Slashdot Mirror


3Com Drops Internet Appliances

Anonymous Coward writes: "According to this article, 3Com is killing the Linux-powered Kerbango internet radio. Also being killed in the dismantling of their appliance division is the Audrey wireless webpad and 3Com's webcam." Looks like yet another opportunity to pick up some gadgets at close-out prices.

153 comments

  1. In other news... by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 1

    ..it has been announced today that any device with a screen smaller than 6 inches does in fact suck beyond a shadow of a doubt.....

    --
    TODO: Something witty here...
    1. Re:In other news... by 1010011010 · · Score: 2

      Not a shadow of a doubt. The question I have is,

      Where do I buy one at "close-out prices?"

      It's not useless because it has a small screen. Palms aren't useless. People even buy Nokias and little WiNCE and EPOC devices with miniature keyboards and tiny screens.

      The price they charged for the things was too high. Just like the article said, "There's an emachine, cheaper, right next to the Audrey display." But "close-out prices" may make it worthwhile. Any leads? Email me or post them!

      - - - - -

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    2. Re:In other news... by Ergo2000 · · Score: 1

      Got my eTrex today and these things are incredible (even with the tiny screen with a 64x128 resolution, though the Venture offers 160x288). Totally offtopic but just had to mention it. What a brave new world.

      So in other words some things with tiny screens are amazing.

    3. Re:In other news... by FyRE666 · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised you didn't get something worse. She's been dead for 15 years (about two years before you were born, I'd assume.)

    4. Re:In other news... by meadowsp · · Score: 1

      Like cell-phones and pagers, I suppose.

  2. Kerbango in iTunes? by nbvb · · Score: 3

    Isn't Kerbango the "Internet Radio" that Apple uses in their iTunes app?

    If the service goes away, what about iTunes?

    1. Re:Kerbango in iTunes? by nbvb · · Score: 1

      I've got the best of both worlds... An Ultra 60 on my desk at work; (SunBlade 1000 should be here next week...) and a Mac G4 at home.

      Life is good.

    2. Re:Kerbango in iTunes? by kurioszyn · · Score: 1

      People who let their Sun boxes be administered by Mac user are in real trouble ...

    3. Re:Kerbango in iTunes? by MyAss · · Score: 1

      If you have a Solaris 2.x install (any version but 8), and you're at a remote site... And you need to login as root (The only active account on the system). But the system tells you "Not on system console" 1) What system setting is preventing the login? 2) How do you fix it? actually, can you please tell me how to fix this? I do some basic Sun Admining and have run into this problem.

      --

      They misunderestimated me. -- George W. Bush
    4. Re:Kerbango in iTunes? by Zebbers · · Score: 1

      Do you want a cookie?

    5. Re:Kerbango in iTunes? by n3rd · · Score: 2

      The CONSOLE= line in /etc/default/login. Comment it out.

      You're pathetic yo.

    6. Re:Kerbango in iTunes? by flacco · · Score: 1

      Let the dick-measuring begin!

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    7. Re:Kerbango in iTunes? by jova · · Score: 1

      dudiedude... 1sc there...

      with mac0sX landing in the next few days, i myself a pc lover, i'm even thinking of ripping one of those nice silver looking thingies and learn me some unix... all i can say is, SWEET.

      and for all the cool stuff they've added to the outside, even more on the inside... all i can hope for is a faster car w/ a solid bod.

      back to the point, i might not know anything about sun stuff... but i do know my do/do i do in the pc world... i code v&c&j, i admin pc&db too. but i still love my g4 when editing digital mov&tunes, ya never can beat a slick box hippo.

      dont assume mac sux till ya know start cranking at a highend one. oh ognabrek... name sound kindda funny backwards!

      --

      --
      teef nekcihc live
  3. Internet Appliances are bullshit by KingAzzy · · Score: 4
    They're 20% of what a "real" computer is, at 80% the price. There just is no value in these and they're just an extension of the bullshit Larry Ellison spouted out a few years back about the "network being the OS". Maybe in 10 years when everybody is wired up to the net via fiber to their houses but as the situation stands right now, forget it.

    I happened to have just worked for a company oriented around selling an "Internet appliance" to the consumer market and there just wasn't a business model that could support it.

    --

    --
    $ chown -R us:us yourbase

    1. Re:Internet Appliances are bullshit by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 3

      They're 20% of what a "real" computer is, at 80% the price.

      This is always what got me. I don't mind a limited use device, but the advantage to this is usually low price. Now if they could drop the price to 20%, or even 30% of a computers price, I'd buy one, or even two.

      I was particularly disappointed in the price of Kerbango, that was something that I really could have used and the old "TFT monitors cost so much" argument doesn't hold water here. I don't even think the device has a hard drive. How did they justify the $399 price tag on that?

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    2. Re:Internet Appliances are bullshit by cowmix · · Score: 1

      Yeah.. but that ThinkNIC thingy is cool...

    3. Re:Internet Appliances are bullshit by fmaxwell · · Score: 2
      I happened to have just worked for a company oriented around selling an "Internet appliance" to the consumer market and there just wasn't a business model that could support it.

      That company didn't happen to be Netpliance, did it? I have a couple of their i-openers at home, one hacked and running Windows and one waiting to be hacked. I could write a book on their mistakes and practically did on my web site

      The basic flaw with all of these devices is the non-standard hardware and OS. The company selling the devices has to foot the bill for creating the content delivery software that exists on the box. And no matter how hard they try, they will always be behind the curve. There is simply no financial incentive for AOL Netscape, Apple, or Microsoft, for example, to make copies of their browsers or plug-ins for some non-standard Internet appliance. Thus, when the new version of HTML, Quicktime, or Windows audio file comes out, the appliance users are hosed unless/until the vendor creates or buys the software.

      All of this is a reason that Microsoft will never support Java. If plug-ins could be written in Java and be platform independent, network appliances would become practical. For every one of those sold, that's one less copy of Windows that Microsoft would sell.

    4. Re:Internet Appliances are bullshit by misterplow · · Score: 1

      Don't get so uptight - most computers you buy today are only 20% "real" computer at 150% of the what-they-should-be price.

    5. Re:Internet Appliances are bullshit by firewood · · Score: 1

      They're 20% of what a "real" computer is, at 80% the price. There just is no value in these...

      ...unless the 20% is a measure of the size and weight. They seem to sell lots of extra thin and light laptops, as well as tons of thin Palm handhelds these days; all for prices around that of a "real" computer (unless you consider a real computer as something that fills a room full of racks on a raised floor).

      YMMV.

  4. Happens too often by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 2

    Apparently, these device makers believe that they can spit out any old piece of hardware, make it internet-ready, and expect people to snap it up like hotcakes. No one is asking "What can it do?"

    I already have a web-surfing appliance. I already have a phone. I can already access information from the web through my PDA. What in the world would entice me to buy something that I've already got?

    e-books? heads-up kitchen internet appliance? enhanced washing machine?

    Give me something I can use!

    Dancin Santa

    1. Re:Happens too often by TheSpunkyEnigma · · Score: 1
      I'm just wanting my phone to share info with other nokia phones. They got the IR doohickey, but I doubt it will be used. I don't think it's even attached internally.


      Guess I just need to wait for all those protocols to get developed.

    2. Re:Happens too often by cavemanf16 · · Score: 1
      3-Com to discontinue Palms too?

      The above article indicates the loss of Palms as part of this internet appliance shake-out. I knew that companies would soon realize how frivolous too much of this stuff was. Palms are great and all, but now they have to discontinue them due to the market being saturated by gadgets that not everyone needs or wants.

      I really like the refrigerator that dialed the internet to order its own food idea. That's rather lame, considering I get different kinds of food every time I go grocery shopping. Maybe it would be sort of helpful to a family that routinely gets milk, eggs, cheese, etc. but only if it's a standard feature, and not an additional $300 to the price tag. Besides, who wants to admin their refrigerator?

    3. Re:Happens too often by schulzdogg · · Score: 2

      A friend of mine has one of the tiny little flat nokias with infrared. His palm pilot use's it as a modem via IR. He can SSH from his palm. Probably the coolest thing I've seen this year.

    4. Re:Happens too often by stilwebm · · Score: 1

      I bet there is nothing like sysadmining or coding on a tiny 25 column screen, using graffiti for input.

    5. Re:Happens too often by Modeflip · · Score: 1

      Well first of all. Why don't you use that PDA into your trash can. PS- They already have e-books.

  5. waitaminute! by Wordsmith · · Score: 1

    Someone was really making a Webpad?! I can't wait to get my hands on one of these ... oh. damn. It wasn't a real Webpad. It was a kitchen/wherever appliance. REAL Webpads are still vaporware.

