Slashdot Mirror


Police Called Over 11-Year-Old's Science Project

garg0yle writes "Police in San Diego were called to investigate an 11-year-old's science project, consisting of 'a motion detector made out of an empty Gatorade bottle and some electronics,' after the vice-principal came to the conclusion that it was a bomb. Charges aren't being laid against the youth, but it's being recommended that he and his family 'get counseling.' Apparently, the student violated school policies — I'm assuming these are policies against having any kind of independent thought?"

687 comments

  1. I recommend ... by Colin+Smith · · Score: 5, Funny

    That everyone should stick some coloured wires into cardboard tubes, then leave them lying about all over the place. The more the merrier.

     

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:I recommend ... by negRo_slim · · Score: 4, Informative

      It really comes down to how inept the school officials have shown themselves to be. I'm an optimistic person but stories like this make me worry.

      Just take a look at United Nuclear or this book to see some serious science fair projects, and imagine how some of those would of went down for the poor kid!

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    2. Re:I recommend ... by increment1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It isn't necessarily ineptitude that causes school officials to make decisions like this. The basic reasoning boils down to the fact that the school officials will take little if any flack for over reacting in the name of safety, but they will lose their jobs and be raked through the mud if they fail to react to an "obvious" threat.

      Part of the problem is that no one ever gets rewarded for the issues they chose to ignore. So there is no benefit to the principal to ignore what they think is a possible threat even if the probability of it being a threat is vanishingly small.

      The end result is that school officials with a high self interest will put their self interest in front of everyone else (the authorities who are wasting their time, the students out of class, the student directly involved, the parents who have to come pick up all the students early, etc), since they are more worried about the ramifications to themselves than the trouble they may cause for others.

    3. Re:I recommend ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...would have went down for...

      Are you a school official?

    4. Re:I recommend ... by cool_arrow · · Score: 5, Insightful

      it is stupidity. An intelligent principal could have ascertained the necessary information by sitting down with the student and asking questions calmly thereby by avoiding all the resulting mess.

    5. Re:I recommend ... by Narpak · · Score: 4, Funny

      The end result is that school officials with a high self interest will put their self interest in front of everyone else (the authorities who are wasting their time, the students out of class, the student directly involved, the parents who have to come pick up all the students early, etc), since they are more worried about the ramifications to themselves than the trouble they may cause for others.

      That's why I have always been in favour of school consisting of a transport vehicle going around picking up each kid individually and placing each into their own stasispod. Then said stasispod is driven to a building were they will be stacked up for 10 hours and all interaction will be committed virtually with the kids never leaving their respective pods. If any student violates policy or acts in a threatening manner the pod can be disconnected from the hub and driven directly to the nearest correctional facility. Safety first!

    6. Re:I recommend ... by increment1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I agree, there is seemingly a large amount of stupidity involved in the situation.

      The principal not only could have, but SHOULD have interviewed the student to ascertain the risk. However, say the principal is sitting there with the student with a device with wires sticking out of it all over the place. The principal doesn't know enough about electronics to to be sure whether it is a safe device, or is indeed a bomb. Additionally, the principal doesn't trust the student since if it is a bomb the student probably wouldn't admit to it.

      So, given this situation, the principal, as a self optimizing and very self interested individual, decides that there is no advantage or reason for them to take the risk of trusting the student. They error way over on the side of caution since there is no compelling reason for them not to.

      Until there are actual ramifications for raising a false alarm, issues like this are not only likely to continue, but inevitable. If the school or principal was billed for the cost of a false alarm (or just a token percentage of it) then I would be will to bet that you would see the cases of false alarms drop dramatically.

    7. Re:I recommend ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The one who needs "counseling" here is the vice-principal. Or maybe an actual education?

      Another sign we've entered a Dark Age .... they just don't usually get labeled as such til later.

    8. Re:I recommend ... by jamesh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When I was about 15 (20 years ago), we used to make little (~1m x 1m x 1m) hot air balloons out of tissue paper and use methylated spirits as the fuel. On one occasion our bottle of fuel was leaking - the lid had cracked or something and didn't fit tightly - so we chucked a cloth under the lid to stop it spilling. We were just about to head out the door when my dad pointed out that the fuel bottle (which I was carrying in my hand) looked uncannily like a molotov cocktail, and that we might want to reconsider how we carried it. Back then, had someone noticed, we might have been confronted by a policeman wanting to make sure we weren't up to too much mischief... I wouldn't like to think about what would have happened if we tried the same sort of thing today.

      It must suck a bit to be a kid in these times. There's no way I'm going to take my kids on an airplane... not because I fear for their safety, but because I just know that one of them will think it hilarious to make a joke about a bomb, and nobody else is going to find it funny.

    9. Re:I recommend ... by damburger · · Score: 1

      School officials? Who do you mean?

      Teachers? Headteachers? Board members? PTA?

      The education system is an easy target. Its a small voting block which soaks up the blame for bad parenting and broken communities. The likelihood here is that the school in question was micromanaged to fuck, to the point the staff were not permitted independent thought, never mind the students.

      These days, the thinking in government is to bring damn markets into everything. Markets mean a price system and the artificial 'prices' are arbitrary government metrics such as test scores, which of course fall foul of Goodhart's law. The idea behind this peculiar form of market fundamentalism is presumably to give schools the kind of secure, nurturing and creatively stimulating environment found in most corporate offices.

      In short, don't automatically go after the school or its 'officials' - in all likelihood the environment it is set up in makes it impossible to act rationally as an institution.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    10. Re:I recommend ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And he would get completely honest and forthcoming answers from each of his hundreds of students, half of whom are still mad about homework, detention, bad grades, and general rebelliousness. I think not. If the principle doesn't have a good pre-existing relationship with the child, then he cannot trust the child's testimony. What he COULD do is admit that it was a FALSE alarm, apologize to the child and his family over the trouble, and emphasize the importance of discussing science projects and their make-up BEFORE bringing them to school.

    11. Re:I recommend ... by damburger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think you can frame this as game theory; the staff of the school are not reacting in this way in order to maximize their personal benefit (or minimize their personal loss). Whilst I concede that some people do think in this way, teaching selects out that characteristic by being an underpaid and overworked profession for the level of education and aptitude they have.

      The problem is that the staff are not permitted to make any kind of decision themselves; they are completely servile to the institution and the institution cannot be expected to exhibit human rationality.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    12. Re:I recommend ... by hanabal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      then the students family would be sued to cover the cost of the false alarm, cause it was the students fault in the first place

    13. Re:I recommend ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      School administrators are often failed teachers or P.E. instructors with a career in the classroom that can be measured in 5 years or less. They are truly inept and feel that a tasted of the education system of any kind makes them qualified to then lead entire schools in turn.

      The man in this story is simply a moron who did not rationally discuss anything about the construction of the device with the child to draw intelligent conclusions. He had a knee-jerk reaction because that's what stupid people do when presented with things they don't - or refuse to - understand.

      Sadly this is absolutely the norm in school districts all across America, and has been for a few decades. The education system isn't flawed, just that the standards for these types of positions are _incredibly_ low.

    14. Re:I recommend ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but they will lose their jobs and be raked through the mud if they fail to react to an "obvious" threat.

      Yes, gotta love those exploding empty bottles with wires on them.
      OH GOD, I MIGHT GET LIKE, AIR, IN MY EYES, OR SOMETHING...

      Even if it was a bomb, they STILL wouldn't have had anything happen to them. You can make bombs out of anything nearly.

      This is just idiots overreacting like usual.

      Charges aren't being laid against the youth, but it's being recommended that he and his family 'get counseling.'

      This part in particular makes me want to torture the people who suggested that for the rest of their natural life. I despise humans who act like this.

    15. Re:I recommend ... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      "It isn't necessarily ineptitude"

      "boils down to the fact that the school officials will take little if any flack for over reacting in the name of safety, but they will lose their jobs and be raked through the mud if they fail to react to an "obvious" threat."

      So - how do you define "ineptitude"? These are educators. These are people who interact with the kid, daily. These are the people who gave the kid an assignment. Presumably, they can ASK the kid what his project is meant to do. Presumably they can understand the basic concept when he explains it.

      Inept asses who should never have graduated college, let alone become educators. Parents should consider pulling their kids out of that school, as the educators obviously have no common sense, poor judgement, and are unlikely to teach the kids anything worth knowing.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    16. Re:I recommend ... by dynamo · · Score: 1

      I know you meant that as a joke, but you are absolutely right.

      Is it really a good idea to have the stupidest people running the schools?

    17. Re:I recommend ... by DJRumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This article didn't make sense. It says the student broken no laws, but he was in violatino of school policy? What kind of policy prevents them from bringing in harmless science projects?

      "The student will not be prosecuted, but authorities were recommending that he and his parents get counseling, the spokesman said. The student violated school policies, but there was no criminal intent, Luque said."

      Why the hell would they recommend counseling for a non-violent and non-criminal act?

      Is there a better link regarding this article?

    18. Re:I recommend ... by coolgeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The school's statement makes no sense either. The school's policies are published here I don't see where he ran afoul of them.

      --

      cat /dev/null >sig
    19. Re:I recommend ... by xtracto · · Score: 4, Informative

      I am sorry to tell you this guys but, you (USA) have lost the war against terrorism.

      The Terrorists have won and brought your society to their knees.

      Sorry.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    20. Re:I recommend ... by smokin_juan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "The principal doesn't know enough about electronics..." How could he not know? He's overseeing a *technical* school. Does he ever venture out into the halls or talk to the kids? He's a fucking absentee landlord and deserves to lose his job two weeks ago. And shame on the parents for letting the gestapo inspect their house and suggest counseling after "da bomb" was determined to be harmless.

    21. Re:I recommend ... by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      However, say the principal is sitting there with the student with a device with wires sticking out of it all over the place. The principal doesn't know enough about electronics to to be sure whether it is a safe device, or is indeed a bomb. Additionally, the principal doesn't trust the student since if it is a bomb the student probably wouldn't admit to it.

      Someone who personally knows the student and could accurately assess the situation should have been there. The principle, and assistant principle or just a teacher. Was there no-one around who actually knew the kid ? Seems like a pretty bad school to me.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    22. Re:I recommend ... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It takes a few seconds to call the police, but well over 10 minutes to talk to the student. Time is money!

    23. Re:I recommend ... by deniable · · Score: 1

      Have you noticed they've changed tactics. Get some low-level idiot caught every so often and let the TSA do the heavy lifting. Shoe checks, liquid restrictions... Next step, peanut based explosives.

    24. Re:I recommend ... by Sulphur · · Score: 1, Informative

      Those who can do,
      those who can't teach,
      and those who can't teach administrate.

      --

      Don't get me started.

    25. Re:I recommend ... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      It really comes down to how inept the school officials have shown themselves to be.

      Exactly. If your child goes to that school, demand the immediate firing of the vice-principal. I'm damn sure I wouldn't want in incompetent clown like that anywhere *near* my children.

    26. Re:I recommend ... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In most cases, "Don't make Admin look stupid, especially if they are." is implied policy #0.

      This is in no way confined to schools, of course.

    27. Re:I recommend ... by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Until there are actual ramifications for raising a false alarm, issues like this are not only likely to continue, but inevitable.

      If we try to solve this solution by punishing false alarms, it will make the problem worse as anyone with half a brain realizes that they will be punished no matter what happens. Would you want to stay in the kind of position where no matter what you do, you are penalized? If I have that kind of boss, I leave immediately. The only people who remain will be those who are too inept to find an alternative.

      The solution is going to be that eventually kids will get used to the idea that they shouldn't bring things in that scare their administrators, and they'll adapt. May sound lame, but it's what's going to happen, unless we can somehow reduce the risk that people are going to come and shoot their classmates, or bring a bomb. No school administrator wants that to happen at their school. You may rightly say that the risk of that happening in a particular school is unlikely, and you would be right, but no administrator knows how to determine if it is likely to happen at their school or not. They may have students a lot like Dylan Klebold in their school, and don't know how to ensure that they don't go off the deep end, so they do the best they can.

      --
      Qxe4
    28. Re:I recommend ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it ran on lithium batteries, which are obviously capable of exploding...

    29. Re:I recommend ... by selven · · Score: 2, Funny

      DRIVING the stasispods around? You CHILD MURDERER. Driving kills 40000 people a year, we can't let CHILDREN be driven around in trucks! Everyone (including the adults, they should be protected from themselves as well and also their bodies are strong enough to assault, molest or kill a child so they should be restrained) should be legally required to remain in a stasispod 24/7 at home with all interactions virtual while trustworthy law enforcement officers can walk around outside and protect us.

      That's safety.

    30. Re:I recommend ... by interkin3tic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The school's statement does make sense, I'm sure it was to calm parents.

      "Don't worry, we have rules and guidelines, and a system in place that would have caught this had it been real. We're like all over that. He broke the rules, had it been a real thing we would have stopped him before he did anything"

      It's lies obviously, since the kid did nothing wrong, but that's what the purpose of that was, to cover their own asses and make sure at the next PTA they don't get "They're NOT THINKING OF THE CHILDREN! This could have been a terrorist attack! This shouldn't happen!"

    31. Re:I recommend ... by StarsAreAlsoFire · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Why the hell would they recommend counseling for a non-violent and non-criminal act?"

      Being mind-raped by the State causes mental trauma.

      Oh. Wait. That couldn't be it.

    32. Re:I recommend ... by kandela · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe it was this bit, "The Millennial Tech experience will enhance educational opportunities, prepare students for the workplace and allow all individuals to feel comfortable and secure." Clearly he should have anticipated the paranoia of his vice principal and refrained from making anything he could mistake for something else and thus feel unsafe. *shakes head*

      --
      Conservation of angular momentum makes the world go round.
    33. Re:I recommend ... by gnapster · · Score: 1

      These are the people who gave the kid an assignment.

      TFA describes this as a 'personal science project', which sounds unassigned. If that was the case, then it might have seemed that much more suspicious.

    34. Re:I recommend ... by kramulous · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I live in an Australia city now, but when my kids get to the inquisitive age, I'll have to pack up and move back to the bush - I like north queensland ... barrier reef.

      We used to combine all sorts of nasty chemicals together as kids to see what would give a good bang. After many experiments we worked out which ones generally reacted together. Dad made sure there were textbooks lying around so we could work out what the reactions were and why (we were left to do this on our own - not forced to do so). We also built lots of electronics and mechanical contraptions from supplies we found and collected from the farm dumps. All kinds of shit really; No such thing as boredom.

      I now have three science degrees; Mathematics, Computer and Organic Chemistry. Brother is an orthopaedic surgeon.

      There is no way we could do that in the current environment where we live now. Too many nannies would get their panties in a twist. I do feel sorry for kids today. Kids will be kids.

      --
      .
    35. Re:I recommend ... by Imrik · · Score: 4, Funny

      The Terrorists have won and brought your society to their knees.

      Did not! We managed that all on our own thank you very much.

    36. Re:I recommend ... by FatherDale · · Score: 1

      Makes sense to me. It can't be the principal's fault that he's a moron, so the family should get counseling.

    37. Re:I recommend ... by StarsAreAlsoFire · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "The solution is going to be that eventually kids will get used to the idea that they shouldn't bring things in that scare their administrators"
      *twitch*

      " unless we can somehow reduce the risk that people are going to come and shoot their classmates,"

      To negative numbers? The chances of a kid dying in a violent crime involving explosives at a school are so low that you need a scientific calculator to display them. Compare that to the mortality rate in high-school football: http://www.scienceagogo.com/news/19980610033631data_trunc_sys.shtml

      The problem won't be solved until idiots that fail to understand basic statistics aren't allowed to graduate high school. Though jailing any idiot that ever excuses incidents like this with any permutation of the phrase "they['re] do[ing] the best they can".

      There's a quote which I fear I cannot find in order to cite, but to paraphrase:
      "If all the well-intentioned were killed at birth, the remaining evil-doers would be small potatoes by comparison."

    38. Re:I recommend ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More evidence for the ineptness of USian schools: "would of went down"

    39. Re:I recommend ... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Your reaction is almost (but not quite) as stupid as that of the teacher. How big of a fool do you have to be in order to make generalizations about an entire society on the basis of a single fact-free article which speaks about an overreaction on the part of a few individuals?

      I might also mention that, here in Canada, my school was evacuated about 13 years ago .... because a teacher looked in a locker and saw a cardboard box filled with electronics and plasticine. I guess the terrorists won back then, and in a different country too!

      Stop being such a melodramatic jackass, and use your head for a change. People have been having stupid over-reactions since long before the first hominid discovered how to throw a rock. Your own response to this article is a perfect example of man's tendency to make foolish judgments based on insufficient data.

    40. Re:I recommend ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess what you are saying is that this all smacks of way too much freedom, scientific curiosity, oh well, let's just say it, of that "fancy book-learnin" for your little head?

    41. Re:I recommend ... by markfinn · · Score: 5, Informative

      Those who can do,
      those who can't teach,

      From every good teacher you ever had:

      Fuck You.

    42. Re:I recommend ... by freedomlinux · · Score: 1

      He certainly has violated their policy! Read a little closer and you will see that fabrication is prohibited. It was obviously a violation of Academic Honesty to fabricate that motion-detector.

      [/sarcasm]
      [reality]

    43. Re:I recommend ... by spokedoke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is one of those real life incidents that makes movies with an idiot plot all the more believable.

    44. Re:I recommend ... by guardian-ct · · Score: 1

      It's the usual clauses... "Socially Responsible Behavior includes, but is not limited to:" also known as, we can decide you broke a policy whether or not it's actually written. A great many school behavior policies include similar language, allowing school authorities to add things not previously written.

      He didn't break any laws, but most policies are much less specific than law. He's just lucky they didn't include "these policies may change at any time, with or without notice".

    45. Re:I recommend ... by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

      Why the hell would they recommend counseling for a non-violent and non-criminal act?

      They probably need counseling after being abused and strip searched by an overreacting school and police dept!

      I wonder what wasn't said in the article. If the kid was uncooperative or suspicious (perhaps he was overheard calling it a bomb), then I can see this kind of reaction. If the kid was just tinkering and liked electronics, he probably would have loved to explain it.

    46. Re:I recommend ... by sharkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It sounds like a Simpson's chalkboard gag: "I will not expose the ignorance of the faculty"

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    47. Re:I recommend ... by omb · · Score: 1

      And, since they have NO evidence of ANYTHING, they will loose.

    48. Re:I recommend ... by tom17 · · Score: 1

      Oh man, I had that 2nd book as a kid (albeit with a different cover). Studied it cover to cover many times, alas we didn't have the resources to build anything from it :(

    49. Re:I recommend ... by Duradin · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Those who can't do, teach. Those that can't teach, coach. Those that can't coach become administrators.

    50. Re:I recommend ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They need counseling to deal with the harassement and mental anguish.

    51. Re:I recommend ... by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe some instruction would be in order.
      Rule one. Don't scare the sheep.
      Rule two. Don't scare the sheep that thinks they are in charge.

      I think that making this guy look like a fool might be a good thing. I would have been all with letting him keep his dignity up till the CYA part at the end.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    52. Re:I recommend ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This would be almost sufficient for physical security. Now to talk about virtual security. Just think of those children, all interacting virtually with a potentially PAEDOPHILE school assistant and particularly with the other students who might show sexually charged interaction patterns of the third order WITH YOUR KID INVOLVED!! The only possible solution is to cut all interactions with the help of the trusty old KGB sensory deprivation tanks. The GWB originated Enhanced Interrogation Methods/No Child Left Behind programme has the necessary budgets already in place for the acquisition of the tanks and the stimulus package of the current government has already increased the budget for the good of the nation, proving that they too are thinking of the children, BUT NOT THAT WAY!!

      I felt already more safe by simply articulating this.

    53. Re:I recommend ... by genner · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In most cases, "Don't make Admin look stupid, especially if they are." is implied policy #0. .

      Of course, schools are designed to teach kids how the real world works.

    54. Re:I recommend ... by iPhr0stByt3 · · Score: 1
    55. Re:I recommend ... by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Vice principal counseling should be revoking their license or whatever they need to teach, ripping up their diplomas, and sending them back to school, starting at about grade 5... with math and science compulsory. Oh, and a slap upside the head every second hour to keep their brains from jamming again. This is about as stupid as the born again Christian I met in Saint Louis who was a genetic engineer at Monsanto who didn't believe in evolution. Just when you think you've met an ultimate retard...

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    56. Re:I recommend ... by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think you can frame this as game theory; the staff of the school are not reacting in this way in order to maximize their personal benefit (or minimize their personal loss). Whilst I concede that some people do think in this way, teaching selects out that characteristic by being an underpaid and overworked profession for the level of education and aptitude they have.

      Teaching may select out that characteristic, but management seems to select for that characteristic. The person in question was Vice Principal. If the theory holds true that bad engineers in companies are promoted to management to avoid causing actual damage, you can easily imagine what happens in schools. (And yes, like most stereotypes, even if it were generally true, it's almost certainly not absolutely true. But, what sort of person would spend years to get a degree to teach, just to take the position of Vice Principal and be stuck primarily discipling children? And if they're not a teacher at all, why, as a manager, would they want to work in a school?)

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    57. Re:I recommend ... by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "a teacher looked in a locker and saw a cardboard box filled with electronics and plasticine. I guess the terrorists won back then"

      You can bet it. Plasticine is plasticine and electronics in a box are electronics in a box. Having the school evacuated was overreaction due to the "terror of terrorism".

      The fact you don't even notice this is further proof of their victory.

    58. Re:I recommend ... by komode0 · · Score: 1

      Some people get into education because they get more than 3 months vacation every year.

    59. Re:I recommend ... by Schadrach · · Score: 1

      So what you are saying is that if administrator's are punished over false negatives (which they are, this is not reacting to a genuine threat) but also get punished over false positives that they'll simply get out because they might have to, you know, look into the situation before making any drastic reactions?

    60. Re:I recommend ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The way I read it, the counseling is for the trauma caused by the inept school officials / police raid of the house....

    61. Re:I recommend ... by jamesh · · Score: 1

      I live in an Australia city now

      Me too, but a rural city and probably far enough away that not too many people would notice. Unfortunately there is a very real risk of things catching fire at the moment which rather limits the mischief you can get up to without risking a whole lot of deaths.

      I do feel sorry for kids today. Kids will be kids.

      It's a tricky one. Lots of people say "we did such and such when we were kids and we survived", but that's a pretty steep selection bias. Many many kids have been killed by "combining all sorts of nasty chemicals together" etc, but they aren't around to tell you about it.

      We're going to have to accept that if you are going to give kids the freedom to reach their full potential, some of them are going to be killed or seriously injured along the way. The problem for me is every time a kid blows themselves up or falls under a plough because they were riding on the back of a tractor it makes the news, thus increasing my anxiety as a parent and making me realise just how easy my kids can come to harm... it's scary.

      The other thing is that if the powers that be try and make the world safer for kids, they are going to have to decide what an acceptable number of yearly deaths is (statistically of course) and set the rules appropriately. And what politician is going to say anything other than that zero is the only acceptable number?

    62. Re:I recommend ... by Neost · · Score: 1

      it's all so the school administrators can break their arms patting themselves and each other on the back at how they handled this desperate situation and saved all those innocent children.....posturing, more posturing and further posturing....

    63. Re:I recommend ... by c6gunner · · Score: 1, Troll

      heh. "victory", huh? I don't think that word means what you think it means.

      I'm sure Osama Bin laden is sitting in a cave right now yelling:

        "OMG guys, did j00 see this? A teacher in Amerikkka called da cops on sum kid! Allahu Akbar, victory is ours! Our Jihad is over!"

      Of course, this event will shortly be followed by President Obama handing over the keys to the Whitehouse, and the entire US population converting to Islam. Truly a great day for the Caliphate.

    64. Re:I recommend ... by haruharaharu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Counseling from the trauma of having the bomb squad called over your science project?

      --
      Reboot macht Frei.
    65. Re:I recommend ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      That everyone should stick some coloured wires into cardboard tubes, then leave them lying about all over the place. The more the merrier.

      That's not a bad idea. Maybe it will desensitize us to such stupidity.

      charges aren't being laid against the youth,

      Well, good, but that shouldn't excuse a brainless bureaucrat from some consequences for the damage he's caused. How do you think that student is feeling right about now? That assistant principal took a promising future engineer or scientist and probably turned him into a lawyer. That happened to one of my uncles: he got similarly screwed early in his life, and became an attorney because "that is never, ever, going to happen to me again." Pointlessly fucking people over is, in fact, a great way to manufacture terrorists. I wouldn't be surprised if someone who was treated this badly came back at some point with a real IED.

      but it's being recommended that he and his family 'get counseling.

      Well, if they didn't need counseling before, I'm sure they could use some now. Incredible. When I was that age, I put together plenty of school projects that, by the standards of this institution, would have had me arrested on the spot (think electrolysis setup with a bank of a half-dozen Eveready IGNITOR dry cells and six-inch carbon rods as just one example.) At a minimum, that student and his family are owed an abject, and very public apology (and if they have any sense, will immediately move their son to another school.)

      Truly makes one wish to throw up. If the administration of our schools is this ignorant, I'm not surprised that they're unable to maintain reasonable standards of education.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    66. Re:I recommend ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, we would test the stupidity of the average vice principal

    67. Re:I recommend ... by KreAture · · Score: 1

      Ofcource the student would admit it if it was a bomb. That's what terrorists do... They yell something including the word infidel and then they go boom.

    68. Re:I recommend ... by JohnVanVliet · · Score: 1

      what do you know I have a hard back copy of the book "build your own ..." ( my copy is about 10 years old by now and in a box someplace) it is cool .I was thinking of using the ultra hi frequency device as a car alarm 20,000 cycles at 130 to 160 db . That would serve the thief right

      --
      "I don't pitch OpenSUSE Linux to my friends, i let Microsoft do it for me
    69. Re:I recommend ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >the institution cannot be expected to exhibit human rationality.:

      there is no such measurable entity as "The Institution". There are only people looking for excuses to not take responsibility.

    70. Re:I recommend ... by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      Why the hell would they recommend counseling for a non-violent and non-criminal act?

      Is there a better link regarding this article?

      I can only assume it would be to deal with the trauma caused by school officials, police, firemen bomb squad personnel?

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    71. Re:I recommend ... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Those who can't administrate, play music. Those who can't play music, play rock and roll. Those who can't play rock and roll, play rock and roll anyways.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    72. Re:I recommend ... by palegray.net · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Okay, so what policies did the student violate?

    73. Re:I recommend ... by BlogTroller · · Score: 1
      This is a joke...
      • INTERNET/NETWORK COMPUTER USE
      • -Not change default or desktop settings

      They don't have a serious security policy/system on their computers?

      • SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE BEHAVIOR
      • -Prolonged or heavy kissing
      • -Excessive body contact (including sitting on the lap of another student)

      Wat? Are they religious, thought this was a science oriented school? Btw. they didn't say anything about bullying. Bringing electronics, home made stuff or potentially dangerous things to school is not mentioned.

    74. Re:I recommend ... by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

      Why the hell would they recommend counseling for a non-violent and non-criminal act?

      I think the family might need counceling for the trauma caused by the school. Imagine how paranoid that kid (and his parents) are going to be from now on.

    75. Re:I recommend ... by Stargoat · · Score: 1

      Makes me want to move to a gulch somewhere.

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    76. Re:I recommend ... by jabbathewocket · · Score: 1

      Ineptitude is "he and his family should get counciling because his motion detector LOOKED like a bomb to someone else" not that the principle mistakenly thought it was a bomb.. mistakes happen.. but how you deal with them is what makes you inept.

    77. Re:I recommend ... by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 1, Funny

      Either they loose it or tighten it. What other option do they have?

    78. Re:I recommend ... by quanticle · · Score: 1

      The solution is going to be that eventually kids will get used to the idea that they shouldn't bring things in that scare their administrators, and they'll adapt.

      Is that really the sort of adaptation you want? Training people to follow orders and never challenge authority lays the groundwork for tyranny.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    79. Re:I recommend ... by quanticle · · Score: 1

      Teaching may select out that characteristic, but management seems to select for that characteristic.

      Really? In my experience, it seems that management selects even more strongly against that trait than teaching. I mean, if managers could rationally analyze their reward matrices, then a lot of corporate fuck ups could have been avoided.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    80. Re:I recommend ... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I don't know if that's the sort of adaptation I prefer, but it is definitely what will happen, because it's the easiest thing to do for everyone involved. Also, people who knee-jerk to challenging authority and have no capability to follow orders are generally incompetent. There has to be balance.

      --
      Qxe4
    81. Re:I recommend ... by quanticle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The terrorists do not have to win in order for us to lose.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    82. Re:I recommend ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's more true than most would want to admit, and it's real life support for the old maxim:
      "If you can't do, teach. If you can't teach, get into management. If you can't manage, run for president"

    83. Re:I recommend ... by jhol13 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      they shouldn't bring things in that scare their administrators

      As a Finn I hope this happens. You know, stifling imagination and inventiveness is a sure way to ensure competitiveness will drop too.

      Anything can, and will, scare other people. Teddy bears to geocaching to advertisements to ...

    84. Re:I recommend ... by Alexandra+Erenhart · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nope. Those who can't play rock and roll become pop artists :P

    85. Re:I recommend ... by Sulphur · · Score: 0, Troll

      You missed the third line.

      Whoosh.

    86. Re:I recommend ... by quanticle · · Score: 1

      So, you see no value in trying to prevent a situation where people are trained to do nothing that makes the authority uncomfortable? Even when said authority is violating the rights of others?

      I'll accept the proportion of people who are jerks and never accept any authority in exchange for the majority of the population having the ability to become outraged when genuine violations of rights occur.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    87. Re:I recommend ... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      So, you see no value in trying to prevent a situation where people are trained to do nothing that makes the authority uncomfortable? Even when said authority is violating the rights of others?

      We are nowhere near this being a danger in the US.

      --
      Qxe4
    88. Re:I recommend ... by LurkerXD · · Score: 1

      Odd that you mention that, because my mother worried about the exact thing when I was younger. When going through a foreign airport while we switched flights, she told us to keep quiet; she figured if me and my brother started going on about some video game, the only word out of the conversation that'll easily get recognized is "bomb" (or variations thereof), and the airport security would freak. That was pre-9/11, oh the fun it must be now...

    89. Re:I recommend ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I figure they'll need treatment to stop the hiccups from laughing so hard. Of course, they could use this treatment (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2299306).

    90. Re:I recommend ... by Eil · · Score: 1

      The education system isn't flawed, just that the standards for these types of positions are _incredibly_ low.

      This is a bit of an oxymoron: the system is flawed precisely because of the low standards for faculty and administrators. The only way to turn our public education system around is to invest heavily in it at all levels and weed out those who are just there for the paycheck and power trip. Hold teachers to higher standards than the students. In fact, the profession of "teacher" should be as noble and respected as a doctor or scientist. Allow parents and students to choose schools. Make high school more like college where the student is allowed to pursue (for the most part) their own interests. Don't design the entire curriculum around the lowest common denominator. Place some kind of limit on the importance of school sports. Teamwork, competition, and physical fitness are wonderful values to teach but they are *part* of a well-rounded education, not the majority of it. Dump money not into just school themselves, but education in general rather than occupying foreign countries. We can't fix the world until we fix ourselves first.

      </cranky old geezer rant>

    91. Re:I recommend ... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      teaching...being an underpaid and overworked profession.

      Too many teachers I've seen are people I would never pay to do anything, people unable to read a map or do long division. Stupidity is widespread and growing in public schools.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    92. Re:I recommend ... by MBaldelli · · Score: 1

      That everyone should stick some coloured wires into cardboard tubes, then leave them lying about all over the place. The more the merrier.

