Slashdot Mirror


Spanish Region Goes Entirely Open Source

greengrass writes to tell us TechWorld is reporting that the Spanish region of Extremadura has decided to go completely open source with their day-to-day operations. While the region has long been a supporter of open source software, within a year it will be a requirement that all officials use the ODF and PDF formats for all documents. From the article: "Extremadura, Spain's poorest region, made headlines following a 2002 decision to migrate about 70,000 desktops and 400 servers in its schools to a locally tailored version of Debian called gnuLinEx. The government has estimated that the total cost of this project was about 190,000 euros (£130,000), 18 million euros lower than if the schools had purchased Microsoft software. "

160 of 219 comments (clear)

  1. A Goal! by cloricus · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This is what Opensource should be using its power to do. Good work every one!

    --
    I ate your fish.
    1. Re:A Goal! by grcumb · · Score: 2, Funny

      Please, if you're going to use football (sorry, 'soccer') metaphors, at least do it right. It should be:

      "GGGGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALLL LLLLLLL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    2. Re:A Goal! by kripkenstein · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is what Opensource should be using its power to do. Good work every one!

      Yes. A few detailed points:

      1. When you have tens of thousands of desktops, the money saved by not paying Microsoft is so great, that you can even afford to pay people to code a few specific things you need (regional customization, etc.). This is the beauty of the open source stack - you get 99% of the code FOR FREE; salaries for a few good programmers to code the last 1% is cheaper than 70,000 MS licenses. Now, I don't know if the region of Extremadura pay the salaries of the LinEx people; but my point is that even if they did, it would be a huge savings.

      2. That last 1% of code may be GPL (in case it's integrated into the system and not completely standalone, or, even if it is standalone, a government or nonprofit might free the source code anyhow). So others will also be able to benefit from it.

      Back to the article itself, this latest news is very good, and may be another sign of slowly-building momentum for the Open Source movement.

    3. Re:A Goal! by cloricus · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sorry, I'm from Australia...You know, the place that had a slight chance in the last world cup until Itally decided to use our game for diving practice? So it's more like:

      "YOU TOOK A BLOODY DIVE!" ...Funnily enough this is probably what Microsofts price per seat offer will do in the country in question.

      --
      I ate your fish.
    4. Re:A Goal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Here in Spain, Government does pay indirectly to the GPL coders for their adaptations: they open a standarised-by-law public bidding process for contractors which have to suply the adaptations or developments or whatever service is needed. The lowest bidder which has enough technical expertise gets the contract and develops the software, which is then property of the government, and then the government releases as GPL.

    5. Re:A Goal! by Deusy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm almost as pro open source as they come, and this kind of news makes me smile.

      However I really am sceptical of the cost comparisons. They do not seem to take into account distribution or installation or any of the other many factors that come into servicing an entire region with software.

      I also suspect it does not take into account any discounts you may be able to get from Microsoft for such large scale installations.

      Yes, there may be a large difference in licensing. But to say that you are getting a 99% discount is a fallacy. The cost of software is not just in the procurement.

      As a community we should be encouraging responsible reporting so we don't fall into the same obfuscational traps that corporations like Microsoft revel in. It would be nice to be able to have faith in pro Free Software articles rather than approach them with the same sceptism that stigmatises any pro corporate publishing.

      There's no substitute for hard facts and honesty and I feel the open source movement is becoming as marketing savvy as the commercial competition. It may win a bit in the short term but in the long term may undermine the cost-benefits that people perceive.

      --

      Free Gamer - Free games list and commentary

    6. Re:A Goal! by DarkSarin · · Score: 1

      Presumably the cost of deployment, distribution and installation are the same for open source as with closed--provided that you are doing a complete upgrade of everything or a fresh install. In these cases it makes sense to switch.

      It is when you are already using software and are not planning to do a massive system overhaul that these issues become important.

      Frankly, the licensing may not be the only cost, but it is certainly one of the biggest when you are talking about an entire system.

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    7. Re:A Goal! by gutnor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I worked for a company where server were serviced for something like 1000 EUR/month per server. There was not much difference between a Windows Server and a Linux Server ( when you factor the fact that Windows server were smaller box and Linux server were generally more entreprise grade ) except that with the Windows Server you had an initial cost for the OS. After a year, the cost of the initial license wasn't really a point.

      You still can be a little sceptical when you look at the numbers: Total project in 1 year to migrate 70.000 desktop = 130.000 GBP. If you pay a developer less than 10.000 GBP a year in average( not much for qualified personel, even in Spain ) that's a team of 13 persons for 1 year. Manager, coordination and everything included. Well sure that's not a lot.

      Not saying it is not a good think, even if it was more expensive to go opensource. OpenSource and Open Standard makes *especially* more sense for a government. But in this case the difference is so huge, you would like to ask a breakdown of that. It looks too much more like "become an expert C Unix programming in only 8 hours" or "loose 50 kilos in less than 7 days"

    8. Re:A Goal! by Aloriel · · Score: 1

      Silly españoles.
      Excuse me?

  2. Is it just me? by olego · · Score: 5, Funny

    I read that as "Spanish Religion Goes Entirely Open Source", and spent the next few seconds wondering about the implication of this transition.

    1. Re:Is it just me? by 4e617474 · · Score: 1

      Something like this?

      --
      Finally modding someone offtopic when they rant about what "Begging the Question" means: priceless.
    2. Re:Is it just me? by the_womble · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most religions are already open source - apart from the Scientology that is.

    3. Re:Is it just me? by Torstein+Haldorsen · · Score: 5, Funny

      I misread it the same way, and I am in the process of actually founding an "Open Source Religion". A coherent organized worldview that is dynamic, module-based and upgradable. In contrast with the thousands of years old, monolithic, static and all-to-often fundamentalist doctrines that monopolize the religious market today. I say it's about time they get some competition.

    4. Re:Is it just me? by jmv · · Score: 1

      OpenInquisition

    5. Re:Is it just me? by Red+Alastor · · Score: 1
      It already exists.

      http://www.yoism.org/

      Warning, the website contains annoyances, turn off your sound before visiting.

      Their holy book is already at version 0.2. You can join if you want and submit patches.

      And it's very modular, you can remove mysticism from it if you wishes.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    6. Re:Is it just me? by OctaviusIII · · Score: 1

      It is just you, to clarify.

      My region already has open-source religion anyway: gotta love New Agers and their crystals.

      --
      What's this? Another weblog? On transit?
    7. Re:Is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Most religions are already open source - apart from the Scientology that is.

      And look at their forking problems! Proof positive that proprietary religions don't have the same forking problems and open source religions.

    8. Re:Is it just me? by ez666 · · Score: 1

      yeah, exactly I guess they will have lots of trouble

    9. Re:Is it just me? by kripkenstein · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I misread it the same way, and I am in the process of actually founding an "Open Source Religion". A coherent organized worldview that is dynamic, module-based and upgradable. In contrast with the thousands of years old, monolithic, static and all-to-often fundamentalist doctrines that monopolize the religious market today. I say it's about time they get some competition.

      I have heard there are these things called 'science' and 'philosophy', both of which have coherent organized worldviews which are modular and upgradable.

    10. Re:Is it just me? by Mr_Dyqik · · Score: 2, Funny

      Penguinquisition

      or

      Inquistion is Not Quite the Usual InquiSITION

      (guess where I got bored in the previous line)

    11. Re:Is it just me? by dodobh · · Score: 1

      A coherent organized worldview that is dynamic, module-based and upgradable.

      Welcome to Hinduism. Those pesky Indians already did this years ago.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    12. Re:Is it just me? by Eideewt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hey! Don't mix those dirty new-age hippies up with us dirty open-source hippies!

    13. Re:Is it just me? by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      HAHaha very funny. Oh wait... you're not joking, are you?

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    14. Re:Is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well, Christianity is a fork of Judaism; its main selling points being less restrictive input criteria and no need for hardware modifications. Islam is a fork from Christianity that reintroduced some of the features of Judaism 1.x whilst remaining basically incompatible. Satanism is also a fork from Christianity.

      As for the polytheistic religions, they aren't so much forks as localisations. The Norse god Odin, for instance, is the same as the Saxon god Wotan. (except Odin didn't make cheap light bulbs in the 1970s).

    15. Re:Is it just me? by ignavus · · Score: 1

      So people are out there sending in their patches to the holy scriptures ... then someone goes and forks the project.

      So you have ScriptureFree86 and Scripture.org competing with each other, and each of the religous distributions has to decide which branch to take up.

