Slashdot Mirror


Farscape Fans Produce Commercial

angst writes "Farscape fans have come together and produced a commercial called 'I am Farscape'. In the hopes of bringing more media and consumer awareness that the fans of this show are not happy that it is being cancelled. So far it will be aired in 24 cities nation wide. Look for it the week of Nov. 24th if you are in the list."

349 comments

  1. Yikes! by Overand · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've seen this commercial, and if anything, it will convince Sci-Fi that Farscape fans are a bunch of untalented fan-boys (and girls) that smell bad, and don't know how to make a commercial. It's... bad.

    On the other hand, Farscape is so great that it's taking up 13 gigs of my hard drive... ::blinks innocently::

    1. Re:Yikes! by Robotech_Master · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I dunno...I'd characterize the commercial as "quirky," but not necessarily bad. And in the end, it really doesn't matter how good or bad the commercial is; the important thing is that it's getting aired and getting publicity for the campaign. These people aren't giving up, and if it gets me more episodes of the show, I have to say more power to them. This thing has gone farther than any save-our-show campaign I can recall...it's going to be interesting to see where it ends.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    2. Re:Yikes! by kingkade · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've seen this commercial, and if anything, it will convince Sci-Fi that Farscape fans are a bunch of untalented fan-boys (and girls) that smell bad...

      Have that new smell-o-vision, huh?

    3. Re:Yikes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Downloading a crappy bad acting sci-fi show under a poorly coded Linux distro. Can we possibly see worst than that? Looking at goatse.cx is not that bad after all.

    4. Re:Yikes! by morpheus+2001 · · Score: 1

      1000 monkeys with 1000 typewriters could have written a better script in 1000 years than that piece of crap! I am indifferent about Farscape, but that commercial was just awful!!!!

    5. Re:Yikes! by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      Probably because you didn't click the 20 other links to other clips by other people. I nearly dismissed it too, but the point has been made: people want their Farscape.

      There are actually some decent looking chicks, shocker, I know.

    6. Re:Yikes! by cribcage · · Score: 2

      Not to nitpick your obviously-acerbic wit...

      But for future reference, if you decide to recycle this witty little quip of yours: The 'hyperbole' you want is actually something more like, "Two drunken, crippled monkeys twisting bananas into each other's buttocks could have spit onto manuscript paper and produced a better script than this garbage."

      'Cause, y'know... If a thousand monkeys at a thousand typewriters could type "Hamlet," I'd think they could manage to trump the Bayville Junior High A/V Team's weekend project.

      crib

      --

      Please don't read my journal
    7. Re:Yikes! by enneff · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      The guy who says "I'm so and so and I build robots for a living," looks like the biggest dickhead ever. He makes me want to never, ever watch Farscape - ever. He makes me associate Farscape with idiocy and social ineptitude.

    8. Re: Yikes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm, how come I've never meet a geek that looks like that guy? And talented too.

    9. Re:Yikes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny you should mention that because I've been working with students doing video for years and their worst isn't as bad as this commercial.

    10. Re:Yikes! by ideonode · · Score: 1

      Two monkeys, ten minutes.

      (Thanks to Scott Adams)

    11. Re:Yikes! by wheany · · Score: 1

      Okay, I don't want to watch them all, just tell me which one he is.

    12. Re:Yikes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, thanks a lot. I only watched the ones made by somewhat-cute women. Then I had to go back and find this guy to see just how annoying he was.

      He's "Matt" -- guy with the red baseball cap. I'd choose a couple of other candidates for stay-away poster boys, though. On the other hand, a couple of people on there were pretty convincing. If I didn't know better, I might tune in.

    13. Re:Yikes! by gabec · · Score: 2
      I haven't seen the commercial, nor have I watched Farscape since the first season, but I wrote Scifi.com when I heard they were cancelling the show. Why? At Dragon*Con this year (I'm pretty sure it's the largest science fiction / fantasy convention in the world), Farscape had an insanely large following. D*C had to make a special category for Farscape in the costume contest because there were so many people showing up dressed as Farscape characters.

      If nothing else can be said for it, this show has one devoted audience. Maybe some of the main actors wanted to leave or maybe it's one of those "the numbers never lie" situations. But nonetheless, to have Scifi toss it away seems like a bad idea.

    14. Re:Yikes! by DJ+FirBee · · Score: 1

      //These people aren't giving up, and if it gets me more episodes of the show, I have to say more power to them. This thing has gone farther than any save-our-show campaign I can recall...it's going to be interesting to see where it ends.//

      If you like the show why don't you _do_something about it ??

      Maybe because you are all snuggled up in your nerd nest by the computer and you can play some dorky computer game instead or write code (like html).

      Nerds are passive losers.

      I could walk in your house smack you on the nose and smash your trinitron and you would post to slashdot about how crime is rampant.

      I could kick your ass but you could kick my ass on a playstation.

      You make me sick. Loser.

    15. Re:Yikes! by Robotech_Master · · Score: 2

      Dude, there's no call for that. I never said I hadn't taken action, too. I'm too far from any of the cities that have been having rallies to participate in them, but at least I've written some letters and made some phone calls myself.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    16. Re: Yikes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because doing that would mean leaving your cubicle at work once in awhile, or moving from the couch/computer desk to the bar on the weekends. :)

    17. Re:Yikes! by kicksaska · · Score: 1

      Pretty much a big old shrug in the commercial quality department. Considering the people who produced it were denied the right (by Henson) to use any logos, music, show footage, or anything else show-related in producing it, they had to go with what they could.

      The point isn't for the commercial itself to draw in new viewers. The point is for the fact that it was produced, and aired, to generate enough buzz that people will check out the show. This is called Using Your Assets, and as a way to subvert the big corporate advertising market, especially when Sci Fi won't advertise the show themselves, it's pretty ingenious.

      --
      Common sense isn't.
    18. Re:Yikes! by Meldranian · · Score: 1

      I think you are missing a huge point of the commercial. Farscape Fans are REAL people..not paid actors with a film crew and film budget. The point is the fans are regular, intelligent people and we are EVERYWHERE.

  2. with this much support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    with these many people willing to strongly support it, it makes one wonder why the show is in danger of being cancelled in the first place.

    1. Re:with this much support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because it isnt all that good, it didnt last long on channel 9

    2. Re:with this much support by Dallascaper · · Score: 3, Informative

      I assume you are referring to Nine Network in Australia. Nine thought enough of Farscape to help bankroll it with the Jim Henson Company in 1999. Knowing Australia's bleak history with science fiction, Nine waited until May 2000 to broadcast the first half-dozen episodes. The show didn't do well, so Nine decided to put the show up against the 2000 Olympics. No wonder Farscape hasn't done well in Australian ratings.

      My experience with Australian Scapers is that they are among the most vocal and intense Farscape fans out there. Last December/January, when Nine finally broadcast the show's second season, my Farscape site got more hits from Australia than from any other country. My point is that Aussie Scapers may be few in number, but they do have excellent taste in television programming.

      Long live Farscape!

      Dallascaper
      Webmaster, http://www.farscapefantasy.com

    3. Re:with this much support by Binarybrain · · Score: 0, Troll

      Because theres only 2 of them. Farscape is the worst scifi I have ever seen.

    4. Re:with this much support by anno1a · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because farscape is an extremely expensive series to produce. Although Scifi gets lots of viewers for farscape, they can make more money, producing a cheap, low-quality show which attracts half the audience. Unfortunately, with this strategy, we get a lot of boring cheap television, which no one really likes, rather than exciting visually stunning television, that everyone likes (or at least a large group of people).

      --
      ------- I fumbled my registration and I now must suffer
    5. Re:with this much support by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      with these many people willing to strongly support it, it makes one wonder why the show is in danger of being cancelled in the first place

      Let me draw you an analogy. There are (or were) lots of companies trying to make Linux products. The problem was that although many people love Linux, a very small minority are willing to actually pay for it. Like that games company whose name escapes me just now... there was a lot of clamour on /. for Linux ports of games, but at the end of the day, everyone bought the Windows version and dual-booted, so the company went bust.

      There's a poster in this topic who says he has 13G of FarScape on his HD, that's how much he loves it. Umm, no, if he loved it he would have bought the DVDs. People like him in fact killed the show.

      (FWIW, I thought FarScape was utter rubbish, but I have plenty of channels so I am counting myself as a neutral observer here).

    6. Re:with this much support by hatchet · · Score: 1

      No, he didn't... maby people(like me) would have never known about farscape, if we didn't download it from the net.
      I am Farscape supporter.. but i would never buy original DVDs. I rather don't watch it than buy it.

      And even if i'd like to buy Farscape, i couldn't... You cannot get it in Slovenia. Ok we can order it online from Amazon or smtg.. but mailing costs as much as dvd itself.

      Our local televisions wouldn't air such show ever.. All they did is air first two seasons of Stargate and few seasons of StarTrek. They rather stick to cheap Mexican shows like Esmeralda, Cassandra, ... and other idiotic shit for old grannies.

    7. Re:with this much support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are in the minority and thus your opinion doesn't matter much.

    8. Re:with this much support by cel4145 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "There's a poster in this topic who says he has 13G of FarScape on his HD, that's how much he loves it. Umm, no, if he loved it he would have bought the DVDs. People like him in fact killed the show."

      sounds like you are working for the entertainment industry. haven't you heard? p2p file trading helps to increase the popularity of shows like farscape and push up sales and viewing audience. i've got 20gigs of farscape and own 3 of the dvd packs with a total of 12 episodes bought and paid for, and i'd like to buy more. just can't do it today.

    9. Re:with this much support by dandelion_wine · · Score: 1

      Cut him some slack. I agree, P2P widens the pool of potential viewers which can lead to increased sales, but this guy didn't say "I love it so much I've got 13G of it on my hard drive, plus the DVD's" -- sounded to me like he'd just pirated it, period, and those are the people who kill these things.

      So many people don't like sci-fi, never mind a particular show, if you love it and don't support it, you're taking a gigantic dump on the people making it happen.

    10. Re:with this much support by zmalone · · Score: 2

      I've heard the opinion that it isn't really in danger of being canceled. The argument behind it is that Sci-Fi feels that they are paying far too much for each episode, and that the calue of the episodes is inflated. By canceling it, they've shown that they are willing to stop carrying the show if the price per episode isn't lowered. I personally think that this isn't too unlikely, and while it could mean that a season could be delayed a year or so, it makes sense for Sci-Fi to do this.

    11. Re:with this much support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > p2p file trading helps to increase the popularity of shows like farscape

      It can't do a very good job of that if you keep them to yourself. How about some magnet links? Assuming you use Gnutella of course.

    12. Re:with this much support by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      the sci fi channel doesn't get any money from the DVD's, their lack of merchandising rights is one of the reasons they are so willing to kill it.

    13. Re:with this much support by kicksaska · · Score: 1
      Erm. Well, that would signal a Mr.-Burns-style brilliant and devious mind behind the Sci Fi channel. I doubt that very much; Barry Diller ("I don't like space shows, despite being head of the science fiction channel") hasn't given any indication he's got the smarts to do anything except make deals for cheap to produce parapsychobabble melodrama.

      Sad truth is that (a) Sci Fi Channel is pretty low on money (b) Henson is very low on money (c) EM TV, Henson's parent company, is in court over how badly they've mismanaged their money and (d) Farscape costs a lot of money to produce.

      Where Sci Fi frelled up (to use a Farscape-ism) was in making and publicizing a 2-season deal, and then backing out of the second season - with an attempt to do so surreptitiously. Yes, I do think it is at least as likely Sci Fi will renew the show as it is that another network will buy it. That's not because I think they engineered this whole groundswell, though. It's because if the advertisers want to fund it, Sci Fi - with its stranglehold on syndication *and* future production rights - will be the path of least resistance for getting it back on the air.

      --
      Common sense isn't.
    14. Re:with this much support by schon · · Score: 1

      The show didn't do well, so Nine decided to put the show up against the 2000 Olympics

      Is Nine the Aus affiliate of Fox?

      If not, sounds like the executives went to the same broadcasting school.

    15. Re:with this much support by xercist · · Score: 2

      I'll second that - I'd never have heard of farscape if my friends didn't download some from some guy's bot on dalnet, and if I wasn't able to do the same (to download the first, second, and third seasons), I would certainly never have been hooked on it just by watching some episodes in the fourth. Farscape episodes are always heavily affected by the previous storyline, and it's really important to know what's going on.

      Now I'll go over to a friend's house (who has a service which carries SciFi) to watch 4th season eps as they air. And guess what - I see the SciFi channel's commercials in the breaks.

      --

      --
      grep "xercist" /dev/random ...you'll find me in there someday
  3. I hope it works by Russellkhan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Farscape is/was a great show.

    I mean think about it, Enterprise gets funding and Farscape is a far better show (I know, I know, Farscape doesn't have detox gel)

    --
    Information doesn't want to be anthropomorphized anymore.
    1. Re:I hope it works by sammy+baby · · Score: 2

      Pfft. Farscape may not have detox gel, but it had plenty of steamy scenes involving Claudia Black, Virginia Hey, and Gigi Edgley (one can only assume that Raelee Hill isn't far behind).

      Say what you will about Farscape, but it didn't lack sex appeal.

    2. Re:I hope it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then again, Enterprise doesn't have blue-vegetable-woman-arse either. Let's see Enterprise beat that any time soon.

  4. Wow by MacAndrew · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd like to see this -- what, no link? -- and have to wonder how Star Trek TOS would have done if it had had *this* kind of rabid support.

    But then, how much does Sci Fi care what its hardcore geeks think? There was an interesting article in the Times on how terribly inaccurate the advertising world's obsession with the 25 to 34 demographic is. And it is what the advertisers want, or think they want, that drives commercial programming. (Maybe Farscape should move to HBO -- might even get me to subscribe.)

    1. Re:Wow by DennyK · · Score: 1, Troll

      Probably cause it's Quicktime... ;)

      "H-h-h-h-h-h-i I'm-m-m-m-m-m-m Joe and I-I-I-I-I-I'm Fars-s-s-s-s-s-scap-p-p-p-p-pe." (By now, the video portion is halfway through the *next* person's speech...)

      Or am I the only one who suffers from this Quicktime problem, where the audio skips and repeats like a record the cat used as a scratching post, while the video keeps playing merrily along, getting further and further ahead of the stuttering audio track? ;)

      DennyK

    2. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Aren't all of these movements to get shows back in production based on letters from TOS fans back in the '60s?

      TOS gets cancelled, fans send letters, the network does more shows, nobody else watches, and the show gets cancelled.

      Roswell gets cancelled, fans send condiments, another network buys it and does more shows, nobody else wacthes, and the show gets cancelled.

      X number of people watched the show and the network decided they were spending way too much money for only X number of viewers. X number of people start a campaign, send letters, etc. and they expect...what? It wasn't like the show wasn't heavily hyped(I don't have cable and I knew about the show from radio and TV commercials). For this to be realistic, the fans have to prove that it'll be worth the network's time and money to try again.

    3. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1 Off Topic Are you using Win 2K? You need a patch and it still doesn't work well.

    4. Re:Wow by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      True but...

      The TOS fanmail campaign helped get it a third season, but then the network turned around and moved the show to a ridiculous time slot like Friday 10pm. Their hearts were not in seeing the show succeed: there may have been enough internal lobbying to extend one more year, but not to package and promote it. For success you need not the fans but people who had not previously watched at all.

      Their error in the long run is obvious -- an extra year or two of episodes would have been worth a fortune. Perhaps the show might have even done better first-run, if handled well. But I don't really blame the execs for not perceiving the coming snowball effect. Star Trek was a unique property. And so is Farscape.

    5. Re:Wow by eve11 · · Score: 1
      I don't know that I would equate the online Farscape community with "geeks" in the Slashdot sense of the word. The online presence of mainstream fans is large with Farscape. And if SciFi doesn't care about them, the cast and crew of Farscape certainly do, which is perhaps why we see such a "rabid" following.

      Since the show was filmed in Australia but not aired there, cast, crew and producers routinely used the Internet to gauge their following. At the first US convention people would write their internet handles on their nametags, and often a cast member (Anthony Simcoe, Ben Browder, etc), would actually recognize the handle. Over Halloween 2002 in LA, three farscape fans took to the streets in costume and with a big poster of the bad guy from the show. And, amidst the 100,000 people out and about, series star Ben Browder saw their poster and took the time to track them down, come over and talk to them. Even took pictures.

      There is also a very large female presence over at the site. Writers, graphic designers, stay-at-home moms, bus drivers, students, lawyers, etc. I'm a 25-year-old female PhD student, I love ice hockey and football and reading science fiction. My s.o. is the one who regularly checks out slashdot, and I was the one who got HIM hooked on Farscape. Check it out. I talk to guys about Farscape and I routinely hear, "My sister watches Farscape religiously," or (with 8-year-old child in tow at comic book convention), "I don't watch it, but my wife loves that show."

      So we're not quite all hardcore geeks, and the commercial isn't really meant for geeks. It is meant for mainstream folks who maybe wouldn't normally watch scifi. The "I am Farscape" tag is a little dig at the SciFi channel's own marketing scheme of "I am SciFi."

      As for moving to HBO, well, they'd definitely get me as a subscriber.

    6. Re:Wow by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      three farscape fans took to the streets in costume and with a big poster of the bad guy from the show

      "The bad guy from the show"? Scorpius? Are you sure you're a fan? :)

      I agree that there is a large viewer base, one that could be even more mainstream. As for "rabid geeks" I was thinking of fans who create and air their commercials! Better than geeks would be a term equivalent to Trekkers. Farscapers doesn't work for me, and Scapies sounds like a disease. No matter. (You seem to think "geek" is exclusive of "female," which may be mostly true but could hurt some feelings around here.)

