Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot's Vastu

nanopolitan writes "Wired has a story on harmonious website design according to Vastu, 'the Indian counterpart of feng shui'. The graphic accompanying the story has an analysis of Slashdot's design by Dr. Smita Narang. Her verdict? This site is 'in desperate need of balance'." From the article: "Thirty-year-old Smita Narang is rapidly becoming one of India's hottest Web designers. Her method: applying vastu shastra, the Indian counterpart of feng shui, to the online realm. The process entails mapping page attributes - HTML, colors, graphics - to elements like fire, water, and air. 'Any disturbance of these established elements can cause an imbalance in the site that directly affects its business,' Narang says."

386 comments

  1. Shouldn't there be a foot icon? by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 1

    I thought it's funny and laughed.

    1. Re:Shouldn't there be a foot icon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What if they start applying this people's faces? Will Smita Narang rearrange her face for balance? Looks like some 30 year old desperate housewife wanting some money on the side.

    2. Re:Shouldn't there be a foot icon? by Digital+Avatar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I thought it was obnoxious and just goes to further the promotion of bullshit pseudoscience. You know, vastu shastra, like feng shui, is really nothing more than prescientific observations on how to situate a building so it doesn't get flooded, have dirt blown in by prevailing winds, etc (hence the 'feng' and 'shui' in feng shui). It makes this article all the more comical. Thankfully, everyone knows it's bullshit, so no one's listening to this jerk, right? ...Right? RIGHT?

    3. Re:Shouldn't there be a foot icon? by LilGuy · · Score: 1

      Right. What does it matter if someone does? One less non-nerd on slashdot ;)

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
    4. Re:Shouldn't there be a foot icon? by Jamalu · · Score: 1

      It is also ludicrous that she thinks that anybody who wants the book outside India should pay four times the price in India.

    5. Re:Shouldn't there be a foot icon? by Fishbulb · · Score: 1

      Thankfully, everyone knows it's bullshit, so no one's listening to this jerk, right? ...Right? RIGHT?

      Lighten up, Francis.

    6. Re:Shouldn't there be a foot icon? by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 1

      It's so sad that I actually get that. *hangs head in shame*

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    7. Re:Shouldn't there be a foot icon? by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, there's this thing that most nerds are really bad at. Even - perhaps especially - when they think they're being good at it (e.g., "skins".) It's called aesthetics.

      Feng shui and vastu and the like are, at least partially, non-western models for something that could generally be called aesthetic experience. There are also western models for aesthetics. One could even concieve of usability research as a kind of scientification of a subset of aesthetics.

    8. Re:Shouldn't there be a foot icon? by Digital+Avatar · · Score: 1

      No. They're not. They've never had ANYTHING to do with aesthetics. That's part of the bullshit that surrounds Feng Shui. They don't call it wind & water for nothing.

    9. Re:Shouldn't there be a foot icon? by eraserewind · · Score: 1

      In fairness, skin technologies are a developer's acknowledgment that "we don't know how to make it look good, do it yourself if you think that's important".

  2. Standards! by headkase · · Score: 5, Funny

    If he encourages the use of the blink tag I vote we brand him a heretic and burn him at the stake.
    I'm not kidding.

    --
    Shh.
    1. Re:Standards! by cptgrudge · · Score: 5, Funny

      I know "this thread is useless without pics" is a Slashdot faux pas, but calling this chick a dude is pretty harsh.

      --
      Qualitas edurus commercium, nullus penitus net rimor, nullus deus beneficium
    2. Re:Standards! by Vulcann · · Score: 1

      If he encourages the use of the blink tag I vote we brand him a heretic and burn him at the stake.

      Umm ... "Smita" is a she :).

      No one has to believe in what she says. Its just a point of view. I'm not saying I support her viewpoint, but I'm not saying she should be punished for having an opinion either. This is a democracy isn't it ? :D

    3. Re:Standards! by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Nope, it's not.

      If you bust in the door of a McDonalds and start saying "Put that table there, and that chair should be glued to the wall.." you're going to be asked to leave.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    4. Re:Standards! by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      It sounds like the sort of thing you could easily do with a variant of Alterslash.

    5. Re:Standards! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aha, so she is a Witch.
      And what do we do with witches?

    6. Re:Standards! by bluebox_rob · · Score: 1

      That's hardly a fair analogy - people ask for her advice, she's not busting in anywhere from what I can see.

    7. Re:Standards! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, what's worse?

      a) 15 year old kids making their first webpage which you'll never look at using a blink tag,
      b) Really pretty webpages that you DO have to look at, but that get the entire screen taken over by really pretty flash adverts.

      The blink tag is a harmless toy. If you want a heretic, find the guy that came up with content obscuring flash adverts.

    8. Re:Standards! by kjart · · Score: 1

      If you bust in the door of a McDonalds and start saying "Put that table there, and that chair should be glued to the wall.." you're going to be asked to leave.

      So she's broken into Slashdot, has she? I wasn't aware that Slashdot ran on Windows Server.

    9. Re:Standards! by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Did slashdot ask for her to review the site, or did she just up and review it for us, because it's so hugely popular, even though, without even knowing what Vastu is, I can tell you that it isn't the best designed site out there. Here's a question, what does the perfect site look like according to Vastu?

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    10. Re:Standards! by bluebox_rob · · Score: 1

      I think those rascals over at wired.com got her to review it for us (notice they didn't want her opinion on their own site!). As for the perfect Vastu site, I would guess something like this.

    11. Re:Standards! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hope not. Its hideous...

    12. Re:Standards! by Andrew+Kismet · · Score: 1

      FTS: We all know that the five elements that comprise the human and the world are called the "Paanchbhootas".

      Of course we do.

    13. Re:Standards! by HoosierPeschke · · Score: 2, Funny

      5 elements? Milla Jovovich is prett hot but that was just a movie.

      --
      Mr. Universe: "They can't stop the signal, Mal. They can never stop the signal."
    14. Re:Standards! by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Well, if I have to be complete... I wouldn't mind getting myself a little bit of the fifth element.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    15. Re:Standards! by telarus · · Score: 1

      ++For the websites to bring business the element in each quadrant must be honored and they should be kept in balance as this creates powerful and beneficial conditions, which draw business towards the owner. On the other hand, an imbalance of the elements can create negative energies, which may have an adverse effect on the websites.++ Buahahahahahahahahahahahhhhahhh!

    16. Re:Standards! by dugjohnson · · Score: 1
      There are 5 elements and 9 planets.....
      The five elements Out of the nine planets, our planet has life because of the presence of these five elements. The world comprises of five basic elements, also known as the Paanchbhootas. They are Earth, Water, Air, Fire and Space. Earth and Water have limited and localised availability for the human habitat and growth.

      I wonder if one of the five elements will be downgraded now that Pluto is no longer a planet. It seems to me that that last one, Space, is kinda tacked on there. A lot of other cultures only recognize the first four. I mean, the other four kind of define Space doncha think? A little revision in the Paanchbhootas may be in order here.

      --
      My brain is overly lubricated
    17. Re:Standards! by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      You say that now, but wait until the next day when you wake up, not knowing who you are and there are zombies everywhere.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    18. Re:Standards! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      But I bet if you put her on your web site it will increase traffic.

    19. Re:Standards! by Andrew+Kismet · · Score: 1

      I dunno, even the Greeks had the classical 4 elements, but tacked up "Ether" to account for the Sun, the Moon, and life.

  3. feng shui is a myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and this analogue is bs too

  4. And like feng shui, IT'S BULLSHIT! by Chas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously, all crap like this is, is a way to justify stupid expenditures based on some self-riteous asshole's personal opinions.

    Only people with double-digit IQ or a severe case of money poisoning actually listen to these jackasses.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:And like feng shui, IT'S BULLSHIT! by terriblecertainty · · Score: 1

      There's a sucker born every minute, I guess. Example from the "article":

      The horizontally enlongated layout gives the site to much Air, causing instability.

      Shut it, dirty hippy. I think I'm getting a bit stabby.

    2. Re:And like feng shui, IT'S BULLSHIT! by cptgrudge · · Score: 1

      Me an' me bro...uh...Cletus went thar' an' won that thar' lottury.

      Momma, she says, "Boys, you best git on' them thar' web saytes up an' stuff."

      So, I'd a' like to...uh...su..sub..subsc...git that thar' newslittur your have.

      --
      Qualitas edurus commercium, nullus penitus net rimor, nullus deus beneficium
    3. Re:And like feng shui, IT'S BULLSHIT! by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 1

      Same goes for believing in Santa, only this is targeted to an older audience. I'd call it bullshit too, yet I do not wish to offend harmless and innocent bullshit.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
    4. Re:And like feng shui, IT'S BULLSHIT! by blu3+b0y · · Score: 2, Insightful
      How can attention to good composition be bullshit?

      Will putting a water fountain in a "harsh corner" improve your finances? Of course not, not in a direct causitive way.

      Does living in a shithole make you less motivated and less likely to attract friends and influential people to help you make money? Fuckin A right it does.

      So, does paying attention to your surroundings and having a well-put together harmonious environment overall improve your life? How could it not?

      Only people with a double-digit IQ believe that the world is Manichean and things are only completely useful or completely worthless...

    5. Re:And like feng shui, IT'S BULLSHIT! by Chas · · Score: 1

      "How can attention to good composition be bullshit?"

      Attention to good composition isn't bullshit. It's a variable with millions of opinions on "correctness".

      This isn't even that. We start talking about "aligning with fire and earth....", you get the idea.

      But if they left the pseudomystical psychobabble out, it'd just be another boring talk about good composition. But NOOO! It's VASTU!

      *Waves hands, wiggles fingers, and pops eyes out*

      OOOOOOOH!

      Spare me...

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    6. Re:And like feng shui, IT'S BULLSHIT! by deathshadow60 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ANYONE who does web coding should see right through this bullshit - a simple examination of the jokers website http://www.webvastu.com/ Should send up warning signs to ANY but the greenest of nubes. The 'three piece' image (WHY the hell do people do this?!?) isn't compatable with Opera or Safari... the three 'section boxes' to the right of the image have some of the ugliest formatting I've seen (It's called side padding - use it! At the same time cut back on the top/bottom, that looks like crap)... The site renders as a crappy little stripe justified left (Much like wired, it's not bad enough having a shitbox amatuer fixed width layout, but for crying out loud center the damned thing)... fixed px sized fonts that are too small to be useful to 'large font' users... (anything LESS than 12px needs a brick upside the head, and I'm hesitant to go below 'EGA fonts' - 14px) and the validator chokes on the doctype... Seriously whiskey tango foxtrot is this nonsense: Wow, I wish I'd thought of finding some whack-job eastern art form to use as justification for a lack of knowing how to design a website... My BULLSHIT alarm hasn't gone off this hardcore since I first heard of "Web 2.0" ... and much like Web 2.0, Penn and Teller could easily devote 30 minutes to this one.

      --
      I went looking for trouble, and boy, I found her...
    7. Re:And like feng shui, IT'S BULLSHIT! by blu3+b0y · · Score: 1

      Good composition is in fact a well-studied field with thousands of years of refinement. Let us not forget the golden ratio and the golden mean. There are lots of variables, but I would opine that there are certain constants most reasonable people can agree on.

      If someone chooses to use words like "balancing fire and earth" to create a system of rules, then if those rules are a useful way to proceed towards something with good composition, what's the harm?

      It seems to me you don't have any idea if this is a beneficial practice or not, you simply reject it out of hand because the reasons given for why it works aren't rational. Big fucking deal, things can work even if the people who practice them don't have any idea why they work.

      I would say that jumping on the Vastu bandwagon because of mystical beliefs is not rationally defensible, but leaping to conclusions that it CANNOT work because their rationale is not rational is also not defensible.

      I am not saying that Vastu is a good thing, or even a useful thing, but you have no idea either. You simply reject it because the rules are not derived from the first principles of logic.

      Try living in a world with the potential for things to work even when not driven by logic. Humans are not primarly logical beasts, so it makes sense that at least some of our practices should not be founded exclusively on logic.

      I'm not saying you have to use Vastu to design your sites, but your implicit assumption that anyone who does is an idiot is remarkably unimaginable. There are more paths to truth than your Western devotion to individualistic rationalism. Descartes was not the end of the discussion on human thought.

    8. Re:And like feng shui, IT'S BULLSHIT! by name*censored* · · Score: 1
      Only people with double-digit IQ
      Fortunately for you, yours is a single digit so there's no problems

      PS. Don't bother posting "Single digit IQ not possible blah blah blah" because I am joking :)
      --
      Commodore64_love: I don't comprehend people who're so frightened of death that they'll bankrupt themselves to stay alive
    9. Re:And like feng shui, IT'S BULLSHIT! by blu3+b0y · · Score: 1

      Upon review of the site and their design recommendations, it's clear that Vastu is the product of a mildly retarded gopher.

      However, I maintain that the spectacular failure of Vastu is not inherently due to its being based on ideas not wholly rational.

      The failure of Vastu is due to a total lack of good taste.

    10. Re:And like feng shui, IT'S BULLSHIT! by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      Seriously, all crap like this is, is a way to justify stupid expenditures based on some self-riteous asshole's personal opinions.

      Only people with double-digit IQ or a severe case of money poisoning actually listen to these jackasses.


      I vote this post "Irony of 2006". You rant for people who fall for easy scams based on personal opinion, and then refer to people's "IQ", otherwise known as "someone's totally subjective opinion of how intelligence should be measured".

      Really, a huge bunch of those suckers paying for BS, you're talking about, are MENSA members, paying rightfully their membership fees so they can remain intelligent.

      Ponder that.
    11. Re:And like feng shui, IT'S BULLSHIT! by Megane · · Score: 1

      You forgot the obligatory link.

      P&T did a show on Feng Shui in which no two of the three "experts" came up with the same answers about how to arrange the furniture. There's only one place Feng Shui works, and that's in Nintendo's Animal Crossing game.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    12. Re:And like feng shui, IT'S BULLSHIT! by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

      Minus all the superstition and religiosity, vaastu is actually a rather interesting art-form; it's basically architectural code handed down across generations. Most traditional houses are based on vaastu. I personally, couldn't care less about vaastu, my parent's house, for example, has a complete and absolute disregard for vaastu principles, but as a traditional art-form, I respect the fact that it's been there for so long.

      That said, vaastu for the web? Puhleeeze; it's almost like designing websites based on, I don't know, Greco-Roman architecture or something. Clearly, someone's found out that there's no standards-issuing body for vaastu, and has decided to moneytize the brand for herself.

    13. Re:And like feng shui, IT'S BULLSHIT! by PygmySurfer · · Score: 1

      Sorry

      We at Showtime Online express our apologies; however, these pages are intended for access only from within the United States.

    14. Re:And like feng shui, IT'S BULLSHIT! by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      I vote this post "Irony of 2006". You rant for people who fall for easy scams based on personal opinion, and then refer to people's "IQ", otherwise known as "someone's totally subjective opinion of how intelligence should be measured".
      You're stretching. "Double digit IQ" or "room temperature IQ" are simply euphemisms for "idiot". You'd be correct if he was referring to (say) how tested IQ scores are clearly lower in those who espouse feng shui, but in fact he's just using it to mean "sub-average intelligence".
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    15. Re:And like feng shui, IT'S BULLSHIT! by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      P&T did a show on Feng Shui in which no two of the three "experts" came up with the same answers about how to arrange the furniture.
      Cripes. I love P&T:Bullshit, but this one I thought was kinda silly. While there are a few nuts who take this crap literally, feng shui is little more than a theory of interior design (with a dash of architectural design). Just as there are infinite ways to decorate a house in an 18th century colonial style, there are infinite ways to arrange the furniture to be "feng shui compliant". They demonstrated that feng shui is not a hard science, but so what?
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    16. Re:And like feng shui, IT'S BULLSHIT! by blue_teeth · · Score: 1

      Permit me to support this arguement with real life example. Yes, I'm an Indian where this Vaastu seems to have originated.

      Way back in 1990's...I took over as General Manager in an IT firm. Business was not doing well and I was racking my brains as to why things are not working. There lands a self-appointed Vaastu expert in my office. He takes a tour of our facility comes with a conclusion that North-East area (where our library was located) is unbalanced and suggested something heavy placed in that room. His fee? Rupees 100,000 (approx US$ 2000 at current rates). I kicked him out of office. Later found a disgruntled Regional Manager had recruited 24 employees just to get even with Chairman of the organization. In one day, the Regional Manager and 19 employees (I feel sorry for them) got shafting. Business started growing.

      To me, Vaastu is ergnomics at workplace and home. Be it proper ventilation, lighting, temperature etc.

      Vaastu is a mind game. Those vulnerable, where things are not working for them fall for this. Be vary of self appointed Vaastu and Feng Shui experts.

      Oh by the way, ./ games section seems to have bad ergnomics...errr...bad vaastu :)

      Cheers
      BT

    17. Re:And like feng shui, IT'S BULLSHIT! by Chas · · Score: 1

      Note, I never said good composition using these rules is impossible (though from the state of the author's own site, it looks somewhat unlikely since their idea of good composition is limited to color scheme).

      And yeah, people can do the right thing for the wrong reason. That doesn't change the fact that they're contributing to a lemming effect. Of course, if we could convince them all to just jump over a cliff...that'd be a good thing too. ;-)

      "You simply reject it because the rules are not derived from the first principles of logic"

      Among other things. But thanks for assigning my motives to me...

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    18. Re:And like feng shui, IT'S BULLSHIT! by 2008 · · Score: 1

      Your post was badly formatted and spelt poorly, does that mean that we should ignore what you're saying too?

      --
      I quit!
    19. Re:And like feng shui, IT'S BULLSHIT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehe, yes, I agree. I especially wonder how the 'INDIA MART' banner in the lower right corner of the screen figures into the site's Vastu...

    20. Re:And like feng shui, IT'S BULLSHIT! by deathshadow60 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the structure is messed because I forgot slashdot tries to make the HTML be html, instead of defaulting to normal text... Been about four to five YEARS since I last posted here.

      --
      I went looking for trouble, and boy, I found her...
    21. Re:And like feng shui, IT'S BULLSHIT! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Nah, you don't have to go that far. It's supreme irony by itself when he rants about "self-riteous (sic) asshole's [sic] personal opinions" (expressing a self-righteous personal opinion) and turns around and says "only people with double-digit IQ... actually listen to these jackasses."