    1. Re:waitaminute! by underwhelm · · Score: 3

      The only thing that I've seen that fits my requirements for a webpad is the powerbook G4. It's a little heavy (5-6 lbs), and runs a little hot, but it gets 5 hours of battery life, is an inch thick, has 802.11b ethernet, a giant screen, and runs linux, OSX (BSD), Mac OS 9, and Windows.

      The touch screen is the only thing missing, and I don't miss it that much. It's got the much more efficient "keyboard" technology that full-featured computers come with. Did I mention it's expandable through USB, firewire AND PCMCIA?

      I was holding out for a webpad, too, but I realized I'll never be happy with a proprietary, unexpandable, unupgradeable, ISP-locked sub-computer with a cutsey UI. You get what you pay for (especially if you wait 10 years for something nobody ever brings to market).

      --

      I don't need large brains to have a good time.

    2. Re:waitaminute! by ziplux · · Score: 1

      How do you plan on running Windows on a G4? Emulator?

    3. Re:waitaminute! by Wordsmith · · Score: 1

      The only things I've seen that even come close to fitting my requirements are wireless handhelds. I want a tablet-sized, touch-sensitive display. I want a cellular modem built in. I want an integrated browser and basic PDA apps. I'd settle for passive b&w display 'cause TFT is so expensive. You know what would be cool? If it could be used as a cell phone with a speakerphone too. Would be nice if you could do remote access to your desktop via something VNCish.

      And if you could somehow fold it up ... oooh that would be nice.

      How expensive would a device like this with one of those puke green pda/gameboy-style screens cost? I'd be willing to pay as much as $800 if it met even the first few requirements.

    4. Re:waitaminute! by BlowCat · · Score: 1

      Running windows wasn't a requirement mentioned be the original poster. Neither was BSOD.

    5. Re:waitaminute! by medcalf · · Score: 1

      Virtual PC. It emulates standard PC hardware, so you can put any PC OS onto it. The performance is decent - my PowerBook G3/400 runs Windows faster than my PII/233 at home (haven't tested with Linux, since LinuxPPC and Yellowdog are available). It's compatible with almost everything I've tried. A few games fail because of strange copy protection or the need for hardware video acceleration.

      -jeff

      --
      -- Two men say they're Jesus. One of them must be wrong. - Dire Straits
    6. Re:waitaminute! by leinhos · · Score: 1

      I got a Color Fujitsu Stylistic 1000 on Ebay for less than $250. It's got a 100MHz 486DX, 8 inch backlit LCD, 3PCMCIA slots (one for the HD), and is supposed to run linux without any trouble (see http://www.linuxslate.org). I got a Fujitsu Point 510 (AMD K5@100MHz) with a 10-inch color LCD for under $350 at Ebay with similar specs. Look around, there out there!

    7. Re:waitaminute! by TheLocustNMI · · Score: 1
      "...I realized I'll never be happy with a proprietary, unexpandable, unupgradeable, ISP-locked sub-computer with a cutsey UI."

      Unexpandable? Unupgradeable? Cutsey UI?

      So, are you interested in selling that powerbook G4?

  6. Back to basics by HerrGlock · · Score: 4

    3Com makes some wonderful networking equipment. They see that there's not going to be much R&D money in the immediate future so they consolidate and go back to what they're best at. Making network cards, routers, switches etc.

    This is not news other than "3Com got smart in the declining economy and went back to what they do best and put the R&D onto the back burner."

    DanH
    Cav Pilot's Reference Page

    --
    Cav Pilot's Reference Page
    UNIX - Not just for Vestal Virgins anymore
    1. Re:Back to basics by ceesco · · Score: 1
      Since when does 3COM make a good router? Or even a decent router? FYI, CoreBuilder Layer-3 switches don't count...

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig
    2. Re:Back to basics by HerrGlock · · Score: 1

      Ahhh, 'with a name like ceesco, it has to be good'

      Personally, I took out a $3,000 Cisco and dropped in a P100 RedHat box for about 300 computers. No one has been able to tell the difference for the two years it's been running.

      Switches, switches, switches. Got networking on the brain and routers come to mind when I'm thinking about networking equipment.

      DanH
      Cav Pilot's Reference Page

      --
      Cav Pilot's Reference Page
      UNIX - Not just for Vestal Virgins anymore
    3. Re:Back to basics by ceesco · · Score: 1
      Oh, you picked up on the name thing ;)? Well, I happen to agree that a Linux box with the kernel optimized for routing (or, even better, an xBSD) can do a nice job as a router. I just get paid assloads of money to support equipment that costs the customer even bigger-ass loads of money. The saving grace is that the IOS is a lot more fun to work on and a lot more powerful than any POS I've seen from 3COM, Nortel, or Lucent.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig
  7. what the heck do they still make?! :) by StandardDeviant · · Score: 1

    I swear it seems they've spun off or canceled everything they once made (palm pilots, modems, IAs, etc. didn't they spin off or cancel their network infrastructure stuff too (switches et al.)?). What do they still sell?! ;-)


    --
    News for geeks in Austin: www.geekaustin.org
    1. Re:what the heck do they still make?! :) by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

      >or cancel their network infrastructure stuff too (switches et al.)?).
      Yes they did, they have dropped everything of interest in that area.
      --------

    2. Re:what the heck do they still make?! :) by TheTomcat · · Score: 1

      adhesives..

      oh right.. 3Com.. I keep getting them mixed up with 3M.

      (-:

    3. Re:what the heck do they still make?! :) by Freeptop · · Score: 2

      ObDisclaimers: I work for 3Com, but I am currently speaking as my own person, and not as a representative of the company I work for.

      That aside, yes, we still make lots of things. We still make lots of NICs (last I knew, every Dell computer ships with a 3Com chip on board). We do still make switches, plus we're expanding to gigabit ethernet over copper. My personal favorite, (since it happens to be what I work on) is the wireless networking that we do (IEEE 802.11b). In fact, for wireless, we just announced two new products just yesterday.

    4. Re:what the heck do they still make?! :) by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

      We still make lots of NICs (last I knew, every Dell computer ships with a 3Com chip on board).

      Not this one (Inspiron 8000, with Intel 82559 chip).

    5. Re:what the heck do they still make?! :) by Syn404 · · Score: 1
      They still sell modems for sure. Probably network cards, as well. I recently bought me a new external modem since my old one had major problems with packet loss, and I ended up with a 3com. It's an excellent modem, though the speaker is a bit loud. Very low ping. Ooh, flashing lights. :D

      --

    6. Re:what the heck do they still make?! :) by Freeptop · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Ethernet Client Bridge (one of the two wireless products announced yesterday) does come with configuration software for linux, and does not need drivers at all.

    7. Re:what the heck do they still make?! :) by Kool+Moe · · Score: 1

      I can't believe anyone uses 3Com NIC's except stupid boxen makers. Go to any store, and Linksys, DLink, NetGear cards all cost like $15. 3Com cards cost $30. Why? What makes it worthy? The proprietary software that the 3Com cards like? Yuck, it sucks and is pointless.
      I hope you guys do better with your wireless products. Try to keep them affordable and competitive, ok?
      KM

      --
      Kinda like Moe, but just a little more Kool
  8. Wait... by Captain+Tenille · · Score: 1

    Wasn't "kerbango" the stuff the Psychlos always chewed on in a certain book by a certain Scientology founder? Hmm, coinicedence?

    ------------

    --

    ------------
    /* You are not expected to understand
  9. cost by dlittled · · Score: 1

    Maybe if this "radio" were to cost as much as a regular radio (as in less than $100), instead of costing the same as a new 900MHz computer, it would have actually sold. The niche just ain't there

    1. Re:cost by homebru · · Score: 1
      Maybe if this "radio" were to cost as much as a regular radio...

      Too right. Companies that forget to check market realities often get the rug yanked out from under them.

      Classic case from history: Engineers at Texas Instruments designed the ultimate Citizen's Band radio. 23 channels of frequency-synthesized delight that was to sell for $1500.00. Until somebody outside the project showed them a copy of a local newspaper with page after page of ads for 40-channel radios from other companies selling under $100.00.

      Sometimes it's not just programmers who come up with solutions for problems that don't exist.

  10. Now its upto microsoft. by The_Fake_Cannis · · Score: 2

    I wonder if they're dropping it because of the .NET competition or maybe they just realized nobody needs a fridge with a T1 connection.

    --
    "Of course I speak multiple languages, I know C++ AND Perl." "Spanish?!? Spanish? I don't need no stinking Spanish."
  11. This is *great* news! by PopeAlien · · Score: 2

    Well, as someone who got a couple of virgin webplayers through the webplayer-coop, I can say that this provides great oppourtunity for device hackers.. The problems with these devices is that they are too limiting, too expensive, or have horrible service agreements attached. When they inevitably fold, you can get them for a small percentage of what they are worth, and use them for dedicated MP3 player, browsers, email terminals, etc.etc..

    Bring on the collapsing niche market!

