Slashdot Mirror


Comdex Bans Bags From Show Floor

ckd writes: "CNET is reporting that COMDEX organizers have a new security policy--no bags except vendor supplied plastic bags will allowed on the show floor. "While on-site, you should CARRY A PHOTO ID (DRIVER'S LICENSE OR PASSPORT) ON YOU AT ALL TIMES." They want you to leave your laptop in your hotel room, too! Oh, and no cameras at the keynotes, either. But they haven't announced that they're planning to strip search people ... yet."

454 comments

  1. strip searches?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    "they haven't announced that they're planning to strip search people"

    I'm sure no one will mind. It will be the only action the geeks get anyway.

    1. Re:strip searches?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strip searching is good...

    2. Re:strip searches?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, thats hick.org, not the goatse.cx IP, no matter what nslookup tells you

  2. Angry Dot Bombers by Poppageorgio · · Score: 1

    I know we're angry, unemployed techies, but I don't think we would blow up a place of reverence.

    --
    Me fail English? That's unpossible!
    1. Re:Angry Dot Bombers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Farooq, what will we do now that the American-infadels have stopped allowing us to take box-cutters on their planes?

      I don't know, Achmed... perhaps we can go to COMDEX with box-cutters in paper bags?

      Alla be praised, they will never suspect!

  3. Sounds good to me! by QuiK_ChaoS · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just like a baseball game. For the best. Except it will be much harder to collect all those freebie's. I mean really, is it that much to give up?

    Should we induce stipsearching? Could cause an uprising in Comdex popularity.

    1. Re:Sounds good to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Should we induce stipsearching? Could cause an uprising in Comdex popularity."

      Only if the babes/models on the sales floor are the ones doing the stripping.

      Most of the regular geek attendees.... uhh, well, let's just say food sales may drop if they are the only ones stripping :)

    2. Re:Sounds good to me! by ErikTheRed · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'll even voulenteer to make very, very certain that none of the booth babes are smuggling in anything even remotely dangerous. Yup, I'll be quite thorough; you never know what they might be hiding in those tight little outfits...

      --

      Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    3. Re:Sounds good to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stupid man.

    4. Re:Sounds good to me! by cloudmaster · · Score: 2

      When I last went, I walked around carrying not one, but *2* knives. One on my keyring and one on my leatherman. Oh, the days when my leatherman only had one blade... Would my wave tool be considered 2 blades now (3/4 counting the scissors), I wonder? Anyway, I'm sure I'd go to jail for bringing a fully automatic stabbing assult device to a public place now (not that it's ever stabbed anyone but me, mind you).

      Kinda dissapointing that no one will be giving away multi-tools. Just think of the havoc that could have been caused with the screwdrivers given away by the networking company whose name I forget! "Look out, he's got a tool!"

    5. Re:Sounds good to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "He tried to enter Comdex carrying four knives...all of varying lengths and blade design."

  4. It's a ploy.... by case_igl · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...because all the companies exhibiting at COMDEX are so broke they can't afford to give me new t-shirts. What a clever way to save money on promo items!

    But, what am I supposed to wear for the next year!?! I guess my Penguin Computing T-shirts will have to be worn twice!

  5. Too Far by Oracle+of+Bandwidth · · Score: 1, Insightful

    On one hand security is good in the wake of events in the close past, but on the other hand when does an event miss it's point for security?

  6. They Still Have a COmdex? by Greyfox · · Score: 3, Funny

    I remember going to that thing! Wow! It started going out of style around '94 or so. I thought they'd have given up by now...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  7. Where can I sign up?? by KaiserSoze69 · · Score: 0, Troll

    I want to strip search the booth babes! Like the ones that IOMEGA had a few years back ;-)

    1. Re:Where can I sign up?? by ByteHog · · Score: 1

      Damn ya beat me too it. :) Hmm.. I *could* strip search bill gates:

      "What do you mean you're missing your wallet? I never saw it. Please move along sir, I see some booth bunni... err i mean Booth Attendents coming this way. They get priority."

      --
      - This isn't the sig you're looking for. Move along, move along..
    2. Re:Where can I sign up?? by Rudeboy777 · · Score: 1

      That would be a nice reversal of fortune, usually Bill Gates has his hand in MY wallet.

      --

      From hell's heart I fstab at /dev/hdc

  8. Shows by thetechweenie · · Score: 1

    This is suprising. At the Itech show in Boston, they weren't very strict. I was supposed to setup for the show on 9/11. It was held at the Boston WTC. This was obviously not done. They closed that day, and the show was a month later. I don't see why they would think that a Comdex show would be targeted.

    --


    Um, this is my sig.
  9. No bags? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does that mean the wife stays at home?

    Seriously....what it means is no backpacks or carry cases, like the ones we routinely shoulder for carrying those 7lb. notebooks around. You know, the ones you left at home, rather than bring on the plane?

    If course, a two-way video cell-phone is a different matter altogether.

    But then Comdex is liable to be a bit light on attendance, by both vendors and prospective clients, this year, me thinks. Monitoring the crowd with face scanning stations should be that much easier, seeing as this is the first year for it.

  10. No laptops? by Rob.Mathers · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can understand a no bags policy, but barring people from entering COMDEX (fricken tech show for pete's sake) with laptops is just stupid. I note (IIRC) it doesn't say anything about PDAs, but still, wtf were they thinking? A better idea would be to have people turn it on quickly at the door (although this might slow things down a lot).

    --

    My other sig is funny!
    1. Re:No laptops? by bytor4232 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it would probably be easy to make a Palm into a detonator wouldn't it.

      --
      -- 4 8 15 16 23 42
    2. Re:No laptops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they are concerned that if you gutted a large thick old laptop and packed it tight with C4 (like dynamite, ONLY BETTER!), you would have a pretty nasty bomb that could kill a few dozen people maybee? Paranoid perhaps, but thats post 9/11 life, sad to say.

    3. Re:No laptops? by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      You don;t have abag to carry it in, so I wouldn;t really want my laptop there, realistically.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    4. Re:No laptops? by philipm · · Score: 0, Funny

      yeay, bitch you're at five now, but wait until Troll Tuesday!

      Oh wait, what's that you say? It IS Troll Tuesday!

      You are all WORSE THAN HITLER, and if I ever meet you I WILL KICK YOUR ASS!!!!

    5. Re:No laptops? by the_brat_king · · Score: 1

      If you were to take your average PDA, pack it with C4 (Plastique), and adjust it so that it were to deliver a 12V charge (I don't know amps or watts), then you could floor about a reasonable shopping mall... I think a laptop repacked would REALLY REALLY hurt.

    6. Re:No laptops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you had a whole laptop filled with c4 you would do more than a few dozen people, unless you are in the desert or in the middle of the Atlantic ocean.

      A whole laptop would level a good sized building.

      -KS

    7. Re:No laptops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it would be more fun to fill it with gas

    8. Re:No laptops? by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • I can understand a no bags policy, but barring people from entering COMDEX with laptops is just stupid

      It's not really inconsistent. The policy is clearly intented to cover anything that can conceal or contain something nasty. Expect to see anyone wearing a Matrix trenchcoat stopped and searched as well. If you ban bags, you have to ban everything else as well.

      Of course, being consistent doesn't mean that the entire policy isn't risible. If you're of the calibre of the September 11th hijackers, or a typical Hammas suicide bomber, you'll just strap explosives all over you, throw on a jacket, bring your perfectly valid passport, waddle right through the door, then turn the floor into an abbatoir.

      To those joking that only strip searches will solve the problem: it's not a joke. And by strip searches, I mean a goon squad who will grab you from behind, throw you down and tazer you if you so much as blink. It's untenable, but anything short of that is window dressing for the benefit of those attendees who don't really want to think about the scale of the problem, they just want to feel protected.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    9. Re:No laptops? by tarkin · · Score: 1

      It used to be BladeRunner trenchcoat, NOT Matrix trenchcoat ;-)

      --
      blaah !
    10. Re:No laptops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't know what you're talking about.

      C4 is a powerful explosive but an average PDA packed with the stuff couldn't "floor about a shopping mall". It would most probably be enought to kill you if you were holding it though.

    11. Re:No laptops? by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 5, Informative

      A PDA full of C4 can level a shopping mall? Hello? Have you ever even used C4?

      A PDA (and let's assume it's a big one like one of the Casios) full of C4 would have a hard time levelling a decent sized mini-van.

      Even if you packed it 2/3 full with C4 and the remainder with BBs or other shrapnel, you would be lucky to take down more than the few geeks clustered around you.

      C4 is neat stuff, but it's just not that powerful.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    12. Re:No laptops? by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

      how do you propose to get it into the building? Ideally, you keep the computer functional, in case you get searched.

    13. Re:No laptops? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      A PDA (and let's assume it's a big one like one of the Casios) full of C4 would have a hard time levelling a decent sized mini-van.

      Is C4 exponential or logarithmic or whatever like TNT is? (I know, I know, I should learn more math so I can keep my terms straight, but right now I just want to find out the answer to the question.)

      In hollywood movies we always see packs of C4 about the size of a full-height hard drive taking out a bridge stanchion (or really most of the bridge) - How much would you actually need for something like that?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:No laptops? by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      That's correct, a small, shaped charge of C4 can take out a bridge support, if the charge is applied directly to the bridge support.

      The message I replied to made iti sound like a terrorist could walk into a shopping mall, pull out his Palm Pilot filled with C4, press the detonate button and blow up a shopping mall (I believe he said level a shopping mall).

      In reality, a charge that small would break a lot of windows, give people a headache and possibly injure/kill one or two people who really close by, assuming that the glass from the display screen were driven into their body by the force of the explosion.

      The good news is that the terrorist would probably not survive.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
  11. Hard to blame them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You might complain about the inconveniences, but put things in perspective. Isn't giving up your ability to carry a silly little bag worth it knowing that you won't be blown up by a hidden bomb. After all it is well known that technical conferences are a magnet for Islamic terrorists and right-wing horror groups like the Montana Militia and Operation Rescue.

    1. Re:Hard to blame them by technos · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Isn't giving up your ability to carry a silly little bag worth it knowing that you won't be blown up by a hidden bomb.

      Nope. I will carry a bag with me and be secure in its contents wherever I goddamn please. I pay damn good money every goddamn year to make sure I don't have to worry. Unfortunatly, the morons I give my money to are more interested in fucking spying on everyone than making me safe.

      "Gee, lets continue to sell fertilizer and fuel oil to cash customers, even though we just had a building blown up with it! Even though these guys need a license to store it, we won't require a license nor even proof of identity to buy it! Oh, but we better spend a few more billion tapping everyones email. Oh, and after you get done reviewing everyone's cell phone conversations for the words "The Eagle Is Blue, Mustafa" you might want to look into stopping the sale of anthrax to nations on the known hostile list. Just make sure you get all the cell calls first, mmkay? Oh, and if you get any more phone sex calls like that last batch, save em for the office party on Friday."

      Oh, and I can't just stop paying them. How's that for a contractual fuckup??!?!

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
    2. Re:Hard to blame them by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 1

      You might complain about the inconveniences, but put things in perspective. Isn't giving up your ability to carry a silly little bag worth it knowing that you won't be blown up by a hidden bomb.

      Yeah, wouldn't want to get killed by that! (odds of dying due to bomb - 1 in 100,000,000).

      That's why I leave my stuff in my car! (odds of dying in a car crash - 1 in 1000?)

      Plus, when I go into the parking lot to grab my camera, I can grab a smoke! (odds of dying from smoking - 1 in 5 or so...)

    3. Re:Hard to blame them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "How's that for a contractual fuckup"

      I dunno, but you sure seem to be a fuckup.

    4. Re:Hard to blame them by psamuels · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Do you honestly think anyone buying nitrate fertilizer for the purpose of blowing up a building will already have a criminal record or an open FBI investigation? Or do you believe it is OK to deny farmers the right to buy the supplies they need just because they belong to a particular organisation (read: "militia") viewed by the left as suspicious? In other words, do you really think that restrictions on buying the ingredients for an ANFO bomb would be either practical or effective?

      You could go further, you know. Don't let anyone buy gasoline (a very popular substance for arson - not to mention the main ingredient in napalm!) without photo ID. Maybe have a five-day waiting period for buying gas, so they can check you out and make sure it's only for your car.

      What's that, you say? That would put an obnoxious and unnecessary burden on ordinary law-abiding citizens such as yourself?

      Oh, and I can't just stop paying them.

      Unlike the former USSR, the US gives you the right to emigrate, pretty much no-questions-asked. [Now, the right to immigrate to another country without making the proper arrangements might be another thing altogether, but that's the other country's bailiwick.] Oddly enough, it seems that very few of the people who claim to have such serious grievances against our government take advantage of this amazing offer. Might you all be ... *gasp* ... bluffing?

      --
      "How can you claim that you are anti-crack, while still writing a window manager?" — Metacity README
    5. Re:Hard to blame them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Unlike the former USSR, the US gives you the right to emigrate, pretty much no-questions-asked. . . . Oddly enough, it seems that very few of the people who claim to have such serious grievances against our government take advantage of this amazing offer. Might you all be ... *gasp* ... bluffing?
      I aint fucking bluffing, I am out of here the instant I find a job in a better country. (anyone looking for an intern in film post-production? live in a cool country?)
    6. Re:Hard to blame them by dlb · · Score: 1


      Sounds like you don't travel much. Let us know when you find a "better country" to live in.

    7. Re:Hard to blame them by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      Do you honestly think anyone buying nitrate fertilizer for the purpose of blowing up a building will already have a criminal record or an open FBI investigation?

      Who buys? I suspect that if someone wanted to obtain a large quantity of fertilizer and/or fuel oil it would not be too difficult to simply steal it from some farm sites here and there. I don't imagine that the average farmer has armed guards, razor wire fences and dobermans guarding his storage sheds and slip tanks.

      If you want to cover your tracks and leave no evidence behind, it is probably simplest and best to steal that sort of thing rather than trying to purchase it and possibly leave behind either a witness or a receipt or record of some kind. Or maybe even a photo if the store has electronic cameras. None of that would be a problem on the average farm. Depending on the farm and farmer, a theft might even go un-noticed for some time.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    8. Re:Hard to blame them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe you don't travel much. Ever live outside the U.S.?

    9. Re:Hard to blame them by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Isn't giving up your ability to carry a silly little bag worth it knowing that you won't be blown up by a hidden bomb.

      You just pointed out the major fallacy with almost all of the 'heightened security' measures put in place after 9/11. There is absolutely no way to 'know' (ie guarantee) that you'll not be blown up. Everyone assumes that security measures are perfect; they're not. Witness the Nepalese citizen arrested yesterday in O'Hare with knives, a stungun, and mace on him _after_ passing thru security. Most, if not all, of the restrictions put in place are nothing more than feel good measures meant to make the public _feel_ secure, regardless if they're really more secure or not.

      I watched a VA National Guard soldier and a county cop chase down a guy at Richmond International Airport yesterday and demand to see his ID because he bypassed the escalators (which most people use) and headed for the elevator. This guy had _left_ the security area!

      As has been quoted many times, those willing to give up a little liberty for the perception of safety deserve, and will have, neither. I would much rather allow anyone on a plane without being searched and have at least one undercover Air Marshal onboard every flight to deal with any problems that might arise (including the ones you can't screen for - air rage, drunkedness, etc) than search everyone and hope that the security measures on the ground were sufficient.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    10. Re:Hard to blame them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      okay, maybe sarcasm has escaped these poor souls... Obviously we are challenging a weak argument here, one often makes a weak argument by design to show the ludicrous nature of the ideals one attacks. Now calling dog-pile on a weak argument is just plain moronic.

    11. Re:Hard to blame them by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

      Had to pick an industry where the US is overwhelmingly dominant, didn't you?

  12. What is a COMdex? by Jin+Wicked · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is that anything like a ComicCon? If so, strip searching might not be the best idea.

    --
    My Webcomic: Asylum on 5th Street
    1. Re:What is a COMdex? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your best efforts at being humourous have failed. I am sorry to be the bearer of such bad news, sir. Enjoy your evening.

    2. Re:What is a COMdex? by kaimiike1970 · · Score: 1

      As have yours. Keep moving, nothing to see.

      --


      Do a google search before posting.
    3. Re:What is a COMdex? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ai papi!

  13. security vs absurdity by man_ls · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Honestly, I don't see the banning of non-Vendor bags as a "security" measure. I see it as a "protect-the-people-who-are-here-profit" measure. It may have aspects of both, but its definately more the second one. Why not just simply have a mandatory security screening of all carried items before they are allowed into the premesis?

    Attending COMDEX would be one of the things I look forward to most in my computing career. I'm only a highschool student now, but I hear very interesting things of the convention, and I'd enjoy talking to the vendors and seeing their flagship products firsthand. There's something about being able to see the new Athlon MP board, or a new video card, or the latest development in RAID technology, in person, that a catalog can't do, no matter how many pictures they put in.

    1. Re:security vs absurdity by asland · · Score: 1

      You should want to go to defcon or the like.

    2. Re:security vs absurdity by Cato+the+Elder · · Score: 1

      "Why not just simply have a mandatory security screening..."

      Because it is much harder to set up a screening process with X-rays/whatever and have everybody just go through than to ban all non-transparent bags.

      Yes, it sounds like a pain in the ass, but it is a simple security measure that would make it harder to walk in with a bomb and leave it lying around. (Remember the Atlanta Olympics?)

      I don't really see how "profit" enters into it.

    3. Re:security vs absurdity by enneff · · Score: 2

      Yeah, from what I gather at Defcon (and other "hacker" conferences) they actually try to spread knowledge!

    4. Re:security vs absurdity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      COMDEX is just not what it used to be. I used to be excited about it too, but in my view, its flavor has shifted over the years from vendors who are there primarily to exhibit their new and interesting technology to dominant players in the corpocracy pushing for ever-bigger market shares. It just doesn't seem nearly as cool nowadays. Maybe it's me that's changed; I dunno.

      In any event, the overboard security everywhere has made me generally avoid things that I was close to being on the fence about but would probably have attended otherwise. Old coders don't like being told that now they can't do some innocuous thing that they've always done before. I'll be skipping COMDEX.

    5. Re:security vs absurdity by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > Honestly, I don't see the banning of non-Vendor bags as a "security" measure. I see it as a "protect-the-people-who-are-here-profit" measure.

      No, no, you see, it's got nothing to do with that.

      You see, I just found out that COMDEX officials have a tape of Osama Bin Laden promising on Mohammed's grave that his terrorists will not slip their bombs into vendor-supplied bags, because Nostradamus (who co-wrote the Koran) said, in an apocryphal note, that only non-vendor-supplied bags were permissible for jihad warriors. Osama said it. COMDEX believes it. That makes it true!

      Or, OK, it's a way to make sure that you buy your food at the overpriced concession stands, and that the vendors who paid $10000 and up for the right to have their names put on bags, have a monopoly on the advertising space they've purchased between your ass and your knee.

  14. ah... by cyberwinds · · Score: 1

    I recon the safest way would be for everyone to walk/run/scream naked on the show.

    --
    Together, we are strong; Apart, we are stronger.
    1. Re:ah... by MentlFlos · · Score: 2

      But then the heating bill would be outragous :)

  15. stopgap by Karmageddon · · Score: 4, Interesting
    some of these precautions make sense in the short run, but in the longer run the terrorists will compensate. anybody as prepared as the Sept 11 hijackers will rent their own booth and will be bring in all the gear they need.

    somebody on the radio pointed out that as we get better and better at stopping individual acts, the response is for a smaller number of more dedicated enemy to plan more thoroughly. So, for example, the number of hijackings has long been on the decline, but the number of people killed in each hijacking has gone way up.

    anyway, in the particular case of hi-tech and shows like comdex, having the toys banned kinda takes the wind out of the whole affair.

    1. Re:stopgap by jallen02 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A thing thats always bothered me. I have carried an IPAQ on an airplane with me. Now you look at that IPAQ. Lets see, what have I had to do to get the IPAQ through the gates and onto the airplane? Well, I simply handed it to the guard and hit a button to make it turn on and off. You could simulate what would make your average security guard happy with hardly nothing. You could fit enough explosives, or, a small caliber pistol in the case of an IPAQ easy.

      It frigtens me how easy it is to get stuff right through the metal detectors, and through personal security checks. I shouldnt be afraid. I still fly, I know a determined terrorist could hijack a plane anyways.

      Oh well, jsut food for thought.

      jeremy

    2. Re:stopgap by krogoth · · Score: 2

      "somebody on the radio pointed out that as we get better and better at stopping individual acts, the response is for a smaller number of more dedicated enemy to plan more thoroughly. So, for example, the number of hijackings has long been on the decline, but the number of people killed in each hijacking has gone way up."

      It's one of the basic rules of security: you can't make things impossible, but you can reduce the number of people who can do them, up to a certain point. The only way to be completely secure from attacks is to be the last person alive on earth. Of course, this will make it harder for the theoretical terrorist who wants to attack a trade show, and you get the biggest effect when you cut off the easiest methods of attack.

      Also, to successfuly smuggle in weapons as a booth renter, they'd probably have to infiltrate an established company. The prices for entry are probably high enough that it would take a lot of resources to get their own booth. I don't their actions would stop anyone trying to attack the place, because they could always bring in hidden parts and put them together inside (even one person could do some damage).

      --

      They that quote Benjamin Franklin on liberty and safety deserve neither.
    3. Re:stopgap by kaimiike1970 · · Score: 1

      Why simulate? I have taken my powerbook apart and without compromising functionality I could fit enough c4 to devastate a plane. My cd drive bay alone is huge... This is why the security checkpoints are so ineffectual... Today at O'hare a man got through the checkpoint with 9 knives, a can of tear gas, and a stun gun.

      --


      Do a google search before posting.
    4. Re:stopgap by cjsnell · · Score: 2

      Well, the terrorists may *try* to bring their gear to the show but they will be appalled when they see the bill from the unionized workers who moved their stuff from the van to the booth. I'm sure that they have a "dangerous goods" charge that they'll tack on top of the extortionate rates that the unionized guys charge.

      (For those that don't already know, you cannot so much as wipe your ass at a convention center without getting in trouble with the Ass Wipers Local 570 union.)

    5. Re:stopgap by Jburkholder · · Score: 4, Interesting

      >Today at O'hare a man got through the checkpoint with 9 knives, a can of tear gas, and a stun gun.

      That is so not true!

      ... he only got 7 knives through at the checkpoint. The crack security staff confiscated 2 from him. The other 7 and the stun gun and mace were discovered during a random (yeah, right) carry-on check.

      Even better is the guy's claim that he accidentally left them in his bag and didn't mean to try to get them on the plane. Wouldn't the discovery of the first two jog your memory about the other 7?

      I live near Chicago and get to experience the airport (United) security at O'Hare on a regular basis. I have no confidence at all that those people have the first clue what they are doing.

    6. Re:stopgap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Also, to successfuly smuggle in weapons as a booth renter, they'd probably have to infiltrate an established company.

      ...salaam alekhim, we welcome you to Saudisoft, maker of fine flight simulators, allah permitting... takeoff? landing? well, our first version is just for flying practice ... eh? well, our customers have not needed it... hold on, that system bomb thing always comes up... ok, here, try it, have a blast!

    7. Re:stopgap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called evolution. As with so called "super bugs".

    8. Re:stopgap by KahunaBurger · · Score: 2

      ... he only got 7 knives through at the checkpoint. The crack security staff confiscated 2 from him. The other 7 and the stun gun and mace were discovered during a random (yeah, right) carry-on check.

      So what you're saying is that he didn't actually get any of it onto the plane. By 'yeah right'ing on the randomness of the second check, you also seem to be implying that it wasn't mere coincidence, either. So how exactly does this reflect badly on the overall security level?

