Slashdot Mirror


SuSE 8.0 Now Shipping

MobyTurbo writes "Well, it's technically a day late, but SuSE Linux 8.0 is now shipping. The increase from 7.3 to 8.0 is due to the inclusion of KDE 3.0, a SuSE-modified kernel version 2.4.18 (with Andre's VM), an improved firewall, among other packages that have been upgraded or added. (Including a couple of new games. :-) )"

293 comments

  1. kiss my... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    bumperdumper

    Thanks.

  2. i installed it last night by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and it has a couple of problems. they still haven't fixed the memory resource allocator driver ide problem from 6.2.34. also, my pcmcia universal drive-part table is unsupported.

    1. Re:i installed it last night by Haltok · · Score: 1

      where can i get it? none of the suse mirrors have it yet. thoughts?

  3. Eeezzzzy by Lappie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm still very impressed with the automaticity of the installation of my 7.3. Almost everything worked out of the box, without one glitch. I'm certain I'll be the first to buy me the 8.0 box when it's in de shops here in Europe.

    1. Re:Eeezzzzy by Tha_Zanthrax · · Score: 1

      SuSe is german..
      I'm pretty sure it's available in Europe at the same time it is in the US.
      maybe even sooner.

    2. Re:Eeezzzzy by tedric · · Score: 1

      In Germany SuSE 8.0 is available for approximatly two weeks now.

    3. Re:Eeezzzzy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh so you like the "automatic" installation process, huh? Microsoft has been doing this long before the Linux community thought it was "useful". The linux crowd always prided themselves on the fact that linux didn't have a toy like interface (a Microsoft weakness), well now they realize no one is going to use it if it is not easy to use. However, no one is going to use it anyway, because Linux is still 5 years behind Windows...

      Nuff said..

    4. Re:Eeezzzzy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suse 8.0 just got better. Sifting through mounds of text files will not be required to configure this puppy. Just pop it in, tell it what to do, and you have it right there in front of you...a good dose of excellent computing power. :)

      --Jb

  4. Suse is great by ulbador · · Score: 1

    Suse has always been a great distro, if not a bit bloated at times {though anymore they all are}

    1. Re:Suse is great by hs81 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      SuSe has always been a bit bloated but they have made huge efforts to allow the user to select what they want to install and later on to install/upgrade new packages. I have used RedHat and SuSe for several years and if anyone asks me what distro to go for I say try SuSe bacause I have so much respect for the install process.

    2. Re:Suse is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Debian is not bloated :)

    3. Re:Suse is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and it's only 5 years out of date. Great.

    4. Re:Suse is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, let me get this straight; it wasn't OK for Microsoft to have what you called: "bloated code", but now it's OK for Linux to be bloated. Make up your mind!

  5. in 2 weeks... by morgajel · · Score: 1

    depending on if I can find the ISO's, I'll give it a try when I fully convert my system over from win2k.

    I tried SuSe before, and it was really cool, but it's gonna have a hardtime beating debian as my desktop OS of choice.

    it's determinate on whether or not they have the ISO's available... if they don't, they're losing out on me as a user. probably alot of others as well.

    and yes, I do plan on buying the distro I decide on.

    --
    Looking for Book Reviews? Check out Literary Escapism.
    1. Re:in 2 weeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There are no officially available ISOs of SuSE distributions. You can wait for the setup files to show up on the SuSE ftp server and do an online installation or try the (also not-yet-released) evaluation version, which is a system configured to run directly from CD.

    2. Re:in 2 weeks... by Lappie · · Score: 1
      I would certainly check it out. Debian still is my favorite server distro, but I find it lacking in the automatic(!!) support of new(er) hardware. It all requires a little more knowledge and time than I'm, personally, willing to spend on (any) linux setup or linux box.

      IMveryHO distro's like SuSE, Mandrake and Redhat (although I've never used recent versions of the latter two) will be what will open the mainstream (home computing) market a little more. Just because they are little easier to install and, after that easy installation, look a lot flashier than something like Debian, which requires a lot more work to look fancy.

    3. Re:in 2 weeks... by 0123456789 · · Score: 1

      SuSE don't provide ISOs. But you can install by ftp direct from their ftp server or a mirror. See here (in English) for details. I'd recommend SuSE highly, I'm using SuSE 7.3 at the moment, but will upgrade once I get around to buying the set (downloaded the last couple of versions I used, feel obliged to contribute some money...).

    4. Re:in 2 weeks... by CynicTheHedgehog · · Score: 2

      I *just* bought 7.3...does SuSE offer upgrade discounts?

    5. Re:in 2 weeks... by grahamm · · Score: 1

      Yes. You can buy the update edition, which contains the same 7 CDs and 1 DVD as the professional edition but with only an "update" paper manual. (The other manuals are still provided in electronic format in various languages.)

    6. Re:in 2 weeks... by oever · · Score: 1

      Yes they do. As a matter of fact, the upgrade versions, are simply the complete distro without all the books. So if you can read slashdot, you can probably buy the upgrade version and install it without problems. It's half the price.

      Of course, as a good slashdot reader, you best support this nice distro and buy the full version. ;^)

      Or just buy the SuSE upgrade and buy Mandrake with the money you saved. They can use the money because of their delayed boxed distribution distribution.

      --
      DNA is the ultimate spaghetti code.
    7. Re:in 2 weeks... by morgajel · · Score: 1

      sold-
      I prefer ftp installs anyways.

      my next thought is how close their upgrade utility is to apt-get or rpm-
      does anyone know of a good place to get distro comparisons? I'd really like to see the strengths and weaknesses of this vs. redhat and debian.

      --
      Looking for Book Reviews? Check out Literary Escapism.
    8. Re:in 2 weeks... by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      depending on if I can find the ISO's, I'll give it a try when I fully convert my system over from win2k.

      In the past, SuSE hasn't provided distros - you have a folder with 7 CD-Roms and a DVD. All the packages are online, however, and a ftp or "download 'em and install" is possible, however, you then say...

      I tried SuSe before, and it was really cool, but it's gonna have a hardtime beating debian as my desktop OS of choice.

      You can apt-get it. No, really. Although I don't know how much of a stub of a SuSE install you need (and I *seriously* doubt you can go from debian to SuSE without much anguish). Technically, apt-get is for upgrades, and the repository base, or whatever you call it is on ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/suse/apt/, and you need apt4rpm at http://apt4rpm.sourceforge.net/. 7.3 and 8.0 are unofficially supported, but are reputed to work find, and that's an offical SuSE mirror site as well.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    9. Re:in 2 weeks... by ocelotbob · · Score: 1
      my next thought is how close their upgrade utility is to apt-get or rpm-
      SuSE is rpm-based, and does have a few quirks as to package names which may come into play every now and then. All in all, though, it's a pretty nice distro.
      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    10. Re:in 2 weeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can't be worse than rpm: it is built on rpm.

    11. Re:in 2 weeks... by StarTux · · Score: 2, Informative

      You'll be able to do an FTP install in about 3 weeks to 4 weeks.

      They do have an eval CD that is an ISO though.

    12. Re:in 2 weeks... by Walterk · · Score: 1

      SuSE policy is (or at least used to be) to only release ISOs of releases that are about one or 2 versions behind, so you can download a 6.4 ISO or 7.0.. You have to be careful though, because there is a Live Evaluation and an evaluation, the former being only able to boot of CD-ROM, the latter being a toned version of just 1 CD.. So if you want a 8.0 ISO then you might have to wait a few months..

    13. Re:in 2 weeks... by platos_beard · · Score: 2, Funny
      You'll be able to do an FTP install in about 3 weeks to 4 weeks.

      You really ought to get DSL or something if it takes that long

      --
      What's a sig?
    14. Re:in 2 weeks... by Jinky · · Score: 1

      ISOs? Had them a week ago :) SuSE 8.0 is muchly nice, that it is. Installer is still as good as in 7.3, picked up everything on my lappy, including the nasty token ring pcmcia card.

    15. Re:in 2 weeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having used a variety of distros, including Suse, why does anyone use anything other than Debian? Debian just works, period. It is *very* robust, and apt-get is absolutely superb.

      Seriously, it is beyond my comprehension why anyone would use a version of Linux other than Debian.

    16. Re:in 2 weeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ISO's (all 7 of them) are available using EDonkey (p2p program, www.edonkey2000.com) right now. It's 7 disks but the last two are supposedly just source so you dont need them unless your into that kinda stuff.

    17. Re:in 2 weeks... by Andreas(R) · · Score: 1

      I purchased Suse 7.0 personal, and would like up upgrade to 8.0 pro. Can I then buy the 8.0 pro upgrade?

    18. Re:in 2 weeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As they said, the upgrade is the same as the full distribution, it just doesn't have all of the manuals.

    19. Re:in 2 weeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can apt-get SuSE 7.3 and 8.0! Refer to http://apt4rpm.sf.net for more information. Follow the link called "apt-rpm reps".

    20. Re:in 2 weeks... by Captain+Smooth · · Score: 2, Informative

      SuSE DOES provide ISOs. Just not for i386 CPUs. You can get them for PPC, SPARC, and Alpha though. :-)

      --


      The ability to monopolize an industry is insignificant, next to the power of the source.
    21. Re:in 2 weeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd really like to see the strengths and weaknesses of this vs. redhat and debian.

      Hmmm, let's see. Oh yeah...Debian users are all a bunch of irritating zealots with their heads stuck up their collective asses.

    22. Re:in 2 weeks... by ozp1 · · Score: 0

      I use other distro than DEBIAN, I use mandrake and I want to try suse. Why? because I cant install debian, is not just as easy. And madrake is hard, I can use only linux because it's too hard to learn. I have lot of stuff to do that cannot wait

    23. Re:in 2 weeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, it is beyond my comprehension why anyone would use a version of Linux other than Debian.

      Becuase of self righteous narrow minded cocksuckers like youself?

    24. Re:in 2 weeks... by yaba · · Score: 1

      There is just one upgrade. No matter from what version you are upgrading you always get the pro version.

    25. Re:in 2 weeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, great.
      I'll order the pro upgrade version then :)

    26. Re:in 2 weeks... by andrewscraig · · Score: 1

      I have official ISO's here right now - and am running it at home. I ordered it through suse.co.uk a couple of weeks ago, and it arrived on Monday evening (8.0 Pro. Update).

  6. I was wondering... by mikkado · · Score: 1

    how this compares to Lycoris? Because if there is one distribution that's suited for normal users, it's lycoris. Suse has been trying hard to reacdh the same goal, but version 7 was still far off....

  7. First distro? by ciryon · · Score: 2

    This must be the first distro shipping KDE3, or am I mistaken?

    1. Re:First distro? by Deacon+Jones · · Score: 1
      You are not mistaken.

      At least not according to Suse themselves. http://www.suse.com/us/products/suse_linux/i386/kd e3.html

      --
      I pulled a jack move to cop this sig
    2. Re:First distro? by (startx) · · Score: 1

      well, it's been in slackware-current for a few weeks, but I guess that's not technically a "shipping" distro yet. However, slackware-8.1 does seem to be shaping up quite nicely and looks like it might be out any day now.

    3. Re:First distro? by MoogMan · · Score: 1

      Well, the first distro 'available' with KDE3 was RedHat SkipJack (ie 7.3beta1), but its still in beta since it uses the KDE3beta2 I think

  8. Can't update online to it yet. by Deacon+Jones · · Score: 1

    The online update tool in 7.3 does not automagically update to this version yet, and the 8.0 files aren't present in Suse's ftp server. So at the moment it would appear that 8.0 is only available for purchase, not for download/online upgrade.

