Slashdot Mirror


Pidgin 2.0 Released

An anonymous reader writes "After nearly two years of development, Pidgin 2.0 has finally been released! Originally called Gaim, Pidgin is a powerful and robust open source instant messaging client that supports many protocols. Pidgin 2.0 features a completely redesigned interface with attractive new icons and and a new status management system that was designed for optimal usability. Pidgin 2.0 also adds support for universal buddy icon management and smooth-scroll functionality for conversation windows. A comprehensive review at Ars Technica explores the new features in Pidgin 2.0 and demonstrates how to use the new D-Bus bindings with Python to make Pidgin's status system send updates to Twitter."

249 comments

  1. dat iz awesum nuz! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    GAIM wz a gr8 progrm so Xpect8Nz R hI 4 DIS foLow on. gr8 job!

    1. Re:dat iz awesum nuz! by Turey · · Score: 2, Insightful
      How is this Off-topic? Not only is it a direct comment on the topic, but he also apparently read TFA pretty well:

      After much discussion, the Gaim developers decided to call the program Pidgin. "We like the name," Egan told me. "It was the second choice we all really liked. We were thinking up linguistic terms, and someone mentioned Pidgin. Another developer commented that 'corrupted language' may not be the best thing to associate yourself with, to which another pointed out something along the lines of 'have you ever SEEN people talk on IM?'"
      (Emphasis mine)

      Either he's commenting on the argument used in the name selection in a clever and humorous way, or I'm vastly over-analyzing this...
  2. VoIP by utnapistim · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So ... will it support VoIP?

    If it connects with GTalk (for example) it would be cool (and long overdue)

    --
    Tie two birds together: although they have four wings, they cannot fly. (The blind man)
    1. Re:VoIP by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 5, Informative

      So ... will it support VoIP?

      Not this version. If you read the conclusion section of the ArsTechnica article, you will see that this is on the roadmap, but when is another matter.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    2. Re:VoIP by Fifty+Points · · Score: 1

      GTalk as in Google Talk?
      That is just Jabber, you know.
      Just connect to Google.com and enter your username and password, and voila!

      --
      I'm in between insightful sigs right now...
    3. Re:VoIP by utnapistim · · Score: 2, Informative

      Connecting for chat to GTalk is no big deal right now.

      What I was interested in, was connecting to GTalk for VoIP. That isn't supported right now.

      --
      Tie two birds together: although they have four wings, they cannot fly. (The blind man)
    4. Re:VoIP by jbrax · · Score: 3, Informative

      So ... will it support VoIP?

      Check out this open source VoIP and video conferencing software http://www.openwengo.com/

      WengoPhone 2.1 has instant messaging support, implemented using libgaim, can connect to MSN Messenger, OSCAR protocol based networks such as AIM or ICQ, XMPP based networks such as Google Talk and Jabber, and the Yahoo Messenger networks.

    5. Re:VoIP by sinan_imam · · Score: 1

      One of the primary reasons it doesn't support VoIP is that the Jingle specification for voice and video chat over Jabber/XMPP hasn't completely settled yet. It is currently in "experimental" state, but it is expected to rise to "draft" state very soon http://blog.xmpp.org/ . Then Google's libjingle will be updated according to this standard, and lots of programs (Pidgin, Kopete, Psi, ...) will have VoIP support through open free standards.

    6. Re:VoIP by Ilgaz · · Score: 0

      Connecting for chat to GTalk is no big deal right now.


      What I was interested in, was connecting to GTalk for VoIP. That isn't supported right now.

      It is open source project. Adding GTalk (voice) to it just needs 10-15 Google engineers adding themselves to developer list, submit changes to code or start a google voice tree.

      A small company (compared to google) who is doing commercial Jabber servers has came up with their all open source, open standards and XMPP based video conference protocol addition to Jabber.
      There it is: http://sourceforge.net/projects/tipicforge/

      I mean, it seems like Google really doesn't want everyone conference each other via standard software.

      What can they do? Start another reverse engineering process? You see what happens, you even have to change name.

    7. Re:VoIP by dave1g · · Score: 1

      you mean libpurple ;-)

  3. Pfft. by kraemate · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I cant believe that there is no jingle support yet.
    IIRC, google released a library for voice extensions to the XMPP protocol quite a while back. When is gaim/pidgin going to incorporate it - so that i can make calls to gtalk users? The other clients like psi, kopete have already done this - why cant gaim?

    1. Re:Pfft. by SkunkPussy · · Score: 1

      I stopped using and recommending it 6 months ago, because I was fed up with the lack of progress on the project. Specifically, it stopped connecting to the msn network. Back then it was clearly a dead project, as 2 months would go by without the next beta version being released.

      --
      SURELY NOT!!!!!
    2. Re:Pfft. by igotmybfg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because you and I are too lazy to write the plugin?

    3. Re:Pfft. by Miseph · · Score: 5, Informative

      Two months ago they were held back by an agreement with AOL that they wouldn't make any major releases as part of a trademark suit. A couple of weeks ago they announced that the project's name was changing, that AOL was getting off their back, and that they would resume non-beta updates. Lo and behold, they've released one.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    4. Re:Pfft. by CaptainDefragged · · Score: 1

      That's not accurate. The recent version of Gaim (2.0.0 beta 5) works fine with MSN on both Gentoo and Windows XP. There was a change to MSN that broke Gaim on Win32, but that was fixed pretty quickly.

      --
      Don't tailgate - the end is near!
    5. Re:Pfft. by kraemate · · Score: 1

      Sure they have released a 'final' version. But it is no different than the betas. Heck, in terms of functionality it is the same as 1.5. Only thing they have bothered to change is the UI.

    6. Re:Pfft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's open source. you're a linux nerd. so go fix it smarty pants...

      ms fanbioy

    7. Re:Pfft. by kripkenstein · · Score: 1

      What do the legal issues with AOL have to do with not having Jingle support yet? Sure, the AOL debacle prevented releases, but no reason not to develop meanwhile...

    8. Re:Pfft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because you were using an older beta, that's what upgrading is for... You see protocols change, & upgrades take these changes into account. Software is like a car, if you want it to perform, you have to maintain it. Personally, I hadn't had any problems with Gaim/MSN for a long time, since beta3 or beta4. So yeah, probably your fault.

    9. Re:Pfft. by Hatta · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Last I checked, gaim's support for file-transfers was very hit or miss. More miss than hit really. Has this changed?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    10. Re:Pfft. by bcmm · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked, MSN's file transfer sucked with every client, including the official one.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    11. Re:Pfft. by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because you and I are too lazy to write the plugin?

      This is something that really pisses me off about the fanboys, they assume a defensive stance when someone critiques their pet project. The standard "why don't YOU submit a patch?" Because I'm a user, not a programmer? Oh, I forgot, Open Source isn't for us little people, the users.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    12. Re:Pfft. by Captain+Segfault · · Score: 1

      Nowadays it consistently works if one of the two endpoints is not behind NAT, at least for AIM.

    13. Re:Pfft. by SkunkPussy · · Score: 1

      I gave up at beta 2. As I said, it was something like 6 months ago.

      --
      SURELY NOT!!!!!
    14. Re:Pfft. by SkunkPussy · · Score: 1

      Your reading's not accurate. As I said I've not used it for about 6 months, maybe more. I'd be surprised if they HADN'T fixed it in that kind of timescale, slowness of beta releases notwithstanding.

      --
      SURELY NOT!!!!!
    15. Re:Pfft. by Hatta · · Score: 1

      So one endpoint can be behind a NAT? Nice. I'll have to give it a shot again.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    16. Re:Pfft. by SkunkPussy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The world doesn't owe you a particular feature - if you want it, write it. If you can't/won't write it, then pay someone to write it for you. If you are not prepared to do that, then quit bitching and uninstall it.

      --
      SURELY NOT!!!!!
    17. Re:Pfft. by SkunkPussy · · Score: 1

      In my experience with GAIM (from behind NAT and I stopped using it after beta 2 or so), you will always get the shittest possible transfer type - i.e. the one that goes through the MSN servers and restricts you to about 2kB/s download speed.

      Nonetheless when I briefly made the mistake of installing the MSN client, it would consistently crash my router if someone sent me a file, so mayve a slower protocol isn't all bad!!

      --
      SURELY NOT!!!!!
    18. Re:Pfft. by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There is a difference between "bitching" and "feedback".

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    19. Re:Pfft. by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      The world doesn't owe you a particular feature - if you want it, write it. If you can't/won't write it, then pay someone to write it for you. If you are not prepared to do that, then quit bitching and uninstall it.

      Attitudes like this are why "proprietary" software will never die, they generally have a more friendly response to user needs.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    20. Re:Pfft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Frosty Piss said:

      Attitudes like this are why "proprietary" software will never die, they generally have a more friendly response to user needs.

      I didn't know people with such user names could actually get support from proprietary software vendors--I'd assume that they would ban you for indecency.
    21. Re:Pfft. by pclminion · · Score: 1

      The world doesn't owe you a particular feature - if you want it, write it. If you can't/won't write it, then pay someone to write it for you. If you are not prepared to do that, then quit bitching and uninstall it.

      Who writes the features is not the point. You can not seriously claim to be a full-featured chat client while you have huge holes in your feature set. Yes, it's an open source product, and nobody is obligated to contribute to it. It's still arrogant to tout a product as a major competitor to other products when it CLEARLY ISN'T.
    22. Re:Pfft. by kefler · · Score: 1

      I switched TO Gaim from Trillian at 2.0 Beta6 ... and I actually like it a lot better. When it comes to file transfers however, I feel its best to use the service which works. For example I have a set of friends on gtalk (jabber) and on MSN... but when we transfer files, we all have AIM accounts because file transfer works best there for all of us. Since all the services go through Ga--err pidgin, then it is really no trouble to do that.