    22. Re:And like feng shui, IT'S BULLSHIT! by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      He's not selling anything.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    23. Re:And like feng shui, IT'S BULLSHIT! by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      According to your posting history, it's been about one year since the last post.

      Sunday November 27 2005

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
  5. What the heck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just took a look at her site and it's pretty crappy.... Maybe I just know nothing about what is attractive.

    1. Re:What the heck? by mei_mei_mei · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the blue links clash, the grammar and spelling is poor, the first 'read' link doesn'twork(!), the layout changes as you move through it so navigation is awkward and it's baically just an ad for her book. Rubbish.

  6. Page length by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wtf .. she called it a negative .. I like a long page length .. seriously who the heck wants to click through multiple pages??

    People who advocate short page lengths probably don't use the web for information.

    And yes I think google should default to 100 results .. why not?

    1. Re:Page length by pasamio · · Score: 1

      Perhaps not as a default, I don't mind the default, but when I have to trawl through a few pages, I want to be able to expand that out. Perhaps the ability to dynamically set the size of the result set. There are certainly some times when I'd like to scroll through one long list instead of clicking 5 times and waiting for the reload on each of them.

      --
      I always wondered where this setting was...
    2. Re:Page length by Danse · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Wtf .. she called it a negative .. I like a long page length .. seriously who the heck wants to click through multiple pages??

      People who advocate short page lengths probably don't use the web for information.


      Gotta agree with that. People who want multiple pages are usually trying to pump ad views. This chick just seems to want to make things pretty, or her version of pretty anyway. I guess if you can spout BS well enough to sound knowledgeable, people will throw money at you. Serves no useful purpose to anyone else, but must be nice.
      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    3. Re:Page length by anagama · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You've got my vote as well. It seems to me that the shorter the page, the more devoid it is of content. Scrolling down works incredibly well with monitors -- it might be a hassle with actual paper but the web doesn't always have to be a metaphor for the physical world.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    4. Re:Page length by boethius78 · · Score: 1

      Well, even if "the horizontally elongated layout give the site too much air", at least "the graphics and sans serif font induce good water flow". This is good to know. Before I read TFA, I thought they were caused by all the beer I drank last night.

    5. Re:Page length by mikek3332002 · · Score: 1
      And yes I think google should default to 100 results .. why not?
      Speed. Not Everybody has fast broadband. Also how often does one view results lower the 10th?
    6. Re:Page length by klang · · Score: 2, Informative

      In web design there are two schools: "The Card Sharks" and "The Holy Scrollers".

      Both schools have advantages and disadvantages. The specifics will always be root for discussion between webdesigners.

    7. Re:Page length by boarsai · · Score: 1

      Not to mention bandwidth. If you can get the result in the first 10... why waste your bandwidth when you're pumping out billions of pages a day? The resulting cut in bandwidth would probably be quite delicious. The bottom line is money :) Less bandwidth, more adverts.

    8. Re:Page length by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like long pages too, but sometimes shorter ones help when surfing on small devices, handhelds etc. because a page needs to be loaded entirely in memory. Of course this comes from a purely practical point of view: webmasters who split a normal page in multiple stamp sized text areas surrounded by tons of ads should be fed with their balls wrapped in used toilet paper.

    9. Re:Page length by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      Scrolling down works incredibly well with monitors -- it might be a hassle with actual paper but the web doesn't always have to be a metaphor for the physical world.

      Right on! Another paper-based oddity that I'd like to get rid of is the use of black text on white background. If you use a CRT and read such pages, you could be just as well staring at a light bulb.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    10. Re:Page length by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Uggh. White text on a black background looks horrible. Other colour combinations are equally ineffective. I, for one, am glad we have progressed beyond the days of green text on a black background. Perhaps you have your monitor turned up too bright?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    11. Re:Page length by Alef · · Score: 1
      Wtf .. she called it a negative .. I like a long page length .. seriously who the heck wants to click through multiple pages??

      Possibly, she could have meant that we post way too many uninsightful comments...

    12. Re:Page length by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Are you joking? Turn on the lights in your room so the ambient light is of the same intensity as the monitor. If you put a paper and a monitor side-by-side, you'll find the brightness of white areas is the same. There's a reason for the common recommendation to turn on the lights, ya know.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    13. Re:Page length by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      I, for one, am glad we have progressed beyond the days of green text on a black background. Perhaps you have your monitor turned up too bright?

      On the other hand, you could argue that we have progressed beyond the days of paper and ink, and we are no longer restricted by that technology's color combination. It's great that we can choose the colors to our liking; I don't particularly like green on black, but grey or cyan on black is quite nice.

      Somehow I don't like the idea that background color should be the main light source. I think background by definition should be passive, which in a light-emitting display means dark. It's the same kind of rationalization that music has quiet passages (rather than white noise) when there's nothing going on.

      Of course, this rationalization doesn't necessarily hold in practice, and since I mainly use LCDs anyway, black on white is not so bad. But I like to question this whole paper-based mentality that is also reflected in the desktop metaphor and WYSIWYG. I think it's seriously limiting to think of computers as fancy, extensible typewriters, and I think the color scheme can guide your thinking to some extent.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    14. Re:Page length by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if this person submitted their own design to /. when they had that contest. I'd like to see how fugly their design is .. If they did, it makes sense as to why they are saying retarded things about the /. design.

    15. Re:Page length by bremstrong · · Score: 1

      Maybe 97% of users don't go beyond the first 10 hits, and it might increase the load on google's system to do 100 links, although it might not depending on how the system works.

      Also, google really likes to get the results back quickly, and a bigger page would take longer to load over slow connections.

    16. Re:Page length by dangitman · · Score: 1
      I think it has very little to do with paper and ink. It's just the most effective color combination for most purposes. At least in my opinion. Black is too much of a gaping void. Colored backgrounds aren't neutral enough*. I don't think it's about ludditism. Remember that in the early days of the web, they "progressed beyond" the ink-and-paper paradigm, and the majority of websites used colored backgrounds and text. God, that was awful! I don't think it's a coincidence that as the web has matured and evolved, we have gone back to black-on-white.

      Of course, things will eventually go full-circle, and we will go beyond the LCD into things like electronic ink and passive displays. White would make the most sense for a passive display, for reading outdoors, or in dim light, etc.

      * I was actually kind of fond of the light-blue-on-dark blue color scheme of the Commodore 64. It worked really well with the low-resolution graphics, and poor-quality displays (or TV sets used as displays). White didn't work very well with those displays. But for some reason, the exact same color scheme does not translate well to modern high-resolution monitors. I'm not sure why that is. What looks fine on a C64 looks like utter crap on a modern desktop.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    17. Re:Page length by arose · · Score: 1
      Somehow I don't like the idea that background color should be the main light source.
      [..] and since I mainly use LCDs anyway, black on white is not so bad.
      Hmmm...
      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    18. Re:Page length by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      I'm trying to say that LCDs are less harsh/irritating than CRTs in this respect, but still bad when someone forces the black-on-white scheme on you (since both are light sources).

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    19. Re:Page length by admdrew · · Score: 1
      Also how often does one view results lower the 10th?

      I'd say I end up looking past the 10th result maybe 25% of the time. Sometimes some of the top results are either too obvious that they won't be helpful, or whatever I'm searching for ends up returning a lot of duplicates (that aren't automatically filtered by google) and I'll need to scroll through a dozen entries to get something worthwhile.

    20. Re:Page length by Deltaspectre · · Score: 1

      My site uses an ivory background with a lighter black text color and everyone who's visited says it's pleasing on the eyes. (Although it is fairly devoid of content)

      --
      My UID is prime... is yours?
    21. Re:Page length by Eideewt · · Score: 1

      I laughed pretty hard at that one -- she managed to criticize the one thing that everyone actually likes about Slashdot.

      For that matter, geeks tend to like dark colors. I doubt the dark (not black; maybe a certain web designer's monitor is off) top of the page is causing anyone trouble. To me it creates a void around the header, making the large page it precedes seem less oppressive.

    22. Re:Page length by arete · · Score: 1

      It's more nuts than that - she called the page BOTH disproportionately wide AND disproportionately long. If it's in both directions, the word for that is "big" not "disproportionate" It makes me think she's viewing it on a monitor smaller than that of your intended /. reader.

      (And yes, I realize it's very important a website be LEGIBLE on a small monitor, which not all sites are. But it's also very reasonable to also _optimize_ the design for the monitors you think your viewers have...)

      --
      Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
    23. Re:Page length by a.d.trick · · Score: 1

      This may make you want to cry, or commit some heinous act like genocide, but I've actually met a few designers who insist on ridiculouly short pages and their reasoning has nothing to do with ad spamming. The reason was this: the boss didn't know how to scroll down.

    24. Re:Page length by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think you need to turn up the refresh rate on your CRT. High refresh rates are much easier on the eyes. A small percentage of the population, including myself, can see a CRT flickering at 60 or 70 Hz. With a low refresh rate like that I will quickly get a headache unless I dim the display or use a dark background.

      I have also had issues with a CRT wobbling ever-so-slightly side-to-side. That gave me a massive headache as well. The problem turned out to be a transformer (one of those square boxes you plug into an outlet that converts from AC to DC power for modern electronics). The transformer was positioned near the display and the AC current shifted the electrons sideways one or two pixels 60 times per second.

    25. Re:Page length by krunk4ever · · Score: 1

      This is where AJAX comes in handy. Why just 100 results, why not all?

      I really like Live.com's image search, where instead of having a next/previous page link, they have a scrollbar. Scrolling down (mouse or hitting page up/down) will display more results as if you were clicking next page, but doing so doesn't need to load a different page. Through AJAX, it's able to do so quite well. I mean they even have buffering algorithm where the next few pages are already downloaded to quickly show you when you scroll down.

      IIRC, they had that implemented on their default search before. I wonder why it was removed.

      So you CAN have short page lengths and still show infinite amount of information.

    26. Re:Page length by Danse · · Score: 1
      This may make you want to cry, or commit some heinous act like genocide, but I've actually met a few designers who insist on ridiculouly short pages and their reasoning has nothing to do with ad spamming. The reason was this: the boss didn't know how to scroll down.

      Well, I just have to assume that greed and/or stupidity are always involved in such decisions somehow :)
      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    27. Re:Page length by dangitman · · Score: 1
      I dunno. How is the black-on-white scheme "forced" on you, when you can change the colours to your preference?

      Also, having the letters themselves be a light source isn't too good, because you get an after-image of the letters which is very annoying. It's like burn-in on your retina. This doesn't happen so much with white letters, because your eyes adapt to the overall brightness.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    28. Re:Page length by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      So basically it looks like they are viewing your site on a miscolor-calibrated monitor with a low contrast?

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    29. Re:Page length by Phrogman · · Score: 1

      Yet I have read a couple of studies that concluded that typical browser users are resistant to scrolling and show a tendancy to lose interest in the contents of a page if they are forced to scroll. So while you might argue that its easy enough to do, depending on your user, you might want to avoid it if possible. Breaking a long article up into chunks can make it a bit easier to digest and perhaps less intimidating to the viewer, it can help divide a subject into more manageable seeming segments etc. I think that is the real reason you see many articles broken up into distinct segments displayed on seperate webpages, rather that just the opportunity to present more advertising, although that may well be a factor of course.

      As for color, black text on a white background works better than any other color combination apparently. We have settled on this combination due to centuries of trial and error and I am sure if some other combination worked better we would all be using blue ink on orange paper or whatever combination worked best in the end. Its a matter of making the writing visually distinct and contrasting it with the page while not overly straining the eyes. If other combinations were more effective don't you think the publishing industry would have switched to them by now? Now, admittedly with a CRT we are talking active color sources, not passive reflective surfaces, so I am sure that makes a difference and results in higher eye strain. I look forward to new types of visual display that rely on different means to display their images in the future.

      --
      "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
  7. don't laugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shut up and help me point /. towards the West to balance our vastu/feng shui

    Trust me, it will ward off dupes.

    1. Re:don't laugh by SumoRoti · · Score: 0

      Please doctor Benway, tell me where I can put my mouse on!
      I am a bit lost... Help!

      Your own website is so fantastic, doctor. I agree that the perfect feng-shui slashdot site should be: '/. (more zen indeed).

      QuoteSlashDot Community,
      for the news are prettier

  8. Asymmetry is cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The lack of symmetry parallels the random nature of visitors viewpoints and ideologies.
    The colours are earthen and comfortable.

  9. Penn and Teller by Konster · · Score: 4, Informative

    Penn and Teller had a decent show on Feng Shui, and I agree with with their conclusion.

    It's all bullshit!

    Just like the subject of this news post.

    1. Re:Penn and Teller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Being something of a sinophile, and the owner of a modest library on feng shui, let me digest what it really says.

      Don't live so close to water that it washes your house away. Don't live so far away from water that it's an inordinate pain in the ass to get. Don't live close to the edges of cliffs which might collapse, or which you might fall off of. Do live in a location where your dwelling has as much protection from the elements as possible. But putting it directly in the path of the tree that looks kind of rotted and is about to fall it probably a bad idea too. Don't shit where you eat or are likely to drink. The sun is bright and hot, avoid suffering it unnecessarily. But the sun is also helpful, make sure you've got enough of it.

      All it is are a set of building codes set to a spiritual narrative that's supposed to make it easy to remember. A smart person with good aesthetic sensibilities is required to make it work. Well compensated professionals in Asia, they get paid because they have some measure of the later, and more than some skill blending Confusian sensibilities with modern needs and tastes. The people on Bullshit! that's not what they're doing. They're banking on the ignorance of others.

      The real tenents, with the mysticism striped away, they make a lot of sense to me. Except for the living underneath a rotting tree thing. Look, you buy the home you can afford.

    2. Re:Penn and Teller by kentrel · · Score: 1
      That's all well and good but feng shui practitioners claim it to be a science, which it clearly isn't. The PENN AND TELLER episode was about exposing the fact that this clearly wasn't true.

      People can believe in whatever spiritual mysticism they like, but whenever anyone claims it to be a science that's when people like P&T, scientists and myself get mad :)

    3. Re:Penn and Teller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You misunderstand, and so do Penn and Teller, in there case it was intentional to illustrate a point. In the West "science" generally means something adhears to the scientific method, and is mericlessly tested. This isn't strictly true. The "Sweet Science" is a vestige of a meaning that has somewhat fallen away. It is that meaning, which is perhaps more difficult to parse in an Asian context. The traditions which Feng Shui draws from can certainly not be said to be divorced from education. And indeed it's this enlightened, educated connotation that is important. The serious practicioners (as distinguished from the posers and hacks on Bullshit!) of Feng Shui take offense at implications that their art, and that's truly what it is, is phoney magic, devoid of any skill or value. And they should. Their's is a world of artful blending of form and function, ancient authority and modern convienence. Call it a theory of Design.

      Imperfect, and incomplete though it may be, replete with mystical jargon though it is, it is not without some truth, wisdom and value. It is rigorously practiced, there is a stratification of hard earned skill, and it does incorporate observations of the natural world. (Drowing is bad, a typhoon folding your house isn't much better, bright light, or baking in the summer heat are uncomfortable.) While it might not be a suitible foundation for a class in a College of Engineering, it isn't bullshit. Considering the population Feng Shui was ment to serve, not terribly far removed from American evangelist lifestyles, the sprititual terms and analogies such as Shar Chi et al, are probably necessary just to move the process along. The soundness of the fundemental tenents of the art shouldn't be judged how they are traditionally communicated. No more than we should decided "compassion" is an outmoded and over-all bad idea based on how Southern Baptists occasionally misapply it in the debates on setting national policies.

    4. Re:Penn and Teller by Domstersch · · Score: 1
      ...skill blending Confusian sensibilities with modern needs and tastes.

      Oh, as a fellow sinophile, I completely agree. Compensated Feng Shui professionals obviously have honed confusian sensibilities. How else would they get anyone to believe their bullshit.

      --
      =w=
    5. Re:Penn and Teller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm...isn't this just common sense?

    6. Re:Penn and Teller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Vastu is quite scientific but is mostly mumbo jumbo these days. Im an Indin and I must say that India has thousands of vastu quacks like Narang who have zero talent and are desperately vying for publicity. This article sucks and slashdot's vastu just went down for putting up this article.

    7. Re:Penn and Teller by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      If there's one thing that's uncommon, it's common sense. Think of this as the equivalent of a modern building code; most of the ideas behind those are also common sense.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    8. Re:Penn and Teller by admdrew · · Score: 1
      That's all well and good but feng shui practitioners claim it to be a science, which it clearly isn't.
      ...
      The serious practicioners (as distinguished from the posers and hacks on Bullshit!) of Feng Shui take offense at implications that their art, and that's truly what it is, is phoney magic, devoid of any skill or value.

      These implications arise from the claims by those that think feng shui *is* science. Clearly there can be high value associated with skilled art, but that doesn't make it a science.

      The 'natural observations' you mention seem largely based on common sense. Grouping them together can be useful, but can hardly be, as you said, a foundation for a concrete science. I don't want to debase how you describe feng shui, but it should be strongly noted it's an art with large aesthetic components.

    9. Re:Penn and Teller by JetJaguar · · Score: 1

      No, you misunderstand. You want to claim that the basis for feng shui is some sort of common sense building code that is wrapped up in some sort of "spiritual" narrative. Ok, fair enough, I'll buy that.

      However, if your claims are true at some level, then different feng shui practitioners should be able to independently come up with similar arrangements for a given room (after all they are all using the same common sense building codes right?). Penn and Teller showed that this is not the case. In their tests, there was not a single point of common design between any of the people they tested. So, no matter what you want to claim about the "common sense" foundations of feng shui, it is fully apparent that the "mystical" interpretations are completely subjective and have nothing to do with any of the common sense they are supposed to be based on. The only truth, value, and wisdom associated with feng shui is what is subjectively attached to it by the people who have been tricked into thinking that there is really something to it.

      --

      Shop Smart, Shop S-mart!

    10. Re:Penn and Teller by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      let me digest what it really says.
      Such wonderful advice, give you to me (I hope my sentence comforts your soul and brings you many happy new adventures).

      In the US, we don't call that Feng Shui, we call it FUCKING COMMON SENSE.

      Don't live so close to water that it washes your house away. Don't live so far away from water that it's an inordinate pain in the ass to get. Don't live close to the edges of cliffs which might collapse, or which you might fall off of.

      That's so 17th Century. How about this: Try living in a modern society. Here's a few more Feng Shui^H^H^H^H^H^HCommon Sense informations for you:
      Don't live in Utah if you have a brain.
      Don't give your handgun to your kidnapper.
      Don't give your wife the combination to your safe.
      Don't give RIAA/MPAA your playlists.

