Slashdot Mirror


The New Face of Global Competition

Valluvan writes "Here is an article in Fast Company on "The New Face of Global Competition". The article is focused on Wipro, a big IT company in India, but applies to many other companies in India that have been highly successful. A long article with some stupid errors like saying developers code with UML, but brings out the business facts well enough."

392 comments

  1. Coding with UML by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...stupid errors like saying developers code with UML Hey, I code with UML -- just like I code with HTTP and WAP.

    1. Re:Coding with UML by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

      Next thing they'll claim that developers are capable of writing documentation and test cases... the crazy deluded journalists!

    2. Re:Coding with UML by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I code with my fingers. Sometimes my brain tells them what to do.

  2. There's Nothing New Under the Sun by signifying+nothing · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Although this is in industries close to Slashdotters' hearts, there is nothing particularly new here. The textiles industry, which was one of the very first high-tech industries, largely left the developed world a long time ago.

    Other industries will follow as the necessary skills and infrastructure become more wide-spread.

    The rich world will continue to specialise in those industries which require the latest cutting edge infrastructure and skills, and slowly discard the rest.

    1. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The textiles industry, which was one of the very first high-tech industries, largely left the developed world a long time ago.

      I think the point here, though, is not so much that coding is leaving the "Developed" world to go to some sweatshops in India, but rather that Bangalore has become a sort of First world island: They have the infrastructure and the education, so why couldn't they compete? There is a huge danger in all of these articles, though: The United States (I'm personally a Canadian, and I laugh a bit because in some ways Canada is a mini India: We've always attracted this sort of work because of our low dollar. Indeed when this article claimed that software development in India was 40% less than the US...well that actually puts it right on par with Canada then. I think we need to advertise our sweatshops more!) could truly fall behind not because India has shot ahead (and VB type coding that they're doing now is NOT shooting ahead despite this absurd article), but rather because everyone stops going into computer science because of articles like this. Already I've seen a lot of bright minds leave computer science for "management" pathed careers, all because they've bought into the notion that the field is dead here. Of course it isn't, and this article certainly doesn't forbode any new threat that didn't already exist, and of course the mad rush to India will cease, costs will equalize, and then they'll be consumers of the big worldwide information field.

      Ironic, though: It'll be interesting to see what happens when developer pay skyrockets as new shops are set up.

    2. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by feed_those_kitties · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The rich world will continue to specialise in those industries which require the latest cutting edge infrastructure and skills, and slowly discard the rest.

      And by doing so, the "rich world" will eventually give away so much work that they will be poor.

      Think about it - if the United States economy continues to send good-paying jobs overseas, what's left for the people in the U.S.? Yes, some "rich" people will get even richer, but a LOT of us will get poorer. Is that what we want?

      I'm a developer with over 20 years experience. Cobol, SQL, VB, C, Java, HTML, UML, XML - I can do them all pretty well. My old company fired me after nine years claiming I couldn't do my job. Why? Because they can send my job to India and find someone with 2 years of experience who will work for $6 an hour...

      Multiply that by the number of people who earn a living here in the U.S. by writing code, and where does that leave us? Claiming to be a 'Java developer' because we write some code at home, while earning a living working fast-food?

      Anyone looking for a skilled developer?

    3. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by JanneM · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, yes and no.

      The specific sector (in this case IT) that is being squeezed certainly loses some in competition. For the economy as a whole, though, the money freed by getting cheaper IT solutions won't be stuffed into mattresses, but will enable more investment in other sectors (including up and coming areas). The economy as a whole doesn't get poorer; depending on the situation it may get richer at a somewhat slower pace.

      Meanwhile, the poor countries get a _lot_ wealthier; each transferred unit of fund is a far larger fraction of total wealth in the poorer country receiving the payment than it is in the richer country paying it. The net result is that the difference in wealth between the countries are asymptotically diminishing - and at the same time, both the wealthier economy and the world economy increases its wealth.

      Yes, it sucks to be a 'line programmer' or general consultant in our industry right now. It sucked to be a textile worker in europe or north america for most of the twentieth century, it sucked (and still sucks) to be a high-volume parts supplier to major manufacturing corporations. One day, it will suck to be a human bioengineer or nanotech designer.

      However, if you have specialized skills, or work for a niche or speciality company, things are different. Being a cloth designer or speciality weaver does not suck. Being a nimble small-volume and/or speciality parts integrated designer and manufacturer is good eating. And being a highly skilled specialist (VLSI designer, for example) in our industry is still viable and likely to remain so.

      Churning out app code or designing yet another business database bridge app is the equivalent to sowing slacks for off-the-rack or molding ten million stereo volume control knobs. They are the equivalent of sowing Nike's. Those jobs will leave - and will leave India as well as even more low-cost countries develop the population skills and infrastructure to take them.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    4. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by sql*kitten · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And by doing so, the "rich world" will eventually give away so much work that they will be poor.

      Historically, that's a fallacy. How many farmers are there in the US now as a percentage of the population compared to a century ago? Is the country richer or poorer now? Standards of living have gone up over the last 50 years, despite the auto industry moving overseas. Did you know that textiles was once a high-tech industry, and textile manufacturing technology was a jealously guarded secret? Where are all the textile workers now, and is the country richer or poorer since they left?

      Multiply that by the number of people who earn a living here in the U.S. by writing code, and where does that leave us?

      What about all the people who earned a living cleaning out stables? The country is wealthier now that those people's jobs were obsoleted by the car - and funnily, there weren't hordes of unemployed stablehands, they just went to do something else.

    5. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are still the largest producer of food in the world. Your analogy targets the lower class, never in history have we threatened the upper class. It will not only destroy innovation in this nation, it will breed a hatred for other nations such as India; similiar to Germany during it's pre WWII depression. Even Rome came to an end.

    6. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by enjo13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Touching... really.

      You could read up on economics while you work at Burger King, as a matter of fact I would reccomend it. While it sounds cruel, 'developed' nations actually benefit from this kind of displacement in many ways. Experience has shown that 'shipping jobs overseas' actually CREATES more jobs here at home. It allows the developed nations to develop a competitive advantage in areas that require the education and high-skill manpower that a nation like the U.S. has.

      Software development isn't an incredibly difficult skill.. in particular the types of software development that is being shipped overseas. I have made it a strong point to become an expert in system architecture and design, and that has kept me very comfortably employed no matter the economic conditions. In economic terms, I have given myself a strong competitive advantage over low-skill programmers by becoming an expert in a high-skill area of software engineering.

      It's time that we all realize that programming is not difficult. People are willing to work for $6 an hour to do it simply because a LOT of people have learned how to do it well. Yet their remain certain parts of the development process that are extremely difficult to master. Types of projects that require expertise above and beyond anything the low-skill 'labor programmer' can do. If you have those skills, then you will have no trouble finding gainful employment no matter what the economic conditions are.

      --
      Turn s60 photos into awesome videos with mScrapbook for all S60 3rd edition phones!
    7. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by feed_those_kitties · · Score: 1
      For the economy as a whole, though, the money freed by getting cheaper IT solutions won't be stuffed into mattresses, but will enable more investment in other sectors (including up and coming areas).

      I disagree. The money is not being "saved", it is being removed from the U.S. economy.

      Think about it: the dollar I spend on a soft-drink at my local convenience store gets paid to a worker of that store. They spend it on something else. That place spends it on something else, and so on, and so on. But if I take that dollar and send it overseas, it's GONE from my local economy.

      By continuing to send more and more money overseas, that money isn't "saved", it's removed from the economy.

      Long-winded hypothetical situation. Small island, inhabited by lets say 100 people. Has a fixed amount of money, they use it for bartering goods and services. One islander discovers that he can get a good cheaper from another island, so starts bartering with that island instead. What does his island get? A 'good' or 'service', sure -- but the money is GONE. If that continues, eventually his island will have no money left.

      Here's my economic lesson for today: No one is "making" money. Money isn't "made", it is only transferred. The only way to 'make' money is to have someone else give you some of their's. If that person doesn't have any money, you can't make any money from them.

      If U.S. companies continue to send more money overseas than we receive from overseas ("Trade Deficit", anyone?) - in the long term the U.S. economy will go through a depression that will make the 1930's look like a bad day at the office.

      So, you contine to "save" money, and I'll continue to do my best to keep my money in my local economy. That way, it has a chance to eventually come back to me!

    8. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by milo_Gwalthny · · Score: 1

      Perhaps we should shoot all the Buffalo so the Indians will have nothing to eat. That will teach them to compete with us.

      --
      Milo
    9. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 4, Insightful
      And by doing so, the "rich world" will eventually give away so much work that they will be poor.

      As a professional software engineer in the US, I sympathize. I certainly want the US to keep all of its software development in the US. But it's worth keeping in mind that the cheaper software engineers in other countries want those jobs just as badly as we do. While I'm certainly against exporting jobs to countries were the employees will be threatened, abused, and subjected to inhuman working conditions, my understanding is that software engineers in say, India, enjoy very good working conditions by their standards. Also, these low wage industries have been the foundation for growth for a number of countries in Asia, creating many jobs and generally increasing the technological level of the countries, changing them from "a cheap place to get labor" to "high tech competitors." So my selfish side says, "We should keep all programming jobs in the US", but I have to balance it against "Why should my job opportunities be given more weight than the job opportunities of people in other countries."

    10. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by milo_Gwalthny · · Score: 1

      I apologize, that was uncalled for, and very insensitive, even for sarcasm. No more posting today.

      --
      Milo
    11. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by gorilla · · Score: 1

      The numbers of farmers have gone down because agriculture has changed from a labour intensive industry to a highly mechanized industry. This allows a much smaller numerically industry to be equally good, or better, at generating money for the economey.

    12. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by budalite · · Score: 1

      1. Yeah. Uncle Sam . Good money, usually interesting work.
      2. Leave the attitude home. No one owes you anything.
      Good Luck.

    13. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by dubl-u · · Score: 1
      Other industries will follow as the necessary skills and infrastructure become more wide-spread.

      Many will, but I don't think this one need go.

      To keep development work here, we must exploit the one advantage we have over people 10,000 miles away: we're closer. Sure, that sounds too simple. But hear me out.

      The traditional dominant development process, the Waterfall, assumes that you can put every important fact about a piece of software into a requirements document. That document is then turned over to the geeks, who could be kept in a sealed room, for construction. N months later, perfect software comes out.

      We all know this is bunk. And not just from practical experience; if the requirements document really had all the needed information, then you could just write a requirements document compiler and dispense with the programmers completely. But it's the bunk that allows outsourced development companies to work. Not just because it allows them to pretend a development center on the other side of the planet is just as good. Even worse, because we believe this bunk, their development centers are just as good as keeping the engineers in the building (or city, or state) next door, as is common practice here.
      So what should we do instead? We should pick development methods that take advantage of the highest-bandwidth, lowest-latency communication available to us: physical presence. If we put the engineers in the same room as the domain experts and the product managers, then we can build software more quickly and more efficiently than before.

      But we get more than that. If you put everybody together, then you get unmatched ability to respond to change, change in the market, in your customer needs, in your competitor's products. A bunch of people in a room can turn on a dime compared with the difficulty of changing specs, changing contracts, and updating people who are asleep when you are awake. Even better, you can create change, forcing your competitors to try to keep pace with you.

      So for those interested in keeping at least a few develoment jobs in the US, check out the book Agile Software Development Ecosystems (prices). Or look at one of the many Agile methods directly:
      And for the record, I think world trade is great. If somebody in India can really do my job for 1/10th as much; then I should find something new to do, something that provides matchable value to my clients.
    14. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by JanneM · · Score: 1

      Actually the idea that the amount of wealth is fixed is faulty. Take a simple example:

      I make widgets. They cost me $10 each to make. I thus exchange $10 in cash for an equivalent value in a widget. Now, I sell the widget to you. I charge $12, which you feel is perfectly all right as it saves you the hassle of building and operating your own widget factory. Now, suddenly, the widget that had an exchange value of $10 has a value of $12. $2 has been 'created'.

      Of course, a limitation on this is the amount of paper notes and coins with numbers on it. Had the amount of money (money is a subset of wealth only) been fixed we'd get a cash crunch. People would not be able to buy widgets, the market would drop and the economy would slow (=the turnover of stuff would slow).

      So, a trusted entity in charge of those bills print more. The trick is to add money at a rate that matches the actual increase in wealth; too little and you will get deflation (as the value of stuff goes down due to insufficient money to trade them with), too much and the value of that money will lessen due to the oversupply and you get inflation.

      Today, of course, this is not regulated by printing bills, but by setting the lending rate for banks, as credit works the same as money for the purpose of regulating money supply.

      Money is only transferred, yes, but _wealth_ is made.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    15. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > Here's my economic lesson for today: No one is "making" money. Money isn't "made", it is only transferred. The only way to 'make' money is to have someone else give you some of their's. If that person doesn't have any money, you can't make any money from them.

      /me munches on popcorn and giggles as Alan Greenspan and the rest of the Federal Reserve Board of Governers whacks you across the head with a big thick book of bank charters :)

    16. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you say 'funnily'?

    17. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by PD · · Score: 1

      It was shown a long time ago that your ideas are faulty. In a nutshell, what you are not considering is that by retaining people as unskilled workers you are limiting their potential. When you send the unskilled jobs out of the country, you benefit from the liberated potential of a human being. And the country receiving the unskilled job also benefits.

    18. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm, because you're American, and should be more concerned about your own country men than those of another nation, regardless of how poor they seem.

    19. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by CaptainCap · · Score: 1

      Stupid ... really.

      So what will be the plan for developing expertise above and beyond anything the low-skill 'labor programmer' can do? I'm sure it will use a lot of terminology in 'quotes' but what else is involved?

      - Go to college
      - Low-skill jobs are overseas, so ... ?
      - Burger King
      - Burger King
      - ... ?
      - Reach expertise level!!!

      Going to use the "everyone can get a government job" gambit here?

    20. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i don't think the people who go to college are having trouble finding jobs. it is the people who go to "college" that are. see what i mean?

    21. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by Khalid · · Score: 1

      No, it dosen't work this way ! because most of this money will be recycled in the US economy to buy good India doesn't and can't produce and they are many of them, high tech goods for instance. I am pretty sure India has a negative economic balance with the US. The money which goes back to the US creates american, jobs, but alas not as programers jobs as tehose that have been lost, but probably other kind of jobs.

    22. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "And by doing so, the "rich world" will eventually give away so much work that they will be poor."

      How will outsourcing what is essentially a manufacturing industry to other parts of the world seriously hurt a services-based economy like the US?

    23. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

      Nice as that sounds, I fail to see how taking a two-thirds drop in my salary has liberated me from anything except the dreadful chore of actually being able to afford the odd luxury or 2.

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
    24. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by PD · · Score: 1

      False attribution. The drop in your salary has nothing to do with computer jobs sent overseas.

    25. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      I am pretty sure India has a negative economic balance with the US.

      You are way misinformed. In 2000, there was a seven billion dollar trade deficit (in India's favor). Exports from the United states were $3.7 billion, while imports from India were $10.7 billion.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    26. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      It does when it's your job that's sent to India.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    27. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could end up like the Working Poor recently shown on "48 Hours", resorting to food banks when your minimum wage job gets cut!

    28. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      How many farmers are there in the US now as a percentage of the population compared to a century ago?

      That's a pretty poor comparison. How many farmers shut down the business because it was cheaper to import the same products from another country? We're more likely to import stuff that doesn't grow very well in this country. A better way of looking at it: how much wheat and corn (maize) do we import?

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    29. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like a fucking management apologist. The manager's toady that clucks his tongue as formerly gainfully employed people are led into the lobby so they can be bodily thrown into the street.

      If software development isn't an incredibly difficult skill, why is there so much shitty software?

      People are willing to work for $6 an hour because they don't have to shovel out four figures a month for a mortgage payment, asshole.

      As for "have no trouble finding gainful employment," bullshit. As long as there are people like you in the employment process, good people will continue to be FUCKED OUT OF THEIR CAREERS.

      Want to fuck over a society? Start by making it impossible for people to make a living.

    30. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by briaman · · Score: 1
      Bright minds leave computer science for management pathed careers largely because they tend to offer better pay and benefits. Very few people make it to the top by going into computer science, but an MA in Business Studies means that you can get a job for a company that you know nothing about in an industry that you know nothing about managing staff who perform roles that you know nothing about.

      Obviously, someone recruited under these circumstances is going to suffer from a serious loss of face if they admit their lack of knowledge, so many of these managers cover their ignorance by restructuring the department and changing the way that operations are performed using the confusion to cover their own incompetence. Meanwhile they spend time looking for a new job and move on before the consequences of their mismanagement catch up with them. A new MA Business Studies graduate is then recruited who is equally clueless and the whole pantomime begins again.

