Slashdot Mirror


Star Trek: Nemesis Trailer to Premiere Tonight

savagexp writes "Dark Horizons is reporting that the trailer for the next Star Trek movie will premiere tonight on Entertainment Tonight and via the official website tonight at 7:30 EST." Makes me wish I could stomach ET, or at least had some real bandwidth. Hopefully it'll get placed in front of some of the movies coming in the next few weeks (maybe MiB2?)

321 comments

  1. Hmm.. by ChrisMG999 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Maybe we'll get lucky and it'll be on apple's quicktime site. (http://www.apple.com/trailers/)

    1. Re:Hmm.. by Kwikymart · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or, maybe we will be even luckier and it wont even be released in quicktime at all!

      --

      Buying a Dell computer is equivalent to dropping the soap in a prison shower.
    2. Re:Hmm.. by koganuts · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Maybe we'll get lucky and it'll be on apple's quicktime site. (http://www.apple.com/trailers/)"

      Looks like it will: 'The "Star Trek: Nemesis' trailer will then launch online in conjunction with the official movie Web site. Both will go live at 7:30 p.m. PDT/10:30 p.m. EDT Wednesday, with the trailer in the QuickTime format (Courtesy of Apple -- please see link below [it just points to http://www.apple.com/quicktime/]). The trailer will be available in small, large and full-screen sizes (QuickTime Pro 5 required for full-screen viewing). Additional streaming formats will also be available soon. The movie Web site will be accessible via STARTREK.COM."

    3. Re:Hmm.. by quintessent · · Score: 2

      My thoughts exactly. QuickTime thinks it runs on my computer, but it doesn't. I hear everything as it plays, but nothing is displayed.

      QuickTime software sucks and hogs the processor and I don't like the nag screen.

      Ok. Now I can sleep again.

  2. Please no Quicktime! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want a nice .avi

    1. Re:Please no Quicktime! by Newtonian_p · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have a MPEG2 VOB file.

      --

      There are 2 kinds of people in this world: Those who write in decimal and those who don't

    2. Re:Please no Quicktime! by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      I work with computer graphics as a hobby, and I can tell you I _wish_ I could encode to Quicktime5 or 6. With the exception of the latest divx codecs, quicktime is the top codec out there.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    3. Re:Please no Quicktime! by DrVxD · · Score: 2, Funny

      Can't we just have a whole pile of jpegs and flick through them by hand?

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    4. Re:Please no Quicktime! by Alex+Thorpe · · Score: 1

      No .avi files please; I haven't seen an .avi file that worked on my Mac since at least the mid-90's. I'll take QuickTime, especially if it's MPEG4.

      --
      "Common Sense Ain't" -Unknown
    5. Re:Please no Quicktime! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I haven't seen an .avi file that worked on my Mac since at least the mid-90's."

      No big surprise. I guess Apple is trying to crush the competition with their "monopolistic practices."

    6. Re:Please no Quicktime! by Alex+Thorpe · · Score: 1

      Apple's practices? I'd always heard it was because Intel owned the newer AVI codexes, and wouldn't license them to Apple. Though that's rather old info and may no longer be the case, I still can't get video on any AVI I download nowadays, just sound.

      --
      "Common Sense Ain't" -Unknown
    7. Re:Please no Quicktime! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intel? More like Microsoft. They consider AVI a depricated format, so WMP/Mac doesn't play them.

      If you are talking Divx AVIs, get the player from their site.

  3. Dang! I was hoping for a StarWars vs Startrek mooV by fishlet · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess I'll have to wait a while longer.
    Scene:

    Picard: Fire photon torpedo's
    Yoda: Diverts torpedo's with a wave of his paw.

  4. Not really a premier... by JonWan · · Score: 4, Informative

    The public premier was last weekend in Tulsa at the Sci-Fi Con. I've got a 3" DVD of it that was given away at Tulsa.

    1. Re:Not really a premier... by jonfromspace · · Score: 5, Funny

      So rip it and post it dude... Man... I have to think of everything...

      --
      I am become Troll, destroyer of threads
    2. Re:Not really a premier... by checkitout · · Score: 2

      Well the actual "press release" information about the trailer mentions that it was originally shown at the convention in Tulsa.

      http://www.startrek.com/news/news.asp?ID=124934

    3. Re:Not really a premier... by koganuts · · Score: 1

      "I've got a 3" DVD of it that was given away at Tulsa."

      It's actually a 3" CD-ROM, not a DVD.

    4. Re:Not really a premier... by koganuts · · Score: 1

      "So rip it and post it dude... Man... I have to think of everything..."

      For what it's worth, the desktop wallpapers, AIM buddy icons, and screencaps from the screensaver are available here and the screensaver itself is available here.

    5. Re:Not really a premier... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      For what it's worth you can just go ahead and abbreviate that to FWIW - everyone here will understand. You have been assimilated.

    6. Re:Not really a premier... by Alsee · · Score: 1, Troll

      So rip it and post it dude

      Sure - here it is...

      ?EáÿÀÀàà.??Ö,Õ?X?ÀôRI?:;?M?àRæXE???ê?£Srâ[ )ShÔÙ?ÂmÜVÌc©?VðOp?óÙ,è9?Æ-e?6Æ??v?ot?Zi[\*Ø oåÜîôìA?'"ó?Saf6ÓZ Õ?{60?NÖC?öâ&\qh¥a?è?[Zê|/;ØÆtfM`B×BYYr#X B£sV?{5¦)gÍxÆJT870±æPÈ+ØÖ?ÙgjHS$??Â?l??kUÇ ìxMêêÈV-j?RPë©Ý?÷ÐRbÒ¼ëR*í.HÔc"??0?ÎmÈFÇLueÔQ ðÿ?Ö¦ËìØLç??Ó Ñß(óaÜa:ÖYàáÝæauã×*Ç?4v;nÖm@ÎËVß{nkAË!Iw;???½Ù- j2w&?[åha±Kn?GÀ/iÚèDÈn{d?@j=mvPÇ?¦j'?6X?ÉkI9M Ûsk?7ý®

      P.S.
      Commander Taco! That last phaser hit knocked our lamness filters down to 29%!

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    7. Re:Not really a premier... by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Okay, this really deserves a "Are the moderators on crack?!?" post. WTF... insightful?!

    8. Re:Not really a premier... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't think to go to the Sci-Fi convention in Tulsa to get your own 3" DVD, now did you?

    9. Re:Not really a premier... by JonWan · · Score: 1

      oops my bad, I haven't even viewed it yet. I didn't get to go to Tulsa this year. :-(

  5. Make it so...Please by Joel+Ironstone · · Score: 1

    Man do I ever hope this film will include the TNG staff and not one of the later soap opera type series. My friend has a Deanna Troy action figure on which the red paint on the chest has been rubbed off.

    1. Re:Make it so...Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya but since you and your friend are homosexuals the paint is gone becuase he likes to stick it up his butt and jack off not becuase he was fondling it.

    2. Re:Make it so...Please by Alex+Thorpe · · Score: 1

      Myself, I prefer DS9's intermittent story arcs and Bajoran prophecies to TNG's threat of the week approach. Also, Deanna Troi wasn't at all hot in the first few seasons of the show.

      --
      "Common Sense Ain't" -Unknown
    3. Re:Make it so...Please by iiii · · Score: 3, Informative

      No need to scrape the paint off. There are actual real nude pix of her out there.

      --
      Light cup, beer drink, thin so chain, neck turtle fat, man I won't say it again
    4. Re:Make it so...Please by Erbo · · Score: 2
      Personally, I think Troi looked better when she started wearing a real uniform instead of the "boob uniform." Getting rid of the cheerleader curls also helped...

      For awhile there, I thought Star Trek was doing a good job in starting to portray its female characters more realistically, downplaying the "sex object" angle in favor of smart, tough female characters like Kira Nerys, Jadzia Dax, and Kathryn Janeway. Then I guess someone must have gotten scared that they were losing the 16-25 male demographic, because then we got Seven of Nine and her sprayed-on catsuit, and the "decontamination gel" shower scene on Enterprise. Oh well, win some, lose some...

      --
      Be who you are...and be it in style!
    5. Re:Make it so...Please by Edgy+Loner · · Score: 1

      Just FYI, the picture second from the right in the top row (the really good looking one) is a cut and paste job.It actually was one of the Fake Detective's example photos.

  6. I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 5, Funny
    On Earth Prime, it would be unthinkable, what I am thinking now: I have no interest in any of the Star Wars movies, and I'm looking forward to seeing Wesley Crusher in the new Star Trek movie.

    Now you'll have to excuse me, the perpetual motion machine is a little loud, and needs to be oiled.

    1. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by fishlet · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Well maybe he's not a little dweeb anymore... just a big dweep. Here's hoping - not

    2. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2

      Like many others, I've grown into a real fan (in the lighter "I like what he's done with his public persona and I hope for his continued success," not the "I collect merchandise and have a signed photo" sense, which I reserve mostly for neuroscientists and Brazilian swimsuit models) of Wil Wheaton. I don't see any reference to his appearance in the movie preview, though - any news on that front?

    3. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by Skirwan · · Score: 5, Funny
      Now you'll have to excuse me, the perpetual motion machine is a little loud, and needs to be oiled.
      Young man, on this forum we obey the laws of thermodynamics!

      Oh, wait... this is Star Trek, not the Simpsons... Umm, Heisenberg compensators to full! Engage!

      --
      Damn the Emperor!
    4. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by delphin42 · · Score: 1, Informative

      http://us.imdb.com/Details?0253754

      According to IMDB, Wil Wheaton won't be in Nemesis.

      --
      -- Adam
    5. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by Brian_Ellenberger · · Score: 1

      Trust me, that will change once you read the plot. It sounds like a bad first season reject . Or perhaps more like a bad soap opera plot...

      Brian Ellenberger

    6. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by zephc · · Score: 2

      sure he is, he's just using his stage name, 'Whoopi Goldberg'

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    7. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      I'm _praying_ he wont. On cinescape's site, like around a month ago, there was a link to Wheaton's personal site where he was crying like a little girl that they were talking about cutting his scenes. He was annoying as a little deity-wannabe in the series, so how could he be anything BUT annoying in the movie...

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    8. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 1
      and I'm looking forward to seeing Wesley Crusher in the new Star Trek movie.

      So am I. Here's my suggestion of how to do it:

      Captain Picard: Do we have Westley's shuttlepod within visual range?
      Data: Affirmative
      Picard: Fire quantum torpedoes
      Data: Shuttlepod destroyed.

    9. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 5, Informative

      According to Wil himself, he will. Check his web page. Also IMDB has it listed. http://us.imdb.com/Trivia?0253754

    10. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by KingAdrock · · Score: 1

      Unfortunetly for you Wil was left on the cutting room floor!

    11. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it just me or does the imdb picture of Michael Dorn look like O.J. Simpson?

    12. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realize he doesn't get paid if his scenes are cut and he's not in the movie, right? How would you like to spend 3+ months working on a project, only to have it canceled and be told "Sorry, we're not going to pay you for these 3 months because we aren't selling this product." Fucking retard.

