Slashdot Mirror


Where the PS3 Stands Now

Phil Harrison and 1up's Luke Smith had a chat about the current positioning of the PlayStation 3, and it makes for some interesting reading. A quietly confident Harrison discusses the future of game distribution online, their attitude towards competition in the console market, and clarifies a few things about the potential for PS3 price cuts. The previous discussion about price cuts was apparently a big misunderstanding. "PH: Well, do you know what [Takao Yuhara] said was, cost reduction, not price drop, and there's a big difference between cost reduction and price drop. So, that I believe is where the confusion came from. Obviously, we are investing our money in making PlayStation 3s cheaper to manufacture -- that's part of our business plan. 1UP: You're not going to pass the savings along? PH: When we can, when there are savings to pass along to the consumer, we would obviously choose to do that. That's the business model. 1UP: Wait? You guys are doing this to make money? Really? PH: That's videogame hardware 101."

293 comments

  1. The PS3 stands proudly by jdc180 · · Score: 4, Funny

    In the display cases of your local department stores.

    1. Re:The PS3 stands proudly by KingSkippus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's modded Funny? How about Depressingly True?

      I've been in a couple of retail stores north of Atlanta recently, and they had pallets of PS3's. I still haven't gotten a Wii yet, though, because no one seems to be able to keep them in stock, even though it's two months after they came out and they've produced like ten times as many. :-(

      It's pretty obvious to me which company has a right to be proud and which one should be doing some serous soul-searching.

    2. Re:The PS3 stands proudly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Sure about that? I can't find a PS3 anywhere in SF and have resigned myself to picking one up with one of the expensive bundles. It will be worth it to finally get to play Resistance, VF5, and Motorstorm.

      Wiis are everywhere I go these days. There was a stack at the local BestBuy that was gathering dust just a few days ago. I asked the manager and he said they had even more in back. Sales have fallen dramatically after the holidays apparently.

      Most funny, or sad, is the local Fry's still has remnants of the gigantic pile of 360s Microsoft dumped on stores last November. You can still see 360 Premium boxes sitting untouched at the bottom of the once gigantic pile. Have to wonder if it was really worth it for Microsoft to ship so many to try to meet their yearly sales targets. From the looks of it, Microsoft isn't going to be shipping very many new 360s to stores over the next few months.

    3. Re:The PS3 stands proudly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the display cases of your local department stores.


      Not according to Sony. Go read EGM this month for a good laugh.
    4. Re:The PS3 stands proudly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call shenanigans. If you really want one that badly i'll ship one of the many here for retail and you can send me a wii from one of those stacks.

    5. Re:The PS3 stands proudly by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0

      You must be smoking crack in San Francisco. It's a different story in the South Bay. Getting an XBox 360, no problem. Getting a PS3 (if the frozen console in the display case doesn't bother you), no problem. Getting an Wii, WTF?!

    6. Re:The PS3 stands proudly by Perseid · · Score: 1

      I don't know about a gigantic pile, but keep in mind that as a manufacturer of something you WANT there to be product sitting on a shelf. People can't buy it if it's not sitting on a shelf. What's happening with the Wii is bad and shows a big mistake on Nintendo's part. People want to give Nintendo money but Nintendo can't give them product, and many of them are no doubt buying 360s or PSPs instead. This is costing Nintendo possibly millions of dollars.

    7. Re:The PS3 stands proudly by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      Apart from R:FoM, what does the PS3 really have? Until better games come out, there isn't going to be an increase in demand at this point. It would be like the Wii having one good game, saaay Twilight Princess. Sales would be nowhere near where they are now. They'd still be higher than the PS3, but that's because it's less than half the price.

    8. Re:The PS3 stands proudly by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      Wiis are everywhere I go these days. There was a stack at the local BestBuy that was gathering dust just a few days ago. I asked the manager and he said they had even more in back. Sales have fallen dramatically after the holidays apparently.

      Care to mention where this Best Buy is? I'm sure a number of slashdotters would love to know so that they can hurry over and buy them.

    9. Re:The PS3 stands proudly by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      Sales have fallen dramatically after the holidays apparently.

      Key word there being apparently. Though I almost wish the sales would slow down so I could actually find one in stock without it being a giant bundle or geting raped on ebay.

    10. Re:The PS3 stands proudly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Are you sure it wasn't a bunch of PS3's arranged to spell "Wii"? It's easy to confuse the two.

    11. Re:The PS3 stands proudly by Lord_Ultimate · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is costing Nintendo possibly millions of dollars. How exactly is Sony making money by having their systems sit on shelves and not be sold? I don't think anyone is saying "Nintendo is such a stupid company for not having 18 millions Wiis available at once." I tend to hear things like "If I wanted a PS3, I would go buy one. But I don't want one, so I'll wait for a Wii."
      --
      -- I might be stupid, but you have to be good at something.
    12. Re:The PS3 stands proudly by Some_Llama · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "This is costing Nintendo possibly millions of dollars."

      I think the main problem is that Nintendo is having a hard time getting to their production facilities to find out what the problem is, you see they already have millions of dollars in profits that they are wading through.

      Surprisingly enough whenever a Wii is found on sale people immediately buy them.

      Manufacturers want their products to fly off the shelves, products on shelves mean depreciation of inventory at their manufacturing plants, this costs them money.

      Nobody at Sony is going "oh good, the stock we shipped to retailers is sitting idle, we are in a much better position than Nintendo who can't make their product fast enough".

      At least internally anyway, publicly i'm sure its a different story.

    13. Re:The PS3 stands proudly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are a couple at the Mountain View Target store, go ahead and pick them up. They've been there for a while.

    14. Re:The PS3 stands proudly by Perseid · · Score: 1

      Actually, I was referring to the poster's mention of a 'gigantic pile' of 360s. Just because items are on the shelf doesn't necessarily mean they aren't selling them. It might mean that, but it might also mean that product is moving and the stores have enough inventory to keep replacing them. That is the position you as a manufacturer want to be in, and that is clearly not the position Nintendo is in.

    15. Re:The PS3 stands proudly by Raistlin77 · · Score: 1

      Time for a reality check.

      Wii - 3.45 million+ sold worldwide Wikipedia
      PS3 - 1.3 million+ sold worldwide Wikipedia

      Frankly, I'd prefer my product selling like hotcakes, and Nintendo seems to be doing a good job of that. If I'm selling hotcakes at $1 each, and people are buying them faster than I make them, I'm happier than if I sell hotcakes for $2.40 and they wither away under heat lamps.

    16. Re:The PS3 stands proudly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, Target's website says all their stores within 15 miles or so of Mountain View have no Wiis in stock. I probably wouldn't waste your time going over there.

    17. Re:The PS3 stands proudly by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 1

      If you've got enough credit you can order a giant bundle from Walmart and once it ships, walk into your local Walmart and return the games you don't want. You'll only be out the shipping costs.

    18. Re:The PS3 stands proudly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for pointing me to Wikipedia. Now could you please cite a legitimate source instead of a bunch of articles made-up by fan boys?

    19. Re:The PS3 stands proudly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Actually, I was referring to the poster's mention of a 'gigantic pile' of 360s. Just because items are on the shelf doesn't necessarily mean they aren't selling them"

      Anyone who has been to a Frys over the last few months know exactly what the poster was referring to. Back in November every Frys got an absolutely gigantic order of Xbox 360 Premiums. Easily the largest shipment I have ever seen of a console. The Frys nearest me had a main gigantic stack near the Xbox section and then tens of loose 360s piled on the floor or on shelves like the people unpacking them didn't know what the hell to do with all of the boxes. To this day there are still 360s sitting scattered all over the place in the exact same position they were in from that enormous November shipment. I really can't believe Frys would have accepted so many systems greater than there was a demand for unless Microsoft is basically paying them to take them. Stores like BestBuy and others had similar shipments. If you do a rough estimate on the number of stores in the country and the size of the stacks Microsoft must have overshipped easily two to three million 360s so they could make the '10 million sold' claim a few months ago. The next quarters 360 shipment numbers are going to be brutal for Microsoft. I can't imagine that the one time PR gain is going to be worth all the game news sites all reporting the gigantic drop in 360 shipment numbers in the next month or two.

    20. Re:The PS3 stands proudly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh right, because everything on Wikipedia is "made-up by fan boys"...

    21. Re:The PS3 stands proudly by Schrade · · Score: 2, Informative

      Data from http://vgcharts.org/

      US
      X360: 5,470,000
      Wii: 1,810,000
      PS3: 1,160.000

      What's interesting to note there is that in the US, the PS3 and the Wii aren't really that far apart.

      Japan
      X360: 350,000
      Wii: 1,610,000
      PS3: 700,000

      In Japan there's almost a million more Wiis sold. Japan loves themselves some Nintendo. Of course they also love Tentacle Porn and soiled panty dispensers.

      Others
      X360: 3,220,000
      Wii: 1,290,000
      PS3: Not Available Yet

      It'll be interesting to see how the PS3 does in Europe/Australia/The UK. My guess is that it would match the US sales.

    22. Re:The PS3 stands proudly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah no kidding, every time this comes up on slashdot or digg I ask if anyone knows a location in my area (Vancouver, BC) that has them in stock, and all i get is SILENCE. I've been trying to buy one locally for MONTHS and there are simply none to be had.

    23. Re:The PS3 stands proudly by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

      Well having more games is always a given, but will Sony focus on good games or will they take the path of the PSP and focus on its other areas? Sony has really shown an arrogant side lately that is at times laughable and at others just sad.

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    24. Re:The PS3 stands proudly by webheaded · · Score: 1

      What's interesting to note there is that in the US, the PS3 and the Wii aren't really that far apart. You call 700 thousand more not that far apart? Where did you learn math? Alabama? :p The lead in Japan is 300 thousand more than that, but both leads are pretty big considering the total number of units sold. For launch at least, Nintendo pretty much showed Sony who its daddy was.
      --
      "Those who would sacrifice essential liberties for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - BenF
    25. Re:The PS3 stands proudly by Schrade · · Score: 1

      Yes, I do call it not that far apart because the media and blogs make it seem like it's selling leaps and bounds further than that in the US. I personally think sales for the PS3 will start to take off come March with the huge lineup of new titles coming out.

    26. Re:The PS3 stands proudly by mjhacker · · Score: 1

      I don't know about a gigantic pile, but keep in mind that as a manufacturer of something you WANT there to be product sitting on a shelf. People can't buy it if it's not sitting on a shelf. What's happening with the Wii is bad and shows a big mistake on Nintendo's part. People want to give Nintendo money but Nintendo can't give them product, and many of them are no doubt buying 360s or PSPs instead. This is costing Nintendo possibly millions of dollars. I call BS. Sony hasn't produced near as many PS3s as Nintendo has produced Wiis. So, the fact that even though Sony hasn't made that many consoles and they're sitting on the shelves means that demand isn't as high as it was anticipated. Nintendo is making tons of Wiis still and yet they keep selling out... that is probably more demand than they initially expected. Everyone who wants a Wii is waiting for a Wii.
    27. Re:The PS3 stands proudly by emilper · · Score: 1

      shouldn't you compare oranges with oranges ? PS3 is ... how many times more expensive and more capable than Wii ? The number of sold consoles does not say much ... I think it's more interesting to know how much money were spent to buy those consoles ... anyway, PS2 still dominates the sales, if I remember well.

    28. Re:The PS3 stands proudly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is 230% !

      Thats more than double the amount of PS3...

    29. Re:The PS3 stands proudly by louisadkins · · Score: 1

      I actually even went as far as to buy a Wii off auction, on EBay. When I added in the cost of the extra remote, remove the cost of tax, and added shipping, the total was within $20 of what it would cost me otherwise (though it did take a few days to find an auction that was not $50 higher) and so I decided it was worth it. So many people I know that will not even consider touching a PS3. Some due to price, some to tech, but most due to the reputation the company has created for itself... and the (lack of) fun games line-up.

    30. Re:The PS3 stands proudly by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Depressing for whom?

    31. Re:The PS3 stands proudly by Arctic+Dragon · · Score: 1

      I was at Wal-Mart and Best Buy last night, and both stores had 3 PS3s on the shelf. Funny how it wasn't long ago that people were paying 2 grand on eBay for these things.

    32. Re:The PS3 stands proudly by webheaded · · Score: 1

      Or how about we take a look at how much money the company selling the console makes. Either way, Sony isn't doing too well, is it? They lose money on all the hardware they sell AND they aren't selling as much as Nintendo. I don't doubt that they will start picking up as time goes on, but they are definitely not doing very well right now. I'm amazed that they managed to take something as insanely popular as the Playstation and fuck up the launch THAT badly.

      --
      "Those who would sacrifice essential liberties for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - BenF
    33. Re:The PS3 stands proudly by emilper · · Score: 1

      ... I don't know ... it will be available in a shop near me in a few weeks. I still have time to think if I am going to buy one, or wait some more until I'll be able to find highdef videos around here. Still, it's a pity that cute bunch of processors is not very useful for text processing since it does not involve much floating point math, otherwise I'd certainly be one proud owner of a PS3.

  2. make money? by brotherscrim · · Score: 5, Funny

    PH: That's videogame hardware 101."
    I guess Nintendo was the only one to actually pass that class.

    1. Re:make money? by brotherscrim · · Score: 4, Insightful
      You know, the Ps2, Xbox, Xbox 360, and (especially) the PS3 were/are being sold at a loss, for at least the first year or two the system was/is out. Only Nintendo refrains from such behavior, selling all of their hardware at a profit.

      So when Phil Harrison says that making money off of the sale of a console is "videogame hardware 101," It's obvious that there's only one game company with a passing grade in that class. But I guess saying so is "flamebait."

    2. Re:make money? by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      Just because they loose money at one point doesn't mean they wont make money in the long run. If they priced the PS3 at a point where they'd make a profit they'd be selling even fewer of them. Judging by the PS2's sales numbers (which IIRC they make about $40-$50 per unit these days). You're right that Nintendo passed the class but I'd say Sony passed that class as well.

      Microsoft on the other hand... AFAIK the 360 is currently selling at a small profit but the Xbox 1 never reached that point, which is why it was dropped so quickly; the games division on a whole has been deep in the red since it's inception. Even still, I suspect they'll come out on top eventually just on a much longer time scale.

    3. Re:make money? by apoc06 · · Score: 1

      the xbox360 is still not selling at a profit yet. they hope to bring the console into the black within the year though.

    4. Re:make money? by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 1

      Origionally Posted By twistedsymphony: Microsoft on the other hand... AFAIK the 360 is currently selling at a small profit but the Xbox 1 never reached that point, which is why it was dropped so quickly; the games division on a whole has been deep in the red since it's inception. Even still, I suspect they'll come out on top eventually just on a much longer time scale.

      But you need to remember MS's business model:
      1) Spend outrageous, insane amount of money to undercut all competition
      2) Become monopoly
      3) Raise prices
      4) Profit

      --
      We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
    5. Re:make money? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If they priced the PS3 at a point where they'd make a profit they'd be selling even fewer of them.

      To paraphrase another great strategist, "You don't enter a console war with the hardware you want. You enter a console war with the hardware you have."

      If Sony had lowered their sights a little when designing the PS3, there's no reason why they shouldn't have been able to create a profitable console that could sell for $400 or less. But no, they decided they NEEDED a Cell processor, and they NEEDED a Blu-Ray drive, and thus they ended up with a console that they can't even sellout at a loss.

    6. Re:make money? by Caffeinate · · Score: 1

      Not quite right . . .

      1) Spend outrageous, insane amount of money to undercut all competition
      2) Become monopoly
      3) Raise prices
      4) ???
      5) Profit!

      --
      Godless heathen.
    7. Re:make money? by nomadic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So when Phil Harrison says that making money off of the sale of a console is "videogame hardware 101," It's obvious that there's only one game company with a passing grade in that class. But I guess saying so is "flamebait."

      How is it flamebait? Bashing Sony's PS3 decisions gets you easy +moderation.

    8. Re:make money? by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      You know, the Ps2, Xbox, Xbox 360, and (especially) the PS3 were/are being sold at a loss, for at least the first year or two the system was/is out. Only Nintendo refrains from such behavior, selling all of their hardware at a profit.

      So when Phil Harrison says that making money off of the sale of a console is "videogame hardware 101," It's obvious that there's only one game company with a passing grade in that class. But I guess saying so is "flamebait."

      I wouldn't worry, you're back up as "funny" now (though that won't help your karma); I think this thread has had a Sony Fanboi moderator go through it, AnonymousSonyFanboiTroll got an "interesting" upmod.

      To address your point, you're spot on, but to sell at a profit, Sony would have to sell the PS3 at around $1000, here in the UK they will be selling at around £425 (~$800) and that's still a loss as I understand it. The system is selling badly as it is, how much worse do you think it'd be seling at $1000? To be blunt, they have no choice execpt to sell at a loss if they want to sell an uber HD Blu-ray gaming machine of death. Nintendo understands this point, and says "we're not going there" If Sony had decided not to take the Blue-ray route, they may have managed to sell at a profit some day; as it stands I doubt that the PS3 will ever sell at a profit.
      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    9. Re:make money? by 7Prime · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's all about BluRay. They would never sell it without BluRay because their media division forced them to do so. Now, the Cell processor, on the other hand, was their own fault. Unneccessary, and from what I've heard, detrimental to getting developers onboard and getting content out the door quickly.

      But, unfortunately, Sony would never even begin to consider the possibility of creating a PS3 without BluRay. Honestly, in the minds of the big wigs, their game division could completely collapse, but it would all be worth it if BluRay became the new video media standard.

      This scares me, it's bad enough having Microsoft as a defacto standard in many areas of the computer industry, but having Sony in control of an entire generation of digital media scares the fuck out of me. I have no love for Toshiba, but at least they're not Sony.

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    10. Re:make money? by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      You're correct that they Xbox division hopes to be turning a profit by next year, but that doesn't mean they're still loosing money on each console sold. From what I've heard they're currently netting about $75 per premium unit sold. When the console launched they were estimated to have been loosing about $125 per unit, but have since been able to cut many of their manufacturing costs. I suspect that moving their chips to the 65nm process will further reduce costs.

      Basically the only reason they haven't dropped prices yet is because the console IS actually turning a profit and they have the choice between gaining more market share (by dropping) or fast tracking the division towards getting out of the red (by staying where they are and collecting the profits on the units they're selling). There's no real incentive to drop since the Wii really targets a different market and the PS3 isn't currently threating their price point.

    11. Re:make money? by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      selling all of their hardware at a profit

      Not true. There are numerous interviews with Miyamoto out there where he says that they of course do not make a profit on every console sold at every point of the whole life cycle, but that overall they do.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    12. Re:make money? by nickyj · · Score: 1

      Well I'm hoping for a Xbox360 price drop. I'm waiting for it. If Nintendo doesn't get online gaming going before the 360 drops in price, then I'm getting a 360 to sit next to my Wii for online games. I've only heard lots of good things from friends about Live. Wii is fun with company, but solo it's kinda dull after finishing Zelda. So the Wii will be my party console, and 360 my online console. I'd like to see wireless net and bigger HD space in the 360 also with that price drop.

      So I'm in the market for a 360, but until they drop that price... they don't have me yet.

      --
      Causing Chaos Everywhere,
      Nik J.
      The strange world of a loner, in a populous city, drowning in society
    13. Re:make money? by Trogre · · Score: 0, Troll

      Oh yes, I think I remember that class Nintendo went to:

      1) Make grossly underpowered game console
      2) Strap on a gimmicky controller, making sure the novelty wears off after 5 minutes
      3) Make sure there are no interesting games
      4) Start viral marketing campaign and plant fanboys on blogs sites
      5) Profit!!!