      Interesting background, thank you. BTW, Star Trek (not TOS so much) also had/has a large female following -- as much as 50% at times IIRC. Both have decent stories, not just space battles and explosion. Shows that are character-driven I think are much more interesting and long-lived, and appeal to a broader spectrum of viewers. Farscape has female characters as a strong or more than ST, and is also unusual for its willingness to rotate characters in and out over the course of show -- Xan, Jool, etc.

      Since the show was filmed in Australia but not aired there... Gee, they don't carry SciFi in Australia? After all, the show doesn't technically air anywhere, it is cable-only so far as I know. (Post-TOS, the Star Trek shows share this, they've all been syndicated; no networks.)

      IMHO the SciFi programmers have made a deplorable error, going with the likes of John Edward over Farscape. Not an error on the level of some country plunging into an ill-advised war in some other country, all of which shall remain nameless, but still a dumb ill-advised error. Mark my words (!) Farscape has a ton of revenue potential, though that's not why I watch it. Anyhow, would you rather dress up as a Klingon or Deanna (and if the latter, please post pictures) (kidding :).

    7. Re:Wow by eve11 · · Score: 1
      Are you sure you're a fan?

      LOL, I wasn't sure how many people here would understand if I said "Scorpius." Sorry about the female thing; it's just that Scapers (not "Scapies"; I agree that sounds like a skin condition or something!), like many scifi followers, seem to be automatically lumped into the "fanboy" genre. People see images of the comic book guy from the Simpsons. Heck, even last night on Leno they dissed scifi fans on "Celebrity Jeopardy":

      Jay: The answer is '72 virgins.'

      Eminem (played by Gilbert Gottfried, lol): What are the first 72 men to come through the door at a Star Trek convention?

      That's no truer for Farscape than it is for Trek, or for Babylon 5. As for dressing up, well, I didn't finish my Aeryn costume in time for halloween, much to the S.O.'s dismay ;)

    8. Re:Wow by MacAndrew · · Score: 1

      Aeryn? So he's that kind of guy. Be honest (we won't tell): is he more a Crichton, a D'Argo, or a Rygel?

      Scapers/ies -- yeah, especially undesirable considering it infects SHEEP. My wife just helpfully suggested "Frellers," which brings us to

      72 virgins

      I don't know about you, but I'm aware at least some Scapians have excellent sex lives. Spread the word.

      P.S. Oh dren, I see I frelling misspelled Zhaan's name. What the yotz, I'm going to go send a bucketful of frelnik dead dentics to the greebol SciFi drannits who couldn't even find their mivonks in the dark.

      (Novitiates can find translations etc. here.)

    9. Re:Wow by eve11 · · Score: 1
      Need you ask? Of course he's a Crichton -- blond-haired blue-eyed scientist extroardinaire.

      I've got Aeryn's dark hair and blue eyes, but according to the S.O. my nose isn't right for the total Claudia Black experience.

      What the yotz, I'm going to go send a bucketful of frelnik dead dentics to the greebol SciFi drannits who couldn't even find their mivonks in the dark.

      Yeah, are they tinkt? They're not just fahrbot, they're magra-farhbot! Hezmana, those wellnitzes at SciFi need to get their dren together -- maybe it would be better to just send them the empty bucket.

    10. Re:Wow by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      he's a Crichton -- blond-haired blue-eyed scientist extroardinaire

      Uh-huh. He's reading over your shoulder, huh? Or you broke your glasses. Or messed up your meds ... again.

      Kidding! Forgive my skepticism, in my experience most scientists look more like Gollum, at least the ones who don't get out much. :)

      my nose isn't right for the total Claudia Black experience

      I'll leave "the total Claudia Black experience" to the imagination.

      those wellnitzes at SciFi need to get their dren together

      I think the problem is with their wormholes.

      Crossing fingers for Farscape future ... what was this thread about again?

  5. Why was the show canceled? by joshua404 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've seen and read so much from so many fans of this show all over the net, that I keep asking myself - if they have this large and loyal a following, why was this show canceled? What were the ratings like? What was Sci-Fi's reasoning? I don't exactly see a plethora of good original programming on that channel, so why kill off one of the few successes?

    1. Re:Why was the show canceled? by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

      To put it bluntly, it was canceled because it really began to stink. I mean really. The first two-and-a-half seasons were outstanding, but things really took a dive after that.

      As much as it pains me to admit it-- I used to be such a gianormous fan-- it's a good time for Farscape to go.

      --

      I write in my journal
    2. Re:Why was the show canceled? by nukem1999 · · Score: 1

      "It cost too much"

      You think they coulda figured that out before they decided to sign on for 2 more seasons, and in the end only delivering on one.

    3. Re:Why was the show canceled? by Robotech_Master · · Score: 5, Informative
      There are several reasons given, depending on who you ask and when. Among the big ones are:

      Too expensive: The show costs an awful lot to produce, as SF shows tend to, and apparently Sci-Fi's in a bit of a money crunch. The high production cost wouldn't be so bad, except...

      They don't own the show; Henson does, as part of the production agreement (though they each finance half the show's cost). Which means SFC doesn't get the back-end income from syndication and DVD/video and such to recoup their costs. Adding to the problem is the fact that...

      The show's fandom isn't expanding: Farscape is keeping the fans it has, but it's not causing more people to come to watch the show. See, that's the problem with shows that build up a lot of backstory...if you haven't watched the first four seasons, you have no idea what's going on. (This problem has been noted in other mega-arc-based shows, such as Andromeda.) SFC wants shows that suck more people in (and get them watching SFC). And finally, it's been said that...

      SFC is supposedly moving away from "space-based" shows and heading more toward the "paranormal," in keeping with the latest fads/trends in the TV people are watching. Which makes you wonder why they even bother calling themselves "sci-fi," but there you go.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    4. Re:Why was the show canceled? by FeloniousPunk · · Score: 2

      SFC is supposedly moving away from "space-based" shows and heading more toward the "paranormal," in keeping with the latest fads/trends in the TV people are watching. Which makes you wonder why they even bother calling themselves "sci-fi," but there you go.
      I thought the whole paranormal craze tanked with the last few seasons of X-Files? I've been in Europe for a while so I'm out of touch with what's going on back home though, so I could be wrong.

      --
      I know this because Tyler knows this.
    5. Re:Why was the show canceled? by DarkZero · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've seen and read so much from so many fans of this show all over the net, that I keep asking myself - if they have this large and loyal a following, why was this show canceled? What were the ratings like? What was Sci-Fi's reasoning?

      Simple economics. The show was expensive to produce, so it needed a large audience in order to justify its existence. Its audience began to decrease, so it started bleeding huge amounts of money every week, and with a budget that high, it probably wouldn't have taken very long for the show to hit the point where it would have to do extremely well on a consistent basis for one or two full seasons just to become profitable again.

      But even though that's their reason for doing it, it's still a very stupid reason. As Matt Roush from TV Guide pointed out, Farscape was the only thing that ever got the Sci-Fi Channel any national exposure in the entire history of the channel, and it got it quite a bit of national exposure too. Farscape was the only reason that the Sci-Fi Channel was ever mentioned in TV Guide, Entertainment Weekly, and all of the other national entertainment magazines, and it also got them exposure for their other shows because they from "the channel that brought us Farscape".

      It's just a simple, familiar matter of someone basing a decision on nothing but raw statistics and not thinking about all of the other elements involved.

    6. Re:Why was the show canceled? by pediddle · · Score: 1

      Just to get my 2 cents in, I thought the first few seasons of the X-Files were based much more strongly on paranormal plots. The last few seasons focused more on the alien conspiracy. Or maybe that was your point?

    7. Re:Why was the show canceled? by Babbster · · Score: 1

      I think you are probably right that the paranormal isn't drawing the people it used to. Then again, TV executives are probably only just now catching up to what people wanted five years ago. Then YET again, I'm probably a prototypical geek who is too much into the scifi and video game niche that I am completely out of touch with the mainstream, too.

    8. Re:Why was the show canceled? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      f they have this large and loyal a following, why was this show canceled?

      Because loyal does not necessarily equal large.

    9. Re:Why was the show canceled? by NetGyver · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Damn, that was best most well thought out post I have ever seen on slashdot. Seriously, this is no joke. I saw bits and pieces of farscape after Stargate SG-1 was over, and it seemed a bit weird to me and I never got into it enough to keep current with the show.

      And your right-on about the kind of shows that build up so much back story in their early seasons. Again, Stargate does a shitload of this as well. Which is something I just can't understand since it recently moved to the Sci-Fi channel at the start of its 6th season. (As a side note, Season 7 is also underway)

      So perhaps your idea of too-much-backstory-loses viewers-who-watch-later-seasons idea isn't really much of a factor.

      Another good point you made is that the sci-fi channel is turning to a paranormal-horror flick channel. I got my overdose of that from watching the x-files and it gets very wornout after a while. (by no means am i knocking the x-files, it's just...well...it really drug out)

      It's sad, really sad to see that happen. Remember Sliders?

      Granted it never was quite the same after the professor left, when Wade got replaced by a Rambo-babe, and and Quinn dropped out. The only guy left standing is Rembrandt. I really dug that show, but it should have died, considering 3/4's of their orginial cast was gone.

      VR-5, Babylon 5, TNG, Viper(hey, i liked it), Earth: Final Conflict, Adromida, (and other great shows that i'm missing) should all be reborn via re-runs and put into a mega-block spot on one channel.

      Since i'm going hidiously off-topic with my idealist rants, I may as well add my thoughts on the "network-no-one-thought-could-be-so-good"....

      TNN certinally turned my head, airing old TNG episodes at least once a day, and 4 back to back episodes on sunday nights. Did any of you see that HILAROUS (and pretty outragious TNN commercial they'd air during the show?

      The one with the klingon woman and the exec asking the other if he'd do her. That one really cought my attention, I can't remember when i laughhed that hard at a commerical. In any case, need to get back on topic:

      The level of outcry for Farscape's return is inspring to hear about. Alot of people here on slashdot sneer about it, but hey, they're putting hard-earned fan money towards a show that they loved, and their entitled to doing it. There's a certian respect in that, and I'd be the first one to sign a patition and donate some money if my favorite sci-fi show was dying too.

      --
      A Penny for my thoughts? Here's my two cents. I got ripped off!
    10. Re:Why was the show canceled? by spectecjr · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are several reasons given, depending on who you ask and when. Among the big ones are

      These are all the reasons given by SciFi.

      They also have all been - to greater or lesser extents - debunked.

      For example - too expensive? SG1's budget was increased for their 7th season, and is way more than that of Farscape.

      ($2.5MM for SG1 vs. $750K for Farscape, per episode)

      Simon

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    11. Re:Why was the show canceled? by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 2

      Ugh. Paranormal. Yawn.

      Possibly my least-favorite genre, although anything to do with massive conspiracy theorys comes a close second.

      The first few seasons of X-Files was pretty good, but I stopped watching when it started getting really wierd.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    12. Re:Why was the show canceled? by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      I used to be a rabid farscape fan... the show was absolutely awesome and I wouldn't miss it for anything.... Until season 3... they started the touchy feely crap, the show no longer "felt" like farscape. and what finally did it for me was the fact that the new show count and production schedule was cut in half... what the hell is that? I like reruns of a show I realllly like. but when you see 4 rerusn between each new show... screw that.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    13. Re:Why was the show canceled? by Bobulusman · · Score: 2

      I did not have so much of a problem with Season 3 as Season 4. I really like this show, but it seemed like in this last season that the plots would be really contrived. It also seemed like they could not keep a character's attitude the same from episode to episode.

      I guess what it felt like to me was a patchwork of stories: As if they had seperate teams writing the various plots, completely blind to each other, and then stitched them together at the last minute. Obviously, this isn't the case, but you know what I mean.

      --
      Cogito ergo sum in Slashdot.
    14. Re:Why was the show canceled? by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2

      The paranormal and the sop opera stuff is why I have not turned on Sci-Fi in about 3-4 years. Even Farscape is a bit of a strech to me. This is why I did not like B5. In those to shows, I can't sit down and watch it and understand it like I can Enterprise and ST:TNG. If I wanted a soap opera I would not be working 9 to 5! :)

      The Paranormal stuff just does not interest me and, in my opinion, a great amount of normal folks. Personally I watched more Sci-Fi when they were all about repeats. Buck Rogers, Battlestar Galactica, The HORRID Glactica 1980 (yeah it sucks, but at least it's not Kolchak the Night Stalker)....good Sci-Fi I grew up with. Even Trek replays were better then what's on now. To me, the paranormal is NOT Sci-Fi. What science is there in Ghosts? We don't even have proof Ghosts exist! I know I know, Warp Drive doesn't exist either, but you know, it might exist. Anyone can see that it could possibly happen. They said we'd never break the sound barrier yet we now have fighter aircraft and passenger aircraft capable of doing just that. They say we will never be able to travel faster then light, but I do believe it will happen (maybe not in my lifetime, but it will happen). Sci-Fi needs to drive Science. Faster then light travel should be a goal of ours if we ever want to see anything outside of our solar system. How does paranormal Sci-Fi drive science? It doesn't. At least not near as much as Star Trek and other shows do. Only thing paranormal Sci-FI does is reduce Sci-Fi's cost to produce shows. Not near as many effects are needed for these types of shows. That's why they are going that direction. It has nothing to do with what's popular.

      --

      Gorkman

    15. Re:Why was the show canceled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love when people don't like something because they "can't understand it."

    16. Re:Why was the show canceled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. Brave for admitting it though.

    17. Re:Why was the show canceled? by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      But does SG-1 have more viewers? Which would mean higher ad rates, which would make the larger investment sensible...

    18. Re:Why was the show canceled? by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      Well, really, would _you_ like something that you couldn't understand?

    19. Re:Why was the show canceled? by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Problem.

      SG1's produced by basically either Showtime or Cinemax. I can't remember exactly either.

      Unless Sci-Fi picked up the producing part of the deal...

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    20. Re:Why was the show canceled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ($2.5MM for SG1 vs. $750K for Farscape, per episode)

      Yeah. And that Stargate thing is such crap. Good shows get the shaft. Typical.

    21. Re:Why was the show canceled? by numbuscus · · Score: 1

      The show was canceled because of:

      1) Sci-Fi doesn't control it and they want to control everything; and

      2) Sci-Fi doesn't control it and they want to control everything.

      Often the real profit in a show is not the first run, but the syndication and VHS/DVD sales. Sci-Fi never had rights to these - as far as I know - so they canceled. Networks don't care about the fan-base. They don't have to. The networks are basically a huge cartel and don't have to worry about the fan-base. If you switch the channel, you are most likely going to land on another Fox owned channel. The network loses nothing by you 'voting with your feet'.

    22. Re:Why was the show canceled? by Hans+Lehmann · · Score: 1
      I don't exactly see a plethora of good original programming on that channel, so why kill off one of the few successes?

      TV programming decisions aren't based on the quality of the show, the size of it's viewing audience, or the number of petitions mailed to the networks. TV programs are cancelled whenever the money spent on the show and the time slot devoted to broadcasting it can be better invested in another product. Quality means nothing if the viewers aren't there. Viewer numbers mean nothing if they aren't part of the demographic that advertisers are interested in. Advertiser interest means nothing if the show costs more to produce than it returns in advertisement income.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    23. Re:Why was the show canceled? by Anonymous+Cow+herd · · Score: 1

      SFC is supposedly moving away from "space-based" shows and heading more toward the "paranormal," in keeping with the latest fads/trends in the TV people are watching. Which makes you wonder why they even bother calling themselves "sci-fi," but there you go.

      I was going to say exactly that... if they're going to paranormal, shouldn't they be called the frickin' Miss Cleo network or some shit?

      --
      Ita erat quando hic adveni.
    24. Re:Why was the show canceled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't Miss Cleo's network shutdown after the FTC investigation and fine?

    25. Re:Why was the show canceled? by Vagary · · Score: 2

      See, that's the problem with shows that build up a lot of backstory...if you haven't watched the first four seasons, you have no idea what's going on. (This problem has been noted in other mega-arc-based shows, such as Andromeda.) SFC wants shows that suck more people in (and get them watching SFC).

      So what kinds of shows don't suffer from this problem? What tips could we give to producers to allow their fandom to continuously expand? Can we abstract a quality that long-lived SciFi shows have?

    26. Re:Why was the show canceled? by vanyel · · Score: 2
      ($2.5MM for SG1 vs. $750K for Farscape, per episode)

      Where did you get those figures? Farscape News quotes CNN quoting Jim Henson TV that Farscape is $1.5M/episode, though they also say that Buffy and Enterprise are in the $2M range. All the estimates I've seen for SG-1 are in the $700K-1.5M range too...

    27. Re:Why was the show canceled? by garethx1 · · Score: 1

      you have to keep in mind who the viewers are (although they may be the same) i.e. the 18-25 group is worth twice as much as the 26-35 age group and the 60+ market is worth nothing....

  6. This has been done before by packeteer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    with mixed sucess... i know freaks and geeks fans tried to get it back on but they werent successful... does anyone know of any shows that did comeback this way?

    --
    unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    1. Re:This has been done before by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 5, Informative

      Now I feel really old. Kids today... no attention to history.

      Heard of Star Trek? The campaign that ressurected the cancelled original series is what inspires all of these latter-day fan-intervention imitators.

    2. Re:This has been done before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Roswell got another season due to a tabasco campaign. The aliens were partial to tabasco sauce and sent little bottle to the studio.

      I can't remember but I think Once & Again had a viewer/fan driven extension.

      Star Trek, of course, was the ultimate "saved" show, if just for one more season.