    23. Re:Pfft. by JensenDied · · Score: 1

      From what I have heard is that during these secret discussions with AOL the pidgin developers had to refrain from major code changes. That is what has set back much of new features.
      Things like MSN are still back on protocol 7 (currently 14 AFAIK), partly due to the terms of AOL's compromise, and the fact that the person working on it did't finish the work last SoC.

      --

      09:F9:11:02 - 9D:74:E3:5B - D8:41:56:C5 - 63:56:88:C0

    24. Re:Pfft. by Ant+P. · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes. For one thing, feedback implies tact.

    25. Re:Pfft. by Nutria · · Score: 1
      but when we transfer files

      Innocent question from an old fogey: why use an Instant Messaging client as a File Transfer Protocol/Program?

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    26. Re:Pfft. by kefler · · Score: 1

      Well, depends on the friend and depends on the situation. We also scp to each others servers, or to some who are on my tinc network we use smb from our windows machines either to other windows machines or to a linux samba server. But sometimes you just want to drag and drop a relatively small simple file, for example an mp3 (of podsafe music of course...) How would you do it in less steps?

    27. Re:Pfft. by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Attitudes like this are why "proprietary" software will never die, they generally have a more friendly response to user needs. Of course they do - YOU'RE paying them.

      Comparatively, you just said: "This is why commercial restaurants will never die. The soup kitchen tells me to quit bitching every time I yell at them for not using enough salt. They even have the audacity to tell me to add a little salt myself!".

      This software is FREE. Use it if you want to, and if it doesn't do something, modify it, "cook" your own, or use something different. They don't owe you anything.
      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    28. Re:Pfft. by Nutria · · Score: 1
      How would you do it in less steps?

      I don't know, since I don't like and don't use IM.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    29. Re:Pfft. by kefler · · Score: 1

      Interesting you choose to post in a topic about an IM client, and ask why you would share files within an IM client, if you don't even like or use them.

      It is hard to imagine not using IM in any capacity... It is now the preferred method of communication in many large tech companies, it isn't just a "chat with friends" medium any more.

    30. Re:Pfft. by SkunkPussy · · Score: 1

      "I switched TO Gaim from Trillian at 2.0 Beta6"

      HA! I used to use trillian (free) about 4 years but it was quite buggy, so I switched to GAIM 1.x which was much more stable (if a little feature-sparse).

      I stayed with GAIM until 2.0beta 2 or 3 and then got so fed up with it being updated so infrequently (specifically taking a while to fix the MSN protocol when M$ broke it), and not even noticeably improving when they did update it, that I moved back to Trillian which in the meantime had had quite a bit of work done to it and was much more stable than it used to be (apart from the ridiculous useless and slow "mouse over a word to look up on wikipedia" feature which has a tendency to crash).

      Probably in about 2011 I'll be so pissed off with trillian that I'll switch back to pidgin, but by then everyone will have moved to jabber!

      --
      SURELY NOT!!!!!
    31. Re:Pfft. by Nutria · · Score: 1
      Interesting you choose to post in a topic about an IM client, and ask why you would share files within an IM client, if you don't even like or use them.

      That's why I was asking.

      It is hard to imagine not using IM in any capacity... It is now the preferred method of communication in many large tech companies, it isn't just a "chat with friends" medium any more.

      I don't like it because it's Instant.

      I (as a telecommuter) prefer email even to the telephone because
      1. there's a permanent record, organized by Subject, and
      2. I can sit and think about my answer (which often saves me from CLMs when my first thought when reading brainlessly stupid comments by developers and management is vituperation).

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    32. Re:Pfft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know the score, pal: if you're not developer, you're little people.

    33. Re:Pfft. by It'sYerMam · · Score: 1

      The world doesn't owe you courtesy, but generally grants it. When it receives this attitude back, though, I can see it reconsidering. It really isn't so difficult to acknowledge and accept that someone might want a feature for a piece of software, and yet be willing neither to do it themselves nor pay for it. And yet they still are perfectly welcome to express their wish for that feature! It's not that developers have to do everything that users say, but it's simply courteous to pay attention to feedback and requests, deal with them sensibly and thoughtfully, and take action if appropriate.

      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
    34. Re:Pfft. by faolan_devyn_aodfin · · Score: 1

      Heh... it's 2007 and i can't believe there is no known KDE application for connecting to the actual chat rooms in Yahoo, aim, etc. Pidgin is the only decent option for that really, although i don't like running GTK applications unless i absolutely have to. Perhaps it's time for Kopete to change their underpining library for chat handling, add this feature -- or better yet merge Kopete and Konversation in an elegant way then add support for yahoo, aim, and other chat room connections as Konversation is a wonderful piece of work for IRC users who want a great, working, modern interface. Perhaps the end project of this labour should be called Telepathy or (sighs in disgust) to keep the "K" theme consistent Telkom.

      --
      Pagan? Geek? Check out #paganism on Freenode IRC
    35. Re:Pfft. by Bronster · · Score: 1

      Network Manager Integration, that's my favourite part. Plus better status management and some other nice under-the-hood stuff.

      (but I've been tracking/running SVN and now monotone, so I've seen things as they happened - despite the stern instructions not to)

    36. Re:Pfft. by PastaLover · · Score: 1

      Who writes the features is not the point. You can not seriously claim to be a full-featured chat client while you have huge holes in your feature set.

      I'm sure many people would disagree, but for me voice/video support is not an integral part of the feature set. There's plenty of other ways out there to do voice/video. Integration is nice, yes, but to claim it is a "huge hole" in the feature set is a bit much for me. As far as I'm concerned, Pidgin's feature set is complete.

  4. Re:Pidgin? by ceeam · · Score: 1

    AIM(tm)(R)(C) part.

  5. Any point in upgrading? by rf0 · · Score: 1

    I've got a stable copy of 2.0.0.beta5 of Gaim so any point in upgrading as its stable and works. Great believe in if it ain't broke don't fix it

    1. Re:Any point in upgrading? by joshier · · Score: 0

      I briefly looked over the review, looks a fair bit different. I'm in a similar situation.

    2. Re:Any point in upgrading? by kraemate · · Score: 1

      I use 2.0beta6 which is present in Ubuntu feisty. I couldnt find any new feature in the 2.0 version by reading the review.
      I dont think i am going to upgrade any time soon.

    3. Re:Any point in upgrading? by Vector7 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sure, but by that logic you ought to be using Gaim 1.5. Basically every change to the UI in the 2.0 betas and Pidgin is a step backward. Their bizarre scheme for managing status is horrible and so confusing (and in the betas I've used, outright broken) that I've just stopped setting my status to away at all. They've added that useless Accounts menu to the buddy list, which makes the menu bar so wide that that you can't shrink the window down to a reasonable size without cutting it off (no, a 300 pixel wide window is not reasonable for presenting what is essentially a list of names under 20 characters). In the betas they did horrible things to the conversation window, with pieces misaligned and awkwardly jammed together, but that at least they appear to have cleaned up.

    4. Re:Any point in upgrading? by The+Warlock · · Score: 1

      which makes the menu bar so wide that that you can't shrink the window down to a reasonable size without cutting it off

      Do you really actually use the Help menu? I mean, really. Don't bitch about it if it isn't a problem.

      --
      I've upped my standards, so up yours.
    5. Re:Any point in upgrading? by bernywork · · Score: 2, Informative

      Works fine, looks different. Differnt icons, simpler layout. More pretty.

      --
      Curiosity was framed; ignorance killed the cat. -- Author unknown
    6. Re:Any point in upgrading? by lpangelrob · · Score: 1

      Just went from 2.0 beta 7 to 2.0.0 (in Windows)... about the only difference I can tell is that the green ball in the system tray is now a smaller green ball with a chat box. That's a good thing; a green ball is somewhat ambiguous if it's just a green ball that occasionally changes to a chat box when I get a message. The upgrade process was painless. Pidgin is a fine example of open source software... pretty slick, most things just work.

    7. Re:Any point in upgrading? by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Their bizarre scheme for managing status is horrible and so confusing (and in the betas I've used, outright broken) that I've just stopped setting my status to away at all
      Seems like a user error to me, because it works fine on both Windows and KDE for me. I think it's a much more sane scheme than Kopete has, where you have to set a message and an away status separately.
    8. Re:Any point in upgrading? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it has definitely been broken in a few of the betas, both in terms of usability and literally.

      It used to be that, when you went to make a new status message, the default status was "Available." That's not very useful when, for a large number of people who are only concerned with setting a status message when going to the "Away" status, you go to "Make new status message," type one in, and hit "Now set it," all on autopilot without making sure that you chose "Away" in the status dropdown box.

      What's the difference between "Away" and "Extended Away"? For at least one beta release, it was necessary to choose "Extended Away" to get your status marked as "Away" in an AIM protocol account.

      Finally, the most irritating thing that I've found about the new UI is inconsistent or broken formatting in text input. Every time I paste something, my subsequent messages take on the formatting of whatever I just pasted. I also have trouble with applying simple markup when bolding or italicizing input text because if I hit "Bold" or "Italic" the entire input field is formatted accordingly and not just some selected portion of the text or text entered at point. Put simply, the UI is prettier but not necessarily better. Some thought has gone into the redesign, and I hope that it will continue to be worked out.

    9. Re:Any point in upgrading? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got a stable copy of 2.0.0.beta5 of Gaim, so is there any point in upgrading as its stable and works ? Great believe r in if it ain't broke don't fix it

      Me too.

  6. Re:Pidgin? by LordSnooty · · Score: 4, Informative

    AOL got upset, as I recall (AIM vs GAIM)

  7. Popularization by Nerdfest · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was going to say 'commercialization', but I don't think that's quite right. I think this is going to be a more common occurrence, with open source project looking beyond simple functionality to usability, appearance, etc, as it does help grab more users, especially in the non-Linux crowd. As long as improving the usability doesn't actually damage the raw functionality, I'm all for it.

    1. Re:Popularization by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah ... the name changes sometimes help as well. Gimp? Great piece of software, but in dire need of a new name. There's probably other examples too ...

