John cleese. was orginally John Cheese
His father changed the familiy name.
James Bland mostly suxs. The franchises only saving grace was the gagets and Q.
Re:Who's replaced Q?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Cleese no longer R. he is now head of Q branch and approprietly, Q
Arrr, any joke involvin a pirate can nay be bad. I will keel-haul ye who buh-live othervise.
Ye have made me irate
YARRRRRRGGGGHHHHHH!
Re:Who's replaced Q?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Considering that "Q" was the official abbreviation of Quartermaster (the title of the equipment supplier from the book) The part played by John Cleese IS STILL Q.
I'd be much more interested in the Friction behind Bond's women. Or in front of them. Or underneath them. Or anywhere there's a good spot to rub up against.
Ford owns Astin Martin, and that's nice, but doesn't anyone agree that the Thunderbird looks horribly disfigured? Definitely one of the ugliest cars I've ever seen.
And as far as gadgets go, I'll never be rich, I'll just have lots and lots of toys.:)
now there's a poll for which you can't have enough options...
Seriously, apart from rocket shooting cars, I've found most Bond accesoires rather dumb. A laser wristwatch strong enough to burn your way into a steel safe ? Com'on, we're geeks, but even those don't believe everything !
I'm with you on that one. Not only are the gadgets themselves pretty dumb, but the applications of the gadgets are insanely limited. Yet, stragely enough, Bond finds himself in the exact situation where that gadget can come into play.
The BMW that you can drive from a little control pad? For all those times you need to hide in the back seat and control the car, duh. Why are you able to get into the back seat but not the front seat? Ummm...hhmmmm...
That could be useful if it was cold outside. You could use the remote to start it up early and get warmed up, then drive it right up to the front door...
Re:Poll
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
assuming of course that you have a window or something near the front door, so you can see where you're driving it. Well, a window or a big hole where you accidentally shot one of the missiles by pressing the button you thought was the accelerator.
~CODEmage~
Re:Poll
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
There was a video image on the screen of the phone I thought.
i heard/read somewhere that for the original Mission:Impossible series (not the 90's version show or the Cruise vehicles), they strived to use only those gadgets that were realistically possible at that time.
Depending on the range with which the control pad works, it could be immensely useful. You could drive up to the front of a restaurant and then find a park space from the comfort of your table(what would be more suave than permanent valet?) How about using it to drive the car into places unfit for humans, like Chernobyl or New Jersey? With the structural changes that were made to the vehicle, you could use it as a battering ram without worrying about whiplash. There's plenty of uses for a remote controlled car, the movie just failed to show them.
However, I will admit that there is one flub that has always bothered me. After all of the situations where these gadgets have saved Bond's life, how come he isn't carrying it again in the next film? I recognize that the inflatable ski jacket was a one trick pony, but there's been plenty of times he could have used the wristwatch garrote, x-ray camera with built in laser, or plastique toothpaste, but Q just decided to deprive him of these useful tools.
Um - yea. Realistic masks that mimic every facial movement but can be ripped off at will. Helicopters that can be towed behind a high speed train through a tunnel without the turbulence causing it to crash. Yeah, Mission Impossible was a barrel of realism.
I also heard a rumor that all of the McGyver gadgets/contrived solutions were tested for feasability before being used on the show. Don't know if that's true either, but I am rather skeptical about that "gate" thingy he uses to instantly travel to other worlds.
--
Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
I've never heard that, but everything seemed pretty feasable to me, I'm curious about the egg-radiator-patch thing though. I'd assume it would just muck up and swirl around rather than actually going to the hole, but I could be wrong. I don't know what you mean about the gate thingy, I havn't seen all the episodes. (Does it still air in the US? What station, time?)
The original series did have masks as in the movie. But yea, I had a brain fart and started thinking about the movie. (Although the first one wasn't as horrid as that John Woo versions)
I heard the same thing too. Although when making the bombs on the show, they always left out some key ingredient so it wouldn't be as easy for idiots to make similar bombs. Anybody intelligent enough to figure out what was left out is probably smart enough to make a better explosive anyways.
The egg, in theory, should work. Since the radiator fluid is quite hot it will immediately hard boil the egg. Since there is pressure in the radiator it will push the egg "chunks" to the cracks/holes therein filling them in. There are 2 problems with this, however, one being once the holes are plugged the pressure will increase to ~15psi which is probably enough to blow the egg chunks out through the holes (anyone make the mistake of pulling a radiator cap off a hot engine?)... The second problem is that of the heater core. If the heater was on it would be instantly rendered useless. In all actuality, if you tried this "at home" you'd probably completely plug the radiator and the heater core and possibly the coolant ducts within the engine. Causing an even greater problem of over heating the engine. In otherwords "don't try this at home" unless you're rich and have nothing better to do...
That's why I totally can't stand the Roger Moore films - it's always the gadget that saves him. And Brosnan seems to be going the same way.
The Sean Connery films, the gadgets were very much a side issue, never a life-saver. That's where Timothy Dalton scored - him and Sean Connery were the only Bonds prepared to get into a proper fight. Shame the Dalton films were done so averagely though - the whole thing was just recovering from the damage done by Moore. Dalton prepped the franchise to get serious for Brosnan.
Still can't stand Brosnan as Bond though.
Grab.
It's that time again.......
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0, Troll
1. Make gadgets 2. Sell them to 007 3. Profit!
Re:It's that time again.......
by
rowanxmas
·
· Score: 0, Offtopic
No, no, no, no, its:
1. Steal Underpants
2. ????
3. Profit!
Re:It's that time again.......
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
You're both wrong!
1. Make gadgets
2. Program gadgets to steal underpants (i.e. Go go gadget tighty-whities!)
3. ????
4. Profit!
Re:It's that time again.......
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Yes, we are well aware of the origins of the joke. (It's South Park for those who don't know)
I'm not a huge fan of Brosnan as Bond, but one of the few high notes of his 007 career is the glee on his face while operating the BMW from the rear seat using his phone as a controller.
Too bad there's probably too much concrete in that garage to get a decent cell signal. Could be Bluetooth in addition to cell, neh?
I don't recommend that as an option in newer cars: I've seen how my kids drive on the PlayStation.
-- Design for Use, not Construction!
Screw James Bonde's Gadgets
by
garoush
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
While Bonde may have the coolest gadgets of them all, the best are those used in the movie: "The Sum of All Fears" where our hero's c-phone and PDA just keeps on working fine in the middle of a radioactive explosion. Can Bonde beat that? I think not -- he is British not an American. Go figure.
--
Karma stuck at 50? Add 2-5 inches.. err.. 2-5x Karmas Count to your pen1es.. err.. Karma all naturally and private
Re:Screw James Bonde's Gadgets
by
Rude+Turnip
·
· Score: 1
I think Ben Affleck was in the part of Baltimore that was near the outskirts of the radius of the nuke that went off in the stadium. So, his wireless device might have had a chance. Sorry if I ruined it for anyone that didn't see the movie yet...it was a shitty movie anyway.
Re:Screw James Bonde's Gadgets
by
GeckoX
·
· Score: 1
Good point about "The Sum of All Fears", I hadn't noticed. Likely because that whole movie sucked dog so bad that by that point I was just wishing it was over. What's up with Ben and Morgan anyways lately, first changing lanes and then that crap? 2 great actors, 2 pathetic excuses for movies in a row...go figure!
-- No Comment.
Re:Screw James Bonde's Gadgets
by
PD
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
Where was the bomb detonated? At ground level? I would expect a lot of things to keep working in that case.
EMP pulses are generated by high altitude bursts that send a shitload of charged particles into the ionosphere. That gob of electrons in the upper atmosphere is what generates the EMP pulse.
Re:Screw James Bonde's Gadgets
by
joshsisk
·
· Score: 1
Morgan Freeman was in Changing Lanes? I didn't see it, but I thought it was Sam Jackson.
Re:Screw James Bonde's Gadgets
by
c.derby
·
· Score: 1
um, "changing lanes" was afleck and jackson, not freeman.
-- -- derby
Re:Screw James Bonde's Gadgets
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
I'm sure he could beat your spelling though
B-O-N-D
What's with the freakin' e!?
Re:Screw James Bonde's Gadgets
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Who would have guessed anyway? Niggers all look alike.
Re:Screw James Bonde's Gadgets
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
he is British not an American
uh, so he's smart, witty and attractive but doesn't have EMP proof gadgets?
boohoo. usa^H^Hk uk!
Re:Screw James Bonde's Gadgets
by
nickclarke
·
· Score: 0, Troll
For a start it's Bond, not Bonde.
Can Bonde beat that? I think not -- he is British not an American. Go figure.
That'll be why you Americans release poor imitation movies such as xXx then.
Re:Screw James Bonde's Gadgets
by
GeckoX
·
· Score: 1
Shit, yer right. Must have been even worse than I thought!
-- No Comment.
Re:Screw James Bonde's Gadgets
by
boy_afraid
·
· Score: 1
And I guess all CRACKERS look alike with the mullet?
And how much does the companies pays?
by
ccollao
·
· Score: 1, Interesting
I wonder how much does companies like Nokia, Rolex or BMW pays to be the official modified gadget for Spy Agents. Must be a great money to sell, in a single movie, and being a great shuttle for the new models/equipments.
CCV.
Re:And how much does the companies pays?
by
henele
·
· Score: 1
I read with Minority Report a big bunch of the budget (around the salary of Mr. Cruise, or the whole budget minus Cruise, either way lots of moolar:) ) was paid by Nokia and Co.
However things are complicated when adverts for the products come out full of material from the film (which over here in the UK is happening) - at that point I guess they might start becomming even..
Re:And how much does the companies pays?
by
nickclarke
·
· Score: 1
Both the Z3 in Goldeneye and the Z8 in The World is not Enough were used to launch the new models for BMW. The first Aston in Goldfinger caused sales of the DB5 to rocket. Product placement works, and dosen't have to be in-your-face.