      Meanwhile, the evil MicroScripture.com is preaching that you should give them 10% of everything you earn, if you want to be blest. And they insist that you use their DRM'd Scripture reader that won't allow you to look at alternative versions.

      Nah, it will never work. back to the Closed Source Brethren.

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
    16. Re:Is it just me? by Gabesword · · Score: 1

      Well, that sounds a little bazaar but if it gets people out of the cathedral I say go for it.

    17. Re:Is it just me? by Akdor+1154 · · Score: 1
      I misread it the same way, and I am in the process of actually founding an "Open Source Religion". A coherent organized worldview that is dynamic, module-based and upgradable. In contrast with the thousands of years old, monolithic, static and all-to-often fundamentalist doctrines that monopolize the religious market today. I say it's about time they get some competition.

      Sorry, mate, it's already been done: Shazanity - the world's first Wiki-based religion! :)
    18. Re:Is it just me? by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      As a hindu with Indian origins, I can assure you that although we are "dynamic, module-based and upgradable." we are not, by any stretch of the imagination, organised. ;D

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    19. Re:Is it just me? by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Unitarian Universalism?

    20. Re:Is it just me? by dodobh · · Score: 1

      As a Hindu in India, I can assure you we are just as organised as the Free Software and Open Source communities. Organised chaos.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    21. Re:Is it just me? by Ruphuz · · Score: 1

      Most religions are already open source - apart from the Scientology that is.

      Nonsense. If Linux was as open source as the religions you mention, you would never get to see the kernel, and you would have to trust the drivers to interact with it for you.

      Oh, wait...

      --
      My other post is a First.
  3. gnuLinEx by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is this just a localised Linux distro, or does it have other specific properties? Small footprint, extra security, that sort of stuff? TFA weren't too clear about that, and the gnuLinEx website was a bit... Spanish.

    --
    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
    1. Re:gnuLinEx by atomicstrawberry · · Score: 5, Informative

      Based off here it looks like it's basically Debian Sarge with a set of useful applications - I assume the ones that have different names eg Zurbarán (Gimp 2.2) are localised builds.

    2. Re:gnuLinEx by 4e617474 · · Score: 5, Informative

      From what I could find, it's mostly a localized Debian with a few tweaks for ease-of-use and some educational apps and such. Review linked by distrowatch.

      --
      Finally modding someone offtopic when they rant about what "Begging the Question" means: priceless.
    3. Re:gnuLinEx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      The main advantages of the distro seem to be the creation of system to install programs via the browser (after root authentication). They have also developed a program to update free distributions with non-free amenities Windows users typically take for granted: namely Java, Flash, the ability to read commercial DVDs and Real and DivX codec support. The installation seems to be based on Redhat's installation system (anaconda) and it has the ability to resize existing NTFS partitions. They've also got a centralized "control panel" where one may install packages, update the distro, etc... The core of the distro consists of: Gnome 2.14, X.org 6.9, with specific updates for Intel 945 chipsets, Linux 2.6.16, with support for Core 2 duo as well as ipw3945 as well as nVidia, ATI, firmware ipw2*00 and ipw3945, etc.

    4. Re:gnuLinEx by Xavier_OM · · Score: 1
      --
      "I won't be a rock'n'roll star. I will be a legend." Freddie Mercury
    5. Re:gnuLinEx by kripkenstein · · Score: 1

      The latest LinEx (6/06) has an up-to-date Linux kernel, and likewise GNOME (2.6.16, 2.14.1 respectively), which is useful (Debian Sarge has much older versions).

      Looks like some nice work on the part of the Spanish Linux people. Also, they deserve congratulations on their success detailed in the article.

    6. Re:gnuLinEx by xtracto · · Score: 5, Informative
      Well, I can read spanish, and after reading the What's new information I found two or three quite interesting things. I will try to summarize them here:

      • Primer arranque (First boot): Allows graphics booting using gfxboot, something quite nice for "normal" users, as I remember my flatmate got scared at the Ubuntu screen boot, with the list of the [OK] and [FAILED] services status (background here).
      • Instalación (Installing): Just a graphical installer with graphical partition resizing, I saw this already when installing Ubuntu and Mandriva.
      • Más comodidad (More confortability [is that a word?]): Just the old root/user password option with automatic login.
      • Un Escritorio más vivo (more alive desktop),Mantente a la última (stay at the edge), El nuevo Actualizar LinEx (New LinEx Update): Some desktop backgrounds, system update and package installer. Nothing too fancy IMHO.
      • Aptéalo con APTZILLA ("Aptate it" with APTZILLA) : This is something which I believe is worth to mention, I have never seen something simillar in any other distribution. It seems to be a Firefox extension that enables to install software from an internet page. It would be very interesting to try it because from what it seems it would be a way to achieve the "click+download+click^x+install" behaviour in Windows for the end user (my father for example wont be able to install Repast framework in Ubuntu because it is not in the repositores, whereas to install it on Windows he just have to download the installer and run it).
      • El Panel de Control de gnuLinEx: A control panel similar to what a lot of other distributions have. HOWEVER I find quite relevant that they embed the WINE emulator (which btw I.N.an E.), I imagine they try to make as easy as possible to enable Windows applications to run in Linux. That is the other property worth to note, as I have not seen any distribution that gives so much importance to it (well, besides the commecial distros like xandros, lindows [ya ya I like to call it Lindows], etc).
      • El wiki personal (The Personal Wiki [see, spanish is not that hard]): That is the other interesting application, which a wiki like note taker (the application seems to be Tomboy.


      Well, all the other properties I did not listed are the ones that I have seen in other distributions.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    7. Re:gnuLinEx by jonathansizz · · Score: 1
      From what I could find, it's mostly a localized Debian with a few tweaks for ease-of-use and some educational apps and such.
      Wait a second. How many Ubuntu stories are we going to have today?
  4. Microsoft won't back down by hopopee · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Soon they'll propose a counter offer that costs less than the open-source solution.. for the next few years. Then they concentrate on taking the deciding parties to cruises, trips to USA and Bahamas etc. to keep them from ever again even thinking about migrating to another system. Or maybe I'm just becoming a bit jaded? :-)

    1. Re:Microsoft won't back down by Anti-Trend · · Score: 1
      They already migrated in 2002. TFA is about extending this decision even further. FTA:

      "The new decision will extend the use of LinEx from schools to all civil servants and finally all of the region's administrative offices. The government didn't say how many systems would be migrated. The plan calls for all applications to be open source as well. The standard document format will be ODF (Open Document Format), with PDF used when exact visual appearance must be preserved."

      --
      Working in a DevOps shop is like playing in a band made up entirely of keytarists.
    2. Re:Microsoft won't back down by sjwest · · Score: 1

      But will Balmer throw a spanish chair or an american chair at the incompetant microsoft spainish employee.

  5. Good by Wylfing · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Good. Now if only my local government would listen to me and stop wasting millions of dollars on MS licenses. (Their "compatibility" issue boils down to being compatible with the printer -- they always print out their stuff on letterhead and mail it through the post!)

    --
    Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it.
    1. Re:Good by njh · · Score: 1

      My work switched all the printers over from windows to linux running cups and samba. It was easier to get them working and keep them working.

      I've never had a problem with a shop bought printer under CUPS either.

    2. Re:Good by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      However, if your in an organisation your likely to have a single printer for a large number of workstations, in which case it's much easier:

      If your print server is running CUPS in the same subnet as the workstations, and is configured to share it's printers, all the workstations which are running cups (including osx by default) will automatically detect the printer and add it to the list of available printers, you don't need to install any drivers on the workstations because the server handles the translation of postscript into whatever the printer is expecting.

      As for difficulty setting up a printer on linux, pretty much all modern printers from reputable manufacturers are USB based, and get detected automatically by a modern linux system when connected, no need to install drivers from a cd or anything, and this is just lowend consumer printers...
      When you get to high end printers, they virtually all support postscript which has been the native printing protocol of unix for years.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    3. Re:Good by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Well then your running a distro which is too old, i imagine a current version would have this driver by default.
      You'd have the same problem trying to use this printer on an old version of windows too, only the fix (to upgrade to a newer version) would cost you money and might force you to upgrade other parts of your system.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    4. Re:Good by jc87 · · Score: 1

      Good. Now if only my local government would listen to me and stop wasting millions of dollars on MS licenses

      Let me guess , you are Portuguese to ;)

      --
      def greetings(x): return {'friend': 'Howdy', 'enemy': 'Dye [sic]'}.get(x, 'g0 4w4y, l4m0r')
    5. Re:Good by burnin1965 · · Score: 1

      "The Linux way is more time intensive."

