Slashdot Mirror


Poor Design Choices In the Star Wars Universe

Ant writes "John Scalzi's AMC blog shows a short guide to the most epic FAILs in Star Wars design — 'I'll come right out and say it: Star Wars has a badly-designed universe; so poorly-designed, in fact, that one can say that a significant goal of all those Star Wars novels is to rationalize and mitigate the bad design choices of the movies. Need examples? Here's ten ...'"

832 comments

  1. At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    R2-D2
    Sure, he's cute, but the flaws in his design are obvious the first time he approaches anything but the shallowest of stairs. Also: He has jets, a periscope, a taser and oil canisters to make enforcer droids fall about in slapsticky fashion -- and no voice synthesizer. Imagine that design conversation: "Yes, we can afford slapstick oil and tasers, but we'll never get a 30-cent voice chip past accounting. That's just madness."

    I believe his primary function is a flight droid so they were built to interface with ships. Not a lot else. John Scalzi seems to suffer from the "must have everything" school of thought and doesn't think the future will focus on minimalism and getting one thing right. Thank god he's not writing software and just another hot air blogger. I reject Episodes I, II & III so I don't know what he's talking about with the oil slick and jets.

    C-3PO
    Can't fully extend his arms; has a bunch of exposed wiring in his abs; walks and runs as if he has the droid equivalent of arthritis. And you say, well, he was put together by an eight-year-old. Yes, but a trip to the nearest Radio Shack would fix that. Also, I'm still waiting to hear the rationale for making a protocol droid a shrieking coward, aside from George Lucas rummaging through a box of offensive stereotypes (which he'd later return to while building Jar-Jar Binks) and picking out the "mincing gay man" module.

    Again, you're overlooking his primary function. C-3PO is a protocol droid designed to serve humans, and boasts that he is fluent "in over six million forms of communication." So he's got arthritis, well, you didn't build him to be flexible or fight. You built him to look pretty and translate. Everything else is bells and whistles. I think he was meant to stand in a corner for some rich merchant or politician and translate any language imaginable. Are you going to tell me that my car is flawed because I couldn't afford a $20 toaster to put in the dash?

    Death Star
    An unshielded exhaust port leading directly to the central reactor? Really? And when you rebuild it, your solution to this problem is four paths into the central core so large that you can literally fly a spaceship through them? Brilliant. Note to the Emperor: Someone on your Death Star design staff is in the pay of Rebel forces. Oh, right, you can't get the memo because someone threw you down a huge exposed shaft in your Death Star throne room.

    Uh, the second Death Star was never completed, you idiot. The rebels learned about it and attacked it before it had everything completed so anything like "four paths to the central core" or "exposed shafts" could well have been necessary during its construction. Haven't you seen Clerks or watched Robot Chicken's parody of Palpatine trying to talk to the foreman?

    But Luke's X-34 speeder on Tatooine? The Yugo of speeders, man. One hard stop, and out you go.

    He's a farmer. You should have seen the "vehicles" and ATVs I drove while working on farms. One was a modified bus with huge water tanks on the back and an upside down bucket for a seat. They make a Yugo look like a dream car. Are you going to complain about the blast marks and carbon scoring adorning the rag tag rebel ships next?

    So easy to rip apart. And you know, he doesn't offer anything constructive. Like the asteroid worm. He would have enjoyed it more if space in the Star Wars galaxy was like our space? Dead, uninhabited and void? George Lucas isn't a god but he sure thought up some neat ideas for a universe that John Scalzi will never come close to.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Red4man · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hell hath no fury like a fanboi's scorn.

      --
      Sock Puppets: damn_registrars=pudge_confirmer=jimmy_slimmy=raiigunner=cml4524=a_klavan=red4men=ronpaulisanidiot
    2. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by vertinox · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I see you didn't defend the Storm Trooper armor...

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    3. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Dude, you've got too much time on your hands ;)

      I rather liked the attitude that JMS had about this kind of stuff. One time a fan asked him "How fast do starfuries go?" and his response was "They move at the speed of plot"

      If the plot makes sense and the universe remains consistent about it's own rules then who cares how functional RD2D would be in our universe or how badly designed the weapons of Star Trek are?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    4. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Clearly you never met a girl.

                          --Hate from Satan in Hell.

    5. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Like the asteroid worm.

      Actually, I agree with him on the asteroid worm, what does it eat? Obviously it can't count on spaceships for breakfast ("you aren't actually flying INTO and asteroid field?!?") so what does that leave, asteroids? yummy.

      The Sarlak (at least in the old version of the movies) is plausible in the fact that it didn't move much so its energy reqs would be minimal, and it did have a decent sand trap to force stupid creatures in. How it mates or even creates/maintains that sand trap is a bit of a mystery.

    6. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Abreu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Also, you have to give credit to the fact that a lot of the things that are "obvious" for us were not necesarily so for someone in the seventies.

      Like the fact that Luke drives a fast convertible without any seatbelts or rollbars (unthinkable now, but common then)

      Also, some depictions of minorities are considered offensive now, but were ok in the seventies and eighties (nevertheless, that's no excuse for Jar-Jar)

      In any case, the original article writer needs to repeat MST3K's Mantra, until he feels better...

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    7. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Red4man · · Score: 4, Funny

      Women aren't nearly as obsessive as Fanbois. Ever seen Fatal Attraction? Nothing compared to a fanboi.

      --
      Sock Puppets: damn_registrars=pudge_confirmer=jimmy_slimmy=raiigunner=cml4524=a_klavan=red4men=ronpaulisanidiot
    8. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "John Scalzi seems to suffer from the "must have everything" school of thought and doesn't think the future will focus on minimalism and getting one thing right."
      Since when do these movies start out "A LONG TIME FROM NOW...."

    9. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I see you didn't defend the Storm Trooper armor...

      Oh, well, I'm not stupid. Tons of things in the SW universe make absolutely no sense. The storm trooper uniforms are stupid, kind of remind me of French Legionnaire uniforms that always made me laugh when I saw someone dressed like that in the desert. The red flags on your shoulders make you stick out like a sore thumb regardless of where you are.

      So there's something that actually existed much like the storm trooper armor. Somethings are meant to intimidate rather than camouflage, perhaps the storm trooper armor is there to let you know that you don't stand a chance? To be distinctive? It's a stretch but it's stupid. Looked really badass when I was a kid though.

      A lot of these arguments apply to many sci-fi/fantasy works, not just SW so why waste your time on the critical analysis. Are you bettering society? Congratulations, you just tore apart something that was made over three decades ago.

      He should have stuck to the physical aspects of the universe like noise in space and being able to see laser shots from the side ... oh, that's right, we've been over this before on Slashdot, with our friends, in popular mechanics, everywhere. My grandfather commented on the "wings" of ships that seemed to spend all their time in space.

      --
      My work here is dung.
    10. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by LaRoach · · Score: 1

      Which is worse? They guy (presumably) getting paid to write about Star Wars on a movie blog or the guy defending Star Wars on Slashdot? Whatever you do, don't read Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex!

    11. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I see you didn't defend the Storm Trooper armor...

      The armor is easier to defend than their marksmanship ;)

      Here we have the pride of the Empire. A professional solider who was cloned from stock hand selected to be the most effective killing machine possible. He spends every waking minute either training for battle or fighting in one. There's Han Solo, less than ten meters away. Avowed enemy of the empire. Working with the terrorist Luke Skywalker to try and overthrow the Emperor. He's ours now! The Stormtrooper raises his blaster to his shoulder, aims, fires....... and misses!

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    12. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Khashishi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Storm Trooper armor is riot gear. It's for protecting against rocks and small arms while they beat down demonstrators. Most non-smugglers won't have access to a blaster capable of blowing through one. Presumably, a gunpowder rifle wouldn't penetrate the armor, which is why the characters use loud and slow firing blasters.

    13. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by SOdhner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are you bettering society?

      Are you? Relax, it's just a funny article pointing out some absurd stuff from a popular series. That's it. It doesn't need to solve world hunger.

      He should have stuck to the physical aspects of the universe like noise in space and being able to see laser shots from the side

      Because that would TOTALLY better society. Good call.

    14. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It takes many poor choices of men before a woman decides to hate all men. A fanboi just needs one person outside his/her (well, okay, his) fandom to convince him to hate all people — man, woman, or child, living, dead, or imaginary — outside said fandom.

      I'm not taking my chances with the fanbois.

    15. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      ... It's for protecting against rocks ...

      That sure helped them against the ewoks.

    16. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by agentgonzo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I see the Sarlac as something akin to the venus fly trap. In fact, comparing the Sarlac to a venus-fly-trap makes this blog sound laughable: "A monstrous yet immobile plant that lives in an exposed pit ..., waiting for animals to apparently feel suicidal and trek out to throw themselves in? Yeah, not so much. Not every Sarlaac can count on an army of ants to feed it tidbits." And before everyone replies with "well the Venus fly trap has sugary treats or whatever to attract prey", how do we know that the Sarlac doesn't have something similar and Jabba's just flinging people in as a humourous way to dispose of his enemies?

    17. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by TWX · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think that the entire point of the stormtrooper uniform is to emphasize the mechanistic, monolithic nature of stormtroopers. It also makes sense in the context of stormtroopers all being clones.

      If anything, it's masterful in the sense that if you kill them you don't see biological signs of having done so. They come at you like a horde and shooting one down only means that the next one in line is right there.

      Remember, in the Star Wars universe, the people pretty much willingly gave themselves over to Palpatine. After the sham clone wars, the stormtroopers are a reminder of the government, a control, a deterrent. Their effectiveness as one's vanguard is shown to be mixed at best, with officers doing the decision making and fighting (in the mech walking units, on ships, etc), so they exist to remind the populace of the overarching presence of the empire, not to necessarily actually do a good job enforcing it when push comes to shove.

      I have my other problems with the Star Wars universe, mind you, and I'm definitely no rabid fan, but it's an amusing series to watch if you ignore the recent three movies.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    18. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as for his critique of the storm troopers there are many different types although most are not seen in the movies. but sometimes you just want to make an intimidating statement something that large groups of gleaming white troops can do. their armor could have been better yes but for the most part I think they would be used to stop small arms fire from ragged disorganized rebels. Remember from the star wars 3 they only really had to fight the jedi. oh those Midi-Chlorians maybe how you use them is just as important to having them. and finally those creatures he has a problem with might have really low metabolisms, it is amazing how much energy you can spend chasing your next meal.

    19. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by navygeek · · Score: 1

      The worm called for takeout. Haven't you seen Robot Chicken?

    20. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by hardburn · · Score: 1

      Agreed, a lot of this just seems silly and nitpicky. He doesn't even bring out the really big ones, like measuring speed in parsecs, the complete lack of railings around giant drops, and how "R2D2" and "C3PO" are too short to be unique identifiers in a huge, galaxy-wide society with lots of droids around.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    21. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by IorDMUX · · Score: 1
      Good points, eldavojohn. Here are a few more thoughts regarding Stormtrooper armor and Blasters:

      First off, blaster != laser gun. The official materials state how a blaster is supposed to be shooting some sort of highly energized packet of Tibanna Gas sealed in a way to deliver its explosive energies to a target. So yes, it is a projectile weapon, not a pulsed laser beam.

      Why use blasters, then? First off, the blaster bolt is much more damaging than a standard projectile of equivalent mass, while having far less kickback than a rifle with similar destructive powers. Also, Stormtrooper armor can easily stop your average bullet! Got that? That is also one of the reasons for Stormtrooper armor. Also, the armor itself is seen to often be impenetrable to blaster bolts. There are plenty of instances in the movies when you can see a shot 'wing' a Stormtrooper or simply impact on the chest plate without disabling the Stormtrooper. A large number of the disabling shots in the movies actually hit joints in the armor (either the heroes are guided by the Force, or just sick-lucky).

      Midi-Chlorians?

      ...These aren't the droids you're looking for.

      --
      >> Standing on head makes smile of frown, but rest of face also upside down.
    22. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by commodore64_love · · Score: 3, Interesting

      True, true. For example *this* fanboy can't stand Science stories that have no science. Like Star Wars. It's really just a classic medieval knights-and-dragons-and-ladies fairy tale.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    23. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by agentgonzo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Storm Trooper armor is riot gear. It's for protecting against rocks and small arms while they beat down demonstrators.

      You mean like those Ewoks that they thoroughly quashed on the moon of Endor?

    24. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by CannonballHead · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Are you bettering society? I think so. Kids learn a lot from TV. Why should they not be instructed that you don't need wings in space? You can't hear sound in space? Light goes much faster? Etc.

      On slashdot, of all places, I would have thought debunking scientific fiction that is not at all "scientific" or even "logical"/"good thinking" would be encouraged :)

    25. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by AndrewNeo · · Score: 2

      The clone troopers (Ep. 2 and 3) were clones, the storm troopers (Ep. 4, 5, and 6) were not.

    26. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      I believe his primary function is a flight droid so they were built to interface with ships. Not a lot else. John Scalzi seems to suffer from the "must have everything" school of thought and doesn't think the future will focus on minimalism and getting one thing right. Thank god he's not writing software and just another hot air blogger. I reject Episodes I, II & III so I don't know what he's talking about with the oil slick and jets.

      Nice try, except that he DOES communicate with Luke, constantly, and apparently ALL astro-mechs communicate with their pilots audibly.

      In this case, there is absolutely no reason NOT to design them with a voice chip other than to screw with your customers. Same with the wheels, why not tracks? It doesn't make any difference for interfacing with the ship, since they have to make allowances for the arms and wheels that stick out on three sides of the 'bot already. I like R2-D2, but a third grader could come up with a better design.

      Again, you're overlooking his primary function. C-3PO is a protocol droid designed to serve humans, and boasts that he is fluent "in over six million forms of communication." So he's got arthritis, well, you didn't build him to be flexible or fight. You built him to look pretty and translate. Everything else is bells and whistles. I think he was meant to stand in a corner for some rich merchant or politician and translate any language imaginable. Are you going to tell me that my car is flawed because I couldn't afford a $20 toaster to put in the dash?

      Again, you're purposely overlooking terrible design. He is a communications droid that cannot do sign language and does not understand body language, nor communicate good body language. Body language is 90% of all communciation - a good protocol droid would be more like a stuffy assistant with excellent body language and fluent in 6 million languages - including sign language. There is no reason for him not to have human level or nearly human level range of motion. The technology required to make him stand on two legs and stay on two legs is vastly more complicated than allowing his arms to move around.

      Uh, the second Death Star was never completed, you idiot. The rebels learned about it and attacked it before it had everything completed so anything like "four paths to the central core" or "exposed shafts" could well have been necessary during its construction. Haven't you seen Clerks or watched Robot Chicken's parody of Palpatine trying to talk to the foreman?

      Why were there four paths to the central core? Why did they need to lead to the central core? When building a building, it's not necessary that the back door be a straight shot to the generator. In fact, common sense tells you that something vulnerable to attack should be well hidden and protected, and not have its sole protection be a shield generated on another planet. In real life, the first Death Star would have had a bend somewhere in the shaft, taking the chances of blowing the entire station up with a shot down an exhaust pipe from a million to one down to zero. For the Second, they would have put friggin doors (you know, like in the docking bay?) up if they needed ship access (dunno why they would, they have ship access elsewhere and one assumes they would design a way to get heavy equipment down there). The four huge tunnels were far more than they needed for exhaust.

      He's a farmer. You should have seen the "vehicles" and ATVs I drove while working on farms. One was a modified bus with huge water tanks on the back and an upside down bucket for a seat. They make a Yugo look like a dream car. Are you going to complain about the blast marks and carbon scoring adorning the rag tag rebel ships next?

      That was his car, not an ATV. It was designed for passenger carry, as can obviously be seen, and it was unmodified. He even complains about how un-popular it is since the new models

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    27. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Dude, you've got too much time on your hands ;)

      I rather liked the attitude that JMS had about this kind of stuff. One time a fan asked him "How fast do starfuries go?" and his response was "They move at the speed of plot"

      If the plot makes sense and the universe remains consistent about it's own rules then who cares how functional RD2D would be in our universe or how badly designed the weapons of Star Trek are?

      Part of proper world-building is making it make sense. I appreciate it when an artist goes about creating a mythical fantasy beast and puts effort into figuring out the biomechanics. I laugh when I see something like a four-armed giant depicted where he's drawn with a bog-standard human chest and the second set of arms is just shoved in a foot down from the first. No, a four-armed giant would have a chest a whole lot different from ours!

      If you design a fantasy spaceship, figure out what the parts are for! Yes, it's all make-believe, but you end up with a stronger design if you can justify what you're slapping on the model. I had this argument with a designer on a project, he wanted to have all the clips on the guns curving backwards instead of forwards, just to be different. I asked him if he even knew why clips curved forward in the real world. He wasn't sure. I told him it was because bullets are slightly conic and if you stack them they would naturally curve. You don't really see that in handgun cartridges but it makes a difference for the kind you put in assault rifles. He finally conceded to reason there and the weapons looked more sensible as a result.

      So, as for the guy's comments in order:

      R2D2: yeah, it seems like he should have a voice chip, he could speak in text through the X-Wing's computer as we saw in Empire. But everyone seems to understand him just fine, Han understands Chewie just fine, so it's not an issue. R2D2 is like the Lassie of droids.

      C3P0: The reason why he walks like he's got a rod up his ass is because it's a complicated, uncomfortable costume. I promise you he wouldn't walk like that if he were CGI.

      Lightsaber: They're incredible dangerous weapons to begin with and you need to be a Jedi to use them. I don't think the Jedi even need handguards.

      Blasters: it's all part of the scifi schtick. Given the tech level of star wars, a conventional gun would be just as likely to give you away. Today we've got special microphones and radar that can tell the secret service exactly where a gunshot came from. In 20 years, I would not be surprised if this tech was available in helmets and onboard displays could give an augmented reality flag to where the shooter came from. A blaster would be just as subtle.

      Landspeeder: Are you serious? Rednecks drive their pickups without seatbelts all the time. I don't see belts on quadrunners. It would be more appropriate to ask about the lack of five-point restraints at the crewstations on Federation starships and why the consoles all carry safety grenades that explode in combat.

      Death Star: Yeah, the unshielded reactor on the first one was dumb. Lucas wanted to steal the bombing sequence from the Dam Busters and needed a plausible reason to recreate that. This necessitated a starship as big as a moon to provide the landscape, a trench to fly down to be like the first movie and some suitable target at the end that could blow the whole thing up. There was historical precedent for something like this with the Bismarck where obsolete biplanes managed to land a single torpedo at the only point on the ship where they could do damage, the rudder. Didn't sink the Bismarck but rendered it lame and set the stage for the final surface battle which sunk her.

      Stormtrooper outfits: Yeah, poor visibility in the helmets is a problem. Lucas wanted these guys to all be covered up and not visibly human because it removed the human association with violence. The troopers could just as easily have been Cylons in that getup. But you'd think the helmets would have

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    28. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by ArsonSmith · · Score: 5, Interesting
      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    29. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by eln · · Score: 5, Insightful

      C-3PO is a protocol droid designed to serve humans, and boasts that he is fluent "in over six million forms of communication."

      3PO is there for comic relief primarily, so his cowardice doesn't bother me. What really bothered me about him is the origin story in Episode 1. I mean seriously, are you trying to tell me that an 8 year old, bored out of his mind on a desert planet, with access to enough parts and knowledge to build a basically sentient robot is going to build a PROTOCOL DROID? I mean, he could have built a mindless killing machine, or a machine capable of fixing his speeder for him, or stealing shit from the marketplace, or raiding moisture farms for water, or SOMETHING. But no, he builds a droid designed to communicate politely in 6 million languages and that's about it. What the hell does a kid whose primary interest is podracing need with a protocol droid that can speak 6,000,000 languages, 5,999,999 of which he can't understand, and 5,999,983 of which he's unlikely to ever need to know? This kid had to be the biggest dork in 3 galaxies.

    30. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Except the R2 units are always dealing with people outside the ship.

      C3 units are poorly designed, like putting oval tires on a car just because you won't drive far.
      The era he is from that were mass producing more mobile units. Why wouldn't you just put the tranlation innards into a product you are mass producing.
      That said, Anakin put him together, so maybe it's a child's building robot. heh.

      Ummm.. the Emperor KNEW the Rebellion was going to attack "...Fully functional Death Star" it IS a poor designed, and to repeat it is stupid.
      On a side not, you vitrol towards someone who is making a tongue in cheek article about a fictional unverse is really not warranted.
      Get a grip.

      No farm equipment I have ever seen had a jet engine and traveled at 330 km/h

      the asteroid sock puppet was lame as hell. I could have over looked have a creature where there is no food if it didn't look like a sock puppet...and have a big opening into space, yet no effective on the people walking around. Add to that the asteroid would have need to be incredible dense.
      The drama of that seen is good, but it could ahve been something different. It could ahve just as easily been an automated mining facility gone mad.

      None of your rebuttals make any sense. Blatant fan boy knee jerk reaction.
      I love star wars, I was one of the fanacts that saw it over 100 time while in it's first theatrical release. It changed my views, and will be a very fond memory. I liked all the movies. The last three released had issues, but not as many as wanna-be fan boys portray.

      So, how do you excuse away the fact that there are almost no rails overlook huge falls?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    31. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by j-stroy · · Score: 1

      Stormtroopers: are all clones who are weak minded to make them compliant. The armour is to stop them from going crazy seeing themselves everywhere by de-referencing their appearance.. (Think malkewich malkewich malkewich)

      R2: Is a purely functional robot that follows commands, akin to a universal keyboard, you'd go nuts if your keyboard talked to you all the time.

      C3P0: A mild manner doesn't intimidate. Primary function is to communicate.

      Blasters: an exothermic chemical reaction produces the power to throw a plasma charge.. think "ball lightning". The light is a side effect. It is not a "light" weapon.

      The Asteroid Worm must eat rock, So I'm thinking it survives on metals, and radioactive ores, ships just look like a spicy sandwich. They travel from asteroid to asteroid by blowing dust at high speeds out their tail.

      I got the idea that midi-chlorians were a sentient species, similar to the mitochondria in an Ursula LeQuinn series. Its not just the population, but also their intent. They gather to attempt a goal.

      My reasons are all made up, but so is the universe, get me some more cereal please?

    32. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Desler · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Did someone never watch Return of the Jedi? They were knocked over by small twigs and tiny stones with that armor on.

    33. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by commodore64_love · · Score: 5, Interesting

      >>>why waste your time on the critical analysis. Are you bettering society?

      Yes. Whenever you point-out, "This could never happen," you improve the general education levels. The American public is already woefully-stupid when it comes to science, so any article that tries to improve knowledge is a good thing. For example - No sounds do not exist in space, even though many think it does. I like one of the comments below the article:

      But a "city planet"? Coruscant is the center, capital and most populous planet, we're told. So either there exist vast factories pumping out nitrogen and oxygen, or its life thrives on a hearty stew of carbon dioxide, ozone and heavy metals.

      George Lucas stole that idea from Isaac Asimov who created the center of his Galactic Empire as a citywide planet (circa 1935). As Asmiov explained the planet was originally a farming planet just like any other, but as the 20,000 years of the empire's existence continued, it was paved-over with steel and buildings and bureaucracy.

      In order to survive, the "cityplanet" relied on imports to bring-in food and water, and also exports to remove waste. Much like how our modern New York City survives. After Asimov's Galactic Empire fell, the ~50 billion people who lived on the center planet literally starved to death, and those who survived removed the steel, crushed the bones for fertilizer, and reverted back to subsistence-level farming.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    34. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      Just pointing out that Storm Troopers weren't clones. Clone Troopers were clones, and there was only the one giant batch of them used in the clone wars, and since they were fighting on the "good" side most of the time, they had excellent aim. Storm troopers were recruited, apparently given shitty ass training, and called "the pride of the Empire" even though none of them could hit the broad side of a barn.

      The real reason they couldn't aim was not because of their training, it was because they were "bad guys". Faceless bad guys are not allowed to kill protagonists, no matter how rediculously easy it should be at the time.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    35. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by mrdoogee · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I always thought it was as much an intimidation tool as actual armor. Kind of like a Samurai Mask. A sea of white "monster faced" troops running at you would be pretty intimidating. Well, intimidating until they start shooting and it becomes obvious that there is no marksmanship taught at the Imperial Academy.

    36. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by NonUniqueNickname · · Score: 1

      The blaster is a clumsy and random weapon for an uncivilized age. Impossible to get good at it, no matter how much you train. Solo just got lucky, and of course had the advantage of shooting first.

    37. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes me laugh is that some American kid thinks the French Legion goes to battle, in the desert, wearing their parade uniforms...

    38. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would drive the shit out of that x-34 speeder, do you know what kinda chicks you can get with that? Green chicks, thats what kind.

    39. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If I remember correctly Asimov even went into figuring out how much it would take to keep a planet-city like that running - it was rediculous amounts of imports and exports on a daily basis just to keep things from falling apart.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    40. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Who cares? People who know that Jupiter does not have a minus 500 degree Celsius temperature (as JMS claimed in one of the episodes). Not only is that not true, but it's physically impossible for anything to be that cold. Babylon 5's a great show, and in my opinion the best science story ever produced for television, but there's still no excuse for bad science.

      Bad science like that "jolts" me out of the story and takes-away the realism, just as surely as if I was watching 24 and Jack Bauer started to cast fireballs.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    41. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That complaint always bugged me. I know of 4 occasions in Episode IV (I won't get into the other episodes) where the stormtroopers fire at the heroes.

      1. 3P0/R2 wander across the field of fire - Troopers shoot past them to get the actual targets (exactly as you would expect from trained marksmen)
      2. Falcon takes off - Troopers shoot at AND HIT a vehicle moving at high speed away from them
      3. Trash Compactor - Troopers aren't able to hit a group of people taking cover a good distance off down a dark cooridor. Concealment and Camouflage but they're able to get pretty close in the few seconds they have before they escape.
      4. Deathstar Escape Scene - Troopers miss every shot at the group of rebels who are going to lead them to the rebellion base...hmm, could it be they were ordered to miss?

      Every other time we see the stormtroopers fire they hit their targets perfectly.

      --
      There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
    42. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by jjohnson · · Score: 1

      I don't think the typical Stormtrooper reaction to a riot is the start handing out beatdowns.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    43. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you going to complain about the blast marks and carbon scoring adorning the rag tag rebel ships next?

      No, but I'll complain about the sounds you can hear from spaceships and blaster fire during battles in an open vacuum, where sound waves are unable to propegate.

      One point I was glad to see them correct in Ep I-III was the saber duels... I was very happy to see them take a page from the martial arts movies and show actual battle techniques, instead of prancing around like it's a fencing foil during a stadium match.

      But I enjoy picking movies apart, even when I like the movie itself. I'd say the only "unforgivable" mistakes Lucas made were his stereotypes... let us never forget Jar-jar Binks and his ghetto-fabulous "hair" and speech, and substandard IQ.

      George Lucas isn't a god but he sure thought up some neat ideas for a universe that John Scalzi will never come close to.

      Perhaps, but as Scalzi pointed out, it seems that the entire point of all those extra novels was simply to explain the inconsistencies in the movies.

    44. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2, Funny

      t's really just a classic medieval knights-and-dragons-and-ladies fairy tale.

      By way of Japan.

    45. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [citation needed]

    46. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by StuckInSyrup · · Score: 1
      I see you didn't react to the Sarlaac part:

      A monstrous yet immobile creature who lives in an exposed pit in the middle of a lifeless desert, waiting for large animals to apparently feel suicidal and trek out to throw themselves in? Yeah, not so much. Not every Sarlaac can count on an intergalactic mob boss to feed it tidbits.

      Has this guy never heard of the Antlion and it's sand-pits? (no, not the hl2 creature)

      --
      Ni.
    47. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by lymond01 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not necessarily. Wikipedia's entry on the topic suggests that Lucas always meant Stormtroopers to be clones (as per commentary of Episode II) and has an uncited comment by Lucas that some Stormtroopers were clones and some were conscripts. I believe the main giveaway that stormtroopers are clones is Princess Leia's line in IV, as Luke enters her cell in a trooper outfit:

      "Aren't you a little short for a stormtrooper?"

    48. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by erroneus · · Score: 1

      I always thought aspects of the storm trooper armor was to enable the person (or clone) within to work and fight in environments that humans couldn't normally live in. So there would be air processing, protection against radiation and the helmet might also contain communications and sensory enhancements like "terminator vision." I recall playing the republic commando game where the vision was modified to see a visual range wider than human eyes (a computer FPS display) would normally offer giving better peripheral vision and heads-up display information. If anyone thought that stormtrooper armor was just armor for protection, I think they were missing the point.

    49. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      Lol!

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    50. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by nine-times · · Score: 1

      He should have stuck to the physical aspects of the universe like noise in space and being able to see laser shots from the side ... oh, that's right, we've been over this before on Slashdot, with our friends, in popular mechanics, everywhere. My grandfather commented on the "wings" of ships that seemed to spend all their time in space.

      Well is all of that stuff any more useless to complain about? I mean it may be fun and interesting to think about these things, pick them apart, and note that they don't make sense, but either the movie is successful in getting you to suspend your disbelief or it isn't. Sound in space isn't really more dumb than the idea of translation android that hobbles around even in ideal circumstances because his joins are too rigid but can somehow walk around in the desert too.

      I mean there's really tons of things that don't make sense. A civilization that's technologically advanced enough to be adept at FTL space travel and cloning, but their fanciest androids have exposed wires all over the place? With all the wealth of the Empire, their best technological solution to Vadar being horrible injured is to dress him up in a life-support helmet that makes him look like a giant black dildo and put a series of lights and switches on his chest? That stuff is crazy.

      But, you know, it works. The aesthetics are coherent, and even with today's technology it has a nice retro-futuristic feel to it.

    51. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by bishiraver · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Reminds me of the Jaffa in SG1.

      In one episode, SG1 is showing some faction the difference between the staff weapons and the assault rifles that SG1 uses. They show a Jaffa trying to hit a target perhaps 20m away - he misses several times, as you can imagine the staff weapon is rather inaccurate. One of the SG1 team then proceeds to shoot the shit out of it with their P90.

      The relevancy is thus:

      They explain that the staff weapon isn't made for battle - it's made for fear and intimidation. The same could probably be said for storm troopers: the blasters are loud, inaccurate, and give away your position like nobody's business. Their armor is for show, to embody intimidation and quell resistance.

      It doesn't make much sense in the SG1 universe, however, as it seems like the different Goa'uld are constantly skirmishing each other. You'd think they'd use the staff weapons to intimidate their slaves, and something a little more efficient for actual battles with other Goa'uld.

      In Atlantis, Ronon has a pistol that seems to shoot the same kind of energy as the staff weapons, with the caveat that it can be set to stun. Because it's a pistol, he's much more accurate than a Jaffa ever would be with his staff weapon. ... but this is only marginally related to the topic at hand, which is: Why was a wookie living on endor?

    52. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

      If you really want to nitpick, why do they design fighters to require an external loading of astromechs from the outside? Wouldn't it make more sense to put the loading hatch in the bottom so the mech could be winched in on its own?

      This as least is defensible: While it'd save a bit of effort to have the droid be able to load itself, it's not really that much extra for a fighter base to have a loader, and there may be other mechanicals that would be harder to move around to allow bottom-access. Given that space and weight are always at a premium in a fighter, any design decision which can improve that is likely worth it.

      So, given a choice, it would be better to have the droids able to load themselves, but it may not be worth the other trade-offs in a fighter. (And they do load themselves in anything larger, from what I recall.)

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    53. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by mrdoogee · · Score: 2, Informative

      I may be wrong here, what with numerous Lucas retcons, but If I remember correctly in the Expanded Universe it is told that the Sarlacc has a bizarre digestive tract that actually forces some sort of symbiosis or inverted parasitism where the larger creature, the Sarlacc, keeps the "host" alive inside its stomach and feeds directly off the "host" through leech like appendages.

      Oh, and it reproduces with "space spores". Oh lord, I am such a nerd for knowing this.

    54. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by pluther · · Score: 3, Informative
      I loved Jack's speech about that, too:

      "This [indicates the staff weapon] is a weapon of terror. It is designed to strike fear into the enemy. This [the P90] is a weapon of war. It is designed to kill the enemy."

      Also, Chewbacca only visited Endor. He never lived there. That guy was a bad lawyer.

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    55. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Bad science like that "jolts" me out of the story and takes-away the realism, just as surely as if I was watching 24 and Jack Bauer started to cast fireballs.

      Yeah, because Jack Bauer is obviously based on realistic human skill and ability ;)

      What episode did JMS claim that in? I don't recall that but it's been awhile since I've watched the show.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    56. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by mrdoogee · · Score: 1

      Or watch Mallrats.

    57. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Jiro · · Score: 1

      The second death star was completed. "Now witness the firepower of this fully ARMED and OPERATIONAL battle station!" They just pretended it wasn't completed.

      And R2-D2 has to work with people, who don't speak bleep, all the time. Being able to talk is a necessary user interface element.

    58. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think your timing is a bit off. The foundation series was published in the early 1950s. Asimov's first story was published in 1939.

    59. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      When faced with a sea of white "moster faced" troups running at you, they don't have to shoot accurately. It is a sea of them after all. getting a lucky hit eventually is a given.

    60. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by bmajik · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here's something interesting:

      90% of shots fired in gun fights miss, even when the shooter is a cop, and even when they aren't supposed to miss.

      These are guys who are trained, have to qualify at various distances at a pistol range, etc.

      But it turns out that putting your shots on target when
      - the lighting/visibility is poor
      - the target is trying not to get shot
      - you aren't under ideal cover
      - you may be shooting off-handed or without proper time to posture/setup the shots
      - you weren't expecting to shoot anyone today and now you're in a firefight
      - THEY ARE SHOOTING BACK [!!] ... is really difficult in real life.

      So I'm not defending variable-grade shooting in the movie, but in the real world, _good_ marksmen who train constantly often do not make good shots in the heat of the moment.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    61. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      He's not an AI researcher. If the only AI he had available was that of a protocol droid, that's what he would use.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    62. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by eth1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think that the entire point of the stormtrooper uniform is to emphasize the mechanistic, monolithic nature of stormtroopers. It also makes sense in the context of stormtroopers all being clones.

      I was thinking along the same lines, but in a more practical sense. When the original movies were made, the cheapest and easiest way to make "clones" was probably to cover the actors' faces. No CGI crowds in the 70s. :) Having a fully covered/armored face would look quite odd without body armor, also.

    63. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      True that. But *when* it lacks consistence somewhere. Even a tiny spot that you only notice in your subconsicince. Oh, when it lacks that consistence... you're fucked!
      Really. For example the current Star Trek movie: When he left Kirk down on a deadly planet, with a "chance" to find that base (did he have a compass and a map?), the whole thing died for me.
      But when he found Spock, I unintentionally loudly said "WTF??". And I got a dozen or so people around me, laughing, smiling, nodding or something, because they thought the exact same thing. :)
      Of course this was not enough, because if one pea-sized ball of red mass can kill a planet, of course you won't run away when someone steers a cubic meter of that mass right into some kind of temporal black hole, right?? You won't even look shocked. Noo, all cool. Nothing's going to happen, because the writer was a complete retard. ^^

      Another example of this, was Mr floppy ear senator thingy (I deliberately erased its name from my brain) from Episode I.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    64. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oher Americans are smart enough to notice that even on that *same* wiki page, it shows them in normal BDUs

    65. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Silas+is+back · · Score: 2, Informative

      Stormtroopers are the same as Clone Troopers, and they're all clones. Just read some Expanded Universe stuff and you'll know.

      --
      this sig is useless
    66. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by kid_oliva · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You do realize it is "FICTION". Fiction is not necessarily suppose to be scientific. The purpose of Sci-Fi in my opinion is to deal with issues of the day in a format where people won't necessarily reject it out right. Many issues are dealt with and warnings are issued. Lucas screwed up the Star Wars universe with the newest trilogy in my opinion to warn against blind trust in Government, the pitfall of hubris and other things that were pertinent at the time and ring true throughout time. I don't appreciate the poor screenplay or crapping writing, but I understand what he was trying to say.

      --
      I eat Karma for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. That's why I don't have any.
    67. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Again · · Score: 1

      Uh, the second Death Star was never completed, you idiot. ...

      Yes, but I'll bet that although it was never completed it ran Linux. That's a lot more than you could say about the first (complete) Death Star.

    68. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Wraithlyn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Coruscant was even called Trantor (the name of Asimov's city planet) in an early Star Wars draft.

      I believe the name Coruscant actually comes from Timothy Zahn's excellent Thrawn trilogy.

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    69. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by bignetbuy · · Score: 1

      So?

    70. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nerd Rage!

      I love it.

    71. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      Maybe the reason that everyone uses the slow, noisy, obvious blasters is because the armour can stop everything else? Maybe the armor is for balistics only and that's why no one caries around projectile launchers. And the helmet could be to prevent blinding laser attacks, which is why its hard to see out of.

      Lets face it, Star Wars isn't sci-fi, it's fantasy. And with fantasy I could come up with a somewhat plausible explaination for just about every single one of his issues. Maybe the sarlac releases water vapor into the air that attracts wild animals looking for hydration. Maybe the asteroid worm was a genetically engineered creation that is designed to mine the asteroid for metal. It's not really that hard to explain away problems if you have a little imagination and read enough sci-fi/fantasy books.

    72. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anarchduke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      By way of George Lucas stealing every bit of creativity from Akira Kurasawa movies.

      --
      who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
    73. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Chapter80 · · Score: 4, Funny

      then who cares how functional RD2D would be

      RD2D? Red 2-dimensional thing? hmm..

      or is that pronounced roodie-toodie

    74. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by lumpenprole · · Score: 1

      R2-D2 Sure, he's cute, but the flaws in his design are obvious the first time he approaches anything but the shallowest of stairs. Also: He has jets, a periscope, a taser and oil canisters to make enforcer droids fall about in slapsticky fashion -- and no voice synthesizer. Imagine that design conversation: "Yes, we can afford slapstick oil and tasers, but we'll never get a 30-cent voice chip past accounting. That's just madness."

      I believe his primary function is a flight droid so they were built to interface with ships. Not a lot else. John Scalzi seems to suffer from the "must have everything" school of thought and doesn't think the future will focus on minimalism and getting one thing right. Thank god he's not writing software and just another hot air blogger. I reject Episodes I, II & III so I don't know what he's talking about with the oil slick and jets.

      Yeah, well my toasters primary function is to make toast. However, they decided to put a lever that allows me to communicate with it so that I'm not in the dark as to what's going on. Here's the design meeting:

      "Hey we've got this kickass flight droid that will sit right behind you and help you out while you fly"

      "Sweet, so it'll like, tell me if there's problems"

      "Oh sure. As long as you speak boopie-beepie"

      "...."

      C-3PO Can't fully extend his arms; has a bunch of exposed wiring in his abs; walks and runs as if he has the droid equivalent of arthritis. And you say, well, he was put together by an eight-year-old. Yes, but a trip to the nearest Radio Shack would fix that. Also, I'm still waiting to hear the rationale for making a protocol droid a shrieking coward, aside from George Lucas rummaging through a box of offensive stereotypes (which he'd later return to while building Jar-Jar Binks) and picking out the "mincing gay man" module.

      Again, you're overlooking his primary function. C-3PO is a protocol droid designed to serve humans, and boasts that he is fluent "in over six million forms of communication." So he's got arthritis, well, you didn't build him to be flexible or fight. You built him to look pretty and translate. Everything else is bells and whistles. I think he was meant to stand in a corner for some rich merchant or politician and translate any language imaginable. Are you going to tell me that my car is flawed because I couldn't afford a $20 toaster to put in the dash?

      Nah, I'll tell you your car is flawed if they put an air conditioner in it that only blows hot sand. So what he's a protocol droid? They gave him ARMS AND LEGS. And then made sure that they barely work? What the hell.

      Death Star An unshielded exhaust port leading directly to the central reactor? Really? And when you rebuild it, your solution to this problem is four paths into the central core so large that you can literally fly a spaceship through them? Brilliant. Note to the Emperor: Someone on your Death Star design staff is in the pay of Rebel forces. Oh, right, you can't get the memo because someone threw you down a huge exposed shaft in your Death Star throne room.

      Uh, the second Death Star was never completed, you idiot. The rebels learned about it and attacked it before it had everything completed so anything like "four paths to the central core" or "exposed shafts" could well have been necessary during its construction. Haven't you seen Clerks or watched Robot Chicken's parody of Palpatine trying to talk to the foreman?

      Yeah, so here's a guy who already lost one giant pile of money (plus like a million people which makes Skywalker one of the great genociders of the SW universe, but I digress) by having a kid blow the first one up with a single shot. You're going to build another one, you know he and his pain in the ass rebellion is still around, and is watching you. So what you do see, is oh, DON'T PUT THE EXPLOSIVE REACTOR IN UNTIL LAST. Just a thought.

      But

      --
      Disclaimer: MINAA (Mummy! I'm Not An Animal!)
    75. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by brkello · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe protocol droid software was open source? :)

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    76. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by tixxit · · Score: 2, Informative

      C-3PO Can't fully extend his arms; has a bunch of exposed wiring in his abs; walks and runs as if he has the droid equivalent of arthritis. And you say, well, he was put together by an eight-year-old. Yes, but a trip to the nearest Radio Shack would fix that. Also, I'm still waiting to hear the rationale for making a protocol droid a shrieking coward, aside from George Lucas rummaging through a box of offensive stereotypes (which he'd later return to while building Jar-Jar Binks) and picking out the "mincing gay man" module.

      George Lucas based C3PO & R2D2 off of the 2 main characters in The Hidden Fortress. Their opposing and awkward personalities make for an awesome/funny dynamic between them. Star Wars is, first and foremost, a movie made to entertain.

    77. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you. We as humans will have a lot to answer for in the future considering we designed and someone bought the "pacer" automobile. Bad design is a part of human nature.

    78. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by The+Living+Fractal · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'll bite (some Fanboi ass):

      Uh, the second Death Star was never completed, you idiot. The rebels learned about it and attacked it before it had everything completed so anything like "four paths to the central core" or "exposed shafts" could well have been necessary during its construction. Haven't you seen Clerks or watched Robot Chicken's parody of Palpatine trying to talk to the foreman?