Re:And how much does the companies pays?
by
realgone
·
· Score: 2
There was a story on BBC over the weekend reporting that the new Bond flick earned a record $70 million from product placement fees (mainly for the gadgets, cars, etc) -- the highest ever for a motion picture. They make no bones about the film pretty much being 2-hour advertisement.
Re:And how much does the companies pays?
by
billn
·
· Score: 2
This go around it's Norelco, Philips, Ericcson, and.. dun dun dun.. Aston Martin. =)
I'm a spoiling bitch, I know, but my name is in the credits, too, so what do I care? =)
-- - billn
If they could come up with...
by
DalTech
·
· Score: 2, Funny
If they could only come up with a gadget to make the IRS lose my tax records.
Re:If they could come up with...
by
Weaselmancer
·
· Score: 2, Funny
Guys, how about a... du dum briefcase with knives in it? (From Russia w/Luv). In the old days it didn't take too much to be a gadget.
if i had a care like bond's
by
r0xah
·
· Score: 2, Funny
With a car like Bond's I could get layed and be a/. junkie.
-- those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do. -isaac asimov
Re:if i had a care like bond's
by
Hamstaus
·
· Score: 1
With a car like Bond's I could get layed and be a/. junkie.
Sorry, I'd have to suspend my belief way too far for those two things to be true. Remote-control BMW? Sure./. junkie + layed? Not even in the movies.:)
-- I moderate "-1, Fool"
Re:if i had a care like bond's
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
With a car like Bond's I could get layed and be a/. junkie.
No, you'd just be a loser with a cool car.
Re:if i had a care like bond's
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
The rest of use doing both anyway with out the car.:)
Re:if i had a care like bond's
by
mmol_6453
·
· Score: 2
Actually, Milo (in Antitrust) was involved in several obviously sexual scenes.
It'd be a cool life experience, if NURV wasn't killing people and trying to exploit me...
-- What's this Submit thingy do?
Re:if i had a care like bond's
by
McFly69
·
· Score: 5, Funny
I have a BMW.... and trust me it does not help. Once a nerd, always a nerd.
--
NO! NO! Please don't mod me, I'm too young to die a troll. *click* Oh the pain, the pain...
Re:if i had a care like bond's
by
Banjonardo
·
· Score: 2
What you need is a cool vanity plate. I saw an early 90s 5-series today with the plate:
DAS BIMMER
--
-----
Score 3? For what? Being wrong, at length? - smirkleton
Minus minus makes plus, errhh...
by
infolib
·
· Score: 4, Funny
Now if you're the type who can't help un-suspending your disbelief
I am not able to flatly deny that I couldn't be the type of person that isn't completely excluded from that set of people. Are you?
-- Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
the DeLorean was kind of esighned by the same guy, and after the Lotus stuff.
-- Life's a bitch, then she kills you.
Not in my world
by
joebagodonuts
·
· Score: 5, Funny
"The girls, you could argue, are just a distraction in James Bond films."
-- "Give a woman two glasses of wine and some pad thai, and they'll agree to just about anything." the Sports Guy
Re:Not in my world
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
The sentence is correct, he just misspelled plot (it doesn't start with a "g")
IN SOVIET RUSSIA
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Bond Is Fiction.
The interviewee doesn't get it
by
DougJohnson
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
A big part of this article is how the movie "Just doesn't get it" which is of course the biggest load.
Of course the movie gets it. What the commenter doesn't get is that the movie is about fantasy. It's not trying to be a realistic portrayal of life as a spy, it's about selling copies, giving kids a fantastical role model, and being down right entertaining. everyone (well, men) want to be Bond at some point of Bonds career or another, loads of people mimic Bond's speach. I'd say that Hollywood gets it
Re:The interviewee doesn't get it
by
rowanxmas
·
· Score: 1
everyone (well, men) want to be Bond at some point
The points he is referring to are when Bond is having sex with HOT girls.
Re:The interviewee doesn't get it
by
CromeDome
·
· Score: 1
Exactly right:) The point isn't to make some super-accurate spy film, it's to show off some fancy gadgets, sleep with as many hot women as possible, and whack some bad guys. A very simple, entertaining, and successful formula. What's there not to get?
Re:The interviewee doesn't get it
by
Tet
·
· Score: 2
What the commenter doesn't get is that the movie is about fantasy. It's not trying to be a realistic portrayal of life as a spy, it's about selling copies, giving kids a fantastical role model, and being down right entertaining.
But that's the point. In a case of perfect timing,
I've just got back to the office having come from
seeing "Die another day", and here I find a Slashdot
article about it. My biggest complaint about the
film is that the gadgets (and the stunts) are
just *too* unrealistic, and yes, that does spoil
the entertainment factor of the whole film. Sure,
I enjoyed it, but I would have enjoyed it more if
I hadn't been sitting there imagining some
clueless creative type saying "it would be really
cool if Bond did this, or had that gadget". I can
suspend belief for a film as much as anyone, but
they're just pushing it too far nowadays. Oh, and
the theme tune was a big let down, too. Definitely
not in the same category as Bond films of
yesteryear. Don't get me wrong, it's a decent
film, and worth seeing, but I just think it could
have been much better with a little more attention
to detail, and a little less sensationalism.
-- "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
Re:The interviewee doesn't get it
by
Matey-O
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
Oh, and the theme tune was a big let down, too. Definitely not in the same category as Bond films of yesteryear. Don't get me wrong, it's a decent film, and worth seeing
Have you seen many Bond films in the theatre in the past? a BUNCH of them left me with that 'eh, it was okay entertainment' aftertaste. Bond is the perfect 70% demographic franchise. Since it doesn't aleniate by being too intelligent, nor too stupid, it makes a ton of money.
That said, I want his car...
...any of 'em.
-- "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
Re:The interviewee doesn't get it
by
Doppleganger
·
· Score: 4, Funny
I half agree with the artical. While I like the gadgets. Some of the gadgets that only have a very particular use can be a bit silly. And the special effects do seem to be taking away part of the Macgiver (don't hassle my spelling please) appeal of the movies (than being the use of a bit of intelligence as entertainment, rather than things blowing up).
Re:The interviewee doesn't get it
by
artificial-intellect
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
It's not trying to be a realistic portrayal of life as a spy
Well, in fact Bond was never meant to be a spy. He was a secret agent, which is a completely different profession, licence to kill et al.
In fact Bond only performed proper espionage on one occasion, where he had to obtain a file (can't for the life of me remember which one).
Re:The interviewee doesn't get it
by
Matey-O
·
· Score: 2
Ya, sure, especially if I can salvage the laser Hub-caps.
Besides, how many cars HASN'T he wrecked?/me thinks about the Z8 in the last flick.
-- "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
Re:The interviewee doesn't get it
by
The+J+Kid
·
· Score: 1
I'd say that Hollywood gets it
You'd be right, as RMS has just released a note in which he states:
"Hollywood gets it"
He also said something about GNU/Linux use in FX so it should've been GNU/Hollywood, but that's trivial.
Re:The interviewee doesn't get it
by
RealUlli
·
· Score: 1
There was some Z3...;-)
Cheers!
-- Simple things should be simple, complex things should be possible.
I don't think he gets it....
by
95_gst_al
·
· Score: 5, Funny
"The movies just don't get it," Melton says. "A spy wants the fewest gadgets possible. Because being caught with a gadget is a death warrant.... There is no real-world counterpart to a car that shoots with machine guns." Real spies carry as little technology as possible, and draw as little attention to themselves as possible -- hardly 007's style. "The world of James Bond is fiction. Bond wouldn't last 4 minutes as a real spy."
Like I want to watch a guy running around with microcamera and a pen copying machine stealing important documents and taking photos for 1.5 hours.
-- When all else fails, piss on it. At least you will feel better in some kind of way.
Art Imitating Life
by
pennsol
·
· Score: 5, Interesting
"In that sense, the problem facing Bond filmmakers is similar to the problem faced by software companies, cell phone carriers, and other high-tech firms, who seem to only offer barely noticeable incremental improvements to technologies their consumers already have, rather than radical new products. In this sense, art is imitating life -- or at least the Nasdaq."
At This point, And it's been said here on/. many times.. What is left for the younger generations to invent.. it seems that the more the tech sector grows..the less the "real" or "radical" inventions come to be a reality.. or it could just be me...
What is left for the younger generations to invent
Oh, I don't know.....
Maybe the tech sector can invent the self drying jacket used in Back to the Future II. I'm going to need it in about an hour when I go out to my car, in the rain, for which I forgot to bring my umbrella today.
It just seems like we aren't inventing stuff as quickly as in the past because we can't step back and see the long term view. When I think of everything that has happened technologically in my lifetime, I'm amazed : personal computers, cloning, the internet, the list goes on...
To many times have I left needing a jacket on a big walk, only to find I get too hot. Carrying it is pain. Even if it's raining, it can still get hot inside.
Re:Art Imitating Life
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Hehe. Yeah right.
Perhaps it's more accurate to say that our generation is running into a creative slump, and those few who aren't are drowned by the superfluous noise of the digitally over-communicative masses.
Such as you:)
Re:Art Imitating Life
by
drinkypoo
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
The best part of the future is that it is unknown. You don't know what is left to invent because it hasn't happened yet. Who knew that the transistor would be invented? How about the generation and use of electricity? (A nod of the head must be given to Tesla here for AC power. Thank you.) And way back when, the generation and use of fire was just as revolutionary.
One can always hope that the next thing invented will be something revolutionary rather than evolutionary; It does happen now and then, usually by accident or semi-accident. After all, you can't step in the pile of shit and find the ring unless your bare feet are dancing 'midst the cow-pies.
-- "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
And how does pumping a bit of air through a set of tubes destroy the ozone layer? Not all air conditioners have to use gas/refigorator type set-ups. For a jacket, simply pumping air through would do the trick.
