Slashdot Mirror


Opening Zune Sales Flaccid

An anonymous reader writes "As 'Black Friday' approaches and consumers line up for the Playstation 3 it looks like Zune has become an afterthought. Despite months of hype, opening Zune sales are only so-so. While Zune did reach the top 10 on Amazon's Top 25 list for electronic product sales on its first day, it quickly fell below the top 15 and continues to drop. Six separate iPod models now outsell it as well as SanDisk's e250 player. In-store sales are not much better."

451 comments

  1. Welcome to the social? by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hello from Seattle. Hello? Anybody here?

    1. Re:Welcome to the social? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If it wasnt for slashdot, i wouldnt even know what a zune is.

    2. Re:Welcome to the social? by Technician · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hello from Seattle. Hello? Anybody here?

      Seattle is fine with lots of people, traffic jam problems, beautiful countryside, the sound, etc. A short ways East in Redmond might be a diffrent story.

      More seriously, Yet another incompatible lower feature format.. Get a clue. Trading very restrictive DRM in another incompatible format for a taste of Wi-Fi is not a selling point.

      The only selling point for middle school kids is there is no DRM on photos. They can be transfered wirelessly. This is the hot new way to share porn.

      Parents and teachers are not ammused.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    3. Re:Welcome to the social? by davidmcg · · Score: 1

      Me, me. An American friend sent me one as they thought I'd be interested in it (I'd have preferred a PS3 ;)). Of course over in the UK the social networking is even more useless as the chance of finding someone else to peer with is very low. So it's not going to displace my iPod, but in some ways it's good to have a device that's not even launched in your own country yet. I may keep it for the odd time I want to use the video screen or I may just pass it on to someone with no MP3 player already

    4. Re:Welcome to the social? by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Soon they will be changing it to "Goodbye from Seattle".

    5. Re:Welcome to the social? by yo_tuco · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Soon they will be changing it to 'Goodbye from Seattle'"

      If you are Matt Jubelirer, product manager for the Zune project, you are probably Sleepless in Seattle right about now.

    6. Re:Welcome to the social? by bbagnall · · Score: 1

      Did anyone see the official Zune website? I think having photos of people I would never want to hang out with in a million years probably isn't good marketing. I mean really, those people just looked lame and spastic.

    7. Re:Welcome to the social? by countach · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To be outsold by iPod is to be expected. To be outsold by Sandisk is a spanking.

    8. Re:Welcome to the social? by hurting+now · · Score: 1

      Too true! SanDisk - while its a nice product, doesn't have the name recognition. It makes me wonder if this product is going to get any lift off. Christmas is coming, and I'll be surprised to see many a Zune in stockings.

    9. Re:Welcome to the social? by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually the wife and I have the Sandisk e270 and an 4gig iPOD nano. We both argue over the Sandisk, the nano is the consolation prize.

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    10. Re:Welcome to the social? by StarfishOne · · Score: 1

      The second movie title that came to my mind is: 'Something's gotta give' ;O

    11. Re:Welcome to the social? by ksheff · · Score: 2, Interesting

      true. I think I'd get a Neuros DAC instead. At least it can record WAV files from line input and has 80G of storage for the same price.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    12. Re:Welcome to the social? by Korin43 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I guess their whole "Let's not let anyone know anything about the Zune" campaign worked too well..

    13. Re:Welcome to the social? by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 1

      I'm curious to know what you like so much about the Sandisk. Does it support any non-DRM audio formats?

      --
      Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
    14. Re:Welcome to the social? by Technician · · Score: 2, Informative

      Does it support any non-DRM audio formats?

      It's an MP3 player. It also supports the MS Plays for Sure format, but that is a seldom used feature.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    15. Re:Welcome to the social? by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 4, Informative
      The Sandisk has the option of DRM or just using it as a drag and drop drive with no DRM. We use the later and just drag and drop. I didn't even install the Sandisk software until I decided to update the firmware and I've never used the software since then, still drag and drop. It's a simple toggle in the software of the device under USB Options. All I use is MP3 format (192kbps) on the Sandisk, but I know that WMA works and from experience I know that M4a doesn't (iTunes ripping for the nano). I understand that it should work with WMA and the WMA DRM, but never used those. Any other formats are beyond my knowledge or experience.

      Sound wise they're both the same to me, I'm no audiophile and I don't think I need to be for this, it's an MP3 player that goes in my pocket. As an everyday user the software on the device is pretty much the same, I'm not going to quibble over the little things. A nice thing on the Sandisk is that a quick press of the power button takes you back to the first screen from where ever you are. The screen is bigger on the Sandisk compared to the nano we have (I don't know if they changed with the last revision). Also the Sandisk has the FM tuner which makes a huge difference down the gym when watch the TV's, the nano doesn't. The sizes are equivalent to me, I don't care about a few millimeters here or there and the Sandisk has an overall better solid feel as it's slightly heavier. However, the controls on the Sandisk are not as good as the nano, the nano definitely wins out there (except for the blue light), but I pick an album and put the thing in my pocket, so tactile control feel is not that important to me. Both require USB charging, unless you pay the cash for the external chargers. The biggest plus to the Sandisk is no software required. As long as I have the cable, in the mode I have it (no-DRM) it acts just like a USB drive with the computer.

      All this is just my opinion, based on my preferences for using the two players. Other people will think differently, obviously. Oh, and I've not had any problems with lock-up on either.

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    16. Re:Welcome to the social? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the mini-review. You really ought to be modded up, but I don't have points right now.

    17. Re:Welcome to the social? by whoever57 · · Score: 1
      It also supports the MS Plays for Sure format,
      Err... no it doesn't support "plays for sure" Another link
      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    18. Re:Welcome to the social? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      You know you can use MP3 on the nano too right? Then you don't need a set of music for each player.

    19. Re:Welcome to the social? by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I used MP3's happily on my old MP3, got the nano didn't have a problem. Got the Sandisk and realized that iTunes was ripping everything in M4a. So I had to go back and convert what was done and alter iTunes ripping choice to MP3 so I could use everything on both. All's good now.

      One thing I should have said about the Sandisk that threw me for a little loop at first, until I realized, was that for some weird reason in drag and drop mode the MUSIC folder on the device is hidden, so you need to set show hidden files. Could have just been me, but that seemed silly.

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    20. Re:Welcome to the social? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      That does seem silly.

      I can understand how people want to have the drag and drop ability, but at the same time I really appreciate the iPod's ability to scroll through the metadata for a multi-gigabyte music library pretty much instantly. To do that you have to build a metadata database, and to do that you pretty much need client software.

    21. Re:Welcome to the social? by Technician · · Score: 1

      Reviewing the grandparent post..



      The parent post is regarding the Sandisk, not the Zune.

      http://reviews.cnet.com/SanDisk_Sansa_e270_6GB/450 7-6490_7-31684140.html?tag=sub

      This does play MP3 and WMA files.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    22. Re:Welcome to the social? by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      Actually, what really amused me were Engadget's account and pictures of the install process. The install screens started by looking like a Hugo Chavez rally, and then a bunch of random drunks.

      And then when the install program crashed, the legendary picture of the cute oriental girl screaming like crazy. Some people said it looked like an orgasm, others said scream. I'm on the scream side personally.

      I checked out the device at Wal*Mart and my view is that it looks cheap, especially compared to the iPod, and the advantages suggested in the promotional material were not significant. I'm surprised it's selling at all, but I guess some people just don't like Apple.

      Finally, they seem to be awfully hard on their most loyal customers.

      I find it inexplicable that they would not support existing music purchased through PlaysForSure stores. Sure, almost nobody bought it, but I would expect those people to have by far the greatest interest in a new Microsoft based music player. Rule one in customer service is not to make fools out of your best customers, who are precisely the people who bought into PlaysForSure.

      And what's with not supporting Windows Vista? Who runs Windows Vista now but the few fans Microsoft has? Who would buy the Zune, and try to popularize it, other than the few people who have decided to put the Vista beta on their machines?

      I know that if I were a Windows fan, I'd be running Vista today, and I'd be royally angry that my new Zune didn't work with it. Both those decisions are just plain hideous, and to the very users Microsoft should be pampering, not kicking in the teeth.

      It's stuff like this that makes me very glad I'm a Mac user. I don't think Apple would ever make simple, elementary mistakes like this.

      D

    23. Re:Welcome to the social? by Asrynachs · · Score: 0

      I have to agree with that. I would have figured Microsoft would have done some amazing ad campaign. So far NOTHIN. NUUUTTTTHIIINNNN. I'd like to see the ipod seriously hobbled by the Zune, but it's not gonna happen if Microsoft doesn't tell people this thing exists.

    24. Re:Welcome to the social? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical Apple cult member post. First, talk about how superior you are for using Apple and how amused you are with the competition. Brag about Apple's latest fad and how it is so superior to all else. Belittle anything not made by Apple and act like if you were in charge all products would be flawless. Apple didn't invent MP3 players you know - they just did their usual brainwashing scam (called marketing) and their loyal brainless minions all fell into place. They did the same thing with their inferior POS called the Macintosh back in 1984, even claimed they invented it when Xerox actually did. The Mac sucked for the next 15 years until they started using Linux instead (OSX). All Jobs can do is repackage someone elses ideas and do his little brainwashing on all the little Apple minions. Hey, if Steve tells you you're cool for buying his crap, well then, it must be so.

    25. Re:Welcome to the social? by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      but I guess some people just don't like Apple.

      Well, I don't like Apple, but I'll sure as hell never get a Zune. (Choosing between Apple and Microsoft is like choosing between the Spanish Inquisition and a Stalinist purge.)

      I like my iRiver. I do wonder just how furious all the 3rd party portable music device manufacturers are at Microsoft for screwing them over on the "Plays For Sure" thing. Dollars to donuts that Zune is a few months of dismal sales and one firmware update away from becoming a low-rent "Plays For Sure" device, itself.

    26. Re:Welcome to the social? by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      I'd be curious to hear what you have against Apple. They do make polished, beautifully engineered products. Sometimes they are flawed, but generally those that use them really enjoy them.

      You can protest the DRM scheme within the iTunes music store, but you can use iTunes and the iPod with non-DRM music, so I think of it as Apple giving us a choice but still leaving us with freedom to choose. You are probably aware that in earlier versions of PlaysForSure, Microsoft encoded everything into their DRM format before copying it to the player. Not Apple.

      That doesn't seem like behaviour that deserves the "Spanish Inquisition" comment, so I'm curious to hear where that comes from.

      I obviously agree with you entirely about Microsoft and PlaysForSure.

      D

    27. Re:Welcome to the social? by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      If your story was all there was to the iPod, tens of millions of them wouldn't have been sold. There are not that many rabid Apple fans in the world.

      Creating a music player isn't the hard part. Creating a music player the public wants is. Before the iPod, few people even knew what a portable MP3 player was. Apple came up with the right combination of ideas to produce a major success. This took enormous discipline and attention to detail, that was way beyond anything previous MP3 player makers had done.

      Your message doesn't make it clear that you even disagree with anything I said about the Zune. What are you actually trying to say?

      Attacking me for being an Apple fan isn't going to make the Zune good.

      D

    28. Re:Welcome to the social? by pimpimpim · · Score: 1
      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    29. Re:Welcome to the social? by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      Is that the guy who, when asked by Robert Scoble what the Zune's screen resolution was (in an interview just before launch), replied "Er...I don't know."?

      If so, my sympathy is at a low ebb.

    30. Re:Welcome to the social? by the+narf · · Score: 1
      All I use is MP3 format (192kbps) on the Sandisk, but I know that WMA works and from experience I know that M4a doesn't (iTunes ripping for the nano)

      iTunes can happily rip in MP3 format as well, with bit rates up to 320kbps +VBR (Variable Bit Rate). To do so, go to Preferences->Advanced->Importing, and select Import using MP3 Encoder. You can then go to the Setting popup, and select Custom..., and adust parameters like the bit rate (I use 256 Kbps), Enable or Disable VBR (and then set the VBR Quality level, etc.

      I've been using iTunes for several years to burn MP3 CDs for my car stereo, and only recently bought an iPod. Everything's deliberately in MP3 so that I'm not using a proprietary format (AAC). Yes, I know that AAC -- now M4A -- is supposedly a standard, but I don't want to take a chance. MP3s play everywhere, while AAC doesn't.
    31. Re:Welcome to the social? by noamsml · · Score: 1
      I've just bought a Sandisk Sansa c240 1GB. It was very cheap (I got a $10 discount, but even without it the player would cost $80), it has an FM tuner, can record voice, is exactly the right size, and looks damn good. The only three downsides are that it uses MTP, has no ogg support, and doesn't show Hebrew charachters in id3 tags. Consumer Joe, of course, doesn't care about those flaws. I think the question here is why Sandisk isn't outselling the iPod.

      (Not an astroturf, I just think iPods are overrated)

    32. Re:Welcome to the social? by rajafarian · · Score: 1

      I think the question here is why Sandisk isn't outselling the iPod.

      Because they haven't spent $300,000,000 telling people to buy it?

    33. Re:Welcome to the social? by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      Apple has a long history of locked formats and aggressive litigious behavior. Their legal team is more aggressive against consumers that MS' is- I think that history is well-established. That is the basis of their "Spanish Inquisition" line, as is the behavior of their fan base- I am frankly mortified by loyalty to any brand qua brand. (If you want to extend that wing of the metaphor, the fans are the Jesuits and Apple is either the Spanish court or Renaissance/Counter-Reformation Rome.)

      Of course Apple doesn't "deserve" being called the Spanish Inquisition any more than Microsoft deserves being called Stalinist Russia. It's hyperbole on both sides.

      iTunes on Windows is a monstrosity. Attempting to move an iPod between systems is a pain. iTunes is lock-in on two levels: it only works with iPod, and it is the only way to get an iPod to work. Most PFS hardware can also work via drag-and-drop.

    34. Re:Welcome to the social? by slippr · · Score: 1
      and it is the only way to get an iPod to work.
      Really? The users of banshee might beg to differ. And also off the top of my head see Amarok, ephpod, and I think even winamp supports the iPod these days.
    35. Re:Welcome to the social? by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      I tried all those alternatives that worked on Windows (Anapod, etc.) They all sort of work, but were unstable, would lose music, etc, and only if you are cautious about which firmware you are putting in your iPod. But it was an incredible hassle, all in all. Apple is actively discouraging non-iTunes alternatives in a way that MS is not with PFS.

  2. First pun! by neuro.slug · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let's hope this product is zune to be forgotten!

    /me ducks barrage of tomatoes

    1. Re:First pun! by maeka · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't believe this first generation Zune, adapted as it was from an existing player, is meant to be anything more than a placeholder, a foot in the door. The really interesting battle, IMHO, will be the second generation Zune against whatever iPod exists when it comes out.
      Low sales, if anything, give Microsoft a chance to work out Zune Marketplace bugs, while treating the paying public like beta testers, which is their style. Higher sales would just mean the possibility of more angry customers during this trial run.

    2. Re:First pun! by h4rm0ny · · Score: 3, Insightful


      That may be, and I don't know much about MP3 players, but I do know that first impressions count. If this is their strategy, then bad move Microsoft.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    3. Re:First pun! by Trillan · · Score: 1

      And now low sales are a strategic advantage?

      Believe me, if there are problems, we'll hear about them regardless of how many people buy in.

    4. Re:First pun! by dangitman · · Score: 4, Funny

      The second-generation zune will come in a new color, Golden Shower, which is sure to be much more popular with fans of watersports. New catchphrase: Do I Hear Rain?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    5. Re:First pun! by tb3 · · Score: 1

      That's not a bad idea when it comes to software, and you can upgrade existing versions. With hardware, and especially consumer hardware, it doesn't sound so clever. You can't just 'over-write' your Zune with a Zune 2.0. You're just stuck with an expensive paperweight.

      And low sales aren't good for Microsoft, either. The whole wifi sharing thing relies on a critical mass of devices out there, otherwise it's useless. Without the wifi sharing the Zune is just a limited, re-badged, Samsung MP3 player.

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    6. Re:First pun! by davidmcg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To say that poor sales are not disappointing is just trying to spin a bad situation. You should get a job working for Tony Blair :) Simply put, a poor launch can do bad things for the Zune name. Look how Netscape's reputation was permanently damaged after the release of Netscape 6.0. The people who were holding out from IE finally made the switch and never looked back until Firefox. Microsoft needs to fix its mistakes quickly and get this thing selling and getting positive reviews that don't sound like they're paid for by MS. A lot of the positive reviews look like paid postings and seem to follow a similar format: - assuming anyone who does not like the zune is a mac zealot - how brown looks really good when you see it for yourself - how cool it is to send music to your friends - how the video screen makes things look better (that I do agree with - although a higher resolution would be better) - It *will* be even better with firmware updates (I'd rather compare it to what's there now rather than what may or may not happen in the future)

    7. Re:First pun! by linuxci · · Score: 1

      Well people are arguing better functionality will come via firmware updates, however, people saying that are generally just Microsoft shills trying to defend the undefendable.

      No one knows what (if any) firmware updates will happen, so it's best to judge hardware by what it can d now, rather than it's potential

    8. Re:First pun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By tomatoes, you of course mean chairs!

    9. Re:First pun! by jcr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let's hope this product is zune to be forgotten!

      "Origami". ;-)

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    10. Re:First pun! by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      I've actually eaten dinner at a place on Golden Rain road (Rossmoor Retirement Community in/near Walnut Creek, CA)- no joke (http://www.rossmoor.com/our_location/frameourloca tion.html - though not at that specific address)

    11. Re:First pun! by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

      The second-generation zune will come in a new color, Golden Shower, which is sure to be much more popular with fans of watersports. New catchphrase: Do I Hear Rain?

      Paging Steve "I want to squirt you a picture..." Ballmer. Mr Ballmer, please pick up the brown disgusting mental images telephone.

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    12. Re:First pun! by hazee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "...I don't know much about MP3 players, but I do know that first impressions count."

      You're kidding, right?

      "No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame."

      Ring any bells?

    13. Re:First pun! by killjoe · · Score: 1

      This is why MS should have been broken up all those years ago. The only way any company can spend hundreds of millions of dollars making, marketing, designing a product to purposfully fail in the marketplace is if they have a monopoly.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    14. Re:First pun! by MacJedi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      True, but that was Taco's first impression. I'd be willing to give h4rm0ny more credit. ;)

      --
      2^5
    15. Re:First pun! by maeka · · Score: 1

      I never meant to imply the first generation Zune was intended to flop. The point I was trying to put across was that I believe the success or failure of this year's Zune is not relevant to the coming battle. Microsoft may very well lose that one also, but I don't believe anything (including miserable sales) will stop them from releasing a second generation.

    16. Re:First pun! by Atlantis-Rising · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That has jack-all to do with the fact that they're a monopoly (in office and OS software, not MP3 players, by the way) and everything to do with the fact that they have a lot of money.

      Their being a monopoly elsewhere has very little direct impact on this product, just like it has very little direct impact on the Xbox 360 or on MS' hardware business. (Are they still doing that?) All their monopoly (and busines in general) does is FUND these ventures. Any other large company could do the same thing- Sony, for example.

      --
      "It is possible to commit no errors and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life." -Peak Performance
    17. Re:First pun! by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Ballmer: "Hey, at least this model isn't a turd!"

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    18. Re:First pun! by h4rm0ny · · Score: 5, Insightful


      Why thank you. ;)

      To answer the post though, I was talking about the market's first impressions as opposed to mine or Taco's. Quite frankly if the market shared my first impressions, they would achieve the first ever recorded negative sales figures in history. However, the iPod actually did quite well to begin with. There was an initial lag period when it first came out during which it sold moderately well, but then after about eight months it began to rise hugely. Now this could sound reassuring to the Zune lovers (are there any outside Redmond?), but with the iPod, Apple were breaking fairly new ground. MP3 players weren't as prevalent as they are today and nothing quite like the then new iPod was. So that lag time is the technology gathering acceptance, filtering into public awareness, etc. That work is done now and . The Zune is treading old ground and ought to start off with an advantage because of that. But from this story it isn't exactly taking a big chunk of those who are buying their first MP3 player. Furthermore it's trying to break into a very established market whereas the iPod had territory which, if it was fooling around with boys, still had its virginity intact for a little longer. But Jobs has popped that particular cherry and is now in a pretty steady relationship. If the Zune were to steal the girl as it were, it would need to have done better than this.

      It has the backing of Microsoft. It probably wont die. But it's not going to be anything amazing and the one good feature it has is crippled with DRM. Others will replicate it soon enough and hopefully in a better way. As phones, PDAs, MP3 players et al., become more and more integrated, there's not going to be a future for an MP3 player that boasts "Hey, I can do wireless."

      IMHO, of course. ;)

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    19. Re:First pun! by bitt3n · · Score: 5, Funny
      Opening Zune Sales Flaccid

      there goes their chance to penetrate the market.

    20. Re:First pun! by eclectic4 · · Score: 1

      "is meant to be anything more than a placeholder, a foot in the door."

      No, no no no. Was Apple's first iPod a foot in the door? No, it was done right, and right from the beginning. "Marketplace (sp?) bugs" are supposed to be worked out by doing market research. If you fail in this, your product will fail. Using the public as "beta testers" is the first and final nail in their coffin if you are right (which I do not think you are). I think they merely did what they actually did, and was release a product they thought would be killer, and it's not. End of story.

      I mean my goodness, when thousands of people say "the Zune sucks" and it gets around, you actually think MS is going to say "Awesome! The research is going along nicely... then step 3: PROFIT!

      NO no no.

      --

      "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
    21. Re:First pun! by Yakman · · Score: 1

      Isn't that pretty much the same strategy they used with the Xbox? I mean, the original Xbox was based on mostly off the shelf parts like a Celeron CPU and a Geforce graphics chipset. This is what made it so easy to run Linux on, etc.

      They launched this and got a market going while they were working on the Xbox 360 which is the "real" console, with the fancy hardware.

