Domain: google.co.uk
Stories and comments across the archive that link to google.co.uk.
Comments · 2,282
-
Re:Cast iron? Not tech geek enough ;)Such a device exists, and has done for a very long time. What you need is a hay box.
Diamond plated pans seem like a terrible idea, they may have high conductivity, but it would still have to go through the metal centre and then the diamonds as well, so why bother with the diamond? unless the pan was made of solid diamond.
Secondly, heat conduction is not the key, what you need is a high heat capacity, so that your heat stays nice and constant, and doesn't fluctuate if you lift the it off the heat to stir or toss the food, which is why a huge chunk of cast iron is extremely good.
-
What bubble? This bubble
-
Re:question....
£475,000 in $. Your username is an accurate description. Fuck, I can't believe you're criticising someone else's statistics. Please accept that you are stupider than the average person (as also shown by your lack of ability to use punctuation and grammar) and decline from commenting on political matters.
-
Re:Email from Think4) What is the cost of the car and cost for the replacement battery pack? --> Not yet known for USA, in Norway 200.000 NOK 200,000 Norwegian kroner = 34,130.80 US$ (= 16,740.63 UK£)
-
Re:WhyOS/X is a great middle-ground solution for those that actually need - or think they need - proprietary software and wish to run a slick UNIX-like OS on dedicated hardware.
Increasingly however, there are those that consciously or unconsciously use free-software for most purposes, are not particularly attached to the Apple look-and-feel and don't want to pay for system upgrades. This may be aided as an OS/X user finds that many 'Linux applications' are enough for them and so realises that there's little reason to run the Apple OS itself on their (possibly aged) Apple hardware.
I've seen this happen with a couple of OS/X users (and many times with Windows users). This is widely part of the to-Linux migration strategy: porting native Linux applications to other proprietary platforms makes it easier for those people using those applications to switch.
Moreso, the blanket statement that you "can run any Linux app on OS/X" needs to be taken with a chunky grain of salt. Often getting 'Linux software' running on OS/X involves compiling, spending a lot of time in the terminal, mucking about with linkage and sorting out dependencies. On Linux this stuff is just a click away. Fink and MacPorts have a very small porportion of the software a Debian derived distribution has and probably always will. Moreso, both Fink and MacPorts are still quite plagued with dependency woes akin to those Linux users used to experience many years ago.
In short, for some there just aren't many compelling reason to switch to OS/X from Linux these days. There are however a few things about Linux that make it quite compelling for those run free-software on Mac hardware: They can
Upgrade all the software on your system at once.
Upgrade any package on the system without needing to visit websites to search for updates.
Upgrade the system without cost to enjoy the latest features and security updates
Run Linux on a wide array of computers - the OS can follow the user.
Heavily customise or simply adapt the look-and-feel to suit their tastes (they do it to their homes and our hair, why not the desktop?)
Enjoy better performance with Linux on Mac hardware (at some tasks).
Enjoy some vibrant, rapidy growing user communities (Ubuntu (for instance) has a lot of buzz and enjoys very rapid growth)
Enjoy some of the best bling on the desktop today
;-)
Contrary to bad press from the early days of this young OS called GNU/Linux, much of these things make it a really convenient and fun platform to run.. -
Re:Way to confuse NEXT with Mach and BSD
4. Apple buys OPENSTEP and uses it to produce Mac OS X
5. GNU implements the OpenStep API as GNUstepI think you have these two the wrong way around. GNUstep dates back to at least 1995, while Apple did not buy NeXT until December 1996.
-
Re:It may be fraud
Why so many countries involved in this - the address on one of their sites
http://www.medison.se/contacteng.html
is in the UK, here
http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q =DA12+5JQ
24 miles away - perhaps I'll drive past and see what is there. -
Re:duhHowever based on my 30 seconds of googling, it seems that a fair bit of the kernel is licensisde under the famous "version 2 or later, at your" [the recipient of the code] discretion"... Who wants to track down the owners of all the code in the kernel tree and check whtehtrer they mind relicensing as GPL v2 *only*? Bags not me!
