Slashdot Mirror


Apple Patents 'Buy Stuff Wirelessly, Skip Lines' Tech

An anonymous reader writes "Apple is looking to patent a process that will save customers the hassle of waiting to order a cup of coffee at a local Starbucks. Even better: The technology would let you jump the line of those ordering in person. 'Customers might tap a button to order their favorite drink, say a double-shot mocha, as they stroll up to the nearest coffee shop. When the drink is ready go to, the device--such as an iPhone--would chime or blink to let the thirsty one know it's time to scoop up the order at the counter. The patent puts Apple's partnership with Starbucks in a new light. The technology promises to morph Apple from the business of simply selling gadgets and music and movies that can be played on those devices into an intermediary in all kinds of exchanges.'"

254 comments

  1. Obvious patents by WillRobinson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think this is an obvious patent. Wish I would have decided to be a lawyer instead of a technical person. My retirement would be much better.

    1. Re:Obvious patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems pretty novel to me. Who is doing this already with mobile apps?

    2. Re:Obvious patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but then it wouldn't be too obvious to you.

    3. Re:Obvious patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You are, every time you place an order via a web-based client from a mobile device. I did so a few weeks ago from my local Papa John's. Hell, calling in a take-out order from the restaurant of your choice would probably qualify as prior art.

      Replacing a human component with a piece of software shouldn't be considered novel enough to patent.

    4. Re:Obvious patents by vimh42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Forget about the patent being obvious. If I'm standing in line, and some idiot comes into the store and gets their drink first because they ordered it with their iPhone, do you think I'm going to have anything nice to say when I have a little chat with the manager about customer service? Don't you think that type of problem is a little obvious?

    5. Re:Obvious patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Plus Zaxby's already passes out little pagers after you order-- then you go get your drink, pick a table, wait for the lights to flash and go pick up your order. If you had ordered in advance by phone or internet, you would have this already at Zaxby's.

    6. Re:Obvious patents by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What is the problem?
      I do this all the time. My local grocery store deli takes phone orders. I often call them when I am in the store and place my order. They have a line for phone orders. I often see a huge line and I just call in my order, finish the rest of my shopping and pick up my sub.
      I also have a few restaurants in my cell phone that I go to often. They allow you to call ahead to reserve your place in line. I call when I leave my house and often I have no wait for a table.
      I thought using technology was a good thing.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    7. Re:Obvious patents by ReclusiveGeek · · Score: 1

      Amen. Even MORE obvious day-to-day activities made into a "patent". They just don't get that offering it up under the guise of a patent doesn't make it all that clever. Call this one bullshit.

    8. Re:Obvious patents by rucs_hack · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the main reason for registering such a patent is most likely defensive. Apple have had lots of experience being hammered in stupid patent suites, as have many tech companies, so if they have a patent, however vague, they can use it to prevent expensive lawsuits.

      Not that this justifies silly patents, but it does provide a reason for their registration.

    9. Re:Obvious patents by be-fan · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with that? They get their drink first because they _ordered_ it first.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    10. Re:Obvious patents by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      So they are going to donate it to one of those "good" (I don't mean that sarcastically) patent holders? Wish I could remember the name of one.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    11. Re:Obvious patents by dannannan · · Score: 1

      This is especially obvious since people already use their phones to order & buy things in places like Japan. Hopefully the patent system allows for prior art from outside the US?

    12. Re:Obvious patents by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

      touché sir.

      I am forced to agree, but I have a nieve hope that some sense will be made of this problem. Until then I think that defensive patents will be registered. Probably these will worsen the problem, but can you find any reason why a tech company wouldn't do it?

    13. Re:Obvious patents by Divebus · · Score: 1

      Seems pretty novel to me. Who is doing this already with mobile apps?

      Go to Japan or other advanced Asian country. They're very wired in like this between cell phones and walkup commerce. Maybe not exactly like this but close enough for this to be obvious over there. Still, glad SOMEONE is bringing it to the States since our current wireless providers enjoy keeping us like mushrooms and charging us as much as they possibly can.

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    14. Re:Obvious patents by Mistlefoot · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is normal were I live, eat, dine and drink. http://www.squirrelsystems.com/ have been doing this for at least the 12 years I have lived in BC. Just about EVERY mainstream bar or restaurant uses this or similar systems.

      Basically, waiters and waitresses use mobile stations to order your food. The wait staff then head to the bar to pick up and deliver your order. To add wireless to this does nothing. I suppose I could take any 10 year old technology patent, add wireless to it and call it a new creation. Whether the wait staff commit the order or the patron him/herself should have no bearing on anything.

      I am sure there must be more to the patent then the parent implies but if not I'm guessing this patent won't last long....

    15. Re:Obvious patents by tacocat · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm glad you got there before me. I was thinking that this jerkwad with the slick iPhone was going to get his latte via suppository rather than a regular cup. This might sound appealing but there's going to be hell to pay in the lines.

      But then you had to go and mention customer service as if anyone gives a damn about that anymore.

      We need a patent to punch the guy in the mouth when he strolls up with his iPhone asking for his double latte foo-foo coffee drink for $15.75 before we can get our morning grog.

    16. Re:Obvious patents by Original+Replica · · Score: 1

      this is an obvious patent.

      Most vague idea patents are obvious. Imagine of such a lack of specificity could be applied to copyright. I would copyright "the adventures of a young boy as he grows into a man." and "The story of young lovers and the events surrounding their courtship." That covers about 25% of all fictional literature.

      Maybe I should patent "a process to fix the US Patent system through more stringent and precise documentation of the invention"

      --
      We are all just people.
    17. Re:Obvious patents by vidarh · · Score: 1

      Wagamamas - a (UK only?) chain that serve Japanese style noodle dishes - does this using wireless PDA's, and have done for years. The only difference is that it's the servers and not the customers that operate the PDA's. The order gets split up and dispatched to terminals at each station in the kitchen.

    18. Re:Obvious patents by Sparks23 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not quite the same thing. The example given by another poster of Japanese cellular phones (which can function as something akin to credit cards, train passes, and generally do the sorts of things our wireless providers are not yet dreaming of) is more accurate.

      What I find sad is less specifically that Apple's patenting this and more that we've come to a situation where companies HAVE to try and patent anything they do in litigational self-defense, lest they end up like RIM with the endless stream of "Your Blackberry infringes on our never-used patent, you pay us money now!" lawsuits they suffer. Half of the meaningless patents we see these days are for protecting some process, specifically so that someone ELSE doesn't patent it and try to sue you. (And probably the other half are specifically being patented in hopes that eventually someone will have actionable infringement and can be sued.)

      This totally misses the point of what the patent system was intended for, and absolutely nobody wins. But the fact that the patent system is fundamentally broken at this point is not exactly news...

      --
      --Rachel
    19. Re:Obvious patents by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      take the idea of buying your movie tickets at a kiosk in the movie theatre. or buying them online before you leave your home. pretty obvious extension to buying something using a wifi device. if it is not obvious to you, it is because you don't want it to be obvious, or you wear a hockey helmet in daily life.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    20. Re:Obvious patents by jack455 · · Score: 1

      The best defense is a good offense. Must be why they tried to sue Creative for using their mp3 player interface 3 years before they invented the iPod. Oh wait, no. They were counter sued for millions of dollars.

      They also sued over the trash bin, Windows start menu and I believe the taskbar. They go crazy over lawsuits but I guess they aren't any worse with patents than most other companies. But they use their patents at least as much as most companies.

    21. Re:Obvious patents by DeadDecoy · · Score: 1

      Imagine the possibilities. I could get first post without actually being the first poster! First Post! Now gimme cuts.

    22. Re:Obvious patents by Starayo · · Score: 1

      We've got one here in Sydney.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    23. Re:Obvious patents by FoxconnGuy · · Score: 1

      Current patent qualification process has the pitfall that the administration officers can't be the experts for every *patent*. They may have no service such as this in their local Papa John. If a prior art does exist but wasn't found during qualification process, the dispute is resolved through law procedure. I think what we can do is to find some http://www.peertopatent.org/ like sites to provide more prior arts.

      It's not hard to find patents that re-represent human interaction as a piece of software and they to be resolved through law suits if a dispute has occurred. And I can't agree more that real-world interactions should be listed as a reject principle when qualifying a software patent.

      Software is very different from real-world. In the real world, you can give the movie DVD to your friend and have no problem. But in software world, if you want to share the mp3 you bought to your friend and delete your copy, shall this be legal or illegal? It is just different and the law makers should actually used the technologies before digital world bills are voted.

    24. Re:Obvious patents by shmlco · · Score: 1

      Defensive? Maybe. But as I pointed out on iSights when discussing the same patent, does anyone really think that Starbucks is busy rolling out an advanced wireless communication system nationwide... just so they can sell a few extra tunes?

      An iTunes track sells for a buck, of which the label gets 70-cents. So Apple and Starbucks get to split the rest, with Apple probably taking the lions share as they still have deliver the content. This leaves roughly 5-to-10 cents for a given Starbucks store to drop into their tip jar.

      Sell fifty or so tracks a week, and they could afford--maybe--to buy a cup of their own coffee.

      With this technology, however, Starbucks can cut the time we spend waiting in line, improve service, lock in a few more customers, and perhaps even reduce staffing levels to boot.

      And Apple gets to skim some milk off the top.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    25. Re:Obvious patents by sectionboy · · Score: 1

      Defensive, offensive, when you send out lawyer's mail, what's the difference?

    26. Re:Obvious patents by bennomatic · · Score: 1
      Good point. Additionally, the truth is, if you've bought anything from an Apple Store recently, you've experienced what they're doing. The person answering your questions can make the sale right where you're standing. Everything's obvious in retrospect, but I'll tell you, it's a whole new thing not to have to wait in a register line.

      I bought a laptop a few weeks ago at the Apple Store, then went next door to Victoria's Secret to by the wife some flannel jammies, and the feel was totally different. 5 times as many people in the apple store, same ratio of assistants to customers, but at VS, 3/4 of the time there was in a line where most of the customers in the store were standing. Get those customers buying and out of there, and it's a better experience for everyone; I think that this is indeed a unique and interesting solution to the retail problem. And the same solution (3 registers at the back of the store) has been the solution since the dawn of time. Why shouldn't Apple be able to patent something that is so different from basically all other retail stores?

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    27. Re:Obvious patents by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Not particularly a new thing...

      I can goto the grocery store here, grab a wireless scanner and scan junk as I throw it into my cart.

      Once I'm done, I just put the scanner up on the cradle and leave.

      Needless to say, if there was any crime rate here that wouldn't work so hot.

      Personally, I don't use it because a) it's just an incident waiting to happen and b) I like my groceries bagged.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    28. Re:Obvious patents by HeroreV · · Score: 1

      I remember hearing several times that RFID tags were going to allow me to push a loaded buggy right out the store without having to stop at a checkout counter. That and other ridiculously exaggerated ideas are common, even if they haven't caught on yet.

      It's possible they've really come up with something novel, but just going by the information in the article, Apple doesn't seem to have come up with anything new here. They're acting like patent trolls.

    29. Re:Obvious patents by Virtual_Raider · · Score: 1

      You are correct. It amazes me that being a place where so much advanced technology comes to life, the US seems to have a really crappy telecom and cable market. I was at Seoul recently and I saw many nifty things that could be done with your mobile, such as entering your number on a locker in a train station and getting an SMS with the combination key to unlock one compartment. When you pick up your stuff you just punch the combination again and the locker opens. The fee is charged to your mobile, no need for any sort of card, no exchange of money required. You can also use it to pay for your bus fee and that was way cool and quite similar to this use they seem to be trying to patent.