      Feng Shui is a fancy marketing BS term for "you have no taste in how you decorate your room".

      My response to that is: "Your decorating sense has no taste in how I occupy my space most effectively".

      Most human beings will seek out the path of least resistance to accomplish the task at hand.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    11. Re:Penn and Teller by Damek · · Score: 1
      largely based on common sense.


      It's worth pointing out here that there is no such thing as common sense. Such sense is learned. Or else such sense would be more common.
  10. The most important aspect of Vastu Shastra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... is undoubtedly that it provides their high priest advocates with income.

    Coming from the scientific side, I'll dispense with mystic harmony in favour of logical and self-explanatory layout, thank you.

  11. Re:You're kidding me right? by Zelucifer · · Score: 1

    need I say more then RTFA? Someone at WIRED, got an up and coming web designer to rate /. you pompous twit ;) This design is older then that individual.

    --
    The corner of a round room
  12. Re:You're kidding me right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think you read the article properly. Slashdot's design was reviewed by that "doctor", not designed by her.

  13. I've known for a long time.... by The+Famous+Druid · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... that the average /. poster is 'unbalanced'.

    --
    Quidquid Latine dictum sit, altum videtur (anything said in Latin sounds important)
  14. Re:You're kidding me right? by rdwulfe · · Score: 1

    Ok.. I just have to point out... You might want to actually *read* the summary and article. Yeah, I know it's pointless drivel, but you wouldn't have even made that comment if you had. No. Some idiot in India is making a lot of money applying their version of Fung Shoe (or whatever it's called) to web design. They analyzed Slashdot. It made their spiritual advisors puke. Or whatever. Wulfe Too tired to be gentle.

  15. Evidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, no examples, no theory, no reason.

    For all I know, after reading the 'article', this person doesn't even exist.

    What the hell is the point of posting this submission, if it is nothing more then an unsubstantiated opinion, utterly and completley lacking any substance.

    If this person really has a clue, and is such a wonderfull designer, where is the evidence.

    Article author and "one of India's hottest Web designers", please take your 'vastu shastra', (aka feng shui), and place it deep into your anal cavity.

  16. Windows by Konster · · Score: 4, Funny

    Windows Vastu.

    It's clear that Microsoft's GUI designers have been smoking some pretty serious weed and studying arcane bullshit notions and ologies of myth when you use Vista or IE7.

  17. I sense a great disturbance in the Force by Ksempac · · Score: 3, Funny

    Of course Slashdot's Vistu is bad...The site is full of the Dark Spirits of No-life Geeks and Noob-bashers. ;)

  18. Her website is damn UGLY!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.webvastu.com/

    "When houses, restauants, shops, shopping centers can be made according to the ancient science of Vastu Shastra then why cann't the Websites also follow the same rules"

    -Dr. Smita Jain Narang

    Gee .. I dunno maybe cuz .. CAUSE IT'S AS UGLY AS GORILLA ORANGUTAN BALLS!!

    (btw, what's a "restauant"?)

    1. Re:Her website is damn UGLY!! by Danse · · Score: 1

      Holy crap. That site is hard on the eyes. People pay her to do stuff like that?!

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    2. Re:Her website is damn UGLY!! by Anomolous+Cowturd · · Score: 1

      I *really* hate it when these idiots claim what they're doing is science:

      "Webvastu, a fusion of two sciences Vastu Shasta and Internet (websites)."

      --
      Software patents delenda est.
    3. Re:Her website is damn UGLY!! by KimmoA · · Score: 0
      From the code:
      <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//SoftQuad//DTD HoTMetaL PRO 4.0::19971010::extensions to HTML 4.0//EN" "hmpro4.dtd">
      What... the... fuck?
    4. Re:Her website is damn UGLY!! by _Hellfire_ · · Score: 5, Funny

      http://www.webvastu.com/

      I wish I hadn't clicked on that link.

      The goggles... they do NOTHING!

      --
      "And then I visited Wikipedia ...and the next 8 hours are a blur..."
    5. Re:Her website is damn UGLY!! by BoberFett · · Score: 1

      Indeed. My eyes actually hurt after looking at the yellow and orange on her site.

    6. Re:Her website is damn UGLY!! by zephc · · Score: 1

      Obviously we are just educated stupid.

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    7. Re:Her website is damn UGLY!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think decent people cann't buy her book.

      She's a horrible web designer, it's unreadable, typo-inside(r) and just plain ugly!

      Maybe she's a hottie and she f_cked the publisher ;)

    8. Re:Her website is damn UGLY!! by phyrz · · Score: 1

      That one looks hot compared to this one. How's the blank spot top center, right in the 2nd hottest eyeball spot on the page. Sheesh.

      --
      Don't point that gun at him, he's an unpaid intern!
    9. Re:Her website is damn UGLY!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I spy internet explorer on her book cover

    10. Re:Her website is damn UGLY!! by euniana · · Score: 1

      They just can't spell.

    11. Re:Her website is damn UGLY!! by idonthack · · Score: 1

      If you look at the source code it refrences "hmpro4.dtd", which with a quick googling turns out to be a DTD used only by "HoTMetaL Pro 4", a web development app released in 1997 by a company that was acquired by Corel in 2002. Blegh.

      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    12. Re:Her website is damn UGLY!! by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      "(btw, what's a "restauant"?)"

      What's a "GORILLA ORANGUTAN"?

    13. Re:Her website is damn UGLY!! by ettlz · · Score: 1

      My God. It's like the Saturday morning shit after a killer curry on Friday night.

      "My eyes! The goggles, they do nothing."

    14. Re:Her website is damn UGLY!! by gatzke · · Score: 1


      I went to grad school with a nice indian lady that always used bright puke orange and yellow in ppt slides. Painful. Maybe it is a cultural thing, since I have seen saris that have that bright color as well.

      I personally dislike orange for everything but Halloween. Football teams especially: Auburn, Tennessee, Clemson, Florida, Miami, etc.

    15. Re:Her website is damn UGLY!! by admdrew · · Score: 1

      Clearly you have the wrong window size / screen resolution. Didn't you know it's your fault you're not seeing it "correctly?"

      I mean, it's probably impossible to code one of these web-pages such that it looks decent on a variety of screen sizes.

    16. Re:Her website is damn UGLY!! by Snarfangel · · Score: 1

      I *really* hate it when these idiots claim what they're doing is science:

      "Webvastu, a fusion of two sciences Vastu Shasta and Internet (websites)."


      Then you're really going to hate my science of Astrolphrenics.

      --
      This tagline is copyrighted material. Please send $10 for an affordable replacement.
    17. Re:Her website is damn UGLY!! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I changed my screen size. Now it looks incredibly cluttered instead of just very cluttered.

    18. Re:Her website is damn UGLY!! by Sir+Unimaginative · · Score: 1

      oh god my brain is crying WHAT THE HELL DID THAT PAGE DO?

      it doesn't even have tear ducts....

      --
      The problem with your idea is that it makes sense.
    19. Re:Her website is damn UGLY!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Dr. Smita Jain Narang

      Damn, this chick got a PhD for this nonsense?

      Just goes to show that India will give a PhD to any fool just to bump their national numbers!

      I'm sure she will make a fortune because all of the US PHBs that are in love with cheap labor India will eat this crap up!

    20. Re:Her website is damn UGLY!! by chochos · · Score: 1

      btw, what's a "restauant"?

      A place where you can eat wabbit?

  19. Bunch of horse hooey by glwtta · · Score: 1

    While I agree that Slashdot is ugnly as sin, that has to be the worst "evaulation" I've read in a long time.

    The page should have less articles so it's "proportionate"? What do they think it is, a book?

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
    1. Re:Bunch of horse hooey by richdun · · Score: 1

      The page should have less articles so it's "proportionate"? What do they think it is, a book?

      Actually, yeah, probably. One of the biggest problems with many "design" experts is that they never learned true design - just how to design to a specific medium. Many of the shortcomings of web designers is that many were previously print designers who switched over without learning what the differences in user expectations, interactions, etc. are.

  20. Consider the source ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Narang reports that of the 500 sites she's redesigned, three-quarters received an immediate boost in traffic."

    Good to know this is a professional magazine, where the facts are checked, not one of those lame blogs.

    1. Re:Consider the source ? by mei_mei_mei · · Score: 1

      That's not even a very impressive claim:

      - She doesn't say how much the traffic has gone up.
      - a whole quarter stayed the same or went down!
      - even is her design was _worse_ than what it replaced there'd pobably be an inital jump in traffic as people checked out what was new.

    2. Re:Consider the source ? by elwin_windleaf · · Score: 1

      SEO is a bunch of superstitious witchcraft anyways, so who knows? Perhaps Google is a fan of elementally balanced web pages.

      Of course, I would like to see some numbers before I go re-working all the "Paanchbhootas" of my site...

  21. People in glass houses... by scdeimos · · Score: 1

    Erk, has anyone taken a look at Dr. Narang's website, The fusion of two sciences, Web Vastu?

    1. Re:People in glass houses... by Konster · · Score: 1

      LOL, good spot. She needs to apply some vastu to her site, or perhaps just a soothing balm.

      LAFF at "The fusion of two sciences" bit on there.

    2. Re:People in glass houses... by interiot · · Score: 1

      GGAAHH, that site is far from perfect.

      Press Section: multiple videos autoplay, forcing you to either mute you speakers or rapidly click all the pause buttons.

      The three boxes ("About the book", "What is...", and "How to order") don't have enough black border around them. But more importantly, they look very similar to Google AdSense ads, and the positioning on certain pages makes this illusion worse. So you eye ends up automatically tuning out the most important content.

      The red background is at least minimally functional (kudos for getting yellow text to be readable on a bright red background), but gaaah, I think I'm getting a sunburn from it.

    3. Re:People in glass houses... by Ash-Fox · · Score: 3, Funny
      Erk, has anyone taken a look at Dr. Narang's website, The fusion of two sciences, Web Vastu?
      It reminds me of Powerpoint presentations from '97.

      *Shivers* So.. cold..
      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    4. Re:People in glass houses... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? It kind of reminded me of a tire fire at sunset.

    5. Re:People in glass houses... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that site is crap and displays signs of amateur web design. The colours are all wrong and make the text difficult to read. It doesn't even pass W3C validation.

      What a joke.

    6. Re:People in glass houses... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      That site wins the Grand Jesus_666 Prize for Most Useless Fusion Since The 5.1-Bladed Razor. Congratulations.

      By the way, that site is good for you. It makes you avert your eyes from the screen in disgust, thus giving them a break from staring at it for hours. Thus it belongs in the same category of ergonomic goodness as Goatse.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    7. Re:People in glass houses... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to think myspace looked like shit, until I took a look at this.

  22. Restore balance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More PONIES!

  23. Content? What content? by Geof · · Score: 1

    "The page should scroll down for only two or three screens, not six". We need less news! Maybe if the whole world followed vastu shastra we wouldn't have this problem.

  24. i'd like to map some attributes by flacco · · Score: 0, Troll
    The process entails mapping page attributes - HTML, colors, graphics - to elements like fire, water, and air.


    i'd like to map my nuts to her face.

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  25. Her website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some links to sites she's designed according to these principles would be useful. This is apparently the website of the book: http://www.webvastu.com/ and it more or less exactly fails to please the eye.

  26. Americans will buy anything "exotic".... by UncleTogie · · Score: 1
    ....if I told someone that they should arrange their house to suit some passages in the Bible, they'd likely tell me to go piss up a rope.

    If I wrapped it in Eastern Mysticism, they'd get a guru, moving company, and reed sandals.

    Stupid, Stupid Rat Sheeple. {...with apologies to Jeff Smith}

    --
    Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    1. Re:Americans will buy anything "exotic".... by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1
      ...if I told someone that they should arrange their house to suit some passages in the Bible, they'd likely tell me to go piss up a rope.

      If I wrapped it in Eastern Mysticism, they'd get a guru, moving company, and reed sandals.

      That depends on the American you're talking to; there are probably plenty of them who'd lap it up if you gave them some Biblical quote that one could, if one worked really hard at it, interpret in some way that one could, if one really wanted to, think referred to some Web design issue. (Maybe they'll prefer popunders to popups thanks to "get thee behind me, Satan".)

    2. Re:Americans will buy anything "exotic".... by Paul+Crowley · · Score: 1

      Here in London you can see people on the Tube reading books about how to improve their health and wealth through the power of prayer. It's a weird sort of magic for an unusual sort of Christian.

  27. Design of the Book's site by Demiansmark · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Assuming that the site for the book (http://www.webvastu.com/) was done according to the principles within it I don't see what this text could offer. My knee-jerk reaction to the aesthetics of the site is that it looks as if it were done using the Frontpage WYSIWYG in 1997. Looking at the HTML the site uses table based design, has presentation markup in the html, and contains a host of other minor errors (i.e. uppercase tags). The CSS http://www.webvastu.com/style.css) is a mess and demonstrates a lack of understanding of modern 'best practices'.

    I might be able to accept the idea of some people using such a whishy-washy approach to design if the end product could stand on its own but that's not what I'm seeing by any measure.

    1. Re:Design of the Book's site by pasamio · · Score: 1

      Copyright ©, Web Vastu. All Rights Reserved Site Developed by IndiaMART InterMESH Ltd.

      Now their site, http://www.intermesh.net/ is horizonally elongated, buggered if I know what the address really does, intermesh, but meh, its got blue in the top (star!), sans serif (this has been web common sense for a rather long time now, I mean really), it has a good page length, you cant scroll (because there isn't actually real information there) but of course it actually takes you four clicks to get to a page that has 8 sentences broken into 4 paragraphs (http://www.intermesh.net/website.html) ignoring the drop downs that don't work in Epiphany (and probably not any other Firefox browser at that). Finally the footer is thin to non existent, to the point it looks like the header (sans the drop downs). No brown, fawn or copper. Though it does have links there, they only have 8 compared to Slashdot's 12 (plus second OSTG link), so you lose on this as well, try adding more links or graphics.

      On a seperate note my BS meter is broken again...stuck on the extremities again. *sigh* Time to make a bigger range again.

      --
      I always wondered where this setting was...
    2. Re:Design of the Book's site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also fixed width. I hate that. Freakin' designers with their control fixation. My browser, my width. Cope.

    3. Re:Design of the Book's site by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      The only point I'd give her for her review of Slashdot is the left hand column. (Is that supposed to be some kind of menu?) I've been using Slashdot for years and still dislike that column - it just seems kind of a crammed together kludge. I dunno if it has to much air in it though.. we better check the pressure gauge.

      Overall, I think Slashdot is well designed though and it's upgrade is pretty good. It's an informational site that has stood the test of time and many many users. That's more than most site's can say.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    4. Re:Design of the Book's site by mce · · Score: 1

      I also dislike the site (oh the colors!), but you're all mixed up in your evaluation. What that webvastu thing is all about, is the graphical design, not the underlying HTML/CSS. Sounds like you're an IT person who has learned that design is about structuring but who was never really told that it also is about the look and feel. I can make a good looking site with crappy HTML, just as much as I can make a crappy looking site with perfectly clean and standard compliant HTML.

      (Hey, I'm an IT guy, so I somewhat know what I'm talking about. It's just that I was raised in a context with many professional artists with strong interests in non-Western cultures.)

    5. Re:Design of the Book's site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      and contains a host of other minor errors (i.e. uppercase tags)
      Firstly, uppercase tags are not an error at all in HTML. Tags are case-insensitive. Secondly, while complaining about a non-error, you did make an error: "i.e." means "id est" ("that is"). You want "e.g." for "exempli gratia" ("for example").
    6. Re:Design of the Book's site by KZigurs · · Score: 2, Informative

      The funny thing is that the page has this as DTD:
      !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//SoftQuad//DTD HoTMetaL PRO 4.0::19971010::extensions to HTML 4.0//EN" "hmpro4.dtd"

    7. Re:Design of the Book's site by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't it be about both? If a page is going to be in harmonious balance with the elements and mankind, it ought to be both aesthetically pleasing and balanced to the human eye as well as exhibit favorable characteristics under scaling, different text needs for different usability audiences, etc.

      My take - this is basically BS. I can couch good principles of web design in Hindu, Buddhist or any other sort of mysticism, but if I don't have the aesthetic sense and technical abilities to practice what I preach, then it's worthless.

    8. Re:Design of the Book's site by Eric+Pierce · · Score: 1

      And no favicon!

    9. Re:Design of the Book's site by Enselic · · Score: 1

      Well, she never claimed she was good at writing code.

    10. Re:Design of the Book's site by mce · · Score: 1

      You're entirely right: it should be about both. I just wanted to point out that the article is about something else than what the HTML gurus are reading in it. In saying that, I didn't mean to imply that the technical part is irrelevant.

  28. Snake Oil Tag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on now. This is just plain ridiculous. What evidence supports that this actually brings business to the site owner and not to the person analyzing the site?

    1. Re:Snake Oil Tag? by bensch128 · · Score: 1

      Because the consultant analysing the site says so.

      So it must be true!!! ;)

      Ben

  29. BS by Wellington+Grey · · Score: 0, Redundant
    vastu shastra, the Indian counterpart of feng shui


    It's interesting to see that each culture will independently discover the same form of bullshit.

    -Grey
  30. My analysis of the good Dr's site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On my newest aquisition, a 19" widescreen (stop laughing, this is serious) lcd panel, Slashdot's content takes up the whole screen, as it should, expanding to fill available space.

    Dr. Narang's website, however, cowers in one corner of the screen, daring not venture out, for fear of losing it's balance. Instead, it ends up looking forlorn, as though it expects my mouse pointer to begin beating it at any moment, knees tucked under it's chin, tears streaming down it's face. It truly is a pathetic, juvenile attempt to create a website.

  31. Look how harmonious Webvastu is ! by bushboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    http://www.webvastu.com/

    Yes, it's a picture of beauty which adapts web standards from, er, well from a few years back really.
    The site looks like a large blob of curry stains, but boy, is it ever harmonious, with the use of white text on a curry brown background !

    Note how the footer is in black italic text and how the whole construct is cunningly created in tables!

    Note the subtle use of a ruddy great drop shadow on the logo!

    Hear the stunning web page background music when you visit the news page - that sounds like it's playing out of a toilet after a heavy nights drinking in a curry den.

    Yes, folks, it's a far better layout than Slashdot, indeed.

    After all, who needs good design when you've got Webvastu !