      IIRC it was made operationally ready and intended to be used far before the Rebel spies thought it was operational. Therefore, if the Empire INTENDED to use it in this state, and they left it wide open to destruction at this point... who is the idiot? I'll give you a hint, it's not John Scalzi.

      --
      I do not respond to cowards. Especially anonymous ones.
    79. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Tom9729 · · Score: 1

      It's been awhile but IIRC the Endor troopers were wearing different armor.

    80. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by SBrach · · Score: 5, Funny

      I know right, everyone knows the french don't go to battle.

    81. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Mr_Magick · · Score: 1

      I believe the main giveaway that stormtroopers are clones is Princess Leia's line in IV, as Luke enters her cell in a trooper outfit:

      "Aren't you a little short for a stormtrooper?"

      Are there not height requirements for any of the armed forces? I thought Airmen had to be a certain size, but I may be wrong.

    82. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's not a giveaway -- could easily be a stereotype, rather than a clone.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    83. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > When the original movies were made, the cheapest and easiest way to make "clones" was probably to cover the actors' faces

      Yep. Then you can just hire the same 10 actors to get shot over and over!

    84. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did Red4man say "...like a fanboi's scorn"? Sorry, I'm certain he meant "...like an otaku fanboi's scorn". Easy to forget that part.

    85. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dress uniform

    86. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the space combat scenes were inspired by other films.

    87. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Ouka · · Score: 1

      I believe his primary function is a flight droid so they were built to interface with ships. Not a lot else. John Scalzi seems to suffer from the "must have everything" school of thought and doesn't think the future will focus on minimalism and getting one thing right. Thank god he's not writing software and just another hot air blogger. I reject Episodes I, II & III so I don't know what he's talking about with the oil slick and jets.

      I can understand R2 series not coming factory-installed with a voice mod. However, given the disproportionate ammount of time this particular astromech droid spends trying to communicate with non-binary-speakers, I have a hard time believing that all of his owners would have the patience to rely on crude beep-code translations, C3P0, or wait for him to jack into a terminal to figure out what he was trying to say.

      The little guy tries to save the day as often as any other character in the series, how could the other characters not be annoyed at missing critical information when translation wasn't available?

      Hell, I've upgraded all of my main boards to brands/models that have voice error messages instead of annoying beep codes that require a manual to decipher. You can be damn sure that a voice mod would be one of the first things I did to a sentient droid.

    88. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by residieu · · Score: 1

      A bad lawyer? His little rant about Chewbacca and monkeys got the jury to award millions in damages for "harassment". That's a pretty damn good lawyer, if you ask me.

    89. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and apparently some letters from his name

    90. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by SBrach · · Score: 1

      No, he is a hero in a TV show, of course he has hero like skills and abilities. But what does he do that is physically impossible.

    91. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, the storm troopers' battle ineffectiveness is actually one of the few things that ring true about the Star Wars universe.

      Once you've got control of the galaxy, you don't want an effective fighting force. Who are you going to use them against? What you want is an effective *intimidation* force that is unable to fight effectively against your smaller but more capable praetorian guard. You keep your praetorian guard divided and intimidated by the higher ups too. Everybody in the galaxy is afraid of the guys just above him, except of course *you*.

      Look at military dictatorships. Once they settle in, they're guaranteed to have a totally pathetic fighting capability, despite despoiling the land to support their military. Hitler inherited a capable military culture, so why did he build the smaller parallel Waffen-SS? Because if he had won WW2, he'd have let the regular military stagnate, keeping them under the thumb of a smaller force that he'd keep under his personal thumb. The result would look a lot like the Star Wars Imperial forces. At every level people would be intimidated by those just above them. At the bottom would be the people of course, but the "fighting" forces just above them wouldn't be much more capable than them.

      The Death Star confirms this political strategy. Aside from its well known engineering fault, it would be extremely inefficient from a strategic standpoint when compared to a fleet of Star Destroyers of a equivalent displacement. It isn't a weapon designed to achieve strategic superiority, it's designed to keep a relatively small number of individuals in line. In fact, that's exactly how it was used in its one successful engagement. Won't tell us the location of the secret base, princess? Take THAT.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    92. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Laurence0 · · Score: 1

      Also bear in mind that the Empire sees low level, front line troops as expendable, and that it's better to throw hundreds of cheap troops in than train up a few more expensive ones.

      They have exactly the same attitude with space fighters - the TIE fighter is unshielded, has no hyperdrive and less weapons than an X-Wing. However, they get deployed in large numbers.

    93. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Pop the DVD in, crack a beer, and watch the film. Anytime you feel the nihilism of deep criticism threaten to overcome the movie, take a sip. Fanbois are well advised to keep several crates of ale on hand.

    94. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Evidently, the first Foundation story (which introduced Trantor and the Empire) was published in 1942; the stories weren't collected into books until 1951.

      Still, close enough for government work...

    95. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      It doesn't make much sense in the SG1 universe, however, as it seems like the different Goa'uld are constantly skirmishing each other.

      It makes perfect sense once you realize a few things:

      First, slaves aren't the only ones who need intimidating -- other Jaffa could use a little intimidation, also.

      And second, do you really want to say that the weapons given to you by your god aren't actually good weapons, only good firework shows? Seems that if a god makes it clear that he needs to impress people, he's admitting some failing as a god.

      Oh, and Ra was in charge for a very long time.

      You could argue that some faction should've broken free, done it the right way, and taken over the galaxy -- a sort of natural selection. But the second argument still holds. Those gods live for thousands of years, so if they're going to be stupid, they're going to be stupid for awhile. Keep in mind, even with superior weapons (for some value of "superior"), it took a long time for Earth to free the Jaffa.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    96. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      John Scalzi seems to suffer from the "must have everything" school of thought and doesn't think the future will focus on minimalism and getting one thing right

      Repeat after me: A LONG TIME AGO in a galaxy far, far away.

      What is this future you speak of?!?

    97. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      To be fair, many of the space vehicles we've seen which do have wings are also capable of landing on planets.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    98. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by SGDarkKnight · · Score: 1

      He building the protocol droid to help his mother out, not to help him out.

      --

      ...A no smoking section in a restaurant is like having a no peeing section in a swimming pool...
    99. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RadioShack

    100. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of all the complaints about Episode I, this has to be one of the most inane. C3PO was built to help Anakin's mother. He even explains that in the movie: "He's a protocol droid, to help mom." The novelization further explains that he's used for dealing with Jawas and other aliens that they have to work with on Tatooine.

    101. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, Azimov's Trantor did have oceans with algae in them -- thus, the oxygen wasn't an issue, at least.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    102. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But he was also Darth Vader, the baddest ass mother fucker of your childhood...

    103. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by hoooocheymomma · · Score: 1

      also note that venus fly traps only need the flies because their soil is deficient in nitrogen. they don't NEED to feed if they can get sufficient nitrogen from their soil. why can't the sarlac work that way? the answer: because the people criticizing this element in star wars have no imagination.

      Same with asteroid worms. A worm sits in a hole in an asteroid that will in all probability never see another space ship other than the millennium falcon. Completely improbable. Now, enter imagination: perhaps the worm doesn't eat space ships, but the asteroid? Perhaps the worm was not trying to eat the ship, but attack it, because it was potentially a threat, or perhaps simply because it was perturbed by the ship (they did shoot the worm in the mouth)?

    104. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes sense. Usually after a program becomes old and useless, only THEN does a company release it to open source. :(

    105. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Tekfactory · · Score: 1

      The Princess' attendants were not the main characters in Hidden Fortress.

      The Princess and her protector were much more important, however the two attendants did offer another viewpoint and comedic relief.

    106. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by residieu · · Score: 1

      I think you could save even more space and weight by replacing the droid with a computer. The droid only had a reach of half a foot or so, how often are there going to be problems with the fighter that the droid can actually reach?

    107. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Azathoth_lca · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He built C3PO from spare parts he found lying around. Protocol droid parts are what he found.

    108. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that when he's done, his femmy droid ends up looking just like all the other protocol droids in the universe. Where are we to assume they came from?

    109. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      George Lucas isn't a god but he sure thought up some neat ideas for a universe that John Scalzi will never come close to.

      This has to be my favorite line from your rant. You obviously have no idea who John Scalzi is, do you?

      (Here's a hint: check out the lists of Hugo award winners from the past few years.)

    110. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Darby · · Score: 1

      I believe his primary function is a flight droid so they were built to interface with ships

      I was always under the impression that the design goal behind him was to make a Swiss Army droid..all those attachments, gadgets, and gizmos man.

    111. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 4, Insightful

      R2-D2
        Sure, he's cute, but the flaws in his design are obvious the first time he approaches anything but the shallowest of stairs. Also: He has jets, a periscope, a taser and oil canisters to make enforcer droids fall about in slapsticky fashion -- and no voice synthesizer. Imagine that design conversation: "Yes, we can afford slapstick oil and tasers, but we'll never get a 30-cent voice chip past accounting. That's just madness."

      I believe his primary function is a flight droid so they were built to interface with ships. Not a lot else. John Scalzi seems to suffer from the "must have everything" school of thought and doesn't think the future will focus on minimalism and getting one thing right. Thank god he's not writing software and just another hot air blogger. I reject Episodes I, II & III so I don't know what he's talking about with the oil slick and jets.

      R2 is a Sith Lord.

      Think about it for a minute.
      1. We know that damaged Sith get a mechanical exoskeleton.
      2. People can understand R2. Canon states that requires The Force.
      3. He's got lightning attacks.
      4. He was present at the very beginning of the series. Used Force Persuade to prevent the shots from being fired. "Hold your fire; there are no life signs aboard."
      5. His jets can't provide enough thrust to lift him. He can fly. We've seen him do it without using his thrusters.
      6. Palpatine hid himself from the Jedi; it's a known trick.
      7. In IV, he was able to stand outside the bar without getting picked up by the Stormtroopers who were looking for him. "I am not the droid you're looking for."

      Watch the scene with the cave on Dagobah again when Yoda and R2 are judging Luke's performance.

      Sith.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    112. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Meumeu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You do realize it is "FICTION". Fiction is not necessarily suppose to be scientific. The purpose of Sci-Fi in my opinion is to deal with issues of the day in a format where people won't necessarily reject it out right. Many issues are dealt with and warnings are issued. Lucas screwed up the Star Wars universe with the newest trilogy in my opinion to warn against blind trust in Government, the pitfall of hubris and other things that were pertinent at the time and ring true throughout time. I don't appreciate the poor screenplay or crapping writing, but I understand what he was trying to say.

      I won't even bother to do anything more than copy-paste this:

      This silly opinion implies that the word "fiction" nullifies the word "science." Since it is "fiction", and fiction is by definition "not true", then we can make "not true" any and all science that gets in the way, right?

      Hogwash. By the same logic, the term "detective fiction" gives the author license to totally ignore standard procedures and techniques used by detectives, the term "military fiction" allows the author to totally ignore military tactics and strategy, and the term "historical fiction" allows the author to totally ignore the relevant history.

      Imagine a historical fiction novel where Napoleon at Waterloo defeated the knights of the Round Table by using the Enola Gay to drop an atom bomb. It's OK because it is "fiction", right?

      This non-argument is the favorite of science fiction fans who like all the zipping spaceships and ray guns but who actually know practically nothing about real science. And who cannot be bothered to go learn.

    113. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by DrVomact · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not a "Science story". It is a fairy tale. And a damned enjoyable one. Or do you take the "Sci" in "Sci-Fi" literally?

      --
      Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
    114. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Episode 1? What do you mean?

    115. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by anglico · · Score: 1

      Damn i wish I had mod points!

    116. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      R2D2 and C3P0 are not too short to be unique identifiers. Unicode (UTF-32 standard) could contain 3.40282367 Ã-- 10^38 possible combinations in just four characters. We're just lucky they got labels contained entirely within the ASCII subset.

    117. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by residieu · · Score: 1

      But we see another Protocol droid at the start of Phantom Menace, and it's just as physically awkward as C-3PO, unless that one was also built by a kid in the desert, this was the way the protocol droids were designed to operate.

    118. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by geekoid · · Score: 1

      They where always clones. Kind of the point.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    119. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by davygrvy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, WWII dogfights between messerschmitts, spitfires and mustangs

      --
      -=[ place .sig here ]=-
    120. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by geekoid · · Score: 1

      yes, but not that little of a difference.

      of course, it could also be becasue Luke was initially supposed to by younger.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    121. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Darby · · Score: 1

      Are there not height requirements for any of the armed forces? I thought Airmen had to be a certain size, but I may be wrong.

      Pilots have to be *below* a certain height or they break their knees if they have to eject....

    122. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      The Stormtrooper armor also did a great job of deflecting blaster shots, and in the opening scene, they defeat dozens of soldiers while losing only one or two of their own. Only when they start fighting the heros, not other generic foes, does their aim become terrible, and their armor become useless. All movies everywhere are like that. Modern, Sci-fi, Fantasy. The bad guys have 0% accuracy with their rifles, blasters, and arrows. At best they can hit your shoulder, which in movies has no major arteries. Also their armor is useless. A 4 inch dagger can easily pierce a sold steel breast plate and instantly kill the bad guy knights. It's a universal trope, and hardly limited to star wars.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    123. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by jimmydevice · · Score: 1

      How did he fit in the uniform? Since it's armor and not form fitting. Starwars is fun space opera. Anyone who argues the correctness is being silly.

    124. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by residieu · · Score: 1

      I imagine a moisture farm gathers water, an important commodity on a desert planet.

    125. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaand it was beaten to it by Sergio Leone. Viva l'Italia!

    126. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Again, you're overlooking his primary function. C-3PO is a protocol droid designed to serve humans, and boasts that he is fluent "in over six million forms of communication." So he's got arthritis, well, you didn't build him to be flexible or fight.

      You do to be fluent in non-verbal communication.

    127. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Really? If the blasters are just that bad then I find it hard to believe that a society that can make lightsabers couldn't just build the same types of guns we have today. I can hit a human target at 10 yards with just about anything. With most of my scoped rifles I can easily tag anything out to 300 yards. Of course they also show them shooting from the hip (possible, but takes a lot of practice and still not as effective as bringing the sights up into eye-line), so I doubt their training still :).

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    128. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      And to bring it back to Star Wars, if Leia knew they were let go and that the escape was just too easy, why did she fly directly to the sekrit Rebel base instead of meeting at a safehouse somewhere? They still would have been tracked but R2 could have had the data offloaded and analyzed with a bit more peace and quiet. And the Rebels must have some mad hackers on their end to be able to look through a set of plans like the Death Star's and found that fatal flaw in twenty minutes. Microsoft wouldn't stand a chance.

      I work with point clouds. A 10x10 room takes up about 2 Gigs.

      The sheer volume of data in the Death Star plans would have been an untold number of Petabytes.

      Also, they had more time than 20 minutes due to the relativistic effects of hyperspace. This always comes up when I'm at work and away from my d20 source books, but there's a significant time debt owed when you go through hyperspace.

      The Falcon is exceedingly fast; with a good roll, you can get somewhere in a few days rather than a few years.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    129. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Ironically, none of those are a [problem in the Star Wars universe.

      Some space ships have wings for tactical reasons, not for atmosphere mobility.

      And if you designed a small space vehicle that travels at the speeds the X-Wing move at, you would design them to 'bank' instead of just fl;ip arund. That would kill people.
      Bear in mand they ahve effectively mastered gravity in the SW universe. That shanges a lot fo things.

      I have always* assumed the sounds where cockpit interpretation** of what's in the area.

      *Yes, walking out of the movie theaters after the intitaly release I thought that.

      ** This is done to a limited degree in modern fighter cockpits, and work is being done to make it more sophisticated.
      Aureal warning are much better then looking at a screen.

      Light goes much faster. I'mnot sur what you are referring to. The Blasters? you do know they aren't ray guns, right?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    130. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "The force is strong with this one".

      'nuff said.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    131. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Excellent points.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    132. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Verdatum · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All creative works can be shown to be derivative of other work. What of it?

    133. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Given that the US Army has a minimum height requirement for Military Police MOS I don't consider that the short stormtrooper question must indicate that they are clones.

    134. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      That's true. The wing bit I can live with. But some of the other ones are a more interesting. Even 2001: Space Odyssey got the "no sound in space" part in 1968. Explosions in space is another issue. Or what about apparent gravity in X-Wings and Tie-Fighters? They didn't look particularly "floating" to me as they duke it out in space. Etc...

      I understand it's fiction and understand it's obviously not realistic and completely believable, but it does seem that a lot of authors in general ... don't seem to think things completely through these days. Action has taken place of thought? Due partially, of course, to the readership. Most modern readers, it seems, can't handle something by Hugo, Dickens, or a number of 19th (and before) century writers because it's "long" and "boring" and there's no "action," etc.

      Same with movies, music, etc.

      [/rant :)]

    135. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except it doesn't work against rocks and sticks wielded by teddy bears.

    136. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      they look cool demmit!!

    137. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      R2D2 was built by the Empires version of Microsoft. Remember, Luke's uncle had a 50% failure rate when he bought R2D2 (see recent XBOX360 article). With a penny-pinching maximize profit company like MS, you should expect profit-maximizing features like using a voice chip that an only beep and requires an additional protocol-droid to understand, instead of a $0.01 more expensive one that can actually make vocal noises.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    138. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Just a note, but many, many cops are not very good shots. Some are (generally those who take in interest in firearms outside of their job), but the majority of them will go their entire career and never fire their weapon aside from practice, and their practice is often the bare minimum required (which is often not much - a couple of range trips per year). Their shooting is also generally just at a stationary target at a known range to qualify and be done with it. Most civilian gun enthusiasts get far more practice in per year (particularly anyone who participates in a shooting sport like IDPA or IPSC) and will fare better than your average cop.

      I'd compare the storm troopers to wartime soldiers instead. Not familiar with how much training the average soldier does on marksmanship, but I'd hope it's a lot more than in law enforcement.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    139. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by arose · · Score: 1

      A lot of these arguments apply to many sci-fi/fantasy works, not just SW so why waste your time on the critical analysis. Are you bettering society? Congratulations, you just tore apart something that was made over three decades ago.

      I'll get right to it. Let me brake my actions into clear steps so other people can better society with us:

      1. Heed eldavojohn's words.
      2. Ignore his actions.
      3. Better society just like he is.

      We are saved.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    140. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Atrox666 · · Score: 1

      Those are FFL DRESS uniforms. But if you meet a Legionnaire by all means make fun of his uniform. I'm sure it will go quite well for you. Make fun of their name too they really like that. I've trained with some legionnaires, they're quite intense.

    141. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Funny

      Duh, that's why they send the Foreign Legion.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    142. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by hey! · · Score: 1

      The storm trooper helmets are based on Samurai armor, which sometimes had elaborate artificial faces, including facial hair. I've seen Roman battle masks with faces too.

      The effect is creepy, because the face doesn't change. You can attack them or vice versa; the soldier can kill or be at your mercy, but the face doesn't show anything.

      The storm troopers, I'd argue, aren't what we'd think of as a military force. They're more like an internal security force. The uniform is highly effective if you want to turn somebody into a killer, because it makes every trooper anonymous. I visited Chile shortly after Pinochet was out, and the carbineros (federal police) still liked to wear their mirror sunglasses. Getting pulled over by these guys who'd been disappearing people a couple years ago was intimidating.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    143. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      Not to mention, the phrase "Look at the wookie dance." got a guy's head to explode. What lawyer wouldn't love that ability?

    144. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - you weren't expecting to shoot anyone today and now you're in a firefight

      hahaha! You with the award for Best Line in Thread!

    145. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anarchduke · · Score: 1

      OH YEAH!! Explain the fucking EWOKS!!!!!

      --
      who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
    146. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      It makes perfect sense once you realize a few things:

      First, slaves aren't the only ones who need intimidating -- other Jaffa could use a little intimidation, also.

      And second, do you really want to say that the weapons given to you by your god aren't actually good weapons, only good firework shows? Seems that if a god makes it clear that he needs to impress people, he's admitting some failing as a god.

      And third, do you really want to give your flunkies weapons that can be used effectively against YOU? Nah, you give them some PoS that looks good, sounds good, but doesn't really work terribly well.

      Then when they complain about how hard it is to hit someone with the damn things, you tell them it's because they can't shoot worth a shit, and to spend more time at the range....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    147. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by arose · · Score: 1

      It doesn't make much sense in the SG1 universe, however, as it seems like the different Goa'uld are constantly skirmishing each other. You'd think they'd use the staff weapons to intimidate their slaves, and something a little more efficient for actual battles with other Goa'uld.

      And it makes no sense in Star Wars either, the rebels are a known threat, if stormtroopers where just the intimidating jackboots of the empire then special forces would have shown up at some point in the movies.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    148. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by davygrvy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed, but one also looks to Science Fiction where Science, though not predominant to the story, serves as somewhat accurate glimpses into the future.. But GL gets away from that right in the beginning of the movie with "A long time ago, in a galaxy far far away"

      If one is looking to Science Fiction for the Science aspect, there are better ways to find it. Through books for example.

      --
      -=[ place .sig here ]=-
    149. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think it's because the first movies came out in the 70's and 80's aimed at the PG-13 market, and we didn't have major release movies showing endless hordes getting mowed down in the style of Tarentino or Rodriguez back then. Heck, the PG-13 didn't even exist at the time, and a R rating would have probably made Star Wars stillborn. As far as I can recall, the first three movies were completely bloodless. Pretty sure all of them were, come to think of it.

      Shooting a stormtrooper was like shooting a robot; they didn't come across as being "people" on the screen, just faceless, nameless "bad guys" with no emotional impact or graphic violence tied to their deaths. I think if they were creating the stormtrooper costumes today they'd look quite different.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    150. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by mastahYee · · Score: 1

      Skip the article, read eldavojohn's post above. The article is a failure to sensationalize shallow observations in hopes of generating traffic. It's fiction, all that matters is if you're entertained. "EPIC FAIL" as a term, as a meme, as a method of verbalizing extremes, has become an epic fail.

    151. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They seem to be susceptible to rock throwing ewoks.

    152. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by BForrester · · Score: 3, Informative

      Marksmanship of imperial forces is easily explained by the steamroller principle. If you have a seemingly endless supply of soldiers (and you are not overly concerned with casualties), it is not important to outfit them with anything more than mediocre equipment. The cost savings in ammunition and equipment allows the empire to readily equip new conscripts or "clones", as it were.

      This concept has historically worked adequately enough for China and Russia. It's a small irony that the AK-47, a communist-bloc weapon designed to be the ultimate bargain-basement firearm, was extremely competitive with much more expensive counterparts in the US/NATO arsenal.

    153. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by dyingtolive · · Score: 2, Funny

      Imagine a historical fiction novel where Napoleon at Waterloo defeated the knights of the Round Table by using the Enola Gay to drop an atom bomb. It's OK because it is "fiction", right?

      Would have worked for Harry Turtledove.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    154. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2, Interesting
      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    155. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by greymond · · Score: 1

      I haven't read the article.

      But, what you posted are not only valid points, but they are things that my Wife who is not a sci-fi fan would have rebutted with just because she has a good deal of common sense.

    156. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anarke_Incarnate · · Score: 1

      Don't fool yourselves. Cops are not great with their guns. Most wear them on their belt along with a spare magazine or two and a flashlight and cuffs. They are rarely used unless the yearly qualifications are due and even then, maybe 200 rounds are expended. Last year alone, I, not a cop, shot over 2500 rounds of 9mm and another 1500rds of .22 at the same targets they use. The idea of seeing that they need to put ~40 out of 50 shots anywhere in a man sized target at 20yds is not inspiring of confidence. The target is not moving and not shooting back.

    157. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Landspeeders travel at 300 km/h so a seat belt would be advisable. Comparing it to Star trek is a non sequiter and irrelevant.

      That said, it was made in the 70's. Hardly anyone used seat belts.

      Storm troop armor is also an enviromental suit. It could be that since the helets are designed to fit exactly 1 body type perfectly, that the insides where lit up, he just couldn't use them correctly.

      There aren't designed to block blaster bolts.

      As for the plans, maybe there was an engineer comments that said: /*This is a fatal design issue, will redress later*/ heh.
      Or it's just hubris. Being the superiour race, nothing that do can be flawed. It's all just leading to there moment of triumph.

      She could ahve just radio them the plans. Or make copies.
      Anyhow, it's all from a 1970 perspective.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    158. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by geekoid · · Score: 1

      The droids can leave there area in space. Not in the heat of combat, but after they could float out and make repairs.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    159. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      If you look closely, the "blasters" are Sterling's and MG42's. I have shot both, and they are VERY accurate.

      Heh.

    160. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      I distinctly remember Obi-Wan saying something like "Look at those blast marks, only imperial stormtroopers are so precise" near the start of the film. The we spend the rest of the film watching them failing to hit anything at all.

      --
      No sig today...
    161. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Yes - but he's doing a bad job of debunking it. Sound in space and wings on interstellar craft, fine - explore these aspects. But TFA just savages things without actually thinking about them at all. For example, he has a big go at the Death Star having this glaring exhaust port weakness. Well maybe it's not so easy to design a weapon that generates enough energy to blow up planets that doesn't have a big exhaust port. Not to mention that it's the size of a small moon yet can travel interstellar distances. I can see all the storm troopers dying of heat exhaustion the first time it's fired or starts moving. "No," says the engineer with his last, parched breaths, "I couldn't put an exhaust port in it as that would have been a weakness."

      The earlier poster covered a lot of the other points. If someone wants to point out logical failings in movies then fine (it's quite often me), but they should at least have the imagination to do so.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    162. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say he "stole" the idea, perhaps "borrowed". A city planet makes sense though, if you think about it: after all, right now, we humans are already building bigger and bigger cities. New York is a good example of this as you point out. These cities have to import tons of stuff to survive, and they have to export all their waste too. NYC has to dump all theirs in Staten Island I think.

      There's lots of cases where cities have grown so much they've swallowed up neighboring cities or merged with them. Here in the Phoenix metro area where I live, there's a bunch of smaller cities like Mesa, Chandler, Scottsdale, Glendale, Peoria, etc., which are all part of the same metro area. Usually, the only thing dividing these separate cities is a particular street. (It's especially annoying when you cross over into Scottsdale territory and the traffic light timing changes from leading green arrow to lagging green arrows.)

      An entire planet that's a city is simply the logical extension of a civilization where urbanization has grown in an uncontrolled manner for a long time. Presuming this civilization has spaceflight, and is able to feed the city planet with food, fuel/energy, and other resources from other planets without light speed being a problem (either because of FTL travel, or because other planets in the same system are able to provide these), there's no reason it can't be done. Of course, with such advanced technology, they may be able to produce their food in factories using artificial processes directly from raw materials, rather than having to use agriculture. Even with agriculture, as long as you have enough energy (for light) and water, you could build giant multi-story buildings to grow food inside, and have far more acreage of farmland than by using natural soil on the ground. We can already grow better-quality plants using hydroponic methods than by traditional farming, but it requires a lot of energy and work so we usually don't bother because it's a lot easier to just use existing natural soil and freely-available sunlight and rain.

      Remember, we're already thinking about a lot of these possibilities, because our population is expanding exponentially and we're going to run out of usable farmland before long. We just passed 7 billion, and we'll probably double that in a 2-3 decades.

    163. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by geekoid · · Score: 1

      3PO can also play chess....oh crap, he wasn't building a protocol droid, he was building a Dungeon Master.

      Now it all makes sense.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    164. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by retchdog · · Score: 1

      Wow, that "static" effect is damned annoying...

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    165. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      Even 2001: Space Odyssey got the "no sound in space" part in 1968.

      You can't have "lasers - pew pew" without the 'pew-pew'. :D

      In general, I agree with you. But can you imagine watching a long Star Wars space battle with no sound except the quiet hiss of the cabin cooling? Yep - it could certainly be very atmospheric, but it would be quite a different atmosphere than what was achieved in Star Wars.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    166. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Selfbain · · Score: 1

      The part that bothered me the most about them appearing in the prequels is that they played such an important part you'd think Obewan would recognize them. Or maybe he's just racist (droidist?) and all droids look alike to him.

      --
      Well, it has never been successfully tested.
    167. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is worse, tearing apart something that was made over three decades ago or whining about someone tearing apart something that was made over three decades ago?

    168. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, well, I'm not stupid. Tons of things in the SW universe make absolutely no sense.

      Well, I suppose that's a huge part of the difference between Lucas and somebody like Kubrick.

      I'm always reminded of Mark Twain little essay about James Fenimore Cooper, too.

    169. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by TempeTerra · · Score: 3, Informative

      At the risk of being out-geeked; in the original trilogy it wasn't stated that the storm troopers were clones, they're just some generic jackbooted thugs with masks so you're not tempted to empathise with them (the contractors on the other hand...).

      IIRC some of the earlier Star Wars novels explained the 'clone wars' as being a failed attempt by the empire to clone bazillions of guys to crew their star destroyers. Turned out the clones didn't have <strike>souls</strike> a presence in the force and went insane or something. So the storm troopers not clones, just some mooks in plastic armour.

      --
      .evom ton seod gis eht
    170. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Even 2001: Space Odyssey got the "no sound in space" part in 1968.

      2001 is hard sci-fi. Star wars is a fairy tale in space.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    171. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Good analysis. TFA had some lame complaints, like the sarlaac (just like an antlion as you said, and this idea was again used in the movie "Enemy Mine"), but it also completely missed a giant poor design choice (maybe the biggest) in Star Wars: the AT-AT, and its 2-legged sibling. What sense do those things make? They're big, slow, top-heavy, and only the head has any weapons mounted on it. They really make very little sense compared to something like a modern tank.

      Now, how about what on the surface seems like a really good design choice for once: the speederbike, used in ROTJ in the Endor forest. It's small, it's really fast, and it's armed, and it has anti-gravity so rough terrain isn't a problem. This seems like a great form of personal transport for the future, plus being very useful for the military with an armed version.

    172. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Why would a slave to a junk dealer need a protocol/translator droid?

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    173. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Z1NG · · Score: 1

      Stormtroopers [wikia.com] are the same as Clone Troopers, and they're all clones. Just read some Expanded Universe stuff and you'll know.

      Well, storm troopers in the films may or may not be clones, it is a bit ambiguous. As far as the extended universe goes, there is less room for debate. During Timothy Zahns novels, the troopers were generally not clones, at least until Thrawn found cloning cylinders, and started cranking more out. However, this was written before the prequel trilogy when the clone wars were just a vague line from the originals.

    174. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by MadAnalyst · · Score: 1

      If you will recall, young Anakin spoke to his master Watto in his native language. So that makes 5,999,998 he can't understand. Since we are nitpicking here.

    175. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by hesiod · · Score: 1

      Or because he didn't want to acknowledge the droids, lest it lead to revealing too many dirty secrets too soon.

    176. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by dbIII · · Score: 1

      There was a mix up in the order.

      Instead of perfect soldiers they ended up with the perfect Rugby team.

    177. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by fumblebruschi · · Score: 2, Informative

      So, how do you excuse away the fact that there are almost no rails overlook huge falls?

      Have you ever been to China? Ever seen a construction project there? There are no rails, no ropes, no traffic cones, often not even any signs.

      When my dad was a kid (before WWII) construction projects in Boston would store their explosives in a dynamite shack -- a wooden shed right next to the sidewalk, with no lock and no safety precautions whatever except a sign on the door that said "DYNAMITE". It was just assumed that people were smart enough to stay away.

      Just because we happen to live in a time and place where we've made a fad out of giving big priority to safety precautions, that doesn't make it a universal principle. Fads are temporary. I could easily believe that thirty years from now, kids will be looking at old pictures and asking their parents "Why did you wear those funny-looking things on your heads when you were riding bikes?" This one isn't even a plot hole. It's just that the people in the Star Wars movies happen to live in a time and place where the culture does not have much interest in safety precautions.

    178. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I see lots of people wailing about midichlorians...

      Perhaps they are not aware of the theorized origin of mitochondria?

      In a nut-shell, they appear to have started as endosymbionts which enabled animals cell precursors to process energy more efficiently, much like legume's can process nitrogen more efficiently because of their own endosymbionts.

      The medichlorians simply appear to be an endosymbiont that enhances supernatural abilities. (It is possible that this symbiosis causes structural changes in the host which produces the effects; much like legumes produce root nodules when hosting Sinorhizobium. This would render the "black market midichlorian injection" idea moot-- it would take months of incubation, perhaps years, to develop the needed adaptations resulting from being a host. This may also explain the need to train little jedi school kids when they are still in diapers in order to get full effect as well.

      Compared to the stormtrooper armor, this one is at least plausible (in as much as supernatural abilities are plausible to begin with.)

    179. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by nametaken · · Score: 1

      I don't think he's saying that we shouldn't, rather that it's already been done to death.

      On the contrary, this article was looking for new things to complain about, it just did a poor job.

    180. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Bassman59 · · Score: 1

      I think it's because the first movies came out in the 70's and 80's aimed at the PG-13 market, and we didn't have major release movies showing endless hordes getting mowed down in the style of Tarentino or Rodriguez back then. Heck, the PG-13 didn't even exist at the time, and a R rating would have probably made Star Wars stillborn. As far as I can recall, the first three movies were completely bloodless. Pretty sure all of them were, come to think of it.

      Shooting a stormtrooper was like shooting a robot; they didn't come across as being "people" on the screen, just faceless, nameless "bad guys" with no emotional impact or graphic violence tied to their deaths. I think if they were creating the stormtrooper costumes today they'd look quite different.

      I agree with this -- and if you think about it, the majority of the big battles in the prequels was against robots.

    181. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by FiloEleven · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem lies not with the stories, but with the label. "Science Fiction" is little more than a new label on "fantasy" that is more acceptable to modern readers. As Gene Wolfe says, "All fiction is fantasy, some is just more honest about it." Most SF except for "hard SF" really does use the fantastic elements as a backdrop for character dilemmas and plot development, exploring the themes of humanity. They are often thought experiments that would be very dry if written in an academic manner but become engaging through the use of a story framework. Even "Hard SF," while generally more focused on the scientific aspects, often contains elements that are nowhere near practically possible in the present, and one could argue that many staple elements of fantasy are equally plausible in the future ("Any sufficient technology is indistinguishable from magic," says Arthur C. Clarke).

      It is undeniable that SF and fantasy have different flavors, but the dividing line between them isn't so much a line as it is a shifting, subjective porous border. They both fit under the label "speculative fiction" which isn't catchy enough to gain traction, and "science fiction" is so entrenched that the genre will probably never get a better label. We just have to keep in mind that "science fiction" is a descriptive rather than a prescriptive term, and that it should be more accurately called "science-y fiction."

    182. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      A 4 inch dagger can easily pierce a sold steel breast plate and instantly kill the bad guy knights.

      While in real life, they just use a crossbow (the medieval assault weapon).

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    183. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The X-Wing's wings aren't designed to be wings in the aerodynamic sense. Their purpose is to spread the laser cannons out a bit. "Lock S-Foils in attack position."

    184. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Bassman59 · · Score: 1

      For example, he has a big go at the Death Star having this glaring exhaust port weakness. Well maybe it's not so easy to design a weapon that generates enough energy to blow up planets that doesn't have a big exhaust port. Not to mention that it's the size of a small moon yet can travel interstellar distances.

      It's the size of a small moon that can travel interstellar distances, yet it takes hours to orbit Yavin so it can destroy the moon with the rebel base. Assuming the Death Star can travel in hyperspace, why can't it come out of hyperspace on the other side of the planet? Or better yet, why not just destroy Yavin first?

    185. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by OldSoldier · · Score: 1

      My complaint about his complaint on R2D2 is that "the voice chip wouldn't get past Accounting". Does he even pay attention to the SW Universe??? C3PO was built by Anakin in his home in his spare time. There apparently are no mega corporations in the SW universe (something I've been meaning to blog about for awhile). So there's no "accounting" to complain.

    186. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

      I think the armchair quarterback TFA is missing the point, parent post has it right.

      Part of the intrigue of starwars is the strange oddities of the design "flaws". It's what makes things unique and interesting, and also plausible. Yeah, R2-D2 looks like a rolling trashcan and can't talk, but somehow it seems plausible. Normal. And the way skywalker looked over the r2 units at the swap meet place and bought r2d2 made it all seem like they are normal every day objects.

      I'm sure a person from 1803 would look at stuff today and point out some design flaws! And we'd say "but that's just how it is!"

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    187. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by prockcore · · Score: 1

      This necessitated a starship as big as a moon to provide the landscape, a trench to fly down to be like the first movie and some suitable target at the end that could blow the whole thing up.

      That's another thing that always annoyed me. It's space. There's no need to fly across the surface of the death star to get to a vent on the other side. Just attack the vent from the other side.

    188. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, there's a good reason for not giving an astromech a voice chip. It makes them seem less human and more disposable. In some of the extended universe stuff, they point out that it's standard procedure to reset the droids' memory to factory defaults between missions to avoid them developing much of a personality. This makes sense, when you consider that they may be required to go outside the ship to effect repairs in the middle of combat and are basically considered expendable. It's a lot easier for a pilot to tell a droid to do something suicidal if he doesn't think of it as a person.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    189. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Darinbob · · Score: 2, Funny

      In the beginning was the word. Then came the sequel.

    190. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Simple - the armour was made a dodgy company giving kickbacks to someone in the totalitarian regime of the Empire :)

      Also it was a 1970s "homage" to crappy 1930s short low budget SF serials that had to raid the historical costume department, with a Kurasowa plot thrown in since Lucas didn't think anyone would notice (just like Elmore's "Snarf" getting put in as the more annoying Jar-Jar later on). Still a fun trilogy of movies.

    191. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you nigsausage!

    192. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by pluther · · Score: 1

      The sheer volume of data in the Death Star plans would have been an untold number of Petabytes.

      You only need Petabytes if you want to map a whole lot of data.

      Did you see how low resolution those images were?

      200k, tops.

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    193. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Mnemen · · Score: 1

      Off topic: I love the sig...nice Sneakers reference.

    194. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Presumably, a gunpowder rifle wouldn't penetrate the armor, which is why the characters use loud and slow firing blasters.

      Why would you use a musket against someone in armor? Any reasonable hunting rifle (and a lot of large caliber pistols) would go right through that stuff.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    195. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      R2-D2

      I believe his primary function is a flight droid so they were built to interface with ships. Not a lot else.

      First of all: why does he even have secondary functions? Why is his full body detachable? Why not just his "head", to be put either in a ship or on any of a wide range of robot bodies?

      C-3PO

      Again, you're overlooking his primary function. C-3PO is a protocol droid designed to serve humans, and boasts that he is fluent "in over six million forms of communication." So he's got arthritis, well, you didn't build him to be flexible or fight. You built him to look pretty and translate. Everything else is bells and whistles. I think he was meant to stand in a corner for some rich merchant or politician and translate any language imaginable. Are you going to tell me that my car is flawed because I couldn't afford a $20 toaster to put in the dash?

      Actually, even then he should be able to both mix a mean Martini and follow his master and a guest leisurely strolling through a forrest with some dignity instead of moving like a Tele-Tubby in a cast.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    196. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the 70's and even into the 80's, it wasn't uncommon for both the military and police forces to have height requirements. I think it was 5'10" for the RCMP in Canada. So no, not odd at all for her to notice that he was a bit short.

    197. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Nah, you give them some PoS that looks good, sounds good, but doesn't really work terribly well.

      I guess Teal'c, um, fixed the staff he carries, because he doesn't seem to have any trouble hitting anything. I've always thought it odd that he didn't switch to Earth's apparently superior weapons until he got rid of his symbiote, but I guess if you pretend his staff weapon is special it sort of makes sense.

      And before someone attacks me, I'm not trying to be anti-SG1. I am a happy owner of the series on DVD.

    198. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      You mean like this? As to why they don't go faster, lots of science fiction universes have FTL drives and sub-light drives and require people to use sublight engines near strong gravity fields (and there is some actual science in special relativity that makes this plausible for certain hypothetical forms of FTL travel).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    199. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by pluther · · Score: 1

      As for the plans, maybe there was an engineer comments that said: /*This is a fatal design issue, will redress later*/ heh.

      When I used to write demos for a bug-tracking system the company I was working for made, I'd have one of the cases be a reported design flaw of "the thermal exhaust vent", showing how to reject a bug report due to the unlikeliness of it ever causing problems.

      I was delighted many years ago to come across a copy of "Star Wars Tales" in which the company that made the Death Stars was presenting their designs to the emperor and he brought it up. They agreed to add ray shielding to prevent mishaps.

      He also asked about safety rails, and they told him "sure, for an extra 20 credits a meter, given 4000 kilometers of catwalks..."

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    200. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Yep - it could certainly be very atmospheric, but it would be quite a different atmosphere than what was achieved in Star Wars.

      As a way of comparing the two atmospheres, look at Firefly (which had no sound in space) and compare it to Star Wars. Very different, I think.

    201. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Organizations can have physical requirements for their conscripts/volunteers. In the Nazi-esque fashion that the Galactic Empire is supposed to be, Germany had hair and eye and heredity requirements for entry into the SS, although of course it doesn't matter if your hair is purple, you won't see it under a full helmet. In a less diabolical sense, NJ State Police had had a height requirement of 6ft in the 1930s, which would have made Luke a munchkin. Also, the US Army requires a height of at least 58".

    202. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by lab16 · · Score: 1

      "Didn't sink the Bismarck but rendered it lame and set the stage for the final surface battle which sunk her."

      Actually, the final battle itself probably didn't directly lead to the sinking, it only maimed it to the point that the crew had to scuttle it. At least it appears that way from expeditions to the Bismark wreckage.

    203. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      OH YEAH!! Explain the fucking EWOKS!!!!!

      When a mommy ewok and a daddy ewok love each other very much...

    204. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by DesertBlade · · Score: 1

      Your forgot that Lord Vader allowed them to escape to find the hidden rebel base.

      --
      Half of writing history is hiding the truth.
    205. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine a historical fiction novel where Napoleon at Waterloo defeated the knights of the Round Table by using the Enola Gay to drop an atom bomb. It's OK because it is "fiction", right?

      You mean like Bill and Teds Excellent Adventure?

    206. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by SBrach · · Score: 1

      You mean the USMC.

    207. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by pluther · · Score: 1
      He got paid to write that?