    2. Re:Popularization by garcia · · Score: 1

      I think this is going to be a more common occurrence, with open source project looking beyond simple functionality to usability, appearance, etc, as it does help grab more users, especially in the non-Linux crowd.

      I haven't used GAIM since I was running Linux solely back in the day (prior to 2002) and now that I use bitlbee I don't have any GUI client. Anyway, back on topic, my co-worker (who's not a Linux geek) wanted a client to do multiple IM platforms as he uses it to communicate with prospective students and heard about the new Pidgin release.

      I hadn't heard about it until he mentioned it and said "it used to be called GAIM," and then mentioned that it was starting to install. I came back up to his area about 3 hours later and he said, "I uninstalled it, I hated the UI."

      So I guess while it may appeal to the GAIM using Linux group it probably won't make any mass converts from the previous clients that are already out there, especially those that are using the AOL client like my co-worker.

    3. Re:Popularization by Zebedeu · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're right. If your coworker didn't like it, then they should just scrap the entire project.

    4. Re:Popularization by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I really don't like the UI on GAIM, at least last time I tried it. I prefer Kopete much better. And trying to move somebody who isn't a geek from the pretty colours of MSN to the look of GAIM can be pretty hard. But what other choices are available for windows users who want to use a multi-protocol instant messenger. I just hope Kopete for KDE4 is available for windows. That would be a really nice replacement for msn, and all the other instant messengers I need to use.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:Popularization by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Miranda IM is pretty lightweight, but can be made to be very slick looking if you want it to be via the $foo million plugins for it. It's also OSS, but windows only.

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    6. Re:Popularization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I guess while it may appeal to the GAIM using Linux group it probably won't make any mass converts from the previous clients that are already out there, especially those that are using the AOL client like my co-worker.

      Good god.. Someone actually prefers the official AOL client over Gaim/Pidgin??!?? I mean, Pidgin isn't all that great in the UI department (good enough for me, its a freakin chat client, who cares?), but AOL's AIM is just scary.

      I've used the official AIM in the past (modding it to exclude the ads), but it just got worse and worse with every release. I can't imagine how someone would prefer it over Pidgin.

    7. Re:Popularization by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 1

      There's also Trillian http://www.ceruleanstudios.com/, which is pretty but not OSS. Basic version if free, but you pay for a "pro" version if you want advanced features. I used it for a few years but switched to Miranda http://www.miranda-im.org/, which as the parent has noted is OSS, but Windows only. It is customizable to a ridiculous degree but works great right out of the box. I currently use it for AIM, ICQ, GTalk, YIM, Sametime and IRC.

      I tried GAIM a couple years ago but hated the GUI too much to look at it every day. I'll take another look at it now.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    8. Re:Popularization by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      I know about Trillian, but it's very sluggish, and absolutley fails to adhere to any desktop standards in Windows (weird toolkit, feels completely out-of-place, etc.). Pidgin's GUI is pretty nice IMHO, and (considering I use Clearlooks in Windows) fits in pretty well.

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    9. Re:Popularization by SkunkPussy · · Score: 1

      It was funny though!

      --
      SURELY NOT!!!!!
    10. Re:Popularization by mixmasta · · Score: 1

      Ugggh, I despise the fischer-price UI of msn messenger. Gaim could be a little more fun, but it is definitely better than the steaming pile of shit that is msn messenger.

      --
      #6495ED - cornflower blue
    11. Re:Popularization by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I think it's more like "maturation". There's a recognition that functionality isn't as valuable when usability is poor, and that appearance matters. GAIM/Pidgin is fairly feature-complete for what a lot of people want out of an IM client (for me, I just want IM), and so it makes sense to invest a little time into making it pleasant to use as well.

    12. Re:Popularization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I came back up to his area about 3 hours later and he said, "I uninstalled it, I hated the UI."

      Patience cowboy. Can someone really judge a product after 3 hours (with passive usage) to get used to a new UI?

      The Pidgin UI is worlds better then the AIM or YIM UI. I'm sure there are better UIs out there, but Pidgin is good enough for me.

    13. Re:Popularization by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      If it looks anything like what the beta looked like, then yes I agree whole-heartedly.

      http://schend.net/images/screenshots/gaim_2_is_ugl y.png
      http://schend.net/images/screenshots/gaim_2_is_bug gy.png

      I had a terrible experience with it.

    14. Re:Popularization by Khaed · · Score: 1

      I used to use Trillian, but stopped because the free version didn't have unicode support, and almost every other client did, yet Trillian never updated the free version. This was a few years ago, so I don't know if they've changed it. But every time someone copied from a webpage that had characters Trillian didn't support I wanted to break something.

      I've been using GAIM(now Pidgin), what about the GUI was so bad? I'm honestly curious, not trying to sound like a fan boy. I know it's pretty ugly in Windows (or was last I looked), but then, F/OSS programs aren't usually known for being pretty. (There are exceptions, but gah, OO.o comes to mind as not pretty.)

    15. Re:Popularization by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Looks like a typical GNOME program using a horribly outdated GTK+ engine. Of course, GTK+ does not belong on Windows (or anywhere in my opinion), so that's why it looks so ugly.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  8. Already using it, much better than gaim. by Uniquitous · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Kudos to the developers, pidgin is a much less clunky interface compared to gaim.

    1. Re:Already using it, much better than gaim. by kraemate · · Score: 1

      Well yeah, the previous gaim UI sucked big time. They have made some improvements, but not enough to qualify a separate version! This is more like 1.5.x.y

    2. Re:Already using it, much better than gaim. by SimGuy · · Score: 1

      A lot of people haven't realized that Pidgin's versioning scheme is actually based upon the API (programming interface). If it breaks binary/API compatibility with a previous release, the major version number has to be incremented. This is what happened when the project went 1.0.0 (it was decided that a new versioning scheme was needed.) There was confusion at that time as well, thinking "Gaim is finally considered stable." It's all about whether you can (theoretically) just plop in a new version of the library and have it still be able to run with plugins/UIs.

      There were specific goals for this API/ABI breakage cycle, besides the AOL settlement, which included a vast rewrite of the status (away message, etc) system and its UI, and the completion of the core and UI split, which could not have been easily done without a major version bump. Of course, the API was completely broken by the rename of the internal functions to purple/pidgin/finch. The next major version bump may be relatively (less than 2 years) soon, depending upon how quickly the developers get together the API changing projects they're planning.

      Voice support, however, could realistically be in 2.1.0 or 2.2.0 if it doesn't break API and merely adds new functions. I am certainly not promising that, so DON'T MISQUOTE ME. :P

      --
      I don't care, but don't let that stop you from trying to tell me anyway.
    3. Re:Already using it, much better than gaim. by __NR_kill · · Score: 1

      To what good is it when it still can't ignore people on AIM? Everybody who has your ICQ number may write to you any moment they want.

    4. Re:Already using it, much better than gaim. by Bronster · · Score: 1

      That's libpurple to you, ta muchly.

  9. Psychic mode by Chang · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does anybody know what the "Display Notification Message in Conversations" option in psychic mode does?

    Do that let people know somehow that you are using psychic mode?

    I've been using Pidgin (gaim) for a long time but I just turned that option on today.

    1. Re:Psychic mode by DeusInnomen · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Psychic mode feature opens an IM window as soon as you get notification that the remote user is typing. So, you get an empty window with a typing notification before you actually receive an IM. Apparently, it works with the AIM, ICQ, Jabber, Sametime and Yahoo protocols.

    2. Re:Psychic mode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      MSN too. The empty message window says something along the lines "You feel a disturbance in the force."

    3. Re:Psychic mode by neaorin · · Score: 1

      This was in the 2.0 betas too. I've annoyed many a friend with it ;)

    4. Re:Psychic mode by Anonymous+Drunkard · · Score: 1

      I don't know whether ICQ does this or not (it's been at least 8 years since I've used a standalone ICQ client), but years ago if you had a multiuser chat, each user had the option of seeing the conversation either "chat room" style (like IRC), or with each user visible in their own panel. When in panel mode, you could see your chatmates typing live - as in talk or ytalk. Everything they typed, you saw as it happened - mistakes, corrections, everything.

      That was fun, in a morbid sort of way...

    5. Re:Psychic mode by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Really? Just enough time to say, "Hi!"?

    6. Re:Psychic mode by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      i bet with a buddy pounce setting you could REALLY mess with someones head

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    7. Re:Psychic mode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not funny, informative!! It actually does that!!

    8. Re:Psychic mode by Bronster · · Score: 1

      Almost always, yes. I can say "hi" before they finish typing whatever they wanted to say.

  10. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  11. Jabber and IRC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally I find better clients for both Jabber and IRC. It just doesn't feel right in Gajim (or Pidgin as it's named now). Compare gajim at http://www.gajim.org/ (jabber client) to Pidgin's Jabber features and you'll see. Minus point for gajim is it's extreme memory usage and CPU usage. IRC in Gajim felt just wrong. X-Chat does a lot better job.

    Please note I haven't used Pidgin.. only these CVS dumps Ubuntu ships as stable versions of Gajim.

    1. Re:Jabber and IRC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gajim != Gaim

    2. Re:Jabber and IRC by lanc · · Score: 1

      now come on, stop splitting hairs, that's a slippery slope, you don't take the next thing you'll know is that you want him to read.

      --
      "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they attack you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi
  12. Features, features... by ChTh · · Score: 0

    But will it download my ICQ-contacts off the servers, that I added a long time ago with libicq2000 which bypassed the pointless authorization steps, or will I have to bug everyone with requests? (And be bugged by others for that matter.) First thing I look for in an IM-client.