      You don't use linux, do you.

      Admittedly you do have to be careful about which printer you purchase to use with linux but its really not that difficult. Most printers are supported by linux and in the case of the most popular manufacturers, HP and Epson, its almost guaranteed to be compatible with drivers already included with your linux install.

      As a linux user I go one step further and try to support the manufacturers that support me. HP has an entire open source project to support their printers in linux and most distros include that package. That being the case I can tell you that a recent experience installing an HP printer on a Windows machine and the same printer on a linux machine was quite interesting.

      The printer was an HP PSC-1400 all in one printer. On the Windows machine the process was pretty much as you had stated, however, since it is an all in one printer it was necessary to install additional software from the included CD to make all the printers features available, so the process was drawn out with lots of dialogs and lots of reboots, pretty lame.

      The linux box on which an PSC-1400 was installed had Fedora Core 5 and no discs were needed because when I added a printer the HP open source drivers were already there. The printer worked out of the box with a much faster and easier setup than the Windows box with no reboots, swapping discs, just one add printer dialog and away it went. The Fedora Core 5 install also had The Gimp preinstalled and xsane and guess what, it saw the scanner in the PSC-1400 and it just worked. So the scanner setup was easier too. And another bonus was the fact that the image scanning and editing software included with the linux install was many times better than the crappy Windows software I had to install.

      While you still need to use some caution when selecting printers for use with linux its no where near as difficult as you portray it and in fact with many printer choices the process is even simpler than the Windows route and you end up with better software packages to utilize your new toys.

    6. Re:Good by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      That's the fault of redhat and epson...
      RedHat is very much designed around you updating the entire distro every year, and there's really nothing to stop you either, contrast that with windows where an upgrade will cost you. Also, XP may be 5 years old now, but it's yet to be replaced with a newer version.

      You could always use a rolling distro, like debian or gentoo, where the entire system gets updated gradually as you go along, instead of in one large jolt like redhat.
      (for comparison, my machine was originally installed using one of the very earlier versions of gentoo - from before there was really an installguide, and you had to follow help on irc... and it has all the latest packages on it now)

      On another note, why wouldnt you want to upgrade the entire os? the new versions will have many things to offer you (and you can always remove stuff you dont want) and unless your running some very strange third party kernel modules, it's not going to break anything your already using.

      So basically, it's not expected for people to be running old versions of linux, since upgrading is free and painless, there's really no reason not to have the latest versions.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  6. No, no... the GP post was alluding to: by PaulBu · · Score: 3, Funny

    "NOBODY expects the Spanish Inquisition!" ;-)

    Paul B.

  7. Vista makes it worse, actually... by jkrise · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What exactly do schools look for in "Computer curriculum"? Most I know only look for a browser, a HTML editor and some presentation s/w on the clients side. The servr side is mostly some Courseware s/w - Moodle or Drupal; LDAP; Centralised File System etc.

    There has been no incentive for schools to upgrade from Windows 98, indeed many schools near me have about 80% of their systems running Win98, and the students are quite happy with what they're getting. There's absolutely no incentive to upgrade to WinXP (although a RAM upgrade might allow XP to run).

    Schools in fact have every reason to ask Microsoft WHAT EXACTLY they get in return for Big $$ they need to shell out in MS upgrades. If they switch (the servers are already on Linux) the clients also to Linux, schools will have absolutely zero incentive to upgrade to Vista.

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    1. Re:Vista makes it worse, actually... by mindtriggerz · · Score: 1

      I go to school in Kentucky, and KDE has one of the largest Active Directory trees in the world. We *had* to upgrade to XP. As for curriculium, all the Comp Apps classes teach Office, the school runs STI (ugh, hate it, crashes once a day), and various other windows-only apps are used throughout.
      We are getting Moodle integrated, but all our main servers are 2k or 2k3.

    2. Re:Vista makes it worse, actually... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Here's the biggest problem with schools right now.
      They teach you a single application, instead of the general concept of how such applications work.

      when i went to school, we had Acorns running various word processing and spreadsheet apps, and later we had intel boxes running first wordperfect for dos, and later wordperfect for windows 3.1 (tho the dos version was still installed too).

      Because all the computer rooms in the school had different software and different machines, they had to teach us generally how these apps worked, rather than the recent trend of teaching people by a single app by repetition.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    3. Re:Vista makes it worse, actually... by xdxfp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While I tend to agree with you, schools face a tremendous market pressure to go with the latest technology "fad". My old high-school put desktops in the back of every classroom. Since there's only 8 per classroom, no one ever uses them. Next, they wanted to get laptops for every student (despite the fact they would get lost, stolen, etc). This kind of stuff is constant.

      How many soccer-moms see the Microsoft commercials on TV (which claim that Windows "inspires" children), and vote at school-board meetings to have a $1,500 laptop for every kid? It was more than 50% in my district.

      --
      HRESULT WinAPIGetSystemProcessThreadMetricsMenu...
      LibraryVolumeModuleHandlePtrEx(PHSPTMMLVM PHndl);
    4. Re:Vista makes it worse, actually... by tubs · · Score: 1

      Hmm, except thats not all they want.

      Have a look at http://www.curriculumonline.gov.uk/Default.htm - and then be amazed when you see how many exotic programs there are that teachers say are "fundemental" to their subject.

      And then cry at how many don't support silent installs, and do funny things to the registry or store files outside of "program files", or use old versions of flash so that the new security functions cause them to break or need vesions x y or z of some java virtaul machine, or won't work on a network or or or or

      --

      try to make ends meet, you're a slave to money, then you die

    5. Re:Vista makes it worse, actually... by johansalk · · Score: 1

      I don't know what is meant by computer curriculum but I have been very impressed by extremadura using Squeak in their schools. There's a video about it on google groups.

  8. Judgement day by owlman17 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hasta la vista, Microsoft.

    1. Re:Judgement day by bky1701 · · Score: 1

      Hasta siempre comandante, Linux!

  9. Re:190,000Euro divided by 70,400 computers..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    IT staff? They probably let the IT staff produce a big guide to the new OS, and had everyone install it themselves on company time. Probably not included in the price tag.
     
    Of course this means they lost some productivity through this, which just drives home the point that if you need to lose productivity, the cost may be difficult to measure but it can't possibly be as high as the productivity loss caused by M$ products.

  10. Simple math by orzetto · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The government has estimated that the total cost of this project was about 190,000 euros, 18 million euros lower than if the schools had purchased Microsoft software.

    Good argument for GNU, Linux and open source in general with your boss: cuts your software costs by 98.9%. Finally someone puts an official number on this.

    --
    Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
    1. Re:Simple math by chemisus · · Score: 1

      As a college student, I have based all of my research papers or speeches around computer related topics. Most of my persuasive type projects have been solely on switching the campus from windows to linux.

      Problem is, the network administrator is a dumbass who just sits in his office all day and watches dvd's. Meanwhile, the "back up image" that is ghosted over the network to a computer that malfunctions was created from a computer that had already been loaded with all kinds of spyware and other junk on it. Quite amusing really.

      Good thing this came up, as I have another persuasive speech to do on friday. Might be able to update my sources with it.

  11. Nobody by Life700MB · · Score: 2, Funny


    Nobody expects the now Open Source based Spanish Inquisition!


    --
    Superb hosting 20GB Storage, 1_TB_ bandwidth, ssh, $7.95

  12. Credit by indrax · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think 'Extremadura' would be an awesome name for a release of a major distro.

    1. Re:Credit by Chaffar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, I believe "Extremadura" means "Extremely Hard" in Spanish, so it should be a better fit for a well-equiped Spanish pornstar than for a major distro.

    2. Re:Credit by MBMarduk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Extremadura actually means "extra mature" so this would be like Grandma-ILF quality pr0n.










      (*No peeps, I'm a native spanish speaker so need to point out the obvious ;-)

    3. Re:Credit by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      And if that pornstar was also into snowboarding, motocross, and skydiving, he could be called Xtremadura.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    4. Re:Credit by expressionist · · Score: 1

      The name comes from the time that this land was the southern 'extreme' border of the christian kingdoms of Spain, during the war against the muslim kingdoms of the south. And the 'dura' ending (hard) perhaps refers to the fact they had a hard time fighting for it...

