Slashdot Mirror


Chinese iPad Factory Staff Forced To Sign 'No Suicide' Pledge

An anonymous reader writes "Employees at Foxconn facilities in China, used to manufacture the iPhone and iPad, were forced to sign a pledge not to commit suicide after over a dozen staff killed themselves over the last 16 months. The revelation is the latest in a series of findings about the treatment of workers at Foxconn plants, where staff often work six 12-hour shifts a week, 98 hours of overtime in a month, and live in dormitories that look and feel like prison blocks."

359 of 537 comments (clear)

  1. Pffft by proverbialcow · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Good luck enforcing it.

    --
    The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
    1. Re:Pffft by mrxak · · Score: 5, Informative

      FTFA: "And they were made to promise that if they did, their families would only seek the legal minimum in damages."

      So, there is some form of enforcement after all. The legality of this, I couldn't say.

    2. Re:Pffft by proverbialcow · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If they were forced to sign it, then it was signed under duress and it's not enforceable. :)

      In America that's true, but I have my doubts about China.

      --
      The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
    3. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The legality of this, I couldn't say.

      I'm sure China doesn't give a fuck. If they did, requiring an employee to work 70 hours a week for $10 a day and share living space with two dozen other employees wouldn't be legal in the first place.

    4. Re:Pffft by proverbialcow · · Score: 1

      Have you read Kevin J. Anderson's "Noir" by any chance?

      --
      The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
    5. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't there be a privity of contract issue here? Surely you can't create an obligation for person C in an agreement between A and B.

    6. Re:Pffft by proverbialcow · · Score: 1

      K. W. Jeter, not Anderson. My bad.

      --
      The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
    7. Re:Pffft by icebike · · Score: 2

      Story about China. Did you miss that?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    8. Re:Pffft by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      If they were smart, they would destroy large amounts of expensive equipment on their way out. That would change things very quickly. Just offing themselves is only embarrassing.

      And of course this assumes they can't get a job somewhere else (because that would be the truly smart thing to do).

      This entire thing makes me a little embarrassed to use an Iphone tho it is required by work. But it says that Apple is fairly evil. This should have been resolved before anyone died.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    9. Re:Pffft by Samalie · · Score: 1

      Apple is evil, Dell is evil, Google is evil, Microsoft is evil....

      They're all bastards really...not one of them care one lick outside of keeping their shareholders happy. And all that keeps the shareholders happy is profit & a rising stock price.

      Nobody in the business world gives one shit about any of the pleebs...they're just resources to get the job done to make money to keep the shareholders happy.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    10. Re:Pffft by vlm · · Score: 4, Insightful

      FTFA: "And they were made to promise that if they did, their families would only seek the legal minimum in damages."

      So, there is some form of enforcement after all. The legality of this, I couldn't say.

      I don't think I'm violating a NDA here, because this is a "well known" liability limiting move.

      So anyone killed by, say, an overhead crane dropping a pallet on their heads, can be ruled a suicide, and they promise their family only gets legal minimum in damages. I'm only slightly tongue in cheek with the crane example, as the company would rule the victim should have been looking up, only a suicidal person would not run away as the pallet falls on them, etc. Pretty much anything other than blatant 1st deg murder with numerous witnesses would qualify.

      How much legal weight something like this holds is mysterious. If it intimidates just one victims family, it certainly pays for the cost of paperwork.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    11. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's funny, you think China cares about the legality of something. Their economy is being built upon the broken backs of workers just like those at Foxconn. As the "pledge" indicates, the only worker they don't want is a dead worker, because they can't squeeze every last dime and ounce of life out of someone they've already finished.

    12. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The suicide rate at Foxconn is lower than in China in general. In fact, it is lower than in Italy, which has the lowest rate in Europe. As we all know, Europe is best at everything.

      These Foxconn stories are pure propaganda. I go out of my way to buy electronics made there.

    13. Re:Pffft by mrxak · · Score: 2

      The reason workers choose to work at Foxconn is precisely because it is better to work for them than to not have a job at all, or even work for another company. As much as we might talk about China being communist, this situation is entirely about capitalism. The worker's labor is worth precisely how much he or she is being paid, and the work conditions they must suffer through, otherwise Foxconn would have to better the wage and conditions to attract workers. Now, perhaps China as a whole isn't the greatest place to be, that a company like Foxconn is seen as an improvement, but that's a larger issue that ultimately will only be fixed by using China for cheap labor more and more until their employment levels and living conditions rise to western standards. As miserable as the work may be at times for these workers, it sure beats starving to death, or people would choose to starve.

    14. Re:Pffft by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      The legality of this, I couldn't say.

      "I'll make it legal"...

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    15. Re:Pffft by mrxak · · Score: 1

      In large international corporations did not employ people in places like China, things would be far worse off for people like the Chinese. A job is better than no job.

      If you want to improve conditions in China, you have to give the Chinese money. Clearly working at Foxconn, for the wages and conditions offered, is considered pretty good, or Foxconn wouldn't have any employees. They may be forced into it by circumstance (not wanting to starve to death), but nobody held a gun to their head.

      Americans commit suicide too, FYI.

    16. Re:Pffft by Dogtanian · · Score: 1
      Disclaimer; IANACLANAYIS (I am not a Chinese lawyer... and neither are you, I suspect!)

      So I get to sign contracts that put conditions on my family in China? sweeet.

      Well, you can't say for sure- this is your interpretation of the article's interpretation and (possibly casual) paraphrasing of the original contract. It's equally- if not more- likely that it was actually expressed as something like (e.g.) a bomb-disposal expert's contract including a condition acknowledging the high risk of the job and limiting damages able to be obtained *on their behalf* as a result of their death.

      It's only putting conditions on the family in their (voluntary) capacity as agents acting on the behalf of the deceased.

      Course, even if this *is* the case, one may argue that while such a clause would be legitimate and understandable for the bomb disposal expert, the "no suicide" clause- even if expressed in that way- is more obviously abusive and less justified.

      BTW, heard this story- or something similar- before, when the last lot of Apple-leak-suicides were happening, and the same reason was given for the (superficially) silly inclusion of the "no suicide" clause. Not as daft as it sounds.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    17. Re:Pffft by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      When you get evicted from your house, your son is going to have to go too. Come to think of it where does it say that he's allowed to live in that house? The mortgage/rental agreement is in your name, not his.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    18. Re:Pffft by shadowrat · · Score: 2
      It says Foxconn is fairly evil. These aren't Apple plants. I'm not saying apple is a saint, but TFA doesn't say that Apple requested these conditions. It just draws some correlations to Apple by mentioning that these plants make stuff for them.

      During peak periods of demand for the iPad, workers were made to take only one day off in 13.

      To me that says the owners of Foxconn promised Apple a certain number of iPads and probably promised their other clients stuff and they made sure their people made that stuff damnit. It also seems pretty clear that the factories are the ones forcing people to sign these agreements, not Apple.

      AFIK Apple continues to deal with these people, so that's damning, but the article never says that Apple is making these decisions.

    19. Re:Pffft by camperslo · · Score: 3, Funny

      If they were forced to sign it, then it was signed under duress and it's not enforceable. :)

      Since you've found the loophole, the anti-suicide provisions don't apply to you. We're pleased to inform you that you've been transferred to the energy services division which will be happy to schedule your suicide. We think you have a bright future in biofuel.

    20. Re:Pffft by mabhatter654 · · Score: 5, Informative

      they didn't "have" to sign it.... just like you don't "have" to have a job that decides they don't want you to smoke ... at all. They're more than free to get another job. There's only 1.3 BILLION other people competing! In many ways the US labor rules are at the far end of the "civilized" countries when it comes to what we allow "by the books".

      I don't see what's wrong with the 12 hours, 6 days. During peak auto season most UAW workers work those kind of hours... sometimes even 7 days. I work at a steel company and guys in the mills do that all the time. Many, many jobs in the USA work those kind of hours... in fact it's the norm... nursing, steel mills, auto makers, cops. That's in the USA with Union jobs, what's the big deal. The only real difference in the USA that these people have nice houses with big mortgages and drive 45 minutes each way to work. Oh, and after working all those hours your cut-rate health insurance blames "your lifestyle" on all the health problems you have, not to mention the huge divorce rate in those jobs.

      Realize when you hear nurses or steel workers get those big paychecks they really are SAVING their companies tons of money. Companies in the US should be hiring 1/3 more workers in a lot of cases.. but having existing workers work 1/2 more comes out cheaper because "fixed costs" per employee (Health, workman's comp, vacation, etc) all are based on a 40 hour week. Sure they get time and a half, or even double time... and how much is just health insurance rising? weigh that against consistently working massive overtime and even the spikes in insurance costs are trivial to what the company is making per employee. Don't believe a word of the "US Unions are ruining things".... remember non-union tech employees got "reclassified" so WE can work those kinds of hours for "salary"...

      Don't see what all the outrage is because it happens in China... the only reason so much work goes there is that their hourly wage is less... and their countries have national health insurance so the companies don't have to pay it. By the time they get employees that can work like Americans though, they are getting close to paying the same kind of money once language and shipping come into account.

    21. Re:Pffft by syousef · · Score: 1

      I see this drivel all the time. Of course it's better to do harsh work than starve, but the option to do harsh work only exists because companies are not forced to provide better conditions and the population is so large that there is always someone willing to work under horrible conditions rather than starve. The only answer is to force companies to provide better minimum conditions. Developing countries can develop all they want but if the supply of workers is always larger than demand, left to their own devices, a countries working and living standards won't improve no matter how well the country does. Pure capitalism can't fix every problem any more than any other ideal. Some regulation is needed.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    22. Re:Pffft by hey+hey+hey · · Score: 2

      Come to think of it where does it say that he's allowed to live in that house? The mortgage/rental agreement is in your name, not his.

      The rental agreements that I use have a section that describes the rights of minors to live in the space (and they are listed by name). If they are not minors, they are required to sign the lease (you are not allowed to have guest for longer than 2 weeks without permission, no matter their relationship to you).

    23. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not China, business. Used to be like this in the United States of America too, has nothing to do with the Government. Things became better in the US not because of the government, but because of Union organization and dollars and cents.

      Same thing will happen in China as the US falls apart and becomes France but without the social safety net by the end of the 21st Century. Good times!

    24. Re:Pffft by mrxak · · Score: 1

      These sort of work conditions and wage levels seemed to have worked pretty well in the United States, and every other industrialized nation. There's no shortcuts here.

      The fact is, there are more people than there are jobs. You can't magically create new jobs with huge salaries and pensions and whatever else out of thin air. There's only so much demand for iPads and other electronics in the world. If demand was higher, Foxconn or other companies would have to hire more people, which would drive down unemployment, which would force Foxconn and other companies to raise their wages and conditions to attract enough workers for the task.

      Forcing these companies to do better will only mean these companies go out of business, when somebody sets up shop next door and offers cheaper labor to the companies that need cheap labor. As much as you might wish that we can somehow raise these third-world workers to the standard of living we enjoy in the United States or wherever else they buy iPads, but as soon as that happens, Apple will start making the iPad in the United States to cut logistics costs, and the iPad will cost more than anybody is willing to pay to own one. That means no jobs for anybody.

      Economics is not some magical wishing well. It works, perhaps slower than we might like, to raise standard of living for everybody everywhere. It does so in very predictable, repeatable ways, and the structures are really not as hard to understand as some slashdot commentators seem to think.

      Ultimately a job is better than no job, and efforts to curtail the efficiency of capitalism with "regulation" only results in the reduction of the number of people who have jobs, because there's a fixed amount of money set aside for the labor required, by very simple market forces. An iPad is worth precisely how much it costs. Inflating the price artificially will reduce the demand for the product, which reduces the number of jobs it creates to meet the demand. It's all very simple math, and while this math may not appeal to an idealist, it has the advantage of living in reality.

    25. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      With all due respect, the function of a corporation is to 'increase shareholder value'.... not to take care of employees/customers/contractors/governments/environment/etc.

      How they do that is where things get sticky. Hire some employees (or sub-contract). Design and build a product or service. Protect that product or service so that others can't immediately profit from your ideas and efforts. Sell that product at a balanced price-point so that a sufficient number of consumers want and are able to purchase your product while returning the most revenue for you.

      Somewhere in there is the idea of social responsibility. Should corporations treat employees well? Of course. Should corporations help protect the environment? Yes. Should corporations make sure that their supply chain is following these same tenets? I think so. Where is the line drawn? Who decides what is 'enough'? What is 'too much'? Implementing these policies involves a delicate balancing act between what is good for the employees/environment/etc., keeping the price points sufficiently low so that consumers can still afford to buy your product, and maximizing shareholder value. An ideal company that ensures every person in the supply chain is well cared for, makes only the best decisions about the environments, but produces products that are so expensive that only a few people can afford them won't stay in business for long.

      Is it good that Apple (or anyone else) outsources production to a company whose policies are so evil that employees commit suicide over the working conditions? No. However, it's *is* Apple's responsibility to get the best price from their providers.

      I would personally like to see working conditions improve for these people. Lest we forget, just because they are Chinese, these are PEOPLE we are talking about. They have mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers, husbands, wives, children, hopes and dreams. It is ridiculous that they have so few choices that this work is the best they can do.

      Would you be willing to pay $100 more for an electronic gizmo in order to have it built by a reputable company that 'cares' more? You might. I might. Would everyone? Absolutely not. If they would, then WalMart wouldn't be one of the biggest retail chains. People care about what is good for them, and that means low prices. Period. You do it every time you go shopping. So do I. Why should a corporation be any different.

    26. Re:Pffft by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Err, one small bit:

      If China ever did start regulating for safety and health at anywhere near the benefits of American workers (let alone European, which is higher), the computer you buy to replace your current one will cost you (in parts or in whole) roughly 600% more, not counting shipping.

      That, or the big boys in tech will simply move their operations to South America, Africa, Eastern Europe...

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    27. Re:Pffft by cusco · · Score: 1

      Of course Apple didn't REQUEST those conditions, but they certainly know about them and since they aren't telling Foxconn to clean up their act that implicitly means that they approve.

      You didn't REQUEST that BP dump a gazillion liters of crude in the ocean, but if you continue to buy gas at Arco that implies that you don't disapprove of their action. (Unless you didn't know that they own Arco, but now you do.)

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    28. Re:Pffft by theArtificial · · Score: 1

      Apple is evil, Dell is evil, Google is evil, Microsoft is evil....

      To a degree, but wouldn't it be more appropriate to say people are evil? Many people continue buy Nikes, Levis, and electronics that are produced by "evil companies". Life isn't so black and white, good and evil. It would really make things simple to see "Now with more Slavery" next to the Underwriters Labratories logo but who is more evil though? The company filling a demand at market prices, or countries lacking strong worker protection enabling situations like this, or people who support/reward "evil companies" by purchasing their goods etc.? The way this is phrased it could imply that people are good until they form companies. The same companies which sell goods and services to others at the prices they want (yes, even Apple!). Ultimately it comes down to voting with your wallet.

      Nobody in the business world gives one shit about any of the pleebs...

      I don't think this is something the average man is concerned with either (based on spending habits). Many people are pragmatic but if the non business world is so people centric wouldn't there be a focus on buying domestic? For many the biggest motivation in a purchase decision is the price. Look at the current trend with new games retailing at lower prices (especially on mobile platforms). Steam sales provide another great sample of buying habits with their mid week and weekend sales. On sale titles have moved more units during a "holiday" sale than when the game originally came out.

      they're just resources to get the job done to make money to keep the shareholders happy.

      I don't disagree with you but think about this: When you are employed do you do what is expected of you? Or do you perform poorly and/or not cover what you're being paid to do? For example if you're in sales and you don't sell, don't be shocked if you're out a job. It's business. One of the easiest ways to secure a position besides being a rockstar with your work is to be liked by your boss (voting shareholders). In the real world what shareholder would want a company making decisions that aren't in it's best interests?

      --
      Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
    29. Re:Pffft by theArtificial · · Score: 1

      The reason workers choose to work at Foxconn is precisely because it is better to work for them than to not have a job at all, or even work for another company.

      I'm not sure about all of the options avialable to workers perhaps part of the appeal is that life in the city is perceived superior to what one finds on a farm? I've done my share of outdoor labor and for the most part I'll choose indoor when provided with a choice (especially in the South West).

      The worker's labor is worth precisely how much he or she is being paid, and the work conditions they must suffer through, otherwise Foxconn would have to better the wage and conditions to attract workers. Now, perhaps China as a whole isn't the greatest place to be, that a company like Foxconn is seen as an improvement, but that's a larger issue that ultimately will only be fixed by using China for cheap labor more and more until their employment levels and living conditions rise to western standards. As miserable as the work may be at times for these workers, it sure beats starving to death, or people would choose to starve.

      To add to this, not too long ago there were similar conditions in parts of America. China is going through an Industrial Revolution and there are always growing pains.

      --
      Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
    30. Re:Pffft by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      think about this the next time someone 'stands up for capitalism'.

      capitalism is BAD. most other systems suck, but why have we given up searching for a better system?

      the idea of handing all the money to the rich and letting them drizzle some down on us (...) is not working. never worked, in fact. letting the rich and powerful control things was a mistake. giving companies all the power and no ethics was a mistake.

      "a company only wants to make more money".

      I'm sorry, but we did this ALL WRONG. first step is to admit it. we are not even at the first step of repair, then ;(

      corporations are people, these days; they should face the same pains as people, too. even death penalty if the company has been a very very bad boy. and arrests for corporate leaders who take companies down unethical paths.

      enough is enough, already! the rich and powerful DO NOT CARE about life and limb.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    31. Re:Pffft by bckrispi · · Score: 1

      They may be forced into it by circumstance (not wanting to starve to death), but nobody held a gun to their head.

      That's the stupidest thing I've heard since stupid came to stupidtown. Starvation will kill you just as dead as a bullet, only it's longer, more painful, and more emotionally traumatizing. I find no end of irony in the fact that the Libertarian Paradise you keep gushing over is smack dab in the middle of Communist China. This has nothing to do with free markets. This is one short step above slavery.

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    32. Re:Pffft by cdrguru · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why wouldn't it be legal? After all, it is about 1000 times better than folks living on the factory farms have it where it is 12 hours of work for a handful of rice.

      The rural folks in China have it really, really bad and they are even more motivated to move to the city than the folks in Mexico are to come to the US. After all, in Mexico you might get $2 for a day's work and have your own shack. People are quite willing to cross the desert with signs that pretty much say "If you continue you will die" because they can make $50 a day and feed their entire family on one person's wages.

      In China a little thing like suicide isn't going to deter them in the slightest. I suspect as long as they aren't hit by falling bodies they are perfectly OK with a 1% chance they might really want to commit suicide if they take a crappy job.

    33. Re:Pffft by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that the average Chinese person is perfectly happy with awful working conditions because these conditions are 1000 times better than the farm they escaped from.

      And when this person trudges to their stool for their day's work right there behind them outside the gate there are 2500 people waiting to be allowed in when someone dies and a position becomes available. Since they left the farm and there are no other jobs all they can do is wait outside the factories hoping there will be an opening and they will get it. After all, the odds of 1 in 2500 aren't that bad, are they?

      This has little to do with capitalism and a lot to do with a country that is incapable of managing any sort of growth.

    34. Re:Pffft by parlancex · · Score: 1

      Not to say their working conditions aren't horrible, but I very much dislike how fashionable it is become to cite raw wages like that out of context. Are they paid poorly? Yes, very much so. Is the standard of living on $10 a day in China the same as it is in America? Absolutely not.

    35. Re:Pffft by reub2000 · · Score: 1

      This entire thing makes me a little embarrassed to use an Iphone tho it is required by work.

      What in makes you think that other companies are any better in this regard? Apple isn't the only company that contracts with foxconn you know.