Once again the FSF are ahead of the game - by asking GNU contributors to please contribute their actual copyright to the FSF. That's how come the FSF don't take legal cases where some scumbag corporate is redistributing Linux without respecting the GPL (ie., illegally): they don't own the copyright on the kernel. (Fortunately lots of the basic toolchain are FSF's so in those circumstances there's generally enough FSF code to actually stop the bastards getting away with it.)
Linus is wrong about this and the FSF is right.
-
Re:duhHowever based on my 30 seconds of googling, it seems that a fair bit of the kernel is licensisde under the famous "version 2 or later, at your" [the recipient of the code] discretion"... Who wants to track down the owners of all the code in the kernel tree and check whtehtrer they mind relicensing as GPL v2 *only*? Bags not me!
Once again the FSF are ahead of the game - by asking GNU contributors to please contribute their actual copyright to the FSF. That's how come the FSF don't take legal cases where some scumbag corporate is redistributing Linux without respecting the GPL (ie., illegally): they don't own the copyright on the kernel. (Fortunately lots of the basic toolchain are FSF's so in those circumstances there's generally enough FSF code to actually stop the bastards getting away with it.)
Linus is wrong about this and the FSF is right.
-
Re:CompetitionNight and day would only matter if gas were stored above ground. I'm pretty sure that the temperature of underground tanks won't change that rapidly.
The point about fuel being held underground is being trotted out by lots of people in this discussion, but I don't think it is safe to assume that the fuel's volume doesn't change with the weather/time of day. And I have an anecdote to counter this
;)I live in the UK, and several years ago I filled my car up only to have the fuel tank overflow later in the day because of the thermal expansion of the petrol. Early (before sunrise) on a very frosty morning I filled my car up at a BP petrol station that certainly has underground tanks (Google maps). I filled the car to the top (as I always used to do), drove the remaining few miles to work, and did my day's graft (i.e. bunking off and reading slashdot). Even though it was a winter's day, the sun had been out and when I went out to my car there was a bad smell of petrol, and it was clear that the fuel had expanded and overflowed out the filler cap!
As I said, I always used to fill my car to the very top[1], but had never before nor since had this occur, even when the car had been sitting in the summer sun all day with a full tank. I think that because I had filled my car up after a cold night and then left the car in the gutless winter sun, the temperature increase was enough to make it over flow. In the summer the car would get much hotter, and so surely an overflow would be worse? But I never had it overflow in the summer, so to me it looks like the petrol station's petrol does change temperature with the ambient temperature, and sometimes you can get more petrol than you're supposed to.
There's a few other things I'd like to mention... British filling stations often have quite a bit of metal sticking out the ground where the tanks get refilled, and this would no doubt have an effect on the fuel's temperature in the tanks. I also think that people here are assuming the tanks are buried quite deep... from the Google map I linked to above, you can see that part of the station's forecourt is concrete, the rest is tarmac. I should think that the concrete area is just large concrete slabs over the tanks, so how thick would that concrete be? 10 inches? A foot? That's not deep underground. Also, first thing in the morning the station isn't busy, so if the pumps are sitting out on a forecourt at 1 degree Celcius the pumps and pipes will be cold. Depending on the pump's design, the fuel might get a good chilling before it goes through the volume measuring guage. And I bet petrol's specific heat capacity is less than water: changing the temperature of petrol might be quite easy compared to the liquid we're all most familiar with....
/me googles... it is 4.19 kJ/kgK for water versus 2.13 kJ/kgK for petty.The way fuel prices are in the UK, I am interested in anyway to save a bit at the pump. I should think that there are some petrol stations that, for whatever reason, are susceptable to the petrol getting colder at night than their competition. Also if you filled up from a pump that is less used on the forecourt (i.e. the one furthest from the shop door), it might be colder than the other pumps -> chills your petrol, more goes in the tank.
TFA talked about Canada having temperature aware fuel guages, the USA not. I don't know what we have in the UK, but there might be some pumps around that aren't temperature aware. Food for thought...