      This sort of reminds me of the television show I had seen some years back in the Middle East where the host of the show (or several of his co-hosts) would go to various parts of a city, act somewhat suspiciously and then leaving a briefcase in the middle of the road and run off suddenly in some random direction.

      Hilarity would ensue depending on the individuals had seen the host/co-hosts doing this. Some would run in the opposite direction thinking it a bomb. Others would chase down the man and try to apprehend him...

      I'm rather surprised this hasn't been recreated here in the states given the way we react to the dreaded plague knows as terrorism

      --
      "The truth points to itself." - Kosh, Babylon5
    93. Re:I recommend ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Stopping them from graduating high school is not enough. We need to stop them from _running_ high schools, as well.

    94. Re:I recommend ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once you've got an education degree, as a result of irrational choices when you were a kid in college, the fact that you continue to pursue a career in education rather than starting over in some other path doesn't necessarily mean you're still irrational.

      Given the conventional assumption that people become wiser as they age, I see no reason to believe that selection for late adolescent/early adult irrationality is enough to invalidate an economic/game theory model of behavior of school officials.

    95. Re:I recommend ... by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

      The basic reasoning boils down to the fact that the school officials will take little if any flack for over reacting in the name of safety, but they will lose their jobs and be raked through the mud if they fail to react to an "obvious" threat.

      That's the problem right there. There needs to be massive amounts of flack, public raking over the coals, and loss of employment, for school officials who commit such blatant acts of total abject brainlessness.

      Stupidity should be a disqualification for any position in the education system.

    96. Re:I recommend ... by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Displaying evidence of independent thought.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    97. Re:I recommend ... by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Fear of civil suit being brought by the parents against the school for the principle bearing false witness. So the typical legal counter attack, rather than admitting what is clearly their error, they will simply get the lawyers to distort reality and imply guilt on the parents part.

      Not much different than the university student with a tiny circuit board and some blinking lights, being arrested and some ass hat head of police frothing at the mouth about shooting her in the head.

      Out of control fear and ignorance, all being fed for political gain and that political gain being driven by nothing but greed. A society being driven out of control by corruption. The shear craziness nowadays, you can give your child a gun (in the US and other gun nut societies) but give them a chemistry or electronics set and low IQ gits with a bit of power will go nuts.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    98. Re:I recommend ... by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      You misunderstand rationality in game theory. Rationality in game theory is more concerned with risk avoidance, not gain maximization* (ie, managers would rather have a consistent fuck up than a high achiever that might crash and burn or simply leave the company**). More importantly, most management seems more interested in short-term risk avoidance and not long-term risk avoidance (think the difference between a person playing chess who makes the best trade-off for one round, purely on the value of a piece, vs the strategist who predicts many moves ahead and considered the value of many pieces in unison for the later state in the game).

      * This is an important point about rationality in game theory, actually. Consider the classic Prisoner's Dilemma.

      ** Look no further than how people consider Steve Jobs relationship with Apple and the tech market at large. There's a good deal of irrationality going on there. Whether there's hyper-rationality going on is another matter I'm not sure about.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    99. Re:I recommend ... by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      The problem with holding people accountable to false alarms is that then real alarms don't get raised. They weigh their self interest and decide that it's better to err on the side of "caution", which actually involves putting people at risk when something bad comes along.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    100. Re:I recommend ... by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well it's quite obvious. They couldn't find anything illegal or wrong whatsoever. So of course they're going to make up bullshit "the student needs counseling" and "he violated school policies" to make it sound like they aren't a bunch of incompetent shitheads.

      This happens all the time with terror suspects, like that guy who was puking in the bathroom on the plane a few weeks ago. He was labeled a "terrorist" because of the color of his skin and yet the government and the racist airline employee managed to come out looking like heroes. How? They spew this bullshit about "have to be cautious" and "he was suspicious" and they imply there was actually danger "we were lucky it was a false alarm".

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    101. Re:I recommend ... by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      That's his entire POINT. He didn't say it was a good adaptation, he just said it was AN adaptation.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    102. Re:I recommend ... by AGMW · · Score: 0

      ... If the kid was just tinkering and liked electronics, he probably would have loved to explain it.

      This is a bit disingenuous because if the device was a bomb (and remember that the Principle had absolutely no idea whether it was or not) the kid might have shown how it worked rather then just explained it! KAPOW!!

      ... and people suggesting suing the school for the cost of the false alarm aren't thinking it through either - like the fire brigade, ambulance, coast guard, etc, you WANT people to call in immediately if they see something amiss. I've certainly heard from fire officers that they'd rather have a (obviously non-malicious!) false call than not get called for a real fire, indeed some of my nephews thought there was a fire and called them. They arrive and it wasn't a fire but they made a point of saying just that to the boys - it was good to call us because you thought there was a fire!

      Of course perhaps the Principle could have talked to some of the Chemistry teachers, etc, (basically, anyone who has a clue!) to find out how likely it was to be a bomb first ...

      --
      Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
      handmadehands.co.uk
    103. Re:I recommend ... by siloko · · Score: 1

      I guess the principle could also factor in the times he knows of where 11 years olds have made bombs with evil intention . . .

    104. Re:I recommend ... by grahammm · · Score: 1

      If the vice-principal does not know anything about electronics then he should bring in one of his colleagues who does. If none of the teaching staff know anything about electronics (though surely at least one of the science or technology teachers will) the school lab technician(s) almost certainly will as they need that knowledge to do their job. Then let the staff member examine the device and see if it matches the description/explanation/functionality described by the student.

    105. Re:I recommend ... by heson · · Score: 1

      Policy in question: You may not make the school administration look dumb.

    106. Re:I recommend ... by Lundse · · Score: 1

      True. Stupidity accumulates in organizations and systems.
      The trick is to try and set up those organizations and systems to avoid the worst of this effect - eg. by publicly shaming and firing people for shit like this, so the next vice-principal will not "play it safe" by evacuating a school before talking to the kid or just looking at the goddamn thing...

      --
      IAIFARSIJDPOOTV - I Am In Fact A Reality Star; I Just Don't Play One On TV
    107. Re:I recommend ... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      You misunderstand. He's recommending the family get legal counsel. For their lawsuit against the school.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    108. Re:I recommend ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Of course, schools are designed to teach kids how the real world works."

      You would hope that from any school, so what is even more astounding and dismaying is this bit from their own web site,
      "Millennial Tech Middle School's Mission Statement: All Millennial Tech Middle School students will cultivate their technology skills to enhance their motivation and curiosity to excel academically in order to become productive citizens that will drastically impact the developing information age."

      They teach technology. So its utterly jaw dropping that no teacher at that school could understand what the kid had designed!. They are suppose to be a technology school. If they cannot recognize what the kid made, then how can they teach technology. Are they all as incompetent as this vice principal?!

      If that isn't bad enough, they then also add "he and his parents get counseling" ... I'm almost lost for words. Its the teachers who need counseling! They should also be fired as they clearly don't know what they claim to teach!

      I feel like writing to the school and the school governors to complain. Does anyone know who the school governors are and what is their complaints procedure? (is there an email address?), because I feel everyone who knows technology should make an email complaint against this school, to get the kid and his parents out of counseling and the vice principal reprimanded, fired or demoted from their job. They cannot be teachers if they don't understand what they claim to teach.

    109. Re:I recommend ... by c6gunner · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      That's a silly truism. NOBODY needs to win in order for us to lose, depending on your definition of loss. You may as well replace "terrorists" with "martians" or "pink unicorns". There's obviously a couple halfwits with mod-points kicking around, or you would never have gotten modded "insightful" for making such a pointless comment.

    110. Re:I recommend ... by Sauron23 · · Score: 1

      .. but authorities were recommending that he and his parents get counseling, ..

      The media doesn't state what authorities nor why they should seek counseling. Bad reporting. Again.
      The U.S. seemed to have become so fearful and litigious as to be paralysed sometimes.

    111. Re:I recommend ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is actually more scary than funny.

    112. Re:I recommend ... by the_womble · · Score: 1

      The principal not only could have, but SHOULD have interviewed the student to ascertain the risk.

      Why? He had no reason to think that there was any risk.

    113. Re:I recommend ... by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, it's ineptitude alright, but of a different kind. How come none of the teachers knew what this kid was going to make as a Science project? Aren't teachers supposed to be there to provide assistance with stuff like that?

      I remember many years ago getting a low grade for a programming assignment because the teachers didn't believe I could have built it on my own. This was at a time when I had no suitable computer at home and had to program everything in the classroom where they were supposed to be present; all my classmates have seen it slowly progressing over months but none of the teachers did.

      From my viewpoint, this story is kinda similar (although with a modern "the terrorists have already won" flavor on top). If the teachers had been doing their job, they would have known in advance exactly what he was going to make. And they would have properly recognized the kid's skills instead of advising counseling to never be creative again.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    114. Re:I recommend ... by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      I think it's this one under "Socially Responsible Behaviour";

      Litter – careless or intentional

      It was, after all, an empty plastic bottle.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    115. Re:I recommend ... by mwvdlee · · Score: 3, Informative

      Funny thing is; had it indeed been a bomb, they would have been too late as it was already inside the building.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    116. Re:I recommend ... by damburger · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm sure these people are devastated that a Random Slashdot Troll doesn't rate their intelligence...

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    117. Re:I recommend ... by damburger · · Score: 0, Troll

      Idiot. Teaching is not an 'easy' job. My wife teaches 9-10 year olds in the UK, and is normally working till 8 or 9 in the evening with marking, planning, and preparing materials. It might help to know something before you start typing.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    118. Re:I recommend ... by BlackBloq · · Score: 1

      They acted like little scared witch hunt bitches, where everything is an alert and a threat. These wankers spend all their time worrying about what colour alert is happening so they know how to put on their under ware in the morning. Nothing to do with any reality, safety or actual issue just MORE USA PARANOID BS! CALM THE FUCK DOWN. Coming up next, mandatory anal probes!

    119. Re:I recommend ... by Thetawaves · · Score: 1

      What a modest proposal.

    120. Re:I recommend ... by Wodin · · Score: 1

      This was not a science fair project. It was something he was working on by himself at home and decided to bring to school to show other pupils.

      --
      -- Wodin
    121. Re:I recommend ... by vlad30 · · Score: 1

      The principal doesn't know enough about electronics to to be sure whether it is a safe device, or is indeed a bomb.

      Not like their isn't a science capable teacher in the school to look at it but then again this is the USA

      --
      Your'e all thinking it, I just said it for you
    122. Re:I recommend ... by Dr+Damage+I · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why the hell would they recommend counseling for a non-violent and non-criminal act?

      By recommending something vaguely punitive (and "magnanimously" forgoing billing the childs family for the expense), the authorities are attempting to prevent blame from shifting from the child and his family to the place that it actually belongs: the authorities

      recommending counseling is an attempt to maintain the appearance that the child actually did something wrong.

      --
      "Cursed is he who rises early in the morning..." Isiah 5:11
    123. Re:I recommend ... by jonadab · · Score: 1

      No, what you do is, you get one of those extra-super-large jars of peanut butter, replace the lid with aluminum foil, attach a cheap analog alarm clock to the side with duct tape, wrap cheap jumper cables around the jar, pack it in a suitcase (fill up the remaining empty space with clothes), and take it with you on your next vacation. If they question you about why you have this stuff in your luggage, explain that some guy on the internet suggested it.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    124. Re:I recommend ... by komode0 · · Score: 1

      I didn't say it was easy. My dad is a teacher. The amount of vacation time happens to be one of the reasons why.

    125. Re:I recommend ... by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      That may be true, but the original poster did say "[t]he Terrorists have won and brought your society to their knees"; to which was replied "[w]e managed that all on our own thank you very much", and that started the whole argument.

      So you have just sided with the retort to the original poster. What was your point in arguing?

            -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    126. Re:I recommend ... by supercrisp · · Score: 1

      Um, my dad was a schoolteacher for 30 years, my mom a schoolboard member for 10. Based on the tales they told around the dinner table, it probably is stupidity. And I'll just add that my wife is pursuing a degree in instructional technology, so she takes classes with education people. In one class of graduate students two women were bragging about never having had to set foot in the library for their BAs. That's not just lazy; it's also stupid, failing to realize that the professor and half the class had just overlaid an "idiot" label on their faces. You might also stroll through an education department sometime at a major university. Those posters that look like children's junior high work? Those are graduate projects. And what really gets my goat is that most of these people are paid twice what doctorate-holding lecturers are paid at universities. And people with graduate degrees in biology, English, math, and so on aren't eligible to teach in high schools because they haven't taken those moronic education classes where you learn about "secret sharing" and how to make posters about Piaget's theories of development.... Anyone who can get a master's in anything other education could learn all that stuff in one semester-long class.

    127. Re:I recommend ... by lavardo · · Score: 1

      yeah, most intelligent principals...but apparently not the stupid principal @ a school that "emphasizes technology skills".

    128. Re:I recommend ... by supercrisp · · Score: 1

      Please note that this was a technical magnet school. Surely the principal of such a school should be able to make the most basic of calls, like "hmm, there's no ignition device." Or, at the very least, not wet himself the first time he sees a gadget with wires.

    129. Re:I recommend ... by lavardo · · Score: 1

      Why the hell would they recommend counseling for a non-violent and non-criminal act?

      Maybe it was just the Gatorade, he probably should have used Powerade.

    130. Re:I recommend ... by N+Monkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In most cases, "Don't make Admin look stupid, especially if they are." is implied policy #0..

      Sounds like they can manage that by themselves.

    131. Re:I recommend ... by DarkOx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The sad truth is nobody is thinking of the children. They are our future and it looks like a pretty bleak one right now. Where every kid who displays an ounce ingenuity, exceptional achievement, or even exceptional interest in a particular topic of field is labeled as a potential threat.

      How likely is this kid after this experience to want to participate in a science fair again? How likely is he to share is projects with teachers who might be able to mentor him? Now even if teachers would be willing to put the extra time in the kid is going to be afraid to ask.

      We are looking at a system that is effectively geared to NOT develop the talents of our best and brightest!

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    132. Re:I recommend ... by DarkOx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree the parents acted shamefully. I don't have any kids yet myself but my parents always knew enough about what I was doing that this sort of thing would not have caused them worry about me and instead cased them to get extremely defensive. They would have stuck up for me.

      I can hear mom now"
      "You're and idiot I am taking my son and leaving now; and don't you come anywhere near our house or is father will make you wish you didn't"

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    133. Re:I recommend ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have we forgotten how Alfred Nobel made a fortune?
      Hint: he invented an explosive ...

    134. Re:I recommend ... by mindaktiviti · · Score: 0, Redundant

      They are being recommended counseling because of all the emotional and psychological damage the SCHOOL caused on the child. Kinda like a child rapist recommending to the child that he gets counseling for being raped.

    135. Re:I recommend ... by Taimoor · · Score: 1

      This is why I like that, in Pennsylvania, institutions are billed for the cost of a false alarm. A minimum of $500 per incident.

      It's amazing how common sense prevails when there's money involved.

    136. Re:I recommend ... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      According to TFA, this is a school that "emphasizes technology skills". The principal SHOULD have had the tech skills to evaluate the project, or at least had plenty of access to someone who did -- maybe the kid's science teacher is a logical candidate??

      But no, instead here we go stifling innovation in the name of "a little temporary safety".

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    137. Re:I recommend ... by anyGould · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And, since they have NO evidence of ANYTHING, they will loose.

      Sadly, they won't lose.

      If the parents choose to make an issue out of this, the school division will line up solidly behind this guy, and it will sit in lawyer hell until after the kid's graduated. I know an example where the parent's lawyer told them it would cost $250,000 and ten years, and at the end the school will give them a very nice apology - basically, that it wasn't worth pursuing.

      The best solution for the kid and parents is preferably to change schools - the place advertises itself as a tech-focused school, but freaks out when kids make science projects? Barring that, you're stuck playing passive-aggressive with the admins - send notes excusing your kid from homework because of "concerns that it may be mistaken for explosive devices"...

    138. Re:I recommend ... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      There, in a nutshell, is what is wrong with parenting today:

      Your excellent and old-fashioned parents would have known enough to assume the best, and stuck up for their kid, and meanwhile you were allowed to do what normal kids do -- experiment with whatever comes to hand.

      Nowadays we squelch the experimenting in the name of safety, and castigate any parent or child who doesn't like being locked into the Safety Bubble. Thanks to the insanity of "zero tolerance" and "safety uber alis" and always assuming the worst, we're raising a generation of neurotics and incompetents. And quite possibly a generation of the worst sort of rebels, once they get out there on their own (think SDS, etc.)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    139. Re:I recommend ... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I think your tagline adequately illustrates the point. :/

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    140. Re:I recommend ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The billion dollar porn industry agrees with this sentiment.

    141. Re:I recommend ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank God Bill Gates didn't go to that school.

    142. Re:I recommend ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One principal doing one thing doesn't mean our society "has been brought to its knees".

      And things like this have happened before. I read of a case in the 70's where the bomb squad was called to a school, the student's backpack taken out to a field and blown up...because there were a couple of walkie-talkies in it.

      This sort of stupidity isn't new.

    143. Re:I recommend ... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Uh, thanks for the the thought. On the other hand, I hope the Finnish economy does really well. May you make lots of money.

      --
      Qxe4
    144. Re:I recommend ... by jlehtira · · Score: 1

      The principal doesn't know enough about electronics to to be sure whether it is a safe device, or is indeed a bomb. Additionally, the principal doesn't trust the student since if it is a bomb the student probably wouldn't admit to it.

      I thought it's pretty common knowledge that to make a bomb, one needs some explosive material, and that explosive materials are mostly homogenous solids or liquids. Further, to make a bomb of any significance, there needs to be a significant amount of said material. Such could be easily distinguished from electronics, which is wires between batteries, circuit boards, components and buttons, each of which is too small to have a significant amount of explosive in it.

      Actually I thought everybody knew that, but maybe I was wrong..

    145. Re:I recommend ... by Mad-Bassist · · Score: 1

      I'd say they need counseling for dealing with the stress of being practically accused of being terrorists and having their own property searched.

      There is a bad lack of detail indeed. It sounds to me like a couple questions and answers between the student and faculty would have cleared everything up in less than a minute. I really don't get their reaction coupled with the fact they're a "tech school."

      Maybe there is a need to be filled here--a school where kids are encouraged to use their imagination, and occasionally get to blow things up. Basic Pyrotechnics would be a popular subject and can be handled in a safe way, and may lead to fewer accidents at home. After all, houses with fireplaces have a much lower incidence of kids starting fires. ("Hey, a place in the house where there's supposed to be a fire!")

      Unfortunately, the basic model of public schools dates back two centuries when they needed people to work in factories. Independent thought is not productive when inspecting welds twelve hours per day.

      --
      "The only legitimate use of a computer is to play games." - Eugene Jarvis
    146. Re:I recommend ... by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Actually, part of the Massachusetts 1998 Gun Law stated that providing a handgun to any child under the age of 18, even for the purposes of instruction, was a felony.

      So, no - we couldn't even do that (I think said clause has since been rescinded, though).

    147. Re:I recommend ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone should really furnish the School Principal (and the cops) with a Venn diagram for this:

      Here's a good start guys - Bombs are things with wires, but (and this is important) NOT ALL THINGS WITH WIRES ARE BOMBS!

      Maybe we could make it a little pocket-sized one?

    148. Re:I recommend ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tricking people into interpreting the device as a bomb is probably a criminal act. If he intended to cause a scare then he could use some counseling.

    149. Re:I recommend ... by ananda59 · · Score: 1

      great idea,overwhelm the system and force them to evaluate situations a little more carefully before over-reacting. In this situation, shouldn't a principal at a school specializing in technology have a bit more of a clue in the subject area? Apparently anything this student was learning had little to do with the "hard work" of the school.

    150. Re:I recommend ... by fugue · · Score: 1
      One of the comments in the linked story (from tamooj) asks what is perhaps a more important question:

      Q. Why are journalists such as yourselves not asking any real, meaningful questions? Why are you simply (and lazily) just reiterating the "official statements" that officials in CYA-mode issue, and calling this the whole of the story? Sigh.

      The foundation of democracy is an educated voter base. As the last 9 years of US politics has shown, democracy here isn't worth the paper it's printed on. Why not? Perhaps in part because most "journalism" is re-wording press releases, not asking questions. If journalists actually did any work, the sheeple might at least see that the process of asking questions can exist, and can maybe even lead to actual answers. But when the only political discourse in the nation is people regurgitating press releases from think tanks or other marketing firms, when the very process of questioning something is invisible to anyone who isn't a scientist, how the hell can you expect to run a country?

      I have been told by journalists that there's some sort of "holy grail" of impartiality. They have tricked themselves into thinking that by having an opinion they are violating a public trust, and that by using their own brains and asking a question, they are inserting bias into their articles. I'm stunned that they think that neutrality can exist in the first place, and disgusted by the confluence of this fantasy and their laziness.

      --
      "The biggest problem with communication is the illusion that it has taken place."
    151. Re:I recommend ... by TENTH+SHOW+JAM · · Score: 1

      Why the hell would they recommend counseling for a non-violent and non-criminal act?

      If a bunch of firefighters had just stormed my science fair, and garage, and I had been doing my best to answer their questions, I'd be just a tad distraught. I may even need counselling to get over the emotional trauma.

      The other kind of counselling where the recipient is told not to do it again should be reserved for administrators who did not ask what the device is.

      --
      A sig is placed here
      To display how futile
      English Haiku is
    152. Re:I recommend ... by peterxyz · · Score: 1

      houses with fireplaces have a much lower incidence of kids starting fires.

      That'd be "starting fires outside the fireplaces" peter xyz

    153. Re:I recommend ... by TENTH+SHOW+JAM · · Score: 1

      possibly referring to

      The Millennial Tech experience will enhance educational opportunities, prepare students for the workplace and allow all individuals to feel comfortable and secure.

      Let's face it. Bringing in an item that may be a bomb is not going to make individuals feel comfortable and secure

      --
      A sig is placed here
      To display how futile
      English Haiku is
    154. Re:I recommend ... by quanticle · · Score: 1

      Rationality in game theory is more concerned with risk avoidance, not gain maximization*

      Well, if we're being precise, rationality in game theory is concerned with maximizing the expected return. This may involve making many small, relatively safe bets, or it may involve making a larger, more risky bet. It all depends on the probabilities and expected returns of the various outcomes being considered.

      That's why I say that management tends to select against rationality. Most managers I've seen do not make any sort of rational calculation of probabilities and outcomes when making decisions. They leave these things to "gut instincts". Time and again, scientific studies have shown that gut instincts can be quite easily and predictably manipulated.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    155. Re:I recommend ... by quanticle · · Score: 1

      Its not silly in the context of this discussion. The OP is saying that we have not lost (e.g. given up our civil liberties, accepted significant restrictions on our freedoms, etc.) just because Osama bin Laden has not declared victory. I say that's a false argument: we can lose without our enemies declaring victory.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    156. Re:I recommend ... by fishexe · · Score: 1

      The school's statement makes no sense either. The school's policies are published here I don't see where he ran afoul of them.

      Under academic honesty, the bullet-point for fabrication, since clearly he fabricated the device.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    157. Re:I recommend ... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      The OP is saying that we have not lost (e.g. given up our civil liberties, accepted significant restrictions on our freedoms, etc.) just because Osama bin Laden has not declared victory.

      Nope, never said that. Now you're just making shit up.

    158. Re:I recommend ... by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Where every kid who displays an ounce ingenuity, exceptional achievement, or even exceptional interest in a particular topic of field is labeled as a potential threat.

      I think that's a dramatic overstatement. Had the kid written a brilliant essay, been interested in chemical engineering, or made working TV out of household parts, he would not have been labeled a threat, it hasn't gotten that absurd yet.

      Wires in plastic bottle is, yes, a ridiculous thing to get upset about, but it's a far cry from labeling everything exceptional a threat.

      How likely is this kid after this experience to want to participate in a science fair again? How likely is he to share is projects with teachers who might be able to mentor him? Now even if teachers would be willing to put the extra time in the kid is going to be afraid to ask.

      Pretty likely, at least he's getting some excitement and attention from it. That's better than most primary school science education. Stephen Jay Gould said about his primary and high school science education something along the lines of "the best thing I can say about it is that it didn't completely kill my interest in science." I feel that too, science is exciting and it's taught all too often like a list of things to memorize. It really turns a lot of kids off of science in the end. A little excitement like this might be the wind that strengthens the tree.

      The radioactive boyscout, the teenager who tried to build a breeder reactor in his basement seems to have not been deterred by the attention, FBI investigation, extreme levels of radiation he exposed himself too, or apparently his own mother whose property got designated a superfund site.

      The guy apperantly is still trying to become a nuclear scientist and was arrested in 2007 for stealing smoke detectors for the radioactive materials.

      So I think this might encourage him actually.

    159. Re:I recommend ... by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      Well, if we're being precise, rationality in game theory is concerned with maximizing the expected return. This may involve making many small, relatively safe bets, or it may involve making a larger, more risky bet. It all depends on the probabilities and expected returns of the various outcomes being considered.

      Even more technically, rationality in game theory is based upon Rational Choice Theory, in which "'rationality' simply means that a person reasons before taking an action" and of which all its model "all assume individuals choose the best action according to stable preference functions and constraints facing them." To that end, there are both risk aversion and gain maximization strategies. The issue then becomes that a Vice Principal or most middle management in general has very little possibility to maximally gain if they're generally unqualified for very high management positions* or if simply those positions don't grant you very much advantage over your current position. Hence, I'd argue that most managers are in fact risk aversion, CEOs are more risk taking, and companies (and schools) try to make higher positions look tempting enough so that middle management doesn't just slide into heavily risk aversion behavior.

      *Consider that in a situation where you could have an 85% of continuing as normal for years if you're risk aversion, then to overall commit a series of actions that only has about a 50% chance of succeeding, the reward would have to be a 70% reward. I'm not sure, but I don't think the Principal or Superintendent makes 170% of what the Vice Principal makes.

      Looking further, on Salary.com, I get some funny results for the United States. Median Elementary School Teacher pay: $50,227. Median High School Teacher pay: $52,372. Median Assistant Principal pay: $75,402. Median Prinicipal pay: $73,536. Median Superintendent pay: $74,733.

      In short, on probability it makes sense for teachers to go from 85% safe to 63% safe (or 99% safe to 73% safe) but management looks like it should try to stay as safe as possible, unless it's eyeing to leave the school system for a better management position.

      That's why I say that management tends to select against rationality. Most managers I've seen do not make any sort of rational calculation of probabilities and outcomes when making decisions. They leave these things to "gut instincts". Time and again, scientific studies have shown that gut instincts can be quite easily and predictably manipulated.

      And, I'd argue that that is risk aversion. The idea is pretty simple. If you're a common person in a position of authority, you can take the "gut instincts" position and most other common people will not retaliate against your decision, no matter how irrational, because they would have made the same decision. Look no further than how many people in the US seem to choose Presidents based upon "I could sit and have a drink with him", not "he's more qualified than me and would make better decisions than me"**. Being able to shoot from the hip and make generally agreeable statements and positions is more likely to make you popular than being considerate and stable, carefully weighing your choices. Since, short of gross negligence/rule violation/law violation, a Vice Principal is only likely to be fired because of voter pressure on the School Board, gut instincts seems like the natural way to act for the position.

      **The latest election of Barack Ob

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    160. Re:I recommend ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Class, this is what we call a "persecution complex".

    161. Re:I recommend ... by cmarkn · · Score: 1

      It wasn’ the kid that made the vice-principal look stupid, it was the police. They completely overreacted and made a silly situation hazardous.

      --
      People should not fear their government. Governments should fear their people.
    162. Re:I recommend ... by SilasMortimer · · Score: 1

      I am sorry to tell you this guys but, you (USA) have lost the war against terrorism.

      Don't you understand the situation? How could they know that the boy hadn't joined the Al Qaeda Youth Group and created his metal detector to find coins to help fund further terrorist attacks?

      Think, people!

      --
      Omnes tuae crepidines sunt nobis sunt. Ascendo tuum!
    163. Re:I recommend ... by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 1

      And now we know the REAL story behind the Matrix: it was a school building!

    164. Re:I recommend ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parent poster is likely a teacher who got passed over for an administrator position by a PE teacher with a teaching job less than 5 years.

    165. Re:I recommend ... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      I agree, but also blame our failing school system that has kept dropping down its standards for so long, that you would never expect a kid his age to be able to create such a complex device, however crude the components were.
      If you look at yesteryears projects, and compare them to today's, on a ratio that is...not the unique exceptions...
      the projects are getting less and less impressive....some I would say are a mere farce compared to what they were say 10 or 15 years ago.

    166. Re:I recommend ... by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      Why the hell would they recommend counseling for a non-violent and non-criminal act?

      Conseling for the fact that your 'education' is supposedly coming from these idiots.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    167. Re:I recommend ... by Vexar · · Score: 1

      I see a very clear ramification: defamation of character lawsuit. Show negligence on the part of the vice-principal. Record the humiliation and emotional trauma of the poor kid being picked on, teased, mocked, for what probably was a well-intended science project at a tech school. If the kid followed any of the guidelines for a science fair project, he should have submitted designs and worked with his teacher on it. I notice no discussion of the electronics/ general science teacher was involved. Some of this story is missing. This is LOUSY journalism.

    168. Re:I recommend ... by mhajicek · · Score: 1

      Before claiming that something looks like a bomb perhaps one should actually know something about what a bomb might look like.

    169. Re:I recommend ... by mhajicek · · Score: 1

      Actually the "war on terrorism" is a "war OF terrorism" that our government is waging against her people. In that light our government has been winning soundly.

    170. Re:I recommend ... by mhajicek · · Score: 1

      So how do they arrange for a CIA operative to help them past security?

    171. Re:I recommend ... by mhajicek · · Score: 2, Informative

      At least there was plasticine. Plasticine + wires + electronic components COULD be a bomb. An empty bottle with wires and components cannot be a bomb.

    172. Re:I recommend ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he's just a moron who's never studied anything technical. He probably has a degree in "_____ Studies," and a Masters in "Education."

      In other words, he knows nothing, has learned nothing, and arrogates to himself credentials a glorified babysitter has no business claiming.

    173. Re:I recommend ... by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Ok. Bombs are not made of wires. They're made of explosive materials. It's pretty damned easy to look at something and tell if it contains anything that could be an explosive or just a plastic bottle with wire wrapped around it.

      A vice principal saw the student showing it to other students at school about 11:40 a.m. Friday and was concerned that it might be harmful...

      Luque [SDFD] said the project was made of an empty half-liter Gatorade bottle with some wires and other electrical components attached. There was no substance inside.

      So, what we have here is a complete idiot Vice Principal thinking, in passing, the kid has a bomb.

      With idiots like this in charge, I'd've ended up in prison with the odd things I built as science projects when I was in school. Thank God people weren't so paranoid and stupid 30 years ago. And for the record, my high school had infinitely more dangerous stuff in the chemistry supply room. (that actually did require the bomb squad for safe disposal... a bottle of nitroglycerin and a bottle of bromide in an asbestos lined can.)

    174. Re:I recommend ... by Geekbot · · Score: 1

      All the comments are mentioning the ineptitude, outright stupidity, of school officials. And of course they are absolutely right. But I'm surprised no one is writing about the poor article here.

      Authorities: Who are these authorities? I don't know and the reporter should be informing us. For nothing else, at least to have someone to ridicule publicly.

      School policy: If the school official gives a quote about school policy AND the author includes it, that reporter should be questioning those details before using the quote or else pointing out how the school official couldn't provide any documentation for his made-up allegations.

