Slashdot Mirror


Spammer Gets Spam Mailed

ssblood noted a story about a spammer getting what he deserves as well as a related story from the Register. Essentially the virtual spammer is capable of sending a billion emails a day, and is getting sacks of physical junk mail from irritable folks. Apparently part of this plot was hatched on familiar turf too.

341 comments

  1. Dupe alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    ..and first post?

    1. Re:Dupe alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not only a dupe, but a lot of us watched it happen. Slashdot is posting an article about itself? I know you got married Taco (congratulations), but have you been under a rock?

    2. Re:Dupe alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was really hoping this was another follow up on this guy. Now I have to put my pants back on.

    3. Re:Dupe alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There's quite a lot of duplicate news stories here, most often citing the same URL as the previous story. I'm wondering, how much work would it be to adapt the "enter new story" script the editors use to do a search for similar urls or stories in say the past month? Given the article posting rate and the amount of readers /. has, the server won't even notice, and with a search engine already in place I doubt it would be hard to implement. So what's keeping them from adopting a simple technological measure to improve the quality of their site?

      Lourens

    4. Re:Dupe alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe a stack of Internet Mokeys could do a better job.

    5. Re:Dupe alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the Slashdot flowchart, it won't scale.

    6. Re:Dupe alert! by tdemark · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Forget given them a tool they have to use -- make it automatic.

      As part of the subimission process, compare the included URLs to the URLs of previous stories and generate a warning page if there are matches.

      Something along the lines of:

      WARNING: Duplicate URL
      http://www.example.com/foo/bar.html
      Date: Dec 14, 2002
      Article: Article Title

      and

      WARNING: Similar URL
      http://www.example.com/foo/bar.htm
      Date: Dec 2, 2002
      Article: Article Title

      Continue with story submission?
      -Yes- -No-

    7. Re:Dupe alert! by 1u3hr · · Score: 3, Funny
      So what's keeping them from adopting a simple technological measure to improve the quality of their site?

      What's keeping them from spellchecking? What's keeping them from seeing if the links posted are valid, let alone relevant?

      After all, each "editor" must post three or even four paragraphs of text a day. Would it kill them to check it? Obviously, the answer is they don't give a fuck.

    8. Re:Dupe alert! by azav · · Score: 1

      AGREED! If we consider ourselves to be as cool as we think we are, we should at least master basic spelling and grammar. Now IF the "post comment" part of /. could open up our email program, we could spell check our submissions and not look like complete morons who haven't made it past 3rd grade.

      You either inflict your bad spelling and grammar on others and reinforce bad habits or promote adherance to standards and consistancy. Don't be like Microsoft. Spell correctly.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    9. Re:Dupe alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it's written in Perl, don't yah know.

      WORN code cannot be modified, at least not easily.

      WORN = write once, read never

    10. Re:Dupe alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not entirely fair I think. I'm sure that the rate at which pages are submitted is a whole lot higher than the rate at which they are posted. They have to check all the submitted pages, not just the ones that end up on the site.

      Lourens

    11. Re:Dupe alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would they bother to check somthing they are NOT going to post ?? They should only follow up with an article that is being considered for posting.

    12. Re:Dupe alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ITYM "adherence".

    13. Re:Dupe alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -Yes-

    14. Re:Dupe alert! by 1u3hr · · Score: 2
      They have to check all the submitted pages, not just the ones that end up on the site.

      No they don't; they only have to scan through the submissions (missing important submissions is a whole other story). Once they decide on a story to publish, that's the only one that needs to be checked. And since, as I mentioned, each editor only does a handful of such stories a day, this amounts to checking less than one page of text per day.

      I once worked as an editor on a news site; I had to check, revise and upload an average of 80 pieces a day (from a few paragraphs to a few pages in length), some of which were poorly translated from Chinese, and so I'm not impressed with the professionalism of Slashdot which has about 1000 times the audience of the pissy little site I had. The editors here are salaried, this isn't some fan site a teenager puts up.

      I respect the technical aspects of the massive load the system handles, even the moderation system that keeps the moronic posters down, but the simplest, primary thing is the quality of the text, and this is inexcusably bad; as is the fatuous repetition of stories which could be prevented by simple technical solutions, or just glancing at a list of stories recently published.

    15. Re:Dupe alert! by LafinJack · · Score: 1

      It would help if people didn't submit dupes in the first place!

      But that's just my opinion, I could be wrong.

      --
      we are building a religion
      a limited edition
      we are now accepting callers
      for these pendant key chains
    16. Re:Dupe alert! by IndependentVik · · Score: 1

      . . . the moderation system that keeps the moronic posters down . . .

      Are we going to the same site, you and I? ;)

      --
      I'd suggest you don't use Slashdot as your only news source, or you will suffer permanent brain damage.
    17. Re:Dupe alert! by 1u3hr · · Score: 2
      Are we going to the same site, you and I? ;)

      Try viewing "all posts" and see what garbage is posted (the FPs, goatse.cx, etc). I do appreciate a system that lets you choose not to drink the bilge water.

    18. Re:Dupe alert! by byron150 · · Score: 1

      You know you might just try hitting preview and reading your own damn submission once in awhile.....damn kids and their damned spell check. Do something for yourself once in awhile.

      FYI I'm 22 ;)

      --
      -Never believe in the end of something great, send it to sub-committee for further study!!! - ME
    19. Re:Dupe alert! by azav · · Score: 1

      You just supported my point. I did. We all do not know how to spell every word and it should be easier to spell check our submissions.

      Allowing us to use our emailers (that have spell checkers) to make submissions would be a step in the right direction.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  2. haha, stupid spammers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the Internet commmunity needs to fight against spammers just like this.

  3. Dupe story? by vicviper · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/12/06/155422 7&mode=nested&tid=133

    Or should I go back to bed on a Sunday morning...

    1. Re:Dupe story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should definately go back to bed. Your boyfriend is getting cold and wants to snuggle.

    2. Re:Dupe story? by skroz · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, but Taco was out with his new bride when the first one was posted. Do you really expect him to be reading his site ON HIS WEDDING NIGHT? I can see it now... carrying her across the threshhold of the honeymoon suite, gruffly depositing her on the bed, whipping out his Zaurus (no, not THAT "Zaurus..." the one with the, er, stylus. I mean, batteries... no, that's certainly no good. Digital screen, yes. The zaurus with the digital screen...) and searching feverishly around the hotel room for a nearby WAP so he can read his website.

      CowboyNeal, maybe, but Taco?

      --
      -- Minds are like parachutes... they work best when open.
    3. Re:Dupe story? by cyberlotnet · · Score: 1

      My Sig sums up slashdot in one sentance.

    4. Re:Dupe story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish!

    5. Re:Dupe story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah, but Taco was out with his new bride when the first one was posted. Do you really expect him to be reading his site ON HIS WEDDING NIGHT?

      They got married in Vegas for Christ's sake. I would be suprised if there wasn't an Internet cafe inside the "chapel". Getting married in Las Vegas is basically saying you're too broke from losing all your VA Linux stock option valuation to buy her a real wedding in a respectable church with real bride's maids and groomsmen and a limo that is NOT A TAXI CAB! Talk about lame ass geek wedding. My wife would've stuck an icepick in my chest if I had even mentioned getting married in Sin City for crying out loud. What a cheap ass bastard. So yes, I wouldn't doubt for a SECOND that he checked Slashdot on his wedding night.

    6. Re:Dupe story? by TrumpetPower! · · Score: 5, Funny

      The zaurus with the digital screen...

      Whoah...Taco's Zarus has a digital screen? That's like, waaaay too much information.

      Cheers,

      b&

      --
      All but God can prove this sentence true.
    7. Re:Dupe story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, But I do expect him to know how to use the search function on the website he created.

    8. Re:Dupe story? by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      Is this an unspoken confession the /. search engine is too horrible for even editors to use?

      Those who can not remember the past (stories) are condemned to repeat (them) (over and over and over and over). -- Santayana (sort of)

    9. Re:Dupe story? by RollingThunder · · Score: 2

      It should be easy to automate at least -link- duplicate checking, though.

      The engine already pulls all the links into a sidebar for the story. Just have it autosearch the archives for each link when bringing the story up, with a list of dupes (like dependencies in bugzilla), and then the editor can easily spotcheck any suspiciously unique duped links. IE: ignore basic www.nytimes.com, but check a deep story.

    10. Re:Dupe story? by stormpunk · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a classic casemod to me. You might be able to find a kit on thinkgeek to mod yours too!

  4. The only infallible law in the universe is... by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 4, Funny

    karma...

    Ain't it a bitch?

    And I don't mean /. cheapened use of the word.

  5. IN SOVIET RUSSIA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    ....hhiihihihi....


    I dunno! =D

    1. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...the CmdrTaco double posts YOU

    2. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...dead horse beats you!

  6. Hasn't this been covered to death already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Either this is a duplicate, or Taco needs to head back on his honeymoon.

    Or maybe I'm jaded and have seen this a zillion times already, with absolutely no new data. Yah yah, we know he's annoyed. Ya ya we know he's gotten in touch with some muckity muck lawyer.

    Cmon, lets get some meat!

    1. Re:Hasn't this been covered to death already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to straight homosexuals?

    2. Re:Hasn't this been covered to death already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No he means gay homosexuals. Gay homosexuals are straight. Gay gay homosexuals are gay.

  7. "They're Out of Their Minds..." by efatapo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ok....? Getting back a little of what you dish out justifies calling people "Out of their minds". I can see if they were firebombing his house, but sending him junk mail? ;) Come on Alan, what're you thinking. This has to be the best story ever. The funniest thing I've heard today at LEAST!

    1. Re:"They're Out of Their Minds..." by jdera · · Score: 2, Insightful

      firebomb.... ya.... i like that....

    2. Re:"They're Out of Their Minds..." by jonadab · · Score: 2

      > firebomb.... ya.... i like that....

      Firebombing might be just a wee bit over the top. Instead, see if you
      can't get a zoning variance for the lot across the street and put in
      a business. Like, maybe, a paper mill.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  8. Now slashdot is getting spammed... by BlueArchon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...with old news, wonder why I even bother to point this out...

    1. Re:Now slashdot is getting spammed... by iacyclone · · Score: 1

      Old news? Isn't that all that is posted on /., old news from other sites that post is first?

  9. Dupe. by fatbitch · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Re:Dupe. by mshiltonj · · Score: 2

      This story is so good it could be re-posted on slashdot at least once a week and still be good every time.

    2. Re:Dupe. by vsprintf · · Score: 2

      That's true, but couldn't we get updated news - like how many truckloads of mail have been delivered?

  10. Go have some coffee CmdrTaco... by vjlen · · Score: 0, Redundant
  11. Errors in counting? by dr_eaerth · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Almost 300 anti-Ralsky posts were made on the Slashdot.org Web site..."

    Sure that sounds impressive, but how many of those were dupes?

    1. Re:Errors in counting? by ZeLonewolf · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Ahh, first post after his honeymoon... give the guy a break, I'm sure his mind is elsewhere :)

      --
      "If at first you don't succeed, lower your standards."
    2. Re:Errors in counting? by Rik+van+Riel · · Score: 4, Informative

      I know this story is a dupe. The slashdot editors have re-posted the old story, instead of posting the newly submitted follow-up story to this one...

      *sigh*

    3. Re:Errors in counting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is it really a honeymoon when you've lived with your spouse prior to the wedding? Just asking.

    4. Re:Errors in counting? by Ponty · · Score: 1

      Do you care to provide the link, or just bitch?

    5. Re:Errors in counting? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I wonder... Do they count the SOVIET RUSSIA posts as anti-Ralsky?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    6. Re:Errors in counting? by Archfeld · · Score: 2

      speaking from past experience YES it is. Even though it seems small the MARRIED THING is DIFFERENT. Enjoy the Honeymoon cause things have changed DRASTICALLY and you won't realize it for a couple of months. The changes are not all for the worse by any means, but A-CHANGING YOU WILL BE...It is women's nature to seek to 'improve' her mate for her children's sake, and man's nature to just deal with it :)

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    7. Re:Errors in counting? by MavEtJu · · Score: 2

      It were only 200 anti-Ralsky posts, but some were longer than average and counted for two.

      --
      bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
    8. Re:Errors in counting? by SirCrashALot · · Score: 1

      They weren't just longer, but posted using a 1.4 GHz computer, which is faster than average. So in theory (If you didn't have to wait 20 seconds to post), these "posters" could have posted even more anti-Ralsky posts.

  12. Taco - go back to the honeymoon suite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Jeesh this is I don't know how old...

  13. Making fp informative since 12/15/02 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  14. I dont think this is a dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the story references to slashdot as being the place where the ides to harass him were conceptualized.

    1. Re:I dont think this is a dupe by danny256 · · Score: 2

      Ya, there were part 1 and part 2 of this story, in part 1 we all organized the mail bombing, in part 2 he calls his lawyer on us, this is a dupe of part 2.

  15. Damn you! by Bish.dk · · Score: 1, Insightful

    When I first saw the article I went "Yesh! They got another spammer!!" ... That is until I noted the similarities with this story.
    I seriously can't believe that most /.-readers, who just happen to surf by in their spare time, can spot a duplicate story quicker than an editor, who is doing it full time. :)

    1. Re:Damn you! by handsomepete · · Score: 4, Funny
      I seriously can't believe that most /.-readers, who just happen to surf by in their spare time, can spot a duplicate story quicker than an editor, who is doing it full time. :)
      I think you got those two reversed... most /.-readers do this full time and the editors surf by in their spare time.
  16. What's so bad about Slashdot? by The+AtomicPunk · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... that the editors themselves obviously don't read it ??

