Slashdot Mirror

http://video.google.com.nyud.net:8090/videoplay?do cid=7521044027821122670

When calling the link directly, it tells me "Currently, the playback feature of Google Video isn't available in your country.", but the coralized link works fine :-)

KB899179 looks curiously like a shade of olive green.

Not sure if you're aware, but there was, once upon a time, a version of Photoshop for UNIX in the form of Sun Solaris. I think the last version (and maybe the only) was 3.01.

There's a PDF version of the product brochure here. (It's 1.5MB and hosted out of some university's server in Switzerland. If you're feeling kind, here's the CoralCache link of same.)

I'm curious what form it was distributed in -- I assume just binaries ... but if Adobe ever felt like bringing that one back from the dead, even if it was just recompiled as x86 binary-only, if they didn't charge an arm and a leg I think there would be a serious market for it. Even Photoshop version 3 is nothing to scoff at -- it had full CMYK, TWAIN import, and pressure-sensing tablet support, to name a few. And this was designed to run on a SparcStation 2 with 32MB of RAM; I don't care how much optimization you lose by compiling it for x86, you're not going to notice on a modern machine. And given that they had versions for Win, Mac, Solaris, and SGI, I'm betting that the codebase was pretty portable.

Ah, well. A man can dream...

http://www.oldskool.org.nyud.net:8090/pc/8088_Corr uption

Clicky

Jeez, what's wrong with using CC?
http://www.oldskool.org.nyud.net:8090/pc/8088_Corr uption

Google has plenty. Example

Coral Cache of the image

Quoth the image: Show stopper, but only observed by Intel so far. Also, any OS developer who codes like this deserves this one.

here

The original seems to be slashdotted.

Spot ON!

Now, they have fix hops, or maybe heather to make sure those survive as well.

Beer drinker.

Either way, I would hate to be a network admin for Blizzard atm.

I'd much rather be a Blizzard network admin than admins of the dead-or-dying site you linked to! At least Blizzard saw it coming! Sheesh. 07:30 CST and their server is already melting into a puddle.

Coral cache links:

http://www.karashur.net.nyud.net:8090/mmorpg/

http://www.karashur.net.nyud.net:8090/aq_wow_pics. php

Either way, I would hate to be a network admin for Blizzard atm.

I'd much rather be a Blizzard network admin than admins of the dead-or-dying site you linked to! At least Blizzard saw it coming! Sheesh. 07:30 CST and their server is already melting into a puddle.

Coral cache links:

http://www.karashur.net.nyud.net:8090/mmorpg/

http://www.karashur.net.nyud.net:8090/aq_wow_pics. php

This is old news. I reported this to Google/Gmail back in August/2005. Here is a screen capture from the forum where I posted about this issue. http://putfile.com.nyud.net:8090/pic.php?pic=1/211 5353137.jpg&s=x4 Orginal post: http://www.thecomputermechanics.com/forums/showthr ead.php?t=2334

And what you probably read was only the article was on MSNBC for the average reader. It was published in Science, so maybe you should go and read the full article before calling it pseudo-science.

Here it is. (this is the 1510, imageshack, Coralized)

http://www.exitmundi.nl.nyud.net:8090/Nemesis.htm
I actually re-read this article the other day. I had been visiting the site because of an odd 43 degree F temperature change overnight, and decided to check on that again. A temperature change of such a large amount, overnight, is not normal at all during January in NY. All the snow melted overnight.

I admit that while we are generally less sue-happy than you, we also have our fair share of idiots. After all, we have the "BILD", Europe's biggest tabloid, which has a blog (German; Coral Cache) dedicated to nothing but the horrible journalism they do (and which gets about ten reprimends per year from the German Press Counci).

Then use the Coral mirror.

Blog already slow (database connection error at first try), following mirrors had time to do their job :
MirrorDot
and nyud.net

Here it is, it works great.