    175. Re:I recommend ... by Klintus+Fang · · Score: 1

      while I agree that the school completely over reacted, there was no science fair involved. this was a science project the kid was working on at home that he brought to school just to show his classmates. the article makes no mention of it being a class project or part of any science fair.

      --
      In a minute there is time For decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse. -T.S. Eliot
    176. Re:I recommend ... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I can hear mom now"

      "You're and idiot I am taking my son and leaving now; and don't you come anywhere near our house or is father will make you wish you didn't"

      Because we all know that insulting people and threatening violence is always the best way to resolve a problem.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    177. Re:I recommend ... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      And if they're not a teacher at all, why, as a manager, would they want to work in a school?

      No, if you're a manager, why wouldn't you want to work in a school? At least there is a good reason for the instituion's existence, not everyone wants to devote their lives to making money.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    178. Re:I recommend ... by pax+humana · · Score: 1

      "The education system isn't flawed"
      Yes it is. At least from my POV. Some other slasher beat me to the punch - See http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/ for a history of where we went wrong. The Prussian government designed the education system we use to prevent the proletariat from revolting (double entendre intended). If you take the POV of the American elite/aristocrats, then our education system is working perfectly well.
      "As I learned in school, the first thing you do with a class is level their knowledge." - a young friend of mine with a BA in secondary education (name withheld to protect the young and ignorant)

    179. Re:I recommend ... by MedBob · · Score: 1

      "take the risk of trusting the student" and the whole "flavor" of your message describe someone that is just bumping along, doing "their job". We can't afford that type of administrator in our schools any more. Did this Vice know the student in question? Did he know of his reputation? Was he aware of his grades? Had he talked to his teachers about him? Here he was, in a situation that called for a quick decision, and he had failed to do his homework!
      The question facing this vice went well beyond his "trust" of the student. A vice at a technical school should be conversant with science and technology. They could have had an interesting discussion of the device, the principles behind it's operation, any testing that the lad had done, etc. The vice could have easily obtained sufficient information to make an informed decision about hitting the panic button. That is, unless, again, he had failed to do his homework.

      We have far too many adults in our schools today who have no drive to fill the calling, rather than performing the tasks. There are many who are not interested in "intellectual curiosity", but want a checklist for learning. Since there is no competition, there is safety and tenure. I'm sure that these kinds of folks laugh over their cuppa, checking their watch to find that they have two minutes left before they have to go back and deal with the monsters.

      Don't take me wrong. There are many who care, but my point is that there are many who don't. This vice might be OK. I can't stereotype based on the limited info in the article. I just know that based on what I see (on one end), and the dwindling supply of parts at the local Radio Shack, it does not bode well for the technological future for lads like this who have not yet experienced the snuffing of the spark.

      My hope and prayer is that this lad will rise above the insult and embarrassment. And that somebody will evaluate this vice to see if he's a help or a hindrance where he's chosen to reside.

    180. Re:I recommend ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has anyone ever considered that the San Diego media has not published the entire story? Well consider it.....

    181. Re:I recommend ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recommend you DON'T believe everything you read in the news.....

    182. Re:I recommend ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do not believe everything you read in the media!

  2. We're on our way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To an Idiocracy!

    Public school administrators are leading the way!

    1. Re:We're on our way! by Jason+Earl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And the politicians wonder why it is that America has trouble getting kids interested in the sciences.

      I can understand that an assistant principle might not have any idea how bombs are made. There's no shame in that. However, he probably should have talked to the child's teacher before he called the fire department. My guess is that the kid had to tell his teacher ahead of time what he was making. I have never heard of a science fair where you weren't required to pre-register your experiment. How hard would it have been to talk the the science teacher before calling the bomb squad?

      Now, if the teacher thought that the device was a bomb (especially if he knew before hand that the kid was working on a proximity detector) then shame on him. I mean seriously, how hard would it have been to do a little research beforehand.

    2. Re:We're on our way! by vurian · · Score: 0, Troll

      Not "principle" -- "principal". Get some vocabulary!

    3. Re:We're on our way! by lagfest · · Score: 1, Funny

      Are you by any chance related to any of these guys? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8fbrUjjivw

    4. Re:We're on our way! by stiggle · · Score: 4, Informative

      Reading the article (I know, but someone has to :-) ) it seems that it wasn't a Science Fair project, it was just something the kid had been playing around with at home and then brought it in to show his friends. The kid violated school policies and that is why they said he should get counselling.

      So the school has a policy banning kids from being inventive and wanting to show that inventiveness off. Anyway - thats one kid the school system has scared off technology - well done San Diego Unified School District.

    5. Re:We're on our way! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I wonder what the policy is. No bringing stuff with wires to school? No bringing stuff that might be a bomb to school?

      A computer would violate the first one. Apparently a water bottle would violate the second.

    6. Re:We're on our way! by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "I can understand that an assistant principle might not have any idea how bombs are made. There's no shame in that."

      Say WHAT?

      Explosives are a basic application of science, and any well-rounded person should have a fair idea how bombs work and thus how to make them.

      When I was going to school back in the Cretaceous period, there was plenty of information on explosives in the school library, They were treated as something ordinary (possibly reflecting the "Greatest Generation" folks who ran things back in the 1960s/70s) along with all sorts of military info.

      Now get off my lawn, which BTW I didn't blow up with my chemistry set.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    7. Re:We're on our way! by x_IamSpartacus_x · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Students were evacuated from Millennial Tech Magnet Middle School in the Chollas View neighborhood Friday afternoon after an 11-year-old student brought a personal science project that he had been making at home to school, authorities said.

      TFA says the student had been making this thing in his garage and was just showing it to his friends when the VP saw it and said it looks dangerous. This is DEFINITELY an overreaction but it was not a school sanctioned project that the VP saw and flipped out about. This kid brought a crazy lookin thing into school without warning any administrators they flipped. The policy he violated was probably against bringing electronic things like that into school without approval.

    8. Re:We're on our way! by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      A computer would also violate the second.

    9. Re:We're on our way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The kid violated school policies and that is why they said he should get counselling.

      I would suggest that he now needs counselling to get over the stress of this incident. Not counselling for violating school policies.

    10. Re:We're on our way! by Lorens · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Reading the article (I know, but someone has to :-) ) it seems that it wasn't a Science Fair project, it was just something the kid had been playing around with at home and then brought it in to show his friends. The kid violated school policies

      No he didn't... the school policies are here:

      http://www.mtechmiddle.org/apps/pages/index.jsp?uREC_ID=58810&type=d&termREC_ID=&pREC_ID=87933&hideMenu=1&rn=8708720

      After looking twice I can't even find the part where it says "may not bring guns or knives or other weapons", let alone "may not bring anything that could possibly at a distance be mistaken for something dangerous".

      and that is why they said he should get counselling.

      Personally I think the school should pay for counseling, since the only reason he would need it is for the trauma of being treated like a terrorist :-)

      So the school has a policy banning kids from being inventive and wanting to show that inventiveness off. Anyway - thats one kid the school system has scared off technology - well done San Diego Unified School District.

      The ironic thing is that this is supposed to be a "Tech Magnet" school. Quoting from their mission statement:

      All Millennial Tech Middle School students will cultivate their technology skills to enhance their motivation and curiosity to excel academically in order to become productive citizens that will drastically impact the developing information age.

      All Millennial Tech Middle School students will cultivate their science, technology, engineering, and mathematics skills to enhance their motivation to excel academically in order to become global leaders and productive citizens in their chosen career path.

      That sounds like the kids might be expected to construct fun things related to science.

      Granted, it also sounds like you should expect your kid to be traumatized by the teachers. Not by the police, though.

    11. Re:We're on our way! by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Heck, a child would violate the second.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    12. Re:We're on our way! by sznupi · · Score: 1

      BTW, consider: the "Greatest Generation" folks who ran things back in the 1960s/70s are the ones who shaped people running the show today.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    13. Re:We're on our way! by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

      Why would the kid need counselling? Do they think he is mentally disturbed for making a home made electronics project?

    14. Re:We're on our way! by coolgeek · · Score: 1

      Actually, there is some shame in that. A vice principal of a Tech Magnet School should have enough skill to discern whether a science project is harmful or not. If he wants to be of service to his students, he should step aside and make room for someone who has the skills.

      --

      cat /dev/null >sig
    15. Re:We're on our way! by coolgeek · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can read them here. If you can see where the kid violated school policy, I'd appreciate it if you could explain it to me.

      --

      cat /dev/null >sig
    16. Re:We're on our way! by pyite · · Score: 1

      This kid brought a crazy lookin thing into school

      Could you share with us your definition of a "crazy lookin [sic] thing"? I'm not very old and I brought homemade electronics into middle and high school on occasion and no one blinked an eye. If anything, this student's behavior should be encouraged and expected at a magnet school.

      If wires sticking out of something are reason for alarm, then I think this clueless administrator would be very concerned if he walked around an engineering department at any university. This kid should not be punished for being precocious.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    17. Re:We're on our way! by anwaya · · Score: 1
      I've asked the fire department official who was quoted asserting that the school's policies were violated to tell me what policy was violated, with that very link to the school's policy statement in the request.

      No reply yet.

    18. Re:We're on our way! by cntThnkofAname · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be so sure. Most of /. is pointing to the teacher ineptitude on this one, and I agree.

      I did a science fair project in 2005 (I was in 10th grade) that was far worse IMO that this. Doing the science fair was a requirement that I had no interest in, and my science teacher (being a good teacher) saw this immediately and decided work with us (I had a partner). We ended up building two 2 meter tall hair spray cannons that launched tennis balls, so we could study the effect of weight and density on the flight path of spherical objects through the atmosphere. I could tell he pulled some strings for us because every teacher was asking us how far the things went, ect (we could get a standard tennis ball to travel 1000 feet, campus security found that interesting too). While we didn't win anything, were certainly had the most popular booth at the fair.

      Looking back, this project is one of the major reasons why I am enrolled in a science degree.

    19. Re:We're on our way! by x_IamSpartacus_x · · Score: 1

      My definition of a "crazy lookin thing" is, quite clearly, not important. You could try to ask the VP of this school as his judgment is the one in question but I doubt he is responding to questions at this time. As I said in my post above, this is DEFINITELY an overreaction. All I was pointing out is that the GP erroneously assumed that this was some sort of school science project and it clearly was not. Slashdot's summary is mostly trolling us into believing that the school asked this kid to bring it and then got him in trouble for it. This kid made this motion detector ON HIS OWN and the school had nothing to do with it. There is probably a school policy that says something to the effect of "you must have teacher/administration approval to bring any electronic device into school".

      Wires sticking out of something, in my opinion, are not a reason for alarm. In the VP of this middle schools opinion, they are.

    20. Re:We're on our way! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, I can see a problem already. The school allows sweater vests on Friday. That's not acceptable.

      Okay, back on topic. Perhaps he was making an inappropriate public display of affection with his Gatorade bottle?

      I also like how they're worried someone using a cell phone before or after school might take away from the safety and attractiveness of campus.

    21. Re:We're on our way! by kandela · · Score: 1

      But in this case the (vice) principal is nobody's pal!

      --
      Conservation of angular momentum makes the world go round.
    22. Re:We're on our way! by gnapster · · Score: 1

      Explosives are a basic application of science, and any well-rounded person should have a fair idea how bombs work and thus how to make them.

      It is worth noting that the Nobel Peace Prize exists precisely because the inventor of dynamite didn't realize that explosives could be used to harm people until after he invented it.

    23. Re:We're on our way! by topham · · Score: 1

      To put it in perspective, dynamite was invented to reduce injuries for mining and construction. (Blowing up mountains). He wasn't looking to build a weapon. Never mind that dynamite isn't a particularly great weapon.

    24. Re:We're on our way! by camperdave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Considering that the Nobel family owned and operated an armaments factory, I find that difficult to believe.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    25. Re:We're on our way! by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      Good catch. In my defence, I haven't had reason to spell that particular word in a long time.

    26. Re:We're on our way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, kids shouldn't ever bring in neat things they've been working on to show their friends and teachers. They might learn something other than the 'official lesson of the day' or something.

    27. Re:We're on our way! by jimicus · · Score: 1

      There isn't anything in the policy which states "Students shall not bring a hungry, ill-tempered crocodile to class - even if they have all necessary permits to keep such an animal".

      But I bet you the first student who did this would be in trouble.

    28. Re:We're on our way! by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      It's obvious the kid violated school policies, and therefore needs councelling.

      SCHOOL DRESS

      As a student of MTM, you are given the opportunity to dress for success and represent Millennial with pride.

      Monday-Thursday students may wear their choice of:
              MTM Polo Shirt
              MTM pants, shorts, or skirt
              MTM outerwear: sweater, hooded sweatshirt, or track jacket
              Footwear: close-toed shoes

      It is not explained in the article, but the kid wore flip-flops on a Wednesday.

            -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    29. Re:We're on our way! by anyGould · · Score: 1

      Found it (emphasis mine):

      Socially Responsible Behavior includes, but is not limited to the following:

      The Administrative Golden Rule strikes again.

    30. Re:We're on our way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, reading the school's policy, as linked by someone above, you find out that there are NO POLICIES that have anything remotely to do with science projects and what not to bring in (other than guns, knives, and bombs, et cetera). Clearly he didn't bring in a bomb, as they found, so what policy, praytell, did he violate?

      If the vice principal had found it lying around unattended, I can see where he might become alarmed. But for crying out loud, he saw the student showing it to other students. Why did he not go to the student and ask him what it was? Now, if the student says "it's a bomb", then ya, call the police and teach him not to joke about that sort of thing (for the same reason that we don't fake a heart attack as a joke). If it had been me, I would have made him stand up in front of everyone and explain how it worked (which is what the student was doing anyway) -- especially since this is supposed to be a school that focuses on technology. Let everyone learn from his project.

      Even all that would have been acceptable had he not gone and recommended the student to get counseling. Counseling? COUNSELING?!? What for? For being innovative and developing his thinking? Is independent thinking now an undesirable trait? I don't know about anyone else, but it was my ability to think for myself that made me a professional technologist. I sincerely hope that his parents are able to counter this crap and keep encouraging him to think and invent -- otherwise, that young man is going to shy away from his gift and end up trying to do something that he really isn't much good at.

      I call BS on this vice principal, and if I was on the school board, I would be calling for his resignation or termination.

    31. Re:We're on our way! by mhajicek · · Score: 1

      Before making such an assertion, go look it up. The school policies have been posted. Which one was violated?

    32. Re:We're on our way! by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      After looking twice I can't even find the part where it says "may not bring guns or knives or other weapons"

      Well, there's probably not a clause stating that you can't bring in nuclear missiles, either.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    33. Re:We're on our way! by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Never mind that dynamite isn't a particularly great weapon.

      Well, it's quite good at blowing things up, which can be useful in a war.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    34. Re:We're on our way! by pax+humana · · Score: 1

      The word you're looking for is kakistocracy. http://www.answers.com/topic/kakistocracy

  3. Remove the colored chalk . . . by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 4, Funny

    I told ye it was forged by Lucifer himself!

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
    1. Re:Remove the colored chalk . . . by melikamp · · Score: 1

      It's a gateway substance to LSD, for sure.

    2. Re:Remove the colored chalk . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      At least it isn't as dangerous as a #3 pencil.

  4. Counseling gets the school off the hook by russotto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What's the student supposed to get counseling for? The trauma the school put him through for no reason? More likely, so the school authorities can point to the fact that the kid got counseling to show something is wrong with him (and not them)

    I'd like to recommend the authorities get some counseling. Either that, or a clue, but counseling is easier to come by.

    1. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by motek · · Score: 3, Funny

      Perhaps they meant the vice principal was to seek counseling? Otherwise his fears may simply stop his poor heart one day.

      --
      I would like to die like my grandfather did - sleeping. And not screaming in terror, like his passengers.
    2. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      I'd like to recommend the authorities get some counseling. Either that, or a clue, but counseling is easier to come by.

      Ya, counseled not to take a job at "Millennial Tech Magnet Middle School" if they are scared shitless of technology!

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    3. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What's the student supposed to get counseling for?

      Counsel, as in legal counsel perhaps. That's who I would talk to first.

      Instead of an abject apology, the school has the gall to toss the blame on the parents and student? Good thing the school emphasizes technology, I can't imagine what sort of idiot is the vice principal for a 'normal' school.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      It doesn't sound like we have the whole story.

      OK, I'll play. I bet the rest of the story is the kid made his eyes glow and exposed his erectile fangs! Now there's the rest of the story, Mr. Harvey.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    5. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by Ilkhan28 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ^^^ This (agree with russotto) Ok, you're 11 years old and your teachers and principal call the local authorities on you because of a project they assigned you to do, but thought the project looked like a suspicious "device"? Can you imagine how scary that would be for a kid that old? Yeah I would say he will need counseling, but for what the school principal put him through. If it were me, I would be trying to tell them what my project was over and over. And maybe this kid was doing that too, but of course, no one was listening to an 11 year old kid. Also I remember enough about science projects in school that in most cases all of them had to be approved by the teachers, initially to make sure it fits in with what lessons are being taught. At least I can't see how a teaching system would get away with just assigning students to go and work on projects, but not really making sure the student is on the right track. This whole event could now make the kid a social pariah, most of us here probably know how cruel some kids that age range can be to others. I'm not a parent but I would almost guess thats something worth taking legal actions against the school.

    6. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "What's the student supposed to get counseling for?"

      It's quick, cheap, and simple. The kid needs to be counseled that some people are easily frightened. Some people are ignorant. Some people aren't the least bit intellectually curious. Some people are idiots. Most importantly, people who have all of these characteristics, plus psychopathic behavior, are elevated to positions of power and authority. Just like his associate principal. Of course, the kid's probably already figured that out.

    7. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by uglyduckling · · Score: 4, Informative

      Looking at the article, it sounds as if he brought his own personal project in, not something for a science class. It sounds like he's a bit of an electronics nut, and brought something in to show his friends which the teachers then found suspicious. I can kind-of see both sides, but I don't think the boy has any blame. I used to do this all the time when I was at school, in fact I'm pretty sure the things we used to do during lunch break in the science and computer labs would get us suspended or arrested these days.

    8. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by brunokummel · · Score: 1

      nah , I think the kid was up to something! I mean it is a kid, after all .. Maybe he switched his project to a motion detector because he couldn't find all the plutoniun he needed...
      1. Motion detector
      2. ??
      3. Boom!

      --
      What is best in life? To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you and to hear the lamentations of their women.
    9. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by Narpak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or maybe the kid was trying to impress his friends by acting like the thing was a bomb. While I'm sure the school/police/fire dept overreacted, kids do strange stuff and often don't realize the consequences of their actions.

      All that is mentioned in the article is:

      Maurice Luque, spokesman for the San Diego Fire-Rescue Department, said the student had been making the device in his home garage. A vice principal saw the student showing it to other students at school about 11:40 a.m. Friday and was concerned that it might be harmful, and San Diego police were notified.

      The school, which has about 440 students in grades 6 to 8 and emphasizes technology skills, was initially put on lockdown while authorities responded.

      Both the student and his parents were "very cooperative" with authorities, Luque said. He said fire officials also went to the student's home and checked the garage to make sure items there were neither harmful nor explosive.

      The student will not be prosecuted, but authorities were recommending that he and his parents get counseling, the spokesman said. The student violated school policies, but there was no criminal intent, Luque said.

      Now I can't say what policies he might have violated; though from what little is said in the article one is left with the impression that the vice principal in question overacted (or erred on the side of caution). I can understand that after going through such an event that the kid in question might need a bit of counselling to deal with the fact that he got hanged out in-front of the whole school as a possible terrorist. So I hope that is what they are talking about, and not that he "needs counselling" because he inadvertently scared a frightened adult administrator.

    10. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I would really like to know what policies these are, specifically. I'm too tired of hearing about people being raked through the mud for violating so-called policies.

      Once, when I was a student, I tried to get a copy of the school's policy manual. I was politely but firmly told to sit down and shut up. To be honest, I don't believe that such things even exist, or if they are they are so broadly defined as to be useless for informing behaviour.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    11. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 2, Funny

      Alternatively, he might be the school hero for getting everyone sent home early for the day!

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    12. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the student supposed to get counseling for? The trauma the school put him through for no reason? More likely, so the school authorities can point to the fact that the kid got counseling to show something is wrong with him (and not them)

      I'd like to recommend the authorities get some counseling. Either that, or a clue, but counseling is easier to come by.

      Let's stick a few colored wires up the principal's ass and call the bomb squad on him.

      If he doesn't blow up, send him for "counseling".

    13. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by TapeCutter · · Score: 0, Troll

      "What's the student supposed to get counseling for?"

      To cover the principal's arse, again.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    14. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by Narpak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Once, when I was a student, I tried to get a copy of the school's policy manual. I was politely but firmly told to sit down and shut up. To be honest, I don't believe that such things even exist, or if they are they are so broadly defined as to be useless for informing behaviour.

      Policies must always be worded in such a convoluted way as to remain open to any interpretation most serving the administration at any given time. Asking for the policy documentation is in itself a breach of policy and highly suspicious and subversive behaviour. Any questioning of authority is a sign of anti-social and destructive behaviour.

    15. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to recommend the authorities get some counseling. Either that, or a clue, but counseling is easier to come by.

      I'd like to recommend the authorities terminate all science education in schools. Just a bunch of homegrown madrasas and terrorist training camps is all they are.

      Don't believe me? If we'd stopped all this science foolishness in the 1930s, we wouldn't have all these nuclear bombs bouncing around the world.

      Q.E.D.

    16. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by HalfFlat · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now I can't say what policies he might have violated; ...

      Someone on the comment thread attached to the FA gave an actual link to the school's actual policies.

      There's nothing there about bringing in an electronics project, though I guess there was always the possibility that he was so enamored with it that he engaged in a "public display of affection".

    17. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by FSWKU · · Score: 1

      And a detached, disinterested voice crackles over the school's PA system:
      "Anti-social behavior detected in indoctrination room A-127. Report. React. Contain. Civil Protection teams dispatched."

      All the while, a kindly looking older man in a brown suit appears on the classroom television reminding all students of how primitive humanity remains, how the system is only there to help us out of the primordial abyss, and to "be safe...be....aware..."

      --
      "So after all this, you make my case for me. To end this stalemate, you must die..."
    18. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by jamesh · · Score: 1

      What's the student supposed to get counseling for?

      According to TFA, "The student violated school policies". I can't think what possible school policy it could be unless the device was deliberately designed to look like a bomb, but that would be against the law anyway. Or maybe it was supposed to be a motion sensitive camera to put in the girls changing rooms? He is 11 after all :)

      I suspect that the vice-principal went to press the "independent thought alarm" but pressed the security button instead by mistake.

    19. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by Narpak · · Score: 1

      Freedom is slavery
      Ignorance is strength

    20. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by damburger · · Score: 1

      The student is to be counseled on what behavior is not going to upset the absurd and bloated systems that infest western institutions (public and private) like cancer.I know each generation thinks it is witnessing the Big Decline but I can point to actual problems rather than just a vague sense of social dread. I've already posted some of them in this thread, but to summarize; the attempt to use the power of the 'Invisible Hand' to bring all sectors of society the kind of roaring success we have seen in the sub-prime mortgage market. If this were a single, aborted experiment it wouldn't be so bad - but its become an unfalsifiable, almost religious dogma that is applied over and over again regardless of its previous failure.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    21. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by damburger · · Score: 1

      It wasn't me, it was the nasty policy that did it! As the Milgram experiment showed, about two-thirds of humans have an astounding capacity for deferring all responsibility for their actions when they are part of a heirarchy. At least the results in this case were comparatively benign.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    22. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And people wonder why America's falling behind in science.

    23. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by Jesus_666 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Remember that motion detectors are an important part of Claymore mines and sentry guns. It's a wonder nobody was killed or worse.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    24. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by Myopic · · Score: 1

      No, they don't. The reasons America is falling behind in science are very clear and unambiguous. I don't know a single person who disagrees with the generally accepted reasons.

    25. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by Moridin42 · · Score: 1

      I like the "and emphasizes technology skills" bit myself.

      Perhaps a school that seeks to focus on technical skills should hire administrators with same. Ones whose mind will not be blown when, you know, actual technology shows up from its students.

      --
      I don't expect morality, equality, consistency, or justice from the law. I expect only legality.
    26. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      The authorities recommended counciling...."authorities were recommending that he and his parents get counseling"

      Probably because...."both the student and his parents were extremely upset. "He was very shaken by the whole situation, as were his parents," Luque said."

      Cops and firefighters see traumatised people on a daily basis, I would assume their recommendation is sound advise.

      I don't blame the cops at all, they must act as if the threat is real until they can determine otherwise, false alarms are much more common than real bombs but they cannot simply assume someone is crying wolf. Why (after talking to the kid) the authorities evacuated the school and went to the kids home is a total mystery. It would appear that by the time the cops arrived the kid was so scared and confused that he was not making a great deal of sense.

      Why the principal jumped on the conclusion mat is a total mystery. If he thought it was a bomb when he first saw it but allowed the kids to continue playing with it while he called the cops then the whole sorry story can be explained by his monumental cowardice.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    27. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by coolgeek · · Score: 2, Informative

      You could share your thoughts with them

      --

      cat /dev/null >sig
    28. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      From TFA I can't see the principals actions as being anything but cowardice. Reading betwen the lines it would appear he didn't attempt to investigate the device but rather left the kids playing with it and ran off to call the cops.

      I can certainly see the cops side of it, they cannot afford to assume the principal is crying wolf and they don't appear to have had the device at hand since they had to send a robot in to examine it.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    29. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by anwaya · · Score: 1
      At the risk of being redundant, since this has been posted at least twice in the thread already, Millennial Tech Middle School's policy statement is published, short, and fairly clear.

      You're invited to find any part of the policy that the student could have violated in any way with their motion detector project.

    30. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who works in education, I think this isn't so much malicious as it is ignorance. The most shocking thing I've learned is that, moreso than your typical workplace, people in education are incapable of putting together and communicating a logical thought process -- they follow their gut.

      So, instead of showing logically that a hypothetical student's behavior is disrupting class, with data to back it up, educators write rules that say they can punish for whatever they feel like punishing for.

      I think you can see evidence of this in some studies about teachers and math skills. Logic-based thought processes are closely related to math understanding. Teachers, as a whole, have been shown to have much lower comfort with math and are much more likely to actually be math-phobic, even in their adult life. I would risk a guess that they're also more likely to be logic-phobic, too. The idea of having to explain their reasoning is terrifying, which means we see unnecessarily open-ended rules...and explains lots of other widespread problems in American public schools.

    31. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by Kozz · · Score: 1

      Back in middle school, I made a "Freddy" glove. I took one of my dad's jersey cotton gardening gloves and cut slits in the fingertips. Then I used tin-snips to cut long, flat (and admittedly somewhat jagged) aluminum strips. One end was cut to a point, the other was bent in a "T" configuration. Pointy part fed through the glove. Looked pretty cool, esp if you were a 7th grader.

      I believe it was confiscated by a teacher or bus driver, but I was never written up, mom never got a phone call, nothing. Just imagine the hell I'd go through today. Expulsion!

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    32. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      There's no motion sensor in a Claymore. Now, granted, you can obtain some interesting results by connecting a motion sensor and a Claymore together...

      BTW, did you know that the guy who designed the Claymore was named MacLeod? There can be only one!

    33. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who has struggled with math all his life, I find the math logic connection troubling. Not because I disagree with it, but because the conclusions drawn are often that if someone is unable to grasp certain mathematical concepts (like myself) then errors in general logic and reasoning must also be present. You certainly need to think logically to grasp math, I don't think you need to think mathematically to grasp logic--but perhaps it helps.

      My math teachers in high school were always the ones most slavishly devoted to the school's rules and policies, no matter how absurd or stifling. The teachers who seemed to be able to think for themselves the most, questioned the authority and judgment of the administrators, were my English and history teachers.

    34. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't wonder if that's true. From the policies of TFAs technology school of 10 to 12 year olds:

      Students not abiding by these regulations will be banned from using campus computers. After signing the Network Contract, students who hack or commit any actions that may damage/alter the computer hardware/software will be subject to discipline, civil and criminal charges.

      You would be suspended, arrested and sued for damages.

    35. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      Is it odd that I find disturbing that a school for grades "6-8" would have such a strong need to forbid "Prolonged or heavy kissing" and "Fondling/inappropriate sexual contact" that it gets its own prominent section in a school policies summary?

      Here in Aus that'd be ages 11 to 13 and back then my peers and I were still getting used to the novel idea that the opposite sex didn't actually have cooties - the hormones only really kicked in around 14 and even then we didn't get carried away (at least, not most of us and certainly not in front of the teachers). Do kids in San Diego start school later? Puberty earlier? Are the adults scared of their own reflections?

    36. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by FragHARD · · Score: 1

      The counseling he will need when he finds out that local government WASTED over $200,000.00 on responding to his science project, they will counsel him to show that the government can waste as much money as needed to protect him from himself....

      --
      FragHARD or don't frag at all
    37. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by murphyje · · Score: 1

      It's the school dress policy he violated. Nothing about the Friday Presentation Day includes a bundle of plastic and wires. Perhaps if he had included duct tape, it would have been alright.

    38. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by TimSSG · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I remember my older brother bringing in an half/part shotgun into wood working class to make an new wooden stock for it. Time frame mid 70s. I would guess now days this would result in jail time. Tim S.

    39. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by murphyje · · Score: 1

      The age range is the same. Here in the good ol' US of A, such policies are common and were in place when I was in middle school 20 years ago. Of course, my first "sex ed" class was when I was in 5th grade (10-11 years old).

    40. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the kid looked arab.... Seriously, whatever the whole story, this admin was acting nuts.

    41. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      At my school, we were actually given copies of the policy to read and at least at one time to sign to verify we read it (or we gave it to our parents, I forget which). One of the more amusing sections was the section that covered the sort of weapons that weren't allowed on school grounds, including things like most firearms (explosive or otherwise propellants), incendiary devices, grenades, exploding missiles, etc. How it was worded, at the time, I was pretty certain that one could probably construct something valid under the rules which clearly went against the intent.

      Never the less, my point would be not so much that I disagree with the spirit of what you say. If I had tried to bring an effective weapon on school property, I doubt pointing out the clear legalize of the school policy would have protected me, just like I'm sure in this situation the school will warp some clear legalize to make what was done against policy. But, then, that seems to be the general rule of things when there's an outrage on when something is done and there doesn't exist a rule or law to cover it (the cyber-bullying suicide thing comes to mind). The only real solution to that is, in the long term, enough parental involvement so the person in question is fired and it's made clear that people are more interested in seeing the rules/policy/law followed and amending it as necessary (I don't think this situation requires the latter) than getting a cheap thrill with vengeance. That doesn't solve the problem, but hopefully it'll minimize it.

      Of course, given this is the internet and one is now much more likely to hear about all the worst abuses of power in schools and such, perhaps it's the outrage that is what really should be changed. Yes, abuse likely happened, but getting in a froth over this infraction of rule enforcement in some search for perfect justice might be a bit much. Calmness might be the better course.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    42. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The kid did violate their policies! He fabricated! :-)

    43. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rule #1: Students are not allowed to see the policy manual.

      Rule #2: We can make up whatever $#!+ we want in order to cover our ass.

      Rule #3: See Rule #2.