      --
      +Raider of the lost BBS
    30. Re:Obvious patents by Virtual_Raider · · Score: 1

      You are correct about the customer service but elsewhere I read that Starbucks have their own music label and its through it that they publish the music that you see at their cafes. So if that's true (can't be bothered to Google it, [not counting the fact that this assumes Google to be the paramount of authoritative sources ] ), then it means that Starbucks does in fact make the Star Bucks on this sales. Hey, it's even better than selling the actual plastic as they save the manufacturing costs and get to amortize the networking costs among free wireless access and whatever else they use the net for, so they probably make more money off selling you the aetherbits than the off the CD.

      --
      +Raider of the lost BBS
    31. Re:Obvious patents by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I can order stuff wirelessly too... watch!!

      "Hey, waitress! I need a latte!!"

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    32. Re:Obvious patents by zopf · · Score: 1

      I am obtaining a patent for the iFoot, a novel device that will trip unsuspecting iPhools as they move to the head of the line.

      --
      Did you see the pool? They flipped the bitch!
    33. Re:Obvious patents by anthonys_junk · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the sig. I have four cats here right now, I'm going to try some sort of switching communications protocol with them...

      --
      Barbara Felden claims prior art on the flip phone, sues Motorola, Nokia.
    34. Re:Obvious patents by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      This is nothing new I know a few places that use services like this.

      why not patent the wheel while their at it.

      ~Dan

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    35. Re:Obvious patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "if you've bought anything from an Apple Store recently, you've experienced what they're doing. The person answering your questions can make the sale right where you're standing"

      And they can e-mail the receipt to you, too, so you don't have to wait for it to be printed.

      Apple's next move should be to create their own Paypal-equivalent tied to your Apple ID (since my Apple ID has a credit card tied to it for iTunes) and give you their card to scan instead of your credit card.

      Then all the cool vendors will have "iPay" stickers in their front windows.

  2. Unbelievable by stoolpigeon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I haven't read the whole patent, and I don't intend to do so. I'm sure there is some very specific crap in there to somehow make this 'different' and 'patentable'. But the truth of the matter is that patenting the process is asinine. I buy pizza this way all the time and have been doing so for a while. I order it and pay online. I walk in, give my name and get my order. I don't wait in line.
     
    I may have to stop reading any story dealing with patents because the whole thing has just gone completely beyond insane. The only upside I can see is that I could start going to starbucks with a pda in hand, wait to see some tasty drink put out for pickup and snag it before the rightful owner. Free drinks.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:Unbelievable by gnuman99 · · Score: 1

      Maybe the part about notification when it's ready is important here. Otherwise, everything else has already been done.

    2. Re:Unbelievable by ajs · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Repeat after me: any patent which is summarized by a reporter relates in no way to the actual patent. Unless you've read the entire patent or at least ALL of the claims, you have no idea what the patent is about. Typically I can find at least 3 ways to summarize even really good and innovative patents that would make people pick up their pitchforks and torches. It's just too easy to do, and it turns out that it gets Slashdot some extra readership. :-/

    3. Re:Unbelievable by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      I get an email back about my pizza. That's close enough for me. I wonder what this will look like for the starbucks employees. I was joking about stealing drinks myself but I can't see how this wont make such activity trivial for the less morally inhibited among us.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    4. Re:Unbelievable by everphilski · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      track your pizza from Papa John's to your doorstep.

    5. Re:Unbelievable by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      I may have to stop reading any story dealing with patents because the whole thing has just gone completely beyond insane.
      What part of "somebody is making a lot of money off this, albeit neither of us" did you specifically think was "beyond insane"?
      I suppose the dissonance between what the patent system was intended to do, and what it has become is rather breathtaking, but "beyond insane"?
      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    6. Re:Unbelievable by UncleTogie · · Score: 2, Informative

      Maybe the part about notification when it's ready is important here. Otherwise, everything else has already been done.

      The notifications... have been done before, too...

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    7. Re:Unbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WAKE UP SHEEPLE!!

      Nuclear Pakistan is descending into anarchy and all you people care about is cutting in line at Starbucks?

      The dogs of war are upon us.

    8. Re:Unbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I do one better. I order my pizza online, and get alerted by a ding-dong sound in my house when the pizza is ready. Then I just walk up to the door and take my pizza. I even connect to the internet wirelessly to do make the order. I don't use an iPhone and the pizza place isn't a Starbucks though, so I can see how its totally different.

    9. Re:Unbelievable by arivanov · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have seen the ordering system in a Spanish restaurant in the middle of nowhere (Los Gigantes - a small resort on the west coast of Tenerife) do that in 2005. So there is plenty of prior art.

      IIRC, all orders were taken on small wireless palmtops (probably some variety of ruggedized palm with custom software). The order was transmitted to the kitchen straight away and the waiter could service the next table and so on instead of running like mad between the table rows and the kitchen (as customary). When an order was ready for collection the palmtop rang. As a result 3 waiters managed to deal with a restaurant which had at least 45 tables, probably more.

      Dunno who did the software for them, but a few years back it would have been an impressive feat of engineering. With all the limitations of PalmOS and such doing this would have required a lot of effort.

      Doing the same as a web based app for something like the iPhone is a piece of cake. Depending on the complexity of the interface into the ordering system it can take from a couple of hours to at most a couple of weeks.

      What is more interesting is where does this put T-Mobile partnership with Starbucks. It could have done that using any of their handhelds like the sidekick ages ago and it has suitable GSM/GPRS interface as well. Bet they are slapping themselves on the forehead at the moment.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    10. Re:Unbelievable by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The fact that you "can find at least 3 ways to summarize even really good and innovative patents" should tell you that the patent in question is neither good nor innovative.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    11. Re:Unbelievable by Four_One_Nine · · Score: 2, Funny

      Point taken. I will no longer cut in line at any Starbucks located in Pakistan.

      --
      I did it for Johnny.
    12. Re:Unbelievable by Kris_J · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      What's more, even from the description I'm sure some of what's being described is non-trivial. If they can get this sort of thing working properly, they deserve a patent.

    13. Re:Unbelievable by edwardpickman · · Score: 1
      First off snagging a cup of coffee because it's sitting on a counter is thieft. There may be a debate about IP and downloading but I don't think there's a debate about taking physical items. Just because Brittany does it, steals a lighter in front of the paparazzi, doesn't make it alright.

      I'm curious about the patent. I'm assuming it relates specifically proprietary software and hardware that they developed as in a long range goal with the iPhones. They seem to want to expand it over time into a personal assisstent rather than just a PDA with a phone. It's not the patent so much as the deals that they are making may be questionable. The deals may leave competition out in the cold. The problem we are facing may be are the old views on monopolies may no longer be sustainable. Competition was always a good thing when the playing field was level and the laws governing monopolies were to keep that playing field level. That model has been shattered by free trade. People in the US can't live as cheaply as people in other countries so there is simply no way for them to compete. A level playing field means everyone has to live in a third world economy because there are limited resources. Remember we've been exceeding available resources since the early 80s. How this applies to this issue is what's the true market and can it sustain more than one competitor or do they simply get into a throat cutting contest? Look at satelite radio. There's only two companies competing yet neither can turn a profit. Their only hope of survival is probably a merger but the law doesn't allow for it. The service itself may have to go away because of existing laws. On the other hand I find things like media mergers a very scary thing and we may be seeing the death of the press as we've known it. Already we have blond bimbos and male models reading the news on most stations where as back in the day they were actual reporters. Yeah they didn't look so good and they often drank too much but they knew their subject and did most of their own reporting. Watching the White House Press Secretary stare blankly when she was asked about the Cuban Missile Crisis drove that home. Being a perky blond doesn't mean you're qualified to work in news other than running for coffee. I'd rather have an over weight chain smoker that did serious reporting.

      With this type of sales system it may cause chaos having multiple companies competing for the market. Imagine with the Blu-Ray HD battle only with a hundred standards fighting to survive? There may need to be a single standard but there's no organization in place to create the standard. Even if there was history tells us it would take years and potentially decades to establish one. If one company is going to put the time and money into establishing the system then their stockholders are going to expect to benefit from that investment. So long as it doesn't end up costing more for the customer, due to a lack of competition then I don't really see the harm. The real purpose behind anti monopoly laws was to keep one company from dictating what you'd pay for goods or services. Ultimately the government may have to accept some monopolies and provide oversight inorder to keep progress moving forward. The obvious argument is we can't trust government or they aren't competent. Well guess what, next time you vote for these idiots look in a mirror. I get tired of the argument that the government is too incompetent to be trusted to run anything bigger than a lemonaide stand. We should have the best minds running the government, we pay them enough. We can't trust or depend on government so long as people keep electing Cletus the Slack Jawed Yokel to run the country. Just because they slap a suit on them and stand them up there doesn't mean you have to vote for them. The old saying "you can't give a monkey a gun and blame him when he shoots some one" applies here. You want people to pass meaningful patent reform then elect them. You can't elect some one that can't spell the word and expect change.

    14. Re:Unbelievable by Zordak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm sure there is some very specific crap in there to somehow make this 'different' and 'patentable'. If so, then that "very specific crap" will limit the claims to make them allowable. A patent does not give you the right to prohibit anybody from doing anything that looks like the abstract. It's limited by the claims, which have to be patentable over prior art. Until you've read and carefully examined the claims, you have not idea what the "patent" is.
      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    15. Re:Unbelievable by Zordak · · Score: 1

      The fact that it was done at a Spanish restaurant does not make it prior art for U.S. purposes. If it was known in the U.S. before Apple "invented" it, that counts. The Spanish prior art will only be available if somebody described it in a printed publication (that can be anywhere in the world).

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    16. Re:Unbelievable by tieTYT · · Score: 1

      I buy pizza this way all the time and have been doing so for a while. I order it and pay online. I walk in, give my name and get my order. I don't wait in line.
      I have this idea where you order the pizza online and they bring it right to your door. Patent pending!
    17. Re:Unbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Morally inhibited? Que? Is there any moral argument whatsoever for not stealing from Starbucks?

      Best I can come up with is, "Employees might get in trouble, rather than owners losing money." Otherwise, it's just the danger of getting caught.

    18. Re:Unbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Repeat after me: any patent which is summarized by a reporter relates in no way to the actual patent. Unless you've read the entire patent or at least ALL of the claims, you have no idea what the patent is about. Typically I can find at least 3 ways to summarize even really good and innovative patents that would make people pick up their pitchforks and torches. It's just too easy to do, and it turns out that it gets Slashdot some extra readership. :-/


      any patent which is summarized by a reporter relates in no way to the actual patent. Unless you've read the entire patent or at least ALL of the claims, you have no idea what the patent is about. Typically I can find at least 3 ways to summarize even really good and innovative patents that would make people pick up their pitchforks and torches. It's just too easy to do, and it turns out that it gets Slashdot some extra readership. :-/
    19. Re:Unbelievable by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Yes, lots of restaurants use pagers. Chili's and Outback come to mind, but I know that I have seen many more use it.

    20. Re:Unbelievable by JohnBailey · · Score: 1

      Maybe the part about notification when it's ready is important here. Otherwise, everything else has already been done. Would that not be similar to taking a number and waiting for it to appear on a display over the counter. Or waiting in a takeaway after phoning your order until your name is called. " by means of a wireless communication system" is not really enough to differentiate the process. Or should not be.
      --
      It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
    21. Re:Unbelievable by mackyrae · · Score: 1

      "Very specific crap"
      Oh, I know. When you order pizza, you expect it to be properly cooked, whereas when you order Starbucks, you expect burnt coffee (you know, the only kind they serve).