      That said, the apple pr department should be ashamed for not having a better response.

    36. Re:Pffft by sexconker · · Score: 1

      I don't see what's wrong with the 12 hours, 6 days. During peak auto season most UAW workers work those kind of hours... sometimes even 7 days.

      You forgot to put "work" in quotation marks.
      UAW workers are the laziest group of people on the planet, and they're like that because they know they won't get fired. To the contrary, if they're behind schedule, everyone who wants it gets overtime. They get overtime and double overtime to do the work they should have done during their scheduled shift.

      The UAW is the anchor around the American automotive industry's neck.

    37. Re:Pffft by sexconker · · Score: 1

      The suicide rate at Foxconn is lower than in China in general. In fact, it is lower than in Italy, which has the lowest rate in Europe. As we all know, Europe is best at everything.

      These Foxconn stories are pure propaganda. I go out of my way to buy electronics made there.

      No isn't, you fucking idiot. The rate among Foxconn employees is over triple the rate among the populace as a whole. The only way your statement can be construed as true is if you look at the hokum floated by Foxconn/Apple every few months and don't realize that they're only counting suicides AT WORK as Foxconn suicides, so an employee who kills himself on the street or at home (even when it's his Foxxcon Employee Housing Compartment), it's counted as a non Foxconn suicide.

      Dentists are one of the worst groups for suicide rates. Most of them don't off themselves in the office. But we still recognize and pay attention to the correlation because guess what, correlation usually fucking does imply causation.

    38. Re:Pffft by Moryath · · Score: 1
    39. Re:Pffft by Moryath · · Score: 1

      Ever been to a UAW plant?

      Ever seen them in action?

      I have and you're full of shit.

    40. Re:Pffft by Lord_Jeremy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Many things are made by Foxconn. Also from what I've read, their suicide rate is quite a bit lower than the average suicide rates in Chinese/Taiwanese manufacturing plants. We only hear/care about this one because they make i-devices. I mean come on, the very title of this summary should be a glaring indicator why anyone cares. Foxconn is not a "chinese iPad factory," its a massive global technology company manufacturing pipeline.

    41. Re:Pffft by Isaac+Remuant · · Score: 2

      While I understand the sentiment, I wonder how much chinese technology you are bound to encounter in all the technological gadgets you own. Be it Computers, phones or whatever. Can you vouch for the working conditions of the workers in each case?

      What about clothing?

      In my case. I'm 99% ignorant and am forced to take price-quality relation as practically the unique factor of a purchase.

      Fyi, third world, s40 phone (posting from it).

      --
      "Science can amuse and fascinate us all, but it is engineering that changes the world. " - Asimov.
    42. Re:Pffft by Requiem18th · · Score: 1

      I'd say capitalism is incapable of managing any sort of growth, except by offing the surplus population, if you find that acceptable.

      --
      But... the future refused to change.
    43. Re:Pffft by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 1

      I know quite a few retired UAW workers from detroit,,, entire family lines of UAW workers.

      And you know what they like to talk about? How they sit around doing coke/heroin at work and couldn't get fired for it, the most that would happen is a forced rehab.. they would talk about doing the rehab stint and be right back to slinging tar on the assembly line...

      I've heard some crazy ass stories about UAW workers, it wouldn't supprise me to find a lot of contempt held for them from hard-working individuals who get bitched at for smoking a cig at work.

      --
      Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
    44. Re:Pffft by geckipede · · Score: 1

      Providing jobs does not grant a licence to do evil.

      Low wages is not the issue here. if the Foxconn workers were just getting crap pay, I suspect nobody here would care, but what is happening is that they are getting crap pay in combination with being treated like robots. The workers are being forced to stand all day in silence, permitted enough time off to eat and sleep but not enough time off to look for alternative employment, and on top of all that then being told "if you kill yourself, we will fight to the very last to avoid admitting fault and having to give compensation to your family"

      If a country's economy really can't support high wages, then fine, low wages will be acceptable. The same applies to things like cheap and awful company dormitories, but harassment and dehumanising policies should not be part of the deal. If competition for jobs is harsh enough that employers start being able to pointlessly abuse their emploees just because they have no choice, then yes, the law should be there to protect them. Economic arguments cannot be used to defend something like a forced no-suicide agreement.

    45. Re:Pffft by reub2000 · · Score: 1

      My motorola phone says made in china, the blanket I have wrapped around me says made in china, and my jeans say made in pakistan. I'm just cynical. And as a million other comments on this article say, your solution won't result in the outcome that you desire.

    46. Re:Pffft by Lord_Jeremy · · Score: 2

      Actually, they are telling Foxconn to clean up their act - reference

      For what it's worth, from what I've read a big motivation in these suicides is accident compensation for families or somesuch. That's more a product of society in general. Both theirs and ours.

    47. Re:Pffft by JDevers · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for most professions, but I'm currently a nurse. If I WANTED to I could probably work 16 out of every 24 hours every day of the week. I choose not to and only occasionally take extra shifts. I have a wife and family and, while I enjoy my job, my family comes first. On the other hand, when I was in college I worked at a nuclear power plant for a summer doing labor during an outage. I worked for 58 days straight 12-14 hours a day. My base pay was only $12.50 an hour but the overtime on those checks was substantial. I also busted my ass, sometimes running a chipping hammer for 12 hours every day for several straight days in the open Southern sun of June, July, and August. Sometimes I laid grout inside of the reactor wearing like 10 layers of clothing in 120 degree heat for half the shift and spent the other half "rehydrating" and trying not to fall asleep.

      It was worth it. I'm glad I did it, it allowed me to have substantially more money in my bank account than my friends who were working as health care aides or in restaurants. At the end of that summer I also had a hell of a body and a great tan. I also have some fun stories to tell. But to think that in China people are doing the same thing or worse and barely getting enough money to feed themselves sucks.

    48. Re:Pffft by jrumney · · Score: 2

      Given that the going rate in Southern China for electronics factory work is about $6 per day, the company dorm is probably more comfortable than the rural shack they were raised in, and these people are away from home in an area where they have no social connections outside work with the objective to save as much money in as short a time as possible so they can go back to their village and improve the life of their family, I don't think your idea of legality would be particularly welcome there.

    49. Re:Pffft by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      Why wouldn't it be legal?

      I apologize for being Captain Obvious here, but it's not legal because it's illegal - which is to say, Chinese law mandates 40-hour day, and all businesses officially comply.

    50. Re:Pffft by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2

      This entire thing makes me a little embarrassed to use an Iphone tho it is required by work.

      What in makes you think that other companies are any better in this regard? Apple isn't the only company that contracts with foxconn you know. That said, the apple pr department should be ashamed for not having a better response.

      Apple is probably the best in the industry for working conditions in China and they do publicize that. Newspapers, however, don't care because Apple's popularity makes demonizing them sell more papers, even if it's doing so by misinformation. Apple audits their suppliers, publishes the audits openly and actually takes corrective measures. They dropped a number of suppliers because of poor working conditions, too long of hours, or child labor. They forced others to change policies and provide compensation to workers in order to keep their business. Basically no other company in the industry does this. Daily Mail should be ashamed of the way they spin Foxconn as an "Apple supplier" without mentioning all the other companies like Intel, Nokia, HP, Acer, etc. and not bothering to find out if the plants they are complaining about are the ones Apple audited and required changes at, or service some other company entirely. And they can't even plead ignorance because they mention Apple's audits as one of their sources.

    51. Re:Pffft by cusco · · Score: 1

      Well, I'll be damned. The first thing that I've ever seen from Apple that I actually approve of. We'll see if it produces anything real, or if it's just greenwashing.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    52. Re:Pffft by cavreader · · Score: 1

      Yea whats the penalty for breaking this rule? It's like how the US actually declare suicide against the law. Why pass a law that when broken has no chance of ever being adjudicated.

    53. Re:Pffft by shentino · · Score: 1

      It depends what you mean by force.

      If it was signed at gunpoint, or by threats to the safety of family, you bet.

      "Sign this or you don't get to work here", not so much.

    54. Re:Pffft by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Which, you should note, is intended to stop people from cramming 20 people into a 2 bedroom apartment - not to punish "normal" people/families.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    55. Re:Pffft by bronney · · Score: 1

      you mean 40 hour week? If not you sound quite timecube.com

    56. Re:Pffft by number11 · · Score: 1

      Chinese law mandates 40-hour day, and all businesses officially comply.

      Very few Chinese businesses (outside of the prison labor) actually succeed in getting 40 hours work per employee per day. But it's like in the old USSR, "we pretend to work, and they pretend to pay us".

    57. Re:Pffft by number11 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Please stop your silly neo-Marxist comments. The only reason those workers put up with $10 daily and those dorms is simply because their other alternatives stink even more.

      My mistake. They are clearly living in a capitalist paradise.

    58. Re:Pffft by DocHoncho · · Score: 1

      Why do you hate America?!

      --
      Celebrity worship is a poor substitute for Deity worship and costs more to boot.
    59. Re:Pffft by voridor · · Score: 1

      There will always be rich people and always be poor people. It is human nature, some people seek money, fame, and power. Those people will inevitably work harder and have a good chance of reaching their goals (some systems make this harder than others, but it is always a possibility). For the ambitious a power grab is even easier when you factor in a lot of people don't like to make tough decisions or simply aren't confident in themselves, so they would rather give that power to someone else whom they can blame later.

      The only way you could ever change this is to fundamentally change human nature so that everyone has equal work ethics and attitude towards life. This simply won't happen. There will always be lazy people, dishonest people, greedy people, hard workers, and, well, jerks.

      I like my job, I work hard at it, so I get paid well. I don't see what is so horrible about a system that allows me to pursue my career and get paid well for it. If that makes me a "capitalist pig", then so be it :-)

      I do feel there shouldn't be corporate bail-outs and the way Foxconn treats their employees is horrible, but that cannot be laid solely at the feet of capitalism. After all, capitalism is an economic system and can be coupled with many different political systems, some political systems combined with capitalism can be a very bad combination.

    60. Re:Pffft by lgw · · Score: 1

      You can't magically create new jobs with huge salaries and pensions and whatever else out of thin air. ... Economics is not some magical wishing well.

      You, sir, have no future in politics.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    61. Re:Pffft by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      Bingo. That's the irony of these types of comments where people want to shut down these companies......they're much better than the average job and the people earn more than the average person. The people complaining only look at it from the view of "This is how I think things should be and anything else is evil" instead "While things could definitely be better, these jobs are much better than what the average person has, so they're still better off having this job than working on a farm for cents a day".

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    62. Re:Pffft by mrxak · · Score: 1

      If the so-called harassment and dehumanizing policies are as big a deal as you make them out to be, then Foxconn would have trouble attracting employees. That's clearly not the case. Clearly you would be unwilling to sign an agreement not to kill yourself. So be it, don't work for Foxconn. Foxconn employees apparently don't mind. Considering just how many workers they have there, and how few have ever killed themselves, I don't think it's that big a deal.

      This is only a news story because they build popular electronics there, so people want to make a big deal out of it. Is it a little strange? Yeah. But if my employer wanted me to sign a piece of paper promising to not do myself harm, I wouldn't mind one bit. I have no intention to off myself, and it would seem the vast, vast majority of Foxconn employees feel the same way. Most people everywhere feel that way. A pledge to that effect isn't doing anybody harm except those who wish themselves harm. I think Foxconn has every reason to not want their employees to kill themselves, as would any company. I think if somebody did refuse to sign, that would be an indication they are mentally disturbed. That's probably a reasonable thing to screen for in your employees anyway, as they might do more than just harm themselves. I'm not so naive as to expect Foxconn is doing this merely as a public service for their employees, and are instead looking out for their bottom line, but nonetheless, they have every right to do so. This protects themselves from unstable individuals, or those who are looking to become employees for a week just so they can kill themselves so their families can sue. Foxconn wants dedicated, emotionally stable workers.

      You seem to be perfectly fine with low wages and crappy dormitories, so ultimately you just have a problem with people not being allowed to kill themselves on business property and have their families get a big payday. This isn't so much different than the stipulations in life insurance policies where the family gets nothing if the policy-holder commits suicide. This contract may very well save lives.

    63. Re:Pffft by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 2

      I own 50% of my company. We have a few employees that work between 8 and 10 hours a day, and some other part time (4 to 6 hours).

      My associate and I get to the office at 8 A.M, and stay there until midnight most days, we work Monday through Saturday, but we also answer our phones and get some telecommute hours on Sundays. We rarely take any holidays off, and since there is no god, we even work on christmas. Last year, I only took 6 days of vacations.

      We work harder than any of our employees, and we like it that way. We enjoy what we do (we code), and come in to the office every day with a huge smile. I'm single, so it's easier for me. My associate is married, 2 children, and he still manages to put in almost as many hours as I do.

      Dedication to what you do is a great thing, and working hard shouldn't drive anyone to suicide. It's the other half of the problem that drives this people to kill themselves. It's having a life with no purpose other than to serve your capitalist overlords.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    64. Re:Pffft by mrxak · · Score: 1

      China is anything but communist, these days. This is entirely free markets, and good thing because their lives are improved by the free market. These workers aren't forced to do anything.

      A slave works because they have no choice, and they are rather miserable about it. Their job may or may not suck, but they can't quit. They are motivated by fear alone.

      These people know their jobs kind of suck, but they're very happy to have them. What's more, they are keenly aware that if they work hard now, their children and their children's children will be much better off. They are highly motivated by economic forces.

      In other words, working this job, voluntarily, gives them a way to advance their lives, rather than them being forced to stay in one condition forever.

      Starvation will kill you just as dead, I agree. But does that make every employee everywhere a slave? After all, if you don't work in your cushy western job, you'll starve too.

      These people are living significantly better than many other Chinese, and they know it. The fact you're unwilling to work for their wage and live in their condition just goes to show you how spoiled you are, and exactly why a company like Foxconn doesn't exist in the west. If American workers were willing to lower their quality of life for a job, we'd have 0% unemployment, and nobody could afford any iPads. Instead, we're used to a much higher standard of living, so we give all our crappy manufacturing jobs overseas and they're happy for it.

    65. Re:Pffft by cavreader · · Score: 1

      Under paying the workers to helps maintain cheaper exports which the Chinese depend on. It's the cost that allows them to attract more customers because they sure as hell don't rely on quality. Countries outsource to China because it is cheaper than using domestic workers.

    66. Re:Pffft by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      Apple is evil, Dell is evil, Google is evil, Microsoft is evil....
      They're all bastards really...not one of them care one lick outside of keeping their shareholders happy. And all that keeps the shareholders happy is profit & a rising stock price.
      Nobody in the business world gives one shit about any of the pleebs...they're just resources to get the job done to make money to keep the shareholders happy.

      "You're about to be told one more time that you're America's most valuable natural resource. Have you seen what they do to valuable natural resources?
      Have you seen them strip mine? Have you seen a clear-cut in a forest? Have you seen a polluted river? Don't ever let them call you a valuable natural resource! They're gonna strip mine your soul! They're gonna clear-cut your best thoughts for the sake of profit, unless you learn to resist, cause the profit system follows the path of least resistance, and following the path of least resistance is what makes the river crooked! Hmph!"
      - Utah Phillips

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    67. Re:Pffft by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

      Hear hear - but everyone, not only the news, has been doing that since as long as I remember. There are some perfectly stable-economy (and beautiful) places on this earth where one can live one year on one month of his 'first world' (hate that term) salary.

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
    68. Re:Pffft by Omniscientist · · Score: 1

      I have a similar story and situation and I couldn't agree more. No work on Christmas however; have to give the family face time every now and then.

    69. Re:Pffft by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      'first world' (hate that term)

      Thats because the terms of reference are Old world, new world, and third world

      The Old World - That which was known to the Romans in about the time of Christ.

      New World - stuff that was discovered at about the time of Columbus.

      Thrid world - the rest.

      These terms were not originally about wealth/poverty, but about history. They got hijacked by the "aid" profession on the 1980's.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    70. Re:Pffft by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      My associate is married, 2 children, and he still manages to put in almost as many hours as I do.

      The question is, of course, how long will he stay married if he spends that little time with his family.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    71. Re:Pffft by Artifex · · Score: 1

      It has been discussed elsewhere that their suicide rate is actually less than their normal population, not just among industrial workers.
      But that's not sensational reporting.

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    72. Re:Pffft by Gumbercules!! · · Score: 1

      I am where you're going to be in a few years. This life was fine in the past but now I have a wife and two children under 3, one of whom is still a little baby. I get home from work with a tonne of work to do, so my wife has to carry addition burdens with the kids, etc. It's not as great as it used to be, I can tell you.

      The only saving grace is I never, ever work on a Saturday, so at least we have 1 day a week of family time.

      The problem you're going to find is that a young family is like 3 full time jobs and running your own business is like 3 full time jobs. There's not enough time for both and there's no way to juggle it.

      Build your business as fast as you can because when you get to the family stage of life, you're going to need to hand some of that work over, whether you want to or not.

    73. Re:Pffft by Altanar · · Score: 1

      But how would you pretend to work at Foxconn where they have a production quota?

    74. Re:Pffft by Altanar · · Score: 1

      They could be paid $500/week, but that still wouldn't make up for the fact that they're forced to work 70 hour work weeks.

    75. Re:Pffft by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      It has been discussed elsewhere that their suicide rate is actually less than their normal population, not just among industrial workers.

      It has been discussed elsewhere that their suicide rate is actually considerably less than the suicide rate in the total population of the USA.

    76. Re:Pffft by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      China tried Marxism already. Didn't you get the memo? People, and yes even factory workers, are far better off now than years ago.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    77. Re:Pffft by myth24601 · · Score: 3, Funny

      They could be paid $500/week, but that still wouldn't make up for the fact that they're forced to work 70 hour work weeks.

      It isn't right to treat factory workers like they work in IT just because they are building high-tech equipment.

      --
      No matter where you go, there you are.
    78. Re:Pffft by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 1

      "Old", "New", and "Third"? That doesn't even make sense. It's "First", "Second", and "Third".

      In Mao's "Three World Theory", the three worlds are in reference to:

      • First = The super-powers
      • Second = The allies of the super-powers
      • Third = Non-aligned nations.

      In the more familiar Western version invented during the Cold War it was (roughly):

      • First: Industrialized, democratic, capitalistic nations (or the US and its allies)
      • Second: Industrialized, communist nations. (or the USSR, China, and their allies)
      • Third: Everyone else.

      Since the fall of the USSR, the terms refer more to a country's level of wealth or development.

      The terms "old world" and "new world" have nothing to do with this.

      --
      Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
    79. Re:Pffft by wildstoo · · Score: 1

      I own 50% of my company... It's the other half of the problem that drives this people to kill themselves. It's having a life with no purpose other than to serve your capitalist overlords.

      Yes, I imagine it's a bit different if you ARE the capitalist overlord.

    80. Re:Pffft by ffflala · · Score: 1

      FTFA: "And they were made to promise that if they did, their families would only seek the legal minimum in damages."

      So, there is some form of enforcement after all. The legality of this, I couldn't say.

      I don't know if it applies to China -- I get the idea that China law is sold to the highest bidder, with discounts for nepotism. But in non-corrupt contract theory, one person does not have the capacity to contract away the rights of another, at least not as described here.

    81. Re:Pffft by nobodie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, falling bodies... I was in Nanjing last weekend with my wife (studying at at the Nanjing TCM university) and was telling her how it is really getting on my nerves about people walking in the bike and motorcycle lane when the sidewalk is empty. Apparently this was an old rant, cause she said she had heard it before and mentioned it to one of her Chinese teachers. The teacher looked embarrassed and said that it became standard practice after a few people were killed by being fallen upon by suicides back in the 60' or 70's. Now it is SOP to never walk on a sidewalk that goes up against a building.