    44. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      These days, every school district I have seen publishes a student manual and various district regulations on their web site, so I don't think saying they don't let you have access to the policy manual is a fair accusation. What is fair to say is that they don't always know or follow their own policies. But then, there are currently so many conflicting federal, state, and local statutes governing schools that I honestly believe it is impossible to follow them all. If you don't like the way the public school system is run, feel free to shell out the $10,000 per year it now costs to send a child to private school. Otherwise, shut up and accept the fact the the school system is suboptimal and that the main reason for that is they have not been given the resources necessary to do the job the right way. My daughter attends school in a wealthy neighborhood in a comparatively good school district, and she is still jammed into a classroom with 26 other 3rd graders.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    45. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      They can be combined and are used in that manner, which is enough to make the statement "Claymore mines contain motion sensors" responsible journalism as per modern standards.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    46. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in fact I'm pretty sure the things we used to do during lunch break in the science and computer labs would get us suspended or arrested these days.

      Exactly. What would have happened if Woz had this done to him in middle school? Maybe he wold have been scared out of electronics altogether. This kid could have a bright future creating the tech of tomorrow, but he's being taught that sharing his passion is wrong.

    47. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by TerranFury · · Score: 1

      I think the moral of this story is that a good electronics project includes an attractive case for the finished circuit. (Which, compared to soldering things together, is always kind of hard to do.)

    48. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by ajlisows · · Score: 1

      To be fair to School Administrators, I can't imagine undertaking a project the size of developing a policy manual for what is acceptable in school. It would probably have to be several hundred pages long to cover the multitude of insane/destructive/dangerous schemes kids may come up with. That would likely require school districts to hire expensive lawyers for hours and hours. Every year new laws, new technologies, and new ideas would come into play, requiring the lawyers to be brought in again to revamp the policy. You hand the thing out to the kids and what do you think they are going to do? They are going to pour over the entire thing looking for a loophole to exploit.

      It is probably best to lay down rules of what you can do at school or bring to school. If your item isn't listed, assume you can't until you ask someone. Of course, this would work best with a competent staff that is willing to hear the kids out...which probably isn't all that common.

    49. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why you don't sign your rights away. Damn the consequences.

    50. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by EdgeCreeper · · Score: 1

      I'm also from Aus and was attracted to girls around age 11; other people must have been as well, since I can remembering playing truth or dare in scouts at primary school age, and one of the things commonly asked was "Who do you like?". I also know of one person that it didn't kick in to arount 17. It has also been mentioned here that the ages are usually from 8 - 14. Wikipedia says puberty usually begins at 10 for girls and 12 for boys completing 17-18. So it really seems to vary somewhat.

    51. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      I saw this at the university level once. I knew a student living in the dorms who applied to get a static ip address for his computer (default was DHCP) and he registered a domain name to that ip address. The admin in charge of the campus network sent him a very terse email telling the student that this was against school policy, and that he had to take it down NOW.

      The student immediately complied with the request, but then made the mistake of actually reading the school's network policies to try and see where this was prohibited. Unable to find any such policy, he wrote back to the head administrator and asked where registering a domain name to a campus ip address was forbidden.

      The admins response? Tried to get the student kicked out of the computer science program AND suspended for the rest of the year.

    52. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Once, when I was a student, I tried to get a copy of the school's policy manual. I was politely but firmly told to sit down and shut up. To be honest, I don't believe that such things even exist, or if they are they are so broadly defined as to be useless for informing behaviour.

      I did the same thing - with little more success.

      There certainly wasn't an official policy manual or anything like that and the set of rules I was able to get hold of was very brief and easy to read - and seldom bore any resemblance to anything I was likely to get in trouble for. I did on at least one occasion ask "So where's this rule written down? If it's a rule it must be written somewhere - where is it?".

      It didn't take very long to work out that there wasn't a rule book - if a teacher decided that something was against the rules it automatically was. Teachers have a tendency to publicly defend their colleagues however asinine so any teacher doing that could be fairly confident that anyone complaining to some other teacher would be assured that such a rule did exist.

    53. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What's the student supposed to get counseling for?" To cover the principal's arse, again.

      Then, why didn't they recommend that the principal's arse get counseling?

    54. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by TapeCutter · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Slashdot needs an undo button, I posted that before I RTFA and realised TFS was misleading hyperbole.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    55. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 1

      Hay at my mums school, one guy made a gun in metal work. He also shot the principal. So perhaps it wasn't such a good idea. Sorry couldn't find a link.

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
    56. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      He wasn't thinking 'inside the box' and trying to remain within the accepted norm of society. ( just shut up and be a good little citizen )

      We cant have independent thinkers coming out of school can we?

      Idiots.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    57. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1

      This was back in the days before the internet - back when schools didn't have webpages and nobody knew how to use computers even when we had them. I expected to be handed a neatly printed tome to peruse, but none was forthcoming.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    58. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by ArcCoyote · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between making a gun and making a new stock for a gun.

      For one, making a zip gun doesn't require you to bring anything in. Except maybe a few rounds. We had some idiots get busted for that at my H.S. If you have metal shop, somebody WILL get the clever idea to make a zip gun.

      Secondly, it's pretty safe to assume if someone is just making a new stock for a gun, they understand guns and don't mean to cause any harm in school.

    59. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I'm not a parent but I would almost guess thats something worth taking legal actions against the school.

      WTF is it with Americans wanting to sue each other all the time?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    60. Re:Counseling gets the school off the hook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In our lunchtime we once edited the autoexec files of the school computers with the line format c:

  5. Retarded "Educators" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And we wonder why US is behind all other nations in educating our young.

    1. Re:Retarded "Educators" by mustafap · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >And we wonder why US is behind all other nations in educating our young.

      The rest of the world knows though.

      --
      Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
  6. Administratium is dense by johngaunt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is what happens when the students are smarter than the teachers.

    --
    In the wild there are no dumb lions tigers or bears. Only humanity subsidizes the continued existence of the stupid.
    1. Re:Administratium is dense by FlyingBishop · · Score: 4, Interesting

      s/teachers/administrators/

      Sounds like the kid was showing it off at lunch and the vice principal freaked.

      Reminds me of one time in high school when we were given an assignment by our English teacher. I don't entirely remember the specifics, but we were supposed to take pictures of stuff and make a slideshow that somehow related to the book we were reading.

      So we go over to the theatre department and grab a wooden rifle prop (as in, something made out of a black broomstick with a wooden handle) and end up in an area with half the windows in the school facing us. So the school security guard comes and tells us he could have justified shooting us, and tells us to get back inside.

    2. Re:Administratium is dense by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So the school security guard comes and tells us he could have justified shooting us, and tells us to get back inside.

      They armed the school security guard? That's fucked up right there all by itself. The chance of a school guard actually needing to use a weapon is going to be vanishingly small - certainly much smaller than the chance of accidentally shooting someone.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:Administratium is dense by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      The odds of a trained professional accidentally discharging a weapon are plainly less than the odds of a single student bringing a weapon to school in a school of 1400 students.

      Especially in many regions of the United States, for example mine.

    4. Re:Administratium is dense by xous · · Score: 1

      Umm... We are talking about "security guards" which are basically high school drop-outs that flunked police academy.

      I don't see any mention of trained professionals.

    5. Re:Administratium is dense by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      The odds of a trained professional accidentally discharging a weapon are plainly less than the odds of a single student bringing a weapon to school in a school of 1400 students.

      Who said anything about a trained professional? Security guards, school or otherwise, are far from it. Hell, even most cops are not particularly well trained - ok, maybe they were trained at the academy but so few ever bother to maintain their training afterwards - a security guard is going to have the barest minimum training necessary because they don't get paid squat.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    6. Re:Administratium is dense by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      I've lost respect for most principals. I can't remember any that were seemingly interested or engaged with students save for disciplinary action. Most did not want to even speak with students. Their job, in part, should be to make the learning environment encouraging to students instead of instilling fear and distrust. This is certainly the opposite of what I found with the two post-secondary institutions I graduated from.

      A relative was a HS principal. I acknowledge he happens to have strong opinions and is perhaps a bit arrogant. But, when we last met a few years ago when I was 28, he still spoke to me as a mere child (it is not just because of a familial relationship). He similarly speaks to his kids the same way even though I am much more responsible.

      I've met some of the other principles that are his colleagues and even as a smart, trouble-free teenager, I was always spoken down to.

      This incident reminds me of the science fair Dihydrogen Monoxide scare: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dihydrogen_monoxide_hoax

    7. Re:Administratium is dense by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      My high school usually had at least one cop assigned. Can't remember if he was the one that came down on us.

    8. Re:Administratium is dense by Giltron · · Score: 1
      And what happens when the parents are bigger sheep than the students.

      http://www.greatschools.org/school/parentReviews.page?id=24725&state=CA

      This school does not deserve the rating it gets.

    9. Re:Administratium is dense by kilodelta · · Score: 1

      Precisely. There seems to be a general fear of electronic devices in the past few years. Recall the Mooninite scare in Boston.

      Yet I can pack my Arduino, wire kit, and components in my backpack and send it through a TSA x-ray and nobody says BOO about it. Schools are getting out of control lately. It all started with the zero tolerance bullshit.

    10. Re:Administratium is dense by PMuse · · Score: 1

      No, this is something that happens once in a while when a student turns out to be smarter than teachers expect students to be. What's sad is that stupidity makes the 5:30PM news, while the thousands of good calls routinely made by other administrators and teachers are never reported.

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    11. Re:Administratium is dense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When?

      Hardly when.

      Most of the time. Every freaking day.

      This is what happens every day, because the students are usually smarter than the teachers, every day.

    12. Re:Administratium is dense by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      The chance of a school guard actually needing to use a weapon is going to be vanishingly small

      Haven't been following the news much in the last 40 years, have we?

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    13. Re:Administratium is dense by ajlisows · · Score: 1

      Back when I was in school, we had a "security guard" that was a complete idiot. I stayed after school maybe 30 minutes late to work on an independent study Biology project. As we were leaving, he harassed us making all sorts of threats because he "knew" we had stayed late to "monkey around or steal stuff". Eventually we just left.

      We get out to the parking lot and my friend's car window was smashed, stereo swiped, and steering column ripped apart as if someone was trying to hotwire the car. We started heading back into the school to call the police. We were stopped by the same security guard who greeted us with "The security of these grounds is under my control and you kids will not be entering the school AFTER HOURS to cause mayhem." We tried explaining the situation to him and asked him to come look at our problem but he told us "Haha, You think I am going to fall for that trick? I wasn't born yesterday!" (??WTF??) At that point I became agitated and started swearing at him and telling him we wouldn't be in this situation if he was as fucking vigilant as he claimed and watched the god damned parking lot. We had to leave and walk 9 blocks to someone's house we knew, use the phone to call the cops and a friend that knew something about cars. The police filed their report, our friend put the ignition back together.

      The next day, I was served a day of in school suspension for lipping off to the security guard, even after explaining the situation to the principal. He also didn't believe me. For lying I was asked to go out in the parking lot and pick up a pile of shattered glass that the vigilant security guard had discovered that morning.(Banged head on desk)

    14. Re:Administratium is dense by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      The odds of a trained professional accidentally discharging a weapon

      We left 'trained professional' way behind when said professional basically threatened to plug a couple of unarmed kids.

    15. Re:Administratium is dense by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      For lying I was asked to go out in the parking lot and pick up a pile of shattered glass that the vigilant security guard had discovered that morning.(Banged head on desk)

      Condolences. Worst I ever got was being 'volunteered' to spend my Friday lunch hours transcribing text from faxes into a staff computer, and then accused of vandalizing said computer one Monday. Why? They knew I'd used it on Friday. The fact that a staff member had used it the Friday afternoon after I did was irrelevant, as were the assorted weekend things happening in the building. I was the last kid known to be near it, so I was the first and only suspect.

    16. Re:Administratium is dense by oh2 · · Score: 1

      The fucked up part is that your School has a need for a Security Guard.

      --

      Now the world has gone to bed, Darkness won't engulf my head, I can see by infra-red, How I hate the night.

    17. Re:Administratium is dense by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Haven't been following the news much in the last 40 years, have we?

      Apparently not. Just what news have I been missing for the last 40 years?

      Or are you of a mind that simply because a child brings a weapon to school the appropriate response is to shoot them?

      Or perhaps you are yet another innumerate who believes that we get a Columbine every other week?

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    18. Re:Administratium is dense by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      No, this is what happens when the school administration is less intelligent then the students and has lost all common sense.

      I didn't see a *teacher* involved here. Lets lay the blame where it deserves to be.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    19. Re:Administratium is dense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what happens when the students are smarter than the teachers.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ender%27s_Shadow

    20. Re:Administratium is dense by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      They armed the school security guard? That's fucked up right there all by itself.

      He was just upholding his constitutional right to bear arms.
      And if all the kids were armed too, they wouldn't have needed a prop, they could have used their own weapons.
      And, in any case, an armed school is a polite school.
      And if one of the kids had been shot, their parents could have sued the school for future loss of earnings of their little genius.
      Etc.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  7. Lesson Learned by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't do anything to attract attention to yourself ever.

    1. Re:Lesson Learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't do anything to attract attention to yourself ever.

      Like posting on slashdot

    2. Re:Lesson Learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he can maintain the reputation, the kid's going to get all the girls. Who can get the whole school evacuated and get away with it?

    3. Re:Lesson Learned by Narpak · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't do anything to attract attention to yourself ever.

      Anyone actively trying not to attract attention must be a terrorist!

    4. Re:Lesson Learned by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1

      Your comment has been noted and filed, citizen.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    5. Re:Lesson Learned by lordholm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I did that when I was 8, I ignored the order in the math-book saying that "If you cannot compute the numbers put an x in the answer box", apparently that was someway of saying that "if the result of a - b is negative put an x in the answer box". I completely ignored the order from the math book and wrote down the actual answers to the question, only to find out that this offence resulted in a teacher yelling so high, screaming that I was a bad child because I refused to follow the instructions, that even the pupils in the next class room heard it. Granted, this happened in EU around 20 years ago, but in any case, it seems that times have not changed, only the means in which you suppress smart students.

      --
      "Civis Europaeus sum!"
    6. Re:Lesson Learned by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      I used to walk around with my pants down and nobody said a thing. I still walk around with my pants down but now they're lady's pants. You should see how the people laugh and stare.

    7. Re:Lesson Learned by speaktruth · · Score: 1

      I think that this article http://www.cantrip.org/gatto.html is pertinent.

    8. Re:Lesson Learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So anyone attracting attention is a bomber... anyone not attracting attention is a terrorist?

    9. Re:Lesson Learned by shish · · Score: 1

      I had pretty much the same thing, being told that it is impossible to subtract a large number from a small one; after pointing out how it was possible, I was taken to one side and told I was far enough ahead that I could spend the class time doing my own things. That moment in preschool was possibly the highlight of my education, since then the curriculum has pretty much been treated as the definition of truth :-(

      --
      I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
    10. Re:Lesson Learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard him speak at a small conference (~40 people) once. Great speaker. He spoke for 3-4 hrs but I could have listened to him speak for twice that.

    11. Re:Lesson Learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to a generation weaned on Twitter, Facebook, and MySpace.

    12. Re:Lesson Learned by pax+humana · · Score: 1

      The nail that sticks out will get hit. (deru kugi wa utareru) - Japanese proverb

  8. Apparently, not so much by studog-slashdot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The school, which has about 440 students in grades 6 to 8 and emphasizes technology skills, was initially put on lockdown while authorities responded.

    ...Stu

    1. Re:Apparently, not so much by studog-slashdot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The student violated school policies, but there was no criminal intent, Luque said.

      The policies emphasizing technology? Or the policies forbidding technology?

      The student will not be prosecuted, but authorities were recommending that he and his parents get counseling, the spokesman said.

      It is clear it is not the student that requires counselling.

      ...Stu

    2. Re:Apparently, not so much by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      The school, which has about 440 students in grades 6 to 8 and emphasizes technology skills, was initially put on lockdown while authorities responded.

      ...Stu

      Apparently they don't emphasise soldering skills. Thats the kind of thing which will be done in China in the future.

    3. Re:Apparently, not so much by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > Apparently they don't emphasise soldering skills.

      Certainly not! Heavens! The children could burn themselves! Children must never be allowed to handle dangerous tools! (i.e., any tools at all)

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    4. Re:Apparently, not so much by x_IamSpartacus_x · · Score: 1

      Students were evacuated from Millennial Tech Magnet Middle School in the Chollas View neighborhood Friday afternoon after an 11-year-old student brought a personal science project that he had been making at home to school, authorities said.

      I am thinking that TFA kinda duped Slashdot into thinking this was a school sanctioned project. TFA says the student had been making this thing in his garage and was just showing it to his friends when the VP saw it and said it looks dangerous. This is DEFINITELY an overreaction but it was not a school sanctioned project that the VP saw and flipped out about. This kid brought a crazy lookin thing into school without warning any administrators they flipped. The policy he violated was probably against bringing electronic things like that into school without approval. As another poster noted below it looks like TFA is saying the kid needs counseling because he was so shaken up by the event NOT because he did something wrong.

    5. Re:Apparently, not so much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey just FYI, signing your posts on a forum that displays your username and linked profile in every post by default makes you look like a blithering idiot. Just a heads up.

    6. Re:Apparently, not so much by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I like how they put the school in lockdown. Hey, there might be a bomb in the school! Quick, lock all the doors!

    7. Re:Apparently, not so much by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      Don't be daft - who do you think's going to be their pool of cheap slave labour?

    8. Re:Apparently, not so much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The school policies are on there website, and it looks like the student did not violate any of them. I think they are making up laws as and when they see fit.

    9. Re:Apparently, not so much by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      In the US, it seems that the only technology skill worth having these days is how to write a patent. Perhaps they don't want these children to be distracted by wires and electronic components.

    10. Re:Apparently, not so much by deniable · · Score: 1

      Especially since the vice principal was holding the 'bomb.' Walk it out the back behind some concrete, block off the area, let the bomb guys do their thing.

    11. Re:Apparently, not so much by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Indeed, 'tis a common signature of a tool.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    12. Re:Apparently, not so much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUU

    13. Re:Apparently, not so much by anyGould · · Score: 1

      Students were evacuated from Millennial Tech Magnet Middle School in the Chollas View neighborhood Friday afternoon after an 11-year-old student brought a personal science project that he had been making at home to school, authorities said.

      I am thinking that TFA kinda duped Slashdot into thinking this was a school sanctioned project. TFA says the student had been making this thing in his garage and was just showing it to his friends when the VP saw it and said it looks dangerous. This is DEFINITELY an overreaction but it was not a school sanctioned project that the VP saw and flipped out about. This kid brought a crazy lookin thing into school without warning any administrators they flipped. The policy he violated was probably against bringing electronic things like that into school without approval. As another poster noted below it looks like TFA is saying the kid needs counseling because he was so shaken up by the event NOT because he did something wrong.

      Weird: a kid who's actually studying on his own time, and the school punishes him for it. (And yes, calling the bomb squad counts as "punishment", as in "negative reinforcement")

      Also, without knowing which "authority" wants them to get counseling, it's hard to say what the motivation is. If it's the school, I'd call it a total CYA move (let's them "prove" the kid had issues). If it's the cops/fire department, more likely it's due to trauma.

  9. Call themselves teachers? by nil_orally · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The real question is why are we letting people this stupid in charge of educating our children?

    1. Re:Call themselves teachers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cause the general population is just as stupid, perhaps?

    2. Re:Call themselves teachers? by 15Bit · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because the better ones cost more than you are willing to pay.

    3. Re:Call themselves teachers? by v1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The more an expert you are in one area, the lower the odds that you are an expert in an unrelated area.

      School superintendents are (for the most part) some of the most technologically inept people in the building. They're schooled to manage budgets, staff, student problems, parents, PTAs, school boards, etc, not be geeks. In high school in speech class we were broken into groups to compose and film skits. We had to submit our story before we started recording. The finale' of our skit was a bomb failing to be diffused and blowing up something.

      Me being the geek in the group, I was propmaster for the bomb. And I did a pretty good job I think. Looked like a substantial brick of C4 with attached detonator and timer. The wire was the stereotypical brightly colored curly wires, and the timer was displaying like a clock. The skit went off very well, but the prop was misplaced after the skit, though we found it shortly later and thought nothing of it. I only found out some years later where it spent those 10 minutes.

      Attached to a locker beside the main office. A certain student "planted" it, and just as he was walking away, the vice principal walked out of the office. To save from being caught, he shouted "omg a bomb!" and ran. I guess the VP's face turned stone white and he sprinted back into the office. Thinking smartly, the kid spun around and grabbed the prop and returned it to our class room. I'm assuming the VP came back out of the office with the rest of the staff (evacuating?) and found no bomb and was left with some egg on his face, but it could have EASILY gotten the school evacuated now that we look back on it. And this was 19 yrs ago. Just try to imagine the insanity that would have ensued today? I'm sure it would have involved the bomb squad and a small detonation in the parking lot. But I can't blame the VP for not realizing it was a joke, for him everything was stacked pretty well against him. But a gatorade bottle with a photosensor? really?

      Part of the problem here is that an IED can be extremely difficult to identify. Odds are if it looks like a bomb to the layman, it's probably a prop.

      That being said, the last school I worked at, the principal was one of the most tech savvy people in the building short of me, so you can't take anything for granted.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    4. Re:Call themselves teachers? by santax · · Score: 1

      I would have modded you up, but since the post already is at 5 insightful and I in fact don't have any modding points, you will have to do with this virtual pat on the shoulder. *pats*

    5. Re:Call themselves teachers? by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1

      See now, if you were smart you could have planted the bomb in the school, filmed it when they detonated it later, and used the footage for your film skit...

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    6. Re:Call themselves teachers? by spasm · · Score: 1

      Because a high school teacher makes an average of around $55k in San Diego (http://preview.tinyurl.com/18r), and bright people who've gone to the effort of becoming educated to the minimum level needed to be an effective high school teacher tend to have other options which pay better. Or tend to leave teaching after a couple of years if they start as one.

    7. Re:Call themselves teachers? by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      Part of the problem here is that an IED can be extremely difficult to identify. Odds are if it looks like a bomb to the layman, it's probably a prop.

      Unless the layman has somehow managed never to have seen an episode of "24", I can assure you that the layman knows what a bomb looks like.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    8. Re:Call themselves teachers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teachers' Unions. Seriously, give them a google and discover just how hard it is to fire a teacher/administrator.

    9. Re:Call themselves teachers? by Kenoli · · Score: 1

      But I can't blame the VP for not realizing it was a joke

      A joke? It's not like the kid was pretending it was a bomb. The VP apparently just pulled that idea out of his ass, and instead of doing something reasonable like asking him what it was, he went bananas and starting calling authorities.

    10. Re:Call themselves teachers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Part of the problem here is that an IED can be extremely difficult to identify.

      Yes, but this is a 11-year old's science project in San Diego, not Baghdad.

    11. Re:Call themselves teachers? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Those who can't, teach. Those who can't teach, administrate.

    12. Re:Call themselves teachers? by butlerm · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Hardly. The public school system is not a free market, where for more money you can attract higher levels of talent (and sanity). Paying more means paying the same people higher salaries, depending not on demonstrated ability, but rather the number of years they have been in the system. That is what the union system is all about - not talent, but rather seniority. The whole idea is that teachers (or assembly line workers or whoever) are interchangeable cogs in a wheel, not real individuals with different talents and abilities deserving of individual treatment.

      If we want the school system to improve, we should quit running it like the drivers license division (and vice versa).

    13. Re:Call themselves teachers? by 5pp000 · · Score: 1

      Particularly the amount we're willing to pay here in California. It never ceases to astound me that the state that is home to the technology capital of the world is so blind to the importance of educating the next generation. It's just unfathomable.

      --
      Your god may be dead, but mine aren't!
    14. Re:Call themselves teachers? by ravenshrike · · Score: 0, Troll

      Because not only are 99.999% of those who go after the job of high school principal power hungry monsters, but they are the utterly inept power hungry monsters, else they they would have a different job with more status. Basically, most principals are like Gilbert Gottfried in Problem Child 2

    15. Re:Call themselves teachers? by Locke2005 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Odds are if it looks like a bomb to the layman, it's probably a prop. Note to laymen: if it's got a huge red digital display counting down the seconds until it goes "boom", just like every bomb you ever seen in a move or television show, then it almost certainly IS NOT a bomb. Seriously -- what terrorist that actually wanted to blow shit up would bother to wire up a huge, conspicuous countdown timer?

      My daughter's school has a policy against bringing toys to school; that is probably the policy this kid violated. He almost certainly is not the one that needs counseling.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    16. Re:Call themselves teachers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The more an expert you are in one area, the lower the odds that you are an expert in an unrelated area.

      Speak for yourself!

      (Also, I'm certain that at least half of the readership disagrees with your statement, and can likewise provide more-than-adequate supporting evidence.)

    17. Re:Call themselves teachers? by teg · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hardly. The public school system is not a free market, where for more money you can attract higher levels of talent (and sanity). Paying more means paying the same people higher salaries, depending not on demonstrated ability, but rather the number of years they have been in the system.

      If the salary level in the schools is lowered to minimum wage, there wouldn't be any qualified teachers left. If you agree on that, we agree that the salary level does indeed have an effect. Now, I agree that significantly increasing salary wouldn't have as an immediate effect as decreasing it - there is a significant lag when improving conditions. However, increased pay would retain many of the good teachers who move away from teaching, and make teaching a more attractive career for students looking at different career paths. Thus, the average would slowly improve.

      Another problem is, what is a good teacher? A teacher in the best areas of Silicon Valley has a very different set of pupils and parents than a teacher in a poor inner city district somewhere - I expect the results on standardized tests would be very different, even if the latter teacher knew his subjects better and was better at motivating and coaching. I even expect that the skill sets needed would be very different.

    18. Re:Call themselves teachers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Odds are if it looks like a bomb to the layman, it's probably a prop.

      Part of the problem is the viewer. People take for granted what they see in the movies. James Bond or 24 or Mission Impossible taught them what a bomb "should" look like -and like your prop, that always involves some dramatic timer and colorful coils of wire and an obvious explosive.

      As you note, real bombs often do not look anything like that. Reality doesn't need to imitate Hollywood for effect. Real bombs just need to go boom, not have colorful wires and a nifty timer. Real explosions don't look like big fireballs of gasoline either.

      The result of this teaching by movie is that people don't know a real bomb when they see it, they panic over science projects, and when actual crimes happen or some sort of bad event happens, the first reaction from people is often "I thought someone was filming a movie!" despite the fact that most of them have never seen a movie being filmed and ignore the lack of cameras or actors or anything that looks like it's part of a movie set.

      When the first alien appears, people will assume it's a movie being filmed, right up until the second the alien eats them.

      When the next nuclear weapon is detonated in a city (which will happen, someday), or when WW 3 starts, those seeing the missile trails or distant explosions will think it's a movie being filmed, up until they are vaporized.

    19. Re:Call themselves teachers? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Seriously -- what terrorist that actually wanted to blow shit up would bother to wire up a huge, conspicuous countdown timer?

      Maybe they think it might be a good psychological weapon against bomb disposal operators?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    20. Re:Call themselves teachers? by JobyOne · · Score: 1

      Sure it might mean paying the same people more, for a while. Eventually those people will retire, and they will need to be replaced at the bottom.

      If we increase the pay scale we'll get more talented people, because they'll be less likely to say "well, I want to teach, but I'd rather make quadruple the money somewhere else."

      Are you also the type who believes that the mythical "free market" also requires us to pay exorbitant salaries to executives of failing banks...because that's how we attract the top talent? If so please reevaluate your stance on almost everything, you might be an idiot.

      --
      Porquoi?
    21. Re:Call themselves teachers? by JobyOne · · Score: 1

      You know what? You're probably right. The best way to attract talent for education is definitely to keep paying them like they're cleaning toilets.

      If we're going to say "the children are our future" and constantly scream "think of the children" let's put our money where our mouth is, and try actually funding things that help our children. I assure you higher wages won't make things worse, and they'll cost roughly as much as a couple new, better-than-our-already-the-best airplanes.

      Moron.

      --
      Porquoi?
    22. Re:Call themselves teachers? by butlerm · · Score: 1

      That is no doubt the best way to engage in productive conversation - imagine what your interlocutor believes and call him names. No doubt I am preoccupied from morning to midnight with the lunatic operations of a deranged mind. When I am not plotting to steal children's lollipops and swindle their parents out of their life savings, of course.

  10. Are we getting the whole story here? by 91degrees · · Score: 4, Funny

    I mean, did anyone, for example, ask the kid what the device was and perhaps he said "It's a bomb! I'm going to blow myself and all of you up as a sacrifice for the great god Satan!" because had he said that, I'd suggest most of the rest of the article makes sense.

    1. Re:Are we getting the whole story here? by Arccot · · Score: 1

      I have to agree. At this age, the teacher helps or at the very least knows about a project before it shows up at any science fair. If that was the case this time, the evacuation probably would not have occurred.

      School policies generally are reasonable, despite what most of the people here seem to believe. If the student did violate school policies, there's probably something he did that really wasn't a smart idea.

      And to all the Slashdotters with the knee-jerk reactions against the school administrator in this case: When a story sounds ridiculous or even just unreasonable, perhaps you should question the story you're hearing? Before calliing others morons or claiming they're fearful sheep. What does that say about your independent thinking?

    2. Re:Are we getting the whole story here? by letsief · · Score: 2, Insightful

      School policies are usually pretty benign. Most of the time there's nothing wrong with the language of a policy per se, but they are often quite vague. And 99% of the time it's fine that a given policy is vague, since reasonable people are perfectly capable of looking at a situation and coming up with a reasonable response (and yes, school administrators are usually reasonable people).

      But, when people get put on the defensive, they'll often try to justify their actions. Vaguely written policies are very easy to point to as justification. So, while I basically agree that school policies are generally reasonable, I'm far less inclined to say a student necessarily did something wrong just because he violated a policy. It's certainly possible that we're not getting the whole story here, but it seems like what we do know from the article points to authorities attempting to justify their actions. The article said the student was "very cooperative" with authorities, which to me suggests he didn't say anything like "It's a bomb!", or that he talked back to the vice principal or authorities.

      And, for what it's worth, I don't think the response to the device was entirely unreasonable. I just think the vice principal and authorities should feel a little more embarrassed given what had actually happened.

    3. Re:Are we getting the whole story here? by Tyren · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      My first assumption is that the 'policy' he violated is a rule against weapon lookalikes (aka, a fake bomb). Schools are crazy about 'zero tolerance' that common sense doesn't apply. I bet they think that because someone was able to mistake it for a bomb, it automatically becomes a lookalike, regardless of the actual design intent.

      Unfortunately, it seems to be difficult to find out what the schools weapons policy actually is. Their stated policies don't list anything about their weapons policy, and their "Student Handbook" apparently was uploaded by someone who doesn't understand how to copy an attachment from an email....

    4. Re:Are we getting the whole story here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have not seen a school policy document yet that sounded anywhere near reasonable. I have been reading several of the ones available online a year ago or so, from school districts all around the U.S. I'd say that 3/4 of them weren't worth the paper you'd ordinarily print them on. You cannot run a school system, much less its policies, based on decisions of a committee whose makeup is decided upon by morons. Unfortunately, it shows. Right now my daughter goes to kindergarten and all I can tell you is that I wish she went to school in old Poland in the 80s. In spite of it being behind the iron curtain, the policies were generally saner. We were periodically reminded that had we ever come across a grenade or other munitions that would sometimes get digged up, we were not to mess with them lest we lose a limb, an eye or two, or our lives. That actually made sense. The school administrator in this instance had just wasted taxpayers a lot of money. Even if it was a bomb, and someone would lose a life due to its detonation, getting all terrorized because of it is stupid. Such events are so rare that instituting a nationwide policy of being scared shitless of anything that we don't understand is just beyond me.