      --
      look! it's a bird, it's a plane, it's....a girl? yes, a girl browsing Slashdot on Linux
    22. Re:Unbelievable by anthonys_junk · · Score: 1

      you funny bastard. Log in next time and you might get some mod points.

      --
      Barbara Felden claims prior art on the flip phone, sues Motorola, Nokia.
    23. Re:Unbelievable by arivanov · · Score: 1

      I suspect that what I saw was off-the-shelf commercial software, not one off. I just do not believe someone doing a one off for a small restaurant in a small resort in a middle of nowhere in western Europe.

      So all that takes to use this for prior art purposes is to find who is the software vendor and see when and where it advertised its system. I bet it was advertised on the Internet which will make it useable for prior art proof in a US case.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    24. Re:Unbelievable by ajs · · Score: 1

      The fact that you "can find at least 3 ways to summarize even really good and innovative patents" should tell you that the patent in question is neither good nor innovative. I think you missed the point. You can't summarize patents. Period. You have to read all of their claims carefully. I could summarize a patent, but I can only do so lossily inn a way that won't help anyone legally. It's a process ONLY useful for making headlines on Slashdot.

  3. Obvious? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I mean honestly, how different is this to dialing ahead with your order from a cell phone? That uses wireless technology to skip queues & waiting too.

    Well done Apple - patent innovation the Microsoft/Amazon way!

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:Obvious? by xRelisH · · Score: 4, Insightful

      mean honestly, how different is this to dialing ahead with your order from a cell phone?

      Umm, I have a few:
      1. I'd rather order through a readable UI with touch screen than having to repeat myself several times over the phone due to poor signal or noise where I am. I always order pizza from my computer, ordering through similar means on something mobile would be more convenient.
      2. The store would need to hire someone on the phone to take the order. Having a person actually there helps when ordering in person for ambiance, but when you're ordering over the phone, it's annoying... and don't get me started with those voice activated systems. I'd rather be able to select what I want through a digital menu.
      3. If this system is tied into a billing system like how .Mac is, then this saves me another hassle of having to say my credit card information over the phone or have to whip it out and slide at the counter.

    2. Re:Obvious? by Facetious · · Score: 1

      Here, here! As much as Apple implies it is not like Microsoft, they certainly seem to borrow plenty from the latter's play book. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

      --
      Let us not become the evil that we deplore.
    3. Re:Obvious? by provigilman · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Exactly, this is quite different from the old "Pick up the phone and call in for a pizza." You're talking a completely encapsulated ordering interface, WiFi connection, order queue interrupt (to bump yours into the queue for those barristas to make) and a billing system. It's like saying that a cell phone is obvious tech because you had a landline for years.

      The major question that this article doesn't answer though, is will there be a virtual tip jar???

      --
      "Life's short and hard, like a body building elf." -- The Bloodhound Gang
    4. Re:Obvious? by provigilman · · Score: 1
      Oh, and in case some smartass tries to say "Well cell phones and land lines are completely different things", then let me use a better example. It's like saying that cell phones are obvious tech and not worth a patent because of wireless "walkie talkies".

      Thing is, while they bear some similarities to each other because they both transmit wirelessly and they make use of signal variance to reach different users, they're completely different. Just like ordering from your PC/Phone and driving over there is very different than hitting a button on your iPhone that automatically orders your drink and adds it to your tab.

      --
      "Life's short and hard, like a body building elf." -- The Bloodhound Gang
    5. Re:Obvious? by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I mean honestly, how different is this to dialing ahead with your order from a cell phone? That uses wireless technology to skip queues & waiting too.


      Its not much different in outline, its different only in the mechanics of implementation. Of course, patents don't cover outlines, they cover mechanics of implementation, so noticing that this is similar but in the mechanics of implementation is not really a good argument against patentability. The broad outline is fairly obvious, but without reading the actual patent (rather than a popular media report that provides no useful information) I don't have much opinion on whether the specific claims and method patented is obvious.

      I would guess that its either so obvious that it should be unpatentable or, if its non-obvious, there are so many ways to implement the same user experience as to make the patent mostly useless except for defensive purposes. But which one of those, I can't guess.
    6. Re:Obvious? by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      How about going with 'Ordering a pizza online.' They don't have to hire someone for the phone, it's built into the billing system, inserted into the queue automatically.

      Apple took the standard "...over the internet" patent addendum and tossed in "wirelessly."

    7. Re:Obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here, here! Unless you're trying to lure an alien queen away from its prey, the proper term is, "Hear, hear!" as in "Listen to that person."
    8. Re:Obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cell phones are obvious tech and not worth a patent because of wireless "walkie talkies".

      Thats because cellphones do a completely different thing from walkie talkies (IE, point to point network usable by more than one person at a time, etc). Now, here's my question: does someone have a patent over the "push to talk" "walkie talkie" feature found on some phones, and is that "novel" and deserving of a patent because it's a walkie talkie... ON THE INT^H^H^HCELL PHONE!

    9. Re:Obvious? by eclectic4 · · Score: 1

      "how different is this to dialing ahead with your order from a cell phone?"

      Because now you can buy your favorite "whatzit" and have the it tell you when it's ready to pick up, already paid for with just one click. It's the same, yes, but the mechanics of making it easier can be patented. "I know of a way to keep you from having to dial a phone number, talk to a guy that hopefully gets the order right, have to either use cash or give your number to this guy, etc..."

      As stated previously, summaries about patents like this can be flame targets for the very reason you posted in the first place.

      --

      "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
    10. Re:Obvious? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      All three of your points have been addressed by papajohns.com for the past few years now. Apple is attempting to patent something that's been done before, even Buffalo Wild Wings has been doing this. It's too blatantly obvious, and also, this has been done with touchscreen menus in restaurants.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    11. Re:Obvious? by InvalidError · · Score: 1

      The fusion of technologies (phone + walkie-talkie ~= cordless phone) is obvious and not patentable. What is non-obvious and patentable is the various brands of glue (CDMA/GSM/etc. RF MACs and phone chipsets) that make this fusion possible.

    12. Re:Obvious? by godawsgo · · Score: 1


      OMG! I loved the old 'fake address 30 minutes or less order scam!'

      "141? I'm at 411!! What the hell! Did your operator make some kind of typo?!? You're late!!!"

      Obviously they are planning to bill your mobile account even if you don't/can't show up for the $8 coffee!? So, can I steal the phone of my arch-nemesis and order grande lattes for the shop?

      Ok, in all seriousness, the delivery/made to order industry has had all sorts of nefarious (read: highschool kids) scams thrust upon them, and they have dealt with them, to varying degrees, by insisting on a physical location - ie: an online pizza delivery.

      So now, I can order something, that has some cost to make, without any guarantee that I will be there to pick it up.

      IMHO, the sensible decision is to just make the coffee after the person shows.. Which quite defeats the purpose...

      --
      Go, Daws. Go!

    13. Re:Obvious? by jack455 · · Score: 1

      I can already order pizza over the internet. Apple makes a big deal of providing iphone users "all" of the internet.

      "Mod patent redundant"

    14. Re:Obvious? by fearx · · Score: 1

      I think most of you are missing the benefit of this as reported and this is not to say that I believe Apple should patent this process.. Let us assume that the reporter is somewhat accurate in describing the patent. What most people here are describing would infer that you were out specifically to get a cup of coffee or pizza, but this could target those impulse shoppers. For example, say I am in a mall and all of a sudden have a craving for a beverage. I know Starbucks is about 10 stores away, so I place my order through my handheld phone, pda whatever. I continue to shop, then my device alerts me that my beverage is ready. I don't need to go to the store and hope my order has been completed, my device lets me know. Its more of a cross between calling ahead and the devices they hand out at restaurants when a table is available for you. Except those are limited to a short distance. The most important part of the application is quoted in the article, "One goal, the patent application notes, is to avoid an"annoying wait in a long queue if the purchaser arrives before completion of the order."" At least that is my interpretation.

    15. Re:Obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I always order pizza from my computer"

      Your computer can cook?

  4. iTunes==Apple Checkout? by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You can already buy video from the iTunes store so why not an over priced cup of coffee?
    Now if Apple can just get a GPS into the next iPhone it will be complete.
    You tap the starbucks icon and it finds the nearest Starbucks. You then get a menu select what you want and then you are good to go.
    You then get a text message when it is done.
    Could work for just about any restaurant. My cell phone already searches for gas by price and then can give me turn by turn directions to the station.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    1. Re:iTunes==Apple Checkout? by ChronosWS · · Score: 1

      Searching for gas by price... how much disparity is there where you live? Around here, it's usually not more than a few cents a gallon within any reasonable driving distance (that is, the distance beyond which any savings you would realize are consumed by the extra gas spent.) And unless you are filling up by the hundreds of gallons, you won't save any measurable amount of cash by 'shopping around' for gas. So I am curious...

    2. Re:iTunes==Apple Checkout? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Actually as much as 15 cents and sometimes within just a few blocks of one another. Yesterday I saw one place that had gas at 2.97 a gallon just a few blocks from a station that had gas at 3.17 a gallon.
      It is more handy when you are traveling. The gas station right on the exits tends to be pretty pricey and not every exit has a station.
      And of course it gives me the price and the distance to the station.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:iTunes==Apple Checkout? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      You can already buy video from the iTunes store so why not an over priced cup of coffee?
      Since you are doing all the work of placing the order and paying for it online, how much of a discount do you get?
      I still don't understand why people pay $6 for a cup of coffee. Coffee is supposed to be $0.50 and unlimited refills.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    4. Re:iTunes==Apple Checkout? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, 15 cents you say?

      So if you fill up with (let's say) 15 gallons, you saved a whole $2.15! And thats not taking into account any extra driving required to get to the cheaper station.

      If 2 bucks is worth enough to you to go through that much trouble, may I suggest you stop driving and finish paying off that trailer you put on layaway?

    5. Re:iTunes==Apple Checkout? by mad_ian · · Score: 1

      Except Starbucks is horrible coffee not worth purchasing...

      --
      ~Donald / Just RTFM
    6. Re:iTunes==Apple Checkout? by value_added · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I still don't understand why people pay $6 for a cup of coffee. Coffee is supposed to be $0.50 and unlimited refills.

      Ahh, the great old days when coffee was indeed pennies per cup and unlimited refills were cheerfully served by a blue-haired waitress with a name like Marge or Betty sewn on her uniform. What I wouldn't pay to go back to those days, when the coffee I was served was made from stale low-grade beans and boiled to within an inch of its life in large percolators where it typically sat for hours before the watery, tasteless but occasionally aromatic brew was poured into my waiting cup.

      Come to think of it, I do. About 50 cents, and not a penny more.

      I've not done the arithmetic, but I would guess that's the cost of a typical cup of coffee in my house. Not factoring in the cost of an espresso machine and a burr grinder (with maintenance contracts on both), and the time required to grind, heat (the machine, utensils, milk, cups, and just about everything else), then brew, prepare, serve, and clean up afterwards, it's a real steal! Even better, I don't have to tip anyone. Mind you, if I wanted to have a chocolate desert blended into my coffee instead of eaten on a plate with a fork like I normally do, it might very well be close to $6 per cup.

      The moral to this story, if there is one, is that you get what you pay for. The way I see it is that it took America about 50 years to discover and then catch onto the idea of quality, fresh, personally-prepared coffee that folks in other countries took for granted, so it might take another few years for everyone here to get used the idea that it should cost more. For everyone else, there's those vending machines at your local Quickie Mart, and a restaurant here or there with waitresses named Marge or Betty ready to pour you that 50 cent cup.