    --
    I pulled a jack move to cop this sig
    1. Re:Can't update online to it yet. by rmstar · · Score: 1

      It just makes business sense.

      Does anybody know if they plan releasing a download edition at some point?

      rmstar

    2. Re:Can't update online to it yet. by Garen · · Score: 1

      From what I recall from previous updates, they show up on their ftp servers about a month after being released.

    3. Re:Can't update online to it yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't they have to release the sources at the same time as shipping the distro due to GPL?
      Dunno about rpm's, though.

  9. What are the advantages of Suse over RH, Mandrake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just curious.

  10. Great! by GnomeKing · · Score: 1

    Wow!
    new games???
    great! well worth the download!

    and I spose including KDE 3.0 is a plus point too...

  11. RedHat by BlueTooth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, unlike RedHat, they have a legitimate reason for a major version increment?

    --
    SPAM
    1. Re:RedHat by Lappie · · Score: 1

      In my opinion they have. From the 7.1 to 7.3 installation has been improved greatly IMHO. I expect that this trend will continu. Besides this, they are the first distro to include KDE3 as their standard desktop.

    2. Re:RedHat by software_non_olet · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, they simply had to follow the market leader in their version numbering.

      Small changes - and I don't see a KDE 3.0 as such a BiG change to justify a major version increment for the whole distro.

      Appearantly, they focused their efforts lately on 8.0 polishing, hence I feel it's better than 7.3. After all, the new kernel is worth the upgrade for my taste (that is if you don't go for Red Hat).

      KDE 3.0 is as stable as the old version (ahem). And the installation speed is said to have improved (according to SuSE's advertisments). The latter I don't know much about, because I had to go for a coffee, and a snack and make some telefon calls until the installer gave me the obligatory error messages about some packages which I had to reinstall later by hand etc. (I mean after having tried the whole game 3 times in vain, with deinstalling and reinstalling via the cludgy YAST installer.

      I should've stayed with Red Hat, but that could as well be my illusion, that the grass on the other side of my reality-fence is allways greener.

      After one month (and 4 servers) experience I'd say:

      You can use it, but you mustn't. If you allready have a SuSE, it's OK to upgrade. Especially if your servers are in Europe, the support for local ISDN and DSL services and hardware is probably (or should I say slightly) better than from US distros.

      Acceptable.

    3. Re:RedHat by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      SuSE has typically adhered to a "quarterly" release format, which means 6.0, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3 and then 7.0. It's been pretty regular the past few releases, except for 8.0 which has been a bit long in coming.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:RedHat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mods are idiots...I wish I hadn't run out of pts or I would troll your ass.

    5. Re:RedHat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite honestly, I am tired of these petty arguments about version numbers. Does it really matter? THe avid linix user knows what they are getting despite the version number of the distro. If you are concerned for the new users getting confused by it, well, all i can say is there are alot of people who think they are running windows 97, (not office 97)

  12. Reviews... by Iberian · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=6015 If you are looking for a review before you just go out and buy software based on free code. Any readers actually have the product yet. Impressions....

    1. Re:Reviews... by KingKire64 · · Score: 1

      For the Lazy People Or maybe im _That_ Lazy

      --
      "All I can tell the "lesser of two evils" folks is that if they keep voting for evil, they'll keep getting evil."-Lp.org
    2. Re:Reviews... by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1


      Oh for the love of! We are too lazy to copy and paste, please provide a link next time.

      Thanks.

    3. Re:Reviews... by d3xt3r · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I have been running SuSE since 7.0 and have purchased 7.1-7.3 and each release has brought more features and better integration to an already great distro. I don't have 8.0 yet, but when it arrives, I can almost guarantee that I'll be happy with it. =)

      Like Red Hat, SuSE releases their own patched version of the Linux kernel which have always been extremely fast and reliable (in my experience) and their installation is easy. The other nice thing is the setup tool, Yast2, it's the best integrated setup/control center tool I've seen yet.

      The nice thing about SuSE is that everything just works. SuSE offers upgrades to KDE and GNOME that can be downloaded and installed automatically with Yast Online Update on the same day that KDE and GNOME annouce their new releases. They are definitely on top of things. Also, Yast can be used to configure just about every aspect of the system, no need whatsoever to edit config files.

      Another nice thing about SuSE is that it's Oracle certified. SuSE offers a nice rpm that sets the system up for installing and running Oracle, making installation as simple as on Windows (at least for 9i).

      I've tried Red Hat, Mandrake, SuSE and debian and I am happiest by far with SuSE. It has easier config tools than Mandrake, the speed and reliability of Red Hat, and the advantage that it is commercially supported by many companies, meaning that if a product claims it will run on linux, it WILL run on SuSE Linux. :-)

    4. Re:Reviews... by seiotek · · Score: 1

      I just bought it and I love it, every aspect is great. Highly recommend it!

      --
      "Keep on Tuxin"
    5. Re:Reviews... by wishus · · Score: 2

      I have been running SuSE since 7.0 and have purchased 7.1-7.3

      Do you upgrade your existing system (with the upgrade option) or back up your data and install fresh every time?

      I am curious, because the last time I tried someone's "update" feature to upgrade my system (1997, Redhat 4.0) it made a mess. Since then, I have been backing up and installing fresh every time.

      I currently run SuSE 7.2 and would like to move to 8.0 - so my question is, have you found SuSE's update to be clean, or should I continue to back up and install fresh?

  13. Re:8.0 should have 2.5 by AngryAndDrunk · · Score: 1

    There won't be a release with kernel 2.5, that's the development branch. The next stable kernel, ie the one targetted at the not quite so bleeding edge users amongst us, will be 2.6.

  14. Re:8.0 should have 2.5 by GnomeKing · · Score: 1

    I would hope no distro includes 2.5

    atleast while kernel.org is calling it a beta kernel

  15. Sun's Grid Engine comes with SuSE 8.0 by Xpilot · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sun's Grid Engine is included in SuSE 8.0... I think that's a significant addition, as grid computing becomes the "hot" topic amongst CS researchers nowadays. Good to see Linux on the cutting edge.

    --
    "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    1. Re:Sun's Grid Engine comes with SuSE 8.0 by prefect42 · · Score: 1

      Not something to get too excited about. I'm part of a team working with Grid Engine on Globus, and it's not a pretty sight.

      jh

      --

      jh

  16. Re:8.0 should have 2.5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2.5 would be a beta kernel. I think you mean 2.6.

  17. Already in store by it0 · · Score: 1

    I believe I saw it already available at a local software store in the Netherlands yesterday...

  18. Get the Whole Load by 4of12 · · Score: 2

    I'm running SuSE 7.3 and have bought their distros since 6.1.

    I really like the way that SuSE comes with so many applications that you can install. With large disks, there's little reason to be without any of the many open source applications out there.

    Yes, once in a while you can see the European origins of this distribution, like in the A4 bias for default paper sizes, but generally they're pretty good about providing "en" language users a good interface.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:Get the Whole Load by meringuoid · · Score: 1

      Yes, once in a while you can see the European origins of this distribution, like in the A4 bias for default paper sizes, but generally they're pretty good about providing "en" language users a good interface. What, you mean with default currency set to '£', for instance?

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:Get the Whole Load by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, once in a while you can see the European origins of this distribution, like in the A4 bias for default paper sizes, but generally they're pretty good about providing "en" language users a good interface. A4 is the standard papersize for "en" as well (i.e. in the UK), so that may explain it.

    3. Re:Get the Whole Load by 4of12 · · Score: 2

      That sounds like an outdated currency to me, kind of like shillings, farthings, and halfpennies!

      Living in the US, saddled as we are with the onerous legacy of what used to be the British system of measurements (miles, feet, gallons, pints, pounds, furlongs per fortnight, other nondecimal abominations), I think it is only fitting and fair that the UK be dragged kicking and screaming into using the new &euro and giving up the dear £.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    4. Re:Get the Whole Load by CrazyBusError · · Score: 1

      It may have escaped your attention, but we got rid of most of the old imperial measurements. (With the exception of miles and I'm not complaining about that)

      As for joining the Euro? No thanks, trying to link several wildly varying economies into one currency has always been sheer lunacy as far as I'm concerned. Anyway, I take it that means when the new global currency comes out that you guys will be binning the dollar? No, didn't think so...

      --
      -Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience-
    5. Re:Get the Whole Load by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only "en" language users that would object to A4 being the default paper size are people in the US.

      Hardly the majority of English language speakers... And SuSE is a german distro. Why would they make it 'Letter' and alienate 95% of their users?

    6. Re:Get the Whole Load by grahamm · · Score: 2

      Why not let the default paper size depend on the locale? That way you would get Letter with en_US and A4 with en_GB etc.

    7. Re:Get the Whole Load by mpe · · Score: 2

      Living in the US, saddled as we are with the onerous legacy of what used to be the British system of measurements (miles, feet, gallons, pints, pounds, furlongs per fortnight, other nondecimal abominations),

      You do realise that what are called "English" measurments in the US are actually somewhat unique to the US? Some of them, such as the inch (25.4 mm) are actually defined in terms of metric measurments. Until 60 years ago the English (US) and Imperial (used in the British empire and later commonwealth) were actually different. Measuments of volume are different between the two systems.

    8. Re:Get the Whole Load by mpe · · Score: 2

      Yes, once in a while you can see the European origins of this distribution, like in the A4 bias for default paper sizes, but generally they're pretty good about providing "en" language users a good interface.

      Metric paper is used in most of the world. There is also a simple mathematical relationship with A size paper, especially useful if you want to directly print booklets or to resize to a different paper size.
      There is an "en_US" locale, does that have something like "US_Letter" as the default paper size?

    9. Re:Get the Whole Load by meringuoid · · Score: 1

      Well, we've now got rid of pretty much all the old Imperial measurements. We still measure road distances in miles, and we still drink in pints. Everything else is primarily metric now. And a good thing too. The only people under the age of about forty who can understand ounces are cannabis dealers.

      There was some fuss recently about some street trader who got in trouble with trading standards officers for selling bananas or something by the pound (pound weight, not pound cost). Tabloid fury, Europe, fascism, Our British Heritage, yadda, yadda. Of course he's entitled to sell them by the pound, or by the elephant, or by the gigatonne, or by whatever weird or wonderful measure he can think of. The trouble was that he didn't mark 'em in metric as well...

      As for the Euro, we'll join as soon as (a) Gordon thinks it won't spoil his bank balance too much, and (b) Tony thinks he can win a referendum on the matter. Speculation is continual over exactly when this will be, but a referendum next spring seems a popular bet. That'd put us in the euro properly two or three years down the line.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    10. Re:Get the Whole Load by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "mathmatical" relationship is completely pointless, and standard paper sizes are also used all over the world as well, for example Canada.

    11. Re:Get the Whole Load by choco · · Score: 1

      >Everything else is primarily metric now.

      Unfortunately that just isn't universally true. I frequently design PCBs in the UK. I'd like to refer you to this UK PCB maker. Follow the links and note the crazy mish-mash of units. E.G. Board dimensions are specified in inches in two directions - and mm in the third!