    It's harmonious darnit, because we all love muddy brown websites!

    --
    A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
    1. Re:Look how harmonious Webvastu is ! by hoWat · · Score: 1

      luckly enough I have background music _turned off_ when browsing, nothing fills me with so much harmony than having to scramble for mute button. Anyway, I checked out the the link to the 'site developer' on the bottom: here is the doctype:

  32. Page Length by Explodicle · · Score: 1
    The page should scroll down for only two or three screens, not six. "This site is disproportionate," Narang says.
    1. So you should only be viewing the site in a full screen window on a 4:3 screen, with a specific resolution and text size, with no sidebars open? Because that's the only way everyone would have the same height/width ratio. I bet this analyst wishes the web was all in PDF.
    2. I hate having to click "next page" on sites where the content is mostly text. It's just another set of ads to view and another pause for the page to load.
  33. Re:You're kidding me right? by nihaopaul · · Score: 3, Informative

    as much as i don't believe in feng shui; some of it does serve a purpose with common sense, in design we do have things called balance and these are represented by different shapes with different weights when they have an equal mass, not only shapes but also colours have the same impact, just draw a neutral Grey box inside a Green square and a neutral Grey box inside a Blue square. but simply standing back and analyzing what isn't right can be done by anyone, but understanding why it isn't right takes practice and education. like take restaurants, you dont want to put a mirror facing the door as people's psychological impression is theres someone there, feng shui attributes this to 'loosing wealth out the door', also say you have a long Bar thats narrow (pub type of bar), you dont want to use patterns that attribute to the fact that its long, you'll want to break up the area with different patterns or furniture.

    all these things can be applied to a website, along with page layout can be applied, a really good read of this can be found in "the Zen of CSS design" - this was a very good read for both technical and design principles.

  34. Mistrust of Today's Technology by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 0

    I can't be the only one who noticed that the lead story of Slashdot on the day they critique the page reads "Mistrust of Today's Technology". I find it ironic that they choose that moment to use ancient pablum to analyse the site. That's right - everything old is new! Fung shui is the new rational thought, vastu is the new fung shui! Why is it that none of the supposedly free-thinking new-age whackjobs out there take you seriously if you're not drawing on the ages-old wisdom of people who thought the world was flat?

    --
    Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
    altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
  35. Good Water flow by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1
    The graphics and sans serif font induce good Water flow.

    So will several cups of tea or several glasses of beer.

    (As for "...Rob Malda chose an excellent URL, even though it's confusing when read aloud", one wonders why the good doctor thinks the domain name was chosen in the first place.)

    What I really want to know is what Web Vastu says about loading up your page with stupid Flash animations so that when you go to a new page, the page slowly drops down or slides in or rolls down, or the letters fly into place one at a time, or something such as that. The people ultimately responsible for the decisions to create pages such as that should be disemboweled and strangled with their own intestines; I'm willing to let the Web designers off if their client demanded it and they really needed the business.)

  36. Feng Shui helps reading comprehension by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So does actually reading. Taste foot much?

  37. Slashdot was just redesigned by snuf23 · · Score: 1

    This design is older then that individual.

    Um, the current slashdot site is a redesign from earlier this year. Did you miss all the posts from CmdrTaco evaluating the various design submissions?

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
    1. Re:Slashdot was just redesigned by Anubis350 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, but the basic site structure hasnt changed. It got prettier bars, some new cosmetics, a much needed update on various usability features and hopefully a new, working, css based threshold system soon. It looks a bit sleeker and less 90s, but /.s "look" hasnt really changed.

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    2. Re:Slashdot was just redesigned by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      and hopefully a new, working, css based threshold system soon

      Yes I'm also looking forward to the times where I can load 400+ comments, have them hidden by CSS, so I can see the remaining 10 or so 4+ posts I care about.

      That would be so much better.

      In fact this is one of the biggest sins of CSS: people assume it's ok to just splatter everything in the code and then hide the offensive parts depending on situation and media. Especially insulting is the use of mobile media CSS, to generate huge pages, 80% of which is hidden on a mobile device. Mobile devices have unlimited supply of free bandwidth, so it makes total sense, right?

      Well, I'd rather do what's a server-side job on the server.

  38. and whats wrong with the layout? by Se7ensamurai · · Score: 1

    I kinda like the layout. it's not much different than the old version... besides, on-line diffusion methods differ greatly from RL diffusions. so any similarity is purly coincidental. once you are used to a site and its layout, any change from that layout causes confusion and dissemination. sometimes when a site changes too much i stop going there for information. another thing that ticks me off are those late night text-messanging commercials. theres far too many of them. BAH!!!!

  39. And who needs Webvastu when you have Zombo? by sserendipity · · Score: 1

    For the newbies among us: http://zombo.com/

  40. arrrrgghhghghg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a designer, and have worked as a consultant for much of my career, and this is the kind of stuff that makes me cringe. She's applying bullshit to design principles, and undermining any productive discussion around form, content, or technologies. And yes, /.'ers, there are such things as "design principles." What really makes me sick is that people are paying for her services.

    I propose a new system of enlightened aesthetics, "Ustav," based on the spiritual nature and teachings of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. Everything shall be have wings, be curly, and use serif typefaces.

    Why? Because when the FSM speaks to me, this is what he tells me. He doesn't speak to you? Well, says more about you than the FSM, doesn't it? NOW PAY ME.

  41. Re:You're kidding me right? by Broken+scope · · Score: 1

    Whoa watch it with that reasonable attitude. That could get you hurt around here.

    --
    You mad
  42. Dr. Narang, meet Dr. Dre by proverbialcow · · Score: 1

    She said, "Well, Daddy, if I had some nuts on my chin would those be chin nuts?"

    I said "Hell no bitch, you'd have a dick in your mouth! mouth! mouth!"

    --
    The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
  43. You understand not the truth. Let me guide you... by sserendipity · · Score: 1

    As I posted above, all truth and beauty is http://www.zombo.com/ .

    Blessings.

  44. So yeahh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /. should look more like this!

    http://www.webvastu.com/index.html

  45. preferences on google search results by Romancer · · Score: 3, Informative

    Uh, under preferences.
    The link just to the right of the text box that says preferences.

    --


    ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
    ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
    1. Re:preferences on google search results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      If your preference is not to allow Google a cookie (which makes a lot of sense especially with Google), just append
      &num=100
    2. Re:preferences on google search results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There are the bookmarklets too. To zap google's cookie:
      javascript:(function(){C=document.cookie.split(%22 ; %22);for(d=%22.%22+location.host;d;d=(%22%22+d).su bstr(1).match(/\..*$/))for(sl=0;sl<2;++sl)for(p=%2 2/%22+location.pathname;p;p=p.substring(0,p.lastIn dexOf('/')))for(i in C)if(c=C[i]){document.cookie=c+%22; domain=%22+d.slice(sl)+%22; path=%22+p.slice(1)+%22/%22+%22; expires=%22+new Date((new Date).getTime()-1e11).toGMTString()}})()
    3. Re:preferences on google search results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said DEFAULT TO. Changing your preferences means it's not default.

  46. Everything Has A Place by Joebert · · Score: 1

    I'd like to tell this Vastu person the same thing I tell the Feng Sh...way people.

    I appreciate what you're trying to do, but I will not hesitate to beat you into a coma with anything you've moved & I kick in the middle of the night.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  47. e:He website is damn UGLY!! by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 0

    It's so t of like a dine .

  48. Says it all really by Kangburra · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://validator.w3.org/check says Result: Failed validation

    If you can't get that right you've got no chance.

    --
    Common sense is not so common
    1. Re:Says it all really by kjart · · Score: 1

      http://validator.w3.org/check says Result: Failed validation

      Yes, I would tend to agree

    2. Re:Says it all really by Saikik · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Says it all really by earthbound+kid · · Score: 1

      That is really bizarre. All they need to do is close one div tag to get a valid page but they haven't done it? That's really weird. Of course, for a long time /. was famous for blocking all attempts to load the page into validator.w3.org at all, so it's nice that they've at least stopped blocking it.

  49. She has a point by donnacha · · Score: 0, Troll

    I don't know anything about the principles of Vastu Shastra but the lady has a point. Slashdot's laziness in revamping their site design and usability is what enabled Digg to completely trump Slashdot's massive head-start and leave it curled up in a ditch, coughing blood.

    I do occasionally come back here, mainly because I get pulled in by the RSS feed but, sweet Jesus, the slightly flashier new design still doesn't make up for the random, inadequate nature of the ratings system - if I don't have mod points, I could see the most interesting post but have no way to vote it up. What a ridiculous waste of their readership.

    1. Re:She has a point by Ant+P. · · Score: 0, Troll

      The design had nothing to do with it. Digg's popularity is directly related to the hypochondriac pharma culture and the rise of self-inflicted diseases like ADHD.

  50. Re:You understand not the truth. Let me guide you. by anagama · · Score: 1

    I don't get it. Colored flashing orbs. Nothing else. Someone say "whoosh" and then explain it to me please.

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  51. India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One more reason I hate my country. India is so religious and stuck in superstitions that it makes you feel sick. I have seen computer scientists ( haha ) arguing
    that a star's gravity has effect on your brain and is the reason why astrology is correct.

    1. Re:India by phyrz · · Score: 1

      i'll keep that in mind for when i move there next month. :/

      --
      Don't point that gun at him, he's an unpaid intern!
  52. Unbalanced... by me.at.work · · Score: 1

    Guess that's why we have all the dupes and the trolls hanging out around here.

    Imagine what it'd be like with a harmonic feng shui or - if you will - vastu inspired design:
    - No dupes
    - Well written summaries of articles
    - Good grammar
    - No Ms bashing (you think? really?)
    - No trolls

  53. Hilarious. by isolationism · · Score: 1

    What a load of bollocks. What follows next is the sales pitch to glue some special crystals into the web server to help it reverberate with only good juju, like a cosmic drum ... or whatever.

    These are pretty tall words coming from someone with such a shitty website, too; http://www.webvastu.com/ needs more gradients, larger leading, more fonts, narrower columns, and definitely more orange. Especially the orange. For a special treat, disable style sheets: accessibility++. I would make some statement about karma here but (A) I don't know the Indian-equivalent term, and (B) I'm assuming Dr. Smita is in fact already completely blind.

    Is it wrong of me to also be cynical that the good doctor can't even spell their own gimmicky 15-seconds-of-fame loanword, "Vastu", consistently on their own website? No, go back to smoking your hookah, doc. Your website is awesome, dude--it's everyone else that's got it wrong.

    1. Re:Hilarious. by mrjb · · Score: 1

      I would make some statement about karma here but (A) I don't know the Indian-equivalent term
      Correct me if I'm wrong but I think the term Karma originated in India. So I'd say the Indian term for Karma is Karma.

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    2. Re:Hilarious. by zephc · · Score: 1

      I think your sarcasm meter needs re-calibrating...

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    3. Re:Hilarious. by saurabhdutta · · Score: 1

      FYI Karma is an Indian word derived into the English language during the colonial rule.

  54. Orange by Plutonite · · Score: 1

    Check out the official website. Wonderful isn't it?

    Last time I saw so much orange was when the dutch fans swarmed into a german airport during Germany 2006. Also, one piece of advice from a friend:
    Don't overlay solid red divisions on top of gradient orange/yellow backgrounds, and when you want to do gradients don't do it like this.

    It looks totally uncool.

    1. Re:Orange by doom · · Score: 1
      Plutonite (999141) wrote:
      Check out the official website [webvastu.com]. Wonderful isn't it?
      Not the best site I've ever seen but in general light text on a dark background like this makes a lot more sense to me than the black-on-white fad that the Macintosh foisted on us (computer screens are not actually made of paper: maybe they shouldn't look like paper, eh?).

      Someday it would be cool if someone would actually do studies of this stuff instead of trying to elevate their personal taste to a "design principle": my bet is that people can look at screens longer if there's less light coming out of them.

      Instead, more often than not, I use the Firefox feature to change the colors: Edit/Preferences/Content/Colors.

  55. B*llsh*t ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All a matter of taste IMHO.

    Instead of fighting sites with aaptive layout such as slashdot, this guy should fight agains most corporate sites that are not able to handle screens of various size but 1024x768 ! Anybody with a 1980x1200 screen will understand what I mean by "stamp-like-website" ;-)

    Guys, there are known techniques using CSS (relative font sizing, flexible layout positioning to adapt to screen size !). So to any web UI developer out there, do care or your website will never look optimal on high end computer :(

    1. Re:B*llsh*t ! by dosun88888 · · Score: 1

      1. It's 1920x1200
      2. The point of high resolution displays is to fit more on the screen. Do not maximize your browser window. If the site does it for you, then it was written by a moron.
      3. Are you suggesting that every single site use vector graphics to display images, when some browsers can't even support them at all, and others do it in non-standard ways?

  56. You made a funney. by isolationism · · Score: 1

    Thanks a fucking lot, my 2-month-old kid was finally falling asleep now that it's nearly five in the morning, and then you had to go and write what you did.

    I suggest submitting the name change recommendation to Microsoft along with a suggestion that the default skin should paint everything with orange gradients.

  57. Validation doesn't hold water... lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  58. So in case you were wondering... by tansey · · Score: 1

    According to her analysis, the ideal slashdot web design is this.

    1. Re:So in case you were wondering... by cskrat · · Score: 1

      Funny how, to me, whenever I see yellow on a website my first thought is "something broke, let's see what it looks like in IE."

      --
      My God! It's full of eval()'s.
    2. Re:So in case you were wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish I had modpoints; that site made me laugh out loud.

  59. Re:You understand not the truth. Let me guide you. by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

    Whoosh. :)

    You need to have sound turned on. I think it's poking fun at vacuous marketing promises, dotcom absurdities and the everything-can-be-done-online mentality that gave us the iLoo. Well, "could have given".

  60. You have an addiction (probably crack) by Einstein_101 · · Score: 1
    I don't know anything about the principles of Vastu Shastra but the lady has a point. Slashdot's laziness in revamping their site design and usability is what enabled Digg to completely trump Slashdot's massive head-start and leave it curled up in a ditch, coughing blood.

    I don't know what planet you live on, but digg hasn't - and will never - trump slashdot. Even though digg is successful, it has nothing to do with the slashdot's interface. Digg has more of a "leet hacker" feel to it (at least it did for the 6 months I tried it out), and none of those moronic antics would last a minute here on slashdot. You don't have to be a genius here. Hell, you don't even have to be knowledgeable about the topic you're speaking on. But you do have to be well spoken, and digg is too over-ran with teenagers to ever become a major player in the news website game. The only benefit to digg is the speed at which it's updated. Because the stories don't have to pass through the editors, it tends to be more up-to-the-minute than slashdot. However, the drawback is ever more dupes that slashdot, and the occasional mindless drivel that the kids voted to the front page.
     
    I'm sorry, but I left digg months ago, and I haven't looked back.
  61. Dynamic stabilisation. by MROD · · Score: 1

    Nah.. Slashdot isn't unbalanced it's dynamically stabilised, just like a Segway!

    --

    Agrajag: "Oh no, not again!"
  62. Feng Shui is correct by macadamia_harold · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And like feng shui, IT'S BULLSHIT!

    While the explanations claiming "energies" for Feng Shui may not be correct, the human psychology behind it is. Those same principles may or may not be applicable with regards to web design, but don't discount entirely that which you clearly do not understand.

    1. Re:Feng Shui is correct by kentrel · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      What you CLEARLY don't understand is that anything based on a false premise is not correct, and is not a science. You already acknowledge the entire basis for feng shui (energies, urm.. NOT psychology) is not correct. Therefore anything based on that is false and immediately suspect.

      What are you doing on Slashdot if you don't understand basic scientific principles like this? The only psychology aspect of this is the gullibility of human beings.

    2. Re:Feng Shui is correct by Skreems · · Score: 1

      And if the idea of "energy" used in Feng Shui is just a useful abstraction of the psychology of human interaction with an environment? If that's true then you're just talking out of your ass, no?

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    3. Re:Feng Shui is correct by Chas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "While the explanations claiming "energies" for Feng Shui may not be correct, the human psychology behind it is."

      Yeah. There's a sucker born every minute.

      "Those same principles may or may not be applicable with regards to web design, but don't discount entirely that which you clearly do not understand."

      Yeah. And my cash-mishandling invisible man in the sky who is going to sentence me to eternity of fire and brimstone and suffering...but loves me can beat up yours too!

      The problem is, I DO understand it. This is why I call it like I see it. Bullshit. First to last.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    4. Re:Feng Shui is correct by kentrel · · Score: 1
      No. Of course not.

      It's used in feng shui in the literal sense, as if there's LITERALLY positive and negative energy lines zipping about the place and turning a table to face west helps disrupt this energy flow.

      Just because you're trying to twist it to suit your own definition shows how little you understand the claims made by feng shui practitioners, science, and human psychology. Also, if indeed I am talking out of my ass then considering your comment you should have no trouble in believing what I say too.

    5. Re:Feng Shui is correct by gomoX · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What you CLEARLY don't understand is that anything based on a false premise is not correct, and is not a science. (...) What are you doing on Slashdot if you don't understand basic scientific principles like this?

      I think it's you who doesn't understand "basic scientific principles". The 1st sentence you posted is, well, wrong. It's a well-known fallacy. You can conclude many true things based on the fact that the sky is red. All you need is a consistent set of "rules" for such deductions to be made.

      If you are going to pretend you are some science advocate at least get it right, and keep an open mind. Just because there are some things you don't understand, it doesn't mean they are wrong. It just means you don't understand them. Oriental cultures have been around for a while. Don't underestimate what centuries of observation of human behaviour can produce. There are some things you can know wihtout knowing how they work. I for one am not a feng-shui fan but don't discredit a thousand year old discipline just because some guy is making money out of it.

      Whenever in doubt, remember Godel. There are always some loose ends.

      --
      My english is sow-sow. Sowhat?
    6. Re:Feng Shui is correct by umbra_dweller · · Score: 1

      I have this funny belief that sickenss is caused by invisable demons. But I noticed that water seems to have some mystical property that dispels these demons. In fact ever since I started washing my body, especially my hands after they get dirty, the demons have all but vanished. Clearly I should make a habit of these activities, perform my daily demon clensing ritual...I'l call it a shower. My methods are a bit off, but is my conclusion wrong?

    7. Re:Feng Shui is correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, so "anything based on a false premise is not correct", right?

      We start with a false premise: every object is approximately spherical.