    7. Re:iTunes==Apple Checkout? by m50d · · Score: 1
      Could work for just about any restaurant.

      There's no real need for it to though; only starbucks is trendy enough for iphone users.

      --
      I am trolling
    8. Re:iTunes==Apple Checkout? by woobieman29 · · Score: 1

      Absolutely agree, but I do think that Starbucks has served a purpose. I'll state up front that to my tastes it seems that Starbucks over-roasts their coffee, and it ends up being really nasty bitter. This is hidden by most Starbucks customers who seems to generally order Mochas and other super-sweet things, but if you ever drink their coffee or espresso straight up you'll see what I mean.

      That being said, Starbucks has at least introduced the idea of better coffee to America at large. Think back to the pre-Starbucks days, and the sort of coffee that was generally available. Dunkin Donuts anyone? Winchells? Or god forbid, 7/11? Nowadays even though I pass up the Starbucks on every corner I only have to go a few minutes from my house to hit one of the decent locally-owned joints that have sprung up, or a few minutes more to get to Peet's (One of my favorites, local to Northern Cal originally). None of this was there before Starbucks.

      So yeah, they make bad coffee IMO. Still an important company though...

      --
      \/\/oobie
    9. Re:iTunes==Apple Checkout? by duguk · · Score: 1

      1. Most tanks are BIGGER than 15 gallons.
      2. Say you fill up once a week with 15 gallons (I use twice that)
      3. Thats $111.80 a year (or $223 a year for someone like me). Personally, thats quite a bit of money.
      4. If you've got a trailer, you'll be less efficient and you'll want cheaper fuel :P
      5. The cheaper station might be on the way to your destination... hard to know if you don't check is it?

      In the UK prices can vary by about 30 pence per litre (60 cents) - so multiply all the figures above by four :)

      If you're happy to just go to your cheapest petrol station, good luck to you. Personally I like to save money when its easy to do so.

      Why do I always have to comment on petrol related comments....?

      DugUK

    10. Re:iTunes==Apple Checkout? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Let's see. It takes me all of 20 seconds to check my phone for the cheapest gas available on my way home from work. I don't drive any extra for distance and I save $2.15 for 20 seconds of work.
      So exactly why should I pay that extra $2.15 instead of just checking my phone?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    11. Re:iTunes==Apple Checkout? by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Do you roast your beans on-site too? Unless you do, you're just engaging in a rather ignorant self-esteem boosting exercise with all that gear. It doesn't matter how soon after grinding the beans you brew a pot of coffee. If the beans were roasted more than about a day before the coffee was brewed you're drinking coffee significantly inferior to what it should be. The 'secret' to good coffee at high-end coffeehouses is the beans are roasted, daily, on-site.

      I bet you got all inspired by watching James Bond in "Live And Let Die", or did you order your coffee gear from the Sharper Image site?

  5. UGh, this is not a new "idea" by Buzz_Litebeer · · Score: 1

    This idea has been explored in Science fiction a lot, I remember one outer limits where the people considered others of their social group "retarded" for not being able to order ahead electronically.

    Also, don't the Japanese already do this with their cell phone technology? Does Japanese prior art count?

    --
    If you don't vote, you don't matter, so don't waste your time telling me your opinion
    1. Re:UGh, this is not a new "idea" by minvaren · · Score: 1

      "Stream of Consciousness" is the Outer Limits episode you refer to.

      --
      Big! Strong! Wow! Tada-O!
    2. Re:UGh, this is not a new "idea" by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Does Japanese prior art count?

      Yes. And if you are too poor to afford your own translator, than a shitty mistranslation of Japanese prior art counts...

      IANAL, nor am I bitter.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    3. Re:UGh, this is not a new "idea" by kanweg · · Score: 1

      If this properly describes what Apple's patent application wants to claim, then this book is valid prior art. You may recall a Mythbuster's episode where they raised a sunken ship with pingpong balls. This was in an earlier Donald Duck comic, and the patent got only saved by the specific way of getting the balls down, but the general principle could no longer be claimed.

      I'm a patent agent, and this software patent stuff irritates me to no end. So, there is nothing to stop you from sending a copy of the relevant pages of that book, together with details such as when it was published, title etc. to the USPTO together. Don't forget to mention the patent application number and state that it shouldn't be granted in view of the enclosed prior art. I'm a certified Apple fanboi, but any patent that doesn't qualify as Inventive shouldn't be granted, which should make software patents fair game.

      Bert

  6. Fandango... by HockeyPuck · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hmmm I go to their website, buy a ticket. Then when I get to the movie theater I go to the "Fandango Only" line, bypassing the other people, get my tickets and go in.

    1. Re:Fandango... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      when I get to the movie theater I go to the "Fandango Only" line Wow! Fandango must be a really popular movie to still be in theatrical release.
      Kinda sucks that you have to keep seeing the same movie over and over again though.
      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  7. Yuck by jimmy_dean · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I love Apple and their products (I have 2 Macs and an iPod), but this is ridiculous. I can't believe the patent system allows this. Who are these people in charge of granting patents who get suckered into thinking this is a unique, tangible product? Patents are for recuperating costs (among other uses), where are Apple's costs in developing this idea?

    --
    -> Sometimes, you just gotta break free from the shackles of proprietary code.
    1. Re:Yuck by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Their think-tank ordered a pizza one slow night, and went "HEY! We can patent THAT!"

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    2. Re:Yuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hold your disgust - the patent system isn't "allowing" anything, as the patent hasn't even been examined yet. You can check the status of the application and the back and forth between the USPTO and the lawyers handling this hereby typing in the number given in the article under "Publication Number": http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/pair

    3. Re:Yuck by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Patents are for recuperating costs (among other uses), where are Apple's costs in developing this idea?

      Patents allow you to recoup costs. Patents do not require that have costs.

      Causation is one reason for correlation. Correlation is not one reason for causation.

      Or, more generally,( A --> B ) -/-> ( B --> A ). Yay symbolic logic.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    4. Re:Yuck by DustyShadow · · Score: 1

      Who are these people in charge of granting patents who get suckered into thinking this is a unique, tangible product? This patent has not been granted yet. It's only an application at this point.
    5. Re:Yuck by TBerben · · Score: 1

      You insensitive clod! Think of all the coffee required to have Apple's think tank produce such a patent!

  8. Prior art? by sokoban · · Score: 2, Funny

    There is a local 24 hour diner that I sometimes eat at late at night. Generally from 2:00 AM onwards, there is a huge drunk crowd. I place my order over the phone so that when I get there I don't have to wait in line to order. Sometimes, if there is a long line and I didn't expect one, I call from my table to place my order. When my order is ready, the wait staff yells out my name, wirelessly no less, to notify me that my order is ready.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    1. Re:Prior art? by zullnero · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's more prior art than that. A whole freaking lot more. I've personally interviewed and worked with several companies that have practically patented almost the exact same concept. Using a mobile device to buy stuff wirelessly is a concept that has been around for many years. There are patents all over the place in regards to this idea, and the biggest problem is actually implementing something without tripping one of them off. You need to do such and such for security scheme x, but that's already patented by so and so...etc.

      It's a bloody mess, so Mac fans...don't get your hopes up. I know a lot of you are suddenly all pumped about this smartphone revolution that has been around a lot longer than your iPhone...but this particular market is a minefield. Wonder why you haven't seen much out of Palm lately? Everywhere you turn, there's another freaking patent in your face and another guy or corporation who is sitting on it looking to make his quick fortune. That is why REAL innovation is slowing down so much in the mobile market. Either you innovate and risk the lawsuits, or you try and work around the patents, and you never get anything done.

      And if you don't like it, then get up and do something about the US patent system.

    2. Re:Prior art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I've heard of this place you're talking about. Where I come from they call this place Taco Bell. Drunks love it and at 2:00 AM it's always busy.

    3. Re:Prior art? by tcgroat · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget about wireless toll payments. Pay your turnpike tolls wirelessly, avoid waiting in line.

  9. That's all well and good but.. by dgun · · Score: 1

    As a minimalist, I make my own coffee. So, I would like my coffee maker to send a text message to my cell phone.

    YCIR, lolz!@11!

    --
    FAQs are evil.
    1. Re:That's all well and good but.. by Applekid · · Score: 3, Informative

      Then you'll need to read up on RFC 2324.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    2. Re:That's all well and good but.. by dgun · · Score: 1

      Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol (HTCPCP/1.0)

      2.1.4 WHEN method

      When coffee is poured, and milk is offered, it is necessary for the holder of the recipient of milk to say "when" at the time when sufficient milk has been introduced into the coffee. For this purpose, the "WHEN" method has been added to HTCPCP.

      Prior art, ey? That won't stop me and my team of IP lawyers.

      --
      FAQs are evil.
    3. Re:That's all well and good but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really hope some of these rfc's are bogus... their great for a laugh though :)

  10. dumb idea by ILuvRamen · · Score: 5, Funny

    There's one problem though. If customers did it that way then they wouldn't get to act like a douche at the counter about the staff getting their 10 word drink correct nor would they get to feel all special ordering a 10 word drink out loud. One of my college teachers used to work at a Starbucks and trust me he said, "People really are like that. Every one of them." They don't want convenience and speed, they wanna walk in and act like the most self important dick in the world and pretend they're rich by spending like $8 on a coffee. If you take that away, they'll stop coming!

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    1. Re:dumb idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least your teacher wasn't bitter about working two jobs.

    2. Re:dumb idea by Sciros · · Score: 4, Funny

      I call BS! I buy coffee, more specifically a White Chocolate Mocha With Soy Milk And Caramel On Top at Starbucks ALL THE TIME (because I'm rich) and half the time there's a customer there who is not at all what you describe. He's just there for some tea (me, I don't even say "tea" anymore I just say "Tazo" because that probably means 'tea' in Mexican or something anyway) or something and stares at the menu for like a whole minute like a clueless moron and then has trouble figuring out that a Grande is medium not large what a dolt.

      --
      I like basketball!!1!
    3. Re:dumb idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is exactly what this is about. They get to feel really important going the to "cool iphone owners only" line and picking up the drink that was pre-made for them. I doubt it will catch on. Sometimes the drink will be cold, sometimes it won't be ready, sometimes a customer in the regular line will stick out a foot and trip the idiot...

    4. Re:dumb idea by colganc · · Score: 1

      A person I knew worked at a Starbucks and said to me, "People really are like that. Every one of them." lulz.

    5. Re:dumb idea by Animats · · Score: 1

      nor would they get to feel all special ordering a 10 word drink out loud.

      Exactly. That's the entire point of Starbucks. It's an ego boost. It's not about coffee.

      That's why expresso machines are made to look complex and to require so much manual attention. The job could be done better by a microprocessor with a few sensors and actuators, and often it is; the manual stuff is mostly for drama.

      That business is about experience, not product. Faster order processing isn't the point.

    6. Re:dumb idea by mwasham · · Score: 1

      Well being a Mac FanBoy/iPhone user they are likely to announce that due to their superior technology they are able to cut in line in front of all the poor losers.. So don't worry about the arrogance factor going away ;)

    7. Re:dumb idea by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Man, I have the same problem at Quiznos. It's just easier for everyone involved when I order a "For Here, Regular Classic Italian, On Wheat, No Vegetables Except Lettuce", and then stare menacingly at the staff to make sure they get it right. (FACT: They always do. And if I didn't specify all of that at once they would ask me, "is that for here or to go?" "What size?" "Which sandwich?" "White bread or wheat?" "Olives and tomatoes?" I hear Starbucks does the same thing if you just try to order coffee.)

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    8. Re:dumb idea by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      The not funny post above yours got modded "5, Funny", yet nothing for your superior post! The injustice! Now that I think about it, though, most of the nerds on slashdot wouldn't get your cleverly stated counter-point.

