Slashdot Mirror


First Company Logo Visible From Space

Albert Sandberg writes, "KFC (Kentucky Fried Chicken) has created the first logo that is visible from space. The construction was made by 65,000 1x1-foot tiles and covers about 2 acres. The logo was built and assembled over about a month and is located in the Nevada desert near Area 51. The article also has a short video showing the construction in time-lapse. Now the aliens know where to get their slimy food :-)"

436 comments

  1. That's a bad idea... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Funny

    KFC = Klingon Fried Crispy

    1. Re:That's a bad idea... by ParraCida · · Score: 5, Funny

      And now when an alien civilization takes pictures from outer space and discover 'the face on earth' they will know for absolutely sure that there is no intelligent life on this planet.

    2. Re:That's a bad idea... by hacksaw5150 · · Score: 3, Funny

      The only thing I can say is that this is one of the most depressing days of my life.

      I'm speechless. :(

    3. Re:That's a bad idea... by jazman_777 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Lionel Barrymore played a wonderful Kentucky Colonel opposite Shirley Temple's "Little Colonel." I try to recall that anytime I see the KFC logo.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    4. Re:That's a bad idea... by Zonk+(troll) · · Score: 2, Informative

      But they will now it can shred.

      --
      "The Federal Reserve is a fraudulent system."--Lew Rockwell
      End The FED. -
    5. Re:That's a bad idea... by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Funny

      But they will now it can shred.

      Is this English?

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    6. Re:That's a bad idea... by jazman_777 · · Score: 1

      The words are, but the sentence isn't.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    7. Re:That's a bad idea... by Pinkfud · · Score: 5, Funny

      Drat! I've been saving white tiles for 20 years to build a giant toilet. Now these guys steal my thunder with a Colonel Panic.

      --
      The world is my oyster. That's why it's always in a stew.
    8. Re:That's a bad idea... by Zonk+(troll) · · Score: 1, Interesting
      I accidentally left out a K. Here it is, corrected:

      But they will know it can shred.


      In case you don't follow the link, it's about Buckethead. He's an awesome guitar player. He wears a white mask and a Kentucky Fried Chicken bucket. Take a look at his picture in the Wikipedia link.

      As for the word, shred, here is a definition:


      Shred
      1. To play distorted electric lead guitar in a manner which is at once so extremely cogent and rapid that listener experiences the sensation that the production of the sound should be impossible or nearly impossible.
      2. The art of Technically and rhythmically hammering out amazing and lightning-fast solos on a guitar.


      Source: Urban Dictionary

      --
      "The Federal Reserve is a fraudulent system."--Lew Rockwell
      End The FED. -
    9. Re:That's a bad idea... by Ergasiophobia · · Score: 1

      It's slang, he's talking about playing the guitar.

    10. Re:That's a bad idea... by webmistressrachel · · Score: 1

      Read the Wikipedia article. It's mildly amusing because he won some guitar shredding award (8th place).

      --
      This tagline was transcoded to result in at least one smirk. If you experience failure to smirk, please consult your Gen
    11. Re:That's a bad idea... by diersing · · Score: 1

      There is no denying, not matter what life form you assume, the undeniable draw of a bucket of extra crispy. If you get it the right part of town, you can get spicy hot as well.

    12. Re:That's a bad idea... by fastgood · · Score: 1
      The word "fried" disappeard from the human race back in the 1990s.

      Churches Fried Chicken became Churches Chicken, Kentucky Fried became KFC, Popeyes ...

      Even Google has an alien search results page for the subject.

    13. Re:That's a bad idea... by AndyAndyAndyAndy · · Score: 1

      Consider all the that could have been, had those plates been photovoltaic cells, or mirrors for a solar plant, instead of an ugly, shameless scar on the Earth.

      --
      It's always confirmation bias!
    14. Re:That's a bad idea... by Centurix · · Score: 1

      Here in Brisbane, it's Kentucky Fried Children

      --
      Task Mangler
    15. Re:That's a bad idea... by gutnor · · Score: 2, Funny

      Here in London, a friend from a country still untouched by the "3 pieces Colonel's Meal ",
      asked me what the K was for in "K-something Fish and Chips"

    16. Re:That's a bad idea... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I've always referred to it as Kentucky Duck.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    17. Re:That's a bad idea... by X3J11 · · Score: 1

      Far more... "amusing"... I suppose, is Big B's ability to play. In spite of his oddities, the man can really play guitar.

      Some Google video links:
      http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-8257543090 317674873 Hhighly recommended!)

      http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-1670373061 414362975 Brief, 1m long video clip. The song is "Nottingham Lace", and used to be freely available online. It's not at the link on Buckethead's site http://www.bucketheadland.com/, but I've mirrored it http://www.amindlost.com/nottingham_lace.mp3. Be gentle, I have a limited bandwidth =)

      YouTube and Google Video are both good sites for finding Buckethead vids, and as far as I know (don't quote me here), Buckethead has a pretty generous policy regarding fans swapping bootlegs of his live concerts. There used to be a site that had a massive list of bootlegged concert recordings going back several years, but I can't seem to find the location of it. Popular BT sites should have a few up, although I've seen people posting his commercial discs too.

    18. Re:That's a bad idea... by LindseyJ · · Score: 1

      How rediculously sentimental of you.

    19. Re:That's a bad idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could see it now....
      Martin the Martin: The earthings have very ugly sign. Very, very ugly sign. And that sign blocks my view of Venus so I need to blow that sign up.

    20. Re:That's a bad idea... by jtwronski · · Score: 4, Funny
      the undeniable draw of a bucket of extra crispy


      My wife calls them "Matrix Chickens", and claims that KFC grows them in a warehouse without heads or feet. The cut-off neck and legs are used to inject whatever hormones and nutrition needed to grow the "chicken" body. I'm not sure if thats exactly how it happens, but I ate at a KFC not too long ago, and something is seriously wrong with their food. She's on to something. Video at 11 :)
    21. Re:That's a bad idea... by scum-e-bag · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Why is this a slashdot story??? It's a complete load of marketing bullocks... I can already see my car from space... google-earth anyone???

      The editors must smoking crack again...

      --
      Does it go on forever?
    22. Re:That's a bad idea... by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      Kentucky fried fingers. They're chicken lik'n good!

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    23. Re:That's a bad idea... by supertoad · · Score: 2, Informative

      yeah, i think there's plenty more logos than that visible from space. like this one http://www.masteroni.com/show.php?itemId=12203175

    24. Re:That's a bad idea... by Da_Weasel · · Score: 1

      Can I shoot myself now?

      --
      If you must!
    25. Re:That's a bad idea... by wolf369T · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, they raise them at Area 51 and they build the billboard near...

    26. Re:That's a bad idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Snoped You wife will believe anything.

    27. Re:That's a bad idea... by Gwwfps · · Score: 1

      Kind of reminds me of this....

    28. Re:That's a bad idea... by Greeneemer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What is the definition of "Visible From Space" anyways? I can see my house on Google Earth, does that make my house "Visible From Space" too?

      --
      ...i think
    29. Re:That's a bad idea... by rtyall · · Score: 1

      Ok, so you can see that Maxim from space, but how'd you turn the pages?

    30. Re:That's a bad idea... by Nuskrad · · Score: 3, Informative

      You are aware that most Google Earth images are from aerial photographs and not orbiting satellites?

    31. Re:That's a bad idea... by gsslay · · Score: 2, Informative
      I can already see my car from space... google-earth anyone???

      You are under the common misconception that everything on Google-Earth is a satellite photo. The photographs that features your car were taken from a plane.

    32. Re:That's a bad idea... by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      Here in London, a friend from a country still untouched by the "3 pieces Colonel's Meal ",

      No it's not. The infestation may not have gone as far as in the US, but there certainly are KFCs in the UK.

    33. Re:That's a bad idea... by gutnor · · Score: 1

      I meant: I'm in London, my friend came from Belgium.

    34. Re:That's a bad idea... by Down_in_the_Park · · Score: 1
      --
      "People who are willing to sacrifice essential freedoms for security deserve neither freedom nor security."

      B F
    35. Re:That's a bad idea... by Himring · · Score: 1

      It made more sense without the k....

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    36. Re:That's a bad idea... by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      "My wife calls them "Matrix Chickens", and claims that KFC grows them in a warehouse without heads or feet."

      Are you by any chance married to Margaret Atwood? Her book _Oryx and Crake_ features just such a critter, the Chickie-Knob.

    37. Re:That's a bad idea... by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      According to every source I was able to find, Google Earth's imagery comes from both satellite photos AND aerial photographs.

      'Course, I found those sources by Googling, so maybe Google planted them all ;)

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    38. Re:That's a bad idea... by Technomonics · · Score: 1

      Nahh, what they are doing is using stem cells to grow the individual pieces that they sell, therefore eliminating the need to cut and disect a "vital and honorable chicken" in the process. Chicken embryos seem to be much more plentiful and no one raises a stink aboutusing them. In fact, this morning I had two with a side of bacon.

    39. Re:That's a bad idea... by X3J11 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I found that about 15m after I hit the Submit button to my post. ;)

      If you're gonna grab one of 'em, I recommend the 2006-09-17 recording at The Majestic Theater. Nice mix of songs, and the quality's pretty good. #6, in particular (Soothsayer). Probably the best song (IMHO) off his new album, Crime Slunk Scene.

    40. Re:That's a bad idea... by mapmaker · · Score: 1
      What is the definition of "Visible From Space" anyways?

      "Visible from space" is another one of those "Libraries of Congress"-type phrases the popular press likes to use. Individual people are visible from space with current spy satellite technology. The phrase originally referred to things that astronauts in orbit could see with the naked eye, but today it just kind of means "something pretty big".

    41. Re:That's a bad idea... by Nuskrad · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the satellite photos are only the low detail images when your zoomed out. Anything you can see a car or small building on is going to be an aerial photo. I believe that a lot of the Satellite images used are from the Landsat Program - check out their website to see the level of detail

    42. Re:That's a bad idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read all this stuff, went to their web site to check out the new logo and advertising campaign (also signed the petition to put Colonel Sanders on a postage stamp), and then went to my local KFC to pick up dinner. When I got back home, I discovered I had been shorted one piece of chicken, and the ones I had were Original Recipe instead of the Extra Crispy I had requested. They may do chicken right, but now they need to do ORDERS right!

      Too bad the Colonel isn't still around -- maybe he'd kick a few butts.

    43. Re:That's a bad idea... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      If you think that's bad, a guy who owes me a $100 works at the local store. I keep telling him I wanted cold cash and not leftover drumsticks.

  2. Time Lapse? by LogicX · · Score: 1

    Could you please specify where this time-lapse video is?

    --
    May this post be indexed by spiders, and archived for all to see as my Internet epitaph.
    1. Re:Time Lapse? by bunions · · Score: 2, Informative

      uh, in TFA? About 3/4 of the way down?

      --
      there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
    2. Re:Time Lapse? by LogicX · · Score: 1

      Holy cached page.

      I was there earlier today, it wasn't there, and it didn't reload it from the server when I went just now.
      doh!

      --
      May this post be indexed by spiders, and archived for all to see as my Internet epitaph.
    3. Re:Time Lapse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cant be bothered to download it and its not on google earth yet.

      Could somebody walk out to area 51 and tell me what the space picture looks like.

      A digital cameraphone photo would be good too.

      Thanks.

  3. Kodos... by ral315 · · Score: 1

    Kodos wants Honey BBQ Wings!

  4. Aw, crap! by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 1

    It's just a stupid fast food joint, and a giant Mario head made up of throngs of NES players chanting "Mario! Mario!"

    --
    N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
  5. oblig by Philotic · · Score: 2, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new fried chicken overlords.

    1. Re:oblig by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I, for one, welcome our new finger licking good fried chicken overlords.

      fixed.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, DON'T welcome our new GNAA overlords. =P

    3. Re:oblig by nametaken · · Score: 2, Interesting

      :(

      I know I don't have to see it, but somehow this bothers me. Something about my planet being a fucking galactic billboard... but I can't quite pin it down.

  6. The Wicked Witch of Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wouldn't cry if someone dropped a space station on it.

    1. Re:The Wicked Witch of Marketing by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

      I think it's a wonderful plan! Anyone who's planning on decommissioning your space station in the next couple months, please try to aim it at the sign; perhaps we can finagle some free chicken out of them.

  7. Great by dedazo · · Score: 5, Funny

    So the aliens will locate us by tracking down Hitler's speeches, and when they get here they'll see the KFC logo. I guess they'll cap it off by landing in Darfur. First impressions are so important...

    --
    Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    1. Re:Great by kfg · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just so we're all perfectly clear on this point; I did not have anything to do with it.

      KFG

    2. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, we're quite aware you're too busy posting on slashdot to do anything worthwhile.

    3. Re:Great by kfg · · Score: 1

      we're quite aware you're too busy posting on slashdot to do anything worthwhile.

      Now you're just being silly. I game too.

      KFG

    4. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, all we have to do is send someone up to their mothership in the captured alien saucer from Area 51. Purpose? No, not to plant a virus, but find out what the linkie is to their Main Computer...so it can be posted on /. They'd be toast.

    5. Re:Great by Himring · · Score: 1

      Love the hitler comment. I guess they'll see colonel sander's head and think, "look. It's him. Bro's sprouted a tee...."

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    6. Re:Great by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 0

      Maybe he just types really fast?

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    7. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's always good to have a sense of humor in the face of, um, anonymous cowards.

    8. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. This is why I like KFG. Thankfully, he doesn't seem to get fed up with ACs.

  8. It's so all alien visitors will know... by dafragsta · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... that we all taste just like chicken.

    1. Re:It's so all alien visitors will know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually. Human meat tastes like pork (but I do like the Beavis quote: "Tastes Like Chicken!! heh heh")

      Robot Identifies Human Flesh As Bacon. and I seem to recall some stuff on cannibalism I read once upon a time that said the same thing. Many years ago I also read a text file on how to get choice bacon cuts from a human, but that was more for the shock and curiousity value. I'm a vegetarian.

    2. Re:It's so all alien visitors will know... by frdmfghtr · · Score: 1
      Many years ago I also read a text file on how to get choice bacon cuts from a human, but that was more for the shock and curiousity value. I'm a vegetarian.


      Was that before or after reading about choice bacon cuts?
      --
      Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
    3. Re:It's so all alien visitors will know... by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      You should stop dating pigs, dude.

    4. Re:It's so all alien visitors will know... by dhanes · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The Indonesians apparently have a word for man (I'm sorry I can't come up with a link, I was told this by someone who taught Silat.) that basically means 'long pig'.

      Ever wonder why canabalism is considered so bad, why Jewish rules forbid pork, and why the saturated fats from pork products are so bad for humans? I've wondered that if human meat tastes like pork, and since humans and pigs are anatomically/physiologically close to each other one of the reasons canabalism is so horrible is that the ingestion of human meat is at least as bad or worse than pork.

      Disgusting Food for Thought.