      Companies like Wipro are thriving largely because they are led by innovative and energetic technically minded people who know their business. All successful first generation startups have this in common. As the company ages the higher echelons loose contact with the people at the sharp end of the business and so the company begins to stagnate. By the third and fourth generation of management very little that is said by staff reaches the dizzy heights of the bosses and more of the companys efforts are focussed on it's image than are focussed on it's product. It then becomes inevitable that a new, well led startup will appear to be moving quickly by comparison.

      These new and innovative startups appear everywhere, not just in the Tiger economies. However, two key differences exist between western markets and the markets of the east. The first is that many of the mega-corps are located in the west. This means that even a moderately successful eastern company stands out from the crowd while equally successful western companies languish in obscurity. The second difference is that companies in the west suffer more severe impediments to their progress in the form of hard-ball tactics by the encumbant market leaders. These come in the form of legal blocks, onerous contracts, and numerous other tactics right up to buying the new competitor out.

      It only stands to reason that the current western dominance - which is wholey economic and entirely due to past innovation and former energetic leadership - is going to decline and be replaced by similar traits elsewhere.

      If you want something to blame - dont blame the sweatshops. It's our own complacency that's at fault.

      --

      ==========
      Error in module creativity.dll : Unable to create witty comment.
      Abort / Retry / Ignore ?

    31. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by bheer · · Score: 1

      > And by doing so, the "rich world" will eventually give away so much work that they will be poor.

      No, the smarter ones in the richer nations will go to college, and learn how to make The Next Big Thing. Its the dumb ones that'll go to burger king.

      It amazes me how many /.-ers think programming is some kind of pinnacle of human evolution and achievement. How many programmers did you see last time you saw Star Trek?

      In your specific case (20 years experience), I'd say your experience alone will see you through. There *is* a market for good, experienced people -- see what the market wants! Chances are, the Indian company who got your last job could use a good consultant for code quality (the code quality of most Indian companies suck, for instance, although Wipro -- mentioned in the article -- is one of the better ones)

    32. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      If software development isn't an incredibly difficult skill, why is there so much shitty software?

      Fitting immediate requirements is not hard. What is hard is making the software be maintenance-friendly.

      But I guess if the maintenance can be done for $2/hour, perhaps that does not matter much either.

    33. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the geeks who spend their time learning computers were so bright, theyd've quit coding earlier and practiced football, spent more time on grooming, gotten a girlfriend, taken a degree in English or Psychology, gotten their MBA right away, and been the boss of the programmer turned manager, with higher pay and a better chance at promotion.

      Or maybe they go into engineering for different reasons. Maybe because being bright makes them want to try something more challenging. Or maybe because genetics (or environment) conspired to force them to spend their time on more intellectual pursuits.

    34. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by Monkeyfarmer · · Score: 1

      >>How many farmers shut down the business because it was cheaper to import the same products from another country?

      This shows your complete ignorance...

      Michigan apple producers are getting killed by apples from places like China. That's right... China.

      California is getting killed in citrus, etc. etc. etc.

    35. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Anyone looking for a skilled developer?

      Yup. Are you available to move to India?

    36. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That balance only shows the dollars. For every $35/hour programmer that was replace by an Indian programmer working at $6/hour, an American company made $29/hour per programmer *profit* on their products.

    37. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because someone has to have the money to pay for it when you ask "Do you want fries with that?"

    38. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yay RUP!

    39. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      Michigan apple producers are getting killed by apples from places like China. That's right... China.

      I've never seen a single apple, orange or grapefruit in any of my local supermarkets from China. They're all from either Florida or California. Are you sure they're getting killed in the "home" market? Or are they having trouble with exports?

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    40. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder why doesn't microsoft outsource all its work to India and sell WinXP at $15 :)

    41. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by etcpasswd · · Score: 1

      Looking at the big picture, who's making more money - Nike or the sweatshops in the thirdworld countries?

    42. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are an idiot.

      What do you think foreign countries do with U.S. dollars? Do you think they're just going to stuff them under a mattress, or keep them in a vault and roll around in them?

      The whole point of getting money is so you can spend it. Eventually, every single U.S. dollar they get from selling us stuff, they will spend, one way or another. And where will they spend it? In which country is the U.S. dollar legal tender? Think about it, take your time.

    43. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      No, the smarter ones in the richer nations will go to college, and learn how to make The Next Big Thing. Its the dumb ones that'll go to burger king.

      There won't be "Next Big Thing", just like there never was. There were discoveries and achievements in engineering that were never known by anyone but a small group of people, and only then vultures were swarming all over them. But they never were "next" -- until the moment they were done no one took them seriously. Of course, punduits later claimed that they foreseen it before, but those were just lucky punduits that happened to be right as opposed to equally stupid punduits that proclaimed the imminent arrival of something else, only to be promptly forgotten. So there is no "Next Big Thing", there are only "Currently Popular Fads".

      And it wouldn't be such a problem if vultures weren't getting better and better at reacting. It's like measuring the shoreline length and discovering that it's a fractal -- when all vultures are slow they more or less chase the overall progress and get some prey along the way. But some vultures get smarter and follow progress faster and more precisely. Then the whole crowd is running following all the little bays... then the "leaders" are getting even faster, run around every rock, into every cave... in the end the direction of the crowd is totally uniform and absolutely unrelated to the actual big picture, they are ready to support anything, and nothing at all, they are impatient and ultimately remain hungry because prey is nowhere close to the direction where they are flying. If only those new vultures abandoned the speed they would certainly find something, but they are more concerned about not allowing a faster competitor to get their piece before them.

      And this is why they remain hungry.

      Oh, BTW, biotech is not any better than dotcoms. Am I the lucky punduit here by any chance?

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    44. Re:There's Nothing New Under the Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You neglect one thing in your analysis of
      trade and our trade deficit--the fact that
      nations have different currencies. Using
      lets say a hypothetical trade between India
      and the United States, we know the US currency
      is the dollar and the Indian currency is the
      rupee. Now lets say that the firms located
      in the US can make a good called the widget for $15
      and firms located in India can make widgets for
      $5. Now lets say trade is opened with India. Seeing an opportunity, a company starts to import things from India. But, the company has no rupees and can't get them because there has no been no trade. So, he must pay the Indian exporter in dollars rather than in rupees. But, the exporter can't buy dinner with dollars, the exporter needs rupees. So he goes to the Bank of India and gets them to trade him rupees for dollars. Now there is an exchange rate. We can imagine a few other transactions like these occur with the India gaining more dollars. Now lets assume some Indians want cars, American cars and so they go to an importer. The importer can't pay for an American car with rupees, he needs dollars. So he goes to the bank, which now has a large reserve of dollars, and trades rupees for dollars. Note if trade were stopped eventually all these dollars would be spent, when there is a trade surplus it just means for India dollars are coming in faster than they are being spent, all dollars are spent.

  3. Creative Labs by Anonymous+Hack · · Score: 4, Interesting

    To me the first "surprise" success that came out of Asia was Creative Labs (of SoundBlaster fame). I mean, sure, we all know Yamaha and Fuji and the rest, but Creative Labs was just a soundcard manufacter... Now their products run the gamut from digital cameras to MP3 players... and they own the two remaining American professional synthesizer companies - Ensoniq and E-mu. They have research labs in the States and "back home"... Mind-boggling, really.

    --
    I got a sig so you would remember me.
    1. Re:Creative Labs by ChrisWong · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They are from Singapore, which these days is practically a first-world nation. Creative Labs is a bit of an aberration, though, in that its management is quite a bit more aggressive and, well, creative than that of most companies from that part of the world.

    2. Re:Creative Labs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC (too lazy too look up) Singapore reached first-world-nation development indices three years ago. Most of singapore is actually better maintained than most of Europe (of course, much smaller place, yadda yadda)

    3. Re:Creative Labs by charnov · · Score: 1

      Remember Creative got to that point not by innovation, but by litigation. They sued Aureal (their main competitor), a US company, into bankruptcy and then purchased their IP assets (see Audigy 1&2). Linkage

      --
      [RIAA] says its concern is artists. That's true, in just the sense that a cattle rancher is concerned about its cattle.
    4. Re:Creative Labs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. They led the industry with the Sound Blaster, which Aureal (a.k.a. Media Vision) went on to emulate.

  4. Not too comprehensive by Jack+Wagner · · Score: 0, Troll

    The issue I've seen with using foreign workers (we've hired plenty of them on H1b visa's, by the way) is you tend to get a large quantity of work but not always a large quality of work. Some of the software houses in India will churn out a plethora of code for cut rate prices but you're stuck with what you get.

    I prefer to hire locally now, and pay a little more for someone who is concerned with their actual career, as opposed to someone who is simply shooting for a quick couple bucks and not at all concerned with the industry or the quality of their work.

    This follows the classic theory taught by Mel Brooks in "The Mythical Man Month" where he talks about how you cannot draw a linear conclusion on the quality of code based upon the diagonal matrix of time vs lines written.

    Warmest regards,
    --Jack

    --


    Wagner LLC Consulting Co. - Getting it right the first time
    1. Re:Not too comprehensive by MrNovember · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      You know that scene in the Man-Month where they're designing the System/360 and they all start farting? That's hilarious!

    2. Re:Not too comprehensive by jmb-d · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      This follows the classic theory taught by Mel Brooks in "The Mythical Man Month"

      You misspelled Fred Brooks.

      Although I do think that Mel Brooks could do something fun with the topic...

      --
      In walking, just walk. In sitting, just sit. Above all, don't wobble.
      -- Yun-Men
    3. Re:Not too comprehensive by OldStash · · Score: 1

      No offence, but you seem to be generalising. On the one hand you are considering a small group of local firms which you presumably split into either "good" or "bad". On the other hand, you are considering the thousands of Indian firms, which you label "bad". If you hit upon a lousy local firm would you consider all American firms to be lousy?

      It's trite, I know, but it's worth saying: Not all firms are the same. There is a much greater diversity in those thousands of foreign firms than there is in the few local ones.

    4. Re:Not too comprehensive by 9jack9 · · Score: 1
      Well, the article discusses quality.

      At the same time, Wipro has embraced quality. In six years, it has trained 7,000 employees in Six Sigma and completed 1,000 quality projects. Six years ago, Fast Company pro?led a team at Lockheed-Martin that wrote nearly perfect code ( "They Write the Right Stuff," Dec : Jan 1997 ). The team's claim to fame: It was one of only four out?ts in the world to achieve Level 5 certi?cation from the Software Engineering Institute. Wipro has Level 5 certi?cation in three different categories. It's eye-glazing stuff, but an amazing achievement.

      It's pretty scary to consider competing with the likes of this. It will be "interesting" to see how the US technology industry responds to these sorts of challenges. Interesting as in the old Chinese curse, "May you live in interesting times". Will we respond by honing our competitive advantages? Will it spur us to upgrade our school system? Or maybe reduce Johnny's and Sally's weekly Disney ration down to only 20 hours a week and send them to do some extra homework? Or maybe spur legislative initiatives to curb outsourcing? (Trade sanctions! That's it! That's the ticket!) Will we cut off foreign aid? (Do we give India any foreign aid? I don't know. Seems like we give just about everyone foreign aid.) Or will we just sit here watching the latest pr0n, music video, reality TV until one day we realize that the economic imbalance that we currently enjoy no longer exists and that all we've gotten for it is entertainment and electronic gizmos we don't even understand any more.

      Perhaps our children or grandchildren will be proud to work in the factories that will spring up fifty years from now because suddenly we're the cheap, unskilled labor.

    5. Re:Not too comprehensive by sharkey · · Score: 1

      classic theory taught by Mel Brooks in "The Mythical Man Month" where he talks about how you cannot draw a linear conclusion on the quality of code based upon the diagonal matrix of time vs lines written.

      I prefer the theory put forth by Mel Brooks that you shouldn't use an abnormal brain when bringing a dead man back to life.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    6. Re:Not too comprehensive by Lechter · · Score: 1

      Also worth pointing out is that there are high tech applications which will never be outsourced: Government ones.

      Of course, there's the "National Security" projects which can't be outsourced (that would be about the only way to make Total Information Awareness look worse); and most high-tech research projects at NASA, etc. (even if they work with Universities) are secured. In fact, few IT contracts the Fed authors will allow foreign nationals (H1B or no) to work on them).

      --
      credo quia absurdum
    7. Re:Not too comprehensive by Khelder · · Score: 1
      Mel Brooks in "The Mythical Man Month"

      Good point, but I think you mean Fred Brooks. Great book, BTW.

    8. Re:Not too comprehensive by watzinaneihm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They have quantity but no quality
      So they said when Jpaneese started importing cars , and then when samsung shipped hard disks and ....
      Essentially there is nothing stopping indians or anybody else from doing quality work.

      --
      .ACMD setaloiv siht gnidaeR
    9. Re:Not too comprehensive by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
      theory taught by Mel Brooks in "The Mythical Man Month"

      Uh... That's Fred Brooks. He's the technological genius.

      As for Mel, his forte was business genius, as anyone who watched "The Producers" or saw the monster "dog and pony show" in "Young Frankenstein" well knows.

      --
      That is all.
    10. Re:Not too comprehensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a technology consultant, resident in Europe, and I have worked with Wipro on a couple of projects - they are very, very impressive, with smart hard-working people. The same is true of a telco I worked with in India - the techies were scarily well-informed on the most bleeding-edge technologies. India is a big place, so the tiny percentage of people who graduate from top universities still have to compete for good jobs at Wipro and co - the result is a very high standard of professional skills.

      I'm sure there are basic bodyshops in India, but Wipro is more than that. And no, I don't have shares in them...

    11. Re:Not too comprehensive by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

      Where do I get the money to pay for the retraining into newer tech and the people to hire me in this new tech when I don't have any experience? This is the problem that you economic theorists like to ignore when babbling about the economic benefits of outsourcing.

      What happens to people like me? We get classified as dead-wood and thrown on the scrapheap. Then it's back to college to compete with a bunch of 21 years olds for jobs, or a career in fast food.

      I'm a COBOL programmer. I'm stuck where I am and no matter how hard I've tried to move on I can't seem to get the training in newer tech. So now I'm screwed. You can get 5 Indians for the price of me, and at 32 I don't see how I can start again when the competition is far younger and less jaded than I am, even if I had the slightest idea what career I should choose next.

      No doubt I'll get a load of college students trolling me about how I should have moved into Unix/Windows, well I have been trying to escape Mainframe work for 6 or 7 years and, despite a brief flirtation with Solaris, nothing.

      Any suggestions, given that you can't get a job without experience and you can't get experience without a job?

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
    12. Re:Not too comprehensive by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      My advice. If you really want to sling code then you are going to have to update your skills. My belief is that the least expensive way to do that is to pick a Free Software project that looks interesting and which you think might solve a real problem and pitch in. Not only does Free Software give you all of the software development tools that you could possibly need, but it also offers something even more important, source code.

      You almost certainly have learned some stuff writing COBOL that you could apply to a Free Software project. At the very least you probably have some industry specific information that would be invaluable to somebody.

      The fact of the matter is that you should move to UNIX/Windows, at the very least you should check out Linux, because IBM is pushing Linux on the mainframe pretty hard. The good news is that learning Linux doesn't require thousands of dollars worth of software investments.

    13. Re:Not too comprehensive by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

      I've been using Linux for about 3 years now, but home experience is irrelevant to business. They want real experience.

      I would like to help out on Free Software projects but my C and Java skills haven't progressed much beyond writing text editors yet.

      My rather convoluted point, as well as asking for help, was that I can't just go get another job in IT like so many of the posters seem to think you can.

      I know that IBM are pushing Linux on the mainframe and I have tried putting the feelers out for a change of career from Applications to Networks/Systems, but no joy so far.

      I'm in a vicious circle. Limited skills in new stuff, no experience, and no way out but to start again in something else. What a waste of 13 years.

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
    14. Re:Not too comprehensive by shakah · · Score: 1
      This follows the classic theory taught by Mel Brooks in "The Mythical Man Month"...
      Mel Brooks is an entertainer, you're probably thinking of Frederick Brooks.
      Wagner LLC Consulting Co. - Getting it right the first time
      Well, maybe the second time...
    15. Re:Not too comprehensive by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      I've been using Linux for about 3 years now, but home experience is irrelevant to business. They want real experience.

      Yes, people that are currently using Mainframes will want serious support when and if they decide to use Linux. So you will have to move down the food chain a bit. I have Linux boxes that I admin on the side scattered all around town. There are all sorts of small businesses that need reliable, mission-critical servers on a tight budget. Small businesses are much less concerned about how much experience you have, and they have absolutely no idea that there is a difference between a mainframe and a PC running Linux.

