Slashdot Mirror


Which Distro For an Eee PC?

An anonymous reader writes "I've got an Eee PC 1000HD, and frankly, I can't stand XP. I know it's odd, because I actually like Vista, but XP is such a giant piece of crap on here that I struggle to use it day-by-day. Anyway, my question is this: which Linux distro should I run on it? Plain Ubuntu just doesn't have driver support. I tried Ubuntu-eee, which, to put it bluntly, does not work for me at all (slow, terrible battery life, even worse interface). I've heard that Jaunty Jackalope is going to have better netbook support, but that's all the way in April! Is there a distro out now that will free me from XP's terribleness without being terrible itself?" Getting wireless working on an Eee PC (though in my experience imperfectly) with stock Ubuntu is possible; for me it took some googling, though I've been told with great enthusiasm that it actually works "out of the box." What distros are you running on your netbook, and what problems do you find?

466 comments

  1. XandrOS or EeeOS? by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Informative
    Disclaimer, I do not own an eeePC (keyboard too damn small) so I have not tried any of these things. Two things I found while searching around is the Linux OS that is shipped with the eeePC Linux versions and that is XandrOS, a debian based Linux. You need to torrent it I think to avoid some $10 bandwidth fee. So search on your favorite torrent site.

    Also there is EeeOS which claims to be:

    EeeOS is designed to be a minimalistic Custom Debian Distribution that provides a base system (drivers, system tools, Xorg) and nothing more. The idea behind such a release is so that users of Eee Linux OS can configure and build their own Eee experience ... an EeeXperience if you will :P While systems like Ubuntu, Fedora, Suse and Xandros are all amazing in their own right, they often come pre-configured and with a lot of bloat. Some power users prefer to have complete control over their systems and it is with these users in mind that Eee OS was created.

    I was going to go on a lengthy explanation about how you could use Slackware or Gentoo to provide the optimal configuration you are interested in but after reading your summary, I doubt you're interested in this sort of devotion to squeezing your eeePC like a lemon over your enemy's eye.

    ... though I've been told with great enthusiasm that it actually works "out of the box."

    Ubuntu has worked "out of the box" for two of my DLink WiFi cards. It worked on a no name CompUSA brand rebate PCMCIA card on my laptop but there were ... annoyances ... with lack of encryption options.

    Also, why did you go with an Eee Ubuntu and not Xubuntu ... which I guess would be more widely supported?

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by evilkasper · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have a eee701 I've found this to be a handy resource http://forum.eeeuser.com/index.php Mostly I run Xandros on mine, just for convenience. I do however have several distros on thumb drives in case I feel like a change. Just curious because I'm used to people complaining about Vista and how they like XP, what about XP do you not like? Again just curious.

    2. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by Stormwatch · · Score: 3, Informative

      Xandros and Novell signed those sick "covenant not to sue" deals with Microsoft.

      So I'll sign a covenant not to touch their crap with a barge pole.

    3. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by Joce640k · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just so you know ... EeePC 1000 keyboards are only 10% smaller than normal size.

      --
      No sig today...
    4. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by jon3k · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually it's like 7-8% smaller, they're 92% or 93% sized keyboards. Also the 901HA (or one of the 900 series) has the larger keyboard as well.

    5. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by Tetsujin · · Score: 2, Informative

      The 904 is the same size as the 1000 series, but with a 9" screen. Probably that's the one you're thinking of.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    6. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by wastedlife · · Score: 1

      Well, XP Pro is usually the OS people pine for when they gripe about Vista. XP Home edition is what is normally supplied by OEMs with netbooks. XP Home is an abomination of an OS. The only good thing about XP Home that I can say is that the drivers for my D-Link wireless card do not crash Home, only Pro. Although the Stop error I get in Pro states that the drive is trying to use a higher IRQ level than the system granted, so I'd assume that means Home is just allowing it by.

      --
      Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
    7. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by kimvette · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're just small enough to throw off touch typing.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    8. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by King_TJ · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have an eee701 myself, and I played with several Linux OS's on it, but kept coming back to Xandros as well.

      There's apparently a guy who has an ongoing project to take the original Asus distribution of Xandros for eeePC and tweak, update and improve it.

      Links to his latest builds can be found over at http://www.xepc.org/en. (Unfortunately for me, the site is basically a blog written in Chinese, that gets run through a translator when you ask for the English version with the /en on the end of the URL. So it's still hard to read at times.)

      It doesn't look like he's posted anything new since the end of 2008 ... but if I understand it correctly, he's saying his last build of his customized Xandros was submitted to Asus to become an official update image at some point in the near future.

    9. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I run easypeasy wich is a ubuntu fork with a cool netbook interface that runs really well on my 701.

    10. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by Zordak · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Typing this on a 904HA, which I've had for three or four weeks. The only thing that really throws off my typing is the right shift key. I don't know who made that design choice, but it was stupid. If not for that, it would be pretty much perfect. I paid $350 for the thing, including shipping, and it's perfect for using on the bus or plane when a regular laptop is just too cumbersome.

      I wiped the second partition and added FC 10, which worked out of the box, including wireless.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    11. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by DeBaas · · Score: 1

      Also, why did you go with an Eee Ubuntu and not Xubuntu ... which I guess would be more widely supported?

      Actually I did on my 901. That went perfect. I followed the very simple instructions at http://www.array.org/ubuntu/ It took the installation of one .deb, a reboot and wireless, sound, bluetooth and wifi were all working. Afterwards just added the array.orgs repository, installed the extra scripts through that repository and even the Fn keys and special keys in the laptop worked perfectly.

      This weekend I however installed the eeepc version of http://crunchbanglinux.org/wiki/release-notes/8.10.02#cruncheee_eee_pc_edition To me that's even better. Everything works out of the box and you can use the Ubuntu repositories for nearly everything you may want to install later. It responds really well. I even watch divx in the train, with the eeepc on powersave mode. They do use openbox which I have quite some experience in and really like. But if you like Vista you probably don't like openbox.
      Only downside to me is the interface, which in my view is a little to dark.

      --
      ---
    12. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by Zencyde · · Score: 1

      Well, I DO have an Eee PC 701 (was an early adopter) and am running Cruncheee on it. Here's a handy and helpful link: http://www.crunchbanglinux.org/wiki/downloads#cruncheee_eee_pc_edition

      It should be noticed that I've experienced a small graphics glitch or two. Though, this seems to be an isolated problem. Worst case scenario, you wasted some bandwidth. It's pretty quick, though. I'd give it a shot.

      --
      What day is it? Could you please tell me?
    13. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If he wants Jaunty so much why doesn't he just use it? It's not officially released yet but obviously it exists. There are daily builds available for download.

    14. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kura bura manga ma? binga ho mula ba! binga ru ala? u mara mara so stupid

    15. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      Take LXDE as a desktop environment and use Debian as your distribution.

    16. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by Herby+Sagues · · Score: 1

      If you actually like Vista (I don't) you should check Windows 7 out. Yes, it's beta, but it it's stable enough for daily use without issues, and it is ligh and fast as XP, with Vista glitter and features.

    17. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by zaivala · · Score: 1

      There are a LOT of Eee distros just from Ubuntu or based on Ubuntu, including Eeebuntu, Ubuntu Eee, and Ubuntu Netbook Remix. But I have purchased several machines for myself and others, and all but one had the Asus version of Xandros. It works like a dream unless you want to use the "power user" stuff, and as I haven't needed that I don't even remember how to get to that level. The later 901s have a somewhat more robust version of Asus Xandros than my earlier 701s. I will point out that Asus, not Xandros, supports their Linux (especially good since Xandros has gone the way of Lindows, along WITH all the old Lindows/Linspire stuff).

    18. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by dudpixel · · Score: 0

      i have a msi wind and opensuse 11.1 (with update to kde 4.2) works very well.

      That said, I kept winxp on it too (dual boot with 60GB each) because I found it ran very well.

      Pretty much all hardware worked out of the box on both (thanks to the custom windows install that comes with it).

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    19. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by tezbobobo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Any particular reason you're against Microsoft? They're only trying to make money for their shareholders and nothing stops you from using and developing another OS/App suite/etc...

    20. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by ottothecow · · Score: 1

      For me (1000h) the best option is standard ubuntu (xubuntu in this case) with the array.org kernel and modifications and some guy's acpi scripts (elmurato or something).

      All the info needed is on the eeeuser.com forums.

      it works perfectly, the only issues I have are with backlight autodimming (which is a gnome-power-manager documented bug...not eee specific)

      --
      Bottles.
    21. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by paganizer · · Score: 1

      The Beta is pretty cool, and is to my eyes as nimble as XP.
      However, they recently released a list of some of the crap that is going to be in the release version; it could, conceivably be faster than Vista when it releases, but there is no chance it will be as nimble as XP.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    22. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by zirdox · · Score: 1

      In other news: I installed the Fedora 10 distro from a USB flash drive. This works perfect. I've had no hardware issues and wifi works great! The only problem so far is that wifi connections die if you enter sleep mode. I havn't looked into the problem as my install base is only a couple of days old - but all in all Fedora 10 delivers. I know it's not a "Mini" Linux - but it works - and no hardware issues.

    23. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      It's not about their crappy products. It's the fact that this "covenant not to sue" is extortion on top of defamation.

      "Nice userbase you get there. You know, it seems Linux violates some patents of ours... what patents? Oh, let's not discuss details. Still, wouldn't it be a pity if we had to sue you out of existence?"

      If it were up to me, I'd sic all my lawyers on them. That filthy, repulsive, immoral, giant bag of lard, ape-like, chair-throwing, semiliterate SON OF A BITCH Steve Ballmer should be in jail for this bullshit, because this kind of behaviour is criminal.

    24. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by stanjam · · Score: 1

      I have the 1000, and I use Eeebuntu (as opposed to Ubuntu eee, now called Easy Peasy). WHen used with eee-control everything works, including customisable hotbuttons, one of which I have set to toggle the touchpad. Also I can adjust the ybrid engine. Very nice distro.

      --
      Open Source: Eroding the Digital Divide
    25. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you like vista, you might wanna try to find a distribution with kde 4.2, it's fancy on effects, while still staying usable.

    26. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by evilkasper · · Score: 1

      I generally run XP pro at work, but on one of my home computers I have Vista Ultimate 64, I tried the beta of Win7 up until about last week. To my eye it doesn't seem to be all that different than Vista 64. I was really hoping they'd make a slimmer OS with less bloat.

    27. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      If you've got a PC so powerful you can run Vista Ultimate 64, I don't think you're in any position to be talking about bloat.

      I'd never think of installing Vista on my netbook, but Windows 7 runs quite happily with the Aero theme.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    28. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by evilkasper · · Score: 1

      Give me a break It's not like the requirements for Vista 64 Ultimate are unattainable by mere mortals. I built it for gaming, it's less than a year old and cost under $900. The fact that I spent money to buy new hardware does not take away my right to bitch about a bloated OS.

    29. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      It does take away your ability to perceive what is or is not bloat.

      I've got an Intel 945 and the equivalent to a 1Ghz Celeron in my machine. It simply wouldn't run Vista with Aero. Windows 7 runs just as quickly as Windows XP -- that is to say, so fast I stop caring about speed. Besides the space set aside for swap and hibernation, the size of the OS is nearly the same as Windows XP. Where's the bloat?

      --
      It's been a long time.
    30. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by awrowe · · Score: 1

      That filthy, repulsive, immoral, giant bag of lard, ape-like, chair-throwing, semiliterate SON OF A BITCH Steve Ballmer should be in jail for this bullshit, because this kind of behaviour is criminal.

      No don't hold back, tell us what you really think of him.

      --
      A.I. Research. The peculiar science in which we know the question and we know the answer, but can't show the working
    31. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Xandros and Novell signed those sick "covenant not to sue" deals with Microsoft.

      You mean to say, "Xandros and Novell milked MS for several hundred million, for free"?

      Because that's really all there is to it, as it finally turned out.

    32. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by evilkasper · · Score: 1

      How do you figure. Just because I have a fast machine, does not mean it is my only machine, nor the only machine I work with. I have a machine that is about 6 or 7 yrs old run Xp Pro on it, Win7 would not work on it, and this is just the beta you are referring to, they recently released a list full of stuff/crap that is going to be in the release version THAT is the bloat I am talking about. Not the BETA.

    33. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Ah, in that case, I agree. I really enjoy the beta, but I won't pay for (or steal) the final product, because of the crap they're going to add. In particular, their copy protection has actually locked me out of legitimate copies of Windows XP. If they think I'm going to drop a few hundred dollars on something they have no problem arbitrarily taking away, they're nuts.

      --
      It's been a long time.
  2. Ubuntu by DesertBlade · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ubuntu makes a nice EEE distro.

    But since you like Vista there may be nothing we can do.

    --
    Half of writing history is hiding the truth.
    1. Re:Ubuntu by metallicagoaltender · · Score: 4, Interesting

      +1 on Ubuntu. I picked up an Eee 1000H this past weekend and installing Easy Peasy (the poorly named Ubuntu Eee distro) via flash drive was ridiculously easy. Everything worked right off the bat without any messing around with config files. The "Netbook Remix" interface is sort of annoying, but very easy to turn off.

    2. Re:Ubuntu by onecheapgeek · · Score: 2, Funny

      Anyway, my question is this: which Linux distro should I run on it? Plain Ubuntu just doesn't have driver support. I tried Ubuntu-eee, which, to put it bluntly, does not work for me at all (slow, terrible battery life, even worse interface). I've heard that Jaunty Jackalope is going to have better netbook support, but that's all the way in April! Is there a distro out now that will free me from XP's terribleness without being terrible itself?

      Brilliant advice. Really, you are a model of reading comprehension.

    3. Re:Ubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would've made it even better is to replace "Terribleness" with "Terribloscity"

    4. Re:Ubuntu by Hal_Porter · · Score: 0, Redundant

      If he prefers Vista to XP he'd probably like Suse or Linspire more than Ubuntu.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    5. Re:Ubuntu by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Ubuntu makes a nice EEE distro.

      I understand it works out of the box for the original Eee, but for the 901 - and presumably the closely related 1000 - neither wired nor wireless networking work. You'll need to install a custom kernel to get those going. Otherwise, everything's fine here.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    6. Re:Ubuntu by OolimPhon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not so. My son got a 901 and the wired network worked out of the box. For the wireless, about 5 minutes googling found us the answer - a misconfiguration problem that updating a config file (I forget which one - this was 6 months ago) fixed.

    7. Re:Ubuntu by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      If he like Vista he would probably love Vixta which is just a version of Linux designed with the Vista bling, complete with gadgets and black taskbar.

      That said I don't see why he just doesn't add the Vista bling to XP with Vista Transformation Pack which will give him all the bling and get rid of the awful blue "fisher price look" of XP. While I will take XP over Vista any day of the week even I admit the black taskbar looks better than that horrible blue.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    8. Re:Ubuntu by Miseph · · Score: 1

      But both look a thousand times worse than the "Classic" Win2k theme where everything is just a simple gray box.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    9. Re:Ubuntu by Paua+Fritter · · Score: 1

      I also installed Easy-Peasy (despite the bogus name) a couple of days ago. It all worked. It is far better in every way than the horrible Xandros distro the eee shipped with.

      The keyboard is still too small though.

    10. Re:Ubuntu by njahnke · · Score: 1

      i also have a 1000. i have had two issues with easy peasy: 1) i cannot disable the trackpad click (which i accidentally activate constantly) without (as i found by googling) hacking a driver-specific config file; i haven't had time to check whether the trackpad is actually being controlled by this specific driver, so i can't yet report any success on this front, and 2) i can't get wpa_supplicant to sign on to my campus's wireless network, which is admittedly 802.11x with some proprietary crap on top. the odd thing is that os x has no problem with it. i'm getting a timeout when the eee tries to send credentials. again, haven't had the time to do more debugging. wireless works fine with my (much more standard-bearing) apple-branded airport router at home (wpa2, no 802.11x). other than that, it works good.

    11. Re:Ubuntu by buggerybox · · Score: 0

      > Brilliant advice. He didn't give any advice, he's asking for it. > Really, you are a model of reading comprehension He's writing a question, not reading or responding to a post. Seems it's you who's having trouble with comprehension.

    12. Re:Ubuntu by Logic+Worshiper · · Score: 1

      I used to use Stardock windowblinds before I switched to Linux, it does a nice job of jazzing up XP.

    13. Re:Ubuntu by giuda · · Score: 1

      I have an EeePC 1000H with 2 gigs of ram and XP. I bought it to make live DJsets (with Mixxx, if you are interested). Well, it runs great on XP, with just not so much latency. It's only slow when calculating the song's beats, but it normal since the Atom is not the fastest CPU...
      Then I tried Xubuntu with a custom EeePC kernel... well, i have to say that KDE4 is nicer than XP, BUT Mixxx (compiled on the machine, with optimizations enabled) is SLOWER. Latency is doubled, the graphics are slower etc..

      tl;dr: drivers in XP are A LOT better, EeePC is faster.

    14. Re:Ubuntu by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he actually likes the way Vista works, not just the way it looks. Do any of the Vista look-alike themes for XP give you, as just one example, Vista's improved Task Manager?

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    15. Re:Ubuntu by AndyboyH · · Score: 1

      I like the netbook remix, but I'm on a 701, so I guess it's better for those with smaller screen sizes?

      Either way, I'd also recommend easy peasy - it's really an excellent distro, and far better than the default install.

      I just hope they start rolling in some of the changes from intel's moblin work so the eee can boot quicker. That's my only annoyance with ubuntu so far...

      --
      Baka Drew
    16. Re:Ubuntu by Apollo13 · · Score: 1

      but don't forget to add the www.array.org/ubuntu repository for eeepc-specific additions

    17. Re:Ubuntu by onecheapgeek · · Score: 1

      My comment was at the idiot who suggested Ubuntu, after the submitter specifically shot down Ubuntu. So yes, he was giving advice, and his reading comprehension is terrible. I'm sorry I have to spell this out to you.

    18. Re:Ubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all one has to "look beyond what you see"[quote from Lion King], and that means not always taking for granted that Ubuntu is the right choice. (If you do, you might as well be called blinded-by-the-distro.)

    19. Re:Ubuntu by CommanderIsm · · Score: 1

      hear hear... the anonymous poster of the question likes vista but thinks xp is a load of crap - where as they both are crap - also somehow thinks ubuntu does not have the drivers - and so on three counts does not know what they are talking about.

  3. eeebuntu by IMarvinTPA · · Score: 4, Informative

    You may wish to try http://www.eeebuntu.org/ which is NOT the same as Ubuntu-eee.

    It has worked decently on my 1000HD.

    IMarv

    1. Re:eeebuntu by oodaloop · · Score: 2, Informative

      Seconded. I'm using it right now on my EEE 900HA. I'm using the Netbook remix, which I really like so far. It's the standard Ubuntu load, plus a netbook interface over the desktop. Looks cool too.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    2. Re:eeebuntu by lt.+slock · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'll second that. I've been using eeebuntu base on my 901 happily enough, battery life seems to be about 5 hours.

    3. Re:eeebuntu by RDanW · · Score: 1

      I ran the ubuntu-eee on my 900 for some time. Straight out of the box did not work for wireless or the sound. There was a patch called Nice-EEE or something along those lines that did a fairly good job of cleaning up the drivers and making everything work,but it was spotty. After a shutdown I would occasionally have to rerun the patch and after every update as well. I eventually switched over to eeeBuntu and it has worked flawlessly since.

    4. Re:eeebuntu by Neuroprophet · · Score: 1

      I'll third this. I'm using eeebuntu base on my 701. Works like a charm and still leaves some room on the tiny drive.

      Almost everything worked out of the box. Only thing I had to fix was the wireless on/off hotkey.

      Haven't tried the webcam but I usually use my eee offline on the train.

      Before switching to eeebuntu I tried easy peasy, stock ubuntu and eeeXubuntu. All had many issues and needed quite a bit of tinkering after install.

    5. Re:eeebuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awake from suspend doesn't work on my 901/eeebuntu base. X gets confused and tries to display on something other than the internal or connected external screen. (what, I have no idea)

      Killing X sometimes works, and will get me back to a gdm loging window, but then I've lost my session and it's easier to just shutdown instead of sleep.

    6. Re:eeebuntu by SoTerrified · · Score: 1

      When I finally grew tired of the stock Xandros that came pre-installed on my eeepc 900, I installed EEEbuntu (Netbook) and I was so impressed (wireless worked, sound worked) it's a keeper. Installation was almost effortless (certainly easier than installing Windows) and with Wine, I'm currently running all the Linux and Windows software I ever wanted on my laptop.

    7. Re:eeebuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm running Eeebuntu as well and am quite pleased with it.

    8. Re:eeebuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1. Using this on my EeeBox and its pretty sweet.

    9. Re:eeebuntu by theaceoffire · · Score: 5, Informative

      Like the others, I too support this version.

      Not only does it work well, but it remembers your Wifi settings and doesn't pester you, so that when you walk close enough to one setting you set up before it will auto connect...

      When I go from home to work, It swaps networks automatically.

      --
      I steal signatures. This one used to be yours.
    10. Re:eeebuntu by stevied · · Score: 1

      I'm currently trying to shoe-horn it onto my 2Gb Surf.. not entirely straightforward, as the only version that fits is Base, and that doesn't include any apps, but I can understand why the 2Gb versions might be a bit of a nuisance to support out of the box. It certainly looks like the best starting platform out of the many alternatives I've looked at.

    11. Re:eeebuntu by pmbasehore · · Score: 2, Informative

      I use eeebuntu as well on my EEE 1000. I'm normally not a big *buntu fan, but this has exceeded all of my expectations. It took a little bit of fiddling to get my hotkeys to work, but that would be true of any laptop on any distro.

      Works a darnsight better than that crap Xandros bastardization they OEM'ed it with!

      --
      $> man woman $> Segmentation fault. (Core dumped)
    12. Re:eeebuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      agreed, working on my 1000 right now, but I've been having some issues viewing sites that use flash player 10,any ideas?

    13. Re:eeebuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eeebuntu also gets my vote, I'm using the NetBookRemix version on my 1000 and its pretty awesome, everything works fresh out of the installation, they even have some handy ways to install from a USB flash drive if you don't happen to have a USB DVD drive handy I think.

    14. Re:eeebuntu by DanZ23 · · Score: 1

      As a Gentoo fanboy, I've been using a custom Gentoo install on my 900 since I got it last summer. Last night I burned eeebuntu to a dvd and ran it as a livecd. I'm now currently backing up my ~/ to install it. It's that good.