      Disclaimer:) I do like bacon, prosciutto and chinese pork/chicken sausages. After thinking about the above though, I do try to limit the amount of pork that my family eats.

      --
      Wait, What?
    5. Re:It's so all alien visitors will know... by ThJ · · Score: 1

      Actually, according to a mid-20th century account, human tastes like veal.

    6. Re:It's so all alien visitors will know... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I went to look up Long Pork on wikipedia, and it redirects to cannibalism. I heard once in high school that another name for human flesh was long pork. I guess that's because it tastes like pork, although I don't think I'd ever want to test that.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    7. Re:It's so all alien visitors will know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hey Hannibal, your blog is broken.

      Fatal error: Call to undefined function input_name_to_filter() in /home/staff/thor/www/thj.no/blog/include/compat.in c.php on line 99

      BTW, eating people is not nice!
    8. Re:It's so all alien visitors will know... by rark · · Score: 1

      Our robot overlords would have you know that we taste like bacon and prosciutto.

    9. Re:It's so all alien visitors will know... by bob65 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps that's why we tend to find unseasoned pork "stinkier" than other meats. Because it tastes like ourselves?

    10. Re:It's so all alien visitors will know... by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 1

      So let me get this straight the robots think we taste like pork and cheese and the aliens think we taste like chicken. Let's face it guys and gals, we're doomed!

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
    11. Re:It's so all alien visitors will know... by SoulRider · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought we tasted like pork!

  9. KFC's new employee manual... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... is titled How to Serve Man

    1. Re:KFC's new employee manual... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoops, sorry...
      that should have been To Serve Man (without the "How")
      It's been a while since I've seen that Twilight Zone episode (or read the Damon Knight short story).

    2. Re:KFC's new employee manual... by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 1

      The short story was good. it was the first "ebook" I bought... back in like... 2001 or 2002, I think.

      well, I purchased a non-rights managed PDF. cost me like 2.50$ if I recall correctly.

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
  10. Let's define VISIBLE as naked eye visible by way2trivial · · Score: 5, Insightful

    if I can see my backyard from google maps.. that's (ahem) [B] VISIBLE FROM SPACE [/B]

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:Let's define VISIBLE as naked eye visible by chroot_james · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It's interesting that dictionary.com says libertine means sexually free OR free of religion, as though the two are interchangeable.

      --
      Reality is nothing but a collective hunch.
    2. Re:Let's define VISIBLE as naked eye visible by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree, because I've seen store logos that were clearly ment to be seen from planes in Google Earth. Like the massive Target at lat 40.783780 lon -73.833376

      By the way, does anyone know how big that Taco Bell logo was? You know, the giant one that Taco Bell said they'd give everyone in America a free taco if a piece of the Mir station hit it?

      --
      Demented But Determined.
    3. Re:Let's define VISIBLE as naked eye visible by DeadChobi · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps one and the same?

      --
      SRSLY.
    4. Re:Let's define VISIBLE as naked eye visible by kd5ujz · · Score: 2, Informative

      40' by 40' (~12.19 meters square)

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
    5. Re:Let's define VISIBLE as naked eye visible by StikyPad · · Score: 5, Informative

      Link to the Target, for the lazy.

    6. Re:Let's define VISIBLE as naked eye visible by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >if I can see my backyard from google maps.. that's (ahem) [B] VISIBLE FROM SPACE [/B]

      I've seen Google Earth pictures where you can make out clusters of pigeons, individual people, vehicles
      no bigger than motorcycles, etc.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    7. Re:Let's define VISIBLE as naked eye visible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Florida Disney has a Mickey Mouse Head that covers more than 3.5 acres. It has been there for at least the past decade.

      28.396202
      -81.578051

    8. Re:Let's define VISIBLE as naked eye visible by Zencyde · · Score: 1

      40x40 feet. Another poster posted a link to it for some reason.

      --
      What day is it? Could you please tell me?
    9. Re:Let's define VISIBLE as naked eye visible by alta · · Score: 1

      Apparently people in florida can't make a straight road to save their lives. Heck, I'm in Alabama, I10 going through pensacola has been under constructions since I was 10 (19.95 years ago)

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    10. Re:Let's define VISIBLE as naked eye visible by NovaSupreme · · Score: 0

      Doesnt space mean 100km from earth? google map may show photos taken by 40k feet planes.

    11. Re:Let's define VISIBLE as naked eye visible by internewt · · Score: 1

      Have a look at Las Vegas. I think that's one of the places with the highest res images currently. People are visible, to the level of detail that their shadow is visible "with legs", as it were.

      --
      Car analogies break down.
    12. Re:Let's define VISIBLE as naked eye visible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet they have a big problem with bird feces....

    13. Re:Let's define VISIBLE as naked eye visible by EZLeeAmused · · Score: 2

      But....don't naked eyes in space freeze or explode or something equally unpleasant?

      --
      Some see the vessel as half full; others see it as half-empty; We pour it out on the floor and laugh
    14. Re:Let's define VISIBLE as naked eye visible by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      That huge target logo that you referred to is on the roof of a Target in Queens right by LaGuardia airport - so kind of makes sense to put it there, that's an awful lot of planes going right by it on their approach vectors.

    15. Re:Let's define VISIBLE as naked eye visible by zotz · · Score: 1

      Yes, but will google blur out the logo? Unless the colonel pays of course.

      all the best,

      drew
      http://www.ourmedia.org/node/262954
      Drop by and read the novel I am writing. (copyleft type license)
      Or come to ##zotz on irc.freenode.net and watch it being written.
      Till the end of Nov 2006.

      --
      FreeMusicPush If you want to see more Free Music made, listen to Free
    16. Re:Let's define VISIBLE as naked eye visible by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      ShoeMart logo near Manila airport:
      http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&q=40.783780, +-73.833376&ie=UTF8&z=17&ll=40.783775,-73.833382&s pn=0.005687,0.013561&t=h&om=1

      The KFC thing is probably a bit bigger, but putting logos on buildings doesn't seem that uncommon. Sticking it in the middle of the desert is more of a publicity stunt, which worked.

    17. Re:Let's define VISIBLE as naked eye visible by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      Happy 30th :)

    18. Re:Let's define VISIBLE as naked eye visible by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      Target has a few of those -- I believe there's another one in Chicago on the landing approach to O'Hare.

      This one's on the approach to LaGuardia in NYC (on a completely unrelated note, if you look on the map, it's surrounded almost entirely by water, making it a rather unnerving landing as a passenger)

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    19. Re:Let's define VISIBLE as naked eye visible by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 2, Funny

      Something tells me it's a bad idea to put a big bullseye on a building near an airport.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    20. Re:Let's define VISIBLE as naked eye visible by microAmp · · Score: 1

      I see your Target and raise you a Motorola with Digital DNA.
      The building used to belong to Motorola, before it spun off the SPS into Freescale, which was bought or being bought out. The building itself is MOS13, where Apple G3s were made at one time.

      http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&q=Austin,+Tx &ie=UTF8&z=17&ll=30.273189,-97.662524&spn=0.004086 ,0.010664&t=h&om=1

    21. Re:Let's define VISIBLE as naked eye visible by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      if I can see my backyard from google maps.. that's (ahem) [B] VISIBLE FROM SPACE [/B]

      How precisely does being visible in aerial photographs prove anything about being visible from space? (Very little of Google Map's imagery is from orbit.)
    22. Re:Let's define VISIBLE as naked eye visible by sbaker · · Score: 2, Informative

      Google maps isn't all satellite photos. Lots of its content is aerial photography - from planes.

      I doubt they'd be able to get a hold of satellite photographs at better than a meter or so per pixel.

      Besides, I think they mean "Human eye visible from space". But for that, it's not big enough. At 100km altitude (the 'official' edge of space) an object needs to be at least 150 meters across to be visible at all (ie as a little dot that you can't read as a logo). This sign is only about half of that size. You can't see it from space at all without a telescope or something - and if you have that (eg on a military satellite with maybe 10cm resolution) then you can see regular storefront Logos.

      Bah.

      --
      www.sjbaker.org
    23. Re:Let's define VISIBLE as naked eye visible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depending on the zoom level, I presume... otherwise you've got a hell of a backyard!

    24. Re:Let's define VISIBLE as naked eye visible by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 0
      Doesnt space mean 100km from earth?
      Don't be silly, the moon's in space and it's much further away than that.
      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    25. Re:Let's define VISIBLE as naked eye visible by parkrrrr · · Score: 1

      Yep, though it's technically in Rosemont, a suburb of Chicago.

    26. Re:Let's define VISIBLE as naked eye visible by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      I've met several nubile young pagans who are sexually free but regrettably VERY religious.

      My first sex partner was a very religious catholic schoolgirl. I'd say that sexual freedom and religios freedom aren't particularly related.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    27. Re:Let's define VISIBLE as naked eye visible by alta · · Score: 1

      Thanks, only 11 days left before I'm on the way down hill :(

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    28. Re:Let's define VISIBLE as naked eye visible by Hrodvitnir · · Score: 1

      Does it bother anyone else that you scroll up to zoom in on Google Maps, but scroll down on Google Earth?

      --
      "There are more important things than stopping terrorism. Upholding the Constitution is one of them." - Ars Forumer.
  11. Patterns Not Visible From Ground? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    How could an ignorant civilization have created such an intricate design that is only visible from high up? From the ground it looks like nothing. No human could have had the coordination to design such a picture. It must have been made by alien visitors, which neatly explains dinosaur fossils: those are their discarded "chicken" bones.

    1. Re:Patterns Not Visible From Ground? by Gnomes+of+Zurich · · Score: 1

      2000 years ago the Nazca culture in what is now Peru drew large figures in the desert by scraping away the top soil layers. These figures also are not identifiable from the ground. Were the Nazca an ignorant civilization or one skilled in science and mathematics? If this catches on, perhaps in two thousand years to come, archaeologist will be trying to figure out why our culture made these drawings.

    2. Re:Patterns Not Visible From Ground? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would've mod you "genius" if I had points...

    3. Re:Patterns Not Visible From Ground? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once saw a program where they made an hot air balloon out of materials available for that civilization. The produced extremely high quality light fabrics, that would be perfect for hot air balloons.

      They even have paintings on some ceramics that could be interpreted as a ballon.

      When they could do this in 1783 in Europe, the Nazca culture could also do it with the materials they had available.

    4. Re:Patterns Not Visible From Ground? by cyclomedia · · Score: 1

      what i find both infuriating and amusing is that time and time again the same question about the lines comes up : "what are they for?" ... why is it so hard to believe that they're either:

      1. big enough for $Deity to see from upon high
      2. art

      i prefer the latter explanation

      --
      If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
  12. Changes by Fozzyuw · · Score: 1

    New Logo, new space sign, new oil (sans trans-fat). They're really shaking things up over there!

    --
    "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
  13. You mean with the naked eye by PsyQo · · Score: 0

    You mean with the naked eye. I'm sure several countries are able to see my sneaker's brand whenever they want.

    1. Re:You mean with the naked eye by Chaffar · · Score: 1
      I'm sure several countries are able to see my sneaker's brand whenever they want.
      As long as you keep the tinfoil hat on you've got nothing to worry about.
    2. Re:You mean with the naked eye by camperdave · · Score: 1

      I don't think a tinfoil hat will help prevent BigBrotherSat from detecting his sneaker brand. He'll have to have tinfoil spats.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  14. Use of crops for ads? by Salvance · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder why someone doesn't make an advertisement in crops after harvest (e.g. like crop circles)? Seems like it would relatively cheap and easy to make something 100-200 acres (100X larger than the KFC ad), and it would certainly get a lot of press. More people might see it as well, since every flight attendant in the country would point it out to travelers as they fly over.

    --
    Crack - Free with every butt and set of boobs
    1. Re:Use of crops for ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      They do look at the picture about halfway down.

    2. Re:Use of crops for ads? by qwerty+shrdlu · · Score: 2, Interesting
    3. Re:Use of crops for ads? by dch24 · · Score: 1

      How could /. readers forget the Firefox Crop Circle?!?!

    4. Re:Use of crops for ads? by maxume · · Score: 1

      People shrilly whining about the waste of food? (even though it isn't a big deal...)

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:Use of crops for ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usually the clouds block your view if you're flying.

    6. Re:Use of crops for ads? by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

      If you fly into Atlanta Int'l from the west you will notice that Target and Lowe's about 5 miles from the threshold of the runway have exceptionally large logos painted on their roofs.

      No one has their photos updated but they are at this location (notice the dirt being moved for development):
      lat: -84.50022 lon: 33.65948

      Also Old Dominion Freight Lines has a sign on their roof on the east side of ATL:
      http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&z=16&ll=33.654584, -84.32833&spn=0.008591,0.014634&t=k&om=1

      --
      Libertas in infinitum
    7. Re:Use of crops for ads? by Kris_J · · Score: 1
    8. Re:Use of crops for ads? by slightlyunruly · · Score: 1

      Triple J - the national youth broadcaster in Australia - runs a competition to expose the Triple J "drum" logo to as many people as possible.

      This year (whoa... actually... 2004...!!! lost a couple of years there) the entry that won was a 1km x 1.5km image of the drum logo, plowed into a field. Cool :)

      Check it out here

    9. Re:Use of crops for ads? by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's just me, but painting a big ol' bullseye on your roof near an airport is just asking for trouble...

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    10. Re:Use of crops for ads? by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

      On approach to Atlanta Int'l from the west you will see a Target store and Lowe's store just to the north of the approach line. On their roofs they have their logos painted HUGE. The link to it is here: http://www.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&q=atl&ie=UTF8 &om=1&z=15&ll=33.656852,-84.499454&spn=0.016432,0. 043259&t=k
      But the photos are old. The two buildings are in the patch of dirt in the middle of the photograph. When Google updates their sat images they will fix this I am sure.

      Also here is another example of this near the Atlanta airport:
      http://www.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&q=atl&ie=UTF8 &z=16&ll=33.655209,-84.327879&spn=0.008216,0.02162 9&t=k&om=1

      --
      Libertas in infinitum
  15. Grrr by stonertom · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This makes me think some people just have FAR to much money Also http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/AAAAAAAAA!

    --
    Shameless plugs and inaccessible site design FTW! - www.mistletoestreetmusic.com
    1. Re:Grrr by Enoxice · · Score: 1

      That comment was off-topic!

      That being said, you just introduced me to my new favorite website.

      --
      Anyone else think the comments just weren't rendering right before they turned off ABP and saw ads?
  16. Visible from space? by LewsKinslayer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What does it mean to be visible from space? This is totally absurd. My house is visible from space, I've seen it on Google Earth. There are other corporate logos that are probably visible from earth too, when you zoom in as much as they must to see this logo. Give me a break.