First two lines of the article....
by
M.C.+Hampster
·
· Score: 5, Funny
The girls, you could argue, are just a distraction in James Bond films. The gadgets are the real stars, and time and time again, they save Bond's skin.
Obviously written by a Nerd.
-- Forget the whales - save the babies.
Re:First two lines of the article....
by
voidware
·
· Score: 1
Obviously a nerd would mod this "insightful."
Brandon
Re:First two lines of the article....
by
racerx509
·
· Score: 1
The girls, you could argue, are just a distraction in James Bond films. The gadgets are the real stars, and time and time again, they save Bond's skin.
"Obviously written by a Nerd."
Not any of the nerds here. Obviously written by a homosexual is more like it.
Re:First two lines of the article....
by
Guppy06
·
· Score: 2
"The girls, you could argue, are just a distraction in James Bond films. The gadgets are the real stars, and time and time again, they save Bond's skin."
Yes, but it's the girls that make having skin all the more worthwhile...:)
I want to know what he uses in his hair.
by
Prince_Ali
·
· Score: 4, Funny
What does he use to keep his hair so tidy? He can be shot at roughly 40 times, jump on a bike, and jump onto a train without messing up his hair the slightest bit.
Re:I want to know what he uses in his hair.
by
Kong+the+Medium
·
· Score: 2, Informative
Q had fabricated this extremly useful hair gel. And if u mix it with your aftershave, guess what, instant C4.
-- ... whenever a text is transmitted, variation occurs. This is because human beings are careless, fallible, and occasiona
Re:I want to know what he uses in his hair.
by
ccollao
·
· Score: 0
That's why Timothy Dalton was kicked out as James Bond after his first movie, his hair was easily messed up by the wind of gunshots.
Re:I want to know what he uses in his hair.
by
sapgau
·
· Score: 1
Obviously is the secret formula in his Dippity-Do! gel.
Resists heat, wind, dust and harsh uv rays. Of course each double-0 agent has his own special formula. The Mega-hold formula is to be used carefuly because his hair may become hard as nails, something you don't want to wear when being with that cute informant/spy.
Re:I want to know what he uses in his hair.
by
ElektroHolunder
·
· Score: 1
What does he use to keep his hair so tidy? He can be shot at roughly 40 times, jump on a bike, and jump onto a train without messing up his hair the slightest bit.
Re:I want to know what he uses in his hair.
by
Schwarzchild
·
· Score: 2
"What does he use to keep his hair so tidy? He can be shot at roughly 40 times, jump on a bike, and jump onto a train without messing up his hair the slightest bit."
Aquanet!!!
--
"sweet dreams are made of this..."
Re:I want to know what he uses in his hair.
by
Erik+K.+Veland
·
· Score: 1
To find the answer we must look to that other movie. There's something about Mary.
-- "I tend to think of OS X as Linux with QA and Taste", James Gosling, creator of Java
At least he's driving a British car again.
by
m.lemur
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
mmmm Aston Martin.
I'm so glad they got rid of the BMWs
Re:At least he's driving a British car again.
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Yeah but i thought FORD owned aston martin??
Re:At least he's driving a British car again.
by
m.lemur
·
· Score: 1
Yes, but the Aston Martin marque is as British as it gets.
Re:At least he's driving a British car again.
by
Cheese+Cracker
·
· Score: 2
mmmm Aston Martin.
I'm so glad they got rid of the BMWs
Aston Martin is owned by Ford... so it's not much of a British car anymore... But hey, maybe you call Toyota "a British car", since they got a plant in Burnaston, Derbyshire.;)
Re:At least he's driving a British car again.
by
HedRat
·
· Score: 1
mmmm Aston Martin.
This article made mention of an Edsel, the second Edsel reference I've seen today, freaky. The Edsel would have been a bigger hit if they would have put some hair around the gaping vagina-like grill and called it an "Ethel".
Re:At least he's driving a British car again.
by
InOverMyFeet
·
· Score: 0
Yes, but everything else is as American as the Pinto.
--
-- Probability does not dismiss possibility --
Re:At least he's driving a British car again.
by
stuntpope
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
So, you're saying that Lamborghini is not (always) an Italian car, it (at times) has been a French car, an American car (Chrysler!), an Indonesian car, and a Malaysian car. Most recently, Lamborghinis are German (Audi).
Re:At least he's driving a British car again.
by
brarrr
·
· Score: 1
the ads on tv say its a jag. or at least they say jagwire.
although they look like aston martins.
-- to email me: take my/. handle and append.net preceded by charter.
Re:At least he's driving a British car again.
by
nickclarke
·
· Score: 1
No, the Baddie drives a Jag, Bond drives an Aston - lucky bastard, how many other people get a company car that costs £180,000 ($285,000) BEFORE modification!
Re:At least he's driving a British car again.
by
Mac+Degger
·
· Score: 2
No, he said "mmmmm, Austin Martin". That it's a british car is just an added bonus.
-- --
Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
Re:At least he's driving a British car again.
by
AlexCompy
·
· Score: 1
Yeah, Ford _do_ own Aston Martin, but they let the Aston Martin folk (who are British) do pretty much whatever they want, plus the AM guys get access to Ford's bankroll and stuff.
So in reality, Aston Martin might as well be British, as although ownership resides in the States; to all intents and purposes, control is in Britain.
That said, I was disappointed by the extent to which the Vanquish raided from the Ford parts bin (things like passenger air vents etc).
As far as I am concerned, the V8 was the last REAL Aston Martin (hopefully they'll depreciate enough that I'll be able to afford to buy one some day).
Re:At least he's driving a British car again.
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Lamborghini is part of VWAG, along with vw, skoda seat, audi, bugatti.
As cute as this article is...
by
Triv
·
· Score: 5, Funny
it's sister-article is much more interesting. It's on how much product placement is featured in the new bond movie, and how some are worried that the franchise is sliding downhill into 2-hour ads.
This quote cracked me up:
Norelco's senior vice president of marketing Nina Riley won't reveal how the new Spectra shaver is used in the film except to say it's in a "very pivotal scene."
Re:As cute as this article is...
by
jofizz
·
· Score: 3, Funny
The movie is being referred to as...
Buy Another Day.
-- There is no sig.
Re:As cute as this article is...
by
Tet
·
· Score: 2
Nina Riley won't reveal how the new Spectra shaver is used in the film except to say it's in a "very pivotal scene."
Well that was a complete waste of money for them,
then. I've just seen the film, and I didn't notice
any particular branding on the shaver -- it was
just a shaver!
-- "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
Re:As cute as this article is...
by
rnelsonee
·
· Score: 1
Yeah, um, I saw the Bond movie last night, and it's not used in that way... go to your room!
To be honest, the only thing I remember him using a razor for is... shaving.
Re:As cute as this article is...
by
bellings
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
it's sister-article is much more interesting. It's on how much product placement is featured in the new bond movie,
Do they talk about how much product placement is featured on the front page of MSN, too? Or are we to assume Norelco paid the movie producers to put their product in the movie, but the movie producers did not pay MSN to put their movie on the front page?
-- Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
Re:As cute as this article is...
by
milkman_matt
·
· Score: 2, Funny
Well that was a complete waste of money for them, then. I've just seen the film, and I didn't notice any particular branding on the shaver -- it was just a shaver!
Ahhh, but was it a 'very pivotal scene'!?
-matt
Re:As cute as this article is...
by
rivercityrandom
·
· Score: 1
So... um, they expect us to spend $8 to watch what is basically a 2-hour commercial? And this is preferable to TV... how?
"Not only is MGM spending $30 million in advertising, according to Variety, the movie studio enlisted more than 20 marketing partners who are reportedly contributing at least $100 million in promotional support for the franchise."
Heck, even Iceland shelled out a wad of cash to get its country in the movie. They seem to have almost broken even on just product placement alone. Even if the movie bombs in the box office they'll still make a profit! Perhaps in the future we might see movies paid entirely by advertising, and maybe they'll show them for free... like, I don't know, TV?
--RiverCityRandom (who dreams of the day movies were flowing art, not shouting billboards)
What gadget keeps him from getting VD's from
by
Dareth
·
· Score: 4, Funny
... all those women he sleeps with?
Oh yeah... a simple condom I presume.
"Need a condom?" "No thanks man, I got the lucky condom my dad gave me. He swears it always worked for him."
--
I only look human.
My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
Re:What gadget keeps him from getting VD's from
by
Jerf
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Comedy Central recently re-ran a Sat. Night Live skit on that theme. "Mr. Bond, you have 127 venereal disease, including 18 we haven't identified yet. We've named them after you: Bond 1, Bond 2, Bond 3, etc." **beep beep beep** "Excuse me Mr. Bond, I have to go. Good god, Bond 17 has broken out of its beaker!"
One of the better such things I've seen, and I'm not generally a Comedy Central fan. I think they actually had Pierce Brosnan on for that show, so it was even one of the real Bonds.;-)
Re:What gadget keeps him from getting VD's from
by
Banjonardo
·
· Score: 2
(Best Darell-Hammond-as-Sean-Connery-voice: The Day is mine, Trebek!
--
-----
Score 3? For what? Being wrong, at length? - smirkleton
Neat!
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 4, Funny
In other words, CIA agents rarely carry pellets which allow them to breath under water for extended periods, Earnest said.
But they do carry them on occasion? That's the coolest thing I have ever heard of.
...that Inspector Gadget was a MUCH better crime fighter than 007. Ejector seats??? Bah! Once bond gets a hat that doubles as a helicopter, then I'll be impressed!
Product Placement
by
zuhl
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
I used to enjoy the Bond flicks. They were fun. Connery was witty and all the Bonds are sleek and the women are certainly easy on the eyes.
But the last few movies seem to have been nothing more than extended commercials for huge corporations. Ericsson, BMW. etc. Convergence with a vengence. Now there never really was much of a plot or meaning in Bond films, but now they border on the ridiculous. Even the action scenes are completely subsumed by the products they are hyping. James Bond remote controling his super-neat-o BMW with his tricked out Ericsson phone.