    1. Re:Features, features... by Niznaika · · Score: 0
      Thank you slashdot for the fragged server. For whom may concern, regarding the VV support, quoted from the pidgin track:

      04/12/07 12:31:05 changed by hbons
      There should be VV soon, if only to stop all the whining.
  13. pidgin by trollzor · · Score: 0

    Great, but where is all the VoiP and video work we were promised? There was some flamewar between gaim-vv people and the gaim/pidgin lead dev with people claiming he was working in google's interests and ignoring all their work. I don't know what the situation is there and who is at fault (maybe gaim-vv had a crap design/structure and he's legitimately not using that). What I do know is that there is gtalk video calling on the N800 [ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XE2fhlh3hJs ] which is Maemo based and that this hasn't found its way back to desktop linux. Skype are dragging their feet for almost a year after they promised video for linux and their latest alpha (1.4) doesn't even include it. Ekiga has good video, but the sound has never worked to anything remotely resembling a conversation for me.

    So the state of linux video calling sucks pretty hard, maybe we get skype video in 6 months, maybe ekiga fix their sound quality, and maybe the gtalk work on the N800 finds its way into the next pidgin....

    One thing I do know is that patents and people using proprietary standards are at the root of many of these problems, as the codec skype is using is licenced from some other company, not sure about the gtalk video but why else would they be dragging their feet? And ekiga certainly seems to need some kind of injection of technology, because the stuff they are using now simply does not seem to work.

    Here's hoping google invests a little more in Pidgin because it sounds like the main dev is struggling (for whatever reasons) to meet expectations that 2.0 would have video and voice.

    1. Re:pidgin by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2, Informative

      See past news articles regarding GAIM vs. AOL lawsuits - Development pace (and scope) was slowed down significantly due to the lawsuit.

      In essence, per their lawyers' advice, the developers agreed not to make any major releases while negotiations were going on.

      As to why there wasn't too much progress in their betas - if there had been significant progress other than a UI overhaul and bugfixes, AOL would likely have claimed that their "betas" were really releases that were only being called betas as a loophole.

      The trademark lawsuit has been fully resolved, so what matters is where things go in the future, and I suspect we'll be seeing a lot of progress now. I wouldn't be surprised if the developers have been working on voice/video support in a seperate codebase somewhere but keeping it quiet until the lawsuits were resolved.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    2. Re:pidgin by trollzor · · Score: 0

      Ah cheers for the heads up, I knew about the lawsuit, but didn't realise it was holding releases up. Nice prime UID btw.

  14. SIP? by Monoman · · Score: 1

    I didn't see SIP support in my scan of the article. I currently have that ability with Trillian via a free 3rd party plugin to use SIP to connect to my employer's MS LiveCommunications server.

    I am not sure if that is a must have for me so I will give the new version a try.

    --
    Keep the Classic Slashdot.
    1. Re:SIP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SIP/SIMPLE support has been added after a Summer of Code project implemented it.

    2. Re:SIP? by Bytefreak · · Score: 4, Informative
      SIP Support is there as of last year, won't help much as as MS have used non standard extensions for LCS....Happily there's a guy working on a gaim plugin for LCS which uses a modified version of the SIP/Simple code:

      http://fixxxer.cc/blog-en/?cat=9

      It's still in the early stages, but it's getting there and has the advantage of being cross-platform and open-source, hoping I can use it to talk to our internal IM network from my linux box.

  15. Technobabble by vjmurphy · · Score: 5, Funny

    "use the new D-Bus bindings with Python to make Pidgin's status system send updates to Twitter"

    Or you could cross-connect the Bullshittean Field Emitter to the Warp Core Ejector using quasi-bosonic tachyon particles.

    Any anyhow, shouldn't the Python, having been attracted by the Twitter, eat the Pidgin?

    --
    Vincent J. Murphy
    Spandex Justice
    1. Re:Technobabble by deniable · · Score: 1

      It's obviously Enterprise grade software.

      You forgot to modulate. Modulation is everything. :)

  16. pidgin-encryption? by shr3k · · Score: 3, Informative

    It seems everytime GAIM had a new version, GAIM-Encryption seemed to always be there with a new release of their plugin to work with it. But now that they made all these changes to Pidgin, I don't think Gaim-Encryption has followed suit. Has anyone been able to get the encryption plugin working with Pidgin? The installer for 3.0beta8 doesn't recognize Pidgin and, despite forcing an install, Pidgin won't pick up on the encryption plugin.

    I'd say that's the only thing keeping me from embracing Pidgin at the moment. Otherwise, the new UI looks nice.

    1. Re:pidgin-encryption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See this thread on gaim-encryption's help forum for the gaim-encryption port for Pidgin:

      http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=1 725921&forum_id=194059 (pidgin-encryption-3.0beta9.exe)

    2. Re:pidgin-encryption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      Off-the-recording messaging is better.

      How is this different from the gaim-encryption plugin?
      The gaim-encryption plugin provides encryption and authentication, but not deniability or perfect forward secrecy.
    3. Re:pidgin-encryption? by caseih · · Score: 1

      I don't know of anyone who uses Gaim-Encryption these days. Instead the standard is OTR (off-the-record) which is supported by many IM clients on many platforms. Consider switching to it.

    4. Re:pidgin-encryption? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Good point. And they don't have a plugin yet either. Had a lot of trouble during the 2.0 betas, too, since each new beta seemed to break the API all over again.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  17. Re:Pidgin? by borizz · · Score: 1

    I like it. There are more than enough gsomething or ksomething applications out there.

  18. The interface is terrible! by gpinzone · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is supposed to be a Trillian killer? The interface is horrible! I'm not even talking about the ability to "skin" the application. Simple things like notifying the user if he/she receives mail is ridiculous the way it's implemented.

    1. Re:The interface is terrible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, there are other operating systems out there than Microsoft's.

    2. Re:The interface is terrible! by spikeb · · Score: 1

      Have you ever even USED trillian? interface wise, it's a piece of shit

    3. Re:The interface is terrible! by khristian · · Score: 1

      Except for a few strange things (like the "Image too large for jabber" error message that could say something more and had me Goggleing for clues), I find the Pidgin 2.0 (mine is beta6) much better than the previous in usability.
      And one thing I've been missing in Linux was a GTalk-like Gmail notifier, which was quite well done by Pidgin.
      Maybe it's just me, but I liked it.

      --
      http://derkosak.blogspot.com - That's a blog.
    4. Re:The interface is terrible! by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      I have never heard anyone say it is supposed to be a trillian killer.

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    5. Re:The interface is terrible! by pebs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is supposed to be a Trillian killer? The interface is horrible! I'm not even talking about the ability to "skin" the application. Simple things like notifying the user if he/she receives mail is ridiculous the way it's implemented.

      As the other guy said, who is calling this a Trillian killer?

      In any case, Trillian already killed itself by not including Jabber support in the free version. (And who is going to pay for that garbage anyway?)

      Of course those of us who don't run Windows don't give a shit about Trillian. And even those of us who do, Trillian is still the shittier option because you can't use the free version with Google Talk.

      --
      #!/
    6. Re:The interface is terrible! by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      I thought it supported Jabber? Then again, I haven't used Trillian since version 0.60something...

    7. Re:The interface is terrible! by pebs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I thought it supported Jabber? Then again, I haven't used Trillian since version 0.60something...

      The Pro version does support Jabber, which costs $25.

      --
      #!/
    8. Re:The interface is terrible! by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      I thought it supported Jabber? Then again, I haven't used Trillian since version 0.60something...

      The Pro version does support Jabber, which costs $25. And AOL threatens GAIM for name while there is a company selling/getting ads on closed source instant messenger connecting to their network.
  19. Very nice UI by Lisandro · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I like the new UI a lot - functionally, Pidgin is the same as the earlier Gaim 2.0 betas with a sleeker look. It also seems a bit more responsive, IMHO. The Pidgin guys have done a great job, IMHO.

    PS: Will we ever get the stock emoticons for each IM protocol back again? The default ones stocked with Pidgin are nice, but i always preferred to see the "original" ones for each client.

    1. Re:Very nice UI by Lunar_Lamp · · Score: 1

      I think they were removed due to concerns about licensing, so I suspect unless the licences for the various clients are altered (or just their emoticons), we won't be getting them. It would be nice though, I agree.

    2. Re:Very nice UI by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      You mean they changed the protocol icons between the 2.0 betas and the final 2.0 release? Please tell me there's a way to change them back.

    3. Re:Very nice UI by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      I migrated from Gaim 2.0.6b to Pidgin 2.0.7b yesterday, and yes, the original emoticons for each protocol are no longer there - there's a very nice set of custom ones (supporting most of the MSN set) though. I'd still prefer the original ones... i guess a third-party package will appear sooner or later.

    4. Re:Very nice UI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can add smiley themes through preferences and the original for each client are available. Don't remember where I got mine, but Google should help you find them. My smiley theme is just called "default" attributed to "various", so that's not much help. Pretty sure I dl'd them from sourceforge.

    5. Re:Very nice UI by metalzelot · · Score: 1

      It does not have to do anything with licensing things. They removed the icons for each protocol because the developer thing that it actually is not important to see which user uses which protocol. The only thing which matters is to chat with them. But you can still see the protocol icon if you hover the buddy. I think this is definitively a step back, but on the other hand I don't care too much for the icons. At least it looks better now.

  20. 27MB install for a IM program? by Faw · · Score: 1

    Sweet Zombie Jesus!!!

    1. Re:27MB install for a IM program? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      What are you smoking dude ?
      The install with GTK+ is ~11MB, without GTK+ is 5...

    2. Re:27MB install for a IM program? by Curtman · · Score: 3, Informative

      What did you download? One of these ?

      The Windows installer which includes Gtk+ is 11MB, and the one without is 5.5MB. Or it should be anyway. I don't see anything that is 27MB.

    3. Re:27MB install for a IM program? by Evil+Cretin · · Score: 1, Informative

      I'm sure you'd love Lotus Sametime then. It's a ~90MB install file and takes a good 25 minutes to install...