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
    82. Re:Pffft by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      or how about the KRUPP way? that's the industry what ford tried to copy but failed, because he forgot about the worker. you know what's the best way to shaft communists? give better benefits and education so they can work better and also not feel so lost in a mindless job with no end in sight.

      do those foxconn drones have any possibility to build up skills and creativity? hell no. even the work they do would be better done by machines - but it's simpler to take a huge mortage and build a city and use interchangeable low skill workers and then if a big order comes just make the assembly line work faster! that's the mistake ford made, he could have produced a lot more if he had spent more time engineering the line better, than by simply switching the line to work faster and by throwing more people at it. and that is why the usa auto industry has bankrupted itself many times over the decades, the legacy of acting like ford. and guess what americans have been pushing as the industrial genious who's methods you should follow? well, ford. he is after all the guy who invented the assembly line, though assembly lines had been in use since ancient egypt.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krupp for those in the dark(it's not a total success story, but illustrates the difference).

      and how swatch fucked over all the far east clock makers? essentially by making a clock making machine.

      unions tend to work on the principle that the work is eternal, whilst in reality all manufacturing and development is temporary and continous improvement just makes sense for everyone, it also makes working not so boring that you want to kill yourself.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    83. Re:Pffft by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      Oh, given that comment and your username, I see you believe in imaginary people in the sky. If that's the case, please do us all a favor and commit suicide.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    84. Re:Pffft by tibit · · Score: 1

      I've been looking at some numbers and if Apple could weather approx. 2 years worth of 50% cut in net profits, they could set up to manufacture all of their equipment in the U.S. at the same cost as they do now in FoxConn factories -- maybe not in California, but definitely in the U.S. They'd need plenty of automation, of course, but that's IMHO still a better deal -- I don't see why we should, in effect, subsidize China's working class.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    85. Re:Pffft by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      In Utah that might be considered normal

    86. Re:Pffft by kubernet3s · · Score: 1

      You know, this should just be the default first post for every Slashdot story. It fits almost all of them.

    87. Re:Pffft by pyrr · · Score: 1

      That Foxconn employees have a choice to work there (or not) speaks volumes of how far China has come with pseudo-capitalism. There was a day, not very long ago, when folks' career choices in China were limited, because the government decided where they should work, the government set wages, and the government decided what safe working conditions were. The government decided what they could buy, what the prices on consumer products were, and where they'd live. Because, of course, you can't choose where you'll live if you can't own any real property, because the government owns it all and distributes it as they see fit.

      The important thing to remember is that choice is the essence of competition, which empowers people to make demands. Nothing poses more danger to a totalitarian or socialist government than people making demands rather than just accepting the commands.

    88. Re:Pffft by CheerfulMacFanboy · · Score: 1

      There was at least one case where the suicidée wrote in his suicide note that he only killed himself because of benefits for his family. You are advocating for more suicides.

      --
      Fandroids hate facts.
    89. Re:Pffft by independent123 · · Score: 1

      We've been told that we must "compete" with that system in order to keep our jobs. Is competing a necessity like a law of physics or is it a choice that someone makes? If our workers only work 40 hours a week for decent wages, does that threaten our survival?

    90. Re:Pffft by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1
      The KRUPP way; from the wikipedia article you linked to:

      Krupp Industries employed workers conscripted by the Nazi regime from across Europe. These workers were initially paid, but as Nazi fortunes declined they were kept as slave workers. They were abused, beaten, and starved by the thousands, as detailed in the book The Arms of Krupp.

      I guess that helps to explain your comment that "it's not a total success story".

    91. Re:Pffft by HeadlessNotAHorseman · · Score: 1

      I thought the term came from the Cold War. First world was the US and its allies, second world was the Soviet Union, China and their allies, and third world were all of the neutral, non-aligned countries. By coincidence, the third world countries also had a tendency to be poorer countries, so the term third world became associated with poverty. Source: Wikipedia.

      --
      I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.
    92. Re:Pffft by georgesdev · · Score: 1

      They call themselves "People's Republic of China"...

    93. Re:Pffft by Bobakitoo · · Score: 1

      Things became better in the US not because of the government, but because of Union organization and dollars and cents.

      Unions worked only because the government enforced the freedom of assembly. The corporations fought unions with intimitation, beating and starvation. Without government protection, union could not exist.

      Same thing will happen in China as the US falls apart and becomes France [...]

      When the US will fall apart it will become like noting else. Noting like that happened before, any wild speculation could be possible. But if similarity must be drawn, it will be closer to the soviet union. Certainly not France, that is noting like the US.

      Well played, +2 insightful for trolling hate for France and hate for 'big' government...

  2. That'll show them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, they better not kill themselves OR ELSE!

    1. Re:That'll show them by Dogtanian · · Score: 2

      Yeah, they better not kill themselves OR ELSE!

      Or else their family will get bugger-all compensation because the employee signed an agreement not to commit suicide, whereas they might have stood a chance of getting more otherwise.

      This *might* or might not work in the Chinese legal system, but I wouldn't bet large amounts against it. And (as others have already said) even if all it does is put a few people off by making it *appear* harder to sue, it's probably worth the relatively small cost of inclusion.

      An example of how, even- well, especially- on Slashdot, there exists the desire to be a smartass and jump on an easy opportunity to feel superior to someone else's "stupidity", even if that stupidity is just a bit too much to be taken at face value. When in fact the genuinely clever person would be asking and finding out why a massive company would include such an ostensibly stupid clause and what the underlying motivations might *really* be.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  3. Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    See this is why I don't understand everyone bitching about the American economy being broken. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't... but one thing is for sure. We are using paid employee's to try and compete with a country that essentially uses prisoners to power there economy. Whos confused about why we are losing??

    1. Re:Ugh by squidflakes · · Score: 5, Informative

      We also use our huge prisoner population for all sorts of work. Telemarketing, small time manufacture, and now even some electronic components. All made by prisoners who were probably put in to jail thanks to our ridiculous "War on Drugs" and politicians who want to appear tough on crime.

    2. Re:Ugh by Skarecrow77 · · Score: 2

      Nobody is confused. everybody just wants to pretend we can compete with that. We can't.

      Either we have to lower standards for our workers, or they have to raise theirs.

      Either solution is probably going to involve and armed revolution somewhere along the line, one way or another.

    3. Re:Ugh by migla · · Score: 2

      See this is why I don't understand everyone bitching about the American economy being broken. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't... but one thing is for sure. We are using paid employee's to try and compete with a country that essentially uses prisoners to power there economy. Whos confused about why we are losing??

      Who's losing? Apple? Us consumers who get lower prices thanks to exploitation of the workers?

      This is global capitalism. It sure screws many of us middle class westerners a bit too, but the capitalists have migrated the working class to china and are screwing them real good.

      --
      Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
    4. Re:Ugh by cpu6502 · · Score: 2

      >>>a country that essentially uses prisoners to power their economy.

      This is why I think the US and EU should block all goods coming from this company (Foxconn) and other companies that treat their employees like prisoners/paid slaves. We can't enforce human rights in China, but we can make the decision to boycott the goods, just as would boycott "blood diamond" companies.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    5. Re:Ugh by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

      Having put in multiple 70 hour weeks lately (and having co-workers talk about their 80 hour weeks) it seems like we are losing that battle.

      But their wages are going up 20% to 100% per year. Given the very low starting bases, it will be about 8 years before it just doesn't make sense to make a lot of products there and then ship them over here.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    6. Re:Ugh by peragrin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem is foxconn while notable is better than many other places because Apple is forcing them to step up. you don't hear about Acer's companies or another's because they are generally doing nothing.

      Apple is forcing foxconn to step up and treat it's people better. That is why it is news.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    7. Re:Ugh by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

      All made by prisoners who were probably put in to jail thanks to our ridiculous "War on Drugs" and politicians who want to appear tough on crime.

      Without arguing that the "War on Drugs" is a good idea or in some way fair, don't you have to be at least a little stupid to get involved with drugs knowing that you could spend your days alternating between having to telemarket and being pounded in the ass as a result?

      I mean, there's lots of things I'd like to do that I don't agree with the laws on, but orange jumpsuit is a terrible look for me and so I don't.

    8. Re:Ugh by Kvasio · · Score: 1

      Could you remind me which country was so greedy 20 years ago that decided to use cheap Chinese labour despite that they knew these were commies treating their citizens no better than Ghaddafi now?

      I recon, there were various countries, but think that there was one major source of investment.

      You created this monster. Learn to live with it or do something about it - but stop whining.

    9. Re:Ugh by Lysander7 · · Score: 2

      to power there economy. Whos confused about why we are losing??

      Because some of us don't know the correct usage of "there" and "their"?

    10. Re:Ugh by evildarkdeathclicheo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Pardon? Capitalism has never functioned in the history of the world without slavery. True, some countries outlawed slavery, including the US, but migrant workers and outsourcing overseas filled in the gap that slavery left behind. The American economy is only broken if you disagree with the concept of slavery. No one in the US is trying to use paid employees to try and compete with a country that uses prisoners to power their economy. It is AMERICA that is using prisoners in other countries to power ITS OWN economy . . . only because it's illegal to do so within its own borders. Don't kid yourself and think that just because it doesn't happen in your own backyard that it isn't your, or your neighbors, own fault. You wouldn't be able to post on slashdot without this slave/prisoner labor. -W

    11. Re:Ugh by navyjeff · · Score: 2

      Depends on your situation. If it's between selling drugs and going hungry, I could see why people might choose the former. That's probably why you don't see a lot of white collar people selling drugs.

    12. Re:Ugh by operagost · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If it's between selling drugs and going hungry, I could see why people might choose the former.

      It's rarely that kind of dilemma. I mean, we could justify all sorts of crimes that way: if it's between prostituting your child and going hungry; between armed robbery and going hungry; between grand theft and going hungry...

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    13. Re:Ugh by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      About 5 years ago the phrase was "the sleeping dragon has awoken". That was in reference to China's economy. They took in rural villiagers who were just getting by and put them to work in a factory. They gave them so little, but it's better then nothing. Now if China develops a middle-class then things would change drastically. They'd start to buy up oil, raising the price sharply and leading to that global peak oil scenario.
      ...oh wait.
      But no, the peasants in China are not going to put up with THIS sort of treatment for long, but it's going to be a generation or two before they forget the poverty of pre-boom China. You can't extrapolate 100% pay raises out to eight years, but there's some truth to your words.

    14. Re:Ugh by mrnobo1024 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nobody is confused. everybody just wants to pretend we can compete with that. We can't.

      Either we have to lower standards for our workers, or they have to raise theirs.

      Or, we could bring back what we used to have before the globalists took over circa 1970 and the standard of living here stopped growing: tariffs.

      Although, I suppose throwing the globalists out to do that would probably require an armed revolution too.

    15. Re:Ugh by operagost · · Score: 1

      I didn't create this monster. Speak for yourself.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    16. Re:Ugh by Sir_Sri · · Score: 1

      Maybe we're confused because only working 12 hour days 6 days a week is a huge improvement in the quality of life for a lot of chinese factory workers, and living in what could alternately be called cheap student housing or prison but without bars is actually an improvement in the quality of life for hundreds of thousands of them. Foxconn isn't perfect, no one who does business in china is. But you have to judge the quality of life Foxconn workers get compared to what they would get elsewhere in china... and it's not far off from average.

      They're 'winning' because their standards of success and wealth are much, much lower than ours, and they are in a labour market that makes 10% unemployment in the US look appealing if you are low skilled. Tens if not hundreds of million other job seekers coming from the fields into the cities thrilled to only work 6 days a week and only 12 hours a day. At one point in the early 1800's the 10 hour work day was a huge improvement in Britain, and china, economically, is just barely coming out of the 1800's.

    17. Re:Ugh by alienzed · · Score: 1

      Those are some bad examples though, because: between prostituting your child and going hungry ->i'd go hungry between armed robbery and going hungry ->i'd sell the gun between grand theft and going hungry ->i'd commit petty theft. I think some 'laws' cross the line when they stop minding society's rightful business. Someone killing someone else is certainly society's business. Someone getting high and finishing two bags of lays... well that's most American without the getting high part.

      --
      Never say never. Ah!! I did it again!
    18. Re:Ugh by Velex · · Score: 1

      Maybe you have one of those medical conditions some doctors are recommending marihuana for due to its low side effect profile and high efficacy. Maybe using marihuana means the difference between being in constant pain and bedridden even with the drugs big pharma produces and being able to function.

      Maybe the risk is worth it to some people.

      Just sayin'

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
    19. Re:Ugh by countertrolling · · Score: 2

      That's probably why you don't see a lot of white collar people selling drugs.

      Excuse me? How many brothers you know making that kind of money?

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    20. Re:Ugh by mrxak · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have an iPad than work for pennies. I think we're winning. They're also winning because they get to eat. Money changing hands is always win-win.

      People freak out about the trade deficit, but it's not like we're paying more for Chinese-manufactured goods than the goods are worth. Capitalism means you pay exactly how much an item is worth, no more no less. Yes, we're sending a lot of our money overseas, but money is only as good as what it allows you to buy. All this cash in my wallet might as well just be toilet paper, except for the fact I can use it to get stuff.

      Stuff is quality of life. Stuff > money. And by the way, the Chinese are buying stuff too from other places, and some of those places are buying stuff from us. As long as money keeps flowing, and stuff keeps flowing, everybody wins.

    21. Re:Ugh by DarkTempes · · Score: 1

      There is something wrong when the "land of the free and the home of the brave" has the highest per capita incarceration numbers and the largest prison population by more than double the next (we have less than 5% of the world's population but over 25% of its inmates).

      That would be a SERIOUSLY larger percentage of 'stupid' incidence compared to the rest of the world...

    22. Re:Ugh by DarkIye · · Score: 2

      don't you have to be at least a little stupid to get involved with drugs knowing that you could spend your days alternating between having to telemarket

      You could get hit pretty hard for illegal filesharing or drinking during prohibition, too, but at the end of the day, when the law's bullshit, fuck it.

      and being pounded in the ass

      Myth?

    23. Re:Ugh by mrxak · · Score: 1

      And if they weren't, those same people would have no jobs at all, and be starving to death. Their conditions might not be up to western standards of living, but they are comparable to every industrializing nation throughout history, and the end result of industrialization is always current western standards of living.

      Why is it people expect everywhere in the world to be at the exact same level of social and economic progress, just because they wish it so? It simply doesn't work that way. People scrape together a bare living however they can, which improves their overall economy, which gives their children and grandchildren and great grandchildren the possibility to not only exist, but to live better too.

      Yes, it's a shame Chinese workers are so desperate for a job that they'll work for pennies and live in the sorts of conditions we find uncomfortable. The solution to that, however, cannot possibly be to not give them ANY jobs.

    24. Re:Ugh by blair1q · · Score: 1

      What you mean "we", white man?

      The same corporations who are hiring us are hiring them.

      You and I and they are the same employees.

      The corporations are winning. We, the employees, are losing.

      You still think this is a nationalistic issue?

    25. Re:Ugh by Velex · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's probably why you don't see a lot of white collar people selling drugs.

      Not to derail the topic too far, but I see white collar people selling addictive drugs that give the user a high all the time. It's just that when we're talking about drugs that are approved by big pharma/big government, the dealer is called a doctor. And believe me, doctors act just like drug dealers, too. I had one doctor start to tell me he would call a hit out on me if I couldn't make his alpha pager work when it was turned off. According to the board of directors at a local hospital, it may not be safe for me to be one of their patients because of a dispute they had about a bill. Doctors are drug dealers, little more, and once you figure that you, a lot of things start to make sense about the prohibition of substances such as marihuana. The medical establishment doesn't want competition from a substance that doesn't cost a dime to grow.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
    26. Re:Ugh by Valacosa · · Score: 2

      Without arguing that social hygene is a good idea or in some way fair, don't you have to be at least a little stupid to get involved with hiding Jews knowing that you could spend your days alternating between having to telemarket and being pounded in the ass as a result?

      I mean, there's lots of things I'd like to do that I don't agree with the laws on, but orange jumpsuit is a terrible look for me and so I don't.

      I know I've Godwin'd the thread, but it illustrates my point: it's a bad idea to blindly follow the law, and it's poor critical thinking to blindly condemn those who don't. There are good arguments for not getting involved with drugs, but that's not one of them.

      --
      "Live as if you'll die tomorrow." Ridiculous. You could die later today.
    27. Re:Ugh by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      Yet Apple still willfully makes use of these slave labor camp/factories. That is why they don't deserve the benefit of the doubt.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    28. Re:Ugh by Skarecrow77 · · Score: 2

      Or, we could bring back what we used to have before the globalists took over circa 1970 and the standard of living here stopped growing: tariffs.

      How do you plan on explaining to consumers that the majority of their goods will now cost significantly more, perhaps several times as much? Ok, better question, how will a politician explain that, and still get re-elected?

    29. Re:Ugh by sjames · · Score: 1

      We bitch about our economy being broken because if it wasn't, we wouldn't allow the sale of goods and services made in such a hellhole of a factory. We would at the least stack the economic considerations against it. We complain because we would like to not end up with the same conditions here for ourselves or our children.

      If we wait until it's actually that bad here to complain, it'll be a bit late to fix it.

    30. Re:Ugh by bruno.fatia · · Score: 1

      Or, we could bring back what we used to have before the globalists took over circa 1970 and the standard of living here stopped growing: tariffs.

      Although, I suppose throwing the globalists out to do that would probably require an armed revolution too.

      What you suggest is, fundamentally, stop consuming chinese products. Higher duty means it's more expensive so less people will buy.
      The biggest problem is that the US were stupid enough to move all the industry to China and collect money on royalties and copyright (which is why the US politicians write more and more laws to make copyright stronger but that's for another story). It did seem like a good idea at the time to make money on IP and offshore al the production, most economists during the 90s endorsed that move and many companies followed that road. Ford and Honda produce a lot of cars in Mexico for the US, I guess Nike has a marketing and R&D dept. on the US but not a single factory. There are many examples. I was in NY last year and I could not find any clothing made in the US, most were from Egypt, China, Vietnam, and others where minimum wage is likely under 300USD (probably even less). For the reasons above you can't just tax every import from China and hope it will be ok, because (1) China would bitch about it to the WTO (2) it would simply cause inflation because there is no industry in the country to supply the demand.
      I hope this wasn't too confuse (english isn't my first language)

    31. Re:Ugh by cusco · · Score: 1

      If you mean 'selling drugs on the street', you're right. If you mean 'not involved in the drug trade' you're dead wrong. A trillion dollars gets laundered through the US banking system every year, half of it from the drug trade. We're the world's largest money laundry (which is why Shrub withdrew from the Anti-Money Laundering Accord less than two weeks after inauguration). Banks earn 10-20 percent on money laundering, one of their most lucrative lines of business. That's why we have former Treasury Secretaries running 'Private Banking' divisions of major banks.

      The guy on the street corner isn't the one making the money. The guy at the bank, or the trucking company, or the import warehouse, or the owner of the McDonald's or Sheraton franchise used as a front, or the stockbroker, those are the guys making the big bucks. The cops don't go after them because they can afford expensive lawyers to get the evidence thrown out before anyone is even booked, and they contribute to the winning politicians. When it comes to a choice between looking like Serpico because you've arrested the guy who distributes to all of South Tacoma, or ruining your career arresting the governor's golfing buddy and then losing the case, not many cops are going to do the latter.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    32. Re:Ugh by Nyder · · Score: 1

      See this is why I don't understand everyone bitching about the American economy being broken. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't... but one thing is for sure. We are using paid employee's to try and compete with a country that essentially uses prisoners to power there economy. Whos confused about why we are losing??

      Except we aren't competing. We are shipping all our work over there to get done cheaper.

