Slashdot Mirror


Obamas Give Queen Elizabeth an iPod

Ponca City, We love you writes "What did the Obamas give Queen Elizabeth II on Wednesday when they arrived at Buckingham Palace? An Obama aide reported the queen was given an iPod loaded with video and photos of her 2007 trip to the United States, as well as songs and accessories. She also received a rare songbook signed by the composer Richard Rodgers. The gift issue had come up after Prime Minister Gordon Brown visited the White House last month. Mr. Brown gave Mr. Obama a pen holder carved from the timber of an anti-slave ship, receiving in return a DVD box set of American movies, igniting a torrent of criticism in the British press. According to news reports, the queen gave the Obamas a silver-framed signed photograph — a gift she gives to all visiting dignitaries."

649 comments

  1. It's not an iPod by u38cg · · Score: 4, Funny
    It's an oiaeuooPod.

    (RP joke, for the humour impaired).

    --
    [FUCK BETA]
    1. Re:It's not an iPod by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I don't get it.

    2. Re:It's not an iPod by IBBoard · · Score: 1

      Surely it was a onePod because one uses the phrase "one" to refer to ones self rather than taking one down to the uncouth level of using "I" when one is, for example, upset that one cannot help one's fellow humans during a humanitarian crisis.

    3. Re:It's not an iPod by sapphire+wyvern · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, if it's Royal, surely it should be a "we"Pod rather than an iPod or onePod?

    4. Re:It's not an iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Umm, no, he's making fun of how the royals pronounce vowels (the clue is RP = Received Pronunciation, look it up on wikipedia)

      Or maybe IHBT...

    5. Re:It's not an iPod by jabithew · · Score: 2, Funny

      And you've just written tomorrow's 'Sun' headline.

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    6. Re:It's not an iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wouldn't perhaps think he was joking about the Queen's accent? Which is like RP, but a bit different.

    7. Re:It's not an iPod by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's also the sound a horny Ewok makes.
      Maybe the original poster is a Star Wars geek with sexual issues.
      Of course, I doubt the Queen wants her leg humped by an Ewok.

    8. Re:It's not an iPod by JPLemme · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wish there was a "± 0 Confusing" mod point...

    9. Re:It's not an iPod by mdda · · Score: 1

      And also that when the Queen says 'I', she pronounces it 'We' : As in the "Royal We" (a traditional started by Queen Victoria AFAIR).

    10. Re:It's not an iPod by meringuoid · · Score: 1

      No, no, no. It's a my Government and iPod.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    11. Re:It's not an iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nowadays that's spelled WiiPod. She could give him a weepot in return.

    12. Re:It's not an iPod by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Since when did chimps become a race?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    13. Re:It's not an iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (RP joke, for the humour impaired)

      While you're there, you might look up WP:AGF as well.

    14. Re:It's not an iPod by snspdaarf · · Score: 1

      Of course, I doubt the Queen wants her leg humped by an Ewok.

      That's what thought. But then I went to YouTube.....

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    15. Re:It's not an iPod by IBBoard · · Score: 1

      That depends - it is the "Royal We", but any time she does a speech it is always "one is upset to hear about [insert thing here]" rather than "I am upset to hear about [insert thing here]".

    16. Re:It's not an iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he's racist cretin. That's the sound a chimp makes.

      HAH! Jumped the gun on that one, didn't you?
      I suppose you're one of those people that think anything said that could even slightly, conceivably, be construed as negative towards Saint Obama is "racist". Get over yourself. Apparently it's *where* your mind is, not everyone else's.

    17. Re:It's not an iPod by metlin · · Score: 1

      Yeah. How can people *not* know what RP is? :-\

      Integral to elementary English, one would imagine.

    18. Re:It's not an iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "iPod" but there are many iPods. Was this a Touch? a Classic? a Nano? Come on! DETAILS PEOPLE!!

    19. Re:It's not an iPod by ross.w · · Score: 1

      OR maybe "My Husband and iPod"

      although HM hasn't started a speech that way in a very long time.

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    20. Re:It's not an iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need to change the spelling, she just needs to interpret the 'i' as a Roman numeral.

    21. Re:It's not an iPod by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      There is, but like a neutrino it's difficult to detect.

    22. Re:It's not an iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever pod it was I'm pretty sure it ended up at GCHQ!

    23. Re:It's not an iPod by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      I LOL U L8M8R and ROTFL.

      I hate abbreviations. If you're too lazy to type the whole word, then you deserve to have people go "what?" in response. The purpose of communication is to communicate and you're not achieving that goal with obscure abbreviations like "RP".

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    24. Re:It's not an iPod by metlin · · Score: 1

      Well, most educated people would make the connection between English, England, Queen Elizabeth and RP. But hey, flame on.

  2. its England by mcfatboy93 · · Score: 3, Funny

    And its good to be Queen...

    --
    Its not my fault, someone put a wall in my way.
  3. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It seems kind of 'tarded to give a 70+ year old woman an ipod with a tiny screen filled with speeches she is very unlikely to agree with (not that he would even be aware of her political leanings.)

    I would have given her a gift of pictures of her during the WW2 blitz on London, showing her changing tires and working along with the rest of the people under siege by the Germans and put this into a classy montage. I would want to honor her good qualities, and there is plenty out there. For one of the richest women in the world, I'm certain trinkets are not high on her shopping list.

    Seriously, Obama is a sad amateur. Camacho was a smarter president.

  4. Problem with DVDs was... by Zarhan · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...that the Region 1 DVD's didn't play in Brown's Region 2 player. On his next visit Obama will give him a modding kit.

    1. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by n1ckml007 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be awesome if DRM went away as a results. La sigh...

    2. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People still pay extra for players that enforce regions, and give that "Operation Not Permitted" crap when you want to skip through the menus?\

      I was surprised the first time I saw that ... glad I'm boycotting Sony.

    3. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'll bet he hasn't even looked at them since. They're sitting in a big cupboard labelled "gifts from foreign dignitaries".

      I'd also be surprised if the PM had a non-hackable player.

    4. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be rude. Obama should give him a grey market imported Region free DVD player.

      Or better yet, a CD with a licensed copy of ANYDVD and a copy of handbrake, hand it to him and say, "this will get rid of all the must watch bullshit that the idiots in hollywood put on every disc as well.

      Honestly, Obama does not choose the Gifts given to dignitaries, most are pre chosen by some crack staff members... The last trip we still had the idiot from the Bush Administration that was handing out DVD box sets and Coors beer 6 packs.

    5. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then after the modding, depending on the DVD player, he might experience the joys of NTSC vs PAL.

    6. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      That's actually quite true.

      Gifts given to UK MPs end up either getting sent back, sold or they have to be bought by the PM.

    7. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Informative

      Even less problem than the region coding. I've not seen a TV that can't handle a 60Hz signal in the last decade. Nor have I seen a DVD player that can't output PAL60.

    8. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by rpjs · · Score: 1

      Pretty much all DVD players sold in the UK are easily hackable - sometimes they even come with instructions so you don't even have to go online to find out how to do it.

    9. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by RDW · · Score: 5, Funny

      Rumours that Station X at Bletchley Park is to be re-opened in order to decrypt 'important data received on disk-based media from a high level US government source' remain unconfirmed. In other news, the Obama Administration has not yet commented on the suggestion that all gifts intended for European dignitaries for the duration of the recession were bulk-purchased in the Circuit City closing down sale.

    10. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by ianpm · · Score: 1

      Actually, tucked into one of the DVD cases was a copy of DVD Shrink. Gordon simply needs to install that, and he's good to watch the movies without FBI warnings and unskippable trailers.

    11. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by TyrainDreams · · Score: 1

      Would be very random, but sure that would be awesome.

    12. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      most are pre chosen by some crack staff members...

      Maybe it's time to replace them with pot-heads?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    13. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by weber · · Score: 1

      We need a +0 naive moderation option.

    14. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by T+Murphy · · Score: 1

      Okay so can you get a DVD player from major sites/stores that doesn't enforce the DRM? Serious question here- my DVD player is old and needs replacement.

    15. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by Bruiser80 · · Score: 1

      Or maybe an american DVD player? Then he can forget to give him a plug adapter :-D

      Oh yeah, and he'll give him a player that doesn't support PAL ;-)

      --
      Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling a pig in the mud. After a while, you realize the engineer enjoys it.
    16. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by n1ckml007 · · Score: 1

      La == Le

    17. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there are a lot of DVD players out there for which you can find the region unlock codes usually some combination of keys in the remote and then a code, makes the player (any) region specific or region free

    18. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm guilty of buying a region-enforcing Pioneer at Best Buy. I had just blown through two $25 generic players in two years and was willing to pay more so that I wouldn't have to buy a new one and hook everything up yet again in another year. Plus, Pioneer seems to "get it" and will play formats like DiVX.

      That aside, just look at this page to make sure the player you are about to buy has an unlock code.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    19. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but La !== Le

    20. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually more often than not the MP accepts the gift 'on behalf' on civil servants who are allowed to accept them where MPs aren't.

    21. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by rlp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...that the Region 1 DVD's didn't play in Brown's Region 2 player. On his next visit Obama will give him a modding kit.

      and an NTSC-compatible television and power converter.

      --
      [Insert pithy quote here]
    22. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by PachmanP · · Score: 1

      La == Le

      No No No. Le == La + 8====D

      --
      You're thinking small. Why miniaturize the laser, when we could instead enlarge the sharks? -John Searle
    23. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by ari_j · · Score: 5, Funny

      I had actually pictured the Obamas on Air Force One on the way to England...

      Michelle: So, Mr. President, did you remember to pack the first-edition Walden that I wrapped for the Queen and put on your desk this morning?

      Barack: He removes his iPod earbuds, and we hear the music softly before he presses 'pause' on the iPod resting on his lap. I'm sorry, honey, what were you saying?

      Michelle: I was just checking to be sure you remembered the gift for the Queen. You know what happened last time.

      Barack: .......

      Michelle: Barack?

      Barack: I ... hm. He picks up the iPod and examines it. Do you think that Her Majesty likes Earth Wind and Fire?

    24. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by peterpi · · Score: 1

      Yeah, mine's called a Mac Mini :(

    25. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Fortunately PALNTSC conversion is a standard feature in modern DVD players. In fact, about the only way that modern DVD players could be improved is to remove the stupid region locks... and a lot of them let you do that too if you know the codes.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    26. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by jabithew · · Score: 1

      Most modern British TVs (the LCD ones) are NTSC compatible too. If Jacqui gets us to pay for her porno*, I'm sure Brown has got us to shell out for a nice flatscreen.

      *I know they say it's her husband's, but I don't believe a word.

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    27. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine is called a WD-TV. Never need to buy a DVD player again.

    28. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yikes

    29. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by n1ckml007 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh god, I think you're asciing for trouble.

    30. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by deets101 · · Score: 1

      Me too. First thing I did was disable that crap.

      --

      --
      My parents went to Slashdot and all I got was this lousy sig.
    31. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      That's kinda cool, but why is it $130? My DVD player has a USB port, too and cost $30/less... and that's an expensive DVD player.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    32. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Hard to find a cooperative player.

      I just pass the DVD through my computer. Original DVD goes in, DVD stripped of CSS, PUOs, and regions comes out.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    33. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by treeves · · Score: 1

      Her Majesty's a pretty nice girl, but she doesn't have a lot to say....
      I wanna tell her that I love a lot, but I gotta get a belly full of wine....

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    34. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give this man some +1 Funny.

    35. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by ross.w · · Score: 1

      In Australia, the vendor is obliged to give instructions on how to remove the region code.

      In New Zealand, it's illegal to sell a DVD player that is region coded.

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    36. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      Yeah, he really EBCDIC'ed it up all right. Especially the minor BITS. Maybe he should drink more JAVA before posting to avoid these BASIC mistakes.

  5. heh heh by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How much does custom firmware that will change its function to a logic bomb in the mysterious future cost? Or is that a standard feature in the iPod firmware, available to the federal government at any time? ;)

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  6. who cares? by castironpigeon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Are there really not enough issues in the world to get worked up about that people are arguing over a freakin' gift exchange?

    --
    mmmm...forbidden donut
    1. Re:who cares? by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I a huge politics junkie and it horrifies me what stories the public latches onto when their very futures are at stake. I only assign 1/4 the blame to the messenger. The other 3/4 goes to the public whose mouse clicks and channel selections have indicated to news outlets what their audience wants to see.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    2. Re:who cares? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      You know, I think that's actually the problem. There's the credit crunch and very little else. Normally the media wouldn't care but there was nothing else to talk about so they felt this was as easy a way as any to fell a few column inches.

    3. Re:who cares? by ubergeek2009 · · Score: 1

      I know that diplomats cannot accept gifts from the leaders of other nations, but what about the president. All the other gifts given to federal officials are turned over to the government. This includes diamonds and gold given to diplomats from middle eastern oil states.

    4. Re:who cares? by db32 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You know.... Reading that article made me sick (even beyond the normal slashdotters aren't supposed to read the articles thing). We can't have positive foreign relations with Britain because the POTUS didn't give a government visitor fancy enough gifts? That is pretty unbelievably shallow and self absorbed media coverage even by American standards.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    5. Re:who cares? by virg_mattes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The flip side of this idea is that I spent a few minutes of attention on this story, and it was mildly entertaining. I spend quite a bit more time on important issues, but that doesn't mean there's absolutely no room at all in my life for a bit of fluff on occasion. Even if it took an hour for me to debate this with some random loonies on MSNBC, that would still mean I spent less than one percent of my "news attention span" on it for this week.

      Virg

    6. Re:who cares? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What I don't get is why these exchanges (which happen constantly) were never reported when Bush was in office. What makes them "news" now when they weren't "news" a year ago?

    7. Re:who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you have said the same if Bush where President?

    8. Re:who cares? by anarchy_man3 · · Score: 1

      All this says to me is that Obama didn't tell someone to put their job on hold to go gift shopping. Symbolic or not, any gift between leaders is just useless objects that someone will get paid to dust off every now and then. Like him or not, Obama is a practical man. He probably gives his family gift cards at christmas time so that they can get what they really want instead of waiting in line to return something they didn't really want.

    9. Re:who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw you man, the type of dog Obama gets is important stuff! You think the economy is going to improve if the President gets a poodle?

    10. Re:who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the public whose mouse clicks

      Well, you're reading it :)

    11. Re:who cares? by onefriedrice · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are there really not enough issues in the world to get worked up about that people are arguing over a freakin' gift exchange?

      So... it's only proper to talk about something when it's convenient for democrats? One of the things Bush was most criticized for was how America's image was being tarnished globally, but now that Obama is in, we can't talk about that? I see...

      --
      This author takes full ownership and responsibility for the unpopular opinions outlined above.
    12. Re:who cares? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What I don't get is why these exchanges (which happen constantly) were never reported when Bush was in office. What makes them "news" now when they weren't "news" a year ago?

      I suspect that Bush wasn't in the habit of giving tacky gifts.

      Most likely, he listened to those Foreign Service weenies who had a clue what was appropriate.

      Sounds like Obama is still trying to show he's young enough to understand technology and the youths of our nation. Which is all well and good when picking gifts for the youth of our nation, not so much for foreign dignitaries.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    13. Re:who cares? by TurboNed · · Score: 1

      Your "news attention span" for a week is over one hundred hours? That is impressive.

    14. Re:who cares? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "I suspect that Bush wasn't in the habit of giving tacky gifts."

      At this point, Obama is making GWB look like a freaking Rocket Scientist. Which, if someone told me was even possible six months ago, I would have laughed myself silly.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    15. Re:who cares? by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Insightful
      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    16. Re:who cares? by sycodon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I suspect because Bush and his team observed protocol and gave appropriate gifts.

      Diplomacy is built on protocol. It is what allows two parties that would just as soon kill one another to be in the same room and rationally discuss issues. It prevents people from being unintentionally embarrassed and ensures that everyone pretty much knows what is going to happen.

      Sure, between G.B. and the U.S. it is just a matter of formalities, but protocol is still important. That Barry apparently has such disdain for, is ignorant of, or that his campaign staff is handling protocol is telling.

      He wants to change the world so that everyone "likes" us again. But if he can't even get something as inconsequential as an appropriate girft right, how is he going to pull it off with those not so friendly countries?

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    17. Re:who cares? by ChefInnocent · · Score: 1

      To be fair, he probably spends 38.75 hours here on /., assuming 15 minutes a day of actual work.

    18. Re:who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      From http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/ask/20070508.html regarding the queen's visit to the White House in 2007:

      President and Mrs. Bush gave Her Majesty a bronze statuette âoeHigh Desert Princessâ with a personal inscription on the bottom of the base. It is a replica of the original life size statue that is located in front of the National Cowgirl Museum and Hall of Fame in Ft. Worth, Texas.

      President and Mrs. Bush gave The Prince Philip an exclusive sterling silver eagle box by Tiffany & Co. with personal inscription on the inside lid.

      President and Mrs. Bush gave Their Majesties a leather presentation box filled with a collection of documents from the National Archives. One of the items was a copy of an original letter from President Roosevelt to her father, King George, written in 1938. There were also photos from previous royal visits and a DVD of the footage from the Queenâ(TM)s visit to the United States when she was Princess Elizabeth in 1951.

      Their Majesties gave President Bush a sterling silver oversized plate by William & Son with gold seals including: the Presidential seal, the Royal seal and a center seal with the star of Texas surrounded by roses. There was a personal inscription on the back of the plate. They gave Mrs. Bush a gold and crystal clock with the Royal seal by William & Son.

      The Office of the Chief of Protocol assists the President and First Lady in the selection and presentation of gifts to foreign leaders.

      I can hardly say that gift is any more elegant.

    19. Re:who cares? by castorvx · · Score: 0, Troll

      While I realize it's important to discuss all aspects of international diplomacy, it's slightly ridiculous to compare this blunder with that of the Bush administration's illustrious catalog of them.

      I'd rather be known as the nation of inept gift givers than the nation of torturers, violators of international law, war mongers and science haters.

      We can certainly discuss the things Obama has done wrong (and there are plenty), but it's a fucking order of magnitude below that of the Bush administration's.

    20. Re:who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. It is because Obama is proving himself to be a fucking 'tard when it comes to international relations. There were always concerns due to his lack of experience but no one expected him to screw the pooch on the small stuff.

    21. Re:who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect because Bush and his team observed protocol and gave appropriate gifts.

      blah, blah . blabbity blah
      so it must be because Obama sucks

      It is amazing how you are able to fill in the gaps of your ignorance with your prejudice.
      Next time do a little research before flapping those fingers. It sure didn't take long to google up examples of bush and clinton gift criticisms.
      In other words, nothing new under the sun.

    22. Re:who cares? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not sure whether or not your are trying to agree with me. But I think your examples shows a great deal of thought and proper protocol. The letters from previous era shows a great deal of thoughtfulness of a personal nature.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    23. Re:who cares? by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Well to be fair to the liberals, Obama hasn't started a war or anything.

      On the other hand... this is a state visit, not a surprise birthday party for his good friend Liz. Doesn't he have advisers who know this stuff?

      I don't blame him for not knowing what to give, and for all I know he was just handed the thing by some assistant and told to smile while handing it over. He's still responsible for their bad decisions, though, and I hope he knocks some heads together over this one.

      So, I agree that this is overblown, but sometimes good intentions are not enough to get over inexperience. He's *got* to get his shit together. The Democrats may have been out of office for 8 years, but its not like all their executive/diplomatic types died or something. I may not agree with their policies, but they at least seemed to sort of know what they were doing when Mr. Clinton was in office.

    24. Re:who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the point is Obama's choice of gifts show the depth of thought of the average high school student which most consider as a negative indicator of the new administration - not that it could have gone down hill from last time though.

    25. Re:who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It appears your binge drinking hasn't worn off yet. Googling "Bush diplomatic gift" turned up exactly 0 stories in the first 10 pages of results that were about a Bush mistake. I stopped after 10. I'll let you unemployed drunks look further.

      And from the looks of it, Barry is sucking big time now.

    26. Re:who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It takes a veteran slashdotter to not recognize the appropriateness of a walking stick inscribed with the Ten Commandments.

      And is the fact the Gordon Brown decided not to purchase a nearly $1000 jacket supposed to be significant?

    27. Re:who cares? by tsm_sf · · Score: 1

      I crack up every time I think about those gifts. I can just see the thought bubble over Obama's head as he opens his package first...

      And it's not like this hasn't happened to all of us at one point or another:
      "Here's a gift certificate to Chili's."
      "Here's a hand-knitted sweater I worked on for two years"

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    28. Re:who cares? by euxneks · · Score: 1

      Giving a gift is tarnishing America's image? Seriously?

      With Bush, it was more the wilful, and blissful, ignorance of politics external to the US than giving a cheapo gift

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    29. Re:who cares? by jackspenn · · Score: 1

      We're pointing out that he is an idiot just like Bush. I guess all recent presidents appear to be equally retarded. I mean the mistatements by Obama that get passed over by media are comparable to ones Dubya made. I wish you could recoginize we traded the one village idiot for a town fool. My favorite Obama statement has to be "I have been to 57 states so far." Awesome.

      --
      Respect the Constitution
    30. Re:who cares? by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      It takes a veteran slashdotter to not recognize the appropriateness of a walking stick inscribed with the Ten Commandments.

      And is the fact the Gordon Brown decided not to purchase a nearly $1000 jacket supposed to be significant?

      Ohh, let's see: a lame walking stick with the Protestant version of the 10C for the pope, and a tacky leather jacket for a stuffy suit and tie brit - yeah, that shows some thought by Dubya. And all it took was a AC to miss that.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    31. Re:who cares? by db32 · · Score: 1

      Lucky for most of us that it doesn't turn out to be some international incident due to a bunch of morons equating gift giving among diplomats as important foreign relations things. The real gifts happen behind the scenes and are worth FAR more than any DVD set or fancy pen could ever hold a candle to. Oh well... I guess that is how everyone keeps winding up with shitty ass leaders world wide.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    32. Re:who cares? by soliptic · · Score: 1

      We can't have positive foreign relations with Britain because the POTUS didn't give a government visitor fancy enough gifts?

      Don't sweat it. The Telegraph is a paper aimed at people who love to try and pretend the UK is still the major imperial power it was in the 19th century, obviously they're going to... how do you say it... get their panties in a twist about some stupid shit like this. The Times is kind of similar but with added Murdoch evil. And the Sun is a joke of a tabloid. I don't think anybody normal looked at this "incident" and let it affect their view of the US or the POTUS.

    33. Re:who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you notice, before you went off on your biased rant, that Obama gave the Queen a rare, signed book by one of her favorite composers? That is an incredibly thoughtful gift. That was in the very next sentence in the summary! But of course, in your dishonest zeal, you probably missed that.

    34. Re:who cares? by Raysylvon · · Score: 1

      Raysylvon@gmail.com

      Yes we got to know these things lol.

      The preachers all ware rolex watches.

      The Queen should have given President Obama one too for his oritory skills.

    35. Re:who cares? by Raysylvon · · Score: 1

      RaySylvon I do because i like president Obama and the Queen. by the way i noticed you commented lol.

    36. Re:who cares? by Raysylvon · · Score: 1

      Raysylvon, alittle tid-bit of imformation the president's of the U.S. had the clamps put on them a number of years ago that they can only recieve gifts up to a cetain dollar amount in value.

    37. Re:who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Obama's gave Her Majesty and The Prince Phillip the best gift of all........not having to spend half an hour making small (and I mean real small) talk with George W. Bush.

    38. Re:who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually, Bush's gift to the Queen was extremely well done. Queen Elizabeth has loved horses since she was a little girl.

    39. Re:who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People ARE interested in the main news. Things like this prove a nice distraction sometimes.

  7. Whats wrong with the Zune!!!! by Freaky+Spook · · Score: 1

    I know its not April fools anymore but it still seems more appropriate, considering our economic climate.

  8. Had to be ... by KwKSilver · · Score: 4, Funny

    Had to be an iPod, not a Zune: Her Majesty has far too much gravitas to run around "squirting" people.

    --
    If you want your life to be different, live it differently.
    1. Re:Had to be ... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Didn't she already have an iPod? I'm fairly sure I recall a few comedians joking that she employed a butler to change tracks on it for her after the last slow news day. Maybe it's a newer model...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Had to be ... by Pascal+Sartoretti · · Score: 1

      Had to be an iPod, not a Zune: Her Majesty has far too much gravitas to run around "squirting" people.

      Remember also that Zunes are only sold in North America, she might have a problem just to plug the AC converter into a 230 V wall plug...

    3. Re:Had to be ... by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      My guess is that she owns twenty of them, and that she's never actually seen one. All she hears is the nice music that's playing from the tastefully hidden speakers in whatever room she's in at the time.

  9. The iPod will be taken apart ... by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    After all, would ANY government allow one of their top people to accept an electronic gift without it being checked to make sure it's not bugged? That would be a serious security lapse.

    1. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Who says they didn't check it?

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      The queen has no role in the security status of her government. so unless Obama is looking to cash in on some tabloid photos taken from the secret camera in the ipod... I think no one will worry.

    3. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      After all, would ANY government allow one of their top people to accept an electronic gift without it being checked to make sure it's not bugged? That would be a serious security lapse.

      I'm sure the iPod was checked over, but how thoroughly and by whom is anyone's guess. It's important to realize that the U.S. and the U.K. are close allies, so generally the iPod would be trusted by the Crown's security. I'm sure before that iPod got anywhere near President Obama, the Secret Service thoroughly examined and screened the device for explosives, biological and chemical agents. That's just standard procedure.

    4. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by CmdrGravy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You remember that warehouse at the end of Indiana Jones where they store the Ark Of The Covenant ?

      The Queen has a similar warehouse where all the presents the monarchs have been given over the last 300 years or so are stored, this I-Pod is never going to be used.

    5. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by Ragzouken · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, I heard it was going to be examined by top men.

    6. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by Asic+Eng · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The queen regularly discusses political matters with the prime minister. The prime minister is not required to do anything she says, but by talking to her has access to a person who has talked to his predecessors and has therefore considerable knowledge. So the queen does have some informal power, and tapping into these conversations could in principle be interesting for a foreign power.

    7. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      Who says they didn't check it?

      Who says the "Queen" is part of the government?

      Sure, she has a role, but it's not like she's making the battle plan for Afghanistan or anything.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    8. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That shouldn't be restricted to electronic gifts.