[1] I don't fill up all the way anymore, I tend to put in 20UKP's worth when the tank gets low. That's about 200 miles worth, and by putting in the same monetary amount of petrol each time I can keep an eye on the efficency of my driving easily if I reset the trip-o-meter at the petty station. Also, why fill the car to the very top - you're only wasting fuel to carry all that fuel. I tend to only fill up all the way these days if I'm doing a long journey (and so also won't be familiar with the local filling stations).
-
Re:Great.
Why the fuck are fishermen and roads and a cruiseship dock there in the first place?
The islands have been inhabited for a long time - certainly centuries, probably thousands of years (I've not heard of any major archaeological work there, but only a thousand km off the Ecuadorean coast, the Galapogos are easily within range.) They've as much right to live in their homes as you have to live in yours, and quite possibly more right. [There has been significant immigration in the last few decades, as well as population growth within the indigenous population, which raise different issues to just bulldozing the population into the sea and letting them drown.]Here's a real easy way to save it. GO AWAY. Not just the tourists and fishermen either, everyone including the scientists. Just leave it alone.
Doesn't work - humans are destructive fuckers at the best of times, and this ain't the best of times. This particular genie is out of the bottle, and isn't going to go back into the bottle.Maybe shoot all the stray dogs first. Put a patrol boat a mile out and sink anyone that gets close to the island.
The Galapagos are an archipelago ("a group of many islands in a large body of water" - around a hundred islands in all, depending on how long a cat you want to swing. But yes, shooting all the dogs would perobably be a good idea. Please feel free to try getting elected on a "I'm going to shoot harmless ol' Rover" platform. You might add selling the children of the islanders into Moroccan paedophile brothels as a second campaign promise, which would probably improve your electoral chances and kill a second bird with the one stone. That's democracy for you - people have the right to vote for what they want, not necessarily for what you want.
Killing the rats would probably help more. But that'd be much more difficult.And don't whine about the displaced fishermen, build some fish farms. There isn't anywhere on earth with an ocean fishing industry where overfishing doesn't happen and the fishermen all wonder why there are so fewer fish. It's the clear cutting of the sea.
Fish farming is no panacea - we've been doing it for decades in the Highland sea and land lochs here. It provides some jobs (but not a large number), at non-trivial environmental cost (the pesticides used to control parasites are non-nice ; the fish shit and bypassed food screws up the local ecology); it kills not a few people (there's a lot of scuba diving to maintain the nets, plus lots of solo boat travel); and it looks like shit to the tourists. It's useful, and not the worst thing in the world to do, but it's no panacea. [I did look at the costs about setting up shellfish farming with a colleague as a part-time enterprise a good few years ago. We could probably have turned a profit, but not as good an income as we could have earned elsewhere ; we'll maybe look at the idea as retirement hobby-work. Not sufficiently worth the hassle for a main living.]
Sorry to dump on you, but the easy-sounding solutions may be appealing to rant about, but there are often very good reasons that they're not being done. -
My take on Apple's policy:
My initial reaction was that, come the European launch, if the iPhone doesn't have 3G/UMTS/HSPDA then it would be laughed out of court. However, on reflection, it sounds as if Apple's attitude is:
GPRS is good enough to check your EMAIL and gives good phone coverage. If you want a decent web-surfing experience on the train, subway or in a coffee shop, your best bet is if some bright spark has installed WiFi. So lets do a phone which makes a much better job of doing WiFi than the competition and not weigh it down and waste battery life by putting in 3G capability. We're Apple - maybe we're influential enough to put some momentum behind WiFi coverage.
(PS - am I right in thinking that EDGE/GPRS and 3G/UTMD/HSPDA are two incompatible "family trees" of protocols, and a phone that supports both needs a certain amount of duplicate "gubbins" inside?)
I have a (UK) phone that does GRPS*, UMTD & HSPDA*, bluetooth and WiFi and while 3G coverage here is ok (and HSPDA being rolled out - and very nice when you can get it) it wouldn't be much good without GRPS as a fallback. You certainly can't use the internet reliably on a train (I've tried - and did manage to send an EMAIL from a train here but it was a labour of love and certainly wasn't HSPDA!) The phone (MDA Vario II - AKA HTC TyTan) is a bit of a brick and it certainly doesn't flip seamlessly between WiFi hotspots (cough)WM5(cough).