      Getting back onto topic, one of the nice things I've found about Suse is that it generally does offer good, wide support for multiple currencies, units and formats for things like date, time and paper size.

      If this means some people in the USA have to change from A4 defaults this might be a good thing. Certain USA based operating systems can be a real PITA for us Europeans. Certain combinations of Windows / printer drvier / application seem to require the paper size to be changed in three different places before you get sane results.

      --
      AJB
    12. Re:Get the Whole Load by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad I don't have the choice to not install some of the useless open-source tools. Personally, I only want XFree86 and KDE 3.0 and some basic apps. But it forces me to install so much other stuff. My base install was approx. 1GB! That is twice the size of a base win2k/xp install.

      By the way, why doesn't the Linux kernel support wireless USB yet? Windows has had support for wireless USB since win98.

  19. SuSE 8.0 by noodlez84 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Anyone interested should view the SuSE Linux 8.0 page.

    • Reasons to Use SuSE Linux
    • Choose from among XFS, ext2, ext3, reiserfs, and others during install
    • choose to encrypt your filesystem
    • free security updates, unlike RedHat
    • improved YaST2, the ultamite in system configuration utilities, let's you configure everything from a DHCP server to CUPS
    • YaST Online Update, for automatic upgrading of your RPMs
    • conformance to the LSB, the only compliant distro so far
    • the most secure distro, according to LWN.net research
    • Personal Firewall configuration through YaST
    • 90 days of tech support through email or telephone with the Professional version
    1. Re:SuSE 8.0 by waspleg · · Score: 1

      well.. i just put mdk 8.2 on my laptop, i bought hte 5.3 SuSE box set a while back.. i was impressed at the time until i found half the documentation in german, a fucked up hacked series of init scripts (rc.d and its ilk) and YaST which i utterly loathe.. it was quickly re-replaced with slackware at the time.. i'm sure they've come a way since then but old biases die hard ;)

    2. Re:SuSE 8.0 by reaper20 · · Score: 3, Informative

      # free security updates, unlike RedHat

      gee, I better uninstall those Redhat security updates, apparently they're not aware that they were supposed to be charging me for them. Thanks for spreading misinformation.

    3. Re:SuSE 8.0 by agi · · Score: 2, Informative

      > free security updates, unlike RedHat

      AFAIK all Linux distros offer free security updates. And even not security related updates. Including RedHat.

      --
      EOF
    4. Re:SuSE 8.0 by Matts · · Score: 2

      Conectiva 8.0 (in beta now) is also LSB compliant, fwiw.

      I'm really looking forward to when Red Hat finally moves to LSB compliance. Maybe then we'll be able to take almost any RPM, be it Red Hat, SuSE or Conectiva, and install it on any linux distribution without worrying too much about wierd issues.

      --

      Matt. Want XML + Apache + Stylesheets? Get AxKit.
    5. Re:SuSE 8.0 by prefect42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Reasons for using it over any other major linux distro:

      # Choose from among XFS, ext2, ext3, reiserfs, and others during install

      Nope, Mandrake's the same.

      # choose to encrypt your filesystem

      Mmm, same.

      # free security updates, unlike RedHat

      Wrong.

      # improved YaST2, the ultamite in system configuration utilities, let's you configure everything from a DHCP server to CUPS

      Just what we need, and also covered (badly) by webmin/linuxconf on other distros.

      # YaST Online Update, for automatic upgrading of your RPMs

      Same as mandrake.

      I've yet to see anything major to swing me. I'm far too used to the old tools (chkconfig, ifconfig) and the like that it doesn't make much difference which distro I use, linux or otherwise. That's one of the main reasons I'm against pushing things like YaST2 too hard, or people will simply turn linux into open source M$.

      jh

      --

      jh

    6. Re:SuSE 8.0 by chess · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The most interesting thing is that they broke up /etc/rc.config. AFAIR the comment in the file it should resemble the Red Hat way now...

      chess

    7. Re:SuSE 8.0 by bogie · · Score: 1

      I'm not making a value statement here, but its ironic that you should try to take a jab at redhat yet again when suse itself is not free . You can now and always will be able to download free redhat ISO's. Suse on the otherhand will only allow you download an eval or do an ftp install. Until you can buy a Suse iso at cheapbytes or download official iso's I would avoid taking cheap shots like this. This reminds me of a post not long ago when the new Freebsd came out and the poster mentioned several good points about bsd then tried to slip in something about redhat being a "train wreck". He was modded a +5 until the mods came to their senses and dropped him to -1 Troll. Sometimes I think the pissing MS does on Opensource is nothing compared to how much its users piss on each other already.

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    8. Re:SuSE 8.0 by bcjanes · · Score: 2, Informative

      Red Hat updates are free. It's called up2date, and the registration through Red Hat Network costs nothing for a single user.

      And it's not just the updates, you can install new packages through up2date. Up2date will download and install the necessary dependancies automatically as well, again at no cost for a single user.

      --
      Linux is unix training wheels, while BSD *is* unix.
    9. Re:SuSE 8.0 by Raphael · · Score: 1, Troll

      There were lots of good reasons to use SuSE until version 7.3. But this is not true anymore with version 8.0: they have removed support for the original YaST installation tool.

      As a result, the users are now forced to use YaST 2, which depends on Qt. So far, I have managed to install all my PCs without the Qt libraries (this is a personal choice because I prefer GTK+, not something that I recommend) using the original YaST. In the 7.x versions, YaST was issuing some warnings saying that Qt was a necessary component and that it should be installed anyway, but I could safely ignore this warning and get a fully working system without it. It looks like this is not possible anymore with SuSE 8.0.

      I have used every single release of SuSE Linux since version 4.3 several years ago, and I praised them for their excellent installation and internationalization. But now it looks like I will have to select another distribution if I do not find a way to bypass YaST 2. :-(

      Moderators note: this is intended to be a public complaint, not a flame. But if you think that it should be moderated as Flamebait because you disaprove my choice of toolkits, then feel free to do it.

      --
      -Raphaël
    10. Re:SuSE 8.0 by Moritz+Moeller+-+Her · · Score: 4, Informative



      >As a result, the users are now forced to use YaST 2,
      >which depends on Qt.

      NOT TRUE. yast2 has several frontends, you can use it with a curses interface.

      Also, why anyone would use SuSE and be opposed to QT libs is indeed quite strange. No rational decision obviously.

      --
      Moritz
    11. Re:SuSE 8.0 by inquis · · Score: 2

      It's possible to run YaST2 from the console in text mode, that's why the dumped the original YaST.

    12. Re:SuSE 8.0 by deKernel · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but my Caldera 3.1.1 offers all of that plus more. Everybody seems to po-po Caldera, and for the life of me I can't figure out why. I never have had it crash. Plus, to me, it seems to just respond faster than RH7.2 with Pre-emp patches applied to the 2.4.17 kernel.
      Please don't think that I am knocking SuSE, but don't think that it is the only distro with those features.

    13. Re:SuSE 8.0 by ThatComputerGuy · · Score: 1

      improved YaST2, the ultamite in system configuration utilities

      But does it come with ispell?

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    14. Re:SuSE 8.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God forbid it become easy to use and less mysterious for non-geeks. That would take away your toy and make you less special, wouldn't it?

      Tell you what, be "cutting edge" and go play with the Mac fans, they seem to all have attitudes just like yours. Linux doesn't need people like you; please don't burden it with your xenophobia.

    15. Re:SuSE 8.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Caldera continues to shit all over the linux community. That is why everyone poops on it. Caldera has continued to dis linux on the desktop and server and push its own lame unix.
      Also caldera was the first distro to try to start charging a per seat license fee.
      I'm not the free or die type, but I'll be damned if I am going to pay for a linux disto when you can get redhat, mandrake, or debian for free. These are IMHO better than caldera regardless of cost.

    16. Re:SuSE 8.0 by 2br02b · · Score: 1

      Don't think that's the reason they dumped YaST - YaST2 can be run in text mode in 7.3 too.

    17. Re:SuSE 8.0 by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      The problem is that frequently, oft-changing tools abstracted by a *thick* (yes, you can have thin GUI frontends) GUI layer from the actual config files can be confusing to the people who really *do* know what they want to do, but have to put up with figuring out what exactly a graphical util is doing.

      Be nice to have a standard for listing all the changes a config file front end has made...

    18. Re:SuSE 8.0 by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      I use autoupdate, which uses ftp and is (obviously) free for unlimited users.

      I can't figure out why so many people piss on RH. Too many people that have never used anything but Debian run out and call RH a "newbie" distro.

    19. Re:SuSE 8.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also because they figure why use resources to
      support YAST when YAST2 can do the same thing.
      Not a big deal. although I was a little peaved
      at first.

    20. Re:SuSE 8.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People piss on redhat out of ouright jealousy simple as that. They have done nothing but make a free gpl distro available for years now and this is the thanks they get.
      Redhat is the reason the average person has even heard of linux.
      And to the debian fucktards, go shit yourselves linux is linux is linux.

    21. Re:SuSE 8.0 by deKernel · · Score: 1

      What do you mean "shit all over the linux community".
      Do they release their source? Yes
      Do they buy and support great products like Webmin? Yes
      Can you download the ISO for installs? Yes
      The 'pay per seat' is for businesses who will only accept products that they get support for. My guess is that you have never works in a professional enviroment so you just don't have a clue as to how run a _PROFESSIONAL_ business.
      Gee, how is the linux thang going on the desktop? Pretty piss pour in the business arena is it! Justified, no, reality, YES!!!
      Again I state, if you don't want support, then download the ISO's and install!!!

    22. Re:SuSE 8.0 by Raphael · · Score: 2
      NOT TRUE. yast2 has several frontends, you can use it with a curses interface.

      Yes, I know. This was already the case with SuSE 7.3. But in 7.3, several YaST2 packages (modules) had a depency on Qt, so installing YaST2 also meant that I would have been forced to install Qt, which is something that I wanted to avoid. Maybe this dependency has been removed in 8.0, so that I can still install my system without the Qt libraries. I have the SuSE 8.0 CDs and DVD now, so I will check that soon.

      Also, why anyone would use SuSE and be opposed to QT libs is indeed quite strange. No rational decision obviously.

      As I wrote in my previous comment, this is a personal choice. But there are some rational reasons for that: some of the machines on which I run Linux are rather old and have a rather slow CPU and not much disk space. Avoiding Qt makes sense on these machines. Also, some machines are used for cross-platform application development. Avoiding the installation of Qt is the best way to ensure that nothing that we develop will have some accidental dependencies on Qt (because there are still some licensing problems when developing Qt applications for Windows).

      Even if I do not want to install the Qt libraries, there are some good reasons to use SuSE: it has a very good installation process, it comes with tons of applications pre-packaged, it has a good support for internationalization and the filesystem encryption is included in the default kernel. The last point is important for me because at work we use Linux on several laptops. If a laptop is stolen, then we loose one machine but at least we can be reasonably sure that no thief will be able to find some confidential data on the computer.

      --
      -Raphaël
    23. Re:SuSE 8.0 by mpe · · Score: 2

      I've yet to see anything major to swing me. I'm far too used to the old tools (chkconfig, ifconfig) and the like that it doesn't make much difference which distro I use, linux or otherwise.

      One point with SuSE is that you get a very large amount of software supplied as standard in the box set. Where people do not have a high bandwidth Internet connection this can be desirable.