I will see the movie and probably drool over Halle Berry, but I will never, ever buy anything that they are "advertising" in the film. Branding a product or company is fine, but I have a problem with it completely subverting a movie. And the Bond francise seems to be ONLY about pushing specific products/gadgets down our collective throats.
Re:Product Placement
by
sczimme
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Convergence with a vengence.
Convengence?
(Yes, I know vengeance was misspelled.)
-- I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
I have slowly noticed over the years that pretty much all Bond films are pretty bad. I want to believe that they are good, but after watching some of the older ones and seeing the past two, really it isn't that great of a series. The first ones may have been good for there time, but you look back on them now and they are fairly lame. The only Bond film that I liked was Golden Eye, maybe that is just because of the game though.
--
This page was generated by a Barrel of Circus Midgets, and that is the way I like it!!!
Re:Product Placement
by
DrainBead
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
James Bond remote controling his super-neat-o BMW with his tricked out Ericsson phone.
How about looking past the BMW/Lotus/fancy-other-stuff etc and going with the entertainment/fantasy? As in "James Bond remote controlling his cool gadget filled car with an even cooler gadget filled cell phone like any kid (size doesn't matter) would dream about having." Afterall, marketing happens everywhere nowadays - just look at your average webpage.
-- Dyslexics of the world, untie!
Re:Product Placement
by
Strange+Ranger
·
· Score: 3, Interesting
Just 2 points:
1 - I'm happy to see marketing departments that are actually trying to entertain me. Seems for a long time they were simply bent on insulting me... like that ad where the company tries to fix all it's web problems with a song. I can imagine an Ericsson ad where some soccer mom is desperately searching for her lost child (The Beatles "Help" plays in the background) when AHA, she remembers her little munchkin carries a CELL PHONE! I'll take Bond over that any day.
2 - If the movie does entertain me, I don't care how many product placements are in it. As long as their irrelevant to the enjoyment of the movie. Silly example comes to mind... Superman II wouldn't have been any better or worse had Superman crashed into a Cola sign instead of a Coke sign.
but I will never, ever buy anything that they are "advertising" in the film.
As soon as I have enough money I'll be buying a Bond car with rockets and mines. Lets see what happens when those 4x4 driving Mums cut me up now. Oh yes, vengeance will be mine! And when I get stopped by the police, I can just revolve my number plates and say, I didn't do it!;)
"but I will never, ever buy anything that they are "advertising" in the film" AND "the Bond francise seems to be ONLY about pushing specific products/gadgets down our collective throats"
What would that be, the handmade $240K Aston Martin or the one-of-a-kind Omega Seamaster watch or what about the $1000 Sony Ericson phone? They're hardly trying to sell us these products. Who could afford them? And who is going to stop drinking Sprite and switch to 7UP because of a movie. And everyone knows that a razor shaves closer than an electric. This is all a means to keep one of the greatest movie series going for years to come.
2 - If the movie does entertain me, I don't care how many product placements are in it. As long as their irrelevant to the enjoyment of the movie. Silly example comes to mind... Superman II wouldn't have been any better or worse had Superman crashed into a Cola sign instead of a Coke sign.
I -totally- agree.. I don't mind that in The Sopranos all they drink is Coke, or that they had FedEx packages in Castaway, he worked for FedEx for christsake.. but scenes like handing off the *NOKIA* phone in a *FEDEX* box in Matrix annoy me.. the fed-ex dude was center camera for a few whole seconds, and they may as well have zoomed in on the Nokia logo on the phone.. that's just blatent stupid advertising.. (wayne's world II was worse, but damn, that was funny, so it's ok)
It's just a bunch of over-paid yuppies with too much time on their hands. "Where else can we push our ads into?" Somehow corporations think that marketing will fix all the problems with their product. The scary part is that I suppose that view is justified, to a point.
Regarding the over-paid yuppies with too much time on their hands, it's the same with lawyers, but I digress.
Drool over Halle Berry?? Unless her boobs look better than they did in Swordfish... (God what an awful movie...)
Halle Berry - Can't act. Pretty face, bad hair. Nice body, with her clothes on. Picks some of the worst scripts in history.
You can walk into any local Blockbuster and throw a rock and get better eye-candy than Halle Berry. And unless you hit a Daryl Hannah movie by accident, better acting.
When I want to watch a movie, I go to the theatre at the mall, when I want to scope some tail, I'll go to the theatre downtown.
But hey, I never found Natalie Portman all that hot either. (To skinny and sullen.)
"If that's what they're giving us to masturbate to.... OK...." ~Bill Maher
What would that be, the handmade $240K Aston Martin or the one-of-a-kind Omega Seamaster watch or what about the $1000 Sony Ericson phone? They're hardly trying to sell us these products. Who could afford them? And who is going to stop drinking Sprite and switch to 7UP because of a movie. And everyone knows that a razor shaves closer than an electric. This is all a means to keep one of the greatest movie series going for years to come.
Not to mention that the Bond series has been selling products _forever_. How many cars did Aston Martin sell because men with more money than sense wanted to drive James Bond's car? How many Omega watches were sold, even if they didn't have a hidden garotte or laser beam? How many Walther PPK guns? (ok, maybe not that last one...) How many vodka martinis (shaken, not stirred)? How many stylish black suits?
The car's the big one. I imagine all companies making high-end sports cars compete like mad to be the Bond Car, because that's the most obvious bit of 007 kit. An Aston Martin, a Shaguar, a BMW... wonderful, just as long as it isn't one of those hideous plastic cars he had in the Eighties.
To be honest, I can't complain so vehemently about product placement when it's basically 'This Ericsson phone has bugger all to do with the production model except the exterior; Q Branch have torn out the circuitry and installed a whole new - don't touch that, 007!' 'Our watches have tranquilliser darts built in.' 'Our cars have machine guns.'
-- Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
The car's the big one. I imagine all companies making high-end sports cars compete like mad to be the Bond Car, because that's the most obvious bit of 007 kit. An Aston Martin, a Shaguar, a BMW... wonderful, just as long as it isn't one of those hideous plastic cars he had in the Eighties.
Or worse, those American Motors cars he had in The Man With the Golden Gun... It sure made you miss the Aston Martins...
If it makes any difference to your argument, that Ericsson phone was never made - it was a concept phone for the film only - a pity really - I looked for it for ages!!!
Of course the gadgets are fiction. REAL spying is BORING. Yawn!!
If you're going to have an issue with the Bond movies, how about having an issue with the ever increasing commercialization of the series. With this latest one, it looks like you won't go 5 minutes between seeing features product placements... I know this is something that has been going on for a few years with Bond now, but it is almost getting to be like that "Wayne's World" skit on product placement at this point.
Bond: What is this...
Q: Its a plastic bag... You hide things in it and place it under a bridge!
Bond: Wow
Re:Dumb Article
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
As far as cars go, I don't mind because we see all types on the roads whenever you drive. But saying a product is a certain brand is where I have a problem. If they start telling us what model of razor James Bond uses, then I have a problem.
You could argue that XXX is today's version of James Bond. They even have a version of Q. I love how he modified the Pontiac with all sorts of gadgets, which were so far from self-explanatory that it needed a user's manual. So he's driving along at whatever speed while she's trying to figure out how to use the car's gadgets. -russ
I think that in some ways, XXX was a parody of James Bond. Just look at the opening sequence where the tuxedo-clad agent meets his end.
And the scene where XXX and the girl are racing along the highway, and she's trying to figure out the instruction manual seems to me to be an inverse reference back to The Spy Who Loved Me where the female KGB agent was able to use the weapons in the car as expertly as if she'd been trained on them, because she'd stolen the plans for the car the year before.
That female agent's code name? Triple-X.
-- Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
That's certainly what Vin Diesel said he wanted it to be - a JB replacement. He said kids nowadays don't connect with Bond, but they would with XXX. (Sorry, no cite, read this in a theatre mag while waiting for XXX to start.) My response is "Vin, make another 19 exactly like XXX that are at least as successful/good, then we'll talk."
I think the whole premise of XXX was to lighten the genre. So many things in the film were completely crazy. Like the solar-powered jet-propelled hydrofoil/submarine. That's gotta be the best bad idea I've ever heard of.
-Paul Komarek
Does anybody ever feel sorry for Q?
by
CaffeineAddict2001
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
He makes all these awesome gadgets and James uses them in some unintended way and they always break.
If I were Q, I'd keep the laser\toothbrush and replace it with a real toothbrush.
James would probably save the day anyway.
Re:Does anybody ever feel sorry for Q?
by
danlyke
·
· Score: 1
Well, think about it. Bond is the guy with the snappy suits and the perfect hair who wanders cluelessly through the machine room, poking at things and making them explode.
Q is the technical genius who ends up picking up after this schmuck.
Anyone who's ever been a sysadmin or programmer and had to support salesweasels has seen this one played out.
It has to do with people's opinion that Bond films lately are turning into massive product placement vehicles. WW was an example of humorous and blatant placement, that's all.
Yes, that was beautiful. I loved it too. You and I both saw that movie, saw them do the product placement equivalent of stripping in front of you and rolling in a pile of money while singing "I want to buy the world a coke", and loved it. Meanwhile, the movie features two characters who would ostensibly never sell out. The people portraying the characters, of course, are being paid piles of money.
If the love felt for these scenes isn't ironic when viewed in the face of our general hatred for advertising and obscene product placement, I don't know what is.
-- "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
Re:Waynes World
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
I beat the shit out of guys like you in my university; good times:)
Yeah I got caught thinking either handful or about a half a dozen. Came out about a handful. I'd to blame it on working in a law office- no one wants to get tied to what they say- but my brain just works that.
I'm sure I have many more exciting spoonerisms to share with the world;-)
Thanks to RollingThunder as well for understanding the point of the initial post;-)
-- If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
Re:I want to see his condoms!