  17. Dupe: A great reminder by joshua42 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, keep postning this story every and then as a reminder so the junk mail pressure on this guy does not ease off...

    --

    - El riesgo siempre vive - Private J. Vasquez
    1. Re:Dupe: A great reminder by meringuoid · · Score: 2
      Yeah, keep postning this story every and then as a reminder so the junk mail pressure on this guy does not ease off...

      I don't think it's anything so malicious as that. It's just gloating. 'La la la, we made Ralsky's life hell, la la la!'

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:Dupe: A great reminder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually a lot like the sites where people exchange info on abortion providers.

      Then when the doctors get harrassed (or occasionally murdered) the people who run the website are all like, huh? We didn't do it!

    3. Re: Dupe: A great reminder by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > Yeah, keep postning this story...

      Maybe he's submitting duplicate stories to Slashdot for his spamish revenge?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    4. Re:Dupe: A great reminder by Danse · · Score: 2

      Yeah, except nobody is encouraging murder here. Just junk mail. The anti-abortion sites were actually encouraging people to kill doctors.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    5. Re:Dupe: A great reminder by funkdancer · · Score: 1

      There's no pleasure greater than schädenfreude.

      --
      ISO certified == THX certified
    6. Re:Dupe: A great reminder by Lothsahn · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, I'm sure Slashdot knows how to post a story over and over and over and...

      --
      -=Lothsahn=-
    7. Re:Dupe: A great reminder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is, there's a mysterious area here.

      Openly wishing ill of someone is generally protected by the first amendment. Taking out a 'contract' on someone generally is not.

      If some crazed Slashdot reader takes it upon himself to remove the spammer from this world, is Slashdot partly to blame for a murder?

      If they run a positive story about the murder after it happens, does that make them somewhat guilty?

    8. Re:Dupe: A great reminder by Danse · · Score: 2

      First of all, /. has done absolutely nothing to incite or encourage murder. They would be blameless as far as I'm concerned if some nutjob took it upon himself to kill the guy. If they ran a positive story about it afterwards, I would consider that to be in extremely poor taste, but I don't believe it would make them even somewhat guilty of the murder.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    9. Re:Dupe: A great reminder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think everyone has it all wrong. Granted it feels damn good to give spammers a piece of their own medicine, however that doesnt solve the problem. Are you trying to "fight" the war? or are you trying to "WIN" the war. Getting rid of spammers 1 at a time isnt going to do any good, its like you trying to empty a lake with a bucket. yes eventualy the lake will be drained...maybe, I have one word for you...RAIN. you have to think of what KEEPS these people in business, $$$$$$$. Take the money away and the problem will go away, maybe. Where do spammers get their money from? From you and me and anyone else who gives the advertiseing industry the incentive to to try and sell us something. If your on the internet then you are a potential customer, I dont care what kind of customer there is always something you or anyone else will "Buy" or subscribe to, I know i'm guilty of this myself. How many of you have ever subscribed or bought anything off the internet? anything at all? Ever have that service or shareware program that you liked so much you didnt care if you had to register it or subscribe to it even if it was only $5? You have only 1 option to get rid of spam, become nonexistant, do not log onto the internet. Sure you can log on but dont let anyone know your online. They cant spam you if you dont exist. Think your safe by posting on "secure web pages"? Wrong they have ungodly number of ways they can find you on the internet. Who is the real evil? the spammer or those who support spam? Who supports spam? You and everyone else who make them selves a potential customer by makeing your self visable on the net for their spam list indexing. going back tho the idea of giveing greif to spammers who get caught. I'm not above violence, put your self in their shoes what would make you stop doing something, a slap on the wrist, or a 45 to the head? last thing bofore I post this worthless post. if any of you get bored check out this web site, I'm sure it will piss you off as it did me. feel free to put this company out of business. www.send-safe.com

  18. that's not news anymore by giaguara · · Score: 1

    why is that story posted here NOW?
    it was published 6 december.

    or it should have been in the museum section, not news.

  19. Spammers?John Poindexter is getting a taste too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    John Poindexter is also getting a taste of his own medicine. Check out this article. They've got his address and everything.

  20. CmdrTaco is the King of Dupes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe he should be called KingTaco, he once even managed to post a dupe after his own story, which was already a dupe!!!!

    Taco, you're a legend. Do not ever change. Do not read a site called slashdot.org, that is.

  21. CmdrTaco needs..... by CSG_SurferDude · · Score: 3, Funny

    Let us alll forgive CmdrTaco on this cheerfull Sunday morning, since it's obvious thatCMDR TACO NEEDS TO DRINK HIS #$%#$% COFFEE before posting stories!

    1. Re:CmdrTaco needs..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Over here, it is NOT the morning, it is 14:25BWT ATOP, Its raining, and I'm stuck Inside trolling slashdot! and this story is a DOUBLE DUPE! Meaning its had two dupes!

  22. Hmm this really isnt new by aelfgar · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sending mail back to spammers really isnt new, I dont see why it hasnt become mainstreme. I get about 10-20 spam e-mails every day and I just reply to them. If you consider it, lets say a spammer sends out 1000 e-mail messages from his hotmail account. Now lets assume each one of these is 3k, if everyone replies to his e-mails and sends his own message back hotmail will shut down the account! There is no need to sign them up for anything special, just reply to their e-mails! So what if some of the are automated. I was getting spam from a company over a period of a year and kept replying to it every day. It turned out that there was a bot doining the mailing so my messages were never deleted, they just sat there. After 9 months I got an e-mail from them telling me to stop imediatly because their web-account had run out of space and their server suspended their account. Other people must have been doing this as well, or maybe my e-mails just built up over time. My point is this, always reply to ur spam mail, 3 or 4 times.

    1. Re:Hmm this really isnt new by Saint+Nobody · · Score: 5, Insightful

      never reply to your spam mail. sometimes the address will be forged, and you'll be harassing some poor shmuck. sometimes you're just replying to a bot that notes you as a valid email address. plus, if you do wind up on a spammer's bad side, you're probably more likely to be the victim of a forged address.

      by replying to spam, you're betting that your spammer is ethical. do you really want to make that bet?

      --
      #define F(x) int main(){printf(#x,10,#x);}
      F(#define F(x) int main(){printf(#x,10,#x);}%cF(%s))
    2. Re:Hmm this really isnt new by hector13 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      2, points:

      1) This has to do with sending real (snail) mail to a spammer, not email. It is a lot easier to filter out email then it is to go through 300+ letters a day to figure out if any of them are important.

      2) By replying to spam emails, you are probably doing yourself nothing but harm. I agree with your basic point, if everyone replied to every spam and swamped the spammer's network, it would work. Since that isn't the case, the only thing you are doing by replying is letting the spammer know that he has a valid email address.

    3. Re:Hmm this really isnt new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is just idiotic. You are completely oblivious. Replying to spams is always dumb. You do know they can fake headers, right? So you are probably replying to accounts the spammers are faking the use of. Or if the account is really a spammer's you are just guaranteeing that the account they are spamming is active.

    4. Re:Hmm this really isnt new by BlowChunx · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think the best thing to do is to bounce it back to the spammer. I know that both KDE's Kmail and MacOS X's mail.app have this feature.

      Essentially, it's better than replying. Not only does it go back to where it came, but it also looks like your email address is invalid, potentially removing it from spammer's lists. (Kind of like the Telezapper works for telespammers...)

    5. Re:Hmm this really isnt new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I'm in the process of shutting down two old email accounts and setting up new ones because I tried to reason with a couple of spammers. Now my accounts are being forged in the headers to make it look as if I am sending everything from porn to mortgage rates. Don't reply, just add to a filter and delete.

      Sadder and Wiser

    6. Re:Hmm this really isnt new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clueless fuck -- the addresses are NOT real. If there is an 800 number for more info or for sales, however, I always call it. So should you.

    7. Re:Hmm this really isnt new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you're really fucking stupid.

    8. Re:Hmm this really isnt new by Yo+Grark · · Score: 2

      ARE YOU FUCKIN NUTS?

      Spammers harvest "VALID" emails by people who respond.

      Am I lying? Check out the source code of the "remove me" link some time.

      Can't believe you support people spamming everyone....

      Or maybe this is propaganda to harvest more emails...by getting more and more people to REPLY to those emails, you will make more money

      either way

      YOU'RE NUTS, and should be duped /.'d immediately.

      Yo Grark
      Canadian Bred with American Buttering

      --
      Canadian Bred with American Buttering
    9. Re:Hmm this really isnt new by MonkeyBoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I hate to break the news to you, but of all the spams I've received over the past 2 days, not a single one was SENT from the account that is listed on the reply-to address. In fact, if you read the contents of the spam, you'll usually see them point replies to a completely different address, and "remove" requests to another (usually bogus) address. In not a single case does the subnet of the sender, nor the mail server used to relay the message, match any email address contained within the spam.

      Now, that's not to say that there are idiots out there who are ignorant enough to send spam with their own return address via their ISP's mail server, nor do I mean to say that there aren't enough spam-friendly ISPs out there loaning bandwidth to spammers running their own server farms (like the scumbag weasel $!@#$@# who's currently getting ever-increasing amounts of old-fashioned junkmail). I'm just saying that it's unlikely your actions will cause the effect you intend, as spammers who operate in the manner you need are in the minority.

      --

      Moof!

    10. Re:Hmm this really isnt new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why replying to the spam is a dumb idea:

      Look at this attempt to relay that failed.

      Dec 14 21:22:31 tandem sm-mta[2366]: gBF3MTvb002366: ruleset=check_rcpt, arg1=, relay=user61.net261.oh.sprint-hsd.net [208.17.69.61], rejec
      t=550 5.7.1 ... Relaying denied
      Dec 14 21:22:31 tandem sm-mta[2366]: gBF3MTvb002366: ruleset=check_rcpt, arg1=, relay=user61.net261.oh.sprint-hsd.net [208.17.69.61], reject=5
      50 5.7.1 ... Relaying denied
      Dec 14 21:22:31 tandem sm-mta[2366]: gBF3MTvb002366: ruleset=check_rcpt, arg1=

      , relay=user61.net261.oh.sprint-hsd.net [208.17.69.61], rejec
      t=550 5.7.1 ... Relaying denied
      550 5.7.1 ... Relaying denied
      Dec 14 21:22:31 tandem sm-mta[2366]: gBF3MTvb002366: ruleset=check_rcpt, arg1=, relay=user61.net261.oh.sprint-hsd.net [208.17.69.61], reje
      ct=550 5.7.1 ... Relaying denied

      Wanna bet these yahoo return addresses are either bogus or someone the spammer has on his/her list?

    11. Re:Hmm this really isnt new by blibbleblobble · · Score: 2

      It is a lot easier to filter out email then it is to go through 300+ letters a day to figure out if any of them are important.

      Yeah, especially if some of them look really like important bills and legal documents, or domain-name renewals.

      Oops, did I just suggest something?

    12. Re:Hmm this really isnt new by socalmtb · · Score: 1

      Hey! Not a bad idea, if it actually gets to the spammer. But if it does, you can expedite the process by sending large attachments.

    13. Re:Hmm this really isnt new by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 2

      I'm constantly getting "Undeliverable Mail" notifications for spam that has me listed as the sender. Were I actually sending people these e-mails, I would absolutely deserve whatever bitch-slapping my recipients decided to inflict. But I'm not.

      Reverse harassment is a dangerous game, because the person you harass may be just as much a victim as you are.

      BTW, can anyone give me advice on how to track down the guy who is sending these things on my behalf?

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    14. Re:Hmm this really isnt new by jkeychan · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the Klez virus to me. You can probably track down the original IP address of the person who is unintentionally sending you the virus. Here's some more info: http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc /data/w32.klez.removal.tool.html

    15. Re:Hmm this really isnt new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DUDE - You DONT reply to spammers... BAD IDEA - for 2 main reasons...

      1) Only 0.1% of spammers allow you to reply.
      2) Even if you can, it just lets them know you got their smut, and they'll just flag your Email as a good one, place mor value to it, and you'll get 10 times MORE mail. That's especially true if you opt out.

      Sometimes when I'm really pissed off, I find their web site, which usually has a forms page, and write a script that submits the forms page with fields like NO SPAM 100,000 times. Spamming the spammers.

      Not sure of the legality, but my program spoofs the IP address to look like it's coming in from Micro$oft.

      One time I submitted a "throw-away" hotmail address... they actually wrote back and said they would take me off their list. But (sigh) it was only the "throw-away" address... but it DOES get their attention, which was my intention all along.

      Another one threatoned to sue me... I told them to stick it where the sun don't shine and challanged them to find me. They informed me they had my IP address (Microsoft), and I laughed... then fired up my program and gave them 500,000 MORE forms page submissions to read.

      It sure keeps their server busy... :-)

      It'e pretty easy to do, you just have to get around the forms page error checking. I'm sure 80% of /. readers can do the same thing... So HAVE AT IT _ and FIGHT BACK NOW!

      -p

    16. Re:Hmm this really isnt new by AndroidCat · · Score: 2

      Remember, call-display blocking does not affect 800 numbers -- They will get the number you are calling from.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    17. Re:Hmm this really isnt new by funkdancer · · Score: 1

      If a spam lists a valid web site, I sometimes look up the site and sign up any support / sales emails I can find onto a selection of porn email lists guaranteed to make them receive spams for the rest of their lives.