    Lews

    1. Re:Visible from space? by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      um...
      you all realize that Google earth is a mosaic of flyovers by airplanes at higher mags right?
      If the joke went woosh, I apologize in advance.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    2. Re:Visible from space? by Ash-Fox · · Score: 2, Funny
      What does it mean to be visible from space?
      Advertising on Google Earth and Virtual Earth.
      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    3. Re:Visible from space? by 4D6963 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Come on, you got his point, don't you? I was about to comment on that too, you don't need to make something friggin huge to have it seen from space, it's all about the resolution you can get from your satelitte, so saying that it's the "First Company Logo Visible From Space" is absurd, for more accuracy it should be "First Company Logo Meant To Be Visible From Space"

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    4. Re:Visible from space? by hey! · · Score: 2, Informative

      As other have ponted out, Google Earth uses aerial orthophotos.

      But in essence you are right. Consider this 5m resolution image. You can see a municipal baseball field in it; you could easily set up an array of a hundred or so people with cardboard placards to make something recognizable in it. And there are commercial images with 4x the resolution.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    5. Re:Visible from space? by not-enough-info · · Score: 1

      When I think of "visible from space" I think visible with the naked eye unassisted by electronic optics from an orbital distance. Not even the Pyramids at Giza claim that. Seriously, once you involve any electronics to see stuff, you can claim everything is "visible from space". I think the only man made things easily visible from space are on the scale of cities (maybe large bridges or highways).

      This KFC thing wasn't meant for "space visibility", it was meant for "google maps visibility".

      --
      ---k--
      </stupid>
    6. Re:Visible from space? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      When I think of "visible from space" I think visible with the naked eye unassisted by electronic optics from an orbital distance.

      Yeah, I thought about that too, and thought you definitly couldn't see it with the naked eye from space, I think it would have to cover hundreds of square meters to be seen from that far. I quickly estimated that each of the logo's pixels (if we can break it down into big pixels) would have to be at least 27x27 meters to be really seen from a vertical distance of 200 km (low earth orbit), so in order to have a logo looking as big as if it was 32x32 pixels to the naked eye from that distance the logo would have to be about 870x870 meters.

      I guess that as it is, you could see it from space but you couldn't recognize our beloved Colonel Sanders.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    7. Re:Visible from space? by GrievousMistake · · Score: 1

      And since there's spy satelites that can read a newspapers headline, any old 2-page ad can claim to be 'visible from space'. I want clear milestones defined on this. Say, 'first logo visible with naked eye with the plain eye from the moon', 'first ad visible from mars', 'first logo visible with naked eye from another solar system', etc.

      I can't wait for time travel to arrive. 'First logo seen on moon in medieval england.', etc.
      The mars face was a nice try, but really, you can hardly see it. Better luck next time, FaceCorp Inc.!

      --
      In a fair world, refrigerators would make electricity.
    8. Re:Visible from space? by richmaine · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you are just asking for the claims to actually be factual. You apparently forget that we are talking about advertising here. :-(

      One doesn't need to make up excuses like "by visible, they mean visible by the naked eye." The real explanation is much simpler: this is advertising and they don't really care whether or not they are telling the truth. Wouldn't be at all surprising if other cases also happened to be visible to the naked eye before. It isn't as though you'd expect them to have actually researched the question to make sure that they were telling the truth under any interpretation.

  17. brilliant! by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Insightful

    we've been beaming decades of reruns of "war of the worlds" into space via tv signals, so the aliens are certain to be wise to the bacteria threat and are certain to bring their antibiotics

    but i don't think anyone has made a movie about alien susceptibility to "supersize me"-style death by artery clogging. so now when the aliens do come, this kfc beacon will guide them to their first meal of addictive tasty trans fats, and they shall die of arteriosclerosis, rather than sepsis

    a brilliant plan! huzzah to kfc for saving the world!

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:brilliant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First advert to aliens for Soylent green anyone?

    2. Re:brilliant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm afraid not... They are removing the trans fats from their oils. Perhaps we could just have the aliens bloat on chicken. Not sure. Any ideas.

  18. The target audience by Xaroth · · Score: 4, Funny

    It seems a reasonable investment, when you think of it. They're targeting the highly desirable "ISS astronaut" market, and everyone knows how much fried chicken those guys eat. They're insatiable!

    1. Re:The target audience by Bent+Mind · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd say the target audience is people who use Google Earth or other up to date satellite service. I know I loaded Google Earth upon reading this. I wonder how long it will be before this ad shows up? I've heard Area 51 is a common search for Google Earth. It's not surprising this add was created near it.

      --
      Request a Linux Shockwave player here: http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform/
    2. Re:The target audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's that little ASCII art guy with the joke flying over his head when you need him?

    3. Re:The target audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't care if anyone could see it. Doing stunts like this, you get free publicity when it is passed along. I mean, how many people here are talking about KFC, over this little stunt??

    4. Re:The target audience by Zephyr14z · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Google Earth isn't up to date.

    5. Re:The target audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but the delivery charges...

    6. Re:The target audience by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but don't astronauts prefer dry, vacuum packed food rather than greasy food packed in a paper bag?

  19. Take me to Colonel Sanders by moankey · · Score: 1

    So when the little green men come and ask "Take me to your leader" they now at least have a mugshot to who they are looking for. A cartoon looking asian man with a goatee in a white suit with a red apron.

    1. Re:Take me to Colonel Sanders by Scarletdown · · Score: 1
      So when the little green men come and ask "Take me to your leader" they now at least have a mugshot to who they are looking for. A cartoon looking asian man with a goatee in a white suit with a red apron.


      Either I need a nap, or I need more coffee. When I first read this, I saw it as:

      A cartoon looking asian man with a goatse in a white suit with a red apron

      Now there's an idea for something to create that's visible from space...

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
  20. What the aliens are thinking by aendeuryu · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Man, I love the smell they have around this planet. Where's it coming from again? Oh, right, this 'KFC' place. Goodness, it smells good. And hey! There's the logo. Tell me, Xghrth, why don't we come here more often?"

    [15 minutes and an empty box later]

    "Ungh.... THAT'S why..."

    1. Re:What the aliens are thinking by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

      >[15 minutes and an empty box later]
      "Ungh.... THAT'S why..."

      [and 15 minutes after that]

      Oooo, Xghrth, [nasty rumbling sounds from all 3 of Xjjanth's primary digestive tubules] I say we nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure this doesn't spread throughout the galaxy!

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  21. For these guys... by El_Smack · · Score: 1

    ...everything is visible from space.

    --


    There are 01 kinds of cars in the world. The General Lee, and everything else.
  22. Billions and Billions by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    Billions and Billions of chickens died for this????

    Sad.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Billions and Billions by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      Sure, if your ruleset means Delicious == Sad.

      No, I don't grieve for chickens. Too many humans to grieve for.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    2. Re:Billions and Billions by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Don't know that I'd call KFC delicious. More like meat spattered with shit and soaked in a fryer.

      Yes, it's true, I prefer not to eat shit.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    3. Re:Billions and Billions by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't go that far; it's not gourmet, but it's pretty tasty for a couple bucks - that, of course being its market anyways. Still, I can't say I've had it in years; almost any KFC I see anymore is attached to a Taco Hell, which I find more appealing, so far as "I'm hungry, and this is the only thing close" food goes.

      Personally, I prefer my own fried chicken. I use seasoned panko and a fryer at 400 degs F with coconut oil (keeps the smoke point high enough to prevent the formation of burnt-oil carcinogens). That way I avoid the greasiness associated with fried food; keep it hot enough and cook it for the right amount of time, and very little oil is retained in the food.

      Shit, I been watching too much Good Eats. It's gourmet for geeks, doncha know?

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    4. Re:Billions and Billions by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Well, some of it also depends on where you're at. I lived in the Seattle area for a few years, and other than an isolated Popeye's and really nice place up north (whose name I've forgotten), KFC was all there was.

      Now I"m back in Texas, and there *is* good fried chicken nearly all over the place. When I want "not bad tasting for a couple of bucks", it's Taco Cabana. Forget Taco Bell. :) There's a popeye's and a golden chick nearby, and KFC isn't cheap enough to warrant eating there.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    5. Re:Billions and Billions by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      Back on topic, meanwhile, on a quick run to the Wawa, I found myself thinking: with all these large-scale-logos things going on (Firefox crop circle, KFC advert, corporate logos list Mickey, Target, Mattel, and Maxim covers), why not at least engineer a really visible project?

      Figure a way to paint the moon with a monochrome Firefox logo.

      I've only done head work so far, but here it is:

      We would need a very large number of lightweight darts, that upon impact on the moon, would spread out, covering a very large area with dark. I'm figuring on making the darts out of about two inches of steel, with essentially an umbrella trailing behind.

      They would be fired off, in LEO, via a linear accelerator (hence the steel). A ballistic orbit would be calculated for each dart that would place them, within certain tolerances, in a grid formation based on the logo specs. The orbit should calculate for a landing thatis normal to the moon's surface.

      The math's going to be a bitch, of course, and so is timing. Anyways, I'm going to sit down and do it, probably building a two body model to figure how each dart will be affected by the last of the drag from LEO, the gravities of earth and moon, the initial speed and positions of LEO launch (my guess is that I'll not be scanning; instead, I'll figure the optimal windows for each launch and 'fire off' the darts as the windows come in).

      Anyways, should be a fun engineering project. I'll get back to y'all when it's ready.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    6. Re:Billions and Billions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      errrrm, that's ok, i'll pass...

  23. Maxim? by CODiNE · · Score: 3, Informative

    Didn't Maxim already do this by putting a magazine cover of theirs somewhere near Las Vegas? It showed up as an overlay in Google Earth so I wasn't sure if it was just a bitmap they paid Google to show, or if it's a representation of the actual billboard but overlaid on older satellite images.

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    1. Re:Maxim? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you are correct. This is not "the first". Maxim one was real, there was tons of pics from helicopters doing flybys.

    2. Re:Maxim? by sebFlyte · · Score: 1

      Glad someone else remembered that. I thought I was going mad.

      --
      "Nothing can shake my belief that this world is the fruit of a dark god whose shadow I extend." - Emil Michel Cioran
    3. Re:Maxim? by Sneakernets · · Score: 1

      correct. and if you wanna get really picky, there have been "Airplane ads" on the tops of skyscrapers for decades.

      --
      "No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson
    4. Re:Maxim? by catwh0re · · Score: 1

      The maxim cover was at: 3537'12.64"N 11522'59.56"W It's gone now.

    5. Re:Maxim? by JazzLad · · Score: 5, Informative

      It has been taken down; here is what it looked like

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    6. Re:Maxim? by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      OK there is a car to give some scale to the picture the thing is what 4 - 5 car lengths wide? Even if it's a 18 wheel truck at aprox 60 feet thats a 100 yards wide and maybe twice that high it's not a whole lot of space 10 football fields roughly.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    7. Re:Maxim? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeh, seems this article contains a but of corporate bs.
      This is not the first. In that link someone leaves a comment to a site that shows other companies that have done it.

  24. Intergalactic Trade by Inmatarian · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh great, now we'll be attracting all of those alien reefer heads to the Earth. The property values planet wide will start dropping.

  25. There's at least one.... by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    Here is a person offering his services: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/02/10/giant-prof anity/

    I wonder how many flight attendants he's scored with?

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  26. Meh by user24 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm still waiting for the first company logo visible from earth (in space).
    I always wondered how much it'd cost to paint the moon with a logo. I know it would be astronomical (heh), but surely it'd be worth it for whichever company (coke) did it? I mean, a logo on the moon! beat that, KFC. Who's going to be looking at their crappy from-space logo if the moon has a frikkin coke logo on it? ha!

    I think I need some more coffee.

    1. Re:Meh by MeanMF · · Score: 1

      I always wondered how much it'd cost to paint the moon with a logo.

      You'd have to fight off The Tick first.. Just ask Chairface.

    2. Re:Meh by Pinkfud · · Score: 5, Funny

      If I could do something to the moon, I'm afraid everyone would be looking at F**K instead of a logo. The world has no idea how lucky it is that I don't have that power.

      --
      The world is my oyster. That's why it's always in a stew.
    3. Re:Meh by user24 · · Score: 1

      PS: if this ever happens, I hereby apologise to humanity.

      PPS: FUCK OFF 'slow down cowboy' I don't care that it's been 47 seconds since I last posted I HAVE MORE TO SAY.

      coffee......coffeeeeeeeeee.. heheh. woo!

    4. Re:Meh by sehlat · · Score: 1

      The idea is fifty years old. Sir Arthur C. Clarke's story "Watch This Space" had the gimmick of a lunar expedition launching a sodium cloud for scientific purposes and finding out that some party or parties unknown had tampered with the launcher so that the cloud had a certain pattern. A large percentage of the population of earth was described as having watched the script-letters of a certain "well-known soft drink" emerge glowingly into the sunlight against the backdrop of the crescent moon.

      Anybody want to bet that sooner or later somebody will try this for real?

    5. Re:Meh by Scarletdown · · Score: 1
      If I could do something to the moon, I'm afraid everyone would be looking at F**K instead of a logo.


      Y'know, I think it is acceptable to use the "fuck word" here on Slashdot instead of bleeping out a couple letters with asterisks. :D

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    6. Re:Meh by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 1

      Being that the moon is a giant sphere, it would likely be the Pepsi logo.

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
    7. Re:Meh by user24 · · Score: 1

      the moon's not spherical, duh, it's a disc, like the sun and the earth.
      what is this third dimension of which you speak?

    8. Re:Meh by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      "Coke adds life!"
      --Red Dwarf

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    9. Re:Meh by Fordiman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah. Coke's working on setting off supernovae, timed so that it lights up the night sky with "Coke Brings Life"

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    10. Re:Meh by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Informative

      Heinlein - The Man Who Sold The Moon http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Man_Who_Sold_the_ Moon

      Moka-Cola and 6+ (analogs for Coca-Cola and 7-UP)

      He bluffs that he has been offered a large sum to turn the Moon into a massive billboard using a rocket which scatters black dust on the surface in patterns [1]. To the owner of the "Moka-Cola" company he implies that the culprit is the rival soft drink maker "6+". To a fervent anti-Communist, he suggests that the Russians may be capable of printing the hammer and sickle across the face of the Moon if they get a lead in rocket technology.
    11. Re:Meh by kristopher · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he was censoring it because it was "Fark".

    12. Re:Meh by cgenman · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize you liked the moon that much.

    13. Re:Meh by ZaphodHarkonnen · · Score: 1

      I wondered how long it would take for someone to mention this.

    14. Re:Meh by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      The cheapest way to do that would be to send a robot up there to paint it.

      Do you realize how much paint it would take? It doesn't even require any math to realize that lifting that much paint would cost more than the entire net worth of any single company.

      A much better option would be to orbit a sat which unfolds into a big reflective logo so people could see it at night. That is at least feasible.

      One other method would be a ginormous bank of lasers to bounce logo off the moon. If this IS possible, it would probably require its own power plant. But you could change the message at any time. Imagine the revenue of doing this before a presidential election!

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    15. Re:Meh by davidpfarrell · · Score: 1

      On a slightly different angle,

      I've always wondered who would be the first to create a logo visible from earth by causing it to disintegrate while entering the atmosphere.

      I've always invisioned a giant flaming Coca-Cola logo flying through the night sky.