    22. Re:First pun! by Matilda+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      Granted, but Sony can't slip advertisements for it's MP3 player into MSN Messanger, or the first (and sometimes only) homepage users see at a freshly installed Windows installation.

      --
      Tluin natha Linux xxizzuss uriu olt bwael mon'tun.
    23. Re:First pun! by EuroChild · · Score: 1

      This person begs to differ!

      --
      Does this make my brain look big?
    24. Re:First pun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That may be, and I don't know much about MP3 players, but I do know that first impressions count

      Flaccid, uhm?

    25. Re:First pun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the first ever recorded negative sales figures

      I'm helping you out on that front... today I returned two bricks dressed up as zunes and got my money back. Which is good because I never bought one in the first place.

    26. Re:First pun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Others will replicate it soon enough and hopefully in a better way.


      And face the threat of lawsuits from Microsoft for using their patented intellectual property.
    27. Re:First pun! by Karlt1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The huge difference between the XBox introduction and the the Zune introduction was that the XBox was at least considered as good as the Playstation and never got the negative reviews that the Zune has been getting. But don't forget that the playstation 2 is still outselling the XBox and the XBox 360 according to Joystiq.com.

    28. Re:First pun! by Atlantis-Rising · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and that works for IE. (I don't know if Microsoft does slip ads into MSN... humm... do they?)

      Actually, I mean, Sony COULD do the same thing if they really wanted- use their PS3 online service to spam ads for other products. But I don't know how effective that really is.

      Mostly, they just have a lot of money, and that means they have a lot of money to spend on half-assed ventures like the Zune.

      --
      "It is possible to commit no errors and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life." -Peak Performance
    29. Re:First pun! by arth1 · · Score: 1
      To say that poor sales are not disappointing is just trying to spin a bad situation. You should get a job working for Tony Blair :) Simply put, a poor launch can do bad things for the Zune name. Look how Netscape's reputation was permanently damaged after the release of Netscape 6.0.

      Netscape's name was damaged a long time before that. AOL buying it in '99 and the launch of Netscape 4.6 (which was designed to advertise for AOL and Real Networks) did that. And Mozilla hasn't really done much to improve my perceptions, and in my opinion, it went one step worse with Firefox -- I can't see it as being innovative or user-friendly as much as being bad-programmer-friendly. Sure, it has evolved, and is probably the "best" browser out there, but the growth, dynamics and enthusiasm from old Netscape never returned, and apart from incremental changes and bugs being fixed, I really don't think the last 7 years have given us even a fraction of what the first 4 years did.

      On the server side, it's even worse, where the server changes name more often than some people change their underwear, presumably because no matter what they call it, it leaves a bad taste. Is it MCOM, Netscape, iPlanet, SunONE, Sun Java System or what's this week's name? And what used to be the reigning server now has, what, less than half a percent market share? The days of Jamie Z hacking up a new product over the weekend, and bugfixing it the next three weeks without sleep are gone. For better and for worse. There may be fewer nasty surprises, but there sure aren't many good ones either.

      Regards,
      --
      *Art
    30. Re:First pun! by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1
      Opening Zune Sales Flaccid
      there goes their chance to penetrate the market.
      Well, what did you expect from Micro Soft?
    31. Re:First pun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there anything Microsoft can do to pump up sales?

    32. Re:First pun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is pretty specious reasoning. failure is failure.

    33. Re:First pun! by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      Maybe it is just a foot in the door, but I'd say that's a poor tactical move.

      Customers aren't wowed by it, it's nice and does a competant job, but doesn't build a level of excitement.

      The second generation Zune won't get a solid chance if people's memories of the first-gen were bland.

    34. Re:First pun! by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      If you compare the press' first reaction between the two, I think the difference would be pretty apparent. Except with some of the techie community, iPod did generally compare favorably against its competitors. I don't know why Taco thought that wireless was a realistic expectation, nor why Taco thought that the Nomad brick was desirable. The original iPod was a little large, but still a lot smaller than Nomad.

    35. Re:First pun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, how little you know...

      ---
      CAPTCHA phrase of the comment: sincere

    36. Re:First pun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those weren't off-the-shelf parts, though. The Xbox CPU by Intel lies between a Pentium III and a Celeron (regarding cache and interface). The NV2A GPU was something of a cross between NV20/GF3 and NV25/GF4 (NV2A had NV25's two vertex shader engines but also NV20's simpler non-crossbar memory controller). The audio processor core and the system glue logic launched Nvidia's entry into the PC chipset market, they were brand new designs as well.

      But you are right that the hardware was close kin to PC gear, and the consequently easy development was a significant factor in the amount of games and the pretty good success of the Xbox.

    37. Re:First pun! by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      The Zune is all part of the billy goat's master plan to prove his business acumen. He said that the original version wouldn't generate any profit and that they would keep on selling it regardless of how much money it lost, just like the Xbox after six years of losing money and still full steam ahead.

      One has to start to wonder what is the point of these projects, and throwing away billions of dollars of share holder money on one failed scheme after another. It is starting to seem like a lot of these ideas are coming from the bottom of a bottle and the illusory successes that the microsofties belive they are achieving are just a bunch of drunken delusions.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    38. Re:First pun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Zune is treading old ground and ought to start off with an advantage because of that.

      Nonsense. That 'old ground' has a huge shadow cast over it. The Zune cowers under the T-Rex that the iPod is. There is ZERO advantage for anyone who goes up against this megalith, regardless of whether it's Redmond or anyone else who chooses to tread in this market.

  3. this product... not so much by yagu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think (just my opinion) with all of the up-front hype and the resulting "flaccid" initial sales figures, Microsoft may have offered up a pretty big loser. Why? Because so much about the Zune and (some of) its features depend on the social network aspect to achieve functionality, and that won't happen with this slow of a ramp.

    The flip side, also not good, is that with the slow uptake, the disappointing lack of ability to really use the wireless (because of a dearth of "others") will generate a viral, grassroots word of mouth ripple discourageing potential "others" to buy.

    Now slap on the silly DRM, the incompatiblity with almost everything else, the silly purchase plan (float MS a loan anyone?), this product is going nowhere fast. In some ways, too bad, it actually looked to have a certain coolness, but Microsoft forgot and left too heavy a signature...

    Maybe the good news out of all of this is the added prompting for makers like Apple to be more aggressive rolling out things like wireless, etc., though it looks to me like Apple has titrated their rollout almost perfectly.

    1. Re:this product... not so much by Xzzy · · Score: 1

      Because so much about the Zune and (some of) its features depend on the social network aspect to achieve functionality, and that won't happen with this slow of a ramp.

      I would wager it has less to do with units sold (though it can't help) and more to do with the fact that people don't listen to music to be social. They do it so they can ignore people.

      Apple tries this tactic too in some of their ads, and I don't see how they expect it to work. If you want people to socialize, they need to DO something together.

    2. Re:this product... not so much by davidmcg · · Score: 1

      The problem with the Zune was it was rushed. The product feels unfinished, particularly on the software front. This has tarred the Zune with a bad impression. In this market first impressions count. It's important Apple doesn't make the same mistakes and rush the product out

    3. Re:this product... not so much by joel8x · · Score: 1

      I played around with one at a Target the other day and my impressions of the device itself were that it is fantastic. Unfortunately from reading reviews it falls flat on its face when it comes to the software integration. Doing the job half-assed is as good as not donig the job at all.

      --
      Sound waves should be free!
    4. Re:this product... not so much by znu · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Listening to music can be social.

      Jobs on Zune's sharing feature:
      I've seen the demonstrations on the Internet about how you can find another person using a Zune and give them a song they can play three times. It takes forever. By the time you've gone through all that, the girl's got up and left! You're much better off to take one of your earbuds out and put it in her ear. Then you're connected with about two feet of headphone cable.
      Jobs gets this stuff. Think this through. Compare the Bill Gates solution (have people navigate through menus and beam music to other people's players across the room) with what Jobs is proposing. With what Jobs proposes:
      1. You've creating physical intimacy through close physical proximity.
      2. You're listening to the same song at the same time. It's a shared experience. That isn't necessarily so with the Zune approach.
      3. You both have an ear free, so you can actually talk.
      Now, there are comments in response to this Jobs quote all over the Internet to the effect of "I don't see the point, you can do the same thing with the Zune." I suspect astroturfing, because the point is obvious: this Zune feature, the only thing is has going for it, is a complicated technological solution to a problem that people have solved in better ways without the technology.
      --
      This space unintentionally left unblank.
    5. Re:this product... not so much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You (and Jobs) have hit the nail on the head but then Jobs is someone who had actually had relationships with members of the opposite sex, he didn't have to jump some company goldigging bimbo and briber her with $billion to have sex.

      It must really eat Gates up, no matter how much $$$ he has he is still a loser.

    6. Re:this product... not so much by avajcovec · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I agree. The other thing I don't understand is that all of the commercials show the Zune with a "Connecting..." screen. I've seen it about 5 times now and all it makes me think is that this thing takes forever to connect! Not how I want to spend my time. You would think they'd at least have one shot of "Transferring Song..." or somesuch.

    7. Re:this product... not so much by RahoulB · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There was another Jobs quote a few years ago about other players copying the white earbuds ... he said something along the lines of "when the girl sees that it's not an iPod she will think you're a fake".

      I love the way he understands that making a gadget that sells is nothing to do with tech but instead all about pulling the ladies.

    8. Re:this product... not so much by sunwukong · · Score: 1

      It must really eat Gates up, no matter how much $$$ he has he is still a loser.

      And with that single statement you've depressed untold multitudes of (much less wealthy) geeks! ;-)

    9. Re:this product... not so much by jpardey · · Score: 1

      The one problem I can see with that is the transmission of ear infections. Still, just wipe them off well then. It is sort of hard to share music by wireless when the other party doesn't have an mp3 player anyway...

      --
      I have freaks! I did something right...
    10. Re:this product... not so much by dangitman · · Score: 2, Funny
      The one problem I can see with that is the transmission of ear infections.

      Like Phil Collins, for example?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    11. Re:this product... not so much by symbolic · · Score: 1

      That's an awesome observation about the perils of misplaced marketing.

    12. Re:this product... not so much by CaptKilljoy · · Score: 1

      >You're much better off to take one of your earbuds out and put it in her ear.

      With all due respect to Mr. Jobs, my mother taught me not to accept earwax from strangers.

    13. Re:this product... not so much by Garabito · · Score: 1

      This is IMO another instance of presenting the lack of a certain functionality in the product as a feature, like Apple did when the iPod Shuffle was released.

    14. Re:this product... not so much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's just about impressing all the other hipster, trend-whore phonies out there.

    15. Re:this product... not so much by grungefade · · Score: 1

      I'd love to know how many people go up to someone they dont know and offer to put their earbud in their ear. Not to mention the many people with headphones not earbuds. And certainly this crowd isnt going to be talking to a person of the opposite sex anytime soon.

      Sometimes people idolize someone so much they always seem to see their words as gold. To me what Jobs said was kinda embarrasing. "Oh its the enemy.. must think of something negative about a feature mine dosent have." And im not saying this because im a Bill Gates guy either. Personally, I think they are both goofy looking fuckers.

      I predict a future with wireless ipods, and wireless is just another expected feature.

    16. Re:this product... not so much by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      Bad news, dude. 90% of the population are trend-whore phones.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    17. Re:this product... not so much by vought · · Score: 1

      Jobs is someone who had actually had relationships with members of the opposite sex, he didn't have to jump some company goldigging bimbo and briber her with $billion to have sex.

      Sounds like you might have worked at Apple in the early 1980s.

      Lots of conference table fucking. Lots.

    18. Re:this product... not so much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Jobs method works well with someone you know. How do I know, when I go to the football games. I bring a buddy jack along in case the batteries die in my friend's radio. It's awkward. Requires some shifting. Busting out an earbud puts people, who might not know each other that well in each other's personal space. The way people who are uncomfortable with that prospect would resolve that with an iPod or similar is for the person who hasn't heard the song to listen to it, by theirself, while the owner watches, perhaps intently for 3 minutes or so.

      Is the zune method superior? Probably not. The 3 time listen restriction is stupid. VERY stupid considering the industry gets a cut of the sales. Zune is probably closer to my ideal that an iPod. Apple just isn't interested at all in things I want from my player.

      FM tuning, and record from FM, are deal breakers. HD radio would be nice. Sirus service would be even better. With robust wifi connectivity, and a wide array of supported formats such as ogg, etc, well I wouldn't be able to say no to that.

    19. Re:this product... not so much by thepriceisright · · Score: 1

      If Gates is a loser please sign me up! I'd love to be as big of a loser as that man. Keep in mind he is doing some mighty fine work with all the money he has earned (rightfully or wrongly). -Theprice

    20. Re:this product... not so much by Elbowgeek · · Score: 2, Funny

      This calls to mind an interview with Gates on Letterman, in the mid-late 90s after Gates finally acknowledged that just maybe the Internet was going to be the future. He was extolling the wonderful things the 'Net could do for us: provide news, sports coverage, weather and music streaming. Letterman shot back that he could do that now: "It's called a radio." It brought peels of laughter from the audience and threw Gates completely off his game. Brilliant.

      --
      Who is this delectable creature with an insatiable love of the dead?
    21. Re:this product... not so much by jpardey · · Score: 1

      That's one (of many) disease I haven't caught.

      --
      I have freaks! I did something right...
    22. Re:this product... not so much by kabz · · Score: 1

      never underestimate the power of gadgets:

      original star tac.
      peugeot 205Gti
      12" Al PB G4
      neon SRT-4

      errr, forget that last one ;-) no one *really* believes a neon can do 148 mph

      --
      -- "It's not stalking if you're married!" My Wife.
    23. Re:this product... not so much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit fuck yeah to both the Peugeot 205 GTI and the 12" PowerBook.

    24. Re:this product... not so much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah, just wait until they install Linux on there. This little baby has a 30gb harddrive, decent sized screen and built in Wifi. Sans-DRM this could potentially kick ass.

    25. Re:this product... not so much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jobs gets this stuff.

      Yes, if the "stuff" you're talking about is marketing. He responded in the only way he could, given that Microsoft is touting a feature he doesn't have -- he points out some supposed superiority of a feature he _does_ have, even if no one notices that zune has the same feature.

      Why is this so difficult to observe? Dude, you are a victim of reality distortion...

    26. Re:this product... not so much by martinX · · Score: 1

      Does Zune have the same feature? Check the EULA for it. Par 26.1.3 states: You may NOT share an earbud with someone. That's stealing. You may only share music on a limited basis with another Zune droid.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    27. Re:this product... not so much by Maskull · · Score: 1

      What's ironic is that Job's method could be improved on using wireless, by simply allowing people to stream their current song to other nearby Zunes. It would be basically be like plugging a set of speakers and turning up the volume, only more polite. Seriously, there are so many cool things that could have been done with a music player with wireless; as far as I can tell, the Zune does none of them. You can't buy music online from the device. You can share files, sort of. You can't "broadcast" anything. One wonders why it even has wireless...

    28. Re:this product... not so much by stuntpope · · Score: 1

      I'd like to know how many people go up to someone they don't know and offer them a song. I'd expect that if you're offering an earphone to someone, you at least are acquainted with the person. Same thing for "squirting". I'd expect the squirter and squirtee are on speaking terms first. And I don't get all the "yuck!" comments about earwax - do most people have ears overflowing with wax, to the point that when they remove an earbud, it's encased in wax? Not my experience. And fear of ear infections? Most ear infections are on the other side of the eardrum, not where the wax is.

    29. Re:this product... not so much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they didn't have another Zune around to connect to?

  4. That's what happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    when you think you can enter into a saturated market just because you have huge mounds of cash. What's next, a chain of Microsoft restaurants? I have an idea, why doesn't Microsoft start selling shoes?

    Microsoft has gotten so large that it has no direction. They'll just piss money into the wind trying to crowbar into other markets as the fancy strikes them.

    1. Re:That's what happens by Andrew+Kismet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      -shakes head sadly- They said that when the original XBox was launched. Maybe you're right, mp3 players are a far more saturated market than consoles, and the death of the Dreamcast provided a wonderful stepping-stone with an epitaph engraved on it for them to launch from, but remember: Microsoft HAS and WILL CONTINUE to "crowbar into other markets as the fancy strikes them."
      They're just THAT huge.

    2. Re:That's what happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The xbox and the xbox 360 have both lost money for Microsoft, making them less than examples of shining success. The purpose of Microsoft should not be to enter every market other than office suites and operating systems and lose money, which is more or less what they do. Microsoft may plan on eventually chipping away enough market share to become profitable at these tasks, but if it wasn't for the continued revenues of the Office and Windows teams Microsoft would just be spending their warchest with nothing to show for it. In the long-term unless any of these efforts make them money it's basically just them failing a lot, being propped up by their tax on the personal computer market.

    3. Re:That's what happens by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Microsoft HAS and WILL CONTINUE to "crowbar into other markets as the fancy strikes them."

      This is true. However, I think this will eventually lead to Microsoft being several unique companies using the same name.

      I don't think Zune will fail enough to warrant it from being pulled from the shelves and the developers exiled to Ebonia, but its not going to dominate the market.

      Consider the demand for the Wii and PS3 over the Xbox360.

      The Xbox360 isn't a failure, but isn't a mind blowing success when compared to its competitors (well as far as the hype has lead us anyways).

      I suspect the only reason that IE and MS Office succeeded is that they were mostly bundled by OEMs with the computer and those formats caught on and were literally given away for free. (Well not really because the consumers still absorbed the cost somewhere and it would really depend if your OEM installed MS Office or not, but most companies offered packaged deals so it would come with the computer)

      With MP3 players and consoles, you aren't really locked into more than just replacing your music and getting new games.

      And besides... If you get a new generation console it is expected that you still keep your old one so backwards compatibility is a moot point.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    4. Re:That's what happens by jcr · · Score: 1

      They said that when the original XBox was launched.
      Yeah, and what they're saying now is that Microsoft is still spending a fortune to sell those machines below cost. Will it ever go profitable? Maybe, maybe not. In the meantime, what could they have done with the same amount of money in the financial markets?

      At some point, when MS's stock has been stagnant for a couple more years, the shareholders are going to want some answers.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    5. Re:That's what happens by Stalinbulldog · · Score: 1

      But they have the money to do that, and occasionally they find winners

    6. Re:That's what happens by the_humeister · · Score: 2

      There is analysis supporting that MS is now making a profit on each XBox 360 sold. It certainly would make sense given how quickly component prices fall.

  5. Coming in at #83 by Celt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Its Zune, on Amazon's top 100 products
    Fantastic work their Microsoft, beaten by even iPod cases and cheap ass dvd players :)

    --
    "WebTV: bringing the Internet into the shallow end of the gene pool since 1995" - Martin Bishop
    1. Re:Coming in at #83 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whose Microsoft?

    2. Re:Coming in at #83 by EraserMouseMan · · Score: 1

      I bet that if the zune never sold a single unit it wouldn't put a dent in MS's $60 billion. So keep cheering on failure of the zune. And remember that competition from the zune is part of the reason the ipod prices have dropped.

    3. Re:Coming in at #83 by dangitman · · Score: 1
      And remember that competition from the zune is part of the reason the ipod prices have dropped.

      Got any evidence for that? Apple's prices have been consistently dropping every generation. I didn't see an Apple price drop on the day the Zune was launched.

      It doesn't even seem possible - the last Apple price drop was well before the Zune was released - and how can an unreleased product be providing "competition"?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    4. Re:Coming in at #83 by MojoStan · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Doesn't anyone bother to fact-check before modding a troll "Insightful?" The brown Zune, which trolls are ridiculing without seeing it in person, was at #83 (now #78 (1:15pm PST)). The black Zune is at #24.

      Yes, Zune sales appear "flaccid," but you don't need to resort to Michael Moore tactics to make your point.

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

    5. Re:Coming in at #83 by Yonzie · · Score: 1

      Dude, the black Zune (@ #37) is beaten by the 1st generation 4GB iPod Nano (@ #35) which is $10 more than the new one (@ #30)...
      It must *really* sell...

    6. Re:Coming in at #83 by Dak+RIT · · Score: 1
      Well, checking now, at 11pm EST, the BLACK Zune is coming in at 86, between the Sandisk Sansa Silicone Case for m200 Players (Pink) and the GPX iLive ISPK2806 iPod Speakers with Remote Control & Dock for iPod, Mini, Shuffle, and Nano.

      For comparisson:
      10 SanDisk Sansa M240 1 GB MP3 Player (Silver)
      23 Creative Zen Vision:M 30 GB MP3 and Video Player (Black)
      33 Kensington Digital FM Transmitter and Auto Charger for iPod (Black)
      44 Belkin F8Z060 iPod Nano Silicon Sleeve (Black)
      52 Palm Z22 Handheld
      56 Garmin Forerunner 205 Wrist-Mounted GPS Personal Training Device
      61 Apple iPod USB Power Adapter
      74 Logitech Harmony 550 Universal Remote
      83 Coby TF-DVD7107 7" TFT Portable DVD Player
      86 Zune 30 GB Digital Media Player (Black)

      the brown Zune isn't even registering in the top 100. 4 of the top 5 are iPods, including all the top 3, and numerous others all over the top 10 and top 25, not to mention iPod accessories.

      So yes, the Zune the day after appears to be slightly less popular than a wrist-mounted personal training device, and is pretty convincingly outsold by an FM Transmitter for the iPod (which was one of Zune's touted advantages over the iPod).

  6. Soooo.... by Anubis350 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just goes to show, Apple knows hard and black is the way to go!

    --
    "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    1. Re:Soooo.... by the_humeister · · Score: 1

      As they say, once you go black, you can't go back.