      Plus I might just for the fun of it try to submit 500 orders of their penis enlarger product with all fields looking something like firstname: Spam, lastname: Hater. Address: F*ckspam, City: Spamville. Etc.

      At 29 I'm definitely not acting my age, but I take a fair bit of childish pleasure in hitting them back. I guess schädenfreude (or skadefryd in Norwegian) is the word. :)

      --
      ISO certified == THX certified
    18. Re:Hmm this really isnt new by Dunkirk · · Score: 2

      Gimme a break. This may have been true in the past, but I can't see how it's valid any longer. With the number of spams I bounce from my server every day - never responding to any of them - it's obvious that my email address is being sold around (and around) the globe. I used to do a fair amount of USENET back in the day, and now that Google has created their news search page, I'm toast. I'll never get away from it. As you can see, I made my address somewhat obvious and inflexible because I never wanted to change it again. That's a personal problem, but it's just that I don't think that any spammers are paying any attention to anything but the links they embed that point the responder to someplace that means, "Why, yes, Mr. Spammer, I would like to give you $5000 to put me at the bottom of some pyramid scheme." I actually have a friend who did this.

      Twice.

      Then declared bankruptcy.

      Spam won't stop until we educate everyone with email about it. I failed to intervene because I thought I had no business meddling in his affairs, but in retrospect, friends don't let friends reply positively to spam. Responding negatively won't mean anything anyway. I'm quite sure it all goes down a big black hole.

      --
      Acts 17:28, "For in Him we live, and move, and have our being."
    19. Re:Hmm this really isnt new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you tell us all how to get your program?

  23. In Typical Slashdot fashion by CrackedOutJesus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Let's blame Microsoft. I'm sure Bill Gates has something to do with this too...

  24. I was hoping by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 5, Funny
    I was hoping that this was a report of Ralsky being hospitalized for paper-cuts because of all that spam.


    If anyone is sued by Ralksky, get discovery! Get his spams and make them public so that 1000s of people can file lawsuits against him for spamming.

    1. Re:I was hoping by AntiNorm · · Score: 2

      If anyone is sued by Ralksky, get discovery!

      I know what you're saying here, but my first thought when I read this sentence was "You and me baby ain't nothing but mammals so let's do it like they do on the Discovery Channel." Maybe Ralsky needs to be sent to prison for a while so his cellmates can start saying this to him.

      (In case you don't know, the above quote is from BhG's 'Fire Water Burn')

      --

      I pledge allegiance to the flag...
      of the Corporate States of America...
    2. Re:I was hoping by arnex · · Score: 2

      In case you don't know, the above quote is from BhG's 'Fire Water Burn'.

      No, actually it's not.

    3. Re:I was hoping by AntiNorm · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you're right. I realized that right after I clicked Submit. Oops :P

      --

      I pledge allegiance to the flag...
      of the Corporate States of America...
    4. Re:I was hoping by AndroidCat · · Score: 2
      Maybe Ralsky needs to be sent to prison for a while so his cellmates can start saying this to him.

      Oddly enough, there is another spammer known as "Bubba Catts". Google for him. (You'll find his address. :^)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  25. Re:"They're Out of Their Minds..." sure :-/ by giaguara · · Score: 1

    if you are pissing me off doing something, and i do exactly the same thing to pay it to you back, why would that be "out of mind" ? ookay spammer, you spam me, and once i got tired of getting 150 spams a day; if i find your email addys be sure you will be subscribed to every spam newsletter i ever find!!

  26. So that's the first item on my xmas list sorted... by dreamquick · · Score: 1

    1) Get a spammer to publically complain about being sent unsolicited junk.

    2) Wait for RIAA for get busted for music piracy then try to appeal on the grounds that this was just "fair use" of that music.

    Well #2 might not happen but hell I'd have said that about #1 as well! After all it is almost xmas and if I wish hard enough it might just happen...

    - Tony

  27. Re:Most of *my* spam is spoofed by meldir · · Score: 1

    But that might be because my sysadmin doesn't do DNS checks at the SMTP server... Especially mail with the From header set to a Hotmail address is often spoofed. Unfortunately, this address might exists and the owner can't help it. As for hotmail, spoofs are easy to filter out without actually parsing the Received headers. But if I feel like replying or sending abuse mail, I *always* parse the received headers.

  28. Re:Please help me! by haggar · · Score: 2

    I imagine the poor bastard who's email you posted is just some guy that you have some gripes with. Most readers will, I believe, ignore you, but if only 20% get in the trap, this guy's e-mail is toast.

    If he's really a spammer, post some proof of it, non-anonymously.

    --
    Sigged!
  29. Now for Phase 2 by NeuroManson · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sign him up with every mailing list for porn magazines, and several Christoid magazines. Also pay a few bucks for an order of Jack Chick tracts (www.chick.com).

    Better still, spoof his IP, and create accounts on known Al Qaeda supporter websites, so the next knock he gets on the door will be from the FBI. Imagine his glee when all his funds are snatched up as money tagged to support terrorism.

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    1. Re:Now for Phase 2 by sporty · · Score: 2

      3. Profit!

      We've finally gotten it! It's like the monkeys.. and shakespear thing.. I knew it wasn't an NP problem :)

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    2. Re:Now for Phase 2 by sg_oneill · · Score: 2

      Nah... Need not pay anything. I'm sure someone could make sure he pays for all he consumes...

      And I'm sure he'd LOVE some pizza!

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    3. Re:Now for Phase 2 by sbaker · · Score: 2

      Hmmm - he promised his wife he wouldn't email porn...now I wonder if someone
      could get him in deep trouble with his missus by faking porn from HIS address
      - now THAT would be punishment enough :-)

      --
      www.sjbaker.org
  30. Anti-Spam Activist Threatened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    Dear SlashDolts,

    Why re-post old news when there's new news available? Interesting new news, as a matter-of-fact. See:

    http://www.freep.com/money/tech/mwend13_20021213.h tm

    Suff That Matters, eh? Right.

    1. Re:Anti-Spam Activist Threatened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where is the Una Bomber when we NEED him? Free Kazinsky! Re-arrest Mitnik!

    2. Re:Anti-Spam Activist Threatened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is an extended thread in NANAE: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8 &oe=UTF-8&threadm=uvm28r5skoi576%40news.supernews. com&rnum=3&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dralsky%2Bgroup:news. admin.net-abuse.email%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF -8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26sa%3DG%26scoring%3Dd
      as well as a URL http://www.geocities.com/leftreveggplant/ with the account and pictures of Ralskys house

    3. Re:Anti-Spam Activist Threatened by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Informative
      Let's clean that up at bit.
      NANAE URL from Hell account and pictures

      I haven't tried the NANAE link. I'm already there, and something bad might happen if I meet myself.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:Anti-Spam Activist Threatened by Ponty · · Score: 2

      Wow. What an ugly house. It's a shame people don't have taste anymore. If you're going to spend $750,000 on a house, why not buy a slightly less conspicuous place that isn't fifteen feet away from another $750,000 house? Nothing says "conspicuous new money" more than a bug ugly thing with columns and no lawn and no privacy.

    5. Re:Anti-Spam Activist Threatened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ponty wrote: It's a shame people don't have taste anymore.

      Um, dude? Remember the kind of... induhvidual we're talkin' about here. Spammer, remember? One with a criminal record, no less.

      You were saying about "taste?" ;)

    6. Re:Anti-Spam Activist Threatened by Ponty · · Score: 2

      It's been my experience that criminal records or past have nothing to do with taste. A convicted Watergate participant who spent time in jail lives near me and has a lovely, tasteful house. I'm not sure where Watergate and spammer fit on the Bad Guy Continuum, but I think my point's still valid.

    7. Re:Anti-Spam Activist Threatened by dacarr · · Score: 2
      He says he just throws it away and it doesn't bother him, which is contrary to the last message saying he was quite distraught.

      On one hand, this is so good to know that he's getting this stuff.

      On the other hand, consider that it's very easy to forward "real" mail to a post office box.

      --
      This sig no verb.
    8. Re:Anti-Spam Activist Threatened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those who have harrassed the individual who took photos of Mr. Ralsky's house are using information that it very easy to obtain to do so.

      I had to call the DMV yesterday to find out why my registration renewal notice has not yet been sent to me (my reg. expires Dec 31). I called them up, and told them the problem, and provided them no personal information. They asked for my plate number which I gave, and they immediately said my name back to me. This incident was fairly disturbing, but what do you expect from the DMV?

      Combine the information retrieved above with a service such as Lexis Nexis (www.lexis.com) and you can obtain all sorts of information about a person, including their driver's license number, creditors, past and present addresses, mortages, bankruptcies, whether they own airplanes and/or boats, etc. Lexis is used by attorneys for legal purposes, but there's not much preventing it from being used by Ralsky's faux thugs.

      If I were this person I'd take the threats against me with a grain of salt (keep in mind I'm just another anonymous Internet idiot here though). These people are using some fairly lame scare tactics to (try to) get underneath this guy's skin. If the individual who is being threatened is of the clever and scheming sort, it might not be too hard for him to lure his "attacker" out in the open far enough to get caught. These people are not professionals.

    9. Re:Anti-Spam Activist Threatened by AndroidCat · · Score: 2

      Regardless of his criminal record, would he spam for penis pills and p0rn if he had any taste? Would he spam at all? (He's lying about not spamming porn in the article by the way. Spammer Rule #1)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    10. Re:Anti-Spam Activist Threatened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Nothing says "conspicuous new money" more than a bug ugly thing
      > with columns and no lawn and no privacy.

      Lawn? Lawn? Trees, man. If I were spending even a tenth of that
      amount on a house, you can bet your left gonad there would be some
      trees in the yard.

    11. Re:Anti-Spam Activist Threatened by jonadab · · Score: 2

      > It's been my experience that criminal records or past have
      > nothing to do with taste.

      That's true. I know plenty of people who (as far as I know) are
      law-abiding citizens but who have grotesquely bad taste. (On the
      bad taste scale, grotesquely bad is a couple of levels beyond
      bad and just one step shy of blinking lime green Courier New on
      a megenta background.)

      > I'm not sure where Watergate and spammer fit on the Bad
      > Guy Continuum

      Not even comparable. Watergate was a case of getting caught doing
      something illegal and underhanded, yes, but it was a case of getting
      caught doing that to a rival organisation that, you can be stone cold
      certain, was busy trying to think of a way to get away with doing
      approximately the same thing to the perpetrators. Politicians
      sneaking around doing illegal things to other politicians before
      they do something to them first. (Politics is a dirty game; you
      don't run for public office at the federal level if you can't handle
      the possibility someone might try to spy on you illegally. Sure,
      if you can catch them you nail them with it; their bad for getting
      caught; make sure you sweep your own dealings under the rug. Did
      I mention that politics is a dirty game?) Yes, it's illegal, and
      yes, it's wrong, and yes, all the ones we catch should pay the
      price, in jail if possible. But politicians spying illegally on
      other politicians is wrong in the same sense that it's wrong for
      mob hit men to assasinate other mob hit men. It's wrong, but it's
      only worth so much of society's resources to try to prevent it.

      Spammers prey on people who have never heard of them and don't
      want anything to do with the whole business. That's different,
      not because the spammer himself is any more guilty (guilty is
      guilty), but because it's more important for society to act as
      necessary to stop it. If spammers mostly just sent junk email
      to other spammers, I'd say "sure, it's wrong, but who cares?"

      Now, about that spammer: who has the nads to try to call him
      1-800-COLLECT?

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    12. Re:Anti-Spam Activist Threatened by Ponty · · Score: 2

      That's what I mean. Lawn, garden, trees, something to make your place distinct from the other hulking ugly brick monstrosity that's next door.

    13. Re:Anti-Spam Activist Threatened by DarklordJonnyDigital · · Score: 1

      In other news, RIAA members secretly disguised as Slashdot editors have discovered that by posting the same message 156 times, it's equivalent to 421 real messages. Seven hundred and twenty slashdot posters posted comments to the story, saying 'Unsubscribe', with fifteen others instead taking the side of 'Unsubscirbe'.

      CowboyNeal was quoted as saying, "It's just what we need for a slow news day. I mean, 0.2% of readers won't notice the difference, but when you've got eleven million readers, that's still a sizeable figure."

      CmdrTaco|Away was unavailable for comment.

    14. Re:Anti-Spam Activist Threatened by Delirium+Tremens · · Score: 2

      It seems like the tag of black car can be read from one of the pictures, no?
      Should be an easy job for the police...

  31. Yay! by shivianzealot · · Score: 1

    Social justice is a beautiful thing. You know, I bet Fritz Hollings' mailbox isn't very heavy...

    --

    Bored with karma, be a fan/freak

    1. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fritz wants some free pron? Your wish is my command.

  32. Clearly everyone has missed the best story... by Munra · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Clearly the best story on that page is the genius of the person using Fedex's parcel tracking to find out where Santa lives :)

    Tracking a package to Santa

    South Haven photojournalist David McCreery uses Federal Express a lot and is fascinated with the tracking feature on the FedEx Web site (www.federalexpress.com) that lets you watch as your package makes its way to its destination.

    "I send FedEx packages every few weeks," he says. "Once, I sent a package to Bowling Green and watched it leave Michigan via Flint for Memphis, come back to Flint and then drive to Ohio."

    So, this being the holiday season, he decided to FedEx a letter to Santa, wondering: "How far would a package to the North Pole go? How would it get there? Where would it end up? Who would sign for it?"

    You can follow the progress of his letter on his personal Web site (www.davidm.net), where he posted his letter and the FedEx tracking number.