      --
      Cube On! (http://stores.ebay.com/PuzzleProz)
    16. Re:Meh by SurturZ · · Score: 2, Funny

      CHA

      (obscure The Tick reference)

    17. Re:Meh by charlieman · · Score: 1

      Here in slashdot, but in the moon he would have to censored it XD

    18. Re:Meh by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      Aw, Belgium! Shows how much I know about obscenity laws on other worlds.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    19. Re:Meh by VVrath · · Score: 1

      I thought it was "Coke adds life"?

    20. Re:Meh by josh_miller · · Score: 1

      I'd write "CHA" on the moon. With a big laser. Powered by a flashlight.

    21. Re:Meh by Culture · · Score: 1

      See Jack Vance Deamon Prince's Novels (i can't remember which one).

      --
      ----- There are two kinds of people in this world, my friend; those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
    22. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One time when I was very angry with life, I was about to write in my will an instruction to be "buried" in an orbiting sattelite with my middle finger being pointed tward Earth at all times.

    23. Re:Meh by braindrainbahrain · · Score: 1

      IIRC, there was once a plan to orbit a bunch of reflective balloons that would make out a logo visible at night to most everyone on earth. I forget what the logo was, something for the French bicentennial, or p\Pepsi, i'm not sure which.

  27. Ahh, just what every marketer aspires for... by csorice7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Darin Stevens couldn't be prouder of the accomplishment. Every marketer around the world just wrenched his fist upon reading this news - darn it, WE wanted to be the first logo seen in space!

    OK Not really.

    Nothing attracts a crowd, well, like a crowd.

    --
    Working to make ideas into reality. www.i4e.com
  28. Wrong Shtick by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    should actually be a poplar joke.
    http://popem.ytmnd.com/

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  29. Deterrent for Alien Invasion? by sehlat · · Score: 1

    They'll see it and decide there's no intelligent life worth exploiting here.

    "Nothing to see here. Move along. Move along."

  30. Obligatory quote by neuro.slug · · Score: 1

    When deep space exploration ramps up, it'll be the corporations that name everything, the IBM Stellar Sphere, the Microsoft Galaxy, Planet Starbucks.

    I can't wait to see a logo on the moon.

    1. Re:Obligatory quote by rvr · · Score: 1

      Well, if someone were to simply use the "man in the moon" image as their earth bound corporate logo, then the work of putting that on the moon has already been done. Of course there could a prior use argument here about using that logo.

    2. Re:Obligatory quote by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Well, if someone were to simply use the "man in the moon" image as their earth bound corporate logo, then the work of putting that on the moon has already been done. Of course there could a prior use argument here about using that logo.

      Look at the logo on a bar of Ivory Soap http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procter_&_Gamble#Logo _controversy

  31. Target Market = Tinfoil hat wearers by Scott7477 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is not such a bad idea; when the paranoids and UFO watchers check satellite shots of Area 51 they'll see the KFC ad, and notice they're hungry. Actually, Area 51 is probably near the top of the list of places people plug into Google Earth, so a lot of people are likely to see this.

    --
    "Lack of technical competence coupled with the arrogance of power, as usual, leads to no good end."
    1. Re:Target Market = Tinfoil hat wearers by neuro.slug · · Score: 1

      Except you're forgetting that:

      1) The tin-foil demographic isn't really that large
      2) They probably also believe some urban legend / conspiracy theory about KFC already

    2. Re:Target Market = Tinfoil hat wearers by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Actually, Area 51 is probably near the top of the lis

      Enough so that Google Earth will take you to it by just typing in "Area 51", which tells me it is basically a common 'shortcut'. Remember, they do gather info from everyone using the free (as in beer) version, with their consent.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    3. Re:Target Market = Tinfoil hat wearers by Karthikkito · · Score: 1

      They can even use their tinfoil hats to refrigerate their leftover chicken!

  32. mars face ? by openright · · Score: 1

    I guess, the owner of the parallel Mars TLC (Taste-Like-Chicken) franchise abandoned the above ground market long ago.

  33. secret plot by spamchang · · Score: 1

    shhh, we're trying to make them too overweight to withstand earth gravity...we should also wear placards that say "eat more chikin." oh wait...

  34. Billboard from space by linuxtelephony · · Score: 4, Funny

    Billboard on busy highway during rush hour, $5,000
    Television ad during Superbowl, $1,200,000
    Getting your logo on Google for free, Priceless

    So, what's next and how much will be spent to get "free" advertising on Google?
    Or, when will GOogle get wise and start charging for AdSpace or EarthAds?

    --
    . 62,400 repetitions make one truth -- Brave New World, Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:Billboard from space by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      Just how much is "Turn your press release into a Slashdot story!" service going for these days?

    2. Re:Billboard from space by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 1

      ...when will GOogle get wise and start charging for AdSpace or EarthAds?

      Better yet, Google could black out the areas for which companies haven't paid.

      muahahaha!

      --
      Soylent Green is peoplicious!
    3. Re:Billboard from space by fsterman · · Score: 1

      Or when will that patch actually get updated?

      --
      Is there anything better than clicking through Microsoft ads on Slashdot?
    4. Re:Billboard from space by stud9920 · · Score: 1

      1999 called, it wants its priceless jokes back...

  35. Time for a new right... by caitsith01 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think we need the right not to look at advertising.

    Am I alone in thinking that advertising should be restricted to certain public spaces designated as 'commercial', and should otherwise not be permitted? I strongly feel that I should be able to move around the world freely without having to look at KFC ads. We pay quite a lot of attention to our environment in a chemistry/biology context, but very little to it in terms of what kind of mental environment we are inhabiting.

    I am generally relatively libertarian, believe it or not. I hate laws that interfere unneccessarily with people's right to do whatever they want. But the day I can't go anywhere on this planet without seeing an orbiting billboard is the day I become a serial killer. I guess I consider that a billboard or whatever isn't really 'over there' on someone else's property, because I feel its effects wherever I have the misfortune to observe it.

    Put it this way - would we tolerate sound advertising that was audible from anywhere on earth? No. So why is visual advertising any different?

    We are in danger of becoming a civilisation so enamoured with commerce that we have no independent culture or sense of aesthetics. I mean, we're branding the fucking PLANET now? It's sick. Commerce is a means to an end: we have made it an end in itself. As the first comment on the blog says, "this makes me want to kill myself".

    --
    Read Pynchon.
    1. Re:Time for a new right... by Detritus · · Score: 4, Funny
      Am I alone in thinking that advertising should be restricted to certain public spaces designated as 'commercial', and should otherwise not be permitted?

      Yes. Next question.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    2. Re:Time for a new right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, since you so spectacularly fucked up answering the first question I think you should
      temper your high ambitions of answering another one.

    3. Re:Time for a new right... by caitsith01 · · Score: 1

      ATF should be a convenience store, not a government agency.

      Your sig is instructive as to your notion of what a 'society' is and how it should operate.

      Thanks for the insightful comment...

      --
      Read Pynchon.
    4. Re:Time for a new right... by tilandal · · Score: 1

      You cant make out the add from ground level. The only way you would find it is to look at an overhead photo of it. If companies actually start launching adds into space you have something to protest about.

    5. Re:Time for a new right... by caitsith01 · · Score: 1

      What about pictures of the Earth, though?

      I prefer the beautiful blue and white orb version to the "Eat at KFC!!!" version, myself. Quite a lot, actually.

      --
      Read Pynchon.
    6. Re:Time for a new right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, it wouldn't be much of a loss for many people, since we don't look up at the heavens too much anymore.

    7. Re:Time for a new right... by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      I like ads. They add artwork and entertainment to what would be dull space. National parks and nature preserves should be ad-free, but I don't mind them in cities.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    8. Re:Time for a new right... by smutt · · Score: 1

      I had the joy of living in a place without advertising once. I was livining in Poland shortly after Solidarity. Lech Walesa was still president and the country had yet to fully adopt a lot of its current western stuff. I'll never forget when they started putting up billboards in Warsaw. I recognized a shift in my own personal relationship to space. I wish other people could go through this same experience. But how many people today have lived without billboards? Have you ever gone 6 months without seeing an advert?

      Advertising affects us. It affects our environment in both mental and subconscious ways. If it didn't work then companies wouldn't pay for it.

      --
      The Information Revolution will be fought on the command line.
    9. Re:Time for a new right... by Queen+of+Dudley · · Score: 1

      I've been thinking a lot about advertising lately and I agree with the post about the right not to see advertising. Advertising has gotten out of hand and these days there really is no easy way that people can chose not to see advertising - and that's the "problem" with advertising, it's unsolicited. Advertising is not in itself bad, it does supply consumers with information about goods and services that are available for purchase and this is not a trivial thing, just imagine a world completely lacking advertising and you will realise that with todays enourmous markets it would take a lot of time to find out where to get the things you need (or crave). True, that it might have the effect that we didn't crave as many things and that there simply would be less goods and services to buy (and if that is good or bad is a completely different topic), but it would also make it hard and time-consuming for the consumers to inform themselves about the things they want to consume. Where can I get it? How much will it cost? What are the differences between these two similar goods? So, a shift towards solicited rather than unsolicited might be the way to go. As a consumer I could then sign up for various advertising services, but to be sure those advertising services would only advertise stuff that I am actually interested in, and only advertise it in a more informative way than most advertising does today. Other people would chose other advertising services more geared towards their preferences. Most companies would hate it if we moved in that direction, but as I said I don't think that it would mean they couldn't advertise, because advertising fulfills a function for the consumer as well as the company, it would just limit the advertising to different channels. I don't really think this is realistic at the moment, and the trend is certainly going in the opposite direction as this article shows. There are small glimmers of hope though, like the ads in Google that does sort of indirectly check your preferences by what you search for - but it's still lacking in the choice department.

    10. Re:Time for a new right... by Detritus · · Score: 1
      Have you ever gone 6 months without seeing an advert?

      Yes, I've lived in several places that had no billboards or advertising of any kind. I can't say that their absence had an effect on me. The absence of television was more noticeable. I spent more time reading books and watching movies at the local movie theatre.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    11. Re:Time for a new right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just think, in the future, apartments will have OLED walls that look normal unless they're activated. If you want a cheaper rent, you'll let corporate america brainwash you 24/7.

      God bless America.

    12. Re:Time for a new right... by tilandal · · Score: 1

      If you were to look at a picture of the entire planet it would be impossible to make out the KFC logo. You can only see it if you zoom in very close. The Great Wall is nearly 4000 miles long and it is just barely visible from near earth orbit.

  36. This is sad. by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1, Insightful

    These people are scumbag profiteers. They pollute the airwaves with their obnoxious commercials and poison the public with their unhealthy food.

    Now they are creating visual pollution on the grandest scale.

    This is nothing but predatory profiteering and these giant ads, and this is not the first one, should be made illegal.

    Damn. When is enough enough??

    1. Re:This is sad. by Knara · · Score: 1

      Whew. I was totally waiting for a ranting, frothing comment like this, and thought that I would be disappointed... but you saved me! Thanks dude!

  37. Asimov thought about it decades ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just read the novel "Buy Jupiter" by Isaac Asimov. If I recall correctly, in that story the entire planet Jupiter is sold to aliens who want to use it as an enormous advertising surface targeted at spaceships travelling nearby.

  38. Just like Family Guy by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1

    it will sound something like this

    Alien: Wait a minute, you're telling me, that I flew all the way to Earth, to get to your leader, and, and the colonel isn't even working today?
    Worker: He really dead.
    ALien: What?
    Worker: I say he dead.
    Alien: Is Mr. Sanders in?
    Worker: What wrong wit you? I say you he dead!
    Alien: ......... THE COLONEL?!

    1. Re:Just like Family Guy by cheese-cube · · Score: 1

      Damn it you beat me to it!

      *in southern drawl* What's wrong with you? I say you he dead!

  39. Mattel logo also visible by yasny_jp · · Score: 1

    I'm not exactly sure what "visible from space" means, but I know that Mattel (the toy maker) owns a building near where I work and you can see their logo from pretty far away. Look up a satellite image of 333 Continental Blvd, El Segundo, CA 90245 (the logo is behind the Address window that Google pops-up).

    --
    Treat every day like it's your last; delete your browser cache before going to bed.
  40. Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Area 51 now has a fast food joint?

  41. This one is from the 1920s by gurudyne · · Score: 4, Interesting

    -86.49187 Longitude
    41.66944 Latitude

    It is on the Bendix Proving Grounds, just West of South Bend, Indiana.

    Those are 20-30 meter tall trees. And the word 'Studebaker'(original owner) is about 550 meters long.

    --
    Hey, Mom! Is it beer, yet?
    1. Re:This one is from the 1920s by dch24 · · Score: 1
      If you'd like to view it in Google Earth, copy and paste this as a .kml file:

      <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
      <kml xmlns="http://earth.google.com/kml/2.1">
      <Documen t>
      <Placemark>
      <name>Studebaker</name>
      <LookAt>
      <longitude>-86.49160929064662</longitude>
      <latitude>41.66870852724252</latitude>
      <altitude>0</altitude>
      <range>1122.844386163881</range>
      <tilt>2.49242147227204e-010</tilt>
      <heading>-82.67122765525694</heading>
      </LookAt>
      <Point>
      <coordinates>-86.49027777777778,41.6675,0 </coordinates>
      </Point>
      </Placemark>
      </Document>
      </kml>
    2. Re:This one is from the 1920s by dch24 · · Score: 1

      Actually, you'll have to delete a space slashcode added to the <Document> tag

    3. Re:This one is from the 1920s by redd+robber · · Score: 1

      How about the coordinates to the KFC logo?

    4. Re:This one is from the 1920s by spitzak · · Score: 3, Informative
    5. Re:This one is from the 1920s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    6. Re:This one is from the 1920s by roster238 · · Score: 1
      --
      I swear I didn't know it was loaded...
  42. Allow me to say: by Lethyos · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I hate corporate America.

    --
    Why bother.
  43. Tarp, not Tiles? by Enuratique · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Did anyone else notice at the end of the time lapse video the helicopter draft blowing away what looked like a tarp, and not tiles, making the design? Or am I just crazy?

    --
    A black hole is where God divided by 0
    1. Re:Tarp, not Tiles? by q-the-impaler · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I figured I'd look for another post about it before I posted redundantly. Cracked me up.

      --
      Sierra Tango Foxtrot Uniform
  44. First? Ha! by kiltyj · · Score: 5, Funny

    They must've forgotten about the "©2006 Google" clearly visible by satellite every 200 ft.

  45. NOT the first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maxim already did this. We were quite graced by a huge Eva picture that did feature the Maxim logo as part of the front cover.

    KFC is not the first. I wish I could mod this story "Inaccurate".

  46. NOT visible from space. by mnmn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Visible from space means, visible from where the atmosphere effectively ends. Even in the lower strata, the buildings and the roads will also have to be visible for the logo to be visible.

    Its really visible when you use zooming technology, in which case my house and care are already visible thanks to Google Earth as proof.