PS - real Apple Fanbois should, of course, equip themselves with a backpack containing a laptop with a HSPDA data card and a compact WAP. Then they can whip out their iPhone and impress people anywhere with HSPDA coverage... (* OK - PCMCIA, as they say, so I'm trying out multiple permutations for the ETLAs and DETLAs here:-)
-
The security implications of this are horrific
Microsoft Corp. is giving computer users up to 500 megabytes of online storage for their documents, music, photos and video.
Basically you're putting your life on the line. Allegedly, early this June, *chan took down subeta by hacking an admin's GMail account (using social engineering to get the password). Having gained access to the 1GB+ of emails stored online at GMail, the hackers then used this information to cancel Subeta's domains, servers etc. and destroy the business. Allegedly. -
Re:What makes this really suck...
Well, let's try it:
Google Search for "ODF file". Every single link appears to be relevant.
In particular, I draw your attention to the fourth item down: ODF Converter Add-ins for Offce - a 1.6MB plugin which allows both opening and saving ODF files in Office. -
Linux not affectedThe HP link also indicates the nature of the problem, which should not be OS specific: This Intel microcode update addresses an improper Translation Lookaside Buffer (TLB) invalidation that may result in unpredictable system behavior such as system hangs or incorrect data. This recent posting to the Linux Kernel Mailing List by Andi Kleen states that Linux is not affected.
> It's been a while; is there any sign of the ucode updates being
> available, especially in light of the C2D/Q incorrect TLB invalidation
> + recent ucode to fix this?
That microcode update is not needed on any recent Linux kernel; it flushes
the TLBs in a way that is fine. -
Re:seriously
Would that be Burt Rutan, or a range of cheerful woven-palm furniture particularly popular for the modern conservatory?
And then I looked up this mistake on Google and found out just how common it is.
Oh well. Can't do anything these days without composite materials... -
Re:Or 672 blade servers and 5000 cores
HP blade servers are 6U and fit up to 16 HP ProLiant BL30 or BL35p server blades
http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/1233 0_div/12330_div.html
You can get at least dual-core dual-processor BL35p units
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=bl35p+dual-proces sor+dual-core
Not sure you can get quad-core yet, but I can't imagine that'll be long when quad-core processors are getting more commonplace.
I think you can't quite hit these numbers - you have to put some extra support hardware in each rack. But it's not far off. -
Re:Read the TODO list
-
Re:Simulated radiation trauma?
Interestingly, I read about a bunch of tiny worms on their way back from space. They've been up there long enough to produce 25 generations and scientists are going to examine their DNA to see if it's changed along the way due to aforementioned radiation.
Links at Google News.
-
Re:Adblocking? Skinning
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=safari+adblock
First hit...
-
Re:You can't
This http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?ar
n umber=179738 if you can get it (IEEE login required, Idon't have one).
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22Magnetic%20For ce%20Scanning%20Tunneling%20Microscope%20Imaging%2 0of%20Overwritten%20Data%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8 -
BBC and MSRemember when the BBC were developing their own open source video codec (Google dirac for more info)? All looked promising, the thought of being able to download BBC content to use on your OS of choice was starting to look very likely.
Then they suddenly became very friendly with Microsoft (not sure if it was connected with the change of management after Blair kicked the existing one out by saying bad things about Iraq or whether Bill came by with a sack of cash) - they developed iPlayer which was based on Windows Media Player, so now Linux and even Mac users were left out in the cold. In effect the BBC started discriminating against people unwilling or unable to pay the Microsoft Tax.
The BBC have lately promised to also make the content available on MacOS X eventually, but no dates have been fixed. In the end for it to work on the Mac they will have to offer their content either in an open DRM-free format or use Apples DRM. If they stick with the DRM route it will mean Linux and other OS users will be out of luck. FWIW (not a lot probably) here's a petition to make iPlayer cross platform (with a name like iSomething you'd expect it to work on a mac!).