    2. Re:Soooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because the white guys won't touch ya....

  7. Well, I'm sure surprised. by jcr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Frankly, I'm amazed that the thing got into the Amazon top ten list at all. I wonder how many units you have to sell in a day to get on that list, and just how many of those units were Evil Empire minions buying one for the team?
    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Well, I'm sure surprised. by KokorHekkus · · Score: 1
      Frankly, I'm amazed that the thing got into the Amazon top ten list at all. I wonder how many units you have to sell in a day to get on that list, and just how many of those units were Evil Empire minions buying one for the team?
      Same problem with this sales list as any other one (such as sold music albums)... it doesn't really say much about popularity unless you have the actual hard numbers and how those numbers compare to the rest of the year (and perhaps same period previous year). Let's see where it lands when christmas shopping really kicks off in a couple of weeks. I don't think it will rank very high.
    2. Re:Well, I'm sure surprised. by jcr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Go do something more meaningful than shilling for a multi-million dollar company.

      What do you think you're doing, sunshine? Does astroturfing for Microsoft pay better than sweeping floors at the mall?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    3. Re:Well, I'm sure surprised. by jcr · · Score: 1

      What heterosexual male calls someone else "sunshine?"
      What's it to you?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    4. Re:Well, I'm sure surprised. by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you've never seen an American film, particularly from the detective or film noir genres. It's a standard line ("listen sunshine, you'd better tell me..."). Maybe you're not familiar with US culture though.

  8. Zune's Problem IS......Balmer by BoRegardless · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Balmer's idea is find something to do a Lock-IN.

    Consumers DO NOT WANT TO BE LOCKED IN.

    All else is BS.

    1. Re:Zune's Problem IS......Balmer by DAldredge · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Then why is the iTunes store so popular?

    2. Re:Zune's Problem IS......Balmer by h4rm0ny · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Define popular. You need a point of comparison, i.e. how well it would be doing if it didn't lock people in. It might have ten times the sales figures without the crappy DRM.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    3. Re:Zune's Problem IS......Balmer by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Because it doesn't lock you in.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    4. Re:Zune's Problem IS......Balmer by timbck2 · · Score: 1

      iTMS is so popular because Apple did it right. It's that simple.

      --
      Absurdity: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion. -- Ambrose Bierce
    5. Re:Zune's Problem IS......Balmer by rhakka · · Score: 1

      tried the newest release?

      I'm an apple fanboy.. fairly extreme one, in fact.. the newest iTunes update has apparently made it so that if I rip a CD and put it on my iTunes, upload to my iPod, I CAN NOT pull those songs off the iPod onto another computer... EVEN IF THAT COMPUTER IS AUTHORIZED for my iTunes account!

      You can pull off iTunes PURCHASES, but not CDs you have ripped on your own on another computer. So if you have a work computer and home computer, you now have to rip the CD individually to both computers to use them in iTunes unless you want to keep the iPod plugged in. Of course, you can't add it to the library on iTunes so you have choose which one to use for your playlists, etc...

      Sweet, huh? They did ok for awhile, but this is a slippery slope and the slip has started, IMHO. I am not bailing on this yet, as I can understand the reasoning and you CAN just leave the iPod plugged in while you are there.. fine.. but it's one step closer to my bail out point for sure.

    6. Re:Zune's Problem IS......Balmer by Technician · · Score: 1

      Then why is the iTunes store so popular?

      Ummm.. Find someone with an I-pod. Ask them how many songs are from I-tunes. Then ask how many songs songs are on it. If less then 1% is popular, you have a wierd sence of popular.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    7. Re:Zune's Problem IS......Balmer by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I tunes has sold over 1 billion songs. I would call that popular.

    8. Re:Zune's Problem IS......Balmer by mspohr · · Score: 1
      I've recently discovered eMusic.com

      It's great for my purposes which is lots of Jazz and Blues classics... I don't think it has Britney Spears, though. It does have 1.4 million tracks that are DRM-free MP3s that are very reasonably priced.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    9. Re:Zune's Problem IS......Balmer by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Britney Spears' first album sold 15 million copies in the US. With 11 tracks on the disc, that's 165,000,000 Tracks sold by a single artist on a single disc. Granted she's a very popular artist but if a single artist can make even 1/10 of the sales of iTunes on a single disc, then I wouldn't say that iTunes comes anywhere close to approaching popularity. It's just a drop in the bucket as far as music sales are concerned.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    10. Re:Zune's Problem IS......Balmer by Rytr23 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Maybe I am wrong but couldn't you simply drag the mp3s on the ipod in disk mode and then copy off the files to the new pc and import into itunes? Not quite as "slick" but perfectly effective.. oh and you can't even use the zune in disk mode?!?!? WTF is that?

      --
      So many injustices..so little time..
    11. Re:Zune's Problem IS......Balmer by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Screw Microsoft.
      Screw Apple.

      I have an 80GB Neuros II, 1000 CD's ripped to OGG and about 150 albums I bought from eMusic.

      iTunes doesn't even carry 90% of the music I would want (but don't already have), and who needs their stupid DRM.

      eMusic is great for people who aren't afraid to go outside the Top 40, their price can't be beat, and their recommendation system is excellent.

      DRM is for losers.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    12. Re:Zune's Problem IS......Balmer by Baricom · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wikipedia says that they sold 67,641,000 iPods and 1.5 billion songs as of fourth quarter 2006. At that rate, they've sold about 22 songs per iPod.

      There have been 28 different models of iPod, excluding different colors. The mean capacity of the iPod given those models is just under 18.5 gigabytes. Apple's marketing materials consider 1 gigabyte to hold 250 songs; therefore, the "average" iPod holds 4,625 songs.

      Sorry, but 22 songs per iPod just doesn't strike me as a runaway success. I'm proof that the DRM is hindering sales - if it wasn't there, I'd be spending about $10 per month on iTunes content instead of $0. I'm sure I'm not the only one.

    13. Re:Zune's Problem IS......Balmer by schnikies79 · · Score: 1

      You were never able to copy songs off the ipod without 3rd party software, so whats the big deal? Now they are letting you copy off some file, files that you have bought from the itunes store.

      You can still use 3rd party apps to pull the files off. You always have been able to and you still can. No need to rip twice.

      --
      Gone!
    14. Re:Zune's Problem IS......Balmer by vingt · · Score: 3, Informative

      the newest iTunes update has apparently made it so that if I rip a CD and put it on my iTunes, upload to my iPod, I CAN NOT pull those songs off the iPod onto another computer... EVEN IF THAT COMPUTER IS AUTHORIZED for my iTunes account!

      For a self-confessed Apple fanboi, you seem to have gone out of your way to deliberately misrepresent Apple on this one. Let's clear this up for you - Apple has added a feature! Prior to this update you couldn't pull any songs off the iPod onto another computer without third party software. Now they've added a way for you to copy the purchased music to a different computer. Ostensibly, this is to facilitate backup as well as allow playback. Let me state it again - something that Apple did not allow/facilitate before has now been added. It's progress not the regression you seem to mistakenly believe...

    15. Re:Zune's Problem IS......Balmer by macslut · · Score: 1

      This is a silly argument. Nobody could argue with you that people don't want DRM, do want cheaper songs, and do want higher quality, etc... BUT... If there was no DRM at the iTMS, their sales would drop. This is because none of the major labels would be on board.

    16. Re:Zune's Problem IS......Balmer by dogfriend · · Score: 1

      Cause you're not really locked in. You can burn to CD or find a program to strip the Fairplay DRM.

      Or just don't buy from iTMS. Your choice.

    17. Re:Zune's Problem IS......Balmer by pyite · · Score: 1

      This is because none of the major labels would be on board.

      This is a horrible argument. If there's nothing to buy, of course no one's going to buy anything.

      The way I feel is that something has to give. It's silly to pay almost the same price for a lossy copy of something as the actual "something" itself. If songs were $0.25 a pop, I'd probably buy a lot. But, when an album is $9.99 and a lot of albums out there can be purchased for $12.99 at a store... why am I going to save $3 and get an inferior product?

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    18. Re:Zune's Problem IS......Balmer by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Considering that most iPod buyers already have music collections from other sources, it's relly not too bad. In terms of popularity against other pay-for-download services, it is a big success. It's really the only successful business of its kind, and many others have tried. Many people are still getting used to the idea of buying music in a non-physical format.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    19. Re:Zune's Problem IS......Balmer by zenslug · · Score: 1

      Regular people don't know or care about DRM.

      I look at my $1.99 iTunes purchases as payments for convenience. I don't buy music there anymore since I started using lala (CDs don't have DRM, or at least those that I get), but I do buy TV shows. I know about DRM, and I don't like it, but for me $1.99 is the cost of convenience, not ownership.

    20. Re:Zune's Problem IS......Balmer by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      And the exact same things apply to the zune.

    21. Re:Zune's Problem IS......Balmer by jrockway · · Score: 1

      > $1.99 is the cost of convenience, not ownership

      Or you could just download the TV shows from Usenet, without DRM, with higher resolution, and for less money.

      --
      My other car is first.
    22. Re:Zune's Problem IS......Balmer by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      Regular people don't know or care about DRM.
      Sure they do. If they could purchase an MP3 directly from a store online and stick it on whatever MP3 player they care to have purchased, then that's a much bigger market and that would be much more sales. I can't say how many more sales it would be, but I think my point that we can't say DRM doesn't hold it back is supportable.

      Aside from that though, I find it a little patronising when people here on /. talk about "regular folk" or "Joe Sixpack". People are often very well informed about their purchases. Because people have applied their minds to other things, it doesn't mean that they're unable to understand things like DRM and lock-in. Not only that, but people who do have a very good grasp of technology are often opinion formers, writing reviews, offering opinions to their friends, etc. These all have knock on effects, so the publicity angle of DRM does affect sales beyond programmers and Linux users.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    23. Re:Zune's Problem IS......Balmer by Technician · · Score: 1

      But, when an album is $9.99 and a lot of albums out there can be purchased for $12.99 at a store... why am I going to save $3 and get an inferior product?

      I can sell my used CD on E-Bay for $5 if I don't like it. Try that with your used I-Tunes songs.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    24. Re:Zune's Problem IS......Balmer by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      "Sure they do. If they could purchase an MP3 directly from a store online and stick it on whatever MP3 player they care to have purchased, then that's a much bigger market and that would be much more sales."

      Apple has 78% of the market. If it could market to the other 22% it would only increase its market by 28%. But Napster only has 500,000 subscribers (and dropping) and Real only has 1.4 Million.

      Apple barely breaks even on iTunes. If it increase volume it would still barely be a drop in the bucket.

    25. Re:Zune's Problem IS......Balmer by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      iTunes ranks 5th in the number of songs sold in the United States -- not just online.

      1. Walmart
      2. Target
      3. Best Buy
      4. Amazon
      5. iTunes

      This is of course normalized to factor in single sells versus entire CDs.

    26. Re:Zune's Problem IS......Balmer by zenslug · · Score: 1

      You might find it patronizing, but I am just telling it like I see it. All of my non-geek friends have no idea what DRM is until I tell them about it. Then they don't like it. But they don't care a whole lot about it. There is stuff that each of my friends cares about that I either have no idea about or am simply not passionate about. I'm not calling them stupid, but they are uninformed and Apple's DRM hasn't kicked many people in the ass yet.

      As for your other points, I agree. I spread the word about DRM when I find the right context, as I'm sure you do too. So my friends now have an understanding about what DRM is and why it is bad.

    27. Re:Zune's Problem IS......Balmer by zenslug · · Score: 1
      Or you could just download the TV shows from Usenet, without DRM, with higher resolution, and for less money.

      Agreed, but that isn't as convenient for me. We can get into an argument about how simple and easy it is, but for me I don't want to spend my time doing that sort of thing. If you do, go for it, you'll be saving money. I can change the oil in my car, but I don't. Instead I pay someone else to do it because I value the convenience.

    28. Re:Zune's Problem IS......Balmer by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1
      As for your other points, I agree. I spread the word about DRM when I find the right context, as I'm sure you do too. So my friends now have an understanding about what DRM is and why it is bad.,/blockquote>

      I do indeed spread the word, and both our points are valid. Sorry if I came across as overly judgemental. It's just I probably was. ;)

      Regards,

      -H.
      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    29. Re:Zune's Problem IS......Balmer by zenslug · · Score: 1

      No worries. I'm thinking that DRM will likely become more visible in the coming years as more and more devices and software try to implement it. I'm interested to see how HDMI fares given its copy protection scheme. Looking forward to the death of that.

    30. Re:Zune's Problem IS......Balmer by pyite · · Score: 1

      I can sell my used CD on E-Bay for $5 if I don't like it. Try that with your used I-Tunes songs.

      This is my point... iTunes is overpriced. As are their movies. Im sure Apple would love to go lower, but the studios just don't seem to understand.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    31. Re:Zune's Problem IS......Balmer by mofolotopo · · Score: 1

      For anyone who likes independent/underground/obscure music, emusic is like a handshake from Jesus.

  9. A product no one wanted by ConfusedSelfHating · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It was almost as if Microsoft said "Let's throw millions of dollars at a market and see if we can get a piece of it." The fact that it was trying to enter a market that is already flooded with similar products doesn't help. The fact that the Zune is incompatible with Microsoft's music files doesn't help.

    This is not to say that Microsoft should stay out of consumer electronics. The Xbox 360 has a good chance of being the dominant console this generation (outside of Japan). The Zune just happens to be a waste of time and money.

    1. Re:A product no one wanted by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful
      This is not to say that Microsoft should stay out of consumer electronics. The Xbox 360 has a good chance of being the dominant console this generation (outside of Japan).

      Not if the reviews of the Wii are any indication...
      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    2. Re:A product no one wanted by Blimey85 · · Score: 1
      I think the Wii has a better chance of upstaging Sony than the 360. A lot of people are interested in the Wii not because of it's cool new features but because it's so much cheaper than the competition. Lots of parents don't want to cough up $400 or $600 for a game console. Sure they could get the cheaper models of each but then they would look cheap. And lets face it, the Wii is pretty damn cool.

      I have a 360 and I hope it does really well now that the PS3 is out but I don't think it will be number one when the dust settles. Sony knows game consoles and they've rocked the market twice now. I don't see that changing anytime soon. I'll be buying a PS3 in a year or so when there are several good games for it, just like I bought a 360 a week ago. I'll pick up a Wii probably before Christmas, just cause it's cool and cheap, and there are quite a few game titles coming out already.

      --
      How is it that one careless match can start a forest fire, but it takes a whole box to start a campfire?
    3. Re:A product no one wanted by Divebus · · Score: 1

      // It was almost as if Microsoft said "Let's throw millions of dollars at a market and see if we can get a piece of it." //

      I keep coming back to the stock holders. SOMEONE from that group is going to "get" that Microsoft sucks as a tech company and demand they take all that money wasted on Zune and XBox and put it into a 5.25% 6 month CD at the bank. They'd make a much larger return for the shareholders.

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    4. Re:A product no one wanted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was almost as if Microsoft said "Let's throw millions of dollars at a market and see if we can get a piece of it."

      From my experince working in corporate America, you hit the nail on the head. Company develops a cool new product, all the other companies follow suit.

      Examples from the car industry:
      Chrysler (one of the more innovative car companies out there IMO) creates mini-vans, turbo diesel trucks and the PT cruiser. Ford and GM then pump up their turbo diesel truck line, mini vans become common and GM gives us the 'Aztec'.

      There is not a lot of creativity in the corporate world. Just a lot of followers.

    5. Re:A product no one wanted by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 1

      Read some of the reviews on Amazon, it's actually quite hilarious! For example, you can't use front USB ports to connect this thing. It doesn't understand "plays4sure" (although that's old news). Can't use Media Player (has its own software). Won't play music from other stores (like Urge and Napster, both of which Media Player pushes at you). Bigger screen, but same resolution as an iPod. Doesn't work on 64bit systems. Currently, doesn't work with Vista. Of course, they will say that Vista is in Beta. I say what better time to work out the bugs? What, wait until Vista is officially released _then_ fix bugs? Brilliant!...for Apple, that is.

      Want more? How about a point system for buying music that almost always means that you don't use up all your points? WiFi sharing from 3 feet only? You can't use the Zune as a portable hard drive?

      People sometimes criticize open source software because things don't always play together well. But a piece of hardware from a company not working with that same company's software/DRM? That's just inexcusable. The only thing that could have caused that is piss-poor communication within Microsoft and a general unwillingness to cooperate. You'd think something as hyped as the Zune would be a priority project that would seamlessly integrate with all other related products by design. So, what's up with Microsoft? Are they unable to get it right or are they unwilling to get it right? What do you think?

      As many others have pointed out before, the only good in the Zune is that its nice features will be adopted by other players (like the iPod).

      --
      blah blah blah
    6. Re:A product no one wanted by ConfusedSelfHating · · Score: 1

      I said a "has a good chance", not "will".

      The advantages of the Wii tend to be double-edged. The innovative controller will attract some people and repel others. Some people want the same type of controller that they had with their Gamecube/Xbox/PS2. Some people (myself included) will need to test it out first. An inexpensive price means lackluster graphics. I understand why some people don't want to pay more money for superior graphics, but a lot of people do. The family friendly nature of Nintendo draws many people to their console, but many gamers want a larger selection of games with brutal violence. The Wii will have some Mature games, but not as many as its rivals.

      The Wii may be the dominant console. It's just not written in stone. The PS3 and Xbox 360 have their own advantages and drawbacks that I won't get into right now. If the adoption of high definition television sets is lower than expected, the Wii will be in a very good position.

    7. Re:A product no one wanted by ucblockhead · · Score: 1
      The Xbox 360 has a good chance of being the dominant console this generation (outside of Japan).


      Not until Sony stops selling the PS2, which is still outselling the Xbox 360.
      --
      The cake is a pie
    8. Re:A product no one wanted by Saige · · Score: 1

      First, the parent said "this generation", which now that the PS3 has launched, does not include the PS2. I mean heck, the PS2 is outselling the PS3 by a huge margin too, so what does that mean for Sony - that their old product is better than their new product? Heck, for a long time the PS1 outsold the PS2. That's the way it works as console generations advance. I'd say that PS2 sales should start dropping significantly now that the PS3 is out, but considering that Sony seems unable to produce more than a dozen a day, and people need to work second jobs to buy them (their words, not mine), it'll probably be a while.

      PS2's are much cheaper, and there are tons and tons of games available. And heck, a significant portion of their sales are probably people buying new ones to replace old ones that have stopped working.

      Let's compare the 360's showing to the Wii and PS3, and not previous generations of consoles.

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
    9. Re:A product no one wanted by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      My point was really that how can one expect the XBox to dominate this generation if it can't even dominate the last one? Honestly, I think that people who want cheap fun will go for the Wii and people who want the heaviest graphics will go for the PS3. The Xbox, being neither the cheapest nor the best, will satisfy neither the cheap bastards nor the "gotta have the power!" crowd, and languish. At least, that's my guess.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    10. Re:A product no one wanted by Saige · · Score: 1

      We'll see if the graphics for the PS3 do end up being anything to justify people picking it over the 360. None of the launch titles are any better than the 360's launch titles, and the multi-platform games are looking equal or better on the 360. And given the 360's much superior development tools (and any game developer out there will agree the 360's tools are far better), there's reason to think that developers will make better use of the 360 faster than on the much-harder to program PS3. And for those people who really love online play and the like, the 360 is far and away the best choice.

      And your point's not valid. Watch - it's going to be quite a while until ANY of the current gen consoles really starts surpassing the PS2 in sales. By your logic, none of them are going to win this generation in that case. PS2 sales this late in the console's lifetime, with the low price and large library just can't be appropriately compared to systems early in their lifetimes

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
  10. Most Microsoft products suck in first release by Animats · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is normal for Microsoft. The first release of a new product never does well. Windows 1 was terrible. Early versions of Excel weren't competitive with Lotus 1-2-3. The original Internet Explorer was lame. It took three years before ".NET" made any sense. Direct-X was terrible in its early versions. The original Xbox worked but was a huge money drain on Microsoft.

    Then Microsoft fixes the problem. Each new release gets better. In time, the competition is crushed.

    1. Re:Most Microsoft products suck in first release by theurge14 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Microsoft Money never crushed Quicken, and after all these years Internet Explorer is playing catchup to an open source browser. Perhaps things aren't exactly the same as they used to be.

    2. Re:Most Microsoft products suck in first release by metalcup · · Score: 1
      from the article

      "Microsoft itself has acknowledged that the Zune investment may take years to bear fruit, and analysts upheld the expectation. "Apple will not feel any bit of discomfort from Zune, certainly this holiday season and a good part of next year, said IDC analyst Danielle Levitas. Microsoft is going to put tons of money in this over time, much like they did with the Xbox' video game console, she said. It's not about the first generation (of devices)."


      I think this might end up being true - though whether, even then, Microsoft will turn out to be the ipod killer is hard to say: I'd bet on apple retaining the top spot with a reduced marketshare (and at 72%, it is a pretty high marketshare) and Zune coming in second - backed by heavy marketing..

      --
      "Laziness is an optimisation protocol"
    3. Re:Most Microsoft products suck in first release by dangitman · · Score: 1
      Do you really think that Microsoft can keep getting away with that strategy? Don't you think consumers might be losing their patience with Microsoft?

      That might have worked with computer software, which has historically been pretty crappy and full of bugs, with few choices. People expect computers to suck. Or, at least they did when Microsoft made their monopoly. We expect our computers to be a lot easier and less buggy today than we did in 1994.

      Will Microsoft's strategy work in a more mature, consumer-based market? Imagine if Microsoft wanted to make cars. Would car buyers tolerate the first couple of generations being shitty and buggy? Or would Microsoft's name in cars become dirt? After all, you can get Toyotas and Hondas and BMWs that work perfectly. Why would car buyers trust a third-generation Microsoft car, after the first ones turned out to be bombs?

