by different manufacturers and used by different banks and processing companies.

      Wouldn't that be cool?
    9. Re:RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either way - you've made a gross assumption that is in no way backed up by any factual information, and phrased in such a way that, no matter what you insist, I doubt you did RTFA.

      The article (and summary) describe it badly. The problem is that the card reader is in ATM mode.

      A man-trap means that you can only open the inner door when the outer door is closed. You can still check for authorized cards at the inner & outer doors.

    10. Re:RTFA by B11 · · Score: 1

      Wait, actually RTFA before posting, unpossible!

      --
      insert inflammatory anti-microsoft comment here
    11. Re:RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      TFA answers your question - most card reading entry systems have a feature which will allow any ATM card to open the door, because these systems are often used to secure ATM machines, and banks want people from other banks to be able to use their machine and pay the 2.00 service charge.
      How about you read the article again, then. He did not use an ATM card. He used a shopping card from a grocery store.
    12. Re:RTFA by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, checking for a valid ATM card is impossible.

      There is no ATM or even credit card standard; it's just a unique identifier linked to your account in the bank's databases. You can use ANY magstripe card you have as an ATM card. Just go to the bank and ask them.

      My bank did this for me when I lost my ATM card and needed cash. I went in, showed my picture ID, and they recorded my Student ID card as my ATM card. I could then stick it in an ATM and withdraw money. The guy explained that it was a lot faster than mailing me a new ATM card and that they could do it with any card that wasn't already linked to a bank account.

    13. Re:RTFA by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

      The account number is not stored on the card, and there is no way to validate without a PIN. The number recorded on the card is meaningless without a database to link it to your real bank account.

    14. Re:RTFA by Cheile · · Score: 1

      The other reason is that it would be highly uncomfortable and potentially very dangerous to have someone asking for money from someone getting money out of an ATM.

    15. Re:RTFA by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      If the system allowed one entry at a time, people would use it to fuck, shoot up, or sleep. Or just swipe in and close the door, blocking access for no reason.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    16. Re:RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How about you RTFA and try to comprehend what it is saying. They explain it reads a card and allows anyone to access the door. If you had the common sense of a dead pigeon you would understand the main purpose of a system set in this mode is not to read the information off the card and decipher it. The main purpose is to make sure one door is shut before another door opens.

      Maybe Elmo can teach it in terms you would understand.

    17. Re:RTFA by lazarusdishwasher · · Score: 1

      have a 5 minute timeout with that resets the countdown with any keypress on the atm and unlocks the door on exit regardless of time remaining.

    18. Re:RTFA by bluekanoodle · · Score: 1

      Actually, according to TFA, the man trap feature was not supposed to be enabled in the first place, and was subsequently fixed, so now there is no need to check for valid credit cards.

    19. Re:RTFA by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      Either way - you've made a gross assumption that is in no way backed up by any factual information, and phrased in such a way that, no matter what you insist, I doubt you did RTFA.

      Yet his basic point is valid - if any freaking card will open the door, and everyone has some kind of card, why have a door? Appearances? Why not have a door with a fake card reader? It would be cheaper and do the same thing.

    20. Re:RTFA by radarsat1 · · Score: 1

      Didn't that ruin your student card?
      No library for YOU!!

    21. Re:RTFA by lerxstz · · Score: 2, Funny

      maybe this is a dumb question but...seeing as you were at the bank anyway, wouldn't it have been easier for them to just give you some money?

      --
      I chose to end my comments, not with a rim shot, but a long decaying F#7sus4
    22. Re:RTFA by ipfwadm · · Score: 1

      My point was that obviously the ATM has no problem validating the account, so in theory the door should be able to do the same. It's not like the door couldn't have access to whatever database the ATM uses. But if it can't be done without the PIN, then it's a moot point, since entering the PIN twice (once at the door, once at the ATM) is rather inconvenient.

    23. Re:RTFA by Politburo · · Score: 1

      When I got my ATM card, they had blanks and a writer. No mail necessary.

      Furthermore, what about the info on your student ID? At my alma mater, the info is used to swipe into dining halls, computer labs, libraries, and can serve as a debit card.

    24. Re:RTFA by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Yes, idiot, there is a standard data structure. However, there's nothing in the ATM that can tell if the ACTUAL DATA is valid.

    25. Re:RTFA by Seavy629 · · Score: 1

      ATM mantraps open if it reads anything off the magnetic strip. They aren't configured to lock certain cards out, all cards will be let in, whether it an ATM card, time badge, credit card, etc. The ATM actually reads the information and connects to a database or whatever it links to. As someone else said, the ATM mantrap just keeps homeless people or people that don't have any magnetic strip cards out.

    26. Re:RTFA by jrumney · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is no ATM or even credit card standard;

      Yes there is, and has been for years. Banks derive a lot of income from the charges on other banks' customers using their machines, and their customers using other banks' machines, so it is in their interest to follow the standard. There is also a standard for magstripe cards, which is why you can encode your bank details on almost any magstripe card, often without interfering with what was there before (as long as it wasn't another bank card, or a non-standard card with non-bank information on track 2).

    27. Re:RTFA by LupusUF · · Score: 1

      some schools put an extra strip on the card to be used to put bank info. I went to University of Florida, and they did that. You could take it into the bank, and have them put your info on the second strip. Your ID card would then work as a Student ID and a bank card.

    28. Re:RTFA by Metzli · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, the man-trap feature could be quite useful if properly implemented. If you had an external door with this enabled on a badge reader and a room separated from the inside with an internal door that had this disabled on a badge reader, this could trap the intruder (you know, a man trap). The intruder gets through the outside door and can't get through the inside one. If you have a badge reader that's needed to exit (w/o the man-trap feature enabled), then the intruder is now stuck in the room with no way in or out. This is a variation of the classic man-trap and allowing effectivly everyone from the outside is part of the configuration.

      --
      "It's too bad stupidity isn't painful." - A. S. LaVey
    29. Re:RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      What?!? Have you ever worked software for a credit institution or a bank? The mag stripe is defined, if it wasn't Washington Mutual wouldn't be able to read Bank Of America. Same with credit cards, it VISA has a predefined strip. How the heck do you think that a BoA atm maching knows that my name is John Smith even though I have a Wells Fargo card, because there IS a standard.

      These standards aren't exactly handed out at the local book store, but they do exist. If the atm inside the man-trap serves Star, CoOp, Plus, and so on type cards, the little reader outside could make sure that the card swiped was valid. If you stick your super market card into an ATM it doesn't try every bank it knows until it finds a match, it recognizes that the card is invalid. The little card reader could do that as well.

    30. Re:RTFA by TermV · · Score: 1

      How does a random ATM know the difference between your bank of wherever card and a grocery store discount card? Apparently you think that's impossible. There would be some information on a bank card that identifies you as a patron of a bank that has access to one of the online banking networks (Cirrus, Interac, Maestro).

    31. Re:RTFA by Golias · · Score: 1

      Any keypress? No. Require that they enter 4 8 15 16 23 42... every 108 minutes. :)

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    32. Re:RTFA by TheGreek · · Score: 1
      However, there's nothing in the ATM that can tell if the ACTUAL DATA is valid.
      Perhaps not.

      But I bet Kroger's doesn't use the same format Bank of America does.
    33. Re:RTFA by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Then, like I said: Leave the door open."

      You know...the more I've been reading in this thread it comes to mind that I don't believe I have EVER seen an ATM behind a locked door.

      Are there places where you have to swipe your ATM card just to open the door to get to the ATM? Where do they do this in the US?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    34. Re:RTFA by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1
      Are there places where you have to swipe your ATM card just to open the door to get to the ATM? Where do they do this in the US?

      Have you ever been to a city like, say New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Boston, or Seattle? Just about every major city I've been to has a set-up like that. You must first swipe your card just to get into a lobby-like area where the ATMs are located. I live about 25 miles outside of New York in suburban NJ and almost all the local banks are set up like this.

    35. Re:RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in the UK (and everywhere I'd of thought) an ATM works with certain card schemes - VISA, Delta, Electron, Maestro etc. Each of this incorporate some number usually 16 digits long. You can verify if that 16 digit number is valid for one of the card schemes supported by the ATM if you really want to lock out most cards that wouldn't work in the ATM itself from the lobby.

    36. Re:RTFA by Gospodin · · Score: 1

      I see you're missing the point, which is that without validating the data, it's easy to spoof the data structure. So what's the point of checking something that can so easily be spoofed?

      --
      ...following the principles of Heisenburger's Uncertain Cat...
    37. Re:RTFA by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      There's a big difference between using your CVS extracare discount card and using a personally hacked card encoded by your own programmable cardswipe. make it harder for crooks.

    38. Re:RTFA by Ced_Ex · · Score: 2, Funny

      The other reason is that it would be highly uncomfortable and potentially very dangerous to have someone asking for money from someone getting money out of an ATM.

      Yeah, that would suck. I guess you wouldn't be able to use the excuse "Sorry, I don't have any money on me at the moment."

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    39. Re:RTFA by Danga · · Score: 1

      maybe this is a dumb question but...seeing as you were at the bank anyway, wouldn't it have been easier for them to just give you some money?

      This is a dumb question because by having his student card instantly turned into an ATM card he has something to use until his new ATM card is mailed to him (if he even had a new one mailed). I know when I was in college I used the ATM's every 1-2 days, I didn't want to walk around with more money than I had to and since most campuses I have been to have ATM's all over the place it just was easier and safer to do it that way rather then withdraw a larger amount of cash and not have to hit up the ATM's as often.

      --
      Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
    40. Re:RTFA by Danga · · Score: 1

      Yet his basic point is valid - if any freaking card will open the door, and everyone has some kind of card, why have a door?

      Before this article did you know that swiping any card would open the ATM door? I sure didn't and I bet most people assume some type of ATM card is needed to gain access. So it is better to have the locked door because it does keep the homeless people out who probably don't have anything to swipe and even if they do they most likely don't realize they can use just any mag stripe card to get in. I don't know about you but I would much prefer to have a locked door that needs something to open it rather than an always unlocked door. Not so much for the reason of preventing a potential robbery (since the robber just has to wait for you to exit the mantrap) but for the reason of keeping the homeless person a decent distance from me while I am getting my money, it would be uncomfortable to have them begging for some cash say 2 feet to the left of the ATM I am trying to use.

      --
      Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
    41. Re:RTFA by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm finding this highly improbable. I'm not saying you don't believe that's what they said, but there has to be more to it than that.

      Back in 1998, I visited the US for the first time (I'm British.) I needed more cash, so I went to an ATM in the middle of Boston, put in my card, and withdrew some money. When I came back to Britain, and got my next bank statement, the charge showed up. Which is what you'd expect.

      I'm finding it just a little bit difficult to believe that this would have been possible if the ATM had to search through a database containing EVERY BANK CARD IN THE WORLD, essentially made up of arbitrary card numbers, to find out which bank account my card refered to. I can't imagine why anyone would implement something that likely to be the victim of database synchronization and duplicate number errors.

      It's notable that there is an official format for financial cards which works the way most of us would expect such a thing to work, identifying features such as account numbers and institution dependent features.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    42. Re:RTFA by evil_Tak · · Score: 1

      Have you ever been to a city like, say New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Boston, or Seattle?

      I've been to a city like, say Tampa, Miami, Dallas, Houston, or Atlanta, and I've never encountered these. Maybe they only have them where it's cold...

    43. Re:RTFA by FLEB · · Score: 1

      It's minimal security where only minimal security is needed. At banks, these are just on the outside set of doors, to protect the ATMs from people who abolutely, positively shouldn't be there. The inner set of doors to the bank proper, and the ATM itself, are well-secured to prevent theft and break-in. The front-door checks are just to discourage people sleeping in the booth and (I would imagine) to prevent or stall muggings at the ATM.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    44. Re:RTFA by markwalling · · Score: 2, Interesting

      or they could have just used the student info on the mag stripe as the identifier to the account. at the resturant i used to work at, we had added access control for the registers through the swipe reader we had for the credit cards. the company sent us 5 cards, but the owner was too lazy and cheap to buy more, so we used our own mag stripe cards for access (i used my grocery store card, one of my coworkers used his credit card...). it didn't write new data to the card, it just memorized what was already there. lots of fun for discovering whats on your bank cards... also there are credit card standards. the big 3 credit card brands (Visa/MC, Novus, AmEx) all use checksums on the number so that the POS can check to see if the card could exist before it dials in (because some people still use dialup for credit cards).

      --
      ...For the beast had been reborn with its strength renewed, and the followers of Mammon cowered in horror.
    45. Re:RTFA by FLEB · · Score: 1

      For mine they didn't even have a writer. They just did it DMV-style: Hand me one off the top of the stack, then associate that number (pre-written to the card) with my account. Of course, the credit-compatible card came in the mail later, but at least this allowed me to use the ATM and access cash.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    46. Re:RTFA by jferris · · Score: 1

      I am no banking expert, but I would imagine granting these systems access to financial records would both greatly put said information more easily into the hands of people who shouldn't have access and require federal regulations, as banks use for the interchange of data (such as how you can get money from one ATM while banking at another bank).

      --
      You are in a maze of little twisting passages, all different.
    47. Re:RTFA by evil_Tak · · Score: 1

      That's a great idea - glass ATM booths for prostitutes! Simultaneous prostitution and pornography!

    48. Re:RTFA by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Have you ever been to a city like, say New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Boston, or Seattle"

      Well, I must admit, no, I've not been to many cities at all up north, but, I've been to major ones in the South, SE and SW, like Dallas, Houston, Tucson, Phoenix, New Orleans....etc...and never seen you have to swipe an ATM card to get into the ATM area. For that matter, I'd say about half the ATM's you go to around here are not even indoors..they are on the outside wall of the banks...you just walk up and use the ATM.

      I like the indoors ones when it is really hot since they are air condiditoned...but, much of the time, I either walk up to one not in an enclosure, or do the drive through ATM things....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    49. Re:RTFA by ipfwadm · · Score: 1

      Huh? Perhaps I misinterpreted the person I originally replied to, but I'm talking about limiting the door to the bank to only open to folks with a valid ATM card, so that putting in your grocery store shopping card won't work. The bank already has access to financial records, so that's clearly not a problem.

    50. Re:RTFA by LunaticTippy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Access to funds would be quite convenient.
      Free advertising for potential customers, too.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    51. Re:RTFA by merreborn · · Score: 1

      The only way the GP's story makes any sense is if he was a client of some tiny credit union that used non-standard cards. As a result, this student ID bank card would *only* work at said tiny credit union.

    52. Re:RTFA by Tyger · · Score: 1

      One of my credit union branch offices in Silicon Valley has such a setup. The others do not. It's the only place I can think of off the top of my head that I have seen it.

    53. Re:RTFA by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      Before this article did you know that swiping any card would open the ATM door? I sure didn't and I bet most people assume some type of ATM card is needed to gain access. So it is better to have the locked door because it does keep the homeless people out who probably don't have anything to swipe and even if they do they most likely don't realize they can use just any mag stripe card to get in.

      At best, that's security by obscurity. I'd say that anyone in the business of knowing that (ie, thieves and such) would take the trouble to learn. Also, one could still use a fake card reader with a real door and save the money.

    54. Re:RTFA by Tyger · · Score: 1

      Sure, the bank does, at a minimum through the ATM. But the ATM is a very specific and more importantly secure environment. Just because the ATM has access to account information does not mean it is a good idea for other unrelated systems to have the same access. Any security expert would cringe at the concept of needlessly linking systems together that have different requirements of security level. The man trap needs only minimal security, since in practice nearly everyone has access. The ATM needs maximum levels of security since the access is narrowed down to an individual account and money as well as financial records are at risk.

      And there is very likely strict regulations on what the account information accessed can be used for and who/what can gain access to it, to prevent the risk of fraud and misuse of the information. Even if using it for access to the ATM area seems like it would be within the spirit of such regulations, unless it is to the letter of the regulations, it is not allowed.

    55. Re:RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually a lot of bank branch locations these days do not do cash transactions. This specific branch was a service only location, all you could do there was open an account or do account-related stuff, no money involved. There was an ATM just outside for that.

    56. Re:RTFA by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      i see two reasons for having a card reader.

      1: anyone who has legitimate reason to enter will have a card many people (especially kids, homeless who might try to use it as a shelter etc) who are likely to be unwelcome won't. cutting down the number of bad guys and not the good guys is a win even if you don't stop every bad guy.
      2: you could possiblly design it to log cards read for the purpose of tracking down troublemakers (if that is they use a bank card and not something else that happens to satisfy it). Even if you don't do so troublemakers don't know if you are doing so or not.

      as for a fake unit if the card reader didn't actually open/unlock the door people would spot it pretty quick. once you make it complex enough to open the door its probablly just as easy to use a real reader (they aren't that expensive)

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    57. Re:RTFA by MightyTater · · Score: 1

      The Real End Of Late Fees

    58. Re:RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good luck trying to get Wells Fargo or any other reasonably-sized bank to take your Student ID and turn it into an ATM card.