No, I'm not a karma whore. I'm posting as an Anonymous Coward and won't get any karma for it. I just want people to be able to actually read the article, because it is pretty neat and I want one. Have fun!

http://www.mercurynews.com.nyud.net:8090/multimedi a/mercurynews/news/google0119.pdf

Here are some of my comments after reading it:
1) This is nothing more than a fishing expedition so that the Bush DOJ can put a spin on their flawed argument. Lets assume google complies and provides ALL searched for keywords (without IP address info) for a one month period. The DOJ argues this is to aid them in determing the effectivness of filters vs COPA. How could they possibly know whether the searches were submitted by an adult or a child? Unless they knew the actual person (not even IP address) behind the computer this data is useless.
2) It is dangerous to infer from searches any intent. Pursuit of knowledge on any topic does not mean you agree with the topic. Just a few seconds ago, the FBI (James Burrus - Deputy Asst. Director of Criminal Investigative Division) while testifying in front of the Senate said 'an internet search for pornography returned 19000000 hits'. This is the type of misleading 'facts' that will be culled from the data and abused. Do your own search for pornography and take a look at the first few urls returned.
3) I think the DOJs real purpose here is to highlight some statistics such as '80% of all searches' contains a 'dirty' keyword -- obviously filters cant work. Or "we discovered 1800 searches of 8 year old sex -- these keywords were obviously that of a pedophile'
4) From the motion other search engines other than google have already complied with the earlier subpeona.
5) Initially DOJ wanted ALL URLS in googles database. After 'lengthy negotiations' DOJ modified their request to just one-million random urls. How can the url names possibly be useful?

  Authors of software that accepts input in the form of the Portable Document Format must make reasonable efforts to ensure that the software they create respects the access permissions and permissions controls listed in Table 3.20 of this specific. These access permissions express the rights that the document's author has granted to users of the document. It is the responsibility of Portable Document Format consumer software to respect the author's intent.

Try this link instead

The page now says:

"Please Visit my site on this cached mirror... scanner photography"

Which of course takes you to a page that says:

"Please Visit my site on this cached mirror... scanner photography"

And following that link.....

The page now says:

"Please Visit my site on this cached mirror... scanner photography"

Which of course takes you to a page that says:

"Please Visit my site on this cached mirror... scanner photography"

And following that link.....

http://www.scannerphotography.com.nyud.net:8090/
With that many pictures I would have used the coral cache link in the summary.

Just in case here is a coral cache of the site: http://www.scannerphotography.com.nyud.net:8090/ I clicked on every page to load it up into the cache.

I hope this comes to market soon, because determining the crystallization conditions of a new protein, protein - protein complexes or, protein - nucleic acid complexes is the most difficult part of structure determination. However, there are many protein - protein complexes that don't form regular complexes, that is the same proteins can bind to different parts of its binding partner protein. I wonder if their new material works with such proteins. Ohh and here's the link to the full article made available by nyud.net for those who don't have PNAS subscriptions from their uni's:

Experiment and theory for heterogeneous nucleation of protein crystals in a porous medium

Yes, let's do this by numbers. One vote per company. In the blue corner we have almost two thousand companies (Coral Cache)...

By the way, the database there is quite interesting. I never bothered to find out that Kapersky Labs was a German company, for example (and that they even care about legal malware).

Condensed from here:

93 - Saint Clement I declares that the end would be coming any moment.
100 - Saint Ignatius goes on at some length about the soon to be End Times.
156 - Montanus prophesizes end times around the corner.
195 - The "Sibylline Oracles" dates imminent apocalyose at 195.
210 - A Christian seer, Judas, determined that the Book of Daniel predeicted imminent apocalypse.
365 - Saint Hilary of Poitiers prophesized the soon to be end until being taunted out of town in 366.
375 - 400 - Saint Martin of Tours carries on doomsaying as a prodigy of Saint Hilary.
500 - Around 221, Sextus Julius Africanus placed Armageddon at roughly 500 CE.
751 - Scores believe end times are near when the last Merovingian king is deposed.
Between 799 - 806 - Time of the apolcalypse according to Saint Gregory of Tours.
800 - End times according to Beatus.
848 - Thiota waltzs into Mainz in 847 to announce that the next year would be the last one.
950 - Adso of Montier, writes a letter which leads to apocalyptic panic.
968 - An eclipse causes apocalyptic panic.
Friday, March 25, 970 - Lotharingian end date.
992 - Bernard of Thuringia's predicted year of end times.
1186 - In 1179, John Of Toledo squandered his money on pamphlets predicting the end year of 1186.
1260 - Joaquim of Fiore announced with great authority that 1260 would be the End. By the time his followers realized they'd been had, he'd been dead for some 58 years.
1306 - In 1147, Gerard of Poehlde predicted this year of the apocalypse.
1310 - The end according to Fra Dolcino of Novara.
1346 - The Black Death inspires the Flagellants; predicting end times, of course.
1420 - The chosen year of the Taborites.
1420 - Martinek Hausha predicted the apocalypse somewhere between February 1st and February 14th.
Late 1400s - End times according to Arnold of Vilanova.
1490 - 1500 CE - Girolamo Savonarola's prediction of end times.