      Typically where these work they fail because the network then tries to "tweak" a show to bring in more ratings and destroys it by making it something it never was meant to be (see also SeaQuest DSV -> SeaQuest 2032).

    3. Re:This has been done before by DarkZero · · Score: 2

      Star Trek. Once and Again, for a time. Roswell, for an additional season on another network. Forever Knight, which was revived twice after it was cancelled after both its first and second seasons. I'm pretty sure Buffy the Vampire Slayer was, because tons of mail was sent to UPN urging them to pick it up after The WB dropped it after its fifth season. And I'm also pretty sure that the Freaks and Geeks campaign sort of worked... weren't previously unaired episodes aired after the campaign, completing the first season?

      This is done every time a show is cancelled. The difference is that only the shows with a truly dedicated fanbase survive. Farscape might have that.

    4. Re:This has been done before by Babbster · · Score: 3, Informative

      Good examples except one: Buffy the Vampire Slayer was dropped because Mutant Enemy wanted more money per episode than the WB was willing to pay - UPN picked it up before any groundswell of fandom had a chance to build up. No fan intervention necessary. UPN felt that they needed more than one franchise show (Enterprise), so they were willing to pay the green necessary. The WB, on the other hand, still had Angel to keep a lot of Buffy fans watching, Smallville getting a following, and had Birds of Prey in their sights (a WB property via DC, as is Smallville) - I think they figured BoP would meet their "hot fighting chick(s)" requirement.

    5. Re:This has been done before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A dedicated fanbase doesn't make a show survive--they make a network give the show another chance and, as you've pointed out, that chance rarely works out.

    6. Re:This has been done before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I think a show is only being watched by 10000 people and I decide to cancel it based on that number then what would I be thinking if 10000 people write in to say they want the show back and I decide to do it? There needs to be something to change the reason the show was cancelled in the first place--with Farscape, ads won't do it because it was hyped on the radio and on other networks.

      You make a good point though...the fans should be careful what they wish for.

    7. Re:This has been done before by DarkZero · · Score: 2

      Nah. It works out enough to give the show some closure, or maybe even another one or two story arcs, which is all that the sane fans are really asking for. No one expects a cancelled show to go on for another four or five seasons. All that most people expect is another season or just another handful of episodes, like the eight episodes that La Femme Nikita got to close out its plot.

    8. Re:This has been done before by JakiChan · · Score: 1

      Well, when La Femme Nikita ended really badly on USA the fans went nuts. The fan reaction resulted in a 9 episode "mini-season" which served to wrap things up in a way that fans liked better. Not as good as a full return, but it was a nice reaction by USA to the fans.

      --
      "Where quality is like a dead stinking rat - you just can't miss it."
    9. Re:This has been done before by milovoo · · Score: 1

      How's your history?

      Bjo Trimble is on board for this one too.

      http://www.bjotrimble.com/current.htm

      sheesh, it was only 1967.

      -milo

    10. Re:This has been done before by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      Heh. And I was about to post a sarcastic comment of "yeah, but Trek had Bjo Trimble". Suddenly Farscape's chances look quite a bit better in my eyes. Bjo is one *hell* of a woman, one of the legends of fandom.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    11. Re:This has been done before by NeMon'ess · · Score: 2

      When NBC cancelled The Pretender, there was enough fan support to convince the producer of the show to make several two-hour mega-episodes/mini-movies which continue the plot.

  7. really, now.... by nostromo_42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In many of those cities, the ad may air only once, and it may be in the middle of the night on an undisclosed channel.

    would it take that much extra work for them to specify which channel, or at least which network it's an affiliate of? i'm a little skeptical of the claim that "it doesn't matter what channel", since the mainstream media isn't exactly going to rush out headline stories about this unless people see it.

    1. Re:really, now.... by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree that it would be nice of them to list channels and times (harder) that they've bought for the spot.

      You are dead wrong on the fact that the "mainstream media isn't exactly going to rush out headline stories about this unless people see it." CNN - which we can all agree here is about as mainstream as you can get, right - has already aired two 'lengthy' stories on the fan response to the show being cancelled. This was done when there were websites first popping up and the letter-writing campaigns were just getting started. If I recall correctly, there were stories in many other places as well. So, it stands to reason, that fans caring enough to produce (even supposedly amatuerish) commercials for *any* television series will be news. It really is groundbreaking in the history of television if you think about it.

      Still, I'm skeptical the show will be granted an extended lifetime for other reasons....

    2. Re:really, now.... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      bah, it amazes me how many people know absolutely nothing about ad insertion...

      Yes they bought 1 Ad slot on one channel at the cheapest time slot. what that does is shovew them into the "auto fill" pool. you notice the Ad's for cable tv? or that local station? Those are filler ad's to fill up spots that were not sold. if one paid customer get's sold on that channel in a contract that specifies that they dont care when they get aired and autofill is ok... they will be airing like crazy on every network they have 1 spot on.

      It's a stroke of genius on the part of the person that though of buying their ad'space that way.. and the funniest part.... Sci-Fi is a tier 3 channel and is almsot one of the cheapest to buy ad' insertion on.. and cince they are cable... just buy the ad' space from a cable company... flip Sci-fi the bird.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:really, now.... by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      bah, it amazes me how many people know absolutely nothing about ad insertion...

      Why on Earth would anyone (who doesn't work in a related industry) know _anything_ about ad insertion?

  8. Awareness by faeryman · · Score: 3, Funny

    I walk around in leather and say I'm a Peacekeeper and try and drum up interest in the show. It doesn't work that well though..people just smack my ass, so I'm all for the new TV commercial to succeed in getting people interested.

    --


    ,
    faeryman
  9. how it will be saved by Drunken+Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Apparently, the only way Farscape will be saved is if UPN picks it up for season five. This will only happen if the remaining season four episodes get high ratings, which doesn't seem likely without publicity. So write to UPN and encourage non-geek friends (or those who happen to have Nielson boxes in their homes) to watch the show.

    --
    Have you been stalked by Seth today?
    1. Re:how it will be saved by kingkade · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Well, one sure way to have UPN pick it up is to change the cast of characters entirely to African American actors.

      Then again, they do carry Enterprise...

    2. Re:how it will be saved by Hummercash · · Score: 1

      UPN was supposed to pick up Family Guy too, but it never happened. Too bad, FG RULES! Guess I'll just have to wait for the FG 3 season box set ;) .//chris

    3. Re:how it will be saved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe that's why it's closing. It's a show appealing to geeks. They watch it, love it and just download the DIVX-rips.

      Karma is good for you.

  10. No Ellen. by SYFer · · Score: 1

    Julie is no Ellen.

    --
    "...all the labours of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness..." yada yada
  11. They need a catchier line by DarkHelmet · · Score: 2, Funny
    That just won't do... How about:

    Farscape:
    Because botox on vulcans is illogical.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    1. Re:They need a catchier line by hplasm · · Score: 1
      Because botox on vulcans is illogical.

      Yeah. Look what it did to the Klingons.

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
    2. Re:They need a catchier line by eve11 · · Score: 1
      There were a few suggestions floating around. My favorites:
      • "Love, War, and Weapons of Mass Destruction." (was axed b/c of the current political climate)
      • "Even the Muppets Get Some."
      • "Chicks. Guns. Not the Sopranos."
  12. It's very ironic by JessLeah · · Score: 5, Interesting

    that the first "grassroots" (as opposed to "astroturf" ;) ) protest commercial I've ever heard of involves Farscape. I've heard a lot of good things about this show-- but still, where are the "the environment is going to pot and the politicians don't care" protest commercials.. or the "drug companies are keeping patents to life-saving AIDS and cancer drugs under lock and key, while millions die" protest commercials?

    I'd love to hear about (I'll never see it unless someone puts it online, since I don't own a TV, nor do I want one) MORE protest work on TV. It's about time that the "little guys/gals" claimed their piece of the television pie. Nowadays, it seems that 90% of the content on TV is dictated by the Fortune 500 companies...

    Does anyone know of any other efforts to produce true 'grassroots' commercials like this?

    Personally, I would love to see a grassroots commercial that advocates re-opening the Federal case against MS. But hey, that's 'cuz I'm one of those evil Unix lovers your mom warned you about.

    Is there a 'grassroots marketing forum' anywhere?

    1. Re:It's very ironic by packeteer · · Score: 2

      Nowadays, it seems that 90% of the content on TV is dictated by the Fortune 500 companies...

      hate to break it to you but its about 3 companies that own 90% of it all... kinda gross...

      i wonder if one company owns more than 1% of all the web content?

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    2. Re:It's very ironic by JessLeah · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, it's not really relevent what percentage of the Web is owned by any given c orporation (or set of corporations). What's relevent is what percentage of total minutes/page views of actual Web surfing time of any given body of users is spent on corporate sites.

      I have a sneaking suspicion that there are millions of people out there who wake up in the morning, read their (AOL) e-mail, go to www.cnn.com (also owned by AOL) to get their news, go off to work and read msnbc.com (Microsoft) and time.com (more AOL), occasionally dipping into si.com (yet more AOL). Then they go home and load up their copy of AOL Instant Messenger (no, not Trillian, not gAIM-- the actual real deal from AOL, complete with annoying adverts) and chat with their friends, who tell them about something they read in (insert AOL-owned magazine) today...

      And so on, and so on.

      I'm sure that somewhere in the US, there is a person who gets 95 or more percent of all the information they partake of (in media form, perhaps even including movies) from AOL/Time Warner.

    3. Re:It's very ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:It's very ironic by indiigo · · Score: 2

      http://www.adbusters.org

      The have tried several times to get spots on CNN and other media formats, with very little reception.

      --
      fslg503-985-8686503-985-8686503-985-8686503-985-86 8650 3-985-fdsg8686503-985-8686503-985-8686503-9
    5. Re:It's very ironic by JessLeah · · Score: 1

      If they're getting little reception, maybe they should adjust the rabbit ears on the TV... (DUCKS)

      Okay, okay, dated joke ;)

    6. Re:It's very ironic by packeteer · · Score: 3, Informative

      AOL/Time Warner is very bad but there are 6 coprorations that is considered to own pretty much all media the average american gets. AOL/Time Warner, Viacom, News Corp., Disney, General Electric and Bertelsmann are the companies in no order. 5 years ago it was about 10 companies and 20 years ago there was 50. You can find a list of who owns what in the world of big business. Just look at the freakishly long list that is owned by only Viacom.

      It makes me glad i dont watch tv. Although slashdot is no suppliment for an all enclusive news source it sure fills the most time of my news reading in a day.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    7. Re:It's very ironic by JessLeah · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And even sicker is that anyone who dares protest this state of affairs is branded a "communist" or a "hippie".

      This is not how capitalism is supposed to be.

      We need a sound balance of capitalism and socialism-- and a heavy dose of fairness. Unfortunately, lots of people do not have the Buddha-nature and are quite selfish and greedy. (And I'm sorry, I don't care how much of your $billions you gave away to charity, BillG, wanting/insisting upon 100% market share in every market you touch does make you "quite selfish and greedy").

    8. Re:It's very ironic by WhaDaYaKnow · · Score: 2

      I don't own a TV, nor do I want one

      Followed by:

      it seems that 90% of the content on TV is dictated by the Fortune 500 companies...

      Alrighty then :-) You just picked that up from waiting at the bus-stop in front of Circuit City I bet, uh? ;-)

    9. Re:It's very ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If people want reurgitated garbage, let them have as much as they want to choke on. Sooner or later, more and more people will realize what they're doing.

    10. Re:It's very ironic by JessLeah · · Score: 2

      No. No, they won't. They would have already.

      I think you grossly overestimate the intelligent/sophistication/wisdom of the average human being.

      Go pick a random 25-year-old college grad and try to bring up any topic not related to sports, sex, beer, fashion, movies, celebrities or currently popular music. You'll see very quickly what the core of the problem is.

    11. Re:It's very ironic by CommieLib · · Score: 2

      How about a "doctors are selfishly spending time away from the hospital when they could be saving lives" protest commercial?

      Scarcity sucks.

      --
      If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
    12. Re:It's very ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, you've managed to miss all of thetruth.com's ads?

  13. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  14. Natural selection... by GundyRage · · Score: 1

    ...pays no attention to commercials.

  15. Commercial Will Reach Wrong Audience by fuzdout · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Unfortunately for the FS fans, more than likely their efforts won't work and if anything cause a lot of snide and humorous jokes about their commercials on SNL, Jay leno and such. Even if simply because the lack of quality.

    It's nice that they are willing to try and make a point about their dedication but it probably will just reach the average TV viewers and NOT anyone in control of FS's life-span.

    --
    Fuzdout
    ..My sig ran away. Has anyone seen my sig?
    1. Re:Commercial Will Reach Wrong Audience by Sarcasmooo! · · Score: 2

      A TV commercial trying to publicize the search for a TV network to save farscape.......that has to be approved and aired by TV networks.......won't reach the right people.....?

    2. Re:Commercial Will Reach Wrong Audience by keyed · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately for the FS fans, more than likely their efforts won't work and if anything cause a lot of snide and humorous jokes about their commercials on SNL, Jay leno and such. Even if simply because the lack of quality.

      It's nice that they are willing to try and make a point about their dedication but it probably will just reach the average TV viewers and NOT anyone in control of FS's life-span.
      It'd be great if they did get the snide comments and humorous jokes on TV shows. That'd be the best type of advertisement for saving the show. Unfortunately, it won't have much of an impact because while it might attract the interest of an average viewer for a while, there's nowhere for them go to easily see the show as it's not being aired atm, not even as a rerun. Oh, they might rent the dvds at Blockbuster, but at two episodes per dvd, noone's going to go nuts over the series if they have to pay $4 to watch 2 episodes.
    3. Re:Commercial Will Reach Wrong Audience by fuzdout · · Score: 1

      They have to approve it, sure. But they're not going to sit there and watch it thinking "gee, we should bring FS back.."

      It'd simply be any other commercial to them. Think about it, everytime a Budweiser commercial has to be approved doesn't cause them to think "we all should be drinking this stuff!"
      Networks have a lot of commercials to filter through and aren't sitting there letting each one if ANY have personal effects on them.

      --
      Fuzdout
      ..My sig ran away. Has anyone seen my sig?
    4. Re:Commercial Will Reach Wrong Audience by fuzdout · · Score: 1

      True. And unfortunately causing more average viewers aren't going to help at this point (they should have done something to promote a bigger fan base BEFORE it was cancelled if they were aware it was going down the tube to begin with) what they need is to REALLY get the NETWORKS to try and pick-up the show again which I doubt the commercial will do.

      Thing is, Networks have always had a hard time with the Sci-Fi genre if they can find something non-sci-fi to replace a sci-fi they will, from what I have observed. Part off this is because there is so little GOOD Sci-Fi that doesn't enbarass the genre. And that last statement I've actually read them saying in TV Guide.

      --
      Fuzdout
      ..My sig ran away. Has anyone seen my sig?
  16. Link by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

    A-ha, they do in fact have a link to the commercial itself -- hosted at mac.com, I note with pride. (Yeah, I dropped my account like most people when they started to charge, but still.)

    Gee, I'm glad these people are all Farscape, but what does this prove? Also, I suspect they didn't write their own lines other than the [insert name here].

    I repeat my earlier "insightful +5" assertion that Farscape rocks. It is a professional, cool, well-written alternative to the ST rut and the Star Wars commercial nightmare. And is has real characters people care about. Don't we all want to see the Scarrans whupped?

  17. Someday in the future... by T.+Will+S.+Idea · · Score: 1

    People will talk about what sheep we used to be, sitting in front of the television and waiting for whatever crap the networks chose to shovel in our direction. And then came cable; the internet; Tivo; grass roots fan sites; leeching our favorite episodes from usenet, IRC and p2p...

    The day of the networks and the suits is over. Soon, very soon we the consumers will be in control.

    --
    If electricity is produced by electrons is morality produced by morons?
    1. Re:Someday in the future... by Howie · · Score: 1

      Nice utopian vision, but at what stage do you contribute to the production costs of the show when using p2p/irc/usenet to get it?

      When the network goes away, there is no show because there is no money. Substitute cable station for network if you like - it's a different (if you're lucky) large company that doesn't care what you want.

      --
      "don't fall into the fallacy of believing that Perl can solve social problems. Maybe Perl 6 can, but that's a ways off"
    2. Re:Someday in the future... by antistuff · · Score: 1

      we the consumers....that bothers me....

    3. Re:Someday in the future... by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, that's the truth.

    4. Re:Someday in the future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hee hee...what makes you think that you are a consumer of TV? As part of the audience you are the PRODUCT that TV sells to the companies that buy the commercials. As the value of TV gets diluted by the things you mentioned, then the profit lessens and fewer programs with high production costs get produced--why do you think there are so many 'news' programs (60 Minutes, 20/20, etc) and 'reality' programs?

      If we see any SF at all it'll tend toward cheesy production-value shows like Dr. Who in the '60s. Cheers!

  18. Only fools would pass on picking up this show by blincoln · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, has *any* series ever gotten this kind of rabid support? Even Babylon 5 didn't inspire loyalty on the same level.

    Since I don't have cable, I never saw FarScape, but any marketing department in their right mind would kill to have fans so willing to spend their money on a given product that they'd pay for their own ads to be aired.

    If SciFi was concerned about profitability, they should have started cranking out the merchandise, because this is a bunch of people who are obviously willing to put their money where their mouths are.

    --
    "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    1. Re:Only fools would pass on picking up this show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if you started at the beginning of the series, or just jumped right in the middle. The series are really great, more spiritual than Star Trek and less techno-jumbo. You need to see it from the first episodes though.

      Of course, not everyone HAVE to like it. Personally I'm not a Babylon 5 fan: It's just talk, talk, talk, talk, talk, talk, booooring!