    Read the results, linked from here, over here.

    1. Re:Clearly everyone has missed the best story... by CokeBear · · Score: 2

      Looks like Santa Claus is still at his summer home in Colorado.

      --
      Reality has a liberal bias
    2. Re:Clearly everyone has missed the best story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmm maybe he should've entered Santa's proper mailing address:

      Santa Claus
      North Pole
      HOH OHO
      Canada

      He would've been guaranteed to have an answer if he had done so. I'm not joking, check it out:
      http://www.canadapost.ca/personal/dec/santa/ writes anta/default-e.asp

    3. Re:Clearly everyone has missed the best story... by razmaspaz · · Score: 1

      It would be interesting to try this thru UPS and see if it ends up in the same place.

      --
      I tried for 5 years to come up with a clever sig...only to realize that I am not clever.
    4. Re:Clearly everyone has missed the best story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on folks, everyone knows Santa's address:

      Santa Claus
      North Pole, NWT
      Canada H0H 0H0

  33. dupe story, but welcome by aggieben · · Score: 1

    This story has been posted before, but it's a welcome reminder of how justice is one of the ideals of our country. :-)

    --
    Don't become a regular here, you will become retarded. -- Yoda the Retard
  34. /. editors don't read the papers they cite by ravenwolff · · Score: 5, Funny

    Very interesting and sure to be controversial study that suggests most /. editors don't read the papers they cite. This means that if one paper misreads a work the misreading propagates. It's a very interesting study and has big implications for geeks, in my opinion. /. has a good overview of the work. Given that most attention to work has been in sloppy work on the experimental side (poor methadology or outright fraud) this suggests a whole other problem. A lot of the ultimate problem is that many in /. are concerned more about publishing than in solving the issues they investigate. Ideally the point both in science and in academics in general is to understand the ideas. Yet those of you who've looked up footnotes realize that actually engaging the ideas of other editors typically falls by the wayside. Often footnotes are there simply because references are needed. Engaging others works is secondary. I've always thought that the hard geeks were more immune to that effect than the humanities. I guess not."

    1. Re:/. editors don't read the papers they cite by LunarOne · · Score: 1
      Very interesting and sure to be controversial study that suggests most /. editors don't read the papers they cite.
      This comment sounds like it was written by someone who is miffed by Slashdot stories such as this one.
      --

      Read my sig if you like, but I'll never see yours, thanks to Discussions, Viewing, Disable sigs...
  35. What about his lawyer? by wowbagger · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Considering that /. listed the lawyer's address as well, what is happening to the lawyer and the law firm?

    1. Re:What about his lawyer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I called his lawyer after this was posted before and wasted their time for about 10 minutes about some drug charges, I did my part.

    2. Re:What about his lawyer? by shfted! · · Score: 1

      I signed them up for a few fetish catalogues >:D

      --
      He who laughs last is stuck in a time dilation bubble.
  36. Spam Information Network by zachjb · · Score: 1

    Yeah. I agree. Perhaps we could come up with some sort of identification network where we could try and pin point spammers, get their addresses, and then send them tons and tons of letters.

    Hell we could even sign them up for magazines and catalogs. Then maybe they would understand how much pain they bring us.

    --

    --If only there was a license required to use a computer.
  37. Yes, Taco... by BiOFH · · Score: 1, Redundant

    And it was interesting 9 days ago, too... after we started it. Here... on Slashdot... you know Slashdot?

    Congrats on your marriage. Now, could you get caught up on previous posts before putting anything else up?

    --
    - I am made of meat.
  38. Hypothetically by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    PRinting up pages of mailing labels and putting then on every postage paid return to sender for subscription postcard would speed this up. Vary the name slightly every too weeks to make sure he gets lotsa duplicates. Hypothetiaclly, of course.

  39. Re:Please help me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ali aka oGALAXYo, will you let it go already ? Stop sucking so badly.

  40. Another way of revenge! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Click here and click ALL THE ADVERTS! Its CPC, so they LOSE REAL MONEY every time you click! If every one on slashdot did it! They would be in ruins!

    1. Re:Another way of revenge! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CPC?

    2. Re:Another way of revenge! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cost per click

      I origanally seen this concept on spamrevenge.com

  41. Sworn to deliver... by Subcarrier · · Score: 1

    About a year ago a certain Finnish TV channel did the same in an effort to track down Osama bin Laden. The poor postman is probably still out there in Afganistan, trying to catch the bastard.

    --
    "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush
  42. Holy /. Paradox Batman! by skinfitz · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wouldnt mind, but not only has it been covered TWICE by /. already, it was BECAUSE it was on /. that the article referenced was even written!!!!

    ARRGGHHH!!!!

    1. Re:Holy /. Paradox Batman! by mcgroarty · · Score: 1
      I wouldnt mind, but not only has it been covered TWICE by /. already, it was BECAUSE it was on /. that the article referenced was even written!!!!

      And I hope it KEEPS getting covered until we can see some photos of his junkmail dumpster! :D

  43. bored this sunday morning by deus_X_machina · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you haven't already heard...

    Taken from http://www.spamhaus.org

    found here

    Alan M. Ralsky
    Telephone: 248-926-0688
    Current email address: amr777@comcast.net

    Address : 6747 MINNOW POND DR Property ID: 18-31-177-002
    City/State/Zip: W BLOOMFIELD MI 48322-2663

    Owner Name : RALSKY ALAN M Latitude : 42.5460
    Taxpayer Addr.: 6747 MINNOW POND DR Longitude : 83.4284
    City/State/zip: W BLOOMFIELD MI 48322-2663 Census Tract: 1566.00
    Block Group : 9
    City/Vill/Twn : WEST BLOOMFIELD
    Subdivision : BLOOMFIELD PINES SUB NO 2
    School Dist : WALLED LAKE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS
    Prop Category : RESIDENTIAL
    Land Use : SI SUBURBAN IMPROVED, TOWNSHIP ONLY

    --
    "In a Democracy, people get the kind of government they deserve." -Winston Churchill
    1. Re:bored this sunday morning by hardcode · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Cool, missile addresss, now to link him to Al Queda...

    2. Re:bored this sunday morning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe we should forward all the spam to him then.

    3. Re:bored this sunday morning by XorNand · · Score: 2


      Thanks!
      His new subsciption to Oprah magazine is on it's way. Merry Xmas Alan!

      --
      Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
    4. Re:bored this sunday morning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "His new subsciption to Oprah magazine is on it's way"

      God Nooooooo...

      Why not just drive there and shoot him in the head!? It would be far quicker and less painless...

      Oh, wait, he's a spammer. slow_painful_death = good. Ok, nice plan!!

    5. Re:bored this sunday morning by Holger+Spielmann · · Score: 1

      Great!
      So all I have to do is entering his coordinates in my USENET map database and I can employ this baby.

  44. Pretty pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With his money, he can hire someone to sort his mail

  45. Fuck him by SteweyGriffin · · Score: 1, Redundant

    This man's ailment is clearly a lack of empathy.

    Truly a common human deficiency.

    He will not be missed when the agents of karma take him out.

    Sorry to sound crass, but I really dislike spammers, trolls, and other annoyances.

  46. Re:Spammers?John Poindexter is getting a taste too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhh...this link has nothing to do with spam at all. It's a very left-wing diatribe about 'Amerika' by a liberal SF tabloid. Please mod the parent down.

  47. In fairness to Taco... by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1
    ... the original story got duped also. It's only fitting that the follow-up should be duped as well. :)

    Besides, honestly... even if one's seen it before, doesn't seeing it a second time (spam king Ralsky getting his just desserts) bring a smile to one's face? I could wake up to a story like this every day. :)

  48. Feedback? by SteweyGriffin · · Score: 4, Informative

    Please forward questions, complaints, and replies to:

    ALAN M RALSKY
    6747 MINNOW POND DR,
    WEST BLOOMFIELD, MI 48322

    Seller: BING CONSTRUCTION CO
    Property Address: 6747 MINNOW POND DR, WEST BLOOMFIELD, MI 48322
    Sale Date: 8/28/2002
    Recorded Date: 9/12/2002
    Sale Price: $ 740,000

    1. Re:Feedback? by Basje · · Score: 2, Interesting

      LOL. All the junkmail arriving there will actually drive the price of the house down too. Imagine, his whole lawn strewn with it

      --
      the pun is mightier than the sword
    2. Re:Feedback? by mcgroarty · · Score: 5, Funny
      Mr. Ralsky's feedback...
      Ralsky, who is one of the biggest senders of unsolicited bulk e-mail in the world, says anti-spammers have been harassing him for the past year. Lately, said Ralsky, anti-spammers started flooding him by snail mail with coupons, brochures and ads. "I just toss them right into the wastebasket," he said. "It doesn't bother me."
      That, from an article in Detroit Free Press.

      The immature thing to do here would be to take that as a challenge, or a suggestion that you're just not trying hard enough , or that you're not yet doing your part. But thankfully, we're all adults here, right?

    3. Re:Feedback? by vsprintf · · Score: 2

      But there's still no mention of magazines. What the hell is the holdup with Publisher's Clearing House?

  49. Did you forget ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you forget to sign up Laura Betterly? Shame on you people. Send her all the Pron she can handle. Sign her up for free condoms...fun and funny too!

  50. This is aweful... by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 1

    I mean, to send this guy all that junk mail... I thought my fellow slashdotters were more mature than that. I mean, nobody deserves to be harassed. Spam, be it junk snail OR e-mail, is annoying and resource consuming.

    Besides what did this guy ever do to... er... oh.

    --

    "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

    Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
  51. Re:What we really need by MickLinux · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... it sounds like what we really need is
    a mail transsender that strips the header, adds one of a number of randomly selected "please stop paying spammers" messages, and then mails the spam back to the spammer... or to the company that did it. The way to properly do this would be to only check out domain first, though.

    Then just automatically forward all spam to the anti-spam-bot, and let it go from there. 4000 emails to symantec? No problem.

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  52. Punishment for dupes by hubbabubba · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anybody got Taco's snail mail address? ;-)

    --
    Fried ice cream is a reality. - George Clinton
    1. Re:Punishment for dupes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, u justy made my day!

    2. Re:Punishment for dupes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CmdrTaco
      6747 Minnow Pond DR,
      West Bloomfield, MI 48322

  53. Please tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...that the Scientologists, the Mormons and Jehovah's Witnesses have all gotten requests for more information about their belief system from that spammer?

    Please??

  54. Definitely a repeat by Cmdr_Thisk · · Score: 1

    This was definitely already up here, reeeeeeedundant! :)

  55. What about his postperson? by cmeans · · Score: 5, Funny
    You've got to believe that this all this physical "junk mail" is causing problems for his local post person (if not the post office itself) too...maybe they'll go "Postal" on his ass just to lessen their work-load.

    1. Re:What about his postperson? by __aaxfhn309 · · Score: 1

      His carrier is probably making more in overtime than all of us combined.

  56. There oughta be a weekly profile... by mtec · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let's make 'dup think' work for good, not evil...

    Spammer of the week.

    Ya' know - a puff piece profile. Who they are, what they do in their spare time, what their favorite color is, name address and phone number, shirt size...

    I'm serious. Why not?

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  57. Heh... by KillerBob · · Score: 1

    "They've signed me up for every advertising campaign and mailing list there is. These people are out of their minds. They're harassing me."

    Aww... cry me a river, jackass. The only difference between this and what you're doing is that this is using paper. (pity there isn't a more environmental solution available). What makes you think that the rest of the world likes the crap that you're sending out, hmm?

    So... um... if he actually succeeds with his harrassment lawsuit, where do I send the cheque for the harrassment counter-suit?

    --
    If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    1. Re:Heh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a tree, I would gladly give my life for this worthy cause.

    2. Re:Heh... by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 2

      (pity there isn't a more environmental solution available)

      What if we erected bilboards on the sidewalks (or some other area off his property) that only face his house, with ads for things that get spammed to us such as debt reduction, penis enlargement, baldness cures, etc. They have to be obnoxious ads in all caps with misleading titles. Maybe we can put some Retina-Scorcher(tm) floodlights on them too so he'll see them bright as day even though his eyelids.

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
    3. Re:Heh... by jonadab · · Score: 2

      > What if we erected bilboards

      In his neighborhood, you'd probably need a zoning variance for that.

      > Maybe we can put some Retina-Scorcher(tm) floodlights

      Anybody got a spare airport beacon? Say, while we're getting a
      zoning variance, we could put in more than billboards across the
      street. A place of business, perhaps, something legitimate, though
      by pure coincidence it may be also a tad hard on property values.
      The ecconomy, being down, needs more industry, right?

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  58. Much, much better... by NineNine · · Score: 2

    This is much, much better. You don't have to give away your e-mail address, and you can be rest assured that they'll be getting email forever. Just make one post with their email address anywhere on Usenet. They'll be on spam lists for years, possibly even getting their own spam. Just one little post will set it off. A few spammers will pick it up, use it, sell it, re-sell it, etc.

    1. Re:Much, much better... by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      Do you run NineNine? If so, thanks for all the porn.

    2. Re:Much, much better... by NineNine · · Score: 2

      Sure do.

    3. Re:Much, much better... by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      So how do you pay for bandwidth?

  59. more effective... by jimberini · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is great, but he will eventually straighten this out, hire someone to sort out his real mail, or learn to deal. This will not deter him. To make this guy REALLY miserable, we should send the junkmail to his neighbors addresses with his name on it! This would be especially effective using the porn junkmail!!!