And on, and on, and on... and then comes the 20th century, filled with hundreds of purported doomsdays.

There's just no end to human stupidity, I guess.

Condensed from here:

93 - Saint Clement I declares that the end would be coming any moment.
100 - Saint Ignatius goes on at some length about the soon to be End Times.
156 - Montanus prophesizes end times around the corner.
195 - The "Sibylline Oracles" dates imminent apocalyose at 195.
210 - A Christian seer, Judas, determined that the Book of Daniel predeicted imminent apocalypse.
365 - Saint Hilary of Poitiers prophesized the soon to be end until being taunted out of town in 366.
375 - 400 - Saint Martin of Tours carries on doomsaying as a prodigy of Saint Hilary.
500 - Around 221, Sextus Julius Africanus placed Armageddon at roughly 500 CE.
751 - Scores believe end times are near when the last Merovingian king is deposed.
Between 799 - 806 - Time of the apolcalypse according to Saint Gregory of Tours.
800 - End times according to Beatus.
848 - Thiota waltzs into Mainz in 847 to announce that the next year would be the last one.
950 - Adso of Montier, writes a letter which leads to apocalyptic panic.
968 - An eclipse causes apocalyptic panic.
Friday, March 25, 970 - Lotharingian end date.
992 - Bernard of Thuringia's predicted year of end times.
1186 - In 1179, John Of Toledo squandered his money on pamphlets predicting the end year of 1186.
1260 - Joaquim of Fiore announced with great authority that 1260 would be the End. By the time his followers realized they'd been had, he'd been dead for some 58 years.
1306 - In 1147, Gerard of Poehlde predicted this year of the apocalypse.
1310 - The end according to Fra Dolcino of Novara.
1346 - The Black Death inspires the Flagellants; predicting end times, of course.
1420 - The chosen year of the Taborites.
1420 - Martinek Hausha predicted the apocalypse somewhere between February 1st and February 14th.
Late 1400s - End times according to Arnold of Vilanova.
1490 - 1500 CE - Girolamo Savonarola's prediction of end times.

And on, and on, and on... and then comes the 20th century, filled with hundreds of purported doomsdays.

There's just no end to human stupidity, I guess.

Condensed from here:

93 - Saint Clement I declares that the end would be coming any moment.
100 - Saint Ignatius goes on at some length about the soon to be End Times.
156 - Montanus prophesizes end times around the corner.
195 - The "Sibylline Oracles" dates imminent apocalyose at 195.
210 - A Christian seer, Judas, determined that the Book of Daniel predeicted imminent apocalypse.
365 - Saint Hilary of Poitiers prophesized the soon to be end until being taunted out of town in 366.
375 - 400 - Saint Martin of Tours carries on doomsaying as a prodigy of Saint Hilary.
500 - Around 221, Sextus Julius Africanus placed Armageddon at roughly 500 CE.
751 - Scores believe end times are near when the last Merovingian king is deposed.
Between 799 - 806 - Time of the apolcalypse according to Saint Gregory of Tours.
800 - End times according to Beatus.
848 - Thiota waltzs into Mainz in 847 to announce that the next year would be the last one.
950 - Adso of Montier, writes a letter which leads to apocalyptic panic.
968 - An eclipse causes apocalyptic panic.
Friday, March 25, 970 - Lotharingian end date.
992 - Bernard of Thuringia's predicted year of end times.
1186 - In 1179, John Of Toledo squandered his money on pamphlets predicting the end year of 1186.
1260 - Joaquim of Fiore announced with great authority that 1260 would be the End. By the time his followers realized they'd been had, he'd been dead for some 58 years.
1306 - In 1147, Gerard of Poehlde predicted this year of the apocalypse.
1310 - The end according to Fra Dolcino of Novara.
1346 - The Black Death inspires the Flagellants; predicting end times, of course.
1420 - The chosen year of the Taborites.
1420 - Martinek Hausha predicted the apocalypse somewhere between February 1st and February 14th.
Late 1400s - End times according to Arnold of Vilanova.
1490 - 1500 CE - Girolamo Savonarola's prediction of end times.

And on, and on, and on... and then comes the 20th century, filled with hundreds of purported doomsdays.

There's just no end to human stupidity, I guess.

Condensed from here:

93 - Saint Clement I declares that the end would be coming any moment.
100 - Saint Ignatius goes on at some length about the soon to be End Times.
156 - Montanus prophesizes end times around the corner.
195 - The "Sibylline Oracles" dates imminent apocalyose at 195.
210 - A Christian seer, Judas, determined that the Book of Daniel predeicted imminent apocalypse.
365 - Saint Hilary of Poitiers prophesized the soon to be end until being taunted out of town in 366.
375 - 400 - Saint Martin of Tours carries on doomsaying as a prodigy of Saint Hilary.
500 - Around 221, Sextus Julius Africanus placed Armageddon at roughly 500 CE.
751 - Scores believe end times are near when the last Merovingian king is deposed.
Between 799 - 806 - Time of the apolcalypse according to Saint Gregory of Tours.
800 - End times according to Beatus.
848 - Thiota waltzs into Mainz in 847 to announce that the next year would be the last one.
950 - Adso of Montier, writes a letter which leads to apocalyptic panic.
968 - An eclipse causes apocalyptic panic.
Friday, March 25, 970 - Lotharingian end date.
992 - Bernard of Thuringia's predicted year of end times.
1186 - In 1179, John Of Toledo squandered his money on pamphlets predicting the end year of 1186.
1260 - Joaquim of Fiore announced with great authority that 1260 would be the End. By the time his followers realized they'd been had, he'd been dead for some 58 years.
1306 - In 1147, Gerard of Poehlde predicted this year of the apocalypse.
1310 - The end according to Fra Dolcino of Novara.
1346 - The Black Death inspires the Flagellants; predicting end times, of course.
1420 - The chosen year of the Taborites.
1420 - Martinek Hausha predicted the apocalypse somewhere between February 1st and February 14th.
Late 1400s - End times according to Arnold of Vilanova.
1490 - 1500 CE - Girolamo Savonarola's prediction of end times.

And on, and on, and on... and then comes the 20th century, filled with hundreds of purported doomsdays.

There's just no end to human stupidity, I guess.

1. The new iMacs don't include the shell component of EFI. So no EFI shell.

2. The command-line utility, bless, has a bunch of new stuff to enable multi-OS booting. Take a look at the manpage for bless(8):

http://absent.org.nyud.net:8090/~jgw/stuff/bless8. txt

According to a little interview done by Inside Mac Games, the ATi cards use a custom firmware on the Macs. They don't just use the generic "PC" firmware.

http://www.insidemacgames.com.nyud.net:8090/news/s tory.php?ID=12680

Also, if you look around the internet you can find a system profiler dump, which does mention EFI firmware interface or something, on the ATi chipset.

http://mactree.sannet.ne.jp.nyud.net:8090/~kodawar isan/imac_intel/imac_intel01.html

Coral cache of the link. Some fucknut thought it would be a good idea to use the "Cache-Control: no-store" HTTP header, so it'll be only a short amount of time until their server blows up due to excessive MySQL queries.