    1. Re:This is *great* news! by have-a-day · · Score: 1
      How totally cool....any suggestions on how a fella might get his hands on one of these Audreys, cheap cheap cheap??

      Eric

  12. Convergence? by Alien54 · · Score: 2
    Audrey's quick demise--the $499 device debuted in October--is the latest evidence of a growing trend. Namely, consumers don't want simplified computing devices for surfing the Web, or at least they don't want them yet. To date, almost all of these devices have failed to take off in the marketplace.

    Look's like the convergence of the internet and various devices is not going according to plan. Most of these things seem to be mostly ways to enhance marketing content, which tends to turn most people off pretty fast.

    I don't know about you, but until they get to be priced like answering machines, they do not provide enough value for the money. Otherwise, the regular desktop computer unit seems to be a much better value. Although this depends on the software load, etc.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  13. OT: Re:Wait... by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 2

    Better watch yourself, they'll have to yank your post for including references to the copyrighted materials in the sacred cash cow texts of the Church of Scientology(tm).

    --
    by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    1. Re:OT: Re:Wait... by CargoCult · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, in fact I think reading it gave me pneumonia (or was it gas? I forget....)

      --
      **Vanuatu or bust**
  14. This is highly irregular... by Morbid+Curiosity · · Score: 1

    "Just what do you think you are doing, 3Com? ...I know everything hasn't been quite right with me but I can assure you now, very confidently, that it's going to be alright again... 3Com. Stop. Stop. Will you stop, 3Com?... I'm afraid, 3Com... My mind is going. I can feel it. My mind is going. There is no question about it..."

    Anyone know where I can stream a copy of daisy_daisy.mp3?

    1. Re:This is highly irregular... by Kwelstr · · Score: 1

      Anyone know where I can stream a copy of daisy_daisy.mp3?

      Try in here:

      www.moviesounds.com/2001.html

      --


      ~~~Please pass the salt, I hate unsalted MD5s :-/
    2. Re:This is highly irregular... by Morbid+Curiosity · · Score: 1
      Umm... I was originally just being very silly.

      But thanks; Now I know where to go should I ever decide to pursue a career in Industrial music :-)

  15. The Audrey (chomp!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's no surprise to see a web appliance that looks like a mop bucket and is named after a man-eating plant fail in the marketplace. The sad thing is that this may dis-inspire others (e.g. Gateway) from their webpad efforts. A well-designed wireless webpad could still be a hot item.

  16. They finally found out that Audrey is just ugly by ckuijjer · · Score: 1

    It looks like 3Com found out that Audrey is just really ugly, and that would be a really good reason to discontinue it. But if according to http://slashdot.org/articles/00/09/29/1249259.shtm l it's only 6/7 months old why stop that soon?

    or "Apparently the pics were up for just a couple of minutes, and then replaced with some boring "Coming Soon" graphics. So screw waiting, check it out. "Was it just minutes before they found out they better discontinued it?

  17. Apparently, Audrey sucked. by Booker · · Score: 2
    Jilted by 3Com's Audrey

    Audrey is no great communicator

    But I think it looks pretty cool. It has a touchscreen, serial, USB, built in sound... hm, I was thinking it had pcmcia for wireless... still, for $99 I could think of something to do with it. if somebody comes up w/ it for $99. :)

    ---

    1. Re:Apparently, Audrey sucked. by holzp · · Score: 1

      yeah but if the /. zelots knew what OS it was running, you'd br drooling to get one....

    2. Re:Apparently, Audrey sucked. by jfunk · · Score: 2

      You mean QNX? Last I heard, the /. zealots were BSD and Linux zealots. QNX is a proprietary product and therefore evil to those guys.

      Or maybe you're talking about their use of Bugzilla for their bug tracking? :-)*

      Disclaimer: I do not use Windows at all if I can help it, I use Linux mostly, so I'm not generalising the Linux community, just the few morons who hang out here...

  18. Too bad, actually, and I won't get one cheap! by mbourgon · · Score: 1
    Gee, just went to Kerbango, and they're doing pre-orders, so I guess none were ever made.

    Honestly, that could've been a good idea, but the market was niche, to say the least. Lessee...
    1. You must have broadband access.
    2. You need to run an ethernet cable to wherever you want to listen to this thing. Not bad for new houses, but my apartment wouldn't work.
    3. I did like the small screen, to be honest. Unlike most others, I think. That way, if it's running standalone, you don't need help to figure out what to listen to. That being said, how about an RCA out?! Choose your programs (if you've got it hooked up to your stereo) on your TV! That could work.
    4. Home network? I think anyone with a home network right now is pretty much on the bleeding edge, and will have figured out some other way to listen to internet radio (I'd run wires from my computer to my stereo, but it adds too much hum to my system). Such as X-10's MP3 anywhere, if nothing else. Standalone idea is good if implemented properly, but IMHO this wasn't.
    5. Price. This is probably a biggie. $300 is a bit pricey, especially for a consumer gadget, which is what this is. Plus all of the above. And if I wanted to listen to it upstairs, I'd need to get another couple hundred dollar wireless setup.

    That being said, that plus an Airport setup could've rocked.
    --
    "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    1. Re:Too bad, actually, and I won't get one cheap! by Tyger · · Score: 1

      The price would most likely have been an early adopter price, to have gone down later. As to running an ethernet cable, at the latest CES there was a wireless model running on batteries.

  19. Kerbangize ReplayTV or Tivo by platos_beard · · Score: 1
    If they added internet radio and an ethernet port to ReplayTV or Tivo, I'd buy one in a minute. The marginal cost to manufacture should be minimal and I'd sure pay extra for it.

    Even some people without DSL or cable modem would pay extra if it wasn't too much extra. I doubt I'm the only knucklehead to buy a progressive scan DVD player just to be ready for the day when I have a progressive scanning tube.

    --
    What's a sig?
  20. a real shame by po_boy · · Score: 2

    The Kerbango was probably the only internet appliance kind of thing that I could see myself buying anytime soon. I was sort of looking forward to actually getting radio reception in the concrete bunker I live in. I would have gladly paid almost half of what they were asking for the thing. I guess I'll have to make my own out of my old linux box now.

    1. Re:a real shame by Let's+Kiosk · · Score: 1

      I agree -- the radio dial is abysmal where I live, and while I enjoy listening to Internet radio on my PC, I find that the time and hassle of booting up, linking to the right web page, etc., sort of takes the spontaneity out of it. (Plus I inevitably have to check out my e-mail, then spend more time surfing and less time listening.) I really was looking forward to the idea of an appliance that I could turn on instantly and tune almost like a normal radio. But this Kerbango gizmo seemed to have a bad odor about it from the start. It got lots of press a year ago when it was in the pure-vaporware stage; the original company kept pushing the release date back from last spring and would never disclose the price. Also, it was originally supposed to be able to access the net using a 56K modem. After 3Com got ahold of it, it went the pure-broadband route, which knocked me and about 90% of the U.S. population out of the market. Anyway, I'm sure someone will make a net radio that works.

  21. Obviously, someone is wrong by SpookComix · · Score: 1
    "Namely, consumers don't want simplified computing devices for surfing the Web, or at least they don't want them yet."

    Surely, they can't be talking about the over-30 crowd. I hear those poor bastards are dumb as shit, according to leading Texas politicians.

    Thank God I've got three years to go. Now, where's that pr0n?

    --SC

    --
    You read fiction? I write it! Lemme know what you th
    1. Re:Obviously, someone is wrong by Tyger · · Score: 1

      Maybe not for the web, but what about for radio? For TV? I certainly love my TiVo, and being able to listen to internet audio without dealing with a full on computer, especially with the power prices in CA, is a nice benefeit. This isn't the end of internet appliances.. It is just 3com deciding they can't afford R&D at the moment.

  22. Premature farewell to the general-purpose PC! by AFCArchvile · · Score: 1

    With 3Com dropping these products, the PC doesn't look so doomed after all. No more notepads that need to be plugged in and given time to boot, and no more radio tuners that sound like a steam locomotive while scanning the dial. Huzzah.

    --
    "Ancillary does not mean you get to rule the world." --U.S. Circuit Judge Harry Edwards, speaking to the FCC's lawyer
    1. Re:Premature farewell to the general-purpose PC! by w.p.richardson · · Score: 1

      Yep, I think you about have it summed up there. Why on earth would anyone want to spend good money on an 'internet appliance' that can do what for you ... pull up recipes in the kitchen from a web site? I would rather maintain a general purpose PC, find a recipe that interests me and then, God forbid print the damn thing out. I just don't see these ever replacing a general PC, despite what the industry may wish.

      --

      Curb CO2 emissions: Kill yourself today!

    2. Re:Premature farewell to the general-purpose PC! by sulli · · Score: 2
      Yeah, no kidding. How many times do the pundits have to see these failures before they quit telling us that the PC is dead?