    9. Re:dumb idea by coolGuyZak · · Score: 1

      That's me you insensitive clod!

      And, for your information, I stopped trying to decipher what "Grande" means weeks ago.

  11. Overly specialized and mostly useless by Torinaga-Sama · · Score: 1

    In the given example if I was in line at this Starbucks of the future and some trendy yob talking on a phone walks in the door gets his mocha and leaves while I am standing there waiting for someone to take my order I would probably fight off the urge to pop someone in the nose and just walk out the door to a smaller mom an pop type place where I can still get some personal service.

    Bear in mind that I am techie and that is how I would react, imagine what your dad would do.

    I can see this for ordering a pizza, but you know you can already do that with most of the major vendors. What exactly IS new about this?

    --
    (/local/home/curiosity)-#who -u|grep thecat|cut -c 44-49|xargs kill -9
    1. Re:Overly specialized and mostly useless by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 5, Funny

      My dad wouldn't do that, because he's dead. Anyway, being dead, he wouldn't be caught dead in a Starbucks.

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    2. Re:Overly specialized and mostly useless by Torinaga-Sama · · Score: 1

      Obviously, a man of taste and distinction.

      My condolences.

      --
      (/local/home/curiosity)-#who -u|grep thecat|cut -c 44-49|xargs kill -9
  12. Re:Fandango... ie CROOKS by Karja · · Score: 1

    yes, and then you can be signed up for an automatic $10/month charge for an "advantage" program you'd never know about unless you carefully cheacked your statements, and for which they won't return the money without legal threats/involvement.

  13. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all I have to do now is wait for the phone to tell me that the coffee is ready, as long it's all high tech stuff I'm happy to wait. God forbid I have to talk to or socialize with the people in line, Starbucks employees, or friends.

    1. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, you do realize that 99.9% of the human race sucks, right? The less interaction with fellow mouth-breathers, the better.

  14. Sort of Unique by WebmasterNeal · · Score: 1

    This isn't anything ground breaking. Many resturants that I go to with long lines will give customers a small device (similar to a pager) that notifies them when they are first in line (or a table is ready for them). This patent seems to take that idea one step further by allowing you to order and then notifying you when it is ready to pick up. It's similar to what somebody else pointed out: that they have been ordering pizzas online for a long time and stroll in to pick them up whenever they want.

    --
    "During My Service In The United States Congress, I Took The Initiative In Creating The Internet." -Al Gore
  15. It's just a freakin' reservation system by davidwr · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is obvious, let me count the ways.

    In the 1980s, I could walk up to an ATM machine, tap a few buttons, and order airline tickets. This put me ahead of the people standing in line at the ticket counter.

    Today, I can walk up to a kiosk and order movie tickets, which puts me ahead of those waiting in line.

    Decades ago, I could call a restaurant and reserve a table, putting me ahead of those who were in line to tell the waiter that they needed a table.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:It's just a freakin' reservation system by Leftist+Troll · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, no, this is completely different from any of those things. Now you'll be using Apple products and services, so it will all be inherently much better in a magical way that can't be described using pathetic human words.

    2. Re:It's just a freakin' reservation system by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      And there's a tag I can buy that allows me to "order" my "favorite" lane on the toll roads and pass by the losers using cash.

    3. Re:It's just a freakin' reservation system by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Yes, because with Apple, patents Just Work.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    4. Re:It's just a freakin' reservation system by gentlemen_loser · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In the 1980s, I could walk up to an ATM machine, tap a few buttons, and order airline tickets. This put me ahead of the people standing in line at the ticket counter.

      That's pretty cool. Here in the 2007s, we get to wait 2 hours, strip nekkid, walk through a metal detector, and have a bomb sniffing dog rammed up our asses whenever we go to the airports. Its a shame I never got to experience the mystical place you are describing.

    5. Re:It's just a freakin' reservation system by wgoodman · · Score: 1

      Have you ever tried taking beef jerky as a snack on your carry on? That makes the dogs really happy!

    6. Re:It's just a freakin' reservation system by tieTYT · · Score: 4, Funny

      I thought of an even better idea. You call in your order to starbucks and they BRING the coffee TO YOU. Kinda like a pizz...uh, I mean kinda like something nobody has ever done or thought of before.

    7. Re:It's just a freakin' reservation system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think telephones and ATMs aren't covered by patents?

      If it's obvious, then why hasn't anybody implemented it yet? If it's worthless and obvious, then why does anybody care if Apple has a patent on it? I don't see anybody raising hell over "Method of exercising a cat".

    8. Re:It's just a freakin' reservation system by MorpheousMarty · · Score: 2, Funny

      Allow me to explain this in the only medium capable of convening the magic, interpretative dance! (the goggles will do nothing).

    9. Re:It's just a freakin' reservation system by SacredByte · · Score: 1

      ATM machine
      Mod parent redundant....
    10. Re:It's just a freakin' reservation system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now Apple can go back and sue all the people who have been allowing people to preorder stuff to avoid lines for decades! With all the liscensing fees they will get they won't need to innovate another single thing.

      Next thing you know, they will be copyrighting apple trees and sueing farmers.

    11. Re:It's just a freakin' reservation system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hooray for Apple !

    12. Re:It's just a freakin' reservation system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did you get modded insightful?

    13. Re:It's just a freakin' reservation system by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      I once crossed the Russian border with a half eaten roast chicken sat in the middle of my railway compartment, I was really disappointed when they didn't bring any sniffer dogs on board 'cos I was looking forward to the entertainment.

    14. Re:It's just a freakin' reservation system by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      On my flight this Christmas I could check in over the web. Okay, no big deal, that's been around for a couple of years. But they e-mailed me my boarding pass. So my iPod Touch WAS my boarding pass. That was kind of a Star Trek moment.

    15. Re:It's just a freakin' reservation system by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Not only that, today you can pull out your iphone, open a browser, pay for movie tickets, then walk right up and skip the line. All done wirelessly, just like this patent. In-fact, I did it yesterday. How is this patentable again?

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    16. Re:It's just a freakin' reservation system by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      Do you actually fly often? I do, and while I've had one or two long waits, most of the time it takes like five minutes to get through the security line. Stop crying...unless perhaps you're doing something on purpose to attract attention?

    17. Re:It's just a freakin' reservation system by p0tat03 · · Score: 1

      Hmm... What about the liquid ban? I used to take a large bottle of water with me in my carry-on - the dry stuffy air in the cabin does horrid things to me, and I often have a headache by the time I disembark. Now I have to keep bothering the stewardesses for water, when I could very well have brought my own.

      What about the fact that it was supposed to be a TEMPORARY ban? But like all "temporary" and "emergency" measures, this one stuck around.

      Or the fact that as a tech industry guy, I tend to carry a lot of electronics around with me (external HDD, USB hubs, a slew of power adapters, etc.) that gets me CONSTANT attention at security?

      Flying has always been a pain, but in recent years it's gone from a dull ache to a full-on head-splitting headache. I loathe flying.

    18. Re:It's just a freakin' reservation system by idiotnot · · Score: 1

      Hmm... What about the liquid ban? I used to take a large bottle of water with me in my carry-on - the dry stuffy air in the cabin does horrid things to me, and I often have a headache by the time I disembark. Now I have to keep bothering the stewardesses for water, when I could very well have brought my own.

      I flew from Norfolk, VA to Phoenix about a week after the bans went into effect, and, yes, it was a pain (water + hall's cough drops are plane staples for me). What was even more annoying was that even if you bought something in one of the shops past security (which I did in Houston), you still couldn't take it on board with you. Thankfully, they're rescinded that now. While you have to be dry going through security, you can buy a bottle once you get inside.

    19. Re:It's just a freakin' reservation system by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      Here in the 2007s, we get to wait 2 hours, strip nekkid, walk through a metal detector, and have a bomb sniffing dog rammed up our asses whenever we go to the airports.
      You got the bomb sniffing dog? All I ever get rammed up my ass is the business end of a night stick, and they don't even use lube!
      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
  16. Re:Obvious? Mexican... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Jumping Beans?

    THIS patent gives the BEAN COUNTERS something to do with their COUNTER TOPS. AND, to boot, they get to SELL cookies while COUNTING and tracking cookies.

    Gives a new meaning to "mad dash" for the coffee.

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  17. Apple Out of New Ideas? Scary! by wdhowellsr · · Score: 1

    This is only one of possibly dozens of pre-existing patents. How about the Shell Gas Station rfid? That's been around for a least three to five million years! Just One Patent.

  18. Re:niggerdicks making their way up your rectum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Your patent application has been denied due to prior art on the part of your mom.

  19. There are examples of prior uses. TK Noodle, fyi. by digital+photo · · Score: 1

    I've seen the waiters at TK Noodle doing this for years now. Remote keypad system for taking and making orders.

    Unless they're patenting the "skipping ahead of line" part...

  20. Where's the bottleneck? by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1
    At most Starbucks I've been to, the bottleneck is not the ordering process, it's the order fulfillment side of things - That's where they're backed up.

    This seems to contrast with McDonald's, where the bottleneck is taking the orders (too many people don't start trying to decide what they want until they step up to the counter). As a result, here in Vancouver, Canada, lots of McDonalds have staff with wireless PDAs, wandering down the queues taking orders. When you get to the till all you have to do is pay and pick up your oder. They also wander down the queue at the drive through doing the same thing.

    1. Re:Where's the bottleneck? by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

      but now they can take your dough before the bottleneck, incentivising you to remain in line (duh, when everyone's using this the mobile line will be longer than the in person line.) Net result, fuller fulfillment queue and lower risk of employee idle time.

      I, for one, miss my robotic overlords. Vacation and employee relations were better.

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    2. Re:Where's the bottleneck? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "(too many people don't start trying to decide what they want until they step up to the counter"

      When an adult gets to the front of the line and doesn't knwo what they want, they shouldm go to the back of the line..and give everyone else in line a dollar.

      This technology would be great at fast food places because people who know what they want get there order in.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  21. Order numbers by Wowsers · · Score: 1

    So on your mobile phone you could have the following scenario.

    1. Please select if you want tea/coffee?
    2. Do you want that in regular / half-caf / decaf?
    3. You you want milk/extra cream with that?
    4. Do you want more than one of the same drink?
    5. Do you want to add other drinks to the order...
    6. ...

    We're sorry, your phone experienced a buffer overflow with the order number, get to a web browser on iamlazy.pointlessuseoftechnology.com and type the unique order number 659876543649746549876531 and it will be ready for you in store. Have a nice day.

    --
    Take Nobody's Word For It.
  22. WaWa - prior art by moosesocks · · Score: 1

    Although it's not *exactly* as Apple described, WaWa (world's most amazing convenience store/deli chain on the east coast) has had something similar for taking deli orders for a few years. You can't pay with it (although the capability has reportedly been there for some time), but it does take care of the rest of the ordering process.

    WaWa's system isn't particularly novel, but then again, neither is Apple's (which also doesn't deal particularly well with theft).

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  23. When the drink is ready go to... by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1
    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:When the drink is ready go to... by u235meltdown · · Score: 1

      thank you... I wasn't sure how many others caught this but I guess since this is /. it doesn't really matter

  24. I sip my coffee thank you very much by davidwr · · Score: 1

    I can't speak for the rest of the human race.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  25. Fight! by petehead · · Score: 1

    I can't wait to see a fight break out because someone has been waiting in line for 15 minutes and Mr. iphone walks in and gets served.

    That being said, how about they get this to work for fastpass and other services at Disneyland.