      Where I come from the PS3 isn't released yet, but it's still outselling the Wii (in pre-sales) by a considerable margin.

      Hell, the Wii isn't even trying to compete with the PS3. It's in more direct competition with the PS2, and it's losing everywhere. Badly.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    14. Re:make money? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Troll

      Yes, both Blu-Ray and Cell were horrible mistakes. But then, what do you expect? The PS2 succeeded because the marketing killed the Dreamcast dead before the PS2 even came out, not because it was actually a superior platform (although it definitely has more raw power available, actually utilizing it all is a damned big task.)

      Blu-Ray was of course added because the parent company said THOU SHALT PLAY BLU-RAY. It was obviously not because HD-DVD didn't hold enough content for games. The only reason any developer has filled up a Blu-Ray is that they wanted to say the game was huge. Given the low transfer rate of the first-generation Blu-Ray drive as compared to a whateverth-generation DVD drive, the data transfer rates are WORSE than a DVD, even the DVD-ROM in the original Xbox. So the only thing Sony really brought to gaming with Blu-Ray is longer load times.

      Cell was added because it's the most powerful thing going. But like the PS2, it makes programming insanely more complicated. It makes code less portable; the whole architecture of the game must be designed for cell (again, just like it had to be designed for the EE, only moreso) in order to get good performance. And it's horribly expensive. It looks as though Microsoft made a vastly better decision by going with three symmetric processors.

      In spite of all its many shortcomings, I think Sony has sufficient credibility among gamers and enough money to spend on marketing to keep the PS3 afloat - to the detriment of the gaming community. But it's not like they give a shit. I do not however believe that they will be able to pull this shit off for another generation, or skip the next generation like they obviously believe they will with a console that costs this much. I think Microsoft will push another generation of consoles, and Nintendo will be right there, and Sony will again be left holding their dick looking like some kind of reject from the brain-installation factory.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:make money? by twistedsymphony · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If I had to guess I'd say they're going to drop the price next holiday season, and that you'll probably see larger hard drives at about the same time.

      IMO striving for profitaiblity is also why they haven't released a larger hard drive yet... much of that $75 of profit comes from the fact that the 20GB HDD is outrageously overpriced at this point. releasing a larger HDD would either kill their profits on the Premium unit (if they included the larger HDD with it) or it would drive sales towards the CORE unit (which still sells at a small loss) with people buying the larger HDD separate. over pricing a larger HDD wouldn't be much of an option because to make it comparable to the 20GB in terms of $ per GB it would cost nearly as much as the console itself, which probably wouldn't go over very well.

      the move to 65nm will probably come with the first substantial redesign of the 360's internals which will cut costs of the unit that they could drop the price a clean $50-$100 and still turn profits on each unit sold. They'll start to roll those out any day now and probably enjoy some substantial profits until the holiday season where they'll drop the price, and roll out the bigger hard drives, they'll still be netting a profit on a per unit basis but next holiday is when they'll really need to concentrate on market share as the Wii will probably be easily available and the PS3 will have a better library. Halo 3 + Forza 2 + Mass Effect + Fable 2 + Price Drop + Larger Hard Drives will make quite the compelling knock out combo next holiday, it will definitely be difficult for the PS3 and Wii to compete with that.

      This of course is all just my personal speculation though.

    16. Re:make money? by zerocommazero · · Score: 1

      Ware, a troll lives 'ere.

    17. Re:make money? by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      Where I come from, the PS3 and Wii are both released, and the Wii is outselling the PS3 by a considerable margin.

      The Wii isn't outselling the PS2 here, because Nintendo is still not shipping enough Wiis to satisfy the demand for them. You can't find them in stock anywhere.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    18. Re:make money? by Trogre · · Score: 1

      That's kind of my point. The Wii isn't in the same market as the PS3. Technically it's still a 7th generation console but it's really competing with the PS2 for peoples money.

      For people who are prepared to spend more money and get a higher-specced console (of whom there are relatively few), the PS3 is the more appealing choice.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    19. Re:make money? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      "You don't enter a console war with the hardware you want. You enter a console war with the hardware you have."

      Exactly. Lowered expectations worked for me.

    20. Re:make money? by hobbesx · · Score: 1

      If Sony had lowered their sights a little when designing the PS3, there's no reason why they shouldn't have been able to create a profitable console that could sell for $400 or less. But no, they decided they NEEDED a Cell processor, and they NEEDED a Blu-Ray drive, and thus they ended up with a console that they can't even sellout at a loss.

      Another thing to consider too- Sony seems to expect a much longer life from their consoles. The PS2 is over six years old, and there's still games being developed for it.
      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
    21. Re:make money? by king-manic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Ps2 was only sold at a loss for the first run. According to all available info. The Xbox and 360 were sold at a loss up till even today. The Xbox has too many outsourced components. The part costs have not fallen for MS significantly while the selling price has. They have admitted it still sellls at a loss. Ditto with the 360. Sony has said the Ps2 has not sold at a loss for a long time.

      The Ps3 may be the same as the Ps2. Since the majority fo the initial costs is R&D and fab facilities. Their cost get lowered much faster then the Xbox and 360 because no one except them is making a buck off the manufacturing.. Well rambus but they exstort everyone.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    22. Re:make money? by Kazzahdrane · · Score: 1

      Not a fanboy at all, but I picked up a 360 a few weeks back (I work in a games store) and am loving it. Sadly I don't have much time to play it since my degree course just got really busy, but Xbox Live is far and away the most fun I've had online with a small group of people (I don't play WoW anymore, I chose social life). I've been a PC gamer all my life but MS have really crafted a fun experience and I love the way they've integrated it into the whole machine. Nintendo's online strategy has left me very disappointed so far, like yourself I love the Wii but since the good single-player games are basically Zelda and nothing else right now (at least here in eXiteTruck/Trauma Center/Elebits forsaken Europe), my Wii doesn't get much playtime unless I have friends round.

      Don't blame you for holding out for a price drop though, I'm sure it's coming pretty soon - we're expecting it around or just after the European PS3 launch at the end of March. There's also rumours of an improved version of the console with a bigger HDD, might be worth waiting for that if you think you'll need it (possibly HDMI too).

      The Sony fanboys who argue that the Playstation Network (which I have not even seen demo'd, so it might be great for all I really know) is superior to Live because it's free are about to get a big kick in the teeth - probably in a few months from what I've heard.

    23. Re:make money? by KeiichiMorisato · · Score: 1

      I'm not trying to be dick or anything, but any links or references would be great. As far as I know, it has been stated that Nintendo always makes a profit on every console sold from the beginning.

    24. Re:make money? by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      You're right that Nintendo passed the class but I'd say Sony passed that class as well.

      The problem with the Sony approach is that you take a BIG risk when you sell at a loss, hoping sales are strong enough to bring down costs. But if you have a flop, you are screwed.

    25. Re:make money? by dabraun · · Score: 1

      According to all available info. The Xbox and 360 were sold at a loss up till even today. The Xbox has too many outsourced components. The part costs have not fallen for MS significantly while the selling price has.


      The thing is, there *is* no available info on this, only speculation. It's widely accepted that the xbox sold at a loss for most or all of it's time on the market, and almost as widely accepted that the xbox 360 sold at a loss on launch day - but no one here actually *knows* this for a fact, and, honestly, there's little reason to think that the 360 couldn't be turning some small profit now, over a year after it's release, still selling at it's original price.

      Microsoft learned a whole lot from making the xbox hardware and I don't think they're dumb enough to make the same mistakes again (though they had new problems this time with the original runs of 360 hardware, that was corrected over a year ago.)
    26. Re:make money? by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I don't have the bookmarked the links, and a quick googling didn't turn them up. I know that this is always said, but it is just a persistent /. meme that is very obviously wrong. I don't think you even need a link to know, just think about it: they have x million yen development cost, and then they sell the first few thousand consoles on launch day for $250 each. Can every one of these sold in the very beginning make a profit? I don't think so.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    27. Re:make money? by LKM · · Score: 1

      I think what he actually said was that they sold the Cube at a loss for a small amount of time. They lowered the price just before releasing it, which may have put it into loss zone, but only for a few months. I'm not sure I remember correctly, though, it was a few years ago, I think.

    28. Re:make money? by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      I also read it about the Wii. Yeah, he said that there are phases were they sell below hardware cost (after launch, after price drop), but they make it up overall. Nevertheless, if you factor in R&D, it is even more obvious to state, without qualification, that "every piece is sold at a profit".

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    29. Re:make money? by donaldm · · Score: 1

      Any company that controls the manufacturing process (Sony) can eventually reduce the total cost of production of the product and benefit from this reduction in its entirety. If you have to buy from a manufacturer you need volume orders to cut down the cost and it is debatable that when the manufacturing costs are eventually reduced that the total reduction will be passed in its entirety to the company (Microsoft and Nintendo) who orders the product.

      Working out the cost of product is very difficult considering the chain of the production processes and unless the company is fully up-front with all over costs all the so called informed people are just guessing although you can make reasonable guesses concerning a company that orders it's product from other manufacturing companies.

      For a company like Sony the initial setup is the major cost but once you get your production line going the all up cost is not that much but getting this information which is normally "top secret" is very difficult so anyone for industrial espionage.

      A simple example: A fab plant for the cell chip is approx US$5M to US$10M but producing the chip would cost between US$10 and US$30 each so reducing from 90nm to 45nm would result in chips of a few dollars and when you look at volume quantities you are going to save 10's of millions a year on the production of that item.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    30. Re:make money? by DrXym · · Score: 1
      You have to understand why Nintendo needs a profit. Nintendo's ONLY products are a few games consoles. They have to make a profit because they have no other businesses to drive. Games help for sure, but I suspect the R&D for a new console is so vast that games don't cut it by themselves.

      The same is not true of Microsoft or Sony. Microsoft is using the 360 to push IPTV, Video on Demand, Vista, Zune. Sony is using the PS3 to push LCD TV, Blu-Ray, IPTV, Video on Demand & Walkman. Consoles are part of an overall strategy for these companies to get themselves into your home (before Apple, Tivo + rest of world). That's in addition to whatever they make off games. So both can afford to take a bigger hit up front because the console is a loss leader.

      In Sony's case the strategy mightn't look like it is working, but it is - Blu-Ray is the defacto winner (barring some monstrous screwup) of the HD format war and they've just become the biggest producer of LCD TVs. Now the PS3 isn't completely responsible for both bits of news but it gives a hefty shove to both. And they haven't even started with their download services yet.

    31. Re:make money? by toolie · · Score: 1

      For people who are prepared to spend more money and get a higher-specced console (of whom there are relatively few), the PS3 is the more appealing choice.

      I think there are a lot of people who are prepared to spend more money, if they feel what they are getting is worth it. Right now, the PS3 doesn't really offer anything that makes it worht purchasing. There is one game people like, and it plays Blu-Ray disks... thats it. If there were a bunch of good games and Blu-Ray was the definitive future for HD home content, then they would be selling more. Right now, they aren't even tapping the people prepared to pay more or who want a higher-specced console.

      --
      -- toolie
    32. Re:make money? by SethraLavode · · Score: 1

      Specifically, it was when the Gamecube price was lowered to $99 and before they phased out the component video connection. The digital output was one of the casualties in bringing the system back to being profitable.

    33. Re:make money? by default+luser · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Another thing to consider too- Sony seems to expect a much longer life from their consoles. The PS2 is over six years old, and there's still games being developed for it.

      That's not a characteristic you build into a console design - it just happens. If one console is a runaway success, it tends to last more than the 4-5 years of the stragglers.

      Atari VCS (2600): runaway success, so successful that it continued selling well after the more powerful Intellivision and Colecovision were released. Atari released the VCS in 1977, the 2600 Jr in 1986, and "oficially" discontinued the console in 1992.

      NES: took the post-crash market by storm, and had %90 of the US market by the end of the 80s. Games were still developed well into the early 90s, spurred by the release of the NES2. The console was released in 1983, and was "discontinued" in 1996.

      PSX, PS2: both runaway successes. The PSOne was only recently retired, and the PS2 has at least a couple years left in it.

      You don't build-in long lifetimes into a console, you can only make them happen through a combination of reasonable pricing, creative design, aggressive marketing and game libraries. This is why everyone is so keen to see which console will be the "first to X million sold," because critical mass attracts developers. Once you reach critical mass, you not only get more developers, you also have the potential for another runaway success.

      Of course, this console generation could end-up like the shootout between the SNES and the Genesis/Megadrive - no clear winner. If that's how things play out, don't expect ANY of these consoles to have a life of more than 5-6 years.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

  3. zzz...Is it under $100 yet?...zzz by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 2, Funny

    zzz...Is it under $100 yet? No? Wake me up in a couple years, then...zzz

    1. Re:zzz...Is it under $100 yet?...zzz by safiel · · Score: 1

      ha. you can't even get a PSP for under $100 yet... that thing is long over do for a price cut. With a price of $150 it would be a lot more attractive when compared to the ds. At least its starting to get a library of decent games though

    2. Re:zzz...Is it under $100 yet?...zzz by revlayle · · Score: 1

      and the PS2 still retails for $129

    3. Re:zzz...Is it under $100 yet?...zzz by Emetophobe · · Score: 1

      zzz...is the PS2 under $100 yet? No. And you expect the PS3 to be under $100? Keep dreaming...

  4. wow by flyingsquid · · Score: 3, Funny
    They're in this to make money?


    Damn, Sony sure had me fooled...

    1. Re:wow by fotbr · · Score: 1

      Well, they need some way to keep their movie division afloat, since piracy is so bad that hollywood can't make any money on their own.

    2. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even so, they're still doing better than MS in that regard.

  5. Problem with PS3 release was... by blahplusplus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... lack of killer system selling game or games. It has to be said if the games were there even the high price would not be such a barrier of there really was a killer app that made people throw their financial reason to the wind.

    1. Re:Problem with PS3 release was... by Raynor · · Score: 1

      How about Global Thermonuclear War?

      --
      "Dictator Flakes. They WILL be delicious."
    2. Re:Problem with PS3 release was... by un.sined · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's still the problem. I have both the PS3 and the Wii, and while the PS3 is the superior system, the Wii gets much more use. The price is right, and there are several games for it.

      The PS3 is definitely superior. The games that it has (that I've played) are all top notch. The problem is that there are so few games. Sure, there are some games that are downloadable via the Playstation Network, but most people won't know about those. Hell, I only found out that GT:HD was available by RTFA.

      I understand Sony's desire to get the PS3 out by Christmas. I think they would have had better luck if they'd waited until more games were ready.

    3. Re:Problem with PS3 release was... by eln · · Score: 1

      That was probably part of it, but the price was so much higher than any previous game system (that sold, anyway) that even a killer game might not have been enough. Most people complaining about the price were saying that it was too much money for ANY game system. Most people are still reluctant to drop that much money on a TV set, much less a game console.

      It is possible that enough games could come out to make it attractive to a large enough segment of the population even without a price drop, but I can't see it gaining any real mass market penetration until the price drops by around $200.

    4. Re:Problem with PS3 release was... by Mex · · Score: 1

      It wasn't just that.
      Let's see, off the top of my head:

      * 600 dollar price tag.
      * Launch of the Nintendo Wii at the same time
      * strong competition from the Xbox 360
      * Small allocation of units at launch

      Really, what game would inspire you to pay 600 dollars for a system? (Plus 50 or 60 for the game itself)?

      When the PS2 launched, I remember it had no games other than Ridge Racer, I believe. But back then, there was practically no competition from neither Nintendo or Sega(The dreamcast was struggling already).

    5. Re:Problem with PS3 release was... by Osty · · Score: 1

      ... lack of killer system selling game or games. It has to be said if the games were there even the high price would not be such a barrier of there really was a killer app that made people throw their financial reason to the wind.

      It's very rare to have a system-seller game at launch. Out of all of the various different console launches over the years, I can only think of two such cases -- the SNES launch with Super Mario World, and the Xbox launch with Halo.

      With that in mind, it must be possible to survive a launch without a system-selling game or there wouldn't be any consoles anymore. Sony kept the PS2 alive for the first year through excellent backwards compatibility, but they screwed that up on the PS3 due to the change in peripheral interface (because people want to play Guitar Hero and DDR). A system-seller will eventually come and people will buy the PS3, but they've got a huge task ahead of them -- a system-seller game for a $600 console needs to be substantially better than what it would take to sell a $100-200 or even a $400 console. At $600, the customer needs to be able to answer yes to the question, "Would I pay $660 to play X?" Resistance doesn't pass that test, nor does Madden or any game out yet. Gran Turismo might answer that question for some, as will MGS4 for others, but until there's a massive price drop I think Sony's going to find it much harder to get a true system-seller (even from franchises that are proven system-sellers in the past)

    6. Re:Problem with PS3 release was... by Mr.Dippy · · Score: 1

      I remember they had some pretty decent games. When I got my PS2 right after launch I bought SSX. I didn't even like snow boarding games until I played that.

      --


      -Dipster
    7. Re:Problem with PS3 release was... by DarkJC · · Score: 1

      At $600, the customer needs to be able to answer yes to the question, "Would I pay $660 to play X?"

      Honestly I think that's one of the worst things that everyone always brings up. "Resistance isn't worth $660! Motorstorm isn't worth $660! VF5 isn't worth $660!" and so on. Fact: You're not going to be buying only one game for any system. If there is only one game that appeals to you right now, and you don't deem it worth $660, then it's not a good time for you to purchase the system, I agree. But how about when there are 3 games you're interested in? How about 5 or 6? 10? Where do you draw the line. At some point you need to stop asking yourself whether one game is worth $660 and look at what you'll get from the system as a whole.

      Personally I picked one up just for Metal Gear Solid 4. But I enjoyed Resistance, I'm picking up VF5 on the 20th, and I'm definitely looking forward to Motorstorm. MGS4 was worth it for me, these great games are just icing on the cake.

    8. Re:Problem with PS3 release was... by 7Prime · · Score: 1

      It's very rare to have a system-seller game at launch. Out of all of the various different console launches over the years, I can only think of two such cases -- the SNES launch with Super Mario World, and the Xbox launch with Halo.

      Actually, I'd say that a good number of consoles have a system-seller at launch. Nintendo has always had one, except for the GameCube (Super Mario World, Mario 64, and now Zelda:TP), and Smash Bros. Melee was quick on the heals of the GCN launch, if you want to count that. The Genesis had Sonic, which is unquestionably a huge system seller, and as you mentioned, the XBox had Halo. Sony, on the other hand, has NEVER had a system seller at launch.

      So, I'd say it's pretty common to have a system seller at launch, Nintendo has always TRIED to, and they usually succeed, except with Luigi's Mansion, which was a dissaster (in terms of getting people to the stores). The advantage they have is that they have a very strong game software division that is entirely first party. Sony's game division is much weaker, and all Microsoft's top gaming divisions are practically second party (like Bungie and Rare), and the disconnect in infrastructure likely impedes a high level of communication between hardware and software divisions. Sega was the only other hardware manufacturer with a strong, connected, first party game division. In fact, it was so strong that they simply gutted their hardware division. Although neither the Saturn or the DreamCast saw system-sellers at launch.

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    9. Re:Problem with PS3 release was... by lhbtubajon · · Score: 1

      Just to clarify:

      The Genesis launched with Altered Beast as the pack-in, and no real good games beyond that. Sonic didn't come along until quite a bit later, like almost two years later.