      --
      "A deadlock has been reached. One task must die. We must now choose between murder and suicide."
    4. Re:27MB install for a IM program? by metamatic · · Score: 1

      That's nothing. IBM Lotus Sametime is 134MB on disk, and over a quarter GB of RAM.

      Apparently users don't care about memory usage for IM software.

      (Opinions mine, not necessarily IBM's.)

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    5. Re:27MB install for a IM program? by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 2, Informative

      no, that's the size of the installer. now run that installer and read how much disk space it says is required. "dude".

      --
      (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
    6. Re:27MB install for a IM program? by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Hmm, Kopete is only 761 kB (the executable with shared libraries ;). That's not good if Gaim^WPidgin uses that much space...

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    7. Re:27MB install for a IM program? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Up until very recently, Windows Live Messenger took more space than that in memory.

      In any case, with Pidgin, you're installing GTK, which is a massive programming toolkit, an english language word list, the IM client itself, graphics for all the protocols and lots of plugins. 27MB sounds very lean to me. Of course, if you used a Linux distro, you would probably already have had GTK, so that would have saved a significant part of that space.

  21. They should learn form adium by simm1701 · · Score: 1

    Ok Adium uses libgaim (or libpidgin now I presume) but the interface is so much nicer.

    It looks better, is easier to use and to configure - I much prefered using it - sadly I no longer have a mac and Adium is only on OSX - I sincerely wish it would be ported to linux!!

    --
    $_="Slashdotter";$syn="OTT";s;..;;;sub _{print shift||$_};s!ash!Perl !;s=$syn=ack=i;tr+LLEd+BLAH+;_"Just Another ";_
    1. Re:They should learn form adium by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Adium has a nice interface, but it's also quite resource hungry (about on par with Thunderbird). I suspect that's because of the fancy UI.

      Oh, and it's a PITA to get Adium to just give you a plain text representation of what's being written. You have to go to their extension website and hunt for half an hour until you find a theme that is somewhat ergonomic.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    2. Re:They should learn form adium by Koohoolinn · · Score: 1

      Ok Adium uses libgaim (or libpidgin now I presume)
      Actually, it's now called libpurple.
      --
      Deze sig is in 't Nederlands geschreven.
    3. Re:They should learn form adium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      In Adium:

      Preferences -> Messages. Then choose "minimal_mod" for the "Message Style".

      Less than a minute.

    4. Re:They should learn form adium by miscz · · Score: 1

      Adium looks better but it doesn't have better interface. It took me ages to find how to disable spellcheck, I was pretty amazed with Adium at first but then it became irritating.

  22. Re:Pidgin? by syntaxglitch · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So call it GChat, or NinjaChat, or FreakinSweetChat, or something else! But Pidgin?
    It sounds like a jungle midget headhunter. Try looking it up in a dictionary and considering why it might be an appropriate name. It's actually a fairly witty choice, just apparently outside the working vocabulary of most slashdotters.
  23. Re:Pidgin? by Goaway · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps you need to get some exercise for your vocabulary of the English language, so that these new and unfamiliar words do not frighten you so much.

  24. Slashdotted by Brainix · · Score: 2, Informative

    Uh oh. The Pidgin server seems to be hammered, but you can still download it from its SourceForge page.

    --
    Raj Against the Machine! http://social-butterfly.appspot.com/
  25. Re:Pidgin? by owlnation · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Try looking it up in a dictionary and considering why it might be an appropriate name. It's actually a fairly witty choice, just apparently outside the working vocabulary of most slashdotters.
    Also handy for beating The Vulture Squadron - Dick Dastardly over at Yahoo, Muttley at AOL, Zilly at Skype, and Klunk at MS.
  26. My Analysis by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've always rather liked GAIM and it has been a while since there have been real improvements, so I thought I'd take a look and see how far they've managed to come.

    I liked

    • Interface looks better, if not perfect.
    • Nicer plug-in system

    I disliked:

    • No Mac OS X support
    • No built in encryption or support for OTR
    • No support for voice or video.

    One thing that annoys me is they took the time to add spell checking for both OS's. I love having spell checking in my IM client, but it is not a function that every single program should have to supply by itself. I'm already running a spell checker in my text editor and my layout application and my e-mail client, and pretty much everything else. This is one of several functions that should be provided at the OS level to all applications that want it, not by each application individually. Will they waste time adding grammar checking next? How about translations between languages? What about dictionary/thesaurus/encyclopedia lookups?

    Calling all Windows and Linux developers. It is time to catch up and make universal services a built in function of the OS so developers stop wasting time re-implementing things and concentrate on features specific to their program, like encryption and VoIP support.

    1. Re:My Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For the dislikes:
      • Adium exists for the Mac.
      • Encryption is not something that should be built in for multi protocol IM.
      • VV will come... if only for shutting the detractors up, like a slashdotter already quoted from the developers
      • Spellcheck is not built in. What is built in is the support for aspell, a multiplatform oss app. So nobody neglected the "important" things for it.
    2. Re:My Analysis by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Adium exists for the Mac.

      Yeah, along with other programs. That's not really relevant though for those of us working on multiple OS's. Lack of OS X support means 90% of the time, I would not even consider using this.

      Encryption is not something that should be built in for multi protocol IM.

      Why would you think that? I'd rather have one encryption system and set of keys, which I can encapsulate within any program, than one encryption system and set of keys for each protocol. Is it so hard to integrate something like Off The Record which provides encryption for a variety of IM protocols and clients?

      Spellcheck is not built in. What is built in is the support for aspell, a multiplatform oss app. So nobody neglected the "important" things for it.

      Well, I imagine it took a small amount of work to make that happen, but the point is taken. I mostly mention this because the current design of Windows and Linux has fallen so far behind in this regard and I hope by being a little vocal about it I can make more users and developers aware of what we are all missing on those OS's. But that is truly a gripe with Linux and Windows, not with the Pidgin project.

    3. Re:My Analysis by Niznaika · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yeah, along with other programs. That's not really relevant though for those of us working on multiple OS's. Lack of OS X support means 90% of the time, I would not even consider using this. So you want an ugly GTK+ interface vs. Cocoa (or whatever the OSX is using) ? They are both built on the libpurple library, there is no point in allocating valuable resources for porting something ugly for OSX instead of supporting the Adium guys. On the other hand maybe Finch (the text client for libpurple) may work on OSX. :D

      Why would you think that? I'd rather have one encryption system and set of keys, which I can encapsulate within any program, than one encryption system and set of keys for each protocol. Is it so hard to integrate something like Off The Record which provides encryption for a variety of IM protocols and clients? Well, if you are talking about encapsulating with any program, it means that your gripe is not with the pidgin devs.

      Cheers.
    4. Re:My Analysis by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      So you want an ugly GTK+ interface vs. Cocoa (or whatever the OSX is using) ?

      Why do you assume multi-platform programs would use the same UI? Does AOL instant messenger on Mac and Windows use the same UI?

      Well, if you are talking about encapsulating with any program, it means that your gripe is not with the pidgin devs.

      Yes it is. It is functionality that should be built in to the chat client. I don't want to have to go hunting for a plug-in or run my own proxy server. I want to double click on the icon and and have it just plain work out of the box. I want it to be used by default by all users of the client where it is supported on both ends, so that I don't have to talk people through setting it up on their end when I'm chatting with co-workers about work. Encryption should be the default for IM and it does not and should not matter which protocol you are using.

    5. Re:My Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Regarding your anger of the spelling checker... don't they use GTKspell to do that? http://gtkspell.sourceforge.net/

      I remember when I was new to linux, in April 2005, I had to install GAIM on mandrake. It failed due to dependency problems, and the package missing was gtkspell.
      I remember it very well.

      So, they are not wasting time writing a spell checker. They used an existing one: GTKSPELL.

    6. Re:My Analysis by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      GTKSpell works on Windows? They probably wasted a small amount of time integrating these, but you're right, probably not a whole lot because of reuse of other, open code.

    7. Re:My Analysis by DeepHurtn! · · Score: 1

      Just an FYI: KDE already provides spiffy central spellchecking, available for apps to take advantage of. Konqueror is quite happily spellchecking the contents of this comment field as I type it, for example (using the same checker/dictionary that, say, my e-mail client does).

    8. Re:My Analysis by pebs · · Score: 1

      Mac version:

      http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/package.php/gaim

      Or did you mean for it to actually act like a Mac app?

      --
      #!/
    9. Re:My Analysis by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Just an FYI: KDE already provides spiffy central spellchecking, available for apps to take advantage of.

      Yeah, that is about halfway there, but KParts (the feature you're talking about) still doesn't cut it because the application developer specifically has to know about and include the feature (spell checking for example) before it becomes accessible to the user.

      For example, KDE and OS X both ship with a spellchecking service. In KDE developers can opt to include it in their apps. With OS X, unless the develop uses some funky non-standard API for text, it simply works. Now I have a Kubuntu desktop and an OS X desktop in front of me right now and spellchecking works fine in the included IM clients (Kopete and iChat). What about grammar checking? Neither ships with a built in grammar checker that works with the IM client. With OS X, I just downloaded a third party one and it applies to ichat. With Kopete I have to copy and paste between it and an app that does support that feature. What about other features? With OS X, services can also be offered by other programs. For example, I have a program that has the ability to calculate checksums, and it offers that ability to everything else, so if I wanted (for some reason) to calculate the checksum of some text sent via IM, I could. So maybe you don't care about checksums, or grammar checking. Is there any functions you do care about? Who knows better which functions you will use, you or the application developer? I have some language services to translate between English and German, which is useful for looking at some German Websites, and chatting with German clients. I have a service that automatically takes a URL or book info and formats it into a bibliography reference. I have a service that just looks at text and provides a character/word/paragraph count. The people who coded my chat client would probably never have considered that I would want those functions and even if they knew they existed would not take the time to add them into an IM client or my text editor, or my browser.