      I mean, this stuff is fun to discuss, but his article was really just a rehash of points people have been making since the 70's (while ignoring all the popular counterpoints and countercounterpoints.)

      At least he didn't go into how it would be "impossible" for a binary star to have planets around it, which was a popular thing for people to say before we actually found some.

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    208. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by cstacy · · Score: 1

      Why would a slave to a junk dealer need a protocol/translator droid?

      I don't know. Why does God need a starship?
      These things keep me awake at night.

    209. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The storm trooper designs in the first movie were made long before Lucas dreamed up the "clone" idea.

      As with all these quickly made movies, the real reason for the problems are that it was just a story. They were never intended to be hard science fiction. They didn't even bother having internal consistency. They were a re-imagining of class space opera. But you don't hear fans of Buck Rogers explaining why the rocket exhaust floats up in space, yet Star Wars fans seem to be doing the something similar.

      Both sides of the argument are silly in a way. Complaining about R2-D2 is silly since it's just a design imagined at an artist's desk and not by a robotics researcher. Yes, it's funny that a storm trooper armor offers no protection, but it works in the movies. As a pre-teen, the troopers were impressive, exactly what the designer intended.

    210. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

      You don't know certain women.

      "How many times do I have to tell you..."

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    211. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by cstacy · · Score: 1

      But we see another Protocol droid at the start of Phantom Menace, and it's just as physically awkward as C-3PO, unless that one was also built by a kid in the desert, this was the way the protocol droids were designed to operate.

      Radio Shack has outlets everywhere in a galaxy far, far away....

    212. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, it says only the very first Stormtroopers were clones. By the time of Star Wars Episode 4, only about 1/3 of all Stormtroopers were clones, the rest were normal recruits. Since they were doing away with the clones it is logical to conclude that by the time of Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi that none of the Stormtroopers were clones.

    213. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      Battle of Midway to be specific, especially the long shot from the emperor's window.

      The whole movie was a John Wayne WWII flick. Even had Princess leia as Maureen O'Hara. German storm troopers, great "naval" ships, the works. Who could've missed it? And listen to the effects in Episode 1 or 2, can't remember, near the beginning, where the four engine "airline" transport ships are on final approach. They sound just exactly like the old Connies and DC-7s. Very cool, and funny. A little like what they did in "Airplane".

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    214. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      As I recall, the speed in parsecs thing is known as talking bullshit - lots of people say stupid things about stuff they don't understand.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    215. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps there was a height requirement ;)

    216. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by swilde23 · · Score: 1

      ... the future will focus on minimalism and getting one thing right.

      Whatever happened to "a long time ago... in a galaxy far, far away"?

      --
      There are 10 types of people in the world. Those that understand this sig, and those that beat up people who do.
    217. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by aywwts4 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, but he forgot the Hyphen.

      It is not Science & Fiction or Science/Fiction (take your pick)

      It is Science-Fiction, The Science is Fictional!

      You use the premise of fictional science (I can time travel to kill Hitler) and tell an interesting fiction story. The "Science" requirement needs to be something vaguely more sophisticated sounding than "Magic" (in the 50s-70s add an Atomic something, 70-80s add a bunch of wires and exposed grates, LEDs, and grey panels, 90s - present Genetic Engineering/Mutation or Wormholes. The "Science" is merely a conduit to a fictional story.

      --
      Web Developers: Celebrate to our roots! Animated Gifs and Tiled Backgrounds, dont let our history die!
    218. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And why do the laser pistols kick?

    219. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Just to add to your rant, have you ever noticed how just about every science fiction movie shows the engines in the space ships are running all the time? First, it's bad from a stealth perspective. Whatever your engines emit for thrust can be used to detect your presence. Second, it wastes your fuel for no purpose. In a vacuum, you only need thrust to accelerate. Once you are moving at the desired velocity, inertia will keep you moving at the desired velocity until some force acts to accelerate you in another direction.

      Also, this could be what you meant by "They didn't look particularly 'floating' to me as they duke it out in space" but the flight maneuvers are copied from airplanes. Why bank to turn when you can simply rotate and thrust? Think hovercraft rather than airplane. The ship you pilot in the game "Descent" was far more realistic than an X-Wing or Tie Fighter.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    220. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by refill · · Score: 1

      You had me at toaster. I agree, the droids we use today all have their own UI (R2) and trend (golden C3). Personally I think what makes for more "believable" science fiction is when things have kinks and bugs in them - like the fumbling fail-to-jump to light speed sequences - brilliant! Opposite would be when "the bad guy" has the "good guy" in his sights and oh gosh, the gun jams. File that under "spitting water when someone does something really lame and stupid in a tv sitcom" If you want really pathetic, how about those robo-machine-gun suits used in "The Matrix" against [our intelligence] the invaders

    221. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Desler · · Score: 1

      No, there were both the normal Stormtroopers and the scout troopers. Both were having their asses equally kicked by the twigs and stones.

    222. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by ImNotAtWork · · Score: 1

      No it's more like a Far East/Daoism and Bushido. See The Seven Samurai and The Tao of Star Wars

      --
      open source sub sim. I might start coding again for this. http://dangerdeep.sourceforge.net/contribute/
    223. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by KevinKnSC · · Score: 1

      Was it ever supposed to be anything more than that?

    224. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by hardburn · · Score: 1

      It was actually a case of bad acting. The original script material basically lays out that Han thought he was talking to a pair of provincial yahoos who didn't know what parsec was. Obi-wan, of course, was nothing of the sort, and was supposed to react to this obvious misinformation. But since Alec Guinness was just there for the money and didn't care to try, the audience was never let in on the joke.

      This led to the expanded universe trying to explain it away, but the fact is that it was a flaw in the production.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    225. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by element-o.p. · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Done well, the dichotomy caused by an almost silent battle in space combined with visual explosions and radio chatter could make for an intensely surreal and disturbing battle scene, I suspect -- rather like the scene in Patriot Games (I think it was...) where the Special Forces fly into the training camp and kill all the terrorists while the CIA team watches in infra-red halfway around the world.

      Having said that, there wouldn't be a soundtrack in a 100% realistic movie either, but I don't see too many people complaining about that particular flaw in movies...

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    226. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Not necessarily. Wikipedia's entry on the topic suggests that Lucas always meant Stormtroopers to be clones (as per commentary of Episode II)

      You can't believe anything Lucas said after he started pretending Han didn't shoot first. He can edit his own beliefs just as easily.

    227. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by arose · · Score: 1

      It's a small irony that the AK-47, a communist-bloc weapon designed to be the ultimate bargain-basement firearm, was extremely competitive with much more expensive counterparts in the US/NATO arsenal.

      Mr. Kalashnikov and Mr. Zaytsev would probably disagree. It was designed in the forties, was it a bargain-basement firearm in the forties?

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    228. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      R2-D2
        Sure, he's cute, but the flaws in his design are obvious the first time he approaches anything but the shallowest of stairs. Also: He has jets, a periscope, a taser and oil canisters to make enforcer droids fall about in slapsticky fashion -- and no voice synthesizer. Imagine that design conversation: "Yes, we can afford slapstick oil and tasers, but we'll never get a 30-cent voice chip past accounting. That's just madness."

      I believe his primary function is a flight droid so they were built to interface with ships. Not a lot else. John Scalzi seems to suffer from the "must have everything" school of thought and doesn't think the future will focus on minimalism and getting one thing right. Thank god he's not writing software and just another hot air blogger. I reject Episodes I, II & III so I don't know what he's talking about with the oil slick and jets.

      Clearly you missed the boat on John Scalzi, the "hot air blogger' when he wrote a Hugo award winning book and numerous New York Times best sellers for Sci-Fi. Try looking into the guy before unleashing your fanboy scorn, so you can at least make correct fanboy comments.

    229. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Why is it we know a ship is in distress because it's out of proper orientation? "Oh, look! They can't orient themselves to our plane of reference! They must be damaged!"

      Star Trek has the same problem, but it's often much, much worse.

      I remember one episode (was it TNG or DS9?) where the Federation set up a blockade with some sort of sensor beams between each ship so they could detect any cloaked ships trying to sneak through. My first thought was "what if the cloaked ship just goes above, below, or around the "blockade"?

      Ship battles in Star Trek inevitably occur in two-dimensional planes. About the only exception is in the series finale of TNG, the Enterprise E (or whichever one has three warp nacelles, my memory is a bit rusty) takes out some enemy ship or other by "ambushing" it from below the 2-d plane of battle.

      At least Star Wars does most of its battles in three-dimensional space.

    230. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      I believe the main giveaway that stormtroopers are clones is Princess Leia's line ["Aren't you a little short?"]

      Could be a hiring policy---tall people exude more authority, which is kinda' useful if your job includes shooting people who don't subject themselves to your, well, authority.

      I think this clue has multiple interpretations, none of which can be completely ruled out.

    231. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1

      Actually even easier than that - ...give the Jaffa some crappy weapons and constrain their tactics with some deluded "honor" culture, while the parasites keep the cooler stuff and have no tactical constraints. Duh, parasites can crush any Jaffa uprising.

      Give the Jaffa actual weapons and teach them to actually fight... the parasites would no longer have a unilateral position.

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

    232. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      No diseases from dirty telephones?

    233. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by arose · · Score: 1

      Nonetheless JMS managed to pull off a fairly convincing setting with few inconsistencies.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    234. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by VanessaE · · Score: 1
      As I recall, it wasn't 6 million languages... it was 6 million forms of communication, in 3PO's words. See Episode V; when the search droid reaches Hoth and ends up near the rebels' base, its communications channel is picked up by the rebels. 3PO declared at that point that the signals being transmitted by the droid were not something he was familiar with. Since he's a droid, it's safe to assume he can understand data communications protocols just as our computers do, as well as spoken languages, and this seems like a good example of that to me.

      There are plenty of ways for two entities to communicate other than spoken languages, such as visual signals as subtle as simple as body language or as obvious as sign language.

    235. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Also, Chewbacca only visited Endor. He never lived there. That guy was a bad lawyer.

      The whole point of the Chewbacca Defense is that it does not make any sense. Being based on a faulty premise only enhances it. He even says "I am not making sense." The man was a genius.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    236. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "Aren't you a little short for a stormtrooper?"

      Or maybe that's just an allusion to how stormtroopers were only picked from the best in physique. In Episode 4, stormtroopers were meant to be real badasses ("only imperial stormtroopers are this precise"), it wasn't until later that they became the punching-bags of the Star Wars universe.

      The clone troopers angle is pure and unashamed retconning.

    237. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Wikipedia's entry on the topic suggests that Lucas always meant Stormtroopers to be clones

      (tap tap tap...)

      No, actually - the Wikipedia entry suggests that stormtroopers are meant to be made out of ham, and their armor is actually very thin bleached rye bread. Also, they bleed mustard! Fascinating.

    238. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Once you've got control of the galaxy, you don't want an effective fighting force. Who are you going to use them against? What you want is an effective *intimidation* force that is unable to fight effectively against your smaller but more capable praetorian guard. You keep your praetorian guard divided and intimidated by the higher ups too. Everybody in the galaxy is afraid of the guys just above him, except of course *you*.

      Yep, exactly. An effective fighting force is just a force that could be turned against you. You can see the same strategy not just in the SS but also the Republican Guard under Saddam.

      I've also seen a convincing analysis of the recent major military purchases of Hugo Chavez that indicates that they aren't to prepare for an attack by the U.S. as some suspected, but to create and arm a parallel army and air force that would be loyal to him (as opposed to the existing air force pilots who were largely trained in the States).

      I'd never thought about this before in the context of Star Wars but it makes perfect sense. Bravo.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    239. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1

      Don't the mini-chlorides or whatever make it sciency enough for you? Plus, it's got, like, big honking space ships, and I'm sure they had to use some science to build them.

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    240. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      They didn't really expect it to be finished - the superlaser was able to fire and some of the surface defences were online, but it was protected by a (heavily-guarded) shield generator on Endor so structural weaknesses weren't expected to be a problem. While the shields were up, the imperial fleet was pasting the rebels. It wasn't until the shields went down that the Death Star became vulnerable. If the location of the shield generator had not leaked, the exposed power plant wouldn't have been a problem.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    241. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Just what the hell does a moisture farm make anyway?

      You've never read Dune, have you?

    242. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the main giveaway that stormtroopers are clones is Princess Leia's line in IV, as Luke enters her cell in a trooper outfit:

      "Aren't you a little short for a stormtrooper?"

      Because there aren't height requirements to join the army.

    243. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by DCheesi · · Score: 1

      I think that the entire point of the stormtrooper uniform is to emphasize the mechanistic, monolithic nature of stormtroopers. It also makes sense in the context of stormtroopers all being clones.

      If you accept the prequels as canon (a big 'if'), then this makes even more sense. Up until Ep. II, most ground battles were fought by droid armies. In that context, it seems obvious that the Camino-ans dressed up the clones in droid-like armor in order to make their use (and deaths) more palatable. The uniforms de-humanize the clones and thus allow the buyers to 'forget' that they're actually sentient beings. The fact that it also makes them more intimidating doesn't hurt either, especially from Palpatine's perspective.

    244. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by codemaster2b · · Score: 1

      I agree that noise in space is an issue, but the issue of lasers is a bit more complex. Star Wars does not have lasers. Rather it is a form of plasma, much like the matter that makes up a light-saber. Now I suspect that as plasma travels through space it radiates heat and light, much like any other super-heated compound would do in a vacuum.

      --
      And over there we have the labyrinth guards. One always lies, one always tells the truth, and one stabs people who ask t
    245. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Completed? All you can conclusively say from that is that they finished the weapons systems and enough of the computers and engines to make it "operational".

      So, they were stroking their egos by finishing those first.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    246. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by BCSWowbagger · · Score: 0

      Actually, that sounds like some pretty kick-ass historical fiction.

    247. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by PRMan · · Score: 1

      special forces would have shown up at some point in the movies

      The Jedi WERE the special forces. The Emperor killed them all.

      Notice that they did hire Bounty Hunters to track and kill them all.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    248. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Shihar · · Score: 1

      Hey, remember that time on Endor when an entire legion of the emperor's best men were ruthlessly slaughtered by stone aged teddy bears?

    249. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Keebler71 · · Score: 1

      You believe him? Next you are going to say that you believe him when he said that he always knew Luke and Leah were brothers and Vader as his father... Lucas made it all up as he went and BSed that it was all part of a larger vision. Sure he may have had other story ideas and seen Star Wars in the context of a larger universe but with plot holes large enough to drive a Star Destroyer through one must conclude he was just being arrogant.

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
    250. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by OnomatopoeiaSound · · Score: 1

      Wow that would be the awesomest idea ever. I'm stealing it and writing a book based on this.

      --
      +++ Divide By Cucumber Error. Please Reinstall Universe And Reboot +++
    251. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      I believe the scouts (the ones riding speeder bikes) had different armor - and they do in the Battlefront video games - but in the big battle sequence, where the ewoks win with sticks and rocks, the stormtroopers are wearing the same armor as in any other scene from the three movies.

    252. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      If you really want to nitpick, why do they design fighters to require an external loading of astromechs from the outside? Wouldn't it make more sense to put the loading hatch in the bottom so the mech could be winched in on its own?

      I know you don't accept anything Nu-Trilogy. But the Naboo fighters have just such a feature.

    253. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by HeavyAl · · Score: 1

      It makes perfect sense now! C3PO was directly in line for being one of the most powerful and manipulative beings in the galaxy! Think about it for a second; Anakin was actually (unknowingly perhaps) creating an automaton version of his future master! 3PO being a master at reading and understanding not only spoken language but also digital forms of communication and even body language would be the perfect tool for manipulating the unsuspecting populace! Who would ever think a droid capable of such machinations?

      Seriously though, the 6 million forms of communication was always pretty straight-forward I thought. I sure wish I had a system that had such capabilities as such a thing would make data conversions from one application to another trivial at most.

    254. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by DCheesi · · Score: 1
      Don't stop there:

      Lightsabers Yes, I know, I want one too. But I tell you what: I want one with a hand guard. Otherwise every lightsaber battle would consist of sabers clashing and then their owners sliding as quickly as possible down the shaft to lop off their opponent's fingers. You say: Lightsabers can slice through anything but another lightsaber, so what are you going to make a hand guard out of? I say: Dude, if you have the technology to make a lightsaber, you have the technology to make a light hand guard.

      Just because the light-blade doesn't extend out to protect the hand doesn't mean that the EM(?) force-bottle doesn't. There could very well be an invisible hand-guard-field there, designed just to prevent this kind of move. Maybe such a swelling in the containment-field is even a natural and necessary feature to properly contain the light-beam near the base of the "blade".

    255. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, pilots have to be below a certain height because of blood circulation. A shorter pilot can withstand more G forces without blacking out than a taller pilot can because there is less distance for their blood to travel.

    256. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by xdroop · · Score: 1

      Science Fiction without the science is fiction. Laser guns and space ships do not science make. If they'd gone to explain a bit how some of this stuff worked, it would qualify more to me as science, but Luke's light-saber is no more explained than Gandalf's staff. Star Wars would better be classified as Fantasy.

      --
      you should read everything on the internet as if it had "but I'm probably talking out of my ass" appended to it.
    257. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason she says this is that the conscripts has specific height/weight ranges to meet to become stormtroopers. This is because they only want to make armor in one size due to the cost savings.

    258. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by bigngamer92 · · Score: 1
    259. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Mikeytsi · · Score: 1

      The explanation for this was that they're all clones in the "first" series, but by episode IV, attrition has lead to the need for conscripts that were non-clones. The vast majority of the troops would still be the clones though.

      --
      I've been called a "Fucking Dick" by better people than you.
    260. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by borgboy · · Score: 1

      [...] but he sure thought up some neat ideas for a universe that John Scalzi will never come close to.

      That's pretty unfair.

      Scalzi may not have had the mass-market success or big screen treatment of Lucas, but turning senior citizens into killing machines is one of many 'neat' ideas. Have you actually read him?

      --
      meh.
    261. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The French legionnaire uniforms with the red are their dress uniforms. They don't wear that when fighting in the desert.

    262. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, but when he introduces Luke to the lightsaber, Kenobi says it's not as "random as a blaster". Maybe they have different settings, like the phasers on Star Trek:

      "Hey, we have them outnumbered 10 to 1. Let's make this interesting, set blasters on Random!"

      --
      Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
    263. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by statusbar · · Score: 1

      Yes, in fact for some time now, over 20 years ago, jet fighters utilized Head Transfer Functions (HTF's) to provide three dimensional audio to the pilot. So wherever the pilot is, and wherever his orientation, he would "hear" where the enemy was located, but the distances were scaled to make them sound closer.

      --jeffk++

      --
      ipv6 is my vpn
    264. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by roguetrick · · Score: 1

      C-3PO is completely incapable of sign language.

      --
      -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
    265. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by ComputerGeek01 · · Score: 1

      90% of shots fired in gun fights miss, even when the shooter is a cop, and even when they aren't supposed to miss.

      You must live in LA.

    266. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by roguetrick · · Score: 1

      I saw the cut starfighter sequence in stray dog. It was AWESOME.

      --
      -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
    267. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Except during the Revolutionary War when they saved your sorry colonial asses.

    268. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't reject episodes I, II & III... well you can I suppose that's your choice, but according to Lucas that's cannon. The extra crap is extra crap. If you reject cannon then your argument applies to whatever you make up and not Star Wars as it was created by the creator.

      How do you know C-3PO was designed to stand in a corner? Why does it have any arms and legs at all? Also, how does it communicate effectively when some cultures use non-verbal social cues? He can't truly interface with other cultures when he can't properly bow or salute among other things... can he even shake hands?. Would you agree that proper protocol requires more than just speech?

      Your argument about the 2nd Death Star is correct... but what about the open shaft straight to the core of the first death star? You'd think they'd at least put some kind of screening or filtering system... maybe a twist or turn of some kind.

      The speeder? It travels rather fast... maybe inertia works differently in that universe.

    269. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by bckrispi · · Score: 1

      Death Star An unshielded exhaust port leading directly to the central reactor? Really?

      The exhaust port was shielded.

      DODONNA: Only a precise hit will set up a chain reaction. The shaft is ray-shielded, so you'll have to use proton torpedoes.

      And even then, there was concern that it would even be possible to hit the exhaust port.

      WEDGE: That's impossible, even for a computer.

      RED LEADER: Negative! It didn't go in. It just impacted on thesurface.

      WEDGE: My scope shows the tower, but I can't see the exhaust port! Are you sure the computer can hit it?

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    270. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      I am surprised no one mentioned the ATAT's, sure they may have a purpose but sending them down to a snow planet when you could quite easily use something with tracks ?

    271. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by meta+coder · · Score: 1

      RD2D=ReaDy 2 Die

    272. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      The Word: With a Vengeance.

      This time...(*random van explosion*)...it's personal.

    273. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by jbezorg · · Score: 1
      --
      I've lost all my marbles except one & It's fun to test angular & centripetal acceleration in my skull
    274. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      And if you designed a small space vehicle that travels at the speeds the X-Wing move at, you would design them to 'bank' instead of just fl;ip arund. That would kill people.

      What? How? Huh?

      Bear in mand they ahve effectively mastered gravity in the SW universe. That shanges a lot fo things.

      Uh, yeah, it makes "banking" even more silly.

      And for the love of FSM, work on your typing. How can anyone make 6 typos in 4 sentences?

    275. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell hath no fury like a fanboi's scorn.

      Or a woman's scorn for sega.

    276. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and also exports to remove waste. Much like how our modern New York City survives.

      So that's how New Jersey came to be!

    277. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Korin43 · · Score: 1

      R2-D2
      Sure, he's cute, but the flaws in his design are obvious the first time he approaches anything but the shallowest of stairs. Also: He has jets, a periscope, a taser and oil canisters to make enforcer droids fall about in slapsticky fashion -- and no voice synthesizer. Imagine that design conversation: "Yes, we can afford slapstick oil and tasers, but we'll never get a 30-cent voice chip past accounting. That's just madness."

      I believe his primary function is a flight droid so they were built to interface with ships. Not a lot else. John Scalzi seems to suffer from the "must have everything" school of thought and doesn't think the future will focus on minimalism and getting one thing right. Thank god he's not writing software and just another hot air blogger. I reject Episodes I, II & III so I don't know what he's talking about with the oil slick and jets.

      His argument is clearly directed towards episodes I, II and III. You can't just respond to that with "na na na I can't hear you". In the context of the new Star Wars, R2-D2's lack of speech doesn't make any sense. Why would you put rockets and tazers on a droid and not put a speech synthesizer?

    278. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Wargames · · Score: 1

      Lucas wanted to steal the bombing sequence from the Dam Busters and needed a plausible reason to recreate that.

      Reminds me of the "Smile you son-of-a..." scene from Jaws

      --
      -- Each tock of the Planck clock is a new world and here we are still life. --
    279. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by lennier · · Score: 1

      "ruthlessly slaughtered by stone aged teddy bears?"

      If you touch down on the sanctuary moon
      You're sure of a big surprise...

      'Cause today's the day
      The cannibal bears
      Have a picnic!

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    280. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the plot makes sense and the universe remains consistent about it's own rules...

      Logic 1:
      Obi wan is not a liar

      Obi wan said Darth Vader killed Luke's father

      Therefore, I can ignore everything after the first movie

      Logic 2:
      Ignoring most of Star Wars makes one less of a nerd

      Non-nerds have better chances to get laid

      I get horizontal on a regular basis with a fabulous babe

    281. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr. Kalashnikov and Mr. Zaytsev would probably disagree. It was designed in the forties, was it a bargain-basement firearm in the forties?

      It wasn't exactly bargain basement but being made of stamped steel and cheap wood it was certainly designed to be cheap and easy to mass manufacture as were most Soviet weapons. The AK is also very rugged, I've seen footage of African tribesmen fixing a bent AK-47 barrel by bashing it straight... well... straight-ish with a rock and then firing the thing. There is no weapon I'd trust with my life more than an AK and that's the AK-47/104/etc... that fire the good-old and nasty 7.62mm full power round that shoots through brick walls and tree trunks, not the new ones that are chambered for the 5.45 mm pussy round. I predict that the AK in one form or another will still be around a hundred years from now. Oh, and Zaytsev wouldn't touch an AK which is too inaccurate, he used an M91/30 bolt action rifle.

    282. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you trying to be redundant when you say "otaku fanboi" or are you talking about someone who idolizes and obsessively follows japanese fanboys?

    283. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, technically Storm Troopers and the Empire had only been around for 20 odd years by the time of Episode IV. At that point they wouldn't have had major battles, especially not in guerrilla situations, so yeah, they probably went for appearance during parades and so on rather than fighting in places where stealth would be desirable.

      In the books, it's mentioned that Storm Trooper armor following Endor was given variation in colors for fighting in multiple environments. Something about getting fucked up by Ewoks caused the Empire to wake up to how terrible their armor was. Still didn't fix the helms I believe.

    284. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alec was the best actor in the cast. His eye-roll said more than Lucas's cumbersome verbiage ever would have.

    285. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by metlin · · Score: 0, Troll

      If I remember correctly Asimov even went into figuring out how much it would take to keep a planet-city like that running - it was rediculous amounts of imports and exports on a daily basis just to keep things from falling apart.

      Ridiculous, not rediculous. Retard starts with re; ridiculous starts with ri.

    286. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      R2 is a Sith Lord.

      Always two there are... master and apprentice.

      Which means... oh my God...

      3PO!

    287. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this on Slashdot, then? This is some obscure blogger/columnist deliberately singling out a movie with a sizely fanbase, using a controversial headline and nitpicking at inconsequential details to draw attention.

      You can do that with any single movie out there, including 2001 which was pretty damn near accurate. They just are not made to be accurate. They are made to entertain. And, lo, I was entertained.

      It's not even that the guys writes badly, he just writes about nothing of consequence at all. Someone should pull out the cork.

    288. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      4. Deathstar Escape Scene - Troopers miss every shot at the group of rebels who are going to lead them to the rebellion base...hmm, could it be they were ordered to miss?

      Deathstar Destruction was an inside job!

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    289. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by kid_oliva · · Score: 1

      The problem with this is sci-fi classics like "Time Machine", "Invisible Man", and "Journey to the Center of the Earth". They do not practice science but take one aspect of reality and change it. The argument that everything has to be scientifically sound is bogus, especially when dealing with something that only exists in the writers mind. I love to read Isaac Asimov, but we won't know how scientifically accurate he was until we have such technologies. It is about the story being told and always has been.

      --
      I eat Karma for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. That's why I don't have any.
    290. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      Sarlaac: It's just an ant-lion magnified to a colossal scale. The ant-lions around my place seem to be doing fine. If you're going to nitpick it, ask why being digested over a thousand years is such a big deal. Shouldn't you suffocate upon ingestion? Doesn't make much difference to you what your corpse is doing after that.

      Maybe it evolved some way to keep its prey alive, like parasitic wasps, in order to lay eggs in it, or slowly feed of something its prey produces.

      Yeah, think of it, how do sarlaacs reproduce? "Man, being stuck in that Sarlaac sucked! How long was I in there for? Can't believe I ever made it out. Gosh, I hope I can make it back to town... feeling woozy... suns are *so* hot... Overwhelming urge to dig a pit and crawl in...."

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    291. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by no.good.at.coding · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Aren't you a little short for a stormtrooper?"

      That doesn't necessarily require the stormtroopers to be clones. Most (if not all) armed forces have some sort of height and weight requirements.

    292. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) R2D2 is not minimalistic. Jets, Tazer, Periscope! It has everything but a kitchen sink and a copy of Microsoft's voice synth software.

      2) C3PO is a gay robot that is eligible for social security for being 80% physically disabled. R2D2 is a more practical translator droid if you add a voice synth! C3PO cant write! he cant pick stuff up and has trouble holding thinks handed to him. He is the worst secretary robot ever.

      3)seriously, they had a vinyl hanging sign strapped to the wall that said 'put bombs here'. not done? Thats like building a sky scraper and putting the a keystone on the first floor at the corner of a block and painting a dollar bill on it. no sh*t someone is going bring the whole thing down.

      4)ok, I agree on this one. maybe it does have seat belts but luke is a farm boy and would be caught dead wearing a seat belt.

    293. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      I disagree. If the science is not real, then the story doesn't deserve to carry the name "science". There is no room for magic or make-believe in the world of Science, because science is based upon reality.

      Put another way, just because Lucas retold his King Arthur-like tale in the future, instead of 1500 years in the past, doesn't change the fact that BOTH are fantasies. King Arthur is not science fiction, and neither is Star Wars.

         

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    294. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 2, Informative

      As far as I can recall, the first three movies were completely bloodless.

      Almost correct. A New Hope was the only one to show blood. Obi-Wan cut off that arm in the cantina.

      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
    295. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by GospelHead821 · · Score: 1

      Stephen Colbert would approve of the term "sciencey fiction."

      --
      Virtue finds and chooses the mean.
      Aristotle, Ethica Nichomachea
    296. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>Phoenix metro area where I live, there's a bunch of smaller cities like Mesa, Chandler, Scottsdale, Glendale, Peoria, etc., which are all part of the same metro area.
      >>>

      That's just a minor example. According to the Census Bureau, the entire region from New Hampshire's southern border, through Boston, NYC, Philadelphia, Baltimore, and Washington, is one gigantic urban zone. A continuous city that follows the I-95 corridor. It hasn't quite reached Richmond but I suspect in 20 years that too will be part of the northeast megaopolis.

      Asimov predicted this would happen in the 50's Caves of Steel, where Balt-Wash are one city and Philly-New York-Boston are another. They are kept separate for administrative purposes, but could just as easily merge into one unit.

      One thing Asimov did not predict is the energy drought. When oil becomes scarce, I think we'll see a rapid downsizing of human population, simply because it will be too expensive to ship food from distant regions, and people will starve. Those that survive will tear-down buildings and grow food locally. The depopulation will be similar to the depopulation that happened to Rome after the empire fell.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    297. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Trogre · · Score: 1

      I don't really know about clones, but the conscript thing was definitely there from the beginning. Luke, after all, was set on joining the Imperial Academy. This is spelled out more clearly in the deleted ANH "Biggs Tells Luke About The Rebellion" scene (which also interestingly enough allures to the Empire being somewhat socialist).

      With Lucas' revisionist view of history I'm less inclined to believe what he says these days :(

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    298. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      TVTropes has a formula.

    299. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Asimov predicted this would happen in the 50's Caves of Steel, where Balt-Wash are one city and Philly-New York-Boston are another. They are kept separate for administrative purposes, but could just as easily merge into one unit.

      Personally I think the State boundaries should all be redrawn so that these metro areas are separate States, and don't span State lines (like with Chicago-Milwaukee, the the examples you pointed out). There's a cool website about this if you Google "38 States".

      One thing Asimov did not predict is the energy drought. When oil becomes scarce, I think we'll see a rapid downsizing of human population, simply because it will be too expensive to ship food from distant regions, and people will starve. Those that survive will tear-down buildings and grow food locally. The depopulation will be similar to the depopulation that happened to Rome after the empire fell.

      Yep, this is a little worrying, but it seems to me that new energy sources are going to be found before disaster strikes: solar is becoming more and more viable all the time, nuclear hasn't gone anywhere, and if worse comes to worse they could build a solar plant on the Moon. After all, even in the worst case, most land-based energy could be supplied by nuclear plants (in addition to hydroelectic, which is tapped out in North America but not in developing countries), and then the only thing oil is important for is transportation. Given enough cheap energy, things like jet fuel can be created from other materials, and cars can be run from batteries recharged from the grid, or from fuel cells which can be powered by all kinds of things.

      Frankly, I'm more worried about human overpopulation (without a giant energy restriction) causing other major problems, like environmental destruction which will have all kinds of unforeseen effects. Imagine a world where all our food is created artificially, and foods like wild-caught fish are a distant memory, and we all have to live indoors 24/7 because the weather outside is completely unliveable (this, coming from someone living in Phoenix).

    300. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by fitash · · Score: 0

      Yeah .... but how do you justify that lightsabers do not posses a Wii motion-like wire strap???? I'm sure that Yoda f***** his plasma tv several times

    301. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure why people bother to nit-pick on things that were already explained in the movie. Doesn't anyone remember the pleasant little conversation between Moff Jerjerrod and lord Vader where Vader explains that he's there to put the construction of the death star back on schedule and Jerjerrod complains that the Emperor is asking for the impossible and he needs more men? We're talking about a station that was being thrown together into an operational state before it was really ready, to be used as a trap. Half of it was missing, for crying out loud. Plus, it was supposed to look like an attractive target. The imperial troops getting it "fully operational" were doing so under the watchful eye of management that has a policy of "force-choke executions will continue until morale improves" and implements it with fervor. Faced with management like that, if they're asked: "is the station fully operational as I have commanded?", they say "yes my emperor, fully operational". Then they pray that the spit and baling wire holding the place together lasts long enough for the emperor to leave and for them to get it working properly.
      A wonderful example of this is real world product demos. Marketing demands a product to demo and you provide one. Sure it's a thrown together piece of crap. Getting something that looks good before you're even done designing it kind of requires that. There was a funny Dilbert strip on this. The pointy haired boss remarks that the product demo went very well and that they've already sold some units, and how soon can they be delivered and Dilbert explains that, since the product demo was just their competitors product with the label ripped off, it may be a while. If the PHB actually killed people for failing to meet impossible demands, Dilbert would make up a number, then scramble to somehow scam his way through it in the background.

    302. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by dakohli · · Score: 1

      Almost?

      Within the commonwealth it IS legendary. As a member of the Canadian Air Force, I can assure you this action is well known, and considered most extraordinary.

      -Flexibility is the key to Air Power. The key to flexibility? Indecision!

    303. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by meowhous · · Score: 1

      He wanted to make something nice for his mommy? It's just a stupid plot point, so that Tahei and Matashichi I mean R2D2 and C3PO get introduced into the story early so that when everybody gets together in the 1st movie / 4th episode, it all seems fated, cosmic, blah, blah, blah.

    304. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, tjhe Zat guns are stated to be what teh Jaffa use when fighting each other

    305. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      Did he ever state in the prequels that he was a protocol droid, or display a talent for translation (I can't remember any, myself)? Don't forget 3P0 got his memory wiped at the end of episode 3, so it's likely he was repurposed as a protocol droid at that time and given his 6,000,000 forms of communication in a download.

      I did just realize that 3P0 tells Luke soon after they meet in Episode 4 that he's not good at telling stories. Flash forward to Episode 6 as he tells the Ewoks all about their adventures and he seems to have gotten quite good at it somehow.

    306. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      The scary part is that all of your examples have come true exept for the current sci-fi example.

      I therefore welcome our Futuristic, Mutigenically Engineered Wormhole Travelers!

    307. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Logic+and+Reason · · Score: 1

      Personally I think the State boundaries should all be redrawn so that these metro areas are separate States, and don't span State lines (like with Chicago-Milwaukee, the the examples you pointed out).

      Having driven between Milwaukee and Chicago several times, I can tell you they are not part of the same "metro area".

    308. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      The way those suits fit together, how the hell could you make yourself shorter while wearing it? They look to be built like a suit of armor!

    309. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Tyrannousdotnet · · Score: 1

      are you saying that there is a material intrinsically invunerable to the most powerful laser on earth? light and inexpensive enough to armor the whole military in? we are trying to run an empire here. Besides those things are clones, and we have forced draft on all empire planets.

    310. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you remember Jerjerrod complaining that the emperor had set an impossible deadline? It was only "fully operational" in the sense that it could fire the superlaser. Even then, I doubt that it was up to the task of destroying a planet yet, although it could probably take out any other space vessel in existence with one shot. There were probably supervisors and engineers all through the thing praying that their hastily cobbled together kludges wouldn't fail until _after_ the destruction of the rebel fleet. Because if the superlaser stopped firing before that, the station would have been fine because of the force field from the planet, and the remainder of the rebel fleet would have had to run away, but the emperor would have had every last person possibly responsible for the failure, plus plenty who were not rounded up and probably executed them himself, painfully and slowly.
      This is one of the problems with ruling through fear and intimidation. You don't get honesty, you get people doing whatever it takes to make you happy, which it turns out it's easier to do by lying. Ever have an overbearing boss who made your job difficult to do and rode you all the time? It can be much easier to mislead them to keep them happy while you actually get your work do by, for example, telling them that you've finished the task that they're personally obsessed with while you're still working on task B when you've actually finished task B, but are working still working on the task they're obsessed with. It can save you from having to spend 25% of your time making useless status reports and time estimates instead of getting your bloody work done. Obviously this can backfire rather badly. On the other hand, if the consequences of not having the task done "on time" are just as bad as for lying about having it done on time, such as execution by force lightning, then people will typically lie and do the best they can to cover their asses.
      As for R2 droids, I'm pretty sure the communications problem is a social issue, not necessarily a technical one. It could also possibly be economic, the model that talks back could cost more (and no arguments that it's technically trivial to make the droid talk and therefore the cost should be negligible please or I'll start asking how much Vista Ultimate costs compared to Vista Home Premium). The social issue seems to be more significant though. Remember that the Mos Eisley cantina doesn't allow droids. The barkeeper was quite hostile to them. Now, Tatooine is the styx, and outright bigotry tends to be more heavily concentrated in those areas, but it still seems that cybernetic organisms are not even second class citizens in either the empire or the republic before it. They're subservient tools, made to fulfill a function. In other words, it may make people uncomfortable if things they would prefer to think of as tools talked. Maybe people don't want to have to think about the fact that their slaves might actually have thoughts and feelings. It's fairly standard procedure in the star wars universe to periodically wipe droids memories to get rid of quirky emergent behaviors. If you look at the droids that do talk in the Star Wars universe, it's either droids that really need to in order to fulfill their function or it's droids working for people who probably have different social prejudices. For example, Jabba the Hutt keeps all kinds of slaves, uncomfortable reminders that his droids might be able to claim status as sentient beings isn't going to bother him. He has droids tortured, after all, he's probably much happier if they can beg for mercy and express pain. So, I think utility-class droids don't talk as a general rule. They report via computer interfaces or through protocol droids. Astromech droids probably fall somewhere near the line. They're utility droids, but the ones in starfighters also function as flight computers, so they communicate through the cockpit computer, but they're in a class where many people probably don't think it's appropriate for them to have a voice. So, they just hav

    311. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by aywwts4 · · Score: 1

      Name one _Popular_ Sci-Fi story which contains events entirely within the realm of current scientific understanding, where accredited and respected scientists would sign off their seals of approval endorsing it's scientific veracity.

      And no, finding me an obscure book most people have never heard of does not count.

      --
      Web Developers: Celebrate to our roots! Animated Gifs and Tiled Backgrounds, dont let our history die!
    312. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it weren't for your handle you'd be my hero. :D

    313. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I haven't driven between them (I've only been to Chicago), but I imagine it's a lot like the difference between Scottsdale and west Phoenix here in the Phoenix metro area. The two are totally different in character, but they're close enough to be part of the same metro area. More importantly, they're a lot more like each other than the rural parts of the state. I do know that a lot of Illinoisans don't appreciate that Chicago dominates the state politics and sets all the laws. It'd make much more sense to create a separate state with Chicago, Illinois, and northern Indiana (including Gary), and then leave the rural parts of those states separate.

      The same definitely goes for New York. NYC bears no resemblance to the rest of New York, but because of its huge population, it sets all the laws statewide, even though geographically it's tiny compared to the rest of the state. The two should be separate. Let NYC join with northern New Jersey (specifically Newark) and Connecticut into a single state.

      Meanwhile, there's a lot of too-small states in the union, left over from colonial days. Delaware doesn't need to be separate from Maryland. Rhode Island doesn't need to be separate from Massachusetts or Connecticut. Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine should just join into a single state; maybe they could even join up with Nova Scotia and/or New Brunswick. Do South and North Carolinas still need to be separate, or North and South Dakotas?

      This may sound silly, but politics are extremely affected by borders, which is why many politicians engage in gerrymandering. In addition, government is expensive, and streamlining it, by eliminating unnecessary political districts, would eliminate a lot of overhead and cost in government. 38 States wouldn't need as many tax dollars to administer as 50 states. And with today's economic climate, tax dollars are drying up and need to be saved.

    314. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I think the opposite giveaway is from the same movie: a bunch of storm troopers are going through a doorway, but one is too tall and mashes his face on the door baffle.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    315. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind, though.. in episode IV, they wanted the princess to escape, to lead them to the rebel base. It wouldn't do for her driver to get deaded before she even left.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    316. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Lightsabre was named but not invented by Lucas. I first read of the concept in some 1950s SF novel (don't recall which one) -- a sword or knife with a "retractable" energy blade.

      Poul Anderson postulated that hand weapons (glorified swords or the like) are a good idea for battles inside a starship: you don't want guns going off that could penetrate the hull or trash the controls courtesy of someone's bad aim or a ricochet in a firefight -- then you're ALL dead and it no longer matters who wins the fight. So -- something with only arm's reach penetration, even if it's an energy blade, is a lot more sensible inside a ship or starbase.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    317. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Reziac · · Score: 1

      True, but the thing had a diameter somewhere in the 200 to 500 kilometer range, depending on whose estimates you believe. So if you didn't happen to be able to approach it from the right side to start with (and I don't suppose it kindly lined itself up as the Rebels wished) then you might as well orbit til you get to where you need to be.

      Besides... no braindead approach path, no kewl drama as we fly down the trench.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    318. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Today we've got special microphones and radar that can tell the secret service exactly where a gunshot came from

      That seems like a waste of money. What is the Secret Service going to do if the bullets that created the report weren't counterfeit?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    319. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by ilmandi · · Score: 1

      Imagine a historical fiction novel where Napoleon at Waterloo defeated the knights of the Round Table by using the Enola Gay to drop an atom bomb.

      Sounds like my last game of Civilization IV

    320. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you serious? That, in your opinion is the main giveaway that Stormtroopers are clones? I'm guessing you've never heard of height requirements.

      Many military or militaristic organisations (think police forces) used to have minimum height (and weight) requirements for there front-line personnel. These have largely been done away with now due to discrimination issues, but when you're a galatic warlord, emperor or general all round bad guy, i figure you can set height requirements for your troopers.

    321. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the punchline.

      "Those of you that have come up against us, and you know who you are, know how effective these weapons (the P90s, etc.) are in combat."