      IIRC the Russians gave some indoor water fountain to a pretty important agency during the cold war and they accepted the gift. Much, much later did they find out that inside, there was a battery, eavesdropping equipment and a transmitter and thus the Russians had been able to get a lot of information since they - quite cleverly - had assumed that people would stop there chat when they met coworkers in the hallway.

      Unfortunately I don't remember all the details but it was in a documentary about spying during the cold war - maybe someone else knows more and can elaborate.

    9. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by nojayuk · · Score: 5, Informative
      "The queen has no role in the security status of her government."

      She has a face-to-face meeting with the Prime Minister, the senior elected official of Her Majesty's Government once a week to talk about Britain and he Commonwealth, its current state and its place in the world. She receives a box of State papers every day to work through -- as Head of State she signs off on all treaties and international agreements negotiated between the UK and other countries.

      She's been doing this for more than fifty years now, day in day out, week in week out. She's heard everything, the good news and the bad. Apart from the anodyne Christmas address to the nation she keeps her mouth shut about it, as it is her duty to do so.

    10. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by jabithew · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Queen owns the government, she is not part of it. Hence, Her Majesty's Government, as well as Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition.

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    11. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by slashdotmsiriv · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure the queen does not really know about any important political or defense issues, but
      the Royal family itself is a national security issue.

      The last the Brits need is foreign spooks eavesdropping on their first family's dirty laundry. Think of the blackmailing possibilities!

    12. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by noidentity · · Score: 2, Funny

      The iPod will be taken apart ...

      It's OK; they would have had to take it apart anyway to replace the battery at some point.

    13. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by Twillerror · · Score: 1

      Talk about eating your crumpets and having them to.

    14. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make a good point. However, the fact is this will go straight into storage and the Queen will never use it (apart from anything else, she prefers a Shuffle William bought her).

    15. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by AndersOSU · · Score: 2, Funny

      agreed.

      The blackmail-the-royals market needs to remain a domestic business.

    16. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by russotto · · Score: 1

      After all, would ANY government allow one of their top people to accept an electronic gift without it being checked to make sure it's not bugged? That would be a serious security lapse.

      Or they'll just keep it in a non-sensitive area, so all the NSA will learn is the Queen's favorite tea. I seriously doubt it's bugged (too much chance of an international incident if it were discovered, and too little to gain), but you're probably right that UK counterintelligence wouldn't take the chance.

    17. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Who?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    18. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Top.
      Men.

    19. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by twostix · · Score: 1

      I'd love to see her try and assert that ownership.

      She's just tradition and well knows her place.

    20. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      She's not a "top person." She's a celebutard like Britney or Lohan or whoever. She is not an elected leader; she's an entertainer.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    21. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by xelah · · Score: 1

      Sure the queen does not really know about any important political or defense issues

      Actually, she might. She has a weekly meeting with the PM. No-one knows what they talk about but I'm sure some of it will be sensitive, especially what is technically her army is fighting a war.

      I imagine she doesn't take her iPod with her, however.

    22. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by thirty-seven · · Score: 1

      Sure, she has a role, but it's not like she's making the battle plan for Afghanistan or anything.

      She has regular private discussions with the prime minister of the UK, where they presumably and traditionally discuss some sensitive government/political topics, and also infrequent private meetings with her other prime ministers.

      --

      Atheism is a religion to the same extent that not collecting stamps is a hobby.

    23. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by thirty-seven · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, she might. She has a weekly meeting with the PM. No-one knows what they talk about but I'm sure some of it will be sensitive, especially what is technically her army is fighting a war.

      Indeed. Winston Churchill said, after the fact of course, that King George (Queen Elizabeth's father) was one of the very, very few people with whom he would discuss all the secret plans and his thoughts about the war.

      --

      Atheism is a religion to the same extent that not collecting stamps is a hobby.

    24. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by muntis · · Score: 1

      You didn't know? She is phase shifting reptilian, ruling the world. So intelligence is very important

    25. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by hajus · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the commonwealth states (that used to be part of the British empire), there is the queen's representative, the governor general. The governor general is the one that dissolves parliament when a minority government loses a vote of confidence and then a new parliament election has to take place. At the end of 2008, the governor general in Canada locked the doors of parliament rather than allow a new election, which was within her power. The office is not an elected office, but is appointed, and then authorized by the queen of England. So the queen wields some small power in all the countries that are part of the British commonwealth, rather than just England.

    26. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      Top Men.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    27. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The queen regularly discusses political matters with the prime minister.

      Brown: Well, Liz, there's been quite a few riots since Obama's arrived. It's all this G20 bumf, I just don't know...
      Lizzie: Do you want some cake with your tea?
      Brown: Err, no, thank you.
      Lizzie: Do take a bit more cake.

    28. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by mike2R · · Score: 4, Interesting

      heh, take a glance over a British military forum someday. I *think* they're mostly joking, but it seems to be the general group fantasy to receive orders from The Palace to march on the House of Commons with bayonets fixed :) The current government is not popular in military circles, to put it mildly; if Gordon Brown says to the Queen "you and what army", she'd have a ready answer..

      No I'm not being serious.

      --
      This sig all sigs devours
    29. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by Workaphobia · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Has there been any documented case where this knowledge has been particularly useful or of great consequence?

      --
      Evidently, the key to understanding recursion is to begin by understanding recursion. The rest is easy.
    30. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by dadragon · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Queen of England (United Kingdom actually, there hasn't been a Queen of England since Queen Anne) has no power in Canada. The Queen of Canada does. Yes, they are the same person, but they don't have to be.

      The Queen of the United Kingdom doesn't appoint our Governor General, the Queen of Canada does, on the advice of the Canadian Prime Minister and Privy Council.

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    31. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by dadragon · · Score: 1

      The Prime Minister is not obligated to do anything the Queen says, because the Prime Minister has no power that the Queen doesn't grant him.

      Everything the government does is done with the authority of the Queen. In theory she can take it away with no notice.

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    32. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by dadragon · · Score: 1

      An "entertainer" with more power in her pinky in her country than the President of the United States in his.

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    33. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by Golddess · · Score: 1

      Sure, at one point in history that may have been true, but I was under the impression that the queen was just a figurehead now?

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    34. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you haven't seen it you should watch this daily show sketch.

    35. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by gknoy · · Score: 1

      She may be "effectively" a figurehead, but at the same time her subjects are (I imagine) fiercely loyal to her -- both as a symbol and as a person. I imagine many Brits would be willing to fight and die to preserve her status as "figurehead". Her power comes not from the fact that she directly makes laws (I could be wrong on this, of course), but that if she said, "We should do X", her nation will take steps to do it.

    36. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Her power comes not from the fact that she directly makes laws (I could be wrong on this, of course), but that if she said, "We should do X", her nation will take steps to do it.

      This is entirely true, so long as she never actually does. The Queen is carefully and studiously apolitical; I mean, she's rich and traditionalist and surely she is personally a conservative, but she never makes statements of any kind that side with one party over another. Simply not the done thing. The Queen is supposed to be above all that. Governments come and governments go, but the Queen remains and so do the institutions of the state which govern in her name. It's about continuity, and it's a big part of why it's possible for an election to be held on Thursday and a new Prime Minister to begin work in Downing Street on Friday morning: all the Sir Humphreys in the back rooms who arrange for things to actually happen work for the Crown, not for the ministers of government who have the executive power.

      I think the only real power the Queen has is the power to name a Prime Minister and invite him to form a government. Normally she will choose whichever MP is leader of the majority party in the House of Commons. Occasionally there is no majority party, and it is unclear which of the competing leaders has the ability to form a majority coalition: in this case the Queen chooses.

      There's also the weekly meeting with the Prime Minister which others here have mentioned, at which she can advise the leader of her government. It's these meetings that any rival power would dearly love to eavesdrop. What is discussed is private, except for what little various Prime Ministers have revealed long afterwards over the years; the Queen herself has never to my knowledge breathed a word of any of it.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    37. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Interesting. Has there been any documented case where this knowledge has been particularly useful or of great consequence?

      I doubt such a thing ever would be documented. Policy is made collectively by the Cabinet, who take joint responsibility, and the minutes will show only that the Prime Minister said this and that the Minister of Defence said that and that the Minister of Health said the other, and whether or not the Queen's advice had influenced things would go quite unrecorded. So far as I know the Prime Minister's meetings with the Queen are entirely private and unminuted.

      The main advantage I imagine is not so much that the Queen's advice may influence policy - the Prime Minister has any number of specialist advisers who are better informed on their topic of expertise than the Queen. No, it's probably more that the Prime Minister can explain himself to someone whose security clearance is infinite, whose reliability is axiomatic, and who has in all probability heard it all before half a dozen times. Often in explaining a problem completely and openly to somebody else, things become a good deal clearer. A secular confessional for a person who by the nature of his work likely has a whole lot to confess.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    38. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      Top men.

    39. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The key flaw in the system is that it requires a monarch with good sense and the ability to know when to shut up. Problem thy name is Charles.

    40. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by cwike · · Score: 1

      well, I have a feeling that the queen will refer to the iPod as "the thing" (also strictly speaking it is a listening device)

    41. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1

      The Brits like to pretend they are a monarchy, but in reality they are not. The prime minister writes the queen's speech and she reads it out loud - it's hard to show more clearly who submits to whom. The queen is quite aware that all power she has in theory would evaporate if she tried to use it in practice. Everything the government does is done with the authority of the people - they put the queen's stamp on it, because it looks nicer.

    42. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by dadragon · · Score: 1

      I think you're right to a point. If the Queen just up and decided to become an autocrat the people wouldn't stand for it. On the other hand, if the Queen dismisses a Parliament because they're becoming totalitarian themselves the people might appreciate it... as long as new elections were called right away.

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    43. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by thirty-seven · · Score: 1

      The Brits like to pretend they are a monarchy, but in reality they are not.

      Actually, I think that Americans like to pretend that they know what the meanings of the words "monarchy" and "republic" are, but they do not.

      Too many of them like to pretend that "monarchy" means "absolute monarchy", "democracy" means "direct Athenian-style democracy", and "republic" means "constitutional representative democracy with separation of powers". Which leads to claims like "Britain isn't really a monarchy" or "you are a subject not a citizen" (as if the two were mutually exclusive) or "the United States is a republic, not a democracy".

      --

      Atheism is a religion to the same extent that not collecting stamps is a hobby.

    44. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1
      Maybe so, but #1 I'm not American, and #2 - before ERII Britain was a constitutional monarchy, but now that's really no longer the case. Yes there is still a monarch, there are funny costumes and cool ceremonies. Still - at some point you have to say if your country's form of government is 99.3% democracy and 0.7% monarchy - calling yourself a monarchy is not the most accurate of statements anymore. Obviously that doesn't mean it's not your prerogative, but I respectfully disagree.

      Regardless - the British "crown in parliament" system is vastly superior to presidential systems IMHO - the way it evolved out of an ordinary medieval monarchy is a great historic achievement.

      Regarding your comments regarding subject vs citizens: in 1983 the British Nationality Act came into force. There are some technicalities, but if you have a British passport today, you are very likely a British citizen and not a subject of her majesty. Congrats.

    45. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      The Queen of England (United Kingdom actually, there hasn't been a Queen of England since Queen Anne) has no power in Canada. The Queen of Canada does. Yes, they are the same person, but they don't have to be.

      Yes it has long been my thought that rather than rewriting the Australian constitution along presidential lines we should just tweak the rules for selecting the next monarch. The possibilities are (almost) endless.

    46. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by dadragon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my personal opinion is that we (Canada) should rewrite the rules of succession so that the Privy Council elects the next monarch. Monarch rules for life, dies, then Privy Council is called to elect the next one. In theory that's not much different than what happens now, where the Council is called to approve the new monarch.

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    47. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by thirty-seven · · Score: 1

      Well, it seems that I agree with you 99%. I just don't consider there to be any reason to consider "monarchy" and "democracy" to be mutually exclusive. Britain is ~100% democracy and ~100% monarchy. I think that a meaningful description of the UK is something like "unitary parliamentary democratic constitutional monarchy", whereas the US is a "federal presidential democratic constitutional republic" and Canada is a "federal parliamentary democratic constitutional monarchy".

      --

      Atheism is a religion to the same extent that not collecting stamps is a hobby.

    48. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      no wonder she doesn't want Charles to advance to the throne.

  10. Good thing we Slashdotted it! by cyberspittle · · Score: 1

    Yep. good thing.

  11. Brown responded... by langelgjm · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mr. Brown gave Mr. Obama a pen holder carved from the timber of an anti-slave ship, receiving in return a DVD box set of American movies, igniting a torrent of criticism in the British press.

    Brown, commenting on the matter, said: "I've already downloaded most of these on the Pirate Bay."

    --
    "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    1. Re:Brown responded... by ubrgeek · · Score: 5, Funny

      Her Majesty, commenting on the matter, said, "No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame."

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    2. Re:Brown responded... by rgo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thnk yu for mking me spit my c0ffee sir!
      Yu 0we me a new keybrd!

    3. Re:Brown responded... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks.
      Your comment is frame-worthy.

    4. Re:Brown responded... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr. Brown gave Mr. Obama a pen holder carved from the timber of an anti-slave ship, receiving in return a DVD box set of American movies, igniting a torrent of criticism in the British press.

      It did create quite a stir as the DVD had Pirates of the Caribbean IV

    5. Re:Brown responded... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Thnk yu for mking me spit my c0ffee sir!
      Yu 0we me a new keybrd!

      How the feck did you hit the "o" and miss the "0"?

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    6. Re:Brown responded... by rgo · · Score: 1

      targetted spitting

  12. DRM by simonbas · · Score: 0

    Am I wrong of you can only see the content of the iPod on the computer from which it has been transferred from?

    Giving crippled DRM to heads of state, that's the new American diplomacy..."Hey here's a gift for you...wait...oh sorry, you'll have to break the DMCA to use it..."

    1. Re:DRM by v1 · · Score: 1

      actually when you plug in an ipod to a different computer, and open itunes, you can see all the music on the ipod. You just can't drag and drop it FROM the ipod (copy it) to the computer.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    2. Re:DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kind of hard to "break" the DMCA when she's the head of another country altogether.

    3. Re:DRM by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      I really don't think the Queen of England would have to worry much about a US law. I imagine that even while visiting the US she has diplomatic immunity the likes of which are only depicted in the movies.

    4. Re:DRM by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      But isn't the President "making content available"?

    5. Re:DRM by jrothwell97 · · Score: 1

      ...unless the database marks songs as being purchased from the iTunes Music Store, in which case the purchases can easily be transferred to a computer (right-click the iPod, select 'transfer purchases').

      Alternatively, third-party tools as Floola will indiscriminately copy from the iPod, regardless of whether or not they were purchased from the iTMS.

      --
      Those using pirated Tinysoft signatures(TM) are a real threat to society and should all be thrown in jail.
    6. Re:DRM by Mursk · · Score: 1

      When the president does it, it's not illegal.

      --
      "This thing does science so hard, you say, 'I've never seen that much science.'" -Sam
    7. Re:DRM by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      When the president does it, it's not illegal.

      "Tricky"

    8. Re:DRM by Amnenth · · Score: 1

      Although you'd have to use twice as much disk to do it, you can both sync the content to the iPod and store a second copy of everything in a sensible directory structure that could be easily copied off to a new machine, as well.

      And yes, there are tools to retrieve things from the libraries of non-iPhone/iTouch 'pods as well, though I don't know any myself.

  13. Royal Navy anti slavery actions by Hal_Porter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There's a good article here

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/abolition/royal_navy_article_01.shtml

    It's actually an incredibly cool story.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    1. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      According to Flashman the slave trade was largely eliminated by high spirited boys for the sheer fun of it.

    2. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by mspohr · · Score: 3, Informative
      This is actually a more complex story. The Royal Navy first started by supporting and defending the slave trade in 1562. The Royal Navy was very 'entrepreneurial' in those days.

      In 1632 King Charles of England gave out charters to support the slave trade. Up to three million Africans had been transported in British ships since 1650, and at the end of the 18th century Britain was dominating the trade, with an average of more than 150 slave ships leaving Liverpool, Bristol, and London each year. This made Britain very rich.

      There were people who realized that the slave trade was an abomination against human rights and they started a campaign against it. By 1807, Britain was forced to outlaw the practice and the Royal Navy had to enforce the new law but this was difficult because of the huge profits. The slave trade continued through 1880.

      In light of the wealth that Britain received from the slave trade, it probably would have been more appropriate for Gordon Brown to give Obama a gift made from a slave trade ship (this gift would be less hypocritical but probably would not be appropriate). Britain has yet to seriously discuss reparations for the damage done to Africa from the profits they made in the slave trade.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    3. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the link. Living in a land-locked country with no history of slave trade at all, I wondered at first whether an "anti-slave ship" was a ship transporting antimatter slaves or a rocket cruiser armed with sea-to-slave missiles.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by Richard_at_work · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Britain has yet to seriously discuss reparations for the damage done to Africa from the profits they made in the slave trade.

      And I seriously hope we never do, not because I agree with slavery, but because I disagree with being held accountable for something that someone did 200 years ago.

    5. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by jabithew · · Score: 5, Informative

      I see that you, along with all romantics, have entirely neglected the role that Africans themselves played in the slave trade. Slaves traded across the Atlantic were bought from African dealers. I have yet to see any Afro-Americans demanding apologies from Africans, let alone reparations.

      Britain was one of the first nations to abolish this hideous practice (by democratic choice, not "force"), before any African nation did, and Britain did more than most to bring an end to it. Even after the Atlantic slave trade was brought to a halt by the British and later American navies, innocent Africans were being sold into slavery by Africans to Arabs. Yet still Britain seems to have the majority of the blame for the slave trade forced upon it. This seems deeply unfair to me.

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    6. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by noidentity · · Score: 1
    7. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by CmdrGravy · · Score: 5, Funny

      I agree and since the British government is unwilling to make reparations I as a British citizen am more than happy to do so on their behalf.

      Obviously all the people actually involved are dead now so there is nothing I can do for them so it's their ancestors I feel I must recompense.

      I have a simple formula, all we need to do it work out the average yearly income of American African Americans and the average income of Africans to get a figure of how much worse off the African Americans are. Then multilply that by the average lifespan of an African American and the number of them who can prove their ancestors were slaves.

      I'll accept payment in gold bullion.

    8. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by elfprince13 · · Score: 1

      Watch Amazing Grace (the 2006 film). It stars Ioan Gruffudd as William Wilberforce

    9. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have yet to see any Afro-Americans demanding apologies from Africans, let alone reparations.

      Because they don't have any money. That's what it's all about at the end of the day. I've yet to understand how giving money to the descendants of slaves repairs the damage that was done by the slave trade, but there you go.

      My bloodline includes Native American, Polish, Jewish and German ancestry (typical American mutt here I suppose). When do I get my rent check for this nice continent my ancestors "gave" you? When do I get my check from Germany for all the damage done to my Polish and Jewish ancestors? When do I get my check from the British and Americans to make up for Dresden?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    10. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by elfprince13 · · Score: 1

      You should check out the 2006 film Amazing Grace, based on the life of William Wilberforce.

    11. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Britain has yet to seriously discuss reparations for the damage done to Africa from the profits they made in the slave trade.

      Britain has already paid Africa for the slave trade, at a fair price agreeable to both parties. Who do you think the British bought all those slaves from in the first place?

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    12. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Britain has yet to seriously discuss reparations for the damage done to Africa from the profits they made in the slave trade.

      And North Africa have still not paid reparations for the Nordic slaves they bought: The Turkish Abductions

      All countries have a dark history. No one should have to pay for what crimes their ancestors committed.

    13. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by Inda · · Score: 2, Informative

      Clap. Clap. Clap.

      I knew this. I spout it occasionally. No one likes to listen, especially my black mates after they start their chip-on-the-shoulder rants. People can't seem to understand that a small handful of English would have been easily overrun by masses of Africans. Without the help of the Africans, the slave trade wouldn't have happened.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    14. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by furby076 · · Score: 1

      Britain has yet to seriously discuss reparations for the damage done to Africa from the profits they made in the slave trade.

      Find me a living slave, or hell at least their kids or grand-kids, from what Britain did 200 years ago and we can discuss reparations.

      --

      I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
    15. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Informative

      Obama is not descended from slaves! I know this is true of most black Americans, but it is NOT true of Obama! He has no more relationship with the slavery than any of you cube-dwelling white boys!

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    16. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but you have no problem whatsoever enjoying the benefits...

    17. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by krunk7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's what it's all about at the end of the day. I've yet to understand how giving money to the descendants of slaves repairs the damage that was done by the slave trade, but there you go.

      I can explain this for you. I know they don't really teach this in schools in as much detail as they should.

      Slavery was not fully abolished, technically, until 1865. Now, that sounds like a long time ago. Over 100 years. But what happened after that? Well for 100 years, blacks were not allowed to go to the same schools with whites, they weren't allowed to live by whites, they weren't allowed to meaningfully interact with whites, they're vote was actively negated through Jim Crow laws, and they weren't even allowed to drink the same water.

      Let me repeat that lest the math was not clear, they were actively and openly oppressed, exploited, violently attacked by both private vigilanties and law enforcement, and disenfranchised until 1965 . That means if you're 43 or over, you were alive then. It also means your parents were almost assuredly alive and could either tell tales of fighting for or against the Civil Rights movement unless you're very young.

      What does this mean really? I'm sure the response is "Well, I didnt' do any of that!". This is true, but the entire American society did that. Laws aren't passed by individuals, they are passed by nations. Widespread discrimination of that calibar is not commited by individuals, it's sanctioned by states. And so, it is society that owes a debt.

      It was not African American's Great Great Great Grandparents that were shoved into ghettos, educationally marginalized, disenfranchised, and openly, violently opposed. Those who experienced this first hand are still alive today as are those who perpetrated these grave crimes against humanity.

      The audacity to presume that in less than one full generation 300 years of this stature of oppression would simply *poof* disappear. Do you really think that all the fathers and grandfathers who were so sure that blacks were less than human in their teens, 20's, and 30's all of a sudden did a 180 and changed their attitudes? It takes more than 1/2 a generation to repair that kind of dehumanization.

      And to compare this to Dresden. Are you completely daft? Are you truly that ignorant of the difference (not in a hateful sense, but in the literal sense of igorance)? Dresden was a single event in a war that spanned a few years. The decendents of dresden were not stripped of their heritage, educational opportunities, and identity. Forced into slavery, shoved into ghettos, hanged from trees, and treated verbally and physically like animals for 15 generations .

      Just ponder that for a moment. Just think of the significance, of the impact that has on a culture. I am amazed that the black community is so forgiving. That the sons (literally) of those our nation abused so egregiously are not absolutely raving with desire for revenge. That they're recovering so quickly economically, educationally, and culturally.

      No, it is not one individual that owes a debt, the entire country owes a debt.

      Now, I don't think monetary reperations are the right way to make amends. Mainly, because the harm is nigh incalculable. But if it were possible to guarantee a free ride to every black child to a first class college to give them the opportunity to pull their communities out of the ghettos that our nation put them in then that might be a good start. Of course, we probably can't afford that either.

      The solution is not easy, nor is it simple, nor is it cheap. But your indignation is misplaced, misguided, and misinformed.

    18. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      But if it were possible to guarantee a free ride to every black child to a first class college

      Because that won't create any resentment whatsoever among the 90% of the population that isn't getting such treatment. Let's give special treatment to a specific subset of the population because of past injustices and ignore the injustices created in current times by doing so. What could possibly go wrong?

      But your indignation is misplaced, misguided, and misinformed.

      Because I don't favor special treatment to make up for past injustices? Guilty as charged I guess.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    19. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not quite true :
      as a great great great great great grandson of a slave trader I live in a big house that was build with slavemoney.....I did not do the crime and do not feel responsible, but am wealthy because of it !!!

      (it's a very big historic building and if I were to sell it I would get a good price even in a 'downturn' :)

    20. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by Seng · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that the Roman's practiced slavery all across Europe before any Africans ever were sold into bondage.

      Let's kick it up a notch... Since I'm of German and English heritage, I demand reparations from Italy for what their conquerors did 2000+ years ago.

    21. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by krunk7 · · Score: 1

      Nope, you're absolutely right. I don't think we could. But if we could provide that benefit without taking the opportunity from someone else, it would be a good start. Exactly what injustice is perpetrated by filling another chair in a classroom? I've never, in my 7 years attending and 4 years working at various universities not been able to sit in on any class I wanted to. What harm is perpetrated against that 90% by allowing another child to sit in a chair that otherwise would have been empty? The only harm I could see is a perceived harm that doesn't exist in reality or is very minimal in its impact.

      Though sometimes perceptions can be as detrimental as realities. . .

      I think the best way to approach the issue is to focus on socio economic class rather than race. It's a fact that students who attend under funded school's will not perform as well on the entry tests as those who attend the best funded schools. The poor score is not a reflection of the student's potential, but their past opportunity. Universities already adjust for this to a degree, but I think the degree should be more. I've tutored in inner city schools and I attended a very, very tiny rural high school. For differing reasons, the educational opportunities are very impoverished. . . much more so in inner city schools (e.g. one book per class).

      Another good start would be eliminating Jim Crow'sh type laws that still exist today in the realm of education. For example, few people know that the vast majority of a public school's funding comes from local property taxes. The consequence is that poor neighborhoods have shitty schools which provide shitty k-12 education placing the students at an inherent disadvantage and increasing the likelihood that they'll remain poor. This is why you can have a school whose students don't have the basic learning materials they need and just a district over in the posh, upper class subdivision you have one of the top ranked high schools in the nation.

      These practices are no different than the districting and forced segregation that happened just a couple of decades ago, though the target is "the poor" that just so happens to be a vastly black demographic.

      Sorry for the long reply, I know you were aiming for a nice 5s sound byte rebuttal but the issue is not that simple.

    22. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      >And I seriously hope we never do, not because I agree with slavery, but because I disagree with being held accountable for something that someone did 200 years ago.

      I seriously hope you do, not because I agree with handouts, but because I disagree with being able to smugly sit on ill-gained profits without materially admitting to wrongdoing until the clock has run out. [ In other words, fess up, pay ONCE, move on. ] The reason you're still being accused now, 200 years later, is that everyone *in between* then and now refused to be held accountable.