      Similar with the iPod. It has never been "shitty," or had more than minor bugs. It was perfection compared to most of the other shit on the market. People put up with Windows, because they were basically stuck with it, or forced to use it in the workplace. Nobody is stuck with a Zune or forced to use one.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    4. Re:Most Microsoft products suck in first release by jcr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Microsoft Money never crushed Quicken
      Actually, the story of how the Empire tried to eat Intuit's lunch is quite an interesting one. They pretended they wanted to buy them out, crawled all over the place ostensibly for their "due diligence" for the buyout, and then went off and wrote an app implementing Intuit's product plan for Quicken 4. When Intuit realized they'd been had, they jumped one product generation, and went ahead with what they'd planned to do in Quicken 5. MS Money hit the streets just a couple of months before Quicken got their next version out.

      Over the next year or two, MS tried the usual trick of bundling their product with the OS to try to kill Intuit, but that just convinced the customers that MS Money was a throwaway. Also, financial records are something that you REALLY don't want to leave up to a microsoft product. I know accountants who still use Lotus 123 because they don't trust Excel.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    5. Re:Most Microsoft products suck in first release by Vexorian · · Score: 1
      and after all these years Internet Explorer is playing catchup to an open source browser
      I am firefox user but I seriously doubt so. The whole fact that just 10% of the market is considered such a success for firefox kind of proves that IE dominance is way too strong.
      --

      Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
    6. Re:Most Microsoft products suck in first release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think it would be hard for Microsoft to buy a Sandisk or a Cowon (cowonamerica.com) or an Iriver? Of course not. MS will get into the game. Apple better not rest on its laurels. The next Ipod better support Wi-Fi and have greater file type support, like FLAC. Otherwise Zune 2.0 will leapfrog it.

    7. Re:Most Microsoft products suck in first release by Derosian · · Score: 1

      We are the Borg, resistance is futile, you will be assimilated.

    8. Re:Most Microsoft products suck in first release by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft Money never crushed Quicken

      Fair point, though it's hard to understand why, since Quicken really sucks in a lot of ways. Just momentum, I suppose.

      and after all these years Internet Explorer is playing catchup to an open source browser

      Explorer is playing catch-up because they stopped developing on it. Note that IE absolutely destroyed the sucky-piece-of-crap known as Netscape. And now that MS is paying attention, IE7 has what Firefox has. What what happens when Vista comes out with IE7, and very few bother to download Firefox again.

      Anyway, even if I grant Firefox, two products (one old, one free) don't make a trend compared to the piles of other examples.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    9. Re:Most Microsoft products suck in first release by theurge14 · · Score: 1

      There's other examples.

      Microsoft PictureIt/Digital Image Pro vs Photoshop
      IIS vs Apache
      MSN Search vs Google/Yahoo

    10. Re:Most Microsoft products suck in first release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then Microsoft fixes the problem.

      Really? At what version was Windows fixed?

    11. Re:Most Microsoft products suck in first release by spirit_fingers · · Score: 1

      Damn right. Bob 6.0 is absolutely fabulous!

    12. Re:Most Microsoft products suck in first release by Slithe · · Score: 1

      Better yet, maybe the next iPod should also be a cellphone! Wait a minute . . .

      --
      ---- "XML is like violence. If it doesn't fix the problem, you aren't using enough."
    13. Re:Most Microsoft products suck in first release by dangitman · · Score: 1
      The next Ipod better support Wi-Fi and have greater file type support, like FLAC. Otherwise Zune 2.0 will leapfrog it.

      Only if the majority of consumers care about FLAC and wireless features. There's no evidence yet that this is the case. Perhaps those things are important to the target market, perhaps not. There's certainly no rush of consumers from the iPod to players with FLAC support. How many people even use FLAC at all, or know what it is?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    14. Re:Most Microsoft products suck in first release by yoasif · · Score: 1

      The FLAC support argument is something that occasionally comes up, but I feel like it's lacking in merit.

      The iPod already supports lossless audio; ALAC. Lossless to lossless conversions are non-lossy, so Apple would gain very little (other than goodwill from the open-source fans); for most people, if they have audio in FLAC, it's trivial to convert to ALAC and listen on an iPod.

    15. Re:Most Microsoft products suck in first release by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      The earliest version of Excel was for the Mac and it was a lot better than Lotus at the time on DOS or the Mac. In fact Excel for Windows 3.x was much better than Lotus. The Windows version of Lotus got horrible reviews.

    16. Re:Most Microsoft products suck in first release by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      They haven't been able to do it when they didn't already have a natural monopoly to build on. (First MSDOS, then Windows.) Windows, Excel, IE, DirectX all built on natural monopolies

      The XBox has been profitable (I think) but it has never done anything like "crush the competition".

      --
      The cake is a pie
    17. Re:Most Microsoft products suck in first release by csirac · · Score: 1

      Also, financial records are something that you REALLY don't want to leave up to a microsoft product.

      You don't want to trust a multi-user Intuit product either. A place I used to work at had to support Quicken/Quickbooks, among other things. I don't recall any other software that reduced the poor book keepers almost to tears days before the tax reporting deadline and find that their .qbw and .qbb files have been silently corrupted for months and months, that no restore from backup will save the day and that there's just no hope of having the thing spit out the final reports.

      We would setup a nightly scheduled task at these places to rebuild/verify data. Honestly, with 2-3 busy users, it needed daily rebuilds.

      The newer versions are better but the Giant File Lock scheme they're using has become slower... oh no, I'm rambling about Quicken, I better stop there :-)

    18. Re:Most Microsoft products suck in first release by straybullets · · Score: 1
      I know accountants who still use Lotus 123 because they don't trust Excel.

      Although i sometimes hate microsoft inner logics, i must say this is completly ridiculous : i've worked in several fortune 500 companies where, at many levels, the acounting jobs were done with excel macros. How can you "not trust" excel ? This must be one of the most silly arguments against excel i've ever read, and god knows there are many that stand !

      --
      With that aggravating beauty, Lulu Walls.
    19. Re:Most Microsoft products suck in first release by kabz · · Score: 1

      On a good screen, Firefox 2.0 looks and behaves much better than IE 7.0 I'm running Vista Beta and IE 7.0 is ok, but kinda clunky feeling. FF 2.0 has lots of really nice touches like redesigned icons, spell checking and the interface in general is very clean and polished. Other items like reduced memory usage are really icing on the cake.

      --
      -- "It's not stalking if you're married!" My Wife.
    20. Re:Most Microsoft products suck in first release by Alexis1537 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like an excuse to me. The first Xbox was fine - it was well executed, the game were pretty good, it gained enough traction to make Xbox360 relevant today. I don't buy this "they're new to this music player lark and therefore we can allow the at least one cock up" business. They've had 5 years to get this right, clever techies and a boatload of cash. Apple's first iPod wasn't perfect, but it was still beautifully executed.

      Looks to me like they've:

      - mis-judged the market;
      - executed the product poorly; and
      - marketed the product naively.

      They might get it right over time, but I'm not taking part in this extended beta testing program when I have a mature platform (iPod) that already gives me what I want.

    21. Re:Most Microsoft products suck in first release by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Then Microsoft fixes the problem. Each new release gets better. In time, the competition is crushed.

      That's not always the case. They had axed WebTV, Ultimate TV, and their networking hardware line-up. When they axed their network hardware line-up, even the driver downloads for them disappeared. Their input devices never did dominate, and still don't have a dominant position in the market, though I do like some of those products. XBox 360 is probably still a huge drain on Microsoft. I'd like to know

      I also don't expect that Apple is unaware the of the Microsoft product history. I don't believe for a minute that they will be ignoring that.

    22. Re:Most Microsoft products suck in first release by jimicus · · Score: 1

      after all these years Internet Explorer is playing catchup to an open source browser.

      Maybe in terms of technology, but Microsoft have always been more concerned with market share - and while that's dropped, I doubt Steve or Bill are having sleepless nights over it.

  11. Who is lining up for the PS3? by maynard · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Check ebay. Prices have already crashed to ~$1200 for a 60GB unit, and below $1000 for the 20GB model. Further there are over 25000 units listed and no where near enough buyers. Folks who listed with a buy it now at $3000 - $3500 are going to be sorely disappointed. I suspect that we'll see equilibrium well below twice retail, and possibly less than 1.5 times within a week.

    So, how long before I can walk into a Toys 'R Us or Target and pick one off the shelf? Perhaps even before Christmas. This is the most amazing example of an economic boom to bust I've ever seen.

    1. Re:Who is lining up for the PS3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, at least they had boom. With Zune it was a bust from the start.

    2. Re:Who is lining up for the PS3? by Technician · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is the most amazing example of an economic boom to bust I've ever seen.

      What you have seen is the effect of too many players in a speculative market. Almost nobody pays $3000 for a game console. The rumor of people buying them for $3000 got lots of people excited about easy money and a high mark-up. It's just like the pump and dump stocks. Nothing new here. A few consoles got bought then and sold for $1500 to another investor sucker who thought he could sell it for $3000. Not many paid $1500 to play the console.

      A word to the wise, keep out of the specultation market. Very few win at the game.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    3. Re:Who is lining up for the PS3? by tuffy · · Score: 1
      So, how long before I can walk into a Toys 'R Us or Target and pick one off the shelf? Perhaps even before Christmas. This is the most amazing example of an economic boom to bust I've ever seen.

      Given Sony's supply problems (the low Cell yield and Blu-Ray laser shortages, in particular) it might be awhile before one can walk into a store and pick up a PS3. But I think the decline of huge eBay markups is an illustration that the demand for the PS3 at the current price is not very broad once the hardcore "must have it on day one" buyers are out of the way.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    4. Re:Who is lining up for the PS3? by maynard · · Score: 1

      What you have seen is the effect of too many players in a speculative market.

      Oh yeah. This is the clearest example of a modern day tulip mania I've seen. Black Monday back in '87 might also compare. What's striking about though is not the divergence between price expectations among sellers and buyers, but the extreme speed of this market correction. I mean, refresh eBay and you'll see equilibrium slide in real time. Pretty damn cool!

    5. Re:Who is lining up for the PS3? by Technician · · Score: 1

      I mean, refresh eBay and you'll see equilibrium slide in real time. Pretty damn cool!
      --

      Now two days later after weeding past all the e-mail addresses for sale, I found a few PS3's with no bids and one with a $25 bid. There are a few dreamers with a buy it now price of 2999.00. I have not found any lately with bids close to retail price. Maybe the end of auction bidding frenzy will bring it up near retail. I would laugh if they sold for less than retail.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  12. Just another crappy MP3 player by flyingfsck · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People have already wizened up to MP3 players. The popular ones don't have proprietary file formats, have a USB mass storage connection and a FM radio. Zune fails on all counts.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    1. Re:Just another crappy MP3 player by deft · · Score: 1

      ipod has a built in FM radio now?

      not without a $49 radio remote.

      --

      There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
    2. Re:Just another crappy MP3 player by FuturePastNow · · Score: 0, Troll

      "The popular ones don't have proprietary file formats, have a USB mass storage connection and a FM radio. Zune fails on all counts."

      Actually, they all play MP3s, which is what I assume you mean by non-proprietary formats (or do you mean ogg? You don't seriously think anyone outside Slashdot cares about ogg, do you?). And as for USB and FM radio, the popular players don't have either of those things.

      (Yes, I know iPods use USB. But they require a dock and aren't mass storage devices out of the box. They also can't be connected to other USB storage devices for file transfers. And stop looking at me like that- I like my iPod)

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    3. Re:Just another crappy MP3 player by Technician · · Score: 1

      People have already wizened up to MP3 players. The popular ones don't have proprietary file formats, have a USB mass storage connection and a FM radio. Zune fails on all counts.
      --


      Funny you should mention that. I was just looking at the Crative one. It also has stereo Line In. It has a built in Microphone. It can be used to make MP3's out of your LP and tape library. You are right. The Zune is useless for my applications.

      The Creative player is a lot less expensive. It's only downside is it has much less storage space. ;-(

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    4. Re:Just another crappy MP3 player by astrosmash · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Of the 14 million people who bought iPods this quarter (150,000 per day), the vast majority of them couldn't care to purchase the FM radio option, don't care about file formats (as long as it plays their existing MP3s), and don't use their iPod as a generic mass storage device.

      Although I rarely use it, I agree that the mass storage feature is nice to have when you need it; I can't image how an MP3 player could ship without it.

      Some techies seem to waste a lot of time fretting over issues such as file formats, DRM, and technical specs. Meanwhile, everyone else is too busy enjoying their music to give a rats ass.

      --
      ENDUT! HOCH HECH!
    5. Re:Just another crappy MP3 player by Coward+the+Anonymous · · Score: 1
      (Yes, I know iPods use USB. But they require a dock and aren't mass storage devices out of the box. They also can't be connected to other USB storage devices for file transfers. And stop looking at me like that- I like my iPod)

      Uh, I have a 30GB black video iPod that I got for Christmas last year. It DOES NOT require a dock and it pops up in Windows AND Mac OS X as a removable drive. You just have to use iTunes to sync music and videos, but you can use it as a USB drive for anything you want.
      --
      -- Jason
    6. Re:Just another crappy MP3 player by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, I know iPods use USB. But they require a dock and aren't mass storage devices out of the box.

      They don't require a dock, but they do require a cable with a dock adaptor at one end (the dock connector has USB pins, among other things). Third party manufacturers also produce adaptors, and the pin-outs of the dock connector are available if you want to create your own.

      They also can't be connected to other USB storage devices for file transfers.

      They show up as mass storage devices on any computer that recognises their filesystem. The OS X ones are formatted as HFS+ and the Windows ones are FAT32, so only the Windows ones will work with Windows.

      They also can't be connected to other USB storage devices for file transfers

      This is a limitation of USB. Unlike FireWire, it is a client-server bus, so one device has to act as the host. Some digital cameras can do this, and you can plug an iPod into these. With FireWire, it was easier since every device was a peer and could talk to any other FireWire device.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:Just another crappy MP3 player by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      "Some techies seem to waste a lot of time fretting over issues such as file formats"

      That's the only thing that frustrates me about the iPod and the Zune as well. I rip to DivX because I have 3 DivX players in my house, and I don't want to re-rip or transcode to yet another format (wmv or mp4) to watch on this device.

      So instead of selling my iPod for an Archos, I'm getting an MP80B.

      --
      I don't get it.
    8. Re:Just another crappy MP3 player by jubei · · Score: 1
      They also can't be connected to other USB storage devices for file transfers

      This is a limitation of USB. Unlike FireWire, it is a client-server bus, so one device has to act as the host. Some digital cameras can do this, and you can plug an iPod into these. With FireWire, it was easier since every device was a peer and could talk to any other FireWire device.


      The firewire iPods didn't have this feature, either. Peer to peer file copy is an obvious killer app for a portable firewire storage device, but Apple didn't want to go there.

      I know Steve Jobs wants to get you close to your honey, but what about when you want to check out some new artist that one of your buddies is listening to? Sharing an earphone isn't quite as appealing.
  13. Palm, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, PDA's running Windows where initially a sales dog. Now where is Palm?

    1. Re:Palm, anyone? by Knuckles · · Score: 2, Funny

      Where are PDAs? Haven't seen one in ages.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    2. Re:Palm, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Where's Palm? Exactly where they were, technically, and still with a large chunk of the market. And Windows, meanwhile, has a much more modern product and is still trailing Palm (in the few studies honest enough to include the Treo, that is)... despite years of Palm neglecting to deliver a modern OS. It really tells you how eager people are to have a Microsoft-based device in their pocket, doesn't it?

    3. Re:Palm, anyone? by no+reason+to+be+here · · Score: 2

      uhh, they're making kick ass smart phones, because no one owns just a PDA anymore.

    4. Re:Palm, anyone? by dangitman · · Score: 1
      That's a bad comparison. Microsoft's core business was already Operating Systems. Windows already had a massive installed base. The nature of portable computers and PDAs is that compatibility is a good thing. Even though Microsoft's OS is pretty shitty, at least people could use their Windows stuff on their portable.

      This is a totally different market - the music consumer. As far as "compatibility" goes, Microsoft has no advantage, because the iPod and iTunes is what you need to be compatible with. Basically, the PDA market was an easy "embrace, extend, extinguish" a classic Microsoft move. That won't work here.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    5. Re:Palm, anyone? by Taimoor · · Score: 1

      In my pocket, and my father's pocket, and in most of my friend's pockets. Palm is doing rather well in the PDA market.

    6. Re:Palm, anyone? by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Now we know who owns the three devices they sold this year :)

      --
      My other car is first.
    7. Re:Palm, anyone? by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      Yep, I haven't used a PDA since I got my Treo. When I purchased my Treo, I had the option of a Windows or Palm-based system. I went with Palm. Having programmed both Windows and Palm apps, I knew which one to trust. I've heard people with horror stories of their Treo's constantly resetting. It's happened to me only once or twice in 11 months, and I'm 99% sure it's due to an aways-on IM program that I wish the author would fix. But other than that, zero problems.


      Palm Treo's are excellent at what they do and don't make an unnecessary effort to do things they shouldn't. It's still a PDA-phone, not a laptop phone. I don't want Windows and its host of problems on my phone.

  14. Flaccid? by smartin · · Score: 5, Funny

    You mean Micro and Soft?

    --
    The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
    1. Re:Flaccid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flaccid, eh? Does that mean it can't squirt, then? Strangely despite of this, Micro(&)soft likes to screw its customers and partners.

  15. Microsoft and hardware by arth1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I spot a pattern with Microsoft releasing hardware. They do it late, they make big and clonky hardware, and they tie it to their operating system.
    Exhibit 1: PocketPC. It flopped twice before taking off, and by then, it was too late, because the PDA was already a sinking star and most people needing the functionality bought smartphones instead. There was no way that a HUGE and clumsy PocketPC device of ~year2000 was going to compete with the dapper Palm V/Vx, and it didn't. Too big, too mediocre, too late.
    Exhibit 2: Microsoft Phone. Anyone remember those? Wireless landline phones which hooked into your PC and gave you an on-screen warning about who was calling and a summary of all calls. Well, the thing was HUGE, could only be used with certain PCs, and flaws like someone rebooting a PC tossing people off-line. And by the time it came out, most phones already had all that functionality built in to the phone. The MS phone didn't have a display, the competition did. Too big, too mediocre, too late.
    Exhibit 3: Zune. Compare this to the iPod Nano or Sony Ericsson Walkman phones. It's too big, too mediocre, too late.

    There's other examples of failed MS hardware too, like tablet PCs (which were re-launched no less than THREE times before finally finding a niche). The only MS hardware I can think of that has achieved some success are the keyboards and joysticks (although I would think Logitech holds a much bigger market share).

    Regards,
    --
    *Art

    1. Re:Microsoft and hardware by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Windows mobile is big now days.

    2. Re:Microsoft and hardware by KokorHekkus · · Score: 1
      Windows mobile is big now days.
      Only problem is that it isn't generating any direct profit. It's been a economic sinkhole (albeit a smaller one than Xbox) until last year when they made a stunning 2 (yes, two) million profit in the Mobile and Embedded division. Looks like they're basically giving away the stuff to me.

      The number on how much each division makes can be found in their 10-K report that they file with the SEC. Filings are available at www.sec.gov.
    3. Re:Microsoft and hardware by zlogic · · Score: 1

      Pocket PCs aren't made by Microsoft, they're something more like Dell's boxes with OEM Windows pre-installed. Microsoft makes only general hardware specs and the OS.
      And Microsoft's keyboards & mice are quite good.

    4. Re:Microsoft and hardware by Blimey85 · · Score: 1

      What about the xbox? I don't know if you can call it a failure and it's too early to know what will happen in the xbox vs ps3 vx wii death brawl. I for one really liked my xbox. It was my fav console of that generation. I just picked up a 360 about a week ago so I could play Gears of War and Dead Rising.

      The xbox is another example of MS joining the party late. They made the largest console and it wasn't as refined as the other offerings. They threw a lot of money at the situation and they did well enough to have a second go with the 360. This might just be the one time they get it right and finally dominate in something hardware related.

      --
      How is it that one careless match can start a forest fire, but it takes a whole box to start a campfire?
    5. Re:Microsoft and hardware by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Correct and incorrect. The first few devices were so rigidly controlled by Microsoft that it didn't matter much what brand name outside said -- that was mostly design, much like video cards from the two manufacturers today. And even Microsoft-branded devices (like the before mentioned Microsoft phone) weren't actually manufactured by Microsoft either, so it goes both ways. I'd say it's not so much what the brand says or who runs the factory, but who designs something and owns the technology, and that's Microsoft. And they seem to have failed as much as they have succeeded.

  16. Mistakes the have made by davidmcg · · Score: 1

    It's going to be a year before the launch in the EU (if they even bother now), here's a list of lessons they need to learn before they launch over here.

    1. Re:Mistakes the have made by linuxci · · Score: 1

      Some good points there. I do agree that having Ballmer associated with the device is a negative. But also the marketing tactics used would not work in the UK (e.g. 'The Social' is another word for our welfare benefits office in the UK) - not that they really worked in the US anyway!

  17. Doomed from the get go. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what you get for introducing a player that supports all the sucky audio formats (mp3, wma) and none of the good ones (vorbis) :-p

    1. Re:Doomed from the get go. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, truly Apple has learned of the horrible consequences that leaving out Ogg Vorbis support has on sales.

      Oh, wait...

  18. Battle Hymn of the Republic, re-updated by Ninjaesque+One · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Zune;
    It is trampling out the storage where the Costless Tunes are store'd,
    It hath loosed the flaccid lighting of its terrible short release;
    Its songs are marching out.

    Glory, glory, hallelujah!
    Glory, glory, hallelujah!
    Glory, glory, hallelujah!
    Its songs are marching out!

    I have seen it in the watch-fires of a hundred wary bands!
    They have builded it an altar in the circling doom and damp;
    I can read its righteous screen by the dim and flaring lamps;
    Its songs are marching out.

    (chorus)

    I have read a fiery gospel written in burnished rows of plastic;
    "As you deal with my develop'rs, so with you my grace will deal,"
    Let the Ballmer, born of spittle, kill the serpent with a chair;
    The Zune is marching out.