      And what do you think the moron checkout clerk at Walmart is going to do when you swipe your Student ID and tell them you want to use ATM Debit. They'll go beserk, have you arrested, just like the guy who used the $2 bill to pay for his kid's car stereo at Best Buy...

      http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/08/22 13237&tid=98

    59. Re:RTFA by Politburo · · Score: 1

      You know.. thinking back, I don't think there was a writer either. It was actually a reader to pull the pre-written number off the card and associate it with my account, as you describe.

    60. Re:RTFA by Doug-W · · Score: 1

      Until the first person counters the threat of criminal traspass with that of false imprisonment.

    61. Re:RTFA by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't know about the grandparent poster, but my student cards has a magnetic stripe that isn't used for anything. The library uses the barcode printed on the front of the card, the financial office just enters your student number manually (since it's not encoded into barcode number), and door locks use a different card.

    62. Re:RTFA by loraksus · · Score: 1

      Name, account number, etc is also on the card in cleartext, so it isn't like it hits a db to pull that. Played with a serial based card reader a while ago, much fun.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    63. Re:RTFA by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      Security through obscurity, while weak, sometimes works in the physical world because the number of potential attackers, as well as the means to spread information about a successful attack, is much more limited than it is on the Internet. Most Slashdot readers now know that those card "locks" will take any card, but I don't think that will have a significant impact on the effectiveness of the system.

    64. Re:RTFA by Danga · · Score: 1

      I wasn't saying it could keep thieves out, I was specifically saying it would act as a deterrant to keep homeless people a distance away from people trying to use the ATM. Most people think you need an ATM card to open the door, so if they don't have one they might give the door a tug and see it is locked and then take off. If there was no lock on the door then a homeless person would try to open the door and get right in, if the door was locked they couldn't get in unless they had a card to swipe. Yes, it is shitty security through obscurity but it is better than no lock at all since at least a person needs a mag swipe card.

      I lived for 3 years in an area that had a high homeless population and not having homeless people 2 feet away from me staring at the money and asking for some of it every time I was finishing up a transaction at an ATM would have been really nice and having a keycard access type of setup works really well for that. If there are people hanging out inside the mantrap then security can kick them out of there while security can't do anything about people hanging out right next to an ATM that is on the sidewalk (which most of the ATMs were where I lived). Sure, you might say security could do the same thing with an unlocked door but that is not the point, the point is that the amount of incidents of people getting inside who shouldn't be inside would be much, much less by forcing the person to have some type of mag swipe.

      --
      Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
    65. Re:RTFA by BattleApple · · Score: 0

      Is it really that hard for a would-be mugger or a homeless person to get their hands on a grocery store discount card? Doesn't sound like a very good deterrent to me.

    66. Re:RTFA by HorsePunchKid · · Score: 1
      These standards aren't exactly handed out at the local book store, but they do exist.
      This isn't exactly a complete specification of the standard, but if you've ever been curious about how much and roughly what a magstripe card can encode, it's worth a look.
      --
      Steven N. Severinghaus
    67. Re:RTFA by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1
      Hmm.. Interesting point. I used to live in Houston and I spent a lot of time in Dallas and New Orleans, and I don't remember seeing any of the ATM enclosures. Maybe it has to do with the weather; these ATM lobbies would be a nice place for a bum to sleep when it's cold outside. I know in Houston all the bums hang out under the freeways near the downtown area.

      I lived in L.A. for several years and I only remember seeing one or two of the lobbies, and they were in downtown L.A. Nearly all of the other ATMs (at banks that aren't in downtown L.A.) were on the sides of the buildings.

      Sorry, I didn't really mean to sounds like a smart ass in my first reply.

    68. Re:RTFA by Skjellifetti · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, If there are no standards, then what are the IATA, ABA, and TTS standards for the three tracks on a mag stripe card? And how do ATMs recognize which bank the card and account number are linked to. I'll bet the bank routing number must be stored in a standard spot on the card - likely it is somewhere in the 19 digit account number in the ABA track. Better hope that your Uni wasn't using that track for some local purpose, because the bank probably had to encode that info wiping out whatever was already there.

      While the standards are ISO standards, it is clear that, like all standards, there is wiggle room. I once tried to use a US ATM card in a German ATM. The US uses 4 digit pin codes while the German ATM demanded that I give it a 6 digit code.

    69. Re:RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually ATM is faster. As if you go into a bank they do not just give you cash. You need to write a check out, wait in line, show id, etc...

      ATM+pin = speed.

    70. Re:RTFA by BigLug · · Score: 1

      Skjellifetti says:
      > While the standards are ISO standards, it is clear that, like all standards, there is wiggle room. I once tried to use a US ATM card in a German ATM. The US uses 4 digit pin codes while the German ATM demanded that I give it a 6 digit code.

      Your PIN isn't on your card in any way, shape or form. If it were, deciphering the encryption would be (relatively) easy as even in Germany there's only 100,000 possibilities. To decrypt: Get ATM card, get info from mag stripe. Go to bank, change PIN and nothing else. Rinse, repeat. Each time noting what changed. You've now worked out which piece of the data is your PIN. Next do weird mumbo jumbo and get your PIN back out. Steal someone else's card and get their PIN using your algorithm.

      What happens is you stick your card in the machine. It has info on it telling the machine which bank the card belongs to. The ATM (or probably the ATM's bank's central server) sends the entered PIN to the card's bank for verification (without knowing, I'd promise it works that way .. security-wise it would be stupid for your bank to send the real PIN to the ATM)

      Here in Australia some banks have 4 digits, some have 6 and some let you choose. Every ATM requires that you hit the enter button when you're finished .. I'm *very* surprised that German ATMs don't allow 4-digits. If they don't then they're not on the Maestro (or is it the Cirrus) network.

      Cheers!
      Rick Measham

    71. Re:RTFA by Jayjay75 · · Score: 1

      I live in Seattle and I've never seen one or heard of one of these. We still have ATMs on the outside wall of banks, right out in the open.

    72. Re:RTFA by redcane · · Score: 1

      Valid cards have a simple check sum on the magnetic stripe. It's an algorithm, you don't need to know every single valid cards number to do *some* validation. It's easy enough to make a card that passes this simple checksum if you have a card writer. Of course ATM cards have certain formats, compared to say, motoring club cards, but my motoring club card passes the ATM kiosk test (which arguably it shouldn't).

    73. Re:RTFA by packeteer · · Score: 1

      Walk through downtown seattle on 3rd Avenue. You will see several entrances to ATM's that you need to swipe your card to get into. I think at 3rd & University there are 2 of these ATM room's across the street from each other but i could be wrong about the cross street.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    74. Re:RTFA by JKConsult · · Score: 1

      Well, there are homeless people elsewhere. Here in Austin, one of the major homeless and panhandler hangouts is "The Drag", which is Guadalupe St. running alongside the UT campus. I'm a Bank One customer. Guess where the Bank One is? You got it, ATM right on the drag.

      You just learn that you don't have to have excuses, and that it's much easier to just say "No."

    75. Re:RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, dickhead...maybe it's nap time for you? Do you need a nappy-time, little baby? You've probably been hiding and waiting for the chance to slam someone for not RTFA ever since the time you were so humiliated for your first offense. Way to go! We need more `spotters` like you! Good one! Really called him out then, eh mate?!

    76. Re:RTFA by lerxstz · · Score: 1

      Interesting. They don't have those type of bank branches where I live (they're all "full service"). Probably more common in large urban centers I'd imagine.

      --
      I chose to end my comments, not with a rim shot, but a long decaying F#7sus4
    77. Re:RTFA by MLease · · Score: 1

      Is it really that hard for a would-be mugger or a homeless person to get their hands on a grocery store discount card? Doesn't sound like a very good deterrent to me.

      I don't think it is. There was one time, several years ago, that I stopped off on my way home at an isolated ATM near where I worked (IIRC, it was a stand-alone ATM belonging to my bank). As I was pulling up, I noticed a couple of young guys sitting around and chatting in the enclosure. Initially, I didn't think anything of it; but as I walked toward the door, I saw them look in my direction and stand up. Alarm bells went off in my head and I turned around, got back in my car, and drove to a branch of the bank that was open; I notified the personnel of the situation at the ATM, before taking out the money I'd planned on. I don't know how they got in, but I have a feeling I would have been a mugging victim if I'd ignored my suspicions and continued on with my errand. In any event, the card reader obviously didn't keep them out.

      -Mike

      --
      I'm sorry; I don't know what I was thinking!
    78. Re:RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, you haven't been paying attention when watching Seinfeld.

    79. Re:RTFA by Skjellifetti · · Score: 1

      I didn't mean to imply that the pin was kept on the card. That would not be the brightest thing. I was just surprised by the use of a 6 digit pin since I'd assumed that the ATM interchange standards used some kind of standardized message protocol with a standard pin length. And since the German bank's ATM had the same interchange logo as my card, I was not happy when it refused to work. I'm glad we don't have 6 digit pins in the US. I can barely remember 4.

      An occasional scam seen in the US is for a crook to buy an ATM and put it in a convenience store where it is happy to disperse the requested cash after checking with your bank and claiming the usual small fee, etc. But it is also quietly saving your card details and the pin you used for later retrieval by the crook's technician.

    80. Re:RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How about you RTFA and try to comprehend what it is saying.
      I already read the article, and I know it wasn't an ATM card, as claimed.

      They explain it reads a card and allows anyone to access the door.
      Then why did MustardMan claim it was an ATM card. Simple, he was full of shit.

      If you had the common sense of a dead pigeon you would understand the main purpose of a system set in this mode is not to read the information off the card and decipher it. The main purpose is to make sure one door is shut before another door opens.
      No card at all would be required to accomplish that. You don't know what a man trap is (other than when you try to pick up your Johns at the gay bar), so please shut the hell up.

      Maybe Elmo can teach it in terms you would understand.
      You are the worst kind of idiot. You go through life not understanding what the hell you are talking about, yet you are oblivious to your own ignorance.
    81. Re:RTFA by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      I've noticed that in Shanghai there are "hybrids"- since the bank is only open until 6PM, they have a separate door for the ATM section that also has a cardlock. But- they don't respond to anything but a bank card- I tried with hotel keycards and a couple of department store discount cards- none of them worked. So why can't the US do that?

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    82. Re:RTFA by roie_m · · Score: 1

      Does it work with a bank/credit card from a different bank? If not, that's your answer: US banks want to support other banks' customers.

    83. Re:RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet his basic point is valid - if any freaking card will open the door, and everyone has some kind of card, why have a door?

      The card reader was misconfigured. It has since been properly configured. What the hell's so hard to understand about that?!?

    84. Re:RTFA by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Eh, you haven't been paying attention when watching Seinfeld."

      I've never seen Seinfeld....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    85. Re:RTFA by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      Prety sure it did- I was trying with a Bank of America card, and while they do have 1 branch in Shanghai, I tried this at a local bank- it seems like it should be impossible from what I hear, but it works.

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    86. Re:RTFA by HeroreV · · Score: 1

      Funny that you mention that. At the University of North Texas people can get a regular student ID card or a combo card that acts as a student ID, a Wells Fargo ATM card, and a Visa debit card. I thought it was a pretty interesting idea.

    87. Re:RTFA by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      My g/f lived in a Chicago suburb until she was 19 and she'd never heard of or seen anything like that. When I was visiting I was surprised how difficult it was to find an ATM with 24/7 access, other then gas stations or hotels, it usually meant standing in the drive through.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
  5. Just great. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 5, Funny

    And what's more, the security system added frequent shopper rewards to their card! Those lucky bastards are going to save so much money on their next purchases of orange juice and cat food.

    1. Re:Just great. by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      They could use the huge savings to build a button that makes it snow on the beach!

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  6. insecurity 101 by digitaldc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Maybe...

    1) Have a photo ID badge that is the only card that can be swiped to get in to the location
    2) Install fingerprint readers and cameras for employees to gain entry
    3) Lock all doors/locations not in use, & again use ID Badges and fingerprint readers to gain entry
    4) Have have all passwords on keychains updated every few minutes
    5) And finally, have all employees meet regularly so they know each other by name and by face

    Just a thought.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:insecurity 101 by TractorBarry · · Score: 1

      I bet you've either never seen, or have forgotten, this story already.

      Using fingerprints or other such biometric data to gain access to valuable resources is a very BAD idea. Until there's a sensor that can identify me, that I'm alive and well and not in any way stressed (no gun pressed into the small of my back etc. etc.) then the whole idea is a no no.

      --
      Sky subscribers are morons. They pay to be advertised at !
    2. Re:insecurity 101 by Intron · · Score: 4, Interesting

      One lab I consulted for had RFID badges so you just had to walk up the door to unlock it. Saved the hassle of getting a card out every time. Employees were trained not to let two people through on one activation (except legitimate visitors) and had a bulletin board with a picture and name of every employee.

      The most secure place I've been (bank IT center) had a vestibule that weighed you on the way in and out. If you were heavier or lighter, the door didn't open.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    3. Re:insecurity 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The most secure place I've been (bank IT center) had a vestibule that weighed you on the way in and out. If you were heavier or lighter, the door didn't open.
      What if you used the bathroom while inside?

    4. Re:insecurity 101 by MountainLogic · · Score: 4, Funny

      Better get a receipt every time you go to the bathroom

    5. Re:insecurity 101 by Intron · · Score: 2, Informative

      I knew someone would ask that. No bathrooms inside. No food allowed inside. Emergency exits all set off alarms and called police and fire. Deliveries were made through separate doors where all packages were inspected. It also kept track of whether you were in or out. Doors would not open if you tried to go in twice or out twice.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    6. Re:insecurity 101 by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was fingerprinted as part of my DOD security clearance at a DOD lab. At the time I had psoiasis on my fingers so my fingerprints were practically smooth from thickened skin. After it cleared up I doubt any prints they took would've been too useful.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    7. Re:insecurity 101 by Pulse_Instance · · Score: 1

      If you knew someone would ask that why didn't you explain it in your first post?

    8. Re:insecurity 101 by Valdrax · · Score: 0

      The most secure place I've been (bank IT center) had a vestibule that weighed you on the way in and out. If you were heavier or lighter, the door didn't open.

      I hope it had learning tolerances. Otherwise, that first 8-14 pounds in the first two weeks of a diet could label you a "troublemaker."

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    9. Re:insecurity 101 by tomlouie · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Make sure to get a receipt after every trip to the lavatory. Paraphrased from D. Adams.

    10. Re:insecurity 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if I get sick in a wastebasket? Or trim my toenails?

      You don't have to answer that, I'm just bustin on ya.

    11. Re:insecurity 101 by Kookus · · Score: 1

      Or we could just remove all the doors....

    12. Re:insecurity 101 by Surt · · Score: 1

      You think that kind of place has a bathroom on the inside?

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    13. Re:insecurity 101 by SparkEE · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The types of rolled ink fingerprints captured for security clearance purposes, and used in IAFIS, are very different from how a fingerprint reader at a door would work. Door lock fingerprint readers are generally pretty good about being insensitive to such issues. Most use some type of capacity array to read your print beyond your first layer of skin, so that things like scrapes, dust, etc are not factors. Some use optical arrays, which are pretty horrible though.

      I'm not advocating using fingerprint readers as a single source of security though. The technology isn't really quite there yet, but there's been a lot of progress in recent years. Even with a perfect non-spoofable fingerprint reader, to be really secure there has to be the "what you know" aspect used in conjuction.

    14. Re:insecurity 101 by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      Hey, sounds great, but what do they do in case of a fire? Can anyone pull a fire alarm, or do you have to RFID the fire alarm?

      Seems like a fire alarm system would be a weakness -- if you make it too secure, you kill people in a real fire, and if it's not strict enough, a real theif would exploit it to escape.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    15. Re:insecurity 101 by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't describe your 5 rules as a first-year class (101). that's for the most secure type of facility.

      #5 is the most general rule for security practices.

      I live in a pretty bad neighborhood in Brooklyn (the industrial parks of Bushwick) where we have hefty security keys to gain entry to our building and each floor. The risk associated with unauthorized access can be pretty great, and the probability of it happening is also very high.

      Unfortunately, there's over 50 apartments in the building, each with 2-5 people living in them, so there's probably around 150-200 people living there. It's impossible to know everyone's face. I only know, maybe, a dozen people in the building, and they're mostly on my floor because I see them pretty often. I feel like a total dick when I don't hold a door open for someone, but I feel that it's the safest thing to do. If someone started banging on the door once it shut and said they forgot their key, I'd probably use my best judgement to decide to let them in or not.