    1. Re:more effective... by AndroidCat · · Score: 2

      Just because they live near a spammer? And they'll get it long after AlRal is gone. Why not just toss a brick through their window? Get a grip people!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:more effective... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmmm... a friend of mine claims that he and a few other guys did a "nice" thing to their teacher - they put a gay porn magazine with the teacher's address on it in the teacher's neighbours mailbox (u know: oops! mailman made a mistake...)

  60. In other news.... by efatapo · · Score: 1

    I went to www.drudgereport.com shortly after reading this article on /. Turns out this is a very common way to aggravate your opposition. A news reporter ran a story about a government contractor involved with creating a database on all citizens that included name/phone number/address/relatives address and criminal history.

  61. Pics of the house + abusive calls... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    ...from Ralsky, or an associate.

    http://www.vatnebok.no/eggplant/

    mirrors:

    http://home.broadpark.no/~tareiers/
    http://www. 2mbit.com/egg/

  62. I can see the next headline by Audity · · Score: 1

    Spammer makes millions submitting the same story to slashdot over and over again.

  63. one more thought... by mtec · · Score: 2

    Call it...

    a Lifestyles of the Kitsch and Shameless...?

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
    1. Re:one more thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cake or Death? Izzard rocks!

  64. Ralsky gets even! by Skapare · · Score: 5, Funny

    Alan Ralsky, who may just be the world's biggest sender of internet spam, has been getting a taste of his own medicine. But now the tide may be turning, he reports.

    "They've signed me up for every advertising campaign and mailing list there is." he says. "But, I will get even. I know who they are and I know what to do." he adds with a mischievous grin.

    Reports have been coming in from all around the internet about the duplicates. First there was just one or two. Then there was ten. Yesterday there were a few hundred. And today, over twenty five thousand duplicate stories have been posted on the famous geek forum called Slashdot, where the campaign against Ralsky was hatched.

    "It's not me." says Ralsky, interviewed outside his home, which is surrounded by hundreds of postal bags because no more room remains inside. He adds "I don't do story submissions. Hell, I didn't even know the place existed until a few weeks ago."

    Another truck arrives, and 3 postmen deliver 25 more bags of mail. Over half the yard is covered in bags now.

    "I know who these guys are now. My lawyers were looking into this, but I've never heard back from them, so I just had to take matters into my own hands." says Ralsky as small snicker shows up in his grin. "It's all about getting even, and I know what these people hate the most; it's duplicate stories." he goes on saying "In Soviet Russia we didn't have people doing things like this; mail bags would deliver you away."

    Ask when all this might come to an end, Ralsky replied "You just wait until I try out all the mod points I managed to get."

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  65. MOD THIS UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hoo!

  66. Under a rock? by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny
    No, just doesn't get around as much any more, with that ball and chain around his ankle ;-)

    Damn, and I thought this was going to be a story about another dipsh!t getting his due.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  67. The two faces of Ralsky... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quote from original story, from Dec. 6:

    "They've signed me up for every advertising campaign and mailing list there is," he told me. "These people are out of their minds. They're harassing me." ... Ralsky is indeed annoyed. He says he's asked Bloomfield Hills attorney Robert Harrison to sue the anti-spammers.

    Quote from new story, Dec. 13:

    Ralsky, who is one of the biggest senders of unsolicited bulk e-mail in the world, says anti-spammers have been harassing him for the past year. Lately, said Ralsky, anti-spammers started flooding him by snail mail with coupons, brochures and ads. "I just toss them right into the wastebasket," he said. "It doesn't bother me."

    Gee, Alan, it bothered you enough a week ago to whine about it to a lawyer. What happened?

    He's become desensitized to the junk mail in a week-- time to redouble our efforts! Someone sign him up for the NAMBLA newsletter. Better yet, send him child pornography and tip off the cops when it arrives. :-)

    ~Philly

    1. Re:The two faces of Ralsky... by mtec · · Score: 2

      Well, you gotta expect the guy has more'n one face... He's a spammer!

      --
      Cake or Death? Cake Please!
    2. Re:The two faces of Ralsky... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Oh! That was his face?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  68. threats can work... by popmaker · · Score: 1

    ... I know this woman who was getting pretty pissed becasue of all the spam she got. So she started to reply, threatening to sue the companys in question. And it worked! Just make it soundlike you're a lawyer and know what you're talking about.

  69. Re:Please help me! by iain-ppo · · Score: 1

    Thanks :) I am that poor bastard. Yes, this is the new tactic of Ali Akcagaac, who has already 1) Writen to my boss to try to get me fired 2) Signs me up for mailing lists every weekend 3) Has signed me up to numerous spam sites 4) Started clicking on the "Email this article to a friend" links and filling my email address in. Oh, and I star in one of his anti-gnome rant "essays" All because I called him immature. He seemed to miss the irony. Hoohum, This is a new one though, put the /. effect to work so you don't have to. Does this mean I have a stalker?

  70. Any Updates by iCharles · · Score: 2

    The repost makes me wonder: are there any legitimate updates to the story? Is he still recieving tons of s-mail? How's his legal action going? Has he had an insight, and sworn off spamming? Anyone? Anyone?

    1. Re:Any Updates by zaren · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, there was an update:

      Free Press article:

      MIKE WENDLAND: Behind the scenes, spam's even uglier

      December 13, 2002

      Bloomfield Township spam artist Alan Ralsky is in the midst of yet another controversy, this time involving an anti-spam activist who says someone left him threatening telephone messages after he took photos of Ralsky's brand-new $740,000 house.

      The activist, Rich Clark of Warren, said he's reported the threats -- which were left on his answering machine -- to police. He said it all started last weekend when he drove to Ralsky's neighborhood to snap some photos for an anti-spam Web site.

      Clark said as he was taking his pictures from the street, someone left Ralsky's house, got into a black car and tried to block him from driving away. Clark said he maneuvered around the vehicle, but was followed.

      The next day, the phone calls started.

      "You don't know who the hell you were . . . with yesterday," began the first call. "You got the wrong guy. You don't even have the guy you think you do."

      The caller then gave details about Clark's home, his driver's license number, even the bank his car was financed through.

      A second call said: "I'm going to make your life so miserable you should watch every corner you go into, bro, every second."

      The next day, there was still another message. "Just waiting for you," it said. "You haven't heard the beginning of what's going to happen to you yet. Keep your eyes open."

      Clark provided me copies of the recordings. Are they from Ralsky? It was hard for me to tell. I asked Ralsky, and he said he knows nothing about it.

      "Come on," said Ralsky, "That's ludicrous. I'm not that stupid."

      He said he had no idea who was in the black car that Clark said left his driveway. "I don't have a black car," he said. "And I'm 57. I'm not about to go chasing anyone. But what was that guy doing taking pictures of my house for, anyway?"

      Clark says he took the pictures to post on an anti-spam Web site (he hasn't decided which one). He now plans to add the audio files from the phone messages.

      Warren police said Clark's report is on file, but there is no investigation in progress.

      Ralsky, who is one of the biggest senders of unsolicited bulk e-mail in the world, says anti-spammers have been harassing him for the past year. Lately, said Ralsky, anti-spammers started flooding him by snail mail with coupons, brochures and ads. "I just toss them right into the wastebasket," he said. "It doesn't bother me."

      You might also want to check the following Usenet thread in news.admin.net-abuse.email:

      Google News

      which includes links to mp3s of the threats left on his answering machine.

      --
      Come to the University of Mars! Classes starting soon!
    2. Re:Any Updates by Eggplant62 · · Score: 2

      I've posted my story on a website here. I got too curious and decided to go for a ride, since this guy was right on the way home from a service call at work. Best to hit the photo mirrors here so the photo sites can be a bit more distributed.

      I had a story submission on this that Taco and his bunch have sat on since Friday morning. Why?

      Rich

    3. Re:Any Updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite a story, is it just me or does it sound like guy leaving the threatening messages is reading from a script?

  71. Re:Spammers?John Poindexter is getting a taste too by martyn+s · · Score: 1

    Don't listen to him. It might not have to do with spam, and you might not like the particular article he linked to, but the story is pretty relevant. It's about people on the internet, using the internet, to give people a taste of their own medecine. Whether spam, or "total information awareness", the stories are pretty similar.

  72. Re:Spammers?John Poindexter is getting a taste too by TheLink · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's not a taste of his own medicine.

    A taste of his medicine would mean everyone keeping track of where he is going and what he is doing. e.g. everyday someone sticks gps modules on his cars and puts the info on a website. Someone pointing a webcam at his front door (not his bedroom window).

    People calling up his home phone number and pestering him or his wife is something totally different. That's like telemarketing.

    BTW the article sucks too. No imagination. Sure you don't like that person or what he's doing, but how does asking members of the public to call his home phone help?

    The article also talks about California seceding. Where does CA get water from? They are going to have to build a lot more waterworks from north to south. Not sure if north CA has enough water to cover the south's needs as well as its own. I'm sure some states would be fine with CA leaving, since they'll have a better chance of getting their fair share of water. Mexico might even start seeing the Colorado _river_ again.

    The US-ca could start charging California a lot more for electricity from the Hoover Dam too.

    Then the US-ca could indulge in a bit of schadenfreude: watching everyone in California battle each other over the power and water issue: the usual "no nuclear power", "no fossil fuel plants", "not in my backyard" etc.

    Silly article.

    --
  73. Re:Please help me! by haggar · · Score: 1

    Yes, this is definitely stalking, and if you can collect enough evidence, do take legal action. I hope your boss is aware of the situation.

    Good luck!

    --
    Sigged!
  74. Funny.... by PunchMonkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    Funny... I thought Groundhog day wasn't until February...

    --
    I'll have something intelligent to add one of these days...
  75. Re:Please help me! by sg_oneill · · Score: 2

    Mate, I'd just suggest gettign a new email addy and letting him know it's restraining-order time if he keeps it up.......

    Conflict resolution..It's anifty thing.

    --
    Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
  76. To /. editors by Espectr0 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    How hard can it be to implement a link check in submissions? It can check for older articles, say a month or so, to see if that link was referenced in another article. (it should not check the entire article database because that would be expensive!)

    Why are the editors so clueless? Do they read what they post? (i think they do since they deny so many articles)

    Well they should have better memory than we do

    1. Re:To /. editors by sopwath · · Score: 1
      Do they read what they post?



      Perhaps some type of peer review before the post gets to the front page. Even if its just among the editors, they wouldn't have to worry about voting ratios like on K5, they could setup some way of getting two other mods to say, "Yes go ahead and post that." Three yes' means it goes to the front page. A no means it doesn't.



      This really shouldn't be that hard, for someone who runs Slashdot anyway.(I personally couldn't do it easily) I understand the editors are busy people, but a simple checkbox style aproval wouldn't take more than a few seconds.

  77. Now that everyone knows who he is... by exceed · · Score: 2

    Now that everyone knows who he is I get the feeling some crazed anti-spammer is going to go kill the poor guy. I mean, some of us really do hate spam that much, don't we?

    --

    void women (int money, time_t time);
    1. Re:Now that everyone knows who he is... by Backov · · Score: 1

      We can only hope and pray.

      Pray with us now, Children.

      --
      In the law there is no overlap between theft and copyright infringement whatsoever.
  78. Re:Please help me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are usually 2 sides of the Blade. You can't blame the one and ignore the mistakes of the other. Go to http://www.gnomesupport.org/ and other places and look how Iain Holmes permanently attacks Ali. Every complaint or negative comment on certain lists (even those from various countries) are placed into the catgegory of Ali by Iain without proper proves. You give the right of the one to take any legal actions and take the other the right to do the same ? Go there and look yourself.

    - Baltasar

  79. Re:Please help me! by iain-ppo · · Score: 1

    Every complaint or negative comment that comes from the t-dialin.de IP range I claim is ali, simply because the grammar and content is usually the same.

  80. Ralskys House by spacefight · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I guess you're all interested in this, ok, more or less :) Yes, the Jaguar actually followed the spotter and he got threaten on his voice mailbox. Mirrors here.

    1. Re:Ralskys House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Backup the money truck...Sounds like you could sue if he is found to be the one behind the threats!

      Those answering machine messages are terroristic threats. I am quite suprised that the local police are not investigating.

      I would imagine that they are waiting for something bad to happen prior to doing a full investigation.

      -ACoward

    2. Re:Ralskys House by mcknation · · Score: 1



      If you zoom in photo that has the car in the driveway the plates have been blured out.
      Why is that? I kinda wanted to play with the Jag's plate numbers.

      McK

    3. Re:Ralskys House by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 1

      I know those are high-res pics, but don't focus on the plates... You'll noticed everything is "blurred out". It's obviously motion blur.

      --
      People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
    4. Re:Ralskys House by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      It was a cheap disposable camera. (And it kept firing the flash, which was a bit of a give-away.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:Ralskys House by mcknation · · Score: 1



      I don't think so. The photo I'm talking about (the only one where it's possible to see the plates) has obviously been altered. There is what looks like a rectangle of blur over where the plates are. If you zoom out to regular size...even with it being a cheep throw away camera the picture looks clear enough to where you should be able to pick out the plates.

      Had it been me chased by someone in a Jag I would have *made sure* that I got the plate numbers.

      McK

    6. Re:Ralskys House by jonadab · · Score: 2

      > If you zoom in photo that has the car in the driveway the plates
      > have been blured out.