    322. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      To be fair, they're not lasers, they are "blasters."

      They are supposedly bolts of hot gas, magnetically projected. Kind of like a railgun that fires a glob of plasma.

      This both explains the lack of speed AND the visibility in vacuum.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    323. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and doesn't think the future will focus on minimalism ...

      Wasn't this a "long time ago" in a galaxy "far, far away". Or something like that...

    324. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Culture20 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sorry, but Clone Troopers had an accelerated aging cycle. They're all dead by Episode IV. Boba Fett is the last remaining clone of Jango.

    325. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      I'll stick to my rule of thumb: anytime a character draws his sword (e.g. light saber in the presence of more powerful weaponry), or the main character is associated with a dragon, that's fantasy (or maybe space opera), not sci fi.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    326. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      George Lucas isn't a god but he sure thought up some neat ideas for a universe that John Scalzi will never come close to.

      Do you even know who John Scalzi is? Maybe you do, and you just don't think much of his work, but the way you write this it sure sounds like you are unaware that John Scalzi is a highly popular, multi-award-winning science fiction author who packs each his novels with more imaginative ideas than George Lucas has had in his entire lifetime.

    327. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly, you've never heard of the forest moon of Endor.

    328. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Pop the DVD in, crack a beer, and watch the film. Anytime you feel the nihilism of deep criticism threaten to overcome the movie, take a sip. Fanbois are well advised to keep several crates of ale on hand.

      Good to know you've got lots of beer on hand.

      See my kids love those films. They thing the Ewoks are cute and Jar Jar is funny. Maybe you're too old to be watching them.

      Best pop out to the liquor store now, before it closes.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    329. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      As someone said to me after quoting some obnoxious but funny football chant "I'm not a football fan, I'm a football fan fan".

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    330. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How come when two ships meet in space they're always facing right-side up?

      I believe in episode IV, the Rebel's waskawy (a la Elmer Fudd) maneuvers end up causing two star destroyers or super star destroyers to cross at 180-degree on their roll axis to each other. But just to help make your point, it was clearly a very bad thing for the start destroyers involved.

    331. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      4. Deathstar Escape Scene - Troopers miss every shot at the group of rebels who are going to lead them to the rebellion base...hmm, could it be they were ordered to miss?

      But then why does Leia, guessing they are bugged, fly directly to her base?

    332. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by darthvader100 · · Score: 1

      But Coruscant was not designed by Lucas, but by Timmothy Zahn.

    333. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> As far as I can recall, the first three movies were completely bloodless.
      > Almost correct. A New Hope was the only one to show blood. Obi-Wan cut off that arm in the cantina.

      Don't forget the wampa in SW:ESB - it bloodies Luke's face and munches his tauntaun!

    334. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That French Foreign Legion uniform you are refering to is dress uniform. They wear DPM out in the field!

    335. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      Having said that, there wouldn't be a soundtrack in a 100% realistic movie either, but I don't see too many people complaining about that particular flaw in movies...

      Very good point.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    336. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Assuming that the ships in Star Wars have cheap power to spare (which there's a lot of evidence for), then it makes sense to keep accelerating until you reach the point that you need to decelerate, so yes, you could see them running all the time. Of course, half the time, they'd be pointing into the direction they're travelling in order to slow down and I don't know Star Wars well enough to say if that's ever been shown, but it wouldn't have to have been.

      As to why you'd bank instead of just rotate in place, well it's not a universal argument but at the speeds they're sometimes going, banking might impose less stress on a person that simply snapping round so that your body thinks it's going in a different direction? Okay - that one might be a bit of a stretch. How about it's harder for people to shoot you if you're varying your flight path all the time. Most of the space ship scenes in Star Wars involve combat, yes?

      Anyway, I think this whole thread is just the Slashdot editors realising their page hits and ad-revenues are down a bit today and so deciding to run yet another piece of Star Wars flamebait, so I'm going to leave it there. A lot of justifications can be made up for a lot of the behaviour that seems illogical at first. It's just an exercise in scientific consideration. :)

      Regards,
      H.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    337. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      1984?

      --
      bickerdyke
    338. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For Leia, remember that the imperial forces said "No lifesigns, probably a malfunction" or something like that. This shows that she KNEW they would go after the people quickly. This also makes sense. It's much easier to tractor a pod and have a squad of guards as you bring them into your various bays, one at a time than to prevent egress, and have to corrall everyone through unfamiliar corridors with possible "intruder countermeasures" and hidey holes. The capability of creating "intruder countermeasures" is shown by the training droid and the interrogation droid.

    339. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      Oh, well, I'm not stupid. Tons of things in the SW universe make absolutely no sense. The storm trooper uniforms are stupid, kind of remind me of French Legionnaire uniforms that always made me laugh when I saw someone dressed like that in the desert. The red flags on your shoulders make you stick out like a sore thumb regardless of where you are.

      Um, that's the dress-uniform. Or are US Marines fighting dressed like this. I can see that sword being handy in modern battlefield....

      The actual combat uniform of the Legionnaires is the same as regular French military uses. You can see some pics of those here

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    340. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by skine · · Score: 1

      And yet Tarantino is applauded for Kill Bill.

    341. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ehrm, every freaking asimov story?

    342. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by L0rdJedi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not necessarily. Wikipedia's entry on the topic suggests that Lucas always meant Stormtroopers to be clones (as per commentary of Episode II) and has an uncited comment by Lucas that some Stormtroopers were clones and some were conscripts. I believe the main giveaway that stormtroopers are clones is Princess Leia's line in IV, as Luke enters her cell in a trooper outfit:

      "Aren't you a little short for a stormtrooper?"

      I believe the main give away that they aren't clones is that they all have different voices in IV, V, and VI and that Lucas is full of shit. Contrast that with II and III where they all have the same voice, because in Lucas's world, accents aren't learned, they're genetic.

      FYI, the "uncited" comment is probably from the Insider where Lucas essentially made an excuse for why StormTroopers in the original trilogy were all different shapes and sizes with different voices and the ones in the PT all looked the same. Seriously, watch the Death Star docking bay scene or even just the first interrogation scene with Vader and the captain of the Tantive IV. All the troopers are different sizes. Lucas made the excuse and then left it up to the EU authors to fix because he couldn't be bothered to.

    343. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by L0rdJedi · · Score: 1

      I think it's because the first movies came out in the 70's and 80's aimed at the PG-13 market, and we didn't have major release movies showing endless hordes getting mowed down in the style of Tarentino or Rodriguez back then. Heck, the PG-13 didn't even exist at the time, and a R rating would have probably made Star Wars stillborn. As far as I can recall, the first three movies were completely bloodless. Pretty sure all of them were, come to think of it.

      ROTS is the one and only Star Wars movie to ever receive a PG-13 rating. It's also the only one whose acronym is perfect for it and the rest of the prequels.

    344. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comparing FFL uniforms with Storm Trooper uniforms? Come on man...

      Those uniforms aren't actually in use anymore in the desert or elsewhere except for garrison (sp?) & parade duties. Once upon a time they were used, yes, but with a lot of modifications if we're talking about desert use (sun protection to the neck and other notable differences).
      Do I really need to remind you that the standard uniform for one of the world's greatest empires was RED (hence the term red jackets)? This was supposedly to hide demoralising blood stains (lol'ed), btw.
      Or that americans were called gringos (green-go) because they had bright green uniforms (which was far from camo green)? Later they had blue & grey uniforms?

      Anyhow, that all really doesn't matter, I'd say. Star Wars is retro-futurish in a lot of aspects (planetary royalty, emperors, swords,...). Judging by our history, bright colored uniforms aint entirely without precedent.

      Not that I like Storm Troopers much. Best to come out of Star Wars franchise was X-Wing, Tie-Fighter, etc games. ;)

    345. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Jarik_Tentsu · · Score: 1

      That being said, it does seem like the Empire relies highly on numbers in their average military force.

      I mean take the Imperial Navy. Tie Fighters don't have hyperdrives, don't have shields and don't have missiles...just lasers and a cockpits. They're not amazingly maneuverable like an A-wing - they're just cannon fodder. Enough to keep civilian vessels in line, or overwhelm enemies with numbers.

      Now sure, good pilots got to fly in Tie interceptors, and then Tie Advanced fighters, or later in the books, Tie Defenders - both of which came with secondary weapons, higher maneuverability, shielding and hyperdrives. It certainly seems like for the Navy, expert flying isn't so necessary to be a TIE pilot. I'm sure those that are good graduate to more elite squadrons.

      I'm sure its the same thing with Stormtroopers. Most of them are meant to look intimidating to the civilian population, and be used in numbers against enemies...while the good ones probably go into more specialized and elite positions. As someone else mentioned, the Storm Troopers used in the attack on Tantive IV seemed pretty leet. The ones in the Death Star purposefully let the rebels go to track them. And yeah.

      Of course, you can always can point holes in Star Wars universe. Like it always annoyed me how in the first Death Star...a massive space station only housed like one squadron of TIE's. I mean c'mon, the Rebels should have attacked and been swamped by thousands of TIE's like they did in the second Death Star battle. I mean something like the Death Star, presumably is more than just something to blow up planets (A minimalist version was used in the book Darksaber, where they just had the firing mechanism). I'd imagine it's meant to be a mobile fortress - self sufficient with the ability to hold vast majority of troops and fighters. Consider that even a Victory-class Star Destroyer has more than that. Most likely being on a budget and lack of CGI is the reason why. =P

    346. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I believe the main giveaway that stormtroopers are clones is Princess Leia's line in IV, as Luke enters her cell in a trooper outfit:

      "Aren't you a little short for a stormtrooper?"

      ... you think she was referring to his height??

    347. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by rikkards · · Score: 1

      I completely agree, it had been a long time since I had seen 4-6. The last time I had seen Jedi was in the theatre when it came out so when I did see them again I realized I had put them on pedestals and was looking at them with the perception of a 7 year old. But that perception had been expected to be the same when I saw them again and I was severely disappointed.

      At that point I realized, they are no better plotwise (let alone the dialogue is pretty cheesy) than Ep 1-3 and the only thing that made it stand out was the level of special effects at that time. Now they look chintzy but back then they were the shiznit.

    348. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 1

      One thing that might be important to remember is that we see troopers shot and incapacitated, but sometimes they could be merely wounded. The other thing is that the armour might provide other functions such as a short-term environmental protection suit, HUD and communication links. The ironic part is that Mr. Scalzi probably added some of these functions to the colonial trooper uniforms in his Old Man's War books.

      And you're right that the real purpose of the design was to dehumanise them. The heroes could shoot and mangle them with abandon, and the audience wouldn't feel pity.

    349. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by feargal · · Score: 1

      The storm trooper uniforms are stupid, kind of remind me of French Legionnaire uniforms that always made me laugh when I saw someone dressed like that in the desert. The red flags on your shoulders make you stick out like a sore thumb regardless of where you are.

      You have, of course, realised that that uniform is for ceremonial purposes, and not the battledress used in actual combat situations?

      Here's an example of the not in dress uniform:

      http://www.legion-2reg.com/modules_media/photo/2_5_02052009_232705.jpg

      --
      "A goldfish was his muse, eternally amused"
    350. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It's still accellerating you, but in an angular way. If done hard enough it would give your spine a heck of a twist.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    351. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Or at the very least, start charging up the weapon earlier so it's loaded when you do get in range.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    352. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Like Mega City 1 where Judge Dredd lives.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    353. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Pikoro · · Score: 1

      And Princess Leah was menstruating while swinging over the canyon in the death star with Luke. Pause the Laser Disc sometime during that swing. There is blood... :p

      --
      "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
    354. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      38 States wouldn't need as many tax dollars to administer as 50 states.

      But you'd have to redo all the flags, and more to the point do 38 stars make a nice pattern? I was in a bar discussion with some people once about if some dependency/territory like Samoa or Costa Rica were to be admitted how much it would cost to sew an extra star on. Obviously I can't remember what our estimate was.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    355. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Graywolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Cool idea, I'd mod interesting!

    356. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by dajak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There is a rational explanation for everything. Let me shed some light on the history of the stormtrooper armor, light saber, and blaster.

      The storm trooper armour is actually based on a brilliantly designed reactive armour that stops any high velocity projectile, laser, electroshock, you name it. When it was invented it rendered its wearer invulnerable to all weapons used in those days. Moreover it is, due to the addition of a hard outer layer, also invulnerable to the stabbing and slashing weapons that briefly dominated the battlefields after its invention. Besides it primary function as a battlefield armour, it maintains body temperature and recycles waste products of metabolism. The sensor array and hud built into the helmet are also impressive. The suit has done a brilliant job of keeping its users alive for centuries, although effective countermeasures have significantly reduced the advantages of wearing it over time.

      The blaster and light saber were developed as an answer to this armour. Both are low velocity weapons that don't trigger reaction by the armour. The other somewhat effective way to attack the armour is simply with a blunt object or one's hands or feet in the hope of knocking out its occupant.

      Since all weapons that are effective against the armour can in principle be dodged because of the required low velocity, there is still a valid case for using them in order to discourage the development and use of other weapons. The empire has therefore remained committed to them. The rebels prefer to walk around unencumbered, which also has some advantages and is moreover cheaper. For the empire this is obviously hardly a reason to change the standard issue weapon for storm troopers, since opponents could always choose to don armour.

      The helmet hud is keyed to the eyes of its owner. That's why Luke was practically blind while wearing one. Its sensors are moreover very biased to detecting people wearing similar armors, and certain kinds of technology. This is one of the reasons why the rebels don't use it, and why storm troopers have hardly any advantages over them. Since a variety of countermeasures exist to avoid detection, the empire has basically given up on tuning the helmets for specific classes of enemy. The helmets, just like the armour, do however do an effective job at limiting the options of the enemy.

    357. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      As for the plans, maybe there was an engineer comments that said: /*This is a fatal design issue, will redress later*/ heh.

      Damn defense contractors ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    358. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by seeker_1us · · Score: 1

      But how intimidating is body armor that can't stop a slingshot held by a teddy bear?

    359. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by meyekul · · Score: 1

      But Luke's X-34 speeder on Tatooine? The Yugo of speeders, man. One hard stop, and out you go.

      Why does he expect a harder stop in a floating vehicle, and how would it be any different than a convertible car? This article is barely funny, and only thought-provoking in the sense that you think of the ways in which it is wrong.

    360. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Isaac Asimov's Robot novels (Caves of Steel, The Naked Sun, et cetera). Hardly obscure.

      Robert Heinlein also wrote an interesting novel, which unfortunately I've forgotten the title, but it was about a generational ship traveling to our nearest star. It was extremely-accurate sciencewise, even excluding the possibility of warpspace, such that the maximum speed limit was lightspeed. It took the ship approximately 50 years to reach the closest star, and I loved that he used that level of realism.

      Do authors sometimes mistakes, like when B5 author JMS claimed Jupiter had a temp of -500 celsius? Sure. I can overlook such things, but when an author goes so far as to ignore science completely, then he's no longer writing a science story. He's writing futuristic fantasy - King Arthur and his knights, but moved to the future. I prefer stories that are grounded in reality such that I can say, "Yeah that might happen someday."

      I can say that about shows like 24 (terrorists might try to nuke L.A.), and I can say that about Asimov/Heinlein's stories listed above, but cannot say it of Star Wars or Star Trek which often commit acts that are *known* to be impossible.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    361. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except you're puposely leaving out the other movies. In Empire and Jedi, the stormtroopers get into long fire fights with the rebels and they can't aim worth crap. Ex. The fight scenes from Cloud City and the battle of Endor.

    362. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>Personally I think the State boundaries

      That's roughly-equivalent to saying the European Union Parliament should redraw the boundaries between Spain, France, Germany, and Italy. It's not going to happen because the states are proud of their heritage and want to remain the way they are now - as separate, self-contained, self-governing entities. As example Massachusetts and Pennsylvania are almost 500 years old. They like being the way they are now and don't want change.

      One change I would like to see is California divided into North and South California, because no one state should control 1/3rd of the electoral votes needed to select a president, but I doubt it will ever happen.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    363. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by isorox · · Score: 1

      "Why did you wear those funny-looking things on your heads when you were riding bikes?"

      What, baseball caps? Keeps the sun out of your eyes. Beanies? Keeps your head warm.

      If you're on about the polystyrene cups that some people wear, I assume they're better at keeping you warm? There's no safety benefit, and in many cases they'll cause more damage.

    364. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>it seems to me that new energy sources are going to be found before disaster strikes

      I doubt it. The new sources like solar and wind cannot produce enough energy to replace all the oil-sourced energy. At best they can do maybe 1/10th and that's an optimistic projection. 1/20th is probably closer to the truth which means we will HAVE to live in an energy-poor society... just like our ancestors did.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    365. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      AI and psychohistory?

      really?

    366. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why was a wookie living on endor?

      He was a squeaky toy seller, and the market with Ewoks was the best in the Galaxy! :-)

    367. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by ThomsonsPier · · Score: 1

      The other main advantage, of course, is that you don't have the pay the actors as much if you can't see their faces.

    368. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by RedHat+Rocky · · Score: 1

      Maybe no blood, but lifting a man by the neck and then breaking said neck is pretty nasty.

      Yeah, I'm looking at you Vader, you want some?

      --
      Anything is possible given time and money.
    369. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a point you should note:

      As someone who used to work for the Police (as a civilian) and used to train people (as part of the job) to shoot rifles, I can tell you that a LOT of cops are NOT good shots. [Capitals for emphasis].

      They may be trained and have to pass to a certain degree, but most certainly don't fit under the term 'good marksmen' (or women for that matter).
      My boss at the time (who was a Police Officer) was often ridiculed for her inability to hit a target with any accuracy (she only passed shooting by the skin of her teeth each time she was tested). This was actually due to her being left eye dominant but right handed. She refused to learn to shoot with her left hand as it required learning to reload her weapon etc left handed. I, on the other hand, am also left eye dominant and right handed, but I learned to shoot left handed.

      As someone who knows that the average police officer is an average shot, it comes as no surprise that they miss when firing under pressure. [And don't get me started on the ones who accidentally shot themselves in the foot or burned their legs whilst trying to get their guns out of their holsters!]

      I can't speak for Storm Troopers as I've never trained them, but I assume they would be better shots than cops (seems as most are clones of Jenga Fett), but your points are pretty valid as reasons for their 'apparent' poor marksmenship.

    370. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by DigitalReverend · · Score: 1

      I always assumed, that since Darth Vader had become half man, half machine, that he was able to link into the Storm Trooper's uniform to see what was going on, give direct orders, and to basically receive a constant feed of tactical information.

      --
      I read Slashdot for the headlines, because the headlines, unlike the articles, are usually original and never duplicated
    371. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      I think he is referring to the fact that the "armor" wasn't very good at stopping anything from Ewok thrown rocks to laser and blaster fire.

      As a uniform I would say it was successful in that it was scary looking, but it seemed like it might as be made out of tinfoil (which actually may have been more effective).

    372. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Also like any action type film the "professionally trained" soldiers seem to have a hard time hitting the broadside of a barn from within the barn. I always sort of laugh inside when Ben and Luke go back to find his parents killed and Ben says "Only Imperial stormtroopers are so precise", I sort of imagine he is saying it sarcastically...

    373. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      ...so your saying its no good against small arms?

      me = going to hell. :)

    374. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Thank god he's not writing software and just another hot air blogger."

      Unless it's some other John Scalzi... I'm pretty sure that blogger is a very accomplished sci-fi author himself...

      http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=john+scalzi&x=0&y=0

    375. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by rawls · · Score: 1

      By the same logic, the term "detective fiction" gives the author license to totally ignore standard procedures and techniques used by detectives, the term "military fiction" allows the author to totally ignore military tactics and strategy

      Yes. Do you think all detectives are like Poirot, The Continental Operative or Sherlock Holmes? Do you think the Tiger Generals depicted in the Three Kingdoms actually used military tactics such as I'll-hold-back-this-entire-army-single-handedly-with-my-super-human-fighting-ability? Most of the best works of historical/science/detective fiction take plenty of liberties because the details of what did/would actually happen make for dull reading.

    376. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by mdarksbane · · Score: 1

      Actually, speaking of that... are there any WWII movies you can think of that have dogfighting scenes as fun as those in Star Wars?

    377. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by neutralino · · Score: 1

      "Aren't you a little short for a stormtrooper?"

      I always interpreted this as suggesting there was a height requirement for the ones who enlisted

    378. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Goa'uld are all about pomp and ceremony. Their #1 goal is to be adored as gods and live a life of luxury with the trappings of power. They engage each other in highly ceremonialized combat.

      This is why Anubis does so well against other Goa'uld. He doesn't care about ceremony and pomp. He builds efficient and cost-effective weapons that get the job done. It's also why Anubis was an extremely boring villain.

    379. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by rgarbacz · · Score: 1
      You hit the nail.
      In the Star Wars universe things are built for purpose, without bells and whistles. Things get broken, rusty, look creepy, sometimes are not finished, or have some design flaws. Poor people wear simple closes, have simple equipment, and robots with visible cables. Floors get dirty and have to be cleaned. One great SF writer would have said that in SW universe people go to restrooms. That is why it is so realistic. Realistic in the sense of portraying a civilization, where people are still people just using advanced technology, a technology which is still limited.

      Of course there are funny or not logical things, there are mistakes Lukas made, but far from most he is accused for. Even more, most of the stuff is explained in the movies. But when people just do not listen carefully plus do not have to much idea about engineering than it results in wasted electrons, e.g.:
      • a robot designed to repair and control other machines, looks like one, and has equipment to e.g. grease a joint if needed.
      • they still have to convert fission heat to electricity somehow, if they use steam generators (why not) they still have to face emergency situations with too high pressures, so still they need some vents to let it go to space in case, and considering the size of the Death-Star, the reactor, and the same the needed vents have to have their capacity, please read the description of the Chernobyl catastrophe - it was steam which exploded
      • as for the protection of Death-Star with these "too big vents", it is said explicitly in the movie, that the commander of the station was so keen to report to the emperor about his victory over rebellion, that he decided to leave behind the major protecting fleet (i.e. not waiting for it), I believe that the Death-Star, as modern cruisers was designed to operate in battle groups, when it is supported by smaller ships

      Someone can say that because the Titanic, which supposed to be unsinkable, did sink, or World War II bombers had "blind" spots, or our TVs do not have a GPS embedded, than our Universe has major design flows, because who would design a bomber which can be shot down - it makes no sense. I would say that the need for a protocol droid to win a 100m sprint run is the same as having a GPS in my TV.

    380. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by aywwts4 · · Score: 1

      Something tells me no scientist is going to sign off on Hyperspace travel (Hundreds of lightyears in moments) as you yourself admit, praising Heinlein for excluding it, however this is the basis of Caves of Steel and the Naked Sun and the foundation for being able to tell stories about expatriated earthlings on other planets.

      It's a good story, based in Fictional-Science, because traveling for 500 years would have been boring.

      However I don't have experience with Heinlein and cannot argue about that one way or another.

      --
      Web Developers: Celebrate to our roots! Animated Gifs and Tiled Backgrounds, dont let our history die!
    381. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      But you'd have to redo all the flags, and more to the point do 38 stars make a nice pattern?

      I'm sure they could come up with something. I'm pretty sure there was actually a time in American history where there actually were 38 states (like in the early-mid 1800s). There's a Wikipedia article, I think, showing the evolution of the US flag. There's been a LOT of changes, with many versions of it only lasting for a couple of years because new states were being added so quickly. Apparently they didn't worry too much back then about how much it cost to change flags. It wasn't even that long ago we had 48 states instead of 50, and there was a brief time we had 49.

      I was in a bar discussion with some people once about if some dependency/territory like Samoa or Costa Rica were to be admitted how much it would cost to sew an extra star on. Obviously I can't remember what our estimate was.

      It wouldn't cost much of anything: most of the "cost" would be borne by people who want to buy new flags. The government would only need to buy a few new ones for the government buildings like at the capitols and the post offices. The PO could probably pay for theirs by suspending mail delivery for a single saturday. I for one don't care about getting my junk mail that quickly, so that's fine by me.

      BTW, Costa Rica is an independent country, not a US possession at all. They'd probably a little annoyed to hear you say that. You might be thinking of Puerto Rico, or even Guam or the Northern Mariana Islands. Besides, Costa Rica I hear is a pretty nice country, and not all screwed up like most other Central American countries. We should leave them alone so we don't get them screwed up. All the countries we meddle with down there usually have all kinds of problems.

    382. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      That's roughly-equivalent to saying the European Union Parliament should redraw the boundaries between Spain, France, Germany, and Italy. It's not going to happen because the states are proud of their heritage and want to remain the way they are now - as separate, self-contained, self-governing entities. As example Massachusetts and Pennsylvania are almost 500 years old. They like being the way they are now and don't want change.

      Don't say that to the people in the Basque region, or they'd probably beat you to a pulp. I'm sure they'd be quite happy to have a region carved out of both Spain and France, where they straddle the border, and made into their own separate country.

      What about the people in the Alsace-Lorraine region of France? You sure they don't want to be part of Germany? After all, before WWII (and also before WWI), they WERE part of Germany. Germany lost that region when they lost WWI (and took it back again, and lost it again after WWII).

      You say the people like the borders the way they are, but I'm not so sure. Borders have been redrawn many times, sometimes in recent history. People in the middle of the countries might not want change, but their opinions aren't important. What's important is the people in the regions which might be changed. Do they want to be part of State/Country A, or State Country B, or an entirely separate State/Country? Every group of people should have the right to self-government, and not be forced to have their territory controlled by people living in a different region. Do the people of Staten Island really like being Manhattan's garbage dump? Maybe if they were allowed to secede from NYC or NYS, they might stop taking the garbage.

      One change I would like to see is California divided into North and South California, because no one state should control 1/3rd of the electoral votes needed to select a president, but I doubt it will ever happen.

      Absolutely right: California SHOULD be split up, into 2 or even 3 regions. Back in the 1800s, there was a movement to form a new state from northern California (north of the bay area, what's now "wine country"), and call it "Jefferson". I think it's a great idea. That region bears no resemblance to the rest of CA, and is more like Oregon and Washington. There's been a movement since the 1800s for those regions to secede from the USA, and join with British Columbia, part of Idaho, and southern Alaska and maybe part of the Yukon Territory, and form a separate country called "Cascadia". I think this is a great idea too.

    383. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they've mastered gravity, meaning they can cancel out inertia, then there's no reason at all to limit starfighters to low G manoeuvres.

    384. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by rgarbacz · · Score: 1

      Maybe because on the planet full of smugglers, thieves, etc. the only parts he could have get for free were protocol droid parts.
      Do you remember whose slave he was? Do you think the guy like him would throw out a not broken robot part not from a protocol droid?
      Or maybe being born as a slave he dreamed about being powerful someday, maybe it was the part of his dream he could afford to have. After all he became one of the most ruthless dictators one can imagine, so it had to have some roots, it is pity it was not shown in the movie.

    385. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by evel+aka+matt · · Score: 1

      Pattern Recognition?

    386. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THUMP.

      THUMP.

      THUMP.

      You know when there are AT-ATs around. And the Empire is all about intimidation. Their height lends visibility, and also tactical capability - though you'd think they'd be able to coordinate with satellite AWACS. And AT-ATs don't fill the same role as tanks, they're very heavy armoured personnel carriers.

      You're right that they aren't especially capable in battle, but the Empire never expected to face any resistance that couldn't be quashed by Star Destroyer orbital fire.

    387. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

      Space Opera, an important term.

      Originally, when the first space operas were written, they were based on certain assumptions based on the then current level of scientific knowledge about how space travel would work in the future. They were Science Fiction adventure stories, but they didn't totally lack credibility.

      In fact, there are two important distinctions in Science Fiction that we need to get out of the way. Fantastic stories that use speculative science to add credibility to their fantastic stories are one type of science fiction, and stories that are explorations of scientific trends are another, and there isn't a clear distinction between them.

      Anyway, Space Opera, in time, became a popular meta-setting for stories. Science moved beyond Space Opera, but it had proven a popular setting, it didn't get let go of just because FTL travel seems a bit impossible at the moment. So, while it occaisionally gets a fresh coat of paint and some new spark plugs, the fact that it is no longer a scientifically probably setting is not a reason not to write, read and enjoy the odd space opera.

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    388. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe he also didn't want to show humans gettings shot up in a movie kids would watch. I remember him talking in one interview about how the fully armored and masked people would not be as scary to kids.
      When I was a kid, I thought the stormtroopers were robots, having seen the movie when I was 4.

    389. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the quote is "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." I don't care enough to look it up, but I'm pretty sure

    390. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by winwar · · Score: 1

      "Star Wars would better be classified as Fantasy."

      And fantasy set in space is referred to as science fiction these days. Arguing about the definition of science fiction is about as useful as complaining that the term hacker is misused.

      Certainly entertaining though...

    391. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by winwar · · Score: 1

      "Most modern readers, it seems, can't handle something by Hugo, Dickens, or a number of 19th (and before) century writers because it's "long" and "boring" and there's no "action," etc."

      Well, if I want entertainment, I generally don't want boring. Considering the success of movies that are action crap (Transformers), I suspect most people agree.

      Movies are visual and sound based and will cater to those aspects. This is in addition to the divide between "entertainment" and "serious" subject matter. Frankly, I (probably like most others) don't enjoy the "classics"; they are something to be endured while learning.

    392. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by lumpenprole · · Score: 1

      Right, and how do they grow it?

      Unless it's an unusually uh, moist, area, you'd get the same thing with water collectors anywhere there's a settlement and no need to pay a farmer plus transport it. It didn't look real wet around that farm.

      --
      Disclaimer: MINAA (Mummy! I'm Not An Animal!)
    393. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>Something tells me no scientist is going to sign off on Hyperspace travel

      Actually LOTS of scientists have signed-off on hyperspace travel. Just not for people or other large objects, since we'd be torn-apart, but there are lots of wavicles/strings that can travel faster than light. So the theory is there, even if we haven't figured out the reality quite yet.

      30 years ago when I got my first 1 megahertz computer, the idea said computer would eventually shrink to the size of a watch seemed pretty farfetched too. But I knew it was theoretically possible given enough time to work-out the design.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    394. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      OK, OK, in the Commonwealth coutries, it is legendary, and east of Germany, it is fairly well known as well. ;-)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    395. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Magic5Ball · · Score: 1

      Babylon 5 was respected and aided by NASA JPL. SeaQuest had support from NOAA. The Mission to Mars series on Discovery had good backing from a variety of scientists, as had their previous dinosaur holodeck series.

      --
      There are 1.1... kinds of people.
    396. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by aywwts4 · · Score: 1

      The backing of scientists for PR and awareness reasons and complete scientific veracity are two very different things.

      SeaQuest featured a talking dolphin as a central character let alone individual episode plot points (I recall a sunken Ghost ship).

      Babylon 5 is just ridiculous "Mind War: A rogue telepath with exceptional powers takes refuge on Babylon 5, and two PSI Cops arrive to capture him." their physics were good (JPL's endorsement), the rest of the aliens and interstellar travel is highly unlikely. ...and the Discovery series was more of a semi-documentary than Sci-Fi, there wasn't a fiction story if we are talking about the same program.

      Again this doesn't question the quality of the program, just the fact that the science is largely fictional and that is a GOOD thing, real science is boring, we live in the world of real science, its not that exciting of a place, going to another planet is expensive and time consuming, aliens would likely be completely incapable of communicating with us, and for the most part, the universe is pretty damn empty.

      SciFi is great because the universe can be whatever it wants to be, however I do appreciate when it stays within the realm of basic sub-light Newtonian physics (Space ships don't need constant propulsion to continue moving)

      --
      Web Developers: Celebrate to our roots! Animated Gifs and Tiled Backgrounds, dont let our history die!
    397. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The government would only need to buy a few new ones for the government buildings like at the capitols and the post offices.

      I thought every classroom had at least one?

      And indeed I did get Puerto Rica and Costa Rica mixed up. How you could think I meant Guam is a mystery.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    398. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by bami · · Score: 1

      What? Almost every star trek battle happens in 3D Space. Spock even mentiones it in The Wrath of Khan: Khan supposedly fought from a 2D point of view, so Kirk lowered the ship, and got behind them.

      For the other battles, you see fly-by's almost every time where they fly over and hit the hull, fly under and hit the bottom or some other random point.

      That episode you were talking about happens in Enterprise for sure, but they made a 3 dimensional net around a certain point to find a cloaked ship.

    399. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Khan supposedly fought from a 2D point of view, so Kirk lowered the ship, and got behind them.

      I always found that scene somewhat amusing... they outfox Khan by 'lowering' the ship and letting him pass by, then unnecessarily 'raise' the ship again to re-engage him in the same 2D plane!

      I think it would have been cooler to see them rotate Enterprise, and watch for Reliant to "drop" through their field of view.

    400. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

      In this case, there is absolutely no reason NOT to design them with ...

      Um, cost?

      He is a communications droid that cannot do sign language and does not understand body language, nor communicate good body language

      So what? If you need something translated, you want the words, not the body language.

      Body language is 90% of all communciation

      Yeah... What is my body language saying right now? Oh, you can't tell? Wow, 90% of my communication to you was just lost it seems! Looks like no one is really communicating over the internet, eh?

      In other words, you're trying to do exactly what the author said Star Wars novelists have had to do - try to explain the poor design choices.

      That's assuming that design choices in the real world are actually always good. But it isn't. Due to various limitations like cost, you often/usually have to make compromises.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    401. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      That episode you were talking about happens in Enterprise for sure, but they made a 3 dimensional net around a certain point to find a cloaked ship.

      Now I'm going to have to go figure out which episode it was and watch it.

      For the other battles, you see fly-by's almost every time where they fly over and hit the hull, fly under and hit the bottom or some other random point.

      Well yes, but that's not quite what I'm getting at. The ship flying under the other ship is still oriented in the same direction, as if the ships were orienting themselves according to some cosmic plane of reference. Only very rarely do you see a ship come at another ship like the Enterprise E did in TNG's finale.

    402. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      then unnecessarily 'raise' the ship again to re-engage him in the same 2D plane!

      And that's sort of what I was getting at. They're all working according to some 2D plane of reference, and only rarely do they actually do anything outside of that plane.

    403. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't, really. I was just giving some more examples of U.S. Territories that many Americans don't realize are U.S. possessions.

    404. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by hitmark · · Score: 1

      how about fangrl?

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    405. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by hitmark · · Score: 1

      another option is that rather then being the cause, they are a "byproduct".

      as in, greater force ability results in more of them showing up, rather then more of them showing up result in greater force ability.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    406. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah, but the same is true if you bank first. The only way to avoid snapping your spine from too hard of a twist is not to twist too hard. So that still makes no sense.

    407. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, never seen such a fan of SW, putting so much energy in the survival of the SW universe.

      You didn't defend the hand guard on laser sabers (man, the guy has a real point here), the exhaust port on the Death Star, the asteroid worm (which feeds on vacuum apparently).

    408. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think lots of police and army bodies have min/max requirements for things like height and weight. It may be simply that Luke was shorter than the average accepted stormtrooper.

    409. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      What if the dragons were geneticly engineered from smaller flying creatures, and the swords are due to a collapse of advanced society formerly capable of things like energy weapons and interstellar travel?

      That's essentially what happened in the Pern universe. You start out thinking you're reading a fantasy book, and several books later realise that all this time you were actually reading SF.

      My rule of thumb: Any genera distinction that can change retroactively with a bit more information about the universe doesn't really exist.

    410. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      Err...this is total twaddle.

      First off, he created the SS before he took over the country and before he rebuilt the military (from next to nothing).

      Secondly, they were to protect him not from the military, but from the SA. (If you think politics in a democracy is rough, you don't even want to look at a despotisim).

      Thirdly, this "ineffective" fighting force nearly conquered all of Europe by itself. I'd hate to see them put together something you consider effective.

      You really shouldn't get your history from Hogan's Heroes reruns.

    411. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by schon · · Score: 1

      Lucas always meant Stormtroopers to be clones

      Yeah, just like he always meant for Greedo to shoot first.

    412. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by pugugly · · Score: 1

      Feh - most of it he's dead on right about, but he has forgotten one fundamental.

      Rule of Cool trumps all!

      {G} - Pug

      --
      An Invisible Entity of Vast Power whose existence must be taken on faith alone: Liberal Media
    413. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Camouflage is a recent fad. Most uniforms designed prior to the 20th Century were designed to identify rather than conceal.

      Consider that in aerial combat, it was only 15 years ago that "low-viz" markings were considered important - and that during an age where visibility plays the smallest role ever during an engagement.

      TWX gets it right - the point of the stormtrooper uniform is to emphasize the both the stormtrooper and the Empire.

      Or, perhaps, the white plastic blends in with the white walls of a space station. Whatever.

    414. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by carlzetie · · Score: 1

      I see you didn't defend the Storm Trooper armor...

      Oh, well, I'm not stupid. Tons of things in the SW universe make absolutely no sense.

      Like, the whole plot, for instance? Instead of dragging two droids in and out of firefights, why don't they just email the Death Star plans to the rebel base? Or upload them to a bunch of torrent servers?

    415. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like, the whole plot, for instance? Instead of dragging two droids in and out of firefights, why don't they just email the Death Star plans to the rebel base? Or upload them to a bunch of torrent servers?

      A couple three points:

      1. it's safe to assume the Empire has control over, or at least can monitor, electronic networks in the Star Wars universe.

      2. They did email the plans, to Princess Leia on board the Blockade Runner. To quote Darth Vader: "Several transmissions were beamed to this ship by Rebel spies. I want to know what happened to the plans they sent you." She was bringing them to Obi-Wan on Tatooine.

      3. Presumably the Rebel base doesn't have an e-mail address, for security reasons.

  2. Oh dear by FTWinston · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let's not even go near the idea of light beams being slow enough to dodge; that's just something you have let go of, or risk insanity.

    I think by the time you're writing an article about design failures in Star Wars ... you're already beyond just the risk of insanity.

    1. Re:Oh dear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually the blasters are ionized gas if i remember correctly. also it is a story meant to entertain see it as that.

    2. Re:Oh dear by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, they're never referred to as 'lasers' or similar in the films. The books describe them as ionized gas throwers, like the PPGs in Babylon 5. In fact, if they were coherent light beams you wouldn't be able to see them, the only reason you can see them from the side is that they are projectiles that are glowing.

      Turbolasers, on the other hand...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:Oh dear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are the same technology scaled up immensely. Turboblasters just doesn't roll off the tongue the same way, so they acquired a different name.

    4. Re:Oh dear by ACMENEWSLLC · · Score: 1

      I hate when an entertainment show attempts to entertain me by explaining how technology works. Star Trek often over explains technology and builds that into the plot. I enjoyed shows like Star Wars and FireFly more because they leave it to the imagination.

      I have the book on the Star Trek universe technology. What makes sense, what doesn't. It's entertaining. But I don't want the show to explain in 30 minutes how to do something so trivial when all they have to do is beam an air bubble into the heart of the ships crew. Don't explain, leave it to my imagination.

    5. Re:Oh dear by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Hey, don't insult the insane! They're not THAT desperate! :P

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    6. Re:Oh dear by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Star Trek often over explains technology and builds that into the plot.

      As big a Star Trek fan as I am, I am often angered by the vast sciency inconsistencies that are blatantly plot-driven. For example, let's look at Voyager when they had the Slipstream drive installed.

      The benefit: "If it works, we get home really soon."

      Their problem: "We can't use this for more than $DAYS at a time or the ship will fall apart."

      Their solution: "Let's uninstall it."

      A much better solution: "Let's use it until it's too dangerous, then repair the ship, then use it again, then repair the ship, and so on, until we get home, have Star Fleet scientists look at the tech, make it work right, and then suddenly we're on top of the travel speed game again."

      I have similar quibbles with most of Voyager, despite it being the ST series I grew up watching (along with DS9).

      Regarding Firefly, I watched it for the first time a few weeks ago and loved it.

    7. Re:Oh dear by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      As long as we're nitpicking lore... turbolasers are just really big blasters. The "laser" part of the name is just a linguistic holdover. They still fire packets of ionized gas.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    8. Re:Oh dear by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 1

      More like plasma heated almost to the point of fusion. The "bolt" travels through a heated corridor produced by the laser, shedding mass (and light) as it travels.

  3. Re-cutting by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think giving George Lucas access to the raw footage was a poor design choice.

    1. Re:Re-cutting by MrNemesis · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I happen think giving George Lucas access to the star wars prequels was a poor design choice :)

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    2. Re:Re-cutting by Anonymous+Cowar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Worst design decision ever: Letting George Lucas have access to the Star Wars IP after the mid 80's.

    3. Re:Re-cutting by hal2814 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, because during the 80's he was doing such a good job with the Star Wars IP...

    4. Re:Re-cutting by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because during the 80's he was doing such a good job with the Star Wars IP...

      What do you mean 80s? He jumped off that cliff in 1979.

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    5. Re:Re-cutting by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Yeah, because during the 80's he was doing such a good job with the Star Wars IP...

      What do you mean 80s? He jumped off that cliff in 1979.

      Oops, that should have been 1978.

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    6. Re:Re-cutting by mrdoogee · · Score: 1

      To be fair, in the 80's he was (mostly) ruining the Ewoks... and as they say on the interwebs: "And nothing of value was lost."

    7. Re:Re-cutting by Chapter80 · · Score: 1

      Poor design choice:

      E=Episode Number
      n=Release Sequence Number

      E= ((n+2) mod 6) + 1

    8. Re:Re-cutting by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      I happen to think, George Lucas was a poor design choice. :)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    9. Re:Re-cutting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ewoks in ROTJ = jumping the shark .. and landing in the shark pool

    10. Re:Re-cutting by Landshark17 · · Score: 1

      I think giving George Lucas access to anything beyond pre-production brain-storming was a bad idea. The Empire Strikes Back was absolutely brilliant and considered by many to be best of the original trilogy. It was directed by Irvin Kershner and written by Lawrence Kasdan and Leigh Brackett. It packed alot of important story in good and tight without over-loading the film and what's more it had romantic scenes that you could watch without cringing. Giving Lucas anything more than executive producer has proven to be the worst thing that could possibly happen to both the Star Wars and Indiana Jones franchises.