      You probably like it to be more "realistic", so you hate Farscape. But that's okay, I personally like the creativeness and good use of SGI in the series - not too much and not too little.

    2. Re:Only fools would pass on picking up this show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not fools, just look at Microsoft. It's very lucrative to piss off your customers while luring them into your trap with other stuff. Basically, people lose all rationality when they don't get what they want. Then they start to watch every TV-show, in hope that one of them will be as good as Farscape.

      A rational mind would just turn off the TV and stop paying for cable.

    3. Re:Only fools would pass on picking up this show by ajs · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Babylon 5's fan base was quite active and vocal, but there was no need for the sort of attention-getting that one has to go through to get a show put back on the air. For the most part, with Babylon 5 the largest problem fans had was getting syndicators to show it in a stable time-slot, and that was done market-by-market.

      So, I think you're comparing apples-to-oranges when you say, "Even Babylon 5 didn't inspire loyalty on the same level".

      Speaking of which, I just got my B5 DVDs in the mail for season 1. I'm going to see if I can get some decent video-editing software and create that 3-hour "all you need to know about season 1" tape that I've been threatening. It's basically:

      Midnight on the Firing Line -- Large chunks
      Soul Hunter -- A bit, mostly intro
      Born to the Purple, Infection, The Parliament of Dreams -- A few scenes
      Mind War -- Intro of bester
      The War Prayer -- Bits
      And The Sky Full Of Stars -- Some of the war
      Deathwalker -- Ending
      Believers -- Bits
      Survivors -- Bits
      By Any Means Necessary -- None, I think
      Signs and Portents -- 30 min or so
      TKO, Grail, Eyes, Legacies -- None, I think
      A Voice in the Wilderness part 1 & 2 -- Bits
      Babylon Squared -- Bits about B4
      The Quality of Mercy -- Bits
      Chrysalis -- 30 min or so

      I can edit that down to 5 hours easily, 3 hours if I'm very, very harsh about cutting out stuff that is amazingly cool and interesting, but not part of the B5 story arc.

      When I do, I'm going to get all of my friends who keep saying "I'd love to watch, but I don't have time" and strap them to chairs for 3 hours :)

    4. Re:Only fools would pass on picking up this show by JaDigger · · Score: 1

      I've heard about Farscape action figures, but haven't seen them.

      What I have seen is the computer game that was just released. It's a cheesy throw-together, completely wasting the branding.

      Not sure if SciFi channel would even get merchandising profits; I think Hensen gets all of it.

    5. Re:Only fools would pass on picking up this show by Mr+Fodder · · Score: 1

      I'd /love/ to spend my money on Farscape! It's the only reason I keep cable TV. Once it's off the air I'm cancelling my cable and won't look back. But do you think I can find the season 1 DVD set anywhere in Kelowna, BC? (Not a small town by any means)? It's like they don't even want my money.

    6. Re:Only fools would pass on picking up this show by blincoln · · Score: 2

      So, I think you're comparing apples-to-oranges when you say, "Even Babylon 5 didn't inspire loyalty on the same level".

      What I was thinking of is when B5 was going to be cancelled at the end of Season 4. People wrote letters and so forth, but they didn't pay for their own ads. IMO the only reason it ended up getting the final season was that Ted Turner liked it.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    7. Re:Only fools would pass on picking up this show by ajs · · Score: 2

      The thing was, we'd gotten the story we wanted. Farscape could go on for decades and never end. B5 was designed to be a single story, and while it was initially 5-years long, Straczynski cut it down to 4 mid-season 4 because of the chance that it would get cancelled. One of the reasons that so many fans are *not* fans of the 5th season is that it has very little in the way of story left to tell. He'd filmed the final episode of Season 5 during season 4, and all that was left was tell the story of how we got there.

      I ranted to my local station at the time, but I never bothered to get involved when it came to season 5. I was happy with what I'd gotten and there were rumors of a big-screen movie to keep me happy.

      Of course, the landscape has changed a lot. If you want good, continuity-based storytelling, you can watch Aaron Sorkin's shows, Joss Whedons or even Straczynski's on Showtime. Back then, B5 was it, and while it was sad to see it go, I think season 4 would have been a more graceful exit.

    8. Re:Only fools would pass on picking up this show by Caffeine+Pill · · Score: 1

      "If SciFi was concerned about profitability, they should have started cranking out the merchandise..."

      Just FYI, this is one of the reasons it's (suspected) that SF dropped the show. The show is produced by Henson - therefore all rights to that show go to... yep, Henson.
      Basicly it cost about 1.4 mil per ep to make. Henson footed half, SF half. SF got exclusive rights to air (no syndication) for a couple years so they had an immediat turn around. Henson gets the rights to syndicate the show and sell merchandise.
      From Sci-Fi's point of view, it's better to air psychic guy for an hour at couple hundred K an ep then Farscape at 700K. Look at it as cost per viewer for them.
      Oh yeah, I am Farscape! =)
    9. Re:Only fools would pass on picking up this show by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2

      If they'd cancelled Babylon 5 after season 3 or so, you bet there'd have been a very active fanbase pleading for it to continue. Much more so than Farscape, I'd imagine, becasue Babylon5 is all one long continuous story. (Except for when JMS was told he'd have to hurry up and finish by season 4 because he wasn't going to get 5 seasons like he thought, and so he did speed up the plot to finish it, and then got season 5 awarded to him after all, which then ended up feeling like a drawn-out epilogue instead of an integral part of the story, because he'd hurried up an finished the interesting stuff in season 4.)

      The big difference between B5 and Farscape here isn't fan loyalty, its that one was in a situation of having the show cancelled, and the other was in a situation of having the show end its run in the way the scriptwriter wanted it to, so it felt "done".

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    10. Re:Only fools would pass on picking up this show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I thought farscape was the best Cable had to offer I would have cancelled it a long time ago.

    11. Re:Only fools would pass on picking up this show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to get all of my friends who keep saying "I'd love to watch, but I don't have time" and strap them to chairs for 3 hours

      Please, for the love of god, NO! I wouldn't wish that on my worst enemies, but you'd do it to your friends!?!?!?!

      That much bad acting distilled into 3 hours will cause them to go mad!

    12. Re:Only fools would pass on picking up this show by ajs · · Score: 2

      I was never a fan of Michael O'Hare's or Claudia Christian's acting, but you have to admit that Mira Furlan, Andreas Katsulas and Peter Jurasik did an amazing job, even through all of the makeup and given the occasionally bad dialog that plagued the "off" episodes of the first season.

      Take a look at Signs and Portents, Chrysalis and The Coming of Shadows for examples of just how good television can be when the likes of these actors team up with the likes of JMS at his writing peak.

  19. The Story So Far... by Soulslayer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Strange Horizons had a great write-up on the corporate shuffling that has killed Farscape.

    Personally I think Vivendi-Universal/Sci-Fi Channel has sorely miscalculated the resolve of the highly technical and intelligent Farscape fanbase. Despite the explosion of tech industry careers at all levels and the susequent rise in demand for genre programming no one has really provided quality television for them. The watchable genre shows can be counted on one hand. Of them Farscape was the most consistently daring and well written, appealing to wide (by sci-fi standards) demographic. I don't think Vivendi and company realized exactly how attached this fairly ignored market segment felt to that show. The longer they hold out, the more foolish they look.

    --


    Once more unto the breach dear friends...
    1. Re:The Story So Far... by clarkc3 · · Score: 1

      I'd definitely agree with you, but one thing I hated with sci-fi and the show was its time slot - they pretty much made it impossible for people who go out on fridays to watch without having to record it and then they complained about the lower # of people watching it.

    2. Re:The Story So Far... by bashibazouk · · Score: 1

      The first season or two the time slots were good. Sometimes you would come back from Friday night adventures to catch the midnight showing but usually I would watch it on Saturday morning at 10. Farscape is a great show to watch while you're nursing a hangover.

  20. Expletive Deleted by wahay · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    We have laws in this country which allow prior restraint of publication for materials which a company claims it has a copyright for. The government is building a database of information about you, run by a convicted felon, in order to protect your "safety". The FBI confiscates the computers of your neighbors when the cable company accuses them of service theft. Habeas Corpus is suspended for U.S. citizens who are accused of 'terrorism', while the C.I.A. uses unmanned drones firing missiles to assassinate 'terrorists' that have been tried in no court of law. The country is run by a man who was elected purely by fraud, and the news media doesn't bother to report that in the 2002 elections (this month!) more than 100,000 legal ballots weren't counted in Florida (again!).

    So, erm, yah. Farscape Rocks! It shouldn't be canceled. I love the cute girls in tight outfits and funny muppets. And Crichton is so funny when he quotes pop culture while talking to the imaginary gimp in his head. LETS MARCH THROUGH THE STREETS! We need Farscape back on air more than anything else. It is the most important thing ever.

    1. Re:Expletive Deleted by spectecjr · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We have laws in this country which allow prior restraint of publication for materials which a company claims it has a copyright for. The government is building a database of information about you, run by a convicted felon, in order to protect your "safety". The FBI confiscates the computers of your neighbors when the cable company accuses them of service theft. Habeas Corpus is suspended for U.S. citizens who are accused of 'terrorism', while the C.I.A. uses unmanned drones firing missiles to assassinate 'terrorists' that have been tried in no court of law. The country is run by a man who was elected purely by fraud, and the news media doesn't bother to report that in the 2002 elections (this month!) more than 100,000 legal ballots weren't counted in Florida (again!).


      If you care so much about those things, start a campaign. Maybe take a few pages from the Save Farscape campaigns books and follow their lead.

      Meanwhile, don't diss other people for putting their passion to good use. Is this as important as those other things? No. Does that give you the right to complain that people are wasting their time on it? No - it's their time, not yours.

      That's the whole point of America. It's meant to be a free country -- which means We choose what We want to do.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    2. Re:Expletive Deleted by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      Okay, lets take this one point at a time.

      "We have laws in this country which allow prior restraint of publication for materials which a company claims it has a copyright for."
      Yes, we do. If not, I could publish copyrighted materials in any format I wanted, including ways that massively devalued both those copyrights and related ones, and all the legal owner could do would be to attempt to clean up the mess. By having preventative means such as this, we protect intellectual property.

      " The government is building a database of information about you, run by a convicted felon, in order to protect your "safety"."
      Who's the convicted felon, again? More importantly, whats the point of a criminal system if we dont believe the freed man is reformed? Further, you aren't providing any argument that indicates such a database wouldn't help protect people. You may think its a fair assumption, but no trained thinker would agree.

      "The FBI confiscates the computers of your neighbors when the cable company accuses them of service theft"
      So I'm not clear, are you saying that the FBI should be unable to seize evidence in a criminal investigation of theft? These people distorted equipment to receive a service which they did not pay for from the cable company. They were attempting to steal, just as much as if I climbed up a pole and illegally connected a wire into the cable box. Wake up, just because a big company complains, doesn't mean they're being immoral. In fact, the perpetrators here were being immoral, if not outright criminal.

      "Habeas Corpus is suspended for U.S. citizens who are accused of 'terrorism', while the C.I.A. uses unmanned drones firing missiles to assassinate 'terrorists' that have been tried in no court of law"
      Habeas Corpus wasn't violated for a single person. No one (literally zero individuals) have reported that they were held for any innapropriate amount of time. Those detained were those who statistically bore a possiblility of connection, and were released within one day. Its always legal to do this: thats why the police may arrest you and hold you for up to 48 hours (depending on the state) before releasing you, even if no crime is charged. Following such an event, you're legally enabled to charge them with false-arrest. You'll notice that not a single person who was so detained believed it was an illegal arrest, hence there not being a single such charge. You just assume there was, despite there being no evidence. Now as to the targets of the CIA: they're not American citizens! In fact, they're members of a group of people who have openly declared war upon the United States. Just because they lack a physical homeland to call their "country" whom we can negotiate with, doesn't mean they get to be free from reprisal. They made a criminal act by commiting an act of war against us, now they're reaping the consequences. You don't start something you're unwilling to finish.

      "The country is run by a man who was elected purely by fraud, and the news media doesn't bother to report that in the 2002 elections (this month!) more than 100,000 legal ballots weren't counted in Florida (again!)."
      Bush wasn't elected by fraud at all. I personally (i.e. physically) assisted in the recounting of the ballots in Florida (due to my affiliation with the Miami Herald, the paper whichc onducted it). I can promise you - Bush actually won. Gore, despite my best desires (I voted for him) lost the vote. Sure, he got the popular vote, but the US government has never been determined by the popular vote. Its always been the way it is now: representative democracy through the electoral college, all of whom voted according to their constituencies. As to the current elections in my home state, I was disapointed that my candidate (McBride) lost to Bush, but thats life. People lose, people win.

      Grow up buddy, stop whining about things that didn't happen, and start working towards fixing these massive problems you find with the world.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    3. Re:Expletive Deleted by wahay · · Score: 1

      You're an idiot. But for the record...

      Yes, we do....By having preventative means such as this, we protect intellectual property.
      Prior restraint is not a method for protecting property. Prior restraint is an authoritarian measure to keep people down. You're the type that believes that we shouldn't allow people outside after dark, because they might commit crimes. What are you defending here?

      Who's the convicted felon, again?
      Admiral John Poindexter. Try and keep up.

      Further, you aren't providing any argument that indicates such a database wouldn't help protect people. You may think its a fair assumption, but no trained thinker would agree.
      Your argument is that I haven't presented a proof. Since I didn't claim to, you're poking at the air. Thanks for writing, though.

      So I'm not clear, are you saying that the FBI should be unable to seize evidence in a criminal investigation of theft?
      I'm saying that deliberate theft of equipment that was unrelated to the investigation and that, under our legal regime is used for the PROFIT of the law enforcment agency involved, whether there is a conviction or not, is wrong. They took the VCR! And were thinking of taking the guy's X-Box.

      Wake up, just because a big company complains, doesn't mean they're being immoral. In fact, the perpetrators here were being immoral, if not outright criminal.
      Although in this case it was clearly so. But let's not get the facts involved.

      Habeas Corpus wasn't violated for a single person. No one (literally zero individuals) have reported that they were held for any innapropriate amount of time.....despite there being no evidence.
      How many people were arrested? How long were they detained? What are their names? Our government withholding all information about legal proceedings is a violation of the basic principals of american law. Please. Defend it some more.

      Now as to the targets of the CIA: they're not American citizens!
      Again, try and keep up. An AMERICAN CITIZEN was killed by the CIA using a rocket launched from an unmanned drone. Without due process. (Not to mention that the constitution has typically been interpreted to apply to the actions of the government whether the government is acting towards citiziens or non-citizens. Morality is a constant, not just something we apply towards the 'good guys')

      Bush wasn't elected by fraud at all.
      I wish I could wear the rose-colored glasses too, but I keep informed instead. Here's some links about the last two elections. If you care to look, you'll find the fraud.
      http://www.gregpalast.com/
      http://www.tal ion.com/election-mistakes.html

      Grow up buddy,
      Done. Real adults pay attention to the world.
      stop whining about things that didn't happen,
      Done. Now will you stop defending the injustices that do happen? Or do you need it all to go away so you can sleep at night?
      and start working towards fixing these massive problems you find with the world
      Wouldn't it be nice if we all would. Then we wouldn't have to worry about being arrested without cause, our property stolen, our voice silenced, our friends blown up with rockets, and our future compromised by the devaluation of our involvement in the political process.

  21. Nielson and digital cable... by Sarcasmooo! · · Score: 2

    Does anyone happen to know whether or not digital cable customers get factored in when they measure ratings these days? I mean, I know they watch what the customers are watching. Why wouldn't it be?

    1. Re:Nielson and digital cable... by Gutzalpus · · Score: 2, Informative

      The only people that get "factored in" are the Neilsen families:

      http://www.nielsenmedia.com/FAQ/ratings.html#How do you figure out the ratings?

  22. Didn't follow the link, eh? by Russellkhan · · Score: 3, Interesting
    1. The commercial didn't remotely resemble your description.
    2. The only pretension here is yours. There was no namedropping in the commercial, but your first paragraph sure seemed full of it (pun intended).
    3. Just because you don't understand something (because you haven't bothered to try) doesn't mean it's an attempt at individuality.
    4. These people putting their time and money into supporting something they like. Is that too superior for you? Would the world be a better place if everyone took your attitude and just sat back and criticized everyone else if they tried to do something that challenged their tiny little worldview?
    5. Did it ever enter your mind that there are people out there who do things for reasons other than conformity or rebellion? No? Don't worry, in about 10 years, when you hit 25 or so you'll grow out of that attitude.
    6. Not even going to address the Windows/Linux part of your post - it's clear enough that it's nothing but a troll that refutation is unnecessary.
    --
    Information doesn't want to be anthropomorphized anymore.
    1. Re:Didn't follow the link, eh? by yatest5 · · Score: 1
      Er, not that I feel particularly strongly either way, but if you're going to mock someone for (supposedly) not going to the link, you could at least read their post.

      He said there would be 'namedropping' in the POSTS, he did not describe the commercial at all.

      So your first two points are a waste of time.

      --
      • Mod parent up! [a] by Anonymous Coward (Score:5) Thurs, June 31, @13:37
    2. Re:Didn't follow the link, eh? by Russellkhan · · Score: 1

      Yep, I misread. Realized it about 10 minutes after posting.

      I would have dropped point #1 and said slightly different stuff in point #2 if I'd read it correctly, but other than that I still agree with myself on the rest.

      --
      Information doesn't want to be anthropomorphized anymore.
    3. Re:Didn't follow the link, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah...#2 is right on. Some day the original poster will grow up and see that there are a lot of young people around--I first realized this upon seeing a Playboy playmate who wasn't born when I was of voting age--and that these young people, who will rebel in the same manner, will pick up on what was left by the previous rebellions. No need to complain about it...the youngsters don't appreciate it(most weren't even alive in the '70s) and the oldsters see you as a fool.