    (chorus)

    In the beauty of the birch, Linus was born across the sea;
    With a glory in his boxen that transfigures you and me;
    As he hacked to make boxes holy, let us code to make Windows free;
    While the Zune is marching out.

    (chorus)

    It is coming like the glory of the storm upon the farm-er,
    It is Horror to the drummer, it is Destruc'shn to the bass,
    So the world shall be its crypt, and the soul of Jobs its David;
    The Zune is marching on.

    (chorus)

    (if you're wondering why it's re-updated, go look at this:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Battle_Hymn_of_th e_Republic%2C_Updated

    --
    Ninjas and pirates. How piquant.
  19. More proof there's more to the iPod than marketing by theurge14 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sure, we all understand nobody likes the king of the hill, no matter if it is deserved or not.

    But I hope this helps put to rest the continued notion that iPods only sell so well only because they are a marketing gimmick or some status symbol only to be worn to look 'cool'.

    The iPod is, for years now, been a well designed and well executed product. The scroll wheel introduced with the first iPod minis soon appeared on the complete iPod line when everyone including Apple realized it is what seperates it from all the other mp3 player interfaces. Well, it did until Zune and many others tried to imitate it.

    The iTunes interface won over many converts from Winamp and Musicmatch Jukebox before they even owned an iPod. Simplicity and power won over again. The iTMS isn't the best selling store by accident.

    Sure, the iPod is hyped, but perhaps it is for a good reason. People aren't dropped hundreds of dollars because they're stupid. At least for not this long and for this many years and different iPod models. Has there been a single iPod model that flopped?

  20. Re:More proof there's more to the iPod than market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People aren't dropped hundreds of dollars because they're stupid

    lol

  21. MS Marketing "pulled a brown Zune" by hmbcarol · · Score: 4, Funny

    The work "Zune" may enter the lexicon as a word akin to Edsel or Pinto.

    I heard a guy at work yesterday mentioning Sony's battery recall and commenting they "pulled a brown Zune" in terms of their marketing failure to deal with the problem correctly. (Brown being the least popular color for the Zune).

    Think of the uses... "The Republicans got handed a Zune in the last election".

    1. Re:MS Marketing "pulled a brown Zune" by Zonk+(troll) · · Score: 1

      Brown Zune? Does Ubuntu make it?

      --
      "The Federal Reserve is a fraudulent system."--Lew Rockwell
      End The FED. -
    2. Re:MS Marketing "pulled a brown Zune" by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      (Brown being the least popular color for the Zune).

      Strangely enough, brown is not the least popular color according to Amazon's sell rankings

      As of this posting...

      #26 Black
      #85 Brown
      #254 White

    3. Re:MS Marketing "pulled a brown Zune" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It still boggles my mind that they released a MP3 player the color of turds. I mean, there are just some colors you don't use.

      White Ketsup: Bird Droppings
      Purple Mustard: Gay
      Neon Orange car: Eyesore

      That and the fact that Zune doesn't play DivX, and isn't a mass storage device! WTF?!

    4. Re:MS Marketing "pulled a brown Zune" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      by the way, "Zune" in Hebrew means "fucking"

  22. I almost feel sorry for Microsoft... by jadobbins · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...but not really.

    --
    "There is no Honor, without Pie."
    -Weeble
    1. Re:I almost feel sorry for Microsoft... by apostle+matt · · Score: 1

      OK Dodgeballer.

      --
      lowmileageengines.com
  23. Slashdot post distribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    99% posts that in one way or another pick Microsoft apart
    0.5% intressting reads
    0.5% dupes of above

    Sad place this have become.

    1. Re:Slashdot post distribution by davidmcg · · Score: 1, Troll
      99% posts that in one way or another pick Microsoft apart 0.5% intressting reads 0.5% dupes of above Sad place this have become.

      Become? Slashdot has never been pro-Microsoft, except now, there's a lot more MS fanboys reading the site making posts that keep claiming that 99% of the comments are anti-MS.

      So what's so bad about picking Microsoft apart anyway? Are we supposed to hype up something that's not particularly good but because it's Microsoft we have to like it? If we don't fell 100% affection for MS we're being unfair?

      Microsoft have screwed many people in the past, why be lenient on them. They have to go the extra mile to prove themselves to us because we've had so many bad experiences from them. Things like

      • Ballmer making threats about Linux IP without going into specifics
      • Microsoft's treatment of Plays for Sure customers
      • Delayed, buggy software that drops all the promised features (Vista)
      • No commitment to the customer (IE6 stagnant until competition appeared, paying royalties to record companies per zune sale because they think we're music theives, etc)
      So why shouldn't we be critical of them? Why do they deserve special treatment?
    2. Re:Slashdot post distribution by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      You must be new here.

    3. Re:Slashdot post distribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its boaring and predictable and reads like a cheap UK tabloid, thats whats sad, you write according to a template and you will be rewarded for you loyalty, not because you have anything new or interessting to say.

      There is more interesting points to discuss and post then "Microsoft did XYZ", 50 times a week.

    4. Re:Slashdot post distribution by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      So that being the case, my question is, Why are you in a "Microsoft did X" thread?

      I think you just like complaining. It'd be like me running into a church and going "Why are there so many BIBLE THUMPERS in here?"

      Except *THAT* would be funny.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    5. Re:Slashdot post distribution by scull7 · · Score: 1

      Well, something must have held your interest to get this far.

  24. Check out Microsoft's wrongdoing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's here: http://malfy.org/

  25. here's the thing... by spirit_fingers · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The really frustrating thing about the Zune is that it is essentially a terrific product. The problem is Microsoft's insistence at putting the interests of vendors first and the interests of their customers a distant second. If they'd only let the damn hardware do all it could do, the thing would be selling like hotcakes. The Zune's wi-fi capability COULD let you share whole playlists, and COULD let you be a DJ and stream to several Zunes simultaneously, and COULD let you share music without wrapping it in arbitrary DRM and COULD let you sync it with a PC without a cable. It could also let you use it as a hard drive and let you sync it with a Mac or a Linux box. But no. Instead, Microsoft's DRM tightassness won't let the Zune be all it could be and what we have now will go down in history as the Bob of music players.

    1. Re:here's the thing... by Shippy · · Score: 1

      I think there are softare issues to think about as well. Sure, they could have thrown all those features in, but likely it wouldn't have been out for the holiday season.

      --
      -Shippy
    2. Re:here's the thing... by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      "Hello. My name is Bob Zune. It looks like you are writing a letter..."

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    3. Re:here's the thing... by astrosmash · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If Microsoft wants to sell copyrighted music they have to do what the copyright holders want. That's where the crippled hardware and DRM comes from. And unlike Apple, Microsoft cannot negotiate from a position of strength; they will do what they're told, or they won't have a music store. Microsoft even went so far as to give Universal $1 from every Zune sold. Pathetic!

      I hate how virtually every tech company bends over backwards for the entertainment industry. No one company, except for Apple, has stood up to entertainment industry in any substantial way, and as a result they and their customers suffer.

      --
      ENDUT! HOCH HECH!
    4. Re:here's the thing... by stoneycoder · · Score: 0

      Remember the 1st xbox, not so popular when it came out, everyone complaining it was the size of a house, etc. Then a few years down the road... you can mod it without a hardware upgrade, install linux, all kinds of emulators, and pretty much do whatever you want with it. Thats when I actually bought one. I always wondered if microsoft kinda did that on purpose.

      HOPEFULLY, the same thing will happen with the zune, someone will hack the crap out of it, release the code for all to enjoy, and we can use the wi-fi to its full potential. And if we're lucky, maybe install linux (and you thought YOUR wireless chipset was a pain to get drivers for)!

    5. Re:here's the thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The Zune...COULD let you be a DJ and stream to several Zunes simultaneously...


      That's got to be reason number one why mature adults will never want one. The idea of dozens and dozens of zit-faced Emos and beanie boys fighting each other's Zune stream in every public space to be the uber-DJ puts me right off.
    6. Re:here's the thing... by MK_CSGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ditto.
      Take FM recording for example - with Zune you can listen to the radio but not record.
      My 64$ player can do that (and in WMA too :P ).

    7. Re:here's the thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could we install .. u know .. Linux on it?

    8. Re:here's the thing... by istartedi · · Score: 1

      I doubt it. In fact, they probably spent a lot of time preventing those features from working.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    9. Re:here's the thing... by Shippy · · Score: 1

      The thing went from whiteboard to store shelves in about a year. I doubt they wasted their time purposefully "breaking" features.

      --
      -Shippy
    10. Re:here's the thing... by istartedi · · Score: 1

      Since many of the aforementioned features are blocked by DRM, they had to implement DRM. If that isn't spending time to break a feature, I don't know what is. Also, I would think that if MS just took the software they had lying around, and ported to the player, it would act as a hard drive by default. No, they probably had to spend some effort to make a hard drive, which accepts all files by default, only accept files under certain conditions. Get it?

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    11. Re:here's the thing... by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 2, Funny

      The really frustrating thing about the Zune is that it is essentially a terrific product.

      Dude, it's fucking brown.

    12. Re:here's the thing... by 6ULDV8 · · Score: 1

      It's brown as a proper turd should be. Don't you have ANY marketing knowledge? Now they can follow the theme and produce balance sheets in the same "Zune" colored font so that shareholders can be assured which end of the stick they've been handed.

      Even as a failure, Zune still has great potential... as a verb: "d00d, you really Zuned(tm) that exam!"

      --
      Pull my finger for my public key.
    13. Re:here's the thing... by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Well, unless someone would port Linux to it, in which case it will sell on Ebay like hot Cuecats...

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    14. Re:here's the thing... by p.rican · · Score: 1
      The problem is Microsoft's insistence at putting the interests of vendors first and the interests of their customers a distant second. If they'd only let the damn hardware do all it could do, the thing would be selling like hotcakes. The Zune's wi-fi capability COULD let you share whole playlists, and COULD let you be a DJ and stream to several Zunes simultaneously, and COULD let you share music without wrapping it in arbitrary DRM and COULD let you sync it with a PC without a cable.

      I hear all of this blather about "Microsoft's DRM" destroying a potentially useful feature and I can't believe people can be that short-sighted on why the DRM is there in the first place. By no means am I Microsoft apologist, but do you seriously think that Microsoft could even think of launching a portable music player without some sort of "leash" on the music to keep the record labels happy? If you're going to bash the product, put the blame where it should be; appeasing the record labels so Microsoft can offer a library somewhat comparable to what iTunes offers.

      A lesser known fact* is that Microsoft almost had to launch the product without the music library from Universal Music Group (U2 for one example) because Universal also wanted a cut of each Zune sold ($1 for every $250 Zune sold). Don't you think that will affect any future negotiations that Apple will have Universal?

      *Rolling Stone Magazine November 30, 2006 page 20

      --

      /. --"Demented and sad....but social" -Judd Nelson

    15. Re:here's the thing... by yoasif · · Score: 1

      It isn't the end user's concern whether Microsoft is interested in marketing and selling a vertically integrated music player and store.

      If they had simply stuck with their Plays4sure program, they could have easily "unleashed" the product to do whatever you want to files that are not DRMed, creating a much more enoyable (and useful) experience for the end user.

      If Microsoft doesn't have the guts to stand up to a bunch of record industry thugs who are not allowing sharing of DRMed files, files that they have no business caring about anyway, Microsoft simply doesn't deserve the money for selling a purposely crippled product.

      We know Microsoft is kowtowing to the record companies, but would the record companies simply have pulled their support for all online stores using Plays4Sure and left Apple's store as the only one standing? Doubtful.

      The reason Microsoft is paying Universal (and crippling their hardware) is because of greed; they want to own their own music store and not share it with Napster, Real, et al.

    16. Re:here's the thing... by yoasif · · Score: 1

      ugh... made some mistakes in the last post... here it is, corrected.

      It isn't the end user's concern whether Microsoft is interested in marketing and selling a vertically integrated music player and store.

      If they had simply stuck with their Plays4sure program, they could have easily "unleashed" the product to do whatever you want to do to files that are not DRMed, creating a much more enoyable (and useful) experience for the end user.

      If Microsoft doesn't have the guts to stand up to a bunch of record industry thugs who are not allowing sharing of unDRMed files, files that they have no business caring about anyway, Microsoft simply doesn't deserve the money for selling a purposely crippled product.

      We know Microsoft is kowtowing to the record companies, but would the record companies simply have pulled their support for all online stores using Plays4Sure and left Apple's store as the only one standing? Doubtful.

      The reason Microsoft is paying Universal (and crippling their hardware) is because of greed; they want to own their own music store and not share it with Napster, Real, et al.

    17. Re:here's the thing... by Karlt1 · · Score: 1
      "lesser known fact* is that Microsoft almost had to launch the product without the music library from Universal Music Group (U2 for one example) because Universal also wanted a cut of each Zune sold ($1 for every $250 Zune sold). Don't you think that will affect any future negotiations that Apple will have Universal?" No it won't have any affect on Apple. Let's look at the facts.
      • The labels already tried to put pressure on Apple to allow variable rate pricing. Apple said no. Guess who won?
      • Sony refused to license its catalog to Apple in Japan because of its refusal to allow variable rate pricing. Apple launched iTunes without Sony. The artists complained. Sony is now on iTunes Japan.
      • Apple only makes about $0.10 per song sold on iTunes after paying licensing fees. The label makes $0.65. If Apple sells 40 million iPods next year. That's $40 million it will have to give to Universal. Apple will have to sell 400 million songs from Universal to break even. Not very likely to happen.
      • If Apple gives Universal $1.00 per song it will also have to give the other labels $1.00 that brings the total up to $160 Million even less likely to happen.
      • Apple is the #5 retailer of music. Period. Not just online. The only companies to sell more are Walmart, Target, Best Buy, and Amazon. Apple will probably overtake Amazon next year. Do you really think any label is going to give up the iTunes cash cow?
      • The average iPod user only has 21 songs from the store. They could care less whether Universal is on iTunes
      • What is more likely to happen if someone can't find music on iTunes: a) they will give up their iPod and buy a Zune b) they will go to a record store and buy the CD to get the one song they want or c) Download it using their favorite p2p client?
    18. Re:here's the thing... by Virgil+Tibbs · · Score: 1
      what u want is to make one run linux with a nice "fimware" update

      then make it into what you want it to be

      if somebody made it easy and implemeted it well

      it cou;d be the first MS product to seel well because of its capabilities to run linx

      I'm prbably dreaming

      --
      www.tdobson.net #### Dare to Dream #### blog.tdobson.net
    19. Re:here's the thing... by Mia'cova · · Score: 1

      Or simply some cracks. The 3 day/3 play thing is enforced by the software and some metadata. There's no encryption of the songs going on. It makes me wonder if they're secretly leaving the door wide open for that to be disabled on mass. Who knows, maybe it really will be that simple. There are certainly people tearing them apart looking for holes as we speak...

    20. Re:here's the thing... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I understand your points, though I have a few quibbles, I do understand

      I never thought that syncing without a cable made sense because the battery needs to be charged at some point, might as well do it during syncing. Using WiFi cuts down the run time by a whole hour anyway.

      I don't think that Microsoft can afford to sell wireless for sharing files the way you want because it would clearly be seen as enabling massive copyright infringement. That would make Microsoft a too-tempting target for litigation.

      I would expect that there will be a community project to either hack the existing firmware or replace it with Linux + other software to do what you want. I don't expect it to come out for a while, and I would not buy it now in the hopes that the replacement firmware will be good.

    21. Re:here's the thing... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      And unlike Apple, Microsoft cannot negotiate from a position of strength; they will do what they're told, or they won't have a music store.

      I don't see why not. It's not like Apple had a terribly strong position when they opened up the iTMS.

  26. The Zune could have been a hit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But the handful of other posters are dead-on accurate as to why the Zune is going to fail.

    There is already word of mouth that the Zune is encumbered with myriad of limitations. The whole product launch follows a very traditional marketing strategy complete with a flash yet typical advertising campaign. In the days of yore, a company could manufacture hype for a product. Before the internet, word of mouth spready very, very slowly. Now, if you fuck it up -- you're done. Really done.

    Who was Microsoft marketing the Zune to exactly? One could only hope that they would have actually done some market research on their target demographic. Enough to know that these people aren't as gullible as they once thought. Clearly, this isn't the case.

    The product itself follows the mantra of design-by-deception. Forget all of the stuff about DRM and fair-use. Although that did play a part, the true problem with the Zune is that it was a product manufactured by people who really didn't want it to succeed. The modus operandi of corporations is to build a system to maintain the status quo. We're in a period of time where innovation threatens the life blood of the huge conglomorate. Sure, this threat has always existed -- but not to such a degree as it does today. The unwritten motivation for every decision is to make sure that everything is built to keep things from progressing beyond a company's capacity to adapt. Adaptation brings risk, and nobody in a position of executive privilege truly wants to accept responsibility for a failure, or responsibility for controlling risk. It's PMI training gone haywire.

    So, how does this manifest? The Zune is a perfect example. They see the threat coming, they don't want to assume any risk, they design a product to fail and thus hurt the industry where the so-called rising star is coming from, and maintain the status quo.

    It's truly brilliant, but this strategy is never laid on paper. It's never communicated. It's simply the ebb and flow of business, which is itself a manifestation of the human being's drive towards power and influence, which is completely derived from human desire for their memory to outlive their physical being due to doubts about the true meaning of life and death.

    In an ironic twist, many don't realize that by being a part of the problem, by sacrificing forward progress, they are in fact going against the very nature of man's ambitions. This is, of course, manic. It's probably why we built the bomb, build biological weapons, etc. It's the vain hope that someday somebody actually will make a mistake and wipe us all out, so that some creature down the road might learn from our mistakes and by doing so, we may have a final, romantic sense of redepmtion for our own.

    1. Re:The Zune could have been a hit... by gaspar+ilom · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, tell me if I'm getting this right, A C...

      The Zune was set-up to fail -- in order to sabotage future market demand for a similarly-featured product?

      **AND** this strategy is part of the Circle of Life and the eternal struggle of Man?

    2. Re:The Zune could have been a hit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi:

      I'm in Mensa and I couldn't follow this argument.

      T.

    3. Re:The Zune could have been a hit... by The-Bus · · Score: 1
      In the days of yore, a company could manufacture hype for a product. Before the internet, word of mouth spready very, very slowly. Now, if you fuck it up -- you're done. Really done*.


      * Does not apply to Sony (seemingly).
      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  27. iTunes Music Store only looks like a lock in. by no+reason+to+be+here · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At frist glance it might seem like a lock in, but look at it carefully. You can listen to an ITMS song on your computer, up to 4 other computers, burn it to a CD, or listen to it on your iPod. The biggest thing to remember is that once you've burned it to a CD, it's pretty much open season what you can do with it then.

    1. Re:iTunes Music Store only looks like a lock in. by Carrot007 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah burn lossy, rip and re-encode.

      I'll buy from itunes when I can download lossless and burn to cd. Still when that day comes why bother with the DRM?

      I'll keep on ripping my cd's in flac and using my IAudio to play them thanks.

      --
      +----------------- | What is the question!
    2. Re:iTunes Music Store only looks like a lock in. by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Zune marketplace songs can be played on your computer, your Zune and burned to CD as well.

    3. Re:iTunes Music Store only looks like a lock in. by iroll · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you represented any significant percentage of the market, Apple might care about you. Of course they don't!

      Joe Six-Pack doesn't see iTunes' DRM getting in his way. In fact, the only time he notices it is when he types in his password (once in a blue moon), to get another computer authorized on his iTunes account. He doesn't notice the compression artifacts; he doesn't even know what "lossy" means.

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    4. Re:iTunes Music Store only looks like a lock in. by xwizbt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Right, but if you agree that you can write and re-encode, you can also use Hymn or something to remove the DRM. By which I mean that if you accept that burning and ripping your track isn't a crime, then bypassing the burn and rip process and simply stripping off the DRM is also perfectly legal. And if you're the sort of person who is bothered by the quality of the burn and rip process then you're the sort of person who's techy enough to use Hymn.

      For the rest of us, burn and rip is great; the iTunes music store's DRM is exactly the right balance if you ask me.

    5. Re:iTunes Music Store only looks like a lock in. by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      I agree that you lose quality when re-encoding a song bought from iTunes, and I won't even touch anything with DRM. But you are missing the point: Most people don't care about such quality loss, and burn their downloaded songs to CDs anyway; and they will choose the ITMS because other online music stores won't even allow them to do that.

                -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    6. Re:iTunes Music Store only looks like a lock in. by dangitman · · Score: 1
      Yeah burn lossy, rip and re-encode.

      So? It still means you aren't locked in. It's far superior to those other stores that don't let you burn a CD at all. Wouldn't you rather be able to burn a lossy copy to CD, than have no option whatsoever?

      If you don't like the quality, don't use it. But don't claim people are locked in, when they aren't.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    7. Re:iTunes Music Store only looks like a lock in. by dangitman · · Score: 1

      But Zune marketplace is only a brand-new arrival on the market. Many of the Plays For Sure stores didn't offer CD burning, or made you pay extra for the CD burning option. Zune marketplace hardly seems relevant to iTunes' popularity, as it was not around when iTunes gained its marketshare.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    8. Re:iTunes Music Store only looks like a lock in. by MojoStan · · Score: 1
      I think you're missing his point (or maybe I'm missing the point). Yes, iTunes songs burned to CD and played from that CD give acceptable quality for most people. However, ripping and re-encoding iTunes songs results in noticeably crappy sound quality (even on crappy earbuds).

      If people are going to mention or imply "burn and rip" as an counterargument against iTunes lock-in claims, then they should always mention this significant loss in sound quality (which many people find unacceptable for music they paid for). People should just accept the fact that the iPod will be the only digital audio player that will play iTunes store music at acceptable quality. This is an acceptable limitation for many people, who refuse to consider anything but an iPod. For many others, this is an unacceptable limitation.