      In my situation, it's not feasible to have everyone wear ID tags. and the key is not readily identifiable to use that as proof of residence.

      The whole situation feels like that episode of seinfeld where he wouldn't let some guy into his building who forgot his key because he didn't recognize him. then Jerry ran into him several times over the next few days.

      unfortunately, physical security and common courtesy are mutually exclusive.

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    16. Re:insecurity 101 by digitaldc · · Score: 1

      It's impossible to know everyone's face.

      Maybe in an apartment building, but surely at a secure workplace. Look, I am no security expert but I do know you can memorize more than 200 faces.
      Just think of all the people you have met in your life (school, work, etc.,) I am sure it is well over 200 and you would recognize most in an instant.
      And don't feel bad for not holding open the door, that is how a friend of mine in Manhattan got tied up and robbed - by the same person they held the door open for.
      It is an insecure world, especially in New York City.

      --
      He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    17. Re:insecurity 101 by Karthikkito · · Score: 1

      The way it's described, their system doesn't use weight for identification, but instead, for verification that nothing's been brought in and left there, or brought out that wasn't with the person when s/he came in.

    18. Re:insecurity 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So as long as no-one thinks to take in an item of the same approximate weight (and no value) as the item they are going to remove, everything is nice and secure!

    19. Re:insecurity 101 by bungeejumper · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In the Time magazine out last week, they describe a condition affecting one in 50 people - this condition causes an inability to recognize faces, and in extreme cases, people cannot recognize their own face in a mirror !

    20. Re:insecurity 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cause, hey, its not like banks have any security guards or anything.

    21. Re:insecurity 101 by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 1
      For a company yes you can issue company IDs and have each person punch in a PIN or use a fingerprint reader. In some places we post a gard at the door to watch for things like "tail gating" or maybe some guy with a gun forsing an employee to let him in. In one facility there is a scale on the floor that tacks the total weight inside the room that is betawwen the inner and outter doors. In one other place I used to visit. after you got through the door with a badge and pass code. You had to hand the badge to a gard who then handed you another badge for use inside the building. The exchange with the gard force a human interaction.

      But the problem here is NOT the same. A bussines hopes to let in people they DO NOT KNOW. They want customers and more then that they want NEW customers they have not yet seen. You can't issue people you have never met an ID card. In this case because you WANT everyone to have access you are in no case ever to to not let someone in All you really are trying to do is record who is there with the idea that people will not commit a crime if they know they will by identified. All you need is a finger print sensor on the door or a camera that can detect a REAL face or maybe both.

    22. Re:insecurity 101 by Intron · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do you read the last page of mysteries first? I was waiting until I had all the suspects gathered in this room.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    23. Re:insecurity 101 by aevan · · Score: 1

      *cue Indiana Jones music

    24. Re:insecurity 101 by tchuladdiass · · Score: 1

      ## unfortunately, physical security and common courtesy are mutually exclusive

      The way I solve that at work is by using "closet uncourtesy". I avoid entering a secure door if there is someone close behind me (by adjusting my walking pace faster or slower, as needed). Therefore, there is no pressure to hold the door open for someone who isn't there.

    25. Re:insecurity 101 by Torontoman · · Score: 1

      The problem with finger readers is that they break down all the time. THen you have to call someone (usually an intelligent person of higher order) at security to let you in blah blah blah.

    26. Re:insecurity 101 by GWTPict · · Score: 1
      5) And finally, have all employees meet regularly so they know each other by name and by face

      In my case the total work force is approximately 25,000.....

    27. Re:insecurity 101 by evil_Tak · · Score: 1

      The types of rolled ink fingerprints captured for security clearance purposes, and used in IAFIS, are very different from how a fingerprint reader at a door would work. Door lock fingerprint readers are generally pretty good about being insensitive to such issues. Most use some type of capacity array to read your print beyond your first layer of skin, so that things like scrapes, dust, etc are not factors.

      This kind of flexibility, though, is the reason that most current fingerprint readers can be spoofed with Play-Doh[tm].

    28. Re:insecurity 101 by DarkSarin · · Score: 1

      There are situations that would violate that even with the most sophisticated sensor.

      That said, the place I work has a 'no unscanned bags' policy. I am certain that carrying a weapon into the area would cause all types of alarms to go off (unless you had a plastic or ceramic gun, but that's another story). Weigth sensors could record your weight and allow you in within a certain tolerance (say 25%), which would prevent an intruder from gaining access.

      In truly sensitive areas, bringing a guest to work isn't an option. For any areas where identification is the main concern, then a security guard is the best bet. For data access, there is no way to design a perfect system using current technology. Biometric is better than a lot of other methods. Bio+passcode is even better (yes, you might be dead, but if they haven't broken your code, then stealing your finger isn't going to be enough either).

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    29. Re:insecurity 101 by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 1

      or just make sure you're blasting music through your headphones so you don't even realize if you let the door slam in someone's face. ;)

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    30. Re:insecurity 101 by SparkEE · · Score: 1

      Most readers cannot be spoofed with Play-Doh[tm] anymore, but many are now susceptable to foil spoofs. There are some pretty interesting anti-spoof techniques being developed by some of the big players these days. I really think in a couple more years, fingerprint reader anti-spoof will be pretty tight and secure. If only patents didn't get in the way of merging concepts together, anti-spoof would be much further along.

    31. Re:insecurity 101 by Yewbert · · Score: 1

      Not to belabor the point (I know, too late already), but did the system account for, say, someone bringing in and depositing - or withdrawing - a huge pile of cash or, heavier yet, a huge jar of coins? Or was this weight-enforcement only on employees, who could be mandated to not do that kind of stuff on the job?

    32. Re:insecurity 101 by ashmon · · Score: 1

      To test this theory, go to the mall. Look for a group of 50 people. Realize that at least 1 of them has no idea who the hell you are. Put that sly grin on your face, resting assured you have a secret knowledge that none of them have.

    33. Re:insecurity 101 by Yewbert · · Score: 1

      Oh, duh - disregard that last comment - I'd missed the "bank IT center" bit in my haste. Makes a lot more sense that way.

    34. Re:insecurity 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll stick to the old method of using a finger off of the corpse.

    35. Re:insecurity 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      In the eventuality of regurgitation, the sick employee is expected to deposit the output in a plastic bag and carry it with him/her through the security door.

      Any employee with a cold is also expected to carry any tissues onto which he/she has deposited nasal mucus and/or phlegm.

      Sincerely,
      The Management

    36. Re:insecurity 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's pretty much how it is where I work. RFID badge reader at the entrance that's noisy as hell if you try to walk through it without swiping, card readers on all of the gates that enter to the back patio, a card reader to go from the back patio to the arcade (to prevent people from just jumping the fence), card readers on all doors that emit a piercing shriek if a door is left open for ~30 seconds, and security personnel who are totally anal retentive about not letting you in without a valid badge. If you forget your badge, you have to surrender your driver's license to security in exchange for a temp badge, and they verify that your name is in the system before handing over the temp badge. Additionally, the security station will read your badge when you get within a suitable proximity of it and kick your full employee profile + picture onto the screen for the security officer to peruse. Game companies are quite protective.

    37. Re:insecurity 101 by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      I worked at a place like this once...

      As a cost cutting measure, we had to use the
      receipt as toilet paper.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    38. Re:insecurity 101 by SparkEE · · Score: 1

      I hate to keep hitting a dead horse, but.....

      That's just another of the myth surrounding fingerprint readers. The reality is that a severed finger or hand has drastically different electrical properties than a live one, as well as a sort of deflation problem that makes it tough to get good print anyway. With anti-spoofing techniques like complex impedance, optical dispersion, and pulse (pressure) monitoring, the use of a corpse finger becomes detectable. That's probably little consilation to the security guard whose finger was just chopped off though. Remember too that a fingerprint reader is just detecting the presence of something you have. As with RFID or magnetic cards, this should be coupled with a pin or password.

    39. Re:insecurity 101 by Firefly1 · · Score: 1
      Until there's a sensor that can identify me, that I'm alive and well and not in any way stressed (no gun pressed into the small of my back etc. etc.)
      Heh, I seem to recall this entry technique being occasionally necessary in the various Splinter Cell games... Seriously, though, stress has many causes not all of which are nefarious in origin.
      --
      - White Knight of the Order of Mihoshi Enthusiasts
    40. Re:insecurity 101 by renoX · · Score: 1

      > weighed you on the way in and out

      Well I hope that there were video recorders too because otherwise I come in with a bucket of sand and a 'pese personne' (don't know how to say this in English), pick what I want, and ensure that my total weight stay the same easily.

  7. Wrong use of the word man-trap by petrilli · · Score: 5, Informative

    A man-trap, in the physical security world, is a "room" (loosely defined here) which has control points on both sides. Often you have to use two different forms of authorization, one for entry (i.e. a badge) and another for exit (biometrics, let's say). This allows it to *trap* anyone who tries to sneak through the system. What the article is really talking about is not a man-trap, but the anti-"bum" measures that banks use in many cities around ATMs inside a building. You have to put your ATM card into a slot, but it really doesn't read the card, it just verifies that you stuck a magstrip card into the slot. You then use your ATM card to access the ATM where it is presumably verified.

    Setting anything in this method is absurd, and the physical security people should be fired on the spot for this kind of kindergarten mistake. While what likely happened is that it was turned this way when installed so that you could teach people to use it without having to deal with the slowdown of people actually being blocked, it's a bad way to behave, and shouldn't have been even turned on the first time this way. It may also be that, in fact, it was turned this way because of a problem with reliability of magstripe cards (they fail pretty regularly), and instead the system should have been converted to another form of identification -- Wiegand, RF proxy, etc.

    1. Re:Wrong use of the word man-trap by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      Interesting - I always heard of such a set-up being called a "sallyport."

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    2. Re:Wrong use of the word man-trap by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

      The difference is whether you intend to go out or in via that door.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    3. Re:Wrong use of the word man-trap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ah...so a "man trap" traps a man (or woman I guess), which makes sense. What, then, does a booby trap do?

    4. Re:Wrong use of the word man-trap by umghhh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It is indeed a major mistake. Firing the responsible technician on the spot as you suggest will not do anything to increase security however. After all persons responsible were able to act on information provided - next time this method did not work. We do not have such certainity about their replacement.

      Not giving a chance for improvment is bad policy - the only thing it really does is alienate security people. It may be that next time they spot similar mistake they will not fix it in any official way fearing consequences and this can create bigger security problem then the one 'fixed' by firing squad.
      Alienated guards are bad guards.

    5. Re:Wrong use of the word man-trap by MrNougat · · Score: 3, Funny
      What, then, does a booby trap do?


      It would trap a particular kind of sea bird, or a not very smart person. Or maybe it's something else entirely.
      --
      Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
    6. Re:Wrong use of the word man-trap by loraksus · · Score: 1

      What the article is really talking about is not a man-trap, but the anti-"bum" measures that banks use in many cities around ATMs inside a building. You have to put your ATM card into a slot, but it really doesn't read the card, it just verifies that you stuck a magstrip card into the slot.

      Some of the "bum repelling devices" are a little more advanced and will read the frst
      few digits to verify that you are a customer of the barticular bank, etc, (a bit of a nuisance if you are drunk and looking to buy more alcohol and need to make a withdrawal ;) so it is a little more complex than you claim, but we can see how that isn't perfect.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    7. Re:Wrong use of the word man-trap by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      Banks in London used to have such a system - you swipe your ATM card to gain access. But then criminals started fitting their own card reader devices on the outside of the door and cloning cards (demonstrating yet again why it's a bad idea to have a card where mere knowledge of the card number is enough to authorize payment). So now they just have push-button entry systems.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    8. Re:Wrong use of the word man-trap by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Interesting
      but it really doesn't read the card, it just verifies that you stuck a magstrip card into the slot....It may also be that, in fact, it was turned this way because of a problem with reliability of magstripe cards (they fail pretty regularly), and instead the system should have been converted to another form of identification -- Wiegand, RF proxy, etc.
      One law office where I work had so much trouble with the mag-stripe reader on the back door that the head of security himself opened the thing up and wired the electric strike release directly to the microswitch that detects when a card's been inserted! This means that you can get in the back door with anything that fits in the slot, even a popsicle stick, a trick I throughly enjoy demonstrating every time I go there. I even keep a popsicle stick in the truck just for that purpose.

      Surprised guy who sits by back door: How'd you get in?
      Me: Popsicle stick (holding up popsicle stick)

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    9. Re:Wrong use of the word man-trap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "One law office where I work had so much trouble with the mag-stripe reader on the back door that the head of security himself opened the thing up and wired the electric strike release directly to the microswitch that detects when a card's been inserted!"

      So... the highest level of authority in that office who should know about this, is probably a partner in the law firm, and risks losing his license to practice law because of it... and you are still liable for a charge of B&E... and the head of security is an accessory to your B&E...

    10. Re:Wrong use of the word man-trap by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

      Perhaps fire the manager who approved the policy would be much better.

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    11. Re:Wrong use of the word man-trap by Dun+Malg · · Score: 3, Informative
      So... the highest level of authority in that office who should know about this, is probably a partner in the law firm, and risks losing his license to practice law because of it
      So far as I know, there's no requirement that your doors be locked to remain licensed to practice law. The door is deadbolted after hours, so it's not an issue after hours. Also, both partners are aware of the issue because I wave the damn popsicle stick at them as a reminder every time I'm there.

      ... and you are still liable for a charge of B&E...
      I suggest you go read the definition of B&E/Burglary. Basically, it is this:
      "entering a building or remaining unlawfully with intent to commit any crime"
      1) every time I'm there I am there at their request and am permitted to be in the area by the back door
      2) what crime? I'm there to make keys to file cabinets or reset the combination on their safe, again, at their request

      and the head of security is an accessory to your B&E...
      Where did you acquire your legal education? Television? An accessory must generally have knowledge that a crime is being, or will be committed. At most this could be considered negligence, but as such would only be grounds for dismissal or civil suit. But given that the partners know all about it and tactly approve, that's not even a sure thing.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    12. Re:Wrong use of the word man-trap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are not saying "this building was a man trap", they are saying the card reader system was set in man trap MODE, thereby allowing any card to get in. Some of you are pointing out this was not technically a man trap in order to show how smart you are. RTFA and if you can manage it, _Comprehend_TFA so you don't look like an ingoramus trying to sound smart.

    13. Re:Wrong use of the word man-trap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So far as I know, there's no requirement that your doors be locked to remain licensed to practice law. The door is deadbolted after hours, so it's not an issue after hours.

      I think (s)he was referring to confidentiality measures. An attorney must take adequate measures to ensure client confidence (including locking away the client files). You hadn't mentioned the dead-bolt before.

      In reality, about the only thing which would actually get you disbarred in most districts would be mis-handling client funds, and even that isn't guaranteed. The bar associations tend to protect their own, unless you're found grossly negligent.

    14. Re:Wrong use of the word man-trap by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, the rest of the security staff might be demotivated by seeing someone like that keep his job.

    15. Re:Wrong use of the word man-trap by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      I think (s)he was referring to confidentiality measures. An attorney must take adequate measures to ensure client confidence (including locking away the client files). You hadn't mentioned the dead-bolt before.
      (shrug). Doesn't make the "OMG U R guilty of B&E, dood" poster any less an idiot, unfortunately.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    16. Re:Wrong use of the word man-trap by Punboy · · Score: 1

      He's probably thinking of criminal negligence, not accessory. Should someone be allowed to enter the building without authorization due to a change in security measures by the head of security, and that person steal confidential information, that person can, in some states, be found criminally negligent.

      --
      If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
    17. Re:Wrong use of the word man-trap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would become a man-trap if it allowed access into a room, but whatever let you out was stricter. Of course hitting the fire alarm or causing a fire should hopefuly allow the door to open.

      An interesting thing in the article was the the Windows Domain was compromised in not much time by someone on the network. Windows domains are meant to be pretty secure with things like Kerberos. This one obviously wasn't.

    18. Re:Wrong use of the word man-trap by umkhhh · · Score: 1

      But that is assuming that there are only two choices: firing squad or no reaction at all and in all but most extreme situations there is plenty of other ways to handle such situations.

      I dare say that social skills(*) may be as important as technical means in this case: managing people that manage security is vital and limiting your own motivating choices to whip only is a great limitation indeed. It is better to have carrot, whip and all that there is between.
      This said one has to accept that sometimes drastic means are neccessary.

      * - by social skill I do not mean small talk and chating about weather of course. Not only anyway :)

  8. This is NOT a man trap by rbanzai · · Score: 0, Redundant

    A man trap lets you into a vestibule but does NOT let you into the main area without authentication of some kind.

    1. Re:This is NOT a man trap by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      RTFA - it was set on man trap mode without the second door. A config mistake.

  9. Don't buy it.... by SlashDev · · Score: 1

    I may be naive but I personally don't buy this story, how did they get Admin privileges? What, the Admin had his password on a post-it note too?