      One good example you left off was the original NES, which launched with Super Mario Bros., perhaps the best launch game of all time.

    10. Re:Problem with PS3 release was... by jusdisgi · · Score: 1

      The PS2 lineup wasn't nearly as bad...a dozen or so titles IIRC. I got a launch unit, whichever Dead or Alive game that was (2? 3?), timesplitters (still in my opinion a great multiplayer shooter), and something else, but I'm not sure...maybe tekken tag? Anyway, I thought they were all great games. I didn't see a single title in the PS3 launch that I thought I would have bought under ordinary circumstances (that is, if I already owned the console and there was a large software library available).

      Anyway, I fully expect the library to bulk up, and the price to come down. No idea how long it'll take.

      --
      Given a choice between free speech and free beer, most people will take the beer.
    11. Re:Problem with PS3 release was... by Solra+Bizna · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Honestly I think that's one of the worst things that everyone always brings up. "Resistance isn't worth $660! Motorstorm isn't worth $660! VF5 isn't worth $660!" and so on. Fact: You're not going to be buying only one game for any system. If there is only one game that appeals to you right now, and you don't deem it worth $660, then it's not a good time for you to purchase the system, I agree. But how about when there are 3 games you're interested in? How about 5 or 6? 10? Where do you draw the line. At some point you need to stop asking yourself whether one game is worth $660 and look at what you'll get from the system as a whole.

      "Am I willing to pay $720 to play X and Y? What about $780 to play X, Y, and Z? $840 to play X, Y, Z, and W?"

      Clearer now?

      Me, I'd rather spend that $840 to be able to play over a dozen games on my Wii. ...Actually, I can think of much better things to spend that much money on. Like more computer hardware. You can never have enough computer hardware!

      -:sigma.SB

      --
      WARN
      THERE IS ANOTHER SYSTEM
    12. Re:Problem with PS3 release was... by atomicstrawberry · · Score: 1

      Personally I believe you should be intending to spend at least as much on games as you do on the hardware, so I divide the price of the console by 100 (rounding up to the nearest integer) and there has to be that number of exclusives that I really want for me to bite. Though this does work better for me in Australia - our games are roughly $100 each, new. So with a $1000 AUD pricetag, I would expect there to be at least ten PS3 exclusives in the works that I want before I buy one. Or the price would need to drop.

    13. Re:Problem with PS3 release was... by amuro98 · · Score: 1

      That's exactly how I look at it. I bought a PS2 at launch because there were 3 games out that I wanted to play - SSX, DOA2, and Dynasty Warriors 2. $300 console, 3 games.

      The PS3 is $600, so there had better be a library of about 6 titles that are either exclusive to the PS3, or somehow better on the PS3 than other platforms (360, PC, etc.) Until a game is actually released, it doesn't count towards this amount. I've seen way too many games get cancelled or delayed to base a purchase on something that doesn't exist yet.

      Looking at the lineup of planned releases, this won't occur until roughly mid-2008. This assumes we won't see additional changes in release dates, or see formerly exclusive games suddenly go multi-platform. The latter is the biggest fear I have for the PS3. With low sales, game studios may rethink their business plans regarding the PS3, which could lead to a nasty cycle of "no games -> no sales -> no developers -> no games..."

    14. Re:Problem with PS3 release was... by 7Prime · · Score: 1

      That, again is incorrect (sorry for the Sonic thing, I never knew). The NES didn't launch with Super Mario Bros. The game was released about 3 years after the Japanese launch, and a good number of months after the US launch (the NES was originally packaged with Duckhunt and Gyromite). The fact is, the console simply was fairly underground until the release of the game, which is why it's often considered a launch title... it, litterally, launched the system.

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    15. Re:Problem with PS3 release was... by lhbtubajon · · Score: 1

      Actually, your information is incorrect.

      In the U.S., at least, both Super Mario Bros. and the NES released on October 18, 1985.

      I agree that Japan did not launch with SMB, however we did seem to be talking about the U.S. market.

    16. Re:Problem with PS3 release was... by lhbtubajon · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, there were two versions of the NES when it came out; one had SMB and Duck Hunt, with the light gun accessory, and the other had Duck Hunt, R.O.B., the light gun, and one of the only games that used R.O.B., Gyromite.

      I bought the first version, because I wanted SMB, and Gyromite sucked.

    17. Re:Problem with PS3 release was... by DarkJC · · Score: 1

      I think that because of my perspective in Canada the PS3 doesn't seem nearly as expensive. In the US, the PS2 launched at $300 while the PS3 launched at $500($600). In Canada, the PS2 launched at $449(!) while the PS3 launched at $549($659...now $699 I guess). The way the currencies have fluctuated doesn't make the launch price of the PS3 (or the 360 when it launched) that out there. Heck, the 360 Core launched cheaper than the PS2.

      I guess this isn't really relevant to the conversation, but I thought I'd just point this out because it was interesting as I looked up the launch points of previous consoles.

    18. Re:Problem with PS3 release was... by delinear · · Score: 1

      Or they could raise the price of the games to $500 each and they'd only need two good ones for your system to entice you into buying ... Profit!!

  6. Vaporware by Cutriss · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "We have a hard drive, we have a commerce engine, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out we will have that on the network very shortly."

    Define "very shortly". The PSP was supposed to have this functionality for music over a *year* ago. It's been delayed so many times that I think people have largely forgotten about it. Sony was always talking about being able to use Sony Connect to purchase music and possibly videos on/for the PSP (in order to posture the PSP as a competitor to the iPod), but that clearly has not yet taken place. Why should the PS3 be any different?

    --
    "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    1. Re:Vaporware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the PSP doesn't have a hard drive built in.

    2. Re:Vaporware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't need one. There's a reason you can get larger Memory Sticks for the thing.

  7. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by AndyBassTbn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have to ask, is there really a such thing as "rock solid" engineering in the consumer electronics world?

    After all, the words "defect free" are often proven to be foolish ones, given the history of... well, anything.

    Don't get me wrong, I love the Playstation platform, and I agree that the Wii is going to have big problems once the novelty is gone. It just that your comment sounds an awful lot like marketing, rather than true commentary. (The fact that it's anonymous makes it even more suspect.)

    --
    I hope the land around you yields, a crop like all the other fields, and then your waiting might make sense...
  8. Cost reduction by rlp · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sony is selling the PS/3 at a loss. I've seen estimates as high as $300 (loss) per unit. Clearly their strategy is to get the manufacturing cost down ASAP and recover some of the loss via higher game royalty payments. They MAY even be limiting production - at least till they can further lower manufacturing costs.

    A risky strategy, when you consider the deep pockets of Microsoft (also selling their console at a loss), and that Nintendo is actually making a profit on their consoles. But it's still early in the cycle for this generation of consoles. Personally, I'm cheering for Nintendo. But it's MUCH to early to count Sony out of the game.

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
    1. Re:Cost reduction by LIGC · · Score: 1

      Actually, the 360 is now making some money for Microsoft, $75 per every premium sold. Of course, at launch they were losing $126 a piece, but improved manufacturing really flips it.

    2. Re:Cost reduction by amuro98 · · Score: 1

      Video game hardware has almost always been sold initially at a loss. It's one way to attract consumers in the begining. Meanwhile, the companies make that money back (and more, hopefully) through the licensing agreements they have with the software publishers as well as through the sale of extra controllers, memory cards, etc. It's essentially the same strategy started with razors - sell the handle cheap but charge a lot for the blades - not to mention inkjet printers ($50 for the printer - $30 for the ink?!)

      So yes, Sony's losing about $300 per PS3 sold according to guesses by industry experts. The PS2, as I recall, originally was costing Sony about $150-200 when it was first released.

      Unlike the PS2, however, the PS3 is suffering from a severe lack of decent games. Even initial PS3 sales were pretty disappointing since many of those PS3s were bought by people intending to sell the system on Ebay - so they didn't buy any accessories or games.

      Right now, the PS3 only has 1 good exclusive game, and a selection of games that are available on the 360 as well. These multi-platform games look and play almost identically on the 360 - which costs less than the PS3. In addition, many of those games are already part of the 360's bargin line so even the games are cheaper on the 360 as well.

    3. Re:Cost reduction by dabraun · · Score: 1

      Actually, the 360 is now making some money for Microsoft, $75 per every premium sold. Of course, at launch they were losing $126 a piece, but improved manufacturing really flips it.


      Where do you get these figures? Can you back this up? I tend to believe that the 360 was sold at a loss at release day and is making some small profit now but really that's just an opinion and they certainly don't publicly disclose this kind of information. Your reference?
    4. Re:Cost reduction by LIGC · · Score: 1

      http://www.isuppli.com/news/default.asp?id=6919 I tried to find it earlier and place it within my earlier post, but I failed miserably.

  9. Mods: This is funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The guy is doing a brilliant impression of an over-the-top fanboy.

    I mean, I thought he was serious until the last line, and then he kinda gives it away "no wonder the PS3 is nowhere to be found".

    I mean, other than every BJ's, Target, BestBuy, Circuit City, and Walmart, he's right. I mean, like dead-on right.

    1. Re:Mods: This is funny by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but at least this time, he didn't tout the PS3's untitled, unannounced, unknown developer, unknown release-date, vague-genre games.

  10. The PS3 has it rough by Hott+of+the+World · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The problem is 50% perception, and 50% targeted market. Here's what I mean:

    "Perception": People see 600 - 800 dollars and no games. They see a huge Sony ego and laughable selling numbers. No one's buying it, no one wants one.

    Reality: It can be bought here in the US for as little as 499 if you want the 20GB model, and if you're patient by summer we'll have a healthy injection of new games on the PS3. They even have more demos and movie trailers available in the PS3 network for free. Games are coming, and patience is key. I'm not an apologist. This is just how new consoles tend to work.

    As for the ego, it's there. But it's not contempt for consumers, as most detractors would have you believe. It's confidence. They're saying, "we're number 1". Sony needs to be seen as confident in this console outing. You want them to say "Yeah it sucks, get an Xbox?"

    The price is out of necessity, not arrogance. They're definitely losing more per console than Microsoft. Blu-ray was a risk, but not a totally harmful one. Prices will come down and the complaining will slowly go away

    "Target market" is the other aspect that's hurting the PS3.

    Not only do people not want to drop 500-600-800 dollars on a game system, they certainly don't want to pay more for the same games. That's the problem most 360 owners see with the PS3. They can't envy it any. Pay tons more for some future exclusives? Laughable.

    The PS3 is for people who want blu-ray, PS3, PS2, and don't have a 360 already, and are willing to spend at least 500 bucks for it, probably more. That's not a great subset of people.

    With all of that, it's a testimony to the power of Sony and its future exclusives that so many people are buying the thing.

    --
    | - | - |
    1. Re:The PS3 has it rough by (A)*(B)!0_- · · Score: 1

      ""Perception": People see 600 - 800 dollars and no games. They see a huge Sony ego and laughable selling numbers. No one's buying it, no one wants one. Reality: It can be bought here in the US for as little as 499 if you want the 20GB model, and if you're patient by summer we'll have a healthy injection of new games on the PS3. They even have more demos and movie trailers available in the PS3 network for free. Games are coming, and patience is key. I'm not an apologist. This is just how new consoles tend to work."
      So the perception is that there are no games. And your reply to this (your "reality") is that there will be new games in the summer. First, the perception is that there are no good games currently available. Just because some good games may come out in the summer does not change the fact that the perception and the reality of PS3 games RIGHT NOW is accurate.

      Anyway, my perception is that Sony is a terrible company that installs root kits on the computers of customers and files blanket lawsuits on legitimate companies in order to trounce consumer freedoms. I have the right of resale. Sony can take their lawsuits against lik-sang and stuff it. I will never buy a PS3.

    2. Re:The PS3 has it rough by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

      As for the ego, it's there. But it's not contempt for consumers, as most detractors would have you believe. It's confidence. They're saying, "we're number 1". Sony needs to be seen as confident in this console outing. You want them to say "Yeah it sucks, get an Xbox?"

      Obviously, but there's a point where confidence does become contempt. Or at least where it is seen as arrogance and presumption, and the customer is offended. As for me, that line was crossed by Sony's gaming division when they said that they thought people would get another job if they had to in order to get a PS3. It was the presumption that their shit was so hot that we would fall all over ourselves to get it, no matter what. That's not an appropriate form of confidence. It's the difference between "we will defeat our competitiors!" and Romero-esque "Ya'll are my bitches!"

      It's kinda like the dating scene. You need to be confident, right? Well there's a difference between going up to a beautiful woman in a way that suggests you are not intimidated by her, and walking up and saying "Hey babe, I'm the man of your dreams, you'll be sucking my dick by the end of the night, even after I do THIS!" and then slapping her.

      That might work sometimes (run screaming if it does), but it is hardly a good way to achieve broad market penetration, if you catch my drift.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:The PS3 has it rough by Hott+of+the+World · · Score: 1

      Sorry, in my defense, I was trying to point out that while it's true right now, its not indicative of the console's success in the grand scheme of things. It's not uncommon for a console, It has good reason for it, and It's almost over.

      "Anyway, my perception is that Sony is a terrible company that installs root kits on the computers of customers and files blanket lawsuits on legitimate companies in order to trounce consumer freedoms. I have the right of resale. Sony can take their lawsuits against lik-sang and stuff it. I will never buy a PS3."

      Sony is a terrible company. I wont hide it, nor will I make excuses. But I've bought things from terrible companies before, and I'll probably do it again.

      --
      | - | - |
    4. Re:The PS3 has it rough by Xymor · · Score: 1

      Yes, but are they worst than Microsoft(I'm not even enumerate why)?? How about Nintendo? Remeber Hiroshi Yamauchi reich?

      Botton line, they are all evil companies, but which one is the lesser evil?

    5. Re:The PS3 has it rough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As for the ego, it's there. But it's not contempt for consumers, as most detractors would have you believe. It's confidence. They're saying, "we're number 1". Sony needs to be seen as confident in this console outing. You want them to say "Yeah it sucks, get an Xbox?" No.

      What we want Sony to say, and this is the key to everything, is: "Customer, YOU'RE number 1."

      D.
    6. Re:The PS3 has it rough by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Reality: It can be bought here in the US for as little as 499 if you want the 20GB model,

      Five hundred bucks will buy a lot of stuff. It will almost pay my rent for the month (and I share a ~2000 sq.ft. house with a 400 sq.ft. addition on 12 ac. with my SO) and it's one-third of what I paid for my car, which is fuel-injected, has only minor dings, the paint is generally in good shape, and it has AWD and ABS.) That's a LOT of money! When you consider that consoles have tended to come out at $300 for some time now, $500 might as well be a thousand :P

      and if you're patient by summer we'll have a healthy injection of new games on the PS3. They even have more demos and movie trailers available in the PS3 network for free. Games are coming, and patience is key. I'm not an apologist. This is just how new consoles tend to work.

      You ARE an apologist if you propose that there is any reason to buy a PS3 right now, when there are pratically no games. The price ain't going up between now and summer, or any other time. So why buy one now? Why not play with your existing console now, and buy a PS3 when there's actually games for it?

      As for the ego, it's there. But it's not contempt for consumers, as most detractors would have you believe. It's confidence. They're saying, "we're number 1". Sony needs to be seen as confident in this console outing. You want them to say "Yeah it sucks, get an Xbox?"

      Oh, but this console is just dripping with contempt for customers; some clear and real, some implied and a matter of opinion. For example, there's the scaling issue. You have a game with 1080 and a TV with 720? Too bad, you get to play in 420! Whee! That definitely displays contempt for anyone who doesn't have the latest and greatest television. It says to me "720p is for little girly men!" And of course the statement that it was "probably too cheap". Yeah, okay, a Lotus Esprit Turbo might be too cheap for what it does too (it isn't, it's a POS that I can kick the shit out of with about $15,000 into a used Japanese sports car and some upgrades, but never mind that for now) but it's still damned expensive! Price-performance ratio doesn't matter when you price yourself out of a market.

      Note that a lot of people aren't buying an Xbox 360 due to cost, either. The Wii has gotten a super shitload of adopters based on price alone - I'm quite serious when I say that many people who didn't even consider a gamecube have already bought a Wii. The funny thing is that the people I've talked to have actually said they're not happy that it's mostly kiddie games (no I don't agree, but this is what they said) but the price difference was enough to get them to buy it. I suspect a large number of them are going to discover just how deep and wondrous some of those games are, and they will no longer be Sony fanboys. But that's just an analyst-worthy bullshit guess.

      With all of that, it's a testimony to the power of Sony and its future exclusives that so many people are buying the thing.

      No, it's a testimony to human stupidity. We supported Sony when they destroyed Sega by fraudulently marketing the PS2, for which they were never punished in spite of the fact that they had to know beyond the shadow of a doubt that they were full of shit. Now we're supporting them as they piss in our eye and say "It's probably tooo cheeeeeeap!"

      With all that said, I am an anti-Sony crusader. I cannot forgive them for the things they have done and I cannot give them money. I am also not buying an Xbox 360 nor any other Microsoft product unless I am forced into paying a Windows tax to get a cheap laptop which will end up running Ubuntu. If I buy any console of this generation, when my Xbox is still amusing me with XBMC and various emulators, and my PS2 is still keeping me busy with GT4 and GTA:SA, not that I hardly

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:The PS3 has it rough by Hott+of+the+World · · Score: 1

      "Five hundred bucks will buy a lot of stuff. It will almost pay my rent for the month (and I share a ~2000 sq.ft. house with a 400 sq.ft. addition on 12 ac. with my SO) and it's one-third of what I paid for my car, which is fuel-injected, has only minor dings, the paint is generally in good shape, and it has AWD and ABS.) That's a LOT of money! When you consider that consoles have tended to come out at $300 for some time now, $500 might as well be a thousand :P"

      It's a hefty purchase, but not totally outrageous. People paid 400 for the 360, and then hundreds more for the extras, like live.

      Some people care only about price. Others about value. I'm not going to convince you the machine is cheap. Relatively, it's not. The Wii is 250 dollars, and the 360 core pack is 299. All great systems if you're satisfied with their limitations.

      "You ARE an apologist if you propose that there is any reason to buy a PS3 right now, when there are pratically no games. The price ain't going up between now and summer, or any other time. So why buy one now? Why not play with your existing console now, and buy a PS3 when there's actually games for it?"

      I'll give you my reasons, perhaps you'll think I'm a fanboy, perhaps not.

      1. It plays HD movies.
      2. It will play next gen games, which at the time assumed would be better than their Xbox ports because of performance boasting. Currently, it looks like they'll play about the same.
      3. It plays resistance, which I find to be a decent game.
      4. It plays thousands of decent PS2 titles and I never bought the original PS2, nor do I have a
      PS1. I figure I can hold myself till new titles to come out.
      5. It has downloadable demos, and can run linux if I get bored of just playing my old games.
      6. Games that come out on the playstation are rarely, if ever ported to the PC. It's quite common with the 360.

      It simply offered a better value to me at the time.

      For some people there are no reasons to purchase a PS3. I am not those people.

      I also own a Wii. It's another system that's going to have loads of exclusives that I'll enjoy.

      --
      | - | - |
    8. Re:The PS3 has it rough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's kinda like the dating scene. You need to be confident, right? Well there's a difference between going up to a beautiful woman in a way that suggests you are not intimidated by her, and walking up and saying "Hey babe, I'm the man of your dreams, you'll be sucking my dick by the end of the night, even after I do THIS!" and then slapping her.

      The scary thing is I have actually met women who would be turned on by the latter scenario.