      Kahuna Burger

      --
      ...will work for Chick tracts...
    9. Re:stopgap by Jburkholder · · Score: 2

      >how exactly does this reflect badly on the overall security level

      Well, first off if they only found 2 of 9 knives, I'd say they were at best sloppy. If you are security and you discover two knives in a person's carry-on, why would you just take those away and let them walk on into the terminal? Wouldn't you probably expect a more thorough search and interrogation of this individual after such a discovery?

      >you also seem to be implying that it wasn't mere coincidence

      Have you seen this guy's picture? The words 'racial profiling' come to mind. My 'yeah right' wasn't meant to imply that security somehow caught up with this guy. I've seen these 'random' carry-on checks. It is strange how random chance never seems to fall on caucasian males over the age of 27.

      My point is that the security staff I've encountered at O'Hare on an almost weekly basis often resemble welfare-to-work types who usually don't speak anything I'd call English and who appear to make little more than minimum wage.

      By contrast, Sea-Tac, my usual destination, seems to have a much more professional security staff in place.

    10. Re:stopgap by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      Roughly 16 years ago, I had finished my Advanced Indvidual Training in the U.S. Army and was returning to Indianapolis to work 3 months TDY as a recruiter's assistant. I was dressed in Class B uniform and had a pocket knife in my back pocket that I had honestly forgotten about. I was stopped by security at the metal detector, escorted to the security office and forced to 'throw away' my knife by dropping it into a waste basket before I was allowed to return to the terminal and to board the plane.

      In all the excitement, I left my carry-on bag at the x-ray machine where it was 'signed for' by someone and was never seen again. I lost my first and only genuine Sony Walkman and a bunch of good sci-fi novels.

      I find it very difficult to believe that in this day and age of 'increased airport security' this was allowed to happen... :-(

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    11. Re:stopgap by ichimunki · · Score: 2

      In fact, why bother trying to sneak anything bigger than a compact disposable lighter and a $20 bill onto the plane? The $20 buys a few of those little bottles of high-proof vodka and you can figure out the rest from there...

      --
      I do not have a signature
    12. Re:stopgap by Jburkholder · · Score: 1

      Replying to my own post, sorry - but I've seen additional info about this now.

      Eight security agents, including the supervisor, were suspended. I heard on the radio this morning that two were actually fired, although I can't find that online anywhere. Security is farmed out by United to Argenbright Security Inc.

      "Effective today, any individual who has a suspicious item confiscated by security personnel ... will automatically have their carry-on bags searched as well by Argenbright personnel," Bill Barbour, president of the company, said in a statement.

      Gurung was re-arrested yesterday (Monday) when he returned to claim his checked bag. His bag had gone on without him to Nebraska and back and the FBI charged him with a felony (two *additional* long-blade knives were found in his checked bag).

      The two knives previously taken by security were pocket knives he had in his parka as he wen through the metal detector. Apparently they didn't search his carry-on at all because the knives, stungun and can of pepper spray/teargas were not 'detected' by the x-ray.

      The felony charges against him carry a max 10 years and $250,000.

  16. Blow up? I think this is about anthrax or so.... by forsaken33 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I dont think the issue of bombing is what they're worrying about here. At least for me, i'd be worrying about diseases, not just anthrax which is supposed to be not that communicable, but other disesases such as smallpox.


    Heres the scenerio. Man brings bag of anthrax in pants pocket(or even better, crotch it) to show. He breaks in to the maintenence room, spreads it in to the outlet duct of the HVAC system. Now, anthrax is hard to spread, but you still might get a few people. It takes about 8,000 spores to infect a person, from what i read somewhere. Im sure you could get a few people with a small baggie full.



    This talks about visitors to the show. But, what about the maintenence staff that works there? The janitors? Heck, even the people running the show. We'd hope they all are honest and reputable. But then, if it was my life, I'd want them checked too. Heck, if i was trying something, i'd pose as a maintenence man! More freedom to go anywhere, carry large items, did the organizers think of that?



    I like the fact that they're at least trying to do something though.. Maybe they should be just a little less restrictive. I mean, its a computer show! And people can't bring their computers in?

    --
    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe =UTF-8&q=. amusing....
  17. Woohoo... by mmaddox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...as though I would go to a Comdex, anyway. The last one I attended was Spring 92, I think...Atlanta. It was large, and the porn and CDROM vendors had begun showing up in overwhelming numbers. The real COMPUTER people were always lonely, as all the geeks were crowded around the Penthouse Interactive booth, squirming and staring, or singing bad karaoke at one of the many booths that offered it.


    Comdex has lost its lustre, while increasing the lust. (Not that there's anything wrong with lust...) I don't see it appealing to many but the most neophyte computer consumers. All the real industry types stick to more focused conferences. Myself, I will only attend developer conferences in my specialties, or pay for training courses with small, narrow topic coverage. The big shows are nothing but comic book conventions.

    --

    What'dya mean there's no BLINK tag!?

    1. Re:Woohoo... by nettdata · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it's a great way to get out of work for a day with some techie buddies.

      Even if all you do is cut up all the people in the booths, it's still fun to get out and mingle and kill a day.

      --



      $0.02 (CDN)
    2. Re:Woohoo... by ovapositor · · Score: 1

      I agree, COMDEX is pretty weak. I used to frequent it when it was in Atlanta. The only benefit was the chance of getting some t-shirts and or checking out the rented hot girl spokes models. I remember my boss and myself walking around desperately trying to talk to anyone who had something intelligent to say about VOIP. It was a total joke.
      I think that these shows are going to get much less popular as the years progres. The security hassles will prolly speed their demise.

    3. Re:Woohoo... by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 2


      Trying to compare Comdex Atlanta 92 to the "real" comdex in Vegas that year is best explained by a comparison to actually attending a party -- or cleaning up after a party the next morning... (With the ATL being the next morning). I went to both that year and I can say that it was the biggest waste of time in my whole tenure of being a Comdex junky....(although many more ATL and Chicago shows can claim a close second....)

      --
      (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  18. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  19. Ridiculous Paranoia by LeninZhiv · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This reminds me of something I saw on the CBC a couple weeks ago, when the anthrax panic was at its height; the city hall of Moncton was evacuated because of an anthrax scare. (For those of you who don't know--almost everybody which is exactly why this was so ridiculous--Moncton is the third biggest town in the Canadian province of New Brunswick).

    I mean *HONESTLY*, who on earth would target COMDEX, something that has absolutely no importance to the general (non-technical) public? From a terrorist's point of view (which is what you try to take if your aim is an intelligent security policy) it's obviously of no use to attack a target that people would have to explain why it was that striking it meant something. The WTC and Pentagon were big and well-known. And even if everyone on Slashdot knows who Larry Ellison is, I think it's safe to say that for the general worldwide public he is not a household name.

    Let's try concentrating our security efforts on realistic threats and not ridiculous paranoia--otherwise groups or conventions might start deliberately giving the impression that they're a potential threat to terrorists just to seem important (God forbid!).

    1. Re:Ridiculous Paranoia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually, if you're a terrorist who wants to inflict maximum mental trauma on a population, (and lets face it, thats their only real weapon)
      your best bet would be to be as illogical as possible in your bombings, so that people don't have the ability to say that "They will never hurt me, I live in rural Wisconsin" or something like that. Right now I DO feel safe BECAUSE I live in rural Wisconsin, but if there was a bombing in Fond du Lac (a city 20 miles from where I live with a population of about 25000) I would be singing a differrent tune.

    2. Re:Ridiculous Paranoia by alexburke · · Score: 2

      For those of you who don't know--almost everybody which is exactly why this was so ridiculous--Moncton is the third biggest town in the Canadian province of New Brunswick

      ... which is the third-smallest province in Canada. ;)

    3. Re:Ridiculous Paranoia by Captain+Bonzo · · Score: 1
      . And even if everyone on Slashdot knows who Larry Ellison is, I think it's safe to say that for the general worldwide public he is not a household name.

      <thinks>But it's probably safe to say that Bill Gates is a household name. Hmm... But would he be in attendance?...</thinks>

    4. Re:Ridiculous Paranoia by jht · · Score: 2

      You're spot-on that Comdex is a highly unlikely target for a terror attack, but consider this:

      An awful lot of the geeks who have important IT jobs at their companies go to Comdex (and Interop). Since so few companies do any kind of serious disaster or succession planning, if you took out the attendees at one of these conferences, you'd probably have a fairly large economic impact as the companies that employed the victims floundered afterwards.

      The other point to attacking Comdex (particularly in a bio attack) would be that it's one of the largest conferences anywhere, with people attending from all over. Release a bio agent that is contagious and has an incubation time of a few days, and you can infect large portions of the country with relatively little effort.

      A lot of companies depend on tech, even when they aren't in the tech business directly. And Comdex would be a target of opportunity. Is it likely? No. What we saw on September 11th was attacks on locations chosen mainly for their symbolic value. Further attacks of that nature would be likeliest. But it could happen. I do, however, think that the precautions that Comdex is taking are over the top.

      I don't go to Comdex, but I do go to Interop (Atlanta - in fact I was there on September 11th and wound up driving home to Boston with a friend of mine who was there as well), and I bring my laptop to the classes, and a backpack onto the show floor (it's a lot more comfy and easier to stuff than the stupid vendor plastic bags). If these rules are in place next fall for Interop, it might well make going more trouble than it's worth.

      --
      -- Josh Turiel
      "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
    5. Re:Ridiculous Paranoia by nettdata · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... in some wierd, sick, twisted way, targetting Comdex may do us all a favour.

      --



      $0.02 (CDN)
    6. Re:Ridiculous Paranoia by zangdesign · · Score: 1

      So it doesn't matter to you that they may be trying to keep you safe? Yeah, it might be overreacting, but it might not be.

      Besides, they put on the show - they make the rules. If you don't like it, don't go.

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
  20. And then he said by tinrobot · · Score: 1

    No bags, huh? Then I guess I'll have to leave the wife at home. (rimshot) Thank you, ladies and germs, I'll be here all week....

    1. Re:And then he said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, my jokes are corny that they could feed a chicken for years

    2. Re:And then he said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      choke your chicken on your own time

  21. What about Student ID? by AnimeFreak · · Score: 1

    My Information Technology 12 class may take a few students, most likely me, to COMDEX in Vancouver BC, Canada which isn't too far away. I wonder if they'll accept Student ID? As it contains a picture and name.

  22. Isn't this an old policy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last two times I was at Comdex there was a "no handbag no backpack" rule. Doesn't seem like a new policy to me.

  23. strip searches by GnulixRulz · · Score: 1
    You ask whether there'll be strip searches? Well, check out this statement:-

    Key3Media reserves the right to take any security measures it deems appropriate to increase the safety of our exhibitors and attendees, without prior notice. Key3Media reserves the right to change the policies set forth herein, without prior notice, in its sole discretion.

    So it looks like strip searches could be suddenly implemented. I wonder if anybody would mind (actively) if they did. Americans are such sheep.

    PS: Could somebody enlighten me if companies do have such 'rights' that they are reserving? Isn't that like changing the terms of the contract after it has been agreed to by the exchange of a consideration?

    1. Re:strip searches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope

      but you are right about the sheep.

  24. Just like what baseball game ?? by Archfeld · · Score: 3, Funny

    Give an inch they will take a mile... Screw 'Em
    For the BEST ?, maybe for the stadiums' income. Went to a football game yesterday, took a cooler and a backpack full of stuff, they looked, and said have a nice day. The same at the shark tank, If they told me I could not bring my backpack in they would lose a season ticket holder. A search I can stand, using it as a means to ensure you buy their SHITTY, overpriced food is another thing entirely. Am I the only one that thinks the enemy can win without ever lifting another finger ?

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    1. Re:Just like what baseball game ?? by jackb_guppy · · Score: 1

      I will not stand for search - they have lost my business. PERIOD.

      All the stupid search protects nothing. If you want to hurt all in the building, you can carry that in shirt pocket. Short of doing full cavity searchs to protect from the quiet attach, all areas are not safe from a person who realy wants to hurt people.

      But then again - ALS is in Oakland and it is time for another BIG Quake. So lost from the start.

      ALS belongs in Atlanta -- opps the bombing there 6 years ago.

      Are we feeling the safety?

      Best thing to do is NOT FLY do not go to the show, when they realize no one is playing thier games they will give us our rights back.

    2. Re:Just like what baseball game ?? by csbruce · · Score: 3, Offtopic

      A search I can stand, using it as a means to ensure you buy their SHITTY, overpriced food is another thing entirely. Am I the only one that thinks the enemy can win without ever lifting another finger ?

      The only force in the world strong enough to defeat America... is America.

    3. Re:Just like what baseball game ?? by thogard · · Score: 1

      No, your rights are gone forever. Rights are never restored.

    4. Re:Just like what baseball game ?? by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 3, Troll

      I own and operate a movie theatre. In common with all other theatres, I make my profit from the concession sales. The price that you pay for the ticket to get in to the show doesn't actually leave anything for "profit".

      Can you imagine what would happen if a lot of people started to bring their own popcorn and drinks to the show and quit purchasing it from the concession? The sound of a door being locked....

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    5. Re:Just like what baseball game ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Can you imagine what would happen if a lot of people started to bring their own popcorn and drinks to the show and quit purchasing it from the concession

      OOOH OOH. Let me guess:

      1) You would start instituting strip search policies which would further alienate you from your customers.

      Ooh wait wait.., I've got another idea

      2) You might lower the price on your concessions

      Oooh wait wait....

      3) Nothing. You're a dumb little snot nose kid who collects the tickets and says "third theater on the right, have a nice day"

    6. Re:Just like what baseball game ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you imagine what would happen if a lot of people started to bring their own popcorn and drinks to the show and quit purchasing it from the concession?

      How about - people would leave the the theater with more money in their pocket and more satisfied with their snack?

    7. Re:Just like what baseball game ?? by Genom · · Score: 1

      I own and operate a movie theatre. In common with all other theatres, I make my profit from the concession sales. The price that you pay for the ticket to get in to the show doesn't actually leave anything for "profit".

      Really? I thought profit was the reason every time I go to a movie, it seems the price has jumped at least 25-50 cents...is the MPAA gouging the theatres that badly?

      I remember while I was growing up, and in high school, even, a nighttime showing was 5 bucks. Now I'm lucky if it's under 9.75. Admittedly I've been out of HS for 8 years now...but still, the price hikes seem outrageous. It's the reason I don't see many movies anymore.

      The other issue is the absolutely outrageous cost of popcorn/soft drinks at the movie concessions. Now, admittedly, a "medium" theatre drink is generally about the size of a "large" anywhere else, but still, charging 3 times as much for an equivalent drink is highway robbery, any way you look at it, even with a captive audience. On the popcorn end of it - take a look at how much normal popcorn costs. Now look at general theatre prices. They're at least 5-8 times what the stuff costs.

      I don't mind paying a premium for the ticket, or for the food, but I do mind when I feel like I'm getting ripped off with the ticket, and KNOW I'm getting ripped off with the food.

      (Not to mention that I'm diabetic, and generally the only 2 beverages I could get *at* the theatre would be Diet Coke/Pepsi (ICK!) or water (bland)... I generally manage to "smuggle" in a diet lemon Snapple or Arizona iced tea -- which I figure should be perfectly legal seeing as I can't GET it at the theatre (they lose no money if I hate their beverage offerings and wouldn't have bought one anyway) -- now if they offered Diet Barqs(the only halfway decent tasting diet soft drink, IMHO), or a decent selection if diet teas, I might feel guilty about bringing my own drink)

    8. Re:Just like what baseball game ?? by shepd · · Score: 1

      >I own and operate a movie theatre.

      I go to movie theaters.

      >Can you imagine what would happen if a lot of people started to bring their own popcorn and drinks to the show and quit purchasing it from the concession? The sound of a door being locked....

      I already do this. Look for the guy with the crinkly stomach.

      On that note, I've been to a lot of theaters where I hear "psssh..." (the sound of a can opening) over and over again before the show starts.

      If you don't make any money on the ticket, I'm sorry to hear that. The tickets are usually well overpriced (IMHO as your customer) at $10 a pop to begin with, even if you aren't making any money. That's the reason why I won't chuck in another $5 - $10 for food. For $20 I can get a _lot_ more value than watching a movie at a theater. [In Canada, the movies come out for FREE on DirecTV a few months later anyways].

      Of course, I quit going to the theater more than once a year when ticket prices went over $5 so maybe you don't have to worry about me. Or, if you're a prudent businessman, you will.

      If you can get the ticket + food price to under $8 I'll see you monthly. $7 and I might be there weekly.

      Your choice. As a consumer I'm just exercising my right to boycott your high prices (oh, and if you catch me coming in with outside food and kick me out, no big loss. You'll be refunding my ticket anyhow, and then I'll never come back no matter what your price is. Ever).

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    9. Re:Just like what baseball game ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Admittedly I've been out of HS for 8 years now...but still, the price hikes seem outrageous.

      And with the current downturn in the economy, and the inflation rate of the past 8 years, I would suggest ticket prices should be no more than $7.50.

      >charging 3 times as much for an equivalent drink is highway robbery, any way you look at it, even with a captive audience.

      (*) In fact, ripping off a captive audience is the worst thing a business can do. Leaves a very bad taste in the consumers mouth when they feel like they have been "forced" to pay an outrageous price.

      >On the popcorn end of it - take a look at how much normal popcorn costs. Now look at general theatre prices. They're at least 5-8 times what the stuff costs.

      Lessee:

      $0.05 - Popcorn kernels
      $0.03 - Electricity for popcorn popper
      $0.12 - Butter
      -----
      $0.20 - Total

      $3.00 - Movie theater popcorn price where I live
      -----
      15 x The price

      Unless the popcorn makers are getting $80/hour movie theaters run a virtual popcorn cartel.

      >but I do mind when I feel like I'm getting ripped off with the ticket, and KNOW I'm getting ripped off with the food.

      My (*) point exactly.

      Welcome to the real world, Mr. Movie Theater Operator. [sung to that idiotic Barney song] You screw me, I screw you, were an failing business.

    10. Re:Just like what baseball game ?? by mttlg · · Score: 1
      I own and operate a movie theatre. In common with all other theatres, I make my profit from the concession sales. The price that you pay for the ticket to get in to the show doesn't actually leave anything for "profit".

      Then your business model is flawed. Even if this is the same business model used by the rest of the industry, it is still flawed. Everything comes down to value. To me, there is no value in purchasing food at a movie theater, so I don't buy any. The movies themselves often lack any value at any price, so I don't go to see them. On the rare chance that something is worth the matinee price, the half hour or so of commercials before the movie takes the value down a notch. In the end, a $10-15 DVD purchased a year or two after the movie is released will usually be a better value than seeing the movie in a theater, unless you have a particular interest in the movie and absolutely need to see it right away. Whether the reason for high ticket prices and low profit margin is the cost of obtaining the film, the cost of the projectionist, the cost of the facility, the cost of making the movie, the cost of actors, or the cost of the ad campaigns that try to make a piece of garbage look appealing by plastering the movie's name over everything, there is still a lack of value that will keep me from going out to see a movie. As value further decreases, fewer people will go to movies, until only teenagers with handfuls of cash and empty brains are left staring at the screen.

    11. Re:Just like what baseball game ?? by horza · · Score: 1

      To me, there is no value in purchasing food at a movie theater, so I don't buy any.

      I and pretty much everyone else I know tend to stick a can and a pack of crisps or sweets in their pockets before they go into the cinema... except when we fall into the 'date' category. Then we tend to make a big show of buying Coke or popcorn in the cinema knowing full well our date knows how overpriced it is. English cinemas have twigged this and never search too thoroughly (unless seen carrying in a BBQ and you smell of raw meat). In fact, during real laddish films I've walked quite openly into a film carrying a 4-pack in a carrier bag.

      Phillip.

    12. Re:Just like what baseball game ?? by operagost · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Here's how you get them back.

      "What country before ever existed a century & a half without a rebellion? & what country can preserve it's liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon & pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants."

      -Thomas Jefferson, 1787

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    13. Re:Just like what baseball game ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try Diet Dr. Pepper. Somehow they managed to hide the weird, malty Aspartame taste better than most others. Diet Minute Maid is pretty good too.

    14. Re:Just like what baseball game ?? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1


      Maybe more people would buy food and drinks at the concession stands if y'all would start charging reasonable prices. $3 for a tub of popcorn that cost you 20 cents to buy, prepare, and sell is, quite frankly, offensive.

      Given the choice between buying a box of Junior Mints for $2 or buying the exact same box at Target for 95 cents before the show and smuggling it in, you can guess which one will happen.

    15. Re:Just like what baseball game ?? by Cinnamon · · Score: 1

      Here's a suggestion a little different from all the other screaming on here. I, too, sneak popcorn into the theatre, although I'll always buy my soda to try and support the theatre.(That's not my suggestion.)

      I go to movies a LOT, maybe twice a week if I can make it. Indie films, mainstream films, doesn't matter to me as long as it's cinema. I go to probably five different theatre-owned chains here in California (AMC, Cinemark, Syufy, Camera, Independent) and you know what? THE POPCORN TASTES LIKE SHIT. This is not a comment on how good the popcorn is compared with, say, microwave popcorn. It is quite definately a food product I wouldn't feed my dog. It is regularly served stale, or glopped with that horrific goo you call butter flavoring that's worse than the worst margarine, filled with seeds, served cold, whatever. For the price of a large popcorn I can go to a fast-food restaurant and get more food, of better quality, served hot, with a soda, and enjoy it more than the swill you owners call food.

      You want to improve concession sales, research ways you can improve the flavor of popcorn while moderately increasing your price. Oh, but wait, that would cut into your precious profits. Sorry to tell you this, but it's how the market works. If you can't offer a superior product, or a superior price, bye! Maybe if enough theatre chains die the studios will loosen the screws a little on their prices.

      --
      -- If we were in any other industry they would've shot us a long time ago.
    16. Re:Just like what baseball game ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please. Can we grow up a bit and be reasonable. First, whatever you can carry in a shirt pocket to destroy a building is probably alot harder to get than something you can carry in a bag and destroying the building isn't always the main goal. You can also get a handgun almost anywhere. The idea behind terrorists is to strike "terror" (see the connection) into people causing their society to fail. After all, society is based on a mutual belief system so if the belief in the system fails, the system itself fails. If 5 people in 5 public places all killed only a few people on the same day, our society would start to become afraid to go into public. Especially with the rabid "must report everything for a profit" media. And of course, on top of that, if someone DID go in and blow up the building people like you would be the first to critisize them for not having enough security. It's easy to stand on the sidelines and critisize things. It's another matter all together to have to be the one to actually make the decisions and live with them. Don't like it and we'd loose your business? Oh, what a loss.

    17. Re:Just like what baseball game ?? by ChaosDiscordSimple · · Score: 1

      Can you imagine what would happen if a lot of people started to bring their own popcorn and drinks to the show and quit purchasing it from the concession? The sound of a door being locked....

      Save the sob story, I ain't buying it.

      I simply don't purchase food or drink at the movie. Yet somehow the theatres continue to operate. As a teenager I and my friends snuck plenty of food into movies. Yet somehow the theatres continued to operate.

      But perhaps ticket only customers are only break-even, or even a slight loss, but the customers buying $5 buckets of 25 cent popcorn with "golden flavoring" pull in the real profit. What would happen if you lost them? If for some reason it wasn't possible to stop carry in food. You'd go out of business? You aren't much of a businessman. You might try something crazy first and just raise ticket prices.

      Your competitors will have to face the same theoretical inability to restrict carry in food. They will either raise prices (keeping your prices competitive) or close their door (increasing your market share).

      Perhaps movie tickets are very elastic. I doubt it, but if it really is costs will need to be cut. We don't really need stadium seating and THX sound in every theatre. We don't really need 100 million dollar special effect heavy films. The industry will adjust. Perhaps in the short term some theatres will go out of business. That's business. Just because you're making money today doesn't guarantee you that it will make money tomorrow. Ultimately Americans like movies and we'll work out a way to pay for and see them. If that doesn't involve your particular theatre, so be it.