    15. Re:eeebuntu by jaaron · · Score: 2, Informative

      Another +1 for eeebuntu here. Has worked great.

      --
      Who said Freedom was Fair?
    16. Re:eeebuntu by Tetsujin · · Score: 4, Funny

      You may wish to try http://www.eeebuntu.org/ which is NOT the same as Ubuntu-eee.

      It has worked decently on my 1000HD.

      IMarv

      Ah... Not to be confused with The People's Front of Judea!

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    17. Re:eeebuntu by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 1

      Currently writing this reply from my eeebuntu-powered eee 701. It works great. And everything just plain works right out of the box. What more could you ask for?

      --
      The game.
    18. Re:eeebuntu by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      <AOL>
      Me too!
      </AOL>

      I'm running eeebuntu-nbr 2.0 on my 900 and I love it.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    19. Re:eeebuntu by jdbausch · · Score: 1

      I will also chime in for eeebuntu. I run it on a 701, and have played with ubuntu, xubuntu, xp, xandros (obviously), and some others as well. I think it is is the best I've tried for eee

    20. Re:eeebuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Writing this on eeebuntu right now. The best of the specialized distros for EEE. Use the Standard, leave the Netbook Remix alone, the clutter launcher SUCKS, it's essentially still beta quality and breaks hard with an external monitor.

      eeebuntu is ubuntu with a the array.org kernel, AWN as a dock, new art and a pared down application install. Tweaks included, make sure to run the EEEbuntu Config under applications/system tools to get your hotkeys working.

       

    21. Re:eeebuntu by ScuxxletButt · · Score: 1

      Thirded. I just bought a EeePC 901A with the dinky 4GB SSHD and I couldn't be happier. I'm using the Base version. I still have a little over 25% free space after a few multimedia tools and OpenOffice installed. Runs with my Verizon USB EVDO connection, too.

    22. Re:eeebuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, should we order from "Alfredo's Pizza Cafe" or "Pizza by Alfredo"?

    23. Re:eeebuntu by galaxia26 · · Score: 1

      I'm going to also throw my lot towards eeebuntu. It runs great out of the box, netbook remix interface is fantastic, draws on the stock Ubuntu repos so you can use any software from Ubuntu. It's really the only distro for the eee that "Just Works"

    24. Re:eeebuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not that anyone cares, but.. another happy eeebuntu user here ;)

    25. Re:eeebuntu by bball99 · · Score: 1

      eeebuntu is quite good on my 900 and 1000 - no problems with suspend, desktop easily customized (i used eeebuntu Standard 2.0)...

      i get a 55-second boot time via SDHC from my 16gb Adata card - and i'll keep the OEM Xandros for giggles (for now)...

      but with a replaceable hard drive at less than US$25, who's complaining?

    26. Re:eeebuntu by i+love+colleen · · Score: 1

      The eeebuntu site doesn't seem to have any documentation, aside from a daunting forum. What does it include that Easy Peasy doesn't?

    27. Re:eeebuntu by thewebdude · · Score: 1

      Of the several distros I've tried, Eeebuntu wins, hands down. Installation, configuration, ease of use, driver support -- all built-in. Available in two fresh flavors, for a full or reduced desktop. http://www.eeebuntu.org/

    28. Re:eeebuntu by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      eeeBuntu works perfectly on my 900HA. worked perfectly with my Celery 900 too.

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    29. Re:eeebuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thirded. I found Ubuntu-eee to fail miserably on an eeepc 901, but eeebuntu has been absolutely pain free.

      The only two issues I had were:

      • flashplugin-nonfree had to be re-installed because it wasn't properly installed after system install. I don't know why. The re-install was simple though, the package can be easily found in synaptic.
      • The sound was very quiet for some reason. It took awhile to find a work around (change audio processor from auto to pulseaudio) but I did eventually find it.
    30. Re:eeebuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks better, it works better, it includes some useful configuration tools.

      As for documentation, after a lot of canvasing of their users, the Eeebuntu guys are going to release an add-on to the website with wiki/FAQ and tutorial stuff.

  4. Which distro? Debian. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    1. Re:Which distro? Debian. by stevey · · Score: 5, Informative

      Seconded.

      I've been running Debian's Lenny release upon my Eee PC for the past few months. Everything works, from the power buttons, sound, video, camera, wireless.

      The only instructions I used were those on the wiki you link to.

      Still this question is going to receive the obvious replies - everybody will suggest the distribution they know and like the best (the two are often the same).

      I'd say "try a few, choose your favourite", but I suspect the better thing to do would just be to pick what you're using elsewhere, or whatever local people are using. Then if you have problems you'll have people to ask.

    2. Re:Which distro? Debian. by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Thirded/fourthed/whatever.

      Been running lenny on my 901 for months now. Works great.

      That wiki has enough info to get going fast. Only issue with mine was that I had to build the wireless driver manually. Which is not as scary as it sounds, apt-get install the source, m-a it and a-i the result. All given in plain English in that wiki.

      Debian ++

      (not that your favourite linux is any less valid, dear reader, I just like this one.)

    3. Re:Which distro? Debian. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, too am running Lenny on my 701. No issues except that I had better luck with the ath5k drivers than with madwifi. Plus, my entire distro with oofice, full development environment, fluxbox, wine, and the usual Java/Flash nonsense for Firefox nets in at just under 1.7Gig.

      I LIKE running stuff from the command-line...which may not be what the OP is looking for.

    4. Re:Which distro? Debian. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another vote for Debian Lenny ... but to get it on to the EEEPC in the first place, I'd recommend using MEPIS 8.0.

      Wireless works out of the box, no need to compile anything, xorg/screen is set up automatically (choose the 800x600 option for the initial video mode), stable, reliable, well adapted for the screen size, nothing extra needed to be installed after the initial install from the MEPIS liveCD.

    5. Re:Which distro? Debian. by Deb-fanboy · · Score: 1
      I am also using the Debian version. I tried a few of the others, mostly ubuntu derivatives, but IMHO the Debian version hits the mark.

      The Xandros however is a pig. It strikes me that some of the Linuxes pre-installed on netbooks are hard to love

    6. Re:Which distro? Debian. by jetxee · · Score: 1

      Happily running Debian eeePC flavour on 901 for three months. Satisfied.

      What's not working out of the box:

      * Intel HDA Audio plays audio well, but mic is not working right (requires newer ALSA or 2.6.28 kernel, not yet in repository)
      * Bluetooth can be enabled only in the BIOS (requires reboot)
      * ACPI scripts switch WiFi off correctly, but fail to switch it on correctly if the laptop was put into sleep with WiFi turned off (a workaround: always enable WiFi before putting it into sleep mode, or reboot to restore it)
      * mouse driver is used instead of Elantech touchpad driver (requires kernel 2.6.28), so syndaemon cannot be used, multitouch is not working.

      Most of this can be solved with a newer kernel, and everything has workarounds.

  5. Fedora by bibdectrl · · Score: 1

    Works out-of-the-box on my 701eeepc

    1. Re:Fedora by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love fedora on my 901. Just create a live USB key and off you go.

    2. Re:Fedora by walshy007 · · Score: 1

      Same with my 1000H eeepc, fedora's more of a developers setup than users, typically though.

  6. Xubuntu by jfbilodeau · · Score: 2, Informative

    For what it's worth, I've been running Xubuntu on my Eee ever since I got it. 100% happy with it, and used it to develop a little control panel for my Eee PC using Anjuta.

    http://chronogears.com/2008/04/control-panel-for-eee-pc.html

    J-F

    --
    Goodbye Slashdot. You've changed.
    1. Re:Xubuntu by Fungii · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm the same, I've got Xubuntu and compiz running and it's perfect, get some minimal window decorations and you're sorted.

      Just do a standard installation, then head over to http://www.array.org/ and follow the instructions to install the kernel which will get your wireless and hotkeys working.

      http://www.eeeuser.com/ is an excellent forum if you have any more questions. There are a few threads there that have step by step guides to installing and configuring Xubuntu, but there really isn't much to it beyond getting a custom kernel.

    2. Re:Xubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me three! But you guys forgot to mention eeepc-config and eee-control, two packages for enabling speacial hotkeys and such. Choose one of them, a simple apt-get will do to try them out.

      To sum it up: Xubuntu with kernel from array.org and eeepc-config or eee-control. It works great on my 901. The only thing that took some "effort" (googling, apt-get'ing and editing some config files) was getting it to use my phone as a bluetooth modem.

      Personally, I didn't like Eeebuntu or Ubuntu Eee (now Easy Peasy(!))

    3. Re:Xubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Xubuntu + adams's kernel is quite nice if one uses the EEE as a Desktop replacement (which I do). The only thing that does not work is skype, for whatever reason.

      Where Skype does work (almost - WiFi driver needed), and which is awesomely small, fast and just plain useful is Puppy Linux (in the NOP-Version, to be found on the forums for Puppy). ~100 MB install, with all the things needed for mobile use (editors, browser).

      If I would not use the EEE as a desktop replacement, I would not install Xubuntu, but Puppy.

      I also tried Mandriva, which works pretty well (I messed it up by my own stupidity, and when went to Xubuntu out of curiousity).
      I think about trying Debian Lenny next - once I have time and the urge to tinker again, I probably will.

    4. Re:Xubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 for eeeuser.com great community for these things

      I actually like the Default Xandros distro myself.
      but the unionfs is starting to p me off

    5. Re:Xubuntu by daver00 · · Score: 1

      Another happy eee owner here (901, love it) with Xubuntu and adams kernel from array.org. This is seriously the easiest and most well functioning linux install I've ever experienced. With the custom kernel more or less everything just worked straight away.

      The only thing is to get the gsynaptics trackpad drivers going, the multitouch is top notch once they are working properly.

    6. Re:Xubuntu by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      I'm the same, I've got Xubuntu and compiz running and it's perfect, get some minimal window decorations and you're sorted.

      That strikes me as an odd combination. I thought always thought XFCE and Compiz were aimed at totally different sets of people. Xfce is a desktop environment for people who want something light and fast, whereas Compiz is a window manager for people who are like pretty visual effects and are willing to trade some performance. Is Compiz faster and/or more efficient than Xfwm, or do you just happen to prefer Xfce for reasons other than efficiency?

      I find Gnome runs fine on my Eee 1000 (running stock Ubuntu with the array.org kernel), except the panel doesn't always hide when it should.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  7. Easy Peasy by EverStoned · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:Easy Peasy by ericrost · · Score: 1

      I do have to say, that website looks like ass. I probably wouldn't download something that was linked off of something that looked that thrown together and loads that damned slowly. I use Ubuntu Netbook Remix and like it on my Dell Mini 9.. I don't know what Easy Peasy looks like, contains, etc, and now their server has fallen over....

    2. Re:Easy Peasy by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      I tried Easy Peasy's predecessor, Ubuntu-eee, and while it mostly worked, I wanted 3 more things.

      Wireless. I could not get wireless to work. It would see the wireless networks, but would not connect.

      Video + audio capture. The video camera capture software, Cheese, was difficult. It would capture some video, and then show the user nothing, no hint on how to save it. Have to exit Cheese and rerun it, then you will see the captured video clip. There doesn't seem to be any way to simultaneously capture audio and video. Maybe I'm asking too much of a mere netbook?

      Faster boot + login times. Everyone fudges on boot times by declaring that the computer is booted up before it is really ready to use. It takes an additional 10 seconds or so for the GUI environment to initialize and automatic login to finish. And that's without restoring any saved apps.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    3. Re:Easy Peasy by seebs · · Score: 1

      It ain't perfect, and it took a couple of tweaks to get it running the way I wanted it, but...

      I have to say it's pretty good. Just Works, repos have plenty of usable software. I can browse the web, read PDFs, and (with only a bit of manual compiling to get current versions) have a full local Ruby on Rails install.

      I am planning to stick with this for the forseeable future.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    4. Re:Easy Peasy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seconded. Easy Peasy FTW!!! Runs great on my AA1. The netbook remix is a very intuitive and straightforward interface. Install KDE on top of it and get the great K apps plus still have netbook remix. Wireless works with fresh install no mucking around.

    5. Re:Easy Peasy by ender- · · Score: 1

      Faster boot + login times. Everyone fudges on boot times by declaring that the computer is booted up before it is really ready to use. It takes an additional 10 seconds or so for the GUI environment to initialize and automatic login to finish. And that's without restoring any saved apps.

      I time my boot times from the moment I hit the power button until I have displayed www.google.com in a web browser.

      Using a bare install of Debian Lenny, installing only what I needed I was able to boot into WindowMaker [or XFCE] [via GDM] and load IceWeasel to a google home page in 48 seconds [including time to type in username/passwd].

      I used to prefer Xubuntu for notebook/desktop usage, but now it runs so much cruft in the background it takes much longer to boot [1:15ish] and seems slower. Thus I've gone back to Debian.

    6. Re:Easy Peasy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It really is.

      Careful here. I've had trouble getting good wireless Internet access with easy peasy, even when the wireless connection is said to be excellent.

    7. Re:Easy Peasy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy Peasy is a DROP IN ubuntu. It just works. Their web site sucks. Their wiki is undeveloped, the software "just works."

      Really really good.

    8. Re:Easy Peasy by Skuldo · · Score: 1

      Don't let that put you off, it works well. They do like to use that stupid green and yellow lemon logo everywhere though (badly traced transparent PNG with white jagged borders on brown ubuntu wallpaper ftw).

    9. Re:Easy Peasy by rob1980 · · Score: 1

      Websites aren't their strong suit. Their wiki is much better in terms of basic info on the distro, and for as slow as their website is, you can get the distro much quicker via bit torrent.

    10. Re:Easy Peasy by bioglaze · · Score: 1

      I start timing my bootup when I hit the power button and I stop timing when wireless authenticates with the router. Currently my bootup time is 31 s. I'm using Eee PC 701 and Xubuntu 8.10 with custom kernel from kernel.org. I hope to see better bootup time with Xubuntu 9.04 and ext4.

      --
      Who is John Galt?
    11. Re:Easy Peasy by mollymoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bootup time is a concern for the Celeron based Eees because sleep sucks so much power, but for anything else (including the Atom-based Eees) I just can't see any need to boot regularly enough for 30 seconds to matter. Just use sleep. I've never heard of a distribution which can boot to any desktop on any machine faster than Ubuntu wakes from sleep on my Eee (6 seconds, which feels glacial if your last laptop was a Mac).

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    12. Re:Easy Peasy by ncostigan · · Score: 1

      + 1 for easy peasy.

      seemless wireless including 3g

    13. Re:Easy Peasy by rivetrider · · Score: 1

      Myself very happy with my EasyPeasy eeePC 1000 find it surprising that some people have had trouble with EasyPeasy (other than with the name). I think I installed it when it had only been available as EasyPeasy for about 2 weeks and I have had no trouble other than taking a while to get the BT mouse going right. (the advice here helped with that http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-508847.html) Perhaps wiping the HD first, instead of just doing the upgrade, does not help. If you just follow the directions and do it the easy(peasy) way, maybe you're OK.

    14. Re:Easy Peasy by risinganger · · Score: 1

      Be fair! after all, the entire site is probably running off a copy of Easy Peasy on a EEEPC 701...

  8. You're best bet by Dishwasha · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you're struggling to use Windows XP on a daily basis, perhaps you should try something like this laptop. I'm certain you will find yourself struggling just as much and see just as much bloat with any kind of GNU/Linux distribution, so this can really cut down on the learning curve and usability issues.

    1. Re:You're best bet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      this laptop [amazon.com]

      Pfft, I've installed BSD on one of those. It was easier than the toaster, as this at least has a keyboard.

      I was stumped by the dead badger though, but it is rumoured to be possible.

      I hear once you get BSD running on a badger you really have earned your stripes.

    2. Re:You're best bet by the_brobdingnagian · · Score: 1

      I run OpenBSD on my Eee PC 1000H and it runs fine. Except for the webcam, all hardware works out of the box.

    3. Re:You're best bet by nerdman978 · · Score: 1

      very hilarious

    4. Re:You're best bet by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "If you're struggling to use Windows XP on a daily basis, perhaps you should try something like this laptop."

      At last, a computer for First Lieutenants!
      Once these are issued they won't have to fight the 2LT's for the Etch-A-Sketch,

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    5. Re:You're best bet by dvhh · · Score: 1

      still too complicated. maybe a more simple one should do the trick.

    6. Re:You're best bet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're best bet

      Don't call me Best Bet.

    7. Re:You're best bet by rdado · · Score: 1

      nice, nco's all around the world are applauding

  9. Windows 7 by heffrey · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you like vista why not stick windows 7 on it?

    1. Re:Windows 7 by djveer · · Score: 1

      Although i'm sure that might be good for him, Windows 7 is still only beta and the beta expires in August.

    2. Re:Windows 7 by RonnyJ · · Score: 1

      Not sure why this is modded offtopic.

      If you like Vista, Windows 7 is less resource hungry, and you can try out the beta and then the Release Candidate at least until July, the RC will probably extend that limit until later in the year.

    3. Re:Windows 7 by wicka · · Score: 3, Informative

      First off, I submitted this, my bad on forgetting to put in a name. The reason I can't use 7 is because the 1000HD graphics chipset doesn't support Aero, and using Vista/7 without Aero basically renders the OS useless (especially in the case of 7, where the vast majority of the new GUI features require Aero). I was trying to be concise in the submission so I didn't want to get off in a tangent about how pissed I am that Intel refuses to write WDDM drivers for the GMA 900.

    4. Re:Windows 7 by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      It's still far less buggy than vista and there is already a "fix" for the beta timeout in august. just go to your vaforite torrent site to get it.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:Windows 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's good advice. To be clear, though, the beta runs until August 1, so he could use Windows 7 through the end of July.

    6. Re:Windows 7 by RonnyJ · · Score: 1

      If you run 'winver', the Windows 7 beta reports an expiry date of 1st July.

    7. Re:Windows 7 by BuckDefiant · · Score: 1

      Don't Worry, Be Happy!
      Microsoft tailors Windows 7 for netbooks
      Tue Feb 24, 2009 2:25pm EST
      According to Ballmer, M$ is supposedly focused on netbooks: "Microsoft, which a month ago blamed netbooks for weaker-than-expected quarterly profits, said it is planning to ship a low-end version of Windows 7 for netbooks, and make it easy for users to upgrade to more expensive editions." http://www.reuters.com/article/managementIssues/idUSN2439838920090224

    8. Re:Windows 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I watched a YouTube on Windows 7 that looks like it works great on the 3ePC.
      http://jkkmobile.blogspot.com/2009/01/windows-7-beta-on-mobile-computers.html

    9. Re:Windows 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...the 1000HD graphics chipset doesn't support Aero, and using Vista/7 without Aero basically renders the OS useless...

      well, maybe i am wrong. But without proper driver support you will get a cut down version of Aero without the transparencies, flipping taskmanger and such, but you will still see the new decorations and not the Pre-XP (Win2000) ones which I really find quite unworkable in Vista/Win7.

    10. Re:Windows 7 by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      For slashdot community, everyone using Windows is either forced to use it or a plain idiot.

      So, one should be saved in both cases. If you suggest Windows 7 over XP (which I agree), you are not saving him so as with new slashdot fashion, you were ''undugg'' by abuse of moderation.

      Besides jokes, I did a mad test which surprised even MS employees on IRC. I installed Win 7 under emulated Intel hardware (On G5) with no MMX or SSE. Besides the ''no GPU'' issue, it performed faster than XP on same PC (!) with 512MB RAM. I guess Windows 7 will be a hit on netbooks.

      For me? I would use the real netbook with optimized OS designed for it. Nokia E90 (of 9000 series) or N97. Symbian. It is now open source too. With uptimes of 4-5 weeks with zero memory/cpu leaks on my old Nokia 9300, I wouldn't think a second.

    11. Re:Windows 7 by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      especially in the case of 7, where the vast majority of the new GUI features require Aero

      Such as? I haven't seen any noticeable differences in the "feel" of Win7 (or Vista, for that matter) in Windows Classic mode, with Aero disabled - all the UI features (and by "features" I don't mean that bling bling stuff) are still there. The new Win7 taskbar is fully functional in Classic, for example.

  10. What driver issues? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2, Informative

    What about the Eee 1000HA had hardware driver support issues?

    The Intel Atom restricts the platform enough that there's very little hardware variance between units. WiFi and card readers are about the only thing that varies. I know the Atheros WiFi chipset used in the Aspire One series has some issues with "out of the box" Ubuntu support, but if you connect once via wired Ethernet you can apt-get a package that includes drivers that work. See the ath5k entry in the release notes - http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/810

    The only hardware issues I've had with my Acer Aspire One and vanilla Ubuntu were:
    1) The above wifi issue
    2) Kubuntu's initial Bluetooth issues, this was resolved in the latest round of KDE updates. (This was with a third-party BT dongle, and KDE Bluetooth support was entirely broken on all systems with recent kernels.)
    3) Um... I think that's it?

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:What driver issues? by n0dna · · Score: 1

      It's been my experience that Atheros chipsets have "some issues" (like they don't ever work) "out of the box" on the *.10 releases of Ubuntu. I thought I read somewhere that the *.10 are *secretly experimental* releases. That's certainly been my experience. Maybe he should try 8.04.

    2. Re:What driver issues? by kextyn · · Score: 1

      I recently got the wife a 900HA which has the Atheros wireless card. I tried eeeBuntu and Easy Peasy and was able to connect to the wireless. I know there were some scripts that came on one of them (Easy Peasy?) to fix hardware issues and I may have ran these before trying the wireless.

    3. Re:What driver issues? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He has the 1000HD. That model is NOT Atom based and also varies widely between the Windows and Linux versions in terms of hardware configuration.

    4. Re:What driver issues? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      It's been my experience that Atheros chipsets have "some issues" (like they don't ever work) "out of the box" on the *.10 releases of Ubuntu. I thought I read somewhere that the *.10 are *secretly experimental* releases. That's certainly been my experience.

      Well, Ubuntu does long time support (LTS) releases once every two years and inbetween releases every 6 months. For the LTS releases they're naturally fairly conservative preferring tested and true solutions, so that when the immidiately following release comes around there's a rather large set of changes. And if there's any place in that two year cycle they prefer to introduce new technology it's then as they have two more releases before the next LTS and a fairly recent supported LTS they can ask people to stay on if they experience problems. But "*.10" does not make sense, the last LTS was 8.04 and the next will be 10.4, so 8.10 is immidiately after a LTS while 9.10 will be immidiately before and probably very stable.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  11. eeebuntu on 900 by Meneth · · Score: 1

    I run eeebuntu on an Eee PC 900. Most of it is ok, though I had to do a bunch of command-line and config-file magic to make wifi and the touchpad work.