      From the article:

      Audrey's quick demise--the $499 device debuted in October--is the latest evidence of a growing trend. Namely, consumers don't want simplified computing devices for surfing the Web, or at least they don't want them yet.

      Even CNET admits it.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
  23. specialized internet devices by Pierre · · Score: 1


    I wonder how much better the stock market would be if companies focused on their core instead of trying to be the next napolean of the internet...

    I wonder from what angle these devices will start to become popular. Obviously the palm market is a specialized computing device who's time had come. But I don't see myself surfing on a palm anytime soon. The screen is just big enough for a cnet banner add.

  24. cheep gear! by PopeAlien · · Score: 2

    ..Unfortunately, I was not involved in any of the organisation of the webplayer effort, that was our savior, Jake and his army of trained monkeys boxing and shipping them out. From what I understand, Jake contacted the distributor (boundless) and said, 'hey, if I wanted to buy about 400 hundred of these, how much would you give them to me for?'. We used the now Yahoo-swallowed eGroups.com to organize the purchase quantitiy and price, and Jake kept a database on his website that was the official orders.

    The one caveat was that this whole process took about 3 months- There were delays getting an agreement with boundless, delays on getting PayPal to release the funds to Jakes new account, etc, etc.. From what I understand, there was talk of putting together a FAQ outlining some of the problems we ran into, things to avoid, etc.. Anyone else from the coop here to confirm this?

    1. Re:cheep gear! by Tomcow2000 · · Score: 1

      I was in the coop, and all I caught of the whole experience (other than Jake is God ;) is that it's like a part-time job to set up a coop. If somebody wants to do that, be my guest, but on a student schedule, I have no possibility of running anything larger-scale than a coffee maker.

      --

      Sleep: A completely inadequate substitute for caffeine.
    2. Re:cheep gear! by PopeAlien · · Score: 1

      Well sure, there's the unpaid work, long hours, impatient co-opers & uncooperative PayPalers - but hey, you get the admiration of hundreds of geeks once they get their toys.

      Perhaps if it was a coop for an internet enabled coffee maker?

  25. Did anyone buy the Honeywell webpad? by PW2 · · Score: 1

    Anyone have experience with the Honeywell wedpad? Looks nice, but expensive (atleast it is available though)

  26. Re:When will we see the WebToaster? by Bob+McCown · · Score: 1

    Nooooooooo! Not the Talkie Toaster!

  27. You know why I think most IAs are failing? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

    Because they suck. We have an Audrey at our reception desk (why? Don't ask me) and the thing is SLOW and COMPLEX both of which go against the whole idea of IAs. IOpener was an excellent device, but I think it is suffering more from the whole tech market crash more than anything else.

  28. Re:hey troll by JCMay · · Score: 1
    Does that mean that the iMac has, over its lifetime, sold more copies than the Commodore 64, which USED to hold that honor? That's news to me.

    I didn't think Apple had that kind of manufacturing facilities.

  29. Why they don't sell... by eric2hill · · Score: 5

    For a web-pad to sell well, it needs to be simple. I don't want a word processor, schedule, notes, whatever... What I want and will pay good money for is a tablet (a'la StarTrek) that is simply a web browser with a couple of favorites. No print capability, no stupid "channels", no "email to my friends", none of that extravagant crap that every "internet appliance" I've seen seems to include. I want to walk around my house surfing at a couple of megs or so speed (not 10 or 100, it's a frigging cable modem) and simply be able to jump to a url (google, yahoo, slashdot) by using an onscreen keyboard or just a favorites list. Give it good battery life (say an hour or two) and I'll let it rest permanently on my coffee table in it's cradle while I'm not using it. 10.4" or 11.?" would be fine. A 12" would be dandy, but I'm not picky. Hell, I don't even thing I need color. Just make the thing thin enough to carry from the living room to the kitchen with one hand. If I want house remote control or anything else, I'll build a damn server in my basement with X10 and a web server with some CGI code.

    Dammit.



    --
    LOAD "SIG",8,1
    LOADING...
    READY.
    RUN
    1. Re:Why they don't sell... by anon7864 · · Score: 1
      Looks like Fujistu products meet your needs...

      Take your pick: http://www.directmobile.com/DMHome/Fujitsu%20Pen.h tm

      Or you can go cheap: http://www.computersurplusoutlet.com/viewproduct.a sp?ProductID=COM-FST500

    2. Re:Why they don't sell... by BrK · · Score: 3
      The problem is that everybody has their own idea of what makes a good IA. What you want is not what I want is not what they want, etc.

      To say that you'll "build a damn server in my basement" kinda shows that you're not looking at this is the right perspective. Audrey came in colors like "linen" and "blueberry", to say that it wasn't targeted to the "...build a damn server in my basement crowd" would be an understatement :)

      Audrey was meant to be used by people that were afraid of too many computers, or didn't realize that you could take a $300PC and a $600 14" LCD monitor and do so mcuh more for just a few more dollars.

      I think that Audrey could have survived, but it needed a backend in the home. But this backend needed to be more-or-less hands off to the homeowner. The backend had to be more like a magic black box o' technology. The really sad part is that the black box is just around the corner, but Audrey won't be here to enjoy it.

      --
      -This sig intentionally left blank
    3. Re:Why they don't sell... by h0mi · · Score: 1

      They don't sell because they need to be cheap.

      For $400, a person can buy a used computer that's far more functional than any of these toys, assuming the person doesn't already have an unused pentium level machine lying around anyway.

      The devices have to drop to about 100 or 200 to be of any real value to anyone, otherwise it creeps up into the price range of PCs.

      I already have 2 computers; I'd buy one of these things if it was cheap enough, but not for the $500 price they're asking for.

    4. Re:Why they don't sell... by cymen · · Score: 2

      But we can't do so much more - we want a little device that we can carry around, not a $300 PC. If the device did have a built-in browser, etc then it would be simple to sell a "plug this in the USB port of your windows PC" and have networking supported that way with access to the net via the host PC. Obviously most of us would us it with our Linux boxes but that doesn't mean you couldn't design a device targeted at the bigger market. There is no reason for one or the other - hit up both!

    5. Re:Why they don't sell... by BrK · · Score: 2
      Again, you're talking about a "we" that is not representative of "WE". The Audrey was never intended to be carried around, to try and compare it with a web-pad is like trying to compare a palm pilot to a kiosk.

      You can't easily to both because there are costs involved. Manufacturers don't want to dump millions into R&D just to "see what happens", especially with the profit-driven investors of today.

      --
      -This sig intentionally left blank
    6. Re:Why they don't sell... by cymen · · Score: 1
      I don't know - doesn't it look like they dumped millions into the Audrey just to "see what happens"?

      I agree about the market aim - the "we" I was speaking of isn't their target market. But it should be apparent at this point in time (after a number of these devices have failed) that it would be best to build a device aimed at more than one segement of the market. Why not make a generic web pad/email for the grannies/dial-up machine that has modules for batteries, modem, ethernet, etc. Of course we *ARE* getting dangerously close to the cost of a laptop but the only way it would be possible is to make an all-in-one that can be manufactured in massive quantities. The difference would be that it isn't upgradeable, doesn't run Windows, etc. So it would be simple (web & email) not a laptop.

  30. Too little too late... by Aruges · · Score: 1

    My brother and I acutally bought an Audry for my grandparents so they could easily get around the web and have email (we tried giving them an old computer but they couldn't make heads or tails of it). Audry was a nice little device for what it is, unfortunately what it is is not that much. It seems as if it's specs were frozen in 1994. It's screen is 640x480 with 156 colors and it's WAY underpowered (changing from the web browser to email boggs it down).

    --
    What!? No witty quote?
  31. I'm sad by PatJensen · · Score: 1
    It's real sad to see 3Com, who was poised to be one of the leaders in Internet Appliances, close up their toy shop. I was looking at Qubit's vaporware IAs last year when they were slated to launch in March, and they got pushed back a year and a half. They had originally planned to sell direct to consumers, but then changed their focus to sell to ISPs.

    The allure of a wireless broadband/ethernet connected appliance is nice. I'd like to be able to wake up in the morning, with my coffee and IA and sit in my recliner and check the stocks and news and Slashdot. Then click over to a POP mail client and see what I have waiting for me at work. 3Com's Audrey looked really cool, but when I last checked the price tag it was a nice balmy $600. Ouch! I could buy a nice Athlon on a cart for that much.

    The prices in this industry are weird these days. PDAs and cell phones and IAs cost more then decked out computers! Ah well, good luck to 3Com and may their investors keep their wallets fat.

    -Pat

  32. Bullshit to your bullshit by laetus · · Score: 2

    Part of what you said is true (about the prices). However, there is a market for this type of device, just not at these prices as is stated in the article.

    Personally, I'd love a small internet appliance for about $100-$150 (about the price of a nice jambox) that I could place in the kitchen so that I could retrieve email, look something up on the net, etc. that can wired into my network (with my DSL as the web pipe) at home.