    24. Re:SuSE 8.0 by mpe · · Score: 2

      The problem is that frequently, oft-changing tools abstracted by a *thick* (yes, you can have thin GUI frontends) GUI layer from the actual config files can be confusing to the people who really *do* know what they want to do, but have to put up with figuring out what exactly a graphical util is doing.

      Also any kind of "wizard" type interface which attempts to enable someone to perform a complex task, which they do not understand, means that when it fails that person is left completly at a loss. Such an interface (or even a set of step by step instructions) cannot possibly cover every way in which things can go wrong.)
      Combined with those who do understand what is going on having to work around silly assumptions. e.g. insisting on installing modem and ISDN utilities on a machine which only has a NIC.

  20. Red Hat's major numbering actually makes sense by mapnjd · · Score: 1

    Er, Red Hat historically have incremented major version numbers when they've shipped major new versions of the kernel, glibc, gcc or rpm. A major number tweak at Red Hat implies binary incompatibility, package incompatibility or a real important upgrade to glibc or the kernel.

    nic

    --
    Bus error in your favour. Collect 200kB
  21. Got it! by oever · · Score: 1

    It just arrived by mail today. I can't wait to try it.

    I'm especially keen on seeing how they added Sun Gridware to the distro.

    The 8.0 has me a bit puzzled: they still compiled everything with gcc 2.95.3.

    --
    DNA is the ultimate spaghetti code.
    1. Re:Got it! by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      IIRC, in the official GCC site, it said 2.95.x had better optimizations than 3.0.x

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
  22. Other cool stuff in 8.0... by lessthan0 · · Score: 3, Informative

    SuSE 8.0 also includes:

    Sun's grid engine software
    Star Office 5.2 and Open Office 641c
    Updated YaST2 and much improved YaST2 console mode
    X 4.2
    Alsa 0.9
    One of the best firewall scripts anywhere

    Fairly major changes in how admin settings are saved, with a lot of stuff moving out of /etc/rc.config and into a Red Hat-style /etc/sysconfig. It is still managed by YaST2, just stored in a different place.

    It is polished and solid, and as always, stuffed with so much software, you could not absorb it all in several years. The upside is that almost everything you might want is in there already. SuSE may not be perfect, but they contribute huge chunks of code to the kernel, KDE, Alsa, Xfree, and NIS projects and that's good for everyone.

    Some updates to KDE3 and other packages are already posted to their ftp site, so fire up the YaST Online Update right after the install to get the new goodies.

  23. x86 only? by gecko19scl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I run SuSE 7.3 SPARC at the moment and its really good...is the new 8.0 release for i386 only? or do they have a sparc port on the way? i hope they dont kill it off like Red Hat did, they have done a really good job with 7.3 :-)

    chris

    .sig : bad command or file name

    1. Re:x86 only? by Mongr · · Score: 2, Informative

      The developers have already stated that they will skip the 8.0 release and release the next sparc at 8.1

      They also claim that dropping 32-bit sparc support is probable....though I certainly hope not.

      --
      -=Mongr=-
    2. Re:x86 only? by gecko19scl · · Score: 1

      thats a shame cos i was thinking about picking up a used sparcstation 5 :-(
      i hope they dont 2

      o well i guess im stuck with my ultra 30 *grins*

    3. Re:x86 only? by larien · · Score: 2

      Watch out with SS5's; the systems with the 170MHz CPUs have a history of being flaky with linux (they use a different architecture from the 70/110MHz models).

    4. Re:x86 only? by Mongr · · Score: 1

      Yeah....I had heard that. However, my sparc20 with dual 142 Rosses, and my sparc2 with Weitek powerup, both run flawlessly on SuSE 7.3

      --
      -=Mongr=-
    5. Re:x86 only? by gecko19scl · · Score: 1

      how fast is a sparc 2? i mean using it, is it quick or does it take ages to do anything??

      chris

    6. Re:x86 only? by Salsaman · · Score: 2
      If it's of any interest, Mandrake has just released 8.2 for PPC

  24. Re:First distro? -- Not Quite by socratic+method · · Score: 1

    Not if Gentoo Linux counts as a distribution. KDE3 had been part of the official Gentoo install set since version 1.1a, released on 8 April.

    sm

  25. Re:8.0 should have 2.5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it shouldn't. It should have the latest stable kernel, which is 2.4.18 (or maybe 19 by now).

  26. A lot of changes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    ... have come with SuSE 8:
    • YAST has gone, just YAST2 is left (as text and as X version). BTW: The text version is awfull to use
    • rc.config is away, now s
    • Boot disks aren't shipped anymore
    • Changing the dummy NVidia driver to the original one crashes X when you don't adjust it manually
    There have been a lot of other negative voices on alt.linux.suse, it seems like SuSE is doing the "buy our box and become our beta testers" like M$ :(
    And, especially when you are doing an update from 7.3 to 8 it can be tricky.
    1. Re:A lot of changes... by c=sixty4 · · Score: 2
      YAST has gone, just YAST2 is left (as text and as X version). BTW: The text version is awfull to use
      Is it possible in SuSE's 8.0 YAST2 to install new packages through FTP? In 7.3, you couldn't do this - YAST2 would only accept CD, NFS or a hard drive directory.
      --
      "The good die first." "Most of us are morally ambiguous, which explains our random dying patterns." --- MST3K
    2. Re:A lot of changes... by grahamm · · Score: 1

      If it is then I haven't managed to find it yet. Prior to release the SuSe people on the suse-e mailing list kept saying that the new "improved" Yast2 would make the need for Yast1 redundant, but I cannot see how to use Yast2 to (for example) install packages from the "supplementary" directories on ftp.suse.com, which could be done with Yast1.

    3. Re:A lot of changes... by StarTux · · Score: 1

      feedback@suse.com or feedback@suse.de is the place to send your comments...I have SuSE 8.0, the new yast has been improved, however I miss the ability to navigate and select which packages to install through yast1. I noticed an expert option on yast2 online update though that lets you select FTP, but have yet to figure it out as it seems to not work as I would expect.

    4. Re:A lot of changes... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      Never, ever do an update. I've never, ever had one go well. SuSE especially. Do like Packard Bell tech support always recommended. . . format & reinstall, and avoid problems.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    5. Re:A lot of changes... by sconest · · Score: 2

      YAST has gone, just YAST2 is left (as text and as X version). BTW: The text version is awfull to use

      And gone am I as a SuSE user.
      YAST1 had that KISS touch that YAST2 has not.

      --
      Guvf vf abg n EBG zrffntr
    6. Re:A lot of changes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      format & reinstall, and avoid problems. Or preferably, always have a partition or two empty to install new version there, and have the old one on different one so when something still goes wrong you can either go back to old version or access old stuff. Just like witb backup tapes, juggling the partitions (ie. reuse old one for next upgrade) allows you to have reasonably good old backups while not using too many spare partitions.

  27. Re:What are the advantages of Suse over RH, Mandra by pubjames · · Score: 2, Funny


    The basic differences are:

    Suse is by fat, sausage scoffing crauts.
    Mandrake is by irritating, garlic loving frogs.
    Red Hat is by noisy, burger munching Yankees.

    Take your pick.

  28. Mandrake 8.2 also shipping... by joestar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They announced it yesterday - it includes StarOffice 6.0 for ProSuite & PowerPack Editions. The announce is here.

    Does SuSE 8.0 include StarOffice 6.0 as well?

    1. Re:Mandrake 8.2 also shipping... by software_non_olet · · Score: 1

      Does SuSE 8.0 include StarOffice 6.0 as well?

      Yes, if you buy the discs (an update is sufficient). SO is never downloadable AFAIK.

    2. Re:Mandrake 8.2 also shipping... by software_non_olet · · Score: 1

      Does SuSE 8.0 include StarOffice 6.0 as well?

      Ooops, sorry, if didn't switch the brain on before reading your posting.

      No, it's StarOffice 5.2

    3. Re:Mandrake 8.2 also shipping... by oever · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, still StarOffice 5.2.
      Source: The SuSE 8.0 Professional box on my desk.

      --
      DNA is the ultimate spaghetti code.
    4. Re:Mandrake 8.2 also shipping... by NuMessiah · · Score: 2, Interesting

      SuSe 8.0 comes with StarrOffice 5.2 :(.

      Too bad that they were unable to strike a deal like Mandrake did with Sun. SO 6.0 would be a very good addition to KDE 3.0 and stuff.

      Odd thing is that SuSe usually has a very good connections to other companies (read: SuSe Linux Database Server = IBM DB2 UDB + distro, SuSe Groupware Server = Lotus Domino + distro, SuSe Certified Oracle 9i ...).

      bb4now,
      PMC

      --
      we-go-we-fly
    5. Re:Mandrake 8.2 also shipping... by CynicTheHedgehog · · Score: 2

      Why aren't any distros including OpenOffice? In my opinion it's a vast improvement over StarOffice 5.2, and the differences between it and StarOffice 6.0 are trivial.

    6. Re:Mandrake 8.2 also shipping... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The download version of Mandrake 8.2 includes Open Office 641c, as I recall.

    7. Re:Mandrake 8.2 also shipping... by PlaysWithMatches · · Score: 2

      Does SuSE 8.0 include StarOffice 6.0 as well?

      According to another poster on here, it comes with StarOffice 5.2.

      --

      Mozilla's a nice operating system, but it needs a better browser.
    8. Re:Mandrake 8.2 also shipping... by mr3038 · · Score: 2

      Why aren't any distros including OpenOffice?

      The three CDs freely downloadable version of Mandrake 8.2 includes OpenOffice.org office suite. Default fonts look butt-ugly though. As the downmodded anonymous coward said, it's version 641. Suite contains:

      • OpenOffice.org Writer
      • OpenOffice.org Math
      • OpenOffice.org Draw
      • OpenOffice.org Calc
      • OpenOffice.org Impress

      Equivalent parts for KOffice are included too. A MS word document I tried opened fine in OpenOffice.org Writer but didn't look quite right with KWord.

      --
      _________________________
      Spelling and grammar mistakes left as an exercise for the reader.
  29. First distro with KDE3? Nope. by rmstar · · Score: 2, Informative

    This must be the first distro shipping KDE3, or am I mistaken?

    If you take the word "shipping" literally, maybe.

    But I've been using KDE3 for a while on my laptop, running Gentoo 1.1, which, btw, is the best distro I've ever tried.

    rmstar

    1. Re:First distro with KDE3? Nope. by salsashrk · · Score: 1

      Yep, I've been running KDE3 quite happily on my Gentoo box for about a week and a half now. Very sweet.

      --
      ..cage goes into salsa. Shark's in the salsa. Our shark.
    2. Re:First distro with KDE3? Nope. by questforme · · Score: 1

      I've been using Gentoo for about 4 weeks now and I'm inclined to agree with you.

  30. Suse/bloated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What's better?

    (a) a SuSE Linux project

    or

    (b) sex with a mare

  31. Version numbers by prefect42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's amazing how fast the numbers go up in distributions compared to that of the packages within...

    Maybe companies should be forced to number their distros based on the average version number of the packages within; that'd cause an interesting non-linear numbering scheme. ;)

    jh

    --

    jh

    1. Re:Version numbers by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming you were joking, but I'll respond just for the hell of it because I have free time. yay.

      Maybe the package numbers go up quick because you don't have to have an upgrade to all the package components to get a package upgrade. If 1/3 of the packages components were upgraded you would very easily get a version number upgrade.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    2. Re:Version numbers by Build6 · · Score: 1

      somebody mod this up!!!