    Wifi is now stable, but the touchpad forgets its settings every time I log out, so I have to reset it all the time. Rather annoying.

    1. Re:eeebuntu on 900 by Apotekaren · · Score: 1

      The newest iteration, Eeebuntu 2.0 works out of the box, and you only need to run a configuration application(to cater the different models of the EeePC, 700/900/100) once, and then it's all fine. I'm running Eeebuntu 2.0 Standard after trying XandrOS, Ubuntu, Ubuntu Eee, OS X and Eeebuntu 1.0.

      --
      She: Hey, are you a traitor? Me: No, I'm atheist.
    2. Re:eeebuntu on 900 by Meneth · · Score: 1

      I am running Eeebuntu 2.0. Had to change the touchpad controller because the standard one couldn't disable tapping.

  12. ext4 is worth the wait? by revjtanton · · Score: 1
    I don't own a netbook (yet...I'm getting one soon though!) but I've been looking into this a lot myself.

    I would say that at the moment there isn't an OS out there that lends itself to the particular brand of configuration required for the netbooks, but if you wait just a bit longer it'll be worth the wait.

    Aside from Windows 7's support for netbooks, the ext4 file system to be used with "Jaunty" will help with all the things you've complained about with Ubuntu as well as helping with boot time.

    "As computers become faster in general and specifically Linux becomes used more for mission critical applications, the granularity of second-based timestamps becomes insufficient. To solve this, ext4 will have timestamps measured in nanoseconds. This feature is currently implemented in 2.6.23. In addition, 2 bits of the expanded timestamp field are added to the most significant bits of the seconds field of the timestamps to defer the year 2038 problem for an additional 500 years.

    Support for date-created timestamps was added in ext4. However, as Theodore Ts'o points out, while adding an extra creation date field in the inode is easy (thus technically enabling support for date-created timestamps in ext4), modifying or adding the necessary system calls, like stat() (which would probably require a new version), and the various libraries that depend on them (like glibc) is not trivial and would require the coordination of many different projects[8]. So even if ext4 developers implement initial support for creation-date timestamps, this feature will not be available to user programs for now."

    1. Re:ext4 is worth the wait? by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      I would say that at the moment there isn't an OS out there that lends itself to the particular brand of configuration required for the netbooks, but if you wait just a bit longer it'll be worth the wait.

      What configuration? I use Ubuntu on an Eee 1000 (a typical Atom-based netbook with an SSD and 1024x600 display). The sum total of "configuration required for netbooks" I carried out was to use one panel instead of two, set the panel to auto-hide, use the deadline scheduler rather CFQ and reduce the kernel's tendency to use swap (which I'd also do on any desktop Linux machine). I have felt no need for any further tweaking.

      I have no idea why you think nanosecond timestamp resolution matters for netbooks.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    2. Re:ext4 is worth the wait? by revjtanton · · Score: 1

      Like I said: I don't own a netbook. If you are aware of a config that works well then let us all know (since that seems to be the point of this thread)

      I did copy and paste without reading too much of what I as submitting, for that I do apologize. The point I was driving at was that ext4 will boot faster which should allow for a better netbook experience. Why? Because you can simply shut down the box when not in use.

      My wife's Toshiba notebook takes 31 seconds to "wake up" when put in standby mode...so 21 seconds from a off-state to rock n' roll is pretty awesome! It'll help battery time among other things. I'm sorry I copied the wrong portion of the Wikipedia entry, I should've just linked to the site that I have in this post. My bad.

    3. Re:ext4 is worth the wait? by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      I think I posted a comment further up, but I run an Eee 1000 running vanilla Ubuntu with the minor tweaks detailed above and a kernel from array.org to make the WiFi and hotkeys work properly. My Eee 1000 wakes from sleep in 6 seconds, WiFi takes a further 15 seconds or so to reconnect. Linux has never been super-snappy resuming from sleep, but 31 seconds sounds really bad, I can see why you'd care about fast booting with performance if sleep is that slow.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    4. Re:ext4 is worth the wait? by revjtanton · · Score: 1

      6 seconds! That's like a dream for me! My wife's notebook is kinda old, and it runs XP, and in fact isn't capable of running any linux build that I've tried. Waking from sleep is 31 seconds...I haven't been able to keep time from boot since I usually fall asleep waiting for it to finish!

      I'm thinking about getting the eee 900 in the next two weeks, so this discussion was particularly useful to me :) Thanks for your input and insight, I feel even more confident in my purchase (I was skeptical mostly because I don't see an exact need for a netbook considering Android's functionality and the promise of the Pre's; but if the netbook can work the way you and others have described I see the value!).

  13. eeebuntu by iTowelie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So far I have tried the following operating systems in this order:

    vLited Vista Home
    Ubuntu eee
    eeebuntu Standard
    nLited XP
    eeebuntu NetBookRemix.

    Just last night I switched back from XP to eeebuntu 2.0 NBR. Why? Well, it just works beautifully OOTB with my 701SD and the GUI works well with the 7" screen. All I had to do was edit my fstab to automatically mount my Airdisk and media shares on my Vista box and that was that. I use it to browse the web, edit/view spreadsheets and to remote into some of my home computers. ZSNES is also a crucial download.

    I honestly don't really notice the battery drain. If I want to compute for 2+ hours, I will use my desktop to avoid sore wrists by using the 701SD's small keyboard.

  14. Wait by TheSpoom · · Score: 4, Funny

    You like Vista, but dislike XP?

    What's it like in your parallel universe? Can I visit?

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
    1. Re:Wait by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

      You like Vista, but dislike XP?

      If I was the target audience for Vista I'd stay anonymous, too.

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    2. Re:Wait by MrZaius · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's like the event logs suddenly became human readable, the shell started to suck less, and a KDE-like start menu started letting me just type in what I want without navigating the typical Windows Start Menu hell. It's harder than you might think to go back to XP after a substantial period of time on an optimized Vista install.

      Not that there's any way at all that I'll defend its astoundingly slow file transfers and deletion speeds, after a service-pack and years of patches. Still, it works well enough in-game and does have some strong points from an administrator's perspective, given modern hardware and well-written drivers. (Albeit not well enough to get me to use it more than 20% of the time.)

    3. Re:Wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, basically he's saying "I have these weird tastes now recommend something for me". I don't see how anyone can answer his question.

    4. Re:Wait by greg_barton · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What's it like in your parallel universe?

      In his universe Spock has no beard.

      How fucked up is that?

    5. Re:Wait by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      A parallel universe where rational people prefer Vista to XP... is that the same parallel universe where supermodels prefer to date computer nerds rather than pop stars?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    6. Re:Wait by KibibyteBrain · · Score: 1

      I think he means to say, he likes Vista so he isn't just a Windows hater, but even XP is too sluggish for his needs on the netbook.

    7. Re:Wait by LordEd · · Score: 5, Funny

      In his universe, objects in Soviet Russia don't actually do anything to you.

      Old people and young people use things in North Korea.

      Scientists have solved the ??? and have profited.

      The anti-spam solution checklist has (x) That's a great idea. You solved it!

    8. Re:Wait by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      Re:Wait (Score:5, Insightful)

      Apparently in this universe my comment is +5 insightful.

      How fucked up is that?

    9. Re:Wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shoot. In this universe, Spock says screw the Vulcan neck pinch and instead can cut your head open with his finger.

  15. EeePC -- OS and potential by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

    I would use Ubuntu on EeePC as it can REALLY be trimmed down, well, at least in theory.

    Here's my dream OS configuration for EeePC.

    (a) Enough computing power to do things efficiently.
    (b) Operate in two modes seamlessly:
            (1) Portable "netbook" mode.
            (2) Tethered mode, where you attach a USB keyboard and disk and a monitor, and it works like a full fledged desktop. Correctly detects the USB drive and replaces /usr or /usr/local with a partition on the USB drive so that it includes "all" the programs you want.

  16. I'm sorry to the XP-hater by commodore64_love · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't take seriously someone who claims he loves Vista AND considers XP to be crap.

    I can kinda, sorta understood someone liking Vista's pretty new interface, but I've been using XP for 7 years now, and it's far from being crap. It's the most stable OS I've ever used, second only to the Mac OS. Vista on the other hand..... I can't even get it to play video on cnn.com or foxnews.com. It's not the worst OS I've ever used (Windows 3 was worse), but it's still pretty sad.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    1. Re:I'm sorry to the XP-hater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to go, friend. Windows 3 wasn't an OS, it was a multitasking window manager. DOS was the OS.

    2. Re:I'm sorry to the XP-hater by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can't take seriously someone who claims he loves Vista AND considers XP to be crap.

      I can kinda, sorta understood someone liking Vista's pretty new interface, but I've been using XP for 7 years now, and it's far from being crap. It's the most stable OS I've ever used, second only to the Mac OS. Vista on the other hand..... I can't even get it to play video on cnn.com or foxnews.com. It's not the worst OS I've ever used (Windows 3 was worse), but it's still pretty sad.

      The OP certainly has weird taste in somehow hating XP but liking Vista. They're not that different. XP is stable, and Vista is more stable. Vista is faster for most daily tasks (remember that our /. story showing 7 faster than XP in something like 19 of 22 tasks also showed Vista faster than XP in most tasks). Vista is slower for disk manipulation, which is baffling. They're equivalent for gaming - Vista is no longer any slower, but DX10 is still useless. Vista doesn't slow down over time like XP did, though this was never a problem for knowledgeable users anyway.

      There's no difference between the two in playing videos from cnn or that other place. The least computer literate people I know, people who can't understand what a pixel is, what a network connection is, or that there's a difference between a "computer" and "software" can do that with absolutely no problem.

      Your sig is stupid, btw.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    3. Re:I'm sorry to the XP-hater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...It's the most stable OS I've ever used, second only to the Mac OS....

      That's a new definition of "most" for me; learn something new (or wrong) on Slashdot every day, it seems.

    4. Re:I'm sorry to the XP-hater by fava · · Score: 1

      I can't take seriously someone who claims he loves Vista AND considers XP to be crap.

      Lets be realistic here. Solitare on vista is much prettier that XP. For some people that the only thing the computer is being used for, therefore vista has to be better.

    5. Re:I'm sorry to the XP-hater by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It's the most stable OS I've ever used, second only to the Mac OS.

      I can't take someone seriously who thinks that Mac OS is more stable than Windows XP.

      I sat at a Dual G5 and a Core Duo-based Windows XP system for over a year and used both extensively. I put the XP machine through much more pain and it locked up much less frequently. I was running adobe Creative Suite on both, plus Crystal Reports on the PC (and then I'd take it home and play games on it.)

      But then, maybe it's just what I was running? To which I must add that I touched Vista once, found it slow, and rejected it, but then, I was running Internet Explorer. But seriously, OSX more stable? Maybe it's stable on intel hardware? Er, my friend's experiences with his MBP (and he is not stressing it) suggest otherwise. Crap.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:I'm sorry to the XP-hater by poached · · Score: 1

      Your sig is just disturbing.

    7. Re:I'm sorry to the XP-hater by nicklott · · Score: 0

      heh, that's funny, 7 years ago Windows 98 was the best operating system that anyone had ever used and XP was the unstable new PoS that no-one was ever going to use and was going to be Microsoft's death knell. How times change...

    8. Re:I'm sorry to the XP-hater by meiao · · Score: 1

      I've been using XP for 7 years now, and it's far from being crap. It's the most stable OS I've ever used...

      So you never used anything besides XP and Mac OS then.

    9. Re:I'm sorry to the XP-hater by j0se_p0inter0 · · Score: 1

      I have an MSI Wind, which is pretty similar (if not the same) spec as the eeePC. Windows XP runs on mine flawlessly. Nice and quick, rock solid, and I'm averaging about 5 hours battery life depending on what I'm doing. I may eventually put Win 7 on it, but I'm taking an "if it ain't broke don't fix it" stance in that regard. Unless the poster is exaggerating, I doubt XP is running as terrible as he says it is...UNLESS Asus put some bloatware or just plain bad drivers on it by default. And he doesn't even mention exactly what XP is failing at, other than it's "a giant piece of crap" and "terrible". I love Linux as much as anyone else here, but XP is more than capable of satisfactorily running a freakin' netbook.

    10. Re:I'm sorry to the XP-hater by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      To be honest, in the early days of XP, it was a lot less stable. 3 service packs later, most of the problems are ironed out, and hardware manufacturers have improved their XP drivers. I can't remember anyone ever complaining that XP was less stable than 98, though.

      Also, when XP was released, it was much slower on the hardware of the day than 98 was. I don't think I was reading /. 7 years ago, but based on comments I'm still seeing, I'm guessing the complaints about XP were that it was more bloated than Windows 2000, they moved everything around again, and the damn Fisher-Price interface with the default Teletubby wallpaper.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    11. Re:I'm sorry to the XP-hater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vista in the same sentence as fast? with no "not" what?

    12. Re:I'm sorry to the XP-hater by schevans · · Score: 1

      Dude, try installing the right codecs

    13. Re:I'm sorry to the XP-hater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fair enough, but I can't take seriously someone who considers any recent Mac OS to be the most stable OS they've used, when on our top-end work Macs I have to hard reset at least once a day, Illustrator and Photoshop crash twice or thrice and can't run successfully concurrently, and multitasking is all but impossible.

      Bottom line is, something different works for everyone. I've personally had no real trouble with Vista, other than I hate its obnoxiously pretty, shiny interface.

    14. Re:I'm sorry to the XP-hater by savethelecture · · Score: 1

      Windows 3 was awsm! Stop attacking granfathers. Have you no respect for age? It gave you SOLITAIRE for free man! *sniff* (and I wonder if it would work on the eee -*evil smile*)

      --
      -Neurosis should be taken out in sex instead of politics and IT.
  17. Dedicated distro by DSmith1974 · · Score: 1

    I don't know how transferable it is, but I purchased an Asus Aspire ONE for my better half at xmas and it came with a Linpus Distro which is a Netbook OS based on Fedora 8. Out of the bag it's a little locked down but after a few minutes of searching you can unlock the desktop and get an XFCE window manager and package-installer. Support for drivers is great - but then you'd expect that since it was the original OS that came with the Netbook.

    --
    It is not immoral to create the human species - with or without ceremony, Samuel Clemens.
  18. Ubuntu 8.10 + Netbook Remix by GweeDo · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have a Dell Mini 9 that I run stock Ubuntu 8.10 + the Netbook Remix interface on and love it. There is a good 3-4GB left on the 8GB SSD even with OpenOffice 3 and a few other bigger apps.

  19. Ubuntu Netbook Remix by ericrost · · Score: 1

    All the drivers for netbook hardware out of the box, two choices for the interface, and runs pretty darned will in 512 MB of memory.

    I have it running on a Dell Mini 9 which is fairly similar to the eee.

    https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UNR

    1. Re:Ubuntu Netbook Remix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, Netbook Remix is the way to go on these eee's.

  20. Re:I'm sorry to the reality-hater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    But I can't take seriously someone who wants to watch videos on foxnews.com.

  21. I've tried a few, I recommend Ubuntu Netbook Remix by agent0range_ · · Score: 0, Troll

    I use the ubuntu netbook remix. I have tried Xandros (default), eeeXubuntu (worked pretty well), and gentoo (pain in the ass to set up, but that's what gentoo is all about).

    I recommend trying the netbook remix of Ubuntu. It's the one I have kept using the longest because I like the interface and it works well with the low resolution (I have an eee 701).

    http://wiki.eeeuser.com/ubuntu_netbook_remix

  22. OpenSuSE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Hi!
    I was considering buying one and putting OpenSuSE on it. There's a walkthrough on the OpenSuSE website:
    http://en.opensuse.org/OpenSUSE_on_the_EeePC

    Good Luck!

    (Anonymous Coward) ;-)

  23. Samsung NC10 + Ubuntu + WinXP + MacOSX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Im running Ubuntu 8.10 on my Samsung NC10, and aside from a bit of command line stuff to get the Atheros WiFi working correctly, and most of the FN combinations not working (there are hacks and workarounds, but im lazy) i think its more than useable. Though i triple boot WindowsXP, Ubuntu and MacOSX 10.5.6, and aside from a few niggles in Ubuntu and MacOS the little Samsung works wonders.

  24. Go to the source Luke, erm, whatever your name is. by Stumbles · · Score: 1

    Well if you feel like compiling from source, a guy here; http://forums.lunar-linux.org/viewtopic.php?t=535 put Lunar-Linux on his with minimal issues.

    --
    My karma is not a Chameleon.
  25. Head to the forum at www.eeeuser.com by ed · · Score: 1

    At present my 701 uses eeeXubuntu. Which is fine save for WPA2 which I am having soem problems with, but you should get better quality adive there than from the bearpit that is Slashdot

  26. Ubuntu 8.10 by ultrabot · · Score: 1

    Ubuntu 8.10 + array.org kernel is just fine.

    At least on eee pc 900 you still need to use ndiswrapper for wlan - even if it would appear that the native drivers work, they don't. The connection is slower and breaks easier with them.

    --
    Save your wrists today - switch to Dvorak
  27. Ubuntu 8.04 on my 900A by jddeluxe · · Score: 1

    I have the newer Asus eee 900A model running Ubuntu 8.04, no issues at all to speak of; if you can use the Google getting all the tips/tweaks to get it properly installed/running/tuned is no big whoop. Also, you should be able to find a backup .ISO for the Xandros distro available on the web, I personally can't stand it, but it might suit you better....

    1. Re:Ubuntu 8.04 on my 900A by Anne+Honime · · Score: 1

      I second that, although after a while I realised that xandros somehow grew on me to the point I'm doing my things mostly with it. I reserve Xubuntu for those rare cases I need somthing I can't run with stock xandros (GNUstep, for instance).

  28. Easy Peasy? by magpie · · Score: 1

    Ok I have an AA1 rather than an eee pc, but Easy Peasy works fine(I did an update and the issues it did have went).

  29. Zenwalk Linux by Sh1fty · · Score: 1

    I've been running Zenwalk on my EEE 901 for months now and haven't had much trouble. I wouldn't suggest it for people who like everything working out of the box, since I had to install both wifi and eth drivers on my own, so you don't have any connectivity in the beginning. You should definitely try the OS you're considering on a virtual machine first, just to be sure that you like it. Also, whichever distro you choose, you'll have to do your homework first ;)

  30. NDISWRAPPER by rtobyr · · Score: 1

    I've got Ubuntu running just fine on my Eee 901 using NDISWrapper. Go to http://packages.ubuntu.com/intrepid/ and download the following onto a flash drive (you'll get them with the .deb extension upon clicking the link for your architecture--i386):

    From the Misc category: ndiswrapper-common and ndiswrapper-utils-1.9

    From the Network category: ndisgtk

    Put your flash drive into your Ubuntu Eee. Double click the .deb files in the order that I mentioned them above. Now you'll have a "Windows Wireless Drivers" item in your System/Administration menu. Open it and feed it the .inf and .sys files from your windows wifi drivers.

  31. Amazing coincidence, freshmeat release? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the side bar when I saw this story there was a release for this http://freshmeat.net/releases/294719/

    Has anyone tried it on an eee pc?

  32. not linux by castironpigeon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    In my own limited experience I have not found a single Linux distro that works well out of the box. Stick to Windows or plan to make this a weekend project.

    --
    mmmm...forbidden donut
    1. Re:not linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you're running on hardware that's around five or more years old, Windows won't run particularly well out-of-the-box either.

      And if we're talking about hardware that old, several Debian-based distros work well out-of-the-box. Linux Mint, for example, comes with Flash, Java, MP3 support, and drivers for Broadcom chipsets, all out-of-the-box.

    2. Re:not linux by PFI_Optix · · Score: 1

      Windows usually works quite well if it's shipped on the PC, as is the case here.

      Read the comments here: Linux experience has been hit-and-miss using it on Eee. When people say "it was great, I just had to fix _______" and "It only takes xx additional packages to make it work right" that means that out-of-the-box performance shouldn't be expected.

      commentary: I'm always amazed by topics like this because they demonstrate some shortcomings in Linux that make it unsuitable for people looking for EASY solutions, and yet the give-me-linux-or-give-me-death crowd acts like such things don't happen any more. Can't we just accept that Linux still isn't ready for everyone and get on with life?

      end soapbox.

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    3. Re:not linux by castironpigeon · · Score: 1

      First off, I've never had XP not run well out of the box on any computer I've installed it on. That would include everything from pre-built Dell junkboxes to my own homebuilt machine a few years ago.

      Second, I've got to agree with the soapbox commentary. Linux is not easy and Linux is not ready for mass consumption. And there's another reason why Linux isn't ready besides its difficulty of use: there is no such thing as the Linux OS, there are only hundreds of flavors of Linux of various popularity. There are currently 3 versions of Windows that 99% of people will be dealing with: XP, 2000, and Vista. If you want one for desktop use, that would be XP. See? Easy. If you ask 100 different people what distro of Linux you should get you'll get at least 120 answers. So even if there happens to exist a perfect distro for me out there I'll probably never find it because I actually like spending my time on the computer doing stuff other than trying out new distros and I'm sure many other Windows users would agree.

      --
      mmmm...forbidden donut
    4. Re:not linux by rusl · · Score: 1

      If you'll accept that windows isn't ready for ANYONE.

      --
      Stupidity is its own reward.
  33. cruncheee is based off ubuntu and works OOTB by EponymousCustard · · Score: 1

    i've tried xandros->eeebuntu->ubuntu->debian (which worked well OOTB) now i'm on cruncheee, which also works well out of the box on my eee 701, except i experience the same firefox lag that i also experienced with ubuntu. (debian didn't noticeably have this problem but i wanted to try openbox and cruncheee was just a iso file away -home dir on my SD card.)

    1. Re:cruncheee is based off ubuntu and works OOTB by laharrin · · Score: 1

      I have used the default Xandros, vanilla Ubuntu, and eeebuntu, but I am also now very happy with cruncheee. The main thing, however, is to use eeepc kernel from array.org.

    2. Re:cruncheee is based off ubuntu and works OOTB by monjolo · · Score: 1

      Another vote for CrunchEEE. It's lightweight, real fast and works like a charm. Just awesome. Try it! -- http://crunchbanglinux.org/

  34. HP 2133 Netbook by sindicate · · Score: 1

    My hp2133 runs Ubuntu 8.10, just fine. Video drivers make the process slightly ragged getting the OS on the unit, but once thats done, its smooth sailing. Ubuntu had the most hardware support for netbooks of the distros i looked into.