    And plenty of company logos can be found going through Google Earth.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
    1. Re:NOT visible from space. by 0jjjjjjjjjj0 · · Score: 1

      Google Earth uses some aerial pictures (http://earth.google.com/earth.html) to produce the higher zoom levels. "Visible from plane" is a more accurate description of your house and (I presume you mean) car.

      --
      WANRING: This warning is misspelt.
  47. Real? by wicka · · Score: 1

    If you look on Google Earth you can find exactly where it was built (near Area 51, by some large green circles) and there is no indication any logo was or is going to be built there.

    1. Re:Real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know it can take up to years for the image sets to get updated, right?

  48. first? by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 3, Funny

    What about the company whose logo is the Earth?

    1. Re:first? by Futaba-chan · · Score: 1

      Universal Pictures, you mean? Yes, that logo has been visible from space for quite some time now....

  49. wrong business by ILuvRamen · · Score: 0

    didn't they ever hear about aliens doing cow mutilations? They're obviously more of the McDonalds type crowd.

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
  50. Imagining by BRUTICUS · · Score: 1

    the future, a world where forests are replaced with the worlds largest export. Advertisements. Finger lickin' good!

  51. I object! by scolen2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Back in 93' I mowed with a tractor a RHCP logo into my field that was over 10 Acers... It was not only visible by traffic flying into San Jose but also from space. SO.. I'm suing! Accually, you can almost still see it after the grass grew in.. you'll see it in teh center... http://terraserver-usa.com/image.aspx?T=1&S=11&X=1 551&Y=10252&Z=10&W=1 :-)

  52. Ads need to be visible standing on the Earth by derek_farn · · Score: 3, Insightful
    What is the point of ads visible from Earth orbit? Are there lots of people in orbit to sell to? The ads need to be visible by somebody standing on the Earth. Perhaps they could be on the Moon.

    Here is a well known company whose logo is also visible from space.

    1. Re:Ads need to be visible standing on the Earth by internewt · · Score: 1

      What is the point of ads visible from Earth orbit? Are there lots of people in orbit to sell to?

      There's only a few in orbit, but some of them are really really wealthy, so you want them as your customer ;)
      --
      Car analogies break down.
    2. Re:Ads need to be visible standing on the Earth by soliptic · · Score: 1

      Where? I think you searched for Teddington to get you started, then scrolled to the logo, then pasted us the link in your URL bar. Doesn't work - you need to hit "link to this page" on the right hand side for the URL to update according to where you scrolled.

      I tried looking around for a while but couldn't find anything within a few minutes...

      Funny, the train I get to work in the morning is bound for Teddington.

    3. Re:Ads need to be visible standing on the Earth by derek_farn · · Score: 1

      That's what I did and it works ok for me.

  53. Visible from space by toetagger1 · · Score: 1

    With the naked eye, if you are standing on the moon? Or from the space station? From the video, it looks like its visible by SATELITES with LENSES from outer space. And its nothing new that you can read the logo of any truck, roof top, or other area since decades!

    --
    who | grep -i blond | date cd ~; unzip; touch; strip; finger; mount; gasp; yes; uptime; umount; sleep
  54. How much was Slashdot paid by istartedi · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    How much was Slashdot paid to post this? Nothing? You got ripped off. More seriously, if I was running a news site, I might be inclined not to run any stories that were specificly related to the novelty of an ad campaign. I mean, I wouldn't shoot myself in the foot. For example, if the Chinese send somebody to the moon and the rocket just happens to have McWonton's logo on the side, I wouldn't refuse to run the story just for that. If, on the other hand, the payload includes a giant mylar LMart sign, why run a story on that without pay? I'd just say "in addition to exploring the moon, the rocket will also carry advertising".

    If that become the journalistic standard, either news outlets will get paid to report this crap (probably unethical) or we can look forward to less obtrusive ads. I know. I'm a dreamer. See you at Jack Kent Cook Memorial Stadium... or Candlestick Park.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  55. What About Eva? by cdrudge · · Score: 5, Informative

    Apparently KFC never heard of Maxim's giant magazine cover of Eva Longoria.

    1. Re:What About Eva? by Poeir · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Maxim giant magazine cover isn't a logo, that's the only real difference here.

      --
      Sigs are like bumper stickers.
  56. I for one Welcome our new by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Battlesuit-enabled Chicken Overlords and was glad when they roasted all the KFC execs after the Revolution.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  57. Company Logo Visible from Earth by j_f_chamblee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm still waiting for the first company logo visible from earth (in space).

    If there is anything that would lead me to seriously consider engaging in open rebellion against capitalist western culture, a la Camus, this would be it. The last thing some New Guinea Fore or Enga tribesperson or some Australian aborigine needs to see is a damned red and blue sphere with a wavy white stripe down the middle floating across the night sky (personally, I think Pepsi would do it first). I mean c'mon people, have some fscking perspective! Are marketing gurus really so stupid and vain that this would seem like a good idea?

    Hmm, lack of perspective, marketing gurus, stupidity and vanity....

    I think I just answered my own question.

    Crap. I don't like rebellion. ;-)

    --
    The first principle is that you must not fool yourself - and you are the easiest person to fool. -Richard Feynman
    1. Re:Company Logo Visible from Earth by NoMaster · · Score: 1
      The last thing some New Guinea Fore ... needs to see is a damned red and blue sphere with a wavy white stripe down the middle floating across the night sky.
      Because, yes, it's totally alien to them.

      (The real problem is, of course, getting the guy up there with his trolley to re-stock the vending machine...)

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    2. Re:Company Logo Visible from Earth by Joel+from+Sydney · · Score: 1
      Are marketing gurus really so stupid and vain that this would seem like a good idea?
      In short, yes. I remember reading an article several years ago about the intrusion of advertising into every facet of our society. To prove a point the author asked several marketing gurus if, given the opportunity, they'd be interested in projecting a client's logo on to the Sydney Opera House. Never mind that it's a public building, national landmark, world icon etc, most of the marketing gurus said something like "yeah, it's fantastic space, of course we'd do that".

      Makes me weep for the future.
  58. What is the freakin' point? by mark-t · · Score: 1

    It's not like they'll deliver there...

    1. Re:What is the freakin' point? by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      you've heard of it, right?

      Job well done.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  59. Rate of return on advertising by netsfr · · Score: 1

    What is the ROI for trying to advertise to the 15 or so living in the ISS?

    1. Re:Rate of return on advertising by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      0.

      now the ROI on all the people who are posting in on every space/geek/tech/advertiser websites is huge!

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Rate of return on advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      now the ROI on all the people who are posting in on every space/geek/tech/advertiser websites is huge!

      Really? What percentage of those reading this story on whatever space/geek/tech site is now going to rush out and buy KFC? What percentage will now be more inclined to buy KFC than they were prior to reading about this stunt?

      The actual ROI, as with most "branding" exercises for such large global corporates, is slim to nothing. Had this been a company most people hadn't heard of (say Google back when it was just starting out) there'd be a huge ROI. The likes of KFC, Coke, Pepsi, Apple, Microsoft etc etc don't get much return out of this shit.

  60. AKA Slippery Chicken ... by jaypeg · · Score: 1

    Slips in, slips out

  61. It should be by geekoid · · Score: 1

    I hate corporations,

    Corporate abuse existed well before America existed. Which is why it was nearly forbidden in the constitution. Imagine if Jefferson had gotten is way? The world would be a better place.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:It should be by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Or it would have been conquered by Nazis when the agrarian US was unable to enter WWII and Germany could focus on defeating the Soviets.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  62. Attn to all the alien jokers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    KFC attracts aliens? Aliens can be vegetarians, you insensitive clod! Regards, Zygkrjl

  63. Just to clarify... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    children first
    captcha: nonsense

  64. Well i think taht GWERNT by b1gW33N15 · · Score: 1

    ha cha cha cha cha !!!!!!!! i did not mean for that to b erepeteitvea LOL

    1. Re:Well i think taht GWERNT by b1gW33N15 · · Score: 1

      LOL LOL LOL

  65. Really large enough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that really "visible from space" or is it "visible from space using a high resolution imaging satellite"?

    I mean, I'm sure I've seen logos in Google Earth before, so this one wouldn't precede those ones. But if "visible from space" means visible with the naked eye, then how do we know this one is large enough??

  66. Readymix sign on Nullabor Plain - decades ago by whatteaux · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is bollocks.

    I remember reading, decades ago, in the Guinness Book O' Records about the worlds' biggest sign - "so big it's visible from space" - being the Readymix sign in the Nullabor Plain.

  67. KFC = Kentucky Fried Chicken by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Informative
    I thought this one sentance at the end of TFA was quite interesting:
    KFC has also now reintroduced the name "Kentucky Fried Chicken" into their marketing materials.
    "Kentucky Fried Chicken" was changed to KFC back in 1991!

    You may or may not have heard the rumor that they were forced to change the name to KFC because the FDA said their chicken was not longer chicken... but apparently that is not true. According to snopes, here are the reasons they changed the name:
    • A move to de-emphasize "chicken" because KFC planned to offer a varied menu that included other types of food. (The Boston Chicken corporation took the same approach for the same reason, changing their name of its retail food outlets to Boston Market.)

    • A desire to eliminate the word "fried," which has negative connotations to the increasingly health-conscious consumer market.

    • A recent trend towards the abbreviation of long commercial titles, as demonstrated by other companies' employing shortened forms of their names, such as The International House of Pancakes (IHOP) and Howard Johnson's (HoJo).
    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:KFC = Kentucky Fried Chicken by CastrTroy · · Score: 0

      According to a different article, oddly enough also on snopes, KFC changed their name because the state of Kentucky (actually, the Commonwealth of Kentucky) requires companies to pay royalties for using the word Kentucky. So they decided to get rid of the word Kentucky to avoid paying royalties. I don't know which article is right, although the one I linked to tries to debunk the myth that says KFC changed their name to get rid of the fried part (which is the reason given in your article), while your article is debunking the myth of, it's not actually chicken, which I don't think anybody thought was true in the first place.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:KFC = Kentucky Fried Chicken by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Kentucky Fried Cruelty is more like it.

    3. Re:KFC = Kentucky Fried Chicken by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      That was actually the Snopes article I had been looking for, but since I couldn't find it, I posted the one that showed up.

      Here's the curious thing... that article claims the Kentucky Derby changed its name to "The Run for the Roses" because of those licensing issues... BUT, if you go to http://www.kentuckyderby.com/ you'll see that they're still using the name.

      And a quick google search didn't turn up anything about Kentucky trademarking "Kentucky". Go figure.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    4. Re:KFC = Kentucky Fried Chicken by davidsyes · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yep, and they definitely are Kentucky Fried Chicken here in California. I just saw some a few days ago, but it did have me wondering when they switched back to Kentucky Fried Chicken from KFC. Yeh, "We do CHICKEN RIGHT"... Sure, tell that to the chickens...

      What's next from KFC? DFAJ? Deep-Fried Alien Jerky?

      But, maybe the Colonel will panic when I set up my 130,000 tiles visible from space, saying "COME AND GET US!". But, I guess the department of homeland insecurity will balk or arrest me for that one... I could get 20 years for conspiring to and inciting of an alien invasion.

      -----------
      Speaking of 20 years...

      "Mid-flight sexual play lands U.S couple in trouble"

      http://www.japantoday.com/jp/news/390426

      THAT couple could get 20 years based on made comments to the flight attendant...

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    5. Re:KFC = Kentucky Fried Chicken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      I'm actually from Kentucky, and I'll tell you that it's true. Kentucky did trademark its name and it led to the "Run for the Roses" and KFC crap. I first noticed KFC using its full name about 6 months ago, as for the kentucky derby site, it seems to have originally been created back in 1995.
      It could have just been a realization on the part of the politicians that their initial shakedown would lead to obscurity for our state. So they relented.

    6. Re:KFC = Kentucky Fried Chicken by Rugikiki · · Score: 3, Informative

      From the link at the bottom of the page, one is redirected to the Lost Legends page, which explains it to be a hoax.

    7. Re:KFC = Kentucky Fried Chicken by Stanistani · · Score: 1
      Kentucky Fried Cruelty is more like it.

      Oh R'leyh!

      You're just cranky because you haven't been able to rise from the depths and bring tentacled gelatinous death to us all.

      Bide your time, Elder one.

      Your dark minions at PITA, er PETA will do your bidding...
  68. SETI signal decoded by grumpyman · · Score: 1

    Alien A: What's that sign? Alien B: Hey! That's KFC!

  69. Endangering humans! ;) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now the aliens knows where to get their slimy food :-)

    Maybe if those aliens are American, otherwise I'm sure that unless they eat humans most aliens won't associate the sign with something to eat.

  70. Scale is more impressive too by Vengeance_au · · Score: 1

    The KFC logo is 65,000 tiles 1 foot by 1 foot - another way of saying 65,000 square feet. The Studebaker logo is approximately (using the Google Earth ruler and rounding down) 2000 feet long and 200 feet high, bringing it in at 400,000 square feet. Thats 6.15 times the size - and its been kicking around for 80+ years now. Significantly more impressive in my book.

    I think the author of the article linked and the submitter are both drinking the kool-aid. Kudos to gurudyne for pointing out a bit of prior art thats more impressive to boot.

    1. Re:Scale is more impressive too by gurudyne · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the kudos. I had a job that had me ride as an observer for one day as a truck was being wrung out on the rougher sections of the test track. Each test mile was supposed to be the equivalent of 50 road miles. I don't think my kidneys would have lasted a week.

      --
      Hey, Mom! Is it beer, yet?
  71. Post Envy by MagicAlex84 · · Score: 1

    Their sites first post beats our site's first post.

  72. Money well spent by spockboy · · Score: 1

    Too bad now that they've spent their excess budget to advertise their food to astronauts with telescopes, they can't contribute more to feeding some of the 16,000 children on this planet who die every day from hunger (almost 6,000,000 per year).

  73. Re:Use of crops for ads? Firefox! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
  74. Scare the Aliens by FragHARD · · Score: 1

    It is just to scare the aliens looking for the ships they lost that are being stored in area 51... now that the colonel is guarding the area!

    --
    FragHARD or don't frag at all
  75. Math Question by mikehilly · · Score: 1
    Ok let me first say: I admit that I don't regulary use complex mathmatics in my day to day activities, BUT...

    The article clearly says that the logo covers 87,500 square feet and that it only took 65,000 one foot by one foot titles. Last time I check, 87,500 square feet != 65,000 square feet.

    Of course, maybe they are using new math. Or maybe it is a government coverup. Some of the logo was confiscated, probed with alien technology, and then returned larger than it started out....

    Any other thoughts?

    Correct spelling not guaranteed in this post.

    1. Re:Math Question by kasek · · Score: 1

      or, the other 22,500 square feet is just plain old dirt, that has no tiles over it.

  76. Your link is the key to why it's near Area 51 by Salvance · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh wow, you just made me realize why they put it near Area 51 ... Google Earth (and other desktop satellite imagery)! I couldn't figure it out before, but your link made me realize that even though Area 51 is a no fly zone, TONS of people will still see it online. Think of all the kooky UFO websites that republish satellite pictures of Area 51. They have a huge audience of folks who are browsing for more info on Area 51. Now all these late night UFOlogists will have the answer to their hunger pains.

