Slashdot Mirror


California Wants To Put E-Ads On License Plates

techmuse writes "The San Jose Mercury News reports that the California state legislature wants to put electronic advertising on license plates. The plate would display standard plate information when the car is moving, but would also display ads when the car is stopped for more than 4 seconds (say, at a red light). Not distracting or annoying at all! 'The bill has received no formal opposition. It passed unanimously through the Senate last month and is scheduled to be heard Monday by the Assembly Transportation Committee.'"

624 comments

  1. Really? by an00bis · · Score: 5, Funny

    You stay classy California.

    1. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can see everybody loving having a flashing ad for "male enhancement" products on their plates at the stop lights

    2. Re:Really? by thoughtspace · · Score: 4, Funny

      What? Honk if you're horny?

    3. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're talking about a state that elected a circus side-show freak to govern it.

    4. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will it get "designed & created in california" written in fine-print on the back?

    5. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not, its California, people could simply bolt an iPad with custom number plate app on the back of their cars. They'd get the custom number plate number and the flurry of unwanted ads all in one go.

    6. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's worse than that: the side-show freak was an improvement over the idiots who preceded him. I kid you not, Jerry Brown was once the governor of this state!

    7. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You stay classy California.

      Yep. Remember -- we're the state whose idiot voters a few years back allowed collection of DNA simply on arrest, not to wait for conviction or even indictment.

      IIRC, there was a suit many years back that went as far as the SC. Someone had a license plate like "Idaho -- Famous Potatoes" or "Utah -- Skiing Wonderland". He taped over the ad, contesting that he had no obligation to engage in unwilling, unpaid advertiser for the state. He also contended that his action in no way detracted from the plate's primary function of uniquely identifying his vehicle or demonstrating current registration status. I believe the SC upheld his position. (Bet it didn't stop the bastard cops form harassing him "on good faith because the decision wasn't sufficiently promulgated.)

      I'll also bet this will be OKed by the courts, as they've been thoroughly co-opted by business interests over the years.

      Next issue -- how slow do you have to be going for the shit to appear? It may even contribute to traffic safety if drivers slow down well in advance and creep forward slowly, instead of coming quickly up to the car ahead and stopping at the last minute. If so, it would sure change my driving habits.OTOH, I'd also spend a decent time working out a simple accelerometer-controlled circuit to disconnect the son of a bitch while stopped. The components have to be incredibly cheap these days.

      It may also add to the fun if other states enact laws saying that any plate driving through the state maintain a constant display of the license number only. Of course the plate will likely, in the end, be required to display the number for the benefit of the prick cops' drive-by plate scanners. Fucking bastards.

    8. Re:Really? by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      I can see everybody loving having a flashing ad for "male enhancement" products on their plates at the stop lights

      Only on high performance cars please.

    9. Re:Really? by thrawn_aj · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Indeed. I live in CA and my answer to the numbnut legislators who came up with this is simple - use Sacramento as a fucking billboard instead of whoring out the entire population of the state because you can't do your job worth a damn and balance your fucking budget. I propose an alternative. Turn the state capitol and its environs into a billboard farm (the walls should sell for a high price dontcha think?) and make all legislators, state and local, wear those garish advertisement suits (like the Nascar idiots). That oughta bring in the cash. I swear, at this point, it seems like those douchebags have just given up entirely. Twits. Another year of this nonsense and I swear I'm gonna go Republican :'( NTTAWWT

      Someone clue me in on this - exactly what happens if a state goes bankrupt? What if a state legislature just throws up its hands and says, "I got nuthin". Can they just, ah ... foreclose on a state? I mean, what are we looking at here, worst case? Should I start stocking up on canned goods and shit? Emigrate to Oregon? What?

    10. Re:Really? by thrawn_aj · · Score: 1

      Remember -- we're the state whose idiot voters a few years back allowed collection of DNA simply on arrest, not to wait for conviction or even indictment.

      I can think of several good ways to comply with that. "Hold out your hand officers".

    11. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, I wonder how prone this would be to "failure" that might cause the ad plate to display at all times. Good luck sending that speeding ticket to the owner of licence plate "AVATAR - Now on DVD!"

    12. Re:Really? by MalHavoc · · Score: 4, Funny

      It'll be great when a car gets pulled over for speeding and the cop calls in the license plate.
      "Roger, I need a check on a plate. California plate Papa-Three-November-One-Sierra. Wait no, scratch that. He rolled forward a bit. New plate number Charlie-One-Alpha-One-Sierra."

    13. Re:Really? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      make all legislators, state and local, wear those garish advertisement suits (like the Nascar idiots).

      That's not advertising, it's sponsorship. Entirely different thing, just like campaign contributions and bribery.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    14. Re:Really? by vtcodger · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's way worse than that. The state was New Hampshire and the slogan that was taped over was "LIVE FREE OR DIE".

      http://www.freedomforum.org/templates/document.asp?documentID=15440

      Eventually, the case was heard by the Supreme Court of the Unites States. New Hampshire lost 6-3 on First Amendment -- Freedom of Speech grounds. The defendant was eventually awarded legal fees which New Hampshire refused to pay until a marshall walked into a state liquor store with a writ and demanded $21,000.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    15. Re:Really? by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      make all legislators, state and local, wear those garish advertisement suits (like the Nascar idiots).

      That's not advertising, it's sponsorship. Entirely different thing, just like campaign contributions and bribery.

      So, those "garish advertisement suits" should clearly show every company who's money the politico thinks is more important than his constituents opinions.

      Sounds like a great idea. People will know who to blame when things go sideways.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    16. Re:Really? by vtcodger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A truly brilliant idea.

      Policeman to bystander. "So, the bank robbers were driving a black sedan and you aren't sure of the make or year because all cars look alike nowadays? I don't suppose you got the license number?"

      Bystander. "Sure. It was 'WALMART ROLLS BACK PRICES'".

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    17. Re:Really? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Someone should photoshop[1] it.

      [1] Other image manipulation programs are available.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    18. Re:Really? by thegnu · · Score: 1

      surely they wouldn't stoop so low as to allow people to advertise boner pills and penis pumps. they will no doubt stick with respectable advertisers, like plastic surgeons.

      *ugly?* of course you are. we can help! (unless it's your penis, that's gross)

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    19. Re:Really? by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 4, Funny

      wear those garish advertisement suits (like the Nascar idiots).

      Idiots? They make more money than we do and all they have to do is drive fast and turn left. Who's the bigger idiot?

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    20. Re:Really? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Someone clue me in on this - exactly what happens if a state goes bankrupt? What if a state legislature just throws up its hands and says, "I got nuthin". Can they just, ah ... foreclose on a state? I mean, what are we looking at here, worst case? Should I start stocking up on canned goods and shit? Emigrate to Oregon? What?

      In the big picture, noone will buy their Bonds.

      More specifically, it means they can't borrow money. Including money needed to refinance existing bonds when they come due.

      Since they don't bring in enough revenue to pay existing obligations, that means big tax increases or even bigger cuts in public services. Or some combination of the two. Since your legislators can't make the required hard decisions, that's going to default to "even bigger cuts in public services" when the public servants discover that they're not being paid anymore....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    21. Re:Really? by TheLink · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow. He covers up the "live free" slogan, and they jailed him for that. Sounds like "the beatings will continue until morale improves" ;).

      Later on he moves to Connecticut and covers up "The Constitution State" and gets a citation for that... Talk about irony.

      Anyway, the e-ads are a ridiculous idea from so many points, are they really serious about it?

      Just because the vehicle is stationary doesn't mean you wouldn't need to know the license plate number. Most people drive around with non-faked license plates because they think they'll never commit a serious enough crime. But the difference between a law abiding citizen and a criminal is often just a lapse in judgement, a bad mistake or two.

      --
    22. Re:Really? by BlueKitties · · Score: 1

      Assuming they have an intelligent advertising system, we might be able to deduce that there was only one black sedan displaying "WALMART ROLLS BACK PRICES" in the area at that time.

      --
      "Sorrow is better than laughter, for by sadness of face the heart is made glad." [Ecclesiastes 7:3]
    23. Re:Really? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Another year of this nonsense and I swear I'm gonna go Republican

      What's the point? The Reps sold us out last year so the Dems got their 2/3 majority to pass the tax hike. One of them practically admitted it in an interview afterward how, as a group, they selected the ones to cross the line. There is no political party for the hard working citizen anymore. We will become Greece very soon.

    24. Re:Really? by Adriax · · Score: 1

      And a "known to cause cancer" warning label taking up half the visible space.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    25. Re:Really? by Sentrion · · Score: 1

      What if a state legislature just throws up its hands and says, "I got nuthin". Can they just, ah ... foreclose on a state?

      Yes, China will foreclose on California since they are the primary creditor. This will give the Chinese a logistical advantage to pump their cheap plastic into the rest of the States. The Chinese will also solve California's unemployment, since every Californian will be guaranteed a position on an assembly line for $0.14/hour. This will also solve California's illegal immigration problem.

    26. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The idiot is not the person who is accomplishing nothing but driving fast in circles, regardless of how much money other idiots are willing to pay to watch or sponsor him.

    27. Re:Really? by ComputerGeek01 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I live in Buffalos NY and our CITY has been backrupt for awhile now. They got assigned a control board from ??? by ???, I didn't vote for any of those retards, who don't allow them to spend anything but then they whine and cry like little kids until they get what they want anyway. They close down parks and the such (although a state wouldn't be responsible for that anyway) and spend what ever money they can pry out of the control board for project A on special interest project B anyway. So basically you get less services and pay more taxes and nothing else changes.

    28. Re:Really? by blueZ3 · · Score: 1

      Injecting "assuming" and "intelligent" into a discussion about the California Legislature?

      > head explodes <

      --
      Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    29. Re:Really? by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Informative

      The irony of course is that the guy who received the citation still doesn't understand the First Amendment:

      His faith causes him to question whether the First Amendment has been extended too far in certain circumstances. He says that the First Amendment should not protect immorality. "I think that freedom should protect the right principles of morality," he says.

      "I think the ACLU does a good job for good things and I think they do a good job for bad things, such as protecting pornography and homosexuality -- things that conflict with the teachings of the Bible," Maynard says.

      "But they did right by me in my case and I still appreciate that."

      Some men you just can't reach...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    30. Re:Really? by operagost · · Score: 2, Insightful
      From the link:

      He believed that the motto violated his religious beliefs because it implied that one had to give up his life for the state.

      Reading comprehension FAIL.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    31. Re:Really? by robfromnyc · · Score: 1

      The only people allowed to advertise on my car is me. I'm not allowing anyone else to use my vehicle for their money making. New York already makes a boat load of cash on registration and license renewal fees. If I need extra cash desperately, then I'll allow some big company to plaster my car front to back. There are plenty of cars in Manhattan that have this happening, just like the tourist buses and city buses. State governments need to eliminate their b.s. before eliminating necessary funds for its' citizens, or taxing the hell out of them. The fees these government officials pay "experts" can balance most of the budgets in this country.

    32. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He only covered the "or die" part.

    33. Re:Really? by Adriax · · Score: 1

      Forget that, reprogram it to display whatever license number you want. Imagine a blackmarket iphone app that does image recognition on a snapshot of a vehicle to determine the make/model/year of a car they're stealing, and search a database of plate numbers for a suitable replacement from an identical car belonging to a cops wife or some elected official.

      These plus e-ink pixels embedded into a cart's paintjob, your getaway car can go from a red camaro with plates matching the chief of police's mistress, to a white camaro with a yellow flamejob and plates registered to an out of town restaurant manager.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    34. Re:Really? by operagost · · Score: 1

      surely they wouldn't stoop so low as to allow people to advertise boner pills and penis pumps.

      They hand out condoms to seventh graders there.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    35. Re:Really? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Brown wasn't that bad a governor. He was lots better than Regan or Nixon...which we were also afflicted with. (He did have a simply huge ego, but lots of politicians have that problem. He thought he was a Steve Jobs kind of visionary...but he didn't get the details right.)

      OTOH, he's just recently been a truly terrible mayor.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    36. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "designed & created in california"

      Assembled in China.

    37. Re:Really? by thegnu · · Score: 1

      twas a joke

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    38. Re:Really? by RepelHistory · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I can't see how this will withstand a constitutional challenge. Commercial speech in the US is less protected than political/expressive speech, so if anything the government should have a weaker case than it did when that New Hampshire conviction got overturned (it will have much greater difficulty showing compelling interest for the statute, assuming the same level of scrutiny is used). Freedom of speech includes freedom not to speak.

    39. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same thing happens as when a person goes bankrupt.
      Eventually the state tries to write a check, and their client tries to cash it.
      The check bounces, and the client doesn't get paid for their work.
      Do this to enough clients, and nobody will voluntary work for the State of California.

      Then all your public sector stuff starts being taken back by mother nature.
      That's good though, because now you have less stuff, so sooner or later your taxes can pay for keeping the stuff you have, and it falls back into balance.

    40. Re:Really? by AthleteMusicianNerd · · Score: 1

      Don't worry about the state going bankrupt. The Federal Government will bail the stupid legislators out. I'd like it to be clear that the citizens are not being bailed out unless you're a firefighter or teacher. We've been paying taxes, and getting screwed just like the rest of the country will soon be.

    41. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      State debt is unsecured, which means the bondholder would be SOL if the state defaults. However, that also means that the state can't borrow new money (cheaply) through issuing bonds due to their shiny new "junk" credit rating.

    42. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > head asplodes

      FTFY

    43. Re:Really? by kenj0418 · · Score: 1

      how slow do you have to be going for the shit to appear? It may even contribute to traffic safety if drivers slow down well in advance and creep forward slowly, instead of coming quickly up to the car ahead and stopping at the last minute.

      Why would I alter my driving patterns to keep the guy behind me from being annoyed by an ad?

    44. Re:Really? by qazxsw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How about selling the state name like a sports stadium? :)

    45. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go republican, Really? Who's bloody fuckin son and heir do you think thought this idea up? Certainly not we Democrats! I would not want to be a black or minority person in, say, a rich republikan county who got stopped by an offecer who then broke my plate and said: BOY! Get out of that f$&#^ng car and stick yer hands in the air, yer arrested for havin a broke lisense plate!

    46. Re:Really? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 5, Funny

      "OK, the plate seems to be: Victor-India-Alpha-Golf-Romeo-Alpha."

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    47. Re:Really? by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      This is why I want to completely ban lobbying of all forms. There is far too much money to be made as a politician. Remove that incentive, and you'll remove those that want the power; instead you'll have people campaigning that actually want to make a difference.

      It would also be good for getting rid of the barrier to entry to politics. How will you get elected if you can't afford a TV ad? How will you afford a TV ad if you don't have lobbyists? And how will you have lobbyists unless you've got a party that can get your votes passed which bring money to the corporation via pork barrel? The answer is, you won't, and that's why we're still stuck with a 2-party solution.

      As a disenfranchised republican (but definitely not a democrat), I simply want a return to sound finance. Cut government and government spending, and then cut taxes, in that order. There are no parties to vote for which cater to these ideals. Either a libertarian or true conservative would be a great start. At our current rate of spending we'll have $18T of national debt before Obama's FIRST term is up.

      regarding what happens with California, either 1). Obama or the Fed bails them out (it would look bad on the US for a state to default on their bonds) or 2). they _have_ to cut spending and taxes. I much prefer #2, and so would all the businesses that are fleeing the state.

    48. Re:Really? by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Wait no, scratch that. He rolled forward a bit. New plate number Charlie-One-Alpha-One-Sierra."

      More likely Charlie-One-Alpha-Lambda-One-Sierra.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    49. Re:Really? by Sigmon · · Score: 1

      A decade ago I would have agreed with you, and you are probably still correct. These days I have to wonder, however. The Supreme Court of the United States has recently upheld the practice of municipalities condemning and acquiring private property owned by a citizen - for the sole purpose of giving it to another citizen because the latter plans to develop the property such that it better benefits the tax collections for the municipality. Government does need to be able to take private land - with just compensation to the owner - for public use such as roads, parks, etc. The framers of the constitution never intended that power to be used in ways it has been recently. The revenue generating potential (for the state) of what another citizen plans to do with the land outweighs the fact that the land is mine.

      Therefore, It is possible that the courts will side with the state. The revenue generating potential of having a mini billboard on something that travels state-owned roads may outweigh the fact that it is supposedly owned by me.

    50. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I understand how you feel. Even if this idea goes nowhere the core problem is the California legislature can not increase (any) taxes and currently most of the gov't budget comes from income tax. It requires a 2/3 majority to raise any existing tax and the vocal 1/3 of Republicans block any new taxes. If many of us were to feel like you and vote Republican more ideas like this would have to arrive because they have not found any other way to increase state revenues because "tax" is a dirty word. Desperate ideas like this own show you just how bad it has become in Sacramento. We need substantial change and who the governor is does not really matter.

    51. Re:Really? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      "The plan will also bump license plate annual fees by $200. When asked why this didn't reduce or eliminate license plate fees, the senator replied, 'You just don't get it.'"

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    52. Re:Really? by thrawn_aj · · Score: 1

      wear those garish advertisement suits (like the Nascar idiots).

      Idiots? They make more money than we do and all they have to do is drive fast and turn left. Who's the bigger idiot?

      So do hookers. Big whoop. If it helps, consider the word "idiots" withdrawn. That wasn't the point of the post anyway. I just wanted to preserve the general rhythm of the sentence :p

    53. Re:Really? by thrawn_aj · · Score: 1

      Gah. Since welfare will be the last to go, this just means essential public services start going first. I wish you were wrong but I can see that happening already. AC transit just declared a state of "fiscal emergency" a month back and will be rolling out service reductions soon.

    54. Re:Really? by thrawn_aj · · Score: 1

      We will become Greece very soon.

      On the bright side, I can drown my sorrows in Baklava then. But yeah, thanks for cheering me up :p

    55. Re:Really? by twidarkling · · Score: 1

      Actually, you'd be coming up to the ad more slowly, so you wouldn't be able to see it as long. He never said anything about cars behind, after all.

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
    56. Re:Really? by AdamWill · · Score: 1

      Wait, what? Where you live all the hookers have to do is drive fast and turn left? I think the hookers in your town may be sort of missing the point of their profession...

    57. Re:Really? by thrawn_aj · · Score: 1

      Ask and the intertubes shall deliver. This and that. First one's not a photoshop, but yeah, lazy GIS - sue me :p

    58. Re:Really? by thrawn_aj · · Score: 1

      I knew some smartass was gonna say that =D. The joke's on you pal. There's probably already a fetish site with chicks in latex suits driving fast and going left. Rawr!

    59. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I think that the ultimate authority is God and that is the government that I choose to follow," Maynard says.

      I find that offensive.

    60. Re:Really? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Too bad the financial crisis is caused by the direct voting of individuals more so than the politicians, but hey, why blame the idiots who enacted a bunch of new spending bills and no new revenue bills to balance it out ...

      Seriously, California get itself into this mess on its own, directly, without any help from the politicians other than they let you start with direct voting, you have no one to blame but yourselves.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    61. Re:Really? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Since welfare will be the last to go, this just means essential public services start going first.

      Wish I could tell you you were wrong.

      But...Welfare is an "entitlement". Which means that absent specific legislation to the contrary, it will be paid before any other government obligation.

      So, yes, "essential public services" will be cut before "entitlements", and things will go south rather quickly once it begins....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    62. Re:Really? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      On the plus side, they'll have yet another reason to pull people over.

      Officer: Do you know why I stopped you?
      Driver: Um.. for going 55 in a 55?
      Officer: Don't get smart with me, meow. You have a bad pixel on your rear plate.
      Driver: Bad as in misbehaved?
      Officer: Bad as in SHUT YOUR WHORE MOUTH! [Driver: That doesn't even make sense..] That's a $100 fine, plus destruction of government property. Keep mouthing off and we'll add disorderly conduct! Ain't so funny meow, is it?

    63. Re:Really? by RubberDuckie · · Score: 1

      Sorry, until you eliminate the 75% vote necessary to pass a budget, you'll get a mess that pleases no one, and is late to boot. Now if we can get 76% of one party voted in, we might get something to happen. And yes, I'm a native Californian but not terribly proud of it at the moment.

    64. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congrats for being one of the very few to get the phonetic alphabet right.

    65. Re:Really? by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      About 20 or 30 years ago, New Zealand was so far in debt that the world bank cut off their credit. There were big advertisements on the tops of hospitals, police cars, and any space big enough to put an ad owned by the government. Seems to me that California is at least trying to be responsible for getting their house in order before their credit is cut off. And governments will have their credit cut off if eventually if they don't balance their books. Look at Greece. Look at Argentina who defaulted on all their loans... lenders won't let it get that far again. Good on California if they can make a buck doing this.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    66. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *honk* *honk*

    67. Re:Really? by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      The SCOTUS did nothing of the damn sort. They ruled that municipal eminent domain takings are a matter of state, not federal, law and that states are entitled to make dumb laws as long as they don't violate the US constitution. That's original intent if I ever saw it. The four "conservative" bozos of course saw a federal interest because they are totally lacking in principles and actually think judicial activism is fine as long as it is in the interest of conservative causes.

      Come to that, the takings clause in the fifth amendment only requires "just compensation". It does not forbid taking of property.

      As to whether the citizens of Connecticut have/had a problem with their state and local governments that they need/needed to correct, that's an entirely different issue.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    68. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nixon was never governor of California.

    69. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The irony of course is that the guy who received the citation still doesn't understand the First Amendment: ...

      Is it also ironic that Maynard is not required to understand or agree with the First Amendment, the Pledge, etc.? Do you realize the First Amendment is not there to protect your right to agree with First Amendment so much as it is there to protect your right to disagree with it?

    70. Re:Really? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      No, we were spared that. But he tried.

      However saying that he never became governor doesn't say he didn't inflict his person in Calif. politics in other ways. (Representative, Senator, etc., to consider only the official roles.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  2. Programmable Number Plates by Bronster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh goody - programmable number plates. What could possibly go wrong. I can just imagine how happy the jackers are going to be - no need to switch plates, just upload a custom firmware and you're gold.

    1. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Bronster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      On the flip side, I'd love a "back off" button I could get to make the plate flash a message at the wanker behind me, or even a "turn your lights on".

    2. Re:Programmable Number Plates by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Speed and red light cameras become useless too, I can see a huge underground industry built up around this because there's no way in hell what ever "encryption" they use will last.

      Car in motion > 30 mph = some random number.
      Car stopped and < 30 mph = your 'real' number.

      Then ads for being stopped.

    3. Re:Programmable Number Plates by jhoegl · · Score: 3, Funny

      So... when the cop pulls you over your real number will be displayed... GENIUS!

    4. Re:Programmable Number Plates by nametaken · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It says they're looking to be able to put logos and such on the plates too, to "support your favorite team". So I can just imagine what the first hacker is going to draw on a plate.

      So they're running a $19 billion deficit and these are the ideas they're coming up with to fix the problem? How about, STOP SPENDING SO MUCH MONEY?

      The best ones were at the bottom... other upcoming CA legislation. Making it illegal to use a mobile device while on a bicycle? Really? They have nothing better to worry about? Making all lead ammunition illegal for hunting... excepting that it's already illegal to use in most cases? Time well spent, you goofs. Oh, but they remembered to throw in some legislation to make it easier for people to transfer their foodstamp program benefits. Glad to see they have their priorities straight. :P

    5. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This is in California where they use lost of speed cameras

    6. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm actually HOPING they decide to do this out east for exactly this purpose!

    7. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Statecraftsman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Possible ad you may see on your license plate in the future:

      Jailbreak your license plate. $19.95. Text 'Plate' to 55555 and follow this car for 60 seconds.

    8. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Koby77 · · Score: 1

      The fake plate display is only good for defeating cameras. When the cop pulls you over, you HAVE to display your real license plate, unless you'd like the cop to believe that you either have falsified plates, or perhaps a stolen vehicle, in addition to your speeding ticket.

      Of course, this would force the police to fund actual live police officers, instead of a bunch of cameras that do nothing to prevent serious crimes, and exist purely to stuff money into the coffers of government bureaucracy.

    9. Re:Programmable Number Plates by GrumpySteen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I can see a huge underground industry built up around this because there's no way in hell what ever "encryption" they use will last.

      And then, once the encryption is broken, they can justify passing an even more draconian version of the DMCA that makes breaking encryption a felony with mandatory prison time. Hooray for the future!

    10. Re:Programmable Number Plates by jhoegl · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yes because slowing down to prevent speeding tickets would be illogical...
      here in AZ, we just let the contract lapse on speed cameras on the highway, reason for the opposition to the cameras? Because its just a money scam... WHAT?!?!?
      Slow the fuck down, and shut the fuck up.

    11. Re:Programmable Number Plates by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Funny

      I support team goatse.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    12. Re:Programmable Number Plates by deniable · · Score: 1

      Making all lead ammunition illegal for hunting...

      Is that to prevent lead poisoning to the target or because kids might chew on bullets?

    13. Re:Programmable Number Plates by deniable · · Score: 0, Redundant

      It's the next job for Goatse Security. Hey, it may stop tail-gating.

    14. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      On the flip side, I'd love a "back off" button I could get to make the plate flash a message at the wanker behind me, or even a "turn your lights on".

      I think we all would at times. There are some homemade examples of this on youtube. Do note, however, that this is a direct violation of the law in many places and would fall under more general reckless driving laws in the rest.

      Rule of thumb: moving/changing signs are not allowed on cars.

      Also for those who don't know; The California state legislature throws stupid stuff like this around all the time. It never goes anywhere. They don't do it because they want to pass the law. They do it because there is some wealthy business behind it. This is clearly a crappy ad for some crappy ad manufacturer.

    15. Re:Programmable Number Plates by nametaken · · Score: 1

      The article said it was to prevent animals from swallowing spent casings and introducing lead into the food chain. I couldn't speak to the likelihood or real impact of that actually happening.

    16. Re:Programmable Number Plates by compro01 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How about, STOP SPENDING SO MUCH MONEY?

      8 words : Ballot measures making a lot of spending mandatory.

      6 more words : Super-majority required for tax increases.

      People vote for ballot measures for spending, but then vote against the tax increases to pay for it.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    17. Re:Programmable Number Plates by c0lo · · Score: 1

      Oh goody - programmable number plates. What could possibly go wrong. I can just imagine how happy the jackers are going to be - no need to switch plates, just upload a custom firmware and you're gold.

      Huh? Firmware upgrade? You're kidding, right?
      Why risk a conviction through DMCA while a low tech attack is possible? Like: just impair the connection allowing the plate to know what speed you drive on and the red camera will catch the ad of the moment.
      Average Joe cannot be required to know how to maintain an "eAd plate" in good functioning order (by contrast with the traditional plate), but he might know just enough to "artistically" severe a wire so that it will look like "normal wear" (and fight in court whatever speeding ticket the police would be able to send him after a possible long and costly investigation.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    18. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's California. The state legislature is the biggest circle-jerk in the world--it's in the Guinness Book of Records.

    19. Re:Programmable Number Plates by lul_wat · · Score: 1

      There's probably nothing stopping you installing an LCD or LED display currently if you were actually going to do that.