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

    9. Re:iTunes Music Store only looks like a lock in. by indil · · Score: 1

      Yes, you are locked in. I've never found a way to legally play my legally-purchased iTunes music on my main OS, Ubuntu. iTune's DRM restricts what should be considered fair use: playing my songs wherever I want, whenever I want, on whatever I want, in whatever format I want, without having to burn and rip it first. Screw those guys.

    10. Re:iTunes Music Store only looks like a lock in. by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      I agree that you lose quality when re-encoding a song bought from iTunes, and I won't even touch anything with DRM.

      You don't necessarily lose quality by re-encoding a song from iTMS. Just re-encode it using Apple lossless. Sure, the file is going to get bigger in size, however the quality will be identical to what you downloaded.

      Yaz.

    11. Re:iTunes Music Store only looks like a lock in. by vought · · Score: 1

      Yes, you are locked in. I've never found a way to legally play my legally-purchased iTunes music on my main OS, Ubuntu.

      -How did you buy your music?
      -Does Apple claim that iTunes music is supported on Ubuntu?
      -Why did you choose a music format that is incompatible with your main OS? iTunes don't play on Solaris either, but you don't see sysadmins rising up against Apple's failure to support one of the leading server OSs out there...

      Face it - your're looking for a reason to complain, have access to a system that supports iTunes, but still choose to run an OS that doesn't work with iTunes.

      Why don't you just channel your energy into getting Apple to support Ubuntu with iTunes or dual-boot?

    12. Re:iTunes Music Store only looks like a lock in. by tfinniga · · Score: 1

      Besides saying 'me too', I'd also like to point out that you can't play iTunes-purchased songs on OS/2, MSDOS, or beOS.

      However, as mentioned, you can't buy them on those OSes in the first place. So, just burn CDs on the same OS you bought the songs on, rip them to MP3, quit complaining.

      --
      Powered by Web3.5 RC 2
    13. Re:iTunes Music Store only looks like a lock in. by indil · · Score: 1

      - I bought my music through iTunes.

      - I have no idea, I didn't read the EULA. Did you? If you did, congrats, you're one of the 0.01% that did. Sadly, that doesn't matter. You can't conjure up a legalese-fest document, have someone sign it, and then hold them to it in court. Why do you think most contracts require initials throughout the document? Answer: To indicate that the signer understands everything and didn't summarily accept the agreement stupidly. The iTunes EULA doesn't have you initial anything. Even if you disagree with that point, the premise of the iTunes DRM violates the basic assumption that consumers have: that they have the same rights they would have if they bought the music in CD-form. Obviously, iTunes DRM violates this assumption horribly.

      - I'm sorry, when was it announced that m4p was incompatible with Ubuntu? Oh, that's right, it wasn't, it's just an arbitrary data format. Apple just never made it possible for me to use my music anywhere I want. I'm sorry, maybe I'm old fashioned, but I expect that type of freedom from my music. If Apple can't guarantee that kind of freedom out of the box, then it shouldn't have those restrictions at all. If you feel like rolling over and letting Apple tell you what you can do with your music, then fine. But if Apple is going to impose its DRM on my music, then it damn well better make sure that I can play it however I like.

      I apologize if I seem condescending, I'm a little drunk right now. ;)

    14. Re:iTunes Music Store only looks like a lock in. by frederickroyceperez · · Score: 1

      If I use a program called Audio Hijack to record the encoded -as in iTunes store encoded- will that not pick up those images sans lockins ? I was under the impression the images recorded were recording produced sounds .This is a ponderous procedure requiring deliberation intent and individual attention (see - No Joke .) . So if this routine is missing something , from my primitive understanding of it , it is not the sound . So the loss is ? (WHAT!) . I ask this on behalf of my poor abused brain and my scared poopless ears (- see dem crazy bones) . I am assuming that the bit rate , according to your inferences , refers to more than the replay information outside the order of play and selection ID's . That means to my foggy smoking that reading 128 kbps only a fraction of that is reaching my eyes ears nose and throat . Right ?

    15. Re:iTunes Music Store only looks like a lock in. by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I guess that means no other store locks you in either - no matter how draconian the DRM is, as you can always run a cable from the line out on your computer to the line in and re-record the file.

      However, as far as I'm concerned, Apple is locking you in, with DRM that only allows you to play the files on a limited number of machines that must run iTunes and Quicktime, and DRM that keeps you from playing the files on any non-Apple branded music player. I'm not too interested in inconvienent workarounds that degrade the quality even more.

    16. Re:iTunes Music Store only looks like a lock in. by dangitman · · Score: 1
      no matter how draconian the DRM is, as you can always run a cable from the line out on your computer to the line in and re-record the file.

      But this is not officially allowed. At least Apple gives permission to record a CD, and it is a lot quicker than recording in real-time.

      I'm not too interested in inconvienent workarounds that degrade the quality even more.

      How does burning to CD "degrade the quality even more"? It will sound exactly the same as the original file being played back on your computer.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  28. Not true by NineNine · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's simply not true. Apple has the worst lock in sceme in the entire consumer electronics industry, yet people line up outside their stores like they're in the former Soviet Union waiting for toilet paper. Slashdot geeks all hyped up on Jolt and Slashdot groupthink don't want lock in. Consumers at large couldn't care less.

    1. Re:Not true by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1
      That's simply not true. Apple has the worst lock in sceme in the entire consumer electronics industry

      No, they don't. As a matter of fact, most people have plain old MP3s on their iPods.
      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    2. Re:Not true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it funny that top MS execs leave and fire up new companies based on OSS, rather than on MS. It seems that those in the know, or are bright enough, know NOT to base their company on Windows.

      Have to admit that when I saw the headline, I thought more of your site than MS. Yours has been nothing but a slow leech with lots of bad pix. And that leaves me flaccid.

    3. Re:Not true by Blimey85 · · Score: 1

      Toilet paper?!?!? Haha you silly American. We never used toilet paper. No, in Soviet Russia we used crisp new $20 American bills. It was like... how you say... funny money to us... no that's not it... monopoly money... yes, like monopoly money to us. And the convenient size was pefect for wiping our Soviet hind quarters. Thank you Americans!

      --
      How is it that one careless match can start a forest fire, but it takes a whole box to start a campfire?
    4. Re:Not true by NineNine · · Score: 0

      And the program that you have to use to put the MP3's on your iPod? iTunes.

      The one OS that you can run on your Apple box? OSX.

      The only way you can run OSX? Buy an Apple.

      If that's not lock-in, then I don't know what is.

    5. Re:Not true by Steve001 · · Score: 1

      Overly Critical Guy wrote and included with a post:

      That's simply not true. Apple has the worst lock in sceme in the entire consumer electronics industry

      No, they don't. As a matter of fact, most people have plain old MP3s on their iPods.

      I am one of those individuals: virtually all of the files on my iPod are MP3 files that I ripped from my own CDs. The ability to play ordinary MP3 files prevents you from being locked into the iPod and is one of the factors in its success.

      I think that any player which does not support the MP3 format is doomed to failure because of the lock in issue. For myself, I will disregard any compressed audio player that does not allow you to directly play (meaning without conversion) MP3 files. I would not be surprised if many other people think the same way.

      Although other formats may sound better at the same bitrate (I simply encode my MP3s has a higher bitrate to deal with that issue, 1.5MB per minute instead of 1MB per minute is not a concern for me), the vast support of the MP3 format provides a good reason for me to choose it over other, less supported, formats. Also working against other formats (especially purchased music) is the whole DRM issue. This will cause many people to purchase their music in the CD format, rather than any DRMed format.

    6. Re:Not true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's referring to Apple computers, not iPods.

    7. Re:Not true by entrylevel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wrong, wrong (1|2), and wrong.

      --
      Karma: Incomprehensible (Mostly affected by posting at +5, reading at -1, and metamoderating everything unfair.)
    8. Re:Not true by NineNine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, big deal. Anybody can hack anything. Any of this stuff is likely not to work very well, and it's certainly not supported by Apple. Lock-in is lock-in, no matter how many kludgy workarounds people build. People wouldn't have to build these things in the first place if not for the lock-in.

    9. Re:Not true by HAKdragon · · Score: 2, Informative

      And the program that you have to use to put the MP3's on your iPod? iTunes

      Don't forget Winamp, Ephpod, GNUpod, and others

      The one OS that you can run on your Apple box? OSX

      Also Linux, BSD, and Windows*


      *Requires Intel Mac

      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs. We have a protractor."
    10. Re:Not true by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I bet your wrong.

      I don't know anybody in the general population that had set their iTunes to rip to MP3.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    11. Re:Not true by entrylevel · · Score: 1

      Nothing Linux-related is supported by anyone "officially" unless you pay for it. Nonetheless, libipod works extremely well. I use my 1st gen iPod Nano with Listen and Quod Libet and it works flawlessly. This was after my iPod had been artificially "locked" to my iBook by iTunes.

      Apple will support boot camp when it is included with the next version of OS X.

      Apple actively fights efforts to run OS X on non-Apple hardware, yet on documented hardware, it still works well.

      I didn't say anything about vendor lock-in. That's what vendors do. However, I suggest that the open source world wouldn't be half as fun and interesting as it is if we (people) didn't have to build these things (for free) to break out of vendor lock-in.

      --
      Karma: Incomprehensible (Mostly affected by posting at +5, reading at -1, and metamoderating everything unfair.)
    12. Re:Not true by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

      I never used iTunes to transfer songs to my iPod.

    13. Re:Not true by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      That's true for many consumers but if you're tech-savvy you can configure iTunes to rip CD's to .MP3 format. In fact, that's how I rip my CD's to play on my Creative Zen Nano Plus 512 MB portable music player.

    14. Re:Not true by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      I mostly have AAC files burnt from CDs. Vanilla AACs play fine even in Linux. The only lockin is the iTunes Music Store files I have which I bought from giftcards.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    15. Re:Not true by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      AAC is not a DRMed format. Apple uses FairPlay which is a DRM wrapper around AAC. It would be the same if they used MP3, only lower quality.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  29. Hurrah! Apple's near-monopoly is secure! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Remember kids, when Microsoft has a monopoly, that's bad, but when Apple has one, it's good!

  30. Don't forget the XBox by NineNine · · Score: 1

    Don't forget the XBox. I have had a PS2 for many years, and my girlfriend recently bought an XBox to play a single game. I couldn't believe what a piece of shit it was! It's huge compared to the PS2. At least 5 times as large, it's loud (both the fan, and the stupid menu when no disk is in makes some stupid cartoon robot sound), it's obnoxious, and all of the parts and controls on it look like they're made for retarded, giant, kindergarteners. It reminded me of the first time I saw the dashboard of a modern American car after always driving Japanese. Big, clunky, ugly, and cheap. Just the way most Americans want it.

  31. The Zune is flaccid? by Slithe · · Score: 4, Funny

    So I take it nobody's done any squirting yet?

    --
    ---- "XML is like violence. If it doesn't fix the problem, you aren't using enough."
    1. Re:The Zune is flaccid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, The iPod is white.......

  32. Remember Lotus 1-2-3, Palm and Netscape? by PopeZaphod · · Score: 1

    They used to be tops of their markets, and everyone laughed when M$ tried to compete with them. Now Lotus is a memory, Palm is a close second, and Netscape went open source in order to offer an alternative to the clear winner of the "Browser Wars". Oh, and let's not forget a little something called the XBOX and how we all laughed that it would ever be more popular than the PlayStation. I don't want M$ to succeed; I'm just afraid that history will repeat itself yet again.

    --
    ->
    1. Re:Remember Lotus 1-2-3, Palm and Netscape? by davidmcg · · Score: 1

      It'd be more successful if they didn't make such obvious mistakes. For the moment Apple and its other competitors have time to ensure they keep in the lead. The xbox is a loss leader, perhaps they make losses on the zune too, they can't keep running unprofitable ventures.

  33. Shhhh, Nobody Tell Him... by WiseWeasel · · Score: 1

    You do know that the iPod is by FAR and away the most popular MP3 player, right? It plays proprietary music (in addition to several standard formats) and has no FM radio receiver... So I'd say those features are not relevant to people's purchase decisions for MP3 players...

    --
    "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
  34. Between the title and company name by Fuzzball963 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd say flaccid is a good way of describing Microsoft ;).

    --
    "The boy is dangerous, they all sense it, why can't you?"
    1. Re:Between the title and company name by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      What I don't get- why use flaccid to describe the sales in the first place though? Usually, you can substitute opposites in, but regardless, when did flaccid become a socially acceptable way to describe something without the gross insinuation?

      Microsoft is 'flaccid' in some respects, but many of their departments are quite strong and I don't think that it can properly categorize MS as a whole.

    2. Re:Between the title and company name by Nicolay77 · · Score: 1

      Yes, they have hard balls.

      And the OS has "hairy" code.

      --
      We are Turing O-Machines. The Oracle is out there.
    3. Re:Between the title and company name by spisska · · Score: 1

      Seems like flaccid is a pretty apt description to me, particularly the second meaning in each definition.

      Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.0.1)
      flaccid /flæksd, flæsd/ -adjective
      1. soft and limp; not firm; flabby: flaccid biceps.
      2. lacking force; weak: flaccid prose.
      [Origin: 1610-20; L flaccidus flabby, equiv. to flacc(re) to grow weak, languish + -idus -id4]

      --Related forms
      flaccidity, flaccidness, noun
      flaccidly, adverb

      Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.0.1)
      Based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2006.

      American Heritage Dictionary -
      flaccid (flsd, flksd)

            1. Lacking firmness, resilience, or muscle tone. See Synonyms at limp.
            2. Lacking vigor or energy: flaccid management.

      [Latin flaccidus, from flaccus, flabby.]
      flaccidity (-sd-t) or flaccidness n.
      flaccidly adv.

      The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
      Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
      Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.

    4. Re:Between the title and company name by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      It didn't help matters that Ballmer himself talked about "squirting" music and photos to other Zunes, which, along with the brown colour most commonly associated with the Zune, was easily a gross insinuation right from the horse's mouth.

      Zune, incidentally, is phonetically identical to a euphemism French Quebec parents might use with their kids to refers to their penis or vagina (reference).

  35. Huh ... hello? by Augusto · · Score: 1

    The product sold out, irregardless of what the current price on ebay is. And people did line up to buy it, there's certainly more demand for PS3s right now than for the Zune.

    That the price has dropped on ebay is great news, it's stupid to buy this console at such ridiculous prices (including the 1200 you listed there, it's just stupid)

    --

    - sigs are for wimps.
    1. Re:Huh ... hello? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      irregardless is not a word.

    2. Re:Huh ... hello? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The product sold out because there was a small supply and a large number of people buying them for resale. If you were reading Slashdot yesterday, you'd have seen the story about one store where every single one they had in stock was bought for resale. eBay is about the only place you can still buy them, and it seems no one wants to.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:Huh ... hello? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      "The product sold out, irregardless of what the current price on ebay is. And people did line up to buy it, there's certainly more demand for PS3s right now than for the Zune."

      Yeah, I'm not a Sony fan but this might be more impressive than the 360 launch - time will tell (although there's no way I'm paying $600 to play games). People forget that, with the 360, most stores had 20 or less units at launch. With the PS3, most sellers had several hundred units.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:Huh ... hello? by Saige · · Score: 1

      ...with the 360, most stores had 20 or less units at launch. With the PS3, most sellers had several hundred units.

      If that's true, then it means the PS3 was available in a lot fewer places. The 360 launched with approximate 326,000 units available in the US. Sony's high estimate for the US launch was 400,000 units - but they also said 100,000 for Japan, and they only hit 88,000. There were articles going around that said that Sony was only going to have 150,000-200,000 units available. We'll just have to see what the numbers end up being.

      Regardless, unless Sony pulled a massive number of PS3s out of their ass, the PS3 launch numbers will be little better than the 360, if at all.

      BTW, from my understanding, most EB Games/Gamestop stores had fewer PS3s available than they did 360s to fill their preorders.

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
  36. Just needs to be marketed better by microcars · · Score: 3, Funny
    case in point: The Pet Rock

    Who would buy a Rock for a Pet? yet....it happened.
    There is a whole untapped market of gifts that are "not nice". I mean, what do you get someone in the family when you HAVE to get them a present, but you don't like them?

    Perhaps they could do a tie-in with those new "LearnAboutCoal.org" commercials and throw Santa in there too.

    SANTA: "Well, lets see little Johnny has been very Naughty this year, so he gets a lump of coal!"

    Johnny: "Well at least I can burn this and keep warm for a few minutes"

    SANTA: "And little Bobby has been especially naughty so he gets a Zune!"

    Bobby: "Whaaaa!!!......."

    [end tag]: UPS voiceover: "What can Brown do for YOU?"

    --
    I like microcars
  37. and? by TheCoop1984 · · Score: 1
    Hands up all those who are suprised.

    *queue tumbleweed*

    Ah we all knew it was gonna be a flop anyway. I guess what they say about microsoft and vacuum cleaners is true then...

    --
    95% of all computer errors occur between chair and keyboard (TM)
    1. Re:and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...they clean house?

  38. A better mousetrap..... by edwardpickman · · Score: 1

    Guess we know what happens when the mousetrap isn't better.

  39. Design by committee? by lawpoop · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is it just me or does MS seem to design everything by a giant committee, headed up by accountants and market-speak droids?

    The seem to be used to dealing with business customers who don't understand computers and don't want or need to -- they just know that MS is the 'best of breed' and MS will take care of their every need. They have no imagination and no ideas of their own about how a computer could solve their problems, or what they want out of it -- they just want to sit down at a training course and have MS tell them how a computer works and what to do with it. They are just there for the ride, eagerly consuming whatever lowest-common-denominator crap MS pumps out.

    Meanwhile, the younger kids coming up are computer savy, have a general idea of how computers work and what you can expect out of them, and most importantly what sucks and what doesn't. That's why the iPod has built such a strong brand -- not for its sleek styling, but for its user friendly interface. Instead of another button for another feature, it has *basically* one button (or two buttons, or one nested button) for *all* of its features. This is what the music listeners of today want -- an *easy* way to get to their music. This is worth repeating -- the iPod is simply the easiest path to their music. That's all.

    Meanwhile, the MS zune seems to be designed to please music labels and MS' own need for vendor lock-in, with its DRM, shoddy music store, and crappy sharing features. Go ahead, please everyone but the customer who you expect to pay for the privilege of using your crap. Though I must admit, it does work well in the business world.

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
    1. Re:Design by committee? by demon · · Score: 1

      MS' own need for vendor lock-in, with its DRM, shoddy music store

      You mean the one where the "PlaysForSure" tracks don't play on the Zune? The brand that Microsoft has supposedly been so interested in building for music sales - and it doesn't even work with their own brand new player? That's my favorite part. Just what we all need - a way to buy music that's incompatible with any other player. (At least with the iPod you have different models - there's only one Zune.)

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
    2. Re:Design by committee? by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Imagine this process, but done to the iPod itself. :)

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    3. Re:Design by committee? by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile, the younger kids coming up are computer savy, have a general idea of how computers work and what you can expect out of them, and most importantly what sucks and what doesn't.

      When it comes to computers most kids today are idiots, just like their parents. Just because it's around doesn't mean that they have a clue how it works or what sucks and what doesn't.

  40. Good thing Zune is not Microsoft's by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    only product. Otherwise they'll be on "the social" soon enough.

  41. Sometimes their hardware is good.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. shame about Windows :-).

    I've liked most of the early MS hardware like mice, keyboards and even the odd joystick - it was real good quality stuff.

    But I don't care one jot for all the hardware that locks me in, xbox included. I have an iPod because it supports MP3, and I'll buy the real CDs of music I like because (unlike anything electronic) it makes it always very easy to prove I actually bought the record and it's a decent backup.

    I haven't bothered with buying anything through iTunes, if they sell MP3 files I may but that doesn't seem likely, and there's no way I'm going to buy something I can't play elsewhere when I change my mind about the player.

    Ditto for PC - if DRM becomes unavoidable I will still avoid it by switching platform (go for a Mac, or use Ubuntu more than about 75% of the time). There are few reasons left for me to run Windows, and I can always buy a console for games. I can't see the point of paying extra for being forced to pay extra, if you see what I mean: we all pay the cost for the extra 'protection' without it having any benefit for ourselves. A bit like the Mafia of old, just electronic and this time government supported.

    Now, back from that digression: a company like MS can afford to throw a couple of millions at a market to see if it works. Call it a sort of R&D.

  42. Amazon customer reviews by Frankie70 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here.

    Most of them seem to be very favourable.
    First few days is really too early to judge a product sales figures.

    1. Re:Amazon customer reviews by MosesJones · · Score: 1

      First few days is really too early to judge a product sales figures

      As with Hollywood films the first few days are a great way to get an idea as to how a product will do, especially if its
      a) In an existing market
      b) Heavily advertised before launch
      c) Aiming at the "cool" or early adopter parts of the market

      Check out the launch stats for the iPod Mini and Nano for a good example of opening day sales in this market.

      This is very bad, especially for a product that had one clear difference from the iPod, but that is a difference that requires massive marketshare to be practical.

      --
      An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    2. Re:Amazon customer reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [erase message] How appropriate, the security word I have to type below is "fiction"...

  43. The iPod id ALL about marketing. by IANAAC · · Score: 1
    I mean, really. Have you driven anywhere and NOT seen an iPod billboard. Or taken a train and NOT seen 8 cars with iPod ads plastered on the side? Or did you miss Oprah and Bono shopping together for an iPod (and we all know how middle-aged women in the US take her word as gospel)?

    Seriously, Microsoft has not done anywhere near the amount of marketing that Apple has done. That may change the closer we get to Christmas, we'll see. Frankly, I think flooding the market with ads this close to the holidays is a wash.

    But to say that the iPod is popular because of its superior design is subjective. Surely you remember hearing about screen problems, surface scratching, sleep mode problems. Problems arise, they fix them (or at least we hope they do). I suspect any technical problems with the Zune will be addressed by Microsoft as well.

    1. Re:The iPod id ALL about marketing. by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Have you driven anywhere and NOT seen an iPod billboard. Or taken a train and NOT seen 8 cars with iPod ads plastered on the side?