    5. Re:Credit by atomico · · Score: 1

      It is in fact an old joke... There is even a well known rock group called 'Extremoduro', see http://www.extremoduro.com/

    6. Re:Credit by White+Manual · · Score: 1

      While it is true that "dura" by itself means "hard", "dura" as a sufix is just a way to create a noun from a verb (eg, salpicadura), from another noun (eg, arboladura), or, as in this case, from an adjective. On the other hand, the real meaning of the adjective "extrema" in this context is "farthest" (from Rome).

    7. Re:Credit by CptPicard · · Score: 1

      I thought it would be a great name for a heavy-duty condom...

      --
      I want to play Free Market with a drowning Libertarian.
  13. It takes time, but it happens by RoLi · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Slowly, but steadily, Linux is gaining ground.

    With every year, MS Windows loses another advantage or another killer-feature and the playground - while far from fair - gets a little bit more leveled.

    I still remember the mid-late 90s, when you still had to recompile the kernel for sound (now it's autodetected), when there was no office suite (StarOffice came IIRC somewhen around 1998), when there was no KDE.

    Of course, in many areas (especially gaming) Windows is de-facto without competition, but these areas become smaller with each year.

    For the pioneers like Extremadura and Munich, a lot of political will and forsightness was needed.

    For those governments that come later this political will won't be needed (or let's say not nearly as much will be needed) as the migration will be easier, cheaper and faster than in Extremadura or Munich - because of the experience made there, because some programs will already be ported, because the software was developed further.

    In the next years, the biggest chance for OpenSource are the OpenDocument formats. While the old .doc format will remain "the standard" for quite some time, I think OpenDocument has good chances beating Microsoft's new XML format and becoming the standard in maybe 10 years. (Mainly because MS XML doesn't offer the advantage of the old .doc format (= being established) and has no advantage versus OpenDocument)

    If that happens, MS Office loses it's dominating grip, Microsoft loses a lot of revenue and the ability to fund expensive pet-projects like XBox - and Windows loses another advantage...

    1. Re:It takes time, but it happens by commanderfoxtrot · · Score: 1

      That's because it's been a sitting target.

      Vista is coming out soon, which will shift the goal-posts.

      MS presented it to us at my company - little there to tempt us, but lots of flashy effects to wow consumers. And you know that new computers will come with it installed as a given.

      The new Office though- that's quite interesting...

      --
      http://blog.grcm.net/
    2. Re:It takes time, but it happens by ajs318 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly!

      Open Source is based around Economics of Plenty, rather than Economics of Scarcity. IR1 promised to usher in the Age of Plenty. IR2 actually created a product which is truly plentiful, having zero cost of replication.

      In Economics of Scarcity, some portion of the value of things depends on how hard they are to get hold of. In Economics of Plenty, things are not at all hard to get hold of. Because we've been living in an age of scarcity for so long, we've tended to neglect that portion of value that does not depend on scarcity, and in fact some have sought to manipulate values by creating artificial scarcity: in the most egregious cases, overproducing goods in order to bring down the unit costs through economies of scale {itself taking advantage of Plenty}, then destroying much of the production in order to increase its market value. |Example: it costs little more to make six Widgets than to make three; but if there are four potential customers, then you'll get more money for each one if they are arguing over only three Widgets than if there are enough Widgets to go around.

      One of the "counter-intuitive" {though note, there is nothing intuitive about Economics of Scarcity, being purely learned behaviour} things about Economics of Plenty is that the value of goods actually goes up when demand increases. {Side note: we are seeing this same phenomenon with recyclable materials in household waste, which are currently Plentiful. As recycling rates improve, recyclables will begin to obey Scarcity laws again.}

      Another -- and this is what really rankles with anyone coming from a background of the Economics of Scarcity -- is that dividends are paid to investors in proportion to the total amount invested, rather than the individual's investment. The Sum Total of Open Source gets better everytime anyone improves an Open Source project; anyone who joins the Movement benefits from all the improvements that have come before, and the later you join, the more benefit you gain.

      Now, many people have been brought up to resent the idea that someone else might benefit from their hard work. In the Age of Scarcity, that might have made some sense, since the only way you could get richer was by someone else getting poorer. But in the Age of Plenty it does not matter: one person's gains need not be balanced by another person's losses. Everyone can gain together.

      It takes someone with real vision, and who does not mind making a large initial investment knowing that others will eventually benefit from it as much as they did, to see that.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    3. Re:It takes time, but it happens by RoLi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That's because it's been a sitting target.

      Yes, because what most people do with computers today (essentially word-processing, email and websurfing) is a solved problem and except for bugfixes there is little demand for anything "new". Actually, quite contrarily most people don't want anything new.

      That's the main reason why the transition to Linux takes so long. The advantages have to overcome the resistance of anything new or different.

      MS presented it to us at my company - little there to tempt us, but lots of flashy effects to wow consumers. And you know that new computers will come with it installed as a given.

      So you honestly think that "flashy effects" will "shift the goal-posts? Honestly?

      Sure Vista will be installed on new computers, but people tend to keep their old computers for longer and longer times. IIRC it took WinXP 4-5 years to get to 50% of the installed base of Windows. The truth is that most people would be perfectly happy with a bug-free version of Windows 95, a system that is already over 10 years old.

      "Flashy effects" will not shift any goal-post.

      Actually, as I already said, people want to be left alone when it comes to computers. They want to keep using the same software because it already does anything they would remotely want for many years. The way I see it, Vista will take an awful long time to get on to the majority of running Windows-machines, certainly longer than XP did. Even if we assume 5 years (very optimistic as the PC-market is even more saturated than when XP came out) that moment wouldn't come before 2012.

      Actually the temptation for Microsoft to somehow force customers to Vista will be quite big and may be a big push for Linux.

      Let's take Munich as an example: The city was perfectly happy with it's Windows NT4 architecture and would certainly still run it today if Microsoft didn't drop support for it.

      When Microsoft drops support for Win2K, many customers will wonder wether some bugfixes are really worth all that money for licenses, new hardware, retraining, etc.

      Also, you seem to miss the main point:

      Microsoft already owns almost 100% of the "consumers" because of computer games. Even if they "wow" consumers, it won't matter a lot because they will go from almost 100% to almost 100%.

      The interesting field of the desktop is not the "consumer" desktop.

      • It's the desktop in callcenters or other workstations (for example 3d-modelling where Linux has already made great advances) that only need to run a single (or very few) applications.
      • It's the desktop of governments that benefit hugely from OpenSource because all the costs go to the local economy and about half of that comes back via taxes.

      "Flashy effects" may wow consumers but they won't have any effect on governments or callcenters.

      After many niches will be filled by Linux and after the important applications have been ported to these niches (what we saw in 3D-modelling 3-4 years ago and currenty see in government and callcenters), the next step will be the general-purpose corporate desktop. (the consumer desktop will come much, much later)

    4. Re:It takes time, but it happens by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      The new Office though- that's quite interesting...

      What, and you think that will actually help Microsoft? The biggest reason most people have for not switching to OpenOffice is "but I'd have to re-learn the interface!"

      The new version of MS Office will be great for OpenOffice, because if people are going to have to learn a new interface anyway, they might as well learn a free one!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    5. Re:It takes time, but it happens by RoLi · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking the same thing. A lot of people will not want the new interface and will rather use OpenOffice (which is pretty similar to the current MS Office interface) or keep their old version as long as possible than upgrade.

    6. Re:It takes time, but it happens by Qrlx · · Score: 1

      Just wondering: Is there a real example of overproducing goods to bring unit cost down, then destroying the produced goods to correct for the lesser demand?

    7. Re:It takes time, but it happens by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Yes: all British and European farming runs on exactly that principle.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  14. Re:190,000Euro divided by 70,400 computers..... by juahonen · · Score: 1

    Why use IT staff? Schools are full of eager nerds who would love to hold an install fest...

    There are many schools in Finland for example, which have student-maintained computer classrooms, school servers, web pages, etc. However, the higher level education a school offers, the less likely it is to find students maintaining the IT infrastructure...

  15. Re:190,000Euro divided by 70,400 computers..... by Murodese · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm sure that with some thought they could cut that down to x minutes per infinite computers (unattended installations, etc), which would certainly make the price tag seem more logical.

  16. For your information... by jkrise · · Score: 2, Informative

    Fedora Directory Services is a very robust implementation of LDAPv3, and is available under GPL. FDS also allows integration with Craptive Directory. Moodle and many other Courseware come with LDAP integration, so there's no problem if the school really wants to go in for Open Source.