      This is capitalism, in it's finest.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    33. Re:Ugh by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      you don't explain it to the morans/masses.

      you take LEADERSHIP, take the risk and do what is right. even if you don't get re-elected.

      someone has to have balls. but we have had gonad-less leaders for decades, now. no one takes a risk like that anymore.

      democracies don't always work. in this case, you need a 'benevolent king' to just take the initiative and do what is right, regardless of the populaces' complaints.

      yes, costs will go up. if we don't do this, joblessness will be much much worse than just some higher prices.

      we are guilty of short term thinking (again).

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    34. Re:Ugh by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      Mostly, people that I run into are looking for an easy way to get what they want. If someone comes up to them and offers them $10,000 for doing something illegal more often than not they are going to be thinking "Gosh, $10,000... what can I buy with that?" rather than "How many years might I be in prison if I get caught?"

      Further, in the US the actual conviction rate is pretty low for just about everything. So unless you are a complete idiot and brag to random people in a bar (one of whom might be a cop) about your exploits, you stand a pretty good chance of getting away with anything. A couple of times. See, the fact that it may only be a 20% conviction rate means that if you rob five stores your chances are not 0.20 / 5 (0.04) but 0.20 * 5 (1.00) - sooner or later a life of crime will catch up with you. Problem is, the fact you are almost certainly going to get away the first few times makes it look like easy money. And people certainly believe the odds are in their favor and only the unlucky get caught.

      The same goes for just about any sort of crime, not just armed robbery. Dealing drugs? Sure. Stealing from the cash register at work? Easy. And it is addicting coming home with a pocket full of money that used to belong to someone else.

      We also have this odd policy in the US that says children that commit crimes are treated as if it was a simple mistake in their education - nobody told them that crime was wrong. So they often get away with whatever they did or just get some very mild punishment so as to not warp their little psyche. The problem is, like all humans, these children learn that crime indeed does pay even when you get caught. Because in their experience crime does pay far far better than anything else they have ever experienced.

      The government reinforces this kind of thinking because punishment of crime seems random to most people involved in crime. And the government overall seems capricious and incomprehensible to people whos only interaction with it is the police and courts. The news media doesn't help either. The latest bit about only 45% of people paying taxes - they mean only 45% of people pay in extra in April but it sounds like everyone is getting a good deal except you because you know you are paying - they take them out every week.

    35. Re:Ugh by rastoboy29 · · Score: 1

      I don't think it is a zero sum game, and therefore the notion that they are "winning" and we are "losing" is nonsense.

      After all:

      Most countries in the world envy our 91% employment rate (or 9% unemployment rate if you see the glass as less than ten percent empty).

      We may lose manufacturing jobs, but that does mean stuff is much cheaper to buy for us.  From a purely selfish point of view, I'm aged 40 and in my lifetime I've seen the cost of crap in general plummett, especially in the last 20 years.

      If anybody's "losing", it's the Chinese worker.  Unfortunately for us, they are losing but still better off than they were...presumeably.

    36. Re:Ugh by cdrguru · · Score: 2

      In order to enact tariffs, the US would have to pull out of the WTO. If the US tried to block Chinese imports with high tariffs China would be forced to exhert their control over the US economy. You see, China owns the US. Way more than 50% of the country is indirectly owned by the Chinese because of their loans.

      If the US insisted and told China their loans were worthless nobody would trade with the US anymore because they couldn't be trusted.

      If we insisted on tariffs on Chinese goods the result would likely be a shooting war, one that right now the US would lose badly in.

      Nope, sorry. We are stuck with the way things are for a very, very long time.

    37. Re:Ugh by hackus · · Score: 1

      We are ruled by Oligarchs.

      If and when the American people are fed up with Food Stamps, no futures and no jobs, you can bet things will change.

      But be aware, if you think this oligarchy is going to give up the control of trillions in dollars peacefully, you are sadly mistaken.

      The next test of Freedom and Liberty may make the surface of the planet a very grim place to live even if victory is achieved.

      -Hack

      --
      Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
    38. Re:Ugh by Synn · · Score: 1

      I agree it's not slavery, but the economy definitely runs on a lower "has less rights" class. Look at migrant workers. It's illegal, everyone knows it takes place, even knows who uses them, but we let it happen. And the workers don't have many rights. Worker rights? They have no rights. If they complain? They can simply be deported.

      It's a disgrace.

    39. Re:Ugh by bruno.fatia · · Score: 1

      I see Foxconn is so much better because Apple makes them treat their employees better: Sign a contract so your family doesn't get shit in case you suicide inside your fab. Apple is so nice, and you are so naive :)
      Apple doesn't give a shit to people (like all the other corporations), but they do care however about getting their product cheap and selling with gorgeous profit margins.

    40. Re:Ugh by mjwx · · Score: 1

      you don't explain it to the morans/masses.

      * morons.

      Unless you mean Judy Moran, but she murdered her own brother so I doubt she gives a shit.

      you take LEADERSHIP, take the risk and do what is right. even if you don't get re-elected.

      someone has to have balls. but we have had gonad-less leaders for decades, now. no one takes a risk like that anymore.

      democracies don't always work. in this case, you need a 'benevolent king' to just take the initiative and do what is right, regardless of the populaces' complaints.

      That's just pants on head retarded.

      Same as the idea that protectionism will bring prosperity. We (being the western world in entirety) cannot compete with Asia for manufacturing so we have to compete on other grounds, automation, education, high tech and a whole bunch of stuff that China cannot do. We are not:

      we are guilty of short term thinking (again).

      As much as you are guilty of thinking in the past.

      If the west wants to stay ahead of China, it needs to think ahead of China, this is why we had such economic sucess in the 90's and early 00's. It was mismanagement of the US and Euro banking infrastructure that lead to the collapse, such as GWB artificially keeping interest rates low (when demand should have been driving them up) and allowing insecure loans to be made. Australia did none of those things and well, look at us now, the AUD is worth more than the USD.

      All protectionism will bring is high prices and low choices. I doubt you remember the economic prosperity of the 70's, mainly because there wasn't any.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    41. Re:Ugh by rubycodez · · Score: 2

      it's not capitalism if you enslave someone, it's something else. That's one of the lies of our time, calling wall street fat cats and banksters capitalists. They are enslavers and parasites, and buy lawmakers to keep us from having capitalism.

    42. Re:Ugh by dkleinsc · · Score: 2

      I'd think someone with such a fantastic Carlin quote would realize that George also had a great comment related to this very problem:

      And you know, in this country, now there are alot of people who want to expand the death penalty to include drug dealers. This is really stupid. Drug dealers aren't afraid to die. They're already killing each other every day on the streets by the hundreds. Drive-bys, gang shootings, they're not afraid to die. Death penalty doesn't mean anything unless you use it on people who are afraid to die. Like... the bankers who launder the drug money. The bankers, who launder, the drug money. Forget the dealers, you want to slow down that drug traffic, you got to start executing a few of these fucking bankers. White, middle class Republican bankers. ... You start execut- you start nailing one white banker per week to a big wooden cross, you're going to see that drug traffic begin to slow down pretty fucking quick. Pretty fucking quick- you won't even be able to buy drugs in schools and prisons anymore!

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    43. Re:Ugh by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      See, the fact that it may only be a 20% conviction rate means that if you rob five stores your chances are not 0.20 / 5 (0.04) but 0.20 * 5 (1.00) - sooner or later a life of crime will catch up with you.

      Um, the chance to get caught the first time is .2. But the second time is neither .1 (your first equation) nor .4 (your second). The chance of getting caught the second time (or 5th time) is .2. For any one time, it's the .2. And the chances of getting caught either the first or second time? Why that's .2 of getting caught the first time, and .8 (chance of not getting caught the first time) times .2 (chance of getting caught the second time). .2 + .8*.2 = .36. 0.36 is not equal to .4. As such, every equation you gave was wrong.

      Not that I'm agreeing with or arguing about anything else in your post, but the chance of getting caught by the 5th time you rob a store is certainly not 100%. .2 + (1-.2)*.2 + (1-(1-.2)*.2)*.2 + ... = 81.248% (anyone with actual statistics background, feel free to check me, I'm not a mathematician. But I know enough statistics to know that 100% by the 5th time is crap.

    44. Re:Ugh by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      ever use anything electronic lately? 99% of it comes from china. I love hating on apple too, but this issue isn't unique to apple.

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    45. Re:Ugh by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

      If by "illustrates your point" you mean "makes a bad analogy involving Nazis" I'll give you that.

      No one is doing crack because they think it's some kind of moral imperative; if someone is, it's not because they're a paragon of virtue, it's because they're an idiot.

    46. Re:Ugh by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      hopefully this isn't their way of "treating its people better".

      The fact that they are being forced to sign these things is just further proof of their slave-like working conditions.

      In an attempt to reduce the bad press the company is receiving, they are actually just making it look worse!

      I've yet to see any visible effect of Apple pushing them to improve conditions...hopefully I'm wrong.

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    47. Re:Ugh by X.25 · · Score: 1

      The problem is foxconn while notable is better than many other places because Apple is forcing them to step up. you don't hear about Acer's companies or another's because they are generally doing nothing.

      Okay, so tell us more about Acer's companies, then. We are dying to find out that dirt.

    48. Re:Ugh by khallow · · Score: 1

      If it's between selling drugs and going hungry, I could see why people might choose the former.

      It's rarely that kind of dilemma. I mean

      It's more the difference between getting rich and working a minimum wage job. If you have a poor education or limited career opportunities due to a criminal record, then this sort of job can be lucrative (well, once you advance beyond the rank and file). Armed robbery and grand theft just aren't real money makers unless you're going for huge thefts.

    49. Re:Ugh by krazytekn0 · · Score: 1

      Then everyone will be bitching about their smartphones costing $3000. Sorry, human rights don't mean jack to someone half a world away standing in a verizon/ATT store. Tell me with 100% certainty that nothing on the computer you posted on was made by people in a similar or worse situation. For that matter, how about your clothes, your watch, your sports equipment, tools, electronics in your car, the elevator in the last hotel you stayed at. Sorry but when it comes to a choice between an individual's comfort and taking one drop out of the ocean of bad labor conditions in the world, people choose comfort/convenience, yourself included.

      --
      Not all life is cyber. Extra Income
    50. Re:Ugh by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      But their wages are going up 20% to 100% per year. Given the very low starting bases, it will be about 8 years before it just doesn't make sense to make a lot of products there and then ship them over here.

      Unfortunately, 8 years is too long... our own manufacturing base will have been wiped out and our economy destroyed... which is the long term Chinese goal. They don't give a sh1t about their environment or their workers as long as we're losing as a result...

      unfortunately, our own CEOs are beholden to the shareholder value rules and thus are forced to outsource production etc. to cheaper facilities... there's no long term company survival rule in place to protect shareholders and force CEOs to put long term survival ahead of the next quarter's results... perhaps if the stock options involved their own money being put up front and held for say 4 years before being able to option and also their bonuses being dependant upon long term goals...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    51. Re:Ugh by generica1 · · Score: 1

      As long as money keeps flowing, and stuff keeps flowing, everybody wins.

      Don't you see how that's painfully unsustainable? There's either going to be a time when we don't need as much stuff, or a time when there is not enough raw resources left to make stuff.

      --
      JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP IRRIGATE
    52. Re:Ugh by Altanar · · Score: 2

      Better question: Why do we, the West, think it is our right be be ahead of China? Aren't 1.3 billion people allowed to have a quality of life close to ours? All things considered, why shouldn't Europe+USA's population of 1.1 billion be out produced by China's 1.3?

    53. Re:Ugh by Dasher42 · · Score: 1

      There needs to be a stiff tariff on trade with a country with such practices, in my opinion. If you don't do it, you ratify some level of slavery, and not only are slaves demeaned, but working people are devalued. That allows a privileged few to get rich off of other people - nothing more.

    54. Re:Ugh by Laurence0 · · Score: 1

      Close. Well, closer than the GP. :-)

      Assuming a fixed chance of 20% of being caught every time, there's an 80% chance of not being caught, so the chance of not being caught 5 times is 0.8^5 = 0.32 (2sf), so the chances of being caught at some point in your first 5 crimes is 1-0.32 = 0.68, 68%

      The chance of being caught on the 5th crime (but not before) is 0.8^4 * 0.2 = 0.082, 8%

    55. Re:Ugh by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The key difference being that a doctor is supposed to only sell drugs to people he/she things needs them and will not be harmed (too much) by taking them. Unlike crack dealers they have to attend medical school for several years.

      Certain drugs are illegal mostly for historical reasons. If tobacco were discovered today it would be banned, but because people have been smoking it for hundreds of years and only realised it was bad 50-60 years ago when it was already extremely popular it is difficult to do anything about it now. Other substances are illegal because there was a moral panic about them at some point, and a very few because there is a genuine medical reason why people shouldn't take them.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    56. Re:Ugh by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Doesn't work like that. Wages are going up because manufacturing in China is now capable of making expensive high tech products instead of cheap just cheap moulded plastic toys. Higher profit margins and more demand for skills. It will top out though because eventually they will come to the limit of what we are willing to pay, and it will be less than what the product would cost if we made it ourselves.

      The reason the workers keep killing themselves is that they become trapped. The wages are better than average because of the semi-skilled work and low cost of living due the Foxconn providing accommodation. The worker's families come to depend on this income, and it isn't like the worker can just switch to a better job if they are unhappy. If they quit they let down their family, if they stay they are suffering unbearably. The shame of not being able to accept either option leaves them with only one way out.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    57. Re:Ugh by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Don't drag Europe into this! Over here we are of the opinion that everyone can have quality of life and it isn't a question of us /or/ them. Most Americans seem to see the rise of China as a threat but Europe generally perceives it as everyone getting more prosperous. Of course jobs get farmed out to China which makes someone here redundant, but the nature of work is that it keeps changing and for every job we lose a new, hopefully better, one is created.

      People transitioned from farming to factories to offices. From manual to semi-skilled to clerical. People dislike change but it is necessary for conditions to improve, and if you look at the last couple of hundred years they have pretty much continuously.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    58. Re:Ugh by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      [citation needed]

      Acer and ASUS make parts and products for Apple, Microsoft, Sony, HP, Dell and numerous others. I can't find any stories about suicides at their factories. Why would Apple only be forcing Foxconn to step up while ignoring ASUS? Why would the press ignore Acer's factories?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    59. Re:Ugh by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

      ... because people are born pot dealers?

    60. Re:Ugh by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Wages go up because you can't find workers at the lower wage any more.

      Simple manufacturing jobs went from $187 to $350 in one year because they could no longer find workers at $187.

      The chinese labor market is getting saturated. So is the indian labor market. This very temporary period where there were a lot of workers available for $6 per day is ending.

      The remaining unexploited labor pools are much smaller.

      Likewise, as parts of chinese society get good incomes ($10k to $20k) they "bid up" the cost of living for everyone. Going to the doctor is no longer so cheap. Getting Ginseng from your chinese doctor isn't as cheap. Rent within 20 miles of the work area isn't as cheap. (hence foxxcon's dorms - but the cost of maintaining the dorms is going up- we went through similar stages in the US).

      World labor costs will head towards equal. Our stagnate and even decline-- theirs skyrocket.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    61. Re:Ugh by Skarecrow77 · · Score: 1

      Sad thing is, to a lot of Americans, that will probably be the best way to explain it.

    62. Re:Ugh by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Although, I suppose throwing the globalists out to do that would probably require an armed revolution too.

      No. If you have enough people together to win an armed revolution based on your idea, you have enough people to win it through a fair election. That's the great thing about democracy......it makes armed revolutions unnecessary. You seem to think there is a huge population base that believes the same as you, that tariffs are a good thing, whereas in reality, most people are opposed to (or indifferent to) tariffs.

      If you really want to bring back tariffs, or push any other major change, your first goal should be to convince most people that they are important, and good. From there you can focus on the finer technique of getting the change passed (or wait while other perceptive politicians notice a chance to get more votes and do it for you).

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    63. Re:Ugh by onesandzeros · · Score: 1

      I had one doctor start to tell me he would call a hit out on me if I couldn't make his alpha pager work when it was turned off. According to the board of directors at a local hospital, it may not be safe for me to be one of their patients because of a dispute they had about a bill.

      You mean you were the tech guy, and he threatened to take out a contract on your life because you couldn't make his pager work when it was turned off? Was this said in jest?

      Regardless, this and lots of other comments on /. make me think it would be good to have a category for tech/programmer/related workers' labor issues, quality of life, that sort of thing.

  4. Re:Right... by pak9rabid · · Score: 3

    Their families losing the right to sue Foxconn for shitloads of money.

  5. I'm sure that will work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I bet that will work as well as that pledge to not use sarcasm I signed.

    1. Re:I'm sure that will work by moco · · Score: 1

      my kingdom for mod points!

      --
      moi
    2. Re:I'm sure that will work by j-beda · · Score: 1

      I bet that will work as well as that pledge to not use sarcasm I signed.

      I think there is actually some evidence that people contemplating suicide actually do tend to keep promises that they make to not kill themselves. Thus if you are talking to someone who is suicidal, getting them to promise not to off themselves tends to prevent them from doing so. I don't know about signing such a pledge well in advance of being suicidal however.

    3. Re:I'm sure that will work by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I don't know about signing such a pledge well in advance of being suicidal however.

      "We're going to offer you an awesome job here, but you have to sign this here promising that you won't commit suicide after you find out what it actually involves."

      Must be quite a hiring line.

    4. Re:I'm sure that will work by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      It doesn't work as well that way (signing a pledge to a company to not commit suicide, whether suicidal at that point or turning so later, as opposed to something more personal). They don't like leaving things undone. So if you know someone suicidal, make them promise something a week out. Make it unique, even if repetitive (rather than a lunch date every Tuesday, just have lunch with them Tuesday, then make them promise on that Tuesday to have lunch with you again the next Tuesday and repeat without it every being an "assumed" lunch). That will leave them wanting to cancel before they kill themselves. And if they ever cancel with no articulable reason, step in as if they just said "I will kill myself before next Tuesday."

      I've never seen where promises to not kill ones self made essentially to strangers would help. Though it has received jokes, the part about limiting liability does actually help. As the suicidal people want to provide for those they leave behind, they'll want insurance to pay out and such. And that may be more a deterrent than the rest of the pledge, even if it's being bashed for being insensitive, it's likely the most persuasive part of the pledge to the actually suicidal people.

      Disclaimer, I may have a psychology degree and some experience with suicidal people.

  6. Effectiveness by Translation+Error · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The vast majority of people who commit suicide are not thinking rationally at the time. No pledges, no clauses that say family members will only sue for the minimum monetary compensation allowable, will make a difference to someone not in their right mind.

    --
    When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
    1. Re:Effectiveness by davidshewitt · · Score: 2

      Foxconn doesn't give half a shit about keeping their employees from committing suicide. The reason they are forcing their workers to sign a no-suicide pact is to keep family members from suing for more than the minimum compensation. Disgusting.

    2. Re:Effectiveness by destroygbiv · · Score: 1

      Agree. If you're on fire, there's little anybody can say to keep you from jumping into the swimming pool.

    3. Re:Effectiveness by Translation+Error · · Score: 1

      You don't know that. Nobody knows that.

      We can get a pretty good idea by talking to people who tried to commit suicide but failed.

      --
      When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
    4. Re:Effectiveness by mcferguson · · Score: 1

      Imagine you live in a communist country with no hope of freedom, democracy, or a living wage. Your job is to toil your entire life in miserable conditions and make frivolous, expensive toys for your rich neighbor across the ocean. Now, is suicide really an irrational response to that Kafkaesque environment?

  7. Foxconn != Apple by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 5, Informative

    Why every time Foxconn is mentioned it is automatically associated with Apple. Foxconn manufacturers for large number of clients including Logitech and Dell. Maybe I'm just being new again?