      I would like to help out on Free Software projects but my C and Java skills haven't progressed much beyond writing text editors yet.

      Heck, that's more experience than you need for some types of projects :). I am not saying that you should try and help Tom Lane with PostgreSQL internals. Start on something simpler. For example, create (and share) your own Zope Product (they are pretty easy to write, plus you'll learn Python).

      My rather convoluted point, as well as asking for help, was that I can't just go get another job in IT like so many of the posters seem to think you can.

      No, I got your point, and I feel your pain. I have had to scramble a bit myself recently.

      I'm in a vicious circle. Limited skills in new stuff, no experience, and no way out but to start again in something else. What a waste of 13 years.

      The worst part is that things are likely to get worse before they get better. Fortunately for you most of the Indian shops aren't targeting the mainframe, or COBOL for that matter. Your advantage is that you have 13 years of experience in big iron computing. You know what those bad boys get used for, and you know how to write software that runs the business. That's a huge advantage over most of the rest of us. The trick now is to move those skills to a more vibrant platform.

  5. This type of article sounds familiar... by JZ_Tonka · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...JonKatz...?

    Is that you??

  6. I live in Bangalore by Omkar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And it is more boring than my hometown, Canton OH. This article gets the basic business facts right, but it neglects the massive operations companies like GE and Intel are running/starting. Many companies are doing their work inhouse at low cost here.

    1. Re:I live in Bangalore by intnsred · · Score: 1
      but it neglects the massive operations companies like GE and Intel are running/starting. Many companies are doing their work inhouse at low cost here.

      Not surprising. Do those trans-national corporations really have any loyalty to the US or India? It just happens to be where many of their executives, stockholders, and some of their employees happen to live. In the worship of the dollar, nations don't mean anything.

      For that matter, employees don't really matter either: they're just variables which can impact production, sales, and profits -- but which country those employees are located in are irrelevant as long as their are no trade/international issues impacting the corporation.

    2. Re:I live in Bangalore by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      In the worship of the dollar, nations don't mean anything.

      I'm pretty sure you don't realise how ironical that statement is.

  7. the word "global" by Maeryk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Makes me want to kill someone. At the very utterance of it an anything other than a purely scientific or geographic sense. The company I contract for has gone "global" now. Every possible place for that damned buzzword to get jammed in has been used.

    Whats worse, the BOD has been seeded with European managers. Now, dont get me wrong, I have nothing against europeans, but you cannot take a company that has been doing NE Corridor style work processes for 20+ years and suddenly kick it over to the "european" business model. Things apparently get done a lot more slowly over there.

    You wouldnt think there would be much of a difference, but its subtle, yet huge. Just the minute changes in our response contracts are huge.
    Going from a 4x8 SLA to a proposed 8x36 on a hardware repair? (Which might sound great.. but it means less money, and once you have been 4x8 for five years, its REALLY hard to switch gears).

    Our "accident prevention" issues are now tied to India, Sri Lanka, Korea, and europe. And we _all_ pay when some plant in some third world country where emissions arent an issue suffers some injury. I am all for "safety in the workplace".. but you should really be only tied to that which you have some influence or control over.

    Its a completely different business culture, and some cultures just shouldnt mix like that.

    YMMV, of course.

    --
    Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
    1. Re:the word "global" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>Its a completely different business culture, and some cultures just shouldnt mix like that.


      I do not know how this guy get a score of 3. Here's an article on BBC which reports about guys like you: Colour still marks US job market

    2. Re:the word "global" by Maeryk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I do not know how this guy get a score of 3. Here's an article on BBC which reports about guys like you: Colour still marks US job market [bbc.co.uk]

      That has _nothing_ whatsoever to do with what I am talking about.

      I could give a rats ass about color, creed, religion, or national origin on a personal or professional level. Im talking about business cultures.. like the difference between mom-and-pop shop where you call and get a live person, and CorpCo where you get a 12 minute "press or say 1 to listen to our menu, which has changed" and eventually end up on the voice mail of some drone who doesnt want to answer it and sits and watches it ring.

      Im talking about the fact that you take a company that a _lot_ of people have worked their butts off to make a success here in the US, and suddenly tie its success and/or operations to some fledgeling endeavor in europe somewhere, run by people who have no clue how we do business here. Its a true cultural gap, and its not about what color people are, its about how they learned to work.

      EG: I used to work in a nursery (trees) and the guy who owned it would bring in cambodian and honduran laborers on a work visa, set them up with a soc. sec. number, and taxes and everything. These guys worked CIRCLES around us and went from sunup to sundown, no matter how much you told em to take it a little easier. They loved the ability to do so.. because they were actually making pretty good money (compared to what they were used to) and were making inroads into bringing themselves and their familys to america.

      Now.. he didnt do this because he hated the US, or because their labor was cheaper.. he did it because after years of putting ads in the paper, and using the two other kids he had working for him as word of mouth, he couldnt get anyone here to DO the work for what he was paying. (which wasnt bad wages, I might add). Its a cultural difference..

      Compare that to companies which are now expanding into other countries, and discovering that people will work 14 hour days for 7.95 an hour to do the same job you are getting 30 bucks an hour to do, and they wont bitch about it, and wonder why "global" is such a buzzword suddenly?

      Maeryk

      --
      Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
    3. Re:the word "global" by russellh · · Score: 1

      Hey this is slashdot. We know globals are bad. integrating previously separate namespaces is bound to produce endless conflicts.

      --
      must... stay... awake...
    4. Re:the word "global" by pubjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Whats worse, the BOD has been seeded with European managers. Now, dont get me wrong, I have nothing against europeans, but you cannot take a company that has been doing NE Corridor style work processes for 20+ years and suddenly kick it over to the "european" business model. Things apparently get done a lot more slowly over there.

      I can't help but feel that the USA is in danger of losing its global dominance because of the general attitude of Americans that "We're just better". Your insight above has prompted me to say this, but some of the other responses to this article also make me think it.

      It is true that the USAs economic success is in part down to the intelligence, innovation and hard work of its natives. But it is also down to its unique historical position of being a very young country with a single unified people. (In other words, a huge homogenous market - a startup company in the USA has a massive easily accessible market on its doorstep. That's not so true in the rest of the world.)

      Don't sit on your laurels, Americans. The rest of the world isn't as stupid, or as lazy, as many of you seem to think.

    5. Re:the word "global" by Maeryk · · Score: 1

      I can't help but feel that the USA is in danger of losing its global dominance because of the general attitude of Americans that "We're just better". Your insight above has prompted me to say this, but some of the other responses to this article also make me think it.

      Unfortunately, I think you are right. I dont share that belief that "we is the best" and if I gave that impression, I apologize. (See my followup post for more info.) However, I do feel that different business models need more time to homogenize into something good, rather than a sudden 180 degree turn to "heres the new, better way. Do it or screw you".

      Don't sit on your laurels, Americans. The rest of the world isn't as stupid, or as lazy, as many of you seem to think.


      Hear hear! I personally think that is utterly true.. but since the majority of the US thinks "world news" means reading the "national" section of USA Today, I tend to think I am in the minority. Denis Leary's routine about "and you know why we are the best? cause we've got the bomb! thats why" was a joke for him.. but I strongly suspect a lot of people actually believe that to be true.

      It's a shame, really. Japan, for instance, was given all the tools after world war two to make themselves into whatever they wanted, and they did.. became a powerhouse in the electronics, auto, etc, industries. And we suddenly got scared. But we certainly have the ability to out-pace them, if we put our collective minds to it.
      Problem is, unions and idiot lawsuits wont allow that to happen, not to mention billions of middle managers who feel the need to leave their inane and often useless mark on a project, dooming it to never being "right". (Yes.. I have seen plenty of PHB's do exactly what happens in the Dilbert strips.)

      Maeryk

      --
      Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
    6. Re:the word "global" by Doc+Hopper · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't naturally associate "unions", "idiot lawsuits", and "phbs" in the same sentence together. Although I'm a non-unionized technology worker, I value the contribution of unions to enforcing fair pay, fair working conditions, and providing valuable services to many employees. Given the chance, any corporation will exploit its workers to the maximum extent possible; unions provide a valuable balance to their overzealousness.

      I know a lot of people, particularly intelligent computer people, are terrifically anti-union. Yet without the unions looking out for workers, we would have horrific working conditions and far bleaker employment prospects than we have today. It's largely due to the efforts of unions that we work less than 16 hours a day, enjoy health benefits, and in general have reasonable working conditions around the U.S.. In an ideal world, employees would be a scarce resource and employers would have to compete with nice benefits for workers, but we don't live there.

      As with so many advancements, you won't notice them until they are gone. Unions are not the problem, corruption is. The solution is to get bright, ethical people into the professions the unions represent. There are smart people in every line of work on the planet.

    7. Re:the word "global" by BrianH · · Score: 1

      None of which will soon matter. The problem with unions is that they reward mediocrity and supress innovation by placing seniority above skill, and bracketing everybody into the same payscale to be "fair". This is causing those jobs to move offshore, which results in those "protected and unionized" workers losing their jobs to a $2 an hour substinence programmer in Mumbai. IMO, a crappy non-union job is better than no job at all.

      --

      There is nothing so pathetic as seeing a beautiful young theory roughed up by a tough gang of facts.
  8. Re:lol... by Gyan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    but it doesn't say to much about us lot as erm.. a species

    I'll take the bait posed by your cultural ignorance.

    In India, the concept of a nuclear family hsan't taken hold among the masses.

    Why ?

    1) A billion people in that much land.
    2) Taking care of elders is a vital edict of the culture. You don't send them off to "elderly nursing homes."
    3) Just because he lives them with them doesn't mean he's financially dependent on them. Likely the other way around.

  9. Wipro and UML by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Having worked on a project in which large portions had been outsourced to Wipro, I can say that saying they can code Java and follow OO methodologies is lot like saying that because I have seen a football thrown, that I can play football.

    Another issue many companies haven't yet realized, is that the majority good engineers in India, have left India. Those remaining for the most part are not the sharpest knives in the drawer.

    1. Re:Wipro and UML by sisukapalli1 · · Score: 1

      I believe a lot has changed in India in the last 10 years. There are much higher salaries (compared to what they were around '93 time), the internet and the satellite/cable TV has bridged a cultural gap (you get the same info from anywhere in the world), the work environment seems to be very good (as more and more people stay back in India, or opt to return to India, it becomes autocatalytic).

      S

    2. Re:Wipro and UML by SuperMario666 · · Score: 1

      Another issue many companies haven't yet realized, is that the majority good engineers in India, have left India. Those remaining for the most part are not the sharpest knives in the drawer.

      I hate to break it to you, but software development is getting the assembly line treatment just like other industries have in the past. Brainpower and expensively acquired "jack-of-all-trades" knowledge is increasingly not required.

    3. Re:Wipro and UML by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've worked on a few projects with Wipro, both completely outsourced in Bangalore, and also with a small team shipped over to our offices in the UK.
      I've found that the majority of the people I've worked with have been hard-working individuals who want to increase their knowledge and skills.
      However, their skills and knowledge are primarily learnt straight from the textbook and they have little if any experience in the real world.
      The costs savings of the developers are lost when you consider the management overhead, the extra testing and quality assurance overhead, and the time taken to explain the business.

    4. Re:Wipro and UML by MountainBoiler · · Score: 1
      I can't comment on Wipro, or its quality of work. But it seams to be focussing on known projects w/ known solutions. Cookie-cutter solutions. Stuff that American companies and their employees were getting paid fat amounts for very little ingenuity.

      Look at Japan and remember the 80's. The Japanese are famous for duplicating and making smaller, cheaper (especially in electronics). Yet they haven't killed off companies in USA and Europe that make ingenious solutions, or are good at branding/marketing. They just trimmed some of the fat off of complacent companies/countries. Now they are facing countries doing the same to them (China, Korea, etc.)

      Then there is the issue of 'good' engineers from India. The early ones leaving India had to be damned good to be taken seriously. And they were. That set up the reputation that they typical Indian in USA was better than the typical American. Early on, they were (top 1% of 1 country compared to full range of US). Once the reputation was in place, you didn't have to be in the top 1% from India to come - just want to cash in on a higher standard of living. So the 'typical' Indian in the US has been dropping, arguably to near 'typical' American levels.

      The motivation has changed for the Indians in the mean time. The early ones were out to be the best they could be (blaze the path). Now the path is established, the incentive is to cash in, thus less brilliance/ingenuity. Now some of the bright Indians see the challenge of raising their country (instead of cashing in personally). So some want to stay home.

      I don't know about the typical Indian IT worker in India vs. abroad, but the gap is closing.

      This is based upon working for an American company starting its own dev center in India. Been there a bunch of times myself. Interviewing people for Indian office I discovered most wanted an opportunity to get to the US. If that was their motivation, I shouldn't have been suprised that their work wasn't excellent. It was below what was done in our US office.

      The trick was on them, since a company outsourcing is looking for cheaper work - not to bring them to the US and higher salaries.

    5. Re:Wipro and UML by agslashdot · · Score: 1

      "the majority good engineers in India, have left India. Those remaining for the most part are not the sharpest knives in the drawer"

      Well said.
      Over 50% , that's right 50%, of the creme-de-la-creme of Indian undergradutes from the IITs leave India. Every year. And in departments like Comp Science and EE, its over 90%.

      In general, over 20 million Indians have left India. Over 80% of them are in IT.

      The most overcrowded offices in India are the US Embassy, The Australian embassy, the NZ embassy and the Canadian embassy. On a cold winter's day, you'll catch thousands of people queued outside these, just dying to immigrate.

      Its easy to paint a rosy picture of Wipro or Infosys, but ask the people who leave India why they do so if the opportunity is so great. The reality is not rosy at all.

    6. Re:Wipro and UML by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      However, their skills and knowledge are primarily learnt straight from the textbook and they have little if any experience in the real world.

      Perfect fit the the demand. PHB's rarely value experience much anyhow.

    7. Re:Wipro and UML by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      that saying they can code Java and follow OO methodologies

      Which of the 326,482 OO methodologies are you talking about? With the crisis in OO guru agreement, somebody could "wing it" and nobody would know the difference.

    8. Re:Wipro and UML by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for the company mentioned in the article and I agree. They sent us an "expert" that could not put a CD in a cdrom drive. When told he had it upside down, he tried to hold it to the underside of the cd tray. This guy is pretty typical.

    9. Re:Wipro and UML by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Do you really expect us to believe you ?

      stop playing fool and come to real world.

    10. Re:Wipro and UML by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Wipro, Infosys and TCS can't hire 20 million people! People are free to go whereever they want and whereever they are accepted...simple democracy.

      -Sas

  10. 80s hysterics? by lutzomania · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is very reminiscient of the "Godzilla has arrived" mania that swept the US back in the 1980s. Mayne serious people then believed that Japan was going to buy the US (in cash) and then enslave us all in their Toyota factories. We know now how wrong they were.

    India is certainly becoming a force in the global IT industry, but let's not get swept away by Fast Company's muscular prose and usual hyperbole.

    Also, I think it's important to remember that real economic growth comes more from innovation than from cheap labor. Companies are willing to pay developers $150K a year if the products they're creating will cover those costs and return a large profit to boot. A lot of the work being offloaded to India (or at least the work that my previous employer shipped there) was maintenanced release testing, legacy OS ports, code cleanup, etc. Nobody was asking them to design the next killer app.

    Of course, maybe it's good that these waves of paranoia wash ashore every few years. They prevent us from getting complacent.

    1. Re:80s hysterics? by anonymousman77 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't you see that this is 100% different than the 1980s? In the 80s, employers were loyal to employees. Now, the US companies they mention (specifically EDS) ships everything they can to subcontractors in India.

      This WOULD all blow over if our companies weren't taking advantage of the cheap labor over there. As it stands, it will continue to rack us in the nuts until our salaries match the ones in India.

      Globalization = cheap shirts, fewer jobs, and a fast-paced race to the bottom.

    2. Re:80s hysterics? by lutzomania · · Score: 1

      In the 80s, employers were loyal to employees.

      That's just plain wrong. Did you happen to live near a city like Pittsburgh or Detroit in the 80s? I did (Pittsburgh, specifically Johnstown, PA). The steel companies were decidedly disloyal to the workers and happily shipped many, many steel jobs to Asia & South America.

      If you remember, the Japan panic in the 80s was also related to cheap labor. They were building better cars and electronics than we were and at much lower costs. Whether or not this was due to labor unions driving up costs or Americans simply increasing their standard of living will be debated forever, but that was the reason.