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
  17. Re:Good double-PLUS good... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    It's not just those government offices. It's also all those suck-up, KISS-ASS computer companies that have the VAPID, disGUSTING gall to slap on their hardware the stickers that say:

    "(kiss-ass-hardware company) recommends microsoft windows XP home edition..."

    "(kiss-ass-hardware company) recommends microsoft windows XP professional edition..."

    "(kiss-ass-hardware company) recommends microsoft windows 2000 edition..." ...

    As IF the consumer (nevermind the wiser PROsumer...) has a frackin' choice. These snivelly-ass companies are accepting marketing dollars for ms and whoring their names on the labels, stickers, and box art. THERE ARE NO other choices coming from MOST manufacturers, and the prosumers and adventurous consumers are ate least trying out Linux/Debian.

    It ought to be illegal the SHIT ms gets away with.

    It's like recommending "Milk. It does YOUR body good". Then they dairy council gets sued, and they change to:

    "Milk. It does A body good."

    With all the virii and other bullshit incessantly bringing up the cost of ownership of ms windoze products, its amazing that the industry has not demanded more Linux-based native apps to get off windoze.

    -- lame file system... STILL needs defragging in XP/2K. What will vista have?

    -- an admin logging off users STILL blows out any work they may have open as drafts. If ms is SOOOOO innovative, then WHY in the hell in the past 6 years have they NOT rewritten windoze to save the endangered draft docs/files as "admin-shutdown-draft 2006-07-31-1422-wordfile.doc" or "sysadmin-shutdown-draft 2006-07-31-1422-outlook.olk"....

    Even if security is a problem, the SYSADMIN on the machine should be able to save the file and do the work that the crappy design causes them to do in reboot or log-user-out mode.

    Open Source Devs... I think Linux needs something to deal with my 2nd comment, for those systems where the admin needs to bring down a multi-user machine... (presume the kids/family/housemate users left home and left drafts open but their session locked/screen-saved...) for maintenance or hardware change. It would be a "nice to have to be nice and behave" feature...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  18. Re:Good double-PLUS good... by XanC · · Score: 1

    Doesn't that work in Linux? I know from my own experince running KDE that when X crashes (I'm running the binary nvidia driver, sorry, but it only happens once every few weeks), when I log back in to KDE there's everything just the way I left it. Surely bringing down the system entirely wouldn't be more disruptive than that.

  19. Re:190,000Euro divided by 70,400 computers..... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    Thank God there is not a Nerd Union that would require one nerd per each install.

    Keep in mind that Corey's method for arriving at $18/hour is totally asinine.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  20. Spain is a socialist country these days... by CptSpatula · · Score: 2, Funny

    Seriously, I wonder how long it will be before a direct mental connection between Open Source and socialism develops in the minds of Americans. It'd be an easy weapon to deploy against Linux.

    1. Re:Spain is a socialist country these days... by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      Maybe in the 1970s. Today, people who make decisions see through that BS.

    2. Re:Spain is a socialist country these days... by iogan · · Score: 1
      Seriously, I wonder how long it will be before a direct mental connection between Open Source and socialism develops in the minds of Americans. It'd be an easy weapon to deploy against Linux.
      Seriously, I wonder how the direct mental connection between socialism and Spain developed in your mind.

      I'm guessing they became socialist around the same time as they pulled their troops from Iraq?
    3. Re:Spain is a socialist country these days... by davaguco · · Score: 2, Informative

      Saying that Spain is socialist is knowing very little about spanish politics. Even if the political party in charge of the government actually is called "socialist" party, it's politics have absolutely nothing to do with what you can find in any book that socialism is.

      --
      Please google and research "peak oil" a bit. You will discover this crisis is a lot worse than they have told you
    4. Re:Spain is a socialist country these days... by bky1701 · · Score: 1

      There isn't one now? And that's a bad thing, anyway? Windows is totally capitalistic, so...

    5. Re:Spain is a socialist country these days... by finkployd · · Score: 1

      I hate to burst your bubble, but the US us clearly a socialist country these days as well.

      Finkployd

  21. Re:From Spain by Don_dumb · · Score: 3, Informative
    ..."both" your fathers?
    A mistake in translation I think.
    I assume the parent means "both parents", as in Spanish - father is 'el padre', mother is 'la madre', but both together are 'los padres'. This masculine dominance happens with many words for people :- for example, the word for 'sibling' uses the word for brother. I am learning Spanish and this can confuse as naturally I assume that someone is talking about their brothers, when they could also mean their sisters as well.
    --
    If this were really happening, what would you think?
  22. Re:From Spain by eldepeche · · Score: 1

    padres = parents

  23. Re:Good double-PLUS good... by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1
    Open Source Devs... I think Linux needs something to deal with my 2nd comment, for those systems where the admin needs to bring down a multi-user machine... (presume the kids/family/housemate users left home and left drafts open but their session locked/screen-saved...) for maintenance or hardware change. It would be a "nice to have to be nice and behave" feature...

    Done, but you're not going to like what I charged you. ;)

    On most of the Linux distros I've used, xscreensaver will accept either the user's password or root's password. If it doesn't, or if the user is using an esoteric screensaver program, switch to the console, log in as root, kill the screensaver process, and switch back.

  24. Proof that MS-fanboys just don't get it. by RoLi · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Comments like these just flow over from ignorance and stupidity.

    Let's review the statement from Extremadura:

    The government has estimated that the total cost of this project was about 190,000 euros, 18 million euros lower than if the schools had purchased Microsoft software.

    Do you think that "Before buying printer, check Linux compatability at linuxprinting.org." is included in these 190,000 Euros? (= well over 200.000 US Dollars)

    Do you think that they called vendors ahead before they bought whatever was needed to upgrade 70,000 computers to the new printing-needs?

    Do you think that they called vendors ahead before they set up printers for 70,000 computers, no matter if run on Linux or Windows?

    OK, I fully admit it:

    For some gamer who runs a single computer in a basement, Linux is probably not the prime choice. Even for many non-gaming home users Linux might not be the best choice.

    But this is about a government organization that:

    • Doesn't need games
    • Runs so much hardware that the cost for checking out (or even creating fixes or workarounds for) hardware-compatibility is neglectible
    1. Re:Proof that MS-fanboys just don't get it. by killjoe · · Score: 2, Informative

      LArge organizations like that tend to have an IT team. The IT team tends to dictate which printers are bought.

      Have you ever worked for a company? Check with you school. You will see that they too make centralized decisions about which printers are bought and installed.

      Anyway most printers are supported by linux. There are few windows only printers but they are pretty rare because the printer companies want to sell to mac users too (mac and linux use the same printer subsystem)

      --
      evil is as evil does
    2. Re:Proof that MS-fanboys just don't get it. by CubicleView · · Score: 1

      I've personally never used Linux, the reason being I've never had any major problems with windows, and my work revolves around several windows specific coding tools. I'm also a "gamer" and many games will of course only run on windows, though I don't own a basement (perhaps you could elaborate on why windows is the best choice of OS for a pc in a basement?) The parent comment may have been incorrect but it was not rude nor did it suggest anyone was stupid or ignorant. Time and again I see "zealots" making derogatory comments about windows "fanboys" which in my opinion comes across as childish and small minded. Not everyone wants the hassle of switching OS or running duel boot systems that does not mean they are stupid, ignorant or "fanboys".

    3. Re:Proof that MS-fanboys just don't get it. by Aloriel · · Score: 1

      Actually Extremadura's goverment launched a game distro: JuegaLinex.

    4. Re:Proof that MS-fanboys just don't get it. by RoLi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The parent comment may have been incorrect but it was not rude nor did it suggest anyone was stupid or ignorant.

      Implying that the time of anybody who uses Linux is without value, is rude.

      Not everyone wants the hassle of switching OS or running duel boot systems that does not mean they are stupid, ignorant or "fanboys".

      True.

      But to talk about printer-setup for a single computer when the topic is a government with 70,000 PCs switching to Linux IS stupid, ignorant and "fanboyish". So I stand to everything I wrote.

      It seems that no matter the topic (for example in stories about embedded systems, servers, clusters or big governmental installations) some people are either knowingly (which would be fanboyish) or not knowingly (which would be ignorant and stupid) talk about personal home desktops.

      Even you seem to fanatically stick to home desktop systems. OK, maybe I was not clear enough:

      This is not about home desktops. Forget dual boot, forget games, forget users failing to install hardware (that's the IT-department's job), forget all that.

      Also, it's "dual-boot", not "duel-boot". Nobody is dueling.