  23. Oh good Lord, isn't there a more worthwhile cause? by TrekCycling · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I mean, seriously. The govt. is spying on us now more than ever. The 4th Ammendment is being shredded. John Poindexter, a convicted felon, is now in charge of a major govt. spy project. Pigs are flying, Microsoft's off without even a slap on the wrist, we're about to go to war with Iraq and nerds are spending money to try to get Farscape back on the air. Am I missing something about the importance of Farscape? Clearly I must be, because I can think of... oh.... a million things more important.

  24. FarStoned by Ehsan · · Score: 4, Funny



    I was like.. watching a show.. on the tv... and it was like boom.. and then like.. the show was gone.. and I was like hmm? it devoured devoured.. my show.. and it was a really good show and I had to watch another show and it wasn't as good..

    it's kind of..

    .. a bummer

  25. A show? by jonr · · Score: 5, Funny

    An excerpt from the pilot:
    Crais is the captain of a command carrier ship belonging to a military empire known as Peacekeepers. Peacekeepers are an oppressive, human-like species known for keeping "peace" and "stability" with the use of brutality and military cunning. One of their jobs is the assassination and imprisonment of political dissidents and trouble makers.

    Hmm... haven't I seen this somewhere else recently...

  26. This has to be said... by SaxMaster · · Score: 1, Insightful

    GEEKIEST COMMERCIAL EVER

    Seriously, I've watched maybe 1 episode of Farscape. Its a fine show, but (1)It's not the last time that a good scifi series will air (2) There are MANY other causes (insert ANY anti-war/hunger/etc... effort here) that are far more worthy of the kind of attention that this TV SHOW is garnering. Fence-sitting junk like this is why I cant stand slashdot sometimes.

    --
    "Dancing is the vertical expression of a horizontal desire" --Robert Frost
    1. Re:This has to be said... by spectecjr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There are MANY other causes (insert ANY anti-war/hunger/etc... effort here) that are far more worthy of the kind of attention that this TV SHOW is garnering.

      Yet you're wasting your time posting on slashdot instead of supporting those far more worthy causes.

      Don't you think that's a bit hypocritical?

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
  27. Their Eyes Are Bigger Than Their Airwaves... by cribcage · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Another show which boasts rabidly loyal fan support bites the dust. Just yesterday, Comics2Film reported rumors that the Batman-inspired "Birds Of Prey" won't be renewed by the WB network.

    These networks need some perspective. They're never going to be NBC, and they're never going to produce "Friends." The absolute best they can hope for is to attract a couple of million die-hard fans, who tune in week after week -- guaranteeing a specific demographic to sell to advertisers.

    So, "FarScape" only attracted a bunch of geeks and nerds. That's what's called a "high-saturation demographic." Sure, it's not very appealing to advertisers trying to sell basketball shoes; but for the company selling video games, or computer software, or pocket protectors...advertising on "FarScape" is money well-spent. You're pitching to an audience which might be 90% favorable to your product -- as opposed to betting on the more mixed demographics watching, say, "Trading Spaces" or "Emeril Live."

    Old marketing adage: Figure out your strength, and play it. As long as these cable channels keep trying to compete with The Big Three, they're going to keep tripping over themselves.

    crib

    --

    Please don't read my journal
    1. Re:Their Eyes Are Bigger Than Their Airwaves... by Slowping · · Score: 1

      It's also possible that the execs realize their demographic are the geeks and nerds, and are using this as a publicity stunt to get more geeks to watch. What better advertisement than getting this on Slashdot and having thousands of other geeks to start watching because of a Slashdot story?

      - Fake cancellation
      - Get huge grassroots effort
      - Raise awareness in the very type of people that would want to watch this show (ie geeks and nerds)
      - Bring it back at the last minute, citing the grassroots effort
      - People cheer and watch even more avidly
      - People buy newly released merchandise to support the show even more
      - Profit

      I can only speak for Farscape, which really is a good show. I have also seen "Birds of Prey"... and... meh... very mediocre and unimaginative.

      --
      (\(\
      (^.^)
      (")")
      *beware the cute-bunny virus
    2. Re:Their Eyes Are Bigger Than Their Airwaves... by ParrotDroppings · · Score: 1

      Demographic, Schmemographic...

      A BIG ThankYou to the BBC for not interrupting a good show with smarmy commercials

      --
      Free ?! Does that mean I can't get a Discount ?!
      This message was /.'ed
    3. Re:Their Eyes Are Bigger Than Their Airwaves... by yy1 · · Score: 1
      So, "FarScape" only attracted a bunch of geeks and nerds. That's what's called a "high-saturation demographic." Sure, it's not very appealing to advertisers trying to sell basketball shoes; but for the company selling video games, or computer software, or pocket protectors...advertising on "FarScape" is money well-spent. You're pitching to an audience which might be 90% favorable to your product -- as opposed to betting on the more mixed demographics watching, say, "Trading Spaces" or "Emeril Live."
      They probably think we all have tivo's and replayTV's and such...
      --
      Because, sometimes they just have to touch the stove.
      -YY1
    4. Re:Their Eyes Are Bigger Than Their Airwaves... by OneShotUno · · Score: 1

      My 45 year old father, an old fashioned, far from a geek, diesel mechanic got into Farscape. Geeks and nerds weren't the only ones to watch Farscape.

  28. That's a very small focus of the show. by Sarcasmooo! · · Score: 2

    It's mostly centered around the predicament of John Crichton, who goes from a confused good guy lost in space, to a good guy wanting to get home, to a good guy pushed to the brink of insanity by enemies he never wanted to make, to a man pushed too far that'll do just about anything to get home, to a sort of apathetic guy who lost his way and doesn't care what happens, and finally the cynical hero type trying to get the job done.

    That's my synopsis anyway, and what I really think makes the show great. Then again, I just eat that kinda stuff up. To me it's Dirty harry, John McClain......Mel Gibson in Lethal Weapon 1.

  29. Alcoholics Anonymous by Cheese+Cracker · · Score: 3, Funny

    Did someone else get the feeling of an AA meeting when you watched the I Am Farscape commercial?

  30. coming to a grocer near you by !splut · · Score: 3, Funny

    Did anyone else interpret that headline as announcing a Farscape-sponsored commercial for fruits and veggies?

    "Farscape oranges. They're out of this world."

    --
    The angel in the oatmeal.
  31. Money, and all things like it by Thenomain · · Score: 5, Funny

    Personally, I wish these people could have saved the money in advertising costs to bribe a UPN exec. From looking at the commercials, it'd have to be a lower exec, maybe a kid in the mail room, but I think the money could have been better spent.

    --
    This now concludes our broadcast day.
    1. Re:Money, and all things like it by kwdmb · · Score: 1

      I think the main focus of the ads is not to get to network executives but rather to get more media attention for "the cause". You can bet that there will be "Wow, they're willing to spend all that money!" stories written all over the country and those stories will get some level of attention from the networks AND the advertisers.

      -------
      The only difference between truth and fiction is that fiction has to make sense.

      --
      I only read /. for the sigs.
    2. Re:Money, and all things like it by Thenomain · · Score: 2

      Yeah, getting attention is good, but the ads come off as an unserious effort to me. TV spots are expensive, even without the production value (and if there was a production budget for these ads, I'd be interested to know how much). Even with low-rent equipment, these ads could have had a cohesive look and feel or even a decent white-balance.

      I don't mean to complain; I am a huge Farscape fan and will be doing my part to get as many TVs tuned in later this year, even in households where people plan to be absent during the show. I just ... wish they spent their money in other attention-getting ways. Of that I wasn't joking.

      It's all 20/20 hindsight, though, and I hope I'm wrong and these ads do pique much corporate interest -- which is, even if indirectly, what they are out to accomplish. I really do hope so.

      --
      This now concludes our broadcast day.
  32. Different applications of the same concept by shivianzealot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sitting here wondering why we Slashdotters aren't raising money to air our own awareness ads regarding DMCA, SSSCA, and other Bad Things. We need a geek lobby. Now.

    --

    Bored with karma, be a fan/freak

    1. Re:Different applications of the same concept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      --quote--
      I'm sitting here wondering why we Slashdotters aren't raising money to air our own awareness ads
      --end quote--

      --checks bank account balance--
      I think I can tell you why.

    2. Re:Different applications of the same concept by A+Rabid+Tibetan+Yak · · Score: 1

      I'm sitting here, commenting on the parent poster sitting there, and you're sitting somewhere else, reading Slashdot.

      Anyone else see the problem?

    3. Re:Different applications of the same concept by hvatum · · Score: 0

      We already have one. Its called the EFF. The EFF fights against the bad things; the free software foundation fights for the good things.

      --
      Netbooks, they come with Linux or a $3 copy of Windows. Either way, Microsoft loses.
    4. Re:Different applications of the same concept by GoofyBoy · · Score: 2


      Sure. Lets do it. Now.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    5. Re:Different applications of the same concept by chromatic · · Score: 1

      Why aren't you doing it? Answer my question and you'll have answered yours.

  33. LEXX by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

    All i could think of (and was hoping to see) was Xenia Seeberg from Lexx - when she does that commercail "This is Sci-Fi"

    Jeebus this girl is hot.

    1. Re:LEXX by Kurt+Russell · · Score: 1
      Jeebus this girl is hot.

      Dude, you need to make the I am Lexx commercial.

      Xev is so luscious.

  34. the commercial is a success! by herrd0kt0r · · Score: 3, Funny

    this commercial has already converted one person to tune in to farscape. how?

    all i gotta say is that if that graphic designer chix0r is farscape, then _i_ wanna be farscape too!

  35. Commercials.. by [cx] · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've seen commercials for Farscape made by people who _MADE_ the show and I wasn't interested. Some fan effort is going to lack funds, and therefore lack the effects and quality of the actual commercial(s).

    I hope that people find more innovative ways of trying to revive their old shows that quickly become cancelled because of the niche audience's problem with weekly viewing.

    I personally think the old spider man needs some new episodes, but is that going to happen? NO. If i made a commercial would anyone care? No.
    Maybe slashdot, but i think anything that goes away that was once nerdy and "unique"(same as the rest of those nerdy shows) is front line head page just to rally even more support to a lost cause.

    My advice, save the time, farscape didnt cut it. wait for the next show you like to come out and watch it get cancelled.

    Babylon 5 showed me that it doesn't matter how insanely popular a show is, it won't last.

    [cxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

    1. Re:Commercials.. by hplasm · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Babylon 5 showed me that it doesn't matter how insanely popular a show is, it won't last.

      True, but at least B5 was allowed to play to a logical ending point. (well, sort of logical...)

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
    2. Re:Commercials.. by kalidasa · · Score: 2

      Um, B5 was always intended to run only 5 years.

    3. Re:Commercials.. by UID30 · · Score: 1

      People who are impressed only by eye-candy fail to impress me. The grassroots commercial should be commended for a noble effort by loyal fans, not bashed as "not being flashy."

      Farscape was one of the 3 or 4 shows on my 130 channels that was worth watching. The people who said it had a lot of backstory are absolutely correct ... and that is the reason it gained such a loyal following. Quality scripts, a brilliant cast, and a "lets have fun" attitude gave this series some truely rememberable episodes. To this day, I say that nobody can act "insanity" quite as well as Ben Browder.

      I mourn the loss of the show.
      -

      --
      "Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." - Napoleon Bonaparte
    4. Re:Commercials.. by T.E.D. · · Score: 3, Informative
      Babylon 5 showed me that it doesn't matter how insanely popular a show is, it won't last.


      WTF are you talking about? Babylon 5 was going to be a five-year show from the start, and it ran for all 5 seasons. It ended after that not because it got canceled by network types, but because the story was over.
    5. Re:Commercials.. by hplasm · · Score: 1

      Exactly. This is what saves a series from rotting into a goo pond once the fire goes out of it. (OOO! MIX those metaphores!!)

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
    6. Re:Commercials.. by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 1

      The original Babylon 5 plot was only intended to last 5 years. The original story-line *finished* but IIRC somehow they were convinced to do a 6th season, which didn't really work.

    7. Re:Commercials.. by bay43270 · · Score: 2

      WTF are you talking about?

      He's probably talke about the fact that season 5 almost didn't get made... or that the second series only lasted a season... or the third never made it off the ground.
    8. Re:Commercials.. by kalidasa · · Score: 2

      Exactly. This is what saves a series from rotting into a goo pond once the fire goes out of it.

      And I think a five-year (22 episode year) run for Farscape would be just about right. (Or Enterprise. Or Voyager ... oops, too late.

      Glad we agree on that one.

    9. Re:Commercials.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you haven't got that quite right... yes babylon 5 was originally only intended to last 5 years, but that 5 year plot line got squished into 4 year in anticipation for no support for a fifth season.

      Then they did end up doing a 5th season... which was the last one and hadn't originally been planned out. You've added an extra year in there someplace, there was no 6th season.

  36. The clear ringing sound of common sense. by peterpi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Surely the TV companies know what's making them money and what's not? If the show was as good as all these fanatics claim it was then it wouldn't be getting canned in the first place.

    1. Re:The clear ringing sound of common sense. by visualight · · Score: 2

      Personally I think the people who run the sci-fi channel deliberately torpedoed the show.

      They run ads for sg-1 everyday. They hardly ever run ads for farscape.

      Sg-1 is on for like 16 hours a week. Farscape?

      They put farscape in the absolute worst timeslot there is - friday night at 10pm. At that time the world is asleep or well on their way to oblivion.

      I recently polled nearly all of my non-geek friends (I'm a commercial fisherman so I have a more than a few) and not a single one of them had ever heard of farscape. But they have all heard of sg-1.

      For the commercial though, they should of hired Chiana (gigi edgley), the

      sexiest.girl.ever.

      --
      Samsung took back my unlocked bootloader because Google wants me to rent movies. They're both evil.
    2. Re:The clear ringing sound of common sense. by ErikZ · · Score: 2


      "For the commercial though, they should of hired Chiana (gigi edgley), the sexiest.girl.ever."

      You do realize that she doesn't have a curve on her body, and that the appearance of breasts was solely a makeup trick?

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    3. Re:The clear ringing sound of common sense. by dandelion_wine · · Score: 1

      Um. Ok, I just checked out some pics of Gigi online, and I just want to ask: where do you get your drugs? Cause anything that can make you think Gigi Edgley is the sexiest girl ever could really do wonders for the women here.

    4. Re:The clear ringing sound of common sense. by Doppleganger · · Score: 2

      Hmm.. if only I had a working scanner, I could post up a copy of the nude poster of her that I have. She's really not all that bad, though a little thin and young-looking for my tastes...

    5. Re:The clear ringing sound of common sense. by patchmaster · · Score: 1
      They put farscape in the absolute worst timeslot there is - friday night at 10pm. At that time the world is asleep or well on their way to oblivion.
      Not to mention starting the new episodes in the middle of the northern hemisphere summer. Did they think people were going to stop going away for the weekend just because they put on some new Farscape episodes?
      Sg-1 is on for like 16 hours a week. Farscape?
      Another good point. No repeats of Farscape at all. Miss the 10pm Friday showing and you're out of luck.

      Maybe I'm missing something here, but why would a network take their most expensive show and put it on in one of the worst time slots available? I guess that's why I'm not a TV exec.

  37. i think u miss the poster's point... by zonker · · Score: 0

    he was making a crack at the current bush administration... not at the show.

    1. Re:i think u miss the poster's point... by Sarcasmooo! · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I got it. But I still wanted to point that out.

      Besides, that joke gets made about something about every 5 seconds.

  38. there is such a thing... by zonker · · Score: 0

    it's called the eff...

    1. Re:there is such a thing... by zonker · · Score: 0

      and i'm sure they would appreciate the money and help getting more attention, especially on tv...

  39. Nobody else sees this but me? by The+Rolling+Blackout · · Score: 5, Insightful
    A gang of geeks obsessed with their favorite TV show put out a broadcast-ready promo in order to keep it on the air.

    WTF. We can't do the same for the politicians we support or in opposition to those bills we know will create a totalitarian state in the U.S. A.?

    WTF again. Where are our FUCKING PRIORITIES? Farscape is just a little bit less important than preserving civil liberties of American citizens, and for that matter, the peace of the rest of the world. If for no other reason than to preserve the freedom of our (possible) children, we should be exerting these efforts in favor of STOPPING NIXON-ERA FORIEGN POLICY TACTICS and electing officials who will make this planet habitable for the next two centuries at the very least.

    Thank you for your time, I'm going to bed.

    --
    sig-free as of 28 July 02!
    1. Re:Nobody else sees this but me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Warning:

      You have considered ideas that are dangerous to society in its current form. Go eat a McDonalds, drink a Starbucks and think about what you've said.

    2. Re:Nobody else sees this but me? by dandelion_wine · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't mind seeing some public-funded attempts to break the strangle hold corporations have on the media. But political statements? So one group funds a commercial for... I dunno... gun control, let's say. They're gonna have a thousand/million people shouting down their throats and making their own commercial. Which leads to, what, exactly? Debate? No, more like public ranting. It's like when musicians publicly support political candidates... like that makes the candidate more right? Like the musician's vote is worth more than anyone else's because they hit the top ten?

      The difference with these fan-endeavors is that Charleton Heston isn't going to be starring in anti-Farscape ads in response. Although that would be cool.

    3. Re:Nobody else sees this but me? by derrickh · · Score: 2

      I'm sure your computer can edit video just as well as the Farscape fans can. So where's your foreign policy commercial?