    3. Re:80s hysterics? by guacamolefoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If people want to continue to earn their big fat paychecks and live at lifestyles grossly exceeding those in other countries, then they have to prove that they are economically worth it.

      Why does anyone born here in the US have an entitlement to a lifestyle while someone in Bangalore doesn't? If they are putting out quality work at half the price, then too fricking bad. Being in the US doesn't mean a lifetime entitlement to a lifestyle far exceeding that found in other countries just by the virtue of the accident of your birth.

      If the US wants to stay on top, you'd better stop crying when you find out that someone overseas can do your job just as well you can only for a bowl of rice and a fish a day (or a bowl of rice and curry a day) instead of $75,000. Get used to it. Textile workers, assembly plant workers, etc., have all had to deal with that for years. Why are tech jobs so different?

      You want paid well? You earn it in the marketplace. And guess what -- competition is global, and your fat paycheck is a fat target. Remember that each day you go to work.

    4. Re:80s hysterics? by anonymousman77 · · Score: 1

      Japan was subsidizing all of their industries in the 1980s and still do today, that is why their crap was so cheap. Look at the situation they got themselves into from this practice!! India labor is cheap because they live in squalor, not because their government is helping them out. Also, with 200 million unemployed people, there is NO chance that wages will ever rise in that country in our lifetime. Japan had FAR fewer people. Don't compare Japan to India, at least not in this sense.

    5. Re:80s hysterics? by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      Don't you see that this is 100% different than the 1980s? In the 80s, employers were loyal to employees.

      Can you back that up with something other than mere nostalgia?

      In general employers are as loyal to employees as employees are to employers. If someone gets a better offer (more money, fewer hours, shorter commute, whatever) they will happily resign and go take up the offer - effectively sacking their employer and getting a new one. That's as it should be, because it forces companies to compete for the best employees. And similarly, there is competition for the best employers, which happens whenever more than one person applies for a job.

      This WOULD all blow over if our companies weren't taking advantage of the cheap labor over there. As it stands, it will continue to rack us in the nuts until our salaries match the ones in India.

      Or until their salaries match yours, which is far more likely.

      Globalization = cheap shirts, fewer jobs, and a fast-paced race to the bottom.

      Bad news for shirt makers, good news for shirt wearers.

    6. Re:80s hysterics? by anonymousman77 · · Score: 1

      Gosh, CEO positions can be had in India for less than $100,000 a year. Why aren't more CEOs living in India?

      It's not about competition. It's about people at the top relentlessly trying to force the people at the bottom further and further down the standard of living scale.

      Why are CEO wages still rising while everyone else's are falling right now? Have you stopped to think about this?

    7. Re:80s hysterics? by anonymousman77 · · Score: 1

      The idea with Globalization was that crappy jobs like shirt making would be moved off shore so those folks could get better jobs doing something else.

      I guess my programmer job at EDS sucked ass anyway, so when they moved it off shore I got the job of watching TV all day on unemployment while searching for any job (ANY) job possible on the 'net. I got one and accepted a 20% pay cut just for the privalige of working with no benefits.

      Thanks, globlaization! I can buy cheap shirts, but if I get sick, I'm in deep shit!

    8. Re:80s hysterics? by Lechter · · Score: 1

      Actually, a major factor in derailing Japan's world domination was their economic collapse in the early 90's. (They're still in a bit of a recession from it.)

      Of course, that crash was largely due to the overly close and trusting relationships between businessmen (bankers giving huge loans at good rates to friends who promised to repay them, but later couldn't).

      That was the Japanese achilles heel, America's might have been unions, or company loyalty; what remains to be seen is where or if India will falter.

      Of course, with companies so internationally diversified, they won't hurt too much either way, now their employees...

      --
      credo quia absurdum
    9. Re:80s hysterics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does anyone born here in the US have an entitlement to a lifestyle while someone in Bangalore doesn't? If they are putting out quality work at half the price, then too fricking bad. Being in the US doesn't mean a lifetime entitlement to a lifestyle far exceeding that found in other countries just by the virtue of the accident of your birth.

      Honestly, I don't care what the standard of living is in Bangalore or wherever. I live and work in the U.S., so that's important to me. I support free trade and globalization only so far as it improves the standard of living for the vast majority of Americans. This is good for the developing nations too, since it raises their standard of living as well. Many people here are touching on the fact that we are coming to a point that further globalization is going to pull up the "global" standard of living at the expense of the U.S. This is simply unacceptible. We are the primary market for much of this stuff, so we have a right to say "This is as far as we are going with this."

      Granted this is easier said than done, but yes, I do think that being born in the U.S. entitles one to a better standard of living. This has been purchased by the blood, sweat, and tears of our forefathers (as well as a little imperial plunder).

      I'm all for bringing up the rest of the world to our standard, but not at the expense of my own quality of life, as well as that of my family.

    10. Re:80s hysterics? by guacamolefoo · · Score: 1

      Gosh, CEO positions can be had in India for less than $100,000 a year. Why aren't more CEOs living in India?

      Because India sucks if you're really rich. No shit, Sherlock.

      It's not about competition. It's about people at the top relentlessly trying to force the people at the bottom further and further down the standard of living scale.

      It's never about making someone else poorer. It's about becoming relatively richer. That is an extremely important difference.

      Why are CEO wages still rising while everyone else's are falling right now? Have you stopped to think about this?

      Are their companies making money? CEO skills are not as transferrable as are line worker skills. Not many people can run GE like Jack Welch did. Many people can program in C.

      I think that in today's society, you have a couple of choices.

      The first is to own the means of production and lay claim to a share of corporate profits. This means spending less than you earn and saving your ass off.

      The second is to innovate and have skills that make you relatively more valuable than your neighbor. If you can't justify why your salary is higher than someone with the same skills, you've answered any question about whether you are replaceable.

      This is a free agent world. You are competing against everybody. The winners are going to take more and more of the earnings as jobs and skills in the middle and at the bottom become more and more interchangeable.

      Is this fair? Maybe not. Is it "good"? Maybe not. Is it the real world? You bet your ass it is.

      This is the real world that steel workers and auto workers and textile workers have dealt with for the past couple of generations. The IT business had better look at that and decide how to avoid a similar fate.

      GF.

    11. Re:80s hysterics? by machine+of+god · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why are we so adversarial? We are on top now, and we like it that way, but now that we're slipping we're afraid we're going to be enslaved like you said. Maybe those countries just want a better place for themselves, and I don't see a problem with it. It's not like it's economic war. And it makes sense that a company would move it's production somewhere cheaper. Bitching and moaning isn't going to help. The thing is, it would be natural for them to stay here, they don't even need a reason not to move. However, there is a big one to move, so they do.

    12. Re:80s hysterics? by intnsred · · Score: 1

      Also, I think it's important to remember that real economic growth comes more from innovation than from cheap labor.

      Excellent point. All through the American industrialization of the 19th century US wages were higher than most European nations. This meant a distinct incentive for industries to automate, simply to avoid the sky-high US labor costs.

      Let's hope that trend continues...

    13. Re:80s hysterics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If people want to continue to earn their big fat paychecks and live at lifestyles grossly exceeding those in other countries, then they have to prove that they are economically worth it.

      My lifestyle? Do you think that even a majority of my paycheck goes to support *my* lifestyle?

      My paycheck pays for the "right" for every child in the US to go through high school. It pays for the "right" of minimum wage and 40 hour work week. It pays for the "right" to be able to walk into an emergency room and expect care. It pays for the "right" of cheap secondary education. It pays for the "right" of clean land, air, and water. It pays for the "right" of universal phone, water, and electrical service. It pays for the "right" of travel, for honest civil employees, and for a million other things that people in the US don't even know are luxuries any more.

      The US government will not be able to borrow forever. And if the US wants to preserve these luxuries it better hold on to my "big fat paychecks"

    14. Re:80s hysterics? by gorbachev · · Score: 1

      So there they are, the people born in India, thinking that being born in India entitles them to a better standard of living than what they have now.

      And some of them have figured out that educating themselves into IT professionals they can raise their standard of living by a tenfold, if not more.

      Somehow I don't see them crying over a few snotty americans getting laid off.

      If you insist on having American companies pay you more, just because you're born in the US, do expect enterprising individuals (such as the head of Wipro) in the developing countries to set up competing companies with better cost structures. You either cut cost, or you see COMPANIES dissappear. Either way, you will lose your job.

      How do you suppose you're going to stop the process? Laying on your ass and whining about your God given right to a fat paycheck? Or making sure you develop your skills to remain competitive in the global job market? Don't expect any help from your American company. They will remain concerned ONLY about the company, and about you, only if that is for the benefit of the company. If they can replace you with an equally competent professional (or a team of 4 lesser folks, who produce the same results) that costs them 50% less, you can bet your ass they're going to kick your behind out the door. And that's the way it is supposed to be.

      Remember it is the US who's been championing the idea of free economy, open markets and all that good stuff. Now reap what you sow...can't have it both ways.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
    15. Re:80s hysterics? by smallpaul · · Score: 1

      Globalization = cheap shirts, fewer jobs, and a fast-paced race to the bottom.

      This would be a more impressive pronouncement if it were backed up with facts. But as globalization picked up steam in the 1990s, the unemployment rate dropped. In fact, surprisingly enough, the US unemployment rate pretty much mirrors the highs and lows of the US economy (driven by such factors as tax rates and consumer confidence) and has little to do with the success or failure of companies in Asia. Those are the facts as demonstrated by history.

    16. Re:80s hysterics? by sdcharle · · Score: 1
      Low unemployment sounds great at first, then you start noticing how many 'Hey, I used to be a programmer' comments you get from Wal-Mart employees when you wear your geek T-shirt there.

      Low unemployment, sure, but are people shifting to jobs that pay less?

    17. Re:80s hysterics? by anonymousman77 · · Score: 1

      Unemployment and underemployment are two different things. Wages are DECREASING right now. This is called deflation. Deflation is BAD.

      Yes, unemployment went down during the 90s. One BIG factor in this is the fact that we incarcerated all kinds of "criminals" who would be out on the streets in other countries (pot dealers, etc) presumably unemployed.

      Stop believing everything your Econ teacher teaches you. He's never had to REALLY look for a job in an industry where there are people who are more than willing to do your job for 1/10 what it takes to survive here.

    18. Re:80s hysterics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>>This is the real world that steel workers and auto workers and textile workers have dealt with for the past couple of generations. The IT business had better look at that and decide how to avoid a similar fate.

      Once again, another example of the regular working man suffering in order to FATTEN UP THE RICH PEOPLE'S WALLETS WITH HIGHER PROFITS from cheaper labor. When all the decent paying jobs are shipped overseas, who in the heck is going to be left to be able to buy products here in the U.S.? Sure not the middle class. I have read numerous articles (no, I am not going to show friggin examples, look them up yourself) that shows the median income of the middle class has DECLINED in the last 20 years due to this trend. Eventually, there will only be the very rich and the very poor. The middle class will be eliminated. This can be modded as a troll if you want, but I am sick of people saying this is global competition and to just suck it up. If a U.S. company wanted to set up shop in most of these foreign countries, their government would throw up every roadblock they can to stop us in order to protect the local status quo. God help if we do that to them when they come here! They scream bloody murder and how unfair it is!!!!

    19. Re:80s hysterics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once again, another example of the regular working man suffering in order to FATTEN UP THE RICH PEOPLE'S WALLETS WITH HIGHER PROFITS from cheaper labor.

      Do you know what percentage of americans own or benefit from stocks via insurance, pensions, or direct ownership?

      What is "rich" to you in terms of earnings and net worth?

      When all the decent paying jobs are shipped overseas, who in the heck is going to be left to be able to buy products here in the U.S.?

      People have made this argument for years, and, lo and behold, the U.S. is doing just dandy, thank you. Many jobs are service related (health care, legal, entertainment, financial, etc.) and cannot be shipped overseas. "Service jobs" do not mean just "hamburger flipping" despite what your local union boss/thug may have told you.

      I have read numerous articles (no, I am not going to show friggin examples, look them up yourself) that shows the median income of the middle class has DECLINED in the last 20 years due to this trend.

      Obviously, your lack of reading skills accounts for your sense of desperation. You are quite simply wrong. Real income for families has increased. While real income for single white male wage earners has been slow to grow, this is largely as a result of an enormous influx of women into the workplace over the last few decades. The number of people available to fill jobs was increased faster than the number of jobs increased, therefore wage growth was somewhat depressed. It still grew, however, in nominal and real terms.

      Eventually, there will only be the very rich and the very poor.

      Doubt it. The mediocre, such as yourself, will continue to exist as well.

      The middle class will be eliminated.

      Off to the death camps!

      This can be modded as a troll if you want,

      I want, I want!

      but I am sick of people saying this is global competition and to just suck it up.

      Too bad. It is global competition. Suck it up.

      If a U.S. company wanted to set up shop in most of these foreign countries, their government would throw up every roadblock they can to stop us in order to protect the local status quo. God help if we do that to them when they come here! They scream bloody murder and how unfair it is!!!!

      This last bit is too incoherent to even make fun of. Quit bitching about losing your job on /., and go file for unemployment. Then go get yourself a job. Loser.

      GF.

    20. Re:80s hysterics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, in case you haven't noticed, service jobs are in fact being shipped overseas. They mentioned it in the article itself, about legal jobs, call centers, financial tools. And they didn't even mention the fact that entertainment groups, such as animation shops, were shipped overseas years ago.

      But, it does seem rather suspicious that their CEO is being paid only 20000 times the amount of the worker bees.

      And, we here in the US slacker haven complain when the CEOs are making 200 times the amount of the worker bees.

      Fuedalism works. Death to all serfs!!!

    21. Re:80s hysterics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, clearly this is a self-correcting problem. As more jobs go overseas, unemployment will rise,and people in the US will be willing to work for less money. The newly enriched Maylasians will then look at shipping their undesirable jobs to the United States. Heck, Mexico might even look at keeping out the wetback norteamericanos.

      I don't see what all the fuss is about.

      GF.

    22. Re:80s hysterics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I have to hear you fuckers suck on Jack Welch's dick ONE MORE FUCKING time I swear I'll explode!

      Jack welch was an AXE man. He cut 20% of his staff EVERY FUCKING YEAR. Does it really take a genius to do that? The mother fucker got lucky that he was working for GE and not some other fucking company. I'm sick of him. He is NOTHING.

    23. Re:80s hysterics? by JasonAsbahr · · Score: 1

      Dude, don't forget the "right" to spend 50% of the budget on the military.

    24. Re:80s hysterics? by smallpaul · · Score: 1

      Unemployment and underemployment are two different things. Wages are DECREASING right now. This is called deflation. Deflation is BAD.

      You've confused so many things it isn't funny. Underemployment has nothing to do with decreasing wages and decreasing wages is NOT deflation. Decreasing _prices_ is deflation. And no, there is no indication that the American economy is deflating although that may happen soon. Nobody knows.

      Yes, unemployment went down during the 90s. One BIG factor in this is the fact that we incarcerated all kinds of "criminals" who would be out on the streets in other countries (pot dealers, etc) presumably unemployed.

      Oh, I see. So the computer jobs went to India and pot dealers went to jail and computer programmers were selling pot and thus not reflected in the unemployment numbers?

      Stop believing everything your Econ teacher teaches you.

      I've never had an econ teacher. What I know about economics is self-taught. But it doesn't take a brain surgeon to read the numbers. And the numbers were totally reflected on the street. Thousands of jobs were being shipped to India in the late 90s and it was _impossible_ to find a decent programmer who would accept less than a huge salary. According to your "they take our jobs" analysis, the programmer's salaries should have been dropping but they kept going up until the bubble popped.

      He's never had to REALLY look for a job in an industry where there are people who are more than willing to do your job for 1/10 what it takes to survive here.

      You're living out the downside of the bubble. It has nothing to do with cheaper Indian workers. When there is another state-side bubble programmers will be impossible to find or hire again. And when it pops, a bunch of them will be thrown out of work. Surprise! So goes the cycle. There is no use blaming foreigners.

    25. Re:80s hysterics? by smallpaul · · Score: 1

      Low unemployment sounds great at first, then you start noticing how many 'Hey, I used to be a programmer' comments you get from Wal-Mart employees when you wear your geek T-shirt there.

      Two years ago it was the opposite. "Hey, a month agao I worked at Walmart. Now I'm a programmer." That's what happens when you have a bubble and THIS is what happens when the bubble bursts. There will be another bubble, and nobody will mind that the Indians are helping us produce software faster, better and cheaper. Then there will be another burst and everyone will blame the Indians for taking our jobs.