  35. I recommend... by n3tcat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Windows 7. I'm sure it would rate the performance of your EEE PC in the 3.5 range.

    1. Re:I recommend... by Dr+Egg · · Score: 1

      I wholeheartedly agree. I used 7 on my 901 for a month, and the native multi touch support and combined with a task bar that actually works when moved to the left hand side makes it such a great fit for netbooks. Only thing is that 7 took up like 3.5GB of my 4GB SSD in my 901, so I gave in and put XP back on it, and that is only like a 3GB install for me. I really do hate the usability of XP compared to 7. It's just nowhere near 7 or even Vista in terms of usability.

  36. Re:don't want to sound elitist by agrounds · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think I speak for all of slashdot when I say this.

    No, you really don't. You just speak for judgmental, obnoxious pricks that believe the world should operate only according to their narrow-minded rules. People like you are the reason linux only enjoys a 1.2% marketshare.

    A lot of us actually would like to see better market penetration and a system that is universally accessible and enjoyed by users of all proficiency levels. This is a requirement for the big software houses to want to port their products to *nix.

  37. Debian Lenny with extra Repo by TP2k · · Score: 1

    I use plain Debian (Lenny) on my eee 901. Most things work out-the-box and for the things that don't there is a eee Repo.

    The things I needed to install from the eee Repo were the wireless drivers (rt2860) and the acpi-scripts.

    I personally much prefer using a mainstream distro instead of a small(er) project that might disappear one day.

    1. Re:Debian Lenny with extra Repo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If more people would use it and contribute to it, then it wouldn't be a 'small(er) project' any more.

  38. Slackware by DJ+Haruko · · Score: 1

    I've been using Slackware 12.1 on my 900A Eee PC for a while now. Before that, I was using it on a 701. In both cases, it worked really well and was very responsive (I chose to use Xfce as my desktop environment since I wasn't that familiar with Fluxbox at the time). I've even done some Common Lisp programming on them with a locally compiled SBCL. One thing I noticed in particular was that I got more free space out of my 4gb SSD than with Ubuntu-Eee or the default Xandros-based distro. Slackware 12.2 should actually work out of the box. 12.1 required a modified kernel and a few other things (packages at http://slackeee.strangled.net/). The only thing to keep in mind is that I do a lot of things by hand on my boxen, such as set up wifi connections on the command line, so Slackware may not be the best choice for you if you're not used to this sort of thing. I did a short writeup on installing onto my 701 on my blog, as well: http://blog.partition36.com/2008/07/04/eee-pc-meet-slackware/

    --
    "If you were plowing a field, which would you rather use? Two strong oxen or 1024 chickens?" --Seymour Cray
  39. don't like XP?!? by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 1

    I have a eee 900 with XP pro. I run world of warcraft, SQL server, and visual studio on it. (did upgrade to 2gb ram).

    Never had a problem with anything, but that's also due to understanding what it can and cannot do on such limited hardware.

    I do really like it, although I've got my eyes on the N10 model now...

    1. Re:don't like XP?!? by wastedlife · · Score: 1

      Did yours come with XP pro? His probably came with XP Home, which I thought was the only version of XP that is still sold through OEMs (not counting Vista "downgrades" for businesses).

      --
      Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
  40. mandriva 2009.0 by marros · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have a MSI wind and installed Mandriva 2009.0 and everything worked from the start. The hardware on the wind is almost the same as the eePC, and Mandriva was designed with netbooks in mind.

    1. Re:mandriva 2009.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second this, got an EEE 1000, I'm an ubuntu man, but until they support all the hardware, mandriva 2009 works perfectly out od the box and has a nice KDE 4 interface and compiz. i had a lot of difficullty finding a way to install from usb though, eventually i gave in and bought an usb dvd drive.

  41. Debian + wicd. - Re:Which distro? by steve9001 · · Score: 1

    I've been using Debian Lenny on eee 1000 for about 6 months now. Works good for me. After installing from the OS from the DebianEeePC link above, then install wicd from here. The wicd made my debian eee pc much more enjoyable. http://wicd.sourceforge.net/download.php ##### Too bad Tim didn't buy the linux version of the eee PC, even though you pay the same price for the windows version, you pay the microsoft tax in the form of a smaller harddrive. Still, better late than never.

  42. Mandriva 2008.1 by Skid_00 · · Score: 1

    I have one of the original EEE PC 701 models and I put Mandriva 2008.1 and KDE onto the 4GB SSD. Web cam, wireless, everything works. I haven't even used the 4GB SDHC card yet. Mandriva + the EEE makes for a very nice and powerful, yet portable package for light surfing, emails and SSH connections to the home net. Skid

  43. Fedora 9 by esocid · · Score: 1

    I'm using Fedora 9 on my (old, I know) dell inspirion 5100. All the devices are supported, but the wireless did take an hour or two to set up using ndiswrapper. Although, I take that back. It took an hour or two to figure out which was the right driver I needed.

    I'm holding off on compiling the new kernel until I assemble my new desktop, just waiting for the case and CPU. Or I may just put Fedora 10 on.

    --
    Absolute power corrupts absolutely. indymedia
    1. Re:Fedora 9 by HappyHead · · Score: 1

      I've got fedora 9 on my Eee 900, and everything works out of the box. (including the wireless)

  44. Ubuntu 8.10 with Array kernel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ubuntu 8.10 is working fine on my Eee 1000HD. Installed from a USB key, changed the kernel and rebooted - wifi worked straight away.

    http://array.org/ubuntu/setup-intrepid.html has details on how to handle the special kernel for the Eee.

  45. ubuntu-eee (well, easy peasy) is fine... by Rhys · · Score: 1

    Just make sure you stick on eee-control (you'll have to install some of their acpi script stuff, all easy to do with the package manager) and turn off the junk you aren't using.

    I had been using stock ubuntu before that, with the array.org (go there, set up his repos) kernel + eee-control. Battery life was better using that than ubuntu-eee, so I may end up back there yet.

    Wireless is a bit touchy either way. I've heard that using ndiswrapper fixes that, but wireless has been "good enough" for my use.

    --
    Slashdot Patriotism: We Support our Dupes!
    1. Re:ubuntu-eee (well, easy peasy) is fine... by IANAAC · · Score: 1
      I use UbuntuEEE also. Never had a problem with it on my 701.

      I think most wireless problems come down to differences in models. I have zero problems with wireless, including WPA2, which some people seem to have problems with.

  46. I would give MEPIS a try by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would give Mepis 8 a try. Despite it is not a special Eee distribution, with my Samsung NC10 everything works OOTB.

    Several users have also installed it successfully in a Eeepc 1000HA. More info here

  47. Use? by mattpm · · Score: 2, Informative

    What exactly are you using your EeePC for? If you are simply using it for email and internet I don't see how XP can be so frustrating. I use XP on my 901 and it works like a charm for what is essentially surfing, msn (with miranda client of course) and taking lecture notes. I find the secret to increased usability and efficiency with XP on a small screen is to disable all desktop icons, move the taskbar to the top and keep your start menu organized.

    1. Re:Use? by insanex · · Score: 1

      Lol, sounds like you're describing Ubuntu out of the box, so why not just use that?

    2. Re:Use? by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      Forget organizing the Start menu. Install Launchy - http://www.launchy.net/ It indexes your start menu, so any program you want, hit Alt-Space, type a few characters of the program name, and hit Enter.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    3. Re:Use? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      If you are simply using it for email and internet I don't see how XP can be so frustrating.

      If he's only using it for "email and internet", then it is very likely that a tweaked slim Linux distro will be able to do it all much smoother than XP.

  48. Defending WinXP Weakly by thomas_of_needham · · Score: 1

    I run xampp with Apache server on my Asus EEE 1000 and it performs quite well along with a wireless usb modem talking to my server for a Geocaching application. The application fits on a USB flash drive as well. If you are into Geocaching you can see various versions at http://gpsmancer.com/ All in all the Asus with WinXp is a great netbook that runs my applications perfectly.

  49. Stock Ubuntu by jalefkowit · · Score: 5, Informative

    I found stock Ubuntu Intrepid with a few tweaks to be easier to set up and more pain-free than any of the "easy/tuned" distros are. Once I had everything working (including wireless), I wrote up a HOWTO explaining how to go from bare metal to a fully working system so that others wouldn't have to go digging through a dozen forums to find the info. Check it out, might be all you need to get up and going.

    1. Re:Stock Ubuntu by wicka · · Score: 1

      eee-control-tray is, probably, exactly what I need. I could get most things working (Wifi, function keys) but I nothing could replicate the functionality of the EeePC control panel, and thus battery life was god awful.

    2. Re:Stock Ubuntu by cide · · Score: 1

      That's a decent walkthru document. I actually didn't know about the IPv6 compatibility issues.

      I should cite on my site.

    3. Re:Stock Ubuntu by jalefkowit · · Score: 1

      High praise indeed! Thank you! I owe you a beer for all your hard work on the EEE kernel...

    4. Re:Stock Ubuntu by wicka · · Score: 1

      I spent a good chunk of my day install and configuring Ubuntu, only to have the final fucking step (eee-control-tray) tell me that I'm not running a supported model. FUCK THIS

  50. Moon-ghost Linux? by UbuntuLinux · · Score: 0, Funny

    I have been worried for a number of weeks now, about what would happen where a powerful OS like Linux fall into the hands of the ghosts that haunt the moon. We all know that spaceships don't run Windows, so if a spaceship crashed on the moon, it would be likely that moon ghosts would find their way inside, and, due to their curious nature, tamper with the computers. If one of these computers had Linux on it, it would give the moon ghosts technology that they would not be able to comprehend or use responsibly (ghosts *cannot* use technology responsibly, this is scientific fact) which could have dire consequences for the human race.

    My idea is to write a Moon-ghost distribution of Linux (suggestions for names welcome!) that would be very cut down, so it had little power. This distribution would be installed on all planet-bound spacecraft. This way, if it they where to crash on the moon, the moon ghosts would not have such a powerful tool. My question to Slashdot is, what distro would be good to use for this? What sort of features could be removed? Wireless obviously has to stay in as the spaceships need to communicate with earth, and they would need webcam functionality to photograph stars and craters and things.

    1. Re:Moon-ghost Linux? by tezbobobo · · Score: 1

      I would probably use an insecure distro so we could hack back in if they do take control. I think also, it might be a good approach to ADD features. Whilst astronauts are disciplined and professional, ghost are less organised. Maybe some games to waste a bit of time and get them onside. Maybe SUSE would be a good choice. Then again, we could make it something that required a high degree of technical proficiency. The ghost are behind the proverbial technological eight ball so maybe a text interface would be best.

  51. SLACKWARE! by ag3ntugly · · Score: 1

    I installed slackware 12.2 on my eee 900, (had to do it from an SD card, but thats not too hard) and everything works. I didn't have to monkey around with anything to get anything working. I just copied my rc.inet1 from another machine to bring up the wireless at boot and viola. It's wayyyy faster than XP too. Feels really good on that little machine.

    --
    i have a roll of electrical tape.
  52. Ubuntu 8.04 + array.org kernel by John+Anonymous · · Score: 1

    On my EEEPC 901, I installed stock Ubuntu 8.04 from a USB flash drive using UNetbootin, then added the array.org kernel (http://www.array.org/ubuntu/index.html). All hardware works, including accelerated video, wireless, etc.

    Ubuntu 8.10 on the same netbook was horribly slow.

  53. Instead of wanting a distro that "just works"... by thereofone · · Score: 1

    ...put a little effort into making it work how you want it to work. Every distribution has a fairly comprehensive wiki at this point. Even if they don't, you can almost always figure out what to do from another distro's howto and documentation. Gone are the days of reading obtuse man pages on flickering consoles. Anyone with a length of cat5 and an afternoon can solve 99% of their issues and come out the better for it. Unless, of course, you get frustrated and fashion a noose with the ethernet cable.

  54. Re:don't want to sound elitist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't worry about sounding "elitist", sounding like a total asshole trumps that, easily.

  55. Ubuntu Netbook-remix by villindesign · · Score: 1

    I've been using the 9.04 Ubuntu netbook-remix release without problem (even though it is an Alpha4 release). You might give it a try. The interface is very convenient for smaller screens and resolutions.

    --
    loading [******___]
  56. wifi drivers, atheros and ralink by bcrowell · · Score: 3, Informative

    I bought a Eee, with Linux preinstalled to give to my wife for her birthday last week. The wifi didn't work. Called Asus tech support, and they figured out that the problem was that the machine had an RaLink wifi card, but the only one they had working drivers for was Atheros. They weren't able to offer any solution other than returning it, so I did.

    Since they have RaLink on some of their machines, and they say they don't have working Linux drivers for RaLink, it sounds like some of the Windows versions have RaLink, and therefore the OP should check that before trying to switch to Linux.

    If you look at the Amazon reviews for the model I bought, you'll see a lot of people complaining that they bought the Linux version, installed Windows, and then Windows didn't work right. On all of those, I clicked the "NO" link next to "Was this review helpful to you?," because that's just silly. If you want Windows, you buy the Windows version. Installing an OS on a desktop tends to be a hassle, doing it on a standard notebook has many more pitfalls, and doing it on a netbook is even more difficult to get right. It's pretty silly that these people are blaming Asus when essentially they just bought the wrong model.

    The OP seems to be making the same mistake, but in reverse, which seems even less sensible to me. It means that MS is getting a Windows tax from him for an OS he doesn't like and isn't going to use. Great way to support an illegal monopoly when you didn't even have to, as well as creating huge hassles for yourself. My advice at this point would be either to return it if he can, or sell it on eBay, and then buy one with Linux preinstalled.

    BTW, a little googling will show that a lot of people are receiving Eees with nonfunctional wifi. I'm really looking forward to the day when Linux-based desktop and laptop machines are so cheap and good that it puts MS out of business. Unfortunately, that day hasn't come yet. The quality just isn't there yet. I've bought PCs with Linux preinstalled from a variety of vendors (Great Quality, WalMart, Asus) over the last 5 years or so. The best that ever happened was that the hardware was fine but the version of Linux that came preinstalled (ThizLinux, gOS) was lousy, so I wiped the disk and installed something else (FreeBSD, Ubuntu). The worst that ever happened was this experience with the Eee.

    1. Re:wifi drivers, atheros and ralink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh what? ralink drivers are supported both in the Linux kernel and by ralink themselves. Did you even bother checking the wireless chip manufacturer's website?

      I just built a mini-itx machine using a Medialink USB wireless ethernet stick which lsdev showed as a Ralink chip. Both the rt73usb driver in the kernel and the rt73 driver from ralink work perfectly.

    2. Re:wifi drivers, atheros and ralink by cide · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here's the rule of thumb I've followed... however I've only tested this with the Linux version. (I wasn't aware that Windows EeePC 901s use Atheros)

      EeePC ==701SD: Realtek Wifi
      EeePC <900A: Atheros Wifi
      EeePC >=901: RaLink Wifi

      As a result, the modules, depending on the version of Linux you're using varies.

      Atheros Wifi on <=2.6.24: ath_pci (madwifi) external driver
      Atheros Wifi on >=2.6.26: ath5k internal driver
      RaLink Wifi on < 2.6.28: rt2860sta external driver
      RaLink Wifi on > 2.6.28: rt2860sta internal driver*
      Realtek Wifi on < 2.6.28: rtl8187se external driver
      Realtek Wifi on > 2.6.29: rtl8187se internal driver

      * Heres the crux, as of 2.6.28, the rt2860sta internal driver uses version 1.8.0.0, but this version has broken WPA/WPA2 support. If you somehow ended up with 1.7.0.0, it too has broken WPA/WPA2 support.

      However, rt2860sta v1.7.1.1 appears to be good.

      I've been working on porting the changes introduced in v1.7.1.1 into v1.8.x.x for 2.6.29. So far it works for me, but I still need to submit this as a patch into the kernel:

      http://git.array.org/?p=kernel/stable/linux-2.6-stable.git;a=commit;h=ee8834f5551943b7bd2db49bbad9ba3c24ce6f67

    3. Re:wifi drivers, atheros and ralink by wastedlife · · Score: 1

      Thats odd, RaLink support in linux has historically been very good. They even open the source for many of their drivers.

      --
      Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
    4. Re:wifi drivers, atheros and ralink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought the XP version because it was the only one with a SATA interface and 80 Gig drive, then installed linux on it. I figured once the SSD market matured I could at least through in a SATA SSD. This is correct all versions of the Eeepc are NOT THE SAME! I have a 1000H, it is not the same as a 700 or 900. Wireless and Wired NIC on a 1000H do not work out of the box. So if you do an install with unebootin be sure to have the deb packages for the drivers.

    5. Re:wifi drivers, atheros and ralink by bcrowell · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the very informative post! Just to clarify, what I bought was the Eee PC 1000, and I don't have WPA on my wifi network. I also don't know for sure that RaLink is what they use on the Windows version of that model; all I know is that the tech was surprised that mine had RaLink, and she told me it wouldn't work, and they didn't have any way to make it work for me.

    6. Re:wifi drivers, atheros and ralink by cide · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ.

      1. As I mentioned before, the latest version on their site is rt2860 v1.8.0.0. While it will work for some wireless, it will not work with WPA/WPA2 encryption. v1.7.0.0 had the same problem

      2. Ralink fixed WPA/WPA2 encryption in v1.7.1.1, but these changes were never ported to v1.8.0.0, and only that version is available from their site. Zero mention of these problems, or previous working versions.

      3. I cannot even find the original location where I downloaded v1.7.1.1 anymore. I think I got it over email as an "EEEPC Special Version".

      4. Open the source code the overall code is very sloppy. Goto statements, few comments, bad spacing and wording, poor naming conventions, i'm surprised it compiles. (FYI, Compile with EEEPC_SPECIAL_SETTING enabled on v1.7.1.1 to fix WPA/WPA2 encryption, I kid you not!)

      5. Ralink has no indention of supporting their Linux drivers. Greg KH has included their v1.8.0.0 under the kernel as a staging driver with a TODO":

              Please send any patches or complaints about this driver to Greg
              Kroah-Hartman and don't bother the upstream wireless
              kernel developers about it, they want nothing to do with it.

    7. Re:wifi drivers, atheros and ralink by wastedlife · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info, my statement was based on having read many times before that generally RaLink wireless cards were recommended for use with linux. Is it just the chipsets used in the eee that have poor linux support, or is it a problem overall with their products?

      --
      Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
    8. Re:wifi drivers, atheros and ralink by cide · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think this is the reason why the eeepc and other netbooks have been so cheap.

      They tend to use newer hardware components that do not have a track record for rock-solid support in linux and windows. Manufacturers (Asus isn't the only one) select bids from the vendors with the lowest price.

      Its not a coincidence that other non-Asus products end up with similar wifi/ethernet cards as Asus (Acer Aspire One, MSI Wind specifically), and thus have the exact same problems in support on linux.

      What makes this rt2860 driver particularly unusual is that there are existing internal (community supplied) Linux kernel drivers for other ralink hardware available, but this rt2860 deviates from them so much, existing drivers useless for this hardware.

      Coupled with the fact that Ralink has done such a poor job with version control, IMHO, (See reasons #2 and #3 above) it only causes endless greif for someone who automatically assumes that the latest version is always the greatest.

      "Huh?.. rt2860 v1.8.0.0 doesn't contain anything fixed from v1.7.1.1?? But its got a higher number! WTF?"

    9. Re:wifi drivers, atheros and ralink by fondacio · · Score: 1

      Thank you for this and obviously for the work you put into the EEE PC kernel, which I am using on my 901 in the unfortunately named Easy Peasy. I'd just like to add for information that even though my wireless card works fine on WPA and other networks, I have not been able to get LEAP or PEAP working, and therefore assume that something is still not working properly even with 1.7.1.1. People who need this kind of authentication may be better off getting a netbook with a different chipset.

    10. Re:wifi drivers, atheros and ralink by cide · · Score: 1

      You're not the first person to mention LEAP or PEAP support. These are actually an authentication protocols, that happen use WEP and WPA encryption, respectively.

      Your problem is that NetworkManager itself does not support LEAP or PEAP authentication when negotiating a connection with your access point.

      You may want to try http://www.wicd.net/ as an alternative to NetworkManager (it too has some shortcomings) or there are some howtos online for making LEAP/PEAP work (Google "ubuntu LEAP")

      Good luck :)

    11. Re:wifi drivers, atheros and ralink by xtracto · · Score: 1

      If you want Windows, you buy the Windows version. Installing an OS on a desktop tends to be a hassle, doing it on a standard notebook has many more pitfalls, and doing it on a netbook is even more difficult to get right. It's pretty silly that these people are blaming Asus when essentially they just bought the wrong model.

      Just yesterday I was looking at the Dell Mini 12'' (which I think is the best netbook offerin due to the screen size) in dell.co.uk

      I do not why but they just offer the 1.3 ghz Atom if you choose the Linux version, whereas they offer the 1.6 version if you get the Widows version...
      That may be a good reason to buy the Windows one.

      Unfortunately (according to some comments I read) it is not possible to increase the memory of the Dell to more than the 1GB they provide.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    12. Re:wifi drivers, atheros and ralink by wastedlife · · Score: 1

      Maybe they use Nvidia graphics card model numbering as their basis for version numbers.

      "I bought a 9400 GT and my games run slower than they did with my 8800 GTX"
      "Well thats because its a weaker card."
      "But the number is higher, this is false advertising!"
      "..."

      I used to do phone support for a graphics card manufacturer.

      --
      Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
  57. Try Arch Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.archlinux.org/

    Download the the latest ISO/USB image (USB image would be preferable unless you have an external optical drive)

    Links to mirrors / the torrent (pick i686)
    http://www.archlinux.org/download/

    I use it with my Acer Aspire One, and all the drivers are working nicely

  58. Mandriva 2009.1 by edit0r · · Score: 2, Informative

    Mandriva 2009.1 everything works out of the box

    1. Re:Mandriva 2009.1 by rcbooth · · Score: 1

      It works for me. When I first got my 900 I tried several Linux flavors but Mandriva was the only one that worked flawlessly right out of the box. You have a choice of KDE or Gnome desktops and I settled on Gnome. RCB

    2. Re:Mandriva 2009.1 by Linegod · · Score: 1

      Mandriva 2009.0 was what I went with. Works great.

      --
      -- I care not for your foolish signatures.
    3. Re:Mandriva 2009.1 by traildog · · Score: 1

      Mandriva 2009.0 works great on a 701 4g

    4. Re:Mandriva 2009.1 by cenc · · Score: 1

      accept that is a bloated dog of an linux os with a want to be windows vista complex.