    --

    TOP DSLR Cameras Reviews of the top DSLRs
    1. Re:Don't buy it.... by mainframemouse · · Score: 1

      Some admins are stupid enough to use their company name as the admin log in.

      Or maybe used a password list

      Other way could be social engineering to get a basic User's login and escalate your privalidges from there.

      Vunriblities in software/services installed.

      and 101 ways I wouldn't even think off.

    2. Re:Don't buy it.... by Pontiac · · Score: 4, Interesting

      OK here an example from a recent pen test .

      Someone setup a test SQL server in the lab with access to the production netowork.

      Since it's "just a lab box" the SA password was left blank.

      at some point a domain admin logged into this box.

      The security team accessed the box with the local SA account.
      They got the LSASS password cache.

      With that they got the Domain Admin account.

      They used that to acccess a DC, got the SAM and used Rainbow crack with a 10gig pre compiled hash DB to get 30 out of 35 domain admin accounts.

      --
      If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur. --Red Adair
    3. Re:Don't buy it.... by Roody+Blashes · · Score: 0

      You're not so much naive as you are lacking in creative thinking. Squishy internal security is not uncommon, especially if a company has devoted a large amount of time to securing things on the outside. A very hard external shell often creates a false sense of security whereby people fail to secure against directly connected internal attacks, or attacks (and mistakes) from regular users.

      Bear in mind that they did not have to deal with trying to find vulnerabilities in external gateways and then try to wind their way into the center of the network, they STARTED in the center of the network.

      The fact that they were even able to get a network connection on a foreign laptop immediately suggests to me that the system is configured in a dangerous way, probably to allow management types to bring in either personal or company laptops that they take home and on business with a low level of security but a high level of convenience.

      --
      If you haven't foed me yet, what are you waiting for?
    4. Re:Don't buy it.... by oclawgeek · · Score: 1

      Some companies rely on physical security alone to protect data. I worked for a major wireless phone carrier after college. There were at least three different systems used for various functions performed by lowly customer service reps. One of the systems involved plain old telnet to a *nix system which allowed one limited ability to retrieve information from the switch (e.g., ESN/MIN) and to sometimes change information there, depending on the privs assigned to your user account. Obviously, anyone who managed to get physical access could get lots of passwords for various levels of users on that system (thanks for using telnet!), and leverage that to get additional privs on that system. I also know for a fact that the sysadmins at the company were idiots.

      --
      News Flash: Godzilla hates infrastructure.
    5. Re:Don't buy it.... by Pontiac · · Score: 1

      I got some updated info in this..

      I wasn't that they got the domain admin's domain acocunt information form the LSASS cache.

      He had created a local accout on the SQL lab server use the same username and password as his production domain admin account.

      --
      If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur. --Red Adair
  10. Single Entry door or Man Traps by nuggz · · Score: 4, Informative

    Man trap is a bit confusing.

    They are likely refering to a single person entry door.
    The problem I see is this may not suffice for disabled access.

    At first I thought man-trap would be they lock you in if anything goes wrong, the problem here would be a potentially devestating liability if there is any injury.
    Think about the lawsuit if someone got injured or killed (or mildly annoyed) if they were physically detained by an automated system.
    The wikipedia article indicates this issue.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man-trap

    1. Re:Single Entry door or Man Traps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To get out of the ATM mantrap, just remember the password - BOSCO

    2. Re:Single Entry door or Man Traps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think about the lawsuit if someone got injured or killed (or mildly annoyed) if they were physically detained by an automated system.

      Very true. But you have to look at the corporation's (read: soulless, bottom-line driven entity) point of view.

      Think about the stakes in terms of potential damage due to identity theft, data theft, loss of phyiscal property and the ensuing class-action suits that follow. I'm willing to bet that a hefty settlement for a single injury/DnD lawsuit would be far more economical than letting that guy run amok inside your data warehouse (or whatever).

    3. Re:Single Entry door or Man Traps by Secrity · · Score: 1

      The man trap in TFA is not the same as the man trap as described in the Wikipedia and I find a bit odd that the Wikipedia doesn't include an entry about the sort of man trap described in TFA. There websites that sell man traps such as are described in TFA at http://www.secureaccessportals.com/ and http://www.koubasystems.com/mantrapsys.html

    4. Re:Single Entry door or Man Traps by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      I think the term "man trap" itself originated with castles. The main gate would consist of an inner door and and outer door. Attackers getting past the outer door could be attacked (with rocks, burning coals, boiling water/oil, etc) in the confined space by defenders above them through holes in the floor.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    5. Re:Single Entry door or Man Traps by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Informative
      At first I thought man-trap would be they lock you in if anything goes wrong, the problem here would be a potentially devestating liability if there is any injury. Think about the lawsuit if someone got injured or killed (or mildly annoyed) if they were physically detained by an automated system.
      Yeah, you usually only find man-traps at places like Los Alamos National Laboratory, where the system is supervised by actual live security personel. A man-trap is really only worth the effort and expense of constant monitoring if you're running something like LANL, where if a guy tries to wander in with a found/stolen card, you don't want him to just be able to say "oh well, no secret stealing for me today" and just walk away.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    6. Re:Single Entry door or Man Traps by nuggz · · Score: 1

      The corporate decision of cheaper to do the wrong thing is why they are pushing criminal and personal liability to the officers of the corporation.

      It's easy to say the corporation can pay that so I don't care.
      When the people responsible are looking at losing their own money, or even serving jail time they tend to act in a somewhat more cautious manner.

  11. Once more, in English: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "A recent column (Social Engineering, the Shoppers' Way) on darkreading.com shows how easy it is for a penetration team to walk into a supposedly secure facility using a shoppers club card because the man trap was misconfigured. Man-traps allow people to enter an outer door but not an inner door similar to ATM kiosks. Once inside, they had the run of the place."

    1. Re:Once more, in English: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Today is one of those days where I really wish I had mod points, so I could mod this up.

  12. Just have someone carry a baby in carrier by slam+smith · · Score: 5, Informative

    My wife used to regularly get into my work buildings to meet me for lunch. You just need to carry a baby in a baby carrier and everyone will let you in.

    1. Re:Just have someone carry a baby in carrier by no_pets · · Score: 1

      Dressed as a pizza delivery man and carrying hot, aromatic pizza works, too.

      --
      "A government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned." - Shepard Book Quoting Malcolm Reynolds
    2. Re:Just have someone carry a baby in carrier by eln · · Score: 1

      Maybe it was because she was carrying a baby, or maybe it was because everyone recognized her as your wife because she was a regular visitor there. She should show up some time without the baby and see what happens. My suspicion is they'll let her in anyway because they recognize her by now.

      Of course, if your office isn't a particularly high security environment, it may just not matter that much if someone unauthorized makes it in. In that case (as with most ordinary office buildings), the security is there mainly for show and/or to intervene when incidents occur, not necessarily to block access to ordinary people.

    3. Re:Just have someone carry a baby in carrier by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 2, Informative

      There was a famous theft in which a large number of antique chairs were stolen from an office in broad daylight during working hours, with the staff present.

      The thieves drove up in a moving truck, wearing appropriate clothes, and explained that the chairs were being transferred to a different office. They presented "requisitions" to sign, got signatures, filled the truck, and dorve away.

    4. Re:Just have someone carry a baby in carrier by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      Where I work, you just need to be on a bicycle. I even got waved through the guard shack on a day that our governor was on site and security was being more strict. I know it's not because they know me, because I normally drive.

    5. Re:Just have someone carry a baby in carrier by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, of course they would. Everybody is thinking of the kids.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    6. Re:Just have someone carry a baby in carrier by wenit · · Score: 1

      Just dress nicely and say, "I here to fix the computer problem." There is always some computer trouble and people are happy to have you fix it.

    7. Re:Just have someone carry a baby in carrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the recent example of MIT students swiping Caltech's cannon. Campus security even questioned the individuals.

      Including extras posing as curious Caltech students shows how prepared these guys were. You know, if most of the 'students' hanging out in the area already questioned the workers and think they're legit, I guess they are legit - right?

    8. Re:Just have someone carry a baby in carrier by Eivind · · Score: 1
      Which is not, really, all that huge a problem.

      I hugely prefer living in a society where people have atleast some trust in eachother and do not go around in paranoia. Yes, the price of that is making certain kinds of crime somewhat easier. So what ? It's a price I'm more than willing to pay.

      Living in a society where everyone where terribly suspicious, all the time, would be horrible.

      OK, so there's limits. You shouldn't uninstall all locks or anything. But neither should you allow paranoia to run your life.

  13. Draw your own ID card by Brix+Braxton · · Score: 4, Funny

    I work in a secured building - it's a federally protected building right above a train hub and across from the sears tower. Anyway - security is similar to what was described - barely flashing anything that resembles a photo ID card with a splash of red on it is sufficient to get in. I keep fighting the urge to do it, but what I really want to do is just draw a half assed I.D. card with crayon and construction paper and see if it gets me through.

    --
    www.wildpad.com
    1. Re:Draw your own ID card by Zemran · · Score: 1

      I used to enter a military base by just flicking my wallet open, sometimes it would be a photo of my wife that I was flashing at them but I was driving a car that they knew and they were not looking that closely. I did mean to show my ID but I often made a mistake that I did not realise until later. I have several cards and photos in the windowed section of my wallet and sometimes got it wrong but I was never stopped for that. Sometimes they would do the routine mirrors under the car bit and look under the bonnet etc. but the two never happened together.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    2. Re:Draw your own ID card by ThePhin · · Score: 1

      barely flashing anything that resembles a photo ID card with a splash of red on it is sufficient to get in.

      Decades ago I worked at NASA Lewis Research Center. Access to the campus was along a long road with toll-gate controlled from a small guardhouse. The gate was always across the road, but the guards would raise it if someone flashed a badge, so the driver wouldn't have to come to a complete halt.

      This convenience was, at least temporarily, suspended after various engineers began playfully flashing anything vaguely shaped like the requisite security badge. I heard of people holding up cigarette packs, driver's licenses and the like. I guess what finally peeved the guards enough to complain was when somebody held up a pack of playing cards. ;^)~

    3. Re:Draw your own ID card by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Iused to enter a military base by just flicking my wallet open, sometimes it would be a photo of my wife that I was flashing at them but I was driving a car that they knew and they were not looking that closely. I did mean to show my ID but I often made a mistake that I did not realise until later. I have several cards and photos in the windowed section of my wallet and sometimes got it wrong but I was never stopped for that. Sometimes they would do the routine mirrors under the car bit and look under the bonnet etc. but the two never happened together.
      Back when I was on active duty in the army, we were working at an installation run by the air force that required picture badges to enter. The air force SP woulod take your badge, look at the picture, look at the badge, look back at the picture, then look back at you and hand you your badge before waving you in. Every single person enetering went through this. On more than one occasion, my roommate and I got our badges switched back in the barracks, and not once did the mutton-head checking badges catch it. This wouldn't be such a big deal if my roommate and I looked anything alike, but I'm a tall, clean shaven, skinny white boy and he was a big, barrel-shaped black man with a mustache. More often than not, those guys manning the gates are asleep on their feet.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    4. Re:Draw your own ID card by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      it's a federally protected building right above a train hub and across from the sears tower

      Good thing you didn't specify which Federally protected building right above a train hub and across from the Sears tower.

      "Hi internet! I live at 123 Sunset Dr., I have a 50" plasma TV, a few oz of gold ingot, and I'm gone from 8AM to 5:30PM. I have a security system and keep the doors locked, so you should know that the alarm code is 1573, and the spare key is under the gnome. No, no.. the other gnome."

      I'm all for public disclosure and transparent government, but this is hardly NSA evesdropping, and if what you said is true, then you've honestly made your building less secure by posting this information. Maybe you should consider a) telling someone other than 50,000 strangers on Slashdot, and b) thinking about what you post before you post it.

  14. Wow I thought everyone knew this... by Chineseyes · · Score: 3, Interesting

    During the summers as a college job I used to work at an insurance company mailroom which housed a lot of paperwork with very personal information SSN's Medical Info you name it, it was there. My fellow mailroom employees and I used to use CVS shopper cards to gain access to every room in the building when we had forgotten our ID cards at home. Also if you happen to have a shopper card for one grocery store it almost always works at a competing grocery store.

    --
    I think the invisible hand of the market has its middle finger extended

    --A wise old fart named SC0RN
    1. Re:Wow I thought everyone knew this... by winnabago · · Score: 3, Informative
      Also if you happen to have a shopper card for one grocery store it almost always works at a competing grocery store.
      That is most likely because your "competing" stores are different arms of the same conglomerate. Supervalu and Ahold are two of the largest, encompasing albertson's, stop n shop, giant, and several others. On top of this, the loyalty card databases may be maintained by an outside firm, who may combine the data across different chains into a superdatabase of every person who buys Watermelon, Vaseline, Jiffy-Pop, and Cool Whip on the same card. One thing that seems strange to me, though, is that I've never seen one that uses a magnetic strip. A quick look through the pile tells me it's much more common to see a more resilient bar code that is also printed on keychains and a letter that comes with the package. So, I can't try a mag strip out at the bank/office.


      It is interesting how some companies work very hard to force an image of different identities on their different divisons. For example, Gillette recently tried to distance themselves from a teen body spray that they were producing. It's good for the bottom line to create (perceived) competition, as we all know.

      --
      Dammit Otto, you have lupus.
    2. Re:Wow I thought everyone knew this... by Chineseyes · · Score: 0

      Well this was awhile back but the cvs shopping cards they had around here used to be printed on what looked like atm cards magnetic strip and all, I don't know if they do it anymore. A few other grocery store chains still do this including Wegmans you usually get a larger card with a magnetic strip on the back, then you get to smaller bar code keychain strips for easy storage.

      --
      I think the invisible hand of the market has its middle finger extended

      --A wise old fart named SC0RN
    3. Re:Wow I thought everyone knew this... by winnabago · · Score: 1
      Guess I never got one from them, but a pharmacy is the one place I could see some benefit for the customer, with cross-checking identity and whatnot. Also, if you buy something you don't want them to know about, don't use the card and pay cash.


      Completely off topic, too, Wegmans is one heck of a supermarket. It has that Trader Joes feel on a large scale. Also tremendous subs that they will make for ya. Too bad they haven't gotten to my state yet.

      --
      Dammit Otto, you have lupus.
    4. Re:Wow I thought everyone knew this... by madajb · · Score: 1
      One thing that seems strange to me, though, is that I've never seen one that uses a magnetic strip. A quick look through the pile tells me it's much more common to see a more resilient bar code that is also printed on keychains and a letter that comes with the package. So, I can't try a mag strip out at the bank/office.
      Mine (Albertsons, Safeway) have both. So you can "blip" it on the scanner or run it through the Debit/Credit card reader.

      -ajb
  15. Man..... by Mayhem178 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In college we had palm scanners just to get into the student recreation center. There was a rumor flying about that they could be beaten by scanning the back of your hand instead of the palm. Turned out to not be true.

    If you're telling me that my college gymnasium had better security than these places, then I am apalled.

    --

    "You will pay for your lack of vision..." - Emperor Palpatine to Ray Charles

    1. Re:Man..... by smooth+wombat · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      then I am apalled.


      No, this is appalling:

      Her: "For once I wish a guy would take a dump on my chest."
      Him: "That, is disgusting. I'm appalled. I can't believe no one has taken a dump on your chest."
      Her: Looking soulfully into his eyes, "Would you be that man?"
      Him: "It would be an honor and a privilege."

      Yeah, yeah, mod me down as offtopic. Can I help it if I think of that scene when someone says they're appalled?

      Besides, you know, it's funny. You would never suspect that everyone at this school is a professional dancer.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    2. Re:Man..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You went to Rose? Or is this more common than I thought...

    3. Re:Man..... by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

      What movie is that from? I recall seeing that scene in some bad teen sex comedy when I was in high school, I just don't remember which one.

    4. Re:Man..... by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      Not Another Teen Movie

      It's one of my top movies to watch no matter how many times Comedy Central runs it. That last line is my favorite.

      The other scene I like is when Jake goes to get his girl and he asks his friend where she and her date went.

      "All I know is he got a room at the Sunrise Motel."
      "Room number 6."
      "It's the one right after the ice machine. If you hit the Pepsi machine, you've gone too far."
      "Oh, and the door will definitely not be locked."
      "That's all I know."

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    5. Re:Man..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you can officially call yourself the biggest fan of that movie. Personally, I thought it was an average effort with a few laughs. You are the first person I've seen actively quoting that film. Congrats, you're the president of the fan club.