    3. Re:Version numbers by yukonbob · · Score: 1

      Maybe companies should be forced to number their distros based on the average version number of the packages within

      Maybe they support a few modern versions of EMACS... hell, maybe _every_ version.

      -yb

    4. Re:Version numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the fuck cares?
      God I wish there was a mod pt for moron.
      Who cares if they said its Suse 3242342423.93?!
      You think this somehow effects the quality of the distro?

      Gee and you wonder why people don't take the linux community seriously. People arguing about version numbers, which desktop to use, fonts, etc.
      Just get your work done and STFU.

  32. Lycoris... by bleckywelcky · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Any affiliation with MS? Just wondering, cause I saw this at the bottom:

    Lycoris and Desktop/LX are Trademarks of Redmond Linux Corp. © 2001, 2002 Lycoris All Rights Reserved

    1. Re:Lycoris... by mrscorpio · · Score: 1

      Just because they're perhaps located in Redmond, WA, doesn't mean they're affiliated with MS!

      There's lots of tech companies in Redmond, WA.

      Chris

    2. Re:Lycoris... by MsGeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Lycoris is also designed to look and feel more like Windows XP than any other distro. The real purpose of Lycoris seems to be to provide a distro with "training wheels" for Microsoft refugees. As such, it occupies a very unique and very needed niche in Linux-land.

      I have an order in for Lycoris Desktop Developer edition, (Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers!) and I will probably comment on my experiences with the distro in my column at Low End PC as soon as I get some time with it.

      I think it's hilarious that these guys are based in Redmond. I don't think that MS is quaking in their boots just yet, but if this is what the Lycoris site claims, they might have reason to in the future.

      Oh yeah, just so I correct a mistake I made about this distro in the past...it is based on Caldera, not Corel/Debian.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    3. Re:Lycoris... by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1


      I wasn't really trying to affiliate them with MS. It was just something that we could sortof have a chuckle at. It's not outrageously funny that they're located in Redmond, just kinda humorous.

    4. Re:Lycoris... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like how a Linux distro can completely copy the visual style of Windows XP with impunity, while no doubt if Microsoft did a similar thing, they would be chastised beyond comprehension.

  33. This should be good... by CrazyBusError · · Score: 1

    Looking forward to getting this - currently have 7.3 installed and apart from a few minor niggles it's been superb. Only problem I ever had was that it could never install the AC97 on-board sound on my ECS-SIS motherboard. Definitely looking forward to KDE 3 though...

    I wonder how many CD's this one will arrive on...

    --
    -Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience-
    1. Re:This should be good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ac 97 is crap. There was driver code for the
      i810 chipset that should work with it, but it never quite did.
      Needless to say, had the same problem.

  34. Re:What are the advantages of Suse over RH, Mandra by larien · · Score: 2, Funny
    *laugh* however, quick speeling flame: it's usually 'krauts', not 'crauts', after sauerkraut. Yes, we name a country's residents after.. a type of cabbage.

    Still I'm not sure if that's worse or better than frogs, wops or dagoes (French, Italian and Spanish respectively, but not respectfully).

  35. Linux math. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny


    > The increase from 7.3 to 8.0 is due to the inclusion of KDE 3.0, a SuSE-modified kernel version 2.4.18...among other packages that have been upgraded or added.

    7.3 + 3.0 + 2.4.18 = 8.0 ???

    Maybe some of those other packages had negative version numbers.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:Linux math. by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2

      the Binay compatability changed so they madea new release.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    2. Re:Linux math. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The court ruled it legal to fuck the voters by running out the clock, and demonstrated how to do it.

      Seems that their math is as good as your legal knowledge, judging by your sig.

    3. Re:Linux math. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too much math makes you really looney.

    4. Re:Linux math. by uglyduckling · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it's done in log space, so that all those pre 1.0 packages become -ve numbers?

    5. Re:Linux math. by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      Linux distros have the most impressive version number bloat I've ever seen. Having a high version number looks better because your product looks more mature to new users.

      I used to think that SuSE and Mandrake did it to stay one step ahead of RH. RH's numbering scheme is fairly sane these days, although I'm not so sure about the move from 6 to 7....

    6. Re:Linux math. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The court ruled it legal to fuck the voters by running out the clock, and demonstrated how to do it.

      Cool, not only are you not funny, you're a fucking moron, too. Good job, your parents must be proud.

    7. Re:Linux math. by 56ker · · Score: 2

      What's Binay compatibility?

    8. Re:Linux math. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok fine so I kan't spel, so wat.

  36. Red Hat update *IS* free by salimma · · Score: 3, Informative

    Updates are available via FTP servers for free, and through their Red Hat Network channels it's free for the end user (1 free token per user account).

    So what you're paying for is to be able to manage all your computers through one interface. SuSE's YOU last time I tried it (7.3) works like Ximian's Red Carpet, or Microsoft's Windows Update, in that all the work is done on the client's side.

    Michel

    --
    Michel
    Fedora Project Contribut
  37. Been Shipping for a couple of weeks already! by 4im · · Score: 5, Informative

    See subject - SuSE 8.0 has been shipping for a while, I've been seeing comments about it in german and swiss newsgroups. These comments range from rather critical to absolutely enthusiastic.

    Unfortunately, it's been "in" for a while to bash the "Windows from Nürnberg". IMHO SuSE is very easy to setup for newbies and gurus alike (no time to waste on configuring stuff, leaving time for tinkering on the non-obvious things) and gives you all the power of linux in a nice package.

    Can't wait to get my hands on this new version, the features list is quite impressive. I'll get around to it this weekend, probably...

    (using SuSE, Debian, RedHat, IPCop, ... on x86, UltraSparc, Alpha)

    1. Re:Been Shipping for a couple of weeks already! by JabberWokky · · Score: 4, Interesting
      SuSE is very easy to setup for newbies and gurus alike (no time to waste on configuring stuff, leaving time for tinkering on the non-obvious things) and gives you all the power of linux in a nice package.

      Amen - I want to develop the software I get paid for or I want to play with, and I want to have my servers working rock solid without devoting myself 24/7 to them. SuSE offers a very solid base, incredibly logically laid out system, very stable releases (I'm even trusting the x,0 release here), and not only fast security updates, but software version updates for quite a bit of software, even for releases several minor version old.

      It allows me to get my work done, and provides a nice CLI, GUI and "install and ignore" server experience. Plus, if you're doing enterprise work, check out their more powerful packages (the ones that start at $1000 and move on up). They provide the packages for IBM's enterprise applications, not to mention the Linux for IBM's big iron. Simply having a team that can provide the necessary QA and support to big customers makes me feel confidant as a minor customer of theirs.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    2. Re:Been Shipping for a couple of weeks already! by evilviper · · Score: 2

      No, as a matter of fact it hasn't been shipping for weeks.

      There have been 'beta' releases redily available, but the release is very recent.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Been Shipping for a couple of weeks already! by 4im · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, as a matter of fact it hasn't been shipping for weeks.

      There have been 'beta' releases redily available, but the release is very recent.

      I am aware of the betas, and _yes_ the _official_ release _has_ been out for a while. True, not everywhere at the same time, but my first notice that it was out was from a _MediaMarkt_ in Switzerland, of all places... been out _at least_ for 1 1/2 weeks. And no, it hasn't arrived yet at the place where I usually pick it up, so the distribution definitely isn't uniform around Europe.

    4. Re:Been Shipping for a couple of weeks already! by Zemran · · Score: 1

      It is great to read someone whose arrogance exceeds their intelligence... I noticed that SuSE 8.0 was out in Germany weeks ago (real version, not beta) and it came out in the UK last week.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
  38. Already in shops here in .de by NuMessiah · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well, it's technically a *week* late. I had my copy of SuSe 8.0 Personal Package in the mailbox (Germany) already at Friday the 12th. (Preordered directly from SuSe.de web site).

    Just one comment: Installation went flawlessly on the Gericom Webgine 1630 Notebook. All of the hardware (expect AMR Modem) automatically recognized and initialized :).

    bb4now,
    PMC

    --
    we-go-we-fly
  39. RedHat to Suse by joe_fish · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I'm using RedHat 7.2 right now, but it isn't very stable - Galeon occasionally locks everything up solid. So I need a way out.

    I was hoping to wait for RH7.3, but perhaps this is a better option.

    My real question is how hard will I have to work to move accross all my configs? There's samba/printers/sendmail/etc/etc. Anyone know of a good way of doing RH->Suse without any pain?

    1. Re:RedHat to Suse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm using RedHat 7.2 right now, but it isn't very stable - Galeon occasionally locks everything up solid. So I need a way out.
      I thought that the way out was already found.

    2. Re:RedHat to Suse by StarTux · · Score: 1

      Go to the SuSE suppiort page and sign up for the excellent mailing list there. Also search the databse for answers.

    3. Re:RedHat to Suse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol redhat isn't stable because Galeon locks up!Lol. Yea of course its redhat and not galeon. It's a sad day when a linux distro is considered unstable because of a third party web browser. If you want stability use KDE. If you really want to use linux as a desktop use Lycoris.

  40. Re:What are the advantages of Suse over RH, Mandra by pubjames · · Score: 2


    Actually I regret posting this now. I have a lot of respect for the Germans and the Americans. ;-)

  41. I've got the ISO's by NighthawkFoo · · Score: 1

    That's not completely true...they don't provide ISO's to the general public. I've been running SuSE 8.0 for about two weeks now, after downloading the ISO's from our internal Linux mirror network. I guess the only reason that they make the ISO's available to us is that we are a partner with them.

    I've been pretty impressed, but the kicker in KDE3.0 was giving me problems for a week or so. It seems to have calmed down now, but I don't know why. Kdeinit was taking up 90% of the CPU and the kicker would stop responding to events.

    By the way, Yast is now gone - Yast2 has replaced it, both in the GUI and console. It's pretty good, albeit somewhat slow to load its modules.

    I've previously bought versions of SuSE, so I don't feel bad about burning this one. I tend to get the whole boxed set about once every major release.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
    - Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    1. Re:I've got the ISO's by grahamm · · Score: 1

      I am seeing the same problem, with kdeinit taking all the CPU, with the released 8.0. So, I decided to use Gnome instead.

    2. Re:I've got the ISO's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I decided to use Gnome instead

      And this is helping your CPU usage how, exactly ?

    3. Re:I've got the ISO's by grahamm · · Score: 1

      When Kdeinit was using all the CPU, everything else ran so slowly that it took about 5min to switch betweeen X and a text-mode screen. Also it slowed the X applications. Running Gnome, everything is responsive and the processor idle time is more reasonable.

    4. Re:I've got the ISO's by NighthawkFoo · · Score: 1

      Come to think of it, kdeinit might have calmed down since I did an update through Yast2. I think one of the packages was kdebase, which probably fixed the issue I was having.

      Now if only it would detect my USB Intellimouse Optical on every boot...

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
      - Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  42. Mandrake too by Salsaman · · Score: 1
    There are also rpms for Mandrake. The upgrade (kde 2->3) worked almost flawlessly for me.

    (I had to add /usr/lib/kde3 to my ld.so.conf and also add /opt/kde3/bin to my path).

  43. SuSE is not free by babychess · · Score: 0, Troll

    Yast, the SuSE installation program is not free, and does not comply to the Open Source definition. Remember that when choosing between SuSE and other distros.