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    1. Re:Foxconn != Apple by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the ones who work on products for Dell and Logitech don't have to sign the pledge?

      After all, they don't have the pressure of building iPads--the magical device. Your Dell doesn't work? So what else is new? On the other hand, you make a mistake building an iPad and some Fanboi will cry all over the Internet. That's a lot of pressure.

      On the other hand, building Dells day in and day out might cause me to consider suicide...

    2. Re:Foxconn != Apple by sandytaru · · Score: 2

      They also make HP stuff. As to why Apple gets trumpeted out, it's because the Apple crowd also tends to be more environmentally conscious as a general rule. Corporate America, which runs on the other products, doesn't give a shit about the treatment of workers overseas, as we well know. But Apple's user base is primarily consumer. You can bet many an Apple user diligently recycles, drives a hybrid car, and eats organic vegetables. And yet they allow Apple to make their products in China and STILL charge them a premium for the brand name.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    3. Re:Foxconn != Apple by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the ones working on Apple products are also paid more than the ones working on any other product, per Apple's requirements. (not that is this excuses them being forced to work overtime, voluntarily or pressured into it etc).

      Apple does have a code of conduct for its suppliers, but just how effective it is is up to the individual suppliers. Even if it was all done locally (ie, on US soil) you still face that issue - just look at the slaughterhouses and general fast food industry - the conditions at Foxconn are probably better.

    4. Re:Foxconn != Apple by Shadowmist · · Score: 1

      Why every time Foxconn is mentioned it is automatically associated with Apple. Foxconn manufacturers for large number of clients including Logitech and Dell. Maybe I'm just being new again?

      You're not a true Slashdotter if you don't bash Apple.... for it's Stallmanesque crime of not being "open" tech..

    5. Re:Foxconn != Apple by trapnest · · Score: 1

      >just look at the slaughterhouses and general fast food industry I'm pretty sure the people at foxconn are people though, not animals. Unless you're saying that working at McDonalds is the same as working at foxconn.

    6. Re:Foxconn != Apple by jo_ham · · Score: 2

      You joke, but the cattle that get slaughtered have better protections and laws for their wellbeing.

      Working at a US slaughterhouse is not fun - rife with boarderline-illegal and awful practices. It is at least as bad as working at foxconn.

    7. Re:Foxconn != Apple by hackus · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I am wrong, but Foxconn manufacturing is mostly Apple products.

      Apple is Foxconn's largest customer.

      So, I think Apple could have a great deal of say in all of this if they wanted to.

      -Hack

      --
      Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
    8. Re:Foxconn != Apple by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I am wrong, but Foxconn manufacturing is mostly Apple products.

      You're wrong. Foxconn makes everything, the Kindle, The Xbox360, the Wii, The PS3, Motorola cell phones, Intel branded motherboards. Apple is a big customer, but only about 20% of their business.

      So, I think Apple could have a great deal of say in all of this if they wanted to.

      Apple does have a good deal of say, for the factories supplying Apple, which Apple regularly audits and requires human rights policies to be upheld. You can read their audit and required remediations openly published on Apple's web site as well as see a list of the suppliers Apple has stopped working with entirely because of human rights violations. Now see what information you can find on what all those other companies have done. Have any of them ever done anything to make things better? And it is Apple the Daily Mail decides to pin it on. Brilliant!

    9. Re:Foxconn != Apple by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      It's because these are dedicated factories used to create Apple products. Do you really think Apple would allow any other companies to produce goods alongside theirs? (and that's rhetorical, it's already been reported they demand dedicated facilities...)

      Apple has *extremely* strict requirements and standards for any supplier or manufacturer as far as secrecy and quality control; they just haven't been *quite* as demanding on basic labor protections. If they wanted to, they could stop this treatment at their contract manufacturers - they would just have to pay higher costs, which they are not willing to do. Is that their responsibility? Well, that's the debate, and given they are now one of the largest companies in the world, it makes sense they would be mentioned the most.

  8. six 12-hour shifts a week, 98 hours of overtime by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

    My current job has me doing this. 7 days of 12+ hours. And 45 OT hours each week, or 200 per month.
    (jumps off roof)

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    1. Re:six 12-hour shifts a week, 98 hours of overtime by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's almost as bad as working at EA.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:six 12-hour shifts a week, 98 hours of overtime by dkleinsc · · Score: 2

      Clerk 1: Two people ... three people have fallen to their almost certain death!
      Clerk 2: Must be a board meeting.
      Monty Python brilliancy

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    3. Re:six 12-hour shifts a week, 98 hours of overtime by techsoldaten · · Score: 1

      Now if you said, for an average wage of about $7 daily, I would have felt for you.

    4. Re:six 12-hour shifts a week, 98 hours of overtime by robot256 · · Score: 1

      My current job has me doing this. 7 days of 12+ hours. And 45 OT hours each week, or 200 per month. (jumps off roof)

      What does your hourly rate work out to after overtime pay? I'll bet it's more than theirs (adjusted for local cost of living, of course).

    5. Re:six 12-hour shifts a week, 98 hours of overtime by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I bet they didn't make you sign a pledge not to commit suicide.

  9. What a way to treat the symptoms by dmomo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's akin to saying, "hey, when you kill yourself, they know we are torturing you, so please stop killing yourself".

    Who's signing the "only work so many hours" pledge?

    1. Re:What a way to treat the symptoms by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You have two choices, work 8 hours a day 5 days a week for $25 a week, or work 12 hours a day for 6 days a week for $50 a week. Would you really want to sign something guaranteeing yourself to never have the option that would double your pay? After all, you are living in a company dorm that has no amenities, so the work bench is no worse than time off, and if you had time off, you'd not be spending money on entertainment, so you'd not have an increase in lifestyle to have more time off. Wouldn't you rather have the extra pay? They would, and they'd resent your forcing them to work reasonable hours at the cost of their wages.

      So, why are we trying to enforce our morality on those who do not want it?

  10. Won't that make it worse? by vadim_t · · Score: 2

    It seems to me this provides extra motivation.

    If you try to commit suicide, but fail, you're now in breach of contract and out of a job. Which means two things: If you're going to try at all, it's best to ensure it succeeds. And if you still fail you've now got an extra motivation for giving it another try.

    Then there's that just signing this thing is probably harmful. Somebody could find it to be an additional motivation to commit suicide out of spite. After all, few things are more demeaning than somebody else asserting such control over your own life, and killing yourself anyway is about the biggest statement one could make about that.

    1. Re:Won't that make it worse? by tftp · · Score: 1

      Then there's that just signing this thing is probably harmful. Somebody could find it to be an additional motivation to commit suicide out of spite.

      People who commit suicide out of spite are, how do I say it, "unbalanced" ?

      One belief is that Foxconn people commit suicide to earn a windfall for their family. I don't know how true or untrue this is, but such a document will remove this motivation. This can't be bad.

      But of course if someone still wants to kill oneself, there isn't much that can be done to stop that. It is only possible to eliminate as many motives for such an act as possible. Unfortunately, dissatisfaction with the job can't be eliminated, unless the job is the President of the Universe (with benefits but without obligations.) Some USPS employees committed pretty elaborate suicides by "going postal", and USPS is probably the last place that you'd suspect in sweatshop-like, union-hostile practices.

    2. Re:Won't that make it worse? by Mr.+Beatdown · · Score: 1

      Paging Dostoevsky...

      --
      My fellow Americans, let's restore the death penalty for child rapists. Let's do it . . . for the children.
    3. Re:Won't that make it worse? by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      People who commit suicide out of spite are, how do I say it, "unbalanced" ?

      I don't mean it as the only reason of course, I meant to say that somebody already on the edge might find that to be a reason that pushes them over it.

    4. Re:Won't that make it worse? by tftp · · Score: 1

      So you're implying that the other people who kill themselves are models of well-adjusted sanity?

      Wide brush doesn't work here; it is easy to find a good number of examples when suicide is sane. For example, a terminally ill patient may not want to pay all his life's savings for another month or two of excruciating pain. Or a soldier may commit suicide by voluntarily taking a necessary mission that has no chance of survival. Or a worker at a nuclear plant (say, Fukushima) may work in unhealthy, if not deadly, conditions to repair the damage.

      On the other hand, a girl who eats a whole bottle of aspirin because someone dumped her is probably not thinking it through.

      With regard to Foxconn suicides, if we look at the theory that suiciders did it for money, I have no idea if this theory is true, and secondly - assuming that it is true - I don't know what circumstances could possibly exist to make the suicide a sane, rational choice. How would you classify a man with no skills, low IQ and no hope in life that kills himself so that his ten smart and young brothers and sisters could study in best universities and be successful engineers, as opposed to staying lowly peasants? Is he a basket case? Is he a hero?

  11. Re:Hi, welcome to the Duke lacrosse team by XanC · · Score: 4, Informative

    You mean the Duke lacrosse team which was falsely accused and then hounded by a rogue prosecutor for political reasons, who was eventually disbarred for his misconduct?

  12. Re:Profits before people by Georules · · Score: 1

    Not saying this as an apple fanboy -- Apple is a high-profile company culturally, so it seems to me this kind of news comes out because they know it will be more inflammatory (trolling news). Do you know the working conditions of the other computer manufacturers or of the parts you bought to build your own? Are you sure they are significantly better? Do you buy them anyway? I know I have no idea.

  13. "iPad" factory... troll headline by jo_ham · · Score: 2, Informative

    As usual, especially for the Daily Hate Mail, the title is extremely misleading. It's been covered on slashdot before, but describing Foxconn as an iPad factory, or even an Apple factory is like calling Amazon a "Stephen King bookstore".

    The article strongly infers that the plant *only* makes Apple stuff.

    I also see no mention in the article about Apple's responses to this, with higher wages paid per employee (compared to the same employees in the same factory making Xboxes, PS3s, Nintendo Wiis, Android handsets, televisions, microwaves, etc etc), although they did talk about how little they were earning, and inspections and rules set out in a code of conduct (although, enforcing this is clearly difficult).

    So, nothing really to see here - typical of Daily Mail reporting. I'm just amazed they didn't try to work in a "gay, single-parent-mother asylum seeker claiming benefits and lottery money, causing cancer" angle somehow.

    1. Re:"iPad" factory... troll headline by danhaas · · Score: 1

      There are four very distinct things: the lie, the omission, the truth and ALL the truth. :D

      Despite spinning an anti-Apple reportage, everything sounds true to me. But is it everything that should be said about Foxconn? Nope.

    2. Re:"iPad" factory... troll headline by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between saying "but Dell does it too, that makes it ok!", which I am not doing (conditions in factories like these and the global economics that drive them is something that we need to deal with), but it doesn't mean I can't point out that the article, summary and headline *specifically* demonise Apple without even mentioning that the factory is not actually an "iPad factory" nor an "Apple factory" - it's a factory that makes all manner of consumer goods for countless companies.

      I have already seen a "that's why I'll never buy Apple!!" post on here, presumably posted on a computer that was made in a Foxconn plant! Is it a computer? Yes? It was probably made there, or at least part of it was. Foxconn are the Walmart of electrical suppliers for the large scale manufacturing industry.

    3. Re:"iPad" factory... troll headline by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'll from here on out refer to Linux as "that OS that's used to enable you to play copied PS3 games"

      Oh, wait...

    4. Re:"iPad" factory... troll headline by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      No, the point of the article is lost somewhere in the true reason for this "policy". Despite having a lower suicide rate than the national average, it seems that killing yourself is financially rewarding for the family, and taken by some as a drastic step.

      By omitting key details like that, and that it's not "Apple's" factory, and that Apple themselves instruct that the workers there making Apple stuff get higher wages and better hours than workers making other products is just shoddy, sensationalist journalism - ie, exactly what you expect from the Daily Mail, the UK's most insidious and venomous newspaper.

      If I were to run a story talking about how GeoHot cracked the PS3 Master Key because it was an awesome way to play pirated games and that's the main reason Sony removed Linux ability, because clearly what else is it good for? I am sure someone would correct me.

    5. Re:"iPad" factory... troll headline by superwiz · · Score: 1

      implies -- not infers. try "suggests" if you keep them confused.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  14. Re:All I have to say is... by MoonBuggy · · Score: 2

    Prices are set to maximise profits based on what the market will bear; the extra cost of providing decent manufacturing conditions would have a negligible impact (if any) on end-user pricing.

    What it would impact, however, is the income of the executives. We can't expect them to survive on some few hundred thousand a year pittance, can we? If the income isn't at least 50 times the national median, what would be the point in getting out of bed in the morning?

  15. Suicide nets by lavagolemking · · Score: 5, Insightful
    FTA:

    Anti-suicide nets were put up around the dormitory buildings on the advice of psychologists.

    If you have to put up suicide nets and make people sign contracts promising not to kill themself then you're doing it wrong.

    1. Re:Suicide nets by lennier · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you have to put up suicide nets and make people sign contracts promising not to kill themself then you're doing it wrong.

      So why are we still importing anything that this company makes?

      And if China's laws can't protect workers from this company, then why are we still importing anything China makes?

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    2. Re:Suicide nets by lavagolemking · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the psychologists weren't very expensive...

    3. Re:Suicide nets by operagost · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because hipsters need their iPhones so they can tweet about how America is destroying the planet.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    4. Re:Suicide nets by jandrese · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because it's cheap as hell. Do you investigate the working conditions at the manufacturer for every product you buy? How about your toothbrush? Your underwear? Your ballpoint pen?

      Or do you just pick the cheapest one that meets your minimum critera? It's not like manufacturers put "Made with Slave Labor!" on the package.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    5. Re:Suicide nets by poity · · Score: 1

      Additionally, if their proactive solution is erecting nets, they should be called construction workers rather than mental health professionals

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    6. Re:Suicide nets by SleazyRidr · · Score: 2

      Because we care more about getting cheap crap from Walmart than we do about a bunch of factory workers on the other side of the world.

    7. Re:Suicide nets by blair1q · · Score: 1

      It was a deal that W cut when he went to China.

      They buy our debt (most particularly our wartime debt) and we let them have free run of the American economy, and all the jobs they can swallow with little tariff on outsourced pay.

      I believe that's why China's stock market is taking it in the pants since bin Laden was capped. The war is going to wind down, and with it the war spending, and with that our need to sell bonds in mass quantities, and with that our need to keep the Chinese happy and wealthy, and with that our willingness to let China have free run of the American economy.

      It'll be interesting to watch.

    8. Re:Suicide nets by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Because it's cheap as hell. Do you investigate the working conditions at the manufacturer for every product you buy? How about your toothbrush? Your underwear? Your ballpoint pen?

      Well I do take notice of where things are manufactured. I have a basic understanding that places like China tend to use bad labour practices and places like Taiwan, Korea and Thailand have good labour practices, comparatively.

      I avoid "made in China" when possible, do you?

      Thus I'll chose a Taiwanese made HTC phone over a Chinese made Apple phone.

      You're using the whole "guilt by association" thing to avoid admitting that you don't want to change your attitudes. Guilt by association does not stand up in a western court of law and it doesn't work here. Just because you're attitude is bad, does not make all our attitudes bad.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    9. Re:Suicide nets by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Which exactly makes you (or whoever the collective "we" is referring to) a major part of the problem.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    10. Re:Suicide nets by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Some of us at least try not to.

      "Made in China" is synonymous with "Do not buy" in most cases.

      Unfortunately it's not so easy to apply this to electronics products at this stage.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    11. Re:Suicide nets by rubycodez · · Score: 2

      the initial deal was cut by Jimmy Carter, we snubbed Taiwan to do it.

    12. Re:Suicide nets by shentino · · Score: 1

      Because it's cheap as hell, we're capitalist bastards, and we don't give a FUCK about human rights.

      And also, because our competitors don't either.

    13. Re:Suicide nets by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      If you have to put up suicide nets and make people sign contracts promising not to kill themself then you're doing it wrong.

      You are an idiot, and so are the five people marking this as "insightful".

      Suicides are not committed by people who are thinking rationally about their situation. Of all people jumping off a high roof to commit suicide, most think "Oh shit, I think I made a _big_ mistake here" before they hit the ground. If you put up nets, they will think "what's that? It is a net! I am safe!" before they hit the net, which is hopefully constructed carefully to catch them without killing them. Or they think "here I am, trying to commit suicide, and the fuckers put a fucking net up! I'll show them, I'll climb down and beat the shit out of whoever is responsible for that net!". And by the time they climb down, they feel a lot better. (Read Niven/Pournelle "Oath of fealty").

    14. Re:Suicide nets by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Just think about the Chinese workers who have to actually make the suicide nets, now that's depressing...

    15. Re:Suicide nets by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Because hipsters need their iPhones so they can tweet about how America is destroying the planet.

      If I may riff on your comment:

      Because hipsters need their iPhones so they can tweet about how horribly Foxconn treats their employees.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    16. Re:Suicide nets by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Carter didn't cut the outsourcing tax on payrolls.

      W cut it from something like 30% to something like 6%.

      That giant sucking sound you heard was the entire Internet economy being moved to China and India. A trillion dollars of investment in jobs for Americans, and we just handed it all over to the enemy.

    17. Re:Suicide nets by mgiuca · · Score: 1

      Maybe manufacturers should be required by law to write "Made with Slave Labor" on the package (or similar wording). After all, egg cartons are required by law to include "Cage Eggs" if they were laid under abusive conditions, and this creates a market for the more expensive "Free Range Eggs" cartons. Why should we not protect humans with similar laws? Then we'll see how it affects sales of the more expensive brands that are made in countries with proper working conditions.

      Then again, they do contain the wording "Made in China"; perhaps that has the same meaning. But not the same ring to it.

  16. Bravo! by Lysander7 · · Score: 1

    Way to avoid addressing the underlying problem.

    1. Re:Bravo! by The+Man · · Score: 2

      Way to avoid addressing the underlying problem.

      It's not under their control. If they start treating their employees better, their costs will rise and they will either lose money or have to bid higher, in which case they'll lose contracts (and lose money). CM is a very competitive business, and Foxconn as a Taiwanese company is already at a disadvantage in some ways relative to mainland CMs.

      There are several ways this can play itself out. The employees can unionise (which on the mainland will require overthrowing or radically reforming the government) and demand better wages across the entire industry. In that case, two things will happen. First, prices of finished goods will rise. Second, these companies will begin investing in places where unions aren't allowed (race to the bottom). Third, unemployment in places with unions will rise, encouraging the creation of non-union shops where standards are lower.

      Another way this can play itself out is if the people who buy these goods start demanding verifiable standards of treatment for the people who manufacture them. This would have to be backed up with a willingness to (a) not buy products that fail to meet the standards, AND (b) pay much higher than current prices for them. This is unlikely because people in most developed countries are already living beyond their means and cannot afford to pay more.

      We've seen all of this before. Some combination of these things will in fact happen, as they did in today's developed countries. Ultimately, unionised manufacturing workforces are not competitive and will die out, leaving these low-value activities to be moved to whatever country does the most to ensure that labour is cheap. This is nothing more complicated than Ricardian comparative advantage. As this happens, the more developed countries will find that their unemployed union workers' children look for higher-value work to do and shift their economy from low-value manufacturing to higher-value engineering and services. Meanwhile, those in the third phase (debt collapse) will be forced to rejuvenate their own "old economy" sectors and become more competitive with the rising economies. This will mean a diminution of lifestyle as they pay down debt and accept lower-paying jobs in which their products are competitive.

      This is best viewed as a wave moving around the planet from east to west. Where the United States was in the 19th century, China is today. Where the United States is today, China will be in the 22nd century. None of this is new. None of it is surprising. It's just basic economics. While it may seem reprehensible to those of us with a recent cultural history of moral outrage with this sort of behaviour, the "robber barons" of 19th century America were no different. In time the Chinese will develop their own moral outrage for it, and put a stop to it. But doing so externally is all but impossible, because it requires fighting economics. Simply put, people will stop being treated this way when they start refusing to be treated this way even if it means not having a job. Happened before, will happen again.