    13. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      Well, if your parent poster is American, he can stick to the tried and true American rebuttal .. judging from his objective assesment of Wil Wheaton's site, I'm guessing it will be along the lines of "Because he's a fucking baby and deserves it."

      I, for one, want to see him in the movie. It was the TNG writers who were incapable of making Wil Wheaton look like anything above a Boy Scout who'd won the "Travel With the Enterprise" contest.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    14. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm - he's black. And male. It's just you.

    15. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by balthan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yup. Only the 16 people listed on the IMDB page will be in the movie. No other cast members whatsoever.

    16. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by gorilla · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Credits on IMDB are often incomplete until the film actually shows. I guess it depends on how well the publicity dept is at talking to IMDB.

    17. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by Alsee · · Score: 2

      he's just using his stage name, 'Whoopi Goldberg'

      Let me guess - yet another transporter accident?

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    18. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by citizenc · · Score: 2

      An interesting side-bar to that quote is that a perpetual motion machine has NOTHING to do with thermodynamics... thermodynamics is, approximately, the study of the transfer of heat between mediums.

      Silly Simpsons writers! =)

    19. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by klui · · Score: 1

      Actually, he wasn't sure as per his website www.wilwheaton.net. Current info is at Coming Attractions by Corona

    20. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by Tower · · Score: 1

      Ah, but heat and motion are both energy (both types of kinetic energy, in fact), and the Laws O' Thermo guard the lack of creaton/destruction of said energy... since the machine was not in a vaccuum and completely frictionless (including internal component frictions), heat must have been created (i.e. motion energy translated to heat energy, since energy cannot be created nor destroyed - First LoT).

      ITYS.

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
    21. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by maxume · · Score: 2

      well, see, a perpetual motion machine probably needs some energy, to be perpetually in motion and what not. Following from this, the energy must come from somewhere, right?

      So anyway, at this point in time, there aren't really any energy generating devices that don't essentially rely on **drumroll** "the transfer of heat between mediums."

      have a nice day.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    22. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      I dont think he "deserves" anything but appropriate treatment for his acting capability. Watching him in the Sci-Fi channel production (i forget what it was called, but it was about him having been peiced together from dozens of body-part donors, and having to determine his "self"), I am pretty sure he's lacking as an actor. If, then, the producers of the film determine that for whatever reason (incl. writing reasons or his failures) that they dont want his product (and he was foolish enough to not contract for work time as opposed to a finished product) then I say thats the way life goes. A smart actor would either get assurance that his scenes would be paid for, regardless of their use, or would get assurance that they would be used. Besides, he knew what he was getting into with acting - no one held a gun to his head.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    23. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by Alexis+Morissette · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's just my memory going bad, but were Spot and Guinan not in the last two movies? And if they weren't, did they ever give an explanation? I don't remember either of them leaving the ship...

      --
      This is a special excite .sig
      This
    24. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by TheBishop · · Score: 1
      Also in that trivia from imdb:
      Denise Crosby discussed with executive producer Rick Berman the possibility of using her Star Trek: The Next Generation character Sela in the film, but they could not work out a way to properly fit the character into the movie.
      Fuck, when has that ever stopped them before? Think "Voyager"
    25. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 1

      I'm trying to think of this as a "quality" movie, or at least enjoyable. I'll try not to think Voyager at all. =)

    26. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by hplasm · · Score: 1
      Ah, but (a) The Laws Of Thermodynamics (TM) viz q.v are what (b) Perpetual Motion Machines (Inc) etc contravene.....

      GONK! GONK!! GONK!!!

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
    27. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know I'm in Bizarro world(tm), because, according to the site, the film is due out on the twelfth of Decembuary (the month between December and January).

  7. My penis throbs with delight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    This is great news. I really like Star Wars Trek Seaquest Man 9 Bot Mon Adventures! The only think better would be a showdown between Major Kirk and Captain Skywalking!

  8. This would probably be ... by LordNimon · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... the first time I use my TiVo to fast forward through a show so I can watch the commercials.

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    1. Re:This would probably be ... by DebianDog · · Score: 1

      Damn you beat me to it. I LOVE TiVo!!!!

    2. Re:This would probably be ... by finny · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... the first time I use my TiVo to fast forward through a show so I can watch the commercials.

      Wow, so you actualy watched the Superbowl?

    3. Re:This would probably be ... by (startx) · · Score: 1

      dude, I've done that for a couple of years. it's call the superbowl. forget football, it's all about the comercials.

      Just to be on topic, I think it's actually airing during the show, not in the comercials, so don't skip to the comercials.

    4. Re:This would probably be ... by Alsee · · Score: 3, Funny

      use my TiVo to fast forward

      It's theft. Your contract with the network when you get the ads is you're going to watch the show. Otherwise you couldn't get the ads on a show-supported basis.

      I guess there's a certain amount of tolerance for going to the bathroom.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    5. Re:This would probably be ... by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      I don't like football, so I watched neither the Superbowl nor its ads.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
  9. Move on, nothing to see here. by TRoLLaXoR · · Score: 0, Funny

    The franchise is beyond lame, bled of all creativity by corporate vampires, and should have been put down a decade ago when it still had some class and style.

    1. Re:Move on, nothing to see here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the thing that leaves hope for this movie is that it has the cast that was around a decade ago, when it had some class and style.

      The day they make a Voyager movie is the day that all hope for Star Trek is lost, but that day has not yet come.

  10. Time Error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Star Trek Website say the office release will be at 7:30PM PDT not 7:30EDT.

  11. yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well i would boycott the MPAA but since they control geek culture ala star trek and star wars i guess i'll have to cough up the bucks so i can participate in my own culture.

    Not!

    fuck movies.

  12. mpaa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    what happened to saying 'fuck the mpaa'?

    1. Re:mpaa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, yeah, that's right! Thanks for reminding us! The same exact post in every other movie related, 50 times over, didn't quite drive it home.

      The /. folks could save a lot of people a lot of time by automatically generating a "What about the boycott?" comment in all movie threads. Why don't people like this even read the Movie posts? None of them watch movies anyway.

    2. Re:mpaa? by DrNibbler · · Score: 1

      No Today is Tuesday ... in Tuesdays we like the mpaa and despise the RIAA. Please the schedule is available in the FAQ

      --
      Sean.OutaHere()
    3. Re:mpaa? by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've said it before, and I'll say it again:

      First, the site isn't anti-MPAA. Many of it's users are. The site is a news and discussion forum.

      Second, not all Slashdot readers are Anti-MPAA. Some don't give a rat's ass about the issue. Some, like me, realize the issues and have come to an internal compromise. Some users haven't bought a movie ticket or DVD in years. You have to realize that there are many thousands of posters, and not all have the same opinions about issues.

      Just remember, /. is a community, but few communities hold a single viewpont on any given issue.

    4. Re:mpaa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tuesday? Not where I am it's not...

    5. Re:mpaa? by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We're anti-MPAA, not anti-interesting movies.

      If none of us liked movies, the MPAA couldn't piss us off.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:mpaa? by Jaycatt · · Score: 1

      Hear hear... This is the kind of message that should be posted as a response to the "What about the boycott?" questions, as a general rule. It's so easy to generalize people and it actually takes an effort to avoid doing so.

      --
      "Shared pain is lessened; shared joy is increased. Thus we refute entropy" - Spider Robinson
    7. Re:mpaa? by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 2

      Indeed...I copy/pasted/adjusted this message from another post I made a few weeks back. Some people don't get that /. is a community of individuals, not one voice.

    8. Re:mpaa? by Thud457 · · Score: 0

      > Re:mpaa? (Score:1)
      &gt by DrNibbler (sean AT seanreiser DOT com) on Wednesday June 26, @01:01PM (#3770392)
      &gt(User #547534 Info | http://slashdot.org/)
      &gt
      &gt
      &gt No Today is Tuesday ... in Tuesdays we like the mpaa and despise the RIAA. Please the schedule is available in the FAQ
      &gt

      BRAVO! Well done.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    9. Re:mpaa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. Like the freakin' moderators.
      Or the alledged "editors".

    10. Re:mpaa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh so if you didn't like movies then you wouldn't mind if some huge media cartel decided to make it illegal to use your computer for other things besides watching their movies? heh.

    11. Re:mpaa? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      Heh. I love it when people make assumptions to the extreme.

      No I would definitely mind if it happened that way. I don't think it would, though. The cause of the SSSCA proposal was that people were trading movies. People weren't trading movies just for shits and giggles, they were doing it to acquire the movies. Hence, demand for movies because they're popular. Had the movies not been popular enough to trade, no SSSCA.

      :P

      I dunno why I wrote all that, I think you're just pulling my leg. Heh. Fun stuff. :)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    12. Re:mpaa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The majority of computer users don't trade illegal movies and the majority of computer hardware will never play or copy an illegal movie. So yes it is happening that way. Remeber this is more of a open source site than a warez d00d hangout so yes the mpaa would still piss us off even if we didn't like movies. Alan Cox isn't big on trading 0-day VCDs but the MPAA still pisses him off...

    13. Re:mpaa? by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2

      No kidding. It's easy to hate M$ because Bill's evil AND they have shitty code. The MPAA may be clueless but the guys who actually make the movies really do seem to try to do a good job, even with a franchise as worn as Star Trek. Damn them for being so very excellent every now and then!

      --
      Dyolf Knip
  13. Hmmm... by jonfromspace · · Score: 4, Funny
    From the site:
    The new "Star Trek: Nemesis" trailer runs 1:34 and will also play in theaters, starting with the July 4th weekend. The official "Star Trek: Nemesis" movie site will give fans plenty to whet their appetites, with stunning imagery from the film, a 360-degree IPIX view of the Romulan Senate set


    Wow... the IS a use for IPIX :)

    --
    I am become Troll, destroyer of threads
    1. Re:Hmmm... by Buran · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It certainly took them long enough to have the Rihannsu ... err, Romulans ... get a real role in one of the films. Too bad it never happened while I played one in an online RPG. But I still have an interest in them as a lingering result.

      If you want to learn more about them, find a copy of Diane Duane's novel The Romulan Way, preferably at a good used-book shop. It's not canon because it's just a novel, but it's damn good. It explains their form of government. (Incidentally, the "Senate" dates to ancient Roman times, I do believe. Many of the ranks the Romulans used, e.g. centurion, do as well.)

    2. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think it's possible to be a bigger loser than you.

    3. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've just proven yourself wrong.

    4. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to say it, buddy, but this movie is probably going to rip a hole about a mile wide in the canonicity of Duane's work. This movie might make you cry.

  14. to go... by zephc · · Score: 2

    ...where no one has gone before, getting fatter, balder along the way.

    --
    "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    1. Re:to go... by GungaDan · · Score: 3, Funny
      Exactly how will Picard become more bald?

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    2. Re:to go... by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      > Exactly how will Picard become more bald?
      By using whatever technique it is that Jimmy Doohan uses to get fatter (I'm not sure yet whether he's massive enough to implode into a black hole yet, but he's a damn find candidate for "where is the missing mass of the Universe" :)

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    3. Re:to go... by Dstrct0 · · Score: 1

      Nobody said he's only gonna lose hair off of his head...