    6. Re:Man..... by nincehelser · · Score: 1

      >In college we had palm scanners just to get into the student >recreation center. There was a rumor flying about that they >could be beaten by scanning the back of your hand instead of >the palm. Turned out to not be true. It could have been true. Years ago I used to admin a few hand geometry readers (they really didn't scan your palm). If you loosened up the parameters enough, it would accept most anything...even the back of my left hand. Often the only "real" security on those systems was the PIN code. The use of the hand was just for show.

    7. Re:Man..... by Mayhem178 · · Score: 1

      Aye, Rose grad, Class of 2005.

      --

      "You will pay for your lack of vision..." - Emperor Palpatine to Ray Charles

    8. Re:Man..... by Nodatadj · · Score: 1

      I love it...just because it successfully took the piss out of so many bad movies.

      "Roadtrip!!!!!....We're here"

      The best bits are found by listening to the comments in the background of scenes, and freeze framing it to read all the posters.

    9. Re:Man..... by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      Actually I'm not that surprised. Schools are full of people that the administration doesn't trust as far as they can throw them. Give a student an loophole and they will find it.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
  16. That's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Lessons: after writing down your password, eat your sticky notes rather than leave them on the monitor."

    I only buy 3M *flavoured* Post-It (TM) products.

    Securi-licious!

    1. Re:That's why... by Jon+Luckey · · Score: 3, Funny
      I only buy 3M *flavoured* Post-It (TM) products.

      Do they taste 50% better than M&M's?

      --
      -- 3 events that reshaped the world in the 20th century: WW1, WW2, and WWW
    2. Re:That's why... by davecrusoe · · Score: 1

      Absolutely, and for the nutrition-conscious, they also contain 25% fewer calories and no poly-saturated fats. Best of all, they come in packs of 50, 200, and 10,000 ( at a deep discount!)

  17. skip the adverts/spamsite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Social Engineering, the Shoppers' Way

    JULY 19, 2006 | 9:32 AM -- For years, the "card key" has been considered a reliable means of securing the enterprise from unauthorized visitors. In some cases, these cards also serve as identification, and when combined with smartcard technology, a form of network authentication. But if these cards are misconfigured or managed, they can be rendered useless -- as my penetration testing company recently proved.

    About six months ago, a medical facility hired us to assess its information security as part of a HIPAA compliance effort. During a pre-assessment briefing, the customer indicated a concern about physical access to the building, which could lead to a compromise of the network.

    The company asked us to attempt to circumvent the physical security system, gain access to the building, and retrieve as much information as we could. We agreed, pending the appropriate "get out of jail" arrangements in case we were caught and detained by the authorities.

    This facility was a little different than our other HIPAA customers, which are usually insurance companies or hospitals. The target this time was a giant laboratory that performs tests on samples sent by physicians from all over the region. With the volume of healthcare data stored in the facility, we knew that getting inside and connecting to the network could yield a good deal of sensitive and valuable information.

    Before we tried to get in, I scoped out the entry points, observed when people came and went, and looked for potential weaknesses in security. Although I couldn't spot any video surveillance, the building security seemed pretty solid; the primary entrance was guarded by a receptionist behind glass. Other doorway access points were secured by a magnetic card swipe system.

    On the day we planned to get into the building, I decided to try the magnetic swipe system. In a worst-case scenario, I figured I could fumble my way in, acting as if my card had malfunctioned and asking an employee to open the door from the inside.

    Without having an "official" magnetic access card to duplicate, I pulled every card with a magnetic stripe from my wallet, including my bank ATM card, a credit card, and a shopping card from a major grocery store. To my surprise, the first swipe from the shopping card opened the door.

    Once inside, we knew that blending into the environment was going to be a necessity. I needed to get my colleague to a conference room to jack into the network and start port scanning, while I started looking for logins and passwords by flipping keyboards and pulling yellow sticky notes from monitors. We located a men's room that also served as a changing facility for employees. Conveniently, it also contained clean smocks and scrubs for us to use.

    Now dressed in the appropriate attire, we started walking the facility. We located an empty conference room and commandeered it as our place to work. As my colleague jacked into the network and started scanning each address, I started moving through the facility looking for anything that could provide privileged network access.

    Within minutes, I located workstations littered with sticky notes containing logins and passwords. Some even provided detailed information on which systems could be accessed. After collecting several logins and passwords, I made my way back to our conference room to use what I had found.

    As soon as I walked into the room, my colleague indicated he was now a domain administrator with access to numerous systems as well. Our efforts led us to a significant find of HIPAA-rich information. After several hours, we had collected enough information for our report, and we casually exited the building through the same doorway we entered.

    Back at our office, we immediately notified the customer of the security flaw in the magnetic card swipe system. We later learned that the door access system had been mistakenly set to use a feature called "man-trap," which enables banks to secure their ATM ma

    1. Re:skip the adverts/spamsite by llamalicious · · Score: 1

      You mean, skip the actual site the story is hosted on and published by? Oh, in that case...

  18. security by hostylocal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    physical security on most sites is a joke. at my last job i used to work for the u.k government and we had a running competition to see who could get past the security guard station with the most rediculous item. i think that the winner used a tin of sardines that looked nothing like the site pass, but was approximately the same shape. i used to use a cigarette packet most of the time. the mag swipes to enter various blocks did actually look for your pass number on a list of approved numbers however - but a large portion of these were left unlocked or propped open during warm periods. lh

    1. Re:security by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      Heh, our place here our security morons don't look too closely either. Our cards are white with a picture on the front an a black mag stripe on the back. I carry mine in a little plastic holder on a retractible cord from my belt. Half the time it hangs with the stripe-side, which is apparently good enough for most of the guards. There is one guy who will ask you to stop and show the photo side, but I think this is more because he likes the power trip than a desire to actually make sure you have a valid id.

      Once I left my card at home and just pulled out my grocery store card and waved the back of it at the guards until I could get upstairs and have someone let me in. On the way back from lunch, mr superhero security guard asked me to turn it over, whereupon I flipped it, planning to make some excuse along the lines of 'oops, wrong one, where is my card -- um, must have left it at home'. Didn't need to, he apparently never even looked to see the Jewel or Dominicks logo where my company name and my photo should have been. My coworker and I just about suffocated from trying not to laugh out loud as we made of the elevators.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  19. Just a thought by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

    It occurs to me that all this attention to security detail will come to naught in the Star Trek future - they could just use the transporter and beam into any secure area, all they need are the coordinates and blammo, they're in.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:Just a thought by paladinwannabe2 · · Score: 1

      Ah, but they could shield secure areas, making transporter beam-ins impossible.

      Sadly, this post might get modded insightful...

      --
      You are reading a copy of my copyrighted post.
    2. Re:Just a thought by everett · · Score: 1

      I wonder if something akin to a Faraday cage could block the transporter beam.

      --
      Sig withheld to protect the innocent.
    3. Re:Just a thought by 49152 · · Score: 1

      Bah! By now, everyone knows you can "punch through" the EM windows that are created by normal shield frequency rotation! ;-)

    4. Re:Just a thought by Valdrax · · Score: 1
      *Pushes taped, nerd glasses up*

      Actually, anyone who watched Star Trek knows that:
      1. Transporters cannot get through defensive shields. This is why shields have to be knocked out before enemies can board in combat. Think of all the times the Borg attack and invade.
      2. Internal shield technology is common for security (at least in the open hallways and around brig cells). Shielding an installation against transporter jumping spies would be easily doable.
      It would be pretty trivial to stop teleportation incursions.
      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    5. Re:Just a thought by crawling_chaos · · Score: 1
      It's simpler than that as anyone knows:

      merely require all suspicious persons to wear red shirts. No one in their right mind will ever get near a transporter wearing one of those unless they are of Scots descent. At which point they will disassemble the darn thing and put it back together in better working order than it started out.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    6. Re:Just a thought by ardin,mcallister · · Score: 0

      Ok, you're all giving slashdot readers a bad name, you trekkies.
      Its fine to think that kind of crap, but saying it is why you don't get laid guys. ... Women however, can say that kind of crap, and make the nerds drool over them...

      What a world

      --
      "Some men just want to watch the world burn..."
    7. Re:Just a thought by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      You mean, as opposed to talking about whether or not other people are too lame to get laid on an online forum for geeks?

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  20. At least it checked for a magnetic strip... by ACorrosionOfDeviants · · Score: 1

    Some of the ATM doors in my city are even less secure than that, checking only that *something* has been inserted into the card slot. No magnetic strip required -- a piece of paper or thin cardboard will do.

  21. Easy full access by nizo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wonder how many companies screen the janitorial staff? Not only do they typically have full access to the building, but they are there after hours and can easily rummage around looking for usernames, passwords, and machines that are still logged in with administrator privledges. Heck they could bring a laptop in and connect directly to the internal network for that matter.

    1. Re:Easy full access by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      Every office I've ever worked in which had card-level access also gave cards to the janitorial staff, and their usage of the cards was logged and tracked just like everyone else.

    2. Re:Easy full access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what? You missed the point entirely. Janitors are going to be going into pretty much every square inch of the building (even your server room is going to have to be sweeped occasionaly) to do their job.

      A rouge janitor can easily come in and take printed copies of internal technical specifications, scribbled passwords written on post-its, jack into the network, and etc.

      I really chuckled at your post because its so naive to miss such obvious possibilities.

    3. Re:Easy full access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      So what? You missed the point entirely. Janitors are going to be going into pretty much every square inch of the building (even your server room is going to have to be sweeped occasionaly) to do their job.


      Where I work (I'm in an IT dept) we actually have to clean our own stuff unless we're there babysitting the janitors. The janitorial staff comes though once a week while we're there (yeah, a pain in the ass) but other than that we're "it". Only people directly in the IT food chain have physical access to the IT section of the facility (basically it's IT peons -> Director of IT -> VP of Operations -> Pres).

      When I worked for the federal government I was located in a SCIF on a military base, and we had our own janitors, MPs, bean counters, etc. and they were all cleared for TS material. We even had a technical librarian and a small library in there!

      I do understand that not every company can take such precautions, but your point is noted. Own the place physically with the most innocuous folks and you still own the place. Period.
    4. Re:Easy full access by tweek · · Score: 1

      That doesn't address what they do when they get inside. In fact most janitorial staff have more access then some employees. I can't get into a boss' office but the jan. staff have a key to empty his trash can because he can't be assed to leave it outside the door.

      The secondary fact that they could bring in a laptop and plug in anywhere demonstrates a TOTAL lack of insight into security. Most people assume that if you're inside you belong. Not just physically but by having live ethernet jacks everywhere that don't have MAC restrictions or that aren't in a dead VLAN.

      True someone could snag the MAC address that is always on the sticker on the back of an existing computer and spoof it but that's a whole different issue in itself.

      --
      "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
    5. Re:Easy full access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did a demo of this, oh, 20 years ago to prove a point. I put on a set of "workmans blues" - aka a work uniform, with a company name (actual name of the company I worked for - but NOT the company in question) and MY real name on it, grabbed a tool bag, walked in, told the guard I had to go to "the machinary room" to work on the HVAC - and walked in - I had enough tools in there to physically break just about anything

      Came out, told the head of security what happened...

      Remember - at that point, with a bit of skill (I've seen it done), you can swap out a lock cylinder or 2, and get the master key for the building....

    6. Re:Easy full access by bhpratt · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've worked a national laboratory and even the janitorial staff had to have secret or top-secret clearance to be allowed access to the respective secure areas. In fact, now that I think about it, most of the janitorial staff had higher clearance than I did...

    7. Re:Easy full access by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      I'm not missing the obvious, I was stating that it's just as easy to track down a janitor who signs in to machine X at Y o'clock as it is to track any other rogue employee. It's not any easier for janitors. So they can unlock more doors, big deal. It's still obvious who unlocked that door and when.

    8. Re:Easy full access by jonwil · · Score: 1

      I used to work for a software engineering firm and they had the following processes in place to prevent theft of confidential information by janitors and anyone else not authorised to have the info:
      Any physical confidential items (printouts, prototypes, manuals, stuff written down etc) are secured in a locked cabinet of some kind (employees were all given their own storage space to which they have keys but janitors, co-workers etc dont) unless its actually being used.
      Any paper materials being disposed of go into a locked trash can for secure destruction.
      Computers are secured by passwords and by screen locking software so janitors (or anyone else) cant come in and use it to steal information.

    9. Re:Easy full access by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      Same with where I work. The janitors don't have top-secret, but they do have considerably more background checks than the employees. We only have one janitor, only that one janitor is allowed in (cameras on all doors) and all employee office doors lock and are supposed to be locked. If you don't put your trash out it doesn't get emptied. Likewise, the labs and other interesting areas are not accessible to the janitor's prox badge. We've declined to continue employing a janitor when the janitor's credit rating changed suddenly for the worse (which really sucks for the person in question.) And the kicker is: we're not even working on any particularly vitally secret stuff, just intensely competitive, high-profit-margin electronics.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    10. Re:Easy full access by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      My mother was a secretary for some DOD stuff (EGG, I think), and she had higher clearance than her boss - he was cleared for parts of the docs she was working on, but she had to type the whole thing...

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    11. Re:Easy full access by Spunk · · Score: 1

      Here, we get around that by having someone with the proper clearance follow the janitors around as they work.

  22. The Man Trap by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Funny

    they could just use the transporter and beam into any secure area, all they need are the coordinates and blammo, they're in.

    But, you forgot, after you beam down there could be an extremely attractive woman just waiting to suck all the salt out of you!

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:The Man Trap by doubleofive · · Score: 1

      I was waiting for the obvious "Man Trap" episode joke. In fact, thats what I first thought when I read the article!

      --
      Your tongues can't repel flavor of that magnitude!
  23. Extraordinary transformation by Demerara · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What's most amazing about the story is not that they got "made" second time round but that the woman who did so had left the building, started her car and began to drive away. She remembered what had happened, turned round and came back to shop the two pentesters.

    That this happened in this fashion 6 months after the initial (and hugely embarassing) successful penetration reflects both the company's response and the quality of the security awareness training delivered to employees.

    How many people, hand on heart, once they're out of the office, would turn round and come back for such a scenario?

    --
    Backward%20compatibility%20is%20over-rated
    1. Re:Extraordinary transformation by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      She remembered what had happened, turned round and came back to shop the two pentesters.

      Doesn't surprise me at all. You can get some pretty good deals with those club cards...

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    2. Re:Extraordinary transformation by quacking+duck · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Been there, done that.

      A few years ago I worked at a company that issues SSL certificates. I'd already driven from home to the office for some scheduled after-hours work, and issued a cert as part of that work. I was almost back home again when I realized I'd left my ID token card in the cert-issuing computer.

      Now, this machine was in a locked room which required ID card and PIN access, and even with the token card you had to fingerprint and password the computer. Nonetheless, I drove all the way across town again to put the token back in the safe.

      Chances are I could've been the first person into the room the next day and no one would've been the wiser, but better safe than sorry--especially when it's policy.

    3. Re:Extraordinary transformation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...the initial (and hugely embarassing) successful penetration..."

      I found this line to be strangely erotic.

  24. Bad Advice? by BrianRoach · · Score: 3, Interesting

    FTA: We advised them to look for a badge and question individuals who appear to be out of place.

    Umm ... how about, "Call security and tell them" instead?

    If you've got someone who's in the middle of a criminal act ... is it wise to test just how much of a criminal they are?

    While it may be that most data poachers serious enough to break into a building aren't violent criminals ... I'm not going to test that theory. Especially if it's late at night, I'm unarmed, and I'm outnumbered 2:1.

    Spending the rest of the night duct-taped in a supply closet just doesn't seem like all that much fun to me :)

    - Roach

    1. Re:Bad Advice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Spending the rest of the night duct-taped in a supply closet just doesn't seem like all that much fun to me :)

      Some people pay good money for that kind of treatment. I mean, I've heard. Just sayin' is all.
    2. Re:Bad Advice? by pe1rxq · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, you could have a security hit squad jump them.....
      But most of the time someone looking out of place has a good reason to be there, maybe a new guy or someone from another department or just some guy with a bad sense of direction. In those cases just talking to them will be enough.
      Also most of the times this will be during regular office times when you outnumber them 10:1.

      Late at night you are right ofcourse, just call security.

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    3. Re:Bad Advice? by BrianRoach · · Score: 1

      Oh, I agree ... during the day when there's lots of people around and such, I'd have no problem approaching someone with a simple "Hey, are you looking for something/someone" type thing.

      2 guys at 10pm when the building was pretty much cleared out? Oh, and I just happen to notice they slipped the door when someone was leaving (as in TFA)? Nope. Sorry, not my job. I'm going to smile and nod as I walk by then go pick up a phone :D

      - Roach

    4. Re:Bad Advice? by alienw · · Score: 1

      Well, generally, in an office building, you don't just randomly call security on random people. It may have just been another co-worker, for instance. Hell, maybe it was an upper manager who was in a hurry and didn't want to get out his ID card. Even if it's a data poacher, it's not like they are going to stab you in the middle of a corporate lobby in the middle of the day.