      If we accept this premise, we can conclude: The Earth is an object, therefore it is approximately spherical.

      According to your school of logic, anything based on a false premise is not correct; therefore, the Earth is not approximately spherical.

      (If science is more your thing - logic is clearly not your field - consider Newtonian physics, which is a "wrong", but still very useful model of the world.)

    8. Re:Feng Shui is correct by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Dude, the sky is red. At least some of the time.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    9. Re:Feng Shui is correct by Alef · · Score: 1
      It's used in feng shui in the literal sense, as if there's LITERALLY positive and negative energy lines zipping about the place and turning a table to face west helps disrupt this energy flow.

      What exactly do you mean with "literally [...] energy"? Our modern concept of energy (as in thermodynamics) is much younger than feng shui, so that is obviously not what the Chinese concept of qi refers to.

      While the Chinese may have constructed theories to explain their observations that aren't true in a literal sense (whatever that means -- language is nothing more than symbols anyway), these theories may still yield conclusions that are consistent with future observations.

      Also, just because a complex theory involves incorrect assumptions doesn't mean all it's conclusions are bullshit. Newton mechanics is based on false premisses, but is it totally useless? Clearly not.

    10. Re:Feng Shui is correct by FuryG3 · · Score: 1

      Agreed, it can go either way. I know someone who is an "amateur" and goes around helping people with their living spaces (and does quite a good job), but there are some serious "pro" nut-jobs who I wouldn't let into my house normally.

      There was some show (was it Bullshit?) where they selected 3 different Feng Shui consultants to come into a house and redecorate it. It was expected that, if this is a Science, they would come to similar conclusions regarding what the layout should be. At the very least, they should use the same logic and descriptions when rearranging things.

      Of couse, they didn't. They were pretty crazy. But that doesn't mean that the information/rearrangement they gave was all completely crap. The colors of a room, the arrangement of the furniture, the type of light fixtures, etc, all have a very important effect on your (and your family's/coworker's) mood. Getting a third opinion from someone who rearranges things for a living and has thought about these things could make your life better or easier.

      Some things are obvious. Anyone who's worked in a cubicle knows that it's best not to have your back to the entrance (and that natural light is important), but still people frequently don't do this in their home/office. Some are less obvious. People often fail to maximize their available space, or make a room difficult to pick up after or clean. By default, people arrange their living rooms (and bedrooms) around the TV, but if they're asked if that's the lifestyle they want, they say no.

      That doesn't mean that you need an expensive waterfall in your entrance, or to paint your bedroom red, or to get a day-glo yellow couch. Or (in this case) you need to completely redesign your website so that water flows better (wtf does that MEAN?!).

    11. Re:Feng Shui is correct by notnAP · · Score: 1

      I should make a habit of these activities, perform my daily demon clensing ritual...I'l call it a shower. My methods are a bit off, but is my conclusion wrong?
      Maybe, maybe not.
      Of course, until Slashdot readers actually start taking showers, we'll never know.

    12. Re:Feng Shui is correct by ElephanTS · · Score: 1

      I don't understand feng-shui by any means but, as a psychologist, there are scientific reasons behind colour meanings as used for instance in the Luscher colour test.

      http://www.viewzone.com/luscher.html

      http://www.colour-experience.org/matching/matcol_p sych_tests/matcol_psych_test1.htm

      I've no idea how this would apply to a website but I do accept that colours induce physiological responses and it may be possile to use these in design.

      --
      spoonerize "magic trackpad"
    13. Re:Feng Shui is correct by rjhubs · · Score: 1

      What do you know about logic? You can construct a valid argument based on any premise you desire. A false premise does not imply a false conclusion and actually when performing a proof by contradiction you have to assume a false premise to reach the true conclusion.
      Take these to premises (In logic they are usually called Assumptions)
      1. Assume all fish can fly
      2. Assume all robins are fish
      3. Therefore all robins can fly
      That is a valid argument and a true conclusion based off untrue premises.

      I think a course in logic should be a requirement before stepping onto any forum.

    14. Re:Feng Shui is correct by Scratched · · Score: 1

      Your analogy doesn't work in this case. Feng Shui is considered a "science" but if you were to hire 5 different feng shui "experts" they would all re-arrange your furniture 5 completely different ways. Any exact science should yield the same results every time. If you don't understand that you shouldn't be on Slashdot.

      Penn and Teller did an episode of Bullshit on Feng Shui that did a pretty good job of showing that Feng Shui is bullshit. Check it out and you'll see see that feng shui is far from correct.

    15. Re:Feng Shui is correct by Elemenope · · Score: 1

      So, what you're saying is, if I have a medical condition correctly diagnosed, and five different doctors recommend five different treatments for that condition, that medicine is bullshit? That happens all the time, with different doctors obviously having different training and idiosyncratic preferences, and even different basic theories on how to attack a particular ailment. Sometimes they even disagree on what the condition is or is caused by (cf. Post Lyme Syndrome, any and all cancers, etc.). If you want to stop going to doctors, be my guest. I wouldn't want you to throw away money on bullshit.

      --
      All the techniques ever used to make men moral have been themselves thoroughly immoral... (Nietzsche)
    16. Re:Feng Shui is correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A false premise does not imply a false conclusion

      Although you are right, you are treading on dangerous ground when talking to non-logicians, because they see such statements as validating non-logic based discourse.

      Your 1,2,3 example is not even remotely valid, BTW, it merely has the *form* of a valid logical argument. Wittgenstein would be happy with it, but Feynman would be shaking his head in disbelief.

    17. Re:Feng Shui is correct by Scratched · · Score: 1

      There's a big difference between Feng Shui and medical science.

      5 different doctors could have varying opinions on certain remedies, but usually because a condition hasn't been around long enough for the medical community to agree on a solution that works every time in every scenario. Feng Shui is a "science" that has been around for a very long time and is touted as being an exact science. Doctors may not have a good idea on how to treat cancer, but the science and technology used to fight cancer is still relatively new so it's expected that it will change as we learn more about it. That's how science works, many different theories are brought up for review until a conclusion is met. No good doctor will give you a recommendation on how to treat something and tell you with 100% certainty that it will work unless it is known for sure.

      Something so established like Feng Shui should not vary so much

      ... unless it is bullshit.

    18. Re:Feng Shui is correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "don't discount entirely that which you clearly do not understand."

      We understand it perfectly. Multiple double-blind tests have been done, one of which was done on TV on Penn & Teller's show Bullshit. They hired multiple Feng Shui experts to come in to rearrange the furniture. Each successive Feng Shui expert (unknowingly) critized the work of the "expert" before him and then undid it, putting the furniture in a new position - one of them even put it back to how it was originally.

      Here is my informed criticism from watching experiments on Feng Shui: it is BULLSHIT. Its practitioners are fraudsters.

    19. Re:Feng Shui is correct by mrpeebles · · Score: 1

      I think a better response may be that while the treatment of an individual patient may have an element that is non-scientific, that treatment is supposed to be motivated by studies on groups of patients that are scientific, and also by deductive reason. I am not an MD, but I would suppose that there will always be an art to treating an individual- after all, science deals with the common behaviors of many people, but an individual can always behave in some strange way that deviates from the norm. But individual Feng Shui treatments are not motivated by a body of knowledge that can in any way be said to be scientific in the modern sense of the word.

    20. Re:Feng Shui is correct by admdrew · · Score: 1
      Of course, until Slashdot readers actually start taking showers, we'll never know.

      Does spilling a 2 liter of Mountain Dew all over yourself count as a shower?

    21. Re:Feng Shui is correct by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      The sky is red? Are we on K'Tau?

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    22. Re:Feng Shui is correct by raduf · · Score: 1

      Feng Shui is not science. Feng Shui is a *tool*. It's up to you to use it or not, but science NEVER claimed to be the only or even the best tool for the job. In most things, science is by far not complete enough to work in real time. Try dancing with science only. Or writing. Or cooking. Or having sex. Or getting a job. Or programming. Or ... anyways, get a list of verbs and fill in the blanks. Science is a sucky tool for most things.

      What science is very very good at is verifying things and establishing landmarks. The earth is round, so all theories that include earth staying on a giant turtle should be re-checked. Sickness is caused by microbes, so certain behaviour around sick people is valid, and taking blood less so.

      Not even specialists use pure science. Doctors and engineers also use tools, tools designed by true scientists or by years of experience, but I've seen to many doctors in my life (and my family) not to know they use experience and intuition a lot more then theory.

      I don't mean at all Feng Shui is a good tool. I don't know Feng Shui. I also suspect (from common sense) most books on the subject don't know Feng Shui either. But I strongly disagree the opinion that anything that isn't based on science is bad, and anything that is must be good. This comes from a generation of people born with TV's and Internet who believe in science like the ancient humans believed in spirits.

    23. Re:Feng Shui is correct by N3Roaster · · Score: 1
      Dude, the sky is red. At least some of the time.
      No, it only looks that way. Here's a link.
      --
      Remember RFC 873!
    24. Re:Feng Shui is correct by Jerf · · Score: 1
      So, what you're saying is, if I have a medical condition correctly diagnosed, and five different doctors recommend five different treatments for that condition, that medicine is bullshit?
      Depends on the treatment. Few ailments have that many accepted treatments, and I'd raise my eyebrows. But there are a few exceptions; five doctors might prescribe five different antibiotics. (But they're still all antibiotics, not antibiotics from one, exercise from another, and magnet therapy from a third.)

      Better analogy, though I hate getting into analogy wars, is five doctors, five diagnoses. At that point, yes, at least four of those diagnoses are bullshit, and good odds the fifth one is wrong too. This happens; see the Discovery Health Channel's "Mystery Diagnosis" show for many examples.

      The difference is that this is an unusual occurance, the kind of thing that can get you on a TV show when it happens. Five Feng Shui advocates producing five completely different diagnoses is the common case in Feng Shui.
    25. Re:Feng Shui is correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot, aren't you?

      Science isn't a tool. Mathematics is a tool. Science is a systematic methodology based on the precept that all detectable phenomenon have a naturalistic cause. Science is a PROCESS.

      One does not need to "believe" in science. Even if you don't believe that differences in air pressure can hold a chunk of metal in the sky, planes won't just suddenly drop from the heavens. Televisions won't suddenly cease operation just because you find the concept of a stream of electrons smashing into a bit of phosphorous and causing it to glow unbelievable. The only thing you need to believe for science to be correct is the evidence of your own senses. And if you don't believe that, than Feng Shui, Vishnu, Chop Socky or any other bullshit pseudoscience is also suspect.

      There is no such thing as "good" or "bad" in science. Science simply _is_.

    26. Re:Feng Shui is correct by raduf · · Score: 1

      You're an idiot, aren't you?

      No, you're an idiot! *throws poo*

      There is no such thing as "good" or "bad" in science. Science simply _is_.

      LOL!

      Ok, now seriously.
      You said science isn't a tool, it's a process. I said science is a sucky tool. Is there really such a big difference?
      As far as beliving in science... I don't get your point. Or at least I don't know how it touches mine. Maybe you could re-read it?
      I meant that the current generation sees science as something to believe in, like some magic that works. Few bother to understand the inner workings and limit themselves to faith (not bad btw, I DO take on faith that "differences in air pressure can hold a chunk of metal in the sky", because I never bothered to understand the whole underlying mechanism). But this leads to strange opinions when discussing science vs feng shui, for example.

    27. Re:Feng Shui is correct by StormReaver · · Score: 1

      "Don't underestimate what centuries of observation of human behaviour can produce."

      Ancient Chinese observations lost a lot of credibility when they resulted in using mirrors to reflect bad luck. Feng-Shui falls squarely into the same hole.

    28. Re:Feng Shui is correct by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      The difference is that you or I can perform a medical diagnosis, given enough books, time and persistence. Scientific medical practice (the part of medicine that IS science) is like any other applied scientific knowledge -- anyone can do it. Doctors are special for two reasons: they carry a good portion of that knowledge around in their heads and they're masters of the non-scientific parts of medicine. Surgery for instance, is an art. Some science has been applied to it, but when you actually get down to using your hands to perform a skilled task you're in the realm of art.

      Feng Shui may have scientific elements, but it's (general modern) practice doesn't seem to be scientific. It's an art, depending on the esthetic values of it's practitioners.

    29. Re:Feng Shui is correct by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      All that tells you is that Feng Shui as a science is bullshit. It does not tell you anything about whether or not it has value or if its followers happen to (as a cause or a consequence) be aesthetically "gifted" or "aware" or whatever.

      The only way to do that, is to have the practitioners arrange the furniture and then judge whether or not you like their results. As for me, I have found that while I think it's bullshit, these weirdo mystics do tend to be more talented than I am. Maybe that's because I'm a bad artist, but maybe it's also because good artists are attracted to really wacked out ideas. If the second is true, then perhaps Feng Shui is useful for selection.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    30. Re:Feng Shui is correct by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      My qualms about such findings: due to the nature of human subject research, we know a great deal about the psychology of college sophomores. We make nativist or universalist claims about the human species from such data at great risk. I'm not a complete anti-nativist - the Berlin/Kay color research was persuasive to me, and based on a clear physiological model (i.e., that the human experience of color primacy is based on the structure of the human visual system at the cellular level - although there is a slight variance between genders.) But higher-level claims about color and affect strike me as about as only a little better than claims based on astrology.

    31. Re:Feng Shui is correct by don.g · · Score: 1

      My vague memories of first year philosophy would suggest that it was valid: it's an instance of modus ponens. If a than b; a; therefore, b!

      It's certainly not sound -- the first and second premises are just silly, and soundness requires that your premises are true as your form being valid.

      Even though the terminology (valid, sound) is confusing to people who aren't familiar with it, the ideas are still useful. An invalid argument (cows have four legs; my horse has four legs; therefore, it is a cow) has another point of attack than untrue premises -- and this means you may have an easier time demolishing it.

      Of course, this assumes that the person you are trying to persuade must have some ability to reason logically -- far too many people seem susceptible to the (if a than b; not b; therefore not a) (modus tollens) fallacy, for instance.

      --
      Pretend that something especially witty is here. Thanks.
    32. Re:Feng Shui is correct by NichG · · Score: 1

      The problem with this example is that you didn't use the false part of the assumption to derive the part which works. They're independant. The example you gave can be reduced to the following:

      I think X causes sickness. I notice that when I wash myself with water I don't get sick. So I will start washing myself with water.

      Notice that the first sentence is totally superfluous. The key bit of reasoning is 'I notice that when I do X, Y happens, so if I want Y to happen I will do X' which is a consistently logical way of approaching the situation.

      A better example would be if the belief in demons motivated a local priest to institute regular anointments with holy water. In that case an accidental congruence between the beliefs of the effects of water in one case with the actual effects would promote a successful conclusion. This sort of thing happens when the cause for the analogy being used to solve (or attempt a solution of) the problem is derived in a roughly consistent way with underlying observations, such that it has extensive merit. If I were to take a guess at reconstructing this, it'd be that people observed the importance of clean water for survival long ago, associated clean water with purity, and then that got tied into the religion as a symbol of purification - leading to a useful solution from an incorrect analogy because the analogy respects certain properties of the underlying reality - namely the importance of clean water.

      But there are still problems with this. The belief in demons causing illness could promote useless or harmful solutions as well as the accidentally helpful ones. With a flawed base analogy there's really no way to tell which will work and which won't without pairing with observation. Maybe one person would draw the conclusion that exorcisms would help with illness, or that they need to repeat some prayer or phrase until their voice goes hoarse, or whatever.

      Part of what science does is it cuts away the parts of an analogy that are inconsistent with the underlying observations until you're aware of the extent that what you're left with is applicable. So you can minimize the number of useless or harmful conclusions and maximize the number of useful ones.

    33. Re:Feng Shui is correct by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
      Yeah. There's a sucker born every minute.

      Well, not necessarily - people just don't like sitting with their backs to an open door (That's why most cubicles make folks feel very uncomfortable - they are set up so that supervisors can sneak up on the drones and see what they're doing - not for human psychological comfort, regardless of the bullshit about "communications". Just think - cubes could be set up so that you faced toward the opening and you could (a) have your back to an actual wall, (b) you could have privacy WRT to what was on your screen and (c) you could still hear everything around you. Also, if cubicles were to "foster communication", why do we let people who sit in them wear headphones to keep out the "communication". The only reason for cubes is that they're cheap and have the added benefit of imposing the feeling of control so essential to the modern business world, but this is another rant...). South-facing windows are better because of the sun they let in - even better when they are mulletted and somewhat shaded via tree branches (for those hot summer days).

      It may not be feng shui, but there are real psychological impacts that depend on movement flow, layout and other architectural tangibles that have been built into us evolutionarily and convenience-wise. And before you think that this is totally bullshit (P&T notwithstanding) - set up a room such that you need to walk around a sofa to get from a door on one side to a door on the other and tell me how long it takes you to move the sofa out of the way.

      --
      That is all.
    34. Re:Feng Shui is correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll give it some credit for being perhaps a reasonably good way to arrange furniture, but I don't buy for even one second the BS about the elemental crap or energies or whatever. Principles of symmetry and a little bit of common sense can go just as far, though.

    35. Re:Feng Shui is correct by earthbound+kid · · Score: 1
      The entire basis for X is not correct. Therefore anything based on that is false and immediately suspect.


      That's poor science. The entire basis for the caloric theory of heat is not correct, but we still use the Carnot engine today. Likewise, Newton's theory is not ultimately correct but is useful for approximations. Having a correct underlying theory is not a requirement for science. What is a requirement is usable results. Nothing else. If Feng Shui were tested and gave reliable results, that's all that would matter. Now, I don't believe such tests have been made, and in all likelihood Feng Shui is just a way of taking extra money away from the rich and gullible, but just having a poor basis ultimately is no reason to deny that something can be used pragmatically.
    36. Re:Feng Shui is correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many of these principles are well known in western design. No fruity asian superstitions are required. Furthermore, many of the fruity asian superstitions come up with arbitrary and pointless restrictions.

      Don't be a fool. Ignore these freaks and their "rules". Go buy a book on industrial or interior design if you must. But do retain SOME vestiges of your advanced civilization and its teachings.

    37. Re:Feng Shui is correct by HugeFatty · · Score: 1

      Honest question: what do you mean when you refer to God as being "cash-mishandling?" This is just out of curiosity.

      --


      I am clearly fatter than you.
    38. Re:Feng Shui is correct by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Saying fung shui is BS is like saying art is false. Design is a matter of preference, not a disprovable assertion.