      I hold school administrators in the U.S. in contempt, at best.

  11. What if it was really a bomb? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Let us say it was really bomb. Then the very same media would be all over the school officials, "What? There was this bottle! with wires inside! And electronics! And the clueless vice principal dismissed it as harmless. When is he going to learn that Al Queda is constantly probing our defenses. The terrorists know every trick in the book and know that the best way to smuggle a bomb into a school is to disguise it as a science project. Now the bomb has killed 200 school children. Some heads better roll, or else!". And there is always a steady supply of talking head Monday-morning-quarterbacking security experts lecturing us on how to handle it and how everything is serious and there is a terrorist hiding behind every tree and every garbage can has a bomb in it.

    Yes, in a saner world, where most parties are responsible this would not have been been blown this big. But with the vitiated atmosphere and media constantly looking for flames to fan, the school officials decided, "OK either way they are going to get me. At least let me take the path where I look ridiculous but keep my job."

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:What if it was really a bomb? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bomb and NotBomb are not equally likely possibilities.

      So you propose that NoReaction is inferior because you're screwed if it was a bomb, while Reaction is inferior because its safe either way. I think you're wrong, NoReaction+Bomb is the worst outcome, yes, but its astonishingly unlikely. Getting hit by lightning in your office likely. OTOH, Reaction+NotBomb is still somewhat harmful to you (if nothing else the kids family and their friends think you are a monster) and NotBomb is very very likely.

      On average having a the more tempered reaction is the best outcome. Sadly, people are stupid.

    2. Re:What if it was really a bomb? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a school administrator, aren't you.

    3. Re:What if it was really a bomb? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is an 11 year old at a Tech Magnet Middle School in SD. the SD located in the same state as silicon valley. surely the staff at such a school can recognize a fucking IED when they see it. the best way to smuggle a fucking bomb into a school is using the janitor, not a kid on a science fair project which is shown to every fucking person at the school.

    4. Re:What if it was really a bomb? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      Yes, you are correct in saying that noreaction+bomb is exceedingly unlikely. But the 24hour news channels run such exceedingly unlikely events repeatedly on a loop and make us see it again and again and again. Our human brain has not evolved to handle such exposure to repeated graphic imagery of mayhem. The way brain evolved to remember collective traumatic events are by listening to the old sage, the memory keeper of the tribe reciting it over camp fire. Suddenly we are overloading the brains with stunningly graphic visual imagery of mayhem and destruction by terrorists in saturation coverage. Each exposure to the graphic image strengthens to memory of that connection and eventually people think it is more probable than it really is.

      What kind of people end up as school vice principals? People who are extremely risk averse who choose career path where safety and job security is preferred. These are not the kind of people who would make a risky move in their life. This is the best you can expect from people who make such career choice.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    5. Re:What if it was really a bomb? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "OK either way they are going to get me. At least let me take the path where I look ridiculous but keep my job."

      That is the problem.... that is why this school VP should be fired.

      There has to be consequences... Persons such as this school vice principle should be technically literate enough to look at such a thing and evaluate the danger.... The Bar MUST be raised.... how long before it is illegal to open electronic devices ( they are filled with electronic components and wires). How long before possessing such things is considered on par with shouting fire in a theatre?

    6. Re:What if it was really a bomb? by gurps_npc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Everything you said makes sense ... if the moron did not suggest the kid seek counseling. Once you realize that YOU over-reacted, the correct action is to accept the fact that YOU acted like a fool. It is not to shift blame to the kid.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    7. Re:What if it was really a bomb? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      san diego you fuckwit.

    8. Re:What if it was really a bomb? by Icarium · · Score: 0, Troll

      Where does South Dakota come into this story? San Diego on the other hand...

    9. Re:What if it was really a bomb? by letsief · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's why I think people shouldn't criticize the vice principal too much for calling authorities to look into this. He wouldn't have done so unless he thought there was a reasonable chance that this thing was a bomb. Maybe he should have known better, but he didn't, and I'm not going to fault him for erring on the side of caution. But, I am troubled that the school and authorities seem to be blaming the kid and parents for this, like they should have known better than to bring a geeky home project to a *technology magnet school*. I would consider this a non-story if the school, vice principal, and authorities showed a little embarrassment over this situation, but they really seem to think this family did something horribly wrong.

    10. Re:What if it was really a bomb? by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      I must agree with you. It's unfortunate that the kid had to go through this, but the reality is that like you said, had it ACTUALLY have been a bomb, Slashdot as a collective whole would have been roasting this guy for how incompetent he was for seeing a bottle with wires and just dismissing it as normal business.

      Reality is - if you're going to bring something like that to school - tell your teacher first. It's all about context. If his science fair project (same one) would have showed up on the day of the Science fair when people were expecting it, I'd wager nobody would have cared.

      That's the problem with a precautionary measure though. The scenarios are: the principal does nothing and it isn't a bomb. The principal calls in the police and it is a bomb. The principal calls in the police and it isn't, and the principal does nothing and it is a bomb. Half of the those actions are going to result in criticism, and that half are linked to opposite choices for the principal. It's a no-win situation for him.

      I will admit though, things have definitely changed since I was a kid. I remember kids bringing guns to school (real, actual guns) at least twice. The gun was confiscated (returned to the parents) and the kid was suspended for 10 days. That's it. No media attention, and overall nobody really reacted much. Heck in high school it wasn't uncommon at all to go out and see a student's pickup with a gun rack + a gun or two hanging on his back window. Nobody cared - and nobody ever got shot.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    11. Re:What if it was really a bomb? by calidoscope · · Score: 1
      Lessee, population of South Dakota is 812,000, population of San Diego (Sandy Eggo) is 1,150,000.

      I won't even get into SDSU vs SDSU (San Diego State Univ. vs. South Dakota State Univ.).

      --
      A Shadeless room is a brighter room.
    12. Re:What if it was really a bomb? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In that case, the solution is obvious. Take away that job security. Make an example of some of the more prominent idiots, and force the rest to sit up and start doing a good job, instead of trundling along in the knowledge that mediocrity never got anyone fired.

    13. Re:What if it was really a bomb? by isomer1 · · Score: 1

      Thank you for standing up and saying this. Most of this page is filled with random 'THE VICE PRINCIPLE IS THE SUXXORZ RAWR!' rants which have sadly spilled on to the local news page (many of the comments on that page are in fact copied verbatim here on slashdot).

      The description for the 'project' is quite vague, though it is described as a motion detector. I am under the impression that this is a inquisitive child's attempt at making a 'motion detector' the same way he might make a fire truck out of a cardboard box. People keep saying how the vice-principle should have known better, but there are certainly 11 year-olds that are capable of constructing explosives. With the obvious exception of things-that-do-nothing, explosives are probably the easiest project to make, and its highly plausible that amongst the student population of a tech school that you'd find students capable of making such a project.

      For all the people slamming the vice-principle let me pose the following mental experiment: (1) imagine a gatorade bottle with random wire and IC chips glued to the surface (2) imagine an actual explosive device constructed by an 11-year old. If those objects look drastically different in your mind then you've been watching too much television. A high-school buddy of mine does bomb disposal for a PD down in Georgia and he has plenty of stories about real bombs that look like a someone spun a pitchfork in the bargain bin at a local electronics shop and covered the thing in hot glue.

      Yes it sounds like things got out of hand, yes the school should probably plan and highly publicize how such an event will be handled in the future, but good grief stop screaming at people that had make a judgment call with the possible danger to several hundred students on the line.

    14. Re:What if it was really a bomb? by westlake · · Score: 1, Troll

      NoReaction+Bomb is the worst outcome, yes, but its astonishingly unlikely. Getting hit by lightning in your office likely.

      Maybe. Maybe not.

      A 13-year-old elementary school student had "second thoughts" that stopped him from setting off pipe bombs in his Courtice school. The bomb squad examined explosives found in the boy's home and said they would have caused significant damage. [They] wouldn't say how many explosive devices -- which he apparently learned how to make from the Internet -- were seized. 'Second thoughts' halt school bomb plot [Jan 14]

      This piece is a little dated - but still suggestive:

      Data on bomb incidents (any event in which an actual bomb or bomb look-alike is involved) and bomb threats (any event in which a bomb threat is communicated that may or may not involve an actual bomb or bomb look-alike) are limited. The FBI reports that close to 5 percent of bombing incidents in the United States in 1999 were targeted at schools. It is unknown what portion of these incidents involved threats. For the period January 1990 to February 28, 2002 the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) recorded 1,055 incidents of bombs being placed in school premises. Again, we do not know what proportion of these incidents involved threats. For the most part, however, it is probably reasonable to conclude that bomb incidents involving real bombs in schools are relatively rare, though they have been with us for quite some time. Furthermore, relatively few bomb explosions are preceded by a warning or threat to officials. Of the 1,055 bomb incidents in schools reported by ATF, only 14 were accompanied by a warning to school or other authorities.


      The first known school bombing occurred in May 1927 in Bath, Michigan. A local farmer blew up the school, killing 38 pupils, six adults and seriously injuring 40 other students.
      The Problem of Bomb Threats in Schools

    15. Re:What if it was really a bomb? by maxume · · Score: 1

      I prefer area as a judgment of placeness.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    16. Re:What if it was really a bomb? by Lorens · · Score: 1

      I won't even get into SDSU vs SDSU (San Diego State Univ. vs. South Dakota State Univ.).

      Huh? Isn't it called UCSD (University of California, San Diego)? Like UCLA, UCSF?

      Oh. There actually exists a "San Diego State University", in San Diego, California, abbreviated SDSU. It is not the same as UCSD (University of California, San Diego). My head hurts.

    17. Re:What if it was really a bomb? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Let us say it was really bomb."

      Why would we do that?

      If we think this can be a bomb, we must think anything can be a bomb.
      Then the terrorists would have defeated us by turning our own fear against us.

    18. Re:What if it was really a bomb? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      ata on bomb incidents (any event in which an actual bomb or bomb look-alike is involved) ...
      For the period January 1990 to February 28, 2002 the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) recorded 1,055 incidents of bombs being placed in school premises.

      Based on that first part, they are mixing together actual bombs and fake bombs in that count of 1,055 incidents. In fact, based on the described criteria, this case would probably have qualified.

      How many actual detonations do we hear about - at school or anywhere else? Like maybe 1 every couple of years? That stuff tends to get crazy-ass nationwide news coverage when it happens and I can't recall the last time I heard of such a case.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    19. Re:What if it was really a bomb? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Read it again. The counseling was recommended NOT by the administration, and was recommended in the context that the child and parents were extremely upset.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    20. Re:What if it was really a bomb? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The worst part being there is NO precedence for a school BOMBING. All the other school "terrorists" have only ever used GUNS. I say terrorists in quotations because they are merely very deeply psychologically disturbed individuals and not terrorists at all.

    21. Re:What if it was really a bomb? by westlake · · Score: 1

      How many actual detonations do we hear about - at school or anywhere else? Like maybe 1 every couple of years?

      Explosions are rare.

      But kids do strange things:

      A Pine Middle School 8th grader showed classmates spent CO2 cartridges modified to look like explosive devices on the morning bus ride to school, prompting his fellow students to alert school officials. He was showing them to kids on the bus and telling them he had made them. The young man had drilled holes in the top of the cartridges and inserted key chains which made them look like explosives to some of the youngsters Pine Middle School bomb scare turns out to be fake

      One question that never really gets answered in these stories is what a geek thinks a real bomb would look like - and how much he would be willing to risk if he had to make the call. With maybe 600 lives depending on the right answer.
       

    22. Re:What if it was really a bomb? by Donkey_Hotey · · Score: 1

      A high-school buddy of mine does bomb disposal for a PD down in Georgia and he has plenty of stories about real bombs that look like a someone spun a pitchfork in the bargain bin at a local electronics shop and covered the thing in hot glue.

      And war stories are never exaggerated...

      --
      (There is supposed to be a Sarcmark® here, but my $1.99 check hasn't cleared, yet...)
    23. Re:What if it was really a bomb? by dzfoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >> Maybe he should have known better, but he didn't, and I'm not going to fault him for erring on the side of caution.

      And therein lies the root of the problem: There is absolutely no consequence to acting, reacting, or over-reacting in an unreasonable, ignorant, or just plain stupid way.

      All actions should have consequences, even those obviously foolish ones taken with the best of intentions. This is precisely the reason why people who constantly "abuse" the 911 emergency services for--what some officials deem--trivial reasons, get police warnings or have to pay penalties for wasting everybody's time.

              -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    24. Re:What if it was really a bomb? by anyGould · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For the period January 1990 to February 28, 2002 the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) recorded 1,055 incidents of bombs being placed in school premises.

      And apparently, there are 125,000 schools in the US

      .

      So, assuming an even spread (no two "bombs" in the same school), a school has a 0.84% (less than 1 in 100) chance of being involved in a single incident over the last 12 years. Now, IIRC, US schools run on the four-year system (grades 1-4 in one school, 5-8 in another, 9-12 in the third, right?), which means that over 12 years, that's three generations of kids going through the doors - two-thirds of the student population over the time listed, even if their school was "hit", weren't a student there when it happened anyway.

      If my 8am math is working right, that gives your school a 0.281% chance of being involved in a "bomb incident" during your child's four year stay. And that's before you start removing the incidences where the bomb is an alarm clock with a few wires sticking out (the "I didn't do my homework" bomb) rather than an actual explosive of any kind.

    25. Re:What if it was really a bomb? by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

      That not what I read. "The student will not be prosecuted, but authorities were recommending that he and his parents get counseling, the spokesman said. The student violated school policies, but there was no criminal intent, Luque said." They accused the student of violating school policies in the same paragraph that they mentioned counseling. This looks like a bunch of moronic, paranoid asswipes trying to blame the kid, not a bunch of kind school administrators apologizing for over-reacting.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    26. Re:What if it was really a bomb? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      But over 12 years of school, you're back to the .84%. 1 in 125 odds are not as reassuring as you seem to think, although as you say not each of the incidents was an actual bomb.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  12. I love one of the comments... by shinehead · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "I don't blame the school...it's the continued pussification of America that is the real problem at hand". Wish I had said that. WTF is going on with these school admin? Dude is staff a magnet school, got to expect to come across situations like this and be able to deal with it. I think the school staff needs counseling not the kid and his family. Pussies.....

    1. Re:I love one of the comments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude is staff a magnet school...

      Wut.

  13. Talk about overreacting by Tisha_AH · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is part of the "nervous Nellie" reactions that have developed over the past few years. We should be encouraging inquisitiveness, exploration and learning in our children or we will just produce more mediocre administrators. Kids do things at home, bring them to school and show their friends. As long as it was not clearly a weapon or some other prohibited device there should not be a problem with it.

    We are applying the same "sterile area" rules that supposedly exist in our airports to our schools. Will TSA be staffing the schools to keep out prohibited items?

    Unless the child lied about what the device was it appears that the principal overreacted and did not apply too much common sense. It sounds like a pretty cool idea to use a Gatoraide bottle as a focusing point for a sonic device. Smart kid to think that through and to try something with it.

    How many people who read /. have tried out other things like this in their childhood? Most of us have.

    --
    Tisha Hayes
    1. Re:Talk about overreacting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my childhood I didn't have "Gatoraide" drinks, you insensitive clod!

    2. Re:Talk about overreacting by houghi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As a kid I played killing people. It was either cowboys and indians or police and robbers. But now apparently kids need to be cocooned till they are 18 and then must know everything at once. No time to learn what is right and wrong.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    3. Re:Talk about overreacting by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1

      And god forbid they should see a nipple until they are married!

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    4. Re:Talk about overreacting by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      A couple of kids in my year made explosives and tried to make napalm (without success in the latter case). Uh, so I heard.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    5. Re:Talk about overreacting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what's more, think of the kid. He tinkered at home, made a motion detector on his own, brought it in to show it off, and people freaked out. What's he going to learn from this? Don't tinker with gadgets, because people freak out and you end up in a world of trouble.

      Yeah, that's going to help America regain (or keep, depending on where you think the US stands right now) its technological edge. Discouraging the most inquisitive of society from an early age. Great thinking there.

    6. Re:Talk about overreacting by xaxa · · Score: 1

      houghi, IIRC, is from Belgium, so seeing nipples before marriage is acceptable.

    7. Re:Talk about overreacting by hanabal · · Score: 1

      my chemistry teacher taught us how to make gunpowder. in fact while making it, one of the students didn't do it quite right and it exploded in his face (he was fine, its just powder). He also showed us how to make sand that explodes when stepped on and actively encouraged us to sprinkle the football field with it.

    8. Re:Talk about overreacting by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      tried to make napalm

      Gee home economics at my school was boring by comparison. We had to make stuff you could eat.

    9. Re:Talk about overreacting by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1

      Then we must liberate Belgium immediately! Think of the children!

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    10. Re:Talk about overreacting by kullnd · · Score: 1

      You should see the lists of "Prohibited items" that my kids science fair projects include these days --- I have a hard time finding anything to do because of all the restrictions ... Kids today are just supposed to play xbox...

      --
      +++ATH0 NO CARRIER
    11. Re:Talk about overreacting by deniable · · Score: 1

      No, you pervert. Stop thinking of the children.

    12. Re:Talk about overreacting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet this is what went down:

      Teacher: Hey you, what's that you have there?
      Kid: A proximity sensor.
      Teacher: ...
      Teacher: ZOMG A PROXIMITY MINE RUN

    13. Re:Talk about overreacting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Will TSA be staffing the schools to keep out prohibited items?"

      Many schools have had metal detectors for years. I assume they do routine searches of backpacks as well.

      Not suggesting this is good, just pointing out that it's real.

      TW

    14. Re:Talk about overreacting by anyGould · · Score: 1

      Or if you must think of the children like that, go get a job as an airport screener so you can justify looking at naked kids as "national security".

    15. Re:Talk about overreacting by anyGould · · Score: 1

      Heck, I had a science teacher walk us through making alcohol from fruit once. (In the "purely theoretical" sense, of course).

      Man, I miss those teachers - the ones that realized that just a little forbidden knowledge went a long way into maintaining class interest. (Because who's going to risk skipping class if there's a chance he's gonna teach something *cool*?

    16. Re:Talk about overreacting by Brianwa · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the high school science fair project a few of my friends did. They wanted to test the effectiveness of a few types of model rocket engines that can be made at home, but the school authorities threw a fit about how rockets are dangerous. Instead, they were told it would be okay if they tested the effectiveness of their propellants using a homemade, constant volume calorimeter.

      These things are called bomb calorimeters for a reason. Their set up - which the school considered to be safer than model rockets - was literally a pipe bomb with temperature and pressure sensors mounted in it. They tried to use a small enough quantity of propellant to avoid an explosion. They weren't entirely successful at that goal, but they didn't mention that to the science fair operators :D

      To get their project approved, they had to write a safety report. Out of their several pages of BS, a single sentence in the middle described what they were actually doing. No one batted an eye.

    17. Re:Talk about overreacting by velen · · Score: 1

      As a kid I played killing people. It was either cowboys and indians or police and robbers. But now apparently kids need to be cocooned till they are 18 and then must know everything at once. No time to learn what is right and wrong.

      Of course, if they allowed people to get smart, the army wouldn't get recruits for the war on terror.

    18. Re:Talk about overreacting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Unless the child lied about what the device was it appears that the principal overreacted and did not apply too much common sense. It sounds like a pretty cool idea to use a Gatoraide bottle as a focusing point for a sonic device. Smart kid to think that through and to try something with it.

      How many people who read /. have tried out other things like this in their childhood? Most of us have."

      Nope. I was boring. I just used to make rockets and bombs like the rest of the neighbourhood children did......

    19. Re:Talk about overreacting by Phred+T.+Magnificent · · Score: 1

      In high school (back when dinosaurs roamed the earth and TV was black and white) a group of us put together a game of assassination with toy guns, foam rubber knives, methylene blue and what-have-you. The rule was that your "weapon" couldn't do any actual physical harm to the target, but that it otherwise had to in some way resemble the real thing -- e.g. guns had to actually shoot something, poisons had to change the color or taste of the food, etc.

      As a concession to school rules, we agreed not to play during class. Between classes, at lunch or on the way to or from school was fine.

      I shudder to think where a group of kids would end up if they did that today...

      --
      Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge?
      Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?
    20. Re:Talk about overreacting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And god forbid they should see a nipple until they are married!

      Even the girls! (note to self: remove all mirrors from daughter's bedroom)

  14. They do need counselling by syousef · · Score: 1

    Clearly parents that expect their child to be educated by morons who think anything with wires and a clear container must be a bomb, and don't take enough interest in the child to ask him what he's building, need counseling about their choice of schools. If the kid managed to build a motion detector at 11, that doesn't make him a genius, but they should be looking at advanced classes taught by competent and sane people.

    I think the entire faculty and investigating police should get counseling over this drama too, preferably at the local unemployment office.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:They do need counselling by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Clearly parents that expect their child to be educated by morons who think anything with wires and a clear container must be a bomb...

      Don't be too hard on the vice-principal. The red and blue wires always cause some confusion and there were probably some blinking lights too. On the other hand, he could be a moron.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    2. Re:They do need counselling by DeadPixels · · Score: 1

      They probably thought he was in a school with advanced classes. After all, this school was supposed to "emphasize technology skills."

    3. Re:They do need counselling by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      Snip: ...and there were probably some blinking lights too.

      ACHTUNG! Alles touristen und non-technischen peepers!

          Das machine control is nicht fur gerfinger-poken und
          mittengrabben. Oderwise is easy schnappen der springenwerk,
          blowen fuse, und poppencorken mit spitzensparken.
          Der machine is diggen by experten only. Is nicht fur
          geverken by das dummkopfen. Das rubbernecken sightseenen
          keepen das cotten picken hands in das pockets,
          so relaxen und watchen das blinkenlights.

      From http://www.blinkenlights.nl/

      P.S.: Please do not forward this to the vice-principal as I'm certain that the F.B.I., D.O.J., State Dept., C.I.A., and D.H.S. would be annoyed having to explain to him that it's not a terrorist threat or bomb instructions, especially as the latter group of agencies & departments seem to be displaying an increasingly-shaky grasp on the definitions of such as of late, and we wouldn't want to confuse them further.

      Thanks,

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  15. Science fairs before High School.... by Upaut · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Tend to show the deranged thoughts of the teachers more than anything else... I remember my project netted me a month of drug counseling, because the application "could" of been used to grow cannabis.... The project was just a kid showing how plants grew differently in different media, hydroponically, with soil, with microorganisms that were advertised to help bind nitrogen in roots and increase growth, and with plant hormones. (All save hydroponically done in the same bag soil, just with the different additives...)

    So my project was removed, and I was instructed not to build any more hydroponic settups in my spare time... Which my parents told me to ignore in my own home, but still.....

    --
    3 degrees of separation from Vladimir Putin
    1. Re:Science fairs before High School.... by negRo_slim · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hey counseling not bad! I got full on expulsion for making a VB program to switch screen resolutions... in a VB class. Sadly I'd do it again, I just don't roll with 640x480x8 !

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    2. Re:Science fairs before High School.... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So they told you that you had a great way to grow marijuana? Thats nice of them. I wonder what experience led them to that idea.

    3. Re:Science fairs before High School.... by future+assassin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      At one of the local schools when the police came to do anti drug speech and the police officer was talking about cannabis he asked the students (grade 3/4) if any of their parents had an indoor garden inside the house. This was quite the set up.

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    4. Re:Science fairs before High School.... by omglolbah · · Score: 0, Troll

      I rooted the school server and regularly let the admin know about exploits that could compromize security when in high school :-p

      He didnt care that I had access as I was not in any way malicious in what I did...

      I've brought electronics projects to school all through my school years and never had an issue with it... Glad I dont live in the US..

    5. Re:Science fairs before High School.... by melikamp · · Score: 1

      A direct personal experience? [Ducks]

    6. Re:Science fairs before High School.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Glad I dont live in the US..

      Trust me, Americans are glad you don't either.

    7. Re:Science fairs before High School.... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      That's a classic science fair project. Still, I guess if you're in a war, there are casualties.

      Now, the next question is why the US is always at war. Sometimes even with actual opponents.

    8. Re:Science fairs before High School.... by deniable · · Score: 1

      Kid gets busted as a grower later in life. "My teachers suggested it." Career counseling?

    9. Re:Science fairs before High School.... by deniable · · Score: 1

      Best drug talk we ever got was the cop that said the guys would grow breasts if they smoked pot. The guys looking down their shirts was a give-away.

    10. Re:Science fairs before High School.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long ago was that, how big was the school, and where (roughly)? Quite an overreaction for something that had no ill intent and could be easily explained.

      On the other hand, I once guessed the administrator password in an enrollment application. Computers were in the library, and this was back in '89 or '90. The name of the school was West High School. I guessed "westhigh". I remember thinking of an episode of "The Bloodhound Gang" (anybody remember 3-2-1 Contact on PBS?) where they guessed a computer password.

      Anyhow, my mistake was showing a "friend". He and I decided to change the password to "condom". But then I left it alone. He proceeded to log in frequently and screw around with enrollment stuff (he hoped he could change grades, of course). He got nabbed while accessing the app, then snitched me out. Meanwhile the school had to hire a professional to attempt to "hack into" the application which had ceased functioning for all teachers (same set of credentials for all!), but his job was made easier when we were marched into the VP's office and told them our new password.

      I believe we each got a kind of disciplinary probation and a $50 fine, each. I'm sure they didn't know what to do with us, exactly. But I'd known I did something stupid, and know I got off lucky.

      These days, well, I'm thinking I wouldn't have the career in IT that I do today. Posted as AC for obvious reasons...

    11. Re:Science fairs before High School.... by FrankieBaby1986 · · Score: 1

      ??? I'd love to know more about that story! I sent a Windows Messenger Service message to nearly every computer in Abington Senior and Abington Junior highschools when I was there. In fact, I sent 100 of them all at once (evil laugh). Simply saying "Hello Jr Highschoolers" and "Hello Senior Highschoolers". I got called to the office but never even got talked to. Guess I got off lucky!

      --
      ERROR: SIG NOT FOUND (A)bort, (R)etry, (F)ail?:
    12. Re:Science fairs before High School.... by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      I had a war going on with the school admin in HS. I got annoyed one day that she'd dropped new security on the computers in the library and I could no longer do my programming work there anytime I wanted, so I disabled it (the first time around was the easy one, boot off external, change the autoexec.bat entry to start the secuirty software, reboot. I left her a msg on the machine explaining how and why.

      She upgraded the software

      I did it again (it was a bit harder the next time - no booting off externals anymore for one thing :-p).

      This went on for quite a while, until I started using an old laptop my father had given me which I could drop my own IDE and compilers and such on and be able to code *and* compile while in the library (a compaq armada 1750 that I still have somewhere and it still works - most durable laptop I've ever seen, it has been dropped down stairs, in parking lots, battered around sans case in a backpack, had the case melted by a glue gun and a hot light at a couple points, had various alcoholic and sugary drinks spilled on it, etc).

      The admin and I actually became friends later.

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    13. Re:Science fairs before High School.... by omglolbah · · Score: 1

      Wow... I had a compaq armada 7380DMT at the time.
      And yes... it just refused to die even when treated like it was a sheet of steel with no moving parts :-p

    14. Re:Science fairs before High School.... by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      I have to say, they really *don't* make 'em like they used to! I wish my MBP could stand the kind of punishment my armada could

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
  16. Re:WTF? by miknix · · Score: 1

    And this is how to terminate a possible promising career in electronics. Seriously, the kid will never be the same. He either won't touch on electronics anymore OR next time the project won't just look like a bomb.

  17. Fucked up paranoia by Luc1fel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, it wasn't enough that the device from the poor kid (who showed some practical skills) was perfectly harmless, his home also had to be checked just in case he was a terrorist?

    That's fucked up beyond 1984.

    1. Re:Fucked up paranoia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing there was no gas in the garage, or solvents, or nails, or pesticides, or rat poison, or a box cutter, or ...

      Actually, I'm sure McGyver could make a terrific diversion out of any number of common garage items!

    2. Re:Fucked up paranoia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Since it was firemen who searched his home, "fucked up beyond 451" would be more appropriate...

  18. Insane times we live in. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Here is a posting by a soldier in http://www2.ljworld.com/weblogs/musings/2009/apr/19/airport-security/

    vertigo (Jesse Crittenden) says

    Ironically while flying out of KMCI on my way to Iraq for the Air Force I had to go through the extra security screening. Mind you I'm in full military uniform, desert BDUs, boots, boonie hat, M4 in tow sure enough though I had to take off my boots and all metal objects and get the wand ran over me and extra check through my carry on. Let's ignore the fact that I'm carrying a rifle onboard!

    Common sense sometimes does not apply.

    In the case of the elderly lady I see nothing whatsoever wrong with her getting the same screening as everyone else. Terrorists will use whatever they can to exploit a weakness; that could be a handicapped person, the elderly and children.

    Stop the world, it has gone mad, I want to get off.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Insane times we live in. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I disagree with that one. If you're going to randomly search people, put everyone in the pot. Yeah, searching a guy who's going to be allowed to carry a rifle on board is stupid, but he should go through the same irritating process as everyone else. Ditto with politicians and other policy makers.

    2. Re:Insane times we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soldiers in uniform are routinely picked for secondary screening because TSA knows its an easy way to fill their quota.

    3. Re:Insane times we live in. by JustShootMe · · Score: 1

      I guess you think that terrorists would never dress as a member of the US military.

      --
      For linux tips: http://www.linuxtipsblog.com
    4. Re:Insane times we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought -only- air marshals could carry on an aircraft. No other LEO or military?

    5. Re:Insane times we live in. by Dr.Syshalt · · Score: 1

      So how does security check help in this case? Is it supposed to make the rifle he carries safer... or what?

    6. Re:Insane times we live in. by JustShootMe · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it doesn't. I'm just making the point that you are not special because you are military.

      Not in terms of privileges, and not in terms of counterfeiters.

      --
      For linux tips: http://www.linuxtipsblog.com
    7. Re:Insane times we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      He's not the only one. It happened to me while I was wearing a flight suit and carrying the issue beretta. Never mind the knife in my pocket (my letter said I was authorized to carry the sidearm and survival knife), they flipped about a metal paperclip in my medical records. I almost cried.

    8. Re:Insane times we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So in one breath he complains about getting the same screening as everyone else, and in the next he tries to argue that nobody should be exempt because terrorists will use that?

    9. Re:Insane times we live in. by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      I dont think the point was he was special because he was in the military. I think the point was that since he already was being allowed to carry a deadly weapon on board, checking him for deadly weapons was rather pointless.

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    10. Re:Insane times we live in. by St.Creed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps it doesn't. I'm just making the point that you are not special because you are military.

      Unfortunately, your point that may be valid 'in abstracto', has no relation to the actual facts we're discussing. As soon as the guards had established he had a right to carry a rifle onto the plane, any search for other guns (that was what they try to find with a metal detector) or even a knife was a useless waste of time.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    11. Re:Insane times we live in. by anyGould · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, I'm thinking that if you're going to let him carry a freakin' assault rifle on board the aircraft, the rest of the security inspection is rather pointless.

      I think terrorists are now more likely to dress as a member of the US military, since instead of futzing with MacGyver-reject bombs, you can just.. oh.. shoot the passengers.

  19. Poor kid by whoisisis · · Score: 1

    I hope he doesn't let this episode interfere with his cool hobby. If he keeps on toying with electronics, he could end up with a really cool and useful job. An 11 year old making a motion detector -- how cool is that?