    9. Re:The PS3 has it rough by Hott+of+the+World · · Score: 1

      Another thing, don't attribute to malice what can easily be explained with stupidity.

      Sony has a lot to learn and a lot to change from it's old ways, but I think they'll manage. It might not be till later on, but I think we can still see a cheap PS3 and a ton of good games for it.

      --
      | - | - |
    10. Re:The PS3 has it rough by the_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Goddamn, I wish I had mod points today. Parent is the most insightful and true thing I've ever seen said about the PS3 since its release.

      --
      grey wolf
      LET FORTRAN DIE!
    11. Re:The PS3 has it rough by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Sega destroyed themselves. The support for the saturn and 32x did more to kill them then sony. Since the US was their primary market (they had taken the #2 then the #3 position in japan already) They did many foolish things to thismarket. Most of it was incredibly stupid business decisions. No matter how good the dreamcast was (and it was a goodmachine) their business decisions made further competition in that market impossible. All the Sega fanboys I knew (16) switched to sony after the 32x and saturn debacles. Sega was a gong show fromt he Sega Cd onwards.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    12. Re:The PS3 has it rough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > No, it's a testimony to human stupidity.

      I'm not sure what quality it is that inspires such windy polemics, but it's certainly not one I cherish.

      Just. Don't. Buy. One.

      Jeez.

    13. Re:The PS3 has it rough by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      The scary thing is I have actually met women who would be turned on by the latter scenario.

      It just proves that women were intelligently designed. Errr, wait a minute...
      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    14. Re:The PS3 has it rough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Games are coming for the PS3 for sure. But keep in mind that programming games for the platform is a real hassle. "Commenting specifically on the internal architecture of the PlayStation 3, Carmack said: "I think the decision to use an asymmetric CPU by Sony was a wrong one. There are aspects that could make it a winning decision, but they're not helpful to the developers."" - http://www.gamasutra.com/php-bin/news_index.php?st ory=12351

    15. Re:The PS3 has it rough by LKM · · Score: 1

      As for the ego, it's there. But it's not contempt for consumers, as most detractors would have you believe. It's confidence. They're saying, "we're number 1". Sony needs to be seen as confident in this console outing. You want them to say "Yeah it sucks, get an Xbox?"

      No, but they need a huge slice of the humble pie. They don't need to acknowledge the competition, but they do need to stop insulting their customers. It should be obvious, but since it apparently isn't, I'll say it: Insulting the people who buy your stuff is a bad idea. They are the ones who make you what you are.

    16. Re:The PS3 has it rough by LKM · · Score: 1

      Botton line, they are all evil companies, but which one is the lesser evil?

      The least total evilness is reached when all three companies have comparable market share and none of them can behave like they customer raping monopolists they would like to be.

    17. Re:The PS3 has it rough by Spacezilla · · Score: 1

      broad market penetration Wow, that is ridiculously clever on so many levels! Did you come up with that just now?
    18. Re:The PS3 has it rough by Steve001 · · Score: 1

      king-manic wrote:

      Sega destroyed themselves. The support for the saturn and 32x did more to kill them then sony. Since the US was their primary market (they had taken the #2 then the #3 position in japan already) They did many foolish things to thismarket. Most of it was incredibly stupid business decisions. No matter how good the dreamcast was (and it was a goodmachine) their business decisions made further competition in that market impossible. All the Sega fanboys I knew (16) switched to sony after the 32x and saturn debacles. Sega was a gong show fromt he Sega Cd onwards.

      One of the things I've noticed about the success/failure of video game systems is that a video game system will fail if the system requires additional upgrades/components (excluding controllers) to play some of the games. Put more simply: In order for a video game system to succeed, it must be capable of playing every game released for the system out of the box. The main reason I chose a video game system (PS2) for playing video games over a computer is that if I buy a game for my PS2, I can be sure that the game will run well.

      Besides Sega (with the 32X and Sega CD), another system that violated the above guide and died was Philips CDi. In addition to the system itself, to get full functionality you had to add a $300 video card to the system (it allowed you to watch Video CDs on the system and there were some games that required it). What also hurt this system was the lack of a large number of "gotta have it" games.

    19. Re:The PS3 has it rough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Perception": People see 600 - 800 dollars and no games. They see a huge Sony ego and laughable selling numbers. No one's buying it, no one wants one.

      Reality: It can be bought here in the US for as little as 499 if you want the 20GB model, and if you're patient by summer we'll have a healthy injection of new games on the PS3. They even have more demos and movie trailers available in the PS3 network for free. Games are coming, and patience is key. I'm not an apologist. This is just how new consoles tend to work.

      If you want the HD experience (and if you are buying a PS3, you do) then it is NOT just 499 for the cheap model. You are going to need a $100 HDMI cable. That puts the reality at $600 for the cheap model. And games are coming? I'm not so sure. Third parties are jumping ship. XBox is picking up franchises that used to be seen as exclusives on PS (such as GTA).

      As for the ego, it's there. But it's not contempt for consumers, as most detractors would have you believe. It's confidence. They're saying, "we're number 1". Sony needs to be seen as confident in this console outing. You want them to say "Yeah it sucks, get an Xbox?"

      The price is out of necessity, not arrogance. They're definitely losing more per console than Microsoft. Blu-ray was a risk, but not a totally harmful one. Prices will come down and the complaining will slowly go away

      There is a big difference between confidence and arrogance. Sony has the latter. The $600 price point was NOT out of necessity. Were they forced to stick a blu-ray drive in every PS3? No. They knew their price point was going to be ridiculous, but they made the decisions that forced them into a high price point out of arrogance.
    20. Re:The PS3 has it rough by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      All the Sega fanboys I knew (16) switched to sony after the 32x and saturn debacles.

      You will note that the next console they released was the Dreamcast, and we are currently talking about the issues that surrounded that console's failure. Saying that they "switched to sony after the 32x and saturn debacles" is to say that they bought a PS2 and not a Dreamcast. We are talking about why, not what, which we already know.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    21. Re:The PS3 has it rough by king-manic · · Score: 1

      The bad will compelled them not to buy it. Which lead to a feedback loop where 3rd parties didn't support it leading to fewer potential customers. The entirety of the reason with fear of similiar lack of support. This became a self fufillign prophesy when sega had to bow out because they had so little marketshare. Sony was or nintendo could have picked up the slack but Sony was in a better position to do so. Perhaps the marketting had some factors but the most compelling reason the sega fan boys had fro droppign sega was the fear it'd end up like the 32x, saturn, sega CD.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  11. The price is killing it by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's a really good time to be Nintendo, with the only "affordable" (everyone has a different definition of that word, I'm looking at it from a casual persons concept of "what I'd pay for a video game console") system out there. 360 is a little more tenable, but still sort of in the "hardcore" price range.

    With no HDTV, there's no compelling reason at this point to own either PS3 or 360. Eventually they'll have some more (and some *subjective word* good) exclusive titles, but as it is, almost everything is available for regular Xbox or PS2. So far I've yet to be blown away by any next-gen games, and here I sit with a Wii, and a 360, and really no games out there asking me to buy them. I have twilight princess and dead rising, respectively.

    It'll be a slower growth this time around. People aren't all that stupid, they know that despite all the techno-specs, they see the PS2/Xbox doing pretty much the same thing with pretty much the same controller. Developers don't necessarily want to jump onto 360/PS3, because the installed base of Xbox/PS2s is so large, there's much less room for profit.

    Also, interviews with MSFT and Sony reps are boring. They don't make video games, they just sell hardware.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:The price is killing it by Osty · · Score: 2, Informative

      So far I've yet to be blown away by any next-gen games, and here I sit with a Wii, and a 360, and really no games out there asking me to buy them. I have twilight princess and dead rising, respectively.

      Well, that might be your problem. Twilight Princess is very much a last-gen game in terms of everything but the Wiimote control (it spent years in development on the GC before a last-minute switch to Wii), and Dead Rising has ... problems with non-HDTVs that can severely hamper your enjoyment of the game. Neither is a graphical powerhouse (though Dead Rising is deceptive -- the non-cut-scene graphics aren't stunning like Gears of War, but then you realize you can have a thousand zombies on screen along with all of the breakable environment bits without any slowdown). I definitely enjoyed both (I actually enjoyed Dead Rising more than TP, since I got bored with TP about a 3rd of the way into the game), but I wouldn't really hold up either as the pinnacle of next gen game design for either console.

      For the 360, I recommend you pick up Gears of War, Viva Pinata, and Oblivion (if you haven't played it on PC, of course). Those three games are some of the most graphically impressive (even on an SDTV), and the gameplay is diverse enough (stop-and-pop shooter, pokemon-like Sims game, open-ended action/rpg) to satisfy different gaming desires. If you're into racing, I'd also recommend you keep an eye out for Forza 2 in the next couple months (I think the release date is May something?), which should blow away anything Gran Turismo has to offer on the PS3.

      For the Wii, there's really only one choice, and it's not about graphics. Since the Wii is all about the Wiimote, any representative game will have to do something innovative with it. I've been told Rayman: Raving Rabbids is excellent in that respect, but I haven't gotten around to picking that up because I already have the definitive Wii game -- Warioware: Smooth Moves. This is the game that will show you what is possible with the Wiimote (some obvious methods are obvious, others seem completely nuts, but all work beautifully). The game is a series of 5-second minigames, so that may not float your boat. I enjoy it because I can play for a couple minutes and then go do something else. But you must own this game if only to satisfy yourself that yes, somebody out there understands the Wiimote and can do great and innovative things with it.

      Also, interviews with MSFT and Sony reps are boring. They don't make video games, they just sell hardware.

      Last I checked, both Sony and Microsoft had in-house game development divisions. While you're right that the rep who is doing the interview doesn't make games, that rep doesn't sell hardware either. They're just spokespeople (sometimes bad like Kutaragi, sometimes good like Reggie, and sometimes neutral like Peter Moore).

    2. Re:The price is killing it by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      It's a really good time to be Nintendo, with the only "affordable" (everyone has a different definition of that word, I'm looking at it from a casual persons concept of "what I'd pay for a video game console") system out there.

      The Playstation 2 is still available for sale, costs about $130 brand new, and if titles like Guitar Hero II are any indication, the console is far from dead yet.

      The problem Sony faces is how to prevent PS2 sales from cannibalizing potential PS3 sales. Well, that's one of the problems they face.

    3. Re:The price is killing it by DarkJC · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't really say is as big a problem as you think. I think it's to Sony's benefit that the PS2 continues to sell well until the PS3 is more established with more big name exclusives. They're netting a healthy profit from each PS2 sold, and of course since there are so many out there I'm sure they net even more profit from the software flying off the shelves.

      Once the PS2 finally starts to die down the PS3 will suddenly be there with MGS4, DMC4, FF13, along with new franchises like Motorstorm, Lair, and Heavenly Sword. It will look much much much more appealing come holiday 2007 so I think that's likely when we're going to see the PS3 make some big sales.

    4. Re:The price is killing it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's a really good time to be Nintendo, with the only "affordable" system out there.

      What, has Nintendo released a new system? I have not seen any evidence of this, and I go to lots of games shops every week. Prove it!

  12. Re:I know ! I know ! by Hobbitgh0d42 · · Score: 1

    $1200 Per unit! Atleast according to Jack Tretton.

  13. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by jschul · · Score: 1

    How long do you think it will take for the Wii novelty to wear off? Most of my friends and family that have a Wii have had it for 2 months or more and still play Wii sports at least a couple times a week. I've seen the same story from numerous people online. What I will agree is that there will be less "gimmick" games as we progress. Just like happened with the DS. It takes a few tries for most developers to really understand what the Wii is really about.

  14. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used to think we had an insane Sony fanboy posting here... now I'm certain it has to be someone being paid by Sony. Nobody is that completely out of touch with reality.

  15. If any of this is true... by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...they might want to, I dunno, put it in a commercial or something? And, c'mon mods... flamebait? Seriously, there needs to be an IQ test before someone gets mod points.

  16. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by Cutriss · · Score: 3, Informative

    Rock solid defect free hardware - compared to the nightmare failure rate Microsoft still has going on with the 360.Really? I've seen a pair of them at a UPS Store being shipped back to Sony. I've also read reports from people back in December being told not to expect replacements for two months. Of course, I would assume that this estimate has since been revised, what with supply and all...

    Absolutely silent operation - bravo Sony engineering!

    Ah, yes...Sony engineering, which also gave us the Square button on the PSP and told us that we were wrong for not liking it. Also, the analog nub on the PSP freaking sucks. I'm glad there's only one, because the one that's there isn't very sensitive at all. You try making a circular motion with it sometime - it doesn't work. There are two speeds possible with it (all the way out and part of the way out), and the angular refinement is pretty shoddy. It's very hard to go from, for example, W to WNW to NW. You'll generally skip straight over WNW. Ever try web-browsing on the thing?

    BluRay has won the format war with only a couple months after the PS3 release BluRay already outselling the dying HD-DVD format 3-1. And one of the remaining HD-DVD studios just jumped ship to BluRay today. Pretty much all that remains is for Universal to throw in the towel.

    Nice for you not to provide a link here where you did everywhere else. Also, describing this as a format war is like calling the Falkland Islands War a war. The remaining 99.99% of the world didn't even notice it was happening. Also, Sony dumping its crappy back-catalog of movies into Blu-Ray, causing a large chunk of new titles to be made available, is not what I call winning - it's what I call "stacking the deck". Despite it's apparent capacity advantage, Blu-Ray is getting lower marks in the picture quality department, which, if you weren't keeping track, is kind of important to the people willing to drop $2000+ on a TV and $500+ on a high-def DVD player.

    PS3 has the top selling game in Japan now - Japan will be a fierce battle between Sony and Nintendo. Nintendo really needs to work on their release schedule. Wii owners are getting restless as the novelty of games like Wii Sports is wearing off.

    "Top-selling" is hardly the way to put it. With over double the install base of the 360, it hasn't managed to come close to outselling Blue Dragon. Watch next week, as Virtua Fighter 5 drops back to the mid-20's, while Wii Sports and Wii Play continues to sell the same amount each week (which proves that the novelty isn't exactly wearing off).

    Early previews are going gaga over Motorstorm with another online win for Sony with another completely lagfree game.
    http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1103341 [hardforum.com]


    No...RECENT previews are saying "Hey, this doesn't suck anymore". Early previews said it was complete and utter shit. Oh, and hey - that's the one the Japanese got! I'm sure they love the PS3!

    The Playstation Network is cranking out all sorts of very cool indy games like Flow and GripShift and we are only a couple months into adding content.

    No...the PlayStation Network is releasing a port of a Flash game that's been out for over a year, and another not-so-great Sony-first-party junker. Oh yeah - and the rubber ducky game.

    The one issue with HD tvs and PS2/PS1 games has been fixed and PS3 owners have rock solid 99 percent backwards compatibility with the giant library of PS2 and PS1 games.

    It's not 99%. Closer to 90%. Music games are still broken. Also, the "one issue" is actually two issues, one of which has been fixed. Ask a 720p-set owner if they're happy that they can't play in 1080i anymore.

    Virtua Fighter just about to hit the shelves.

    It did hit the shelves in Japan. It landed with a thud. See above.

    GDC sounds like Sony is going to have some pretty big announcements with even more

    --
    "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
  17. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by DogDude · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I agree that the Wii is going to have big problems once the novelty is gone.

    I've never seen or used a Wii, but I've got to wonder if the novelty isn't gone for most users of it, already. A $200 device isn't going to have anywhere near the precision (or graphics) necessary to make it a good, long term platform that people will enjoy for years like the PS2 has been. It seems like a gimmick, to me, that will wear off a few days after Christmas.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  18. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by ProppaT · · Score: 2, Informative

    Is this all sarcasm that's lost over the interweb? A few things.

    1) Everytime I try the PS3 in a department store, it freezes or is already froze due to overheating.

    2) Silent operation? Not sure about that. But, have you seen the insides of a PS3? It's 50% heatsink. Sure, it might run quiet, but even with the massive heatsink, it still overheats...and the trade off is the size of the system. It's absolutely massive.

    3) Last I checked, my local target had 5 PS3's, the EB across the street actually has a unit they've had since the first of the year, most stores I go to have "PS3 now in stock" signs (coincidentally right next to the "Wii currently unavailable signs"). Face, it, the PS3 is in stock everywhere. People who say otherwise live in an area that's having a spike in sales/popularity or an area that's getting below average allocations. FUD.

    4) BlueRay has far from won the format war. HD DVD was winning the war by a long shot until recently. It's yet to be seen whether the current spike in BlueRay sales has anything to do with the free movie Sony was giving away with PS3's or any of the current buy one get one free BlueRay DVD incentives that have been going on (most definitely Sony throwing fuel on the fire to hype their format...they're dead in the water if it fails).

    5) Virtua Fight 5 is already out in Japan. While it did top the charts with 48,346 in sales, It was only 3000 units ahead of Wii Sports, a game that's been on the market for over 2 months. Opening week big sellers typically always go to the 100k sales range the first week.

    6) Europe is not going crazy with preorders. This is FUD. If you want a UK news site's opinion on this, try this article: http://news.spong.com/article/11800

    7) You say "PS3 has the top selling game in Japan now " and then you say "Virtua Fighter is almost out." Are you just making things up, because Virtua Fighter IS out and IS the top selling game in Japan. Again, however, only by 3k units, being trailed closely by a game that's been out for months.

    FUD FUD FUD

    The PS3 will have it's heyday in the future when the price comes down and there's compelling titles. Until then, I suggest that you don't fall for Sony marketing FUD and live up to the reality that it's underperforming in the marketplace right now, even by it's skeptics predictions.

    --
    Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
  19. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

    What're you talking about? His post was rock solid.

  20. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    VF5 is out in JAPAN already and is the top selling game there.
    VF5 is ABOUT to come out in the US.

    Clear or does it need to made simpler for you?

    I won't bother with the rest of your fanboy tantrum.

  21. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 4, Informative

    Christmas was more than a few days ago.

    *please mod informative, please mod informative*

  22. Must be doing something right by SuperKendall · · Score: 0

    The PS3 60GB model has an amazing sales rank of 58

    Why is that amazing? Because Amazon does not carry the PS3 (except in short bursts where it sells out in minutes). The only ones you can buy are from third party sellers through Amazon for $720 or more (that's over $100 above list).

    So while you can find them in some stores, the PS3 must be doing something right if people are willing to pay $100 above retail to get them through Amazon.

    If Sony can raise production to the point where Amazon can list them for 24 hour shipping, then I think we'll see sales rise - also the release of Motorstorm should be another notch up in sales.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Must be doing something right by HappySqurriel · · Score: 2, Informative

      The PS3 60GB model has an amazing sales rank of 58

      Where the 20GB XBox 360 has a (pretty constant) sales rank of 5 and the Nintendo Wii has a sales rank of 4 according to eproduct wars.

      So while you can find them in some stores, the PS3 must be doing something right if people are willing to pay $100 above retail to get them through Amazon.

      No, it demonstrates how stupid people are because you can get a 60GB or 20GB PS3 from Gamestop.com for the regular price.

    2. Re:Must be doing something right by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      It still has over a month until release in a large part of the world, thus people are paying over retail on Amazon.

    3. Re:Must be doing something right by revolu7ion · · Score: 1

      Us nerds are much to busy and important to DRIVE to a department store... *flex*

      --
      Jesus Saves
  23. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    http://www.worldinhd.com/movabletype/archives/2007 /02/studio_canal_la.html

    Studio Canal was one of the last HD-DVD exclusive studios. Now it is pretty much just Universal keeping HD-DVD on life-support. Universal isn't going to be able to hold out much longer.