    23. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by toiletsalmon · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I know this has been modded as "Funny", but when I think about my ancestors getting the living shit kicked out of them and being forced to work all day and then being feed nasty food, I just don't really feel like laughing. When I think about my grandmother being spat on as a little girl just because of the color of her skin, I don't really feel like laughing. When I think about all the times I was called "Nigger Boy" as a kid, and then told to "ignore it" or "laugh it off", I don't really feel like laughing.

      But yeah:

      "Yuk! Yuk! Yuk! Have Black People send ME Money! Yuk! Yuk! Yuk!"

      Actually, now that I think about it: "You're an asshole."

    24. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Britain has yet to seriously discuss reparations for the damage done to Africa from the profits they made in the slave trade.

      So Britain should pay reparations for buying slaves, to the country that sold the slaves? I'd suggest that by buying the slaves from Africa, Africa has already received reparation. The slave trade was wrong, and Africa's enslavement of its people was wrong. But I really don't see why Britain should pay Africa any more. If anywhere, money should go to the families of former-slaves that were shipped to the New World, amongst other places.

    25. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I have yet to see any Afro-Americans demanding apologies from Africans, let alone reparations.

      devil's advocate for a moment: consider the differences in the years between the slaving and today: the african traders didn't get any lasting wealth; they're dead, their nations fell and/or were colonized, and all that they did in life fell to ruin over a century ago. Compare and contrast to slaving ship owners and plantation owners who got rich and passed their riches on down the generations, who have living descendants who are *still* wealthy and like to brag about all the philathropic goodness their ancestors did (with slave money).

      In the British case, claiming so much credit for ending the slave trade (that they'd done so much to promote, and profited so greatly from) *but keeping the colonies* and now, today, still promoting the good old days of the mighty British Empire...

    26. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by laddiebuck · · Score: 1

      Thank you very much for pointing this out. I usually do so when the slavery issue and demand for reparations comes up, but it seems the proportion of rational folk to the sentimental is very small indeed.

    27. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It bothers me too, but you need to be a little more careful. He may have ancestors who were slaves. The important point is Kenya wasn't connected in any way to the American slave trade. However, as someone pointed out, this wasn't really a gift to Obama, but to the White House and is similar to the desk (made from another anti-slaver ship).

    28. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by jopsen · · Score: 0

      Britain has yet to seriously discuss reparations for the damage done to Africa from the profits they made in the slave trade.

      And I seriously hope we never do, not because I agree with slavery, but because I disagree with being held accountable for something that someone did 200 years ago.

      Britain has yet to seriously discuss reparations for the damage done to Africa from the profits they made in the slave trade.

      I'm pretty sure most Europeans would laugh of such as suggestion too... :)

      I'm not even dependent on my parents for my education, why in the world should we hold ourselves responsible for stuff that happened hundreds of years ago... When we have a system where we attempt to give children the same opportunities no matter how drunk, broken and stupid their parents are...

    29. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by C4Cypher · · Score: 1

      My extended family immigrated to the US from Ireland after the Civil war ended. What specifically am I to be held accountable for?

    30. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      What harm is perpetrated against that 90% by allowing another child to sit in a chair that otherwise would have been empty?

      On what grounds would it have been empty?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    31. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by caluml · · Score: 1

      Well, racism is bad, and I'm sorry you were called names, endured abuse. But you can't ask someone to apologise for something that some people of the same race did centuries ago. To me, that's almost a form of racism. "You're white, therefore you were part of the problem."

    32. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by caluml · · Score: 1

      There was an interesting program on UK TV - a black chef, Ainsley Harriot, traced his past back, and found out that some (one?) of his ancestors were actually slave traders. It shocked him, too. It's not always so ... dare I say it ... black and white.

    33. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by mspohr · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So your logic seems to be that slavery is OK if you pay someone of the same race/location to help you round up slaves. By this logic, if you pay a white person to capture another local white person, it fine to sell them on into slavery.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    34. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by cbciv · · Score: 1

      It was rated as funny because the g.p. used an unexpected twist to point out a fact that is often overlooked in the discussion of the results of slavery in Europe, the U.S. and Canada. That twist registers in the human brain as humor.

      You're certainly entitled to resent and be angered by the treatment that your ancestors suffered as a result of slavery and that you and your family have suffered as a result of racism. IMO slavery may be the worst crime that humans have ever dreamed up to commit on one another.

      Nonetheless, the point that the descendants of slaves living in Europe, the U.S. and Canada may be better off in terms of standard of living, health care and left expectancy isn't invalid. It's arguable (the life expectancy for African American men is appalling, for example) and in no way justifies the barbarity of slavery or the way that the U.S. has treated their descendants since[1], but it shouldn't be dismissed without consideration in an argument about reparations; one of the most frequent justifications for paying reparations now is the current social-economic status of the descendants of slaves relative to the rest of the population. If that's fair game, why not the g.p.'s point?

      [1] I don't know enough about the issues in Canada or Europe to comment.

    35. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by krunk7 · · Score: 1

      On what grounds would it have been empty?

      Admittedly mostly anecdotal.

      Exactly what injustice is perpetrated by filling another chair in a classroom? I've never, in my 7 years attending and 4 years working at various universities not been able to sit in on any class I wanted to.

      However, most any university student would tell you the same. It's common knowledge and encouraged to sit in on classes (they call it "auditing" :) ) and I haven't heard of hardly anyone not being able to due to a lack of seats.

      It'd be a much better rebuttal to point out that the cost of a student at a university is not solely determined by the seat they sit in. ;)

    36. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      But if we could provide that benefit without taking the opportunity from someone else, it would be a good start.

      No, that's not a good start, because you are still choosing to give special treatment to some selected group. You are attempting to make up for past (or even ongoing) injustices by creating more injustice. Personally, I don't regard that as a particularly good idea.

      I think the best way to approach the issue is to focus on socio economic class rather than race.

      So the person who isn't from a disadvantaged socio-economic class gets punished if he winds up with the same scores as someone who is and is competing for a limited resource? How the hell is that fair?

      Universities already adjust for this to a degree, but I think the degree should be more

      And I think it should be less.

      For example, few people know that the vast majority of a public school's funding comes from local property taxes.

      What do you mean "few" people know this? Virtually everybody who owns property is aware of this. Why are you assuming that most people don't realize this simple fact?

      The consequence is that poor neighborhoods have shitty schools which provide shitty k-12 education placing the students at an inherent disadvantage and increasing the likelihood that they'll remain poor.

      So what do you want to do about it? Further centralize the educational system and make it even less accountable to the people that it's meant to serve?

      Another good start would be eliminating Jim Crow'sh type laws that still exist today in the realm of education

      Hyperbole much?

      These practices are no different than the districting and forced segregation that happened just a couple of decades ago, though the target is "the poor" that just so happens to be a vastly black demographic.

      There's no "target". The concept is one of local responsbility. You may disagree with that concept and think the system should be more centralized -- that's fine, but to make the analogy with Jim Crow and imply that it's done deliberately doesn't seem particularly honest to me.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    37. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by toiletsalmon · · Score: 1

      a) I didn't mention anything about reparations. I just thought that his joke about having the descendants of slaves pay him reparations for the privilege of living in the United States was crass and insensitive.

      2) I know how humor works, dork...thanks for the explanation.

      III) And it IS an invalid point. If I rape your girlfriend/sister/mother should I get a lesser sentence because she wanted to have a baby anyway?

      Nice try though...

    38. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by krunk7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, that's not a good start, because you are still choosing to give special treatment to some selected group. You are attempting to make up for past (or even ongoing) injustices by creating more injustice. Personally, I don't regard that as a particularly good idea.

      The reason for this is the same as the one below.

      So the person who isn't from a disadvantaged socio-economic class gets punished if he winds up with the same scores as someone who is and is competing for a limited resource? How the hell is that fair?

      There's no punishment here. As I stated before, a child that manages to obtain an 80th percentile score when he went to a school that didn't even have a book for him to study has proven far more work ethic, persistence, and dedication to academia than his counterpart with the same score that wen to a school for which the only cause of poor performance is his own lack and shortcomings.

      Please pay attention to this next part: Grades alone have never been the sole determining factor of a student's admittance . A student with a 3.8 but a long list of extracurricular activities, community service, and sports is often chosen over the 4.0 student with nothing else to show. Why is it so absurd to recognize the diverse achievements of low income students as well?

      There's no "target". The concept is one of local responsbility. You may disagree with that concept and think the system should be more centralized -- that's fine, but to make the analogy with Jim Crow and imply that it's done deliberately doesn't seem particularly honest to me.

      Education is already centralized to some extent. Federal monies and state monies support schools, just not to the degree that local property taxes do. I'm not proposing a complete paradigm shift, but a change in degree.

      And yes, it is absolutely intentional. The high income neighborhoods with a more direct access to the law makers push very hard to maintain the status quo. And these laws have the same end effect on that population's participation in education as jim crow did on their participation in government.

    39. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by toiletsalmon · · Score: 1

      You need to decide what you're talking about. "Reparations" and an apology are two completely different things.

      The United States Government, and any other organization that has existed since slavery was prominent in this country MOST CERTAINLY SHOULD apologize if they benefited financially from slavery.

      If murder has no statute of limitations, I don't see why slavery should have one either.

      And what the fuck does asking for money have to do with hating white people? Nice try with the "reverse racism" argument though. That is, unless you're trying to imply that the United States Government is "Caucasian". Because if you believe that's true, I think you've just demonstrated why reparations might not be such a bad idea.

      I thought the US government was "colorless", but apparently YOU don't feel that way. Maybe I'm the one that's mis-informed...

    40. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      It *is* sad that the poster was modded funny, because he's making a very good point.

      Paying you off doesn't make you a better person or richer. Having had your ancestors be slaves didn't necessarily make you worse off than you are now.

      Sure, someone called you a nigger. Call them a whitebread, honky, redneck asshole, because that's just what he would be.

      Nevertheless, I'm not paying you because some white trash asshole can't keep his fucking mouth shut. You take that out of his own stupid white ass.

      You know if it wasn't for slavery, you *could* be at home in Africa right now, wonderful place that Africa is, and then you could then have been exploited in a variety of other ways by other people who I'm also not descended from. Most of those same people would be just as black as you.

      For that matter, if my ancestors didn't ship into port in the US, I could be in Northern Ireland, getting my ass shot off. Or maybe in Central America being buried in a mass grave for being on the wrong side of the Revolution.

      Any one of those futures could be ours if our ancestors lived different lives and managed to stay in our wonderful ancestral homelands, Gardens of Eden that they are.

      Ironic or not, there are people who come to the United States every day who choose to show up here and risk life and limb to get here. You, however, would already be here, and your ticket was paid for by the injustices done to your ancestors.

      So yeah, don't laugh it off, but be very seriously aware that life is far from over for you as a black person in the good old United States of America.

    41. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are Nigerians included in that formula?

    42. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's found out your family home was paid for with money your grandfather stole in a bank robbery, would you expect to keep it?

    43. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by toiletsalmon · · Score: 1

      You see, that's the problem with many of you "white people". Anytime someone mentions ANYTHING to do with "black people" being treated unfairly in any way, you stumble all over yourselves to say as loudly as you can "I'm not a racist, BUT..." and then you go into your "special treatment" spiel. Then you trot out your fucking immigrant story and segue into your "up by their own bootstraps" and "personal responsibility" lecture aimed towards black people.

      Not once did I say I wanted anything, or that I was unhappy about anything. Hell, I've not even stated that I think reparations are a good idea. I just said that it was a tacky fucking joke, and now I'm getting lectured left and right by a bunch of amateur sociologists.

      Jump to conclusions much? And not just you. All three of you so far.

      Jesus.Fucking.Christ!

    44. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by toiletsalmon · · Score: 1

      And another thing:

      It's painfully obvious that all is not well in the "Urban Black Community". I think we can agree on that. I've been getting all this unsolicited advice and all these fucking lectures, so if you guys know so fucking much, why don't you fix the fucking problem already?

      "We" have tried to fix the problem, but apparently what we've done so far hasn't worked. I'm sure most of "us" would be more than happy to let you take a shot at. Hell, it's not like we could really stop you anyway.

      That would have been really fucking helpful last week when those 5 assholes were shooting at each other in front of my mothers house while I was visiting there with my kids.

      And when you get done "fixing" "black people", from what I've seen, the "Mexicans" and the "Puerto Ricans" can use your help as well. I know they could use help in my old neighborhood.

    45. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by praksys · · Score: 1

      By 1807, Britain was forced to outlaw the practice...

      That's an odd way to put it. Britain was not forced outlaw the salve trade. Public opinion turned against the trade and the elected government of Britain outlawed the trade.

      Britain has yet to seriously discuss reparations for the damage done to Africa from the profits they made in the slave trade.

      No one will ever seriously discuss reparations to Africa for the slave trade because it is impossible to have that discussion without laughing. Almost all of the slaves taken from Africa were bought from other Africans. When African states ask for reparations for slavery they are, in effect, asking to be paid twice for all the slaves they sold.

      The real punch line to that joke is that the descendants of former slaves, now living and paying taxes in Britain, are being asked to pay reparations to the descendants of the people who sold their ancestors into slavery. If you want a serious discussion we should talk about how much money Africa owes to the descendants of slaves in the rest of the world.

    46. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, I believe that Britain spent more money enforcing the ban on slavery, than it made on the slave trade. We've done enough.

      http://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/history/battles/royal-navy-and-the-slave-trade/

    47. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by evil_aar0n · · Score: 1

      I agree with this, but do not, for a second, forget the similar harm done to Native Americans, and probably for longer. Blacks _have_ suffered most horridly up until relatively recent modern times. However, it wasn't that long ago - also during the '60s - that Indian homes were callously razed to make way for US government projects, among other things. I think they both have a claims that require redress.

      --
      Truth, Justice. Or the American Way.
    48. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      You're an idiot and I think you're just trying to start some sort of ridiculous argument because everything you've just said is totally beside the point.

    49. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      You expect me to be appalled and guilty at the fact that you go into harm's way... with your kids?

      Are you fucking stupid? If you actually bring your kids into a place where they can get shot, you must be.

      I'm not sad about what you have to go through, I'm mad... at *you*.

      I don't care where your mother lives, if a place is dangerous, you damn well don't go there. If you want to see your mother, offer to help move her and the rest of the family the hell out of that shithole that they live in. I don't care if you hold fond fucking memories of the place it maybe used to be. It's now a shithole and unless you and a battalion of your best friends start walking patrols with automatic weaponry, its going to stay that way.

      Just so we are clear, its not a shithole because black people or hispanics live there. Its a shithole because it is fucking Kosovo. Comprende? Would you let your mother live in freaking Mogadishu? Would you visit Afghanistan for the holidays for egg nog and reminiscing? I know some Afghans, they're poor, but no one accused them of being that stupid.

      If she doesn't want to move, or can't, then don't take your damn kids. If you want to be Rambo and go visit, at least you're a man and you can take your chances.

      I'd like you to please tell me how you think you and yours have worked on "fixing" diddly-shit while you personally allow a situation like that to exist. Or did you think that the problems that you are facing didn't mean that you wouldn't have to make sacrifices that really hurt.

      Are you too poor to help move your family out? Well, you're apparently not too damn poor to have five damn kids. Do you think the Lord God Almighty wants you to have as many kids as possible? Maybe He does, but he also wants you to take care of your parents too. I think that's in the Bible and the Koran too. Most of the atheists I know are also aware of it too.

      Is that offensive? Too bad. You think I can't tell you what to do to help fix the problem? Well, I damn well can make a good start, because I know that what you need to do has nothing to do with fairness or equality. You just aren't listening. It has nothing to do with getting your slice of the American Dream served up for you or your kids at birth. You've been fucked over. You're probably going to continue to get fucked over for the foreseeable future. It fucking sucks. I know it, you know it, everyone on God's Green Earth knows it. Get over it.

      Was that insensitive? Did that offend you? Too bad. If you start with the premise that no one gives a shit who called what person what in your family a name or spat on them, you're making a good start. The nice thing is that there really are people who feel bad about it, including me (believe it or not), but no one can get you out of this but you and yours. You can ask me to help ride shotgun for you, but its your wagon, Hoss.

      And now, just to make sure I fit your stereotype properly:

      I'm not a racist, BUT I think you if you have time to get offended about a joke post on Slashdot, you've clearly got a lot more time to deal with the other shit in your life.

    50. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      There's no punishment here. As I stated before, a child that manages to obtain an 80th percentile score when he went to a school that didn't even have a book for him to study has proven far more work ethic, persistence, and dedication to academia than his counterpart with the same score that wen to a school for which the only cause of poor performance is his own lack and shortcomings.

      There you go again, making assumptions that the kid from the better school should have to do better in order to prove himself. You just can't bring yourself to admit that you are giving an artificial advantage to one person at the expense of another, can you? Frankly I'm not even sure that it's Constitutional, given the equal protection requirements of the 14th amendment.

      Grades alone have never been the sole determining factor of a student's admittance . A student with a 3.8 but a long list of extracurricular activities, community service, and sports is often chosen over the 4.0 student with nothing else to show. Why is it so absurd to recognize the diverse achievements of low income students as well?

      It's absurd because you are giving an artificial advantage to someone based on criteria that nobody has any control over. The student who took part in all of those extracurricular activities earned extra consideration. The student who didn't take part in those activities made a choice not to do so.

      Education is already centralized to some extent.

      And therein lies the problem, as far as I'm concerned.

      And yes, it is absolutely intentional. The high income neighborhoods with a more direct access to the law makers push very hard to maintain the status quo. And these laws have the same end effect on that population's participation in education as jim crow did on their participation in government.

      I'm sorry but I can't take you seriously if you are going to play the 'Jim Crow' card. Lower income neighborhoods have the same representation that higher income neighborhoods do. In many cases I've seen representatives from inner city neighbors that are more responsive to their constituents than those from the suburbs. Your main complaint would seem to be that the higher income neighborhoods fight for the "status quo" against your alternative of increased wealth redistribution and a more centralized education system.

      Has it occurred to you that we already throw ridiculous amounts of money at our educational system and yet we never seem to manage to improve it? We spend more per student than almost every other nation in the World, yet in test scores we rank behind nations that spend considerably less than we do. What does that tell you?

      From what I've seen in my time in the human services field, bureaucracy and special interests do at least as much damage (if not more so) to the educational prospects of disadvantaged youth as any lack of funding. Families get lost trying to navigate a system that was ostensibly created to help them but in the end winds up serving it's own agenda. Schools aren't allowed to punish unruly students that disrupt the classroom, preventing those who want to learn from actually being able to do so. Teachers unions are so entrenched that they refuse to consider any meaningful reform of the educational system that calls for increased accountability. Special needs students wind up with more resources devoted to them than gifted ones. Schools wind up teaching to standardized tests instead of subject matter.

      None of these problems have anything to do with money. They have everything to do with a bloated bureaucracy that will only be made worse by more centralized control.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    51. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by toiletsalmon · · Score: 1

      Wow. You might not be a racist, but you certainly are an asshole. Thanks for your...uh..."input". I'm not sure what all THAT was about, but thanks.

      5 kids? LOL @ you.

    52. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by toiletsalmon · · Score: 1

      I think you're an idiot so I guess we're even then.

      Too bad more things can't work themselves out like that, huh?

    53. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I think my rebuttal was quite sufficient to put down someone who writes tripe like "I haven't heard of hardly anyone".

      It'd be a much better rebuttal to point out that the cost of a student at a university is not solely determined by the seat they sit in. ;)

      Well I was going to point out that taking your "logic" to its extreme you'd have somewhat large class sizes, but I thought the maths was a little difficult. For you.

      Fact is, the university has an upper limit on capacity, so at the margin letting person X in means rejecting person Y. This is why, as a cold hard fact, there's no such thing as positive discrimination.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  14. Silly by ledow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First, who cares who gave who what? Seriously? I mean, if you made a *major* boo-boo and gave Obama some racist memoribilia or something, then you're an idiot, but otherwise who cares? You're talking negotiations over the future of countries, anyone who reads anything into the gifts is clearly desperate for news or clearly focusing on the wrong things.

    Have the governments of the two countries seriously got nothing else better to waste their money on than gifts for other nations? Sure, bring something along but keep it simple. A couple of bouquets for the missus and a bottle of special wine or something to enjoy over dinner one night. Anything else is asking for a cock-up because it'll have been made from the ship that X's father fought against in war Y or something. And, trust me, nobody British really cared what gift was received/given the last time the US president and the UK prime minister met. Nobody. The press obviously had nothing else better to report, or were feeling snubbed themselves. They don't even care that Churchill's bust was moved in the Whitehouse... really... we don't have American presidents lining 10 Downing Street, so why should the American's have anything similar? So long as it was done respectfully (i.e. they didn't kick it down the stairs after drawing a moustache on it), who cares?

    Personally, I think the Queen's gift is the worst out of all those listed (in all the linked articles) anyway - it's too imperialist and overbearing... a signed photo... "Look, I have given you something cheap and readily available to remind you that you were once in my presence". Urk.

    1. Re:Silly by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Interesting

      First, who cares who gave who what? Seriously? I mean, if you made a *major* boo-boo and gave Obama some racist memoribilia or something, then you're an idiot, but otherwise who cares?

      Who knows? Obama might appreciate the irony of the former gear of would-be conquerors who would have exterminated his genetics reduced to mere trinketry.

      Have the governments of the two countries seriously got nothing else better to waste their money on than gifts for other nations?

      No. The government governs best which governs least. Anyway, what the fuck do you think this so-called bailout money is other than gifts for rich fuckers?

      Personally, I think the Queen's gift is the worst out of all those listed (in all the linked articles) anyway - it's too imperialist and overbearing... a signed photo... "Look, I have given you something cheap and readily available to remind you that you were once in my presence". Urk.

      If she ever stops doing all that, she has to admit that she's just one person. Kind of like if we admit that GM is just making a bunch of big shitpiles and can't cover its costs, we have to admit that some of the basic assumptions upon which our economy is based are totally boned.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Silly by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Queen's gift is a diplomatic one ... she gives the same gift of the same cost, to everyone, regardless of how important they are and regardless of what they give her in return, no one is snubbed, overvalued, undervalued, or insulted ....

      The giving of gifts is done for purely diplomatic reasons and the cost of the gift given by the British PM is limited, any gift given to him over that same cost is owned by the government not by the current PM ....

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    3. Re:Silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, I think that article(ie the writer) thinks its silly also. That's why it ended with the remark about the queen's gift to the president. It was a subtle joke to put that bit of info right at the end.

      *woosh*?

    4. Re:Silly by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would agree with you except every day for the last 8 years we heard about Bushisms. Just because Obama is your guy (not you personally, just in general) shouldn't mean that you quit pointing out the idiotic things that he does.

      Obama has already had plenty of Obamaisms (basically anytime he isn't in front of a teleprompter), yet I don't see people like Olberman leading off their show with them they way he did with Bush.

      All I want is consistency from people.

    5. Re:Silly by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      Personally, I think the Queen's gift is the worst out of all those listed (in all the linked articles) anyway - it's too imperialist and overbearing... a signed photo... "Look, I have given you something cheap and readily available to remind you that you were once in my presence". Urk.

      Yeah, if I gave my aunt an iPod for x-mas and she gave me a photo signed by herself in return I'd be pissed!

      Clearly the same rules apply even between heads of state. The Queen should have at least got him a Toblerone, I mean what the fuck?!

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    6. Re:Silly by iainl · · Score: 1

      First, who cares who gave who what? Seriously?

      Not 90% of the British Press, for a start. This "torrent of criticism" appears to be limited to a couple of minor opinion pieces in one paper. Certainly, I only found out about it when random Americans started asking me what I thought, because their press had led them to believe it was some kind of national emergency here.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    7. Re:Silly by ledow · · Score: 1

      I'm similarly British and, to be honest, this "article" is the first I'd ever heard of it, which is why I made my original post.

    8. Re:Silly by kisak · · Score: 0

      Obama has already had plenty of Obamaisms (basically anytime he isn't in front of a teleprompter), yet I don't see people like Olberman leading off their show with them they way he did with Bush.

      Care to share one of these Obamaisms that we haven't been told about yet? I can think about Obama's comment that his bowling was "special olympics", even though I found the people complaining being a bit PC.

      --

      --- guns don't kill people, people with guns kill people ---

    9. Re:Silly by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      (basically anytime he isn't in front of a teleprompter)

      Fox much?

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    10. Re:Silly by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 2, Informative

      You've probably seen them all, but I don't see them as the lead off news stories anymore.

      Video of him tripping all over himself.

      Quite a few random quotes.

      More videos. Some already covered and includes some Biden classics.

      I think these things are funny and bound to happen when you have the media attention that any sitting President would have. I thought many of the Bush ones were funny too. What I disagree with is attacking Bush for every verbal trip up while gushing all over Obama when he does the EXACT same thing on a fairly regular basis.

    11. Re:Silly by SirWhoopass · · Score: 1

      they didn't kick it down the stairs after drawing a moustache on it

      Indeed. We only did that with the bust of George III.

      I found this story rather amusing. Perhaps I am just an uncouth colonial, but I didn't realize the protocol for not touching the monarch was basically the same as that for not touching the exotic dancers in a gentlemen's club.

    12. Re:Silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Goodness. If you think any of these compare to the moronic gaffs of the last president, you are indeed deluded.

    13. Re:Silly by ndege · · Score: 1

      All I want is consistency from people.

      let me know how that works out for you.

      --
      Sig Return: 204 No Content
    14. Re:Silly by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Quite a few random quotes.

      Can't see the videos at work, but I was really expecting more from that link. Seriously is that the "cream of the crop" of "Obamaisms"? A couple things that were politically unwise, using the wrong name for a town, making factual errors... the one about eating waffles mirrors a similar event with Bush which was one time I was actually proud of our last President's answer!

      Those are nothing like Bush-isms where he would invent new words, mangle the pronunciation of words, butcher common sayings beyond recognition, or abuse grammar and randomly re-arrange words such that what he says either makes no sense ("food on your family") or is the opposite of what he wanted to say (he never stops thinking of ways to harm the US). The closest thing I see in that list of Obamaisms is where he implies he sees fallen heroes in the audience, which is pretty funny, but Bush was spouting gut-busters all the time.

      Look, I'm all for fairness and not giving a free pass to any President, and all Presidents make gaffs. But this is not the EXACT same thing. He is more like Reagand, Bush Senior, or Clinton. The reason Obama's gaffs don't get as much coverage is because they are not on the same order of magnitude. Bush was more like Dan Quayle, and not since Quayle has there been someone in that high a position with so much unintentional humor coming out of their mouths.