    39. Re:Feng Shui is correct by Xamedes · · Score: 0

      now the luscher test isn't science at all - so no good example

  63. WebVastu by denominateur · · Score: 1

    http://www.webvastu.com/ - the page is horrendous, I certainly hope people don't adapt her style too much!

    1. Re:WebVastu by RKBA · · Score: 1

      Especially the crappy full justification of the too narrow column containing info about the author.

  64. It's the moderation system by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

    Slashdot's moderation system is what makes it unique. It's not perfect, but it works a helluva lot better than anything else. Oh, and yeah, the more mature audience (mostly :-P) helps too

    Now watch me get modded flamebait or something :-P

    --
    "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    1. Re:It's the moderation system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Slashdot's moderation system is what makes it unique. It's not perfect, but it works a helluva lot better than anything else.


      The moderation system totally destroys thread continuity and makes a large proportion of posts appear out of context, thus they do not make any sense unless they quote the post they are replying to as I have in this post.

      It would be tolerable if the pagination worked, but it doesn't. Try viewing a long thread at threshold -1 nested to try and establish some continuity and context and you are thwarted by broken pagination. I have tried all combinations of threshold and views, the pagination is broken.

      I could live with the moderation points and comments but inconsistently hiding posts in the default view just makes no sense at all. The end result is a frustrated reader, no continuity and increased server load. I fail to understand why it has not changed for the better.
  65. I wonder... by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

    ...What she'd make of fark? :-P

    --
    "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
  66. What can hurt business is a technical site that is by saikou · · Score: 4, Informative

    Relying on someone whose design is somewhat scary and made in glaring colors only (yes, there is an audience for sites like that, no, I don't think tech people would be fond of permanently blazing colors), has no sense of space and prefers to mush things together and applying arbitrary set of rules to all sites no matter what the target audience is. It's like asking Paris Hilton to design work clothes for a fireman.
    Plus, even that short recommendation is full off weirdness.

    A) Instability of "horizontal layout" is stupid. Put the pencil down horizontally. Is it unstable? How about standing on it's end?

    B) In case of established site URL does not matter, so this point does not apply. If people know that site has interesting stuff on it, they will put a bookmark or remember the address. Easy to type ones are good for radio/tv commercials

    C) Yellow? Even CNET toned down their yellow colors lately. Say hello to the world of Taxi Web sites? Green and blue are present as main elements. So... off the point

    D) What little graphics there is it's actually not the best feature of the Slashdot :) Logo is squished, icons are a bit scary, though been around for so long people are used to them

    E) I wonder if she never reads anything that is more than 2-3 pages long. Or has that obsessive clicky-clicky-syndrome where person wants, no, needs to click on something NOW! Hence desire to split everything into tiny pages and users that have to use tricks (such as "Print this page") to re-assemble stuff back. Again, technical field pretty much demands more text than, say, some short poems collections

    F) About the footer... She has to wear bell-bottoms then ;) ALWAYS! Because footer needs to be thick. Frankly many pages have no footer at all. Footer and footnotes can't be overloaded as that means "footnote" becomes primary content. These days footers are pretty much reserved for stuff that makes legal department happy. Of course Slashdot has links in the footer too ;)

    Conclusion: more bullshit than usual, less design and pretty things than one'd think. Slow news day at Wired. Slashdot is not for the customers of Vastu-fied sites (but *gasp!* you already know that ;) )

  67. Slashdot imbalancer? never! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm, let's see...

    Apple: those sweatshops are there for the good of mankind, trust me
    Google: China? what's China?
    Microsoft: Bill Gates is donating billions to charity? it's just a tax dodge!

    Yep, I'd say Slashdot is in some serious need of balance

  68. We've hit an all-time low by Tim+C · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Why was this posted? Is this news for nerds? Is it stuff that matters? Is it anything other than irrelevant bullshit?

    I wonder what interesting stories were rejectd so this crap could be posted.

  69. Another candidate for review by ardor · · Score: 1

    Here is a nice one for this Vastu person:
    http://www.somethingawful.com/jeffk/

    --
    This sig does not contain any SCO code.
    1. Re:Another candidate for review by pile0nades · · Score: 1

      LOL, that actually looks better than webvastu.com. Nice use of pastel colors with the white border between the sections is. Points off for excessive l33tspeak though.

  70. White text on light background and WordArt heading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My eyes, they buuurrnnn...

    Her methods are a step back in web development. Using a gimic to convince poor business decision makers.

    I had to go visit the Zen Garden to purge myself.

  71. Geo-stationary orbit?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The effect of the Vastu is permanent, because the Earth has been revolving round the Sun, in geo-stationary orbit for over 400 crores years creating the magnetic effect caused by the rotation.


    That's so wrong it's difficult to know where to start.
  72. antipagination by Przemo-c · · Score: 1

    Seroiusly I hate clicking 10 times to view relatively short article or a "gallery" ;] That's why I use antipagination a FX extension.

  73. Too much air by CriminalNerd · · Score: 2, Funny

    A lot of /. readers are full of hot air, so I think Smita is right in saying that there is "too much air flow" in /.

  74. Went to her "Balanced Site" by 1mck · · Score: 1

    I went to her supposedly "Balanced Site", and I see nothing there that would indicate that it is balanced in any way! Just because she has a "Dr." in front of her name doesn't make her an expert on what is a functional site or not. Besides she's just trolling for responses, so let's let this one die the quick death that it deserves! Here's the one glaring point that the "Dr." misses, and this is a hugely popular site, so much so that when all of us /.'ers read a story, and if there's a link to it the site can be shut down because of all of the traffic from us, and it even has it's own name...that's right the /. Effect! So, her pathetic opinion does not hold water!!! Thank you.

  75. Vastu by slack_prad · · Score: 2, Informative
    Vastu is more like a set of guidelines. Almost every house in India is built in accordance with it. It's more like: The main entrance being in a particular direction, enough light being in the house etc.,

    Even though some follow these 'rules' religiously now, I think they were primarily established to promote good atmosphere/convenience by the ancient people who set it.

    And there are always people who try to make money off it, by scaring people into believing that 'something bad' might happen if it isn't followed. And there are people ready to buy them.

    --
    Sent from my desktop computer
    1. Re:Vastu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please.. Almost every house in India? Either you live in some other country and have this deformed view of reality fed to you by your loving relatives or you live in some weird dimension. Almost every house in India is built with only the simplest of aims:

      1. Have as many rooms inside as possible. (the bane of developing cities)
      2. If you have money, build it bigger and shinier than the one next to it (it has to be a universal phenomenon though)
      3. If you have er.. shady income resources, make the exterior simple but the interior as plush as possible(again, it may not be limited to Indian scenario)
      4. Try to add as many floors on top as possible (legally or otherwise)- this is actually related to the first point. You will be surprised to find how many houses are 4-storied with one cubicle sized room taking one floor. This again has lot to do with there being more people than the land available so everyone trying to squeeze the maximum out of his piece of land.

      Although I agree with you about there being some sensible points in the 'vastu guidelines' like main door facing east to let the sunlight in etc. but a lot of it is simple bullshit. Moreover, people like to use it as yet another scheme for tricking people out of their money by scaring others of the repercussions if they did not follow their advice. Its just a few years back since this vastu fad has been in the media, mainly because people with more money than brains started applying it to their mansion styled abodes.

  76. Vastu is crap by r.muk · · Score: 1

    Since Vastu for buildings is crap, therefore it follows that Vastu for websites smeels even more strongly of ordure.

    Here in India vastu has a sporadic following. Otherwise apartment blocks with flats facing every which point of the compass wouldn't be popular - but they are.

  77. And has a fixed-width table! by dprovine · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Even worse than being ugly, the page uses fixed-width tables for layout:

    <table WIDTH="779" BORDER="0" CELLPADDING="0" CELLSPACING="0">

    She shouldn't be writing books on web design; she needs to read quite a few of them first.

  78. form follows function by NewToNix · · Score: 1

    And that's her problem...

    She wants the function to follow her form.

  79. The water of Slashdot is out of balance by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

    It lets too many marketing scams on its front page. I mean, why would Slashdot be offended by someone insults their design, and yet designs sites like this one.

    This 1995 style homepage with terrible code in desparate need of a complete rewrite.

    Yet, she/he (?) just said "Slashdot is out of balance" and you fall for it. I wouldn't post this obvious-things-your-already-know post, if it wasn't happening all the time.

    Just few days ago we have a book review article here, of someone who believes good web design involves huge paragraphs of page text rendered as a huge tall GIF image.

    1. Re:The water of Slashdot is out of balance by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Yet, she/he (?) just said "Slashdot is out of balance" and you fall for it.

            No we don't. It seems most people are actually making fun of her.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  80. water flow? by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

    Water flow harmony? on a fucking website? Sweet Zombie Jesus...

  81. flow by jovius · · Score: 1

    Slashdot's good water flow is great for the tubes !

  82. Ah HA! by sgant · · Score: 1

    I knew it! My faith in Slashdot and Taco have been restored and also I restored the faith to all of you that no one will RTFA! I've once again joined the ranks of people that go off half-cocked and spout out vitriol with only having 1% of the facts. Bravo I say! I'm carrying on a tradition!

    Next time, I'll be fully-cocked and won't try to respond to something when I'm half-asleep. I literally wrote that post after being awake for only 2 minutes.

    --

    "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
  83. Vastu not even good for ADHD people? by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    Checkout The press section of that webvastu site; and be knocked out with 3 or more movies/sounds playing alltogether at once ...

    It drives me nuts... For so far balance to the mind ;)

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  84. Is it all BS? Is Christopher Alexander bullshit? by ghastlygray · · Score: 0
    Penn and Teller had a decent show on Feng Shui, and I agree with with their conclusion. It's all bullshit! Just like the subject of this news post.
    Posts like this +5 informative one, or the ones preceding it ("it's one big ripoff") are the most predictable on Slashdot. I used to have such a rationalist, skeptical contempt for Feng Shui and the like; until I read Christopher Alexander. Now, I won't argue there are no charlatans toting bogus wisdom in exchange for hefty sums of money. But these old traditional ways of building, insofar they're genuinely traditional, do have their merit. Look, designing a home or a tool or a website isn't a banal task; there is no magic formula or process. It is the result of factoring in many forces which act in different directions, taking into account the way actual people use and live through this home or object. Alexander, before he was appropriated by software developers, actually talked about building homes which are good for actual people to use. He talks about such homes as having the "timeless quality", one which cannot be named, but achieved through the process he calls a "pattern language", shared by memebers of the community. Buildings and homes are consecutively made of such patterns, and nothing else but those patterns.
    Alexander notes that in modern times the "timeless quality" is gone -- due to monstrous architectural ambitions, and the lack of personal involvement of the homeowner with the building of his own home. I believe that these traditions, such as feng shui, are in essence a collective pattern language. They are a way of preserving those patterns which make a home good to live in. They are indeed phrased using mystical terms, such as the 4 elements and the like, but what they're saying through these terms essentially sums up to something like Alexander says. So I agree with the insightful anonymous of some comments ago, saying it's "common sense" -- only it's a bit more than common sense -- it's the collective common sense of whole communities gathered for years of collective living in homes and building them.

    The question remains if this applies to websites. I believe it is not.
  85. Web vastu by handledexception · · Score: 1

    Is this some kinda Web 2.0 thingy? [ROTFL]

  86. Where's the phlogiston? by Goodgerster · · Score: 1

    No, seriously. Without this fifth element, we're all doomed.

    1. Re:Where's the phlogiston? by MisterSquiddy · · Score: 0

      I thought that love was the fifth element. Did Luc Besson get that wrong?

  87. balance and harmony in all things by __aapspi39 · · Score: 0

    Its ok for people to scoff and laugh at this kind of thing, but if you look into the misty roots of mankind you'll see that Vastu Shastra, just like Feng Shui, is another part of the art of "separating people from their money."

    These arts can be bring you closer to what the ancient sages called the "state of complete bankruptcy."

    Life is both river and mountain, ocean and sky
    To know life is to be part of life
    Please give me a cheque for the full amount now


    Namaste

  88. I have a friend who does Vastu by abhi_beckert · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine is a Vastu consultant and from what he's told me about it, this is total bullshit. Vastu is primarily about aligning a the energy of a building with the magnetics of the planet and so on, which is impossible to apply to a website.

    1. Re:I have a friend who does Vastu by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Vastu is primarily about aligning a the energy of a building with the magnetics of the planet and so on, which is impossible to apply to a website.

            Some would argue that it's impossible to apply to a building, too.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:I have a friend who does Vastu by theturtlemoves · · Score: 1

      Well, actually, if you model the building as a large quantum particle (oxymoron), you could align the spin against the earth's magnetic field, thus maximizing the energy. ...I should sell that theory and make some oney.

      --
      Empires grow and crumble, and the Turtle Moves. Gods come and go, and still the Turtle Moves. The Turtle Moves.
  89. Tried to find her site... by BeeBeard · · Score: 1

    ...using Google, and the best I could come up with is this. It's an absolutely ugly reddish, brownish, yellowish turd of a web site. Is that the ideal we are supposed to be striving for? Does anybody see the irony in trying to hawk a book about web design using an ugly website?

  90. "Her" ? by C4st13v4n14 · · Score: 0

    Since when do we care what a woman thinks about Slashdot?

  91. Re:Is it all BS? Is Christopher Alexander bullshit by notnAP · · Score: 2, Interesting
    a collective pattern language.


    This phrase summarizes the only real redeaming quality of "sciences" like Feng Shui.

    The truth is, there is no "science" behind these collective wisdoms. But that doesn't mean all of the conclusions derived are by definition wrong. Unscientific and wrong are not the same thing.

    Once upon a time, collective wisdom (in some areas of human civilization) stated that the sun rose every day, carried on the chariot of a God. One could argue that this perception derived from the collective experience of a shared physical observation, the human desire to understand that experience, and the state of human understanding of the world at the time. Many religious beliefs could be seen to have possibly been derived this way.

    Now, a citizen could use that understanding to predict the sun would rise the next day (cloud cover aside). Very unscientific, as the belief Helios was at work was based on very unprovable assumptions. But the prediction could hardly be called wrong.

    Collective wisdom can provide valuable information, even if the method it is arrived at is little more tha trial and error with a folk explanation on top of it. The folk explanation could be seen as being a handed down tag-on from a "knowledgible leader" ages back who capatilized on mankind's need to understand as a means of self promotion.

  92. Vastu is big in India by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    Almost all the blue prints for new building go through a Vastu consultant who makes sagely pronouncements like, "The place to eat should not be in southwest quadrant", "The sleeping quarters should not be directly connected to the entrance" and many other rules. Many Indian owned software companies actually send blueprints to India and get modified by these Vastu experts. One case I know personally the Vastu expert objected to the boardroom door opening from left to right and demanded it be changed. When it opened to the right the door went flush with a wall providing fast access to the room. After the change, after they installed the conf table and chairs, people have to get past the door squeeze between a chair and the end of the door to occupy half the seats in the table. It is dangerous. If there is a fire alarm people cant get out in a hurry. They spent 0.5 million dollars in fees to the expert and to the building owner in modification costs.

    Vastu is not just for the building. My dad would not sleep with his head to the South. Had to completely rearrange the bedroom furniture to accommodate him. If only all the Vastu rules were so easy and painless to implement ...

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Vastu is big in India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, I live in Bangalore and even my hair shampoo is ayurvedic.

  93. Re:You're kidding me right? by LordLucless · · Score: 2, Funny

    Did you use feng shui to determine the aesthetics of your post's punctuation?

    --
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  94. too wide or too long? by holistah · · Score: 1

    First, it says the page is too wide, then, it says the page is too long, making it out of proportion with it's wideness... That simple contradiction alone is what makes me think the analysis is nonsense.

  95. Only white America buys this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    White America buys this crap because they have no culture of their own. Go ahead and ask the average white person where they came from, what are some of their origin's cultural practices, food or langauge of that came from their ancestors. All you'll get is a blank stare. Its because most white people are muts, mixed up so badly they don't know who they are. No wonder they have to resort to stealing other people's culture.

    1. Re:Only white America buys this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not true. This stuff is practiced a lot in the east.
      Re the "stealing" of culture bit... that's what america has always been about. It's a big, huge melting pot of cultures, although not as diverse as I wish it could be (Christianity dwarfs every other religion by a large margin here). Besides, many other cultures are importing american movies, products, music, and the "culture" that comes packaged with it.

  96. I've always thought /. was plain looking . . . by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

    But I don't come here to look at a pretty site, I come here for the articles.

    And the links to pretty site.

    --
    Can I bum a sig?
  97. The very definition of irony by critter42b · · Score: 1

    The cover article of the print issue that contained this was "The New Atheism: No Heaven. No Hell. Just Science. Inside the crusade against religion" - and then they have an article based on some woo-woo bullshit...

  98. WTF by bingo_cannon · · Score: 1

    Vastu Shastra is NOT website shastra. Its for structures only. Its no good using a part of vastushastra [emblems and company] and thus half baked calculations for websites! What next, Aye Karamaba, Abra ka Dabra?

  99. Heh by Mgns · · Score: 1

    From her Website

    "We all know that the five elements that comprise the human and the world are called the "Paanchbhootas".

    Yeah, that's what I call common knowledge

  100. Adblock? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't that grey header the left-over of a blocked ad banner?

    No wonder that slashdot is unbalanced if you remove crucial parts with an adblocker.

  101. Shasta ??? by ch0knuti · · Score: 1

    Er.. shouldn't it be Shastra (sanskrit for education, knowledge)? At least the good doctor should know what she is specializing in ;-)

  102. Re:And like feng shui, IT'S BULLPOOPY! by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Exactly, there is NO science or anything behind it other than someone trying to scam someone who is either undereducated and rich or uninformed and rich out of money. It is the atypical scam and she is simply casting her net wide to see what kind of marks she can zero in on.

    Glad to see India catching up to the scam artists here in the USA. It's a greaat sign they are nearing the end of their prosperity explosive growth and some of the lower moral level people are exploring new ways of keeping money from other countries flowing to thier personal accounts.

    BTW: for 1/3rd the price I will not only do the exact same consultation for you but I will also give you a energy reading for your website and give you a list of the dead that think it appeals to them, Believe me I'm an expert! in fact I'm so much an expert I dont even haveto see your websiteand I already have your analysis finished and ready to download.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  103. The Pot is Black Too? by altek · · Score: 1

    Umm... I wonder what she had to say about Wired's website.... Maybe she couldnt even say anything because she was too busy using a dremel tool on her eyeballs.