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
I'd like one that would either: A) Emit some sort of sleeping gas to put that bitch to sleep when I am done or B) turn in to a DVD of some new release so I can watch a movie afterwards.
Re:The interviewee doesn't get it-Star Trek
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 1, Funny
"The point isn't to make some super-accurate spy film"=Star Trek
"it's to show off some fancy gadgets"=Phasers,Enterprise,Tricorders.
"sleep with as many hot women as possible"=James T Kirk.
"whack some bad guys"=Romulans,Tholians,Klingons.
"A very simple, entertaining, and successful formula. "=TOS,TNG,DS9,VG,Movies galore.
I'd say someone got it.
A little more story wouldn't hurt
by
Sabalon
·
· Score: 5, Interesting
I don't mind the gadgets getting a bit out of hand, but the crash/fx stuff is getting ridiculous.
They need to have a little more of Bond using his wits and physical skills to survive a situation, not some gadget and car.
On Her Majesty's Secret Service and For Your Eyes Only stand out in my mind as some good examples - as does much of The Living Daylights.
Yeah...the stories are a bit over the top - so what...that's the idea...an over the top agent for an over the top situation...but give us at least some espionage, etc...
Hell...even A View To A Kill had a) bond undercover, b) surviving by sucking the air out of the tire on the Rolls, c) making a getaway on a fire truck (this I would call part of the using his wits).
Now adays he'd walk into the horse stables shouting "I'm James Bond...try to stop me...I work for MI6", have a minisub in the trunk of the rolls, and make a getaway in a Harrier while blowing up 30 cars.
BTW - can't wait for Die Another Day to open:)
Re:A little more story wouldn't hurt
by
tomhudson
·
· Score: 3, Funny
Now adays he'd walk into the horse stables shouting "I'm James Bond...try to stop me...I work for MI6", have a minisub in the trunk of the rolls, and make a getaway in a Harrier while blowing up 30 cars.
Oops, how did you get Arnold's next movie plot summary?!?
Re:A little more story wouldn't hurt
by
n-baxley
·
· Score: 2
Now adays he'd walk into the horse stables shouting "I'm James Bond...try to stop me...I work for MI6"
You know, I always wondered why he immediatly came out and gave his name. "Bond, James Bond" Duh, if you're this famous spy, why tell everyone your real name? It's the classic case of stupid bad guys who should just shoot him once he tells them who he is.
Re:A little more story wouldn't hurt
by
Alan+Shutko
·
· Score: 2
They need to have a little more of Bond using his wits and physical skills to survive a situation, not some gadget and car.
If you listen to the commentaries on the Bond DVDs, you'll find out that the people making the films are aware of this. There seems to be a cycle where the gadgets start to get out of hand, then a new director steps in and decides he's going to take Bond back to the basics. That lasts for a while, but then the gadgets come back....
The recent movies haven't been, in my mind, quite so gadgetful. For example, I don't think Bond got to use his car hardly at all in the last film.
Re:A little more story wouldn't hurt
by
jred
·
· Score: 2
I'm just glad they got Pierce Brosnan (sp?) for the role. I've always thought he'd make a great Bond. Heck, even *I'd* be a better Bond than Daltry (or whoever that last guy was)...
--
jred
I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
Re:A little more story wouldn't hurt
by
halo8
·
· Score: 1
Here Here
I totally Agree.. im glad you have the +5 Mod Points
My Issue with the bond films of late is lack of continuance and violance. the Continuance... all the recent bond films have random evil characters doing the same old (new) thing.. money and big buisness (drugs, Oil, media)
Where is Ernst Blowfelt? the man that killed his fiance? where is shmert? (sp?) bring back an old charachter.. or bring back a character from one of the new films... a past advisary.. thoes always ROCK
and the Violence.. they blood and guts the wanton killing (yes he has a licence to kill) but the violence is just wrong for bond, its out of character. (p.s. im not saying violence is bad, i love GTA3, imjust saying its not a bond trait)
-- The More Knowledge you have the Luckier you Get- J.R. Ewing
Re:A little more story wouldn't hurt
by
Myco
·
· Score: 3, Interesting
Are you kidding? If you're seriously asking this, then you've missed a pivotal aspect of Bond's character. He's all about the bluster and confidence to just march right in and announce himself. James Bond does not skulk -- it's not nearly suave enough. It's a macho thing -- Bond has to look his enemy in the eye, man to man etc.
On a related note, many people protest that you do not shake a martini unless you want to "bruise the gin." Bond knows this -- he asks for it shaken because he's an iconoclast.
Re:A little more story wouldn't hurt
by
matticus
·
· Score: 2
being as Bond doesn't drink gin martinis, that's all well and good. I think instead of Finlandia he should drink Stolichnaya, as that seems more Bond-y to me.
Re:A little more story wouldn't hurt
by
Myco
·
· Score: 2
Good point, though I would imagine stirring is traditional even for vodka martinis (otherwise he wouldn't need to specify).
btw I was in Russia a while ago, and Stoli is like the bottom-shelf stuff there. Pretty funny.
Re:A little more story wouldn't hurt
by
Sabalon
·
· Score: 2
Ernst Blofeld was killed in the opening of "For Your Eyes Only". Actually, the character was owned by Kevin McClory who was getting money everytime they used Blofeld and SPECTRE. While they never said it was Blofeld, the "hairstyle" and cat were a dead giveaway. Kinda their way of saying to hell with you McClory...who then went on to make Never Say Never Again with Connery and Blofeld!
Too many of the old characters end up dead, so bringing them back would be real interesting...but I'd love to see Scaramanga or Stromberg again!
As for the violence...I think that they did a good job with it in "The World Is Not Enough" when M came up on Bond after he killed Elektra. It seemed to show it's something he sometimes has to do, but doesn't like it.
As for the characters all about greed - well, they can't really keep doing KGB stories - no one would know what the hell that is. In "Living Daylights" they had Gogol - a big KGB bad guy from prior movies - and mentioned that he is now with the forgeign liason office or something - ie...kgb is dead.
I guess they figure that people would prefer some supervillian for Bond to figure out than our current "threats". MidEast plots would just be people willing to die for religion. Far East plots could be a possiblity.
Something interesting would be the UK trying to get some info out of the US (blah blah blah, political leadership difference, not sharing info), though that may alienate US audiences.
Re:A little more story wouldn't hurt
by
Sabalon
·
· Score: 2
Honey...some guy on SlashDot told me I need to buy the Bond DVD's...okay? Yes...I do have them on VHS already, but now I can hear the filmmakers comments. No...you don't have to sit through them
I'll have to try and check them out
Re:A little more story wouldn't hurt
by
reverseengineer
·
· Score: 1
The way I've heard it explained, vodka martinis should be shaken, rather than stirred, as shaking ends up producing a colder beverage, and vodka is more palatable cold. This is in contrast to gin, which tastes like crap no matter how it is served. (Just kidding.) While confirming the veracity of my answer, I found that the Straight Dope has a nice explanation of this subject, as they often do.
-- "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
Re:A little more story wouldn't hurt
by
some+guy+I+know
·
· Score: 1
You are thinking of Roger Daltry, who was also the backup drummer for the Rolling Stones. He also starred in the movie "Help!", along with the other members of the band: Jenny McArthy, Vladimir Lenin, Harrison Ford, and the "Fifth Stone", Ringo Starr.
...
Yes, all of the above is BS.
-- Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
Re:A little more story wouldn't hurt
by
Quila
·
· Score: 2
You're thinking Timothy Dalton.
Actually, Dalton would have never been Bond if Hollywood hadn't acted in its usual brutal manner. IIRC, Pierce Brosnan's then series Remington Steele was losing ratings and was about to be canceled, then Brosnan was asked to do Bond. This caused lots of publicity and the show got more popular. The studio refused to release Brosnan to do Bond because they were making money off the show again. Then interest died down and the studio canceled the show after Brosnan's chance at Bond had passed.
Re:A little more story wouldn't hurt
by
Daniel+Dvorkin
·
· Score: 2
Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. -
Benjamin Santayana
Your.sig is one of the funniest things I've ever read. Thanks for brightening my day.
-- The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
It wasn't 007 who came up with...
by
RobertB-DC
·
· Score: 3, Funny
From the article: Military designers watched Bond films for inspiration, he said, and the films gadgetry helped inspired a prototype called the SmartTruck, a technology-loaded, anti-terrorism personal mover.
I thought that the idea came from the Combat Ready Recreational Vehicle in the movie Stripes, didn't it?
John Winger (Bill Murray): "It's not the speed that's important, I just wish I hadn't drunk all that cough syrup this morning."
-- Stressed? Me?
Of course not.
Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
Re:It wasn't 007 who came up with...
by
DroppedPacket
·
· Score: 1
Combat Ready Recreational Vehicle in the movie Stripes
That's EM-50 Urban Assault Vehicle.
-- I am not a resource! I am a free man!
Re:It wasn't 007 who came up with...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Of all the gadgets I've seen in all the Bond movies, the only one that really grabbed me and made me say "I want THAT!" was the soviet tank he drove through the streets of Moscow. All the rest was tripe or too unbelieveable to even illicit interest.
-- There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
They did a level like this in one of the recent Bond games. I think it was Agent Under Fire. I only played a little of the single player, but the tank level was great. It felt a lot like that scene in the movie.
YES! This became one of my all-time favorite, ah, car chase scenes. There was tremendous hype about the chase in Bourne Identity, but, frankly, Bond's tank chase was hands-down better.
This, to reflect another poster's assertion, was using available materials -- ie, his wits -- to best advantage. Mr. Broccoli, et al, more intrigue and plot please; less action-hero stuff.
--
Put my fist through my alarm clock
with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
Re:The Tank
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
They had this in Goldeneye for the N64.
Re:The Tank
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
"All the rest was tripe or too unbelieveable to even illicit interest."