    The Nielsen numbers show BluRay anywhere from 2:1 to 3:1 sales advantage and the gap is growing. And this is all before the PS3 has even launched in Europe. Like someone in the avs forums recently posted, all that's left for HD-DVD supporters is the screaming.

  24. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by DesertBlade · · Score: 1

    I don't think the novelty will wear out, as long as developers keep coming up with creative ways to use the wiimote.

    --
    Half of writing history is hiding the truth.
  25. Oblig. Penny Arcade Link by Wyrd01 · · Score: 1

    Sony Execs say some hilarious things sometimes.
    http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2007/02/10

  26. Re:Landed with a thud? At number 1 by acomj · · Score: 1, Informative

    Virtual Fighter was #1 in japan last week. Landing with a thud?

    You should research a little before making patently FALSE statements.

    http://www.joystiq.com/2007/02/15/japanese-softwar e-sales-week-ending-02-11-07/

    One wonders why you care so much about all the consoles doing OK?

  27. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by twistedsymphony · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I consider myself to be a hardcore gamer and for me the Wii novelty wore off after about 2 weeks.

    The problem for me is games like Wii sports are just lacking the depth to really hold my attention, and for games like Zelda the use of the Wii remote is just rather "meh". IMO it didn't add anything to Zelda and I would not have enjoyed the game any less using a Wavebird.

    so about a month past buying the Wii it's started collecting dust and I've gone back to playing Xbox 360 games. IMO if the Wii wants to get past being a gimmick they need games that have the compelling depth of Zelda combined with the unique and value added controller usage of Wii Sports. So far the only title that really delivers that is Trauma Center, but I've already played that title... on the DS (widescreen support would have been nice too), Red Steel was close but the buggy game mechanics killed what uniqueness the Wii Remote added to it. I'm sure they'll come but as of right now I don't consider the Wii to be much more compelling then the PS3 is right now, if anything it serves as a nice show piece and entertainer when friends and family visit, and I'm sure there will be better games down the road... right now though, and I think the same holds true for many other hardcore gamers, there just isn't enough substance.

  28. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "It's not 99%. Closer to 90%. Music games are still broken. Also, the "one issue" is actually two issues, one of which has been fixed. Ask a 720p-set owner if they're happy that they can't play in 1080i anymore."

    Uh, the exact number of PS2/PS games with issues is known. Sony has a amazing database of every single PS2/PS game made with any issues the game has running on the PS3. No matter how small and trivial those issues are. The number of perfect games is up near 97-98 percent. And of the remaing games with issues many of the issues are thing like one pixel is off when running on the PS3. Yes that is one of actual issues for one of the games that 'don't work' on the PS3. The only major issue for PS2 games are the Guitar Hero controller and harddrive games.

    Sorry, but no one is falling for your '90 percent' BS.

  29. Blueray/HD DVD format war by Stevecrox · · Score: 1

    http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/02/12/ 2016222&threshold=1

    I think he was referring to the above slashdot article, basically in the last couple of months more blue-ray films have been released compared to HD-DVD, meaning there are now more Blue-ray films, which surprisingly means that more people bought Blue_ray disks over a month. To be honest I do think Blue_ray is going to win the format war since HD-DVD has had such a head start but doesn't seem to have much if any lead on Blue Ray.

    Still hedging my bets tho

  30. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long do you think it will take for the Wii novelty to wear off?

    It took a few days for me... now it gathers dust because I'm bored of minigames, Zelda doesn't interest me, and everything else on the Wii is either a port (in which case, why play on the Wii?) or a crappy licensed game of some random kiddie movie/tv show.

    I know some people like Wii sports, but c'mon, it's a tech demo.

    Hopefully Sonic will be good... but only if Sonic Team doesn't get a chance to screw it up.

  31. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by Aladrin · · Score: 1

    I managed to get one of the first Wiis, so I'm about as far along on the 'novelty' scale as anyone. The Wii needs more good games, just like the PS3 does. The major difference is that it DOES have some already.

    The biggest problem with the Wii is indeed insensitivity, as you suggest. But only with the pointing aspect. Using it like a laser pointer is horrid. There is NO adjustment to make it fit your TV. The end result is that almost nobody can position the sensor bar so that the area the 'mote reads is actually the area of your TV. It makes ANY gun-type game pointless and frustrating. It makes most games in the new WiiPlay play like crap.

    There's only been 3 games that I really enjoy playing.

    1. WiiSports. Excellently done. All the games are fun, just too short.
    2. Excite Truck. I expected a crappy racer. I got a decent racer with a nice gimmicky controller and some interesting terrain deformations and goals.
    3. Trauma Center: Second Opinion. Despite the use of the pointer, this game is surprising fun. I didn't like the DS version because it was way too hard on one of the early surgeries, and I gave up on it.

    RPGs suck on it. Yes, I'm including Zelda in that. The WiiMote interface does nothing to improve the game and only makes your arm sore from shaking the 'mote. Avatar was so bad I still have nightmares about it. Can they fix this? Well, they've already claimed they can't do proper sword-waving... Maybe a third-party dev will prove them wrong.

    As with any new toy, the novelty is indeed wearing off. I need good games now.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  32. Re:Must be doing something right, or are they? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So while you can find them in some stores, the PS3 must be doing something right if people are willing to pay $100 above retail to get them through Amazon.

    Of course, Amazon ships to countries where they won't let you buy a PS3 at retail yet ...

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  33. I'm not sure where the PS3 stands but.... by Mizled · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'm not sure where the PS3 stands but my Wii stands right beside my TV...

    --
    Bite my shiny metal ass.
  34. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's really an ominous sign for Nintendo is your exact same story is being mentioned by people all over the internet. The only difference is the amount of time it takes someone to go from hype to disillusionment. Some people it takes a few minutes, some a few days, and some a few weeks. What's worse is Nintendo appears to have completely botched online support for the console. Friend codes and developers are just getting online support info this month. Not good.

    I can't think of one third party game coming out for the Wii that I am excited about. That sounds a lot like the GameCube all over again.

  35. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

    When it comes to console games very few have ever had any substance or depth compared to what I play on the computer. Just curious what you are playing on the xbox360 that has depth to hold your attention. Keep in mind I've only played GoW on the xbox360 and other than I was playing it on my friends HD projector it just seemed like another FPS...

  36. Re:Landed with a thud? At number 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Patently false? People thought the sales numbers would be easily double that. There are 360 titles *besides* Blue Dragon which sold better. Blockbuster games in Japan usually land with at least 200K in sales in the first work. To fail to break 50K is very telling. And again - it barely edged out Wii Sports, which has been available for over two months.

  37. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by Stevecrox · · Score: 1

    Until last week I couldn't order a PS3 anywhere in my city centre, it wasn't until last thursday that the game shops put up signs letting you know you could pre-order a PS3. That means just over a month of possible pre-orders, a comparision would be my PSP that was available for pre-order for 4 months before its release where I lived.

    That pre-order time makes all the difference when I pre-ordered my PSP I started putting money away each month so come release day I had all of the cash, I have a month to save up for a PS3 (yes I know its been scheduled for March for a while but without a specific date I was very skeptical that it would make it.)

    The Wii is sadly still suffering stock problems and isn't making it onto the floor due to a back log of people asking for them, however I would like to make a point. Secondary sales (more Wii games, Wii joystick thing etc....) aren't selling in the store where I work. People buy a Wii and have Wii Sports but don't seem to be buying anything else which is odd I think. Thats purely ancedotal but I'd be curious if others see the same pattern.

    Will I be pre-ordering a PS3? I'm still not sure £464.97 for a PS3 and One game is alot of money.

  38. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God of War 2? The PS2 title? It's pretty, but it's not even close to 360 standards, never mind better.

  39. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by Rycross · · Score: 1

    I won't bother with the rest of your fanboy tantrum.
    Why? Because it has less to do with being a fanboy (pot calling kettle black, eh Sony fanboy?) and more to do with reality?

    Seriously, how can you honestly keep saying that they're sold out when theres tons of evidence going around that they aren't? I can walk into my Gamestop right now and buy one. Its hard to take you seriously when you don the fanboy goggles and sound like you're about to cream yourself whenever you talk about the PS3.

    Seriously.
  40. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GoW2 is a PS2 game and looks about as such. It's one of the better looking PS2 games but it looks about on level with gc/xbox/wii games. Not even close to a lot of 360 games....

  41. It is Inevitable, It is Our Destiny by Conception · · Score: 1

    So, I really don't want to buy a PS3, and I'm not impressed with the system really at all. I'm really happy whenever something bad happens to Sony because, They Are Dicks. This is fact.

    But, I have no delusions that the PS3 will not be amazingly successful. Because the PS3 has two franchises that the 360, currently, does not (So, I'll put in my disclaimer that if exclusivity is broken, my post is moot): Gran Turismo and Final Fantasy. It doesn't matter if we hate Sony. It doesn't matter if its over priced. It doesn't matter that they are dicks, which they are by the way. And it doesn't matter if we all want them to fail. When those franchises come out with their latest version, and people see that those latest versions are amazing and awesome and stupendous and the greatest of the series blah blah blah, they will buy. I wish they wouldn't, but they will. If the 360 has 20 million and the Wii has 20 million in households, people will still buy.

    And you know what the -worst- part of it all is?

    So will you. So will I.

    1. Re:It is Inevitable, It is Our Destiny by HappySqurriel · · Score: 1

      You do realize that 80% of the PS2's userbase did not buy a Final Fantasy or Grand Turismo game, right? [the top selling GT game was GT3 at 14.84 Million and the top selling FF game was Fianl Fantasy X at 7.93 Million]

      What people never seem to get is that people bought a PS2 because videogames are an inexpensive form of entertainment and the Playstation 2 was the most popular videogame system on the market; currently, you can't say that the PS3 is inexpensive, and the PS3 is not the most popular system on the market.

    2. Re:It is Inevitable, It is Our Destiny by king-manic · · Score: 1

      If being dicks is the benchmark for yoru business then no one should have it. Remember MS is a software cartel built on monopoly and aggressive marketting and Nintendo was a masssive tyrant back in the days it was #1 (NES - SNES).

      As for over priced, I don't feel that way. But it might because I have enough room in my budget to get the Ps3 and a whack of games and acccesories right now. All I am waiting for is a compelling game. My PS2 is starting to have slow load times so it's days are numbered (5 years old. not too shabby). The blu ray is nice since my HDTV is just a upscaled SDTV because of the lack of HD content from my IPTV provider. I have about 60-100 PS2 games (I haven't counted in a while) and I haven't played about 20 of them. So to get my monies worth I need BC.

      I'm problably not typical for the market though. I agree that it's way too early to see who will "win" this round. I think the Wii will be either #1 or #2. The xbox #2 or #3 and sony may still come out on top if they get their major franchises.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    3. Re:It is Inevitable, It is Our Destiny by cowscows · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can really only push that so far though. You would've thought that to be the case with the N64, wouldn't you? Sure Nintendo was sticking with cartridges, sure 3rd party devs were abandoning them left and right... They still had Mario and Zelda, everyone will buy their console! They're Nintendo for pete's sake! Except that Nintendo left a huge hole for Sony to leap into, and the rest is history.

      Sure, it didn't spell death for Nintendo, and the N64 had some great games and plenty of people bought them. But Nintendo gave developers and consumers plenty of good reasons to consider the alternatives.

      And if you don't think a $600 price tag hasn't made a lot of people take a good long look at the alternatives, then you have an abnormal sense of the value of money. And the alternatives in this round are both quality competitors, so Sony should be very wary of giving their fan base reasons to really think through their decision.

        While the hardcore fanboys will certainly buy whatever you offer them at whatever price you ask, the hardcore market is only so big. Development costs are increasing at a ridiculous pace, and if the growth of the hardcore market doesn't keep pace, a $600 console machine is not going to be a reasonable target for most developers. GT and FF are all well and good, but not necessarily enough to support an entire platform all on their own. Especially considering Sony's business model which seems to be to make up hardware losses with software in the future.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    4. Re:It is Inevitable, It is Our Destiny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gran Turismo isn't as strong as it once was because there are now competitors like the XBox exclusive Forza and Project Gotham, and the multi-platform TOCA series. Some say these competitors are even better than GT.

    5. Re:It is Inevitable, It is Our Destiny by Rycross · · Score: 1

      Yep, there was a reason developers dropped Nintendo, and it wasn't just because of the cartridges and Square defecting. They're a lot nicer company since they've had some humble beaten into them. In some ways I'd like to see that happen with Sony, as they're getting to be the same way. MS is MS, no more needed to go into that.

      PS3 is too expensive for me (and a lot of people) simply because there's one game out that I'd like to play, and one, maybe two, thats actually been announced. Exclusives that is. $500-$600 might not be too much if it had a huge assortment of titles, but as it stands you can buy a $150 and get a lot more for your money. This isn't a diss on the PS3, its just a fact of life for an emerging console.

    6. Re:It is Inevitable, It is Our Destiny by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      But, I have no delusions that the PS3 will not be amazingly successful. Because the PS3 has two franchises that the 360, currently, does not (So, I'll put in my disclaimer that if exclusivity is broken, my post is moot): Gran Turismo and Final Fantasy

      Gran Turismo was THE reason I bought a PS2. It's NOT enough to get me to buy a PS3. I paid $300 for the PS2 with GT3. I'm not paying $560 to play GT5. It's just not going to happen. For $500 I could buy a FWD beater, take it up in the BLM lands north of here, and go thrash it. Or spend $300 on a pissed off little nitro-powered RC car and still have lots of money for fuel and repair parts. And, I might add, I think buying the low-end console is a huge fucking mistake. So it's really $600, and that is just NOT going to happen. Period.

      Final Fantasy is fucking over for me. The last one I enjoyed was VII. FFVIII was one of the most stupid and boring games I have ever played in my life and it demonstrates that Square forgot everything they ever knew about ramping up difficulty in a way that draws the player in. I found myself continually frustrated in the very first areas in which I saw combat. I haven't played a Final Fantasy title since 8 and I would need a seriously compelling argument to do so since that pile of shit. They would have to send me a platoon of high-end-porn-worthy asian hookers for three years with my purchase to get me to buy a PS3.

      These were valid arguments for the PS2, but I'm afraid that for a lot of us, they just don't hold water when it comes to the PS3. The fact that it's twice the price has a whole hell of a lot to do with it, too.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:It is Inevitable, It is Our Destiny by Dorceon · · Score: 1

      So will you.
      Speak for yourself.

      So will I.
      Oh, you did.
      --
      What sound do people on rollercoasters make? Hint: it's not Xbox 360.
    8. Re:It is Inevitable, It is Our Destiny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony does not have Final Fantasy exclusively anymore .. FF XI was released on 360.

      Also, Square Enix has licensed the Unreal engine, so that suggests there maybe a cross platform game in the future .. not sure if it'll be a FF or not but seems likely...

    9. Re:It is Inevitable, It is Our Destiny by Rayonic · · Score: 1

      Gran Turismo and Final Fantasy

      The Gran Turismo series has been going nowhere lately, and people are starting to catch on. GT3 sold 15 million copies, while GT4 sold 8 million. The biggest regional drop was in the Americas, where it went from 7.1 million to 2.4 million sold. Gran Turismo fans are evaporating quickly.
    10. Re:It is Inevitable, It is Our Destiny by DarkJC · · Score: 1

      Your taste in games is none of my business (although you sound like you're taking his assertion almost personally from the sounds of it) but might I ask why you think buying the "low-end" console is a mistake?

      Unless you absolutely require WiFi and card readers I see no reason for it.

    11. Re:It is Inevitable, It is Our Destiny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I won't.

      I've never owned a Gran Turismo, and the Final Fantasy series bore the living piss out of me.

    12. Re:It is Inevitable, It is Our Destiny by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Unless you absolutely require WiFi and card readers I see no reason for it.

      Let me tell you a little story about a job and a laser printer that will help you understand where I'm coming from.

      Once upon a time, HP used to sell duplex adapters for their laser printers. They went on the bottom of the printer and slightly raised the complexity of every printer which supported such an addon. Ostensibly as a cost-reducing method, HP stopped doing this. They now sell printers in two versions, spending the money on the engineering budget instead of distributing it throughout the printers. Whether this makes sense in and of itself is irrelevant because the upshot is that you have two major results: One, people who don't even need duplex buy it because they might need it someday and they fear having to buy another printer. Two, people who do need duplex end up needing to buy a second printer, taking a bath on buying the first one since printers don't hold their value all that well given all their moving parts.

      At work, we are in the second category, but since the duplex version of the printer is $3,700, I don't think we're going to replace it anytime soon. Which means I get to keep doing it manually :P

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:It is Inevitable, It is Our Destiny by trdrstv · · Score: 1
      They would have to send me a platoon of high-end-porn-worthy asian hookers for three years with my purchase to get me to buy a PS3.

      If they did that, I would even buy the Premium version.

    14. Re:It is Inevitable, It is Our Destiny by trdrstv · · Score: 1
      The Gran Turismo series has been going nowhere lately, and people are starting to catch on. GT3 sold 15 million copies, while GT4 sold 8 million. The biggest regional drop was in the Americas, where it went from 7.1 million to 2.4 million sold. Gran Turismo fans are evaporating quickly.

      I for one can't wait for GT HD. Although I can't decide between versions... should I get the one without any cars? or the one without any tracks?

  42. First game is here by mechapanda · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A bit of context:
    I'm a long term Sega fan, and when I first moved to Tokyo 12 years ago spent up to 3 hours a night in my local arcade playing Virtua Fighter 2, Fighting Vipers, and Virtua On Oratorio Tangram, and played all three in competition.

    The release of the Dreamcast meant that I got to get the "arcade experience" at home, Soul Calibur with the official Sega arcade controller, and Virtua On with the Twin Stick controller was the best an arcade gamer could could buy.

    Until now:)

    ----

    Yesterday the first of the games I bought my PS3 for turned up, Virtua Fighter 5 and the Sega arcade controller.

    The controller is simply amazing, cost a fortune but an hour after unpacking it I was online ordering a second! It's currently sitting next to my Dreamcast official arcade controller which , well, looks a little tired.

    The game is purely for fight game fans, nothing here for the mass market, but for anyone who spent hours in an arcade playing the various Virtua Fighters it is an absolute must have.

    I don't want to even think about much a HDTV, PS3, and controller cost but I'm happy so it was money well spent:)

    Forget the console wars, if you are a arcade fight game fan, you need this game, the Tekken download, two Sega controllers, and a PS3. Sell blood if you have to, but get it.

    1. Re:First game is here by EGSonikku · · Score: 4, Informative

      You do realize Virtua Fighter 5 is being released on the XBox 360 as well though right? So I don't really see this as reason to buy it on the PS3 for $100 - $200 more than it would run you on the Xbox 360. And if the past is anything to go by, the 360 version will have nice online play and voice chat...does it on the PS3?

      http://xboxyde.com/news_3903_en.html

      --
      - "Scientia non habet inimicum nisp ignorantem"
    2. Re:First game is here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll get right on buying a PS3 once I can afford to move to Tokyo

    3. Re:First game is here by mechapanda · · Score: 1

      I've worked for one of the "Big 2" Japanese games companies in Tokyo, and I've seen up close just how much care and attention goes into an Xbox port:)

      If you want to play Japanese games buy a Japanese console, that way you know the developers are proud of their work...

    4. Re:First game is here by LeRaldo · · Score: 1

      And if the past is anything to go by, the 360 version will have nice online play and voice chat...does it on the PS3?

      No, the 360 won't have online versus play either....