      Maybe this will change. It's been only a couple months, of course. But still, if you really really honestly truly can't see any difference between Bush's speaking ability, and, well, basically everyone else who's ever held the office then something is really honestly truly broken in your brain. That link is very disappointing (and I really was hoping for more; I'll have to check out the videos later I suppose) as a way of equating the two.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    15. Re:Silly by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      I mean, if you made a *major* boo-boo and gave Obama some racist memoribilia...

      You mean a picture of Prince Philip?

    16. Re:Silly by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      I agree that the obamaisms on the about.com link aren't of the same magnitude as the bushisms and I only got a chuckle out of a handful.
      But, Bush had 8 years to build up a repertoire. So I wouldn't count Obama out yet.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    17. Re:Silly by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The government governs best which governs least.

      How's the weather over there in Ethiopia?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    18. Re:Silly by Mordac · · Score: 1

      I would agree with you except every day for the last 8 years we heard about Bushisms. Just because Obama is your guy (not you personally, just in general) shouldn't mean that you quit pointing out the idiotic things that he does.

      Obama has already had plenty of Obamaisms (basically anytime he isn't in front of a teleprompter), yet I don't see people like Olberman leading off their show with them they way he did with Bush.

      All I want is consistency from people.

      This is fun, since you just came from Red State I presume, I'll speak in slow words so you can understand.

      Bushisms are like the President Grooping a Prime Minister, or congratulating the Queen on her 200th birthday.

      Obama mistake? Giving a thoughtful gift with sight for forethought. Or a gift that the kids will enjoy (toy helicopter.)

      Bush used a Teleprompter his whole term, when it was pulled away we got Bushisms. Obama uses a teleprompter just like Bush, but when its pulled away he speaks English and people enjoy and cheer.

      See, my point here, you have no point yourself. You live by a set of rules that are inconsistent at best. You project your own foibles on your enemy, while Democrats don't even consider Republicans their enemy.

      Please, step back from your computer before you hurt yourself... All you do is repeat what Red State tells you, you dont' have a single thought of your own up there (if you did, you wouldn't be even bring up teleprompters or a personal gift with meaning.) The rest of the world doesn't care about those... They do care if The President gives a Prime Minister a back-rub (a little care.) They do care when the president breaks the Geneva Convention (a lot.) But in the Republican world, torture isn't as important as an iPod.

    19. Re:Silly by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      I only pulled sites that seemed reputable and had some sourcing going on. I didn't want to seem bias in any way.

      Those are nothing like Bush-isms where he would invent new words, mangle the pronunciation of words, butcher common sayings beyond recognition, or abuse grammar and randomly re-arrange words such that what he says either makes no sense ("food on your family") or is the opposite of what he wanted to say (he never stops thinking of ways to harm the US).

      In one of the video town hall meetings Obama does something very similar.

      And yes, Obama has a great speaking ability. He can deliver a speech like no one else in recent history, but that's a lot different than speaking off the cuff. Will he ever amass the large library of Bushims that Bush had? Time will tell.

    20. Re:Silly by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      You're so blinded by hate for Bush that you immediately resort to personal attacks against me and then ignore any imperfection in Obama.

      Please, step back from your computer before you hurt yourself... All you do is repeat what Red State tells you, you dont' have a single thought of your own up there (if you did, you wouldn't be even bring up teleprompters or a personal gift with meaning.)

      You're the one that seems blinded by Obamas rock stardom. I think for myself quite well actually. I'm not swayed by someone who can just deliver a good speech. I didn't even bring up the gift, but I'll comment on the iPod.

      I don't event think it's a bad thing that he gave the Queen an iPod. It represents the current US for what we are. A consumption minded debtor nation spending our kids (and their kids) money for gadgets and toys today that we should really just do without until we clean up our financial mess. Nope, the iPod was the perfect gift.

    21. Re:Silly by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I went to have a look, and, unfortunately, only a few were really funny in a way Bushisms were.

      See, the latter were funny not just because they were factual or PC blunders, but on the word play level. Obama seems to be a bit more of a smooth talker, so we see less of that from him.

      But, anyway, keep 'em (the books) coming nonetheless. On one hand, I wish we had another guy of Bush's caliber there sometime in the future, when his collection of jokes gets old; on the other, only so long as we don't have to endure everything else that came with that...

    22. Re:Silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just noticed one of my vids didn't cut and paste right.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDJSVPAx8xc

      This one is pretty funny :)

    23. Re:Silly by euxneks · · Score: 1

      So, compare that with Bushisms: http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/blbushisms.htm

      Where Bush seems consistently confused, and wilfully ignorant of foreign policy, Obama seems more like he's "slipping up" occasionally.

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    24. Re:Silly by kisak · · Score: 1

      I am sorry, if that is the best you could find you are making a fool of yourself. None of those quotes makes a fool of Obama like the Bushism who showed what a shallow guy that spoiled brat was.

      --

      --- guns don't kill people, people with guns kill people ---

    25. Re:Silly by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      "President Grooping"

      I would like to meet this president.

      "All you do is repeat what Red State tells you"

      I would also like to meet Mr. Red State.

      "Please, step back from your computer before you hurt yourself"

      Please do.

      And before you freak out, read my sig. I have little to no faith in any politician. But you sound as absurd as the guy that you're claiming to be projecting his own foibles. And for the record I have no party affiliation, and I do vote.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  15. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If he had really wanted to put two seconds' thought into it, he would have gotten something for her dogs ... either the corgis or the labs. She's absolutely nuts over her corgis (same as every dog lover :-)

  16. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The real owners are the big wealthy business interests that control things and make all the important decisions. Forget the politicians, theyre an irrelevancy. The politicians are put there to give you the idea that you have freedom of choice. You dont. You have no choice. You have owners. They own you.. They own everything. They own all the important land. They own and control the corporations. Theyve long since bought and paid for the Senate, the Congress, the statehouses, the city halls. Theyve got the judges in their back pockets. And they own all the big media companies, so that they control just about all of the news and information you hear. Theyve got you by the balls. They spend billions of dollars every year lobbying lobbying to get what they want. Well, we know what they want; they want more for themselves and less for everybody else.

    But Ill tell you what they dont want. They dont want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They dont want well-informed, well-educated people capable of critical thinking. Theyre not interested in that. That doesnt help them. Thats against their interests. They dont want people who are smart enough to sit around the kitchen table and figure out how badly theyre getting fucked by a system that threw them overboard 30 fucking years ago.

    You know what they want? Obedient workers people who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork but just dumb enough to passively accept all these increasingly shittier jobs with the lower pay, the longer hours, reduced benefits, the end of overtime and the vanishing pension that disappears the minute you go to collect it. And, now, theyre coming for your Social Security. They want your fucking retirement money. They want it back, so they can give it to their criminal friends on Wall Street. And you know something? Theyll get it. Theyll get it all, sooner or later, because they own this fucking place. Its a big club, and you aint in it. You and I are not in the big club.

    -George Carlin

  17. RIAA? by LatencyKills · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hmmm. Is there a copyright issue here (assuming that all the music on the ipod was not open source)? Can I legally hook an ipod to my computer, load it with music from my iTunes, and give the ipod away? How is that any different from making copies of CDs that I own and giving those copies away?

    --
    Jealously hoarding mod points since 2007.
    1. Re:RIAA? by Aerynvala · · Score: 1

      I'd actually like to know the answer to that as well. I'm sure RIAA would say it was illegal, but that's to be expected. I know that when you sync an iPod to a new computer it will try to wipe whatever was on it, but that can be worked around. And if the mp3 files are themselves not drm'd?

      --
      http://transformativeworks.org/
    2. Re:RIAA? by v1 · · Score: 1

      I don't think anyone said it had any copyrighted music on it? maybe it was all free stuff.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    3. Re:RIAA? by tdvaughan · · Score: 1

      Hilariously, it's still illegal in the UK to copy a CD that you have legitimately bought on to iTunes.

    4. Re:RIAA? by Pebble · · Score: 1

      Well, when the president does it that means that it is not illegal.

    5. Re:RIAA? by master811 · · Score: 1

      the music on the ipod was not open source)?

      FYI, open source != Free

    6. Re:RIAA? by PMuse · · Score: 1

      Can I legally hook an ipod to my computer, load it with music from my iTunes, and give the ipod away?

      One presumes that the White House created and paid for a separate account for the gift tunes.

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    7. Re:RIAA? by furby076 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Do you have proof he did something questionable? I can buy an iPod, and buy music from Applie iTunes (or some other legal source) and then give it to someone as a gift. it's done all the time. So if you don't have proof that he pirated music we need to get you modded down.

      --

      I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
    8. Re:RIAA? by furby076 · · Score: 1

      CD that you have legitimately bought on to iTunes.

      iTunes sells CD's? If they do then I've been ripped off cause I never got a CD.

      --

      I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
    9. Re:RIAA? by rpillala · · Score: 1

      If you hook an ipod to your computer, can you buy new copies of songs you already have? If you can, you could load them onto the ipod only, maybe? I don't have an ipod or itunes but it makes sense in theory at least. That would be one way around this issue, not that I have any information about what was actually done here.

      --
      When the axe came to the forest, the trees said, "Look out - the handle was once one of us."
    10. Re:RIAA? by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      No, iTunes rips CDs, and it's been doing a pretty good job of it since long before the iTunes Store existed (the iTunes Store was added in version 4.0).

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    11. Re:RIAA? by LatencyKills · · Score: 1

      Is that right? I honestly don't know. If I buy music through iTunes and put it on my ipod, can I turn around, buy another ipod, put that music on that ipod, and give it away? Or are you saying that he bought music, put it on that ipod, gave the ipod to the Queen, and then deleted it from his system? Because I think that's the only way that what he did could be legal (provided we're talking about not free music here). I believe that you buy a license for a song for your exclusive use - I cannot make copies in any medium (ipod, burn a CD, whatever) and give it away. Or does that fall under some kind of fair use, like mix tapes used to? Is he limited to some number of copies that he can give away? If he and Michelle both have that music on their ipods, can he still give it to the Queen, or is even that the same question because they're married? At this point the law seems to me, a complete layman, to be so convoluted that I no longer know when I'm breaking the law. Does someone who has a greater grasp of these billion shades of gray care to enlighten me?

      --
      Jealously hoarding mod points since 2007.
    12. Re:RIAA? by furby076 · · Score: 1

      I don't know what he did, though I am sure it was one of his aids who did the actual work. Since it's such a low cost item, and probably coming out of the WH budget, plus they don't want to get caught in a silly/stupid scandel I would put myself on the side of they did it the right way - including creating an iTunes account for the queen. Now again, you could be correct they did it wrong, but without proof you want to be careful as to what you say.

      CDs fall under different rules then mix "tapes" since it is digital vs analog (why you can VCR record a tv show for years). Now can someone buy a CD and make a single copy for their friends? I am not sure - RIAA would say no but who cares what they say. If the RIAA felt he did somethign wrong I am willing to bet they would attempt to leverage this in their favor.

      Again - neither you nor I know for sure so I would err on the side of caution and say his aids did it the right way.

      --

      I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
  18. Wow by ilovegeorgebush · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Christ Slashdot, this is not news.

    1. Re:Wow by LingNoi · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      In the past 4 months there has been way too much American politics on this website. I know slashdot is based in America but not all its readers are and it's getting such poor quality.

      No one gives a shit that Obama sucks at gift giving, not even in England however many newspapers try to hype it up. Fucking stupid.

    2. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it is.

      It shows that the DVDs to Brown weren't a fluke; we're willing to give foreign dignitaries gifts worthy of Idiocracy.

    3. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you like a gift to make up for it?

    4. Re:Wow by TimHunter · · Score: 1

      Yes it is news. Especially for nerds. The President of the United States gave a gift to the Queen of England. Not a ceremonial sword, or a desk made from timbers from a famous old ship, a signed book, or any sort of gift that heads of states have traditionally exchanged. He gave her memorabilia stored in electronic form on a technological product designed and sold by a United States company famous for its computers, wireless telephones, and portable music players. Not to mention yet another demonstration of the new administration's preference for Apple products over Microsoft products. That's newsworthy and as nerdy as it gets.

    5. Re:Wow by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 4, Informative

      Dude, DEAL. This site is American which will obviously bias coverage. I often visit British news and entertainment sites and I don't cry about all the stories covering entertainers and personalities I've never heard of. I simply skip them.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    6. Re:Wow by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 5, Funny

      Achievement Unlocked: "Posting Anti-America-Centric comment and mentioning that there are global readers that don't give a fuck!"

      --
      This space for rent, inquire within.
    7. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He gave her memorabilia stored in electronic form on a technological product designed and sold by a United States company famous for its computers, wireless telephones, and portable music players.

      You forgot to mention "Made in China" like the computers, wireless telephones and everything else.
      "Here's a gift from Chinamerica!"

    8. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, DEAL. This site is American which will obviously bias coverage.

      DUDE, read the post where he already said that, oh right Americans don't read.

    9. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see you're new here. Welcome to Slashdot!

    10. Re:Wow by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Besides that, Obama's policies on the internet will likely affect the rest of the world. From ICANN to Amazon.com, the US has the most influence in cyberspace. To put it quite simply, if the US had adopted IPv6 swiftly and completely, the rest of the world would've followed immediately, and IPv4 would've been history within a year.

      So what Obama says and doesn't say, does and doesn't do regarding the internet is of notable importance to the rest of the developed world. And by extension, his stances on technology give indication of where he might lean with regards to matters such as net neutrality.

      The same is with regards to copyrights and even patents. The rest of the world, through international treaties and such, will follow what major players like the US or the UK does. Just look at copyright; the US and the UK have been bouncing copyright extension acts off each other.

      Don't knock the US political stories. Besides, there's plenty of stories on the front page about the politics of other nations. I see one about Australia right this minute.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    11. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Achievement Unlocked: "Posting Anti-America-Centric comment and mentioning that there are global readers that don't give a fuck!"

      I heard the sound effect when I read this. I play too much WoW.

    12. Re:Wow by Kuukai · · Score: 1

      Not to mention yet another demonstration of the new administration's preference for Apple products over Microsoft products.

      Huh? The man uses a Zune and a Blackberry rather than an iPhone...

      --
      Sendou Wave Kick!!
  19. Which iPod? by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The article doesn't specify which iPod they gave her (article links to a 5th Gen). Since it had video, it wasn't a shuffle. Clearly the best one would be the 32 GB iPod touch as far as video goes, but if it was "loaded with video" then maybe the 120 GB iPod Classic is more likely?

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    1. Re:Which iPod? by DavidTC · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Obmama didn't 'give her an iPod' at all.

      Obama gave her a signed Rogers (Of Rogers and Hammerstein, who the queen loves,and considers the a song from Oklahoma her and her husbands 'song') songbook.

      It was an absurdly good gift. Personal, and yet historic enough that it can be displayed with a bunch of other historic things.

      He also gave her a bunch of footage of her trip here that was filmed. He presented this to her within a video iPod.

      And everyone trying to make an issue of this is a giant moron.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    2. Re:Which iPod? by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      It was an absurdly good gift. Personal, and yet historic enough that it can be displayed with a bunch of other historic things.

      That's cool, personally though I'd prefer a 32 GB iPod Touch :-)

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
  20. american movies by simonbas · · Score: 3, Funny

    "igniting a torrent of criticism in the British press"

    Where can I find that .torrent?

    1. Re:american movies by niktemadur · · Score: 1

      "igniting a torrent of criticism in the British press"

      Where can I find that .torrent?

      The press of the Principality of Sealand?

      --
      Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
    2. Re:american movies by initialE · · Score: 1
      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
  21. Royal Navy versus the Slave Traders by xzvf · · Score: 1
  22. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah, I really do think Corgi owners are a fun lot, and Corgis are some of the nicest dogs around. As the poster said above , The Queen of England is not exactly a simpleton, a slouch or unintelligent. I find someone so entitled has gotten down on all fours like the rest of us and she has done a lot more for her country, I believe, than Obama ever will.

    See her first telivised christmas address in 1957.

  23. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ERROR: ")" expected. Found EOF

  24. Sync off only one PC? by Shadow_139 · · Score: 3, Funny

    So will she have to fly to the US and sync with Obamas PC to load new song onto them since apples DRM only allow the device to sync with one system without loosing data?

    1. Re:Sync off only one PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      clever bastard he guaranteed a second meeting :o

  25. Hilarious. by Sj0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just find it hilarious, it seems like the criticisms of the US personified.

    "Here's a rare and incredibly symbolic gift, a pen case made with wood from anti-slave ships."-British

    "lol heres 2 fast 2 furious" - US

    --
    It's been a long time.
    1. Re:Hilarious. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up.

      This is the essence of a story.

      No one cares what model of an iPod it was or why those DVD's won't play at mr. Brown's dvd player.

    2. Re:Hilarious. by icebrain · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think it's indicative of Obama's naivete and complete lack of experience with regard to foreign policy. IIRC, he also blew off an official state dinner with Brown saying he was "too busy", and dismissed the US-UK relationship as "nothing special", and sent back the bust of Churchill that had been at the White House for quite a long time. Oh, and the DVDs came with a couple of Marine One helicopter toys, too.

      --
      The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
    3. Re:Hilarious. by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 1

      Why didn't he give her a GM (Government Motors) 'green car.'

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    4. Re:Hilarious. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't say anything negative about our black president. The nation's delicate sensibilities can't handle it.

      Obama fucking something up? No, no, that couldn't be. It's just the Brits being whiny. Our president is perfect, haven't you read/heard/seen?

    5. Re:Hilarious. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, you have it all wrong. The Obamas were merely filming a homemade movie which they will present to Gordon Brown later - "The Beverly Hillbillies go to England."

    6. Re:Hilarious. by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1
      In any case, these "gifts" are not really reaching the apparent receiver directly. If Brown gets a gift from a visiting dignitary he does not actually own it - if he wants to personally use it, he needs to pay full price to the treasury in order to take it home.

      While the president or prime minister are officially bearing the gift - I would imagine that neither one does the gift choosing himself. So if the president's gift was considered lame, then he has a problem with his organization, rather than his personal taste. I suspect though that the real problem the British have is one of substance not of form: the relationship of Britain and the US is not so important for the US, anymore. That attracts attention in Britain from two sides: those who are mourning the "special relationship" and those who don't want to be so attached to US policy anyway.

    7. Re:Hilarious. by Sj0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Don't say anything negative about our black president. The nation's delicate sensibilities can't handle it."

      You must be seeing different media than I am.

      I'm constantly seeing criticism of Obama and his administration and his policies.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    8. Re:Hilarious. by Lifyre · · Score: 1

      I think Obama's inability to give decent gifts is pretty indicative of general inexperience to me. This isn't necessarily a bad thing considering why he was elected (as a force of change) but it will certainly result in a few bumps in the road like this. He has been thrust into a very high stress environment especially with the economy, war, and the era of the Hollywood president.

      He doesn't have the leisure time to think about all of the nuances of foreign relations and doesn't have the general experience to know all of it either. I was unaware of the gifting traditions but I've never been in his position. I think this is more a failure of his aids and the failure of hiring competent aids for assisting in foreign relations.

      --
      I'll meet you at the intersection of "Should be" and "Reality"
    9. Re:Hilarious. by mdwh2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      dismissed the US-UK relationship as "nothing special"

      Given that "special" was used as double-speak meaning things like one-sided extradition treaties, and us following the US into a dubious war, I'm fine with that...

    10. Re:Hilarious. by u38cg · · Score: 1

      There's quite an illuminating comment on one of the Economist blogs re this issue. Apparently Obama's team were caught on the hop over the gift thing - not suprising when you think that the entire team around him is still green. It's quite possible that no-one even realised a gift was required until it was to late to do anything but scrabble around the shelves of the nearest store.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    11. Re:Hilarious. by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      I think Obama's inability to give decent gifts is pretty indicative of general inexperience to me. This isn't necessarily a bad thing considering why he was elected (as a force of change) but it will certainly result in a few bumps in the road like this.

      Isn't there a standing diplomatic corps with experience in these matters? I don't know how it's done in America but in the UK, governments come and governments go, and the identity of the Foreign Minister changes with the wind, but there's always a number of grey gentlemen in the Foreign Office who've been there many a long year and would have a quiet word in the Minister's ear if they thought he was about to do anything foolish.

      Is there no Sir Humphrey Appleby in the White House to advise on such things? I gather there's less tradition there of an apolitical civil service, but surely they can't replace the entire organisation with their own people? It would be chaos.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    12. Re:Hilarious. by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      He doesn't have the leisure time to think about all of the nuances of foreign relations and doesn't have the general experience to know all of it either

      If only there was a department of some sort that specialized in diplomatic protocol and niceties.......

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    13. Re:Hilarious. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You do not recall correctly, actually. He did not blow off the dinner due to being too busy, and he referred to the US-UK relationship as a "special relationship" instead of the traditional "special partnership". And, of course, the British media perceived this as a massive realignment of foreign policy.

      Come on. Do they have NOTHING better to talk about?

    14. Re:Hilarious. by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Given that "special" was used as double-speak meaning things like one-sided extradition treaties, and us following the US into a dubious war

      Oh, quit your whining, we followed you into a dubious war a long time ago that could have been avoided if Chamberlain had some backbone. The United States as a non-interventionist country quite content to worry about things on our side of the pond until you had to go and bankrupt the Empire and upset the geopolitical world order. Can't you see how this is all your fault?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    15. Re:Hilarious. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "He doesn't have the leisure time to think about all of the nuances of foreign relations..."

      Then just what the hell is that army of 500 staffers that accompanied him on this trip for? Also, is anyone slightly disturbed by the fact that apparently no one in the new State Dept can correctly translate English to Russian?

      On the matter of outrageous bonuses for failed AIG leadership, why aren't we hearing about Franklin Rains cleaning up at Fannie Mae while he was simultaneously setting off a global recession?

      I think the more probable answer is that The Obumbler is really just a pretty suit who gets carted out to read a message from a teleprompter whenever The Man Behind The Curtain feels compelled to address the people. I can't help getting the feeling that everything we're seeing is just an illusion, that we were sold up the river long ago, and that glitches are finally starting to appear in the Matrix, metaphorically-speaking.

    16. Re:Hilarious. by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Oh, quit your whining, we followed you into a dubious war a long time ago that could have been avoided if Chamberlain had some backbone.

      Does that mean should have waited until around 2005 or so before we joined in with Iraq?

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    17. Re:Hilarious. by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      "Try turning off Fox News."

      I was watching that supposed bastion of liberal strongholdedness, The Daily Show, and half the show was dedicated to bashing the Obama administration's handling of the various problems the country is facing.

      Besides that, the Peter Schiffs and Ron Pauls of the world have been consistently criticising the methods used to get the economy back on track, ever since the exact same policies were tried under the mantle of Bush.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    18. Re:Hilarious. by mrjohnson · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Obama's got enough on his plate. He didn't go shopping for a gift to give Brown, nor did he pace the card isle at the grocery store. It was an aide that screwed up.

      They've been in office like 60 days now, hiccups like that shouldn't really happen, but then with everything else going on -- who cares?

      More importantly, he's been apparently working behind the scenes with Russia on an arms deal pretty much since the day he took office. They're willing to sign a 2/3 reduction. And we're worried about gift giving.

    19. Re:Hilarious. by Uberbah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On the matter of outrageous bonuses for failed AIG leadership, why aren't we hearing about Franklin Rains cleaning up at Fannie Mae while he was simultaneously setting off a global recession?

      Because that's a bile of BS Republican misdirection. Nevermind the 1:60 ratio between assets and liabilities that investment firms were taking on, nevermind the complete lack of oversight from the SEC, it's all the fault of FM/FM and the CRA.

    20. Re:Hilarious. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er yeah. Except Japan attacked you then Germany declared war on the US, not the other way around. The US was dragged kicking and screaming into WWII, it didn't go in voluntarily and was quite happy to see its allies bombed into oblivion.

    21. Re:Hilarious. by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 1

      Yes, and what great synbolism - "All we see in you is a black guy. But we cool, right G? RESPECT! *terrorist fist-jab*"

      --
      I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
    22. Re:Hilarious. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the fuck is that modded funny? It's the (sad) truth.

      There is no meaning in Obama's gift. There is very little monetary value in it, but that's not what you should be giving to a leader of a country.

      His gift is basically saying "Who are you? Oh right, head of the UK. Well, let me have my media cartel put some trash on this cheap toy our corporate overlords have had assembled in China."

      The photos are actually a good idea, but stuffing them with cheap trash is very sad. It wouldn't have surprised me if the "songs and accessories" had contained advertisements for more junk.

      A nice hand-crafted picture frame by some traditional manufactury is way better suited for a queen than a tech gadget that probably breaks in 2 years.

    23. Re:Hilarious. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Franklin Raines, former head of Fannie Mae: "These assets are so riskless that their capital for holding them should be under 2%."

    24. Re:Hilarious. by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      I was going for sarcasm with my post but perhaps you weren't aware of the fact that the US was already fighting the Germans before Pearl Harbor?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    25. Re:Hilarious. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no! Not the FM/FM and the CRA! Should we get the ASS from the WWW and the USWH involved to assist?

  26. Obama not related to slave trade by xzvf · · Score: 1

    Despite his skin color I'd think his Kenyan background would indicate a present commemorating decolonization of Africa and creation of the Commonwealth as opposed to the elimination of the west African slave trade to North America. Unless of course the present was to the United States and not Obama specifically. Wonder how re-gifting works in this case?

    1. Re:Obama not related to slave trade by Another,+completely · · Score: 1

      Of course it was to the United States. It goes with the desk in the oval office (made from the timbers of the sister ship to the source of the timber in the desk that's already there). It should go to the national archives, but if it actually looks good on the desk (and people can deal with the symbolism of having a British gift on that desk) then I would imagine it could be used there too.

      This came up eight years ago, when the Clintons were accused of taking some gifts with them when they left (see here). For a sitting president to accept a large personal gift would really not work. I bet Gordon Brown can keep the DVDs.

    2. Re:Obama not related to slave trade by Amnenth · · Score: 1

      Given the presence of a gift from the French in New York Harbor, something from Britain should be no problem.

  27. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by tomhudson · · Score: 1

    (same as every dog lover :-)

    ERROR: ")" expected. Found EOF

    I have no mouth and I must scream! you ignorant clod :-

  28. The Queens Gift by howman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's fairly poignant the fact that she gives everyone the same gift, a silver framed picture of her... Pretty much says, 'you ain't shit better than anyone else, but I am da bomb.'