      --
      Build boards not bombs
  15. Die MPAA, Die! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oooooh, wait, Star Trek! Must go see the movie!

  16. Re:Does Data die in the trailer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well duh, how is a robot gonna get old and crusty?

    Unless brent spiner is down for getting a shitload of plastic surgery everytme on of these movies comes out then data's gotta go.

  17. It will air in front of Men in Black II... by koganuts · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Hopefully it'll get placed in front of some of the movies coming in the next few weeks (maybe MiB2?)" According to this post, it will indeed air in front of Men in Black II. And there's already a shot-by-shot breakdown online.

  18. Re:Does Data die in the trailer? by SWTP · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hum...

    So they have the blue screen of death in the 24 century still?!!!!! Sheech.

    At least they wont need a planet this time to reactivate him!

  19. Re:Does Data die in the trailer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    George Lucas would just CGI him... you don't need real actors when you have a computer to create fake ones.

  20. On Nemesis etymology by fruey · · Score: 2, Insightful
    nemesis Pronunciation Key (nm-ss) n. pl. nemeses (-sz)

    A source of harm or ruin: Uncritical trust is my nemesis.
    Sounds like the Slashdot effect

    Retributive justice in its execution or outcome: To follow the proposed course of action is to invite nemesis.
    i.e., clicking the link at the launch time is inviting Nemesis...

    An opponent that cannot be beaten or overcome.
    The unconscious attitude that rests, all the same, with Slashdot readers... that they will get to see the page even though thousands of others are all trying at the same time.

    One that inflicts retribution or vengeance.
    It will be in Quicktime no doubt and everyone will be seeking their Wine, so maybe that should be re-distribution (changing distro?) so that they have better Quicktime support in friendly RPM format (yes I'm getting tenuous now)

    Nemesis Greek Mythology. The goddess of retributive justice or vengeance.
    Godesses... Rather than cite any myself (OK, I always fancied a bit of Deanna Troi actually) I invite you to comment...

    --
    Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    1. Re:On Nemesis etymology by mbyte · · Score: 3, Funny

      you forgot one (from snatch ;)

      Do you know what "nemesis" means? A righteous infliction of retribution manifested by an appropriate agent. Personified in this instance by an 'orrible cunt... me!

    2. Re:On Nemesis etymology by PyromanFO · · Score: 1

      So youre my arch nemesises, nemisses, nemissess ...

    3. Re:On Nemesis etymology by NullProg · · Score: 1

      In astronomy circles, it is also known as the 12th planet. AKA Planet-X. See Bode's rule.

      http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/ice_fire/v1bodesr.htm

      or here at

      http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/nemhyp2.htm

      Enjoy,

      --
      It's just the normal noises in here.
    4. Re:On Nemesis etymology by fruey · · Score: 1

      That sounds pretty far out but convincing enough. I've been interested in extinction events for some time. Any more general links you have would be appreciated

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
  21. Uhh.. by legoboy · · Score: 5, Funny
    Makes me wish I could stomach ET

    Why does CmdrTaco want to eat a cute, cuddly alien?

    --
    If a tree falls on an anonymous coward yelling 'first post' in the forest, does anybody hear?
    1. Re:Uhh.. by macdaddy357 · · Score: 0

      Go see Lilo and Stitch. That's all cutesy cuddly.
      Meesa thinking Stitch sound mui mui like Jar Jar. Meesa no can stomach!

      --
      How ya like dat?
    2. Re:Uhh.. by SubMissionary · · Score: 1

      Because "et" is a colloquial past tense of eat, and through holistic, etymological karma, he must.

      --
      --Look behind you.
    3. Re:Uhh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You evil downward moderator! Now I only have 103 karma left, rather than 104.

    4. Re:Uhh.. by Col.+Panic · · Score: 1

      Tried to take my 10 yr old nephew on Friday night, but it was sold out praise God. Went to Scooby Doo for the second time instead. Mmm Daphne Buffy.

    5. Re:Uhh.. by Rupert · · Score: 2

      I think he means he can't stomach Eastern Time. That's got to be rough, living in Michigan. Perhaps he'd be better off if he moved across the lake to Chicago (Central Time).

      --

      --
      E_NOSIG
    6. Re:Uhh.. by nomadic · · Score: 1

      All civilized people use EST.

      Barbarians.

    7. Re:Uhh.. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1
      Daphne? Feh. It's allllll about Velma.

      Best line from movie: "Nice sweater."

    8. Re:Uhh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Velma? Daphne? Don't make me choose! Why not both together ;)

      (although neither can compete with Wilma Flintstone)

    9. Re:Uhh.. by Requiem · · Score: 1

      Repeat after me: Daphne is supposed to be a redhead.

    10. Re:Uhh.. by goodEvans · · Score: 1

      but she'd never leave Fred, man.

    11. Re:Uhh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, you're right - she'd never leave Fred

  22. MOD PARENT UP TO +5, FUNNY by Raul654 · · Score: 0

    Very funny....

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
  23. Odd or Even? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do odd numbered Star Trek movies still suck while the even movie are good still apply with the next generation films or did that phenomenon only apply to the original cast members? Since this is the tenth Star Trek movie hopefully it will be good, regardless if Wesley is on board.

    1. Re:Odd or Even? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Genesis (odd) sucked, First Contact (even) ruled, Insurrection (odd) while not totally full of suck is entirely forgettable. So, yes, it still holds true... unless 10 messes it up.

    2. Re:Odd or Even? by AsylumWraith · · Score: 1

      ...Genesis (odd)

      I assume you meant Generations. But yeah, the odd and even theory definitely still holds true.

    3. Re:Odd or Even? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I've got Khan on the brain... KHHHAAAAAANNNN!!

  24. Trailer screenshots already up... by koganuts · · Score: 3, Informative

    Forgot to add that trailer screenshots are already up right... here.

  25. I hear ya... by GuyMannDude · · Score: 1

    My friend has a Deanna Troy action figure on which the red paint on the chest has been rubbed off.

    Heh. I remember rummaging through my old Star Wars toys a few years ago. I had to chuckle when I noticed my Princess Leia figure had indelable smudges all over her chest from my years of fondling her as a child. Hey, let's face it. As a wee kiddie I didn't have access to Playboy. And I had no idea what the Internet was. So groping my precious Leia figure was the only sexual release a poor young GMD could get.

    Gees I dunno why I'm telling you all this. I hope I don't get billed from psych counsuling from CmdrTaco....

    GMD

  26. That's because by wiredog · · Score: 1

    Wesley has such a CleverNickName, and Obi-Wan doesn't.

  27. Annoying sig reply by GungaDan · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    "lobotomy" is spelled with 3 "Os" and no "As." Carry on.

    --
    Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    1. Re:Annoying sig reply by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that "torpedo's" is NOT the plural of "torpedo".

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    2. Re:Annoying sig reply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is then, torpedi?

    3. Re:Annoying sig reply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Speaking of annoying sig replies, here's another one... :)
      America - the country that bought you Microsoft Windows

      1) No country has bought Windows for me.
      2) America is the land mass of the western hemisphere. America is not a country. I don't suppose you think Boston is in North America and Houston is in South America?

  28. Movie Format by nullard · · Score: 5, Informative
    Or, maybe we will be even luckier and it wont even be released in quicktime at all!

    Or maybe we will be even luckier and group of /.ers who can't differentiate between a file format and a codec will get a clue and stop bashing QuickTime when they are pissed off at Sorrenson's licensing. QuickTime is the perfect format for distributing multimedia since it is the most widely supported format. Also: old applications that used to play QuickTime movies continue to work with the new versions perfectly. You can still use MoviePlayer 2.5 to watch QuickTime 5 movies. The whole framework was is elegantly designed and very expandable. If you don't like not being ablt to watch QuickTime movies on Linux, find a better, more free codec to use and convince the trailer makers to adopt it.

    In any case the original article says:
    The "Star Trek: Nemesis" trailer will then launch online ... in the QuickTime format ... additional streaming formats will also be available soon.
    --


    t'nera semordnilap
    1. Re:Movie Format by jafuser · · Score: 1, Troll

      All quicktime "movie player" applications have sucked. Until they release codecs for Windows Media Player 6.x (one of the few clean and elegant players, I refuse to upgrade to WMP7 or 8), I'll continue to irrationally generalize that "Quicktime Sucks". As far as that goes, any overdone GUI that tries to metaphor itself to look "prettier" at the expense of efficiency and elegance, sucks.

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    2. Re:Movie Format by Kwikymart · · Score: 0, Troll

      "Or maybe we will be even luckier and group of /.ers who can't differentiate between a file format and a codec will get a clue and stop bashing QuickTime when they are pissed off at Sorrenson's licensing."

      I understand the difference perfectly. The sorenson codec is assumed in my statement. Methinks you should be less anal. Anyway, the quicktime media plalyer sucks regardless.

      "If you don't like not being ablt to watch QuickTime movies on Linux,..."

      Who says I am using Linux? You just assumed that. For the record, I am not using it currently. What does this mean? Assumption is the mother of all fuckups, (like how it is assumed we are talking about the sorenson codec). It was a fuckup in my case as to bring flaming retards such as yourself. And guess what? I don't really care.

      My suggestion is to lose the superiority attitude and come down the planet earth. Go find something else to do other than point out errors in mattters nobody cares about.

      I await your response flame to protect your "image".

      --

      Buying a Dell computer is equivalent to dropping the soap in a prison shower.
    3. Re:Movie Format by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahahahahaha, get off the fucking LSD man. Your brain is turning to mush.

    4. Re:Movie Format by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "WMP sacrifices ease-of-use, capabilities"

      Mind citing examples? Whenever I want to watch a DVD, divx movie, or tv show I just double click on WMP, right click on the display area, select full screen, and press play.

      I hardly find this to be a difficult sequence of events to comprehend.

    5. Re:Movie Format by Squarewav · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry but quicktime sucks, not because you cant play movies under linux ether, *.mov files are almost twice the size of other popular formats such as mpg 1&2 and as much as 3 times the size of windows media the only real advantage of them is they look better compared to same res and bitrate of other formats

    6. Re:Movie Format by VoiceOfRaisin · · Score: 1

      um. hello? maybe he was just stating that the quicktime software sucks? nothing about the codec? you assume way too much sir.

    7. Re:Movie Format by GlassUser · · Score: 2

      I perfectly understand the difference between a file format and a codec. But neither of the two that are related to QuickTime are published standards. Therefore, at least in my opinion, they suck. Both of them. THEREFORE, I can say that QuickTime files, as a whole, suck.

    8. Re:Movie Format by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "3 times the size of windows media the only real advantage of them is they look better compared to same res and bitrate of other formats"

      How are QTs "twice the size" at the "same bitrate"? Methinks you are not quite clear on the concept of "bitrate" (ie bits per second x "# of seconds" = total number of bits, right?).

    9. Re:Movie Format by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try the keyboard commands that used to exist in WMP6, most importantly, space == pause.