    --
    THE MAGIC WORDS ARE SQUEAMISH OSSIFRAGE
  104. Strange disturbance by TheCrayfish · · Score: 1

    Ah, now I know why I feel a strange disturbance in the Force every time I visit Slashdot -- as if a million web designers cried out all at once and then suddenly went silent.

  105. Good Water Flow by DaveWick79 · · Score: 1

    "D: Type and Graphics. The graphics and sans serif font induce good Water flow." Gee, I always wondered why viewing slashdot gave me the irresistable urge to pee.

  106. Evaluating the Evaluation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. "Horizontally elongated layout gives the site too much air..."
      Reset your monitor to 800x600. Feel better now?
    2. "...excellent URL, even though it's confusing when read aloud..."
      THAT'S THE WHOLE POINT! Sheeesh!
    3. The black header is "not auspicious"
      Turn off your adblock. That's a banner.
    4. Type and graphics
      (no comment)
    5. Page should scroll down only two or three screens
      Everyone to her/his own taste, but frequent visitors to a weblog seldom scroll the whole page anyway.
    6. Add graphics to the footer
      Why? To make the page load slower? And most readers never see the footer (see above).
  107. The true source by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

    I believe here we can find the true source of the imbalance on Slashdot!

  108. Re:How about getting those Cows off the Streets fi by Anpheus · · Score: 1

    The 100 on top are to balance the flow of train car.

  109. Goddamn Hippies by Jaysyn · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...Am I the only person here that *likes* the new Slashdot layout?

    Jaysyn

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
  110. Web Pages as Typography... by FFFish · · Score: 1

    ...I spotted a bit of thinking the other day re: treating web page design as typographic design. Most of the web is text, ergo it should be designed to maximally benefit its use, ie. ability to communicate quickly and accurately to the user. Something typography has been fine-tuning for the past several hundred years.

    And it made sense to me.

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  111. We don' need no steenking standards... by mysticgoat · · Score: 3, Funny

    Irrespective of the gender confusion of parent, or the relative merits of using Vastu Shasta in preference to Feng Shui or one of the western astrological website balancing methods, this website designer needs some serious help:

    • 2 CSS errors, such that some elements of the design will not render the way intended
    • over 70 CSS warnings— enough to discourage anyone from taking this website as a serious authority on website implementation
    • total failure to validate under W3C standards-- since the website is not written in standard HTML but in a bastardized variant of HTML issued by HoTMetaL in 1997.

    A website designer needs to be held to a very high standard of compliance. This website designer fails it.

    This post deserves to be modded as very, very funny...

    1. Re:We don' need no steenking standards... by daviddennis · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Now, I think her critique of Slashdot is nonsense -- I would not want the page to be shortened, for example, because I like to see a lot of stories without clicking off to a continuation page.

      That being said, the concepts of Vastu itself are completely unrelated to implementation. She is not calling herself a technical expert on HTML. She is calling herself someone who understands human psychology as it applies to web design, which is at least a potentially interesting idea.

      Personally, I think you web standards guys are way too anal. HTML was originally designed with a very loose syntax, and that's how many people were taught to use it. It takes hours of hard, tedious work to make a site written to the old standards validate, and in the end the site doesn't look any different than it did before.

      For instance, you say this is morally bad:

      <a href = http://amazing.com/>amazing.com</a>

      I say it's much easier to write than

      <a href = "http://amazing.com/">amazing.com</a>

      and far less prone to error, since one of the most common errors is leaving out the trailing quote:

      <a href = "http://amazing.com/>amazing.com</a>

      Why not keep HTML easy for humans to write? Why make it harder to write programs to write HTML, by forcing us to gum things up with quotes when it doesn't make the slightest difference in any browser used today?

      The guy on the street trying to make a living hates web standards and validation because of things like this. I think you would find that there would be much more support for web standards and validation if you didn't make them so unnecessarily anal and only flagged truly ambiguous cases.

      To see hundreds of errors where you said

      <img src = "foo.gif" height = 100 width = 100>

      when you should have said

      <img src = "foo.gif" height = "100" width = "100">

      is just plain silly. The numbers are completely umambiguous unquoted.

      Well, I suppose that was too long an aside, but the point is that HTML is not a programming language and as someone who has been using HTML since 1994 I don't see why it should be thought of one now.

      And I certainly would not criticise someone trying to make a psychological point for HTML problems. I would instead listen to her points and value them entirely independently of the correctness of her HTML. It's in no way important outside of the web standard geek universe.

      Incidentally, I think her page design was ghastly. Attack her on her own turf, and in my opinion you'll be a lot more successful. And that's my point.

      D

    2. Re:We don' need no steenking standards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey dude, drop the " = " for "=", mkay? And shut yer pie hole, standards are swell.

    3. Re:We don' need no steenking standards... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I took a look at her company's page. I don't like it. The colours are fine, but it's in serious need of some zen simplicity.

    4. Re:We don' need no steenking standards... by Espinas217 · · Score: 1

      Oh, please, if your biggest problem validating a site is you don't want to type a pair of quotes then either you are too bored of the things that are really important or you shouldn't be writing any HTML at all. It makes senses, it lets you be sure nothing inside the quotes gets confused with something else, and it's easier for humans and computers to know where the parameter ends and the rest of the code continues.

      --
      La vida no es una pastafrola. :wq
    5. Re:We don' need no steenking standards... by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      But it's completely unambiguous because a space or a > terminate the string, and neither character is legal in a URL.

      And of course numbers are guaranteed never to have space or > in them and so there is never any problem.

      So why quote if you know it's completely unambiguous up front?

      D

    6. Re:We don' need no steenking standards... by mysticgoat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ...the point is that HTML is not a programming language and as someone who has been using HTML since 1994 I don't see why it should be thought of one now.

      Actually, HTML IS a programming language: it is one of the semantic mark-up languages of the SGML family, designed for computerized implementation. I think what you meant is that HTML is not an imperative language like Fortran, Cobol, ..., Perl, or Python. HTML is instead a declarative language, like most other markup languages, or the regex language embedded in Perl. These state what should be done (while an imperative language defines how a procedure is to be done).

      I have been working with HTML since 1995, so you have a year more experience than I do.

      Perhaps because I have less experience, I have had no difficulty with adjusting to the more rigorous requirements of HTML 4.01 Strict, and I very much appreciate the greater power that is now available to me in using CSS and DHTML techniques on my pages. I am currently very interested in the subset of possibilities that are now available with "Ajax" or "Web 2.0" techniques, and I think the need to be a little fussier in using the HTML language correctly is a small price to pay for things like Google Maps and other interactive web pages.

    7. Re:We don' need no steenking standards... by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      One good reason is because it means your web pages are more likely to be in compliance with XML (XHTML). That allows modern modern web crawlers to process your content more accurately, which in turn means that many more people will be able to benefit from the knowledge and wisdom you have put on your pages.

    8. Re:We don' need no steenking standards... by steinnes · · Score: 1

      The quotes are part of the standard for all attribute values.

      This includes the value for the "href" attribute of the anchor (a) tag. Without the quotes a lot of attribute values, notably for the "style" attribute, as well as all the event (onxxxxx) attributes would become hellish to parse -- parse until another keyword known to be an attribute name followed by a equal sign?? Come on, the quotes are there for a reason.

    9. Re:We don' need no steenking standards... by Jonboy+X · · Score: 1
      Why not keep HTML easy for humans to write? Why make it harder to write programs to write HTML, by forcing us to gum things up with quotes when it doesn't make the slightest difference in any browser used today?


      I've got a question for the "hardcore" web designers in the audience: When you want to do a site by hand (as opposed to a visual tool like Dreamweaver or something), would you ever consider using an XML editor like XML Spy or one of the free knockoffs instead of a text editor? It seems like that'd be a great way to keep your quotes closed and your nodes nicely nested. This would also have the side benefit of resulting in XHTML-compliant web sites, which are something everyone can enjoy.
      --

      "In a 32-bit world, you're a 2-bit user. You've got your own newsgroup, alt.total.loser." -Weird Al
    10. Re:We don' need no steenking standards... by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that modern web crawlers in the real world are designed to cope with just about anything. I know that if I wrote one, that's what I would do.

      If you create a web crawler that only accepts valid markup, the only pages it will crawl successfully are the ones about creating valid markup!

      Yes, a slight exaggeration, but I think you get the point.
      D

    11. Re:We don' need no steenking standards... by PapayaSF · · Score: 1
      this website designer needs some serious help

      No kidding! This is the website of "one of India's hottest Web designers"? Forget the coding, the cheesy colors and awkward layout are all you need to condemn it. Is there something in Webvastu that forbids adequate left and right margins for text? And this section on the home page made me laugh:

      How to Order?

      Click here to know how you can order this book.

      ...read

      OK, maybe it's not fair to make fun of their English ability, but purely in terms of Web usability, it's really odd to have the headline be a question and a link, then have a superfluous "Click here" sentence that doesn't have a link (not that I'm advocating "Click here" links), then a "...read" that has another link to the same order page. Plus, there's a seemingly-out-of-place "Buy this book" link at the top of the page. And the book cover doesn't link to the About the Book page or the order page.

      And that's just a two minute review of the home page. Frankly, the design of Slashdot is better (and even better balanced) than her personal site.

      --
      Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
    12. Re:We don' need no steenking standards... by Bogtha · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For instance, you say this is morally bad:

      <a href = http://amazing.com/>amazing.com</a>

      I say it's much easier to write than

      <a href = "http://amazing.com/">amazing.com</a>

      and far less prone to error

      Less prone? It's an error itself! It's equivalent to this code:

      <a href=http:></a>amazing.com/>amazing.com</a>

      If you use a slash in an attribute value, that value must be quoted. It's fallout from the SHORTTAG NET that lets you specify attribute values like "checked" without including a name for the attribute.

      And sorry, if you think leaving out quotes is "much easier", then you must be typing with your nose.

      Why not keep HTML easy for humans to write?

      What's difficult about quoting all values? It's a damn sight easier for newbies than remembering when it's okay and when it isn't okay to skip quoting, based on an obscure part of SGML.

      Why make it harder to write programs to write HTML, by forcing us to gum things up with quotes when it doesn't make the slightest difference in any browser used today?

      And the browsers used tomorrow? You think it's fun going back and fixing dozens of sites when a new browser version comes out because you cut corners? Don't say it won't happen, it's happened for every major browser release in the past ten years.

      And what about non-browsers? Do you know that search engine crawlers won't slip up on your buggy code? Even if you can show that this is the case today, search engines are constantly tweaking their code. I don't want to explain to a client that they aren't in Google because I thought I could cut corners to save myself typing two whole characters.

      Well, I suppose that was too long an aside, but the point is that HTML is not a programming language and as someone who has been using HTML since 1994 I don't see why it should be thought of one now.

      It's got nothing to do with programming. Ever hear Postel's Law? "Be conservative in what you do; be liberal in which you accept from others." Seeing how many bugs you can fit into your markup before your favourite browsers start tripping up on it is not "being conservative in what you do".

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    13. Re:We don' need no steenking standards... by Yusaku+Godai · · Score: 1

      It kind of depends... Working on dynamic web sites, most of the XHTML I write has special template syntax embedded in it. For example, the project I'm currently working on uses ClearSilver templates.

      So I almost never write XHTML just by itself--it's always gummed up with ClearSilver syntax. I doubt an XML editor would take kindly to something like that. It's just that the end result has to be valid XHTML.

      This is the case for much of web design done today.

    14. Re:We don' need no steenking standards... by Bogtha · · Score: 1

      I really don't see much use for specialised XML editors. Despite the protestations of some, it's really not hard at all to keep elements nested properly, close all elements, quote attribute values, etc. It's dead simple stuff that a child could do, especially with syntax highlighting and proper indentation.

      Sure, if you've only ever dabbled with HTML for ten minutes, it might seem like hard work, but once you've spent a few hours writing it, it becomes second nature.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    15. Re:We don' need no steenking standards... by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      I use one of those programs (TextMate for the Mac) to edit my Ruby on Rails code. This is mainly because TextMate makes it easy to maintain the directory structure required by RoR, which would be a horrid pain in emacs.

      Sometimes it makes it easier to balance quotes, and other times it doesn't. If you're modifying code that needs to have quotes added, wen you type your right quote after an object, it often adds another right quote you have to delete (and often forget to).

      Most SGML editors I've seen make it way too clumsy to write code. I can live with TextMate because it imitates some of the emacs editing keystrokes I've memorized over the years. Any tool that doesn't let me use those keystrokes makes me feel enormous pain when editing text.

      D

    16. Re:We don' need no steenking standards... by Inoshiro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "is just plain silly. The numbers are completely umambiguous unquoted."

      When was the last time you wrote a parser? Regex engine? Context free grammar?

      These things exist for a reason. English is hard to process in a computer because it's contextual. Would you argue that removing spacing from English is ok because many ideogram-based languages depend on context to tell you what the correct spacing of a sentence is?

      What is the proper segmentation of "theyouthevent" ? They you the vent? The youth event? The you the vent? What if there were more words? Do you like executing this algorithm (which is O(n^2) at least) every time you get a sentence? What if we decided that context determined sentence length as well?

      You do not know of what you speak. I wish those mods hadn't wasted their points on you, since what you want is a meta-language that can be freely (and slowly) parsed by some interpreter before it generates something that can actually be parsed real time over a (possibly very fast) connection on a network.

      --
      --
      Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    17. Re:We don' need no steenking standards... by Fred_A · · Score: 1
      Oh, please, if your biggest problem validating a site is you don't want to type a pair of quotes... [ ... ]
      What if you haven't got any quotes left and you still have a dozen pages to code and all the typography shops are closed huh ?
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    18. Re:We don' need no steenking standards... by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that modern web crawlers in the real world are designed to cope with just about anything. I know that if I wrote one, that's what I would do.

      If you create a web crawler that only accepts valid markup, the only pages it will crawl successfully are the ones about creating valid markup!

      Since both you and I have to guess at how a modern web crawler (or browser!) is going to deal with the ambiguities inherent in bad markup, I'm pretty sure that it is a far better thing to simply use valid markup, and know for sure how that will be interpreted.

      I'm pretty sure that if I when I've expanded to where I need to hire someone to write my web pages, I'll want someone who writes valid markup. It's not that high a bar. If his pages don't validate, why should I hire him? I wouldn't hire a carpenter who doesn't know how to meet the building codes.

    19. Re:We don' need no steenking standards... by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 1

      "When houses, restauants, shops, shopping centers can be made according to the ancient science of Vastu Shastra then why cann't the Websites also follow the same rules"

      Apparently because websites have writing on them, and buildings do not. Grammar and spelling don't matter to drywall.

    20. Re:We don' need no steenking standards... by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1
      Why not keep HTML easy for humans to write? Why make it harder to write programs to write HTML, by forcing us to gum things up with quotes when it doesn't make the slightest difference in any browser used today?


      One word: AJAX. Lots of people are writing HTML fragments that are then revised or repopulated using DOM methods. I haven't tried, but I'm betting you'll quickly run into trouble trying to stick some content into (say) a span if you've written it as "<span id=foo name=huh>" and try to get a reference to it via document.getElementById("foo"). I recently had to write a page-scraper, and the pages I was working with were a motley mish-mash of styles and conventions accreted over the last seven or eight years. I wound up annotating them so that I could reliably find certain sections I needed in most browsers. If I hadn't had the ability to modify them, I'd have been seriously stuck.

      I'm not some standards-for-standards-sake developer, but if accepted standards exist (and have existed for several years), then I think it's reasonable to expect people writing new code to follow them. I wouldn't accept C (or Java) code that didn't have subordinate code blocks indented, why should I cut HTML coders more slack?
      --
      Just junk food for thought...
    21. Re:We don' need no steenking standards... by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      For over a decade, parsers have successfully figured out URL references and numbers without quotes without any significant difficulty that I know of.

      I don't think there's any place in my writings where I have advocated no use of spaces. In fact, I was flamed for saying "rows = 0" instead of "rows=0" because I find it easier to read in the former way. I guess you can't win.

      It seems to me the world will not collapse if I say "rows = 0" instead of "rows = '0'". I know of no programming language that requires "rows = '0'". In fact, many programming languages will then interpret the 0 as a string and cause an error!

      I have recently written a program that tries to find and complain about "dirty" HTML often caused by people trying to sneak illegal constructs into systems. It became apparent early on that a parser that followed the rules would not work well, because people trying to sneak in "dirty" HTML knew how to trick them. So I wound up writing a program that understands "dirty" HTML as typically written and I think my tool is a lot stronger thanks to it.

      D

    22. Re:We don' need no steenking standards... by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

      Whee! This post is worthy of its own entry in The Daily WTF. I'm sure glad I don't with you.

  112. Perspective: by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

    Hmmm. There's an awful lot of hot air floating around here...

    I was under the impression Slashcode was open source. That being the case, all this lady has to do is fork the code, set up a site and see what survives. If her ideas are not without merit, that's a good thing, everybody gets to enjoy the benefits. Otherwise her theories will be consigned to oblivion.

    Nothing personal, and nothing to get steamed up about.

    1. Re:Perspective: by Simon80 · · Score: 1

      Forking takes technical skills. Accordingly, her website states that she is a "prominent author for many websites", and yet the same page carries the notice "Site Developed by IndiaMART InterMESH Ltd.". Why did she even get the attention of an article?

    2. Re:Perspective: by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, this article (linked from the IIL website), reports that IndiaMART InterMESH has received mixed results from applying the vastu shastra principles to web sites. Three of five sites has reported a 60% increase in the number of hits, but two other sites saw little or no change. I'd guess it wasn't the actual visual redesign that improved hit counts, more likely it was some content updates that improved the search engine rankings of the sites in question, but who knows?

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
  113. uck by NNland · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you, but in my opinion, the author's site (http://www.webvastu.com/) looks like hell. Content boxes that look like google adwords, wide image borders, red backgrounds and white text? I'd say Slashdot looks much better than that.

  114. Priceless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From your link's main page:

    'We all know that the five elements that comprise the human and the world are called the "Paanchbhootas"'

    Priceless!.
    I'm going to scratch my paanchbhootas for a while. Bye. Hugs & kisses. Over

    1. Re:Priceless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just stepped on a paanchbhoota.

  115. Modelling Aesthetics by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    (I haven't seen that Penn and Teller presentation.) IMHO, the key questions are: are there "laws" of aesthetics which can be modelled? Does Feng Shui happen to be (or include) that model?