      Also, just FYI, setting up printers with Linux isn't nearly as difficult as the grandparent wanted to suggest, almost all printers are autodetected. But that is offtopic here.

    5. Re:Proof that MS-fanboys just don't get it. by CubicleView · · Score: 1

      I still stand by my original comment, though admittedly I should have pointed out that it was so far off topic from the TFA that it could be considered a dot (the other bit that is, the duel stuff was just a typo). I'm actually sitting at home in my basement right now, fanatically clinging to my gaming windows pc, blissfully uninterested in TFA. Anyway, my comment had more to do with the subject "Proof that MS-fanboys just don't get it." And your first line "Comments like these just flow over from ignorance and stupidity." So to reiterate my point was that from what I've seen "Linux zealots" in general seem to be far more derogatory towards "MS-Fanboys" than the other way around, and in my mind insulting people's intelligence is not the best way of winning an argument.

  25. And now for the gaming version..! by STDOUBT · · Score: 4, Interesting
    http://juegalinex.linex.org/

    Here you can find the "home-user" version.
    And here (PDF Warning!!),
    https://www.linux-magazine.com/issue/64/Linux_Maga zine_DVD.pdf
    you can read an English language article describing this special
    home version called JuegaLinex (Play LinEx).

    It gives an option at install-time to d/l nvidia or ati 3D drivers.
    I put this on a 800mHz mini-itx box for my niece and nephew--
    They loved it!
    (You can easily localize this version to English)
    Many educational apps and a ridiculous number of games!
    I recommend to try it on any small people you may know.

    1. Re:And now for the gaming version..! by waferhead · · Score: 1

      OK, I still don't quite get the "PDF Warning" BS...

      It's an OPEN format, and wonderfully supoported under Linux, as U*ix is not dependent on the horrid Acrobat reader etc from Adobe.

      PDFs display almost instantly, print perfectly, generated by OpenOffice etc etc...

      Is it just because I ONLY use Linux at home I don't hate PDFs?

    2. Re:And now for the gaming version..! by Burning+Plastic · · Score: 1

      Trying to work out if this was a troll, but pdf warning after a link just makes sure that people know that they are about to open/download a pdf rather than going to another web page...

      --
      [All Your Fish Are Belong To Us]
    3. Re:And now for the gaming version..! by genooma · · Score: 1

      Some people's browsers hang with PDFs, even when you set them to NOT open it with the plug-in. Don't ask me why tougth.

    4. Re:And now for the gaming version..! by waferhead · · Score: 1

      Wasn't intended as a troll, I mistook the comment to be another PDF bash, which is pretty common for reasons I cannot comprehend at all (as I said)

  26. For those that don't know.... by Maelwryth · · Score: 2, Funny

    gnuLinEx is spanish for GNU Linux.

    --
    I reserve the write to mangle english.
  27. PDF is _not_ open standard -- it is proprietary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    PDF is not an open standard like ODF. Adobe, a private, for profit company owns and devlops the PDF IP. It is almost ubiquitous however it cannot be claimed to be an 'open standard'. It amazes me that in this audience that no one else has picked up on this!! Come on people!

  28. Far Hard by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Extremadura is the region of Spain from which most of Spain's global conquerors launched, starting a half-millennium ago. While that "pioneer" legacy does make it natural to lead in the brave new world of OSS, it's worth considering that its primary legacy from its past colonial leadership is extreme poverty.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Far Hard by expressionist · · Score: 1

      Well, it is not 'extremely poor'. Data from the cia factbook: Spain: GDP - per capita (PPP): $25,500 Extremadura, being the poorest region in the country, should be around 70% of that number.

    2. Re:Far Hard by metamatic · · Score: 1

      It's not just adura, it's Extremadura! And it doesn't get much more extreme than running Linux.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    3. Re:Far Hard by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately for that theory, there were lots of other Spanish and other European areas at least as poor as Extremadura. But none of them produced the number of conquerors as Extremadura. And those conquerors brought back unprecedented wealth to Extremadura, and all of Spain. It's mostly gone now.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    4. Re:Far Hard by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I cited the Wikipedia for its poverty status. "Poorest in Spain" is an extreme, in any case. But where do you get your "70%" figure?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    5. Re:Far Hard by expressionist · · Score: 1

      I quoted it from memory. Now I have done some actual research: http://portal.aragob.es/pls/portal30/docs/FOLDER/I AEST/IAEST_0000/IAEST_01/IAEST_0105/IAEST_010500/C RE.PDF (page 2, down-right, in spanish): 67,4% And from this article, also in spanish: http://www.elpais.es/articulo/economia/Madrid/fue/ comunidad/crecio/2005/seguida/Extremadura/Murcia/e lpporeco/20060419elpepueco_4/Tes/ Extremadura: 14.051 euros, Spain: 20.838 euros (67,43%)

  29. Re:Good now they don't have an excuse to pirate by by davaguco · · Score: 5, Informative

    Spain is not third world, by any account or figure.

    --
    Please google and research "peak oil" a bit. You will discover this crisis is a lot worse than they have told you
  30. But is it any more pronounceable in Spanish? by fantomas · · Score: 1

    So how the heck do you pronounce "gnuLinEx" in Spanish? :-) that looks like a string of characters that's going to be hard for some people to remember surely.. probably I am being trite but I think one of the smartest things those nice browser people did was call their browser "Firefox", not some uberclever mashup of acronyms, just a friendly name. Surely there's some friendly localised name that could be used, will the school teachers and govt officials in this part of Spain really give a damn if their OS is based on GNU and Linux. I'd say the Spanish geeks should think of a friendlier name. Good on you though for what you've done getting the OS established though, good luck one and all!

  31. Re:Yeah right by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

    18Mln vs. 190k euros? I'd say it doesn't hurt to try.

    From my personal experience, 5 years ago Linux had problem of application availability and the quality of the applications. Now, most problems boil down to "Wind0ze does it differently". IOW, If you deploy Linux-only environment such problems don't exist.

    I once worked for three years in Linux-only house. After 4 years on WinNT4. That was best experience of my life: easy installation and recovery, painless networking, simple backup, no-brainer collaboration with others, etc. Perl, python, apache/php/mysql, cvs, gcc, gdb, vim, etc - all stuff already installed for your there. And it all works! All servers are only click away. But of course the experience depends on kind of work you are doing. I'm software developer and Linux known to be developers' "nirvana".

    --
    All hope abandon ye who enter here.
  32. Fascinating... by XanC · · Score: 1

    So are the San Diego Padres supposed to represent Catholic priests, parents in general, or fathers? Which of these makes the best (well, least bad) mascot?

    1. Re:Fascinating... by Don_dumb · · Score: 1

      Well, an outside knowledge of US sports naming conventions (and our British sports teams that decide to follow suit) tells me that they probably dont mean or even represent anything. But in fact the 'sportscyclopeadia' http://www.sportsecyclopedia.com/nl/sdpadres/padre s.html
      states that the San Diego team is "Named for the Padres (Spanish for Priest) of the Roman Catholic Mission San Diego de Alcala, which was founded in San Diego in the 1700's."
      So I hereby retract my snide and faceious remark that began this comment.

      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
  33. Re:Good now they don't have an excuse to pirate by by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Even though it's clearly an ignorant troll, he's not completely off. Spain has a LOT of blood on its hands. First the moslems, then all of south and central america. We're talking millions and millions! And then "recently" the civil war and the fascistic dictatorship until 1974.

    However - They've learned their lesson - that war does no good! And is now very peace-loving people. Passionate, but peace-loving. It was simply amazing to see how people went on the street after the Madrid-bombings to demonstrate for PEACE - the day after they had been victim to a large-scale terror attack. Their response was not to start wars. They had learned the lesson.

    Other countries and people could learn from that......

    Disclaimer: Yes, I live in Spain.

  34. 99% Off! by bobpopo · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The government has estimated that the total cost of this project was about 190,000 euros (£130,000), 18 million euros lower than if the schools had purchased Microsoft software.
    Just to make it really clear: 190,000/18,000,000 = 0.01 So this price is 1% of the original price. A 99% saving. You don't see that kind of deal often!
  35. The original document and translation to English by jorgegv · · Score: 1

    Here is the original document from the Junta de Extremadura:

    http://www.linex.org/mocion_consejo_gobierno.pdf

    And here is a free translation of that document:

    http://www.hispalinux.es/files/mocion_consejo_gobi erno_english.pdf

    --
    Reality is a mass hallucination due to lack of alcohol in blood. - DeadLiver
  36. Re:190,000Euro divided by 70,400 computers..... by kanweg · · Score: 1

    But then, all the people who installed it will know better how to handle it in case of a problem and may not need to run to IT staff to solve little problems.