    5. Re:Bad Advice? by BrianRoach · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I was responding in the context of the article. Silly me, I know.

      It's late at night, and you see two guys slip a door when someone else exits.

      They're ...

      A) Co-Workers you don't know who both happened to forget their badges and need to be in the building after-hours.
      B) 2 Upper Managers your don't know who both happened to forget their badges and need to be in the building after-hours.
      C) Two guys who shouldn't be there.

      Final Answer? ;)

      - Roach

    6. Re:Bad Advice? by Overzeetop · · Score: 4, Insightful

      maybe it was an upper manager who was in a hurry and didn't want to get out his ID card

      Yes, it's not the situation in the article, but you bring up a very valid point:

      Security Is For Everyone

      You absolutely should call security on upper management, though you might want to do it from someone else's phone. Management, not matter what level, must respect the security measures, no matter how high they are. The CEO should have his ID card at the ready if he's in a secure facility. *hrupph*

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    7. Re:Bad Advice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where did you get the idea that any of this took place at night?

    8. Re:Bad Advice? by tekiegreg · · Score: 1

      I don't care if it's A or B. As a security guard I'm doing my job, and I'm sure A or B would understand why I thought that way if the police jumped them. It's that simple....

      --
      ...in bed
    9. Re:Bad Advice? by srpatterson · · Score: 1

      If its an upper manager, you punch them in the face, break their kneecaps *then* call security.

      --
      -- The Heineken Uncertainty Principle: You can never be sure how many bears you had last night.
    10. Re:Bad Advice? by element-o.p. · · Score: 2, Informative

      You are exactly right, but unfortunately, that's the way a lot of places operate.

      I used to work in a telco wire center, where the department I worked in was staffed 24x7. With two people per shift and coverage seven days a week, that means that four days a week, there was only one person in the building at any given time. The wire center was secured with card readers and magnetic locks on the doors, but one of the sensors kept malfunctioning--it would send an "open" alarm to the company contracted to provide security.

      So, what was the security company's response? Would they send their on-site patrol guy, complete with radio, pepper spray, kevlar vest and semi-auto pistol? No, of course not! They called us to check the back door to see if it was a false alarm or if someone was actually trying to break in. Needless to say, that went over <sarcasm>REAL well </sarcasm>.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    11. Re:Bad Advice? by Valdrax · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Security Is For Everyone

      Actually, that very egalitarian notion is likely to result in the dismantling of security procedures, depending on the workplace. I have a friend who worked for an AOL call center that had a man-trap up until the day that a senior VP got stuck in it due to a glitch that revoked his ID, causing him to be locked in and secured when he lacked credentials for entry.

      Getting laughed at by underlings will cause nearly any office procedure to get revoked if the executive is high enough.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    12. Re:Bad Advice? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      If it was dismantled, then security wasn't really necessary at that level, was it? Often, security measures can be overdone by people who are too conservative. If a VP decides that his vanity is more important than what could be lost by the company if security is removed, that is his or her call. They are well compensated because they are given the authority and responsibilty to make those decisions. He may have just identified an area where the company could save resources (through less security). Or, maybe not. Only time will tell if the security was needed, but either way the decision will have his fingerprints on it. (That's not to imply that those fingerprints will be recognized and correlated in the event of a failure; not all top management is competent)

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    13. Re:Bad Advice? by revlayle · · Score: 1

      "Spending the rest of the night duct-taped in a supply closet just doesn't seem like all that much fun to me :)"

      HA! Says you!

    14. Re:Bad Advice? by zstlaw · · Score: 1

      I personally agree with your assessment. I once saw a man whom I didn't recognize wandering around my office asking questions of employees. He was nicely dressed and acted like he belonged. Still I confronted him and it turns out he was my company's lead investor. To this day he respects me as the only person whom wasn't willing to disclose information until his identity was proven. And yes I did not let him out of my sight until his identity was proven.

      It could have gone the other way too, but most investors want to see their investment is protected. Senior management, on the other hand, may be bullies with little to no respect of security. But even they are polite if they know you speak with their superior. *heh* Funny how they bully people who can't smack them down in return.

    15. Re:Bad Advice? by merreborn · · Score: 1

      When I worked at *pizza hut* of all places, the instructions were blatantly clear: Never let ANYONE behind the counter until they'd produced ID. All franchise management carried franchise ID cards.

      This was fucking pizza hut. You'd hope places that actually mattered, like, you know, medical facilities would have security that was at least comperable.

    16. Re:Bad Advice? by ehud42 · · Score: 1

      Hear! Hear!
      My dad worked in a manufacturing plant (farm equipment). A new fork lift driver just about backed into the company president who inappropriately wandered too close. The driver FLIPPED (figuratively). Went up one side and down the other. Told this stranger in a suit that he was DAMN lucky not to be hurt and maybe next time he should either stick closer to the tour guide or stay out of the building (or something to that effect). The president... appologized and left the area.

      When the driver was informed who he had taken to task - he immediately feared for his job and went to appologize for being rude. The president would have none of it. He was clearly in the wrong place and he should have known better. He thanked the operator for being vigilant and sent him back to work.

      Now that's someone worth working for!

      (BTW, anti-union rant here - this is one of the few blue collar large scale manufacturing plants around that is NOT unionized. Upper management appreciates their staff and understands their jobs.)

      --
      I'm in my right mind and I have the answer to everything!
    17. Re:Bad Advice? by dbc · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Getting laughed at by underlings will cause nearly any office procedure to get revoked if the executive is high enough.

      No, that is a sign of a company culture with far worse problems. If that is so where you work, put out your resume.

      I worked at Intel for over a decade. "Employee only" technical and marketing data is published in serial numbered documents with a distinctive cover color. Every few months, the night shift guards walk the building confiscating secret documents that have not been locked away for the night. Document control matches up the serial numbers to names, a list gets generated, and the manager of those caught out gets an e-mail.

      So, one day the V.P. of our division had a document picked up, and his name was put on a list that was sent to Andy Grove. We all got a good laugh out of that, including the V.P., who took the ribbing quite good naturedly. It's possible to take your work seriously without taking yourself overly seriously.

    18. Re:Bad Advice? by swb · · Score: 1

      Get yourself a carry permit and a J-frame S&W or other pocket-carry firearm and you won't have that unarmed feeling anymore.

    19. Re:Bad Advice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (BTW, anti-union rant here - this is one of the few blue collar large scale manufacturing plants around that is NOT unionized. Upper management appreciates their staff and understands their jobs.)

      Pro-union rant here -- unfortunately, not every company is so enlightened, so the unions are a necessary defense.

  25. I swiped too by grumpyman · · Score: 1
    Without having an "official" magnetic access card to duplicate, I pulled every card with a magnetic stripe from my wallet, including my bank ATM card, a credit card, and a shopping card from a major grocery store. To my surprise, the first swipe from the shopping card opened the door.


    I'm not surprised as I've also tried this maybe 10 years ago into the bank ATM machine access - with a frequent flyer card. I was thinking, how in the world would the thing verify as other banks customers can use the machine as well. Without the keypunch it probably didn't do anything other than verify it's a magnetic stripe.

    1. Re:I swiped too by generic-man · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty low-risk thing to get into an ATM area. Once you've passed through the man trap you're in a tiny camera-filled room with nothing more than a few ATMs. They only put that man trap in there to prevent bums from setting up camp in the ATM room.

      --
      For more information, click here.
  26. Reverse Scenario by ruben.gutierrez · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wonder if we can get mega-discounts at the grocery store if we use our card key in place of our club card?

    1. Re:Reverse Scenario by 4solarisinfo · · Score: 1

      Just do what I do - make up phone numbers as your 'alternate'. Best is when they read the reciept as they hand it to me (a tall white guy) and say "Thanks for shopping xxxxx Ms. Chin...."

  27. Other items that work well. by Demon-Xanth · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Pretty much any type of tools. ESPECIALLY telephone buttsets. My dad worked for a phone company for a long time, and if he had a telephone buttset, nobody every questioned his credentials, or took a second thought about letting him into anywhere in a building. Locked door? Just ask someone to open it for you!

    Clipboard. If you got a clip board, people are AFRAID to question you. A coworker of mine visited a major plant once, and the employees mistook him for a CEO or something like that because he had a clipboard.

    Suit and tie. People will assume you're a rep of a visiting company and will give you directions.

    The best locks in the world won't do any good if someone trusted opens it for an attacker.

    --
    If you think education is expensive, you should try ignorance -- Derek Bok, president of Harvard
    1. Re:Other items that work well. by tradiuz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well abused tool belt with used tools (the one day my tools and tool belt were new and shiny, I had security ask for credentials 4 times, and have never been asked since).
      Well abused hard hat with a contractors name on it (Simplex/Grinell works well, since 99.9% of everyone have a Simplex/Notifier fire alarm system in Houston).
      Work worn blue jeans and t-shirt. Cover-alls also work.
      Worn work boots.

      What really scares me though, is that I had less resistance walking around Halliburton than I had walking around BMC Computers. Apparently, software code is behind better locks than radioactive material. I used to be a fire alarm tech, and went into the wrong building once, had security open the fire command center, and opened the panel before I realised that I was a block away from my intended destination. I put the panel back on, walked out, thanked security, and made haste to my original destination. This was very soon after 9/11, and security was stopping everyone with a suit and tie, but toolbelts got to walk past the metal detectors.

    2. Re:Other items that work well. by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's scary, but unfortunately true.

      Where I work (a medium-sized audio/video equipment and "lifestyle" company) everyone is required to wear their access card in a visible place, and guests are issued specielt guest cards that they have to sign for. Everyone here is strongly reminded that it is their duty to question anyone who does not have a visible access card or guest card as well as anyone who looks out of place.

      Also, when visiting any of the research departments and assembly lines, mobile phones and anything else possibly containing a camera are to be stored at the receptionist's desk for the duration of the visit.

      In the end, it is very much up to the employees, however. It's a good thing people generally like working here, so they do put in the slight extra effort to maintain some level of security :-)

      --
      Eat the rich.
    3. Re:Other items that work well. by DarkDragonVKQ · · Score: 1

      heh the Great Wall of China didn't stop whatever dynasty from being attacked either.. According to cultural history some idiot thought they were friendly troops and opened the gate to them. -_-

      --
      "I thought what I'd do was I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes" ~ Laughing Man - GITS:SAC
    4. Re:Other items that work well. by srw · · Score: 1

      Only slighty related, but...

      My dad has, on occasion, declined free gasoline. You see, he has a Schlumberger cap, (my brother-in-law works in the oil industry) and when filling up in the heart of oil country, the gas station attendants have sometimes assumed it will be on the company's account.

      I have never got free coffee in my Haliburton travel mug, though.

    5. Re:Other items that work well. by hal9000(jr) · · Score: 1

      Clipboard. If you got a clip board, people are AFRAID to question you. A coworker of mine visited a major plant once, and the employees mistook him for a CEO or something like that because he had a clipboard.

      Hey, don't let the cat out of the bag. When I was in the Navy, if I wanted to slack, I would carry a clipboard. No one bothers you if you have a clipboard. :)

    6. Re:Other items that work well. by Shotgun · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My dad was a painter. Same story. The benefit of using the painter ruse is that you can tape off the conference room, cover everything with tarps, spread some paint around to get it good and smelly, and people will AVOID it. You won't even have to try to be sneaky while scanning the network.

      I think most of the security in corporate buildings is more about insurance liability than security. When I was a security guard while going to college*, we were told not to approach anyone we saw on the premises at night. If they looked suspicious we were to call the police. The company recieved something like a 30% discount for having a minimum wage person walk through the building every few hours. Our job was to to discourage vandalism by our presence, and to observe and report (so that the fire only guts half of the north wing instead of the whole thing).

      The card readers are much the same. We just want to keep the random passerby from wandering through on sightseeing expeditions, and have something to cover our butts with at the civil trial when the judge asks why we were letting murderers and rapist wander the halls. Mention of coporate espionage will raise a few snickers amoung the security managers.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    7. Re:Other items that work well. by cexshun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I use this ruse also. Although my identification of choice is a handheld ham radio. If you have a walky-talky style radio, people will let you anywhere.

      A little trick I learned when geocaching. People are always suspicious if they see people snooping around. I found that a relective vest(like that worn by motorcyclists), a clipboard and ham radio would get me into ANYWHERE! Do Not Enter? HA! Authorized Personel Only? JOKE!

    8. Re:Other items that work well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We occasionaly had unauthorized visitors in our old office (crappy security).
      We had a lady with a clipboard roaming around our office, she remembered some names from name plates on the doors as she walked around so she could claim she was looking for someones office that actually worked there if questioned. One person questioned her and she claimed she worked in the IT department doing equipment inventory. Problem was the person that questioned her was the IT manager of a 12 person department (being only 12 of us means we obviously know more about each other then we care or need too). When she was told to hold on she bolted and a few people gave chase but did not catch her. At least 3 people in the office had money/valubles missing.

      The clipboard or just looking like you know what you are doing does work.

      We have since moved and have rfid badges. We are spread out over 4 floors. All elevators and entrances to each floor require a badge and the front entrance at ground level even pops up with your picture on the computer screen that the security people are monitoring. I don't know if they actually look at it though.

      On a side note, all of our "public area" network jacks which are in the secured areas (conference rooms, phone rooms, waiting areas etc) are all using 802.1x authentication and will only provide off network internet connectivity without the keys. Not perfect but it is a start

    9. Re:Other items that work well. by Demon-Xanth · · Score: 1

      Bring along a partner, a transit, and a large pole and you could act as surveyors and loiter anywhere all day. That includes the middle of a street.

      --
      If you think education is expensive, you should try ignorance -- Derek Bok, president of Harvard
    10. Re:Other items that work well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhmm, the great wall of China was built well inside the borders of China in an unpopulated area, and has never been manned. It was a failed project before it began.

    11. Re:Other items that work well. by sharky611aol.com · · Score: 1
      My favorite "get into places where you shouldn't" tool? A stethescope. I'm a med student, and I'm fairly sure I could stroll into Fort Knox if I had a stethescope around my neck. Add in a white coat and it's all over but the crying.

      Case in point: In the immediate aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, I was working at the Assembly Center on LSU's campus, where they were triaging patients coming out of New Orleans. There was some serious security here, including National Guard troops with AK-47s at most of the secured entrances. They were checking IDs on everybody that came in, but I was never once questioned. Just act like you belong, look like you're in a hurry, and stroll right on in.

    12. Re:Other items that work well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aargh!

      The quote in your sig is not from " Laughing Man - GITS:SAC". It's from Holden Caulfield in "The Catcher in the Rye", by JD Salinger. GitS just quoted the book (along with many others).

      Posting anonymously because it's widely offtopic, but it just annoyed me.

    13. Re:Other items that work well. by identity0 · · Score: 1

      The other factor is race and gender, which most here probobly wouldn't have thought of because they're white males.

      A Asian friend of mine once went to consult for an American branch of a Japanese company, and when he got there, everyone assumed he was from the head office in Tokyo and treated him with extra deference and respect, even though he was 1) Not even an employee, just a contractor, 2) Born in Mississippi, and 3) Spoke with perfect American English.

      The funny thing is, when he met the Japanese execs they were kind of racist/standoffish, him being an Chinese-American and all... but around the white/black/latino employees, he was treated very well because they didn't want to risk pissing off someone from the home office, and assumed any Asian was :)

      I'm guessing you could pull off something similar with American/European companies in non-white countries if you're white. Be sure to either dress in a nice suit or carry a clipboard, though :)

  28. Hard Core Intrusions by BoRegardless · · Score: 1

    So just how secure do you think most corporations are to intrusions by intensively competitive foreign firms, like, shall we say those from Korea (Both), China, Taiwan and others, who have already figured out what college students (including the foreign students) had figured out 10 years before during their undergraduate work?

  29. Did the word "thought" escape your keyboard? by abb3w · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It occurs to me that all this attention to security detail will come to naught in the Star Trek future - they could just use the transporter and beam into any secure area, all they need are the coordinates and blammo, they're in.

    I refer you over to Larry Niven's essay, "The Theory and Practice of Teleportation", collected in All The Myriad Ways; you'll probably need to check used bookstores or libraries for it. However, as my memory serves, he characterized that type of teleportation (both recieve-to-device-from-anywhere and send-from-device-to-anywhere) as "you don't get a society, you get a short war".

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
    1. Re:Did the word "thought" escape your keyboard? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      "you don't get a society, you get a short war".

      And it could even be used as a weapon of war. Teleport someone's heart (and just their heart) 10 feet away from them, and see how long they live...

      -b.

    2. Re:Did the word "thought" escape your keyboard? by abb3w · · Score: 1

      And it could even be used as a weapon of war.