  59. Re:I'm sorry to the reality-hater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you are a narrow-minded prick. ever heard of 'knowing the enemy'? you probably like to spout the virtues of free speech, but can't stand it when someone says something you don't like. nice double-standard you got there.

  60. Mine came with Ubuntu... by ashtophoenix · · Score: 1

    and the wireless as well as everything else works perfectly. I tried to do a dual boot to install XP and failed. The reason I was trying to install XP was that I wanted to use the Verizon Adapter for wireless via my cell as I didn't want to pay T-Mobile at a starbucks for wireless. The drivers/software to use a Verizon cellphone for Internet access via your computer is only available for Windows (and Macs too I suppose) but not for Linux. But as far as regular wireless/oofice and such go, Ubuntu works just fine for me out of the box.

    --
    Life is about being a Phoenix!
  61. Debian unstable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm using Debian unstable. I installed it using a bootable flash stick. Then run fdisk to partition, then encrypt with cryptsetup luks, then format the drives (mkfs.ext3 or whatever) , then use debootstrap to install a bare bones debian system, then setup fstab and modify initramfs scripts to boot an encrypted root.

    It's really quite easy to do it yourself if you are an expert.

    If you are security conscious you will want a separate encrypted partition you keep unmounted when going out (in case someone steals your laptop while it is in sleep or on)

  62. PC-BSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PC-BSD has worked flawlessly on my 1000HA, sans built in webcam/mic and probably nic which I've never tried.
    Stock FreeBSD works also but needs an updated atheros HAL (or use -CURRENT).

    kismet with several hours of battery life is a wonderful thing.

  63. Wireless by Nutty_Irishman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you replace the wireless card with an intel based wireless card, you should have no problems with any linux distro. I replaced my wireless card on my MSI Wind with the Intel 3945 and have no problems in linux http://www.google.com/products?q=intel+PRO+3945

  64. Dual Boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm dual booting Windows 7 7022 and Cruncheee on my 901, and they both work like a dream, try them out. I know Cruncheee supports the 1000 series, and I don't see any reason W7 wouldn't.

  65. ubuntu-eee by Vexorian · · Score: 1

    I installed ubuntu-eee 8.04.1 on my rather old eee (701 4G ) and it worked fine. Wireless, no slow down, the interface is good for small stuff and the battery drains fast - when the thing is turned off, this is a bug with the computer's itself and not related with the OS - I am not sure if it could have really gone much worse with 8.10 or if it is the computer that got worse with new releases.

    --

    Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
  66. HP MIE by sam.haskins · · Score: 2, Informative

    The HP "Mobile Internet Experience" Distro, designed to be only used on their netbooks, but _excellent_ on others, including my Lenovo S10 is my recommendation. You install it by using HP's "recovery usb key" tool :) Get it at http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/softwareList?os=2020&lc=en&dlc=en&cc=us&product=3860346# It's very usuable, and fits right into the idea of a personal device as a resource to you. Plus, it's Ubuntu underneath, so you can add whatever you want :)

  67. not eeepc but eeebox by Kazin · · Score: 1

    I've got an eeebox b202, which is supposed to be basically a eeepc 1000HA or something. Anyways, everything works, except I can't get hardware acceleration and OpenGL working with the Intel 954GMA display chip. Nothing I've found on the 'net makes it work properly. I suspect it's just too new for the drivers to have properly caught up.

    I'm using Gentoo, which I use on all of my machines.

    1. Re:not eeepc but eeebox by cide · · Score: 1

      Can you do me a favour?

      Run $ sudo lspci -v -nn

      and forward the output to my contact page on array.org/ubuntu/about.html

      I might be able to give you an answer.

  68. Debian unstable works fine here. by ac3tyl · · Score: 1

    Debian unstable and a self compiled, patched (for the cam and wireless network), vanilla kernel work fine here.

  69. ArchLinux? by lwsimon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm planning on using ArchLinux when I get mine. They seem to have good community support, and it doesn't come with any fluff you don't need.

    It is a bit more difficult to install, though.

    --
    Learn about Photography Basics.
    1. Re:ArchLinux? by killeena · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I installed Arch on my 701, and I have been really happy with it so far. I only have what I need installed on it, and the thing boots in like 20 seconds. There is actually a good article in the works on the Arch wiki on how to set it up on the eee. There are custom kernels that are ready to go and everything. If you know your way around linux good enough, I would recommend giving it a try.

      --
      Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to abjure such prescribed choices. -Theodor Adorno
    2. Re:ArchLinux? by Kadoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The latest archlinux ftp install worked without custom kernel on my 701, wifi and all. The img file makes it easy to install on the cd-less computer.

    3. Re:ArchLinux? by polemistes · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you want an optimized system, Arch Linux is not more difficult than any other distro. You just don't have the choice to install a complete desktop system with lots and lots of things you don't want, configured in ways you don't like, so that you can uninstall almost everything and then install what you want, from obscure package repos, so you get library confusions etc, for then to reconfigure almost everything, so it works the way you like it to.

      The Arch Linux installer lets you:

      1. Install a very basic system
      2. Configure the most important things in one simple configuration file (or a few more if you want or need to)

      Then you boot into your basic system and:

      1. Update your system with one command
      2. Install the programs you need. The package manager will take care of all dependencies.
      3. Configure them the way you want them
      4. Enjoy!

      Of course, I agree, this is more difficult than letting someone else make all the choices for you.

      By the way, I use Arch Linux on a Eee 901, and it works perfectly. There are some tricks to speed it up. Mounting the /tmp and /var/log and /var/tmp as a ram disk makes it a lot more responsive. Turning off disk cache in firefox is also a good idea.
      Driver support isn't a problem for me at least. Everything works. You might need to install a customized kernel package for the wireless card, but from 2.6.29 there will be support for the card in the kernel (This is for the 901, I don't know about the 1000HD).

    4. Re:ArchLinux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just installed Arch Linux on my dell m1210 on friday, and i like it a lot more than ubuntu. Its cleaner and faster and just as functional, if not moreso. :)

    5. Re:ArchLinux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I myself purchased a 1000HD and I've successfully installed arch linux on it with a light XFCE desktop. It will require a bit more effort than, say, ubuntu, but once you have it set up it runs like an absolute dream on the EEE.

      The arch linux wiki provides excellent instructions on how t set it up. This page is specifically for the 901, but almost all of it carries over to the 1000HD except a few things.
      http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Asus_Eee_PC_901

      The only hiccup I encountered was setting up the ethernet module on it, although wireless worked out of the box just fine. I'm using wicd with it at the moment.

    6. Re:ArchLinux? by lwsimon · · Score: 1

      I agree that it is easier to set up and configure than Ubuntu if you know what you want --- I just meant that it has a much higher barrier of entry.

      As far as mounting /var/log to RAM, that kinda defeats the purpose doesn't it? If you're not using the logfiles, why not just not load the log daemon? You can always manually load them if you need to debug something.

      Also, there is one big caveat to Arch - the system update can and will break things. I would not recommend Arch to someone who wants a rock solid system. Its great if you want to be on the bleeding edge, though, and it is very easy to debug.

      Simple is better!

      --
      Learn about Photography Basics.
    7. Re:ArchLinux? by polemistes · · Score: 1

      Yes, if you have much use for /var/log you should mount it so it doesn't disappear after reboot... There are a lot of programs that write there even when the log deamon isn't running, so I normally turn it off, and if there's some strange error I turn it on again. I haven't tested if this speeds the system up at all, though.
      And yes, system upgrade breaks things, but usually (but not always) you get warned about this by pacman during upgrading.
      If stability were a big concern, and I needed simplicity, performance and customizability, I would still run Arch Linux, but I would need a test system and only upgrade the production system when I knew it would be stable.
      Of course this isn't very practical if you only have an eee with a 20Gb ssd.

  70. Arch Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Arch works well for my Eee PC 1000. If you choose another distro, the Arch wiki still makes for a decent guide.

  71. what about w7 by VagaStorm · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If you whant Linux, I would generaly recomend OpenSuse, but I have no idea if if works on your computer. However, if you like vista, maybe try installing the windows 7 beta, it is reported to run wery well on netbooks.

  72. Regular Ubuntu Intrepid - with an easy-to-install by joer4 · · Score: 1

    I use standard Ubuntu Intrepid, with this custom kernel http://www.array.org/ubuntu/setup.html which was really easy to setup, and works like a charm! There is also an ACPI script which gives all the extra buttons on the EEE something useful to do. I've been running it since Intrepid was released, and prior to that I used Hardy. Neither have given me any problems.

  73. Mod Parent Informative by mpapet · · Score: 1

    This is a good distro for netbooks. Easy Peasy has gone to some effort to create a desktop that accomodates such a small monitor.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  74. try eeebuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i have a 900a (one of the smallest netbooks) and i love eeebuntu. it's ubuntu made for the eee with optimizing scripts, and an available 3 different distros the base is a small no bloat iso, and the full install is just what it sounds, while the remix is more similar to the original distro from xandros.

  75. Fedora? by jon3k · · Score: 1

    I'm almost afraid to say it with the army of Ubuntu users on here, but I've installed fedora 10 on both an Asus Eee 901 and a Dell Mini9 for a couple different friends and it's worked fantastic.

    Just don't forget, assuming solid state disk, to set noatime in fstab for the appropriate mount point(s). You'll see a massive improvement in performance, and, in theory, life span of your flash based disk.

    1. Re:Fedora? by cjb-nc · · Score: 1

      I second this, except that I installed Fedora 9 on my 901 before 10 was available. It has worked well for me, as I am more comfortable with the Redhat/Fedora-style environment.

  76. Easy Peasy by ohnotherobots · · Score: 1

    I use easy peasy on my 1000. It's renamed from ubuntu-eee but uses 8.10 instead of 8.04. It has worked much better for me than ubuntu-eee did. Not sure how it compares to eeebuntu since I just heard about that from comments here, but I'll probably give that a try tonight to make sure I'm not missing out on the fun.

  77. Moblin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't tried Moblin yet since the wifi for eee pc isn't working atm, but it seems very interesting. Light, should boot in about 5sec and hopefully battery efficient too without all the clutter. All that I'm expecting from a netbook that I mainly use for ircing and browsing.

  78. Fedora has awesome power managment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    http://magazine.redhat.com/2008/02/14/fedora-eee-pc-eeedora/

  79. Re:Instead of wanting a distro that "just works".. by BlackCreek · · Score: 1
    No.

    I want to simply be able to buy hardware with Linux installed, and I expect that hardware/software to "just work".

    While I have the experience to solve problems, it is simply not reasonable to accept buying products that are not properly supported.

    I reckon that a broken dist or hardware without OS is better than paying for Windows, that is still not satisfactory situation.

  80. arch or eeebuntu by two+basket+skinner · · Score: 1

    After ditching the stock xandros that came on my eeepc 700 2G, i tried ubuntu-eee netbook remix (now easy peasy) but performance was not great. I tried eeebuntu-base which was a lot better and includes one-click scripts for you to run at anytime to get the configuration and performance just right for your model. but for what i use my little laptop for (local or remote development) i realized that a command-line was really all i needed so now have arch linux installed with toofishes' custom kernel for the eee and no GUI (for now). It boots fast, only has what i need and pretty easy to update with pacman (rolling distro). Its pretty awesome. The Arch Linux wiki entry for installing on an eee has some great general purpose advice http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Installing_Arch_Linux_on_the_Asus_EEE_PC#Avoiding_Pitfalls

  81. Re:don't want to sound elitist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't want to sound elitist, either, but if you can't program working, fully 100% compatible versions of Adobe Photoshop and Microsoft Access, in addition to building your own software corporation from the ground-up, then, well, you're not welcome in the ASS/Hole community.

    I think I speak for all snobby pricks when I say this.

  82. Oh please. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1
    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  83. Which Distro by Frihet · · Score: 1

    I tried Ubuntu on my 701 -- could not get wireless to work. Then I went to Mandriva spring 2008. Everything worked perfectly.

  84. you could try..... by TriaxilateWho · · Score: 1

    I have recently taken off the Xandros distro on my eee 701 and replaced with an Ubuntu derivative called Crunchee. Its based upon a more generic Ubuntu distro called CrunchBangLinux. It is very lean and minimal - so wrong end of the spectrum for someone who likes Vista then

  85. Just install Jaunty by ResQuad · · Score: 1

    I am writing this post on an Eee PC 1000 that arrived yesterday. It is running Jaunty Netbook Remix. Everything (for me) worked "out of the box" in Jaunty, even web cam and wireless. Just because it is in Alpha doesnt mean it cant be used. The one down side is that it is the i386 build and no LPIA, but I can live with that till it goes live in April.

    1. Re:Just install Jaunty by cide · · Score: 1

      There is an issue I've seen with the wifi driver included in 2.6.28 and jaunty on the EeePC 901 and higher.

      The module rt2860sta v1.8.0.0 has very poor WPA/WPA2 support. Your wifi is working probably because you connect to a WEP network.

      I have a patch for this available for 2.6.29, but it will also soon be available on the array.org/ubuntu kernel.

      (I'm working on a jaunty netbook kernel which will address this WPA/WPA2 issue, too)

    2. Re:Just install Jaunty by cide · · Score: 1

      For anyone interested, here's the patch that fixes WPA/WPA2 on 2.6.29-rc6... but it will work on 2.6.28 and later.

      http://git.array.org/?p=kernel/stable/linux-2.6-stable.git;a=commit;h=ee8834f5551943b7bd2db49bbad9ba3c24ce6f67

      (pending upstream inclusion)

  86. Wow by DerCed · · Score: 1

    Congratulations to the Easy Peasy project (http://www.geteasypeasy.com/). :-/

    The distro has been called Ubuntu EEE before they were contacted by Canonical requesting them to change the name. Their suggestion was "Ubuntu for EEE" or something along the lines. But the maintainer of Ubuntu EEE thought it would be nice to call the distro "Easy Peasy" a completely unrelated, silly name that noone will ever recognize as an operating system.
    This Slashdot question is a symptom of this very bad choice of project name.

  87. Debian (Lenny) does really well by aedil · · Score: 1

    You may want to check out Debian, especially now Lenny has been released as Debian 5.0. It includes a decent amount of work from the DebianEeePC team (http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEeePC), and runs nicely. Like all distributions, there are a few rough edges for some Eee PC models (due to hardware differences and less-than-ideal drivers being available).

    In the end, it will probably depend largely on what people are used to in terms of Linux distributions. But if you like Debian and Debian-derivatives, I would certainly recommend taking a look at Debian.

    It is also important to note that the DebianEeePC project has a very active developer and user community that is more than happy to help out both newbies and more experienced users.

  88. Check out CrunchEEE by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen it posted yet so far, but the couple times I've used it it was pretty nice. I don't personally own an EEE so I can't say much more than to look into it.

    --
    http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    1. Re:Check out CrunchEEE by mackloud · · Score: 1

      I've got cruncheee installed on my 701 and it's a very good fit. I'm quite happy with it.

    2. Re:Check out CrunchEEE by pithed · · Score: 1

      I have crunchee on my 1000ha and like it alot. Most things worked out of the box with only a bit of fiddling (wireless). It is a really light weight distro but is not for everyone as it uses openbox window manager so it really shines on netbooks with limited resources.

      http://crunchbanglinux.org/blog/2008/12/26/cruncheee-81001-release-candidate-1/

      I was just at a conference and the people seated around me saw the crunchee install and it generated alot of oohs and aahs.

      MC

  89. Fedora 10 will work flawlessly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fedora 10 will work fine. On a EEE PC 900A, all devices work perfectly right out of the box. This includes wireless, video, and sound, any one of which has posed issues in the past with various systems.

    If you are running a SSD, I highly recommend you use tmpfs where you can (for /tmp, for instance) and otherwise tune things as well as possible to work with it.

  90. Why? by darthservo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I realize that there is some intent of humor behind the post, but really why would it be so hard to believe that someone actually gave Vista a serious look as opposed to having a blog-formed bias against it before using it? Yes, XP is not "giant piece of crap" but Vista is better.

    Sorry, I'm just tired of hearing crap flung against Vista when people don't give it a serious look. I look forward to Windows 7 for somewhat similar reasons as the Vista-haters - we won't hear any more about Vista. But the difference is that I'm hoping it will take the bias away as well.

    --

    Prove it.

    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blog-formed!?

      I'm sorry, but using Vista for 5 minutes is all it takes to form a negative opinion.

      Aero is not THAT good - it really isn't. Actually, I kind of think the interface is sort of ugly.

      What the fuck did they do to Windows Explorer? Such an unsightly pile of crap.

      Stability - pfft - didn't notice that at all. Most users Vista installs seems to have more problems, because they don't understand UAC, and end up fubaring half their applications.

      Microsoft still hasn't solved the malware problem. Windows Defender just doesn't do it's job.

      Crap crap and crap.

      All they've done is created an OS that creates more headaches for people who need to fix this shit.

  91. #! Crunch Bang Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have had alot of luck with Crunch Bang Linux if you like minimalist setup. They have a version for Eeepc called CrunchEee that I have used on a 1000h and it works fantastic. Webcam works, wireless works, bluetooth works. It uses openbox as its default wm and also comes with dwm if you like tiling. http://crunchbanglinux.org/

  92. Re:Ubuntu - Easy Peasy by Repugnant_Shit · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have the Asus 1000 (solid state drive) and use Easy Peasy (I think www.geteasypeasy.com). It works well with suspend/lid closing/wifi. I don't know if this is typical, but it even worked correctly with my Verizon Wireless EVDO aircard, so I'm happy.

  93. CrunchEee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CrunchEee version of Crunchbang Linux.

    http://crunchbanglinux.org/ and very friendly, helpful forums: http://crunchbanglinux.org/forums/

    Ubuntu based, uses openbox and other alternatives for a lighter, faster OS experience.

  94. Abandon all hope by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you truly prefer Vista to XP, then the only course of action I can recommend for you is euthanasia.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Abandon all hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please read the original comment carefully.

      "...but XP is such a giant piece of crap on here...".

      It is clear that Timothy means that Windows XP does not work well on the Eee PC 1000HD. Nowhere does he write that he prefers Vista to XP.

      And even if Timothy does prefer Vista to XP (which, again is NOT the intention of that sentence), he is asking which LINUX distro to use! So, please try to be nice and tell him to use Ubuntu or something.

    2. Re:Abandon all hope by timothy · · Score: 1

      Sorry, those words aren't mine -- they're those of the question's (anonymous) submitter.

      On my own Eee, XP didn't last longer than it took to install a few versions of Ubuntu; right now I have 8.10 on there, and find it mostly works, but the glitches can be pretty bothersome. In particular, I find that wireless connections are buggy, even though the wireless *reception* is excellent. (Far better than that of any of the handful of other laptops I have around.)

      I have seen Vista casually, just shoulder surfing, haven't used it very much to form an opinion one way or the other; from screenshots etc, I'd say I like the look of it better than I like the look of Windows XP. But really, I don't have enough patience for Windows, and I'd like my computers to run free operating systems unless there's some particular good reason (particularly good to me) otherwise.

      timothy

      --
      jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  95. FluxFlux? by kanazir · · Score: 1
  96. Debian!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Debian is great for my 1000HD (which is what you're buying). I installed from a bootable USB stick using 'debootstrap' to fill the base filesystem (not for the casual linux user). I then encrypted my entire root and all using cryptsetup luks.

    There is no need for self-compiled code or patches, everything is available via apt and the latest kernels. DO NOT USE A "CUSTOM" EEE distro.

    # for the wireless:
    sudo m-a a-b rt2860 ; sudo dpkg -i rt2860...
    The module is called "rt2860sta"

    # For the webcam
    use the module "uvcvideo"

    # For the ethernet "atl1e"

    I chose debian over ubuntu because I don't want eye-candy slowing things down. (Yes I'm sure you can disable all that junk in ubuntu but I'm so familiar to debian)

    Oh one more thing, run mplayer with -cache 8192 to avoid any choppiness or sound skipping reading from encrypted drives while multitasking.

  97. Two Words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ARCH LINUX. I am using arch on my eeepc 900A. If you don't mind the command line based setup, it is the way to go. Its fast, light, and supports most of the hardware with the stock kernel.

  98. Just go with the standard distro. by blind+biker · · Score: 1

    That would be Xandros Linux for the Eee PC. Reason: as maligned as it seems to be, it still is the one that supports the 1000H's hardware the best.

    I myself use Slax, because I have the time to tweak it, and because I don't have a HD in my Eee PC (only 4GB of SSD), and do believe that for the "smaller" Eee PCs is the absolute best out there, but if I was a novice AND I had a 1000H or 1000HD, it'd go with what Asus prepared for it.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  99. On a 701 by eoin_tbo · · Score: 1

    I've used the default Xandros os and ubuntueee but for the last few month or so I've been using a CrunchBang EEE specific distro and I've been very happy with it. Works out of the box with all drivers present and reduced font size for those itty bitty screens. http://crunchbanglinux.org/forums/topic/424/cruncheee-81001-release-candidate-1/

  100. Re:don't want to sound elitist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "You just speak for judgmental, obnoxious pricks that believe the world should operate only according to their narrow-minded rules."

    Like he said, he speaks for all of slashdot.

  101. Hate to break it to you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but the only thing that makes all these flavor's of Ubuntu worthy of extra e's is adam's kernel.

    http://www.array.org/ubuntu/

    Not perfect hardware support (especially on my 901) but it's as good as it gets for now. My stock XandrOS install was a disaster. Bad hardware support and the package manager/update utility was broken. On the other hand, it did have a "too convenient" shortcut key for switching to Chinese characters.

    For the record, I'm running the full Crunchbang distro with the custom kernel. It actually puts the window/home key to good use!

  102. Anti MS rant here by genner · · Score: 1

    You said nice things about Vista......and you think you can just walk away.

  103. File System and Wireless by ouder · · Score: 1

    You have a flash hard drive in the eee, so I would suggest using an ext2 or other non-journaling file system. Depending on how you use swap files you might also want to reduce the swappiness (I would be more specific, but discussions of swap space always precipitate flame wars). Wireless is the place you are most likely to run into support problems. The problems are resolvable, but it is still the area you are most likely to have headaches.

  104. eee multi-touch support? by chappel · · Score: 1

    Have the driver issues for the full set of multi-touch features on the eeePC touchpad been worked out yet? I recall seeing a post somewhere that the full functionality was only available under windows.