  26. countdown to domain registration by davidwr · · Score: 1

    How many minutes before someone registered pointlessuseoftechnology.com and redirects iamlazy.pointlessuseoftechnology.com to the local coffee-house?

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  27. Apple: Microsoft without the Love by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My local PC shop has been doing a similar thing for a couple of years. Sorry Apple: Your Patent Troll fails, but I'm sure Cleetus at the USPTO has already issued your patent.

  28. Misses the whole point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But... I love flirting with the staff at Starbucks. I certainly don't go for the coffee D:

  29. Jumped the Shark by SuperBanana · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1995 called...and wanted to remind Apple what happened the last time they got away from their core business of making computers and operating system software.

    It's a common downfall. Corporation X makes money doing something well, but either gets greedy, or starts to saturate the market...and looks elsewhere for revenue. Corporation X starts to spread to thin, outside its 'comfort zone', and abuses the trust consumers placed in the brand name. The brand name devalues. Company X finds itself competing against an upstart that is focused, and because its brand name has devalued, its high-margin items aren't selling.

    If you want to see a great example of this, look at Nintendo: despite the might of Microsoft, the Xbox 360 isn't what people are desperate to get their hands on, and the Wii isn't having problems with its online service. Nintendo is making money hand over fist on the Wii, and Microsoft just lost almost TWO BILLION DOLLARS on the Xbox division. Meanwhile, Vista is an absolute disaster, and the world is gunning for Office.

    I look at Apple and see warning signs too. Leopard's release *stunk*. There were the simplest bugs; they still haven't fixed an issue that causes the hard drive controller to lock up, and it took weeks for the fix to the "everything gets deleted if a file move to another volume fails" bug. The finder navigation related to file server volumes absolutely SUCKS, and frankly- the rest of the hundred-plus features are nothing but glitz, or grossly overdue (like workgroup calendaring.) About the only thing that was improved was Spotlight...

    1. Re:Jumped the Shark by __aailrp9629 · · Score: 1

      1995 called...and wanted to remind Apple what happened the last time they got away from their core business of making computers and operating system software.
      2001 called, and wanted to remind you that Apple's core business isn't making computers and operating system software.
    2. Re:Jumped the Shark by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Steve Jobs called...and wanted to remind you that the iPod made a shit load of money and made Apple a big brand name, and that while the X-box may be a financial disaster, the iPod and iPhone aren't.

      Say what you will about their business ethics regarding things like patents, but Steve Jobs is a very competent businessman. And because of that, general rules such as sticking to core business are less likely to apply here. In some ways, they haven't expanded that much. The iPhone is almost a natural spin-off of the iPod. It's not like they've jumped right into the gaming console market; all there non-computer products seem to be quite strongly related to their computer development if you look beneath the surface.

      Leopard could have done with a few more months, but they probably felt pressured after the iPhone delays. Hopefully they will learn their lesson and the next version will be a much smoother upgrade.

      You see, that's the difference for me. I believe that Apple do care about these kinds of things as well as their profits, so they are going to learn from it and improve. When I look at Microsoft, I get the impression they just don't care about their user experience, therefore I don't expect things to get much better with them.

      As for your specific issues, they are just part of computing, at the moment, unfortunately. I've never had those specific problems (although I've had other problems). I found several of the new features, that you haven't listed, as very useful. So this area can be quite subjective.

    3. Re:Jumped the Shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1995 called...and wanted to remind Apple what happened the last time they got away from their core business of making computers and operating system software.

      Ummm, Apple's core business of making computers and operating system software hasn't been doing well for a very very long time. Apple had to abandon their OS and go to a unix-clone based on Mach because their OS was so unstable.

      The ipod and itunes are what turned the company around. The margins on iphones are pretty good too.

  30. Make it so. by arbitraryaardvark · · Score: 1

    Tea. Earl Grey. Hot.

    1. Re:Make it so. by Scooter · · Score: 1

      Make it so? Oh yeah? Ever tried ordering a drink at Starbucks using a name that in any way describes what you'd like? It'd go like this:-

      Data: Captain, acting on the last crew feedback survey, we've done away with the replicator coffee and installed a branch of Starbucks on every deck - would you care to try it out?
      Picard: Tea. Earl Grey. Hot.
      Starbucks: Do you mean Breakfast Tea(TM) sir? or Tazo?
      Picard: ermm what is "breakfast tea" ?
      Starbucks: It's tea - like you drink at Breakfast(TM) sir.
      Picard: Is it hot?
      Starbucks: We accept no liability for injury caused by our product. The container does carry a full warning in most tea drinking languages sir.
      Picard: urm... very well: breakfast tea then
      Starbucks: A Tall one sir?
      Picard: er.. no just a regular sized tea please.
      Starbucks: Tall is the smallest we do sir.
      Picard: er.. of course (note to self, ask LaForge to look at the universal translator). Righto then.
      Starbucks: That'll be $23.55 sir.
      Picard: For a teabag and some water in a cup?!? Mr Worf - have we crossed into another dimension, or is this coffee shop in a future bubble of economic anomaly?
      Worf: No captain, it's just fucking expensive.
      Picard: Isn't that a bit expensive for a cup of tea? (and wait: we don't have currency in the 23rd century!)
      Starbucks: It's not just the tea sir, it's the bewildering experience too sir... would you like shaving foam on it?

      Crewman: I'd like a Grande skinny chocha mocha egg-nog latte with romulan syrup and angel dust on top with a bakewell slice.

      Buck Queen: We are the Buck. Asking for coffee is futile. Prepare to be granulated.

  31. bwa, ha, ha! by 0WaitState · · Score: 1

    If the Apple stores (real ones, like on the street) are any reference point, this point of sale system will be a piece of shit (thus finally unifying the POS acronym). I have never gotten through the register line in less than 10 minutes, even when there's only one person ahead of me. Then just try paying cash in an Apple store, and watch what happens--only one worker among them can do a cash transaction, and she's tied up on someone else's transactino.

    --

    Remain calm! All is well!
    1. Re:bwa, ha, ha! by reidconti · · Score: 1

      Que? I've only bought things in real Apple stores a couple of times, but it's about the quickest transaction you can make. Hell they even email you your receipt.

    2. Re:bwa, ha, ha! by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      Funny, I was just in an Apple store before Christmas to buy a gift. All I had to do was walk up to one of the employees standing around (no visible check out counter or line). I asked for the item I wanted. He went to the stockroom to retrieve it, swiped my credit card on a handheld POS and then went to a counter to retrieve a printed receipt for me. I was in and out of the store in under 2 minutes and there were easily over 60 customers during prime Chrismtas shopping hours. When I got home, there was a copy of the receipt in my email.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    3. Re:bwa, ha, ha! by stewbacca · · Score: 1
      Wow. Unfortunate timing for your unsubstantiated bitching, given the NY Times article that came out today that heaps tons of praise on the Apple Store retail model. The strength of the stores, according to the article, is the customer service. I'd like to know which store you frequent, because here in Austin, both stores have more employees than your average Wal-mart, and all of them have those little scanner thingies to ring you up anywhere in the store. I paid cash for my Airport Extreme and the guy with the scanner happily took my cash and walked it back to the register for me.

      http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/27/business/27apple.html?_r=1&ref=technology&oref=slogin

    4. Re:bwa, ha, ha! by 0WaitState · · Score: 1

      Palo Alto & San Francisco. Purchases over past 18 months have been (4 occasions): Ipod Nano Macbookpro 2nd power supply International power adapters Don't get me wrong--I like the products, but each time in store I found myself wondering how a company with such focus on UI and user experience could tolerate such disfunctional point-of-sales systems.

      --

      Remain calm! All is well!
    5. Re:bwa, ha, ha! by 0WaitState · · Score: 1

      Yes, they also offer you the convenience of emailing your receipt to you when you're standing at a register. The goal is to collect an email address.

      --

      Remain calm! All is well!
  32. Excellent... by Doonga2007 · · Score: 0

    I can buy an overpriced cup of coffee with my overpriced phone. What a deal!
    Note: I've played with an iPhone, it's cool, too bad it costs so much.

  33. Grr by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

    Zonk, for the love of Pete Townsend, please stop using hyphens in lieu of commas or parentheses! It is - without a doubt - highly annoying!

    (And I realize that the summaries are usually written by the submitters, but this makes two in a row with the same mind-crushing usage)

    1. Re:Grr by stewbacca · · Score: 1
      "Use em dashes, not hyphens, to indicate a break in thought." http:www.getitwriteonline.com/archive/091502.htm

      So the spirit of the hyphen is close in lieu of commas or parentheses, but you have to make it the longer em dash version. Your complaint is a common misconception about proper English grammar. Your example - without a doubt - is incorrect, in that it uses hyphens instead of em dashes (and only one would be needed at the beginning), and, well, isn't really a break in thought. A better way to think of this is to use em dashes in lieu of the semi-colon, since most Americans get confused on the proper use of semi-colons, colons, commas, and parentheses.

      (Cursed APA writing style and the grammar nazi college professors pushing it down my throat)

    2. Re:Grr by Swampash · · Score: 1

      It's called a "dash". Sorry if your public-school education missed that one out.

    3. Re:Grr by The_reformant · · Score: 1

      pff brackets are for losers..how much more readable is this?

      int foo-type bar-type baz-{
      doSomething-param1-param2-;
      }

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this post is too small to contain.
  34. nnice taggots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    good thing the tagging system only allows screened, registered users to post.

    we stopped all that hot grits nonsense, but i guess calling people a homophobic slur is ok.

  35. Apple doesn't care what you think by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

    You're scooping their products and services up at ever growing rates. Ranting about anything Apple does is like ranting about the Government; if you just bitch and aren't willing to follow through with action(i.e. stop using their products) then it's just a bunch of hot air.

    Their stock just hit $200/share for the first time...the do not CARE what any of you think about their practices.

  36. Re:There are examples of prior uses. TK Noodle, fy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless they're patenting the "skipping ahead of line" part...

    Shit .. I got prior art on that one since grade school.
  37. This is new? by cgreentx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes.. Everyone is saying practically the same thing here, but I've ordered items from the browser on my cell phone at Best Buy and Circuit City while standing at the Customer Service counter because the idiot managers refused to order their online prices... Minutes later my order was pulled and I got, imagine this, notification on my phone via email that my order was ready. Highly innovative there Apple.

  38. You missed the part by hax0r_this · · Score: 1

    where they do it from an iPhone. So they still get to act like a rich self important dick.

    1. Re:You missed the part by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Man, I use an iPhone and grab a coffee at Starbucks or Seattle's Best pretty much every morning (I'd prefer local, but none on my route to work). I never knew I was rich though! Maybe, just maybe, the overwhelming majority of Starbucks and Apple customers are, oh I dunno, middle class, like myself?

    2. Re:You missed the part by hax0r_this · · Score: 1

      Sorry, it was a joke. I was trying to decide whether it would be funnier if I said that they were rich until they bought an iPhone, which, on reflection might have been a better choice. Still, no offense intended, I'm hoping to buy one myself pretty soon here.

  39. Compare this with how Microsoft thinks - Surface by dircha · · Score: 1

    This is the difference in how Apple thinks vs how Microsoft thinks.

    Microsoft's solution to this problem - Microsoft Surface - is to say here's a huge, $10,000 table that customers can order from; replace all your diner's tables with Microsoft tables.

    Apple says, hey, wait a second, you don't need some huge, stupid table that has the very best interior design aesthetic Microsoft can offer, no, since everyone already carries a cell phone, why don't we just let you order and pay from your cell phone too?

    Now which company do you think is the wiser long term investment?

  40. Seriously by warrior_s · · Score: 1

    I think Microsoft's surface PC already does this.. although in a slightly different way.. but the idea is same... just give the order without waiting in line and while sitting at your table.