      --
      Divide a cake by zero. Is it still a cake?
    20. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Decollete · · Score: 1

      No, in that case, the ad will be displayed. Marketing genius!

    21. Re:Programmable Number Plates by PitaBred · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'll slow down as soon as the speed limits are set by engineers and not politicians and people with a monetary stake in the revenue from tickets resulting from said limits.

    22. Re:Programmable Number Plates by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree. I would also appreciate being able to say, "Sorry.", or "Thanks.". I realize that I can wave, but it isn't as effective, in my opinion. I feel that if we could communicate with each other, then we'd be safer.

    23. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps a message:

      "This vehicle can go 60-0 in less than the time the average person can react to move their foot from gas to brake pedal. The owner of this vehicle is a member of the local Bar association, and has a CHL (concealed handgun license) with semi autos. Are you sure you want to continue to tailgate?"

      Too small a text though.

    24. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Cmdrm · · Score: 1

      There is no way all of that would fit on the license plate. Unless it scrolled across a long flat, UK-styled, plate.

    25. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Why bother with the encryption.

      Just knock out whatever accelerometer they're using for "stop control" and let the speed trap fight it out with McDonald's or whoever is advertising this month. Tell the cops, I didn't notice, I guess it's that huge speedbump at the DMV.

      Hardware mods are more fun anyway...

    26. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Nkwe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The article said it was to prevent animals from swallowing spent casings and introducing lead into the food chain. I couldn't speak to the likelihood or real impact of that actually happening.

      It is not the shell casings, it is the bullet or the shot inside shotgun shells. Birds that bottom feed eat the used shot on the bottom of lakes and waterways causing the lead to get into the (animal) food chain. It is not just waterfowl, scavengers such as the condor are also effected. Lead Shot

    27. Re:Programmable Number Plates by __aajfby9338 · · Score: 1

      I think you meant to refer to bullets/shot, not casings. Casings are usually made from brass, or plastic with a brass head in the case of shotgun hulls. Some ammunition has steel casings; this stuff is generally either Soviet-bloc military surplus ammunition or commercial ammunition made for export in former Soviet-bloc nations.

    28. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure why they'd talk about the casing in that case, but at least with shotgun pellets the problem is quite real.

    29. Re:Programmable Number Plates by unkiereamus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      How about, STOP SPENDING SO MUCH MONEY?

      8 words : Ballot measures making a lot of spending mandatory.

      6 more words : Super-majority required for tax increases.

      People vote for ballot measures for spending, but then vote against the tax increases to pay for it.

      So, 2005 was the last year I could conveniently find (read 10 seconds of googling) numbers for, but according to taxfoundation.org, in 2005, CA sent ~$286,627,000,000 to the Federal Government, on the other hand they received ~$242,023,000,000 dollars worth of federal funding.

      I'd just like to note that this represents a 44.6 billion dollar disparity.

      Of course, the withdrawal of that money from the federal budget would mean the effective collapse of numerous other states (I started to add up the numbers, but frankly, I'm too lazy.)

      --
      I needed a sig so people would know who I am, but I was too drunk to make something witty, so you get this instead.
    30. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Pikoro · · Score: 1

      "Allow or Cancel"

      --
      "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
    31. Re:Programmable Number Plates by SmitherIsGod · · Score: 3, Informative
    32. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Splab · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Roads are built to code, they are designed to handle cars at the speed politicians have set with a margin for idiots.

      Please make sure you only kill yourself when you have an accident...

    33. Re:Programmable Number Plates by mgblst · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      No you wont, you are just a dick, making excuses for speeding.

      It has been proven many times over, the slower you go in a built up area, the less critical and minor accidents occur.

      You are just a standard car driver, don't give a shit about anything outside of your own car.

    34. Re:Programmable Number Plates by sectoidman · · Score: 4, Informative

      Lead shot and bullets (especially copper-jacketed bullets) aren't terribly dangerous as far as lead exposure goes, since the elemental lead used in projectile construction isn't as bio-available as its derivative organic compounds (like, say, lead acetate or tetra-ethyl lead).

    35. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the article mentioned that the use of lead shot in wetlands is illegal. I know it is in the state I live in and all the surrounding ones. You can, however, use lead shot on Pheasants and such in a field (iirc), though everyone uses steel shot anyways.

    36. Re:Programmable Number Plates by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      custom firmware and you're gold.

      It would be pretty stupid to make them limited to one color.

    37. Re:Programmable Number Plates by nametaken · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm quite familiar with the difference between bullets, shot, primers, wads, powder, shotshells and pistol and rifle casings. I'm a longtime shooter. I specifically used the language used in the article to avoid any confusion.

    38. Re:Programmable Number Plates by eggnoglatte · · Score: 1

      This, in a nutshell, is why representative democracy is better than direct democracy.

    39. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This. 85th percentile rules.

      Want a realistic speed limit, with zero meaningless bullshit involved? Build your road. Open it to the public. Monitor the speed of traffic for a month or more. There WILL be some idiots who drive to fast - just let them, they are part of the formula. There will also be some other morons who drive so slow, you wonder if they are alive or not. No problem - they are also part of the formula.

      After you've monitored speeds for a reasonable period of time (remember, I said a month or more - six months seems to long, probably 60 to 90 days is right) you find that 85th percentile, and post that as the speed limit. Go ahead, and round it to the nearest 5 mph, or, if you insist (out of some unfounded fear) round to the next LOWER 5 mph. Post that speed limit now.

      You will find that *almost* nobody speeds. You have found the magical number, which reasonable people can all agree on. Some still drive to slow - and you really ought to check them out. Elderly people, people with poor vision, people with poor reflexes, people with near zero experience. Go ahead, and check them out.

      Those who normally speed through bullshit speed zones are *mostly* going to recognize that the speed limit here is reasonable, and they will tend to observe it, or stay within that 5 mph over range, for which almost no cop ever pulls a guy over.

      The oddball who INSISTS that he is going to drive 10 to 30 mile over the speed limit is an utter moron, and he needs to be taken to court, fined, driver's license suspended, and possibly given some jail time. He has no business on the road.

      This formula scares some people. "Oh dear, doing things this way might mean speed limits over 80 MPH!"

      Tough noogies. If 80, 90, or 100 MPH scares you, then you have no business driving on a major highway. Take the back roads, and look at the pretty farms along the way. Or, just stay in town, and fly if you must travel to another city.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    40. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You, sir, seem to have bought into the idea that the politicians who vote and set the speed limits have a clue. GP knows what he is talking about. Google the terms "speed limit" and "85th percentile".

      You, and all drivers and voters, should be aware that politicians have no desire to post "safe" speed limits, because the vast majority of people will observe those speed limits. Their motivation is to generate revenue, by posting speed limits BELOW what safety dictates. If you know of a road near you where more than half the people consistently speed by more than 10 MPH over the speed limit, then you know of a cash cow.

      There is SOME truth in your statement. In residential and business areas, streets that are poorly designed are indeed dangerous. For instance, there is absolutely NO REASON to put a 6 lane highway through a school zone - or, conversely, to build a school on a 6 lane highway. Depending on which was built first, whoever designed and built the latter structure was a complete MORON!!

      However, the 85th percentile applies even in built up areas, PROVIDED THAT the streets and roads were designed and built by engineers and contractors who have a clue about traffic flow.

      When you get into old city areas that predate motor vehicles, and when you get into cities and towns with no zoning or planning committees, then all bets are off.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    41. Re:Programmable Number Plates by __aajfby9338 · · Score: 1

      Cool.

    42. Re:Programmable Number Plates by roman_mir · · Score: 2, Informative

      So what is the point of posting it?

      What is the point of posting a speed limit at a limit that is already natural to 85% of people on that road? WHY POST IT?

      There is no need to set a speed limit at all, unless there is some unnatural thing happening around a zone, like a school zone where the speed limit is not due to the road conditions but is there because some kids are dumb and/or inattentive, while others just don't understand the danger yet due to lack of experience?

      There is no need to post a speed limit on a road that has no obstacles of the kind described above.

      I am driving in Germany for the past half a year, and there is nothing special about the Autobahn that makes it so much different from most US/Canadian highways, in fact Autobahn is much more narrow than many highways that I normally drive in Canada on.

      I drive at my normal speed of 160 to 210 Km/m here on the highway but in the city I am within 10 km of the posted limit. As I am driving the Accura MDX we brought here, many cars zoom by at probably 1.5 times my speed and those are not only BMWs, Mercedes and Audis. People go fast in everything, from VWs to Peugeots and so what?

      The system here makes perfect sense and a system that you are proposing is nonsense - limiting people artificially on a road to a speed they already have chosen?

    43. Re:Programmable Number Plates by u17 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My car does not do 100 MPH, you insensitive clod! And at 90 the engine is revved up like crazy while the car ceases to drive stably.

    44. Re:Programmable Number Plates by VoidCrow · · Score: 1

      I've seen them, in a car park and near a MacDonalds, in Newcastle upon Tyne. Car culture is a big thing there - the plates were attached to something like a Subaru WRX, and the driver was playing around with the controller, changing the ID.

    45. Re:Programmable Number Plates by guyminuslife · · Score: 0, Troll

      But those cameras would have been so useful for spotting illegal immigrants!

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    46. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Mad+Hamster · · Score: 1

      I'd ...flash a message at the wanker behind me

      "Don't jizz on me"?

      --
      Yandelvayasna grldenwi stravenka
    47. Re:Programmable Number Plates by WNight · · Score: 1

      No, this is just an example of what goes wrong depending on theft (taxation) to fund your empire.

      Without that you couldn't spend your neighbor's money on bread and circuses.

      Maybe they'd have been broke for a while but that's better than massively in debt.

    48. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The point of posting the speed limit, you ask?

      There will ALWAYS be some few damn fools who think that they are Mario Andretti. Places where everyone else is quite happy to drive 50 mph, he will insist on doing 80 or more. Places where everyone else is doing ~100 mph, he will insist on going 150 or more.

      Remember, we don't have an Autobahn here in the states. There are few places that really are designed to run more than 100mph. There is SOME POINT at which an increase in speed is reckless endangerment, on any and all roadways in the states.

      Those reckless drivers who insist on endangering every single soul that they get close to should be dealt with, and harshly.

      The speed limit isn't to limit the reasonable person who is driving within safe limits - it is only there to enable the cops to identify and cite the less common idiots.

      If the US should ever build the equivalent of the Autobahn, and decide not to post any speed limit at all, I will be among the first to drive it. :^)

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    49. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your idea is stupid, just as you are.

      You don't even explain why the 85th percentile is meaningful.

      You don't understand that roads in the US aren't built to safely support 80, 90, or 100 MPH.

      You have no clue about simple physics. Consider hitting an obstruction at 50 MPH compared to 100 MPH. Speed does kill.

      Man, you are such a moron that you don't even belong on the road.

    50. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      My advice would be to stay off of any highway where the speed limit exceeds 80MPH. And, I've never claimed to be sensitive. Sensitivity has no place in any consideration of the laws of physics. Can't drive 100, stay the hell out of the way of traffic that is going 100+ - it's as simple as that.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    51. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      With this they won't be necessary - it's designed to display warnings for local traffic conditions so it presumably has built-in GPS to know where you are.

      All the cops need to do is wait at major intersections and pull over all the cars whose plate is displaying "SPEEDER!"

      --
      No sig today...
    52. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CA Legislators lack imaginations, ads on everything is a dystopian cliche. Think of all the things you could use a configurable license plate for:

      This->driver was caught for drunk driving at 21 after running into a fencepost, spends 80% of his time 20% above the posted speed limit and brakes for hallucinations, he is having one now involving Paris Hilton, you have tailgating for 45 miles.

    53. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely "The owner of this vehicle is an inconsiderate, arrogant arsehole" would be shorter and do just as well?

    54. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Eternal+Vigilance · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Don't jizz on me"?

      Sounds like the Gadsden Flag of the sexual revolution.

      "Wank Free Or Die"

    55. Re:Programmable Number Plates by OnePumpChump · · Score: 1

      Cops in most jurisdictions in the US don't give bullshit tickets. Speed cameras have no discretion, and have even stronger incentives to hand out tickets.

    56. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Speed and red light cameras become useless too

      Correct. These plates have built in wireless networking that you can't turn off. You would be tracked all the time.

      I can see a huge underground industry built up around this because there's no way in hell what ever "encryption" they use will last.

      The encryption would be cracked, but the tag data would still need to flow to the servers or your car would stick out like a sore thumb to any cops or automated monitoring stations. Fooling the system would be an uphill battle. I'm sure some criminal networks could manage it for awhile, but why would they? There would be so much control that it would be too much risk.

      Right now any organized gang could get machines to stamp their own license plates. Heck, they could hire people in prison to work on the side. This might work in a movie, but in real life this stuff doesn't make sense.

    57. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After you've monitored speeds for a reasonable period of time (remember, I said a month or more - six months seems to long, probably 60 to 90 days is right) you find that 85th percentile, and post that as the speed limit. Go ahead, and round it to the nearest 5 mph, or, if you insist (out of some unfounded fear) round to the next LOWER 5 mph. Post that speed limit now.

      That's all very nice but in places like residential neighborhoods the reason for speed limits is that if you hit somebody at 30kph they are injured, maybe break a bone, but they stand a high chance of complete recovery. If you hit them at a speed that's only 15-20 kph higher they'll probably have to spend a length of time in a hospital. If the victim was a kid it'll probably be dead at that speed. Any higher than 45-50 kph and you are dealing with regular fatalities. If we applied your rule to the place where I live the average speed around from 50 and up to 70kph and nobody would ever stop at a traffic light. There must be a point where people have to swallow the bitter pill that speed limits aren't just designed to annoy and to create opportunities for communes to make money off speed cameras. Talk to anybody who deals with traffic accidents on a regular basis and you'll soon find that out.

    58. Re:Programmable Number Plates by rainmouse · · Score: 5, Informative

      I suppose speed limits of 30 mph in a residential area is purely motivated towards speeding tickets income and nothing to do with the 20% fatality at 30mph vs 40 mph where its 90% fatality rate. Seems like this are speed limits imposed by engineers. Of course now they are pushing for 20mph in residential areas which decreases the chance of death to around 2.5%. Of course you could argue its political when over 3 thousand people in the UK alone are killed on roads each year. You can throw out whatever excuse for driving irresponsibly, but don't think your fooling everyone.

      figures from Sunday Times which may or may not be 100% accurate but they paint a decent picture. http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/transport/article3941769.ece

    59. Re:Programmable Number Plates by thrawn_aj · · Score: 1

      I appreciate your intent and I have also felt the need for that, but I fear it will be used more for "&^#@(&@" than either "sorry" or "thanks". Well, perhaps most of CA could use it well. Just ban it in the vicinity of LA and I'm in.

    60. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the flip side, I'd love a "back off" button I could get to make the plate flash a message at the wanker behind me

      I'd like a "hurry the fuck up" button for my front plate for when I'm stuck behind an idiot like you.

    61. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you also like a picture of your manhood on the rear bumper? Cuz that's about as classy.

    62. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking moron, learn to think for yourself

    63. Re:Programmable Number Plates by julian_t · · Score: 1

      Interesting idea, and surely better than setting limits based on vote-catching, but...

      What about the vast number of people who obviously have no idea whatever about safe stopping distances, or how much damage is done when colliding with someone at 20mph rather than 40?

      It isn't driving at 70/80/100/whatever that worries me per se, it's seeing a string of cars driving at 80 with about 10 feet between them. And most especially, looking in my rearview mirror and seeing one of them behind me. If folks don't know how to drive safely at high speed then they shouldn't be doing so, but lots of people don't seem to be able to judge what is an appropriate speed for the situation.

    64. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, there is. It varies by state to state but there may be laws that prohibit you from putting flashing lights, changing displays, lit displays, etc. based on where you live.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    65. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Far too complicated:

      My solution.

      i) Remove all speed limits from freeways. The idiots that drive too fast and crash - leave em there (actually move them to the side of the road), cars and all, for everyone to see.

      ii) For non-freeway traffic where motorists have to interact with people: No fines just
      3 strikes and you are out:
      a) first time - car impounded for an hour
      b) second time car impounded for a day
      c) thrid time, the driver get the privilege to press the button on the car crusher containing their car.

    66. Re:Programmable Number Plates by thrawn_aj · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't this calibration be flawed unless you didn't post a limit at all for a month or so while you're monitoring things? Unless this has ever been tried before in a relatively average neighborhood with safe outcomes, I would recommend taking a vacation during that month if you happen to live there. Oh, and don't park your car on the street either. I like the basic idea, but the calibration period is a shitstorm waiting to happen. Having said that, I can think of several neighborhoods I've lived and driven in (mostly in the midwest), where it wouldn't be all that bad. It's the coasts that would fuck things up royally, especially NYC and the Bay area and of course (holy roadkill batman) LA.

      There's also the psych aspect to consider. If they'd started with this back when the auto was born, it would work fantastically. But now we're in the sticky situation of having had arbitrary limits on people all their lives and suddenly you take away those limits for a month of calibration and ... carmageddon? I dunno. But like I said, that's when I'm going on vacation =]

    67. Re:Programmable Number Plates by thrawn_aj · · Score: 3, Funny

      If the US should ever build the equivalent of the Autobahn, and decide not to post any speed limit at all, I will be among the first to drive it. :^)

      I'd wait a year for the loons to Darwin themselves and then just go out and .... and .... make love to it. Like I said in a previous post, take away limits that people have lived under all their lives and the first expression of that newfound freedom is likely to be ... unwise.

    68. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They need not concern with me. I've abandoned lead birdshot a long time ago. Now I do all my duck hunting using depleted uranium pellets.

    69. Re:Programmable Number Plates by thrawn_aj · · Score: 1

      Hope not. Cause having a scrolling billboard in front of you all the time will do wonders for road safety. Why not just erect a pole on each car and have strippers dancing on the roof? This whole e-ad thing and it's roadkill aftermath would make a wonderful ad campaign for kicking out all the incumbents in the next election.

    70. Re:Programmable Number Plates by thrawn_aj · · Score: 2, Funny

      So I can just imagine what the first hacker is going to draw on a plate.

      8008135 ?

    71. Re:Programmable Number Plates by swamp_ig · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem with this approach is most people's *perception* of a reasonable speed limit is incorrect.

      For an individual major accidents are a highly unusual occourance, hence the feeling of 'too fast' is strongly associated with whatever you're used to. Remember back to when you were first driving, and how everything seemed too fast? You soon got used to it.

      Unfortunatly e=mv^2 is not your friend. At high speeds that huge amount of energy turns a fender bender into a 6 month stay in hospital and two years of rehab for the survivors.

    72. Re:Programmable Number Plates by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Car stopped and < 30 mph = your 'real' number.

      The bit "Car stopped and" is redundant. You mean to say:

      < 30 mph = your 'real' number.

      (If I were Linus' teacher I'd give you an F.) (But I'm not.)

      --

      I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    73. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Wank Free Or Die"

      That would be the end of slashdot.
      They would die before they would stop wanking.

    74. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Macrat · · Score: 1

      The speed limit isn't to limit the reasonable person who is driving within safe limits - it is only there to enable the cops to identify and cite the less common idiots.

      In Monterey California, the speed limit is lower on their section of Hwy 101 from the rest of 101 and it is used as a 24x7 ticket revenue stream.

    75. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll slow down as soon as the speed limits are set by engineers and not politicians and people with a monetary stake in the revenue from tickets resulting from said limits.

      I guess I shouldn't be surprised to find armchair comments like this here, but let me just say that there probably is a fairly large amount of people out there that believe there is at least _some_ social aspect to setting a speed limit.

      From an engineering POV, most any street is capable of handling cars doing > 90 MPH, but unless you live in Monte Carlo, you probably are not going to expect people driving by your front door at that speed.

      I mean, it sounds great as a sound bite, but how exactly are engineers going to set speed limits? And how aren't there going to be endless debates about the validity of those rules?

      (I read the guy talking about the 85% rule, which is cute, but anyone having done even a tiny bit in statistics knows how silly, or rather open for big errors, that is)

    76. Re:Programmable Number Plates by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      Ha!

    77. Re:Programmable Number Plates by hedwards · · Score: 3, Funny

      I thought that was "Wank Free or Die Hard."

    78. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe California should push a states' rights/limited federal government agenda to correct this disparity? Oh wait, it is only those in Kansas and other flyover states that are being led astray from their economic interests due to their ignorance.

    79. Re:Programmable Number Plates by dargaud · · Score: 1

      While I generally agree with your formula and reasoning behind it, I can see some places it doesn't seem to apply well. Example: the mountain road I take between home and work. People who commute on it (me included) drive way too fast after a while. If there's a deer or a slab of ice behind the curve: bang. Your percentile method would be raised too high by the many commuters (while being kept too low by the fat campers' trailers on the WEs, OK, I get your point). My point is that some of those commuters are better kept on their toes by the regular presence of speed traps. I just hope I won't have to regret my words soon !

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    80. Re:Programmable Number Plates by hedwards · · Score: 1

      What could possibly go wrong? I mean it's not like those freeway message boards ever get cracked.

    81. Re:Programmable Number Plates by hedwards · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's too be expected. In general the blue states pay for running the federal government, but it's typically the red states that whine and demand tax breaks. California, New York and almost certainly Florida would be paying more than they're getting. Here in WA we've got the same problem on the state level. The vast majority of the taxes come from the west of the cascades, but east of the cascades is where most of the support for hobbling government and the ability to pay for things the voters demanded is supported.

    82. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      I need not explain how or why the 85th percentile is meaningful. It has been explained by TRAFFIC ENGINEERS. Do you fear Google? Do you fear knowledge? Do you fear thinking for yourself?

      Don't spout stupidities - google for the info that you're ignorant of.

      Speed has never killed anyone, in all of history. Sudden changes in inertia have killed a lot of people, but if speed killed, than we wouldn't have very many pilots who survived mach1, let alone mach 3 speeds.

      http://www.motorists.org/speedlimits/
      "Numerous studies have shown that the 85th percentile is the safest possible level at which to set a speed limit. "

      https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Speed_limit
      "The speed limit is commonly set at or below the '85th percentile speed' (which is the speed at which 85% of the traffic is travelling)[24] and in the USA is typically set 8 to 12 mph (13 to 19 km/h) below that speed.[25] A 1997 study carried out in Michigan, USA showed that drivers "drive at speeds that they feel are appropriate, apparently independent of the posted speed"[26] A speed limit that is considered to have been set arbitrarily slow can be difficult to enforce."

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    83. Re:Programmable Number Plates by ericrost · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here's a very edifying collection of those statistics. The "libertarians" amongst us are actually receiving the most benefit from our socialist policies, while the "socialists" amongst us are actually those that are quite self sufficient.

      http://www.good.is/post/the-anti-tax-states-get-a-great-deal-on-taxes/

    84. Re:Programmable Number Plates by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

      Nothing you quoted suggested kicking California out of the Union.
      Nothing you posted serves as a justification for continued out-of-control spending by the State of California or the Federal Government.

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    85. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There WILL be some idiots who drive to fast - just let them, they are part of the formula.

      (remember, I said a month or more - six months seems to long, probably 60 to 90 days is right)

      If you are going to write an essay, atleast spellcheck it.

      Yours faithfully,
      Grammer Nazi

    86. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing you posted serves as a justification for continued out-of-control spending by the State of California or the Federal Government.

      I agree with you on this. Cut military spending 80% and cancel out all drug laws. Yay, spending is in control now.

    87. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Myopic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The California state legislature throws stupid stuff like this around all the time. It never goes anywhere. They don't do it because they want to pass the law. They do it because there is some wealthy business behind it.

      That is a motherfucking stupid reason to vote for or pass a bill. It borders on treason.

      My apologies for the profanity.

    88. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, I'm not so sure - case in point, there's a road on my journey home with great visibility, little traffic, no obvious hazards (it's on the very outskirts of my city, no schools, etc, no footpaths, there are woods on both sides and a path cuts across it but the visibility is several hundred yards in both directions) - the limit on this road is 40MPH. It makes absolutely no sense whatsoever, you could comfortably drive along it at 50-60MPH, and many folk do, even knowing if they get stopped they'll get punished pretty harshly, but even so there is a sharp drop off at 60, I've never seen people do anything like 70 on it even (I'm sure there is the odd exception from time to time). Mostly people make a reasonable job of driving within their limitations, even in situations where they're already exceeding the speed limit and there's nothing to stop them exceeding it further, so I have to imagine this would be the case if the limits weren't there. The obvious caveat is young guys with something to prove, but maybe some system of limiting specific classes of drivers but letting the rest of us just get on with it would work.

    89. Re:Programmable Number Plates by HopefulIntern · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I find that saying thanks is easy (a hand gesture such as a wave is quite sufficient if someone lets you pass or lets you in), but how do you gesture "sorry" to someone? I try to be a sensible driver but sometimes I do make mistakes, and I will be the first to admit that I am in the wrong. It would be nice to have some way of acknowledging that you did something stupid; certainly if I was the one getting cut off and the person said sorry I would feel a lot better.

    90. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      210 Km/m here on the highway but in the city I am within 10 km of the posted limit. As I am driving the Accura MDX we brought here, many cars zoom by at probably 1.5 times my speed and those are not only BMWs, Mercedes and Audis.

      There's a gentlemen's agreement among German manufacturers that their cars are electronically limited to 300 kph (155 mph).

      Porsche, I believe, are an exception. This probably explains why the only time I see a Cayenne that isn't driven by an asshat is when it's parked.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    91. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, the minuscule amount of time it takes for you to tell the license plate what to say is that much time spent NOT paying attention to driving. Same for reading others' plates.

      Didn't we just ban texting while driving somewhere?

    92. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      If the US should ever build the equivalent of the Autobahn, and decide not to post any speed limit at all, I will be among the first to drive it. :^)

      I thought there already was, but it's in Montana/Idaho or the like, where there's no reason to go anyway.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    93. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lead shot flakes upon hitting the target. These tiny flakes hugely increase the surface area for absorption. This doesn't matter for the creature that's been hit (which dies of trauma), but matters for the scavenger that ingests its corpse.

    94. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I would have thought that with the limit at 30, unless someone actually leapt out infront of your car, you're not going to hit them at 30, anyway. So the fatality rate within a 30 limit will be significantly less than 20%.

    95. Re:Programmable Number Plates by internewt · · Score: 1

      On the flip side, I'd love a "back off" button I could get to make the plate flash a message at the wanker behind me

      I'd like a "hurry the fuck up" button for my front plate for when I'm stuck behind an idiot like you.

      What works nicely to get tailgaters off your arse is to speed up and slow down a couple of mph either side of the limit. No brakes, just let your speed drift up and down with the gas pedal alone.

      Oscillate your speed at the right rate, and you can probably make the guy behind have to slam his brakes on a couple of times. They will either slow down and back off, or get incredibly pissed off and overtake.

      The 2nd time I ever used this technique to deal with a tailgater, the guy behind honked on the first speed oscillation, and tried to drive closer. On the 2nd he overtook, but on the crest of a hill, with a cross roads on!