      --
      This sig is false.
    11. Re:Re-cutting by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that the one where all the cast members were on cocaine? I remember something about that from a Carrie Fisher interview.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    12. Re:Re-cutting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't that the one where all the cast members were on cocaine? I remember something about that from a Carrie Fisher interview.

      Do you blame them?

  4. council by hey · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The council chamber where they debate laws seemed crazy to me. Everyone is floating in their own flying saucer. Just because you can doesn't mean you should. Regular tables with chairs make more sense. More compact and you have a chance to interact with the other representatives.

    1. Re:council by Abreu · · Score: 4, Informative

      The whole point, I believe, is that the chamber is gigantic, and that representatives really needed to fly to get to the center and speak.

      If you allowed people to just do a videoconference from their seats, what's the point of meeting in Wash^H^H^H^H Coruscant? Everybody could stay at their home planets and telecommute!

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    2. Re:council by GameMaster · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Never underestimate the need to be grandiose just for the hell of it, especially when it comes to government. The US congress could meet in a high-school gym, but they chose to build the massive, ornate, capital rotunda instead. For that matter, the same goes for the open pits in the Emperor's thrown room. Even if you didn't claim that it hadn't been completed yet (since the station was supposed to be incomplete at that point), perhaps he was going for a grandiose, and in this case intimidating, look with huge, bottomless, pits.

      --

      Rules of Conduct:
      #1 - The DM is always right.
      #2 - If the DM is wrong, see rule #1
    3. Re:council by microTodd · · Score: 1

      I always wondered how seating was arranged. By importance? Size of your constituent population? What about the poor shmoe senators at the very, very top or very, very bottom? What a crappy seat.

      --
      "You cannot find out which view is the right one by science in the ordinary sense." - C.S. Lewis on Intelligent Design
    4. Re:council by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      They don't meet in the rotunda. There are separate meeting rooms for the House and Senate. The rotunda is open to the public and is adorned with art work. It doesn't really have a function beyond being a tourist attraction. And have you ever been in the room where the House meets? It's tiny and nothing at all like the massive Senate room on Coruscant.

    5. Re:council by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure if you actually meant to do that that, but I must applaud you for calling it the "Emperor's thrown room" -- brilliant!

    6. Re:council by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      For that matter, the same goes for the open pits in the Emperor's thrown room.

      5 stars, intentional or not.

    7. Re:council by mrdoogee · · Score: 1

      Nitpick here.

      Actually the chambers of Congress meet in the north and south wings on the Capitol building, the rotunda serves more of a museum role, with statues, busts, art and documents lining its walls. Also dead Presidents and other statesmen lie in state there on occasion.

    8. Re:council by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      People here on Slashdot have a common repression of their emotional side, as being worse than their logical one. So they expect everything to have some logical explanation.
      Well, depending on what you call logical, I have one for you:

      The room was meant to feel impressive and huge. Well, I guess you know how it felt. That was the point. Not the whys.
      And this is very often the case. Some movies are only about it, and make absolutely no sense, when you don't watch it with the "heart".

      I, for one, love these strong impressions. They are just as important as a good story.
      Well, in fact, we designers of games (which are a superset of movies), are told not to look at the story/aesthetics/gameplay/technology alone, but to look at the *experience* as a whole.

      And you can say what you want, and nitpick how you want, but the first Star Wars movies were some pretty damn impressive experiences. And that merchandising approach, to let people get into that world from as many angles as possible, was so successful, that... well... here we are, *still* talking about Star Wars!

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    9. Re:council by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "the Emperor's thrown room."

      clever pun there.

    10. Re:council by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ones at the bottom are ideal if you're scared of heights. Not so ideal if two jedi are throwing seating around though.

    11. Re:council by TonyStag · · Score: 1

      There would probably be some reason to have separate secure chambers for each representative. Regional and racial hostilities are probably rife in the empire. Also there's the issue of different atmospheric requirements for different species. I really would not want to be seated next to something that needs to breath hydrochloric acid vapors through their skin.

    12. Re:council by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "...especially when it comes to government"

      No, it applies to all people of power. Corporate top management is just as grandiose.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    13. Re:council by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The whole point, I believe, is that the chamber is gigantic, and that representatives really needed to fly to get to the center and speak.

      The whole point I believe, is that Lucas thought it would look cool.

      There's massive evidence that suggest Lucas doesn't think beyond this, much less have theoretical knowledge of governmental debating structures.

    14. Re:council by dkf · · Score: 1

      I always wondered how seating was arranged. By importance? Size of your constituent population? What about the poor shmoe senators at the very, very top or very, very bottom? What a crappy seat.

      Sounds like exactly the sort of thing that would occupy immense amounts of senatorial time, preventing them from doing real damage by passing laws and such. All that jolly backbiting stupidity, put to a use to which it is truly suited.

      Oh wait, you're talking about Star Wars senators...

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  5. Here here. by jpellino · · Score: 2, Funny

    Right on. Bully. And as we all know, poor design portends end-user doom. These pathetic hacks will be lucky if they ever sell more than three tickets to the producer's three kids for this parade of dreck. And forget merchandising - it'll be a brief stopover at Dollar Tree and then to some banana republic orphanage along with the Superbowl-losing ball caps. Yes, what WERE they thinking?

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:Here here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What?

  6. Poor posting choice in the slashdot universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next time, would it be too hard to at least LIST these allegedly poor design choices in the summary? At least we wouldn't immediately crash the blog that has the list (and preventing us from reading it). As a bonus it would be great if each item had a sentence or two telling why it is a poor design choice.

    Posting as AC because maybe I missed something obvious and don't want to appear stupid.

  7. Death Star by pwizard2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Death Star
    An unshielded exhaust port leading directly to the central reactor? Really? And when you rebuild it, your solution to this problem is four paths into the central core so large that you can literally fly a spaceship through them? Brilliant. Note to the Emperor: Someone on your Death Star design staff is in the pay of Rebel forces. Oh, right, you can't get the memo because someone threw you down a huge exposed shaft in your Death Star throne room.

    I agree with the critique on the Death Stars. Centralized power was the fatal flaw in both, so it would have made a lot more sense to use distributed power systems throughout the Death Star II. (lots of little reactors instead of one big one) That way, the rebels would have had to destroy the DSII apart piece by piece. Given how much time that would take, the Imperials probably would have won.

    I won't even go into the Endor holocaust in detail. (guess what happens when you detonate a small artificial moon near a planetary atmosphere? You get lots of fallout, resulting in nuclear winter and lots of dead ewoks)

    --
    "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    1. Re:Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You get lots of fallout, resulting in nuclear winter and lots of dead ewoks.

      I'm not seeing a downside here.

    2. Re:Death Star by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1
      There's been some debate back and forth of the feasibility of Endor avoiding destruction (thx google). It's an interesting premise, but I'm not convinced that the wholesale destruction of Endor is necessary; I'd believe there's wiggle room.

      Anyway, Star Wars can still trounce Star Trek any day of the week. And Luke ain't no Commie stooge, like Picard is.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    3. Re:Death Star by SnoopJeDi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Distributing a lot of small reactors sounds like a logistical nightmare. Imagine the power draw when the Death Star actually intends to fire. Is it easier to lay the wire and controls necessary to manage that from one reactor, or several?

      Not to mention that by assuming the reactors are nuclear, taking down the Death Star might be even easier. More reactors, less security, I'd think it'd be easier to slip an infiltrator in to sabotage one of them.

      This article is garbage. See below:

      Let's not even go near the idea of light beams being slow enough to dodge; that's just something you have let go of, or risk insanity.

      Ah because slow light is complete science fiction, of course!

    4. Re:Death Star by pwizard2 · · Score: 1

      I'm not seeing a downside here.

      The Endor holocaust would make the Rebels just as evil as the Empire, since the rebels effectively destroyed a whole planet (just like the Empire) and committed genocide against the Ewoks. Even though the rebels did it unintentionally, it still doesn't change the fact that their actions directly lead to the deaths of some of the creatures they were trying to help.

      Plus, how do you get around the fact that Luke killed way more people by destroying the Death Star I than Vader ever did?

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    5. Re:Death Star by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      I won't even go into the Endor holocaust in detail. (guess what happens when you detonate a small artificial moon near a planetary atmosphere? You get lots of fallout, resulting in nuclear winter and lots of dead ewoks)

      Actually, that might be the easiest thing to explain, within the realm of fantasy of course.

      Radiation from the station would have travelled at close to the speed of light, but there is no guaruntee that this was at a level that would be dangerous. Obviously, the biggest problem is going to be the chunks of the station flying at the moon's surface and causing fallout issues, as well as possible massive impact events.

      However, the answer to the fallout problem is relatively simple, if you think about it. Why did anyone care about Endor at all? Because it had a big honking deflector station that was powerful enough to protect a huge battlestation in orbit from an entire fleet of capital ships. One might consider that this deflector could be retasked to provide protection from the greatest effects of the exploding station, especially if there was some time to do that. Chances are decent that there would have been some time to do this when dealing with the debris propagating at slower-than-light speeds.

      Additionally, the Rebel fleet might have been able to aid with this defense as well.

      I imagine that orbital debris protection would be something that a Galactic Republic/Empire would be pretty proficient at to begin with anyway.

    6. Re:Death Star by The+Moof · · Score: 1

      Of course, if they had just put a reinforced metal grate over the exhaust port on the first one, there wouldn't even be a need for a Death Star II. But who would be stupid enough to fly down an exhaust port...

      Also, did you see the Ewok movie? I think the world would've rejoiced at their untimely demise.

    7. Re:Death Star by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 3, Funny

      I see where you're going with this! George Lucas should have built the DSII as a cube, with decentralized structure. And Perhaps used artificial augmentations to humanoids to staff this new battle station. YES, we should get right on that! Not only that, they should replace the Emperor with .... a QUEEN!

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    8. Re:Death Star by maxume · · Score: 1

      Real slow light is propagating through something not resembling a vacuum. In anything resembling a vacuum (like air...or a vacuum), it goes real fast like.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    9. Re:Death Star by cabjf · · Score: 1

      If we're talking killing directly, how many soldiers in WWII killed more people than Hitler? I'm talking directly, since apparently ordering deaths doesn't count, otherwise Vader would probably win hands down given how high up in command he was and how brutal the Empire was supposed to be.

    10. Re:Death Star by pwizard2 · · Score: 1

      Imagine the power draw when the Death Star actually intends to fire. Is it easier to lay the wire and controls necessary to manage that from one reactor, or several?

      The superlaser would have to use some sort of huge capacitor since firing the weapon would otherwise cause a brownout by suddenly diverting most the power from the main reactor. Remember, the reactor would have a finite maximum output. Plus, there would probably be a power shortage (or power fluctuations at the very least) during the recharge cycle since the reactor can generate only so much power and it would still have to power everything else at the same time. It would not be difficult or unfeasible to have several dedicated reactors working in a cluster to power the superlaser. That way, the weapon would be able to fire (albeit slowly) and everything else would still have enough power at all times.

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    11. Re:Death Star by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      And image inf a gun battle was to break out in the detention center. It could cause a bad reactor leak and be very dangerous. Requiring time to lock it down before company came.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    12. Re:Death Star by geekoid · · Score: 1

      or just have many, small exhaust ports.

      Ignoring the fact that the death star has gravity, and the 'exhaust' wouldn't have gone anywhere with no pressure to push it...and what the hell are they 'exhausting'?

      "(guess what happens when you detonate a small artificial moon near a planetary atmosphere? You get lots of fallout, resulting in nuclear winter and lots of dead ewoks)"
      not necessarily. Most of the matter will stay in an orbit. Possible coming together again from it's own gravitational force. Of course it was a magic Hollywood explosion where everything was disintegrated.

      Of course the mass of the death star would have caused huge tidal problems on the planet. Would have ripped apart tectonic plates.
      Not the the emperor would care much.

      Never given any dimension, we don't really know how close it was.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    13. Re:Death Star by gwern · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > Plus, how do you get around the fact that Luke killed way more people by destroying the Death Star I than Vader ever did?

      Let's keep in mind that we see very little of Darth Vader; we don't hear about his genocide of the Falleen, for example (I'll assume that you will refuse to accept that Darth Vader is responsible for blowing up Alderaan, even though he was Supreme Military Executor, in charge of all military operations). The EU covers his exploits in much more detail, and gives him a more appropriate bodycount.

      Also, the people on the Death Star were military. In war, military personnel are fair game. Luke didn't go after civilians; Darth Vader and the Empire did.

    14. Re:Death Star by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Centralized power was the fatal flaw in both, so it would have made a lot more sense to use distributed power systems throughout the Death Star II

      Depends on how much of a power draw the superlaser was. Given that a single shot could destroy a planet, I'd imagine it would dwarf the power requirements of everything else on the Death Star combined. This being the case, having a distributed power generation system would have given a massive synchronisation problem.

      guess what happens when you detonate a small artificial moon near a planetary atmosphere

      Not much? Close, for a moon, is a light second or two away. Any radioactive material would be spread over such a wide volume that very little would hit Endor.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    15. Re:Death Star by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Many small reactors powering one huge power sink is essentially no different to one huge power source & many receivers, which we do all the time.

      Also, contrary to popular belief, nuclear reactors don't explode (yeah, yeah, "fusion"...though I imagine one can engineer such reactor to also be safe)

      Now, planning all service routes/vents is another thing...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    16. Re:Death Star by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      I've seen your second link before and I'm not particularly impressed by it.

      I think that first of all it's obvious that the examples chosen for Star Trek are sometimes underpowered compared to other Star Trek ships/weapons available which skews the comparison.

      There's also the bigger issue of having ships from one universe that is based on "Big numbers that Lucas dreamed up while high as a kite" (example: "Light guns" that fire 6 MT shots in a world where shields are quite rare) versus ships from another universe where it seems like the authors at least tried to make the numbers believable. In order for the comparison to be fair you'd either need to adapt the specs of Star Wars ships to the Star Trek universe or adapt the specs of the Star Trek ships to the Star Wars universe.

      You also have to factor in something that the page clearly avoids which is things like how in Star Trek targeting is done by the computer and even "manual" targeting involves a certain level of computer assistance while in Star Wars targeting is done by a bunch of guys in funny-looking helmets who are manning what looks like a WWII era AA gun that shots slow-moving globs of something.

      Basically, the comparison is biased, if you adapted a Borg cube to the Star Wars universe it would be the size of our entire solar system and be manned by a bunch of inept "droids" like C3PO who would spend most of their time stumbling around.

      /Mikael

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    17. Re:Death Star by rho · · Score: 2, Funny
      They blew up the deflector dish.

      Doubt they could rebuild it in time.

      I prefer to think that all the Ewoks died a slow, hideous death because Lucas is evil and that's the secret subtext of the movie.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    18. Re:Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with the parent. I still don't see the downside.

    19. Re:Death Star by mrdoogee · · Score: 1

      Population of Alderaan > Death Star Garrison

      Of course, technically Grand Moff Tarkin ordered the destruction of Alderaan...

    20. Re:Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're saying that doing something unintentionally is exactly the same as doing it on purpose? How do you figure?

      As for Luke, you don't need to "get around" anything. The Death Star was a military target. From what we saw, every single person on it was a member of the armed services of the Empire. Not a war crime.

    21. Re:Death Star by chelip · · Score: 1

      The idea was to destroy the Death Star, the ewoks would be collateral damage. Besides, they didnt even knew the compact version of the wookies existed.

    22. Re:Death Star by navygeek · · Score: 1

      Funny enough, they actually did get into the fallout from the Death Star II's explosion in Star Wars Galaxies. "Funny" because practically after release they started screwing things up...

    23. Re:Death Star by tmosley · · Score: 1

      The (unintentional) point is that do-gooders do more harm and damage than evil people. Someone who oppresses people for their own gain will eventually stop when they have nothing else to gain, but when someone is oppressing you for your own good, then they will never stop.

      If you need a more practical example, see the profession of dentistry.

    24. Re:Death Star by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      and lots of dead ewoks

      How is that a bad thing? ;)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    25. Re:Death Star by SOdhner · · Score: 0

      The Endor holocaust would make the Rebels just as evil as the Empire, since the rebels effectively destroyed a whole planet (just like the Empire) and committed genocide against the Ewoks.

      It's okay. First of all, I'm pretty sure that muppets - like robots or [lawyers|Microsoft executives|politicians] - don't have souls. Secondly, the debris wouldn't arrive right away and the Ewoks only need a few minutes to slap together a working deflector out of logs, vines, and mud. They're like little furry MacGuyvers.

    26. Re:Death Star by Hatta · · Score: 1

      guess what happens when you detonate a small artificial moon near a planetary atmosphere

      You get rings of debris like Saturn?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    27. Re:Death Star by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Ah, you've touched on one of my pet peeves - Thank you. Why do so many fans seem to respond differently to blowing up whole planets or 'novaing' stars than to burning off the entire surface of a world or otherwise messing up its ecology? For that matter, what's the real difference between eradicating all life on a world and killing off only the higher organisms? "I left the bacteria alive - they can re-evolve a new intelligent species in a mere billion years" is not much of a defense in court - rather it would probably come off worse than "I was only following orders.".
            Look at Trek - Genesis devices, Nova torpedoes, and 'Red Matter'. The real question is, could a federation starship zortch the surface of a planet enough to kill billions? And if it can, why are any of the weapons that also ruin or disperse the underlying rocks any worse? Mirror, Mirror says a single original NCC1701 grade cruiser can kill a planet bound ecology, or at least the entire Halkan civilization. So why do so many plot lines involve the villain who is bad because he's building a weapon that does the same thing, plus a little more collateral damage?

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    28. Re:Death Star by SBrach · · Score: 1

      Let's not even get into the fact that they show the rebels running out of the building after planting the explosives and a few seconds later an explosion big enough to kill everything in a square mile.

    29. Re:Death Star by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Nope. The Rebels were the winners, they get to write the history books.

      We ahve no idea how many people Vader killed.

      I ddin't see any non military personal on the Death star, did you?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    30. Re:Death Star by pwizard2 · · Score: 1

      I'll assume that you will refuse to accept that Darth Vader is responsible for blowing up Alderaan, even though he was Supreme Military Executor, in charge of all military operations

      Blowing up Alderaan seemed to be Tarkin's idea, and Tarkin gave the order to fire. (All Vader did was stand there) In general, Tarkin treated Vader like a subordinate in ANH (he told Vader to release that guy he was choking and Vader obeyed) and it wasn't until ESB when Tarkin was dead that Vader began acting like a commander.

      The Death star wasn't fully operational and was still under construction to some extent until ANH, so there were probably plenty of civilians onboard when Luke blew it up. There certainly had to be some people that were only serving the Empire because they had no choice. (although I admit that I'm speculating) Also, did the Rebels ever formally declare war on the Empire before the Battle of Yavin?

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    31. Re:Death Star by Arykor · · Score: 1

      That might depend on your definition of vacuum. The first citation of the linked Wikipedia article states that they slowed light to 38 miles per hour sending it through something "at super-low temperatures and super-high vacuum".

    32. Re:Death Star by maxume · · Score: 1

      Apparently, creating a Bose-Einstein condensate requires the extreme vacuum (presumably because stray atoms would heat the atoms in the condensate, ruining it). The light slows down in the Bose-Einstein condensate, not in the vacuum surrounding it.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    33. Re:Death Star by mrdoogee · · Score: 1

      Ok, who let the tribble lovers in?

    34. Re:Death Star by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I agree with the critique on the Death Stars. Centralized power was the fatal flaw in both,

      Which means the death star is itself a metaphor about the problems with the centralized power of the Empire. Lucas at least seemed to understand symbolism, myth, and how to tell a story (for the first movie anyway).

    35. Re:Death Star by swb · · Score: 1

      How many people did Hitler kill personally?

      I'm thinking the bombardiers of the Dresden firebombing missions probably have a fair claim to the title.

    36. Re:Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Star Wars: Serious Business

    37. Re:Death Star by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Intent.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    38. Re:Death Star by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      The big problem is not fallout - that's spitting in the wind compared to an EXPLODING MOON IN CLOSE ORBIT! Seriously, blow up anything that size 200 miles over a planet and anything that can see it is dead.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    39. Re:Death Star by bckrispi · · Score: 1

      ^That's no moon. While sharing the exterior surface area of a small moon, the Death Stars were relatively hollow on the inside.

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    40. Re:Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who said that didn't happen >.> they don't show the ewoks again

    41. Re:Death Star by lennier · · Score: 1

      "Not only that, they should replace the Emperor with ...."

      Instead of a Dark Lord you would have a QUEEN! Not dark, but beautiful and terrible as the dawn! All shall love me and despair!

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    42. Re:Death Star by gwern · · Score: 1

      The Death Star was the embodiment of Tarkin's Tarkin Doctrine; of course Vader would let Tarkin use it as he saw fit. But nevertheless, the buck stopped at Vader's door. The 'supreme' adjective in his title ain't there for pretty; nor was he Palpatine's right-hand man for nothing. As for the choking thing, that might just be Vader realizing he was acting childishly.

      Now, as for construction crew; while you may be channeling _Clerks_ there, we don't see any non-military personnel on the Death Star I, nor is it ever described or appear uncompleted. Whatever was left to do was no doubt being taken care of by the select picked crew of the Death Star I. The original construction was done by Wookiee slaves and Desapyre prisoners - all dead or gone by Yavin.

      Finally: since when do rebellions need to declare war? But if you really insist: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Corellian_Treaty

    43. Re:Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the Death Star II and the clerks argument?

    44. Re:Death Star by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      ...as they say, you can't make an omelett without breaking some eggs...

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
    45. Re:Death Star by rgarbacz · · Score: 1

      Plus, how do you get around the fact that Luke killed way more people by destroying the Death Star I than Vader ever did?

      So what you are saying is, that in case of an imminent holocaust of your country, you would say: "No, lets not destroy this battle ship, there are thousands of people there. They came to destroy us, but we cannot be like them, let them destroy us".

      ?

    46. Re:Death Star by winwar · · Score: 1

      "I won't even go into the Endor holocaust in detail. (guess what happens when you detonate a small artificial moon near a planetary atmosphere?"

      And the fact that a small moon orbiting a gas giant is habitable not a problem?!?

    47. Re:Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > And the fact that a small moon orbiting a gas giant is habitable not a problem?!?

      I'm not a space expert, please explain to me why it would be a problem?

    48. Re:Death Star by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      Errr...hadn't that same Death Star just destroyed an entire inhabited planet? I think the death toll balance was comfortably on its side.

  8. Let's not forget...... by motherpusbucket · · Score: 1

    There is no sound in space.

    Parsec is a unit of distance, not speed

    Races as seemingly stupid as Gungans and Jawas would not posess the advanced technology seen in the movies. (I'm talking to you Jar-Jar)

    --
    "You can't really dust for vomit" --Nigel Tufnel
    1. Re:Let's not forget...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Funny you should mention parsec being a distance not a speed. I once was a TA for a astronomy class and one of the homework questions was something the lines about why Han's use of the word parsec was wrong. Most people said the same thing that it was a distance not a speed however I got one student who gave a page long discourse on why although a parsec is a unit of distance, Han used it correctly. The reasoning went along the lines that the path he was taking was littered with black holes preventing any direct route. The faster the ship goes, the closer you can get to the black holes and therefor the shorter the path. So in this particular instance, using a distance as a measure of speed works.
      I had to give the student credit, but I have never been able to shake the feeling that it was a mistake in the movie and someone went back and created a reason for it later. Just my two cents.

    2. Re:Let's not forget...... by motherpusbucket · · Score: 1

      i stand corrected on the parsec issue.
      But the Aluminum Falcon could not have made any noise while making that Kessel Run.

      --
      "You can't really dust for vomit" --Nigel Tufnel
    3. Re:Let's not forget...... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      This is a retcon (I think it was actually from one of the spin-off novels). The problem is, a parsec is a huge distance. We're looking at interstellar distances. Way more than the distance a black hole would affect you.

    4. Re:Let's not forget...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or Han Solo's just a cocky bastard who isn't exactly book smart. Not good at the sales pitches, but he can perform in the field.

      I've always preferred that line of thinking. Adds to his character.

    5. Re:Let's not forget...... by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There is no sound in space.

      There's no incidental music in the real world. I like to consider space sound effects to be the same sort of thing.

    6. Re:Let's not forget...... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      There is no sound in space.

      Except that which is recreated by a ships proximity computer in order to help senses feel as though you were in a familiar atmosphere.

      Parsec is a unit of distance, not speed

      And it is used for measuring the shortest orbital arc possible around a super massive black hole. being what the cassel run was.

      Races as seemingly stupid as Gungans and Jawas would not posess the advanced technology seen in the movies. (I'm talking to you Jar-Jar)

      But they may be able to pick it up along the way. Most modern day thugs have no idea how to build a semi-auto pistol yet seem to have them.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    7. Re:Let's not forget...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Jar-Jar could have advanced technology without understanding it. Look at the US or Europe or Israel. Smart white/jewish people create a society, art, inventions, advanced technology, etc. However, smart/affluent people have a low birthrate so the jar-jars, who spend all day popping out welfare babies and watching tv, soon overrun the planet.

    8. Re:Let's not forget...... by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      39.1 light years. Gravity "travels" at the speed of light, though, so I'm not sure that quick reactions and trick piloting are that important.

    9. Re:Let's not forget...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In space, no one can hear you whine.

    10. Re:Let's not forget...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no incidental music in the real world.

      There is with portable mp3 players. Grocery shopping to Black Sabbath or the Conan the Barbarian soundtrack is an epic experience.

    11. Re:Let's not forget...... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The anime "Starship Operators" handles that well. The crew is somewhat offended when a news network adds sound effects to footage of their space combats.

    12. Re:Let's not forget...... by LihTox · · Score: 1

      There's no incidental music in the real world.

      There is with portable mp3 players. Grocery shopping to Black Sabbath or the Conan the Barbarian soundtrack is an epic experience.

      Along the same lines, perhaps spaceship computers are designed to add sound effects to nearby collisions and explosions, to give their passengers the audio feedback they expect.

    13. Re:Let's not forget...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no sound in space.
      There's no incidental music in the real world. I like to consider space sound effects to be the same sort of thing.

      Speak for yourself!! (dum dum duuuumm!)

    14. Re:Let's not forget...... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      The reasoning went along the lines that the path he was taking was littered with black holes preventing any direct route. The faster the ship goes, the closer you can get to the black holes and therefor the shorter the path. So in this particular instance, using a distance as a measure of speed works.

      Okay, that at least makes some sense physically... But what still doesn't make sense is describing the outcome in terms of distance. Okay, you took a shortcut. How much time did the shortcut save you? That's still the relevant piece of information. Even if the nature of the shortcut implies that to take it you had to be going very fast, still the ultimate question is "So how fast did you finish the Run?" Running on the inside track in a 10k or sticking your chest out at the end of the 100m dash doesn't do you any good if you still don't cross the line first.

      A much better explanation was given by the AC and I agree with it: Han was blowing smoke up Luke and Ben's ass, the "baffle 'em with bullshit" method of impressing potential customers that he considers to be desert-planet hicks.

      An even better explanation is that Lucas just picked a "spacey"-sounding unit but didn't know or care what it meant. But that explanation doesn't enhance Han's character. :P

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    15. Re:Let's not forget...... by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      I always liked the theory that the galaxy Star Wars takes place in is permeated with dense (but relatively transparent) gas, which explains sound effects and why starships slow down when they turn off their engines ;-)

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    16. Re:Let's not forget...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no incidental music in the real world. I like to consider space sound effects to be the same sort of thing.

      Maybe not in your world :P

    17. Re:Let's not forget...... by IKnwThePiecesFt · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine that's way more into Star Wars than myself actually told me that somewhere in the expanded universe or something they do offer up this explanation. That apparently when your radar picks up a tiefighter to your right the cockpit plays the sound that would make to provide the pilot with additional environmental information.

    18. Re:Let's not forget...... by bckrispi · · Score: 1

      Races as seemingly stupid as Gungans and Jawas would not posess the advanced technology seen in the movies.

      Well, that's kinda one of the recurring themes of the entire saga. You dismiss your adversary as "primitive" at your peril. Lucas took a lot of inspiration from the lessons of Viet Nam, where the mightiest armed force in the world was hamstrung by what amounted to little more than a peasant army. The Gungans were dismissed as "primitive", even though they had a well-equipped army. The Ewoks had no advanced weaponry, but had far superior knowledge of their terrain.

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    19. Re:Let's not forget...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parsec thing has been well covered.
      Here is one place: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Kessel_Run

    20. Re:Let's not forget...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parsec thing has been poorly rationalized.

      FTFY - KTHXBYE!

    21. Re:Let's not forget...... by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Not all Gungans are as stupid as Jar-Jar. The others seemed reasonably intelligent.

    22. Re:Let's not forget...... by Trogre · · Score: 1

      or feedback speakers in nearby spaceships picking up radiation signatures from engines and ordinance fire.

      I like to think that those headphones Han and Luke donned weren't just for chatting with each other. If I were designing a small space-fighter I'd probably kit it out with antenna tuned to common engine types and build a 3d-field stereo headset in the helmet. And not just for listening to oggs in hyperspace.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    23. Re:Let's not forget...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tend to think of them as being the sounds heard inside the ships. Kind of like in the first episode of Andromeda, when they show time slowing down drastically as they approach a black hole--a camera on the ship wouldn't have seen that, but one a few AU away shooting through the window would have.

    24. Re:Let's not forget...... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Nothing matters as much as destroying the original, quite good, film to make way for one in which a bloodthirsty bounty hunter shoots his target from across a table after taking a minute to aim and misses by quite a bit.

      Changed the whole character of a pivotal character, and made Ol' Ben's description of Mos Eisley Spaceport seem hyperbolic. In the remade film, MES is, at best, the fifth or sixth most wretched hive of scum and villainy Luke will see over the next six months.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    25. Re:Let's not forget...... by motherpusbucket · · Score: 1

      Well, the Ewoks were armed with zippers on their backs.

      --
      "You can't really dust for vomit" --Nigel Tufnel
    26. Re:Let's not forget...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Races as seemingly stupid as Gungans and Jawas would not posess the advanced technology seen in the movies.

      You think Gungans and Jawas are 'stupid' just because they talk like Steppin' Fetchit or Munchkins?? The ignorance and prejudice of people like you makes me sick!! Go back to herding nerfs on your hick farm, bantha breath!!

  9. Nothing to see here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Move along.

  10. call me a cynic... by Emesee · · Score: 1

    news for nerds? stuff that _matters_? (emphasis added) Here? on this story? news for nerds, perhaps (ok, probably - excluding yours truely) stuff that matters? hmm... really? no offense or anything.... but... hmm... the other stories were interesting to day, most of them were... i'm just saying. dunt mean to be a trawl or nuthing..... oh well. :)

    --
    contribute at wikademia
  11. Star Wars? by terrence.donnelly · · Score: 1

    Never heard of it...

    1. Re:Star Wars? by MPAB · · Score: 1

      You must be new here ...

  12. Written by who? by S3D · · Score: 1

    Scalzi himself have problems with world design as well. In his Old Man's War universe in book three it's suddenly revealed that good guys of first two books are actually bad guy. Colonies military leadership, smart, efficient, canning and somehow cynical but dedicated to protection of humanity in the first books, suddenly happens to be dumb power-grabbing war-mongering egoistic parasites in the next two books.

    1. Re:Written by who? by zakur · · Score: 1

      ...by WHOM...

  13. Too easy by Minwee · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Inconsistencies and illogical details in the Star Wars Universe?

    Fish. Barrel. Large bore shotgun.

    Star Wars, like much of the Space Opera and Science Fantasy genre, follows only one well tested design strategy: The Rule of Cool. If something looks cool, and it doesn't get in the way of the story, it's in. Once you can accept that you're good.

    1. Re:Too easy by motherpusbucket · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Rule of Cool" Exceptions: Jar-Jar
      Ewoks
      Count Dooku
      Blue Elephant playing keyboard

      --
      "You can't really dust for vomit" --Nigel Tufnel
    2. Re:Too easy by Speare · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A lot of people bitch and complain at the cheesy dialogue, the goofball proper nouns like the Mon Calimari, the broad-strokes caracatures like Jar Jar, and the massive holes in logic. They rally with things like "geez, just hire a dialogue writer and it'd be so much better." Even Carrie Fisher had a hard time coming to grips with how bad the dialogue was.

      However, these things are bad by design. Lucas wants it that way. Just as today's kids were not in the theaters for 1977 Star Wars, Carrie Fisher and crew were not in the theaters for the real inspiration: saturday matinee serial adventure movies of the 50s. Indiana Jones is cut out of the same cloth. Pump flashy moves and totally cornball bad-writing into the minds of bored kids, and rake in the ticket sales. These are third-rate comic books in celluloid form, with little more than a title and a short beer conversation for pre-production.

      To pay homage and recapture the "magic" of those 1950s serials, Lucas has completely chosen to include a patchwork of nonsensical and patronizing elements. Bad accents equals bad people? Check. Steel-hearted women melt when the hero-boy forces a kiss on them? Check. Layer on a milquetoast political plotline that some people will take to be allegory for current affairs? Check.

      Either that, or Lucas is a dipshit. Rolling in money, but somehow a moron nonetheless.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    3. Re:Too easy by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      No. It, like all entertainment experiences, follow the rule of the core experience. Everything else is there for that experiences' sake. And in that aspect, Star Wars was one of the biggest successes in human history. Hell, it's *decades* later, and we're still talking about it. And I bet, in some hundreds of years, if will be looked at like Beethoven or Shakespeare today. (But not because of story/aesthetics/etc, but because of the experience and the world to dive in it created.)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    4. Re:Too easy by SnowDog74 · · Score: 1

      Bad movies aren't so entertaining when they are engineered to be bad. They're hilarious when they're unintentionally funny. But some of them weren't funny at all. Ed Wood was damned serious about what he was doing, and his films are just grating to watch.

      Also, this argument only works for the first of Lucas' original trilogy because the second and third were neither written nor directed by him. Both Irvin Kershner and Richard Marquand had different ideas about elevating Star Wars from merely a bad imitation of terrible 1950s serial sci-fi to something else... and few fanboys will argue that Empire Strikes Back isn't the best of the entire sagaâ"for that very reason. It wasn't serious drama all the time, but it took itself seriously in the right places, and loosened up in the right places. The result is something engaging.

      Speaking as one who was there... I fell asleep the first time I saw "Star Wars" in the theater 30 years ago, and fell asleep again when I saw it in 1997. I had watched it many times on video as a kid, but to go through in one sitting for two hours nonstop without a break is just agony.

      One of the things that made Raiders of the Lost Ark, another Lucas concept, great was that it had the spirit of its predecessors but also established itself as something else, apart and above all the rest. Note that Larry Kasdan wrote both Raiders and Empire. These films exist in our culture not as propped up cardboard cutouts of a bygone era but as something entirely of their own.

      It betrays a certain ignorance of cinematic history to think that Lucas' terrible dialogue was entirely an intentional nod to only the worst that the 1940's and 1950's had to offer, while failing to realize how much of Fred C. Dobbs is in both Han Solo and Indiana Jones,

    5. Re:Too easy by hey! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think you're on the right track about the appeal, but I'd be a lot more convinced it was *intentional* if you could point to examples of top notch dialog written by Lucas.

      The parallels with the cheesy old serials of yore are more than skin deep. If you look at the original Star Wars movie, its charm comes from its break neck pacing. There was so much wonderful throwaway stuff, like the cantina musicians playing Benny Goodman, but if you'd taken a good look at them they'd have looked cheesy: their faces and mouths didn't move. Instead we get a glimpse of them, and by the time we've recognized what's going on the film moves on. The cantina musician costumes were very good *for the amount of screen time they got*. They'd have been terrible for a longer scene, but as we learned from later Lucas works longer scenes have their own drawbacks.

      So it's the same thing driving both the old serials and the original Star Wars movie: the director had to cram a lot of things into the movie cheaply enough, and that means not giving you too good a look at them.

      That said, I don't see how better dialog could have harmed the movie. "Good" doesn't mean declaiming like in Shakespeare, it means appropriate to the story and how the story is told. Like the cantina musician masks, the dialog in the movie serves well enough. Later, when Lucas had the resources to make a movie as big as he wanted, we really see his artistic limitations. Things might have been different if Star Wars had only been a moderate success; he might have grown more as an artist.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    6. Re:Too easy by verbalcontract · · Score: 1

      I agree with you in principle, but watch 10 minutes of Empire Strikes Back, and then watch Attack of the Clones.

      The dialogue in ESB (and generally, the entire first trilogy) is much snappier and wittier. The prequels, on the other hand, are stuff with exposition and characters stating their explanations and motives. There's a world of difference between the two trilogies.

    7. Re:Too easy by keithrc · · Score: 1

      "The Rule of Cool." I think you're onto something here- not only have you explained Star Wars, but also the entire oeuvre of both Michael Bay and Jerry Bruckheimer.

    8. Re:Too easy by Minwee · · Score: 1

      Suddenly I want to take a very long, hot shower.

      Now where did I put that bleach?

    9. Re:Too easy by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think you're on the right track about the appeal, but I'd be a lot more convinced it was *intentional* if you could point to examples of top notch dialog written by Lucas.

      [Han Solo is about to be lowered into the carbonite chamber]
      Leia: I love you!
      Han: I know.

      Short, punchy, dramatic, and perfect for the characters. Oh wait that was an ad-lib cus Ford thought the script's cheesy "I love you too!" was a stupid thing for Han to say!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    10. Re:Too easy by hey! · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unfortunately I believe that was ad libbed by Harrison Ford.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    11. Re:Too easy by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah? Well did you know that Harrison Ford actually ad libbed Han Solo's line there?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    12. Re:Too easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just want to tell you both, "Good Luck. We're all counting on you."

    13. Re:Too easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just want to tell you both good luck. We're all counting on you.

  14. Seat belts by T-Bone-T · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't wait for the Star Trek one after reading the seat belt gripe. Idea #1: Why aren't there seat belts on the bridge? It seems like almost every episode someone gets thrown from their chair. It happens so often in ST:VOY it should be the first modification they make to the ship.

    1. Re:Seat belts by nesfreak64 · · Score: 1

      Kirk's ship actually came with guard rails you'd see people grab onto. Not so much in some of the later series, though.

    2. Re:Seat belts by Desert+Tripper · · Score: 0, Troll

      The seat belt complaint is kind of an unfair jab, as Star Wars was released before the seat belt hysteria of the 1980s-present, where thanks to the seat-belt nazis getting their way and forcing laws mandating seat belt use in cars throughout the US, it has become politically correct and almost compulsory for TV shows, advertisements, and movies to show any character in a vehicle wearing a seat belt. Look at any other movie pre-80s (actually, most movies before the 90s) and you'll never see a seat belt being used.

      Another reason why seat belts may be absent: According to several biographical accounts of George Lucas posted online, Lucas dabbled in racing as a teenager, and one of the race cars he built had a half-ass seat belt system installed. The car went out of control one day and plowed into a tree at 60mph. The belt system failed and he was thrown free, only sustaining minor injuries. Had the seat belt worked, he would have almost certainly died, and we wouldn't have the Star Wars universe today.

    3. Re:Seat belts by CyberLord+Seven · · Score: 1
      Oh, it's a lot worse than you imagine.

      Star Trek: The Motion Picture made those very modifications. Kirk got a seat-retention system that consisted of arm rests that folded down over his thighs to hold him in his seat. Really cool upgrade.

      Then you notice that a lot of the people on the bridge are standing up! WTF?

      I still like the movie though, and I remain a bigger Trek fan than a Star Wars fan.

      --
      We have always been at war with Eurasia!
    4. Re:Seat belts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should also ask why they store pyrotechnics in the navigation console. I've had a 1kw PSU blow up on me, and all the evidence was a bang, a puff of smoke, and the breaker popping in the garage.

    5. Re:Seat belts by yabos · · Score: 2, Informative

      Duh, they have inertial dampeners. If they can stop you from getting squashed when going from a dead stop to warp 9.975 in a few seconds it should be able to handle a few bumps.

    6. Re:Seat belts by geekoid · · Score: 1

      They could also use the high tech electronic equipment known as 'the fuse'.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:Seat belts by sznupi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Airplanes had seatbelts for a long, long time. Even common folks from back then would be used to the idea, implemented in passenger planes.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    8. Re:Seat belts by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Clearly the technology is too advanced to manufacture.

    9. Re:Seat belts by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      More to the point, I don't see how a flying vehicle like in star wars would stop fast enough to have a problem like falling out.

    10. Re:Seat belts by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      unfortunately they never had an intergalactic Ralph Nader (therefore no "Unsafe at Hyperspeed"), and all the space ship manufacturers are colluding to not add safety features so that the government won't get the idea to regulate space ship safety

    11. Re:Seat belts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I recall correctly, there was an inertia-dampening device around the warp core to prevent the spaghettification of its crew when the ship goes to warp. That being the case, crew members would have had to jump from their seats of their own accord, the ship having taken a hit. I believe that effect is observed in the Historical Records.

    12. Re:Seat belts by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Problem is: When they stop working, it rips you into pieces. ;)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    13. Re:Seat belts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Each episode is months to years since the last one generally. One expulsion every few months aint so bad. Add to that that you've never seen anyone get thrown FROM THEIR SEAT through the viewscreen, and we're not even close to on-par with what we call "modern vehicles."

      I wouldn't wear a seatbelt either.

      What does strike me is that seemingly behind every electrical panel (what should be some kind of touch-screen or anything really) is a something that amounts to a massive pipe of plasma and a large rail of many megavolts of electricity that often LEAP OUT of the innocuous panel and kill or gravely wound the person using it. THIS.. is a bad design.

    14. Re:Seat belts by hey! · · Score: 1

      Oh, that one's easy. The bridge officers don't want them because if there is ever a bad accident they think their chances are better if they're thrown clear of the ship.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    15. Re:Seat belts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      no seatbelts in star trek because the crew needs to be able to quickly duck away from their exploding consoles!

      duh.

    16. Re:Seat belts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they had seat belts, it would take too much time to film the actors sitting down and buckling up and then unbuckling and getting out of the seat. Plus, it'd feel too much like a PSA. "Now remember kids, whether you're piloting a starship or just riding in the car with mom, you should always wear your seat belt!"