    26. Re:80s hysterics? by anonymousman77 · · Score: 1

      Decreasing wages is a CLEAR sign of deflation. Prices go down (of course), this causes less corporate profits, which causes layoffs, which causes people to accept lower wages. Lower wages is the HALLMARK of deflation, and we're going to see it soon.

      The unemployment numbers are artifically low because so many people who would have been counted are in jail today. There are close to a million people in jail who wouldn't be in jail if their "crimes" were committed in Amsterdam. That million people would quite likely be unemployed anyway, which would increase the unemployment "Rate" by 1% or more.

    27. Re:80s hysterics? by anonymousman77 · · Score: 1

      The bubble that burst was the MOTHER of all bubbles.

      We will never see again a transfer of wealth from the upper class back to the middle class.
      We will never see good hard working people feeling safe in their jobs again.

      It's really sad.

      You must read BusinessWeek with all their cheerleaders to believe the bullshit you spew.

    28. Re:80s hysterics? by smallpaul · · Score: 1

      The bubble that burst was the MOTHER of all bubbles.

      Of course. We always live in exceptional times. Our bubble is always the biggest. Our problems are always the worst. Life will never be the same again.

      We will never see again a transfer of wealth from the upper class back to the middle class.

      There was no transfer of wealth. The poor made a little progres, the middle class did well and the upper class made out like bandits. Life isn't a zero sum game. Everyone can and did profit (but not in the same proportion!). Now that things have turned negative, we will all suffer, but of course the minimum wage single mother suffers much more than the CEOs who have to sell their cottages in Colorado.

      We will never see good hard working people feeling safe in their jobs again.

      Of course not. The world is only going to get worse from here on out. The end is nigh.

      You must read BusinessWeek with all their cheerleaders to believe the bullshit you spew.

      Nope. Try again.

    29. Re:80s hysterics? by anonymousman77 · · Score: 1

      The single mother is still employed at her minimum wage job while the middle-class person is trying to get ANY job whatsoever to pay his mortgage. The rich get richer and the middle class get poor. God bless the GOP!

      Are you independantly wealthy by any chance?

    30. Re:80s hysterics? by smallpaul · · Score: 1

      Independently wealthy? Nope. I'm a well-paid computer programmer and architect. I also hire other programmers so I know that the reason that it was easy to find a job two years ago and hard to find a job now has nothing to do with outsourcing and everything to do with the fact that big companies have frozen their IT budgets whereas two years ago they were spending like drunken sailors.

    31. Re:80s hysterics? by anonymousman77 · · Score: 1

      So are things going to get better anytime soon or should I look to find a job in another field?

      I love technology and I am a CS grad, but I cannot compete with $8k a year and I don't want to be forced to.

    32. Re:80s hysterics? by smallpaul · · Score: 1

      If you pick up unique skills you won't have to compete with $8K a year. I have no idea when the tech economy will pick up.

    33. Re:80s hysterics? by anonymousman77 · · Score: 1

      Unique skills like what? Forth? Python? TCL?

      As soon as a unique skill becomes needed, India will just pump out another 50,000 paper tigers to take the 2,000 jobs available.

      The American IT industry is doomed.

    34. Re:80s hysterics? by sdcharle · · Score: 1
      To inject my own, worth-the-money-it-cost-you opinion in to this, if you really love CS, you should stick with it. What else are you going to do? This country has FAR TOO MANY lawyers as it is, so unless you went into something specific and tech-oriented (patent law), that's no good. You could go to business school and be an unemployed MBA, but you might hate the coursework and your classmates.

      If you are reasonably good, and more importantly, very driven, you should be able to find something. India can't totally replace all US programmers and we can't have all IT functions being done from remote locations regardless of our fine technical advances.

      People still decide to be artists, writers, mathematicians, etc. even though those have never been sure roads to wealth or even solvency. Sometimes you just have to do what you have to do. You're fortunate to love what you're doing now. It just won't be the cake-walk getting a job that it was in 1999.

      Good luck.

    35. Re:80s hysterics? by anonymousman77 · · Score: 1

      Oh, we can't? Just like we can't have all the steel imported, we can't have all the textiles imported, and we can't have all the kid's toys imported?

      India will ruin this industry that I have loved for so many years. Sure, I'd like to be a beach bum, too, but that doesn't pay very f-ing well, does it? Just because someone likes doing something for a "living" doesn't mean it can be done anymore.

      I have a family to support, not just a dream of staying solvent. I want something I can support us on. IT was supposed to be that something, but thanks to our short-sighted government and a flood of nearly-free-as-in-beer programmers from another country, I can't have it.

      All I'm asking is "what now"? You say there are far too many lawyers, I say there are far too many PROGRAMMERS. Do you know any out of work lawyers?

    36. Re:80s hysterics? by sdcharle · · Score: 1
      There are quite a few out-of-work lawyers. You'd be amazed. Thanks to most Americans litigation-happiness, most of them stay employed helping people sue the Zoo because they touched a railing that was too hot, or suing a school because their kids grades were too low, or suing McDonald's for making them fat. Right now they're doing what they can to exacerbate the US's health care crisis by litigating malpractice insurance into the stratosphere.

      If money is A number 1 probably programming is not the way to go, unless you do something having to do with homeland security. That's probably the new gravy train, and as an American Citizen you'll definitely get preferential treatment in that area, I would think.

      On another note, you'd really like to be a beach bum? That sounds crushingly dull to me.

    37. Re:80s hysterics? by anonymousman77 · · Score: 1

      Money, of course, isn't A number 1 for me. However, stability IS A number 1. All that matters to me is that I get a steady income (I don't care if I never get a raise again).

      There are far more out of work programmers than there are out of work attorneys. AND they are not forced to compete against people demanding $8k/year as salary. PLUS they have the American Bar ASsociation making sure that never happens!

      What do WE have? The programmers guild!?!? Bhahahah!!!

      Hell yeah, I'd love to be a beach bum. Have you ever visited Florida in the wintertime? Still nice weather!!!

    38. Re:80s hysterics? by sdcharle · · Score: 1
      Well, I'm in definite agreement with you there. The lawyers have the ABA, the doctors have the AMA, and all we programmers have are a bunch of Libertarians who freak out whenever anybody even mentions the 'U' word.

      Meanwhile it's working nicely for the doctors and the lawyers while we lose our shirts.

      Not that you'll need a shirt if you choose beach bum route.

      It's also interesting that doctors and lawyers have the good sense to put some of their wealth in to lobbying efforts. The only lobbying I ever hear about that's IT-related involves raising H1B caps. IEEE seems to try to represent and go against these sorts of things, but they usually get shouted down it seems...

    39. Re:80s hysterics? by anonymousman77 · · Score: 1

      So what can we do? I will avoid using the "U" word because the auto-modder will mod me as a Troll if I use it.

      I am actually in an MBA program (and I was in it BEFORE all the reports came out saying that MBAs are worthless/dime-a-dozen/etc). I am under no delusions that this will help get be a better paying job, I'm just hoping to become the guy that orders American programmers out the door and hires Indians to replace them. :(

      H1B is the biggest red herring EVER. H1B is NOT the problem. It's the offshore outsourcing that is destroying our profession, not H1B. IEEE is incredibly stupid for suggesting that H1B is anything more than a distraction from the real problem.

      BTW: What part of the country are you in? I am from the Midwest...

  11. One quick question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The article falls over itself to heap praise on the Indian IT community (I think it ran out of adjectives eventually), but one particular line stood out to me:

    They are as good at doing all of that as anyone in the world. Perhaps better. And they are cheaper -- on average about 40% cheaper -- than comparable American companies.

    By what metrics are they "As good or better than anyone else in the world"? What ridiculous verbal spewage from someone throwing together a ridiculous little article. The Indian IT industry has gotten attention for one reason and one reason alone: They are very cheap (though the percentage cheaper is steadily declining to the point that it'll be a moot factor), however claiming that they are as good or better than anyone? I'm not being arrogant, but I find that there's a stunning lack of Indian software in the commercial software arena: which would be TRUE proof of homebrew abilities in an arena. Instead the industry is relegated to throwing together post-design highly-redundant type apps for countless life and bank organizations.

    I'm not blindly claiming that India isn't a credible force in the software development force, but so are many other countries: This doomsdayish end-of-the-world attitude of this article just strike me as ridiculous.

    ergo98

    1. Re:One quick question by mgs1000 · · Score: 1
      Well, from a managent point of view, they are the best in the world. I dont know about where you work, but at most places I've had experience with, software quality is a much lower priority to management than cost.

      An the Indians are as good as anybody in the world at making cheap software.

    2. Re:One quick question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be such an idiot. You obviously have no idea of what you're talking about. Try doing some research next time before exposing your ignorance in public.

    3. Re:One quick question by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Uh...okay. I apologize and I hereby accept all gloating praise heaped upon India (a region whose SOLE selling point is low cost). India is our daddy. In fact, I'm going to buy some India shrinkwrapped software right now given the lateral thinking and innovation that naturally must emerge from the streets of Bangalore. Could you point me to some?

    4. Re:One quick question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be such an idiot. You obviously have no idea of what you're talking about. Try doing some research next time before exposing your ignorance in public.

    5. Re:One quick question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fail to understand that there is no difference in intelligence between Indian and western programmers. If the lag behind in quality at the current date, for whatever reasons, rest assured that will change out of necessity. Further, I suspect that a great deal of shrink-wrapped software is written for the native Indian market. From what I've read here and in other sources there are several hundred million Indians living a middle class existence. That is, they have some purchasing power that goes to technology. Finally, perhaps you should consider that more time/work is required for basic survival in such countries. That is the free time that you MAY use to code is not available.

      That's from the top of my head, but it sure as hell makes more sense than the (hateful) drivel you wrote.

    6. Re:One quick question by CutterDeke · · Score: 1
      I think the article addresses both of your questions. The "as good as" is measured through CMM certification. As for the "stunning lack of Indian software", the article points out Indian coders have traditionally been very good at coding someone else's design. Wipro is trying to teach its coders how to design solutions and innovate. Also, Indian companies have had some successes (i-flex, for example).

      Also, remember that some Indian companies are doing product development work for US (or other country) companies. It may be that the software you are using was "Made in India", designed by Indian engineers.

  12. Slightly Offtopic by binner1 · · Score: 1

    I took a business (MIS) course as an elective during my last semester at University. I had a man with a PhD swear up and down that UML was a programming language...of course, he also had some strange ideas about how TCP/IP packets are chopped up for delivery.

    -Ben

    1. Re:Slightly Offtopic by The+Bungi · · Score: 1

      PhD in human fluid processing?

    2. Re:Slightly Offtopic by binner1 · · Score: 1

      Nope, 3 dimensional space reservation!

      -Ben

    3. Re:Slightly Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it's a programming language.
      After all - he's been programmed to believe it.

    4. Re:Slightly Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, TCP/IP packets can be "chopped up". IP packets can be fragmented. Satisfies the term "chopped up" well enough to me. Perhaps that is what he meant?

  13. I thought they were a technology news site? by Rudeboy777 · · Score: 1

    A long article with some stupid errors like saying developers code with UML

    Is it any wonder Pud used Fastcompany as the parody basis for his better site?

    --

    From hell's heart I fstab at /dev/hdc

  14. How could anybody survive without oursourcing. by jvj1 · · Score: 1

    These days I cannot imagine how a company can be compatitive without outsourcing, unless ofcourse they are prevented to do so by law.

    1. Re:How could anybody survive without oursourcing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand how a company can be compatitive at all

  15. Good.. by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    Better they appear in Fast Company than Fucked Company

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  16. UML by sql*kitten · · Score: 5, Insightful

    some stupid errors like saying developers code with UML

    These days you can "program" in UML. The actual underlying code is C++ or Java generated by the CASE tool from your UML diagrams, but it's still programming, just at a higher level. For example, instead of programmatically declaring a member variable of a class, you click on the UML class diagram and add a property, instead of typing class Z extends X you drag a line.

    You usually have to go to real code to actually implement methods, but using a RAD tool to layout your GUI, a CASE tool to do all the object defintions and database connectivity, only writing code by hand when you have to, is a very productive way to work. Programming Swing or Motif or MFC is very repetitive and can be highly automated, as can writing wrapper code for database tables to present them cleanly to objects.

    You'll get a lot of geeks sneering that a text editor is the only way to write code, but that is an obsolete way of working. Computers are built to automate repetitive tasks, and once you've written one form or report by hand to show that you can, doing it again is just a waste of time.

    1. Re:UML by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yay for automatic code generation!

    2. Re:UML by tshak · · Score: 1

      You'll get a lot of geeks sneering that a text editor is the only way to write code, but that is an obsolete way of working.

      But CASE tools are so bloated when they setup your classes, I mean, I can hand code them so much better. Don't you know that we still need to optimise our classes? Take a look at this example:

      UML generated (C#):

      public class Foo : Bar
      {
      public class Foo()
      {
      // ctor logic here
      }
      public override string ToString()
      {
      // method logic here
      }
      }


      Now, the hand coded version of Foo:

      public class Foo : Bar {
      public class Foo() {
      // TODO: Finish Constructor
      }
      public override string ToString() {
      // TODO: Finish ToString Method
      }
      }

      Even in this small example the CASE tool generated 50% more lines of code!!!

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    3. Re:UML by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      yay for automatic code generation!

      Indeed. Where I work, we use an in-house code generation tool to generate database access code based on the schema definition. This generates a complete set of model objects, able to save themselves to and load themselves from a database.

      You have no idea how much time it's saved us in the past, and will continue to save us on future projects. Even assuming the project starts with a fixed set of well defined requirements and the schema can be finalised up front, just saving the time required to write all that code is a God-send. Should the schema change, for whatever reason, adapting to the change (at the model level, at least) is as simple as rerunning the tool to generate a new set of classes.

      It's not perfect, of course - there is the question of how to handle adding functionality to the classes by hand, then needing to regenerate them, amongst others. It's definitely well worth the effort that was put into it, mostly by one programmer who spent less time on it than would have been required for a single project's set of model classes.

    4. Re:UML by richieb · · Score: 1
      For example, instead of programmatically declaring a member variable of a class, you click on the UML class diagram and add a property, instead of typing class Z extends X you drag a line.

      Graphical languages are highly overated. Just look at what you are reading. It's letters, not pictures.

      The demise of "programmers" have been predicted since there were computers. One of the early cries was:

      "You are not going to need programmers with our tool. Instead of knowing all those numbers for computer instructions, you can use human readable symbols like 'ADD' or 'LOAD'. This new fancy tool is called an 'ASSEMBLER' and even managers can use it!"

      --
      ...richie - It is a good day to code.
    5. Re:UML by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      These days you can "program" in UML.

      Yeah, it's called Microsoft Visual Codasyl :-P

    6. Re:UML by int69h · · Score: 1

      ????
      You're handcrafted code is nearly identical to the generated code. Both sample contain the same lines of FUNCTIONAL code. Compilers could care less about nonessential whitespace when they generate a binary.

      Surely you're a troll. No one remotely familiar with programming could be that stupid.

    7. Re:UML by tshak · · Score: 1

      I was making fun of all those silly "no program can write code as optimized as MY CODE!" people... sheeshe!

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
  17. Quality on the Cheap by PackMan97 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perhaps you should read the article closely.

    [blockquote]Six years ago, Fast Company proled a team at Lockheed-Martin that wrote nearly perfect code ( "They Write the Right Stuff," Dec : Jan 1997 ). The team's claim to fame: It was one of only four outts in the world to achieve Level 5 certication from the Software Engineering Institute. Wipro has Level 5 certication in three different categories. It's eye-glazing stuff, but an amazing achievement.

    Such accomplishments conrmed that Wipro's developers weren't just cheap: They were cheap and very, very good. [/quality]

    Trust me, these folks are VERY concerned about their careers and their industry. They are also very concerned about quality.

    Which is why we should be worried. It's why we should strive to produce better code and strive to do it quicker. It's why we should stop reading Slashdot so much and work more.

    Outfits like this are not fly by night charlies that churn out crap, they are some of the best in the world. We (software professionals) will either step up to the plate and hit a home run and prove our worth or we will get run over like textiles and electronic manufacturing.

    1. Re:Quality on the Cheap by ebh · · Score: 1

      I take those claims of CMM-5-ness with a large grain of salt. Not because I think they're lying (since it'd be easy enough to verify with the SEI), but because it may represent only a small fraction of the total business.

      Maybe they've got a few groups that have hit CMM-5, but if I outsource my shopping-cart app to them, will it get built in a CMM-5 shop? Do I even want it to (since CMM-5 entails very expensive process overhead)?

