Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Bans Modified Xbox 360s From Xbox Live

An anonymous reader writes "Microsoft has now officially started banning Xbox 360s that have had their DVD drive firmware modified from Live, possibly using information brought in by the Crackdown-originated Halo 3 beta downloads. Scene site forums have already collapsed under traffic, and Microsoft has officially confirmed that they are banning modded Xbox 360s to keep the online playing field fair and level."

334 comments

  1. Reprecussions? by Lenneth-chan · · Score: 1, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our console-modding overlords to the PS3. Or does Sony have a similar policy? I wouldn't know; I'm perfectly happy with my PS3 and DS.

    1. Re:Reprecussions? by Lenneth-chan · · Score: 1, Redundant

      And by that second 'PS3', I actually meant 'PS2'.

    2. Re:Reprecussions? by Kuku_monroe · · Score: 1, Funny

      And by 'ds' you mean 'cat'? :D

      --
      //WR
    3. Re:Reprecussions? by grumbel · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't think there exist any unofficial mods for the PS3 yet. You can install Linux on it, but that is officially supported and the hypervisor stops you from meddling with data to which you shouldn't have access.

    4. Re:Reprecussions? by DJHewi1025 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Don't you need to have games for the PS3 to play in order to be banned from online play? Oh right..... n/m

    5. Re:Reprecussions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow so those games I bought and played and had fun with... am I hallucinating again mommy?

    6. Re:Reprecussions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, buying a PS3 probably involves being on all sort of drugs... so, yes, you were probably hallucinating

    7. Re:Reprecussions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or rather, his "mommy" was on drugs, since she's probably the one that paid for it.

    8. Re:Reprecussions? by powerlord · · Score: 0, Redundant
      I'm not aware of any unofficial mods for the PS3 yet either, and you're right that the hypervisor keeps any other OS from accessing either the graphics chip, or the PS3 partition, but I think Linux IS officially supported.

      Besides providing the tools to reformat and repartition the hard-drive (and making it a standard, user-servicable, laptop hard-drive), along with tools to backup your settings to a USB/flash drive, and restore them (all crucial in reformatting a hard-drive to include a Linux partition) there is this bit from a March press release:

      http://www.us.playstation.com/News/PressReleases/3 79

      Following the keynote presentation, the SCEA booth will be a central focus at GDC as the company introduces new development tools and technologies designed specifically for PS3 and the PLAYSTATION®Network, as well as PSP® (PlayStation®Portable) handheld entertainment system. The SCEA booth - Booth #410, West Hall - will offer visitors a sneak-peek at:
      • Tuner for PS3 - Developed by SN Systems, a subsidiary of Sony Computer Entertainment Inc., the Tuner is a profiling tool that enables developers to quickly highlight bottlenecks and conflicts in source code, helping them improve code performance. The Tuner is a software application, so there is no special hardware required, which enables developers to create high performance games with less guesswork.
      • Unreal® Engine 3 - Epic's next-generation game engine technology targets a diverse set of genres from fighting games to shooters to Massive Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games
        High-Level Graphics Package - PSSG (a PS3 optimized cross-platform graphics engine and tool-chain) production-ready extensible scene-graph framework that is written to take advantage of PS3 strengths
      • Pioneering profiling and analysis tools and physics technologies
      • Developing with Linux on PS3
      • Demonstration of downloadable titles from the PLAYSTATION Network, such as flOw, Blast Factor(TM) and Calling all Cars(TM)

      (emphasis mine)

      The latest linux kernel from YellowDogLinux has working support for the Wireless Network adapter, and there is also the following from Terra Soft's (the company behind YDL) PS3 FAQ:
      http://www.terrasoftsolutions.com/products/faq/ps3 /models.shtml

      QUESTION: Is PS3 support for Linux improved over that of the PS2?

      Definately. Sony has designed the PS3 to run Linux. Your experience as an end-user will be optimal.

      (emphasis mine)
      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    9. Re:Reprecussions? by Fizzl · · Score: 1

      I think you will find 'dd' will have much more sophisticated controls over bitflow than both 'ds' or 'cat'.

    10. Re:Reprecussions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, he said "supported", not "unsupported".

  2. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Queue the "Microsoft banned my UNmodified box" stories...

  3. Stupid decision... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why should I buy a XBox360 when I can't mod it?

    1. Re:Stupid decision... by *weasel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You can. They just don't want you to play online against people who have OEM consoles.
      If they didn't want you to mod the box at all, they could just brick it.

      --
      // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    2. Re:Stupid decision... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Why should I buy a XBox360 when I can't mod it?

      Why indeed. I'd prefer to spend a bit more money and get a general purpose computer that will not impose restrictions on my usage. If you can't install Linux on it or otherwise do with it as you please, it's not anywhere near as useful as it should be.

      However, the XBox 360 has been very popular, even here in the heart of free software land, even though it's got more digital restrictions than an MPAA-approved download, and each and every sale funds the evil empire. It's all very weird. Perhaps people are still hoping it will eventually turn out to be as modifiable as the original XBox by some sort of TCPA-defeating miracle.

    3. Re:Stupid decision... by heinousjay · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Personally, I like the games. I don't really have fun as a political statement.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    4. Re:Stupid decision... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 0

      If they didn't want you to mod the box at all, they could just brick it. They'd probably quickly become the target of class-action lawsuit if they tried that. They may end up with one anyway - does this "live" service do anything other than play multiplayer games? Like software updates, 'free' games and/or other downloads? If so, then depriving the users that have paid for all of those services on the mere suspicion of mis-using one of the services may not sit so well.
      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    5. Re:Stupid decision... by ectal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      1. The 360 is popular because it's a very good product. As is. If someone from "free software land" buys it, they're presumably not buying it to install Linux and turn it into a networked bagel toaster control center.

      2. Even if the 360 were highly-moddable and could easily run Linux and function as a workstation and do all kinds of unexpected and exciting things, why should we let the modded Xbox on Live? And why would the modder care at all about being banned from Live? The only modders who would care about that are "pirates" and people who cheat at games.

      3. Finally, MS doesn't make much money on things 360. Not yet, anyway. And really, regardless of how I feel about MS's style of competition and no matter what I might like or dislike about them, I don't lose sleep whenever I think about them making money. It's not like they're using the money to burn down forests and put lead in grade school water supplies.

      --
      http://nerdcartoons.com/
    6. Re:Stupid decision... by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 5, Funny

      > If you can't install Linux on it or otherwise do with it as you please, it's not anywhere near as useful as it should be.

      I apply the same litmus test to all decisions in my life, including my choice of girlfriends and pets. That's why I masturbate a lot and have a hamster that runs Ubuntu.

    7. Re:Stupid decision... by svendsen · · Score: 5, Informative

      As someone who has a 360 and had a silver account (the free one) then got a gold let me give you some facts:

      1. Console updates are given to anyone.

      2. You may download free stuff with either account

      3. Some content (free) may first be only available to gold members then to silver.

      4. You must have gold to play multiplayer.

      5. You can buy extra content without having a gold membership

      Look playing on xbox live has a set of rules. Like playing in the NBA, NFL, Nascar, etc ,etc. Don't complain cause you get banned because you are no longer on the same level, doesn't matter what the "hack" is, want to play on live it costs 50 bucks a year and you can't mod your 360. Don't want to follow the rules then don't play.

      Dumb analogy complaining sports have substance abuse rules. Why not let athletes who have been loaded up on steroids compete against those who trained without them?

    8. Re:Stupid decision... by Pulse_Instance · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I highly doubt that there will be any lawsuits because of this. If someone were to bring a suit against Microsoft for banning them for having a modded console Microsoft would slap them with a DMCA circumvention suit immediately, it would work in Britain and the US for sure. As for false positives I bet that the reason they have taken a year in waiting to ban the modded consoles is that they have taken the time to test against consoles that they themselves have modded in order to be absolutely sure. I didn't hear of any first generation unmodified xboxes being banned from Live for being modded.

      Last generation it was worth modding the xbox as you could then use tunneling software to play multiplayer games but I don't know if there is anything like that available for the 360 yet, which in my opinion makes modding the 360 not worth it. I think it is going to take quite a bit for me to mod my 360. Someone would have to build a Live like server to distribute updates using some sort of tunneling software and try to distribute updates that way. I think that they would still need to actually change the dashboard first, which as to my knowledge has not happened yet.

    9. Re:Stupid decision... by Durzel · · Score: 1

      It's not really that weird, it's more likely that the modding scene represents a small segment of the market. There are hundreds of thousands of X360 owners who probably don't have the first clue about how to copy X360 games, let alone what you need to buy on top (modchips, etc) to make them work.

    10. Re:Stupid decision... by revlayle · · Score: 1

      Most technology manufacturing companies are in that same boat, it is NOT special to Microsoft

    11. Re:Stupid decision... by orielbean · · Score: 1

      No, the PSP will brick if you have modded firmware to load your own games. I haven't heard of any lawsuit with teeth on that one... You are licensing the hardware. Whether or not you agree is not the issue -MS took the easier less painful path here and just denied people from the service vs ruining a 300.00 piece of hardware.

      If you modded one, you can still revert back to the old version and get back online. They realize that the multiplayer is a big pull and so they are driving users to go at it in this manner. I like it better anyways, as it keeps the cheaters out of multiplayer. I don't like it because it prevents my fair use backup from functioning. It's a trade-off.

    12. Re:Stupid decision... by zarkill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Another good sports analogy that also covers the "I'm free to do what I want with my hardware" argument: corked bats in baseball. Sure, you're free to modify and cork your bat all you want, but that doesn't mean Major League Baseball is going to let you use it in real games.

    13. Re:Stupid decision... by blackicye · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Dumb analogy complaining sports have substance abuse rules. Why not let athletes who have been loaded up on steroids compete against those who trained without them?"


      That _is_ kind of a dumb analogy, considering "modding" your Xbox360, or in this case re-flashing the optical drive firmware gives you no advantage over "the playing field"

      Its not like flashing the drive lets you run cheats or install your aimbot. The only playing field in question is shelling out $50 for the games.

      Its totally understandable that they are doing this to try to ensure people only buy original games, but it has nothing to do with keeping the playing field fair.
    14. Re:Stupid decision... by svendsen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "That _is_ kind of a dumb analogy, considering "modding" your Xbox360, or in this case re-flashing the optical drive firmware gives you no advantage over "the playing field" Its not like flashing the drive lets you run cheats or install your aimbot. The only playing field in question is shelling out $50 for the games. "

      Prove it. You can't.

      Prove this hack doesn't allow any other hacks to be run. Are you 100% no hacks exist, are you sure right now a hack is being developed off the exploit. Are you sure no hack in the future will ever exist off this exploit? Of course you can't be sure.

      That's why they ban any modded Xboxes. You are thinking well right this second nothing bad can be done, they are thinking ya but what about 1 second from now...1 min...1 day....1 month.

      Again the rules are simple: 50 bucks a year no modded 360's. Follow them or get banned.

    15. Re:Stupid decision... by bberens · · Score: 1

      Good thing Microsoft doesn't make computers, otherwise that story would look really bad for them.

      --
      Check out my lame java blog at www.javachopshop.com
    16. Re:Stupid decision... by Wicko · · Score: 1

      No, those are not all facts, you can play multiplayer online, you just don't have special skill matching options, etc. http://www.xbox.com/en-US/live/memberships/

    17. Re:Stupid decision... by zoward · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Indeed. I bought a 360 because I spend the bulk of my time in free software land. Which is to say, instead of having a dual-booting gamer's PC or having to maintain a separate Windows PC, I have a 360 to game on and a linux PC to work on, hack on, stream media, act as a print/SSH server, etc. I no longer incur the time and expense cost related to keeping my gaming box "current", and my PC will remain linux-worthy much longer than my extra gaming PC ever stayed up-to-date. This becomes ever more important when you acquire a mortgage, spouse, and one or more children, which compete with gaming for your hard-earned dollars ;-)

      That having been said, I have no problem with MS banning modded boxes from Live. Nor do I have a problem with people who may someday be able to mod their 360 and turn it into a media center, although I'd rather just build a Myth-capable Shuttle box if I wanted to do that.

      --
      "Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?"
    18. Re:Stupid decision... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I'd be wary about bricking it. You know how good WGA worked in detecting legal and illegal versions, and we're even talking the same company here... Could be kinda expensive for MS.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    19. Re:Stupid decision... by Corpuscavernosa · · Score: 1

      Ok that was one of the funniest comments I've seen on /. ever.

      --
      We figured out a long time ago that it's easier to elect seven judges than to elect 132 legislators.
    20. Re:Stupid decision... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GP poster here.

      I still think it's weird. Here's a story about how modders are being banned, and people replying to this topic say they aren't happy about that, even though it is exactly what they signed up for when they bought the closed XBox 360. "I bought this proprietary Microsoft system, Microsoft said I couldn't modify it, but I modified it anyway, and now I've been banned from online play!" It's like pirating Windows and then complaining that the WGA check fails. If you don't like being treated that way, don't spend your money with Microsoft.

      So glad I didn't post the GP comment using my name. Saying certain things always gets you modded to minus infinity, and the rules here are very complicated. The hive mind is opposed to DRM, except for the DRM in their favourite games console, which shall not be criticised for any reason. Apparently Windows wouldn't be so bad if it only ran on proprietary Microsoft hardware and would only load Microsoft-licenced applications.

    21. Re:Stupid decision... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Are you implying that Ubuntu is a treadmill?

      I'd switch distris.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    22. Re:Stupid decision... by iapetus · · Score: 0

      Provide the slightest bit of evidence that he's wrong.

      If you could run unsigned code on Xbox 360 with this modification it would be all over the place. Your theory requires a close-knit conspiracy of genius hackers who want no credit or acclaim for their skills, but just use it to slightly improve their online rankings when playing on Xbox Live.

      Claiming that it's for anything other than preventing MS from losing money on pirated software (which they have every right to do, as far as I'm concerned) is ludicrous.

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
    23. Re:Stupid decision... by mingot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Its not like flashing the drive lets you run cheats or install your aimbot.

      Actually . . .

      Google "Coalesced.ini" to see how Gears of War had its ranked leaderboard hijacked by people who were enabled by flashing the drive.

      Of course I am not niave enough to think that this is MS's primary motivation here :)

    24. Re:Stupid decision... by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      Apparently Windows wouldn't be so bad if it only ran on proprietary Microsoft hardware and would only load Microsoft-licenced applications.

      Actually, that would be pretty cool. The 360 works really well for what it does. And it's good enough for Apple.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    25. Re:Stupid decision... by CRC'99 · · Score: 1

      It makes me wonder what legal avenues MS are opening them up to if they choose to terminate access to X360's when installing a modchip is perfectly legal etc in Australia.

      Sony learnt the hard way about modchips on the PS2. Legal precedent was set. Good luck getting that overturned many years on.

      --
      Sendmail is like emacs: A nice operating system, but missing an editor and a MTA.
    26. Re:Stupid decision... by svendsen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't have to prove anything. You hacked the 360, you broke the rules for live. You now have to prove it CAN NEVER EVER be used for an exploit. Will you guarantee that with your life?

      Again to use XBoX LIVE you have to follow the rules. You break them you are gone. It's not a matter of well I only broke this one little rule...

    27. Re:Stupid decision... by metamatic · · Score: 1

      I bought a 360 because I spend the bulk of my time in free software land.

      Presumably you're one of the rare free software folk who has no ethical problem with what Microsoft does, then?

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    28. Re:Stupid decision... by DarkJC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      First of all, the PSP does not brick if you use modded firmware, I've played many games on mine fine. There is only risk of bricking while the firmware is being written to the PSP, obviously if there's a loss of power or something else in the middle of the procedure.

      Second, no, it doesn't matter if you revert back to the original drive firmware, your XBox System ID has been banned forever. They don't check for a modded XBox each time you sign in to live and allow/deny access based on whether you're modded or not, they've been data mining information about which systems are modded for a while and now just permanently banned them.

    29. Re:Stupid decision... by delinear · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While I agree that MS should be allowed to protect their profit margins, I have to say I disagree with your points 1 and 2.

      I had the original XBOX and I modded mine because it made an awesome media centre, I could drop in a 250GB HDD and store all my media on the thing, or even hook it straight up to a network and stream the media from my PC. It turned the XBOX into what MS always wanted it to be, and did a much better job than MS have done so far with the 360.

      Having said that, I also very much enjoyed playing (legit) games on my XBOX, and the one thing I lamented was not feeling I could use the Live service (okay, some chip makers claimed to allow safe Live access, I didn't think it was worth the risk). At the time, I didn't lament enough to give up my media centre solution - now I'm hooked on Live and I have to have separate online console gaming/media centre solutions vying for space in my living room. If I could chip the 360 to do what the XBOX did AND still get my online gaming fix, it would be perfect.

      So, not just pirates that miss being able to chip their console and play online.

    30. Re:Stupid decision... by Wicko · · Score: 1

      Correction: You can play MMO's, I read a little further.

    31. Re:Stupid decision... by mrsbrisby · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      3. Finally, MS doesn't make much money on things 360.
      Microsoft hasn't made any money on the 360. Microsoft's "gaming division" (that's XBOX) has lost a billion dollars every year according to Forbes, and the reason they can do that is because they obtained an illegal monopoly in another market.

      Competing with a monopoly is impossible, which is why we have antitrust laws.

      It's not like they're using the money to burn down forests and put lead in grade school water supplies.
      But it is like that. Having Microsoft (or a company like it) means that your taxes are about 10 billion dollars a year higher than they would otherwise have to be. That means that your government can either test for lead, or they can raise your taxes.

      Buying a 360 makes it easier for Microsoft to continue to do that.
    32. Re:Stupid decision... by Y-Crate · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I bought a 360 because I spend the bulk of my time in free software land.

      Presumably you're one of the rare free software folk who has no ethical problem with what Microsoft does, then?

      As opposed to Sony and Nintendo who have both shown a willingness to engage in questionable behavior to suit their own ends?

      It's a sad reality, but if you want to play games, you have to deal with companies that are not always ethical.
    33. Re:Stupid decision... by toolie · · Score: 1

      It makes me wonder what legal avenues MS are opening them up to if they choose to terminate access to X360's when installing a modchip is perfectly legal etc in Australia.