    --
    flinging poop since 1969
    1. Re:The Queens Gift by GregNorc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or it could be to avoid situations like those that arose when Brown visited the USA.

      If everyone gets the same gift, no one will feel slighted. The leader of a major superpower or a tiny island nation being treated the same? That's actually a pretty smart political move.

    2. Re:The Queens Gift by bentcd · · Score: 1

      It's fairly poignant the fact that she gives everyone the same gift, a silver framed picture of her... Pretty much says, 'you ain't shit better than anyone else, but I am da bomb.'

      What it says to me is that the British monarch did at some point stop trying to play Britain's friends up against each other by giving gifts according to how much regard the monarch held for each. Whether this is because the British monarch has become irrelevant (thus making such intrigue pointless) or because Britain would rather not be playing on its friends' rivalries anymore I do not know.

      --
      sigs are hazardous to your health
    3. Re:The Queens Gift by RebelWithoutAClue · · Score: 1

      She's just returning the favor.

      "The White House tells us that President Bush has given the Queen some gifts. Two silver platters and a porcelain bowl. Apparently the Queen gave Mr Bush a sterling silver ruler engraved with the names of past US presidents, a book about the Crown Jewels and a jewel box."

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3279581.stm

      So not everybody gets the standard gift.

      --
      "However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results" - Winston Churchill
    4. Re:The Queens Gift by skeeto · · Score: 1

      I like that idea. From now on all my friends and family get a signed photograph of me for their birthdays. They'll love it.

  29. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1

    Wait, what's the dog going to do with an iPod?

  30. Mix Tapes by i_ate_god · · Score: 4, Funny

    Remember back in the day when you used to give mix tapes to girls to show them how amazing you were?

    --
    I'm god, but it's a bit of a drag really...
    1. Re:Mix Tapes by biscuitlover · · Score: 1

      My favourite post on Slashdot for months. Wish I had mod points.

      I also wish that dignitaries did swap mix tapes. Wonder if they'd spend ages doing the artwork in biro and plastering stickers all over the TDK90. Queen's special mix 2009.

      Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh tapes. Tapes.

    2. Re:Mix Tapes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wish I had mod points.

      No one cares what you wish for. Get over yourself.

    3. Re:Mix Tapes by biscuitlover · · Score: 1

      Whereas we all care deeply about your pedantic whineing. So so sorry that I had the audacity to tell the parent I liked their post. Really. I'm so sorry.

  31. One Already Had One! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you really think her old one ran out of space, or maybe it didn't have enough encryption for the US record industry's liking and so had to be replaced, either way, it wasn't newsworthy the first time ma'am's portable DRM box was discussed and obama barely increases that newsworthiness

    June 2005 | CBBC Newsround | The Queen 'joins iPod revolution'

    http://www.macworld.co.uk/news/index.cfm?NewsID=11875

    1. Re:One Already Had One! by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      They didn't give her an iPod, they gave her footage of her visit that was on an iPod.

      Is everyone here a moron? The iPod was the frame.

      I can just imagine if they'd burned the footage to DVD: President gives queen DVD-R!

      He did give her an actual gift too: A signed songbook by Rogers, who wrote some of her favorite musicals.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  32. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The summary doesn't even mention that the DVDs that Obama gave Brown were encoded for the USA, and therefore wouldn't play on DVD players in Britain. Come on, Obumbler! You're eye-poppingly wealthy and you now have an army of people to pick out gifts on your behalf. Can you please send them somewhere besides Wal-Mart 30 minutes before you're supposed to meet a head of state? Sad amateur, indeed. What should we expect, though, from someone who's been taking instead of giving his whole life?

  33. !iPod by FTWinston · · Score: 3, Funny

    Everyone knows that the queen doesn't have an iPod, she has a wePod!

    1. Re:!iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A onePod, surely?

    2. Re:!iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the queen doesn't have an iPod, she has a wePod!

      Actually what she has is a WeAreNotAmusedPod

    3. Re:!iPod by AnfieldSierra · · Score: 1

      Everyone knows that the queen doesn't have an iPod, she has a onePod!

      There, fixed that for you.

  34. Title is wrong by Late+Adopter · · Score: 4, Informative

    President Obama was unable to meet with Queen Elizabeth, since she passed away a while ago. Instead he met with HM Queen Elizabeth II. I know it sounds pedantic, but they are different people.

    1. Re:Title is wrong by grimJester · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the first one was scrapped in 1975.

    2. Re:Title is wrong by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      President Obama was unable to meet with Queen Elizabeth, since she passed away a while ago. Instead he met with HM Queen Elizabeth II. I know it sounds pedantic, but they are different people.

      For reasons which you have already cited, it would be unlikely that anyone else would require clarification regarding which Queen Elizabeth was the subject of the article.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    3. Re:Title is wrong by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think from the context, we can figure out which one they mean. When you read a tabloid headline that says "Prince Charles Admits To Yet Another Fuck-up," do you actually have to wonder whether they're referring to Charles Stuart or Charles Windsor? Besides, saying "Elizabeth II" over and over again in headlines would appear even more stupid. "Elizabeth II to visit U.S." would elicit a collective response of "...as opposed to Elizabeth I, who has been dead for 400 years?" It would be a constant, and needless, distraction from the intended communication.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:Title is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fun fact: out of all the sixteen countries of which Queen Elizabeth II is queen, none has actually had a Queen Elizabeth I (The Kingdom of England ceased to exist in 1707).

    5. Re:Title is wrong by jrothwell97 · · Score: 1

      Why even call her 'Queen Elizabeth'? What other Queens are there at the G20?

      --
      Those using pirated Tinysoft signatures(TM) are a real threat to society and should all be thrown in jail.
  35. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by Inda · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think a nice gun would have been more fitting for Her Royal Highness.

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
  36. Zune by bFusion · · Score: 1

    This is probably publicity to cover up the fact that he used to use a Zune (which is, as we all know, WAY lamer than a totally hip iPod) :-/

  37. So he gave her madge an Ipod by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

    Perhaps they should re-christen it the OnePod. I mean it could have been worse he could have given her the Royal Wii :)

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  38. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ERROR: "." expected. Found EOF.

  39. What is it with the Obamas and... by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1

    ... shallow, consumerist gifts.

    Oh, never mind, I just re-read that and answered my own question.

    1. Re:What is it with the Obamas and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I know most people will brush off these gift stories simply as slow news day material, but....

      Your comment made me stop and think beyond "man this is boring news" beyond the fact Obama gave a gift that broke laws (e.g., the draconian DRM laws we are currently ENFORCING -- so Obama shouldn't have an exception, but that is beyond my point here).

      It was one thing for Obama to give the shallow gift of DVD's in return for a precious one-of-a-kind gift. It just merely demonstrated Obama's lack of experience that was touted during his campaign -- thereby proving it.

      However, now we have a second shallow gift given now:
      This not only says to me that Obama is inexperienced as a politician, but also says a lot about the guy's personality. It just proves he doesn't care. I'm really worried about America's future now.

      If he doesn't care enough to put thought into a simple gift, does he really care about the economy or is he just pushing his agenda regardless of the outcome? I know it's a far stretch from gifts to rule, but it's easier to see the truth in small matters.

    2. Re:What is it with the Obamas and... by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1

      Very insightful comments. If I hadn't already posted to this topic, I'd mod you up

  40. Like there's something better? by geekmux · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Are there really not enough issues in the world to get worked up about that people are arguing over a freakin' gift exchange?

    This just in...Israel and Palestine are fighting. More at the top of the hour...

    A lot of people are pissed about Government bailouts. News at 11.

    The economy sucks. More to come.

    Don't complain. At least this is "new" by comparison to the rest of the shit that keeps getting dredged up day after day.

    1. Re:Like there's something better? by LEMONedIScream · · Score: 1

      Israel and Palestine conflicts have been going for a long time (Timeline_of_the_Israeli-Palestinian_conflict) why would you feel that it's no longer newsworthy?

    2. Re:Like there's something better? by nyctopterus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Err, for precisely that reason? If it's not new, is it news?

    3. Re:Like there's something better? by LEMONedIScream · · Score: 0

      I suppose, but that timeline looked liked it contained quite a few events on it, and I'm sure there will be more to come and yet geekmux feels like he's ready to do away with it entirely.

      It just felt very dismissive, perhaps he shouldn't look for his entertainment in the news?

    4. Re:Like there's something better? by PachmanP · · Score: 1

      If you stop giving them attention when they misbehave they'll stop throwing temper tantrums!

      --
      You're thinking small. Why miniaturize the laser, when we could instead enlarge the sharks? -John Searle
    5. Re:Like there's something better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That page needs some heavy editing to include events from before 1882. Everyonne knows that the first rocket was fired 3ms before the big bang. The fact that space probably didn't exist makes it impossible to tell who fired it.

    6. Re:Like there's something better? by hardburn · · Score: 1

      No, they'll keep doing it until they die. They have it in their heads that people want more sensationalism and "experts" who talk forcefully but don't know anything. Any decline in viewership is countered by piling on more.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    7. Re:Like there's something better? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Because at this point, it's all "same shit, different day".

      We want to hear something different. Change.

      Status Quo is boring.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  41. The "Anti Slave Ship" is worth about a klan hood by Tiber · · Score: 1, Interesting

    God, the first chimp has a huge ego. I wonder if they grease the doors in the morning so he can fit his head through.

    Also the HMS GANNET was an anti-slave ship for the wrong reasons. The GANNET was employed to protect British interests and suppress the slave market among the Islamic and African kingdoms, guaranteeing British prices and control of the market.

    Obama, being an idiot, doesn't know a lick of history.

  42. God Save The Queen? by hitnrunrambler · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hope out of consideration for the rich history of British music that it included some of the classics...

    like the Sex Pistols http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_Save_the_Queen_(Sex_Pistols_song)

  43. Maybe Japan's Prime Minister will get 20" rims!!! by cornercuttin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    first, he gives the British PM a stack of DVDs (ultra lame). next, he gives the queen of england a friggin ipod (i'm sure she is really suave on computers...probably has a 24" iMac all modded out).

    maybe next Obama will show up in Japan with some 20" rims for the PM there. "Runnin on dubs!!!"

    this is so embarrassing. i would've expected it out of President Bush. i bet he got the queen a handgun (big ol' desert eagle), and he probably got Tony Blair a shot-glass set. but Obama? why is he pulling this crap?

  44. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by IBBoard · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You mean the parent post prevents fire? Wow!

  45. She should have gave him Northern Ireland . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Ah, Mr. Obama, I've been expecting you."

    "You seem to be handling all the troubles in the world, right now. One more shouldn't be a problem for you, please accept my gift to you of Northern Ireland."

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:She should have gave him Northern Ireland . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, if she kept those who wish to remain British citizens, and relocated them, I'm sure we could find enough folks 'longing for the old country' in Boston and New York to repopulate it.

  46. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by Megane · · Score: 1

    Wait, what's the dog going to do with an iPod?

    Use it as a chew toy, what did you expect?

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  47. Re:Maybe Japan's Prime Minister will get 20" rims! by cornercuttin · · Score: 1

    and to add, i love the idea that we (the US) give away a bunch of Chinese-made products, made by people who are probably in not-so-good working conditions. we can't even give away something made in America.

    just wait till she plugs that iPod into a computer in the Buckingham network. i bet China has some sort of virus embedded in that thing. they are about to own MI6!!!

  48. A Special iPod by TooMad · · Score: 1

    But what the news doesn't mention was the iPod was made from recycled SuperBabies: Baby Geniuses 2 DVDs.

  49. How is the signed photo a common item? by name_already_taken · · Score: 1

    Personally, I think the Queen's gift is the worst out of all those listed (in all the linked articles) anyway - it's too imperialist and overbearing... a signed photo... "Look, I have given you something cheap and readily available to remind you that you were once in my presence". Urk.

    Yeah, she hands one of those things to everyone who walks past Buckingham Palace. I've got four of the damned things already. She won't take no for an answer, you have to take the thing or she yells at you and has her guards chase you away. At least you can melt the silver frame down and make some money. </sarcasm>

    Are you serious? Regardless of the expense, or lack of it (it's probably a very expensive frame, not something from the Hallmark store), a signed photograph of Liz II is not a common item.

    And, if you think about it, if you're in her position, meeting some dignitary or other literally every other day, you'd probably standardize on some gift like that too.

    Maybe the Obama White House should consider doing something similar (although a signed photo is probably not a good idea for someone who isn't a monarch).

    I do have to wonder what an 80-something year old who has staff to do everything for her is going to do with an iPod. Doesn't seem like all that great an idea.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
    1. Re:How is the signed photo a common item? by ledow · · Score: 1

      Who said "common"? I said "readily available"... as in they don't have to do anything special to get hold of one (similar to how Obama was criticised for offering gifts that looked like they came out of the White House gift shop). There aren't going to be many of these things about, granted, but then it's not exactly a *gift* either. You aren't going to go home and stick it on your mantlepiece unless you're one of the common people, and she's supposed to be giving this to *dignitaries*?! It's like a bad joke you might hear about a celebrity... they're so "up themselves" that they give out signed photos instead of paying their bills in restaurants etc.

    2. Re:How is the signed photo a common item? by RobBebop · · Score: 1

      JFK used to give out replicas of the sword George Washington used during the Revolutionary War to visiting dignitaries. There is a version of it on display in his museum in Boston. It's pretty, and who doesn't love a good sword?

      --
      Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
  50. If the British press can't find something... by EWAdams · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... to bitch about America over, they will pull something out of their own ass. The last time the British press was polite and respectful towards America was D-Day.

    There's a recession on, people. Do you really expect Obama to be handing out diamond necklaces? How's that going to look?

    Also, both sides know perfectly well that whatever they give, the other side won't be allowed to keep it as a matter of anti-corruption policy. Every single gift given to an American president goes straight into a vault. So there's no point in giving anything really expensive.

    --
    I piss off bigots.
    1. Re:If the British press can't find something... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a recession on, people. Do you really expect Obama to be handing out diamond necklaces? How's that going to look?

      much better than him forcing through legislation that allowed bonuses to bailed out ceos and after the fact going off like he had no idea.

      american citizens and most legislators have given the man a blank check at this point and all he does is act outraged when his hand is caught in the cookie jar and everyone acts like it's ok. what if bush would have done the same?

    2. Re:If the British press can't find something... by iainl · · Score: 1

      Which would be a perfectly fine criticism, if the British Press were bitching about it. The reality is that one paper wrote an opinion piece, which the US Press then blew out of all proportion into some monumental shitstorm. I'm reasonably up to speed with the news here, but the first I even knew of 'my shock and offense' was when Americans suddenly started apologising for it on Obama's behalf.

      Which was odd, to say the least.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    3. Re:If the British press can't find something... by itsdapead · · Score: 1

      Also, both sides know perfectly well that whatever they give, the other side won't be allowed to keep it as a matter of anti-corruption policy.

      Which means that symbolic pen-holders and signed photos of heads of state (which can be used on official occasions* and/or look good in a glass case in the White House museum) are very appropriate choices, whereas iPods and boxed sets of Hollywood Greats DVDs do have, as TFA said, an air of Dulles Airport gift shop about them.

      Of course, perhaps the DVDs were made from polycarbonate taken from the windows of the Space Shuttle...

      Agreed that there may be more important things going on in the world, though.

      (* Ding-dong. "Oh shit, its the Queen! Quick, get that photo she gave us at the G20 summit out of the attic... Uh-ho, Gordon's with her and he'll probably want us to sign his bloody treaty so get that nice pen and holder too - don't know who used this desk last, but all I can find in the drawers are crayons... )

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    4. Re:If the British press can't find something... by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Funny
      The last time the British press was polite and respectful towards America was D-Day.

      Actually, it was the day before D-Day. On D-Day itself, the coverage ran something like 'Thank God, they're all in France now.'

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    5. Re:If the British press can't find something... by greysky · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Every single gift given to an American president goes straight into a vault. So there's no point in giving anything really expensive.

      Yes and no. Take a tour of a presidential library sometime. It's facinating to see what gifts other nations gave our presidents. I recently visited the Clinton library, and the gifts there ranged from unique pieces of art, to one of the bikes Lance Armstong rode in the Tour. Some gifts had little monetary value, others were of immesuarbale worth. But they all personified either the person that gave the gift or the people that person represented. Bush 43 would frequently give handmade cowboy boots with big "W"s on them. Rarely are state gifts about the recipient - they are about the giver, and are also symbolic of the relationship between the two parties. So if you think about it, a box set of DVDs is actually quite symbolic, and not necessarily in a negative way, as is the iPod. What's more American than a portable music player these days? And don't say "a failing bank kept afloat with public funds" -- the UK already has those.

    6. Re:If the British press can't find something... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "Every single gift given to an American president goes straight into a vault. So there's no point in giving anything really expensive."

      Not true. The Resolute Desk was a gift from Queen Victoria.

    7. Re:If the British press can't find something... by irving47 · · Score: 1

      Well, the vault part might be a bit metaphoric, but they only get to keep 1-2 items, personally, at the end of their term. I thought I heard the Clintons tried to squirrel away a few more.

      --
      I had a sucky sig.
    8. Re:If the British press can't find something... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      And don't say "a failing bank kept afloat with public funds" -- the UK already has those.

      Aw man! Oh well at least I kept my receipt. But now I have to think of something else to get them.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    9. Re:If the British press can't find something... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently you're missing the point: The financial value of the gift is fairly irrelevant, but the level of thought that went into the two gifts is markedly different. That is what is being criticised.

      On a side note, it could be Brown who is out of step by giving too personal a gift.

    10. Re:If the British press can't find something... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the puppies that the Peruvians gave Obama?

    11. Re:If the British press can't find something... by EdwinFreed · · Score: 1

      As I recall, the line was that the Yanks were "Oversexed, overpaid and over here".

  51. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by o'reor · · Score: 2, Funny

    OTOH, the Obama administration has looked so clueless so far about that "new dog for the White House" business, it probably wouldn't be a good idea...

    --
    In Soviet Russia, our new overlords are belong to all your base.
  52. Is Obama's personal player known as... by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... iPod One ?

  53. Holy Shit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obama and ipod in the same story! How many of you Slashbots touched yourselves when you saw that headline?

  54. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by pisto_grih · · Score: 3, Informative

    yeah, its 2009, we have multi-region players in this country. Have had them for years. In fact, my first budget player was multi-region. No codes or chips required.

  55. Bill Gates' wife and kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is funny. Even the Queen Of England has got an iPod now.

    I guess that Bill Gates' family will have to continue to make do with some non-Apple product....

  56. EVERYTHING is copyrighted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And since when has RIAA/PRS or any of the other wankers worried about whether there was a genuine copyright issue before suing???

  57. Why not more practical gifts? by east+coast · · Score: 5, Funny

    Chief Lincoln of the Americas offers you Construction in return for Invention and 126 gold!

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  58. ATTN RIAA? by boxxa · · Score: 1

    I wonder if it was loaded with downloaded Beatles albums.

    --
    Bryan
  59. Re:The "Anti Slave Ship" is worth about a klan hoo by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 2, Funny

    Still bitter McCain lost I see...Too bad we didn't elect that political prodigy Sarah Palin.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  60. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by neomunk · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ...but not in real life, cause you'd get your ass beaten, wouldn't ya pussies?

    Yeah, better to hide behind a screen and keyboard when proving you're a toughguy who isn't afraid of the consequences of his actions. You're so pathetic as to not even use your login name.

    That's why you troglodytes are irrelevant, and that's why you're going to feel more and more 'oppressed' as white privilege dissolves into equality. The best part of it is, racism is being selected against in our population (by mixed-race children becoming far more common), so you're not only irrelevant, you're obsolete.

    Now be good little monkeys and keep your shit-slinging and masturbation over in your corner where it belongs.

  61. I knew he was cool by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 0

    Obama, has our back people, he gave something this cool to the queen, who herself has her head up her ass....."yes , here take a picture of me, and you can sit and admire me from afar"

    Silly girl, pics are for kids!
    If you give a picture of yourself to a guy, at least make sure you are wearing 3 inch heels and leather...with some make up and such. Leave it to a woman to send something totally useless.

    What does she get, an Ipod (score 1), with tons of music and videos (score 2) and also a photo album of her trip to the US (score 3 and 4 because we know she likes to look at herself!)

    I am resting assured, someone like Obama doing a great deed like this...proves he is up with the times.

    Peace bro, keep up the good work!

    1. Re:I knew he was cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People like you is why America is blindly letting Obama put the USA in the poor house.

        He could do no wrong because he is pandering to me! He likes what I like, therefore anything he does has a "cool factor," which helps me ignore the retardedness he is giving us! w00t w00t! Keep being cool Obama, cuz the cooler you are the more I will ignore your shit!

      Seriously, are you still in High School?

  62. Every Queen has a silver lining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just remember that every Queen, no matter how grey, has a silver lining.

    Best wishes.
    Lizzy.

  63. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The summary doesn't even mention that the DVDs that Obama gave Brown were encoded for the USA,

    That's because nobody knows whether they were. There was just some speculation in the tech press.

    and therefore wouldn't play on DVD players in Britain.

    US DVDs seem to work pretty well for me.

  64. Wouldn't it be by KefkaZ · · Score: 0, Redundant

    a WePod instead of an iPod?

  65. Re:More evidence by Lakitu · · Score: 1

    are you really this stupid?

    What do you think the chances are that President Obama went to a Best Buy or wherever and bought some DVDs he liked to give to Queen Elizabeth?

  66. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well said, I have had the pleasure of meeting Her Majesty, and I can tell you she is no simpleton. She is an intelligent witty person, who actually has a "can do" mind.

    People forget that in WW2, she drove ambulances carrying injured people to the Hospital. She is a trained mechanic, and does actually know more about cars and engines than most normal people.

    She even has a blackberry, which she uses to keep in touch with her grandchildren. Talking of Grandchildren, Remember Princess Beatrice once said "she is lucky to have a cool grandmother"

    She is a charming, intelligent and lovely person, and one of the things that makes me as a Brit, feel proud.

    God Bless you maam.

    --
    Have a nice day!
  67. This makes news? by homesnatch · · Score: 0

    The president fired a CEO in private industry and we're interested in a gift exchange? Very scary...

  68. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Funny

    People forget that in WW2, she drove ambulances carrying injured people to the Hospital.

    She was on the allied side, despite the fact that her real surname is "Achtungschweinhund Hollenstollen Von Saxe-Koburg Gutenberg".

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  69. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    U.S.->U.K. transplant here: In my experience, some of the DVDs I brought over work, and some don't. The Playstation 2 I brought with me will happily play all the "some don't" ones, though.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  70. All hail Lord Brown! by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    I don't even understand the controversy. 25 DVD's is a pretty damn good gift. Maybe the Brits don't understand that, in the U.S., giving exquisite gifts to politicians is a MAJOR no-no (unless you're Ted Stevens, of course). I'm surprised they even gave him that much. A U.S. politician couldn't accept anything in excess of $335 in value as a gift from a foreign leader. Maybe His Majesty Lord Gordon is used to having suitcases full of cash and rare art handed to his pampered ass by other countries. But we're the U.S. We only give *that* kind of tribute to big corporations, banks, and Iraqi contractors.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:All hail Lord Brown! by icebrain · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't even understand the controversy. 25 DVD's is a pretty damn good gift. Maybe the Brits don't understand that, in the U.S., giving exquisite gifts to politicians is a MAJOR no-no (unless you're Ted Stevens, of course). I'm surprised they even gave him that much. A U.S. politician couldn't accept anything in excess of $335 in value as a gift from a foreign leader.

      It's pretty much standard here that diplomatic gifts aren't kept by the President; they're accepted on behalf of, and given over to, the American people. I'd imagine that it's pretty much the same in the UK; "suitcases full of cash and rare art" would be state-to-state gifts that just happen to be presented by/to individuals acting as representatives to their people.

      Diplomatic gifts aren't really supposed to be personal anyways. The pen and case aren't for Obama to take home and use for paying his bills; they'll most likely be displayed for a little while, possibly used to sign some kind of treaty or trade agreement with the UK, and eventually filed away in a box somewhere. It might eventually go on display at whatever Presidential library Obama builds, but would remain the property of the United States and just be loaned to said library.

      --
      The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
    2. Re:All hail Lord Brown! by hobbit · · Score: 1

      A U.S. politician couldn't accept anything in excess of $335 in value as a gift from a foreign leader.

      Mr. Brown gave Mr. Obama a pen holder carved from the timber of an anti-slave ship.

      Where can I get a pen holder carved from the timber of an anti-slave ship for $335 or less? Thanks!

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    3. Re:All hail Lord Brown! by Jiro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The amusing part is that since Obama's black ancestry is from modern Africa, but his white ancestry is from the US, he's a descendant of slaveholders, but not of slaves. Giving him something from an anti-slave ship may not be as positive as it seems.

    4. Re:All hail Lord Brown! by jabithew · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is the same. In fact, if MPs wish to accept a gift personally, they have to pay its full market value. That includes the Prime Minister. There was a funny story at the start of Blair's first term; President Chirac sent him some rare and expensive French wine as a birthday gift. As Ian Hislop commented at the time;

      He's basically sent Blair a large fine.

      The Daily Show thought it was bad too, it wasn't only the British media. It won't affect relations between the US and the UK, but it does show a lack of awareness of the world on the part of the Obama administration.

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    5. Re:All hail Lord Brown! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depending on when his European ancestors emigrated, and where in the U.S. they lived.

    6. Re:All hail Lord Brown! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh Ted Stevens... the charges were dropped against him for prosecutorial misconduct.

      Try "Chris Dodd" instead. Oh wait, that doesn't fit your political bias...

    7. Re:All hail Lord Brown! by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      You presume to know my politics. But you should know that I despise and distrust BOTH major parties (and quite a few minor ones too). If you think corruption is predominant in any one political party (or that any one political party is more resistant to it than any other), then YOU'RE the sucker, not I. And you're also a sucker if you think that "dropped charges" is the same as "innocent" in the case of Ted Stevens or any other crooked, grafting politician. If they dropped the charges against William Jefferson, would you suddenly just presume that he was only hording stacks of cash in his freezer by accident? The only reason the Justice Dept. dropped charges against Stevens is because he's old, out of office now, and not worth the hassle. Ditto if they drop charges against Jefferson.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    8. Re:All hail Lord Brown! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually for employees of the British gorvernment if they want to keep gifts over a certain (very low) value they have to pay the treasury the value of the gift. This is to prevent corruption (obviously).