      "1UP: There's a lot of controversy among western VF fans about the lack of online play capabilities in the games. What is it specifically about VF that you think doesn't work well in an online context?

      HK: The biggest problem is the time lag when executing techniques. VF runs at 60 frames per second, and every frame is important. We could make adjustments to eliminate lag, but if we did that, there would be no difference in the timing of the various moves, and the competitive aspect of the game would be ruined. We ran some tests in-house with simulated lag, but it wound up feeling like a completely different game!"

      http://www.1up.com/do/feature?cId=3149135

    5. Re:First game is here by HAKdragon · · Score: 1

      VF5's developers have said the game will not feature online play because the it would mess with precise timing of the game's movements. However, it will still have Achievements and Live! awareness that all 360 games are required to have.

      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs. We have a protractor."
    6. Re:First game is here by macshit · · Score: 1

      The controller is simply amazing

      I've only spent a bit of time playing the PS3, but the controller seems to be more or less the same horrid controller that the PS2 had... "simply painful" might be a bit more accurate.

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    7. Re:First game is here by DarkJC · · Score: 1

      If you read the sentence before that you'd realize he's talking about the Sega Arcade controller.

    8. Re:First game is here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you hit on it the head with "if you are an arcade fan" -a great big huge IF, given that arcades have mostly vanished from North America. There's no arcade to be a fan of.

      The current generation teen-30 remembers them and maybe still plays some games in the handful of places still in business. Most of the next generation, the kids in the 5-6-7-8-9-10 bracket who will be the prime buyers in five years, will never set foot in an arcade. The word has no meaning to them. None.

      Your proud arcade port game developers had better sort out what the hell they're going to do in the next five years when there's not enough market to keep staff employed.

      Anyway, I don't like arcade fighting games. Is there some OTHER overwhelming reason to buy a PS3? Is there another killer app? Haven't heard one yet.

    9. Re:First game is here by dabraun · · Score: 1

      VF5's developers have said the game will not feature online play because the it would mess with precise timing of the game's movements. However, it will still have Achievements and Live! awareness that all 360 games are required to have.


      Honestly I can't see how this is going to work for them. A 360 game without live (play) pretty much misses the point. I bought my 360 so I could play games with friends (and not just when they're visiting). It's all about playing with friends, together or against one another. I think this is (if it's not blasphemy to say it here) the real innovative thing MS has down with the 360 (and to a lesser extent the xbox) - they've made console gameplay a social experience.

      If I could control the universe every game would learn from the gears of war approach to co-op play (that is, you can play the whole game, story intact, together.) I was so dissapointed that rainbow six:vegas dropped the story for co-op and just had you play through the levels. It's still a good game but without online co-op (with the full story) I may never actually bother to finish it. Now I feel obliged to finish the single player story before I play through it with friends ... and I haven't gotten around to it.

      Crackdown at least seems to have decided to take a similar approach, and despite the fact that they appear to be pimping crackdown by connecting it to the halo 3 beta, I'm way more interested in getting crackdown than getting halo 3.
    10. Re:First game is here by iainl · · Score: 1

      Really? My 360 spends a LOT of its time playing Dead Rising, Oblivion, Amped 3, Geometry Wars, Zuma or Time Pilot. None of which offer online multiplayer. Even my games that do, the multiplayer is a relatively minor proportion of what I play, apart from co-op GRAW.

      Virtua Fighter nerds are _scary_ in their obsession over frame response to 60ths of a second. Sega can't satisfy them with the ping times you get over the internet, so they've decided to not bother. Seems fair to me.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    11. Re:First game is here by astrokid · · Score: 1

      I think the most compelling reason as a VF fan to buy the PS3 version over the Xbox 360 is that he has the game now :)

      --

      Chewie does not get a medal. Come on, George. Can a Wookie get a medal?
  43. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by ProppaT · · Score: 1

    VF5 is out in Japan and is only the top selling game by 3k units, it's opening week. Can I make it any clearer for you? How about by posting some hard figures on 1st week sales of the VF series (blatently ripped from user dohhyulittle at www.gamesarefun.com):

    Virtua Fighter series First Week Sales: (Famitsu)
    11/21/1994: SAT Virtua Fighter - 64,718 (Saturn Launch title)
    11/27/1995: SAT Virtua Fighter 2 - 540,539
    11/23/1998: DC Virtua Fighter 3tb - 97,659
    (DreamCast Launch title)
    1/28/2002: PS2 Virtua Fighter 4 - 356,897
    2/5/2007: PS3 Virtua Fighter 5 - 48,346

    It's clearly the slowest selling VF game ever. Read into this as you will. As far as the rest of my "fanboy" tantrum? All I did was respond point to point to your Sony "fanboy" tantrum. When you make blanket statements with no substance to back it up, expect someone to shoot you down.

    --
    Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
  44. Re:The price is killing it, but is it dead yet? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    The Playstation 2 is still available for sale, costs about $130 brand new, and if titles like Guitar Hero II are any indication, the console is far from dead yet.

    Actually, my son picked up one on sale this past summer for $100 brand new. And Guitar Hero III is coming out for the Wii.

    He's dead, Jim.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  45. Re:Landed with a thud? At number 1 by HappySqurriel · · Score: 4, Informative

    The "Thud" comment is (reasonably) justified ... According to VGCharts.org Virtual Fiter 5 sold 49,500 in it's first week

    Last week Lets Make a J-League Pro Soccer Club 5 sold 108,250 and Harvest Moon: The Island I Grew Up On sold 81,000 in their first week ...
    The week before Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas sold 220,750 and Romance of the Three Kingdoms Wars DS sold 81,750 in their first week ...
    And the week before that hack G.U. Vol. 3 sold 132,750 and Wario: Master of Disguise sold 94,000 in their first week ...

    These are very 'average' games in Japan selling 2 to 4 times as much as Virtual Fighter 5 did ... Another way to look at it is that Virtual Fighter 4 sold 367,500 in its first week. At this pace Sega will be lucky if Virtual Fighter 5 sells 100,000 to 200,000 copies in it's lifetime.

  46. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While you're busy pulling out your bullet points, you might double-check the fact that Sony has fixed the hard-disk games issue. In the mean time, music games (there's more than just Guitar Hero, you know) are still unplayable. We're talking Beatmania, DDR, Guitar Freaks/Drummania, and Pop'n Music, all of which are big, *big* in Japan.

  47. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by Rycross · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm really kind of annoyed at the number of "Collection of minigames" games that are comming out for the Wii. Wii sports was fun, dunno about long term staying power though. Thats not a dig on the game, its just my tastes.

    But then you get recommendations like Wario Ware and Raving Rabbids. More games of minigames. Theres Elebits and Zelda, and Trauma Center, but what else? Red Steel blows. I'm looking forward to Metroid Prime 3 and Smash Brothers.

    I hate to say it, but the one thing Sony Fanboy has been right about is that the lineup of Wii games have been a rather dismal succession of PS2/GC ports and minigames so far.

  48. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by Rycross · · Score: 1

    I know when the Wii came out the attach rate was significantly higher than the PS3. Something between 2 and 3 if I remember correctly. Also, Wii controllers were in very short supply around Illinois for a very long time. I'm not sure what the current situation is to be honest.

  49. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by Rycross · · Score: 1

    It doesn't fit. Paid astroturfers are paid to build up a reputation on the board, rather than post anonymously. And his posting style is so frothing-at-the-mouth-fanboy, and his facts so easy to dispute, that its unlikely he's actually helping Sony's position. One would think that marketers would be a little better at this thing.

    I'm guessing we just have a regular old fanboy who is so emotionally invested in his game system choice that he has to wear it as his one and only badge of pride.

  50. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you an idiot or something? Every point the OP tried to make is misleading or just wrong. This has already been clearly explained in a few replies to the OP...

  51. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by Rycross · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Unfortunately, I haven't seen much of that going on. Mostly just ports and "hey lets throw a bunch of nifty minigames together!" sort of games. I'm hoping this is a repeat of the DS situation, where developers took a while to get up to speed and really start making good use of the new features.

  52. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, it should be pointed out that the issues affecting these games are not peripheral-based - you can't play them even with the SIXAXIS (which all of them support).

  53. Regarding Japanese Sales by pi8you · · Score: 1

    Having followed the Japanese sales charts for the last 7-8 months(via http://www.m-create.com/jpn/s_ranking.html - tracking units sold, not units shipped), Nintendo has Absolutely Dominated the charts. Outside of maybe 2-3 titles, no Sony or XBox system game has sat in the top ten beyond its initial launch week, and only getting that far if its a highly anticipated title such as a Final Fantasy or Gundam or one of the number of non-USfootball/basketball sports titles that they seem to enjoy. By and large this has been thanks to the DS, with Wii getting in on the action now too. for fun, here's the system sales for 1/29-2/4: DSL 146,073 Wii 65,740 PSP 31,216 PS3 18,727 PS2 17,540 Xbox360 6,130 GBM 1,050 GBASP 724 GC 306 DS 119 GBA 28 Clearly Sony's better off than MS and the DS Lite eats everything, but we all knew that already. Worth noting though is that the Wii sold almost as much as all three Sony platforms combined, and the week prior it sold slightly more, with limited availablity seeming to be the only thing keeping it even close. On the software side, the only PS3 title on the list is Enchanted Arms @ 47th

  54. Thank you, Rain Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next you'll be extolling the virtues of K-Mart.

  55. When will the PS3 be finished? by tgibbs · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The problem with the PS3 is that after all this time it still doesn't really seem to be quite finished. Currently, games do not automatically support both of the major HD resolutions, 1080i and 720p (never mind 1080p). Most games will output only in 720p, relying upon the 1080i/p TVs to do a decent job of scaling. Some HDTVs have poor scalers, whereas others (primarily CRT-based monitors) will only accept a 1080i signal and are incapable of displaying a 720p signal at all, in which case they are limited to playing PS3 games in 480p (ED rather than HD). Early expectations that Sony would be able to correct this problem with a software update have not been realized. A recent software update seems to offer the potential for games to support a kind of kluged version of 1080i with reduced horizontal resolution, but this would have to be supported by additional coding in the games themselves, and does not help existing games. PS3 Blu-Ray movies, on the other hand, output only at 1080i/p, requiring 720p HDTVs (the vast majority of flat panel HDTVs) to do their own scaling. Again, not all do a good job of this. In contrast, the XBox360 seamlessly handles any standard output resolution from 480i to 1080p (although it has only component output, and most 1080p TVs will accept that resolution only over DVI).

    This is an amazing deficiency. For example, there are a variety of scaling DVD players that are capable of scaling conventional DVDs to any output resolution, including 480i, 480p, 720p, 1080i (and even one or two that will go to 1080p). Essentially all HD capable set-top cable and satellite adaptors and PVRs have this capability. So do stand-alone HDDVD and Blu-Ray players. The XBox 360-associated HDDVD player will output at either 720p, 1080i, or 1080p, although it does not upconvert standard DVDs.

    Another surprising omission is the lack of an infrared port. Sure, the PS3 uses RF for its controller (and its optional DVD remote). But at least Microsoft uses RF control as well, but they saw fit to provide the XBox 360 with an infrared port, making it compatible with widely used universal IR remotes.

    1. Re:When will the PS3 be finished? by DarkJC · · Score: 1

      One insight I've heard on the scaling issue is that Sony is trying to stay away from scaling in general. They spent so long touting "True HD" gameplay in native 1080p, but should the system scale just like the 360, developers could easily develop for 720p native (or even lower) and then just have it scaled up. No doubt this would've happened, and then that would be one more thing to tick on the negative PR list.

      Of course, the issue that people who bought into early non-720p HDTV's are getting screwed over isn't exactly helping their case either...seems like a lose/lose to me.

    2. Re:When will the PS3 be finished? by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      One insight I've heard on the scaling issue is that Sony is trying to stay away from scaling in general. They spent so long touting "True HD" gameplay in native 1080p, but should the system scale just like the 360, developers could easily develop for 720p native (or even lower) and then just have it scaled up. No doubt this would've happened, and then that would be one more thing to tick on the negative PR list.


      So Sony left out scaling support to prevent developers from doing what they actually are doing? That has to be the most ridiculous rationalization that I've ever heard. Sony could certainly have made the development environment support only development at 1080i or even 1080p if they wanted to, with downscaling to 720p but no upscaling, forcing developers to either develop at full resolution or go to a lot of extra work and expense to develop their own code to support development at 720p. They didn't do so. Moreover, it doesn't explain why the PS3 can't even downscale Blu-Ray for 720p TV sets.
    3. Re:When will the PS3 be finished? by DarkJC · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I guess for some reason they thought they'd get less 1080p native games? That might not have even been the reason. Whatever it was, unless it's worth all the negative PR, it seems like a pretty stupid decision. Also, I just noticed that in your OP, you mentioned the PS3 controllers using RF. The controllers and the remote use Bluetooth. Just thought I'd clear that up.

    4. Re:When will the PS3 be finished? by tgibbs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Also, I just noticed that in your OP, you mentioned the PS3 controllers using RF. The controllers and the remote use Bluetooth.


      Bluetooth is an RF (radio frequency) protocol.
    5. Re:When will the PS3 be finished? by DarkJC · · Score: 1

      Ah, thanks. Didn't know that.

  56. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

    Gears of War is a horrible example of depth, it's fun but IMO isn't worth more then one or two plays through the main campaign. I've actually written at length about the lack of a decent online portion as well.

    Condemned: Criminal Origins was available at launch and continues to be my favorite Xbox 360 title so far, single player only but the story was compelling enough that I'd love to see a feature length film from it. Dead Rising and Saints Row as sandbox games also offer plenty of interest holding depth and the kind of substance where it takes you a while to play through them, and then you can do it over again a few times and still not see everything. Dead Rising has the unique distinction of being the only sandbox game/adventure horror set in a Zombie Infested mall (at least that I know of) not to mention the story line is pretty interesting. Saints Row is a bit of a GTA rip-off but it builds on that forumula quite well and offers some unique multiplayer modes on top of it which I haven't seen before in any other GTA style games. And while their depth is arguable I'm a fan of fighting and racing games as well and I find Dead or Alive 4, Project Gotham Racing 3, Burnout Revenge and Test Drive Unlimited quite compelling for a gamer of my tastes not just for the off line play but the online play as well. Not to mention the availability of classic fighters like Mortal Kombat 3 and Street Fighter 2 put online where I can find endless amounts of worthy human opponents who still enjoy those games is quite nice too. And while I haven't played much of them I've heard from friend who spoke highly of Enchanted Arms, Phantasy Star Universe, Viva Pinata, Lost Planet and a few others as being quite compelling.

    I don't have anything against PC gaming, it's still quite a relevant platform IMO and a lot of the games I like on the 360 are PC ports: Oblivion, COD2/3, FEAR, Hitman, Splinter Cell etc. And while the benefits of these games on the PC over the 360 are definitely there I just don't play PC games anymore, I grew tired of the constant upgrades and tweaking required to get games to play and look how I wanted them to, but my reasons for no longer gaming on my PC are something for another discussion.

    I see the Wii as a decent party game platform, with the exception of a few key titles I saw the Gamecube in pretty much the same light. But party games IMO are just cheap fun for when you have a group of friends and are looking for some mindless entertainment. I typically play games in lieu of watching TV as my daily entertainment, so while it's nice to have some good family fun when you occasionally find yourself entertaining guests the Wii doesn't have anything for me as a console I can play on a daily basis.

  57. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by MeanderingMind · · Score: 1

    I have to ask, is there really a such thing as "rock solid" engineering in the consumer electronics world?


    There used to be a video on the internet where some boys tired of their Gamecube and decided to destroy it. They dragged it behind a truck, while someone else followed and filmed. The purple bugger took a good beating.

    Afterwards they brought it home and put Smash Bros in. The thing still worked. They later took a baseball bat to it, and it "almost" started up.

    I'm not sure if that qualifies as rock solid or not, but certainly durable.
    --
    Thunderclone: ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE! ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE!
  58. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "FUD FUD FUD"

    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

  59. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering the attitude dohhyulittle has, it's rather ironic that you can take his numbers and throw them back into his face as a sign that the PS3 is off to a rocky start.

  60. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by CorSci81 · · Score: 1

    Yes, I would say Nintendo has figured out "rock solid" engineering with the Wii remote. I mean, what other consumer electronic can you hurl through objects (i.e. tv screens, windows, walls, people's head) and it's still functional?

  61. Read your own links by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Even from gamestop, it takes up to 72 hours processing time to get a PS3 - so if you want one in 24, Amazon is your only choice. The fact that processing time from Gamestop (which normally ships the same day) is yet another indication that my basic point holds true - the PS3 is more popular than people seem to think.

    I am not passing judgment on the wisdom of people paying more than they could be for a product. I am pointing out that it happens, it appears to happen pretty often, and that is a measure of popularity. The Amazon salesrank of the 360 is meaningless to compare with the PS3 salesrank until BOTH systems whip within 24 hours (or are even carried at all by Amazon itself).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  62. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by MeanderingMind · · Score: 3, Informative

    PS3 has the top selling game in Japan now - Japan will be a fierce battle between Sony and Nintendo. Nintendo really needs to work on their release schedule. Wii owners are getting restless as the novelty of games like Wii Sports is wearing off.

    Virtua Fighter just about to hit the shelves.


    The hidden contradiction here is that the top selling game in Japan this past week was Virtua Fighter, it's not just about to hit the shelves.

    More importantly, it only sold ~3000 more copies than Wii Sports. Wii Sports has been on the market for 11 weeks now, and on its release week sold slighly most than three times as many copies as Virtua Fighter did. If the novelty of Wii Sports is dying, we can only assume that the novelty of the first four incarnations of Virtua Fighter is as well.

    I will grant you the point that Nintendo does need to work hard to keep their release schedule flowing smoothly, but this is true of any system with or without a special controller.
    --
    Thunderclone: ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE! ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE!
  63. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by zstlaw · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hmm lets check this "PS3 takeoff". Lets look at the top 30 selling games in japan
    last week. There was 1 PS3 game, 0 Xbox games, and 3 Wii games. Meanwhile there
    were tons of DS games in the top 30.

    It is sad when a "console's big name title" can barely take the top spot from a
    game that has been out for 2 months.

    PS2 - 2
    PSP - 1
    PS3 - 1
    NDS - 23
    WII - 3

    Top 10:
    01. (PS3, Sega) Virtua Fighter 5 - 48,346 / NEW
    02. (WII, Nintendo) Wii Sports - 45,897 / 1,004,555
    03. (WII, Nintendo) Wii Play - 36,090 / 879,432
    04. (NDS, Nintendo) More Brain Age - 32,800 / 3,963,712
    05. (NDS, Nintendo) New Super Mario Bros. - 29,026 / 4,118,078
    06. (PS2, Capcom) Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas - 27,519 / 304,113
    07. (NDS, Nintendo) Wario: Master of Disguise - 26,815 / 185,695
    08. (NDS, Marvelous Interactive) Harvest Moon: The Island I Grew Up On - 26,804 / 106,212
    09. (NDS, Marvelous Interactive) Luminous Arc - 25,676 / NEW
    10. (PS2, Sega) J-League Pro Soccer 5 - 24,468 / 131,541

    Next 20:
    11. (NDS, Nintendo) Animal Crossing Wild World
    12. (NDS, Nintendo) Picross DS
    13. (NDS, Nintendo) Common Knowledge Training
    14. (NDS, Nintendo) Mario Kart DS
    15. (NDS, Nintendo) Brain Age
    16. (NDS, Pokemon) Pokémon Diamond
    17. (NDS, Nintendo) English Training
    18. (NDS, IE Institute) Kanji Brain Test 2M
    19. (NDS, Pokemon) Pokémon Pearl
    20. (NDS, Sega) Sangokushi Taisen DS
    21. (NDS, Sega) Love+Berry
    22. (PSP, Capcom) Monster Hunter Portable
    23. (NDS, Square-Enix) Dragon Quest Monsters Joker
    24. (NDS, Nintendo) Hotel Dusk: Room 215
    25. (NDS, Rocket Co.) Kanji Test
    26. (NDS, Bandai-Namco) Heisei Board of Education DS
    27. (WII, Nintendo) Wario Ware Smooth Moves
    28. (NDS, Nintendo) 1000 Recipes
    29. (NDS, Nintendo) Kirby Squeek Squad
    30. (NDS, Sega) Puyo-Puyo!