    10. Re:Movie Format by gbooker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I perfectly understand the difference between a file format and a codec. But neither of the two that are related to QuickTime are published standards. Therefore, at least in my opinion, they suck. Both of them. THEREFORE, I can say that QuickTime files, as a whole, suck.

      It is true that the codec is not a publish standard, but the file format is! I have read descriptions of the file format and C code that reads it, all from Apple's web site. Perhaps you should do some research before you go on an uninformed tirade.

      --
      You see? It's like I've always said. You can get more with a kind word and a 2x4 than you can with just a kind word.
    11. Re:Movie Format by GlassUser · · Score: 2

      I have been proven wrong. Thank you. I still hate the codec though. :) Any idea where I can get a F/free version of it for windows systems?

    12. Re:Movie Format by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ctrl-P of course being too difficult for you to manage..........

    13. Re:Movie Format by gbooker · · Score: 1

      I assume that you are not talking about something to play QT files as it is already free. The pro, well, you can find key generators if you look.

      Sorenson Pro for windows, well, I don't really know since I am a MacOS X user.

      I find it interesting that you are looking for a free version of it after you said that it sucks. Oh well. Is it that you think that it is good enough if you can get it for free, only you can't justify shelling out money for it?

      --
      You see? It's like I've always said. You can get more with a kind word and a 2x4 than you can with just a kind word.
    14. Re:Movie Format by GlassUser · · Score: 1

      I don't want all the apple-branded QT crapware installed, just the codec.

      I need it, because I am a network administrator and required to make certain programs work, and the idiot developers put all the animations into quicktime files. I asked them to please use something everyone can look at, and they said "oh, no, quicktime is free, just download it". When I said something about "Alpha", they got all confused. I think he hung up after I said "different platforms".

    15. Re:Movie Format by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Fucking mac users and their fucking defensive bullshit. Most widely supported? Bullshit. Less than 5% of the world runs an OS that QT has bothered to optimize their player for. Ever try playing QT fullscreen on a PC? Even a 2Ghz PC? Craptacular. Try MPEG fuckwit.

      And watch... i'll post AC because i don't care to blow karma correcting losers, and as usual i'll be ticked off to find this post actually gets modded up. Gotta love /.

  29. EST eh? by saddino · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Dark Horizons is reporting that the trailer for the next Star Trek movie will premiere tonight on Entertainment Tonight and via the official website tonight at 7:30 EST."

    Data: Captain, although /. mentions EST, I find it 99.999% likely that the time is actually EDT, especially given that the US is on Daylight Savings time.
    Picard: Well put, Data. That is precisely why the Federation uses the Stardate time standard.
    Guinan: More oil, Data, honey.

    1. Re:EST eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that in most of Indiana, it will indeed be shown at 7:30 EST.

    2. Re:EST eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow you're a big fuckin nerd! haha.

    3. Re:EST eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And actually, if you read the Star Trek website and the Dark Horizon's website...it's 7:30 PDT, wrong side of the country geniuses...

    4. Re:EST eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7:30 PDT == 10:30 EDT == 9:30 EST

      -ac

  30. Re:Dang! I was hoping for a StarWars vs Startrek m by macdaddy357 · · Score: 0

    Then Superman whoops his ass! As Shatner said on SNL, "Get a life! Move out of your mother's basement. Have you ever kissed a girl? It's a TV show!"

    --
    How ya like dat?
  31. 2,4,6,8...? by jgman · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I will be interested to see if the rule of Star Trek movies follows with Nemesis. Odd number Trek movies suck, even numbers rule.

    Odd -
    Motion Picture - Tried too hard for artistry
    Search For Spock - it just blew!
    The Final Frontier - Spock's Half Brother? Gah!
    Generations - They could have done so much between the casts and didn't
    Insurrection - I just couldn't buy those alien bad guys.

    Even -
    Wrath of Khan - Rocks! Gotta love Kirk yelling KHAAAAAAN!
    The Voyage Home - So many great lines. Merged the comedic aspects very well. Nuclear wessels!
    The Undiscovered Country - My personal Favorite. Gotta Love the zero grav scene. Guess who's coming to Dinner.
    First Contact - Time Travel... Gotta Love Time Travel. Now if they would only set a Star Trek Movie in the Mirror, Mirror Universe.
    Nemesis - ?

    I have high hopes this pattern will not disappoint me on this Tenth movie.

    --
    This is not the sig you are looking for...
    1. Re:2,4,6,8...? by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2

      STIII:TSFS was highly underrated. It didn't blow.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    2. Re:2,4,6,8...? by LighthouseJ · · Score: 0

      You sound like the poster-child of a Trekkie. Some overweight 30 year old in a Star Trek uniform 3 sizes too small for you. (See the Comic Book Guy in The Simpsons as reference.) Remember, every time a 30 year old virgin buys a novelty Star Trek stun gun, Baby Jesus Cries.

      If you don't believe me, read this: I have high hopes this pattern will not disappoint me on this Tenth movie.

    3. Re:2,4,6,8...? by Alex+Thorpe · · Score: 1

      The pattern doesn't really hold for me. I'm in the minority that enjoyed The Motion Picture, and the recent Director's Edition corrects some of the more confusing visuals. I don't think there's anything wrong with the Search for Spock, and consider it average, though it WAS the first movie with an official Klingon language. I've not even seen Insurrection, though.

      My only problem with the Wrath of Khan is that I watched it WAAAAY too many times on cable back in the 80's. Why watch it again when you've memorized the dialogue? I didn't like First Contact; the Borg Queen concept is rather silly, and the scenes with Mr. Cochran were rather boring.

      But that's all IMHO.

      --
      "Common Sense Ain't" -Unknown
    4. Re:2,4,6,8...? by jgman · · Score: 1

      not a trekkie (trekker?) or a virgin thank God! Just a Science Fiction Fan. Hell, I've never even watched an entire episode of Enterprise.

      While I would never dis on the Comic Book Guy from Simpsons, I also loved the South Park trekkies from the Timmy in Time Episode.

      So no, not a trekkie, just a tech geek.

      --
      This is not the sig you are looking for...
    5. Re:2,4,6,8...? by Saige · · Score: 3, Funny

      Generations - They could have done so much between the casts and didn't

      Screw that - what made Generations so bad was a plot hole big enough to fly the entire Federtion fleet through all at once.

      Let's see, distress call at station, Enterprise goes to help, bad guy abucts Geordi and blows up star, getting away. Eventually, they track him down, Picard goes to planet, fails to stop him, sucked into Nexus. While in Nexus, Picard can travel to ANY point in time? Does he go back to back in orbit, knowing where to use torpedos/phasers to destroy the launch site? Does he go back to just when the star explodes, so they can head STRAIGHT to the destination planet, beating the other ship? Or, even more intelligently, does he go back to when they first arrive at the station, so they can toss the bad guy in the brig, search the station, find the torpedo set to destroy the star, and prevent the whole thing?

      OF COURSE NOT. We go back to just a couple minutes ago, with an overweight, horrible actor playing a previous Enterprise captain, at a time when they still have a really tough time defeating the enemy - never mind that they could be totally aware that, should they screw up, they'd go back into the Nexus to try again, and again, and again.

      Why go back to that moment? It makes absolutely no sense, unless you're deliberately trying to make stopping the bad guy as DIFFICULT as possible.

      Oh, and BTW, First Contact's huge plot hole? The Borg could simply have sent the probe back in time at some other place in the galaxy, not having alerted the federation to their plans, therefore, not having had any challenge to their assimilation. But then again, adding time travel instantly makes it insanely difficult to prevent plot holes, due to the way things can work out.

      I thought Insurrection was the best of the three because of the comparative lack of plot holes.

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
    6. Re:2,4,6,8...? by ShavenYak · · Score: 2

      While in Nexus, Picard can travel to ANY point in time? Does he go back to back in orbit, knowing where to use torpedos/phasers to destroy the launch site? Does he go back to just when the star explodes, so they can head STRAIGHT to the destination planet, beating the other ship? Or, even more intelligently, does he go back to when they first arrive at the station, so they can toss the bad guy in the brig, search the station, find the torpedo set to destroy the star, and prevent the whole thing?

      Perhaps he was afraid going back too far would cause problems in the timeline. Also, I'm wondering if there'd be an issue with two Picards and Kirk suddenly being aboard Enterprise. Although, I suppose the Picard returning from the Nexus must replace the already-existing Picard, since Kirk and he didn't run into himself on the planet's surface.

      I thought the entire concept was cheesy, though, so what am I doing trying to defend it?

      Oh, and BTW, First Contact's huge plot hole? The Borg could simply have sent the probe back in time at some other place in the galaxy, not having alerted the federation to their plans...

      I got the impression the Borg were just planning a full-scale assault on Earth, and the time-travel idea was hatched after they realized they were going to get blown up. Remember, Picard was supposed to be watching the neutral zone. Had he not defied Starfleet orders, the Borg cube would probably have wiped out the fleet in short order, and then begun the process of assimilating Earth.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    7. Re:2,4,6,8...? by gilroy · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Blockquoth the poster:

      First Contact - Time Travel... Gotta Love Time Travel.

      Oh, time travel is so hackneyed, especially in the Trekverse. But more importantly, First Contact ruined the Borg. Well, OK, "I, Hugh" began the degeneration, but First Contact was the final nail in the coffin.


      The original Borg was/were the only truly alien aliens in Trek. Their ships were ungraceful (for a reason). They violated bilateral symmetry. Their motives were so alien as to be impossible to even recognize as motives. They were implacable, nigh-omnipotent, and -- most important of all -- not like some subset of humanity with a bad nose. Indeed, they were a reasonable (sort of) extrapolation of Net technology, an honest answer to a what-if question, the best element of sci fi.


      What made them stand out was their communal decemtralized mind... a true unified consciousness, something emergent from the individual entities contained in the Borg net. What did First Contact do? It fell for the cliche "hive mind", took a weak metaphor (social insects) and expanded it, somehow, into a concept even weaker. A Borg Queen? Please! The true Borg would have no truck with a queen, a king, a president, or anything that makes one part more significant/important than another.


      Let's say it again, class: The true Borg are decentralized and distributed. A "Borg Queen" is the exact antithesis of what the Borg were.


      Arrgh. It bothers me every time I think about it. Grrr.

    8. Re:2,4,6,8...? by pyros · · Score: 1

      Does he go back to back in orbit

      Was that a clever illustration of how time travel could be used? Would you have gone back to before you typed it or to just before hitting the submit button?

    9. Re:2,4,6,8...? by leperjuice · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have to agree with you mostly, but I can suggest a real-life computing situation where a "queen" is necessary for operation of the collective.

      Windows 2000 domains.

      Any flaming aside, Windows 2k has something called FSMO ("fizzmo") roles. Short for "Flexible Single Master Operation", the roles correspond to tasks that only one machine in the entire enterprise can do. This is to avoid any sort of duplication/collision of effort for certain important roles. Now, unless you actively do anything, the first box you bring up handles all the tasks (Schema Master, Domain Naming Master, PDC Emulator, RID Master, and Infrastructure Master if you're curious). Any machine can take over any or all of the roles, but there must be only one box handling a role. However, aside from the FSMO roles, all domain controllers are logically equivalent in terms of importance to the domain.