      Does it matter if it is perfectly legal in Australia if you are connecting to their network? Feel free to mod your 360 all you want, just don't expect Microsoft to let you play with others on their network, legality doesn't even apply.

      --
      -- toolie
    34. Re:Stupid decision... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Look playing on xbox live has a set of rules. Like playing in the NBA, NFL, Nascar, etc ,etc. The obvious difference being that professional atheletes are paid to play, they do not themselves pay money in order to play. When a customer purchases a product there are certain minimum levels of performance guaranteed by state and federal consumer protection laws. Refusing to provide service to a user who has not done anything but modify his own personal property certainly has the potential run afoul of such laws.

      1. Console updates are given to anyone.
      2. You may download free stuff with either account
      3. Some content (free) may first be only available to gold members then to silver.
      4. You must have gold to play multiplayer.
      5. You can buy extra content without having a gold membership The only really pertinent point is one you didn't mention - does this "banning" prevent access to the non-multiplayer functions too? If so, MS is certainly in questionable territory.
      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    35. Re:Stupid decision... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      If someone were to bring a suit against Microsoft for banning them for having a modded console Microsoft would slap them with a DMCA circumvention suit immediately, it would work in Britain and the US for sure. You might want to re-evalute that "for sure" bit. There is no precedent for prosecuting the owner of his own hardware for modifying it under the DMCA. I don't have the case information, but I suspect there is precedent for suing the resellers of pre-packaged modification devices, although even that may not be the case.

      One thing about the DMCA is that Hollywood really doesn't want certain parts of it tested in court, especially the parts that ultimately result in restrictions of fair use - and there is no physical difference between a "pirated" game and a "backup" in case the 2 year old puts the original in the microwave. MS has their head so far up Hollywood's butt that they won't do anything wrt to the DMCA in court without Hollywood's blessing, and hollywood just might not bless the kind of suit you suggest for fear of MS losing it and establishing a precedent.
      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    36. Re:Stupid decision... by Puff+of+Logic · · Score: 1

      When a customer purchases a product there are certain minimum levels of performance guaranteed by state and federal consumer protection laws. Refusing to provide service to a user who has not done anything but modify his own personal property certainly has the potential run afoul of such laws. IANAL, but I think you're referring to things like warranties of merchantability, and warranties that the product must be fit for the intended purpose, etc. I also know that many products (especially electonics) explicitly state that the user modifying--or indeed just cracking the case of--the product immediately voids all warranties. While I have no doubt that the manufacturer's warranty is immediately voided, I don't know what the law says about state/federal-imposed warranties being similarly voided. I'd be interested to see if this has been tested in court yet.
      --
      P.P.S. I'm doing Science and I'm still alive.
    37. Re:Stupid decision... by beyondkaoru · · Score: 1

      i dunno; if i were to design a game with multiplayer like this, especially with rankings, i'd make sure that the xbox logs player input. on request, the program should allow others (probably just moderators, but maybe other players too) to view the logs (you'd want to exclude non-competitive and/or personal input, like chat, when logging), and if a moderator finds that someone has either resulted in a game state that is not reachable from the input that the player did, it is obviously hacked, and one can also view what the player did to check for whether there was, say, and aimbot involved, and if so derank the player.

      --
      the privacy of one's mind is important.
      you do have something to hide.
    38. Re:Stupid decision... by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      Agreed, but the point here is to have a closed system in which no one can cheat. There's always going to be security holes in games, but allowing only unmodified systems online keeps individual game developers from having to play cat and mouse with their userbase. See halo 2 for examples.

    39. Re:Stupid decision... by SailorRipley · · Score: 1

      however, with every new OS they make, they force people to get new, more powerful hardware

      --
      Chance favors the prepared mind...especially when you Question Authority
    40. Re:Stupid decision... by beyondkaoru · · Score: 1

      this is true. it would be difficult and require some serious coding to implement what i suggested beyond simply allowing people to view replays. i'm trying to find a middle ground between allowing a more open system while stopping cheaters. if we only want to stop cheaters, then yes, a closed system would help. it is tougher to make a cheat that doesn't modify the system. however, there are ways to do it -- for example, bots in mmorpgs. personally, part of the blame lies in the fact that the game is so simple it's automatable, but a very creative coder could build something that simply analyzes video and controls the mouse/keyboard in the case of some simplistic games. in other games, having a calculating program gives a huge edge (i can imagine something being implemented for a game like gunbound).

      essentially, in order to have a system which requires a human player, we need to check that there's a human player.

      another thing which might be kind of neat would be to have multiple interfaces to a game's protocol... but i'm getting off topic and haven't thought that part out as much anyway.

      --
      the privacy of one's mind is important.
      you do have something to hide.
    41. Re:Stupid decision... by SatireWolf · · Score: 1

      > If you can't install Linux on it or otherwise do with it as you please, it's not anywhere near as useful as it should be.

      I apply the same litmus test to all decisions in my life, including my choice of girlfriends and pets. That's why I masturbate a lot and have a hamster that runs Ubuntu. So what you're really saying is that you're waiting for the open sourced linux based girlfriend development kit?
    42. Re:Stupid decision... by Monkey · · Score: 1

      If I could chip the 360 to do what the XBOX did AND still get my online gaming fix, it would be perfect. You sort of can, especially if you use something like TVersity. Although I agree it doesn't have the high awesome factor of XBMC, I still use it to play my MP3s and videos no problem.
    43. Re:Stupid decision... by larytet · · Score: 1
      the company just burns approx 10 bil of USD in developing things of average or below average quality. why not to invest these cool 10 bil in biotech, for example, or genome research ?

      btw the simple and somewhat cynical answer to the question above - nobody is really interested in keeping human lives long and productive. there are so many humans on the planet, that some say that there are too many.

    44. Re:Stupid decision... by iron-kurton · · Score: 1

      In sports, it's irrelevant that it gives you no advantage - the point is, you cheated. Dale Earnhart Jr was reprimanded because his team used banned bolts on his spoiler. They probably didn't give any real advantage, but he broke the rules. It's stupid, yes (just like Stoudemire and Diaw getting suspended), but they broke the rules (and I'm not defending the Spurs by any means). Break the rules, pay the price. Simple as that. I may not agree with the rules, and I'm all for going out and getting the rules changed, but don't complain when you intentionally break the rules and get reprimanded for that.

      --
      Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine -- Robert C. Gallagher
    45. Re:Stupid decision... by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      essentially, in order to have a system which requires a human player, we need to check that there's a human player. Let me be the first to propose mandatory eye-toy-type devices (with signed code and a hypervisor of course) for all Halo 3 matches.
    46. Re:Stupid decision... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      first of all, you're obviously on glue, so i'll try to use small words.

      1. successful companies do not cause a raise in taxes.

      2. buying a 360 puts more money in billg's pockets, which puts more clean water in africa. think about it.

      3. sniffing glue is bad for your sinuses.

    47. Re:Stupid decision... by James_Aguilar · · Score: 1

      You know somebody's going to be playing naked just to make the random screeners uncomfortable. :P

    48. Re:Stupid decision... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "with your life?"


      Jesus fuck, dude, it's a box that plays games on the internet. You get points for shooting other players. Lighten up a little.
    49. Re:Stupid decision... by vuffi_raa · · Score: 1

      my girlfriend runs linux

    50. Re:Stupid decision... by Conor+Turton · · Score: 1
      "They'd probably quickly become the target of class-action lawsuit if they tried that. They may end up with one anyway - does this "live" service do anything other than play multiplayer games? Like software updates, 'free' games and/or other downloads? If so, then depriving the users that have paid for all of those services on the mere suspicion of mis-using one of the services may not sit so well."

      They wouldn't have a leg to stand on seeing as the T&C for XBox Live have terms specifically dealing with modded consoles which basically say if you get caught, the console is blacklisted.

      --
      Conor "You're not married,you haven't got a girlfriend and you've never seen Star Trek? Good Lord!" - Patrick Stewart
    51. Re:Stupid decision... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      They wouldn't have a leg to stand on seeing as the T&C for XBox Live have terms specifically dealing with modded consoles which basically say if you get caught, the console is blacklisted. And if the T&C's said that you would also get blacklisted if you let someone else play on your system, would that also be an open and shut case? What about if the prevented you from using a telephone to coordinate with other players?

      The point I am making is that just because the T&C's say something does not make it true, state and federal law can and often do supercede certain types of contractual clauses. I'm not a lawyer, but I've read enough case law where the courts have invalidated parts of contracts to know that it happens all the time. I sure wouldn't bet the farm on it being open and shut.
      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    52. Re:Stupid decision... by iapetus · · Score: 1

      I didn't hack the 360, I didn't break the rules. And I'm not disputing that you have to follow the rules or face the consequences.

      What I am saying is that the idea that Microsoft is doing this out of some philanthropic desire to preserve the sanctity of online gaming is utter garbage. They're doing it to protect their revenue stream, pure and simple.

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
    53. Re:Stupid decision... by metamatic · · Score: 1

      I don't see Sony or Nintendo making an out-and-out effort to destroy the free software community.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    54. Re:Stupid decision... by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      Hey man, I do that already, just to make passers-by uncomfortable.

    55. Re:Stupid decision... by Gingernads · · Score: 1

      To the GP poster who said.. "If you don't like being treated that way, don't spend your money with Microsoft." I'd suggest an alternative. "If you don't like being treated that way, DO spend your money with Microsoft". Rightly or wrongly, this is purely to stop people trying to run copied (therefore pirated in MS' eyes) discs.

      --
      Your optimism strikes me like junkmail addressed to the dead.
    56. Re:Stupid decision... by mrsbrisby · · Score: 1

      1. successful companies do not cause a raise in taxes.
      Of course they do. Poorer people have to pay the taxes because successful companies don't. I don't know of any respectable economist that would even think of arguing that. The real question is whether or not it's a bad thing for the largest population to pay the most in taxes, and there is some significant divide in that camp.

      2. buying a 360 puts more money in billg's pockets, which puts more clean water in africa. think about it.
      But you have to hold back the state of the art and destroy jobs in order to do it.

      If you think that the only way to put clean water in Africa is to stop innovation and development of technologies in the west, then buy your Xbox.
  4. Fair and Level? by Cat+Panic · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    What does banning altered consoles have to do with keeping online play 'fair and level'?
    I thought that copies are identical to the originals.

    1. Re:Fair and Level? by heinousjay · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's keeping it fair by not letting people who didn't pay for the game enjoy the service.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    2. Re:Fair and Level? by syylk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What does banning altered consoles have to do with keeping online play 'fair and level'?
      I thought that copies are identical to the originals.


      One might say that using a modified XBox could mean hacked console firmware to gain unfair advantages, like visual aids, gfx drivers clip hacks, aimbots, tricks with skins, etc.

      Another one might say that this is FUD applied to online gaming. After all, we're talking about Microsoft.

    3. Re:Fair and Level? by suv4x4 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One might say that using a modified XBox could mean hacked console firmware to gain unfair advantages, like visual aids, gfx drivers clip hacks, aimbots, tricks with skins, etc.

      Another one might say that this is FUD applied to online gaming. After all, we're talking about Microsoft.


      Yup, you nailed it. When talking about Microsoft, boring logic steps back to make way for our creative imagination!

    4. Re:Fair and Level? by daeg · · Score: 1

      Probably with a similar technique as some PC-based games use, e.g., replacing wall textures with transparent textures, altering colors to make characters stand out more, etc.

    5. Re:Fair and Level? by suv4x4 · · Score: 0, Troll

      What does banning altered consoles have to do with keeping online play 'fair and level'?

      Nothing at all. It's just one more of those crazy things scientists and big corporations try to convince us, such as that second hand smoke is bad for your health or something.

      I mean, here am I, smoking. What has that kid 4 feet away got anything to do with it? Nonsense.

    6. Re:Fair and Level? by Megane · · Score: 1

      One might say that using a modified XBox could mean hacked console firmware to gain unfair advantages, like visual aids, gfx drivers clip hacks, aimbots, tricks with skins, etc.

      ...except that the code signing still hasn't been broken. The current "hacks" still only allow you to run unmodified executables. I suppose it could allow you to use modified data if the executable itself didn't validate the data, but there's a lot less you can do with that. Which leaves...

      Another one might say that this is FUD applied to online gaming. After all, we're talking about Microsoft.

      There's more cheating potential by using an aimbot proxy than by using a hacked drive.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    7. Re:Fair and Level? by Phisbut · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ...except that the code signing still hasn't been broken.

      That it hasn't been published doesn't mean it hasn't been broken. Not all hacks are made public.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    8. Re:Fair and Level? by twistedsymphony · · Score: 5, Interesting

      One might say that using a modified XBox could mean hacked console firmware to gain unfair advantages, like visual aids, gfx drivers clip hacks, aimbots, tricks with skins, etc. Another one might say that this is FUD applied to online gaming. After all, we're talking about Microsoft.
      AFAIK only the executable is signed... so you're still free to modify the rest of the game assets. I've see people on PGR3 driving cars capable of 600MPH and with enough traction to never leave the course even at those speeds. It was done by modifying data on the disc and booting the modified disc with the hacked firmware.

      At this point I think most of that kind of cheating is limited to the gifted few who are capable of knowing what to tweak themselves, but the potential is there, all it would take is someone to release a "tool" to make it easy for Joe-wannabe-hacker and you'll find yourself playing Halo 3 with someone who has infinite ammo, perfect aim, can see through walls, jump twice as high, run twice as fast, takes no damage, etc. etc. etc.

      It's good that they did this, though the number of reported False Positives is appalling. I would suspect a great many of them are due to people who unknowingly purchased used or received refurbished consoles that had previously been modified... those people really don't have any proof that they didn't mod it themselves and their console might actually be modified. There are also some reports of unmodified consoles purchased on launch day (meaning there is no way they were refurbished) getting banned, though it's difficult to tell if the claims are genuine or just some pirate crying wolf.
    9. Re:Fair and Level? by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      The Xbox has had cheating problems in the past in online multiplayer due to modded consoles. For the most part, consoles are a closed system, so it's more invasive and risky to cheat in online multiplayer, as opposed to simply running a background app or modifying files on your PC. With the added risk of bricking the system, cheating is further discouraged.

      There will also be cheating, just like there will always be theft. But if the barriers are non-trivial and carry risks, it discourages idle incursion and limits the problem to only the most determined and knowledgable hackers.

      Personally, I never even owned an xbox, I've only heard reports of the cheating that went on in Halo multiplayer, and can't vouch for how much was actually going on.

    10. Re:Fair and Level? by DrXym · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Probably nothing at all. Theoretically you could mod a 360 to give you an unfair advantage - perhaps you could flood the server with bogus packets to kill it, or use your mod to see things that a game wouldn't normally show etc.

      I think in reality it has more to do with piracy. Despite the protestations of "homebrew" people, it's quite obvious what most modchips are for. By denying pirates a substantial chunk of gameplay experience it may help deter a lot of piracy. I'm sure MS would actually brick modded consoles if they knew of a surefire way to do it. Instead, this is a second best option.

    11. Re:Fair and Level? by Talchas · · Score: 1

      They could just do proper multiplayer asset protection - you may note that this isn't a problem for most moddable PC games. In a decent PC game with multiplayer you'd never see totally broken assets like "cars capable of 600MPH".

      --
      As the Americans learned so painfully in Earth's final century,free flow of information is the only safeguard against...
    12. Re:Fair and Level? by Mockylock · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have anything to do with fair play. It probably shows that they know that everyone will buy or copy Halo, but it's a game that will seemingly force people to run with legitimate machines if they want to run the popular game. I guess it was just a matter of time, considering online play will be tripled at this point. Before, it wasn't a big deal, since the majority of copied games didn't have 95% online gameplay.

      I honestly think this will hinder sales a bit. Either in consoles, or Halo games.

      --
      "Please, shut up. Just when I think you can't say anything more stupid, you speak again." -Archie Bunker.
    13. Re:Fair and Level? by Kryptic+Knight · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Quoted twistedsymphony (956982) on Friday May 18, @09:36AM (#19177837)

      It's good that they did this, though the number of reported False Positives is appalling. I would suspect a great many of them are due to people who unknowingly purchased used or received refurbished consoles that had previously been modified.. But at the end of the day a console that is modded (regardless of who CURRENTLY owns it) is still a modded console. They are not FALSE POSITIVES. They are 2nd hand modded consoles - thus M$ has every right to knock them off of XB Live.
      --
      --- This meme is memory intensive
    14. Re:Fair and Level? by twistedsymphony · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But at the end of the day a console that is modded (regardless of who CURRENTLY owns it) is still a modded console. They are not FALSE POSITIVES. They are 2nd hand modded consoles - thus M$ has every right to knock them off of XB Live.
      I absolutely agree with that, but we don't know if that's the case (it was simply my own speculation). Even still MS sets procedures for gamestores that sell used consoles to ensure that they have not been modified and of course if MS is shipping out refurbished units to customers who sent their console in for repair they should ensure that they're not sending out modified consoles.

      So while I agree that no matter who moded it and who owns it now, the console should be banned I think it's safe to say that keeping those moded consoles out of the hands of the innocent is very much MS's problem.
    15. Re:Fair and Level? by brkello · · Score: 2, Informative

      Cheaters would rather claim that they were unfairly banned than admit to their cheating. Additionally, there are tons of Nintendo/Sony zealots that will say anything to defame the consoles they don't own (not saying that there isn't 360 zealots, just that obviously they wouldn't be involved in this). There probably are a few false positives...but not nearly as many as people claim.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    16. Re:Fair and Level? by RexRhino · · Score: 1

      A modified xbox could include cheat software.

    17. Re:Fair and Level? by PM+Guy · · Score: 2

      This is in now way FUD. The Halo 2 multi-player experience was nearly destroyed by hackers who used any number of cheats. As a casual player with legal copies of games, I am thrilled that Microsoft kicks those guys off.

    18. Re:Fair and Level? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're misreading. This is about keeping a level paying field.

    19. Re:Fair and Level? by Anon99 · · Score: 1

      >They could just do proper multiplayer asset protection -

      But why should the waste time and effort in something that is forbidden by their licence anyway.