      That was one of the points raised in the essay, yes. Thus, Niven's essay focuses on the only recipe he could see that gave a society: both transmitter and reciever stations required.

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
    3. Re:Did the word "thought" escape your keyboard? by Firefly1 · · Score: 1
      I refer you over to Larry Niven's essay, "The Theory and Practice of Teleportation"...
      Quite true: while expensive to set up and power, chronospheres can do nasty things to enemy units (drop tanks in water, etc.). Then you have the chrono tanks (Red Alert) and chrono legionnaires (Red Alert 2/Yuri's Revenge) - for best use, drive them in so they can jump out if they get in trouble.
      --
      - White Knight of the Order of Mihoshi Enthusiasts
    4. Re:Did the word "thought" escape your keyboard? by Atario · · Score: 1
      he characterized that type of teleportation (both recieve-to-device-from-anywhere and send-from-device-to-anywhere) as "you don't get a society, you get a short war".
      Quite so. Which is why I hope they invent this, but only in the form of send-from-device-to-device-only -- teleporter booths on every corner.

      Unless, of course, I'm the only one with the -to-anywhere and/or -from-anywhere model. Heh heh hehhh.
      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  30. Wrong definition of man trap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The correct usage of man trap is
     
    "The Man Trap was the first-aired regular season episode of Star Trek. In this episode, a landing party from the Enterprise beams down to perform an annual checkup..."

  31. Don't give British education a bad name, sonny. by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    Privileges
    Vulnerabilities

    Stick to low syllable count words if you can't hack it with the big boys !

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    1. Re:Don't give British education a bad name, sonny. by mainframemouse · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's the side effect of living in the spell check generation. Besides, English is my second language. Gibberish is my first.

    2. Re:Don't give British education a bad name, sonny. by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      Come to think of it, I think Gibbrish is everyone's first.

  32. Password Safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Lessons: after writing down your password, eat your sticky notes rather than leave them on the monitor.

    I disagree. Use a randomly generated password. Don't write down the password, and don't eat the sticky note (for health reasons etc bla bla). Use similarly random information for all of the "backdoor" passwords. Did you know that my mother's maiden name is, on occasion, Kwier5*Y? Then, copy all of that information into Password Safe (or any of its Mac or Linux clones).

    Oh, and make backup copies of your database, to prevent the embarassment of having to spell out your mother's maiden name to some call center bum in Bangalore.

    1. Re:Password Safe by Overzeetop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why bother with all that memorization. Heck, I can never remember stuff I don't use on a regular basis and it takes me a good 10-12 logins to really burn in a password. That's why I ditched truly random in favor of a long password string, from which I chose my passwords. See, I just wrote a short routine to generate 250 characters, alphanumeric only, including upper and lowercase. I pick a starting point and use (say) a 9 character password. When it's time for a new password, I choose a new spot in the string to start from. If I'm feeling odd, I'll go backwards in the string. But how do I remember all 250 characters? I don't. I print it out on a card and put it in my wallet, unlabelled, along with all the phone numbers I might need in an emergency. Heck, I might even leave a copy on my desk if I'm burning a new password into my skull. Easy for me to remember where I started, a good bit harder for anyone else. And, since most systems that matter have a lockout function, it would take someone quite a good bit of time to try all combinations at random (there are still about 2000 resonable combinations of length, starting character, and direction). We're not talking about nuclear start codes, here.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  33. Ridiculous by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    You're giving the Brits a bad name.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    1. Re:Ridiculous by mainframemouse · · Score: 1

      2 slashdotters are doing damage to the good name of Britain. What about all those MI5 operatives that leave their laptops in clubs and Taxis, the police and health services that dump hard drives full of sencitive data and the general incompantance of the government.

    2. Re:Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brits give Brits a bad name.

    3. Re:Ridiculous by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      Sensitive & Incompetent

      How amusing.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    4. Re:Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, someone has to come up with a counter argument to show good security.

      I used to work for the Department of Work and Pensions (roughly equivalent to DSS in the US) on the telephones. I had access to the NI database (rather amusingly named Legacy, considering how old it was) to do my job.

      Access to the building was via a punch-code lock, but there was a guard you had to walk past. This was a small office, and he knew everyone by name.

      Access to the computers required a smart card (chip, not swipe) and password. Keeping the card physically attached to you was strongly recommended, but not mandated. However, leaving the computer with your card inserted was a firable offence. There was a separate per user password to access Legacy, and all accesses and modifications were logged. Some records in the database are considered more priveleged and are locked. Trying to access one of these would flag up on the IT security guy's computer, and I needed to fill in a form and provide documentary evidence that I needed access to the record. Not doing this immediately would get a visit from him within an hour asking for an explanation (found this out the hard way when thinking I'd do one more record before lunch, hitting one, then deciding to leave the forms till after lunch).

      Attempting to access your own record immediately locked you out of the system (first thing one of my colleagues tried!). Once or twice a week, the security guy would come round with a list of people and NI numbers asking for explanations of the edits (again, documentary evidence required).

      Contents of the bins were inspected. One of my colleagues (same one as accessed his own record) got in trouble for throwing a piece of paper with a NI number and name jotted down on it. There were separate locked bins provided for that, although I don't know who was responsible for emptying them as they were never emptied during my shift.

      So, for all it's other faults, DWP has very good information security.

    5. Re:Ridiculous by mainframemouse · · Score: 1

      He's a dedicated follower of grammar.

    6. Re:Ridiculous by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      Spelling.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    7. Re:Ridiculous by mainframemouse · · Score: 1

      Singing "He's a dedicated follower of Spelling", just doesn't sound right.

    8. Re:Ridiculous by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      Then you should work harder on your retorts.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  34. Security, you get what you pay for. by Anon-Admin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Most security people are minimum wage. I see people talking about flashing cards and cans of food, etc. This is not a surprise.

    I once entered the R&D area of a fortune 500 company using an ID that was printed on an ink jet printer and had my picture and the CIA logo on it. I was questioned and just flashed the card. That ended all questions.

    When I was managing a computer company, I came back from lunch to find the lead chatting with a guy. The guy introduced him self as the fire marshal and the lead informed me that there was a Fire Inspection going on. The "Fire Marshal" told me I could not go into the back while the inspection was going on. I proceeded to enter the back to find the "Inspector" inspecting the computer equipment. Right out the back door!

    The truth is that most people will not question you, provided you look like you belong and have some form of ID to back it up.

    Now it is time to go to the uniform store and get a security guard uniform. I think ill stand next to the night deposit box at the bank. Just to see how many people will give me there deposits when I tell them that the deposit box it broken and I am there to collect and secure there deposit.

    1. Re:Security, you get what you pay for. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      I saw a demonstration on TV of a guy with a big yellow jacket and walkie-talkie, sitting in a car park with an "Out of order" sign over the ticket machine. He just started taking money off people and writing receipts from an old store log. Uniforms and assertion win every time.

    2. Re:Security, you get what you pay for. by LaRoach · · Score: 1

      I think ill stand next to the night deposit box at the bank.

      It's actually easier than that. About ten years ago someone took a cardboard box with a sign "Night deposit broken, put deposits here" and stuck it next to the night drop. The bank was next to a shopping mall and most of the stores used that bank because it was so close. Something like $15K was put in the box before someone decided to call the cops...

    3. Re:Security, you get what you pay for. by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      In most cases, the ID isn't necessary. "Looking like you belong" is key to infiltrating most kinds of physical security. Walk quickly, look stern, you will likely not even be noticed -- save for the time it takes them to get out of your way. If you're at a badge-required door, pull out a PDA or similar, and look busy. When someone comes along, check the time, look mildly worried, then courteously hold the door open for them after they swipe their badge. They'll thank you for it.

    4. Re:Security, you get what you pay for. by fallen1 · · Score: 1
      Now it is time to go to the uniform store and get a security guard uniform. I think ill stand next to the night deposit box at the bank. Just to see how many people will give me there deposits when I tell them that the deposit box it broken and I am there to collect and secure there deposit.

      Soooo, you've been reading Neil Gaiman's "American Gods" have you? :) I'd be willing to bet it would work just fine if you had a partner to cover your behind on the phone, etc. just so long as the cop questioning you or person depositing didn't know any bank personnel.

      --

      Dream as if you'll live forever.
      Live as if you'll die tomorrow.
      ~Anonymous~

    5. Re:Security, you get what you pay for. by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      >Now it is time to go to the uniform store and get a security guard uniform. I think ill stand next to the night deposit box at the bank. Just to see how many people will give me there deposits when I tell them that the deposit box it broken and I am there to collect and secure there deposit.

      Ahh, you read about that too!

      For anyone who hasn't run into the story, that was a Frank Abagnale exploit. Not his most sophisticated by a long shot, not his most lucrative, but it went off without a hitch.

    6. Re:Security, you get what you pay for. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like that's the same vein as the Bavarian Fire Drill bit from the Illuminatus trilogy...

      Seriously, though, given that our schools are pretty much conformance factories and seem to focus more on teaching students to bow to authority than anything else, why should any of this surprise people? We've been conditioned for a long time to automatically respond to anything that looks like an authority figure.

      More people should play the Paranoia RPG.

  35. Tabloid Alert by linuxwrangler · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While on travel in Chicago a couple years ago I caught a "oh, isn't this dreadful" hand-wringing pieces of journalism where they had "discovered" that even the transit card would open the door to the ATM. They trotted out stories of people who had been mugged after getting their money. So when back home I tried my BART card and it worked fine as well.

    Could they improve the ATM vestibule access? Sure. But would it do any good? I doubt it. Almost everyone has some sort of card that could reasonably be used in an ATM and a mugger can just get you when you walk out or force you in when you get out your card. Or they could use a stolen card.

    Given the default security-settings and install options present on so much software, I suppose I shouldn't be surprised but I am still surprised that a system whose sole purpose is security would make it so easy to allow this sort of misconfiguration. That seems like an option you should be forced to request.

    --

    ~~~~~~~
    "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
  36. whatever by szembek · · Score: 1, Informative

    This summary made shit for sense.

    --
    nothing
    1. Re:whatever by windowpain · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That wasn't a troll. The guy who submitted can't write for shit. There is absolutely nothing inherently insecure about a mantrap. I was puzzled until I rtfa. It's the fact that doors to ATM mantraps are configured to operate with any magnetic stripe card that is the problem. The submitter should have made that clear.

      --
      Insert witty sig here.
  37. Not just electronics... by johnlcallaway · · Score: 1

    Many doors have locks are not installed improperly. Deadlocking latch bolts have an anti-jimmy mechanism (that little slidy thing on the door bolt) that won't let the bolt withdraw if they both aren't in the same position. When the door closes, this part of the lock remains outside of the hole for the bolt.

    Doors with deadlock latch bolts can, with a good swift kick, be pushed far enough into the door jamb for the anti-jimmy mechanism to fall into the strike plate hole. From there, a credit card or thin knife is enough to open the door.

    Many years ago, I was able to open the door at a secured facility for a friend of mine (who worked there and forgot his key) using this method. It only took a few seconds to recognize the problem and open the door. He thought it was wicked funny considering that he was testing some highly-sensitive jet fighter parts in the lab, a lab I wasn't supposed to have access to.
    BR I didn't go in.....

    --
    I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
    1. Re:Not just electronics... by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Tell that to the men in black.

    2. Re:Not just electronics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Many doors have locks are not installed improperly.

      So you're saying that many doors have locks that are properly installed?

  38. security audit by headonfire · · Score: 2, Insightful

    after the (what seems to be) unannounced first break-in attempt and briefing of the employees, any and all results should be considered fairly invalid for at least several months afterwards. Being caught on their second attempt is a no-brainer - hopefully by that point all of the employees have been informed of a security audit, so everyone is going to pay attention, at least for a while.

    I worked in a "secure" government contracting facility for five years. As time passed, we had more and more security audits by both internal and external teams. The external security teams (and other inspectors, in fact) were required to be announced, and somebody always caught them - because management would address the entire staff and say 'Security audit, everyone; be alert for x, y and z happening'!

    Sort of smacks of cheating. Why? Because when the internal teams worked, unannounced, almost every time someone would slip by, usually by riding through a secure door without a badge on someone's coat-tails. Then we'd get chewed out by management, and within a couple of day someone would be caught, thus "bringing us back into compliance". This cycle continued every 6 months or so.

    It's a sham, pure and simple Unless security issues are constantly, CONSTANTLY addressed, and security staff is on the ball and doing their job 24/7, most employees won't give more than a passing thought to it - because it's a pain in the ass to deal with every day, and it feels like the company is just being cheap by using the main workforce as a security guard in addition to their normal duties.

    bah.

  39. What about the company fridge? by Il128 · · Score: 1, Funny

    How do I secure my lunch in the company fridge? When someone can provide an answer to that one the world will be a truly better place!

    --
    Thanks to eating disorders most chicks are reasonably good looking these days.
    1. Re:What about the company fridge? by Wizard+Drongo · · Score: 1

      You can get little lockable safe-boxes about the size of a packed-lunch box, made of steel, so your food stays cold, and requires either a key or one of those combination number locks, so you need the code. And, you can even put one of those freeze-box ice-tablet things inside in case you have to remove it from the fridge for a period of time. Perfect. Might make you appear a tad anti-social though. It's up to you as to whether you care when you're eating your expensive gourmet food in front of your cheap-sarnie workmates, knowing they can't have any!

      --
      The truth shall always be free: Boris Floricic is Tron.
    2. Re:What about the company fridge? by plover · · Score: 1

      Write "fecal sample" on the outside of a brown bag, and put your lunch in it. It helps to have a biohazard logo and a medical cross or snake & staff logo on it, too.

      --
      John
  40. helpful hint by WeAreAllDoomed · · Score: 1
    Lessons: after writing down your password, eat your sticky notes rather than leave them on the monitor.

    if you use indelible ink on plastic instead, you get a password reminder in 14-24 hours!

    --
    free software, open standards, open file formats, no software patents.
  41. Just as secure as luggage locks... by dawnzer · · Score: 1

    It is nice to see that technology doesn't change much. I went to a military school where we would go up on the ski hill late at night and put huge letters made of toilet paper to be seen from the football field below.

    How did we "commandeer" that much toilet paper? The dispensers in the bathrooms had locks, but our mail keys opened them right up. From what I hear that still works.

    --
    "Oh, say, can you see by the dawnzer lee light," sang Miss Binney
  42. Man-trap? Yeah, right... by LanceUppercut · · Score: 1

    Of course, the mention of the man-trap setup (which is, obviously, irrelevant) as well as the entire rerefence to the security system being misconfigured is nothing more than an attempt to hide the painful truth: both the grocery store (the one that issued the card) and the secure facility being tested belong to and run by the same corporation! And the verification requests from the door locks are processed by the same system that processes the shopper card swipes in the store, which immediately explains why the door opened.

    This simple attempt at cover-up can only fool a naive individual that believes that "Bed, Batch and Beyound" and "Linens and Things" are competing stores :)

    1. Re:Man-trap? Yeah, right... by mjkjedi · · Score: 1
      "Bed, Batch and Beyound"
      They sell shell scripts now?
  43. You mean... by NRISecretAgent · · Score: 1

    You mean all that time play videogames that I spent looking for keycards could have been alleviated if I just took my ATM card with me on the mission!? Macgyver strikes again?

  44. Crooks, bums, and bacteria by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    I knew a woman who worked in one of MIT's biotech labs. The labs were generally a mess and grad students were constantly going back and forth between the labs at all hours of the day and night. Unfortunately the local crooks and bums new about the lousy security too and would occasionally steal student's laptops, wallets, purses, etc. I'm sure they also kept an eye out for hypodermic needles.

    One day I came in and she said that someone had come in during the night and opened the small fridge they used for bacterial cultures and drank some bottles with liquid media in them (like a hi-c colored bacterial growth medium). Lucky for the idiot the bacteria were plant pathogens. About a year after, MIT closed the building and rebuilt it into a much nicer, and much more secure, facility.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:Crooks, bums, and bacteria by robpoe · · Score: 1

      Remeber, lunch on the top shelf, e.Coli on the bottom!

      --
      = Grow a brain...
  45. Card Readers by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure card readers are really all that useful, unless you can get everyone there obsessed with security.

    Doors inherently allow multiple people. Whenever I swipe into a building, I hold the door for the people behind me. If I'm coming out of a building, I hold the door for anyone coming in. (This is on a college campus, though, not exactly a facility needing super-security.) Heck, I've opened doors to other buildings because someone was standing outside who forgot their card.

    Unless you can convince me, and even harder, Joe Average, that letting a door slam in someone's face is okay, I think everyone's going to hold the door for people, or stop in the dead of winter to let what's presumably a fellow student / co-worker into their building.