  41. Now there's news. by The+Second+Horseman · · Score: 1
    The Starbucks customer who thinks that ordering "coffee" you can't taste over the other 6 ingredients makes them look cool / sophisticated are some of the same folks who think that standing in line flashing around an Apple product makes them look sophisticated. It's another form of conspicuous consumption enabled by lifestyle marketing. Essentially, it's not much different than that staple of introductory Anthropology courses, Malinowski's description of Trobriand yam cultivation / display. http://books.google.com/books?id=wLa9KU1LaRQC&pg=RA2-PA169&lpg=RA2-PA169&dq=new+guinea+yams+rotting&source=web&ots=wLTl__4-HT&sig=kNsOq-GhZ2j-8tFmgKb50yFxtzw#PRA2-PA169,M1


    But hey, we Westerners are so much above all that. So, instead of wasting something that anyone can grow, we can use an obsolete-when-you-buy-it consumer electronic doodad to buy a cup of coffee (often lousy). Wow!

    1. Re:Now there's news. by nonsequitor · · Score: 1

      Essentially, it's not much different than that staple of introductory Anthropology courses, Malinowski's description of Trobriand yam cultivation / display.
      You're missing a big point, while the display of yams is for status, the purpose of the yams is to prevent starvation. So those who have the largest yams left on display are the most successful (least likely to starve). The difference between that and Apple as a status symbol is that anyone can buy an Apple product regardless of how successful they are. Sure, the high price may screen out the least wealthy among us. However, the bar is still set quite low, so low its not really indicative of success at all, just the desire to appear successful. The rotting of the yams was seen as a good thing, because that meant their emergency stores were more than adequate for the year. Using an iPhone to buy an over-priced shot of espresso or drip coffee is not a practice born of survival, just vanity. In short, its not fair to that tribe to compare their "status symbols" born of frugality with ours which are the result of gluttonous consumption.
    2. Re:Now there's news. by stewbacca · · Score: 1
      Your post says way more about your insecurities than it does about Apple users supposedly flaunting their devices in public. Did it ever occur to you that Apple users use their phones/laptops in public in pretty much the same was as that Dell guy over there and that Razr girl over there?

      Or better yet, maybe somebody IS sophisticated, and they just happen to use an Apple product (no correlation should be implied). I'm confused. Are you criticizing Apple products for wanting to be sophisticated, or are you criticizing sophisticated people for aspiring to be something more than a valued Wal-Mart customer?

    3. Re:Now there's news. by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Thanks for posting this. I've never figured out how people could consider a $150 mp3 player to be a status symbol, especially since anyone can buy one, and other mp3 players aren't dramatically cheaper.

    4. Re:Now there's news. by The+Second+Horseman · · Score: 1
      Actually, I'm criticizing people who think that they're making a broader personal statement by consuming. It's kind of like the "Grey Goose vodka" taste test done by one of the TV magazines a while back - none of the people who swore by it couldn't pick it out in a taste test, for obvious reasons when you think about what vodka is. It's the idea of an association with the company or other customers that drives sales long term, not the product. Brand loyalty gets largely set in concrete by a fairly young age. And while the original iPod was clearly better than the competition at the time, I think that's a harder case to make with the low-end models now, and I'd question if the higher end models were worth the premium. But people don't comparison shop, don't evaluate alternatives, etc. I mean, do you really think waiting outside all night for an iPhone was actually rational? If you think about it, anyone who want was paying extra for the phone (demonstrated by the later price drop), and spent hours in line. And it was to buy something that's going to end up in a landfill in a couple of years, since most consumers don't bother properly disposing of electronics. Sure, it felt like an event, but it was a marketing event created by the company with the help of "news" outlets. It seemed like a hollow event, sort of a sad shadow of an actual happening. Kind of like kids going to trick or treat at the local shopping mall.


      And by the way, I don't shop at Wal-Mart. Personally, I can't stand their labor policies. However, I'd argue that if you're spending a ton of money on mass-marketed consumer goods that aren't essentials, regardless of where you're buying them, you're not doing much to be better than "a valued Wal-Mart customer." We're all becoming pack rats, attracted to shiny objects. Well, with energy prices headed where they're going, it's all a house of cards anyway.

    5. Re:Now there's news. by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm criticizing people who think that they're making a broader personal statement by consuming.
      I see this thrown around a lot on slashdot, primarily because I stick to the Apple threads. What I don't understand is why people who don't use Apple products think that we Apple advocates are trying to make some personal statement. MOST of us are just using a product that we like, just like any Dell user, just like any Zune user, and just like any Nokia user. It's my money, dammit, and I like to own good stuff for ME, not to impress other people.

      But people don't comparison shop, don't evaluate alternatives, etc.
      After several years, and many failed ventures away from my comfort brands, I really have no incentive to evaluate alternatives. GM cars will always continue to suck in comparison to a trusty Honda model. Same thing goes for me with Apple products, regardless if they are becoming the evil empire or not. I used to care about this stuff, but eventually we all grow up and just buy what we know will work, even if there is the slightest chance that something else out there might be better.

      I mean, do you really think waiting outside all night for an iPhone was actually rational?
      Of course it wasn't. Lining up at midnight for Halo3, Harry Potter, or Win95 was also not very rational.

      We're all becoming pack rats, attracted to shiny objects.
      I spent 22 years of my life getting a good education to attain the nice career I have now. I don't really think it is anybody's place to criticize what I spend my money on, nor is it my place to care what others spend their money on. If I like shiny things, so what? While there may be some people who flaunt it, MOST of us don't care one bit what you think about our stuff.
  42. Actual patent information by mosch · · Score: 1

    If you want to read the actual 64 claims, check out the Patent.

    I'm all for patent outrage, but this one isn't a good example, unless you're against all IP protection, everywhere.

    1. Re:Actual patent information by mosch · · Score: 1

      Claims can be independant (in which case they are OR'd) or dependent (in which case they are AND'd). It all depends on the exact language in the claim itself.

  43. Apples is doing this in their own stores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple is already doing this in at least some of the bricks & mortar apple stores.

    There are people walking around the store with some kind of portable scanner. They scan your purchase, swipe your credit card, and e-mail you a receipt. You only have to wait in line if you are paying cash.

  44. Re: Prior Art - Finns have been using SMS long ago by tomtermite · · Score: 1

    I call PRIOR ARt... check out how they do it in Finnland (via SMS)... text the number of the (coke machine | coffee bar | bus route) and get your (soda | receipt for hot beverage | bus pass)...

    http://virtual.finland.fi/netcomm/news/showarticle.asp?intNWSAID=42626

    --
    - Ubique, Tom Termini www.bluedog.net - WebObjects / J2EE SOA / iPhone solutions for knowledge workers
  45. Re:Fandango... ie CROOKS by timeOday · · Score: 1

    Fandango is also terribly expensive for what it is. I guess life is pretty easy when your only competition is Ticketmaster.

  46. The unique element is the point to point commo... by argent · · Score: 1

    About the only difference between this and existing schemes that I can see is that it's using a point to point connection between the Starbucks kit and the iPhone, instead of going off to some webserver off in the Internet.

  47. If some Apple iPod fanboy .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    jumps in front of me when I'm queueing, their iPod will be docked where the sun don't shine!

  48. Queue geek fight by dave562 · · Score: 1

    I can see it now. Two twits in the Silicon Valley at a Starbucks, both named Steve. One of them claims that the venti, half skim, half soy, extra hot latte with a shot is his because the girl at the counter announced it is for Steve. The other guy claims it his because his iPhone buzzed. Much hillarity ensues and in the end, the guy with his Treo running Windows Mobile OS gets his tall drip coffee first because well, he did it the old fashioned way because Windows Mobile wasn't Starbucks compatible.

    1. Re:Queue geek fight by dave562 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I forgot to mention how this is going to breed pretentious attitudes from guys who don't bother to talk to anybody in Starbucks and then scoff at the employees for not automatically knowing that they are there for their coffee because, "Duh, I iOrdered it with my iPhone iHead of time." The next thing they are going to want is an iRedCarpet rolled out for them when their Apple software alerts Starbucks that they are nearing the store... but that functionality would take a GPS, and the iPhone doesn't have one. Oops.

    2. Re:Queue geek fight by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It actually doesn't take a GPS to do that. In fact, GPS would be the wrong way to do that.
      OTOH, you were to busy posting something to make yourself think you are smart to actually think.

      What this is going to 'breed' is shorter lines and less of a wait... and a bunch or people like you that sneer at people who use technology to make their life easier.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  49. Are you high? by marcmac · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Last time Apple "got away from their core business of making computers and operating system software" they invented the friggin' iPhone - maybe you've heard of it? Or did you miss the announcement because your iPod was too loud? (iPod being the time before last that they "got away from their blah blah blah".

    Seriously - AAPL is at $200, and Apple marketshare is growing, precisely because of this kind of lifestyle stuff.

    1. Re:Are you high? by phalse+phace · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nope. The last time Apple "got away from their core business of making computers and operating system software" they invented (overpriced) iPod socks. Yes, you read that correctly.... socks.

    2. Re:Are you high? by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Something tells me that Apple is a bit too busy to make socks, but is plenty eager to offer a third-party accessory (socks) on their online store. This is the exact sort of lifestyle thing the previous post is talking about. Apple gets it, slashdot users don't. More people in the world would buy a sock for their iPods than would register an account on slashdot (as if that mattered one bit, other than Apple understands what their customers want).

  50. Tilt Toward iPhone Users and I Walk by reallocate · · Score: 0

    The first guy with an iPhone who jumps ahead of me at Starbucks might just get some coffee spilled on his shirt. Orders should be taken first come, first served, period. If someone gives iPhone users an advantage, I'll go elsewhere.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    1. Re:Tilt Toward iPhone Users and I Walk by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Orders should be taken first come, first served, period.
      You've obviously missed the point that every bank, coffee shop, and fast food restaurant in America gives priority to the drive-through window customers. Are you gonna run outside and spill your coffee on the drive-through customers?
    2. Re:Tilt Toward iPhone Users and I Walk by reallocate · · Score: 1

      News to me. I'm rarely at fastfood joints, much less the drivethru. I was inside some coffee shop recently ordering at the counter. Midway through, the kid stops taking my order and starts yapping on his headset. I walked out.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    3. Re:Tilt Toward iPhone Users and I Walk by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I bet this was the same kid that was on my lawn last week. Damn kids.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    4. Re:Tilt Toward iPhone Users and I Walk by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Restaurants do it to, they are called 'Reservations'.
      Ever make one? You're a hippocrate

      Pizza places do it, they are called 'Call in orders'
      Ever make one? You're a hippocrate

      Bookstores do it, it's called putting books on hold.
      Ever have a book store do that for you? You're a hippocrate

      Movie theaters do it, it's called 'buying on line'
      Ever do that? You're a hippocrate

      ER rooms don't take people in the order they arrive.

      When someone at a grocery store get's into a shorter line, do you spill coffee on them?

      Every business does this in some form.
      Enjoy staying at home, and not buying ANYTHING at all, ever again.

      I look forward for punching you in the face in self defense when you assault me.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Tilt Toward iPhone Users and I Walk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was always bothered by that hippocrate in "Madagascar". It seems to me that it should have been built out of heavier material than the lioncrate or the zebracrate; not sure about the giraffecrate - low density but large mass overall.

    6. Re:Tilt Toward iPhone Users and I Walk by reallocate · · Score: 1


      Tsk, tsk. Such a literalist. Must be an engineer.

      And, it's hypocrite. Hippocrate's was the ancient Greek doctor who came up with that oath, you know.