      It's not about the value of the gift to Brown himself, the gift-giving is a PR excercise, and you can certainly argue that this time round at least, the White House has fucked it up.

    9. Re:All hail Lord Brown! by Arcane_Rhino · · Score: 1
      No. The reason they dropped the case is due to prosecutorial misconduct, including suppressing favorable evidence and falsifying evidence. (It will actually make an interesting movie one day.)

      At any rate, whether you think he is innocent, guilty or somewhere in between it is a "wake the fuck up call".

      When the DOJ will engage is such behavior against a sitting and powerful Senator, we, the nobody citizens, are in a very precarious situation.

    10. Re:All hail Lord Brown! by kc4iai · · Score: 1

      Did the DVD's given play on British systems? Here we use NTSC and there the system is PAL. DVD's for Reigon 1 are not the same as those sold there. http://visionandpsychosis.net/

  71. You are wrong by Xest · · Score: 2, Informative

    Queen is just a hereditary title and can be used like any other title including social titles like Mr, Dr, Sir, Mrs and so on.

    Using the term Queen Elizabeth without specifying which Queen Elizabeth is no less correct than referring to someone called Paul who is a Dr. as Dr. Paul. The only reason you'd want to specify is if there were multiple Dr. Pauls you could be referring to, but seeing as the summary quite clearly points out he met a living Queen there is no room for ambiguity and so there is no need to refer to her as Queen Elizabeth II.

    Using Queen Elizabeth is merely an informal way of referring to her.

    If you were writing a book on English Queens then yes, you would be wise to use Queen Elizabeth II to make it clear who is being referred to. As we're talking about someone visiting the living Queen of England, no, there is no need.

    1. Re:You are wrong by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      And yet, if I were to mention Dr. Phil out of context, I have little doubt that most people here would assume I meant this guy and not, say, this guy.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    2. Re:You are wrong by Xest · · Score: 1

      Well yes, isn't context a wonderful thing?

      Luckily taking a visit to Queen Elizabeth out of context is quite hard when only one is alive.

  72. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by mhall119 · · Score: 0

    Obligatory XKCD: http://xkcd.com/541/

    --
    http://www.mhall119.com
  73. Couldn't give a GM car - nobody wants them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He wanted to give her a GM car, then a staffer pointed out that nobody wants them.
    He has to give them something designed in the USA and made in China.

    I hope the British security guys carefully validated the hardware and firmware on the device. If it was an iPhone, now she's stuck with a 2 year AT&T contract too! Nobody should ever give a cell phone without paying for the entire contract period.

  74. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mr Brown does not have ur 733t h4kk1n sk1lz.

    What am I on about? He doesn't have any skills, the fat Scottish twat.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  75. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by mhall119 · · Score: 1

    It seems kind of 'tarded to give a 70+ year old woman an ipod with a tiny screen

    The Queen actually already had an iPod, has for a few years now.

    --
    http://www.mhall119.com
  76. History texts by Oyjord · · Score: 0

    Pres. Obama should have given her some modern World History texts to help the Queen understand that the very institution of monarchy is a dated and now worthless concept.

    1. Re:History texts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking Brits should be embarrassed that they even have a queen. Bow down peasants!

  77. God save the queen's husband! by niktemadur · · Score: 1

    You know, there's probably a lot of people out there who enjoy the idea of finding themselves in front of the queen, getting a framed portrait from her, which is the height of conceit, then saying "I've got something for you too, Your Highness", reaching inside the suit jacket, and coming out with an extended middle finger.

    I'd rather join Prince Philip for cigars and a bottle of whiskey, provided we'd get to cruise down to the liquor store in his Gran Torino.

    Check the above link, the dude's off the hook! He's like, the original, blue blooded troll of Royal Affairs, long considered a national treasure in the Isles, one of their guilty pleasures.
    During an appearance in some college in the UK, so the story goes, some black and handicapped students made sure to stand in his path to the podium, purposefully attempting to coax an insensitive royal remark or two. To the disappointed groans of the students and the audience alike, Prince Philip passed on the opportunity. However, when you think about it, this was about as insensitive as delivering one of his patented absent-minded insults, so score another win for the man.

    --
    Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
  78. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Well it didn't get modded flamebait...

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  79. No "squirting" by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

    At her age, are you sure about that?

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:No "squirting" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot needs a +1 treason mod. Five hundred years ago a remark like that could have got you executed.

    2. Re:No "squirting" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably an American. I think they skirted the treason thing, WRT to Her Majesty, over 230 years ago, just shortly before the Queen was crowned, no?

  80. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sorry to answer myself again, but I believe she has an iPod already.. since 2005... a 6GB iPod mini.

    Its pretty well known actually (google queen ipod).

    Not sure what she uses it for, but if i remember rightly, she (or maybe Prince Philip) are avid podcast listeners.

    --
    Have a nice day!
  81. Made in China. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    So we gave a gift to the Queen of England of a product made in China...
    What more can I say. The US has got to stop being a colony of China.
    Yes I said a colony. The traditional role of a colony was to provide raw material and absorb manufactured goods.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  82. What we really want to know is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the queen gave the Obamas a silver-framed signed photograph

    ... does it run Linux?

  83. Not Silly by Mycroft_514 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It goes to show the lack of class in the man and his administration. The two gifts mentioned from the British were classy gifts, and were well thought out.

    The gifts from the Obama administration don't have a clue what class is.

    Expect more of the same until we impeach and fire this clown of a president.

    1. Re:Not Silly by ledow · · Score: 1

      "don't have a clue what class is."

      Yes. He's American. Again, back to my original point, who cares?

      Are we trying to outclass each other in the gift stakes or do our bloody job? Personally, I've have a million times more respect for a politician who pre-announced that he wouldn't be buying the other anything because it would be a waste of taxpayers money, and then met in a restaurant or a cafe to sort it all out instead of going for a big over-the-top, you-are-welcome-in-my-country introduction with red carpet etc. I'm waiting for a prime minister/president who turns up to an official engagement in his own car, hops out, gets straight to business, sorts things out and then the *second* he is finished hops back into the car and onto his next appointment. It would show me that he was working for his money.

    2. Re:Not Silly by EmperorKagato · · Score: 2, Informative

      Impeach him for what?

      --
      ----- You know you have ego issues when you register a domain in your name.
    3. Re:Not Silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Expect more of the same until we impeach and fire this clown of a president.

      Expect to be writing such drivel for the next 4, and probably 8 years.

    4. Re:Not Silly by zx-15 · · Score: 1

      Impeach? WTF? who modded this insightful?

    5. Re:Not Silly by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Right, because his predecessor was sooooo much better at this sort of thing, huh?

      Spare me your sour grapes, and suck it up. Apparently your candidate lost, and now all you can do is complain about very unimportant and petty things, that's sad.

    6. Re:Not Silly by gentlemen_loser · · Score: 2, Informative

      It goes to show the lack of class in the man and his administration. The two gifts mentioned from the British were classy gifts, and were well thought out.

      The gifts from the Obama administration don't have a clue what class is.

      Expect more of the same until we impeach and fire this clown of a president.

      I am not entirely sure what you are saying? Do you not recall Bush? The tool that gave Angela Merkel (the prime minister of Germany) a back massage at a meeting? How about the time he winked at the Queen of England? Or when he addressed a room full of donors by saying something to the effect of: "Quite an impressive room of people here, the haves, and the have mores...". The same guy who got us involved in two wars and ushered in the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.

      And YOU have the gall to call Obama a "clown of a president" who needs to be impeached? Seriously? If you were marked troll, I would have let your comments go and not even read your post. The fact that somehow, you ended up listed as insightful absolutely astounds me. Given the stark contrast of character between the two men, a grass roots community organizer vs. a man who shirked his military duties, you must need a wheelbarrow to carry your balls around in.

      Finally, as a general rule, anyone who finds a need to use the term "class" in the same context you did in your post typically has none themselves.

    7. Re:Not Silly by Mycroft_514 · · Score: 0, Troll

      >I am not entirely sure what you are saying? Do you not recall Bush? The tool that gave Angela Merkel (the prime minister of Germany) a back massage at a meeting? How about the time he winked at the Queen of England? Or when he addressed a room full of donors by saying something to the effect of: "Quite an impressive room of people here, the haves, and the have mores...". The same guy who got us involved in two wars and ushered in the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.

      As for the two wars - right you are, and WHO was attacked first? And we were attacked because a previous weakling of a president let things go for too long - Clinton .... As for who brought in this economic downfall, look no further than the Democrats. Barney Frank, Bill Clinton and even all the way back to Jimmy Carter are the ones who did this to us. Bush tried to head it off several years ago and was stopped by Pelosi, Reid and Barney Frank.

      >And YOU have the gall to call Obama a "clown of a president" who needs to be impeached? Seriously? If you were marked troll, I would have let your comments go and not even read your post. The fact that somehow, you ended up listed as insightful absolutely astounds me. Given the stark contrast of character between the two men, a grass roots community organizer vs. a man who shirked his military duties, you must need a wheelbarrow to carry your balls around in.

      As for the crack about shirking his duties. Shows where your sour grapes are. George Bush served his time honorably and has the paperwork to prove it. Where was Obama? Won't even produce his proper birth certificate to prove that he actually is a Native born American!

      Obama has no character, associate of terrorists that he is. No experience doing anything --- and it shows. He is in contention for worst president of all time - after how many days? As for 4 or 8 years. Don't be ton him getting re-elected. He has shown so many characteristics of a one term president already. And Congress will probably swing back to the GOP in 2010, after PElosi and Reid are shown for the buffoons they are.

      >Finally, as a general rule, anyone who finds a need to use the term "class" in the same context you did in your post typically has none themselves.

      We see now why you don't have any mod points.

    8. Re:Not Silly by gentlemen_loser · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'll bite. First, do address your comments about our president not being a citizen. This is patently a false roumor: Snopes

      Secondly, you are right, we were attacked first, by a FRACKING terrorist organization! Not the Afgan government and certainly not the Iraqis. Our country would be in an infinitely stronger diplomatic, security, and financial position if we tackled the problem through diplomacy, covert operations, and sanctions against countries supporting terrorist activities. Instead, we opted for a dick-wagging contest resulting in thousands of lost lives, billions of dollars expended, and our international credibility and goodwill pissed away.

      I agree with you that Pelosi and Reid are idiots. Its sad that the democrats do not have better leadership in congress right now and I think it will probably cost them. However, I have heard rumblings from the right lately about Obama being a one termer. I suspect this is because he scares the shit of them because he is articulate and intelligently tackles problems. How could you possibly say worst president of all time?!?

  84. Problem by Squeeonline · · Score: 0

    Just wait til the RIAA get wind of this pre-loaded content, even if it was given as a "gift".

  85. Queens are people too by FauxPasIII · · Score: 1

    Which would you rather get?

    --
    25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
  86. Commander in Chief of the military by fantomas · · Score: 2, Informative

    The queen has no role in the security status of her government

    The Queen is Commander in Chief of the UK military..

    1. Re:Commander in Chief of the military by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      The Queen is Commander in Chief of the UK military..

      And it is the monarch, not the Parliament, of the UK that declares war (there was note, at the time, of the unusualness of Tony Blair's move in even calling for an advisory vote in Parliament on the Iraq war.)

  87. Just pathetic really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All Obama has to offer is some entertainment dross produced by the people he REALLY represents - not the US people - the US entertainment INDUSTRY! So he really is a RIAA, MPAA lackey.
    Fucking sad.

    I just hope Tropic Thunder was on there. The only good film out of Whorywood for years...

  88. Re:The "Anti Slave Ship" is worth about a klan hoo by Tiber · · Score: 1

    Can't change history.

    Those who aren't aware are doomed to repeat it.

    Don't kill the messenger and all that.

    Frankly if I were Obama I would stab the guy in the neck with his "gift".

  89. Re:More evidence by TyrainDreams · · Score: 1

    What's really sad is this is just proof that the UK isn't ready to be mature about global politics, last I checked it had been a while since our leaders would give each other spectacular gifts of gold and jewels. The economy suffers, sorry were fresh out of golden turkeys for your diamond hatted ass.

    Fuck the queen. Its not about gifts. Its about the people who now have to work together to fix this mess of a world. Its not going to be fancy gifts that do that, it will be bright thinking and cooperation. If the Brits are really worried about what my president gave their queen and PM they can go toss off in the back while real shit gets done.

  90. But this is a video iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And like you said, her old one is a few year, has less storage and doesn't do videos. So a new model iPod would not be redundant.

    1. Re:But this is a video iPod by mhall119 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wasn't trying to say this gift was redundant, I was trying to say that an iPod isn't a "retarded" gift for the Queen, as the original poster seemed to think.

      --
      http://www.mhall119.com
  91. So movies are a bad gift by holychicken · · Score: 1

    But a signed picture of yourself is a good gift? Especially considering it is a zero thought gift because you give it to every dignitary that visits.

  92. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by multisync · · Score: 1

    The summary doesn't even mention that the DVDs that Obama gave Brown were encoded for the USA

    If you're basing that on the linked Daily News article, what it actually says is

    Never mind that Brown is blind in one eye and may have a hard time seeing the stars in "2001: A Space Odyssey," or that American DVDs are usually incompatible with British players.

    Do you have information that these were in fact "American" (region 1) DVDs? Or are you just speculating, as the Daily News was?

    --
    I don't care why you're posting AC
  93. Re:The "Anti Slave Ship" is worth about a klan hoo by meringuoid · · Score: 1
    The GANNET was employed to protect British interests and suppress the slave market among the Islamic and African kingdoms, guaranteeing British prices and control of the market.

    She was launched in 1878. Britain had been out of the slave business since 1807, in which year the trade was banned throughout the Empire, and since 1827 had considered any slave ship of any nation to be a pirate and hence fair game for the Royal Navy.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  94. April fools joke? by alta · · Score: 1

    I'm really hoping that since this happened yesterday, it was Obama's idea of an April fools joke. If not, he's the fool. Apparently no one gave him nor our first chaw chewer the standard etiquette lesson before meeting the queen.

    --
    Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
  95. A gift from Ninnle Labs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, not this time. I think the Obamas should have given Liz and Gordie both signed basketballs.

  96. Obama's not playing by the rules... by icebrain · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not the gifts themselves that are the issue... it's the symbolism, if you will.

    See, diplomacy is a game, of sorts, and it's heavily dependent on symbolism. Things like gift exchanges, summit meetings, state dinners, and all that are mostly useless from a practical standpoint... but it's part of the game. They're the rules; to be taken seriously you have to at least play along with them and pretend that you care. It's like Christmastime at the office; you go to the parties and you buy little gifts for each other, not because you really care about everyone or want to hang out with them, but because it smooths things over and is just part of office politics.

    Obama's not playing by the rules. And while the gifts and all that aren't really a big deal, he's committing a diplomatic faux pas--toward his country's closest ally, no less. What makes this (and similar small diplomatic blunders) ironic, and what the European press is starting to make noise about, is that everyone thought Obama would be better at international relations than Bush. True, he has yet to start any wars; but flubbing even the basic, petty, easy stuff like state dinners and symbolic gift exchanges with your closest allies and your historical and powerful military/economic rivals (China and Russia) certainly isn't getting off on the right foot.

    It's like the new guy showing up at the office Christmas party with PBR and dollar store gag gifts for the exchange when everyone else brought drinkable wine or liquor and a $15 gift... then cutting loose a giant fart and laughing loudly about it. Sure, it doesn't really affect business operations, it's just a stupid little party. But now everyone's looking at him kinda funny and thinking "hey, we thought he was cool, but this guy's a bit of an ass." In other words, it may not be harmful, but he certainly isn't doing us any favors.

    --
    The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
    1. Re:Obama's not playing by the rules... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 2

      It's like the new guy showing up at the office Christmas party with PBR and dollar store gag gifts for the exchange when everyone else brought drinkable wine or liquor and a $15 gift... then cutting loose a giant fart and laughing loudly about it. Sure, it doesn't really affect business operations, it's just a stupid little party. But now everyone's looking at him kinda funny and thinking "hey, we thought he was cool, but this guy's a bit of an ass." In other words, it may not be harmful, but he certainly isn't doing us any favors.

      Dunno about you, but I'd definitely rather go to a party with that guy there than the regular boring same ole same ole.

      In other words, Lighten up Francis. It's a frigging gift, not a speech. No wonder this world is so screwed up.

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    2. Re:Obama's not playing by the rules... by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      Obama hates the Brits. Clean and simple. Started with that bust of Churchill he sent back when he moved in.

      My guess (and it's a guess) it has something that the British did to his father in Africa.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    3. Re:Obama's not playing by the rules... by k0de · · Score: 1

      Obama's not playing by the rules. And while the gifts and all that aren't really a big deal, he's committing a diplomatic faux pas--toward his country's closest ally, no less.

      I thought his closest ally was Canada.

      --
      I'm wrong and so are you.
    4. Re:Obama's not playing by the rules... by moderatorrater · · Score: 3, Funny

      See, diplomacy is a game, of sorts

      No kidding. I hear it's pretty cutthroat, too.

    5. Re:Obama's not playing by the rules... by viper34j · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Obviously you missed the entire point of the post you replied to...

    6. Re:Obama's not playing by the rules... by foo+fighter · · Score: 1

      Who gave the PBR and who brought the wine in your story?

      Seems to me a personalized iPod is a way better gift than an autographed head shot.

      If Obama is subverting the rules of the game, good for him. But it seems to me he is only making thoughtful, personal gestures to his guests and hosts. Diplomatic protocol is a least common denominator. Obama is exceeding the minimum requirements, probably in an effort to make up for the last eight years. That anyone is upset by that boggles my mind.

      --
      obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
    7. Re:Obama's not playing by the rules... by thirty-seven · · Score: 1

      ...he's committing a diplomatic faux pas--toward his country's closest ally, no less.

      See Canada-United States Permanent Joint Board on Defence and NORAD.

      --

      Atheism is a religion to the same extent that not collecting stamps is a hobby.

    8. Re:Obama's not playing by the rules... by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      "toward his country's closest ally, no less" What???? I thought you loved me America, you said I was your closest friend. You pig! Sleeping around behind my back, I'll never forgive you. NEVER ... unless you ask nice.

      -------Canada

    9. Re:Obama's not playing by the rules... by mike2R · · Score: 1

      Obama hates the Brits. Clean and simple. Started with that bust of Churchill he sent back when he moved in.

      My guess (and it's a guess) it has something that the British did to his father in Africa.

      Obama really doesn't strike me as the sort of guy who bears grudges through 2 generations.. lets face it he'd have some bigger axes to grind than against Britain if he did.

      That said Obama is obviously no anglophile, doesn't mean he hates Britain, just that he has about us much knowledge of and interest in Britain as the average educated American - in other words not a great deal of either.

      Not necessarily a bad thing from a British perspective. There have been anglophile presidents before and I can't remember an occasion when that meant Britain got something it wanted that wasn't in American interests. Relations between the US and UK have always been founded on cultural links and shared interests, the attitude of the incumbent president isn't irrelevant but isn't that big an influence as far as I can see.

      --
      This sig all sigs devours
    10. Re:Obama's not playing by the rules... by doug141 · · Score: 1

      The news here, and some on the web, are reporting the queen asked for the ipod. The odd thing I noticed on the evening news was the queen's lack of eye contact during the greet.

    11. Re:Obama's not playing by the rules... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She's the Queen of Canada too.

    12. Re:Obama's not playing by the rules... by illumin8 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's like the new guy showing up at the office Christmas party with PBR and dollar store gag gifts for the exchange when everyone else brought drinkable wine or liquor and a $15 gift... then cutting loose a giant fart and laughing loudly about it. Sure, it doesn't really affect business operations, it's just a stupid little party. But now everyone's looking at him kinda funny and thinking "hey, we thought he was cool, but this guy's a bit of an ass." In other words, it may not be harmful, but he certainly isn't doing us any favors.

      Um, actually, I think an iPod pre-loaded with content that the queen finds entertaining (show tunes, video of her appearances) is quite relevant and a tasteful gift.

      Compare and contrast this with GW Bush's near sexual assault of the German president trying to give her a "back rub". Obama has a long way to go before he stoops to Bush's level of diplomacy.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    13. Re:Obama's not playing by the rules... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hell, I like PBR!

    14. Re:Obama's not playing by the rules... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 1

      Obviously.

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    15. Re:Obama's not playing by the rules... by chochos · · Score: 1

      So Obama is now the Michael Scott of presidents?
      And I was kinda worried about the Mexico City governor being identical to Dwight...

    16. Re:Obama's not playing by the rules... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 1

      Actually, in re-reading the stupid thing, no, actually I didn't.

      What the idiot who modded me troll also didn't realize is that I thought it was refreshing that he gave her the gifts he did and while it might be a frigging "break from normal diplomacy" whatever the hell that means, it's nice that he put some effort into it (or had an aide do so) rather than just give some stupid signed picture...to anyone and everyone who drops by for a "state visit".

      That's lame, shows absolutely no thinking whatsoever, and is one of the things that's actually wrong with this world today.

      But whatever, you guys by happy with lame "normal" diplomacy, I'll be over here saying it's nice that he did something different. And honestly, if this has the frigging "world community" up in arms, then I guess we're all doing a whole hell of a lot better than has been reported since we've got such a stupid little thing to pick a nit over.

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    17. Re:Obama's not playing by the rules... by rgarbacz · · Score: 1

      But the point is that gifts on this level of relationships are not suppose to be something one takes home and plays with. Such gifts (in most cases) are stored in special places to show for coming generations, kind of an autograph of a person who once was a country leader.

      So lets see, in 30 years, someone visiting the White House can see the collection, and among many objects a carved pen holder, and a signed portrait of the queen of GB, on the other hand, on the other side of the Atlantic someone can see a long not working iPod and a set of DVDs coded with region 1 (US), (a tape-record and a set of vinyl plates in today's vocabulary) - stuff one can buy in an antique shop around the corner.

      How many signed portraits of the queen of GB, and how many iPods there are in the world.

      It is nice it is original and modern, it is nice it embraces the future not the past, but it would be nice if it was kind of unique.

    18. Re:Obama's not playing by the rules... by David_Hart · · Score: 1

      What everyone is missing is that the gifts were vetted long before the President's visit. In addition, the Queen, according to all accounts, has a couple of iPods, but may not have the latest model (my guess is that the President gift was the latest video iPod). In fact, she also has a BlackBerry, same model as the President's. So it could just be that the Queen is a gadget freak, just like a lot of us and was perfectly happy with a Tech gift. After all, how many silver, gold, diamond encrusted thingamabobs do you need?

      To the people saying that a Tech gift is not personal, a tech gift can be just as personal as any other gift. All you have to do is customize it for the person you are giving it to (i.e. an iPod full of Blues music to a blues fan, etc.).

      David

    19. Re:Obama's not playing by the rules... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's ironic is that people are angry and think that giving DVD's is insulting and that it makes Obama a worse diplomat than Bush, when all Bush did was drag them into an illegal war and get their soldiers killed. Talk about having your priorities screwed. The end is nigh.

    20. Re:Obama's not playing by the rules... by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      You know, I'd love an iPod as a gift. Having said that...

      First off, this is Queen Elizabeth II, who has been reigning since 1952. Her first Prime Minster was Winston Churchill. She might know what an iPod is, but I'd be flabbergasted if she had any interest in one at all.

      Second, even if she was like, "We have been most interested in obtaining a device such as this one since we saw it demonstrated by Mr. Jobs," she's not going to get to keep it, it's going in a museum or something, and WTF are you going to do with an iPod in a museum?

      I admit, my first impression was: hey that's a cool gift, much better than some dumb photo! And then I figured out that the uneasy feeling I had was due to the fact that you don't give an iPod as a gift to an 82-year old Queen. It's not nice to confuse the shit out of the nice old lady who isn't even going to keep the thing anyway.

    21. Re:Obama's not playing by the rules... by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      I don't see your point. Since when do you confuse a US state with a foreign ally?

    22. Re:Obama's not playing by the rules... by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

      That's why I freelanced for so long and have convenient excuses to not show at (all of the boring) company social functions. People who give that waste-of-time value have a rod stuck up their ass on a permanent basis.

      Or you're a UKtwat who gives such crap the utmost of importance rather than - oh I dunno - living your life (what little of it you have left). I swear it must be a European charter that they can't be happy unless they're making "sacrifices" and otherwise being miserable. Might have something to do with the weather.

      Here's a thought - if you do what makes you happy, you're chances of being an asshole to those around you diminishes. What a concept. Forced smiles aren't fooling anyone.

    23. Re:Obama's not playing by the rules... by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they were the wrong region discs. That'd be amusing for the tabloids. Ponce gives Prime 50 movies he can't play.

      Otherwise it's the Uk media being fucking twats - aka - business as usual.

    24. Re:Obama's not playing by the rules... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I

      It's like the new guy showing up at the office Christmas party with PBR and dollar store gag gifts

      I would have been pumped if someone showed up at my company's Christmas party with PBR...

    25. Re:Obama's not playing by the rules... by icebrain · · Score: 1

      It's one thing for an individual to skip expected social functions. Nothing much comes of it. It's quite another for a diplomat or political leader (and, by extension, the entire country he/she represents) to snub a diplomatic event. You can get away with that if your country is either (a) so powerful nobody can do anything about it, or (b) has no political, military, or economic connections with the others.

      Like press conferences, speeches, public appearances, etc., these events are just part of the job description; gifts, niceties, and state dinners are just matters of protocol, much like one would dress up for an interview, wear a suit to court, play golf with an important supplier or customer, etc.

      In particular, the gift-giving probably goes way back in the history of human civilization. It probably served a real purpose long ago, where giving rare, important, or special gifts was a demonstration of peaceful intent or goodwill.

      What concerns me about this is not the gifts themselves--they're just protocol, like I said above--but rather that they were almost an afterthought. It seems to have completely slipped the mind of the White House diplomatic staff, and I get the impression they made a quick panic run to Wal-mart. I'm probably being cynical, but given that Obama has very little experience with these matters, he either did a very bad job picking his advisors and staff (little or no experience, and therefore couldn't advise him), or he ignored the advice of his staff and made the choices himself. Not sure which one bothers me more.