-
Re:Wasn't Moore's law...I thought Moore's Law was: Everything is a government plot. No, that's Cole's Law.
-
Re:The GPL: Intellectual Theft
Nice to see a classic troll still catching the idiots.
(It is one of egg troll's many masterpieces) -
Re:The GPL: Intellectual Theft
This has been doing the rounds since long before that.
-
Re:Nah
What exactly are you going to be doing in NK?
Drilling holes in the ground, looking for oil and / or gas. Well, that's the plan anyway.
There was a page about recent (last several years) activity on this which you could reach from http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=am inex&btnG=Search&meta= , but their server seems to be down at the moment. (Sunday afternoon, UK time.) It's a long-standing project anyway - doesn't stop me from going back to East Africa, or Papua New Guinea (recent attempts for work) or Ireland (offshore which I'm floating just now), or Russia (whereI met my wife), or Iran (where our software sales team are keeping up a steady stream of sales).
But I don't think Iraq is on the agenda in the foreseeable future, though if that mad hippie Stef were to propose a month trip to his site in Mosul area, I'd have to give it serious consideration. -
Re:We had inspectors in Iraq.
You make me sick. Nuke the country? Saddam WAS NOT A RISK TO AMERICAN SECURITY HE JUST HAD LOADS OF OIL.
People like you should have your vote taken away. genocide is a minor thing to you isn't it?
http://video.google.co.uk/videosearch?num=10&so=0& q=cia+duration%3Along&start=0
http://video.google.co.uk/videosearch?num=10&so=0& q=iraq+duration%3Along&start=0
http://riverbendblog.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=chatthe planet
how about you do some research into what is actually going on in iraq and what your country has done in its 'great history of supporting freedom and democracy' -
Re:We had inspectors in Iraq.
You make me sick. Nuke the country? Saddam WAS NOT A RISK TO AMERICAN SECURITY HE JUST HAD LOADS OF OIL.
People like you should have your vote taken away. genocide is a minor thing to you isn't it?
http://video.google.co.uk/videosearch?num=10&so=0& q=cia+duration%3Along&start=0
http://video.google.co.uk/videosearch?num=10&so=0& q=iraq+duration%3Along&start=0
http://riverbendblog.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=chatthe planet
how about you do some research into what is actually going on in iraq and what your country has done in its 'great history of supporting freedom and democracy' -
Re:Awesome - any landmines?
Not just Google Earth: it's on Google Maps too.
-
Re:Not worth reading...Any yet the very first link when searching for WTC7 DAMAGE shows a clear picture of the building with a large chunk taken out of the lower section as well as first hand accounts of the damage from people who saw it first hand.
Funny that. Real funny.
Try to find that gash in a video.
And that STILL doesn't cover the fact that buildings do not collapse in their footprint on their own, nor that other buildings suffered greater damage that day without collapsing, neither in their own footprint nor otherwise. -
Re:Not worth reading...
Any yet the very first link when searching for WTC7 DAMAGE shows a clear picture of the building with a large chunk taken out of the lower section as well as first hand accounts of the damage from people who saw it first hand.
Funny that. -
Yea, Google is evil ..
"Now, if only they would filter out the sites that CAUSE the malware and spyware"
That would be the responcibility of the ISPs and the host providers.
"so many garbage/search sites come up when you search simple things like drug names and such"
Try the Product Search .. :)
Google search on viagra (the high blood pressure drug formerly knows as sildenafil citrate and remarketed as an aphrodisiac) .. 64,300,000 hits ...
was Re:Google... -
Re:It's all marketing...
Funny, my first reaction to this was "Looks like this is the new version of the 'switcheurs' troll", and I was right.
BTW, doesn't Ellen Feiss count as a "switcheur" too? -
Mail's founder admitted formula is "Daily Hate"Flamebait? Don't know if that mod was done in (misguided) good faith or not, but I certainly don't agree with the downmod either way.
To quote one article The Mail's founder, Lord Northcliffe said his winning formula was to give his readers "a daily hate" - and it does. It says a *lot* that the first thing that I thought of after reading the summary was to find out whether the story came from the Daily Mail... and that I wasn't remotely surprised when it did. The fact that the Mail's style and biases were obvious even via a secondhand interpretation of the story says a lot about it.