    --
    Crack - Free with every butt and set of boobs
  77. Blown away? by mugnyte · · Score: 1


      at the end of the vid, does the camera heli blow the edge of the logo away? Drat! more effort!

  78. Wow by Mr.+Samuel · · Score: 1

    This is either a major feat for mankind, or the sound of our entire race jumping the shark.

  79. I can just hear... by petrus4 · · Score: 1

    ...the conversation in a passing UFO.

    Grey 1:"You mean to say they actually *eat* that shit? Thank the Central Core for our intradermal nutrient absorption...Can you imagine what *their* stuff must taste like?"

    Grey 2:"Yeah. The thing I really don't understand is that on the one hand, the humans complain that a visit from *us* is traumatic, but then they subject themselves to horrible experiences like that, and find that less scary! I'm really insulted!"

  80. "Visible"? by Dormann · · Score: 1

    What does "visible from space" mean? Surely they don't mean with the naked eye; it's still far too small. And the last time I checked Google Earth, the bushes in my front yard were apparently visible from space.

  81. Here is the address. by Psycosys · · Score: 1

    Old Mill St at Groom Rd, Alamo, NV 89001

    There is nothing there on the current version of the google maps but we may be able to see it in the future.

  82. Second logo visible from space.. by kbox · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't the first logo visible from space be this?

  83. First Company Logo visible From Low Earth Orbit by LordSnooty · · Score: 3, Informative

    There, fixed the headline for you.

  84. That settles it ... by Joebert · · Score: 1

    They must have a Taco Bell in Area 51.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  85. I dissagree, this is a pop culture news story. by Brigadier · · Score: 1



    how long do you think it will take for every local news station in the US to air this story as fill material. elections are over people are tired of the iraq story. They are looking the did you know story. So all in all I think it's a good idea. It' slike the biggest ball of yarn somewhere out in teh midwest. Its usefull but because of its size and uselessness its an icon.

  86. get yourself a coupon for a $1 "snacker sandwich" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The hidden message for their little promo on kfc.com is "finger lickin good"

  87. Raping the desert by linuxwrangler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I bet this brilliant f**ing "event company" just saw that they needed to clear a bunch of "weeds". Apparently they didn't bother to find out how long desert plants take to regrow. Scars in the desert can take decades to heal.

    I was born and raised in the Mojave Desert. It's a beautiful place and it makes me sick to see a bunch of out-of-town yahoos clearcut a bunch of it for their little stunt. 'Course environmental awareness isn't the first thing that KFC brings to mind so it's par for the course.

    --

    ~~~~~~~
    "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
    1. Re:Raping the desert by Nethead · · Score: 1

      I grew up in central Washington State; i.e: desert. If you're worried about saving the desert then I'd be a bit more upset about Hanford, the Yakima Training Center and, well, Yakima itself.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    2. Re:Raping the desert by adolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I want to paste a logo onto my yard, that's my problem. And if I want to paste a Really Big logo onto my Really Big yard, that's also my problem.

      Methinks that it's probably the best use that the landowner has ever gotten out of that particular stitch of property.

  88. I don't see it. by fontkick · · Score: 1

    Here's a picture of Earth from space:

    http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/cassini/multimed ia/pia08324.html

    I can't see the logo. I think they need to get a refund from the sign shop.

  89. Heinlein did it, too. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Heinlein used it, too, in "The Man who Sold the Moon" (a "Future History" story about the first moonshot being done by a private entrepreneur).

    The hypotheitcal, inexpensive, scheme was to set off a few "skyrockets" from the landing site to dust the moon with soot in a pattern, making the logo by selectively darkening the surface.

    The logo of the "6+" (obviously 7up) company would have fit and been visible. So he sells the rights to the story analog of the Coca-Cola company (whose logo would NOT fit). That way they get to do an advertising campaign about how they paid so the moon would NOT be turned into a billboard by their competition, while the private-rocket-company guy gets his bucks and doesn't have to actually do anything (let alone carry a payload full of skyrockets and use them to paint the moon.) B-)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  90. At least now we know by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1

    what is in KFC food, it's space aliens. They had to do something with those frozen bodies before they spoiled.

    1. Re:At least now we know by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      You are right.

      And this works, cause they taste just like chicken!

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
  91. From nerds to KFC: by Zorque · · Score: 5, Funny

    Needs antialiasing.

  92. I believe Zyrgon asked the right question... by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

    (This is from an antique Bloom County strip)
    "Are earthlings white meated or dark meated?"

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
    1. Re:I believe Zyrgon asked the right question... by Blue+Fox+USA · · Score: 1

      Opus is NOT antique! thank YOU very much!

  93. I see it now. First, burnt grilled cheese sandwich by Bananatree3 · · Score: 1

    where they charge admission to see it (certain online casino name left blank). Next it will be McDee's crop circle postcards at 3$ a pop.

  94. Laser ADs on the moon by Danathar · · Score: 1

    I don't have a problem if Pizza hut wants to pay to put their logo on a solid rocket booster or painting the shuttle....but some things should NEVER be done.

    There was some report that the russians (or somebody) was developing a way to use lasers to put an image on the moon. The last thing I want when with my girlfriend on a full moonlit night is to look up and see the Golden Arches being projected on the Lunar Surface.

    If that happens I'll support a strategic NUCLEAR strike on the laser facility!

    1. Re:Laser ADs on the moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Egads, man, that wasn't the Russians. It was Chairface. Spoon!

    2. Re:Laser ADs on the moon by Firefly1 · · Score: 1
      If that happens I'll support a strategic NUCLEAR strike on the laser facility!
      What, no volunteering to take the controls of 'Old Dog Zero One'...?

      (Reference: 'Flight of the Old Dog' by Dale Brown)
      --
      - White Knight of the Order of Mihoshi Enthusiasts
  95. Don't forget.. by Junta · · Score: 4, Funny

    The time may come when the firefox logo is visible. Of course, then we must all panic as the giant space fox has come to hump the planet...

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    1. Re:Don't forget.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  96. *deep breath* by Lisandro · · Score: 1

    Am i the only one who thought they were placing the logo in space? I swear, the moment i raise my eyes and find a corporate logo hanging in the sky i'm going on a killing rampage.

  97. Now what... by guruevi · · Score: 1

    Is this the beginning of a drive-through planet? Maybe KFC is onto something. Imagine a Sovereign-class starship coming through with an order... (oblig. Star Trek reference)

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  98. Trementina Base by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about the Church of Scientology's Trementina Base ... a symbol created so that the souls of previous scientologists passing by in space-ships know where to land in order to come home. It's a marker set up by one of the worlds most influential business enterprises for the express purpose of being seen from space. KFC "first" indeed. Just because CoS is 99% nut jobs doesn't make it any less of a business enterprise.

  99. I love marketing companies. by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

    My heart swells with pride to see humanity investing so much effort in such profoundly beneficial ventures.

    I love the marketing companies of this world, the true innovators! These truly are the golden years of progress.

  100. I bet PETA just had a collective aneurysm by LowTolerance · · Score: 1

    For a company infamous for cutting corners when it comes to the quality of meat they serve, this seems like an outrageous waste of money/real estate.

    Meet your meat.

  101. Readymix did it in 1967. by HeyTC · · Score: 2, Interesting

    GoogleMap: http://tinyurl.com/ts7nh "About 1965, (3) probably in winter (Hoare, 2003), a decision was made to construct a giant rendition of the Readymix company logo virtually exactly halfway along the Eyre Highway, north of the 225 mile peg. ...The diamond, its long axis at a bearing of 82[degrees] true, measured two miles long by one mile high [3.2 x 1.6km, so each side was 1.8km], with each letter being 800x600 feet [240x180m]." Reference: http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286- 9508372_ITM

  102. Oblig... by GeorgeS069 · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia the chicken fries you

    --
    I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy
  103. Fucked Up Priorities by Einstein_101 · · Score: 1

    You have reports of cruelty to animals, and widespread rumors of lab engineered chickens (albeit untrue), and THIS is what you spend your money on? Instead of pointless junk that doesn't serve any purpose other than get your name in the Guinness book of World Records, about you do something useful with the money. You can start by doing research to come up with a type of grease that WON'T kill your customers.

    You can't be serious...

  104. Reading the regional development plan by timotten · · Score: 1

    I think someone at KFC marketing misread a coordinate while reviewing the plans for the Vogon's new hyperspace highway.

  105. Area 51 has moved? by farquharsoncraig · · Score: 1

    Area 51 is in New Mexico, not Nevada. Way to screw it up for the aliens.

    1. Re:Area 51 has moved? by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      No, it's in Nevada. Roswell is in New Mexico...

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    2. Re:Area 51 has moved? by farquharsoncraig · · Score: 1

      I guess I should CTFW (Check the fine Wikipedia) before trying to sound authoritative.

  106. Archaeologists by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

    In 1000 years, archaeologists will look at this logo and conclude that it must have had some sort of religious significance.

  107. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He just said what the rest of us were thinking.

  108. I respectfully disagree by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 1

    I would say that the first company logo seen from space or even anywhere in the solar system would have to be Orion pictures. BTW, Orion, is that movie company that models its logo after that Irish constellation O'Ryan.

    BTM

    --
    That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
  109. IT'S A TRICK!!!! Alien brothers keep away! by UberMongoose · · Score: 1

    I don't think it's a coincidence that is appears near Area 51 either. It's bait, everyone knows what they do to aliens at Area 51...

  110. 1000s of years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For millenniums people (or other beings, who would know) have created images on the surface of Earth... for example, those pictures of people and horses in England, or hummingbirds in South America in Peru, so called Nazca lines. This KFC is a new thing in that it is meant to be visible in Google maps and is for human audience. Its interesting to think that those ancient figures may have been made to communicate with ETs, since its probable those people may have seen flying things, as people see today.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazca_Lines

  111. Shut up desert trash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're fucking WEEDS, you trailer trash.

  112. I never really seriously wanted to be an actuary by patio11 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... but insuring marketing innovations like "If this logo gets hit by a falling space station then everyone in America gets a taco" must be like the career-crowning capstone of the profession. "Bah, any idiot can underwrite a life-insurance policy for a 36 year old male nonsmoker. Its the REAL men who can just close their eyes and say, yep, I know what the risk of getting plastered by satellite debris is. Incidentally, $234 premium for coverage through the end of the year on a $200 million policy with a $150 deductible. NEXT."

  113. Now that's takeout! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they think that the guys in the International Space Station are going to phone for takeout they're being wildly ambitious.

  114. A bit of a let down.. by taybay · · Score: 0

    When I first read the headline, I got excited to see orbiting billboards in the night sky! I guess I interpreted it wrong..

  115. wtf? by woolio · · Score: 1

    such as ... Howard Johnson's (HoJo).

    Erm, I don't want to know which HoJo Howard is sticking his Johnson into...

    What the hell were they thinking??

    1. Re:wtf? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for anyone else but I've certainly never heard of howard johnson's being called hojo. Although, to be honest, the last three times (at least) I heard the words (names) "howard" and "johnson" together, I was watching blazing saddles. I don't even know what a howard johnson's is, is it a restaurant or a hotel? Or a clothing store, for all I know? What a stupid example.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:wtf? by default+luser · · Score: 1

      I don't even know what a howard johnson's is, is it a restaurant or a hotel?

      It's both.

      HoJo was, at one time, more ubiquitous then McDonalds. It was an American pop-culture icon in the 1960s and 70s (for example, the mention in Blazing Saddles, or the Howard Johnson's hotel on the space station in Kubrick's "2001"). Now, it's just a shell of its former self.

      Amazing how quickly a universal reference can become irrelevant.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

  116. Yet another reason for aliens to attack us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had the idea about 10 years ago to sell a plan to put corporate logos on the moon, ie, Coca Cola, so that every aboriginal tribe around the world no matter where would look at night and see that. I then realized, such a thing is total blasphemy, an abomination, and a descration of the moon our ancestors gazed upon with wonder for thousands of years. Therefore, I told no one of such a horrid idea. I now see, with the popularity of Google Earth, such ideas grotesque ideas are coming to fruition.

  117. Now All We Have To Do Is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Develop ftl, go set off a few novas in the shape of the Coca Cola logo and...and...oh, smeg it all.

  118. Amen (was re:Time for a new right...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You aren't alone. "Adbusters" magazine may be a little too far to the left for most libertarians, but they regularly report on the increasingly negative mental effects that nonstop/saturation advertising seems to be having on many people in our society. Ignore the politics of the magazine & follow the peer-reviewed research they cite. It's scary stuff.

  119. Sadly... by woolio · · Score: 1

    Am I alone in thinking that advertising should be restricted to certain public spaces designated as 'commercial',

    Well, isn't virtually almost all commercial advertising done on private property?

    Yes, the road is public... But the store window/sign is on private property... I bet the same goes for billboards. I'm not sure about the air... (Land ownership includes underground, maybe also above?!?!?)

    We DO have advertisments on blimps...Fortunately, blimps have long stopped being the latest fad.

    You can't just paint a pair of golden arches on the interstate pavement and expect to get away with it... Problem is, open-markets and capitalism allow the golden-arch owning people to have lots of 'restaurants'. They exist in sufficient numbers for that to be advertising in itself! (besides the butt-load of other advertising they actually do).

    Yes, I hope we don't ever have "painted ads on the moon"/" billboards"... Sadly, I'm not sure it can be reasonably prevented. But for the immediate future, all they need to do is buy land on the top of a hill and make a really big "Hollywood" style sign.

  120. take it to the next level by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So who wants to get started on building the giant visible-from-space goatse?

  121. Maybe genetic engineering can solve the problem... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 2, Funny
    Heh, It will be fun to see "kosher pork".

    a) Define "pork", using the bible, of course.

    b) Genetically engineer pigs enough so that they no longer match "a"

    c) Profit!

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  122. Kentucky Fried Chicken, from a McDonalds perspecti by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Kentucky Fried Chicken" was changed to KFC back in 1991! You may or may not have heard the rumor that they were forced to change the name to KFC because the FDA said their chicken was not longer chicken... but apparently that is not true.

    Yeah, that's absolute idiocy. I was working for McDonalds at the time, back in high school, and we had the same bullshit: "The patties are 100% pure beef" implied that we'd created/purchased a company called "100% Pure Beef". We didn't; the supplier (name a Canadian or American national meat packaging company) and the ingredients were marked clearly on the box: beef. Some even stated province: Pure Alberta Beef. 100% Ontario Beef. New York's finest Dead Cow. (OK, the last one was a joke... d'Uh)) The fact is (and as a former manager, a position to which I was promoted quickly because I actually showed up on time and *most* days liked my co-workers, customers and my job) McDonald's hamburgers are a higher grade of beef (Cdn AAA) than you can usually buy in the supermarket. That's lower fat than is commonly available to consumers. And it's very important to McDonalds - higher fat would be bad for the cooking process (admittedly not an open flame, unfortunately) and for the dietary disclosures now required. Throw a 1/4 pound of top-end premium ground into a frying pan, and I guarantee you'll get more fat than if you threw a *half* pound of uncooked McDonalds quarter-patties in the pan. (Try a few McDonalds, tell them you're on some sort of my-parents-were-idiot-hippies raw beef diet, sooner or later one of them will let you have uncooked patties. American or Canadian, I'll bet money than 1/2 pound of McDonalds patties gives less fat than 1/4 of extra-lean grocery store beef.)