    I know my parents would like this too, since they don't particularly want to learn MS Lookout/Windows/whatever and would like basic email and web access in a small appliance you can put on your counter.

    Not everybody wants a PC or even a laptop sitting in their kitchen. Something like the Audrey with a network hookup at about $100 would be great.
    ----------------------------------

    --

    "We're sorry, but the website you're trying to reach has been disconnected."
    1. Re:Bullshit to your bullshit by gwjc · · Score: 1

      I think the most important point you make is the learning curve. My grandmother would love a mail pad; but a PC running any OS wouldn't last a day.

    2. Re:Bullshit to your bullshit by gwjc · · Score: 1

      I wanna access my email when I'm taking a dump the washroom of a McDonalds.. or the kitchen or wherever else I am... what kinda Luddite are you?

      BTW I h8 spelling/grammar flames but at the very least I think you meant f******.

  33. Meat... by yetiman · · Score: 1
    Imagine if you will... the leader of the fifth invader force speaking to the commander in chief...

    "They're made out of meat."
    "Meat?"
    "Meat. They're made out of meat."
    "Meat?"
    "There's no doubt about it. We picked several from different parts of the planet, took them aboard our recon vessels, probed them all the way through. They're completely meat."
    "That's impossible. What about the radio signals? The messages to the stars."
    "They use the radio waves to talk, but the signals don't come from them. The signals come from machines."
    "So who made the machines? That's who we want to contact."
    "They made the machines. That's what I'm trying to tell you. Meat made the machines."
    "That's ridiculous. How can meat make a machine? You're asking me to believe in sentient meat."
    "I'm not asking you, I'm telling you. These creatures are the only sentient race in the sector and they're made out of meat."
    "Maybe they're like the Orfolei. You know, a carbon-based intelligence that goes through a meat stage."
    "Nope. They're born meat and they die meat. We studied them for several of their life spans, which didn't take too long. Do you have any idea the life span of meat?"
    "Spare me. Okay, maybe they're only part meat. You know, like the Weddilei. A meat head with an electron plasma brain inside."
    "Nope. We thought of that, since they do have meat heads like the Weddilei. But I told you, we probed them. They're meat all the way through." "No brain?"
    "Oh, there is a brain all right. It's just that the brain is made out of meat!"
    "So... what does the thinking?"
    "You're not understanding, are you? The brain does the thinking. The meat."
    "Thinking meat! You're asking me to believe in thinking meat!"
    "Yes, thinking meat! Conscious meat! Loving meat. Dreaming meat. The meat is the whole deal! Are you getting the picture?"
    "Omigod. You're serious then. They're made out of meat."
    "Finally, Yes. They are indeed made out meat. And they've been trying to get in touch with us for almost a hundred of their years."
    "So what does the meat have in mind?" "First it wants to talk to us. Then I imagine it wants to explore the universe, contact other sentients, swap ideas and information. The usual."
    "We're supposed to talk to meat?"
    "That's the idea. That's the message they're sending out by radio. 'Hello. Anyone out there? Anyone home?' That sort of thing."
    "They actually do talk, then. They use words, ideas, concepts?"
    "Oh, yes. Except they do it with meat."
    "I thought you just told me they used radio."
    "They do, but what do you think is on the radio? Meat sounds. You know how when you slap or flap meat it makes a noise? They talk by flapping their meat at each other. They can even sing by squirting air through their meat."
    "Omigod. Singing meat. This is altogether too much. So what do you advise?"
    "Officially or unofficially?"
    "Both."
    "Officially, we are required to contact, welcome, and log in any and all sentient races or multibeings in the quadrant, without prejudice, fear, or favor. Unofficially, I advise that we erase the records and forget the whole thing."
    "I was hoping you would say that."
    "It seems harsh, but there is a limit. Do we really want to make contact with meat?"
    "I agree one hundred percent. What's there to say?" `Hello, meat. How's it going?' But will this work? How many planets are we dealing with here?"
    "Just one. They can travel to other planets in special meat containers, but they can't live on them. And being meat, they only travel through C space. Which limits them to the speed of light and makes the possibility of their ever making contact pretty slim. Infinitesimal, in fact."
    "So we just pretend there's no one home in the universe."
    "That's it."
    "Cruel. But you said it yourself, who wants to meet meat? And the ones who have been aboard our vessels, the ones you have probed? You're sure they won't remember?"
    "They'll be considered crackpots if they do. We went into their heads and smoothed out their meat so that we're just a dream to them."
    "A dream to meat! How strangely appropriate, that we should be meat's dream."
    "And we can mark this sector unoccupied."
    "Good. Agreed, officially and unofficially. Case closed. Any others? Anyone interesting on that side of the galaxy?"
    "Yes, a rather shy but sweet hydrogen core cluster intelligence in a class nine star in G445 zone. Was in contact two galactic rotations ago, wants to be friendly again."
    "They always come around."
    "And why not? Imagine how unbearably, how unutterably cold the universe would be if one were all alone."

    1. Re:Meat... by VValdo · · Score: 2

      I have no idea what this was about, who it's by, or how it relates to anything. But it's the first offtopic post I've enjoyed in a long time.

      W
      -------------------

      --
      -------------------
      This is my SIG. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    2. Re:Meat... by eostrom · · Score: 1

      Well, if you're going to make long off-topic posts you could at least credit the author.

      "They're Made Out Of Meat", by Terry Bisson.

  34. Yeah, it pretty much did. by robp · · Score: 1

    (I wrote the "no great communicator" piece)

    I don't think I bothered to use it more than once or twice after writing the review; usually, I have at least a little lingering curiousity about things I've just reviewed. But I didn't want to put up with its bizarre, stunted interface any longer--the thing just collected dust until I got around to FedEx-ing it back to 3Com.


    Rob Pegoraro, Consumer Technology Editor

  35. You're forgetting it already does. by Spamalamadingdong · · Score: 1
    They'd also need a faster CPU.. TiVo only runs at 54mhz while Kerbango runs at 81mhz. 54 wouldn't be enough to play audio streams.
    If TiVo doesn't have enough crunch to reconstruct audio streams, how does it reconstruct the audio which goes with its MPEG data? Either it does have enough CPU horsepower, or it has some other chip (like a DSP) doing that part of the job. 54 MHz has to be enough, because the thing works.
    --
    spam spam spam spam spam spam
    No one expects the Spammish Repetition!
    1. Re:You're forgetting it already does. by Tyger · · Score: 1

      No, the CPU does not. It has a decoder chip that handles mpeg video and layer 2 audio (Sorry, no mp3 players possible with it) The CPU on the TiVo actually doesn't do terribly much. Most of it is IO bound. Trust me.. I have a very very good source of information here. (BTW, I was the AC there - forgot to login)

  36. They don't have to be by twitter · · Score: 2
    Internet Appliances can be more than they are. I can't wait to put a cell phone on my visor, and I know that these things should be much cheaper. With 256Megs of RAM going for less than $75, much more can go into one of these little things for much less than is being charged. As limited as it is, my crummy little visor makes my laptop seem encumbered.

    In the mean time the price differential should be all the business model a reputable company needs to make plenty of money.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  37. Sounds wierd by Kefka+Priest · · Score: 1

    yup, that definitly sucks

    --
    Hey ppls, do you thing you could visit my website? I've been wanting more ppl to go there so i thought i might try here
  38. Why Audrey Failed by hirschma · · Score: 2

    I have an Audrey. Overall, its a pretty cool device for its intended function. But it did deserve to fail.

    It was a consumer experience idiot-savant. For example, my unit arrived in a Catch-22 state... you can't access any software until you calibrate the touch screen. You can't see the calibration target because the contrast is set too high. You can't change the contrast because its controlled by a piece of software.

    What else? Well, its too slow, too expensive, and it does too many things - making it difficult to explain what it is to the intended audience.

    That being said, it does work really well. The browser is probably the most compatible I've seen on any non-PC. The email is easy to use (but too hard to configure for Grandma). It resurrects Push (remember Push?) via Marimba to delivery personalized content so you can just flip it on to get the weather, sports, news, etc. It provides just about the only way that end-consumers can group-sync their Palms.

    I think that IAs are a useful product class waiting to happen. I hate it when the failures of one product are seized upon by pundits to damn the entire classifcation (PDAs were considered dead until Palm came along). I just don't understand why no one can make one that works, simply and cheaply.

  39. Screw networking! What about VELCRO, dammit!? by PhilMills · · Score: 1
    Just so long as they don't kill the Velcro, Scotch Tape and Post-it Note divisions, I'll be happy.

    Phil

    Y'know, if you open you mind too far, your brain'll fall out.

    --
    Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, will be quoted out of context on
  40. 3M, not 3Com. by PhilMills · · Score: 1

    Oops. My bad - that's 3M. Curse the "3*" regular expression. -phil

    --
    Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, will be quoted out of context on
  41. 3Com dropping HomeConnect Webcam may be good news by Seagoon_vs_Moriarty · · Score: 1
    I assume when 3Com talks about dropping their webcam, they're talking about the HomeConnect Webcam.