            Yes. I don't live in the US, but rather a small third world country. There is no iPod advertising here. And yet the minute some kids brings theirs to school, all the other kids want one. I'm seeing more and more iPods on random people in the street now. It's a popular product because it's a good product, not just because of the advertising.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:The iPod id ALL about marketing. by revscat · · Score: 1

      No.

      If you have a multi-million dollar marketing campaign, but the product being marketed is not high quality, then that product will not succeed in the marketplace, especially over the long term. Marketing campaigns for new tangible consumer goods can, at best, provide a temporary up-front "here I am" effect. But word of mouth is far, far more important; if you have good word of mouth, then (and only then) will your success grow into the future.

      I own an iPod. I, and many others, can attest to the quality of the device, the software behind it, and the interaction between the two. This has nothing to do with wanting to be cool, or the newest iPod commerical. Rather it is based upon direct experience.

      That is why the iPod has seen such great success. Microsoft continues to fail when they enter new markets simply because they seem culturally unable to produce anything that is of truly superior quality, and instead believe as you do: that tricks of marketing or licensing are all it takes to make up for having mediocre products.

      This is not true, and hasn't been for many years.

    3. Re:The iPod id ALL about marketing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely you remember hearing about screen problems, surface scratching, sleep mode problems. Problems arise, they fix them (or at least we hope they do). I suspect any technical problems with the Zune will be addressed by Microsoft as well.

      No, there is a huge difference here. The iPod problems you list were unintentional flaws in the product which were not discovered until after it was on the market. But all of the Zune flaws that people are citing, whether it's the useless wifi, incompatibility with MS's existing music, the extreme ugliness of the case, the lesbian error messages, or one of the many other problems, are all there by design. They won't be fixed because Microsoft wants all of these ridiculous design flaws to be there.

    4. Re:The iPod id ALL about marketing. by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      Your logical error here is to assume that the existence of marketing denies the existence of features.

      Apple clearly market the hell out of the iPod. We see ads everywhere. I'm expecting ads on bananas soon (well, maybe not here in Australia where they're $16/kilo).

      But they've got a lot of substance behind that marketing. I've seen people pick up and iPod and figure it out in a few seconds. They master it in under a minute, with no coaching, no manuals, just by playing with it.

      The online store is similarly easy, as is the iTunes software. It's all so easy, so streamlined that people just "get it".

      Apple do a lot of marketing to get that message out, but from what I've seen and experienced, the marketing is based pretty solidly in reality.

  44. Frye's Ad by Izrath · · Score: 1

    I chuckled when I saw that the Best Buy and Frye's Electronics ad yesterday had no mention of the Zune.

  45. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The link in the parent post had some well thought out arguments about the mistakes that Microsoft have made and what needs to be done for it to have any chance of success in europe. Although the site looks like its been written by an apple fanboy, this article actually seems well thought out and the bias is minimal

    1. Re:Mod Parent Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Remember, a troll usually makes a generalized, simple-minded, and inflammatory remark "

      That describes the post I responded to quite well. Generalized out of context with no references to actuall fact.

  46. "Opening Zune Sales Flaccid" by frostilicus2 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Well, it is Micro soft .

    --
    Nothing sucks like a Vax, nothing blows like a PowerMac G4
  47. Such high hope by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    I had such high hopes for the Zune but Microsoft DRM'd it to death. I'm so tired of being told what I can an cannot do with music I've purchased. I know its only a 'license' but still, I paid real (ok, fictional) money for it.

    The actions of the RIAA and MPAA were the prime reasons for my becoming an EFF member.

  48. If no one wants them ... by Augusto · · Score: 1

    ... why are they selling for over 1K?

    Yes, there is a small supply, but for sure there's more demand for them than for the Zune (and more consumer awareness of it too, ask a random person what a Zune is and see what look you are going to get).

    If no one wants them, they wouldn't be selling on ebay at all.

    --

    - sigs are for wimps.
    1. Re:If no one wants them ... by maynard · · Score: 1

      ... why are they selling for over 1K?

      Two reasons:

      a) there remains enough demand to maintain price above retail. However, as noted, the price continues to fall. You can watch this happen in real time. Thus, a single price snapshot at $1200 is about as worthless a future price indicator as one at $3500.

      b) Many sellers are still abusing sham accounts to prop up bogus sale prices so they can relist. Presumably on the hope that it will later sell for more. It probably won't.

      But there must be a floor to the price drop, and that floor almost certainly will have to be higher than retail. Sellers spent a great deal of time and energy obtaining those PS3s on launch day. That represents human investment that sellers expect to generate a return from. The divergence between retail and sale price represents the "value" of their time. Assuming a 24 hour wait in line, that means double-retail is worth about $25/hr. 1.5 times retail, is thus worth about $12.50/hr. Then you have to add in eBay costs, packaging for shipment, etc.

      Also, I note that the 360 stayed above double markup or above for well over a month after release. The PS3 is hitting that point within a day after release, and is even more constrained for supply than the 360 was. This is an indicator of much less demand then during the launch of the 360.

    2. Re:If no one wants them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, I note that the 360 stayed above double markup or above for well over a month after release. The PS3 is hitting that point within a day after release, and is even more constrained for supply than the 360 was. This is an indicator of much less demand then during the launch of the 360.

      Good point. Also notice that when you go to the Ebay site, you find that the #1 item on their "top 10 most popular" is... the Xbox 360. And this is smack in the middle of the PS3 (and, to a much lesser extent, Wii) launch mania.

      One would have to say that the smart money is on Xbox 360 owning this generation.

    3. Re:If no one wants them ... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Almost nobody who was waiting in lines outside of the store was waiting to get a PS3 that they were actually going to play - most of the people waiting were hoping to resale them for a profit. I seriously doubt that all the gamers that wanted one right away decided to stay home and get gouged on eBay. I'm guessing the price on eBay reflects a combination of shill bidders, and other people hoping to get one for "cheap" and flip it for a profit more than actual gamers bidding these things up.

  49. Different Price Points by PoconoPCDoctor · · Score: 1

    If the Amazon list doesn't distinguish between different prices, it's pretty worthless. The San Disk player costs $139.00 USD. That's just the manufacturer's list price.

    A quick froogle search will save you 40 bucks.

    The Zune is 150 bucks more on the same site.

    I agree it's going to be a tough uphill climb for Zune to dethrone the iPod gorilla. Assuming the most casual shopper does even a little research, they'll probably get an iPod.

    --
    "Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair" - George Washington
    1. Re:Different Price Points by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Most consumers will do no research and still get an iPod.

    2. Re:Different Price Points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did a little research, and I bought a 60GB Creative Zen Vision M. Includes an FM tuner, can host USB connections so you can download photos *direct* from a camera, and handles video. Best of all, you don't have to use iTunes to load it.

      As another poster pointed out, most posts seem to indicate that its bad for MS to have a monopoly, but that its OK for Apple. That doesn't make any sense at all. They both have the same c r a p p y DRM issues. There are other alternatives....

    3. Re:Different Price Points by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1
      most posts seem to indicate that its bad for MS to have a monopoly, but that its OK for Apple.
      ...because Microsoft has abused its monopoly and Apple hasn't.
      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  50. zune sales by l3v1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, I'd never buy anything with lines like "Welcome to the social" on it anyway. I still have really hard times accepting it as being valid unfunny English with a meaning.

    --
    I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
    1. Re:zune sales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They heard the "Think Different" campaign, and though, "Hey, I can make a commercial with fractured English too!"

      But here's the thing with Microsoft.. They'll release a crappy product. It'll be crappy. They'll take a loss on it. Make it pretty. Take more losses. The competition starts hurting because of the price war. Soon there's just Microsoft. They have billions and did the same with with Netscape, XBox, virtualization, etc. etc..

    2. Re:zune sales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      and, in england, "the social" is welfare.

    3. Re:zune sales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would a Zune virus be known as a social disease?

    4. Re:zune sales by Ulfalizer · · Score: 1

      As well as in Sweden (socialen) :)
      Honestly, how much market research did they put into this one?

  51. nonsense by johnpaul191 · · Score: 1

    a while ago i remember reading Microsoft people said it might take 5 years to catch on. this was before the iPod even hit its 5th birthday.

    1) if it will be a supposed hit in 5 years, why buy one today?
    2) who knows what iPods, or any MP3 players will be in 5 years.

    just for reference take the first iPod (5 GB), jump 5 years to the nano (tiny! 8GB, color screen, lots of battery life etc). if they can not merge a good MP3 player with tons of storage in a cell phone in the next 5 years, then i quit. i am sure some sort of standalone players will exist (for running or whatever), video players, wifi whatever. if iPods still exist, i would guess they have a slow evolution. the simplicity is what makes them so popular.

  52. Longhorn by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    ...Oh wait, they renamed that to Vista. Nevermind, flaccid it is!

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  53. color by istartedi · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It's brown and it comes from Microsoft. Do I really need to say anything else?

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  54. Origami? by theurge14 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember hearing about the Origami project last year, what ever became of it?

    1. Re:Origami? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      It folded.

  55. Let's be sensible by tkrotchko · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't get why anybody would buy this when iPods are cheaper for the same capacity.

    There's already a considerable ecosystem of accessories and attachments for the iPod.

    It works with two open formats... mp3 and aac.

    iTunes works with Mac, Windows 2K, XP, and Vista.

    Does anybody want to buy this because they can send a song to a friend and he/she can listen to it 3 times. That's it? That's the feature I've gotta have? It doesn't even "Play for Sure!".

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    1. Re:Let's be sensible by Mia'cova · · Score: 1

      Much larger screen for video? Or maybe simply because you're getting bored of staring at the same old ipod interface every day and hey, customization might actually be nice. I like to mix things up just for the hell of it. I'm not trying to say the Zune is better or worse interface wise. But different is a feature when the market gets saturated.

      Just sayin, it's not without some legitimate appeal.

  56. price equal to iPod isn't gonna cut it by Locutus · · Score: 1

    The brilliant people at Microsoft thought they could wow the public with marketing and still keep the price at the same level as the iPod. What they don't seem to get is that not only is the iPod good at playing customers music but it's also got a cool factor, 'in' crowd, etc stigma attached to it that equal price isn't enough.

    Not until Microsoft starts selling the device at a good loss( like WinCE and Xbox ) and really undercut the competition, the Zune is soon to be doomed. IMO. I do think that Microsoft will drop the price on this since Bill G keeps pushing it like it's the next great thing and since they control the hardware( Xbox ) they can hide the losses in R&D or marketing or some other place. It'll probably sell well at $150 and definately not above $200. Only Microsoft fan-boys would purchase it at existing prices. Again, IMO.

    And like they did with Palm/PalmOS, the iPod is a threat to Windows in that it can grow a community totally outside the control of Microsoft. Grow a platform API( iTunes, iPod video, etc ) outside of Microsoft control and all this is a threat to Windows and the Windows monopoly. So they WILL drop the price and start taking a larger loss on the productline. Heck, they've LOST over $8billion on WindowsCE alone so losing a couple of billion on Zune to drop Appls marketshare to 50% is worth it to them. Remember, they must proect the WindowsOS gravy train.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    1. Re:price equal to iPod isn't gonna cut it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most times Microsoft would actually have to pay me to use their products, the Zune with all its DRM shit would be no exception.

  57. Two things... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Despite months of hype

    Maybe it's because I own a Tivo, but... what hype? I haven't seen anything on TV, in magazines, on buses, etc.

    And regarding the title of this thread, "Opening Zune Sales Flaccid" - do the editors' entire existences revolve around thoughts of sexual inadequacy? That's one of the silliest sentences I've seen put together anywhere. It's pathetic even by Slashdot's juvenile standards.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Two things... by parkov · · Score: 2, Informative

      Maybe it's your thoughts that revolve around thoughts of sexual inadequacy. flaccid (adj.) 1. Lacking firmness, resilience, or muscle tone. See synonyms at limp. 2. Lacking vigor or energy: flaccid management.

    2. Re:Two things... by Mia'cova · · Score: 1

      I think we're talking about hype along the lines of Engadget. Tech writers were pretty interested in the Zune, generating a lot of hype without any traditional marketing. Of course, now it's stepped up into that realm. And most of the ads would be targeted at an MTV style audience so expect your exposure to vary considerably with the shows you watch. The ads you see aren't random after all...

    3. Re:Two things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do the editors' entire existences revolve around thoughts of sexual inadequacy?


      Whose don't?
  58. IMO Zune is a joke! by wilgibson · · Score: 1

    iPod was great! Zune eh... everyone that wanted an iPod or something similar has probably gotten one. My Local EB Games got two in the day of release. Guess what... they still have two and so many accessories they can't even put them all out on the floor.

  59. Its yet another lame product from lame people! by NovaSupreme · · Score: 0

    well i have to say it, i cannot imagine this is from same company (/. jokes aside) that made one of the most useful (useful as in whats getting used) products of our time (windows).

    1. lets start from appearance. its big, bulky and brown. tries to imitate click wheel but has pushbutton beneath the wheel.. why the hell they have to copy ipod if they cannot due to click wheel patent. wheel is not the end of the world.

    2. user experience - websites are full of installation errors and the background picture they chose for it -- women having orgasm! can't they have QA'ed it some more on their own machines!

    3. wireless -- great idea implementde just the wrong way on all the wrong fronts. you cannot connect to your computer using wireless. it can only connect to buddies to whom you can trasnfer songs (3day/3times limit). on a device where poewr consumption is critical and zune already sucks, they chose to have .11 in a lame way just to differentiate from ipod.

    4. they have marketplace-- where you buy a song for 79 points (wtf dollars are for?). and you can buy 80 points for one dollar. but you can buy only in increments of 5 dollars. looks like MSFT is trying to increase calculator sales. god knows why!

    5. their own playforsure is not supported

    6. they make this future gadget which is not compatible with their OS of the century (vista).

    if you search for reasons for ipods success, first and foremost thing is its simple to use and it works! microsft tried to copy ipod and finally came up with this incredibly complex incredibly useless functionalities!

    someone rightly said microsft innovates at places where it shouldnt. if they had just copied ipod and put their market force behind it, it would have been better.

    I dont know how nuclear reactor works but any college grad can tell zune is an utter bullshit product.

  60. "Flaccid" Revisited ... by jabberwock · · Score: 1

    Is there a worse word to have associated with the release of a new technology product?

    No, I didn't think so. Might as well just say the device causes prostate cancer, and be done with it.

  61. Re:Hurrah! Apple's near-monopoly is secure! by NovaSupreme · · Score: 0

    Agreed, apple's monopoly will give sleek products.

  62. Well, at least... by Ringthane · · Score: 2, Funny

    it'll be a big hit on Woot!

    --
    Friends help you move... Real friends help you move bodies...
  63. Re:Hurrah! Apple's near-monopoly is secure! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    remind me ... which antitrust laws on both sides of the atlantic did apple break to build their monopoly?

  64. Mod Parent Up by Parallax+Blue · · Score: 1

    Why is this comment moderated troll? This is an interesting and insightful reply TO a troll, it isn't a troll itself. Remember, a troll usually makes a generalized, simple-minded, and inflammatory remark to start a heated argument.. this post doesn't do that at all. On the contrary, it makes some very good points.

    For shame, Slashdot.

  65. Re:Hurrah! Apple's near-monopoly is secure! by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I must have missed all the articles where Steve Jobs attempted to subvert the creation and marketing of Zune and other competing iPod products in order to maintain the near-monopoly and crush the competition. As far as I know, iPod is successful based off it's own merits, and the dancing silhouettes.

    --
    Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
  66. Re:Hurrah! Apple's near-monopoly is secure! by scribblej · · Score: 1

    Ha-ha.

    I don't personally have any strong feelings about Apple one way or the other -- I've never used an Apple product so I can't say anything about them.

    But it's important for you to remember, *there is nothing wrong with having a monopoly*.

    It's abusing that monopoly's power that is illegal. Having a monopoly is OK and legal.

  67. Can't trust amazon.com reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't trust amazon.com reviews. You do not know if the reviewers had any vested interest in the product to give it a good review. I have seen this with a grad student praising his professor's book. The grad student then formed a startup and hired his professor as CTO.

  68. Re:Hurrah! Apple's near-monopoly is secure! by silverdr · · Score: 1

    Might it be because Apple earned their near-monopoly with the quality of the product while Microsoft did it with the quality of their subethical marketing strategies?

    --
    Now, mod me down freely. My karma can't get any worse...
  69. Did you miss the title? by umdstu · · Score: 1

    Why is no one making jokes about the title "Flaccid" sales? Look it up, definitely wrong word to use!

    1. Re:Did you miss the title? by schtum · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's not wrong at all. They're pointing out Microsoft's failure to rise to the occasion in the face of stiff competition.

    2. Re:Did you miss the title? by umdstu · · Score: 1

      I guess. Hopefully the Zunes are upgradeable, they will need ED chips if they want to see any action...

    3. Re:Did you miss the title? by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2, Funny

      We can get a littler closer to Carlin with this one:
      Redomond's flaccid sales have thus far failed to prick a hole in the stiff market-share erected by those Cupertino pricks.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    4. Re:Did you miss the title? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:Did you miss the title? by resprung · · Score: 1

      They need to penetrate and perform :-)

      --
      Now is the winter of our disco tent
  70. But MS is prepared to pump millions into it? by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

    What I don't understand, is what exactly they would pump millions into?
    The marketing? R&D?
    A little too late for either of these if the product establishes itself as "worthless".
    If noone is buying it, what exactly can MS pump money into? Services that nobody is using? Overstocking the stores with something nobody is buying?
    What kind of long-term strategy is that? Develop a crappy product that even the reviewers hate then pour money down the drain?

    I saw one of them at the local Wally world. The pictures on the display case were all sideways, since the models were set up upright. What kind of display genius at MS thought that would be a good way to show it off?

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  71. But why? by paniq · · Score: 1

    I cannot understand why people ditch this fabulous product! After all, it was made from the same company which brought us the securest and most stable operating system of all times!

    --
    Do not trust this signature.
  72. The article is actually quite positive... by BRUTICUS · · Score: 1

    I think the sales are pretty good actually. In an MP3 player saturated market. To jump so far ahead of so many competitors is actually quite a feat. If anyone thought it would suddenly outsell Ipod on opening day they were thinking far differently from what I believe Microsoft's expectations were of the product.

    Zune is making its mark right now as a considerable competitor. Many more will sell over the new year.

    Microsoft has already taken a large chunk of Apple's customers.

    1. Re:The article is actually quite positive... by El+Gruga · · Score: 1

      You 'think' the sales are pretty good? WTF? thats just silly - of course it sold a few to M$ employees and general weirdos, but after 4 days its dropping like a stone. People dont like it, and they couldnt give a rats ass that its Microsh*t - they want an ipod - thats what they ask for. This 'war' was won TWO years ago by Apple. Many people report seeing Zunes not selling - there are many other options as well as ipods and there are lots of other places to get music, as well as iTunes. 'zune'? its crap and thats final. Sandisk outsold it, Creative zen outsold it.....its history already. iPod is a 100 million seller by january 07 - thats a win - theres no way back for anyone unless they come up with another NEW way to listen to music.

  73. I think they shold blame Balmer by DarkOx · · Score: 1

    Squirt! Come one why did he use the word "Squirt". Of all the stupid ways to describe the wireles features of his product. What could be more off putting.

    News flash Steve this country has gotten pretty darn liberal in the social sense compared to where it was say 20, 30, and espically 50 years ago but the average American still wants little or nothing to do with squirting anything, save maybe a water pistol and even then only children, on or at anyone else in (at least in public) much less haveing it done to them. The connotations are just bad. When we think of squirting Steve most of us imagine embassasing missadventures with a mustard packet at lunch not something sexy; even if we did think sex its not in a sexy way.

    Really would it have been so hard to say "beam", "zap", "shoot", "send", or "pass". All of us understand concepts of exchanging media in terms of sending as in mail, beam as in Star Trek transporter(even non geeks know that one), shoot as in t-shirt cannon, pass and in hand off object; there was no need to use the word "squirt". I don't have a marketing background but I could have told you describing the sharing features in terms of "squriting" was about the most off putting way talking about it possible.

      Now where can I find an pretty girl to rope with the end a 2' headset wire as another man named Steve with equally severe, though less discusting, reality distortion issues suggested.

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  74. So..... are you saying? by hcob$ · · Score: 0, Redundant

    that the Zune.... just can't get it('s sales) up?

    --
    Cliff Claven
    K.E.G. Party Chairman
    Founding Leader of: Koncerned for Egalitarin Governance
  75. Re:More proof there's more to the iPod than market by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1
    The scroll wheel introduced with the first iPod minis soon appeared on the complete iPod line when everyone including Apple realized it is what seperates it from all the other mp3 player interfaces.

    The scroll wheel already separated the iPod from the other MP3 players. The clickwheel from the Mini is what carried over to the rest of the iPod line.
  76. Well... by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    Maybe next time Microsoft will try harder by using a grammatically correct slogan as opposed to "welcome to the social".

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:Well... by dabraun · · Score: 1
      Maybe next time Microsoft will try harder by using a grammatically correct slogan as opposed to "welcome to the social".


      What exactly is gramatically incorrect about the sentence "Welcome to the social"?

      Social can be used as a noun. Grab a dictionary if you don't believe me.
  77. Not surprising to me by BrianRagle · · Score: 1

    I have tried my best since first hearing of the Zune to think of it in a non-partisan (Apple v. Microsoft) perspective. However, after seeing one for myself, reading multiple reviews which are both glowing and disparaging, and hearing reactions from other users, my initial suspicions are confirmed. Quite frankly, if I ever had need or desire of the alleged functionality of the Zune, I would have simply bought a Palm LifeDrive instead. As it is, my 4 gig iPod and Tungsten E2 perform admirably for any and every need I could conceive. The only remarkable aspect of the Zune is the WiFi interface which is disappointingly dedicated to limited file sharing with other Zune users. If such a capability were expanded to include any device able to receive or send a file, I could see the point of it. However, it reminds me far too much of some of those early WiFi game devices which let one play against other users in their immediate area. I bought one as a teenager and was frustrated that it seemed I was the only owner wherever I went. I can only imagine how disappointing it would be to drop so much cash for a prettified MP3 player only to find myself alone in the coffeeshop.