      I think this just illustrates the kind of intellect of people who tailgate. Who in their right mind overtakes on a blind crest, with 2 junctions? Well, the kind of person who think they are more important on the roads than everyone else.

      --
      Car analogies break down.
    96. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And I hope someone runs over your kids while speeding in a built up area just so you know what it feels like.

      Would it feel like I'd failed to teach my kids not to play in the road or failed to teach them how to safely cross one? Would it feel like I'd failed to explain the danger of large, heavy objects moving at speed? You're right, far better to limit everyone in their actions all the time so that I don't have to fulfil my duties as a responsible parent.

    97. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Things like the military spend money that's not in individual states. I suspect that these kinds of things are more than 20% of the federal budget (though I might be wrong).

      I'd also say that it seems unfortunate that the federal government is involved in the money stream for the part that's going back - it concentrates power too much, giving a too big target for lobbying.

    98. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      I support team goatse.

      Like this person?

      I love the "See it from the sky" line.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    99. Re:Programmable Number Plates by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      The slow, oblivious drivers never look in their mirrors, so a light on your front plate would never be seen. Likely they don't even know your car is there.

      In that case, rocket launchers, machine guns, or some other type of offensive weaponry behind the headlights would be much more effective. Think early James Bond, or XXX. (Not porn, you bunch of wankers. The Vin Diesel movie!)

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    100. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alternately, you could just ask the guy who designed the road. Strangely enough, the average speed on most roads happens to fall pretty damn close to the design speed. As in the speed the road is mathematically designed to be most comfortable to drive on.

      On topic: I have no problem with an ad on my license plate on 2 conditions: 1) I get to pick what its an ad for and 2) I get paid for allowing a company to use my property as a billboard.

    101. Re:Programmable Number Plates by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      It has been proven many times over, the slower you go in a built up area, the less critical and minor accidents occur.

      Then let's make the speed limit 5 mph. That's logical, right?

    102. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speed limits were created based on population densities of streets, braking distances, human reaction time and worse-case scenario's. Additionally, there's a safe turn radius for all cars at a certain speeds; changing direction 90 degree's in 200ft is not safe at 100mph compared to 2000ft at 35mph.

      As a car goes faster the braking distance grows exponentially, thus the safe following distance must increase exponentially.

      As car population density increases for streets, you either go slower or reduce following distances; more cars and less total distance means your following distances are forcibly reduced, thus speed must be foricbly reduced to increase percieved saftey. Some function of those two are ideal; if you slow down, following distance has to be less, if you reduce following distances, you slow down.

      Where nobody is on the roadways, nobody is going to care if you are going 100 in a 50 unless it's DUMB, which in almost all instances, it is because a light is going to turn red before you can stop, or someone's going to stall their car, or someone's going to cut you off, or you're going to take a turn too hot n' heavy because you don't know the territory...do I have to continue?

      "Oh well gee, bad stuff never happens on the road! That's unpractical!"; If a deer jots onto the highway or someone's muffler falls off, or a SUV blows a tire and turns on its back, will everyone be able to stop and manuver in time? The reason I refuse to use the highway (save for a few very choice conditions) is because I'll have 20 cars behind me tailgating each other at a carlength apart, 20 cars ahead of me doing the same, I'll have 6 carlengths and people in the lane over will cut me off to get (wheeee retarded) 5 FUCKING car lengths ahead of where they were.

      YOU ARE A FUCKING MORON IF YOU THINK YOU CAN GO FASTER THAN THE SPEED OF TRAFFIC WHEN 100 TIMES AS MANY PEOPLE ARE ON THE ROADS YOU FUCKING DOUCHE! CUTTING PEOPLE OFF WITH 3 INCHES BETWEEN CARS TO GET A FEW CAR LENGTHS AHEAD IS FUCKING STUPID; YOU ARE GOING TO GET YOURSELF AND SOMEONE ELSE KILLED. YOU ARE AN 16-YEAR OLD FUCKSTICK THAT IS STILL THINKS HE'S INVINCIBLE AND HAS NO FUCKING EXPERIENCE. Slow the FUCK down, wear your god-damn seat belt, turn off the loud fucking music, get off the damn cell phone and pay attention before I put quarter inch steel plate on my old 80's brougham and run your ASS down. Talk to a cop; they get to go to crash scene's all the time where someone's not walking ever again and, hey, some kids are swarming the car with their cellphone taking a recording of it for the sake of social entertainment.

      BTW, cops pull you over for driving stupid or to make quota's, usually to make quota's and when they do it, there are certain speed trap zones they use where they know they can write 100 tickets an hour. Can you go faster safely in certain areas? Yep, for sure, but then again the people in those areas would rather have you going slow so you don't hit their retarded children, hence the reason most residential zones are 25-35mph. Street I live on has 10 families and their rugrats are running around at all hours of the day and night; I'd rather not hit one so when I see one thinking "WOOO STREET COOOL" I slow down to a stop until they point their trike in the other direction.

      The BIG problem is in cities where everyone goes "yeah yeah, look I'm going to tailgate you because if I don't this douche to my right is going to cut me off, then the guy behind him and so on and blah blah blah".
      http://www2.wnct.com/news/2008/dec/22/12_car_pileup_in_chicago_area_stalls_traffic-ar-32380/

      The fundemental problem is we build our roadways for convenience, then we build f-ing strip malls, f-ing apartment buildings, and other f-ing SHIT we don't need between point A and point B right at the road which requires a massive network of red lights, reductions in speed limits because of density increases, and zoning requirements. THEN when you try to ADD lanes, guess what? Nobody wants to give up their front lawn or an

    103. Re:Programmable Number Plates by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > Average Joe cannot be required to know how to maintain an "eAd plate"

      Of course not. The ticket the cop gives you will require that you have it fixed by a state-licensed mechanic at your expense.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    104. Re:Programmable Number Plates by internewt · · Score: 1

      The thinking distance at 30mph is 30 feet, so if someone steps out from behind a parked van, or something, less than 30 feet away from you, you will probably hit them before your foot hits the brake pedal.

      Of course, sensible drivers will realise that there is a blind obstruction coming, and will either slow down, or take steps to minimise problems if someone does step out: like crossing the centre line, if it's safe to.

      --
      Car analogies break down.
    105. Re:Programmable Number Plates by stewbacca · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The point of posting speed limits it is to keep most traffic driving at roughly the same speed. I absolutely agree with your suggestion to remove speed recommendations altogether (having lived in Germany myself, and clearly understanding where you are coming from), but that will NEVER happen in America. We are uptight, conservative and lack proper driver's education.

      Also, the Autobahn is engineered with minimum inclines and declines and beautifully engineered equal-radius corners. US highways are engineered to cut around the path of least resistance and for the least amount of money. This leads to wild changes in elevation and dangerous increasing-radius corners, to go along with our giant, crappy cars with their non-handling cloud suspensions and our uneducated drivers.

    106. Re:Programmable Number Plates by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Places where everyone else is quite happy to drive 50 mph, he will insist on doing 80 or more. Places where everyone else is doing ~100 mph, he will insist on going 150 or more.

      This is simply not true. Car and Driver cites a study (too lazy to look for it now, but I've read about it for 20 years going now) that yes, people will driver faster than posted speeds, but as speeds increase, the amount faster people are willing to drive approaches zero. This law of diminishing returns, so to speak, proves more that people will only drive at what feels safe and that speed limits (highways, specifically) are set artificially low. Cynics will say it's for revenue (I partially agree), but others will say there's a lot of conservatism built into the lower speed (I also agree that is a cause). Better safe than sorry, right?

      I think the consensus now days is that 70 mph highways, during daylight and light traffic, are perfectly save around 90-100 mph for most cars and drivers' skill.

    107. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Conversely, the guy who steps out in front of a vehicle going 30mph, when it is less than 30 feet away, only does so once. Statistic collected, but now worthless.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    108. Re:Programmable Number Plates by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Montana eliminated their day-time no speed limit. The federal government withholds funding if you don't post. I hear they really don't enforce the new speed limit though.

    109. Re:Programmable Number Plates by delinear · · Score: 1

      They need not concern with me. I've abandoned lead birdshot a long time ago. Now I do all my duck hunting using depleted uranium pellets.

      Don't pass up the obligatory: "I don't go anywhere without my mutated anthrax. For duck huntin'."

    110. Re:Programmable Number Plates by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      I'll slow down as soon as the speed limits are set by engineers and not politicians and people with a monetary stake in the revenue from tickets resulting from said limits.

      That and raising speed limits on freeways to get people home faster because if the police say that speeding is the number one cause of road fatalities then driver fatigue is certainly the number two cause.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    111. Re:Programmable Number Plates by nmg196 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      They're not set by engineers or politicians. They're set by highways agencies who have the stats on how many people are killed on those road types or in the area immediately surrounding the camera. Do you know how much more dangerous it is to drive at 40mph than 30mph in terms of pedestrian casualties? If not, look it up - you will be surprised!

      I'm fed up with naïve people who think these things are just cash machines on sticks, mainly because with almost no exceptions they are people who drive like twats themselves.

    112. Re:Programmable Number Plates by internewt · · Score: 1

      Lead used for roofing material isn't too bad, as it reacts with the air, and acid in rain, to form an unreactive oxide and salt coating that keeps most of the lead itself out of the way of nature.

      But lead in physically small pieces can be eaten by birds (as already explained in this thread), and the stomach acid will react with probably the whole piece of lead, meaning it will be absorbed by the body.

      Just because there is a worse way of releasing lead into the environment than bullets (through the use of tetraethyl lead as an anti-knocking agent), doesn't mean that leaving little bits of lead lying about is a good idea.

      But meat killed with lead bullets does have a certain sweetness to it ;)

      --
      Car analogies break down.
    113. Re:Programmable Number Plates by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      No, that'll never happen. Using mobiles while driving is illegal, don't you know.

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    114. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      Obviously you've never been to either as there are many beautiful spots in both states.

      Montana has the freeway you're thinking about. Speed limit was noted but always with the note that it had to be reasonable and prudent. In recent years, due to the Feds pulling highway funding, the state has started enforcing the limit.

      Still, Bear Tooth Pass, Glacier National Park, Sawtooth Mountains, Coeur d'Alene, Craters of the Moon, Snake River basin, Snake River canyon. You need to go for a visit.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    115. Re:Programmable Number Plates by toygeek · · Score: 1

      You don't happen to live in Palm Springs do you? Maybe you'll remember me. I was that guy always walking as fast as I could away from you.

      Seriously though, this is how you'll end up with license plates with vanity ads like "I'm not gay... but my boyfriend is!"

    116. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      I'm with you there. I do ride a high speed sportbike though. The bike feels a lot more stable at 80mph or so.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    117. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually that makes sense. Who's better to make these license plates? A little over qualified... perhaps.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    118. Re:Programmable Number Plates by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Note, for reference, that there are places where there are no speed limits on highways in the USA. Montana comes to mind....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    119. Re:Programmable Number Plates by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

      You haven't done your math, and you haven't reviewed the growth history of entitlement programs.

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    120. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      6 more words : Super-majority required for tax increases.

      Uh, they got the 2/3 majority last year and passed the largest state tax increase in US history. Were you asleep? They did this in the middle of a recession. There are small children in tribes in the Amazon jungle who have never had contact with modern civilization who know that won't work. Guess what? It didn't. Do you just raise taxes to 100%? When do you start trying something else?

      19 more words: Vast segments of the budget considered untouchable because the public employee unions own the legislature lock, stock and barrel.

      I can't disagree on the ballot measures, but they are not the bulk of the problem.

    121. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Turken · · Score: 1

      Nothing wrong with driving slow in residential areas, especially in the UK where the roads are rarely straight and long.

      But on the US interstate system, many of the highways do have artificially low speed limits that really should be raised. Further evidence of the arbitrary nature of the limits is when you see the speed limit change by 5-10 mph simply because you passed over an invisible state line. The road is identical on either side of the state line, and is engineered to handle speeds much higher than either, but the actual limits differ due to policies set by the state politicians.

      And again, these are wide open interstate highways where pedestrians and non-motorized vehicles are generally prohibited to begin with, and which typically have minimum speed limits in excess of 40 mph and it's 90% fatality rate.

    122. Re:Programmable Number Plates by ifrag · · Score: 1

      certainly if I was the one getting cut off and the person said sorry I would feel a lot better.

      Careful... that could set a bad precedent. Soon everyone will be cutting people off all the time and simply displaying "sorry" like now it's OK. I don't want "sorry", I want people to drive like they are not the most important car on the road.

      --
      Fear is the mind killer.
    123. Re:Programmable Number Plates by John+Hasler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      An acquaintance who worked for one those agencies for forty years assures me that the primary consideration in setting speed limits is revenue. The bureaucrats ask the engineers what the optimum safe speed is and then set the limit as far below that as they think the voters will tolerate. He says that unrealistically-low limits increase accident rates by increasing the speed dispersion.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    124. Re:Programmable Number Plates by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      Libertarian != Republican.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    125. Re:Programmable Number Plates by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Roads are built to code, they are designed to handle cars at the speed politicians have set with a margin for idiots.

      That's what they want you to think. But consider this:

      Roads were designed and speed limits set in most cases over 50 years ago, when cars were much larger and heavier, in a lot of cases had 4 wheel drum brakes (read: can't stop for shit) poorer tires, poorer handling, poorer visibility, etc.etc.etc.
      Now, we have smaller cars, 4 wheel anti-lock disc brakes, traction control, proximity warning systems, low profile tires and improved suspensions for better handling, acres of canopy glass....and piles of stuff I haven't thought of.

      Now....with all those changes, you're telling me that the maximum safe speed on a given roadway hasn't changed at all in 50 years?

      Yes, there are more cars on the road now, too, but freeways have also been widened in most cases since then.

      Let's look at it another way:

      In SW Ontario, there are a lot of county roads that have speed limits of 90 km/h. These roads have driveways, stop signs, intersections, no minimum speed limits, and allow bicycles, tractors, and other slow moving traffic, not to mention having opposing traffic only 3-4 feet away in the opposing lane, moving at a relative 180 km/h.

      You can get onto a freeway, and eliminate all those dangers, and it significantly increases the safe speed you can drive, to.....100 km/h.

      So, you get rid of all that stuff, and it's only safe to drive 10 km/h faster? Who's kidding who?

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    126. Re:Programmable Number Plates by TheGatesofBill · · Score: 1

      I hear the fatality rate is 0% at 0mph...

    127. Re:Programmable Number Plates by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      Roads built today are built that way.

      Most of the nations highway infrastructure, especially the bits that go over really dangerous terrain like mountains, was built before anyone cared about automobile safety.

    128. Re:Programmable Number Plates by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It has been proven many times over, the slower you go in a built up area, the less critical and minor accidents occur.

      Among all drivers? Or only the crappy ones?

      All those studies are biased in their selection, in that only people who get into accidents are selected.

      They don't prove that accidents happen because of speed. They prove that people who are likely to get into accidents are more likely to get into accidents at higher speeds. They demonstrate nothing about drivers who are not likely to get into accidents in the first place.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    129. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drag increases with the cube of the velocity. Higher speeds lead to much greater fuel usage and emissions. Why do you hate the planet?

    130. Re:Programmable Number Plates by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of something more along the lines of a hack to dim the contrast drastically when a bright flash is detected, but that actually might work just as well... albeit it would require an extra input (speed), which might be a more difficult hard-hack.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    131. Re:Programmable Number Plates by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      Another part of the problem is that when we decided we needed speed limits, traveling 80mph in anything but the newest Porsche was truly reckless.

      Automobile technology has increased a ton ... yet, if we're lucky, we've gone from max 55mph to 65 mph speed limits.

    132. Re:Programmable Number Plates by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      What a fantastical, magical fairy world you live in. Can I come and stay for a while?

      The road near my house is perfectly capable of withstanding traffic at 50mph. It's set at 25mph, but reasonably so because it's a residential area. So I obey that speed limit. But the main thoroughfare that's nearby that is only 35, everyone drives down it at 45. Because the road can handle that, it's only near the end of the month when the cops are trying to hit their quotas that people slow down.

    133. Re:Programmable Number Plates by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      How about, STOP SPENDING SO MUCH MONEY? ... They have nothing better to worry about? ... Time well spent, you goofs. ... Glad to see they have their priorities straight.

      They obviously have more money than they know what to do with... I’m accepting donations, they should’ve just asked.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    134. Re:Programmable Number Plates by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      When the state supreme court ruled that it was unconstitutional to issue any speeding tickets on uncontrolled roads, Montana instituted maximum 75 mph statutory speed limits on all roads.

      wiki link

    135. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In order for your desire to be met, we would have had to have been telling kids for the last few years that they weren't the most important person on earth. This is verboten in modern education and parenting, because as all the "experts" will tell you, you'll hurt little Johnny or Suzie's self esteem if you try to tell them something like that.

      I'm doing my best to raise my daughters to be empathetic and give them the ability to see the other person's point of view. But from my general experience of their peers and their peers parents, apparently for the last 30 years the number one thing parents have been teaching most kids is "YOU are the center of the universe"

    136. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      For instance, there is absolutely NO REASON to put a 6 lane highway through a school zone - or, conversely, to build a school on a 6 lane highway. Depending on which was built first, whoever designed and built the latter structure was a complete MORON!!

      I hesitate to agree due to legacy and new build concerns - I can see building said highway next to a school ending up being the most logical. But then, I'd include managing the school's traffic as part of the plan - putting a pedestrian bridge or tunnel up, for example.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    137. Re:Programmable Number Plates by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Most people don't complain about the residential area speed limits. Those are reasonable, and people mostly follow them. The speed limits that are objectionable are the main thoroughfares without residences that are still absurdly low limits.

    138. Re:Programmable Number Plates by mog007 · · Score: 1

      That's not even CLOSE to treason. From the Constitution: "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort."

      The reason that it's the only crime actually defined in the Constitution? The Kings of England were quite happy to charge people with treason when they pissed him off. Yes, this is a retarded law, and if the GP's reason about the motivation is true, then the motivation is wrong. But it's NOT treason.

    139. Re:Programmable Number Plates by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Case in point.
      There is a street in Roseville, CA that was 50, then changed to 45, and now is 40. There are three hideouts where a motor cop can see you without being seen until it's too late. On any given day at least one of those is manned.

      The city of Citrus Heights, CA lowered the max speed on *all* surface streets to 40, including streets that are 50 on either side of the city. This was claimed to be to reduce accidents. #1 accident in CH is red-light violations, not speed related accidents.

      Anyone who claims that this is not revenue generation is ignorant or dim.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    140. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      What is the point of posting a speed limit at a limit that is already natural to 85% of people on that road? WHY POST IT?

      First, the 85% level is that 85% of people drive at or below that level. Not that 85% drive at that speed.

      As for posting it - differences in speed cause more accidents than speeding alone. As a psychological matter, by posting the speeds even more people will actually follow it, resulting in a smaller deviation of speed. It also gives you legitimate reason to bust those driving too fast for conditions, or even too slow.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    141. Re:Programmable Number Plates by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      Well, just to take the piss out of you for this, but your statement implies that nobody ever dies in a car that's involved in an accident while not moving, which is provably not true.

      Virg

    142. Re:Programmable Number Plates by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      The US's defense spending is ~$800 billion dollars. Cut that by 80% and the $400 to $500 billion deficit goes away.

      I'm not saying that this is a reasonable proposal, and I'm well aware that the combined medicare/social security spending is about 200% of defense spending, but his math does work out.

    143. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they up the state income tax to 150%, I'm moving.

    144. Re:Programmable Number Plates by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      When the state supreme court ruled that it was unconstitutional to issue any speeding tickets on uncontrolled roads, Montana instituted maximum 75 mph statutory speed limits on all roads.

      Bite me! I was hoping to be able to really cut loose crossing Montana later this summer....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    145. Re:Programmable Number Plates by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      Without that you couldn't spend your neighbor's money on bread and circuses.

      Or, you know, national defense, public spaces, public roads, or responding to pesky things like 150 million gallons of crude oil in a public waterway.

    146. Re:Programmable Number Plates by blueZ3 · · Score: 1

      [...] dangerous increasing-radius corners

      I think you mean decreasing radius turns. Turns that get "less sharp" aren't as difficult to manage as turns that get sharper. As I posted elsewhere, there's a freeway on ramp in south San Jose with a decreasing radius turn where there are two or three motorcycle accidents each year.

      --
      Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    147. Re:Programmable Number Plates by ArcCoyote · · Score: 1

      Has anyone ever considered the idea of graduated speed limits? 65 MPH in the right lane, then 70,75, up to 80 MPH in the left. Print the speed limits in the lane every 1/4 mile or so, and enforce them with respect to the flow of traffic. If you're doing 55 MPH in the wide open left lane, you get a ticket, same if you're doing 85 MPH in the right.

    148. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Tlosk · · Score: 1

      ...CA sent ~$286,627,000,000 to the Federal Government, on the other hand they received ~$242,023,000,000 dollars worth of federal funding. I'd just like to note that this represents a 44.6 billion dollar disparity.

      Ok let me see if I understand you correctly, you're saying that CA, dollar for dollar, got back 85% of the money it paid in federal taxes. So 15% of that money has gone "missing" and you seem to be implying that the only equitable thing is for CA to get back 100% of the money it sent to DC (or perhaps more than 100% wouldn't cause any frowns either right?).

      Are you suggesting that people that live in CA should have no part in paying for the two wars we are involved with? That California shouldn't pay for any of the government structure/personnel in Washington DC? That the IRS should figure out a way to do its job without spending any of the money it collects on infrastructure and employees?

      I don't disagree with your assessment of CA state tax/spending issues, but what is the magic number you suggest states should get to for dollar in dollar out for federal taxes? Fifteen percent doesn't seem to be to be outside reasonable bounds given our current situation and commitments on the federal level.

    149. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Golddess · · Score: 1

      I am driving in Germany for the past half a year, and there is nothing special about the Autobahn that makes it so much different from most US/Canadian highways, in fact Autobahn is much more narrow than many highways that I normally drive in Canada on.

      Also, the autobahn is supposed to be a much sturdier road. Thicker, able to take more weight, less likely to develop pot holes, and when pot holes do start to develop I believe they tend to be quickly repaired.

      Source, Modern Marvels on The History Channel.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    150. Re:Programmable Number Plates by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, ban texting, but I'd like to display basic messages at the push of a button.

      For example, if I cut somebody off, then I want to admit that I was wrong, by pressing a button, and then a display lights up, displaying, "Sorry!".

    151. Re:Programmable Number Plates by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      I see your point, but what about a display with non-customizable messages?

      :^D I understood your second sentence only right now. That's good.

    152. Re:Programmable Number Plates by operagost · · Score: 1
      Well, besides the fact that those are UK figures, in the USA we already have lots of school zones that direct you to slow to an absurd FIFTEEN MPH when flashing-- which is often at the wrong times, such as when school isn't even in session. I'm not really quite sure who you're responding to on this, but most of our residential streets are already at 25-35 MPH. Unfortunately, politics have set limits as low as 25 on wide highways-- some with medians, signalled crosswalks, multiple lanes, etc. This is revenue generation.

      Hey, I can get numbers to do tricks too... maybe pedestrians have a much lower fatality rate when hit at 20, but when I'm going only 20 I take longer to traverse the area and thereby increase the probability of having an accident. Sounds like something for the Freakanomics guy to look into!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    153. Re:Programmable Number Plates by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      Yeah. If they cut me off and try to give thanks, then it only makes me feel worse.

      The technology won't eliminate problems, but it would help.

    154. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen people going 100km/h on ICE, just because they were following someone else and the speed limit is 100km/h. On fucking black ICE. What was the safe speed on a highway on black ice? How about 60km/h tops?

      People are retarded and don't *know* what is a safe speed. They are told by signs what is the maximum speed they should travel at during *ideal* conditions.. Now, how about you google for some videos of crashes of idiots in dense fog, ice, or freezing rain. Yes, there are people that will NOT slow down even if they can't see shit because of fog or rain or bad winter conditions. Then you have 200 of these douchebags crashing their cages because they don't have common sense of slowing the fuck down.

    155. Re:Programmable Number Plates by srmalloy · · Score: 1

      Speed and red light cameras become useless too, I can see a huge underground industry built up around this because there's no way in hell what ever "encryption" they use will last.

      RTFA and the proposed legislation -- the electronic billboard would only replace the rear plate; speed and red-light cameras that take a picture of the front of your car would not be affected.

    156. Re:Programmable Number Plates by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Would you also like a picture of your manhood on the rear bumper? Cuz that's about as classy.

      Truck Nutz?

    157. Re:Programmable Number Plates by eth1 · · Score: 1

      So, do you set the speed limit to something safe for all those mobile junk heaps with crappy tires and suspension that can barely pass inspection, but which causes the Corvette drivers to fall asleep?

      Or something that won't annoy people with decent cars, but will have the junk heaps coming apart/losing control?

    158. Re:Programmable Number Plates by sexconker · · Score: 1

      In Monterey California, the speed limit is lower on their section of Hwy 101 from the rest of 101 and it is used as a 24x7 ticket revenue stream.

      In Hollywood California, the speed limit is lower on their section of Hwy 101 from the rest of 101 and it is used as a 24x7 parking lot.

    159. Re:Programmable Number Plates by AthleteMusicianNerd · · Score: 1

      The oddball who INSISTS that he is going to drive 10 to 30 mile over the speed limit is an utter moron, and he needs to be taken to court, fined, driver's license suspended, and possibly given some jail time. He has no business on the road.

      The posted limit is 65mph in California. That is so ridiculously slow. 80 - 85 mph is perfectly safe. In fact, I'd argue that going 80+ mph with 5 car lengths of separation on front, back and no one on either side ( i.e. an X ) is WAY safer than going 65mph with 2 inches of separation and cars or trucks on both sides. We should be enforcing safe driving distances more so than slow speeds. I wouldn't even mind if we enforced 1 car length per 10 mph. Although I'd agree there is a speed that is no longer safe, but it's really more about speed differences than total speed. Driving 100+ on the 5 freeway at 3am when there's no traffic isn't really that dangerous.

      We should be ticketing people for following to close or driving side by side (although I believe the CHP does give you a break if you're driving 80 with reasonable safety precautions).

    160. Re:Programmable Number Plates by StopKoolaidPoliticsT · · Score: 1

      California also controls 53 of the 435 voting seats in the House of Representatives, which is the sole federal body that can appropriate money. If Californians have a problem with how much money the federal government takes, they control a good 1/8th of the House. If they prefer local/state control of taxation, like, say, Californians funding California's education system instead of the federal government introducing mandates to get some percentage of Californian tax money back, they have a pretty good start on eliminating such actions in the federal government.

      But Californians, by and large, DON'T want a reduced federal government. They like playing the bully to the other states with their domination through the House and by creating restrictions that, through the sheer size of their economy, forces companies to choose making multiple SKUs (higher costs) or pass California's standards onto the other states (see things like CARB and their vehicular standards). California is also home to a lot of people that advocate the government taxing you so they can spend your money on their philanthropy, so isn't it a bit hypocritical for Californians to complain about the federal government taxing Californians so other people can use California's money for their philanthropy?