      So what's the alternative? I'd be happy to get CMM-2 plus code reviews, but for all I know their staff consists of the few rocket scientists they put on the CMM-5 gigs, and the rest of us get code monkeys who haven't even made it through "Teach yourself the Windows Login Prompt in 21 Days" yet.

    2. Re:Quality on the Cheap by sql*kitten · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Outfits like this are not fly by night charlies that churn out crap, they are some of the best in the world. We (software professionals) will either step up to the plate and hit a home run and prove our worth or we will get run over like textiles and electronic manufacturing.

      Consulting firms (I used to work for one) have a technique called the bait-and-switch. Here's how it works. You send a team packed with your most experienced technologists and best-dressed MBAs to do the pitch. It's never actually written down anywhere, but you try to convince the mark that these are the people that will be working for them. Then once the deal is signed, you send in a bunch of 22-year-olds on their first real project to do the work, in fact to learn how to do the work, on the mark's dime.

      That's how it is here. Do you seriously think everyone of Wipro's 15,000 developers is as good as the shuttle team, who are no more than a few dozen, handpicked and rigorously trained? No... the CMM5 types will be wheeled out for pitches and soundbites, then quickly shuttled off to the next prospective client.

    3. Re:Quality on the Cheap by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      Trust me, these folks are VERY concerned about their careers and their industry. They are also very concerned about quality.

      Wipro may be. I have been hired to review three Indian outsourcing efforts; they produced garbage. My sample size is small, and I'm sure there are good Indian outsourcing companies. But there sure are bad ones.

      Which is why we should be worried. It's why we should strive to produce better code and strive to do it quicker.

      For those actually serious about this, consider trying the practice of Test-Driven Development. The basic notion is that you write a few lines of test code, and then write the production code that makes it pass. Then do that over and over again, running your whole test suite regularly.

      This improves quality immensely. That's not just because you get a test suite with 100% coverage. It also forces you to design things more simply and carefully, resulting in much better design.

      In my experience, it takes no longer than regular development, as you cut out a lot of debugging time. And you end up with a comprehensive test suite for free.

    4. Re:Quality on the Cheap by Voytek · · Score: 1

      Achieving CMM level 5 does not mean your software is high quality, it means that your software development process is high quality.

      WHY CAN'T YOU PEOPLE REMEMBER THAT?!

      CMM has nothing to do with code quality and everything to do with process maturity and improvement.

    5. Re:Quality on the Cheap by mikers · · Score: 1

      We (software professionals) will either step up to the plate and hit a home run and prove our worth or we will get run over like textiles and electronic manufacturing.

      A couple of things.

      First, the reason these Indian companies want in here is because: this is where the money and markets are. The biggest in the world actually. If they take all our jobs, factories, companies and do everything cheaper... Well... We won't have a market here anymore. So no use worrying about it. When there is no more money or market here why will they be interested in competing with us?

      Besides, if our unemployment creeps up to 20% because all these jobs were moved overseas, programmers make only $4/hour to compete with international companies... You can bet we will see protectionist legislation AND fast! Politicians will be singing a different tune. Fact is, unemployment is low, demand for skilled workers is high and so is their pay. There is incentive to look elsewhere in the world right now. Its not always going to be the case.

      Second, I don't know how much you know about textiles or manufacturing. Some of the best, brightest captialists have tried their hands at manufacturing and textiles here in the late sixties and seventies and they found they could operate, but they just couldn't turn enough of a profit. Of course, that same profit for a textile mill in China or India would be a huge windfall (a), (b) their labor costs over there would be 10% of those here. Of course, manufacturing and textiles are pretty low-tech simple businesses... And you can hardly tell the products that are US and India made appart. Such are commodities.

      So yes, we are in trouble if we do not move forward (stifle innovation). But things change here so fast (and have been) that we are on a whole different level. I can still list many non-commodity items that are still manufactured here because although there is some demand elsewhere in the world, most of the demand is here. These things don't make sense to make elsewhere (like most of the cars GM, Ford, Chrysler make), and can't be made well enough elsewhere besides.

      I don't like these FUD and absolutist/we are all dead/chicken little stories. Crap journalism.

      m

    6. Re:Quality on the Cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked on a project in 2001 with an Indian group that was allegedy CMM-5 certified. With the 'joint-ventures' of 'this' US company with 'company X' from India, for all I know it could have been a Wipro affiliate. On the team there was one really solid guy who was their architect. Not 'untouchable' solid, but solid. He was there through the start of the build phase and then disappeared to points unknown. The rest of the team that I had exposure to were some combination of average, incommunicative, incompetent, lack-luster... generally disappointing. There was a lot of "learn-as-they-go" happening as could be seen by the manner in which development progressed and their desire to insulate us whenever possible from incremental deliverables due to the fact that it "violated their processes". Right. They did write a lot of code - but a lot of it didn't implement the project requirements. Since we were under deadline, management pushed hard on those of us in engineering that hadn't been replaced by our more cost-effective offshore counterparts. We were left to spin gold out of straw.

      Sad part is we could have delivered a better product with fewer people, without the hassle to our customer and without the cost/aggrevation of redoing work. Consequently I'm not sure about that cost-effective part.

      FWIW, CMM level 5 is all about process management. It really doesn't address the qualilty of the delivered product, but rather than the process by which it is produced is measurable, documented, repeatable and refined.

      My two cents.

    7. Re:Quality on the Cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 Insightful. Wish I had mod points.

    8. Re:Quality on the Cheap by irix · · Score: 1

      I'll confirm this one. I used to work for a small software consulting company, and we would sometimes get work from that was supposed to be done by a big consulting company but had been screwed up. Inevitably, this was exactly what had been done - the client had been impressed with the guys in the $5000 suits, but the people doing the coding had no understanding of the design and produced garbage. This obviously did not happen every time, but we were called in to clean up the mess more than once.

      It all stems from the fact that consulting doesn't scale well, no matter what continent you live on.

      --

      Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
    9. Re:Quality on the Cheap by waveman · · Score: 1

      > Perhaps you should read the article closely.

      > ... one of only four outts in the world to achieve Level 5 certication from the Software Engineering Institute...

      > Trust me, these folks are VERY concerned about their careers and their industry. They are also very concerned about quality.

      The trouble with SEI's CMM is that the whole thing is just the opinion of some academics. It is not evidence based. It was developed for the US defence department because they wanted a predictable software development process.

      To some extent it can make the process more predictable, but at a huge cost in paperwork, and it does not make the process efficient or innovative.

      If CMM is so good, why do so few of the top software companies use it? Why is there so little evidence that it works?

      The Indian companies adopted CMM because they were rightly perceived as being low quality suppliers. CMM is being used as a marketing tool to convince the PHBs of this world they they have fixed their quality problems. It is a very bureacratic paper-driven process, well suited to the way many people in India tend to operate.

      Go and look and you will find as I did that there is little or no evidence that CMM is worth even a tinker's cuss.

      Tim Josling

  18. Re:lol... by REBloomfield · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    thank you, i'm aware of that :)

    It was a flippant remark made against the sterotype that we're all fat, wear braces, have pocket protectors, and live with our parents...

    Now, obviously, this isn't negative, but it's amusing when it's true, even inadvertantly.... (and i didn't say i was exempt from any of those categories either :p)

  19. Maybe, maybe not by laetus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The nascent internet industry (yes, it's still very young) as well as application development in general is NOT a mature industry as were textiles.

    Don't be so quick to cede entire industries, writing them off as "discards". India's getting the business for TWO reasons, cheap labor and EDUCATED labor. It's no secret that the American education system is, shall we say, lacking in almost every regard except being flush with funding. We may be losing the industry simply because they are better at it, not just cheaper.

    --

    "We're sorry, but the website you're trying to reach has been disconnected."
    1. Re:Maybe, maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      As someone working for a company that employs over 100 engineers in India I can tell you that the skills of the average engineer there are well below those of any american engineer I have worked with. Stick with the cheap labor argument, because they are lacking in education at this point.

    2. Re:Maybe, maybe not by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's no secret that the American education system is, shall we say, lacking in almost every regard except being flush with funding.

      No. We shall not say that.

      The United States is home to more elite colleges and universities than any other country in the world. Is that a sign of a lacking educational system?

      If you were referring to primary and secondary schooling, public schools in particular, yeah the US school system cranks out a lot of idiots. But this is because most people ARE idiots. While we may not have the best scores of all the first-world nations, we're not THAT far below the rest either.

      I also object to your 'flush with funding' comment. Have you ever met a public school teacher who was sufficiently compensated for the work they do?

    3. Re:Maybe, maybe not by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      If you were referring to primary and secondary schooling, public schools in particular, yeah the US school system cranks out a lot of idiots. But this is because most people ARE idiots. While we may not have the best scores of all the first-world nations, we're not THAT far below the rest either.

      It's actually better than that: our test scores may suck, but our education system works pretty well. First, when you consider the massive diversity in this country (IOW, the class gap), a single score of any kind is misleading. The high education level in middle class and rural ohio is balanced by the blight in the ghettos. In addition to this variety of achievement, we've got to realize that our testing system isn't very good to begin with. Other countries that beat us on test scores, like Japan, are moving away from a strong reliance on the scores. Their main concerns are the high student suicide rate and the inability to tech anything that isn't on the test.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    4. Re:Maybe, maybe not by Flick · · Score: 0

      I too have worked with less experienced engineers based in India, but keep two things in mind:

      1) Within a few years engineers with one or two years of experience today will be hitting the sweet spot of 5-7 years experience and cost less than a new grad in the US.

      2) There is plenty of discussion about the flight of Indian engineering talent home because of the slumping high tech industry here.

      http://www.eetimes.com/story/OEG20010614S0028
      h ttp://www.spectrum.ieee.org/INST/jul02/findia.htm l
      http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/02 _45 /b3807151.htm

    5. Re:Maybe, maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Issaquah school teachers here in Washington were on strike because they only made $43,000 a year (starting, on average.) That's more than I make, and I work more than 7 hours a day, 4 days a week, 9 months a year. And my benefits aren't even half. And I don't have any pension to think of. And there is actually the possibility that I could get fired, or laid off, or not get a raise one year.

    6. Re:Maybe, maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you seen recent standardized tests? You'd score twice as well as you did ten years ago, and that having forgotten all your maths. And grading is a joke. You get a C just for showing up in virtually any class these days. So rich white suburban kids have teachers that go easier on them than poor rural black kids, but they have it pretty easy too.

      Test scores *are* misleading. For one, because the tests are so dumbed-down. Competition between states for the best scores (read: $core$) has assured that. And two, because most kids probly learn more in two days of testing than 180 days of mindless drivel and indoctrination. And five, because they watch British comedy.

    7. Re:Maybe, maybe not by bluFox · · Score: 1
      That probably reflects on the recruiting standards of your firm than on indian engineers as such.
      Please specify the skills which you found lacking,and the kind of Industry you are working on rather than give a very general opinion.
      If you work for a firm that recently shifted to India then you probably need to look closer to why you get below par engineers.
      It might have a lot to do with the work conditions , morale, and culture prevailing in the company and/or the location of your company.
      and perhaps on the recruiting procedure too (ask your HR to find out).

      --
      ~561
    8. Re:Maybe, maybe not by drpatt · · Score: 1
      The United States is home to more elite colleges and universities than any other country in the world. Is that a sign of a lacking educational system?

      True, but it misses the point. Most comments about low educational performance in the US are about high school level and below.

      If you were referring to primary and secondary schooling, public schools in particular, yeah the US school system cranks out a lot of idiots. But this is because most people ARE idiots.

      No, it is because we put control in the hands of NEA educrats who care more about their own little empires and building their budgets than they do about education. Private schools do quite well here. So do charter schools, which are public, but much more independent. Home schools do a great job, also. Look at the typical public school and see the problems: low standards, terrible discipline (entrenched by teachers who cannot enforce order in the classroom because of spoiled and opportunistic parents who sue at the drop of a hat, and school systems that settle out of court just as quickly), and lots of money being siphoned off for the bureaucracy.

      Not to mention pervasive political correctness culture that values teaching kids about proper condom use more than about reading and writing.

      While we may not have the best scores of all the first-world nations, we're not THAT far below the rest either.

      That puts us at the top of the pits. Once, back when kids were educated with 12 grades in a single room (or at home), we were at the top. Some of our kids still are, but most of them are not in the public school system.

      The US is a New World nation. There is an Old World, a New World, and a Third World.

      There never was a First World.

      There never was a low-density floppy, either.

  20. Great. by Bisifiniti · · Score: 3, Funny

    Another couple hundred million people ensuring I'm never going to get a job. I'll just have to work an inane patent on jobhunting, then sue them all on a DMCA technicality.

  21. The Cost of Global Competition by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 4, Interesting
    "More explosions: From Wipro's rooftop, you can see a string of holes blown out of farmland nearby. Wipro is excavating the foundation for an 8-acre third phase of its Electronic City facility,..."

    What ever happened to distance independent work / telecommuting, and so on? That was the Next Big Thing(tm) in the 1990's. Instead, part of this globalization trend seems to be to turn the best farmland into the best business parks. In the U.S., the asphalt of Chicago covers some of the richest farm land in the nation. Places like Sweden have be enthusiasticly paving the Mälar river valley and the plains of Scania. Germany and most other countries are doing the same? It's not possible for every country to import food and certainly not economically feasible (yet) for India to think about it.

    It would be more effective to knock down the Indian variants of the late Cabrini Green -- urban renewal would be good for the people living in the city, and it would keep the programmers closer to the cafés.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
    1. Re:The Cost of Global Competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Telecommuting--it's not that it can't be done. It's that Big Biz (TM) doesn't WANT it to be done.

      We certainly DO have the power to work from just about anywhere. The problem is, I have yet to encounter a single employer that would encourage it...they actively discourage, if not outright forbid, any kind of telecommuting.

      And then there are the psychological problems of telecommuting. When telecommuting is allowed for SOME, the people who don't telecommute develop a deep sense of resentment to the telecommuters.

      Still, all of these issues CAN be dealt with--it's just that industry doesn't want to.

  22. Fred Brooks !!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude's named "Fred Brooks". Not Mel Brooks.

  23. If Wipro is the competition, by overshoot · · Score: 1
    then I'm not worried. $EMPLOYER has worked with Wipro before, and basically all they do is transcribe standards (e.g. the 1394 spec) line-for-line into either HDL or C. The result may be functional, but it's rarely robust or maintainable and never efficient.

    By the time we get the Wipro stuff into marketable form, we've spent more time and effort on it than it would have taken to do the job ourselves from scratch.

    Our people in Bangalore are similar: good people, but pretty much turn-the-crank implementors. I'm glad we have them because so much of our work really is turn-the-crank work, but I'm quite happy making periodic trips to Bangalore to train them while spending most of my time doing Kewl Stuff at home.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  24. What about code auditing by Rossalina+W+Sanchez · · Score: 1
    Who's going to take care of auditing the code you get from a fly-by-night software house in India?

    It's one thing to write code that works but commercial code for real products must be audited for security flaws and must also be maintained for future development. Not a very good long term solution in my mind.

    Perhaps if you need a quick one-time job hacked out and you don't care aboot security then this might be a good solution but otherwise the hidden long term issues make it non-viable solution.

    --

    --Rosie

    1. Re:What about code auditing by Draoi · · Score: 1
      ... a fly-by-night software house in India ... commercial code for real products ... a quick one-time job hacked out ...

      Just how partonising and ill-informed can you get! Just because it's not from the US doesn't make it 'a fly-by-night software house'. There are plenty of US companies that fit this image. Credit where it's due; Indian companies are capable of churning out excellent software & guess what - they can even peer-audit and maintain it themselves! Who'd a thunk, eh?

      That's why they have so many SEI Level 5 compliant organisations. Take a look at this report & count the Indian companies (and, hey, this was compiled in 1999. What's it like now??). Oh, look - Wipro is on the list. Surpriiise!

      --
      Alison

      "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." - Albert Einstein

    2. Re:What about code auditing by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      I think his real point really applied to any outsourcing. If you have a company in the banking sector and you outsource code, it would be absolutely insane not to have an auditing team that goes over the code line by line to ensure that it doesn't introduce backdoors or security holes. This applies whether you've outsourced to India or Accenture. Indeed I would imagine that the auditing field will be a burgeoning new career.

      Another field that is going to explode because of the India phenomena is systems analyst/architect: To have the Indian firms develop for you, generally you have to provide them with a absolutely defined need, and that's where that comes in.

    3. Re:What about code auditing by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
      is systems analyst/architect

      Ewwwww... let's not confuse the two, pleeeez.

      An architect (a real one) is light years ahead of what even the best analyst can do.

