Slashdot Mirror


Concept PC 2001

Rami Kassab writes: "Check out this sweet PC developed by HP. It runs on the Intel P4 and features a wireless keyboard, mouse, even a wireless 18" flat screen LCD monitor. The wireless mouse and keyboard run over RF. All of the components are connected to eachother via Bluetooth technology. Included with this PC is USB 2.0 and an ATI 7500 AGP card." The screen looks a little strange, but I always love seeing interesting new designs for these boxes since I spend so much time in front of one.

273 comments

  1. Non-Wireless Monitor? by bwindle2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Maybe its just me, but I didn't see anything about a wireless monitor..."DVI Interface LCD monitor" "and an 18" flat screen LCD monitor to top things off".

    1. Re:Non-Wireless Monitor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll bet a wireless monitor really eats the batteries!

    2. Re:Non-Wireless Monitor? by silicon_synapse · · Score: 2

      Monitor? Have you looked at the picture? Looks like a microwave to me. And just yesterday I was joking about building a pc inside an old microwave.

    3. Re:Non-Wireless Monitor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wireless? Wha?? Who cares about -wireless- with that retro chic "68 Zenith" look!!
      Man, you folks are totally missing the number one feature of this sleek new machine: The "display" looks exactly like a tube fired 1968 Zenith "portable" television. Come on, check out the UHF channel selector (I believe they were called knobs) on the left and matching VHF chennel slector on the right.
      I predict this product will SWEEP -the- -computer- -market-, starting with the critical as yet untapped senior citizen demographic. Once Grandpas traded in his corvette for a prius what's he going to spend juniors inheritance on next? A computer with that comforting retro look!
      The kids, of course will hate this, but it will take no longer then 14 shopping days for the grandkids (and remember the 19-25 YO demographic has the highest disposable income per capita) to sweep up this cool retro-hip machine. If for no other reason then to piss off the parents and get in good with Grandpa (who after all will still have -some- inheritance left when the time comes ; ) bk425

    4. Re:Non-Wireless Monitor? by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      Looks like a microwave to me

      When I first saw it. I thought it must have been a photo of an HP project from the 70's. The monitor looks like a 70's TV set.

      Microwave oven, or TV set. Either way. It looks more like one of them then a 21st century computer.

      Maybe it's the small images tricking me.

      Hmmm... flat-panel microwave oven anyone? "Only to be use with bread, waffles, or other flat foods".

    5. Re:Non-Wireless Monitor? by Tetsujin28 · · Score: 2
      When I first saw it. I thought it must have been a photo of an HP project from the 70's. The monitor looks like a 70's TV set.

      I thought the same thing -- very retro look. Which I think is kind of cool.

      --
      - - - -
      The real Tetsujin 28 is a giant robot.
    6. Re:Non-Wireless Monitor? by markmoss · · Score: 2

      Correct. DVI Interface is a cable/connector definition for a digital interface to the monitor. I'm not sure whether Bluetooth has enough bandwidth for a monitor, but it wouldn't be a good idea for most offices anyhow. Put an RF-connected monitor into every cubicle and that's way too much RF in the air...

      The mouse and keyboard are bluetooth, and that is a good idea, if it doesn't cost too much. Oh, and put a beeper in the mouse so I can hit a key and find it under the piles of paper. 8-)

  2. The Cats Will Be Very Upset by Quarters · · Score: 5, Funny

    No cables to play with and/or chew to bits. If I can't offer my computer to them as a sacrifice they'll make a beeline to the A/V gear cables.

    1. Re:The Cats Will Be Very Upset by Armand28 · · Score: 1, Informative

      There's up to 300' of cable to chew to bits. Only the mouse and keyboard are wireless, the rest is a cable bundle from the monitor to the PC, up to 300' of cable.

      --

      Armand28

      "-LINUX was a good OS, before it became a religion."
    2. Re:The Cats Will Be Very Upset by kfg · · Score: 3, Funny

      My cat is already very upset. She isn't prone to chewing cables but in the old days of TV set like monitors she loved to soak up heat and stay close to me while I was working or playing games by "Garfielding" on top of it.

      Then I brought in the first monitor with a tilt/swivel base. Scared the piss out of her the first time she tried to settle on top of it. Not IN the monitor, thank God.

      With a flat screen she won't even be able to warm up by lying *next* to it.

      By the way, the best definition of a cat that I've run across is:

      "God's way of letting you know your furniture is too good."

      KFG

  3. SOLID-STATE HDD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Does it have a flash disk thingee? Those things rock!

  4. Wireless isn't that cool by Motheius · · Score: 1

    My IBM PC jr had a wireless keyboard that came standard. For you folks who don't remember the PCjr was popular in the mid 80's

    1. Re:Wireless isn't that cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, my PCjr did not come with a wireless keyboard. But I did get some badass sidecars for it.

    2. Re:Wireless isn't that cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The PCjr's reign of popularity must have been 10 minutes during the mid-80's while I was in the shower. Man those things stunk!

    3. Re:Wireless isn't that cool by crow · · Score: 2

      Check again. I believe that all PCjrs came with a keyboard that could either use batteries with IR or a cable. Most people used the cable, since it meant not having to buy batteries.

    4. Re:Wireless isn't that cool by jacoplane · · Score: 1

      And IR wireless isn't nearly as cool as bluetooth...I imagine with IR you'd have to point your keyboard at the PC, which can be annoying to say the least.

    5. Re:Wireless isn't that cool by trentfoley · · Score: 1

      Aside from the picture on the cover of Byte magazine when introduced, the *Peanut* was never popular.

    6. Re:Wireless isn't that cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean "Wireless isn't that new"? You make the point well, that it has been done before, nothing in that means that it's a bad idea though.

      Actually I -would- hope that any wireless peripherals would have some sort of encryption on the link... bluetooth incorporates that doesn't it? Otherwise, yeah. Definetly not cool. bk425

    7. Re:Wireless isn't that cool by rnturn · · Score: 2
      ``the PCjr was popular in the mid 80's''

      Oh, really? It was slow (but then so was it's bigger brother in those days). If memory serves, it didn't include a floppy drive as standard equipment and the software available on those cartridges was... no, I take that back; there was virtually no software available in those cartridges. And the keyboard was the biggest problem of all. It probably set a record for causing unanimous negative opinion in the shortest amount of time of any PC product.

      Surely ``popular'' wasn't the word you really meant to use...

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    8. Re:Wireless isn't that cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The PCjr existed, but I wouldn't say it was 'popular.'

  5. Finally... by nll8802 · · Score: 1, Informative

    There is finally some bluetooth devices coming out. I have been using a traditional wireless keyboard and mouse (IR) for a while and get quite a few missed keystrokes and mouse jerks. Bluetooth from what I understand is supposed to eliminate this. For those of you who dont know what bluetooth is go here.

    1. Re:Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should try out Logitech's wireless keyboard and mouse. They use RF, not IR and they don't miss a beat (as long as you don't put too much metal between the device and receiver).

      I've been using them for a couple of years now and would HATE to go back to corded.

    2. Re:Finally... by Drakino · · Score: 2

      Logitech and Intel both have RF based keyboards, mice, trackballs, and game controllers. I swore I would never use an IR based product like that, (after the loads of fun I had with an IR based NES controller). They are well worth the inventment when going cordless to avoid that irritation.

      It is nice to see Bluetooth becoming the standard here though. I just want a PC with USB, Firewire, Bluetooth and 802.11g for connectivity outside the box. I'd be happy. (Ok, and maybe a Gigabit ethernet port just in case)

    3. Re:Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What annoys me is that the local shops where I am used to have lots of logitech's kit - but now they _only_ have the wirelss stuff. This annoys me, since wires don't bother me, in fact, I prefer them, since I don't need to worry about changing the batteries in my trackball.

    4. Re:Finally... by Eccles · · Score: 2

      It is nice to see Bluetooth becoming the standard here though.

      I wish it was the standard, though; Logitech and Thrustmaster are both coming out with wireless gamepads, but every RF device from either company needs its own receiver. A single receiver would save a mess of USB ports...

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  6. Not a wireless LCD by sportal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The article says nothing about this being a wireless monitor. That would be quite a task though, bet that doesn't run across 802.11b or Bluetooth.

    1. Re:Not a wireless LCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think the monitor is wireless. I know its a bit offtopic, but would a monitor be able to run off batteries? Not sure how much Volts or Watts would be required. Anyone know anything about this?

    2. Re:Not a wireless LCD by sportal · · Score: 2

      Sure a monitor can run of batteries. It's called a laptop.

    3. Re:Not a wireless LCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's still wired to the CPU though. A laptop's just a PC running off batteries.

    4. Re:Not a wireless LCD by Knick-Knack · · Score: 1

      You aren't going to connect that monitor up at 2Mb anyway. 802.11b could handle it.

    5. Re:Not a wireless LCD by Emil+Brink · · Score: 2

      How? This is an 18" screen, so let's assume (rather conservatively, IMO, and also without bothering to restart Mozilla in order to read the article again) a 1280x1024 resolution. At 24 bits per color packed, and a 30 Hz update frequency, you're looking at 943,718,400 bits per second to send to the monitor. That's 944 Mbps, which as far as I know is quite a bit more than any 802.11x standard is said to handle... Right?

      --
      main(O){10<putchar(4^--O?77-(15&5128 >>4*O):10)&&main(2+O);}
    6. Re:Not a wireless LCD by Knick-Knack · · Score: 1

      You aren't allowing for compression.

      IMHO it takes about 6Mbps to transmit a very good qualiy digital image. 802.11b can do 11Mbps, which (allowing for MAC/PHY overhead) can probably support a single monitor. 802.11a can do 54Mbps, and is another story.

      It's a bit nasty running an 802.11b network alongside bluetooth equipment, though.
      You could probably ditch bluetooth and have this "concept PC" work using its own 802.11b network.
      I would like to see two "concept PC's" running side-by side with overlapping wireless LAN's, though.
      They would be using up each others bandwidth.

      I can't see how you'd run an whole office full of these PC's on wireless LANs. They would just fall over each other.

    7. Re:Not a wireless LCD by Emil+Brink · · Score: 2

      You aren't allowing for compression.
      True, because the thought of a compressed monitor connection is too bizarre for my brain to come up with on its own. I doubt you can compress 944 Mbps down to 6 Mbps (99.4% efficiency) without loss. And I really, really do think a monitor connection should be lossless. Also, as you say, "eating up" all available wireless bandwidth just for the monitor connection seems a bit stupid with today's technology.

      --
      main(O){10<putchar(4^--O?77-(15&5128 >>4*O):10)&&main(2+O);}
  7. and power? by spankfish · · Score: 3, Offtopic

    It won't be really wireless until the power supply is also wireless ;-)

    Maybe someone can beam the power into the machine with lasers or something, but I wouldn't want to have to reboot every time a cat runs under the desk!

    --

    NO TOUCH MONKEY!
    1. Re:and power? by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      But you'd have pre-cooked cat snacks while you wait for it to come back up.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    2. Re:and power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't want to buy a new cat every time my computer mysteriously rebooted...

    3. Re:and power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the cat would only run through the beam once! :)

    4. Re:and power? by babbage · · Score: 3, Funny

      I would think that would only be a problem once.... PZZZZT!

    5. Re:and power? by slowhand · · Score: 1

      I built my 802.11 interface with old crystal radio parts. It is self powered. Now I sell the excess power back to the Electric Company:-)

      --
      Busy aligning my non-linear thoughts.
    6. Re:and power? by MindStalker · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well you can easily beam it through microwaves, and run a battery for times when the beam is crossed. Though the cat would QUICKLY learn not to cross the beam. Anyways untill we learn how to do subspace power transportation. I think the fun way would be to have 2 how swap batteries in it, and make the batteries with robot legs which are smart enough to walk over to their recharge station when they get low. And walk back and redock with your computer once filled. Get a bunch of these put the recharge station across the room and put up obstacles for it to cross. And you could have a fun time watching your pet batteries do their little labor walks. After a while it will start to feel like warcraft gold miners in your own home :)

    7. Re:and power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Maybe someone can beam the power into the machine with lasers or something, but I wouldn't want to have to reboot every time a cat runs under the desk!"

      I believe the correct way to word this is:
      "Maybe someone can beam them with feekin' laserbeems!"

      -J

    8. Re:and power? by 3ryon · · Score: 1
      Maybe someone can beam the power into the machine with lasers or something, but I wouldn't want to have to reboot every time a cat runs under the desk!


      Not to mention the terrible burning cat smell!

    9. Re:and power? by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 3, Offtopic

      That's ridiculous. Total overkill, a Rube-Goldberg-like contraption that's completely unnecessary.

      Wheeled batteries will work just fine.

    10. Re:and power? by secolactico · · Score: 1

      Actually you got me thinking about Lemmings... ah, those were the days...

      --
      No sig
    11. Re:and power? by vrmlknight · · Score: 1

      Didn't Nikola Tesla do something like this? I rember reading about a lamp that had no cords that the power went thru the air some sorta wireless that was safe. I dunno I don't rember much about Tesla except the really cool pics

      --
      This must be Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays.
    12. Re:and power? by Ravagin · · Score: 1

      Hm. Wouldn't the cat just explode? Given how much power you'd be beaming....

      The cat might explode or it might not. We won't be certain until we check....

      --

      Karma: T-rexcellent.

    13. Re:and power? by scotch · · Score: 1
      or maybe 9 times?

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    14. Re:and power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You laugh, but Nikola Tesla performed extensive experiments regarding transmitting electricity remotely. He had dreams of beaming power to devices miles away, but naturally ran into technical limitations. However, he did achieve a small degree of success in his later years with very low amounts of power at very short ranges.

      I'd provide you with a link to back this up, but naturally I'm too lazy. If you're interested, I'm sure you can dig up something good with Google :-)

      In fact, you probably shouldn't take my word for this, this is based on my memory of a PBS documentary that I saw a few years ago, so the facts may not be exact.

      Whatever.

    15. Re:and power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you don't actually have to use microwaves, a very low RF signal with an ultra high amplitude will do... This way it'll pass right through walls and homes and right into the amateur radio station down the street and then ZAP. The FCC comes breaking down your door etc. etc.. never mind...

    16. Re:and power? by OO7david · · Score: 1

      My god, that was funny. Thank you for making me laugh before sleeping.

    17. Re:and power? by psamuels · · Score: 1
      It won't be really wireless until the power supply is also wireless ;-)

      Waldo, by Heinlein. I read it a long time ago, thought it was really good. They used some sort of EM and the power company had a monopoly on power receivers, which would meter what you used. Occasionally the receivers would stop working for no detectible mechanical reason, thus bringing in the metaphysical part of the plot.

      That has always seemed like a pretty cool idea to me.

      --
      "How can you claim that you are anti-crack, while still writing a window manager?" — Metacity README
    18. Re:and power? by Desert+Raven · · Score: 1

      That has always seemed like a pretty cool idea to me.

      Beaming the power, or the fact that it would stop working for no apparent reason? :)

    19. Re:and power? by vr · · Score: 1

      It won't be really wireless until the power supply is also wireless ;-)

      You know.. Tesla actually worked on wireless transmition of electricity for a while. Unfortunately, he was not successfull.

      Before he died he claimed he had invented some
      kind of super-weapon. A particle beam of some kind.

    20. Re:and power? by markmoss · · Score: 2

      Offtopic!!! Hey, this was the one that got me started laughing out loud.

  8. Goes without sayin' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of these.

    There, I said it and I'm proud, PROUD, do you HEAR??

    Damn you all to HELL!

    1. Re:Goes without sayin' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should be proud. I wish I'd thought of it first. Imagine, a Beowulf cluster that you don't have to wire up -- just put the boxes within Bluetooth range of each other and let the cluster configure itself! Brilliant!

    2. Re:Goes without sayin' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea? Why post as AC then? No blue chips for you.

  9. If a component goes bad by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've seen systems before where the cd drive is built into the monitor (like this one). I'm curious what happens if the CD drive goes bad on you. Obviously, it would be a bit too expensive replacing the entire display, but the drive itself looks like it would have to be very slim to fit in there. Has anyone had experience with something like this, and if so, how hard is it to find a replacement drive? Just curious. :)

    Other than that, this thing looks nifty. It would make a great in-car computer if it doesn't draw too much power.

    --
    You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
    1. Re:If a component goes bad by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      I would hope they use laptop cd drives in these, for compatability's sake.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    2. Re:If a component goes bad by (H)elix1 · · Score: 2

      Same thing as replacing a 3.5" floppy on an 486(?) era HP server box that had the funky curved pannel - you pay dearly - they wanted $300 for a 1.44M floppy! Course, a normal $14 floppy fit just fine in a 5.25" w/adapter. Looks like you really will have to think "out of the box" for any repair....

    3. Re:If a component goes bad by checkyoulater · · Score: 1

      New IBM Netvista's also have small cdrom drives. I think it is just a laptop cdrom, but I haven't actually had a chance to take one apart. My first thought was also what if one of those things fails?

      Luckily, IBM is pretty good with replacement parts, but once the warranty is over, who knows?

      --
      Is that a real poncho? I mean, is that a Mexican poncho or is that a Sears poncho?
  10. wireless kbd and mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Last time I tried wireless a keyboard and mouse was about a year ago. It sucked. The keyboard dropped characters often enough to bug me, and the mouse had a tendency to "stick" as it lost its connection for brief periods. Has the technology gotten any better? It doesn't seem like that hard a problem to solve reasonably.

    1. Re:wireless kbd and mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vague criticisms aren't useful or informative. You must know more than one type of wireless technology existed even a year ago. Which were you talking about?

  11. Slashdotted! by artemis67 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now if only it had a sweet web server and some sweet bandwidth....

    -----

  12. p4! wow! by tulmad · · Score: 2, Funny

    How many more times could they have mentioned "Intel's Pentium 4" in that article? Funniest part, was when I came back to write this response there was a p4 ad running on slashdot (ugh).

    --
    "In case of emergency, break glass. Scream. Bleed to death."
  13. PCjoker by DamienMcKenna · · Score: 1

    The PCjr was a joke, as was Bill Sydnes who commissioned it while at IBM. Another example of his handiwork is the death of Commodore (specifically the Amiga).

  14. Slashdot tip of the day.... by BLAG-blast · · Score: 0, Troll
    The article says nothing about this being a wireless monitor. That would be quite a task though, bet that doesn't run across 802.11b or Bluetooth.

    Ok, if they article has "Posted by CmdrTaco" at the top then only read the parts that are in italics.

    The parts that are not in italics are either wrong, advertising or some text designed to piss you off and start many fame wars....

    Mod me OT or troll or whatever, but it's true...

    --
    M0571y H@rml355.
    1. Re:Slashdot tip of the day.... by the_rev_matt · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      The part you quote was in italics. The submitter, not the approver (CmdrTaco) made the error.

      --
      this is getting old and so are you

      blog

    2. Re:Slashdot tip of the day.... by GungaDan · · Score: 1
      "and start many fame wars...."

      Dammit! Right when I'd gotten that Irene Cara song out of my head! Tell me, are these more like the West Side Story dancing gangbanger wars, or the "Thriller" dancing zombie wars?

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
  15. Wireless monitor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow! That's cool. How about calling it television?

    1. Re:Wireless monitor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude i dunno know about you but i got cable tv CABLE.... GET IT ITS GOT A FUCKING CABLE PLUGED IN TO IT

    2. Re:Wireless monitor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, but in my country cable television simply doesn't exist. Just lots of antennas on every roof.

  16. This is nothing special. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    18" TFT... Got it...
    Wireless Keyboard and mouse.. Got it...
    Silent machine.. got it...

    I don't see where the _concept_ part comes in???

    1. Re:This is nothing special. by Wiggin · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that "concept" was only used to refer to molded plastic... but since i can't get to the article, i may be wrong.

      --

      "I don't need a compass to tell me which way the wind shines." - Mr. Furious, Mystery Men
  17. This is good by Raven42rac · · Score: 0, Troll

    This is a good glimpse into the future of new technologies, with higher transfer rates and eliminated bottlenecks. But conspicuous in it's abscence is Intel's new bus architecture, 3GIO, where is it? Is it such vaporware that there are not even prototypes to use? Or does this mean that HP is endorsing Bluetooth as its connection interface of the future? I would like discussion on Hypertransport vs. Bluetooth vs. 3GIO. And which one, if any, will be the new standard.

    Insert Sig Here.

    --
    I hate sigs.
    1. Re:This is good by Raven42rac · · Score: 1

      Also, Moore's law is in danger of being broken, but in order to eliminate the other bottlenecks, I suppose that CPU's can wait for the moment.

      Insert Sig Here.

      --
      I hate sigs.
    2. Re:This is good by GunFodder · · Score: 2

      3GIO is still vaporware to discourage the uptake of HyperTransport. AMD claims that HT doesn't compete with 3GIO and Intel ignores HT completely. AMD is correct in that a working design doesn't compete with vaporware and I guess it wouldn't make sense for Intel to point customers to a design with a 2 year head start.

    3. Re:This is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't read the article, since it's not responding, but it sounds like a system that currently exists.

      3GIO is still on the drawing board.
      RapidIO is supposed to arrive soon.
      HyperTransport is in silicon but just barely.

      Bluetooth is irrelevant - if you need bandwidth higher than PCI (i.e., HT, RIO, or 3GIO), wireless won't cut it.

    4. Re:This is good by joib · · Score: 1

      3GIO is not ready yet. Don't expect it either for a few years. And it will most probably debut in expensive servers.
      HyperTransport vs. 3GIO is a valid comparison. See http://www.extremetech.com/article/0,3396,s=1005&a =18058,00.asp for more info.
      Bluetooth, on the other hand is in a completely different league. It's a wireless connect, primarily designed for simplicity, bluetooth chips cost something like $5. It's speed is something like 1Mbit/s. Contrast this with up to 10Gbit/s promised for 3GIO. That's a factor of 10000 difference in speed...

  18. RF by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1, Troll

    I have a couple problems with the devices being hooked up via RF.

    1. There is the Cancer aspect. It's obvious that no one understands the issues that may arise from having a radio transmitter around you all the time (Cel phones) let alone multiple ones around you all the time at your computer.

    2. Interferance. The FCC regulations for RF devices at these frequencies state that you have to accept whatever outside interference there is. Getting bad input on an RF mouse, display or keyboard would blow.

    Those things said, my mother had an RF remote for her C-band sat dish, and it was really neat.

    1. Re:RF by spankfish · · Score: 2

      IANAEE [electrical engineer], but it's my understanding that all electrical circuits generate electromagnetic fields and/or radiation to some degree. So unless you plan living on a small island in the middle of the Pacific, up a tree, you can pretty much assume there is a chance of cancer.

      Of course, you're much more likely to get cancer from the toxins in the air or the toxins in your food or radiation from your glow-in-the-dark alarm clock that some low-energy RF emissions.

      --

      NO TOUCH MONKEY!
    2. Re:RF by frankie · · Score: 2

      I'm surprised no one has mentioned security yet.

      Remember Tempest? Who needs ultra-senstitive EM gear to pick up blips in your monitor timing, when you can broadcast everything you do on radio...

    3. Re:RF by uslinux.net · · Score: 1
      1. There is the Cancer aspect. It's obvious that no one understands the issues that may arise from having a radio transmitter around you all the time (Cel phones) let alone multiple ones around you all the time at your computer.


      Although it (appears) true that RF energy can cause problems with cells in the body, the amount of power in an 802.11b or Bluetooth antenna is FAR less than cellular equipment. A microware cooks food at 1000 watts @ 2.5 GHz, but long term cell phone use at 1 watt is debatable (probably not good for you, anyway), and long term use of 802.11 equipment at 0.05 to 0.1 watts is most likely insignificant. Plus, RF signals degrade at 1/(n^4), so even 1 foot away from an antenna is significantly less power (though I won't debate how much radiation my left leg receives from my Lucent PCMCIA wireless card in my laptop - still, the convenience to me is with the miniscule risk).

    4. Re:RF by RadioheadKid · · Score: 2

      There is the Cancer aspect. It's obvious that no one understands the issues that may arise from having a radio transmitter around you all the time (Cel phones) let alone multiple ones around you all the time at your computer.

      Bluetooth is low power/short range, even less of a cancer risk (if there actually is a risk) and last time I checked I don't put my mouse and keyboard up to my head when I use it.

      The FCC regulations for RF devices at these frequencies state that you have to accept whatever outside interference there is. Getting bad input on an RF mouse, display or keyboard would blow

      It says that on every electronic device that falls under FCC regulation wired or wireless, like your monitor, computer, wired mouse and keyboard, sound card, etc... These protocols are designed to handle interference. One point I do worry about thought is having the batteries run out...now that sucks...

      --
      "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." -Homer Simpson
    5. Re:RF by Mr+Rohan · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth is low power/short range, even less of a cancer risk (if there actually is a risk) and last time I checked I don't put my mouse and keyboard up to my head when I use it.

      But most people sitting at a desk do have their keyboard close to their reproductive organs - which is perhaps even more dangerous than next to your head (i.e. potential to cause future damage rather than localized damage).
    6. Re:RF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you should go see Johnny Mnemonic good flick but dont worry about it casue some will end up comming up w/ a cure for it :)

    7. Re:RF by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      2. Interferance. The FCC regulations for RF devices at these frequencies state that you have to accept whatever outside interference there is.

      could somebody explain this to me? doesn't having a device accept all interference just make things all that much harder? it seems problems would be reduced dramatically by having a shielding that only allows the proper frequencies through, or some such filtering device. or maybe i'm totally misunderstanding that. anyone?

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    8. Re:RF by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 2

      It seems to me that a machine that didn't want to accept outside interference would have to have a miniature triangulation system and laser beam to disable any nearby devices causing the interference.

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
    9. Re:RF by ibennetch · · Score: 1

      The FCC isn't saying anything about shielding, rather that you have to accept the fact that you have no legal recourse if your device recieves interference. Part 15 of the FCC regulations, which many electronic devices in the US have to comply with; state two things: Your device cannot cause interference. It is not allowed. If you do; they'll come and shut it down, because of the legal issue of causing interference. The second segment of Part 15 is that you have to accept any interference you recieve. It's a matter of legal rights and the like, not of engineering. There are all sorts of things that can interfere at those frequencies, and you can't really do anything about it.

    10. Re:RF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Security: 802.11b is insecure because by default there is no encryption, and even if you turn it on it is quite hackable. Bluetooth has better security and it is ON by default, so this shouldn't be an issue.

      Cancer: The newer RF standards like 802.11b, Bluetooth, 3G phones etc spread their RF energy over a wide range of frequencies, so in fact their power at each frequency is LOWER than background noise. Correct me if I'm wrong, but that makes it very hard to fry a brain.

      It's great to see Bluetooth specified spot-on for this sort of simple application it was designed for. (And it's much cheaper than 802.11b!!)

      David Read

    11. Re:RF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention those two huge sources of electromagnetic radiaton, including RF, at our feet and in our daylight sky. RF, though, is a low-probability carcinogen; white light is much higher (skin cancer, anyone?).

  19. Slashdotted already - Offtopic by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    wow, 15 comments and its already slashdotted... now this comment isn't meant to be a troll, but... what is Slashdot doing right and other sites are doing wrong? I mean... in order for a site to be slashdotted, those browsers are being directed from slashdot, so AT LEAST that many people are browsing slashdot at any given time, yet the front page loads lightning quick, even over dial-up, and there's very little downtime, i think the rest of the web can learn something here (don't use IIS maybe)?
    anyway, not a troll, just genuinely curious

    --
    May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
    1. Re:Slashdotted already - Offtopic by imrdkl · · Score: 1

      perl and mysql. theres no magic here. just good horse sense.

    2. Re:Slashdotted already - Offtopic by sam@caveman.org · · Score: 2

      according to Netcraft, www.designtechnica.com is running Apache/1.3.19 (Unix) FrontPage/4.0.4.3. So no IIS.

      -sam

      --
      burn the computers. go back to the abacus.
    3. Re:Slashdotted already - Offtopic by brunes69 · · Score: 2

      The reason the front page loads lightning fast is the same reason you get a static page around 5% of the time, instead of the dynamic one... MySQL's speed (and MySQL's crashing).

  20. Sssseeeerrrrvvvveeerrrr lllllaaaaagggg by DamienMcKenna · · Score: 1

    Been five minutes waiting for that site to load. Time that someone used a proper CSM rather than those PHPNuke pieces o' ####.

  21. Prettier outside, same junk inside by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 4, Interesting
    How about PCs that are actually simple to upgrade or alter if we see fit? A few years back PC vendors tried removeable components, but now these designs are relegated to server-class systems (i.e. hot swappable RAID drives).

    Still to this day, upgrading a hard drive or a graphics card is an unnecesarily obfuscated process, requiring the PC guts to be cracked open and laid out on the kitchen table.

    Of course easily upgradeable components would cut into PC sales, so its probably hopeless.

    1. Re:Prettier outside, same junk inside by Pope · · Score: 1
      PC guts to be cracked open and laid out on the kitchen table

      Because it's cheaper .
      No, seriously. I love Apple's G4 case for replacing/installing drives, RAM, etc. I showed my PC-loving friends, and they were mightily impressed.

      Trying to do that to a consumer PC would necessitate raising the cost $100 or so, and every single dork on /. would scream blue murder because they cost too much. So there's your answer in a nutshell: innovation and convenience are great things, but only if it doesn't cost ME extra. :P

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    2. Re:Prettier outside, same junk inside by GunFodder · · Score: 2

      I wondered about this myself. Wouldn't a company like Dell turn a modular system into a profitable endeavor by also selling upgrade modules?

      The problem is that the desktop system market has razor-thin margins, and the extra materials necessary to make good modular interfaces would cost enough to raise the price significantly. Right now it looks like the market is moving in the opposite direction, towards more integrated systems with non-upgradable parts. Otherwise there would be no way to make $600 computers.

      I guess most people are cheap bastards, and the industry has to cater to their desires.

    3. Re:Prettier outside, same junk inside by Soko · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yup.

      No one realises that if the PC is going to be an information appliance, then it's not likely going to be very upgradeable. How many times have you swapped out parts on your toaster, or even your TV? Likely, you just go buy a new, better one that's already the way you want it. Only chipheads like us want an appliance that we can hot-rod for next to nothing. Welcome to the world of disposable goods.

      There's also the argument that things like batter memory architectures and CPU-Perepheral interconnects are rapidly improving and changing, and it's WAY expensive to future proof a PC against changes in foundation architectures. A valid argument, it would seem.

      However, when you think about it, why would a manufacturer make a PC that someone would want to keep for years and years by getting simple, cheap upgrades? The perpetual upgrade cycle keeps the PC makers (and the toxic waste disposal companies) in business. Supply/demand in action. Meh.

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    4. Re:Prettier outside, same junk inside by knarf · · Score: 2

      There's another problem with those easily upgradeable, modular systems: they are also very easily *downgraded* by thieves. This is especially worrysome in large office environments, where it is often quite easy to walk in and out with a bag full'o'drives and company secrets. I've heard about quite a number of these incidents when I worked for one of the bigger companies in The Netherlands.

      --
      --frank[at]unternet.org
    5. Re:Prettier outside, same junk inside by spudnic · · Score: 1

      At one site that I did consulting work for they had a problem with people stealing RAM (of course this was several years ago). Just to keep up with what was stolen I wrote scripts that checked the current hardware config with the database and email me when changes occured.

      My point is that if someone wants to steal something, they are going to do it.

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    6. Re:Prettier outside, same junk inside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so i care why go you... you could write a script arnt you a cool hacker that is just the coolest fucking person ever to walk the world you cock sucking circle jerking taking it in the ass little faggot

    7. Re:Prettier outside, same junk inside by Ian+Bicking · · Score: 2
      It's just not worth it to have an upgradable computer for most uses. I know how to do it fairly well, and my main computer is easily upgradable, but for instance the simple box I got for my girlfriend isn't worth bothering with -- it's easier and less of a pain to just get a new one. In the not-so-distant future I'm sure the same will be true with my own personal computer -- I might as well just replace the thing. USB, firewire, etc., only make this more true, as the more interesting, eclectic, or novel components won't be built into the computer.

      The real problem is that current computers (or perhaps operating systems) don't allow for replacement of hardware without software. At this point with Windows, the operating system decays faster than the computer anyway, so people don't notice it so much. But it isn't true for Linux, and is less and less true for Windows, and people are going to want to keep their software environment even as they replace the hardware.

      How exactly this will be possible, I'm not sure. I suppose I can imagine a piece of software that would mirror the old hard drive over to the new one, over USB or something -- it wouldn't even be a big deal if it took an hour or two to transfer, considering the benefits. Kind of like Ghost or something.

      Licensing will make this very difficult on Windows -- anyone who writes that will be asking for trouble. Also, the nature of PC hardware makes this difficult -- you'd have the wrong drivers installed once you crossed over (it would work really nicely on Apple hardware, though).

      But hey, maybe this is already available right now...? If it gets included with new computers, then there really wouldn't be much point to upgradable hardware.

    8. Re:Prettier outside, same junk inside by Teutates · · Score: 1

      The Delorean was supposed to be like that too...

      I know this because I'm working on one now :)

    9. Re:Prettier outside, same junk inside by astrotek · · Score: 1

      I think a better example of what computers will become are cars. The power users will upgrade them on their own(tires, engine, etc), others will just buy a new car. Isn't that how it is already?

    10. Re:Prettier outside, same junk inside by astrotek · · Score: 1

      Windows XP comes with a feature that allows you to transfer the documents and settings you want from your old computer to your current one. I cant remember what it is called off hand but it lets you do it from 1 harddrive to another or over a network. I found it easy to use when I upgraded so I assume that what you are describing isnt a problem.

    11. Re:Prettier outside, same junk inside by The+Paradox · · Score: 1
      Still to this day, upgrading a hard drive or a graphics card is an unnecesarily obfuscated process, requiring the PC guts to be cracked open and laid out on the kitchen table.

      The kitchen table?! You use a freakin' kitchen table?!

      Sheeeeeesh. I do so much crap with that stuff that I just rip it open right on the floor. :D Static straps are for wussies, and I've never fried a component yet.

      As for simple...to be serious, it doesn't get much simpler. Take off cover, remove old hard drive, insert new, plug in power and IDE cables. Close cover, plug everything back in, boot.

      --
      Pain(n): when you're telnetting into a box doing somethin cool, and some luser calls for help with a 'critical error' ad
    12. Re:Prettier outside, same junk inside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wondered about this myself. Wouldn't a company like Dell turn a modular system into a profitable endeavor by also selling upgrade modules?

      You ever seen an IBM PS/2? Same idea -- 'modules' snap in like legos. Very cool, until you checked the price of the module. That idea failed, btw.

      Problem is that large companies (Dell's primary customers) do not want to do any hardware work. PERIOD. It's more cost effective for them to buy a new machine than hire a tech to debug the NIC.

    13. Re:Prettier outside, same junk inside by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      But hey, maybe this is already available right now...? If it gets included with new computers, then there really wouldn't be much point to upgradable hardware.

      It came with the 40 GB Western Digital drive I just bought -- there was a floppy with setup tools and stuff, and one of the tools was to copy a partition from an old drive to the new one.

      Also, Partition Magic, Partition Commander, DriveImage, DriveCopy, and many other programs provide the same functions. So you needn't be worried about licensing ;-).

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    14. Re:Prettier outside, same junk inside by Metrol · · Score: 2

      I do so much crap with that stuff that I just rip it open right on the floor.

      Ohhh, you had a floor?? Why, when I had to go about pulling apart MFM drives to count the platters there was nothing but a patch of mud to work with along the side of the road. You'd just get the case off, then WOOOSH, a truck would come by and splash your components with mud.

      Trying telling that to kids today... they won't believe you.

      --
      The line must be drawn here. This far. No further.
    15. Re:Prettier outside, same junk inside by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      Your PC friends are buying some screwy hardware if they think your G4 is that much better than, say, a Compaq Deskpro for ease of swapping out parts. Sure it's cool looking and has a hinged door, but really. If you are opening your system up that much, buy a similar ATX case and drop your parts in there. Personally, I think rackmount cases look like the fun case of the future for the serious hardware, then we need to develop thin clients to scatter around the house/office (or get laptops with wireless networking).

      --
      I do not have a signature
  22. Behold the power of the Slashdot Effect! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With only ten posts with a score of 1 or above, the site is already down. Can anyone post the text of the article? Thanks.

    1. Re:Behold the power of the Slashdot Effect! by qualera · · Score: 1

      From: http://www.designtechnica.com/article.php?sid=689& mode=thread&order=1

      Equipped in their concept PC:
      Windows XP Pro
      Bluetooth
      RF Wireless Keyboard and mouse
      USB 2.0
      ATI low profile Radeon 7500 AGP video card
      DVI Interface LCD monitor
      The new concept is that of wireless keyboard and mouse, and an 18" flat screen
      LCD monitor to top things off. But adding to this, of course, is Intel's
      latest processor, the Pentium 4. The whole concept is that of a better working
      environment with the best technology too, but mainly to get the job done. The 2001 Concept PC uses Bluetooth technology to connect all the components and uses an RF wireless keyboard and mouse. The concept PC does not skimp on graphics either; utilizing a new ATI Radeon 7500 videocard with DVI output.
      Will we see these new PC's on shelves soon? Not likely, as Intel and HP are
      introducing new possibilities for PC's to the business and consumer, meaning
      great things can come in small packages. Although, HP will be looking into
      new ways of introducing a friendly computer to the desk at work/home. It's
      a great idea in all, but will it be something the people are looking for?
      More than likely. Consumers and businesses are always looking for better
      ways to sit at a desk and make life more enjoyable for hard working people,
      but not leaving out those who enjoy playing around.
      What we don't see often in store bought computers is air flow consideration.
      The Concept PC 2001 was built on the idea of better airflow by using aligned
      airflow for better thermal performance, and validated in industry leading
      low acoustics.

      Wow, so here's a computer that is small, fewer cables, flat screen, better
      cooling, and greater overall performance with Intel's Pentium 4 processor.
      This may be something consumers are looking for, what we don't know as of
      yet is the cost. Most of us can assume the same prices for most store bought
      computers, with a little added cost for an LCD screen though.
      Personally it's something I would not mind seeing on the shelves in the near
      future. But as for upgradeability, we can expect the same as any other computer
      on the shelves today.
      By: Scott Mikules from ipKonfig.com

    2. Re:Behold the power of the Slashdot Effect! by MrPeach · · Score: 1

      http://www.hp.com/desktops/misc/comdex/comdex.html

  23. Great!! ..now if only.. by mlati · · Score: 1

    ...they could make the toilet wireless..

    1. Re:Great!! ..now if only.. by GlassUser · · Score: 2

      If everything else is wireless, why not move to the toilet?

      How do you think I'm posting this?

    2. Re:Great!! ..now if only.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I Dont know about you, but my toilet doesnt have a single wire. All solid state (rimshot).
      If you see an electrical wire on your toilet, urine trouble (rimshot). The only contact I have is strictly for major uploads.

      Thanks! Ill be here all night!

  24. Sponsored by ... by Florian+Weimer · · Score: 2

    My sources tell me that these PCs are really cheap for foreign HP customers in the information technology sector. However, buyers should not wonder when black vans permanently circle their premises. As additional benefit, you don't have to file any patents in the U.S. any more, others are doing this for you.

  25. design technica - what a waste of a website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.designtechnica.com has got to be the worst "design" website I've ever seen. How could they possibly think dark blue, almost black, links with no underlines, could possibly be "good" design. It's so poor it's not even funny.

  26. The Monitor is Strange Looking by rogerl · · Score: 1

    The PC is pretty cool, but the monitor is kind of strange.

    1. The dials on the right look like something off of a 1960's era tv set

    2. No cables are going to the monitor

    3. The article does not say anything about the monitor being wireless. That would have to be a lot of bandwidth

    1. Re:The Monitor is Strange Looking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The dials on the right look like something off of a 1960's era tv set

      Thats the Control Boys at work, undoubtedly. Back then they limited us to B&W, as well.

  27. Wireless monitor by ejaytee · · Score: 1



    Hmmm...a wireless monitor?

    At 24bpp and a 1600x1200 display, that's 3 bytes x about 2E6 pixels per frame, times (very nominally) 60 frames per second, or ~360MBytes per second.

    If they could do that cheaply, they wouldn't be using it just for sending digital video to monitors.

    DVI is Digital Video Interface. It's neat (no more ghosting and shadowing), but not wireless.

  28. Bandwith for the video? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What technology allows to transfer video signal in real time?

  29. illegal circumvention device by libre+lover · · Score: 3, Funny

    According to the users of this device, wireless peripherals constitute an "illegal circumvention device" under the DMCA and will be filing a lawsuit against HP shortly. In the meantime they urge that all computer users stick with wired peripherals.

    ;)

    --
    Error: .sig undefined
  30. MONITOR IS WIRED by Armand28 · · Score: 0

    It comes with up to 300' of cable so you can put the base anywhere. This is slashdot, so accuracy in reporting is not a concern.

    A wireless flatscreen would SUCK. Analog = interference. Digital = too much bandwidth for wireless. 'nuff said.

    --

    Armand28

    "-LINUX was a good OS, before it became a religion."
  31. Secure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Wireless everything... because RF is so secure.

  32. What's the point? by gUmbi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sure, it uses Bluetooth, but you still have to run power cables to each one of these things, a VGA cable to the monitor and worry about replacing batteries in the keyboard.

    1. Re:What's the point? by jhoffoss · · Score: 2

      VGA Cable? Did you miss the part where it said "wireless monitor"?? Power cable, sure, but there are ways around that just as easily...besides, one white power cable dropping straight down wouldn't deter from the appearance too much.
      /jhoffoss

      --
      Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
    2. Re:What's the point? by Refrag · · Score: 2

      Apple Display Connector (ADC) is much better. It runs power, signal, and USB through the same cable into the same jack. You still only need one cable, and it is much cheaper.

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
  33. Smells fishy... by houston_pt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As anybody noticed the image on the screen is always the same in all the pictures? And no power cables shown...
    Looks more like a model to me than a real working PC...

    --
    coffee | nose > keyboard ©
    1. Re:Smells fishy... by kaimiike1970 · · Score: 1

      It clearly states that this is a 'concept'. Therefore makes no claims to be a 'working' PC... Much like the 'concept' cars at autoshows, they list all the specs but if you actually look under the hood you will discover that it is empty.

      --


      Do a google search before posting.
  34. Re:p4! wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'm sorry, but I don't see how this is a problem.


    This Post Is Powered By the Intel Pentium 4! Get yours today! If you don't, you are l4m3.

  35. Re:RF = Sniffable? by czardonic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In addition to the above, I would like to know about:

    3. How secure is this?

    I have already heard tales about being able to spoof/sniff logitech wireless mice and keyboards. Like much of wireliess tech, this just adds another layer of vulnerability. Why go through the trouble of getting a trojan onto a system, when you can do it remotely, w/o using a network? Add this to a wireless LAN, and it seems like it opens a lot of doors.

    --
    Takahashi Rumiko made beats! DON, taku, DON, taku. . .
  36. Just Fabulous by Francis · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have enough trouble with finding my remote.

    Now I can lose my keyboard, mouse, monitor and CPU. This is definately progress.

    --

    --
    #include <malloc.h>
    free(your.mind);
    1. Re:Just Fabulous by markmoss · · Score: 2

      Easy. First, if you lose the monitor, it's _way_ too small. So you put a buzzer in all the other pieces, and a button on the monitor to activate those buzzers.

      It's a little harder with your remote, because it doesn't have any kind of receiver on it. But with Bluetooth devices, they'll receive the signal as long as you don't close them into the metal filing cabinet. 8-)

  37. I just built one PC... by aralin · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Hi, I just built one PC, not yet in store type, pretty cheap so I thought I would share here so everyone could get it.

    • MB: MSI K7T266A Pro2-RU
    • CPU: AMD Athlon XP 1600
    • MEM: 512 Mb DDR 2100
    • Bundle: The above with fan and burn-in and shipping from Access Micro for $399
    • ATI Radeon All-in-Wonder DDR 32Mb ($119 Best Buy)
    • SB Audigy Mp3 ($99 Best Buy)
    • 300W case, ($70 Fry's)
    • 60Gb HDD Maxtor 7200 rpm ($129 Fry's)
    • HP CD-RW 9100i ($69 Fry's)
    • FDD, Netcard, Cables, CD-R media ($50 Fry's)


    Together its about $950 without monitor. It runs completely on 266Mhz bus (DDR) and outperforms your common 2Ghz P4 with SDR bus thats shipped all over as latest greatest.

    It has 4xUSB 2.0, 4xUSB 1.1 and 1x IEEE1394 (firewire). And also other standard ports. Dolby Digital Surround sound is also neat and the thing just rocks. And under $1000.

    --
    If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
  38. Sweet PC? Bah! by ddillman · · Score: 2, Informative

    Did you actually look at the thing? Sure, some of the gadgets are interesting, but the way they've put it together isn't what I'd call sweet.

    Expandability? None, internally, to speak of. So that means loads of things hanging out on FireWire or USB cables. Wanna upgrade? Better call HP, as I'm sure this thing screams 'proprietary case design' for the thermal management they mention, let alone that's generally how HP works. Add that DVD-ROM? External, please. CD-RW? Same thing. Hard drive? Replace the existing, while juggling your data, because there isn't space for a second one.

    They mention XP pretty prominently, but I doubt seriously it will run Linux out of the box. They mention the Intel Pentium 4 a LOT. But I can get more bang for the buck with an Athlon. Option for that? Not that I could find...

    All in all, the whole thing looked like a commercial for Intel, not a sweet concept PC.

    --
    Little girls, like butterflies, need no excuse. -- L. Long
  39. Intel and HP by rsimmons · · Score: 1

    Intel has a page about this Concept PC. It is not slashdoted like the main link :)

  40. There is a cable by gerardrj · · Score: 1

    I saw this system on TechTVs week in review. The system box is tethered to the display unit by a cable up to 200ft long. The Box contains the HD, processor, display card, etc. The flat panel display contains the CD/DVD drive, camera and a speaker.
    The mouse and keyboard are the only wireless parts of the system.
    According to dinky Jim Lauderback, HP claims you'll only need to change the dispaly component every 5-6 yeats, and the system box every 2-3 years.

    --
    Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  41. /.ed by daaboo · · Score: 1

    /.-ed again :(

  42. Today on Sesame Street by -benjy · · Score: 1

    Today's PC is brought to you by the number 17 and the letters N, S, and A. Tune in tomorrow when we show you how to get rid of that annoying aluminum foil wrapped around your head.

  43. wireless keyboards/mouse-- is it just me? by eh2o · · Score: 1

    I use a logitech wireless keyboard and mouse... is it just me or is this technology still a little immature? Once every few weeks things go on the "fritz" -- the mouse stops responding or the keyboard acts really weird -- radio interference?? I'm only 3 feet from the transmitter... its nice to have no wires but when the keyboard malfunctions its -really- annoying.

    1. Re:wireless keyboards/mouse-- is it just me? by glwtta · · Score: 1

      it's just you.

      no, seriously.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
  44. I want to see! by Captain+Pooh · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Warning: User designtechnica@localhost has already more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in /home/www/designtechnica/mainfile.php on line 42

    Warning: MySQL Connection Failed: User designtechnica@localhost has already more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in /home/www/designtechnica/mainfile.php on line 42
    Unable to select database

    I want to see line 42. Right now I refreshing the page.

  45. I think you'd object... by Haeleth · · Score: 1

    ...if you owned such a system. I'd be willing to bet that you'd rather buy a GeForce 3 AGP card for $100 (yeah, I'm dreaming) than a GeForce 3 module for $300, right?

    Profitable indeed, if they could only persuade people it was worth it.

    Besides, how difficult is it really to swap parts of a PC? Sure, still too complicated for the average user, but at least these days we have PnP, IDE autodetection, and so on...

    1. Re:I think you'd object... by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      ...if you owned such a system. I'd be willing to bet that you'd rather buy a GeForce 3 AGP card for $100 (yeah, I'm dreaming) than a GeForce 3 module for $300, right?

      if you bought such a GeForce3 for $170 and as a home user could install it yourself w/o having worries of that nasty 'static bug' or the likes, without going to compUSA and having them install it for 50$, worry that they're going through all your personal files, loading porn on to it or somthing, yeah, i'd think consumers would pay the 20$ premium to be able to unwrap it and plug it in like a game cartridge.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    2. Re:I think you'd object... by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      err... that is a GeForce3 @ 170$ [modular](instead of costing 300$), as opposed to the standard @ 100$

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
  46. HP Logo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would it kill you to add an HP Logo?

    There's at least 1 HP story a month and quite a few in recent months with the whole layoff/merger/calculator thing. They always manage to pick some other logo, last week it was the Compaq one...

  47. Re:Sweet PC? Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot is such hypocrites. It is running on Windows 2000 and IIS, masked to give out "fake" responses saying it is Linux/Apache.

    Paying lip service to a bunch of freeloaders while running on a stable 21st century OS is pretty hyprocritical. Come on, come out of the closet already.

    the cat is out of the bag

  48. I liked it better... by Gropo · · Score: 0

    Back when it was called the Apple G4 Cube... <br>Except that the cube needed no CPU fan... And was designed by people with talent. Hmm...<br><br>

    On top of that.. The non-symmetric monitor would make my head explode after 2 hours of usage. Not too sure about the 60's era TV throwback industrial design thing either...<br><br>

    summary: leave the innovative industrial design to Apple and keep to making those hideous grey or beige boxes, HP...<br>

    --
    I hate Grammar Nazi's
    1. Re:I liked it better... by Gropo · · Score: 1

      wtf!?! I had no TT hypertext in there goddamit! Why isnt it reading my freaking BR's as HTML!?! freaks!

      --
      I hate Grammar Nazi's
    2. Re:I liked it better... by bytes256 · · Score: 1

      you might wanna try the HTML Formatted option next time...DUH!

      --

      Slashdot, the site where everything's made up and the points don't matter
    3. Re:I liked it better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And here I was thinking you were just really cold.

  49. Behold the power of banner ads and Javshit! by Tackhead · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    From http://www.designtechnica.com/article.php?sid=689& mode=thread&order=1

    Funny, I did the same thing because the page didn't even bother trying to render in my browser. So I saved the HTML and read the article in "vi". Or rather, I saved the HTML and spent 30 seconds trying to find the damn article.

    1) SaveAs article.html. Cut-and-paste only the HTML that includes the article text and image HREFs.

    2) SaveAs articleraw.html. Cut out the user comments, leaving the original HTML intact.

    3) $ wc article*.*
    44 381 2473 article.html
    482 1742 22916 articleraw.html

    Geez, a 10:1 ratio of Javashit and other dreck to actual content, and that's without loading graphics.

    The sick thing is that I know that's not a record for waste.

  50. Every time???? by volpe · · Score: 2


    Maybe someone can beam the power into the machine with lasers or something, but I wouldn't want to have to reboot every time a cat runs under the desk!


    Every time? I suspect each cat would only be able to do this once. How many cats do you have?

    1. Re:Every time???? by 4of12 · · Score: 2

      Every time? I suspect each cat would only be able to do this once. How many cats do you have?

      Heh. I dunno 'bout you, but I always have V cats running under mine!

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    2. Re:Every time???? by akc · · Score: 1
      Every time? I suspect each cat would only be able to do this once.

      Don't you get nine goes at this?

  51. lousy for gamers, right? by Bogatyr · · Score: 1

    Isn't the latency for wireless bad enough it's noticable for fast-twitch gaming such as Unreal/Quake and relatives?

  52. You're overlooking something... by KC7GR · · Score: 1

    Any sort of RF-based wireless hardware bears a much greater risk of interfering with, or getting interference from, ham radio equipment, cordless phones, and other RF devices nearby.

    Given this, wireless accessories make a lot less sense if you're also an amateur radio op, especially if you're operating on the UHF and microwave bands required for things like satcomm and moonbounce/EME communications.

    The endless hype surrounding wireless devices really makes me wonder how long it's going to be before someone starts playing with their RF-based wireless keyboard, and their typing ends up on their neighbor's PC or something equally annoying.

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

  53. Cost! What about cost? by imrdkl · · Score: 2
    From the article: "Most of us can assume the same prices for most store bought computers, with a little added cost for an LCD screen"

    Perhaps Bluetooth connectivity is an add-on then? I have trouble believing this. HP make good hardware, and they charge a bundle for it. Thats the way it's always been. Even if it does have an intel heart-replacement.

  54. Legacy stuff by morbid · · Score: 0

    The question is, does it still have a 16-bit BIOS, AT hardware interrupts and a funky A20 line on the processor?

    :-)

    --
    I'm out of my tree just now but please feel free to leave a banana.
  55. HP? ugh. by vsync64 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'm sorry, but I discounted this story as soon as I read the words "developed by HP". Any PC developed and/or marketed by HP is almost guaranteed to be garbage, thanks to the pathetic quality control and design at HP.

    HP doesn't really even deserve their name anymore. Hewlett and Packard are both dead. All the cool scientific goodies have been spun off into Agilent. HP just killed off ACO after insulting their loyal user community with the 49G. And Carly Fiorina (can you look at her picture and honestly say that she doesn't look like a vulture?) is gleefully turning the remnants of HP into yet another Microsoft whore.

    Their printers are the only tolerable product they're still producing, and I hear Epson is rapidly catching up. I have had the worst luck with HP's computer systems, both with the Kayak (their "high-end workstation" that I used at a previous job) and with various Pavilions that I have tried to fix/upgrade for people (oh, and their tech support is useless; try calling and asking what Ethernet card they have inside: "oh, that would be a `10/100' card, sir").

    HP has a training program wherein you can get significant discounts on their products if you take online classes. I guess the idea is that retailers will be more eager to sell HP if they have 1) gotten free stuff from HP, and 2) know lots about HP products. Well, the HP PhotoSmart 612 which I got at a nice discount is of horrible quality. The camera design itself is actually pretty decent, but I had to go through 5 cameras before I found 1 without significant CCD defects. What I can tell you from my extensive HP training is this: Don't buy HP, kids. They suck.

    --
    TO BUY A NEW CAR WOULD MAKE YOU SEXUALLY ATTRACTIVE.
  56. Wireless keyboards and mice aren't good for gaming by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 1

    Or at least in my experiences they haven't been.
    Has anyone else found a wireless keyboard that works okay under games? Seems like the keys don't register as often or quick enough.

    I can't remember the model I was using. It had a touchpad built in.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  57. Buy a G4 tower then :P by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Seriously, if you're advocating simple to upgrade PCs.

    Pull a latch and the side of the G4 pops open. Drives sit on the bottom and are connected to a ribbon cable. CPU sits on an easily upgradable daughtercard (or maybe it's in a ZIF socket by now, I own a Titanium Laptop), ram is easily accessable, and all the PCI slots are trivially available because the motherboard lies on the hinged door.

    The problem? Most PC buyers don't want to *pay* for the ability to easily tinker with their PC, instead placing higher value on performance and price, leaving design innovation, power consumption, and noise pollution as casualties of their budgets.

    1. Re:Buy a G4 tower then :P by Telek · · Score: 2

      yeah, so?

      take a Dell case, lie it sideways, the case is hinged so it's easy to open, and in front of you are the hard drives and the cdrom drives, angled out at you because they're on the hinged part. unplug power and ribbon, use the easy tabbed sliders that are a sinch to remove (and install on another drive because of the way that they clip into the screw holes instead of actually screwing in), put on new drive, replace, reattach, done. entire endeavour : 30s.

      Or for any normal computer, remove side conver, disconnect, unscrew, remove drive, replace, rescrew, reattach, replace side cover. this is not brain surgery folks. total time : 60s.

      the only way to make it easier is to have actual slots where the drives themselves just slide in and out of, so you don't need to screw around with any wires, but you can also get those, unfortunately they are a bit more expensive.

      the reason why things are the way they are is because (drumroll please) ... there is no big demand for it to change.

      Dell has the cases setup the way that they do because their primary customers are businesses (well, these are business cases I'm talking about anyways), and they will have IT departments that are more likely to screw around with the insides and want easy access to things than your mom&pop home users. Most people still refer to their computer chassis as the "CPU" or the "hard drive", and they think it's just a magical box. they couldn't care, and really don't know about what's inside of it, thus there is no demand to create a modularized system. It is cheaper to not, thus things aren't modularized.

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
    2. Re:Buy a G4 tower then :P by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      Heck, that machine really wasn't all that impressive, compared to a G4 with a nice Apple Cinema Display.

      The box might be a little smaller, but you can get wireless peripherals and the other nine yards. Compared to a beige box, this HP thing seems pretty slick, compared to my Mac, it's, well, blue.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    3. Re:Buy a G4 tower then :P by skt · · Score: 1
      I would have to disagree with you as it sounds like you are describing the new Dell Dimention 4300 case. I really hate that thing to be quite honest. I prefer something normal (and higher quality) like the Enlight 7230 which is quite good for a midtower. It uses 5.25" drives on rails so that your cd-rom drive, for example, isn't bolted to the side of the case. It has a much more modular feel. But again you have to unplug the power and ribbon cable, but that doesn't take very long. Both cases have enough room so that it's not that big of a deal..

      Unfortuntely I can't buy those from Dell and thus am stuck with the new 4300 design. I really don't like the rounded look of the 4300 case. The floppy discs are difficult to retrieve because of the recessed floppy drive. The black components really bug me because I have an office filled with spare white components! Even though I don't care what the computer looks like, the users seem to care.. They get upset when I replace their broken black Intellimouse with a standard white one from M$. Of course all Dell cases (including the 4100 series) feel cheap to me since the outside panels are made of plastic rather than metal.

    4. Re:Buy a G4 tower then :P by Telek · · Score: 2

      Dunno, I got a Optiplex 150 here and the case is great... I agree with you about the recessed floppy (the recessed WHAT?) being a pain, but I hardly ever use it so it really doesn't matter.

      everything inside is on "rails" if you would like to call them, and don't need screws even to attach to the rails, so it's very quick and easy to swap stuff around.

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
    5. Re:Buy a G4 tower then :P by GregWebb · · Score: 2

      We were really surprised at work a little while ago. Bought a cheap midi tower case and it worked pretty much like that! Higed out from the side via a small latch. Really nice to work in.

      Drives were then mounted via a system of clips and thumbscrews (could be fitted _so_ easily_) while there was a 3.5" bay for the HDD pointing to the side - which meant that the rear you need to get at was pointing straight out at the hole where the side had hinged down and the motherboard.

      Of course, being a cheap case, details were missing. IDE cables fitted when it was out but were tight, but some bright spark hadn't remembered to include a power cable extension, so that stops it with about 30 degrees to go until you remove it. Still, it's a start.

      --

      Greg

      (Inside a nuclear plant)
      Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

    6. Re:Buy a G4 tower then :P by Yarn · · Score: 2

      ribbon cables? BAH

      Find an old IBM PS/2, you can take the whole thing apart and reassemble it in 60s, including bootup times.

      Everything is clipped into a casing structure and connects by solid edge connectors, even things like the fans.

      They don't make em like they used to

      --
      -Yarn - Rio Karma: Excellent
  58. More of the same. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although I may be a lowly AC, I -do- have to comment on this.

    What is to get excited about? Concept PC? Concept of what? It's all more of the same---same centralized ram-it-all-through-the-CPU architecture running on the Nth generation 8086 derivative. There's nothing new about that at all. All else is fluff--bluetooth? Wireless? Whoop-de-do. This is nothing I couldn't assemble myself.

    What -I- want is something new. JUNK the PC architecture entirely---start over with something new. Geeze, when was the last time anyone tried that? The BeBox perhaps? And no thanks to the Dual Monopolies (TM) of Intel and Microsoft, it died before it hit the streets. No one can afford to try something new with Microsoft and Intel around.

    Now before I wax nostalgic about the Amiga, all I will say is this: at least they tried a totally new approach to computer hardware. With the lamentable rise of the IBM PC clone we've been walking in lock-step with a braindead design.

    *sigh* at least we have the Apple machines...they aren't revolutionary but at least they're -different-.

  59. Only one problem... by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2

    It seems that the only consumers willing to pay for design considerations are Apple customers.

    Fanless design, low power design, ease of accessability, ease of maintainance, CPUs on daughtercards, Firewire and USB, easy to access ram, easy to open cases, are all part of the G4 Tower and the G4 laptop.

    The majority of PC buyers would rather put up with more noise pollution, cramped and difficult to maintain cases, spaghetti cables, and heat than pay for the design and manufacture of concept PCs.

    1. Re:Only one problem... by victim · · Score: 5, Insightful
      First off, design is cheap. Divide design cost by 1,000,000 computers and it vanishes. Second, problem is that PCs are designed. They are designed to minimize production costs while still being marketable. When people say paying for design they frequently mean paying for better usability, longevity, or aesthetics at the expense of low cost.

      This can't be the product of a serious HP design effort...

      Look at the pictures again and consider ergonomics.
      • In the first picture (tall skinny) your right knee is going to be bashing into the CPU.
      • In the second picture the helpful model has turned to face his cpu box which has no user interface funcations at all and will be twisting his head to the right all day to see the monitor.
      • 3rd picture, not enough context to tell. Looks like it is back in knee bash position. Why is this cpu box taking up my desk? The CD is in the screen after all.

      Now let's talk design. Just because this is different from the 20 year old PC form factor doesn't make it `designed'. Look at the display. Why is only 50% of the object's area useful display? Why is there a big handle on the bottom of it? I suspect it serves some other function, but it looks like a handle to me. Maybe I can hang my keyboard on the monitor handle? And no patententing the keyboard hanger HP, thats my idea.

      I suspect we are not looking at a design effort, but rather some engineers were tasked to show what a bluetooth maximized PC would look like and produced a minimal vision.

      Questions for future consideration...
      • Why isn't their a bluetooth headset there. Integrate my music grade headphones, my voice control mic, and my telephone. Give me voice dialing while you are at it.
      • Why isn't my PDA sitting there syncing through the bluetooth? Aren't we trying to sell a vision? show me!
      • Why am I looking at the same old cubical design? You just took away 16" of monitor depth yet you are showing me a cube designed with a corner desk to hold deep monitors. This monitor is incompatible with corner desks! Revisit that. Shrink the cube or use the space. $20/sqft/year. Use it or lose it.
      • I don't want to hassle with batteries. My freaking electric toothbrush charges inductively by sitting on a special base. Wacom powers their pointers and mice by wireless power transfer. Give me a little power mat I can place my keyboard an mouse on that will charge them. Make sure their battery can go a couple of days so I can forget once in a while, but let them recharge when idle. Consider solar power. It works for calculators in offices. Do my headset too while you are at it.
      • Where is my video conferencing camera? Stick it in my display like a little pointable eyeball. you've got enough room! and give me a little shutter I can flip over it so I don't feel watched all the time. maybe one of those round things in the display is a camera and one is a speaker?
    2. Re:Only one problem... by Oniros · · Score: 2

      Integrating tons of features (camera, DVD drive, etc.) in the display might seem cool, but what if one of those parts break? You need to make do without your screen, uncool.

      Plus the costs of having the DVD drive, etc. in the monitor will drive price probably way up.

      Of course if you are going the integration way, why stop halfway? why not have the whole PC inside the display... wooops we get the long rumored LCD iMac, don't we? :) (as for the people wanting extra PCI cards or ATA devices, there are external firewire ATA bridge/enclosure and PCI chassis... of course, it drives the price up.)

    3. Re:Only one problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      design is cheap. Divide design cost by 1,000,000 computers and it vanishes

      Not really. From a manager's point of view $3/PC x 1M PCs is $3M. $3M is his bonus and the bonus of his entire department.

    4. Re:Only one problem... by Rosmo · · Score: 1

      Are you sure Wacom uses wireless power transfer? I've never heard of such thing.

  60. Re:Sweet PC? Bah! by chinton · · Score: 2
    All in all, the whole thing looked like a commercial for Intel, not a sweet concept PC.

    Gee, who did the article say was teaming up with HP to make this thing? Let me check... Oh, yeah, there it is: Intel! What they hell are they doing?!?!? Intel shouldn't waste their money promoting their own products... They should be getting together with HP and developing a product built around AMD chips... Sheesh.

    As for the expandability of the thing -- read the first line:

    Equipped in their concept PC.

    Concept widgets generally never make it to the public as is... Oh, look, it says so right here:

    Will we see these new PC's on shelves soon? Not likely..

    If you are looking at something other than the link in the article, I am sorry, please post a link, but the way I read the article this is nothing more than what they call it: A Concept PC.

  61. link to non-slashdotted page by tkolich62 · · Score: 2, Informative

    here's a link to Intel's version of the page...the other link i saw only took me to www.intel.com, lotta good that did...

  62. That was indeed a great concept in 1997 by 90XDoubleSide · · Score: 1
    "The system box is tethered to the display unit by a cable up to 200ft long. The Box contains the HD, processor, display card, etc. The flat panel display contains the CD/DVD drive, camera and a speaker."

    This is exactly the same concept Apple implemented in the 20th Anniversary Mac in 1997, and they actually sold the thing! It had a box on the floor for the power supply and subwoofer to complement its Bose sound system (where is the audio on this box?), and it thethered to a flat monitor that integrated the motherboard, CD drive, and speakers. The concept of placing the power supply outside the enclosure to save space and increase cooling efficeincy was used again in the Cube. The wireless keyboard and mouse are also very old news; if you wanted them you would have bought them months ago.

    "Will we see these new PC's on shelves soon? Not likely"

    Yes, the fact that HP is far too safe/non-innovative (they weren't always that way, either) a company to actually introduce it makes this even more of a non-event.

    But I suppose we are resigned to see another box shop make some half-assed copy of an Apple idea and be lauded by the technologically-illiterate press once again.

    --
    "Reality is just a convenient measure of complexity" -Alvy Ray Smith
    1. Re:That was indeed a great concept in 1997 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot is such hypocrites. It is running on Windows 2000 and IIS, masked to give out "fake" responses saying it is Linux/Apache.

      Paying lip service to a bunch of freeloaders while running on a stable 21st century OS is pretty hyprocritical. Come on, come out of the closet already.

      the cat is out of the bag

    2. Re:That was indeed a great concept in 1997 by x136 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact (ok, opinion) that the TAM was -- and still is -- much more attractive than this thing.

      --
      SIGFEH
  63. More info from HP and Intel by kingdon · · Score: 1

    There is more information from the (non-slashdotted) Intel site. The thing at the side of the monitor is indeed a CD player (CD writer, even).

    For comparison, look at the Concept PC 2000 (also known as "deep forest") from HP and Intel sites. Both designs feature a small case. The most advanced feature of the 2000 design is that the side of the case has a translucent panel so that you can use the PC as a picture frame (for those who don't have enough room for their pr0n). But the lack of PCI slots seems like a pretty big limitation (if USB were faster and had more peripherals, maybe that wouldn't be such a big deal and I suppose for many uses it still isn't a big deal, but I'm not sure I'm quite willing to consign PCI to the "legacy" category yet).

  64. Bigger is better! by oconnorcjo · · Score: 2

    I could never get into the whole small pc thing. Every time I have to fiddle with small case computers, I have visions of hell turned loose. To me a "sweet computer" is one in which everything is easily upgradable and insertable. On my last computer, I replaced every component except the actual case (which I am also planning to do soon with an addtronics 7896 case). This thing is just begging to be outdated before it is even fashionable due to when the next cool graphics card comes out or when 600X cd roms are all the minimum on games or even just to upgrade ram.

    --
    I miss the Karma Whores.
  65. Wireless PC, whats the point? by snoozerdss · · Score: 1

    Ok now, I'm not talking about laptops. I'm talking about this wireless (home)PC. Really, whats the point? once you throw printers, speakers, internet (phone line or cable modem) digital cameras and whatever other nifty toy's people have for there PC's these days your still going to have wires sticking out all over the place so really it's not a big deal since you can already go buy a wireless keyboard and mouse. And who needs to move their home pc around that much? isin't that what laptops are for?

    --
    Snoozer.
  66. What's so special about it? by Vess+V. · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... besides the matching cute exteriors of the devices? We already have the "concept" of wireless mice and keyboards. Besides, why the hell would anyone want a wireless mouse, with its horriffic refresh rate?

    1. Re:What's so special about it? by glwtta · · Score: 1

      why the hell would anyone want a wireless mouse, with its horriffic refresh rate

      Because it's convinient and much nicer to user? I don't know much about mouse refresh rates, but it hasn't bothered me much - I point and klick at stuff, stuff gets pointed and clicked at. (though I am sure you have different criteria if you are a l33t fr4}{0r)

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    2. Re:What's so special about it? by Vess+V. · · Score: 1

      Looking at a mouse cursor jump around the screen and waiting for it to catch up to where it should be isn't my idea of convenience.

      Sounds to me like you need to get a nice corded mouse (preferably optical), bump up the refresh rate with ps2rate, sit back, and enjoy the difference. Trust me, you'll like it. Give it a try.

    3. Re:What's so special about it? by glwtta · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me like you need to get yourself a decent IR mouse, I've never seen mine jump or have to catch up.

      I've used a good corded mouse for a long time, and "sit back" is precisely what I can NOT do with it ;)

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    4. Re:What's so special about it? by glwtta · · Score: 1

      oops, I meant RF, not IR...

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
  67. Supplemental Link by theluckman · · Score: 1
    HERE is a link to a comparable article from Intel, since the main one got slashdotted.

    --
    luckman
    I don't involve myself with flames, much less know how to bait one.
  68. can't wait to sniff this one by wigger · · Score: 0

    imagine how fun it would be to see everything your neighbor does and sees!!

    my neighbor is big into porn, now i can get all i want for free!! only problem is he's a homo.

  69. "New concept"??? by Srsen · · Score: 1

    "The new concept is that of wireless keyboard and mouse, and an 18" flat screen LCD monitor to top things off."

    Oh, yeah, I've never heard of any of those things before. What a concept! They're still on the ol' cutting edge there at HP.

  70. Re:p4! wow! by slugfro · · Score: 1

    Maybe, just maybe, it is becuase this concept PC was co-developed my Intel and HP.

    --

    -- Find the Truth...
  71. Blind solution - advantage of RF wireless over IR by Mandelbrute · · Score: 2
    There's a blind guy I know that has a radio frequency wireless keyboard and has his PC sound output going to a short range FM transmitter (the sort that is used to listen to a portable CD player on a car radio). He walks around the house with his keyboard and headphones while his computer reads out the contents of web pages.


    For those of us that can see and need to be in the same room as the monitor, the range and less dependance on direction or line of sight of RF over infra-red is an advantage. For example, my IR mouse can't quite make it from the lounge to the top of the TV set, so the sensor has to sit on an object at the same height as the mouse about a metre in front of the TV.


    One possibility, which I don't think has a commercial solution yet, is to connect a transmitter to the RF-out on a video card, have it tuned to a spare channel and use TV sets wherever you go as monitors. The frequencies for TV are at the top end of the MHz range, so a very similar piece of equipment to the small, low power FM transmitters should do to job. Picture quality will not be fantastic due to NTSC (not the same colour twice) and PAL limitations. For those of us with one TV a cable would be better.

  72. what's the point? by glwtta · · Score: 1

    of a wireless monitor? I am gonna assume that it still has a power cable, so it's not really "wireless" anyway, and seems like a cable between your stationary monitor and your stationary PC won't really get in the way much.

    I do love my RF keyboard and mouse though - but I never did realize how "conceptual" and "cutting edge" they are.

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  73. You want to move the tower into a closet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since the CPU case is for the most part not a human interface device and since it is the only one producing irritating white noise, wireless interfaces make it possible to move the noise into a closet, air-conditioned box in the garage, attic or neighbor's guest house.

  74. Wireless everything by MrEd · · Score: 1
    So, assuming this thing has a wireless monitor, doesn't this mean that now a moderately bright hacker with an aerial and a laptop can not only read my keystrokes and mouse movement, but my screen display too?


    Luuvely! With a strong enough transmitter I bet you could overpower the base unit... AYBABTU!

    --

    Wah!

    1. Re:Wireless everything by glwtta · · Score: 1

      fortunately most "hackers" are dumbass script-kiddies, so "moderatley bright" is pretty rare.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
  75. I hate to disappoint anyone... by flegged · · Score: 1

    ...but I've already got one!

    When I bought my computer two years ago, it was a Cyrix with a PCChips motherboard and a 14" VGA monitor. Now only the case remains.

    RF keyboard + mouse, 15.1" Sony flat screen, 1.1GHz thunderbird, a GeForce 3 Titanium and vast rolling expanses of RAM.

    And all for about 1/3rd of the likely price of this thing. I'm just a little upset that that TBird is almost obsolete already! Now twin 2GHz Athlons - that would be droolworthy.

    --

    "I think he was truly surprised at how little I cared about how big a market the Mac had" - Linus on Jobs
    1. Re:I hate to disappoint anyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude Athlons are seriously overpriced at dabs.com.
      You can get 1.1 for $80 here in US.

  76. coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I love the wireless cup of coffee that is featured in most of the pictures of this new comp. what would ever get done without coffee? obviously nothing.

  77. I must be missing something... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So basically, it's a small footprint PC case (BookPC), a flat panel display (hundreds to choose from), a wireless keyboard/mouse setup (dozens to choose from)...and that's it.

    Hell, if that's a concept PC, I'll take my modified Biostar Sunflower to Comdex next year. Or my i-opener! Yeah, that's the ticket. That'll blow them away. Computer and flat-panel display IN THE SAME BOX!!!

    And why would I want wireless input peripherals in an office environment (as they seem to be hinting at in the photos)? Anything that isn't tied down disappears. No more handing out $10 replacements when someone spills coffee on the keyboard or steps on their mouse.

  78. way too clean by Dugh+Daren · · Score: 1

    i've never ever seen any techie's desk so clean. in a matter of hours questions like "where the hell is my mouse!" and "who put the keyboard on the shelf?" and "who put this picture of spock on my monitor!" would come screaming out of the cubicle/office space. sometimes i think the cables are necessary just so we don't lose the components, and the size so they dominate the desk full of clutter...

  79. RF keyboards? Not in a cube farm... by djrogers · · Score: 2

    I can just see it now - 100 keyboards and mice within earshot of each other - that's 200 xmitters and 100 recivers. Can anyone say RF pollution?

    --
    Think outside the... Hey, where'd the friggin' box go?
  80. Broadcast power by Mandelbrute · · Score: 2
    Didn't Nikola Tesla do something like this? I rember reading about a lamp that had no cords that the power went thru the air some sorta wireless that was safe.
    He did. It's now called radio (he was eventually granted the patent). His experiments showed that it was incredibly inefficient as a method of getting electricity form one point to another along way off, but you don't find out until you try. I think transformers came out of that research.

    As for it being safe, large amounts of RF radiation will turn you into a crispy critter.

    All of the earth return work he did also looked very weird - apparantly he planted a light bulb in the ground near an AC generator and it lit up.

    He has a reputation for being a crackpot, which mostly came from Edison calling him names over the DC (Edison) vs AC (Tesla) debate, and from a few psuedo-documentaties that came out in the 1970's (you know the sort- "What are these mysterious roads into the sea, are they proof that Easter Island was once part of Atlantis?" when twenty years before someone with scuba gear has proved that they were BOAT RAMPS!). All of those pencil sketches that are shown things like airships generating power by the potential difference in the atmosphere and broadcasting it were never published (that's why they are in pencil), and just get dragged out when someone wants to make Tesla the pin-up boy of the conspiricy theorists.

  81. Not impressed... by ghostis · · Score: 1

    This a concept pc? More like a pc that is somewhat non legacy and has wireless components. As others have noted: great, I can lose my keyboard and mouse too. Fundamentally though it is still within the same monitor-keyboard-mouse-cpubox paradigm defined at Xerox PARC. Cept it has things in different positions and fewer wires. Why a cpu-box? I thought LCDs don't generate that much heat, so why not, at very least, increase the leg-room, deskspace, whatever and combine the cpu-box and monitor. Things can certainly be made light enough; we have laptops after all. Also why no creativity from the industry leaders in the interaction dept. I have always wanted to do something like combining an expresso pc (see arstechnica.com) with a head mounted display. Maybe even throw in vr gloves and software that virtualizes the standard interfaces (keyboard, pointer) and adds new ones. This is the same old thing with prettier chrome.

    -ghostis

    --


    Computer Science is all about trying to find the right wrench to bang in the right screw. -T.Cumbo?
    1. Re:Not impressed... by Eccles · · Score: 2

      why not, at very least, increase the leg-room, deskspace, whatever and combine the cpu-box and monitor.

      One reason not to is so you can upgrade those components separately. Their assumption is that you upgrade monitors less frequently than systems.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  82. Mouse Chains! by yuri · · Score: 1

    Maybe someone should go into business making chains for these wireless devices. "Always losing you mouse, why not securely chain it to your keyboard so you never have to look for it again." Probably should make the chain look like a normal mouse cord.

    People might steal the keyboards so better chain them to.

    People who buy more than one of these might forget which computer is which monitor, so we better have a chain (again styled like a cord) to connect the wireless screen to the computer.

  83. More cool PC concepts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Alternative Laptop Gallery Lots of cool images!!

  84. not for anyone here it seems by glwtta · · Score: 1

    "The computing element measures 4.5"H x 12.8"W x 14.8"D and contains sealed and secure devices to offer increased control for information technology managers"

    First off it seems the real innovation here is the new marketing BS - "My computer doesn't have a CPU, it has a Computing Element!"

    "Sealed and secure device" - as in, "you can't fuck with them"? By the gods, what's the point then!!??

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  85. Re:RF keyboards? Not in a cube farm... by glwtta · · Score: 1

    yeah, and in a cube the farthest your keyboard can be from the receiver is about 4cm, so it kinda looses the whole idea.

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  86. Looks nice but... by Barahir · · Score: 1

    Is it secure? I don't know much about Bluetooth, so I couldn't say. But I don't want to be transmitting my keystrokes in cleartext over RF. Somebody probably already mentioned this, but I couldn't find the thread...

  87. that's the POINT by glwtta · · Score: 1

    Still to this day, upgrading a hard drive or a graphics card is an unnecesarily obfuscated process, requiring the PC guts to be cracked open and laid out on the kitchen table.

    If upgrading hardware was quick and simple - what would be the fun in it?

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  88. Intel marketing has been getting on my tits... by glwtta · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ever since the P4:

    "'Concept PC 2001' uses the power of the Intel® Pentium® 4 processor platform for future PC innovation."

    What does that sentence MEAN?? How can a computer (even a Concept PC) use a platform to achieve future innovation?? Or is it just using a platform that's itself is a platform for future innovation? In that case, since when is a proccessor a platform for innovation? And lastly, what the hell does "platform for future PC innovation" mean in the first place???

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  89. Just noticed it has the CD drive in the monitor by glwtta · · Score: 1

    uhh... are my Kendwood 72X, Plextor 24X and Asus DVD all gonna fit in there?

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  90. Problems with induction by Ian+Peon · · Score: 1
    Inductive charging could be cool, until you dropped a floppy on your keyboard mat.


    I have yet to see a good fixed wireless power solution for a PC that doesn't potentially kill the user or his stuff. Yes, the fuel cells look promising, but recharging your keyboard/ mouse/ monitor(?) with a cartridge every few months may end up being too much hassle.

    1. Re:Problems with induction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I'm assuming you use a Zip disk for transfer? What about click-of-death? The damn disks die.

      Bootable CD's? What if your bootable CD is scratched and doesnt work anymore? CD's are fragile.

      Bootable network? What if your nic dies (and your EEPROM with it) and you have to replace it - and dont have new drivers for it?

      Floppies are pretty much the only reliable storage left for single-computer homes and ANYWHERE that something might get messed up. Sure, maybe you may have some ability to keep things new and working perfectly but I know at my cubefarm we seem to tear things up a bit - our life is a bit hectic. But I've never had a floppy go bad. Numerous Windows and Linux boot/install CD's have died (due to Dell's cd-roms spinning disks off-center).

      Don't think that everyone is stuck in the past; you're the one using a costly and horrible-to-upgrade machine (although you may be running linux on it).

    2. Re:Problems with induction by Xylantiel · · Score: 1

      I never thought I'd hear someone champion floppies for their RELIABILITY. I've had so many floppies go bad in my presence it's insane. Ever tried to do a linux install of base system from floppies without a brand-new box of disks, easily 1 in 5 + is toast. Just cause the whole disk has to actually work. (imagine that.) I have completely given up on floppies, the network is the only robust way to move data from place to place. (and maybe a laptop.)

    3. Re:Problems with induction by Suidae · · Score: 1

      Any time i use a floppy, I put the file on three times, using three different names, just to be sure it'll work.

  91. Getting things done? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the Pentium 4. The whole concept is that of a better working environment with the best technology too, but mainly to get the job done. The 2001 Concept PC uses... Better working environment? The dude is still surfing the web and wasting productivity... So much for getting the job done... ;) Now we can goof off without any wires to tangle our coffee cups.

  92. Re:Problems with induction - you barbarian! by victim · · Score: 2

    My god! You still use floppies? I'm sorry, but you can't have a nice modern PC until you can get over that. :-)

    Another example of the dark side of PCs. The inertia for `the way we have always done it' is immense.

    When I got my first iMac I was worried about the no-floppy. It was pointless. I have never wanted a floppy for any mac since then. I still use them on PCs that are too old to boot from CD or net. Got to get linux on there somehow. :-)

  93. Wireless Power by Baldrson · · Score: 3, Interesting
    wireless keyboard, mouse, even a wireless 18" flat screen LCD monitor. The wireless mouse and keyboard run over RF."

    So where's the wireless power?

  94. Real concept PC would be rackmount for home. by deragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My wish for a PC is to be rackmount at home, in the basement. Keyboards, mouses, CDROMs and Monitors are dispersed in the house. Since the CPU is in the basement, the fan noise would not be a problem in the main appartements. Quiet, slick terminals across your home... Imagine...

    Note that rackmount of a 5U unit at least. I want the same upgrade possibilities as I have with my mid tower. The CPU unit does not need to be slim; costs consideration must come before space or even noise (to a limit of course).

    --
    Remember the year 2000? They promised us flying cars. They delivered the PT Cruiser...
  95. Re:What's the point? Wireless Monitor? by rschroeder · · Score: 1

    I don't think the Monitor is acutally wireless, I couldn't find any specific mention oother than on the post above.

    Let's think about the bandwidth required to display 1600x1200 resolution, Bluetooth doesn't come close to hacking it

  96. Innovation abounds! by TheMightyZog · · Score: 2, Funny

    This monitor has effectively increased the surface area that I have to put the stickers from my bananas on by at least 500%. It's going to be a long time before we see another innovation like this from the computer industry.

  97. Re:frist post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try 9th post, buddy. Not to mention that you came in 3 minutes after the first post.

  98. Re:First post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL! You're later than the 10th post, and four minutes off from the original post! Jesus Christ, you fucking eat balls!

  99. Power's the worst wire of all!!and who mods this? by josquint · · Score: 1

    OK.. so i'll lose a karma for flamebait.. but WHO THE HELL MODS THIS!!! -1 Offtopic? WTF That's a poorly used as the 10 -1 Redundants i've got.. and only 3 other comments posted!!

    Anyway. I'd hate to be that cat, with that much power runnin via laser :->
    Microwave might work... but with the same caveat :)

    I do find however that the worst wire to work with is the power wires. Its stiff.. and finding damn OUTLETS!!! i've got WAAAY too many surge strips already!

  100. What's with that monitor? by josquint · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or does that look like my parents old Black and White Zenith TV that got run over by a steam roller.

    Seriously! Wats with the off-center screen, and the knob looking things at the side!! DAMN that's waaay to retro.

    Oh, and BAN the fucker who used all their mod points to -1 Offtopic relevant posts. dumbshit..

  101. LOL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love how someone modded this as offtopic. I've seen posters who didn't bother to read the story or the article, but when a mod does it, it's just sad.

  102. Re:Sweet PC? Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See the picture with the monitor hanging on the cube wall -- this thing has 'corporate' written all over it.

    Expandability? None, internally, to speak of.

    Corporate MIS doesn't generally add cards or internal devices.

    I'm sure this thing screams 'proprietary case design'

    Corporate MIS NEVER wants to upgrade motherboards. Any other objections?

    All in all, the whole thing looked like a commercial for Intel

    Yup, different market than you, hopefully you'll understand that. Still it's been done 100 times already (see iPaq, etc).

  103. $1000 - anything more is $ into Carly's pocket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From pricewatch.com

    $503 17" LCD
    45 wireless keyboard+mouse
    64 32M RADEON
    218 1.5G P4 + MB
    45 512M RAM
    73 40G drive
    8 ATX micro case
    84 WinXP

  104. Same Crap Diffrent Day. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same fluff and junk different approach. You would think with a few years of experience between Intel and HP that they would have come up with something better than commodity hardware that has been trashed with more proprietary hardware.

    I have been working with computers for years, and even teach a computer repair course for an Adult Education program. The thing that torques me off more than anything is that this concept PC is nothing but a scam. Let me see here, I run to my local computer store and buy a NLX box, wireless keyboard and mouse. I get a little jiggy with a soldering iron and mount the RF wireless receiver inside the case. I get me a nifty LCD Monitor, put it in a box with a Laptop/NLX style CDROM... break out the soldering iron again, and make a single nifty cable to go from the "Monitor, Drive" to the NLX Box.

    We are down to 2 cables, 1 for power, one for Monitor...Ohhh wait, how about a 802.11b wireless card. Job is done.

    Now on to the bashing part: They probably spent more than my new house cost on developing this thing. While what they should have been doing is spending less time on fluff and more time on compatibility. Like say, developing a Standards based store bought computer that doesn't consist of a $79 mother board, and the cheapest stuff they can get their hands on, then putting in a Pentium 4 and sell it as gold. Ohhh wait, they could use a FORM FACTOR in a PC... so when they pull a Micron and put a pico fuse on the motherboard connecter, you have to buy a Micron motherboard.

    Wait... Speaking of standards, Pentium 4... different power supply, different memory, marginal performance gains.

    Boils down to pure crap.

  105. Devolution of the Computer Keyboard by Jagasian · · Score: 2
    Judging from the looks of this Concept PC's keyboard and from HP's past keyboards - looks like the trend is continuing. Keyboards are devovling.

    Is it me, or have computer keyboards actually gotten crappier over the years? More keys, buttons, dials, and knobs. Fancy colors, new computer interfaces (USB, IEEE1394, bluetooth). However, the actual performance, functionality, and durability of computer keyboards has gone down hill over the past 10 years. The strange thing is that almost every other aspect of computers has improved significantly over the past 10 years. CPUs are god-like compared to those available 10 years ago. RAM is fast, plentiful, and costs next to nothing. Same goes for harddrives. Video displays have gotten larger, and have better quality.... etc... Hell, even the other major input device, the pointing device has improved (trackpoints, laser and mechanical mice, etc).

    Keyboards on the other hand are degenerating into cheap pieces of crap. They no longer have crisp clean tactile feedback, which makes fast and accurate touch typing possible. Keystrokes often fail to register. Keys stick, and even sometimes fail to press. All in all, the modern keyboard fails at its most basic task: typing.

    Why are keyboards getting worse?
    Here are some of my theories:
    • Most modern GUIs require a pointing device, and in these GUIs, the pointing device has replaced many of the tasks previously accomplished by a keyboard.
    • The average computer consumer isn't very educated about keyboard technology.
    • For many reasons, it is difficult to make a high-tech keyboard a key marketing feature of a new computer.
    • The huge influx of novice computer users within the past 10 years has diluted the market with people that don't know how to type.

    So yeah, this Concept PC looks cool, and I am glad that overall, computer technology is improving, but I wish that the "few steps back" taken in the keyboard technology department didn't have to happen from generation to generation. Of course, some people still make and sell good keyboards with the high quality and durable capacitive aka buckling spring keyswitch technology.
  106. Re:Problems with induction - you barbarian! by Ian+Peon · · Score: 1

    Don't forget the magnetic floppies that are the heart of Zip and LS-120 disks. They'll probably be around for years to come.

  107. Can You Say Apple Cube? I knew that you could. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BFD.
    BTDT.

  108. Have you ever had a good case? by Chirs · · Score: 1

    If you get a decent case, all this becomes simple. Take my case, for instance. Open the side latch and the whole side comes off. Flip a catch and the 5 1/4" drive bay comes out to allow you to screw in drives from both sides. Flip another catch and the floppy bay comes out. Case fans fit into clips, which gets rid of the need for screws. Tons of room, so that you can get at any part of the motherboard.

    Elapsed time to replace any component in the system? A minute, max.

    If that's not fast enough for you, then buy swappable drive bays for your hard drives. It's not hot-swappable, but the drives just slide in and out. Course, you need enough externally accessable 5 1/4" bays.

  109. Re:Problems with induction - hmm by victim · · Score: 2

    It seems we live in worlds too different to even communicate. Allow me to supply more detail...

    Zip - it never entered my mind to use a zip disk. I have no use for cheap, unreliable storge (floppies), I certainly have no use for expensive unreliable storage.

    Bootable CDs - my prefered way to install software. Fragility doesn't matter. I lose them or loan them. I just burn a new one each time I need one.

    Bootable Network - I use this. If my NIC dies I replace it. I'm using Linux on these machines. I do not have a driver issue to deal with. If I did, I would just use a CD or CD-R to tote the driver over.

    Everything is networked. All my valuable data moves around at night using rsync so it is stored on multiple machines. rsync is patient. Most users (image editors aside) don't make enough data that rsync won't catch up in a couple of hours at night, even on a modem.

    You use "floppies" and "reliable" in the same sentence. I'll assume that is a typo. :-)

    You mention me using a costly horrible to upgrade box. I'm not sure what you mean there. I buy my wintel boxes for $400 (cheapest machine at BestBuy) and never upgrade them (ok, I do add RAM initially if I will be running gimp or such on it). The macs I usually buy low end machines on their 'end of model' sale and get a nice price on those as well.

    Other than adding RAM or a new drive now and again I have only upgraded 1 machine in 20 years. I got a clocked doubled P180 for a P90 once. It wasn't really worth it. The rest of the machine was mostly obsolete and the machine just got bus bound. Paying a premium for upgradability is a waste of money in my book. Part of that comes from having multiple computers. I can always just demote all the machine, give away to oldest machine, and buy a new for the machine that needs CPU.

  110. 18" LCD monitor - no way by Animats · · Score: 2
    No way is that monitor 18 inches diagonally. The whole cabinet might be, but the display looks like a 15 inch panel.

    Sony's 18.1" LCD display is available now. Looks better, too.

  111. Van Eck Phreaking by the80y · · Score: 1

    This is an interesting concept and show of technology but very insecure.
    It is currently hard enough to secure current displays and interfaces from determined, well funded snoops(read government, drug cartels, industrial estionage).
    Current wireless keyboards(Logitech) are very easy to intercept from a decent distance.
    You could aquire much more information from a distance if you could watch all input from the office or appartment nextdoor.
    I would hope the display and keyboard would use some sort of encryption.

  112. Air Cooled. by x136 · · Score: 1
    What we don't see often in store bought computers is air flow consideration.
    Yeah, cause you know the iMac has that big honkin' fan hot glued to the back...
    --
    SIGFEH
  113. Does it still have the 1.44MB floppy!! by Qaseem · · Score: 1

    We always hear about the Concept PC's yet they always go back to the 1980's technologies of the floppy, slow serial, slow parallel etc. IR Wireless keyboard and mouse were here more than five years ago and last month I tried one that was very reliable and cheap. Nothing is new here.

    The concept PC of 200X is one that sheds all the bottlenecks of the 80's and 90's. Unfortunately every PC maker talks the talk but does not walk the walk.

    --
    /-\ |-|
  114. Another sad attempt by Quila · · Score: 2

    Yet another sad attempt by a PC designer to make cool, elegant, homogenous looking computer components like Apple. At least this doesn't look as slapped-together and idiotic as earlier HP and Compaq attempts.

    Maybe they'll get it right in several years, just about on track for the general "PC now is Apple 10 years ago" rule.

    Why is it that only Apple seems to be able to pull this off? They couldn't have hired all of the talented industrial designers in the world.

  115. How about this one? by otuz · · Score: 1

    As usual, this HP P4 box is just a ripoff.

    The Twentieth Anniversary Mac was introduced in 1997 and Apple built 12000 of them. It contained a Base unit with power, drives and subwoofer. Just cable one from the base unit to the LCD display which contained a cdrom and the connectors... or check the picture to see it yourself..

  116. Re:and power? - Tesla was successful! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tesla was successful! Haven't you ever seen a Tesla coil? That's wireless power, buddy. It's a little loud and tends to smell like ozone, but Tesla wanted to put one of these on every street corner.

  117. handy overlooked feature.. by calethix · · Score: 1

    Sure it looks neat, but what about the always full coffee mug. That's gotta come in handy for all night coding/gaming.

    On another note, someone mentioned the article on Intel's site but I didn't see a link directly to it so here it is:
    http://www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/releases/20 011113comp_a.htm

    They have nice big pictures there so you can actually tell what those dial looking things are.

  118. Nice Knobs by Sherloch+Hemloch · · Score: 1

    Granted, I didn't read the article, just looked at the pictures (hey, I have an art degree). But the two circular 'knobs' on the monitor remind me of the TV I used to plug my Timex Sinclar 1000 into -back when 1K was this boundless void of ram.

    --
    Never trust a bald barber; he has no respect for your hair
  119. From Carly Fiorina's bio at hp.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " Fiorina holds a bachelor's degree in medieval history and philosophy from Stanford University "

    *Insert jibe about her medieval treatment of HP here*

    Alex 4.0

  120. wow by jglow · · Score: 1

    a new way for my employer to cram me into an even _smaller_ space than I'm already in now.

    --


    There's no "I" in Linux.. err..
  121. Stupid looking monitor by __4096 · · Score: 0

    That monitor looks like one of those old (pre-remote) tv's complete with separate dial for UHF and VHF stations

  122. how fucking lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what a piece of shit. the monitor looks very stupid the way they have it. if you must have a cd drive on the monitor, at least they could have mounted it on the back so that you don't have this wasted blue hunking real-estate on the side. where do they find their industrial design guys? toys"r"us? gm? zenith? i'm sure they were tops in their class. what a joke. hawaii five-0 anyone?

    small box is nice. but come on, it's still a box. ooooh, how original.

    keyboard and mice are old news. nothing special.

    you can say what you like about apple, but at least they know how to make shit look good. the rest of the industry in that regard just plain sucks.

    -running with scissors

  123. KVM Problem... by eander315 · · Score: 1
    OK, who's going to develop the first Bluetooth/wireless KVM to use with these new-fangled machines?

    By the way, aren't there security concerns with running every interface on the PC as wireless? Brings a whole new definition to sniffing/hacking someone's box if you can hijack the video, input devices, and network connectivity.

  124. PC Jr. had wireless keyboard by suitti · · Score: 1
    The PC Jr.'s keyboard was IR. It suffered from IR things - like not always working when the curtains were open. Still, the PC Jr. didn't die because of the keyboard. It died because it wasn't quite compatible.

    With RF, I might be concerned that I'd have yet another plain text connection that could be snooped.

    Does anyone remember when keyboards were attached to the terminal? It was such a nice thing when, finally, you could put the thing in your lap. Now we have the Enterprise class keyboard (named after the aircraft carrier, which it resembles. There are all these extra keys on one side. So in the lap, the keyboard is an out of balance accident waiting to happen.

    Laptops have nice compact keyboards that you can put in your lap, but the monitor goes into your lap too.

    --
    -- Stephen.
  125. Cube by Refrag · · Score: 2

    This seems to me that HP was inspired by Apple's Cube. The color scheme looks the same (from the tiny pictures), they tried to minimize cables (Cube had ADC & AirPort), a slot load optical drive, and they are using airflow to control the temperature just like the Cube.

    --
    I have a website. It's about Macs.