  105. Slackware, of course by metageek · · Score: 0

    Slackware 12.2, kernel 2.6.28, KDE. But I do have an 8Gb 701 (actually known as 702), the extra space was very useful for KDE, otherwise with a standard 4Gb 701 you're better off using XFCE instead of KDE.

    more on http://slackeee.strangled.net/

    --
    metageek
  106. I do own an eeepc... by gillbates · · Score: 1

    And Xandros works just fine for me. There are a few quirks to getting KDE installed, but as for the rest of the packages, you can't beat apt-get.

    The advantage of the Xandros distro is that it already supports the EEE hardware, and whatever else you find lacking can be made up with apt-get. Of course, it didn't ship with KDE, gcc, gThumb, etc..., but finding and installing the software was fairly trivial.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
  107. Mandriva by Idou · · Score: 1

    It was easy to install and all the hardware runs fine without tweaking. However, just a couple caveats:

    -the "Control Panel" (drakconf) is sometimes too big (eeepc has same issue with programs like Skype) -Don't think it automatically sleeps when shut (I think fn + Esc works, though)

    To increase performance, you can try other window managers (Mandriva makes it pretty easy to try other WM). Just 2 cents from someone who has actually installed a different distro on their eeepc . . .

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  108. Re:I'm sorry to the reality-hater by cromar · · Score: 1

    Psst. It's OK. Not everybody has to agree with your views. Part of free speech is being told to shut up sometimes. Now, if the gov't is silencing you by force, that's a different matter.

  109. You can do that yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hotplugging can overload /usr on insertion of the right USB stick with the right label when formatting it.

    Do it yourself. It's your dream and you can live it yourself.

    1. Re:You can do that yourself by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

      Do it yourself. It's your dream and you can live it yourself.

      Sigh, I *know* both that I can do it myself and how to do it.

      It would be nice to recommend something *I* didn't need to setup for someone.

  110. If you like vista so much.. by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    just go ahead and put vista on it.
    I tihnk you're crazy but its a free world.

  111. Puppy by senorpoco · · Score: 1

    I don't know about the colonies but here in the UK the EEE originally shipped with puppylinux. :D

  112. EasyPeasy by headonfire · · Score: 1

    For what it's worth, I put eee-ubuntu (which has now been renamed to "EasyPeasy", I guess) on my asus 900 and it runs pretty well. From the other options I looked at, none really seemed any better; and EP had the advantage of having a very easy install.

    This may have changed in the past 4-5 months but so far it's best option I've found, particularly for something that worked out of the box pretty much from the get-go (barring a one-line change to fstab to get the SDcard slot working, and that might be fixed now, I dunno).

  113. Re:don't want to sound elitist by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

    Damn - wish I had mod points. Problem would be to decide between 'funny' and 'insightful'...

  114. Vanilla Ubuntu + Adamm's kernel by lolocaust · · Score: 3, Informative

    On my eeePC 901, I'm using the standard Ubuntu 8.10 install and then using a wired connection I have installed Adamm's kernel which fixes all the hardware issues. The instructions are simple to follow and are available at http://array.org/ubuntu/ (if you can use apt-get you can follow these instructions).

    --
    Why does my post history abruptly stop? I want to laugh at the stupid things I posted as a kid.
    1. Re:Vanilla Ubuntu + Adamm's kernel by Anneco · · Score: 1

      Seconded that. Stick to vanilla Ubunbtu + Adams kernel and eee-control for the function keys

    2. Re:Vanilla Ubuntu + Adamm's kernel by cide · · Score: 1

      I totally agree.

      Even though Ubuntu-Eee, Easy Peasy, Eeebuntu and others all sell themselves as a EeePC-specific distro, what makes them support this is the eeepc kernel itself.

      It handles the wireless, wired, FSB modules, and other misc kernel enhancements in one fell swoop.

      In other words, it is possible (and I personally recommend it) that you install Stock ubuntu then throw on the eeepc kernel afterwords.

      After all, I wrote it :D

      -- Adam McDaniel

    3. Re:Vanilla Ubuntu + Adamm's kernel by don.g · · Score: 3, Informative

      Thirded! Most (all?) rehashes of Ubuntu for the Eee break things in fundamental ways, such that things like upgrading the kernel break your machine. The array.org method does things the right way (proper packages, proper repository), and things don't break.

      --
      Pretend that something especially witty is here. Thanks.
    4. Re:Vanilla Ubuntu + Adamm's kernel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eeebuntu uses the Array kernel and also has a set of repos of their own. Pretty sweet.

  115. Sidux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have no experience with the "E", but I think Sidux handles it all well, especially I see some "eee" modules and scripts in the repositories.

  116. Easy Peasy distro by Temposs · · Score: 1

    Easy Peasy is the rebranding of Ubuntu-eee and uses Ubuntu 8.10 as its upstream. So it's the next version up from the Ubuntu-eee that others have mentioned. It works great on my wife's eeePC 1000.

    http://www.geteasypeasy.com/

    --
    Knowledge is just opinion that you trust enough to act upon. -Orson Scott Card
  117. Fedora by shywolf9982 · · Score: 1

    I'm typing this from my 901 running Fedora 9.

    It does not work (completely) out of the box; the things that you need to tweak are the following:

    Boot Fedora from USB, by downloading any live iso (or the netinstall if you are short on space) and following http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraLiveCD/USBHowTo (or the relevant page in the manual: I'm frankly more happy with the manual)

    Install the whole thing (SSD users might want to check out Theodore T'so blog on how to correctly format an SSD to have semi-decent performances)

    See that it works "sort of"

    Check out http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Eee_PC. It does not have all the solutions but has valid pointers for googling.

    The GMA950 is going to be a pain as usual, so if you plan to run compiz like I do you should google for optimizations of the driver.
    It mostly boils down to inserting
    Option "MigrationHeuristics" "greedy"
    in the Device section of /etc/X11/xorg.conf but this might be outdated information.

    However, this is to improve performances, the stuff will work (just slow, and compiz can REALLY slow down apps like Firefox)

    --
    nbody2002:If you can read this you may be addicted to the internet
  118. Crunchbang #! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Crunchbang makes an EEE version. Their standard version works great on my P3 600MHz fujitsu

  119. Leopard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OS X?

  120. Stock Ubuntu + Ubuntu Eee Kernel by LuYu · · Score: 1

    I am currently composing this on an Eee901 with Intrepid. On the #ubuntu channel at irc.freenode.net, they told me to add the repository for Ubuntu Eee which essentially only offers an Eee kernel and modules (with all the proprietary drivers -- yes, I know, yuck, but they are supposed to be replaced with Free Software soon).

    The repo is:

    deb http://www.array.org/ubuntu intrepid eeepc

    Everything works, and you do not have to deal with that silly Ubuntu mobile interface. If you download EeeControl from the standard Ubuntu repos, you will be able to switch on and off the Wifi, Bluetooth, camera, and SD card reader. You will also be able to set the processor as with Asus' "super hybrid engine".

    I have been using this setup for more than two months and find it is very responsive. It is easy to set up, too. Just make sure you always keep Grub pointing to the Eee kernel.

    --
    All data is speech. All speech is Free.
  121. Stick with XP by Anonymous+Showered · · Score: 1, Informative

    Stick with XP and just turn off the visual effects, unnecessary services (Indexing, BITS, Security Center, etc.) and see the machine fly. There are countless guides on the web that tell you which ones to disable.

  122. Vista / XP who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about Vista and I don't care.
    I have seen XP it is not the way.

    Please give me back 2000!

  123. Guess you didn't use Windows 2000 by blahbooboo · · Score: 1

    ..but I've been using XP for 7 years now, and it's far from being crap. It's the most stable OS I've ever used, second only to the Mac OS.

    Guess you never used Windows 2000?
    That is still by far the best OS ever made by MS. It was stable, fast, not bloatware. Everything an OS should be, which is enable applications to run well and not try to replace things at the OS level which should be separate applications.

    If it wasn't for the superior USB support in XP (which MS could easily have added to Win2k) I would never have upgraded.

    1. Re:Guess you didn't use Windows 2000 by peterpi · · Score: 1

      Seconded. I miss Win2K :(

  124. #! Cruncheee - Hands down. by ZaxxonX · · Score: 1

    I am running #! Cruncheee on my 901 since quite some time now after trying a multitude of distributions. It has for my taste the right apps, the right theme, concentrates on getting things done, is rock stable, supports all eee hardware out of the box and does all of that at lightning speed. Another nice thing is that it is an ubuntu based distro, so you get the benefit of excellent packages, etc. The live CD, which also installs once booted, can be had at http://crunchbanglinux.org/ in the download section, and even from the live CD (ok, more likely the live-USB-stick) it already runs very fast!

    --
    Reality is just a bunch of illusion...
  125. Don't waste your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Test out Win7 on it. No sense wasting valuable time playing with Jaundiced Jackoff or whatever that polished turd is called this week.

    Teh Lunix will always let you down. There are many reasons it has a bit above a 1% market share.

  126. Netbook OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I recently bought a Samsung NC-10 to replace a Panasonic toughbook for field use. It became necessary when I tried to scramble out the door on an emergency call with a 73 pound toolbag and got a back injury for my trouble. After a crash diet, the bag weighs 19 pounds. The point is that this netbook is not a starbucks commuter. It's heavily used in a gritty production environment... something the Samsung engineers would certainly call "non-ideal" as they twitched.

    The office has standardized on Fedora10 on the desktop, and CentOS on the servers. The netbook came with XP home on it with two partitions already on the 160GB hard disk. One small adjustment in the stock setup menu, and I have an adequate XP partition and a blank 100GB partition. When installing Linux, or any OS for that matter, on a Laptop, I expect driver issues and I thought a netbook would be worse because of the integration. Without a CD or DVD drive, it's necessary to install using a flash drive. It's relatively easy to install a Fedora10 boot img on a flash drive if you RTFM.

    Pop the USB drive in, punch the power button, enter the BIOS, set to boot from USB, reboot. Now for the hard part right?

    Everything just worked. You read that right. Everything. Period. No setup other than the standard run through the menus, which I completed in a vehicle driving through the middle of nowhere with no internet access. It's almost like Samsung designed the NC10 with Linux in mind.

    The only areas where I rolled up my sleeves and used the CLI was for the MP3 and DVD playback, stuff typical of Fedora / Redhat, and setting up some of the proprietory security for the office. These were things I had to do for every machine.

    The only gotchas were some of the menus extend beyond the short screens. I am adjusting those as I come across them. They work fine in the office connected to an external monitor, mouse and keyboard.

    Your mileage will vary. This is what worked for me. My back is happier, and I am able to move quickly and efficiently, though the back of my brain still thinks I left most of the tools behind. I'll get used to it, just like I'll get used to the delete key placement... eventually.

  127. Crunchbang Linux by jaspeers · · Score: 1

    It's just Ubuntu with OpenBox / lxpanel and lightweight software, but that combination leaves you with lots of screen real estate. Everything works out of the box for me. The dark default theme isn't for everyone, and you can probably brew your own Ubuntu to do the same thing, but it's worked for me on my 1000hd.

  128. Re:don't want to sound elitist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Standard answer would have been "New here?". In that case I'd have gone for 'redundant'. (wish I had mod points too but they require an account for that)

  129. right... by bolosmith · · Score: 1

    "I can't stand XP. I know it's odd, because I actually like Vista, but XP is such a giant piece of crap..." Sounds like trolling from a MS VISTA developer or marketing guy... I know of no one who actually uses a UMPC that would prefer VISTA... -bob

  130. Pupeee by Ken_g6 · · Score: 1

    Apparently, there is a version of Puppy for the Eee, naturally called Pupeee!

    --
    (T>t && O(n)--) == sqrt(666)
  131. Re:Fedora 9 - correction by HappyHead · · Score: 1

    Sorry, just checked the actual machine and it's Fedora 10 that worked fine out of box. Fedora 9 did have a problem with the wireless drivers, but everything else worked fine. Instructions here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EeePc for putting fedora on your Eee

  132. Well. by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

    Good question. I've got a eee 701SD and Ive had the same problem.

    Instead of dealing with eeeBuntu and its ilk, I went on and put on Jaunty. After downloading the r8780 driver source and using module assistant to compile, it works like a charm. I also used the alternate cd so I could get full disk encryption, which was my biggie requirement.

    And after 9.4 has been "released", it will also support lots of 'cloud based' things, so the small storage will be no big deal at all.

    --
  133. Thought about Windows 7? by SuperAndy · · Score: 1

    I am probably going to get shot down here for even suggesting such a thing, but a good friend of mine has an eeePC, and, after trying various linux distros, and XP, actually found that Windows 7 worked impressively well. He had to use Vlite, or whatever the Windows 7 equivalent is, to strip it back so it would fit on the highspeed SSD chip, as opposed to the larger drive, but apart from that, its fantastic. I have had a play with it myself, everything works, and there are no compatibility issues, it seems to be rock solid. And comparable in speed to XP. Certainly its ability to go to sleep and wake up is very snappy indeed. So yea, don't necessary get hung up on Linux, give Windows 7 a go!

  134. Default EEE Linux install by kingduct · · Score: 1

    I know this doesn't respond completely to the question, but I really recommend the default install that comes with the EEE Linux model. I got the EEE because I knew that I didn't like Windows and that I didn't like fussing with installing Linux on a laptop. It works great, it's very very very fast, it uses IceWM (which I have always liked), it is easy to configure (by editing a simple text file), and it is Debian based, which allows for easy software installation. The only significant negative is that it is based on a fairly old Debian, meaning that the default repositories are a bit outdated in their software.

    Furthermore, it meant that I was encouraging a manufacturer to sell Linux pre-installed. I literally put my money where my mouth was. Now, it is too late for you to do that, so I recommend you go to the eeeuser.com forums, where you will find fairly knowledgable forum support for your question. Best of luck.

  135. Ubuntu 8.10 + Array linux-eeepc Custom Kernel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have the 1000H and using Ubuntu 8.10 and the linux-eeepc custom kernel from array.org. Works perfectly, including hot keys.

    http://www.array.org/ubuntu/setup-intrepid.html

  136. FreeBSD by sremick · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not bad for a "dead" OS:

    http://wiki.freebsd.org/AsusEee

  137. No Linux would work out of the box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Weird that the stock Xandros Linux that comes out of the box with an Eee PC just works. You would think that because it's not Linux That You Have To Install By Yourself While Complaining About How Much Better Than Windows It Is Oh By The Way See How Big MY Penis Is it would cause carbuncles to burst forth across your eyeballs, but instead it works out of the box.

    It's not fair. Linux is supposed to be hard.

  138. Cruncheee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cruncheee is derived from ubuntu and pretty cool. I'm running it for a couple of days now and it is the best option i've found so far for my eee.

    http://crunchbanglinux.org/

  139. Easy-Peasy on 700 series by phorm · · Score: 1

    I've got a 700 series and have been using Easy Peasy, which is a successor to Ubuntu-EEE (one of the other Ubuntu-derived distros). Despite the lame name, it's a fairly nice Ubuntu-derivative. My main complaint about it is that it tries to maximize almost everything, and sometimes does so to my dialog windows etc (I'm sure there's a setting to turn that off, but I haven't found where yet).

    Other than that, overhead is fairly low and it's easy to navigate.

  140. I've installed Ubuntu on four EeePC 1000's... by seandiggity · · Score: 1

    ...and I think it's best to go with Eeebuntu and then just get rid of the cruft from the initial install. There are a lot of things I don't like about the choices in Eeebuntu (an MSN client by default, really?!) but out-of-the-box it offers scripts to fix known bugs/hardware problems with your model of the eeepc, the kernel customized for your eeepc, plus the netbook-launcher if you want it. I tried Ubuntu Eee back in September, but it wasn't as well-polished as Eeebuntu back then. Maybe it is now that it's EasyPeasy.

    You can also go with a vanilla Ubuntu install and make all these tweaks yourself...I was an "early adopter" of the Eee PC 1000, so I can vouch that there's plenty of info out there on the inets if you plan to take that route.

    --
    Geeks like to think that they can ignore politics, you can leave politics alone, but politics won't leave you alone.-rms
  141. Cruncheee full driver support by psykotrol · · Score: 1

    I have a 900sd, and through a lot of googling, I came across Crunchbang linux, which is very minimalist and runs default on openbox. You can of course change this relatively easily to gnome or kde or whatever you prefer. I highly recommend Cruncheee because its very fast compared to the default Xandros installation, or the Ubuntueee installation (now called Easy Peasy). Cruncheee comes with pretty much complete driver support right after installation. Wireless worked right after installation, so did microphone, so did SD slot support, and based on the reports Ive seen, so would the webcam (if I had one, but instead it has a plastic covering? wtf?). Ive used this distro pretty much since the beginning I got the netbook, and am very pleased with it. It even comes with PCman as a file manager. The only gripe I have is that I got a crappy eee pc (for christmas, cant complain). It was supposed to have a webcam, doesnt. Was supposed to have an 8gb harddrive, instead it has a 4 gb harddrive. I actually have more space available in my sd slot than on my freakin internal harddrive. It doesnt even have an Atom processor like the rest, it has Celeron. So im selling it and getting the 1000 instead, lol.

  142. CrunchBang Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://crunchbanglinux.org/ has an eee variant: cruncheee. http://crunchbanglinux.org/blog/2008/12/26/cruncheee-81001-release-candidate-1/

    Supposed to be the duck's nuts.

  143. Dual boot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With 2 different distros - I've got the exact same model, and use stock Fedora 10 and eeeBuntu. On both WiFi works a treat with my WPA2 router.
    I've also got Audacity and Ardour (both multi-track recording software), and can happily place the EEE in the corner of the studio and using the built-in stereo microphones record a passable quality 3-hour practice session. With windows installed, I'd have to fork out at least twice the price for this sort of functionality.

  144. FREEEEE by nijk · · Score: 1

    There is a distro called Freeeee for the eee pc, made by jaromil of rastasoft. It's really cool and plays a guitar solo as it's starting up. That's the kind of thing a linux distro should provide!

    http://freeeee.org/ seems to be down, but you can get the latest images here:
    ftp://therion.noldrin.com/pub/freeeee/

    1. Re:FREEEEE by jaromil · · Score: 1

      Actually FREEEEE was done by BLAG's developer Jebba, i guess the guitar piece is something he play with friends in his garage :)

      We were highly enthusiastic about this device since the early beginning, FREEEEE was born with the intention to deploy the linux-libre kernel on the device

      FREEEEE currently works with BLAG and Fedora-9 packages (I'm using it on my 900 eee), but is not actively mantained as we don't have so much time for it. Also the website is down.. yes we know :) all the scripts written ad-hoc are hosted on git.dyne.org/freeeee.git.

      ciao

  145. Array.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Standard Ubuntu with the Array.org drivers/scripts/kernel has resulted in a pretty much perfect version of Ubuntu with everything working for on my new EEE1000H.

    I tried EasyPeasy and EeeBuntu but they were too childish for me. I wanted to replicated the standard Gnome desktop on my main machine, and the EEE1000 is buff enough to run such a desktop without trouble.

    Wireless works great, auto-connecting to various networks at home and work. I don't walk between different networks though.

  146. ath5k wireless drivers on 8.10's array kernel by cide · · Score: 1

    With my 900, i've had no issues using the ath5k drivers compared to the ndiswrapper method or the older madwifi drivers.

    I've posted an update to the repository from the upstream ath5k developers. This is currently available as 2.6.27-11-eeepc

    You may install this version by hand to test, as its not being pushed out automatically yet.

    $ sudo apt-get install linux-image-2.6.27-11-eeepc

    -Adam

    1. Re:ath5k wireless drivers on 8.10's array kernel by ultrabot · · Score: 1

      With my 900, i've had no issues using the ath5k drivers compared to the ndiswrapper method or the older madwifi drivers.

      I've posted an update to the repository from the upstream ath5k developers. This is currently available as 2.6.27-11-eeepc

      You may install this version by hand to test, as its not being pushed out automatically yet.

      $ sudo apt-get install linux-image-2.6.27-11-eeepc

      -Adam

      Belated response:

      I tried your updated kernel, but still had connection problems on ath5k. Overall performance of the computer was better than with ndiswrapper, but wlan was again very slow. I reverted back to ndiswrapper (with the new kernel though).

      --
      Save your wrists today - switch to Dvorak
  147. I'm glad you asked! by malevolentjelly · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, I've been fooling with a much smaller and lower-end Eee over the last week or so (the $200 900a), and I'm just brimming with nasty experiences to share.

    First and foremost- if you are a fan of Windows and your Eee has a non-SSD HDD, you really need to be using Windows 7. They are still passing out serial numbers and the disk images themselves are easy to find on bittorrent sites. It's honestly fantastic. Everything you like about Vista is just better in Windows 7 and most of what you didn't like is gone- plus the performance, damn.

    Second, let's talk linux: running Linux on the EeePC is a real Monkey's paw sort of experience. With every upside is a cruel and awful downside-- and such. For instance, you can run Ubuntu Netbook Remix which uses Intel's LPIA architecture instead of i386-- that's really cool because it does a lot of static scheduling (I believe) and SSE3 optimization that is really great for the Atom processor... but it's not going to support you hardware perfectly. It's an OEM product so no time has been devoted to working out issues with the Asus ACPI. Basically, you're supposed to be paying Canonical for a working branded experience like HP and Dell did... unless you feel like doing the work yourself.

    Easy Peasy 1.0 has all the hardware support down, but once more you're going to be running Ubuntu Netbook Remix's interface. I mean, let's face it- The EeePC 1000 is not just a device, it's a full computer. You probably want to treat it like an actual system not a toy. UNR's interface is really attention deficit and designed for serial single-tasking. Besides, I like to stay away from custom spins and stay on the mainline to receive better support and more timely upgrades/security updates. I'd rather not my system's health be dependent on some random stranger's freetime.

    Honestly, you need to look into Mandriva. It's a fantastic and very pretty home distribution with full official support for the EeePC. I would recommend keeping a tiny FreeDOS partition (or usb key) around for bios updates, which come pretty frequently and often work in concert with system updates on Mandriva. You really should try it-- it might be just what you're looking for if you want solid support and to avoid headaches. Furthermore, if you want to get really creative you can always set up a custom system with LXDE-- I can link to a guide if anyone asks.

    Personally, I run Asus Xandros on my machine with unionfs disabled to conserve diskspace (I only have 4 gb!). It's a well adjusted distribution with full support for the ACPI and a great CPU frequency profile. Also, it comes with all the codecs you'll need and uses all mplayer by default (no gstreamer, no pulseaudio-- simple and practical). The only downside (on the 900a) is that the touchpad's tap functionality is just awful when using the elantech X driver. I am not sure if it would be the same case on a 1000. If you want the Xandros distribution, you can probably torrent it- it doesn't use CD keys or anything.