      --
      Stop Koolaid Politics
    161. Re:Programmable Number Plates by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Yes, exactly what I meant. I got hung up on trying to describe it and got it backwards.

    162. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/birds/pbpoison/ingested.htm

      Since I don't expect you to actually *read* stuff, here's some points,

      1. If a duck that eats a lead shot does not die, the pellet will disappear from the gizzard in about 20 days, either because it has passed through the gastrointestinal tract or because it has eroded to an undetectable particle in the gizzard. (Even when the pellet passes through the bird's digestive system, ill effects may show up in the form of poorer physical condition or the subsequent death of the bird, or both.) When we find that 5.4 percent of the population sampled at a particular time has ingested lead shot, we imply that those ducks swallowed lead shot within the preceding 20 days. In the next 20 days, therefore, a comparable number of ducks will consume shot, and so on.

      2. At the most conservative estimate, waterfowl spend about 150 days (November 1 through March 30) in migration and on the wintering grounds. These areas are subject to the heaviest hunting pressure and unquestionably contain higher densities of lead shot than the breeding grounds. (Ducks pick up lead shot on northern breeding grounds (Elder 1950), but because of the paucity of data we have omitted those areas from our estimate.)

      3. This 150-day period is equal to 7.5 intervals of 20 days each. Multiplying 5.4 percent by 7.5, we find that as much as 40 percent of the waterfowl population ingests lead shot during a single season of exposure. Because some ducks ingest lead shot, survive, and ingest shot again, this estimate for individuals affected may be high; however, the omission of data on the ingestion of lead shot on breeding grounds and the probable higher rate of ingestion after the hunting season seem to make the 40 percent ingestion rate conservative. In addition, some ducks die of lead poisoning before they are shot and therefore are not included among the 40 percent, a figure that is based on the corrected incidence of shot in gizzards of ducks bagged by hunters.

      Even if you don't give a shit about polluting and killing ducks with lead poising, you do realize where that lead ends up?? In the stomachs of the "hunters" that later kill these lead laden ducks, which then they ingest because leads ends up in the tissue of ducks

      Sadly, this results in retardation before death from kidney failure, thus probably contributing to further contamination of ducks with lead. After all,

      "Lead shot and bullets (especially copper-jacketed bullets) aren't terribly dangerous as far as lead exposure goes"

      There are much better alternatives than lead that are non-toxic to either people or the ducks/geese. It's simply *stupid* to use lead. Your survival does not depend on using lead, heck, it depends on not using it.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead_poisoning#Lead-containing_products
      http://dx.doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0005330

      ABSTRACT

      Human consumers of wildlife killed with lead ammunition may be exposed to health risks associated with lead ingestion. This hypothesis is based on published studies showing elevated blood lead concentrations in subsistence hunter populations, retention of ammunition residues in the tissues of hunter-killed animals, and systemic, cognitive, and behavioral disorders associated with human lead body burdens once considered safe. Our objective was to determine the incidence and bioavailability of lead bullet fragments in hunter-killed venison, a widely-eaten food among hunters and their families. We radiographed 30 eviscerated carcasses of White-tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus) shot by hunters with standard lead-core, copper-jacketed bullets under normal hunting conditions. All carcasses showed metal fragments (geometric mean = 136 fragments, range = 15–409) and widespread fragment dispersion. We took each carcass to a separate meat processor and fluoroscopically scanned the resulting meat packages; fluoroscopy r

    163. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Golddess · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Right, because highway driving and residential driving are completely the same thing.

      GP may not have explicitly stated they were talking about highways, but I cannot believe anyone out there thinks speed limits should be removed everywhere, including residential neighborhoods.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    164. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Golddess · · Score: 1

      Do you know how much more dangerous it is to drive at 40mph than 30mph in terms of pedestrian casualties? [...] I'm fed up with naïve people who think these things are just cash machines on sticks

      That's ok, I'm fed up with people who cannot grasp that highways are not residential roads, and should not be treated as such. :)

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    165. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that it isn't merely an engineering matter. If the road is perfectly straight and flat, what's the engineering-determined speed limit? Somewhere around the speed of sound?

      Human biology and reaction times are at least as important as engineering, which is also why any speed limit for a given safety factor is going to depend on the person. It's also going to depend on the road conditions on a given day, the type of vehicle, etc. Add a decent safety factor for all that and maybe for you the speed limit seems too low, but for the median population/car/road conditions, maybe not. Deal with it.

      So, sure, set up a committee independent of the politicians and other people with a monetary stake in the ticket revenue to avoid that kind of bad feedback, but it better include more people than engineers and people still shouldn't be able to drive at any speed they choose, because some people demonstrably do not know what speed they should be driving at in order to be safe. They're the ones that drive off cliffs or wrap themselves around telephone poles or trees on curves.

    166. Re:Programmable Number Plates by operagost · · Score: 1

      US highways are engineered to cut around the path of least resistance and for the least amount of money. This leads to wild changes in elevation and dangerous increasing-radius corners, to go along with our giant, crappy cars with their non-handling cloud suspensions and our uneducated drivers.

      Can you try driving an American car made after 1980? Seriously, this is ridiculous B.S. Read a Car and Driver some time. The Japanese sedans have the poofy rides now.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    167. Re:Programmable Number Plates by cyberworm · · Score: 1

      Well, it seems silly to prohibit cellphones and bikes until you've actually lived here and experienced the douchebags with phones on their bikes. We have bike lanes along very busy streets. A lot of these people who like talking on their phones are a pretty big hazard to themselves, traffic, and other bicyclists. What's amazing is just how dumb some of these people are. iPhone users with headphones will still hold their phone up with one hand and talk into it, even though the mic is deactivated. Sometimes all you can do is watch and laugh as they always veer toward traffic and then give a finger to the car that honks at them.

      Honestly though, illiteracy is a big problem here. If you want proof, ride your bike down the bike path on the beaches in LA. Even with a sidewalk people will still congregate and walk on the bike path.

    168. Re:Programmable Number Plates by sorak · · Score: 1

      Sadly enough, you're probably right. I'm sure that any attempt to obscure or change your license plate is illegal, but this is something completely new, and not in any way analogous to painting different numbers on an existing plate, or covering the plate with a bumper sticker.

      No sarcasm intended.

    169. Re:Programmable Number Plates by blackraven14250 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Corporations are our enemy, therefore it is treason.

    170. Re:Programmable Number Plates by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Informative

      Also for those who don't know; The California state legislature throws stupid stuff like this around all the time. It never goes anywhere.

      Like any legislative body, the California state legislature has lots of bills introduced, byt most of the more off-the-wall ones never get significant support and don't pass out of committee, much less out of the first house.

      OTOH, this particular measure passed out of the California State Senate without objection and is now being heard by an Assembly committee, so I'm not sure its as unlikely to become law as you suggest.

    171. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      90? Which area is that? Standard is 80 anywhere I have been.

    172. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh...Mostly the speed limits are/have been set by engineers. It is only when people with more money than brains start getting speeding tickets (because they think they are better drivers than everyone else) and complain to their legislators about speed limits too slow and "speed traps", that politics come into play.

    173. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dunno. But it only comes close to being a good idea if the advertizer is paying the entire cost of my vehicle registration. The only reason the likes of NASCAR look like rolling billboards is because the ads are sponsoring the driver/racing team, and I would only think it's fair to demand no less with ads foisted onto my vehicle plate.

      Oh, and I'd be willing to do a few ads elsewhere on my car if somebody would cover my insurance and gas. I park on the street in a busy area and my car is quite visible to many passers by. Why not?

    174. Re:Programmable Number Plates by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      You are dismissing the American Public's love of the giant SUV. Those are the poofiest rides money can buy. I didn't specifically blame US car manufacturers for the poofy ride either--the Japanese trucks and SUVs are just as guilty--just our propensity to buy them.

      This review of the Camry, for example:

      Think of the Camry as a car shot full of Novocain: It won’t hurt, but nothing fun ever happens when you’re numbed up. A pain-free experience could be enough for buyers needing mere transportation, but it isn’t enough for us.

      I do read Car & Driver (the above quote is from C&D). But there are other car magazines and one recent review put it best: The new 2010 Chevy Malibu is the best sedan from GM in years. Unfortunately, it's also the best car you'll ever rent. It also got 7th out of 9, beating out a Kia and a Dodge Avenger. That's nothing to brag about.

      I think with a little perspective (i.e. living in countries that don't have a glut of US-centric giant poofy cars), nobody can fairly claim the US desire for smooth riding, yet poor handling cars has declined over the years just because the US manufacturers offer a few really good models that don't have poofy rides.

    175. Re:Programmable Number Plates by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Depends on your definition of 'safe'. Ultimately you have to decide on an acceptable level of death. Apparently your level is higher than the level of the people setting the speed limits.

    176. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

      On the other end, an "I'm Sorry" button would also be useful.

    177. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

      1. California is one of the wealthiest states in the country. 2. California voters overwhelmingly support highly progressive tax systems and redistributive government spending. For some reason they can't figure out that #1 and #2 lead to 3. California pays in far more than it gets out.

    178. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Uniquitous · · Score: 1

      It filters profanity, however. If that matters to anyone, they'd be better off doing a homebrew.

    179. Re:Programmable Number Plates by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      90? Which area is that? Standard is 80 anywhere I have been.

      http://www.thekingshighway.ca/intro.html
      See the bottom section:

      "The posted speed limit on most rural County Roads is 80 km/h, although some roads in Southwestern Ontario have a posted speed limit of 90 km/h."

      A bit more digging throws up Highway 655

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    180. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      The 400 series highways are significantly different from "a lot of country roads". In fact, there's no way you can consider a 400 a "country road" at all. We call them 400 series and have special restrictions on them for a reason.

      As for the other examples on that page: "Those portions of the King's Highways that have been upgraded to expressways or freeways generally have a posted speed limit of 90 km/h or 100 km/h". Certainly not "lots of country roads".

    181. Re:Programmable Number Plates by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      I never mentioned the 400 series - they just happened to be on the first page I read that mentions 90kph speed limits, something you asked about and I answered. I also supplied details of a specific road with a 90kph speed limit. Apologies if I mistook your "90? Which area is that?" as a direct question seeking more information.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    182. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Script+Cat · · Score: 1

      Who says I would hack my plate.
      Other peoples are much more fun!

    183. Re:Programmable Number Plates by internewt · · Score: 1

      According to rainmouse above, statistically the guy could actually step out 5 times before dying!

      --
      Car analogies break down.
    184. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      I know there are a few highways with higher speed limits. I have driven on a lot of country roads in southwestern Ontario and I do not think I have ever seen one above 80km/h.

      Either the parent was greatly exaggerating speed limits or there is some nook in the region that has higher limits that I have not traveled. Either is possible but I suspect exaggeration.

    185. Re:Programmable Number Plates by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Heres a hint, you don't want the jackass tallgating you to be reading your license plate or bumper sticker. You want him/her paying attention at the very least to your brake lights or the cars in front of you so he/she has a chance of stopping before they end up in your passenger seat holding a conversation with you.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    186. Re:Programmable Number Plates by jhoegl · · Score: 1

      Its not the excessive speeding that politicians are worried about their genius, its the sudden stop when a reckless driver careens into a minivan full of kids and moms.
      You are either really young or very stupid.

    187. Re:Programmable Number Plates by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I think this just illustrates the kind of intellect of people who tailgate.

      You purposefully drove in a manner designed to annoy, and the person got annoyed. And you say that like it's some revelation. When you purposefully try to piss people off, it will likely work.

    188. Re:Programmable Number Plates by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Unless this has ever been tried before in a relatively average neighborhood with safe outcomes, I would recommend taking a vacation during that month if you happen to live there.

      For one, it has been done has has been done many times. They don't post "no limit" signs, that say "the faster you go, the faster the speed limit will be when it's put back up next month."

      And for another, everyone seems to assume that limits are required. If they repealed the limit, would you drive unsafely? If not, why do you assume the same of everyone else? Yes, there are always people that will be stupid. But what they've found is that those people are unaffected by such things. They will be stupid no matter what the sign on the side of the road says. And, changes in the signage may move people around (the stupid might be more likely to take that road), but that means they aren't elsewhere. The increase in one area often corresponds with a greater reduction elsewhere.

      It's like the road humps. They lower the crash rate right around them, as long as all the other paths don't have them. But the other paths get more than a corresponding increase in crashes, indicating that adding humps will cause more harm than it fixes. That, and it slows down emergency response. So you'll not only not be any safer on the road, but in the case of an emergency, you'll be less safe. But people don't care about actual safety, they only care about the appearance of safety.

    189. Re:Programmable Number Plates by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      They need to move back to a market value system for property tax. Their property tax is frozen, and their expenses increase with inflation (or faster) and is the underlying cause of all their problems.

    190. Re:Programmable Number Plates by thrawn_aj · · Score: 1

      For one, it has been done has has been done many times.

      Ah. Please tell me where and when or at least point me to a source. I'm really curious to see some case studies on this (what really happened, etc.)

      They don't post "no limit" signs, that say "the faster you go, the faster the speed limit will be when it's put back up next month."

      What do they post then? Or do they just take off the sign for a stretch of road and give no indication of any change in the limit for that road? Cause that's a seriously flawed calibration (the traffic will simply follow the limit for the previous stretch of road that DID have a posted limit). So, my point is that it will either be dangerous or rather useless. The appearance of a scientifically set limit while being nothing of the kind.

    191. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't the Autobahn have this system where if you are going > 130 (km/h), you are automatically *at least* partially liable for any accident you are involved in, fault or no?

    192. Re:Programmable Number Plates by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      The government is our enemy. Only the non-treasonous are treasonous!

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    193. Re:Programmable Number Plates by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      So..you suspect exaggeration, do you?

      Well:

      Courtright line. Runs east-west just south of Inwood:
      http://maps.google.ca/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=inwood+ontario&sll=49.891235,-97.15369&sspn=25.940006,86.572266&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=Inwood,+Lambton+County,+Ontario&ll=42.805626,-81.982405&spn=0.003597,0.010568&t=h&z=17&layer=c&cbll=42.80563,-81.982196&panoid=5eA9yjZd-xLJQCzE-oqPjw&cbp=12,83.29,,0,5

      Petrolia Line. Runs east-west through Petrolia:
      http://maps.google.ca/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=6544+petrolia+line&sll=42.805626,-81.982201&sspn=0.003629,0.010568&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=6544+Petrolia+Line,+Brooke-Alvinston,+Lambton+County,+Ontario+N0N+1K0&ll=42.879093,-81.982298&spn=0.007186,0.021136&t=h&z=16&layer=c&cbll=42.879091,-81.982178&panoid=J1boEWzIiyGeKuVRn1E02g&cbp=12,88.56,,0,5.55

      Nauvoo Road. Runs north-south through Alvinston. Might need to go fullscreen to see this one, as the sign is a little further away:
      http://maps.google.ca/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=3000+Nauvoo+Road,+Ontario&sll=42.879093,-81.982169&sspn=0.007249,0.021136&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=3000+Nauvoo+Rd,+Brooke-Alvinston,+Lambton+County,+Ontario+N0N+1A0&ll=42.805556,-81.869752&spn=0.007194,0.021136&t=h&z=16&layer=c&cbll=42.805938,-81.869748&panoid=0PbyjNlJ6ESz5OlXiCY4Pw&cbp=12,195.39,,0,3.26

      Glendon Drive. Heads east out of Glencoe, eventually reaching London:
      http://maps.google.ca/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=3986+Glendon+Drive,+Ontario&sll=42.805933,-81.869752&sspn=0.007257,0.021136&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=3986+Glendon+Dr,+Southwest+Middlesex,+Middlesex+County,+Ontario+N0L+1M0&ll=42.75853,-81.702383&spn=0.0072,0.021136&t=h&z=16&layer=c&cbll=42.758668,-81.702192&panoid=Wus3PZtNFatzgf1OpaokkQ&cbp=12,79.71,,0,5.27

      Shaw Road. East of London, runs north-south between highway 2 and the Thames River:

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    194. Re:Programmable Number Plates by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Lambton and Middlesex Counties are both 90 km/h for all (most?) county roads. Provincial highways that didn't get downloaded under Harris are still 80 km/h.
      But all the roads that changed to county ownership immediately went up to 90, with no changes to the road at all, and guess what? Accident rates didn't budge.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    195. Re:Programmable Number Plates by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      So, my point is that it will either be dangerous or rather useless. The appearance of a scientifically set limit while being nothing of the kind.

      My point is that they do it often. And you have no idea how. As such, your uninformed personal opinion doesn't count. It's not like it's a mystery. I'm from Texas, one of the few states that takes its studies seriously (might have something to do with TTI being one of the foremost traffic engineering organizations on the planet, and it's based/colocated with Texas A&M and the first "t" in TTI being Texas, so they are proud of their traffic engineering).

      Or, to state it a different way, there is nothing more useless than some twit on Slashdot (or anywhere else) stating "I've not actually studied this, but I couldn't solve the problem, so I assert no one else on the planet could either." It's never a humble "I don't know how this works at all. I would imagine there would be some issues with XXX, how do they get past that?" No, it's a "If I can't solve this problem, then everyone else in the world working together couldn't solve it either." Ego much?

      Simply, they rarely take down speed limit signs. Why? Because no one follows them. The police are notified. They are supposed to not be in that area. Yes, they specifically target areas for no enforcement. There are plenty of places with no enforcement at any given time, they just arrange for that to include the areas in question. Since people ignore the speed limits (at least up to 10 mph over), the study will be "close enough." And, when you repeat it endlessly, you will approach the "real" value. If the limit should be 55, then when the study is run at 45, it will indicate it is about 10 mph low, then run it again at 50 and it will show it's about 5 mph low. Then run at 55 will show it's right.

      Unfortunately, TX broke the rules when the politicians let the politicians set the limits at the number, rounded down, then subtracting 5. So if the test showed 54.9 was right, they could still set it at 45, when 60 would actually be safer than 45 in most cases.

      But then, that's how it's actually done, how they get valid results (and like most politicians, ignore them) and do so without major loss of life and without every racer in the area gathering there and running up and down the road.

    196. Re:Programmable Number Plates by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Its not the excessive speeding that politicians are worried about their genius, its the sudden stop when a reckless driver careens into a minivan full of kids and moms.

      You are either really young or very stupid.

      And you're an obnoxious ass, but I don't let that bother me.

      Not young. Not "get off my lawn" old, but certainly not young. Two kids, own my house...you figure it out.
      And as for stupid? No. 140+ IQ.

      If the politicians are concerned about the reckless driver careening into said minivan, I have one question for them:

      Why is your driver testing so crappy that said moron managed to get a driver's licence?

      Consider this scenario:

      Take away any single traffic law...
        -Wait for traffic to clear before turning left.
        -Stop for red lights.
        -Drive on the right side of the road.

      Doesn't matter which one. Just take one away, and assume that all other laws are followed perfectly.
      Then picture what our roads will be like without that single law.

      People turning left across traffic? Chaos, accidents, death.

      People not stopping for red lights? Chaos, accidents, death.

      People driving wherever they want on the road? Chaos, accidents, death.

      Now....take away speed limits. Again, assume that all other laws are followed to a T.

      What happens?

      Well.....nothing. Everybody gets where they're going faster, is all.

      There are only two things speed can actually do related to accidents.

      1. Make an accident worse that was going to happen anyway.
      2. Be a catalyst to an accident, due to not having time to react to avoid someone doing something stupid.

      Either way, something else has to happen in order for speed to be related to an accident.

      So, we can lower speeds, and eliminate some accidents, and lessen the severity of some more, but still leave some exactly as they were.
      Or, we can eliminate the other stupid driving problems, and eliminate _all_ accidents completely.

      Why the hell are we going after speed limits so hard?

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    197. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. I'm a bit farther north and we don't appear to have any roads like that. Consider me jealous. I consider it a nook in that it's a chunk of the area that I haven't driven much in. I never meant nook as in hick town.

    198. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Myopic · · Score: 1

      In a legal sense in the USA, okay I concede. In a general sense under common use, treason applies. My dictionary calls it "the crime of betraying one's country", and I think that fits the given description.

    199. Re:Programmable Number Plates by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Excellent post Stewbacca! I also lived in Germany for six years, and wholeheartedly agree that the biggest impediment to increasing our speeds is the lack of decent drivers ed in the U.S...not withstanding municipalities using limits for added revenue. Back in the 80's, I was told that it cost a German roughly the equivalent of $1500 before they could drive. Germans keep to the right, and pass only on the left. When someone is coming up behind, they get their asses over to the right, and they use those funny blinking lights that are just decorations for most American vehicles. I'll differ on one minor point. I think there are plenty of U.S. highways that could easily handle similar high speeds...mostly outside urban areas.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    200. Re:Programmable Number Plates by thrawn_aj · · Score: 1
      Goddammit, all I'm asking for is a link so I can follow up on this because I'm curious. Way to get your hackles up and rant like a loon.

      Or, to state it a different way, there is nothing more useless than some twit on Slashdot (or anywhere else) stating "I've not actually studied this, but I couldn't solve the problem, so I assert no one else on the planet could either."

      Your reading comprehension sucks balls. Your presumptuousness is no better.

      It's never a humble "I don't know how this works at all. I would imagine there would be some issues with XXX, how do they get past that?" No, it's a "If I can't solve this problem, then everyone else in the world working together couldn't solve it either."

      I thought that's what I was doing (in the first part at least). Here it is again - ["Ah. Please tell me where and when or at least point me to a source. I'm really curious to see some case studies on this (what really happened, etc.)"] How big a stick do you need to have up your ass to interpret this as you did? Of course, it's likely I didn't receive the memo on what constitutes "humble". Do you require that applicants call you "master"? Because I draw the line at that.

      In the latter part - ["So, my point is that it will either be dangerous or rather useless. The appearance of a scientifically set limit while being nothing of the kind"], I pointed out a possible flaw in the way I thought it would be done (which, since no one ever cares to post their fucking sources/links to more info, I have to base on what's posted ON HERE, don't I?). To be fair, I did overreach myself when I said "will" (bolded above). Based on the process AS DESCRIBED (by you and other people in this thread), I think it's a valid criticism. If that's not the full story, well post a fucking link or at least quote a source or SOMETHING to go on. I asked politely the first time. I see no reason to reward a barbaric reply with more politeness.

      Ego much?

      Bite me :p. You're the one who wants us to accept arguments that (at first glance) appear to be based on nothing but anecdotal evidence until someone asks for more information, at which point you come out with some moronic rant instead of addressing the question. Stay classy.

    201. Re:Programmable Number Plates by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Funny thing about people going around corners too fast is that they do not stay on the road. Would you also teach your kids not to sleep in their beds for fear of a truck driving through it?

    202. Re:Programmable Number Plates by WNight · · Score: 1

      So you'd be fine with me stealing from you as long as I did charitable works with some of the money?

      Simply because theft is easier doesn't make it right.

    203. Re:Programmable Number Plates by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      If you took from me ... No.

      If a duly elected democratic government used it's taxing authority ... I and the rest of the civilized world accept that every day not only without protest, but gladly.

      Spare me the libertarian blah blah how large does a mob have to be for theft to be justifiable. If you don't want to pay taxes to an entity with a monopoly on the use of force move to Somalia.

    204. Re:Programmable Number Plates by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Ok...I'll give you that. I'm pretty sure all county roads in both Lambton and Middlesex are 90. Provincial highways in both counties are still 80.

      I'm pretty sure I've seen other 90 limit county roads in the area, outside these two counties, but I can't remember where.

      I grew up about 5 miles south of that first one just outside of Inwood, though, so I know the area, speed limits, and, most importantly, speed traps pretty well. :)

      And now I live in London, so I'm pretty well acquainted with both counties.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    205. Re:Programmable Number Plates by WNight · · Score: 1

      Spare me the "move to Somalia" nonsense. You're as tiresome when you use the "love it or leave it" angle as the stereotypical smelly redneck in a wife-beater.

      While I'm glad (proud?) to see the things my labors can contribute to (accessible public health) I'm sickened by the unreasonable and unnecessary wars they're also funding.

      But you're the one who had to get bent out of shape about my opinion. Claiming taxes aren't theft, first offering some crazy rationale and then changing your argument to "but not when governments do it".

      The problem with taxes being theft is that California doesn't have much income when their victims' pockets dry up. It's not sustainable. Like how Rome needed to keep conquering to stay afloat. Health-care costs almost as much in a recession but the taxes, being a percentage of earnings, are lower.

      If the state used its mineral wealth instead of giving it away to the first corporation to claim it we could potentially be totally supported by value-creating (if resource-based) industry instead of coercive taxation. (And we'd be better stewards of our resources!)

      But I bet you aren't going to eat that libertarian label you were throwing around, are you?

    206. Re:Programmable Number Plates by jhoegl · · Score: 1

      No, speed limits are in effect because the human factor yields an inevitability... someone somewhere will do something wrong.

      If you really think that you are the best driver in the world, then I cant wait for you to get blindsided. Its not about you, its about others.

      Basically your argument is "well if everyone did as I did, there would never be a problem". You are right, I have had this discussion... with my parents... when I was 10.

      The reason for speedlimits is so that when someone does do something wrong, the survival rate is exponentialy increased based on the lower speed.

      Get off your high horse you do not know all the facts, just your perceptions.

    207. Re:Programmable Number Plates by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      You're really good at putting words in people's mouths, then accusing them of being immature based on those words.

      Never once did I say everyone has to drive as I do. Never once did I say I was the best driver in the world.

      The direction my comment was going, which you completely misread, is that we've got way more morons on the road than good drivers, because driver testing sucks. Were we to get rid of the worst 90% of drivers, would mistakes still happen? Sure. But the type of mistake that a good driver makes is totally different than a crappy driver makes.

      When a good driver realizes they're at the intersection they want to turn left at, but they're in the right hand lane, they modify their plan on the fly to drive past the intersection, and either turn around, or go around the block.

      When a crappy driver realizes they're at the intersection they want to turn left at, but they're in the right hand lane, they do one of several things:
      - blast across multiple lanes of traffic without looking.
      - stop, with their left turn signal on, completely blocking traffic until someone lets them into the next lane...repeated for each lane.
      - turn left from one of the straight through lanes.

      I've seen all of these, and every time I think the driver should be banned for life. Not because they made the initial mistake, but rather how they were incapable of reacting to it in a safe way.

      The problem is, no driver testing checks for things like this. All instructions are given explicitly:
      "Turn left here.....change lanes here....parallel park here."
      You don't have to think to pass a driver's test. You just have to be able to physically perform the maneuvers. In other words, a shell script could do it. You're basically a robot reacting to button presses.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    208. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Yeah, people having to sell or lose their houses because they couldn't afford their own property taxes. You know Prop 13 didn't just arise out of a vacuum, right?

      The underlying cause of the problems is the sacred parts of the budget. Period. End of effing story. Anything else is ideology and bullcrap.

      But just keep hammering and raping the taxpayer. I'm sure a different result will occur some day. Doesn't matter. 2012 is coming to upend the state into the sea. ;-)

    209. Re:Programmable Number Plates by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, people having to sell or lose their houses because they couldn't afford their own property taxes. You know Prop 13 didn't just arise out of a vacuum, right?