    18. Re:Just like what baseball game ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the reasons I stopped going to the movie theatre is the high cost, $9 in my area. But the item that really got me pissed off is:

      I got used to the slide show advertisements, but when the showtime came, what was shown was 5 " feature legnth commercials " I did not just pay $18 to see comercials.

      Also some of the new trailers totally ruin the upcomming movie, "I've seen the trailer, now I don't have to see the movie". These things are no longer "teasers", they give away the whole movie.

      As for food prices, I make a habit of eating before going to a movie. ( not that I go any more ).

      Also, I can buy the movie online for the cost of going. Granted I don't have such a big screen at home, but the sound is just as good, the floor is not sticky, and no one is talking.

    19. Re:Just like what baseball game ?? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Screw the "stadium seats". I just want a decent screen... and yes the THX sound does matter. You would be surprised what a proper sound system can do for even a meagre screen.

      Nevermind the crap food that no-one with a solid grasp of Mathematics would touch, I'd just like the movie experience itself be worth the current ticket prices. HELL, I'd be willing to pay MORE for ticket prices if it meant seeing films in the kind of Torus houses that Lennox 24 in Columbus has.

      You want people to WANT to pay you more money Mr. BusinessMan. IMPROVE THE CORE PRODUCT.

      Stop giving us 10x overpriced junk food, screens that will soon be eclipsed by home theatre technology, and sound systems that are already eclipsed by home theatre technology.

      If the US had a decent video standard that projected onto a 120"+ screen well, there would be no point in the movie theatre business.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    20. Re:Just like what baseball game ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but yours is obviously a different business model. To even things up, I suggest you triple your prices, and also start pushing hard to get people to buy your new Movie Plus, Special Movie, and Executive Movie passes for prices ranging between $495 and $2895. These would include access to the lobby as well as the right to sit in on several or all of the movies you're currently showing. Special and Executive pass holders would also get to pow-wow with some of the minor cast and crew from a few of the films.

      Given these changes to your business model, do you think it would kill you to charge reasonble prices for high quality popcorn?

    21. Re:Just like what baseball game ?? by Tassach · · Score: 1
      is the MPAA gouging the theatres that badly?

      Yes. A theatre is lucky just to make operating expenses on the box office receipts. It's been a while since I worked in the theatre biz, but when I did, we only got to keep maybe 10-15% of the box office gross -- the rest went straight back to the distributer. For most movies, the theatre has to pay a flat cost ($10K+) to the distributer for the print, then they usually have to pay a per-seat royalty as well. Of course, studio-owned theatres get a big break on films from the parent studio.



      If you got rid of the consession stand, theatre owners would probably have to double ticket prices just to stay in business. There's a reason there aren't many independent theatres left anymore.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    22. Re:Just like what baseball game ?? by festers · · Score: 1

      Charging $3.50 for a bag of candy that cost you $0.36 is completely outrageous. I'm not against making a profit (heck, I work for a computer reseller), but what you do is nothing more than a price gouging scam. I will continue to bring my own snacks (in the few movies I see at the theater) for as long as you try to rip people off.

      --


      -------
      "Every artist is a cannibal, every poet is a thief."
    23. Re:Just like what baseball game ?? by uberdood · · Score: 1

      The movie theatre I worked at in college *did* allow people to bring in their own food and drinks and we managed to make a great profit. For some reason people like hot fresh popcorn at a movie.

      People are going to sneak stuff in to a movie (especially up north during winter). But a stong segment will still buy at the counter for convenience.

      $5 for 30 cents of popcorn? $4 for 25 cents of soda? Give me a break. If concession prices were reasonable, more people would buy and profits would increase. Take a chance and try it one Saturday - half-price concession.

      --
      "Population 1,656"
    24. Re:Just like what baseball game ?? by uberdood · · Score: 1

      In Canada, the movies come out for FREE on DirecTV a few months later anyways

      Interesting given DirecTV doesn't provide service in Canada. Sure, you can steal it, but it isn't legally provided by DirecTV.

      DirecTV's Canada/Mexico policy

      --
      "Population 1,656"
    25. Re:Just like what baseball game ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea i made the mistake of trying to go to a movie last month. for the first time in like 5 years.

      the commercials went on & on & on & on & on

      30 min later i got up & left, the movie still hadnt started

    26. Re:Just like what baseball game ?? by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      Good heavens. Everyone here seems to think that my theatre is some kind of a rip-off without even knowing what the prices are.

      Here you go, guys. Note: I am in Canada. All prices in Canadian dollars.

      Admission:

      Adult - $5
      Child 12 and under - $4
      Senior Citizen - $4
      Family (parents with their own children) - $16

      Concession:
      Soda Pop
      Small - $1, medium $1.50, large $2
      Popcorn
      Small $2, large $4
      Candy bars $1

      Incidentally, I put REAL BUTTER on my popcorn here - none of that fake "flavoured topping" stuff. Price of popcorn quoted above includes butter.

      I truly don't think that I'm ripping people off.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    27. Re:Just like what baseball game ?? by aka-ed · · Score: 1

      We're way OT here, but saying "your business model is flawed" doesn't change things. This is not anybody's "business model" -- this is the way the business has been shaped by the monopoly power of the Hollywod studios.


      The "alternate model" is for Hollywood to own all the movie theaters, thus cornering distribution as well as production. That is why Hollywood is giving this guy, and every other independent theater owner, a rough time.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    28. Re:Just like what baseball game ?? by zenyu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I own and operate a movie theatre.

      I'm sure you've discovered you're public enemy no. 1 now.

      I don't know how much you charge for your movies, but in NYC it tends to be around $10. And they all charge about the same price so my selection criteria is basically, "Which of these places treats me most like a criminal?" The ones that let me walk in with my coffee I go to once or twice a month, the one that lets me smoke once a week. The one that doesn't let me carry a drink in, I only go to when they are the only ones showing the movie (rare).

      No theater has ever tried to search my bag in NYC, but it's happened elsewhere and I was pretty miffed that I even when I could sell my ticket. I can't imagine why I'd go back.

      Now I understand that most theaters make their money off the 17-- set, but I think if more of them aimed at the 20++ set they could make more money because I don't mind the $4 coke, if I'm thirsty it's worth it.

    29. Re:Just like what baseball game ?? by aka-ed · · Score: 1

      Reasonable in theory, but the problem is the Holywood cartel that seeks to own and control both production and distribution. Anything an independent does to increase ticket revenues can be countered by new demands from Hollywood. As to one of your specific suggestions -- how is an independent theater owner supposed to arrange for folks to hobnob with the cast of a Sony film, when Sony's theater chain is the competition?

      What's needed is not an improved business model, it's the elimination of the Holywood cartel from distribution. Long-standing antitrust legislation that took Hollywood out of the distribution biz was repealed during the Reagan era.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    30. Re:Just like what baseball game ?? by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      I don't know how much you charge for your movies,

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=23421&cid=25 30 146

      in NYC it tends to be around $10

      It's not $10 or anywhere near. I'm absolutely amazed that everyone assumes that I'm ripping folks off without even asking for the facts.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    31. Re:Just like what baseball game ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      DANG! that's CHEAP!


      Here in Cali it's $8.50-$10 for an adult,
      $2 less for seniors/kids/students.

    32. Re:Just like what baseball game ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A judge in Quebec recently deemed all DirecTV signals public domian.

      Since you cannot steal anything Public Domain, you are therefore incorrect.

  25. From no security to overboard -bag checks are easy by Mandelbrute · · Score: 4, Interesting
    In Australia we were going to have something like this at the olympics with an extra little twist. It was going to be illegal to bring in drinking water, but perfectly legal to line up for three hours (which happened) for bottled water at 300% mark up in 35 celcius heat. The reason given was for security reasons - but it was overthrown because it was just someone using security as an excuse to make a buck.

    If someone wants to bring anthrax to comdex, why will they need to bring it in a bag? If someone wants to bring in an automatic weapon it should be pretty easy to pick up in a bag search. Explosives don't need a lot of space.

    Whatever you do, don't be Irish .. (no wait that should read from anywhere from Morroco to the Phillipines, or even be Greek) and be in the wrong place at the wrong time until sanity prevails.

  26. I take the open source chant and modify it thusly: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I take the following open source chant and modify it to fit this situation:

    "Security through obscurity."

    This current situation attempts:

    Security through absurdity.

  27. Using WTC as an excuse by Valdrax · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've noticed a trend lately. More and more places are banning things that they've wanted to ban in the past, but were worried about the backlash from under the guise of "increasing security." Banning non-vendor bags and laptops in no way increases security, but the first does increase the visibility of vendor advertising. The second improves traffic flow by minimizing those cumbersome laptop bags and by keeping people from whipping them out at a vendor table

    Similarly, my college's stadium is now banning bags along with a whole slew of other items that could be used for sneaking food and drinks in, which has been their primary irritation in the past. Now, under the guise of improved security, they can ban items that would've angered fans too much in the past.

    Basically, the COMDEX people are taking advantage of the current political environment to sweep some minor annoyances under the rug. It's a disturbing trend right now.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Using WTC as an excuse by Kris_J · · Score: 4, Interesting
      "...in no way increases security, but the first does increase the visibility of vendor advertising."
      Quick Trick: Take the biggest show bag you're handed and turn it inside-out. Presto, no logo.
    2. Re:Using WTC as an excuse by Darth+Turbogeek · · Score: 2, Informative

      Insightful stuff on security practices snipped

      Well said and unfortunantly true. Even in Sydney, where there is little credible threat (I hope), things are being pulled a bit tighter but to be honest, not much. Still you do hear things about "Well because of this event, we have to do this" all in the name of public safety.

      To me, this has two sides and two argument extremes...

      1) It's a grab at closing shut civil liberties. Maybe

      2) It's displays a duty of care which the organisers are bound to provide. If they cant guarenttee security with the restrictions they have in place right now, then what needs to be done so this guarenttee can take place?

      I personally think it's more of 2) than of 1) myself. I doubt something would happen, but IF it did and the organisers did not take all resonable precautions, then say hello to the lawyers.

      It's also noted the definition of resonable risk and resonable preventative action has been risen considerably.

      So what's next, we have to attend in the nude?

      --
      "Old Rallydrivers never die - they just fail to book in on time"
    3. Re:Using WTC as an excuse by lewp · · Score: 1

      I agree with the parent. As easy as it is to portray the people making these decisions as being greed incarnate using the terrorist activities as of late to make a little more money, I think it's more prudent to look at it from the same angle I'm sure they've had to: It's true, you can't guarantee absolute security, but do you really want to be the person that has to answer for why something bad happened with something along the lines of "well, we figured it'd be too inconvenient to ask the attendees to do X"? Living with one's self would be fairly difficult, even without taking into account the opinions and anger of others.

      --
      Game... blouses.
    4. Re:Using WTC as an excuse by WNight · · Score: 2

      To be safe from scummy lawyers, all you have to do is take reasonable precautions. Unless you are an expert this usually means consulting experts.

      Hire a security company, follow their advice. If they don't recommend you stop allowing bags, you can essentially do so without worry. If it comes to a lawsuit, you point to the experts who gave you the advice and explain why you had reason to believe them to be experts.

      Banning everying can probably cause more problems then carefully analyzing the situation and taking apropriate actions.

      If there's a reason behing the ban then it should be stated, not the simple fact of the ban. If the ban is intended to stop someone from smuggling in a weapon then you instruct the security it stop anything that could be used for that purpose, not just "bags". (How about purses and fanny packs? Boxes of "papers"?)

      Furthermore, no good can be served by preventing outside bags because a would-be-terrorist would simply leave, put a weapon in the bag, and come back.

      You could prevent anyone from bringing in anything bag-like, but then again, you've got to know the real purpose or you get stuck on the issue of "is it a bag?"

    5. Re:Using WTC as an excuse by lewp · · Score: 3, Funny

      If I were just worried about being safe from lawyers I'd be a lawyer. I, fortunately, have a conscience :).

      --
      Game... blouses.
    6. Re:Using WTC as an excuse by blang · · Score: 2

      So what's next, we have to attend in the nude?

      Unfortunately not. That would fall under the "we must protect the children" excuse.

      --
      -- Another senseless waste of fine bytes.
    7. Re:Using WTC as an excuse by jmauro · · Score: 2

      It's more greed incarnate for not taking these steps years ago when there was still a risk, but not everyone was worried. Then I'd not fault them for it. I fault them for being greedy for taking these steps now when it is more in vogue. Most of the "newer protections" are to make people feel safe, but do not actaully add to safety in any measurable way. I mean, if it was that easy to ban bags from a show room or make everyone go to the ticket counter, these things should of been done years ago. Can safety be gaurenteed by these simple, easy to do measures? Do any of these measures really stop a determined person (i.e. like an organized terrorist cell) from doing harm? There is now a demand for being more "safe" and people are paying for it. Those who are implementing these measures are being greedy, in that they want to attract more customers to their venue, with out really increasing the cost of holding the event. Things like banning bags and laptops work for this goal well. And if it increases food sales and makes those who are selling goods on the floor happy, then its just an added bonus.

    8. Re:Using WTC as an excuse by gregorio · · Score: 0

      Quick Trick: Take the biggest show bag you're handed and turn it inside-out. Presto, no logo.
      You are so 1337, huh? "Let's hurt these bad companies, advertising is evil!".

    9. Re:Using WTC as an excuse by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • Banning non-vendor bags and laptops in no way increases security

      Not really true. Cynical as I am, I think that this is a genuine (if token) attempt at security, not a restriction on unwelcome items. The policy is a blanket ban on anything that can be used to contain or conceal Something Nasty. It will stop stupid, lazy, people who don't want to die from walking in the front door carrying a bomb in their hand.

      It's just a shame that people like the September 11th hijackers, are neither stupid, nor lazy, nor do they care about their own lives. They'll use the back door, or just strap 20kg of plastique on themselves, throw a jacket over it, and walk through the front door with their perfectly valid passport. :-(

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    10. Re:Using WTC as an excuse by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2
      "Quick Trick: Take the biggest show bag you're handed and turn it inside-out. Presto, no logo."
      Quick Trick: Print your plastic bag company logo on the inside of all those .com bags you're printing.
      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    11. Re:Using WTC as an excuse by crawling_chaos · · Score: 1
      Furthermore, no good can be served by preventing outside bags because a would-be-terrorist would simply leave, put a weapon in the bag, and come back.

      I don't think it's that simple. It was not clear to me whether or not they would allow any bag back in the hall, whether vendor logoed or not. A one way flow of bags puts a damper on this strategy.

      The policy is still stupid, though.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    12. Re:Using WTC as an excuse by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "The policy is a blanket ban on anything that can be used to contain or conceal Something Nasty."

      It is? I'm glad we live in a world where terrorists can't afford to get the 3COM logo printed on the side of a bag that can contain or conceal Something Nasty. I'm glad we live in a world where terrorists also can't just get a bag in the show, carry it back to their hotel room, place Something Nasty inside it, and then carry it back to the show.

      The policy is not a blanket ban on anything that can be used to contain or conceal Something Nasty. Instead, it's a case of making sure your front door is locked, while at the same time leaving your windows wide, wide open.

    13. Re:Using WTC as an excuse by greenrd · · Score: 1
      Mod parent up!!

    14. Re:Using WTC as an excuse by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      Hey, it was the post above me that was all "great, more advertising".

    15. Re:Using WTC as an excuse by WolfTheWerewolf · · Score: 1

      Fuck 'em. Bring a roll of opaque tape of your favorite type and cover up the silly-ass logos on the bags the corporate megalodons dole out to all of the good little consumers. At the very least don't give them free advertising.

  28. What's with turning the laptop on, anyway? by btempleton · · Score: 4, Informative

    They seem to think that forcing people to turn a laptop on is an important security measure. You used to be able to not even have it x-rayed if you could get it to display a boot.

    With multi-swappable bay laptops, or even older ones, why did they think this was a way to protect against a weapon being in the laptop?

    --
    Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
    1. Re:What's with turning the laptop on, anyway? by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 2

      I would like to point out that my Dell Inspiron 5000e has two battery bays, one of which doubles as a DVD-ROM drive if I swap the battery for the drive. But it came with something else.

      It came with a plastic cover that is hollow, the size of a drive/battery, and fits into either of the bays to "keep the weight down."

      It would not be difficult at all to outfit that compartment with plastic explosives. I just happen to ALSO be carrying a battery? See where I'm going with this?

      Do I think Laptops should be disallowed? Absolutely not. But then, I also believe I should have the right to carry a fully loaded handgun into the show so I can put a hole into someone's head if they pose an immediate threat to me or other innocent people.

      Too bad guns are disallowed in WAY TOO MANY places now days.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    2. Re:What's with turning the laptop on, anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even more frightening is when the DON'T ask you to turn on the laptop. I do not trust the "security" officials to know what a laptop x-ray really looks like. How many of these people have degrees in EE? Someone could just as easily build circuit boards out of plastique or load a hard disk with C-4. I'd like to see the checkpoints both x-ray AND turn on the damned laptops. Don't just look through them, but see them work, too. I was actually shocked that THEY JUST LET ME WALK THROUGH A CHECKPOINT TWO DAYS AGO WITHOUT VERIFYING THAT MY LAPTOP WAS TRULY THAT.

    3. Re:What's with turning the laptop on, anyway? by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Insightful
      • Too bad guns are disallowed in WAY TOO MANY places now days

      Untrue. Weapons are not banned; you have 2nd Amendment protection on that, and if we don't need an armed militia now, then when will we need one?

      What is happening is that people carrying weapons (not just firearms) are banned. The statement couldn't be clearer: if you have a weapon, and aren't wearing a uniform, we will assume that you have criminal intent.

      Don't ever let anyone tell you that they're banning your weapon, or that your weapon poses a security risk. They're making a "guilty until proven innocent" judgement about you, they're just too weaselly to admit it.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    4. Re:What's with turning the laptop on, anyway? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2

      This is why I use Active Desktop to make my computer boot up and look like a bomb timer.

      You can hold enough plastique in your shirt pocket to blow out a window and crash a plane. All this shiznit is a waste of our time.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    5. Re:What's with turning the laptop on, anyway? by garver · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It doesn't prove everything, but it does prove something:

      • That the whole laptop isn't a container for bad things. By making you turn it on, they have reduced the laptop's useful cargo from around 1"x10"x12" to around 0.75"x4"x4". Not bad for 10 seconds worth of searching.
      • More importantly, they got to watch you. Did you have a brief look of panic? Did you roll your eyes? Did you roll your eyes overly dramatically?

      No check is perfect. Their job is to achieve the maximum effectiveness in a minimal amount of time. As a result, most of their checks are designed to elicit a response from you. Also, their job is to find people with weapons that intend to use them, not just find weapons. People on a mission will act differently (nervous, attentive, scared, determined) than people just catching a flight (bored, inattentive, impatient).

  29. Not required to carry ID anywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only by law you have to provide the 'law enforcement' officer with your name. If he has a problem he can take you down town but somthing better be wrong or you will be sitting pretty in a new car payed for by you local PD :)

    1. Re:Not required to carry ID anywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have a point?

    2. Re:Not required to carry ID anywhere by the_brat_king · · Score: 1

      Normally I'd post this anonymously, but I am sick of the bullshit, whining and tantrums that the cry-baby leftist fuck-offs keep posting... Karma? fuck it... I just want my post READ.

      In what state was that? In every state I have lived in, you are required to have (at the age of 18), either a VALID and CURRENT driver's license, or a CURRENT state ID. It's been that way for years... As for "sitting pretty in a new car"... did you know that ANY crime you commit (even speeding, not yielding to pedestrians, as a pedestrian: impeding the flow of traffic/jay-walking/crossing against a red) is an arrestable offense? The reason police generally only arrest people who don't cooperate, or who have commited a felonious offense is because to do otherwise would flood the jails. The ONLY false arrest claims that can be successfully made are if you have 1) a solid credible alibi, 2) you are arrested and this causes a significant detriment to you (no, missing a couple article on slashdot doesn't count) and 3) you can prove that there was malice aforethough (ie. they really WERE out to get you!). As for comdex, they have a LEGAL right to enforce any policy they see fit (private organization and all.) You don't have to like it, but, hell... you don't have to go either. I constantly hear people whine about "the security" at their job, the mall, concerts, conventions, et al. an I always tell 'em the same thing: Shut the hell up, I Hate whining... if you don't like it DON'T GO! plain and simple; but, don't expect anyone to bend to your whining cuz you can't bring your li'l tote bag... no one gives a shit! Please, do us all a favour and get a clue before referencing the law again... thank you and good night.

      God Bless America, and her leader Mr. President, George W. Bush!

    3. Re:Not required to carry ID anywhere by psamuels · · Score: 1
      In what state was that? In every state I have lived in, you are required to have (at the age of 18), either a VALID and CURRENT driver's license, or a CURRENT state ID.

      Kansas. I for one do not have either of those things, and I've been on this side of 18 for quite awhile. You certainly can get a state ID, but I've never heard that it's required, and for myself, I don't see the point. It's not like I own a car, or want one.

      --
      "How can you claim that you are anti-crack, while still writing a window manager?" — Metacity README
    4. Re:Not required to carry ID anywhere by morgue-ann · · Score: 1

      In every state I have lived in, you are required to have (at the age of 18), either a VALID and CURRENT driver's license, or a CURRENT state ID.

      You must not have lived in California. We have a statute on the books which requires production of "valid" ID on demand by a LEO, but it was struck down because "valid" was "vague" by the Supreme Court in the Kolender v. Lawson case.

      There's a doctrine called "freedom of movement" with which "you papers please" requests interfere. Read this for some info/background.

      Closing society to those who don't want to give up all their rights is not acceptable simply because you've given them a choice. Comdex is not a great example, but how about not being able to fly without being cavity searched? You suffer if you refuse to participate in such a system 'cause you think that's going too far.

  30. Erm, not a likely target by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 2

    A bunch of religious- and political- minded terrorists, suddenly getting the idea to terrorize Comdex?? What the hell. Reminds me of a tag line from a recent This is True story:

    The 21st Century Egotist: someone who thinks they're important enough to be a target.

    Anyway, if they ban bags, does that mean I have to carry my anthrax spores, 7-inch locking blade knives, and explosives in a box? How inconvenient!

  31. not better late than never by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...not so funny when it's 11 minutes behind the first time it was told in this thread. Get off the stage.

  32. true of all pre-emptive justice by Erris · · Score: 1
    If you don't believe that even the most repressive measures will fail, just ask yourself how Palestinians manage to make bombs and kill people from within concentration camps. Ethinic profiling, strip searches, x-ray machines, superman and 3.5 billion dollars of US aid per year can not stop a determined group of men.

    The only solution is to treat all inocent men as equals and remove the guilty from society. Injustice is self defeating.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
    1. Re:true of all pre-emptive justice by FallLine · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Bull. Which one of these terrorists were Palestinians? None. Which one of these terrorists had any direct claim against the US? None. Most of these terrorists led relatively middle class life styles and can't reasonably claim to have suffered at the hands of the US.

      What's more, why should I believe that US action, or in action, will make a damn bit of difference when they believe blatantly untrue lies printed in their media and from the various religious zealots. 95% of the propaganda that these terrorists hear is simply untrue.

      If they're really going against their suppossed oppressors, why the US of all places? It's totally disproportionate. The Soviet Union and many European powers did VASTLY more damage to the middle east than the US has ever done, in whole or in part.

      This has far more to do with pride, or lack thereof. They believe they are the chosen people. The United States, being the most visible superpower, must be cheating them somehow, because why else are they still living in poverty, by and large, and us infidels are living it large? The United States and the Jews are generally being used as a scapegoat.