    Alternatively, you could also try HP's MIE image (Mobile Internet Experience). It's pretty close to an Eee 1000, so just get the support tool from HP that's designed to make a "recovery image" for you and just "recover" your EeePC. That's a custom spin of UNR + software and codecs-- not a bad way to go.

    So, in conclusion:

    1. Windows 7 (as supported as Vista)
    2. Xandros (if you have it) (fully supported)
    3. Mandriva 2009.0 (Gnome) (fully supported)
    4. HP MIE (possibly supported)
    5. Ubuntu Netbook Remix (partially supported)
    6. Easy Peasy 1.0 (fully supported but crappy)

    And there ya go.

    1. Re:I'm glad you asked! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to respectfully disagree with your assessment on UbuntuEEE/Easy Peasy and the netbook remix. I think they've really found the best way to maximize the usable space of a small screen. The CLI is still there in full effect, you can still run multiple applications. The only real difference is that you can't have two applications opened side-by-side, and on a 7-9 inch screen why the hell would you want to?

      My install worked out of the box and I've got access to the Ubuntu software repositories, which are huge and well supported by the community. Nautilus is still there so GUI access to the filesystem is top notch. I don't really think it's fair to rank this distro last because you're of the opinion that netbook remix looks like a toy.

    2. Re:I'm glad you asked! by malevolentjelly · · Score: 1

      I don't really think it's fair to rank this distro last because you're of the opinion that netbook remix looks like a toy.

      I was only looking at "good" systems to run on an EeePC. I could have included a bunch of other distros and then Ubuntu would be *almost* at the top. The point is that Windows 7, default Xandros, and HP MIE have more features and commercial supported (aka popular) applications out of the box. Mandriva has the benefit of being officially supported on the EeePC- that's certainly worth something.

      For instance, both Windows 7 and the Xandros installation come with all the codecs you'll need to screw with media in the modern world- a great feature. Also, with the UNR and its LPIA architecture, you can install third party i386 packages like Opera, but it confuses apt so it recommends the removal of its dependencies from then on out. And I can tell you from experience that running firefox on an EeePC 900a is a fool's errand. It's slow as molasses-- you really need something like Opera to get a smooth web experience. Sure I could repackage it as LPIA... but do I really want to? This is just one example of a non-LPIA application.

      In order to get Ubuntu to the point where my EeePC would sleep and wake properly, I had to do some work. In fact, it was more work than removing aufs from my Xandros installation. Now that's just sad. Canonical just doesn't seem committed to supporting Asus hardware properly unless they receive a big fat contract and branding agreement from Asus like with HP and Dell. I will be thrilled to use it if they do.

      I didn't bother going over EasyPeasy much because the Original Poster specifically said he didn't like the UNR interface (including Ubuntu-EEE), so it was a waste. I honestly just avoid it because I don't like amateur third party versions of what I see as an already somewhat amateur operating system experience. The least I can do is get something custom tailored and supported for what I am running-- by people who get paid to do that. I would hate to think what would happen if the people doing the Easy Peasy distribution lost interest while I grew dependent on it.

  148. Crunchbang by GoatSucker · · Score: 1

    I've been using the eee version of Crunchbang. http://crunchbanglinux.org/blog/2009/01/18/crunchbang-linux-81002-released/ Works flawlessly with full driver support, is very fast, and isn't brown.

  149. for you? Xandros by ffflala · · Score: 1

    I agree that the battery life and response is poor on an EeePC 1000 with Ubuntu or its EeePC-specific derivatives.

    I think you can get the best perfomance out of it with Gentoo and XFCE, but for your needs Xandros, the default EeePC Linux distro, might be best. I was skeptical about Xandros when I picked up my EeePC 1000 a few months ago, but gave it a fair chance.

    Really its biggest general drawback is the Candyland-like interface and this is modified easily enough. Xandros has a great advantage in that it integrates well with the firmware, and you'll almost certainly get better battery life and response from it than you have w/ Ubuntu-eee.

    I'd might even have stuck with Xandros, except for its lack of 802.1x wireless support. For me that was a showstopper, and despite my best efforts I was unable to get WPAsupplicant to work. So if you don't need 802.1x, give Xandros a try.

  150. Crunchbang Linux. by refactored · · Score: 1

    I'm using Crunchbang Linux on my EEE 901.

    The user interface is "house key"+key press rather than fat icon oriented. It's slim (not lots of cruft), based on Ubuntu Intrepid so you can pull in anything you need, uses array.org kernel, has eee configuration applet. Works for me.

  151. my experience with 1000HA and linux: perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just got an Asus EeePC 1000HA and installed Slackware 12.2 on it with PXE booting.

    *Everything* *just* *works*.

    The wireless, the webcam, the hardware-accelerated graphics, hell even the touchpad just works. Everything is supported, I didn't have to touch a thing. No recompiling. No upgrading. No patching.

    Note that this isn't the same as a 1000HD, but if you use the newest distro you can find it should have excellent support for these laptops. (Distros with kernel 2.6.27 or higher are probably the most likely to work, as that and 2.6.28 adds some drivers into the main tree which may be required)

    Also I dual-boot the native XP and slack on this laptop, and both are very fast. I have no problems with the XP Home install that came with the lappy, other than its lack of support for WPA-Enterprise.

    Get more help at http://forum.eeeuser.com/

  152. Debian or Ubuntu by hydrofix · · Score: 1

    The question boils down to wether you like Debian or Ubuntu more. I like Debian, and now with the release of Lenny, I see it's one of the officially supported sub-architectures.

    http://debian-eeepc.alioth.debian.org/
      http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEeePC

  153. Arch Linux by clarkritz · · Score: 1

    I was an early adopter with an eee pc 701. I've tried xandros, xubunt 7.10, ubuntu 8.04, and ubuntueee (also 8.04-based I think). I currently use Arch Linux (www.archlinux.org). Arch is not a beginner distro, but it is 'easy' to customize. Hotkeys and wireless work fine with the right modules installed, but I have had trouble getting it to power-off gracefully when the battery is down.

  154. Fedora 10 by hackus · · Score: 1

    EePC 900

    Install works fine.

    Issues:

    The machine hibernates and fails to bring back the wireless card.

    Driver for the wireless that comes with the eePC is OK, but I get better sensitivity from the driver here:

    http://wireless.kernel.org/download/compat-wireless-2.6/compat-wireless-old.tar.bz2

    Pretty simple....just unpack, make install should work, reboot.

    Fedora 10's network manager is quite good, and is usable for the average joe with the current posted updates.

    Power management works.

    If you do not like the login manager, you can just add a file to the /etc/sysconfig directory called "desktop" and place the following line in there:

    DISPLAYMANAGER=KDE

    (KDE fanbois....:-)

    KDE 4.2 is quite a looker, however, you can't use the special effects options as the machine is just too slow.

    One other thing.

    I put Fedora 10 on the large internal SSD drive on the eePC 900, and left the original partition intact so i can just swap drives in the BIOS and reboot to get the original install.

    The only consequence is that disk access is horrendously slow. Lots of disk lag. So I am sorta considering the idea of putting Fedora on a SD II card (8 Gig) for booting off of.

    I did make a swap partition on the SSD, but the unit has 1 Gig of memory, and never uses it for what I use it for: XMMS, Mozilla, Thunderbird, Mplayer, Kismet, Samba, Portable BGP router.

    Video performance is OK. I watch some movies on it and it works pretty well.

    Also, make sure you get the latest BIOS update as it solves a shutdown problem with the eePC's ACPI.

    The original software install has a easy way to install BIOS updates, so that alone is worth keeping the original install.

    -Hack

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
  155. Gentoo by corychristison · · Score: 1

    Running Gentoo on my MSI Wind U100 (w/ voided-warranty-updated-RAM-and-HDD-goodness)

    Works fine here... although a bit of flakiness with the Wifi driver.

    Queue the "i don't want to waste a week installing my laptop!!" people. Some people like it. The time spent was not bad. Took me a day and a half off-and-on. It's worth it with limited resources. It's almost as snappy as my desktop AMD X2 5200+ w/ 4GB RAM (which is also Gentoo)

    1. Re:Gentoo by NtwoO · · Score: 1

      Using the latest vanilla kernel solves some WiFi problems. It is usually masked.

      --
      ! /* */
  156. Array.org kernel + (Ku|X/u|U)buntu by wytcld · · Score: 1

    While the device support requirements are a bit different from the old 701 I'm running to the more recent Eee's, all will run Ubuntu's variants fine if you install with the customized kernel from array.org. I'm very happy with Xubuntu. Keep in mind that if you boot with a stock kernel, you won't have wireless working - so at a cat5 cable ready if you get stuck at that stage before the array.org kernel's installed.

    There are various enhancements out there for particular models that will give you better support and displays for the function keys, that you can find by checking at eeeuser.com. But you should have a usable system with a stock Ubuntu + array.org kernel.

    --
    "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
  157. Love my Eee PC, Built in Wireless sucks tho.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually.. its my wife's Eee PC.

    XP isn't that bad on it. We ended up buying a Wireless USB key. The wireless card in the unit is very very poor.

    Take this into account when looking at Linux driver support

  158. Eeebuntu by torbensky · · Score: 1

    I recently installed Eeebuntu on my Acer Aspire One (AAO) with no problems so far. I used the NBR install from eebuntu.org. The install process was quite simple and essentially involved using a bootable USB jump drive with the install image on it. So far I am loving the OS change and wouldn't go back to the original Linpus system. The Eeebuntu desktop interface feels much more full-featured and looks nice without losing the simplicity needed to appeal to a general audience. A few notes from my experience: * Wireless on/off indicator LED doesn't work. * The boot time is slower than the original OS: about 15 seconds on the Linpus (the original OS included with AAO) and 35-40 seconds for Eeebuntu. * Wireless worked right away from the default install. * Ext3 filesystem was slow (likely the SSD) so I changed the default filesystem selection from ext3 to ext2. * Tried various optimizations including installing "preload", removing unecessary services such as the print applet, bluetooth daemon, extra VT's etc... So far I am down to 29 seconds (a whopping 1 second improvement. ** My AAO is the one with 1GB memory and the 16GB solid state disk.

  159. Re:don't want to sound elitist by tprime · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why did you feed the troll??

    I am a beginner to intermediate level desktop user of Linux who is getting ready to buy a Samsung NC10 netbook and plan on dual booting it with ubuntu. I am COUNTING on the linux community to help me along the way. From what I have seen, it isn't assholes like the AC who keep linux from getting any traction, it is the overwhelming amount of information out there about the 'alternative' free OS. The linux user community and their willingness to help others is the reason that it is UP to 1.2%

    These cheap netbooks will keep the % going up.

    --
    http://www.tomandemily.com
  160. Nice list of custom distros for the eee pc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://wiki.eeeuser.com/#custom_eee_linux_distros

    Helped me a lot in choosing what distro to go with.

  161. Debian after 3 tries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried 3 distros, with Debian being the 3rd. I think it was a Debian targeted to the eeepc, I forget. I put the installer on a usb flash stick. Everything works great. Had to spend some time finding just the right webcam apps. Wireless works flawlessly. I kept it simple, e.g. icewm, added a 16G flash card to suplement the 4G SSD.

    Something was wrong with the other distros. The Xandros it came with, I couldn't find compatible repositories with the packages I needed. Ubuntu, the wireless wouldn't work. Debian, everything's super cool. I use my eeepc at home more than any other machine, it's just so convenient and easy to have it where I need it.

  162. OpenSuse pwnz Kubuntu/ubuntu by dvoidis · · Score: 1

    I have an eee 900 and the first thing i did when i got it was to install kubuntu 8.04 on it. using the kernel from www.array.org , worked kind of good for like 6 months or so. but i got tired of it. So a few days a go I decided to install OpenSuse 11.1 on it, when i finally got the installer working (from usb) everything worked good, some minor problems with wifi but most works from the start. I got a nice surprise that audio worked trough hibernation (i can suspend and resume while playing a movie etc) which did't work with kubuntu (better audio driver or something). Anyways kde 4.2 desktop with all the fancy 3d stuff works great on my eee and im now a big fan of opensuse ;)

  163. Fixed Formatting: by torbensky · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I must be new here... I fixed the formatting of my previous post.

    I recently installed Eeebuntu on my Acer Aspire One (AAO) with no problems so far. I used the NBR install from eebuntu.org. The install process was quite simple and essentially involved using a bootable USB jump drive with the install image on it. So far I am loving the OS change and wouldn't go back to the original Linpus system. The Eeebuntu desktop interface feels much more full-featured and looks nice without losing the simplicity needed to appeal to a general audience.

    A few notes from my experience:
    * Wireless on/off indicator LED doesn't work.
    * The boot time is slower than the original OS: about 15 seconds on the Linpus (the original OS included with AAO) and 35-40 seconds for Eeebuntu.
    * Wireless worked right away from the default install.
    * The Ext3 filesystem was slow (likely because of the SSD and the unecessary journaling read/writes) so I changed the default filesystem selection from ext3 to ext2.
    * Tried various optimizations including installing "preload", removing unecessary services such as the print applet, bluetooth daemon, extra VT's etc... So far I am down to 29 seconds (a whopping 1 second improvement.

    ** My AAO is the one with 1GB memory and the 16GB solid state disk.

  164. Obligatory by ozbird · · Score: 1

    I use Gentoo on all of my other boxes, so naturally I put it on my new Eee PC 1000H as well (dual boot with the existing XP.) If you're happy with your current distro, why change? That said, I wouldn't recommend this for the faint hearted. The Atheros chipset isn't supported out of the box, so you're offline until you get the current kernel installed on it. I've yet to get proper hardware acceleration out of the Intel 945GME graphics chipset - nor from an Intel 865G chipset at work. If there's an Eee distro that will do this out of the box, I'd seriously consider switching to it.

  165. Re:I've tried a few, I recommend Ubuntu Netbook Re by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

    I've already posted in the thread. Would someone with mod points please mod parent up. I can't see how anyone could see this as trolling.

    --
    Redundancy is good And also good.
  166. Fedora 10 with a Koji Kernel by ga5in · · Score: 1

    I'm happily running Fedora 10 on my Asus Eee PC 1000, the one with the solid state disks. I'm sure you could do the same thing yours. Everything works after installing the latest koji kernel for f10, and the akmod-rt2860 wireless driver. http://idolinux.blogspot.com/2009/02/fedora-10-on-eee-pc-1000.html

  167. PClinuxos 2009 stock distro will support eee by cenc · · Score: 1

    The pclinuxos has several remixs specifically for eee already that I have tried with all driver support built in, but the stock PCLOS 2009 that is about to be released is suppose to support it out of the box.

    It is a livecd distro, that you can also remix to your hearts content. It started as a mandriva spinoff, but has gone way beyond Mandriva for usability, quality, and reliability. None of that after thought throw everything plus the kitchen sink in to the distro just to have more DVD's to ship.

    The pclinuxos.com for more info.

  168. Vista Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vista wasn't Longhorn--it was WinME 2006.

    A good eee distro? Try Pupeee

  169. Lightweight CPUs with good instr. set=Gentoo by NtwoO · · Score: 1

    I installed Gentoo on my Acer Aspire One for a very good reason. The Intel Atom N270 is a rather lightweight processor that unfortunately lacks out of order execution, but it does have a very dandy instruction set. MMX SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 are all supported. With so little power available, it makes even more sense to grab every little bit one can get. Unfortunately, as mentioned, your slant in the post was more in the direction of "out of the box"

    --
    ! /* */
  170. Re: actually like Vista, but XP is... crap by neonsignal · · Score: 1

    Maybe he is the guy who liked Windows ME but hated Windows 98.

    Or the guy who thought ewoks more dramatic than the Wookie.

  171. Re: like Vista, but XP is... crap by neonsignal · · Score: 1

    Maybe he is the same guy who liked Windows ME but hated Windows 98.

    Or the one who thought Ewoks had more dramatic potential than the Wookie.

  172. Just to be a traitor... Acer! by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

    Fry's has the Acer Aspire One on sale for $300 - it comes standard with a 3 cell battery (1 - 2 hours)

    I have it -- its a great 2nd portable computer for spare web browsing, coding, mp3, and old-school 2d gaming.
    http://shop1.frys.com/search?search_type=regular&sqxts=1&query_string=acer+aspire+one&cat=0&submit.x=0&submit.y=0

    Just got these spare parts from Amazon...

    9 Cell ( 7+ hours!) Spare Battery, $75
    http://www.amazon.com/HQRP-Replacement-Lithium-Ion-Subnotebook-Mousepad/dp/B001P0F71G/

    Spare AC Adapter, $21
    http://www.amazon.com/HQRP-Replacement-Subnotebook-Netbook-Mousepad/dp/B001ODA6II/

    Cheap way to get XP Home :-)

    --
    "Gamestar: A famous game developer, or player"

  173. Debian all the way by craigevil · · Score: 1

    Debian works on any of the Eee PC models.
    http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEeePC

    On my 701 it boots in 20 seconds to lxde, wireless just works, suspend works.On my wife's 1000HE everything also works.

    --
    Debian Sid LXDE Firefox 3.6.4
    GNU/Linux and Firefox, surfing the internet safely.
  174. Mandriva by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

    I don't have an Eee, but I'm going to recommend the same distro I would recommend for any personal use: Mandriva. Runs great on both my Desktop and Laptop. Even picked up my laptop's wifi (A broadcom chip) without any configuration. Download the Mandriva One CD - it's a LiveCD I believe, so you can play with it from there, and it comes with Flash and proprietary drivers and such, unlike the Free version, so it'll take a bit less work to get configured.

  175. Re:don't want to sound elitist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obvious troll is obvious. And successful.

  176. Re:don't want to sound elitist by Stween · · Score: 1

    Good call on the NC10. For Ubuntu information, here's the page with installation help you want: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/NC10

    My NC10 is running standard Ubuntu, and gets 5 hours battery life on standard usage. (7 to 8 hours when it's idling.)

  177. eeebuntu or debian eee + plug for zareason.com by j_zhill · · Score: 1

    I currently have a 701 4G, a 901 20G and have a tracking number for the brand spanking 1000 HE.

    Yep, I love dem ASUS!

    The question was: which distro for an EeePC. I have tried ubuntu-eee (now easy peasy), xandros, debian eee, cruncheee and a plethora of small and variously customised distros. I guess I would recommend either eeebuntu or debian eee and leave the decision up to you. It boils down to your preference: ubuntu or debian, as I have found the eee forks of these distros to be roughly equivalent.

    I have settled on dual booting the original ASUS xandros with eeebuntu (base). The quick off-to-google time is the only real reason I keep the xandros OS on, although I do like to keep the ASUS software up to date simply as a point of comparison. Eeebuntu worked OOTB for me. The base version is lean, and allows you to install the programs you need without fear of fluff. One thing for eeebuntu: for some reason, the downthemall! addon for firefox came installed as admin. This may be fixed now, but its a good thing to be aware of; if you run ffox for the first time as gksu (not sudo!) you can decline the license agreement and the addon is uninstalled.

    I chose ubuntu 'cos I like brown, I've been using it for years, and the volume of forum help is pretty awesome if you run into trouble.

    Dual booting is a good option in my books. Perhaps you could dual boot windows 7 with your chosen linux distro?

    Finally, I just wanted to plug zareason.com. They sell ubuntu based machines, including the eee 1000, that have been thoroughly road tested and come with 2 years of support.

    Its the kind of business that got my mum off micro$oft.

  178. Re:I've tried a few, I recommend Ubuntu Netbook Re by agent0range_ · · Score: 1

    I'm a little confused by that, too.. unless someone's feelings were hurt because I said Gentoo is a pain in the ass to install, which is true. Heck, it didn't even support the onboard ethernet. Gentoo is my favorite distro, which is why I went through all the trouble to install it in the first place.

    I still recommend the netbook remix. If, however, you want to try Gentoo I highly recommend moving the portage temp dir to a ramdisk to speed things up and minimize reads/writes to the SSD.

    http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Portage_TMPDIR_on_tmpfs

  179. Re: like Vista, but XP is... crap by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

    So you're saying he's George Lucas?

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  180. OpenSolaris 2008.11 runs beautifully on my 701 by timf · · Score: 1

    Everything works out of the box except the webcam and the wired ethernet - for which there's a 3rd party driver (google "atge"). Excellent suspend/resume support, audio, compiz, etc. and I get to use ZFS on the 4g ssd as well as an 8gb SD card.

    I wouldn't want to run anything else, having tried xandros & Eeebuntu.

    disclaimer: I work at Sun. ( so, using OpenSolaris as my main OS in my day jobs, means I naturally am more comfortable with it on my netbook )

  181. try Eeedora by pmin · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised no-one has mentioned EeeDora yet, which really is Fedora 8 customized for the Eee. I love it, but then again, I have been using Red Hat/Fedora for about 8 years now. I'm running Fedora on my main development machine, and it's great to be able to sync easily between my Eee and my desktop.

    The ISO image download page seems to be out of quota ("This account has been suspended. Please contact the billing/support department as soon as possible. "), but you can still get the file easily using Bittorrent: the filename is EeeDora-2008-06-23_01h15m.iso (about 330 MB)(7 seeders when I last looked).

    I wrote up some notes on the EeeDora installation process.

    1. Re:try Eeedora by mdda · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the Reference!

      I created EeeDora back in Dec-2007, precisely because I wanted Fedora on my EeePC. It's really minimal - but only Fedora 8 at the moment.

      Fedora 10 has the WiFi drivers integrated, and I've been working (albeit v. slowly) on getting everything 'packaged' (rather than the bulk unpacking of stuff that I concocted to get the job done quickly in 2007).

      I think that Eeedora 10 (or, more likely 11, soon) will have the LXDE desktop - since it's so efficient, though there's also a Fedora-Lite distribution being pulled together that's got more of the 'real' Fedora guys involved.

      I had no idea that the homepage had gone down - my apologies - I'll see whether I can do something about that...

    2. Re:try Eeedora by pmin · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the Reference!

      I created EeeDora back in Dec-2007, precisely because I wanted Fedora on my EeePC.

      Well, thank you for doing all the hard work! :-)

      For a cool picture, check out connecting the Eee to an external monitor
      :-)

  182. Not a Linux distro but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because i am familiar with the install process, its oh so small footprint, the excellent FAQs and manual pages; I have OpenBSD installed on my eeepc 901 netbook. It originally came with Xandros which I used for a while before installing Ubuntu on the extra 16gb disk. I couldn't get the wireless card to work with Ubuntu and I wasn't particularly pleased with the amount of screen real-estate used up by gnome et el. And even after upgrading the memory to 2gig I still found the time it took to launch apps a tad too slow. So early this year I installed my preferred Unix OS, OpenBSD on the 4gig disk and use the 16gig disk for /home. I find OpenBSD and xfce4 are perfect for this little netbook. Wifi works with the ral(4) driver and i get the usual 8hours battery life.