    Bert

  37. Re:190,000Euro divided by 70,400 computers..... by bky1701 · · Score: 1

    Why hack the grades when you control them. :P

  38. I don't think so by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    Dear pope,
    Someone on /. told me your now open source so please could you open up the valuts of the vatican so that I can run scientific test on all the relics and books you hold their.

    Thanks,
    Judus.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:I don't think so by the_womble · · Score: 1
      All the documents you need to be a Christian are freely available.

      Just like the source code you need to compile a OSS software.

      The Vatican vaults are largely already open even to the public. More are open to scholars.

      You should also not pay too much attention to conspiracy theories: most museums and major libraries have stuff that is not readily accessible or on display so it is hardly surprising the Vatican does too.

      The Vatican also has a bit of a problem with things like pornography with historical value: it can not display it, it can not sell it and it has an obligation to preserve it.

      I can run scientific test on all the relics and books you hold

      What do they have that you are so desperate to run tests on? Examples please.

  39. You are coaching it wrong by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Try this instead. Once you can lower a cost, then change it to imcreasing their revenue. Than all that is left, is to overcome the money factor. If the gov. is attached to gates front pocket (or there abouts), then it is difficult to get their backing. But not all are that way.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  40. Open Standard versus Free by RahoulB · · Score: 3, Informative

    Adobe has a few patents on it but anyone is allowed to use the PDF standard royalty-free. so it is an open standard (although not free)

    1. Re:Open Standard versus Free by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And said patents do not (and never will) apply in Spain, where there is no such thing as software patents, no such thing as conspiracy, five years for drug dealing would be considered a cruel and unusual punishment and shoplifting is legal if you are hungry. Even if Spain legalised software patents, any Open Source PDF generator could be cited as Prior Art to block Adobe's application for them {any existing, falsely-granted patents would not just become valid, since that would constitute retroactive application of a new law ..... which is also illegal in Spain.}

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  41. Re:No, no... the GP post was alluding to: by sharkey · · Score: 1

    You mean the Spanish GNU/Inquisition, of course.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  42. Re:From Spain by Justin205 · · Score: 1

    I am learning Spanish and this can confuse as naturally I assume that someone is talking about their brothers, when they could also mean their sisters as well.

    Just remember that if they're talking only about their sisters, they'll use the feminine word. Masculine word = male only or mix of male and female. Feminine word = female only. (This obviously only applies to people or other things with genders, and not to such things as fruit, furniture, or anything else lacking a concrete gender. ;)

    --
    "Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you."
  43. Re:From Spain by Don_dumb · · Score: 1

    Yes I was aware of this, but didn't want to go too in depth. Thanks for pointing that out more concisely than I could have.

    --
    If this were really happening, what would you think?
  44. Re:Good double-PLUS good... by Zelbinian · · Score: 1

    This has nothing to do with your post, except for the fact that I was tickled pink by your use of Battlestar Galatica termonology ('fracking'). That is all. Move along.

    --
    Putting the 33k in G33k.
  45. Re:Good now they don't have an excuse to pirate by by Tim+C · · Score: 1

    Spain has a LOT of blood on its hands.

    Name one developed (or even semi-developed) country that doesn't.

  46. I don't want my religion outsourced! by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Think about the US jobs that will be lost.

    We are doomed, I am telling you, Mc Donalds, flipping burgers, blah, blah, blah.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  47. Re:Good now they don't have an excuse to pirate by by ttys00 · · Score: 1

    Spain has the world's 9th largest economy when measuring by nominal GDP. I've toured the whole country apart from the north-west corner, and in no way is it a third world country. You've got no idea what you're talking about.

  48. Re:Good now they don't have an excuse to pirate by by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    Switzerland?

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  49. Priests. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    I have seen logos and the like of the team and that is the context.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  50. A player can't dive for penalty .... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    ... if you are actually not defending your area (bunch of sissies) hopping to go to extra time. A famous Mexican soccer comentator used to say "The football is very lazy, it always choses to rest in the net that is closest to it"...

    But now that you guys know that, you can apply this knowledge next time there is a WC in Germany.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  51. Installing printer under Ubuntu is faster than XP by Secrity · · Score: 1

    I just installed Ubuntu on a machine at home. The printer (HP LaserJet 1020) install on the Ubuntu box was much easier and took a fraction of the time than it did when I installed the same printer on an XP box. The printer was originally bought for use with an XP box and I didn't check for Linux compatibility before I installed it on the Ubuntu box. CUPS comes preinstalled and running on Ubuntu. The printer install wizard makes installing a printer with CUPS a very fast and easy point and click process. I noticed that Ubuntu also has a package available specifically for use with HP printers, I didn't try it because the already installed CUPS works fine.

    I have installed printers on FreeBSD, other Linix, and Solaris boxes in the past and know what a pain in the ass it is. I was truly amazed when after just a few mouse clicks the wizard said that it was sending a test page to the printer, I heard the printer start up, and then a perfect CUPS test page emerged from the printer.

  52. Funny math by LaughingCoder · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who kind of wonders about these cost estimates? First, to update 70,000 machines for 190,000 Euros means 3 Euros/machine. Does this include labor? Second, $18,000,000 divided by 70,000 is $257 per machine. Those are some expensive office licenses they have there (I presume those 70,000 machines already have Windows so they shouldn't have to re-buy those licenses). Isn't there some sort of middle ground that would be just as cheap, like using Open Office on Windows - this would sidestep all the compatibility issues with printers and such while reaping most of the cost benefits? While I don't doubt there could be significant savings, at least in the initial project costs, it looks to me like these estimates are way off-base.

    --
    The more you regulate a company, the worse its products become.
    1. Re:Funny math by mshurpik · · Score: 1

      Well that's good. Do you have time to go back and check whether the install completed, or are you just blindly running through the building? Who sets up the accounts? Are there enough machines in each building so that your drive-time doesn't eat into your profits?

      Just curious. $130,000 is a good salary for a sysadmin, especially freelance, not hard to imagine at all. With a five-day workweek, that's 270 machines per day, or 34 per hour. Whew!

    2. Re:Funny math by mshurpik · · Score: 1

      >Slash your number 5 times down and I would still happily pick this job up. If you doubt it, check some salary numbers for Spain:

      Damn. Since you claim to do this work, I'll take your word for it. I could almost see doing this for $3/machine in the US (if it only takes 5 minutes per machine) but driving between sites, I'd get killed on gas money.

  53. Re:Good now they don't have an excuse to pirate by by James+McGuigan · · Score: 1

    Iceland

  54. Re:Good now they don't have an excuse to pirate by by DarkDragonVKQ · · Score: 1

    They have an interesting history. While they don't have blood on their hands they have black marks from the way they dealt with the entire situation of WWII and all.. (Wikipedia has information about it).

    --
    "I thought what I'd do was I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes" ~ Laughing Man - GITS:SAC
  55. Re:Good now they don't have an excuse to pirate by by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

    Ireland.

    --
    When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
  56. open source by paughsw · · Score: 1

    open source is the future

  57. Spanish genders by mangu · · Score: 1
    not to such things as fruit, furniture, or anything else lacking a concrete gender


    *Everything* in spanish has a gender. Fruit is feminine, "la fruta", furniture is masculine, "los muebles". If you mix both in a sentence, you use the masculine: "estas frutas y estos muebles son buenos".

  58. Re:Squeak and old news? by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

    Reading article before commenting is useful sometimes. It's precisely about municipality move to Linux - after successful pilot in education.

    --
    All hope abandon ye who enter here.
  59. Oh, Thank God..... by GigG · · Score: 1

    I welcome our Extremaduraian Overlords.

    --
    Is buying a Harley Davidson as your first motorcycle since you were 16 at age 49 a midlife crisis issue?
  60. By 1 account by Uukrul · · Score: 1

    Spain is not third world, by any account or figure.

    Although economic performance is very good and it's one of the most growing economies of Europe (so medicine, technological consumption, style of life, etc. is very similar to other developed countries...) there is a lot of municipal corruption. Corruption is as usual in Spanish councils as in third world countries: Marbella it's only the most known corruption case. Spain it's not comparable to northern countries.

    Disclaimer: Yes, I live in Spain.