    In truth, I believe the poor initial showing of the Zune has far more to do with a waning influence of Microsoft than any serious issue with the device itself. Many Windows users I have spoken to are very wary of the upcoming Vista release and more than a little tired of continual security issues being exposed. PlayStation 3 appears to be a killer machine and far ahead of anything the Xbox line is capable of, at the present time. The last two years may very well be looked back on someday as the beginning of the final decline of Microsoft.

  78. Interesting discussion ... by Augusto · · Score: 1

    Which has nothing to do with the Zune of course.

    --

    - sigs are for wimps.
    1. Re:Interesting discussion ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Other than the first sentence in the intro, which reads: "As 'Black Friday' approaches and consumers line up for the Playstation 3 it looks like Zune has become an afterthought."

  79. Just the first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is normal for Microsoft. The first release of a new product never does well. Windows 1 was terrible.

    And the 17th release is also terrible, but sells well.

    The difference here is that Windows 1.0 wasn't fighting an entrenched monopoly, and Excel, IE, and others fere fighting an entrenched monopoly that decided to go to sleep for a few years.

    The biggest competitor in the early 1980's was the Apple II, which Apple graciously pulled the plug on to shift everybody to the Mac -- which at the time was far more expensive, and completely incompatible. Lotus made numerous mistakes with 1-2-3. Netscape decided to mostly rewrite Navigator and so had no releases for a few years.

    Unless you think Apple is going to just stop developing the iPod, it's hard to imagine how Microsoft will make serious in-roads with this. They're not even a hardware company: Dell is, and they tried a portable music player, and it failed miserably.

    Can you name a product (and not a Windows library like DirectX) that Microsoft developed in the presence of an established, competent monopoly (as Apple is with the iPod), and which succeeded?

  80. Zune sucks, coz... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. coz, the image of Microsoft is like the image of a boring, dirty old man.
    Yukkk

  81. Five years too late? by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

    I remember burning an MP3 to a CD in around 1997 or 1998. This was on an Amiga too. You have to ask yourself under which rock Microsoft have been hiding.

    They've repeated the same mistake as Sony, not taking interest in mp3 and instead concentrating on their own format (wma, for Sony it was ATRAC).

  82. Re:Hurrah! Apple's near-monopoly is secure! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple got theirs in much the same way as Microsoft.

    They were among the first.

    They spent a lot of money on PR and advertising.

    They bullied a lot of other people around to get on top.

  83. Re:Hurrah! Apple's near-monopoly is secure! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I must have missed all the articles where Steve Jobs attempted to subvert the creation and marketing of Zune and other competing iPod products in order to maintain the near-monopoly and crush the competition.
    Nope. You just accepted all the complaints of all the sore losers/pussies that lost when trying to compete with Microsoft. Not everything the government decides is correct. I'm sure you supported Apple when French lawmakers tried to loosen-up Apple's DRM (FairPlay) to enable iTunes Store music to play on competing audio players.
  84. Commodore Gravel is sooo much better by ancient_kings · · Score: 1

    Leave it those Germans to think of a much better way of building gadgets. The Gravel has the controls BEHIND the screen allowing for a smaller footprint than anything Apple or Microsoft has. I don't know why nobody has thought about doing this in the first place.... http://uk.gizmodo.com/2006/09/01/commodore_gravel_ in_pocket_por.html

  85. Wireless not a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, all you anti-MS wise guys who said the wireless would drain the batteries too quickly, well, I guess that won't be happening, since there's nobody else to talk to. Didn't think of that, now did ya? But of course no one will admit they were wrong.

  86. Brown Zune out of the ring by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 1

    At time of writing, the brown Zune is at number 79 in the Amazon top 100 (black Zune is down to number 21).
    I don't expect the brown zune to still be in the top 100 after the weekend.

  87. How 'bout Ars Technica reviews? by MojoStan · · Score: 3, Informative
    You can't trust amazon.com reviews.
    I mostly agree with you on trusting "customer reviews" from online stores, especially if they accept "reviews" from customers who haven't bought the item being reviewed. These Zune "reviews" could turn into a flame war against Apple fans who haven't actually tried the Zune and others trying to counter the effects from fake reviews. See CNET user reviews for a really obnoxious example of this.

    However, Ars Technica (an Apple-friendly, but fair site, IMO) gave a pretty positive review for the Zune (7 out of 10), even though they pointed out the early flaws of this product. If you're not familiar with Ars Technica reviews, they are the ones that published some rather infamous iPod reviews where they tested durability by putting an iPod in a washing machine, running it over with a car, and dropping it from a third-story balcony onto concrete (covered on Slashdot). BTW, they gave the newest iPod Shuffle 7/10 and the 2nd generation Nano got 8/10.

    --
    TO START
    PRESS ANY KEY

    Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

    1. Re:How 'bout Ars Technica reviews? by bestinshow · · Score: 1

      The Ars review pointed out that the device didn't work.

      That's right. It doesn't work. Syncing music failed to complete. Every time.

      How is that worth 7/10? Failure to perform its core function is the most important factor in any consumer electronics device, and the Zune failed. Maybe it is limited to a few systems/players, and Ars just happened to be using one of those. It didn't help that they compared it against a 60GB iPod, rather than the direct competitor, the 30GB iPod (which is thinner and lighter).

      You can't give a score based on potential, IF it worked correctly. Otherwise Ars' initial review of Aperture would have had a score greater than 4/10.

      The issues raised by comments to Ars' article have prompted Ars to create a scoring guidelines system for future articles. Hopefully 'failure to operate primary function reliably' will mean a low score (i.e., 5/10). The Zune also lacked the functionality of the iPod in many areas, e.g., games and other non-music features, but these are secondary (or tertiary!) and should be seen as 'other nice things'.

      Once Microsoft update the Zune firmware and the client software so that primary functions operate correctly, then the review can be reassessed and rescored based upon the other factors, such as ease of use, appearance, etc. It does look like the Zune's user interface isn't half bad from all the reviews I've seen, so that will be a major plus once the problems are ironed out. Appearance is subjective, and shouldn't factor highly into any product review's final score.

      Zune v2.0 or v3.0 will fix all the issues I'm sure, this is typical Microsoft.

      Hopefully the end result will be to kick Apple into being a bit more innovative with the iPod. We'll see if a widescreen iPod touchscreen will appear soon enough though. And that could prove to be a massacre - a 4" screen vs. a 3" screen is far more appealing than a 3" screen vs. a 2.5" screen.

  88. John McCain knows what a zuni is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We'll see if Redmond's new gadget doesn't have the checkered history of that old piece of ordnance:
    http://www.ordnance.org/mishaps.htm
    anyone who's ever seen the flick "Trial by Fire" about the USS Forrestal disaster might not know that now Senator McCain's aircraft was on the receiving end of the zuni that started it all:
    http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is _1999_Sept_27/ai_55820860
    Naming products can be tricky, no?

  89. Re:Hurrah! Apple's near-monopoly is secure! by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1
    As far as I know, iPod is successful based off it's own merits, and the dancing silhouettes.


    You forgot the part where people are locked into iPod/iTunes/iTMS because of DRM-encumbered tracks which are only Apple compatible.

  90. Black still beaten by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Black Zune is currently being beaten by seven different iPods.

  91. #22 now... by Burning+Plastic · · Score: 1

    And only 7 ipods above it (including 5 top 10 and #1)...

    Larger than an ipod, wireless. Lame... ;->

    --
    [All Your Fish Are Belong To Us]
  92. Exactly by Augusto · · Score: 1

    The article was comparing the PS3 and the Zune's demand, not the XBOX 360.

    --

    - sigs are for wimps.
  93. Re:Hurrah! Apple's near-monopoly is secure! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One simple example that the Apple zealots always seem to "miss": Go try to buy a car that comes with an MP3 stereo option that ISN'T based on a proprietary Apple iPod connector, then get back to me. Apple have a de-facto monopoly on mp3 players and use that monopoly to disrupt the ability of competitors to do business. This is the very definition of abuse of monopoly status and Microsoft was crucified for just this kind of action. It is well past time for Apple to adhere to the same rules that every other company has to.

  94. Yawn... by Mistah+Blue · · Score: 1

    Who cares about Zune? I have an iPod. Give it up Microsoft, you've lost me. My iPod caused me to ditch my personal PC and get a PowerBook.

  95. What's a Zune? by popo · · Score: 1

    No really -- what the hell is a "Zune"?

    I can understand "iPod": A pod refers to something small and seedlike, but it also references a 2001 (the film) style space capsule. The brand is a mix of modernity and capacity. The prefix "i" is common parlance for anything 'interactive'.

    Now what the hell is a "Zune"? It sounds sort of African and primitive. It sort of sounds like "Dune", which adds to the desert reference. Or maybe "Rune" which also sounds primitive. If its supposed to sound like "Tune", then that's somewhere between funny and sad.

    What's the software component of the "iPod"? Well, its "iTunes" of course. A name which needs no explanation.

    What's the software component of the "Zune"? Is it "Windows Media Player"? (Another horribly branded product). No. That would have made home integration too easy. Actually the brand team came up with "Zune Software". I can see the "Yeah. I like that. I think it really works" conversation now.

    I haven't played with a Zune, or even seen one so I can't comment on whether or not its any good. But I can comment on it from a brand perspective because I (like everyone here) has been inundated by the ads. And IMHO the brand is a dot-com style disaster in the making. It says nothing to me.

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
    1. Re:What's a Zune? by dabraun · · Score: 1

      What's a 'Google'? What does 'Amazon' have to do with books? Do you think most eBay users get the reference (if it even is a reference) to "The Bay" company (few outside of Canada have likely heard of it).

      The best names often have little to do with describing the product or company - which is not to say that a unique name guarantees success of course, but Zune is the opposite approach to names like "Windows Media Player" - complaining about both approaches (creative vs. descriptive) doesn't make a lot of sense.

    2. Re:What's a Zune? by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      A googol is 10 to the 100. A really big number.
      And Zune is ridiculously stupid because in Quebec and Israel it has a sexual meaning.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    3. Re:What's a Zune? by popo · · Score: 1


      Actually --

      A Google is a number with 100 zeroes -- implying a vast array of results.

      Amazon is something really big and really dense -- implying a rich, vibrant resource.

      eBay was conceived to sound like an African word -- back in the day of the "global village" Internet image. It also sounds like a "Bay" which is something safe and encompassing.

      --
      ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
  96. Re:Hurrah! Apple's near-monopoly is secure! by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

    "You forgot the part where people are locked into iPod/iTunes/iTMS because of DRM-encumbered tracks which are only Apple compatible"

    You mean for
    1. All 21 songs the average iPod user has bought from iTunes
    2. which can easily be turned into regular MP3's by burning them to a CD and reripping
    3. and which can be redownloaded anyway using the subscription services that every other DAP maker is hawking?

  97. Re:Hurrah! Apple's near-monopoly is secure! by yoasif · · Score: 1

    A. Competing companies are free to develop a "standard" way to connect to "remote control" devices (which is what the car basically is in this instance.

    B. Are you choosing to simply ignore the other (obvious) choice that car manufacturers have?

    Hint: It's 3.5mm in length.

  98. So Microsoft makes out like a bandit... by bgspence · · Score: 1

    Simple(ton) Economics:

    Lets say they lose $50 per Zune, then the less they sell, the more they don't lose.

  99. Only 1/3rd by pyrbrand · · Score: 1

    Disclosure: I work at Microsoft although I am in no way affiliated with the Zune team I think it's worth noting that it was the black Zune that reached #8 on Amazon's sales charts. The combined sales of black, brown and white Zunes would likely have peaked higher. Of course, the combined sales of all iPods would have surpassed that again, but the only difference between the Zunes is color so I'm not sure it makes sense to rank them separately (maybe the iPods are separated as well). I actually picked up a brown Zune earlier this week and really like it. One thing the pictures don't do justice for is the translucent colored casing which gives the edges a strange glowy highlight - green for brown, blue for black. The black actually looks pretty and the brown hip. White is for your mother -eh. As a music player, I can say it's really second to none except for the large size which I can see as a problem for those with tight jeans. The subscription aspect really knocks it out of the ballpark compared to an iPod for those of us who like to pay for our music. Incidentally the subscription also makes the sharing feature worthwhile - if someone shares a song I like I don't have to give it up in 3 plays, I can just sync the Zune and get a permanent copy from the online store. Granted, Redmond is probably one of the only places you're likely to have an opportunity to use the sharing feature, but hey, that's where I am. As a video player, having the giant screen is great, except for the fact that there's nothing to play on it since there's no video store and no legal way to rip DVDs (thanks DMCA!). Hopefully that will be remedied soon in an update.

  100. Because of SlashDot, I bought one ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Items Ordered Price
        1 of: Zune 30 GB Digital Media Player (Black) [Electronics] $249.99

    Sold by: Amazon.com
    - 1 item(s) Gift options: None

      Item(s) Subtotal: $249.99
    Shipping & Handling: $11.47
        -----
    Total Before Tax: $261.46
        -----
    Total for this Shipment: $261.46

  101. From the mouths of babes... by Hazrek · · Score: 1

    I was at WalMart today walking through the electronics section, and I stopped, as usual to look at the mp3 players. My 9 year old son saw the Zune sitting off to the side, and said "wow, that's ugly dad!" My 4 year old son promptly poitned at it and said "haha! stupid!"

    Nuff said.

  102. Too late! by Nickly · · Score: 1

    Microsoft's problem is that they came too late to the game, and then targeted the wrong market. If they wanted to produce a high-end competitor to the iPOD, they needed to do it two years ago. The iPOD is now THE high-end MP3 player because it had the market to itself. All the people who would have bought the Zune two years ago (Apple haters like me) have already given in to the iPOD. I resisted until May.

  103. Secret of iPod success by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's clear Microsoft has no idea what make the iPod so successful. If they did, it would be called the zUne.

  104. Re:Hurrah! Apple's near-monopoly is secure! by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

    Quick check in iTunes:
    6080 songs from the CD collection, including
    132 iTMS DRM'd songs and videos

    That's a bit over 2% of the total music I'd have to transcode (via CD burning) if I went to another music player. Not even worth factoring into a decision.

    This sort of ratio is common to everyone I know who buys from the iTMS (actually, I'm above average for this group). The vast majority of the music out there comes from CDs, and that's the way we like it.

    But hey! Facts shouldn't stop DRM jerking your knee about. Go for it! Apple lock-in! Oooh! Scary! Bad!

  105. FM tuner on the ipod by Mia'cova · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is the remote/fm tuner add-on. You get a little remote to pause/play, tinker with volume, etc. It comes with some a new set of 1st gen headphones with a shorter cord (makes sense with the remote). A radio option shows up in your menu when it's connected where you can set your presets and such. My headphones wires were getting loose from all the abuse and needed replacing so I grabbed this. So I've got the FM for the gym and a remote for easy access while snowboarding. I tried it out today for my first day on the hill and it did well enough as a remote. Down side is it's $50 which is steep but really, who cares about $50 these days :)

    Just sayin the nano and video ipods do have FM. It's just sold as an add-on.

    1. Re:FM tuner on the ipod by jridley · · Score: 1

      Yes, you can buy an FM tuner that uses the iPod as a battery and control panel. It costs more than most standalone FM radios and doesn't sound any better, and the two together are bigger than a standalone, as well.

      It is pretty tiny compared to a standalone with battery and display, but it's kind of silly since I have a $20 MP3 players with FM radios in them that are very tiny, smaller volume than the nano (a Sandisk 512M). Seems like Apple would have put the FM tuner in by now. I see so many people saying they bought something other than an iPod so they could have a radio too.

      You'd think Apple would know, if anyone, that people don't like a bunch of addons and extra cables.

  106. Terrible! by hackshack · · Score: 1

    Stopped by Target today to pick up a new iron (the previous one had shat wax (!) all over some pants I was ironing) and saw the Zune display. Now I've heard it was a rebadged Toshiba. I don't know much about Toshiba MP3 players save that I've never seen one in the wild. Now I know why. The physical interface, such as it is, is the same me-too cheap D-pad we've all seen on the Nomad et al. but this one's round, so it looks like a scroll wheel, except, heh, it doesn't scroll. Footprint the same as an iPod, but it's about as thick as yo momma's purse, and the same brown color too! The menu does a glitzy SNES-era pixelly thing when you choose options, presumably to make up for the lack of feedback by the, heh, missing scroll wheel. (Sensing a trend here?) It's hard as hell to choose a song; they're all multi-line and of course, no precision scrolling, because...

    It's definitely more glitzy than the iPod, or pretty much anything save the Archos, in that very obvious Microsoft "bright blue XP theme" way. So... I guess if you're the type with a leopard print cell phone cover and non-DOT-legal "blue" headlamps on your riced-out CRX, then, yeah! Go the hell for it! As someone who drives 500 miles a week in the city, there is no way I'm going to use this in my car. It's not half as usable as the iPod.

  107. What about the other zune? by the_arrow · · Score: 1

    I wonder how long it will take before the AROS developers gets a lawsuit for trademark infringement. The GUI toolkit they are using is also called zune.
    Allthough the zune in AROS has been in existance for quite a few years now, maybe AROS should sue MS instead?

    --
    / The Arrow
    "How lovely you are. So lovely in my straightjacket..." - Nny
  108. Youtube: Why nobody wants DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  109. Re:Hurrah! Apple's near-monopoly is secure! by martinX · · Score: 1

    No, it's abuse of monopoly if Apple told the car manufacturers that they will use the iPod interface and only the iPod interface, otherwise they can't use the iPod interface at all.

    If company A has a monopoly on something and colludes with or threatens company B with dire consequences should they not do what they say, that is anticompetitive - the are not competing with competitors on the strength of the quality of their product. If company B decides to use company A's product (even to the exclusion of others) then that's their call.

    MS was crucified (line on the left, one cross each...) because:
    In contrast to other operating system vendors, Microsoft both refused to license its operating system without a browser and imposed restrictions -- at first contractual and later technical -- on OEMs' and end users' ability to remove its browser from its operating system. As its internal contemporaneous documents and licensing practices reveal, Microsoft decided to bind Internet Explorer to Windows in order to prevent Navigator from weakening the applications barrier to entry, rather than for any pro-competitive purpose.
    http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f3800/msjudgex.htm

    MS used it's dominance in one area (OS) as leverage to threaten OEMs about another area (browsers). Being a monopoly isn't against the law. Abusing the power that goes with it is.

    --
    When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  110. Re:More proof there's more to the iPod than market by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 0, Troll

    This is true. I had seen survey results that showed that "coolness" was like fifth place in the list of reasons that people bought an iPod. But marketing is still important. The only marketing I have seen for direct competitors (i.e. non-phones) was one billboard for a Creative Zen. That's it. Otherwise, the most that most people that knew that there were competitors was at the store.

    Survey story & chart:
    http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2005/11/emw3053 91.htm
    http://www.emediawire.com/prfiles/2005/11/01/30539 1/chart19.gif

  111. So where's the teardown? by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    Has anyone got anything useful running on one of these yet? The screen is quite nice.

  112. Re:Hurrah! Apple's near-monopoly is secure! by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

    Microsoft gave OEMs benefits to not include browsers not named Internet Explorer. If that's not anticompetitive tactics, what is?

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  113. Down to 31 and 95 by Hebetsubeach · · Score: 1

    Instead of sales building, the black Zune is now down to #31 and the brown Zune #97 on Amazon's most popular electronic items list. There are nine versions of iPods in positions 1 to 30. I wonder if there will be any Zune in the top 100 within a few days. At one time the black Zune was in position 8 according to an earlier posting.

    1. Re:Down to 31 and 95 by El+Gruga · · Score: 1

      Zune is down to 43 on Amazon - dont know about the brown one...

  114. teh quote by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1

    Robert Scoble - ScobleShow
    What's the resolution on the screen?

    Matt Jubelirer - Microsoft
    It's 320/240.

    Robert Scoble - ScobleShow
    I believe higher than that?

    Matt Jubelirer - Microsoft
    Got to double check on the exact spec for you I will get back to you on that but you do get crystal clear video quality on the full screen...

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
  115. Zune cannot fail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or rather, it will not be allowed to. Microsoft will drop millions of dollars into this product just like it did with Xbox. Releasing a product is now part of the R&D stage. They have no intention of making a profit off Zune generation one. Microsoft's new strategy is:

    Release piece of shit copy of product. Learn from that experience. Release new, refined piece of shit. Lather. Rinse. Repeat.

    Eventually they'll have a solid product, just as Xbox 360+Live is a solid product. Whether they can ever have a blockbuster product - well, I don't think they can. This kind of strategy can only follow a blockbuster product that another company created.

  116. Re:More proof there's more to the iPod than market by Raenex · · Score: 1
    The iTunes interface won over many converts from Winamp and Musicmatch Jukebox before they even owned an iPod. Simplicity and power won over again. The iTMS isn't the best selling store by accident.

    I hated the iTunes interface when I signed up for it. I was on a Windows box and the thing looked like a damn Mac app. I don't remember the exact details, but getting a list of songs I wanted it to play did not match my intuition, as it had when I had used Winamp (at least I think it was Winamp). The only reason I "chose" the iTunes music store was because at the time, they were pretty much the only choice for $1 a song.

    This was several years ago. I have since gone back to Linux. And guess what? iTunes does not work on Linux. From what I've heard, the iPod was innovative and has a great design, but please don't try to transfer that karma to iTunes.

  117. Re:More proof there's more to the iPod than market by theurge14 · · Score: 1

    Why not? What is it about the iTunes interface that you don't like?

  118. Re:More proof there's more to the iPod than market by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

    How is this a troll? I must have hit a nerve somewhere.