  17. All bets are off! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Remember, this is China. The deck is stacked against the common man. The courts probably would enforce a contract that would be unenforceable in Western countries.

    1. Re:All bets are off! by kaatochacha · · Score: 2

      I bet if I was to post a story about Wine Tasting in France, Someone could change it into a "USA=TERRIBLE" post.

    2. Re:All bets are off! by losfromla · · Score: 2

      Scary how true it is, ain't it?

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    3. Re:All bets are off! by Moryath · · Score: 1

      Haven't you heard?

      The US Supreme Court just ruled that "unconscionable contract" provisions in state laws are null and void.

      The difference between the US and China is fading fast. The only difference is the Chinese call their system "Communism" when it's really an oligarchy run by a few giant corporations, while the US call their system "Capitalism" and it's really an oligarchy run by a few giant corporations.

    4. Re:All bets are off! by aquila.solo · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you're right. But I think in that particular instance it would come by way of a "US ALCOHOL == PISS" post.

    5. Re:All bets are off! by AK+Marc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's massive differences. For one, the Communists used their political power to gain economic power. And in the US, the Capitalists used their economic power to gain political power. They are like complete opposites. Or would be, if we could tell them apart.

    6. Re:All bets are off! by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Actually, there's some pretty big differences from what I can tell.

      The USA calls itself "capitalist", which may or may not be true (after all, corporations operate using privately-owned capital), but a more accurate term is "fascist", as the government is in the pockets of the corporations. There are not many state-owned corporations, however; the power only goes one way: the corporate puppets in government do the bidding of their masters, and that's it. Basically, the US government is thoroughly corrupt, just like Mexico's.

      In China, it's kinda the opposite: the most power is in the government, not the corporations. Lots of companies are state-owned, and lots more are partially state-owned or controlled. In China, if a corporate executive gets out of hand, or does something that pisses off the government (like getting caught adding melamine to food), he is taken to a ditch and his head is blown off. This NEVER happens in America, because the power is in the corporations' hands. If they do anything really bad, they get a slap on the wrist for show, pay a small fine, and continue with their misdeeds. Look at BP after all, or Enron, the banks, etc.

      The other big difference is how people gain power. In the USA, we still have elections; however, it's a complete farce as only the worst sociopaths are able to lie enough to get the most votes, before they take office and start serving their corporate masters. So things are in effect really decided by the stupidity of the voters. In China, there is no voting, as it's an authoritarian government, so they don't have to worry about placating the voters, except to keep them from rioting too much. For this reason, I'd say things are probably a lot more honest over there.

    7. Re:All bets are off! by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

      In China, there is no voting, as it's an authoritarian government, so they don't have to worry about placating the voters, except to keep them from rioting too much. For this reason, I'd say things are probably a lot more honest over there.

      ...yet things were pretty scary during the Bush/Cheney years - "Freedom of speech zones"? Yes, China and the US' economy/government power balances are almost perfect opposites, but they are both headed towards a common middle ground: the merging of economy (corporation) and state.

      I can't remember the name of the (horrible) movie I was watching, but it began with a description of a war between the North American and Eurasian corporations. I don't think I even finished the film, but that scenario really rang a bell.

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
    8. Re:All bets are off! by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up +1: Captain Sensible

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    9. Re:All bets are off! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Try re-watching Schwarzenegger's "The Running Man". Aside from the 80s campiness, it's scary how similar it is to modern-day events: government fabrications, corporatism, population distracted by reality TV, etc.

    10. Re:All bets are off! by pyrr · · Score: 1

      Actually, they are worlds apart, and anyone with even a little sense can see the differences.

      Under capitalism, money talks. Everyone is technically free to determine their own value (i.e., the value of their time) and refuse to work for less. Or refuse to work at all, though that decision can have unfavorable consequences. In practice, there are of course more practical considerations (such as needing to make enough money to buy food and shelter), but the concept of labor unions is inherently capitalist because they consist of workers banding together to demand their fair market value. It's an inherently oppositional system, with the burden of determining one's worth placed on each individual, and each individual has to fight for what his or her time is worth on the market, because everyone who wants to hire them is going to be trying to haggle the compensation down. There is always a risk of pricing a product out of the range of the market, or labor pricing itself out of being able to get a job, but such things are easily remedied by adapting to the market.

      Under socialism, you're worth what the government decides you're worth. If the government says your labor is worth the equivalent of $1 per day and your career will be to work in the slaughterhouse, that's simply your place, and if you protest, you'll probably find yourself on the train to the Siberian gulag for "re-education". Of course, privately owned businesses are an anathema, because they would lead to competition, which is problematic for a command economy. There can be no competition either amongst the labor force or production. You can have any car you want as long as it's a Trabant, and you will wait years to take delivery after placing your order, because the factory operates on the number of laborers the government decides it operates on. This also means that workers are never permitted to demand anything, not safer working conditions, not more compensation. Labor unions are never tolerated under a socialist state, unless they're simply a device to celebrate the Workers' Paradise that the government has created for the collective good.

      So here's where the obvious difference is: While both capitalism and socialism can suck for workers at some level, capitalist societies ALWAYS rise above the abuses of industrial revolutions, while socialist societies NEVER do. It's a natural process of the rising tide of free money, it's not like the USA was anything special, or the USSR & China were failed aberrations of socialism. Capitalism is reliant on choice, which means that workers do have the ability to gain political power even if they don't hold the bulk of the economic power. Socialism demands that the government makes the choices for everyone, which means that only the cultural elites ever have any power, be it economic or political.

      Unfortunately for us (but not necessarily a bad thing!), workers demanding more seems to have made industry in the USA largely go away overseas, where workers have yet to realize their value. Those in the labor force in the USA were virtual slaves for a while, the government and businesses tried to convince workers they were slaves and refused to recognize collective bargaining, but in the end, the workers did realize they were not slaves and that they have value and they stood-up for it, and made the reforms such as safer working conditions happen. The same thing will happen in China if we're just patient and continue to encourage them to subvert themselves with the weird pseudo-capitalism they think they're allowing now. It'll become real capitalism soon enough, and that will empower the workers to demand even more rights.

    11. Re:All bets are off! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I disagree. The votes are indeed counted, and are used to determine who each state's electors vote for. The problem you have is that you think everyone's vote should count equally, no matter if they're from Wyoming or California. The nation's founders thought differently (mind you, I don't really agree with them, but that's the way it is). That's why they designed the Electoral College system, to give an advantage to smaller states in deciding the President. The system works exactly as designed. It's not just in 2000 that it "threw" an election; IIRC it happened back in the 1800s too. Again, this is by design, not accident. But it doesn't mean your vote "doesn't count", it just counts less if you're in a highly-populated state, and it counts more if you live in a sparsely-populated state. But even so, California and Texas have lots of Electors, so if CA or TX becomes like FL was in 2000, where there was a tiny number of votes deciding the outcome for that state, your vote could conceivably throw the election for your state, and then the country. It's just not as likely as if you lived in WY. And yes, you're right, CA and TX are not likely to be swing states at all, unlike FL. But you never know, that could change. There's tons of hispanics in TX these days, and Obama's pushing for amnesty for anyone that wants to come across the border and vote. And CA did elect a Republican governator.

      So lay off the "mathematical aberrations" BS. There's no aberrations at all; there only seem to be to people who think one person should equal one vote. The system was absolutely designed to not be that way. Complaining about "mathematical aberrations" in the Electoral College system is like complaining that Cessnas and 747s are very inefficient ground vehicles, even though they can travel on the ground. You may not like it, I don't really like it either, but don't point out design features as flaws when they're not, they're just not what you'd prefer. It's like complaining that China's political process doesn't represent voters well; no shit, they don't even have elections! They do it that way for a reason, even if you don't like the reasons.

    12. Re:All bets are off! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Under capitalism, money talks. Everyone is technically free to determine their own value (i.e., the value of their time) and refuse to work for less.

      So in Capitalism, you get to set your worth, and if it isn't "market" value, you can either choose to work for less or not work, but if you set your value too high, no one will employ you.

      Under socialism, you're worth what the government decides you're worth.

      So in Socialism, you get to set your worth, and if it isn't "government" value, you can either choose to work for less or not work, but if you set your value too high, no one will employ you.

      I understand that there are differences between the two. But there are more similarities than differences.

      While both capitalism and socialism can suck for workers at some level, capitalist societies ALWAYS rise above the abuses of industrial revolutions, while socialist societies NEVER do.

      So your one and only one difference is that both are identical at the time of comparison, but you can look back and see later which was which based on revisionist history? And either way, what you say doesn't seem to work well for describing Russia. Are you arguing that they weren't ever socialist because they are now capitalist? Because "never" means that if they are over the abuses (yes, a stretch, but if you don't think they are over it now, assume they will be sometime) then they couldn't have ever been socialist.

      Unfortunately for us (but not necessarily a bad thing!), workers demanding more seems to have made industry in the USA largely go away overseas, where workers have yet to realize their value

      The workers realize their current value. They have the choice of "low" or "zero" for their value. And the practices in China are not any different than how Korea got to where it is, with China lagging slightly. The fact one is purportedly capitalist and the other purportedly socialist hasn't changed the evolution of the industry and workers in each. So again, I don't see the difference. It isn't the socialism that's keeping the workers down in China, it's the capitalism, and the capitalism says "lots of workers, few jobs, low standard of living, so the workers are cheap and expendable." That's what capitalism says the world round. So to assert that such issues that capitalism has faced many many times are somehow the fault of socialism in China and only China seems silly.

  18. The penalty for violating the pledge is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Death.

  19. Statistically insignificant by Drunkulus · · Score: 1, Informative

    Many countries have higher rates of suicide among the general population.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_suicide_rate

    1. Re:Statistically insignificant by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      There's more to it than just the raw per capita number. You need to look at statistics on a much more granular demographic level. For instance, Dentists have a significantly higher suicide rate than the general population in the US. China has a largely agrarian population at the moment, and historically, people living in a rural area, and with rural occupations like farming, have a much lower suicide rate than people living in cities, even in the western world. Your guess is as good as mine as to why, but I would guess it's because rural living tends to be much lower stress, and because you get much more fresh air and time outside.

      What's the suicide rate among employees of manufacturing plants in China, and how does Foxconn compare against the average? The impression we're getting from the press is that Foxconn is well above average, but we truthfully don't know, and can't know, because that kind of statistic isn't made public. We simply don't know if other Chinese manufacturers are having the same kind of suicide rate as Foxconn appears to be, or not.

    2. Re:Statistically insignificant by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      While true, I don't think that's a good way to compare it. How many of those who killed themselves here did for, say, not having a job and enough debt to weigh down another ten people?

      Also, we're talking about a different culture. I honestly don't know much about Chinese culture, but I know that there are countries with barely measurable suicide rates because it's considered a big disgrace to off yourself. If you want to compare it, compare it to the average suicide rates in China.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Statistically insignificant by Drunkulus · · Score: 1

      Of course. TFA might as well argue that the Golden Gate Bridge is such a terrible bridge that people crossing it commit suicide.

    4. Re:Statistically insignificant by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      let's face it... China has 1.3 Billion people so you're 4x less important there than in the USA. It's not much to get to the point where the average well paid (and the foxconn folks are fairly well paid compared to other Chinese factories) realizes they're just a cog and they've got it "as good as it's gonna get". Life is hard and then you die... a logical person would realize they'd avoid pain and get to the dead part sooner.

  20. Sucide rate? by asdbffg · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Wired article a published a month or two ago claims that the suicide rate at American colleges is higher than at Foxconn. According to Wikipedia, the suicide rate per 100,000 persons in the US is 11.1, and according to the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, there are between 8 and 25 suicide attempts for every reported suicide death. That gives us an attempted suicide rate of around 88 or 89 per 100,000 people.

    Looking at the information on Foxconn in the linked article, it would appear that the attempted suicide rate is somewhere around 12 per 100,000 for the first part of 2010. That would come out to maybe 36 per 100,000 for the whole year?

    Maybe the headline should be: Making iPads in a Chinese Factory Is Truly Awful, But You're Much More Likely to Kill Yourself if You go to College in the US.

    Unless I'm missing something here. Also, the article appears to be pretty old.

    1. Re:Sucide rate? by sandytaru · · Score: 2

      Most of the depression in workers has less to do with their employment conditions and more to do with dying hopes and dreams. The factory workers probably didn't get a college scholarship. They came from the countryside with great plans to earn enough money to go to college on their own, to have money to send home to their families, and to live a nice modern life in the city. Instead they find themselves in a factory job with incredibly strict standards, making just enough money to survive in the city (which costs more to live in already) with no money for college OR to send home to mom and dad. It is this crushing reality that causes depression, not necessarily the 12 hour days (which many workers in the US also endure.)

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    2. Re:Sucide rate? by operagost · · Score: 2

      The fact that China doesn't have a free press, therefore their numbers are incredibly unreliable?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    3. Re:Sucide rate? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      "American colleges" is not something you can sue, or a brand you will boycott over a social issue.

      "Foxconn" is.

    4. Re:Sucide rate? by retroworks · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You are pretty much right. The Foxconn factory in Shenzhen has about 450,000 employees (more than in press accounts). There are grocery stores, restaurants, schools, hospitals, etc. inside the campus. The article and header is therefore rather misleading, it's like a small city, with a small city's suicide rate. The tasks are hand assembly, the jobs the USA press is upset about losing. I'm not sure I'd be cut out for that. The actual name of the company is Hon Hai Precision Industry Co Ltd, the factory assembles for a LOT of companies, not just Apple. Expect them to come out with their own brands soon - following Acer (of Wistron) and Lenovo, they are going to outgrow being contract manufacturers and then maybe they'll make more money to pay their employees.

      --
      Gently reply
    5. Re:Sucide rate? by asdbffg · · Score: 1

      The suicide rate for 15-24 year olds in the US was still 10.0 per 100,000 in 2005, giving us a conservative estimate of 80 attempts per 100,000 persons.

    6. Re:Sucide rate? by stephentyrone · · Score: 1

      The Wired article a published a month or two ago claims that the suicide rate at American colleges is higher than at Foxconn.

      You are missing something: The suicide rates for the US which you're quoting are for entire lifetimes (the Americans had up to 70 years or so to decide to commit suicide)

      What portion of the college-age population is over 70?

    7. Re:Sucide rate? by X.25 · · Score: 1

      The Wired article a published a month or two ago claims that the suicide rate at American colleges is higher than at Foxconn. According to Wikipedia, the suicide rate per 100,000 persons in the US is 11.1, and according to the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, there are between 8 and 25 suicide attempts for every reported suicide death. That gives us an attempted suicide rate of around 88 or 89 per 100,000 people.

      Looking at the information on Foxconn in the linked article, it would appear that the attempted suicide rate is somewhere around 12 per 100,000 for the first part of 2010. That would come out to maybe 36 per 100,000 for the whole year?

      Maybe the headline should be: Making iPads in a Chinese Factory Is Truly Awful, But You're Much More Likely to Kill Yourself if You go to College in the US.

      You are comparing a college with Foxconn?

      You probably don't see any flaws there, do you?

    8. Re:Sucide rate? by sjames · · Score: 1

      What you're missing is that the Foxconn figure is just those killing themselves at work. Admittedly, that appears to be the majority of their lives, but still, it's not a total figure.

    9. Re:Sucide rate? by konekoniku · · Score: 1

      This is precisely spot on. I've followed the story since it's inception and am not convinced. First, Foxconn employs nearly a million people in China. Statistically, the fact that they've only had 20-30 suicides so far is actually impressive.

      Second, one significant cause for the rash of suicides was that Foxconn, acting under pressure from Apple, actually compensated the first suicidee's family with an enormous compensation package, equal to 5-10 years worth of wages. Shortly thereafter, twelve more workers committed suicide, with one of them leaving behind a suicide note to his family along the lines of "at least now, with the money you will be able to live well and be happy".

      I think two lessons follow from this. First, the press should always be treated with a degree of skepticism. Second, compensating the families of suicide victims has negative secondary consequences that must be considered.

  21. Re:Right... by proverbialcow · · Score: 2

    They could threaten to kill themselves if forced to sign it. If they were clever about it, they could use it as leverage to force better conditions in the work place. That is assuming it wouldn't be cheaper for Foxconn to just hire a whole new staff. Deadlines may not make that possible though for Foxconn.

    I doubt that would work.

    FC Manager: Sign this pact that you won't commit suicide.
    Employee: No. If you try to make me, I'll commit suicide.
    FC Manager: You're fired. Get out.

    FC Spokesperson: We are deeply saddened to learn that former employee #1785598 took his own life yesterday. He had a history of erratic behavior, even threatening to commit suicide at one point to his manager. In that same conversation, the manager tried to make him promise he would not take his own life, but sadly, was unable to reach him. Toodles!

    --
    The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
  22. Re:Hi, welcome to the Duke lacrosse team by cpu6502 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Dear misinformed:

    The Duke lacrosse team did not rape anybody. It was a false accusation and a prime example of how "presume guilt and punish immediately" is a bad idea. The falsely-accused students are now filing lawsuits for damages (like not being able to compete and reach professional level status). Plus a general level of HATE directed by professors to the students. (I always thought profs were secretly bastards at heart.)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Responses_to_the_2006_Duke_University_lacrosse_case#Duke_faculty_groups

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  23. Cause of death?: by Hartree · · Score: 1

    So, the families can only claim minimum damages if it's suicide?

    Look for even the most aggregious workplace injuries and deaths to be found to be suicide or attempted suicide.

    "She committed suicide by walking into the freezer and then padlocking herself in from the outside."

    1. Re:Cause of death?: by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, at least they can keep the work related accidents at an all time low now! You see, he didn't break through the rotten ladder. He committed suicide.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  24. Apple also likes to sell their stuff as special by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They are very annoyed that they have to admit their products are built elsewhere. If you take a look on any device it'll always say where it was made or assembled. That is required by law. Almost all devices, that's all it says about that. However Apple stuff? Right before that they have to note "Designed in California by Apple." Reason is they want to try and deflect from the "Made in China" part. They don't want their Mac to be just another thing made in China.

    Well, that makes the stories particularly juicy to the press when they relate to Apple and China. Most companies aren't bothered. They stamp the country of assembly on the box and call it good. So calling them out on it does nothing. You call out MSI on their motherboards being made in China and they'll say "Ummm yes, yes they are. Says so right on the board."

    Also there's the fact that it seems Apple puts additional secrecy pressure on Foxconn and that their employees have been subject to additional restrictions and scrutiny due to Apple leaks. You don't see that with other products Foxconn makes. They don't have to keep everything super secret since companies don't put on the big show and their products are usually known well in advance of launch.

    1. Re:Apple also likes to sell their stuff as special by should_be_linear · · Score: 1

      Because their prices are more like "Made in USA" rather then "Designed in California". Given that assembling iGear can involve at most 10.000 people in state-of-the-art highly automated factories, "Made in China" it is only explainable by _greed_.

      --
      839*929
    2. Re:Apple also likes to sell their stuff as special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You don't understand! Chinese manufacturers is what drives Apple's products prices down!


      Oh, wait...

    3. Re:Apple also likes to sell their stuff as special by getNewNickName · · Score: 1

      They are very annoyed that they have to admit their products are built elsewhere. If you take a look on any device it'll always say where it was made or assembled. That is required by law. Almost all devices, that's all it says about that. However Apple stuff? Right before that they have to note "Designed in California by Apple." Reason is they want to try and deflect from the "Made in China" part. They don't want their Mac to be just another thing made in China.

      My iPhone says "Design in California by Apple" and in the very next sentence it says "Assembled in China". I don't see how that deflects any information whatsoever. I could just as easily suggest that Apple is proud that their products are designed in America instead of outsourced to a foreign country.