      --
      The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
    26. Re:Obama's not playing by the rules... by MDMurphy · · Score: 1

      In 30 years they can dedicate one whole wall of the White House to autographed pics of QEII in silver frames. Maybe they'll arrange them in chronological order, Dorian Gray style.

      Even so, it still sounds nicer than DVDs. The least he could have done was bring Blu-Ray.

    27. Re:Obama's not playing by the rules... by Lunzo · · Score: 1

      Diplomacy the game is banned amongst my friends, because we decided that we wanted to stay friends.

    28. Re:Obama's not playing by the rules... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Like bowing to the Saudi monarch? WTF? Hated and feared to laughing stock in two months....

      I hope Obama is good in a crisis because he is stepping all over himself in day-to-day foreign diplomacy.

      Thank god we voted for the candidate with experience.

    29. Re:Obama's not playing by the rules... by Swift2001 · · Score: 1

      What a crock. But you're reciting the "story line" perfectly. The fact is, the iPod was requested. The gifts are never that over-the-top. It's odd. In the story itself you can see the big, greasy fingerprints of the Telegraph, and British tabloids in general: tasteless American offends the monarchy! Michelle Obama touches royalty! But American "conservatives" have adopted this royalist lie because it suits them. They're desperate for any crap to throw against the wall against Obama.

  97. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He has a 5 year old son. It's probably been set up correctly.

  98. Outrageous... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm pretty sure this ipod was assembled in China. How about helping our economy by giving gifts that are American made? Something like..... hmmmm.... like.... hmmmm....

    1. Re:Outrageous... by drig · · Score: 1

      like a bad loan?

      --
      Citizens Against Plate Tectonics
    2. Re:Outrageous... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big deal that it was assembled in China. The sale was clocked to an American company. The software designed by an American company. The concept created by an American company. Many American jobs were created in the process of bringing it to market, and frankly, many American fortunes made because of the choice to have it assembled in China where the workers are efficient, competent, and don't command high union wages that Americans do.

  99. Wait a minute... by paralaxcreations · · Score: 1

    Our President is distributing copyrighted material to others? Sounds like a case for the RIAA...

  100. I am OUTRAGED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our president gives the Queen a nice ipod with pictures from her last visit to the U.S. and a signed book by one of her favorite composers and all the Obamas get is a stupid autographed picture!

    How much you want to bet that picture isn't even personalized? They probably to a dozen at a time and keep them in a stack somewhere.

  101. Re:Maybe Japan's Prime Minister will get 20" rims! by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

    Actually she already has an iPod, bought in 2005, google it.

    She also has a blackberry (uses it to communicate with her grandchildren, etc)

    --
    Have a nice day!
  102. Queen's ipod by motionview · · Score: 0, Troll

    And most importantly, the ipod was loaded with Obamessiah's greatest speeches too (The Queen has trouble sleeping).

  103. Apple & Royal Intervention by Drone69 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I hope once the Queen realizes how quickly her new iPod will become outdated and unsupported she'll take measures to shut down Apple. Consumers need to be rescued from Apple's throwaway-your-expensive-iPod-to-get-the-new-features modus operandi.

  104. What is this stupid shit? Why is this _here_? by jafiwam · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    We give a fark what one rich guy gives to some even richer ho bag? If I want this garbage I will go over to Daily Mail thank you very much.

    Yes, the Prez's Blackberry security is a valid thing to talk about on Slashdot, but this submission seems like a setup for political bashing or royals bashing or just plain stupid gossip and simply has no fucking place here.

    This is why I will never ever pay for Slashdot.

    This is why I block all Slashdot sponsor ads.

    This is why Mr Tard-e McTardison samzenpus' submissions are no longer going to be displayed to me.

    This just in! Chuck Norris took a dump! In his toilet! Wheee! Where is Lindsey Lohan? What type of phone does she use? Oh and Brittany Spears uses Tampax tampons! Oh My GOSH!

    1. Re:What is this stupid shit? Why is this _here_? by chochos · · Score: 1

      I don't know about Norris, but Reznor did, and it's on the news.

  105. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by evilkasper · · Score: 1, Interesting

    By all accounts the Queen is actually into gadgets. She even has a Wii. That aside he could have gotten her something a bit more thoughtful. Isn't he supposed to have people that do this kind of thing for him... wait these are probably the same people that let him do candid appearances; you know where he jokes about the global economic crisis, and references the physically challenged in an inappropriate way.

  106. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by SkyDude · · Score: 1

    It seems kind of 'tarded to give a 70+ year old woman an ipod with a tiny screen filled

    Make that 80+ - she'll be 83 on April 21 - did you get her a birthday card yet? Or maybe an iTunes card?

    --
    == First cross river, then insult alligator.
  107. re: Might be silly, but beats Asian customs! by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    I was just reading an article about the growing market for high-cost luxury goods of all sorts in China, almost exclusively purchased by political figures as gifts for each other.

    Apparently, although much of this gift-giving to earn political favors is technically "illegal", it's standard practice to overlook it if you're a political figure in good standing.

    There's an especially great demand for designer goods that don't have obvious logos or labels, making them look like they're "showing off" their branding. They want the receiver of the gift to notice, after the fact, how costly and top-tier the gift was, without every photographer and witness of the gift exchanging process to know at a glance.
     

  108. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by squoozer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While I am broadly anti the monarchy I have to agree with you that the Queen does do the British people proud. She is a fantastic ambasador for the country (when she leaves the hubby at home) and I believe that unlike just about everyone else in power in Britian she actually earns the money she gets. The rest of the royal family can go jump for all I care though. Charlie Boy is loosing the plot more and more each day and his two sons are spoilt little brats. When the Queen finally leaves office I think it will be the beginning of the end of the British monarchy.

    --
    I used to have a better sig but it broke.
  109. First firing? by BCW2 · · Score: 1

    Whoever the protocol officer is at the White House needs to fired. These lame "gifts" are making us look even more shallow and stupid than most of Europe already thinks.

    --
    Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
  110. Re:Maybe Japan's Prime Minister will get 20" rims! by furby076 · · Score: 1

    but Obama? why is he pulling this crap?

    Being in a younger generation he is more in tune with technology? Also, it's not like he bought an iPod off the shelf and handed it to her - someone did spend time and put on music that she might like. That is thoughtful...then again she gave the President of the United States a picture of her, signed. That's very original and generous of her. I wonder how much thought the Queen put into that gift. So shouldn't you rant on her a bit? The gift he gave was different and thoughtful. Not every gift has to be expensive and extraveggant...and to be honest, she's the f'n Queen of England - it's kind of hard to flash expensive gifts in front of her face and make her go "ohh"..remember she wears the royal jewelry which is worth millions.

    --

    I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
  111. Re:The "Anti Slave Ship" is worth about a klan hoo by Tiber · · Score: 1

    Almost, but not quite. The British had been out of the slave business, but the slaves weren't fully freed in the states until 1865. So the question is why did Britian build an anti-slave ship? Was it because they felt bad and wanted to pour money into it?

    In 1783 the war of independence wrought control of America away from the Empire. The empire then wasn't getting any economic perks from slavery, and the states had pushed the empire out of the americas. The brits now had to fight a proxy war if they wanted any hope of making a second attempt at crushing the colonies.

    I think there's a reasonable argument here that if Britain couldn't enjoy the work of slaves, they weren't going to let anyone else do it either. That's why, in my opinion, the ship should be a slap in the face of Obama.

  112. Problem is lack of thoughtfulness by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I agree mostly, but wanted to add that another big component of showing respect in gift giving is thoughtfulness of the gift chosen - the pen holder carved from an anti-slave ship is an obvious example of this.

    Consumer electronics and media gifts like iPods and DVD's are what you give when your out of ideas. They do not show a good level of understanding of the person you are giving the gift to, although at least the iPod was loaded with pictures of the queens visit... but like all electronics they are ephemeral things, not really gifts to last or provide deeper meaning as you said.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Problem is lack of thoughtfulness by jabithew · · Score: 2, Informative

      As a Brit, I probably shouldn't say this, but I thought the pen was a fantastic gift. The symbolism worked on so many levels. Much like the Resolute desk.

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    2. Re:Problem is lack of thoughtfulness by Archimonde · · Score: 1

      This can be expanded with the answer to a question:

      What do you give as a gift to people who can have anything they want?

      Answer: you give them objects which symbolize or mean something to you and the person receiving the gift.

      For example, a father gives his son granddad's watch for graduation/wedding/something important. He is not giving him a watch because the son doesn't have any, he is giving him a symbol to remind him of the accomplishments he has done (or something in that sense) and the link between these two people. It is even better if the object itself has a some compatible meaning (as that wood pen holder).

      Giving your friend from childhood a car (when he has like 6 of them) for his, lets say, 50th birthday is certainly much less appreciated then giving him an ancient photo(s) of them playing as kids, preferably accompanied with discussing the childhood memories.

      --
      Trolls are like broken clocks. They show the truth two times a day. The rest of the day they talk nonsense.
    3. Re:Problem is lack of thoughtfulness by Lars+T. · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It was an iPod with video and photos of her 2007 trip to the United States. How thoughtless.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    4. Re:Problem is lack of thoughtfulness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As if she doesn't have access to photos and videos of that through her own media and private photographers.

      Barry is an idiot.

    5. Re:Problem is lack of thoughtfulness by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but then your Queen totally dropped the ball. An autographed picture of herself. How narcissistic is that? Obama should just have given her an autographed picture of himself. The symbolism of frugality and restraint for our elite, that's what we need these days.

    6. Re:Problem is lack of thoughtfulness by Mex · · Score: 1

      The pen IS a fantastic gift. It's so thoughtful.

      In this case, the songbook by Richard Rodgers could be equally nice.

    7. Re:Problem is lack of thoughtfulness by quincunx55555 · · Score: 1

      Consumer electronics and media gifts like iPods and DVD's are what you give when your out of ideas. They do not show a good level of understanding of the person you are giving the gift to

      I agree that electronic/media items are common when you're out of ideas. It especially shows in this case since it wasn't an original idea from the Obama family. It's what the Queen herself asked for!

      You can find other sources by searching for "queen elizabeth wanted ipod"

      So the gift was not thoughtless at all.

    8. Re:Problem is lack of thoughtfulness by Coward+Anonymous · · Score: 1

      "another big component of showing respect in gift giving is thoughtfulness of the gift chosen"

      Because a silver framed, autographed picture of herself is such a thoughtful gift and not a condescending exercise in superiority. Everyone should delight in the autographed likeness of her majesty, a leech. Even the most powerful man in the world.

      In light of the photo and its symbolism, an iPod for her majesty is fitting.

    9. Re:Problem is lack of thoughtfulness by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Brown has obviously watched National Treasure.

    10. Re:Problem is lack of thoughtfulness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It was an iPod with video and photos of her 2007 trip to the United States. How thoughtless."

      Given the crap Apple Computer versus Apple the label/Beatles went through, I would have thought it was possibly insulting. Maybe the settlement makes all the difference.

      Obama's relying on Bush material for their gift. I find that oddly funny.

    11. Re:Problem is lack of thoughtfulness by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      It's what the Queen herself asked for!

      The entire text of your link:

      President Obama gave Queen Elizabeth an iPod during their private meeting at Buckingham Palace, the BBC reports. "It contains footage of her state visit to the US in May 2007. The Queen has given the president a silver framed photograph of herself and her husband. The official picture is what she gives all visiting dignitaries."

      The gift exchange was closely watched, the Wall Street Journal reports, "ever since the British press took high exception to the modest presents the Obamas gave Gordon Brown and wife on their visit to the White House last month: a box set of DVDs, allegedly in the wrong format, and a couple of models of Marine One for the Brown boys."

      Where does it say she asked for that?

      Does it say in the same place she asked for video of Obama too?

      And illegally copied music?

      Right.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    12. Re:Problem is lack of thoughtfulness by Matt+Perry · · Score: 1

      Consumer electronics and media gifts like iPods and DVD's are what you give when your out of ideas.

      Or if you're out of ideas and extremely arrogant, you give a picture frame with a picture of yourself. Better yet, just give the same damn picture and frame to everyone. Don't bother to put any thought into it.

      From the NYT article:

      According to news reports here, the queen gave the Obamas a silver-framed signed photograph -- a gift she gives to all visiting dignitaries.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    13. Re:Problem is lack of thoughtfulness by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      "It was an iPod with video and photos of her 2007 trip to the United States. How thoughtless."

      Given the crap Apple Computer versus Apple the label/Beatles went through, I would have thought it was possibly insulting. Maybe the settlement makes all the difference.

      Obama's relying on Bush material for their gift. I find that oddly funny.

      You mean Dubya took the pictures?

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    14. Re:Problem is lack of thoughtfulness by Swift2001 · · Score: 1

      Granny asked for the iPod.

    15. Re:Problem is lack of thoughtfulness by quincunx55555 · · Score: 1

      It appears that Huffington Post changed the text of the article (and added photos, etc). Currently if I do the same search, Huffing Post doesn't even come up; much less the text that it contained. Doing the same search does yield other results though. Next time I link to something I'll include the text. Lesson learned.

      Of course she would ask for illegally copied music. It just ... sounds better. Doesn't it? ;)

  113. How effin' lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really? An iPod? Come on...

  114. where's my fffffing comment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    eh?

  115. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the US is still paying tribute?

  116. For posterity... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

    Every single gift given to an American president goes straight into a vault. So there's no point in giving anything really expensive.

    Exactly. So what's going to look better in a museum a 100 years from now? A nice wooden pencil cup, or a yellowing non-functional iPod?

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  117. Re:The "Anti Slave Ship" is worth about a klan hoo by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    So... what exactly are you saying? He received a gift from PM Gordon Brown, who presented it as a being made from an anti-slave ship, with obvious intended symbolism. And Obama, being properly (dubiously) educated by your post, should have done what? Shouted "Nigga, please! Slave trade protectionism isn't anti-slavery! Get that shit out of here!"

    No, I'm serious. People are riding him for the diplomatic faux paus of cheesy gifts (not surprising, American Presidents have a long tradition of terrible handling of the whole Gifts To/From Heads of State issue). I can't imagine what you'd want him to do with your "information" other than refuse the gift, which would be what order of magnitude more of a faux paus?

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  118. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whites get all the advantages and the "non-whites" are never racist.

  119. Re:Maybe Japan's Prime Minister will get 20" rims! by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    first, he gives the British PM a stack of DVDs (ultra lame). next, he gives the queen of england a friggin ipod

    The DVDs and iPod are not the gifts, they are the packaging. The real value of these gifts is of the content that's on them -- examples of the artistic and cultural outputs of the United States, which have been exported to the world.

    That most of this culture is available to anybody with $300 to spare is not an indictment of Obama's stinginess, nor of America's, but a celebration of our egalitarianism.

  120. Why is everyone ignoring... by Bloopie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why is everyone ignoring the "rare songbook signed by the composer Richard Rodgers"? That could be worth far more than the iPod. Compared to that, the iPod would be a side gift. But that's what the media is focusing on because it's more sensational.

    1. Re:Why is everyone ignoring... by Tuoqui · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree, the songbook is the real gift. The iPod just shows he knows the Queen is tech-savvy and it gives her something to listen to the music on :)

      Technically its not the media that is the judge of the gift exchange but the participants themselves. If the Queen likes the iPod and the songbook and Obama likes the silver framed picture then its all good.

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
  121. So what? by Literaryhero · · Score: 1

    So what?

  122. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was her maiden name. Her married surname is von Battenberg.

  123. I forgot the best part... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

    For the iPod, the museum tag will read "A gift from the American people" and the iPod will say "Made In China" on the back.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  124. It was a thoughtful gift by drig · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Obamas gave the Queen a rare signed songbook by Rick Rodgers, or Rodgers and Hammerstein fame. Rodgers is one of the greatest American composers. The iPod was filled with his music. It was a thoughtful, expensive, classy gift.

    --
    Citizens Against Plate Tectonics
  125. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by timelorde · · Score: 1

    Or one of these

  126. Re:The "Anti Slave Ship" is worth about a klan hoo by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Informative
    In 1783 the war of independence wrought control of America away from the Empire. The empire then wasn't getting any economic perks from slavery, and the states had pushed the empire out of the americas.

    How strange, then, that the plantations in the West Indies that supplied Britain's vast appetite for sugar and rum were even more reliant on slave labour than those on the mainland. And how strange that the Caribbean colonies did not become independent, nor did the newly-formed United States take any action to free them from the Empire. And how strange that even so, the British Empire did indeed abolish the slave trade and then slavery itself, and command the Royal Navy to seize all slavers wherever they might be found.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  127. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by evilkasper · · Score: 1

    I don't see how this is a Troll, since all I have done is point out that President Obama has made some serious mistakes in his public relations recently, and that a person in his position is supposed to have staff to help them with things like this. If that makes me a Troll then I accept that, I mean obviously it is a heinous act to say anything negative about the President.. or should I say THIS President. I'll be under my bridge if you need me.

  128. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She's a nice, smart person who's pretty switched on for her age. Completely accepted.

    Doesn't axiomatically follow that
    1) She's the most qualified candidate to be the Head of State
    2) Her eldest son (nae burdz, nae Tims) will be the most qualified candidate to be the Head of State
    I mean - she (and he) may be, but not axiomatically so.
    (/Tom Payne)

  129. Bah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone know's that Canada's just the US's cold, funny-talking, hockey-playing 51st state.

  130. Re:The "Anti Slave Ship" is worth about a klan hoo by Tiber · · Score: 1

    Absolutely.

    Lets assume you're a known alcoholic. Would it be appropriate to give you a bottle of wine?

  131. Re:Consistency by doug141 · · Score: 1

    Will you settle for consistent hypocrisy? You may have to...

  132. Re:The "Anti Slave Ship" is worth about a klan hoo by Tiber · · Score: 1

    Yes but were the Brits making money? Did the "third party" slave trade help or hurt their interests in India?

    c'mon now.

  133. Stay away from Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best you steer clear of Canada then. For some god-forsaken reason, we're still paying ridiculous sums of money to native communities because their land was taken by the 'white man' a friggin' million years ago. And yet god knows how much of the taxes I pay the government are still being funnelled directly to them.

    Sorry, I had nothing to do with that. MY ancestors had nothing to do with that... we're from the Ukraine. Why in the fuck should I be burdened with paying off native communities when neither myself, nor anyone I've ever been related to was even remotely involved with it?

  134. No thought...how about no reading skills by grapeape · · Score: 1

    Everyone is freaking out over the iPod but what about the signed Richard Rodgers songbook? The queen is an admirer of Rodgers and Hammerstein and he has been dead for 30 years. IMHO alot of thought went into it, its uniquely American and represents a fantastic piece of American culture.

  135. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by interested+pyro · · Score: 0

    well, she could have gotten them this.... but I kinda doubt it

  136. her PR people are tech-savy by peter303 · · Score: 1

    She was oen the first world leaders to use television when that first came out (yes she is that old). One the first to have a website, etc.

  137. Re:It's not an iPod - besides... by kyre42 · · Score: 1

    She already had one, years ago -- does anyone else remember the first series of Spitting Image, showing HM with her iconic headscarf (and tiara) rocking out to something on a headset. The tune was later revealed to be Rule Britannia...

  138. The Queen has Sovereign immunity. by CountBrass · · Score: 1

    She is literally above the law.

    --
    Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    1. Re:The Queen has Sovereign immunity. by gknoy · · Score: 1

      However, the President is not above the law. (At least in theory.)

      I doubt the RIAA is going to be so silly as to sue him, of course, but it's possible that in the process of making what we would consider a reasonable gift, he DID infringe copyrights -- perhaps even without knowing it.

  139. Re:Maybe Japan's Prime Minister will get 20" rims! by illumin8 · · Score: 1

    first, he gives the British PM a stack of DVDs (ultra lame). next, he gives the queen of england a friggin ipod (i'm sure she is really suave on computers...probably has a 24" iMac all modded out).

    Queen Elizabeth II already has owned an iPod for the last two years, given to her by one of her sons. She's not exactly tech illiterate.

    this is so embarrassing. i would've expected it out of President Bush. i bet he got the queen a handgun (big ol' desert eagle), and he probably got Tony Blair a shot-glass set. but Obama? why is he pulling this crap?

    I see nobody can miss a chance to bash whatever president is currently in office. Obama is getting a lot of tempest in a teacup moments lately.

    Newsflash: All politicians and people that appear on TV use teleprompters... Deal with it; it's not news.

    --
    "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
  140. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by prelelat · · Score: 1

    I would hope that she got a new ipod since 2005 I doubt the battery is working so well at this point. If I had a 4 year old mp3 player I would be happy for an upgrade. If she's as much of a tech nut as it seems I think she would love it.

    Also they threw in a bunch of pics and videos of the time they had, thats like scrap booking for the new age.

  141. Re:The "Anti Slave Ship" is worth about a klan hoo by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    Except it wasn't wine, it was seltzer water, from a company who at one point made wine but then became active members of the Prohibitionist movement, but you personally feel that their anti-alcohol activities were really just a way to protect their other business interests and think the alcoholic should reject the seltzer because the underlying... *yawn*

    Let's drop the analogy. You can't dispute that this was in fact an anti-slavery ship, but you think that Britain's anti-slavery activities weren't about the altruistic protection of the civil liberties of people forced into slavery, but rather a way of ensuring Britain's maritime and merchant interests. So fucking what. The actions of a nation-state, at least those of any significant material investment, essentially always are done for the sake of that nation's practical interests with any moral goal being at best secondary. The Emancipation Proclamation, which only applied to rebelling states, was really about morale and hopefully inspiring slave rebellions in the Confederacy rather than freeing the slaves as such. And yet, at least when it could be enforced by Union armies, that's exactly what it did. I'm betting you think Obama is an idiot who doesn't know history for idolizing Lincoln. Or maybe he just has a more realistic view of history, and admires someone who made practical and moral outcomes coincide.

    In any case, an anti-slavery ship that was anti-slavery "for the wrong reasons" is nothing like a slave ship. It's nothing like giving alcohol to an alcoholic.

    To the extent that there's any issue in this story at all, it's a diplomatic issue. Accepting the gift was diplomatically correct. Rejecting the gift, on the basis of your dubious theory, would be idiotic. Yours is the advice of an idiot.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  142. Just one question... by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    What the hell is an "anti-slave ship"?

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
    1. Re:Just one question... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      In this case, a British Navy ship which pulled patrol duty looking for slavers, pirates and the like.

      Back when the British Empire ruled the oceans, it was considered an excellent way to a) train and maintain sailors and b) do some public good.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  143. She asked for one with video of her last visit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go look it up.

    How dare you question Her Majesty's request.

  144. Re:The "Anti Slave Ship" is worth about a klan hoo by Tiber · · Score: 1

    So fucking what?

    Well, tell Obama "so fucking what" next time he brings up affirmative action or slavery and see what kind of reaction you get.

    Or, try saying the War in Iraq isn't about oil.

  145. Re: Obama and the Queen by cagrin · · Score: 0, Troll

    There are many who still say Obama may actually be a subject of the queen of england (born in Kenya)...but regardless, even if he wasn't, there is much evidence that he is working for the banking families of the US who are ultimately controlled out of London, england...if you haven't seen it yet: Movie - The Obama Deception

    --
    ~ awaiting spiritual enlightenment ~
  146. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    More likely he'll pay EDS 98 squillion gazillion quid to mod it.

    After they've finished (with a 200% time and 300% budget overrun) it won't play DVDs from any region. But look on the bright side, it will make lovely toast.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  147. Re:The "Anti Slave Ship" is worth about a klan hoo by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    "So fucking what" to slavery -- versus "so fucking what" to battling slavery, but not necessarily for the most altruistic reasons? Are you seriously still trying to make those two things the same? Alcohol is the same as no-alcohol?

    The "repeat what they say in a different context oh snap" rebuttal only makes sense if the other context is related to the original in some way other than being it's opposite. In fact it only demonstrates how ridiculous your argument is.

    Your comparison of an anti-slave ship to a klan hood is retarded, wrong, and offensive in its stupidity. You have no business calling anyone an idiot, unless they agree with you in which case the statement is sufficiently justified.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  148. Reprehensible Morality by copponex · · Score: 1

    I can't stand this argument.

    If you're a white person that didn't grow up in an urban slum in the United States, you owe a hell of a lot to a bunch of dead slaves and their survivors who have been not allowed to create the generational wealth that you benefit from. The reason they were not allowed to create this wealth is because the business people who run the country found it useful to defuse thoughts on class with a focus on race.

    This kind of racism is still prevalent. When a young white person is kidnapped or killed, coverage can go on for years. When it's a non-white person, it's simply a statistic. When fomenting public support for killing Arabs, politicians can say, "Those people don't understand anything but violence," which is just as ridiculous as saying that Jews don't understand anything but money and Africans don't understand anything but poverty.

    If your society was enriched by the enslavement or destruction of another, you don't owe them something, you owe them everything. Not only due to the wealth that was robbed from them, but by the moral obligation to right a wrong. It's doubtful that any person could untangle the horrors societies have done to another, and come up with some dollar figure, but that still doesn't excuse your kind of attitude.

    1. Re:Reprehensible Morality by gknoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you're a white person that didn't grow up in an urban slum in the United States, you owe a hell of a lot to a bunch of dead slaves and their survivors who have been not allowed to create the generational wealth that you benefit from.

      May I ask what benefit I (and my ancestors) have derived from slaves, given that they were poor German, Polish, and Irish immigrants from the late 1800s? What generational wealth? While I feel that slavery was despicable, I do not feel that I have benefitted from it in any measurable way. I'm curious why you simply say "white people", also.

    2. Re:Reprehensible Morality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most African Americans in the US are better off than they would have been, had their grandparents not had to go through the inhumanity of slavery...

    3. Re:Reprehensible Morality by copponex · · Score: 1

      If a relative of yours gave you money for college, to start a business, or to get out of a debt, you have benefitted from generational wealth. Statistically speaking, for every dollar of assets belonging to a white person, a black person will have eight to twelve cents.

      When you have literally nowhere to turn when you're living paycheck to paycheck, you often get ensnared in high interest payday loans and credit cards, putting you deeper into debt, and at greater risk for bankruptcy. Something as simple as a back injury or a child being sick can lead to thousands of dollars of debt in lost pay. The lack of usury laws in America have created a nearly ten billion dollar industry which charges the equivalent of 400% APR interest for these types of loans. These immoral business practices not only damage the people who are given the loans, but the rest of society, as capital floods out of low return investments that create jobs into high-return investments that are unsustainable. In Adam Smith's day, the maximum rate you could charge was 5% - see below for a full quote.