      Furthermore, if these terrorist and sympathetic Arabs are really concerned for the plight of their fellow Arabs (generally not themselves), why is it that they have done so little to help as a group?

    2. Re:true of all pre-emptive justice by mpe · · Score: 2

      What's more, why should I believe that US action, or in action, will make a damn bit of difference when they believe blatantly untrue lies printed in their media and from the various religious zealots. 95% of the propaganda that these terrorists hear is simply untrue.

      So the way you deal with this is through propaganda. Also there is probably a lot more truth to the propaganda since the US started bombing Afganistan.

    3. Re:true of all pre-emptive justice by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2

      Um, I feel to see how your response relates to its parent. Palestinians are, in fact, making bombs while under intense scrutiny and lockdown, and killing people with them. (Remember, 9/11 is neither the first nor last word in Middle East violence. It's that sort of myopia which earns the US much of its reputation as, erm, myopic.) The posters point was the fact that security measures can never be completely foolproof for most activities.

    4. Re:true of all pre-emptive justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      concentration camps ????????????

      these people live in refugee camps because thier leaders want them to so they can go around the world killing people and claim they are suffering.

  33. No Cameras??? by DAldredge · · Score: 1

    That must mean the Bill Gates/Microsoft must be doing a BIG demo this year....

    1. Re:No Cameras??? by AnimeFreak · · Score: 1

      It would be kind of ironic if the convention centre explodes after a BSOD occurs during this "BIG demo."

  34. SEMA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was at the SEMA show last week at the Las Vegas Convention center. While they allowed bags, and didn't care about laptops, security was tight. All bags were searched at the front door..

  35. maybe it'll help a little.... by jeffy124 · · Score: 2

    ... not having laptops may help billy not show off his BSOD like he did 3 years ago

    --
    The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    1. Re:maybe it'll help a little.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah i was at that Win98 demo. Gates had one of his top developers demoing some scanner plug-n-play feature. So the guy plugged the scanner and the screen went blue. A sudden hush overtook the crowd and was followed by a standing ovation and some (actually a lot) laughter. Gates then made some comment like "well that's why we arent shipping windows 98 yet"

    2. Re:maybe it'll help a little.... by man_ls · · Score: 2

      That's Murphey's Law for you, extended a bit by Thurgood's Corollary (it's on a poster in my CS classroom)

      "Anything that can possibly go wrong, will go wrong, and not only in the worst technically possible way, but in the way that generates the worst pr and lowers everyone's opinion of your product."

      Something like that.

  36. This just in... by Cylix · · Score: 4, Funny

    Apparently security coordinators at COMDEX read slashdot. They especially noted the satirical remarks regarding: "What next, strip searches?".

    Security personal were noted as saying, "Thats a great idea!" While some were skeptical, others went so far as to improve on the now open source communities ideas. Later, a unanimous decision yeilded on implementing open source specifications for strip searches with body cavity investigations. These would later be utilized at the convention.

    COMDEX Security Marshals have decided to fully develope this open source concept and protocals. They are currently in talks with several venture capitalists to fund a new e-commerce web site. No further details were provided at the time of announcement.

    Additionaly it should be noted that have been talks concerning a fork in the now ongoing works. One security personal was quite upset with the current implementation.

    "I just don't like limiting myself to one hand. Power user's should be able to use two if they really want."

    --
    "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    1. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hmm... I guess we should warn everyone not to mention psychological screen, huh?Oops!D*mn!


      - firewall

    2. Re:This just in... by cballowe · · Score: 0

      COMDEX Security Marshals have decided to fully develope this open source concept and protocals. They are currently in talks with several venture capitalists to fund a new e-commerce web site. No further details were provided at the time of announcement.

      Don't you mean "Open Sores"?

    3. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I just don't like limiting myself to one hand. Power user's should be able to use two if they really want."

      I think already been some prior art in the two hand approach as evidenced by this.

    4. Re:This just in... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      ...
      Later, a unanimous decision yeilded on implementing open source specifications for strip searches with body cavity investigations. These would later be utilized at the convention.
      COMDEX Security Marshals have decided to fully develope this open source concept and protocals.
      protocals ??? Did you mean proctocol???
    5. Re:This just in... by ab762 · · Score: 1

      Can we start a list of COMDEX attendees I least want to see naked?

    6. Re:This just in... by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > What next, strip searches?". Security personal were noted as saying, "Thats a great idea!"

      Hey, it's COMDEX Vegas. Always did have more strippers than techies...

  37. This is horrible. by RyanFenton · · Score: 1


    While at E3, the only officially vendor-supplied bags were the X-Box bags from Microsoft. Just get a look at it here. It does not function well as a swag bag at all. The chords bite quite sharply into one's shoulders, especially after a long day of showing off your press pass and getting free stuff, much less three in a row!

    So unless vendors make a bag which can make a bag that can both hold everything the combined marketing departments of at least a dozen determined companies can hand out, AND guarantee that it won't be used for suspicious purposes, it's just going to cause undue pain to all involved.

    ;^)

    Ryan Fenton

  38. Thank the dear Lord in heaven! by Wonko42 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Thank God for these restrictions!

    Now we just have to pray that nobody carries a bomb under their coat, or a gun in their pocket, or anthrax in a plastic baggie, or a Potential Enemy Neutralizer in their shirt pocket, or a pointy steel-toed boot...

    Come to think of it, I won't feel safe until everyone is naked.

    Save me, O Comdex, from the evil, evil terrorists!

    1. Re:Thank the dear Lord in heaven! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I won't feel safe until everyone is naked.

      Sure, until some terrorist frenchie with a buttload of Anthrax farts in your general direction!

    2. Re:Thank the dear Lord in heaven! by Mandelbrute · · Score: 1
      Come to think of it, I won't feel safe until everyone is naked.
      Just think how much could be hidden under all of those beer guts.
    3. Re:Thank the dear Lord in heaven! by man_ls · · Score: 5, Funny

      Trust me, if the CS class at my high school is any indication, there would be (1) hot-looking female type, (10) potentially attractive to the opposite sex male types (i.e., not fat and know what a razor is), and (89) fat, unshaven, socially slightly off people.

      You really wouldn't be any safer, and probably emotionally scared.

      I like to think I'm 1/10...but still, please, keep your clothes on.

    4. Re:Thank the dear Lord in heaven! by Maskirovka · · Score: 1

      What about big men with strong hands? Surely you should ban strong hands too, as they could be used to strangle people!

    5. Re:Thank the dear Lord in heaven! by csbruce · · Score: 1

      I won't feel safe until everyone is naked.

      Just go to the porn show upstairs.

    6. Re:Thank the dear Lord in heaven! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just choked on my beer. lol.

    7. Re:Thank the dear Lord in heaven! by dotmaudot · · Score: 1

      Come to think of it, I won't feel safe until everyone is naked. Do you? Think at all those kamikaze, who are ready to eat a clockwork bomb and to spread their guts all around the place. True, a bomb is quite difficult to swallow, but maybe some surgeoning may do the trick. ciao, .mau.

    8. Re:Thank the dear Lord in heaven! by bugg · · Score: 2
      You should be more concerned about someone carrying an infectious disease.

      We must all hope that smallpox has not fallen into the wrong hands, yes, but there are other deadly diseases out there. Ebola, anyone?

      --
      -bugg
    9. Re:Thank the dear Lord in heaven! by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

      The markup of my former CS class:
      4 Incredibly hot women
      2 okay looking women
      1 Ugly as hell woman
      10 not bad looking men
      7 average looking men
      1 350 pound guy
      1 pimple faced and generally ugly guy

      of course I only noticed the four hot women and one of the okay looking women, because I was in the same group as three of the hot women and the okay looking woman. And as one of the women said, when they decided to have a little fun with me, and REALLY snuggle up close - I'm definately heterosexual.

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    10. Re:Thank the dear Lord in heaven! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Come to think of it, I won't feel safe until everyone is naked.


      uh - in that case, try Adultdex

  39. Damn Usama Bin Ladden! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If that bitch hadn't sent his minions none of this would be happening.

    I'd pay $500 to get a punch or two in on that dude.

  40. Comdex is dying by sulli · · Score: 4, Funny
    We should all keep in mind this simple truth: Comdex is dying.

    You don't need to be Kreskin to predict Comdex's future. The hand writing is on the wall: Comdex faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for Comdex because Comdex is dying. Things are looking very bad for Comdex. As many of us are already aware, Comdex continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood.

    Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.

    Famed Comdex speaker Spencer F. Katt states that there are 7000 visitors to Comdex. How many visitors to Networld/Interop are there? Let's see. The number of Comdex versus Networld/Interop posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 Networld/Interop visitors. LinuxWorld posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of Networld/Interop posts. Therefore there are about 700 visitors to LinuxWorld. A recent article put Windows World at about 80 percent of the trade show market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 Windows World visitors. This is consistent with the number of Windows World Usenet posts.

    Due to the troubles of Comdex taxi lines, abysmal attendance and so on, The Interface Group went out of business and was taken over by Softbank who run other troubled trade shows. Now Softbank is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house.

    All major surveys show that Comdex has steadily declined in market share. Comdex is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If Comdex is to survive at all it will be among trade show hobbyists, dabblers, and dilettantes. Comdex continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, Comdex is dead.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:Comdex is dying by enneff · · Score: 1

      heh heh

      clever in a simple way

  41. Passport?? by tcc · · Score: 5, Funny
    >. "While on-site, you should CARRY A PHOTO ID (DRIVER'S LICENSE OR PASSPORT) ON YOU AT ALL TIMES."

    I use Microsoft Passport, it's a tech show afterall no?, MS passport is the Most Secure Thing available, Microsoft told us you guys do support latest technologies that big corporations shove at us, no? yeah... it's your sponsors....what? sorry, but it's in my laptop that you didn't want me to bring in at the entrance.

    Joking aside, I have one word for comdex since a few years... unorganized computer flea market... And it could be so much more, computers did take off since 5 years with the internet and all that, why did Comdex go completely the opposite direction?

    --
    --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
  42. MOD parent *=2 by belg4mit · · Score: 1

    *=2;

    PS> I hate oskin' slashdot lameness prevention crap. There must be a better way.

    --
    Were that I say, pancakes?
  43. Oh, come on now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've seen the type of people who go to computer conventions. Sure, some are young, thin, and attractive, but most of us are older, heavier, and shaggier, and you really *don't* want to see us naked just because it pretends to increase security ....

  44. terrorism is such a great excuse by mj6798 · · Score: 2

    Now, people who either don't want to have their actions documented or who like to profit even more from images and ideas that really belong to the public can use the excuse of combatting terrorism to exclude cameras from even more places. Well, compared to the other things terrorism has been used as an excuse for (vastly expanded police powers, lots of layoffs and business failures, almost complete abolition of civil rights for immigrants), I suppose this one is still fairly minor.

  45. Ummm, it's not a bag, sir." by xFoz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Guard: Sorry no bags!
    Me: It's not a bag it's a case.
    Guard: No laptops. No cases. No kidding.
    Me: I left the laptop at home.
    Guard: What's in the "case" then?
    Me: Stuff. You know. My camera, PDA, cell phone, GPS, DriveWallet, GameBoy, portable CD player, a MP3 player, this runs a wireless Linux server (holding up a SBC with a short antennae) which is grabbing frames from the camera on my hat.
    Guard (holding hand on head): Oh, just go. NEXT!!!

    Guard: Sorry no bags!
    Next me: It's not a bag, it's a valise.

    1. Re:Ummm, it's not a bag, sir." by LazyDawg · · Score: 2

      If bags are banned, how can chick geeks (of which I'm sure there are a few going to Comdex) possibly bring their purse or handbag in? Will they have to wear a stylish yet goofy-looking fanny pack, or would that count too?

      And can't you sneak a gun in under your shirt, or strap a bomb to your chest, or keep a holster inside your jacket? Silly security people. What they SHOULD be doing to increase brand-name recognition is not allow any logos on jackets or tee-shirts unless they can provide a reciept from a Comdex vendor.

      --
      "Look at me, I invented the stove!" -- Ben Franklin
    2. Re:Ummm, it's not a bag, sir." by Rogerborg · · Score: 2, Troll
      • If bags are banned, how can chick geeks (of which I'm sure there are a few going to Comdex) possibly bring their purse or handbag in? Will they have to wear a stylish yet goofy-looking fanny pack, or would that count too

      Gee, maybe if you weren't such a lazy fuck, you could have read the actual security policy and found out. You lazy fuck.

      • "Anyone carrying a purse or fanny-pack will be asked to go through a security check"
      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    3. Re:Ummm, it's not a bag, sir." by Cyberdyne · · Score: 1
      "Anyone carrying a purse or fanny-pack will be asked to go through a security check"

      Nothing wrong with that, IMO; in Houston this summer, I was helping with the Ballunar festival, and there were bag searches on the gate there. (Not by us volunteer security people; searches were done by the State Guard military police, for some reason.) A nice event, and I didn't see anyone objecting to the bag checks while I was on...

  46. Better not to have strip searches by zaius · · Score: 1, Redundant

    ... I don't think I'd want to see most of the people at COMDEX less than fully clothed.

  47. That's nothing... by phillymjs · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    ...at AdultDex, the porn stars are being asked to leave their non-AdultDex-issued fun-bags in their rooms!

    My 200th /. post!

    ~Philly

  48. Scamming bags from vendors by billstewart · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just in case there are any vendors who haven't figured out the hot giveaway items that will get people to stop by your booth this Comdex, it's obviously plastic bags for carrying around literature , t-shirts, CDs, and other trinkets from other vendors. It's really a sinister plot by the plastic bag makers.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  49. Cute... by brogdon · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    "CNET is reporting that COMDEX organizers have a new security policy--no bags except vendor supplied plastic bags will allowed on the show floor. "While on-site, you should CARRY A PHOTO ID (DRIVER'S LICENSE OR PASSPORT) ON YOU AT ALL TIMES." They want you to leave your laptop in your hotel room, too! Oh, and no cameras at the keynotes, either. But they haven't announced that they're planning to strip search people ... yet."

    Go ahead and bitch about the extra security measures, 'cause God knows you'll probably be the first person to start screaming about how irresponsible they were if something happens. You want to know you're safe at a large gathering of Americans? Then you should be prepared to deal with simple, common-sense security provisions, even if it makes it a wee bit harder to carry all your lame IBM-hearts-Linux tchochkes home with you.

    Not all security is an instant breach of your rights, people. If you can't handle COMDEX adding some extra measures to keep their visitors secure, don't go. It's a free country.

    --


    This tagline is umop apisdn.
    1. Re:Cute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use your head...

      If I can create a bomb small enough to fit in a laptop, I can create a bomb small enough to slip under my coat. 'No bags and no laptops' is not a 'simple common-sense security provision', it's at best a knee-jerk we-must-appear-to-care response with little thought, and at worst it's an excuse, as another poster said, to ensure that people have to pay outrageous convention prices for food, and force them to carry around the advertising of the sponsors.

    2. Re:Cute... by loraksus · · Score: 2

      I never saw a suicide bomber holding a bag. They usually have explosives (gasp) taped to their bodies. And ball bearings and other nasties.

      This, as with most of the bullshit that is being implemented is security through stupidity. It is a herd mentality that makes everyone feel that they are safe.

      You're not fucking safe.

      Imagine this: 4 men walk into comdex with Glocks (shoulder holster). 20 rounds in a clip, 4 shooters have time to cycle through 4,5,6 clips before the cops get there (easily). This ain't CS or Scarface, you shoot someone, they go down, aim and they stay down. (Give the shooters angel dust for the hell of it.)
      Nice fuckin massacre if you just do that. Take a MAC-10 to discourage hero's. . .
      4x6x20 = 480 people, lets call it 400, wasted bullets, fat fuckers that take 2 shots to go down, you know - All in less than 5 minutes.

      A shooting massacre of 400 people would certainly make people hesitant to goto any tradeshows, or even the mall. It's fuckin' scare the shit out of the public, but thats the idea.

      Combine that with ebola (flood the fire system with a solution, which will be dispersed when you set off the alarms, so that when the fuckload of ems people come in, they get infected, which infects the doctors, the hospitals, and so on. You got at least 12 hours (very, very conservative) before _anyone_ shows symthoms. . .
      There you go - guide to 20,000 deaths, a VERY conservative estimate. Shit, culture strep bacteria for a week, dry it out and then mortar and pestle the result - disperse that and see how many people get sick - nearly half of the strains are drug resistant.

      Look. Right now, all the security is based on the "Good citizens, please do not bring your bad things into here. If you do, we will ask you to leave" principle. Moreover, if you're security guards are unarmed 65 year old men, younger, fatter men, or well past middle aged women the only security they provide is subtracting one bullet from what may of have been allocated for you. I'm not being dark, only realistic, if someone wants to go apeshit and start a massacre, there is nothing that can be done about it.
      (Case in point, the school shootings, esp Columbine - where the fucking coward police and SWAT sat outside while people were being shot inside.)

      The only thing this will change is that a shitload of laptops will get stolen from hotel rooms, the vending mother fuckers who charge $3 for a coke will make more money, the terrorists, should they desire to come, will carry fake id's and walk in with their "bad things" in the vendor supplied bags that they got the day before.

      Oh.

      That and fucking sheep will feel safer and the wanna-be police will get their jollies because they have some power and get to strip search the booth babes.

      /finger

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  50. Ummmm, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Great, now i need a license to heat my house and buy miracle grow.

  51. Here's what I'm hoping: by Zalgon+26+McGee · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Boothbabes and body cavity searches! A Winning combination!

    --

    ---

    Book(n): Utensil used to pass time while waiting for the TV repairman

  52. Exceptions.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Exceptions for the no-bag rule will be made for exhibitors and members of the media."

    http://www.siliconvalley.com/docs/news/svfront/0 06 399.htm

    (and/or mad bombers pretending to be exhibitors etc.)

    Now where did I put that Illustrator template for making fake press ID's...fire up the laminator Igor!

    1. Re:Exceptions.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Al-quada would never impersonate the press just to off one guy in a susuicide attack.

  53. Theft by TheMCP · · Score: 4, Informative

    You realize, of course, that this means there will be an abnormally large percentage of hotel rooms in the area with laptops in them, and thieves will know it...

    I wouldn't go to any conference that required me to leave my laptop in an unattended room, particularly if I knew people like maids had keys.

    The truth is, short of a strip search and body cavity search of each and every attendee, there's no way they can ensure people won't bring something dangerous into the conference. If they want to try a few basic security procedures like metal detectors and xrays to help ensure that ordinary everyday lunatics don't come in with guns and big knives, sure, that's nice. Anything else is pointless excess.

    1. Re:Theft by Animats · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The truth is, short of a strip search and body cavity search of each and every attendee, there's no way they can ensure people won't bring something dangerous into the conference.

      Oh, yes there is. Check out the AS&E Backscatter X-Ray BodySearch(tm) system. Used in prisons now; coming soon to your local airport, office building, etc.

    2. Re:Theft by loraksus · · Score: 2

      Yes, I see. Access to drugs for prisoners has been completely cut off.
      BTW, nothing is stopping people from whipping out their pistol of choice and creating holes in the security people before running inside, screaming "Ahalu Akbar" (or whatever they want) and blowing themselves (and others) up.
      And as George Carlin said, "You can probably beat a guy to death using a Sunday New York Times"

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    3. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The truth is, short of a strip search and body cavity search of each and every attendee, there's no way they can ensure people won't bring something dangerous into the conference.

      If you think strip searches and body cavity searches keep things from passing through security, you've got a thing or two to learn about prisons.

    4. Re:Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I wouldn't go to any conference that required me to leave my laptop in an unattended room, particularly if I knew people like maids had keys.

      And I suppose using the in-room safe, or the safe in the lobby (ask at checkin) is just too much of a bother, hmmm?...

  54. Can I still bring my towel. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never go anywhere without it.

  55. Re:I take the open source chant and modify it thus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Security through absurdity.

    "The combination is: 1-2-3-4-5...
    -?!-
    That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard! It's the kind of combination an idiot would have on his luggage!"

  56. Well that sucks. by Evil_Furby · · Score: 0

    I can see it now. The FBI guy from Beavis and Butthead Do America will be ordering his men to give attendees full cavity searches. "Go Roto Rooter on him!"

    --
    OH NOES! TEH INTARWEB IS BORKEN!
    1. Re:Well that sucks. by Evil_Furby · · Score: 0
      • WEEEEEE no one ever reads my post now. WEEHAW! I bet you won't even see this retarded post!!!!! RAWR!!!!!! lmao
      --
      OH NOES! TEH INTARWEB IS BORKEN!
  57. no, Security Consultants by Jburkholder · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Yes sir, Mr. Convention Director sir. We at fly-by-night security consulting and TV/VCR repair, Inc. have a fool-proof plan to provide heightened security measures for COMDEX!"

    "Oh, good. Load off my mind."

    "Don't you want to hear what it is?"

    "Not really, no."

    "Oh, well... I see. In that case, can you just sign right here?"

  58. Non sequitur by FallLine · · Score: 2
    somebody on the radio pointed out that as we get better and better at stopping individual acts, the response is for a smaller number of more dedicated enemy to plan more thoroughly. So, for example, the number of hijackings has long been on the decline, but the number of people killed in each hijacking has gone way up.
    This doesn't really follow.

    Firstly, we have traditionally had virtually no defence against terrorism, because we have had very little of it compared to, say, Europe. Yet we had the single biggest act of terrorism, probably of anywhere. It's not as if the same primitive attacks that have been seen in Europe and elsewhere could not have been used against US.

    Secondly, while the only reasonable response to better security would be more competent terrorists, that does not necessarily mean that the number of lives lost would go up. There may be a real lack of more capable terrorists out there in the world (and that's completely ignoring recruitment issues and such). The aggregate damage may still be less.

    All in all, there evidence simply isn't there to make this assertion. It may be true that the number of deaths in terrorism shot way up in this year for the US, but there are a zillion other possible reasons for this. e.g., external politics, economic reasons, bad luck (hardly a large population here to draw from), a new resolve on the part of the terrorists (irrespective of our security), and so on. To suggest that we should loosen or not tighten our security is frankly foolish. So-called men like Osama bin Laden want to cause as much damage and fear as they can to further their objectives, so why should we believe that they might hold anything back? How can more security, providing it's reasonable and in proportion, cause more deaths? At the very least, it raises the bar substantially for bin Laden's organization.
    1. Re:Non sequitur by FallLine · · Score: 2
      what do you mean it doesn't follow? I'm not going to look it up for you, but the guy on the radio [this was on NPR.org a week or two ago... they have audio archives] said (and I believe him because I have no reason not to) that the number of hijackings per year has gone down, and the number of people killed in hijackings has gone up. If this is indeed a reality, it "follows" even if you don't have a theory to explain it. Don't blame me, I'm just reporting what I remember hearing.
      What doesn't follow is the implication that arresting the amateur terrorists leads to _more_ committed terrorists in absolute terms or that more people die as a result.

      Furthermore, it makes little sense to make sweeping conclusions from the apparent surge in terrorism, because it's so rare. e.g., Maybe bin Laden felt like bombing today because it's the 10th aniversary of yadda yadda yadda. It just takes one MAN (or a collective small group ) to cause this kind of destruction that represents a major spike on our charts.

      Ah, now that you've expended much blood, sweat, and tears thinking about this, you've arrived at the starting point the guy on the radio was talking about: yes, and in raising the bar, you increase the scale and sophistication of any successful attack, and with scale and sophistication comes capability, and by raising the cost you raise the payoff they look for.
      It only follows that we raise the payoff that they look for, if they were previously restraining themselves. If they're already fighting as hard as they know how, our cutting their JV-line is not going to make their Varsity efforts any more effective. Why should I, or anyone else, believe this to be untrue? If they're going to kill themselves, then one can reasonably conclude that they're going to want to inflict as much damage as possible. Anyways, this argument is really very academic, because it's a stretch to assert that the line was raised in any meaningful way in the US.
    2. Re:Non sequitur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What doesn't follow is the implication that arresting the amateur terrorists leads to _more_ committed terrorists in absolute terms or that more people die as a result.