    (borrowed from http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=14255 4)
    original sources include http://www.m-create.com/jpn/s_ranking.html and http://eg.nttpub.co.jp/ranking.html)

    I have played the PS3 and I am not impressed. I wanted to like it... But after
    trying it I am more likely to get an Xbox360 for my HD needs. Resistance Fall of Man
    was a huge disappointment. Decent graphics, awful plot... I preferred Red Steel (Wii)
    which is not even a great shooter. Heck I was playing Wii sports non-stop for a week.

    So far I would have to say Wii has won first round hands down. Microsoft has a chance
    to do well with the 360 if they keep the games coming, and Sony is in a world of hurt
    unless they somehow get everyone and their mother to buy their $600 clunker. Even a
    couple of really stellar games would have trouble selling the platform to me now.
    I never wanted to get a Xbox but Sony really didn't give me much of a choice.

  64. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by Apple+Acolyte · · Score: 1

    Yesterday evening my brother and I saw four PS3 boxes behind the glass at the electronics section of Target in Duarte, CA.

    --
    Part of the hardcore faithful who believed in Apple long before it was cool again to do so
  65. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by MeanderingMind · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you think about it, it really isn't all that surprising.

    At any console launch, at least to date, there has never been what could be considered a truly fleshed out, solely of good quality set of launch titles. Each console has had its focal points and weaknesses that were only compensated for later, whether it was sports and FPSs, RPGs and sandboxes, or Platformers and war games. One or two genres have always tended to get clustered around, leaving most of the rest sidelined or represented by lackluster titles.

    This is true of the current generation as well. The Xbox 360, the PS3 and the Wii all suffer from this malady. Each in its own fashion of course.

    For the 360 and the PS3, the developers have tried and true control systems and standards they can adhere to in order to be certain their games do not fail. As such, we see very familiar genres, and mostly ones that will appeal to the hardcore crowd. Those are the people who will be buying the early systems, so why make games aimed at a different demographic?

    For the Wii, the developers are understandably cautious. If their control schemes such royally, the game will flop. The safest bet is therefore to make a game with many control schemes. If one or two fail, it doesn't ruin the entire game. Hence, lots of mini-game collections. These serve to showcase much of what the remote can do.

    The result in both cases is an overly focused launch that is entertaining, but is little more than an appetizer. It wasn't until the second wave of games that the Xbox 360 really began to show its worth (Dead Rising, Gears of War). This will be true for the Wii and PS3.

    --
    Thunderclone: ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE! ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE!
  66. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by CorSci81 · · Score: 1

    Maybe you should re-examine your setup if you're having pointing issues. I haven't had any noticeable pointing problems since I got my sensor bar properly centered and calibrated the sensitivity. The only time I have real issues is if there's any other significant IR source nearby or I don't move my glass coffee table out of the way (the sensor bar reflects off of it and the Wii remote gets confused by other IR sources fairly easily).

  67. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by Jim+Hall · · Score: 1

    Hi. I think you are trolling, but I'm responding anyway.

    Also, the analog nub on the PSP freaking sucks. I'm glad there's only one, because the one that's there isn't very sensitive at all. You try making a circular motion with it sometime - it doesn't work. There are two speeds possible with it (all the way out and part of the way out), and the angular refinement is pretty shoddy. It's very hard to go from, for example, W to WNW to NW. You'll generally skip straight over WNW. Ever try web-browsing on the thing?

    I own a PSP, and think the analog stick/nub works just fine. I'm not convinced that you've used the PSP first-hand - I don't have a problem moving the nub from, as you say, W to WNW to NW. The analog nub gives me enough fine control in 'GTA: Liberty City Stories' to weave my car through traffic jams at speed. Likewise, I can make distant headshots in 'Star Wars: Battlefront II', which isn't exactly easy. Platforming in 'Daxter' works great.

    Sure, you need to get used to the analog nub, but it's basically a new controller so you would expect that. At least, I did.

    And yeah, I do use the PSP for web browsing. I do it every day. I have bookmarks to visit my local weather, view the mobile version of slashdot, read the news, keep up with my favorite project, etc. I also visit graphics-heavy sites on the PSP, but tend to avoid it because the screen size makes sites that use lots of graphics difficult to read. But IMDB, Wikipedia, and other "average" sites work just fine. When I'm not playing games on the PSP, I'll usually keep it near the TV so my wife & I can look up things in IMDB ("Who is that actor/actress? Looks familiar."), So, what's wrong with the PSP browser?

  68. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by CorSci81 · · Score: 1

    Really? Target in West Hollywood had two of the 60gb models when I was there last night. Probably still there today if you're lucky.

  69. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by CorSci81 · · Score: 1

    *whooosh* You might want to have your sarcasm detector fixed, it seems to be malfunctioning.

  70. In fact, read your first link! by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Look back at your eProductWars link. Look at the primary system graph lower on the page.

    You can see there what happens to the PS3 sales rank when they actually get units in stock to sell, as they had for a day or so around 1/28.

    Further reinforcing the point I am making about demand.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  71. Look at the sellers - US and protectorates only by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Pretty much all the third party sellers on Amazon seem to ship only to US states or protectorates.

    Forgive me if I am skeptical that the population of Puerto Rico is snapping up enough $700 PS3's to keep the sales rank around 58.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  72. Which countries? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    The third party sellers all ship to US and protectorates only. You forget that Amazon shipment policies are not the same as those of third party sellers who work through them.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Which countries? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      ah, good point. sorry then.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  73. Who isn't by tgibbs · · Score: 1

    So, I really don't want to buy a PS3, and I'm not impressed with the system really at all. I'm really happy whenever something bad happens to Sony because, They Are Dicks. This is fact.


    Yes it is. But if you know the history of consoles, who isn't? Nintendo was for a long time, despite their current good guy image. Microsoft still is; if anything, their record is worse than Sony's. Sega perhaps was not (if you give them a pass for "blast processing" and abandoning the 32X), but look what happened to them.
    1. Re:Who isn't by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Sega of america was evil to it's early adopters. The saturn and the 32x basically killed the market for the dreamcast. Dreamcast was awesome bust since they bruned so many with the Sat and 32x they had killed themselves. And releaseing a 200$ peripheral and then dropping it after 12 games is worse then pricing yoruself $600 or being a tyrant with your third parties. So Sega was evil too. In a much mroe tangable way to the end consumer.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  74. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by Cutriss · · Score: 1

    I own a PSP, and think the analog stick/nub works just fine. I'm not convinced that you've used the PSP first-hand - I don't have a problem moving the nub from, as you say, W to WNW to NW. The analog nub gives me enough fine control in 'GTA: Liberty City Stories' to weave my car through traffic jams at speed. Likewise, I can make distant headshots in 'Star Wars: Battlefront II', which isn't exactly easy. Platforming in 'Daxter' works great.

    Sure, you need to get used to the analog nub, but it's basically a new controller so you would expect that. At least, I did.

    And yeah, I do use the PSP for web browsing. I do it every day. I have bookmarks to visit my local weather, view the mobile version of slashdot [slashdot.org], read the news [bbc.co.uk], keep up with my favorite project [freedos.org], etc. I also visit graphics-heavy sites on the PSP, but tend to avoid it because the screen size makes sites that use lots of graphics difficult to read. But IMDB, Wikipedia, and other "average" sites work just fine. When I'm not playing games on the PSP, I'll usually keep it near the TV so my wife & I can look up things in IMDB ("Who is that actor/actress? Looks familiar."), So, what's wrong with the PSP browser?


    Aside from memory/speed issues in the PSP browser, nothing is inherently wrong with it. I've used it quite a bit at night while lying in bed, and once or twice on IMDB as well. ;) It's pretty convenient for that sort of thing.

    What I'm referring to is that I've had a frustrating time trying to use the nub to move the cursor around. Try to make a smooth circular motion with it - it's rather difficult. And it's not just my PSP - I actually own two of them, and it works like this on both.

    The reason you wouldn't see this behavior in GTA is because you don't use up and down very much on GTA when you're driving - you only do when you're walking. I literally get chills when I'm walking on a dock in Portland Docks because one slight mistake with the nub and I'm sleepin' with the fishes. When I'm driving and just having to make left/right motions, you're right, it works pretty fine.

    It's possible that the control itself provides more granular control than the web browser is willing to admit. The cursor only has two speeds in the web browser, but I don't recall only having two speeds of walking in GTA. I have had some times when I've been trying to drive and I've put the wheel to the stops because I *just* passed the middle-region where it seems like it goes from "small movement" to "large movement".

    And I'll be honest - I traded in Battlefront II without playing it because I had read the reviews beforehand, and the game was given to me as a gift.

    --
    "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
  75. Too early. by king-manic · · Score: 1

    I paid $560 (CND) for my first run PS2 (still working) with summoner. It was a terrible game but the system paid off for me. The 60g PS3 is ~$650 CND here now so the differential is just inflation for me. For the 20 gig version it's no difference. Remember the Ps2 was expensive at first too. 2 years later it was $300 CND. 6 year slater it's $170 CND. It's not that far from the PS2 price point after inflation and the 20g model is at the exact same price point. Most of the "price" backlash is MS fanbois finding fault. You can find more fault with the RSX and lack of universal shaders and little edge over the 360's Xenos or the split memory architecture or the cell's ridicoulous learning curve and lack of good devleopers tools but the price isn't a huge issue. It's price is close to the ps2 release price.

    As for the graphics and power arguements, they are fairly close to each other. The cell might offer awe inspiring vector and floating point but the universal shaders will ensure the 360 can mostly keep up graphically with the same or better frame rate. The tripple core will keep the 360 in the game as multi processor technique develope and the unifired memory of the 360 may make more sense and flexibility then the split "fast" ram and "normal" ram of the ps3. But time will tell. I can see some situations where the Ps3 set up makes more sense but I'm not a game programmer. But in the end, it all come down to the games. No matter what the 360 has on the ps3 the letters FF, MGS, GTA, GT, GOW will mean more then RSX, XENOS, GDDR3.

    --
    "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    1. Re:Too early. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did not understand a word you just said.

    2. Re:Too early. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your final argument, which everyone loves to make, makes two big assumptions:

      1) That they will remain to be exclusive for Sony. Final Fantasy, Metal Gear and Grand Theft Auto were originally on Nintendo. Final Fantasy switched at 7, Metal Gear at 3 and GTA at 3. The point here is that these are all Third Party Developed, meaning that they can and will switch based on market forces. As for God of War and Grand Turismo... GOW is a new comer and not a developed franchise. GT is a great point and I will concede that.

      Now an indepth analysis of each series/game: (because why not?)

      God Of War: A great plot and a fun battle system but as I said, it is not a built franchise. This means the credibility is not there yet since GOW could be nothing more than a 1 hit wonder. As a side note, GOW was interesting and fun but I did not think it was an excellent game like some of the FF, MG or GTA games. Infact, I think it had the worst possible ending battle and that kind of ruined the whole experience for me. I think the best part of the game was the beginning with the epic battle against the Hydra.

      Grand Turismo: I have not played the recent incarnation of it because, well, to me its been the same game. Feel free to argue this point. As to what I meant above: Out of all of your examples, GT was the only one that has never been released on another plateform. So, this may stay a Sony exclusive.

      Metal Gear: I know you pointed to MG solid but there have been other games that have come before that. And as I said I think it was the third in the series. Actually, MGS is not a Sony exlusive at all since it has been ported to both the Xbox and Gamecube. Konami (Okay, Silicon Knights) did release an exlusive MGS: Twinsnakes, for Nintendo. This kind of behavior tends to show that Konami is more interested in selling the game then on which plateform.

      Final Fantasy: Considered to be the giant in Japanese Role Playing Games. Again, they have jumped ship from Nintendo to Sony. Also, they have made games for Nintendo even after jumping ship. Who's to say their next release will be or stay exclusive. Or if they will not produce exclusive for a different console.

      Grand Theft Auto: There were two releases of the series before GTA3. Also, again, the original releases were on Nintendo...I think. So, they can jump ship if they wish.

      Shadow of Colusses: I'm bringing this to the discussion since I found it to be better than GOW but the same points for GOW apply here.

      Zelda/Metroid/Mario: If we are discussing "system making games" we must talk about N's everlasting franchises. I know the arguments: these are first party games and don't count, we are talking 3rd party developers, etc. No, we are talking games and games that sell systems. Actually, I brought these up to prove a point. It takes a LOT more than just a couple of franchises to make the system. GC and N64 were considered the "losers" of the their respective generations. N64 had what is considered one of the best games of all time: Ocarina of Time. It also had Super Smash Brothers, Mario 64 and many more franchises but it still lost to Playstation. Not because of the quality of games, or even the franchises, but instead because of quantity.

      2) Didn't think I'd make it here did ya? Anyway, the second assumption to your agument is LASTING POWER. I threw in Zelda/Metroid and Mario because they have it. They are franchises older than some of the people on Slashdot. FF, MG, GTA are also very old franchises that have survived the test of time. The question is can they keep it up and can you add to their ranks? Can GOW become a lasting endeavour or will it fade away. One example of a franchise that has not lasted was Contra. Yes, they are still around but not in force. My point here is that, just because the game was good before does not mean that it will continue to be. For example, FF. Many people in my generation think the FF has been on a slow decline of quality and fun since the movie

  76. Re:The PS3 stands proudly beside... by gamer4Life · · Score: 1

    ...6-month old XBox 360s.

  77. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by Aladrin · · Score: 1

    The problem is the size of the virtual window compared to my TV. And there's no way to change that.

    If I put the sensor bar RIGHT up against the lcd portion of my screen, it's almost perfectly centered. But it's still way too far from the edges of the screen and you end up pointing it a few inches in from the edge to point at the edge. This reduces the range. If I put it where the manual says, on the stand at the front edge, the lower edge of the virtual window is below the screen and the upper edge is WAY below the top of the screen. It also has issues depending on whether your tv is higher or lower than the wiimote because it only has 2 LEDs to work with. If you are above the TV and it's pointing down (you're standing) then the virtual area is tilted backwards. If you're below the TV (sitting) then the virtual area is tilted forwards.

    There's a lot of bloody issues.

    I know it's not a calibration issue because I've done all that. I can turn the sensitivity all the way up and it still only sees 2 dots, and sees them clearly.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  78. Most Trolls are Microsoft Fanboys by gamer4Life · · Score: 1

    It makes sense... Microsoft had a head start so they've sold the most units, and therefore has the biggest fan base so far. Since it has the most users, they've got the most fanboys. Also, since Microsoft is considered somewhat of an underdog, these fanboys are more furious in their defense of Microsoft because they are concerned about their investment.

    Nintendo fanboys are too busy playing with their Wiis, while the PS3 hasn't garnered it's share of user yet.

    First the Microsoft fanboys attacked the PS3, but the trend is shifting towards attacking the Wii as well. Notice that an anti-Wii, anti-Sony post got modded up Insightful, even though it was biased towards the XBox 360. Nintendo fanboys should be wary - the real threat to Nintendo is Microsoft's fanboys - they're an important part of Microsoft's marketing arsenal.

  79. The PS3 is *cheaper* than the XBox 360 by gamer4Life · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you play online, if you use WiFi, or if you watch HD, the PS3 is cheaper than the XBox 360. If you include all three, it's vastly cheaper.

    WiFi - $100
    online - $200 over 4 years
    HD drive - $200

    Add $500 to the XBox 360 price if you're using all these features.

    Most people that have an XBox 360 use online, so the price of a premium XBox 360 is greater than a premium PS3 but without the HD drive.

    1. Re:The PS3 is *cheaper* than the XBox 360 by gamer4Life · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Funny how Microsoft fanboy mods moderate down anything anti-XBox or pro-Sony while pro XBox 360 posts get modded +5 Insightful or Informative (even funny) even though they're just full of half-truths, illogical arguments, and other Microsoft FUD.

      It's a sad day when Microsoft fanboys have infiltrated Slashdot...

    2. Re:The PS3 is *cheaper* than the XBox 360 by batkiwi · · Score: 1

      But sony doesn't have a competing online service, so you have to factor that in somehow. (They allow online gaming, but they don't have anything close to what xbox live is)

    3. Re:The PS3 is *cheaper* than the XBox 360 by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      Most people that have an XBox 360 use online, so the price of a premium XBox 360 is greater than a premium PS3 but without the HD drive.


      I use online, but it didn't cost me much of anything. I just ran a cable from my router to the 360. Even if I wanted to pay for Microsoft's overpriced USB adapter, why would I want to bog a game system down with the speed limitations of WiFi?
    4. Re:The PS3 is *cheaper* than the XBox 360 by izprince · · Score: 1

      You could also look at it this way. Person who doesn't give a crap about wifi, online access, or an HD movie drive get the 360 for $400 compared to the mandatory $600 for the PS3, hell, there are even XBOX 360 bundles now with a free game (Like Call of Duty 2 or Moto GP). Anyway, you can start with a base system and build it up. I'm using a spare Linksys Wireless G adapter that cost me $40, I really could care less about investing in proprietary non-standard video formats that might not even be around in a couple years, and the online service does things that the Playstation Network just sucks at, like permabanning cheaters and enforcing a code of conduct, that make it worth the few dollars a month.

  80. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You fool, you try that plan and you won't wake up until the we are at war with those pesky athiest otters.

  81. Another sony marketing initiative? by rbarreira · · Score: 1

    Hey, sony marketing droids, wasn't that flog enough?

    --

    The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
  82. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by Zaatxe · · Score: 0, Troll

    *please mod informative, please mod informative*

    Do you need karma this bad?
    (I would mod you "Insightful" if I had mod points, anyways...)

    --
    So say we all
  83. Interesting trend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i always wandered why PS3 which allow you to run linux on it, and in that sense is amazing piece of hardware for the money (Small media center linux running pc, with blue ray and running old ps2 games and downloaded games for ps3?).
    This is not that expensive for the price they asking.
    Yes in the end the problem is getting this amount of money is hard. Might need to spent time saving. But i like the fact that i don't need to pay for live service on it. That something no one ever take into account as the price part (except one poster here). Sony do have a lot of problems, but actually i would be disapointed if PS3 fail because that thing in my opinion has amazing potential with more games coming out on it.
    I am not a fan of the system or sony.

    At this point i don't have money to buy any of the consoles, but one reason for me to buy ps3 might be using it as a media center, with linux on it.

  84. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by ProppaT · · Score: 1

    Fear, uncertainty, doubt...exactly what the post I replied to was full of. I can't help that someone is afraid that their console of choice is off to a rocky start and feels the need to try and convince the rest of the world in hopes that it changes peoples opinions. Either that or the person is blind to reality.

    --
    Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
  85. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by ProppaT · · Score: 1

    I don't care about his attitude, just as I don't care about yours. The numbers speak for themselves.