    If I had to answer the first question, as a scientist, I would probably just poll a whole bunch of people to try to figure out peoples' opinions of a bunch of test cases, and then look for a pattern. And yet, I have a bad feeling about this, because I already know that my polls aren't going to reveal that 99% like this and 1% like that. Everything is going to be so subjective and inconsistent.

    Of course, I haven't actually run the poll. But I've made a prediction about it. Maybe the first step of a scientific investigation is to check my predicition of unpredictability, against an actual poll. ;-)

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  116. Re:You're kidding me right? by nihaopaul · · Score: 1

    nope, but i did encrypt it

  117. Feng shui bleevers are tools by Anomolous+Cowturd · · Score: 1

    See subject.

    --
    Software patents delenda est.
  118. Re:You understand not the truth. Let me guide you. by anagama · · Score: 1

    Ahhh! Many thanks. You are quite right -- speakers were muted. ;-)

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  119. That's creepy by pardasaniman · · Score: 1

    Strange,
    Vastu is my name, Utsav, backwards. Utsav means festival in Hindi.

  120. Already there... by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    In this very discussion already we have blue (water), white (air), and several flamewars, why he think we are not vastu compliant?

  121. I feel dumb? by CheeseTroll · · Score: 1
    We all know that the five elements that comprise the human and the world are called the "Paanchbhootas".

    Well, NOW we do. Thanks for the update!

    --
    A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
  122. This kind of makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually in a way this does make sense, after reading the quick summary photo that lists /.'s "errors" I can see where there's room for improvement. I think what she's aiming at would be to:
    A) I'm not certain how /. could trim down the page width personally I like it the way that it is.
    B) URL is great, but like she says it is confusing. It took me several tries when I was first looking for /. to actually figure out that I needed to spell s-l-a-s-h-d-o-t.
    C) take the Slashdot banner and simply remove the black header altogether (why its so large on her screen grab is beyond me, but I'm using FF so maybe there's a difference?)
    D) She likes the font and graphics so those are cool, apparently not even a comment about the icons being squished
    E) Her complaint about the screen being too long could be fixed simply by shortening the side info bars and making the headlines scroll independently of a fixed set of side links. Tables can do this, I suppose CSS would also work though I've not worked much with CSS.
    F)The footer being a more earthy color, would lend a little bit of balance to the color palette of the site but isn't terrible as is.

    Any ways that's just my $.50

  123. Did someone leave the irony on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Seriously, all crap like this is, is a way to justify stupid expenditures based on some self-riteous asshole's personal opinions.

    Only people with double-digit IQ or a severe case of money poisoning actually listen to these jackasses."

    I just love seeing someone posting mangled grammar and a misspelling of righteous then go on to look 'down' on those with sub average IQs...

  124. Clueless by AncientOfHerb · · Score: 1

    Too bad her website is so fugly... http://www.webvastu.com/index.html

  125. Penn & Teller by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1

    Penn & Teller did a great show covering Feng shui. (It was pretty funny having several experts on the topic independently do their work, and have absoultey zero consistency between them, for a supposed ancience "science.") The name of their series ("BullSh*t"), pretty much sums it up. I expect a lot of the same would apply for this new science of web science beauty...

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  126. Jealous. by GregVernon · · Score: 1

    She is just jealous....

  127. Mystic terms as metaphors by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    I'm seeing a lot of discussion here that really hits home with me, because I'm right now trying to figure out how to deal with mystics. I'm totally nonmystical, nonreligious, etc, but I've gotten myself into a funny situation where I live with a massage therapist that informally practices half a dozen different religions, is full of countless bizarre, pseudoscientific, and mystical beliefs, and who often talks about "energy" in a way that is not one half em vee squared, or power multiplied by time.

    What I have found is that while I am intellectually convinced that it's all bullshit, it is also very clear that she knows something that I don't. When she talks about "energy flowing" from my thoughts, or "EMF" from my computer, it helps to interpret these things as metaphors for things that are real.

    Some examples:

    • EMF. I can turn on my computer and she "feels the EMF" in the next room. I haven't measured the fields around computer, but it's reasonably well-shielded (though I'm sure the CRT makes quite a mess). I'm sceptical that humans have sensory apparatus for detecting EMF fields, but I'm not totally convinced they don't, since sharks, skates, etc (and maybe birds) really have been pretty reliably shown to somehow detect this stuff, so it's not like its biologically impossible. What I do know, though, is that my computer makes sonic noise, even if it seems pretty quiet to me (I'm half deaf from my love of live heavy metal). Maybe "feeling EMF" is really "hearing fans." (If she continues to share my life of enjoying live music, it should be interesting to see if she loses her ability to perceive "EMF", not that I really want her hearing damaged.) I don't know. What I do know, is she can tell if my computer is on or off. "EMF" is, at worst, a metaphor for whatever she detects. At best, it's exactly accurate.
    • Mind reading. I can be standing behind her where she can't see me, start to think intense sexual thoughts, and she shudders and grins. "I felt your energy." Ok, whatever. Sometimes I think "energy" really is energy in the form of heat. Sometimes I wonder if it's pheromes. (It's not just sexual; it's a part of every single personal interaction she has with any person, all day long.) Whatever. It's something, and she really detects it. "Energy" is, at worst, a metaphor for whatever she detects. And, at best, it's exactly accurate.
    • Feng Shui. I've always held this idea with particular distaste. She, on the other hand, uses it. The house is layed out the way she wanted it, but there's one back room that is "all mine" where I set up some bookshelves, computer desk, etc, to my instinct. Guess what happened? The room ended up being treated as though it had "bad juju" or something. People were unhappy, and didn't want to visit me there. I was getting unhappy too. She made some suggestions and I moved some things, and everyone was happier including me. Does that mean I bought into the mysticism? No, but perhaps it does mean that I'm not the most aesthetically gifted person in the house, and that's something I can believe. Do aesthetic issues have an effect on our psychologies? Of-fucking-course they do!

    You don't have to buy into mysticism to know that some people are sensitive to things you aren't. There is a whole world happening under my nose that I know nothing about, and even if it's not faeries and dragons and psychic rays, doesn't mean it's nonexistent or fraud, either. So when someone starts talking about a website's "vastu," don't worry about their terminology or the goofy models. Just listen to their suggestions, maybe try them out, and see if it works. If it turns out that they're right, and you're curious how they knew what to change, then maybe abstract away their terminology as metaphors for concepts that you don't know about (yet). Then try to learn those

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    1. Re:Mystic terms as metaphors by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1
      What I have found is that while I am intellectually convinced that it's all bullshit, it is also very clear that she knows something that I don't. When she talks about "energy flowing" from my thoughts, or "EMF" from my computer, it helps to interpret these things as metaphors for things that are real.


      I'd mod you +5 insightful if I could.

      You're right. From a pure scientific standpoint, the models are goofy. But you know what? It works.

      What I do know, though, is that my computer makes sonic noise, even if it seems pretty quiet to me


      Good guess, but no. I can detect the EMF as well. It's not noise. It's detectable even in a computer with a LCD flat panel in one of those 'quiet' cases. There's still some sonic noise (hard drives spinning, power supply, fan, etc.) but it's not the noise.

      You can probably detect the EMF as well. Do this: Sit in front of your PC with your eyes closed and tune out your thoughts... just try to sense what's around you. Spin around in the chair. This works even better if you get ear plugs, too. Now walk into a building you've never been in, but you know has a server room -- try to prearrange access to this server room. Try to 'feel' where the server room is. The results of this experiment will surprise you. (Change the details as appropriate for your scenario...the 'server room in a building' -- it just works for me because I'm a computer consultant -- it could be a friends house who has a number of PCs that you've never seen)

      Mind reading. I can be standing behind her where she can't see me, start to think intense sexual thoughts, and she shudders and grins. "I felt your energy." Ok, whatever. Sometimes I think "energy" really is energy in the form of heat.


      This concept of 'energy' is an ancient one and has nothing to do with the relatively young science of physics, at least not until you get into quantum physics, which posits that everything is made up of energy and that the observer has an effect on what is observed.

      Do yourself a favor. Get yourself a copy of the movie "What the Bleep Do We Know?". They have it on Netflix. If you have any questions after that watching that video, you know where to find me.

  128. Black header by Baldrake · · Score: 1
    "C: 'The black header is not auspicious...'"
    Yeah, sucks to Malda for making the site ugly for us Adblock users!
  129. We need steenking standards! by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 1

    Well, even though spaces are not technically legal in a URL, there's no actual reason to encode them in a URL, because space has no special meaning when parsing a URL, unlike [:/?&=%#+]

    Also, URLs are not the only things inside HTML attributes. What about alt tags for images? Those often have spaces.

    HTML was designed to be loose to encourage adoption... which worked! But now we are stuck with a good deal of broken HTML and browsers that have to do a lot of guesswork, which leads to MORE platform incompatibilities. The more regular and consistent a language is, the less errors you are going to have. Period. Things like missing quotes can be detected by the parser and are easy to fix.

    I think Firefox needs to start popping up warning dialogs for bad HTML.

    Now, I completely disagree that a web designer - a visual/interaction designer - should have to know all the ins and outs of all the standards. That's why you have web production people. They are two completely separate disciplines (well, three, visual and interaction design are quite different from each other).

    -If

    --
    Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
    1. Re:We need steenking standards! by suggsjc · · Score: 1
      I think Firefox needs to start popping up warning dialogs for bad HTML.
      There is already something out there HTML Validator that does pretty much just that.

      However, that isn't that useful for users since its the site owners that actually need to take notice. What *could* actually be good is instead of firefox popping up a message, it should send an email to the webmaster. The email could be informative in that it would let them know the errors, but give them insight into why fixing them could/should be a priority. There are probably a lot of webmaster that just don't understand the benefits of having good standardized code (like better search engine rankings).
      --
      When I have a kid, I want to put him in one of those strollers for twins and then run around the mall looking frantic.
    2. Re:We need steenking standards! by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 1

      I was actually thinking of something built-in that the user will see. Sort of like the banners at the top that say that a pop-up was blocked, or that there's a plug-in required for this page... Have one with a warning exclamation point icon that says this site contains broken HTML. You want something that's not really annoying to users, but looks REALLY unprofessional.

      It would have to be built-in and turned on by default, and companies would have to care enough about Firefox for it to matter - so maybe we aren't there yet...

      -If

      --
      Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
  130. but I'm wrong by don.g · · Score: 1

    and of course, half-remembered first year philosophy augmented with skimread wikipedia has its downfalls. modus tollens (if a then b; !b; therefore, !a) is valid. I was thinking of the (if a then b; b; therefore, a) form, which is invalid, and what I first wrote before deciding to check if it was correct :P

    --
    Pretend that something especially witty is here. Thanks.
  131. Penn and Teller called it... by Original+Replica · · Score: 1

    ... Bullshit. Besides anyone can see that the silver, blue, grey, and white color theme/ page layout is remeniscient of Star Trek TNG and is therefore soothing and assuring to /.'s target audience.

    --
    We are all just people.
  132. Re:What can hurt business is a technical site that by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

    A) agree.

    B) I disagree -- a site with an URL of "http://www.ibm.com/developer" is much more appealing to me at a deep level than "http://www.ibm.com/checkurl?id=sdafwerud23432&sit eid=ibm&location=canada&user=12315asdfasdggfdjsdfg &destination=developer"

    C) Yellow sucks -- its the most apparent colour to the human eye, so use it sparingly or appropriately. Her own website gave me a headache looking at the title bar.

    D) Graphically, depends on your audience. I think Slashdot could use a little spice in the background graphics and such (not where the text is, but in between). Several good CSS demos (CSS Zen garden for example) show how to do this tastefully.

    E) Scrolling sucks, but its necessary. Do your users prefer scrolling or clicking? Do whichever makes them happier. Offer a copy of each and see which one people use more. Try iframes and such, etc.

    F) Footers get ignored by most people, period.

    --
    - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  133. Ooh.. by mudeth · · Score: 1

    The process entails mapping page attributes - HTML, colors, graphics - to elements like fire, water, and air. 'Any disturbance of these established elements can cause an imbalance in the site that directly affects its business,' Narang says.

    Ah! That explains why her site has all the hits, and the millions reading it every single day and commenting and fighting about posts and reviews. Slashdot business, on the other hand, is doing bad. So bad that they have to take orders for articles by individual e-mail.
  134. Slashdot needs balance? by BozoForPresident · · Score: 1

    I'm a western yobbo and even I knew that.

  135. Vastu Shastra is UGLY. by Tolkien · · Score: 1

    I don't know if she designed this website, but if that's her vision of perfect design, God help us all. http://www.webvastu.com/

  136. Feng Shui works by microbox · · Score: 1

    "While the explanations claiming "energies" for Feng Shui may not be correct, the human psychology behind it is."

    Yeah. There's a sucker born every minute.

    The mind is affected by the relative world. Or perhaps you'd behave the same if you walked into a beautifully designed church as opposed to a toxic waste dump. AFAIK, the principles of Feng Shui are all about the relationship of the mind with the environment, and that that relationship exists is extremely obvious.

    The problem is, I DO understand it.

    Ha ha! Shouting at stupid people to make them understand.

    btw, Feng Shui takes many years of discipline to understand. One must have a stable mind and a keen appreciation of subtleties and ascetics, and a deep understanding of the human mind and it's facets. Such people are generally kind and tactful, and generally don't presume to know things that they don't (that's called pride, which is related to earth), nor yell about them either (that's anger, related to water). I believe that understanding the nature of pride/anger and their relationship to the mind is part of understanding Feng Shui. Extraordinarly smart people spend decades trying to understand the nature of their own mind and emotions, and according to recent scientific research into the nature of happiness, they are easily the happiest people on this earth.

    This is why I call it like I see it. Bullshit. First to last.

    I live at a complex in the country that was designed by a Feng Shui expert, and it rocks. No really, it's beautiful, and people say so who visit. For us, hiring the Feng Shui consultant was an excellent investment.

    First to last??? Perhaps you've never visited such a place???

    --

    Like all pain, suffering is a signal that something isn't right
  137. Oh yeah? by SideshowBob · · Score: 1

    Slashdot is just an electronic version of a bulletin board, which has centuries of history in the western world. You know, the people that invented the printing press?

    (half joking, but I'm definitely 100% sick of people trying to start fads like this in order to hawk overpriced services and 'consulting')

  138. Haha, what? by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    That's rich. Feng Shui has nothing to do with aesthetics. It's hit or miss whether it can achieve that goal or not. It certainly doesn't specifically try to optimize anything that we can identify as being aesthetically pleasing or not; part of that might be in the interpretation of the "sacred rules" through the eyes of what amounts to be an interior designer. It's his or her aesthetic sense coming out (which is probably going to be shitty since he or she can't cut it as the real thing) and they couch it in Feng Shui or Vastu or whatever Eastern crap to justify their decisions.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
    1. Re:Haha, what? by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      Aesthetics is not just the practice of making things more "pleasing." Consider the origin of the term - and its relationship to the word "anaesthetic." It is about the effect of an artifact or of the environment on the person en toto, not just whether it "looks nice." It is as much a question of the qualia of life - the very feeling of things - as one of representations and formal relations.

      Feng shui and such are couched in metaphysics that are pre-modern, but they survive because they are a working model of aesthetic experience.

  139. Yuck. XML Spy. by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    Now, if you need to do something fancy with XML (like, apply a transformation, or build/test an XPath expression) and you don't have much experience with it, I can see the value of XML Spy. But for writing an XML document with a schema that I'm familiar with? I'd rather use Programmer's Notepad or something.

    I like nano and vim in Unix, as well as gEdit. (Really, gEdit is nice for a GUI editor, you should try it).

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  140. Hmm... Wasn't There Another Book That Answers Why? by warbirdnut · · Score: 1

    "When houses, restauants, shops, shopping centers can be made according to the ancient science of Vastu Shastra then why cann't the Websites also follow the same rules" Hmmm.. Seems like I remember a book that answers this question. http://www.amazon.com/Web-Pages-That-Suck-Looking/ dp/078212187X/ref=pd_sim_b_1/002-7345104-9047259

  141. Vastu shastra confirms it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vastu shastra confirms it, Slashdot is dying!

  142. web vastu is pretty fucking ugly by sashang · · Score: 1

    This site is nothing appealling - http://www.webvastu.com/. Brown and yellow is ugly and the gradient shading makes it feels tacky.

    1. Re:web vastu is pretty fucking ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like they've revamped the site heh

  143. Somebody's gotta say it ... by Rudisaurus · · Score: 1

    She must be new here.

    --
    licet differant, aequabitur
  144. For printing too by phorm · · Score: 1

    Unless you're a fan of "print... [next page]... print... [next page]... etc"

  145. The biggest BS news ever by sr3d · · Score: 1

    First of all, I do web design almost for a living. So I will pretend that I know a thing or two.

    No visitors and you have to rely on Fenshui and Vastu to lure them? WTF? This smells like total bullshit all over the place. It also spells R I D I C U L O U S

    If you want to attract more users, do the followings

    • advertising well. Everything now needs marketting.
    • nice site with good looking graphics, just don't get too flashy. But wait, myspace site doesn't even look nice and the flashing ads already make me half-blind. Maybe there's something more...
    • GOOD CONTENTS. I don't come to Slashdot to study design or page layout. I come to slashdot to read. I ain't coming to a porn site to see how the CSS and the cool AJAX works. I ain't coming to wikipedia without making some stuff up along the way and do some vandalism (just kidding btw). Got milk?
    • Something to give the users, like ... free ipods.
    • Do some serious users studies (crazyegg.com, or the new google thingy). I wonder why Nielsen Media Research are still making billions but for sure they don't rely on Fengshui OR the Vastu crap: "Give me $100 million for the study, our fenshui books told us your site is a piece of crap so users don't return to it."
    • Not using the colors (#D5E191 and #EBF8AC to be exact) that are used in the webvastu.com site because those colors are pretty dull and if you ever get on slashdot, your ass will be raped so many times with rofl comments.
    • get your site slashdotted. that will surely help.

    In this age of science and yet the fact that this "Dr." woman caught on popular is an amazing indication that some CxO guys are extremely, sorry, stupid.

    So here's something from Buddhism: karma - cause and effect. If you follow this woman's "advices", your site will soon be vanished. Don't blame the media for popularizing her, blame your stupidity to listen to bullshitter.

    Sorry for the bad language, it's late (2:33AM) and I am trying to be as critical as possible.

    --
    http://www.alexle.net