    1. Re:SuSE is not free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly, i will never support a distro using free GNU software, and then expecting people to pay them(without a download option)! Sounds like MS, only they don't write the software.

    2. Re:SuSE is not free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has an ftp install option, you whiny little fuck. 'oh, it's not pure open source, wahhhh!' why don't you get a fucking clue, you asshole. oh my god, a business wants you to PAY them for their goods. remember the simpson's quote "money can be exchanged for goods and services'? fucking idiot, go back to fucking your brother or whatever.

    3. Re:SuSE is not free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      IMNSHO, two questions should be answered before responding to the parent post: first, must all software in a Linux distro be free or open-source, and second, is free and/or open-source software morally superior to non-free and/or closed-source software? I would answer "not necessarily" to both.

      Legally speaking, as long as no licenses are violated, SuSE can do whatever it wants. Technically speaking, I do think that SuSE should at least make YaST's source code available; after all, there may be some excellent ideas there that we can all profit from. Nonetheless, I don't think we should count it as a strike against them that YaST is closed-source.

      I agree with "use the best tool for the job, preferring open-source and/or free software when possible," so if SuSE happens to be the best tool, I will use it. If not, I won't.

    4. Re:SuSE is not free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why it is necessary, when disagreeing with someone, to add a few personal attacks and lace one's disagreement with profanity? Why can we not simply disagree politely?

    5. Re:SuSE is not free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The source code of YaST is available since ages.

    6. Re:SuSE is not free by MobyTurbo · · Score: 1
      Legally speaking, as long as no licenses are violated, SuSE can do whatever it wants. Technically speaking, I do think that SuSE should at least make YaST's source code available; after all, there may be some excellent ideas there that we can all profit from. Nonetheless, I don't think we should count it as a strike against them that YaST is closed-source.
      I don't know why I'm responding to this troll topic, but here goes. Actually, YaST's source code *is* available, right on the CDs. The only thing is you can't use YaST for your own profit, even for cost of media, only SuSE can do that. Therefore it's not open sources.
    7. Re:SuSE is not free by Zemran · · Score: 1

      I find that easy to remember when I go out and buy SuSE because I find it to be the best and easiest to use distro.

      You are welcome to stick to your religous beliefs but I use Linux because it is better, not because it is free or open. I have tried the free .isos and have gone back to SuSE. I have tried the open and feel I do not mind paying for the improvements as well. I pay for good games as well.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
  44. Using it since 14 days / kernel problems by tjansen · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am using it since 14 days now (live in Germany and subscribed it). It's ok, not many noticable improvements over 7.3 beside KDE 3.0. But what really annoys me is that the kernel is not very stable, at least for some activities. When trying to rip a CD my system freezes after a few minutes. I ripped several dozen CDs with 7.3 without a single problem. Another good way to crash the kernel is to listen to audio using an USB audio device. Sometimes it crashes after 5 minutes, sometimes after 60 minutes, but it will always crash. Since 7.3's had a bug that prevented USB audio from working it's still an improvement, but not a very good one. Playing Tribes 2 with the Nvidia drivers is better, it only crashes after several hours, and I had the same problems with Suse 7.3 as well, at least after the last driver update.

    1. Re:Using it since 14 days / kernel problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      from what it sounds like, I'd guess you're looking at a hardware problem from all those crashes. Possibly overheating, or more likely a bad power supply, but it's definately not normal for a linux system to crash like that on it's own. Try it on a different machine and see what happens

  45. SuSE 8.0 (Mis) Information by salsashrk · · Score: 1

    Security updates for RedHat boxen has never been a problem. Just an binary FTP away..

    We even went so far as to install the apt package for our servers so we could always have the latest packages a la debian. Sure, I can see how it's not really *free* to su - and then apt-get dist-upgrade if you mean the man hours for me to type two lines...

    Unless the bitch is about the kernel install, but how hard is it to download the rpm and type: rpm -ivh kernel-2.4.whatever.rpm?
    I choose not to use the prepacked kernels, but for the lazy, it's hell of a *free* way to go!

    --
    ..cage goes into salsa. Shark's in the salsa. Our shark.
  46. Re:What are the advantages of Suse over RH, Mandra by NorthDude · · Score: 0

    When I bough SuSE 7.1, I got a nice pin and some sticker. That's a big plus, the pin is really nice on my 3 foot tall Tux! :)

    --


    I'd rather be sailing...
  47. Inquiring Minds Want to Know by fm6 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    When I tried SuSE a couple of years ago, the thing that seemed to set it apart was its ambitious attempt to rework system configuration. Instead of hacking the usual array of scripts and config files, the SuSE admin was supposed to set a large set of parameters contained in a single file.

    Thing is, I could never get these parameters set exactly right. It was always tempting to bypass this procedure and configure the system the old-fashioned way.

    So here's my question: does SuSE still do things this way? And if so, do people really use these parameters, or do they just blow it off and edit the scripts?

    1. Re:Inquiring Minds Want to Know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's easy to use the rc variables in your scripts.
      Most of the time I use them.
      It's nice to have the option of integrating things tightly that way. Yast works fine with
      these edited additions.

      I've heard a rumor that yast is gone in 8.0.
      Another rumor says that rc.config is gone.
      rc.config was very convenient.
      Yast2 was still alpha in 7.2/7.3.
      If yast and rc.config are gone, I will
      have to start over again, and it won't be
      with SuSE.

    2. Re:Inquiring Minds Want to Know by Telex4 · · Score: 1

      It still tries to keep most of your system configuration, including network configuration, in the one file, which you can still override if you like. Most of the options are then set in the various YaST2 modules, which are pretty logically laid out, which makes configuring things like your network easy for a newbie (well, so long as you know the meaning of DHCP etc ;-) and it's powerful enough for the more expeienced admin.

      From YaST2 you also can access a module called the RcConfig Editor (original huh?) which gives you a really nice tree-structured list of all the parameters you can switch manually, which acts rather like a restructured /etc tree for the parameters it keeps, so you can have complete control and not have to spend ages using locate+grep+vi to find the settings you want to change.

      As you might guess, I tend to use the various YaST modules, mainly because I just use my computer for simple desktop stuff like browsing, emailing and perl programming so I don't need to really fine-tune the system. But I'm sure if you wanted to you could.

      The only thing that's annoyed me in the 6 months or so that I've used SuSE 7.2 and 7.3 is having to use RPMs all the time to be able to use them at all (otherwise the rpm db screws up and moans about dependencies) which you kinda have to do with a lot of stuff to be able to use YOU (the online update program, really, really useful).

    3. Re:Inquiring Minds Want to Know by MobyTurbo · · Score: 1
      When I tried SuSE a couple of years ago, the thing that seemed to set it apart was its ambitious attempt to rework system configuration. Instead of hacking the usual array of scripts and config files, the SuSE admin was supposed to set a large set of parameters contained in a single file.
      Thanks to SuSE's commitment to the LSB (Linux standards base) rc.config has been split into several smaller files residing in a directory (/etc/sysconfig or something) in accordance with the new specs. I actually like rc.config so I'm not sure if this is an improvement.
    4. Re:Inquiring Minds Want to Know by fm6 · · Score: 2
      It still tries to keep most of your system configuration, including network configuration, in the one file, which you can still override if you like.
      Well, that's fine, if you're a basic download-the-iso-and-hack-away user. But if you're actually buying support from SuSE, you can't bypass the SuSE config system. Or at least you couldn't when I was a SuSE user.
  48. Re:8.0 should have 2.5 by boltar · · Score: 0, Troll

    "Stable" has a rather fluid definition when applied to the 2.4 series. If you want real
    stability stick to 2.2 , forget about 2.4 (its a lemon IMO) and wait for 2.6 to arrive.

  49. Came on time for most people, for others it was ea by StarTux · · Score: 2

    Recieved my copy yesterday, the 22nd. Precisely on time. Like Lord of the Rings, people in Europe have been getting theirs before the US.

    StarTux

  50. Bloated? by ShawnMcCool42 · · Score: 1

    People complaining about bloat need to take more responsibility. You can choose what to install. If you want to do a full install, fine, if not fine.. Just don't complain when all the options are presented to you in such easily configured ways.

    1. Re:Bloated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. a voice of reason.

      If a user just stepped off the Micro$tanic
      suse holds their hand through the install.

      If you know what you are doing, you can install
      as little as you want. NO YAST2, no SuSEconfig
      just you and a command line..

  51. Kernel by tsa · · Score: 1

    What about this new kernel 2.4.x I keep hearing about? I still run 2.2.13. Do you think I should upgrade?

    --

    -- Cheers!

    1. Re:Kernel by laserjet · · Score: 2

      yes.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    2. Re:Kernel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should *at least* upgrade to 2.2.19. There are some serious security flaws in the earlier kernels.

      Apart from that, you only need to upgrade when you feel you should

    3. Re:Kernel by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1
      You should *at least* upgrade to 2.2.19. There are some serious security flaws in the earlier kernels.


      Actually, I believe 2.2.19 also has security flaws. 2.2.20 is the "latest and greatest".
      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  52. Another couple of reasons its version 8.0 by StarTux · · Score: 2

    The start variables in rc.config are no longer needed, as they now match run levels much more closely (basically they are deprecating rc.config). You will find individual scripts under /etc/sysconfig.

    Also noticed a SuSe hardware boot time hardware detection utility, similer to that of Redhat's.

    Gnome 1.4.1 is included too.

    Promise IDE Raid controllers are fully supported.

    1. Re:Another couple of reasons its version 8.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does this include the on-board Promise controler (Fast Track lite 100 or whatever it's called).

      Mike

    2. Re:Another couple of reasons its version 8.0 by StarTux · · Score: 2

      Straight from the update manual:

      "The hard disk controller manufactured by Promise is currently found on high-end motherboards in numerous computer models, either as a [pure IDE controller (for UDMA 100) or as an IDE-RAID controller. As of SuSE Linux 8.0, these controllers are directly supported by the kernel and treated as a standard controller for IDE hard disks. The additonal kernel module pdcraid is reuired before you can acquire RAID functionality".

      Guess there is you answer :).

      StarTux

  53. About the Update from 7.3 to 8.0 by ksschen · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've been updating my SuSE 7.3 to 8.0 10 days ago. The update changed some settings, for example it activated netsettings received by a DHCP-Server. I did not use a DHCP-Server before. But when I switched off the DHCP-Option, it showed all the previous Network-Settings - except the own local IP-Adress. Some Links in the kicker did not work anymore. Worst is that Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 does not work anymore. When trying to run it tells me, that it does not find the configuration database anymore. I had no time to fix that (to be more exact: I don't know anymore when I will have time to try to fix that, because Evolution is my PIM (-: ). During the Update I had a good feeling, because the update routine asked for every single file I expected it to ask for, because I did not install them via YAST2. The update is not reversible. Some other small things are broken, too. The KDE-Start-Menu was in german before the update and is now in English, for example. Mozilla 0.9.8 crashes very, very often and often crashes while booting, when it crashed before, till the X-Server is restarted. Before the update Mozilla 0.9.8 crashed maybe once a week. When installing the available Patches it did not find a patch (menu_fix-1) it recommended for update. But on the other side, there are no hardware problems, KDE 3 runs really fast and I feel some performance improvements. YAST2 is better than before, but I miss some features from YAST1 (which is not available anymore) or did not find them till now. I also installed SuSE 8.0 on a new machine and that worked absolutely great - all modern hardware was recognized and worked. Simply worked, without additional drivers as necesary in Windows XP in the same configuration. I was very impressed by that. Bye Kuesschen

    1. Re:About the Update from 7.3 to 8.0 by frankmu · · Score: 1

      i had a similar problem with evolution.. i ended up using the bonobo-conf file from http://www.usr-local-bin.org/ it worked for me.