      Obviously, I'm unlikely to assault someone who orders coffee with a phone. But I am very likely to stop patronizing a shop that makes me wait because someone else called ahead. I mean, we're talking about coffee, which takes only a few seconds to prepare for a customer. How much time is gained by ordering a cup of coffee in advance? Maybe they'll pour the coffee as soon as they get the call, so it will be nice and cold when that customer arrives.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  51. You mean, like those electronic coasters? by istartedi · · Score: 1

    This sounds a lot like those electronic wireless coasters that restaurants have been using for years. You're re-purposing a general-purpose device (a phone) to do what the special-purpose device (the coaster) already does.

    Usually the coasters are used to buzz you at the bar or wherever, to let you know your table is ready. I've also seen them used after you've paid to let you know your food has been prepared. All they're doing is replacing the register with a web site, and programming the coaster functionality into a phone.

    I'm inclined to file this with "one-click".

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  52. Prior art found in March 2, 2000, New York Times by vrmlguy · · Score: 4, Informative
    I thought that this sounded familiar, so I Googled some keywords and immediately found this: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9406E5DF1139F931A35750C0A9669C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all

    The introduction of the cell phone into the process can change things greatly, said David Sacks, vice president for strategy at PayPal.com. He conjured a scene from the wireless future: ''Walk down the street, a few blocks away from your favorite Starbucks, pull out your Web-connected cell phone, you get a Starbucks menu, click espresso, and it's sent. And you've not only ordered it, but you've paid and you can go pick it up.''
    --
    Nothing for 6-digit uids?
  53. The difference: by SacredByte · · Score: 1

    The difference between the U.S. patent system and most patent systems of other countries is that the U.S. patent system is based around the idea of "First to invent" rather than "First to patent." Its like awarding the first post to the first person who thinks about posting rather than the first person who actually submits a post. The advantage of this system is that it prevents the "Lobachevsky"(1) issue by providing a way to get rid of bogus patents by proving prior art. Thus, all I would have to do to get awarded first post is prove that I was the first to think up/to [a] post. 1: From a Tom Lehrer song; Google "I have a friend in Minsk"

  54. I worked as a barista for a long time.. by msimm · · Score: 1

    But before Starbucks brought the masses to coffee. Working there you get accustomed to specialized drinks and I actually became too embarrassed to ask for the drink I would drink. When cappuccinos hit Hollywood is when I finally just gave up and started drinking coffee or tea. It's embarrassing when the drink you want contains 5 or more words in the name. But it's ridiculous when you see people ordering them from chain that would be lucky to make a simple pot of coffee.

    --
    Quack, quack.
    1. Re:I worked as a barista for a long time.. by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      It's embarrassing when the drink you want contains 5 or more words in the name.
      I dunno, "Large Latte" works for me. Sometimes I add "Please" and "with two sugars". Does that make six words? I guess I could say "Make me one of those double shot's of espresso with the steamed milk", but "latte" seems to get me the same thing every time.
  55. there coming for us by simpleflow · · Score: 1

    apple's trying to take over the world....

  56. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  57. Wow, thats cool and all, but... by denmarkw00t · · Score: 1

    I have a better idea. When I first stared reading the summary, this is what came to mind and now I'm sorely disappointed in TFA : /

    So, you're on the bus/plane/sub or elsewhere with your iPhone or iPod Touch and you pick up another i* device nearby with some sweet tunes that you'd like to have. Why not let you listen to it, like iTunes and other computers in your subnet, but then allow you to purchase the track and download it via wifi to your iPhone/Touch?

    Oh, and Apple, this is patent pending :P

  58. Nearly as evil as Google. by Ophion · · Score: 1

    And it is nearly as ominous as another recent Apple patent application. "Trusted Computing" is back? You'd better believe it.

  59. welcome to the future. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    when clicking on the link to read the story i was redirected to an ad page. no problem. at least no problem until i seen how forbes worded it: click here to skip our welcome screen.
     
    yip, that's the image of the future that i'm talking about. in order to pay the heating bill for mcdonalds you're going to have to pause at the door to see an advert screened on it before you can go in.
     
    it's going to be great!
     
    needless to say, i didn't bother going further into forbes.com. i won't be going back.

  60. Insurance by logicpaw · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is simply insurance and has little to do with patenting something new. The patent office occasionally grants marginal and outright flaky patents, and will continue to do so even if the current process is improved somewhat. For a big company (read: deep pockets lawsuit target) it's cheaper to file a patent on something ambiguously new or obvious, and have it rejected, than to be the subject of a suit from a troll who got lucky with a nearly identical filing under some hidden submarine title. If granted, even if by sheer luck, it might still add to their cross-licensing/defense portfolio.

  61. Re:Compare this with how Microsoft thinks - Surfac by ibjhb · · Score: 1

    Are you serious? You think Microsoft Surface is just to order a coffee without standing in line?

    You have to be the poster-child for Apple fan-boys. Wow.

  62. This is great, by Fengpost · · Score: 1

    now only if Apple would set up the same service with Mustang Ranch and we can get serviced by using iPhone.

    --
    The purpose of writing is to inflate weak ideas, obscure poor reasoning, and inhibit clarity....Calvin
    1. Re:This is great, by user+no.+590291 · · Score: 2, Funny

      now only if Apple would set up the same service with Mustang Ranch and we can get serviced by using iPhone.
      If you paid $500 for a phone and are locked into a $60/month contract with the NSA^W^W AT&T, I'd say you're already being "serviced" without the need of the Mustang Ranch.
  63. Why not? What's good for Egypt is good for Apple by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Next thing you know, they will be copyrighting apple trees and sueing farmers. Egypt is trying to copyright the Pyramids.
    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  64. Re:Compare this with how Microsoft thinks - Surfac by stewbacca · · Score: 1

    To be fair, the one promo video I've seen of the surface table focused solely on the ability to order food from the menu at a restaurant using the surface table technology.

  65. IBM by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Wish I could remember the name of one.

    International Business Machines.
    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  66. I would use this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have starbucks anxiety.. I get nervous and awkwardly shout the first thing on the menu I see.. If the person taking the order is a pretty girl, the problem is even worse.

  67. Small town. by bigattichouse · · Score: 1

    I live in a small town. I can walk in to the local shop and grab a cup of coffee from the machine. I walk out. Periodically, I drop a few bucks at the counter. I wirelessly wave to the cashier.

    --
    meh
  68. Joymaker by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    Witness, the birth of the real-world Joymaker.

  69. Already been done by andrewm_za · · Score: 2, Informative

    And it works on any phone. Order online, via WAP, or via SMS and your phone is linked to your credit card. http://www.gomobo.com/

    1. Re:Already Been Done by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You would have a point, if that was what the patent was about.

      It's about how it works, not the concept of ordering wirelessly. Not that I should expect anyone on /. to understand that.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  70. I spent $500 on this phone.... by svunt · · Score: 1

    ...and all I got was a punch in the face from a caffeine addict with a Nokia! Seriously, I don't mind using mobile phones for convenience, but the day someone jumps the queue because he owns an iPhone is the day I punch a member of the mac community in the face.

    1. Re:I spent $500 on this phone.... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Bring it on. I do this now.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  71. If one is thirsty... by dangitman · · Score: 1

    ... why would one order coffee?

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  72. Already Been Done by Seahawker101 · · Score: 2, Informative

    This has already been done by Nintendo at Safeco Field in Seattle. They introduced a paid service where you can use your DS to order food and have it brought up to you while watching the game. Apple's doing exactly what Sony does, copy a good idea and call it your own.

    --
    Nothing inspires forgiveness quite like revenge.---Scott Adams
  73. Enter the Matrix by Stele · · Score: 1

    I think Apple is really just preparing everyone for their inevitable iMatrix, where you just plug yourself in and never leave your house.

    I mean, look at how they have cultivated the little zone of personal space people get in with their little white earbuds. Doing this just removes the personal contact one can get when going into a coffee shop: chatting with the employees, developing a personal relationship, as minor as it is, with another human being.

  74. I thought of this years ago... by gavinpquinn · · Score: 1

    I actually tried to patent this years ago. I thought that with bluetooth and cell phones, coffee shops could display their menu on your cell phone and you could order from there. I thought you could even bill through it securely. I hired a patent attorney and realized it was patented about 4 years before me...

  75. Mod parent redundant: someone did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ATM machine Mod parent redundant.... Parent's moderation:

    Starting Score: 1 point
    Moderation +4
        70% Informative
        20% Interesting
        10% Redundant
    Total Score: 5
  76. Macdonalds had this six years ago. by Muchsake · · Score: 1

    Its just good service.

    As I walked in the door of my local MacDonalds for breakfast one of the counter staff would call out "No cheese!". By the time I had walked past the queue to reach the counter my order would be on it and my penny change in the charity box. I was definitely wireless as the used optical technology (human eyeball). It was just good service as they knew I had the sausage and egg MacMuffin meal with orange juice and no cheeses. Whenever anyone queried why I did not queue they said I had ordered ahead by telepathy

  77. Re:Prior art found in March 2, 2000, New York Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good find.
    Just like ordering from the BestBuy/Whoever website and picking up in the store.

    I'm getting the impression that "....on a mobile phone" is the next patent secret phrase. Just like "....online" and "....on a computer" were before it.

  78. I often do this now by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Walking to a pizza place, it's busy. So I call in an order. Often when I get to the front of the line my order is ready.

    Busy store? ask them to hold something for you. The jst go to customer service and pick it. Many time I can pay for it at the same time.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  79. Prior art indeed by tekiegreg · · Score: 1

    Notwithstanding everyone else's prior art that they found which all seems valid; the first way I thought of invalidating this is the Exxon/Mobil Speedpass system that's been around since 1997 according to the article. Long before I remember seeing the first Mp3 player from Apple.

    --
    ...in bed
  80. In spite of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In spite of all patent trolls from google and apple we are going to launch soon and we are going for the fight because clearly this is another monopolization effort and a shame for the world. We might be contacting the FSF soon for help in case the try to use what is clearly no innovation at all against us.

    http://aircash.sourceforge.net/

    Now is not enough that the neutrality on the devices is near zero banning third parties from publishing putting on top the companies that manufacture devices clearly in violation of the sherman act raping both the righs of software developers and device owners. Companies own the device they sold to you. How much mankind is going to fall permiting such violations of the rights of consumers? On top of that now we got software patents we certainly can't cover if they even let us use it. Fortunately we registered the project earlier than any of those patents granted by likely corrupt judges and has been public ever since therefore we can proove anything on any court. And also there are a lot of links on the internet that can proove previous art from other companies. Shame on you Steve Jobs. Be a honorable man and not the Rat you are becoming side by side with Larry. You learn fast to be a rat. You definitely do. But again... There is going to be war. We are going to launch IN SPITE OF THIS PROVOCATIONS.

  81. OpenBSD icon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even Apple Wireless technology has its own icon but OpenBSD doesn't?

  82. Order by Txt? by kiwipeso · · Score: 1

    Why not just save the bother of being in the store, and send it by txt first?
    Subway do this in NZ, it works well.

    --
    - Kaos games and encryption systems developer
  83. and now... by scolbert · · Score: 0

    and now my iPhone will be wanting a grande non-fat latte and will be able to order it itself.

  84. business ethics by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

    Say what you will about their business ethics regarding things like patents

    Don't hate the player, hate the game. The way the U.S. patent system is set up, your company patents everything in sight, even though most of it is bullshit. This is so that if another company tries to sue you from infringing on their bullshit patent, you try and find a way to counter-sue. Apple would be unethical if they acted as a patent troll, but I haven't seen any evidence that they've done that.