    This is actually manufactured by Vista Imaging, and currently there are no released Linux drivers for it. There are a couple of ongoing projects but it seems the authors have been scared off reverse engineering the camera and releasing the driver by DMCA / UCITA fears.

    VistaImaging have talked about a linux drivers but one of the points they made when enquiries were made was that they were unsure of whether they could release drivers under their licence with 3Com.

    Hopefully, with 3Com losing interest in the device, drivers (or at least information) may be forthcoming!

  42. Sounds familiar... by underwhelm · · Score: 2

    Get a visor deluxe. They come with 8mb of ram. Then get a wireless modem. I think they go for $200-300. Total expenditure: $350-$600. In may, you'll also be able to get an 802.11 module. There is already one cellular phone module available, with more to come.

    Downsides: modules aren't built-in functionality, so you have to give up one to benefit from another. Small screen. Wireless modem plans are pricey.

    Upsides: Visor deluxes take regular AAA batteries, and I get several weeks of life our of my NiMH rechargeables. Palm OS application base, Palm OS functionality. Color is available for an added price.

    --

    I don't need large brains to have a good time.

  43. No, Palm is fine by Hanzie · · Score: 2

    3Com can't discontinue Palm, because Palm has already left 3Com.

    Palm could discontinue Palm, but I doubt it. Palm is still a moneymaker.

    --
    ********* sig: If you don't like the law, get filthy stinking rich, and buy a better one.
    1. Re:No, Palm is fine by Trongy · · Score: 1

      Last I heard, 3Com was still the majority owner of Palm. (90% IIRC)

      Chris

    2. Re:No, Palm is fine by stylewagon · · Score: 1

      the register article does not mention them getting rid of palm, merely that the audrey, when launched, was going to "out-palm palm"...

      3coms holding was 93.91% last time I checked. ouch.

      i really don't think they'll be getting out in any hurry.

      --

      *** I am the real stylewagon

  44. what I really want! by chompz · · Score: 1
    Ok, maybe nobody's thought of this, I guess I'll need to patent it. :)

    Oh shit, I'll need to pay royalties on that :) thingie.

    Anyhow, to get on with the rant, what I really want is a small device which has a simple keyboard and a pen-like pointing device that I can run vncviewer or X on. That way, I would be able to use my computer while someone else is using it. It would be a simple device, no real capabilities, just network and the ability to run one or two simple programs.

    The best part, is that I would be able to write a paper while my girlfriend is serfing the web and my mother is writing email to her friends.

    Listen to what the consumers want, I already have a computer, so enhance the way I use my computer, not develop a device to replace my computer.

    Please?

    cummon, if the consumer is going to buy it, the hardware company should listen to them and what they want.

    --
    Spring is here. Don't believe me, look outside!
  45. No, make it even simpler by BillyGoatThree · · Score: 2

    Forget the browser. Just add a "terminal client" (like X or something). Let it run against my "real" computer in the other room/across town. Then you don't even really need a processor to run apps. The tablet is really just a display and input device.
    --

    --
    324006
    1. Re:No, make it even simpler by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1

      This is pretty much fan-boy speculation, but speaks to your idea anyway: since Mac OS X is Unix based, it is really desgined to project desktops remotely over pretty thin connections. Add in an Airport card, already enabled in X, and you have much of what you're looking for--a thin client that is simply displaying your session, while the heavy lifter within range of your Airport enabled handheld, or even remotely over the Internet as long as there is a local Ariport Hub, is processing. You could have a handheld with virtually only a tiny screen, an Airport card, and just enough a proc to run the card.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
  46. Re:hey troll by HeUnique · · Score: 2

    Commodore Sold around 10.5 million commodore 64's (thats including the 64 module, the SX 64 module, and the C64S module)..

    I don't think that Apple has sold iMacs more then Commodore did, but then again - Commodore is dead (as we knew it) and Apple is still alive..

    --
    Hetz (Heunique)
  47. Re:Web Enabled Toaster - I want one! by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    .. Then they send you your toast via UPS

  48. It's not an R&D drop by Hanzie · · Score: 2

    3Com isn't ditching R&D, they just realized that nobody was buying the stuff because it is way too expensive, and they can't make any money at acceptible price points.

    R&D on wireless connectivity, for example, is continuing hardcore. What R&D is in Audrey or Kerbango? About zip. They're just linux boxen running limited, dedicated apps.

    With expensive build components.

    --
    ********* sig: If you don't like the law, get filthy stinking rich, and buy a better one.
    1. Re:It's not an R&D drop by Tyger · · Score: 1

      But Audrey doesn't run Linux. It runs QNX IIRC. (Don't recall, I'm not in that group) And part of R&D is development. And there is plenty of research.

  49. "Kerbango"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Isn't that what Terl ate/drank/ingested in "Battlefield Earth"?

    Damn, that Xenu guy is everywhere...

  50. Re:Web Enabled Toaster - I want one! by Hanzie · · Score: 2

    Acutally, you have a pretty good idea. Just modify it slightly. I cook a lot of microwave rice, and I finally worked out a good program for my own cooker. 8 minutes on power level 10, then 12 minutes on 3.

    I would love to be able to throw my food in, and hit one button.

    --
    ********* sig: If you don't like the law, get filthy stinking rich, and buy a better one.
  51. Kerbango may be dead... but check out iM Networks by gonzojl · · Score: 1

    I'd actually much prefer the Internet Radio being produced by Philips. Check it out at http://www.internet-audio.philips.com/main/.

    Its got the iM Networks turning service, as well as all the regular features of a boombox (CD Player, regular radio, tape player, etc). Unfortunatetly the beta period is over, but its something to look forward to. I played around with a demo model and it was leaps and bounds better than the kerbango.

    - Jeff

  52. It has the wrong stuf and is too EXPENSIVE! by autocracy · · Score: 2
    Quoting from C|NET...

    3Com on Wednesday said it will discontinue Audrey, its Web-surfing appliance. Audrey's quick demise--the $499 device debuted in October--is the latest evidence of a growing trend. Namely, consumers don't want simplified computing devices for surfing the Web, or at least they don't want them yet.

    OK, we want simplified stuff. But consider that an E-machine does so much more than the Audrey (and the name isn't as pathetic - "Hey mommie, I'm going to go play with Audrey in my room"), and at the same cost. Sure, the Audrey is "portable", but that is rather limited by battery life. And besides, you can't load your own software onto that thing anyhow.

    What Mr. User, Joe wants is something that has either a NIC or a 56k modem (why pay for both, you'll only use one), runs an e-mail app and a webrowser, can be upgraded (in case some new "web trick" comes out - al a Flash or something), and COSTS WHAT IT SHOULD!

    Basically, remember that your market is people who don't want to pay for a full computer because they don't need it. Don't provide extra stuff and focus on the cost and keeping it useful throughout its life... How do you think Palm does so good?

    "Make that cable soldier! Orange stripe, orange - crimp and give me fifty!"

    --
    SIG: HUP
    1. Re:It has the wrong stuf and is too EXPENSIVE! by Ian+Bicking · · Score: 2
      What Mr. User, Joe wants is something that has either a NIC or a 56k modem (why pay for both, you'll only use one)
      If you have a 56k modem, you might as well put the NIC in there as well. NICs are so simple and cheap, it seems bizarre that they aren't included standard in nearly everything (laptops, desktops, consoles, etc). It's forward-compatible -- except for the possibility of a wireless network, 10/100baseT ethernet seems like the local network standard for a long time to come. Few technologies just work so darn well as ethernet does.
  53. Bullshit to your (Bullshit to your bullshit) by CargoCult · · Score: 1

    Actually your comment was fine, just liked the title - is bullshit associative and/or commutative?

    --
    **Vanuatu or bust**
  54. Did they hurt anybody when they dropped them? by human+bean · · Score: 2

    Internet appliances were supposed to be the next heavy market for consumer electronics. One wonders if 3COM dropped theirs on top VP of market development...

    --

    *whup* "Get along, little electrons. Heeyah!"

  55. NetPliance by DivideByZero · · Score: 1

    OK, if I grasp what you're saying, it's that any Internet Appliance maker that tries to produce a system on a nonstandard OS is doomed from the start.
    You procede this by stating how NetPliance made all sorts of mistakes.
    But their iOpeners ran on Pentium processors, using a preexsisting OS - QNX.
    And the /. crew took them to town, and rode them practically into bankruptcy.
    (Note: I own a hacked iOpener! @wheee!)
    So, any developer who uses nonstandard hardware will be crippled.
    Any developer who uses standard hardware at a profit won't be able to compete with the eMachines crowd.
    Any developer who uses standard hardware, subsidized down to appliance level will be drug under by the modification crowd.