      I didn't say anything about arresting amateur terrorists, that's your straw man. I believe the discussion is about deterrence. But, since we do see more committed terrorists, and more people have died as a result, "Lucy, you have some esplaining to do." Does your hypothesis (which doesn't even square with the data, let alone offer any predictions) use magic to account for the history of Middle Eastern terrorism over the past half century? this isn't just about the WTC (another of your strawmen), this is about the bombs and planes in Europe and the middle east too. The data is on my side.

      it makes little sense to make sweeping conclusions from the the apparent surge in terrorism, because it's so rare

      more bullshit you've made up on the spot: the data shows a decline in the number of hijackings, not a surge, fuckstick. the same data shows an steady increase in the number of victims.

      If they're already fighting as hard as they know how

      another straw man: what if they weren't fighting as hard as they know how, or they didn't know as much? it's a feedback system (know what that is?) so our actions affect theirs. they learn; more of them get more pissed off; they raise more money; they plan more. it's like any kind of problem solving... hmm, maybe you don't know anything about problem solving. Look at it this way: the US military is much more sophisticated and capable today. Is it because we held back before?

      I don't even know why I'm wasting my time on past like you. They guy I listened to was on the radio because he was an expert, he knew what he was talking about, and his explanation at least went in the same direction as the data. You are pretending that the number of people to die in hijackings has gone down in order to make the data fit your preconceptions, and then you keep suggesting things that I didn't say so you can knock them down.

      moron.

  59. Re:why timothy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you used to be funny back when you were racist but now you are just a goat sex troll

  60. Stops 802.11 Hax0rz :-) by billstewart · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Comdex isn't Interop, and it's been a long time since Interop was Interop either. The only good reason to haul a laptop around the show floor is to do 802.11 scanning. This is a huge show, and you're there to see the sights and pick up either information or trinkets from vendors, exchange business cards, and maybe get job interviews. Your PDA may be helpful, but your laptop is just dead weight.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  61. Big show, important industry, immense hype factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    I don't know how many people show up for Comdex these days; I think their peak attendance was something like a quarter million, in an industry that's important to the economy, with a PR business that's designed for maximum hype about what all the big companies are showing off. Las Vegas has enough trouble dealing with the problem that most attendees aren't gamblers :-)

    They at least want to discourage the wanabee terrorists from showing up.

  62. Also note that... by swordboy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Please note that laptop security cables are no longer allowed as carry on pieces. Apparently they can be used as a weapon (noose). The airports *will* conficate them if you have one in a carry on bag. Check it and save yourself the money (around $40)...

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:Also note that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While they are at it, they should just kill all the passengers before they are allowed to board. That ought to increase security.

    2. Re:Also note that... by peccary · · Score: 2

      And in other news, shorting a NiCd battery creates a hell of a fire. I guess the Lithium batteries would probably burn well, too.

    3. Re:Also note that... by necrognome · · Score: 1

      Does anyone have a link to the above? The latest info on the FAA site seems to suggest otherwise.

      --


      Let's get drunk and delete production data!
  63. Bean bags? by scumdamn · · Score: 1

    For some reason, every time I read this headline I see "Bans Bean Bags".

  64. Unions by FallLine · · Score: 2

    Hahah, so true, I've worked a couple conventions for my company. The teamsters and like unions at these convention centers really rip the exhibitors off. It's completely ridiculous. Granted, many of these companies rip themselves off, with completely excessive ~million dollar booths and such, but some of the crap that you have to put up with is unbelievable. My company would give out these stuffed animals as give aways...lots of them. The unions/convention center would force us to have them carry these _very_ light boxes for point A to point B (no more than 500 feet away) claiming union regulations (or "safety", hah), rip us off in process, then on top of that take their sweet time and expect quid pro quo at the end if they did their jobs half decently.

  65. strip seach...eeww by Maskirovka · · Score: 1

    I would feel bad for the poor bastard that would have to strip search me. Heh.

    1. Re:strip seach...eeww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      guard: turn around and spread 'em
      me: ok, make sure you look real close in there because I think I might have left a little bag of anthrax up my ass. It's way back there tho, so you might want to call for some backup...

  66. No strip searches? Too bad... by barzok · · Score: 3, Funny

    that's all the action a lot of those people get all year.

  67. One baggy could kill everyone reading this, easy. by Neuticle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At the kick-ass Whitman College (www.whitman.edu) I'm now taking microbiology as well as Islamic civ. This has provided me with some nice insight into recent events, so getting to the point:
    One mL of a liquid Anthrax culture probably contains well over 30 million cells of Bacillus Anthrax (I've done counts of related bacteria). If just those cells were induced into sporulation, dried, and ground so that the clusters were of the right size to inhale (weaponized), a sandwich baggy would be over-kill. If distributed into the HVAC system, everyone in the building would likely be infected. Fortunately, while anthrax is easy to culture (most bacteria are), it is fairly difficult to
    weaponize properly.
    If they were to use smallpox though, things would be far uglier. If someone managed to bring a concentrated sample of smallpox virus in to a big show and stationed themselves strategically, they could probably infect half the people. The nasty bit is that those infected people would then go home and start infecting everyone they came into contact with for the next 10 days, without knowing, while the virus incubated. After 10 days, the show people would start to get REAL sick, while the people that they infected would run around for another 10 days, infecting more people. INSTANT epidemic, since vaccinations were stopped over 30 years ago

    It's like a pyramid scheme, but instead of money you get a nasty, disfiguring, sometimes fatal disease.

    --
    "I think the best medicine for the human soul is kind words, chicken soup,
    and lots of whiskey."
    - Professor Ashfield

    --
    "Cheeze it!" - Bender
  68. make sure they... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...tattoo your registration number onto your arm so that they can verify your identity. Remember: it's for your protection.

  69. Guilty until you spread 'em by Saeger · · Score: 2
    But they haven't announced that they're planning to strip search people ... yet.

    Well, you know ... if they were Customs Officers, they could check your rectum for fingernail clippers if you looked at them the wrong way; and if you happened to have any outgoing international snailmail on you, they could read that too -- and these searches will be completely constitutional IF it becomes law.

    I feel safer already.

    --
    Power to the Peaceful
    1. Re:Guilty until you spread 'em by Neuticle · · Score: 1

      No, the searches will not be constitutional just because they are passed into law. The supreme court gets to decide on that matter. If they are passed, which seems likely, the ACLU will probably wait until the hysterics settle, then mount a huge campaign to over turn them. Since these new laws likely violate large chunks of what some of us lovingly call "constitutional rights" they will hopefully be tossed out like the garbage that they are. It's just to bad that they will be on the books for any time at all, and that we will have to waste the good time and money to get rid of them.

      --
      "Cheeze it!" - Bender
  70. Smallpox schmalpox by ergo98 · · Score: 2

    As scary as smallpox sounds, it's a non-discriminating disease, meaning that anyone looking to use it had better plan for all their own people to die too. Anthrax works for terrorists because there's very little chance of something mailed to Washington D.C. hurting people in Afghanistan or whatever. While it's easy to portray all these terrorists as simply insane, they do have a motivation (an INCREDIBLY racist and zealotous motivation, but nonetheless) that isn't driven purely by insanity.

    It reminds me of the "cold war" with the Soviety Union: The military-industrial complex (yup it really exists) wants to sell weapons, and to do that they need everyone to believe that the Soviets were a bunch of land hungry maniacs who were just dying for the chance to press the big red button, yet the reality is that the USSR was family men and woman who wanted to just live their lives just like everyone in the US. Nonetheless the misguided nuclear fear was driven by the propaganda that the godless USSR empire was suicidal.

    1. Re:Smallpox schmalpox by rtaylor · · Score: 2

      Hmm.. so it would have to be a suicide mission huh? I've heard of them doing those before.

      --
      Rod Taylor
    2. Re:Smallpox schmalpox by ergo98 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Is Bin Laden dead? The reality is that the suicide bombers are generally the suckers, but the people calling the shots are directing the actions based around their own well being and the general well being of their society. Lots of Japanese were hurled out to die in World War II, but once the Emporor felt personally at risk from nuclear weapons (no longer was he immune) the war suddenly ended. Smallpox would not be contained to North America, so anyone using it would pretty much be wiping out their own societies (in fact they would moreso be wiping out their own societies given poor sanitation, inadequate healthcare, etc.) : Not really an effective measure.

      If you're measuring the enemy by the suckers, if you will, who died in the aircraft then you are foolish. They were mere pawns for others (and I'll bet you for a split second before crashing into the building they thought "Hrmmm...what if there isn't an eternal afterlife of bliss and heaven?". It reminds me a hilarious Simpsons were Maude Flanders is rescued and she states "Oooh Neddy : I almost thought I was going to the place of eternal bliss and salvation!" and that right there points out the hilarious paradox of religion)

    3. Re:Smallpox schmalpox by GMontag451 · · Score: 1
      It reminds me a hilarious Simpsons were Maude Flanders is rescued and she states "Oooh Neddy : I almost thought I was going to the place of eternal bliss and salvation!" and that right there points out the hilarious paradox of religion)


      "Every tear shed at a funeral is evidence for atheism." - author unknown (to me at least)

    4. Re:Smallpox schmalpox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Every tear shed at a funeral is evidence for atheism." - author unknown (to me at least)

      I'm an athiest and i don't believe that for a second. Grieving/crying is the minds way of getting over the loss of someone/something. Whether they've gone to a place of eternal bliss and salvation, of fire and butt poking pitchforks, or just gone, they've certainly gone from this world.

    5. Re:Smallpox schmalpox by archen · · Score: 1

      I think that your comparison to WWII is slightly off. I'm not sure that Emperor Hirohito was so much concerned about his own safety as he was for that of the people. I'm sure he started to think that if the bombs started killing hundreds of thousands of people at a time, that it was very possible that there would be no Japanese left in existence. It's also true that he probably thought of himself (being only human and all), but if he HAD died, I doubt the Japanese would have listened to anyone BUT him, and the fighting would have gone on for years. I think after the war Hirohito sort of gracefully accepted defeat, and unconditionally surrendered to insure that his people would survive. The rest of his life was generally spent in obscurity tending his garden.

      But yeah, it does seem like the Afghans are being used as pawns in all of this - so it seems like a much different situation.

    6. Re:Smallpox schmalpox by operagost · · Score: 1

      No, it's evidence that people have a heart and miss their loved ones when they're gone. Or they're just selfish, take your pick.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    7. Re:Smallpox schmalpox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something tells me that author is unknown for a reason.

  71. Quick! Try to look like you're doing something! by jcr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For christ's sake, if they want people to be safe at Comdex, just let them strap on their sidearms. When's the last time anyone went berzerk and committed mass murder at a gun show?

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  72. Hahahaha! by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 1

    Dammit, where's my mod points when I need 'em? For the love of all that is sacred and holy on Slashdot, somebody mod this up.

    --
    "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
    1. Re:Hahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got mod and until I read your reply I was ready to flamebait it down one... I just dont get it.

    2. Re:Hahahaha! by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 1

      The premise is something like this.

      --
      "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
    3. Re:Hahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And of course there have been many variations over the years...

  73. Comdex follows National Computer Conference... by satch89450 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...down the drain. Remember when the NCC was the biggest show going, when they were able to completely fill McCormick Place in Chicago, and then dwindled down to 20, count'em 20 tables before the NCC show organizers saw the handwriting on the wall and converted the NCC back to a research-only show?

    The Computer Dealers Exposition (that's what COMDEX stands for, boys and girls) outgrew its original charter almost a decade ago -- how many dealers make the trip in? Damn few that I know. Today, it's the press and the companies themselves that make up the bulk of the show, along with employees of the Fortune 5000 companies that are still making enough money to keep the travel budget stuffed.

    Speaking of the press, have you noticed that a lot of magazine and newsletter titles have closed in the past 12 months? Have you noticed that the amount of computer-trade ink has fallen off tremendously? For example, we just lost SmartPartner Magazine today, according to reports.

    I know quite a number of the members of the press who have decided to forgo the annual pilgrimage to Las Vegas, either because they don't have jobs/assignments or because they want no part of a large, concentrated crowd of people at something that is uniquely United States.

    One benefit to the Death Of COMDEX is the end of the maniac development cycle that requires companies to "show something" according to a calendar set by someone else. We may well see all software companies release software when it's ready, not when the booth bimbos hit the floor.

    And that would be an improvement.

  74. Re:One baggy could kill everyone reading this, eas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    One thing that scares me is influenza and similar viral diseases. Debilitating, fast spreading, deadly even in some natural forms, rapidly mutating...and the biggest factor for a military or paramilitary group is the ease of vaccination against a specific strain.

    Develop a modified strain with a high mortality rate, release it in an area...after a few days or weeks send in your vaccinated troops and they mop up while it burns itself out.

  75. Can you say "oversold"? by jcr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Attending COMDEX would be one of the things I look forward to most in my computing career.

    Forget COMDEX. It's been a complete waste of space since at least the mid-80's. How many disk vendor and MicroSquish MSCE body shop trade show booths do you need to see?

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  76. WAAAAAA! by simetra · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Suck up and deal, cry-baby.

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
  77. Bad Thoughts from Last Year by XBL · · Score: 1

    I went to Comdex 2000 in Las Vegas, and got into the Bill Gates keynote. It was in MGM Grand (a huge place). There were several rooms setup with TVs for people who didn't get tickets fast enough to see it in person.

    Well anyway, I got a ticket and seen Bill Gates in person from a moderate distance. For some reason I had the sick thought of how easy it would have been for me to bring a gun in there and take aim at Bill.

    I'm sure there are a lot of psychos out there who would love to shoot the richest man in the world. I'm glad it's not me.

  78. What? Noooo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I can't carry a bag, how can I bring my laptop? That's where my Passport is, after all. Good old Passport and good (not so old ) XP. It's so stable it doesn't even crash when it sends your porn collection to the FBI.

  79. Re:Blow up? I think this is about anthrax or so... by coli2 · · Score: 1

    Ebola my friend.... Fight the future before its too late...

  80. Key 3 media need to rethink this by Xunker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I got the letter about this with my pre-registration badge yesterday, and I was only slightly annoyed about this, and I realize they have their reasons.

    However.

    It says that no exeptions to this rule will be made, period -- this is where it sucks because I'm going with my girlfriend (a computer geek too) and this policy will impact her. She has to use forearm crutches which kind of monopolize the use of her hands so she can't carry anything except by using a knapsack slung on her shoulder. Are they going to fuck over an entire group of people over this?

    And to all those who are just going to say "you should carry her stuff for her" or "get a wheelchair", you can save it -- it's the principle of the thing that counts here.

    --
    Hilary Rosen's speech was about her love of money and her desire to roll around naked in a pile of money.
    1. Re:Key 3 media need to rethink this by kindbud · · Score: 2

      And to all those who are just going to say "you should carry her stuff for her" or "get a wheelchair", you can save it -- it's the principle of the thing that counts here. --

      Um, no - actually the principle doesn't count anymore. Everybody says we're at war. That means the principle doesn't count, only action counts. Especially action that just sends a message, without actually doing anything that counts. Haven't you figured out how this all works yet? Come on, get with the program. There's an economy at stake here.

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    2. Re:Key 3 media need to rethink this by CaptCosmic · · Score: 1

      If they want to give her grief about the napsack, just mention the American's With Disabilites Act. That is still law in the United States, and you can sue them over it.

      --
      -> Capt Cosmic <-
    3. Re:Key 3 media need to rethink this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just file a court injunction now and save the hassle.

    4. Re:Key 3 media need to rethink this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > And to all those who are just going to say "you should carry her stuff for her" or "get a wheelchair", you can save it -- it's the principle of the thing that counts here.

      How about the principle that carrying her bag would be the courteous thing to do, especially in her circumstances?

      Oh, I get it - only your principles matter.

    5. Re:Key 3 media need to rethink this by prizog · · Score: 1

      So, xunker has to be with her at all times? What about in the bathroom? What if she wants to look at GNU/Linux booths and xunker wants to look at OpenBSD booths?

      Sure, he's probably offered, but that's not a solution to the real problem, which is that this person has a disability and should be accomodated.

      Do you think that places shouldn't install wheelchair ramps because it would be courteous if people lifted chairs up steps? Sure it would, but ramps allow disabled people greater independence and dignity.

  81. Laptops in hotel rooms? by Skapare · · Score: 2
    They want you to leave your laptop in your hotel room, too!

    Woohoo! Free laptops!

    Seriously, the hotel room is THE WORST place to leave valuables, when you are not there. While most hotel cleaning staff are very honest people, the low wages do tend to push a lot of people over the edge into crime. Many of my friends have been victims of this.

    This tells me the policy makers for Comdex are idiots.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    1. Re:Laptops in hotel rooms? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      Every hotel has a safe, either in the room or at the reception. Carrying all your valuables on your body all the time is hardly safe, convenient or sensible anyway. And if something does disappear from your room, the staff with access know they're the first suspects.

    2. Re:Laptops in hotel rooms? by loraksus · · Score: 2

      The Disney Pacific Hotel uses (or used, this was 2 or 3 years ago) magnetic striped cards as door access. I accidentally (wrong floor, slightly drunk. OK, more than slightly) walked into a room. 2 asian businessmen, 2 laptops, portable printers, one of those super nice japanese video camers, a hooker (well, maybe not, but it was kinda suspicious, she wasn't wearing much, neither were they) etc.
      Next day, tried about 50 rooms, got green lights on 12 of them.
      I haven't stayed at a hotel that used magnetic card locks since. Realistically, how hard is it to get a maid's master key....

      Personally, I'd think that the policy makers are not idiots, but a bunch of assholes who snort too much fucking cocaine, but whatever.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  82. Put it this way... by Malic · · Score: 1

    ...why go to COMDEX in the first place? I went 1997 and it was really was a waste of time. Most of the people at the tables didn't know anything more than what you could find on their website.

    And sometimes the info on the web was more up-to-date (it takes time to print up all that stuff - the web has no such hang ups).

    Don't get upset. And don't go.

    --
    I swear by MacOS X. Although I use to swear *at* MacOS 9...
  83. Plenty of reasons to worry about security by Uatu · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't see why they would think that a Comdex show would be targeted.

    They're expecting "only" 150,000 people (From a max. of 250,000 back in 1997) because of the dot-com bust , the not-yet-named recession, the Sept. 11 attacks and all the stuff from that (companies prohibiting certain key execs from traveling, cost-cutting measures, etc.)

    Now, seeing all that people in one place, you can't imagine it. Back in the 1997 show, I was warned before attending, but being there, it's another thing.

    We "planed" to get a taxi when the show closed one of the days, well, the line was 1000+ long. Don't believe it ? I've a picture from last year's show.

    The lines for the 24+ different bus routes to the hotels ? 400 + long each.

    In a few words, it's BIG. Many people. Chaos could ensue. And you can count on the people attending the show to help. Two or three years ago, all the cell phone lines/bandwidth was used at some peak hours, something that never happenned before, if you believe the local news those days. Remember some of the "chaos" in NYC when the cell lines got blocked after the attacks? well, it kind of happened in Las Vegas. Scary indeed.

    You could see the people from Japan, Korea, Taiwan, etc. using their cell phones (2 or 3 models more advanced than anyone I saw in the US, BTW) at some "strange hours", I suppose they called before the offices back at home closed or just when they were opening, I don't know. But seeing all those people seating on the stairs talking in different languages, it's when it hits you: Comdex Fall is an International show. Just from here (Mexico), I don't remember the "exact" figure but it's above 12,000 people attending. Another example: I remember in the 98 show being at the Ziff Davis booth, there was an egyptian engineer trying to subscribe to some magazines. "Big deal", eh? He wasn't an immigrant working in the USA. Then the ZD representative realized he wanted to get it to get delivered to Egypt. I mean, this man came all the way from Egypt! Not as a part of a booth, but as any "regular techie". Talk about getting some job related travels (I mean, for techies, not CEO's...)

    You can see companies from all around the world, press from all around the world, reporting daily from there. I remember seeing a CNN press booth just in the middle of the Convention Center last year. So you have coverage all around the world.

    And don't get me started on the crowds in the rest of the strip. The buffet lines are the second worst of the year, only after the last week of the year, one of the busiest at LV. Crowds everywhere but at the casino's. Someone said the tech people are the worst crowd as gamblers, suppossedly because "we" know the odds on the chance games. I support the other theory: bad travel budgets makes us "cheap". :D

    Also, Las Vegas had a anthrax scare some years ago when they arrested someone with an anthrax vaccine, after getting a clue from someone about it. They reacted very seriously back then, imagine now.

    You also have some of the richest people in the world there. Gates, Ellison, Sony's President (or CEO? I don't remember).

    I mean *HONESTLY*, who on earth would target COMDEX, something that has absolutely no importance to the general (non-technical) public? From a terrorist's point of view (which is what you try to take if your aim is an intelligent security policy) it's obviously of no use to attack a target that people would have to explain why it was that striking it meant something.


    How about one of the biggest/important economy sectors? And in this "decadent, Sin City" ?

    I think I already made my point. So you can't go around thinking it can't be a target. I'm sure I wish it wasn't true, but it is. I love that show, I was there 3 of the last 4 years, and yes, it's not the same as the "good all days". Yes, you can get most of the info from the internet just days after, but the "experience" is different.

    Sadly, I cann't attend this year, since my VISA expired and here the embassy/consulates have a backlog/queue of 120,000+ applications/renewals to see (so I'll get my renewal until next year. Bummer). And that's before the attacks happenned, not because of any increased security. Just too much work and too many people, I guess.

    I hope this doesn't get's the show killed, I hope it gets to thrives again next year.

    After reading some of the sites with advice for attending there (incredible useful, BTW) and having the experience of attending the ComicCon at San Diego before, I always had a backpack with me, with a bottle of water, a digital camera (even a video one once), extra batteries for the cams, some extra business cards, etcetera. I could stuff there the "goodies" as someone mentioned before and when it was full, I could rely then in the show's bags. I guess if I was going there this year I had to "rethink" my strategy. It's a shame cameras can't be used anymore.

    Someone mentioned the body search thing. It can't be done to everyone. The lines/crowd for entering would be unmanageable. Metal detector should be used, but that can't get the anthrax/biological weapons as someone mentioned. I guess you just have to rely on checking everyones pockets, I guess, like at the stadium. God, I hope there's nothing like that. And you can bet I will go there next year.

    Whatever you do, don't be Irish .. (no wait that should read from anywhere from Morroco to the Phillipines, or even be Greek) and be in the wrong place at the wrong time until sanity prevails.

    Funny thing, last year a friend went with us "regulars" to Comdex (Nov/2000), and from the point we arrived at the airport there were always "suspicious" looks for him. he has a mexican name, but his great-great-great-great-grandfather or something was from the Middle East, and he has "the looks", with a heavy beard and ponytail. But he's more mexican than the tequila. We talked about it when we came back. Guess what he's not doing after the Sept.11 attacks ? You guessed right. Not going "even near" the border. And I can't blame him, I saw it happenning before, so why risk it? I guess that egyptian engineer I saw before will not go there neither.

    Just my 2 cents.

    And see you there next year.

    BTW, for the guy who is in high school and heared all this things? Go for it, I too wanted to attend three conventions when I was in college: MacWorld, San Diego ComicCon, Comdex Fall (2 out of 3 ain't bad, and MacWorld sucked when I got the chance. And now I don't use Mac anymore, so I'm not going there yet.). You have to make it happen.

  84. We deeply need increased security at COMDEX... by Djere · · Score: 1

    Yes. Because the terrorists have always been out to get COMDEX. COMDEX is, of course, a major political target, having a deep spiritual significance to the American people, as well as a strong influence on the flow of U.S. policy.

    So you see, this is -clearly- for our safety. Duh.

  85. stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like someone couldn't still carry in a pouch of magic dust. The terrorists have already won. Let's just nuke the entire fucking world and get it over with.

  86. Someone else read the same book as I did... by CokeBear · · Score: 2

    Many years ago, I read a book, the title of which I have forgotten. Basically, the terrorists in the novel use large gatherings (including a MacWorld Expo) to spread a bioagent, that has a delayed reaction of serveral days (weeks?). Everyone flys home, and later, massive outbreaks all over the USA that nobody knows where it started. (Anyone remember the title? I would be eternally grateful)

    --
    Reality has a liberal bias
    1. Re:Someone else read the same book as I did... by crivens · · Score: 1

      I can think of a Tom Clancy novel, but I can't remember the title.

    2. Re:Someone else read the same book as I did... by psamuels · · Score: 2, Informative
      (Anyone remember the title?)

      Executive Orders, by Tom Clancy. I'm sure the plot has been used by others, but that one fits your description. The agent in question was a strain of Ebola which incubated for a few days.

      As usual in Clancy, something goes wrong (the virus is not as contagious as the Persians had hoped) so disaster was averted by chance - there were "only" a few thousand victims.

      --
      "How can you claim that you are anti-crack, while still writing a window manager?" — Metacity README
    3. Re:Someone else read the same book as I did... by shogun · · Score: 1

      Yes it was the Tom Clancy novel Executive Orders. In it the terrorists used the trade shows to spread a particularily nasty airborne variant of Ebola.

    4. Re:Someone else read the same book as I did... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was called This Is Your Life, CokeBear.

    5. Re:Someone else read the same book as I did... by CaptCosmic · · Score: 1

      I believe you're refering to Tom Clancy's The Sum Of All Fears.

      --
      -> Capt Cosmic <-
    6. Re:Someone else read the same book as I did... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      Nope, it's Executive Orders. The follow on, Rainbox Six, comingled with the game of the same name, follows an american biotech firm, headed by a radical envrionmentalist, fortifying the Ebola virus and attempting much the same thing. Sum of All Fears is the one where the terrorists find the missing Isreali nuke, build a bomb, and plant it at, I think the SuperBowl, but some large football game.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  87. Comdex Shmomdex by dTd · · Score: 1

    Terrorism has won. Obviously the very name "terrorism" means instilling terror. The comdex promoters must be pretty terrified. I say just don't go. The highjackers took over the planes with box cutters not bombs. I suppose that none of the vendors are allowed to have box cutters? I sure hope so as I might become terrified if I saw one. How about butane lighters? With a amll amount of effort these can be made into a substantial explosive, or shoe laces could be use to strangle someone "All Soes Must Tie With Velcro" This reactionism is getting out of hand.

    --
    /dTd
  88. Items banned from University of Michigan stadium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Marshmellows. Yup. Banned'em about 5 years ago at football games. Kids were throwing them.

    Good thing you can still bring a pint in and pour it into your cider.

  89. Re:Blow up? I think this is about anthrax or so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nah, Ebola is a huge pain in the ass to spread. It can't be transmitted by air, and the only reasonable way to get it is through bodily fluids (which victims leak in spades). Unless yer having sex with everyone at the conference, even a suicidal terrorist couldn't spread it.

  90. Bring a purse or fanny pack! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It says you can bring a purse or fanny pack. Why not just borrow a purse your wife no longer uses, and carry your crap in it? Sure, people will look at you funny, but it'll be big enough to hold a Sony Picturebook.

  91. Quite radical... by joshjs · · Score: 1

    But they haven't announced that they're planning to strip search people ... yet.


    Cross your fingers!

  92. COMDEX SHOMDEX by PRickard · · Score: 2

    COMDEX security? Who has time or money to go to COMDEX in this economy? Useless exercises like that geek pornofest are the first to go when budgets get tight. I don't have time to worry about COMDEX, I'm too busy looking for a way to make money that doesn't break the law or involve mops and fast food.

    --

    == Paul Rickard, Editor of The Microsoft Boycott Campaign ====

  93. Checked my letter... by VivianC · · Score: 2

    Backpacks and Laptops will not be allowed. But no mention of restricting conceled handguns if you have a recognized permit. Guess I feel safer.

    --
    Viv

    Gmail invites for ip
  94. Photo ID by askwar · · Score: 1

    > CARRY A PHOTO ID (DRIVER'S LICENSE OR PASSPORT) ON YOU AT ALL TIMES

    Uhm, so? What's that screaming about? Isn't having (and thus carrying around) a photo ID completely normal? Well, here it is!?

    I don't get it - what are you worrying about?

    --
    Alexander Skwar -- Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.iso-top.de iso-top.de - Die
  95. Re:Stops 802.11 Hax0rz :-) by jmauro · · Score: 2

    An Ipaq can do the 802.11 scanning just as well as a laptop. And with a duel-sleave with one network card and a microdrive a lot of information can be pulled down in a more descrete manner.

  96. Billy boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soon enough the only person on the floor who will be allowed to have anything electronic will be Bill Gates. I can't wait!!! Also, they would probably require that all participants bring a laptop to the door for proper microsoft compliance inspection (e.g. unless you run a completely unstable OS, they will confiscate it.)

  97. I love america!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No seriously, really I do!!! And I mean that because comdex is in vegas, which is to say in Nevada, and NV, bless their western hearts, is one of the 28 states w/ legal concealed carry for everyone, ie. you and me. Ergo, NV, avec their shall-issue carry laws have successfully created a legal provision wherein I shall not be able to bring my thinkpad, but must instead, as a patriotic american, tote either my Firestar .40 pistol or my ever reliable Rossi .38 five shot avec +p hollowpoints!!!

  98. Face it, the terrorists have won by hayden · · Score: 1

    They have you scared to go out. Scared to open your mail. Willing to give away every one of the rights that you American so loudly tell us (the rest of the world) about at every opertunity.

    For what? To quote Tyler Durdin, "The illusion of safety", nothing more. Seen Swordfish? Do you really think these security measures would prevent somebody walking in with a significant amount of C4 strapped to their body? Do you think it would stop a dozen people doing it? And to think horrible, terrorist assiting devices such as watches (for timing) aren't on the list of banned equipment! What an outrage!

    Unfortunatly I'm probably preaching to the converted here. The masses of stupid people who think these measures are necessary and A Good Think probably don't read /. *sigh*

    --
    Nerd: Derogatory term typically directed at anybody with a lower Slashdot ID than you.
    1. Re:Face it, the terrorists have won by underpaidISPtech · · Score: 2

      On the contrary, blind patriotism and an Amero-centric world-view run deep, even among the /. elite. ;p

      And yes, the terrorists have won. The result being the same as that of a person who fires their weapon blindly at an unseen enemy.

  99. Next Step... by terras · · Score: 1

    You'll only be allowed to wear vendor supplied t-shirts and hats.

    Seriously... Everyone has to accept a little risk, or why bother getting out of bed in the morning/evening/whenever?

  100. Re:Blow up? I think this is about anthrax or so... by GMontag451 · · Score: 1

    Plus the fact that people with ebola die too quickly to be effective vectors for the epidemic. To be really effective, you would need a disease that is as deadly as ebola, as virulent as influenza, and has a relatively long incubation period (2 weeks or so.) That would be really scary.

  101. It the turnout was like Chicago Comdex... by thogard · · Score: 1

    They could have the security guard follow everyone around.

    Comdex in Chicago was empty. There was more going on at tradeshows in Australia. On exhibitor told me they had to move their stand 5 times because there where so many cancelations.

  102. What the fuck are you talking about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Nope. I will carry a bag with me and be secure in its contents wherever I goddamn please

    Yeah, the police patrolling comdex will be scared shitless of you, muscles bursting from your shirt, bravado that says "do ya feel lucky?"

    More likely you're the guy who never leaves his hotel room because you just discovered pay-per-view porn and is desperately trying to get his rocks off in the first fifteen seconds before the billing kicks in.

    1. Re:What the fuck are you talking about? by veddermatic · · Score: 2
      huh?


      Did you read past the first line of that post? I didn't think so.


      No wonder COMDEX is gonna be a shit-fest this year.... there are mornons like you in the world.

      --
      Department of Homeland Security: Removing the rights real patriots fought and died for since 2001
  103. No big surprise... by seebs · · Score: 2

    Comdex spent two or three years spamming me after I told them repeatedly not to. Why would you think they exist in a world where the word "privacy" is used in any way?

    --
    My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
  104. Security at Computing Conventions by furchin · · Score: 1

    Sounds like comdex is doing the same thing that MS' DevDays conferences are doing with security. From an email I got:

    Dear DevDays 2001 Registrant,

    Microsoft DevDays 2001 is coming up and we're excited you'll be joining us!

    In these unique new times, we are asking a few things of you to help ensure everyone's safety at DevDays:

    - Bring at least one form of picture identification. Please be advised that you will need valid picture identification to be admitted to DevDays this year.

    - Wristbands will be placed for you. Wristbands for admitted attendance will be placed on your wrists for you, instead of being provided to you to place yourself.

    - Do not bring bags, backpacks, cameras or bottles to the event. Any items brought onsite will be subject to search.

    -Come EARLY to register. Although we will make every effort to check attendees in as quickly as possible, because we will be checking IDs and placing wristbands, registration check-in may take quite a bit longer than usual. Registration opens at all cities promptly at 7 AM. We recommend coming early to avoid a long registration line.

    We thank you in advance for your cooperation and understanding in this matter. In addition to your enjoyment of the DevDays 2001 content, we want you to be aware the safety of our attendees is also top of mind.

    Thank you and enjoy the event!

    Sincerely,

    The DevDays 2001 Event Team

    I think that DevDays, as well as comdex, are showing off their egos thinking that they're a terrorist target. Comdex, okay, maybe. Devdays? I fail to see how someone putting on a wristband me rather than allowing me to do it myself will stop anyone.

  105. my poor country by samantha · · Score: 2

    This is ridiculous. One major terrorist incident and a smattering of anthrax scares and we start acting like chickens with our heads cut off. Personally I am more than willing to be a little less secure and a lot more free. At the rate we are going the techno-revolution will be still-born out of fear of terrorism. What a waste.

  106. FYI by Traa · · Score: 1

    They are not actually banning laptops...just the bags/cases that laptops typically come in. So go ahead bring your bare laptop and sit in the back of the room and play minesweeper while the rest of us pay attention to the talks.

  107. What Comdex sent me.... by WimBo · · Score: 1
    OFFICIAL STATEMENT: SAFETY AND SECURITY POLICIES AT COMDEX FALL 2001 IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU READ AND FOLLOW THESE PROCEDURES

    In the wake of the tragic events that have been affecting our country since September 11,
    Key3Media Events is taking requisite security precautions with respect to its events. For
    COMDEX Fall 2001, Key3Media is working with the City of Las Vegas, applicable event
    venues, local authorities and a private security firm to ensure that appropriate safety
    measures are taken for the event.

    This year at COMDEX Fall, expect to see more security. Security officers will be roving the
    conferences and marketplace floor. Las Vegas has historically been one of the safest cities
    in America, with extensive security through the hotels and casinos. Those hotels and
    conference centers are escalating security even further.

    We are working to make these changes with minimal impact on your COMDEX Fall 2001
    experience. However, there are some security policies that are being instituted at COMDEX
    Fall that you need to be aware of:

    Policy to access the entire Las Vegas Convention Center property, including the
    Las Vegas Hilton and Silver Lot tented areas:

    * While on-site, you should CARRY A PHOTO ID (DRIVER'S LICENSE OR PASSPORT)
    ON YOU AT ALL TIMES.

    * To obtain your badge and/or badge holder, YOU MUST PRESENT YOUR PHOTO ID
    (driver's license or passport). Each registered attendee will be allowed to pick up their
    own badge only - not for friends, colleagues, etc. NO EXCEPTIONS.

    * NO BAGS OF ANY KIND WILL BE ALLOWED ON THE SHOW FLOOR.

    * Please leave bags, briefcases, backpacks, laptops, etc. at home or in your hotel room.
    Please remember that once inside the exhibit halls, you can carry the product literature you
    collect in one of the many plastic bags that exhibitors distribute to attendees.

    NO BAGS WILL BE CHECKED AT THE CONVENTION CENTER.
    THERE IS NO PLACE FOR THEM AND THEY WILL NOT BE STORED.

    * Please expect delays and allow extra time when arriving on-site. If you have meetings,
    appointments, or conference sessions to attend, please arrive as early as possible. It may
    take longer than usual to enter the property this year due to increased security measures.

    Policy for attending the Keynote Presentations:

    * NO BAGS OF ANY KIND will be allowed in any of the keynote programs. This includes
    backpacks, laptop bags, shopping bags, briefcases, etc. NO CAMERAS will be allowed.

    NO BAGS WILL BE CHECKED AT THE MGM OR THE HILTON.
    THERE IS NO PLACE FOR THEM AND THEY WILL NOT BE STORED
    .

    * Ticketing For the Bill Gates Keynote, Sunday, November 11 at the MGM Grand Garden Arena:
    Each registered attendee will be allowed one ticket for admission to the keynote. Your COMDEX
    Fall 2001 badge MUST be presented to obtain your ticket. You may pickup a ticket for yourself
    only-not for friends, colleagues, etc. To obtain your badge and/or badge holder at the MGM, you
    MUST present your photo ID (driver's license or passport). NO exceptions.

    For General Attendee Tickets: Tickets to the Bill Gates Keynote will be distributed to registered
    attendees in Level I - Registration Area of the MGM Grand Conference Center beginning Sunday,
    November 11th at 8:00 a.m. To receive a ticket you will need to present your official COMDEX Fall
    2001 Badge and Badgeholder, along with a photo ID.

    For Media/Analyst Tickets: Tickets to the Bill Gates Keynote will be distributed to accredited Media
    and Analysts at the Media/Analyst Preview in the MGM Grand Conference Center Room 309/310 on
    Sunday, November 11th at 4:00 p.m. To receive a ticket you will need to present your official
    COMDEX Fall 2001 Media or Analyst Badge and Badgeholder, along with a photo ID.

    * Ticketing For the Keynotes at the Las Vegas Hilton: For entry to the keynotes, you must present your
    COMDEX Fall 2001badge and badge holder. Lines will queue in the foyer just outside the Conrad/Barron
    Room within the Las Vegas Hilton.

    Key3Media reserves the right to take any security measures it deems appropriate to increase the safety
    of our exhibitors and attendees, without prior notice. Key3Media reserves the right to change the policies
    set forth herein, without prior notice, in its sole discretion.

    The Federal Aviation Administration has released a new travel advisory for passengers. Please visit
    www.faa.gov so that you can prepare yourself to travel safely. Increased security measures are being
    taken at bus and train stations as well.

    We thank you in advance for your cooperation and hope you enjoy the show.

    COMDEX Fall 2001 Show Management

  108. so the funding provided by the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that Israel uses to kill their people doesn't count?
    how do you know they haven't suffered personally?
    how many people knew someone in the WTC?
    how many Afghanistans have lost family members or friends in the fighting with Israel?

    I'm not saying it justifies anything, but trying to make out there was absolutely no provocation is absolutely untrue, and most people outside the US are aware of that.

    You assume they are jealous of your "superpower", but they just think you are arseholes.

    1. Re:so the funding provided by the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was absolutely no provocation for these acts.

      If it were up to me, I would nuke them. Put them out of their misery.

  109. Hysteria by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People aren't terrified; people are hysterical. They're not really scared, they just feel like they have to do something.

    People are thinking "some guy could walk in here carrying some disease and kill everyone". Yes, he could. And "someone could plant a bomb here and blow us all up". Yes, that's possible. Or "maybe some crazy terrorist has nuclear weapons and he's going to blow up planet Earth". Yep, could very well be. That's always been possible (to a degree) and that always will be possible (more so with each day that passes).

    Doesn't mean it's any more likely today than it was yesterday or 30 years ago.

    The attacks on the WTC and Pentagon were not based on madness or religion. They were not attempts to kill a lot of people. There are much better ways of doing that. They were political acts, against symbols of the USA's military and economic rule. Even the airline names were carefully picked. And although of course I don't approve of them, I can understand them. It seems that most americans can't.

    Some time ago there was a war in Somalia. People were killing each other with knives, stones, machetes, etc. Sometimes with their bare hands. Someone asked an observer if that meant this was a particularly violent conflict. He said no, it just meant they had run out of bullets.

    Using airplanes full of people to blow up buildings is no more "cruel" or "barbaric" than using a cruise missile. Certainly no more cowardly. But some people (most people) just don't have cruise missiles. And some people (most people), when left with nothing to lose, will not mind losing what they have, especially if losing something so worthless (their life) can have such a big impact.

    The way to avoid being blown up or infected or assassinated is not to isolate yourself and shoot everyone that comes too near. The way to avoid being struck by your enemies is to have no enemies.

    The strikes on the WTC carried a message: "you are not out of range; if we really want to hit you, we can." I've known that all my life (possibly because I live in Europe and we've had a few thousand years of history and wars and revolutions and all that sort of stuff); most americans seem to have discovered it in the last two months. And they think they have to do something about it, because they can't stand the thought of being vulnerable; of not being untouchable. Today on the BBC I saw this american congressman (or maybe he was a general) saying "We have to bomb Afghanistan because we have to do something and we can't think of anything else to do". The only problem is, it's not accomplishing anything (apart from killing people that don't even know what's going on, making more enemies and worsening the USA's image worldwide).

    And this brings me back to the silly security measures and to the way this hysteria is being used to limit people's freedom. If the only thing you can think of doing has no practical effect, then don't do it. Think of something else, or don't do anything. If someone really wants to strike, they will always be able to strike. I don't know if these "security measures" are a deliberate attempt to take away people's freedom and give more powers to the state or if they're just good-natured (but misguided) attempts to keep people "safe". Either way people should stand up for their rights and refuse to have their freedom taken away. It's not that "the terrorists win", it's just that people lose. Someone said that a nation that can't balance security and freedom doesn't deserve either.

    I'm not a religious person; I don't believe there's life after death. But I still consider my freedom more valuable than my life.

    1. Re:Hysteria by underpaidISPtech · · Score: 2

      That was really good. Probably one of the most rounded, sober commentaries on this subject since the attacks.

      Now if only there was a way to get Bush and Friends out of Afghanistan. Or at least drop inflatable ready-made© schools and hospitals instead of bombs ;)

      I've said it before (and was lambasted, guess it was too soon after 9/11), this is not a war. It is not self-defense. If I was to attack a person on the street and fuck 'em up real good, and then they came after me a day later with all their buddies, it's vigilantism or revenge. That's the same "we've been wronged" mentality that proved fertile ground for Nazism, post-WWI. No, two wrongs do not make a right.

      A world body such as the UN should be allowed to go in and do the Taliban-busting, to sort out the human rights abuses, and protect the status of women; while the U.S. and it's Western lackeys ( of which I am the biggest - Canada) can hold tribunals and world court to jail that twisted Bin Laden fellow.

    2. Re:Hysteria by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2
      and then they came after me a day later with all their buddies, it's vigilantism or revenge.
      See, this is where I disagree. It's vigilantism only if there's a body of law to cover it, and you're acting outside that body of law. What are the international/UN laws on state-sponsered, or possibly state-condoned, terrorism? As to revenge, no. Deterrance. Take a look at the animal world. An animal won't attack another of his own species for fun, or for a cheap thrill. An animal attacks another to defend something. Period. Dominance struggles rarely make it even to the RITUAL combat stage, let alone full blown combat. Humans are unique in that regard. If you fuck somebody up in the street, and there's no consequences, you just might decide to do it again. And again. And again. If America doesn't respond forcefully to this attack, they'll suffer more. The problem is that if they DO respond forcefully, they'll suffer more, but for different reasons.
      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    3. Re:Hysteria by mpe · · Score: 2

      And this brings me back to the silly security measures and to the way this hysteria is being used to limit people's freedom. If the only thing you can think of doing has no practical effect, then don't do it. Think of something else, or don't do anything.

      Worst these measures may well introduce their own security holes.

    4. Re:Hysteria by bluebomber · · Score: 2

      Not that I disagree with most of what you say, and this really wasn't your point, but:

      The way to avoid being struck by your enemies is to have no enemies.

      Show me a man with no enemies, and I'll show you a man who never did anything worthwhile. If you're not pissing someone off, you're not doing anything...

    5. Re:Hysteria by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > Now if only there was a way to get Bush and Friends out of Afghanistan. Or at least drop inflatable ready-made schools and hospitals instead of bombs ;)

      Are you nuts? You think the Taliban are pissed with us now, wait'll you see how pissed off they get when their women learn to read.

    6. Re:Hysteria by Mike1024 · · Score: 1

      Hey,

      Or "maybe some crazy terrorist has nuclear weapons and he's going to blow up planet Earth". Yep, could very well be.

      Actually, I plan to steal a Nuclear Bomb from NATO and demand a ransom of ONE MILLION DOLLARS or I will destroy a major american city.

      BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!

      -M

      --
      "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
    7. Re:Hysteria by grammar+fascist · · Score: 2

      The way to avoid being struck by your enemies is to have no enemies.

      I'm sure the Bush Administration would be more than happy to entertain your thoughts on how to accomplish that. Why don't you give them a call and tell them all of your wonderful ideas?

      "Let's have no enemies!" Great! How?

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    8. Re:Hysteria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using nuclear weapons on your enemies is another way to have no enemies. The non-existence of several middle-eastern regimes/nations can be arranged in as little as one day, if push comes to shove.

    9. Re:Hysteria by glapalom · · Score: 1

      Wow! That's so insightful. Man you got it all figured out. It's so easy to tell people what not to do after it's done isn't it? "Just don't make enemies." Your intelligence is just oozing out all over the place. OK, since you're so smart, how about you give advice on what to do now that we ALREADY have enemies? Geez, you philosiphers and your drabble about a perfect world crack me up! You tell us to "Think of something else." That is so easy. Why don't you shut your pie hole until you have practical solutions about current issues. That's right solutions. Those things real men are willing to offer and accept responsibility for. I would much rather lighten the load on the security people at this tradeshow at the expense of my reputation to a few whiny-butt little complainers posting stupid flames on a forum. That's called making a decision and accepting accountability. Something apparently, you wouldn't know much about. Let's say they don't put any restrictions on the show, and then a bunch of people get killed. You'll watch the news for a few days and then have a whole butt-load of insight for us on what SHOULD have been done won't you!?

      --
      Joshua 24:15
  110. This page was brought to you by Bouncey Bubble(TM) by xixax · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Over here, there was some attempt to ban patrons bringing in drinks not supplied by the sponsor of a major sporting event. Things like water.
    More recently, I was stripped of my water bottle at a major outdoor music festival ostensibly because it may have been alcohol and was forced to buy water at extortionate rates.

    Xix.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
  111. LinuxWorld has already banned cameras by Adam+J.+Richter · · Score: 2

    Comdex is not the first major computer trade show to ban cameras. At LinuxWorld in San Francisco in August(?), I watched a show staff member enforce it against some random attendee.

    Personally, I think a ban on cameras at a trade show gives the impression of an industry trying to avoid accountability to its would-be buyers. I would much prefer exhibiting at trade shows that allow cameras.

  112. OT: definately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen definitely misspelled so often on /. that I wonder whether the official spelling should be changed.

    Sorry, couldn't resist.

  113. Sleepers by blahnana · · Score: 1

    Surely this sort of thing isn't really going to affect the determined terrorist from getting in anyway. Sure, you stop them from getting their bombs in that way, but what about all the goods that are travelling in and out anyway?

    And what about the sleepers. The people that have been in America for the past couple of years living their lives... what if they get a job doing janitorial work, and they bring their bombs in beforehand?

    And most importantly, if I'm a terrorist or group of terrorists willing to die, you think a fricking security guard is going to stop me at the gate? You think a security guard is going to take one for the team if I stroll up to him with a few kilos of plastic explosive and a deadman's switch in my hand? I guarantee you that if I say to him... "Start running now" and give him a glimpse, he's not going to stop me. And even if he tries, he dies, and maybe I take out some load bearing pillars as well.

    Nope, this sort of thing isn't that useful. Maybe it makes people _feel_ a bit safer... but you sure as hell _aren't_ safer from a determined person who puts their life secondary to taking you out.

    Nope, whatever the solution is, it isn't this. This serves other causes, and I think the people who impose these sorts of rules know it. I'm not adressing the whole "conspiracy to remove privacy" bit here, but I think a previous post says it quite well... they're using this as an excuse. Which is kinda sad, really.

    And who, in the end, gets to be free here?

    1. Re:Sleepers by underpaidISPtech · · Score: 2

      Yeah, the hysteria around the "T" word is now a license to push personal agendas, and distract our attention. Alot of these inconveniences are small and insignificant ( I can't take a knapsack into most places already ) but it is the pattern of behaviour this instills that is important.

      The propaganda machine doesn't roll on, it rolls over

    2. Re:Sleepers by mpe · · Score: 2

      And what about the sleepers. The people that have been in America for the past couple of years living their lives... what if they get a job doing janitorial work, and they bring their bombs in beforehand?

      Or for that matter find out how security guards dress...

  114. Re:Blow up? I think this is about anthrax or so... by aibrahim · · Score: 2

    Uhhh...there are in fact airborne strains of Ebola.

    In fact Ebola Reston was airborne. For those who don't know Ebola was just outside Washington D.C. in an airborne strain.

    Lucky that Ebola Reston appears incapable of infecting humans

    --

    Don't post innacurate information
    If you do, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you.
  115. It used to be a great orgy, too by Wee · · Score: 4, Funny
    It's not really all that much more than a giant marketing orgy

    I used to love COMDEX. I worked for a large Fortune 500 company, and I would always lie about how many purchasing decisions/budgets I had influence over. Everyone thought I was crazy and asking for new spam, but they didn't know about procmail. They were only marketing guys, after all. But when the other marketing guys who were aiming to market at me saw my membership stuff, I could weasel my way into plenty of free stuff.

    The best meat-space schwag I ever got was getting into the last Digital party. Picture a huge hall, about 100 people, two bands, and about every possible type of food or drink you can imagine. And me and my brother in Chuck Taylors and t-shirts on a full-blown jag. I swear we were the only ones not in $5000 suits. It was very exclusive for some reason. The AMD party was packed. This place not so much. But they put on quite a show.

    They had these five girls in gold catsuits and black wigs marching around. Like five identical people. I can't remember if the Intel bunny suit guys were out then (I think this was 97, but I'm not sure), although I was reminded of them after thinking about it later. Anyway, the sales weenies would sic these women on the hardcases who were waffling on some high-pressure sales thing. The girls would grab these oddball Arab dudes (or whomever was on the hook) and parade them about for a couple minutes and them rub them around the room and back to their chair. I'm not sure what it was supposed to do, but it didn't work on me and my brother, since we would probably have only bought what wasn't exactly for sale. It was like being on a different planet. You talk them up enough and there's almost no limit to the free shit you'll get.

    My brother demanding that a Director of Sales something or other get him a "prime rib and a bottle of Chivas" or he would "start talking to Compaq and Intel" was particularly amusing. Especially since Digital was sold to Compaq not long after.

    And all I have to show for it now is an Alpha t-shirt which says "Feed the Need" on the front and has some probably long-dead proc on the back. Feed it indeed. Those were the days...

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

  116. Whoops, genus right.... by Neuticle · · Score: 1

    ...Species wrong. I somehow managed to mix it up between Anthrax bacilli (a descriptive term) and Bacillus Anthracis (the genus and species). My bad. point is, it's nasty, potent stuff, but not the worst out there when it comes to mass death. Back to studying.

    --
    "Cheeze it!" - Bender
  117. laptop theft by Barbarian · · Score: 3, Funny

    I bet there is a rash of laptop thievery from hotel's with lots of COMDEX attendees.

    1. Re:laptop theft by pibakic · · Score: 1

      Yah, cos I bet all of the thieves read /. and know that people aren't allowed to take their laptops into COMDEX. Pib.

      --
      "NEVER, EVER feed your computer beer" - some /.er
    2. Re:laptop theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      gg, retard.


      maybe what he meant is that they BANNED them because of a large case of laptop theft. not that because comdex is banning laptops on the floor, a lot of thieves who are tech-savvy are going to break into hotels and steak the laptops.


      shit you're dumb.

  118. Re:One baggy could kill everyone reading this, eas by btempleton · · Score: 2

    Smallpox isn't as scary as you sound because it is NOT infectious during almost all of the incubation period. So you go home, do nothing for 10 days, and then you start getting sick and infecting people.

    Immediately everybody who care into contact with you in the past day or so is vaccinated. Because we are looking the diseases is identified quickly. You are vaccinated too, which will help you, though not enough and you might die.

    The figures on smallpox show 30% mortality, but that is from long ago, with a population not nearly as healty as ours, without modern medicine. Hard to predict, but fortunately the mortality will probably be much lower. Not that any is good.

    --
    Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
  119. Re:Blow up? I think this is about anthrax or so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i dont think anthrax is anywhere near as much of a worry as smallpox in a hypothetical situation like the one you are suggesting. a suicide-bio-bomber not very different from the terrorists who are willing to give up their own lives on a regular basis in tel aviv crowds of tourists or on buses could very easily walk into COMDEX for example with nothing illegal on them at all, obeying all the rules, having proper id, no laptop, wearing a Penguin Computing shirt, and be carrying smallpox inside their own bodies without being stopped or prevented in any way by any of the strip searches or other security measures being suggested. the result would be a spreading of that biological suicide bombers disease to almost all the people at the event and it being spread to almost all the people that the victims know and almost all of the people that they in turn know, with it killing 30 percent of each wave of victims. there was a simulation by our own government in oklahoma city of a scenario like this which had less than pretty results...

    i realize we are all scared shitless by somethings, angry beyond belief about others, and grasping for answers for everything our grief and shock stricken minds can think of, but these security measures arent going to help us be safer in any way that outweighs the small but tangible freedom it takes away from us. i dont understand how we can fight terrorism by taking away our own freedom for them. i also dont understand how anyone thinks that these silly things being done at comdex are good ideas. there are much better things we can be doing and many things that we should be more upset about when they are taken away or just arent offered anymore... and yes that includes the free toys.

  120. Cables? How about silk ties by MrYotsuya · · Score: 1

    They can strangle people just as well.

  121. Re:Blow up? I think this is about anthrax or so... by nettdata · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Tom Clancy, Frank Herbert (the White Plague), and a whole bunch more have long had scenerios like this in their stories.

    Conferences are easy targets. People coming from all over the state/country/world meet in a single place, do stuff for a day or three, and then leave.

    During that day or three it is very easy to rig up some sort of aerosol-delivered "bad thing". That guy at the booth spraying the "air freshener" every 10-15 minutes, for instance.

    After the conference, people all fly back to their home and whaddayaknow, you've got stuff spreading all over the place.

    And what's in that air freshener?

    I think everyone's a little hyped up on the whole Anthrax thing, when there are a BUNCH more lethal, contageous, and readily accessbile critters out there; ebola, smallpox, the list goes on. Such critters are WAY easier to contract and spread.

    While I applaud everyone's attempt to make people FEEL better with these various public displays of "security tightening", I believe that a lot of these measures only comfort the "soccer Mom" types. Jack said it best with "the truth? you can't HANDLE the truth!"

    For instance, airport security here in Canada recently forced people to remove Poppies from their jackets because the little pin that held them on was "sharp and dangerous". Give me a fscking break!

    Meanwhile, I'm boarding the plane with a number of even MORE dangerous "weapons" that the security people are clueless about. How about pens and pencils? Quite effective at stabbing people. How about my car keys? One of the first things my girlfriend learned when she took a self-defense course was how to grip her keys and rake them over or stab them into a would-be attacker's eyes. How about that laptop security cable I carry to lock down my laptop? Nice little garrotte, never mind my belt, shoe laces, etc. How hard would it be to sneak in some wire under/inside a belt? I've seen a number of big-assed country style belts set off a metal detector and then be passed through with only a swipe of the hand-help detector. Who knows what's really inside or underneath it? How about my eye glasses? Pop out a lens and you've got some pretty sharp objects. Never mind some of the frames from Oakly and company these days... they can be considered weapons in and of themselves.

    And my personal pet peave; how does powering on a laptop prove that that is all that it is? The 60 year old lady at security making $6 an hour wouldn't know a functioning laptop if she saw it... a couple hundred bucks spent at Radio Shack would do well enough to fool her and even some somewhat "professional" or informed computer people. Besides, what's to say the entire laptop shell or case for that fully functional laptop isn't made of explosives? Talk about the ULTIMATE "blue screen of death".

    The answer? I think we just gotta stop being paranoid and get to know our neighbours better. How many apartment buildings have untis in them that are full of "conspirators" whose neighbours go out of their way to NOT get to know them or what they're doing?

    The best security force we could hope for right now is a bunch of nosy neighbours with lots of free time on their hands. :)

    --



    $0.02 (CDN)
  122. Re:Blow up? I think this is about anthrax or so... by evilandi · · Score: 2
    forsaken33: i'd be worrying about diseases, not just anthrax which is supposed to be not that communicable, but other disesases such as smallpox.

    Only in America... jeez, get some perspective.

    Greetings from the UK. Here, we have learned to deal with terrorism. Let me educate you on the top three tips for dealing with terrorism:

    1. Accept the risk

      You cannot prevent acts terrorism, but you can defeat the effects of terrorism; namely, terror.

      Live your life accepting risks proportionately. The chances of you being injured or killed by anthrax are tiny in proportion to other daily risks such as crossing the road. If you do not worry about larger risks such as crossing the road, there is no point in you worrying about smaller risks such as anthrax.

    2. Negotiate

      Terrorists are too small and secretive to be defeated by millitary force of any size. Diplomacy is the only option that has been proven to work.

    3. Publicise

      Terrorists rely on their network of supporters. If you publicise their acts of atrocity, you will weaken their support.

    --
    Andrew Oakley - www.aoakley.com
  123. All your bags... by jack+deadmeat · · Score: 1, Funny

    Are belong to

  124. Poke Poke, Look at the monkey jump! by mosch · · Score: 3, Informative
    This conversation is doing nothing more than make slashdroids look even dumber than they do normally.

    Firstly, there's no rule that says you must leave your laptop in your hotel room. The policy explicitly notes the existance of bag checks for those of you who think that there's a high likelihood of mass theft from casino hotels which are under extremely heavy surveillance.

    Secondly, this isn't a reduction of rights. Nowhere are you granted the "right" to bring your laptop to a privately sponsored convention. On the other hand, the convention organizers do have a legal responsibility to do their best to make sure everything is safe, and nobody engages in a terrorist attack, or more realistically that nobody steals those cute little LCD panels off a vendor booth, throws them in their laptop bag and walks out.

    Guys, I know the slashdroids love to overreact, but this is no big deal. Get over it.

    1. Re:Poke Poke, Look at the monkey jump! by Ulmo91 · · Score: 1

      Have you ever been to Comdex? It's a trade show attended by engineers and corporate executives. People are there to conduct business. Notebooks are required for software demos, last minute fixes/hacks, etc. Its just another useless gesture designed to make idiots feel safe. There are a myriad of ways to cause havoc and mayhem that banning notebooks doesn't even begin to address.

  125. Use the Force by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now it's time for all those who wrote "Jedi knight" in their census forms to practice their "This are not the bags you're looking for".

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
    1. Re:Use the Force by anomaly · · Score: 2

      Interesting .sig I've only seen that quote one other place. I'd like to know how you picked it.
      If you care to, please email me at tom_cooper at bigfoot dot com.

      --
      But Herr Heisenberg, how does the electron know when I'm looking?
    2. Re:Use the Force by sharkey · · Score: 2

      "This are not the bags you're looking for".

      Don't you mean, "All your base are belong to us"?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    3. Re:Use the Force by Fjord · · Score: 2

      Possibly it was one of 1500 web pages?

      --
      -no broken link
    4. Re:Use the Force by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 1

      What you say!!

      English difficult. :)

      --
      __
      Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
      GW Bu
    5. Re:Use the Force by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > > "This are not the bags you're looking for".
      > Don't you mean, "All your base are belong to us"?

      He means a riff on "These aren't the droids you're looking for."

  126. are you skerd? by 3seas · · Score: 1

    What this is really about is concern over terrorist attacks. But given what the targets have been so far, large events don't seem to be on the target list. So why the concern? Is there something different about the computer industry
    that would make it a good target?

    The story of Microsofts Reno licensings office getting an anthrax letter seems to have been dropped, even from the list of anthrax hits.

    So the computer industry must be alot closer to being angels than world markets, news media and politics?

    Hmmm, well it's just a thought. Are you Skerd?

  127. Re:Quick! Try to look like you're doing something! by liposuction · · Score: 0

    so true

    --
    "Thoughts are more powerful than any weapon, and I don't even let my people own guns." --Joseph Stalin
  128. Anthrax, Smallpox....that's not scary. by GISboy · · Score: 1

    MPAA, RIAA, SSSCA, DMCA (or DCMA if you are a sony employee reading this), PATRIOT....

    Now those are things that give me nightmares.

    Besides, as a former veteran I've probably been vaccinated for diseases like smallpox, bubonic plague and common sense, you know things that have not existed in the government/military for years.

    --
    If it is not on fire, it is a software problem.
  129. Re:Blow up? I think this is about anthrax or so... by Phanatic1a · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Man brings bag of anthrax in pants pocket(or even better, crotch it) to show. He breaks in to the maintenence room, spreads it in to the outlet duct of the HVAC system.

    If that's the scenario, than these announced new security procedures would accomplish precisely dick in the way of stopping it. About the only thing that would stop that is a full pat-down search of everyone entering the event, which is a practical difficulty if nothing else.

    I like the fact that they're at least trying to do something though.

    Why do you like the fact that they're wasting everybody's time and restricting everybody's freedom to do stuff that won't do a damn thing to prevent the stuff you're afraid of anyway?

  130. COMDEX is a waste because... by liposuction · · Score: 0

    Well.. Personally I think that it's a bit of a snowball effect. Once M$ and Redhat pulled out, everyone else started to pull out. Cisco, intel, AMD. Everyone wants to go where M$ is, and M$ want's to go where the most geeks are. So last year it was E3, I think. It's kind of like the Wallmart issue we have here in US. Wallmart comes in to small town and builds HUGE store. Small shops all close up. People leave, property sits empty, Wallmart does less and less buisness, leaves, then the town colapses.

    Same with COMDEX. M$ sees a geek gathering, comes in and sponsers the gathering, builds the biggest, most shiney booth there. Then sees that another show is "better". Realizes that they now have a console too, and decides that if they can use the console to get into that show, then they can push XP, and all of the next versions: sedcut and lester(or whatever). M$'s money leaves, other vendors leave. Show colapses. Show tells you to enter naked. I've seen it a million times.

    Just wait till M$ decides to crash Defcon.

    --
    "Thoughts are more powerful than any weapon, and I don't even let my people own guns." --Joseph Stalin
  131. Re:Blow up? I think this is about anthrax or so... by lobsterGun · · Score: 1

    >Terrorists are too small and secretive to be defeated by millitary force of any size.
    >Diplomacy is the only option that has been proven to work.

    Not entirely true. The Abu Nidal Group was entirely wiped out through the use of military force. It took a lot of people working together all over the world and some pretty nasty tactics, but the entire organization was eliminated.

  132. no bags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I guess terrorist have to become vendors before they are allowed to blow up the conference.

  133. you missed the point by Erris · · Score: 1
    The point was that reppresive and unamerican measures fail to prevent crime. No justification of criminal acts, such as blowing up school busses or office buildings, was implied. I could just as well have pointed to the German and Russian conquest of Warsaw, or the French underground. National IDs, racial biggotry, ethinic cleansing, laws agains all things that could be considered weapons, death penalties, extrajudical killings, etc, can not and will not stop determined resistance or criminals. Assasins will continue to kill Israeli soldiers, and criminals will continue to kill innocent Israli citizens. The ablsolute lock down that Palestinians live under, while unjust and indefensible, is also futile. It is a good example of the worthlesness of the half measures imposed on the visitors to Comdex.

    The topic is Comdex and their worthless un-American "security". The sins of others are only tangentially related as exapmles of futile behavior we should neither approve of nor tollerate.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  134. AMEN! by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 3, Funny

    The University of Oklahoma has now taken to not allowing bags inside at football games. Formerly, you could bring in a bag of snacks for your kids rather than pay the outrageous $$$ for stadium snacks. Of course, you can't go outside at halftime either, all in the guise of security (never mind that the stadium is OPEN during the week -- I know because I run steps there all the time -- and you could plant a bomb with ease on a timer). The halftime thing is so they don't lose $$$ to people who go outside. After all, we know a terrorist would only blow up the stadium after going to O'Connell's for a beer at halftime.

    what a joke.

  135. Re:Blow up? I think this is about anthrax or so... by nels_tomlinson · · Score: 2
    I like the fact that they're at least trying to do something though..

    There you hit the nail on the head. They look good, never mind whether this will have any effect, let alone a salubrious one.

    This is necessary first to calm the unthinkingly nervous, and second to cover their asses in the incredibly unlikely event that a terrorist does try to do harm.

    This won't do much to calm the thinking nervous; a little thought will suggest that terrorists have upped their planning horizon far beyond the spur-of-the-moment 60's -- style ``carry in some guns and wing a few people and take some hostages and fly to Libya'' stuff that this would help with.

    This policy wouldn't have hindered Timothy McVeigh, nor the unibomber, nor the September 11 hijackers, nor the next group of terrorists. What will discourage terrorists is swift, destructive retaliation against their cause, so that every terrorist act clearly sets back their cause.

    I think that most of the domestic response to the recent events have been nothing but c.y.a. window dressing, with the same sort of logic and effectivness as gun control: none. See here and here and here and here among other references, for some ideas about that.

    Treating honest folks like criminals only aids the criminals in the long run; it gives us the illusion that we are on the same side as them, because we and the criminals have a common enemy in the government. Take a look here for some discussion of how governments can go very wrong indeed.

  136. An additional way to protest by metamatic · · Score: 1, Troll

    Take a black permanent marker with you, and write



    FUCK YOU

    COMDEX

    NAZIS



    on the bag after you've turned it inside out.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  137. Re:Blow up? I think this is about anthrax or so... by smillie · · Score: 1

    2. Negotiate

    Just whom should we be negotiating with? No one has taken credit or made any demands for any of 9/11. No one has taken credit or made demands for the anthrax letters.

    Should we just start giving consessions to any state that might have a minority group that doesn't like the US? I think that would include the entire world including. Even England has its Yank haters.

    I think you need a reality check.

    --

    Dyslexics Untie!

  138. Naked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    and shackled! And blindfolded. And all ears and noses plugged. No wait, let's operate on the spinal cords of infants and start cutting all but the nerves which regulate breathing and heartbeat. Absolutely no sensory input or mobility for anyone, then we'll be safe!!

  139. Re:Cables? How about silk ties? by Pyrosz · · Score: 1

    Good point.
    What about that belt around your waist? Or for that matter, your shoe laces? I keep wondering how far they will go. How about your tooth brush? This is commonly used in jails to make shivs (sp?) out of... doesn't set off metal detectors or scanners either. The little metal bands used in some headphones could be turned into a knife easy enough. It comes down to two words, How Far?

    --

    An optimist believes we live in the best world possible; a pessimist fears this is true.
  140. A movie theater operator, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally:

    Dear movie theater owner/operator

    I'm not paying money to watch fucking Glossette and "Zoom Zoom" commercials! I think you have bigger problems than lost concession stand sales to worry about. You can't very well sell snacks if nobody's coming in to pay to watch commercials with a movie attached.

    Sincerely,
    One person who has stopped seeing movies in theaters since they jacked the price from $8.50 to $12.00 (Canadian) *and* added commercials.

  141. Re:Quick! Try to look like you're doing something! by perky · · Score: 1
    When was the last time anyone went bezerk or committed mass murder at a computer show?

    --
    "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
  142. Riight... by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    Try an iPaq running Linux/*BSD and an 802.11 card- if they can afford a laptop, they probably can afford the slightly cheaper and even less obtrusive palmtop computer.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    1. Re:Riight... by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2

      A Toshiba Libretto also would work nicely.

      Let's type to kill the 20 second timer now that this is the third time I've tried to post this.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    2. Re:Riight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I was going I'd def. get a camera module for my visor :)

  143. Nevada Concealed Weapon License info by Damiano · · Score: 1

    For those seriously considering carrying a sidearm in Nevada, I'd highly suggest checking out www.packing.org for information about obtaining a permit to legally carry. Stay safe. Damiano

  144. About damn time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Who needs a bunch of dried-up, ugly old hags blocking everyone with their stolen shopping carts?

    But has the ACLU filed suit in support of their rights yet?

  145. Biometric Colon Scanner by rsimmons · · Score: 1

    I wonder when they will introduce the biometric colon scanner to screen people on their way in the door? I can see it now:

    "Excuse me sir, could you step over here?"

    "Why?"

    "This will only take a moment. Take this plastic protector and slip it over the probe in the middle of that chair over there. Then just have a seat."

    1. Re:Biometric Colon Scanner by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > "This will only take a moment. Take this plastic protector and slip it over the probe in the middle of that chair over there. Then just have a seat."

      Aha! We've found the goatse.cx guy's new business venture! He's at COMDEX!

  146. Who could you pay.... by Master_Ruthless · · Score: 2, Funny

    to stripsearch a bunch of overwight, sweaty coders with Mountain-Dew stained sweatpants??

  147. Re:Blow up? I think this is about anthrax or so... by evilandi · · Score: 2
    Should we just start giving consessions to any state that might have a minority group that doesn't like the US?

    Firstly, negotiating is not giving concessions away. Negotiating is bargaining. Negotiation is a sign of intelligence, not a sign of weakness.

    Secondly, yes, you should start negotiating to improve relationships with such states.

    If the US wasn't so hated, you wouldn't have terrorism. The UK has learned this the hard way over the past few decades. We are now a lot less moralising and control-led than we were thirty years ago, and we have seen a direct decrease in terrorism because of that.

    Would it really be so bad if the US stopped funding weapons for Israelis? Or pulled bases out of Saudi Arabia? Or opened up trade with countries which have alternative government systems? Think of the goodwill you could generate by those actions. Think of the 6,000 lives that could have been saved if you hadn't been so pig-headed not to do it before 11/09.

    Wise up, America. People dislike you, not because they're pathologically evil, but because you've done bad things.

    Admitting that we were wrong in Northern Ireland and negotiating a shared government deal has saved hundreds of lives every year in the UK.

    --
    Andrew Oakley - www.aoakley.com
  148. center of the world. Re:Ridiculous Paranoia by leuk_he · · Score: 1

    I mean *HONESTLY*, who on earth would target COMDEX,

    Every true pointy haired boss is convinced that he is the center of the world and everything turn arround him. The worst thing that could happen to the world is that they target him. That is why every big building was closed on 9/11.

    :s/pointy haired boss/american/g
    karma--

    1. Re:center of the world. Re:Ridiculous Paranoia by zangdesign · · Score: 1

      The same nuts who targeted random civilians with anthrax and killed an as yet not completely determined number of civilians at the WTC. Consider how easy it would be to spread a biological agent with a lag time of seven to ten days or more amongst COMDEX attendees. Then consider the spread of the disease once they went home.