  20. Counseling? by BigDXLT · · Score: 1

    The kid is not the one who needs counseling.

    1. Re:Counseling? by MooUK · · Score: 1

      The kid *shouldn't* need counselling. However, after all the chaos and shouting and blaming involved in something like this, he could probably do with some.

    2. Re:Counseling? by Renraku · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Counseling for being so stupid as to take some initiative and build something on his own. That's not what schools want to teach. Schools want to train the next generation of assembly line workers, Wal-Mart employees, and gas station attendants. Scratch that, they don't even want to do that, what they really want to do is make sure everyone meets the minimum requirements set by the state/federation so that they can continue to get funding.

      Teachers, on the other hand, want so much more for the students than they themselves have the time or money to give.

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
  21. Profiling much? by Taur0 · · Score: 1

    How much do you want to bet that the student is a Muslim or looked like one?

  22. Give the schools more money by Kohath · · Score: 1

    They're doing such a great job. They deserve a reward.

  23. The tech teachers at this magnet school... by PottedMeat · · Score: 1

    couldn't figure out if this was hazardous? Clear container, no solid or liquid substance to be seen. Doesn't speak much for the teachers imo Maybe they thought it was a remote det. Who knows what kind of bs comes to people's frightened minds nowadays.

    1. Re:The tech teachers at this magnet school... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hydrogen is flammable and transparent.

      Disclaimer: The above is not intended as an endorsement of these morons.

  24. This really takes the cake by greg_barton · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I thought I couldn't be more surprised by crazy school administrator and police stupidity, but I was wrong.

    Everyone really should read TFA this time.

    From TFA:

    Students were evacuated from Millennial Tech Magnet Middle School...

    ...and...

    Luque said the project was made of an empty half-liter Gatorade bottle with some wires and other electrical components attached. There was no substance inside.

    When police and the Metro Arson Strike Team responded, they also found electrical components in the student's backpack, Luque said. After talking to the student, it was decided about 1 p.m. to evacuate the school as a precaution while the item was examined.

    So, having electronics in your backpack is grounds for evacuating a TECH MAGNET?

    Seriously?

    What happened to the country that put the first man on the moon? We have gone completely insane.

    1. Re:This really takes the cake by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2

      Litigation happened. On the day you can be absolutely right, but any parent can still sue you for endangering their child and get a nice retirement payout from the schools insurance policy.

    2. Re:This really takes the cake by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Let me emphasize the best part:

      After talking to the student, it was decided about 1 p.m. to evacuate the school as a precaution while the item was examined.

      So they get there, the kid tells them what's going on.... THEN they decide to evacuate and examine it with a bomb robot (which takes two more hours). If that was a bomb and the kid wanted to use it, they were now four hours too late. Other than that, nice to show some faith/confidence in the kids.

      Now, the kid is "quite shaken"... and quite possibly will stop doing this kind of work on his own. Well done.

    3. Re:This really takes the cake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not in California. Liability of a public school is limited to $10K (or $20K in some cases). Likewise, liabiity of a parent for something that their kid does at school is limited.

    4. Re:This really takes the cake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happened to the country that put the first man on the moon? We have gone completely insane.

      I think you just answered your own question.

    5. Re:This really takes the cake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      now it's the country that is afraid to get out of bed.

    6. Re:This really takes the cake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >

      What happened to the country that put the first man on the moon? We have gone completely insane.

      Another reason to believe the moonlanding was a fake.

  25. No substance? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Funny

    Luque said the project was made of an empty half-liter Gatorade bottle with some wires and other electrical components attached. There was no substance inside.

    This kid is clearly a genius. He has created the worlds first 100% hard vacuum, in a soft drink bottle no less. He has even eliminated zero point energy.

    1. Re:No substance? by deniable · · Score: 1

      Better yet, airport security has to check for 'air' based explosives. No liquids, no empty containers or would that be no sealed containers?

  26. Electronics are scary by chrysrobyn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When I was in college, I would periodically bring my electronics homework home from Albany to Phoenix. I would usually work on it the entire time tray tables were allowed. Often I didn't need a textbook, only my engineering paper (overpriced graph paper) and my calculator. I would often make those next to me nervous, but obviously I couldn't harm anyone with paper and a pencil. Well, significantly anyway.

    As I got to the intermediate classes, I would often find myself with schematics, a bag of chips and wires, and a breadboard. Again, plenty of time to just sit there, I would wire up my breadboard with the chips, wires, and my Leatherman. I had more than a few flight attendants strike up a conversation with me long enough to find out that I was going home / to school, was an engineering student, and was working on a finite state machine / simple computer / complicated blinky light thing. "Wanna see? This is so cool! Watch these eight lights blink! I can program it with these switches!" The only time the conversation lasted even a sentence longer was when I was building laser tag. "No, it doesn't actually have any lasers, they just use that name because it sounds cool. It actually works like your remote control to your TV."

    Even at the time, I was fully aware that any technical work done in a public place would draw the skepticism, imagination, and periodically, fear of those around me. Of course, this was in the mid 90's. Times and personal liberties on airplanes in particular are very different. Now, they'd throw a fit if I tried to take my Leatherman near the plane, let alone the chips and bundle of wires running off a 9 volt. I'm much more mature now, and now I see no reason to make people uncomfortable on an airplane in order to stretch their preconceptions.

    The kid and his parents now learned a valuable lesson. Work transparently. Don't hide it in a bottle. When it's complete, more times than not, it shouldn't have a top case. If it needs a case, no external wires should be visible.

    1. Re:Electronics are scary by Dragoniz3r · · Score: 1

      Work transparently. Don't hide it in a bottle. When it's complete, more times than not, it shouldn't have a top case. If it needs a case, no external wires should be visible.

      The personal anecdotes were cool and all, but I'm not sure how you can work any more transparently than a gatorade bottle. The things are clear plastic. If there was a quantity of explosive in it, it'd be visible. So, the only "valuable lesson" the kid and his parents learned is that the populace doesn't have a damn clue what explosives look like, or how much of them it takes to do damage (ie, enough to be easily visible).

    2. Re:Electronics are scary by Chas · · Score: 1

      We're talking about work done by an 11 year old kid here on a very simple implementation of a motion detector.

      Not some final-year electrical engineering student wiring up a blinknenlights redux.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    3. Re:Electronics are scary by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      obviously I couldn't harm anyone with paper and a pencil

      No wonder you ended up posting on /. If you were a Ninja, you could have demolished two blocks quite easily without even sharpening the pencil!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    4. Re:Electronics are scary by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1

      I have never had any trouble taking boxes of electronics bits with me, even circuit boards and suspicious-looking wiring, with me on a plane. It might be because there are no large batteries of ambiguous looking blocks of substance in there that might be bombs. Although, it might also be because my batteries are all small and the name on my boarding pass has a 'doctor' in front of it.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    5. Re:Electronics are scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a Gatorade bottle. I don't know if you've ever drunk Gatorade, but bottles don't get a whole lot more transparent than that.

    6. Re:Electronics are scary by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      The bottle was clear. It's hard to get any more transparent.

    7. Re:Electronics are scary by Kyusaku+Natsume · · Score: 1

      My older brother and I used to find in the same bus we ride to go back home from the school a guy who was studying Electronics Engineering. It was really neat to see his protoboard with all those wires and strange -at the time- components. It inspired both of us to study Electronics. If this kid's motion detector really worked, perhaps it could have inspired his friends to study harder an make other interesting projects. Instead, the kids learned that they shouldn't make anything that could inspire irrational fear on adults and to be fearful too.

      Millennial Tech Magnet Middle School motto: working hard to make USA a third world country since xxxx.

      --
      Mexico: 100% conservative's America now!
    8. Re:Electronics are scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What color is hydrogen peroxide? What color is acetone? What do those two combine to make? What does color have to do with irrational fear?

  27. Fuckwhit by Gogogoch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What a fuckwhit - the school principal should be fired.

    1. Re:Fuckwhit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems to me a school that'd hire a vice principal like this would fire him/her if, oh, say, 1000+ people (who didn't even live in the district) signed a petition stating that he/she should be fired.

      You notice how the article didn't say who the vice principal was? (Apparently they have two. Two vice principals?) Someone's butt is being covered

      It seems that the "vice principals are dicks" standard is alive and well - my old school had to fire the VP for spanking a kid in his underwear.

  28. A day with the vice principal by istartedi · · Score: 4, Funny

    He bolted out of bed and carefully defused the alarm clock before it went off, after concluding that... it was a bomb.

    He went to shave, but before turning it on decided to throw the razor out the window after concluding that... it was a bomb.

    He decided not to make toast after concluding that the toaster was...

    Better not drive, he thought...

    Got on a bus. There was a guy with a radio. He called 911. Got off the bus before the police arrived though.

    Arrived at school. Reported science fair project as possible bomb.

    Police showed up at school. Hey? Are you the guy who called 911?

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:A day with the vice principal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The VP is JC Denton. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tOKt1z1TkvU

      QED.

    2. Re:A day with the vice principal by LarryWake · · Score: 1

      OT: in your sig, were you using "for all intensive purposes" sarcastically as commentary on the decay of grammar in today's society? If so, carry on, but if not, please be aware that the actual phrase is "for all intents and purposes."

    3. Re:A day with the vice principal by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      If you're going to be a pedant, go all the way: even though it is a common phrase, there is no plural for intent, since it is a non-count abstract noun.

              -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    4. Re:A day with the vice principal by shovas · · Score: 1

      Best. Commentary. Ever.

      --
      Selah.ca. Pause, and calmly think on that.
    5. Re:A day with the vice principal by SilasMortimer · · Score: 1

      I suck, I suck, I suck, and this is totally going to get modded off-top and I completely deserve it.

      It's your quote. The phrase is "for all intents and purposes". I'm not picking on you. I'm a jackass, but I'm not picking on you. I just see this all the time and I try and I try, but my inner grammar Nazi is forcing me to finally say something.

      --
      Omnes tuae crepidines sunt nobis sunt. Ascendo tuum!
  29. another misleading summary by Main+Gauche · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you RTFA, it looks like the cops are saying that they should get counseling because the kid and parents were upset by the incident.

    Regardless of whether the search was reasonable, do you realize how misled you (and many others, including those who've responded to you) have been by the summary's "scare quotes"? The summary makes it sounds like the kid is being sent in for "reprogramming".

    I'm probably wasting my time typing this, because it won't change anything anyway. Slashdotters will primarily continue to curse the way the government misleads the citizens, then turn around and fall for this kind of crap.

    1. Re:another misleading summary by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I think the issue is why were authorities called at all? I had lots of electronics at school. Radios I built myself. Projects I had to do for classes. It was never an issue. A few of our teachers knew a lot more about that stuff than I did. Several had done electronic work in industry before they became teachers.

    2. Re:another misleading summary by letsief · · Score: 5, Informative

      I agree it's sort of hard to know one way or the other, but I think the author of the article is implying the student and parents need counseling so this sort of thing doesn't happen again. The article's statement about counseling was stated right after it discussed the fire officials searching the home for explosives. And, it was in the same paragraph that said the student wasn't going to be prosecuted, but violated school policies. The article does talk about the student and parents being upset, but that's a little later in the article.

      Maybe the author of the article is misleading us, but (somewhat uncharacteristically) Slashdot's summary seems to be pretty accurate.

    3. Re:another misleading summary by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "I agree it's sort of hard to know one way or the other"

      I think it's rather obvious what the article is saying and I agree with the GP that the summary is using 'scare quotes' it is also strongly implying that school policy is designed to crush independent thought. However TFA does not say what school policy the kid broke nor does it imply the school was sending him to renedification camp, it says...

      "The student will not be prosecuted, but authorities were recommending that he and his parents get counseling, the spokesman [Luque] said. The student violated school policies, but there was no criminal intent, Luque said."

      It then has two sentances expanding on the point of charges and costs before it gives the reason for the recommendation; "Luque said both the student and his parents were extremely upset. "He was very shaken by the whole situation, as were his parents".

      Luque is the spokesman for the San Diego Fire-Rescue Department, and although the school may agree he is not speaking for them when he uses the word "authorities".

      "Slashdot's summary seems to be pretty accurate."

      It's not the facts in TFS the GP is complaining about, it's the misleading inuendo that panders to the paranoid delusions of a large number of slashdotters.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    4. Re:another misleading summary by gnapster · · Score: 1

      If you RTFA, it looks like the cops are saying that they should get counseling because the kid and parents were upset by the incident.

      Actually, the way I read the pertitent part of TFA, the counselling recommendation sounds to be in lieu of more serious consequences rather than as a concession to what the student and family have been put through (my emphasis added):

      The student will not be prosecuted, but authorities were recommending that he and his parents get counseling, the spokesman said. The student violated school policies, but there was no criminal intent, Luque said.

      That sounds to me like the point of the counselling is to help the family learn how to avoid unwittingly inciting panic.

    5. Re:another misleading summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, counseling as in "we're sorry that we are so incredibly stupid, sincerely The School."

    6. Re:another misleading summary by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      >> Regardless of whether the search was reasonable, do you realize how misled you have been by the summary's "scare quotes"?

      OMG!!! "scare quotes" in Slashdot!! The terrorists have won!!11one

            dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    7. Re:another misleading summary by fishexe · · Score: 1

      If you RTFA, it looks like the cops are saying that they should get counseling because the kid and parents were upset by the incident.

      No it doesn't. It sounds exactly like the counseling they always give to kids who "do something wrong", like when a kid in Madison, WI brought a paring knife to school for a scientific demonstration and was told to undergo anger management counseling because it was a "weapon". There are lots of other examples but that's always how they describe forcing the kid to undergo counseling because the school can't admit it was wrong, and therefore has to make it seem like the kid is messed up to begin with. If it were as you say, they would have said it was recommended for the kid, not required. Required counseling is a CYA for the admin.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    8. Re:another misleading summary by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      it's the misleading inuendo that panders to the paranoid delusions of a large number of slashdotters

      It makes me wonder just what the average age of slashdotters is, as when any story involving a school comes out, the intense seriousness of reactions suggest that most people here are still at school themselves, or have only just left.
      I'm going for an average of 17, to be generous.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  30. Re:WTF? by mindwhip · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    next time the project won't just look like a bomb

    Even if it is one...

    --
    [The Universe] has gone offline.
  31. Cooperative by dereference · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...his home also had to be checked...

    Yes, that's the most shocking part of the story to me as well. I'm not sure I'd be very cooperative with the authorities if I were the parents. I think I'd turn it into yet another learning moment, showing the kid how not to bow unquestioningly to authority. I'd have called an attorney, and politely declined the search until a proper warrant was served.

    I'm guessing the parents were horrified to learn of the inconvenience imposed by the morons in charge, and wanted to get it over quickly and prove that their kid was good, so I don't fault them at all for cooperating. But they weren't responsible for the hysteria, and they shouldn't have been pressured to comply. It's as if the authorities allowed the administration to hold the entire school hostage, until this unfortunate family was forced to prove its own innocence. It's quite insane.

    1. Re:Cooperative by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I am sure they found many potential bombs around that house. How about the can of fuel for the mower? I wonder if they did anything about that?

      I have written previously here about the misadventures my father and I had with accidental explosives. The classic was the electrolysis setup inside a sealed sewer pipe. These days I would look at laser printer toner and flower. Nasty, explosive stuff in the right concentrations. How about staging it? Liquid petrol, petrol vapour and toner? And a spark plug, obviously. Or a 1/4 watt resistor.

    2. Re:Cooperative by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's the most shocking part of the story to me as well. I'm not sure I'd be very cooperative with the authorities if I were the parents. I think I'd turn it into yet another learning moment, showing the kid how not to bow unquestioningly to authority. I'd have called an attorney, and politely declined the search until a proper warrant was served.

      Do you honestly think that if the authorities really believed a bomb was being put together there and the parents had refused the search, the police would have shown up a couple of hours later and gently knocked on the door to say "Excuse me, madam, I have a warrant to search this house for explosives, please allow me to execute it peacefully"?

    3. Re:Cooperative by anyGould · · Score: 1

      I am sure they found many potential bombs around that house. How about the can of fuel for the mower? I wonder if they did anything about that?

      I had the same thought, but in the context of the school itself - how many things in an average school are (or could easily be made) dangerous?

  32. Get Counsel rather than Counseling. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In order to sue the fuck out of those idiots, I mean.

  33. TFA sucks by shadowrat · · Score: 1

    TFA leaves me with a ton of questions. Wouldn't his teacher have known of this project (assuming that science projects are for school)? I don't recall getting the assignment, "Make a science project", in school. My teachers always checked in every step of the way.
    Why did they think it was a bomb? Did the kid deny it was a bomb? I usually don't think of 11 year olds as making explosives with complicated electronic detonators. Did the kid claim it was a bomb jokingly or just to be difficult?
    What is the counseling recommended for? Is it because the kid and family are upset that all this happened (understandable) or because he's a troublemaker/prankster kid who's causing problems?

    1. Re:TFA sucks by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I don't recall getting the assignment, "Make a science project", in school.

      Here in Victoria, Australia we did. I built a NiCD battery charger (effectively an op-amp based constant current source) and my friend built a wind tunnel. Both of us were into model aircraft at the time so both projects were kind of practical. It was basically a matter of building whatever interested us and bringing it into school. The Bomb Squad never got involved though it would have been cool to see their robot in action. Damn. Missed opportunity.

    2. Re:TFA sucks by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      The counseling is for trying to learn outside of school. He's obviously insane, nobody would ever do that. He sounds like some kind of socialist elitist.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    3. Re:TFA sucks by SpaceCadets · · Score: 1

      Totaly offtopic, but I gotta say in response to your sig... I work in the warehouse that sends them to you! And I can't believe we're still sending out paper phone books!

    4. Re:TFA sucks by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      This is in Australia? I saw on a TV show they had a competition for people to send in pictures showing their use for the yellow pages. One application I saw was to help their cat get through the cat flap.

    5. Re:TFA sucks by SpaceCadets · · Score: 1

      Yup, I live in Melb (sorry, not going to say the town I work in), but all Sensis Yellow/White pages, as well as the car sized phone books and directories go through where I work... the racks are full of them, my desk is in the warehouse and I can see them right here from my desk. Small world mate! :)

  34. meanwhile... by binaryseraph · · Score: 1

    The kid who made the explosive with baking soda and vinegar (or water and dry ice) is getting an A+.

  35. School policy by michaelmalak · · Score: 5, Interesting
    There you have it: using wires in a science project violates school policy.

    There's a new DVD out called The War on Kids. The thesis is that schools are prisons and are about surveillance, metal detectors, and control. One of the best parts is where they are receiving a tour through a school, and they ask to see the library, which has a high-security metal door with metal grate over the glass. The principal can't find the key and asks, "did you really need to get in here?"

    Learning is against school policy.

    1. Re:School policy by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      This kid should build surveillance devices and metal detectors. Just as interesting and its also getting with the school program.

    2. Re:School policy by cynyr · · Score: 3, Informative

      Cation to all about the link in the above. It will resize your browser window repeatedly if you have javascript and flash enabled. Some warning would have been nice from the parent about that.

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
    3. Re:School policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe normal strait wires could be allowed, as (in real films) bombs are always made using wires curled into springs because bomb electricity can't flow through strait wires.
      But LED's should be totally baned! Ever seen a bomb without flashing LED?

    4. Re:School policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like to see the DVD, but that webpage is evil. It's pure Flash and it plays obnoxious noises and resizes your browser window. Pure EVIL webpage.

    5. Re:School policy by anyGould · · Score: 1

      Here's a fun thought: you have access to electronics, and you're in a public school. In terms of fun:trouble ratio, a bomb is clearly suboptimal. Build a widget that turns the school TVs on and off. Jam the faculty wireless network. The options are endless (and now that we've proven the school can't tell what stuff does anyway, it's all easily deniable.)

  36. Nothing like 1984 by Velodra · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's fucked up beyond 1984.

    This is nothing like 1984. 1984 was about censorship and oppression, this is just paranoia. It probably happened due to a combination of the fear of terrorism and people's fear of technology they can't understand. Not they I don't think this both sad and slightly scary, but there are other things that can be wrong with society than trying to imitate 1984

  37. If you REALLY want to let them know what you think by Chas · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's the Contact Us page for Millennial Tech Middle School.

    http://www.mtechmiddle.org/apps/contact/?rn=8783875

    Maybe if enough people ask, they'll actually tell someone why they have a complete fucking moron in a position of scholastic authority over their kids.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  38. This is why people DROP OUT OF SCHOOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    My younger brother used to get in trouble for telling his math and science teachers that they were fools and idiots when they asked him questions in class. Nothing was very challenging to him. He dropped out after the 10th grade.

    He went to Community College, got straight A's. He got into an engineering program at a public university, got almost straight A's. Now he's finished his PhD at the top engineering school in the country, in his field, MIT.

    American schools are there to train the rank and file. In fact everyone that I know that works in a scientific field had dangerous aspirations in their teenage years, and didn't think much of the education our systems were providing. It became clear to all of us that if we cared to actually learn anything, it would be on our own.

    1. Re:This is why people DROP OUT OF SCHOOL by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      My younger brother used to get in trouble for telling his math and science teachers that they were fools and idiots

      No fucking shit, Sherlock.
      I assume with that attitude he's now a regular slashdot poster?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  39. Counseling for the student? by hAckz0r · · Score: 0, Troll
    I would recommend sending the uneducated vice-principal back to school to learn what they missed in their own grade school. If a student is that far advanced that the vice-principal (aka. advanced placement teacher) doesn't understand things, then they need to be re-educated to the point of being able to actually teach again. Being an administrator is no excuse, since the path to that position is through a teaching position to begin with. Nobody should be in charge of the teachers at any school that can't do the job themselves. As an administrator, at the very least, the vice-principle should have 'known enough' to call upon the science teachers available at the school to give a proper assessment of the technology/situation, and then acted based on that information, not some uneducated knee-jerk-reaction to something they don't even understand.

    Sounds to me like one of those old b-rated Sci-Fi movies:

    Oh no! It's something too complicated for me to understand!! Run for your life!!!

  40. Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why even bother having the science fair if projects are going to get that kind of reaction?

  41. Wow. When I was in school, kids made real bombs. by dr2chase · · Score: 1

    Not very large, but it did make an enormous kaboom, and rendered the locker in which it detonated somewhat egg-shaped.

    And no, it was not me.

  42. Article missing a critical detail. by BitterOak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I actually read TFA, and it states, as the summary quotes, "Apparently, the student violated school policies", but the article doesn't state the policy in question. It is hard to know if this is a case of stupid overreaction or a real violation of the rules. Does anyone know the exact wording of this "policy"?

    --
    If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    1. Re:Article missing a critical detail. by compro01 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Does anyone know the exact wording of this "policy"?

      "Students shall not perform any action that could result in any staff member looking like an incompetent moron"

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    2. Re:Article missing a critical detail. by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1, Troll

      I actually read TFA, and it states, as the summary quotes, "Apparently, the student violated school policies", but the article doesn't state the policy in question. It is hard to know if this is a case of stupid overreaction or a real violation of the rules. Does anyone know the exact wording of this "policy"?

      "Under no circumstance shall the student, by action or inaction, directly or indirectly, cause school administration, faculty or staff to appear inept, hysterical or foolish, whether this is or is not the intent of the student."

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    3. Re:Article missing a critical detail. by Lorens · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sure. I'll save you the read: there is nothing relevant in there.

      http://www.mtechmiddle.org/apps/pages/index.jsp?uREC_ID=58810&type=d&termREC_ID=&pREC_ID=87933&hideMenu=1&rn=6634111

      Their About Us/Mission and Vision Statement is a gas, though.

    4. Re:Article missing a critical detail. by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

      The entire page looks like it was written by a 7th grade D Student. Horrible.

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
    5. Re:Article missing a critical detail. by stenWolf · · Score: 1

      I actually read TFA, and it states, as the summary quotes, "Apparently, the student violated school policies", but the article doesn't state the policy in question. It is hard to know if this is a case of stupid overreaction or a real violation of the rules. Does anyone know the exact wording of this "policy"?

      http://www.mtechmiddle.org/apps/pages/index.jsp?uREC_ID=58810&type=d&termREC_ID=&pREC_ID=87933&hideMenu=1&rn=8708720

  43. Well in my book, by Hurricane78 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    that vice-principal is a terrorist.
    It’s exactly what the dictionary says. (I don’t mean the 11th edition of the newspeak one, that you may think of. ;)
    He terrorizes an 11 year old child. (Think of the children!) He terrorizes the whole family. He causes fear, terror that requires police intervention.

    I say, make an example and ship him to Gitmo, in exchange for a honest American who sits down there just because his parents immigrated from the wrong country.
    I’d call that the American spirit! ;)

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  44. Well, clearly .. by cheros · · Score: 1

    .. you need councelling. :-)

    My problem is that I really have to start memorising a new series of words for this sort of crap. It makes "moron" a compliment, which isn't quite my intention. Even "room temperature IQ" won't do unless you qualify that that is at the North Pole with the windows open.. Sjeez.

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
    1. Re:Well, clearly .. by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Converting to metric wrks vers well in that regard; room temperature is 18-22 degrees Celsius. Yes, in Europe "room temperature IQ" is a tina bit harsher than in the States.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  45. Taking the same thing into airport likely will mak by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1, Troll

    Taking the same thing into airport likely will make you see some real hard time vs what this kid got.

  46. Re:WTF? by Draek · · Score: 1

    Given how 'cooperative' his parents were with the authorities, most likely. Pity, though, few have such enthusiasm so young.

    If such a thing had happened to me, my parents would've been in school the next morning to demand a public apology from both the school and the vice-principal himself, as well as any required paperwork necessary to transfer me to another school.

    --
    No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
  47. A New Rule by b4upoo · · Score: 0, Troll

    Perhaps the new rule should be : Thou shall make no device that your principal can not understand".
                          I'll bet what really happened was that the kid made what is called a trembler which is sometimes used by bomb builders to create a trigger if any movement what so ever occurs to the bomb. There are legitimate uses of tremblers which include keeping large fans from destroying everything in sight if they get out of balance. These normally have a drop of mercury sitting in a tiny dimple such that shaking cause the droplet to lift out of the dimple and complete a circuit between two plates of metal, one above and one below the droplet. Obviously ideas like a pendulum can also be used. An 11 year old coming up with an actual, useful and proven device is wonderful. He may have had an interest in earthquake detection or many other legitimate pursuits.

  48. Re:WTF? by infosinger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Next, he'll invent a bomb that doesn't look like a science project.

    My friends and I used to carry our BB guns around the suburban neighborhood. By today's standards we would be considered, if not terrorists, at least in serious needs of counseling and immediate suspension from school.

  49. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Im not sure which is worse, the fact the school is so fucking full of idiots they would just see a kid with a plastic bottle and call the police or that they would suggest the kid and his family get counseling because the kid showed some sign of independant thought and intelligence.

  50. What if it was really a wolf? by Haeleth · · Score: 1

    Let us say it was really a wolf. Then the very same villagers would be all over the shepherd boy. "What? There was this wolf! With claws! And teeth! And the clueless boy didn't cry wolf. When is he going to learn that wild animals are constantly attacking our herds."

    Yes, that boy better keep crying wolf if he wants to be certain that people will rush to help him when a real wolf shows up.

  51. A lazy post by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The real problem is lawsuits. If the school officials get it wrong (and lets face it school kids HAVE attacked their school in the past) then they are sued, so nobody plays it safe anymore.

    One of the reason the US medical bill is through the roof is that because if a patient demands X procedure while the doctor knows it is silly, he gets it, because else he might sue.

    Say you are a station attendant and see a bag that seems to have been left behind. In the "real" world, you take a look, the changes of it being a bomb are remote and even if it is, bombs rarely explode just by looking. BUT what if you can be sued if you get it wrong? Loose not just your life (and nobody thinks they are going to die) but every thing you own? (Silly? Count the doctors that smoke or drink or drive without a seatbelt but do have malpractice insurance.)

    If you are sued for millions if you don't follow the book, you follow the book. And if you don't you loose your insurance and the first court case could bankrupt you.

    Calling the people involved stupid is the easy lazy answer. The real problem is the sue happy culture of the US, where any slightest mistake anyone not following the rule book to the letter can be sued for millions. If I saw an American have a heart attack, I would let them die. I could be sued for breaking a rib while saving their lives. No thanks.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:A lazy post by gbutler69 · · Score: 0, Troll

      The real problem is lawsuits. If the school officials get it wrong (and lets face it school kids HAVE attacked their school in the past) then they are sued, so nobody plays it safe anymore.

      Citation Please?

      One of the reason the US medical bill is through the roof is that because if a patient demands X procedure while the doctor knows it is silly, he gets it, because else he might sue.

      Your Proof (aka "Citation Please")

      Calling the people involved stupid is the easy lazy answer.

      Where the stupidity comes in, is that even after they've determined that it was not a bomb, and was, in fact, a perfectly legitimate, creative, and somewhat sophisticated "SCIENCE FAIR PROJECT", that was COMPLETELY SAFE, they still have the absolutle stupidity and GAUL to recommend that he and his family GET COUNSELING! For that alone, the prinicipal, the schoolboard, and anyone else who is supporting that recommendation, up to and including any politicians or police officials, should immediately LOSE THEIR FUCKING JOB and if anything, they should be the ones getting counseling (preferrably by getting ASS RAPED in Prison by the Black Panthers!)

      --
      Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
    2. Re:A lazy post by Darkness404 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If the school officials get it wrong (and lets face it school kids HAVE attacked their school in the past)

      Yeah, because we all know all those stories about 11 year olds saying "Hey, I've got a cool science fair project" and it turning out to be a bomb. Yeah, those are some really common stories... Do kids sometimes attack their school? Yes, but with guns or concealed, rudimentary "bombs".

      One of the reason the US medical bill is through the roof is that because if a patient demands X procedure while the doctor knows it is silly, he gets it, because else he might sue.

      I take it you have never had a doctor who doesn't know his stuff do you? There are a lot of doctors who simply refuse to listen to their patient's complaints, many times leading to complications.

      And as for the US medical bill, who pays it? The people who request to have it done. (Or at least they should) Meaning, who cares if Joe Sixpack demands 9 knee surgeries, Joe Sixpack or his insurance company is paying for them, not you.

      BUT what if you can be sued if you get it wrong? Loose not just your life (and nobody thinks they are going to die) but every thing you own? (Silly? Count the doctors that smoke or drink or drive without a seatbelt but do have malpractice insurance.)

      Because we all know of those many, many, many things that have happened A) In schools B) From an 11 year old C) with the 11 year old showing off their project. D) In the USA

      There is a difference of someone finding a dropped bottle that looked like it, or finding it in possession of a student who won't explain what it is, and a fully cooperative 11 year old. This isn't Israel, it is California, terrorist and other attacks are so rare that they should hardly be considered.

      As for the doctors, how many of them really have to -themselves- get malpractice insurance? Most of the time they tell someone else, "Hey I need some insurance" they do the research and come up with a plan, the doctor says "Hey, this sounds good" and signs the paperwork. As for smoking, a lot of them know that it is bad, but see the risk/reward benefit as being in their favor. As for drinking, a moderate amount of drinking isn't going to be a health risk and may actually be a health benefit. While going home drunk from a bar or party every single night isn't going to be good at all for your health, having a glass of wine with dinner, or the occasional beer isn't going to be a health risk. And many doctors who drive without a seatbelt do it in habit. While some of us who are younger can't remember a time when you -didn't- wear your seatbelt, a lot of doctors are from older generations where you simply just didn't wear your seatbelt.

      If you are sued for millions if you don't follow the book, you follow the book. And if you don't you loose your insurance and the first court case could bankrupt you.