      The ability for applications and services to easily share functionality with no knowledge or work on the part of the application developer whose application will be using the the functionality is, in my opinion, one of the most overlooked features of OS X and one reason I would have a hard time using Linux or Windows as my primary workstation these days.

      Implementing spell checking as a standard library, ala KParts is a step in the right direction, but it is not enough anymore.

    10. Re:My Analysis by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      That is GAIM, version 1.5 of this project. We're talking about Pidgen, version 2.0 of the same. I don't think there is any version of Pidgen yet available. In any case, yeah it would be nice if it supported all three major desktop OS's with their native UIs.

    11. Re:My Analysis by DeepHurtn! · · Score: 1
      Good points! I knew about the need for a given app to know to use a KPart (since, for example, non-KDE apps can't make use of spellchecking), but hadn't realized how transparent OS X's ability to share functionality was. Sounds like neat stuff.

      By the way, your reference-formatting service sounds incredibly handy!

      Tschüss,

      -dh

    12. Re:My Analysis by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      >like encryption and VoIP support.

      The gaim/pidgin developers have stated that they refuse to use any encryption that is vulnerable to man-in-middle attacks and encryption that cannot verify the identity of the remote user. So in other words, until there is a worldwide standard for public key cryptography they wont do it at all, which is one of the many reasons to avoid this project.

    13. Re:My Analysis by Coryoth · · Score: 1

      Why do you assume multi-platform programs would use the same UI? Does AOL instant messenger on Mac and Windows use the same UI? Then think of Adium as the OS X UI. Is it that bad that it has a different name? Ultimately they're using the same core libraries, so at heart they're the same, they just have different UIs.
    14. Re:My Analysis by pebs · · Score: 1

      That is GAIM, version 1.5 of this project. We're talking about Pidgen, version 2.0 of the same. I don't think there is any version of Pidgen yet available. In any case, yeah it would be nice if it supported all three major desktop OS's with their native UIs.

      Ah, my bad. Though I don't see why you can't build Pidgin on the Mac (if someone hasn't already). The wiki page says it runs on the Mac (in X11 of course).

      Expecting the Gaim developers to write native UI's would be a bit much considering its a GTK+ app and that is what the developers' backgrounds probably are in (as well as the existing codebase). GTK+ for Windows works great and is integrated well, that's why Pidgin in Windows works well and I see no reason to make that native when it looks and acts completely like a native app. OS X is different enough that what you'd really need is a GTK+ version that is specifically integrated with OS X's native GUI (rather than X11). That would be nice, but is no small undertaking.

      OS X is different enough that its just rare that you have a cross-platform app that is well-integrated and behaves like a normal native OS X app. I mean look at Firefox, it took them quite a while to get it to where it is on OS X, and it still kinda sucks. And no, I don't want to use Camino (or Safari), I want to use Firefox.

      --
      #!/
    15. Re:My Analysis by dave1g · · Score: 1

      Adium is the mac OS X native client.

      There are plugins for OTR/encryption but I hear those are broken at the moment.

      I agree on the voice/video, they promised it for 2.0 but I'm going to give them some slack their aol legal dispute excuse seems to be genuine

  27. Proxy problems by Bwian_of_Nazareth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have downloaded and installed Pidgin and it looks nice and all, but it does not seem able to tunnel through our proxy. So far the only IM that succeeds is Miranda which I hate soooo much. :)
    The settings that work in Miranda are "" proxy type and proxy name, with no authorisation. No combination of HTTP, SOCKS4 or SOCKS5 with or without my account credentials seems to work in Pidgin. Which is a pity.

    1. Re:Proxy problems by Bwian_of_Nazareth · · Score: 1

      I did hit "Preview" but screwed up nevertheless. :-) The proxy type in Miranda is <mixed>.

    2. Re:Proxy problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So use a proxifier/soxifier like SocksCap, tsocks, or many others available. It will wrap your application in a proxy and tunnel all the traffic transparently. You don't have to rely on individual application proxy support.

    3. Re:Proxy problems by metalzelot · · Score: 1

      Actually I'm also using a proxy but I don't have to tell Pidgin anything about it. On the Network tab of the preferences I've selected the following: STUN server: [none] Autodetect IP address: [checked] Manuall specify range of ports to listen on: [unchecked] you have to open / tunnel all the ports for the protocols you're using. Proxy type: [No proxy] Hope that helps.

  28. Supports MSN Offline messages? by Robmonster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I find the main MSN clients Offline Message mechanism very handy when I want to ping a message over to a friend and be sure they get it the next time they login.

    Does this new release suport this? GAIM 2 didn't.

    --
    I have no sig yet I must scream.
    1. Re:Supports MSN Offline messages? by thaig · · Score: 2, Informative

      Select Tools->Buddy pounce.

      Your client must be left on and running for this to work. It has been in GAIM for a while now.

      --
      This is all just my personal opinion.
    2. Re:Supports MSN Offline messages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's not the same thing. Offline messages are stored serverside and are received regardless of the sender's status.

    3. Re:Supports MSN Offline messages? by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      There is, however, a new plugin which emulates offline message storing by using buddy pounce. I haven't tried it yet, but I would expect that it works just as well outside of the instances where neither of you are online at the same time.

    4. Re:Supports MSN Offline messages? by dave1g · · Score: 1

      plugins->offline message emulation... I think you need gaim open for it to work though.

      better than nothing though :-)

  29. all complain by aled · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So many complains about GAIM/PIDGIN and still the site is slashdotted.

    --

    "I think this line is mostly filler"
    1. Re:all complain by moranar · · Score: 1

      The site is not slashdotted, nor digged. It was down before the news got to both sites.

      It might be a preemptive shutdown? Servers now cower before the slashdotting comes? Not fair!

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea!"
      Gandhi, about Internet Security
    2. Re:all complain by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

      It might be a preemptive shutdown? Servers now cower before the slashdotting comes? Not fair!

      SDoS! Self-inflicted Denial of Service! Brilliant!

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    3. Re:all complain by aled · · Score: 1

      So in order to avoid a DoS attack we need to shutdown every server. I would tell this great technique to everyone but strangely the IM server is down...

      --

      "I think this line is mostly filler"
  30. That gives me an idea by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 4, Funny

    AOL got upset, as I recall (AIM vs GAIM)

    I'm getting a bunch of guys together, we're gonna sue all the women for trademark infringement. And don't get me started on the blatant discrimination of the Hershey bar.

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
  31. Jabber/XMPP File Transfer by hey · · Score: 1

    That's the feature I want!!!
    (MSN is laughing at us.)

    1. Re:Jabber/XMPP File Transfer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /Scruffy

        Second.

      /Scruffy off

        I heard it kinda-sorta worked for a while, but I never managed to get it to do anything.
      It'e be nice if some kind developer with some free time took pity on us Jabber users and implemented that part of the spec.

  32. Kill pidgin by diegocgteleline.es · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What I was interested in, was connecting to GTalk for VoIP. That isn't supported right now.

    And that's after two years of development. It's laughable that slashdot needs to quote "smooth-scroll" and "new icons" as a major "feature".

    Seriously, this is crazy. There's no webcam support - something that messenger has been doing since forever, and it's a major feature for IM. And no VOIP. That's why I keep using kopete, even if it's a memory pig: At least I do have MSN webcam support. It's sad that OSS IM's are in a so poor state.

    1. Re:Kill pidgin by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you've been reading up on the whole Gaim/Pidgin thing, you'll notice their lawyers told them to not make any drastic changes until they resolved the dispute. Since that's over with, I'd expect to see a whole bunch of new shiny things in the next few months.

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    2. Re:Kill pidgin by beowulf01 · · Score: 0

      Web cam support? Who the heck wants to watch people sitting around in their underwear?

      Oh, wait...

    3. Re:Kill pidgin by shenanigans · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but these peope write code for free. If you really want a feature, why don't you go write it yourself? I really don't see any reason to criticize people who have given up THEIR free time to help YOU.

    4. Re:Kill pidgin by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 1
      This, from the Ars Technica article, just blew me away...

      . . .Pidgin 2.0 is capable of competing with commercial instant messaging applications like Trillian Pro.
      Pidgin had been in development for 2 years and it's still merely "capable" of competing with Trillian, which experienced it's most recent major release 3 years ago?
      --
      People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
    5. Re:Kill pidgin by PastaLover · · Score: 1

      This, from the Ars Technica article, just blew me away...

      . . .Pidgin 2.0 is capable of competing with commercial instant messaging applications like Trillian Pro.
      Pidgin had been in development for 2 years and it's still merely "capable" of competing with Trillian, which experienced it's most recent major release 3 years ago? You misunderstood. The 2.0 branch has been in development for 2 years, but Gaim itself has existed for quite a few years more and was more or less feature complete compared to Trillian a couple of years ago. It's just that the newer versions have a better UI and probably quite a few improvements in core.
    6. Re:Kill pidgin by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 1

      You misunderstood. The 2.0 branch has been in development for 2 years, but Gaim itself has existed for quite a few years more. . .
      I know. I'm sticking with the >=2.0 is Pidgin and 2.0 is Gaim.

      Either way, my statement is still valid. According to the review, the latest release of Pidgin/Gaim is comparable to a commercial equivalent that's 3 years old. With Trillian Astra supposedly nearing beta, I don't see that as the endorsement the author apparently meant it to be.
      --
      People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
    7. Re:Kill pidgin by PastaLover · · Score: 1

      Either way, my statement is still valid. According to the review, the latest release of Pidgin/Gaim is comparable to a commercial equivalent that's 3 years old. With Trillian Astra supposedly nearing beta, I don't see that as the endorsement the author apparently meant it to be. My mistake. I personally feel most of the improvements came in the form of usability enhancements. Personally, I haven't even bothered to look at other clients since quite a couple of releases back. And even those that I have tried tended to score badly on some usability points (i.e. msn messenger). Personally I think features are much less important than solidly supporting the base IM usage...
  33. pidgin.im down? by esiminch · · Score: 0

    no success, trying to reach the website since today morning. slashdot effect or AOL sabotage?

  34. New Sounds Are Nice! by Sounder40 · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you like the new sounds in Pidgin, you can thank the artist who developed them by going to Magnatune.com and buy his album. Not just because you like the Pidgin sounds, not just because you like Indie Rock, but because you like independent music and independent music publishers like Magnatune. Lot's of good karma available by buying this one.

    --
    A clever person solves a problem, A wise person avoids it. -Einstein
    1. Re:New Sounds Are Nice! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Lot's of good karma available by buying this one.

      Sorry, I'm already at the karma kap.

      Seriously though, you don't seem to understand the word karma...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  35. Re:Pidgin? by Uniquitous · · Score: 2, Funny

    The obvious mental leap is to "pidgin" English. Given the gibberish that a lot of people run back and forth through the chat pipes, it seems like an appropriate name!

  36. Slashdotted! by ErGalvao · · Score: 1

    For those who just can't wait - like myself - since the Pidgin site was slashdotted, just go directly to Pidgin's SourceForge page @ http://sourceforge.net/projects/pidgin

    Look, ma! I've slashdotted SourceForge :D

    --
    Er Galvão Abbott - IT Consultant and Developer
  37. Most importantly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it have webcam support?

    If not, then I'm sticking with the MSN bloatware. Sigh.

  38. Re:Pidgin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That doesn't change the fact that its a ridiculous and childish sounding name for an instant messenger.

  39. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  40. But what I really want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is a plugin to support the Ctrl-1...Ctrl-Shift-8 smiley insertion. Anyone know of one I can grab to do this?

  41. I love pidgin but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Inviting someone into a chat looks very unfinished (you have to choose from a list of email addresses). Otherwise, great job.

  42. Heh, seems they have a sense of humor in configure by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 4, Funny


    checking for NSS... yes
    checking for snprintf... yes
    checking for connect... (cached) yes
    checking for me pot o' gold... no
    checking for gethostid... yes
    checking for lrand48... yes
    checking for memcpy... yes

  43. Twitter Plugin? by xxdesmus · · Score: 0

    Any kind soul want to make a quick and dirty Twitter plugin for the rest of us? Ideally I just want to be able to update send a Twit with my current away message in Pidgin... Thanks for any help guys.

  44. It doesn't support Office Communicator. :( by gosand · · Score: 1

    I wish it supported Office Communicator. I am a function-first kind of guy, and the damn client doesn't even used tabs!! It is so clunky it is painful.

    Now I have to use it at work, and use it all day. It is nice that it integrates with the Office calendars, and updates your status according to your calendar. Everyone uses it, and the ability to look people up in the directory is nice (and no dorky names, your id is your email address). But having multiple different windows up instead of just 1 kills me.

    I've looked around, but are there any decent 3rd party clients for Office Communicator?
    (and no, getting off of Communicator isn't an option. I don't think I can change the minds of the largest bank in the country.)

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:It doesn't support Office Communicator. :( by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you read above, there are some early attempts at supporting Office Communicator, but none that are very reliable or polished.

      The reason is that Microsoft bastardized their SIP/SIMPLE implementation in LCS so badly (in typical Microsoft fashion) that it won't interoperate with any software that is actually SIP/SIMPLE compliant. So lots of IM programs support SIP/SIMPLE, but to talk to MS LCS, they have to break their implementation so badly that they won't talk to anything else!

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  45. Re:Pidgin? by Goaway · · Score: 1

    Do children where you live really use the word "pidgin" a lot?

  46. AOL/AIM woes by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

    Every time I try to send a message in AIM, i get:
    Unable to send message: In local permit/deny

    Ny clues? I tried upgrading from gaim, even wiped out my ~/.gaim dir, no help.

    1. Re:AOL/AIM woes by JensenDied · · Score: 1

      2 things 1) its now ~/.purple 2) check your tools->privacy options

      --

      09:F9:11:02 - 9D:74:E3:5B - D8:41:56:C5 - 63:56:88:C0

  47. Re:Pidgin? by Speare · · Score: 4, Funny

    Perhaps you need to get some exercise for your vocabulary of the English language, so that these new and unfamiliar words do not frighten you so much.

    Haa? It's pidgin , bradda. You some haoli, you not know pidgin no real English. You learn pidgin lidat because da kine real English too much hana hana. Mahalo!

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  48. The big button..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously... what is with the BIG status change button ? I can't seem to get rid of it... it totally kills the interface imo....

  49. Re:Pidgin? by aksenkto! · · Score: 2, Informative

    Das How! What is this guy talking about? http://www.twojapaneebruddahs.com/2005_07_01_2jb_a rchive.html ...the definition of pidgin for some 1.2 million people.

  50. I can't find it. by bill_kress · · Score: 1

    I'm not supposed to install features into Ubuntu unless they are in a trusted repository, and this isn't.

    I've been told on Slashdot that we shouldn't be installing software from just anywhere.. then we would have to look into the background of every author of every project we install. By trusting a repository we only have to trust the owners of that repository I guess.

    Hmph, I don't know what to do.

    ps. I'm being sarcastic. This is a carryover from another thread where my complaint that "apt-get" was always preceded by "sudo" (meaning that linux security is overridden about as often as Vista's) where I was told that all linux security resided in using only trusted repositories and never trusting a project (which seemed really impractical--epically in light of articles like this about great looking packages already at the 2.x level that are not available in the standard repositories)

  51. why? by hyperstation · · Score: 0

    why does pidgin 2.0 (i'm still calling it gaim, pidgin sounds retarded) seem to have less features and display options than gaim 1.5? also, is MSN fixed?

    1. Re:why? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      It only seems to have less features because they hid some of them in menus rather than having separate entries for them.

      For me one of the annoying things is the removal of the invite button in Yahoo conferences. You have to Conversation>Invite.

    2. Re:why? by hyperstation · · Score: 0

      i had trouble finding the thing that makes the names and icons in the buddy list not so goddamn huge. turns out it was controlled by unchecking the "show buddy icon" box. real intuitive...

  52. Re:Pidgin? by D+H+NG · · Score: 1

    To me, pidgin always evokes a sense of half-assedness. I know that they're going for "we can speak many languages", but to me, pidgin has a negative connotation. A person who speaks pidgin is not a professional, but usually a common laborer who only have informal exposure to a foreign language. Have you ever heard of "jack of all trades, master of none"?

  53. Terrible interface by oyenstikker · · Score: 1

    I just installed it and gave it a shot. What on Earth possessed them to eat up part of the typing box for the controls instead of using a menu? Hopefully that will be changed in the Pidgin version.

    --
    The masses are the crack whores of religion.
  54. Re:Pidgin? by nine-times · · Score: 1

    I agree. To spell it out: The name (along with the icon) call up the idea of a pigeon. Like a carrier pigeon, a messenger. Also there's the actual meaning of "pidgin", as an intermediary means of communication, between people speaking different languages, as the different IM protocols available in Pidgin are sort of "different languages". Also, the idea of people using a "pidgin language" of sorts when they IM: omigod, I mean, WTF??? :)

  55. I hope it comes with better sounds... by razpones · · Score: 1

    The original sounds are pretty ugly, there is a guy (brad?) that made some alternative ones, they are better, but it would be nice if they were already included or if they made some new ones that don't suck.

  56. Why the funny standards? by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I should have one keyring, damn it. This isn't specifically a problem with GAIM-Encryption (and they go over why they chose not to use GPG in the FAQ*), but I have to maintain a keyring for my email, for GAIM-OTR (the encryption plugin I use), and for WASTE--and there's no good reason to do this! The PGP standard has a very robust standard for key management, which should be usable for pretty much any situation--and it is. WASTE keys work exactly like PGP keys do, only you have to import and manage them separately. What gives? Is GPG so hard to interface with that people feel compelled to reinvent the wheel? A quote about SSL channels and a penis-shaped sound wave is coming to mind here.

    (Also, I see that there exists a GPG-based Gaim plugin, "gaim-e", but it hasn't been touched in five years.)

    * I disagree with some of their reasons; for instance, you can import a key (and thus send someone messages) without signing the key or indicating trust of it in any fashion. A central keyserver is not a single point of failure, because it doesn't define trust relationships, and if you use the web of trust properly, it doesn't matter if someone hijacks the keyserver or not. Also, it's not that hard to put the timestamp inside the encrypted stream; while this is a matter of concern for replay attacks, there's no reason why this should discount the use of GPG's key management system entirely; inserting a timestamp and/or nonce into the IM before sending it (and possibly removing it when it's received and checked for uniqueness/sequence/that it was sent in the last ten seconds) isn't impossible.

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  57. well... by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 1

    The good - Yahoo, GTalk and LJTalk now work.

    The bad :

    Item: They took my favorite customization (Enter = \n; Ctrl-Enter = "Send") away. I've read the blog post, I understand why. Then they basically said, "Well, if you REALLY want that, you can just customize your .gtkrc file based on our example." WRONG. WRONG. WRONG. The Right Thing is to include an interface in the software that accepts the key desired (see WinAMP's Global Hotkeys dialog) and then automatically rewrites the .gtkrc file. (If you're hellbent on going that way, anyway. Why not have a .pidgin-options file? WHY make it a part of an overarching toolkit wide file?) Bad UI! BAD!

    (Also, I don't know where the hell I'm supposed to put .gtkrc on a Windows box, but that's my problem.
    * C:\Documents and Settings\Username\Application Data\gtk-2.0 ?
    * C:\Program Files\Common Files\GTK\2.0\etc\gtk-2.0 ?
    (I hope not - if a user-level setting has to be put in \program files, it Fails It.)
    What about, as a random google brought me,
    * C:\Documents and Settings\Username\.themes\Default\gtk-2.0 ?
    Maybe just
    * C:\Documents and Settings\Username\ ?
    NONE of them work, apparently. )

    Item: Speaking of bad UI, the mechanism to set an away message makes me want to run down the street screaming and stabbing UI developers.