      So, how does this correlate to the Borg? Well, assuming that there are a number of roles to play that are essential to the operation of the collective and that destruction of the master would cause a disruption in the collective mind until regeneration (think of a lost token in tokenring) so you'd choose a protected unit. This would be the "queen". Ideally, however, the system would be such that any unit could take over any or all of the roles quickly in case of danger.

      Of course, why she'd be all slinky and with a removable head is beyond me.

      --

      -- "I am disrespectful to dirt. Can you not see that I am serious!"

    10. Re:2,4,6,8...? by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 1
      STIII:TSFS was highly underrated. It didn't blow.

      Yes, it did.

    11. Re:2,4,6,8...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Voyager ruined the borg even further, however, completly removing any 'they're scary' factor, and effectivly demoting them to panzy aliens who wear black clothes to hide their ugly noses or foreheads.

    12. Re:2,4,6,8...? by DrQuine · · Score: 1

      Amen. Two things:

      1) Amen again. The whole coolness of the borg really derived from that foreign nature and, well, all that. The Queen was pretty much _royally_ lame.

      however,

      1.5) (ok, three things) would you really want the Voyager Borg to have been as cool as the NextGen (series) Borg? Would that really be an acceptable state of affairs?

      2) But the movie was still badass. Even while screwing over the "mythology", it was still next gen and an even numbered movie.

      Jean-Luc! Shame on you for thinking such a thing!

  32. Bandwidth gotcha down? by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 1
    Makes me wish I could stomach ET, or at least had some real bandwidth.

    ...Y'know, Taco, now would be a really good time to upgrade from your Worldcom 56k dialup...

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    1. Re:Bandwidth gotcha down? by FPhlyer · · Score: 2

      Erm... that's a quote from what savagexp wrote, not from what CmdrTaco wrote. Remember... the stuff in quotes and italics was written by the article submitter... not the Slashdot editorial staff.

      --
      Brought to you by Frobozz Magic Penguin Fodder.
    2. Re:Bandwidth gotcha down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah...but the bit about Bandwitdh isn't in italics.

      Owned

  33. This calls for a Wil Wheaton post! by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wil? You there? Does your employment contract with Paramount allow you to geek out on this topic?

    1. Re:This calls for a Wil Wheaton post! by damiangerous · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't expect a comment from him. According to his website, he's on vacation right now. Well, not quite vacation, more like a working vacation. He's on a guest on CruiseTrek.

    2. Re:This calls for a Wil Wheaton post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just checking my favorite website.. On location, can't say where, but I can tell you some things about the movie...

      There is a love story, I know, I know, its suppose to be about action, adventure, and exploration, and that is still all in there, but to keep the ladies satisfied, we needed a little loving.

      First I was opposed to a love story, but then the director told me whom would be involved and doing, then I blew a wad.

      Here are the details... Its a Federation, Romulum, Klingon "council", and I am the Federation rep. You heard it hear first. I'm going to be letting the Romulum and Klingon fight over my body. With "simulated" oral and anal action, how could I say no. Afterall its hard to get any action when everyone thinks you are a geek.

      I hope no one will hate me for not objecting harder, but my penis made the decision, as he was tired of me and wanted some other action.

      This is Wil from the beach..

    3. Re:This calls for a Wil Wheaton post! by daeley · · Score: 2

      He's on a guest on CruiseTrek.

      Sshhh! Be careful, his wife Anne might find out. ;)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    4. Re:This calls for a Wil Wheaton post! by OneFix · · Score: 2

      It's doubtful that Wil would be able to post anyhow, I'm sure that his schedule will probably be pretty much full from now until opening day with special events, interviews, etc. I'm sure he will be able to say some stuff after the movie is opened. But, in general, actors can not talk about plot, other actors, or their role in the story.

      I'm pretty sure Paramount has made it even worse after the whole thing with the ending of Generations...

  34. Data Dies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So do they show the scene where Data dies in the trailer??

    Oh, yeah, uhh, spoiler alert

  35. Screw Star Trek, the T3 teaser is coming by themexican · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to the offical T3 site the T3 teaser will be playing in front of Men in Black.

    1. Re:Screw Star Trek, the T3 teaser is coming by cmdr_forge · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      thing about that is James Cameroon is not directing. And Arnold is fat and lazy...

  36. Heh.. by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

    Great. They've been Slashdotted. I can just see Commander Data drumming his fingers on the console waiting for the hourglass to go away.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Heh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did that get a +4, Funny?

    2. Re:Heh.. by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "How did that get a +4, Funny?"

      That's a tough one. Some philosophers believe that the term 'funny' is used when one says something that makes another laugh. Others believe that the term 'funny' is used when a spoken sentence paints an image that illustrates broken logic.

      The answer to this question may come to you if you remove all conscience thought. If you need help doing that, ask yourself this question:

      "If a Linux user's computer breaks, does Slashdot make a sound?"

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Heh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you just quote yourself in your sig?! That is so very lame, I pity you.

  37. Re:Dang! I was hoping for a StarWars vs Startrek m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    photon torpedos? thats sooo old.

    their quantum torpedos now

  38. Startrek.com down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HTTP Error 403 - Forbidden

    Am I the only one who's getting this?

  39. Check your times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not 7:30 EST, 7:30 PDT....on both Start Trek's site and Dark Horizon's...

    1. Re:Check your times by bje2 · · Score: 2

      that's for the internet version...the ET version will be at 7:30 local time (whenever ET is on in your time zone)...

      --

      "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
  40. i got it too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    prob doubt it will be up in time (or they are saving bandwidth ;))

  41. Uncle Willie.. by DCram · · Score: 1

    Its too bad that Uncle Willie wont have some huge part as like the traveler or some such shit.

    How about some serious shit goes down and Uncle Willie comes out all Q to save the day.. Oh yeah and has lots of hot chicks. All nude.. But taistfully done of course.

    --
    If I were only smart enough to accomplish the things I dream about.. Or maybe too dumb to care.
  42. misunderstanding... by bje2 · · Score: 2

    i think what they're saying is that the trailer premiers on Entertainment tonight (whenever that is on for you)...on the east coast it's at 7:30 PM EDT, on the west coast 7:30 PM PDT...

    also (and here's where the confusion is), the trailer will premier on the internet at 7:30 PM PDT...in other words, you can watch it at 7:30 (local time) on ET...or wait till 7:30 PDT to see it on the internet...obviously, they can't release it on the internet in conjunction with the 7:30 PM EDT showing on ET, because then everyone on the west coast would just download it, and that would ruin the premier on ET on the west coase...

    well, anyway, that's the way i understood it from their web site...

    --

    "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
  43. www.startrek.com by sublimusasterisk · · Score: 0

    Plenty of info over at the official website: " Forbidden Your client is not allowed to access the requested object. " This means the site is slashdotted or ... they're telling us that the borg will be playing a major role in this one?

    --
    True believers seek redemption from the sin of death.
  44. Quicktime by borgboy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Hey, I'm a clueless Windows(tm) user, but I wanna whine about QuickTime too! Come on, guys! It sucks! Yeah!

    --
    meh.
    1. Re:Quicktime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm a clueless Windows(tm) user"

      Which would make you less clueless than the average Mac user.

  45. The Ribbon Returns! by embarcadero · · Score: 3, Funny

    Plot: The Ribbon comes swooping by early 21st Century San Francisco and deposits a young Wesley Crusher in the famous rainbow-striped shirt at the corner of Haight and Ashbury. The story unfolds as he battles depression, overcome that the once-hip intersection is now dominated by a huge Starbucks, serving only Earl Grey, hot, and Mint Tea, hot, with a Ben and Jerry's across the street. He retreats to a small internet cafe and spends the next twenty years working on his blog, and occasionally visiting Gracie the whale at the Monterey Bay Aquarium, which for some reason has been moved ninety miles to the City. At the age of 37, Wesley's snatched out of the oncoming path of a hurtling Suliban-driven MUNI bus by a Traveler from another time, who does some weird magic with his hands and looks despondent, and suddenly they're both in a huge City in the far-distant future, where everything is destruction and decay, and all the citizens are dead. "This wasn't supposed to happen," says the Traveler. Roll credits

    1. Re:The Ribbon Returns! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually he gets dropped off in his rainbow shirt in the Castro district whereupon he discovers his true feelings.

  46. So, IPIX finally works? by docbrown42 · · Score: 1

    The new "Star Trek: Nemesis" trailer runs 1:34 and will also play in theaters, starting with the July 4th weekend. The official "Star Trek: Nemesis" movie site will give fans plenty to whet their appetites, with stunning imagery from the film, a 360-degree IPIX view of the Romulan Senate set

    I guess they finally got the bugs worked out of IPIX in the 24th century.

    -Ed
    docbrown.net
    Graphic Design, Web Design, Role-playing games...all the good stuff

    --
    Ed Wedig
    Graphic design services
    docbrown.net
  47. stomachs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Makes me wish I could stomach ET"

    yeah, and far fewer people can probably stomach slashdot and the boneheaded mods and posters here.

    1. Re:stomachs by savagexp · · Score: 1

      Then why post? Why read /.? If you really can't stand the mods or the posters, why would you bother to become part of it?

      To say something like, "I hate mankind" is understandable because you weren't really given the choice of being human. However, you did choose to navigate over to slashdot. You then chose to click the link over to this article. And then you chose to read some of these posts.

      If you made it this far, don't bitch about it.

      --
      =======================================
      Doer of bad deeds, screenwriter-wannabe
      savagexp
  48. Here's what happened. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Data - "Captain, I am detecting a massive energy fluxuation in our primary communications array."

    Picard - "The source of this problem?"

    Worf - "Long range scans are detecting thousands of incoming Sissaddmin vessels -- Captain, they're firing their ping weaponry at us!"

    Picard - "Divert all power to forward shields."

    Data - "But Captain, that would sever our subspace communication link to /.fleet."

    Picard - "Yes Data, I am well aware of this. Make it so!"

  49. LOL, and you say Apple is better than MS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The trailer will be available in small, large and full-screen sizes (QuickTime Pro 5 required for full-screen viewing).

    Great, PC users have to pay to upgrade Quicktime to be able to watch the full screen trailer. Even Realplayer doesn't have such shitty restrictions.

    Apple once proving once again that it is in fact even more greedy than MS.

    1. Re:LOL, and you say Apple is better than MS... by 47Ronin · · Score: 1

      Why get the full size version when you can just view the large version double-sized?

      Usually "large" trailers from Apple are 480x260, 480x272, or 480x360. And since the compression is usually fine, you can just click on Movie > Double Size and you'll get at least 960x520 .. is that big enough?

      Plus you don't have to pay the Pro price. Heck, you can just take the large trailer and drag the resize handle til it fills the whole screen!

      --
      Those who laugh at you for you having a Mac.. are the people who constantly call you to fix their PC.
  50. Re:Dang! I was hoping for a StarWars vs Startrek m by carlos_benj · · Score: 3, Funny

    Picard: Fire photon torpedo's

    Fire photon torpedo's what?