      You -could- be sued for millions, if it -is- a bomb, which -did- go off, which -did- cause a loss of life or injury, etc. You know, I -could- be checking my mail and I -could- be run over by a car and I -could- sustain massive internal injuries which -could- kill me, yet I know the risk of that is very small. Its even smaller that an 11 year old child has a bomb, that would go off, that would cause injuries, that would get you sue and you would lose.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    3. Re:A lazy post by budgenator · · Score: 1

      After the psychological trauma of having to deal with the police and the Metro Arson Strike Team, at a tender middle school age, then having your home and sanctuary violated by a search for hazardous substances, counseling probably isn't a bad idea. If the kid can McGyver a motion detector out of a pop bottle and surplus electronics, he can play this up for $Millions.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    4. Re:A lazy post by LurkerXD · · Score: 1

      I could be sued for breaking a rib while saving their lives.

      Have to call shenanigans on this one... My CPR instructor actually directly stated 1. This probably can and will happen, and 2. You can't get sued unless the person in question dies, even if you aren't certified or whatnot, due to there being "Good Samaritan Laws" - read, this guy just saved your ass, stop whining about it.

  52. Just ask the god damned science teacher. by aussersterne · · Score: 1, Insightful

    No need to involve the student. This isn't a kid prodigy building an atomic reactor; the device sounds (and likely was) simple in composition and principle. Just turn to the science teacher and say "That's not a bomb, is it?" and the science teacher will respond with "Oh, no, it's a simple little device for detecting motion made out of a plastic bottle, quite ingenious really, especially at this kid's grade level, gave it an 'A'."

    And that would be that.

    This principal ought to be then stripped in public, beaten senseless with a cane, then tarred, then feathered, then made fun of by an entire class of pointing science fair students.

    And then they ought to be fired.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    1. Re:Just ask the god damned science teacher. by coolgeek · · Score: 1

      Yeah, or even just ask the teachers over the intercom if they know of any side projects the student might be working on.

      --

      cat /dev/null >sig
    2. Re:Just ask the god damned science teacher. by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      And then they ought to be fired.

      Out of a cannon.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  53. DARPA "not enough geeks" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just a few days ago I read an article about DARPA complaining that not enough students were taking science degrees. Now we see why! Here is a principal at a tech magnet school, seriously unqualified, that cannot discriminate a simple electronic device from a bomb. The real question is exactly who hired this incompetent idiot to administer students that are obviously smarter them himself and the HR person. Instead of panicking and calling 911 he might have called one of the science teachers first. But no, he went into chicken little mode and assumed that Armageddon was at hand.

  54. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    woosh...
    I'm pretty sure that's what the OP was implying

  55. Oh please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a public school for god's sake, it's going to be CYA all the way now.

    If you want intelligent interaction talk to librarians, not school administrators.

    1. Re:Oh please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God no, librarians are the worst. They have a grudge against technology because it has made their 'study skills' obselete. The school librarian is always pacing behind student terminals looking for suspicious websites and icons that 'look like EXEs'.

  56. Protest To The School by jlb.think · · Score: 5, Informative

    What we should all do is send letters of protest to the school. I have just written them asking them to apologize to the student and his family. I have suggested that the vice principal in question should be counseled on the proper way to react in such a situation. I know the chances of the school issuing an apology is low, but enough of public pressure will eventually force them to. And anyone who lives near this school should be their for the next board meeting to protest what has been done. You can contact them here: http://www.mtechmiddle.org/apps/contact/

    1. Re:Protest To The School by coastal984 · · Score: 1

      Great idea. Sent my message. Reminded them that if they are a Technology Magnet School, they should be encouraging this student and others like him, not counseling him!

    2. Re:Protest To The School by SpaceCadets · · Score: 1

      I simply sent them a message linking this story, with Attn: PR Department. Simple, doubt it will be effective.

  57. Here's some counseling by haruchai · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Kid, keep up the good work, and move to a school with smarter officials.

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  58. The true irony is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    that the article states the middle school "emphasizes technology skills".

    And people wonder why science and technology are on the decline in the US.

  59. What you say?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Someone set us up the bomb!!!

    We get signal!!!

    How are you idiots??? All your sense are belong to us!!!

    1. Re:What you say?!?! by SilasMortimer · · Score: 1

      Your comment just broke Slashdot. All other comments will pale in comparison. I hope you're happy, you insensitive clod.

      --
      Omnes tuae crepidines sunt nobis sunt. Ascendo tuum!
  60. At my daughters school... by gbutler69 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...they send home a "Rules and Policies" that must be signed by the Parents and the Student. I cross-out any ambiguous and ill-defined sections, initial them, then sign the document.

    --
    Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
    1. Re:At my daughters school... by gbutler69 · · Score: 1

      Oh, and I keep a copy for myself as well.

      --
      Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
    2. Re:At my daughters school... by deniable · · Score: 1

      Better yet, get the kids to do some research. Margin notes including 'unconstitutional, illogical, anatomically impossible, and "english, please"' would be a starting point.

  61. Re:WTF? by Lorens · · Score: 1

    next time the project won't just look like a bomb

    Even if it is one...

    No, especially if it is one: "If you make a bomb, make sure it doesn't look like one, and don't show it to your friends before setting it off." That 11 year-old and a lot of his friends will certainly have learned that lesson, but I must admit I'm surprised at the school's curriculum.

  62. Counseling? by Vegeta99 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Counseling for what? The trauma of being accused of being a bomber? I hope that's what it is, and not the fact that the kid has a hobby and was showing it off to kids.

    When I was in middle school, the school got evacuated because of a kid with a CD player in his locker. It was on pause, and the CD was in kinda crooked, making a faint ticking sound. They definitely didn't even bother to ask the kid, because he was in the same class as me (gym, mind you, so we were stuck standing outside in shorts in 30F weather. And no, sonny, walking to your house across the street is NOT okay), and got hauled off by the cops.

    In the same middle school, I pretty much was all the teachers' techie. As a result, I had the admin password to all the classroom computers. My last year there I was suspended for knowing the password (even though the teachers tried to defend me).

    Really think I'll be homeschooling my own children. Had I been this kid's dad, I'd have popped that vice principal square in the teeth.

  63. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  64. John Talyor Gatto: A Conspiracy Against Ourselves by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 4, Insightful

    An excerpt from "The Underground History of American Education":
    http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/chapters/16a.htm
    """
    Solve this problem and school will heal itself: children know that schooling is not fair, not honest, not driven by integrity. They know they are devalued in classes and grades, that the institution is indifferent to them as individuals. The rhetoric of caring contradicts what school procedure and content say, that many children have no tolerable future and most have a sharply proscribed one. The problem is structural. School has been built to serve a society of associations: corporations, institutions, and agencies. Kids know this instinctively. How should they feel about it? How should we?

    As soon as you break free of the orbit of received wisdom you have little trouble figuring out why, in the nature of things, government schools and those private schools which imitate the government model have to make most children dumb, allowing only a few to escape the trap. The problem stems from the structure of our economy and social organization. When you start with such pyramid-shaped givens and then ask yourself what kind of schooling they would require to maintain themselves, any mystery dissipates--these things are inhuman conspiracies all right, but not conspiracies of people against people, although circumstances make them appear so. School is a conflict pitting the needs of social machinery against the needs of the human spirit. It is a war of mechanism against flesh and blood, self-maintaining social mechanisms that only require human architects to get launched.

    I'll bring this down to earth. Try to see that an intricately subordinated industrial/commercial system has only limited use for hundreds of millions of self-reliant, resourceful readers and critical thinkers. In an egalitarian, entrepreneurially based economy of confederated families like the one the Amish have or the Mondragon folk in the Basque region of Spain, any number of self-reliant people can be accommodated usefully, but not in a concentrated command-type economy like our own. Where on earth would they fit? In a great fanfare of moral fervor some years back, the Ford Motor Company opened the world's most productive auto engine plant in Chihuahua, Mexico. It insisted on hiring employees with 50 percent more school training than the Mexican norm of six years, but as time passed Ford removed its requirements and began to hire school dropouts, training them quite well in four to twelve weeks. The hype that education is essential to robot-like work was quietly abandoned. Our economy has no adequate outlet of expression for its artists, dancers, poets, painters, farmers, filmmakers, wildcat business people, handcraft workers, whiskey makers, intellectuals, or a thousand other useful human enterprises--no outlet except corporate work or fringe slots on the periphery of things. Unless you do "creative" work the company way, you run afoul of a host of laws and regulations put on the books to control the dangerous products of imagination which can never be safely tolerated by a centralized command system.

    Before you can reach a point of effectiveness in defending your own children or your principles against the assault of blind social machinery, you have to stop conspiring against yourself by attempting to negotiate with a set of abstract principles and rules which, by its nature, cannot respond. Under all its disguises, that is what institutional schooling is, an abstraction which has escaped its handlers. Nobody can reform it. First you have to realize that human values are the stuff of madness to a system; in systems-logic the schools we have are already the schools the system needs; the only way they could be much improved is to have kids eat, sleep, live, and die there.

    Schools got the way they were at the start of the twentieth century as part of a vast, intensely engineered social revolution in which all major institutions were overhauled to wo

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  65. Principal should be fired for stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This is a prime example of shifting responsibility or blame. The principal had the opportunity to get an explanation from the student and react rationally. He or she choose to push the panic button to pass off any decision making that could cause questions later by other idiot politically correct over reactionary people. So what do we see after all this? We see the principal do the usual dodge that those in positions of authority always do. He successfully pushed the blame over to this poor 11 year old student for this mess of over reaction the principal actually created. This is so typical of the problems we have today where those in a position of responsibility manage to pass the blame for being stupid onto some poor sap less able to defend themselves. This poor 11yr. old student had no real chance to defend himself from this and and it seems that it was agreed the best way to protect the authority of the school was to blame the kid for everything. It would seem his parents are less than capable in taking on the establishment to right this wrong than you would hope. This would be so wrong if this was a rational world. Unfortunately once again, we see it isn't.

  66. Now I understand! by Belial6 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now I understand! This is the 'socialization' that the home schooled kids are missing!

    1. Re:Now I understand! by anyGould · · Score: 1

      Oddly, this is true. While it's quite the cluster from an academic view, from the social view the kid's probably a hero. He built something cool *and* got them out of class for a few hours *and* made the teachers look stupid. In my school that was pretty much the trifecta, right there.

  67. Who appointed that vice-principal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can anyone appoint such a moron as a vice principal ?

    Is there no aim for excellence in education no more ?

    How is America going to compete against the world with morons like that in the school system ?

    1. Re:Who appointed that vice-principal? by alanshot · · Score: 1

      How can anyone appoint such a moron as a vice principal ?

      In order to get his stupid ass out of the classroom where he was doing damage to the kids daily.

      I have seen this in business alot. If you cant fire the person for some reason you simply elevate them "out of reach" so they dont mess things up.

      For example, the owner's nephew is lousy at sales and customer service and is alienating key customers. So you simply promote him to VP of teacups and cozies, thus removing him from any customer interaction. Problem solved! (somewhat)

  68. Got away with one this time sonny ... by gordguide · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    From TFA:
    " ... "There will be no (criminal) charges whatsoever," Luque said. ..."
    " ... Students were evacuated from Millennial Tech Magnet Middle School in the Chollas View neighborhood Friday afternoon after an 11-year-old student ..."

    That's right. Criminal charges against an 11-year old.

    As it turns out, California has no Minimum Age for Criminal Responsibility (MACR), so if they wanted to, they could have brought charges against the student.

  69. "public display of affection"?... by sznupi · · Score: 1

    Now that;s interestingly ambitious.

    I assume teachers aren't allowed to wear wedding rings? They are, after all, a public display of affections to whoever they are married with...

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
  70. A sad day for the future.. by malkavian · · Score: 1

    Back when I was a kid (in the 70s), half the fun of life (being a geek, even back then) was playing with electronics, chemistry and whatever came to hand.. I make all kinds of things that went bang quite effectively, made funny coloured smoke, and had wires coming from all angles. In my secondary school (in the 80s), my teachers would actually take an interest in the weird things I'd created, and made suggestions on doing it better.. This nurtured my creative side quite nicely.. I still get the soldering iron out now and then if I need devices that aren't generally available, but I'm capable of making myself..
    This approach still holds true in China, Russia, and really most of the countries out there apart from US/UK and a few of the other Western countries.. This means they're getting better scope to broaden their horizons and invent from an early age. Given a broader scope of inventive populace, and a greater comfort with the learning, methinks it's only a matter of time until we legislate and worry ourselves into being second rate nations due to lack of the next bright and creative generation..

    1. Re:A sad day for the future.. by kklein · · Score: 1

      This approach still holds true in China, Russia...

      I agree with the spirit of what you've written but...

      [citation needed]

  71. US Schools by phorm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Has anyone heard of this sort of thing commonly occurring outside of US schools?
    I don't want to sound like a self-righteous Canadian, but I've worked in three school districts and I really don't see that kind of fear-of-technology/intelligence happening here. I do see teachers that aren't great with technology, but I haven't met anyone that is outright paranoid like those in these type of stories (which seem to be rather frequent over the last few years).

    So does anyone in Canada/Europe/Australia/Asia/etc have similar stories, or is there something really, really weird with the US Education system?

    1. Re:US Schools by thephydes · · Score: 1

      In a word - NO I've been a teacher in OZ for 28 years and have never heard anything that approaches this level of paranoia. Mind you, organisationally we are very different. State or "independent - eg Catholic, Anglican etc etc" ..... no such thing as a school district that is totally independent of the one geographically next to it.

    2. Re:US Schools by SilasMortimer · · Score: 1

      It's not just the educational system, it's our society.

      There is a large contingent of Americans who fear what they might call, if they're honest, over-education. Institutions of higher learning are often believed to be indoctrinating (or "brainwashing", as they put it) students to be unpatriotic, often citing the teaching of evolution as being anathema to the morals of society. The term "educated fools" is common among the poorer population. Human rights are generally only important in regards to "people like you", while the extension of it especially to minority groups is seen as some sort of infringement. Combine this with fear of said minority groups and anyone else considered an "outsider", and it's only natural that this extends to the public schools.

      This is what makes our educational system an overall failure.

      --
      Omnes tuae crepidines sunt nobis sunt. Ascendo tuum!
  72. Recovering costs by jmv · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Police and fire officials also will not seek to recover costs associated with responding to the incident, the spokesman said.

    Translation: We realize we screwed up and don't want to be laughed at in court.

  73. The Principle and all involved by gearloos · · Score: 2, Informative

    Someone please find these asshats emails and post them here ! 2 million emails jamming the local system should help get the point across although it will probably just make the poor admins life miserable. !We really need to get rid of clowns like these (the school authorities involved). It is a constant irritation that they are "not filing charges". THEY (the school authorities involved) should be charged and it should be dam serious enough to make them think about throwing a families life into disarray the next time. As for local police, well you can't fix stupid.

    --
    "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
    1. Re:The Principle and all involved by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 1

      "As for local police, well you can't fix stupid"

      -The police did EXACTLY what they are supposed to do. When the police are told of a possible bomb threat, they have to treat it as if the 'bomb' is real. In this case, the Principal is the one who told them it was a bomb. Seeing as he is the Principal of a school that, ironically, emphasizes science and technology, he should definitely be fired.

      --
      Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
    2. Re:The Principle and all involved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vice Principals: Mr. Willie Neil and Ms. Heather Potter

      HTH

    3. Re:The Principle and all involved by stellarcode · · Score: 1

      Actually Mr. Willie Neil is probably the culprit. You can contact him using the form here: http://www.mtechmiddle.org/apps/email/index.jsp?e=556355455527553555415453555555195545552555355417554555275557&n=Willie+Neil The reason I believe it is thus is because he does not appear on the school staff list, while Heather Potter does(albeit without the title vice principal) This change was recent as the page cache on google has not changed... Strike that - apparently google has pulled it down now too. LOLZ!

    4. Re:The Principle and all involved by stellarcode · · Score: 1

      My bad - you can still find it cached on google, but their site is conspicuously missing the info on Willie Neil.

  74. Wait, No Criminal Charges? by johnshirley · · Score: 1

    "There will be no (criminal) charges whatsoever," Luque said.

    But there should be some charges here. Alas, there's no Criminal Stupidity laws on the books that could be leveled at the vice principal.

  75. Don't Tread On Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I was at High School I was caught by one of the deans making black powder in a science lab. Instead of taking the opportunity to turn the incident in to a lesson in basic safety or chemistry this teacher went nuts. I remember the science teacher trying to step in and do the right thing. I was threatened with expulsion. My parents were called. I clearly remember him calling me amongst various things , 'A clear threat to society'. What I was actually interested in at the time was model rocketry not bomb making. But like any half smart 13 year old I was capable of both. I figured since had labeled me in his tiny mind as a threat the onus was on me to deliver his nightmare. The very next day this same teacher found under his chair in the teachers staff room exactly what he was afraid of. A plastic lunch box containing two steel pipes a stereo counter and some simple electronics to drive it all. It looked for all the world on first inspection like every bomb MacGyver has ever tried to diffuse. Until you looked closer and saw that the metal tubes were packed with tissue. I was told later that the teacher actually wet himself in the process of trying to diffuse it like the big hero that he was. In those days where I lived we did not have any special response unit for these things. He called the fire department. The whole school was ordered to line up outside on a series of tennis courts. In a strange way rather than confirming that he was right about me the incident merely confirmed that he was a complete idiot. I remember one of the Fireman walking past holding the lunch box and laughing. Anyway the point I was going to make was that if your going to label bright intelligent children as threats when they are merely exploring the world and not intent on hurting anyone then fully expect them to confirm your worst fears 10 times over and then some. I might also ad that this experience was the start for me of a long war of hatred with all forms of authority. Thankfully it was a war I won!

  76. Only the Very Best in Schooling Here by pgrady7 · · Score: 1

    The call to the police is what happens when you entrust the education of your children to a bunch of underachieving liberal arts majors. The extraordinarily poor journalism is yet another monument to the very best in liberal arts education. The only good thing to come of this: it will definitely push the obviously bright 11-year-old and his cohorts into the hard sciences and engineering. That's one mark for the good guys.

  77. I would have been sent to Guantanamo Bay by billybob_jcv · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If they treated kids like this in the 70's, I would have been declared a threat to the free world. I taught myself how to solder when I was 10, and I was into building all kinds of electronics kits and projects. I was also into model rocketry and built multi-stage rockets capable of reaching altitudes of 2500 ft. I brought crap to school to show my class all the time. Luckily, I didn't grow up to be an international terrorist - I became an engineer. We are in deep trouble when our education system treats the kids that should be leading us to the next technology leap forward as criminals.

    1. Re:I would have been sent to Guantanamo Bay by xyph0r · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I agree. I think they're going about it at entirely the wrong angle. Instead of stopping children from doing a particular activity (be it learning electronics, model rocketry, or even pyrotechnics) shouldn't we be encouraging their creativity and initiative? Instead of saying 'stop doing that, it's naughty', saying 'that's really cool. You could do that to help the world'?
      Maybe I'm naive, but I believe that if you were to encourage children in these activities, engage with them and let them know that you think they are doing something positive, they'd be less likely to use them for something bad. The world will always have religious fanatics, people who disagree with a state's ideologies and values, but by stifling childrens' initiative, the only thing you're doing is driving them away.

      --
      SQL programmer goes to a bar. Walks up to two tables and says 'Excuse me, may I join you?'.
    2. Re:I would have been sent to Guantanamo Bay by rgviza · · Score: 1

      No shit. I built a model rocket with my son. We went up to the park to send it up and did. Then I read a story about the ATF requiring a license for solid fuel model rockets after Sept 11. I'm not sure how that equates to terrorists flying a 747 into a building or why that should have prompted this licensing requirement.

      If I wanted to build a rocket-bomb, I wouldn't be getting a license for it. Conversely, if a terrorist wants to build one, he can just get a license.

      Had I been caught, at that time, I could have went to jail for doing the same thing my dad did with me when I was a kid. Luckily the NAR subsequently took the ATF to court over this and won last May http://www.space-rockets.com/arsanews.html#nolist, getting ACPC solid fuel off of the ATF's list.

      All is not lost. Some of this "anti-terrorism" legislation is getting beat down.

      --
      Don't kid yourself. It's the size of the regexp AND how you use it that counts.
  78. PARANOIA-The Destroya! by Newer+Guy · · Score: 0, Troll

    This has to end! Since 9/11, PARANOIA has completely taken over in the USA!! Al Quaida must be SO happy-as their terrorism has certainly succeeded FAR more then in their wildest dreams! The single best thing we could have done was give the third FINGER to Al Quaida, and gone about our normal business. But we STUPID Americans did not-and now we're a scared bunch of wussies for it!!!

  79. Are we stupid or something? by Tei · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    People has to build gadgets on his normal lifes. Everyone sould be allowed. If some guy mistake it for a bomb, is his mistake, not the creator of the artifact. The kid sould not be in any way demoralized by this.

    --

    -Woof woof woof!

  80. Re:Taking the same thing into airport likely will by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought it would too, but as an embedded developer, I've had to fly across the world carrying strange devices with wires and chips all over the place. Surprisingly it is rare that I get stopped and have to take it apart to show what it is. Usually when I do, I get the feeling that the security guards are more curious about what they are looking at than that they have any fear over it being a bomb. Maybe if I were Iranian or wore a turban I would get a different response, maybe I will try the turban thing sometime.

    --
    Qxe4
  81. Some doctors are assholes. by sconeu · · Score: 1

    One of the reason the US medical bill is through the roof is that because if a patient demands X procedure while the doctor knows it is silly, he gets it, because else he might sue.

    I take it you have never had a doctor who doesn't know his stuff do you? There are a lot of doctors who simply refuse to listen to their patient's complaints, many times leading to complications.

    This is true. About 10 years ago, I was diagnosed with pertussis (whooping cough). How? My daughter and I had had similar symptoms for about 4 months (mostly consisting of coughing up a lung). I told the doctor that my daughter had been diagnosed with pertussis and asked for the test. The asshole said, "Have you been vaccinated?" I said "Yes." He said, "You don't have it, then!". I had to threaten him to get the test, and sure enough it came back positive. Two weeks with the proper antibiotics, and my condition cleared up.

    Some doctors really are assholes.

    P.S. I know that the singular of data is not "anecdote".

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  82. the kid doesn't need counselling by alizard · · Score: 1, Insightful

    he and his family need to move to a country that values science over superstition and is in general, more sanely run than the USA.

    The principal and vice-principal of this allegedly "technical" high school should be fired and blacklisted, of course, but they'll probably get promoted instead.

  83. Ain't no terror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    War on Terror? What terror? More people are killed in a day in road accidents than are killed in a year in terrorist actions.

    No one should believe the government anymore.

    So much resource for ... nothing.

  84. Oh for the love of . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At some point we need to just teach people what a bomb actually looks like. It's not as if a bottle of Gatorade with wires sticking out of it looks like a bomb. Sure, if you see a stick of dynamite , fertilizer, or even just a lump of clay inside that those wires are attached too -- then that's suspicious. But at some point people need to realize that ELECTRONICS BY THEMSELVES do not just blow up. A circuit board and a wire are merely one component of an explosive device. There has to be something capable of exploding somewhere in the mix, and probably not just a tiny bit of something.

    We have this case, the ATHF litebrites, the shirt with lights on it at the airport, etc, etc. How hard is it to understand this: WIRES BY THEMSELVES DO NOT A BOMB MAKE. NO QUANTITY OF WIRES WILL TURN INTO A BOMB. Christ.

    Posting anonymously so I don't get arrested for knowing what a bomb should look like.

  85. The US Must be paranoid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About seven years ago in New Zealand one of my classmates made an actual setup to detonate
    C4 as part of a class project. He loaded the thing with play dough, a couple of flashing LEDs and
    a speaker.
    The teachers didn't seem to mind.

    Of course this was in a country school, hunting and blowing stuff up where both popular hobbies.

  86. Home Economics terror: Egg-timer mistaken as bomb by w0mprat · · Score: 1

    Not forgivable. This was an empty Gatorade bottle with some electronics attached. What did they suspect was in it? Highly combustible oxygen?

    What next, a kitchen egg timer could be mistaken as a bomb and a Home Economics class evacuated?

    Terrorism hysteria has turned into insanity. I will seriously be neither surprised when we hear more about everyday objects coming under suspicion. I'm waiting to hear about someone wearing adult incontinence diapers being stripped searched at an airport because they were suspected of having an underwear.

    Who really knows what a bomb looks like, except for the experts? Most people go off they've seen in the movies no doubt. In the realy world bombs don't have lots of red and blue wires with a red-led countdown timer that beeps every second. One would assume someone making a bomb would attempt to mask what it is. For example, shoe-bomber and underwear bombers.

    I might resist the practical joke I had in mind, duct taping an old cellphone and wires to a coke can and putting it on my co-workers desk.

    --
    After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
  87. Motion Detector? by florescent_beige · · Score: 1

    Doesn't anyone else wonder how the motion detector works?

    I'm thinking micro-changes in air density.

    --
    Equine Mammals Are Considerably Smaller
    1. Re:Motion Detector? by md65536 · · Score: 1

      Micro changes in air density, my ass.

  88. In other news . . . by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

    . . . a principal at another school suspends a student after suspecting the student was carrying a dangerous pointed weapon. Turns out it was a pen.

    --
    Can I bum a sig?
  89. Missing details by ehud42 · · Score: 1

    What did the kid say to the cops that made the cops pursue bomb disposal and authorities recommend family counseling?

    --
    I'm in my right mind and I have the answer to everything!
    1. Re:Missing details by Pranadevil2k · · Score: 1

      Probably "Oh, it works great! Just push the button, it's cool! ^_^"

    2. Re:Missing details by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 1

      I don't get the councelling bit neighter, the kid was clearly a bright student, and i don't see anything that could warrent councelling for creating something usefull like a motion detector

  90. You are a FUCKING IDIOT by omb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You and people like you are exactly why the situation in the USA gets ever worse.

    You are constantly obsessed with un-real threats, fixing problems that don't exist, and simply a GENERAL denial of common sense, justified on stupid rules and panicky process. Eg TSA ...

    This kid was VICTIMIZED, should sue the vice-principle, inter alia, for slander of reputation (in his trade of profession, as a school student) and for distress and the suit should enjoin the school Board, and the County. His parents should have at least one with balls.

    He is entitles to an APOLOGY, DAMAGES, and full reparation of his REPUTATION, and equal publicity, if necessary paid for by the Board, and since the costs were vicarious should be sanctioned across the Board members by a levy.

    1. Re:You are a FUCKING IDIOT by phantomfive · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Wow. You seem really emotional about this point. You should calm down, it's really not that big of a deal.

      --
      Qxe4
    2. Re:You are a FUCKING IDIOT by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You should calm down, it's really not that big of a deal.

      You should wake up. It is a very big deal. This child was harmed (to what degree, only a psych eval could fully determine) by those who are in loco parentis and charged with his well-being. That assistant principal abrogated his responsibilities, and should certainly be removed from any position of authority over the students. I agree 100% with the GP: at the very least that prick should have to stand up in front of the entire student body and apologize to the student. Won't happen here, of course, but in a just world it most certainly would.

      Some redress is in order. I haven't been that young since the sixties, but if it had happened to me, believe me, my family would have made damn sure there were consequences to that school and the arrogant fools who apparently "administer" it. You really need to acquire a little empathy for the kid: he suffered a terrifying experience through no fault of his own whatsoever, at the hands of someone who would better serve the school by slapping burgers in the lunchroom. You think that boy is going to walk away from this unscathed?

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:You are a FUCKING IDIOT by MPAB · · Score: 1

      I had the same happen to me in medical school. A doctor I was making a database for had left his webmail open and some gossipy students found a proof of infidelity, which they forwarded to the victim (leaving a trace in the server). I was blamed for that because "He knows about computers, so he must have broken into the account for sure". My parents gave me no support whatsoever and I had to solve the case on my own to prove innocent. Still, I felt afraid to make a fuss about it and didn't even get an apology.

    4. Re:You are a FUCKING IDIOT by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      The only person needing counseling seems to be the vice-principal.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    5. Re:You are a FUCKING IDIOT by alanshot · · Score: 1

      Some redress is in order. I haven't been that young since the sixties, but if it had happened to me, believe me, my family would have made damn sure there were consequences to that school and the arrogant fools who apparently "administer" it. You really need to acquire a little empathy for the kid: he suffered a terrifying experience through no fault of his own whatsoever, at the hands of someone who would better serve the school by slapping burgers in the lunchroom. You think that boy is going to walk away from this unscathed?

      Why do you think they are recommending counseling? Its because the school seriously F'd up and now they have scarred the poor kid.

      So its not "youre a menace to society" type of counselling, but instead "You just saw your entire family slaughtered with a hatched before your eyes" type of counselling.

    6. Re:You are a FUCKING IDIOT by Salus+Victus · · Score: 1

      "This child was harmed (to what degree, only a psych eval could fully determine) by those who are in loco parentis and charged with his well-being."

      Maybe someone should recommend counselling for the little guy?

      --
      In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there's a big difference.
    7. Re:You are a FUCKING IDIOT by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      This kid was VICTIMIZED, should sue the vice-principle, inter alia, for slander of reputation (in his trade of profession, as a school student) and for distress and the suit should enjoin the school Board, and the County. His parents should have at least one with balls.

      He is entitles to an APOLOGY, DAMAGES, and full reparation of his REPUTATION

      YOU'RE the one who SOUNDS like a FUCKING IDIOT to ME.
      The threat of ridiculou lawsuits is one of the most annoying things about the US to an outsider.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  91. Re:If you REALLY want to let them know what you th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Most of the teachers probably rolled their eyes at the moron. The 'upper' staff is usually buddies of someone who knows someone. You do not get that job by actually by being good at it. Those upper jobs are a 'scratch my back' sort of cushy job. Rich donating old lady to supper of the schools... "Hey can you give my nephew a good job he isnt too good at anything" sort of job...

    Most politics in the united states works this way. It is rarely about doing the right thing and about what lobbyist is screaming the loudest at the moment and who paid the most in campaign contributions.

    To give you an idea how this works my uncle who owed a good sum of money to the "tax guys" told me this little gem "get in trouble with the IRS and you can make the problem go away with a 5k 'campaign' contribution to your local congress critter". His 'tax problem' went away. Its not a 'bribe' per se but it sure looks like one to me. You would be shocked to see how often this happens. Especially on the state level.

  92. Re:Home Economics terror: Egg-timer mistaken as bo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What did they suspect was in it? Highly combustible oxygen?

    They suspected it might contain nitrogen, which can be used by terrorists to make ammonium nitrate.

  93. In defense of Dylan Klebold by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2, Informative

    They may have students a lot like Dylan Klebold in their school, and don't know how to ensure that they don't go off the deep end, so they do the best they can.

    Forensic analysis of the massacre concluded that it was orchestrated by Eric Harris, who was a clinical psychopath. Dylan Klebold was just a maladjusted doofus that Harris took along for the ride.

    1. Re:In defense of Dylan Klebold by Surt · · Score: 1

      Yeahhhh ... but Eric Harris is such a nice sounding name. You can't really believe an analysis that concludes he was the problem. Obviously it must have been the Klebold. That's only a few letters off from being a Hitler.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    2. Re:In defense of Dylan Klebold by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      Forensic analysis of the massacre concluded that it was orchestrated by Eric Harris, who was a clinical psychopath. Dylan Klebold was just a maladjusted doofus that Harris took along for the ride.

      [citation needed]

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    3. Re:In defense of Dylan Klebold by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that such "massacres" are in fact loud, messy SUICIDES: "On my way out, I'll show the world just how much they hurt me, and hurt them back just as much".