    4. Re:What about code auditing by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Sorry I actually did mean to portray them as two separate positions, and indeed a slash indicating role-duality was a mistake. Doh! :-)

  25. Something I've wondered . . . by Badgerman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Considering the conflicts with Pakistan and the past fear of possible nuclear or conventional war in the region, do companies work that into their calculations? What of other kinds of issues in foreign countries that companies outsource to?

    I'd figure foreign outsourcing would bring in a hell of a lot of variables one would have to work with.

    --
    "The Sage treasures Unity and measures all things by it" - Lao Tzu
    1. Re:Something I've wondered . . . by Izeickl · · Score: 1

      This is true, but how about also the high costs of running business in the US, health care, insurance, wages, extreme litigation culture. also the US isnt the most neutral nation in the world, and although has no conflicts directly on its borders, it is still a target, the fact the missile shield is going ahead indicates the Government at least think its in danger of nuclear attack.

      As you say, theres alot of variables to take into account.

    2. Re:Something I've wondered . . . by PaschalNee · · Score: 1

      Considering the conflicts with Pakistan and the past fear of possible nuclear or conventional war in the region, do companies work that into their calculations? What of other kinds of issues in foreign countries that companies outsource to?

      Considering the conflicts with Afghanistan, Iraq, North Korea, Libya, Nigeria, Canada :-), [Insert your favourite] in the past and the fear of possible nuclear or conventional war in the region ..... I'd figure not outsourcing would bring in a hell of a lot of variables one would have to work with.

    3. Re:Something I've wondered . . . by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      Considering the conflicts with Pakistan and the past fear of possible nuclear or conventional war in the region, do companies work that into their calculations? What of other kinds of issues in foreign countries that companies outsource to?

      You know, one of the very interesting things about last year's brinkmanship was what it did to the value of the Indian rupee and to India's forex reserves. Usually, in times of political or economic uncertainity in a certain country, you'd expect a dip in the currency's value; the US dollar, for example, dipped (primarily in relation to the Euro and Swiss franc) after Enron and Worldcom broke out.

      I honestly was expecting the rupee's value to dip in mid-2002; the Monsoons had failed, agricultural produce in a largely agarian economy had taken a plunge, manufacturing was in a largely self-inflicted slump and then there was that dickheaded brinkmanship with Pakistan (dickheaded because it acheived absolutely nothing; Islamist terrorists still attack Indian targets with impunity, people still die in Kashmir and what's more, there seems to be no end in sight to all this violence.)

      But the fact of the matter is, the rupee is still going strong (bad for exports, good for people like me), and, while nowhere near China's, forex levels are at an all time high. Most believe that it's largely due to software exports and by bank remittances by Non Resident Indians.

      Now, it's important to remember the political clout that the software industry has in India's corridors of power. A power that have, on earlier occassions, not shied from wielding; IT companies, for instance, get fabulous tax breaks, get allocated prime land and in general, have direct access to state chief ministers and central (ie federal) ministers. One of the bigger things that affected me a long time back was the IT industry's silence over most central ministers' biligerent statements, statements that would be populist within India but would definitely be seen as provocative in the international community (and hence detrimental to business interests).

      I guess we now know the reason more or less; the IT industry hasn't really been affected by the stand-off. In fact, I'll extend it even further:- tech (whether Indian, American or Tristan-da-Cunha-ian) will flourish despite irresponsible politicians.

      I'd figure foreign outsourcing would bring in a hell of a lot of variables one would have to work with.

      Hope I answered your question.

    4. Re:Something I've wondered . . . by Badgerman · · Score: 1

      Considering the conflicts with Afghanistan, Iraq, North Korea, Libya, Nigeria, Canada :-), [Insert your favourite] in the past and the fear of possible nuclear or conventional war in the region ..... I'd figure not outsourcing would bring in a hell of a lot of variables one would have to work with.

      My figuring is that, in general, "The Devil You Know" is preferable if only for predictability.

      Conflicts with Canada? Damn, we're gonna hear MORE South Park jokes now . . .

      --
      "The Sage treasures Unity and measures all things by it" - Lao Tzu
    5. Re:Something I've wondered . . . by Dingel · · Score: 1

      The nuclear weapons stop any conventional conflict from escalating very much, so unless you've located your business in Kashmir, I think you should be okay.

      --
      ---- Live for Music. Die for Trance.
    6. Re:Something I've wondered . . . by aCC · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. Outsourcing doesn't necessarily mean that you build up your own resources in India. Our mother company outsources for some years to India (and now more and more to China), but they don't own a company there, they just have a partner there.

      So, you can use them for projects when you need time intensive work (and actually their quality is good!). The Indian (or Chinese) partner company wins because they have well paid contracts from outside their country and the mother company wins by being competitive and not having to pay as much as domestic companies.

      (On the other hand the domestic companies that offer the same services lose, but this will always be and if it wasn't, we still wouldn't eat anything other than our local food, wear local clothes, ... and didn't have the living standard we have.)

  26. Why are US IT workers considered slackers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At what point did all US and Canadian IT personnel become slackers?

    I've personally worked with very talented US IT workers who put in the 15-18 hour days, with degrees from quality universities.

    Why is it so "mainstream" to slam US IT workers these days?

    1. Re:Why are US IT workers considered slackers? by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 5, Funny

      Because we're sitting around discussing this on Slashdot...

    2. Re:Why are US IT workers considered slackers? by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Why are 15-18 hour days considered a good thing?

      In europe you'd be told to go home, and possibly be referred to a counsellor if you did that regularly. (in most places)

      It seems that european companies are a touch more interested in the welfare of their employees than U.S. companies that seem to try and screw every last bit of life out theirs.......

    3. Re:Why are US IT workers considered slackers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that, my friend, is why Europe is struggling.

      Sure, people in these countries might think they are better off, they might spend more time with their families, they might think they are living more satisfying lives, they might think they have the material things they need in life even without an SUV and wide screen TV but ... when they are taking their last breath they will know deep in their hearts that these are not the things that really matter. Their time in the spirit world will be spent hoping that their next life on earth will be as an american.

    4. Re:Why are US IT workers considered slackers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They live longer, too, in a society where it is obviously not worth living.

    5. Re:Why are US IT workers considered slackers? by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Keep in mind that a result of Europe's ridiculously over-regulated labor conditions there is a much higher average of unemployment over there vs. the US.

      Having a job is better than not having one. Someday when your social programs are bankrupted due to not enough people having jobs that can create a sustainable tax-base you Europeans will learn that.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    6. Re:Why are US IT workers considered slackers? by twitter · · Score: 1
      Because we're sitting around discussing this on Slashdot...

      Heh! Where else are you going to learn about the free software that will end this latest nightmare addition to the closed software, turn the crank, money waster?

      How many times does a consultant solve the problems of US business, accounting, orders, inventory and all that jazz?

      As many times as you pay him to.

      --

      Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  27. Business 101 by gpinzone · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It seems business folk like to latch onto a tech concept, exaggerate it's claims, then run blindly with it like lemmings to a cliff.

    This recent love of Indian software companies strikes me like the love affair businesses had with the Internet in the late 90s. "We can run our businesses so much cheaper on the Internet!" "Banner ads will pay for all our expenses and then some!" Of course, no one bothered to really ask the question whether or not the Internet was profitable. All they saw were dollar signs and were more than happy to ignore the negative aspects of this new business paradigm. I don't think we're going to have a software "crash" like we did with the dot com bust, but anyone who thinks they can pay a little bit of money and magically get high quality code from the underpants gnomes...er, I mean India, they're going to be disappointed.

    1. Re:Business 101 by NineNine · · Score: 3, Informative

      anyone who thinks they can pay a little bit of money and magically get high quality code from the underpants gnomes...er, I mean India, they're going to be disappointed.


      I only wished that were true. From the article:

      At the same time, Wipro has embraced quality. In six years, it has trained 7,000 employees in Six Sigma and completed 1,000 quality projects. Six years ago, Fast Company proled a team at Lockheed-Martin that wrote nearly perfect code ( "They Write the Right Stuff," Dec : Jan 1997 ). The team's claim to fame: It was one of only four outts in the world to achieve Level 5 certication from the Software Engineering Institute. Wipro has Level 5 certication in three different categories. It's eye-glazing stuff, but an amazing achievement.

    2. Re:Business 101 by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      Wipro has Level 5 certication in three different categories. It's eye-glazing stuff, but an amazing achievement.

      I find it impossible to believe that every one of Wipro's 15,000 developers is capable of writing code to this standard.

      Maybe Wipro have 3 teams of a few dozen or so elite programmers who work on very well-defined long term projects, where the software has one specific job to do and everyone on the team has a decade's worth of familiarity with the codebase. But the rank and file are likely to be about as talented as the rank and file at EDS or CSC.

    3. Re:Business 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Y'know, you're absolutely bang-on. A lot of Indian programmers are very young (and not very experienced) ... in fact Wipro devs got flamed for being clueless n00bs while working on Gnome and Metacity for Sun.

      But the reason Wipro (and a lot of other Indian companies) will succeed is (a) great middle level management and (b) amazing marketing.

      In particular, Wipro (and Infosys and Tata Consultancy) have drones working for them at the bottom. Most of them are fresh non-CS engineers (e.g. Mech or EE, not many Indian CS undergrads who love IT/CS would work at jobs like these) or folk with 2-5 years of experience. Nothing to write home about, nothing to get scared about. Except the numbers. Because we're talking about companies which put together have over 80,000 employees. Out of those, they can easily get amazingly talented middle management (project leads, project managers, practice managers, delivery heads) that's tech savvy and not PHB-like. *This* are their hidden backroom strength.

    4. Re:Business 101 by gpinzone · · Score: 1

      All that means is that they have documented their processes. Their processes could be shit...but they're documented, so they have a level 5. Also, they've documented that they have a means to allow change. That doesn't mean they will actually attempt to improve quality, just that they've documented the methods.

  28. Wake up call by Draoi · · Score: 1
    In America's information economy, we have become comfortable framing our competitive advantage in terms of knowledge and innovation. We justify charging premium prices because we have the best-trained talent delivering top-quality information solutions.

    Oh, c'mon. The writing's been on the wall for over 20 years now. So much 'knowledge' and 'innovation' has originated from Europe and the Far East since then & it's beginning to be noticed in mainstream journals like Fast Company. Those of us in the industry have already known this for years ....

    --
    Alison

    "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." - Albert Einstein

  29. no long-term worries by danger42 · · Score: 1
    From the article:

    Within two years, Wipro says, three-quarters of the employees its customers see will be local nationals: American, European, or Asian.

    This means that any advantage the Indian's have had by being able to compete on price is going to be erased. Then they will just be another EDS or IBM Global Services division.

    --
    -nd
    1. Re:no long-term worries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the article - EDS and IBM are increasingly moving over there too.

    2. Re:no long-term worries by taradfong · · Score: 1

      I think the point was, by hiring enough 'local face people' customers will *interact* with local nationals, but that doesn't mean that the hoards of programmers actually doing the work will be locals.

      --
      Does it hurt to hear them lying? Was this the only world you had?
  30. FYI: In the same issue.... by Jethro+On+Deathrow · · Score: 1

    the more interesting article is about how Carly Fiorina has destroyed (or is destroying) the good name of Hewlett-Packard.

  31. You're right on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must conform here. Groupthinking wins. Challengers lose. The cycle is perpetuated by the groupthinkers being granted karma, leading to mod points and the ability to promote other hippietech conformists. It's gross, and must be changed.

  32. Not surprising by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "The new face of global competition" is nothing innovative, just some really bright people that are being exploited to work long hours for low salaries because they live in an impoverished country.

    Meanwhile they pull down the salaries of professionals working in america, and those lower salaries combined with the ever increasing fear of losing one's job (which is another result of global competition), so professionals decrease their spending and their standard of living and the result is a recession, we may not be able to get out of.

    I am not racist and really like the fact that India is breeding smart hardworking engineers, but wish they were payed decent salaries for their sake and our own sake.

    At least there is one thing that never changes. Fast Company is as always willing to give blowjobs to large corporations. I wonder what the folks at fast company received for thisd article. And i wonder if they are under pressure from third world journalist with no ethical standards.

    1. Re:Not surprising by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      I am not racist and really like the fact that India is breeding smart hardworking engineers, but wish they were payed decent salaries for their sake and our own sake.

      But they are paid decent salaries. Currency works like anything else, supply and demand. Lots of people want dollars, so dollars go up in value relative to other currencies. Or Euros, Sterling, Swiss Francs, Yen, etc. These are the "hard" currencies, because you can use them to do cross border business (among other reasons). You can't use Rupees for this, so the value of Rupees relative to dollars goes down (because Indians are converting Rupees to hard currencies so they can import stuff).

      The effect of this is that in dollar terms, India is very cheap - an Indian on $4/hr doesn't need to work a whole hour to afford a cup of coffee, like an American on the same dollar salary would! The Indians are getting paid in, and spending, their local currency.

      Anyone who claims Indians on $4/hr are getting exploited doesn't know what they are talking about and should be dismissed out of hand.

    2. Re:Not surprising by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      At least there is one thing that never changes. Fast Company is as always willing to give blowjobs to large corporations. I wonder what the folks at fast company received for thisd article. And i wonder if they are under pressure from third world journalist with no ethical standards.

      The article was written by a certain (first-world sounding) Keith H. Hammonds. But yes, I agree; the article is basically advertising for Wipro and yes, corporate-planted stories of this sort are increasing these days.

  33. the US system is flush with funding? by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    what type of crack are you smoking?

    keee-rist...

    the "no child left behind" act is a way to further defund schools, that have been horribly neglected.

    why? republicans like to spend an obscene amount of money on defence, and have no extra money for their constituents.

    --
    ... hi bingo ...
    1. Re:the US system is flush with funding? by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      That's such crap... here in metro Atlanta the cost per student per year is way above average, yet the quality of the education is way below average... outlying counties spend half as much with much better quality in education. Still, overall spending in the state, per student, is quite high while we are ranked 49th out of 50 in grades. All this happened while the state was controlled by DEMOCRATS, and is a major part of the reason why Georgia just swore in a bunch of republicans from the last election. The education in our state went to hell under DEMOCRAT rule. You can't even attribute any of the problems to throwback republican rules, like you might do now with Reagan and Bush senior, as our state hasn't had a republican governer since reconstruction.

      Throwing money at the problem is not the answer, and Bush (and many others) support alternatives (like vouchers). The democrat plan to throw "obscene amount of money" at the school problems has already shown itself to be failure.

      I also suppose you think now is a good time to disarm?

      I don't want to start a democrat vs. republican battle, because I don't completely subscribe to either of those parties philosphies, but statements like yours are just ridiculous.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
  34. Re:lol... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chill it, dude. Guy wasn't ridiculing Indian values, just that the stereotypical white male American geek still stays in his parent's basement even after he's grown bald. :-)

  35. Training our own replacements ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from the article ..."Yeah, it's weird," says a manager from a big U.S. media company sent here to oversee his company's nascent outsourcing operation. "It's like we're training our own replacements."

    Yep. Thanks to Harris Miller who made his mark by globalizing
    agriculture (importing more guest workers) and is
    now applying his nefarious techniques to high tech. No wonder his favorite book is The Prince by Machiavelli.

    Hyper-globalization has failed. It was a radical social experiment that has not brought higher growth rates but has brought higher income dis-equilibrium. The super rich get super richer, the rich get richer, the middle class get more clogged roads, and the poor get poorer.

    It's time to restore our borders and tax this outsourcing crap.

  36. Deflation by xyote · · Score: 1

    A lot this competitiveness is based on differences in cost of living or cost of doing business. Well, after deflation hits the US, $8000 a year is going to look like a good salary to a US programmer.

  37. do i need to point out the obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So,

    Large companies are outsourcing their IT needs to India, and elsewhere.

    Is it just me, or is this a worrying trend? Have we not learned anything as consumers and tech workers that we are simply shooting ourselves in the foot by doing this?

    What about having companies purchase and buy products and services made here (Canada in my case). Should we not choose to employ our fellow workers rather then fill the pockets of a foreign company?

    Geez, no wonder the tech/IT fields are hurting.

    Buy local...

  38. Do you believe what you type? by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

    "employers were loyal to employees"

    In the 80's? Are you for real?

    The myth of the loyal company seems to die hard. People believe it stopped sometime right around when they were born.

    It has never existed; or I should say, if it did, ir probably existed through the 40's and part of the 50's, but that was more out of necessity than any great moral force.

    When I was a kid (in the north), the battle cry was "they're moving all the good jobs to the south!". Who knows if it was true, but certainly, there was never any qualms about moving factories to the cheapest place.