    Yoda: Diverts torpedo's with a wave of his paw.

    I think you've confused Yoda and Dogbert.

    --

    --

    As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  51. MiB2?? by jerkychew · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Everywhere I turn, I hear about a different trailer being attached to Men In Black 2. First it was The Two Towers, then Terminator 3, and now this? Whatever happened to going to the movies to see the movie??

    1. Re:MiB2?? by savagexp · · Score: 1

      I think going to the movies to see the just the movie stopped happening when the Episode I trailer premiered with Wing Commander.

      Who in their right mind would see that crap without having an alternative reason?

      --
      =======================================
      Doer of bad deeds, screenwriter-wannabe
      savagexp
  52. Re:Dang! I was hoping for a StarWars vs Startrek m by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

    I think you've confused Yoda and Dogbert.

    That should read, "I think you've confused Yoda with Dogbert." Unless, of course, Yoda and Dogbert read /. and were both confused.

    --

    --

    As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  53. The worst thing about movie trailers by ph1nn · · Score: 0

    The worst thing about all these movie trailers is the Quicktime... What does apple do just dump money into these companies so SOMEONE will make use of their overpriced software? Im not anti-mac, some of their stuff looks quite cool, and i would definatly run Yellow Dog if i had a nice dual G4... But my point is... there are much better compression scemes and more widely availible codecs. In short: I would love to see a divx trailer

    1. Re:The worst thing about movie trailers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yah, no kidding. I want a DVD quality 5 channel sound divx trailer. And the best thing is, divx is free. Instead, they give me a low resolution, stereo sound version that runs on a player that pops up ads to upgrade all the frigin time. Of course, pay $29.99 and you can upgrade to Quicktime Pro, where you can watch a non-DVD quality full screen version with stereo sound.

      Apple is sad. WMP is free on Macs. I would expect the same courtesy from Apple, but I guess Apple truly is a larger piece of scum than MS.

    2. Re:The worst thing about movie trailers by SirRichardPumpaloaf · · Score: 1

      I don't get this. Apple wants to show off its technology, so they license the trailer and serve it to anyone who wants to see it free of charge. What's so evil about that? If you want a DivX trailer, bitch to the DivX people. Why do you think Apple owes it to you?

  54. Re:Dang! I was hoping for a StarWars vs Startrek m by jtseng · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually the Federation has already done a strategic analysis of the military-industrial complex of the Empire.

    --

    Sanity.html - Error 404 not found

  55. Jedi Trek Of The Rings by simetra · · Score: 4, Funny

    3 countem 3 boners in one!

    Synopsis: A band of gay space gnomes, aboard the U.S.S. Fellow Ship (get it, fellow, ship, heh heh) team up with the Lucasfilm Muppets(tm) to kill the one guy on the bridge of the Enterprise which nobody knows (and hence won't miss when he dies).

    A splendid time is guaranteed for all!

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
  56. Re:What I understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL, man that made me laugh. Why? Because it's true about many of the dumbass hippys who inhabit /.

  57. I'm not excited by tomdarch · · Score: 2

    I wish I could remember the exact quote, but Tim of Spaced has some line about "death, taxes and the enevitability that the next Star Trek movie will suck." (if a true Spaced freak can help me out, it's in series one, episode 5 "Chaos" where Tim and his 'boss' are in the comic shop talking.)

  58. Release time is incorrect by ashrael · · Score: 1

    Actually the news clip says that the site and movie "Both will go live at 7:30 p.m. PDT/10:30 p.m. EDT", not 7:30pm EDT as is stated on the front page

    1. Re:Release time is incorrect by savagexp · · Score: 1

      Dude.
      My bad.

      --
      =======================================
      Doer of bad deeds, screenwriter-wannabe
      savagexp
  59. Re:Dang! I was hoping for a StarWars vs Startrek m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who would win in a fight, Batman or Superman?

  60. Re:Dang! I was hoping for a StarWars vs Startrek m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would depend on whether batman had any kryptonite in his utility belt.

  61. AHA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The plot starts to unravell!
    Like I've been telling you for years : Philip Taylor Kramer died for your sins!

    "O.J. is innocent. They did it."

  62. You're wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "you'll get at least 960x520 .. is that big enough?"

    No. I don't like having to watch a movie on a 9"x6" surface. I also don't like having to change my display resolution everytime I want to watch a movie.

    "Heck, you can just take the large trailer and drag the resize handle til it fills the whole screen!"

    Actually, you can't. At least not with the PC version. No manual resizing is available.

  63. Don't bother -- it's an even numbered sequel. by vaxer · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Legend has it that every even-numbered Star Trek sequel sucks. Let's do the math.

    1. The Motion Picture
    2. The Wrath of Khan
    3. The Search for Spock
    4. The Voyage Home
    5. The Final Frontier
    6. The Undiscovered Country
    7. Generations
    8. First Contact
    9. Insurrection
    10. Nemesis

    Worst episode ever, QED.

    1. Re:Don't bother -- it's an even numbered sequel. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it the other way around? If anything, I would say the ones you think suck are better than the ones you seem to think are good.

    2. Re:Don't bother -- it's an even numbered sequel. by savagexp · · Score: 1

      You're correct, Sir. It is the other way around; Evens are good, hence the dept. name on the post.

      Case in point:

      KAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHN! is the Greatest. Trek. Ever.

      --
      =======================================
      Doer of bad deeds, screenwriter-wannabe
      savagexp
    3. Re:Don't bother -- it's an even numbered sequel. by LMCBoy · · Score: 2

      Legend has it that every even-numbered Star Trek sequel sucks.

      You got that backwards, surely.

      No one of sound mind could rank The Search for Spock above the much-beloved Wrath of Khan.
      Or the soul-shudderingly bad The Final Frontier above... well, anything on film, Star Trek or not!?!

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    4. Re:Don't bother -- it's an even numbered sequel. by Erbo · · Score: 4, Insightful
      No, you've got it the wrong way round. Even-numbered Star Trek movies rock. Odd-numbered ones suck, or, at the very least, are kind of "ho hum."

      Let's look at the evidence:

      1. ST:TMP - Good to see the crew back again, after all these years, but a very slow movie and bo-ring in parts.
      2. The Wrath of Khan - Kick ass! Ricardo Montalban and his rich Corinthian leather, chewing the scenery and quoting Moby Dick. And tons of action.
      3. The Search for Spock - Ho hum. Nice flick, but couldn't measure up to the predecessor. And you kind of knew how it was going to turn out...
      4. The Voyage Home - Funnier than hell. They were clearly out to have fun with the whole "time travel to the present day" gag, and did. My wife likes this one the best.
      5. The Final Frontier - HEAVE! RETCH! What were they thinking? Were they thinking? Shatner couldn't direct his way out of a pay toilet, even if he had James Cameron in there to help him...
      6. The Undiscovered Country - Tight and action-filled, with lots of present-day allegory. Laid some nice groundwork for later Klingon history as depicted on TNG. And Sulu gets to be a captain; he rocks.
      7. Generations - Nice way to bridge the gap, but the story was nothing really spectacular. Gotta love the saucer-module crash scenes though.
      8. First Contact - Borg, Borg Queen, time travel, the first warp flight, "Let's rock and roll!" (Cue up "Magic Carpet Ride.") Plenty of action, plenty of good scenes. I've used this movie to test out DVD players...
      9. Insurrection - The best way I could describe this one is that it was basically like a 2-hour TNG episode. Other than that, it didn't stand out, really.
      10. Nemesis - If the pattern holds, this movie should rock. Gotta check the trailers later today and see what they look like.
      --
      Be who you are...and be it in style!
    5. Re:Don't bother -- it's an even numbered sequel. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YHBT. YHL. HAND.

    6. Re:Don't bother -- it's an even numbered sequel. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YHBT. YHL. HAND.

    7. Re:Don't bother -- it's an even numbered sequel. by Hassman · · Score: 1

      UAG

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
    8. Re:Don't bother -- it's an even numbered sequel. by Millard+Fillmore · · Score: 1

      I completely disagree with this system - it forces fans to find flaws in otherwise decent odd-numbered movies. Insurrection is by far my favorite of all the films, followed very closely by VI, and then, dare I say it, by V. It's actually really good until they go to that planet where they meet God. But, in any case, I like Insurrection because it is a 2 hour TNG episode. I liked TNG. I watched it for many many hours. That's why I pay to go see the movies. Therefore Berman et al should make movies like episodes to please me, the loyal fan. Or they can do what seems to have been done here with X and make a kick-ass action flick. I'll take that too.

    9. Re:Don't bother -- it's an even numbered sequel. by Erbo · · Score: 2
      "I like Insurrection because it is a 2 hour TNG episode."

      Well, darn it, I did, too. Since there haven't been any new TNG episodes in a while, anytime they crank out a new movie with Picard's crew, it's a Good Thing. It just wasn't as strong a movie as First Contact, IMHO, is all. There were TNG episodes I liked that weren't as strong as the strongest ones, yet they were still good episodes, just not as strong.

      There were problems with STV that started way before they went to the center of the galaxy. For instance, it looked like they were trying to shove Scotty and Uhura into a relationship, and that just doesn't make any sense to me. And don't get me started on Uhura's fandancing...

      All my opinion, of course.

      --
      Be who you are...and be it in style!
  64. Wil's on a boat now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://hometown.aol.com/cruisetrek/alaska3.html

    -- Anonymous Spudnuts

  65. HEY! I resent that remark! by Thud457 · · Score: 0

    Tom Cruise clearly stated in an interview in "Field & Stream" that Scientology cured his homosexuality.
    Not that he was gay in the first place, mind you.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:HEY! I resent that remark! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But he still likes to wrestle naked with gay porn stars.

  66. Wil Wheaton dead at 30 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is that good enough?

    1. Re:Wil Wheaton dead at 30 by FauxPasIII · · Score: 2

      Throw in the word "senseless".

      --
      25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
    2. Re:Wil Wheaton dead at 30 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's a rare one-liner that makes me laugh IRL at 1:20am

  67. Solaris Quicktime could have been gif by texchanchan · · Score: 2

    Solaris trailer: After waiting about 6 minutes to download the whole thing, in small format, I saw a few seconds of nebulous moving pictures that could have been sent as an animated GIF at a fraction of the nuisance value. Just because something CAN be done with a fancier technology, doesn't mean it OUGHTA be.

  68. If I EVER meet Ben Franklin... by Thud457 · · Score: 0

    Isn't Indiana one of the few enlightened places where they don't adhere to DST at all?

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:If I EVER meet Ben Franklin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the state doesn't follow DST at all. Some of the counties on the western border, particularly in the northwest corner close to Chiago, follow CST/CDT. And some on the eastern borden (I assume ones close to Cincinatti) follow EST/EDT.