      I say white people because if you look at the top rung of people who own the country through assets, they are overwhelmingly white, and that skew against any non-white person permeates down to the lowest income levels. From incarceration rates to interest rates to a lack of education, being black in America has a much heavier burden than anyone is ready to admit.

      In countries where interest is permitted, the law, in order to prevent the extortion of usury, generally fixes the highest rate which can be taken without incurring a penalty. This rate ought always to be somewhat above the lowest market price, or the price which is commonly paid for the use of money by those who can give the most undoubted security. If this legal rate should be fixed below the lowest market rate, the effects of this fixation must be nearly the same as those of total prohibition of interest. The creditor will not lend his money for less than the use of it is worth, and the debtor must pay him for the risk which he runs by accepting the full value of that use. If it is fixed precisely at the lowest market price, it ruins with honest people, who respect the laws of their country, the credit of all those who cannot give the very best security, and obliges them to have recourse to exorbitant usurers. In a country, such as Great Britain, where money is lent to government at three percent, and to private people upon good security at four, four and a half, the present legal rate, five per cent, is perhaps, as proper as any.

      Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations

      (emphasis mine)

    4. Re:Reprehensible Morality by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can't stand this argument.

      If you're a white person that didn't grow up in an urban slum in the United States, you owe a hell of a lot to a bunch of dead slaves and their survivors who have been not allowed to create the generational wealth that you benefit from.

      ...

      If your society was enriched by the enslavement or destruction of another, you don't owe them something, you owe them everything. Not only due to the wealth that was robbed from them, but by the moral obligation to right a wrong. It's doubtful that any person could untangle the horrors societies have done to another, and come up with some dollar figure, but that still doesn't excuse your kind of attitude.

      I don't particularly care what argument you can or can't stand - the basic fact of the matter is the people that actually need to be punished have been dead for generations. I do not want to be held accountable for their actions because I am not accountable for the actions of others, especial others that I have never met or had a chance to influence.

      If reparations had any basis or validity in law, why stop at slavery? Can I get reparations please for the generations of brutality and oppression my ancestors received at the hands of the English when they occupied Wales? How about the deaths of several of my ancestors at the hands of the Catholic Church - please hand over your cheque book Mr Pope, I think I'm owed money.

      Get real. Stop living in the past.

    5. Re:Reprehensible Morality by copponex · · Score: 1

      As I stated before, it's not an issue of money. But should we have Affirmative Action in the US? Absolutely. Should we loan Africa money at the same rates we loan money to Bank of America? Definitely. Not because someone came up with some figure, but because it's the right thing to do. Just as the Catholic Church should liquidate it's gold statues and property and feed the poor instead of standing around in palaces, pretending that they're Christ-like.

      Your attitude fails to recognize the realities of history. I know it's awfully convenient to be ignorant and say, "Stop living in the past," but knowing history is the only way to understand the present.

    6. Re:Reprehensible Morality by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Your attitude fails to recognize the realities of history. I know it's awfully convenient to be ignorant and say, "Stop living in the past," but knowing history is the only way to understand the present.

      Theres a world of difference between knowing history and being held accountable for historic actions.

      When we talk about reparations, we are not talking about carrying out affirmative action, or positive discrimination, or lending money at low rates.

      When reparation is demanded, its invariably monetary payoffs. Or in other words, compensation to people alive today for actions done to people alive hundreds of years ago. That, along with the demands for apologies for those same actions, is what I am against because it holds me responsible for actions carried out by people I have no connection to, or had an ability to influence.

    7. Re:Reprehensible Morality by meringuoid · · Score: 1

      What you are arguing for here is not reparations for slavery, and it is not affirmative action. What you are arguing for here is Communist revolution and the abolition of personal wealth.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    8. Re:Reprehensible Morality by copponex · · Score: 1

      No, I'm arguing for rules that ensure that a healthy democracy can flourish along with the efficiencies that certain market principles can bring.

      Outrageous interest rates, lawless capital markets, and investor rights and corporate rights that trump individual rights perform the same function as a non-democratic leftist revolution. That is to concentrate power away from the reach of the people.

      Wal-Mart has a good relationship with Communist China because they have so much in common.

    9. Re:Reprehensible Morality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't stand the statement, go fuck off, or better yet, take a flying leap off the tallest building/bridge near you.

      No one owes them a damn thing. Over 600,000 people died fighting over the issue and their blood is more than enough payment, especially those that live no where near where any slaves were owned. Descendants of slaves should be thankful for slavery, otherwise they would be in the cesspit that is Africa. They get to enjoy the advantages of living in advanced society, but do nothing but bitch and moan about their situation which is largely due to their own lack of self discipline and character. IMHO, we should be like the Japanese and start paying the unemployed to go fuck off and move back to the country they came from and make it cover the last 400 years.

  149. Re:The "Anti Slave Ship" is worth about a klan hoo by Tiber · · Score: 1

    "So fucking what" to slavery -- versus "so fucking what" to battling slavery, but not necessarily for the most altruistic reasons? Are you seriously still trying to make those two things the same? Alcohol is the same as no-alcohol?

    You're being intentionally intellectually dishonest. You know the correct analogy would be to say "I can't sell alcohol to you so I'm going to make sure no-one is buying alcohol anywhere else".

    The english did it by calling it debt bondage. War on terror, meet OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATION! See? If you change what you call something it makes it OK, right?

  150. Re:The "Anti Slave Ship" is worth about a klan hoo by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    You're being intentionally intellectually dishonest. You know the correct analogy would be to say "I can't sell alcohol to you so I'm going to make sure no-one is buying alcohol anywhere else".

    I do know that, and it's still not the same as alcohol! Anti-slavery is still not the same as slavery! War is in fact not Peace! Even if the Peace is rooted in selfishness!

    Intellectual dishonestly my ass.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  151. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 1

    I think that the Act of Settlement would disagree with your assertion that HMQ is not the most qualified person to be head of state.
    You also have to realise that head of state != head of government, and that there aren't really any merit-based qualification required for the former, except to not conduct yourself in a manner which makes your country look bad.

    --
    FGD 135
  152. Re: Obama and the Queen by cagrin · · Score: 1

    Ignorance and apathy are the two most dangerous diseases of our time, and very difficult to cure.

    --
    ~ awaiting spiritual enlightenment ~
  153. She's the frickn' Queen of England .... by taniwha · · Score: 1

    she's not amused - you don't give her an iPod - you need to give her a wiiPod ....

  154. Mr. Joe Cool by abbyful · · Score: 1

    Obama needs to quit trying to be "Mr. Joe Cool" and act like a President.

  155. Re:The "Anti Slave Ship" is worth about a klan hoo by Tiber · · Score: 1

    The only thing in your ass is Obama's manhood.

    Checkmate, the Indians invented chess you know. Might serve you to learn some history.

  156. Why is this a big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Listening to the news this morning it was stated that the Queen asked for the iPod so either ABC news is lying or this is a complete non-story.

  157. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by OMGcAPSLOCK · · Score: 4, Funny

    By all accounts the Queen is actually into gadgets. She even has a Wii.

    I assume that would be the "Royal Wii"?

  158. Oblig. by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    The Royal Fist Bump.

  159. Re:Maybe Japan's Prime Minister will get 20" rims! by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

    That most of this culture is available to anybody with $300 to spare is not an indictment of Obama's stinginess, nor of America's, but a celebration of our egalitarianism.

    And probably a result of the large number of former entertainment industry lawyers now in various positions within his administration.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  160. Slashdot xenophobia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As an example of the "torrent of criticism in the British press", Slashdot links to an U.S. paper. I'm sure there is a really good reason for that, like those pesky foreign papers using an incomprehensible foreign language, or something...

  161. This is the Main Difference.... by phatslaab · · Score: 1

    between new money and old money, higher education and classical education. Darn yankees...

  162. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by srussia · · Score: 1

    I assume that would be the "Royal Wii"?

    Why yes! I hear she even has one in the Royal Loo.

    --
    Set your phasers on "funky"!
  163. I'll have some of whatever you're having... by Animaether · · Score: 1

    The Region 1 DVDs - which are, well, DVDs... they're discs. With data.. video and audio and some other bits and pieces to define chapters, menu selections, etc. but data - require a television and a power converter?

    Presuming you meant the DVD player... wouldn't Brown -have- a player that works on the UK electric system?

    Presuming you meant that Obama *included* a DVD player... ever looked at the backs of those things to find the power specs? By and large, electronic devices are 110V/240V compatible out of the box. The only place I've not seen the compatibility out of the box recently was on an old computer (PS/2 keyboard/mouse, running Windows 98).. and even that had a switch on the PSU to toggle between the two voltages. It's just cheaper for manufacturers to buy the dual-voltage modules as those are pumped out by the bajillions vs the millions for voltage-specific ones and having to deal with including a different one in each package.
    At worst, he'd have to get a different *plug* for the machine. Those are $1.50 at your nearest Best Buy-style store. Even that may not be necessary, however; I just bought a Western Digital external drive.. it came with plugs for the EU and UK included.
    Personally I'm not fond of that as it's just waste (I'll end up tossing one of them), but there ya go.

    On to NTSC/PAL - you'd have to buy a pretty shitty DVD player if it doesn't know what to do with an 'NTSC' stream playing back to a PAL device, or vice versa. That's nothing special about the streams on the disc, btw.. those are just MPEG2 video data streams that match an NTSC or PAL spec (i.e. pixel dimensions, frame rate). The part of the DVD player that matters is the part that converts the dimensions and FPS to the proper output for the device you're displaying on, and that tends to be a menu option (NTSC/PAL/SECAM).
    But he certainly doesn't need an NTSC television.

  164. Re:Maybe Japan's Prime Minister will get 20" rims! by deets101 · · Score: 1

    Newsflash: All politicians and people that appear on TV use teleprompters... Deal with it; it's not news.

    I seem to remember a couple of years ago a story people tried to bring up about Bush in a press conference had a bulge in the back of his jacket and it was a device that allowed Rove to tell him what to say. If Bush relied on teleprompters as much as Obama does, he would have been raked over the coals for it. When Obama does it, it is a smart move on his part and not news.

    --

    --
    My parents went to Slashdot and all I got was this lousy sig.
  165. Tradition by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

    The gift exchange is an ancient custom where heads of states would exchange gift representative of their nations best cultural contributions (in short, "Why we are worth keeping around, plz don't invade us).

    So you are telling me that the best the US can come up with is an overpriced walkman and the best the English can come up with is a signed picture of an old woman? We are so FX$%*#^&#.

    In days past it might have been a Beatles album swapped for Buddy Holly album. Or Pink Floyd for Nirvana.
    In days past it might have been Jack Daniels for Crowley Ale
    In days past perhaps Doyle for Twain

    A )#($*%#)($% IPOD and a picture?!?!?! WTF!

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
  166. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by moosesocks · · Score: 1

    I'd like to mirror virtually all of those comments as an American. The British are extremely fortunate to have her as head of state, even if her role is largely symbolic.

    Members of the British royal family have historically (and still do) fulfill important civic and military duties for their country, with the most recent example of Prince Harry's service on the front lines in Afghanistan.

    How many Senators' children do you see anonymously signing themselves up for the war?

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  167. But it was a gift to the nation, not the prez. by EWAdams · · Score: 1

    It sits in the Oval Office and is used by all the presidents. It wasn't given to the man, but to the office.

    --
    I piss off bigots.
  168. You know what they say... by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You can take the Obamas out of the ghetto but you can't take the ghetto out of the Obamas. :P

    1. Re:You know what they say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I know a ton of people in the ghetto with signed Richard Rodgers songbooks.

  169. My God isn't everyone missing the point? by Ben+Newman · · Score: 1

    This is just the British press trying to stir things up and now that they have the "theme" of Obama being such a bad gift giver they're hoping to run with it. But look at the facts. They gave her an antique Rodgers and Hammerstein songbook that was signed by Rodgers; a very valuable antique, a great piece of American cultural history and supposedly Rodgers is one of the Queen's favorite composers. Then in addition they gave her an iPod Touch to replace her old iPod nano (which she supposedly enjoyed very much) filled with Rogers and Hammerstein songs and videos of her last trip to America. So we have a valuable piece of American history combined with an example of cutting edge American technology. How is this not a great, diplomatic, well thought out and appropriate gift? Of course the "story" the press is selling is that they gave the Queen something they sent an aide off to buy from the airport gift shop at the last minute. *sigh* This is going to become another "Al Gore invented the internet" meme isn't it?

  170. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    Old people never through anything out. If her iPod dies then she can use it as a soap dish or something.

  171. Re:Maybe Japan's Prime Minister will get 20" rims! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would he give her an Israeli made firearm?

  172. Hope I was clear it was great by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I meant to use the pen as an example of the perfect gift, it may have read like I thought the opposite... but I meant that to be the model of a thoughtful gift.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Hope I was clear it was great by jabithew · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was agreeing with you wholeheartedly.

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
  173. Re:The "Anti Slave Ship" is worth about a klan hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I liked the part where you called Obama a "chimp." Real classy stuff, right there.

  174. But that adds little value (to her) by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    It was an iPod with video and photos of her 2007 trip to the United States. How thoughtless.

    That helped, but honestly do you not think the Queen gets that stuff automatically from the press? If it were you or I, yes that gift would be more special because few people have time to gather that stuff. But the Queen has squadrons of people gathering media, and she can see video of herself any time I imagine... so in fact including that was something that seemed like a nice touch, but again was not really thinking through who the recipient was on a higher level.

    To me though, the main problem is still the fundamental aspect of giving a gift that at the core is an impermanent thing. How will that gift be in ten years? Honestly a smaller set of pictures in really nice frames would have been a better gift - more is not always better.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  175. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, you'ss see how "obsolete" we are when you finally break our financial backs and there will be no one left (me, the hardworking middle class) to pay your handouts anymore.

    "Honk if I'm paying your mortgage"

    Non-whites dominate the prison population and the food stamp population on a per capita basis.

    The only thing that you are going to revive is a race war with your disgusting attitude. And the sad thing of it is, is I hate the "American Jive Turkey Ebonix Homie" but have actually had amourous relationships with "minorities" , except you don't tend to call them that when one isn't in the USA.

    You're so blind with hate its you who has become the grabby racist.

  176. And more - himself by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Also meant to add, is it really appropriate to give someone pictures/video/audio of yourself as a gift?

    On the plus side, if the president of the US feels free to give away copies of songs to someone else, I guess it's OK for the rest of us.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:And more - himself by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Also meant to add, is it really appropriate to give someone pictures/video/audio of yourself as a gift?

      Um, did you read the part of the story where it mentions the gift Obama got from the Queen? The gift she gives to all guests?

  177. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't sound very Greek. Shouldn't it be something like Ethethetekebabopolis HummuousHummous?

  178. Top Men? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    on top of what, a privy cuntililgual lip from Her Majesty's Naval Acidemia?

  179. Re:It's not an iPod - besides... by Rei · · Score: 1

    She had a 2005 model, with no video. Also, apparently here staff had asked for the gift.

    --
    I guess I just let my urge to spawn soldiers for Satan's dark army get the better of me.
  180. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by XantheKnight · · Score: 1

    Her Majesty. Not Royal Highness. The latter is a title reserved for those in direct male line to the throne, not the incumbent. Prince William is Royal Highness. Charles is Royal Highness. The Queen is Majesty.

  181. Nixon - Kruschev gifts by herbertchapman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's a fairly apocryphal tale of Kruschev visiting the US, and taken to a trade fair extolling the virtue of free enterprise. President Nixon supposedly provided a gift of a model of a fully stocked all-American General Store of pioneer vintage, explaining that his parents were shopkeepers and how such stores were the bedrock of American values. Kruschev's reply : "All Shop keepers are thieves !" Can't help but admire his comeback, whatever your politics. Wonder what he gave Nixon ?

    1. Re:Nixon - Kruschev gifts by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1

      To which Nixon should have replied, "Perhaps, but at least they're aren't genocidal dictators"

  182. Re:Maybe Japan's Prime Minister will get 20" rims! by thefolkmetal · · Score: 1

    B.S., P.M. Brown presented Obama with a priceless, unique, and irreplaceable piece of the U.K.'s history. Obama gave him some DVDs. I doesn't matter how you try and justify that one, it's just disrespectful.

    Her Majesty's gift wasn't as commanding as the P.M.'s, but it's at very least more unique and not something you might expect to receive for having the highest number of sales at work. Perhaps the pictures vindicate it, but just barely.

  183. Does anyone else find this offensive by TomRC · · Score: 1

    I guess I'm over-sensitive - but I sort of found the Brown gift to Obama offensive.

    Not because it was racist or anything - but because it was sort of a gift that no one *except* someone very powerful in government would ever have a chance to have made just so they could give it as a gift.

    Do you think that *you* would be allowed to hack a chunk of wood off of the remains of a historical ship, to be carved into a pencil holder? It just reeks of the sort of thing a king might do - because who could deny him whatever he wants?

    Obama's gifts, on the other hand, were things any of us could have acquired or created. Maybe not terribly personal in the case of the DVDs (obviously something someone rushed to do at the last second), but better with the loaded iPod in that at least some thought and effort went into it - though perhaps still not quite "appropriate" given the recipient, but paired with the rare songbook, a reasonable gift.

    I think the Queen has the right idea - give out a standard gift, appreciated by most, not too tacky.

  184. It was a slap by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Because a silver framed, autographed picture of herself is such a thoughtful gift and not a condescending exercise in superiority.

    As noted, she gives them to everyone.

    Which basically means it was retaliation for the box-store Region 1 DVD set.

    So basically you are exactly correct, only missing the point that Obama currently deserves nothing better in the way of state gifts and in fact the point of superiority would seem to be accurate.

    Next time he comes I'll bet he gets a magnet from the gift store.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:It was a slap by Coward+Anonymous · · Score: 1

      "As noted, she gives them to everyone."
      By your own admission then. She gives them to everyone. There is no thought. Yet somehow, you manage to believe it's Obama's fault. You appear to be experiencing cognitive dissonance.

  185. Retaliation by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Well he'd already given her government a "thoughtful" dvd set they couldn't even play, when in return they had given him a monumentally meaningful pen set carved from a slave fighting ship of old.

    It's like people who never send you christmas cards or give you really cheap gifts, eventually you get the message they don't deserve anything special themselves. And in fact her gift was justified by what he brought.

    Thus, hundreds of years of tradition comes to an end. Thanks man.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  186. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

    I doubt its largely "just" symbolic. Remember, her majesty has a weekly meeting with the prime minister, and from all accounts, this is hardly a cup of tea, as many people think. Its VERY businesslike, and although we will never find out what she exactly says to the prime minister, it is known she has spoken very strongly against some, regarding her concerns.

    The best part is, she doesnt act as a dictator, she properly follows rules and procedures which got her into hot water too (just after Diana's death, a period which I personally think she handled well, but the media hyped a hysteria beyond anything)

    She is far more of a credit to this country than some of our governments. For example during 9/11, she quickly requested that the american anthem be played during the Changing of the Guard a few days later. Sounds simple? Not quite, firstly its totally unprecedented. And the logistics in training and inviting people, considering she herself was not in London during the time. It was a powerful and tear jerking event to show solidarity with America, and was repeated later after the madrid bombing, with the spanish anthem.

    Compare that to our shameful government who's PR people decided to use 9/11 to announce some "bad government reports" in the hope that with the nation's mind being occupied with the events in New York that these news would not be noticed. That failed, and they got blasted for that.

    --
    Have a nice day!
  187. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by moosesocks · · Score: 1

    Absolutely! One of the things I find most fascinating is that the Queen's political leanings are almost completely unknown to the public.

    Given the amount of media attention that the royal family receive, this is outright remarkable, considering that it is well-known that the Queen does take an active interest in the operation of her government (via her weekly meetings with the PM, etc)

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  188. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cookbooks say something about a nationality, a culture or a person. How about "101 ways to fry chicken" and "favorite watermelon recipies vol 2".

  189. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Rumpour has it Brown was hoping for a Jade Goody realdoll.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  190. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by BakaHoushi · · Score: 1

    Not to say that I agree or disagree with the modding, but I think it's because the way you worded it made it sound as if Obama actually meant some sort of slight against the crippled/retarded (I refuse to use the term "differently abled. There is nothing wrong with either of those words.) when, given the context, it's most likely that he merely chose his words poorly.

    And for the record, as much as I despised our previous president, it's not as if you could bad-mouth HIM here, either, without mods hitting you and posters starting up flamewars.

  191. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hear, hear!

  192. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the new updated ipod with photos that are meaningful to her is a perfect gift. Besides, the publicity has been good for my apple stock.

  193. /. ers by Swift2001 · · Score: 1

    I've reached a conclusion about the majority of posters here. You know how to run a linux box, you know how to write some kind of code, no doubt, but generally speaking you're just as stupid as the rest of the world. You can't read, you don't have much insight into the world, and you're just as likely to fall for a silly British tabloid -- their serious press is better than ours, but their tabloids are even worse and more degraded -- and you're just as likely to spout the politics of 9-year-olds as any shmuck on the loading dock.

  194. Re: Obama and the Queen by Swift2001 · · Score: 1

    And much in evidence here on slashdot.

  195. Re:Maybe Japan's Prime Minister will get 20" rims! by fm6 · · Score: 1

    Brown presented Obama with a priceless, unique, and irreplaceable piece of the U.K.'s history.

    Good grief. It was a pen. OK, it was made from historic ships timber. That makes it valuable to some collector I suppose, and the connection to African-American history showed more thought than a pile of DVDs (Region 1 DVDs, no less!). But don't exaggerate.

  196. Re:Maybe Japan's Prime Minister will get 20" rims! by thefolkmetal · · Score: 1

    Nice sig. Care to tell me how I'm exaggerating? Why don't you try and get your hands on one of those pens, in the meantime, I'll get 25 DVDs. We'll see who wins out in the end.

  197. Re:Maybe Japan's Prime Minister will get 20" rims! by fm6 · · Score: 1

    The pen was certainly more valuable than a pile of DVDs, but "priceless, unique, and irreplaceable part of history" is an exaggeration.

    I think most people are just a little tired of the constant babble from Obama haters. Yeah, he has a certain capacity for social blunders (this business with the DVDs, remarks about Nancy Reagan and the Special Olympics) and yes, I'm less than happy with some of his policies. But all in all he's doing a decent job. Sloppy gift buying aside, that overseas trip went pretty well, with Obama deftly handling a near meltdown at the G20 and doing a lot to undo Bush's unilateral blundering all over Europe.

    Mind you, I'm not saying you should shut up. I'd even say you have a responsibilty, as a dissenter, to be vocal about your dissent. That's how democracy works. But if you want to have a real effect, start talking about serious policies that you don't like. Things like DVDs and lipstick are trivial distractions; people are sick of hearing about them.

  198. Re:Maybe Japan's Prime Minister will get 20" rims! by thefolkmetal · · Score: 1

    I am well versed enough on his policies to carry a lengthy conversation. If I don't know about it, I will look it up. In this particular case, the topic happens to be the iPod he presented Her Majesty, and I saw it as an opportune moment to interject about the precursor to this when he presented Prime Minister Brown with the DVDs.

    How you think that the pen is not priceless, unique, and an irreplaceable piece of history is beyond me. It only takes a few moments of googling to discover that it's overrun with symbolism, and is not a trivial gift. I refuse to elaborate this matter for you, though, because I get the sense that it's lost on you. If you're so inclined, look it up, elsewise, you should refrain from commenting on subjects you've little familiarity with.

    I have yet to babble on with Obama hating. I have no interest in creating dissent for the hell of it. I'm much more interested in stirring awareness than I am in stirring hatred. For example, that last thread that you found me in: Your post was useless, unless you're interested in the status quo. I couldn't care less who has and who hasn't read what laws. My concern is that these people are writing, amending, and passing laws. I expect every single bill that passes to be read and thoroughly understood. If they are not, then these politicians are not worth the salaries we pay them.

    Also, when did I say anything about lipstick? Don't generalize with me. I'm not responsible for any words but my own.

  199. Re:Maybe Japan's Prime Minister will get 20" rims! by fm6 · · Score: 1

    I am well versed enough on his policies to carry a lengthy conversation.

    Anybody can do a "lengthy" conversation. I guess you meant to say "substantial". I'll believe you can do that when you start doing it.

    How you think that the pen is not priceless, unique, and an irreplaceable piece of history is beyond me. It only takes a few moments of googling to discover that it's overrun with symbolism...

    Don't patronize. Everybody who's heard about the pen knows its backstory symbolism. The fact remains that words like "priceless" and "historic" are hype. The HMS Resolute itself was a priceless historic artifact. Some important thing from the Resolute (the Captain's sextant perhaps) would also be a priceless historic artifact. But if you break up the Resolute, you don't have a PHA any more, you have a pile of lumber. If you make souvenirs out of that lumber, they may be full of interesting historical context, and they might make an appropriate gift for the first U.S. President of African heritage (though I do wonder if black people value souvenirs of the Middle Passage). But that's it.

    ...and is not a trivial gift.

    Where did I say the gift was trivial? There are many gradations between "trivial" and "priceless". If I used the word, it was in reference to your arguments.

    I refuse to elaborate this matter...

    No, you just want to hit me over the head with it.

    I expect every single bill that passes to be read and thoroughly understood.

    Great. Next time you meet somebody who's running for office, tell them you won't vote for them unless they promise to carefully read every document they sign or vote for. Get back to me with a list of those that solidly endorse the idea. I suspect it won't be a long one.

  200. Re:Maybe Japan's Prime Minister will get 20" rims! by thefolkmetal · · Score: 1

    Substantial? Maybe if I was referring to substance. No, I meant I could converse back and forth for quite some length of time.

    I patronize you because you said "Good grief, it was a pen", which, by which you downplay it's significance except to some collector. I do see that you've taken a little time to look some stuff up about it since your last response, but you still downplay it. In that, I take you for a imbecile, due to the fact that you still acquaint a significant gift to a pile of DVDs. I suspect that makes you quite bad at giving thoughtful gifts.

    My last paragraph points to when you suggested it was trivial.

    The thought has occurred to me.

    Alright, I'll cede that point to you. I can't make list of said politicians. I'd be hard pressed to find 5. Though, at least I have a standard that I hold my elected officials to. You seem perfectly satisfied with the status quo of our government, since you care less about what was done, and more about who did it.