More here. Can't say whether they're as bad as Fox News or not, because I haven't seen a significant amount of its output (due to living in the UK). However, I personally wouldn't trust the Daily Mail as far as I could throw it.
Anyway, there is probably some truth in the story, but I expect it's been exaggerated, distorted and "enhanced" by selective reporting. For example, I remember reading a story about ecstasy in New Scientist a few years back. It was all about a study which claimed that there were serious effects of the drug on the brain. However, the story also included plausible-sounding criticism and rebuttal of the study by other equally reputable scientists.
I saw the same story in the Daily Mail later that day. It also included the details about the study and the possibly dangerous effects of the drug, and was written in a moderately "reputable" manner. However, unlike NS's report, they didn't hint that there was *any* scepticism about the findings, let alone print those views. Result was that the effect of the story was very different, more one-sided and scaremongering. Fact-by-fact, the Daily Mail story was correct, but it lied by omission.
Mind you, the Daily Mail is full of scaremongering health stories; that's a staple of the front page for them. Along with reports on how something the government has done is going to affect the value of your house, and right-wing political half-truths. -
Windows Media Censor
A simple search on the subject reveals that HBO programming and, in my case, Braveheart on AMC are among the many selections now restricted for playback or recording by Windows Media Censor Edition.
-
Actually its nearer seven dollars
I suppose it might be approaching $10 / imperial gallon, but the fuel I bought today was a little over seven dollars per US gallon.
Here's a table of UK prices.
It works out at about 10 UK pence (20c) per mile for my 1200cc car (which happily exceeds 80mph).
-
Re:What would be more practical...
I've been using computers for decades, and I haven't memorised a fraction of the keyboard shortcuts I could find useful.
For some applications you can buy a keyboard with preprinted shortcuts on keys - Final Cut, for example.
At $150 this keyboard would have been extremely competitive with such products; special keyboards can easily cost $200. However, at $1500, it's less relevant.
Michael -
Not news?
-
Re:Welcome!Are you sure? There are plenty of differences between robots and humans, but they're all made of matter and that matter's all subject to the same physical laws.
I am a zombie (or robot), and so's my wife. And so, dear reader, are you. If you're thinking "...but I don't feel like a zombie/robot, (a) how do you know what it would feel like to be a (philosophical) zombie or robot of equivalent complexity to your current state? and (b) I think you are watching the shadows on the cave wall and believing them to be alive.
-
Re:Ive got the security tool you need
A Defence against that attack vector already exists for the savvy !
-
parent is a troll
-
Re:Kind of a concern
There's a great piece of kit made by Alvarion called GSM NOW which is basically a celltower cabin on the back of a pickup with a telescopic mast.
I don't know about where you are, but in remote parts of Scotland GSM coverage is provided by transportable celltowers which have a small cabin, an extremely sturdy mast and a diesel generator to power the lot. They need to be very strong, because in parts of the north-west we have pretty windy winters. -
Re:Sorry you're mistaken
Maybe you should go and tell the members of the Scottish Nationalist Party and Plaid Cymru that one.
Again, looking at the definition of "nation" we find
A people who share common customs, origins, history, and frequently language; a nationality. A relatively large group of people organized under a single, usually independent government; a country.
So, usually an independent government, but not always. The United Kingdom is a union of small nations. Those small nations live in small countries. Which together form a larger nation and a larger country.
Personally, I prefer the "supernationality" of being British over the constituent bits, but that doesn't mean I have to deny England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland any national identity. As for the passports, it's also got European Union on them, but I wouldn't consider myself European (or do I have no choice, now that it's written on my passport?). -
Re:Somehow...
I'm afraid I can't think of Sandra Bullock the same way anymore since that song by The Beautiful South.
-
Re:Sorry you're mistaken
Depends on what definition of "country" you use. For the definition the territory occupied by a nation, then England, Scotland and Wales would qualify as separate countries.