Indeed.

I'd point out the clarification, but this is Slashdot, so just about everyone here should already know this.

But hey, it's popular to poke fun at Mr. Gates. I imagine that in 15 years, when Google is the new Evil Empire, everyone will misquote Larry Page as saying "There's no reason anyone would need to get the Universal Interface brain implant."

They would have had reasons for putting ".nyud.net:8090/" in the URL. Not 'target'.

http://www.patternlanguage.com.nyud.net:8090/

http://blog.siteadvisor.com.nyud.net:8090/2006/01/ the_webs_download_disasters_in.html

If it's ads that contain these annoying sounds, just block the ads. Hit them where it hurts. I recommend Proxomitron because it runs as a proxy and hence covers all all your browsers simultaneously (but you can ad rules for individual browsers with header matching).

Alternatively, if you just use Firefox, you can try the Adblock extension but, personally, Proxo is alot more powerful. If you're comfortable with regex, willing to learn a few $commands()'s, it's the way to go.

Unfortunately it's Windows only, and no longer in development (sadly the author died and never released the source), but it's still widely used and has a quite a little community about it. If you need it, I'm sure someone else can point you to a Linux solution.

Here is a taster of what Engadget can look like after a few rules in Proxo.

P.S.
On the morality of blocking ads: nobody complains when you goto fetch a drink and take a jimmy riddle during the commercial break, now do they?

Looks like the site is down, it is however there is, however, a Coral Cache copy.

http://www.xyzcomputing.com.nyud.net:8090/index.ph p?option=content&task=view&id=516

I worked on the Navlab project project at Carnegie-Mellon in the 1980s. The project built several a robotic cars, aided by vision systems and other specialized sensors, that could distinguish the road from other features, and drive. Top speed was less than 20 miles/hour in the 1980s. In the 1990s, these systems achieved speeds of 90 mph on the interstate, and only required the equivalent of a Pentium 150 in the trunk of the car (along with good sensors).

Technology from the same university has performed well in the DARPA grand challenge. http://www.grandchallenge.org/

Robots don't hog the left lane driving 50 miles per hour, talking on their cell phone. Human still need to pay attention, since there are always situations where the automated systems get into trouble.

Check out http://www.cs.cmu.edu.nyud.net:8090/afs/cs/project /alv/www/ and http://www.assistware.com.nyud.net:8090/ for details

I worked on the Navlab project project at Carnegie-Mellon in the 1980s. The project built several a robotic cars, aided by vision systems and other specialized sensors, that could distinguish the road from other features, and drive. Top speed was less than 20 miles/hour in the 1980s. In the 1990s, these systems achieved speeds of 90 mph on the interstate, and only required the equivalent of a Pentium 150 in the trunk of the car (along with good sensors).

Technology from the same university has performed well in the DARPA grand challenge. http://www.grandchallenge.org/

Robots don't hog the left lane driving 50 miles per hour, talking on their cell phone. Human still need to pay attention, since there are always situations where the automated systems get into trouble.

Check out http://www.cs.cmu.edu.nyud.net:8090/afs/cs/project /alv/www/ and http://www.assistware.com.nyud.net:8090/ for details

http://www.sdss.org.nyud.net:8090/news/releases/20 060109.virgooverdensity.html

Posting AC to avoid karma whoring.

Check out the games from THREE years ago:

http://graphics.stanford.edu.nyud.net:8090/courses /cs248-videogame-competition/cs248-02/

I'd say i'm fairly unimpressed by the lack of improvement of the games over the years. 2002 was a leap in the quality of games over previous years and the subsequent years have just been disappointing. The winner of 02, The Return of Oscuro, pushed cel-shading, polygon-level collision detection, full real-time shadowing, and a host of other techniques that few commercial games had at that time. It even had it's own muscial score custom written for it and a nice silly story line. Pretty good for about 3 weeks of work I'd say.

Original is /.ed

http://www.thetechzone.com.nyud.net:8090/?m=show&i d=479

http://thetechzone.com.nyud.net:8090/articles/e3-2 000/images/P5110008.jpg