    --
    My city: Barcelona.
  61. Re:Good now they don't have an excuse to pirate by by Smurf · · Score: 1

    While I totally agree with you in that Spain is in no way a third world country, I don't think nominal GDP is a good measure of development, at least as exposed by your link. For example, according to that measure Brazil, India, and Mexico would be more developed than Netherlands, Switzerland, and Sweden. Somehow that seems incorrect.

  62. spanish gnuLinEx user by genuin · · Score: 1

    I'm reading slashdot from a gnuLinEx computer in a public library right now. As somebody has told, it is a localised debian with funny names for the most used programs, taken from emblematic animals/monuments/people from Extremadura. In example, Zurbaran (the Gimp) was a famous painter, and Brasero (k3b) is a traditional coal stove. The government of Extremadura has also made a serious effort to bring broadband internet access to rural areas, were most of the people live. Now, all public libraries and schools in Extremadura have computers with gnuLinEx and broadband, and kids no longer use Windows at school.

  63. Re:Good now they don't have an excuse to pirate by by ddddan · · Score: 1

    This is a troll, right??

  64. Re:Good now they don't have an excuse to pirate by by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

    We were the invaded, not the invaders.

    --
    When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
  65. Simple bad math by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 1
    Do you think that you if you buy Windows for 70.000 PCs the cost is 70000*retail prize of windows? Of course not, you call the Microsoft Iberica and get a deal. I'm noy saying that it would be less than 198.000, but I'm not saying either that the man who issued the report has included also the money spent in training the users and tech support for the change. Not that I want to start the TCO controversy, buy I just want to put things in perspective.

    Also, another considerations when looking at the report:

    This is a electoral year in many regions in Spain (maybe the politicians are a little prone to exagerate what they have done??).

    Even if it is not an electoral issue, think of this scenario: The head of the department wants to write the report and asks to "the who really knows" the numbers. He says something like "well, the development has been 100.000 and installing will be 98.000, and then the others expenses in formation that we cannot calculate well. In the Windows side, if we had bought 70.000 licenses without OEM, discounts or deals, it would have been 20.000.000, but if we had negotiated a deal it could have been for 2.000.000". Then the head of the department compares the best scenario of Linux against the worst scenario of Windows, to boost to his chiefs that he had got savings for 19.800.000, instead of 1.800.000 or less.

    --
    Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
    1. Re:Simple bad math by orzetto · · Score: 1
      Do you think that you if you buy Windows for 70.000 PCs the cost is 70000*retail prize of windows? Of course not, you call the Microsoft Iberica and get a deal.

      I suppose that the region of Extremadura already does that, as any organisation of their size. The 18-million-euro figure is theirs, I suppose they do keep their bills, especially when they are this size.

      [...] the man who issued the report [may not have] included also the money spent in training the users and tech support for the change.

      They say "total cost", and other than installation (possibly very cheap for networked machines) and retraining there are no other costs in switching to Linux. They also use their own Debian-based distro, so they can tailor it to their own needs.

      For the rest you assume ignorance or malice, presenting no factual numbers. I do not think you can seriously get 90% volume discount on Windows, that would be outrageous.

      --
      Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
    2. Re:Simple bad math by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 1

      Ok, numbers you want...

      One retail WinXP (PRO!) licence (at microsoft.com, 300$) x 70.000 PCs = 21.000.000 $ (probably the 18.000.000)


      BUT:

      Buying OEM is cheaper than retail.
      You probably don't need to switch all your OS (the W2000 works still fine).
      Working at the public administration in Spain, I have been offered a 25%off just for buying 5 licences.

      I think that it will be easy, when buying 70.000 licences, to improve a little the deal. Of course, as this project has been working for a couple years, Microsoft had to be beaten because any other result (justified or not) would mean that someone had to say that he was wrong... So, the better the numbers, the more "justified" the solution already accepted was.

      Of course, zealots might prefer to believe a politic in an electoral year and think that anyone who just tells people to think a little about it is "malicious"... that's the main advantage of being a zealot, it makes easy to do not need to think a lot about things...

      BTW, if you work for the Spanish Administration maybe you can tell me how things run at your workplace, I that do I tell you how things run at my workplace....

      --
      Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
  66. Good for them to save their pennies then. by twitter · · Score: 1

    ... primary legacy from its past colonial leadership is extreme poverty.

    Yeah, war is not a good thing to base your economy on.

    Old bones aside, it's good for anyone to avoid the M$ tax. $20,000,000 is money every school district has better uses for than software from a company that's as likely to sue them as give them anything useful.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Good for them to save their pennies then. by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      War probably is bad to base one's economy on: live by the sword, die by the sword.

      Spain's economy was ruined by victory, failing to grow any other wealth than that stolen from its colonies. There's more to learn from Spain's decline than just the dangers of war. There's also the danger of getting what you wish for.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  67. Re:Good double-PLUS good... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    I could be mistaken, but I don't think so.

    Plus, when I ever have to Ctrl+Alt+Del my KDE session (more than once a month) it DOES restore, but to the last KNOWN GOOD session. Any work saved is fine, most icons recently added to the desktop are fine, but any work open does NOT get intercepted and saved. At least not like WP and LWP do when windoze 98 crapped/craps out on me.

    (On that note, WordPro and 1-2-3 in Lotus SmartSuite in win98 inside of Win4Lin STILL starts up 5x faster than Ooo.2 or lower. I have only 256 MB RAM, and while my system thrashes like hell, SmartSuite is (albeit on an older code and on a smaller footprint) is like lightning compared to the OOO Cessna. Too bad I cannot make it to the Linux Expo this year to show off what I can do in SmartSuite that I cannot do in OOO. At SOME point, I'll release my stuff under dual-licensing... less-featuredfree/open; heavily-featured for charge. Not sure if I'll "ask IBM" or if I'll approach Google. But, it'll be interesting to see what becomes of it.)

    Um, this is what I mean. Here's a scenario:

    User puts in ticket which requires a tech to log in. But, user is called to a meeting, or forgets to log out.

    Typically, in windoze, trying to log of the logged on user generates a warning that all open work will be lost.

    Torn, and depending on IT policy, some tech blow the work out, while some leave a note saying, sorry, we didn't want to risk blowing away your possibly-present work. As a courtesy, I REALLY hate assuming it's OK to boot them off unless they say "Go ahead even if I'm gone."

    Now, what I would figure is that mshaft would have experienced a bazillion requests for such a feature. Only, the deprioritize it or suppress it so it never makes the cut. It seems so simple. A batch file notices the work is not saved, similar to when a user tries to close an app without first saving new or modified files. The user is prompted. I don't think I've seen this available in Linux, either, KDE, for certain. Now, the batch file could collect the app process info, name, and save-as a new version of the file. Any apps open would get similar treatment. The tech need not even know the contents of the work, just see a prompt that asks "Do you wish to abort the processes and not make any saves-as,or do you wish the elegant/courtesy boot-off with save-as steps?"Then, then the tech could respond and help IT look good when users tend to forget to log off. It also is good for cases when family or other members forget their passwords and no admin is around to force the log-off. Even if a normal attempt by a regular users generates a warning message, the save-as-for-new-logon process could spare people of grief.

    I am sure there must be hundreds of thousands of regretted boot-offs a day, maybe a week.

    As for the file system, it is just horrendous that, just today, I did a FRESH XP install on an NTFS partition, blown out and rewritten. With ONLY XP and orifice 2k3 and a FEW small apps, the filesystem was frackin' fragged as hell. Red vertical lines in Diskkeeper. The install was barely 20 minutes old. This is just HIDEOUS. I am sure Linux had better file contiguousness years ago. SO for 2K and XP it must not have even been possible for ms or they weren't willing to come up with a filesystem upgrade for existing or fresh installations.

    So much for innovation. Seems more like enervation.

    Now, I gotta gets some frackin' BSG DVD rerun time in. I wanna see Number 6 tell the newborn it won't have to worry about life problems, and see the blood-curdling screaming mother. And, I wanna seek Starbuck sock the shit out the drunkard XO.

    And, the next time somebody at work sneezes, I am going to have to fight HARD not to say, "Lords of Kobol protect his/hear circulatory system."

    --------
    --------

    heheh this is just TOO funny.. when I posted my prev spiel, the image word was "incite"

    Now, it is "sequel"... slash's tool is so funny often.

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  68. more information in Hispalinux site by TioRober · · Score: 1

    The item press http://www.hispalinux.es/node/597

    the law aproved http://www.hispalinux.es/files/mocion_consejo_gobi erno_english.pdf

    article in newspaper http://socios.hispalinux.es/node/10258

    Congratulation Extremadura people :)

    --
    Ñu !!