    4. Re:Apple also likes to sell their stuff as special by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Why does it seem that nobody gets it. It's not the wages. If the wage was $0 in the USA, it would be cheaper to make it in China and ship it to the US than to make it in California. Sure, the companies like that the wages are low, but the wages are incidental to the cost of some of the other parts of the process. Most specifically, operating under the EPA costs the US companies lots of money. They aren't allowed to pump toxic waste straight into the nearest body of water. And OSHA requires a safe environment, even if you aren't paying your employees any wages. They aren't bad regulations. But the regulations on manufacturing in the US are more onerous than the wages. And the only solution is to raise tariffs on foreign goods to approximate the externalized costs to US levels. But that will never happen. If wages alone were the driving factor, we'd be making stuff in Africa. Instead, we'll get around to exploiting them when the costs of doing business in China get to high.

    5. Re:Apple also likes to sell their stuff as special by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      But design isn't what gets outsourced. Something being designed in America is nothing new at all. Most American companies design their shit in America. If they didn't, well they probably wouldn't be American companies. However a lot of manufacturing has moved out, particularly for consumer electronics. My monitor was made in China, my receiver was made in Japan, my TV was made in Mexico, etc.

      None of it bothers to say where it was designed (actually Japan in the first two cases, Korea in the last). The only reason it says where it was made is because the law requires that. It does not require you to say where it was designed.

      Apple is quite unique in the saying where it was designed. Hell even many products that are mainly built in the US, but assembled elsewhere don't bother to say anything like that. My Intel CPU just says Costa Rica, since that's where it was packaged and thus "made" under the law. Now the complex work, the fabbing, was done in the US at Fab 32 in Arizona. However they don't list that because it isn't required, they just list Costa Rica since that is the final assembly point and what the law requires be put on there.

      To me, it just smacks of deflection from Apple. They can't remove the "Made in China" part by law, so they stamp the "Designed in California," on it to try and deflect.

    6. Re:Apple also likes to sell their stuff as special by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      There was an programme on Japanese TV about products claiming to be "made in Japan" a couple of years ago. They took a Sony PVR apart and discovered a Samsung HDD (South Korea) and a motherboard made in China. Some parts were soldered in Japan and final assembly done there, but that is all the "made in" tag tells you.

      The law allowing that was probably written when the chemicals used in manufacture came from one country but the main work was done in another. Nowadays a HDD might be a line item on the list of parts but is in fact itself a complex device that the consumer may wish to know the origin of.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Apple also likes to sell their stuff as special by CompMD · · Score: 1

      Our company actually used to stamp "Designed in USA, Made in Taiwan" on our products. However, we own our manufacturing facility in Taiwan. While we still design in the USA and manufacture in Taiwan, we only have "Made in Taiwan" on our products today, which I find slightly disappointing.

    8. Re:Apple also likes to sell their stuff as special by getNewNickName · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that the Pentium M CPU, which the latest Intel Core machines are based on, was designed in Israel.

  25. Re:Profits before people by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

    So what brand do you buy that doesn't use Foxconn, or similar worker-enslaving Corporation? (Oh that's right. No such computer manufacturer exists. So you're a hypocrite who won't buy Apple but will happily buy HP or Dell or other computer that's just as bad.)

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  26. Re:All I have to say is... by Time_Ngler · · Score: 1

    Prices are set to maximise profits based on what the market will bear; the extra cost of providing decent manufacturing conditions would have a negligible impact (if any) on end-user pricing.

    The impact depends on how much of a commodity it is. If manufacturers of competing products use the same low cost techniques for producing their goods, this will bring the prices down due to, well, competition.

  27. Re:Right... by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

    FC Spokesperson and Manager: Ahhhhh!

    (after being shot in heart by revolting employees)

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  28. Re:Right... by operagost · · Score: 1

    Why, execution of course!

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  29. Slave Labor by GruntboyX · · Score: 1

    It so bothers me to see the level of work conditions that these people endure. Sent from my Ipad

  30. Re:forced by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Sign this Pledge not to commit suicide."
    "No."
    "I said, sign it! Or Else!"
    "Or else what? You going to kill me for not signing a pledge that says I won't do it myself?"

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  31. Re:Right... by TheSpoom · · Score: 2

    Employees: Ahhhh!

    (after being shot in the neck by the Chinese army)

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  32. They've got nets outside the dorms by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    there's your enforcement. It's surprisingly hard to kill a human being when they don't have access to guns or tall buildings...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:They've got nets outside the dorms by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 1

      They have clothes, hands and things to hang ropes from. They could probably find ways in the factory to kill themselves. I'm sure enough of them use sharp instruments. Not to mention simply eating a few batteries.

      --
      Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
    2. Re:They've got nets outside the dorms by RobDude · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you are joking right?

      I think it would be very easy to kill yourself without those things.

    3. Re:They've got nets outside the dorms by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      there's your enforcement. It's surprisingly hard to kill a human being when they don't have access to guns or tall buildings...

      ...and yet a cheap plastic bag would be just as effective, and wouldn't cost as much.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    4. Re:They've got nets outside the dorms by syousef · · Score: 1

      there's your enforcement. It's surprisingly hard to kill a human being when they don't have access to guns or tall buildings...

      It's surprisingly easy to kill yourself if you're sufficiently motivated. Even padded cells are sometimes not enough. Clearly you've never considered suicide in any detail. This is not necessarily a bad thing. (I'm not saying I have either).

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    5. Re:They've got nets outside the dorms by shish · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how effective that would be though -- With guns, knives, tall buildings, etc, you decide in a fraction of a second and then there's no going back. With self-suffocation, you really need to stick with it for a few minutes at least, and you need to make sure that you continue to suffocate after you pass out. If the bag falls off after passing out but before death, then you just end up with brain damage...

      --
      I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
    6. Re:They've got nets outside the dorms by microphobe · · Score: 1

      I've known of cases where people have hung themselves with socks, like life and love, death will find a way.

      --
      YES, dammit.. I am well aware of the irony.
    7. Re:They've got nets outside the dorms by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      no, human body is very fragile. People with arms and legs bound and being tortured have committed suicide by biting their own tongue off and bleeding to death.

  33. Not evil by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A corporation exists to maximize profit. So if you're going to anthropomorphize a company it's not evil, it just doesn't care about evil.

    So the proper term would be sociopathic.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  34. Don't you have to be of sound mind.... by mark-t · · Score: 1
    IANAL, but don't you have to be of sound mind to sign a contract? And is it not generally accepted that a person who has been driven to suicide is *not* of a sound mind, and therefore the contract is invalid?

    I dunno... something doesn't seem right about this.

  35. the statistic is meaningless by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

    12 people killed themselves over a period of 16 months? Out of how many people? Without knowing that, it's a meaningless number.

    1. Re:the statistic is meaningless by fibonacci8 · · Score: 2

      It was out of 8 people, that's why they're concerned.

      --
      Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
    2. Re:the statistic is meaningless by retchdog · · Score: 1

      TFA says 500k employees. although probably they are not all at uniform risk (certain jobs suck more), it's a decent starting point.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  36. This makes "Made in the USA" feel good... by silly_sysiphus · · Score: 1

    Granted, it's inescapable to have all my devices' components China-free, but I can't help feeling smug about my Samsung phone (Korea), IBM laptop (USA), and HP calculator (USA).

    1. Re:This makes "Made in the USA" feel good... by trapnest · · Score: 2

      IBM makes stuff in the US?

    2. Re:This makes "Made in the USA" feel good... by silly_sysiphus · · Score: 1

      Not any longer, no. But up through the R52/T43 Thinkpads, there was limited US production.

  37. Re:(Foxconn != Apple) != (Apple = Good Guys) by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but Foxconn's other clients aren't as newsworthy. Logitech and Dell aren't big enough names to warrant a mention. It is not a conspiracy against your cult. And if it were, "But other companies do business with Foxconn tooooooo!" is not an excuse, m'kay? Apple does business with a company that works its slaves until they die, end of story.

    When you fixate on Apple and not on the other companies doing business with Foxconn it means you don't really care at all about the workers. "End of Story".

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  38. Typical Chinese solution by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

    In China, businesses are often obsessed with obtaining certifications. ISO9001, UL, CE, human rights guarantee, eco-certification, whatever it is, they want it, and they have been trained by foreign buyers that certifications are Important.

    Of course, they aren't particularly concerned with fulfilling the conditions to get the certification - which is entirely the point of certification in the first place, but they don't see it that way. The end result is all that matters. This "pledge" is an entirely rational (by Chinese standards) reply to the avalanche of bad publicity (perpetrated by journalists with an axe to grind). Seriously, the "Apple suicides" were just one of those non-stories the press just runs with...remember it was shark attacks during 2004-05? Anyway, to all of you internet geniuses chortling to yourselves saying "how they gonna enforce it LOL"...that's not the point. They now have a piece of paper they can show..."see, we solved the problem!" They've been trained that this fixes things where foreigners are involved.

    Two stories, a Chinese friend of mine recently had a large order for promotional items from the UK. However, there was some restriction that said the factory had to pledge itself to enforce some bit of leftist dogma. Ten cartons of Zhonghua cigarettes later, and the proper certificate was produced and the buyer was none the wiser. This next one is one of my favorite stories, heard it when I first came to China. Buddy of mine is buying sunglasses from some factory. He asks, do they have UV coating? Evidently there's some problem translating ultraviolet into Chinese so the factory owner doesn't understand. They go back and forth for a while without getting anywhere. Then suddenly, the guy's face lights up and he says, "Oh ya ya ya ya I know I know! We have sticker!" True story.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  39. Not in America! by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 1

    No problem here. Suicide wipes away liabilities from employers, insurers, even the governments. Here, we just RIF them; though having employees kill themselves might be cheaper than firing them. We need to consult the Japanese on that one.

  40. Great Plot Idea for Crime Movie by AioKits · · Score: 1

    Where there is a rash of murders at Foxconn designed to look like suicides of people potentially leaking the next iSomething design!

    --
    "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
  41. Wow! I need new glasses by Sooner+Boomer · · Score: 1
    Read the parent post, my eyes crossed for a second, and what I read was

    "But Apple's user base is primarily vegetables."

    --
    Chaos maximizes locally around me.
  42. We could send over some of out Evangelists. by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 1

    "Sacom said the company initially responded to the spate of suicides by bringing in monks to exorcise evil spirits"

    Obviously since it is the iPhone and iPad they probably are using the wrong kind of exorcists. Maybe we can share some of our Hell and Damnation Bible thumpers to strainghten out those pesky spirits. Or maybe they should have sent the monks to the executive offices instead of the factory?

  43. Sensationalist Reporting!! by quatin · · Score: 2

    I'm not amazed that this would come out of the dailymail, but I am amazed so many slashdotters are falling for it.
    I see the term slavery being thrown out there like Foxconn is raiding villages and making chain gangs.

    The people who work in these factories are often young migrants, leaving their homes to find better wages. They would seek out overtime hours so they can earn more money to send home or for their dream savings. They know it's tough work, but it's a much better wage than what they would otherwise get. Some people can't handle the stress from being away from home and working a tough factory shift.

    China is in that era of an industrial revolution. Family farms are becoming non-sustainable and the next generation is moving into the city to find work. Unskilled labor tend to end up in factories and the rapid life style change along with the isolation puts a lot of stress on these kids. I'm not saying Foxconn shouldn't relax their work policies, but the we're avoiding the true problem here.

  44. Re:Profits before people by Kahlandad · · Score: 1

    Sooo let me get this straight... Apple demands that it's suppliers treat their workers with a certain amount of respect and dignity, then performs its own investigation to make sure its suppliers are meeting this demands and finds that they are coming up short. Because of this, you've decided to boycott Apple's products. All the other tech companies in America don't give a rat's ass about how their suppliers treat their employees, but THAT'S ok with you?? You have a very odd set of morals...

  45. So do you feel guilty? by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    Do you all feel guilty for buying an ipad , iphone, or ipod?

  46. Ignoring the root causes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A "No Despair" pledge would be much more effective.

  47. Apple admits using subtle and precise child labour by David+Gerard · · Score: 1

    PROFESSOR JOBS' SCHOOL FOR GIFTED YOUNGSTERS, Shenzhen, Sunday (NTN) — In its annual supplier report, Apple has admitted that its Chinese factories have employed children to build its gadgets. "Ones with a particularly refined sense of aesthetics."

    Apple revealed the sweatshop conditions inside the factories it uses. The child workers were found in a facility with high vaulted ceilings, elegantly crafted marble work benches and a classical quartet playing in the background in a corner of the floor. Young geniuses sat in their Aerons and levitated components into place with the powers of the mind, burning the famed Apple logo into the back of the assembled device with but a glance of terrifying but controlled power. Some lunches, with only an hour's break, would involve wines of less than ten years' vintage.

    Competitors were outraged. "We are shocked, shocked to hear of Apple's ruthless exploitation of the chilll-drennn," said Steve Ballmer of Microsoft. "But then, what do you expect when they actually ask their suppliers about this stuff. Don't ask, don't tell! That's what made the 360 great!"

    Apple's Chinese manufacturing facilities were the site of controversy last year when one young worker at Foxconn, who had teleported an iPhone home overnight, was found to have committed suicide by leaping from the top of the building, first breaking his own neck, and tearing out all his own fingernails on the way down. He was found with Apple logos carved into his back, obviously also self-inflicted. "A tragedy," said the report.

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
  48. Re:forced by Missing.Matter · · Score: 1

    They would get away with it too, because obviously anyone who will not pledge to not commit suicide is suicidal.

  49. Re:Right... by demonbug · · Score: 1

    FC Spokesperson and Manager: Ahhhhh!

    (after being shot in heart by revolting employees)

    The employees are always revolting; this is a Rebellion!

  50. China needs unions by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    No, seriously. China is currently manufacturing like we were right after our industrial revolution. Complete control of the workforce by the industry, with little if any protection. Think of unions whatever you want, but they made possible what we consider today our living standard. And as long as it's cheaper to use manpower than to invent machines to do the task instead, innovation will not happen either. There is a reason why civilizations that relied on slave work (and let's be honest here, this isn't anything but that) never were amongst the innovators. In former days, this meant that sooner or later you were surpassed and beaten into a pulp by a civilization that invested in technology to replace (expensive) workforce by machinery.

    Sadly, that system doesn't work anymore because of international trade at a level unknown earlier. Also, the power of the industry is stronger than ever before, I'm not so sure we can consider ourselves democracies anymore, we're getting closer to a corporate state, where industry, not political or social interests, dictate the laws.

    A step in the right direction would be to tie import restrictions on the working conditions of the people who make the stuff you want to import. Want to import, make sure your workers are treated right. And by right I mean, at least get close to what we consider humane.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:China needs unions by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Yyyyup.

      And the corporatists response?

      "If you want to compete you have to get rid of the unions."

      Could be time to get out the pitchforks and brickbats.

    2. Re:China needs unions by danbuter · · Score: 1

      China is a worker's paradise. You'd think they would have strong unions.

    3. Re:China needs unions by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, they do, but they praise the direction it is taking and believe in the Party more than anything.

      Think of it as something like the bank supervision or antitrust board here.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:China needs unions by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Unlikely to happen in China. Maybe we should sneak some of our "values" there. Like getting rich, axing the boss for his job and the general idea that "gimme!" and "I'm entitled" is the mantra and key to happiness.

      Ya know, that great firewall ain't just to keep political ideas out...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:China needs unions by blair1q · · Score: 1

      In essence, if the Chinese are actually communists and/or socialists, the entire country is a union.

      But it appears it's one that's been corrupted by greed in its management ranks, and is using its central power to fuck the proletariat instead of protecting it from this sort of casual abuse of their human rights.

    6. Re:China needs unions by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Don't buy the shit that because they're "Communist" (I'll use the term loosely here, China is maybe a communist government on paper, but it has more and more hallmarks of a fascist government), that they have unions worth the name. No communist country, with the exception of Poland after Solidarnosc, had a Union that actually protected and defended the rights of the worker.

      Mostly because there hasn't been a single "real" communist government ever. Most were just simple dictatorships with a red flavor.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  51. Re:forced by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    "Sign this Pledge not to commit suicide."
    "No."
    "I said, sign it! Or Else!"
    "Or else what? You going to kill me for not signing a pledge that says I won't do it myself?"

    To which the bleeding obvious response is...
    "No, or else you'll get the sack and be turfed out of your company-provided accommodation".

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  52. And all that is without guns by Elyas · · Score: 1

    Guns are the easiest and most common way to commit suicide, falls account for only 2.5% of US suicides, where as guns are >50%. To have that high a suicide rate without access to the "best" method is even more frightening.

  53. Make it better, not worse! by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    If Foxconn would make a few concessions, or increase the quality of living even slightly, I bet the suicide rate would drop.

    People are not machines, and it's dumb to treat them like machines. This is not a problem that has no solution. There are many countless ways to improve morale. Foxconn doesn't have to be the worst company in order to deliver the products the fastest/cheapest. Somebody give the management an Anthony Robbins tape...

    1. Re:Make it better, not worse! by croddy · · Score: 1

      17 suicides out of a million employees is a shockingly low suicide rate. There are, of course, plenty of reasons to treat your employees right, other than merely discouraging them from killing themselves. Based on the available information, it seems that there is a lot Foxconn could do to improve morale and quality of living. I think it would be extremely foolish, however, to expect their suicide rate to ever fall below 0.0017 %.

  54. Re:Profits before people by trapnest · · Score: 1

    It's better than that. Because of Apple's rules, the Foxconn workers who make apple parts get treated better than the workers at the same factory that make dell parts. This isn't about the workers or foxconn, it's about hating apple for any irrational reason they can think of.

  55. Re:Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Immediate termination of course.

    Oh, wait. Let me rephrase that.

  56. Why the big fuss about suicides? by Romario77 · · Score: 2

    Suicides happen in all kind of economies, people get depressed, things happen in their lives, etc. - actually US suicide rate is higher then the China's (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_suicide_rate). And if you count that there are 900 000 people who work for Foxconn the fact that only 18 people in 2010 committed suicide says that the rate is much lower than the average. It is 11.1 per 100 000 in US and 6.6 per 100 000 in China. So, you could say Foxconn improves the suicide rate vs. the average in China. Yes, working conditions are not that good on the factories, but I don't think that suicide rate is a good indicator.

  57. Re:Right... by should_be_linear · · Score: 1

    iTunes for Windows on Ubuntu over wine!

    --
    839*929
  58. Re:What's the rate? by retchdog · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and if you really want to see some deplorable violations of human rights, just check out the suicide rate of MIT undergrads...

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  59. Irresponsible Article by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2

    I'm all for investigating abuses in Chinese labor and dealing with them, but tis article is counter-productive. First, it constantly refers to Foxconn only in relation to Apple, not mentioning the dozens of other corporations it supplies. It repeatedly refers to facilities run by "Apple's supplier" but doesn't mention if they were actual facilities that make things for Apple and which Apple audits yearly and openly publishes information about and what they found and what action they took. It mentions Apples audits in the phrase, "...but its[Apple] own audit reports suggest suppliers in China may not meet up to these standards." It does not mention the list of changes Apple required from various suppliers nor the numerous suppliers Apple fired outright for violating Apple's human rights policy.

    I find this article irresponsible because it is just heaping bad press on Apple (not the rest of the industry) when in truth Apple is the only company I have been able to find actually taking a stand and doing something about the problem. There is no mention of Asus, Sony, Intel, Acer, Nokia, etc. who are all supplied by Foxconn. Thus readers are misled into thinking Apple is the issue. All this article does is motivate Apple to stop publishing audits and stop all the good work they've been doing to remediate the labor problem. I'd like to be the first to throw a big "Fuck you!" to the Daily Mail for their irresponsible, slanted journalism.