      Photographs are always like that when you get to the limit of their
      resolution. The image just doesn't have enough information to pull
      out the plates. You have to zoom all the way in just to see for
      sure that there *is* a plate, and it's about six pixels high. It
      would, however, be easy enough for someone with a lot of spare time
      to watch his street over several weeks and see if a black jaguar
      comes to and from his house frequently... that wouldn't prove it
      was the same car, but it would provide a good lead for further
      investigation. Of course, asking somebody to have that kind of
      spare time is a little much. A hidden webcam might be a more
      realistic approach...

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  81. New picture of The House that Spam Built by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Funny

    He's made a few modifications to reflect the business that he runs from his house. (Hope he's got a business licence for that.) Enjoy!

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  82. Strange co-inkydink by mtec · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was looking up some information about Sir Walter Raleigh and I came across a new word!

    'Ralsky'

    SYLLABICATION:
    ralsky

    PRONUNCIATION:
    ral - skee

    ADJECTIVE: Inflected forms: ralskeer , ralskyest 1. Slow to learn or understand; obtuse. 2. Tending to make poor decisions or careless mistakes. 3. Marked by a lack of intelligence or care; foolish or careless: a stupid mistake. 4. Dazed, stunned, or stupefied. 5. Pointless; worthless: a stupid job. 6. Boasting to a newspaper writer ill- advisedly


    ex.He ralskyed about his windfall and then the IRS confiscated his belongings Huh! Go figger...

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  83. Get yourself off some lists easily by stomv · · Score: 4, Informative

    We don't like direct marketers, but we should have the least amount of venom for the The Direct Marketers Association. They maintain legitimate opt-out lists for email, telephone, and junk mail. Not every "marketer" uese 'em, but those that do use the lists only use them to opt customers out.

    If it reduces just some of the harassment, isn't it worth it?

    Less junk mail
    Fewer telemarketers
    Less spam

    And BTW: don't be lazy and use the $5 Internet option. Print out the page and pop it in the post for less than 10% of the cost.

    1. Re:Get yourself off some lists easily by AndroidCat · · Score: 2

      As far as anyone can tell no one uses those lists -- except as a source of valid email addresses to add to their next "millions" CDROM.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Get yourself off some lists easily by Steve+B · · Score: 2
      They maintain legitimate opt-out lists

      Do they also maintain honest swindlers, virginal prostitutes, and pacifistic terrorists?

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
  84. Nyet. by TheLink · · Score: 2

    In Soviet Russia - people queue up for spam...

    And that's just to _look_ at the one and only can (it's not for sale after all). ;)

    --
  85. y'know I think they shoulda classified that... by mtec · · Score: 2

    as a verb...

    Stupid dictionary.

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  86. Best Spam Stopping Methods? by mwmurphy · · Score: 1

    Man, the Internet seems like it's becoming an ad zone. Banner ads aren't bad, but it's the popups that drive me crazy. I've tried a few programs to stop them but none of them seemed to work. Does anyone have any kickass foolproof method (other than pitching their computer out the window)?

    1. Re:Best Spam Stopping Methods? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.mozilla.org has the answers you seek, my child.

    2. Re:Best Spam Stopping Methods? by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      If you use a Macintosh, get iCab. It prevents JavaScript from opening windows that are not requested by the user, and can filter out banner ads by size or URL.

      Windows users might wish to try Opera. While not quite as flexible as iCab, stopping popups is easy with Opera.

      FInally, ask your ISP to start using Spamassassin. My ISP recently began using SpamAssassin and now, I can go for days without getting any spam, and the two or three that do slip through are helpfully labeled with a (SPAM?) tag by SpamAssassin.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    3. Re:Best Spam Stopping Methods? by mwmurphy · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I saw one called spamarrest a few days ago that blocks spam by making you click to verify before the message gets through and then you are on that person's approved list but it is a pay service.

    4. Re: Best Spam Stopping Methods? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well, I never see popup adds.
      I use Mozilla for linux. It is available for Win 95 thru XP, Mac 9 and X, Linux, HPUX, OS/2, AIX and Open VMS.

      It allows (with ease) the blocking of images just by right clicking on the image and then selecting 'block images from this server'.

      It has a setting the dis-allowes images to animate.

      It has a setting to not allow java script to do annoying things like open new windows (pop-ups and pop-unders)

      It has built in cookie and image managers etc... that go above and beyond any of the crappy 'add-ons' that claim to help you with your current browser.

      Ken

  87. Use Chimera on a... by mtec · · Score: 2

    Mac

    That works.

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  88. General cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Maybe that is the long sought general cure for spammers. Give their addresses to other spammers...
    In the each spam mail there is some contact info. Well, the email headers may be falsified but the advertisements with a false contact info to a advertised product/ company are plain stupid.
    When thousands of emails start coming after hiring "direct marketing company" for a campaign, even moron CEO will understand that it is not reasonable policy.

  89. In other breaking news.. by Coleco · · Score: 1

    ..the world trade towers have been hit by hyjacked planes. News at 11.

  90. Telemarketing???? by failedlogic · · Score: 1

    Question - How does one get Mr. Ralsky included on telemarketing lists. Home number and pager /cellphone ( if applicable) would surely be more annoying than junk mail - do to a /. increase in telephone calls.

    Doesn't Californina and a few other states have anti-spam laws? Why not just give him a summons to small claims court? Waste his time and get $5,000 in the process.

    Funny, he said he was pis*** from getting "junk mail" last week. This week he says it doesn't bother him as he just throws it out. Now which one is it?

  91. In case you missed it the first time... by gregsv · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...and want to have the satisfaction of signing Mr. Ralsky up for a few more mass mailers, here's his address which was posted the last time this story appeared.

    Buyer: ALAN M RALSKY
    Buyer Mailing Address:
    6747 MINNOW POND DR, WEST BLOOMFIELD, MI 48322
    Seller: BING CONSTRUCTION CO
    Property Address: 6747 MINNOW POND DR, WEST
    BLOOMFIELD, MI 48322
    Sale Date: 8/28/2002
    Recorded Date: 9/12/2002
    Sale Price: $ 740,000 (Full Amount)

    1. Re:In case you missed it the first time... by jonadab · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > the satisfaction of signing Mr. Ralsky up for a few more mass
      > mailers

      Signing him up for mass mailers lacks imagination and is easy for
      him to counter. (Bulk mail is usually obvious and easy to sort
      out.) Some better ideas...

      * Send him a personal letter in a hand-addressed envelope.
      (Don't be nasty; that would just be grounds for a lawsuit.
      You could explain why you don't like spam, though, and ask
      to be taken off all his lists. But be courteous about it.)

      * Send "pen pal" mail to a few hundred thousand third-graders
      with his name and return address. (This one might be illegal;
      consult a lawyer first. IANAL, just brainstorming here.)

      * Send him a can of Hormel product, nicely wrapped, with a
      gift card.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  92. How many lifetimes has he wasted? by sbaker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was always impressed by Steve Job's comment to the guy who was writing the Mac bootstrap code. The guy was complaining that it wasn't worth optimising the bootstrap loader any more because it was fast enough already. I don't Steve's exact words - but it was something like: We will sell 100 million of these machines - if each of those people boots their machine once a day for five years - then that's 15 billion reboots. If you can save just one second from the reboot time of the Mac then that's 480 YEARS saved.

    So shaving one second of the boot time is like saving the lives of 50 people. What
    could be a more noble activity than saving human lives like this.

    So - applying that math to this spammer: If he sends out ten million spams a day and it takes 1 second to delete each one - and if this guy does that every day for five years - then that's morally equivelent to murdering 50 people.

    Just because the damage he does to each individual is small, the cumulative damage is huge.

    There is another story (probably apochryphal) about the guy writing the banking system software who changed the code to take the roundoff error (less than a half cent) from every interest calculation and direct it into his personal account. The story goes that he made tens of thousands of dollars a week. This story probably isn't true - but should such a person be considered any less a criminal because the money he stole was spread so thinly? Obviously not - he stole those thousands of dollars and that's that.

    This spammer deprived the people of the world of 50 human lives - he should be considered a mass murderer and treated accordingly.

    --
    www.sjbaker.org
    1. Re:How many lifetimes has he wasted? by indiechild · · Score: 1

      he should be considered a mass murderer and treated accordingly

      you're kidding right? Sure we all hate spammers, but that comparison is just absurd.

    2. Re:How many lifetimes has he wasted? by Rich0 · · Score: 2

      If he sends out ten million spams a day and it takes 1 second to delete each one - and if this guy does that every day for five years - then that's morally equivelent to murdering 50 people.

      Considering your post made it to +5, do you realize how many /. readers you've just killed by the same logic? I wish I could say I only spent 1 second reading your comment... :)

  93. Unsolicted bulk mail prohibited; spammers will be by BeyondALL · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hehe - I just ran a e-mail validation on that mail-adress:

    [Contacting mx00.comcast.net [24.153.64.1]...]
    [Connected]
    220-mtain01 -- Server ESMTP ("Comcast Messaging System")
    220 Unsolicted bulk mail prohibited; spammers will be prosecuted
    HELO Network-Tools.com
    250 mtain01 OK, [66.46.181.116].
    VRFY amr777
    252 2.5.0 Possible remote address not checked.
    RSET
    250 2.5.0 Ok.
    EXPN amr777
    550 5.7.2 EXPN command has been disabled.
    RSET
    250 2.5.0 Ok.
    MAIL FROM:
    250 2.5.0 Address Ok.
    RCPT TO:
    250 2.1.5 amr777@comcast.net OK.
    QUIT
    221 2.3.0 Bye received. Goodbye.
    [Connection closed]

    --
    "If you keep an open mind people will throw a lot of garbage in it."
  94. And those lists are available to...? by Corvaith · · Score: 2

    It says that even non-members can 'take advantage' of the opt-out email list.

    So... any bets on how many of those non-members actually swipe the emails?

    They say they only provide the companies with the lists so that they can remove them, but how exactly do they go about *checking*?

  95. Damn link is still greyed out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I knew it was a dupe when the link was the "already clicked" color.

    Once again, /. wins the Award for Redundancy Award!

  96. You could do the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For people involved with the TIA program....like the CEO's of the contracting companies.

    Give the press something to chew on....

  97. Rasky = Electronic Stalker? by JenovaSynthesis · · Score: 1

    I had a thought. Rasky's activities may be in violation of Michigan Law.

    Michigan is one of the states that has ammended harassment/stalking laws to include electronic means of communication.

    Anti-Spam lawyers might want to look at MCL 750.411h.

    Rasky would definitely fall into the "Unconsented Contact" category.

    Full text at:

    http://www.michiganlegislature.org/mileg.asp?pag e= getObject&objName=mcl-750-411h&queryid=2419960&hig hlight=stalking

    --
    Anonymous Cowards generally receive no replies because you're a coward and I'm a bitch :)
    1. Re:Rasky = Electronic Stalker? by dacarr · · Score: 2

      How would you propose proving it's Mr. Ralsky sending you the spam though?

      --
      This sig no verb.
  98. Better plans yet ... by nano-second · · Score: 3, Funny
    Read this article (hilarious in it's own right) about the postal experiments

    In particular note the bit about the fish and seaweed being mailed: "postal supervisor warned our mailing specialist that he could be fined for mail service abuse, even as a recipient, should this happen again."

    I think just signing the guy up for mailing lists is missing out on the truly beautiful possibilities offered by the USPS.

    --
    I hope you're not pretending to be evil while secretly being good. That would be dishonest.
    1. Re:Better plans yet ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about record and book clubs? I mean,
      what could be more annoying?

    2. Re:Better plans yet ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite right. I nominate him as the new tooth fairy. Have all your children mail their teeth to him, and teach you children a valuable lesson about karma and revenge at the same time.

  99. California by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    California should be able to buy a few decent desalinization plants. The only reason they don't is that it is cheaper to get the water elsewhere.

    1. Re:California by thogard · · Score: 1

      Can't do that, when you pull the salt out, it has to go somewhere and you can't put it in the ocean and you can't landfill it (even on the great salt plains).

    2. Re:California by John+Sullivan · · Score: 1

      Why can't you put it back in the ocean? If you didn't, you'd be slowly desalinating the Pacific! (The water you pull out eventually makes it back there, so if the salt doesn't...)

      --
      This is my World Wide Web of Whatever
  100. Re:Dupe story? That's ok! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    It's a great chance to rake in the karma! Just go back to the original post and copy some of the +5 posts.

    On a more serious note, however, I have just right now been struck by a great (original) idea, and have decided to write this, a spontaneous and completely original, post:


    I am writing this article to request something for a terminaly ill boy.

    Alan M Ralsky is a seven year old boy who has terminal cancer. His ambition before he dies is to be included in the Guinness Book of Records as having the largest collection of post cards.

    My request is that EVERYONE who reads this posting send at least one post card to him at:

    Alan M Ralsky
    6747 Minnow Pond Dr
    West Bloowfield Township, MI 48322-2663

    Please pass this information on to as many people as possible. Let's make a child's dream come true before its too late.

    Best wishes.

    A hopeful person.
  101. Re:Spammers?John Poindexter is getting a taste too by Peahippo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To add and update a bit to this:

    Some guy came up with a plan to fill bags (100ft wide and 800ft long) with Northern CA river water (in excess) and tow them to Southern CA (where it's needed). Recently, this plan was shelved since one of the first steps (California-wise, at least) involved environmental-impact studies for the rivers the bags would be filled from. The studies would have cost $1 million per river.

    I think this sums up CA's problem; progress is definitely dampened by such reluctance to move into the unknown, and the level of assurance desired is simply too expensive. That, and the fact that you shouldn't build cities in the desert or even an arid land.