      So? It's the same way in just about everywhere else in the US (I don't know anywhere else that does it off purchase price, but they may be some). People got pissed when there was a value boom. It happens. Then they passed a stupid law tying the tax to the purchase price. And even worse, they continue to defend it. You'd think a liberal pro-tax state like California is made out to be would figure out that they should take the tax back to what it was before. And I don't know about there, but some places have talked about removing the waiver of tax on churches, because so many churches land-bank massive tracts and the removal of that one exception would balance the budget. I know why they did it. The land was increasing in value, and the rich wanted to keep the taxes on their Beverly Hills mansions low, and paraded some old people in front of the camera.

      The underlying cause of the problems is the sacred parts of the budget. Period. End of effing story. Anything else is ideology and bullcrap.

      The underlying cause is that the state doesn't collect as much as they spend. They can have as many sacred parts as they want, as long as they are funded.

      But just keep hammering and raping the taxpayer. I'm sure a different result will occur some day.

      What, people bitch about taxes and pay them anyway. What a surprise. People want to live in CA. They pay for that privilege. Though I hear stories of companies moving away, I don't see anything that indicates the loss is that big (unemployment isn't unusually high in CA, and the population is still increasing). If you have a problem with it, move. There are 50 more states, commonwealths, or districts within the US that have lower taxes (at least according to the poster who says CA has the highest taxes).

    210. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Splab · · Score: 1

      So you are basically saying the same as I did, the fact that roads are built to code with margin for idiots.

    211. Re:Programmable Number Plates by Splab · · Score: 1

      Thats all fine and dandy, but since then people have started using mobile phones, DVD players and other doowhackeys - on top of that your reaction time has not improved in any ways - it will still take you the same amount of time to realize something is wrong and react to it.

      Even with better everything physics are still the absolute law and bringing a car to a total standstill from 60 rather than 50 km/h still takes a shitload more distance.

    212. Re:Programmable Number Plates by jhoegl · · Score: 1

      No, I summed up your argument based on your writings. I didnt "put words in your mouth", as you say.
      And yes, this argument is better. They need to be trained how to think out a scenario instead of being a jackass. But here is the scoop... some people just dont care about being a jackass.
      And if your solution is to ban them from driving, well public transportation will be busy.

    213. Re:Programmable Number Plates by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      And if your solution is to ban them from driving, well public transportation will be busy.

      You say that like it's a bad thing....

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  3. The cycle by mrsteveman1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Spend too much money -> need money -> get more money with stupid schemes -> spend too much money -> ....

    Repeat

    1. Re:The cycle by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 3, Informative

      Exactly. California is ungovernable and run buy a bunch of tax and waste (it's a stretch to call it tax and spend) idiots. We lived there for 20+ years and got out 5 years ago due to the financial insanity of trying to make ends meet. I can honestly say the only things I miss are some of the radio stations (which I now get on the net) and Disneyland. Everything else is rubbish as compared to the asking price of living and doing business there. California is becoming a place for the rich and the poor. The rich can afford it, and the state pays* for everything if you're poor. If you're middle class they bend you over and pound you in the ass. With sand.

      * with borrowed money

      --
      I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
    2. Re:The cycle by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Well I hate to be the one to say this but California is prevented from collecting sufficient tax receipts to administer any state government on a day by day basis because of the structural budgetary problems imposed by Proposition 13. If forcing people to watch cartoons while tailgating doesn't work then maybe California should start shutting off traffic lights during off-peak hours to save electricity.

    3. Re:The cycle by zmollusc · · Score: 1

      They could shut off traffic lights completely and save everyone the time spent waiting at them, also the electricity and maintenance costs.

      --
      They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    4. Re:The cycle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the whole point. Politicians derive their ever-lasting power by getting rid of the middle class, because that class is a threat to their power. But it's not sustainable. The French Revolution, and Russian Communism occurred because the poor had nothing else to lose. Soon, Mexico will undergo a revolution too. Perhaps one with a Communist leader.

      I'm not sure what will happen with California. But if we aren't careful, our Union might dissolve in whole or in part. The financial stress is starting to become too overbearing.

    5. Re:The cycle by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      Actually, at night time, cities could easily turn a lot of lights into a flashing red.

    6. Re:The cycle by mlts · · Score: 1

      The problem is that -most- revolutions trade one nasty boss for another that perhaps is more bloodthirsty. Iran comes to mind when the people dumped the Shah, then found themselves at the barrel of the gun held by bloodthirsty fanatics.

      The only two exceptions in most of history where a revolution mattered for the average Joe would be the US revolution and the French revolution. Every other revolution in essence just changed one slavemaster for another.

    7. Re:The cycle by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      because the poor had nothing else to lose

      The difference now is that the poor are heavily subsidized poor. This is a much more effective means of control: pay people not enough to live and then give them subsidies if they qualify. Fight the power and you lose your subsidies. Result: sheeple.

      --
      I come here for the love
    8. Re:The cycle by coaxial · · Score: 2, Informative

      Exactly. California is ungovernable and run buy a bunch of tax and waste (it's a stretch to call it tax and spend) idiots.

      Well actually it's spend and don't tax. In that sense, it's a model Republican state.

      Lest we forget Prop 13 that essentially froze property tax income at 1970s values, it's constitution that makes initiatives sacrosanct, the constitutional amendment that requires a 2/3s supermajority to raise (but not lower) taxes, and a 2/3s supermajority to balance a budget, and a marginalized set of political extremists that just happen to hold 2 seats over the 1/3 minority in both houses. (Yes, slashdoters, 2 people hold the entire state hostage.)

      God I wished Repair California actually had their act together.

      Fuck the initiative process. Fuck the 2/3s supermajorites. Grow the fuck up.

      The refrain that taxes are "too high" has no basis on reality. Taxes are at a 50 year low nationwide, and taxes haven't been able to be raised in California for since the 1970s. Nationwide, the US is significantly below the OECD average at 28%. (The OECD average 36%.)

      If I was King of California, I'd know what I'd do solve the budget problems of California. I'd raise taxes.

    9. Re:The cycle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Prop 13 is not the problem. They'd just be wasting even more money while retirees are taxed out of their homes.

    10. Re:The cycle by Undead+Waffle · · Score: 2, Informative

      If I was King of California, I'd know what I'd do solve the budget problems of California. I'd raise taxes.

      Except California already has the highest sales tax (when local taxes are added). Not to mention one of the highest costs of living in the country. I would say that's a pretty good indication that our problem is related more to our spending than our taxing.

      Driving up the cost of living and the cost of doing business can cause plenty of negative side effects, so just raising taxes isn't a fix-all for California's budget problems.

      taxes haven't been able to be raised in California for since the 1970s

      That's just outright wrong. For the past year we've been paying an extra 1% sales tax and local taxes have certainly gone up. LA county went up half a percent at the same time.

      And if you're talking about property taxes not going up the value of the property is still assessed when the property changes ownership. Even if the percentage of the property value paid doesn't change it's still a lot more for the state government than it was in the 70s since home prices have gone up quite a bit faster than inflation.

    11. Re:The cycle by WNight · · Score: 1

      It was interesting talking to Iranians at protests for their recent stolen election. The majority of people were flying to current islamic flag and merely wanted the religious government (the Ayatollah) to let their religious puppet lead instead of the other religious puppet. Very disappointing.

      A few people flew the old flag and wanted to pitch the entire religious government, seeing that it was the Ayatollah who fixed the election. But they just wanted to bring the old government back. (Dunno if they wanted the Shah or what parts.) At least they realized it was theirs to control - the first group didn't.

      One thing I didn't see was supporters of the coup government. They seem to have kept a pretty low profile overseas. There was fear about them collecting names and hurting the protestors or their families at home though. Even as they expressed their gratitude at foreign attention they worried about the photos being used against them back home.

      If they are collecting information of protestors maybe it's shaping up to be a Rwanda in a few years. They've got a polarized population that can obviously (from incidents during the post-election) be ideologically motivated to group-based slaughter.

      It's a shame. We put all this war effort into Afghanistan (Canada does) and we can't even afford one sniper team or airstrike to kill the Ayatollah. If everyone acted to stop these hitlers they wouldn't be a problem. Instead we let them legitimize themselves by collecting enough slaves.

    12. Re:The cycle by Third+Position · · Score: 1, Insightful

      California is becoming a place for the rich and the poor. The rich can afford it, and the state pays* for everything if you're poor. If you're middle class they bend you over and pound you in the ass. With sand.

      * with borrowed money

      Well, isn't that liberalism in a nut-shell? The rich and the poor teaming up to stick it to the middle class? I'd expect no less from any reliably Democratic voting state.

      --
      American Third Position
      Finally, a real choice!
    13. Re:The cycle by Macrat · · Score: 1

      and the state pays* for everything if you're poor.

      Gotta keep the slaves healthy. If they are all sick, who will clean the toilets and mow the lawns?

    14. Re:The cycle by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I'm genuinely curious as to how on Earth CA can waste that kind of money. In my part of WA, the sales tax hits a state high with 9.5% on most items, and a whopping 10% on things like restaurant food. And we're going to be getting taxed on things like water, soda and similar in the near future. But we don't have an income tax, and even in this economy the tax hikes have been pretty minimal. The cuts have been significant, but we weren't going way overboard on spending like the essentially free schooling for higher education that was available in CA at the community colleges either.

    15. Re:The cycle by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      Yes that's the typical canard they use to rationalize everyone paying property taxes in seventies dollars except you, when you move in and become almost the entire tax base for all the "old ladies" on the entire street.

    16. Re:The cycle by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      ... we can't even afford one sniper team or airstrike to kill the Ayatollah.

      You said it best yourself - "At least they realized it was theirs to control ..."

      We have no business taking out foreign leaders because we disagree with their methods. Bay of Pigs, anyone?

      We should be educating their people as best we can to realize that they _can_ be the masters of their own fate, not making that choice for them. The best example of the people choosing to shed their master's yoke is when the Berlin Wall fell in the 90's. We need more success stories like that and fewer "we know what's best for you" invasions and CIA-led coups.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    17. Re:The cycle by mlts · · Score: 1

      The Ayatollah is just one person. If he gets killed, there are a lot of clerics who would take his place and who would be *far* more anti-West than what is there now. Same if Ahmadinejad bites it. Assassinating a cleric will only make things a lot worse than it is now. It would give the government a legitimate enemy, and rally people behind them, further enhancing their grip on power. The best thing the West can do is not give any justification to the extremists for their actions. This way moderates can eventually come to power who are more interested in turning Iran into a top world economic powerhouse than continuing to exist on anti-US propaganda.

    18. Re:The cycle by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We have no business taking out foreign leaders because we disagree with their methods. Bay of Pigs, anyone?

      It's preferable to carpet-bombing of countries. I do see that this is a false dichotomy. We created this problem in the first place.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:The cycle by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      It's preferable to carpet-bombing of countries.

      And I see leaving other countries alone unless they attack us as preferable to meddling in the affairs of other countries. I'm as right-wing as they come, but forcing our will on others by any use of force makes us as bad as any tin-pot dictator, IMHO.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    20. Re:The cycle by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      To an extent, you're unfortunately right. However, liberals tend to try to target their tax increases to the upper class, there is inevitably some spillover onto the middle class.

      Conservatives, OTOH, are the rich and the middle class teaming up to stick it to the poor, and there is inevitably some spillover onto the middle class.

    21. Re:The cycle by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      Right. No houses have been sold since the 1970's. We're all still paying $200 a year.

      Property taxes are not frozen in any way shape or form. They have an increase rate that is capped regardless of housing price bubbles, and if your house is sold, or has major improvements and is reassessed, it is then taxed at its new value. The only people arguably "making out" in this scenario are people who bought decades ago in areas where prices were a fraction of what they are today. Who tend to be, you know, old and retired and on fixed incomes.

      In the first 8 years I owned my house, it's value went up 2.5X. Now it's back down to 2X. You honestly believe my property tax bill should have followed that curve, in spite of my income remaining fairly flat over that time and my not selling the property and realizing any of that value increase? My property taxes have in fact increased by about 38% in that time.

    22. Re:The cycle by coaxial · · Score: 1

      Except California already has the highest sales tax (when local taxes are added). Not to mention one of the highest costs of living in the country. I would say that's a pretty good indication that our problem is related more to our spending than our taxing.

      Well that's more of an artifact that property taxes revenues are stagnant and income taxes have remained low as well. A tweak of either one of these could finance a reduction in the regressive sales tax. Sales taxes are the easiest to get through the legislature, so of course they're going to be the most frequent target during crises.

      The main reasons why the cost of living is so high in California is due to property values, and property values remain high because people still want to move to California. Yes, California has had a net loss of 200k of migration, but it is still in the top 10 of all attracting states in the country.

    23. Re:The cycle by coaxial · · Score: 1

      Well it's the initiative process. We have initiatives that lock the budget down, and can't be modified without another initiative. (No other state has the combination of budget, tax, and initiative laws that California does. That's what makes it ungovernable.) One of the largest pieces of the budget is the horribly overcrowded prison system. We spend more on prisons than we do on higher education. Why? Three strikes. We've locked our budget so that any increase in spending in one area, requires an proportional increase in school funding. Raised some money for roads? Well the schools get half of that.

      It's absurd. I'd eliminate the initiative process.

    24. Re:The cycle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spend too much money ....

      $50 for me -- $10 for the room.

    25. Re:The cycle by WNight · · Score: 1

      Pft. Do nothing and it'll sort itself out. Slaver apologist.

      If you ever see a religious dictatorship in my country that denies me self-government, please SHOOT THEM. And I have to assume that other people feel the same way. Not that they want their current leader dead, or that they want to swap for a foreign slaver, but that there's a spot they'd gladly welcome help.

      I also have to assume that spot was reached in Iran, where government-backed militia members beat and killed thousands to restore "order". If you see me being beaten or killed, please help me. If the aggressors claim to be my government you're safe to assume they don't have my consent to govern.

      The Ayatollah is just one person. If he gets killed, there are a lot of clerics who would take his place

      Sure. Maybe we'd have to assassinate twenty clerics before they stopped killing protestors after holding rigged elections... Can't be as bad as full-out war where we kill hundreds of thousands of draftees before leaving the leader in power to re-offend.

      And at least during that time the dictators aren't consolidating power, having moderates jailed and killed, murdering rape victims, etc.

      [clerics] who would be *far* more anti-West than what is there now.

      I'm not concerned with empire building but with dictator squashing and people freeing. With the people not enslaved into following the mad cleric's demands they're just another ranting nutjob.

      You can call that "West" if you want, but that's just because you're lumping the entire middle-east together in a racist fashion and assigning them simplistic motives and the inability to differentiate between a USA-style invasion of Iraq and a targeted removal of dictators.

      If we'd done it in Germany early enough it would have worked. Hitler wasn't the only force behind the Nazi atrocities but having the war brought directly to the people making the decisions would have erased their god-complex pretty quickly. It might have even accelerated WW2 by giving Germany an excuse (that it proved to be perfectly capable of coming up with on its own), but it wouldn't have made it worse - giving the bully time to prepare is always worse.

    26. Re:The cycle by WNight · · Score: 1

      Forcing it, yes. But the people have a valid right to ask for our help in removing him.

      Had we been willing to consider it, as opposed to your total hands-off policy, he might have been less cavalier with his treatment of the slaves (oops, citizens) he had killed by the militia. Instead he know we'll never touch him and he's free to murder critics right and left.

      I'd agree with leaving peaceful and happy groups alone, but when a dictator starts oppressing the people it's not government - it's slavery. It's like leaving children with an abuser because they're his.

    27. Re:The cycle by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      I think we're in violent agreement. If the people want change and can't accomplish it through non-violent means, then maybe we could intervene by applying pressure. Until then, we shouldn't mess around with them.

      Here are a few litmus tests for you:

      Cuba: Suppression: medium. Populace's opinion: Love Castro. Intervene: no.
      North Korea: Suppression: heavy. Populace's opinion: brainwashed, can't make an informed decision. Intervene: maybe
      China: Suppression: was medium, trending low. Populace's opinion: some like it, some hate it. Intervene: no

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    28. Re:The cycle by WNight · · Score: 1

      Here's my list.

      World: Intervene, YES!

      We should roll white UN trucks through the streets of every city in the world and offer to relocate anyone (man, woman, child, criminal, debtor, etc) to a new life. And we should do it in a "proactive peacekeeping" style. Everything Canada (could have been and tried to be but) wasn't in Rwanda.

      But, besides that semi-hippy answer...

      NKorea: Intervene - SKorea is on the line and negotiating with terror always fails - see Hitler and ... North Korea.
      China: Too big - we can't fight openly. Intervene by bypassing their state-controlled media controls and let a liberal educated populace peace them up from the inside.

      If the people want change and can't accomplish it through non-violent means, then maybe we could intervene by applying pressure. Until then, we shouldn't mess around with them.

      Right. I don't think we should shoot the Ayatollah for being the leader of a country with a questionable election.

      I think we should be willing to shoot dictators like the murder-ordering mob-bosses they are. And we should let that be known as a general principle. He'd probably take the hint and not condone/order the murder of protestors as he did, or forbid recounts, etc. And if not we'd be ready when the people needed us.

      Of course the other part of this strategy is not being imperialists so that people welcome us as liberators instead of fear to call us.

    29. Re:The cycle by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      And you wonder why the rest of the world hates the US for our attitude with regard to bullying other countries and pushing our brand of freedom on them.

      We must either respect their sovereignty, or pay the consequences. What would you say if China decided to 'enlighten' our population by "...roll[ing] RED Chinese trucks through the streets of every city in the world and "offer" to relocate anyone..."?

      Your comments re: China are spot on, BTW. No invasion necessary - we are well on the way to reforming their government by showing their people how good things can be, not by force.

      I want everyone in the world to be able to enjoy the (quickly eroding) freedoms we in the US enjoy, but I'm not willing to invade/overthrow governments to do it. If you, as a country, have exhausted all peaceful means, then maybe we can help. If your government is horribly repressive, we'll take you in as a refugee. But invading to force peace and freedom is a bit of a contradiction, IMHO.

      "I think we should be willing to shoot dictators like the murder-ordering mob-bosses they are. And we should let that be known as a general principle. "

      Using or threatening to use force to bring about political change is the definition of terrorism, you know.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  4. This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is crazy. How long until advertising is allowed on my forehead? It is irksome enough having most of my belongings plastered with unsightly brands; now companies I have nothing to do with can advertise on my car. I will try to cover whatever part displays the ads with electrical tape.

    1. Re:This... by Larry+Lightbulb · · Score: 1

      If you want to allow advertising on your forehead, there's possibly someone who will buy the space. The problem comes when someone wants to put advertising there without your consent.

    2. Re:This... by madfilipino · · Score: 1

      From a different point of view, this could be the "great equalizer". Voted for Prop 8? Pro-gay marriage ads on your plate! Atheist? Jesus ads! Sex predator? "I'm a sex predator" ad 24/7! The possibilities are endless!

    3. Re:This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even scarier: The GOVERNMENT forcing you to have ads on your forehead.

  5. Cool idea, destined to turn out badly by Monty845 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The idea is cool, but I would be really pissed if someone could put ads on my car without my consent. But how else will they rake in the money for the state? (Maybe make it optional and split the ad revenue with the driver?)

    1. Re:Cool idea, destined to turn out badly by an00bis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The idea is definitely not cool. But technically the plate belongs to the state so I guess they could do whatever they wanted with it. It's going to eventually come down to someone taking offense to what could potentially be placed on their car. I really don't see this ever happening.

    2. Re:Cool idea, destined to turn out badly by jhoegl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wait till they GPS the shit. Oh your in zip code #####, advertise this.
      Privacy people will go nuts.

    3. Re:Cool idea, destined to turn out badly by blai · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What if, somehow, the licence plate will pay for your car insurance?

      --
      In soviet Russia, God creates you!
    4. Re:Cool idea, destined to turn out badly by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 1

      But how else will they rake in the money for the state?

      Stop spending money on gimmicks that will cost more than they pull in until they 'naturally' recover?

    5. Re:Cool idea, destined to turn out badly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, it'll be optional. By buying a vanity plate at extra cost, you can set yourself apart from the average shmoes on the road with Ad-Free Plates(tm)!

    6. Re:Cool idea, destined to turn out badly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doubt it.

    7. Re:Cool idea, destined to turn out badly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck is wrong with you that you think this idea is cool? Are you a legislator? That's the only explanation for how fucking stupid you'd have to be to think this is a cool idea.

    8. Re:Cool idea, destined to turn out badly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry. Idea is dumb. OK lets add $$$ to the cost of the car because we need wiring to power the plate plus a way of reading the speed of the vehicle - while we are about it lets save on speed radar things, just put the speed on the number plate!! OK not you can drive around displaying a load of trashy ads etc while being given the responsibility to keep someone elses equipment in good working order. The fine for having a malfunctioning number plate will have to be bigger than the cost of you getting it fixed in order to make you do it. This is about as stupid as the "road safety" campaign where I live where they have billboards and ads on buses saying how dangerous it is to be distracted while driving.

    9. Re:Cool idea, destined to turn out badly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The idea is cool

      If you could only see my face when I read this article, you would realized exactly how NOT COOL this idea is.

    10. Re:Cool idea, destined to turn out badly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How else is the Governors' friends' cousins' husband supposed to assist in the pilfering of government money? That's how it works - get the govt spending on what it shouldn't )or *how* it shouldn't at the least) and rake in your share of public money.

    11. Re:Cool idea, destined to turn out badly by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      FTA: "The move is intended as a moneymaker for a state facing a $19 billion deficit. "

      You didn't think *you'd* get the money, did you?

      --
      No sig today...
    12. Re:Cool idea, destined to turn out badly by somersault · · Score: 1

      I'd at least want them to reimburse me for the extra fuel my vehicle is going to use through added weight for the plate/wiring, and electricity drain on the battery..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    13. Re:Cool idea, destined to turn out badly by dlt074 · · Score: 1

      who cares if they rake in MORE money. they need to learn to live within their means and stop coming up with ways to take more of my money.

    14. Re:Cool idea, destined to turn out badly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if, somehow, I could shit diamonds?

    15. Re:Cool idea, destined to turn out badly by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      Whatever income the state derives from this plan, will be used up by expanding government. It doesn't matter how much money they take in, they will always find a way to spend that much plus a whole bunch more. Taxes aren't a zero sum game. Politions can always find some useless thing to spend your money on, like $15,000 for a picture of a plastic Jesus statue in a bottle of urine.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    16. Re:Cool idea, destined to turn out badly by nCnt++ · · Score: 1

      How about dividing up the "Hollywood" sign into a million 1'x1' sections that can be sold as advertisements? 10 bucks a square per month. Google "million dollar home page" for insight.

      --
      Have you ever noticed the best /. comments are long and the best Chuck Norris jokes are short?
  6. Lollerskates were stolen off the roflcopter, sir. by Acecoolco · · Score: 0, Troll

    Ahahaha, you stop your car if you dont want anyone running your plates? very nice!

    --
    Just because it works, Doesn't make it right. - JTM
  7. California, land of bad ideas by Paintballparrot · · Score: 1

    The article doesn't say what kids of screens would be used but I'm assuming some kind of LCD. So now every time my car gets a little tap in a parking lot I have to replace it. These also seem like a prime target for jackasses to vandalize, just a little kick and you have to get a new one. I don't think they would like power washers very much either. Whats wrong with stamped and plated metal do you really need more information than a registration number? It would be a better idea to put ads on the signs they use to warn people of accidents and traffic jams when they aren't in use.

    1. Re:California, land of bad ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      really, your license plate receives that many significant impacts on a frequent basis? try another made-up argument simpleton

    2. Re:California, land of bad ideas by William+Robinson · · Score: 1

      The article doesn't say what kids of screens would be used but I'm assuming some kind of LCD.

      Few days back I was looking at paper like display called E-Ink that could display contents in b/w. The coolest feature was, the image was there even when the power was cut off, making it less hungry for power. The images looked cool and I could fold the display like a paper as well.

      I suppose, these kind of displays might work in these kind of applications.

    3. Re:California, land of bad ideas by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      what you are describing is the exact tech used in kindle. when you turn it off, the screen doesn't get empty, it just shows the face of some random dude. and battery power is consumed only when refreshing the screen, not for refreshing it.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    4. Re:California, land of bad ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and battery power is consumed only when refreshing the screen, not for refreshing it
      lolwut?

    5. Re:California, land of bad ideas by Pikoro · · Score: 1

      Danger will robinson! Good ideas are not allowed in government.

      --
      "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
    6. Re:California, land of bad ideas by gruber_aekdb · · Score: 0

      Along with the screen, there was no comment about the power supply. The site said they could send out Amber Alerts to the plates, so I'm assuming there will be some kind of radio (though I suppose that'd almost be a given to update the ads), there will have to be some kind of sensor to record when the car is in motion v stopped, and some means of changing the display (possibly displaying the image constantly, unless the e-ink/kindle idea discussed below is used)... All of that will probably require a fair amount of juice. Will the new plates plug into my car's battery? Or will it run off of 4 AAA batteries? Who would be responsible for changing the batteries? I'd argue the state, since they're the ones collecting the spoils from it, but they would probably require the driver to do so... Could a cop pull me over if the battery happens to die while I'm out & about and all I have is a blank screen? Other questions/issues that come to mind... If were to leave California, and stop at a traffic light or whatever and a cop pulls up behind me, and instead of seeing a bunch of alphanumeric characters, he sees ad ad for Viagra... I doubt the officer would be too fond of it and would probably ask me to pull over... That could get annoying after awhile. Going on with that - if I leave the state (assuming the data is only sent in the state), or into an area with poor reception (San Francsico on AT&T's network for example), I could be broadcasting an Amber Alert that I picked up as I was exiting the whole way from San Diego to Prince Edwards Island in Canada... That could possibly cause some issues... If the plate can tell when it is not in motion, it logically can then also tell when it is in motion. I doubt it would be too hard to have it keep track of the speed it was traveling as well. Tie that in with a GPS chip so the plate can figure out exactly where the car is & what the speed limit is... If they're selling ads to raise extra money, I could see the plate flashing "I'm speeding pull me over!" once it reaches a certain speed - after all more traffic tickets == more revenue... And there could be 4th amendment/privacy issues to if it logs the speed you travel. What if there is an ad I object to due to moral/religious/etc grounds? Will there be a way that I can opt out of certain ads? I could see all kinds of political people buying up ad space on the plates - what if I don't support a particular candidate for congress but s/he bought a plate ad? Or if both the republican & democratic candidates for position X bought plate ads, could I specify which I am so just my candidate gets time on my car? Any way to import my own ads? For example, I may want to advertise my organization's bake sale, but we don't have the million or so the state wants to run ads (nor would we want it broadcasting state wide)

    7. Re:California, land of bad ideas by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Since my last front license plate was curved like a bowl, I'd say that yea, license plates get dinged up.

      What are rocks, water, snow, salt, sand heat and cold going to do to these things?

  8. No way. by TavisJohn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No way would I plug that stupidity into my cars power supply.