    17. Re:Seat belts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Had the seat belt worked, he would have almost certainly died, and we wouldn't have the Star Wars universe today.

      What a loss that would have been.

      [rolling eyes]

    18. Re:Seat belts by Selfbain · · Score: 1

      Why do they always pick the most important members of the crew to go to dangerous planets is what I want to know.

      Also, the people who wrote those shows/movies are aware space has 3 dimensions right? I loved it in Star Trek 6 when the planet exploded in a ring and Sulu's ship just happened to be on the exact same plane as that ring. His ship must also have been many light years away considering he was in Federation space and the explosion was in Klingon space so that explosion had also apparently developed warp drive.

      --
      Well, it has never been successfully tested.
    19. Re:Seat belts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh, they have inertial dampeners. If they can stop you from getting squashed when going from a dead stop to warp 9.975 in a few seconds it should be able to handle a few bumps.

      That does a fat lot of good when the power conduits have to be dynamically rerouted due to a torpedo hit on the ship's hull, and as a result, said dampeners lose power for a moment...

      On the other hand, do they have seat belts in subs? Battleships?

    20. Re:Seat belts by daveime · · Score: 1

      And like a lot of things mandated by the airline industry (banning cell phones, banning smoking sections, banning bottled water fer christs sake) etc., the use of seat belts has NOTHING to do with safety, and EVERYTHING to do with making it easier to (more) accurately identify the corpses after a crash, if they are strapped into seats with numbers on them.

    21. Re:Seat belts by Steve001 · · Score: 1

      Hurricane78 wrote:

      Problem is: When they stop working, it rips you into pieces. ;)

      True. My opinion on the way Star Trek's gravity system works (based on what we've seen) is that the system is fine as long as everything goes as planned (the system perfectly handles the gravity to ensure there isn't even a sensation of moment). However, it is when anything unexpected (like a shot from an enemy ship) happens that's when the gravity system lags in compensating for the change in momentum. However, it is still fast enough to minimize the danger to the crew (so they get a non-lethal jolt instead of going splat against the wall).

    22. Re:Seat belts by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      but you're dead anyway - why bother with straps?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    23. Re:Seat belts by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seat belts are one thing, but when between now and the setting of Star Trek did people forget how to make fuses? If there's a power spike to your console, the fuse should blow, and an engineer should have to pull out the melted components and plug a new one back in before you can use it again. It should not explode and kill you. Given the advances in OLEDs and so on, the power usage of a typical starship console should be well under 10W by the time ST is set. With a properly-rated fuse you should barely feel a shock if it's damaged.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    24. Re:Seat belts by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Any vessels that move as dynamically as ships in ST (so...probably only very high-perf motorboats) do have them.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    25. Re:Seat belts by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Evidently said dampeners don't do their job...why shun in this case proven (even if old-tech) solution?

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  15. There is a reason they call it fiction by sixminutemile · · Score: 1

    They call it fiction because it is fiction. If it never really happened is that bad design?

    --
    http://credme.com/verify/slashdot.org/sixminutemile?60819936046573
    1. Re:There is a reason they call it fiction by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Fiction has to be believable, to draw the reader/viewer into the story. It's called suspension of disbelief. You may suspend your disbelief easily; good for you. Some people need more realistic details in order to be convinced, though.

      At a minimum we can say, 'Boy, that fictional character who designed that is dumb', which then affects our understanding of the characters, when then affects how we view the story. Just realizing that Annikin designed C3PO to translate millions of languages but left him unable to handle sign language tells me that Annikin isn't as good a droid builder as he thought he was. (Or that there's no sign language in the Star Wars universe, which seems odd but is another interesting datum if true.)

      --
      Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    2. Re:There is a reason they call it fiction by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Maybe he was a better computer designer and programmer than he was physical motion.

      Maybe, being a slave, he didn't have access to the most high tech physical equipment for actuators and motors.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    3. Re:There is a reason they call it fiction by Boomerang+Fish · · Score: 1

      How easily one can suspend their disbelief is also a function of what you go into the story expecting...

      I was 10 when I saw the first movie -- lack of knowledge and a love of a good light show made the movie cool to me at the time; now, not so much, though I can still enjoy it as an epic tale of Good versus Evil.

      If I try to watch it as "hard science fiction", I'll agree it's an epic fail, but is that Lucas's failure in what he presented, or my failure in expecting something that he never intended to provide?

      If you want to insist on hard science in your science fiction, then be very selective and expect to be disappointed a lot. If you want a good story, well some of these didn't do too badly on that score.

      --
      I Drank what?

    4. Re:There is a reason they call it fiction by hattig · · Score: 1

      Or that he found an audio module and a translator module in the dump to use in the droid, but not a visual analysis module, and certainly not the interconnects to connect the visual analysis to the translator properly, and certainly he couldn't find decent limb assemblies beyond basic parts that were dumped.

      I mean, it's like Scrapheap Challenge, and nothing on that works well.

      I'd say the surprise was that C3P0 actually lasted so long instead of being retired, scrapped or enhanced-as-a-personal-project into something that wasn't shit.

    5. Re:There is a reason they call it fiction by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Why would you need sign language when you can get a brain-to-computer interface to speak for you? With the advanced medicinal and technological aspects of the Star Wars universe, it's entirely logical to assume sign language (which is only used by crippled people) would be unnecessary.

      Of course, this relates only to races which use an auditory language. You might still have entire races which use sign language as a means of communication (either primarily or secondarily). However, the wide variety of alien body types would make duplicating any fair number of "sign languages" difficult, to say the least. What if their sign language depended heavily on having eight-fingered hands?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  16. Wrong. by jayme0227 · · Score: 4, Funny

    This article is wrong on so many levels, but, of course, is easy to defeat: Everyone knows that the Star Wars universe is perfect. George Lucas had fully anticipated exactly what was going to happen in all 6 movies (and all of the books, comics, cartoons, etc.) while designing the first movie. To question this is heresy, and therefore you, John Scalzi, are a heretic.

    --
    But then I realized the cable was blue, so I only gave it one star. I hate blue.
    1. Re:Wrong. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Is John Scalzi really interesting enough to be a heretic?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Wrong. by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      I've read a few books on how to write, and the way 'Clone Wars" was used in the first movie (4 - A New Hope), is a classic throwaway line. The writer wants to explain how two people knew each other, so he has them meet during 'the war'. He could have had them know each other from college, business, or politics instead. A halfway good writer (and Lucas is actually halfway good), makes it more specific - just like in a mundane fiction book set in the current time-frame, it's easy to claim two older people knew each other from "the Nam". A better writer might look up a bit of the history, mention a specific town or battle, something like that. A not so good writer might make up the name of a town that merely sounds Vietnamese - "Duk-Trang - your dad was with the 103rd Airborne, flying Seminole assault choppers.". SF and Fantasy are easier - there's no history books needed.
            Either way, it's not intended to lead anywhere. When Lucas wrote the first screenplay, it was common to use the technique just for verisimulitude, although more modern writer's guides sometimes mention that these throwaways are good places to find raw material if the work results in demand for a sequel and writers should use lots of them so they aren't painted into a corner in developing a series.
            Since Lucas was writing a film called "Star Wars", set up as part 4 of a serial, picking a war instead of one of the other options fit, and I would just about bet that when he wrote that line, he had no plans for a sequel, and hadn't really thought about which side the clones were to fight on, what the whole clone war was about, or any of that.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
  17. This is from a non Star Wars fanatic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (Well at least not after the last 3 shit piles)

    This blog entry was pure garbage.

  18. Who needs 10? by Scragglykat · · Score: 1

    ...when midichlorians, as told to us by George Lucas, are essentially behind it all!

  19. Is that the best you can do? by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Blasters have a lot of ammunition, can penetrate trooper armour, and have inherent tracer rounds. Also we have no idea whether traditional firearms even exist in the Star Wars universe. A landspeeder is a cheap transport in a fairly underdeveloped region. R2 units have no need to speak. Most electronic devices don't. They use standardised alerts. C-3P0 is cowardly because protocol droids are expensive bits of kit and should protect themselves (R2 units are more likely to be useful in the field so are designed to be a little less safe).

    No mention of the bridge on a Star Destroyer being such an easy target for a kamikaze, or poor visibility in a Tie Fighter.

    1. Re:Is that the best you can do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sand people use ballistic rifles. Not sure if they use chemical explosives or compressed air or some other technology to actually fire them though.

  20. John Scalzi by Icegryphon · · Score: 1

    This guy is clearly training on his skills to Troll fellow nerds.
    Here I though some time on any of the Chan sites was a good way to become a more professional troll
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0

  21. The Star Wars universe by geekoid · · Score: 1

    has never been OSHA approved.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  22. Star Wars is Fantasy, Not Science Fiction by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's always been about epic myths and magic, Good versus Evil, Greek Tragedy, etc. Except on different planets, not in a mist-shrouded past of Earth. To criticize it's light saber technology is like criticizing Xena's chakram physics.

    1. Re:Star Wars is Fantasy, Not Science Fiction by Shakrai · · Score: 1, Funny

      To criticize it's light saber technology is like criticizing Xena's chakram physics.

      I wouldn't mind a chance to try out some physics experiments with Xena ;) Or Gabrielle for that matter. Least before they made her into a damn blonde.

      I'm sorry, what were you talking about again?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  23. The "real" reasons why by gad_zuki! · · Score: 5, Funny

    >R2D2's speech

    The original voice of R2D2 died of heat exhaustion while wearing the suit. In his honor they used digital beeps.

    >C3P0 and mincing gay man

    This is because C3P0 is a gay robot. Its a shame Scalzi is such a bigot that he cannot accept homosexual robots. Someday, 3P0, someday you'll be accepted and you can marry that nice medical robot who has been checking you out.

    >Lighsaber guards

    With the guard up all lightsaber fights ended in a stalemate. The jedi council of 4922 banned them for the sake of "sport and honor."

    >Blasters

    In the star wars world, lead bullets are useless against storm trooper armor. So everyone needs to use blasters which are slower and noisier. Blasters also release a mint scent which is an added bonus.

    >Luke's lack of seatbelts

    Luke was originally told his father died asphyxiating from a seatbelt after an accident that flipped his speeder. Luke vowed to never take that chance and removed his.

    >Stormtrooper armor

    In a sophisticated universe, style is very important. "The path to defeat, an unstylish military is. - Yoda"

    >Death star

    The empire has always been a good sport and has left vulnerabilities in all its designs.

    >a huge exposed shaft in your Death Star throne room.

    To be fair, this was put in so the emperor could toss people down it as he pleased. He knew it was a risk someone could toss him down it too, but he was crazy that way.

    1. Re:The "real" reasons why by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      To be fair, this was put in so the emperor could toss people down it as he pleased. He knew it was a risk someone could toss him down it too, but he was crazy that way.

      Overconfidence was his weakness.

    2. Re:The "real" reasons why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yours is the only response so far that seemed to get that the original article was a fluff piece and not real criticism.

    3. Re:The "real" reasons why by azgard · · Score: 0, Troll

      Also, about that "how could they have evolved" argument: Most Americans don't believe in evolution, so this critique is moot.

    4. Re:The "real" reasons why by Selfbain · · Score: 1

      The empire has always been a good sport and has left vulnerabilities in all its designs.

      Not just the Empire but the Trade Federation too. Everyone knows the way to run a droid army is through one centralized server with no backup system.

      --
      Well, it has never been successfully tested.
    5. Re:The "real" reasons why by daveime · · Score: 1

      Your faith in your friends is yours !

    6. Re:The "real" reasons why by dkf · · Score: 1

      Not just the Empire but the Trade Federation too. Everyone knows the way to run a droid army is through one centralized server with no backup system.

      Never underestimate the capacity of businessmen to cut corners. The backup server was probably an optional extra that they declined; hardly the fault of the vendor if the customer explicitly turns down a robustness feature. After all, any number of small IT businesses today dispense with fripperies like backups, so why would a Trade Federation be any different?

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    7. Re:The "real" reasons why by Martin+Spamer · · Score: 1

      Storm trooper armour

      Why should a corrupt military industrial complex in a fictional universe not make the same mistakes as a corrupt military industrial complex in the real world. c.f. SA-80 Assault Rifle, Aluminium super-structure & Nylon Uniforms on warships, Bradley Fighting Vehicle, Patriot Missiles.

  24. Design IN the universe, not OF the universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought he was going to talking about what a mess the universe of Star Wars is, not what a mess the designs in the universe are. An article about the mess that is the Star Wars universe would be interesting. For example, how are there always news designs in a galaxy where technology has been effectively stagnant for millienia? Why are militaries constantly deploying new ships that don't perform any differently than old ones? If droid designs had gone from R2s to R5s in just a few decades, what about the droids in use 1000 years before? That's just from the movies. The mess that the extended universe has become could be a book to itself. It's lost any direction ever since The New Jedi Order brought in one of the most contrived enemies ever and ruined the Force.

  25. Of John Scalzi by OzPeter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Love his books to death - especially "the Andriods Dream", but like all authors his own books have more holes than swiss cheese.

    Like computers built into peoples heads that seem to have unlimited bandwidth data links over huge distances - yet there is no power requirements and the enemy can't detect the transmissions

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:Of John Scalzi by Keiran+Halcyon · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not really sure to what you're referring on the second half of your post. Mention is made repeatedly of the fact that data bursts take time to execute, and that most of the information being relayed back and forth is small; tactical positions, status updates, small personal messages, etc. All of these could be done with a single Ad-Hoc wifi connection in our day and age, with our tech.

      The power requirements for the brain pal were handled internally by the device itself. In other words, it had a battery. Perhaps one that could be charged off the body's own internal energy sources? Remember, these bodies were basically designed to be the ultimate combat chassis, and so the fact that the body's own internal electrical field could be used to do something like that...not a big deal.

      Finally, in The Last Colony, a huge deal is made of the fact that the enemy *can* intercept electronic transmissions, to the point that not a single colonist on the planet is allowed to have a BrainPal active, even the military personnel, unless they're in a specially shielded bunker. In fact, nobody is allowed to have any form of electronic technology that could so much as broadcast a byte of data, because it could be picked up *across the solar system* by an enemy ship.

    2. Re:Of John Scalzi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to pick a nit, but in several books they have to shut down their "brainpals" so the enemy can't detect them, and in one, they're actually hacked.

    3. Re:Of John Scalzi by basicio · · Score: 1

      Of course they do. Most books do. Although to be fair, I don't think BrainPal power requirements are really an issue. I mean, if you can build a computer that interfaces with someone's brain I assume you can deal with tying it into the body's metabolism.

    4. Re:Of John Scalzi by TheGreatGraySkwid · · Score: 2, Informative

      In addition to the points of the commenters before me, I'll point out that communication between CDF soldiers while in combat armor is specifically described as being performed via tight-beam laser links so as not to give away their position with BrainPal EM chatter.

      Really, Scalzi thought about this kind of thing. He's pretty thorough.

      --
      The Humblest Mollusk on the Net
  26. Digg Fodder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How did this obvious Digg fodder make it onto the front page of Slashdot?

  27. The Dialog by Subm · · Score: 1
    The worst design in the Star Wars universe was the dialog, or whatever design allowed Lucas to write it.

    Or maybe Mark Hamill's acting.

  28. Design safety by TheLink · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah and a long long time ago in a galaxy far away they obviously didn't have such stuff like OSHA.

    Or they'd have railings to stop people from falling into pits and other nasties...

    Clearly it's a galaxy where they didn't have warning stickers on lightsabers to tell people "This way to enemy", or "Do not point lightsaber at remaining head".

    But still...

    --
    1. Re:Design safety by readin · · Score: 1

      Yeah and a long long time ago in a galaxy far away they obviously didn't have such stuff like OSHA.

      Or they'd have railings to stop people from falling into pits and other nasties...

      Clearly it's a galaxy where they didn't have warning stickers on lightsabers to tell people "This way to enemy", or "Do not point lightsaber at remaining head".

      But still...


      That's why they were able to develop so much cool technology so long ago. They were thinking with their heads instead of with their lawyers.

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
  29. Well by Octogonal+Raven · · Score: 0

    I'm certainly never going to read any of his books now. If he rails on the interesting parts of another sci-fi universe, I believe it's a safe bet that his is utterly dull. As to the comment on there about "Human-cyborg relations", remember that a cyborg is a cybernetic organism. That would include droids, as well as "traditional" cyborgs like Lobot, Vader, and that ilk.

    --
    In God we trust, all others we virus scan.
  30. Design was generally good, but... by swanzilla · · Score: 1

    ...what is the deal with all of those Tribbles?

  31. Guide to the most epic FAILs in this article by stepinto · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is not only poorly-written, but the concept is awful. Going after lightsabers because they lack handguards? These are Jedi weapons, guy. The Jedi are surgeons with these weapons, blocking blaster fire on mere intuition. Come on. My ire for this article stems mainly from the fact that the author ignored some of the real problems with the Star Wars universe, touching only on the superficial. What about the time/distance inconsistency? (The Millennium Falcon, as you may recall, travels "0.5 past light", and yet travels from star to star in hours? Just how small and dense IS this far-away galaxy?)

    1. Re:Guide to the most epic FAILs in this article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You assume that 'point five past light speed' means 1.5c. Obviously, given the distance said ship can travel in short periods of time, that is incorrect.

      What does it actually mean? There's not enough data in the movies to say for sure, but everything I've seen indicates that the .5 is a relative time indicator compared to a 'standard' hyperdrive. For example, let's pretend 2 miles per minute (120 mph) is the standard. That means a VW Bug hits about 1.8, while an Indy car hits about .5 or so.

    2. Re:Guide to the most epic FAILs in this article by maz2331 · · Score: 1

      Maybe the empire is close to a galactic core and not in the arms where star density is low?

    3. Re:Guide to the most epic FAILs in this article by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

      Ah, but "point five past light speed" is never explicitly explained, so counting it as 150% of lightspeed is just an assumption. For all we know they use a different scale to measure things past light speed, and "point five" could be the equivalent of "Warp factor 5" or some such.

      And if you want the Expanded Universe retconned answer, read this: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Hyperdrive#Classes. (0.5 is the Falcon's "hyperdrive class", which acts as a multiplier on the travel time. Class 0.0 would be infinite speed, like Warp 10)

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    4. Re:Guide to the most epic FAILs in this article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0.5 *what* past light speed? It's kind of hard to find an inconsistency if you don't even know the units being referred to.

  32. Only 10? by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Is possible to enumerate more than 100 "flaws" on Star Wars Universe, but I need to agree with mosty of hollywood "Space Operas" do not attempt to even be plausible, what matters is just being "cool" for a number of spectators unaware of any real science or logic.


    (Brazilian portuguese)

    Eh possivel enumerar mais do que 100 "falhas", no universo de Guerra nas Estrelas, mas eu tenho que concordar que a maior parte das "Operas espaciais" de Hollywood nao tentam sequer serem plausiveis, o que importa eh apenas serem "cool" para um numero de espectadores que desconhecem qualquer ciencia real ou logica.

    --
    Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    1. Re:Only 10? by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      Oops... Seens I hurt the feelings of one fanboy with modpoints

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
  33. Actually, an apologist could probably do better by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    I believe his primary function is a flight droid so they were built to interface with ships. Not a lot else. John Scalzi seems to suffer from the "must have everything" school of thought and doesn't think the future will focus on minimalism and getting one thing right. Thank god he's not writing software and just another hot air blogger. I reject Episodes I, II & III so I don't know what he's talking about with the oil slick and jets.

    Except he seemed to interface with people too all the time, and that annoying beep has no other function than interfacing with humans. (Interfacing with ships is done much better by faster protocols.) So essentially he already _has_ that module, but it's a half-arsed dysfunctional thing. So, yes, it has no excuse. If he lacked any voice output entirely, then I'd see your point. But that's not the case.

    Again, you're overlooking his primary function. C-3PO is a protocol droid designed to serve humans, and boasts that he is fluent "in over six million forms of communication." So he's got arthritis, well, you didn't build him to be flexible or fight. You built him to look pretty and translate. Everything else is bells and whistles. I think he was meant to stand in a corner for some rich merchant or politician and translate any language imaginable. Are you going to tell me that my car is flawed because I couldn't afford a $20 toaster to put in the dash?

    Except have you looked at what an executive limo has, since you brought up a car metaphor? C3PO is the equivalent of making one, but then skipping on suspension and sound-dampening. It's that freaking retarded.

    The whole point is that he's a robot for the rich and powerful. (Your average nerf herder probably couldn't afford one, nor need to translate from and to six million languages.) Yet he looks like an unfinished contraption thrown together in someone's tool shed.

    Does it look to you like something you'd see a non-techie CEO walking around with, at a meeting with other billionaires? Really?

    Plus, IRL talks and negotiations happen in all sorts of settings, not just in meeting rooms. Probably more deals are really done on the golf course, or at some social event, or at some trade show, than in meeting rooms. Does a noisy and clumsy metal contraption really sound to you like just the kind of thing you'd want whirring and clunking around while you're trying to network with the rich and powerful at, say, a ball of some planetary royal family? You're sooo going to seamlessly mingle with that think following you around.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Actually, an apologist could probably do better by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I'm no Star Wars apologist (in fact, I'm much more of a Trekkie anyway...), but this is just silly:

      The whole point is that he's a robot for the rich and powerful. (Your average nerf herder probably couldn't afford one, nor need to translate from and to six million languages.) Yet he looks like an unfinished contraption thrown together in someone's tool shed.

      1. C3PO is "an unfinished contraption thrown together in someone's tool shed" -- he was built by an 9-year-old slave kid from parts scavenged from a junk yard, for crying out loud!
      2. Given the multitude of different aliens and languages seen just on Tatooine, let alone the rest of the galaxy, it seems reasonable that average people would need a translator a Hell of a lot more often than they do in America.
      3. He couldn't have been that fancy or expensive, since Luke's moisture-farming uncle could afford to buy him! He wasn't even all that major of a purchase, considering Owen and Luke's cavalier attitude in that scene. Apparently, droids are a commodity.
      4. C3PO is only one thing out of a huge list of worn-out and half-broken pieces of technology we see in Star Wars: the Rebels' equipment, the Millennium Falcon, everything on Tatooine, etc. Are his exposed circuits and sticky joints really that much out of place?
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Actually, an apologist could probably do better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C3PO is "an unfinished contraption thrown together in someone's tool shed"

      NO HE ISN'T!!!

      he was built by an 9-year-old slave kid from parts scavenged from a junk yard, for crying out loud!

      NO HE WASN'T!!! It was all a bad dream....

      ...cant year you! la lalala lalallalalala....!

    3. Re:Actually, an apologist could probably do better by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Yet he looks like an unfinished contraption thrown together in someone's tool shed.

      ... he is an unfinished contraption thrown together in someone's tool shed (or rather, Anakin's room).

      What? You want to know why he wasn't finished later?

      I, uh, have to work now.

  34. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  35. Darth vader promotion leads to giant step back by jeffmeden · · Score: 4, Funny

    Was I the only one bothered by the sad attempt to bridge the gap between EP 3 and EP 4 by simply throwing away all the nice full color displays and elegant controls that we saw in the ships of the first 3 episodes, and in one fell swoop go back to the flashing lights and big on/off switches of the last 3? You know, at the end of EP 3 when Darth takes command of the Empire fleet, only to strut out onto the bridge of a ship that looked like it was designed to control a hydroelectric dam and not fly among the stars...

    Maybe I was the only one.

    1. Re:Darth vader promotion leads to giant step back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Civilian v. War.

      A lincoln IS prettier than a sherman... both controls and displays.

    2. Re:Darth vader promotion leads to giant step back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah its cool. A military hummer costs like 2mil or something and yet the in-dash stuff isn't as nice as the *only* 200k audi or whatever.

    3. Re:Darth vader promotion leads to giant step back by ThrowAwaySociety · · Score: 1

      Was I the only one bothered by the sad attempt to bridge the gap between EP 3 and EP 4 by simply throwing away all the nice full color displays and elegant controls that we saw in the ships of the first 3 episodes, and in one fell swoop go back to the flashing lights and big on/off switches of the last 3? You know, at the end of EP 3 when Darth takes command of the Empire fleet, only to strut out onto the bridge of a ship that looked like it was designed to control a hydroelectric dam and not fly among the stars...

      Maybe I was the only one.

      Pretty easy to justify, if you're of the mindset. It goes along with the general theme of "Why are the 'newer' ships so much less sleek and shiny?"

      The ships of the Old Republic era were built in a time of peace. Even them "military" vehicles were mostly for show and prestige. Presumably, they were mostly flown as honor guards and diplomatic escorts. Interfaces were lavish and sophisticated, with lots of hands-off automation to make them easy to fly. But when designing for the Empire, shipbuilders switched to high-contrast interfaces centered around essential functions for their dedicated killing machines.

      For that matter, compare Compiz to the glass cockpit of a commercial jet or modern fighter.

    4. Re:Darth vader promotion leads to giant step back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard the way they justify that is by saying there was a kind of Dark Ages of technology that followed the fall of the Republic. I suppose you can see that in Darth Vader's lovely latex garments and silly hat at the end of ep3.

  36. that's fucking great! Mod parent up by Shakrai · · Score: 1

    TD-0013 does it best:

    http://www.adpov.net/2005/03/09/adpov-001/

    That's fucking awesome, just so you know. Reminds me of the old Cops/Stormtroopers parody.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  37. Superficial Viewpoint by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    My 1.9999 cents:

    R2D2 and Robots: Who needs stair-walking legs when you have jets? As far as voice synth, it may be that there are laws against talking droids on many planets such that the manufacturer left out that feature to increase sales. Remember, in the SW universe, droids are seen as 2nd-class beings, and many cultures may not want them to talk. In other words, it's a sales feature. Similar issues apply to C3P0. You are thinking like a techie instead of a marketer.

    Lightsabers: They are generally treated as a religious relic and not a practical tool. Otherwise, everyone would have one. Maybe blasters can also burn through doors. Plus, hand-guards would make them difficult to fit in one's pocket. And maybe they have an unseen hand-guard force-field, a feature that's too power-hungry to extend the full length of the sword. Just because viewers don't see it does not mean it doesn't exist.

    Blasters and Armor: You don't know the technology involved. You cannot assume blasters are simply photons. They may have features that allow them to penetrate body armor of the time. Photons or metal bullets may not work against such armor. You seem to be assuming they are using Earth-style armor, which is not likely the case. As far as storm-troopers succumbing to a single blast, that appears to be mostly from a close range. And they may still live even if incapacitated for a given battle. Partial protection is better than none. And the color may be part of this (limited) protection.

    Seat-belts: Earth cars didn't require seat-belts until around the 1970's, and many would skip them if not for laws. And you cannot jump out quickly to do battle if you have a seatbelt.

    Death Star: You don't know the full reason for the vents. Maybe the stuff being vented is highly radio-active such that complex covers don't let the radiation out fast enough.

    Sarlaac: It may also eat large fierce under-ground worms.

    Asteroid Worm: Compare to sharks: they sometimes bite boats and rafts, but this does NOT mean that boats and rafts are their typical target/food.

    Midi-Chlorian injections: They are an indicator or prerequisite of certain abilities, not necessarily the primary facilitator of such abilities.

  38. A fine line between insanity and stupdity by rudy_wayne · · Score: 1

    File this story under "Somebody has way too much free time on his hands".

    Nearly 20 years ago I tried to particpate in various Star-Trek related Usenet newsgroups. But I just couldn't do it. Trying to seriously discuss fictional characters and events is just plain stupid.

    Why did Capt. Picard say [whatever]? Because it was in the script.
    Why didn't they stop the ship from crashing? Because it was in the script.

    When you start analyzing the flaws and mistakes in fictional material you really need to follow William Shatner's advice from the sketch on Staurday Night Live -- "Get a life."

  39. Mag Boots And Missile Launchers... by Xin+Jing · · Score: 1

    I have always thought there was a serious strategic flaw in the assault of the Death Star that put fighters in the trenches approaching the exhaust port. Other than the visual pop of watching combat spacecraft navigating a narrow eqitorial corridor, it occured to me that drop-troops in powered space suits with rocket packs, magnetic boots and missile launchers amid a rain of similarly-sized chaff would pose a serious threat. You could still witness the fatal blow money shot with Luke standing over the venting exhaust port staring down into the abyss as he launches his warhead.

    1. Re:Mag Boots And Missile Launchers... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      That always bugged me too. Why did they fly along that trench for about 20 miles when they could have just flown in somewhere near the target and avoided flying past all those laser towers?

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:Mag Boots And Missile Launchers... by Xin+Jing · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure which general assumed command of the SW:Ep III attack on the Death Star or what other plans were rejected in favor of that method. I employed a similar strategy when I played Battle Of Endor on the Gamecube's Star Wars Rogue Squadron II: Rogue Leader. My wing flew at a distance perpendicular to the oncoming assault, then we circled around to attack from the side, near the rear of 3 star destroyer towers. Since the objective was to destroy key points on each Star Destroyer to complete the mission (pop the ball underneath, the two balls on the tower and the tower bridge window), I avoided the frontal onslaught and the relentless barrage that it would bring. I would have recommended a similar strategy of entering the battle nearest the exhaust port on the original Death Star. A game of this nature is about the only way to pit your own stratagies against what actually appeared in the films.

  40. C-3PO Gay? by Ohio+Calvinist · · Score: 1

    I was kind of surprised when TFA said that he felt that 3PO was supposed to be a gay-stereotype. I always considered him more of a sterotypical british gentleman or butler.

    As far as R2D2 not "speaking" with human-understandable voices, there are 2 concepts in play. Being a film, for the most part, there is no reason for R2 to speak audibly because as he works with other droids it could be assumed they can communicate through some wireless/radio method, making "speech" unnecessary and inefficent, other than the fact that it is much harder to show radio on the screen than gibberish noises. Having him unable to speak directly to the audience but having 3PO dialouge with him (for instance, in 3PO asks him to watch his language), it carefully peels away the simply utilitarian view of R2 and shows his anthropic qualities slowly and we eventually see that R2 is smart, and brave in ways that 3PO is not. It slowly exposes this quality in a way that develops the character, rather than having R2 come off as some smart ass child-bot.

    Thirdly, some people consider not being able to talk as being "cute" like babies. It makes R2 likable when he doesn't really for much of the Ep4-6 series have much that overtly makes (or is designed to make) the audience particularly like or dislike him. For example in the Kirby cartoon the creator specifically required they not give him a voice as to not take away from the "cuteness" that is considered part of the character's success.

    Though it is entirely possible that Lucas couldn't find a voice that didn't ascribe too much implied personality to a more utilitarian character. When non-human characters have human voices, you import a lot of understanding based on what you "think" the voice is (e.g. Jar-Jar), rahter than taking it as simply "just a voice."

    --
    Forgive my spelling from time to time. I'm often posting during short breaks.
    1. Re:C-3PO Gay? by dwye · · Score: 1

      I always assumed that R2-D2 couldn't (or at least, didn't) "talk human" because all the humans were also fluent in Droid. Do you ever hear a Star Wars Universe ask what the droid is talking about? No, because the understand him reasonably well, anyway. C3-PO only "translates" when R2-D2 seems to be talking nonsense, like belonging to some old General Obiwan Ken-obi guy that no one had heard about.

      Really, did you think that the Star Wars Universe was filled with monolingual Americans?
              (Writing as one :-)

    2. Re:C-3PO Gay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I always considered him more of a sterotypical british gentleman"

      Yeah, right. Gay.

    3. Re:C-3PO Gay? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Lucas said flat out, way back in 1977, that C-3PO was intented to be a fussy butler type.

      Scalzi's complaints are the same thing we've heard every time a new generation of anal-retentive geeks discovers the original movie. Nothing new there....

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  41. "fail" is a verb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "fail" is a verb.
    "failure" is a noun.

    The exceptions are idiomatic or antiquated.

    1. Re:"fail" is a verb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm waiting for the SunnyD commercial "Aw, dude, grape stuff? Epic fail !!!"

    2. Re:"fail" is a verb by Tetsujin · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm waiting for the SunnyD commercial "Aw, dude, grape stuff? Epic fail !!!"

      I can see it now...

      Kid 1: "Aw, dude, grape stuff? Epic fail!"
      Kid 3: "Noooooooo!"
      Kid 2: "Do not want!"
      Kid 3: "El oh el oh el!"
      Mom: "Who wants some Sunny D?"
      Kid 2: "Sunny D greater-than grape stuff!"
      Announcer: "New Sunny D is made of win, with vitamins and minerals that are teh roxx-zero-ars!"
      Kid 1: "Sunny D p'owns!"
      Kid 3: "Are oh tee eff el oh el!"

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    3. Re:"fail" is a verb by IMightB · · Score: 1

      SunnyD - It's got Electrolytes!

  42. Nerd-boy strikes back by SoupIsGood+Food · · Score: 5, Interesting

    R2-D2

    R2 is an astromech droid - he was designed to assist in the operation of small spacecraft. He is well suited for trundling around flight decks - he was not meant to go up and down stairs, and it's a credit to his character that he performed his duty in desert and swamp. He doesn't speak english because he speaks astromech - sentients who fly or work with spacecraft will understand astromech. Speech synthesis is unnecessary to his function... are you unhappy that your perl compiler doesn't speak in plain english?

    C-3PO

    C-3PO is a protocol droid. His form is purely ornamental, as his function is to facilitate communication between sentients, usually in a business setting. He is not required to lift heavy objects or cover rugged terrain at great speed, and the exposed wiring is probably just ornamentation. Droids develop their own personalities as they are learning and self-modifying systems - he made himself a screaming coward.

    Lightsabers

    Japanese blades often did not have a tsuba (hand guard) - relying on a tsuba to protect the hand was folly, as was slashing down a blade to get at the fingers. A quick disengage and riposte would leave you dead.

    Blasters

    I don't think the beams themselves are being dodged, but those dodging are anticipating their aim-point. Happens in most movies with regular guns, too. Blasters are recoiless and require no reloading, which makes them tactically superior to firearms.

    Landspeeders and other flying vehicles

    Unless the repulsor field was designed to keep you in place - or artificial gravity.

    Stormtrooper Uniforms

    Yeah, OK, storm trooper armor is useless.

    Death Star

    The original design flaw was overlooked by the Deathstar's builders - the Rebels analyzed the data and discovered it themselves. The second deathstar wasn't complete, and relied on planet-based shield generators rather than structure to protect it.

    Sarlaac

    Doodle-bugs (antlions) and sea anenomes rely on this same technique, and as the skeleton from ANH illustrates, Tatooine has megafauna prey.

    That Asteroid Worm Thing in Empire Strikes Back

    Not spaceships, cometary debris containing organic compounds, or spacefaring organisms that feed on same.

    Midi-Chlorians

    Lucas is as one dead to me for that midichlorian crap.

    1. Re:Nerd-boy strikes back by zakur · · Score: 5, Informative
      Japanese blades often did not have a tsuba (hand guard)

      Nonsense. A tsuba is an integral part of a practical katana. Only decorative or ceremonial long blades occasionally (e.g. shirisaya) lacked them. The tsuba didn't just protect the wielder from an opponent's blade, it also prevented the wielder's hand from sliding onto the blade during thrusts. Fighting with a tsuba-less sword would be folly.

    2. Re:Nerd-boy strikes back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Blasters are recoiless and require no reloading, which makes them tactically superior to firearms.

      Perhaps you weren't looking close enough in A New Hope.
      The blasters ejected shells.
      Look at the scene where luke and leia swing across the drawbridge thingy

      (Yes I do know why they ejected shells... http://www.originalprop.com/blog/?page_id=8524)

    3. Re:Nerd-boy strikes back by Phillip+Birmingham · · Score: 1

      Fighting with a tsuba-less sword would be folly.

      Besides, Beatrix Kiddo: tsuba. O-Ren Ishii: no tsuba. Who got the top inch of her skull lopped off?

      On topic, I LOVE Star Wars. I even loved the prequel trilogy, except for Jar-Jar.

      I also loved Scalzi's article, and the article in Cracked about the blunders (like, why didn't the Death Star just blow up Yavin and let the blast wave take care of the rebel base on its moon?) Folks need to be lightening up.

      --
      Make me aerodynamic in the evening air
    4. Re:Nerd-boy strikes back by prockcore · · Score: 4, Funny

      are you unhappy that your perl compiler doesn't speak in plain english?

      But it does speak in plain english.


      syntax error at test.pl line 1, at EOF
      Execution of test.pl aborted due to compilation errors.

      I would be upset if instead it said "beep boop beep beep".

    5. Re:Nerd-boy strikes back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Midi-Chlorians
      >
      > Lucas is as one dead to me for that midichlorian crap.

      These midichlorians do have origin in reality:

            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrion

    6. Re:Nerd-boy strikes back by Steve001 · · Score: 1

      zakur wrote (and included with a post):

      Japanese blades often did not have a tsuba (hand guard)

      Nonsense. A tsuba is an integral part of a practical katana. Only decorative or ceremonial long blades occasionally (e.g. shirisaya) lacked them. The tsuba didn't just protect the wielder from an opponent's blade, it also prevented the wielder's hand from sliding onto the blade during thrusts. Fighting with a tsuba-less sword would be folly.

      That clears up a point of confusion for me. In the series "Bleach" the other Soul Reapers find Ichigo Kurusaki's sword surprising because of its size (it's almost as long as he is tall) and that it doesn't have a handguard (as far as I know his is the only sword without one).

      BTW, in "Bleach" the sword is called a zanpakto. Its size reflects the power of the soul reaper who wields it. Ichigo's zanpakto (in its normal state) is the largest one that I've seen.

    7. Re:Nerd-boy strikes back by bckrispi · · Score: 1

      Lucas is as one dead to me for that midichlorian crap.

      Never understood the beef with this. Midichlorians really did nothing to change the nature of the force.

      OBI-WAN: The Force is what gives a Jedi his power. it is an energy field created by all living things

      YODA: My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is! Life creates it, makes it grow.

      The prequels simply expanded on the biotic nature of the Force.

      QUI-GON: Midi-chlorians are a microcopic lifeform that reside within all living cells and communicates with the Force... Without the midi-chlorians, life could not exist, and we would have no knowledge of the Force. They continually speak to you, telling you the will of the Force.

      So honestly... What's the big deal?

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    8. Re:Nerd-boy strikes back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, Santa Claus is, if not a human being (he's a "jolly old elf"), pretty much an analogue of one. It's still small comfort when you find out he's actually just your mom and dad.

    9. Re:Nerd-boy strikes back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good insight.

      But if you happen to fight with swords whose blade is a badass laser thingy that cuts into any material like it was thin air, a hand guard would be totally useless for protecting your hand against the opponent blade, and almost useless for sliding prevention - as your blade would never get stuck into anything.

    10. Re:Nerd-boy strikes back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, Santa Claus is, if not a human being (he's a "jolly old elf"), pretty much an analogue of one. It's still small comfort when you find out he's actually just your mom and dad.

      Hey! How 'bout a spoiler alert, geez!

    11. Re:Nerd-boy strikes back by rgarbacz · · Score: 1

      R2-D2

      R2 is an astromech droid - he was designed to assist in the operation of small spacecraft. He is well suited for trundling around flight decks - he was not meant to go up and down stairs, and it's a credit to his character that he performed his duty in desert and swamp. He doesn't speak english because he speaks astromech - sentients who fly or work with spacecraft will understand astromech. Speech synthesis is unnecessary to his function... are you unhappy that your perl compiler doesn't speak in plain english?

      I would add that for sure its memory was limited, and as being astro-robot for sure it is better to store astro data (for which there is never enough memory) than "Yes sir" in 6 millions forms of communication.

      Stormtrooper Uniforms

      Yeah, OK, storm trooper armor is useless.

      Not necessarily. The stormtroopers where not only to fight with another army, but also to keep order, kind of police, and the armor for sure was helpful when taking control over riots. Also helpful when establishing posts in not very friendly places (with a lot of predators).

      On the other hand having helmet and armor had a psychological effect for both their enemies (not necessarily soldiers), and themselves (have you ever heard of the Zimbardo's Stanford prison experiment?) - they were genetically modified clones, but still humans.

      Sarlaac

      Doodle-bugs (antlions) and sea anenomes rely on this same technique, and as the skeleton from ANH illustrates, Tatooine has megafauna prey.

      There was nothing in the movie about living for thousand years, just about being digested for thousand years.

    12. Re:Nerd-boy strikes back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gp got it upside-down:

      r2d2 talked beeps to people, people talked english to r2d2.
      you talk perl to the compiler, compiler talks english to you.

      see my point?

    13. Re:Nerd-boy strikes back by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      Speech synthesis is unnecessary to his function... are you unhappy that your perl compiler doesn't speak in plain english?

      Perhaps he uses Ada.

  43. Grammar droid needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Need examples? Here's ten...

    Here ARE ten, if you please.

  44. Spoonfed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I appreciate new scifi universes, Starwars obviously has issues, star trek at least has realism to some degree.

    CCPs EVE universe backstories are interesting if you spend any time reading their fiction. I hope were all beyond delving in a closed source universes that eventually crash and burn from their creators senility or whored for royalties. *COUGH~MATRIX*

  45. Artistic License (or Homer's Poor Choices) by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1. Your city is under siege and suddenly this man-made wooden horse appears out of nowhere. Any sane military command would probably blow it up or set fire to it, as opposed to taking it behind his lines and leaving it unguarded.

    2. It's a bit much for foreign leader like Menelaus to go to the trouble of war over his wife leaving him for another man. Especially in an era where women were considered simple commodities.

    3. Odysseus tries to escape from an island with a hot chick who does magic and wants to use him as a love slave back to an existence of responsibility and the possibility of mortal danger. Nuff said.

    4. The cyclops has one eye. A monster with limited depth perception is not too intimidating and wouldn't be a very effective monster.

    1. Re:Artistic License (or Homer's Poor Choices) by RazorSharp · · Score: 1

      I agree, this Star Wars blog post is the worst story I've ever read on Slashdot. Not only is it uninformative, it's also ridiculous. Star Wars is the greatest work of science fiction ever and this douche bag wants to complain about R2D2 and C3PO, the MAIN CHARACTERS! (four characters are in all films - those two, Vader, Obi-Wan). I love how he mentions he's going after Star Trek next. I shouldn't have RTFA, I feel bad for contributing to sensationalist bullshit blog posts.