    1. Re:Irresponsible Article by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      However, I also believe it is necessary to bring this shit to light no matter whose demand is being supplied under these conditions.

      Except, this article isn't "bringing it to light" it is obscuring what is going on by focusing only on Apple in a very misleading way. It is entirely probable some of the issues they mention are happening at plants making things for Sony(or some other company) because, Sony, unlike Apple has not stepped in to stop the practices. By referring to Foxconn only as an Apple supplier and not checking to see which company is funding the practices that are abhorrent, all that is happening is they are providing incentive to make things worse.

      If Apple has to eat shit for using virtual slave labor abroad SO BE IT!!!!

      That would be fine, if it were happening, but Apple is the one company that is not allowing them to use underage workers or make people work extreme numbers of hours. They're the one company that is actually investigating and firing suppliers for just those practices. But all that is obscured by the slanted reporting.

      If Apple deserved any white night status in all of this, it would only be because upon learning of these abuses, they moved all of their manufacturing base back here.

      They did at one point, or in a way. Jobs left Apple and founded Next which did all it's manufacturing in the US, not the third world. Unfortunately, people were not wiling to pay a premium for that and elected politicians who would not even enforce the antitrust laws on the books, so Next was purchased by Apple and went back to the status quo. So Apple does the only thing that they can to stay in business, prevent the abuses at the facilities they work with, using regular openly published audits and reports on what action they take in response to abuses. Sorry, but picking on the only company doing anything is really, really counter productive, and trying to spin what Foxconn does overall, not at plants making things for Apple, as though it was Apple's fault is likewise counter productive.

  60. Unobscure witticism: by synth7 · · Score: 2

    Somewhere Lazarus Long isn't rolling over in his grave.

  61. Re:(Foxconn != Apple) != (Apple = Good Guys) by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    No, it means I am trying to put pressure on the big fish, not the little fish.

    No, it means you're putting pressure on Apple instead of putting pressure on Foxcon.

    By making Apple look bad, I am helping the workers to negotiate.

    You're encouraging Apple to do business somewhere else. That won't help the workers. Since it's about Apple and not about Foxcon, you're not doing a whole lot to get them to soften their policies.

    By defending Apple as you do...

    I am not defending Apple. Singling them out doesn't help the workers.

    You are little better than a murderer yourself.

    I did not call you a murderer.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  62. Common therapy tool by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm not sure if it's effective to "force" them to sign the document but this is a common way to deal with suicidal individuals from a mental health perspective. You get people to sign a form, even just one you scribbled out right there, or give a verbal commitment to not kill themselves until the next time you see them, when you get the commitment again. It works for most people. Most people really don't want to kill themselves, they want to end pain or maybe even cause pain but few people who attempt suicide want to do it. They consider it because they believe it's their only realistic option for dealing with their problems. This is generally true in America, I don't know if it's the case in other parts of the world.

  63. Re:What's the rate? by paiute · · Score: 1

    If I'm reading the article correctly, there were 14 suicides in 4/3 years (16 months) from a 500,000 workers.

    From Wikipedia, the suicide rate in the United States is 11.1 suicides per year per 100,000 people. Which means 11.1 * 4/3 * 5 = 74 suicides would have occured over an average US population of the same size over the same time. By the same calculations the number of people from the People's Republic of China (with 6.6/year/100,000people) to commit suicide would be 44.

    I'm not saying at all that they way they are treated is right or that they're being paid enough or that it could be better. The fact that Apple and other companies would make it's items thousands of miles away from where they are consumed seems to mean something is out of balance.

    But 14 suicides doesn't seem to be an alarming rate at all from the numbers I'm looking at. And it's is significantly smaller than both 44 and 74. Someone please tell me where my logic is wrong. Is the statement of 500,000 employees correct the 14 suicides came from correct? Although again Foxconn's Wikipedia article lists 920,000+ (2010) employees.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_rate
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foxconn

    I read the same statistics. The title of the Wired article just as well could have been "Apple's iPad Saves Chinese Lives"

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  64. Why Worry by JameskPratt · · Score: 1

    Contract Later reads 'Don't bother killing yourself--the work and hazards will work to ensure you to see the Gods (or God) sooner than you think. :)'

  65. Re:forced by chuckugly · · Score: 1

    Which sort of points out something important about the job being pretty good by local standards.

  66. Re:(Foxconn != Apple) != (Apple = Good Guys) by spun · · Score: 1

    Ahhhh, nothing like trolling Apple fans. Come on, I called you guys a cult in my first post, then I called you a murderer. Do you think there are really people who think that way?

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  67. Not disagreeing on that by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

    Just saying that Apple's love for downplaying the China thing is why the media loves to jump on it. When you freely and openly admit to something, it isn't much of a story to the press because they can't make it a scandal. When you try and keep it more hush hush, they'll like it just because they are "revealing" something.

  68. Keep in mind... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ... the suicide rate at Foxconn is STILL lower than the overall suicide rate in China.

    Foxconn is a BIG company.

    http://www.zdnet.com/blog/foremski/media-gets-its-facts-wrong-working-at-foxconn-significantly-cuts-suicide-risk/1356

  69. The beatings will continue... by starfishsystems · · Score: 1

    ...until morale improves.

    --
    Parity: What to do when the weekend comes.
  70. Fun Job by b4upoo · · Score: 1

    With all that joy in the work place it sounds like the capitalists and libertarians have taken charge of the economy in China. If one is a slave why is suicide less than a good idea?

    1. Re:Fun Job by pyrr · · Score: 1

      Yeah, except that they haven't. Yet. It's still technically a command economy with a little pseudo-capitalism permitted to allow them to compete and take advantage of the global marketplace.

  71. Re:Profits before people by hldn · · Score: 1

    yeah well for every apple product you don't buy, i'll buy two!

    --
    http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  72. Re:Right... by proverbialcow · · Score: 1

    New FC Spokesperson: We are deeply saddened by the deaths of one of our managers and my predecessor, at the hands of our revolting employees.

    --
    The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
  73. what if.... by ushere · · Score: 1

    if you do commit suicide - you could face the death penalty?

  74. Re:All I have to say is... by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

    This is a common fallacy. It is true that prices are set to maximize revenues, regardless of production costs, but the point at which revenues are maximized is influenced by supply and demand. When prices and costs are such that there is an economic profit to be made (vs. the opportunity cost), competition increases the supply and thus drives prices downward toward the cost of production. An increase in production costs drives marginal producers out of the market, reducing supply and thus raising prices. The correlation is indirect, but quite real.

    Of course, supply and demand apply to wages as well. At the moment all indications are that there is no shortage of workers willing to accept these conditions in exchange for the current rate of pay. If you wish to better their conditions you won't do that by outlawing or otherwise penalizing the best jobs currently available in the region. You might consider driving up the demand by preferring high-value products manufactured in China; that would give the workers there a stronger bargaining position.

    --
    "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
  75. They're doing it wrong... by tnk1 · · Score: 1

    You know, this makes me wonder. I can understand you killing yourself if you have lost your job and have no prospects for the future other than grinding poverty and/or humiliation. What I don't understand is why these people kill themselves while they are still on the job.

    Work with me here. While I grant that the stress and humiliation is probably too much to bear for many people, if they couldn't hack it, wouldn't it be at least worth a try to see if you could find some way to slack off or make it more tolerable for yourself? You've got the option to end it all at any time, so why not see what you can get away with first?

    I mean, if you are already about to go kill yourself, what is the worst they can do? Fire you? Well, let them fire you and *then* go kill yourself. Just don't put the cart before the horse here.

    Don't want to work overtime? Then refuse to work it or find some way of not being there. Let them fire you if they find out. Your peers hate your guts? Well, fuck them. Let them humiliate you all they want while you catch a few rays. Or whatever rays you can get through all the smog. If it gets too bad, you are just going to jump off a building anyway. So again, fuck them.

    Getting humiliated and there's no way it will stop? Beat the snot out of the asshole and then go kill yourself. Heck, you're in China... you could kill the guy and they will execute you with a nice hanging. You won't even have to try and commit suicide.

    I'm not usually one to tell people to go postal or even to go slack off, but honestly, if these Foxconn jerks can take people from a culture that is already used to taking shit like this constantly and still manage to push them over the edge, well I think aforementioned jerks could use an attitude adjustment. And maybe, just maybe, you will actually inspire other people to go do something that will make other people's lives better in China. But that's not the point. The point is, sometimes the biggest advantage that you have is the sublime state of not giving a shit. Don't end it all before you can take advantage of it.

  76. You're using statistics wrong. by mjwx · · Score: 1

    The Wired article a published a month or two ago claims that the suicide rate at American colleges is higher than at Foxconn.

    Unless I'm missing something here.

    Yep, you're missing the fact that the people who committed suicide at the Foxconn factory were working in the same area (the Apple plant is different to the Dell plant) doing the same thing and were in the same age group. Also the time frame was much shorter then the statistics in the Wired article (less then six months vs 1 year).

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  77. Obligatory Southpark Reference... by billybob_jcv · · Score: 2

    What do the workers in the HUMANCENTiPAD factory have to sign?

  78. Your soul is ours by ivoras · · Score: 1

    Your ass is grass. We own you.

    --
    -- Sig down
  79. Re:(Foxconn != Apple) != (Apple = Good Guys) by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but Foxconn's other clients aren't as newsworthy. Logitech and Dell aren't big enough names to warrant a mention.

    How about Intel, Amazon.com, Cisco, HP, Nintendo, Nokia, Microsoft, Sony, and Samsung? All too small to mention? I agree mentioning Apple gets more eyeballs, but because of their popularity and news appeal, not just size. Not mentioning these other companies is absurdly irresponsible reporting.

    Apple does business with a company that works its slaves until they die, end of story.

    Everyone does business with companies that work people like slaves, especially in the electronics industry. Apple stands out because jobs actually tried going to all US manufacturing with his company Next and because Apple is about the only company firing suppliers for human rights violations and requiring changes to woking conditions for factories supplying Apple. Moreover, they're the only company conducting audits and openly publishing them for all to see, including what changes they require supplier to make. And there is the worst part of all this. It pays to shut up and do bad things, because being open and honest about what's happening while working to make things better for people, just gets the press to write misleading articles attributing abuses at your competitors' factories to you.

  80. Or... by rebelwarlock · · Score: 1

    ...You could stop torturing your employees. That might help curb the suicide rate. Just sayin'.

  81. This article's a joke. by Phanatic1a · · Score: 2

    Let's see what they use as examples of excessive hours and draconian rules.

    â- Excessive overtime is routine, despite a legal limit of 36 hours a month. One payslip, seen by the Observer, indicated that the worker had performed 98 hours of overtime in a month.

    98 hours of overtime. In a month. I'll grant that's a lot of overtime. If he's working a 48-hour week, call it 192 hours straight time a month, and then 98 on top of that? If he's not working weekends, yeesh, that's a month of 14.5-hour workdays. That's hard, is really is, most people won't work days like that for a sustained period of time unless they're medical residents. Even if he *is* working on weekends, which if you're working that much OT you are, then it would take working 12-hour shifts on the weekdays and then coming in for 10-hour days on the weekends. *That* I've done, and plenty of other people have too without it being "inhumane."

    And that's the article's outlier. Look at that legal limit. 36 hours a month? Jesus, the unions in this country would strike long and hard if an employer instituted a flat cap of 1.2 hours/day OT. Raise your hand if you've never worked more 36 hours a month OT. Now get off the computer and go get a job.

    â- Workers attempting to meet the huge demand for the first iPad were sometimes pressured to take only one day off in 13.

    Wow. Really? There's a rush of demand and you're so busy you have to work through the weekend? That happens so often in every business that it's a standard joke. And note even the wording: they're not required to, they're *pressured* to, and that only *sometimes*. Again, raise your hand if you've never worked two weeks off without a break.

    â- In some factories badly performing workers are required to be publicly humiliated in front of colleagues.

    Okay, this has never happened to me, it's not really a Western culture thing, outside of British public schools. American schools used to stick poor performers in the corner with a dunce cap, if Gasoline Alley and other such comics haven't lied to me, but I guess that's gone out of style.

    â- Crowded workers' dormitories can sleep up to 24 and are subject to strict rules. One worker told the NGO investigators that he was forced to sign a "confession letter" after illicitly using a hairdryer. In the letter he wrote: "It is my fault. I will never blow my hair inside my room. I have done something wrong. I will never do it again."

    Crowding? And strict rules? In China? Getthefuckouttahere.

    â- In the wake of a spate of suicides at Foxconn factories last summer, workers were asked to sign a statement promising not to kill themselves and pledging to "treasure their lives".

    Ah. The suicides. First, if Foxconn has a suicide problem, this isn't a dumb policy. The "I shalt not kill myself note" is actually a fairly standard bit of psychiatric treatment for would-be suicides, sort of like the suicide hotline phones on some bridges. Maybe it'll help, maybe it won't, but the fact that they're doing it doesn't demonstrate that they're inhumane and don't care about their workers, it demonstrates just the opposite.

    And does Foxconn have a suicide problem? I doubt it. Foxconn's huge. They've got a million workers, 17 of which killed themselves over a five-year period. So that's a rate of .34/100k/year. China's overall suicide rate it 6.6/100k/year, so employees at Foxconn are killing themselves at a rate of about 1/20th that of the general population. In *China*. They're killing themselves at a rate of about 1/30th of the US population. So maybe this policy doesn't really demonstrate concern for their workers. Maybe it's just a pointy-haired-boss response to a stupid media panic fed by a general innumeracy amongst the population, I don't know. But one thing it's not is inhumane.

    And then there's this bit:

    1. Re:This article's a joke. by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      Excessive overtime is routine, despite a legal limit of 36 hours a month. One payslip, seen by the Observer, indicated that the worker had performed 98 hours of overtime in a month. 98 hours of overtime. In a month. I'll grant that's a lot of overtime. If he's working a 48-hour week, call it 192 hours straight time a month, and then 98 on top of that?

      Anything over 40 hours a week is overtime. They found _one_ payslip with 98 hours overtime in a month. So I would assume that this was the highest, because otherwise they would have said so, and I would assume that they didn't find many that were close, because otherwise they would have said so as well. Now it is a lot of overtime, about 24 hours a week, but please note that they found this _on his payslip_. In other words, the man is actually _paid_ for 24 hours overtime each week. Unlike many software developers at game companies in the USA, who work _longer_ hours and are _not_ paid for it. If I could work 98 hours overtime for a few months _and my company paid me, like this employee was paid_, I can assure you that my wife would make me work that time :-(

      A while ago there was a report about working conditions at Foxconn was quoted as saying that "most complaints at Foxconn were related to overtime". Then the original report surfaced, and the actual fact was that "most complaints were about the fact that there wasn't always as much overtime work available as workers wanted".

  82. Apple=pseudo-social conciousness by voss · · Score: 1

    Apple users dont want to admit for the price they are paying for their products they could easily be made in the US or at least
    any asian country with decent human rights (Korea, Taiwan, Japan) or even semi-decent human rights(thailand, malaysia, indonesia) , but
    apple pockets the profits instead of paying their employees a living wage. Walmart in china treats their employees better.

  83. Re:Effectiveness pretty much assured by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

    I think you missed the stories where they killed themselves because their life was crap, and their family would be financially better off due to a nearly guaranteed lawsuit.

    Maybe not thinking in their right mind, but if that's the reason behind the suicides, this will put an end to it quickly. The family is only allowed to demand the legal minimum, which I'm sure makes this a disincentive.

    Normally I'd agree with you, but there's backstory here you failed to take into account. Maybe the stories are real, maybe not, but it's most likely the reason behind this agreement.

  84. Dilbert Alert by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    The vast majority of people who commit suicide are not thinking rationally at the time. No pledges, no clauses that say family members will only sue for the minimum monetary compensation allowable, will make a difference to someone not in their right mind.

    The forced pledge has classic PHB written all over it.

  85. What about murder? by grikdog · · Score: 1

    Going postal in an iPad sweatshop (who owns that brand, btw) is pretty much ok, though?

    --
    ``Tension, apprehension & dissension have begun!'' - Duffy Wyg&, in Alfred Bester's _The Demolished Man_
  86. Counter intuitive measures? by francoisroux · · Score: 1

    I have no feelings or respect for people who kill themselves, no matter what.I do hate employers who make people their slaves and treat them like dirt. But I mean WTF will you do if they signed the pledge and kill themselves anyway? Put them in jail to rot? LOL

  87. Weasel summary by wye43 · · Score: 2

    Summary: "staff often work six 12-hour shifts a week, 98 hours of overtime in a month"
    FTFA: "One payslip showed a worker did 98 hours of overtime in one month"

    98 hours is not the "often" case, but one extreme occurrence.

  88. Unsustainable by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    Interestingly, this seems to be an evolution of the 19th-20th C mercantilist system.

    First, the developed world exploited the undeveloped world for their raw materials, colonizing and dominating them in order to ship the raws back to the mother country. Now, it seems, that the West is more interested in exploiting the human resources (and not bothering to ship them in as a physical product, ala slavery) of these regions as cheap labor.

    Eventually it's equally unsustainable, but between now and the realization of this it will probably take an economically- and socially-wrenching on the order of the US Civil War for us to move on from our current addiction.

    --
    -Styopa
  89. Disappointed by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    I blame Apple for not doing more. You cannot control the Chinese socio-economic system through political discussions on human rights violations. Instead, you have to hit Chinese companies like Foxconn where it hurts, the wallet. Apple wants to market itself as a socially responsible company but by doing business with companies that abuse their employees, they do just the opposite. Apple has the power to deliver a strong financial blow to Foxconn should Foxconn not fall in line with expectations. However, corporate greed will enable executives at Apple to turn a blind eye to this all the while raking in money.

  90. Coming Soon: this is OUR future by tekrat · · Score: 1

    You may not believe this, but those working conditions are coming to America. It may take 20 years for it to happen, but America is failing while China is exploding. By 2018 they will surpass us as the number one superpower. Their "middle class" is already at 300 million, a number larger than the entire USA population. And it's growing quickly.

    As China's middle class grows to about 700 million, they can become a self-sustaining economy, meaning that internally, there's enough people working, and making money to buy enough stuff to keep china's economy moving regardless of exports.

    At that point, it's possible the American economy will collapse, as China doesn't need us anymore. And at that point, WE will become the cheap source of labor because America will be broke, building products for the Chinese.

    And we'll be happy to work 7-days a week for a 12-hour shift making $1 per hour, because we'll all be trying desperately to pay off our massive debt to China, which at that point, will own all the banks.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  91. Re:(Foxconn != Apple) != (Apple = Good Guys) by spun · · Score: 1

    I sort of remember, but I don't really pay attention to mods too much. And Apple fans are always whining about something, it's hard to keep track of their ire. I think authors mention Apple in stories like these just to poke the bear and get more page views.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  92. Illegal by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    I always thought it was funny that (well maybe not funny, weird might be a better word) in many places suicide is "illegal".

    I guess unless you fail, what exactly are they going to do about it?

    Its like that news story about the person that got caught in Vietnam (or was it Thailand?) trafficking cocaine, and were sentenced to death by firing squad AND fined 100,000 dollars... I don't think I'd pay the fine.

  93. Re:forced by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    That second bit (about the accommodation) was an assumption on my part as I understood it was quite common in China. Perhaps it shouldn't have been included as I didn't know that for sure.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  94. Re:Effectiveness pretty much assured by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    I think you missed the stories where they killed themselves because their life was crap, and their family would be financially better off due to a nearly guaranteed lawsuit.

    If this were true you'd expect a higher than population-average suicide rate at FoxConn, but the actual rate is lower.

    Theory does not fit the data.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  95. Signing on paper? by metamatic · · Score: 1

    How primitive. Don't they have an app for that?

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak