Slashdot Mirror


Windows XP Embedded

Embedded Geek writes: "Embedded Systems Programming has a piece about Microsoft organizing its employees to advocate their embedded products in online newsgroups (part of "a new culture at Microsoft" making "an effort to shed the company's reputation as an incommunicative giant.") This is coordinated with Microsoft's launch of Windows XP Embedded at their Embedded Developers' Conference (the countdown clock on their homepage says Wednesday but the launch party is Thursday)." News.com notes that this will be used in slot machines and ATMs. Insert obligatory free-money joke.

382 comments

  1. Embedded in what? by ralmeida · · Score: 5, Funny

    In a S/390?

    --
    This space left intentionally blank.
    1. Re:Embedded in what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Isn't the point of modding stuff up to give points to posts that are worthwhile. A post that gets a "heh" out of me, doesn't deserve a +5.

      The problem is that at the beginning of a story a post can receive serveral moderations at once. Like one person mods it up, while 3 other people are still glancing over the front page deciding what they want to mod, so those 3 mod it up, all thinking they'll just bump it up to a +2, but instead gets a +5 because lots of people do the same thing.

      In short, moderators should not be able to mod a post up that has changed karma points since the viewing of the post.

      Thank you.

    2. Re:Embedded in what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh great. Do I need to get new activation code when I change my tires and oil or seats in my car ?

    3. Re:Embedded in what? by Chundra · · Score: 2

      moderators should not be able to mod a post up that has changed karma points since the viewing of the post.

      I have a solution. Put slashdot in a critical section. Yes, you heard me correctly and I mean all of it. One user at a time. No pushing. Please take a number and queue up, we'll notify you when it is your turn.

    4. Re:Embedded in what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds good to me.
      your turn is over now,
      Come back in a year.

    5. Re:Embedded in what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aww, so close. How about: Yes, sounds good to me. Sorry, your turn is over, Come back in a year.

    6. Re:Embedded in what? by MrBoring · · Score: 1

      Are you sure the mainframe has the capacity to run XP? :)

    7. Re:Embedded in what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Or they could just work it so that if a user hits "moderate", and some of the posts being moderated have changed scores since the last page view, the moderator in question is redirected to a special page saying
      hi, this was the score of this post when you loaded the last page, but now it's this. Do you still want your score 1, insightful to happen? Uncheck the checkboxes by any posts you want to cancel your moderation on, then click "confirm" and all your other moderations will be put into effect.
      Silly-head!
    8. Re:Embedded in what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a screenshot

  2. Win CE by dda · · Score: 1

    I though that Windows CE was an experience bad enough to avoid them to restart that kind of experience .. but you how they are , everywhere :)

  3. This is not the traditional embedded market by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Where smallness, understandability, low power consumption, and bullet-proof reliability are the key factors. I don't know who would put XP in a critical device. I don't know who would put Linux in one either, for that sake. "Embedded" in the Microsoft sense must mean "PDAs and museum kiosks" and such, and not the traditional embedded market.

    1. Re:This is not the traditional embedded market by pi+radians · · Score: 1

      "Slot machines and ATMs".... geez, you guys don't even read the quick description anymore let alone the actual article, do ya?

      --

      sin(6cos(r)+5A)
    2. Re:This is not the traditional embedded market by silicon_synapse · · Score: 1

      Well....modern slot machines and ATMs are sorta kiosks. He's not completely over the top. I think he made his point.

    3. Re:This is not the traditional embedded market by KevinGale · · Score: 0

      > Where smallness ...

      Small is a relative term as is embedded. Memory is cheap who cares if you need a bunch. I mean what are we saving it for?

      I don't think XP Embedded is going to show up in home thermostats soon but there are lots of markets where adding a hard disk and a bunch of memory is not a problem.

      Also off the shelf PCs actually do quite well in industrial monitoring and control applications. We have many PC's running NT in printing plants that just run and run without any problems.

      So a company can leverage it's experience with PC's and Windows. Customers also are comfortable since it's just another Windows PC.

    4. Re:This is not the traditional embedded market by Paul+Johnson · · Score: 3, Funny
      Here in the UK they have been putting plasma screens in motorway service stations to show adverts and bits of news and travel info.


      I was there when the server rebooted. It showed a Windows 2000 desktop with an error message in a dialog box.


      Hmmm. Microsoft Windows: Suddenly everything sticks.


      Paul.

      --
      You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
    5. Re:This is not the traditional embedded market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A real "Embedded" system has a tiny processor like a 80186, maybe 4-16K of RAM and could be powered from a 9 Volt battery.

      I know for a fact you can't run WinXP on this. But neither can you run Linux.

      Neither a PDA or Museum kiosk is an embedded system as they both have user interfaces.

    6. Re:This is not the traditional embedded market by snatchitup · · Score: 1

      A real "Embedded" system has a tiny processor like a 80186, maybe 4-16K of RAM and could be powered from a 9 Volt battery.

      Nah. A real embedded system has an ARM chip, and much more memory, not a power hog x86 chip.. (9-volt is true, or really just a couple of 1.5v's.

      They run on RTOS's. Or, something like OS/9. They are compiled with THUMB compilers that allow multiple instructions within one 32bit address space.

    7. Re:This is not the traditional embedded market by Lozzer · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've seen the Windows 2000 login screen at an ATM in the UK (with an error box behind it), which I have to say scared the willies out of me. I almost wish I'd had a camera with me at the time.

      Hmm this appears to be my (2^8)th post, glad I'm not a Pacman machine.

      --
      Special Relativity: The person in the other queue thinks yours is moving faster.
    8. Re:This is not the traditional embedded market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The embedded systems I've developed involved 4-bit NEC processors that provided the entire system on a single chip. The LCD controller, A/D converter (for measurement and for power management), the matrix-based control panel array, all on a single chip. And programmed in assembly language, of course.

    9. Re:This is not the traditional embedded market by Bongo · · Score: 1

      Here in the UK they have been putting plasma screens in motorway service stations to show adverts and bits of news and travel info.

      Yep. The other day my dash through the crowded train station foyer, while quickly glancing at the screens to see which platform the very next train would be leaving from... I was stopped in my tracks staring at the BSODs.

    10. Re:This is not the traditional embedded market by snatchitup · · Score: 1

      The ones I've had brief contact with were video display controllers that take rides on fly by sight missiles. The display cards, had ARMS, needed lots of memory, had no time for delay, and no time for a blue screen of death. Imagine a PC with basically no Pentium chip, all the applications running off the display card. It's possible.

    11. Re:This is not the traditional embedded market by Coyote67 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The Metrocard despencers in NYC use nt4. I had the privlage of watching one that was totally fubar. It kept rebooting, got everything from the bios to the boot screen info written down in my visor :). To show how great they are, I once kept pushing the coin return on a metrocard dispenser and it kicked out $20 in dollar coins. Can't wait for XP to get into ATMS :P

    12. Re:This is not the traditional embedded market by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      The newer models of Tektronix oscilloscopes have Win2k UIs.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    13. Re:This is not the traditional embedded market by cactopus · · Score: 1

      Hey Windows 2000 at an ATM isn't bad... you haven't had an ATM crash on you and reboot showing Windows 95...

      That was sick... it was at Bank of New York.

      -- My brother also had this happen but the Win95 ATM took his card.

    14. Re:This is not the traditional embedded market by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      Ah, smartcard enabled a coke vending machine using the good 'ol 68HC11... all asm of course... circuit board and all designed by my fellow co-worker, oh those were the days.... *hazy eyes towards the horizon*

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
    15. Re:This is not the traditional embedded market by Gonarat · · Score: 1

      The Jigsaw and 680 terminals (small terminals that read Mag stripe and smart cards) that we use where I work do use a 80186 along with a dos-like os. We program our apps in C, then upload the compiled version to the terminal either during a settlement or from a PC depending on the retailer setup.


      However, larger terminals such as ATMs, customer information systems (Highway and Weather conditions at a truck stop or rest area as an example) do use Windows (I have seen enough BSOD's and other window error messages stuck on the screen of these systems to know for sure). I would be real leary of using Windows as the OS for a slot machine -- state regulatory commissions (especially NJ) are real touchy about the operation and payouts of slot machines and such. As a manufacturer or customer, I would rather KNOW what all is going on in my device and since Windows is closed source, that leaves Linux as a good alternative. You also don't need the processor power that XP requires for a Linux based system.



      As a side note, it was interesting to find out that Kroger's (a supermarket chain in our neck of the woods) self checkout system is Windows based. I was in our local store the other day, and the self checkout terminals were closed due to being moved because of the store's remodelling. The terminals were hooked up and powered up, and one of the screens sported a start button et al. I was unable to get close enough to see if it was Win95, 98, or 2K.

      --
      Beware of Sleestak
    16. Re:This is not the traditional embedded market by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      I don't think there was ever such thing as an 80186. It went from 8086 to 80268.

    17. Re:This is not the traditional embedded market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Neither a PDA or Museum kiosk is an embedded system as they both have user interfaces.

      Anything that has users has a user interface. There can't be many systems that you do count as embedded.

    18. Re:This is not the traditional embedded market by MrBoring · · Score: 1

      I admit to saying positive things about MS products and ideas in the past. However, after using W2000 last night, suffering the slowness that it brought on, I wonder who would use XP in even a PDA or museum kiosk. Browsing, and searching activities have slowed to the point that it's now faster to use paper and pencil. Let's hope Linux doesn't learn from that aspect of software misengineering.

    19. Re:This is not the traditional embedded market by Cadderly · · Score: 1

      Yup there IS a 80186 CPU....

    20. Re:This is not the traditional embedded market by MrBoring · · Score: 1

      I agree. I joke about this, but maybe it'd be more reliable, and cheaper to build a kiosk or a desk, staff it 24x7 with cheap labor and paper, and have human beings than to pay support costs for MS products. Is quality going down?

    21. Re:This is not the traditional embedded market by Cadderly · · Score: 1

      Did anyone checked out the Xp embedded site? There is a movie on it of how you can configure your OS for your embedded app... and that is rather impressive... It is all drag and drop and works really fast... I have ordered the test cd , I am curious of how small I will be able to make the dist. It should run on a ZFx86 100 Mhz with 16 Meg ram, No video and 32 Meg Flashcard... If it does that and runs stable I might think of using it... bye bye Dos :)

    22. Re:This is not the traditional embedded market by jmauro · · Score: 1

      80186 was skipped over by general computer manufactures, but is very common on hard drive. For a while most hd microcontrollers were 80186s. They stayed in production longer than the 80286s in the end.

    23. Re:This is not the traditional embedded market by MrBoring · · Score: 2, Informative
      The self checkout market has many vendors. Having worked with one for Kroger, I can assure you that the back end at least, won't be Windows based. I'm reasonably certain the user GUI won't be either. The Kroger supermarket application runs on IBM's 4690 POS OS, which is based on a DOS derivative.

      The 4690 OS much more light weight, designed for reliability and quality, and to a greater extent, upgradability. It's also been around for over 10 years. Stores have been known to run for two weeks on backup servers without even knowing it was switched over.

      Also, different than Fat MS, I've been told to keep my code small so that the base Kroger supermarket app can fit within 1mb of ram. I'm not saying everything should be programmed this way, but the constraints put upon by *good* kiosks, cash registers, ATM's, and especially embedded devices are too heavy for something like XP.

    24. Re:This is not the traditional embedded market by redwraith · · Score: 1

      Hey, felt somebody oughta reply to this :).

      At work a few years ago we tested out HP and Tek logic analyzers, and the Tek ones were running Win95 if I remember correctly, and the HP ones ran (as far as I could tell) some goofy fvwm in windows look alike mode.

      We ended up going with HP. My favorite thing about the HPs is that I can xhost the LA at my desk and wait for it to trigger in the comfort of my own cube. I wonder if you can do the same with a Win95 box? Doubt it.

      Sure hope not actually, as pricey as those damn HP (oh I'm sorry, Agilent) machines are.

    25. Re:This is not the traditional embedded market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are currently experimenting with an ARCOM Target SBC it has one 80186cpu, 256kbyte of memor and some I/O(serial and parallel). Really neat stuff. We also have 2 LED's, green and red!

    26. Re:This is not the traditional embedded market by prufrax · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of customers out there who want a Windows front end on their embedded device no matter how inappropriate. Which is why things like Intime exist - an RTOS kernel with Windows running as the lowest priority process.

      The real-time bit does the real work, and occasionally hands a few spare CPU cycles to windows so it can update the screen. Even if the pretty front-end BSODs, the real-time part is still running in the background.

      WinCE and Embedded XP on the other hand are useless for anything with even vaguely hard real-time requirements. PDAs and information kiosks are what they are aimed at.

      (declaration of interest: I work for Locsoft Ltd, who distribute Intime in the UK.)

    27. Re:This is not the traditional embedded market by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

      Here in the UK they have been putting plasma screens in motorway service stations to show adverts and bits of news and travel info.

      I was there when the server rebooted. It showed a Windows 2000 desktop with an error message in a dialog box.

      Well, a small town I used to live in had a cable channel. They used to run ads for the more expensive channel packages there.

      Year later, they just started running a small, 10-second black-and-white animation that - well - made no sense in any context. (I don't remember what it said, but I tell you, the message didn't really make much sense. Next time I go visiting, I'll start an intellectual discussion on should that be called Dada or Surrealism... it was bit of a both, I guess.)

      I doubt anyone watched the channel for ads. I doubt anyone watched the channel for that animation either.

      Well, last time I looked, it had a Windows NT desktop, with the "multimedia show" folder open. (Can't remember which type of file it was...)

      You can't even rely on it to run a short, black and white animation reliably... =)

    28. Re:This is not the traditional embedded market by naskovz · · Score: 1

      At a bank in FL I drove up to an ATM
      and I could see an OS/2 Warp desktop on
      the screen. It was not a touchscreen ATM so
      nothing to do with it... So get ready to
      see more of those...

      "Please enter your PIN:"
      beep...buop...beap...biip
      "CONGRATULATIONS THE FBI MAGIC LANTERN HAS IDENTIFIED
      YOU AS A POTENTIAL WINNER!!! PLEASE WAIT
      FOR ONE OF OUR FRIENDLY PERSONEL REPRESENTATIVES
      TO GET IN CONTACT WITH YOU AT THE
      CONVINIENCE OF YOUR CURRENT LOCATION..


      GG8%HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH <- progress bar?

      Estimated time to your arrest: 4h 32m 42s

      Did you know that with Mcrsft Atmdows you
      can say goodbye to the safety of both your
      personal and business information?
      Ask the person(s) en route to your location
      for more details...

  4. How fun by rnb · · Score: 1, Troll

    To ensure that the developers truly address the users' issues, Microsoft has even assigned its own people to watch the news groups as spectators and look for any questions that go unanswered. If issues are left unresolved, the "spectators" prod the developers to respond.

    Wow, working for them must be just like a non-stop party. "You vill reply to ziss NOW!"

    1. Re:How fun by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 3, Flamebait
      I can just see the job description now:

      Wanted: Internet browser. Microsoft is seeking qualified and motivated individuals to browse the net and read Usenet news. Must possess abilities with WWW and NNTP technologies as well as verbal and written communication skills.

      Hell, I know some people who would probably jump at the opportunity to browse the net and get paid for it. (Well, at least have it as part of their job description. :) )

    2. Re:How fun by ethereal · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Wait a minute - NNTP isn't a Microsoft protocol. Surely there must be some mistake here?

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

    3. Re:How fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Warning, this is -1 flamebait, but here goes anyway.

      Does the also mean that MSFT goons will soon officially hang around slashdot and post their pro-windows pro-xbox pro-msn pro-hotmail pro-MSbob messages praising MSFT using pseudo-technical terms such that they get modded up to +5 informative?

      Pretty soon any anti-MS post, no matter how justified, will be responded to by a flood of pro-MS posts

      Most of us assumed there were MS drones here on /. before, but MSFT is admitting to it. Paid MSFT employees will hang around /., linuxtoday, and probably many other sites and spout their bullshit.

      To paraphrase the planet-of-the-apes ending of Spaceballs : MSFT, oh shit. There goes the planet.

    4. Re:How fun by nanojath · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, man, working for Microsoft ROCKS! I LOVE this company! I LOVE THIS COMPANY! Who told you to sit down?! Did I mention how awesome Microsoft embedded systems are? They ROCK!

      --

      It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries

    5. Re:How fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my friend, we are already here. under the rock of every AC, around the corner of every Troll, we have been here.. watching.. you... studying... you...

      Resistence is futile.

    6. Re:How fun by liquidsin · · Score: 1

      if my Microsoft-owned slashdot account had any mod points left, I mod you up. but it doesn't. oh well.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    7. Re:How fun by Stackis · · Score: 1

      Then show your face...or are you afraid?

      --

      "Look where we worship" -- Jim Morrison
    8. Re:How fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never been very good at appreciating sarcasm, have you?

    9. Re:How fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. I'm a sysadmin at a university and I get paid (not a bad salary either) to sit around and basically do just that. Maybe I get 5-15 minutes of actual work related stuff done each day. It's pretty damn boring. Tell these people you know it's not as great as it sounds.

    10. Re:How fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must possess abilities with WWW and NNTP technologies as well as verbal and written communication skills.

      Hell, I know some people who would probably jump at the opportunity to browse the net and get paid for it

      Yes, but "j00 sux0rs, llama" doesn't qualify as "verbal and written communication skills" (5k1llz?)
    11. Re:How fun by Computer+suck! · · Score: 0

      that sounds like my job...

      CS, Systems Support Officer (AKA pro-web browser...)

  5. replaces embedded NT by martin · · Score: 5, Informative

    that already is running lots of ATM's out there. Do you ever see a BSOD on a cashpoint - I haven't?

    Given the increase in complexity and code size its going to be interesting to see how it goes into devices.

    1. Re:replaces embedded NT by betel · · Score: 3, Informative

      The classic one used to be on the Natwest cash machine at Charing Cross station (London, UK) - for weeks it displayed "a device driver cannot be loaded", but it still gave out cash with no problems (I can't remember if it actually came out of my account though).

      Or the Natwest ones at Manchester Uni which were rebooted every Monday morning.

      Or the Nationwide one at my local tube station, its spent most of the last fortnight moaning about something not being loaded and just generally not working.

    2. Re:replaces embedded NT by tangent3 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I've seen plenty of BSoD'ed kiosks around here in Singapore. Not ATM machines, but farecard top-up kiosks and information kiosks.

    3. Re:replaces embedded NT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's because they run OS/2

      I have NEVER seen an ATM run anything but OS/2 or dos. the banking industry doesnt screw around with unstable software like windows.

    4. Re:replaces embedded NT by Arjen · · Score: 3, Informative

      Do you ever see a BSOD on a cashpoint - I haven't?

      I have

    5. Re:replaces embedded NT by platypus · · Score: 2

      lately I saw an BSOD'ed ATM.

      Well, it was the OS/2 Warp equivalent of a bsod. The machine rebooted, I saw BIOS messages.

      Then I went to another ATM, got my money, and out of curiosity, went again to the broken ATM.

      OS/2 was still booting, it looked very ugly and hacky (some errors in autoexec.bat or whatever it's called in OS/2) - it also told me several times to hit enter or something.
      Then something funny happened, it told me (as I was looking at the screen) to insert a disk. It beeped and *lighted the slot where you insert the card*!

    6. Re:replaces embedded NT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That isn't a BSOD. It looks like a out of disk space error.

    7. Re:replaces embedded NT by ethereal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes. Just because you've never seen it doesn't mean it doesn't occur. Maybe that's why that ATM seems to be running embedded DOS now...

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

    8. Re:replaces embedded NT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The Natwest one in Leeds station blue-screened on me as well. I was standing in line, waiting to use it when the woman in front of me complained that the machine was out of order. When I looked at it, there was the familiar BSOD, it counted down and rebooted. I didn't catch the SP level or other details, other than when it reached the login screen, it appeared to login automatically. Brief pause, and then the main screen came back.

      Diverting as it was though, I decided I probably didn't want to trust it with my card, so I just went elsewhere. The thing that gets me though, is how much overkill it probably is using NT for something like a cash-point, especially when you can't really strip the crap out you don't want.

    9. Re:replaces embedded NT by koekepeer · · Score: 1

      I have, unfortunately I don't have the picture to prove it. It was at an ABN-AMRO ATM near the Waterloo square in Amsterdam. It ran Windows NT4. And it was a true BSOD, after pressing some buttons it even tried to restart, immediately crashing again after loading.

      Meneer de Koekepeer

    10. Re:replaces embedded NT by morbid · · Score: 0

      I saw a BSOD on an NT4 cashpoint, and I took a photo to prove it (never scanned it in though).
      It was an error in C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\KRNL32.DLL or something. Nat West, Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex, UK c.1997/1998?

      --
      I'm out of my tree just now but please feel free to leave a banana.
    11. Re:replaces embedded NT by cmclean · · Score: 2, Funny
      Charing Cross station (London, UK) - for weeks it displayed "a device driver cannot be loaded"

      And the Natwest ATM at Waterloo Station (again London, UK) which BSOD'd on the lady before me in the queue, taking her card with it.

      She's probably the only person I know with a personal reason to hate Microsoft. Hehe.

      cmclean

      P.S. Did you know the term "Cashpoint" is copyright in the UK by LloydsTSB? wtf?

      --
      "Any similarity between the hooting of a million eager monkeys and Slashdot is purely coincidental." -THEFLASHMAN
    12. Re:replaces embedded NT by Bert64 · · Score: 0

      Yes, i saw ABN-AMRO ATM`s in Rotterdam crash, freeze up, reboot and bluescreen on many occasions. One was actually locked up solid for 3 days before they sent someone to reboot it. Another slowed to a crawl, than randomly rebooted while being used..

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    13. Re:replaces embedded NT by labratuk · · Score: 1
      Do you ever see a BSOD on a cashpoint - I haven't?


      Not quite, but I have seen one on a train ticket machine. For the rest of you in the UK, it was one of those computerised ones they have on the Thameslink lines. I was so upset because I didnt have a camera with me.

      In fact come to think of it, it wansn't quite a BSOD, but an 'Error in kernel32.dll'.

      --
      Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
    14. Re:replaces embedded NT by King+Of+Chat · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you're talking about the message "At least one service or device driver failed during startup. Check event log for details." then that's OK. All the NT systems I've ever seen (OK, the ones I've set up) do this - that's how you know it's working properly.

      --
      This sig made only from recycled ASCII
    15. Re:replaces embedded NT by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      More like that with the time-delays involved in RFPing the hardware and software, selecting from the submissions, getting it up and running, testing, meetings, meetings, meetings, OS/2 was the only stable candidate in the early/mid '90's.

      The banking industry has a mightly long development pipeline. Now if they'd only switch to Open Source ATMs... :^) (Right about the time porcine aviation happens.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    16. Re:replaces embedded NT by biobogonics · · Score: 1

      I've also seen NT running Coinstar machines. [These count a pile of coins and issue a receipt similar to that used for bottle deposits, but they take 8.5% as a processing fee.] Obviously I know that they run NT because I have seen several booting and re-booting.

    17. Re:replaces embedded NT by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 0
      OS/2 only has a config.sys. Actually it was a great concept.

      I think that in my country all ATM's are Unix based. Most of them are Bull machines, I don't think they do NT.

    18. Re:replaces embedded NT by MarkLR · · Score: 1

      I've had an ATM running OS/2 freeze on me while my bank card was in it and that was in the mid 90's. I guess even OS/2 was not that stable.

    19. Re:replaces embedded NT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I question your veracity. The OS/2 version of a BSOD is a black screen that says something along the lines of "System halted...contact IBM support" with lots of diagnostic info.
      No soft reset can reboot the machine, it must be physically powered off.

    20. Re:replaces embedded NT by rnturn · · Score: 2, Flamebait
      ``Do you ever see a BSOD on a cashpoint - I haven't?''

      Heck neither have I (We usually call 'em ATMs on the Western side of the Big Swamp). But I have seen plenty of BSODed flight info displays at airports and other places.

      Hmm... I wonder. I've seen a few photos of prominent BSOD displays pop up from time to time (here and on other web sites). Anyone know of a web site that specializes in those? Could be good for a laugh.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    21. Re:replaces embedded NT by Ami+Ganguli · · Score: 2

      Something similar happened to me a few years ago. An OS/2 based ATM crashed while I was making a withdrawal. The cash dispensor made funny noises for a little while and, just before it should have given me my money, it died.

      I was worried about my transaction and went to the next machine to see if the money was gone from my account. Sure enough, the withdrawal had been recorded but I had no money. Worried, I called my bank immediately.

      Then something neat happened. While I was on hold the crashed ATM went through it's startup sequence and apparently counted it's till! By the time I actually got through to a bank CSR, the machine had noticed that it had more money than it should and reversed my failed transaction, all without human intervention.

      That's some seriously cool programming.

      --
      It is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail. - Abraham Maslow
    22. Re:replaces embedded NT by cHALiTO · · Score: 1

      well no, but i was one zapping on tv and there was nothing worth seeing... except for that channel with the channel and show list. it clearly displayed a typical windows "*insert_program_name_here* has made an illegal operation and will shut down" or something like that, all with it's "stop" sign and close and details buttons. right between the 3:00AM and 4:00AM shows.

      so now they get free advertising too.

      --
      "Luck is my middle name," said Rincewind, indistinctly. "Mind you, my first name is Bad." -- Terry Pratchett
    23. Re:replaces embedded NT by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 0

      A quick google gave me this . Surely there must be more....

    24. Re:replaces embedded NT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have crash an ATM and see it going to cold start
      and power up selft test etc.

    25. Re:replaces embedded NT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have, at a Wells Fargo ATM in California.
      Put my card in and it crashed then rebooted.
      During the reboot there was the familiar
      Windows NT 4 boot sequence. Ate my card too,
      never gave it back.

    26. Re:replaces embedded NT by Computer! · · Score: 2

      I saw an arcade machine BSOD one time. Can't remember which one, but it was a sit-down multiplayer jetski racing game.

      Seriously, though, Windows works a lot better for embedded than people think. Remember Dreamcast? It's up to the embedded programmers to do a good job of customizing Windows for their chosen platform, and that's where problems usually happen. Most times, PHBs choose Windows for a project because of the shorter dev cycle. That right there indicates that there's a deadline crunch, which should explain the sloppy code.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    27. Re:replaces embedded NT by meffie · · Score: 1

      This is why more than 99% of the ATMs on the planet still run OS/2.

    28. Re:replaces embedded NT by perky · · Score: 1
      Do you ever see a BSOD on a cashpoint - I haven't

      actually yes. quite frequently. It also explains why the last cashpoint I saw rebooting itself had 64Mb of RAM on board according to the startup stats. 64Mb!!! to run a bloody cashpoint.

      By the way, this is not to diminish the quality of MS embedded solutions. I have no idea how solid they are, and I guess that most of the people here don't know either. That won't stop them having a rant and making some funny funny ha ha jokes about crashing jukeboxes/ATM/whatever.

      --
      "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
    29. Re:replaces embedded NT by perky · · Score: 1

      actually that has more to do with the maturity of the CICS client for OS/2 than anything else.

      --
      "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
    30. Re:replaces embedded NT by perky · · Score: 1

      That's CICS.

      --
      "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
    31. Re:replaces embedded NT by Jupiter9 · · Score: 1

      That's pretty funny, but that's not a BSOD, it's just an error popup window. BSOD would be a completely blue screen giving you some archaic error message in which the only recovery is a re-boot.

      --

      --
      Does anyone remember /\/\/\?
    32. Re:replaces embedded NT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a decent concept with extremely poor execution. Ever had 2 OS/2 drivers that both demanded to be the last entry in the config.sys?

      I'm fucking glad to have a registry after spending a year of my life fighting with OS/2 machines (servers).

    33. Re:replaces embedded NT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contrary to popular anti-Microsoft opinion, OS/2 wasn't really any more stable than WinNT, probably slightly less so because of the relative poor maturity of the drivers.

      It was a decent desktop platform (what it was designed for), but tended to shit itself under any serious load.

      But, as mentioned, it was probably the best bet for a CISC client in the mid-90s.

    34. Re:replaces embedded NT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I've seen pictures of a crashed ATM that was running some form of Windows.

      Check out the following links:

      http://zem.squidly.org/bsod/
      http://digitallaughter.com/pix/sparbank.jpg

    35. Re:replaces embedded NT by platypus · · Score: 1

      you're right, it might not exactly have been the "OS/2" bluescreen, but fact is the machine was rebooting and didn't come up - at least not up to it's normal functionality. I suspected a reboot because of a driver. Spontanous reboots when something in kernelspace goes wrong happen under win* and linux, why not with OS/2?

      So, the difference to a BSOD is not too big, that was what I meant(sp?)

    36. Re:replaces embedded NT by Computer+suck! · · Score: 0

      Do you ever see a BSOD on a cashpoint - I haven't?
      Head on over to the Universty Of Bradford, and watch Natwest Hole-In-The-Wall on campus. It had an uptime of less than a week.

      It throws new errors each week from BSOD's to kernal32.dll...

      A fun game for all the family.

    37. Re:replaces embedded NT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ran OS/2 servers and workstations from '93-'98 and never had a spontaneous reboot. But, you're right...it could happen. More likely it was a power failure (which shouldn't have happened either since ATMs should have a robust UPS).

    38. Re:replaces embedded NT by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 0
      Well, no.....but I had some exotic hardware running on OS/2. Never had too much problems.

      Actually, I like having my /etc What is a registry? ;-)

    39. Re:replaces embedded NT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree - I've run a lot of OS/2 and NT machines over the years and I've never seen one spontanously reboot (except 2K machines where that's the default setting that someone forgot to turn off, or if you are running Compaq firmware that saves off the dump and reboots.)

      Maybe if there's a powersuppy problem, but otherwise that wouldn't be the correct operaton.

    40. Re:replaces embedded NT by cygnusx · · Score: 2

      Never seen a BSOD on my ATMs... but one time it went into a "load-money" operation or something like that in front of me... and what I saw was, quite amazingly, Microsoft OS/2 1.3!

      There is a lot of inertia among banks against replacing systems that work. XP will have to prove itself many *years* before a hardnosed banker will reconsider.

      --PD

    41. Re:replaces embedded NT by DaAdder · · Score: 1

      Actually, I HAVE seen NT-based ATM's do bad things.

      A terminal belonging to one of the bigger domestic banks in sweden, Föreningssparbanken, did very bad things:
      It crashed, it rebooted, you could follow everything that happened on the cute little colorized display. Going through hardware, detecting cd players and whatnot. Finally entering WinNT where it spent an awfully long time starting up this and that application.

      I *always* wondered why those spiffy looking ATM's always were sluggish, always out of order and generally a drag to deal with.
      Guess that explained it :)

    42. Re:replaces embedded NT by OmegaDan · · Score: 2

      Seriously cool? its *responsible* programming :)

    43. Re:replaces embedded NT by zonker · · Score: 0

      yeah, version 1.3 at that!!

    44. Re:replaces embedded NT by ayjay29 · · Score: 1

      Do you ever see a BSOD on a cashpoint - I haven't?

      It happens sometimes in Sweden check this out.

      --
      Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
  6. Impressive by Knunov · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow. It turns out you only need 512 MB RAM, 1 gig of storage and a 900MHz CPU on your embedded device to run this.

    Wait a minute...

    Knunov

    --
    Why do users with IDs under 100,000 or over 700,000 usually have the most worthwhile comments?
    1. Re:Impressive by selectspec · · Score: 2

      The 1GB hard drive is the best. Hmm, we'll just put a hard drive in our embedded system slashing its MTBF by about 99%!!!

      --

      Someone you trust is one of us.

    2. Re:Impressive by SloppyElvis · · Score: 1

      That's funny. I looked briefly, but I couldn't find any technical info, only drum-beating. That's a good joke, but I was really wondering about the requirements of EmbXP like memory, etc. Does anybody out there have some technical info to share (links?), or is this news just for yucks?

    3. Re:Impressive by Enkur · · Score: 0

      Well of course you need to have quality hardware to run those 10 extra services (with probably another 5 for embedded) MS throws in XP with meaningless names and functions known only to those who created the Nintendo-looking icons (half of them probably manage the display of the garish UI...and of course a couple for solitaire).

    4. Re:Impressive by TheCrunch · · Score: 1

      Heh.. now each time I try to withdraw cash it'll say "Insufficient memory" instead of "Insufficient funds".

      Quack.

      --
      My life is one big siesta in which I'm dreaming I wished my life was one big siesta.
    5. Re:Impressive by bug1 · · Score: 1

      It took me 10 mintues or so of searching to find this page... im not sure wether these system requirements are actually for XP emebeded or simulating it under a normal XP (like a virtual machine)

      If these system requirements are true then i think it just demonstrates there cluelessness.. they are considering a PC that was top of the line a few years ago to be an embedded system.

      In my mind embeded systems are cut down computers like PDA's, 16MB ram, flash, no hdd etc, not desktop class machines.

      I mean if microsoft sold mainframes they would probably have an embedded version of that

      http://www.microsoft.com/windows/embedded/xp/eva lu ation/sysreqs/default.asp

      System requirements

      500MHz Processor

      Minimum of 128 MB ram if using tools OR database, minimum 256MB ram if using both.

      200MB disk space for tools, 2.5 GB disk space for database.

    6. Re:Impressive by SPiKe · · Score: 1

      Totally reminds me of Microsoft Money.

    7. Re:Impressive by Ivan+Raikov · · Score: 1

      System requirements
      500MHz Processor
      Minimum of 128 MB ram if using tools OR database, minimum 256MB ram if using both.
      200MB disk space for tools, 2.5 GB disk space for database.

      Sigh... And to think that I'm currently designing an embedded device with 2MB of Flash, 512KB SRAM and a 20MHz Dragonball. I should've asked the Great Wise Microsoft how to do it right.

    8. Re:Impressive by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      Microsoft...Microsoft...In case you haven't noticed...4 gig drives don't grow on trees...

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    9. Re:Impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It says it right in the URL you provided.

      evaluation

      But have your fun. Sit there in your ghetto and laugh, boy, laugh.

    10. Re:Impressive by RedGuard · · Score: 1

      That's the requirements for the system you are doing development on.

    11. Re:Impressive by AndroidCat · · Score: 2

      Yeah, check around -- It's hard to buy them that small these days! :^)

      Heh, I finally decided to clean up my "bone yard" of old computers, and pitch out anything left over when I ran out of hard drives. The last was a 486/66 with a 205M and 82M drive. That 82M drive was the big drive on my multi-user Coherent/Linux 386/25 8M ram BBS machine.

      There is something very fscked when a Xenu-damned appliance requires that much power and storage!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    12. Re:Impressive by SloppyElvis · · Score: 1

      Yeah, those are IDE requirements, as evidenced by the fact that you need Windows 2000 or better as an OS, which wouldn't really make sense any other way. Also, requiring a DVD drive on an embedded system... no I don't think so.

    13. Re:Impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I've pared it down to 64 megs for bare bones web browsing, and 110 Megs for Web, Music, etc.

    14. Re:Impressive by Computer+suck! · · Score: 0

      DVD are now a reqirement for ALL embedded systems,why I won't buy a washing machine unless it comes with a DVD drive and MS logos...

  7. Re:Screw XP by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 2

    The same reason that people use Windows CE: because it's Microsoft, it's supported (in theory), and someone in their organization told them to). And as freaky as it may seem, some people might actually ENJOY using Windows CE. (I know I'm not one of them, but I'm sure it happens. :) )

  8. Did you see the video? by s2r · · Score: 0

    Developers !!! Developers !!!
    Developers !!! Developers !!!

    ehehehehhh

  9. they have no chance by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Embedded means small and fast, both of which cannot be done with Windows CE,Embedded NT, Embedded XP.

    This is why 60% of all embedded systems are DOS and then Linux (The linux side is growing fast.... and I mean really fast) and then specalized.

    If Microsoft can demonstrate a single floppy version of XP that needs only 4 meg of ram or less to run and leave room for my app then I'll take them serious.

    Until then Microsoft products are not looked at as a serious alternative or solution, they are too expensive to impliment in the hardware requirements.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:they have no chance by iguana · · Score: 1

      I think 90% of embedded devices are 16-bit or lower; 90% of those are probably 8-bit. Devices that must run literally for years without human intervention. DOS isn't reliable and Linux is too big.

      My thought has always been that MS targets systems that must interact with a human. GUIs have always been their strength. But I think people are missing the point of this article. MS is evolving again, tapping into the greatest thing about Linux--the developer community. MS has always had the ability to take what is best from an existing technology and integrate it into themselves.

    2. Re:they have no chance by GeorgieBoy · · Score: 1

      But QNX has one HUGE advantage - their OS fits in on the much smaller devices. Even if used on larger devices, there's more room left over for apps - not to mention QNX's micro-kernel architecture.

      The Photon GUI is quite small and very pretty.

      You can even run a Java environment on QNX using less storage space than Embedded NT/XP/etc, using an embedded VM such as IBM's VisualAge MicroEdition with (the J9 VM)

    3. Re:they have no chance by ivan256 · · Score: 2

      Last I checked, QNX was tiny and fit on a single floppy with a GUI and a web browser.

    4. Re:they have no chance by Watts+Martin · · Score: 2

      Actually, there are devices which have embedded operating systems but aren't necessarily "rich" in the Internet Appliance sense. High speed data and phone switches are a prime example--and yes, from what I understand (up until early this year I was at the engineering group of a fairly major CLEC), some of them really do run Embedded NT. And they're actually pretty stable. As one wag put it, "The 'NT' part isn't the problem, the 'Windows' part is."

      I'd really say that QNX's market is more along those lines, too. The QNX "Realtime Platform" has obviously been targeted for internet appliances, but its sibling, QNX RTOS 6, isn't.

    5. Re:they have no chance by umeshunni · · Score: 1

      WinXP Embedded memory footprints vary from 4 to 70 mb depending on what you need...kernel-mode only system or a full xp with IE, WMP etc..

    6. Re:they have no chance by umeshunni · · Score: 1

      Only something the like of DOS - with no or minimal layers of abstraction can fit within an MB - providing any kind of abstraction to I/O, networking or Display will cause the footprint to go thru the roof !

    7. Re:they have no chance by Ivan+Raikov · · Score: 1

      QNX and NT/CE embedded are competitive in size when a final build is ready.

      Huh? Embedded NT was 48 MB, as of January 1999. I don't see how you could possibly compare it a hard real-time, microkernel-based OS like QNX.

      The handy QNX demo-disk has a GUI, web server, web browser, dial-up connection program, text editor, and numerous device drivers -- that's already more than Microsoft can offer in of their "desktop" operating system products.

    8. Re:they have no chance by Cyberkidd · · Score: 1

      They're not doing quite the same thing, though. Granted, they are actually listening to input from their customers for a change. But they are not giving said customers access to the source code to allow them to fix the bugs themselves. So they are not using outside developers, as you suggest. Instead, they just are just trying to be more responsive to their customers now.

      --
      "I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."
    9. Re:they have no chance by Defector!!! · · Score: 1

      While their current products are abyssmal at best, the really important thing here is not the product. It's how they are developing this product. For once, Linux and the Free Software Community can truly claim a victory (even if it is only a moral one) because we have made Almighty M$ change the way they develop software.

      They had to listen to their customers, actively participate in discussion with them and (gasp!) even let them see the source code.

      M$ for once is trying to emulate US, not the other way around. We are definatly doing something right. Lets just hope that the management will try to kill this behavior, so that the embedded M$ community dies in it's infancy. Because, while Linux does have a head start in this respect, we lack the focus and direction to point at, say, just the emedded market and scream "Go for it!". Linux needs to win in key markets like these for it's eventual world domination to be assured ;-)

      Obviously notice has been served that, when it comes to mission critical applications, no more of this properity / closed shit will work. The markets that need dependability now know that they have to be able to independantly evaluate whatever it is that they are using.

      If this isn't a glaring reflection on how the Open Source movement is succeding, I don't know what is.

      --
      We are the all singing, all dancing crap of the world....
    10. Re:they have no chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      that is not embedded.

      That is small computing. Embedded is your car's OS, what runs your microwave, toaster oven, TV, aircraft.

      Microsoft is trying to re-define embedded to mean basically a P-II with 128Meg of storage.

      embedded is 386 with 2 meg ram and 2 meg flash.

      Please please do some research and see what embedded is instead of what is on the microsoft flyers, they are by no means industry experts and noone should ever take microsoft publications as anything but fiction.

    11. Re:they have no chance by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      First off anything with that much storage is not an embedded device. It doesn't even fit the term.
      and QNX is lumped into my linux comment as it is a Unix dirviative(sp?) also.

      QNX can do things that no embedded Microsoft product ever can. 1 floppy OS with GUI,TCP/IP stack and HTML browser. this put's QNX in a place that micrsoft cannot compete. The mebedded market is not Kiosks or palm or pocket devices. These are by no means embedded devices by any stretch of anyone's imagination, these are pocket computing platforms, which are nothing but toys or tools for the rich/geeks/salespeople/ceo's and are toys. Embedded systems control heavy equipment, run microsat's, perform datalogging and control the real world from your toaster-oven to your town's water filtration plant (both drinkable and sewage plants), Car stereo's, mp3 players, your digital cable box, routers, security systems.

      microsoft cannot compete in this realm, they cannot get their bloat down to the size needed to run our every-day devices and critical devices.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    12. Re:they have no chance by WasterDave · · Score: 2

      MS doesn't care about the market for headless, extremely small embedded OS's

      But that's the tragedy, actually they do. They're looking to leverage the foothold they have with SMB, borked Kerberos, ActiveDirectory etc. to make devices that appear on Microsoft networks nice and easily.

      They've been at this for ages, since the early days of NT4 believe it or not. Luckily the embedded arena generally regards Linux as being a bit lardy (but is coming around real fast) and hence has basically no interest in attempting to embed NT.

      Dave

      --
      I write a blog now, you should be afraid.
    13. Re:they have no chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually QNX6 and "Realtime Platform" are technicly the same thing :) The "Realtime Platform" is QNX6 with Photon2 MicroGUI as one package.

    14. Re:they have no chance by jsse · · Score: 2

      No way, CE on iPaq is pretty fast. We use it to show our trading demo to our investors.

      Their only question was that why did we need to reset the iPaq every time we run the demo.

      (Anyone would kindly advise how to prevent the iPaq from giving the loud *DING* sound while resetting would be greatly appreciated)

  10. This *is* news by bribecka · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    A company is getting their employees to promote their products? What is next? Renting out TV air time for, say, 30 seconds or so, to showcase that product...maybe with some background music? Perhaps Madonna will do?

    It's not just that this isn't "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"...it's not even NEWS!

    --

    Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket?

    1. Re:This *is* news by FortKnox · · Score: 1

      Dude, where have you been.

      If its a way to stuff it to MS, news or not, its on slashdot.

      Look at this:
      Insert obligatory free-money joke.

      Michael was even a greatly objective!

      I mean, a good journalist wouldn't pick a side and bash it, would he?

      It was good karma while it lasted, but saying anything against michael will get me -1 asap (remember, folks, he's the guy that brings you YRO, and owns censorware.org!).
      The irony is too much...

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    2. Re:This *is* news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It is news because it illustrates a problem that has been occurring on slashdot and other bulletin boards.

      Microsoft (among other groups/companies) runs "astroturf" campaigns where its marketeers post as ordinary readers to bullshit and browbeat the real readers into believing microsofts company line. Witness the recent bizarre pro-xbox and pro-winxp threads on this board.

      Microsoft has had the time and will to have its marketeers create what could amount to hundreds of slashdot accounts. These accounts can then be used to post very affective marketing messages disguised as "simple opinions from ordinary slashdotters."

      About a year ago, a scanned pamphlet was linked to from slashdot. The pamphlet was designed to recruit astroturfers to post to public forums and bulletin boards. The recruiter: Microsoft.

      This post does not necessarily deserve a rating higher than zero, but if it remains at zero, that could be an indication of just how many ms marketeering accounts actually exist here.

      Please also note the rating of the pro-microsoft parent.

    3. Re:This *is* news by bribecka · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      This post does not necessarily deserve a rating higher than zero, but if it remains at zero, that could be an indication of just how many ms marketeering accounts actually exist here.

      Please also note the rating of the pro-microsoft parent.


      First, your post may stay at zero because it is an AC post. Maybe it should be +1 insightful, maybe.

      Second, the rating on my original post is due to my karma, everything i post automatically gets a 2. If i post "can you imagine a beowulf cluster of these", that even gets a 2. Go figure.

      --

      Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket?

    4. Re:This *is* news by sam@caveman.org · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      yup, i'm sure michael personally looks at your post and thinks, 'oh gee this needs to be censored. the slashdot readership should not be allowed to view this opinion.'

      moderation is not censorship, it is moderating the crap (i.e., posts like yours which did not seem to say anything of importance) down so people can read the good stuff, like good old-fashioned 'hot grits' and flamebaits and trolls.

      and i have to add, nowhere will you find on slashdot any mention that many of the editors think they are either 'good journalists' or 'objective'. if you want that try a different website, but be warned that the two are nearly mutually exclusive in 'the wild', because good journalists get noticed, and nearly everyone has a price.

      i'll agree that it's too bad we can't have at least ONE of those traits here :) but hey, this is free, at least.

      so welcome to the real world, where yes, your opinion may be unpopular. but i seriously doubt many moderation points are wasted because 'oh! he doesn't like michael!' it is more like 'jeez, this post doesn't say a damn thing of interest. moving on...'

      -sam

      --
      burn the computers. go back to the abacus.
    5. Re:This *is* news by gazbo · · Score: 1
      The article is nothing about astroturfing. RTFA and you will see such specific things as teh fact that employees are told to use their real, internal email address. Also note that the forums (fora?) to which they post are password protected CE Beta forums. I don't know how to say this any clearer, this has nothing to do with astroturfing

      Microsoft (among other groups/companies) runs "astroturf" campaigns where its marketeers post as ordinary readers to bullshit and browbeat the real readers into believing microsofts company line. Witness the recent bizarre pro-xbox and pro-winxp threads on this board.
      Well, by the same logic I could claim that Linus must be personally funding Linux astroturfing campaigns - witness the recent bizarre pro-Linux threads that I think I may have seen once or twice.

      Oh, and I am one of the people who frequently defends Microsoft against uninformed attacks; note that I work for a company who develops for Linux/Apache/PHP/MySQL. And I've yet to receive a brown envelope containing pay from Microsoft.

      I see the benefits of OSS, esp. Linux on servers, but I also see the benefit of Windows on client machines. To dismiss this attitude as clearly indicating astroturfing is childish. And finally, at the time of writing your comment has had a +1 mod, whereas the parent you referred to has not been modded at all.
    6. Re:This *is* news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but i seriously doubt many moderation points are wasted because 'oh! he doesn't like michael!'

      The authors have unlimited mod points (thereby destroying the moderation system, but I digress). So no points are "wasted", cause he can moderate to his hearts content.

    7. Re:This *is* news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There appear to be some problems in your logic. And why would you be so angry?

    8. Re:This *is* news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You go girl! They don't even have a history of that kind of behaviour.

    9. Re:This *is* news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'have you stopped beating your wife yet?'

      'when did you stop follwing the party directives, comrade?'

      '2 + 2 = 5'

    10. Re:This *is* news by gazbo · · Score: 1
      No-one denies they have a (deplorable) history of astroturfing, but my point was that this article is about Microsoft using a different way of communicating with testers, not about Microsoft astroturfing. I suspect the original poster got no further than reading that Microsoft were actively posting about the product, before he posted about astroturfing.

      For the other ACs who replied
      • Angry? On re-reading, guilty as charged. I was having a bad day.
      • ...stop following the party directives...Touché
      • Bad logic? The only bad logic was a parody of the original poster's logic. If it weren't bad I wouldn't have posted it!

      Now to hassle the fool who just tried to hack port 139
  11. Advocate in newsgroups? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    ...advocate their embedded products in online newsgroups

    Does that include slashdot?

    Guess we shall see who the real microsoft plants are in slashdot by the responses to this article... :)

    (I remember the good ole days when you never heard a pro-microsoft rant on slashdot... :)

    1. Re:Advocate in newsgroups? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does indeed include slashdot. Microsoft has been recruiting astroturfers, and we are witnessing the results.

    2. Re:Advocate in newsgroups? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The company plants are often so obvious, it should be possible to keep a list of the account names. Maybe slashdot should offer the ability to hide astroturf posts.

  12. Microsoft invents Customer Feedback by s20451 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That perception, Microsoft says, is precisely why everyone on the development team of its Talisker embedded operating system now logs hours every week, chatting about the OS in news groups, checking out "bug reports" on a dedicated Web site and meeting with users face-to-face at "plugfests," where they discuss Talisker programming experiences.

    Congrats to Microsoft for inventing web based bug tracking. Truly this is a great day for software.

    --
    Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    1. Re:Microsoft invents Customer Feedback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i don't see the claim in that paragraph that they invented, mearly they are using it. surely you won't chide them for that? not to mention visual sourcesafe makes whatever GNU hippie program de jour look like a joke.

    2. Re:Microsoft invents Customer Feedback by Canadria · · Score: 2, Interesting

      i don't see the claim in that paragraph that they invented, mearly they are using it. surely you won't chide them for that? not to mention visual sourcesafe makes whatever GNU hippie program de jour look like a joke.

      I myself use Windows, I am pro-windows in many ways, but even to me posts like this look like MS trolls.

      Examine it closely for a moment.....

      Point #1: Lack of proper capitalization.
      This seems to be very common in MS trolls. I figure either they have no shift keys or do so many of these posts a minute that the keystroke required to hit shift actually represents a significant time cost.

      Point #2: Mentioning a product by MS
      MS Trolls are almost frightening in their ability to reference ANY MS product in a statement. In most cases, the product reference is either usually garbage or not related to the topic at hand.

      Point #3: Taking shots at open source
      Every MS troll seems to bash open source at every available opportunity. The open standards/source/etc are evil arguments are always a sure sign.

      Point #3a: People who use anything open are
      Why is it that pro-MS people always refer to everybody who isn't as a Timothy Leary type, acid-dropping hippy freak hanging out at Berkley and coding BSD to bring down the man.

      -Canadria

      Oh well,
      Another Rant Bites the Dust

    3. Re:Microsoft invents Customer Feedback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you just advocate visual source safe? ROTFLMAO! That has to be the absolute worst peice of shit source control system ever invented. The only way I could ever even STAND to use it was in combination with the rest of MS Visual Studio. If you want to do anything some high school MS programmer didn't think of, you are SOL.

  13. I'm not surprised... by pi+radians · · Score: 2, Funny

    "this will be used in slot machines and ATMs"

    So a Microsoft product is going to be responsible for a machine that takes a whole bunch of money. Who else is a little nervous about all of this?

    --

    sin(6cos(r)+5A)
    1. Re:I'm not surprised... by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      "this will be used in slot machines and ATMs"
      Well, it's always been somewhat of a gamble ;-)

    2. Re:I'm not surprised... by TheCrunch · · Score: 1

      They do that anyway.

      --
      My life is one big siesta in which I'm dreaming I wished my life was one big siesta.
    3. Re:I'm not surprised... by DavidpFitz · · Score: 1

      In Bangkok, a cash machine robbed my card. A couple of seconds later, I was amazed to find a Windows dialogue box telling me iexplore.exe has crashed! What nutter designs a cash point using IE as the interface. It was literally a touch screen device, and you could click on links.

      Not really funny since my card had a huge bill rang up on it in a matter of hours (yes, I did cancel it!) presumable by the guy who services the machine!

    4. Re:I'm not surprised... by josh253 · · Score: 1

      Hmm... come to think of it, the ATM wouldn't process my request this morning. Perhaps it's already here. I'll probably get a copy of Windows XP in the mail now, having paid for it unwittingly at the MSWells Fargo kiosk.

    5. Re:I'm not surprised... by anaticula · · Score: 1

      At least one major bank in Sweden uses MS products for their ATMs already. They usually work as well as others but sure, a BSOD has been spotted every once in a while...

    6. Re:I'm not surprised... by gleam_mn · · Score: 1

      Shhhhhh! given microsofts history involving floating-point processors, if we all just keep quiet then maybe we can all get rich!

      --
      - The auditors said to secure the server... hand me that duct-tape -
    7. Re:I'm not surprised... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would someone please explain to me the difference between a slot machine and a Microsoft ATM? After all, considering the reliability of MS software, you'll never know if you're going to get money from that ATM.

      Oh, wait. I know the difference. The slot machine just takes coins. The ATM can access your checking account.

      Microsoft should ignore the slot machine market altogether. After all, the ATM market will put slot machines out of business.

      I post anonymous coward because I'm even more paranoid than the rest of the slashdot crowd.

  14. Will they put M$ logos on the machines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems to me that microsoft tries to get everyone to put thier logo on everything. So will the offending slot machines and ATMs have the M$ logo? If so that would practically be inviting people to get free money.

  15. Embedded disk by Burritos · · Score: 1
    Has anybody ever used the QNX Demo DIsk?

    Seems like a good solution to me.

    1. Re:Embedded disk by silicon_synapse · · Score: 1

      I tried it a while back. It's very impressive. You can download an ISO of the full OS and most of it's packages at http://get.qnx.com/download/ for free.

    2. Re:Embedded disk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why would one leech the demodisk if he can download the whole personal edition cdrom for free on their site ?

    3. Re:Embedded disk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep websurfing on a floppy, thats true leetness.
      hehe

    4. Re:Embedded disk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only wish that it included an IRC client. IRC from any computer with a modem :)
      even my old 386..

    5. Re:Embedded disk by ScumBiker · · Score: 1

      QNX kicks ass. I've installed it on a 16mb 75mhz Packard Hell box I had laying around (not sure where the hell that came from...). Beautiful OS, one of the best I think I've ever seen. Small, fast, hell, I'm thinking about putting it on a bigger box and trying it as a desktop for a while.

      --
      --- Think of it as evolution in action ---
  16. Finally Learning From The Open Source Community by Carnage4Life · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While I was at MSFT over the summer, a friend at work asked me why Open Source projects had such a community around them no matter how small they were while it seemed harder for MSFT products to build a community around them (as opposed to users which they had plenty of). He mistakenly assumed that the availability of source code was what built the community which from my minor participation in a number of Open Source projects was incorrect.

    The main reason users tend to form a community around Open Source projects is that there is direct communication between the users of the product and the developers of the product without the layer of bullshit introduced by marketing and management. If I post to the dbXML, Scoop or JDEE mailing list, I know I'll get at least one response from an actual developer of the product who will make a solid attempt to solve my problem as opposed to paying umpteen dollars to be put on hold by some pimply faced teenager who probably couldn't code his way out of a paper bag.

    While at MSFT I planned to evangelize such a user-centric view of interaction but never got around to doing it on as large a scale as I liked. I did however try my best to make sure that as many questions to the newsgroup of our product were answered by someone at MSFT, if not me then someone whom I felt could answer the question. It looks that finally some like minded people are springing up in other parts of MSFT.

    1. Re:Finally Learning From The Open Source Community by barneyfoo · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      Why do you want to support microsoft's corperate policy of monopoly maintainence and slowed innovation. They've stated that the best way to control your business environment is to dictate the pace of innovation (both slower and faster).

      I mean you seem like a nice guy, but you do realize that Microsoft want's to control software universe and be the gateway to your wallet, dont you? Do they really need your help? You seem like a bright guy.

      People say you have to separate the company from the employees - that MS has really nice, bright employees. I think you can say that the employees who avidly support Microsoft's world-domination strategy (Ok, maybe the janitors in redmond dont quite grasp that point) should maybe be held responsable (ethically) for their complicity in it. I pray (wish, hope) that MS will fail in their global domination strategy. And I hope talented people dont further their evil ways.

    2. Re:Finally Learning From The Open Source Community by iguana · · Score: 2, Insightful

      IMO, the main difference between the MS and Open Source/GNU community is the OS/GNU folks are passionate about the technology itself. The MS people want a solution to their problem. MS provides that solution quickly and easily.

      One of the genius things MS has done is to provide one and only one solution to the problem. Speeds up development for people who want to get the project *done*. Most businesses aren't interested in beautiful technology or ideal code. The have a problem and need a solution, quickly and easily.

      Communities tend to form around people who enjoy a particular activity at least partially for the sake of the activity itself. OS/GNU people enjoy computers. I'm not sure MS's efforts will create a community with members that have any interest other than their own problems.

      When there is only one solution to the problem, why get together and discuss it? People will pop up, ask a question, get The Answer, then disappear. The most frequent posters will be the flamers with an axe to grind and MS employees.

    3. Re:Finally Learning From The Open Source Community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trying to convert Microslut from their
      money mongering attitude is like
      trying to get the devil to pray to Jesus.

      It's just NOT GOING TO Happen.

    4. Re:Finally Learning From The Open Source Community by Ami+Ganguli · · Score: 2

      Are you sure that's the reason? Amiga nuts, BBSers, and Apple II users all had communities in their day.

      I think the main reason for a Linux community is that many Linux users actually enjoy working with their OS. Tinkering is an end unto itself. MS products just aren't as much fun to play with, so the technical people that would build a community don't use it.

      I know I'm biased, but honestly it's been my experience that highly technical people - the ones who enjoy their work - prefer Unix and Linux. Most of the MS administrators are just in it for the money. If street cleaning paid as well then they'd be doing that.

      --
      It is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail. - Abraham Maslow
    5. Re:Finally Learning From The Open Source Community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      paying umpteen dollars to be put on hold by some pimply faced teenager who probably couldn't code his way out of a paper bag

      Interesting! As like probably many of you I know this experience of waiting on hold forever and finally reaching an incompetent helpdesk person. Rarely, maybe reach someone competent and very helpful. I too have been on the other side dishin out the helpdesk, but it was mostly networking stuff and nothing about code. Currently, I am taking a class on C programming, a relative newbie, so this seems like a challenge because if I were to be in the situation of having to deal with a pimply faced teenager I at least better know how to code myself out of a paper bag! So how to begin?

      #include
      #include "brownbag.h"

      int main(void)
      {
      if (brownbag = 1)
      exit;
      return 0;
      }


      Since, I am only learning C right now, that's all I know. But maybe it might be better to use Java, python, perl, I now sure, but I'm learning. Is there a sourceforge project for coding out of a paper bag or a HOWTO? Or is coding out of a paper bag closed source proprietary code? Thinking about this and not completely knowing how to code myself out of a paperbag I think twice about who may be on the other end now of that help desk.

    6. Re:Finally Learning From The Open Source Community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "community is the OS/GNU folks are passionate about the technology itself. "

      OS perhaps, but surely not GNU folks.
      GNU people are following set of very stiff social ( not technological) rules, which they apply regardless of technological issues involved.

      12356 stupid key forms

    7. Re:Finally Learning From The Open Source Community by praxim · · Score: 1

      Funny, your paper bag code contains errors. Back to those C classes. =)

    8. Re:Finally Learning From The Open Source Community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect slashdot's formatting removed his system bracketed statement from the first include and thought it was html or something.

    9. Re:Finally Learning From The Open Source Community by zulux · · Score: 2

      The main reason users tend to form a community around Open Source projects is that there is direct communication

      No The reason users for a community around Open Source is beacue Open Source doesen't try to scew them with vendor-lock in, buggy software and illegal business practices. Face it, Microsoft is not liked amung computing profesionals due to Microsofts bad behavour to its customers.

      We are jelous of the popularity of Microsoft either: Apache is the most used web-server and everybody likes them. Cicso is popular, and we like them as well. Hell, we like Nintendo of all companies, better than Microsoft.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    10. Re:Finally Learning From The Open Source Community by arjennienhuis · · Score: 1

      brownbag.h:

      #define = ==

      int brownbag;

    11. Re:Finally Learning From The Open Source Community by cygnusx · · Score: 2

      >Most of the MS administrators are just in
      >it for the money. If street cleaning paid
      >as well then they'd be doing that.

      Oversimplification. Just MS admins != greedy capitalist b******d.

      There are many sysadmins I know of who take great pride in their being able to manage a AD system spread over 4 continents with ease. Who keep it secure from day one. Who maintain 16- and 32-way Datacenter systems.

      And: there are a number of MS oriented *developers* I know who would not even consider consider the CLI-centric Unix tools to be real programs. Like you put a premium on power and expressiveness, they put a premium on ease of use, visual slickness and usability by your grandmother.

      So all it boils down to is different worldviews.

  17. Jackpot! by Martigan80 · · Score: 0

    So you have to have a passport account before you put a quarter in? Or will the Jackpot be a system malfunction?

    --
    This SIG pulled due to lack of funding. (This damn war is costing too much!)
  18. Oxymoron? by jspectre · · Score: 1

    Given M$ ability to create bloatware I wonder what their small, light-weight, embedded XP systems look like? Hmm... a Pentium IV with 256M of RAM?

    eXtra Puddin...

    --

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  19. We've always been out listening by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 4, Troll

    It's just that we don't identify ourselves by our names. Most of us have always been like me: when we comment, we acknowledge our association with MS, but we don't give out any identifying information. I pass on the commentary that I pick up here to my product group. Frankly, I think that the Pocket PC is stronger for it.

    There are two classes of reasons that we don't use our real names. First, we as individuals don't want to get spammed any more than we already do. Individuals from MS have been targeted and stalked in the past; none of us wants to be the victim of some kook. Second, the company has a right to manage its own messages. Sometimes, obviously, that's a bad thing; our quiet lets the company get away with lying. Usually, though, there are a number of of people who have the right to know before the public does. (Our partners, for instance, may need to adjust their strategies in response to changes that we make along the way in our own. There's nothing so humiliating as not knowing some key point about a change, and having some reporter tell you that he just read all about it in a newsgroup.) We need to protect that orderly flow of information.

    1. Re:We've always been out listening by FreeUser · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Most of us have always been like me: when we comment, we acknowledge our association with MS,

      ahem. Some of you acknowledge your bias, however many, many of you do not. So much so, and on so many occasions, that Microsoft astroturfing has become a cliche on slashdot, kuro5hin, and numerous other forums.

      We need to protect that orderly flow of information.

      Which underscores Microsoft's philosophy (and to be fair, others. Let's not forget Disney's cosponsorship ... excuse me, cosupport, of a bill that would have banned most free software, not to mention other activities by the RIAA and MPAA as well) of why they are trying to hijack the internet and sqelch the "unorderly" information that has abounded since the formation of the Internet and in particular the world wide web, empowering anyone to speak out and share their opinion and whatever information they may have in a very organic and most unorderly fashion.

      Please, spare us the insult to our intelligence by trying to rewrite Microsoft's most recent history in its interaction with this site, the free software community, and the internet at large. Such flimsy attempts to mislead the public are only amusing for so long and I, for one, grow weary of such nonsense.

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    2. Re:We've always been out listening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "none of us wants to be the victim of some kook"

      Is Bill Gates a
      1) Normal person
      2) Technological genius working for the benefit of all mankind.
      3) A capitalist hell bent on exploiting society just for the challenge (some kook).

      I think the answer is obviously C) so all MS employees are "victims of some kook" already

    3. Re:We've always been out listening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No he is the godfather of open source, you idiot.


      - Not A Microsoft Employee

    4. Re:We've always been out listening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Of course you don't use your names. That way a small group of MS fanatics can create multiple accounts to push the FUD of the day.

      So what you are saying is that Ballmer is a normal person?

      Scary.

      We've always been out listening

      So who is stalking who?

    5. Re:We've always been out listening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. I thought that said "goatfather."

  20. Re:Screw XP by silicon_synapse · · Score: 1

    Then go with QNX or something. It's light and designed from the ground up for embedded systems; not a scaled down behemoth squeezed into another market. Every OS has it's place. Windows just isn't a good idea for an embedded system (though it may do it's job adequately).

  21. Passport? by s.a.m · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now I know this probably won't happen..but the mention of ATM got my attention.

    Wouldn't the use of and embeded version of XP, which will be used for authentication and disbursement of monies, be an incentive for MS to get people and banks to use it's Passport service for authentication/verification etc?

    Think about it. They want to get spending data etc, so this would be the perfect opportunity. Now I'm not bashing MS for making an embeded version of XP.

    We all know CE wasn't the best...but still are making money out of it and they can most likely capitalize on XP's new features.

    Personally I'd stick w/ whatever was already out there for the banking systems...I trust them more than I do MS.

    1. Re:Passport? by siphoncolder · · Score: 1

      "Personally I'd stick w/ whatever was already out there for the banking systems...I trust them more than I do MS."

      sometimes that works..

      but isn't that what banks did for say, 30 years or so, and then spend billions/trillions of dollars worldwide upgrading 'cause of Y2K ? remember the fear & commotion? did you get interest additions of several negative thousands of dollars added to your account?

      yeah, i trust banks more than MS...

      --
      i'm amazed that i survived - an airbag saved my life.
    2. Re:Passport? by Unipuma · · Score: 1

      I hardly think that banks would be eager to switch to something as new, untried and controversial as Passport anytime in the next ten years.
      Considering they still mostly use Cobol for their core applications because of the proven reliability of those systems, and fear of problems when changing to something new, Passport would probably be furthest from a bank managers mind.

    3. Re:Passport? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who has the accountability, however?
      Banks, or MS.

    4. Re:Passport? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hardly think [insert business name here] would be eager to try something as new, untried and contoversial as Open Source anytime in the next ten years.

    5. Re:Passport? by alcmena · · Score: 1

      Banks are a little different. I hope they don't go to open source any time soon either.

      About huge majority of the companies in America can completely hose their systems tomorrow and it's unlikely to have a big impact on me. If, however, the bank hoses my account, that could end up costing me a lot of money..

      I think this holds true for a lot of people. (Aside from Dot commers, of course. They don't have a lot of money to lose anymore.)

  22. Re:Screw XP by maj12_lovebuzz · · Score: 1

    What's linux?

  23. Re:Screw XP by t_logan_MCSE · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    QNX's outdated monolithic kernel cannot compare with the colorForth-based microkernel architecture used in embedded XP.

    QNX might have more marketing dollars than Microsoft, but the better product will win eventually.

  24. Slot machines are a natural fit for MS... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2, Troll

    ...as historically, slot machines have often been found to be controlled by criminal organizations. After they were affirmed guilty by the appeals court, MS realized that slot machine control was a natural extension of their business plan.

  25. Re:Screw XP by maj12_lovebuzz · · Score: 1

    Nice ColorForth reset, d00d!

  26. ZDNet article by n-tone · · Score: 1

    Here's the link. In this article, Microsoft says that it ties in nicely with the .NET vision.
    I've a new slogan for Microsoft. : Everything is .NET today.

    1. Re:ZDNet article by n-tone · · Score: 1

      I forgot a question : is the X-Box ready for .NET ?

  27. So what does this mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Great, we have to call the fuckers to activate our money? "You have added money to your account, please call Microsoft at 1-888-MS-OWNS-U to reactivate it. Remember, if you modify your account too often, we will disable your account."

    1. Re:So what does this mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Remember, if you modify your account too often, we will disable your account."

      Actually... you can load money you just can't save money.

      -J

  28. slots and atms? by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    So I'll be able to sit at home from my linux box and make these things spit out cash?

    Everyone knows rebooting a windows machine removes any password protections etc[unless you do this in the bios].

    What happens when I hit the million dollar jackpot and get a Fatal Error because winblows can't keep up with the math?

    1. Re:slots and atms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>> What happens when I hit the million dollar jackpot and get a Fatal Error because
      >>>winblows can't keep up with the math?

      Wouldn't be hard to believe that The Chief Architect came up with a way to ensure that all you got to keep were the 8LSDs (including those after the decimal point), and he kept the MSDs for himself.

  29. All the time. by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 3, Flamebait

    At least five times a week, I see some sort of windows based kiosk type device screwing up.

    Recently:

    The information terminals at MCI Center (they have never worked properly, to my knowledge- they are always off, talkatively crashed, or frozen.)

    Newer Allfirst ATMs (which all use Windows 2000.)

    The terminals at the Baltimore Convention Center (the OS keeps forgetting it has a touchscreen, oops.)

    If I know what's running on something, that generally means I've seen it crash! The only Linux-based device I saw having problems was a group of web terminals at a New Jersey Turnpike rest area. But they were in a pretty deplorable state from all points, and those were just glorified PCs anyway (one was reporting a keyboard failure at the BIOS, no surprise since it seemed that someone had heavily worked it over with an ice pick)

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

    1. Re:All the time. by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 1

      Lets not forget the automated ticketing machines at movie theaters. I know why they keep about 10 or so around, because 90% of the time 8 of them aren't working. I end up just walking around until I find a machine that isn't blue screened or WinCE isn't complaining that it found new hardware . It just gets annoying, that's all.

    2. Re:All the time. by PlaysWithMatches · · Score: 1

      At least five times a week, I see some sort of windows based kiosk type device screwing up.

      Yeah, I saw an example of this when I was in Denmark... I was in the main train station in Copenhagen, and every single schedule kiosk for getting train info, etc. was crashed. And guess what I saw? The blue screen of death. Shortly thereafter, they all changed to a Windows NT boot-up screen, before promptly crashing again.

      --

      Mozilla's a nice operating system, but it needs a better browser.
    3. Re:All the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another fun (frustrating) place to see Windows crash is the gift registry kiosks at Target.

    4. Re:All the time. by xbrownx · · Score: 0

      So is it Linux's fault or New Jersey's?

      Don't blame my state :)

    5. Re:All the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how with the windows instances it was only necessary to say "Windows crashed, it sucks" but where there was a linux problem the whole thing was grossly rationalized. "Well, the machines sucked, the people were idiots, and there were little bits of shit stuck to the keyboard so its no wonder those linux terminals broke!" Oh well, what else could one expect from /.

    6. Re:All the time. by kiwiunixman · · Score: 0

      Who the hell would buy ATMS from anyone else besides IBM or NCR? Lets be totally bloody honest here. Its like buying a super computer from Compaq with Windows 2000 pre-loaded, not a smart move.

      --
      I am the resident BOFH (Bastard Operator From Hell) If you don't like it, you can go [# rm -rf /home
    7. Re:All the time. by gray+code · · Score: 1

      But they were in a pretty deplorable state from all points you mean New Jersey?

    8. Re:All the time. by hairyian · · Score: 1

      Funny how with the windows instances it was only necessary to say "Windows crashed, it sucks" but where there was a linux problem the whole thing was grossly rationalized.

      I've seen this as well, but then... there is another aspect to it. When windows BSODs... I almost never know why. It's always a random death. The times when I have seen kernel panics or faults under Linux systems they're generally because I have done something insanely stupid and I can tell what I've done wrong. I don't need to 'rationalise' - I can say that if I try and boot Linux with this thing wrong then it whines...

      Shame you just can't do the same thing with windows...

      Ian Woods

  30. XP in Las Vegas by KarmaBlackballed · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows that whenever you install Windows on a machine you are already gambling with your reliability. Putting it on slot machines is a natural!

    --

    --- -- - -
    Give me LIBERTY, or give me a check.
  31. Re:Screw XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    QNX might have more marketing dollars than Microsoft, but the better product will win eventually.

    wtf?

  32. M$ is finally getting it!!! by tercero · · Score: 2, Interesting
    As the quote on M$s site: "We wanted to have all the rich features of Windows XP for the desktop but in a small footprint. Windows XP Embedded enables us to build our device image in a small footprint and gives us all of the features we need to support our design."

    This is what users have been screaming for on their desktops. Food for thought.

  33. Confused by 4of12 · · Score: 2

    So, like, how does this XP embedded fit into an overall strategy that has seen WinCE and even NT embedded?

    This seems to be one of those corporate gaffes.

    Remember 1994 and Java?

    "What a great programming language - I know! - let's tie it in as Web client!"

    Along the same lines 2001:

    "I know! This .NET is such a great thing we'll shove into those hot new "embedded devices" everyone is talking about!"

    <forehead wrinkles>

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  34. Re:Screw XP by ethereal · · Score: 1

    There are plenty of people who came into computing from a desktop PC background, have never known anything but Microsoft, and thus always choose the Microsoft solution for every project they work on. They've never known anything better, and in fact are unable to evaluate "better" in any terms other than the ones Microsoft has supplied. I work with a number of these people. Pity me :)

    --

    Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  35. Hardly uncommunicative... by argStyopa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.newsfactor.com/perl/story/13046.html : August 23,2001: "Utah attorney general Mark Shurtleff says that at least two of the more than 400 letters his office has received in support of Bill Gates' Microsoft were from people who had died.
    Microsoft Corporation (Nasdaq: MSFT), in its quest to sway states' attorneys general into settling antitrust charges still filed against it, has apparently orchestrated what was originally thought to be a grassroots letter-writing campaign in support of the company, the Los Angeles Times has reported."

    Methinks they doth communicate too much.
    [I'd rather have linked to the /. report of this story, but searching /. on "Microsoft" and "phony" brought up too damn many references.]

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:Hardly uncommunicative... by linzeal · · Score: 1

      You don't get it, do you? Microsoft is so great that even your dead grandmother feels obligated to tell the authorities about this travesty of justice.

    2. Re:Hardly uncommunicative... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://lists.essential.org/1998/am-info/msg01529.h tml

  36. the last thing we need.. by gonar · · Score: 2

    [RANT]

    the last thing we need is a slowr cash machine with pretty colors.

    my bank just replaced all their old, green screen, keypad operated cash machines with new, color touch screen cash machines.

    guess what. it takes twice as long to get cash from the new machine.

    guess what. visually impaired people can't use the new machines, because there is no brail facility.

    sure they are pretty.

    I don't want pretty in a cash machine, I WANT CASH!

    I don't want slow in a cash machine, I WANT FAST!

    now, on top of slow color touchscreens, they are going to add winXP???

    it will take 3 days and an air conditioned 8Ghz pentium4 to get my $20, when 30 seconds and a z80 used to be sufficient.

    [/RANT]

    --
    The difference between Theory and Practice is greater in Practice than in Theory.
    1. Re:the last thing we need.. by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      I've seen this with a lot of stuff lately. Honestly, I think computers and networks were generally faster 8-10 years ago than they are now.
      I remember using Unix email over slow modems years ago, and it was much faster than reading my work email on Outlook is now. Doing anything over a network was instantaneous; now it's ridiculously slow even though network speeds are much greater and computers are much faster. Just doing an 'ls' on my work computer can take 20 seconds to get a directory from a networked drive, whereas on the Unix systems 8 years ago, I couldn't tell if a directory was on a local drive or NFS.

      Bank machines back in the 80's were better too: I remember using machines that had small "viewports" that could be swivelled up and down (useful for tall and short people). These machines had all-text displays, but worked very reliably. Now, machines have buttons next to the display whose function changes depending on what you're doing, but if you're very tall, you have to stoop to see which button corresponds to the arrow on the screen due to parallax. Plus, it's easy for bystanders to watch the screen while it's showing your account balance.

      Computers may be faster than they were 10 years ago, but are they more functional? I don't think so.

    2. Re:the last thing we need.. by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2
      I don't want pretty in a cash machine, I WANT CASH!
      I don't want slow in a cash machine, I WANT FAST!

      While you are standing at a cash machine, waiting for your money, the new pretty screens can flash you information about your bank's available services. People's attentions are harder to draw these days and a marketing opportunity to a captive set of eyeballs could not be passed up. Yes, it sucks. But if it's important enough for you, vote with your feet and switch banks.

      WIAFM

      Amen...

      --
      That is all.
    3. Re:the last thing we need.. by lynx_user_abroad · · Score: 1

      Another one of those little engineering principles of life...

      Any computer, of whatever arbitrary technology or expense, will only allow you to do 80% of what you want it to do.
      The other 20% is composed of things you never dreamed were possible until you upgraded to the system under inspection.

      It follows the same reasoning that no mater how much disk space you add, you'll always run out within a few months.

      In this equation, the people are the constant; the provision of greater resources encourages the demand for even greater resources.

      Which is why IT departments that try to decrease cost and increase efficiency by replacing obsolete models with the latest and greatest new ones invariably wind up (to their utter bafflement) increasing cost and decreasing efficiency.

      --

      The thing about things we don't know is we often don't know we don't know them.

    4. Re:the last thing we need.. by mgblst · · Score: 1

      ahhh, here you have discovered the root of most problems. If i go up to someone on the street and ask them to turn around and bendover, they will either run or hit me, but if a bank or similar corporation does the same thing, then people will whinge, come on slashdot and complain, but still spread there cheeks. Apathy, best friend of the corporate villian.

  37. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  38. The return of Sircam? by MongooseCN · · Score: 3, Funny

    How long until Sircam starts transfering money from one persons ATM machine to another?

    I send you this financial transaction in order to have your advice.

  39. re: by eledo69 · · Score: 1

    I think the key issues here are size and power consumption. I think Microsoft has figured out how to make their software stable , but they've traded stabled for bloated code. While this is fine for the desktop world of 20+ gb hard drives.. this proves a serious hurdle for anything that can't afford it.

  40. Let's get something straight right now. by Cutriss · · Score: 2

    NO. I sincerely doubt you can imagine a Beowulf cluster of these. And if you can, you're a retard.

    --
    "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    1. Re:Let's get something straight right now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I can imagine it. 500 slot machines reduced to one big, networked doorstop that glows blue.

  41. How far did CE really go ? by SnapperHead · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe I am still living in my cave (urr, office) but how many devices did actually have CE in it. Outside of the normal PDA. I have seen and heard about Linux (and BSD) being in things like, printers, "plug-and-play" servers (like those toys from Colbalt), etc.

    There is a machine at the family business called a Holtzma. Its a German made saw. Its made to cut entire books of plywood (MCP, pine, or whatever). They have 3 of them, one with simple switches which is *VERY* old. The second has a digital display but looks like a custom OS. The newest one has a Windows machine build in. (I can't wait for the day when I walk by, see the blue seen of death, and get to say those famous words :)

    Anyway, the point behind the saw is that this would be the perfect place for Linux. The PC running it currently has to be a fast machine, becuase of the Windows requirements. Linux however, could use much lower requirements. Plus, take a window manager like blackbox, or other small window manager, to make it simple, small, nice user interface. Since people aren't using things like office suites, you could rip a lot of crap out of it.

    Security on such a machine is also a big concern. Wouldn't it be great if your employee didn't feel like working that day, fired up regedit and made a few small changes ? You could imagine all of the other things that could be done. Since its Windows, theres always a false sense of security.

    I assume in a few years companys like them would start getting smarter about it. People don't want propritary systems, they want something simple and small. Windows, has too many toys built into it that can't be removed. Plus, when you start looking at the outrages licensing ammounts for Windows. Linux, starts looking VERY nice.

    To get Linux being used in a serious way, alls it would take is for a large PDA company like Palm to start offearing it on a few Palm Pilots. (Maybe create a few models with it, just to test the waters). People would start fogetting about Palm OS pretty quick. Other companys would surley follow.
    </soapbox>

    --
    until (succeed) try { again(); }
    1. Re:How far did CE really go ? by WasterDave · · Score: 2

      The PC running it currently has to be a fast machine, becuase of the Windows requirements. Linux however, could use much lower requirements.

      Thing is, when you're making an automated saw for $100k, you don't give a toss about what kind of computer is needed to run it. You care about:
      a, Making people buy the saw.
      b, Making sure it doesn't break down.

      And point b is where Linux wins. Even if we assume that NT doesn't fall over, you're still going to need a hard drive purely from a bloat point of view. In the embedded arena one huge advantage Linux has is that it can be put on 2Mb of flash that is soldered to the board. No moving parts = very happy automated saw manufacturer. Reducing the number of cables, connectors, fans etc. must also not be overlooked as a major way of increasing reliability of embedded systems.

      Wouldn't it be great if your employee didn't feel like working that day, fired up regedit and made a few small changes ?

      Not a problem, NT embedded wouldn't even have regedit on it.

      Plus, when you start looking at the outrages licensing ammounts for Windows. Linux, starts looking VERY nice.

      NT Embedded is $70/licence. Again, nothing in the $100k saw, especially if it reduces development costs. The good thing is that Linux is getting such a stronghold in the embedded arena that it looks very unlikely that developing for embedded NT would prove cost effective.

      a large PDA company like Palm to start offearing it on a few Palm Pilots

      Problems with the design requirements for low power kernels. A low power kernel basically has to get the processor back to sleep ASAP. Multi-user requirements (for instance) take a major back seat here. Luckily processors are getting much more efficient and moore's law is looking to pick up Linux on it's curve as it goes past. Go look at the power consumption vs mips figures for the Intel Xscale. Bloody stunning.

      Dave

      PS. Check out this bitch, then rejoice, for Linux rules in embedded.

      --
      I write a blog now, you should be afraid.
  42. new bug in IE 12.0:cross-bank-account scripting by kipple · · Score: 2, Funny

    ---
    new advisory posted XX-XX-XXXX (date censored due to DMCA violations).

    description: new bug in IE version 12, default on all windows embedded applications (including ATM, slot machines, car stereo systems).

    quick description: by using some malformed ATM-cards, an attacker can inject a code that will make IE cross-jump between bank accounts, and therefore access the internals of the account. The string has been sent to microsoft for further analyzation, and hopefully they will give an Obscure Patch within the next eight months.

    personal considerations: perhaps in a world of full-disclosure, microsoft would give a patch in few days and save zillions of ATM users, but surely this system could be used by terrorists to subvert the US banking system. so censoring advisories is a good idea.
    ---

    --
    -- There are two kind of sysadmins: Paranoids and Losers. (adapted from D. Bach)
  43. Uncommunicative? by HiThere · · Score: 2

    I get spam from them all the time! How can you say uncommunicative?

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  44. innovation is key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems like microsoft is all too happy to innovate on the desktop to get rid of competition (look at media player and IE), but will SLOW down innovation in competing environments. The killing of bluetooth is an example where Microsoft thought that ubiquitous handheld devices could kill a future project of theirs (.NET), and so they got rid of all support for any facet of that platform.

    1. Re:innovation is key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and exactly which competition have they gotten rid of? Last I checked Opera was making some good headway in the market along with Netscape coming back from the dead and the slew of new browsers based off the Mozilla and Gecko code. I have yet to see Winamp, Real, or Apple state that they were getting out of the media market. Additionally there are a large number of other companies coming out with new media players. So explain to me again how the market is being stifled? Are Caldera, Red Hat, Mandrake, or any of the other distro companies out there being anti-competitive by bundling ftp, media players, webservers, smtp servers, browsers, e-mail, telnet, window managers, firewall, proxy,.....? Or is it the attitude of "What's good for the goose is good for the gander?".

      I think this is all very hypocritical. Marc Andreeson said just before win 95 came out that he didn't want to put Netscape Navigator on the shelf at the store, he wanted to have it bundled with the OS and distributed by the OEM's. He knew that would help solidify his market share. Then when MS did this same thing he cried foul. So why was it the right thing for him but the wrong thing for them?

      As for EmbeddedXP... man talk about a bunch of snobbery in this group. "A real 'Embedded' device is.... blah blah blah blah". It's like saying the only REAL computer is a C-64 or the only REAL game platform is the Playstation. Embedded systems are those that are typically part of a larger machine. The embedded system can be contained within a single microprocessor but is not a requirement to be considered embedded. The key factor in determining whether the system is embedded is how the primary code is stored and accessed. This code in embedded systems is held is some solid state storage medium (i.e. ROM). While secondary code may be accessed from another medium like a hard drive, flash, or optical device these are all secondary devices not directly part of the embedded system. The size of the end device, type of processor, amount of memory, OS or program being run are not the determining factors of whether or not it is an embedded system.

      From what I can see and have read about WinXP embedded is that it's modular design allows for you to decrease the feature set to only those required by the device. This would allow you to build robust devices with media and network facilities or build less robust devices for simple information display. WinCE is similar in that you could scale back what features you wanted/needed to build into your device and get a smaller footprint for the operating system. One popular system that uses a scaled down version of WinCE and is considered an embedded system is the Sega DreamCast. Powerful processor, plenty of memory, robust, embedded, and runs WinCE (or really the OS of your choice).

      Call me a troll or an MS shill, but if you are going to do so at least argue with some FACTS.

    2. Re:innovation is key by Cerebus · · Score: 1

      I think this is all very hypocritical. Marc Andreeson said just before win 95 came out that he didn't want to put Netscape Navigator on the shelf at the store, he wanted to have it bundled with the OS and distributed by the OEM's. He knew that would help solidify his market share. Then when MS did this same thing he cried foul. So why was it the right thing for him but the wrong thing for them?


      Because MS is a monopoly in desktop OSes, and when you're a monopoly the rules are different. This is the essence of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. It was and is foul for MS to bundle products.

      --
      -- Cerebus
    3. Re:innovation is key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad the appeals court didn't agree (read their opinion) -- It might be foul, but legal. MS was a baddie for preventing Netscape from also being bundled tho.

  45. Rebate! by Apreche · · Score: 2

    20$ rebate on all windows xp purchases! Just find an XP enabled ATM machine, call microsoft on your cell phone, and type in your registration key into the ATM, and you get 20$ free! (Microsoft will not steal personal information from you, such as your bank account number or which ATM machines at which banks you go to. However Microsoft is not responsible if your money is stolen due to security holes in the ATM's embedded operating system.)

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
  46. XP Embedded? please. by Atilla · · Score: 1

    The start menu alone will take up 90% of the screen on any decent PDA!

    heh heh.

    --
    --- sig moved for great justice.
  47. Valuable criticism is never harsh? by imrdkl · · Score: 1
    From the article (concerning developer chat): "Sometimes the feedback is harsh but they can still give valuable criticism."

    I guess it's fortunate they don't have to meet some of their customers in person. There are some really angry people out there right now.

  48. its still too big... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the company i'm at is having problems getting this on anything smaller than a 128 meg DOM.

    and thats without ANY applications.

    and the target designer is nasty.

  49. identity. money. fun. media. by kipple · · Score: 1

    microsoft is embracing all of that (passport, atm, slot machines, msnbc).
    what's next? reproduction? sex? will we have microsoft powered condoms, that will look bigger but require a lot of resources? ...wow...

    --
    -- There are two kind of sysadmins: Paranoids and Losers. (adapted from D. Bach)
  50. Activation? by abumarie · · Score: 1
    I'm sorry, but you changed your configuration from 3 singles and a five to a ten. You must now call home before you may proceed...


    Seriously, in things like ATM machines, bloatware isn't a real issue any more. A 1.4 Ghz processor + mobo + 1 gb of ram is less than $300. Given that an ATM machine itself is a great many times that, such a cost would be below most radars. On the other hand, security, and reliability are central. I hope that whatever they learn in this area gets over to the regular os folks, but have my doubts.


    God help us though if they decide to do a joint marketing effort with X10. I'm sorry but you must read the following 5 spams, 10 popunders, 14 popovers & etc. before you can withdraw your money...

    --


    Sex is heriditary, if your parents didn't have it chances are good you won't either.
    1. Re:Activation? by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      The problem with the system requirements you list as being "below the radar" is the demands of the ATM environment.
      These machines need to be reliable under almost any concievable environmental circumstances.
      In the Phoenix, Arizona area, for instance, a stand-alone ATM in a small shed requires a LOT of cooling. These machines need to use the least amount of power possible to keep that cooling load, and electrical costs down.
      Should the cooling fail, the machine needs to be stable and shut down politely to avoid financial errors.
      Given the choice between a 1.4GHz Inel chip that diapates tremendous heat, or a 60Mhz PPC that dissaptes less than 20W, most any reasonable designer would choose the PPC (or other low power platform).

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    2. Re:Activation? by rnturn · · Score: 2
      ``A 1.4 Ghz processor + mobo + 1 gb of ram is less than $300. Given that an ATM machine itself is a great many times that, such a cost would be below most radars.''

      My experience with people who work in a manufacturing business (like building ATMs) is that management is a bit more sensitive to costs than, say, your typical pointy-haired IT manager. Waltzing into a meeting and stating that you think it's a good idea to increase costs by $300 and all you're going to get is a modest (and debatable) improvement in the user interface might require a lot of justification. ``Because it's from Microsoft'' might not be enough to convince the boss when he askes why you want to replace perfectly good, working code in the product line. Like someone mentioned in another post: A Z80 could do the things required in an ATM. And how much do those cost?

      Personally, it sickens me to see people's thinking limited to single turning of the gears and coming up with a solution without considering alternatives. Must be something they're putting in the cafeteria food in schools nowadays that is dulling their thought processes.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  51. And this is bad? by tachyonflow · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Honestly, I hope this isn't a complaint that Microsoft developers are interacting with users in newsgroups. This is a *good* thing. The article in Embedded Systems Programming was completely in a positive light. Microsoft has actually been much better at most companies at providing a forum for users to interact with each other and with Microsoft employees. This interaction can be a great boon! (Assuming developers know when to draw the line and not let it consume all their time.) This sounds exactly like what Christopher Locke, the author of
    • The Cluetrain Manifesto
    , advocates as being the next evolution of business. (I haven't actually read the book yet, but I listened to him speak in Boulder once, and his argument was extremely convincing.) This is my first time posting in slashdot, so forgive any stylistic errors. :)
    1. Re:And this is bad? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      No, the complaint is this. Microsoft pays lip service to so many virtues, yet somehow manages to exhibit none of them.

      Innovation? Well that means repackaging technology they bought somewhere else at firesale prices because the original owner couldn't compete. Increased customer value? Changing the terms of licensing, so that you need twice as many CAls as before. Or alternatively, discovering that while you could make a profit selling 98 at $50, $80 is the 'optimal' price. Security? That means 'Shhh, don't talk about it'.

      So...

      User interaction on newsgroups? Astro-turfing when someone asks about QNX or rtLinux. Trolling. Arguing that there is no bug, or if there is, it's actually a feature. Trying to change the subject. Overwhelming the moderators intentionally. If there are no moderators, ensuring that embedded XP posts outnumber other solutions 20 to 1. Excessive product announcements, in html format. That cause netscape to crash. Etc.

      If you can't see this happening, then you're not just optimistic, you're naive.

  52. So this means by Sukashi · · Score: 1

    News.com notes that this will be used in slot machines and ATMs If you hait a jackpot, the WinXP embedded machine sticks a vacuum hose into your pocket and sucks out all of your money.

  53. Never Get Embeddead With the Felonious KingDumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's right, we're on full boycott of the payper liesense 'products' of those racketeerious gangsters.

    DJIA here the one about linuxtoday getting phracked? Certainly not from them, you didn't.

    last few daze of our web address giveaway. Includes a year's free hosting, in case you knead somewhere to hang your hack, while the GNU millennium kicks in/.asp.

  54. Obligatory Joke by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny
    News.com notes that this will be used in slot machines and ATMs. Insert obligatory free-money joke.

    Free money, or FEE money?

    A Fee of $4.00 will be charged to this transaction for customer support, legal fees and continued lobbying to prevent Microsoft from being punished for monopolistic practices.

    PRESS THIS BUTTON TO ACCEPT ---->

    OR

    PRESS THIS BUTTON TO ACCEPT ---->

    Sorry, CANCEL has been disabled, please call 1-900-UGO-MSFT for customer support, first 30 minutes $75, mininum charge 30 minutes.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  55. Almost by CptnHarlock · · Score: 1

    It's an "Out of virtual memory" message. (In swedish) And I've seen quite a few of these. Also on the arrival/departure screens on Arlanda/Stockholm you see failiures quite often.

    --
    $HOME is where the .*shrc is
    -- silver_p
  56. ATM machines by pj7 · · Score: 1

    I once heard that OS/2 was a big thing for ATM machines. At that one of the reasons OS/2 will not go Open Source, at least for a while, has to do with that. Well, that and the fact that in Europe OS/2 is still used for controls of scientific machines and support contracts still hasn't run out.
    Can anyone verify this? I've done a little looking on the regular search engines and come up with nothing.

    1. Re:ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually, I have worked in the US ATM field for many years and can comment on that (for both NCR and Diebold - plus did consulting work for several of the larger banks). The vast majority of the old "green-screen" ATMs do run OS/2. However, like everything else times are changing. Like many of us that work in the technical aspect (programmer myself) it is more a aspect of finding hardware with device drivers for OS/2 - than a real want to switch the OS.

      That said. The new machines coming online with the bold colors, HTML interface code, and stuff are powered by WinNT - think COM+ and VBScript(through VB) with HTML screens. These require MPEG cards for videos and newer video cards for graphics that OS/2 has only spotty support. While some of the components (like the HDD, FDD, CDROM, etc are of the shelf components) - some like the encrypt, cage, and mobo are not, but all of these have been given thousands of hours of testing before they are officially "approved" as a box set. This left me in a funny situation on the West Coast last year of looking for a 2G Seagate IDE drive because that was the largest drive approved with the new hardware.

      Given that most of the new ATMs will be NT/2000-family powered it is a fairly easy assumption to forsee the eventual move to XP. However, given the length of time (and sheer number of ATMs that would need to be upgraded) that the industry moves I would not expect to see this anytime soon.

    2. Re:ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OS\2 is definatly used in ATMs. Talked to some guys that were installing one at the local colege. At the time they were debugging it befor they unleashed it on every one. The computer in there was a 386, or so I was told.

  57. Has Anybody Real Information To Share? by SloppyElvis · · Score: 1

    All I've seen is silly press releases and such. I noticed on the MS website, that there is a trial version of the EmbXP IDE. Has anyone experimented with this?

    Else, are there any MS employees or other folks who can point to some technical information, like memory req's.?

    We need info, not banter.

    To discourage is bad karma

  58. One of those bastards ate my plastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Natwest, Ecclesall road, sheffield.
    £30 please - chug chug - BSOD - 3 mins of BIOS crap - shredding sound - "press CTRL + ALT + DEL to log on" ... Thank you so very much Microsoft.

  59. Linux fanatics starve... by Zeinfeld · · Score: 5, Interesting
    ...refuse to accept money fro Windows XP based ATMs...

    The embedded devices market is not all about small and fast. And even where the issue is small and fast, the XP kernel may well prove to have more to offer than many UNIX designs.

    There is a wide range of embedded devices, from washing machines to cars, to industrial process machinery. Until recently only a small fraction of those systems had anything as sophisticated as an operating system.

    If on the other hand you want to build a next generation audio system you are likely to find that you need an O/S, you need some sort of file system to store your MP3s, you have an ethernet and possibly a WiFi interface to support, you may even support PCMCIA or compactflash. XP has major advantages in that space since you are guaranteed to have a driver available.

    The bloatware charge is and always has been bogus. People don't seem to understand that the value of a 3 year old PC is $150 and so there is no particular reason why Microsoft should limit a $100/$200 O/S so that it can run under the constraints of that machine. 512Mb SIMMs are on sale these days for the price of 16Mb SIMMs a couple of years back, nobody actually makes 20Gb 3.5" disks any more, they are too small to bother with.

    RAM and disk space are not constrained resources on the PC, so don't expect companies in that space to constrain them in their products. The O/S kernel is kept small because the performance of the machine depends on large parts of it being in primary or secondary cache most of the time.

    The features of XP that will be much more relevant to the embedded systems space are its multi-tasking and scheduling control. I don't expect any traditional UNIX kernel to do well there, the UNIX architecture was never designed for and is simply not up to RT tasks. Thats why the RT Linux varieties have major mods to the internals to support features such as guaranteed scheduling etc.

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    1. Re:Linux fanatics starve... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your comment has elicited another siezure.

      Dick Stallman is twitching now, like old Shakey (Janet Reno) herself.

      He's angry, fuming and the motor has been turned on in his Teletype ASR-33 terminal.

      As the smell of machine oil rises from the machine he sets about with an angry clatter typing his response:

      HOW DARE YOU TRY TO RENDER MY TERMNAL OBSOLETE. I WILL HAVE YOU KNOW THIS MACHINE IS PAID FOR AND IT DOES EVERYTHING ANYBODY NEEDS A COMPUTER FOR.

      Then he pulls off the strip of oiled paper tape, puts it into a carrier, and sticks it in the pneumatic tube for delivery to his assistant.

    2. Re:Linux fanatics starve... by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The bloatware charge is and always has been bogus. People don't seem to understand that the value of a 3 year old PC is $150 and so there is no particular reason why Microsoft should limit a $100/$200 O/S so that it can run under the constraints of that machine.

      Because people don't buy OLD computers to run new operating systems, they buy NEW ones. And NEW computers are not $150. So not only do you have to shell out another $200 for a bloated OS, you have to spend 2000 bucks for a system that'll run it.

      --
      "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
    3. Re:Linux fanatics starve... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > People don't seem to understand that the value
      > of a 3 year old PC is $150 and so there is no
      > particular reason why Microsoft should limit a
      > $100/$200 O/S so that it can run under the
      > constraints of that machine.

      The _reason_ that a 3 year old machine is not worth anything is that the newer MS software has bloated beyond its capability. This means that users need to replace machines every two or three years in order to 'keep up' when using MS systems.

      Yet the actual value of keeping up to the latest is negligible, there is no reduction in the time taken to write a memo, or construct a spreadsheet, these are limited by typing speed and brain speed. The only actual 'value' is the ability to use the latest MS proprietry file formats so that you can send these to associates and force them to buy new machines so they can be read.

      While this keeps Bill rich and has the support of the PC makers as it keeps them busy, it is very costly for all other businesses. The TCO is huge. In fact it is now like how mainframes were in 1980. It is time for a new simple system to come in beneath the hugely complex 'desktops', just as PCs crept in beneath the mainframes and departmental servers.

    4. Re:Linux fanatics starve... by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      Because people don't buy OLD computers to run new operating systems, they buy NEW ones. And NEW computers are not $150. So not only do you have to shell out another $200 for a bloated OS, you have to spend 2000 bucks for a system that'll run it.

      Last year you could get a new machine (sans monitor) for $450 at Micro Center. This year you can get name brand, 1.2 GHz plus machines for less than $1000. The system requirements for Windows XP are easily met by all the machines currently on the market. The only possible exception being some of the year old models being sold by the discount outlets.

      PCs are disposable equipment, they are not durable goods by any stretch of the imagination. Users want a fat O/S distribution.

      Even if you have an older PC you can now get 256Mb SIMMS for $30 and huge disks for $100. It is not at all unreasonable for XP to expect a high performance machine.

      Of course if your idea of computing is to use a Dec Vt100 attached to the serial port of your 386 box, then go ahead. Just don't expect the rest of us to adapt because you choose to use a museum piece.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    5. Re:Linux fanatics starve... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > XP has major advantages in that space since you are guaranteed to have a driver
      available.

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
      that's a good one.

      oh, you didn't mean a *working* driver......

    6. Re:Linux fanatics starve... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding?

      Maybe I should clue you in: not everyone _has_ $1000 and $200 a year to spend on a new computer and operating system. In fact, many of us are lucky to afford a roof over our heads.

      Ignoring the fact that it's completely wasteful financially to upgrade every year to stay ahead of the curve (same analogy applies to buying a new vehicle every year), the fact that you're encouraging bloated design is irritating as well.

      Say for instance that you have a set of programmers who write code that is only half as efficient as it could be. Now when you start the _design_ process targeting only half efficiency, the end result will be something that will only be 1/4 as efficient as it could have been.

      Okay, now I go buy a new PC that is 4 times as fast. Then what? Next year, the design bloat is again doubled, and the end result bloat is 4 times as bad again. But, I couldn't afford a new PC this year. Guess what? I don't use your software.

      The path of least resistance for designers and coders is bloat. It's the easy way out. You can argue for it all you want, but the end result stays the same, you'll lose users over it.

    7. Re:Linux fanatics starve... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By all means, feel free to run DOS applications on your XT or your Athlon. Nobody cares if you do. There's no doubt that you can be very productive and profitable with technology from the mid 1980s.

      Most of the supposed efficency from the computing industry is complete hogwash bullshit anyway. But it's your choice whether to buy into it or not.

      The point is that people want new software with new machines. Bloat sells. It's the same reason that new cars don't look like model Ts -- sex appeal sells, and selling keeps everyone in business.

    8. Re:Linux fanatics starve... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am running WinXP Home Edition on a Celeron500 with 128Mb of RAM.

      It is very clean, and as speedy as I could want.

    9. Re:Linux fanatics starve... by MrBoring · · Score: 1

      Why can't MS, and much of the rest of the programming community, stop slowing down their code so that programs always run as slow as they did, regardless of the speed of the machine. Is that too hard to ask? Stop making the poor, and apparently wiser, HW engineers work much harder to keep up with horrible, space/time unconserving practices.

    10. Re:Linux fanatics starve... by MrBoring · · Score: 1

      PCs are disposable equipment, they are not durable goods by any stretch of the imagination.

      Most businesses would rather minimize their expenses, especially IT, if they could. If I were the King of Gartner Research, I'd conduct a poll on how many business customers are irritated at the pace of upgrades. I bet quite a few.


      Most of todays upgrades don't buy much ROI, but are done to prevent further expenses later, such as lack of support. What would I, as an ordinary consumer get from spending the $30 for 256MB SIMMS, other than a receipt for the expenditure? Could I better analyze my finances? Could I play games that I couldn't before? Could I then run a big behemoth ERP system for my household? I just don't see the *PRACTICAL* gain from this. It may be faster, but I had to spend money to do that. Also, given todays programming, the speed with the new memory and new XP OS might be the same as the speed of a computer with lesser memory and an older OS.

      From an accounting standpoint, you're probably right. I'm sure computers go on the books as an immediate expense, instead of amortizing the cost over the life of the true useful life of the machine. That's because the industry has created a mindset of instantaneous obsolesence, for their own benefit--not consumers of any form. I would guess that to be the practical journal entry, but it may be different because of IRS depreciation rules.


      Users want a fat O/S distribution.

      Sure. More CD's to go through. More features, maybe. But how many would they not alreayd have? Also, if they knew the time it took to load the excessive bloat, would they still want it?
      Of course if your idea of computing is to use a Dec Vt100 attached to the serial port of your 386 box, then go ahead. Just don't expect the rest of us to adapt because you choose to use a museum piece.

      If I were playing games, or surfing the web, I'd need the absolute fastest largest machine. But if I wanted to get work done, the vt100/386 combo might be faster, because the programmer couldn't bog it down with worthless graphical, web, javascript bloat. *Note* The previous was an exageration.
    11. Re:Linux fanatics starve... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2
      Speaking of people running new software on old computers. I just got a brand new computer from the garbage in Broadway&Wall street here in New York City. It only needed a new cdrom drive which I fortunately had a spare. I actually did purchase a new OS for it (progeny Debian). People in Wall Street are so stupid. They upgrade there systems for no reason at all. Consumers are waking up to the fact that they do not need hardware upgrades. Also Kids today seriously underestimate the power of older machines like my brand new pentium90. Courtesy of some wall street firm. :-). With the right network connection, I can have a serious webserver with it. You do not need state of the art equipment unless you expect lots and I mean lots of hits. Slashdot is one of the busiest servers on the web so it does not represent the needs of the average web server.

      I think Microsoft as well as OEM's are in trouble because of this.

  60. Lies, damn lies! by CaptainZapp · · Score: 3, Funny
    The accusation of astroturfing is just untrue, those are lies and FUD spread by /.

    In fact, embedded XP is the best thing since sliced bread and the Stinger platform will rarely crash your phone. The XBox kicks ass and Steve "Fester" Balmer is the nicest guy you can imagine.

    In essence, it's really not true that Microsoft employees subvert discussion groups. I can prove it if you send mail to captainzapp@microsoft.com.

    --
    ich bin der musikant

    mit taschenrechner in der hand

    kraftwerk

  61. Awwww =) by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    A kinder, gentler overbearing corporate monopoly. How refreshing.

  62. No... by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    Embedded could be thought of as 'a computer inside something that's not a computer'.

    The computer that handles the engine in modern cars, for instance.

    Embedded does not mean 'small and fast'.

    Where on earth did you get the '60% of all embedded systems are DOS and the Linux??

    Most embedded systems are QNX, VXWorks, and other, traditional real-time operating systems, or hand-written from scratch.

    RTLinux is a relative newcomer.

    Or do you think 'embedded' means 'small PC' or 'handheld pc'? It doesn't.

  63. No, not really.. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    Because embedded XP probably has nothing to do with the user-interface features of Windows XP.

    Embedded operating systems provide a framework for custom applications to run.

    And before you 'trust' them more than you do MS, do you even know who they are? Bold statement.

    Embedded systems in ATM's are rigorously programmed applications. THe fact that they move to a different OS is no big deal.

  64. Embedded XP... by Glock27 · · Score: 2
    is best embedded in a block of concrete and dumped in the ocean.

    You'll note that it is touted for use in "ATMs and slot machines". That is because it cannot be used for hard realtime, low latency applications like flight controls, robotics, or medical devices. It is also sure to be bloated and inefficient compared with something that is designed from the ground up to be an embedded OS.

    I'd highly recommend QNX instead, it is POSIX and QNX sits on the realtime Linux committee. Hard Hat Linux and cousins are looking better and better as well. These solutions do support hard realtime scheduling, thus providing across the board solutions for all your embedded needs. QNX, in particular, is also very well engineered. It provides a highly modular architecture, allowing you to deploy only the functionality you need, minimizing system cost.

    299,792,458 m/s...not just a good idea, its the law!

    --
    Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
    Score: -1 100% Flamebait
    1. Re:Embedded XP... by rnturn · · Score: 2
      ``...embedded in a block of concrete and dumped in the ocean.''

      I like that one. I was going to suggest a place where one could embed WinXP but it'd get someone an assault conviction. Or worse.

      ``...touted for use in "ATMs and slot machines". That is because it cannot be used for hard realtime, low latency applications...''

      Hmm... I'm having difficulty seeing what the need for any sort of realtime OS would be for an ATM or slot machine. (Probably because I'm more used to real realtime systems like navigation and landing systems.) Heck, MVS or VMS could be considered realtime enough for ATMs and slot machines. Personally, I suspect MS is recommending WinXP for those applications because they see that equipment being used in industries they think have lots of money laying around that can be spent on MS products or royalties. Maybe I'm just jaded... Nah!

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    2. Re:Embedded XP... by Glock27 · · Score: 2
      Hmm... I'm having difficulty seeing what the need for any sort of realtime OS would be for an ATM or slot machine. (Probably because I'm more used to real realtime systems like navigation and landing systems.)

      That was exactly my point - why use an OS that's restricted to only the 'easy' embedded projects? You're much better off gaining expertise with something that'll address the entire gamut of systems.

      Sorry if I wasn't clear.

      299,792,458 m/s...not just a good idea, its the law!

      --
      Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
      Score: -1 100% Flamebait
  65. What pisses me off... by gadders · · Score: 1

    ..is how they took the name of a fabulous whisky and applied it to their shite system.

    Also, some cashpoints in the UK run some version of NT now and I saw one at Charing Cross station with a fatal error dialog box on the screen.

  66. To be fair by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1

    To be fair, if I were an MS employee, I would be interested in letting people know about Embedded XP's key features like Windows File Protection and Windows Driver Protection. Currently I run Mac OS X, so I am already protected against Windows Drivers, but boy, what I wouldn't give to be protected from Windows Files!

    --
    Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
  67. You probably don't believe this but... by flegged · · Score: 1

    ...the Lloyds ATM in Cluny Square, Buckie, runs DOS. It crashed once when my brother was using it, and ate his card.

    Scary? How many other ATMs around the world run DOS?

    --

    "I think he was truly surprised at how little I cared about how big a market the Mac had" - Linus on Jobs
  68. Ahhhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... The age-old question... What crashed first? The O/S or the economy?

    ~m

  69. Doesn't matter by G00F · · Score: 1

    It would be very hard for a company to be less trustworthy than MS. And I'm not kidding either.

    --
    The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive
    1. Re:Doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Battlefield Airborne Instrumentation System,
      Battlefield Automation Interoperability System, or Blind Adaptive Interference Suppression.

      Unless it's a misspelling of bias.

    2. Re:Doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All his "bais" are belong to you

  70. MS shill, evil wishing others to starve! shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mean and evil, that's what you are.
    REPENT SINNER.

    The real truth: embedded is simple and stupid and for a single purpose. One doesn't even need an operating system provided one know how to set up the processor registers in Assembler or C code.

    Microslut is SOO evil and pathetic. What you wish on us will happen to you.

    All of your bad Karma is belonging to YOU.

  71. because by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the CD is "bloated" if you can call it that. If you try the disk you'll pee your pants... :)

  72. Obligitory post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine a Beowulf Clus .. *OUCH*!

  73. Windows in a slot machine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can see it now...

    Bar....BAR......Blue Screen?

  74. xp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does this mean that banks will have to reboot their atm machines..?

  75. Re: by mrcparker · · Score: 1

    How does bloated code define stability? Unless there is more robust error checking, bloated code tends to make a system less stable.

  76. WinXP for ATM by TheCrunch · · Score: 5, Funny

    Welcome to WinXP for ATM
    Please wait.
    Enter your card.
    New hardware found! Installing card-reader, please wait.
    Please remove card from ATM.
    Rebooting...
    Welcome to WinXP for ATM
    Please wait.
    GPF, press "1, Clear + Enter" to reboot.
    Rebooting...
    Welcome to WinXP for ATM
    Please wait.
    Scandisk found errors on card-reader.
    Enter your card.
    Errors on your card have been found. Would you like to create a recovery-card?
    "No."
    It looks like you have never used this ATM before, would you like to transfer your profile?
    "How do you know that?? No!"
    You have selected withdraw cash.
    Access Denied. Only a user with administrative rights may perform this action.
    "F***.. Gimme back my card!"
    Unable to remove card, there has been a sharing violation. This card is in use by another user.
    "WTF????"

    --
    My life is one big siesta in which I'm dreaming I wished my life was one big siesta.
    1. Re:WinXP for ATM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol..lol To freekin' funny.

      Linux=OpenSource=Freedom

  77. In Portugal... by sh4na · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    there is one ATM network for all banks, managed by an independent group. They are all in color, and some talk and everything. They all used to run OS/2, and there was never a problem, but now they've switched to NT.

    Boy, you wouldn't believe the things I've seen popping up on the screen. Everything from "driver failed to load" from "multimedia is on, press ok to continue"! hehehehehe! (how do you press ok on an ATM?)

    Oh, and, of course, blue-screens galore!

    Next thing you know, the money comes out before you even put in the card...

    --
    shana
    ......gone crazy, back soon, leave message
  78. AHA!!! by CptnHarlock · · Score: 1

    So you are the one responsible for this!!

    Hey guys! Lets /. him!!

    For great justice!!

    Err.. Now I need some sleep... :-P

    --
    $HOME is where the .*shrc is
    -- silver_p
  79. 60% DOS.... my arse by MosesJones · · Score: 4, Insightful


    What embedded systems do you work on ? Most embedded systems (controllers, switches etc etc) run a very very small RTOS, DOS is not an RTOS (Real Time Operating System).

    DOS is not an RTOS, Linux is not an RTOS. These systems are not really talking about embedded stuff at all, they are talking about small PC architectures, which have their place. But embedded is about small footprint and 100% reliability. I wouldn't like to know that the medical controller my life relied upon was using DOS.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:60% DOS.... my arse by DA_MAN_DA_MYTH · · Score: 1

      Linux is not an RTOS

      Yeah, but can it be? I remember reading something about a year ago, Lineo creating a a Linux based RTOS. (small footprint)

      --
      "It takes many nails to build a crib, but one screw to fill it."
    2. Re:60% DOS.... my arse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HURD it ... shake realtime ... its a real fine micro kernel

  80. Re:Screw XP by punkball · · Score: 1

    Maybe microsoft should stop paying employees to write good things about microsoft and start writing good code instead!

  81. buy why? by abes · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Okay, I can see why misguided developers might want to place XP in hand helds like palm, but I can't imagine what you gain from placing it in a _completely_ non-windowing system. As a previous poster pointed out, (a) you can get BSOD, and (b) I wonder how you click 'OK' on that dialog box.

    The display you see for example on ATMs I suspect is just as easy to draw regardless of the OS you use. You're writing embedded systems, which means you are likely to write your own drivers anyways. If you are going to run XP, you certainly have the space/power to run a library like SDL which can do everything XP can do graphically AND remain much less dependent on your platform.

    I am not trying to bash windows (okay, I am kinda), but just point out that an OS used primarily as a windowing system, may not be the best pick for a non-windowing system. Its like having windows on PDAs. The screens are barely big enough to show just one window, why would someone want overlapping windows?

  82. Less opinions more facts please by succotash · · Score: 1

    Are there any companies out there building embedded linux stuff for ATM's and slot machines to challenge MS in this market space? I've read lots of comments here about geeks who looked at devices and said, "wouldn't it be neat if that was embedded linux?" But I'm tired of those posts. Your ideas are grand, now go start a company!

    MS is making a move into the ATM and slot machine market, who is going to stop them with an embedded linux solution for this space? I'd love to read about it here on this NEWS site.

  83. Employee propoganda ??? by jeff13 · · Score: 1

    Let me get this straight: M$ has ordered their employees to promote M$ products online. Does anyone remember when having a job meant you were still considered a human being with individuality and human rights?

    If my employer asked me to promote the corporation, or even asked me to keep my opinions about the evil practices of my company to myself (not now, my current company is quite nice)... I wouldn't. 'Course, Bill Gates would fire me. I wonder how many of you IT geeks would too.

    I have no problem giving out my opinion about M$, East Link Systems, @Home, and the rest of the .COM barbarians. Corporate IT culture in general is a vacuous hell made up of the dumbest people I've ever met. Greed is the great God of geek culture. Money is the first force in the lives of most of the people who read this. They are willing (very willing) to give up their human rights, or at least keep quiet, for an IT position and $28K a year. Pretty cheap, but it's the truth. The combination of young, naive workers with high technical skills and a corporate money machine (that has never been so powerful in the history of the Industrial Age) has created culture so empty and ugly I can't but look back at my IT career in disgust. What have I accomplished? A few bad M$ networks and Gigs of useless technical docs. What's the point? Oh yea, some suit throws $$$ at me every two weeks. I contributed nothing to my community and in fact, I've stolen and lied to my customers... mainly because I knew that M$ server software was crap... "Oh yea, it's Microsoft so it's the best...". But I knew better. Not only that, I was well aware that I could have set my customers up at a fraction of the price with a Unix solution.

    It's not that I feel like I'm stealing... it's that M$ is stealing from me. It's just that I'm passing on the theft to the customer. It's called progress I think.

    It's like a Phillip K. Dick novel! The corps are legally considered individuals themselves, giving them unprecedented power over the individual, not to mention their all powerful political lobbies. How is the individual worker supposed to maintain their positions, prestige, and career path when they can be downsized, fired, "let go", or even arrested at the whim of their greedy bitter managers? And managers are all bitter and mean, aren't they? They have something to protect - from you! But I digress...

    I'd like to say the future looks bleak... but this is the future and it's all come true. Sorry Phillip K. - the plastic has yet to melt.

    1. Re:Employee propoganda ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're really weird.

      Do your synapses always run so unevenly?

      Do something about your anger.

    2. Re:Employee propoganda ??? by jeff13 · · Score: 1


      Why thank you.

      Yes, indeed they do.

      Piss off jerk!

  84. Embedded XP, an Oxymoron by jageryager · · Score: 1

    Main Entry: oxymoron
    Pronunciation: "äk-si-'mOr-"än, -'mor-
    Function: noun
    Inflected Form(s): plural oxymora /-'mOr-&, -'mor-/
    Etymology: Late Greek oxymOron, from neuter of oxymOros pointedly
    foolish, from Greek oxys sharp, keen + mOros foolish
    Date: 1657

    : a combination of contradictory or incongruous words (as cruel kindness)

    --
    "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety"-B.Franklin
  85. Re:Screw XP by madenosine · · Score: 1

    There have been numerous posts like this, and the answer is simple: Honestly, for most people, learning another operating system is not worth the time or effort. Now more than ever, as Windows systems are starting to crash less. For most people, it is not worth the time or trouble; it is obvious.

  86. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  87. Re:Screw XP by ethereal · · Score: 1

    That is a reasonable perspective if you are talking about desktop PC OS usage at home. Most people don't want to mess around with their desktop PC at home; they want to use it to actually do things, and then once they're done they want to quit dealing with the computer and go back to watching TV or whatever else it is that they do. I don't have any problem with this, although I'm not really one of those people.

    But when it comes to the selection of computing equipment, OSes, and software for a business environment or to be used as part of an embedded system which has certain requirements, it's ridiculous for a developer to say that they are not willing to learn how to create the best system/device possible. The whole point of being in IT, engineering, or development is to create the solution that meets your requirements in the best way, not just to stick with what you know and trust a vendor (and a particularly disreputable one at that) that their product will do the job. "I'm just too lazy to learn about alternatives" is an acceptable excuse for a home user, but it is professional incompetence in a business setting. You don't see accountants who fail to learn the new accounting rules because they can't be bothered to, do you? Or rather, you don't see those accountants employed for very long.

    --

    Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  88. /. vs xp by madenosine · · Score: 1

    There have been numerous posts saying "why would anybody use xp embedded, let alone xp" , and the answer is simple:

    Obviously, most people are most familiar with the windows os/gui. Honestly, for most people, learning another operating system is not worth the time or effort. When they are going to get a device with an embedded OS, they see that they can get one with a familiar interface (yes, microsoft's embedded OSes have a similar interface) or something with a completely new interface? Now more than ever, as Windows systems are starting to crash less. For most people, it is not worth the time or trouble. It's obvious!

    1. Re:/. vs xp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      id mod this up if i could, cause these slashdot people are GNU hugging single minded hippies.. notice the slant's on the windows stories

  89. Do i hafta use Passport instead of my ATM card? by josquint · · Score: 2, Funny

    heh.. and does MSN Messenger insessantly load on all the machines. That'd b great, i can check my hotmail while waiting 5 min for my transaction to complete.

    Better yet, maybe they leave the remote adminstration enabled by default :->

  90. Lucent/Avaya phone switches by eufaula · · Score: 1

    the head of our IT dept. came back from a conference where it was announced that embedded NT/XP would be the new OS on these switches over the UNIX-based OS that has been running them for the last 10-15 years. What were they thinking? why touch anything that is that important? Imagine a company with 1000 employees in a call center and NT decides to barf a lung during the hour when the phone traffic coming in is the busiest....think they will buy another switch from Lucent? an ATM or a Kiosk is hardly mission critical. but a phone switch? where is MS and their "Mythical 5 9's" ad now.

  91. nobody's puttin WinXP in MY bed... by josquint · · Score: 1

    ick ick ick..
    er.. heh

  92. Three Blue Screens in a row? by djKing · · Score: 2

    "News.com notes that this will be used in slot machines and ATMs. Insert obligatory free-money joke."

    see subject line.

    --
    Free as in "the Truth shall set you..."
  93. Developer friendliness by ucblockhead · · Score: 2
    What is really frightening is that Microsoft is actually one of the more developer-friendly of closed-source companies.

    But speaking as someone who has used Microsoft development products for over a decade now, the trouble has always been that the information flow was one-way. They provide you with reams of information, but when you report a problem (and in one case, I was even able to give them a source line and fix for a bug in the ATL), it usually goes into a black hole. I still remember how shocked I was the first time this happened to me. I was used to the way Borland actually let you talk to an engineer and gave you an answer in a timely fashion, even if it was "well, we'll fix it in the next release".

    And while I am talking about failings of Microsoft's developer support, I'll mention the other big one: They have a tendency to focus too much on the technology du jour and not enough on older stuff. You find lots of stupidities like sample code that no longer works (just ran into this the other day with the "SAMPLE.DSM" macros that come with Visual Studio). The people at Microsoft need to understand that developers can't just instantly jump to whatever new technology is out there even if it is superior. When you've got a million lines of code that use DDE, the answer "Use COM" is not sufficient.

    --
    The cake is a pie
  94. Anyone remember Embedded NT? by Ivan+Raikov · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So is this like the embedded Windows NT from about four years ago, which required 48MB(!) of ROM or disk space, and an x86 processor? I don't know how anyone could think of embedded devices with such a monster running on them.

  95. michael is a wanker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, you are michael. Please stop your inane commentary.

  96. Communication good, now do it full scale by SilentChris · · Score: 2
    "To his chagrin, Morris learned that the debate, and the debater, simply wouldn't go away. Each day when Morris returned to the same news group, his adversary was there, armed with more ammunition. The two continued their exchange for more than a week, in full view of other Talisker beta customers who felt free to chime in about who was right.


    "It can be a bit of an ego blow sometimes," Morris recalled. "But it comes down to this: We're trying to sell our product to these people, and sometimes they give us very valuable feedback."


    Indeed, Morris said that Microsoft incorporated that customer's feedback in its second beta edition of Talisker, which will ultimately be called Windows CE.Net when it debuts as a full-fledged product later this year.
    "

    That's good. Communication is always good, whether the product is open or not.

    Now do it with all of your products (including Windows XP) and I will might consider go back to Windows full-time. And stop hiding features in the registry! You listening Microsoft!?!

  97. Oh! by Docrates · · Score: 2

    Now we know how little John Connor did it!

    --

    There are two kinds of people in the world: Those with good memory.
  98. Embedded or built-in?? by gerardrj · · Score: 2, Informative

    Microsoft seems re-defining the term "embeded". In my experience, embeded means a device who's OS is completly invisible to the end users.
    To me a sales/Internet kiosk is not embedded, a PDA is not embedded. Embedded systems are not necessarily small, but the user is not required to know abut the system at all. For instance, a telephone switches, PVR, heart-rate monitor, automotive control.

    These devices run with minimal system resoures for years on end without errors, reboots or upgrades. Frequently, the OS is coded in ROM. T
    I used to use an OS called OS/9 from Microware on my 6809 based Tandy Color Computer. This OS ran in 64K (not Meg) or RAM and a single 360KB floppy drive. It's a real time, protected memory, secure operating system. OS/9 runs on quite a few low-wattage CPUs with significant processing power. While not free, it is a mature, reliable OS. And I mean OS, not kernel.

    Probably everone in the United States interacts with and OS/9 embedded system on a regular basis, but they'll never know it.

    MS on the other hand is providing an OS that will still run on a high power consumption system with tremendous resources that is built in to, or controls some other device or structure. In most of the applications this "embeded XP" would target, the OS would be the front end that interacts with the end user.

    --
    Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  99. Truth in advertising, perhaps by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 2, Funny

    XP should be imbedded in those machines you usually find in train stations that will weigh you and tell your fortune.

    That way, Microsoft can honestly say XP "scales".

    {mmph, snort, BWAAAHAHAHAHA}

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  100. Huh? by jargoone · · Score: 1

    News.com notes that this will be used in slot machines and ATMs. Insert obligatory free-money joke.

    Is that free-as-in-beer money or free-as-in-speech money?

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's 'shut up and drink the beer you paid for' time.

  101. Slashdotters are a bunch of idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love how you all start bashing embeded XP when not a single one of you has any experience whatsoever with it. It makes you sound really intellegent. For the vast majority out there who appears to be ignorant fanatics, the sentence before this was sarcasm.

  102. For some, it is too late... by Dog+and+Pony · · Score: 4, Informative

    In Sweden, some ATMs are already running NT.

    And yes, they did *actually* get those "Low on Virtual Memory" errors (try to hit CTRL-ALT-DELETE to reboot on an ATM) and even a few bluescreens back then. I kid you not.

    On the other hand after those child diseases, they are actully seeming to behave, and I know of noone that has actually lost (or gotten) money due to this.

    The banks just needed two service packs, is my guess. :)

    Well, so this product, after troubles unheard of in other systems, finally made it "stable" and "reliable".

    I would not like to bet my money once again, just because I got the winning ticket once. Would you?

  103. MS tax on a new level? by Hooya · · Score: 1

    great. now i'm going to be required to pay *direct visible* taxes to MS

  104. Oh how the tables will turn by levin · · Score: 1

    Now it will be easy to get money from a slot machine and hard to get money from an ATM.

    --Luke Crowthers

    --

    `which fortune`
  105. Like cash registers? Ha... by cirby · · Score: 1

    The Albertson's grocery stores here changed over to an NT-based system this year. A couple of weeks ago, the computer decided that the stores weren't making ebough money. So it took the ATM charges people made at the registers and ran them through five to eight more times each...

  106. Re:WHERE DO WE PUT PICTURES? by NigelJohnstone · · Score: 1

    Is there any place we can contribute the pictures. I have a few I've photographed of Windows devices doing what Windows does best.

  107. Anyone remember Steve Barkto? by dgenr8 · · Score: 1

    Microsoft commonly smurfs newsgroups and other public forums (letters to the editor, etc.) The more influential they perceive the forum to be, the more effort they put into it. Yes, this includes /.

    Back on the old Canopus forum on Compuserve, there was a character named Arnold who wrote countless pro-Microsoft messages in the days of the war with OS/2. I'm talking about 1992-1995 when the need for PR was very great -- Microsoft had to convince people that they didn't need a 32-bit pre-emptive multitasking OS.

    Arnold was incredibly prolific. He'd respond to your arguments in the space of a few minutes, and his response would demonstrate incredibly detailed understanding of the topic, both broad and deep. There were rumors that he was Bill Gates. But I' pretty sure the truth is that he was the external interface to a complex system that linked together many, many Microsoft and PR people in a sophisticated effort to influence the opinion of the high-level IT executives and writers who frequented the forum.

    The reason I believe this is that Arnold himself suggested it to me.

    Then there was Steve Barkto, a pro-Microsoft poster whose account, it turned out, had been paid for with a Microsoft credit card. That was probably the last time they did that.

  108. I thought XP was already a slot machine by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2
    ...this will be used in slot machines

    How many times do you pull the handle before the BSoD signifies your Jackpot?

    P.S. Simple way to BSoD XP -- Use the disk manager to create and format a new drive. While drive is formatting, attempt to open an Explorer window on the drive. Kaboom!

    --
    That is all.
    1. Re:I thought XP was already a slot machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple way to completely disable a Linux Box:

      Pull the power cord while the machine is loading a complicated web page in Netscape.

      This works best on machines using the traditional 'shit' ext2fs filesystem. There are rumors that there will be improved default filesystems on many distributions before too much longer.

      Do it to your bosses laptop if he lets that annoying Linux fantatic in IT convince him to 'give Linux a try for a week.' There's no way in HELL Linux will be rolled out then.

  109. Why? by jrockway · · Score: 1

    What the hell do you need XP in a friggin' ATM for? Here's what the ATM does -- it asks you for 4 digits, an account (1-4), and a dollar ammount, 5 digits usually. We need a consumer desktop GUI in order to type in 10 digits?

    --
    My other car is first.
  110. Windows Slots? by Hellvetica · · Score: 1

    Bar... Bar... BSOD?!?

  111. Of eXP and slot machines and free money. by Xunker · · Score: 2

    Okay, I can fully see why they're doing this: Slot machines are getting more and more advanced these days to bring in more consumers who aren't traditionally attracted to the "one armed bandit". So they make them more advanced with sound, video and everything else you can name. This is fine with me since I don't gamble.

    But, to be fair, the Windows product line has been rightly derided for it's stability (though, IMO, Xfree is even less stable :) ) and there is the problem. Most multi-media slaot machines run on proven embedded OS's (especially QNX) and a pretty much bullet-proof becuase they are so single-focused.

    I'm not sure of the size of Embedded XP, but I have feeling it will be like embedded NT and have loads of cruft that you'll never need in an embedded system -- and that just gives more stuff to go wrong.

    An issue arises: GO to Las Vegas and look at the legal notices posted around, usually around the change cage -- one of them will be a big sign saying something like "in the case of mechanical or elelctronic failure or error, all payouts are declared void and all wagers are considered forfeit." What this is saying is that if your eXP multimedia slot machine BSODs and spits out 50k dollars at you, you don't get to keep it -- what's more is that any money you put into the machine as a bet is lost.

    Casino aren't in this business to loose money.