  69. I'm Trailer Trash by DeadBugs · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It seems the Trailers are becoming more of interest than the movies. I make it a point to get to the movie on time so I don't miss the trailers. My girlfriend could not understand how I could like the "Hulk" trailer, that should next to nothing about a movie that will not be out for a year. I thought it was cool

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
    1. Re:I'm Trailer Trash by Fatal0E · · Score: 1

      I think South Park had your mindset right... the episode where they wander the neighborhood trying to find a place to watch TV so they can see the Terrance and Phillip trailer.

      All that bs for a 1 minute trailer, 45 of which are buzzwords flying across the screen, 100ms of film footage. The resemblance to this as I watched the Hulk trailer durgin AoTC was striking, to say the least.

  70. Oh, the horror! by Y-Crate · · Score: 1, Troll

    Thousands of Sonic Blue-using geeks are going to come home to watch the recorded ET only to find the superfantastical hardware recognized the trailer as a commercial and edited it out!

    Muahahhahahahahahahaha!

  71. MiB2 is a ruse... by bashibazouk · · Score: 1
    There is no movie. MiB2 is just a ruse to show you 2 hours of trailers.

    On the plus side, after those two hours, you will have seen every trailer for the foreseeable future.

  72. /. hints from Heloise: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Using glaring factual errors as the basis of your posts allows you to get the most from your trolling dollar.

  73. Re:Dang! I was hoping for a StarWars vs Startrek m by zemkai · · Score: 1
    That would depend on whether batman had any kryptonite in his utility belt.

    "Bruce... I just broke three of your ribs."

  74. Re:Screw Star Trek, the TTT teaser is coming by Ineffable+27 · · Score: 1

    Screw 'T3' - which has no involvement from James Cameron, and has no reason to exist except as a blatant cash grab, and to revive Arnie's career - the Two Towers teaser will also be playing in front of Men In Black II.

    --
    "He'd be a broader guy if he had dropped acid once." - Steve Jobs on Bill Gates
  75. Title of the next Star Trek movie by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    "The Search for Talent"

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  76. Odd or Even by philzama · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is it the Odd numbered ones that suck or even. I think it the Odd. =)

    1. Re:Odd or Even by SirRichardPumpaloaf · · Score: 1

      The rule of thumb is, if the number is divisible by one, it sucks. ;-)

  77. Prophecy in the Digital Age by FreeUser · · Score: 2
    Earlier this morning, in a post that was was (amusingly enough) moderated both as interesting and as a troll, with respect to Lucas' onging fight against the freedom of information on the internet I commented:

    But a mental note to self that "Lucas sucks (even worse than his last two films)" when Slashdot starts promoting the low-rez sorinsen quicktime tailers for Episode III might be appropriate (in the next story, if /. remains true to form) and a personal boycott of his products (past, present, and future) even more so.

    As an aside, one has to wonder what sorts of payola scams exist here, for a site the promotes free software and open source as this one does to constantly be promoting the wares of the one industry that has launched successful attacks against free software and its developers

    OK, it wasn't a Lucas Star Wars movie trailer, but rather a Star Trek trailer. Nevertheless the point remains ... slashdot continues its shameless promotion of the product of an industry that has effectively declared war against the modern internet in general, on Free Software in particular, and has successfully attacked Free Software developers for deCSS and LiViD through letigious thuggary.

    I will continue to voice my irritation at this behavior so long as the slashdot editors continue to engage in the hypocracy of denouncing the behavior of these cartels with one breath, while promoting their products shamelessly with the next.

    No slight against Star Trek or Wil intended, rather an expression of distaste of a more generalized problem.
    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    1. Re:Prophecy in the Digital Age by Keith+Russell · · Score: 2
      I will continue to voice my irritation at this behavior so long as the slashdot editors continue to engage in the hypocracy of denouncing the behavior of these cartels with one breath, while promoting their products shamelessly with the next.

      And I will continue to voice my irritation at people who pick two individuals out of a group, point out their differences of opinion, and call the group a bunch of hypocrites for disagreeing.

      If you ever see Michael or Timothy pimping a movie, feel free to come out swinging. They're the ones rallying the troops against Big Media, not Taco or Hemos.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    2. Re:Prophecy in the Digital Age by FreeUser · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      And I will continue to voice my irritation at people who pick two individuals out of a group, point out their differences of opinion, and call the group a bunch of hypocrites for disagreeing.

      I'm not referring to two posters out of a community, I'm referring to two editors working for a corporation with an editorial policy. If two members of the Free Software Foundation, the EFF, or what have you engaged in this the organization in question would be accused of hypocracy, and rightly so.

      Slashdot, as an organization, is incredibly hypocritical in their stance vis-a-vis the Entertainment Industry, and while today it may be michael and timothy rallying the troops while hemos and commander taco pimp for Hollywood, that (a) wasn't true a few short years ago when, particularly around the time the DeCSS thing first blew up and (b) isn't relevant anyway. Having a specialist in one's organization who concentrates on one aspect, and another who concentrates on the opposite, doesn't make the organization in question, in this case the Slashdot editors (and arguably, to some degree, VA, though I would't personally take things that far), any less hypocritical, or despicable, in their behavior.

      So get used to being irritated, because I'm not going away.

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    3. Re:Prophecy in the Digital Age by FreeUser · · Score: 2

      And I will continue to voice my irritation at people who pick two individuals out of a group, point out their differences of opinion, and call the group a bunch of hypocrites for disagreeing.

      If you ever see Michael or Timothy pimping a movie, feel free to come out swinging. They're the ones rallying the troops against Big Media


      You mean like THIS?

      I think my point stands rather clearly, as underscored by the actions of the very people you were defending (don't blame yourself, it is their fault for being hypocrits, not yours).

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  78. Re:Dang! I was hoping for a StarWars vs Startrek m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy Sheep Shit, Batman! Superman looks better in tights than you do!

  79. Spoilers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So did they show the part where Data dies?

    He gets replaced with another android (one built by the Romulans, that he reprogramed) at the end of the movie. Other than that (and the clone of Picard), the movie sucked.

    The fight scene between the giant Romulan ship and the Enterprise was kind of cool though (although having Data jump across space between the two ships was kind of silly).

  80. Re:Dang! I was hoping for a StarWars vs Startrek m by Guppy06 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think what we're really all waiting for is the (anti-)climatic conflict between Storm Troopers (who can't shoot) and red shirts (who must die).

  81. Re:Dang! I was hoping for a StarWars vs Startrek m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ugh. I hate these. I'm sorry, but Star Trek Technology is far beyond Star Wars. Holodecks, PHasers, /real/ cloaking devices, Sheilding (come on, puting you shield generators on the /outside/ of your ship? wtf?!) Warp drive, are all much more advanced in the ST universe. Big deal, their ships are large but the can't take a pounding, The much smaller Rebel Fleet beat the majority of the Imperials at the Battle fo Endor, they are a bunch of wimps. "oooooh they're big!" BFD!

  82. sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd rather have a free bottle in front of me than a pre-frontal lobotomy.

    Rolls off the tongue a bit better.

  83. Re:Dang! I was hoping for a StarWars vs Startrek m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Already tried that, failed. Having a 'life' is only for the rich, the good looking, and the drug-centric clubbing types apparently.
    2. Nope. Part 1 applies.
    3. Yes, it is, and its far more attractive to me than this pitiful existence we have today. I'm sure most people, here, would agree at least a little. Otherwise, ST would have no appeal.

  84. Re:EST eh? In Indiana! by swfranklin · · Score: 1
    given that the US is on Daylight Savings time

    Here in Indiana, we are quite solidly on EST year-round. Apparently it would confuse the cows to use Daylight Savings.

  85. forget deanna by _avs_007 · · Score: 1

    How about 7 of 9 from Voyager?

  86. Re:Dang! I was hoping for a StarWars vs Startrek m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree, however the Enterprise is also a pretty big fucking ship (remember when they were walking on the hull in "First Contact"). I'd bet that its as large as a small Star Destroyer (ie. Victory class).

  87. Oh yeah? by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    You should hope that would not happen. What in the Star Trek universe could possible compete with Yoda using The Force? That's right.... Wesley Crusher!!

  88. Re:Dang! I was hoping for a StarWars vs Startrek m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see a koan-like paradox in the making here.

  89. Enterprise... by OneFix · · Score: 2

    Since Enterprise is on UPN tonight at 8:00 (only half-hour following the "premiere", I'ld expect to be able to catch it a few times tonight...

    So, you only need to catch it on ET if you absolutely must see it @7:30 rather than @8:00 or if you are one of those unlucky few without a UPN station.

    1. Re:Enterprise... by ShavenYak · · Score: 2

      So, you only need to catch it on ET if you absolutely must see it @7:30 rather than @8:00 or if you are one of those unlucky few without a UPN station.

      Or, if you don't want to watch the rerun of Enterprise. Unless it's one of the 2 or 3 I missed, I'm skipping it. Please, let the new season start soon!

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
  90. Re:Dang! I was hoping for a StarWars vs Startrek m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Q: Blinks Yoda into nothingness.

  91. Yes they are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They must be on crack, because you haven't gotten "Flamebait," "Offtopic," or "Troll" yet.

  92. Preview-itis by smagruder · · Score: 2

    Of course, we'll see 2/3 of the trailer in the multitude of peek-ahead snips that ET will show before actually showing 9/10 of the whole thing at the end of their show. This freaked-up show is so full of fluff, I have to wonder if they spend any more than 5 minutes preparing the actual content.

    --
    Steve Magruder, Metro Foodist
  93. Think about Data for a minute... by Vought+28 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    In reality, Data is just a machine. Yet he is considered to be on the same level as a human, and afforded the same rights as we are. This lowers humanity to the level of the machines we create. When machines are on an equal footing with the rest of us, you can bet that your rights will be quite limited.

    1. Re:Think about Data for a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a biological machine that your parents created, what's the difference?

    2. Re:Think about Data for a minute... by Vought+28 · · Score: 1

      That is an interesting point, but...Two parents do not create anything. Here's why. The human body is actually very simple. It is a basic organism, with very few mysteries remaining, outside the brain. The reproductive cells, however, are a different matter. They are a high level, very complex set of systems that scientists cannot duplicate. As a matter of fact, it looks like the human body is nothing more than a vehicle to carry around our reproductive cells so that they can re-create themselves. Only the universe can create life, so far at least.

  94. To boldly go... by Cloud+K · · Score: 1

    And collect my pension.

    Just like the original series cast were during the later Star Trek movies... aren't they getting a bit old for this sort of thing? :)

  95. Er, 7:30pm PACIFIC... by Demerzel · · Score: 1

    Quoth startrek.com:

    "online debut at 7:30 p.m. PDT/10:30 p.m. EDT"

  96. Nemesis by jkd · · Score: 1

    Thats 7:30 Pacific 10:30 Eastern

  97. Re:Dang! I was hoping for a StarWars vs Startrek m by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

    A lot of it is, but not all of it. Their droid and computer technology seem to be pretty much on par -- though there are significantly different societal attitudes towards droids.

    But the biggie is the hyperdrive. SW ships routinely cross the galaxy in very short periods of time... I'd think somewhere in the neighborhood of a few days. (there's a map floating around on the web -- it indicates that Tatooine is near the edge of the galaxy, while Coruscant is on the opposite side of the galactic core. This corresponds to the mention of Tatooine as being in 'the outer rim' and Coruscant impliedly being central, like Trantor) A journey like that for a Federation ship would take generations, which was the basis for ST Voyager.