    Want to advertise on MY property, then pay ME not the state.

    I wonder how long after this goes into effect that some guy files a lawsuit for embarrassing him by displaying a tampon advert on his truck's plate.

    Or some religious crazy files a lawsuit because the plate displayed a condom advert...

    1. Re:No way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh just think, using your electricity generated from the gasoline you paid for, and you get no profit sharing. Oh the lawsuits will go crazy

    2. Re:No way. by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      Want to advertise on MY property, then pay ME not the state.

      Those plates aren't your property.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    3. Re:No way. by J.J.+Dane · · Score: 1

      The battery that powers it is,though, unless licens plates would come with "batteries included"

    4. Re:No way. by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, they'll be solar powered...

    5. Re:No way. by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      That might work in California, but good luck if you drive to Oregon, Washington, or a bunch of other sunless states.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    6. Re:No way. by TavisJohn · · Score: 1

      But the CAR is. And so is the gas and electricity that is used to power the plates.

  9. Lower fees? by Dr_Banzai · · Score: 5, Funny

    Perhaps accepting the advertising could result in lower license or insurance fees.

    1. Re:Lower fees? by darth+dickinson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When has the government *ever* lowered fees?

    2. Re:Lower fees? by jhoegl · · Score: 1

      When did deflation ever occur to allow for lowered fees?
      Yeah... bitching about lowering fees when cost of living constantly increases is the dumbest argument an uneducated fool could ever conjure up...

    3. Re:Lower fees? by donaggie03 · · Score: 2

      Exactly. Just a few weeks ago we got a notice in the mail that the water rates are going to go up soon. Why? Because water usage is DOWN in my area.

      --
      Three days from now?? Thats tomorrow!! ~Peter Griffin
    4. Re:Lower fees? by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      When did deflation ever occur to allow for lowered fees?

      Actually, about two weeks ago the Queensland state government announced that it was reducing its annual vehicle registration fees by $24.00. The reduction, however, wasn't in a state government portion of the fees - it came from the renegotiated Compulsory Third Party insurance premiums. And it's more than offset by the rising fuel costs after they axed the state fuel subsidy last year. Go figure.

    5. Re:Lower fees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good news, everyone! Car registration is now free! ...of course your new GPS-WiFi-Cellular-LCD license plates now cost $499.99 plus installation. Don't forget to get 2!

    6. Re:Lower fees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what are prisoners going to do for work then?

    7. Re:Lower fees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're missing the point of the parent post - it would be used as a carrot to encourage voluntary takeup of this. Once enough people have been sold on the idea they can then make it mandatory a few year down the line. It's a classic tactic for stealthily introducing unpopular things. The government bribes you by offering lowered fees in return for increased power for themselves at a later date.

    8. Re:Lower fees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you from Colorado? They are pulling that here. A few years ago they had to raise rates because of a drought, and now that we are out of the drought nobody is using water because they are so used to conserving and the rain is more than enough, so they need to raise rates again.

    9. Re:Lower fees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps accepting the advertising could result in lower license or insurance fees.

      BA HA HA HA HA! You don't live in California, do you? :-)

      More likely the drivers will foot the extra cost. *We* will have to pay to carry around mini billboards, and the insurance will find some way to go up and blame this.

      This moron-run cesspit can't go bankrupt fast enough. Bring on the creditors already. Dissolve the legislature and start over.

    10. Re:Lower fees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, those Evony ads could cause MORE accidents. Though GTA adverts would be brilliant.

    11. Re:Lower fees? by sorak · · Score: 1

      During every presidential administration for the past 30 years...When Reagan took office, the top tax rate was at 90%. Obama suggested increasing the same bracket's rate from 36% to 39% and was accused of being a socialist.

    12. Re:Lower fees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Just a few weeks ago we got a notice in the mail that the water rates are going to go up soon. Why? Because water usage is DOWN in my area.

      We've known for years how supply-and-demand works.

      Now we're learning how demand-and-demand works.

    13. Re:Lower fees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When has the government *ever* lowered fees?

      A few years back,when Schwartzenbugger made his craven bid for votes by lowering auto license fees. It worked -- he got in.

      Now that the son of a bitch is on his way out, they're going up again

      We were taught in civics classes that an advantage of our system was that ill-performing pols could be tossed out at the next election, The lying bastard Schwartzenfucker couldn't wait that long, so he pushed for a hugely expensive off-cycle election so he could dash in and "save" the state from its budget crisis. Nice start, you cornholer.

      Then, after criticizing the practice of over-borrowing, he gave himself a final shot at doing exactly that, while getting a law passed making the same practice unavailable to any successors.

      Finally, he's leaving the state with an even bigger deficit which the scurrilous bastard is trying to sweep under the rug of "the recession", hoping his fan base will believe that line of fetid shit.

    14. Re:Lower fees? by jhoegl · · Score: 1

      So your point is the politicians made it "look" like you are paying less fees when you are really paying the same amount or more.
      Grats, I think you figured out how to get rid of all sales taxes.... o.O

  10. Backdoor Tracking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure they will all be updatable over cellular or wifi networks.

  11. Crashes? by the1337g33k · · Score: 3, Funny

    What if it gets the Blue Screen of Death?

    1. Re:Crashes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It means you're a bad driver.

    2. Re:Crashes? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 5, Funny

      What if it gets the Blue Screen of Death?

      Blue screens are almost always a driver problem.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    3. Re:Crashes? by hack++slash · · Score: 1

      That's actually a very valid point, registration plates don't lose their number if they get damaged in an accident - but an electronic one most likely would.

      Good luck identifying cars in a multiple crash pileup where there's fire involved...

      --
      To do something right, you often have to roll up your sleeves and get busy.
    4. Re:Crashes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You win the internetz. Good show!

  12. Forehead Advertising by Capsaicin · · Score: 1

    [I]s crazy. How long until advertising is allowed on my forehead?

    Great idea, you're a genius! Just hang on a moment, we'll get right back to you.

    --
    Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
    1. Re:Forehead Advertising by mavasplode · · Score: 1

      gotadspace.com will help you sell your forehead for advertising.

      --
      ACTUAL SIZE!!!
    2. Re:Forehead Advertising by meerling · · Score: 1

      Been done (look it up), and since YOU completely own that particular space, YOU can do whatever you want, more or less.

      On the other hand, your car and everything on it can be argued to be yours, but the state requires you display the license plate 'number' in a readable state, however, I don't believe there is anything that allows them to obscure that same license number or to display advertisement you didn't specifically allow on your property (car).
      It's obviously that I'm not a lawyer, but heck, even I can see some really big obvious flaws in this, not the least of which is totally pissing off the constituency.

    3. Re:Forehead Advertising by Capsaicin · · Score: 1

      help you sell your forehead for advertising

      Ah yes, but the point is to sell someone else's forehead for advertising! And to do that, we first have to buy the legislature.

      --
      Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
  13. Example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets use registration contact details to target specific ads! On Joe Smith's car, a 53 year old, Viagra ads will be displayed 75% of the time, and an ad for a golf ball the other 25%. On Sarah's car, a Ford, a 35 year old, tampons will be displayed 50% of the time, and the local clothing chain the other 50% of the time.

    1. Re:Example by deniable · · Score: 1

      How often do you look at your own license plate while driving?

    2. Re:Example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only once

    3. Re:Example by BluBrick · · Score: 1

      Won't work. I can't see the license plate on my own car while I am driving

      Here's one way that targeted advertising could work. Camera-bearing cellphones are cheap enough - include a little cellphone-type device in the license plate. Now you can take a photo of the car behind me, read its license and target the ad to that car's owner. The beauty of this system is that you can also use the cellphone to work out which billboard I am nearest and target me via the billboard.

      What's that? What are you saying? PRY-VASSI? I'm sorry, I'm afraid I don't know what you mean!

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    4. Re:Example by deniable · · Score: 1

      If you're going to use the billboards, use the ones that scan the IF stage of FM radios and determine which station most people are listening to and set the ads based on that.

  14. pulled over? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "I'm sorry officer. Guess you should've written my number down BEFORE you pulled me over!"

    1. Re:pulled over? by deniable · · Score: 4, Funny

      "No, I didn't get to choose the bacon ad."

    2. Re:pulled over? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The plate would display standard plate information when the car is moving, but would here comes the word you missed also oh there it went! display ads when the car is stopped for more than 4 seconds

    3. Re:pulled over? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "bad cop, no donut" Fresh donuts from Mama Johnnies

    4. Re:pulled over? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best pun ever

  15. I would opt in... by g-doo · · Score: 1

    if they waived the license registration and made it free, in light of the ad revenue the DMV or state would be receiving.

  16. Maybe the State of California should instead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... stick with the pot legalization vote in november and subsequent taxation to help their budget woes.

    1. Re:Maybe the State of California should instead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this boys and girls is how California got into its mess in the first place: The flower children of the 1960's are now running the state.

  17. The Legislature? by fm6 · · Score: 1, Informative

    the California state legislature wants

    I guess you were asleep when they showed that "how a bill becomes law" video. The California state legislature hasn't even voted on this, and I doubt that it ever will. Like it says in TFA, this is a proposal by a one particular member, and will never be more than that unless he gets a lot of other assemblymen and state senators to back it.

    1. Re:The Legislature? by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 2, Informative

      I guess you were asleep when they showed that "how a bill becomes law" video. The California state legislature hasn't even voted on this, and I doubt that it ever will. Like it says in TFA, this is a proposal by a one particular member, and will never be more than that unless he gets a lot of other assemblymen and state senators to back it.

      I guess you fell asleep before reading the sentence in TFA that says the bill "passed unanimously through the Senate last month"? The Senate is part of the Legislature, you know.

      --
      "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
    2. Re:The Legislature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      From TFA:

      The bill has received no formal opposition. It passed unanimously through the Senate last month and is scheduled to be heard Monday by the Assembly Transportation Committee.

      Learn to RTFA fully before you post.

    3. Re:The Legislature? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Well, even if it does pass, it doesn't mean that it's going to happen. It means that the DMV will study it and in a few years make a recommendation. The development costs are completely paid for by the companies wanting to provide the plates.

    4. Re:The Legislature? by fm6 · · Score: 1

      I confess to not having read TFA all the way to the end (where this tidbit appears). But though the senate may be part of the legislature, that's still not "what the legislature wants" (or "what california wants" as it says in the headline), especially when only 25 out of 40 senators were present for the vote.

  18. Re:Really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly, you've never had a car in SoCal.

  19. issues by AnAdventurer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If they can send (?) ad and other information (FTFA) to your plate, they can receive it as well. I am guessing; where you are, for how long, or for how fast you are going. Possibly privacy takes another icicle in the eye.

    --
    6.8SPC TR of 550, l xwind at 6, drift rt at 26" drops 77". AT has 503 ft-lbs at 1403 fps. FT 0.86
    1. Re:issues by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      If they can send (?) ad and other information (FTFA) to your plate, they can receive it as well.

      Considering that two-way communication is much more expensive to implement and maintain than a simple broadcast, why is this a given?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    2. Re:issues by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Not likely. They almost certainly will rig it so that it sends data when you pass a certain point, then each time it detects that you've stopped it goes through the spool of ads to display. It's a much less complicated way of doing it. Especially since they need the sensors anyways and memory in that quantity is dirt cheap at present.

    3. Re:issues by AnAdventurer · · Score: 1

      I think two-way comms are very likely. CA is nearly a police state as it is. There would already be a infrastructure setup to send ads, the plates will have power, memory and a small processor. All you need to get a position is something akin to a overpowered RFID. The ID already being known as the license plate number, placing pairs of receivers here and there. It would not be building much cost into the system and pretty short sighted not to consider it for the long term.

      --
      6.8SPC TR of 550, l xwind at 6, drift rt at 26" drops 77". AT has 503 ft-lbs at 1403 fps. FT 0.86
    4. Re:issues by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      I think two-way comms are very likely. CA is nearly a police state as it is.

      A bankrupt police state.

      All you need to get a position is something akin to a overpowered RFID.

      Hah. And a power source. And a line of communication. And a system that can sort through that data and do something useful with it. And the hardware install on the cars that transmits. And the extra people to maintain it. Etc.

      It would not be building much cost into the system and pretty short sighted not to consider it for the long term.

      Utterly impractical.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    5. Re:issues by AnAdventurer · · Score: 1

      Money and practicality (or lack there of) rarely gets in the way of government. Oregon has already played around with GPS transceivers in autos. Call me a doomist or anarchist but I think this kind of government encroachment on "non-fundamental" freedoms is a near certainty. I am not a libertarian or teabagger, I don't have the answers, sometimes more government regulation is needed, but not this. Anyway, I am just a hillbilly with too many guns, what do I know?

      --
      6.8SPC TR of 550, l xwind at 6, drift rt at 26" drops 77". AT has 503 ft-lbs at 1403 fps. FT 0.86
    6. Re:issues by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Call me a doomist or anarchist but I think this kind of government encroachment on "non-fundamental" freedoms is a near certainty

      Oh we totally see eye to eye here. Partly for 'evil' reasons and partly because this country's so stinkin huge that technology will undoubtedly be called in to make the basic every day runnings of the gov't easier. I only disagree with the bit about the two-way license plates. I'm actually kinda surprised that on-star isn't mandatory on all vehicles by now. Heh.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  20. Whoah by http · · Score: 1

    I was wondering how seriously to take this elected representative for a bit, until I came across this actuality:

    "The idea is not to turn a motorist's vehicle into a mobile billboard, but rather to create a platform for motorists to show their support for existing good working organizations," he said.

    Uh, what would a mobile billboard do differently, exactly?

    It appears IQs have dropped sharply while I was away. Politicians feel free to change their mind and policies in the span of one sentence, as if nobody is going to notice.

    --
    If opportunity came disguised as temptation, one knock would be enough.
    3^2 * 67^1 * 977^1
    1. Re:Whoah by gsslay · · Score: 1

      "The idea is not to turn a motorist's vehicle into a mobile billboard, but rather to create a platform for motorists to show their support for existing good working organizations," he said.

      If only there was some other platform for people to show their support for organisations that didn't involve their license plate. You'd think that someone could come up with a way of sticking some supporting text onto your vehicle. It could go on your bumper, or even be stuck to the inside of your back window. You could even stick it on a flag and stick it out your side window.

      Too bad someone hasn't thought of these obvious ideas. I think they'd really catch on, cos there really is no better way to project your personality and views.

    2. Re:Whoah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow!! Great IDEA! Have you filed for a patent for that yet?

    3. Re:Whoah by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      Or if you, say, added a small border around the plate with just enough room for some text . . .

  21. What about my batteries? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    This seems like it would be an added drain on the car battery, especially if the system wasn't smart enough to tell the difference between the car in run with the engine running and the car in run (or electronics only) with the engine off. Will the state pay for dead batteries?

    And of course that is saying nothing about the cost of the drained lead-acid batteries that are in most cars on the road today...

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:What about my batteries? by deniable · · Score: 1

      They'll probably use an e-ink display and embed a long life battery in the plate, otherwise you'd have to retrofit a lot of vehicles with power connections.

    2. Re:What about my batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can install this ass on my car, and they can put in their own fucking power supply system too. Oh, and what if it advertises products I don't approve of? It's balls. I see this ending badly.

    3. Re:What about my batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This seems like it would be an added drain on the car battery

      I suspect the drain on the battery would be negligible, as this can be done with fairly low power.

      The number I'd pay good money for is the total value of the windfall to oil companies caused by the use of full-time headlights. That has to take some decent amount of gasoline to support.

      Don't believe it? Try the experiment I and a friend did around age twelve. He had an old telephone-ringer magneto. You could spin the crank easily and smoothly with nothing connected. But it became extremely difficult and jerky with just a simple Christmas tree light bulb connected

      Now try something similar with a full-sized headlight. I suspect a man of average strength would be unable to turn the crank. Keep in mind how short a time it takes for left-on headlights to kill a battery.

    4. Re:What about my batteries? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > They'll probably use an e-ink display and embed a long life battery in the
      > plate, otherwise you'd have to retrofit a lot of vehicles with power
      > connections.

      They already require a light for the plate.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    5. Re:What about my batteries? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The number I'd pay good money for is the total value of the windfall to oil companies caused by the use of full-time headlights. That has to take some decent amount of gasoline to support.

      You could do the math: It's about 45W to operate a typical headlight. Estimate engines at 25% efficiency and you're being generous; they are only so efficient while cruising, and not all vehicles even achieve such numbers.

      OSRAM has brought out LED headlight modules, some very new cars use them. I am eagerly looking forward to a retrofit kit that I can install in my MBZ. It should come fairly rapidly since it's a model that fell victim to California's retarded sealed beam headlight legislation. The Euro headlights are way better but alas, about $1000 a pair including the connectors.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:What about my batteries? by mog007 · · Score: 1

      That light isn't on when the engine is turned off. And a single tiny light doesn't take near as much energy as an LCD screen with an embedded radio receiver.

    7. Re:What about my batteries? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > That light isn't on when the engine is turned off.

      The plate can contain a rechargeable backup battery or just default to displaying the number when their is no power.

      > And a single tiny light doesn't take near as much energy as an LCD screen
      > with an embedded radio receiver.

      E-ink requires very little power, certainly far less than is available at that lamp socket (which typically takes a 5 watt bulb but you could easily draw an amp or two with no problem).

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  22. Who gets to advertise? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    I would think that they might not want ads for products that impair driving (alcohol for example); it would probably be bad to have cars running ads for Budweiser for example. But then where do they draw the line for who can and who cannot run ads?

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Who gets to advertise? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Kill the fuckers. Seriously, it won't be long until they start putting advertisements directly into our brains, unless you finally stand up and kill the motherfuckers responsible for this shit in the first place.

      Go on and add me to your list. You utterly fail at realizing just how desperately most every politician and lobbyist NEEDS TO DIE RIGHT NOW.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re:Who gets to advertise? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > Kill the fuckers.

      19th century anarchists tried that. Didn't work. To many of them.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    3. Re:Who gets to advertise? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      They didn't have caesium bombs.

      nor did they have high explosives like what we have now.

      Nor did they have weaponry capable of killing from miles away.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  23. Someone is going to hack this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone is going to hack this and make it display goatse.cx...

  24. How about Tetris? by martin-boundary · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't think electronic ads would be that interesting on license plates, but how about a game of Tetris? The car behind could honk once to rotate left, and honk twice to rotate right. This could really reduce boredom in traffic jams!

    1. Re:How about Tetris? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      How would you move the piece left/right? With your turn signals? :p

    2. Re:How about Tetris? by BluBrick · · Score: 2, Funny

      Tetris is a great idea ! However, I propose the following controls:
      Turn signals: Move piece left and right
      Flash high beam: Rotate piece
      Honk horn: Drop piece

      Yes, that would help drivers relax in a stressful traffic jam! Traffic tetris - Brilliant!

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    3. Re:How about Tetris? by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 1

      Use the doors instead, it will require carpooling for highscores and provide an exercise. Also, the technology already exists:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tO52O5VS-GM

    4. Re:How about Tetris? by moonbender · · Score: 1

      You mean you can actually move the pieces on the horizontal axis?! Suddenly the game makes a whole lot more sense!

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    5. Re:How about Tetris? by sorak · · Score: 1

      I think they should add speakers and show "everybody Loves Hypnotoad". That would make the drive home less stressfull.

  25. leave this %^^%&%#$ State by gearloos · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    How much do we have to put up with? I mean, seriously, how much am I supposed to endure before I say these people running this state are out of their minds. this is out of control. seriously, we need to get rid of these idiots.../// help? someone... help please?...--a Californian...

    --
    "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
    1. Re:leave this %^^%&%#$ State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Please don't leave. We don't need you, you don't know how to behave and you're not welcome. You can't help but bring your bat shit crazy leftist nonsense with you so you end up ruining the refugee states you move into. Arizona, Colorado, Texas and the rest would rather you just stay where you belong. Thanks!

  26. sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I always wanted top Rickroll people at stop lights

  27. Re:Really by ChipMonk · · Score: 1

    Or in NorCal.

    I saw a collision in Santa Clara, that wasn't even a fender-bender. Both drivers got out, looked at the damage (just scrapes on the paint), shrugged at each other, got back in their cars, and drove away.

    But a high-tech license plate with active content would never survive even that much.

  28. But does it run linux? by madfilipino · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can't believe no one has asked this yet.

    1. Re:But does it run linux? by davos1 · · Score: 1

      Hope so. Then we could hack it to remove the ads

    2. Re:But does it run linux? by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      I can't believe no one has asked this yet.

      Or "imagine a Beowulf cluster of these things" either.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    3. Re:But does it run linux? by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

      So you can get a General Public Licence plate!

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    4. Re:But does it run linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe no one has asked this yet.

      Sucks to be a nobody don't it?

    5. Re:But does it run linux? by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      It's only a matter of time.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    6. Re:But does it run linux? by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      Funny, I was about to ask, "But is it classy?"

    7. Re:But does it run linux? by toygeek · · Score: 1

      Windows CE

  29. Re:Really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all of the cars I've owned had this thing called a 'bumper' that prevented "a little tap in a parking lot" from contacting my license plate, rear deck lid, and all sorts of other mechanically sensitive items from damage

    face it, you're just making shit up

    what a lame ass argument

  30. I refuse to use this plate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I don't want my shit displaying advertisements of any kind. I purposely buy clothes without logos, shoes without logos, sand the logos off my electronics, etc. Now they want to shove ads into my motherfucking license plate. Fuck you, and fuck the people who passed this bill.

    And anyway, IF they were to be showing ads on MY license plate, I expect ad agencies to pay me for that.

    1. Re:I refuse to use this plate. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      I purposely buy clothes without logos, shoes without logos, sand the logos off my electronics, etc.

      I never thought I'd ever say this to a Slashdotter, but I'd love to look in your closet.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    2. Re:I refuse to use this plate. by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      Ha...

    3. Re:I refuse to use this plate. by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      But it’ll be $1.50 off the normal price of the plates!

      (replace with other trivially-small amount that people will probably still go for)

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  31. But does it run iOS 4? by herojig · · Score: 1

    Seriously, mount the plates ala iPad format in the rear and front windshields, and that gives you driving cameras, handsfree cell phone, and millions of other apps. Police will have access to "Who Is This Bozo" app so the walk back to the patrol car can be eliminated, providing more Krispy Kreme time during the day. Integrate all fast pass accounts, and u will be able to drive in the car pool lane for just 49.99 a trip. This is the perfect example of California once again taking the lead in prudent use of technology, while at the same time saving you, the tax payer...what?

    --
    I think therefore I can't be ~TTNH
  32. Fuck No by Khyber · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I will bill every applicable agency $10,000 for every watt-hour of power the thing consumes.

    Let's see you try to encroach upon my shit, assholes.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:Fuck No by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      While I agree with the sentiment, I'm not sure that license plate belongs to you.

    2. Re:Fuck No by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      The fuel used to transport and power it does.

      Make the invoice out personally to Arnold, so he can see just how much of a pillock he's been.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    3. Re:Fuck No by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Maybe it doesn't belong to you, but as long as it doesn't come with battery or a solar panel, the electricity sure does...

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    4. Re:Fuck No by e4g4 · · Score: 1

      Presuming a non-boneheaded implementation, the amount of fuel it requires to move a car 100 ft would likely power the thing for days. I'm guessing the total impact on your fuel bill will be less than a tenth of a percent.

      --
      The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. - Albert Einstein
    5. Re:Fuck No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You will be forced to consent to get a plate at all, or forced to pay through the nose for the non-subsidized plate

    6. Re:Fuck No by stillnotelf · · Score: 1

      Do you bill them for the power for the little lightbulb that sits above your plate and lights it up so it can be seen easily at night? Maybe CA doesn't require those?

    7. Re:Fuck No by TopSpin · · Score: 1

      Maybe it doesn't belong to you, but as long as it doesn't come with battery or a solar panel, the electricity sure does...

      Am I to understand that headlights are optional because CA does not pay to provide the electricity to light them? Give that a try in traffic court after driving around some night without lights. You comply with automotive regulations. Full stop. Don't like the regulations? Take it up with your elected representatives. Otherwise fuck off.

      --
      Lurking at the bottom of the gravity well, getting old
    8. Re:Fuck No by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "Am I to understand that headlights are optional because CA does not pay to provide the electricity to light them? "

      No, but you are to understand that we have laws against "Attractive Nuisances" and that's EXACTLY what this is.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  33. Electricity? by JumperCable · · Score: 1

    And where are they going to get the electricity for these advertisement plates? Solar panels on the license plate?

    1. Re:Electricity? by Skidborg · · Score: 1

      I believe most cars have these things called batteries. They power the headlights, turn signals, door locks, etc.

      --
      Supporter of the +1 Over Dramatic mod option. In memory of apk.
    2. Re:Electricity? by pmontra · · Score: 1

      Will anybody with an empty battery sue the state under the assumption that the plate-ads consumed that bit of power that prevented the car to start?

      More about litigations: will anybody sue the state when the plate will display an ad of a competitor of the car owner's company?

    3. Re:Electricity? by stealth_finger · · Score: 0

      And who pays for the energy in that battery? Certainly ain't the state.

      You there, take this advert everywhere you go. Keep it powered and let it display whatever we want whenever we want. Yeah, now bend over.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    4. Re:Electricity? by rotide · · Score: 1

      Until the state pays for and maintains my battery plus added fuel costs, I'm not running their devices for them. I don't care how small an amount of money it costs to purchase gas that powers the engine, which powers the alternator, which powers my battery. I'm not paying the state to put a billboard on my car. They need to pay _us_ for that privilege and only if we agree to it.

    5. Re:Electricity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe most cars have these things called batteries. They power the headlights, turn signals, door locks, etc.

      If the electricity to operate the license plate comes from my car's electrical system, either I get the advertising revenue and pick what ad(s) get displayed, or I bill the state -- at a rate I choose -- for the power it consumes.

      And there's always the option of forming a class-action lawsuit against the license plates on the grounds that, by consuming power that has to be generated by the engine, the legislature is mandating an increase in greenhouse-gas emissions and a reduction in gasoline efficiency. Or a ballot proposition outlawing them on the same grounds. It may be a stupid argument, but given all the lawsuits and ballot propositions on equally-stupid grounds, and the wonderful emotional frenzy that could be whipped up with suitably slanted propaganda ("Because they can't take responsibility and balance the budget, Sacramento lawmakers are going to turn your car into a rolling billboard against your will -- one that will cost you money and increase your car's greenhouse-gas emissions to display that advertising -- while keeping all the revenue from selling advertising on your car to cover their own fiscal irresponsibility. Tell Sacramento that they have to do their job without making you an unpaid advertising spokesman for a company whose products you don't use.").

  34. Driving is a privilege, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not an advertisement.

    1. Re:Driving is a privilege, by Stooshie · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unless "Honk" is the product. :-)

      --
      America, Home of the Brave. ... .and the Squaw.
    2. Re:Driving is a privilege, by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      Coming soon, "Honk" brand masturbatory aids!

      Sorry, meds have not kicked in yet...