Fingerprint activated gun? I've heard talk about developing those to put in homes in order to ensure only the one(s) who is/are supposed to can shoot the gun. (Incidently, the ONLY interesting feature of License to Kill. The Living Daylights is one of my favorite movies, so it wasn't Dalton - I'll never understand why they had to waste a Bond movie budget on that stupid License to Kill script.)
That was supposed to be St Petersburg. Moscow looks flashier but is tackier. Actually because of some idiots trying to ask too much, the chase was filmed in Helsinki, but the location footage really came from St. Pete.
Then I guess you must have missed...
by
IPFreely
·
· Score: 5, Informative
... the special on cable TV (What channel was that anyway?) called "Bond Girls". It was reviews and interviews with most of the women who have played Bond girls over the years.
It was hosted by Maryam d'Abo of The Living Daylights. She went around searching for and interviewing women from Ursula Andress (of Dr. No) through Hally Berry.
It's probably not the show you were looking for (no pr0n here), but it was a good show.
-- There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
Re:Then I guess you must have missed...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
what is this thing you call TV?
What Bond really needs...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
...the Stealth Condom. Go in deep and get out alive without being detected.
"There is no real-world counterpart to a car that shoots with machine guns."
Didn't some country over in the middle-east build a car that could shoot a machine gun or a missile or something? I know they have one (in the middle-east) that had flame throwers that would fire if someone tried to carjack you.
Re:Machine gun car?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
This is definatly not the same product, but Dave Barry's column this week:
Yes! According to an Associated Press article by Charles Sheehan, a company called Ibis Tek is modifying Chevrolet Subdivisions and other big-momma ''sport'' utility vehicles to accept machine guns, which are fired via a joystick inside the car. These are mostly sold to foreigners; to have one the United States, you need a permit from the federal government, which requires you to have a good reason. Fortunately, I do: I drive in Miami.
I am tired of having nothing but a puny horn to alert the 258-year-old driver in the Oldsmobile ahead of me that the green arrow pointing left means you can turn left now . . . c'mon please turn . . . TURN LEFT PLEASE C'MON C'MON HURRY UP IT'S GONNA CHANGE OH NOOOOO. I think the federal government would have to agree that this is a situation where a friendly warning burst of several thousand.50-caliber rounds would be a big help to traffic flow.
The Ibis Tek people also offer an option for a grenade launcher, but I think that would be overkill, don't you?
Re:Machine gun car?
by
mino
·
· Score: 2, Informative
I know they have one (in the middle-east) that had flame throwers that would fire if someone tried to carjack you.
That would be South Africa, and it's called The Blaster.
Re:Machine gun car?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
So what he's saying is that the Bond films have to become more like Star Trek. In order to get out of those tight jams, if they want to be AHEAD of the times, instead of using fake things like pellets to breathe underwater, they have to start using teleporters to beam out.
Heh, that should keep the movies ahead of technology for the next century or so:)
Muffed the link, sorry!
by
RobertB-DC
·
· Score: 1
That link to the movie Stripes should be this one. Obviously, "http://slashdot.org/Militarydes...mover." is not a valid URL.
"Use the Preview Button! Check those URLs! Don't forget the http://!"
1 out of 3 kinda sucks. Mod parent as "-1, Preview-Impaired":(
-- Stressed? Me?
Of course not.
Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
that the one line I want to hear in a Bond movie is
"Excuse Mr. Bond, but is your shoe ringing?"
BTW, This is the second lamest story I have every seen on/. (Sorry, but what kind of post would expect from a guy with craw as his id.)
19th century patent office almost closed down.
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 1, Insightful
This reminds me of the true story of the British commissioner of patents in the late 19th century who advised the government that the Patent Office should be soon closed because just about everything that could be invented already had been.
All this week, Daily Planet, on Discovery Channel Canada, will be featuring little segements of James Bond tech & science.
Watch last night's segment here (caution -- ASF formatted clip).
-- "Yeah, well, Dracula called and he's coming over tonight for you and I said okay."
Re:Put the Gadget in This
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
I agree with this post. I bet the giver probably killed himself after getting no respect. Meanwhile the reciever just keeps on trucking. It's a cruel, cruel world. Rest in peace, giver.
Ian Flemming's books
by
Taos
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
After reading three of the original Bond books (Dr. No, From Russia With Love, Goldfinger) this past summer, I have come to realize that Bond really was an action character from the beginning. So, those talking about how Connery's Bond was thoughtful and dealt with more espionage, read the books.
M was constantly telling Bond to try and be more inconspicuous, but he got into too much trouble anyways. I think instead, the pacing of the original Bond films comes from the style of film making during the 60's. They used much more dramatic pacing, where as Flemming raced through much of the slower points of his books by skimming details. Whereas, when the action was going, he described every little pore on Bonds body.
I do have to note, however, I much prefer the thoughtful pacing of that era of movies instead of the non stop action of today's movies. Another example outside of the Bond area is the movie "The Day of the Jackal" and it's horrid remake "the Jackal". The original was extremely slow, but kept you on the edge of your seat from beginning to end.
FWIW, that'sout of order, for the books. But you probably realized that when the beginning of Dr No had Bond recovering from the poison boot-knife from the end of FRwL.
The Fleming novels. Other authors also listed here.
Of all the gadgets I've seen in all the Bond movies, the only one that really grabbed me and made me say "I want THAT!" was the soviet tank he drove through the streets of Moscow. All the rest was tripe or too unbelieveable to even illicit interest.
I think Illicit Interest would be a good name for a bond film
Re:Illicit Interest
by
Mononoke
·
· Score: 2, Funny
I think Illicit Interest would be a good name for a bond film
Or a Bond Girl [tm]
-- NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
EMP by nukes ...
by
Hektor_Troy
·
· Score: 3, Informative
EMP pulses are generated by high altitude bursts that send a shitload of charged particles into the ionosphere. That gob of electrons in the upper atmosphere is what generates the EMP pulse.
Don't try this at home kids!
-- We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
...do Bond women have to say? Especially in the more recent movies, when they're reduced to saying "Oh James!"
Nothing against the actresses personally -- but the women used to be more interesting, more sexy, more dangerous (don't the two go hand in hand). It seems like the franchise has taken an already vapid role and made it... vapider? When the Bond girl is tough at the outset, she pretty much melts once Bond shows up, which is OK, but stays melted. Boooooring.
OK, Ian Fleming wrote the books, it's his world. But didn't they run out of books a while ago?
I wouldn't want to cross Domino, though. Does she count as a Bond girl?
Who was the best Bond girl (woman) as pinup? As adversary?
Re:What the hell...
by
Enry
·
· Score: 5, Informative
Go read "The Spy Who Loved Me". It's a drastic departure for what you expect from Bond. For one thing, it takes place in upstate NY (Lake George area). For another, it is written from the perspective of a Canadian woman who was educated in England and was driving from Canada to Florida and got stuck...in Lake George.
For those of you that think Fleming wrote most of the movies, it WAS true for a little while. Dr. No, From Russia With Love, and most of Goldfinger were true to the novels. Even Thunderball and On Her Majesty's Secret Service. But most of the rest were either very different from the books, or were short enough to be reduced to the opening sequence (The Living Daylights). Go spend the time to hunt through E-Bay or your local used bookstore to find them. It's worth it.
Re:What the hell...
by
Robotech_Master
·
· Score: 5, Informative
Just be sure you don't end up with a book I picked up in a used bookstore a while ago because it looked amusing: the novelization of The Spy Who Loved Me, written by Maibaum's co-script-writer for that movie. Apparently the filmmakers were uncomfortable about the movie being so different from the book, so they wanted to put something on store shelves that people would at least recognize as similar. Quite bizarre.
Many people don't realize this, but the fact is, Fleming never intended to write the James Bond books just for the sake of writing them. From the very beginning, he had his eye on lucrative TV/movie adaptations. The very first adaptation was of Casino Royale in 1959, on an otherwise forgettable CBS anthology TV series. It made James Bond American and put him in the CIA. (I saw a tape of that episode in Best Buy years ago, before I knew what it was, and I'm still kicking myself for not buying it.) The rights issues surrounding this early sale led to the subsequent Casino Royale Woody Allen parody.
When interest arose in making movies from his books (largely because President Kennedy was seen reading Dr. No), Fleming told the Broccolis, in effect, "If you can use the plot, use it. If you can just use the title, use it. I don't care, as long as you pay me."
If you're wondering how I know this, I took an intersession course in James Bond a couple years ago at my local college (Southwest Missouri State University)'s media department. It was most informative.
(Did you know that Ian Fleming also did the concept development work for The Man From U.N.C.L.E.? Or that all three leads from the Bond-copycat series The Avengers ended up with roles in James Bond movies?)
-- Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
It made James Bond American and put him in the CIA. (I saw a tape of that episode in Best Buy years ago, before I knew what it was, and I'm still kicking myself for not buying it.)
Mmm...1950's TV. I actually have the videotape.
It was live and he was being called "Jimmy" all the time. It's painful to watch, but certainly something for a Bond collector to have.
Did you know that Ian Fleming also did the concept development work for The Man From U.N.C.L.E.?
Slightly offtopic, however in terms of squeezing the life out of this 007 syndication, I reckon Sean Connery accurately sums it up by stating that the James Bond movies have stagnated and that Quentin Tarantino should direct the coming ones.
Re:What the hell...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Well actually Ian wrote the BOOKS that became most of the films. A number of others have written Bond books over some time since then.
Yep. Another book that was different from the movie. I read the book first, and was deeply disappointed in the movie; it would have been so much better if they'd stuck to the plot about the gang of bandits rather than inventing an imaginary country.
-- Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
I think they actually had Pierce Brosnan on for that show, so it was even one of the real Bonds.;-)
Not that you really wanted to know, but that episode of SNL stars Garth Brooks (with musical guest Chris Gains) and Chris Parnell plays Bond in that sketch.
Ah, thanks for the link! Well, I shot 50/50 or so on that message overall;-) About par for human memory.
...but a talking frog is pretty cool?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
...so the story goes...