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  94. Immoral by omb · · Score: 1

    No I wouldn't, what you suggest is both stupid and immoral, demand a jury trial, go in the box and say "I did my best" you are so infested by dishonest lawyers and dumbkopfen that you cannot see the clearly 'The morally correct path'.

    Since you don't pay 'costs in cause' in the USA there is no downside to bringing unjustified suit.

  95. Smarter than the teachers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are soooo right and I am soooo glad. It gives me some hope for the future.

    On the other hand, I have a sister-in-law who teaches special education (learning disable and emotionally behaviorally disturbed) at a middle school (~11-14 year olds) One of her kids brought an UZ to school one day to impress his friends or bullies. Probably illegal and a violation of school policy. I don't think that that school was know for its technology program though. I hope the vice-principal gets counselling it sure seems like a teachable moment for him, even if he did exactly the right thing.

  96. Similar thing happened to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Back in early high school (2002 maybe?) I almost got suspended for something similar. I had built some sort of analog-based electronic musical instrument on a breadboard for a class.

    During the early stages of construction I put a small electrolytic cap on backwards. A few minutes after hooking everything up the capacitor blew with a loud snap. They thought I had built a bomb and questioned if I had used gunpowder and explosives and all kinds of crap. In the end nothing came of it, but I spent a few days in the principal's office and for after-school counseling (which I remember more as after-school interrogation to get me to say I had used gunpowder).

  97. morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    School principal, FAIL. Fucking moron. I had the FBI called on me in 10th grade in 74 for doing the math to calculate the critical mass of U235

  98. More parents now send their kids overseas... by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

    ... for K-12 education for exactly this reason.

  99. I'll tell you what's "empty" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Luque said the project was made of an empty half-liter Gatorade bottle with some wires and other electrical components attached. There was no substance inside."

    How in the !#$!#$! could a bomb consist of an *empty* container? What, was the plastic bottle the explosive? The electronic components? What?

    What's empty is the head of the morons that thought the thing was dangerous, and thus put this student, his family, and the whole school through this ordeal when some COMMON SENSE could have told them there was nothing dangerous.

    And what kind of message does this event send? Don't ever, ever play with wires, electronic components and bottles -- dangerous! Might be mistaken for a bomb!

  100. Found it! by bobv-pillars-net · · Score: 1

    The kid violated school policies

    No he didn't... the school policies are here:

    You obviously don't read very well. It took me about ten seconds to spot the violation:

    ACADEMIC HONESTY POLICY ... students shall not engage in ... alteration of materials or equipment.

    Clearly, the student is guilty of altering materials (wires and glue) and equipment (Gatorade bottle and electronics) and should be thoroughly counseled to avoid future infractions.

    --
    The Web is like Usenet, but
    the elephants are untrained.
  101. My God...what as happened to this country? by ChrisM510 · · Score: 1

    This makes me SICK...absolutey SICK! There REALLY is no hope for America if THIS is a random sample example of our educators today... Gee, thanks, Mr. Vice Principal...you may have just scared off another Abert Einstein or Stephen Hawking by your Neanderthal approach to academics... Life really is survival of the fittest, and I think I hear America's fat lady singing... Shame on you...

  102. Found it by bobv-pillars-net · · Score: 1
    --
    The Web is like Usenet, but
    the elephants are untrained.
  103. The principal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Principal has no principles! Hes an idiot, a moron, someone who never ever participated in a science project. I have a whole household of empty old containers with wires sticking out. A gatorade bottle is excellent as an electronics case: its dry when empty, lightweight, probably see-through, so that you can actually see no explosive materials inside.... Its an electronics project for a science fair. There is scientific stuff inside. I hate to call the principal a mentally challenged fucktard, I hate to use the Bart Simpson word "Craptacular" when describing his actions, but sadly, its the most appropriate adjective for this situation. I'm very very disappointed. Its much like the US government arresting scientists doing work on biological contagens like anthrax 5 years ago. No they are not terrorists, stop treating them like they are. This is very much a case of being judge, jury and executioner without there being any crime. STOP IT, FUCKING STOP IT NOW!

  104. Overreacting by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    The people that overreact to shit like this almost certainly have too much time on their hands. I was working for HP. One of the computers in my cubicle was running an HP approved Linux distro, installed by HP personnel, and not reconfigured by me. It randomly cycled through screen savers, including the one that displayed messages from the fortune files. One of the fortune files was the Zippy the pinhead one that contained the quote "I want to kill everyone here with a cute, colorful hydrogen bomb!" Now imagine the reaction of their highly trained, skilled rent-a-cop upon seeing this at 3am while on rounds. And the overreaction of their security staff, assuming I must be a dangerous sociopath because this was on MY machine, and I am obviously responsible for anything displayed on my machine. The result -- I was suspended for a week until they straightened it out. With pay. I was on the critical path for our project, which means project delivery was delayed for a week due to these dick heads. One of my coworkers investigated and explained it to them (which was difficult, since they had recorded the quote incorrectly) and I finally got called back to work. Nope, they never apologized or admitted their mistake in any way, shape or form. And of course I spent that one week hiatus applying for better jobs, one of which came through about a month later.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  105. Re: correct by michaelbuddy · · Score: 1

    I read the policy page as well, interestingly absent was anything about weapons or electronics at all. But I found another example about why that school is retarded.

    This is a middle school right? Like 5th to 8th grade?

    Apparently you can't RIDE YOUR BIKE anywhere on the campus. It's not allowed because it could create an unsafe environment. And this is in sunny all year San Diego. Yeah right...

    Environment: .... " the following behaviors cannot occur:

    Skateboarding, Roller skating, or bike riding on campus

    Cell phone use before or afterschool

    Gum on the walk ways or on any campus furniture

    Vandalism – defacing of or damage to school or private property, including:

    --

    ...::----::...

    I am in no way affiliated with this sig.

  106. would.. of.. went... down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "would of went down" - so if the choice is between the inept school officials and you, I am really worried.

  107. Which policy? by Capt.Albatross · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They may think this is their justification: "Staff, parents, and students agree that we should follow guidelines for Socially Responsible Behavior during the school day and at all school sponsored events.Socially Responsible Behavior includes, but is not limited to..." (my italics) -- i.e. 'we can make up the rules after the event'. The speciousness of a supposed policy document containing this sort of language should be obvious to reasonable people, but I cannot say what position the law would take on it.

    The official statements appear to be trying to give the impression that the student was at fault, without actually saying, much less doing, anything that would get their sorry asses sued.

  108. Critical thinking. by sparkeyjames · · Score: 1

    All that for a photo detector. And in a school that prides itself on
    technology education. I find it laughable that a school that promotes
    areas of education that require a critical thought process has
    administrators that seem to be exempt from the same.
    Fear has taken over our educational system to the detriment of
    it's original purpose which is to educate our children not imprison
    them for 7 hours a day.

  109. Let me ask the scary question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you think an 11 year old who clearly has the brains to build something like this now and has been put through the trauma will feel like doing when he is a little older and has more brains and means to get other materials... Perhaps this was why the counseling was recommended... To make sure this boy's life is not forever altered for worse from this point on... Scary stuff.

    1. Re:Let me ask the scary question... by jimicus · · Score: 1

      What do you think an 11 year old who clearly has the brains to build something like this now and has been put through the trauma will feel like doing when he is a little older and has more brains and means to get other materials... Perhaps this was why the counseling was recommended... To make sure this boy's life is not forever altered for worse from this point on... Scary stuff.

      I doubt it. That would be tantamount to the people responsible saying "You've got a bright kid there and there's every possibility that our insane overreaction will scar him for life. Better get him some counselling."

      I think it's far more likely they meant "You've got a dangerous kid there".

  110. Maybe I overlook something critical here, but... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Ok, here's an 11 year old carrying a gatorade bottle filled with electronics and wires. Now, this may be suspicious, after all, why should an 11 year old carry a Gatorade bottle filled with electronics and wires. If, yes if, it was not time to hand in his friggin' science project! What's the principal going to do when they have a science fair? Evacuate the school and blow the whole crap up just to be sure because the assembly place is filled with funky looking items?

    Or was it one of those really prissy schools where you'd expect your kids to come with rapid-prototyped shell for their projects and someone housing it in a Gatorade bottle is looking suspiciously poor? What the fuck did he expect the science project to be? Another potatoe-battery?

    That kid should get an award for coming up with that idea (ok, provided his parents didn't really do the work, but let's assume the best here). 11 year old builds a motion detector in a Gatorade bottle, that's genius! Instead now he'll probably think he did something bad, toss the whole science crap and follow the teenage dream: Become the next American Idol.

    Great. Effing great. Good job America, again you managed to punish someone for trying to be anything but an utter moron.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  111. WTF Over? by ikeman32 · · Score: 1

    Have we really deteriorated to the point where a supposedly educated person believes that an 11 year old has the intelligence to safely make a bomb? I know we got some pretty smart kids out their but with the state of the American education system get real. That vice-principal is the one that needs counseling or at the very least put in the corner with a dunce cap on. MORON!

  112. Counseling? What for? by fadir · · Score: 1

    After all this is a science school, isn't it? So the boy needs counseling for doing what the very purpose the school got built for?

    Are there any sane people left over there or has everyone turned manic and totally crazy already? I would really like to visit the U.S. one day but I'm dead scared, not of terrorists but to get snatched by some officials because I wear the wrong colored t-shirt or the like.

  113. Chainsaw in Locker by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 1

    I found a chainsaw in the garbage on the way to school. Being the collector/fixer that I am, I grabbed the chainsaw and took it to school with me. My friends made jokes. None of the staff even batted an eye as a 14-year-old nonchalantly carried a chainsaw to his locker. I fixed the saw the next day in auto shop. And for the next 7 months, a fueled up and ready-to-go chainsaw sat in my locker because my mom would freak out if I brought home more "junk". A friend got on to a school bus with a rifle. It was seized solid, and wouldn't have fired at all. He walked right into the school with it. AFAIK, nobody freaked on him. It was to be used as a prop for the school play. Dave now has a PhD. Columbine really changed things.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  114. Electronics = weird and scary by md65536 · · Score: 1

    Cuz like... electronics can explode or something. Used to be you needed explosive materials to make a bomb, but they miniaturized and modernized and now you can do that with a chip.

    This one time, my son opened up the VCR and I was SHOCKED to see that it was full of bombs! Just like in 24 or CSI or something. I called the police on him.

    Anyway the bomb experts say no it wasn't bombs, it was just electronics. Still. Pretty scary.

  115. Re:A lazy response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I call your response "a lazy response to a lazy post", because it seems that you were too lazy to proofread it.

    and lets face it school

    "and, let's face it, school".

    nobody plays it safe

    "everybody" (if you meant what I think you meant).

    One of the reason

    "reasons".

    the US medical bill

    "U.S. medical costs", maybe?

    is that because if

    "is that if" or "is because if".
     
    ... and so on, and so on.
    Also, "lose" is spelled with one "o".

  116. What Bullshit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... the following behaviors cannot occur: ... Cell phone use before or afterschool

    What gives them the right or ability to enforce what students do outside of the school building? FCC permit for jamming equipment? Consider for a moment that you're not god, bastards.

  117. This IS a tech school, right? by Restil · · Score: 1

    I understand the issues at hande, I would expect your garden variety administrator might not be able to differentiate between a motion sensor and a bomb. The general masses don't always have a firm grasp on technology. I deal with this all the time. A person has no problem believing that there is this huge network, with millions, even billions of computers that spans the entire planet, connected by copper wires, fiber optics, and even satellite. This amazingly complex contraption can allow them to hold a live conversation with both audio and video with a person on the other side of the planet, and it won't cost them a thing. They download a whole CD of music or a movie in a matter of minutes. All of this is easily believable. However, a computer controlled lightswitch is CLEARLY fake, as there's NO possible way to do that.

    I don't doubt that your average school administrator might suffer from the same technological myopia. They know what a stereo, TV , computer, flashlight, and cellphone look like. But get outside of that comfort zone and present them with an uncovered circuit board and some loose wires.... well.. that looks like a bomb, and they will react accordingly. This in and of itself is not surprising. What IS surprising is the fact that we're talking about a tech school here. You would assume that the bar would be set slightly higher in this circumstance. Enough to assume that those who teach and administrate at the school had at least an introductory electronics course at SOME point. One would assume anyway.

    -Restil

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
  118. To be fair to the police .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The student WAS wearing an ATHF shirt.

  119. That begs the question... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    So, you're suggesting we give them flack then, right? I know you're not suggesting that we should cut the officials some slack for reacting in the most odiously officious manner is logical because of the lack of negative response.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  120. Google for it by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    it has happened. And just the cost of defending myself could bankrupt me.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  121. So what grade do you suppose.... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    he got for the project?

    For a motion detector it sure created a lot of motion.
    Or did his project bomb?

  122. Nope: you said it, you define it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope: you said it, you define it. "But it was someone else!!!" is no explanation when YOU are the one who called it crazy lookin. Especially in this case since the one you want the grandparent poster to go to never said that.

    But I guess when you're shoving your head up your arse as hard as you can, you want to get people to look somewhere else when they ask you "why?".

  123. Death of freedom by Captain_Chaos · · Score: 1
    I visited the US last month, and I came to the sad conclusion that it is in fact no longer a free country...

    The terrorists have already won.

  124. I guess I must give a lot of people right here ... by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    That terrorists are already dominating our lives, our kids and our future.

    It's what they are best in ... "TERROR" ... Look at this reaction and see people freightened in terror ..

    And governments are "fixing" it by the most wrong means possible .. it's madness.

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  125. Charge the person! by cdn-programmer · · Score: 1

    How is this different than the idjots who called 911 and claimed their kid had been lofted above in a beautiful silver balloon? They are doing time. So should this jerk. Its public mischief.

    Of course up here in Canada we try to laugh this stuff off.

    Years ago we were in the news. One of our people took a handful of flour and tossed it on the bottom of a power pole. This is something we've been doing around the world for something like 60+ years. Its pretty innocent.

    Along come the authorities. They test this "white powder". It test positive. Why? Because THEY contaminated their sample with the power pole. This hits the 12:00 news! Panic in the streets.

    Was there an explanation given to the public - Nooooo. Not on your life.

    1. Re:Charge the person! by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I never heard of flouring a power pole -- what's that supposed to simulate??

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  126. I'm scared too Re:Counseling? What for? by cdn-programmer · · Score: 1

    I'm scared too. By birth I am an American Citizen born in Canada. But I'm now afraid to travel to the USA and I've counseled my kids on this issue. Don't take a lap top in. Don't take a CD or DVD in. Don't wear clothes.

    There are something like 270 million people in the USA. If we assume 1% of them are paranoid in some way or otherwise limited in common sense and intelligence... then it seems these are the people who will be willing to be the low cost bidders! Are these the people manning the halls of government?

    Up here in Canada here in Calgary I see car parts scattered on my street. Why? We get a big snow dump and we are told by our mayor that because of red tape they can't remove the snow which is now ice and the ruts are 1/2 way up to my knees in places. My tax dollars are spent in the creation of red tape. So I've been asking my neighbors - Does anyone want to run? I'll be the first to contribute to the campaign! I have not found one who wants the job.

    It seems to go to the lowest bidder.

    Sad and sadder indeed.

  127. An 11 years-old, really? by rubi · · Score: 1

    What? Another case of government-induced neurosis?

    I'm sorry to say (and maibe becoming flame-bait) but the US governmend, along with UK and a couple more, have turned their citizens into neurotically-controlled persons afraid of anything that they believe to recognize as a "terrorist" threath.

    An 11 years-old boy now? really?

    What's next, 6 years-old's bicycle can be used to hide a "zero-point quantum device" from the future?

    WAKE UP!

  128. Seven months earlier... by FailedTheTuringTest · · Score: 1

    Although the way this was handled sounds incredibly stupid, I can guess what was going through the VP's mind: seven months ago, a student in another San Diego school successfully detonated five "bombs" that he made using Gatorade bottles.

    http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2009/jun/06/1m6bottle00527-student-arrested-3-blasts-school/?metro&zIndex=111931

    With that being fairly fresh in authorities' minds, I can easily imagine them worrying that the Millenial Tech student had developed a new and improved version. It still sounds like they overreacted, but at least I can understand why.

  129. You think you're kidding by Fished · · Score: 1

    My sons Middle School is practically like that. They keep the kids from interacting wherever possible.

    --
    "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
  130. There will be no charge... by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

    ... but will there be excuses ? And indemnities for the violation of privacies (the parents got their garage raided) ?

    --
    The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
  131. Powerade by lavardo · · Score: 1

    The principal had a Powerade bottle in his hand and got jealous.

  132. Same thing happened to me 25 years ago. by trout007 · · Score: 1

    When I was about this kids age I made a trip wire motion detector with a copper pipe, buzzer, some batteries, toggle switch and a mercury switch purchased at my local Radio Shack. I tied a monofilament line to a tree and stuck this in the ground with the line tied to it. If another kid ran past my house and tripped it, it would go off. I forgot about it and it was found in the street by someones mom who called the police. The police went to her house and talked to her and her kid who knew it was mine. The kid ratted me out so I got a visit from the cop. He asked me if I made such a device and I told him what it was. He apologized to me and said to go pick it out of the street so the mother would calm down. I can't imagine what would happen today. Oh BTW I'm a mechanical engineer now.

    --
    I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
  133. Gatorade bottle by Skapare · · Score: 1

    There was no substance inside the Gatorade bottle? And there are science and technology teachers in this school (or at least there are supposed to be) that could have taken a look at this and immediately figured it out? How many Gatorade bottles are opaque? Does this school principal even have any technology and science education?

    I'm just sick of stupidity being attracted to our schools. We need to educate kids, not dumb them down to the level of school administrators. We need this especially so in science and technology. And we need to have the very best quality at our technology magnet schools.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  134. I agree that this child will need counseling... by rkchang · · Score: 1

    ...for having an inept principal and the trauma of unnecessary police intervention. If something like that happened to me, I'd probably have a panic attack upon stepping on school grounds.

  135. Re:WTF? by anyGould · · Score: 1

    Given how 'cooperative' his parents were with the authorities, most likely. Pity, though, few have such enthusiasm so young.

    If such a thing had happened to me, my parents would've been in school the next morning to demand a public apology from both the school and the vice-principal himself, as well as any required paperwork necessary to transfer me to another school.

    I suspect the parents went along with the fire department as a simple five-minute "no, our kid isn't a terrorist; would you piss off now?" fix. Yeah, they could have made a big stink, but they probably don't want their kid's reputation muddied any further. (I can see the headlines now: "Bomb suspect's parents refuse safety inspection: is your neighbor building WMDs?")

    Agreed on the apologies though. Not necessarily the transfer - once you've got school administration by the short and curlies, your child's academic options look a lot better...

  136. Of course not by dereference · · Score: 1

    Do you honestly think that if the authorities really believed a bomb was being put together there and the parents had refused the search, the police would have shown up a couple of hours later and gently knocked on the door to say "Excuse me, madam, I have a warrant to search this house for explosives, please allow me to execute it peacefully"?

    No, of course not. I'd expect that some kind of SWAT team would be summoned the moment they refused the search in the first place. I'm not at all suggesting my proposed reaction would create anything less than a highly volatile and dangerous situation.

    In fact, they'd probably simply be arrested on the spot. They would not be given any opportunity to contact their attorney, or even their child, to explain the situation. I'd guess that upon being arrested for something like "suspected support of a terrorist" that their house could then be legally searched despite their lack of cooperation. Perhaps then the "fuel for the mower" (noted in a sibling comment) would be used to justify the actions, to counter any potential claims of false arrest.

    Again, it's rather easy (for any of us) to make such a decision as a thought experiment, when there aren't actually real police knocking on the real door, and a real innocent child isn't involved. But it would have been great to see the parents assert/defend their legal rights. I personally don't fear terrorists nearly as much as I fear that each time we don't stand up for our own rights, we risk their further erosion.

    1. Re:Of course not by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Exactly... and the unfortunate fact is, we got to this point by trying to be cooperative in the face of the massive 'inconvenience' that the authorities are able to inflict on us when we don't bend over. If no one had ever bent over in the first place, the authorities wouldn't have the default winning position.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  137. Objective of the project by William-Ely · · Score: 1

    What if the real objective wasn't to make a motion detector it was to get out of school early? I really feel for the kid though. When I was in sixth grade my friend and I came up with an idea to make our own ruby laser. Fortunately we couldn't find a synthetic ruby rod and xenon flash tube. I say fortunately because our master plan was to destroy the school.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred, and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  138. Everyone should send them a little note by shovas · · Score: 1

    I linked the source article and the slashdot article and told them they should be ashamed of themselves.

    --
    Selah.ca. Pause, and calmly think on that.
  139. Huh? by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 1

    What school policies could be violated by making a motion detector for a science fair?!

    The one that says 'Don't make us adults look like complete morons'?

  140. The terrorists have one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was in high school many many years ago, I got a copy of the Army "Improvised Field Munitions Handbook". Basically how to make bombs, weapons and other nasties from basic household or otherwise easy to find items. I made a few of the things, since as a typical male kid at the time, was fun and surprisingly educational at the time. Did a lot of other science experiments with chemicals purchased from the local chemical supply house, would probably have gotten me seriously investigated today. Now, any student sufficiently adept in the hard sciences (Chemistry, Physics, Biology) can be easily traumatized by stupid teachers that don't even fully understand the subject matter they are teaching, labelling them as potential bombers, weapons makers, or biological terrorists.

    The truth is, we NEED students that understand this stuff, that can make this stuff, so that when they working on our side, can understand this stuff. If anything so that they can prevent stupid principals like that from raising false alarms. I mean, it's not like he was re-creating the experiment from "The Manhattan Project".

  141. babbits by babbits · · Score: 1

    The terrorists have won, when we give up sanity and the right to use our brains out of ignorance and stupidity.

  142. Game Over by TheTyrannyOfForcedRe · · Score: 1

    The terrorists have one.

    --
    "Liechtenstein is the world's largest producer of sausage casings, potassium storage units, and false teeth."
  143. This happened to me. by overkill1024 · · Score: 1

    Well, almost. In middle school, back in 2000 for me, I had a simple electrolysis project with a nail, penny, battery and jar of vinegar. My teacher set it outside for the weekend because of the hydrogen and told the janitor what it was so he/she wouldn't remove it. Despite this the battery and wires caught the attention of one of the administrators and the authorities were called in. (at a significant expense I'm told) Fortunately for me they had the luxury of learning their lesson quietly over the weekend and while I never got my $3 worth of parts back I did learn some about our society.

  144. Administration unethical and should be fired. by phorgan1 · · Score: 1

    They're only saying that he violated a policy, and recommending counseling for the kid and parents to spin their idiocy into something else. The guy at the school should be fired for giving an example to the kids of not taking responsibility for his own actions.

  145. In the name of the father by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the name of the father is a movie.

    Watch it.

    Brits do think 11 yos make bombs and they chucked them in prison

  146. Insanity by alistarz · · Score: 1

    The vice principals reaction to this situation was completely irrational. I think this vice principal needs to take responsibility for his or her actions and should apologize to the kid, family, and everyone else involved with the school. He or she works at a school that promotes science and technology. It should be obvious that some students are going to be doing experiments and making things at home. It is completely natural for a student proud of something he or she did to want to share it with friends and possibly teachers. The vice principal should have asked the kid a few questions before coming to his irrational conclusion. By the sounds of it this kid would have been completely willing to explain what the device does and endure a call to his parents to clarify and complied with a request to leave such items made for personal purposes at home in the future. I'm sure the parents know that their child likes to make things and if they are good parents probably encourage it. Now on to a response to some of the comments I've seen on the original article. Some of you have done a really good job of making it seem like every school in America is filled with paranoid incompetent nut jobs as teachers, administrators and other staff, that American schools are filled with metal detectors, pat downs, random searches, officers with weapons, no child is allowed a shred of independent thought, children are forced to sit with their mouths closed and not move for hours on end, and so on. This is certainly not even close to the truth. There are some schools in the US that have indeed gone too far in the sprit of ‘security’ but those schools are a small minority. There are indeed some worrying trends in education and worrying reactions by parents, administrators, other school staff and teachers as evidenced by the original article and a few people’s personal stories such as the ‘could be used for growing pot’ one. Most of the teachers I had growing up were caring individuals who struck a good balance between teaching what was required of them and encouraging individual thought, critical thinking, and appropriate ways of dissenting. I’m speaking as an individual who has personally experienced a variety of school systems (including foreign ones) and am currently a teacher of preschoolers.

  147. Only in America by Cyko_01 · · Score: 1

    a 15yo builds a nuclear reactor in his basement and nobody stops him. But you bring a harmless bottle with some wires in it to school and they lock down the school for a day and force the kid to go to counselling?!

    The terrorists have US citizens cowering in fear. They have already won.

  148. Re:If you REALLY want to let them know what you th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, let me get this straight... The administrator is an idiot for excercising (a bit much) caution when it comes to the safety of a school full of children... and you (and many above you) post libelous and fundamentally un-researched accusations about the person responsible for the safety of the children in question... then provide a link so the libeled admin can see the libelous messages you've all posted? Bright... you must be victims of the conspiracy being illustrated above pertaining to kids growing up not being able to learn anything.

    That stated for the record, I fundamentally agree that the educational *system* no longer cares about educating children, only about justifying the continued funding which keeps getting cut back. The standardized testing in place to report academic progress of a "body of students" determines how much funding the school gets from the government. Without the funding, the school cannot operate and has to close its doors. The schools are governmentally mandated through this process to teach students to pass the tests, not to love learning, not to be curious, not to explore the world (individual teachers do that, the actual educational foot soldiers as it were, not the generals).

    As few years ago as the 80s, we were still pranking our classmates by spreading NI3 around the room (mild contact explosive which snapped if percussed even slightly)... and the teacher was showing us how. I could buy most chemicals necessary to make just about anything at the local hobby store in the chemistry section. The nation was great and the next generation was being trained to be thinkers and keep us moving forward on the front end of technology. The 70s had been a time of democratizing science... now, the geeks are unfriendly and unwelcoming (read the comments above) as the internet has allowed them to stay sheltered and not necessitated learning to use interpersonal communication skills or tact.

    More time teaching ethics to the youth may allow us to undo some of the damage done, allowing more time to let children explore the world. Unfortunately, until the goverment allows education to educate, the US will eventually realize Mike Judges vision of the future in _Idiocracy_ - sad, sad days.

  149. I hate you all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You people don't know what the truth is! It's there, just under their bullshit, but you never look! That's what I hate most about this fucking city -- lies are news and the truth is obsolete!

    Spider Jerusalem

  150. The Game is Afoot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course it may have been another parent that insisted on the search!

    Sherlock Holmes

    1. Re:The Game is Afoot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No shit Sherlock.

      Signing out.

      Spider

  151. Re:If you REALLY want to let them know what you th by SilasMortimer · · Score: 1
    Thank you for providing that link. The following is the message I sent with that form.

    I'm sure you're getting a lot of these right now from other Slashdotters. But this is in a slightly different tone.

    I would like to show you my sincerest gratitude. This is what people need to see. The more incidents like this, the better.

    Every time I meet a parent of a particularly bright child in the public school system, I tell them about how their schools are failing the student. I'm collecting a growing body of evidence to support my claim, as my own story is purely anecdotal and questionable because of that. This is one of the best stories I've yet come across.

    Our public school system is designed for the mediocre. Bright students are discouraged and not challenged enough while the poor students aren't given the attention they need. For the average student, this system of education is sufficient and will prepare them for the place in the workforce that's suitable for them. People are led to believe that magnet schools are the solution, but magnet schools are staffed with the same caliber of educators that other public schools are. Even the knowledgeable, above average teachers are stifled by reactionary administration and the growing prison-like atmosphere of schools designed to leave the teaching of critical thinking skills mostly to the students, their caretakers, universities, and extracurricular, outside groups.

    While public schools will continue to regularly give examples of this, there are few so extreme as to get media attention. This is why I must applaud your actions. I do regret the trauma given to the boy and his family, but hopefully they will eventually realize their importance in the education about education that the general populace needs.

    I will continue to watch for stories about your school. I am certain that you will continue to provide the evidence I need.

    I thank you again.

    --
    Omnes tuae crepidines sunt nobis sunt. Ascendo tuum!
  152. Re: Either they loose it or tighten it... by drachenstern · · Score: 1

    Well ya know they could leave it alone... I know trinary situations often look like binary situations, but we all too often ignore that a deviation from the status quo is not necessary, and since loose and tighten are both verbs, what have we got to lose?

    --
    2^3 * 31 * 647
  153. What bothers me... by rogerdr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    is that, even after finding out that the kid's project was harmless, they went to his house and inspected his garage. There was no rational suspicion of wrongdoing, no evidence to justify further investigation. I can only assume that this was the "We always have to be absolutely sure" excuse used far too often to go where they don't have a real right to.

  154. Re:If you REALLY want to let them know what you th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for the link. I sent them this letter. Maybe not the most eloquent ever written, but something must be better than nothing.

    Hi,

    I read recently in the San Diego Union Tribune about the lock down and evacuation of Millennial Tech Middle School over the motion detection science project brought in by one of the students. I am deeply concerned about these events. We should be encouraging this type of self-motivated learning in our children, not stifling it with fear mongering.

    A simple interview with the student in question should have been enough to diffuse the situation before such extreme measures even needed to be considered. The lack of such a rapport with the students speaks volumes about the character of the vice principle who's first reaction was to call police.

    In addition to these unfortunate events, the school seems to be unapologetic towards the student in concern, even suggesting that he had violated a school policy. Please indicate to me which section of the school policy the student has violated? Below is the link to the school policy.

    http://www.mtechmiddle.org/apps/pages/index.jsp?uREC_ID=58810&type=d&termREC_ID=&pREC_ID=87933&hideMenu=1&rn=8708720

    At the very least the school owes a public apology to this student, his family, and the other families affected by this unfortunate incident.

    Please take a moment to reflect on the wider impacts of such reactions on our society in general. What sort of brilliant minds are we stifling with this sort of behavior?

    Sincerely,
    A very concerned citizen

  155. For the record by pax+humana · · Score: 1

    From the article: Both the student and his parents were "very cooperative" with authorities, Luque said. He said fire officials also went to the student's home and checked the garage to make sure items there were neither harmful nor explosive. "There was nothing hazardous at the house," Luque said. The student will not be prosecuted, but authorities were recommending that he and his parents get counseling, the spokesman said. The student violated school policies, but there was no criminal intent, Luque said. "There will be no (criminal) charges whatsoever," Luque said. Police and fire officials also will not seek to recover costs associated with responding to the incident, the spokesman said. Luque said both the student and his parents were extremely upset. "He was very shaken by the whole situation, as were his parents," Luque said. from some other article: Amendment 4 - Search and Seizure. Ratified 12/15/1791. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

  156. High School Rifle Squad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was in high-school (22 years ago) there was a "rifle squad" as one of the cheerleading sections. (in addition to the Cheerleaders, the "Twirlers" (Majorettes?), and the Pom-pom squad) These were mostly wood but they didn't look like broomsticks. They looked like rifles with all-white stocks. They were accurately weighted too.

    Given the way the girls handled them, they probably could have used them like a quarterstaff in case of attack. So I suppose they could accuratly be considered weapons.

  157. grandparent sig by McFly777 · · Score: 1

    His sig has to be one of the best I have seen. I have almost been caught by it on several occasions, but in each case I realized it was meant to be humor just before I clicked Reply.

    --

    McFly777
    - - -
    "What do people mean when they say the computer went down on them?" -Marilyn Pittman