    As for KFC, all you need to do is bite into it to know it's chicken. I don't know what sort of scientifically (and culinarily) inept uncircumcised inbred NDP-voter started the rumor that "KFC can't call themselves KFC because they don't serve chicken", but it's really sufficiently asinine that the offender shouldn't be allowed to vote or procreate. If you disagree, there's a great B-Movie (sparsely available by Torrents, etc.) called "The Willies" - you'll enjoy the Tennessee Fricassee Chicken scene for sure.

    I can't speak for the PETA comments against KFC, which I hope are the usual PETA bullshit. I am a carnivore but I feel for anything with a nervous system - but I will remind you that PETA has been right on occasion. OTOH, if there were anything more stupid than chicken, it would be called a "plant", it would breathe carbon dioxide, and it would think George Bush was a terrific President.

    Yes, KFC is chicken. Yes, it's fried. Yes, the founder was from Kentucky. If you're too stupid to understand that the K and the F became liabilities with the diet craze(s) (whatever happened to *moderation*, you know, like us adults do), you don't deserve to breathe or breed.

    But so long as you money is still real, "Can I take your order?" (We don't even want to get into my experiences with fat people: "Double Big Mac combo, large sized, large soft drink... better make it a Diet Coke, I'm trying to lose weight..." Me, screaming in my mind at the top of my lungs: "THEN MAKE THIS YOUR WEEKLY NOT DAILY TREAT TO YOURSELF, GET AN ACTIVE HOBBY, AND CUT OFF THE BON-BONS, YOU FUCKING HIDEOUS AND STINKY BEACHED WHALE." Spoken: "Oh yes, a Diet Coke will do *wonders* for your physique." - if they were any dumber, or if I were a commissioned salesperson, I'd tell them I was gay and sell them a *simply fabulous* pair of culottes and a front-load washer - they're dumb enough to trust "diet" over common sense, so they must be dumb enough to trust a cute little rubber door seal over gravity.)

    Finally, say what you want about KFC, but sometimes I just get a craving for it - it's damned good (except when you go to a sucky franchise whose left it under the heat lamps too long, in which case it's only slightly better than cafeteria food). KFC, aside from their proprietary seasonings,

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  123. VLAD FARTED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the US government recently used a radar gun to clock the volume of vlad's farts, 8000 decibels! christ on a cracker lockwood you ought to be shot!!!!

  124. Honestly... by blurby+blurb+blurb · · Score: 1

    who fucking cares?

    --
    Blah, blah, blah...whatever... We're all such losers for caring so much about this stuff in the first place, right?
  125. Re:Maybe genetic engineering can solve the problem by fossa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Looks like an allowable animal must both chew the cud and have a cloven hoof. Pigs have a cloven hoof but don't chew the cud. So, force the pig to chew the cud and you're ok? Some parts of "the law" strike me more as a guide for surviving in the desert in ancient times rather than arbitrary rules to follow. For example, Basically, the Dietary Law is a prohibition against eating scavenger animals. The article goes on about how the more complex digestive system of grazing animals leads to less toxicity in the meat. Perhaps farm pigs fed a controlled diet should be considered "clean".

  126. Define visible... by waterford0069 · · Score: 1
    Define visible ...with the naked eye? ...with a camera lens?

    I'm sure many football (North American, and the rest of the world) have their logo's visible from space. E.g., This year's Grey Cup location.

  127. XXX visible from space. by sbaker · · Score: 1

    Oh - PLEASE - not another "the first XXX visible from space" thing.

    What exactly does that mean? We were told that The Great Wall of
    China was the only human construction visible from space...that
    didn't mean anything either.

    We have commercial satellites that can comfortably resolve 1/2 meter
    features and unclassified military photos down to maybe 10cm - and I'm
    pretty sure there must be classified stuff that's better than that.

    So - almost any large-ish store sign (say a McDonalds golden arches)
    will be "visible from space".

    Perhaps they mean "Naked eye visible from space".

    The conventional definition for the altitude at which space "starts"
    is 100km. At that altitude, with our eyes able to resolve about 1/12th
    of a degree, at 100km we can resolve something that's 100km * tan(1/12 degrees)
    which is 0.145 km - 145 meters. So this sign is about 20km across
    - yep, you can definitely see that "from space" with your naked eye.
    Of course you'd be able to see one that was MUCH smaller than that - a
    logo that was around half a kilometer across would be visible too - so
    KFC could have saved themselves some money!

    I'd be surprised if there were no company logos more than 145m across
    in the world - but I can't find any - so maybe KFC do get the award for
    being first - but I'd be surprised if that were true.

    This turkish flag: http://members.tripod.com/kibrisevi/ozel/Bbayrak.h tm
    is big enough to see with the naked eye from space...but it's not a
    company logo. You'd be (just) able to tell it was there - but you
    couldn't resolve the design on it unaided.

    --
    www.sjbaker.org
    1. Re:XXX visible from space. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's easy to see a line of motorway lights from space... if you want a "visible from space" logo, just use a lot of neon.

  128. The venerable Kernel !! by ManyLostPackets · · Score: 1

    The venerable Kernel!
    enjoyed now and by future boxer rebellion types
    (guess the Neal Stephenson novel)

  129. Correction: It's *NOT* visible from space. by sbaker · · Score: 1

    Oops! I misread the article. I read 65,000 one foot tiles and mindlessly translated that as "65,000' across"....silly me.

    I'm sorry...

    So it's ACTUALLY more like sqrt(65000) feet across. Well, that's under 80 meters - and it needs to be 145m across if you're going to see it at all from space. But even then, it would be a pinkish spec - you wouldn't be able to see what it was.

    Bah - this is B.S.

    Oh - and the altitude of 100km for the lower edge of space came from Wikipedia: "The Kármán line lies at an altitude of 100 km above the Earth's surface, and is commonly used to define the boundary between the Earth's atmosphere and outer space. This definition is accepted by the Fédération Aéronautique Internationale (FAI), which is an international standard setting and record-keeping body for aeronautics and astronautics."

    --
    www.sjbaker.org
  130. Milliways by jagdish · · Score: 1

    Now they should rename themselves to Milliways.

  131. Don't provoke them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's just hope that no violent and hateful chicken-like alien race will see and understand it.

  132. Fake... by farnsaw · · Score: 1

    Does this not appear fake to anyone else? Especially the picture from "space". Note that the ground around the logo is blank and not the normal scrub brush you would find in the desert and can clearly see outside the blank area. Even the construction picture looks fake and there is no link to the video.

    Ah, well. I must admire the advertising firm who came up with this. All the credit and exposure they would have gotten from actually doing this without the expense... Oh, and they didn't have the environmental impact people are complaining about either.

    --
    "Computer Scientists can count to 1024 on their fingers" (non-mutant, non-mutilatated, human computer scientists)
  133. Nazca by beda · · Score: 0

    Now we finally know what the strange drawings on the plains of Nazca probably meant.

  134. What A Great Frackin' Race We Are... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Fast food logo on one side of the planet, people dying of starvation on the other.

    I hope any intelligent aliens out there that see "The Colonel" in all his corporate glory, just drive on by...

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  135. CATERPILLAR by tjw · · Score: 1
    Similar to the STUDEBAKER tree sign, there was also this at the Caterpillar proving grounds in AZ:

    http://www.googlesightseeing.com/index.php?s=cater pillar

    Although this one has been erased in the name of housing development.

    --

    XJS*C4JDBQADN1.NSBN3*2IDNEN*GTUBE-STANDARD-ANTI-UB E-TEST-EMAIL*C.34X
  136. How long till... by SIInudeity · · Score: 1

    Coca Cola puts up a HUGE billboard on the visible side of the moon?

  137. How long before the opposite is true? by C4st13v4n14 · · Score: 0

    How long before they start building these things in space? Soon we'll all be looking at giant KFC advertisements in the sky. You won't be able to take a photograph of a nice sunset or the aurora borealis without a giant neon sign of "McDonald's" in the background.

  138. Location by dgbrownnt · · Score: 1

    Not sure if anyone put in the coords: 37 38' 45", 115 45' 3"

    That puts it right next to the Little A'Le'Inn in Rachel, Nevada. Google Earth and Maps don't have a hi-res of the area. Windows Live Maps has a b&w map of the area, but it looks old (but it's definitely the place).

  139. Re:Kentucky Fried Chicken, from a McDonalds perspe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I certainly don't eat it every day - most days, I deep fry my chicken or beef roasting flank my own way. (Note that I also chain smoke, drink six to twelve 355mL bottles of beer a day and bike *eight miles each way* to work except when the weather is crappy - I'm thin, svelte, and my cholesterol is good... but I must be some sort of heretofore unknown medical time bomb.)
    No, you are the fucking MAN and the world owes you a shrine. One day, PETA and John Basedow will protest against your very existance. Steve McQueen would shed a tear for you.
  140. Blessings of the state. Blessings of the masses. by piranha(jpl) · · Score: 1

    Let us be thankful we have commerce. Buy more. Buy more now. Buy more and be happy.

  141. The horror... by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

    That's all i can say.

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
  142. Hello Kitty did this a year ago by klokie · · Score: 1

    In July 2005 Sanrio commissioned Surface to Air to make a Hello Kitty crop circle near Stonehenge, to celebrate Hello Kitty's 30th birthday. It's approximately the size of the Colonel's greasy nose.

  143. kfc is evil by dogsucks · · Score: 1

    Surprised they didn't carve it out of the jungle in Madagascar. One of the most unique ecosystems (or what is left of it) is being destroyed by KFC and its huge chicken farming operations.

  144. Spamming Google Maps!?! by Slipgrid · · Score: 1

    Hey, a new way to spam Google.

  145. "Visible From Space" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, visible from Space?

    Someone's getting "Space" and "An Aircraft" confused. Because you sure as hell COULD NOT see that from space.

    1. Re:"Visible From Space" by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Depends what you mean by "see" and by "space".

      At 100km (the official edge of space), the human eye has a resolution of about 30m. 2 acres as a square is roughly 80m each side. So you'll see there's something there, but be unable to identify what.

  146. Great, now all aliens will be able to see by unity100 · · Score: 1

    how we brutally slaughter chicken for taste.

    Who knows, some might think that this is a 'free for all' planet, and might decide to help themselves ... with ...

  147. How about by negyvenot · · Score: 1

    The firefox crop circle in oregon? Was it big enough to be visible from space?

  148. Not visible in google.maps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the place in google.maps, the logo is supposed to be just in the centre: http://maps.google.es/maps?f=q&hl=es&q=s&ie=UTF8&o m=1&z=14&ll=37.642986,-115.746546&spn=0.032351,0.0 86517&t=k&iwloc=addr

  149. Corporate Advertising by lobiusmoop · · Score: 0

    "When deep space exploration ramps up, it'll be the corporations that name everything, the IBM Stellar Sphere, the Microsoft Galaxy, Planet Starbucks."

    --
    "I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
  150. Revenue increase by jac89 · · Score: 1

    Well at least now the 2-3 astronauts in the ISS will be added to the KFC customer base... I guess the next step is to build a KFC outlet on the ISS itself.

  151. KFC ad by opencode · · Score: 1

    during which time the logo design pieces were kept hidden and under cover from identified and unidentified flying objects.

    >>>Doesn't this defeat the purpose of the advertisement? I would've thought KFC *wants* fly-by's to see the ad.

    --
    "He who questions training trains himself at asking questions." - The Sphinx, Mystery Men (1999)
  152. It's not really the first, is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about Tower 42, built for the Natwest bank in the shape of their logo? The KFC boys are at least 27 years behind

  153. Re:Kentucky Fried Chicken, from a McDonalds perspe by kayditty · · Score: 1
    I certainly don't eat it every day - most days, I deep fry my chicken or beef roasting flank my own way. (Note that I also chain smoke, drink six to twelve 355mL bottles of beer a day and bike *eight miles each way* to work except when the weather is crappy - I'm thin, svelte, and my cholesterol is good... but I must be some sort of heretofore unknown medical time bomb.)
    uhh.. so what the hell are you saying? people should smoke cigarettes, drink beer, and eat disgusting fried foods if they want to? okay, sure, but, just so you know, one exception doesn't make the rule. I'm not saying what you do is somehow 'unhealthy,' though it sure is fucking disgusting. however, I find it odd that you assume you're healthy when I make the assumption that your knowledge of proper 'health' practices is low. for instance, you may have a 'good cholesterol' (whatever that even means; I think maybe you watch too much TV to have come to the conclusion that "cholesterol" level is some sort of testament to bodily health), and you may be skinny as an anorexic cheerleader. more importantly, though, do you have an overly active metabolism? there are plenty of people who do, and there are plenty of people who have a slow metabolism; people come with different characteristics -- strange, I know. I don't pretend to know anything about it, but isn't it somewhat common knowledge (and maybe it's misinformation -- again, I don't know) that smoking cigarettes will cause 'weight loss?' the more relevant thing to look at when it comes to physical fitness is body fat percentage, and not just body weight. I'm also wondering whether you've taken into account anything other than what's puppeted daily on television and the common attitude toward what constitutes physical fitness. physical fitness certainly doesn't constitute [good] health, and cholesterol level certainly doesn't, either. what is your resting heart rate? blood pressure? do you have chronic pain? any diseae, illness, or other affliction? are you more prone to permanent injury than others? do you heal more slowly than others? is your immune system working properly? what are your enzyme levels? your hormone levels? do you lose muscle mass more rapidly than others? will you when you age? I'm not trying to answer these questions for you; I don't know the answers to them, and I don't think anyone can predict what will happen to someone in the future based upon their activities -- that is a copout. I am just wondering whether you're actually as healthy as you seem to assume yourself to be. many people don't really understand the many things that health encompasses. I'm not sure it necessarily pays to be so cynical, though. we accept many things science tells us as truth, because it benefits us to do so. it may also benefit us to be more accepting to what the medical field tells us about nutrition, exercise, and health, no matter how much we don't want to hear it. personally, I would refrain from KFC, fried foods, alcohol, and cigarettes -- if not for health, then just because they're completely nasty. your mileage may vary.
  154. Uh, why? by RockDoctor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why, as in why did the editors think this was worthy of condemning electrons to potential-drop hell? And as in why did the KFC marketing 'droids think that this would do something worthwhile for their corporate masters.
    When did I last subject myself to a KFC? Probably not in the last decade or two. Do I feel motivated to rush out and partake of small bits of bony chicken drenched in greasy batter? Uh, no.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    1. Re:Uh, why? by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      Do I feel motivated to rush out and partake of small bits of bony chicken drenched in greasy batter?
      Coming from Scotland, I wouldn't be too smug about fried crap in batter...Mars bar anyone?
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  155. Nazca Lines - These Guys were First by giafly · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Nazca Lines were first, and much bigger. The picture at bottom left is even a baby chicken. Or a moose upside down.