    I suppose the way to fix it is to insist that only one person may use the door at a time, and threaten to terminate on the spot anyone allowing anyone to enter the building with them. And then actually enforce the rule.

    --
    ________________________________________________
    suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
  46. You make a point there at the end... by Demon-Xanth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "It's a good thing people generally like working here"

    At my company, we've gone through two names since 2000 and went from a people loving company to a "people at the top" loving company. I've noticed that even though they've tried to tighten security, less people actually care about security so even though they've tried to close holes, they lost thier company wide security net. There isn't a single employee in my building that gives a rats arse about physical security outside of thier own tools/stuff.

    When I was hired, people would ask where I worked, and that sort of thing. Although it might not be intentionally a security question, it would've caught me if I didn't belong. Now, new hires wander around without anyone ever asking them anything.

    --
    If you think education is expensive, you should try ignorance -- Derek Bok, president of Harvard
  47. I love it! Truth stranger than fiction... by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    Can you imagine Tom Cruise on an impossible mission, faced with trying to enter a secure facility, shrugging his shoulders, and just "pull[ing] every card with a magnetic stripe from [his] wallet"--and discovering that one of them works?

    Who would believe it?

    True, in a 1998 movie called "Wrongfully Accused," Leslie Nielsen, faced with a computer screen asking for "User" and "Password" gets in by typing in "User" into the user field and "Password" into the password field... but you're supposed to think it's a joke.

    1. Re:I love it! Truth stranger than fiction... by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's a joke, but it's only funny because it's so damn true. :)

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    2. Re:I love it! Truth stranger than fiction... by Mantrid42 · · Score: 1

      This, combined with the story above about a guy opening a secure door by kicking it and using a credit card remind me of the scene in Sneakers where Robert Redford, faced with a door with a keypad, gets instructions for a minute or so from his team outside, then kicks the door in.

  48. "Kinda" similar but not really.... by THESuperShawn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My wife has those "Coupon Cards" or "Frequent Shopper" cards for 30 different drug and grocery stores. She used to keep adding new ones to my key chain all the time. Tired of looking like I was hiding quite a package in my pocket al lthe time, I decided to try out a theory of mine. I scanned a stores keychain tag at a totally different store (self checkout, obviously can't hand it to a cashier). Well, it worked just fine. While you obviously won't get credit for the sale (big deal) as who knows what account it goes to, you do get all the "virtual coupons" associated with the card.

    I now just carry one shopping card (Harris Teeter I think). It works at almost every store wherever I travel...CVS, Lowes Foods, Bi-Lo, etc. I just scan the card and it says "Welcome member".

    And FYI. The ATM vestibules- big deal- they are all set to open on any magnetic reader as most banks and credit card companies use different numbers of tracks, data types, and encryption. They don't want to "lock out" members of other banks and not get to charge them a $3.00 "convienience fee" so they let basically any card in. Its not like it gives you access to the ATM if you use a fake card, you just gain access to a vestibule full of video cameras. Its only made as a "deterrant".

    Spelling/Grammer police- I did this from a mobile while in a meeting, I don't feel like jumping through hoops to use a spell check. Just bear with me for now.

    --
    Repant. Thy end is sheer.
    1. Re:"Kinda" similar but not really.... by AndreiK · · Score: 1

      I used to work as a cashier, and those virtual coupons aren't regulated at all. You can always just say you forgot your card, and give them the code "1111111111" which will work just as well as any card you bring in. Or make up a phone number - they all work.

  49. Maybe - clear the fscking factory config? by wsanders · · Score: 1

    6 ) Only an idiot doesn't clear the factory configuration.

    Like OS installs - first thing I do is reset the BIOS and reinstall the OS.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  50. Frequently changed passwords = sticky notes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    While I can remember 1/2 a dozen passwords, I cannot expect my coworkers to do the same.
    Most often there is a sea of sticky notes pasted right on the monitor with the bi-annual password!!!

    To require constant password resets is idiotic. Please use a system that requires them to remember ONE really complicated password or invest in a fingerprint reader which is getting absurdly cheaper.

    1. Re:Frequently changed passwords = sticky notes by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      '' While I can remember 1/2 a dozen passwords, I cannot expect my coworkers to do the same.
      Most often there is a sea of sticky notes pasted right on the monitor with the bi-annual password!!! ''

      A reasonable compromise is a password made of two parts: A really complicated sequence of characters that you write on a sticky note, and something that is easy to remember. Outside hackers cannot get in because of the complicated part, someone sneaking in won't be able to find your dogs name in a short time.

  51. Why not use real people? by boyfaceddog · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you hire someone to sit on a stool inside the door, give them a clipboard with paper printouts including people's names, photos, and some stupid factoid about them, then point a cheap web-cam at the "guard" so they know Big Brother is watching, I bet you get pretty good results. Throw in a tazer, couple of windowless steel fire doors without external key-holes and a big ol' sign that says "Use Other Door" so the poor bastard can take a break or go home, and you're covered.

    Expensive? SURE! As expensive as losing data? Talk to your accountant first.

    --
    Here will be an old abusing of God's patience and the king's English.
  52. The bank didn't rewrite the card. by Kaseijin · · Score: 1

    They don't care what's on it as long as they can use it as a unique identifier.

    1. Re:The bank didn't rewrite the card. by radarsat1 · · Score: 1

      ah... okay.

  53. STFU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry about coward mode, but I am about to say something unpleasant.

    MustardMan, you are clearly the one making gross assumptions. The poster obviously did not know the details of the man-trap system, which were not discussed in great detail within TFA. Like another poster said, Cirrus or other card companies could put an ATM identifer. Mayhaps not for the anti-bum ATM system, but in other applications context dependent man-traps may be handy.

    So, STFU and let the guy ask a question about the man-trap system without being accosted by some know it all prick.

  54. Secure Facility by Renraku · · Score: 1

    People don't understand the importance of a secure facility. All it takes is one dedicated person to cost a company a LOT of money. Unfortunately, its hard to explain to higher-ups and accounting why the facility needs better security than a swipe-card or RFID card for some doors.

    Picture this. A woman is standing outside of the front or side doors of your office struggling with a briefcase and a pocketbook, trying to get a good grip on them. Naturally you'd want to hold the door open for her to make it easier. She in turn holds the door open for her boyfriend, the shady guy your IT department warned you about. He gets in, and Schrodinger's cat leaves the bag at a high rate of speed.

    How will you know what damage he caused until it happens?

    On the other hand, most companies do NOT want to impliment one or two entrances with turnstiles and a manned guard booth keeping watch to make sure no one jumps them. Makes things seem a little too secure.

    A good secure facility would use a security system that's practically transparent. You swipe your RFID card in front of the door, the door makes the card calculate a number, and then approves or denies based on the response. The security guard is alerted if more than one person enters on one swipe. They can take action based on that. There are no sticky notes with passwords. This is stictly enforced. Just like workstations that auto-lock after the user leaves their cube or is inactive for a set time. That would solve most problems right there.

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
  55. In broad daylight by Ernesto+Alvarez · · Score: 2, Informative

    What's a better example of stealing something in plain sight of everyone than stealing two mainframes with confidential data from a secured server room belonging to Australian customs.

    They went in, presented fake credentials, worked in the room a couple of hours, took two machines and nobody suspected a thing until someone noticed the servers were down.

    Anyone can top that?

  56. 1 ... 2 ... 3 ..... You're spotted ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We performed a follow-up assessment six months later, attempting access through the same doorway we had used previously. None of our cards worked this time"

    That sure does sound as there was no "failed attempt made at door number ..." mechanism in place. Stupid, if you ask me.

    Most ATM's will eat your card after three failed attempts, but such an entry-to-secure-area will let you try as many times as you like ?

    That does sound as if someone forgot to think I'm afraid.

  57. heh by JW.Axelsen.Sr. · · Score: 1

    i've been doing that to get to copies of software the IT dept. keeps in a locked supercloset since my freshman year. atm cards from bellco, wells fargo, tcf, and u.s. bank open it right on up and helll-ooooo legit-copy-of-3dsmax-installed...and the dept. heads know that people do this.

  58. Mantrap on OLN by beaverfever · · Score: 1

    Isn't Mantrap a new show on OLN?

  59. Paper towels... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Everyplace I've worked seems to have those nice big glass double doors on the inside lobby entrance with the card reader on the side to unlock the doors. One night I left without my wallet, and my card key was in the wallet. I went back to the doors and they were locked for the night. So I went into the bathroom and got a stack of paper towels. I shot about 2 or 3 of them through the door, and the motion detector saw them and unlocked the doors for me.

    Next day, I told my boss. He thanked me, but the facility manager started shooting me nasty looks. End of the month, my boss gave me a bonus for the info...

    1. Re:Paper towels... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife once worked at an office of MCI (back when they were MCI/Worldcom - blech). In order to get in to the building to pick her up from work, she gave me the passcode to the door (bad security issue #1) which would unlock the magnetic lock - but it wouldn't work. The doors were pretty tall, and the handle to the door was closer to the ground than the top, so I figured I would just use a little leverage. I pulled VERY HARD on the handle (I thought the glass would break), and finally it released. It had one hell of an electromagnet holding it closed, but nothing you couldn't bypass with a little strength. I would imagine most door like this are the same way. So, for smaller doors, you might need to pull a little harder - this is where a tow rope comes in handy.

  60. No Mantrap Here - open air ATM by Dareth · · Score: 1

    Our ATM's are driveup or walkup with no authentification required to get access to them.

    Best practice is to view the area first and make sure it is clear. Have your non-lethal weapon, mace etc, ready in one hand, ATM card in other. Make transaction(s) while still being aware of your surroundings and ready to drop non-lethal weapon and use lethal weapon if necessary.

    Of course, robbing most people for their bank balance around here would be less productive than robbing kids for their lunch money.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  61. Anecdotal, but by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    that incident is evidence against the cliche that "security training doesn't work". The team talked to employees in terms that made sense (humans seem to be hardwired to send and receive stories). The hospital administration must have refrained from de-training the workforce (don't expect security training to stick if the bosses yell at people for slowing work down to follow security procedures).

    The reason nobody can get end users to stop clicking on attachments is that end users are getting trained every day that they should open attachments. Their boss sends them Word documents that they're required to read. They double-click hundreds of times and nothing bad happens. If security training seems not to be working, it's probably because insecurity training is winning.

  62. Floor seats at the concert by Chapter80 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Try this one for the next concert you go to*:

    Buy your tickets online, using TicketMaster's instant delivery mechanism. They email you a PDF that serves as the ticket.

    Scan it in, bring it into photoshop, and edit the seat location. For that matter, use scissors and tape and a copier to modify your seat location. Make sure you make it a front row seat!

    Then when you go to the concert, use the original to get in the door. Use your edited version to wander the floor. Obviously you probably won't have a seat, but you'll be able to get pretty darn close. All because they only scan the ticket at the door. They visually inspect the ticket to see if you are special enough to get up close.

    * Seriously, I would never suggest that you break the law. This idea is purely for entertainment and discussion purposes. Kids, don't try this at home!

    1. Re:Floor seats at the concert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the last Greenday concert we went to, we had the mosh area and right after they checked our tickets at the door, they slapped on a wristband identifying you as special. That might be only for the mosh area but I can't see why that same logic can't be applied to the first N rows, etc.

    2. Re:Floor seats at the concert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, corporate punk music.

      Loser.

  63. Pen test team? by monkeySauce · · Score: 1

    Pen test team? I was thinking of a bunch of people in a room with a brand new box of bic's, scribbling like mad. In fact, until I followed the wikipedia link for pen test, the whole thing sounded like a MacGyver episode.

    Some chick: "Damn! We've got to get though this man-trap security door and we have nothing but a shoppers club card and a box of pens!"

    MacGyver: -pulls out pocket knife- "I'm way ahead of you..."

    1. Re:Pen test team? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I was going to post a separate thread, but I'll just tack on here: it would be helpful if they at least edited the link name from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pen_test to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penetration_test, because the former just redirects to the latter. As it stands, the only useful bit of information in the wikipedia entry is the that the word "pen" is meant as abbreviation for the word "penetration".

      I wonder how many thousand (million?) needless hits on wikipedia this summary could have avoided...

  64. Maybe she just didn't want to get fired by vinn01 · · Score: 1

    If her HR handbook reads like my company's HR handbook, she might have been worried about getting caught on tape letting strangers into the building...

    Section X.X Security - employee responsibilites
    The following activites indicate a serious security violation. These activities may lead to disciplinary action up to and including dismissal: ...
    -Violating security control mechanisms
    -Violating security policies

  65. So my Library Card is useful then :) by VGfort · · Score: 1

    just kidding

  66. It's not just cards... by Lijemo · · Score: 1

    A few years ago I went to the parking lot, let myself into my locked car, turned over the ignition-- and then noticed that my upholstry was the wrong color. I stopped the car and got out-- only to see that MY car, with the correct uphostry and my junk in the back, was parked NEXT to it. Our cars were the same make, same model, same exterior color-- and had the same damn lock & key. If the upholstry hadn't clued me off, I'd have happily driven off with someone else's car, and not noticed until I tried to get my stuff out of the trunk.

  67. lower upkeep, can't "share" your hand by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

    If you're telling me that my college gymnasium had better security than these places, then I am apalled.

    A palm scanner is cheaper in the long run; when you signed up, you didn't have to have an ID printed, or remember a pin, etc. When you go to an on-campus gym, do you have your wallet+campus ID with you? What is to stop you from sharing your ID card?

    You can't "loose" or forget your hand, so they never have to deal with replacing ID cards (which require programming the security system, which requires someone trained+trusted to do so) or resetting PINs. You also can't "share" your hand with your roommate who isn't paying gym dues (if it was required to pay extra for gym access), etc.

  68. That's absolutly true by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    We do the same thing where I work (a university). Our security isn't actually aimed at stopping you from stealing stuff, it's there to be good enough to make insurance happy. Our locks on the computers are easy to cut through. Scisors will do for the cables, small bolt cutters for the locks themselves. I've had to cut a few when I lost the keys. We know you can cut them, that's not the point. The point is it'll stop some random yahoo from wandering out of there with a computer and that's enough for insurance to be happy.

    Most criminals are really dumb thankfully, and a little security does it, hence insurance is happy.

  69. Teleportation: the Jaunt by Old+Man+Kensey · · Score: 1
    I always liked Stephen King's version: "The Jaunt". The rules are:

    1) You can't go through conscious: intelligent beings that go through conscious end up psychologically broken and typically drop dead right after they come out the other end. It appears that going through conscious is equivalent to spending several million (billion?) years in sensory-deprivation limbo.

    2) You have to have a receive station set at the transmission end to get anywhere. But: the transmit end can be set to NULL for the destination. You go in, but you don't come out anywhere. (There's a vignette of a man accused of murdering his wife by Jaunting her to NULL. His lawyer tries to get him off by saying "well, she's not really dead...", which backfires as the jury is so horrified they convict with the maximum sentence.)

    --
    -- Old Man Kensey
  70. I've seen this happen before... by PinkFreud · · Score: 1

    A few years ago, the IT dept. I worked in (for a large mobile phone company) was invited to a presentation by a vendor. We were ushered into a presentation room in the brand new office they had just built nearby. On one wall of this room was a large window and a door, behind which was a number of shiny new servers, intended to impress customers.

    This room was protected by a card swipe.

    One of my co-workers noted the card swipe looked much like the swipes we used back at our office. He took out his id badge (for the company we worked for), and slid it through the swipe. The door to the server room unlocked. Whoops.

    The vendor? Microsoft.

  71. security revolvers by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    Doors inherently allow multiple people. Whenever I swipe into a building, I hold the door for the people behind me. If I'm coming out of a building, I hold the door for anyone coming in. (This is on a college campus, though, not exactly a facility needing super-security.) Heck, I've opened doors to other buildings because someone was standing outside who forgot their card.

    Unless you can convince me, and even harder, Joe Average, that letting a door slam in someone's face is okay, I think everyone's going to hold the door for people, or stop in the dead of winter to let what's presumably a fellow student / co-worker into their building.

    That's why the last place I worked had security *revolving* doors. Man those were a pain, but you sure weren't going to hold the door for anybody. Kind of hard on me, who likes to carry a briefcase, a thermos of coffee, and a huge lunchbox full of snacks ... if anything touches the walls of the door, it stops, makes a nasty announcement, and reverses!

  72. Anybody order a large sausage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dressed as a pizza delivery man and carrying hot, aromatic pizza works, too. ...Wakka Chikka Wakka Chikka.

    As porn movies have taught me... it will not only get you in the door, it will also get you laid!

  73. Re:What about the company fridge? Haberneros! by wilec · · Score: 1

    Always write your name on the bag or container and randomly include an occasional treat liberally laced with haberneros. Haberneros also work pretty well to discourage wild animals and the neighbors dog when used in a spray on things like your garbage can.

    Matthew