    To expand upon this article with personal opinion:

    I think the USA has more than lost national identity and will Balkanize within a generation. But like the Congress thinking that declarations of war are "anarchronistic" (ref. Rep. Ron Paul), actual secession will also be an anachronism. The secession will be accomplished by other means. A mixture of official and unofficial methods will be used to make sure that Californians stay in, and non-Californians stay out. We kind of have that kind of thing now, scattered over America as local policy; if you are a Black man, try wandering around your town's wealthier sections and see how long it takes before a cop stops you ... and takes you back home (... or to the "big house" ... remember, as soon as you stop moving on the public way, you are "loitering" and thus subject to arrest).

    To dimly predict, it might occur that the CA legislature votes for an "assurance bond" for people moving into CA. To live there, you must present $10000 in cash or a bond good for same to local authorities. Of course, this doesn't say "you can't live in CA", but for people unable to come up with $10K, it does say that ... and official language once again doesn't match unofficial intent. (I modeled this prediction on the experience of a petroleum engineer and his wife (a teacher) when they moved to New Zealand for a year. NZ required them to have $50K on hand just to get into the country.)

    Time will tell. That's the good part about the future ... it's going to arrive anyway, so you'll find out eventually.

    --
    [also misbehaves on Kuro5hin as Peahippo]
  102. Isn't this the second time I've seen this on /. by wtoconnor · · Score: 1

    Is ther so little real news that we have to see articles twice. This isn't the first time. The brittle star lens article ran about a year ago. We still haven't seen any new lenses from the research yet. Or maybe it was the BBC repeating them selves.

  103. So nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Delicious irony...

    And news so nice, it's best posted twice!

  104. Larry Niven was almost right by AndroidCat · · Score: 2
    When he wrote about the problem when a small fraction of everyone in the world can suddenly concentrate on a single location and overload everything.

    Substitute the Internet for teleportation and if, instead of "Flash Crowds", he'd called them "Slash Crowds"... :^)

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  105. just for informational purposes.. by chrispycreeme · · Score: 1

    ..what was the snail mail address of this spammer? please email chris@frognet.net with this information that i will not use in any way other than for strictly informational and educational puposes. thanx!

  106. AAAH!!! by kingofnopants · · Score: 1

    The slashddot editors are spamming us with the same article over and over again!!!

    --
    Disco Stu was talkin' to you.
    1. Re:AAAH!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      give him a break, i think taco just came back from his honeymoon.

  107. Well Alan Ralsky has hired a hitman! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.freep.com/money/tech/mwend13_20021213.h tm Seems he has hired a hitman/bodyguard now.

  108. It's been covered, true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    But it's funny as shit .

    If that prick or his attorney is reading this, I hope they realize the glee everyone shows about Ralsky's "distress" is going to be indicative of what they get if they take this to any jury.

  109. bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is bullshit. FedEx and UPS require an address to send your item to. You can't just write "santa clause" on it. You have to give them a name AND a destination.

    Can you say "fake"?

    1. Re:bullshit by rmohr02 · · Score: 2
      You have to give them a name AND a destination.
      Name: Santa Claus
      Destination: The North Pole
  110. If he *does* have paper cuts, send lemon juice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Lots of it.

    And hope some of the cartons break!

  111. Re:Please help me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just another attempt of you to make Ali look like a bad guy. You have no proves of what you are claiming. If you do have than instead of trolling in here show them. Prove it, otherwise shut up and stop placing real names all over. I have been reading some posts around and the only thing i can see coming out of your mind is Ali's name. This can only let me think that you are incredibly jalous and/or that he made you face a truth you do not like.

  112. new story here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
  113. Next time get back out and photograph the follower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Make sure you get the license plate.

    And then post those pix too.

  114. Re:Spammers?John Poindexter is getting a taste too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since DARPA is trying to develop a scent indentifier gizmo, mail him a stinky sock: "Hey Poindexter SMELL THIS!"

  115. Dupe is good! (sometimes) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this one should be a weekly reminder. 'Cause I wrote down the address last time, but by now I almost forgot about it!

  116. What about telemarketers calling him ? (dupe) by clarkie.mg · · Score: 2

    Hey let's go further, let's give his phone number to telemarketers. He is a supposed millionaire, I am sure he would be delighted to receive wonderful business opportunities by phone.

    I'm sure some slashdot reader knows someone who can insert him in some databases of people to "telemarket".

    Oh wait, why not sell his information. After all, others do it every day otherwise I wouldn't receive those calls for a security for my house.

    (Sorry if this post is redundant, I haven't read all the posts)

    --
    Men are born ignorant, not stupid; they are made stupid by education. Bertrand Russel
    1. Re:What about telemarketers calling him ? (dupe) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, send in some $5 donations to some of the agressive religous groups with his name and address.

  117. Re:Spammers?John Poindexter is getting a taste too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out this article [sfweekly.com]. They've got his address and everything.

    Um, yeah. And I've got George W. Bush's address too. (1600 Pennsylvania Ave., Washington D.C.) It's called "being a public figure".

  118. Re:Please help me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    t-dailin.de has nearly as bad a reputation amongst network and mail admins as does wanadoodoo.fr. Not a big surprise your harassing luser lives in that net space.

    What's a wonder to me is that the owners of those networks don't seem to care that their networks are becoming pariahs on the 'net. I've got both networks blocked for FTP access on all my Corp gateways due to repeated abuse, for example. And at least wanadoodoo blocked for FTP on my personal server.

  119. Lawsuit? by dacarr · · Score: 2

    Yes, this is a rerun. Would somebody tell me when he actually files the lawsuit?

    --
    This sig no verb.
  120. Redundant by DaytonCIM · · Score: 2

    Are the /. editors going to keep posting this same story every week?

    12/6 Story: HOWTO: Annoy a Spammer
    11/25 Story: Spam King Lives Large off Others' E-Mail Troubles
    11/22 Story: Another Millionaire Spammer Story
    11/13 Story: The Economics of Spam

    Enough already.

  121. Funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. snail mail with coupons, brochures and ads. "I just toss them right into the wastebasket," he said. "It doesn't bother me."

    That's interesting, weren't you complaining about this last time? I am betting this is not how you really feel, you are probably using this as PR to cover up that it did bug you, got a "I'm pissed off" reaction from you. I bet the person who chased Rich Clark and made the treats might be you(with something that changed his voice) or one of your spamming friends.

    As for the just tossing them into a waste bin, I wonder if something important, for example a bill for his house, might get lost in all that clutter.

    And we all know how with email we don't have to go through all the spam, we can just delete it all and will certainly not miss anything important. /sarcasm

  122. Question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone taken any photos of his /.ed mail box and put them online?

  123. Regarding the dupe thing... by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
    I don't know who has had the pleasure of having an article rejected because (and I quote an email I received from chrisd, I think) "... we posted something similar in July of '97, IIRC" or something to that effect. Now, I'm not bitching because I had a rejected article, that's not the point. But when it comes to ferreting out dupes of stuff submitted by other people, the "editors" have no match.

    Mod this down as redundant, but I think the "editors" should hold themselves to the same standards they apply to everyone else.

  124. I think you got the wrong spammer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought that was this spammer who would not do porn.

    Ms. Betterly says she refuses to send e-mails about adult fare, because it "disgraces society."

  125. In related news. by Zone-MR · · Score: 1

    A spammers private details such as address and even an aerial view of his neighbourhood were posted to slashdot. This enabled thousands of users around the world to subscribe him to every mailing list they knew of. In short, he got what he deserved.

  126. ralsky is an investor from what I read.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lots of people I know have been helping this guy out finding the right companies to invest in. It's really easy to get investor kits from companies through their online forms, so it's no wonder he has ordered so many kits to his house. I don't know what he's going to do with 80 kits dating back to 1980 from microsoft, but theres alot of other great companies out there who are eagar for investments from millionaires!

  127. Oh, he's pissed alright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Especially when his lawyer told him "No way in hell I'm taking this case and get deluged the same way."

  128. ralsky is an investor from what I read.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hes been getting tons of investor packs from me as well, through those convenient online forms that most companies have easy links to on their websites :-)

  129. Re:Spammers?John Poindexter is getting a taste too by vsprintf · · Score: 2

    I think this sums up CA's problem; progress is definitely dampened by such reluctance to move into the unknown, and the level of assurance desired is simply too expensive. That, and the fact that you shouldn't build cities in the desert or even an arid land.

    California's real problem is that it is so self-righteously "green". They've regulated themselves out of alternatives, which they displayed so well during the power outages (all the while claiming the problem was "deregulation").

    Now, the only course left is for California to use its huge congressional contingent to pass legislation that keeps upstream states from taking water from the Colorado river. I'm an ex-Angelino, and I think the solution to California's problems is to nuke LA. It couldn't be any more unlivable than it is now.

  130. Re:Spammers?John Poindexter is getting a taste too by Courageous · · Score: 2

    I used to get Green Mountain Power, but California did something to the legal climate that made them fold up shop. How this is categorized as "self righteously green" I can't imagine.

    C//

  131. New Anti-spam Tools coming.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A friend if mine is beta testing a new tool based on the Spambayes Python tool kit, that does a lot more then just filtering spam. Apparently this tool has a means of tracking the path the spammers use, and following the money trail, locates them rather effectively. With very little effort on the part of the user, it collects the spam, builds up a database of "repeat offenders", and compiles a complete report, and builds up lists of ISP's they use, and follows the money trail.

    We already know the FTC is getting 40,000 spam complaints a day, there is no way they can catch them all, but this tool puts together a report the FTC prefers, giving them all the info they need to go after them. I'm told by anonymous sources in the FTC they give these reports a much higher priority, because most of the work is done for them.

    It also verifies the authenticity of opt out email addresses and web site links.

    It's rumored it might possibly be shown at the anti-spam conference in Boston this Jan.

    I'm not at liberty to say who they are (for fear of the slashdot effect), but I'm sure you'll hear about it soon enough.

    It was written with the intent that if enough people provide the right kind of information for the prosicutors to catch the spammers, they would have an easier time to stop them.

    The really cool thing is this new tracking system they use, as spammers are getting a lot more clever about hiding their tracks.

    -sc

  132. Dupe check by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

    They talk about this somewhere in the FAQ that a simple link check often does work. So we get dupes even where the links are identical?

    The sanity check could compare the language of the cited articles for overlap, or a preponderance of keywords. I know the slashdot software is under continuous development, who knows what is in the works.

    But here, I think a pretty quick check for the spammer's name or the link would have done the trick. I don't know whether it was attempted, but if not that small time savings for the editor consumes many times the time of the posters.

  133. Duplicate stories... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, personally LIKE getting more FIGHT BACK stories about spammers. Keeping the issue alive is important, and the fact that spam mail has now exceeded legit mail in overall volume.

    In fact, it would be great to hear other people's stories on what they are doing to fight back. So Yes, keep the stories coming, but lets strive for some origionality and new stuff, and keep the FIGHT going.

    What really puzzlies me, is why people are'nt actually contacting their local representitives about this issue. With web sites and the internet, it's getting a lot easier to bring these issues to them. People ARE having success. I guess people are not quite pissed off enough to get to that stage and wear out their delete button instead.

    Every spam message I get, I sent to the FTC (uce@ftc.org) and am one of 40,000 others that do the same thing. My sources tell me they HAVE prosecuted more then 100 in the past month, handing down jail sentences and heavy fines.

    People are also not aware they can file Computer Abuse charges against spammers, because there are really NO federal laws keeping spammers in check, but there ARE laws against computer abuse. You just have to find a "gung ho" prosecutor to take your case.

    So, in conclusion - PLEASE LETS KEEP THE ISSUE alive, but also lets be creative and talk about what we CAN do to stop them, instead of bitching about it.

    -o

  134. Re:The FTC address is uce@ftc.gov. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry - my bad...
    uce@ftc.gov is the right address

  135. Re:Spammers?John Poindexter is getting a taste too by vsprintf · · Score: 2

    If I understand your comment, you proved my point. California regulated a lot of companies out of business in the name of environmental goodness (green). California is loudly pro-environment but expects all the other states to provide it with power and water.

  136. Re:Spammers?John Poindexter is getting a taste too by vsprintf · · Score: 2

    Oh, wait. That was a joke, wasn't it?

  137. IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WE KILL SPAMMERS!

  138. Re:Spammers?John Poindexter is getting a taste too by Peahippo · · Score: 2

    This leads to another of my predictions which I've advocated (yes, I mean "I support enthusiastically the idea of") for years: the water wars out in the American West.

    There are just too many urban areas in too arid of climates. They draw so heavily on available water that rivers fail to reach the sea and aquifiers drain so much that the land sinks. Their appetite for water (and to be fair, that of farmers and industries) is simply too high. So they must use force in some respect to get more water.

    I live near a Great Lake, and have seen more than enough attempts to get some of that water out West. If we let them, California alone would pipe out Lake Erie until the lake became a river.

    As time goes on, the demand will just get worse, and there must be instances of crisis when a drought hits. The Californians will indeed bend the national Congress over their knee and spank them until they pass a law making Midwestern states dig the Great Lake pipeline. And then the shooting will start in ernest. (After all, there's no way to secure a pipeline; a little dynamite can always be brought into the argument, making CA's need and authorization a moot point.)

    --
    [also misbehaves on Kuro5hin as Peahippo]
  139. junk mail? Common- do our worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    More bad stuff:

    Rent a storage locker somewhere with Ralkskeys info. Fill with illegal/toxic substances.

    Send him child porn from overseas.