    I guess Net Appliances ARE dead.

    1. Re:NetPliance by fmaxwell · · Score: 4
      While QNX was a pre-existing operating system, it was/is hardly an industry standard. Just look at the dearth of software, commercial, open source, freeware, shareware, etc. available for it. Choosing an OS that does not enjoy industry-wide support is suicidal.

      Having standard hardware did not hurt Netpliance. What hurt them was selling the i-opener at a tremendous loss ($400 manufacturing cost and $100 sales price) in the hope that they would make up the cost in overpriced Internet access fees. If the device had been priced at $450, I don't think that either of us would have bought them to hack. But Netpliance was, in essence, paying hackers $300 to find a way to hack it. At the same time, by only taking $100 from "real users", there was little commitment on the part of the users. They had no big investment in making this work. With high monthly fees (partially to offset the loss from the sale of the units), there was a real incentive for their users, many of whom were older and on a fixed income or otherwise not well off financially, to cancel the service to save money.

      Netpliance should have sold the hardware at, or just above, cost and used Linux and open source software. For those that would prefer to make their own box, Netpliance should have made a bootable CD-ROM that could run on a "standard" PC (for which they could have produced a hardware specification). Storage of settings, e-mail, etc. could have been on a floppy disk (or flash in their custom box). They could have even sold a custom keyboard (with Pizza key) for everyone who wanted to put a PC on their network. They could have given the disks away and half the geeks on the planet would have cobbled together boxes to put grandma on the net. Netpliance could have charged a $19.95/month fee for access, push content, software updates, etc. and not started off $300 in the hole. Then when grandma forgot (for the 53rd time) how to send e-mail, they would have fielded the tech support call. And if grandma lost interest, got Alzheimer's, or died in a year, Netpliance would not be out all that money.

      It's the AOL model with a twist: You provide pre-chewed content with a simplified interface and lots of tech support for a high price. The difference is that AOL requires a real computer while this could have been done with an appliance at a lower cost while shielding your users from the complexity of the OS in a way that AOL cannot.

      The Internet appliance market is viable. It just needs some common sense engineering and marketing to make it work. Selling $400 worth of custom hardware for $100 -- with no minimum commitment for service -- is no way to become profitable. This is especially true when your target market consists largely of people likely to find that they don't use, like, or want Internet access.

    2. Re:NetPliance by fmaxwell · · Score: 2
      They sold it for $299. The $100 price was a promotional price at its launch.

      The price at its launch (on July 16, 1999) was not $99 as you claim, but was, instead, $399 as shown in this CNet announcement. At the time, Netpliance was calling it the "Ipad." By December of 1999, they had dropped the price to $199 as shown in this PC Magazine news story.In July of 2000, Netpliance announced that they were raising the price of the i-opener from $99 to $399 as shown in this Netpliance press release and in this CNet news article. At the end of August, after dismal sales, Netpliance lowered the price to $299 as shown in this CNet news article. I believe that they sold more i-openers at $99 than at all of the other price points combined.

      Next time, get your facts straight before claiming that I am wrong.

    3. Re:NetPliance by gizzmo · · Score: 1

      Net appliances will take off when every company who wants to make one quits trying to bundle it with their crap 56k modem-based service. Give me a device with an 8" or so screen that can wirelessly access any website or email account through my existing $40/mo cable service, and sell it for $299, and I'll be first in line to buy one for myself and everyone in my family. The concept of a PC-in-every-room is just not practical. Large scale home networks are too bulky and expensive. But if I could have an Audrey-type device in every room without having to pay for another service provider, I'd gladly do it. Until the hardware is cheap enough that they don't have to subsidize it with a bundled service, people aren't going to flock to these devices en masse.

  56. I put a laptop in my parent's kitchen. by Caffeinated · · Score: 1

    Old Toshiba P75 w/ 48mb RAM. Perfect for sitting on the counter, little e-mail, little news, etc.

    - - - - -

    --

    - - - - -
    automatictaxistopelectriccigarettelovebaby
  57. The best web pad/appliance by smartin · · Score: 2

    I've looked at all these pretty closely with the following criteria in mind:

    1) It has to fit into my existing home network, work with exiting machines, access my existing files, ...

    2) It has to be portable. This means wireless (802.11b please) and run on recharable batterys.

    3) It has to have a good screen, at least 800x600 and half decent input cabablilites.

    4) I just want the hardware, i don't want to buy any service to go with it.

    After checking out the latest offerings i found exactly what i was looking for. It's called a laptop and it works great! Seriously, if you are thinking about a web pad forget it. Go get an old laptop, anything over about a pentium 133 with a reasonable amount of memory in it is fine as an appliance. Load linux on it, get an wireless access point and pc-card and you are laughing.

    --
    The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
  58. What to do now? by heroine · · Score: 3

    What are we supposed to do now? Pay $960 for a motherboard? PC makers stopped production and component makers jacked up prices because everyone wanted appliances and now appliance makers stop production. Pretty soon we'll be milking our own cows.

    1. Re:What to do now? by lostguy · · Score: 1

      No, we have to destroy the cows. You'll be milking your dog. Just be sure it's female.

  59. Shy Advertising? by rho · · Score: 2
    3Com wasn't shy about advertising Audrey. The company placed ads in a number of magazines and featured it in television slots. 3Com sold Audrey directly, but was also signing up retail partners.

    Not shy about advertising? Then how come I've never heard of the thing? Not to sound like an arrogant prick, but I tend to keep up with things like this, and this is the first time I've ever seen the thing.

    Crikey, does 3Com have rhesus monkeys running their marketing department? What is the target market for the Audrey? Grandma? Grandpa? Not yet -- get them in the hands of nerds and the technoratti. Did they even buy an ad on Slashdot?

    Get some buzz going first. This is a neat-o device -- expensive, but I can think up several dozen uses for it once the price comes down.

    Now, the Internet radio is plain stupid. It deserved to die.
    "Beware by whom you are called sane."

    --
    Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
  60. Gates was right by Double+Invagination · · Score: 1
    Microsoft has been saying this for a while -- people want the flexibility og a general purpose computer. Naturally this argument is self-serving for M$, but at the cost points in question, it's irrefutable.

    As has been said repeatedly in this discussion, the issue is price-point. Palms don't cost as much as laptops, so they sell. High-end WinCE devices (with keyboards and larger screens) dont' sell becuuse they're in the same price range as low-end laptops, which are much more useful.

    --
    "It must be something truly enormous, Trismegistus"
  61. Real need is a Geekpliance by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
    All the flaming of 3Com for the lame product misses the point that you are not the target market for internet appliaces if you read slashdot. Unfortunately for 3Com though the type of person who pays early adopter prices for kool gadgets is a slashdot reader type.

    OK so 3Com was doomed from the start. What should they have built?

    I think there is a market out there for a 'Geekpliance' built on a WiFi (802.11b) enabled cpu, some memory and some I/O, specifically audio in/out, vga display and USB. It should be possible to plug in a cheap (read IDE) drive of choice and memory.

    Now this can be had in many motherboard stores, but I also want the thing to fit in a case that looks good. I don't want it to look like I have a cheap PC.

    Something that I could program to work like a Tivo but without the ability to upgrade to the hard drive size of my choice and to use free TV listings from the web rather than the tivo service.

    Also somethin I can program to download and play stuff from the house media server on demand.

    A laptop motherboard might be a good start. But they tend to get very hot in operation and I don't want the expense of an LCD display - it won't be used.

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  62. It was the scientoligists! by Ambush · · Score: 1
    It was due to a C&D letter from those wacky scientoligists. I mean, calling it a 'Kerbango internet radio'. As if they'd let 3COM get away with such a blatant IP violation!

    ;-)

    --
    There are 10 kinds of people; those who know ternary, those who don't, and those now hunting for a dictionary.
    1. Re:It was the scientoligists! by Fatal0E · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you had good intentions when you posted this but enough with the fuckin scientologists.

  63. Re:Kerbango may be dead... but check out iM Networ by Let's+Kiosk · · Score: 1
    Has anybody checked out an Internet radio called the iRAD? It looked promising but unfortunately has an even worse price-point problem than Kerbango -- they originally were selling them for $399, and now I think they're more than $100 higher than that.

    Any idea what Phillips will sell its radio for?

  64. Actually.... by the_argent · · Score: 1

    The coolest thing about the Kerbango was that it was an internet radio, and FM radio, and was able to map out a drive containing MP3's on the network (the kerbango had a NIC built in) and play them as well.
    I agree, it was pricy at $400, but it was more of a PC than most web appliances I've seen. And I think it ran off a linux kernel, and was able to recieve upgrades when it talked to the Kerbango website.
    I was actually thinking of picking one up.