-
Re:Yeah, that sounds about right
Unfortunately, that doesn't give me a full idea of what's going on, as if you don't know the area, you don't know what lane you have to be in at a given time.
If I'm travelling a strange route I'll usually go over the potentially tricky parts with Google Earth first. Assuming they have hi-res imagery of the area, you can get down low and easily see road markings and so forth to let you plan which lane to be in at junctions.
Mind, I got caught out when part of the route back from one place turned out to be completely different (due to a one-way system) and I ended up heading in the wrong direction on the wrong motorway
:-) -
Re:Go right ahead and blame the technology!
And she isn't even blonde! Its not exactly a sat-nav story at all, she drove up to a rail crossing and didn't know how to confront the unusual mechanism in front of her. The biggest deal is that the crossing wasn't marked on the sat-nav, and this rail crossing didn't have enough flashing lights to warn of oncoming trains (they usually do, but this one was in the middle of nowhere - google maps simply doesn't know where Ffynongain is - its actually near here
Apart from the green light thing, she didn't have enough common-sense to open both gates and drive through and then close them, but in her defence she is 20 year old, and is cute as a button - see the original BBC news story -
Re:trilogies smilogies...
You mean it will be made after all ? omg http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=%22titanic
+ too%22+%22missed+the+iceberg%22&btnG=Search&meta= -
Re:Quite Right
Unfortunately, there is another who remembers...
-
Re:Restriction on restriction
For instance, the layout of nuclear facilities, the locations and materiel of defensive bases, or the site layouts and security measures of critical but vulnerable civilian infrastructure (dams, nuclear plants, hazardous waste facilities, fuel refineries, chemical plants, etc). It used to be that taking high-resolution pictures of such installations, systematically mapping the civilian and military infrastructure, and giving them out to foreign governments was considered treason.
Fair enough point. But not particularly relevant.
A number of years ago I was flying home from work, and by coincidence my helicopter passed over a high security prison which was undergoing some building work (Peterhead prison, for what it's worth.). Everything in plain view, and if I'd wanted to snap a couple of pictures and sell them to criminals looking to bust their boss out of there, I could have. About 30 seconds later we flew over an old granite quarry near Boddam. Normal quarry, about 200ft deep into solid granite, stopped quarrying when they got to sea level and the water problems got too bad - just the sort of place you'd want to build a hardened NATO bunker into, which the rumour mill has as exactly what they were doing in there. Look down into the quarry - and all I can see is the roof of an industrial marquee covering the whole base of the quarry. All the building work going on under cover from prying eyes. Regardless of whether they're 40,000km up (geostationary), 150km up (Space Shuttle and US military spy satellites that the Shuttle launched so many of), 500m up (us in our paraffin budgie), or 5m up (Jimmy Bond about to abseil into the quarry with his camera and a white cat).
I was driving round the perimeter fence of the Spook-HQ at Cheltenham a few years earlier on the way to the pub, and I thought "what would the Spooks give to be able to put their listening centre 10 miles from the nearest public road?" I guess the answer is both "A lot" and "Not enough", because they've not done it. Then again, they simply couldn't do it without leaving the country.
I was exploring in some popular stone mines near Bath a few years later when we came to a flooded stretch of passage. Then we spotted the little red light at the far end of the straight tunnel. "Oh dear - that's the back door into the UK Government's main nuclear bunker. We must have taken the wrong turn at the 5-way junction a couple of minutes ago." Bye bye, wave at the squaddies watching the cameras.
The military have been camoflaging buildings while building them, and disguising their nature by misleading or anonymous construction patterns, since at the latest the First World War. You're lucky to be living in a country that has room to put Spook bases 50 miles from a town, or to build a nuclear processing plant without everyone in the town you build it in knowing it's ground plan in some detail. But if your military planners have gambled on that distance being enough ... well frankly they've been fools.
Of course, if you look at the satellite versions of those Google links, you'll see one of the other problems. It's not censorship (per se), it's the fog that we call "the Haar". Might be that someone has persuaded Google not to buy-in new photos of the area, but since everyone in the area knows what happens in that quarry, so what?