      Game console is not a PC, if you modify it MS has no reason why they should allow it on the network anymore.

      Although I do have to admit that I had hacked original Xbox for media player, but I also had a switch to disable the mod when playing in Live.

    20. Re:Fair and Level? by seandiggity · · Score: 1

      Do you know something we don't? ;)

      --
      Geeks like to think that they can ignore politics, you can leave politics alone, but politics won't leave you alone.-rms
    21. Re:Fair and Level? by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why anyone would cheat in the first place. What's the fun in winning a game that requires very little to no skill?

    22. Re:Fair and Level? by soleblaze · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The fun isn't in winning. It's annoying/pissing off the people you're playing with.

    23. Re:Fair and Level? by Cat+Panic · · Score: 0

      That makes sense.

    24. Re:Fair and Level? by JFMulder · · Score: 1

      rse if MS is shipping out refurbished units to customers who sent their console in for repair they should ensure that they're not sending out modified consoles.
      I bet there are little stickers inside the 360 that tells you if the Xbox was opened before being sent for repair. Since you have to open the 360 in order to mod it, it's pretty safe to say that Microsoft probably didn't even fix the console since the sticker protection was broken, so there's no risk of them sending a modded console to another person.

    25. Re:Fair and Level? by tprime · · Score: 1

      Anybody on here who disagrees with the DMCA should not agree that bricking consoles is a good thing in any way. I own my original xbox and LOVE XBMC. I have no problem, however, with the concept that you get to pick whether you want your 360 (or even the original for that matter) 'customized' or if you want to play on a fair level on MS's network.


      www.tomandemily.com

      --
      http://www.tomandemily.com
    26. Re:Fair and Level? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it was. However, the hack wasn't released until a month after it was patched, and attempting to "depatch" a system will brick it.

      http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/461489/30/0 /threaded

    27. Re:Fair and Level? by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      I bet there are little stickers inside the 360 that tells you if the Xbox was opened before being sent for repair. Since you have to open the 360 in order to mod it, it's pretty safe to say that Microsoft probably didn't even fix the console since the sticker protection was broken, so there's no risk of them sending a modded console to another person.
      To improve turn around times they generally just receive your console, give it a once over and ship you back someone else console that had been repaired. Then your console gets repaired and put in the queue to get sent to someone else.

      There are two stickers on the console that supposedly break when it's opened... however it's so incredibly stupid easy to remove the stickers and replace them when your done (I've seen it done with a hair dryer + razor blade + wax paper) unless they're actually checking the firmware they don't know if the console has been modified or not.
    28. Re:Fair and Level? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course we know that it's in everyone's best interest that they take these precautions to keep modded systems from interacting with a service that other people are paying for. But don't lose sight of the fact that Microsoft has earned the high level of scrutiny they receive with all of their bullshit over the years (illegal and otherwise). An overzealous press is a good thing whenever Microsoft is involved.

    29. Re:Fair and Level? by apoc06 · · Score: 1

      why do people troll?
      why do people read and comment on stories that they "claim" not to have any interest in?
      why do people comment without reading the articles?
      why do slashdotters karma-whore?
      why does slashdot UID matter, when being wrong still means youre wrong?
      why do companies try to get away with astroturfing?
      why doesnt MS fix the red lights of death problem permanently?
      why doesnt the ps3 have more games?
      why does IE7 suck so horribly?
      why are most wii games just collections of minigames?
      how many years in a row can EA sell madden before making any major changes?
      how many games does it take on xbox live to play without any profanity, lil kids or racial slurs?
      why do people cheat?

      these are great mysteries. if you can ever solve them, you will reach enlightenment and presumably drop dead right there on the spot.

  5. When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by Tokimasa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What I'm saying is that unlike software (including music), you don't buy a license to use/listen to it. You buy the physical hardware and you can do whatever you want to it. Now, if you do something that is enabling you to cheat in the game (and breaking the software license), then I don't see why Microsoft shouldn't ban you and the console. However, if you mod it in a way that does not affect gameplay, why should you be banned?

    --
    --Thomas J. Owens
    1. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by pete.com · · Score: 0

      They do it because they can. They aren't stopping you from using your modded hardware. They are stopping you from using modded hardware on their online service. Solution: Bye a Wii

    2. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by zyl0x · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Problem is, how are they supposed to tell the difference between a console modified to enable cheating, and a console modified to add harmless functionality? It's not like the indie mod-chip manufacturers are including a little code in their chip that says "Hi Microsoft! I assure you I'm not enabled for cheating. Please let me play with you guys.. :("

      --
      Blerg.
    3. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      If they could verify that it didn't affect game play then they probably would ban you. But there is no way to tell why you have modded it, and what differences it will cause in your game play, so they just choose to ban everyone who mods their system. I really don't have a problem with this. If you are going to mod your system, the only reason I can think of is to run pirated/hacked games. There's other reasons like running Media Centres off them and stuff like that, but it's much easier to do that with a PC, so I don't see why anybody would go through the trouble. I don't know anybody who has a hacked xbox and doesn't use it to run copied games.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by Tokimasa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm more into software than hardware, but isn't there some kind of controller that is aware of what hardware is attached to it? All Microsoft needs to do is determine which components were modified. If the person installed a device that can read and copy CDs/DVDs, ban the Xbox. If they just installed a larger HDD and have all of the correct software (which would presumably include something that can check for pirated games), then the system would be installed. All hardware that you put into the Xbox would just have to be hacked to communicate with the controller as to what it is.

      And, the standard policy of policing online games to ban people known to be hacking/cheating could be maintained. So if someone did hack an "illegal" device to read as legal, then Microsoft could just catch them playing the game online and ban them.

      --
      --Thomas J. Owens
    5. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by T0wner · · Score: 5, Informative

      Now, if you do something that is enabling you to cheat in the game (and breaking the software license), then I don't see why Microsoft shouldn't ban you and the console.

      The firmware hack did not allow you to do this. Since all code on the Xbox 360 (and PS3 for that matter), is signed and run through a hypervisor, for you to run a backup it needs to be identical to the original. Altering any of the code for wall hacks in Hallo 3 for example will change the result of the signing algorithm and the 360 will refuse to run it. The hypervisor was briefly compromised a while ago on the 360 but quickly patched (6 days I believe, so quicker than the file copying bug in vista). Using back ports of the previously hacked Xbox motherboard firmware it is possible to get a few things running such as preliminary XBMC and emulators (I'm not 100% on this maybe someone can confirm). However it is still not possible to run unsigned games.

      Incidentally the method Microsoft used to detect the hack this time is very interesting. It was believed that the DVD drive firmware hack was un-detectable as well as un-patchable since Microsoft had no way of remotely upgrading or checking the firmware. A few weeks ago it was theorized that Microsoft could possibly pick up the difference in DVD read jitter between DVD-R media versus printed originals. You can kinda make out jitter by listening to the extra work a DVD drive does when reading a DVD-R compared to a printed DVD. Anyway a firmware patch was released for this purpose. It appears to not have worked however since reports are coming in that people are getting banned even with this latest patch. Currently its being theorized that possibly Microsoft are checking the read speed difference, between DVD-R and pressed DVD's. Data rates tend to drop slightly to my knowledge when reading DVD-R's, so this could be detected from the main 360 software. Others are speculating that Microsoft have just been data mining for the past few months and have just banned those they have picked up until the jitter patch was released.

      Finally it is also interesting that Microsoft have only banned the detected Xbox console and not the Live account. They clearly want the hackers to spend more money buying more hardware off them. An interesting way of getting some lost revenue back.

    6. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by Guppy06 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "What I'm saying is that unlike software (including music), you don't buy a license to use/listen to it."

      No, with Live that's exactly what you do.

      "You buy the physical hardware and you can do whatever you want to it."

      Knock yourself out, but purchasing the hardware doesn't automatically give you the right to access Microsoft's network facilities on your terms rather than theirs.

    7. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by Stevecrox · · Score: 1

      Their stopping software piracy, piracy is illegal and actually a bad thing in many cases. I'm with people who want to revolt over Digital Restriction Management and the insane prices of Movies and CD's, while I don't pirate myself I can fully understand and agree with people who pirate DVD's and CD's.
      Software piracy is a mixed bag, things like MS Office are insanely overpriced (in my opinion getting outlook, word and excel should not cost £270) while the gaming market has the huge development budgets of most films (thanks to the 360 and PS3) and doesn't have the advantage of the cinema to create revenue, there are a bunch of other costs (support,servers,licensing) which also drive up cost.
      This modification allows people to pirate, it may well have other applications but at the end of the day its eating directly into Microsofts and third party developers 'potential' income. Now I'm not saying that they would get alot more income but that alone should have been enough for this type of crackdown. I'm betting Microsoft were prepared for x number of Halo 3 beta players based on sales of crackdown but got y number of sign ups where y was significantly higher than the number of sales of crackdown. Banning consoles which play pirated discs is a good idea by playing Live your costing Microsoft money and not contributing anything to them (much like a leecher on bit torrent.)The second hand games market is strong and easily accessible (not met a game store yet which doesn't have second games for sale) if you can be bothered to pay for a legal copy then why should you be allowed to play the game?
      While modififying your Xbox360 could have uses, like bittorent I'm guessing that 90% of the modified Xbox's were modded just to play pirated games. Rather than leave openings and allow legal uses (because you know someone is going to figure out how to abuse that) they have taken the simplier option of simply banning any console which doesn't conform.

      What gives people the right to breech the Terms of Service agreement and expect Microsoft to hold up its end?

    8. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by garylian · · Score: 1

      Finally it is also interesting that Microsoft have only banned the detected Xbox console and not the Live account. They clearly want the hackers to spend more money buying more hardware off them. An interesting way of getting some lost revenue back.

      Is M$ still selling these at a loss, or barely past the break-even point? If so, how are they getting money back by making you go buy another?

    9. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      From my understanding, it's not like they're swapping out hardware like DVD Roms or something. They're replacing a single chip on the motherboard, or reflashing the chip with different machine code, or soldering a new chip onto an existing circuit.

      So it's not like "Windows has detected new hardware. Installing Phillips DVD-R." It's harder to detect what exactly has changed and for what purpose.

    10. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by dniq · · Score: 1

      You're free to do whatever you like with your console - they don't turn it off or remove any of its capabilities. They ban you from the network, where you have to abide by their rules. You can mod your console anything you like, but without "xbox live" service.

    11. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      Do whatever you want with your XBox, just don't expect to sign up to XBox Live. After all, you would have been duly warned in the EULA.

      Yeah, I know. I don't like it either.

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    12. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by binkzz · · Score: 1

      I don't think you actually read the article you replied to.

      He was clearly talking about a license to use the XBOX 360 hardware, not Live.

      --
      'For we walk by faith, not by sight.' II Corinthians 5:7
    13. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by Pulse_Instance · · Score: 1

      Is M$ still selling these at a loss, or barely past the break-even point? If so, how are they getting money back by making you go buy another? If you go to buy another console that means you are doing it to play on live, which means that you are going to be buying games to play on Live. If you don't care about playing on Live you'll probably just keep using your modded xbox and won't be buying a new one unless the current one breaks.
    14. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you read TFA, which was clearly talking about banning modded consoles from Live, not sending men in black to take away their 360s.

    15. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If that's true, I predict interesting complaints from legitimate users when the lenses start to pick up some dirt and decrease their read speed due to the necessary error correction and rereads.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    16. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by ThirdPrize · · Score: 1

      I have heard that some people are are slowing their DVD drives down to make them a bit quieter. Will that have the same effect? Different read speed could get you blocked from Live.

      --
      I have excellent Karma and I am not afraid to Troll it.
    17. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Live is their service and they can ban you if they want to. You are free to dick around with the box and not connect to Live. Want to connect to Live, then follow their rules. It's not a hard concept.

    18. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knock yourself out, but purchasing the hardware doesn't automatically give you the right to access Microsoft's network facilities on your terms rather than theirs.

      It isn't so black-and-white as that. A huge selling point for the hardware is that you can connect to the network. It's sold with that intention and understanding. While they do have the right to refuse service, this should have implications for their hardware sales - like a big warning sticker saying that the service can be irrevocably denied.

    19. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by neersign · · Score: 1

      Finally it is also interesting that Microsoft have only banned the detected Xbox console and not the Live account

      I believe that is the same thing they did with the original xbox. Maybe not initially, but eventually. So you still had the chance to either remodify your xbox to conform or use an unmodded xbox and still be able to use your same live account. I actually think its a good thing that they handle it in this manner.

    20. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by stwrtpj · · Score: 1
      What I'm saying is that unlike software (including music), you don't buy a license to use/listen to it. You buy the physical hardware and you can do whatever you want to it.

      Yes, but nothing obligates Microsoft to support any use of the console that falls outside the intended use of the product. Just like if you buy a microwave oven from GE and hack its internals to play MP3s, then you go buy a later model and find you can't do this anymore, GE is under no obligation to respond to your complaints that you can't hack it anymore. Even if you find a way to do it, they are under no obligation to repair the product if it no longer operates as intended.

      This is not really like buying a PC. With a PC, the hardware is manufactured by someone OTHER than MS, so MS can't dictate what you put on that PC, or deny you support for legitimate uses of their product on that hardware. But the Xbox IS manufactured by MS. They have the right to say what they will and will not support.

      Now, if you do something that is enabling you to cheat in the game (and breaking the software license), then I don't see why Microsoft shouldn't ban you and the console. However, if you mod it in a way that does not affect gameplay, why should you be banned?

      And how to you expect MS to detect the "bad" from the "good" mods? And why should they be obligated to do it in the first place since you're already using the product in a way that is not supported?

      The bottom line is, if you modify your console, there is the potential for cheating whether the intent is there or not. To be on the safe side, MS just bans the modified console. Once again, a mod to the console is a use that falls outside of what MS will warranty for the product.

      --
      Karma: Frotzed (mostly due to the Frobozz Magic Karma Company)
    21. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by Bloomy · · Score: 1

      Because cost of manufacture minus revenue from sale is less than cost of manufacture and 360 sitting on store shelf.

    22. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by malevolentjelly · · Score: 3, Informative

      The point is that we, in software development studios, pay a lot of money to get the rights to develop on a console- we spend ~$10,000 a devkit- and Microsoft gets a certain percent of the profit from games. It's what pays for the system. It's about piracy-

      Everyone gets screwed when you steal a game. Let me give you a real world example:

      First off, it's not just suits that you're stealing from- everyone in the company, from the programmers to the testers get bonuses- and that's based on the amount of time they put in. They all profit off of the sales. So yes, you are stealing from the developers as well as the producers.

      Second- an example with our game was when a European review magazine put a (slightly) pre-release build on bittorrent. It had the same title-ID so it worked, but it was slightly different than the final releases. When we released a patch, it destroyed a bunch of peoples' games (binary difference)- because the BT copy was wrong- but still technically worked until then. Our troubleshooting system gets flooded with complaints- and we soon find out its all people who stole our game that demanded we waste our time (and we did- we put in long hours figuring it out) to help them fix it.

      My thoughts: If you modify your console to steal games, you can go to hell. MS has every right to kick you off- when you buy the hardware, you buy the hardware- but if you're going to *use* the system, play by the rules. Games are expensive to make and we work really hard on them. You are welcome to put linux on it- but let's not kid ourselves- You're not 'backing up' games.

    23. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Unfortunately you're making an assumption that all of the people that want to do other things with the hardware that they now own are stealing something from you. It's that kind of thinking that has people allowing the government to slowly remove our freedoms from us at the behest of corporations. Once I've purchased something it's mine to screw with as I please.

      My thoughts: If you modify your console to steal games, you can go to hell. MS has every right to kick you off- when you buy the hardware, you buy the hardware- but if you're going to *use* the system, play by the rules. Games are expensive to make and we work really hard on them. You are welcome to put linux on it- but let's not kid ourselves- You're not 'backing up' games. Do you own a VCR? You're logic then dictates that you are a criminal. A VCR can be used to pirate movies so therefore that is the ONLY thing you could possibly be doing with it. What someone does with the hardware they purchased is their business not yours.

      LIVE of course is a totally different story. LIVE is a service and they have every right to deny service to people that have modified their consoles including tech support. That's the tradeoff that you make for modding.

      The point is that we, in software development studios, pay a lot of money to get the rights to develop on a console- we spend ~$10,000 a devkit- and Microsoft gets a certain percent of the profit from games. Microsoft is fleecing you. The sooner developers figure that out the better. Sadly however it won't happen. You will go on thinking that paying for the privilege of putting a game on their hardware is A-OK and that money that should be in YOUR pocket, being used to ramp up your next hot title, is now in theirs. You're paying for a right you already had and sadly our technologically inept government is paid very well to ignore the artificial restrictions that enable these companies to do what in other areas of business are called extortion.

      Our troubleshooting system gets flooded with complaints- and we soon find out its all people who stole our game that demanded we waste our time (and we did- we put in long hours figuring it out) to help them fix it. That was your mistake. You should have simply had a phone menu option "If you are experiencing problem XXX with the patch", you know whatever it was that made the pirated copy break, "please press 3" which directed them to the a clip of Jim Carrey from Liar Liar "STOP BREAKING THE LAW ASSHOLE"
    24. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "why should you be banned?"

      Becuase, as rightly you noted, just like you have the right to do whatever you want to your hardware, MS is perfectly within their rights to limit access to their network and infrastructure on whatever basis they deem appropriate. Those 'rights and freedoms' you GNUippies are always moaning about go both ways you know.

    25. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by jtcm · · Score: 1

      Altering any of the code for wall hacks in Hallo 3 for example will change the result of the signing algorithm and the 360 will refuse to run it.

      What if I just alter the transparency of the textures?

      There's a lot of data on the discs too. Is all of it signed? Or is it just the executable portion that is signed? If data, such as textures, is not signed, then the game would cheerfully load my newly-made transparent wall textures and neon-red enemy textures.

      I honestly don't know...is the disc signed as a whole, or is it just the executable?

      --
      @ASP.NET's parent-teacher meeting: "Little Johnny.NET is very bright, but he doesn't play well with others."
    26. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by Durzel · · Score: 1

      It is as black-and-white as that.

      If you bought a car and then proceeded to mod it with aftermarket parts which weren't fit for purpose and ended up crashing it would the manufacturer be expected to stipulate that "modifying this car could cause accidents"? Of course not. Since people wouldn't be banned from XBL through legitimate use of the console it's about as "black-and-white" as issues get.

    27. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by antonlacon · · Score: 1

      Just the executables.

      The current method of getting Linux to run on the 360 involves modified shaders on the King Kong game. Such shaders wouldn't run if they were signed.

    28. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you bought a car and then proceeded to mod it with aftermarket parts which weren't fit for purpose and ended up crashing

      That's an awful analogy. In that case, the problem is you breaking the car with your modification. In the XBox case, the problem is Microsoft voluntarily refusing to continue a service. These are not analogous situations.

      Since people wouldn't be banned from XBL through legitimate use of the console

      No. Microsoft does not get to decide what is legitimate use of the console. You own the console, you get to decide what is legitimate use. They get to decide what is legitimate use of the service. And they are certainly within their rights to do that. You seem to have missed my point. My point is that if Microsoft are doing anything wrong, it's selling the XBox hardware without adequate warning that they will cut off the service when you do perfectly legitimate things with your own property.

    29. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ... to keep the online playing field fair and level.

      I thought this was screamingly funny, comong from MS. Then I noticed the word "online".

    30. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by iocat · · Score: 1

      Most analysists think MS is now making $$ per unit sold. But I doubt they were like "let's ban the modders' machines so we can pick up litereally THOUSANDS of dollars in incremental revenue." More likely it's like "the network account isn't the issue, it's the machine, so ban the machine."

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    31. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by Bloomy · · Score: 1

      True. But a lot of people have the misconception that by buying consoles early in their life cycle (when most non-Nintendo consoles are sold at a loss), they are helping the manufacturer lose money. They don't realize the manufacturer will lose more money if the consoles just sit on the shelf, like what Sony's currently experiencing.

    32. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're thinking about this all wrong.

      This situation absolutely compares to car warrantees. It is guaranteed to work as sold. Once you have altered it, it's no longer reasonable to expect it to be supported for any purpose. While you cannot be arrested for altering it, the company has no obligation to support your modified hardware (it worked when they produced it, it's not their fault that you broke it).

      When you modify something in an unsupported way, then any behavior it exhibits afterwards, by law, is undefined.

      Even beyond that, the Terms of Use for the Live service explicitly state that it does not support modified consoles. Thus if you try to connect with a modified console, it is well within the parameters of the agreement that it simply not allow you to connect. Use of the service is NOT guaranteed with a sale of the console.

    33. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "While they do have the right to refuse service, this should have implications for their hardware sales"

      Perhaps, but probably not in the direction you're imagining. It'd be a big selling point if potential customers knew that Microsoft was doing their utmost to ban hackers and other griefers from online gameplay.

    34. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This situation absolutely compares to car warrantees.

      Christ on a bike, quit it with the stupid car analogies. You know what compares to car warranties? The warranties on the XBoxes.

      it worked when they produced it, it's not their fault that you broke it

      But the XBox hackers haven't broken their hardware.

      When you modify something in an unsupported way, then any behavior it exhibits afterwards, by law, is undefined.

      Yes, but we aren't talking about the behaviour of the XBox after modification. We are talking about Microsoft deciding to stop providing you service. This is not even close to being the same thing. One is the consequence of modification, one is the consequence of Microsoft policy.

      Have you ever thought that if you can't argue your point without resorting to stupid analogies that don't work, maybe you are wrong?

      Even beyond that, the Terms of Use for the Live service explicitly state...

      Doesn't matter. I don't know about where you are, but here in the UK, courts and advertising watchdogs have ruled time and time again that fine print can be trumped by marketing materials. You can't describe a feature in an advert and take it away with fine print. For example, see how various ISPs get smacked down for offering "unlimited" stuff in their adverts, when their fine print says otherwise.

      Use of the service is NOT guaranteed with a sale of the console.

      And if that fact was stated on adverts and boxes promoting the console by describing the service, then what Microsoft is doing would not be unethical.

    35. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by malevolentjelly · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately you're making an assumption that all of the people that want to do other things with the hardware that they now own are stealing something from you. It's that kind of thinking that has people allowing the government to slowly remove our freedoms from us at the behest of corporations. Once I've purchased something it's mine to screw with as I please. I'm yet to see someone earnestly back up games with a modded 360. It's a fair call. I'd say the massive majority are burning their games off of BT. I may work for "the man", but I am not an idiot. This is more like saying "just because I'm carrying a gun into that liquor store doesn't mean I was going to rob it"- what the hell else are you going to do with it?- it's a fair assumption on my part, since there's no positive benefit to a modified 360 on the part of the content and service providers. We rely on a consistent consumer experience- if you want an open platform, use PC- don't bring your modder's woes to our support networks.

      Do you own a VCR? You're logic then dictates that you are a criminal. A VCR can be used to pirate movies so therefore that is the ONLY thing you could possibly be doing with it. What someone does with the hardware they purchased is their business not yours.

      LIVE of course is a totally different story. LIVE is a service and they have every right to deny service to people that have modified their consoles including tech support. That's the tradeoff that you make for modding. Are your games streamed to you over the airwaves?- what's the legitimate use for game backups again? Your media is insured by your retailer (if defective) and by the publisher (if destroyed). I never said their consoles should explode- I'm simply stating that those who are stealing their experience should not get the same benefit as those who do not- any inconvenience is appreciated.

      Microsoft is fleecing you. The sooner developers figure that out the better. Sadly however it won't happen. You will go on thinking that paying for the privilege of putting a game on their hardware is A-OK and that money that should be in YOUR pocket, being used to ramp up your next hot title, is now in theirs. You're paying for a right you already had and sadly our technologically inept government is paid very well to ignore the artificial restrictions that enable these companies to do what in other areas of business are called extortion. The development platform is valuable and extremely easy to use. In terms of platform costs, it's well worth $10,000. It's not just hardware- it comes with an excellent XDK also- most modern console developers would agree with me here. We easily make the money back by releasing on their console instead of on a less stable market like PC- I was simply trying to make the point that we all spend money and it's an expensive process that relies on the consumers to do their part to participate.

      That was your mistake. You should have simply had a phone menu option "If you are experiencing problem XXX with the patch", you know whatever it was that made the pirated copy break, "please press 3" which directed them to the a clip of Jim Carrey from Liar Liar "STOP BREAKING THE LAW ASSHOLE"
        We had to figure out which problems were actually caused by pirated games first- and that takes time and money. Believe it or not, we do not have any modded 360's lying around the studio.

    36. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      People are always repeating that as a hard fact. but where is the proof?

      For all we know they could have been selling them at a profit right from the get go. people just assume they are selling it at a loss, and therefore STILL selling them at a loss.

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    37. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by vuffi_raa · · Score: 1

      I agree with you to a certain extent, but the fact of the matter is that there is a difference between pirating games and modding- the reason that the first x-box was so successful was that ppl modded them and used them for media players and internet devices, used them to play emulated games (that are not normally on xbox) linux and a number of other things- I find it interesting that ps3 actually has a linux build and is encouraging user generated content while MS with the 360 (and vista) is discouraging it. This is sad because people don't want to be told how to use their computing power and that they must "play things this way" and "operate things that way". For years MS was a bastion of the opposite of this way of thinking and has encouraged freeware and shareware developers and really spurred the whole movement towards OS modification and usability- but has gotten a BIG head lately with it's lockdowns and lawsuits and really overall bullying. I was talking to someone at best buy recently because I do live audio with my laptop and wanted to get a new xp supported laptop since all of my hardware and software is not supported in vista- what he told me was this "If you can find one buy it- or get an alienware because all of the companies that we sell recalled all of our xp supported machines and replaced them with vista machines that do not have driver support in xp- our company has lost a lot of money on it because vista machines don't sell". I can understand switching up and providing new machines with vista, but to actually recall the xp machines from the retailer to try to push the public to use something that they don't want is wholesale bullying. Luckilly I found a lenovo later that week after hitting about 9 stores (best buy, fry's, compusa and a number of independent stores) that was missed when sending the laptops back on the recall (1 of 2 in the storeroom) and was sold it at cost. Honestly if there was a viable alternative I would switch but I hate macs for audio and even though linux has come a long way, I use it for work but it straight up sucks for audio, video production and 3d modeling (which is what my home machines are for).

    38. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Testing a game is not the same thing as stealing it.

      I will not spend $50 on a game without trying it first.

      The same way I will not spend $30 on a DVD without seeing the movie first.

      The same way I will not spend $20 on a CD without hearing it first.

      Get used to this attitude, as it is where the market is heading, as more people realize they have been screwed out of their hard-earned money by shitty games, movies and CDs over and over again.

      I can leaf through a magazine before buying it, I can test a laptop in a store before making a decision, and I can try on clothes before buying them. Why should things be any different for digital media?

      You don't have a right to a profit, you can earn that profit by making something worth purchasing.

    39. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The point is that we, in software development studios, pay a lot of money to get the rights to develop on a console- we spend ~$10,000 a devkit- and Microsoft gets a certain percent of the profit from games. It's what pays for the system. It's about piracy-

      OH. MY. GOD. You are moaning that starting a business costs $10,000? Fuck you.

      I mean, seriously, fuck you. Your sense of economics is so far out of whack here, you don't deserve any more than those two words.

      There's no other business in the WORLD you can legitimately/seriously get in to for a cash outlay of $10,000. Even a minimart costs more than that. Most business ventures start at $100,000 and go UP from there.

      Whining to any business owner (SUCH AS MYSELF, thank you very much) that $10k is too much outlay will get you a laugh at best. In my case it's a fuck you, since I was laughed at for managing to start my business on $35k.

      >Everyone gets screwed when you steal a game.

      Why yes, they do. Since they no longer posses the game, I imagine they would feel screwed. Or are you talking about piracy? They're absolutely different, you know, similar to the way manslaughter and murder are different.

      I'll assume you meant pirate for the rest of the discussion. Otherwise, well, yeah, if you steal a game from the company that made it, that's grand larceny, and not only will you owe millions (perhaps billions) legitimately, but you will probably spend 25 to life in prison.

      >First off, it's not just suits that you're stealing from- everyone in the company, from the programmers to the testers get bonuses- and that's based on the amount of time they put in. They all profit off of the sales. So yes, you are stealing from the developers as well as the producers.

      You are assuming a purchase of the game would be made. ASS-U-ME, if you remember the old saying. The vast majority of "robbers" (LOL) I see have incomes below the low-income-cutoff level, yet generally pirate about 100 games per year. That puts the loss the company would like to report at above their income level. Considering it is physically impossible to give someone more money than you have access to (without actually robbing things, like banks, although then you have access to the money, don't you?) I can't understand how they aren't getting those imagined profits, unless the game company was going to subsidize them.

      The fun thing most people forget is that people that pirate the most tend to purchase the most legitimately as well. Or at least every single person I have met, and every single person they have met has been like this. I wish there were more studies done to cover this so I could provide more than anecdotal evidence, but it isn't difficult to theorize that an enthusiast of media buys more than someone with just a passive interest. Managing to shut those over-enthused by media out of piracy would have an unknown effect, since up to now it's never happened. I imagine that like a drug addict with drugs, if the product were actually unavailable through illegal means, they would either be driven to illegal acts to legally purchase the product, or they'd quit. Very few addicts actually decide to get a second or third job to supplement their income. In the case of those pirating 100+ games yearly, we'd definitely be talking a second full time job.

      >Second- an example with our game was when a European review magazine put a (slightly) pre-release build on bittorrent. It had the same title-ID so it worked, but it was slightly different than the final releases. When we released a patch, it destroyed a bunch of peoples' games (binary difference)- because the BT copy was wrong- but still technically worked until then. Our troubleshooting system gets flooded with complaints- and we soon find out its all people who stole our game that demanded we waste our time (and we did- we put in long hours figuring it out) to help them fix it.

      Well, here come the questions:

      - Was the magazine authoriz

    40. Re:When you buy hardware, you buy the hardware. by malevolentjelly · · Score: 1

      The dev-kits cost 10k each, you half-wit- every programmer, artist, designer, and tester has one.

      Our game cost ~$14 million to produce. I suppose you've never met pirates that use it as a means to avoid purchasing things? This is another long legitimization of illegal and cheap activity. If you can't afford it, don't buy it.

      And if you really want to *try* before you buy, try RENTING the game. The rental companies are at least licensed to do so. You have no right to 'try' things you steal off bit torrent. The DMCA is pretty draconian for the most part, but that argument doesn't apply- this is a situation where you really are nothing but thieves.

      We are selling a product for a fair price in terms of what it costs to produce it, if you want to use the product, it's only fair to pay for it.

      Wanting to operate your computer without licensing fees is one thing, or to be able to record off your tv, etc.- but this is way outside of fair use. This is an expensive entertainment product we need to sell to make back our investment capital. Media content is very expensive- see a lot of major open source games out there?

      I don't either.

      This product was never broadcast to your home or given to you. You simply took it. It's identical to breaking into an electronics store in order to "try" some of their products out at home to consider if you need to buy them.

      And this business model didn't "fail"- we still pulled in millions in profit. The point is you're hurting the content producters a lot more than the fat cats that get the corporate bonuses.

  6. maybe the spring dash update by cWolfe · · Score: 1

    wouldn't it be more reasonable to assume it was from the spring dash update, because not everyone downloaded the Halo3 demo. Everyone rushed to get the dash update becasue (at the time) it was confirmed that it was working with modified firmware. simple solution, don't play backups on LIVE.

    1. Re:maybe the spring dash update by TheNicestGuy · · Score: 1

      simple solution, don't play backups on LIVE.

      I don't think that would work. According to the article, the ban is triggered by checking your drive's firmware. What disc you have in the drive at the time is irrelevant. Unless you've got some way to restore your box to its factory state before connecting to Live, your console will get blacklisted the first time you try it.

    2. Re:maybe the spring dash update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not the spring dash update that causes this. People that did not upgrade are also getting banned. I'm thinking that MS has been gathering information for some time now.

  7. Re:No Thanks, Microsoft. I'll Keep My Wii by suv4x4 · · Score: 1, Funny

    No Thanks, Microsoft. I'll Keep My Wii

    Wait.. Microsoft wants your Wii?

  8. Fair play by Aneurysm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't see an problem with Microsoft banning people with DVD drives modified to play copied games. It makes it fair for the honest people who payed good money to play. If people with unmodified boxes start getting banned by mistake, then that would be something to worry about.

    There's nothing wrong with anti-piracy measures so long as they're unobtrusive and don't effect people with legitimate copies.

    1. Re:Fair play by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Funny

      If people with unmodified boxes start getting banned by mistake, then that would be something to worry about.

      Don't worry. They used Windows Genuine Advantage as the trial run for this...

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    2. Re:Fair play by MooseMuffin · · Score: 3, Informative

      Exactly. And this was their policy on the original xbox as well so I don't see why this would be a surprise to anyone. One of the strengths of xbox live is that you know the playing field is even. Its a closed network with no way a person can cheat via hacks or mods. They can't determine the nature of your change. Maybe it was something harmless, but maybe it allows you to see through walls in halo, or you're using your own drive with your own code that you can trick the xbox into executing. You can do what you want to your console in your living room, but they won't let you get it onto their sterilized network where your changes can impact other. Seems reasonable to me.

    3. Re:Fair play by Kamineko · · Score: 1

      There's nothing wrong with anti-piracy measures so long as they're unobtrusive and don't effect people with legitimate copies.


      Phew, I was worried for a moment! But it's okay now, Microsoft has everything under control... wait.
    4. Re:Fair play by ScotchForBreakfast · · Score: 1

      Agreed. This move should have long been expected by those altering their consoles. If they want to do it good for them, but obviously there are going to be some downside.

    5. Re:Fair play by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      And what's to stop you using a transparent proxy to modify the network traffic between your xbox and the server?

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    6. Re:Fair play by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      Now, if they'd only ban the 12-year-old retards with their 8-word vocabulary... two of which are variants of "fag".

      Yes, I know there's a way to mute them/rate them poorly.. but that never stops the constant influx of _new_ morons... It's as if the world has an infinite supply of people who feel invincible behind a TV screen.

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    7. Re:Fair play by skobar · · Score: 1

      Not everyone has the knowledge to do that. It will eliminates the majority of pirates.

    8. Re:Fair play by steppin_razor_LA · · Score: 1

      Fighting against software piracy may be understandable, but this goes deeper. The original Xbox when modified becomes an extremely powerful home media center. I still use my old (hacked) Xbox on regular basis for watching movies/music/etc and only rarely play games on it.

      You should be able to modify hardware that you have purchased to extend its functionality. MS ethically (IMHO) should ban people caught pirating software or cheating but not ban solely based upon the presence of modified hardware.

      --
      Evolution: love it or leave it
    9. Re:Fair play by aegzorz · · Score: 1

      Well for one, the encyption. All traffic between the xbox360 and xbox live is encrypted.

    10. Re:Fair play by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

      This does affect people with legitimate copies of games. Just because someone has a modded Xbox doesn't mean they're pirating games.

      I don't have an Xbox yet, but I've used game copying software for my PS2; I possess zero illegal copies of games, but have several hundred that I purchased. Copying the games to my hard drive reduces load time, prevents the dreaded "Disc Read Error", allows me to store the original discs in a safe location and has eliminated the need to find and then swap game discs.

      Backup software for video game consoles is used for legitimate reasons, not only for piracy.

      This is probably a moot point depending on Microsoft's EULA, but I don't believe those agreements have ever been tested in court. At worst people with modded Xbox's will have to simply purchase another one and use the new one to play online.

    11. Re:Fair play by Monkey · · Score: 1

      If you can point me to a source where somebody has actually done this, I will agree your point has merit. I don't disagree that this is theoretically possible, its just that the effort required would probably be better spent on more lucrative activities like stealing credit card numbers than cheating at a game.

    12. Re:Fair play by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Fighting against software piracy may be understandable, but this goes deeper. The original Xbox when modified becomes an extremely powerful home media center. I still use my old (hacked) Xbox on regular basis for watching movies/music/etc and only rarely play games on it.

      You should be able to modify hardware that you have purchased to extend its functionality. MS ethically (IMHO) should ban people caught pirating software or cheating but not ban solely based upon the presence of modified hardware.


      So instead of just doing what is reasonable and possible, you would like them to tackle a virtually intractable problem. ID'ing what is a good mod and a bad one.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    13. Re:Fair play by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Encrypted using a key which your xbox clearly has...
      You steal the key from the xbox, and then you can man in the middle it...
      Or, you man in the middle it anyway assuming the xbox doesn't perform any kind of host authentication.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    14. Re:Fair play by aegzorz · · Score: 1

      Yeah the box has the key, not me. Main memory is encrypted IIRC.

  9. "Mod" me up +1 not banned from Live by __aawkdb2598 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In an ideal world people would be able to mod their DVD players to their heart's content without having to worry about things like this.
    Unfortunately, we don't live in an ideal world. As a Live player who frequently encounters modders who use their modifications to gain unfair (read ridiculous) advantage over the competition. It's no fun to play the game and service you're paying for when you have opponents with auto-aiming snipers that shoot through walls. Or even if they can just fly (a far more rare and less threatening occurrence that is nonetheless not an exaggeration. As long as stuff like that exists banning modded 360's from live is a good way to protect the greatest part of your paying customer base from such behavior.

    1. Re:"Mod" me up +1 not banned from Live by __aawkdb2598 · · Score: 1
      Post contains nonsensical sentence, should read:

      As a Live player who frequently encounters modders who use their modifications to gain unfair (read ridiculous) advantage over the competition, I have to say that I approve of this policy.
    2. Re:"Mod" me up +1 not banned from Live by cWolfe · · Score: 2, Informative

      But they cant use auto-aiming sniper that shoot through walls because unsigned code wont run on the 360

    3. Re:"Mod" me up +1 not banned from Live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, there are mods that allow unsigned code to be run. How else would they do it?

    4. Re:"Mod" me up +1 not banned from Live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      They run some kind of proxying software on a computer situated between the xbox360 and the live network. Changing the firmware flash of the dvd drive does not allow you to run unsigned code.

    5. Re:"Mod" me up +1 not banned from Live by ad0gg · · Score: 1, Informative

      They could modifiy the textures which aren't signed to say be transparent(wall hacks).

      --

      Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    6. Re:"Mod" me up +1 not banned from Live by eboot · · Score: 0

      The flying thing isn't a mod or a cheat, it's the Halo super hero WonderChief!

      --
      Two tears in a bucket. Motherfuck it.
    7. Re:"Mod" me up +1 not banned from Live by Osty · · Score: 1

      In an ideal world people would be able to mod their DVD players to their heart's content without having to worry about things like this.

      Just to be clear, Microsoft is not taking legal action against users with modified consoles, and they're not intentionally bricking the console. They're not preventing you from making the modification if you so choose. All they're doing is banning that modified console from a service which has in its Terms of Use a clause stating that no modified console may be used. You (generic "you", not the parent in particular) accepted the TOU in order to subscribe to Live, so now you have to accept the consequences of breaking that TOU.

      You can no longer use Microsoft's online service, but you can continue using your console offline as much as you like. This is a win-win situation -- Microsoft gets to discourage piracy by preventing access to Live (a huge part of the 360 experience), and "right to modify" people get to retain their right to modify their hardware however they like as long as they don't mind not accessing Live.

    8. Re:"Mod" me up +1 not banned from Live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks, I'll mod you -1 for asking to be modded up.

      First, I LOVE how crappy players always complain about competing against modders. Guess what? I don't believe there are a lot of people doing this. Maybe you can't compete because you suck.

      Secondly, banning modders "to keep the online playing field fair and level" is total BS. Read the first fucking line of the article: "Microsoft's Xbox 360 now able to sniff out illegitimate copies of games". They're doing it so gamers cannot play copied/bootleg games. Microsoft doesn't care about fair gameplay, they care about their bottom line.

  10. Missing the point. by EvilCabbage · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's their network, why shouldn't they ban people that don't play by their rules?

    I say this as somebody that purchased a 360 less than a week ago, and loaded up the hacked firmware for my drive less than 24 hours ago.

    Am I bummed? Not really. It's a private network, they can do whatever they like with it. Doing anything I want with my hardware sure as shit is my right, but I shouldn't expect other people to be forced to allow me to play on their servers like it's some base human right being violated.

    1. Re:Missing the point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. It's their network, they can do whatever they want with it. There's always xlink or xbconnect for the outcasts or those that simply don't want to pay 15 bucks a month to Microsoft.

    2. Re:Missing the point. by DaveCBio · · Score: 3, Informative

      Please show me on which planet Live costs $15/month. If you are going to take swipes at least try to have some facts right.

    3. Re:Missing the point. by snaptography · · Score: 1

      http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/liberty-positive -negative/ Great point - This plays off the idea of positive & negative freedoms. While you have the freedom and capacity (mental & physical) to make these modifications they also have the right to say that with these modifications you've made to your own property you are now unable to utilize our network. They make the rules, it's their network that you subscribe to. Anyone reading this that lives in the USA should know this - if you don't agree with or wish to support this then don't consume it, don't allow capitalism to foster and strive there and if enough people are also dissatisfied then the company (in this case Microsoft) will have to alter their original plans. This is the idea of market logic and capitalism.

      --
      -- www.kiwicommunications.com --
    4. Re:Missing the point. by EvilCabbage · · Score: 1

      Another thing is that they've thinned the line between 'their network' and 'my Xbox'
      Well, yeah I almost agree with you on that point, but again, it's their network. If I want access to it, I have to consent to them auditing my hardware. If I don't want them auditing my shit, then there's no reason for me to allow it, they just won't let me play with the other 'cool' xbox Live kids. This hardware inspection isn't forced upon anybody, it's just part of the deal they offer for a free gaming network (or $50AU per year for the Gold membership). No arms being twisted, no family being threatened.
      I can deal with that, I'll just start using one of the alternatives.
      For the record, I have only played on Live once or twice, and I *own* the games I play.
    5. Re:Missing the point. by dnahelix1 · · Score: 1

      "Another thing is that they've thinned the line between 'their network' and 'my Xbox' (note: I don't actually own one). The Xbox automatically signs in to Xbox live if there's a network connection." Since you don't actually own one, you wouldn't know you're wrong about it signing in. It doesn't automatically sign in. You can tell it to, or you can sign in yourself. The other thing is if you don't have an Xbox Live account, you can't sign in at all.

    6. Re:Missing the point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Please show me on which planet Live costs $15/month. If you are going to take swipes at least try to have some facts right.

      Planet earth. $46.52 / 3 = $15.51 monthly, before 14% taxes.

      Ok, so that's $CDN, but hey, you didn't specify.

    7. Re:Missing the point. by DaveCBio · · Score: 1

      If you are dumb enough to buy 3 month month sub for that you deserve it.

  11. Surprising that this has not happened already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you bought an XBox 360, you bought in to a closed platform. The manufacturer made it quite clear that there was no intention of allowing you to use the 360 as a general purpose computer*. They tried hard to prevent you modifying it, and this is just another part of that. You wanted to be able to do whatever you wanted with the hardware? You shouldn't have bought a locked-down trusted computer from the world's most aggressive software monopolist, then.

    Think with your $s and don't buy a trusted computer, even if it is disguised as a games console.

    (* using the FSF meaning of this term, rather than the Bill Gates "it plays videos as well as games" meaning)

  12. But the Innocent... by Infe · · Score: 1

    But this seems like it's mostly going to hurt people who pick up 360's off ebay, or second hand somewhere else. These banned boxes are going to be dumped, the people will probably rehack with a more undetectable hack, and the poor schmuck who buys their old box is going to be in for a big surprise.

    --
    Posted by yintercept - "...science...[is] the study of the 'divine creation.' "
    1. Re:But the Innocent... by Scottoest · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The mantra for used goods, as far as I can remember, is "buyer beware". Plus, if a person buys an XBOX 360 off of eBay, and it isn't what the seller said it was - a fully functioning XBOX - then they can take it up with eBay channels for dealing with such issues. That isn't really Microsoft's problem.

      We often rail on Microsoft on this website, for implementing "anti-piracy" measures at the expense and convenience of legitimate customers. As such, I don't see how people could complain about this. They are banning modded boxes from XBOX Live (not BRICKING them, which is an important distinction), and leaving paying customers the hell alone.

      As with any mass action like this, there may be a few people who are inadvertently targeted by this, but hopefully Microsoft will take care of them properly. If they don't, we can skewer them then.

      - Scott

    2. Re:But the Innocent... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, perhaps there will also open up a market in acknowledgedly banned Xbox 360s. I'd like to get one, but there's no way I'm buying one new. I want to run Linux on it; aside from minimal purposes like media centers, the Xbox is pretty useless as a Linux system, but the 360 is balls-out. And if I could get it considerably cheaper I might think about getting one.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  13. Coming Soon... by spoonboy42 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We'll probably just see the same thing that we did with the first XBox: a modchip with an external switch connected that can tell it to disable itself and let the original drive firmware load. Of course, setting it up probably won't be as easy as it was in the XBox 1 (which had a nice little LPC port that you could get the system to load a different BIOS from by just shorting one solder point to ground)... it may be necessary to actually remove the firmware ROM chips from the drive and wire in a new switched bank with copies of both the original and the modified firmware, but it certainly seems doable.

    Another issue that slightly complicates things is the fact that the 360 signs you in to XBox live by default when you have an active network connection, so modders will have to be careful to unplug their ethernet cables when the switch is turned on. One vulnerability remains, though, and that is that Microsoft may choose to push out a dashboard update which checks for the drive's original firmware on EVERY bootup, and remembers to tattle to XBox live as soon as you sign on. Microsoft could choose to store this data on the hard drive/memory card (in which case it could be defeated by having a pair of storage devices, one for modded and unmodded use), or they could put it in the 360's internal flash storage, where the dashboard and system software itself is stored (no easy solution for that one, but I don't know enough about the 360's internals to know if the internal storage is flash RAM, which makes this easy, or an EEPROM, which would seem to require that the dashboard reflash itself with the new variable set every time that happens).

    Anyway, it does seem that it is possible to defeat this scheme. I'd also like to note that Microsoft's stated reason for the update is bullshit, since even with the drive's firmware flashed, the 360 will still only load Microsoft-signed executables (meaning that it can play backups of original games, but is useless for homebrew and modified games). They might as well just come out and say that it's a measure to defeat privacy, since they've locked out homebrew programs anyway (with the exception of their XNA creator's club program, which lets you run only games written for their limited API, and only in C#, instead of giving access to the full-on devkit that the pros use). Couching it in pro-gamer language about defeating cheaters is disingenuous.

    --
    Anonymous Luddite: "What do you think of the dehumanizing effects of the Internet?"
    Andy Grove: "Not Much."
    1. Re:Coming Soon... by jZnat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Like I did with the original Xbox, I believe it would just be a lot easier to own two of them, mod one, and use the other for Xbox Live. Of course, this only becomes more feasible when the console drops in price (or you buy a used one on eBay or similar to mod of course), but in my experience, is the path of least resistance.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    2. Re:Coming Soon... by SSCGWLB · · Score: 1

      Or, maybe, people could pay for software they use! That is a lot of hoops to jump through to steal something that isn't yours. I realize that people say this is to play 'backups', but do they really have that much trouble keeping the original playable? My 360 is well over a year old, I have been using it almost every day (often switching disks, it's my primary DVD player), have yet to scratch a disk. If the disk get scratched, replace it. Chances are, it was the users fault (didn't put the disk in the case, change orientation of the 360 while disk was spinning, they have kids, etc). This is analogous to going into a store, buying a shirt, and then stealing a second one in case something happens to the first!

      This is not a problem for the honest 360 user who buys the games he/she plays. All of the pirating schmucks deserve what they get.

    3. Re:Coming Soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      We'll probably just see the same thing that we did with the first XBox: a modchip with an external switch connected that can tell it to disable itself and let the original drive firmware load. There is already a modchip that will do that on its own. you can find it here http://www.modchip.com/xbox360/nme360v13order.php It's called the NME 360 v1.3

      This is the description they give for it "The NME 360 v1.3 is a universal chip for all Xbox360 DVD drives. It will patch the firmware of the drive on-the-fly. The original firmware on the flash of the drive remains untouched.
      The chip will recognize independently which media was inserted and switches itself to the corresponding mode. That also means you will not have to install an external switch on your Xbox 360 to put the chip off."

      It will also turn the network card off when it detects a copied media so you cannot connect to xbox live.

    4. Re:Coming Soon... by BathTub · · Score: 1

      I suppose you could make the switch disconnect the network at the same time as allowing the use of the updated firmware.

    5. Re:Coming Soon... by goatpunch · · Score: 2, Informative

      Another issue that slightly complicates things is the fact that the 360 signs you in to XBox live by default when you have an active network connection
      It complicates the issue for about 5 seconds until you disable auto sign-in.
    6. Re:Coming Soon... by hesiod · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > This is analogous to going into a store, buying a shirt, and then stealing a second one

      You really need to work on your analogies. There is no way any honest (and reasonably intelligent) person can make a useful analogy between physical items and data like that.

    7. Re:Coming Soon... by Raistlin77 · · Score: 1

      ...This is analogous to going into a store, buying a shirt, and then stealing a second one in case something happens to the first!...

      No, this is analogous to buying a blank white shirt, then using your friend's shirt as a basis to make a copy with your white one. Your analogy is flawed in that it tries to equate the real physical loss of the store to the mere copying of a disk. Nothing is stolen when a disk is copied.
    8. Re:Coming Soon... by NullProg · · Score: 1

      I realize that people say this is to play 'backups', but do they really have that much trouble keeping the original playable?

      Yes.

      Original Media Survival Rate (OMSR) = MEDIALIFE / (#ofkids)^2;

      This formula works for CDs, DVDs, VHS, Nintendo games etc. I think there is a gender bias in the formula, but I cant prove it because I have all boys. With my 3 kids, the original media survival rate (OMSR), is about 6 months. Occasionally there is a disturbance within the algorithm, the first Harry Potter movie (VHS) survived only three days.

      Enjoy,

      --
      It's just the normal noises in here.
    9. Re:Coming Soon... by powerlord · · Score: 1

      Don't worry.... MS has already thought of this for you. Now you have a reason to go out and purchase an XBox Elite and leave it unmodified, whereas before this, you merely may have been angry over a newer higher-priced model becoming available. :)

      Seriously though, whats to stop MS from banning XBox customers who upgrade their hard-drive on their own, instead of shilling out for the ludicrously expensive branded upgrade?

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    10. Re:Coming Soon... by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
      come out and say that it's a measure to defeat privacy

      Sure, but the suits will never talk about the elephant in the living room. Just like the politicians, who get caught with their dicks in their hands, later that week resign "to spend more time with their family."

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    11. Re:Coming Soon... by MarkAyen · · Score: 1

      Couching it in pro-gamer language about defeating cheaters is disingenuous.

      From TFA:

      We have stated in the past that customers can only enjoy access to the Xbox LIVE community through the use of a genuine, unmodified, Xbox console and we will continue to enforce this rule to ensure the integrity of our service, the protection of our partners and the benefits of our users.
      (Bold added for emphasis.)

      Sounds like PR speak for "fight piracy" to me.
    12. Re:Coming Soon... by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      It is hilarious that you mention scratched media since that one of the most common hardware failures of the 360. My friend a had a game ruined by it, it put concentric circles allover the disk. Now, he moved it from upright to lying flat while it was running, which the manual probably says not to do in some tiny footnote, but I think he was reasonable not to expect gently doing that to ruin his game. Here's a guy demonstrating.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
  14. Re:Don't even bother! by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There is a difference between steroids (modding to cheat) and practice time.

    While the end result may be the same insofar as those who have more time play better, whining about your circumstance and complaining that you can't compete is pretty pathetic.

  15. This is a good thing by Alexpkeaton1010 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The only reason I pay my Xbox Live subscription is to play on a clean network with no cheating. Granted, I have seen cheating, but it is very rare compared to say... any PC game. And it is usually quickly fixed. Like the vast majority of people, I bought my Xbox 360 to play games, I did not buy it to mod it. The *most important* thing in any competitive game or sport is fairness; skill, talent, and practice should be the only deciding factors in the outcome. If you want to mod yours, fine, but I don't want to see you on Xbox Live, which is a *private* network. The reason why there is such little cheating on Xbox Live is that it is detected at the hardware level, *not* on a per game basis like in PC Games. This is why I pay, and this is why I prefer to play FPSs on Xbox Live. Sure, I would rather play with a mouse and keyboard, but fair competition is the most important thing in online play.

    1. Re:This is a good thing by yoprst · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My experience with Call of Duty that the ratio of people perceived as cheaters to actual cheaters is somewhere around 1000 to 1. Could this also be true with other games?

    2. Re:This is a good thing by fimbulvetr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Take a moment to check out cod2 hacks on youtube. The hacks are so ubiquitous, you'd have to be a fool to _not_ use them.

      p.s. I don't play cod2 for that very reason.

    3. Re:This is a good thing by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is.

      When you spend some time in FPS games, you sooner or later get accused of cheating. Happens even to me from time to time. Personally, I shrug it off as some sign of respect, i.e. that I have to be kinda good to make people think I cheat. Sadly, the truth is probably closer to them being completely inapt. But having my delusions help me think I don't suck as badly as I do.

      A prime example would be BF2142 and its myriad ways of detecting enemy presence. Aside of a commander ability that shows all enemies on a mini-map, you can, provided you have the necessary goodies unlocked, do it yourself to some limited extent.

      When now someone runs past you, cloaked, and you start shooting him, rest assured that sooner or later a claim of cheating will follow. Ignoring that the "class" you play gets a bonus at detecting cloaked enemies, that you see him as a huge red dot on the mini-map and that you can hear his cloaking device give off a quite annoying whine. Follow your ears and that predator-like blur and you got him in no time.

      In other words, any moron with half a clue would've seen him. Still, you can be certain, after you got him a few times (using every time exactly the same approach and you killing him every time exactly at the same spot, which is THE best known "sneak past the enemy" spot on the map to boot), you'll hear laments of cheating.

      99% of the false cheating accusations can be traced back to a few reasons:
      First, the other player knows the map VERY well and knows what approaches you can come from and where you can't come from. If there's only ONE corridor you can take, he won't bother checking the others.
      Second, some games have "radar". Allowed radar, not cheated. Especially the more sci-fi oriented FPSs do. If you ignore it, your loss. Others use it to efficiency.
      Third, experience. After playing a few 100 hours, you CAN actually do a headshot with a snapshot. Doesn't work all the time, but I know usually just where I have to direct my facing before switching to the sniper scope to have your head right where it should be. And yes, there are people who can sync-switch weapons, giving you a 99% health taking bullet to the body and switch over to sidearms. There are people who know exactly how long your gun reloads and who count your shots.
      Fourth, teamwork. Even without any "real" verbal communication, a lot of games implement now ways to tell your team buddies where the baddies are. No, he didn't see you sneak up. But one of his buddies did and warned him in time to switch from sniper rifle to sidearm, twist around and cap you before you could knife him.

      And so on. The list is far from complete, but accusations of cheating in modern games are usually false. Unless people blatantly abuse bugs in the game (like, sinking inside walls so they can't be shot or similar stuff), or blatant use of aimbots, you won't be able to see the difference of a really good gamer and a cheater.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:This is a good thing by sponga · · Score: 1

      Another great example of a person getting freaked out by people not zooming in is my famous taking a washable red marker and putting a dot in the middle on your screen over my crosshair, that way I do not have to zoom in and I learned it from play Counter Strike.

      BF2142 is a great game and there are still no ads in-game or your privacy being invaded by all the fear mongers that everybody got worked up over many months ago. Too bad a lot of people missed out on all the gadgets and new stuff invented in that game; it set an example of how the developers listened/communicated and implemented/tweaked ideas in the game to get everything working together. Much faster patch release as compared to BF2 so it was a better experience.

      What always gets me is how everybody cheers the hackers/crackers for cracking it but really all they do is opens pandoras gates for all the scrip kiddies to do typical stuff of causing havok.

    5. Re:This is a good thing by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      BF2142 is a good example of how you get additional goodies added to your arsenal without making you omnipotent against someone without it. Let's be honest, those tank mines are a killer, but only against a tank pilot who doesn't know how and when to use his shield. The sniper cloak is quite useful to get to a position unseen, but you can't snipe cloaked and you can't sneak past an enemy. The additional guns are useful, but usually only in very special situations (like the shotgun, which is deadly in close range but useless in anything but it).

      The only notable exception is maybe the grenades, but they can be bought with the first promotion, i.e. after only a few games.

      But you're not omnipotent with all gadgets at your disposal. I'm Field Commissar Silver, i.e. I have almost all goodies you may get (well, all but one that give you anything useful, IMO), still, I rarely if ever manage to end a game with a scoring medal (i.e. am rarely one of the top three scorer).

      Only beef I have with BF2142 is that the expansion was not really that good IMO. The maps are not really balanced and completely unsuitable for Titan mode (either, they're way too small for Titan or, like Bavaria, anything but fun).

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:This is a good thing by MisterOblivious · · Score: 1

      "Follow your ears and that predator-like blur and you got him in no time."

      I've come to the realization that there are a lot of folks out there who either can't/don't use their ears, or simply prefer to listen to music while playing. Trying to "sneak" past an enemy with your cloak on without the mask of nearby gunfire is a sure way to end up with a few pistol rounds in the face. My favorite incident of killing the "I r teh ubar sneeky" sort happened in BF2:MC (the xbox version). The game was set up in such a way that anyone, friend or foe, within a certain radius could hear your open mic unless you made sure to hit the mute button. I was defending a flag and heard some guy breathing hard into his mic, checked the screen and saw the owner's voice was in red and therefore unfriendly. I did what anybody would do: bounced a grenade around the corner. 6 kills. Flag saved.

      If you've got the equipment around, or are willing to spend the money an audio compressor will protect your ears from explosions while still allowing you to have the game volume high enough to hear incidental sounds like footsteps or clinking gear coming your way. An Alesis 3630 has a pretty terrible rep as a musical device and can be picked up used for under $50. Depending on how my mixing board is patched for other projects, I'll sometimes have a 3630 on my mic to level out the sound going to TS or in-game voip and a RNC1773 on the headphones. This setup removes some of the twitchy excitement from a game so it's not always in use, but it certainly makes long gaming sessions much more comfortable.

    7. Re:This is a good thing by yoprst · · Score: 1

      I mostly play cod1 on a server that is very agressively monitored for the cheaters. Either your PB works perfecly and delivers good screenshots with nothing non-standard, or you're banned for life. Is it a problem to find such server for cod2?

  16. Same as the original. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    They were regularly banning modded XBoxes. A friend of mine bought himself a second machine for online play which would have been nice for Microsoft if it wasn't for the huge loss they were making on every console at the time.

  17. And...? by TimeElf1 · · Score: 0

    Nothing new here leopards don't change their spots after all.

    --
    Cannot find REALITY.SYS. Universe halted.
  18. Re:No Thanks, Microsoft. I'll Keep My Wii by loafula · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I, for one, am disappointed with the Wii. Zelda was great, but other good games are few. What happened to Smash Bros and Metroid being launch titles? Also, whats to prevent Sony and M$ from developing similar motion sensitive controllers (Sony is sorta doing it with the six axis)? If and when they do, with their far superior hardware, it will be bye-bye Wii. I can't help but feel the Wii is gimmicky. In the long run, I think it will suffer the same fate as the GameCube- a decent system with a FEW really good games and a bunch of crap.

    --
    FOXTROT UNIFORM CHARLIE KILO
  19. So what are the benefits of modding? by blindd0t · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First off, everybody should have seen this coming - they did this with the first XBox console.

    Second, what are the benefits (outside of copying games illegitimately and cheating) would you have by modding your XBox 360? I haven't had any incentive to purchase the 360 because outside of better graphics and new games, my old, mod'd XBox can provide me all the same functionality. At least with the first gen XBox, modding gave you DVD playback (without the need to purchase the stupid dongle), music and movie file playback (i.e. off a file server on the network), potential to install a full Linux distro like Xebian (and the potential to use it as a MythTV front-end), etc... I'm honestly curious to know how I could maximize my bang-for-my-buck by modding an XBox 360 - how else might I be able to use that hardware, similar to the old XBox?

    Additionally, no matter how much they try, there will always be people bent on cheating in live. Playing Halo 2 over my friend's Live account a few times was a crumby experience for me with the abundance of cheaters out there (and no, I'm not saying that b/c I'm a sore looser, but there comes a point in time that it is horribly obvious somebody is cheating), but I'm not so optimistic this will help much. Honestly, I have never purchased a live account, and I don't ever intend to purchase one (which is part of why I won't purchase a 360 - for that and other reasons).

    1. Re:So what are the benefits of modding? by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Well, the Xbox definitely isn't powerful enough to play 1080p60 H.264 video, for example, but the Xbox 360 should be able to. Therefore, porting XBMC to the 360 would help make a superb HD HTPC (minus recording from TV of course, but that could be dealt with via USB-based TV tuners or similar).

      Also, the Elite model has a much larger hard drive, so it requires less tinkering to get a decent amount of space on it for all your music, TV shows, films, etc.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    2. Re:So what are the benefits of modding? by melstav · · Score: 2, Informative

      Second, what are the benefits (outside of copying games illegitimately and cheating) would you have by modding your XBox 360?


      Specifically, we're talking about modding *the DVD drive*.

      One reason to install hacked firmware on the drive not at all related to game play is to be able to use it as a region-free DVD player. IE: allow you to watch a DVD regardless of which country it was marketed for.

      Conceivably, once someone successfully manages to port it, it will be possible to run Linux on your 360, as well... but I'm sure that will require a modification to the system board.
    3. Re:So what are the benefits of modding? by -noefordeg- · · Score: 1

      Benefits...

      Well.
      I would do whatever it takes to get the chat function in Xbox Live to work with more than two persons. The official word is that they have limited the chat to two persons because fear of overused bandwidth (they need at least 64kbps for games). That is what I hate with MS/closed source. People who know what is best for you.
      If a mod chip would let me use some other chat program or remove this immensly stupid artificial restriction I would buy it in a second.

      As for the old Xbox.
      With a mod chip it became one of the greatest pieces of hardware I've ever bought. Without a mod chip it was just an ok game console. I guess the same goes for X360.

    4. Re:So what are the benefits of modding? by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      Second, what are the benefits (outside of copying games illegitimately and cheating) would you have by modding your XBox 360?

      As someone else has already pointed out, it's not a moded 360, it's a moded DVD player. I don't know what it's being used for as far as games are concerned, but if I recall correctly isn't it a hack HD-DVD drive for the 360 that one of the groups has been using to retrieve HD-DVD keys? Perhaps this is a early strike by the MPAA through Microsoft to try to curb the widespread adoption of this attack?

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    5. Re:So what are the benefits of modding? by HaMMeReD3 · · Score: 1

      Noise, you can reduce all the fucken noise the console makes. The driver is super loud and can be reduced significantly in volume by lowering the read speed.

    6. Re:So what are the benefits of modding? by aegzorz · · Score: 1

      Linux already runs on the 360, http://www.free60.org/.

    7. Re:So what are the benefits of modding? by segafreak · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of import games? I'm a huge games fan (consoles, handhelds, PC, anything) and I'll happily import games if the import versions are better for some reason, or the game simply isn't available where I live (since I live in the UK, that accounts for more games than you'd think - Europe always gets the short straw). Modding any console allows you to play imports on it, which is pretty worthwhile to a lot of people. However, MS have every right to ban modded consoles from Live, as has been stated it's their service so you play by their rules. At the end of the day if you want a modded console and you want to play on live, it's time to buy 2 consoles.

      --
      "Everlasting peace will come to Earth when the last man kills the last but one." - Adolf Hitler
    8. Re:So what are the benefits of modding? by dabraun · · Score: 1

      That is what I hate with MS/closed source. People who know what is best for you.


      Yes, that's just what we need. People with different opinions of acceptable gameplay quality causing lag in everyone else's games because they want to have 'private chat' with four people at once. I agree that I don't like the limitation, but I also know that the games and the platform are tested with known boundary conditions to make them behave as well as possible for as many people as possible. Consoles are all about simplicity and consistency, if you start modding the console, even if it's not to cheat, you will break that. Of course, if you can mod the console in one way you can also mod it to cheat, and unless they take a strong stance on "no modded consoles on live" they can not prevent cheaters.
  20. Microshit, if you want a level playing field by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ban everyone. Then you will send everyone to the most level playing field of them all, the Wii platform.

  21. Re:No Thanks, Microsoft. I'll Keep My Wii by ShadowsHawk · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    And once again, you fail to realize that peripherals NEVER do well in the market place. The fact of the matter is that Both Sony and MS could develop their own motion sensing (Nintendo patented theirs), but it won't really catch on until the next generation when they bundle it.

  22. Re:Don't even bother! by fimbulvetr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Look, man, if you want it any more fair than a level playing ground, participate in the special Olympics. Microsoft might suck, a lot, but by no means is it obligated to help everyone feel better about themselves.

  23. Re:News stories by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

    I'm going to go out on a limb and say they only people with "Unmodded" xboxes that got banned are the ones who de-modded their xbox post-ban and are now trying to play it off as if they have no idea what happened.

    I'd do the same damn thing - in fact - I'll have to do the same damn thing if I can't get my original firmware restored. That mod is entirely the only reason I even have a floppy drive any more.

  24. The Sky is Falling by Higaran · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow, this actually looks like a PRO MS thread on /. and the other day I could swear that the last one about the Iphone was kind of negative to apple. *Does Not Compute* *Head Explodes*

    1. Re:The Sky is Falling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The apple fad is dying down.

    2. Re:The Sky is Falling by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the games section.

    3. Re:The Sky is Falling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I got modded down for criticising the XBox 360's DRM system.

      Guess I'd better avoid saying anything nasty about Sony and the RIAA from now on.

    4. Re:The Sky is Falling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's simple, we hate cheaters and theifs more than we hate Microsoft.

    5. Re:The Sky is Falling by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      +5, insightful.

      Sony's the "enemy" here. Microsoft is "saving us" from them.

  25. Their network, their rules..? by hejog · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Good. Don't mod stuff and expect to be able to play on microsofts network. The fact that people pay doesn't mean that you should be able to connect with modified hardware.

    I'm actually suprised this hasn't happened already...

  26. No, they couldn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If they didn't want you to mod the box at all, they could just brick it."

    Sure. And as soon as they did that, people would take it back to the store where they bought it and say "doesn't work".

    I'm not disagreeing with the policy of not allowing modded boxes on Live!, but to suggest that modding a box would be grounds to destroy my property is neither a legal or ethical.

    1. Re:No, they couldn't by joystickgenie · · Score: 1

      And the clerks at the store should look at it and see that the seals that prevent the case from being opened have been broken and respond to you "well it probably would if you didn't open in up and break it" and then send you on your way with your broken console.

      When the primary use (not only, but the vast majority) of moded equipment is to break copyrights and play game you have not obtained in a legal fashion, it is hard to say that it's unethical to stop you from continuing to use that hardware for services provided by the people that you are breaking the copyrights of and "obtaining" there software. I don't see this that different then those exploding ink capsules that banks use to protect their money. Sure they destroy the property of the people who set them off, but to set them off your first have to steal the money.

  27. Re:Not if you owned an HD TV by DrDitto · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You might not prefer a Wii if you owned a 50" HDTV. The difference is night-and-day. Its really too bad that Nintendo couldn't manage 720p.

  28. Re:No Thanks, Microsoft. I'll Keep My Wii by loafula · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ever play guitar hero? And what would prevent Sony or M$ from bundling a motion-sensitive controller in future releases of their consoles? In the end, it all comes down to the quality of the games available. I've owned a Wii since December, and I haven't seen anything other than Zelda that makes the console worth owning. And even that is just a GameCube game with and updated control scheme.

    --
    FOXTROT UNIFORM CHARLIE KILO
  29. Re:No Thanks, Microsoft. I'll Keep My Wii by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since it is selling really well a lot of support from big companies is bound to be coming.

  30. Coincidence? I think not... by Raistlin77 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Did nobody else find it seemingly coincidental that the banning of modded 360s was orchestrated through a game called "Crackdown"?

  31. Oh, didn't you get the memo? by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

    All anti-piracy measures are an affront to our liberty, punish legitimate users, and are a waste of money that the consumer has to pay for. Did I mention the slippery slope?

    --
    You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  32. "TrueSkill" Matchmaking on Live by jchapman16 · · Score: 1

    You're absolutely correct- if the games you play on Live were against any random player, you'd very likely be playing with someone with vastly different skills (either better or worse depending on how much time they play relative to you or other factors). That's why Microsoft implemented the "TrueSkill" system into the Live infrastructure; the games you play are usually against people of similar skill. For each game (and I believe also for each genre) you have a "trueskill" rating based on your gameplay. Matchmaking attempts to create matches between players of similar "trueskill" ratings (but it doesn't always work for low-population games or folks who haven't played a lot of games yet).

    Halo has it's own similar internal matchmaking system developed by Bungie that includes the ability to match "parties" of similar skill (that's not an ability built into the standard API all developers have access to).

  33. Re:No Thanks, Microsoft. I'll Keep My Wii by Kelbear · · Score: 1

    I agree that the Wii's game line-up is pretty weak right now, there are some good games on the horizon, but there is still a need for good third party IPs.

    However, considering the sales thus far in both hardware and game attach rates, (paraphrasing VG cats and Penny Arcade) I'm sure Nintendo is just crying all the way to the bank. Lying awake at night on pillows of money.

  34. Re:Sounds like a challenge to me by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I'd give it 48 hours before has a counter-mod for Microsoft's anti-mod mod.

    I think missed a word in that sentence.

    The only way to prevent bios hack detection on the original Xbox was to use a modchip with a switch, and actually switch to the official BIOS when playing on Live. Also you HAD to lock your HDD if you upgraded, because it would detected the unlocked drive.

    There's no reason to believe the 360 should be any different.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  35. Re:No Thanks, Microsoft. I'll Keep My Wii by GizmoToy · · Score: 1

    A purpose-built controller meant for one game doesn't really prove your point. A lot of DDR mats were sold too, but I don't see those being used for general gameplay, either.

    Developers aren't likely to support something that didn't come with the system as it limits the amount of people they can sell their game to. There's a reason why Guitar Hero came with the guitar.

  36. RTF EULA by Cathedral+Castle · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one that reads the verbose EULAs anymore? I thought that modded Xboxes of any generation were already banned from Live (I can't check the old EULA to be sure anymore beause the new one is up.) As someone previously stated, you buy the hardware and can do whatever you want with it, but Live is not hardware. (This doesn't touch on the fact that the dashboard is software that Microsoft probably claims is licensed rather than sold to you, and that they can revoke the license at any time.) I could add jet engines to my Camero, and as long as I rented a private airfield to use it I'd be fine. But my Jet-Camero wouldn't be street legal. And if it looked like Bumblebee when it turned into a robot, I'd have the MPAA, Hasbro, and Takara all after me. Wait, we were talking about Transformers, right? Anyway, you can mod all you want, but Live is the (pivately owned) public street, and mods aren't street legal.

    1. Re:RTF EULA by cpt.hugenstein · · Score: 1

      I could add jet engines to my Camero, and as long as I rented a private airfield to use it I'd be fine. But my Jet-Camero wouldn't be street legal. thant is not exactly true http://www.ronpatrickstuff.com/
    2. Re:RTF EULA by Firefly1 · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one that reads the verbose EULAs anymore?
      I'll see that good question and raise you another: if, as I believe, the readability and comprehensibility of these things has been studied (and found lacking), why has no effort been made to address it?

      And if it looked like Bumblebee when it turned into a robot, I'd have the MPAA, Hasbro, and Takara all after me.
      If you pulled that off, I think Hasbro and Takara would be after you all right... to negotiate an advertising contract (honestly, would you sue someone who's just gone and developed perhaps the best ad for the franchise?). And some other folks would be waving job offers and tech-licensing deals. The MPAA has no dog in this fight, and would hopefully be reminded of that very quickly.
      --
      - White Knight of the Order of Mihoshi Enthusiasts
  37. Re:No Thanks, Microsoft. I'll Keep My Wii by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Ever play guitar hero?"
    What? you can use the guitar for anything else than playing guitar hero?

    "And what would prevent Sony or M$ from bundling a motion-sensitive controller in future releases of their consoles?"
    pissing off previous customer?

    "In the end, it all comes down to the quality of the games available. I've owned a Wii since December, and I haven't seen anything other than Zelda that makes the console worth owning. And even that is just a GameCube game with and updated control scheme."
    Ever consider the fact that to develop a game it takes times?
    also you should have been prepared to buy a few concept games like Elebits to have a proper view of what the Wii is available, but since you're the kind of shallow gamer that won't see beyond grades given in "professional" reviews it won't happen

  38. A counter view -- your console is yours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This view will of course be 100% unpopular among the legions of Xbox Live faithful. But ...

    You purchased your own console, you didn't rent it as if it were a pure content delivery vehicle. As an outright purchase, it's your property to modify as you desire --- that's how the concept of property and purchases works in the west.

    If MS or any other games manufacturer wants to retain control over the delivery vehicle, then they should not sell them but lease or rent them out only, so that they remain their property. Once sold, the consoles are no longer their property to control.

    The fact that the Live fanboys have purchased their consoles as property and yet are perfectly happy to be shafted by MS as if the modified consoles had been rented merely says something about the distorted worldview of fanboys, that's all.

    1. Re:A counter view -- your console is yours by 3choTh1s · · Score: 1

      You are close but no cigar. If you have paid for your XBox360 and have modified it there is nothing Microsoft can do to dissuade you. They aren't coming to your house demanding you return the Xbox360. You still have a modified console. But Live is their service. They can and will not let anyone with modified consoles onto their service. Both are separate. I don't see the problem with this. If you want to make backups use modified firmware. If you want to use Live make sure you don't have modified firmware loaded. All the modchip type mods I've seen allow you to return the firmware back to stock so that you can use Live whenever you want. But this way you limit the number of cheaters on the system. Really it's nothing but good.

    2. Re:A counter view -- your console is yours by lantenon · · Score: 1

      .... But the network is Microsoft's: the fanboys bought the console (which they retain ownership of, even after this change) and can do with it what they wish, however they "rent" their access to Live, and as such have an agreement by which they must abide (TOS) or risk termination of their access. Why is this concept so difficult?

  39. Re:Not if you owned an HD TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree, you might not prefer a Wii if you're a graphics whore.

  40. Re:No Thanks, Microsoft. I'll Keep My Wii by loafula · · Score: 1

    Actually, I think the fact that people are willing to purchase a new peripheral that works on only two great games proves my point that people are willing to purchase new peripherals, if the games are there to support them, pretty darn well.

    --
    FOXTROT UNIFORM CHARLIE KILO
  41. Fair? by Graftweed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't see an problem with Microsoft banning people with DVD drives modified to play copied games. It makes it fair for the honest people who payed good money to play. I'm an honest person who has paid good money to play, I resent the implication that just because I make backup copies for personal use I'm a criminal and end up being locked out of a subset of the console's functionality.

    "We have stated in the past that customers can only enjoy access to the Xbox LIVE community through the use of a genuine, unmodified, Xbox console and we will continue to enforce this rule to ensure the integrity of our service, the protection of our partners and the benefits of our users." I fail to see how a modification of a DVD drive will somehow make it less fair on the rest of the people who use an online service.

    By the way, I don't even own an Xbox360, so I'm not whining Microsoft locked me out after having accepted their terms. However, I do consider that the ability to make backup copies falls under fair use of something I paid for, and which is unrelated (to anyone but Microsoft) to another service I might be purchasing from them (LIVE).
    1. Re:Fair? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Backup" just means "pirated". We all know it. Stop pretending.

  42. Will this hurt MS more than the users long term? by grapeape · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have a 360, havent flashed it because im rather picky about my games, I do have a friend who flashed his and now we cant play anymore. He is in Florida and im in Missouri but Live is the best way we have found to stay in touch.

    They may have lost sales of a game or two from him but they are now going to loose his annual live subscription and the ton of xbox points he goes through. He is the one who talked me into buying my first live arcade game (Settlers of Catan) and he seems to buy every game they put out. I talked to him this morning and he is now talking PS3, I cant help but wonder how many thousands of live users will now do the same? I dont have a problem with fighting piracy but MS may be cutting off it's nose to spite it's face.

  43. Re:Don't even bother! by swillden · · Score: 1

    Look, man, if you want it any more fair than a level playing ground, participate in the special Olympics. Microsoft might suck, a lot, but by no means is it obligated to help everyone feel better about themselves.

    Of course not, but I have to wonder if there isn't some good money to be made in creating on-line games that minimize the advantages of the hardcore players. The casual, few-hours-per-week market is where the best return on investment is, the hardcore gamers don't pay any more money but use lots more system capacity. If someone can find a way to make sure the game is enjoyable for people who have a life, they'll do well.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  44. ... and ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...
    [crickets]

    Well, it was a reasonable theory.

  45. Re:Not if you owned an HD TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I want to look at pretty pictures, I'll go to the art gallery. Games should either move fast enough or require enough attention that you're not staring at the gloss. In my opinion anyway.

  46. Re:No Thanks, Microsoft. I'll Keep My Wii by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Microsoft wants your Wii?

    Well, Balmer didn't look that kinky, but you know what they say about people in top management positions and their rather curious sexual preferences... Hey, to each their own, but at least do it in the bathroom when you're doing it in a hotel, please!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  47. Modder Server by LoudMusic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Instead of outright banning them why don't they send them to their own server? That way they can still keep track of who they are and perhaps not clue the modders in to the fact that MS knows that they've modded their box. MS could even run some well written bots to populate the server and totally kick the modders' asses. It could be a fun side project for the game developers (:

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    1. Re:Modder Server by Mikey-San · · Score: 1

      Instead of outright banning them why don't they send them to their own server? That way they can still keep track of who they are and perhaps not clue the modders in to the fact that MS knows that they've modded their box. MS could even run some well written bots to populate the server and totally kick the modders' asses. It could be a fun side project for the game developers (:

      You have never worked on a game before, I take it. Especially not a console game. I'm working on an Xbox 360 title at the moment, and I can say that this would be a complete and utter waste of development resources.

      What's better, spending some of your resources (either as Microsoft or the game developer) to help accomodate cheaters, or focusing all of your efforts on making honest players get the best possible experience?

      --
      Mikey-San
      Karma: +Eleventy billion (mostly affected by watching Celebrity Jeopardy)
    2. Re:Modder Server by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it costs money to set up and the only real benefit to MS is to sit there laughing at the cheaters all playing each other. Given the proportion of people running modded XBoxes, I doubt they'd see the money back out of "number of people with modded XBoxes who haven't cancelled their Live subscription because they can still log on".

    3. Re:Modder Server by overkill1024 · · Score: 1

      I have a similar thought to this. I can't believe I'm about to do this but I'm goinf to praise Valve for getting it right. When someone creates a server for a Valve game they have to option of enabeling the VAC (Valve anti-cheat) thing. Only people playing on VAC-enabled servers with a modified game will be banned and once they are banned they are only banned from VAC-enabled servers. Then, although I'd never want to deal with it, there is a system for appeals. I think Microsoft should follow this policy but they are likely more concerned with detering piracy than cheating simply because a console isn't as easely modified to facilitate cheating, or so I think. At least the 360 doesn't require an internet connection, plus there's always Xbox connect. (virtual lan, not Live but it's 'free')

    4. Re:Modder Server by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it costs money to set up and the only real benefit to MS is to sit there laughing at the cheaters all playing each other. Sounds priceless to me :)

      Also, there could be an actual benefit by not having to get into an arms race with the modders. If the modders don't know they are caught, they won't seek out another mod. Besides all that, the idea doesn't sound all that expensive. They're already detecting the modded systems and taking action.
  48. Dude, that's what I'm saying! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, you totally misunderstood what I just said. I mean, you completely missed the point.

    No, I don't want Microsoft to muddle in these games to try to make it "fairer". I don't care if this fairness inequality is due to some South Korean kid who can practice Halo for 12 hours each day. I don't care if this fairness inequality is due to some South Korean kid who stuck a modchip in his Xbox 360. Regardless, the result is the same: a fairness inequality. And that's something I don't think Microsoft should be trying to change.

    Here you are, saying that Microsoft is not obligated to make anyone feel better. But that's exactly what they're trying to do by banning these modded Xbox 360s! Can you make up your mind, please? Either you want them to try to bring a level of equality, or you don't. But please, try to be consistent with what you're saying.

  49. Re:No Thanks, Microsoft. I'll Keep My Wii by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Publishing a motion controller AFTER the console is out the door is pointless.

    Any kind of "specialized" controller for a console was a failure so far. The reason is simple: Lack of games. If the controller is not a definite part of the package, game studios are wary to produce for it, because to sell the game, the customer would have to buy the game AND the controller. And that in turn only pays off for the customer, if he can play more than one single game with that controller. Few games are SO awesome that they warrant paying 100 bucks and more for it (game + controller), so the customer will think twice before buying a game and look around whether there are other games supporting this controller. If there are none, your game is a brick in a display case.

    And since all studios think that way and wait for the others to release games for the special controller...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  50. Re:Don't even bother! by mollymoo · · Score: 1

    It's hardly "fair and level" as it is now. I mean, there are some kids on there who I presume play Halo for at least eight or nine hours each day. They can always beat those of us who can only ever manage perhaps an hour or two a week, due to us holding, you know, a job.

    I don't think you understand what a 'fair and level playing field' actually means. It does not mean everybody has the same skill level, it means that the system (console, games, Live...) does not provide an advantage to any player over any other player. Modifying any of those to provide an advatage which another player does not have would make for an uneven playing field. The fact that circumstances beyond Microsoft's control mean you can't practice as much as others has nothing whatsoever to do with the 'playing field'. The level of ability, skill and practice which you bring to the playing field is your problem, not Microsoft's.

    --
    Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  51. Modding and cheating are entirely separate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    - The fact that you're cheating in games can be a valid reason for being banned.

    - The fact that you've modified your personal property does NOT imply that you're cheating.

    Many Xboxes are modified to run media players, and their owners have no interest at all in cheating, whatsoever. Penalizing those players is completely without justification and unfair.

    Running a modified media player is very much a positive technical pursuit, whereas cheating is ... well, only admired by cheats. Please don't equate the two.

    This is just a case of MS flexing its muscle to show who's boss --- don't try to rationalize it as being somehow "fair" and "right". It might catch some cheats, but it's also penalizing huge numbers of non-cheating players, entirely unfairly.

  52. Re:Don't even bother! by brkello · · Score: 1

    Are you stupid? I don't know why I ask that because the answer is obvious.

    Should the person who practices more be better at something? If you go out to a soccer field and play against people who play every day when you play once a month...do you expect them to all get on their knees to make up for your inability?

    And quite frankly, what you say isn't even right. I work a full time job, own a house that keeps me real busy, and I can get on any fps and be at the top. I think you just suck at these types of games. Try an RPG...that way you can level up if something is too hard for you.

    Disclaimer: not putting down RPGs, I play and love them. This guy should just stay away from multiplayer FPS because it actually takes some hand/eye coordination.

    --
    Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
  53. Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft can't be bothered to patch dozens of security holes or flaws within their Operating Systems that are used by millions of people daily for production work... but hey, we wouldn't want someone to cheat in a video game- better fix that asap!

  54. Re:Will this hurt MS more than the users long term by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's an idea, leave the damn Xbox360 alone. Don't flash it, hack it, mod it. Use it for it's intended purpose - to play games you pay for. Given that, you're "friend" won't have any other issues.

    Losers.

  55. Re:Not if you owned an HD TV by DrDitto · · Score: 1

    LOL! A gaming luddite! Why not just go back to CGA graphics with only 4 colors?

  56. Re:Not if you owned an HD TV by DrDitto · · Score: 1

    Yes, better graphics sucks. The Atari 2600, with its innovative paddle controllers, is so superior to the PS3 with its yesterday controllers.

  57. Re:Will this hurt MS more than the users long term by svendsen · · Score: 1

    If you want his product then it has value to you. If something has value to you then you are willing to barter for it or will take it. Your morals will dictate which path you choose. Let's look at the other side. How many subscribers would they LOSE if they allowed modified Xboxes to stay on the system? All of my friends with 360s would jump ship.

  58. Re:Will this hurt MS more than the users long term by grapeape · · Score: 1

    While I completely agree, hindsight is 20/20. He's now faced with either spending $499 to get back on live or spend $100 bucks more to get a ps3. What I thought was kind of funny was that he had to spend $60 on crackdown to get code that got him banned. Oh well at least im getting a game out of it, I offered to buy crackdown from him, I wasnt going to buy a game for a 2 week beta, but now I hear its actaully a decent one.

    I know when the elite came out there were problems with the data transfers and live arcade. Anyone know if the stuff he downloaded would be ok on a new 360 if he just bought a core and stuck his HDD in it?

  59. Re:Don't even bother! by sunking2 · · Score: 1

    Isn't that what the ranked online playing attempts to do? I've never really used it but I believe it tries to locate people of the same approximate skill level to play against. I'm sure others have more insight. I don't use it because its quicker just to jump right into a random game.

  60. Newb question. by EchaniDrgn · · Score: 1

    Is it possible to "Un-hack" your 360? I was considering buying a refurbished 360 and didn't know what recourse I'd have if I found myself with a hacked box.

    1. Re:Newb question. by stratjakt · · Score: 0

      Once it's banned, it's banned, even if you reverse the mod, it has a unique id in there.

      the first gen had it on a prom that also used it as the HDD key, and you could buy the prom and matching HDD, to "unlock" your xbox by giving it a new ID.

      It's better/easier in the long run to buy one for modding, one for xbox live.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  61. Their network, their rules by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Its their network, they can make any rule they want for you to connect. Not much to see here.

    Now, if they start remotely disabling the console that you bought and paid for, then we have some news.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  62. Re:No Thanks, Microsoft. I'll Keep My Wii by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cough Guitar Hero cough

  63. Re:Love to See a Class Action Suit by SeattleGameboy · · Score: 3, Informative

    First, you need to step a way from that pipe, get sober and calm down.

    Second, if you actually listened to yourself, then you would realize how ridiculous your argument is. There is a clear contract when you sign up for the Xbox Live service. It says, if you mod your box, you are not eligible for the service. Case closed.

    For a comparison, if you buy a car and you make a modification that is not authorized by the manufacturer, your warranty is null and void. And that is a rule that has been tested many times in the court of law.

    Good luck trying to get a lawyer.

  64. proofread much? by nuzak · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has now officially started banning Xbox 360s that have had their DVD drive firmware modified from Live

    Gosh, then why are they letting people modify their firmware from Live?

    --
    Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
  65. Kudos to MS by thanksforthecrabs · · Score: 1

    I pay good money for games and the live service. I don't want to lose to cheaters. They are protecting both of our interests.

  66. Re:Love to See a Class Action Suit by Firefly1 · · Score: 1
    Maybe; however, I believe the following portion thereof merits some discussion:

    Still another can 'o worms is when someone sells a modded box on eBay without mentioning that it's banned from XBox Live. Who gets sued now? Is MS doing all they should be doing to warn people that all XBoxes are not treated equally?
    If the seller does not disclose both facts (that it is a modded 360 and it is exiled from Live), I believe that's sufficient fodder for a lawsuit. Where the first, but not second, fact is disclosed, ther might be less of a case if it is widely known that such 360s get exiled.
    Back to the first case: aside from getting out of the suit funds sufficient to buy a new 360, what recourse does this notional plaintiff have? Would it be practical for Microsoft to set up a system where such individuals can send the offending console along with apporpirate documentation and get a new unit in exchange?
    More generally, I am curious as to the false-positive rate of whatever mechanism is used to determine 'is this a modded 360?'.
    --
    - White Knight of the Order of Mihoshi Enthusiasts
  67. Re:Will this hurt MS more than the users long term by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

    >They may have lost sales of a game or two from him but they are now going to loose his annual live subscription

    In other words:We should allow automobile theft because thieves buy gas too.

  68. Re:Will this hurt MS more than the users long term by grapeape · · Score: 1

    Not at all, as I said I agree and I buy all my games (I have 14 boxed ones and 2 live arcade titles). MS does loose money on the hardware so making them buy a new one will hurt them, and loosing live revenue for those that decide to just keep pirating and forgo live hurts them as well, so this is a gutsy move that while I think its right it could have damaging reprecutions for MS that outweight be benefits of getting rid of the pirates.

  69. It's their network, but not anything goes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's their network, why shouldn't they ban people that don't play by their rules?

    Using your logic, they should be allowed to detect people with disabilities and send them an electric shock, right? After all, it's their network, they have the full right to penalize people with slow reaction times. Hey, that's even fun. It's their network after all!!!

    Or is that pretty poor logic? :P

    Well assuming that you're slightly rational, you'll realize from the above counter-example that it's not true that "anything goes" just because it's their network. Some things are proper and fair, and other things are not.

    Cheating is unfair, and to ban cheaters has firm justification.

    But modding a console does not imply cheating --- it's very common indeed to mod Xboxes as media players, without in any shape or form having any interest whatsoever in cheating. And those consoles are the personal property of the people who bought them, and not the property of Microsoft to control as they will.

    So what it comes down to is this. They are morally justified to ban people for cheating. They are NOT morally justified to ban people purely for modifying their own personal property in ways that do not affect online play.

    Of course they have the POWER to do so anyway, and it's no surprise that they flex their muscles just to prove who's boss. But that doesn't make it right.

    1. Re:It's their network, but not anything goes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow...stay away from programming...please...or any other logic based application...

      I don't even know how you got from the point to you "counter-point" but it makes
      absolutely no sense at all.

      I have now written and deleted three different responses to your post, but I am stuck by rules of common sense and logic. I don't even know what point you were making. Physical disabilities are like...wait, ummm, banning people is like beating cripples...hmm...no, um, you really don't like MS, that is probably on, but still not sure...

  70. Re:Love to See a Class Action Suit by Verte · · Score: 0

    Selling the machines at a loss does not mean they lose more money the more they sell. The hardware sells at a profit, while it's one-off stuff they are still paying for, like R&D, design, and testing, not to mention reasonably fixed price stuff like marketing. If they were to sell enough Xsoxes they would actually make up the loss.

    --
    We at slashdot are scientists, specialists and kernel hackers. Your FUD will be found out.
  71. Re:News stories by d3ac0n · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    about people with UNmodded Xbox 360's that get erroneously banned start in 3... 2... 1...

    What? You don't think it will happen? Think about Windows Genuine Advantage for a few seconds and then get back to me, mmmkay?


    For some reason this was modded -1 Troll.

    How in hell was that comment a Troll?

    The Microsoft fanboys must have mod points today.
    --
    Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
  72. Re:Will this hurt MS more than the users long term by SeaEye420 · · Score: 1

    He's now faced with either spending $499 to get back on live or spend $100 bucks more to get a ps3.

    What Xbox 360 SKU is $499? Do you have a link or are you just trolling? Oh, of course you're trolling because you refer to the core console that "your friend" would obviously be interested in if he's looking to get back on Live cheaply :)

    Yes, your (friend's) content will still work on a new core console with the old HD, that how all of us who are on our 2nd(3rd, 10th, whatever) console do it, you just have to be signed in to live.

    --
    Wort Wort Wort!
  73. Re:Will this hurt MS more than the users long term by prockcore · · Score: 1

    While I completely agree, hindsight is 20/20


    So is foresight in this case. MS banned modded versions of the original xbox from live. It's not a surprise that they'd do the same with the 360.
  74. Re:No Thanks, Microsoft. I'll Keep My Wii by orclevegam · · Score: 1

    Any kind of "specialized" controller for a console was a failure so far.

    *cough*guitar hero*cough*

    Not that I disagree with your general sentiment, but there are exceptions.

    --
    Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
  75. Re:Coincidence? I think not... by bogjobber · · Score: 1
    Did nobody else find it seemingly coincidental that the banning of modded 360s was orchestrated through a game called "Crackdown"?

    Yes, I did find it coincidental. But I do not think that word means what you think it means.

  76. Nice analogy by paladinwannabe2 · · Score: 1

    Too bad you upset someone with it. Maybe someone with less sympathy for cheaters will mod you back up again.

    --
    You are reading a copy of my copyrighted post.
  77. Re:Love to See a Class Action Suit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, but you're entirely wrong.

  78. Re:Will this hurt MS more than the users long term by Osty · · Score: 1

    Not at all, as I said I agree and I buy all my games (I have 14 boxed ones and 2 live arcade titles). MS does loose money on the hardware so making them buy a new one will hurt them, and loosing live revenue for those that decide to just keep pirating and forgo live hurts them as well, so this is a gutsy move that while I think its right it could have damaging reprecutions for MS that outweight be benefits of getting rid of the pirates.

    This is where it gets interesting -- the console is banned, not the account. His account is still active, and most likely set up to automatically renew year after year. Unless he calls 1-800-4-MY-XBOX and cancels his account, it will keep on renewing every year until his credit card expires. While that sounds a little nasty on Microsoft's part, it does make sense. Most people are quite attached to their Live accounts, given the popularity of achievements. Even a console modder probably wouldn't want to lose his account, so they don't ban it. That leaves you with three choices:

    1. Buy a new console and don't modify it.
    2. Buy a new console, modify it, get banned, repeat.
    3. Cancel your account.
    The choice is up to you

    Oh, yeah, and it's "losing", not "loosing".

  79. Re:Love to See a Class Action Suit by Osty · · Score: 1

    For a comparison, if you buy a car and you make a modification that is not authorized by the manufacturer, your warranty is null and void. And that is a rule that has been tested many times in the court of law.

    If you're going to use a car analogy, use a valid one. Manufacturers are required by law to honor your warranty, even with modifications, so long as the modification did not cause the problem that needs fixed. For example, installing a cat-back exhaust or a short shifter will not void warranty repair for a steering issue, just as replacing your suspension will not void warranty repair for an engine or transmission problem.

    Given that, the analogy can still make sense -- a portion of your warranty will be invalidated with modifications made to your car, just as a portion of the 360 experience (Live access) will be invalidated with modifications to your console. Your car will still drive and your console will still play games.

  80. I Read EULA's, and They Suck by lmnfrs · · Score: 1

    I still read EULA's and the like from time to time. I read the note on my original Xbox that said I wasn't allowed to play my games on other peoples Xboxes. I laughed, and decided Microsoft was so out-of-its-mind restrictive in their claims about what I could and could not do that I have never read or adhered to their rules since.

    This action by Microsoft isn't surprising in the least, but there are people who have a legitimate reason for modding their console. If they connect to Live right now and are banned, they are getting screwed.

  81. Re:Love to See a Class Action Suit by SeattleGameboy · · Score: 1

    If the seller does not disclose both facts (that it is a modded 360 and it is exiled from Live), I believe that's sufficient fodder for a lawsuit.

    Yes, you can sue the seller. But you won't have any grounds to sue MS or Xbox Live.

    Back to the first case: aside from getting out of the suit funds sufficient to buy a new 360, what recourse does this notional plaintiff have?


    Why should MS refund you for doing something that they were clear on what the consequences were and you did it anyway? You modded the box out of free-will, nobody forced you to do it. Xbox Live has ALWAYS been clear about banning modded Xboxes. So why should MS eat the cost for your willful violation?
  82. Re:No Thanks, Microsoft. I'll Keep My Wii by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    As I said, there are a few killer games that were so unique and popular that the controller sold due to a single game. GH and DDR are the notable exceptions.

    But how many others failed? Nintendo's first attempt at a "dance mat" for their ancient console, the lightguns for various consoles, eye toy, the list goes on. For every one successful controller gadget, there are dozens of dead weighs.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  83. Re:Not if you owned an HD TV by Monkey · · Score: 1

    There's this game I know that you might enjoy. It's called Pong.

  84. Re:Love to See a Class Action Suit by Firefly1 · · Score: 1
    I owe an apology, it seems. First, for assuming (and we know what 'assume' breaks down into) that in this statement...

    If the seller does not disclose both facts (that it is a modded 360 and it is exiled from Live), I believe that's sufficient fodder for a lawsuit.
    ...it was clear that the defendant in said suit would be the seller, not Microsoft. And in the case of

    Back to the first case: aside from getting out of the suit funds sufficient to buy a new 360, what recourse does this notional plaintiff have?
    for failing to make crystal clear that the 'first case' refers to the first scenario I had cited earlier (when someone sells a 360 without mentioning that it was 1: modded; and 2: exiled from Live).
    --
    - White Knight of the Order of Mihoshi Enthusiasts
  85. Re:No Thanks, Microsoft. I'll Keep My Wii by orclevegam · · Score: 1

    For every one successful controller gadget, there are dozens of dead weighs.

    The same could also be said for games in general.

    --
    Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
  86. Mod parent up - Informative by __aawkdb2598 · · Score: 1

    *NP*

  87. Re:No Thanks, Microsoft. I'll Keep My Wii by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    True, but how much harder is it for a game to sell when the price tag is almost twice that of a "normal" game? It has to be an extremely good game to sell.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  88. Re:No Thanks, Microsoft. I'll Keep My Wii by brkello · · Score: 1

    I really don't understand what is wrong with you people. Why is that in every conversation that has something to do with the PS3 or XBOX360 you have to talk about your Wii? Ahh, I was mad...but after reading what I just wrong I can't help but laugh.

    --
    Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
  89. Re:Love to See a Class Action Suit by brkello · · Score: 2

    Uh, no. The thing is, you won't even get positive support on Slashdot of all places for this. People hate cheaters more than they hate copy protection. As far as used Xbox's go, it is buyer beware...that has nothing to do with MS. I also think the 360 might be making a small profit at this point. I don't think MS is worried about the prospect of having more units sold even if it is at a loss. It makes them a more attractive target for developers. More games means more appeal means more sales means more money for MS's money vault.

    --
    Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
  90. Re:Love to See a Class Action Suit by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

    There is a clear contract when you sign up for the Xbox Live service. It says, if you mod your box, you are not eligible for the service. Case closed.

    I don't believe an EULA dispute has ever made it to court, but I may be wrong. Also, just because there's a contract doesn't mean "case closed". People with contract disputes go to court all of the time.

    For a comparison, if you buy a car and you make a modification that is not authorized by the manufacturer, your warranty is null and void. And that is a rule that has been tested many times in the court of law.

    I don't believe the situation is a simple as you believe. From what I understand, the manufacturer must show that your modification resulted in the problem that you're trying to have fixed under warranty. For example, I just bought a used Firebird that had after-market exhaust tips installed on it. If I now have engine problems the dealer can't point at the tips and claim the engine's not covered anymore. Now, if I had screwed with the air intake or installed custom headers I'd probably be out of luck.

  91. whoa, dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one that reads the verbose EULAs anymore?

    You read those? I can't even read the rest of your post.
  92. Re:Will this hurt MS more than the users long term by SailorRipley · · Score: 1

    Here's a thought...

    there are plenty of people out there who use it for it's intended purpose: to play games they paid for, and yet still have a modded xbox

    uh oh, there goes your brilliant argument, and your justification for calling them losers...

    --
    Chance favors the prepared mind...especially when you Question Authority
  93. Modified XBox Servers + API == Second Life Killer? by jerryasher · · Score: 1

    Instead of outright banning them why don't they send them to their own server? That way they can still keep track of who they are and perhaps not clue the modders in to the fact that MS knows that they've modded their box. MS could even run some well written bots to populate the server and totally kick the modders' asses.

    I think it would be great fun to allow gamers to actively develop the system. They could work to establish various limits. Work to undo other restrictions, and they could even create a market place for the best hacks.

    Look what Hiro Protagonist did for sword fighting in the metaverse by removing the restriction that kept one object from passing through another object.

  94. Re:Not if you owned an HD TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of us are happy with our wiis and don't have a screaming urge to compensate it with a 50" TV.

  95. Re:Not if you owned an HD TV by tprime · · Score: 1

    I don't think there really is an arguement, or even a discussion, about whether or not the 360's graphics are an order of magentude better than the Wii's. They simply are. I can't speak for everyone on this, but I do have a 50" Panasonic plasma and the graphics aren't the reason why I bought the Wii....

    --
    http://www.tomandemily.com
  96. Flamebait my ass by BillGatesLoveChild · · Score: 1

    Every security system invented by corporate programmers has been defeated by hackers. Latest case in point AACS, and before that CCS, WGA, not to mention modded XBOXes themselves.

    Next time you are given 5 mod points, try and spend them wisely.

  97. Re:Will this hurt MS more than the users long term by grapeape · · Score: 1

    oops "your" right its $399 for premium, sorry havent shopped for one since I picked up a platinum shortly after launch and didnt remember. $299 for core, guess thats a decent fine for his being a dumb ass...thank "you" for correcting me. "You've" gone through 2-3 consoles...how on earth did "you" manage that? I know some early ones had problems with the red ring but I figured most of those were the result of people jacking with them. I guess I just got lucky, no problems with mine and its over a year old now.

  98. Re:No Thanks, Microsoft. I'll Keep My Wii by vuffi_raa · · Score: 1

    screw this thread I going to play my wii..... whoa wtf- where- note reads: "accordance with the new DMCA your wii has been confiscated signed: microsoft." DAMN YOU MICROSOFT!!!!!

  99. Re:No Thanks, Microsoft. I'll Keep My Wii by GizmoToy · · Score: 1

    My point was that no other games came out to support those peripherals and no other developers incorporated those peripherals into their games. People buy them because they want to play THAT game.

    It makes absolutely no difference whatsoever if people buy the add-ons if they're not supported, and developers have shown over and over that they are basically unwilling to develop for hardware that didn't come with the system. That's the real issue, and what you're missing.

  100. Re:No Thanks, Microsoft. I'll Keep My Wii by vuffi_raa · · Score: 1

    last week I met my wii after work, we went to a movie and dinner. I liked the place but wii said that the chicken was a little dry and our service was slow. I took wii's wiimote in my hand and gazed at her beautiful glowing disc feeder. As I held wii I whispered gently to her "I love you wii" as she hummed sweetly in my ear. Needless to say I felt for wii what I have never felt for a console before. After a ride in the park in a horse drawn carriage I could see that wii was a bit low on batteries so we took a cab home and held each other for hours. We laughed together and told stories of your youth and family- she told me about her immigrant grandparents famicom and nes, needless to say I was impressed how far she came to be with me. Then we dimmed the lights and made love. I could feel her rumble pack tremble at my touch as I slid my hands along her sleek ivory details. the rest I can't go into, but I can say this I love my wii.

  101. sp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    inept

    not

    inapt

  102. Anyone Care to Help Out? by AUDIOMIND · · Score: 1

    Where does one find out how to mod an Xbox360?

  103. Re:Will this hurt MS more than the users long term by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

    The Elite is $479 before taxes/shipping (though he notably didn't include taxes/shipping in his PS3 estimate, so I guess you can't just tack them on here to get that magic $499)

    --

    --

    WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
  104. You can't make that assumption. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a superficial assumption.

    All the TVs in my home, my family's home, and my siblings' homes are HDTVs from 37" 16:9 LCD to 32" 4:3 CRT to 65" 16:9 RPCRT, except for things like kitchen TVs. We all prefer our Wii systems (3 combined total, hopefully 3 more when we can get them). That includes two gamers who have spent a lot of time and money on video games since the 80s, AND my parents, AND a few parents of children from 8 to 15. It's simply the more fun system, especially when we play together (in which case it's the only system we play together). This past Easter was a HUGE Wii weekend for all of us, for example. Even a death anniversary family gathering that we had a couple months ago ended up with us playing Wii Bowling.

    On the other hand, we have two 360s, and that's [more than] enough for the hardcore gamers among us. I do not prefer mine to my Wii, regardless of the fact that they are both connected by component cables to my 57" HDTV. In fact, the first reason I bought it was because I didn't want to build another HTPC for media streaming. Funny enough, I'm now in the middle of an inexpensive and silent X2-4400+ 65W build for just this purpose, so I expect the 360 will be getting even less use from me going forward (certainly much less so far than my Wii, PS2, DS, and older systems).

  105. Re:Not if you owned an HD TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, now I see. You're one of those "I really don't get it" kind of people.

  106. A few days into the stray of the events unfolding by masticina · · Score: 2

    Well obviously this has hit quite a few fans. Some though did take the damage and are now selling "off line versions" of the xbox 360 second hand. As long as they say that you cant play on line with it! It can be a good deal!

    Some seem to think that they can play foul with the EEPROM to change the serial. Except..few know where the serial is hidden on an xbox360. And some are waiting for the mod scene to find a solution.

    So that is what has become of it..

    My point here is that though with the original xbox you really added allot of extra functions that made it a much sweeter box. And even though many lost their on line access through bans then they kept their own ones as media machines.

    So what do the firmware and other mods for the xbox360 really bring in? Oh you can play "backup games"! Mmmm except that backup games is by far not the right wording. Illegal copy is more a right word.

    The USA after all got DMCA right, that prohibits the cracking of security, how inept in design it might be to get to the content. And guess what on the disc stands "make no unauthorized copies"

    The unmodded xbox 360 already is a media monster by using the legal tools available for it. So the mods really only allow people to use Verbatim coasters as "play discs". And the first game hacks already been shown with Gears of War!

    Remember nobody pays either Microsoft or the developers of the games for the copied disc! Making a high quality game takes lots of cash and lots of time! And yes games are expensive but unlike food or clean water, you don't need games to life. If you are to poor well to bad you are to poor to buy them! Buying copies only kills the few good game studios that are left :!

    And the "but fair use". Sorry DMCA killed Fair use! Complain to your local politician if you want that changed!

    The "This will cost Microsoft allot of money" issue also is a joke! Really would anybody cry when cheap freeloaders that doesn't give the game studios their due cant use 30% of what makes the xbox360 a good console. It isn't as if you did pay money to the developers.

    All in all a good clean sweep to show the real appreciation to those that try to make good value possible, sure games can be expensive but a game you bought in full is more satisfying then one you got on a verbatim DVD from your "nephew". It isn't as if you had any time to begin with to play out all the 99 games you "own"

    Nothing like a cleansing storm to take away the dust and troubles isn't it? I wish all those that stayed on the legal side allot of fun with Crackdown and Halo 3 Beta! You are lucky!

    Masticina Akicta,

    --
    Codefile Defected to another Hexadimal Range refresh your CHAOSTACK.NLM file with a new copy
  107. Parent is full of sheet by XSforMe · · Score: 1

    opponents with auto-aiming snipers that shoot through walls. Or even if they can just fly (a far more rare and less threatening occurrence that is nonetheless not an exaggeration. As long as stuff like that exists banning modded 360's from live is a good way to protect the greatest part of your paying customer base from such behavior.

    The only public available mod that allows you to run unsigned code, requires your 360 to be at certain kernel level. Logging into Live automatically updates your 360 kernel and burns a fuser, which prevents you from going back to the compromised kernel version. To the best of my understanding there are no mods out there which will allow you to run unsigned 360 code and connect to Live, much less allow you to run cheats or hacks.

    Modding your DVD BIOS will only allow you to run copies of signed DVD games. This move is aimed at exclusively at killing piracy, not at easing hacking of from the 360.

    --
    My other OS is the MCP!
  108. I got banned boo hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I GOT BANNED 1ST DAY and I never cheated but I was playing burned games but man when they banned me they F&*#ed up my system by blocking my XBOX 360 MAC address from even connecting to the internet. NOW THATS where they crossed the line...... I cant even connect on KAI or XBC so now they are forcing me to bring my xbox to my MODder and we gotta try and change the MAC into a working address I hope i dont take someone elses MAC off the top. bann me off of LIVE but dont screw with my MAC address