    Example: Dear Mr Ralkskey,
    We're sorry, but the movie Willy and his Horny Daddyis not currently available. We're very sorry for the inconveniance, so here are a couple of movies about little boys in golden showers, and also, about small girls with large dogs. We hope you enjoy them. We're in the process right now of making a new movie about Little Tommy, his 11 year old sister, 30 year old mother, and her 65 year old girlfriend. We'll inform you as soon it is ready. Once again, we're sorry for the inconveniance.

    Sincerly,
    Pete Peadophile

    Manufacture (or steal from his trash) a bunch of junkmail addressed to him. Then mix it in with some other household trash and dump it along a highway or in a protected area like a watershed.

    Don't think he'd getting enough attention? Get a line mans telephone and call every single carpenter, service, caterer, etc to his house at the SAME time. Order about 200 pizzas as well. Then call the news media, police and fire department at the last minute (this part from a pay phone). Should be funny as hell.

    send letters in his name to every church and missionary service you can think of, confessing his various sins. (see above).

    for more ideas, see books by George Hayduke. I don't think I have to tell you that carrying out most or all of this is highly illegal, and shouldn't be done. This post is just for humor and karma whoring purposes.

  140. Re:Unsolicted bulk mail prohibited; spammers will by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "[Connected]
    220-mtain01 -- Server ESMTP ("Comcast Messaging System")
    220 Unsolicted bulk mail prohibited; spammers will be prosecuted"

    Oh the irony :-)

  141. here's an idea to get him shut down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hijack his machine and send out Al-Qaeda spam.
    That'll get him shut down in a hurry. :-)

  142. bite me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    West Bloomfield - Pizza Hut - Phone: 248-8516230

  143. Is there a web site with names and addresses by RDPIII · · Score: 1

    of well-known spammers? Like an entire list of snail-mail addresses that someone has harvested? Just curious.

    --
    Marklar: marklar
  144. That's great!!! by ToasterTester · · Score: 2

    I wish I could forward the couple hundred pieces of spam I get a day to this guy. Spammers should have to pay to use the internet then take the money to help maintain the internet infrastructure. Truckers and other commericial vehicles have to pay extra fees for using the interstate system of highways to run their business. I don't see have spammers are any different using the internet for business.

    I should be able to charge spammers for the percent of my bandwitdh they are using that I have to pay for. I hate junk snail mail, but at least they have to pay postage, that in long run helps pay for running the post office system.

  145. Balkanization by rawshark · · Score: 1

    To dimly predict, it might occur that the CA legislature votes for an "assurance bond" for people moving into CA. To live there, you must present $10000 in cash or a bond good for same to local authorities.

    Article I, section 7, "[Congress shall have the power] To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes." If memory serves me, inconveniences in commerce was one of the reasons the United States was formed.

    Balkanization may happen, but that law {w,sh}ould be struck down very quickly.

    1. Re:Balkanization by Peahippo · · Score: 2

      I recognize your argument, but it seems to me that there are two problems with it.

      Firstly, once Balkanization occurs, legal remedies won't exist. Hell, this happens now. Ohio's Supreme Court just ruled for the third time about the unconstitutionality of the way public schools are funded. Why 3 times? There are other reasons, but I must point out the attitude that the Governor and leading legislators expressed when they dismissed the ruling. How can a governor and legislators just ignore their own state 's Supreme Court? Easily ... they just do it, and the rest of us do nothing about it. So I have no confidence in the application of legal remedies to anything CA might do directly to enforce a virtual wall along their borders.

      Secondly, commerce is one thing, and residency is another. Now, if the SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) has definitively ruled on the issue and has linked commerce and residency, then I'd agree more with your point. But to my knowledge they haven't ... thus, your case seems further weakened.

      IANAL, BISHBO (but I should have been one)

      P.S. Have you considered that perhaps vastly increased housnig prices is CA's way of making people post an assurance bond? Just speculating freely.

      --
      [also misbehaves on Kuro5hin as Peahippo]
    2. Re:Balkanization by Number_5 · · Score: 1

      Actually it already has been tried and was indeed found unconstitutional. Back in the '30s, during The Great Depression, California tried to limit who could move to the state. Agricultural workers from the dust bowl states were moving in. Their laws were appealed and overturned. Rent The Grapes of Wrath with Henry Fonda to get a picture (or read the book).

  146. Personally I use cloudmarks spamnet by AbRASiON · · Score: 0

    It's working fairly well @ the moment and has done for months.

    Sure I need to use Outlook rather than OE, but the calendar I found useful anyhow.
    (yes I know some of you think Outlook is evil, as well as Windows, but if a SMART user uses it, virus problems = nil and I'm not a linux man, sorry - sue me)

    Problem with spamnet seems to be a few blocked thins which SHOULDN'T be blocked (dilbert mailout for one!)

    Besides that though, it's nailing about 70% of my spam for me, which makes the job much easier - a damn good idea

    www.cloudmark.com

  147. Don't stop now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep the pressure up. Somebody go here and make sure he gets a *real* treat.

    I tell you, some people really know how to shoot themselves in the foot. I'm glad he's getting snail-spammed. :)

  148. How about a physical protest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anybody in the area want to march back in front of his house carrying signs?

  149. John Poindexter is getting a full three courses by leonbrooks · · Score: 3, Informative

    Meta-discussion here. Note the signatures of Gorge Bush and Oliver White displayed prominently at top right.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  150. To /. Readers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How hard can it be to read the FAQ?

  151. There must be a way to automate this! by leonbrooks · · Score: 3, Informative

    Send a bounce to all of the addresses listed, if it succeeds, add the email address to a list, poison a few random fake blogs with it, and auto-subscribe it to every web site with a form on it that you've found from spidering links in spam. Fight spam with spam, excellent idea! Just sending the bounce will make the bouncing address a spam target, so after a while you wouldn't even need user intervention, since most of the weird form field questions would have been answered and your addresses would really be out there. Your spam-harvesting spammer introduction agency would have hit critical mass. (-:

    As a side issue, you could listen for worms and email viruses, sending the attacking machines a gratis copy of the Debian installer, with a suitably educated, er, bootloader. (-:

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  152. Invoices work better by leonbrooks · · Score: 3, Funny
    Ihave a line ton the bottom of my corporate website which says:
    If you would like us to read email for USD$1000 per page, payable in advance, send it here.

    `here' is a unique, randomly-generated email link like this one: `Bill-Me-USD1000-and-Read-This.-1243363468-3707143 8@$COMPANY' and `payable' is a link to a page describing terms:

    Email-Perusal payments!

    Perusal of enquiries with regard to payment for standard perusals is carried out at no charge, unless mention of solicitors, lawyers, lawsuits or court is made in the enquiry, at which point our standard perusal fee of USD$1000.00 per email, payable in advance, applies.

    If you have an enquiry which is not covered by the information on this page, we reserve the right to quote portions of your enquiry on this page to aid in providing information to users of our services.

    We have the following payment methods available:

    PayPal direct

    Click this button and follow instructions to pre-pay an email perusal, and paste your unique email address into the reference field:

    Include your credit card details in the email

    Since perusal is flat-rate per email, adding information to an email incurs no additional fees. Remember to include the following details:

    Your name
    Your postal address, if you require an airmailed receipt
    Your normal email address, if you require an email receipt
    Your reference (a unique email address from this site or our invoice number)
    Type of card (Visa, MasterCard, Amex)
    Full card number, and confirmation number if any
    Full expiry date as shown on the card

    Since email is unencrypted, we recommend that you use the following option in preference. There is no additional processing fee for successful payments using these methods.

    Send your card details using a secure form

    Name of purchaser:
    Postal address if printed receipt required:
    Email if emailed receipt required:
    Reference email or invoice number:
    Amount (USD$1000 per email):
    Card type:
    VisaMasterCardAmerican Express
    Full card number:
    Confirmation number, if available:
    Expiry date as it appears on card:
    Click when done to send:

    Inexact Payment Values

    Where the amount undergoes a currency conversion, the value actually drawn from the credit card may differ slightly from the amount specified. $COMPANY endeavours to predict financial trends where possible so that any variation results in a lower fee charged rather than a higher, but cannot warrant that this is will always be so in practice as currency value variations are not within $COMPANY's control.

    Security Policy

    Credit card details are discarded after payment has been executed. This website is hosted on a secure and regularly updated Linux-base webserver, which in the course of normal operation is a reasonably solid gurantee of the security of information passing through it. However, $COMPANY does not warrant the security of information submitted to any on-line service, and information submitted here is provided at the submitter's risk.

    Thank you for your custom.

    Never once had a second piece of spam to those addresses, and that domain's got the least spam of any in my possession. (-:

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  153. So... by leonbrooks · · Score: 2

    ...were you representing the DA's office and asking them about Ralsky's drug charges or checking to see whether the lawyers were on drugs because they represent him?

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  154. PICS OF THE RALSKY HOME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Looks a bit like Bates Motel if u ask me.
    http://2mbit.com/egg/gallery/

  155. Re:Spammers?John Poindexter is getting a taste too by Courageous · · Score: 2

    No, I don't think you get it. Green Mountain Power was an alternative clean power company. California's regulatory climate put the only accessible environmentally conscious power company available in southern california out of the direct power business. Wierd, eh?

    C//

  156. Re:Liberalisation vs green by g.a.g · · Score: 1

    Actually, one large problem with the "liberalisation" California style was that they also regulated themselves out of a market based approach, basically regulating themselves out of the power saving alternative. Had the moon prices been allowed to be handed down to the consumers, the spirit of free enterprise could have taken hold to try to consume less electricity (consumers and industry alike).

    Just my c2.

    --
    Hurricane Application Group, Dept of Meteorology Control, Ministry of Proactive Defense
  157. Re:Next time get back out and photograph the follo by Eggplant62 · · Score: 2

    What, and get slapped with a stalking charge if I'm caught once again? Nah, I have other operatives who can do that dirty work for me.

  158. SpamBouncer by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    http://www.spambouncer.org/ - Procmail-based, also includes this feature. Also easy to rip out the bounce subroutine and integrated it with your own recipes if you wish, as I have.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  159. Go door-to-door by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    If his neighbors don't know who he is and what he does for a living, calmly educate them as to wheir the shit in their mailbox is coming from.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  160. DMV records by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    It's obvious that he used your license plate to get your name and address from DMV records.

    I suggest you do something similar - Find out if Ralsky owns a black Jaguar.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  161. balance by theFlux · · Score: 1

    Now if I could just manage the same with telemarketers, the universe would be in balance.

  162. Sign him up for Grad School! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    15 years ago in college 2 friends of mine sent in like 200 cards they collected from recruitment posters around their college campus. They requested information about graduate programs in all kinds of different stuff with a 3rd guy's name and address.

    That dude's roommates called them up later and bitched that they got 750 pieces of mail in the first few weeks, and it didn't stop for months!!!

    Somebody here has to be on a campus and have time to pick up some of those reply cards . . . .

  163. latest news from the inside: tax time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well I can't say that I'm a defector, but I can suggest to all that as an ex-friend of his, he should have some, let's say, miscalculations on his income statements.. It would be just too obvious for me to call the IRS though, seeing as he could find out it was me.

  164. the spammer harassment project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was thinking about how painstaking it was for me to send Al investor information packets from every publically traded company website I could think of. I was feeling rather hopeless when I realized I sent him a ton of kits to his old address. I sure hope he has mail temporarily forwarded to his new house, or whoever lives there now will be so kind as to tell the nice postal carrier to send it to the new address. So I got around to thinking further.. If all of this is what it takes to harass Al, it might be even better if it were an automated process, as a program that would submit the information in the background too all of those websites, which is normally a simple 1 page form. Some websites use slightly different input identifyers but at one point, every website I visited, I was able to use autocomplete to speed the whole thing up; copy & paste just wasn't fast enough. some other thoughts.. * piss on his front door * get a big ol' pile of manuer, and put it all up near the front door. might need a uhaul to do this, but being careful to remove any license plates and hiding any thing that could identify the vehicles (and it would be suggested to use ski masks or something to obscure your face) The flys, the smell, the attractiveness of his house. oh joy. BTW Alan's middle name is MURRAY, if anyone needs that.

  165. so i heard ralsky just got long distance service. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ralsky went to www.msnld.com and signed up for long distance services. i hope he remembered to use his new phone number. and i hope hes not actually saving money with them.. hrm.

  166. KILL ALL SPAMMERS by Darth+TaC · · Score: 1

    I HATE spam, i don't want to know. If i wanted porn i'd go looking for it if i wanted to gamble i go to the bookmakers. These low-life, good-4-nothing spamming slime should be BANNED from the internet. All they are doing is pissing us all off and cloging servere with unwanted crap, TAKE THE HINT SPAMMERS, STOP AND STOP NOW!!!!

  167. Re:Spammers?John Poindexter is getting a taste too by vsprintf · · Score: 2

    Green Mountain Power in SoCal? When was this? I left in '91, when the handwriting was on the wall. I think I was current with the issues (especially concerning the SCAQMD), but I don't recall that name.

  168. Re:Spammers?John Poindexter is getting a taste too by Courageous · · Score: 2

    I don't know when they started providing. They ended during the Power Crisis. Think that was early 2001, maybe. Or late 2000. I had them for a year or two. Funny part was, I couldn't get our office "environmental nut" to get them. The power cost about the same, but it was _cleaner_. No go. Friggin' hypocrit.

    C//

  169. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    The primary cause of failure in electrical appliances is an expired
    warranty. Often, you can get an appliance running again simply by changing
    the warranty expiration date with a 15/64-inch felt-tipped marker.
    -- Dave Barry, "The Taming of the Screw"

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...