    --
    Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
  86. Well, yeah by tkrotchko · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Wii sports are just lacking the depth to really hold my attention"

    Wii sports was a demonstration disc thrown into the box for free. It was intended to show consumers and developers the proper way to use and develop for the Wii.

    Of course it lacks depth. There is no depth. But you get what you pay for. In this case, you get a whole lot more.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
  87. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by bogjobber · · Score: 1
    2) Silent operation? Not sure about that. But, have you seen the insides of a PS3? It's 50% heatsink.

    This was true for the PS2 also, at least when it first came out. My PS2 has a heat sink over the entire area not covered by the DVD drive. I can't speak for overheating as I've never played a PS3.

    Oh yeah, YHBT.

  88. I've had my PS3 for... by bealzabobs_youruncle · · Score: 1
    3 weeks, Resistance is great, more games on the way and Blu-Ray looks amazing. Most of the negative stuff comes from two camps; those who think it is too expensive and those who support other platforms.

    While thie price is high, you are getting a lot for that money and it would be more expensive to put the equivalent 360 together (I don't mention the Wii because it doesn't compete with hi-def solutions). The hardware performance can't be argued, HDMI is a plus, the hard drive is of decent size, built in WiFi seems a no brainer these days and while including Blu-Ray may have delayed the unit and cost a little more it will benefit PS3 owners down the line. The games line up looks more promising all the time and once Sony starts unleashing those franchise exclusives and originals (and devs get the hang of the hardware and provide better ports) it will be tough to spin the PS3 as a bad choice.

    For people who have already gone with the 360 it's only natural some will be constantly negative as they will want to have bought into the dominant platform. But outside of a Playstation Network that is feature anemic but appears set to improve with the next couple firmware upgrades, the gap isn't as wide as they would like to pretend.

    And finally... Motor Storm, LAIR, Drake's Fortune, Tekken, Warhawk, new game from ICO team, Devil May Cry 4, Ratchet and Clank, etc...

  89. How to make money by achurch · · Score: 0

    1UP: Wait? You guys are doing this to make money? Really?
    PH: That's videogame hardware 101.

    Step 1: Drop the stupid Blu-ray drive.
    Step 2: Manufacturing costs plummet.
    Step 3: Profit!

    Sorry, just had to get that off my chest . . .

    1. Re:How to make money by izprince · · Score: 1

      But then you couldn't stuff 47 hours of mind-numbingly boring CGI onto one disc!

  90. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by IKnwThePiecesFt · · Score: 1

    I think he was mocking the OP's excessive use of the term "rock solid"...

  91. Sprint, not Marathon by LKM · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Apart from R:FoM, what does the PS3 really have? Until better games come out, there isn't going to be an increase in demand at this point.

    I'm wondering whether that will be enough. It took the PSP quite a while to come out with some decent games, and it seems to be too late. The console war is more of a sprint than a marathon. Your console needs to achieve critical mass quickly in order to get good third-party support. If that doesn't happen, a few good games a year later won't move enough boxes to change the course.

    It seems that third-party devs are already moving support from the PS3 to the Wii, even after only a few months of sales. That could spell disaster for Sony.

    What could help the PS3, though, is Bluray. If (and that's a big if) people want to move away from DVDs, the PS3 may yet reach a market. Even then, however, it's unclear whether that market would also be interested in games.

    1. Re:Sprint, not Marathon by Fizzl · · Score: 1

      Replying just to null my mod. Wanted to mod insightfull but slipped in the new browsing system and accidentally modded you reduntant :(

    2. Re:Sprint, not Marathon by Rosebud128 · · Score: 1

      But the goal is to sell software, not hardware. If Blu-Ray becomes the successor to DVDs (low probability), PS3 MIGHT sell because it has a Blu-Ray player. But this does nothing to boost the software sales (where all the money is).

      Look at the PSP. PSP's great selling point is a portable video player. Hardware is selling but the software sales are very low. By adding all these 'non-game' functions into the console, Sony has given incentive to consumers' entertainment time to be spent on something other than games.

    3. Re:Sprint, not Marathon by LKM · · Score: 1

      If Blu-Ray becomes the successor to DVDs (low probability), PS3 MIGHT sell because it has a Blu-Ray player. But this does nothing to boost the software sales (where all the money is).

      Well, it might do something. The question, of course, is how much, and as I've said, it's entirely unclear how many games people who buy a PS3 as a Bluray player would buy. Probably some, but probably not very many.

    4. Re:Sprint, not Marathon by newsblaze · · Score: 1

      I don't know where he got the information, but: Playstation 3 Review
      Although there is a rather small library of games for the PS3 right now, you can expect some amazing games in the near future. Sony has the support of many game developers that have become famous over the years that will be putting out some high quality games.

      --
      Daily News http://newsblaze.com
  92. Everyone and his mother and his grandmother by LKM · · Score: 1

    Yeah. Nobody wanting to buy your product is a good thing, and not being able to manufacture stuff fast enough is a bad thing. In your bizarro parallel universe. Nintendo clearly underestimated the demand for the Wii, but look at the sales numbers. It's not as if there were no Wiis available because Nintendo didn't make any. They're clearly not making enough, but they are making a ton of them.

    There are no Wiis available because everyone and his mother and his grandmother (quite literally, too) are trying to buy them.

  93. PS3 in Europe by LKM · · Score: 1

    Living in Europe, I can tell you that lots of my friends were able to get Wiis. Wiis are still generally sold out. I know one person who will definitely get a PS3 (for Gran Turismo). Furthermore, Amazon UK took quite a bit of time selling out the PS3 preorders (over 9 hours, last time I checked). Wii preorders were sold out in 2 minutes. It's all anecdotal evidence, but I think people are wising up to the PS3. It won't do as well as in the US.

  94. Different Question by LKM · · Score: 1

    they have x million yen development cost, and then they sell the first few thousand consoles on launch day for $250 each. Can every one of these sold in the very beginning make a profit? I don't think so.

    That's a different question from the one which was asked. Obviously, you can't get back your investment instantly. The question is: Does each sold console add to your gains or to your losses?

    1. Re:Different Question by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Depends very much on how it is phrased. What I said is a valid rebuttal to the typical /. fanboyism of "Nintendo makes a profit on every console sold", which is often used in a context of "they will make a profit regardless of how many they sell". Well they don't for the reason alone that i stated. They need to sell a certain amount of consoles to even break even.

      And then there is the additional question of whether the manufacturing + overhead cost of each sold console is below their sales price, and this was answered in at least one interview with Miyamoto I have read, but am too lazy to google now. As stated, they take a loss per console at certain points in the lifecycle.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    2. Re:Different Question by LKM · · Score: 1

      Well, the fact remains: Nintendo almost never takes losses on their consoles, and they've only had one simple quarter where the company had to post losses (and that was due to currency fluctuations). Sure, they are not directly causal. You can make a profit on every console sold and still lose money due to investments you've made to develop the console. But that is besides the point, since I don't think anyone would claim otherwise.

      Nintendo's model certainly seems healthier for the business, and fairer for competitors, compared to what Microsoft is doing - paying for Xbox market penetration with money from Office and Windows.

  95. Wii Sports by LKM · · Score: 1

    It's very rare to have a system-seller game at launch. Out of all of the various different console launches over the years, I can only think of two such cases -- the SNES launch with Super Mario World, and the Xbox launch with Halo.

    Wii Sports is viral. That's really all I can say. Zelda may have a huge attach rate, and it definitely shifted a few consoles, but Wii Sports, as simple as it may be, is the Wii's true system seller.

    Probably at least as effective as Super Mario World.

  96. Yeah. Just like the NES had huge problems. by LKM · · Score: 1

    Don't get me wrong, I love the Playstation platform, and I agree that the Wii is going to have big problems once the novelty is gone.

    Yeah, just like the NES had huge problems once the novelty of the D-Pad wore off. Joysticks FTW!

  97. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by LKM · · Score: 1

    A $200 device isn't going to have anywhere near the precision (or graphics) necessary to make it a good, long term platform that people will enjoy for years like the PS2 has been.

    Yeah, because the PS2 has such great graphics (and precision, whatever that means) compared to the Wii. And we've all seen how spectacularly the DS has failed. I mean, the DS has all those ugly games, some even 2D, believe it or not, it's not like anyone would want to play these.

  98. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by LKM · · Score: 1

    While I love both Wii Sports and Zelda (I hated using the hook in the Wind Waker since I could never get it to hit the targets using the Wavebird - the Wii controls are so much better), one of them is a pack-in originally intended to be a tech demo, and the other is a port of a Gamecube game. It's hardly fair to judge the Wii based on these two games.

    Either way, I consider myself a hardcore gamer, I got a Wii on launch day, and I still play Wii almost every day.

  99. Calibrating the Wii Remote by LKM · · Score: 1

    There is NO adjustment to make it fit your TV.

    Actually, that is kind of wrong. There are two ways to fix this issue:

    1. Some games, like Zelda, allow you to calibrate the cursor. I don't know why Nintendo didn't include that in the Wii itself instead of forcing games to do it, but there you have it. It's certainly possible for games to fix the issue, and light gun games would have to do this.
    2. You can "cheat" by creating your own sensor bar, which is pretty easy (it's just two sets of IR LEDs on each side - you could even make two non-connected Sensor Bar parts to figure out how far apart they need to be). The Wii expects the Sensor Bar to be about half as wide as your TV. If you do that (and experiment a bit with the size of the bar), you can get your cursor to match your remote perfectly without any calibration.
    1. Re:Calibrating the Wii Remote by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      Moving it closer isn't really an option (it exagerates the up/down problem), but I'll look into making a wider bar. Knowing it should be about half the width of my TV will help a lot. I appreciate the advice.

      I also never found the calibration in Zelda. I'll have to go look now. Red Steel and WiiPlay badly need it, also.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    2. Re:Calibrating the Wii Remote by LKM · · Score: 1

      Ah, another tip: I used two Roomba virtual walls to figure out how wide the sensor bar should be. Candles probably work, too. You need to open your setting in Zelda. I didn't find it on my own, either, I read on the Internet that it was possible to calibrate in Zelda, and only found it when I actually went and specifically looked for it.

  100. Yet another way to fix the Sensor Bar Problem by LKM · · Score: 1

    Ah, just to add to my previous answer, there's a third way to fix the problem: Move the sensor bar to be closer to you. That way, the Wii remote will more closely match your larger TV (although even back when I did not do that, I never noticed an issue. I have a beamer which projects a picture about 6 meters in diameter. People who came to my place actually asked me how the Wii knew how big my screen was - they never noticed that they only moved the pointer and didn't directly point at it).

  101. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by LKM · · Score: 1

    Agreed. It's kind of amazing. My brother hit the ceiling with his remote. Three times. My dad smashed it into a cabinet. I hit the wall twice. Some of my pals who came over to play hit the walls. No, I don't have such a small living room, it's just that with four players playing tennis and trying to avoid hitting each other, the wall kind of becomes a natural target. Anyway, all remotes still work perfectly fine.

  102. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

    This generation - and I'm including the 360 because it's only now hitting it's software stride - has had probably the worst rollout of any generation I can remember. The PS2 had at least 4 compelling titles at (or nearly at) launch, as did the Dreamcast. I think the only fumble titlewise was the N64 for the first 5 months. This time it's across the board. In the rush for 4th quarter revenue - the developers must have been utterly screwed.

    I'd love to hear some concrete numbers from the dev-crowd on how many months in advance ANY dev-kit (regarless of how sucky they were) actually appeared in advance of launch because all I've heard to date is "oh crap this" and "the libraries that" but no idea how long they've even had the things.

    I suspect the answer would scare the crap out of any early-adopter.

  103. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by iainl · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but if "BluRay has won the format war" because it spent two weeks (weeks in which Best Buy was doing a buy one get one free offer, at that) outselling HD-DVD 3-1, then Sony should be shutting the PS3 factory down right now, given that Wii and 360 do that to it all the time.

    This war is far from over. Wait until June, when only one of the two formats gets The Matrix, then come back to me.

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  104. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by scot4875 · · Score: 1

    Actually, FUD usually refers to what is being spewed by (for instance) Microsoft as to why you *shouldn't* buy someone else's product. They try to say things that make the competition look undesirable.

    What the original poster was saying was mindless optimism, which isn't really FUD. He's trying to encourage people to buy a product. He certainly might be feeling fear, uncertainty, and doubt, but he's not spreading it.

    --Jeremy

    --
    Jesus was a liberal
  105. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by Zaatxe · · Score: 1

    Hey, I remember that post of yours! I also remember I would mod it up if I had mod points at that point. Anyway, I had no idea I would be modded down for asking you if you needed karma that bad, I was trying to be funny, but, you know, "I must be new here" and I still don't get the sense of humour of Slashdot's universe. Well, I could also be modded "troll" for praising your post (saying I would mod it "insightful"), who knows? But that's Slashdot, "where you are modded troll or flamebait if you don't love Linux and/or Google!"(R)

    --
    So say we all
  106. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by truespin · · Score: 1

    "for games like Zelda the use of the Wii remote is just rather "meh". IMO it didn't add anything to Zelda and I would not have enjoyed the game any less using a Wavebird. "

    Go back and play ocarina of time or windwaker (as I have recently done) and then make that comment again - you will find that it is largely untrue. Yes the sword fighting by waggling the wiimote is a touch contrived but the pointing abilites of the wiimote (for the hookshot, ball & chain, boomerang, bow & arrow etc.) makes using these weapons *fun*. And for me felt like I was more skillfull - riding epona whilst taking down flying beasts with my bow and arrow and using the boomerang the extinguish the burning cart. Doing that with a wavebird would be *much* harder and certainly less enjoyable...

  107. Yes, the number does say much by LKM · · Score: 1

    The number of sold consoles does not say much

    Yes, it does. It says "if you create a game for that console, you can sell it to that many people."

  108. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by Mordaximus · · Score: 1

    1) Everytime I try the PS3 in a department store, it freezes or is already froze due to overheating.

    Of course, that has nothing to do with it being in a sealed display?

    2) Silent operation? Not sure about that. But, have you seen the insides of a PS3? It's 50% heatsink. Sure, it might run quiet, but even with the massive heatsink, it still overheats...and the trade off is the size of the system. It's absolutely massive.

    I haven't seen a properly placed PS3 overheat yet. I hear more complaints about the need for and size of the xbox 360 external power supply than I do about the size of the PS3.

    3) Last I checked, my local target had 5 PS3's, the EB across the street actually has a unit they've had since the first of the year, most stores I go to have "PS3 now in stock" signs (coincidentally right next to the "Wii currently unavailable signs"). Face, it, the PS3 is in stock everywhere. People who say otherwise live in an area that's having a spike in sales/popularity or an area that's getting below average allocations. FUD.

    I find it very interesting how you say "people who say otherwise live in an area that's having a spike..." yet your proof is based on stores in your area that you've seen. It couldn't be that PS3 is just having a lull in popularity in your area?

    Besides, there are no Atari 2600 on the shelves either. Does that mean it sells as well as Wii? No, that's not a dig at the Wii. Nintendo is either intentionally or unintentionally keeping stock scarce. But using lack of availability as the sole indicator of popularity is misguided.

    4) BlueRay has far from won the format war. It's yet to be seen whether the current spike in BlueRay sales has anything to do with the free movie Sony was giving away with PS3's or any of the current buy one get one free BlueRay DVD incentives that have been going on (most definitely Sony throwing fuel on the fire to hype their format...they're dead in the water if it fails).

    a) How does a disc that was given away for free a while ago affect SALES in recent times. b) Sony isn't the sole stakeholder in Blu-Ray, nor are they the sole inventor or backer. c) They weren't dead in the water when (Minidisc|Beta|Memory Stick) "failed." Nice Counter-FUD though.;)

  109. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

    Gotcha, I've seen Dead Rising commercials before and it looked like a cool game. Maybe one day I'll own a 360 and pick it up :)

    As far as the Wii goes maybe it just works for me b/c I only play games with friends nowadays. Once grad school is done, maybe that will change and I'll be able to pick up a 360 and/or ps3 on the cheap...

    Oh, and you mentioned Mortal Kombat. If you haven't seen it yet, you should check out the vid that's floating around showing how they are adapting it to the Wii. Looks pretty interesting.

  110. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by ookaze · · Score: 1

    ... Sonic for Europe, Excite Truck, soon Fire Emblem for Japan, Dragonball Z. 6 games, 6 different genres.
    Seems like good to me, less than 3 months after launch, with developers that weren't even ready to develop for the Wii less than one year before.
    Of course there are lots of mini games and ports, as the devs were caught with their pants down, when they saw the popularity of the Wii at the last E3.
    I'm sure some of them waited the launch to be sure, and felt stupid for missing the opportunity to sell 200k+ poor games and make lots of money easily.
    "Devs going on easy" time will end soon, if it hasn't already.
    When Nintendo start launching the quality titles, devs will have a harder time justifying poor quality games or ports. Seems like Sega knows it, and Capcom knows it too, but notice these are japanese game companies. Notice that most of the poor ports come from western companies. One of the reasons having the japanese market is such a good thing.
    They better get familiar with the wiimote ... fast !

  111. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by Rycross · · Score: 1

    I tried out Excite Truck and it wasn't my thing, but thanks for the other suggestions. I'll check them out whenever I am able to find a Wii (they still line up outside Best Buy before opening here....).

  112. Stop using VG Charts!! by Rosebud128 · · Score: 1

    Please, everyone, stop using VG Charts as a source for 'information'. The site uses other people's data and performs its own 'adjustments'. This would not be bad if VGCharts would tell us what these 'adjustments' were. Don't trust any sales information that doesn't reveal how it obtained its data. The maker of VG Charts is using other charts' data (such as Media Create, Famitsu, and NPD) and applying his own 'adjustments' to claim it his own. See all the advertising on that site? Yeah.

    VGcharts is NOT reliable.

  113. Gimmick and Novelty Games... by Rosebud128 · · Score: 1

    I suppose we can add Wii Sports to the list of horrible gimmick and novelty games along with...

    -Nintendogs (sold around 9 million by now I believe)
    -Sims (best selling PC game)
    -Myst (second best selling PC game)
    -Brain Age (sold millions but not sure how much)

    I remember when I first played the NES. The light gun was cool but the Duck Hunt game lost its appeal quick. That Super Mario Brothers game? Get big by eating mushrooms? Gimmick. And what was with that new controller with its 'D-pad'? I went back to the REAL controller of the joystick with my hardcore games on the Commodore 64 thinking exactly on the line of 'novelty' and 'gimmick'.

    Twenty years later, I am a little wiser. I know hardcore gamers would be more accurately labeled as 'addicted' gamers. And watch the young kids as the younger generation breaks for the Wii. They will grow up with the Wii-mote and consider it standard while the 'omg hardcore' players become seen as old cranks touting how awesome the classic controller and 'epic games' are.

    I know this because I am currently seen as an 'old crank'. I still think the joystick is awesome and that my 'epic games' went downhill to these awful JRPGs. The "hardcore" gamers believe they have a 'future'. They never did in previous generations.

  114. Re:PS3 Kicking Ass On All Fronts by challlen · · Score: 1

    Thankfully you put the dates with the numbers.

    The comparable virtua fighers are the first one, and 3tb.
    The reason is because the other virtua fighters were sold when the hardware userbase was much larger.

    You are right. It is the slowest selling Virtua Fighter.
    I think the numbers are reasonable, considering November/December video game sales are typically four times the sales of other months. (Can't find any links to back this up)
    I'm not sure I would call it's sales a failure yet.