      It's easy to say 'FUCKING PRIORITIES'. How about doing something about it. they did. So can you.

      D

    4. Re:Nobody else sees this but me? by milovoo · · Score: 2, Insightful


      It's easy to agree on something fairly harmless
      like bringing back a TV show. I can enjoy the
      company of other fans, even if they are republicans
      or what have you. I would not want the same group
      to decide issues of foreign policy or economics.
      (might be better, might be worse, but that's not
      the point)

      I agree that the whole planet is headed for the
      toilet, but after a long day of doing what I can,
      I like to put my feet up and watch something
      reasonably intelligent, and fictional.

      There are plenty of places that offer their take on the
      problem and propose solutions, you must decide on
      your own which of these you believe in and then go for it.
      (consider for example; the NRA, the EFF, PETA, the
      green party, the AFL-CIO, NOW, etc, etc, etc,)

      I suggest you learn how to spell "foreign policy" and
      switch to decaf, as it is now, you are difficult to take
      seriously, even with your good intentions. Then
      get out there and make a difference!

      -milo

    5. Re:Nobody else sees this but me? by bay43270 · · Score: 2

      This does bring up a good point though. How are we supposed to get our issues out there? The EFF just fights the court cases. Occasionally, someone shows up for an interview on Tech TV, but for the most part, they rely on word of mouth.

      Shouldn't there be a little more of a public awareness campaign for these issues (maybe something a little less grass-roots than the Farscape thing)?

    6. Re:Nobody else sees this but me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The difference with these fan-endeavors is that Charleton Heston isn't going to be starring in anti-Farscape ads in response. Although that would be cool.

      Of course he's not going to be starring in anti-Farscape ads.. not only does every character on the show carry a "pulse pistol", but the biggest f*cking gun in the universe was created from a "wormhole" in space to destroy a humongous enemy ship! The Death Star's got nothin' on that.

      Hell yeah! ;)

  40. DMCA is relevant to ordiinary people. by hughk · · Score: 2
    The Mickey Mouse(tm) protection act and the DMCA are both examples of legislation that affects everyone. I have seen some very good arguments here against both mentioned here and another place. Unfortunately those arguments are not reaching enough people.

    Farscape was a great show and I hope it will be brought back. Maybe some of the techniques used by the 'scapers will be interesting for us geeks on other themes like the above. Think of it, an ad showing someone being arrested for using a VCR!!!

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
    1. Re:DMCA is relevant to ordiinary people. by shivianzealot · · Score: 1
      Think of it, an ad showing someone being arrested for using a VCR!!!

      Maybe Bruce would like to volunteer?

      --

      Bored with karma, be a fan/freak

    2. Re:DMCA is relevant to ordiinary people. by zonker · · Score: 0

      i think a show on scifi channel would actually be a good spot for something like this... like back when zdtv (the precursor to todays techtv) did its c|net shows on there. however a show on, for lack of a better and non-weenie word for it, 'cyber' politics and culture would be a good platform to get these things out. kind of like the screen savers but industry and political issue driven.

  41. Have you seen that show? by Tottori · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It's dreadful! I can only assume the target audience are junkies. Thank God it was cancelled.

    --
    use constant PERL_IS_BROKEN => $] >= 5.006;
  42. OT NOT!!!! by hughk · · Score: 2
    I disagree with you but I disagree even more with the idiot who modded you down.

    The PK thread in Farscape is definitely reminiscent of the behaviour of various colonial powers up to and including the Bush government. Regrettably, entertainment may be the only way of campaigning against it. Michael Moore certainly didn't get very far did he?

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
    1. Re:OT NOT!!!! by wahay · · Score: 1

      Plenty of ways of campaigning against it: Our target is a small thermal exhaust port, right below the main port. The shaft leads directly to the reactor system. A precise hit will start a chain reaction which should destroy the station.

      But thanks for the positive comment. I think it's funny that I got modded one, but a shorter post is currently 5-insightful with the same content. Oh well.

  43. heh. by vilms · · Score: 0

    you know, I *never* get tired of reading this...

  44. I see what you did there... by vilms · · Score: 0

    "grassroots" / "astroturf"?

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

    Actually, you've made a very good point about the environment/AIDS'n'cancer drugs and now I feel slightly ashamed for scoffing at your weak pun.

    1. Re:I see what you did there... by ideonode · · Score: 1

      Weak pun? Entirely deliberate etymological association, methinks.

      I do believe that the very reason astroturfing is called as it is is because of its allusion to grass. Astroturf has fake grass roots. You see?

    2. Re:I see what you did there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, they're both accepted terms.

  45. NOT Troll by vilms · · Score: 0

    Very funny.

  46. "I am farscape" ... "I am free" ? by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1


    Maybe people should protect their freedom by making a commercial "I am free" or better said "I want to be free".

    The commercial could try (atleast) to warn other people of their freedom-at-stake ... Everybody is feeling free and protected in the "so-good-running-society" but are they free ? Far from if I read the latest headlines and watching the news.

    Everything around DMCA, uncappers-delight, Microsoft holding your systems hostage, all claims go to terrorism, ...

    I had a conversation with two Americans in the bar where I play music at and it seems they where really disgusted by the way the US is currently pushing the country on the television as if nothing is happening. All the news goes about "how good and free the US really is" and seems to be a very small time dedicated to the news of the rest of the world. When is this keep-everybody-dumb-mentality going to stop? Another thing for example is the discrimination at television. The society has all different kind of people, including gay people. Why are all gay presentators being pushed off television and prides being cancelled since the "new president" is "on the power" ? (I call it power because if you see what's getting pushed on lately ...)

    Sorry for any grammar errors because I am European myself and I do not like the way the world is going to. I am very scared of my future and also for the children next to me.

    Are you really free ? ...
    Are you sure ? ...

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
    1. Re:"I am farscape" ... "I am free" ? by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 2

      No, but who is? Freedom is a constant struggle.

      As far as US television being bad news coverage and nothing more than a means for painting a pretty picture of our lives so that the advertisers between stories can sell more products... no kidding! Try getting your news and information from other sources. The 'people' that own television news sources are in the entertainment business, not the information business.

      I do have a question - are three dudes at the bar drinking ale between hash hits talking about how bad the world is any more free than entertainment-obsessed television fanboys and fangirls putting their time and effort into doing something about that which they care about ("important" or not)? How so?

    2. Re:"I am farscape" ... "I am free" ? by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

      No we are not free .. I do not feel free ..

      though A lot of people think they are free while they are just prisoners of their own house and government.

      But that's a discussion that could result in many questions-and-answers. I just feel my freedom has been lost .. and I can't find it anymore whatever I am trying.

      --
      --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
    3. Re:"I am farscape" ... "I am free" ? by gladbach · · Score: 1

      you are not your fuggin khakis either i assume?

      --
      "Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms,
  47. Possible farscape Switch ad... by whiteranger99x · · Score: 3, Funny

    Here's one they need:

    I was watching a sci-fi show...

    and it was like...beep beep beep beep beep...

    and then...like...the entire show was gone...

    i was like..uh?

    sci-fi channel devoured it...it was a good show

    It's kind of...(long silence...) a bummer.

    I'm Ellen Feiss and I am a farscape fan!

    --
    Join the TWIT army now!
  48. What's with the soundtrack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's a campy remake of the Buck a Day computer song. Either that or reminiscent of a balding 37 year old at a nightclub.

  49. No, you're thinking of ... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2

    An excerpt from the pilot: Crais is the captain of a command carrier ship belonging to a military empire known as Peacekeepers. Peacekeepers are an oppressive, human-like species known for keeping "peace" and "stability" with the use of brutality and military cunning. One of their jobs is the assassination and imprisonment of political dissidents and trouble makers.

    Hmm... haven't I seen this somewhere else recently...

    No, you're thinking of the plot where the crazed billionaire loser convinces a bunch of young poor religious fanatic losers to be suicidal mass murderers, while he hides in the far reaches of the galaxy ....

    Easy mistake to make though.

  50. Re:Oh good Lord, isn't there a more worthwhile cau by hplasm · · Score: 1

    Where else can the resistance broadcast their messages in code??

    --
    ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
  51. it's a shame .. by ciupman · · Score: 0

    But money wasted on that comercial would be
    more well spent in sending food to Ethiopia!!
    Go and show that commercial there .. and they will send you a big Fu"#$ you!!
    It's like Red Hot say .. "Space is the ultimate frontier.. made in hollywood basement"

    Stop living in fiction ..

    And no .. i'm not a unhappy and sorrow person ..
    but realistic .. i like SciFi .. but this farscape subject has gone to the limit ..

    Flame me at will i don't care, i hope the post opens someones eyes ...

    -1 Flamebait

    --
    I fuse with Mercer every single day...
  52. The siding background by mrycar · · Score: 1

    If these producers where trying to be serious of these commercials. Shouldn't they have chosen more random backdrops to capture that impromptu in terview feel?

    Come on how many Farscape fans wander alongside of you white siding of your home?

    At least the plaza that was way overused looked neat.

    --
    Gator/Claria is Spyware.
  53. Farscape is already gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Dudes, they tore up the sets after the announcement to use the space for other things. They disassembled the animatronic pilot. There's nothing left to make a show with!

    1. Re:Farscape is already gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong....
      David Kemper saved the sets (in pieces) but the soundstage had to get freed up and Kemper made sure, Pilot, Rygel, weapons, most of Moya, the Farscape1 module all of it is saved.
      And he said to the fans , Farscape isn't dead..it's just on vacation. =)

  54. You know what's going to happen, don't you? by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

    They're going to show this commercial in the south and great confusion will ensue...

    "I am fire escape?? Wha??"

    To understand this joke it helps if you've spent time in the south...

    1. Re:You know what's going to happen, don't you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hilarious!
      Reminds me of the time I was told to look for a book about hurricanes called 'Towen Land'... (turns out it was 'torn land').

  55. Why save it? by Gray · · Score: 2

    I didn't think it was the great, and appearently Neilson families feel the same. Show's not making its rating targets, which means it costs more then it makes and nobody's doing this for art.

    "Gee mister advertiser, my show getting terrible rating, but all these nerds on the net promise they like it. Please pay me as if I was pulling real numbers, cause kinda weak SF shows don't pay for themselves ya know."

    Besides, I'm much more depressed about Futurama.

    1. Re:Why save it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The show got bad ratings because SCI-FI screwed it over with a BAD TIME SLOT!!!

    2. Re:Why save it? by fo0bar · · Score: 1

      I can see the commercial they'd make for saving Futurama -- "I am Bender, please insert girder."

      I've had that phrase in my head for the last week. Just got Season 2 on DVD from the UK.

  56. My first thought was... by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

    ...so this is what happens when a Beowulf cluster of Farscape fans get together. Then I read the article...

    The person who headed the effort and put the commercial together is nicked "Beowulf". I guess that's like those "Army of One" commercials...a "Beowulf of One" is trying to save Farscape.

  57. Farscape sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A crew of mentally crippled misfits that run around having sex with anything that appears to be a lifeform.

    1. Re:Farscape sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that I like farscape, but I think you are mixing up farscape with Lexx.

  58. It's worse than that.. by GrBear · · Score: 1

    It's dead Jim!

  59. We *have* a geek lobby by Spoing · · Score: 3, Informative
    We need a geek lobby. Now.

    There are actually multiple lobbies for tech related issues. Some are just starting out, though most have some efforts occuring right now.

    The first that has to be mentioned -- even if some moderator is hostile to it -- is the grandaddy Free Software Foundation, though there are others if that one is somehow not to your liking;

    Bruce Perens has 3 efforts at the Global Technology Policy Institute.

    The folks at The Linux Show often promote two efforts; GeekPac and American Open Technology Consortium

    ...and I'm sure that is not a complete list. If you can't support one, support one of the others.

    --
    A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    1. Re:We *have* a geek lobby by shivianzealot · · Score: 1

      There are actually multiple lobbies for tech related issues. Some are just starting out, though most have some efforts occuring right now.

      I guess the meat of my proposal had more to do with bringing these issues to the attention of the Banzai-Buddy using general public by expanding on what these Farscape fanboys are doing. Secondly, I expressed a wish for a "geek lobby."

      In hindsight, those are two different things. Airing an ad on your local news station saying "tell your congressmen not to vote for the ________ act which does ______ and will hurt you by ______" is different from going directly to the people with power potentially with our wallets open.

      Now, let me say, additionally, we very much need both of these things. Campiegn contributions from groups, at one level, will go a LONG way (further than any letters/fax/phone calls we Slashdotters could immediatly invoke) to making sure our voices are heard and taken into account. That is what I had immediately in mind when I spoke of the geek lobby.

      When I've brought issues like DMCA up with a friend (you guys are doing this too, right?), even the non-technical think they're horrible. We have the advantage of being the "good guys" in the eyes of anyone who doesn't own an Evil Corporation or believes the RIAA's Indoctrination. But this advantage is useless if people just don't know. This is where we emulate the followers of Farscape."

      --

      Bored with karma, be a fan/freak

  60. Re:channel 9 sucks for this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Channel Nine Australia is really bad when it comes to non-prime time. (Which on channel nine is essentially sports, news, 60 minutes type programs).

    They constantly decide to not play episodes for one week for apparantly no reason (the infamous back in two weeks time groaner). the shows are sometimes taken off for weeks at a time, with no advertising for when it returns. To top that off the shows rarely screen at their listed times. So if you tune in early you think it's not on this week, or if you tune in on time it started 10 minutes early. I don't think I've seen the first 5 mins of all but a handful of voyager episodes. Not just this show either. This applies equally to Enterprise, Voyager, DS9 (They are rotated seasonally), Smallville, Roswell, Farscape, etc.

    It has got to the point when I dread when a new show is advertised. The show had better bloddy be worth the hassle. I don't want to know how many roswell episodes I've missed.

    miffed.

  61. Re:channel 9 sucks for this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forgot to mention that all of these shows (except smallville) screen in the 10pm - 1:30am timeslot.

    1st series of Farscape was shown in prime time on a saturday (First season typically being the worst in a sci-fi show), then canned for ages. The only reason I knew it was back on, was that I just happened to be on the channel when it came on at 10:30pm.

  62. Didn't I just see a commercial for a new season? by motardo · · Score: 2

    I could have sworn that I saw a commercial for a new season of farscape. I thought to myself when I saw it "it ought to calm those fanboys/fangirls down". I guess that didn't happen either.

  63. Farscape by WillRobinson · · Score: 1

    I think it shows the current fanbase is very solid. I agree with posts below that it probably is due to non expansion of the fanbase, costs, ect.

    I feel while the commercial is a good idea, this one will not give any non fan a warm fuzzy feeling to do ANYTHING.

    What needs to be done, is make a commercial targeted two ways, one to get the current fans who have not written in to do so, and to get others who have not seen the show interested enough to say "what was farscape about?" .sig supplying intersteller warnings since stardate 10.10

  64. rant reaction by budalite · · Score: 1

    whatever

  65. Monumental waste of time by nule.org · · Score: 1

    In a world with starving children, people suffering the ravages of war, and so much intolerance and hatred over race, creed, gender, etc. - I find it hard to believe that this thing was so important to anyone. Granted, it's a free country and you have a right to spend your time and money how you like, but did anyone think about how much good that effort and money could have done if applied differently?
    I understand the sentiment - I would be bummed if Rowling decided to never publish another Potter book again, or if for some unexplicable reason the next two LotR movies were never released. I would hope that I could take that energy and turn it into something productive. Spend some time volunteering at the local hospital, teach some neighborhood kids the joy of reading. Send that money to the Leukemia foundation or even the EFF. Trade some of that short-term joy for a lasting legacy.
    Anyway, I guess whatever brings you joy.

    1. Re:Monumental waste of time by NoahsMyBro · · Score: 1

      On the one hand, yes, it's true the money & effort could have been used for more noble, benevolent purposes.

      On the other hand, however, this could be viewed as support of culture and art. I haven't watched enough Farscape to make that determination for myself, but it's a valid consideration.

      Of course, in every group there are always some people who feel no resources should be, in their opinion, wasted on endeavours like space exploration, culture/arts projects, entertainment ventures, etc... so long as there is poverty and suffering going on somewhere. I disagree.

      I believe that there is no chance, ever, that every single expenditure could be used to improve every poor soul's lot prior to funding something more 'frivolous'. Given that, I hope the less fortunate are helped wherever possible, but I don't begrudge efforts to pursue other achievements.

    2. Re:Monumental waste of time by nule.org · · Score: 1

      That is a good point you make. I guess I have a real hard time seeing popular art (which is what I consider television shows - I don't actually watch tv, though I do have one to watch DVD's and VHS movies) as "real" art. I donate money on a regular basis to the Cleveland Orchestra because I feel that their art is something that I wish to support and because their youth outreach programs get so many children interested in music (which demonstrably provides a positive impact on their educational development). I see something like a television show strictly in the realm of the marketplace - it's a consumer good and exists only to make someone money. Hence my stand that investing time and money to save something like a television show would be akin to convincing a snack food company to continue to produce their twinky-doodles. I never would have thought that someone considers twinky-doodles an art.
      Like I said, good point.

  66. Bunch of phreaking idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This pisses me off. How much time spent creating this, organizing it, paying for it? And how many people out there starving, freezing in the cold, desperate for help.

    These people are obviously highly motivated - it's a shame they're motivation is so self-serving and oriented on an absolutely trivial purpose.

  67. QuickTime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's quicktime. I'm not going to pay a fortune for a Mac, just to view this.

  68. Farscape going the way of Red Dwarf by Fweeky · · Score: 1

    What I originally liked about it no longer seems to be there -- it's turned into a pointless puppet show, dragging along huge amounts of baggage from previous episodes and stringing it together with bad jokes and storylines which completely fail to advance the overall plot or fill out the increasingly two dimensional characters.