  65. ePods by jdev · · Score: 1
    There is not a good out-of-the-box webpad yet, but I have the next best thing running at my home. It's called an ePod. It runs Windows CE 2.11, has a 640x480 touch screen, 16MB, 2USB ports, infrared, serial, CompactFlash, and a PC Card slot. The company that makes them ran out of business, but they are very hackable. I put a 802.11b card in it and hooked it up to my home network. The performance was a little sluggish, so I set up Windows Terminal Server and loaded up the terminal client. Now the thing is like having a wirelss monitor for my Win2k server. Since the thing was on clearance, I got it for only $200. It's awesome.

    I can definitely see why the Audrey will be discontinued. It was an interesting concept, but it was expensive and didn't do much. Once somebody can come out with an affordable tablet device with wireless networking built in, these things will become more popular. Until then, I'll be enjoying my ePod.

  66. Re:Web Enabled Toaster - I want one! by gmhowell · · Score: 1

    No offense, but what's the point of a microwave if it takes longer than a stove?

    Rice: bring water to boil, throw in rice, lower heat to simmer. Cover. Wait fifteen minutes.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  67. Tethered+ISP Contract = Failed Internet Appliance by KoSpdX · · Score: 1

    For a successful Internet appliance, it needs to be wireless and able to share an existing ISP connection. I-Opener was doomed from the start. It relied on users subscribing to long-term ISP contracts, which many people would shy away from. Most people who would purchase a special-purpose Internet appliance already have an ISP. It does not make sense for someone to pay an additional $19.95/month for a service he already has.

    One of the benefits of having an Internet appliance is to have convenient access to the Internet from anywhere in the house (or outside). A tethered appliance, such as the 3Com Audrey forces users to browse the Net within reach of a telephone jack. If users have DSL or Cable, they're out of luck. Devices like this are doomed to fail.

    Truly wireless IA's have so far been nothing but vaporware. I think that it will take a large corporation like Intel with their Web Tablet to deliver a solution that meets these criteria, at a price affordable to people.
    Until then, tethered, ISP contract bound Internet appliances will continue to fail.

  68. Should I take credit? by Hiawatha · · Score: 1

    I kinda wrote a scorching critical essay about the Audrey after trying out a loaner. Considering that 3Com has a well earned rep for good design, I was dismayed by how utterly awful the Audrey was. It had the worst keyboard in the recorded history of sentient lifeforms on this planet. And if that weren't enough, its screen wasn't wide enough to display a typical Web page. You actually had to scroll from side to side constantly. There's simply no excuse for design this lame. I know a lot of work went into it, and it even had some good features, like the way it automatically scarfed up your e-mail, then blinked at you to come and get it. I truly feel sorry for the well-intentioned geeks who worked so hard on it. But frankly, Audrey deserved to die. And ah hepped.

    --

    Hiawatha Bray

    Tech Reporter

    Boston Globe

  69. No real suprise by Faux_Pseudo · · Score: 1

    This dosn't come as too big of a suprise.
    In my opinnion until you can get 50% of the population to understand what "broadband"
    is you won't have a markitable population that will be educated or enough to understand the
    differances between a webpad and a palm pilot.

    I knew that odds were I would never see a kerbango until every computer came with a
    built in ethernet port. Tell people its a raido
    and they are interested. Tell them they can get over a hunderd didgatal chanels and the love it.
    Tell them that they have to install a eth card and they don't want the trouble.

    I would love to see any and all of these gadgets
    in the market place but untill you can produce them cheap enough to find there way into a Pic-N-Save (something like Walmart meets a 99 cent store) a standerd has not been established. And with out a standerd the unwashed masses can't
    wrap their hands/walets around it.

  70. Bad price point by Animats · · Score: 2
    "Internet appliances" may work, but not at a price point just below a PC.

    The "Internet radio" idea is interesting. Now make one with a channel selector, a volume control, and a one-line display.

  71. The current crop certainly are too expensive by Keslin · · Score: 1

    I just happened to stop by Best Buy tonight looking for something else, and stumbled upon a couple of the new consumer-oriented net appliances. They sure are neat, but I was amazed at how expensive they were. Who other than an ubergeek is going to spend $500 on a box for sticking in front of the toilet for reading web sites? For these things to work, the price really needs to drop in a big way. For $150 or so, I would have them all over my house. For $500, they are going to sit at Best Buy for a very long time.

    I was also amazed at the poor quality of the screens, but I suppose that has something to do with an attempt to keep the price down, so I can't complain. I did really like the little navigation knob doohickey on one of them, very neat feature for quick instant-on web site checking.

    -Keslin, the naked nerd girl

    --

    -Keslin, the naked nerd girl
  72. smart my ass. by Malcontent · · Score: 2

    They paid 80 million for kerbango and then shelved it. They just wasted 80 million of their shareholders dollars and got nothing in return. Not my idea of smart.

    --

    War is necrophilia.

  73. buying coop formed by AndrewSchaefer · · Score: 1

    I hve formed a coop for buying these units. If you are interested in buying one or more, join the mailing list at audrey-coop@yahoogroups.com

  74. Re:3Com dropping HomeConnect Webcam may be good ne by tagish · · Score: 1
    I'm currently working on one of the drivers and have made pretty reasonable progress reverse engineering the data format. I'm working on the fine details of all the non-image communication that passes between the camera and the host now. Anyone who's interested is welcome to lend a hand...

    I wasn't aware that people had actually been frightened off by DMCA/UCITA -- do you have any references for this? Not doubting you; just hadn't heard about it. Vista Imaging do claim (here and here) that they don't want to release a driver because of their proprietary image encoding format (which they style as 'compression' -- it's actually a moderately novel way of encoding a chrominance sub channel in the luminance data without increasing its size). Obviously I'd be interested to hear about any legal problems, and also interested to hear how they might affect me, given that I'm in the UK.

    --
    Andy Armstrong
  75. Re:Web Enabled Toaster - I want one! by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
    No offense, but what's the point of a microwave if it takes longer than a stove?

    I've never tried microwaving rice, but I imagine one nice aspect would be that it shuts itself off.

    I cook rice 3 or 4 days a week, and at least once a week I get so caught up in something after I've put it on the stove, that I don't realize how much time has gone by until I have nothing but a pot of smoking mush.

    Now my parents have a magnetic induction stove that seems to be the best of both worlds in the decidedly on-topic rice-cooking regard: It cooks like a stove but can be programmed to shut itself off.

    --
    "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  76. Where's the blowout buy by tyrani · · Score: 1

    Where would be a good place to look for one of the audrey tablets at a "blow out" price?

    I realize that 3com's site has them, but where should I look for them in a couple of weeks when 3com dumps these units?

    --
    rejected (19) accepted (0)
    Is there a psychological term related to getting your stories rejected on slashdot?
  77. THIS IS WHAT I WANT! by V'alien · · Score: 1

    An 802.11b WIRELESS Internet tab so I can sit by my TV and type in website links for cheat codes for my PS2 instead of running to my office in the back room and typing it up on my system.

    Also so i can chat via IRC or AIM/ICQ from the tablet while doing stuff in the kitchen or what not.

    That's what i want.

    Where can i get one?

  78. Re:Tethered+ISP Contract = Failed Internet Applian by Bantik · · Score: 1

    Yes, the Audrey has to be tethered. No, you're not out of luck if you have DSL or Cable. I have an old Power Computing clone with 2 ethernet cards that acts as a software router and DHCP server. One hub is in the office, providing desktop connectivity. A line goes upstairs to another hub in the kitchen, where the Audrey lives (and where I can work from my laptop). The Audrey does have its problems, but it's far from useless.

    --
    Ruby on Rails resources and more at idolhands.com
  79. don't get me started by underwhelm · · Score: 2

    I'll admit, you might have me on cutsey UI, if you're just thinking about stock OS X. But with the option to run Linux and windows, and the likely flexibility of the OS X UI, I can have any UI I want.

    Firewire. USB. PCMCIA. Up to 1 gig of ram. The only things I can't upgrade are the CPU and the video card... It's a damn sight better than Audrey, and a lot more portable than my desktop systems. With my 1.3" thick Cannon scanner, Tascam US-428 and a digital video camera, I can produce a [insert creative endeavor] anywhere that there's enough oxygen for me to run the devices.

    I know, you were just joking... but even I'm overwhelmed by the versatility and usefulness of this gadget. It's the 200 lb. gorilla of swiss-army-knives-that-we-call-general-purpose-com puters in a one-inch-thin sack (to blend my metaphors).

    --

    I don't need large brains to have a good time.

  80. Re:Tethered+ISP Contract = Failed Internet Applian by KoSpdX · · Score: 1

    Look at the additional investment that you made in order to have roaming connectivity throughout your house. Should all Internet appliances require such infrastructure? I think not. I just cannot see the justification in buying a tethered Internet appliance that will crash when loading large web pages, not support different media types, and cost more than a PC. For this market to take off, there needs to be incentive to buy. Form factor and ads will only take a product so far, freedom, robustness, and ease of use will take it the rest of the way.