      --
      Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
    2. Re:About the Update from 7.3 to 8.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well woodeedoo. I've installed XP on several machines and have never needed drivers since all the manus work with MS to give a great out of box experience.
      If you want anyone to take you seriously you'll have to stop making ridicules statements like that.
      Linux desktop=win 3.51 in many respects. I still run one, but I also don't try to pretend something its not.

  54. Re:What are the advantages of Suse over RH, Mandra by baldass_newbie · · Score: 1

    quick speeling flame

    Doesn't look like you should be giving speeling flames.

    Regards.

    --
    The opposite of progress is congress
  55. update to 8 by filbert009 · · Score: 1

    am looking for a suitable candidate to get into my sparc box. cant get the update yet (ho hum) back to apt getting from woody will try back later

  56. "Late" by V1m+Fuego · · Score: 0

    It wasn't late - there were a dozen copies at my local Borders (Although only the full professional edition, not the update or personal)

  57. Well, it's technically a day late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, according to UPS, mine shipped 3 days ago.

  58. like a Mercedes-Benz (not always good) by chrestomanci · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am a SuSE user. I chose it over other distros, because I read a number of favourable reviews. One memorably refereed to it as "The Mercedes-Benz of Linux Distros".

    I would say this is correct, but not necessary in a good way.

    Like the car, It works very well when new, but anyone who tries to tweak of modify anything is liable to break it.

    I have concluded that this would probably make a good distro for my Dad, who just wants a reliable set-up, and won't try to install the latest hot thing of the net, but for myself, I intend to switch to a more hacker friendly distro, probably Debian.

  59. Re:What are the advantages of Suse over RH, Mandra by larien · · Score: 1

    *whoosh* That was the sound of the joke going straight over your head...

  60. Here you have the isos by s2r · · Score: 0

    I hope you have edonkey installed. GET IT!

  61. They still do it this way.... by Alethes · · Score: 1

    This is the one thing that really irritates me about SuSE. I love it otherwise. Strange thing is, SuSE ranked very well according to this Linux Standards Base test. I don't know related it is, but it's being touted as SuSE's commitment to standards. I would guess that the system configuration is related to the way YAST is set up.

  62. why SuSE? by BenjyD · · Score: 1

    Having had SuSE 7.3 installed on two of my own boxes and several of my friends', I have to say - Why use SuSE?

    If you're not a complete beginner at Linux then the configuration system is pretty nasty. I've observed stability problems with one desktop machine and a mail server that resulted in hard reach-for-reset-switch lockups. The package and update system in Yast is slow and clunky.

    I have since switched to mostly using Debian and it's so much better I didn't believe it to start with. A good configuration system, stable, incredible package and update system. And it's completely free (as in beer and speech).

  63. it already is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:it already is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ueber-danks for the URL :-)

  64. Re:8.0 should have 2.5 by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    2.4 has been doing better since Linus passed it to Marcello. 2.4.17 & 18 seem stable enough.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  65. Re:What are the advantages of Suse over RH, Mandra by Karza · · Score: 1

    Red Hat is by noisy, burger munching Yankees.

    I beg to differ! Red Hat is located in North Carolina which is BELOW the Mason-Dixion line. Dem's ain't yankees! ;)

    --
    --I don't mind the school of hard knocks, it's those darned refresher courses I hate. =)
  66. Re:What are the advantages of Suse over RH, Mandra by DiCkE · · Score: 1

    I would say their way of integrating KDE into the distro and the quick releases of updates to KDE and KDE applications. And the superb service when it comes to getting stability to the packages!

    The installation is also by far the best with yast2 it's plain and simple and an upgrade is also easy.

    I would say that as a SuSE user you can forget the distro tweaking and concentrate on your work;)

  67. Shipping or Available for DL? by TexTex · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's great that Suse's finished work on 8.0 and will sell me it for $40-80...but are they putting it on ftp sites yet for download in the spirit of Linux distros?

    I've always had a bit of a pain downloading 7.3 and it'd be great if they included some .iso files with 8.0 to make a truly easy install.

    --
    -Barkeep, a draft of your most hazardous brew, for the world is slowly stepping into focus, and I don't like what I see.
    1. Re:Shipping or Available for DL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, SuSE doesn't do ISOs for the installable distro anymore (they do an ISO only for an evaluation CD that you don't want). Their business model is to grow units shipment, not to expand the userbase through downloads.

      You can install from ftp if you like. Based on past history, you'll find 8.0 for ftp installation in about a month's time. And unless you're a (cheap) company planning on installing many seats, don't mirror the whole distro tree. A typical installation will suck down maybe 500 MB whereas the entire distro is many GB. Downloading it all is a complete waste of time and bandwidth.

  68. Do a clean install by anno1602 · · Score: 1

    Updating seems to be a bad idea with SuSE 8.0. We've had a lot of trouble with updated machines, once we did a clean install, keeping only the /home partitions and reformatting everything else, it ran very smoothly (you *do* have your $HOME in a separate partition, right?).

    Somewhat annoying is that there seems to be no clean way to do the move from the old, pre-8 config scheme to the new one. Update doesn't work, and I haven't found any scripts that would automate it any other way. So we had to reconfigure everything (which was not as bad as it sounds, since our machines are largely identical).

    1. Re:Do a clean install by Gomer+Pyle · · Score: 1

      As a former Debian user, I hate not being able to do a painless upgrade of Suse 7.3. Give me a Linux distribution that's as user friendly as Suse with package management as easy and powerful as Debian. Maybe Xandros will be a step in the right direction.

    2. Re:Do a clean install by anno1602 · · Score: 1

      I agree with you that it is very inconvenbient, but I can assure you that (for what it's worth) it is an 8.0-specific problem. The drastic change in the configuration scheme seems to cause the problem. Personally I upgraded 7.0->7.1->7.2->7.3 w/out problems, and I heard from people who did 6.4->7.0 smoothly, too. So I hope that we can expect headache-free upgrades from now on.

      (Yes, I'ld love to apt-get upgrade. Yast Online Update doesn't cut it, at least not in the 7.x versions. Didn't check 8.0 yet.)

    3. Re:Do a clean install by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can apt-get SuSE 7.3 and 8.0. More information about it at apt4rpm.sf.net. You only need to install 2 rpms (libapt and apt) and tweak the sources.list file :))

  69. Awful problems installing 7.3 by Razor+Sex · · Score: 1

    I installed 7.3 a while ago, and I know it's supposed to be a super-easy installation, but I just don't see it. It took me several days to get it installed because it always crashes. It even crashed during the successful install, but it was able to pick it back up and keep going to the distance without crashing further. Don't get me wrong, I loved it once it was running, but it just took forever to install, even though it's an Athlon XP, etc. Funny thing, my friend borrowed my CD's and installed it flawlessly. I guess I just have bad luck with making my own computers.

    1. Re:Awful problems installing 7.3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had to try about 40 times to get it to install. I finally got an install that would boot and went in and fixed the proken packages. This looked at first like the DMA issues many people get, but I disabled DMA, and went with failsafe mobo settings for the install and it still did not work. This was also an XP box. It installed very smoothly on my Thinkpad T20.

      I'm glad (in a way) to hear someone else having the smae problems, because I'm sure SuSE support was sick of me.

      Mike

  70. Re:What are the advantages of Suse over RH, Mandra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Correct. Red Hat is by noisy, barbeque-scarfing, sweet-tea guzzling, RedMan-chewing, overall-wearing, hillbillies.

    Thank ya kindly. Ya'll.

  71. They don't do it any more by anno1602 · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's exactly what 8.0 changed. They now have several config files, one for every package. Hack away!

    1. Re:They don't do it any more by MobyTurbo · · Score: 3, Informative
      That's exactly what 8.0 changed. They now have several config files, one for every package. Hack away!
      The reason why they made the change is that the LSB spec says that this is the layout of the configuration files. SuSE is perhaps the most LSB complient distro; to some extent this is why there has been so much incompatability between Red Hat and SuSE packages. Red Hat sort of had followed their own standards. I say "had" because RH has announced that "by the end of this year" they'll be LSB complient.
  72. Cutting Edge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm all for grids and linux, but since when is incorporating someone else's product in a distro 'cutting edge'? That sounds like MicroSoft-talk!

  73. Apache-Tomcat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know which version of Tomcat is shipping with SUSE 8.0????

  74. SuSE is a really good server platform by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I use it on all my servers, you're probably right, Debian is the better tweakable linux.

    SuSE is really good for those of us that are starting because it comes with a NICELY documented book(s) explaining a lot of the basics and the medium difficulty stuff.

    They also usually have a tech in their IRC room who will answer questions for you.

    In the end I really like SuSE. It's done everything I've required and more. I usually use it as a server without a graphical front end, but even on my two workstations with the graphics, it installed nicely and didn't require me to know more than I need to know to use the systems. And one of them was a laptop.

    Two thumbs up!

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  75. jakarta-tomcat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which version is shipping with SUSE 8.0???

  76. "legitimate"? by Yam-Koo · · Score: 1

    Who standardizes what major version increments mean? You sound like you're looking for an arguement rather than insight.

  77. Re:What are the advantages of Suse over RH, Mandra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i think it was understood as a joke. i wouldn't worry about it.

  78. Mandrake or Suse ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a Windows power user but a relative newbie to Linux, which means I've installed a couple of distros and played around but can't hack away conf files or troubleshoot. I also want a nice GUI and a painless dual boot install.
    In the past I've used Suse 7.2 which impressed me a lot. Then I began reading about how great Mandrake was for a Linux desktop, and the fit and polish that went into 8.2. AFAICT, the only thing missing from 8.2 is KDE 3.
    From a lot of the posts here, I gather that upgrading to KDE 3 is best accomplished by getting the source and compiling yourself, something that I am not comfortable with.

    Would you guys recommend Suse or Mandrake as the way to go? Apart from the obvious 'try both' response, I'd like some insight or links to comparitive reviews.

    Thanks

    1. Re:Mandrake or Suse ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do yourself a favor and get XP. You can then get Office any enjoy full compatibilty. All of your hardware will be supported. And you can buy all the latest games. Its also a hell of a lot more stable than any linux desktop. Linux may make a stable server, but is got a ways to go as a desktop.
      I tried your route for like 2 years and all your doing is wasting your time. If you have time to screw around with linux, then you have too much time on your hands and should be doing something better like spending time with your significant other or pet.
      BTW in case your haven't figured it out yet linux=linux. Once you get it installed KDE and GNOME look the same everywhere. You have the occasional admin tool that stands out, but overall one desktop is the same as another.
      If your looking for more to play with you probably are searching to fill a void in your life. Do yourself a favor and don't let that be linux, there are much more worthy pursuits in life to attend to.
      BTW I'm not joking here.

  79. Re:why Debian? by Icephreak1 · · Score: 1

    Gentoo Linux. Further up the food chain yet.