    In it's current state, I won't miss it. I just hope they'll be able to properly close the story arc and not just leave everything dangling for a new series that'll never come.

  69. Has this not been address? by McFly69 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Here William Shatner's reponse to "Do It Yourself Media."MBR>
    William Shatner: "Get a life ... will ya, people? I mean, for cryin' out loud, it's just a TV show."

    Aired on Saturday Nigth live, late 1990's.

    --



    NO! NO! Please don't mod me, I'm too young to die a troll. *click* Oh the pain, the pain...
    1. Re:Has this not been address? by Rand+Race · · Score: 2



      1987

      --
      Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
    2. Re:Has this not been address? by milovoo · · Score: 1


      It's very easy to criticize, isn't it?

      If one were to hold your hobbies and interests up for scrutiny,
      would we all be impressed?

      Is everything you do fascinating, deep, and socially conscious?

      Farscape is a fun show, it's decent as fiction and enjoyable to watch.
      I like it and hope they find a way to make another season, I also have a life.

      -milo

    3. Re:Has this not been address? by McFly69 · · Score: 2

      To answer your 2 questions.. Yes, get a life =)

      --



      NO! NO! Please don't mod me, I'm too young to die a troll. *click* Oh the pain, the pain...
    4. Re:Has this not been address? by milovoo · · Score: 1

      > To answer your 2 questions.. Yes, get a life =)

      I'll need an example, tell everyone what you do
      that is unanimously impressive, fascinating, deep and
      socially conscious. Really, I want to know. I would
      be surprised if you could manage even two of those.

      I'm willing to bet that you are simply full of crap
      and the high point of your day is insulting other
      people and what they choose to do.

      -milo

      BTW, There were three questions, genius.

    5. Re:Has this not been address? by McFly69 · · Score: 2

      You missed the point. I was just joking on your comment. The Shatner one was just a joke. But seriously if you wish to answer me the orginal question.

      It's very easy to criticize, isn't it? Yes it is because one it is online and second it is freedom of speech protected by the consitution (./ and myself are in the USA). Third, I find it realyl funny for a bunch of people makign a commerical to get a TV show back. Corparate America; once it made a decision it will stay unless reversing that decision will make additional profits for them. If there are a few Americans that like it, so what? They can voice themselves all they want. If they really wanted to make a producting measure is the write several letter to the executives and the producers on how they will make more money for them? For example, promise to watch more of their commericals and but there crap.

      If one were to hold your hobbies and interests up for scrutiny, would we all be impressed? Interesting question but I can not answer it. Perhaps a theorist or a theologian would be more suited for that.

      Is everything you do fascinating, deep, and socially conscious? Of course not, anyone saying otherwise would be lieing through their teeth.


      My son, I hope this helps you out on yoru road to wisdom =)

      --



      NO! NO! Please don't mod me, I'm too young to die a troll. *click* Oh the pain, the pain...
    6. Re:Has this not been address? by milovoo · · Score: 1

      Circular logic, evasion and some sort of god-awful
      stuff happening in the second paragraph that I'm not
      even going to bother to decypher, I now understand
      your sig a little better, you are a troll.

      I should not have wasted my time.

      -milo

    7. Re:Has this not been address? by Ulwarth · · Score: 2

      I actually ran into Ben Browder (plays the main char on the show) on Halloween night in Hollywood. He was talking to a couple of people who were dressed up as characters from the show and carrying "Save Farscape" signs. What's amazing is that he was standing there expressing his incredible gratitude to these geeks for showing such devoting to the show. Now _that's_ a counterpoint to William Shatner, or in fact most Trek actors. Actual gratitude toward the audience, instead of contempt!

      Amazing.

    8. Re:Has this not been address? by McFly69 · · Score: 2

      Umm yea... I am a troll with a +5 funny with Excellent Karma. How you? Not even a +1 moderation.. and I am willing to bet you are just good. Keep at it... one of these days you might become a good troll like me =)

      --



      NO! NO! Please don't mod me, I'm too young to die a troll. *click* Oh the pain, the pain...
  70. Re:Didn't I just see a commercial for a new season by angst · · Score: 1

    Yes there is one season left. They found out after finishing up filming this coming season that they were dropping the show.

  71. Whatever happened to Lexx? by emil · · Score: 2

    I really didn't care for some of the later stuff on earth, but I really liked the earlier shows.

  72. missing the point by gumpshrimp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Many of you seem to be missing the point as to why the uproar about it being cancelled. I as well as most of you realize that all good things come to an end. But, the problem here is that Farscape was signed up for 5 seasons and got cancelled at the end of season 4 with no warning. So there will be no closure at the end of season 4. We will all be left wandering, just like at the end of every season finally. This is was pisses me off, not the it was cancelled, but there will be no closure to the long developed story line.

  73. Re:Wow (ST-TOS) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    IIRC, the demise of TOS was partially due to the fact that the ratings at the time were only taken from a few key cities: not as broadly as it is today. Many of the cities where people loved the show didn't have Nielsen families at all.

    It's rare that a write-in campaign (essentially, that's what this is) to have impact, since ratings=dollars, and that's what this comes down to. There are a few cases where the network allowing a show to "simmer" have helped. "Cheers," for one, had horrible ratings the first few years and eventually picked up popularity, with little change in cast or writing.

  74. "I'm a pirate, but I'm not a Terrorist" by disc-chord · · Score: 2

    Showing support for one's favorite show (not mine, Farscape hurts my eyes) serves mearly to make a stand.

    Showing support or opposition to political issues requires advocacy. A bunch of geeks saying "I am not a terrorist." doesn't help. Noone becomes aware of the issues involved.

    Look at Political Ads, they never tell you wtf the issues are, aside from showing support for the top 5 focus-tested party lines. In order to raise awareness and enlighten the nearly comatose masses you would need alot more than 30 seconds.

    Now let's say you ran a 3 min nationwide spot on Survivor (the total cost of which would probably require every /.ers salary for 4 months) and you make a solid presentation of the facts. The facts don't mean jack shit to most americans because they identify with being "Democrat" or "Republican" and will simply dismiss anything that doesn't appeal to them as "pinko hippy nonsense".

    I wish there was a way to stop this, but there isn't. Every day we sink deeper. I just hope I can get a job over seas before they build the wall.

  75. Geez... bunch of losers.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will they quit being so dumb? Farscape sucks and it rates just as bad as Earth: Boring Conflict.

  76. Parker Lewis Can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, it has. The show "Parker Lewis Can't Lose" (a good show loosely based on "Ferris Bueller's Day Off") was cancelled until a fan uprising caused the show to return for one more season.

    Then there's always the example of the show "Dallas" which was cancelled. They killed off most of the cast and ended most of the storylines. When the show had record rating the last few episodes, it was renewed. How'd they solve the issues? Why, it was all just a dream....

  77. "Lie, Damn Lies, and Statistics" by angst · · Score: 1

    It really throws me for a loop how so very few people determine what TV statins think people are watching.

    Nationwide for 2001-2002 they estimate 100+ million homes with televisions.

    For nationwide stats they electronically monitor 5000 homes.
    For local stats (55 markets) they monitor 20,000+ homes in each market. (approx 1.1 million people)
    During sweeps, they ask approx. 1 million people to fill out "diaries" for a week.

    IMHO, this does not seem like a remotely accurate system.

    1. Re:"Lie, Damn Lies, and Statistics" by Gaijin42 · · Score: 2

      If the sample is random, very small numbers give accurate results.

    2. Re:"Lie, Damn Lies, and Statistics" by angst · · Score: 1

      Please forgive my ignorance, but I do not see how this is possible. I can see if giving a possible viewpoint of generality. Yet I cannot see how accurate it can really be.

  78. Miss Cleo by spazoid12 · · Score: 1

    Screw Farscape, what we *need* is a grassroots movement to bring back Miss Cleo commercials. We'll start by taking up a collection to pay off her legal troubles...Clinton-style!

  79. Free Speech TV (was Re:It's very ironic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd love to hear about (I'll never see it unless someone puts it online, since I don't own a TV, nor do I want one) MORE protest work on TV. It's about time that the "little guys/gals" claimed their piece of the television pie.

    They already have.

    From their website:

    "Free Speech TV uses television to cultivate an informed and active citizenry in order to advance progressive social change. FSTV airs primarily social, political, cultural, and environmental documentaries acquired from independent producers, and we are beginning to produce and commission original content."

    http://members.freespeech.org/fstv/

    I call it the Protest Channel, because every show calls for political/social/economic revolution. If you have DISH satelitte, you can get them, and it looks like they're starting to get on some cable systems around the country.

    I don't support their politics, but I'm very glad to know they're on the air.

  80. Needs a new distribution model by Gnaythan1 · · Score: 1

    Since the SF channel doesn't own it... why not petition the owners to keep making the show, post them online and charge an access fee? If it works for porn why can't it work for this? The tools are in place, the fan base is rabidly techno-literate, and the show is caught between a rock and a hard place. What would it hurt to give online distribution a shot? While you're at it, do Futurama and the animated version of "The Tick" too.

    1. Re:Needs a new distribution model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I'd love to have Futurama, The Tick and Farscape online, the bottom line is... well, the bottom line. Porn is the number one internet industry. The shows you reference don't have that kind of audience, however emphatic they may be. Farscape costs $1.5 mill per ep to produce. You think the producers will get enough hits to make that back? and a profit too?

      The problem the producers have with selling Farscape to another network / cable channel is that Sci Fi Channel owns the rights to the first 88 eps (the first four seasons which is suspicious, since they chose to cancel the show at the end of season four) and have thus far refused to sell those rights. Any potential buyer would either have money to burn or not a lick of sense to buy this show in its fifth season and expect an audience to grow from its core fan base without the ability to show repeats of its first four seasons.

      I hope Sci Fi Channel does the right thing and brings some proper closure to this terrific show. If it closes on a cliff hanger, as it is now expected to, it will be one of the greater travesties of television history. Sci Fi Channel has shot itself in the foot with this one. Lets hope it recovers.

  81. Adbusters [Re:It's very ironic] by Seanasy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Adbusters is what you want. They have professionally produced -- i.e. really good directors/writers, even some from the ad industry -- uncommercials. They'll send you a broadcast quality tape if you buy the air time.

    1. Re:Adbusters [Re:It's very ironic] by sulli · · Score: 2

      Yes, except that they are mind-numbingly annoying. "TV Turn-Off Day" and "Buy Nothing Day"? Puh-leeze.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
  82. Mirror by RudeDude · · Score: 2
    I think the commercial is a done a bit poorly, especially the audio (maybe it's better on a TV instead of as a QT?). But I had Mr HOSTBOT grab it for mirroring anyway.

    FinalCommercial.mov (934 KB).

    --
    RudeDude
    Perl/Linux/PHP hacker
  83. a more likely scenario by milovoo · · Score: 1

    >There's a poster in this topic who says he has 13G
    >of FarScape on his HD, that's how much he loves it.
    >Umm, no, if he loved it he would have bought the
    >DVDs. People like him in fact killed the show.

    Well, if you are obeying the letter of the law with
    regards to region codes on DVDs then it's only possible
    to purchase seasons 1 and 2 on DVD in the US. It seems
    entirely reasonable to me to store seasons 3 and 4 on your
    hard drive for personal use. Although your little
    gripe is also kinda moot since it's not currently
    airing on SciFi anyway. I second the opinion that
    you must be some sort of entertainment industry hardliner.

    -milo
    (I just buy the uk DVDs, region codes are for suckers)

    1. Re:a more likely scenario by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      I second the opinion that you must be some sort of entertainment industry hardliner.

      Not really. I just understand that even if a thing can be reproduced for near-zero cost, it doesn't necessarily follow that it can be originally created for near-zero cost. FarScape, like any other product, cost money to produce, and it's being axed because the investors could not recoup their money from selling the product. Any true fan of the show, who really wants it to continue, would be willing to support it by contributing to the cost of production by buying it as a product.

      People who "pirate" it are literally hurting themselves; the studio will just go on to make another programme and make their money that way, so long as they are making and getting paid for something, that's all they really care about. Perhaps they'll steer clear of genres that attract a tech-savvy fanbase, even. There are far more scripts in existance than there are shows that get made.

      Remember that a studio accountant couldn't care less about the "story arc" or the "character development". A show is like a black box to them, with input and output. If more money comes out than goes in, make another series, if not, cancel it.

    2. Re:a more likely scenario by milovoo · · Score: 1

      >Not really. I just understand that even if a thing
      >can be reproduced for near-zero cost, it doesn't
      >necessarily follow that it can be originally >created for near-zero cost.

      Are you saying that this concept somehow eludes anyone over, say, the age of 5?

      As for the rest of it, I guess I had just not made
      the logical jump to "pirate" from "storing episodes
      on your hard drive". I store photos that I have taken,
      music that I have purchased, and video I have
      recorded on my hard drive. It's just easier.
      Doesn't make me a pirate, of course the eye patch,
      peg leg and parrot does tend to confuse people, Aargh!

      -milo

    3. Re:a more likely scenario by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      Are you saying that this concept somehow eludes anyone over, say, the age of 5?

      It certainly eluded every CEO of every dotcom, and all their investors. It continues to elude everyone who thinks that a viable business can be built by giving the product away for free.

      As for the rest of it, I guess I had just not made the logical jump to "pirate" from "storing episodes on your hard drive". I store photos that I have taken, music that I have purchased, and video I have recorded on my hard drive.

      The important thing is not the media that it is stored on. If you own bought copies, then you've done your part to support the show. Pat yourself on the back. However, anyone who has a copy on their HD that they didn't pay for has no business complaining if the show is cancelled.

    4. Re:a more likely scenario by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      So your saying if you copy it to VHS and from there to your hard-drive thats piracy? People don't buy the DVDs for the episodes, they could just record those on video cassette, they buy the DVDs for the extras. I don't think having the episodes on the web has hurt DVD sales at all, in fact I think its probably helped sales since it has exposed more people to Farscape.

      Adi

  84. Why fret? by kakos · · Score: 1
    Who cares if you can't watch Farscape on some night? Is it that big of a deal that these people have to exert this sort of extreme amount of effort?

    I just don't get it. There are fights that are a lot more meaningful and worthy of this kind of attention than Farscape being cancelled. Instead of making a commercial, why not help the community? I suppose that is asking too much, eh?

    1. Re:Why fret? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And why should one cause exclude another. After all, we spend time watching shows that we enjoy when we could be doing community service. So why not fight to preserve a show we want to watch in addition to doing something else positive for the world?

    2. Re:Why fret? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose it's just as useful as your sitting in your chair at your computer wasting time at this website. tsk tsk tsk.

      what's that pot? black kettle calling?

  85. Re:Didn't I just see a commercial for a new season by Doppleganger · · Score: 2

    Actually, it's half of a season left. The last 11 episodes of the fourth season start airing on Sci Fi in January. And, thanks to Sci Fi not informing them about the cancellation until the last day of filming, they end on a "To be continued.."

  86. Ads don't work as well on Geeks by multimed · · Score: 1

    Yeah the targeting aspect should be a selling point. BUT the more intelligent and/or cynical people are, the less susceptible they are to television commercials. Geeks tend to be higher on the intelligence and/or cynical side so even well targeted advertising will probably still have a low success rate. With few exceptions, the industry (television advertising) is based on mild brainwashing. Ads that offer something I'm interested in, minus the lies and fluff, just presenting the facts are about the only ones that get me to actually consider buying. So for the targetting to work, the commercials would need to be completely different too--for an industry that is very creative in so many ways, they're just not willing to abandon the assumptions they've been working on for years.

    --
    Vote Quimby.
    1. Re:Ads don't work as well on Geeks by Torqued · · Score: 1

      Yeah.. especially those of us with Tivo. :)

  87. What Happend? by Str8Dog · · Score: 1

    Last year, SciFi signed a contract to pick up two more seasons of FarScape. This contract had an option to drop the 5th season. The show was wildly popular at the time and was SciFi's premier show.

    Then SciFi picked up Startgate SG-1, FarScape started jumping around in its time slot. No one had a clue as to when it would be on. It started losing viewer.

    SciFi announced to the FarScape crew they were not going to pick up the final season around the time they filmed the season finale for Season 4. Thus leaving the story on a cliffhanger.

    Now for total speculation. It has been said that FarScape cannot be picked up by another channel due to SciFi's option on the 5th season. Basically SciFi has the rights to a season they are not willing to pay to produce. To further hinder a move, SciFi owns the broadcast rights to the first 4 seasons. What channel would want to pick up a show in its 5th season, if they cant run reruns of the first 4 as well.

    In all it sucks. But you can help get the word out.

    --


    Str8Dog
    using System.Darkside; public
  88. Chat Log from 9/20 Explains What Happened by Str8Dog · · Score: 1

    You can ready it here. Chat contains David Kemper, Ben Browder and the guy that played D'Argo (cant think of his name) talking to the fans in #farscape irc.scifi.com.

    --


    Str8Dog
    using System.Darkside; public
  89. A somewhat more interesting "advert" by yaragn · · Score: 1
  90. Nice effort but ... by ClosedSource · · Score: 2

    they should learn to light their subjects better. Some of them look like they must be in the witness protection program. My videos have the same problem.

  91. Gaijin's Introduction to Statistics. by Gaijin42 · · Score: 2

    Well, here is an example. I wrote a security camera program for a company once. They had a camera hooked up to a computer, and wanted it to save a GIF every time the picture changed (They had it pointed at a safe, they wanted to record every time someone accessed the safe)

    We were taking pictures at 640x480 which is 288000 pixels. If I sampled as few as 50 pixels, and compared them to what the pixel was in the last frame, I got the same results as if I sampled 10,000 pixels, and the same as if I sampled every pixel.