The most effective theft deterant ever.
by
OgreFade
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
Out of all the bond gadgets I prefer the Lotus' alarm system. There is a sticker on the window that says "this vehicle is protected by a security system." This cannonfodder in an arab getup, just laughs and procedes to break the window with the butt of his gun. The car promptly explodes.
Q is angry reprimands Bond, and reassembles the car.
not that i'm cheap -- well, i am, but...
by
MacAndrew
·
· Score: 2
Here is a reference on when the copyrights will run out, and various other FAQ-like materials.
You're right, I should look at the books again. It's been a while. I don't generally assume the movie tracks the book very faithfully -- Harry Potter I was a first!
The 'Stang
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
I wanted the 'Stang from the Golden Gun movie.
ac
Re:if i had a car [sic] like bond's
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
And with a dictionary, you might know how to spell 'laid' - oh and for the matter, 'car'
Re:XXX? Gotta be kddn!
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
How come a Pontiac could be a sophisticated spy's car??? HAVE YOU EVER SEEN A PONTIAC AZTEC??
I don't want to troll or something but, American cars, even though good machines, have terribly awful designs that will never catch up with an Aston Martin...
Aggressive product placements -- such as Ericsson's hip new cell phone, which doubled as a lock pick and laser gun -- were featured in the 1997 film. Ericsson says sales of the unit doubled after the movie.
ah, so they sold another one. Bravo...
-- I make these: http://beatseqr.com
Probably redundant..
by
the+unbeliever
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
But who really cares how unrealistic the gadgets are? It's a movie for $DEITY's sake. I like watching movies with wierd little technogadgets, Bond & XXX had both, even if XXX was a major disappointment.
I think you mean the requisite geek girl
by
Ayanami+Rei
·
· Score: 1
who is awkward but at times plays the pivotal role in some scene (because the bad guy has convientently forgotten about her)
-- THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE
ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
The frozen lake in Iceland that is the location for some car chases, does not freeze very often naturally. This is due to its closeness to the sea and its high salt content. To rectify this situation the river that links the lake to the sea was damned and within two days the entire lake was frozen to a depth of over 2 meters.
Which priest did they hire for that - father Merrin? Maybe hell finally froze over...
What about range and batter charge?
by
boy_afraid
·
· Score: 1
Why is that in SOAF that anyone can be reached anywhere in the world through regular cellphones, and why is it that they NEVER have to recharge their cell phones. I guess they must be using Protoculture batter cells or coldfusion cells?!
Thanks for the compliment. You're the first person who has mentioned it. I was thinking that it's about time to change it, but I'll hold off for a little while, now that you've puffed up my ego probably more than it deserves.
(My next.sig will probably be "Any sufficiently advanced Perl script is indistinguishable from magic. - Larry C. Clarke". It's slightly geekier than my current.sig, but may be more appropriate for slashdot.)
-- Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
I BET WHAT HAPPENED was they discovered fire and invented the wheel on the same day. Then that night, they burned the wheel.
-- Jack Handley, The New Mexican, 1988.
- this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...
Troll... James Troll.
Trolling is a art,
is a device that looks like an ordinary pen, but allows you to get the first post in any thread.
Does anyone know who has replaced Q? Can this actor actually play the part well?
-- AcquaCow
up 12 days, 22:30, 2 users, load averages: 993.20, 994.21, 994.56
*makes note to limit user processes...
The best gadget in the bond movie is the REV!
I think we would all want a Bond girl...
although...Bond gadgets could go well with Bond girls...
-- AcquaCow
up 12 days, 22:30, 2 users, load averages: 993.20, 994.21, 994.56
*makes note to limit user processes...
That's nice. Someone please wake me for the article on the Fact and Fiction Behind Bond's Women. (Especially the Fiction!)
Those x-ray (re: see through clothes) glasses from the last Bond movie were really cool...
Wait a second, just what is hogwash exactly?
Ford owns Astin Martin, and that's nice, but doesn't anyone agree that the Thunderbird looks horribly disfigured? Definitely one of the ugliest cars I've ever seen.
:)
And as far as gadgets go, I'll never be rich, I'll just have lots and lots of toys.
Everyone on slashdot has a journal.
now there's a poll for which you can't have enough options...
Seriously, apart from rocket shooting cars, I've found most Bond accesoires rather dumb. A laser wristwatch strong enough to burn your way into a steel safe ? Com'on, we're geeks, but even those don't believe everything !
When will I end this grieving ? When will my future begin ?
1. Make gadgets
2. Sell them to 007
3. Profit!
"CIA-types and geeks love to bicker over that one." i always thought it was the dmca.
Surrender YR pattent!
"The world of James Bond is fiction. Bond wouldn't last 4 minutes as a real spy."
Spoken like a true jealous wannabe.
The speed of time is one second per second.
I'm not a huge fan of Brosnan as Bond, but one of the few high notes of his 007 career is the glee on his face while operating the BMW from the rear seat using his phone as a controller. Too bad there's probably too much concrete in that garage to get a decent cell signal. Could be Bluetooth in addition to cell, neh? I don't recommend that as an option in newer cars: I've seen how my kids drive on the PlayStation.
Design for Use, not Construction!
While Bonde may have the coolest gadgets of them all, the best are those used in the movie: "The Sum of All Fears" where our hero's c-phone and PDA just keeps on working fine in the middle of a radioactive explosion. Can Bonde beat that? I think not -- he is British not an American. Go figure.
Karma stuck at 50? Add 2-5 inches.. err.. 2-5x Karmas Count to your pen1es.. err.. Karma all naturally and private
I wonder how much does companies like Nokia, Rolex or BMW pays to be the official modified gadget for Spy Agents. Must be a great money to sell, in a single movie, and being a great shuttle for the new models/equipments.
CCV.
If they could only come up with a gadget to make the IRS lose my tax records.
Mine has to be the remote control car he has in Tomorrow Never Dies.
That and the exploding pen in Goldeneye.
Julie Moult is an idiot.
With a car like Bond's I could get layed and be a /. junkie.
those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do. -isaac asimov
Now if you're the type who can't help un-suspending your disbelief
I am not able to flatly deny that I couldn't be the type of person that isn't completely excluded from that set of people. Are you?
Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
The car in the article's photo looks more like a DeLorean. Is this a shot from Back to the Future IV: After The Polar Ice Caps Melt?
"The girls, you could argue, are just a distraction in James Bond films."
"Give a woman two glasses of wine and some pad thai, and they'll agree to just about anything." the Sports Guy
Bond Is Fiction.
Of course the movie gets it. What the commenter doesn't get is that the movie is about fantasy. It's not trying to be a realistic portrayal of life as a spy, it's about selling copies, giving kids a fantastical role model, and being down right entertaining. everyone (well, men) want to be Bond at some point of Bonds career or another, loads of people mimic Bond's speach. I'd say that Hollywood gets it
When all else fails, piss on it. At least you will feel better in some kind of way.
"In that sense, the problem facing Bond filmmakers is similar to the problem faced by software companies, cell phone carriers, and other high-tech firms, who seem to only offer barely noticeable incremental improvements to technologies their consumers already have, rather than radical new products. In this sense, art is imitating life -- or at least the Nasdaq." At This point, And it's been said here on /. many times.. What is left for the younger generations to invent.. it seems that the more the tech sector grows..the less the "real" or "radical" inventions come to be a reality.. or it could just be me...
Just Limin' Mon
Obviously written by a Nerd.
Forget the whales - save the babies.
What does he use to keep his hair so tidy? He can be shot at roughly 40 times, jump on a bike, and jump onto a train without messing up his hair the slightest bit.
Slashdotter are stupid and biased.
"But because (Bond's) technology actually worked it helped us to the point where we all had cell phones and PDAs."
And may God damn him for it.
Everyone on slashdot has a journal.
mmmm Aston Martin.
I'm so glad they got rid of the BMWs
This quote cracked me up:
The article's here.
Triv
... all those women he sleeps with?
Oh yeah... a simple condom I presume.
"Need a condom?" "No thanks man, I got the lucky condom my dad gave me. He swears it always worked for him."
I only look human.
My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
In other words, CIA agents rarely carry pellets which allow them to breath under water for extended periods, Earnest said.
But they do carry them on occasion? That's the coolest thing I have ever heard of.
...that Inspector Gadget was a MUCH better crime fighter than 007. Ejector seats??? Bah! Once bond gets a hat that doubles as a helicopter, then I'll be impressed!
eMelody Web Directory add your site today!
I used to enjoy the Bond flicks. They were fun. Connery was witty and all the Bonds are sleek and the women are certainly easy on the eyes.
But the last few movies seem to have been nothing more than extended commercials for huge corporations. Ericsson, BMW. etc. Convergence with a vengence. Now there never really was much of a plot or meaning in Bond films, but now they border on the ridiculous. Even the action scenes are completely subsumed by the products they are hyping. James Bond remote controling his super-neat-o BMW with his tricked out Ericsson phone.
I will see the movie and probably drool over Halle Berry, but I will never, ever buy anything that they are "advertising" in the film. Branding a product or company is fine, but I have a problem with it completely subverting a movie. And the Bond francise seems to be ONLY about pushing specific products/gadgets down our collective throats.
If you're going to have an issue with the Bond movies, how about having an issue with the ever increasing commercialization of the series. With this latest one, it looks like you won't go 5 minutes between seeing features product placements... I know this is something that has been going on for a few years with Bond now, but it is almost getting to be like that "Wayne's World" skit on product placement at this point.
You could argue that XXX is today's version of James Bond. They even have a version of Q. I love how he modified the Pontiac with all sorts of gadgets, which were so far from self-explanatory that it needed a user's manual. So he's driving along at whatever speed while she's trying to figure out how to use the car's gadgets.
-russ
Don't piss off The Angry Economist
He makes all these awesome gadgets and James uses them in some unintended way and they always break.
If I were Q, I'd keep the laser\toothbrush and replace it with a real toothbrush.
James would probably save the day anyway.