  80. ISO availability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's quite a shame that SuSE doesn't provide ISO images on their ftp. I understand they are merely trying to make some money off of their efforts, but they're turning away a significant portion of their potential customer base.

    SuSE was my first experience with linux (i actually purchased it), and I would like to give it another shot, but there is no way I am going out to drop cash on the whole package without trying it. I would be delighted if they even released a minimal base install ISO for download, and I'm sure many other people would agree. If I could try out a base install of the new system I would gladly go out and buy all of the additional CD's for a complete system. Unfortunately this isn't the case.

  81. SuSE 8 by Pila · · Score: 1, Informative

    I'm writing from a SuSE 8. I brought yesterday a box of "SuSE 8.0 Professional"



    It's an awensome distro. SuSE did an incredible work from 7.3:

    • Installation is now far better and simpler than 7.3. Everything it's more rationale and you can install a complete system with a few mouse strokes
    • Now You can controll everything from yast2 which has completely replaced yast
    • KDE 3 is a joy for eyes! IMHO only Aqua looks better.
    • rc.config is splitted in many more file in directory /etc/sysconfig, easier...


    And many more.. gimme some time to discover everything... :-)



    Pila
    --
    ---Pila---
    1. Re:SuSE 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm writing from Windows XP, think anyone gives a fuck?

  82. SuSE without Qt is rational by 0x0d0a · · Score: 0, Troll

    Perhaps because QT is ass-slow and RAM-hungry compared to gtk, wasn't free for a long time, and is a freaking bloated single library (unlike gtk...if I want just glib, I just use glib...no reimplementation of the STL here).

    SuSE doesn't have anything particularly wrong with them (aside from being the only distro I know of not to actually allow downloading ISOs, and having a lower degree of compatibility with most third party packaged software from their lower market share), so as long as they stay in business, I could see people that started out with them sticking with them through inertia. SuSE isn't my favorite distro, but it isn't "bad". Qt is "bad".

    The whole neat thing about Linux is that you aren't constrained to use a distro as a black box in the way it was packaged -- season to taste. I think it's quite rational to want to remove Qt from SuSE.

  83. modified kernel version 2.4.18 (with Andre's VM) by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

    suse modified kernel version 2.4.18 (with Andre's VM)

    Ok, whats modified? Wheres the changelog? Is Andre's VM not included in 2.4.18?

    Currently I am using 2.4.19-pre7 with preempt-kernel-rml-2.4.19-pre7-1.patch. Im very happy, stable as hell, smooth desktop now. Really would like to know what Suse has modified.

  84. Re:What are the advantages of Suse over RH, Mandra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    barbecue-eatin' tobacco-spittin' whisky-drinkin' loudmouth rednecks!

  85. Re:Get the Whole Load (St George's Day) by Ella+the+Cat · · Score: 1

    Yes, once in a while you can see the European origins of this distribution, like in the A4 bias for default paper sizes, but generally they're pretty good about providing "en" language users a good interface.



    Aargh! Brain exploding. It's St George's Day so hello moderators. England - an island next to mainland Europe. Inhabitants speak English (OK, most of the time, I'm cool about that). Mostly metric and despite what some would say, mostly European. And on good terms with our friends across the Atlantic. Sigh.



  86. Re:Get the Whole Load (St George's Day) by Ella+the+Cat · · Score: 1

    Bum! England is situated on an island next to mainland Europe ... (please excuse jingoistic rush of blood to head, struggling to find national identity today (23rd) more tea vicar?)

  87. Re:What are the advantages of Suse over RH, Mandra by Isaac-Lew · · Score: 2
    Red Hat is by noisy, burger munching Yankees.

    Nope, Red Hat is by barbeque-munchin', Confederate flag-wavin', NASCAR-lovin' rednecks.

    You got the noisy part right tho :).

  88. kde 3.0? by sewagemaster · · Score: 1

    there are also experimental kde3.0 packages for debian. although not the stablest, it's there and easy to install. so dont feel left out.

    http://kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=146 4

  89. Re:What are the advantages of Suse over RH, Mandra by belroth · · Score: 1

    Et moi, j'aime les Francais aussi.

    --
    I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
  90. Re:Get the Whole Load metrically by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't we just switch over to metric like the
    rest of the planet?
    After several years of only metric I come home to
    these asinine measurements. Talk about a
    trade impediment.

  91. It became available in the UK last week... by Zemran · · Score: 1

    I ordered mine at www.suse.co.uk last week. Hasn't arrived yet though ;-(

    --
    I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
  92. Re:A lot of changes...whine cheese anyone?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give me a break. Really. Take 10 seconds and
    you will be using yast2 like a pro.
    Yast took some getting used to and so does yast2
    but the switchover is easy enough.

    Granted not a single software company
    understands the concept that constant change does
    NOT lead to steady improvement. Why can't
    they just fix the bugs in the product as it
    stands and leave the interface alone. Oh yeah
    they have to sell new books and new certs.
    silly me

  93. More than a day late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Technically, it's more than a day late. I placed my order when 8.0 was announced and as of Tue, 4/23 4:30pm my order shows as "backordered" on Suse's website.
    I WANT MY KDE 3 !!!! WEEP WEEP

  94. Re:What are the advantages of Suse over RH, Mandra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here in NC. We prefer the name TARHEELS.

  95. Re:Came on time for most people, for others it was by kikensei · · Score: 1

    I got my copy on Friday, the 19th, delivered to New York in the US. I've already been wooping it up with transgaming's WineX 2.0, on my geforce 4600 ti. The thing I miss most is the Yast1 package manager. Ag great ascii based menu tool that you could run at a CLI. I used it via ssh on server's all the time.

    Aside from the missing (and missed) Yast1, 8.0 is solid. I've had no issues, it comes with all the latest and greatest packages and online update is always a boon.

  96. new games? by ZeroVerteX · · Score: 1

    If it's got BZFlag built-in then it ROCKS!

    --
    If it can go wrong it wnetscape: Segmentation Fault, Core dumped
  97. Re:What are the advantages of Suse over RH, Mandra by Karza · · Score: 1

    I bet there are some boys at Duke University who would like to have a chat with you about that one. ;)

    --
    --I don't mind the school of hard knocks, it's those darned refresher courses I hate. =)
  98. G e n t o o L i n u x G e n t o o L i n u x by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    G e n t o o L i n u x
    www.gentoo.org

  99. Re:$lashdot meta discussion GONE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    omg noooo....the horror.....the horror
    and anyone would care because.....?
    unplug and get a life, geek

  100. SuSe and StarOffice... by smartfart · · Score: 1

    Suse 8.0 only has StarOffice 5.2, but it does include the latest OpenOffice build (the one that just came out).

  101. Re:What are the advantages of Suse over RH, Mandra by Captain+Smooth · · Score: 1

    And there are some people at UNC that would love to chat with them over a friendly game of football ;-)

    --


    The ability to monopolize an industry is insignificant, next to the power of the source.
  102. Re:What are the advantages of Suse over RH, Mandra by bill.sheehan · · Score: 2

    I'd have to go digging through my old CDs, but there was a RedHat release that had "Redneck" as an install language choice. It was a hoot!

  103. vs Mandrake 8.2 by Hyperfrog · · Score: 0

    Although my heart swells with pride as each new major Linux version is released, the instability of this converns me. Actually, it's the most unstable 'high-end' linux I've ever put on my test box.

    However, I haven't spent the time balancing, hacking away to solve problems etc etc. This is just a prelim comment. Has anyone else had initial system problems like this?

    PII 300, TNT1, 256MB ram, 20G Deskstar, Gigabyte board. Could just be me :) In fact, it probably is.

    --
    Move faster
  104. A couple of problems? by einhverfr · · Score: 2

    and it has a couple of problems. they still haven't fixed the memory resource allocator driver ide problem from 6.2.34. also, my pcmcia universal drive-part table is unsupported.

    Repeat after me. dot-zero releases are buggy Linux distros. The basic attitude (and perhaps justifiable) is that these releases are showcase distributions and the .1 releases really seam to be QA releases with a few new features.

    I remember 7.0 which handily would have metadata corruption with Raiserfs-- fixed in 7.1.

    Don't even get me started on Red Hat's or Conectiva's .0 releases.

    I will personally wait until 8.1 before upgrading.

    I only use dot-zero releases when I have little other choice.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    1. Re:A couple of problems? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Repeat after me. dot-zero releases are buggy Linux distros.
      Red Hat .0 releases are bleeding-edge garbage, but the same doesn't apply to SuSE at all.

      SuSE 7.0 was an excellent "point" release, and by the looks of things, 8.0 is a nice incremental update as well (with some key upgrades like KDE3 and revised system configuration). So don't be fooled by SuSE's .0 versioning. It isn't a sea change of difference as is the usual convention in software.

  105. Where is the Download Version? by Cold_Fusion09 · · Score: 1

    Juect checked out ftp.suse.com and i see that they have not uploaded 8.0 on there Servers. I was going to install 8.0 on my new Dell Inspiron 8200. I hope they upload it soon.

    --
    I am Pakistani And No! I do not own a 7/11! And my NAME is not Apu! --Zuhaib
  106. Re:What are the advantages of Suse over RH, Mandra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quand à moi, ce sont plus les françaises que j'aime bien (especially if they're well stacked -- oy, I'm such a pig (man, just realized that being a sexist Jew is not Kosher ;-)).

  107. Re:Came on time for most people, for others it was by StarTux · · Score: 2

    Miss it too, just wish I could update RPM's as quickly as one did with yast1.

    StarTux

  108. After years of SuSE... by Advocadus+Diaboli · · Score: 1
    ... I finally decided not to upgrade to SuSE 8.0 and so I'm actually having a very close look at Debian.

    Well, SuSE is a nice distribution for beginners and you get things done with it, but recently there were some issues that I didn't like at all.

    When upgrading my laboratory server from SuSE 7.0 to SuSE 7.2 I found out that there was no longer any support for Token Ring adapters included. So I had to go on the net and find the modules on my own.

    Usually you should wait a couple of weeks before doing the upgrade and in this weeks you should frequently have a look at SuSE's support database to see what "features" were found.

    Well, with SuSE 8.0 there is no doubt why here in Germany they are calling it "Windows from Nuremberg". Its just another collection of the latest software. Take a look at KDE 3.0, SuSE announced it when KDE 3.0 was still in beta status. Thinking of the production time of a lot of CDs I guess that the official distribution still contains a beta or maybe just a release candidtate. Well, maybe even the beta works fine. But I want first of all a stable system before I try out new features. And I don't want to have a hell of a job after upgrading because several things don't work anymore.

    So my choice is going towards Debian because this distribution seems to be quality driven instead of marketing driven.

  109. Re:Get the Whole Load metrically by mpe · · Score: 2

    Why don't we just switch over to metric like the rest of the planet?

    Assuming the the "we" equates to the US it's probably to do with the US like to doing things differently from the rest of the planet. An extreme case of NIH (Not Invented Here) syndrome.
    The US did actually sign the "Treaty of the metre", but since when did the US signing a treaty actually mean anything :)

  110. Re:What are the advantages of Suse over RH, Mandra by baldass_newbie · · Score: 1

    Apologies. Big time case of H.U.A.S. (Head Up Ass Syndrome) yesterday.

    --
    The opposite of progress is congress
  111. Gentoo!! (www.gentoo.org) by cies · · Score: 1

    -- will allways be first:
    cause they've got no shipping ;-)