    --
    Reduce, reuse, cycle
  156. Also the Whipsnade Lion dates from 1933 by giafly · · Score: 1

    The Whipsnade Lion was built in 1933 to indicate the position of Whipsnade wildlife park. Aerial Picture.

    --
    Reduce, reuse, cycle
  157. It's been done before by kinnell · · Score: 1

    Nice try KFC, but it's been done before

    --
    If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
  158. Earlier than that -- try the 1940s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about the American logo, easily visible from space, in August 1945 in the region of Hiroshima, Japan -- a feat repeated a few days later at Nagasaki. Amazing -- American ingenuity! ..sorry, I'm in a dark mood today.

  159. Re:Kentucky Fried Chicken, from a McDonalds perspe by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    It is generally given in the US that the higher the grade of beef, the higher the fat content (seen as marbling) for a particular cut. That said, higher dollar primals generally have less fat than standard ground beef becuase most primals are trimmed prior to grinding (get a whole sirloin roast ground, and it should be in the 12-15% fat range, iirc, vs 30% for standard ground beef).

    Unverified (by me) rumors have it that McDonalds (among others) intentionally introduces older livestock into the beef to keep the cost down, which also would keep the fat content down (as older animals have less fat). I would not doubt it.

    As for KFC - yes, of course it's chicken.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  160. KFC logo in space ... by jmansfield · · Score: 1

    If they really want to bring aliens in for KFC, they'll have to figure a way to get the *smell* of KFC to disseminate more widely through the solar system ;-)

  161. Google Earth's placemark by jhufgty · · Score: 1

    Here's Google Earth's placemark for this: http://www.soretoga.com.ar/KFC_Space_Logo.kmz

  162. mmm.... chicken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new chicken-loving overlords.

  163. Its been done. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought I saw one on Mars.

  164. Re:Kentucky Fried Chicken, from a McDonalds perspe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your post was utterly unreadable.

  165. Re:Kentucky Fried Chicken, from a McDonalds perspe by Chris+whatever · · Score: 1

    the beef in the in burger at mcdonalds maybe a 100% beef but it's the other ingredient people are scared of.

    As for KFC near area 51,,,i guess everything goes when you try to get aliens to visit us. Seti aint working so let's try plain advertising

  166. There's always one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget the chicken. I don't think the Dead Chook Inc logo rates as a first. Check out Google Earth at -32.216903, 125.360089. Caiguna, Australia is the nearest, um, place. It's about 13km to the south east of the logo. For the geographically challenged, do a Fly To Caiguna, Australia. Zoom out to an eye alt of about 40km. Towards the top left of the satellite image you'll see a diagonal track that crosses a vertical track. Go to the bottom of the vertical track and zoom in.

    Done in about 1965 and a bit faded since it was last touched up but at 3.2km long it's big and as far as I'm concerned it's a compay logo since its what used to be on the cement trucks. It used to show up in satellite images quite clearly but has faded a lot now.

  167. Re:Klingon Fried Crispy by 3chuck3 · · Score: 1

    Actually thought Kentucky Fried had to change the name because they where not longer using what would be considered "Chicken". KFC had moved to using vat grown beakless, feetless, featherless genetic combination of Chicken, Turkey, Goose, and Squirel (for favor)

    Neo-Poultry: it is better for you

  168. Kenny?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have we forgotten about that giant red sun in the shape of a chicken on the upper west side of manhattan that was breifly visible from space in the late 90s.

  169. Re:Kentucky Fried Chicken, from a McDonalds perspe by Creepy · · Score: 1

    In high school I had a friend that made manager at McDonalds in 6 months and was running the place at 8 months, so saying you're a former McDonalds manager doesn't mean much. I imagine the turnover had to be huge for him to advance so quickly, though. I don't remember ever having much of a problem with turnover or people showing up on time when I was working at a restaurant, but maybe you just get a lot more of the dregs of society in fast food. OTOH, he was getting paid almost 3 times what I was before heading off to college and had management experience, something I didn't get until many years later.

    Seems to me a Big Mac, fries, and a diet coke was 2 points over my weight on the weight watcher's chart - that's for food in a day, not a single meal. Thankfully I haven't had a craving for one of those since 1996 when I barfed one up on choppy seas (getting SCUBA certified).

    I rarely eat KFC, but I recall they had a problem with being high in trans-fats, which are known to cause health problems. I'm sure it isn't as bad as health problems related to chain smoking, so you should be fine (yes, that was a feeble attempt at sarcasm).

    Let me guess... you drink 6-12 355mL bottles of Miller Lite, right ;)

  170. Visible from space? For whom? by xPsi · · Score: 1

    While I appreciate the twisted aspect of this article and the depressing message it contains, I do think the term "visible from space" is being a bit abused here. Visible to whom under what conditions? Certainly not to space shuttle astronauts with the naked eye (even The Great Wall, which is REALLY big, isn't visible in that way -- nor is the CITY of New York during the day!). And certainly to Them (whomever They may be), the old KFC sign on the corner down the street was ALREADY visible from space using Some Technology....

    --
    i\hbar\dot{\psi}=\hat{H}\psi
  171. Visable from Planes too! by genghis_1971 · · Score: 1

    I think the view from the plane would be the targetted audience.

  172. Re:Kentucky Fried Chicken, from a McDonalds perspe by drew · · Score: 1
    OTOH, if there were anything more stupid than chicken, it would be called a "plant", it would breathe carbon dioxide, and it would think George Bush was a terrific President.


    No, there is at least one animal dumber than a chicken, and at least here in the states we are all getting ready to celebrate it's stupidity by making it the main course of next Thursday's dinner.

    (And for the record, gravity or not, front load washers are the greatest advance in laundry since running water. They can clean twice the clothes with a quarter of the water (or less) and half the detergent. The water level never actually gets above the seal anyway- that just keeps it from splashing out.)
    --
    If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
  173. Its a BRILIANT idea... by crovira · · Score: 1

    It will save the planet.

    Think of your own reaction to driving past some dismal greasy spoon on the highway.

    That's what you DO. You drive past.

    The aliens will figure there's nothing good to eat and motor on through.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  174. Soon to be followed by.... by dredson · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...the first graffiti visible from space?

  175. Re:Kentucky Fried Chicken, from a McDonalds perspe by Alioth · · Score: 1

    Door seals on a front loading washer is a solved problem by the way (in some nations, solved in the 1970s). Sticking with pre-historic top loading twin tubs wasting water and using four or five times the energy - well, that really is stupidity :-)

  176. Re:Kentucky Fried Chicken, from a McDonalds perspe by danpsmith · · Score: 1
    I certainly don't eat it every day - most days, I deep fry my chicken or beef roasting flank my own way. (Note that I also chain smoke, drink six to twelve 355mL bottles of beer a day and bike *eight miles each way* to work except when the weather is crappy - I'm thin, svelte, and my cholesterol is good... but I must be some sort of heretofore unknown medical time bomb.)

    I didn't want to have to reply to this, I really didn't, but I read one of the replies that didn't make the point I was after. Smoking causes lung cancer and emphysema, it's proven scientific fact. It's not really a question of bias. Even if your cholesterol is as good as you imply, there's simply no way cigarettes and excess alcohol intake is healthy. Now maybe you offset the cardiovascular effects that cigarette smoking has on your overall health in the short term, but in the end its bad effects will get you. I really don't mind when people smoke heavily or drink heavily as long as they acknowledge the facts that these things are poisons. I used to drink and smoke heavily myself, and I still drink a fair amount. But I don't pretend it's good for me just because I do it without dying or adversely affecting my health statistics. Scientists and doctors don't know everything about health and diet, sure, but they definitely know some things. So don't delude yourself into thinking you are smarter than the entire medical community because you haven't yet experienced any personal repercussions.

    --
    Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.
  177. You realize what this means... by rholland356 · · Score: 1

    This means that your rooftop can now be rented out as advertising space.

    This is made possible by Google Earth and the other satellite mapping services.

    I wonder how long it will be before the local high school seniors rearrange the Colonel into something a little more, shall we say, anti-establishment?

    Serious question: how do you know when the satellite will take the next snapshot? It's been a few years around my neck of the woods.

  178. wikipedia is your researching friend by 0jjjjjjjjjj0 · · Score: 1

    Nullarbor. While a little local knowledge wouldn't go astray, neither would a quick look at an atlas or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nullarbor_plain wiki ...

    --
    WANRING: This warning is misspelt.
  179. Re:Kentucky Fried Chicken, from a McDonalds perspe by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Spoken: "Oh yes, a Diet Coke will do *wonders* for your physique."

    You've got a great point, but consider the effect a large coke has on your body. Let us take a look at Ye Olde nutrition index. A Big Mac has 560 calories, and 47 grams of carbohydrates. A large coke has 310 calories, resulting from 86g of carbohydrates (all sugars.)

    If you ate the kind of meal I usually eat when I eat at McD's, you'd have a couple of McChickens and a diet coke. The coke has no nutritional value, although I still think the jury is out on nutrasweet. And the McChickens have 370 calories, a little under half of which are from fat. Whee. But a large coke would have just as many calories as one of those, and I'd get half again more calories. 640 calories, on the other hand, is not unreasonable for lunch on a 2000 calorie diet.

    But actually, carbohydrates have a greater impact on your body than fat. It is healthier for you to eat 600 calories of fat than 600 calories of carbohydrates. First, even saturated fat raises both your HDL and LDL levels. On its own, eating lard would probably not elevate your cholesterol score as a result of this. But carbs kick your pancreas into gear, and huge influxes of "ready" carbohydrates are the most damaging influence. In addition, your brain decides whether or not you are hungry based on glucose levels. Over time it becomes resistant to glucose and it takes more and more carbs to feel full. This leads to a vicious cycle of addiction that frequently leads to obesity. However, as you are putting ever-increasing loads on your pancreas, it is likely (but AFAIK not yet conclusively proven, only very strongly indicated) that this is the cause of the diabetes epidemic in the US. Apparently now India is also experiencing the same effects as their economy heats up and more people eat more processed foods, which are typically carb-heavy and have tons of added sugar, to improve both flavor and shelf life. Take a look at hot dog packages sometime and count carbohydrates if you want to know how much of the meat you buy is actually meat...

    Of course you are quite correct that eating a big mac and a large fries is, as you say, more than pretty much anyone should be eating. In fact, back in the olden days, McDonalds only had one size of french fry, and it was what we now call a "small". This is all irrelevant to me however, because I can remember when they had crispy french fries that someone might actually want to eat, which was much more recently... and I won't bother to even eat their damned fries now.

    But the bottom line is that saying that the diet coke is irrelevant is like saying that you shouldn't care if you get stabbed when you've just been shot, because you already have a more serious wound.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  180. offended by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    kfc isn't slimy. if you get the original, its just breaded chicken. its the crunchy that's a bit greasy. its fried chicken, what do you expect?

    anyways its good.

  181. Some company already proposed this garbage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recall a while back some company did propose to launch a huge , foldable billboard in space with
    a symbol on it which would appear on cetrain products, and be viewable worldwide in the night sky.
    They even tried to sweeten the deal by saying that it would have an instrument platform on it.
        It never did get off the ground (pun intended), and just the very idea sparked a huge outcry.

  182. 1 way ticket to the moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #The cheapest way to do that would be to send a robot up there to paint it.

      And the guy who spawns this should go up there with the robot to stay, because he sure as hell won't be safe on Earth anymore after this stunt.

  183. Re:Maybe genetic engineering can solve the problem by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 1

    > b) Genetically engineer pigs enough so that they no longer match "a"

    You might want to check out Harry Turtledove's short story The R Strain, in which this exact thing happens.

  184. Eva was tiny, KFC is only 10x larger by ear1grey · · Score: 1

    For an advert to be "visible from space" it must be distinguishable and recognizable by the naked human eye from 62 miles up.

    The article says approximately 65000 1 foot tiles were used, that's almost certainly a 256x256 square making 65535 tiles.

    If each tile is 1ft across, then the total size is actually 256 feet (78m) squared.

    The Eva advert was 697m2, and could certainly not be seen from space.

    The KFC ad is 6084m2, 10x larger, but is still only vaguely unlikely to be visible with the naked eye.

    To try and imagine the visibility a bit better, scale it down (78m wide & 62 miles becomes 1.4m wide at 1 mile), so paint the KFC sign on a 1.4m x 1.4m board and see if it can be recognized from 1 mile away. The scaling calculation is fairly easy, but what it can't factor in is the fact that there's 62x more atmosphere to look through when you scale back up. I'll believe it when I see it (from space).

  185. Attack of the Liberals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah yeah yeah, so predictable... Slashdot will tell us how Organic friendly we should all be and that we are disgusting if we eat at KFC. What a bunch of arrogant pukes. I like fried chicken and your rabbit-pellet pasty, sickly white vegan physique is more than enough reason for me to keep eating it. My god, what a bunch of freaking babies this site has become.

  186. Inaccurate I believe by M0b1u5 · · Score: 1

    I do not believe it is of sufficient size to be visible by the naked eye from low earth orbit.

    Just because some fool said it is visible, doesn't make it so.

    --
    How many escape pods are there? "NONE,SIR!" You counted them? "TWICE, SIR!"
  187. Re:Kentucky Fried Chicken, from a McDonalds perspe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You a crazy man.

  188. Orbital Logos by zenofjazz · · Score: 1

    Unfolds? Try dropping back and punting to the original satellite methodology.. The first american satellite that was used for communication was a giant silvered balloon, that radio was bounced off of. Scale that up to something say 5 miles across, that, uninflated, fits in the payload bay of the shuttle. Inflate it with a gas that will fit in a small space. Launch to orbit, eject satellite. Allow time for orbits to separate sufficiently, then inflate. When the orbit decays, light material like mylar will burn up on re-entry.

    --
    -- All That's Evil in the Geek Space ... Allthatsevil.wordpress.com
  189. Visible from space? by bynary · · Score: 1

    Define "visible from space"? We've had satellites that can read license plate numbers from space for something like 30 years. I think what they meant was "world's first really big, flat logo out in the desert that you can see using Google Earth if you zoom in really, really close".

    Things that are visible from outerspace:
    The Himalayas
    New York City
    Bill O'Reilly's ego

    Things that are not visible from outerspace:
    KFC logo in the desert

    --
    http://www.bynarystudio.com
  190. That's from an AIRPLANE not from SPACE, dude. by Medievalist · · Score: 1

    Google maps uses flyover data. You can see the shadow of the airplane in many shots.

    Your backyard is not locatable/visible from space, unless you have Seekret Military Technology or an extremely shiny backyard. In either case your Google Maps data is not from satellites once you've zoomed in enough to see your yard.

    Look it up, I'm serious.