    Here is my dmesg(8) and sysctl(8).

    OpenBSD 4.4-current (GENERIC) #1671: Wed Feb 4 01:28:11 MST 2009
    todd@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
    cpu0: Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N270 @ 1.60GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 1.61 GHz
    cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,EST,TM2,xTPR
    real mem = 2138271744 (2039MB)
    avail mem = 2059341824 (1963MB)
    mainbus0 at root
    bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 10/03/08, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xf0010, SMBIOS rev. 2.5 @ 0xf0710 (30 entries)
    bios0: vendor American Megatrends Inc. version "1603" date 10/03/2008
    bios0: ASUSTeK Computer INC. 901
    acpi0 at bios0: rev 0
    acpi0: tables DSDT FACP APIC MCFG OEMB HPET SSDT
    acpi0: wakeup devices P0P2(S4) P0P1(S4) P0P4(S4) P0P6(S4) P0P7(S4) P0P8(S4) P0P9(S4)
    acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits
    acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee00000: PC-AT compat
    cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor)
    cpu0: apic clock running at 133MHz
    cpu at mainbus0: not configured
    ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 2 pa 0xfec00000, version 20, 24 pins
    ioapic0: misconfigured as apic 1, remapped to apid 2
    acpihpet0 at acpi0: 14318179 Hz
    acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0)
    acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus 5 (P0P4)
    acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus 3 (P0P6)
    acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus 1 (P0P7)
    acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus -1 (P0P8)
    acpiprt5 at acpi0: bus -1 (P0P9)
    acpiprt6 at acpi0: bus 4 (P0P5)
    acpiec0 at acpi0
    acpicpu0 at acpi0
    acpitz0 at acpi0: critical temperature 90 degC
    acpibat0 at acpi0: BAT0 model "901" serial type LION oem "ASUS"
    acpiac0 at acpi0: AC unit online
    acpiasus0 at acpi0
    acpibtn0 at acpi0: LID_
    acpibtn1 at acpi0: SLPB
    acpibtn2 at acpi0: PWRB
    acpivideo at acpi0 not configured
    bios0: ROM list: 0xc0000/0xec00!
    cpu0: unknown Enhanced SpeedStep CPU, msr 0x060f0c2206000c22
    cpu0: using only highest and lowest power states
    cpu0: Enhanced SpeedStep 1600 MHz (1244 mV): speeds: 1600, 800 MHz
    pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (bios)
    pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 82945GME Host" rev 0x03
    vga1 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 "Intel 82945GME Video" rev 0x03
    wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
    wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
    intagp0 at vga1
    agp0 at intagp0: aperture at 0xd0000000, size 0x10000000
    inteldrm0 at vga1: apic 2 int 16 (irq 3)
    drm0 at inteldrm0
    "Intel 82945GM Video" rev 0x03 at pci0 dev 2 function 1 not configured
    azalia0 at pci0 dev 27 function 0 "Intel 82801GB HD Audio" rev 0x02: apic 2 int 16 (irq 3)

  183. Re:don't want to sound elitist by tprime · · Score: 1

    Thank you for making my point (and thanks for your help).

    --
    http://www.tomandemily.com
  184. I place a vote for Elive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have Elive unstable running on my original 4GB eeepc and it runs amazing. everything detected perfectly device wise. starts up and shuts down fairly quick. some eyecandy but not too drainingly so. recognises cpu throttling ability.

    overall a good choice
    http://www.elivecd.org/

  185. Gentoo! by strredwolf · · Score: 1

    No, really! Even with a 16 gig SSD card, Gentoo works great after all the configuration. I sped up the compile by pushing my 900A to 2 gig, compiling on the RAM disk, and setting up the initial config on a VMWare virtual PC.

    --

    --
    # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
    1. Re:Gentoo! by Logic+Worshiper · · Score: 1

      He needs something that will install from a flash drive. Is there a Gentoo USB live disk setup program?

  186. Debian-eee by An+Audience+of+One · · Score: 1

    Debian Lenny (which was released last weekend or so) supports the Eee out of the box. (I'm using it on an Eee1000 now. http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEeePC has links to a custom installer which will install all the right packages for you, but it's juts Debian under the hood. I get good battery life and everything seems to pretty much Just Work(tm)

  187. crunchbang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try crunchbanglinux.org

  188. Re:don't want to sound elitist by tprime · · Score: 1

    BTW - I am having trouble deciding between the ASUS 1000HE and the Samsung NC10. Any reason you chose the NC10?

    --
    http://www.tomandemily.com
  189. *buntu ho' by freakalad · · Score: 1

    http://www.eeebuntu.org/ & no doubt about it!

  190. I'm sorry, XP runs like a piece of crap for you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really never thought I'd say this but "XP is pretty much the best OS M$ has these days"

    If you can't get XP to run on that hardware it's most likely a ram issue and changing to Linux isn't going to help as much as you thought unless all you use the machine for is a bit of word processing and a web browser.

    Linux will definitely use the hardware much faster than XP until you run out of ram and then it will be just as much of a brick as when you're running XP. XP just runs out of ram a whole lot sooner.

  191. Coincidence? by voice.Lex · · Score: 1

    So strange that I bought one about 10 minutes before I saw this post this morning... Anywho, I'll be trying out eeeubuntu first, I've loved all the input so far, great question OP.

    --
    www.thinkgreenthoughts.org
  192. openSUSE 11.1 by nan0meter · · Score: 1

    I don't run an EEE pc but i do run linux on my laptop, quite the same thing right? Despite the size then .. Anyway .. am running openSUSE 11.1 x64 on it, and sometimes my atheros driver locks using NetworkManager, doesn't show me any networks at all and when i tried to create one it disconnected me right away. Even after a restart it didn't work so i turned it on and off then it worked again, so it seems to be the driver which locks up my built in wireless thingy. But when it does work it works like a charm, very easy to use with NetworkManager (even when using fluxbox)

  193. easy peasy = ubuntu for eee pc by i+love+colleen · · Score: 1

    The easiest way to install Ubuntu on the Eee PC is a custom version called Easy Peasy: www.geteasypeasy.com (formerly known as Eeebuntu).

    The latest version is based on Ubuntu 8.10, and includes a Netbook-specific Gnome interface by default, which you can easily change if you prefer plain old Gnome or KDE. The install is very quick and simple, everything works immediately, and it can be done from a USB flash drive. Compiz is disabled by default to give you some more speed and less bugs.

    I just installed this on my 701, and it was the easiest OS install on a laptop I have ever experienced.

  194. YOU = FANBOY by Quickfingers · · Score: 1

    You're a damn idiot. I have run XP WITHOUT INCIDENT on hardware ranging from a Pentium II 233 MHz to my current rig now. There is NO REASON at all that you should be having problems running XP on your EEEPC. Stop Microsoft hating and just shut up! It's stupid little Linux fanboys like you that give Microsoft a bad name for no reason.

  195. CrunchEee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm surprised no one has mentioned CrunchEee

    It is based off ubuntu but with OpenBox as the Window Manager.

    It's light, fast, stable, has drivers, looks amazing, etc.

    you can download it from here

    the installation guide is here

    and some screenshots can be found here

  196. OpenSolaris? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try it, you might like it.

  197. Ubuntu has its ups and downs by Foldarn · · Score: 1

    I used my Asus eee 1000HA as my first foray into the Linux world and chose to do so with Ubuntu 8.10 Intrepid Ibex. Out of the box, my wifi did NOT work, but it was a single download and 4 typed commands away using ath5k drivers available for free online. My ONLY ISSUE with Ubuntu is the screen size of the eee screen. I do like the default 2x bars on the screen, one at the top and one at the bottom. The vertical size of the screen does make it very hard to click some of the buttons at the bottom of dialogue boxes. This is easily fixed by adding hide arrows to the panels so you can shove them off the screen when they're not needed. You can hide the bars if you want as well, so that's also an option.

    Except for the wifi, EVERYTHING so far has worked straight out of the box. I reformatted the second partition as Ext3 and copied some of my MP3 collection to it. With the proper drivers, you can access your Ext3 partitions and drives from Windows if needed. Ubuntu will read the windows partition automatically, so you don't even need that.

    In my opinion, slapping Ubuntu on it was the best thing I could have ever done with it... It's SO much more responsive than Windows was.

  198. try puppy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or puppeee. Works for me.

  199. Easy as 1, 2, 3 by markdavis · · Score: 1

    1) Why did you spend the extra money and buy your not-so-netbook with XP in the first place?
    2) The included Xandros on my EEE1000 worked great!
    3) EEEbuntu worked fantastically. Everything just worked, right after the easy install. Me very happy!

    http://www.eeebuntu.org/

  200. How about Puppy Linux? by ezeze5000 · · Score: 1

    I have been using Puppy Linux loaded on an SD card. Puppy4.1.1 runs fine on my eee701, even the wireless works fine. Puppy is real fast, and is great for cruising the net or checking e-mails.

  201. HP 2133 by linuxgnuru · · Score: 1

    I have two HP 2133 netbooks (120 gb HD version) and have Fedora 10 on one; Ubuntu 8.10 the other. Other than the VIA graphics (Chrome 9) not working out of the box, I've found Ubuntu to be the better of the two for installation and wifi support.

    --
    Linux: When reboots are for upgrades.
  202. give xp another shot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ive been using an eee 701 nearly since they came out so my laptop is worse than yours in pretty much every conceivable way. however, ive tried several linux distros and all of them were far too sluggish to be useable (including the stock xandros install). ive found that a heavily stripped down copy of xp is by far the best solution; there are several nlite'd xp distros available on the piratebay meant specifically for eee's, as well as driver packs and specialized windows programs for graphics interface and battery monitoring, etc. give xp another shot under the right conditions and i think you'll find that it's very well suited for the eee :)

  203. Re:Instead of wanting a distro that "just works".. by Logic+Worshiper · · Score: 1

    Then get a Mac. It's still a Unix kernel, and it just works.

  204. Mandriva 2009 works out of the box by mlijour · · Score: 1

    I bought one of the first Eee PC 1000 with a 40GB SSD and a Linux distribution that I quickly replaced by Mandriva. It works out of the box and the developers included support for this model even though they were close to the 2009 release. Everything works fine: wireless card, screen size is adapted to the model (a few very big config windows must be moved a little), java, Flash, video and audio codecs, everything is there out of the box (I have the 2009 PowerPack version). Mandriva was one of the first best distros for the desktop and although Ubuntu became popular Mandriva still rocks.

  205. stock 701 O/S by discord2000 · · Score: 1

    I bought one of the 701 EEEPCs when they first came out (7" screen, 4GB flash). Within a week I put ubuntu on it and it just didn't seem to fit for a netbook O/S. I ended up going back to the stock O/S (slightly tweaked Xandros) and made a few modifications to it, upgrading OpenOffice, removing the UnionFS, etc. It is soooo much faster to start and do the basic netbook stuff like check emails, and check wikipedia when my brain fails me (often). IMHO, Asus did a great job with this distro, and I've found most apps I want that aren't on there are in the Xandros apt repo. These packages work flawlessly, and even Debian sarge packages are generally OK since Xandros is Debian-based.

  206. Macosx and iDeneb by Julz · · Score: 1

    Youc ould try iDeneb [http://ideneb.net] and there's instructions here [http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1048117/how_to_install_macosx_on_eeepc_pg2.html?cat=59] and here [http://www.scribd.com/doc/6428329/Leopard-on-EeePC]

    --
    When shit hits the fan get some of these https://youtu.be/pY-GncsZ-UE
  207. DebianEeePC is good. by fialar · · Score: 1

    I've installed it on my little 4G and my wife's 1000HD and it works great.

    DebianEeePC

    Nice thing about Debian is it doesn't install a ton of cruft like Ubuntu seems to. (I've used both distros.)

  208. Fedora 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fedora 10 on an eeePC 701:

    http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EeePc

  209. EasyPeasy by absolut_kurant · · Score: 1

    I had very good results with EasyPeasy on my EEE 901. Everything (incl. webcam, wifi, network, sound, hotkeys, etc.) works like a charm without any tweaking necessary. It's based on Ubuntu.

    --
    Yes.
  210. eeeuser.com by simplerThanPossible · · Score: 1

    Ask on this excellent eee PC forum: http://forum.eeeuser.com/

    There's also a wiki listing several different linuxes: http://wiki.eeeuser.com/ (see table of contents on right-hand side)

  211. eee 900 + win7 by polle404 · · Score: 1
    I use a EEE 900, i've had eeebuntu http://www.eeebuntu.org/, EasyPeasy http://www.geteasypeasy.com/ and eeedora http://wiki.eeeuser.com/howto:eeedora running everything out of the box.

    But, since you seem to be a windows fan, why not try win7 beta?
    I tried it, everything worked out of the box, but i'm a *nix person, so eeebuntu went on it again in my case.

    --

    ~men are from earth. women are from earth. deal with it.~
  212. How To Ask Questions The Smart Way by RichiH · · Score: 1

    Strange, but http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html does not seem to list "maximize the amount of snide remarks".

  213. Ubuntu by Apollo13 · · Score: 1

    Ubuntu 8.10 works perfectly on my EEPC912

  214. Debian by lars_boegild_thomsen · · Score: 1

    Debian Lenny works absolutely perfect on my Eee PC 1000HD. Everything - and I do mean everything - is working flawlessly using only standard Debian packages (yes - with one extra repository added).

  215. Re:don't want to sound elitist by Zebedeu · · Score: 1

    For me:
    1. It's pretier
    2. It was available last month and I didn't want to wait anymore (I think you still can't get the 1000HE)
    3. I think it's smaller, not sure though

    By the way, if you're ready to wait a bit, Samsung is releasing an update to the NC10 with longer-lasting battery.

  216. Arch linux (eth + wifi o.of.t.b) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I run Arch linux on 701 with a few games and couple of apps like bluefish and opera/FF fits in les 1.5 Gb. Tried Gentoo but arch is just quicker to fix stuff with. Use Toofishes kernelEEE package. boots in about 20 seconds.

  217. I like Vista too! but... by marcomarrero · · Score: 1

    Ok, maybe only the Vista kernel... Windows keeps mutating, becoming more like Microsoft Bob. Ironically, the Windows Server 2008 install has many of those stupid things turned off. Even so, it takes just too many tweaks to make it better.

    On the Eee, the only good choice for most users is Easy Peasy. Ubuntu is badly pre-configured. I am running XP on my Eee, I can't recommend it because it requires nLite and a monstrous amount of additional tweaks make it SSD friendly. I hate Microsoft for not telling how they managed to make XP run on the XO laptop, fortunately there are many excellent Eee forums out there.

  218. Re:Fedora -EEEBox 202 by Old-Claimjumper · · Score: 1

    I picked up an Asus EEEBox 202, burned the Fedora-10 dvd to a USB key, and made a home server for DNS, DHCP, wireless, etc. Needed to get updated drivers for the wireless but that was trivial...

    Love the box. Low power. Runs everything.

  219. Re:don't want to sound elitist by Zebedeu · · Score: 1

    By the way, some more information regarding stock Ubuntu on the NC10:

    The webpage you mentioned gives a lot of useful information, but some of it is outdated (or at least I had a different experience).

    For example, audio worked out of the box. Then after updating the system, I lost audio out -- for some reason the PCM volume was set to 0. Just go to the volume control panel and reset it to the desired level. My suggestion is to simply jump over the audio "fixes".

    The fix for wireless in that page worked perfectly. Some other sites recomend weird stuff like compiling your drivers, and mention that you may get low wifi performance and kernel upgrades break the driver. Performance on my network is good, though I haven't been through a kernel update since installing (I first installed all updates, and then applied the wireless fix).

    Internal mic is working perfectly, but I found that when I plug in my headset, it doesn't take over. In the volume control panel you can choose which mic you want to use.

    Hotkeys have a lot of problems. They either don't work or they work poorly. Last time I was at that site they just suggested patching the kernel, which I decided was too much work for me. Now I see that it's possible to install the kernel for Jaunty. I'll probably try that once I get home.

    The touchpad horizontal and vertical sensitivities are screwed-up. I tried to apply the xorg.conf they suggest, but it didn't work for me. My "fix" was to get used to it (I know -- sucks) until a proper fix was posted. Now I see that they have some more suggestions, I guess I have to try them when I get home.

    Finally, you'll probably want to optimize your environment. Gnome takes way too many liberties with how it uses your screen real-estate. This page gives some helpful advice: http://nc10linux.wordpress.com/2008/12/29/maximizing-screen-space

  220. Why not use the new Debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I installed Debian for EEE some days ago after I was frustrated about Ubuntu and everything worked out of the box (WLan, Hotkeys, Standby...). You still have to do some configuration and some hacking (FlashPlayer etc.) but by far not as much as with Gentoo (which I actually love) or such. Give it a try: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEeePC

  221. I tested many distros on the eeePC by justingill · · Score: 1

    Hey Everyone Last year I took a few weeks and played with a number of linux distros on the eeePC. I've had quite a bit of feedback playing with the different distros. These should explain in detail a bit more about the pros/cons of each distro and what worked and didn't work out of the box. Please take a look: http://justingill.com/blog/2008/03/16/the-perfect-out-of-the-box-asus-eee-pc-linux-install-ubuntu-804/ http://justingill.com/blog/2008/03/18/mandriva-linux-spring-2008-release-on-the-asus-eee-pc/ http://justingill.com/blog/2008/04/04/mandriva-20081rc2-update-3-weeks-after-release/

  222. Re:I'm sorry to the reality-hater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Psst. It's a joke, predicated on the documented fact that Fox News viewers tend to be misinformed on a variety of issues.

  223. What distro will fit on the 2gb model ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My girlfriend has the smallest of the EEEs, the 701 surf model with only 2gig of disk space. I was able to install Xubuntu on it, but disk space was always bordeline full. For instance, a kernel upgrade would fill up the disk. I've trimmed it the best I can, but haven't tried removing libraries (too hardcore for me). Is there a distro out there that will natively fit on a 2gig drive, with X and some internet apps ?

    In the meantime, Xubuntu 8.10 is running from an SD card... slow as hell but at least don't have to worry about it... :-/

  224. Re:don't want to sound elitist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what the hell, why can't I read the original post? The thing I love most about that 1.2% is how awesome the whole community is and how they treat each other with respect. I hope market penetration doesn't surpass that, because the mouth breathing Windows crowd would turn our club of clever people into the cesspool of retarded sheep the rest of the computing world has become over the last couple of decades.

    Seriously, the only time I ever see the Linux crowd be douchebags to anyone is:
    A) When argueing with Wintard trolls who stumble into linux threads
    b) Well, pretty much any thread on Slashdot. But I'm convinced most are doing it ironically

  225. switched to XP on mine after trying Fedora by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know it's heresy on /. but I replaced the bizarre Xandros that came with my 4G Surf with XP Pro and never looked back.

    Previously I ran Fedora-9 for a number of months and it was pretty good once I worked out the hotkey scripts to control brightness/volume/etc, but it was still a pain trying to get wireless etc. to work under some circumstances.

    I do Linux for a living. I don't want to work that hard to get a play toy to work at home.

    Putting XP on there with the ASUS drivers for ethernet, wireless, acpi, video, and sound resulted in a computer that just plain worked for all of the 'light' computing I do on my netbook.

    I did add vlc for watching movies already ripped to iPod-compatible settings, which also worked great.

    I think netbooks are the wave of the future. Personally I don't have any religious views about whose os runs on them. I'm buying the netbook to do things and really don't want the os, anybody's os, in my way.

  226. You LIKE Vista but DISLIKE XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has got to be a typo.

  227. The sheer volume of productivity wasted by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

    on these installs and configs boggles the mind.
    No wonder the US economy is tanking.
    Everyone "smart" is trying to get their netbook
    to talk to the interweb.

    While I'm sympathetic to the linux ethic and wouldn't use much else for servers, my fanboy side can't help pleading for an apple netbook.

    Just freakin work please. I have actual work to do.

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
  228. There is other distro than ubuntu out there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use ArchLinux on my EEE901.

    ArchLinux give me 100% satisfaction. Everything works if you follow the wiki dedicated to the 901:
    http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Asus_Eee_PC_901

    This distro is optimized for x686 arch, (i.e binaries and libraries are compiled with arch and cpu optimization and without debug flags) ArchLinux is really fast, mature and a wide range of package is available, from development to entertainment.

    I fact, it is so good that I ditched Debian out of my comp to put Arch on it too.

    - Sylvain

  229. You don't need a distro, you want NetBSD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leave GNU/Linux out of your goals, setting up NetBSD on your Eee PC. It's easy, fast and power.

  230. Noose by troll8901 · · Score: 1

    ... fashion a noose with the ethernet cable.

    Ethernet noose? Bah! That won't hold the weight.

    You should use V.35 cable instead. I'm sure OP has plenty of them at home.

  231. Yes, but... by troll8901 · · Score: 1

    Does it run Java?

    (Just joking!)

  232. Re:don't want to sound elitist by tprime · · Score: 1

    Thanks, I ended up ordering the 1000HE, which shipped today so I should have it Monday or Tuesday. I was really torn about whether to wait or not for the 1000HE since both models seemed to be pretty close from a +/- standpoint. I chose the 1000HE for the extra battery time, better touchpad and better tested wifi connection speeds, but I the battery time and wifi connection speeds were close. I thought about the NC10SE for the better battery life and better touchpad, but in that model they switched to a glossy screen and I wanted matte. It really was a tough decision.

    --
    http://www.tomandemily.com
  233. Moblin by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

    I tried the Moblin live image from the Fast Boot project on my EEE 901. I wanted to see it boot in 5 seconds, like they claim. Instead, it took 37 seconds to boot from a USB stick. The links take you to a generic image, not one that's been tuned for this fast booting. When I saw it bring up Bluetooth and AHAVI, I knew that couldn't be it. Wonder what you have to do to get that speedy boot.

    --
    Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
  234. Damn Small Linux and friends by WindShadow · · Score: 1

    I would say that you should go to distrowatch and look at things like Damn Small Linux or Pupply Linux or similar, which use smaller window managers.

    I do hear very good things about the Fedora version eeDora although the stock version with the smaller window manager works well, too.

    A little tuning in /proc/sys/vm will help:
    - swappiness - make smaller
    - laptop mode - set ON
    - dirty_expires - set to 1000 or smaller
    and of course add memory!