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    3. Re:Driving is a privilege, by severoon · · Score: 1

      I'm just glad that there's absolutely no way an electronic license plate could be hacked to display whatever the owner wants. Good thing about that, too, because that being the case nothing could possibly go wrong with this plan.

      I do like the idea of being forced by my government to show advertisements on my private property from companies out of my control. Why don't they do this with all our private property, actually? Think of the tax money it would save if your house was a giant diaper ad.

      You know what else they should do, they should cut mirror images of ads into the soles of police jackboots. That way, when they stomp you the state can monetize your bruises.

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
  35. porn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm buying adds for porn! See how long that lasts.

  36. Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this opt-in?
    If yes, then what incentives will you offer people to do so?
    If no, expect a lawsuit to stop you from using my property for your own purposes.
    Do drivers get to decide which adverts they display?
    Do they get compensated for the additional cost of the power to run the display?
    Do they get a cut of the revenue?
    If yes, then how much?
    If not, what about a tax reduction?
    How will people identify parked cars?
    How will you prevent the plates from getting hacked or malfunctioning? (This could help criminals get away and even implicate innocent people for their crimes.)
    Do you ever stop thinking of ways to prostitute yourself and other people for big business interests?

    Why not just mandate state ID cars the size of iPads that you have to wear around your neck. Then you can turn everyone into a walking billboard!

    Bonus points: Make them actual iPads and force everyone to buy one! GDP goes up, tax revenue increases, and your friends at Apple will be a little more generous when you run for re-election.

    Wait, why are you drooling? FFS, I was being sarcastic.

  37. It's all about context by dmomo · · Score: 1

    If the airbag is deployed there will be an ad for a personal injury lawyer. If the car is totaled, as it's hauled away on the wrecker, you'll see insurance ads flashing. If someone is being air lifted in the vicinity, life insurance.

  38. "Crash here for more info!" by abulafia · · Score: 0, Troll

    Ahem.

    --
    I forget what 8 was for.
  39. Likely Scenario by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Someone suddenly and rudely steers into your lane,
    causing you to hit your brakes. Thirty seconds later,
    you both stop for a red light. The ad on his plate reads
    "Verizon covers more of the US...". Next time I shop
    for a phone, I'll be inclined to pick AT&T or Sprint.

  40. story about that... by Max+Threshold · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I grew up in Indiana and lived all over the US. I've always ignored those yellow advisory speed limit signs on curves and stuff. But I discovered that in Tennessee, more than anywhere else, you ignore those at your own peril. Even in a BMW!

    1. Re:story about that... by Eivind · · Score: 3, Informative

      True, it's culturally very different. In Germany "30mph advised" means "it'd take WET ice and summer-tires to make this curve dangerous in 70mph", whereas in parts of Norway, "30 mph advised" means "if you enter this curve in 50mph, you're unlikely to exit it in one piece"

    2. Re:story about that... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, it's safe to ignore those cautionary signs, most of the time. But, you should always be aware of them. Dead Man's Curve on I-90 in Cleveland Ohio pretty much means what it says. The Indian Stairway in Oklahoma says 25 mph on every curve, and you can do 35 on most of them, but two of those curves mean exactly what they say. There are a lot more.

      And, if you're driving a truck or a camper, you had better pay attention too. We have a curve three miles north of my house in Arkansas, with warning signs that say "35 MPH". I can do ~65 in any of my kid's sports cars - but big trucks and campers alike have gone off that curve while doing ~40 - 45 MPH.

      My own personal rule of thumb, is to slow to within 15 MPH of what the sign says BEFORE getting to the curve, then adjust as I see fit as I actually enter the curve.

      I've found a few curves in W. Virginia and N. Carolina that scared the crap out of me, too. My rule of thumb was dangerously to fast for them! It sucks to get into the curve, then realize that it gets sharper before it straightens out!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    3. Re:story about that... by lowlymarine · · Score: 1

      Oh lordy, I lived in Cleveland for a while, and whoever designed that Interstate should be drug out somewhere and shot. A sudden 90-degree curve on an Interstate highway leads to one of the highest traffic fatality spots in the nation? Who would have thought! Living in Cleveland with family in West Virginia, I had a lot of experience on roads there as well. It isn't just curves - the roads in that state in general are downright frightening to drive on.

    4. Re:story about that... by thrawn_aj · · Score: 1

      Yeesh. I commuted to CSU for 3 years down that road. Yeah it's dangerous in winter, but to actually name it "dead man's curve" is melodramatic, not to mention sexist (and inaccurate - I mean consider the number of women ... ah ... never mind). I do agree that it's a design error of epic proportions.

      /Loved to hug that curve at 50 ... but only at night with no one else on the road.

      //It's not 'Need for speed'. Speed is boring. Acceleration rocks! Even centripetal. Rawr!

    5. Re:story about that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a curve like that about half a mile behind my house, and it's really evil.

      I should add that this is in Germany, BTW. The curve in question is part of a cloverleaf connecting two highways; the rule of thumb that you're taught in driving school here is that unless there are signs posting a higher speed limit, you shouldn't always assume a maximum speed of 50 kph there.

      For most ramps etc., you can actually go up to 60 or 70 without problems. This one? 50 IS the maximum you can go, and that's really pushing it - personally, I don't go more than 40 in there, especially since it's also one of the "it gets tighter as you go" kind.

      And because technically, the implied speed limit of 50 kph is OK, there's not even any signs on that one. People who're not familiar with it, and especially people from out of town, are usually quite scared when they go through it for the first time. (And so am I, if I'm the passenger then.)

    6. Re:story about that... by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Germany is phasing out advisory speed limits, which were always rare, anyway, and I don't think I've ever seen one for 30mph/50kph.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    7. Re:story about that... by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      Always love the curve going from the Cross Island Parkway to the Southern Parkway on Long Island - Advisory speen is something like 30mph, and they mean it. What's fun is to look at all the marks/scars on the outside retaining wall of those folks who don't believe that they mean it

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    8. Re:story about that... by Eivind · · Score: 1

      Makes sense, they're pretty silly anyways. Because conditions vary a LOT, so what's perfectly sane on a dry summer road with good tires, would be utter insanity on ice, or even on wet autumn leaves. Okay, so the recommendations are supposed to mean "by good conditions", but still.

      There's more of them in Norway than in Germany, but they're not terribly common.

    9. Re:story about that... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I've seen a semitrailer lying on its side next to the off ramp on one of those cloverleaf style junctions. Didn't actually see it fall over, which is probably a good thing.

      You'd think a professional driver would know that a massive truck doesn't handle like a sports car, but apparently not.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    10. Re:story about that... by guruevi · · Score: 1

      There's a solution for that too, I've seen them I believe in France and in Switzerland (in mountainous areas) there's a sign with 2 or 3 speed limits. One is for cars in good visibility, one is for cars when it's foggy, one is for trucks. They also have arrows on the road that show how far you can see, if you can't see further than 2 or 3 lines you're suggested to use the second speed limit.

      Here in the US however I have lived in the mountainous areas as well and some turns are quite dangerous but the speed limits stay the same (45). However there is a piece of straight road in the middle of the national park where the road dips and the speed limit drops to 35 on top of the hill, if you let yourself roll you can achieve 55 or even 65 but at the bottom of the hill is the local constable. In the US there are two reasons for speed limits: 1) ticket revenue, 2) liability. The liability makes the speed limit so low in some places that unless you're an oversized truck with a manufactured house on your trailer in a snow storm you're going way too slow in just about any condition.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    11. Re:story about that... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's safe to ignore those cautionary signs, most of the time. But, you should always be aware of them.

      I find them to be a distraction more than anything because the information is so frequently misleading. On CA HWY 175 from Hopland to Lakeport there is a turn marked 25 that I can do about 40 in my F250, let alone my 300SD. Right after it there is an unmarked turn which should be posted 20 (I can do about 25 in the benzo.) Fucking useless. Watch the road, and slow down when you get to a curve. Ignore the signs unless they say stop or something.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:story about that... by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      In Ontario, they're ridiculously low, too. Generally what I do is double it and add 10, and then you're taking the corner at a reasonable speed for dry pavement conditions, but not pushing really hard.

      I've seen advisory speeds for 30 km/h. Yes, 30 _kilometres_ per hour. That's 18.5 MPH.
      This corner:

      http://maps.google.ca/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=newbury+ontario&sll=43.260206,-79.932404&sspn=0.472046,1.352692&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=Newbury,+Middlesex+County,+Ontario&ll=42.705966,-81.835721&spn=0.007443,0.021136&t=h&z=16&layer=c&cbll=42.706013,-81.835838&panoid=lC7azMErD58DPgRaFESakA&cbp=12,134.74,,0,16.37

      has such an advisory speed.
      I've successfully taken it, without undue stress, at 80 km/h in several different full size GM vehicles, none with sport suspension, or any particular handling prowess. And this is without leaving my lane, too.

      I'm sure if I took it in a sports car I could easily do it at 100, and an original rubber ball suspension Mini would probably be able to take it at 130 or so. But the legal speed limit on this road is only 80 km/h (50 MPH). So the local government is setting the maximum speed limit at the speed that this corner (the tightest on this stretch of road) can be taken at, then lowering the advisory speed for this corner by over 60%.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    13. Re:story about that... by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Probably at least some of those scars are from people who didn't see the advisory sign, and didn't notice the corner until they'd already hit the wall.....

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    14. Re:story about that... by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      I was going to post something about dead man's curve in Cleveland before you beat me to it.

      What's good is that they're pretty good at letting you know that it's coming, but what's bad is that there isn't another advisory speed limit in the state that means what it says.

    15. Re:story about that... by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      The BIG overhead sign, and the 2 on the sides of the road, with the blinking lights? NOT a small sign

        View Larger Map

      and the 2nd warning

        View Larger Map

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    16. Re:story about that... by blueZ3 · · Score: 1

      In my opinion, decreasing radius curves should be illegal. There's one freeway on ramp in the southern part of San Jose where there are two or three motorcycle accidents every year, because it's a blind curve with a decreasing radius.

      --
      Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    17. Re:story about that... by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Oh, I realize it's probably signed very well (don't live in the area, but I have looked at your helpfully provided pics. Thanks.) but this is idiot drivers we're talking about.

      I was heading toward a construction zone a couple of years back....orange signs and pylons all over the place. And I mean the big 4 foot tall pylons, not the little megaphone shaped ones.... My lane keeps going, the next one to me ends.
      Guy driving beside me in the ending lane while we pass the first construction sign...no change in speed.
          Second construction sign...no change in speed.
      Lane closure ahead sign...no change in speed.

          We were no more than 70 feet from hundreds of orange markers when this guy suddenly slams on his brakes and cranks the wheel over to get in behind me.
      There was no traffic ahead of us, and on a perfectly straight, level road, so nothing at all blocking his view. You could see the amount of orange from a kilometer back. But this guy waits until the last possible second to react, and react violently.

      I can only assume that he didn't see any of it. But he had to be watching the road, or he wouldn't have stayed in his own lane for that long.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    18. Re:story about that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ignore yellow speed advisories because technically there is no limit as they need you to merge with traffic smoothly, so you may on occasion have to exceed the max or go slower than the minimum speed to safely merge.

      As a result, wear the outsides of my front tires very quickly. Brakes? I drive a stick shift, who needs brakes? Heel-toe! :) Plus, in one of my cars, throttle-induced oversteer and major drifting is fun. My daily driver, sadly, is front wheel drive so no throttle-induced oversteer there. My next sedan will be XWD/AWD, or maybe a RWD BMW.

      Of course, that is weather and visibility permitting. If I can't see around a ramp or if it's wet, I keep well below the limit of adhesion, and if vegetation blocks the view around the ramp, I keep it slow enough to come to a stop if I see someone broken down or traffic backed up.

    19. Re:story about that... by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Decreasing radius ramps and switchbacks in the mountains are always fun! Don't use brakes - heel-toe through those! :)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    20. Re:story about that... by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      My own personal rule of thumb, is to slow to within 15 MPH of what the sign says BEFORE getting to the curve, then adjust as I see fit as I actually enter the curve.

      I can respect that. My personal rule of thumb is to take the curve at the speed suggested at least once, then adjust for any future passes.

      Backroads of PA are either 200 year old cowpaths or logging trails. I've even come across roads in which one lane was washed out and the road was collapsing. It stayed that way for 4 years before they fixed it. It's also not uncommon to come across dirt roads within 30 miles of Philadelphia.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    21. Re:story about that... by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      Yeah, lot of drivers like that. The point I was trying to make is that there are a LOT of those signs that don't seem to mean all that much - like the ones you can do 50 in a moving van, and are signed at 30, and then every once in a while, in the same area, you get one that's NOT kidding. That one I sent pictures of, you're PUSHING it at the marked speeds (if you go forward from the second picture you'ss see LOTS of rub marks on the wall). The interesting part is that the trun coming INTO the cross Island on the other end of the parkway (Up by the Whitestone bridge for people who know the other area) is another bad one, but can be taken at higher speeds, if nothing goes wrong. Thing is, there have been at least 2 motorcycle riders killed on that turn recently who misjudged it, ended up in the weeds and dead. All thanks to the crappy designs of the "Master Builder" Robert Moses. That guy had a vision, BUT there were a LOT of mistakes in his designs, like highway ramps with NO acceleration/deceleration lanes

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    22. Re:story about that... by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      There's a very good chance that the reason the route is so boneheaded is not because of some highway engineer's stupidity but rather the stupidity of the eminent domain battles that invariably crop up over any major highway projects.

      Another example of that phenomenon in the same region: I490, which was supposed to run from the I71-I90 intersection east to I271, and would in theory provide good access to Case Western Reserve University and most of the eastern inner-ring suburbs. Instead, the locals in the wealthier suburbs put up a fight, and thus I490 provides excellent access to the housing projects and practically nowhere else.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    23. Re:story about that... by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      In Perth there's one for 20 kph, but it is a real bitch of a corner.

      I'm living in Houston now and sometimes I think they just had a pile of the corner signs printed and erect them randomly. there's one bend on the 610 that's posted for 35 that I've easily taken over 90, then later coming off the 610 onto the 288 it's posted at 40, and at much over 60 I start getting nervous.

    24. Re:story about that... by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Excellent advice. I always follow the signs for corners that I don't know even though I know it'll be way slower than I could do. Once I know the corner a little better I know exactly how much slower it is so I can adjust accordingly.

    25. Re:story about that... by stillnotelf · · Score: 1

      My own personal rule of thumb, is to slow to within 15 MPH of what the sign says BEFORE getting to the curve, then adjust as I see fit as I actually enter the curve.

      A cloverleaf off the interstate near my house worked like this - it was very sharp at the start and end, but gentle in the middle. We saw 18-wheelers spread in pieces down the embankment more than once where they went right off the top.

  41. Privatize everything by crackerpipe · · Score: 0

    Might as well. Our voluminous amounts of tax dollars go only to overpaid public servant salaries these days. There is no money left for license plates, parks, schools, etc. Public employee unions (cops, public office workers, prison guards) will accept furloughs (can sue for back wages later) and layoffs, but never accept wage cuts those of us in the private sector are forced to take during economic contractions. If they would accept wage cuts, there would be far less layoffs, even during these tough times. As for schools, and (underpaid) teachers, wasn't the lottery supposed to ensure 34% of the take went to schools and was never otherwise touched? Yeah, except they passed a different law earlier this year. They're "studying" it now. Hahahah.

    And, lest we forget, since most already have, how did California get into debt? Governor Wilson (R), relaxed the PUC rules in 1996, under the customary & mistaken Republican impression that ALL government regulation and public services, not just unnecessary government regulation and public services, are bad. A little company called "Enron" came around in 2000, and within 2 years, California was billions in debt due to Enron's (illegal) market manipulations. What state do you think they were from? Sound familiar? We've never seen a dollar of that returned, since Bush was running the country. Yep, I can hardly wait for annoying e-ads on underfunded plates. Nice work, guys.
    California Energy Crisis

  42. Re:Really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seen most new car bumpers? Even a smack at 1-2MPH will cause hundreds in repair bills including busting out lights. 5MPH or over? Expect to replace the complete bumper, radiator, radiator cradle, light assemblies, and a lot of other stuff. Oh don't forget all the airbags.

  43. Keyboard? by lopaka1998 · · Score: 2, Funny
    What a wonderful idea - especially the way California drivers drive... All they need to do is add a keyboard for the driver. You can text the person in front of you or behind you... imagine the possibilities...

    "Hey, you, assh*** where the f**k did you learn to drive?!!!"

    No more need to use the horn.

    1. Re:Keyboard? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Hey, you, assh*** where the f**k did you learn to drive?!!!

      Likely response:

      “California, (expletive)... where did YOU learn to drive?”

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  44. Green technology by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    California is totally into green technology lately. I've got a great idea for them. Normal non-powered license plates. Once created they use no energy and produce no emissions.

    1. Re:Green technology by halowolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, and what do the powered license plates display when they break? And what will they display when hacked?

    2. Re:Green technology by SolitaryMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, and what do the powered license plates display when they break? And what will they display when hacked?

      The second one is easy: porn

      --
      May Peace Prevail On Earth
    3. Re:Green technology by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      Bigger worry - what supplies the power to the plate? If it is from the car battery, I can see a lot of unhappy owners. Then again, if power isn't needed for the numbers, I can also see this making a lot of happy owners who are at least minimally creative *snip*.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    4. Re:Green technology by heritage727 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, and what do the powered license plates display when they break?

      The blue license plate of death?

    5. Re:Green technology by Captain+Hook · · Score: 1

      maybe it will use e-paper type of display, readable in sunlight. consumes no power when not changing the display.

      --
      These comments are my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the other voices in my head.
    6. Re:Green technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goetse on a car? ....

    7. Re:Green technology by mpe · · Score: 1

      California is totally into green technology lately. I've got a great idea for them. Normal non-powered license plates. Once created they use no energy and produce no emissions.

      And are unlikely to cause problems if someone wants to take their car/truck out of California (or even out of the US).

  45. Whatever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This idea is too stupid to be taken seriously but so is Hitler.

    I love in TFA how they state their goal is not to turn everyones license plates into a roving billboard. This was of course after mentioning the whole point of the exercise is to find additional revenue streams to counter the states budget deficit.

    Doubletalk is the hallmark of human stupidity. Heres an idea how you can save money and balance your budget California... Get rid of the stupid asshats your paying to come up with shit like this.

  46. Wouldn't want to be looking where we're going? by leftie · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't want to be looking at the road as we're driving when we can be looking at advertising.

  47. What an excellent way to reduce carbon emissions! by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 1

    It's great to see California taking such strides to reduce carbon emissions. Take something which was previously just a static plate of painted metal, and replace it with a high-tech display which continuously consumes energy. What an excellent plan.

    What will these plates show when the engine is off? And, more to the point, for how long will they show it before the battery is so drained the engine cannot be restarted?

    --
    I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
  48. Criminals and car theifs would love it by S3D · · Score: 1

    Just common occurrence - ad stuck on malfunctioning license plate. No license number is visible, but no one is paying attention - it happens too often. Or even better - with little tinkering a criminal can change license number on the run...

  49. Pb vs U by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

    It is not the shell casings, it is the bullet or the shot inside shotgun shells. Birds that bottom feed eat the used shot on the bottom of lakes and waterways causing the lead to get into the (animal) food chain. It is not just waterfowl, scavengers such as the condor are also effected

    Obviously, bullet manufacturers should immediately switch to depleted uranium instead. It would eliminate the lead poisoning issue completely.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    1. Re:Pb vs U by tsotha · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now that's a good idea. That way if you ever run across an armored pheasant you'll still knock that sucker down. And since DU is pyrophoric by the time you get there he'll be cooked, too.

    2. Re:Pb vs U by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      Wish I could mod this up...

      Instead I will question those that happen to eat Condors... Why exactly would you do that? They're not exactly tasty... Some depleted uranium might change that over the next few generations though... Good shout.

  50. Heat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever leave a calculator out in the sun? Once the screen gets hot enough, the LCD just turns black. No power needed. And it may not look right again after. I give them about 10 minutes in the parking lot on a hot L.A. day.

  51. hi by helentaylor21 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The article said it was to prevent animals from swallowing spent casings and introducing lead into the food chain. I couldn't speak to the likelihood or real impact of that actually happening. http://latestnewscheck.blogspot.com/2010/06/tel-launches-suns-world-cup-song-from.html

  52. At least they are thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, when i first read the headline, i thought: "Oh, little advert stickers on license plates. Gonna be hard to see." Electronic license plates doesn't seem like it would be very profitable for the state. How about selling add space on state vehicles? I think they could get more bucks for their bang that way. I'm sure someone will find something wrong with that eventually, but for now, with state budgets in the toilet, I say go for that...electronic license plates are gonna flop though.

    1. Yeah, bad guys can re-program them.
    2. The cost to produce will greatly marginalize their proceeds.
    3. Unless they are very rugged (which would add to #2) they are gonna break from rocks etc. constantly. I don't think the people are gonna like having to buy new ones all the time.

    USE STATE VEHICLES AS ADVERTISING SPACE!!!

  53. Can it say "STOLEN" if somebody steals your car? by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That would be cool. Apart from that it's all fail.

    --
    No sig today...
  54. This is a stupid formula by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People drive at what *they* perceive a safe speed to be, not what is a safe speed.

    People also drive at a distance behind other cars at which they perceive to be safe.

    How many people stay the requisite 3 seconds behind other cars? (or even longer on wet/icey roads)

    How many people are aware of why that 3 second rule exists and understand it enough to obey it?

    The point here is that people will drive in a manner that is neither safe for themselves or others on the road because they can and because they think it is ok without understanding why it isn't.

    1. Re:This is a stupid formula by somersault · · Score: 1

      Over here it's the "2 second rule".. got to love all these arbitrary speed limits and rules. 2 seconds is definitely enough, 3 must be for people who are asleep at the wheel.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:This is a stupid formula by thrawn_aj · · Score: 1

      I would love to trust the instinct of the common man on the road were it not for the sad fact that physics is optional in high school and the dynamics of objects moving at upwards of 20 mph is not something that's rooted in our DNA as so many drivers appear to believe.

      I have a simple rule that has served me well (10 years of driving - in several states and one cross-country drive - and not a single collision/ticket). 30% concentration at a base level. Add 10 more to allow for road/weather/car conditions. Add 20 more to correct for other people's mistakes/stupidity. That's nearly perfect safety right there without having to drive like a 90 year old and I still have processing power left over for changing the radio station. /Still don't use a cellphone while driving - math doesn't work out unless I talk only in binary (yes/no).

    3. Re:This is a stupid formula by sco08y · · Score: 1

      The point here is that people will drive in a manner that is neither safe for themselves or others on the road because they can and because they think it is ok without understanding why it isn't.

      You're saying some people ignore all these useful rules or never bother to learn them. And you want to lower the speed limit for everyone because of them. This is in spite of the fact that you don't even believe the people who drive dangerously will obey the speed limits.

      So you've started with 15% of the drivers who just naturally won't drive safely, and you're setting bullshit speed limits that the 80% of reasonably good drivers will ignore.

      How has this improved the situation?

    4. Re:This is a stupid formula by andi75 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My car has a built-in range check and its computer tells me how far behind I am behind the car in front of me.

      I feel most comfortable at a time distance of +3 seconds and let the car drive in cruise control then, which I turn off at 2.0-2.5 seconds. I have currently set the range check to start blinking warningly at 1.5 seconds or less. At that point you really need to be paying very close attention to what's going on on the road (yes, that means watching quite a few cars ahead). When it's at less then 1.2 seconds I usually put my foot on the brake to be able to quickly react to anything (and it's high time to lose some speed anyway).

      If someone cuts into the lane right in front of me it sometimes goes down to 0.8 seconds. Needless to say that I make damn sure it doesn't stay that way for long.

    5. Re:This is a stupid formula by theJML · · Score: 1

      I used to drive 3 seconds behind other cars. I found that to be a very bad idea because other people will cut in between, usually at the worst possible time, changing your 3 second cushion to 0.5 seconds. I've found paying attention and retaining a 1.5-2 second gap seems to be the best bet. I know I can stop in that time (unless a brick wall instantly appeared) and no one cuts in to screw up the cushion.

      I've also found that it's much better to be slightly aggressive/pro-active than it is to be defensive or hesitant. In most cases I've seen accidents, it was due to one or more parties hesitating and not going when they should have.

      'course this is something I've learned, and not something I was taught. I actually purposely changed my driving style after my first (and only) accident while in High School and I've been unscathed ever since, including many situations that would have otherwise ended in bent steel and free-flowing liquids had I hesitated and not acted quickly.

      --
      -=JML=-
    6. Re:This is a stupid formula by LoztInSpace · · Score: 1

      You sound very sensible but yoy post gives me an opportunity to rant about one of my pet peeves: braking to turn off cruise control. Please just use the switch! It's very disconcerting to see brake lights @ 110 on a freeway and it can (and does) set off chain reactions.
      nothing personal - just a good post to hook onto.

    7. Re:This is a stupid formula by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > It's very disconcerting to see brake lights @ 110 on a freeway and it can
      > (and does) set off chain reactions.

      If you weren't tailgating it wouldn't bother you.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    8. Re:This is a stupid formula by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3 second? Hmm never heard that one I was taught and always heard the 2 second rule. But 3 is cool...

      In the great state of NC, it seems, if you cant read the expiration sticker on the license plate. You are too far back. After moving here I asked around. *NO* one had even heard of the 2 second rule or any sort of rule like that. They simply were not even taught proper distance control. Never mind merging into a highway. It is NOT a race to see if you can run the person into the shoulder.

      People seem to all think they are above average drivers. When the reality is most people are average and many are overly aggressive. There are good drivers out there. However, they are not the ones who drive crazy (driving crazy != good driver). They are the ones driving the Volvo (because of its high safety ratings), keeping up with the flow of traffic, and letting people merge in and out of traffic as needed. You do not notice them because they are GOOD. Around here it is mini vans and Chevy trucks you keep your eyes pealed for. The type of car varies state to state too which makes it fun driving around.

    9. Re:This is a stupid formula by Wilden2003 · · Score: 1

      If I followed the 3 second rule, I would never get where I was going on the freeway. At 60mph, 3 seconds is 264ft. Do you know that even semi-trucks are going to fill that hole. Then I have to drop back to 264ft behind them. And then more more vehicles will fill that. Pretty soon even the white hairs, are looking at me funny, as they pull in front of me. Next thing you know, I'm driving in reverse.

    10. Re:This is a stupid formula by 3dr · · Score: 1

      On most (city) highways I drive, it's impossible to maintain a 2-second gap for the simple reason that someone will come along and pull into that "large" gap. You'd have to drive considerably slower than traffic to maintain a large enough stopping space, while turning yourself into a hazard to gaining cars. It would be interesting to have a range checker in the car, as you do.

      On highways outside of cities, maintaining such a gap is easy.

    11. Re:This is a stupid formula by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      At that point you really need to be paying very close attention to what's going on on the road (yes, that means watching quite a few cars ahead).