    Item: AIM chats still don't flash on new traffic.

    The ugly: The new smileys. They look like they were drawn by second graders. I understand they can't use the official AIM ones anymore, but they could have at least come up with something dignified looking. (not the Yahoo! ones either. Ick.)

    Also, the trend towards less options. Less options is BAD. If you feel your prefs are becoming too crowded, look at firefox and write an "About: Config" like interface. Don't just say, "Well, *I* don't use this option; let's throw it out."

    And this after only an hour of playing with it...

    --
    if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
    1. Re:well... by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Speaking of bad UI, the mechanism to set an away message makes me want to run down the street screaming and stabbing UI developers.


      I agree, I'd rather have the little buttons back than that blasted status thingy. But you're lucky, one of the beta's was broken enough to have TWO of them.

  58. Re:Pidgin? by identity0 · · Score: 4, Informative

    As a Linguistics student taking a course called "Pidgins and Creoles", I should probobly explain the concept...

    A pidgin is a language that combines aspects of two languages, and is created by people who have a need to talk to someone who doesn't speak their language. The language usually has words taken from one language, and syntax from another. A pidgin is a language which is used only in certain situations, like an employer giving orders to employees or merchants trading in a marketplace.

    If a mixed language becomes the native language of a community, it's called a 'creole' language.

    I realize that 'pidgin' has negative connotations because it often arises in social situations like slavery or colonialism, but the languages themselves are not a sign of uneducatedness but a natural result of different language communities mixing.

    Note that what Pidgin(the software) does isn't pidgin - it's more like multilingualism with many protocols. A "real" pidgin would be like combining the AIM and MSN protocols into one.

  59. Re:Pidgin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It sounds like a jungle midget headhunter.

    I wish I had points to mod you up. All the replies about pidgin's dictionary definition completely miss the point. I know exactly what pidgin means, yet when I saw your comment I said "bingo, exactly right". It's an awkward word with unusual English sounds. Like GIMP, regardless of how witty the name is it will turn many people off. And that's a shame.

  60. Text client by cxreg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Let it not be overlooked that 2.0 includes "Finch", which is a text mode IM client! (instant messaging in screen)++

    I've been using CenterICQ for a couple years, but after trying the last beta of Finch (was gaim-text at the time), I'm sold. It's really slick.

    1. Re:Text client by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Hey thanks, I wondered what finch was.

      Now I have to figure out how the UI works on it.

  61. Don't expect shiny things by A1miras · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Actually, he said their lawyers discouraged them from making an "official" release as a show of good faith.

    I'm fairly certain he was referring to the reason Gaim 2.0 stayed in beta for so long, NOT hidden extra features.

    --
    Take Care

    A1miras
  62. Re:Pidgin? by RalphTheWonderLlama · · Score: 1

    Some people like talk story
    Some go on fo' days
    I listen dem and I learn lotta 'tings
    And I learn new words fo' say
    I practice da local lingo
    And mostly I do fine
    But one 'ting, bra, I just don't get
    What dey mean wen dey say "Da Kine"

    You get da kine, I get da kine, everybody want a piece of my time
    You get da kine, I get da kine, all I wanna know is wheah da kine?

    Kimo wen work in da morning sun
    Loading up da mac nut shells
    All of a sudden he wen jump in da air
    And he geev one terrible yell
    I say "Kimo, what's da mattah?
    What happen dis friend of mine?
    He say "One mongoose wen jump out of dis bush
    And he wen bite me een da kine!!!

    You get da kine, I get da kine, everybody want a piece of my time
    You get da kine, I get da kine, all I wanna know is wheah da kine?

    Lani is sure some ono girl
    She work een da department store
    I'm takin her out on da town one night
    I'm waitin by da exit door
    She say "Try wait just one minute!"
    I ask what is on her mind
    She say "Don't worry, George, I be back soon.
    Just as soon as I can find da kine!"

    You get da kine, I get da kine, everybody want a piece of my time
    You get da kine, I get da kine, all I wanna know is wheah da kine?

    Just one moah 'ting boddah me
    Maybe you can explain it, bra
    What did Lani mean last night wen she made me stop da cah?
    She wen move up right beside me
    She wen put her hand in mine
    She wen kiss my lips, and den she say
    Dat she wanna check out my da kine

    You get da kine, I get da kine, everybody want a piece of my time
    You get da kine, I get da kine, all I wanna know is wheah da kine?

    --
    simple, fast homepage with your links: http://www.ngumbi.com/
  63. Wheah Da Kine? by RalphTheWonderLlama · · Score: 1

    Some people like talk story
    Some go on fo' days
    I listen dem and I learn lotta 'tings
    And I learn new words fo' say
    I practice da local lingo
    And mostly I do fine
    But one 'ting, bra, I just don't get
    What dey mean wen dey say "Da Kine"

    You get da kine, I get da kine, everybody want a piece of my time
    You get da kine, I get da kine, all I wanna know is wheah da kine?

    Kimo wen work in da morning sun
    Loading up da mac nut shells
    All of a sudden he wen jump in da air
    And he geev one terrible yell
    I say "Kimo, what's da mattah?
    What happen dis friend of mine?
    He say "One mongoose wen jump out of dis bush
    And he wen bite me een da kine!!!

    You get da kine, I get da kine, everybody want a piece of my time
    You get da kine, I get da kine, all I wanna know is wheah da kine?

    Lani is sure some ono girl
    She work een da department store
    I'm takin her out on da town one night
    I'm waitin by da exit door
    She say "Try wait just one minute!"
    I ask what is on her mind
    She say "Don't worry, George, I be back soon.
    Just as soon as I can find da kine!"

    You get da kine, I get da kine, everybody want a piece of my time
    You get da kine, I get da kine, all I wanna know is wheah da kine?

    Just one moah 'ting boddah me
    Maybe you can explain it, bra
    What did Lani mean last night wen she made me stop da cah?
    She wen move up right beside me
    She wen put her hand in mine
    She wen kiss my lips, and den she say
    Dat she wanna check out my da kine

    You get da kine, I get da kine, everybody want a piece of my time
    You get da kine, I get da kine, all I wanna know is wheah da kine?

    hehehehe

    --
    simple, fast homepage with your links: http://www.ngumbi.com/
  64. Wow, they really suck at coming up with a name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Calling it pidgin is just as gay as gaim.

  65. No Jabber? by EricTheGreen · · Score: 1

    Just downloaded the Win client and Jabber does not appear to be available as an account type. Did the team drop this? Jabber was supported in 1.5.

    1. Re:No Jabber? by FrankNFurter · · Score: 3, Informative

      Jabber is still supported. The account type is now called 'XMPP' though.

      --
      "Slashdot - the one place on the internet where guys brag about how small it is." - that IT girl
  66. No Skins? Bad Idea. by Petersko · · Score: 1

    If the target audience for the program is people who have no personal desire to change their screens for aesthetic reasons then bravo. Well done. But how far out of touch do you have to be to not know that skins are desirable? They should be available and easily installed.

    Fine. It's free. They can do as they choose. But there are a few free clients, and this one looks dreary. Boring. Sterile.

    It's efficient and seems fast, but I've got plenty of CPU power, and video cards aren't a roadblock anymore. I'll pass.

    1. Re:No Skins? Bad Idea. by FrankNFurter · · Score: 1

      I prefer the sterile, un-skinned look of Pidgin to the colourful skins you get for other messengers. (ICQ 6 is one of the worst offenders here.)

      --
      "Slashdot - the one place on the internet where guys brag about how small it is." - that IT girl
  67. Re:Pidgin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    iAgree

  68. I still have Pigeon 1.0 by suitepotato · · Score: 1

    It sits in its cage, eats its seed and peas, drinks its water, and coos excitedly at television. It doesn't send messages but writing out lol omgwtf on little pieces of paper is annoying anyhow. Seems to work fine, so I probably won't upgrade until the unit reaches end of life and maybe go with Parakeet 2.23.

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
  69. Re:Pidgin? by ronocdh · · Score: 1

    Very well said, but I think the reason the name is witty is because of the highly publicized (in academic literature, anyway) divide between IRL speech and IM-speak, or 1337 sp33k. I personally have been so socially inept as to say things like "IRL" IRL. I think that's what the Gaim--er, Pidgin guys were getting at.

  70. Does it still lack keyboard support? by Wolfier · · Score: 1

    An irritating limitation of all older versions was the inability to type in a contact's name on the contact list and have the correct contact highlighted as-you-type.  Why force me to use the mouse to click on contacts?

    Even ancient (1997-ish) versions of ICQ had this feature.  I cannot believe we're running backwards.

    1. Re:Does it still lack keyboard support? by Turey · · Score: 1

      Seems to do it for me. It's kinda easy to miss the text box at the bottom though. It also appears to allow you to select contacts by typing in part of their away message or their idle time.

    2. Re:Does it still lack keyboard support? by Wolfier · · Score: 1

      > Seems to do it for me. It's kinda easy to miss the text box at the bottom though.

      But, if it requires me to click-select the "text box at the bottom", it defeats the entire purpose.

      The whole contact list should be keyboard-sensitive, not just the text box.

  71. Authorization Spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this thing blocks authorization spam in ICQ, I'll try it out for that alone.

  72. Re:Pidgin? by Przemo-c · · Score: 1

    Not quite ... more like bitchin... Actualy nice name for an IM ;] or at least a slogan That piggin is bitchin... ;]

  73. Slackware package available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Slackware package for Pidgin 2.0.0 is now available at Linuxpackages.net.

  74. Re:pidgin-encryption? .. it's out! by greenskyx · · Score: 1

    "For use with Pidgin 2.0.0: Pidgin-Encryption 3.0 is available in source code. or as a Win32 self-extracting binary. Note: Keys for AIM users may be automatically regenerated the first time they use this new release, see the release notes for more details: release notes." I've tried it and it works well.