"Nuprin- little, yellow, different."
If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
I'd like one that would either: A) Emit some sort of sleeping gas to put that bitch to sleep when I am done or B) turn in to a DVD of some new release so I can watch a movie afterwards.
"The point isn't to make some super-accurate spy film"=Star Trek
"it's to show off some fancy gadgets"=Phasers,Enterprise,Tricorders.
"sleep with as many hot women as possible"=James T Kirk.
"whack some bad guys"=Romulans,Tholians,Klingons.
"A very simple, entertaining, and successful formula. "=TOS,TNG,DS9,VG,Movies galore.
I'd say someone got it.
I don't mind the gadgets getting a bit out of hand, but the crash/fx stuff is getting ridiculous.
:)
They need to have a little more of Bond using his wits and physical skills to survive a situation, not some gadget and car.
On Her Majesty's Secret Service and For Your Eyes Only stand out in my mind as some good examples - as does much of The Living Daylights.
Yeah...the stories are a bit over the top - so what...that's the idea...an over the top agent for an over the top situation...but give us at least some espionage, etc...
Hell...even A View To A Kill had a) bond undercover, b) surviving by sucking the air out of the tire on the Rolls, c) making a getaway on a fire truck (this I would call part of the using his wits).
Now adays he'd walk into the horse stables shouting "I'm James Bond...try to stop me...I work for MI6", have a minisub in the trunk of the rolls, and make a getaway in a Harrier while blowing up 30 cars.
BTW - can't wait for Die Another Day to open
From the article: Military designers watched Bond films for inspiration, he said, and the films gadgetry helped inspired a prototype called the SmartTruck, a technology-loaded, anti-terrorism personal mover.
I thought that the idea came from the Combat Ready Recreational Vehicle in the movie Stripes, didn't it?
John Winger (Bill Murray): "It's not the speed that's important, I just wish I hadn't drunk all that cough syrup this morning."
Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
Of all the gadgets I've seen in all the Bond movies, the only one that really grabbed me and made me say "I want THAT!" was the soviet tank he drove through the streets of Moscow. All the rest was tripe or too unbelieveable to even illicit interest.
There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
It was hosted by Maryam d'Abo of The Living Daylights. She went around searching for and interviewing women from Ursula Andress (of Dr. No) through Hally Berry.
It's probably not the show you were looking for (no pr0n here), but it was a good show.
There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
...the Stealth Condom. Go in deep and get out alive without being detected.
Bond has nothing on Steve McGarret...
for exactly that reason. If I wanted to watch 2 hours of ads I'd turn on QVC. Ever since "Tomorrow Never Dies" James Bond has meant product placement.
sulli
RTFJ.
I believe that the only reason this stupid subject would make it on slashdot as a real article is that Slashdot is getting paid to showcase the movie.
I'm your huckleberry
....is Pussy Galore!
The bomb was stored inside a soda machine at the Super Bowl.
retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
Quoting the article:
"There is no real-world counterpart to a car that shoots with machine guns."
Didn't some country over in the middle-east build a car that could shoot a machine gun or a missile or something? I know they have one (in the middle-east) that had flame throwers that would fire if someone tried to carjack you.
So what he's saying is that the Bond films have to become more like Star Trek. In order to get out of those tight jams, if they want to be AHEAD of the times, instead of using fake things like pellets to breathe underwater, they have to start using teleporters to beam out.
:)
Heh, that should keep the movies ahead of technology for the next century or so
That link to the movie Stripes should be this one. Obviously, "http://slashdot.org/Militarydes...mover." is not a valid URL.
:(
"Use the Preview Button! Check those URLs! Don't forget the http://!"
1 out of 3 kinda sucks. Mod parent as "-1, Preview-Impaired"
Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
"Today's audiences are much more sophisticated, and require bigger and bigger magic tricks to be impressed"
Apparently he hasn't been to many movies lately.
that the one line I want to hear in a Bond movie is
/. (Sorry, but what kind of post would expect from a guy with craw as his id.)
"Excuse Mr. Bond, but is your shoe ringing?"
BTW, This is the second lamest story I have every seen on
This reminds me of the true story of the British commissioner of patents in the late 19th century who advised the government that the Patent Office should be soon closed because just about everything that could be invented already had been.
h at .shtml
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/done_t
Since nothing was invested this past century, I absolutely agree with you.;-)
All this week, Daily Planet, on Discovery Channel Canada, will be featuring little segements of James Bond tech & science.
Watch last night's segment here (caution -- ASF formatted clip).
"Yeah, well, Dracula called and he's coming over tonight for you and I said okay."
I agree with this post. I bet the giver probably killed himself after getting no respect. Meanwhile the reciever just keeps on trucking. It's a cruel, cruel world. Rest in peace, giver.
After reading three of the original Bond books (Dr. No, From Russia With Love, Goldfinger) this past summer, I have come to realize that Bond really was an action character from the beginning. So, those talking about how Connery's Bond was thoughtful and dealt with more espionage, read the books.
M was constantly telling Bond to try and be more inconspicuous, but he got into too much trouble anyways. I think instead, the pacing of the original Bond films comes from the style of film making during the 60's. They used much more dramatic pacing, where as Flemming raced through much of the slower points of his books by skimming details. Whereas, when the action was going, he described every little pore on Bonds body.
I do have to note, however, I much prefer the thoughtful pacing of that era of movies instead of the non stop action of today's movies. Another example outside of the Bond area is the movie "The Day of the Jackal" and it's horrid remake "the Jackal". The original was extremely slow, but kept you on the edge of your seat from beginning to end.
Taos
A titanium based hair gel of course! :O Search this page for "titanium".
Of all the gadgets I've seen in all the Bond movies, the only one that really grabbed me and made me say "I want THAT!" was the soviet tank he drove through the streets of Moscow. All the rest was tripe or too unbelieveable to even illicit interest.
I think Illicit Interest would be a good name for a bond film
We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
...do Bond women have to say? Especially in the more recent movies, when they're reduced to saying "Oh James!"
... vapider? When the Bond girl is tough at the outset, she pretty much melts once Bond shows up, which is OK, but stays melted. Boooooring.
Nothing against the actresses personally -- but the women used to be more interesting, more sexy, more dangerous (don't the two go hand in hand). It seems like the franchise has taken an already vapid role and made it
OK, Ian Fleming wrote the books, it's his world. But didn't they run out of books a while ago?
I wouldn't want to cross Domino, though. Does she count as a Bond girl?
Who was the best Bond girl (woman) as pinup? As adversary?
Our man Flint recently passed away...
As we were talking about spy things, I thought that we would take a moment to think about him.
Also of note is that the many of gadgets in this movie have b(r)ought the film to a record for product placement.
:p
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/2488151.stm
So unless a friend tells me that Bond gets rejected by Halle Barry at the end of the movie, I'm not going to pay to see it.
Remember "Bring 'em on"? *sigh
I think they actually had Pierce Brosnan on for that show, so it was even one of the real Bonds. ;-)
Not that you really wanted to know, but that episode of SNL stars Garth Brooks (with musical guest Chris Gains) and Chris Parnell plays Bond in that sketch.
The transcript is available here:
...so the story goes...
Out of all the bond gadgets I prefer the Lotus' alarm system. There is a sticker on the window that says "this vehicle is protected by a security system." This cannonfodder in an arab getup, just laughs and procedes to break the window with the butt of his gun. The car promptly explodes. Q is angry reprimands Bond, and reassembles the car.
Here is a reference on when the copyrights will run out, and various other FAQ-like materials.
You're right, I should look at the books again. It's been a while. I don't generally assume the movie tracks the book very faithfully -- Harry Potter I was a first!
I wanted the 'Stang from the Golden Gun movie.
ac
And with a dictionary, you might know how to spell 'laid' - oh and for the matter, 'car'
How come a Pontiac could be a sophisticated spy's car??? HAVE YOU EVER SEEN A PONTIAC AZTEC??
I don't want to troll or something but, American cars, even though good machines, have terribly awful designs that will never catch up with an Aston Martin...
First off, it was a 1967 Pontiac GTO, an old muscle car, not a new one GM was trying to promote.
And second, Aston Martin technically is an American company , as they are owned by Ford.
NO SIR ... But we are willing to learn
Aggressive product placements -- such as Ericsson's hip new cell phone, which doubled as a lock pick and laser gun -- were featured in the 1997 film. Ericsson says sales of the unit doubled after the movie.
ah, so they sold another one. Bravo...
I make these: http://beatseqr.com
But who really cares how unrealistic the gadgets are? It's a movie for $DEITY's sake. I like watching movies with wierd little technogadgets, Bond & XXX had both, even if XXX was a major disappointment.
who is awkward but at times plays the pivotal role in some scene (because the bad guy has convientently forgotten about her)
THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
Shaking, not stirring.
I browsed through the trivia section of the movie, and found the following disturbing information:
The frozen lake in Iceland that is the location for some car chases, does not freeze very often naturally. This is due to its closeness to the sea and its high salt content. To rectify this situation the river that links the lake to the sea was damned and within two days the entire lake was frozen to a depth of over 2 meters.
Which priest did they hire for that - father Merrin? Maybe hell finally froze over...
Why is that in SOAF that anyone can be reached anywhere in the world through regular cellphones, and why is it that they NEVER have to recharge their cell phones. I guess they must be using Protoculture batter cells or coldfusion cells?!
Thanks for the compliment.
.sig will probably be "Any sufficiently advanced Perl script is indistinguishable from magic. - Larry C. Clarke". .sig, but may be more appropriate for slashdot.)
You're the first person who has mentioned it.
I was thinking that it's about time to change it, but I'll hold off for a little while, now that you've puffed up my ego probably more than it deserves.
(My next
It's slightly geekier than my current
Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
I BET WHAT HAPPENED was they discovered fire and invented the wheel on
the same day. Then that night, they burned the wheel.
-- Jack Handley, The New Mexican, 1988.
- this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...