    Similarly, there are some differences in weaponry -- a Death Star superlaser has destructive potential unrivalled by anything in ST besides the Planet Eater, or possibly the Borg. The Federation might try building an antimatter bomb to achieve the same effect, but that's rather crude compared to a beam weapon.

    Christ I'm a pathetic geek. ;)

    --
    -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  98. Oh well... by Kiaser+Zohsay · · Score: 2

    Here in the heart of East Coast USA, the Wednesday edition of ET has come and gone, and no sign of the trailer. I guess I'll just have to wait til tomorrow morning when I'm back at work with my big fat pipe....

    --
    I am not your blowing wind, I am the lightning.
  99. Trailer's up if you can't wait until 7:30 PM PT... by koganuts · · Score: 3, Informative

    Right... here.

  100. man this is sad by lingqi · · Score: 2, Funny

    I am staying in the office waiting for the Star Trek trailer, on the excuse that
    1) 7pm the carpool is lifted, and
    2) it's only a "half hour" wait, and
    3) office connection is about 1.8x that of the DSL at home.

    i am so glad there is no "pathetic loser" mod.

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

    1. Re:man this is sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You hung around to save 5 minutes on a 20MB download. Only 80% more speed?

      You're right, you do suck.

  101. correction! it's 10:30 EST... by tkny · · Score: 1

    just when i wanted to get a whiff of the new trailer.... it says it's 7:30 PDT. not EST. owowowow!

    1. Re:correction! it's 10:30 EST... by SWTP · · Score: 1

      Does not really matter since "Its dead Jim!" ;)

      At least Lucas spent the money for a more robust site.

    2. Re:correction! it's 10:30 EST... by SWTP · · Score: 1

      Its alive!

  102. Hum by SWTP · · Score: 1

    Hum.

    Intersting site guys! Looks like a early 21 century error message comming from an ancient Apache server saying Frobidden.

    Cool. Data is blue screen and the site is Forbidden!

  103. where is it? by gbooker · · Score: 1

    I find it amusing that they use IIS for their main web site, but when they need bandwidth, they use apache. Interesting revelation here.

    BTW, it is still forbidden. Guess they are not going to let us see the trailer after all.

    --
    You see? It's like I've always said. You can get more with a kind word and a 2x4 than you can with just a kind word.
    1. Re:where is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They? If you're refering to Apple, they are using OS X Server with Apache on 100 percent of their servers. Apple have never used Windows on their servers, thus they have never used IIS on their servers.

  104. Other site by Optikal · · Score: 2, Informative

    I get a 403 Forbidden when trying to get to nemesis.startrek.com (The official site). I'm sure I'm not the only one. The trailer wasn't officially up at Apple's QuickTime trailers site, but I did find it nonetheless with common sense.

    It can be found here http://www.apple.com/trailers/paramount/star_trek_ nemesis/

  105. That was amazing! by HorizonXP · · Score: 1

    OH MY!!! What a great trailer! The Even-Odd Theory holds true! It's going to be PURE action-packed! WOO!

  106. Here is the Apple/QuickTime link by SoftwareJedi · · Score: 1
  107. It's official up at Apple... by koganuts · · Score: 1

    Right... here.

  108. Doesn't allow saving? by gbooker · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, I got the full screen version, and it said that it doesn't allow saving. So... I did a get info on the movie, and lo and behold, there is an entry called source which is a URL. I typed this into wget, and it is downloading. For those who want to save it, here is the akamai URL:

    http://a1536.g.akamai.net/5/1536/51/979a9ce9df5cda / a1a1aaa2198c627970773d80669d84574a8d80d3cb12453c02 589f25382f668c9329e0375e81787e85abb28970c7aee1d900 465d736aa1c81ec4bb91e8bf063cc3f6ed037/star_trek_ne mesis_fs.l.mov.

    Enjoy. BTW, if this goes 404, just follow the procedure that I use listed above.

    --
    You see? It's like I've always said. You can get more with a kind word and a 2x4 than you can with just a kind word.
    1. Re:Doesn't allow saving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /me is downloading from it at ~100k a second.

      Thank you very much, my good man.

    2. Re:Doesn't allow saving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks to the URL. What version of QT are you using? I am using the Windows version 5.0.2. When I do a Show Movie Info, it only shows part of the URL ( a truncated URL) under the Source Field. How did you get it to show the entire URL?

    3. Re:Doesn't allow saving? by gbooker · · Score: 2

      I am using QT 6 Public Preview. I just did a get info, and it showed the whole thing. I guess it is a QT6 thing then.

      --
      You see? It's like I've always said. You can get more with a kind word and a 2x4 than you can with just a kind word.
  109. Akamai Direct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    1. Re:Akamai Direct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting... My QT4 played it just fine once downloaded... and I didn't have to buy a thing or install the spyware ridden QT5.

      Neat trailer... doesn't give much up on the story at all. In fact, I am left wondering what the movie is all about really. Neat special effects and then some, but I don't know a thing about the movie or if I want to see it after seeing this trailer.

    2. Re:Akamai Direct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...spyware ridden QT5."

      What are you talking about?

      A search of Google finds nothing relating QuickTime with spyware, and I haven't heard anyone mention spyware in QT5 before. Considering QT5 has been out well over a year, I'm finding it very odd the first mention I've heard of it containing spyware was an fullshit AC troll on Slashdot.

      Take the tinfoil hat off, child.

  110. CGI by plasticpixel · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... very cool. Loved the trailer. The CGI shots still look pretty 'beta' to me. But I guess they have another five months to work on it. At the same time, I love to see the early stuff. Its nice to see the work in process sometimes.

  111. Fullscreen QuickTime link! by koganuts · · Score: 1

    Right... here.

    At 20.8MB, I'm really impressed with the quality of the compression.

  112. Re:Dang! I was hoping for a StarWars vs Startrek m by Noodlenose · · Score: 1
    ....Similarly, there are some differences in weaponry -- a Death Star superlaser has destructive potential unrivalled by anything in ST besides the Planet Eater, or possibly the Borg.

    wasn't the Planeteater from Babylon 5?

    Dirk

  113. Borg do not scale... by tlambert · · Score: 1

    "What made them stand out was their communal decemtralized mind."

    Yes, but then you have to factor in locking overhead, and distributed cache coherency. After you've done that, the entire Borg collective is about as intelligent as Congress.

    Which kind of explains why individual humans have always been able to outsmart them.

    -- Terry

  114. Re:Dang! I was hoping for a StarWars vs Startrek m by Stackster · · Score: 1

    But the biggie is the hyperdrive. SW ships routinely cross the galaxy in very short periods of time...
    [snip]
    A journey like that for a Federation ship would take generations


    Well, SW _is_ set in a galaxy far far away. Might be a galaxy that is just a bit smaller? In AotC, I think they mention stuff about "thousands of worlds" here and there. Not millions. Which could mean there aren't millions of worlds.

    --

    There are 010 kinds of people. Those who understand octal, those who don't, and 06 other kinds of morons.
  115. saw trailer on Entertainment Tonight by wessman · · Score: 1

    Saw the Nemeis trailer on ET last night and it looked outstanding. I still haven't seen the last ST:TNG movie, but "First Contact" is one of my favorite sfi-fi movies.

    Also downloaded the lastest Lord of the Rings: Two Towers trailers and it looks to be even better than the first.

    Damn I love quality sci-fi/fantasy movies!

  116. ok even I'll admit by themexican · · Score: 1

    the trailer looks pretty decent. That said I'm still mych more pyched to see the T3 teaser. Cameron or no Cameron, arnie vs a terminatrix is going to be a good time. Cameron is a god but what has he done lately other than sit in his castle bitching about Titanic.

  117. StarWars vs Startrek Episode 2 mooV by phatStrat · · Score: 1

    Scene:

    Picard: Fire photon torpedo's again!
    Yoda: Diverts stray apostrophes with a wave of his paw.

  118. Re:Dang! I was hoping for a StarWars vs Startrek m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The computer and droid technology in ST is far beyond that in SW. Comparing C3PO to Data it is absolutely clear that ST has the higher tech.

    Hyperdrive has got to be only near or at the speed of light. Remember when Han warned that without precise calculations you could run into a star. If you were travelling many times the speed of light shouldn't you not have to worry about that since you could pass through a star unharmed?

    Soren destroyed a star in ST:Generations. You don't see anyone destroying stars in SW.

  119. Re:Dang! I was hoping for a StarWars vs Startrek m by Joe+Mucchiello · · Score: 1

    They'll find a way to die:

    Red Shirt: I'm not hit! (Leaps up and down) I'm not hit! (Lands funny, twists angle, breaks his skull open on a rock.)

  120. Why does the Nemesis Page by biggerboy · · Score: 1

    Look like a Journey album cover? Is Journey going to be on the soundtrack?!

  121. Huh?? by effer · · Score: 1

    Why does one of the fade screens look like it says "Anal Journey"? It actually says "Final Journey", but any designer should spot the font's effect in a flash like that! Good yucks!

  122. Re:Dang! I was hoping for a StarWars vs Startrek m by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

    The Planet Eater was an apparently automated ship in the original Trek episode "The Doomsday Machine." It looked kind of like an empty ice cream cone. It broke apart planets, and the bits went into the open end and were destroyed, probably converted into fuel.

    Naturally, Kirk and co. manage to blow it up. ;)

    --
    -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  123. Re:Dang! I was hoping for a StarWars vs Startrek m by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

    Good point re: the stars... though Toren's origins leave open the possibility of having more advanced knowledge than mainstream Federation science. After all, he was the only one who could build the trilithium stellar probes, and certainly the Romulans never would've passed along that kind of technology to Klingon rebels if they'd known what it could be used for.

    So I don't think it especially counts for much, kind of like the Tox Uthat from the 27th century (which could remotely turn off stellar nuclear fusion).

    As for your other assertions, they're just crap.

    Data the only non-homicidal legitimately intelligent artificial life form that's lasted more than a single episode to date. SW droid technology is commonplace. Sanity is a solved problem (no Nomads, V'Ger's, or M5's there), which counts for a lot, and they seem to be just as capable of intelligence, emotion, etc. There are different social issues -- droids are thought of as property and seem to have a slave mentality, and no one really pays much attention to them (which leads me to suspect that their technology has gotten sufficiently advanced that very few non-droids know how everything works. Witness the hyperdrive repair efforts in ESB). But they're hardly a nearly-unique product of mad science, as Data is.

    Ditto for hyperdrives -- it's just a plot device, so the mechanics don't really tell us anything interesting. Just because 'precise calculations are required' doesn't mean that it's not faster. The _distances_ traveled and the time it takes are how we know its faster.

    (and besides which, ST ships with warp drives can travel many many times faster than c, but still can't safely drive into/through stars, black holes, etc.)

    Again of course, this is probably one of the more pathetic debates /. has ever been witness to.

    --
    -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.