    It was very important that I pick my sample randomly, because obviously if I picked the first 50 pixels every time, and the motion was in the bottom of the frame, I would never see it.

    Simmilarly, if 1/10 people in the US watches friends on Thursday nights, it doesn't matter if I pick 100 people, 1000 people, 10,000 people, or 100,000,000 people. 1/10 is 1/10.

    Because the population is so large, and can be highly "pocketed" (people who live near eachother tend to watch the same stuff, because their friends tell them about it, or the local paper writes about it, or because someone local stars in it, or whatever) they need a VERY random, and very large (by statiscal measuring) sample.

    Also, there is a wide variety of programming available, so if you only ask 100 people, you might get 1 person for each show so you ask 100000 people and then you notice that "Bob's Accordion World" only gets 1 viewer, and friends gets 10000.

    In any case it works.

    Here is a test you can do at home.

    Take 2 dice. Roll them a few hundred times , and keep track of what you got each roll.

    At the end, count how many ones you got, how many twos, how many threes etc.

    You should end up with a nice bell curve, peaking around 6.

    Now pick a random 50 rolls, and do the counts again. The bell curve should look almost identical, even though you only sampled a small percentage.

    In this case, 50 is a large % of a few hundred rolls. But the graph would look the same if you rolled the dice 10,000,000 times. I just didn't think you would want to roll that many times :)

    1. Re:Gaijin's Introduction to Statistics. by angst · · Score: 1

      Ok I see your point. It does not put me at ease though. IF they are so accurate about humans, then I definately feel even less at ease about our race. Ugh. Thank you none the less.

    2. Re:Gaijin's Introduction to Statistics. by Gaijin42 · · Score: 2

      The thing to remember about statistics :
      They are very good at caclulating how an entire population will act.

      The are very poor at determining how an individual will act.

      Even things like "What books you will like, based on what other books you like" kinda stuff you see at amazon is pretty weak.

      If 1/10 of of the people who like book A like book B, then that tells you not much about me, even if you know I like book A.

      But if 1/10 of people who like book C like B, and D like B and E like B (etc) AND I like C,D, and E, then you have a 4/10 chance that I will like B. And that starts to be usefull.

  92. sleeper hits by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

    "Cheers," for one, had horrible ratings

    Yeah, and look at Moesha.

    No, better not.

  93. Hmmm, maybe they shoulda used Ellen Feiss by MeatMan · · Score: 1

    ...for one of the spots. Because "cute, bouncy, dingy, stoner chicks" seem to be real popular these days. Heck, free international publicity for Farscape on Letterman or Leno would have saved the Farscapers a lot of money and hassle.
    They could even offer Ellen a guest appearance on Farscape. She could play a dingy, one red-eyed, bouncy, purple people eater.

    If ignorance is Bliss, why aren't there more happy people?

  94. No Bell Curve by Kommet · · Score: 1

    No matter how many times you roll those two dice, if they are truely random dice (perfectly equal probability of each side landing up) you will NEVER get a Bell curve out of them. Furthermore, the probability graph peaks at the value of 7 for two 6-sided dice (labeled 1-6, as such dice typically are), not at 6!

    There are 36 ways for two 6-sided dice to turn up (6*6). There is one way each to roll a 2 or a 12, which is either double 1's or 6's. There are two ways to get either 3 (roll a 1 and a 2, roll a 2 and a 1) or 11 (roll a 5 and a 6, roll a 6 and a 5). There are three ways to get either a 4 or a 10, four ways to get 5 or 9 as the result, five ways to get 6 or 8, and six ways to roll a perfect 7. If you do the math, the probabilities from 2 to 12 (in order) are: 1/36, 2/36, 3/36, 4/36, 5/36, 6/36, 5/36, 4/36, 3/36, 2/36, 1/36. This is a straight line up, peaking at the probability for rolling 7, followed by a straight line down, which is obviously not a curve.

    I submit to you that Gaijin's Introduction to Statistics may need some reworking. :-)

    1. Re:No Bell Curve by Gaijin42 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Its not a bell curve, you are right. However, the ppoint was not the particular shape a histogram would make from rolling die. The point was that the histogram would look the same if you measured every roll, or a random sample.

    2. Re:No Bell Curve by eve11 · · Score: 1
      To reiterate Gaijin's assertions:

      The overall population size does not factor into the calculations of standard errors for proportion estimates. As long as the population is significantly larger (say 50x) than the sample, and as long as the sample is large enough (1000 is good), the bell curve approximation of the distribution of the proportion is relatively accurate. 100,000 or 100,000,000, doesn't matter, statisticians get the same confidence from a sample of 5000.

      If you want to attack problems in the Neilsen's, it's difficult because it's hard to get ahold of their precise methodology. But I would start with the influx of cable choices... Neilsens were designed when there were only 3 or 4 networks around. They are not the best tools for estimating cable viewership, but they are the only measurement out there.

  95. Farscape on United Airlines by jasenj1 · · Score: 1

    Something I find odd about the FS business is that I was on a trans-Pacific flight on United a couple weeks ago and they showed the Farscape episode that is an homage to Chuck Jones/Road Runner. I kept thinking to myself, "Why would the network bother to let (or pay for, I have no idea how airtime on jetliners is financed) United show a show that has been cancelled?" Wouldn't one think that any episode of a show shown on an airplane would essentially be a big ad for the series?

    1. Re:Farscape on United Airlines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's cheaper to air shows that are no longer in production than it is ones that are still running. On Continental last September I had the pleasure of watching Sports Night.

  96. so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am borg

  97. Re:channel 9 sucks for this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait, you don't have reality programs in Australia? Jesus Christ, no wonder you're so far behind. Get on the stick! Let's see Bruce & Sheila Get Pissed: An Aussie Dating Odyssey! Or something! World domination awaits!

  98. Viewer Activism.. I love it!! by brienne · · Score: 1

    I want to express my profound thanks to this fanbase. Their efforts will surely contribute towards changing newtorks and advertisers, short-sightedness towards the love and compassion of which viewership is capable. Too many quality shows have been laid to rest because networks are blinded by neilsen numbers, statistics which do not tell the whole truth. It's time to shake the foundation, and this group seems to have the strength in numbers and $$ to do it. I say more power to them. Speak loud Farscape fans!!

  99. TJ Hooker speaks! (Re:Has this not been address?) by Zathras11 · · Score: 0

    It sounds to me like Mr. Shatner is just upset that there was no campaign to bring back T.J. Hooker. It is people like us that watch the stuff people like him do that earns people like him the money he makes, so that he can afford to go around tellings people like us to get a life. I would suggest to him that he keep quiet and just enjoy the ride!

  100. It is all about re-negotiation.... by GI+Jones · · Score: 1

    A lot of slashdotters have pointed out reasons why SciFi would kill the show. A few posts mentioned how Henson has the rights to the show and makes all the $$$ on merchandising and syndication. If you were SciFi... would you put up with that? No, just like many artists and shows, once something makes it, it is time to renegotiate for the sake of equality.

    Did any of you ever think that this is a ploy to renegotiate? Did you ever think that you are giving Henson a firmer grip if you get other networks in the bid for the show? Has anyone wondered why cancellation news has not been deliberatly declared by SciFi? Sure, mail in fan letters and protests to SciFi... heck, write Henson Productions and gripe to them. If the show is worth its salt (and I think that it is). Let the networks and the owners work this out. But don't sabotage a possible SciFi re-negotiation by involving other networks.

    Competition for the show only strengthens Henson's grip. Simply show continued support for SciFi's show. Don't forget, not everyone has SciFi Channel. When smaller cable network stations have to fight for audience to support big budget shows... the viewer is almost always the loser. Just look at how Monk and Deadzone are scrambling for viewers. A great first-run show is not always affordable for smaller cable-only networks... especially a scifi show with a niche audience. Maybe I am wrong, but if I am right... Besides the viewer, who has the most to lose if SciFi cancels the show?... Henson, that's who... follow the money.

    --
    "Perhaps most amazingly, votaries of 'diversity' insist on absolute conformity." -- Tony Snow
  101. Farscape Sux0rs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem with farscape is that it lacked appeal. Like the now dead ST Voyager it was primarly a one story show per episode. Plus no techno babble and lots of lame muppet type aliens.

    SO long u lame ass piece of sci-fi. Next on the cutting block Andromeda and Firefly.

  102. It is NOT all about re-negotiation.... by GI+Jones · · Score: 1
    After reading this I retract my original thoughts... the show is truly dead :(

    --
    "Perhaps most amazingly, votaries of 'diversity' insist on absolute conformity." -- Tony Snow
  103. An Introduction to Probability by forgotmypassword · · Score: 1

    "But if 1/10 of people who like book C like B, and D like B and E like B (etc) AND I like C,D, and E, then you have a 4/10 chance that I will like B. And that starts to be usefull."

    Which is mostly false.

    Imagine a scenario with more than 11 books C1, C2, ... C11 such that 10% of the people who like book Ci also like book B. If one person liked all C books and you were to sum the probabilities as you did, then you would end up with that person being 110% likely to enjoy book B. And this is impossible as 0<=P<=1

    The only time that you can add probabilities like that is when there is zero intersection between the groups - independence.

    1. Re:An Introduction to Probability by eve11 · · Score: 1
      The only time that you can add probabilities like that is when there is zero intersection between the groups - independence.

      Sorry to nitpick, but it's not independence, it's mutual exclusivity. Two events cannot be independent and disjoint at the same time unless the probability of one of the events is 0. This is a common misconception, but the point is, if events are disjoint, then knowing that one has happened means you automatically know the other has NOT happened.

      Independence P(A and B) = P(A)P(B)

      Disjoint (A and B) empty => P(A and B) = 0.

    2. Re:An Introduction to Probability by forgotmypassword · · Score: 1

      Your right, though it was not my misconception, but an error.

      They get confused because they both annihilate the cross terms in probability calculations, one with respect to sums and one with respect to products.

      P(A||B) = P(A) + P(B) : for A,B disjiont
      In general: P(A||B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A&B)
      P(A U B) = P(A) * P(B) : for A,B independent
      In general: P(A&B) = P(A)*P(B|A) = P(B)*P(A|B)

      I suppose if the language was more technical, there would be one adjective that would apply to both as commutivity and associativity applies to both multiplication and addition. At least it is not as bad as Topology terminology though.

  104. Media content control by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

    >Does anyone know of any other efforts to produce true 'grassroots' commercials like this?

    Commercials like you mention get made all the time, but what is most often the case is that the networks don't want to run the ads regardless of how much money you offer them. Usually issues like pro-legalization are dismissed instantly because a network doesn't want to be associated with the message. A television network has no requirement to play what you offer them, even if it is over our airwaves. If they want to pander to the usual right and not upset middle-america with alternative viewpoints then they will and there's little you can do about it other than get published in more independant outlets.

    >Personally, I would love to see a grassroots commercial that advocates re-opening the Federal case against MS.

    Okay so they run it, then MS never advertised with them again. They'll tell you to keep your $5,000 because MS's advertising is worth much more. Or better yet they'll call MS and see what kind of deal they can cut now that they have someone willing to pay to air a commercial like that. Corporate media is only good x amount of things and freedom of speech and diverse viewpoints ain't one of them.

  105. LINUXGAMES.COM PROTEST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out http://www.linuxgames.com people! They re-modeled their site! And what is sad, it looks like the http://www.watchfarscape.com website! Someone get in contact with AlKini and Judecca to stop the pain!

  106. Eat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My pussy, Bitter Old Man

  107. Buffy was never dropped, quite the opposite by Gorimek · · Score: 2

    When Buffy's 5 year contract with WB expired, UPN and WB had a bidding war where UPN eventually emerged as winner by paying $2.3M per episode, up from the $1M that WB had been paying.

    If you want to call it "winning" that UPN pays much more for the show than they hope to earn from it. Apparently they see it as an investment in the image of the network to have such a prestigious show, that it is worth the money.

    I know this surprises a lot of people, but it is a prestigious show in the sense that it is a big favorite with the critics and has a not too big but passionately fanatic fan base.

  108. The Best Show Ever (Sci-Fi Ch Bite My Ass) by frellnick · · Score: 1
    Man, this sucks on the highest level on non-lethal, non-disfiguring suckage. I don't even own a television, but I would drive two hundred miles to my folks house roundtrip to watch Farscape. I was going to spring for cable and a big TV *just* to watch Farscape.

    For all you retards who think any thought or expression isn't pining over "important" issues and weighty matters, go soak up face time on the mother ship with Sally Struthers. Marxist jaggoffs.

    This is about the death of the imagination. Imagination, that thing which the television otherwise sucks straight out of you while you watch it, slowing letting you grow into a soulless mass of apathy and feckless consumer of inexpensive combinations of grease and salt, fat and sugar. Farscape reaks of imagination, like a vivid, freaked out, bizarre dream that reminds you that the mind is bigger than your day job or the daily news.

    Also, I really liked it.

    And Erin. Erin Sune destroys Buffy.

  109. This is EXACTLY it. by gtwreck · · Score: 1

    The show was put out to pasture to give it an excuse to be cancelled. They moved it's start time back 1 hour to 10pm, and plugged the HELL out of Stargate which they ran right before it. Farscape received little to no promotion, not even during Stargate (which you think is why they would have put Stargate first).

    So Farscape survived it's start time adjustment with only a negligable decrease in ratings from it's previous prime-time spot.

    The brass at Sci-Fi used this as a primary excuse to cut the show. But the REAL reason was that they could make a weaker show for much less money that appealed to a mass market that would get only slightly weaker ratings.

    So in my opinion it was a calculated move to kill off the expensive (but still profitable) show.

    It's well known that the new head-honcho of sci-fi doesn't like space shows and prefers paranormal ones. But the reason why is paranormal shows are CHEAP.

  110. Aussie Fan - we make it, don't get to see it... by Cynicat · · Score: 1

    [snip] Nine thought enough of Farscape to help bankroll it with the Jim Henson Company in 1999. Knowing Australia's bleak history with science fiction, Nine waited until May 2000 to broadcast the first half-dozen episodes. The show didn't do well, so Nine decided to put the show up against the 2000 Olympics. No wonder Farscape hasn't done well in Australian ratings. [snip] Last December/January, when Nine finally broadcast the show's second season, my Farscape site got more hits from Australia than from any other country. My point is that Aussie Scapers may be few in number, but they do have excellent taste in television programming. And in most states, the season aired at 2pm every weekday (in some states it was 1am). We don't get SciFi network here - they were running repeats on FoxKids for a while. I think channel 9 got disillusioned - they saw Henson and thought they were getting a kids show (rude shock for them LOL). I'm an Aussie fan and watched religiously - I'm proud that something so good was being created right here in my country (and it wasn't about cops, or a hospital, or the trials and tribulations of a bunch of high schoolers....). They had some of the best in the industry working on Farscape - Henson for one, and Animal Logic. Animal Logic - name sound familiar? Think "The Matrix". AL was the effects house responsible for the Agents-and-hallway-in-code sequence, and exploding Agent Smith toward the end of the film. ;) Dudes, they tore up the sets after the announcement to use the space for other things. They disassembled the animatronic pilot. There's nothing left to make a show with! Actually, the sets were struck then stored at Fox Studios. Same with Pilot, he's in a box (poor bugger). After 4 years of use some bits of the set needed replacing anyway LOL Everything is just in storage for now, ready to be broken out and given new life. The cast and crew are optimistic about getting another season. We all knew the show wouldn't last forever, all we want is a conclusion - can't leave poor Crichton out there forever :( Save Farscape - give 500 Australian cast and crew their jobs back.

  111. I think you just highlighted the problem by fishexe · · Score: 2

    Thank you for your time, I'm going to bed.

    It seems funny to me that despite your rant, you haven't organized a group that we can donate money to to put anti-DMCA/anti-SSSCA/anti-what-have-you ads on the air.

    The essential difference between those real issues and Farscape is, one geek actually decided to start such an initiative, and got others involved. I fervently believe that all it will take is one geek dedicated enough to start and run such an effort to get roughly the entire slashdot population to collectively sponsor anti-totalitarian ads.

    --
    "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
  112. Really bad things can become extremely popular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take Ellen Feiss or "All Your Base" for example.

  113. Re:Sad news ... Stephen King dead at 55 by sscrivener · · Score: 1

    Can I ask how this rumor got started in the first place? I'm not talking about the first post here about it... I'm talking about where the first poster heard it and why. Could just be that the person in question saw Elvis and *thought* it was Stephen King... :)

  114. to put a number on it... by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

    ..the figure I've heard is $1.7 million USD per episode. Comparable to "Star Trek" I believe.

    Paranormal shows are cheap -- but where are the merchandising possibilities??? Seriously, if they manage to make a good movie, and I think they can, the TV series will skyrocket in value. I don't see much potential in John Edward reruns. Or John Edward, who will be demanding more money for his act and leave SciFi.

    But what do I know. I think you have to be a Conehead to be a network exec.

  115. Re:Oh good Lord, isn't there a more worthwhile cau by MikeAtPilotsChamber · · Score: 1

    Why don't you put together a commercial for a more worthwhile cause then? I'm sure this has been said before, but the Farscape fans didn't have all that much cash, and your PC will edit stuff just as well as theirs.

  116. Re:I am Sci-Fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly - that's the point.

    So why is this Offtopic?

  117. Re:Viper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The pilot (tv movie) was quite good, and showed a lot of promise.

    The actual series is a pale shadow of the pilot.

    But hey its a _Viper_ with 4WD off-road mode (see movie)

  118. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    Real software engineers work from 9 to 5, because that is the way the job is
    described in the formal spec. Working late would feel like using an
    undocumented external procedure.

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...