      Not to mention that Lucas snubbed any complaints such as these with the line "A long time ago, in a galaxy far away. . ."

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
    2. Re:Artistic License (or Homer's Poor Choices) by qwerty+shrdlu · · Score: 1

      Menalaus was king of Sparta _because_ he married Helen.

    3. Re:Artistic License (or Homer's Poor Choices) by dwye · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's a bit much for foreign leader like Menelaus to go to the trouble of war over his wife leaving him for another man. Especially in an era where women were considered simple commodities.

      Bull. Menelaus needed to go after his "kidnapped" wife because he had the same claim to Sparta as Phillip II of Spain had to being King of England, that he had married the Queen Regnant and was supposed to shut up and get her pregnant; if she wasn't kidnapped, Paris of Troy gets to be King Matrimonial, and Menelaus is once again Agamemnon's little brother with few prospects. Agamemnon supports his brother's Quest because it is a Casus Belli to justify pillaging Troy. If it had been ended by the duel between Menelaus and Paris, the whole war would have been a failure, from the Argive perspective.

      Women were no more simple commodities when they were major heiresses than was Eleanor Of The Aquitaine a simple commodity in the Middle Ages.

    4. Re:Artistic License (or Homer's Poor Choices) by fumblebruschi · · Score: 1

      True -- not to mention that Paris didn't just run off with the Queen; the two of them took the nation's treasury with them. In the Iliad, the Greeks' demands are that Troy should punish Paris, return Helen, AND return the treasure.

    5. Re:Artistic License (or Homer's Poor Choices) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bull. Menelaus needed to go after his "kidnapped" wife because he had the same claim to Sparta as Phillip II of Spain had to being King of England, that he had married the Queen Regnant and was supposed to shut up and get her pregnant; if she wasn't kidnapped, Paris of Troy gets to be King Matrimonial, and Menelaus is once again Agamemnon's little brother with few prospects. Agamemnon supports his brother's Quest because it is a Casus Belli to justify pillaging Troy. If it had been ended by the duel between Menelaus and Paris, the whole war would have been a failure, from the Argive perspective.

      Women were no more simple commodities when they were major heiresses than was Eleanor Of The Aquitaine a simple commodity in the Middle Ages.

      And Helen gave really good head.

    6. Re:Artistic License (or Homer's Poor Choices) by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Poseidon, the patron God of Troy, created the horse and it was common for sailors to make a effigy of a horse and leave on the shore before a long voyage to win Poseidon's favor. So when Troy finds the Greek armada gone and this horse statue on the shore, the assumed they'd given up and left. They took the horse statue back to their main temple because that's what you do with offerings. And of course Poseidon, incensed that Odysseus would take advantage of his followers like this spent the next 20 years making life hell for him.

    7. Re:Artistic License (or Homer's Poor Choices) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regarding the cyclops, I don't recall any mention of it NOT having echolocation (eg. perhaps the eye even performed both the visual and echolocation reception tasks, a rather vulnerable single point of failure, but living things tend to have vulnerable points after all).

    8. Re:Artistic License (or Homer's Poor Choices) by ignavus · · Score: 1

      What he is trying to say is, women are complex commodities.

      This is the 21st century. We have moved on from viewing women as simple commodities.

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
    9. Re:Artistic License (or Homer's Poor Choices) by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The cyclops has one eye. A monster with limited depth perception is not too intimidating and wouldn't be a very effective monster.

      When you're forty feet tall swinging a twenty foot club small errors of distance aren't that important.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  46. Quite frankly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a pretty lame list, in a "Well duh, no shit Sherlock" sort of way. Here are some better ones to think about:

    Star Destroyer bridge towers. Sure, the view is nice, but even with armour and shields, it still makes more sense to bury it deep within the hull.

    Stormtrooper Armour: a lot of body armour in the real world will not stop a high-velocity rifle round, but will protect you from shrapnel, shell splinters, fragmentation, and other hazards. Anytime someone creates a new kind of armour, someone creates a weapon to penetrate it. The main problem with Stormtrooper armour is the lack of standard camouflage, and their bulk. But as we saw in Episode III (much as I disregard their presence), they DO use camouflage. So that leaves their physical bulk. Personally, I always preferred the scout troopers, because they had more freedom of movement. Too bad the helmet had no peripheral vision.

  47. Blasters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In particular, the point on the blasters is just fallacious.

    Blaster fire is made up of the same as lightsabers: plasma traveling inside a moving electromagnetic field. This would inevitably be very loud (not in space, admittedly), as the plasma ignited local atmosphere. It also explains why they bounce off of lightsabers, why you can see them, and why they are slow (they can only move as quickly as the stable magnetic field can propagate; em drift in current wires is on the order of a few cm/hour, so compared to this, blasters travel extremely quickly).

    A much stronger counterpoint is that blaster fire and lightsabers could be easily repelled by strong magnets. In particular, it would not be incredibly difficult to override the electromagnetic field containing a lightsaber, and reorient the plasma to somewhere intersecting with its wielder.

  48. How many storm troopers ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... can dance on the head of a pin? Have you thought about that?

  49. A couple of points by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 1

    R2-D2 - Meh, I don't see why you'd need a droid who was built to interface with ships directly and only speak to people via the ship's computer to have the ability to speak.
    C-3P0 - Why is the protocol droid, a droid built for the purpose of translating things without any military coding a coward? I don't know, maybe because he's not stupid? Put yourself in the situations that 3P0 gets into and tell me you wouldn't be scared
    Lightsabers - There are lightsabers with handguards in the EU, but for the most part there's no need for them. When you can sense your opponent trying to slide the lightsaber down to get your fingers a few seconds before they do there's plenty of time to react.
    Blasters - I agree with all of his assessments, but he misses the point. Blasters do insane damage, enough to burn through stormtrooper armor (which would almost certainly block a bullet) in a single shot. That's a good enough reason to use them, after all guns are incredibly loud and the muzzle flash reveals your position but I doubt you'll find anyone arguing that arrows are better.
    Landspeeders - Meh, true enough. I doubt they have safety regulations on Tatooine though, and until recently most cars had none of the stuff that a landspeeder lacks. It's standard sci-fi protocal by now to skip seat-belts :P
    Stormtrooper Armor - Standing out is the point (they're intimidating) and the helmet doesn't restrict view, it offers 360 degree view to those who are trained in its use. Luke didn't know how to turn it on so he got the standard no peripherals view
    Death Star II - The path was because the station wasn't finished yet
    Sarlaac - Tack on the fact that it can eat the same meal for 1000 years. Jabba's sarlacc must have been full all the time
    Asteroid Worm - It's main foodsources are asteroid minerals (which it gets from being in the asteroid) and mynocks. Ships are just a delicacy that it eats when it can
    Midi-Chlorians - True enough, that was one of the dumbest things ever introduced to the Star Wars universe (especially since methods of detecting high force-sensitivity already existed in the EU. Why none of them was used is beyond me.

    --
    There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
    1. Re:A couple of points by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      >"R2-D2 - Meh, I don't see why you'd need a droid who was built to interface with ships directly and only speak to people via the ship's computer to have the ability to speak."

      Well he can *understand* speech so he's obviously designed to communicate with humans.

      Speech recognition is a zilion times harder than synthesis, so...

      --
      No sig today...
  50. Dumbest...article...EVER. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey! Lets go back to 1977 and make the movie to rigorous, scientifically accurate standards. Gee, isn't that better? No, it utterly SUCKS now, because you have drained all the striking originality and surprise out of it, but do you get that? NO, because you are a walking imagination-free zone shaped exactly like an idiot.

    Give me back the time it took to read this article.

  51. Re:that's fucking great! Mod parent up by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

    I know this guy, he's pretty cool and does a local internet radio show. He has a bunch more stuff on his site. If you found that one funny check out the others.

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  52. C3PO by VAXcat · · Score: 1

    I always thought the obvious influence for the character of C3PO was Ambassador Magnan from Keith Laumer's Retief stories.

    --
    There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
  53. Mod parent up by ProteusQ · · Score: 1

    SW is supposed to be space opera -- i.e., what laws of physics? What rules of design? What about sound waves in space?

    Does this blogger realize who long dying opera characters can keep singing, for pete's sake?

  54. Paging Dr. Freud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FTA: you have to wonder why stormtroopers don't just walk around naked, save for blinders and flip-flops.

    Scalzi may have just revealed more about himself that he intended. This also explainss his obsession with the Death Star's exhaust port and the Emperor's "huge exposed shaft"...

    NTTAWWT

  55. rebuttals by v1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1) hiltless light sabors

    1R) looking back at all the movies, I have NEVER seen anyone slide a light sabor across another. I speculate that there's something about the blade of a sabor that has a very high resistance on another similar blade. Every time they clash, they always have to withdraw to swing again. So in that respect, a hilt is pointless.

    2) poorly designed blasters

    2R) getting back to the unknowns, I think we can safely assume despite the appearance, they're not shooting lasers. Whatever it is, (plasma?) it's probably going as fast as it can as a projectile. And the sound it makes may be a factor of what it is. How silent is winging a blob of plasma? One thing they have going for them is I haven't ever seen anyone with a blaster run out of ammo or sport a bandolier.

    3) unshielded exhaust port leading directly to the central reactor

    3R) considering how icky the stuff coming OUT of a reactor exhaust port probably is, it's not too surprising if it's hard to put a shield around. (you certainly don't want to keep it IN, and most people aren't interested in getting TO it) And they did say it was small. (3M?) Consider the size of the deathstar. That's like a pinhole in a buick. Would a pinhole in your car worry you? And DS2 wasn't even 60% complete, it's no wonder there were some open shafts still in it, to get materials installed. DS2 was also relying on the planet based shield generator to keep it safe from attack.

    4) stormtrooper uniforms

    4R) I was thinking about this, and they do seem to suck for blaster-resistance. But then blasters seem to shoot through just about anything short of walls, so there may not be a point to trying to stop it. And I don't see them as bulletproof, they're more for trauma resistance, against people with bladed or blunt weapons, maybe primatives. (tho they had problems with ewoks...) Luke couldn't see well out of his helmet, but remember "aren't you a little short for a storm tropper?" He was wearing gear for someone a lot taller than him, he was probably looking out the nosehole.

    5) Star Destroyer bridge towers

    5R) that's hard to defend. We'll just give you that one. But then look at say the older aircraft carriers with the brdige up on top? I believe they've moved those to the bowels of the ship, but they didn't used to be there. In that time though they needed to be able to see the battlefield, but with electronics and screens now that's just a bad idea.

    6) R2D2 can't talk

    6R) he talks with luke via the display in his cockpit just fine. He's designed to plug into the back of the xwing and fix things, or move about inside a larger ship and fix things. Why should he need to talk to anyone any other time? His legs are only there as a convenience so they don't have to get out a dolly to move him from one ship to another or around the inside to get where he needs to fix stuff. He's a mechanic, not a conversationalist. Try chatting with a mechanic while he tries to change your alternator, he'll probably tell you to go read a magazine in the lounge and get out of his hair.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:rebuttals by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      3R) considering how icky the stuff coming OUT of a reactor exhaust port probably is, it's not too surprising if it's hard to put a shield around. (you certainly don't want to keep it IN, and most people aren't interested in getting TO it)

      The thermal exhaust port is said to be "ray-shielded, but not particle-shielded", which meant using proton torpedoes to hit it. I always interpreted that to mean that whatever the "thermal exhaust" consisted of dictated the type of shielding needed.

    2. Re:rebuttals by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Isn't there a scene where someone's (Han's?) blaster runs out of charge? I may be imagining things. But it makes sense that they carry a LOT of charge, compared to a projectile weapon where sheer mass is a problem.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:rebuttals by v1 · · Score: 1

      The thermal exhaust port is said to be "ray-shielded, but not particle-shielded"

      What that means is a ray (blaster or higher caliber of same from fighter ship) can't get through, but particles (objects... torpedoes) can.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  56. What about slugs getting hot for ape females? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    From TFA:

    R2-D2
    Sure, he's cute, but the flaws in his design are obvious the first time he approaches anything but the shallowest of stairs. Also: He has jets, a periscope, a taser and oil canisters to make enforcer droids fall about in slapsticky fashion -- and no voice synthesizer. Imagine that design conversation: "Yes, we can afford slapstick oil and tasers, but we'll never get a 30-cent voice chip past accounting. That's just madness."

    In the first movie, he's climbing down stairs. He can go up and down any normal stairs -- I wouldn't presume shallow.

    But I do agree the rockets are stupid. Even within the Star Wars universe, they're stupid. They have passes the rocket stage and have gravitational and levitational equipment.

    R2 was cuter using his built-in maintenance droid utilities like the little round saw. Turning him into a James Bond car was just silly.

    As for his "voice chip", he already has one! His language is just the beeps and boops language, a language that must be fairly common around the galaxy because most people can understand him. And he understands what people say. So it's a non-issue that he doesn't speak English-qua-Galactic Common.

    C-3PO
    Can't fully extend his arms; has a bunch of exposed wiring in his abs; walks and runs as if he has the droid equivalent of arthritis. And you say, well, he was put together by an eight-year-old. Yes, but a trip to the nearest Radio Shack would fix that. Also, I'm still waiting to hear the rationale for making a protocol droid a shrieking coward, aside from George Lucas rummaging through a box of offensive stereotypes (which he'd later return to while building Jar-Jar Binks) and picking out the "mincing gay man" module.

    I don't know why everyone thinks The Brat invented the Goldenrod(tm) brand of droid. It seemed obvious to me that The Brat was just re-assembling one from a bunch of parts of several. After all, who the hell puts into production something assembled by a kid? Did the kid somehow whip up the whole "protocol" part of it as software, while he was at it? Didn't anyone think of a pretty, polished, gold robot for state functions before? Which is obviously not what was on the kid's mind.

    No, The Brat just put a Goldenrod together from the junked parts of several others.

    As for the design defects, this is the future and exposed wiring is hardened against water and whatnot.

    Lightsabers
    Yes, I know, I want one too. But I tell you what: I want one with a hand guard. Otherwise every lightsaber battle would consist of sabers clashing and then their owners sliding as quickly as possible down the shaft to lop off their opponent's fingers. You say: Lightsabers can slice through anything but another lightsaber, so what are you going to make a hand guard out of? I say: Dude, if you have the technology to make a lightsaber, you have the technology to make a light hand guard.

    True, but then you'd have to avoid your own handguard as well as the blade itself. I can technobabble it away, though. Light saber blades don't slide well against each other. Hence no need for a handguard.

    Sarlaac
    A monstrous yet immobile creature who lives in an exposed pit in the middle of a lifeless desert, waiting for large animals to apparently feel suicidal and trek out to throw themselves in? Yeah, not so much. Not every Sarlaac can count on an intergalactic mob boss to feed it tidbits.

    I wondered at the time where 3PO relates the description of victims, "...where you will be slowly digested over a thousand years." I was like, "Cool! It extends your life by way over ten times!"

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re:What about slugs getting hot for ape females? by prockcore · · Score: 1

      I wondered at the time where 3PO relates the description of victims, "...where you will be slowly digested over a thousand years." I was like, "Cool! It extends your life by way over ten times!"

      I'm not sure why the Star Wars Universe, would use the time it takes for the Earth to orbit our Sun as a standard measurement of time. We have no idea how long a year is for them. Could be 2 hours.

    2. Re:What about slugs getting hot for ape females? by Steve001 · · Score: 1

      prockcore wrote:

      I'm not sure why the Star Wars Universe, would use the time it takes for the Earth to orbit our Sun as a standard measurement of time. We have no idea how long a year is for them. Could be 2 hours.

      It would depend on what it is based on.

      • Possiblity One: It is an already established measure based on a government edict. Since there are so many different planets with years and days that are of different lengths, the Republic could have just said that the standard universal year is this length of time (based on some unchanging universal standard such as the vibration of a quartz crystal).
      • Possibility Two: The official standard year is based on Coresant itself (if it orbits a star). How long that year is would depend on the size of the planet (the more massive the planet, the longer its year). It is much like in our star system, Mercury's year is much shorter than ours.
  57. Real life is messy and sub-optimal... by GameMaster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ok, I'll be the first to admit that Lucas isn't the best designer in the world, and that the prequels sucked, but most of the points brought up are kinda garbage.

    • R2-D2:
      • Stairs aren't a problem when you're original design included jets.
      • The "slapstick" oil could have, simply, been a standard coolant/lubricant drain.
      • The voice is an issue, but we don't really know what species designed that model of robot. Perhaps they can understand the chirps he makes. Since he's a technical component and not a protocol droid he would have no need for a large collection of languages.
    • C3PO:
      • He wasn't just put together by an eight year old, he was put together by an eight year old slave using scrap parts.
      • As has been pointed out by others here, he's intended to be a "protocol droid" which implies that he's meant to, primarily, focus on things like knowing proper etiquette for a situation and language translation. The need for him to have more than basic mobility/flexibility would be non-existent. The fact that Anikan says he built the droid to help his mother do chores could simply mean that he's making do with a sub-optimal helper for his mom because of the limited source of parts he can scavenge.
      • The comments about C3-P0's personality are 100% opinion base and have no real justification. It's not unreasonable to expect that servant robots might be designed with an effeminate personality in order to look more subservient to their wealth masters pair that with the fact that we don't know how much impact the eight year old builder might have had on it and it could, easily, end up being a poor stereotype as seen through the eyes of an eight year old.
    • Lightsaber
      • Since we don't know how to build a real lightsaber, we don't know how they react when they come into contact with each other (other than the fact that they can't pass through each other). For all we know, two lightsabers coming into contact with each other may create a form of electrostatic friction with each other that stops people from sliding the two "blades" along each other. That would make a blade guard unnecessary.
    • Blaster
      • There is nothing about the blaster that, necessarily, implies that it's firing light beams. In fact, the slow speed the author ridicules implies that it might be some form of super-heated plasma ball.
      • As for dodging them, the movies never gave me the impression that they moved all that slow. They seemed, to me, to move no slower than traditional tracer rounds. The only people I saw being show to react fact enough to "dodge" individual rounds were the Jedi characters who are, specifically, supposed to posses super-human reflexes. Plenty of people dodged when they were fired at, but even people in real life respond, ineffectively, when bullets are wizzing past their heads.
    • Landspeeders, etc.
      • As others have pointed out, Luke is supposed to be a poor farmer's adopted child and a crack pilot. Poor farmers, the world over, drive far worse (and less safe) vehicles that a Yugo. The idea that he "hot dogs" it without seat belts isn't so hard to believe in that context.
    • Stormtrooper Armor
      • It may have been designed to protect more against physical attacks more than blasters since, without the armor, the troops might be even more susceptible to injury. This would lead to a situation, like in the Dune novels, where a whole class of weapons would become useless (in this case physical weapons like clubs and bullets) and only the most advanced of enemies have the technology to be any kind of threat (or, in the case of the Dune novels, the skill level/training to use a bladed weapon to get through the personal energy shields).
      • Perhaps the armor protects them more than we see in the movie. Just because they fall down when shot, doesn't mean that they're, necessarily, dead. In real life, the best "bullet-proof" tactical armo
    --

    Rules of Conduct:
    #1 - The DM is always right.
    #2 - If the DM is wrong, see rule #1
    1. Re:Real life is messy and sub-optimal... by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      In my mind, I've simply decided that the midichlorians themselves don't give the powers, but rather a secondary effect of whatever the Force actually is. Basically, they're critters that are attracted to Force, so if you have more Force you have more midichlorians.

      Actually, getting deeper into this - maybe Force is the manifestation of energy that comes from a universe higher up than the one Star Wars takes place in. It's literally inexplicable because to understand it you'd have to be part of that higher order universe. Midichlorians could be the critters that feed on Force in that higher order universe, and they have components that appear in the lower order universe that we see in the films. Because Force and whatever the Midichlorians happen to be are in an entirely different universe, one that is by definition impossible to explain, the Jedi can't come up with a perfect theory for them, and also simply transferring them from one person to another won't do anything but piss them off and make them leave to go find a better source.

      Jedi and Sith individuals, being loci for the Force, are sensitive to this extra-universal energy and can use it to alter the laws of physics on a localized basis, leading to all kinds of special abilities. Telekinesis and super speed/reflexes are trivial to explain away. Mind tricks and seeing the future can be explained - in that higher order universe, time is just a physical dimension that can be moved through at will, where all possible futures for the lower order universes can be examined. The Jedi or Sith just "copies and pastes" a mind-state from an alternate universe onto their victim - a mind-state in which the victim made the choice the Jedi or Sith wants them to make. Some species may not exist in alternate universes, or maybe they have some sort of quantum connection to all their other minds, and thus they are immune. Reading the future is easy - they just get glimpses of possible/likely futures from the one above 'em.

      It takes a LOT of training to be any good at that stuff - similar to biofeedback techniques in our world. Most people can, if they practice a lot, make their blood pressure rise or fall a little bit with biofeedback training; they don't know *how* they're doing it, but by doing it over and over they get better and better at it. Some people get REALLY good at it and can raise or lower their body temperature a bit, change their pulse, etc. - but that takes decades of discipline. The Jedi and Sith get their powers the same way - they learn over time how to make certain things happen, first it's difficult, but as they get better it becomes easier and they're able to do more stuff, eventually doing it almost by reflex.

      All of the above might seem excessive, but dammit, I needed to find some way to make midichlorians not suck!

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    2. Re:Real life is messy and sub-optimal... by cstacy · · Score: 1

      For all we know, two lightsabers coming into contact with each other may create a form of electrostatic friction with each other that stops people from sliding the two "blades" along each other. That would make a blade guard unnecessary.

      I think that a major skill component in lightsabre duels is the (Force) anticipation of when to continue pressing (to block) vs. when to withdraw your connected blades for another strike.

      Sort of like the game where you put your palms against your opponents palms, horizontally in between you both, and see who can remove their hands to bitch slap first.

    3. Re:Real life is messy and sub-optimal... by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      Let me preface this by saying that I HATE the midi-chlorian explanation of the force but, that said, it's still, technically, reasonable.

      This reminded me of Jack L. Chalker's "Four Lord of the Diamond" series. Seemed completely out-of-place in Star Wars, though.

    4. Re:Real life is messy and sub-optimal... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      "Midichlorians could be the critters that feed on Force in that higher order universe, and they have components that appear in the lower order universe that we see in the films."

      So ... maybe the Force, as used by Sith/Jedi, is really a midichlorian waste product?

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    5. Re:Real life is messy and sub-optimal... by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      No, no - the midichlorians are just like, say, critters around a food source - they're an indicator that something is there, but they are not the actual food source. By counting the number, you can tell how big the food source might be, but you aren't actually measuring it.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    6. Re:Real life is messy and sub-optimal... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      As, so they're actually parasites? That probably makes the best sense of any explanation thus far!

      In the previous post I was thinking that maybe they were like the bacteria in our guts that actually digest our food and produce most of the vitamins we then absorb... well, I suppose m/c could be a symbiote or system stimulus (as some parasites are in the Real World[tm]).

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  58. Children, calm down... by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 1

    It seems that the writer of the article is a Star Wars fan poking a little bit of fun at something he holds dear to him. That being said, we all know that Star Wars is obscenely unrealistic, realism is not the point! Star Wars is not trying to be hard sci-fi ala 2001 or Blade Runner, it is an epic adventure/fantasy/spaghetti western that happens to take place in outer space. The point of Star Wars is to tell a great story with great characters and to have a lot of fun along the way, at which is succeeds marvelously (well, at least until 1999 or so). If you start trying to make sense of the science, you have already missed the point. If we are talking about Star Trek, please tear the science apart, it is presented to give the impression that at least certain parts of it are scientifically plausible (calm down fanboys, I love both equally but they cover very different ground). But knocking Star Wars for being unscientific is like berating the Flintstones for showing humans and people together.

    --
    To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    1. Re:Children, calm down... by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Star Wars is fiction.

      I accept that the fictional universe contains flaws from our point of view, but without the flaws where would the story go?

      And don't forget that in modern society we often have flaws too. When the electricity fails it grinds to a standstill. The few people who suffer the least then are those who haven't modernized but are still having a stove that burns firewood in the kitchen (even though they have also added an electrical)

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  59. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh c'mon this blog looks like it has been copied from some chapter of "The Big Bang Theory". Too uber-geek for me, yikes...

    Anyway, why you care about voice chips and lightsabers and say nothing against the disgustingly cute Ewoks and Jar Jar Binks (they all give me the creeps). And I don't think they are "design" flaws, cause I dont't think "intelligent design" has anything to do with the Star Wars universe (nor THIS universe either....and yes, I don't think Texas is in THIS universe anymore :P )

  60. So... by Mnemen · · Score: 1

    So I haven't quite gotten through all of the posts yet, cause wow....there are a lot, but has anyone thought to tell this John Scalzi guy that it's a movie. Maybe introduce him to the concept of suspension of disbelief for the purpose of entertainment. I mean really most movies that aren't documentaries can be torn apart for being unrealistic or next to impossible, but the point of the movie was to entertain and tell a story, to rip it a part just takes away from the entertainment aspect of the movie...IMHO

    1. Re:So... by zakur · · Score: 1

      I'm sure Scalzi realizes it's a movie. The article is on AMC, after all. Also, he's written a book about sci-fi movies that includes Episodes IV & V on a list of the most significant SF films of all time. "Ripping apart" the bad science in a science fiction film does not take away from the entertainment aspect of it. In fact, I would argue that it actually adds to the entertainment aspect (at least for those of us who don't turn our brains off when we walk into a theater). My favorite SF film of all time is "Aliens" and that's got some scientific whoppers in it as well. Suspension of disbelief is one thing, but some of the logical contortions fanboi apologists are making in this thread are just pathetic.

    2. Re:So... by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      And he has written some Science Fiction books too, like Old Man's War which was nominated for a Hugo award.

      I suspect that the blog entry is a flamebait more than anything else to see the reaction of people. Maybe he needs to bait people a bit to get material for a new book.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    3. Re:So... by Mnemen · · Score: 1

      I hesitate to respond because I am sure you weren't meaning to flame my original post or anything and I am not looking to argue, but I do feel I need to point out that suspension of disbelief is not turning our brains off, it's simply acknowledging that something in the story is improbable or impossible yet is purposely overlooked for the enjoyment of the story. As you said though, maybe some will find disproving the science entertaining. I know people that purposely rip apart story plots. I guess it is what it is, and as stated it was just my opinion. I do tend to side with Zoolook though when he stated that the main article itself was probably intended as a flamebait.

    4. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or perhaps he gets paid to write on the AMC blog and his corporate overlords love it when places like slashdot link to his articles?

  61. More Items for Consideration. by Webcommando · · Score: 1

    I think the parent did point out how you can overcome some of the criticisms.

    My pet peeves have always been:

    1) Battle droids that appear to have been built out of balsa wood. Maybe this is showing quantity vs. quality fallacy...but even the Sherman in WWII wouldn't fall apart that easily when facing a Tiger.

    2) Land crafts and ships that travel far too fast for actually being able to control. I know cinematically it is interesting but it was really hard to watch the speeder bikes and flying car sequences. Perhaps they have really fancy control systems... Note: what happens in Star Wars is far different from modern jet combat where speed and control system make sense.

    3) Gratuitous variety. Most everything needs to be unique or different in SW. Nearly every ship is different, every building, every planet. I guess in this galaxy mass production is frowned upon and ships are built by skilled carriage builders. Forgive the hyperbole..I know there are exceptions (filghts of X-Wings, droids, etc.) Cool from a special effects and visual experience but I've seen plenty of futuristic movies that have some design commonality and I never once thought "Why aren't all the cars on the road unique?"

    Probably others but haven't watched the movies in quite sometime.

    --
    I love the sound of distortion in the morning -- webcommando
  62. Check his library card by jd2112 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Perhaps Anakin told the librarian bot at the Tatooine Public Library 'I want every language translation (book/tape/disk/whatever) you have' and imported them all into C3P0's memory. By the time the copyright cops caught up with him he had become Darth Vader so they let him go as a matter of professional courtesy (sort of how sharks don't bite lawyers)

    --
    Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
  63. Failed Biological Design, too by cashman73 · · Score: 1

    Not only the engineering stuff, but looking at a creature like Jar Jar Binks,. . . that's a walking contradiction to Darwin's Theory of Evolution right there, not to mention a Darwin-Award-waiting-to-happen,. . . And Jabba the Hut seems to fail miserably in the "survival of the fittest" category! How a fat slug of a creature like that could not only climb above the food chain on Tatooine, but also manage to squeak through it's political structure, is a complete mystery! ;-)

  64. If R2 Spoke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If R2 spoke, they would have gotten an R rating. I believe that most of the time, he is screaming obscenities at all of the other characters." -Justme

  65. The empires it department sucks! by steak · · Score: 1

    here are my thoughts on the subject.

    http://zeos386sx.blogspot.com/2005/11/repulicempires-it-department-sucks.html

    not that any of this detracts from the awesomeness of episodes 4,5,6.

  66. Design by committee by GreatRedShark · · Score: 1

    I can believe the bad design choices of R2D2 and C3P0 if they were designed by committees. Nothing ruins a good design more than lots and lots of meetings and demands for consensus and compromises.

    It probably went something like this:
    Engineer 1: "So the demo's all ready to go. Did you guys finish the voice synth integration?"
    Engineer 2: "Uhh yeah.... so actually, they cut that from the project."
    Engineer 1: "WTF?!?!?"
    Engineer 2: "Management said that testing time would take too long and we'd miss the product launch deadline for this holiday season so they told us to scrap it."
    Engineer 1: "What? How is this machine supposed to communicate?"
    Engineer 2: "They said to just leave the diagnostic beeper in with the developer's code manual. The voice chip will be a separately available upgrade in 6 months. Besides, this thing is really just supposed to talk directly to other machines. What's the worst that could happen?"
    Engineer 1: "I'm selling my stocks in this company this afternoon, want to join me?"
    Engineer 2: ".... Yeah I guess so. I hear there's this other awesome project, some kind of moon-sized battleship. It should be fun. Let's check if they're hiring!"

    And I bet that the Death Star problems were due to budget overruns...

  67. What about light saber switches? by deathpulse · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Jedi Knights can move objects with their minds.... yet they fight with what is essentially a flashlight on steroids that has an "on/off" switch. Why don't the smart Jedi just "use the force" to switch off their opponents saber? I guess the argument could be made that the other Jedi would just "use the force" to keep the saber switched on... but wouldn't all saber battles melt down into a concentration battle for who could switch their damn weapon on?

    1. Re:What about light saber switches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm no SW expert but I believe KoToR discussed this. Lightsabers did have switches but used some sort of dead man hand's switch with the force.

      And on the note of using the Force in a battle, I believe that it is the quickest way to the Darkside.

      If anyone had a better explanation, please correct me.

    2. Re:What about light saber switches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, basically it's because fights with glowing swords that cut through almost anything are more cinematically appealing than scenes consisting of two people in robes staring at each-other's hands. Also, appart from the Sith or (rarely) other Jedi, a Jedi's opponent wouldn't be familiar with lightsabers and most wouldn't be Force-users

    3. Re:What about light saber switches? by deathpulse · · Score: 1

      Where this is REALLY grating is when the jedi's fight that 4 armed monster robot guy. Why don't they just turn off his 4 light sabers? Sorry to state the obvious.... if I was a sith, I'd spend less time learning to jump around like a maniac and more time learning to turn stuff off with my mad force powahz.

    4. Re:What about light saber switches? by bckrispi · · Score: 1

      Got a better one... Vader wears the controls to his life support system on the middle of his chest!. The damn thing might as well be a bullseye.

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    5. Re:What about light saber switches? by Ouka · · Score: 1

      They do this to each other with some frequency in the expanded universe novels. Supposedly they train to be able to maintain the concentration to keep their blades activated while doinging their force-assisted acrobatics

    6. Re:What about light saber switches? by deathpulse · · Score: 1

      Soooo..... how do you explain why nobody turned off the robot guys 4 sabers?

    7. Re:What about light saber switches? by Draek · · Score: 1

      My guess was that lightsabers used the user's own Force to power themselves, absorbing it through the handle which is why when jedi were killed, their sabers automatically turned themselves off instead of cutting their way through the floor until they reached open space.

      But I haven't seen the movies in years so dunno how well that theory holds up. Perhaps the Force is just too blunt to reliably manipulate a small, precise object like a switch.

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    8. Re:What about light saber switches? by deathpulse · · Score: 1

      I thought about that too - but Han Solo uses a light saber (to open up that beast on Hoth) and the robot guy uses 4 at a time - neither of them are Jedi.

    9. Re:What about light saber switches? by ImprovOmega · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The script said they couldn't.

    10. Re:What about light saber switches? by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      . but wouldn't all saber battles melt down into a concentration battle for who could switch their damn weapon on?

      How about all that concentration when someone is coming at you with a light saber? How's that for a all-out assault?

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    11. Re:What about light saber switches? by deathpulse · · Score: 1

      I don't think I'd care too much if the light saber was off :).

    12. Re:What about light saber switches? by deathpulse · · Score: 1

      Actually - come to think about it for 3 seconds.... I think I'd probably bring a nice REAL sword with me - turn off the light saber... and use the Jedi's running against him to skewer him. Thats just me though =D.

    13. Re:What about light saber switches? by deathpulse · · Score: 1

      Best reply EVAH!! :) modding up!

    14. Re:What about light saber switches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for a few fight scenes we see in the movies, Jedi usually didn't fight other Jedi. They'd usually fight people who didn't use the force.
      Further, perhaps it takes more concentration to flick a little switch than it does to fight it out. Or maybe each person kept one finger on the on button during the fight?

    15. Re:What about light saber switches? by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      In some of the starwars books and 'lore' this was exactly the case, that the blades were activated by use of the force. This also ensured that they automatically powered down when dropped (but not thrown as the Jedi would hold down the 'on' switch during this act) There were some schools of thought that the energy source itself for the weapon came from the force, and used crystals to focus it. As for handguards, what are you going to make it from that a lightsabre won't cut through? This fact alone surely makes it a pointless exercise in putting them there.

    16. Re:What about light saber switches? by deathpulse · · Score: 1

      How did Han Solo make it work then? Or the RObot guy with 4 arms? They don't have the force.

    17. Re:What about light saber switches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > How did Han Solo make it work then? Or the RObot guy with 4 arms? They don't have the force.

      I don't agree with this particular retroactive explanation, but in any case, the Force is supposed to be in everyone, so it's possible Han used it without realizing he was doing it... and General Grievous is not a robot, but a cyborg.

    18. Re:What about light saber switches? by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      There is much inconsistency in the starwars universe. If you played the PS3 game with Starkiller, you'd see the scene where he dissasembles and reassembles his lightsaber with the force. I'm quite certain that he'd be able to turn it on/off w/o the need for a switch. But the question is, why bother? It was clearly useful for Han to be able to use the lightsaber w/o the need for the force. What will happen if someone not able to use the force steals (or in some other way obtains) your lightsaber, and proceeded to try to attack you with it? I don't see that fight lasting long. Having a switch on the lightsaber is clearly optional, and definitly something that is open to discussion and interpretation. The whole thing is fictional anyway, so I'll not lose any sleep over whether they should or should not have switches...

    19. Re:What about light saber switches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you recall, telekinesis was not added into the bag of Jedi tricks until the second film.

      In the original Star Wars, nobody is moving anything around using only the Force. They could have saved themselves a lot of headaches if they had left it that way.

  68. Big difference : the region they are in by aepervius · · Score: 1

    Venus flytrap : wet region. Prey : small insect relatively easy to find in those region. Sarlac : big ass stuff, which would need a lot of energy jsut to maintain its metabolism, in the middle of a freaking desert where animal of such size should be slightly rare. Put the sarlac scene in the middle of a region with big game, wet savanah, grassland or whatever. But in the desert ? You are kidding me, it is unjustifiable by any means.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:Big difference : the region they are in by agentgonzo · · Score: 1

      It could have got lost on the way to the shops to get some groceries...

    2. Re:Big difference : the region they are in by fumblebruschi · · Score: 1

      The Sarlacc is just a gigantic ant-lion. Since it's sessile it probably doesn't need to eat much (and obviously it makes its food last, since it digests things slowly over a period of a thousand years.) And we see several times that the Tatooine deserts are filled with large animal life.

      Star Wars is a fairy tale. It's not science fiction. It takes place in an imaginary universe where things work differently. (Why didn't Scalzi include on his list, "It's not actually possible to lift large objects with your mind"?)

      Speaking for myself, the only sorts of script problems that really bother me are ones of human motivation, because imaginary universe or not, these are supposed to be real people. I don't want to watch a movie and think, "Wait, he/she wouldn't do that." (Leia sees that the Empire let them escape from the Death Star. So why does she go straight to the rebels' secret base, when she must know that the only reason for the Empire to let them go is to follow them?)

    3. Re:Big difference : the region they are in by raynet · · Score: 1

      Remember not to read Dune.

      --
      - Raynet --> .
    4. Re:Big difference : the region they are in by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Star Wars is a fairy tale. It's not science fiction. It takes place in an imaginary universe where things work differently. (Why didn't Scalzi include on his list, "It's not actually possible to lift large objects with your mind"?)

      Certainly, and Star Wars more than many sci-fi movies never even pretended to be grounded in reality. Most of the technology is made up stuff that might as well be magic, and hey, there's actually magic too. It's space opera, space myth. It's when a movie attempts to make an actual based-on-possible-future-reality claim that their scientific failures are noteworthy. Star Wars never did that, that's why it's a long time ago, and far away, because it's in the land of myth. :)

      Speaking for myself, the only sorts of script problems that really bother me are ones of human motivation, because imaginary universe or not, these are supposed to be real people. I don't want to watch a movie and think,

      Yeah I'm with you on that.

      "Wait, he/she wouldn't do that." (Leia sees that the Empire let them escape from the Death Star. So why does she go straight to the rebels' secret base, when she must know that the only reason for the Empire to let them go is to follow them?)

      Giving Leia the benefit of the doubt and full regard for her brass ovaries? For exactly that reason. With the plans in hand, she wanted the Empire to follow and bring the Death Star to the Alliance, before they had time to think about the ramifications of losing them and fix their weaknesses. She had to have a pretty good idea of what they were looking for in the plans already, because by the time the Empire arrived, she'd found the weakness, created a battle plan, briefed her pilots, and had them ready to launch. She knew the temptation to use the Death Star to achieve a quick and symbolic victory over the Alliance would be too much to resist, and was willing to take a huge risk that the Alliance would be able to pull one out of their ass and blow the fucker up while they had the chance.

      I realize that's reading a lot into the movie, but it does fit her character.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    5. Re:Big difference : the region they are in by fumblebruschi · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. I hadn't thought of that aspect...also, I suppose, the time the Death Star spends chasing the Falcon is time it isn't spending strolling around blowing up inhabited planets.

  69. my signature likes this by rayk_sland · · Score: 1

    (apologies to facebook)

    --
    Jedis are stupid. If they were so powerful, why couldn't they handle counseling for a kid who missed his mom?
  70. Politics by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    The personal touch will always be part of politics (and I'm not referring to employees or young boys or Minneapolis bathrooms.)

    Humans seem to be suckers for it--- couldn't get those two hostages free in North Korea with a Skype chat on Opera with Bill Clinton! Bill had to go in person; showing respect (and courage-- seriously, if they are as nuts as the "news" tells us then its insane to risk a bigger mess when they have Bill as a hostage. So clearly they are not as crazy as we've been told here in the USA...)

  71. Its just a fricken, fun movie by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Dont over-interpret it.

    Two years ago someone posted a 150 PDF about the writing of the Star Wars screenplays, particulalry the first one. And it had morphed all over the place without much thought to world building.

    There are some authors like Toklein and Hal Clement who insist on constructing a detailed world before writing the novel. But that was not Lucas's style in the beginning.

  72. Luke was just too short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always wondered why people used Luke saying "I can't see a thing in this helmet" to justify how bad storm trooper armor is. He is about 5' 6" tall, most storm troopers top 6'. He's not just a little shorter than the average trooper, he is noticeably shorter to the point that remarking on it is the first thing Leia says to him. Just because he couldn't see that well while wearing a suit of armor designed for somebody a half a foot taller than him does not mean that the helmets were poorly designed, the much taller Han doesn't seem to have any difficulties.

  73. How can NO ONE have mentioned this yet? by oneTheory · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Death Star
    An unshielded exhaust port leading directly to the central reactor? Really?

    I searched all the comments for this and not one person correctly pointed out that "The shaft is ray shielded, so you'll have to use proton torpedoes."

    Slashdot, you disappoint me.

    1. Re:How can NO ONE have mentioned this yet? by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      Oops, I commented about this, but hadn't read your comment yet. Yeah, it's explicitly stated during the pre-attack briefing.

    2. Re:How can NO ONE have mentioned this yet? by bckrispi · · Score: 1

      And that even with proton torpedoes, hitting it would be "impossible, even for a computer".

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    3. Re:How can NO ONE have mentioned this yet? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      It can't have been ray shielded, it was a thermal exhaust port, radiation is the only way to reject heat in a vacuum (unless you enjoy losing mass), ergo it wasn't ray shielded. The technician who stated that must have been mistaken.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  74. midi-chlorians by beefubermensch · · Score: 1

    A Hugo-award winning science fiction buff who doesn't realize that midi-chlorians are based on mitochondria? For shame.

    While I would have preferred to leave the Force mysterious, I think midi-chlorians are one of the *best* revisions in the Star Wars universe. Understanding that mitochondria probably started out as bacteria which began living symbiotically with algae -- a symbiosis so successful, they do indeed provide the 'life force' to every eukaryotic organism on the planet.

  75. Thanks for the link. by rantingkitten · · Score: 1

    I found the link to starwars.com in the summary very helpful. Without that, I might not have known what Star Wars is.