      You need to be doing that anyways. Letting a computer (a rangefinder) tell you how much of your attention should be dedicated to the road is precisely the kind of lazy driving that A) gets people killed and B) requires the enforcement of arbitrary, batshit-insane laws that designed to ensure stupid people don't kill themselves. Do yourself a favor, turn off the rangefinder, go take a motorcycle safety course, learn how to ride a motorcycle, and learn how to remain alert to all of your surroundings for the entirety of your trip. It saves the rest of us the burden of having to compensate for your lack of inattention because your rangefinder isn't squealing at you.

    12. Re:This is a stupid formula by sexconker · · Score: 1

      How many people stay the requisite 3 seconds behind other cars? (or even longer on wet/icey roads)

      How many people are aware of why that 3 second rule exists and understand it enough to obey it?

      Requisite?
      I think it's you who doesn't understand the 3 second rule. It's there to allow:

      0.5 seconds of reaction time
      1 second of "I'll coast to save gas. I'm sure he'll get off the brake soon."
      0.5 second of half-hearted braking
      0.5 seconds of OHSHIT braking
      0.5 seconds of stopping distance variability

      All you need is a 1 second rule with a "PAY ATTENTION" corollary.

    13. Re:This is a stupid formula by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      In L.A., drivers behind you will generally not tolerate a gap of more than about .8 - 1 second in front of you, and will pass you and cut back in if you leave one that large.

    14. Re:This is a stupid formula by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Still don't use a cellphone while driving - math doesn't work out unless I talk only in binary (yes/no).

      Try talking in English and doing the math in binary.

    15. Re:This is a stupid formula by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that's how a traffic ripple (beginnings to stop and go traffic) is formed!

    16. Re:This is a stupid formula by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      I like 3 seconds on open highways, but you're right about people cutting in on you. I still haven't found a good way to drive through Houston traffic. Sitting right behind people just makes you wear your brakes out faster, leaving more than a car length is asking to be cut off...

    17. Re:This is a stupid formula by DavidYaw · · Score: 1

      My car has a built-in range check and its computer tells me how far behind I am behind the car in front of me.

      ...I have currently set the range check to start blinking warningly at 1.5 seconds or less. ...

      What car has these features? Sometimes I check myself by timing 2 seconds, but keeping my eyes fixed on some feature on the road surface or roadside for 2 seconds isn't the safest thing.

    18. Re:This is a stupid formula by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      2 seconds for ABS or non-ABS? They said 4 when I learned. And that's assuming you're actually 100% paying attention at the time. With the cell phones and all, what are the odds?

      People habitually sitting less than 2 car-lengths off your back bumper at 60mph is just retarded. And when they have to keep tapping their brakes, you'd think they'd be reminded of how dangerous a situation they're putting themselves in, banking on the fact that the guy in front of them doesn't slow down by more than 5 mph.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    19. Re:This is a stupid formula by andi75 · · Score: 1

      The Peugeot 5008 has a distance alert. I've been driving it for 4 months now, and I'm quite happy with it, apart from the fact that eats 8.0 - 8.5 liters / 100 km (27.6 - 29.4 miles per gallon according to google).

    20. Re:This is a stupid formula by thrawn_aj · · Score: 1

      lolwut? All I meant was, there's insufficient % concentration left to allow for full conversation - hence, no cellphone. Thanks for the chuckle though - I needed that =D

    21. Re:This is a stupid formula by somersault · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming it's with ABS considering it's been common for 20 or 30 years..

      Yeah sitting at 2 car lengths is stupid, the best measure is time. I sometimes end up around 1.5 seconds behind people when going around town, but that's in slow traffic and I do pay attention. The only time I really get distracted is if I have to really think about an answer for a passenger - it disrupts the internal observation monologue I picked up in my advanced driving course..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    22. Re:This is a stupid formula by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually my city did this, on several major 4-lane roads, they changed the speed limit to 45 to 55.

      when it was 45, people went 55, 60 mph. Now it's a pain in the ass to go 55 mph because most people are cruising at 45 now..

      Another example, Apple Valley, CA, speed limit is 60 mph through town, most people go... *drumroll* 45 or 50 mph.

      People do have their version of the speed limit, but for some reason, when you change it to the speed they're likely to go, they'll stay under, they suddenly feel that it's too fast. It's weird, but damn it's working.

    23. Re:This is a stupid formula by knarf · · Score: 1

      My car has a built-in range check and its computer tells me how far behind I am behind the car in front of me.

      My head has a built-in range check and its brain tells me how far behind I am behind the car in front of me.

      --
      --frank[at]unternet.org
  55. 200 replies and not a single "My other car" jokes? by zill · · Score: 1

    My other car isn't a moving billboard.

  56. Cal legislature keeps a longstanding tradition... by Bob_Who · · Score: 1

    .... Criminals make license plates.

  57. Does it ever end? by BinBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At what point is the beast satisfied? Couldn't we agree on some reasonable percentage of the total personal/corporate income and then force the government to spend within that limit?

    1. Re:Does it ever end? by dotfile · · Score: 1

      We could, if it were not a one-sided battle. The government is who decides what percentage is "reasonable". It seems that the current feeling is leaning toward 100% being "reasonable", with a little doled out to keep us voting them into power while being utterly dependent upon government services. It's because, you see, they're SO Much smarter than we are, and SO better able to spend our - er, their - money for our benefit.

      Now, if only there were some way we could actually take control of the government... but I guess that's just a crazy idea.

  58. Too fast for speed camera? by rainmouse · · Score: 1

    Yes because slowing down to prevent speeding tickets would be illogical....

    Actually, according to the following video clip, if you exceed speeds of 170mph you go too fast for speed cameras to catch you.

    Not that I would obviously recommend doing this.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ph-qv4gYAE8

  59. Re:Can it say "STOLEN" if somebody steals your car by thrawn_aj · · Score: 1

    Ha! Even better, have it flash "help!" messages randomly as if it was a kidnapped child =]. While we're at it, put a small display in the dash to do the same thing and freak the shit out of the thief. "You have accessed this vehicle illegally. It will detonate at a random time with the next 10 hours. Please wear your seat-belt and drive safely."

  60. Airbus by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

    Wow, California will put an Airbus on every license plate!
    Or did I mis-read EAds?

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  61. Condors aren't affected, study wasnt credible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was debunked years ago

  62. Idiocracy by Israfels · · Score: 1

    Anyone notice how the government is becoming more like the government in the movie "Idiocracy"?...."Brought to you by Carl's Jr."

    1. Re:Idiocracy by dotfile · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. One movie I believe everyone should see, at least once. My only fear is that it won't take us a few hundred years - more like a few dozen at the rate we seem to be going.

  63. What they send to the Feds doesn't matter by Shivetya · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The state and federal taxes are not related. It does not matter how much the people of California pay to the federal government, only how much they pay to their own state. Now if your saying that the forty billion dollar difference is not making up for unfunded mandates at the federal level, well boo hoo, that still does not help California's problem.

    California's problem is based in part on too many entitlements, too much pay and benefits to the government workers, and far too many people off the tax rolls. The amounts going to pay government employee pay, pensions, and benefits, is staggering and only getting worse as politicians pay that group to keep themselves in power.

    No, having that forty billion extra won't save California, they need to have reasonable expenditures before any amount of income matters. The sad part is, many states in the Northeast US are in worse shape but you never hear of it

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:What they send to the Feds doesn't matter by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The state and federal taxes are not related. It does not matter how much the people of California pay to the federal government, only how much they pay to their own state.

      The money is collected from taxes and sent out of the state, that sounds like a problem to me. We're not printing the fucking money and sending it to them. The money comes ultimately from businesses and individuals throughout California, and we're funding other people's mandates! Why should any state that can't stand on its own continue to exist? If the state isn't worth having around on its own merits, merge it with some state that is, and take a star off the damned flag.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:What they send to the Feds doesn't matter by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      The money is collected from taxes and sent out of the state, that sounds like a problem to me.

      Well, OK, but under what mechanism do you divert the federal taxes being paid by Califronians directly into state coffers?

      If the state isn't worth having around on its own merits, merge it with some state that is, and take a star off the damned flag.

      Or split it up. Most ideas involve creating North and South California although some posit a three state split.

      Or just get this dump into bankruptcy ASAP.

    3. Re:What they send to the Feds doesn't matter by kryptKnight · · Score: 1

      "The money is collected from taxes and sent out of the state, that sounds like a problem to me." That's the entire fucking point of government, to reapportion wealth to the benefit the collective. If taxes were distributed directly back to who paid them there would be no point in taxing people at all.

      --
      Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. -Aldous Huxley
  64. G3t your ch33p v14gr4! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or any ad that seem appropriate...

  65. I sense a Dragon's Den opportunity... by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

    Two words: Adblock Sunglasses.

    (I'd polarise lenses perpendicular to that of the LCD filter.)

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  66. Re:Hacked by Macrat · · Score: 1

    They will display Goatse of course.

  67. car by helix2301 · · Score: 1

    This is defiantly kind of neat I must say the whole advertising license plate I think is very cool and geek like. I can see peoples concerns on the front of theft and reprogramming of the plate. But again its just as easy now 2 screws and you have a new plate on the car.

  68. How will the owner of the vehicle get compensated? by loudheart · · Score: 2, Funny

    California gets 30% and owner gets 70% of the ad revenue?

  69. Inevitable decrease in speed limits over time by tepples · · Score: 0

    find that 85th percentile, and post that as the speed limit.

    Great. Now you have a guaranteed revenue source from issuing speeding tickets to 15 percent of drivers. Say the speed limit on a given road is initially 30 miles per hour after an 85th percentile survey. But after the signs are posted, 85 percent of people start going 27 or slower either due to increased pedestrian traffic at intersections or to have a cushion in case of a miscalibrated speedometer. Another 10 percent go 28-30, and 5 percent speed. Then the next review revises the speed limit down to 25 (the new 85th percentile rounded down), and the 10 percent who were going 28-30 would also be guilty of speeding.

    Or imagine what happens once fuel prices climb so high that 16 percent of vehicles are non-motorized, that is, bicycles. An 85th percentile review would revise the speed limit down to 20 MPH on major collector roads through parts of a city.

  70. Re:How will the owner of the vehicle get compensat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    California gets 100% of the revenue and the owner gets a slightly higher gas bill.

  71. When the only highway is too fast for your car by tepples · · Score: 0

    My advice would be to stay off of any highway where the speed limit exceeds 80MPH.

    I can think of a lot of people who wouldn't find that practical if, say, the only highway from the city where someone lives to the city where his mother lives has a speed that his vehicle can't safely maintain.

    1. Re:When the only highway is too fast for your car by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are always other roads. The Interstate is never the only path.

  72. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unworkable. Minor rear end impact which ordinarily would only dent a steel license plate will break an e-license plate. Will your insurance go up to cover the cost of these breakages? How quickly will the e-plate be replaced so that you are not driving without a license plate? Will you be required to maintain a steel 'emergency' plate? How many times will the state replace your e-plate for free? e.g. your new driver son or careless driver wife regularly reverse the car into the garage door - that has little or no impact to your existing steel plate, but regularly smashes your e-plate.

    Seems to me this scheme will cost more money to run/maintain than the revenue it generates.

  73. Maintenance by gorfie · · Score: 1

    So, who is responsible for fixing the ad plates when they break? If the mechanism fails, is the automobile owner expected to take the initiative to bring the vehicle in for repairs? Is the government going to cover the cost of repairs? I imagine this ad mechanism will be highly prone to failure as people will be tempted to disable the mechanism (whether that be on their own cars or the cars of strangers). Now if the government of California offered incentives for the ad plates that might change things...

    1. Re:Maintenance by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I imagine this ad mechanism will be highly prone to failure as people will be tempted to disable the mechanism (whether that be on their own cars or the cars of strangers).

      If the plates are generally reliable this is a non-problem. You just pull over anyone whose plate is failing. If they are generally unreliable then criminals will under or overvolt them to fry them, because if most of them fail then they won't bother to pull people over for a failed plate except as the usual bullshit pretext.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Maintenance by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there will be a huge incentive for you to have a functioning "ad-plate" on your car at all times. When the failure to do so incurs a higher vehicle use tax. Say $200 week.

      California isn't doing this to make money, they are doing it to survive. This sounds like an interesting way for a state to get some more revenue, as idiotic as it sounds. It is at least not doing what other states already do - making you pay a personal property tax on your car yearly. In Arizona, which is a rather tax-light state, I get to pay over $800 a year for license plates because of this.

      So yes, they are paying you to have ads on your car. And yes, there is a huge incentive to have it working because they will absolutely tax the heck out of you if it isn't.

    3. Re:Maintenance by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 1

      CA calls it a vehicle license fee but it's basically a property tax on vehicles.

  74. State-owned black box on every car by John+Hasler · · Score: 3, Interesting

    > ...it's designed to display warnings for local traffic conditions so it
    > presumably has built-in GPS to know where you are.

    Short-range roadside transmitters would suffice for that (paid for by the company so that they can sell local ads). However, this is an opportunity to get state-owned black boxes onto every car in the state. Initially, of course, Californians will be assured that no information will be gathered. Then the exceptions will start creeping in. Finally, a connector will be mandated and the plate plugged into the vehicle CAN bus.

    It will be a felony to meddle with the plate in any way, including suppressing the ads.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:State-owned black box on every car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then the exceptions will start creeping in.

      Finally a comment that gets at what's really going on with a bill like this.

  75. hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    portable zombie signs anyone..?

  76. Jobs strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iPlate with iAd. All part of the vision.

  77. Hang on a demimo by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Isn't it irrelevant whether or not the car is moving? I've never driven a car where I could see my own plate from the driver's seat.

    The display on a stationary car could distract other drivers who are moving. Or am I missing something?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  78. broken by jDeepbeep · · Score: 4, Funny

    what do the powered license plates display when they break?

    PC_LOAD_AD

    --
    Reply to That ||
    1. Re:broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PC_LOAD_AD?

      What the fuck does that mean?

    2. Re:broken by superdave80 · · Score: 1

      PC_LOAD_AD?!?!?

      What the fuck does that even mean? /me grabs baseball bat and gangsta rap CD

  79. And you'll be paying me how? by MadCow42 · · Score: 1

    Advertise on my car, pay me money. End of story.

    --
    I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
  80. A sentence never before heard... by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

    "Sorry officer, I didn't realize my licence plate was burned out". Speaking of which, who's financially, (or even legally), responsible for a malfunctioning licence plate?

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    1. Re:A sentence never before heard... by rotide · · Score: 1

      If it isn't law now it will be. You of course. Along with checking tire pressure, fluid levels, etc, you need to make sure the license plate is in full advertising order before leaving your parking space.

      If it burns out while driving, well, it will be assumed you didn't verify operation prior to departure.

  81. My car is not a billboard / Ad choice? by Kenshin · · Score: 1

    My car is not a billboard. It's my property, and one could say an extension of myself. I refuse to even have those tacky dealership frames around my plates. Why in the world would I want to have an electronic sign on it?

    Even if I were forced into it, do I get to choose the ads? If I hate Pepsi, I'd hate to have a Pepsi ad randomly show up on the back of my car.

    --

    Does it make you happy you're so strange?

  82. Re:What an excellent way to reduce carbon emission by archangel9 · · Score: 1

    for how long will they show it before the battery is so drained the engine cannot be restarted?

    probably right up until the battery dies.

  83. two words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    distracted driving

  84. Fragile? by tekrat · · Score: 1

    I realize Parallel Parking isn't a big deal in California, land of the parking lot, but I assume in big cities like LA or San Fran, people backing up into your car will damage the plate.

    I live in NJ, but drive into Manhattan often, and I've had to squeeze my car into some pretty tricky spots. While the rear plate is OK, my front plate, which attaches to the bumper, is practically bent in half, has the paint peeling off; basically it's in bad shape. Can you imagine if this was an LCD screen? It wouldn't even display the plate number at this point, much less any ads.

    So when the cop pulls me over, is it my fault or the state's that they made a fragile device that breaks if some other guy hits it? So now, not only do you have to worry about a broken tail-light every time you go to the supermarket, you also have to worry about your license plate being out.

    And how long a line will you have to wait in to get your broken plate replaced? Or is this something dealerships will have to service?

    I predict a lot of hacks for these plates to display porn. In fact, I have to wonder if the porn industry wouldn't be the first to advertise on these plates! After all, they were the first to advertise on the internet.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:Fragile? by csrjjsmp · · Score: 1

      Good thing this is rear plate only.

  85. Poorly Targeted Ads by stewbacca · · Score: 1

    Anyone who knows anything about advertising knows you try to get the most eyes for the money you spend. This is wasted money because people won't be looking at the car in front of them, so they'll never see the ads. Instead, they should send the ads to the drivers' cell phones.

  86. Will not work in areas that get lots of snow and p by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Will not work in areas that get lots of snow and how do you power them? LP lights that only come up with the front lights? the SUN? What if the battery dies?

    The car is off?

    The plate get's hit and the screen stops working?

  87. Enter state surveillance of your driving by intheshelter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm stunned I haven't heard this from anyone else, but you know these will have to be wirelessly connected somehow so it can update with the latest advertising. And with that wireless connection is a nice easy way for the state to Lojack your car and know exactly where you are every minute of the day. How convenient.

  88. Next year's article on California road collisions by turthalion · · Score: 1

    "And figures just released this week show that rear-end collisions at traffic lights skyrocketed in California in 2010. Authorities are baffled as to the causes."

    At one extremely busy intersection near me (Fermor & Lagimodiere in Winnipeg, right near the Royal Canadian Mint), the mint has got a huge video screen playing ALL THE TIME visible to southbound and westbound traffic. It's VERY distracting, and I've seen several people drift over a lane (only to violently correct themselves) while heading through the intersection and staring at the billboard.

    This in a city where the roads are frequently snow- and ice-covered as well. Nice one, Canadian government.

    --
    Michael Coyne
    http://turthalion.blogspot.com
  89. Re:Hacked by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

    They will display Goatse of course.

    So, a reflection of the state's current budgetary condition...

    --
    You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  90. Re:Ways for California to make money by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    Hmm. Troll? Why?

    Is it because he pointed out a problem without offering a solution?

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  91. Re:200 replies and not a single "My other car" jok by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    I tip my hat to you, sir. That was good.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  92. How About this California? by gsmraxe · · Score: 1

    Stop spending so much money.

  93. Choose your advertisement! by Bearded+Frog · · Score: 1

    Pretty soon we wont be able to choose colours for our cars. Only different adverts. It will look like nascar but at least the politicians will be driving their ferraris still.

  94. Better be opt-in! by kheldan · · Score: 1

    If this passes into law, it had better be opt-in. Do not want!

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  95. Awesome! by sherriw · · Score: 1

    I can't wait to start making money off of my license plate. Oh wait... who gets the ad revenue exactly? Oh..

    What's next- ads on my garbage cans, my mail box and the bandages I'm wrapped in when I go to the hospital?

    Ug.

  96. I'm not buying $800 license plates by swschrad · · Score: 1

    and I'm not paying another $30 a month for the wireless service to change the ads.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  97. Fun and Law by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    How does this work out with the requirement that states must respect one another's laws? Does it mean every other state is obligated to allow changeable license plates in their jurisdiction, or that California needs to fuck off because no state need accept these? Am I going to have to rent a car every time I leave California? (If you don't want to be pulled over repeatedly, it's a good idea already... Nobody likes Californians, just our media and money.)

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  98. You have to be kidding me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IIRC, aren't those novelty LED blinky scrolly message license plates holder illegal in many states, explicitly or implicitly by distracted drivers laws? Is California not one of those states?

    Not to even get into the blatant conflicts of interest by having the government become an advertiser, what about the amorality of now forcing citizens to promote products and services they themselves may disapprove of?

    I am deeply offended by PETA, and do not want them using my back bumper for advertisement -- so what of that? I use them as an example because they are a likely early adopter of something like this. They can't resist a chance to spout off the "kill all humans, the bees are being oppressed" inanity.

  99. My thought by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you want to put an advertisement on my car you can god damn well pay me for the privilege!

    --
    If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
  100. So... do they pay us for displaying the ads? by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

    that is my only question.

    --
    Huh?
  101. RTFA. Doesn't actually institute program. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The bill has no formal opposition because it doesn't actually institute the electronic license plates. The bill simply allows the CA DMV to research the feasibility of such a program and report its findings to the legislature in 2 years.

  102. Nuther goood one...Ghost of Z'Berg lives on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many many years ago when I was twenty three,
        a representative named Z'berg foisted this on me.
    If I was found a ridin my scoot without a belt that tied me awn
        so that if'n I crashed my useless corpse would dekorate some lawn,
    Why then the Chips would dance with glee
          and hang a big fat ticket on me.

  103. I Better Get Paid for This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first thing I do when I buy a car is take off the dealer license plate frame. Want me to advertise for you? Pay me.

    I'll still say no, but at least you've addressed the fact that it's my car, not yours.

  104. California Wants by lotho+brandybuck · · Score: 1

    You could've just stoped at "California Wants.."

  105. Enititlement issues? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Listen people, you don't own the roads and you don't own the license plates. The government does. And they say that your car must have one of their license plates if you want to drive on their roads. They can do whatever they want to their plates and you can't do anything about it because they are not yours. If you don't like it build your own roads or vote for people that do what you want.

    1. Re:Enititlement issues? by tc3driver · · Score: 1

      They do, but, I do own my car. I pay ridiculous amounts in taxes for said roads. I also pay registration as another tax. They can do to the plate what they want, but so can I as an act of Free Speech.

      These things are going to consume some power... is the government going to lower taxes on fuel to compensate for the amount of fuel it takes to power these license plates?

      Maybe they will be battery operated... what happens when the battery dies? I will say what others have said, if I wanted to drive around a billboard for others, I'll choose who I advertise for.

      You know as well as I do, the day these are foisted on people, they will be hacked. That is more of my tax money wasted. I really think that is the crux of the issue, it is nothing more than a flagrant waste of tax money on something that is going to end up costing more in the future than it is worth.

      --
      42 69 6C 6C 20 47 61 74 65 73 20 69 73 20 61 20 77 68 6F 72 65 21
  106. Cars have their VIN stamped in the body ... by tim_gladding · · Score: 1

    Cars have their VIN stamped in the body in multiple places.

  107. Duct Tape! by BurzumNazgul · · Score: 1

    Rumor has it that advertising on these plates can be disabled with some kind of duct tape mod

    --
    I can say [REDACTED] anytime I want!
  108. 29 Cent Sharpie by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Problem solved.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  109. Big Brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's to stop the addition of a tracking device?

  110. Happens when you elect a cyborg from the future! by SlappyBastard · · Score: 1

    Seriously. Do people in California ever look around at each other and just say, "Wow. We're fucking retarded. Maybe next time we'll just elect, I dunno, an actual fucking adult to be governor."

    --
    I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
  111. Look! let me take a picture with my... crash!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look! let me take a picture with my... crash!!!

    Yup, idiots will now txt while driving about the ads AND take pictures for the ads... Brilliant!

  112. and black cars.... by gearloos · · Score: 1

    It will look great on any color car except black ones, ya know, the color Arnold says is not environmentally friendly and they were thinking of outlawing....What a bunch of #$^&ing morons this state has elected...only fix is to throw the hole crap ridden batch of politicians out and start from scratch.

    --
    "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
  113. California is Hurting by BestWicklessCandles · · Score: 1

    Right now the state of California will do any to generate money. This is crazy!

  114. Ad supported plates. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So this means I wont have to pay $500+ a year to renew my registration, right? Because it will be supported by ads, right?

    No? Do I at least get any money for my car being used as a mobile billboard? Can I opt out?

    No? Well.... I don't see how this benefits me, or anyone for that matter.

  115. Oh for fucks sake! by dogzdik · · Score: 0
    Don't these cunts ever let up? What next? Special genetically engineered crops that produce methane digesting emzymes to make glow in the dark shit that lights up at night saying "Wonkies Hemorrhoid Cream"...

    Fucking telephone SMS spam, telemarketers, wall to wall fucking adds on TV., even fucking more adds on pay TV., adds every 30 seconds on the radio, letter boxes stuffed full of junk mail...

    Isn't there even ONE square inch of surface anywhere left on the face of the earth that doesn't have a fucking ADVERTISMENT on it?

    --

    .

    Voting up, Voting down - If I really gave a fuck about your approval or not, I'd come and ask you.

  116. Legislators then SHOULD wear them! by arisvega · · Score: 1

    So you know who their sponsor is- after all, they DO have sponsors, don't they!

    --
    The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
  117. Programmable plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am surprised that no one commented on the part about being able to show things like Amber Alerts and such. This means that the plates would be controllable from some central government site.
    It means that there would likely be some way to locate the position of any vehicle.
    How much will it cost to repair the damages caused by hacking my vehicle's plates?
    How much will it cost to re-wire a vehicle so it can be licensed?
    It would not surprise me if it would, eventually, be capable of turning a car off since it must be getting the power to run it from somewhere and would be wired into the car...

  118. Terror for Terra by WNight · · Score: 1

    We must either respect their sovereignty, or pay the consequences.

    Snort. As long as they respect the sovereignty of their people.

    Anything else is exactly equivalent to a terrorist demanding we leave them alone because they've got "enough" hostages.

    And you wonder why the rest of the world hates the US for our attitude with regard to bullying other countries and pushing our brand of freedom on them.

    And yet the USA has never tried to do anything I'd recommend...

    What would you say if China decided to 'enlighten' our population by "...roll[ing] RED Chinese trucks through the streets of every city in the world and "offer" to relocate anyone..."?

    They could, it's (mostly) legal here. It's a matter of making an offer to people and letting them choose.

    We might make a fuss if they were to try taking prisoners but we'd be in the wrong. (The point of prison largely being protection of the innocent - if the prisoner was gone we'd still be safe.) Ditto children - if the child can express meaningful intent.

    It's in countries that require exit visas where there'd be a real fuss. They think they own the people.

    Using or threatening to use force to bring about political change is the definition of terrorism, you know.

    Tell that to the government when they come to arrest me for not wearing pants. Or are you seriously against the police?

    Also, force is fine where appropriate. To a bully, someone who by definition abuses others, it's always fine. If they didn't want to accept force they wouldn't use it on others.

    I think you'll find that wielding terror is the definition of a terrorist. A single clear threat to kill a dictator, one easily avoidable by stepping down, is pretty much the definition of reasonable use of force.

    If you, as a country, have exhausted all peaceful means, then maybe we can help.

    Well I think they did exhaust legal means. The state militia started shooting innocent protestors and even killing bystanders like Neda. And to show these weren't one-off accidents it then clamped down ridiculously such as forbidding Neda's family from holding a funeral because of the bad press.

    If your government is horribly repressive, we'll take you in as a refugee.

    Oh great. If your state is HORRIBLE we'll let you try to escape and cross the world on your own and, then probably turn you back anyways.

    But invading to force peace and freedom is a bit of a contradiction, IMHO.

    Sure is. The fiasco in Iraq is the reason the Iranians would be daft to trust the USA. But Canada, before we squandered our world trust by going into Afghanistan, would have been perfect for this.

    But a threat to shoot a terrorist in mid-terror - if that was also terror our SWAT teams would be illegal...