      Really, it's probably nothing to worry too much about, but when I see some jerk get all bent out of shape just because someone is trying to protect his/her butt and several other collective butts, it just kind of pisses me off. Personally, I like the fact that SOMEONE has thought this through and decided I'm worth more alive than dead.

      I think that may be the problem with some of the rampaging Libertarian techno-geeks () I see here once in a while - they don't care about anyone else and wouldn't lift a finger to save them: after all, the victim should take responsibility for him/herself and to hell with everyone else.

      Frankly, these people NEED their own society - preferably as far away from the one I live in as possible.

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
    2. Re:center of the world. Re:Ridiculous Paranoia by leuk_he · · Score: 1

      Personally, I like the fact that SOMEONE has thought this through and decided I'm worth more alive than dead.

      -The actions taken do not matter that much (read other posts about possibilties)
      -It all falls down to some PR

  149. draft the unpatriotic bastard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Incrediably selfish people like you should be immediately drafted and sent to Afiganstan to fight. That way you may think further than your two inch organ.

  150. Throw an army of underpaid security guards at 'em! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Osama can't outsmart them! Better yet,
    make sure the security guard company
    is owned by a Republican campaign contributor
    and staffed by illegal aliens and H1B technology
    specialists. No way terrorist
    could get through that.

  151. See no evil, hear no evil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You dumb fuck.

    And the guy to which you responded has his head in the sand too.

    Just dont come crying to me or anyone else when you get shot in the ass.

  152. Some facts, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Today on the BBC I saw this american congressman (or maybe he was a general) saying "We have to bomb Afghanistan because we have to do something and we can't think of anything else to do"

    I dont buy it. Im afraid I need a name. It sounds like a typical made-up "blame america" quote, or just something taken out of context, like the Joe Biden comment from 2 weeks ago

  153. Re:Blow up? I think this is about anthrax or so... by Indomitus · · Score: 1

    In a recent Tom Clancy book (don't throw heavy objects at me please) one of the plot points was a group of terrorists that developed an ebola strain that they could spread by putting it into fake shaving cream containers. They had guys go to various boat/gun/etc shows, put the cans down near active areas and activate the spray nozzles to release it into the air. One of the interesting things about it was the focus on the fact that since so many people fly around the country so often, a disease that doesn't kill quickly and is contagious would spread around the country, and the world, pretty quickly due to the freedom of travel that we have.

  154. losing our libirties one at a time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety dese
    rve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin

  155. Re:Cables? How about silk ties? by bluebomber · · Score: 2

    What about my thumb? I could put out your eye!! Only my right one, though, I'm not quite coordinated enough with my left hand (yet) to do much damage.

  156. Re:Angry Dot Bombers - Nothing Has Changed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Were you blown up at the last COMDEX? Or the one before that? Why on earth would you be blown up at the next one. Nothing has changed except the media's perception of risk, and therefore that of the following herd. Which needs no comment.

  157. no sacking the venders... by sad+sack · · Score: 1

    Comdex is known for the freebees so why dont they just hand out clear bags?(not hard to see that one coming) and as far as laptops go this is a computer show.... if a bomber wanted to carry a bomb in he'd strap it to his a#% and come in empty handed..... so what ever happened the war on drugs oh yeah we lost that one......leave the show as it is but make the models go through the strip search...

  158. This really suckes big time by heyday · · Score: 1

    Man.... I always take a backpack with me to put all the useless papers that are shoved at me.... now I'm going to have to carry around one of those lame IBM cardboard briefcases..... or worse yet.... the IOMEGA click of death bag.

    Actualy this might be interesting.... maybe somone will come up with a cool bag and now the deal will be "Who has the coolest Bag"

    Well there go my arms.... next thing you know they will not allow you to wear tennis-shoes....

    --
    ************* www.phonecow.com www.handerazone.com
  159. American Foreign Policy is Not Hysterical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Throwing minimum wage illegal alien "security
    guards" at the problem is hysteria, but bombing
    the eff out of Ahganistan is not. We are
    attacking Al Quaeda and their "enablers" because
    the cost of NOT attacking them is too high.
    If American just relys on "sanctions" and "diplomacy", potential anti-American nations such
    as China, India, Iran, etc. might decide that
    the costs of harbouring terrorists is not too high. We are bombing because we must destroy the
    Taliban and the tens of thousands of "jihad terrorists" in their regime. Oh, and your attitude is typically European. You say "... I still consider my freedom more valuable than my life."
    Americans say : "GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH!!!"

    1. Re:American Foreign Policy is Not Hysterical. by denseboy · · Score: 1

      > Americans say : "GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH!!!"

      m00h.

      Talk about irony.

  160. Here's what I would do to make planes safe by ka9dgx · · Score: 2

    1. All luggage goes on that plane over there...
    2. Everyone who wants to carry a gun may do so, by the way, you can borrow one of these if you need it.
    Crazy? Maybe.
    Effective? Probably.
    --Mike--

  161. Looking the wrong way by markmoss · · Score: 2

    If Bin Laden wants to blow up Comdex (which seems unlikely), they won't bother smuggling in a little bomb disguised as a laptop. With his budget, they can rent a booth and bring in a few hundred pounds of explosives tucked inside computer cases...

  162. A Legal Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't have an explicit legal right to breathe in public or private property either. They don't have an explicit legal right to stop their neighbors from using up all the available oxygen in the neighborhood either.

    People like you need to have the explicit 2nd amendment rights of others demonstrated. People like you are what McVeigh _wanted_ to eliminte. A pity there's no explicit location where only people like you would have benn targetted.

    Osama Bin Laden is (sort of) honest about what he hates. You are no. In my book, that makes you worse.

    1. Re:A Legal Right by Gen.+Ho+Lee+Phuc · · Score: 1

      What exactly does Bin Laden or McVeigh have to do with Comdex? Please stop with the rhetorical bullshit.

    2. Re:A Legal Right by mosch · · Score: 2

      Please direct all further contact to my office at 935 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20535-0001, or give me a call at 202-324-3000.

    3. Re:A Legal Right by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1

      Wow, not only are you a spook...

      ...but you've got a sub-300 Slashdot UID.

      You are the most leet of all.

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  163. Who last committed mass murder at a computer show? by Nonesuch · · Score: 1
    There's a huge crossover between the 'gun crowd' and the 'computer crowd'. You'd be suprised to know how many techies are packing these days.

    http://geekswithguns.com/

  164. Why does the US have to over-react? by cheeseflan · · Score: 1

    Us Brits have been seeing attacks for a while because of the Troubles in Northern Ireland. Shows and public events don't have to ban bags or act in the unfocussed way we have seen in the last month or so. Why doesn't the US learn from the rest of the world how to live with terrorism the way we have?


    For example: everywhere in public in the UK if you see an unattended bag you immediately tell a guard/porter/security guard/policeman/someone-with-a-sash-on-that-looks- vaguely-official. Then you move a long way away immediately. No-one apart from American backpackers leaves a bag unattended in the UK and the Americans only do it once when they are arrested under anti-terrorism laws.


    Like so many things, little changes to behaviour make all of the difference - there are no bins in railway stations and malls, and those in the high street are bomb-proofed up to about 2kg of semtex (way above the amount needed to bring a Pan-Am Jumbo down on Lockerbie). If you have litter, you take it home or just drop it - as there is nowhere to put it.


    It's things like that rather than USA PATRIOT which keep you safe(er).


    Come on you guys! Learn from those who have been living with this for three decades!

    --

    Pimping my Karma Whore since 1847.

  165. There is nothing more disgusting... by GeneralEmergency · · Score: 1


    ...than non-justifyable, irrational security. It ALWAYS reduces attendance, and WORSE, it conveys the impression that whomever is attending the event is somehow more important than the rest of us.

    It smacks of elitism and stinks of pants-soiling fear BOTH at the same time.

    A recent example you ask? The Emmys.

    --
    "A microprocessor... is a terrible thing to waste." --
    GeneralEmergency
  166. Re:Blow up? I think this is about anthrax or so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like your plan, but it's got one minor flaw. It would require logic and common sense in our leaders. So we're doomed...

  167. What about the PRESS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No cameras, no bags, no exceptions... ???
    So there will be no press coverage, no cameras, no press pictures.
    I think COMDEX is taking this a little too far. Increased security is good, absurd security is lame.
    How many vendors are guaranteed to have bags for you to use? There usually isn't many vendors with bags, plan on them running out on day one.

    thanks for your support.

  168. You play too much quake. Real life is tough. by Nonesuch · · Score: 1
    Bullshit. Four (well-trained, drug-enhanced, whatever) people with pistols are not going to massacre four hundred unarmed conference attendees.

    Real life doesn't work that way. Look at the various other shooting sprees. Ten or so people get shot, then a bunch of overweight ex-high-school-football players with a hero complex pile onto your four terrorists and drag them to the floor.

    It just takes a couple of people with carry permits and a lack of respect for these stupid 'disarm the sheeple at public events' restrictions to put a serious crimp in the style of your four armed attackers.

    Ebola in the fire supression system? You must be a Tom Clancy fan.

  169. Diet Rite is even better by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Try Diet Dr. Pepper. Somehow they managed to hide the weird, malty Aspartame taste better than most others.

    Or you can drink DietRite cola, which doesn't even have aspartame, instead using Ace-K and sucralose. In addition, DietRite cola has no sodium and no caffeine (good for college students who have to get up for class tomorrow). Most of my friends consider it the only diet cola worth drinking.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  170. Just like DeCSS by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Whether the reason for high ticket prices and low profit margin is the cost of obtaining the film, the cost of the projectionist, the cost of the facility, the cost of making the movie, the cost of actors, or the cost of the ad campaigns that try to make a piece of garbage look appealing by plastering the movie's name over everything

    ...the cost of frivolous lawsuits that studios file against consumers who act within their constitutional right to watch DVD videos for which they have purchased a legitimate license. (The U.S. Constitution and foreign counterparts trump statutes such as DMCA and foreign counterparts.)

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  171. Annoyances by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    > This is why I use Active Desktop to make my computer boot up and look like a bomb timer.

    And when you pull this little trick, I truly hope that some overly nervous airline employee calls in the cavalry on you, and you get detained for an annoying long time. Pulling pranks that serve only to make people nervous is rude, because it takes up time, especially the time of the people waiting in the now-stalled line who just want to get through the damn checkpoint in time to grab a muffin before they have to board the plane. Perhaps if you get your cute-joke laptop confiscated and have to spend three days getting it back, you'll get a handle on the whole "actng like an adult" thing.

    > You can hold enough plastique in your shirt pocket to blow out a window and crash a plane.

    A pocket full of plastique would not be sufficient to take down a passenger airliner from the inside without a large measure of luck. Blowing out a window will depressurize the cabin (if it's done at sufficient altitude) but that's extremely unlikely to disable the aircraft. Taking down a plane by breaking a window is Hollywood stuff, not reality.

    Now, if you threatened to blow up the food cart, that would frighten more people. Of course, based on some airline food, you might just get a medal for that...

    Virg

    1. Re:Annoyances by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Gee, well, that's why I don't actually do that with my laptop. I don't even have a laptop. I was kidding. And I'm not in an airport, so that's ok. Relax.

      And I guess I might be wrong about the window blow out downing the plane. I thought there was a plane that went down in the mid nineties due to a slightly ajar baggage door that came off and tore the pressure tube. You couldn't get as much mileage from the collateral damage from the window?

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    2. Re:Annoyances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > And I guess I might be wrong about the window blow out downing the plane. I thought there was a plane that went down in the mid nineties due to a slightly ajar baggage door that came off and tore the pressure tube. You couldn't get as much mileage from the collateral damage from the window?

      That window is A Lot smaller than a cargo door, and there's a lot less risk of the window blowout also taking out hydraulic lines or whatever else might be routed under that door.

  172. Carry Permits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those people with carry permits are banned from the convention, for the "safety" of others.

    The false sense of security precautions which are being taken merely disarm the innocent. And few ex football jocks go to comdex ;p

  173. I Hope Not by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    > Joking aside, I have one word for comdex since a few years... unorganized computer flea market...

    I hope joking isn't aside here, since "unorganized computer flea market" is a little big for one word....

    Virg

  174. Re:Quick! Try to look like you're doing something! by Tackhead · · Score: 2
    > When was the last time anyone went bezerk or committed mass murder at a computer show?

    I don't know about mass murder, but I've seem some pretty insane things spewed forth from the mouths of marketroids during just about every trade show I've attended. *g*

  175. Re:Blow up? I think this is about anthrax or so... by homer_ca · · Score: 1

    Considering that smallpox isn't contagious during the incubation period, a suicide bio-terrorist wouldn't be very effective. A sick person covered with boils would have a hard time blending into the crowd.

  176. Drool, drool, drool, OK. by Erris · · Score: 1
    It's insulting. It's a computer conference, right? It's supposed to be attended by computer professionals, right? You would expect many to own laptops and for many to conduct their business on those laptops. This ban, while not a violation of rights, shows contempt for the people attending. They are being treated like the "consumers" the folks putting the show on would like them to be.

    Line right up folks and spend your money. Pfththth!

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  177. The Baton Rouge Gun and Knife Show by Erris · · Score: 1

    Everyone drew, there was one big noise and no one walked out alive!

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  178. Darwin Award: Gun store robbery... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, there was that fellow who got himself nominated for a Darwin Award...

    He tried to rob a gun shop... While an officer in uniform was standing at the counter, and several other armed folks were nearby...

  179. Yeah by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 1

    Actually I did a search on Google to find the right spelling and meaning.

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
  180. Warning: SUFFOCATION HAZARD by dstone · · Score: 3, Funny

    Careful! Those vendor-supplied plastic bags are not toys.

  181. You complainers should read Clancy books... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    In "Debt of Honor" terrorists brought biochems. that were airborn into tradeshows contained in shaving creme cans. They would set them off behind a curtain like a bug bomb. Pretty soon, a large portion of the U.S. is infected. Granted, the virus in the book was contagious (modified Ebola), but all it has taken is 17 exposures to cause the U.S. to go into "better be careful" mode. What would a few hundred infections do? What? You don't think Clancy has inside info. on what they are most likely scared of? In that same book a Japanese pilot blaming the U.S. for his personal problems slams a jumbo jet into the White House during a ceremony. Clancy has been hassled by the govt. in the past for knowing way too much for a civilian. I'm not saying we all need to stay home, but what is wrong with being a little cautious? Is it gonna kill you not to have your own personal bag at a tradeshow? What is this garbage about taking away another right? You people are the same ones that would bitch when the govt. doesn't say anything for fear of violating your rights, and then something bad happens. Quit worrying about those stupid give-aways and Get over it!

  182. Security != Freedom by Webmoth · · Score: 2

    The concept of "national security" is realized when a government's leaders and officials cannot be easily deposed, when the form of government is not easily changed, when the government is not easily overthrown. It comes at the price of individual freedom. Personal security and freedom can only be realized with limited government.

    The Constitution of the United States, by design and by intention, organized an insecure form of governent. The beauty of the Constitution is that it gives limited rights to the government and unlimited rights to the people (including, ironically, the right to give up those rights). Sadly, "we the people" have given our government too many liberties while limiting ourselves in the name of "security"! As someone pointed out earlier (to paraphrase), "how many nut cases have gone on killing rampages at gun shows?" Where there is personal security there is individual freedom. Where there is widespread individual freedom AND RESPONSIBILITY, there is no need for an oppressive government. Two hundred twenty five years ago, our forefathers proved this. It worked for a long time.

    A little revolution now and then is a good thing.

    --
    Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
    1. Re:Security != Freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, Bin Laden and his crew acted real responsible on those planes. I'm sure we can count on them to act real responsible at tradeshows too.

  183. It'll be the best show ever! by kasnj · · Score: 1

    "No people of any kind will be allowed in any of the keynote programs," the site states. "This includes speakers, support teams, booth babes, conference attendees, sales reps, etc. No spectators will be allowed."

  184. Gives new meaning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... to the phrase "dot bomb."

    Sorry :-P

  185. Comdex has now relented by btempleton · · Score: 2
    You can have your laptop, but not your bag.

    Note here

    You have to put your laptop in a fine vendor bag I guess.

    --
    Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
  186. Re:Blow up? I think this is about anthrax or so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhhh...so your pedantic point about airborne strains of Ebola is moot, since the strain you mention doesn't infect human beings?

    This makes you technically correct, and a moron, all at the same time.

  187. This does a lot of good. by Karel+Capek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's like the smart people of London. Back in the days of the IRA bomb scare someone thought of the swell idea to remove all the garbage cans from the streets. That way, the IRA crowd would have no way to plant bombs and would revert to peaceful beekeeping.

    The truth is, actions like these only serve to give the public the illusion of safety, to provide an example of determined action. If someone really wants to cause havoc they will, garbage cans or not.

  188. Where can they take this to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are they gonna arrest people too, like the Skylarov case?
    Why waste money to go there if you will get arrested for trying out some passwords on windowsXP screensaved desktops that are just standing there in the corner unnoticed.

  189. Re:Blow up? I think this is about anthrax or so... by forsaken33 · · Score: 1

    yep Rainbow 6, good read.
    You wanna read smething scary, read Storming Heaven by Dale Brown. Its freaky. Its about planes......and them crashing in to certain things

    --
    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe =UTF-8&q=. amusing....
  190. Re:One baggy could kill everyone reading this, eas by autocracy · · Score: 2

    Wow, I guess that means I could get that into a fake card for the Springboard modules of my Visor. Better ban those too, 'cause if you've got the determination to run this in a laptop, it ain't gonna be hard to stick it in a Palm...

    --
    SIG: HUP
  191. Tshirt suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "I went to comdex and I got was a lousy cavity search"

  192. Not illegal in canada by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    to take for free what they WON'T let you pay for.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  193. oh the humanity ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh the horror!

    Can you imagine it - some few ones from one of the least-reputable shows in Vegas infiltrate Comdex, and suddenly down on the main drag you have a man dressed in a security uniform being harangued by a sweet young thing:

    "But I want to be strip-searched!"

    "In public?"

    "It's my right to be strip-searched in public by a big hunk of a man like you!"

    "Okay! And you'll strip-search me?"

    ... and so the sorry tale goes on ...

    Meanwhile the real security guards are gaping, mouths wide open .... those that aren't cheering, ...

    Ditto for the rest of Comdex!!!

  194. You can't cure wounds... by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 1

    You can't cure wounds by constantly poking them with a knife.

    In reply to the first anonymous coward: I have no idea what the man's name was. He was american and he was wearing something that looked like a military uniform. I know that in the USA lots of congressmen are ex-military, so he may also have been a congressman. I don't even know the names of most politicians in my country; I'm definitely not going to waste time learning those of other countries'. You're free not to believe anything I say. My grandfather never believed men had walked on the moon (maybe he was right and it was all a fake, who knows?).

    Bluebomber, actually that was my point, or at least one of my main points. There's nothing wrong with wars (well...). They're part of human political history and lots of countries that were at war at some point are now best of friends. In fact, the countries that the USA were actually at war with (England, Germany, Japan, Mexico) are now their partners and allies. But you can't have wars by proxy and pretend you're not involved. And that's what's been happening in the last few decades. The british decided to give Palestine to the jews because they felt guilty for not helping them before WW2. They overlooked one small detail: other people were living there. And since then, the USA have been supporting Israel (with money, weapons and international lobbying) against pretty much all neighbouring countries because they see it (Israel) as "foothold" in a very important part of the globe. Since the USA has a lot of money and a lot of bombs, most other countries turn a blind eye. But the people actually living there can't, because no matter where they turn their eyes they see Israeli soldiers, armed with american weapons. Killing them and taking their land.

    For those who don't get it (americans, mostly, and some british), let me try to put things in perspective: Imagine you're an american (if you are american, this should be easy). One day, the chinese give you a call and say "hi, we've decided to give New York to the mongols", and the next day a huge ship full of mongols arrives and they start settling all over NY. The people of NY probably don't feel terribly happy about it. So they say "wait a minute, we were here first" and "we're very sorry the mongols were driven out of their country, but why should they get ours, why don't you make room for them in China?" but the chinese say "this is the way it's gonna be because we say so", and they give the mongols money and weapons to fight the new-yorkers. So now besides not being crazy about the mongols, the people of NY start hating the chinese, too. They manage to save some money and get a few weapons, but they're no match for the chinese weapons the mongols are using (and getting for free). Soon the new-yorkers are out of bullets and broke. They try to get help from other countries, but everyone ignores them and says it's none of their business. The new-yorkers just can't understand this, because those countries usually jump in whenever similar things happen elsewhere. So they start to believe there's an international conspiracy against them, led by the chinese, of which the mongols are just an instrument. And, objectively, it would be very hard to see things any other way.

    Meanwhile, chinese TV keeps running stories about how the evil and primitive new-yorkers are throwing stones at the civilised and handsome mongols (forgetting to mention that the mongols are responding with chinese bullets and missiles and tanks). So the people of China start to hate the new-yorkers, which is just what the chinese goverment wants, because that means they can now send the mongols weapons with public support.

    So one day the new-yorkers decide that, since they have nothing left to lose, they're going to blow up something in Beijing, and at least force the chinese to acknowledge there's a war going on. So a few of them infiltrate china and, in a suicide mission, manage to blow up the ballroom of the imperial palace. Now the chinese people start crying "these new-yorkers are madmen!" and "that was a barbaric, unprovoked attack!" and so what does their goverment do? Bomb New Jersey. Because, they say, the attack was certainly planned by John Williams, the dangerous Brooklin terrorist that is currently hiding in NJ. They don't show any proof, but they say they don't have to. Since they have a lot of money and a lot of bombs, other countries are very quick to agree, and even to join them (glad it isn't them being bombed this time).

    What happens is that, slowly, other people all over the world start to get fed up with the arrogance of the chinese. The chinese solution is to bomb them too, or at least threaten to do so. But the people of China are starting to suspect that they're not God's chosen people after all, and that they can be hit. And if three or four guys managed to blow up their imperial palace's ballroom, what could one thousand or one million enemies do? They're starting to understand that they will suffer the consequences of their government's actions. And some of them are starting to say "why is it are we supporting the mongols, again...?" and "if we were in the new-yorkers' place, wouldn't we do exactly the same?". And to that the chinese goverment says "er... we have to bomb the newyorkese because they are a threat to civililization and democraciness!"

    So now, you ask, how do you solve this mess? Definitely not by bombing more people. Unless you're planning to bomb absolutely everyone. Because the more people you bomb, the more enemies you make. And the harder it becomes to justify your bombings based on the argument that the people you are bombing are savage killers. In fact, the USA have killed more people than any other country in the world (in Hiroshima they killed 300.000 in one day, not counting the after-effects). You solve this mess by admitting you were wrong. You solve it by giving back what you took (or as much of it as you still can) and by helping the people you wronged. It takes a lot more balls to say you're sorry and to admit you were wrong than it does to press a button and blow up a miserable village somewhere in the middle of a desert. But that's also the difference between being able to sleep at night and having to keep both eyes open all the time. And even with both eyes open, you can only look in one direction at a time.

    The american people need to understand this. Because their governemnt and their armed forces clearly won't. They have nuclear shelters and aircraft escorts, why should they worry about aircraft flying into buildings? Great, that gives them an excuse to strike back harder. For them it's just a game. For the people on the streets (of NY, of Palestine, of Kabul), it's their life.

    Back to the subject of security at Comdex and similar events: what can a bag or a laptop carry that you can't carry under your clothes? And can't everyone understand that? So how does that sort of measure make people feel "safer"? Only very stupid people, or people who think that terrorists are all very stupid. The only thing that sort of measure does is limit people's freedom and make their lives harder.