    --
    mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
  76. Empire needs an OSHA by awkScooby · · Score: 1

    If the Empire had OSHA, Darth Maul would still be alive today. Handrail technology clearly was known in the Star Wars universe -- even Ewoks had handrail technology. Yet it's surprisingly absent from the more advanced civilizations in the Star Wars universe. As an example, there are numerous stairs on Tatooine with no handrails. And the Death Star, the pinnacle of Empire technology, had numerous bottomless pits without handrails, or any other safety equipment. Clearly the lack of an appropriate regulatory agency is to blame for the sad state of safety in the Start Wars universe. OSHA requires the following for bottomless pits: "Every pit and trapdoor floor opening, infrequently used, shall be guarded by a floor opening cover of standard strength and construction. While the cover is not in place, the pit or trap opening shall be constantly attended by someone or shall be protected on all exposed sides by removable standard railings." Had proper safety equipment been in place at the bottomless pit where Darth Maul flung Obi Wan Kennobi over the side, Obi Wan would have remained in view of Darth Maul, or Obi Wan would have been spotted by the pit attendant, and Obi Wan would not have been able to engage in the sneak attack the lead to Darth Maul's untimely death.

  77. Thermal Management by DarthStrydre · · Score: 1

    The wings in space are potentially there to act as radiators to get rid of excess heat. I know it is a stretch, but possible. "Wings in attack formation" for X-wings spread them out, potentially increasing heat radiation with the expectation that with lasers blasting and larger amounts of maneuvering, there would be more heat loading. Or it might just be to look cool. Or to spread the lasers to an even more unweildy configuration.

  78. On epic phails by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

    "most epic FAILs"

    Why is it that every single nobody in the world thinks that this or that bit or trivia is "epic". Star Wars, the original movie, was probably epic. It ranks up there with ancient epics, like the Hercules stories. (The originals, I mean) But, every booger picking zit faced fool on the planet thinks that he has something "epic" when he writes a blog.

    Come on. The author isn't even an epic failure. He's a nobody, who will be forgotten 30 seconds after I close this window. Not even the Star Wars sequels and ripoffs are epic. Star Wars failures? Oh well - Hercules had some flaws in his universe too, but he managed to entertain people for millenia. THAT is truly epic.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  79. Re:Your grade: C+ by hey! · · Score: 2

    C'mon moderators, are you totally incapable of recognizing irony, even when *labeled* as such?

    I've got to metamoderate more.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  80. Wait until the remake of Star Wars in 2010 by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    Here is a sneak peek if Star Trek can get a reboot/rewrite so can Star Wars.

    Star Wars is a 2010 remake of the classic 1977 science fiction film, Star Wars. The movie features the main characters of the original; however they are portrayed by a new cast in a revamped plot, featuring pioneering, overused special effects. The narrative follows Luke Skywalker (Zac Efron) as he escapes his homeworld of Tatooine and joins Obi-Wan Kenobi (Sean Connery), Han Solo (Dennis Quaid) and Chewbacca (Peter Mayhew) to rescue Princess Leia Organa (Julia Roberts) and her hair (portrayed by two Cinnabons) and save the Rebel Alliance from the evil Darth Vader (Jeremy Irons) and Emperor Palpatine (Ralph Fiennes).

    The remake was made when George Lucas felt a need to revive the Star Wars franchise in a way more graceful than Star Wars: The Clone Wars. Lucas also noticed the recent revival of other old science fiction franchises, such as Star Trek. He felt that a remake of the original Star Wars would be a win-win: he would not have to invent new ideas, but the audience would be treated to a new, revamped, overhyped version of the movie in return for some additional profit for Lucas himself. The remake, unfortunately, fared even worse than The Clone Wars, despite its conspicuous lack of Jar Jar Binks.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:Wait until the remake of Star Wars in 2010 by daveime · · Score: 2, Funny

      despite its conspicuous lack of Jar Jar Binks.

      Joe Pesci didn't like the script ?

  81. TurboLASER by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Large Automated Sensing Emergency Response System.

    Ha, fixed that error^H^H^H^H^H Factual misunderstanding.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  82. The design is great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Poor-design? Did the Bible have poor design choices? No, because it's the Bible. It's like saying 'Froot-Loops don't taste like real fruit' to which the answer is always 'Froot-Loops taste exactly like fresh froot... they taste deliciously froot-like'. It's impossible to have a poor design choice in a fantasy universe that utilizes technologies way beyond the comprehension of ourselves. And one day I will have a lightsabre, fear it minions of evil.

  83. Light saber fencing techniques by DrVomact · · Score: 3, Informative

    I thought the article was really funny. However, it's clear that Scalzi hasn't spent much time fencing. Real fighting with an edged weapon is nothing like theatrical fencing—which is what Scalzi is apparently thinking of.

    In theatrical fencing, the idea is to simulate a real fight without actually risking injury to the actors, who are usually not wearing fencing masks. Thus, there's a great deal of jumping around and clashing of blades. In a real fight (or even a saber fencing bout), there's only two reasons why the combatant's blades would ever come into contact: either they are parrying, or they are trying to beat their opponent's weapon out of line to create an opening. Usually, the contact of blade on blade is only momentary—you want your blade free to move at all times.

    There is one exception to this. Sometimes, a parry or beat will result in a "bind"—a maneuver something like arm-wrestling, the purpose of which is to get the upper hand through main force by pushing your opponent's weapon out of the way. Because you are pushing against his blade, friction and the angle of the forces involved prevent your blade from "sliding" down to his hand. In any case, there are well-known maneuvers for disengaging from an unwanted bind.

    In a light-saber battle, your primary targets would probably be your opponent's hand and wrist, just as it is in epee and saber fencing today. This is not because you "slide down the blade" of your opponent, but for the simple reason that the hand holding the saber is the part of your opponent that is closest to you. It could be argued that hand guards like those found on contemporary epees or sabers would be a good idea for these fictional weapons...but then you might as well go for full body armor.

    If I were going to object to the light-saber battles in Star Wars on grounds of realism, it would be that they last far too long. A real battle with nearly weightless edged weapons that can cut through anything shouldn't last more than 10 seconds.

    --
    Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
    1. Re:Light saber fencing techniques by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      In a light-saber battle, your primary targets would probably be your opponent's hand and wrist, just as it is in epee and saber fencing today.

      So you wield your epee or saber two-handed eh?

      Lightsaber fighting (in the movies) was based on Kendo. Not Western fencing styles.

      Mark Hamil got Kendo lessons in preparation for this.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    2. Re:Light saber fencing techniques by bckrispi · · Score: 1

      There is one exception to this. Sometimes, a parry or beat will result in a "bind"--a maneuver something like arm-wrestling, the purpose of which is to get the upper hand through main force by pushing your opponent's weapon out of the way. Because you are pushing against his blade, friction and the angle of the forces involved prevent your blade from "sliding" down to his hand. In any case, there are well-known maneuvers for disengaging from an unwanted bind.

      Interestingly, it was a bind that nearly got Obi-wan killed in both of the first two prequels. When he locked sabers with Darth Maul, Maul used his imbalance to force-propel him into the reactor pit. When he fought Dooku the first time, he bound his blade (again) and Dooku simply pulled back and took Obi-wan's leg out from under him (nearly severing it).

      Apparently, Obi-wan had learned his lesson by "Sith". At the very end of his fight with Vader, he found his saber locked yet again. But instead of trying to push through, he leapt backwards (just as Vader was about to make a killing-blow) and was able to take the high ground.

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
  84. AT-AT anyone?? by mfnickster · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised he didn't mention the AT-ATs. One of the commenters on the blog did.

    These things are ridiculous! High center of gravity, vulnerable and complex means of locomotion... and ask Pink Five pointed out, "they only have guns in the front, right? So just, like, don't fly in FRONT of them!"

    And I always wondered why a single speeder was able to destroy one once it was toppled, but for some reason it's invincible while upright??

    --
    "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
    1. Re:AT-AT anyone?? by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      High center of gravity, vulnerable and complex means of locomotion...

      You mean, like a human? Lots of engineering is subconsciously based on biology; either our own or that observed in nature. I guarantee you if the Army could figure out an efficient way to make a walking tank, we'd have one.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    2. Re:AT-AT anyone?? by mfnickster · · Score: 1

      High center of gravity, vulnerable and complex means of locomotion...

      You mean, like a human? Lots of engineering is subconsciously based on biology; either our own or that observed in nature.

      Yep... and you'll notice they don't train humans to walk into battle fully upright anymore. They used to, back when the rules of war meant marching your troops in rank and file straight toward the enemy. That was a tactic left over from the days before firearms, and of course, what happened is exactly what you'd expect: lots of men getting shot and falling over.

      I guarantee you if the Army could figure out an efficient way to make a walking tank, we'd have one.

      Perhaps, but it would be low to the ground and would have some armor over the "legs".

      --
      "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
  85. The REAL reasons, IT IS A MOVIE! by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    R2D2

    He is a comic effect character, his non-speech is a great writing trick in that it allows him to say the greatest lines, without them ever having to be written. It is a similar trick to the never seen characters in tv. They can be ANYTHING because they never have to be real.

    C-3PO

    The other half of the comedy paring. He is the talker and plays the role of the well english aristrocate who is utterly useless but by being such a poofter allows everyone else to be really macho. If you want a really spicy sauce, add some sugar. He walks like he does and looks the way he does because the people who build him had to come up with a design that could be worn by a human yet not look like all the REALLY gigantic and unwieldy man-inside-a-plastic-suit-robots that had come before. R2-D2 and C-3PO might look crappy and make little practical sense, but have you actually watched robots of previous movies? Or even of movies like Battlestar Galactica and The Black Hole?

    Lightsabers.

    Lucas wanted sword fights because they look cool. Regular swords wouldn't look very sci-fi and flaming swords would look even less sci-fi. Light-sabers look cool. They have no other reason. As for hand guards, that would have ruined the futuristic look. There are only so many hand-guard designs you could come up with and any of them would look like an existing design ruining the notion that this adventure is taking place in another universe. Remember, unlike say LoTR or Star Trek, EARTH DOES NOT EXIST. The lightsaber is designed the way it is designed for no other reason then to look sci-fi and not like a futuristic version of a saber or samuri-sword or whatever.

    Blasters.

    They don't shoot light because a concentrated beam of light does a lot of damage, it shoots light because it looks cool. The effect is similar to watching a gun battle with tracer rounds. It is the same reason why bullets spark when they hit steel, because just wathing some small holes appear in a car is boring. They make a sound, because you don't sit in a theather with massive boxes to watch a silent flick. It is the same reason star ships make a sound. It isn't for any reason other then to give the audience something to listen to. People see guns, they expect bangs. Just like in Star Trek the transporter whines (this is explained in a later book as being a carrier wave that apparently give a minute improvement to the safety, the klingons don't have it. Yes this is after the fact science mumbo-jumbo but the original reason was simple, it sounds better)

    Landspeeders.

    Now he is REALLY reaching. Lucas is A: an american, a country that hates seatbelts and B: he forgets that on motor cycles you don't wear seat belts either. Seatbelts are boring and in the era the movie was made they were rarely worn by characters in any vehicle. Come on, I can come up with better crap then this (and will)

    Storm troopers.

    The in universe idea behind the uniforms is to make for a faceless, anonymous killing machine to inspire fear through intimidation. You can kill a hundred storm troopers and you would never know as a hundred identical ones take his place. The real reason however is simple, lucas needed a cheap uniform that looked nothing like anything else and could completly hide the actor inside so he could interchange them and re-use them. He could see dozens "die" and next scene the same actors are there again and the audience never notices. It is brilliant. Remember, a new hope was made on a budget. The proof of lucas brilliance? A storm trooper uniform is about the only uniform a sci-fi festival attendee doesn't look like a total dork in, but actually a bit like a real (if impractically equipped soldier).

    The Death Star

    It is called a MORAL you idiot. David vs Goliath. That the biggest can be felled by the smallest. Does this guy GET story telling? At ALL? Did he whine that there is no way any prince would kiss a woman who hasn't had a bath in 100 years (sl

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  86. What popular sci-fi movies AREN'T guilty of this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of complaining about Star Wars, look into the common sci-fi universe (particularly in movies) which are not only incredible, but not internally consistent. Once you star picking nits, you'll realise that Stargate has more in common with The Jetsons than with reasonable forecasts of science and technology. That's why pop sci-fi BORES me. I'd much rather read 'speculative fiction', which is internaly consistent and doesn't depart to greatly from what we now know to be true. A future which logically follows the present. I would enjoy working on defining the 'reality' of a speculative future, in which I could have my characters live and my plots play out. I am now working on such a near future, in which man travels to nearby star systems, but at sub-light speeds and hasn't encountered any aliens. If anyone cares to see what I hae in mind, check out http://realisticinterstellartravel.blogspot.com

     

  87. Completely Disenchanted. by No-Cool-Nickname · · Score: 0

    In the future, I will never appreciate a piece of fiction unless it is 100% scientifically accurate.

    1. Re:Completely Disenchanted. by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      That would be why it would be called "science" fiction. Which Star Wars pretends to be, or at least its fan base believes it is.

      If it ain't scientifically accurate, it's schlock 'sci-fi' or just plain fantasy.

    2. Re:Completely Disenchanted. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be why it would be called "science" fiction. Which Star Wars pretends to be, or at least its fan base believes it is.

      If it ain't scientifically accurate, it's schlock 'sci-fi' or just plain fantasy.

      Does that mean Dune (presence), I, Robot (AI), H2G2 (Infinite Improbability Engine), 2001 (obelisk), Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep (genetic engineered life), Starship Troopers (space travel)... etc, etc, etc... are schlock 'sci-fi'

      That's a pretty lame definition.

  88. Very insightful by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    ..but there is one problem. SW isn't science fiction, its fantasy (and possibly space opera to boot). A lot of the so called 'science fiction' stories that people love to bash for being utterly scientifically silly aren't actually sci-fi.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  89. In space, only the keen eard can hear you scream by TiggertheMad · · Score: 3, Interesting

    No sounds do not exist in space, even though many think it does.

    Wrong. Sound is pressure waves that propagate through a medium. Space is not an absolute vacuum, just a very, very, very thin medium. So, sound would exist, but it would dissipate very quickly, and it would have to be VERY loud to be heard at any distance.

    Yes, sound would not exist in space as you see it in the movies, but saying that it doesn't exist at all is just as inaccurate.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  90. Star Wars is Space Opera by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used to play an RPG called GURPS that separated sci-fi genres into the hard science fiction and space opera. Space opera is swashbuckling, shoot-from-the-hip adventures more focused on the action than appeasing the Trekkies' need to know how object X actually functions. The design of things like C3PO and R2-D2 is purely based on their story impact. One being the "adult" and one being the "child." AT-ATs were lumbering mechanical beast trudging along and unstoppable. The lack of a hand guard added to the danger and respect you have for a jedi's skills. Trying to apply real-world rules and ergonomics to fantasy is just silly.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  91. It was designed for kids by AnalPerfume · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All movies are designed visually, with any attention to science as an afterthought. Star Wars was designed for kids, so it's all kid-friendly droids, easy to recognize black / white stuff. It was also designed as a one-off movie because he only got funding for one movie. That's why Episode 4 (a tag added in a later edition) was the only one of the 6 which has a beginning and end, rather than a set up for the next movie. Only after it took off did the funding come in for the other 2. Episode 5 was in large part a set up for episode 6 since they knew they were doing it.

    There are plenty of mistakes caused by the prequels, they contradict some history written as a brief throwaway line in the original movies. Everything written for episode 4 set the boundaries for what would come after, from characters, outfits, ships, political / social settings etc. Episode 4 was written as a visual matin&#233;e for kids, with lots of effects, shooting, sword duels, saving the princes etc. It wasn't written with any forethought. The designs they could bring to the screen then was limited too in terms of costumes to get actors into, sets for them to act on as well as post production effects. The design process for everything was focused around the fact that it had to be practical to shoot and look good on film, without being too scary for the kids.

    In some cases the expanded universe does provide "extra explanations" on some mistakes in the movies, but they are just that, explanations you can use to fill the gap, it does not change the fact that something they put in the movie does not make sense. They are mistake patches, not removers.

    It does not help that George Lucas seems to have spent his entire career rehashing the SW franchise every couple of years and releasing yet another new remaster, so you can't just mention which episode 4 you mean but the exact edition. I gave up on this a long time ago, the sooner SW fans boycott new remasters the sooner Lucas will give up trying to milk them. I don't care if Han shot first, I don't care if Hayden Christiansen appeared at Vader's funeral pire as a ghost, the first remaster with everything cleaned up and digitized was fine, leave it alone from then on in.

    1. Re:It was designed for kids by bckrispi · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of mistakes caused by the prequels, they contradict some history written as a brief throwaway line in the original movies.

      Such as??

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    2. Re:It was designed for kids by AnalPerfume · · Score: 1

      Obi-Wan being unaware that Luke has a sister for a start.

    3. Re:It was designed for kids by AnalPerfume · · Score: 1

      /. needs an edit feature, sorry.

      The Star Wars saga was originally planned as 9 movies, but the plots for each movie were very vague, rough "back of a beermat" level of detail. He only managed to get funding for one of them, and knowing it was likely to be a one off didn't take any care in locking himself in. Luke & Leia were never meant to be related, let alone twins and Anakin Skywalker and Darth Vader were meant to be two different people. "Anakin was betrayed and murdered by Darth Vader, who was a pupil of mine before he turned to evil". In the fleshing out stage those details were added to help provide extra value to the cliffhanger in episode 5.

      After these are all set in stone in the original movies, he then has to find a place those could have come from, with all the story limitations he's created for himself. The tech from the prequels has to look modern from the audience's perspective, yet somehow evolve in the SW universe into the tech seen in the original movies. Sleek, aerodynamic ships evolve into blocky ones. For that he's done well. From a storytellers perspective it'd be far easier to work from episode 1 onwards, it keeps people guessing in the scenes. If you know Obi-Wan helps Luke 20yrs down the line, no matter what situation you put him in he survives, he has to, to help Luke years later.

      Remember Luke asking Leia if she remembers her real mother? Remember her reply? It does not tally with Leia's birth and Padme's death.

    4. Re:It was designed for kids by bckrispi · · Score: 1
      Yes, rough edges. But no contradiction that can't be resolved with a little bit of Star Wars apologetics! :) Obi Wan never "forgot" that Luke had a sister. He merely stated "That boy is our last hope". Leia had been raised to be the political resistance to the Empire, whereas Luke was raised to be martial (Jedi) resistance to it. If Luke were to fail, Leia would have to start her Jedi training from scratch (at a much older age than Luke was when he started), while also trying to balance her leadership of the Alliance.

      Remember Luke asking Leia if she remembers her real mother? Remember her reply? It does not tally with Leia's birth and Padme's death.

      Well, from a certain Point of View, it does. ;)

      LUKE Leia... do you remember your mother? Your real mother?

      LEIA Just a little bit. She died when I was very young.

      LUKE What do you remember?

      LEIA Just...images, really. Feelings.

      LUKE Tell me.

      LEIA She was very beautiful. Kind, but...sad.

      Nothing that Leia mentions here contradicts what happened at the end of RoTS. Recall that, like Luke, Leia is the child of the most powerful Jedi ever to live. Her attunement to the Force gives her faint recollections of the past (Through the Force, things you will see.. other places. The future, the horizon, old friends, long gone). In the brief time Padme was alive to see her children, she made that imprint on Leia.

      Now, before you accuse me of stretching ;) you must remember that Luke, as well had a memory of his mother, although he never connected it with her. Remember Padme's dying words:

      There is still good in him, Obi-wan...

      Do you find it a coincidence that Luke would tell Obi-wan those exact words twenty five years later? Obi-wan never expected that Vader could be saved after their first battle together. Obi-wan felt that the only way to set things right was for Luke to kill Vader. But had Luke done this, it would have been out of his fear and hatred, and the Emperor would simply take him as his new apprentice. It was Padme's "advice" to Luke that set him on a mission not to "Kill" Vader, but instead to "Save" Anakin.

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    5. Re:It was designed for kids by AnalPerfume · · Score: 1

      Start at a much older age? They're twins, Luke was still a newbie, at most he had a year or two's head start on learning this new Force stuff, with no teacher or training material, not counting the short sessions with Obi-Wan en route to the Death Star, or his few weeks on Dagobah with Yoda. He was hardly an an advanced student. Given how a Princess / Politician would be raised and trained to learn a lot of stuff in a structured way, you could easily argue that Leia would be in a better position to learn when she started training.

      "she died when I was very young" - yes, minutes old in fact. Before her eyes can adjust to the world outside the womb, before she realizes she's breathing this new stuff called air, she already has memories enough to recall 20yrs down the line.

      There are plot holes in most fiction regardless of the medium, Star Wars is no different. The holes were made worse by the prequels. The only way of filling them, is adding the mental fills often done by the fans. I do the same myself. I happen to be a fan of the Expanded Universe novels, the movies are handy for a visual reminder but not a lot else.

      The bottom line is the movies were never meant to be scrutinized in so much detail, they were entertainment for kids who wouldn't notice these plot holes. A lot of the criticism Star Wars gets, like the hatred for Jar Jar Binks comes from adults who watch a kids movie with adult eyes. It's not aimed at them. It's aimed at kids. They were the target age for the original trilogy and grew to love it then. All the new Star Wars stuff is just a long overdue continuation of something they loved from their childhood, a large part of that love comes from being the right target for a story, from the memories it evoked at the time, and the imagination it triggered. Revisit the prequels, the various Clone Wars episodes and try to watch them as a kid would, unjaded, with no adult-complex plots etc. Sit back and watch them for what they are, a visual piece of entertainment with plenty of action.

      For what it's worth, the authors in the Expanded Universe do a MUCH better job than George Lucas at bringing to life the Star Wars universe. They provide the depth, the complexity etc that tunes it more to an adult audience, while keeping the Star Wars "family friendly" approach to some subjects. Some authors are better than others, some books are better than others. Apart from a few bad novels, most are very good however.

    6. Re:It was designed for kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "she died when I was very young" - yes, minutes old in fact. Before her eyes can adjust to the world outside the womb, before she realizes she's breathing this new stuff called air, she already has memories enough to recall 20yrs down the line.

      She claims to remember "a little bit" – and then, when questioned further, admits that all she really remembers is "images": pictures of her. Beautiful, kind, and sad – all traits quite easily ascertained from pictures.

  92. Re:Obligatory Simpsons quote on this topic by cstacy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Doug: Uh question for Ms. Bellamy. In episode 2F09, when Itchy plays Scratchy's skeleton like a xylophone, he strikes the same rib twice in succession, yet he produces two clearly different tones. I mean, what are we to believe, that this is some sort of a... [the nerds chuckle] a magic xylophone or something? Boy, I really hope somebody got fired for that blunder.

    Wizard.

  93. Obvious Explanation by SourGrapes · · Score: 1

    Um...The Force?

  94. it's not all that bad by speedtux · · Score: 1

    Let's not even go near the idea of light beams being slow enough to dodge; that's just something you have let go of, or risk insanity.

    You can't see light beams. So, more likely, this is a non-linear interaction between a radiation source and air.

    But Luke's X-34 speeder on Tatooine? The Yugo of speeders, man. One hard stop, and out you go.

    They have artificial gravity, so they don't need seat belts.

    Add it all up and you have to wonder why stormtroopers don't just walk around naked, save for blinders and flip-flops.

    Because that would be scary.

    evolution here seems wacky, too

    Some of these creatures might be genetically engineered.

    So, large space worm lives in asteroid, disguises itself as a cave and waits for unwary spaceships to fly by so it can eat them?

    An organic space ship gone bad?

    Not every Sarlaac can count on an intergalactic mob boss to feed it tidbits.

    It may not always have been a desert.

    1. Re:it's not all that bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> But Luke's X-34 speeder on Tatooine? The Yugo of speeders, man. One hard stop, and out you go.

      > They have artificial gravity, so they don't need seat belts.

      Yet, Luke and Obi-Wan buckle up when the Falcon blasts out of Mos Eiseley!

  95. Suggested Reading by detarmstrong · · Score: 1

    This, in my opinion, is the best tone to use while writing about the design issues of the Star Wars universe:

    O N T H E I M P L A U S I B I L I T Y O F
    T H E D E A T H S T A R ' S
    T R A S H C O M P A C T O R .
    http://www.mcsweeneys.net/2002/01/10deathstar.html

  96. Intelligent Design vs. Evolution by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

    I don't think it's fair to say the Star Wars universe was intelligently designed; there's simply no proof of this. Yet there's plenty of evidence suggesting evolution. Just look at the Wookie for example. Who would design such a thing? Or whatever Jar Jar Binks is. Clearly, this is a product of evolution, not ID.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
  97. Stop that ship. Blast them by fuzznutz · · Score: 1

    2. Falcon takes off - Troopers shoot at AND HIT a vehicle moving at high speed away from them

    I seem to remember Han Solo standing on the loading ramp of the Falcon taking pot shots at the storm troopers while they shoot wildly around him. They do manage to hit the Falcon at take off and a few times ship to ship before he escapes. This is very similar to the scene where Leia and Chewbacca escapes from Cloud City in ESB.

    Face it. They couldn't hit the broad side of a barn.

  98. 2001 by bloobamator · · Score: 1

    My favorite sci-fi design flaws are in "2001: A Space Odyssey". Much love to the late Arthur C. Clarke, whose brilliance is immortalized, but damn! The one flaw that stands out the most is the external oxygen cable that connects the helmet to the EVO pack. One quick tug by HAL and poof! no more air for you.

    --
    "Crude and slow, clansman. Your attack was no better than that of a clumsy child."
  99. work rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't we really be discussing the work rules of the original death star? Didn't those guys have a union. They were really overworking them

  100. 6 million forms of communication by DaedylusSL · · Score: 1

    There's one thing about Star Wars that has bothered me since I was about 8. If C3-PO is supposed to be fluent in 6 million forms of communication, why is sign language not one of them? I assume there are deaf people in the Star Wars universe. I would assume that they have created their own sign language of some sort. Maybe 3PO can understand them, but he can't talk back to them. Seems like a pretty big flaw in a protocol droid that is supposed to be able to work as a translator.

    1. Re:6 million forms of communication by atomic-penguin · · Score: 1

      I would imagine the lack of mobility and dexterity in the original C-3PO suit/costume, would make sign language, English, Huttese, or otherwise quite difficult. C-3PO does use some hand motions and visual cues when telling the story to the Ewoks in their primitive language, but I wouldn't call it sign language.

      The actor could barely waddle in the heavy suit, and he couldn't walk up stairs. The ability to accurately and quickly form hand signals, necessary for sign language, was likely not possible with the C-3PO model of that time.

      --
      /^([Ss]ame [Bb]at (time, |channel.)){2}$/
    2. Re:6 million forms of communication by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I assume there are deaf people in the Star Wars universe.

      Perhaps they just implant robotic ears in the deaf people. They probably don't have a deaf culture movement over there.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  101. Wings in space by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 1

    My grandfather commented on the "wings" of ships that seemed to spend all their time in space.

    I think by "wings" you mean "s-foils" (they were called the latter in the films). It's pretty clear that the purpose of these were as weapon platforms (would you want some high-energy plasma mounted right beside the cockpit?).

    --
    Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
  102. Re:Your grade: C+ by node+3 · · Score: 1

    I was going to moderate your complaint down (offtopic, not flamebait or anything) but decided a response would be better in this case.

    Your post may have been ironic (a sig doesn't actually label any particular post), but I didn't find it funny or interesting in the least, and it was rather abrasive. I could almost tell it was meant to be funny.

    But, just like Lucas did with Jar Jar, sometimes you just miss. Surely he didn't intend for everyone to hate Jar Jar, in fact, you have to assume the opposite. He just got it wrong. Your initial post, according to the mods so far was a miss. Just accept your "-5 Jar Jar Binks" and move on.

  103. Oblig. Red Dwarf by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

    Lister:

    The Greeks have been camped outside of Troy, kapowin', zappin' and kersplattin' the Trojans for the best part of a decade, yeah? Then they wake up one mornin' and the Greeks have gone. And there outside the city walls they've left this gift, this tribute to their valiant foes, a huge wooden horse-- Just large enough to happily contain five hundred Greeks in full battle dress, and still have adequate room for toilet facilities!

    Are you telling me not one Trojan goes, 'Hang on a minute, that's a bit of a funny prezzie. What's wrong with a couple of hundred pairs of socks and some aftershave? No, they don't, they just wheel it in, and all decide to go for an early night.

    People that stupid deserve to be kapowed, zapped and kersplatted in their beds!

    And do you know what the funny thing is? From this particular phase in history derived the phrase - Beware of Greeks bearing gifts. When it'd be much more logical to derive the phrase - Beware of Trojans, they're complete SMEGHEADS!

  104. Re:Your grade: C+ by hey! · · Score: 1

    By all means then mod me offtopic. However I thought most people would realize that 100-16 is 84, not 79.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  105. The Force is strong in this one.... by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

    n/t

    --
    Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
  106. Let the viewers at home vote for their favorite... by Snufu · · Score: 0

    "...a huge exposed shaft in your Death Star throne room..."

    a) "What the Emperor does in his throne room is his own business."
    b) "Leave with poopy pants, he who does not expose shaft while using throne room." - Yoda.

  107. What's With All The Posts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's fiction. It's storytelling. It's art. It's entertaining.

    And somebody gets their panties in a bunch because it's not accurate science and plausible?

    And somebody else wants to argue about that?

    Oops! - Sorry. I forgot this was Slashdot . . .

  108. Honestly... by loster · · Score: 1

    I never really liked Star Wars.

  109. Re:Obligatory Simpsons quote on this topic by lawpoop · · Score: 1

    Doug: Uh question for Ms. Bellamy. In episode 2F09, when Itchy plays Scratchy's skeleton like a xylophone, he strikes the same rib twice in succession, yet he produces two clearly different tones. I mean, what are we to believe, that this is some sort of a... [the nerds chuckle] a magic xylophone or something? Boy, I really hope somebody got fired for that blunder.

    Wizard.

    Can someone clue me in here?

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
  110. Duh by Vexorian · · Score: 1

    The reason R2D2 and other artifacts do not speak is obviously to justify the purchase of C3PO and other protocol droids, considering that most planets actually speak English, so robots are really the only way to justify that purchase most of the times. This safe marketshare is the reason they didn't bother fixing C3PO's design flaws.

    --

    Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
  111. Not Science Fiction by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Those things could be problems if Star Wars was Science Fiction. But Star Wars never was. It's Fantasy, or perhaps Science Fantasy if such a genre were to be defined.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  112. Re:In space, only the keen eard can hear you screa by commodore64_love · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not only would it dissipate quickly, it wouldn't travel any further than the width of an atom. Take the moon mission as example, where the LEM traveled through the vacuum between the earth and the moon. Any sounds made by the men inside traveled to the surface of the vessel, and then stopped. There may have been one or two hydrogen atoms clinging to the skin that were "pushed off" by the sound's vibration, but that hardly qualifies as sound.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  113. Leigh Brackett by meowhous · · Score: 1

    That's because Leigh Brackett wrote the screenplay for ESB. Well, okay, that's open to debate; however, she did write one treatment, and I'd strongly suspect that her good space opera writing had an effect on Lucas and Kasdan.

  114. 38 States by Rupert · · Score: 1

    People will live where there are economic opportunities, and state lines, where there is a steep gradient in the price or availability of certain items or services due to different state laws, provide those opportunities.
    The boundaries of Minnesota are pretty much in the middle of nowhere, but moving them will not remove the incentives for liquor stores open on Sundays on the Wisconsin side and fireworks stalls on the South Dakota side (I believe the laws may have changed since I left, but the principle is the same).

    --

    --
    E_NOSIG
    1. Re:38 States by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      See, the problem with stupid laws like that is because the people in those districts don't agree with them, and that's why there's so much demand for things on the other side of the border. The laws continue to exist because the people in those districts don't really have control over their destiny, because they're tied up with people in other geographical areas, who have different values from them, and who have a big effect on their laws. The answer is to redraw the boundaries, so that people of like culture are grouped together, and can make their own decisions. While it may be lucrative for a few people to set up shops on borders, it would be better for the economy as a whole if people could govern themselves more effectively and have laws which reflect their own values, rather than the values of people in a neighboring district or city which happens to be part of the same political entity.

      As I pointed out in another message, boundaries are extremely important in politics. This is why gerrymandering is so popular with some politicians, and such a source of controversy. Don't like the way the people are voting? Move the boundaries around and you get different election results. If a certain group of people is voting for the opposite party, just move the boundaries so that voters of your party are joined to them and water down their vote, and suddenly they have less political power. Just imagine what would happen to politics in the USA if the USA merged with Mexico, and all the voters there got to vote in our elections. It'd be very different, to say the least, and many Americans wouldn't be happy about it.

      To address your example more specifically in my rambling post here, I don't know much about SD and WI, but I'm just guessing that fireworks are illegal in WI because of all the liberal urban voters in Milwaukee got them banned statewide. The rural voters probably aren't happy about it, but they don't have enough power to do anything about it since their votes are insignificant compared to all the urban voters in Milwaukee. The fireworks ban probably even makes sense in an urban center to prevent fires, but it doesn't make any sense at all in the open plains of the the country, far from any cities, where the rural dwellers live. SD, on the other hand, has no such ban because it's pretty much an entirely rural state, with no real cities to speak of, and has a much more conservative population that doesn't believe in banning things like guns and fireworks. I believe guns are similarly highly restricted in WI, even though large parts of the state are rural and those voters probably don't like those laws.

  115. Re:Obligatory Simpsons quote on this topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I happen to know the answer to that question. It was the MIDI-chlorians in the ribs that gave them the polyphonic capabilities.

  116. Re:In space, only the keen eard can hear you screa by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

    Gasses are quantized (made up of little particles), breaking down your "sound in space" theory.

    --
    "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  117. Re:Your grade: C+ by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    Well I understood you were making a joke about the innumeracy of liberal arts types. I thought it was funny.

    Ignore these peons.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  118. Evolution? What? by hyperion2010 · · Score: 1

    Yep, the last three make that stupid 10 worst products of evolution thing look even more stupid (I hardly though it possible!).

  119. You have to be more than a complete looser .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... to waste time looking for flaws in a sci-fi movie.

    Seriously, what kind of looser would spend time pushing the pause button on the remote to write a stupid article batching a movie with a made up plot.

  120. Lightsabers by PinkyDead · · Score: 1

    How do we know that they don't have hand guards?

    Sure we can't see them and nobody ever mentioned them - but that doesn't mean they aren't there. I have to say, I never saw anyone getting their fingers sliced off.

    Also, for blasters - again, how do we know that the shot that is seen isn't a tracer, and using the same invisible stuff that lightsaber hand guards are made of, the main shots travel between them. Also, thereby killing the poor stormtrooper with multiple hits.

    And as to the visibility from stormtrooper headgear - they were designed for clones, would they not have a precise form that wouldn't conform to Luke Skywalker's head. Maybe Boba Fett could put one on and he'd say "Wow! Great visibility, I can see everything with this."

    --
    Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
  121. Poor design? by Nomaxxx · · Score: 1

    Has he ever saw aliens of Star Trek?

  122. Time to spare by jandersen · · Score: 1

    So, here is a guy who has time on his hand - enough time, in fact, to go and point out that not only does he feel offended by the logical inaccuracies in Star Wars, but he can't stay away from the damned thing. A bit like the preachers who are secretly gay, but in public thunder against "that foul sin", perhaps?

    Was Star Wars ever intended to be a scientifically accurate portrayal? Of course not, it's entertainment; a glittery space opera. I can think of a million more glaring inaccuracies - for starters, how about the setting in a galaxy "far, far away, long, long ago", but they all look remarkably like your average Earth life-forms, somehow. It's just entertainment, have some fun.

  123. Goddam Japs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Seven Sumarai is an obvious rip off of the Magnificent Seven.

  124. Re:At the Risk of Sounding Like an Idiot by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    The red flags on your shoulders make you stick out like a sore thumb regardless of where you are.

    According to your own link: "Epaulettes were a detachable dress item worn only with tunic or greatcoat for parade or off duty wear".

    P.S. "Epaulettes" is what non-fucktards call those red flags on your shoulders.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  125. shallow trenches by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Also, the US Army requires a height of at least 58".

    As that's only 1.47 metres, I assume that's for women? Even then it's quite short.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:shallow trenches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's base 12. Either that or GP meant 5' 8".

    2. Re:shallow trenches by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      If he meant 5'8", then he's a dork. Or possibly a member of Spinal Tap.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:shallow trenches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  126. Re:In space, only the keen eard can hear you screa by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    They're quantized down here too. What was your point again?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  127. The author is trying too hard... by PLfag · · Score: 1


    1. R2D2 - he wasn't made to speak with humans but with other machines, why would you insert a voice chip in him, I don't know. I don't feel like talking with my toaster.
    2. C3PO - it's a protocol droid, he has to be humble and he's great at that. Having some "balls" wouldn't be a good feature.
    3. There are swords without handguards, and somehow people fought with them.
    4. Blasters - well kinda agree here, but yet again not much was said about them, so we can't really judge them. Like guess what would people 500years ago say about cars? "It's huge, heavy and made of metal, why would I want something like that...".
    5. Well some cars dont have seatbelts, neither do motorbikes. I think if you can build a lightsabre you can make something like a flying car in which you can actually sit in.
    6. Stormtroopers' uniforms - this is my favourit one. Their uniforms where white INTENTIONALLY, camouflage wasn't an option here because they were supposed to bring fear everywhere they went, the sole sight of them should make their enemies run for their lives.
    7. Deathstar - well if they had such strong defense, then why would they think someone could possibly hit that one tiny hole. And the second one was destroyed only because they weren't even halfway finished with it.
    8/9. I pretty much agree here
    10. Well midichlorians weren't that well described in the series, so we can't really tell whether injecting them is possible.

  128. 2 words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nerd Bating!

  129. Re:In space, only the keen eard can hear you screa by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

    There's no sound in space. A few stray molecules of hydrogen is NOT enough to propagate sound. I don't care if you're watching Mars collide with the Earth and go "boom", you're not going to hear anything from your shuttle orbiting the moon.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  130. How poor by edittard · · Score: 1

    How poor? Did they use slashcode?

    (I see taggings borked again)

    --
    At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
  131. The point of fiction is... by autoevolution · · Score: 1

    The point of fiction is that you can make up anything you want and people will like it if its entertaining. No one cares that the stuff isn't realistic, you don't see people arguing about poor design in ghostbusters. Also, star wars copied stuff from an older similar style movie which I forget the name of.

  132. Re:In space, only the keen eard can hear you screa by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

    They are dense enough down here that it's a statistical probability that they will bounce off each other. On the otherhand in space, there are so few that chances are they will never even come close to hitting, let alone do it enough to propogate sound waves.

    Think of it like a ball pit, if you jump into a ball pit it makes a wave which propogates. Now go outside and jump up and down. Surely somewhere there are balls outside of a ballpit so by your logic you should be making ballpit waves that are just really hard to hear, which is, clearly bogus.

    (disclaimer, I understand soundwave propogation is more complicated than a ballpit, it's called a metaphor...)

    --
    "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  133. Re:In space, only the keen eard can hear you screa by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    So at sea level there's sound, at ten thousand feet there's sound, in space there's no sound. At what altitude does it suddenly cut off then, Einstein? 50 thousand feet? 15,027 metres and 23.20126 cm?

    The argument about discrete atoms is a pile of crap. Even at atmospheric pressure a gas is composed of much more empty space than atoms.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  134. Re:In space, only the keen eard can hear you screa by mfnickster · · Score: 1

    So at sea level there's sound, at ten thousand feet there's sound, in space there's no sound. At what altitude does it suddenly cut off then, Einstein? 50 thousand feet? 15,027 metres and 23.20126 cm?

    A. N. Volobuev and A. P. Tolstonogov published a paper in the Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics in 2003 in which they calculate the minimum atmospheric pressure necessary to propagate sound. They wrote that on Earth the pressure drops below this threshold at about 95km above sea level.

    Distinctive Features of the Propagation of Sound Waves in a Perfect Gas at Low Pressure

    --
    "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
  135. Dear "anonymous coward" by stepinto · · Score: 1
    "Point five past light" is not so open to interpretation as you might think. Given, we don't know the units: it is certainly possible that he means "0.5 [million parsecs per hour] past light", though this is extremely unlikely.

    A logarithmic scale seems like a good idea, but NO distribution would be so skewed that a very fast ship would have a score of +0.5 from the base (light.) This would mean we are constantly measuring speeds in numbers like 0.3932831. A civilization with technology like this would surely know how to normalize a numeric distribution.

    If I am not correct on the assumption of extremely small galaxy size (and modified physics to allow for such small interstellar distances without galactic collapse), then it follows necessarily that an even more irrational system - the implied speed scale - is present.

  136. Darths & Droids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not sure if anyone's pointed out the Darths & Droids webcomic yet, seems extremely relevant.

    http://www.darthsanddroids.net/

  137. easy to say 32 years later... by skander · · Score: 1

    While admittably, the technology of Star Wars wasn't terribly well conceived, this whole thing must be looked at retroactively.

    When Jules Verne first wrote of a trip to the moon around 1880, he wrote of a large cannon, shooting a cannonball that would contain a passenger. Rockets hadn't been invented yet. Doesn't mean that Jules Verne was an idiot. One way or the other, we did land a man on the moon, and to be fair, it did take a whole lot of firepower.

    It's laughable to consider Sci-Fi "wrong!". It's FICTION! Of course it's wrong...The fact is that a long of sci-fi writers imagine things long into the future, and come up with impossible ideas. Sometimes, those ideas become possible by research, and that's a great achievement, both for the author and the scientist.

    Don't look for anything more... Unless you're reading Nostradamus, of course...

  138. R2D2 Can't Talk for a Reason by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

    I wrote a short story years ago in high school on that very topic.

    Here is a quote from a character Lenos Vicar explaining why astromech droid don't get voice modules.

    "Voice module? Bah first off each division's astromechs have their own "Blip" codes to prevent audables being picked up on atmospheric ops. (My assumption is in a future that technologically advanced listening device should be pretty damn good) But the key reason is bonding... Last thing we want is our pilots getting attached to the little shits. Their disposable. I can't count the number of Empire high court bueracrats that get attached to their bulter droids. Last thing I need is some cry-baby getting all wet over his co-pilot getting shot."

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
    1. Re:R2D2 Can't Talk for a Reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wrote a short story years ago in high school on that very topic.
      ...
      Last thing we want is our pilots getting attached to the little shits. Their disposable.
      I can't count the number of Empire high court bueracrats that get attached to their bulter droids.

      I hope that since high school you have learned the difference between "their/there/they're" and how to look up "bureaucrat" and "butler" in a dictionary.