    --
    Hilary Rosen's speech was about her love of money and her desire to roll around naked in a pile of money.
  112. Re:Linux fanatics starve.(Mickysoft's turn blue) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is exactly what makes Windows FLAKY.
    Want lots of BSOD? Then do lots of multitasking,
    better yet do lots of multitasking at the Kernel/
    Driver level. Get your drivers from those nice
    Companies that don't give a crap if your
    machine has a race condition on day 13 and blue
    screens. And when it does, give them a call and
    see if they will fix it.

    Its really a bummer to get stuck with
    a proprietary system/code that is flaky,
    and you are at the whims of the Company
    that produces it.

    "Hi, I've been working
    on this new cash machine for the last year,
    we finally got it out in the field and now
    it crashes every so often". I think its
    crashing in the "smart card" driver, but I'm
    not sure because I don't have the source code
    to it, or the operating system that surrounds
    it, so I can't debug it - Actually I could, but
    it takes damn near forever to debug something
    when you have to do it with dissassembly listings."

    Hmmmm, I wonder if that "smart-card" driver and
    library is really secure? The Company that made
    it told me not to worry, so it must be OK.
    Sure would be nice if I could look at the code
    to see if it used ROT13.

    Hmmmm, wonder if there are any bad bits in
    that 512M DIMM module we are buying. I know,
    I'll just assume that there aren't, and if
    it blue screens, I'll blame it on Microsoft.
    I mean, hey, that integrated motherboard is
    good enough for joe blow six pack, I think
    I'll put it in a Best Buy POS. Why? Because
    Microsoft says I can, XP is for embedded now.
    (Thats sarcasm...)

  113. Stability by cadfael · · Score: 1
    Watchdog timers: Watchdog timers provide a way to create very reliable systems by always guaranteeing that the system is in a known state. When a watchdog timer is used, Windows software must regularly notify the watchdog timer that it is functioning correctly. If for any reason the Windows software fails to notify the watchdog timer within a preprogrammed period of time, the system is assumed to be in a frozen or unusual state. When this happens, the watchdog hardware typically resets the system. This allows the system to autonomously recover from an unusual state. Several third-party vendors offer watchdog timer hardware and corresponding device driver support


    So, they are assuming that the system will encounter problems (wise, since most embedded systems will eventually run into a case the developer did not plan for). I actually bothered looking at the overview, and for the market I work in (really embedded systems) WindowsXP embedded is way overkill. Middleware is now being standardized on Java (sorry, can't find the link right now). So, I am thinking that large scale systems (like ATM's and public displays, etc) are their target.
    --
    -- The Hollow Man
    Non illegitimati carborundum
  114. Re:Screw XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux is a hobby OS championed by computing enthusiasts.

    Reference 'Amiga' for historical background.

  115. Settlements and ATMs by Elmar_Stoned_at_Work · · Score: 1

    Hey, does this mean that microsoft can settle their lawsuits by handing out atm cards to plaintiffs with a $ limit on them? :P

    --
    -elmar-
  116. ATM money spill joke? Oh No, Not funny at all.. by Teukels · · Score: 1

    >News.com notes that this will be used in slot >machines and ATMs. Insert obligatory free-money >joke.

    Well, I don't think it is funny at all. I've seen Windows NT SP-6 crash an ATM about one and a half month ago..

    It had allready absorbed my card and it bloody bluescreened, after a while, it decided to reboot. I was happy to see it was a standard procedure of the machine to spit out an inserted card after reboot..

    About two weeks ago, the 'same', thing happened but than with a missing DLL or something. Anyway, it had eaten my card and d*mnit, again it choose to not continue it service but show me a dialog screen on which I was supposed to click 'OK' ..

    After a while I returned to the machine and it had blanked. A few hours later, (I had my card blocked), they found my card and I could unlock my card again.

    I sincerely hope the dutch banks (these were two different banks at which this happened) switch to Linux ASAP. (Please note and Mind you; they do not want you at the counter no more!)

    If they'll start applying XP on these, I'll be returning to the sock under my pillow.

    tssk.

  117. Windows XP Embedded - Inconceivable by kevin_butler · · Score: 3, Funny
    You keep saying that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

    System requirements

  118. Monolith vs Components by timdaly · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was under the (obviously wrong) impression that XP was a single pile that had to include IE. At least that is what the court testimony said. (I know it isn't true). Now we are told that one can build XP from small components. So why can't we unbundle XP and IE (and WMP, etc)? Can I get the parts and build an acceptable alternative pile? Can we get the court to require that XP be shipped as components?

    1. Re:Monolith vs Components by JMZero · · Score: 1

      I think vendors should be able to ship whatever they want pre-installed with the machines - but they need to include all the components on CD (including IE, I'd say).

      They also should have some sort of browser pre-installed, I'd think - one that uninstalls cleanly I'd hope. They should have another package where they install everything.

      MS seems way to keen on forcing installs. I think IE is ready to stand on its own legs.

      --
      Let's not stir that bag of worms...
  119. Re: "guaranteed to have a driver available" by Jens · · Score: 2
    "you may even support PCMCIA or compactflash. XP has major advantages in that space since you are guaranteed to have a driver available. "

    Yeah, right. Who guarantees this? I want it in writing.
    And then I want a driver for my PCMCIA network card which is neither supported with Windows 98, nor with 2000, nor with XP. It is, though, under Linux.

    When did Microsoft ever guarantee anything? They say in their own EULA that their OS is unfit for 'mission critical' applications, and with the last couple months, most e-mail users and web server admins knew what itreally meant not to be able to properly fix your machine, no matter how much support contracts you had.

    "People don't seem to understand that the value of a 3 year old PC is $150 and so there is no particular reason why Microsoft should limit a $100/$200 O/S so that it can run under the constraints of that machine."

    no, You don't understand. People don't understand why they should buy a machine whose cost is 50% the software it runs. They don't understand why (to take your example) a simple MP3 player would need hundreds of MB of of hard disk just to drive an operating system, and the manufacturer wouldn't understand why they wouldn't be able to modify the OS to their own taste, but have to rely on the company to provide what is supposedly best for them.
    And I personally don't believe that anybody can strip down XP to a level that makes it run satisfactorily on a 386 class CPU from a 4MB flash ROM that needs close to no electrical power, when the application this system is supposed to run doesn't need Gigahertz and Gigabytes.

    "I don't expect any traditional UNIX kernel to do well there, the UNIX architecture was never designed for and is simply not up to RT tasks. Thats why the RT Linux varieties have major mods to the internals to support features such as guaranteed scheduling etc."

    Windows "wasn't originally designed to be" multi-tasking, multi-user, not to mention even being network capable, either. And I don't think you have actually seen RTLinux yet - or MS have achieved something MUCH better than their various embedded forks of Windows since I last checked.

    My point is that RTLinux is making headway fast, and I don't hear much about Windows in the embedded market. And for this, there must be a reason.

  120. What this REALLY is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    OK - 3 points:

    1. DOS, pSOS, & VxWorks *dominate* the embedded scene right now, not Linux and not CE. (although there are good movements by other "alternatives" to the big-license - things like Nucleus)

    2. The REAL name of "XP Embedded" should be "XP Modular" since thats really what it is and what its intended to be. You can think of XP Embedded (and the NT Embedded that preceded it) as an alternative way to install plain-ol XP. Its "Platform Builder" allows you to choose all the various modules and parts of normal XP and create a custom image and boot for the system - nothing else. (although thats still a useful thing, but it'd certainly be nice if this was something that came along with XP as it is now rather than a "different" product)

    3. In "some" ways, you can/could think of the XBox as "Windows 2000 Embedded" even tho such a product never existed.

  121. So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you change more than 6 resistors on your ebedded solutions does XP deactivate itself and require you to re-register?

    Suck for pace makers.

  122. XP Embeded != CE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Embedded.com talks about CE and the article at microsoft.com talks about Windows XP - "Built upon the proven code base of Windows® 2000, Windows XP Embedded delivers....". The slashdot article seems to talk about them both. Be aware of the difference!

  123. Duh! by cavemanf16 · · Score: 2
    Look, I'm no genius, but I do pay attention in classes at college these days. The first chapter of my Digital Circuits book gave the definitions of a microprocessor versus a microcontroller. Embedded devices, even "really big ones" like ATM's, don't need lots of fluff. They do one thing, and one thing only, and they HAVE to do it perfectly 99.99% of the time.

    So how is WinXP, THE biggest bloatware out there in terms of an OS (who needs all the media crap they stuffed in it when I've got all the media programs I could ever want for free on the 'net?), going to even come close to competing in an 'embedded' market place? It is THE quintessential definition of a "microprocessor of OS's" versus something like PalmOS, which I would consider much more of a "microcontroller of OS's." Microsoft is making some stupid moves, and their shareholders had better realize that MS has a good (albeit, evil) business model for making money, but they're just not going to rake in the dough with this 'latest, greatest' XP system like they hope to. It's not new or revolutionary, just shitload's worth of bug fixes to what people wanted out of Win95 originally. And I, like most people who want to be on the cutting edge of technology, am not seeing a need, or even a want, to make the upgrade to WinXP for a long time.

  124. Dreamcast/Windows CE FUD by Gizzmonic · · Score: 2, Informative
    Seriously, though, Windows works a lot better for embedded than people think. Remember Dreamcast?

    Hopefully for the last time: 95% of Dreamcast games do not run WinCE/DirectX. The operating system the Dreamcast uses resides on the disc, not the system ROM, and is up to the developer what OS and API to use.

    Most Dreamcast games used "SegaKatana," which was Sega's own API/OS for games. It was lean, mean, and very stable.

    Since the Dreamcast uses a Hitachi SH4 processor (same family as PocketPCs), Windows CE compatibility was implemented to encourage PC ports. Most WinCE games (Worms World Party, Hidden and Dangerous, etc) are notoriously buggy and ugly compared to Katana games. This is not completely WinCE's fault, as most of the developers using WinCE didn't give a rat's ass about making a good port.

    Homebrew developers can also build games using gcc. Several emulators and even a version of Linux have come to Dreamcast using this toolkit.

    Conclusion: Don't associate the Dreamcast with Windows CE.

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
  125. On a more serious note by theantix · · Score: 1

    As a Win32 programmer, it is a good thing that Microsoft is following the lead from free software. While obviously they didn't invent the process (they didn't claim to either) I am very happy that the learning process is taking place. With free software taking UI and usability clues from Microsoft, and Microsoft taking feedback and compatibility (XML/SOAP etc) clues from free software... the world is getting better software from both sides! As a developer I congratulate both.

    --
    501 Not Implemented
  126. Let me tell you where MS can embed it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Ok Bill, bend over

  127. MS ROCKS!!! by quantaman · · Score: 1, Funny

    I can't see why so many people seem mad at MS. Don't you realize this is just another humanitarian effort of the part of the world's greatest philanthropist Bill Gates. MS is just trying to save people the pain of using an unstable, overpriced, insecure, banking system as well as stop the flow of open source application made by greedy, unscrupulous, devil worshipping, European communist infiltrators attempting to overthrow democracy through their subversive operating systems. If you think about it it is really your ethical duty to help stop the loss of freedom and support Microsoft's well intentioned attempts to improve (as if that were possible!) their software.

    By the way DMCA rocks!!
    (protect the right of song artists and support the RIAA, another well intentioned organization with only the intrests of song artists and music in heart!)

    --
    I stole this Sig
  128. Re:Screw XP by gpinzone · · Score: 1

    No, that was the Apple. The Amiga was a next gen game console with a keyboard attached to it. It was so powerful, everyone thought it was really a computer.

  129. And more advertising. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the banks won't stop there. They're going to sell the ad space. You'll have to see Bob Dole watching the Pepsi sluts before you may have your money.

  130. Nice huge typo on that page by iamnetboy · · Score: 1

    I love how they have a nice big typo for "Embedded Windows CP" instead of "XP" ... in a nice, large type size. Someone missed a key, slightly :)

  131. Re: "guaranteed to have a driver available" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt kernel was designed to be all of the above and as we all know xp runs nt kernel

  132. takes one to know one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I feel I must point out you are on Slashdot...therefore by your own logic you are an idiot as well.

  133. hey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they can have XP on all the embedded devices they want, but its gonna be hard to cram a 500mhz x86 processor, 128mb ram, a new video card(probably from nVidia) for alpha blending and interface effects, and a 15 monitor all into a pda. Or am I missing something? :D

  134. Why the hell was this modded flamebait? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and why was it modded a troll?

    What sort of idiot moderator was responsible for that?

    1. Re:Why the hell was this modded flamebait? by MongooseCN · · Score: 2

      Microsoft organizing its employees to advocate their embedded products in online newsgroups

      Maybe that has something to do with it...

  135. And why the hell is this flamebait? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe there's a moderator out there who's been clicking "-1, Flamebait" in mistake for "+1, Funny"?

  136. Please insert the Windows XP installation media... by leonbrooks · · Score: 2

    ...and press any key.

    Microsoft is not used to handing out money for anything except marketing, so I need to search the installation medium for the necessary driver.

    Please wait, and ignore any ghasps or screams of pain and rage which may occur during this process.

    [--OK--] [--Easier-to-forget-about-the-money--] [--Too-drunk-to-care--] [--Screenshot--]

    .

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  137. Friend by leonbrooks · · Score: 2
    (War over religion) You're basically killing each other to see who's got the better imaginary friend. - Richard Jeni

    Or, in the case of the Reign of Terror and/or sundry ``Communist'' regimes, killing each other for having an ``imaginary friend.''

    imagine that... or that... or that...

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  138. This IS Lucent, WinModem maker, being discussed? by leonbrooks · · Score: 2
    embedded NT/XP would be the new OS on these switches over the UNIX-based OS that has been running them for the last 10-15 years.

    That's so the tech support people for the other Windows-based products get a legitimate break every so often from all of those whining users. And the users feel better because the tech support people have had a taste of what they face every morning. Sorry, our 'phone system went down and we couldn't find the installation CD.
    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  139. XP == ? by leonbrooks · · Score: 2

    eXcess Pieces?

    eXtra Pieces?

    comes in X Pieces, some assembly required?

    you've heard about bits, well here they are... the XP From Scratch distribution... (-:

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  140. Re:Windows XP Deeply Embedded by leonbrooks · · Score: 2
    You keep saying that word.

    Embedded? It means that the kiosk weighs so much by the time you've got it all optioned up to work acceptably, that it embeds itself in the pavement.

    512MB plus gigabytes of disk for basic OS plus database components? Suuure... I can probably give you that in 512K of RAM and on one floppy! Give me a superdrive floppy and and 16MB and you can have a complete, all-singing, all dancing diskless kiosk (Galeon on FB on Linux) built out of commodity OSS components.

    You want me to do embedded XP? No worries, but you supply the shovel.
    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  141. Developers: Win XP Embedded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Shouldn't that read:


    Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, *wheeze*, Developers, Developers, WinXP Embedded?

  142. Great.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So now rather than be "incommunicative," Microsoft is going to become the biggest, highest budget spamming corportation on Usenet. That sounds like -real- fun. I wonder how many messages in comp.os.linux.* are now going to start with "well I don't know, but if you use Windows embedded products..?"

  143. Marks a change, all right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Famously, it's Microsoft's head that's always been embedded up its ass.

  144. Remember those old spoof stickers? by Scoria · · Score: 1

    "Evil Inside?" Art imitating life, I tell ya...

    --
    Do you like German cars?
  145. I've seen 2 embedded NT BSOD's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One on an airline schedule-thing, the one that tells you when the planes come- That was in 1998.
    And one last week, on a Megatouch XL (someone kept winning the "tell the difference" game.)
    So it does happen.

  146. NYC MEtrocard Vending Machines!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First couple of weeks they had the system up, I kept seeing BSOD's and error messages on em.
    Also, when a technician comes, you can see what OS their running, it has a diagnostic program.
    Nice machines, looks like they have a happy hacking keyboard or equivalent inside (for when the techs fix em.)

  147. Cool, I'm gonna have a watch with DVD! by philipx · · Score: 1

    I checked the sys requirements and I thought I'm going to die laughing.

    It's embedded yet it needs a CD-ROM or DVD and a Microsoft compatible mouse. How the hell am I going to stash a DVD in my watch ?!?

    philip

    --
    __________
    Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace!
  148. Re:60% DOS.... my arse -- medical device with dos? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I won' t mention any names, but in working along side and for several medical companies (software and hardware), I'll tell you that when you go to the hospital, as a geek, you would truly lose your mind in paranoia if you knew what most of those devices were running. Not to mention the systems that do claims processing. Fear. :) DOS is everywhere. Be glad though-- they have much higher success rates than any flavor of recent windows software running similar devices.

  149. Duh! by thenoog · · Score: 1

    Duh! This is Microsoft enlisting their employees to do marketing for them. Next their employment agreements will read "Employee agrees not to discuss any software vendor in public or private, with the exception of making statements approved by Microsoft Marketing"

    --
    - In a knowledge based industry your main asset will always be people -
  150. whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    like, who really fucking cares about mod points anyways...losers!

  151. I saw one running OS/2 once by t0qer · · Score: 1

    No joke either, thing had completly crashed to the desktop. Thank god there was no mouse or keyboard attatched. I could imagine the diagnostic control panel could be used for devious things by a person with the right ./mindset to know what to start looking for.

    Ah yes, the bill dispenser unit test screen! Click Click Click Click

  152. API lock-in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think one reason you see Windows variants in places where it definitely shouldn't be are because we have millions of programmers that only know Win32 and/or MFC. Many programmers think "CopyMemory()" before "memcpy()". Same goes for working with time; in the Windows API header files dealing with the time_t type, lots of things are marked "deprecated". A colleague and I fought for days to write some code to manipulate time using the Win32 functions, and then realized that handling time with time_t (and the "deprecated" functions) was standard, and *much* more well designed.

  153. Get off your horse. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    Those are not 'critical' applications, and not the traditional embedded market either.

    If a slot machine crashes, and needs to be restarted, it's not a disaster. The same for an ATM. SO long as neither will hand out oodles of cash for no reason, it's okay.

    However, the flight control mechanims on a billion dollar spacecraft, or passenger jet, or fighter jet, those are *real* embedded systems.

    The OS on your pacemaker, the computer in your car that controls the ABS... these are the kinds of things he means when he speaks of the 'traditional' embedded market.

    Or how I like to think if it, 'computers inside things that aren't computers'. (A slot machine is kind of a computer, so is an ATM. but a car?)

    1. Re:Get off your horse. by ahde · · Score: 2

      4 registers would be overkill for a pacemaker, what kind of gui would it's os need?