    Nothing new here at all, except a new generation grows up and finds out the world is a little bit harder than it looked when you were a kid.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    1. Re:Do you believe what you type? by anonymousman77 · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe I imagined my father's company keeping him on and not laying anyone off in good times and bad for over 30 years and having less than 10% turnover. Maybe that was something I imagined.

      "finds out the world is a little bit harder than it looked when you were a kid"

      A bit harder? A bit harder? We cannot, I repeat, CANNOT, compete with $8,000/year salary. We will NEVER be able to compete with an $8,000/year salary and I don't want to compete with it.

      Bush wants more people in technology fields, right? Maybe he should take a look at why so many of us are struggling, clawing, fighting our way out of IT and into something more stable, no?

    2. Re:Do you believe what you type? by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying a loyal company never existed, but you're taking your dad's experience and extrapolating that over the entire US economy? Hello? When GM was shutting down all those car plants in the 70's and 80's, do you think it had to do with loyalty or cost? Same as with dozens and hundreds of other large firms. They constantly move jobs to lower costs. They always did, they always will.

      As far as the $8,000 salary you think you're competing against, read the article again and think a bit.

      The $8,000 salary only works as long as the the situation doesn't change. But as these companies get more market share, unless there is an unlimited supply of $8,000 programmers, then the price has to rise. Also, as companies fully comprehend the cost of this outsourced costs, things will begin to fall into place. In any IT project, programming costs are expensive, but not the majority of the cost. Its a portion of the cost and economics say the job of coding will probably change so that programmers will become more effective. The days of teams of 100's of programmers in some major corporation in upstate new york has passed. But the days of programmers who know the business and can make effective decisions to help the business are at hand. You can't do that from across the globe. This is just an example, but guys who only code have been an endangered species for almost 20 years. Guys who can code, understand systems, understand the business and can communicate well will always be in demand and probably for a decent wage.

      Does the trend concern me? Yes, just as the "Cheap/smart Japanese" of the 80's concerned me, or as any number of economic forces concern me. But I don't think its the death of the US or the IT industry in the US. I think it bears watching, but not the kind of hysteria that's going on right now.

      --
      You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    3. Re:Do you believe what you type? by anonymousman77 · · Score: 1

      I wish I shared your optimism. Getting laid off every 6 months or so will do that to a guy. Just wait, you'll stop your free market talk once you realize I'm right!

      I still don't get why people feared the Japanese in the 80s. They didn't work 18 hour days for $6k/year, even in the 80s.

      I read the article again. I still see them saying that top notch guys there still make 40% of what I do here. Their government pays for health care. Ours doesn't! Food, health, and housing are three very important things to me. I can't get all 3 on $8k/year here!

      The problem is that I don't have a solution. The real solution is pain, unemployment, re-schooling (while my wife and children live in squalor), and then hoping for a job outside of IT (where I will most certainly make less than before globalization). Doesn't sound like George's vision of the US where everyone is computer literate and can write code, does it?

  39. Stupid limey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just because you live in a borderline country where most of you can't afford a house or decent car is no reason to attack us.

    1. Re:Stupid limey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because you live in a borderline country where most of you can't afford a house or decent car is no reason to attack us.


      I live in the United States in the rust belt. I have seen a pile of good, honest, hardworking folks lose their jobs to Mexico, various places in Asia, etc. They simply were unable to be productive enough to cover the cost differences between having their jobs in the US versus having them shipped out.

      Guess what, tech workers of the world? You are in the same boat. Is Silicon Valley the next Flint, Michigan? I guess we'll find out.

  40. It is all about money, but where is the developers by tstiehm · · Score: 1
    Premji's story is near legend in India, largely because with a fortune estimated at $6 billion, he is by far the nation's wealthiest individual.
    Here is the problem; developers making $8k a year aren't going to work for $8k a year forever when the CEO is worth $6B. Bill Gates knew this and MS made more millionaires than any other company in history. The Robber Barron business model doesn't work on knowledge workers forever since knowledge workers are educated and even in India are scarce resource.

    Hungry developers and consultants are hungry for money for themselves and not for the CEO. Hungry Indian IT workers don't want to be wealthy but Indian standards, they want to be wealthy by world standards. Sure there are still a good number of years of growth but in the end, $8k a year per developers isn't going to last.

  41. Cooking oil and PCs by krygny · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of a commercial a few years back about some 'Engulf and Devour' type conglomerate board meeting:

    "Should we make salsa or oven mits?"

    --
    Research shows that 67% of those who use the term "research shows", are just making shit up.
  42. Economics at work by abhikhurana · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Firstly, I am in Indian but I dont work in India. Now to the crux of the matter. Its trur that Wipro is a great company. Infact during the peak days of dotcom boom, its chairman, Azim Premji was the second richest person in the world just behind Bill G. Wipro does have many good engineers like most big Indian software companies. But if you look at the salary of the guy, around 21000 USD, its not that low. Thats how the global economy works I assume. Eventually skilled people from poor countries get richer and to retain them the corporations have to pay more, and so the cost edge reduces gradually. Thats gonna happen with India as well, sooner or later. The only thing which is stopping this from happening is that India has a population of 1 billion, so we obviously have more skilled people as well, but still we have seen a gradual increase in the pay in IT industry and I dont think this trend is gonna stop. So eventually the competition between India and the rest will not be on price but on quality. Even my present company outsources work to India but again we feel that the quality of the work is not very good. But we can't go to a big company as it disturbs our budget calculations. But even then, now the consensus is emrging that we should give some work to a big Indian company. In future this cud be any company in the world.

  43. This is coming from a person by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...who probably believes telnet is "too hard" and that GUI's are the only way to accomplish stuff.

    I run into people like you all the time. Blindly throwing around TCO and then failing to admit that you really don't know the first thing about computers.

    Oh, you might have a job in the IT industry; you might even do something marginally technical.

    But if the GUI tools went away, you'd sit in a corner and cry.

    I guess its our fault for not raising the bar higher to "experts".

  44. stupid errors? by ThinWhiteDuke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    with some stupid errors like saying developers code with UML

    Uninformed errors, maybe. Or blatant, significant, major errors. Whatever. But why stupid? Do you really need to be arrogant and insulting? Yet another "1337" syndrom, I guess. Sigh...

    Repeat after me 50 times, I'll put it in a language you can understand :
    Knowledge!=Intelligence
    Ignorance!=Stupidity

    --

    It would be nice to be sure of anything the way some people are of everything.
  45. Obsolete my ass by varjag · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You'll get a lot of geeks sneering that a text editor is the only way to write code, but that is an obsolete way of working.

    For anything but GUI drawing, good old text editors still beat all these point-and-click thingy.

    Writing and adjusting your code is faster with text editor (unless you type with two fingers).

    Non-boilerplate coding can't be done with point-and-click interface, be it UML, RAD or whatelse. Programming is not about changing superclasses and adding member variables: at some point you have to implement actual algorithms. At this point you have to resort to text editor and all the glory of CASE tools fades, since when you actually do want to change superclass you have to move your hands off the keyboard to mouse, swith to different window, and often you are not allowed to change CASE-tool-controlled parts of code by hand. I've yet to see any evidence that a CASE user beats competent developer with editor in terms of performance.

    Those thinking of pointy-clicky interfaces being a magic wand should go and try writing bubblesort with mouse.

    --
    Lisp is the Tengwar of programming languages.
    1. Re:Obsolete my ass by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      Those thinking of pointy-clicky interfaces being a magic wand should go and try writing bubblesort with mouse.

      Why would you want to? No-one in the real world ever writes a sorting algorithm. If you want it sorted, add ORDER BY to your SQL and you're done. 90% of software development is about getting data into and out of databases in different ways, and doing some processing on it along the way. The complexity is not in the code itself, it's in the real-world problem the code is written to solve.

      You're right that non-boilerplate code can't be automated, but the amount of work that is non-boilerplate is relatively small, particularly in terms of lines of code. I've written apps that maybe 60% were pure GUI code, just creating widgets and adding them to forms, etc. Maybe 30% more is just the initialization, connect to DB, open files stuff that's the same between most apps, just calls to libraries. That leaves 10% new code. Using RAD and CASE and c'n'p reduces development time to a fraction.

    2. Re:Obsolete my ass by varjag · · Score: 1

      If you want it sorted, add ORDER BY to your SQL and you're done.

      I don't have an RDBMS on my Palm, yet it somehow manages to sort my records. Magic happens?

      I've written apps that maybe 60% were pure GUI code, just creating widgets and adding them to forms, etc.

      I've written such applications too. OTOH, I was lucky to participate in projects doing things that were hardly ever done before, let alone mainstreamed, so noone made Wizards, invented Patterns and wrote Libraries that we could reuse for that kind of work.

      If all you do is glueing GUIs for DBs - fine. World needs this kind of work. But people around you write GIS, mobile applications, distributed systems and ORDER BY functions for your favorite DBMS.

      Don't overgeneralize.

      --
      Lisp is the Tengwar of programming languages.
    3. Re:Obsolete my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't overgeneralize.

      Actually, *YOU* were overgeneralizing too. sql*kitten wrote:

      "You'll get a lot of geeks sneering that a text editor is the only way to write code, but that is an obsolete way of thinking."

      Saying that [thinking a text editor is the only way to write code] is obsolete. That doesn't seem very general to me. This person is simply implying that another way of thinking has entered the arena. You then said:

      "For anything but GUI drawing, good old text editors still beat all these point-and-click thingy."

      Which sql*kitten proved wrong by demonstrating the issue of, as you put it, attaching widgets to databases. And I think we all know there are more applications besides GUI drawing.

      Just because someone advocates another way of doing things, doesn't mean he/she is advocating it as the ONLY way of doing things. Different technologies for different goals.

  46. shoe shop by Want+Some+Shoes · · Score: 0

    These shoes are made for walking
    And thats what they're gonna do
    One of these days these shoes are gonna walk all over you!

    With that in mind, do you want some shoes?

    --

    Want some shoes?

  47. Re:UML-Binary size. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Even in this small example the CASE tool generated 50% more lines of code!!!"

    But! The real thing to look at is binary size.
    Our compilers have gotten more efficient over the years, so the source code may be bigger, but the binary stays about the same, or smaller.

  48. Just from personal experience by DrFrasierCrane · · Score: 1

    You tend to get what you paid for. In particular, I've been with companies that have outsourced work to Wipro, and that experience was not a good one. Obviously, mine is just one experience, and their success to-date must mean that they're doing at least something right. Still, I have found that, if you're working in the US at least, you can find the right people here at home without the logistical nightmares of working with companies 12 time zones away.

    --
    You call this a signature?
  49. I hope they don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope people who do this get their sorry asses burned (sorry) when then next Indian-Pakistan war starts, because those boys will be playing with nukes.

    And when that happens, my hourly rates are going through the roof. Particularly for companies who outsourced to India.

    It is gonna be sweeeeeeeet.

  50. Old story: remember Ed Yourdon? by ChrisWong · · Score: 1

    Remember Edward Yourdon's "The Decline and Fall of the American Programmer"? That was years ago, but it covered the same topic. Yourdon opened his book with an alarming chapter that fits the title, but at the end of the book he concluded that India is not a threat. It was in part because the demand for software work is so high that even India's universities cannot keep up. Later, he followed up with "The Rise and Resurrection of the American Programmer". Go figure.

    1. Re:Old story: remember Ed Yourdon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was that last article before or after the dotcom bust?

  51. Oh Pete, you're so silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Those of us in the industry have already known this for years ...."

    What industry would that be, Petey.

    In entire IT industry was developed in England and the US.

    The only thing India has brought to the table are underqualified programmers who think SEI certification guarantees results.

    You live in a fantasy world Petey, and I'm not going to disturb it, but rather enjoy it.

    You're welcome!

  52. Oracle moved Corp accounting to India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's not just IT . Any knowledge work that does not require geographic proximity cna and will move to India. Welcome to the global economy.

  53. SPREAD THE WORD, DON'T MAJOR IN CS, JOBS - INDIA by SuperMario666 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm a senior in CS at UAH and I've already disuaded at least three or four people from majoring in Computer Science. "Yeah buddy, all the jobs are headed to India, General Business, Accounting, Management, that's the ticket." Less competition for me in a few years :)

  54. Thats pretty easy to explain by abhikhurana · · Score: 1

    "'m not being arrogant, but I find that there's a stunning lack of Indian software in the commercial software arena: which would be TRUE proof of homebrew abilities in an arena." Well, Indian software industry is mostly active in services business and not in the products. As far as a shunning lack of commericial software, you would be surprised how many commercial softwares contain software from Indian companies, and for that matter how many embedded devices that you use have software from Indian companies. I know that my first company sold the bluetooth protocol stack to a pretty big laptop manufacturer and now they use the stack in all their bluetooth products.

  55. Re:It is all about money, but where is the develop by taradfong · · Score: 1

    I want to agree with you, but over there there's a big vacuum of poverty that will absorb decent pay for a long time before major wealth envy sets in.

    --
    Does it hurt to hear them lying? Was this the only world you had?
  56. Re:Obsolete my ass-Building blocks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Step away from the tree, with your hands up!
    Now presently your correct. Expertise will not disappear. However things WILL change. Compare say the process of building a building. I don't think anyone would say that an architect isn't creative, and that a modern building does have some custom components to it. But it also has a lot of standard parts in it as well. It also has well defined steps, as well as standards that must be met. Software development is headed that way. A LOT of programming is repetitive. How many times have you programmed the same (with minor variations) algorithm? How much code out there is truely original? Even unique buildings, and unique gadgets are composed of standard parts. The CASE tool user not being in the same league as a developer with editor speaks more of the presently primative state the development process is in, than anything else.

  57. Cause for Standard of Living to Fall? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if this has anything to do with this?

    The follow URLS point to the decline of the empire... How low can it go, before people realize what's happening to them.

    http://www.census.gov/hhes/income/incineq/p60204 /f ig1.html

    http://www.panix.com/~dhenwood/Gini_supplement.h tm l

  58. MOD PARENT DOWN by driverEight · · Score: 1

    This is a known Troll. Won't someone, for the love of god, MOD THE PARENT DOWN. What he is saying makes no sense.

    --

    It's not the size of your .sig that matters, it's how you use it.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      I remember when I was a newbie I would say crap like this ... then I actually got some Mod Points and realized : hey, mods can actually read, and will actually mod posts up and down on their merits.

      Contribute to the conversation in a positive manner.
      Get some mod points.
      Actually do some article mod'ing.
      Realize how goofy the folks that post MOD PARENT DOWN really look (this means you.)

      If anything I shoulda modded you down, bagged and tagged your trolling flaimbaiting ass - but I replied instead. Mods can do that, ya know.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  59. Japan did steal autos, consumer electronics by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 1

    Yes Japan is mired in a deep recession, but Japanese companies sell the top-selling sedan in America and dominate consumer electronics.

  60. assembly line vs. individual craftsmen by SuperMario666 · · Score: 1

    Chant no more your old rhymes about bold Robin Hood, His feats I but little admire I will sing the Atchievements of General Ludd Now the Hero of Nottinghamshire Brave Ludd was to measures of violence unused Till his sufferings became so severe That at last to defend his own Interest he rous'd And for the great work did prepare Now by force unsubdued, and by threats undismay'd Death itself can't his ardour repress The presence of Armies can't make him afraid Nor impede his career of success Whilst the news of his conquests is spread far and near How his Enemies take the alarm His courage, his fortitude, strikes them with fear For they dread his Omnipotent Arm! The guilty may fear, but no vengeance he aims At [the] honest man's life or Estate His wrath is entirely confined to wide frames And to those that old prices abate These Engines of mischief were sentenced to die By unanimous vote of the Trade And Ludd who can all opposition defy Was the grand Executioner made And when in the work of destruction employed He himself to no method confines By fire and by water he gets them destroyed For the Elements aid his designs Whether guarded by Soldiers along the Highway Or closely secured in the room He shivers them up both by night and by day And nothing can soften their doom He may censure great Ludd's disrespect for the Laws Who ne'er for a moment reflects That foul Imposition alone was the cause Which produced these unhappy effects Let the haughty no longer the humble oppress Then shall Ludd sheath his conquering Sword His grievances instantly meet with redress Then peace will be quickly restored Let the wise and the great lend their aid and advice Nor e'er their assistance withdraw Till full fashioned work at the old fashioned price Is established by Custom and Law Then the Trade when this arduous contest is o'er Shall raise in full splendour its head And colting and cutting and squaring no more Shall deprive honest workmen of bread.

    Not that I expect you to actually get the reference. It would appear to me to be deja vu all over again.

  61. Always be a moving target by DownTheLongRoad · · Score: 1

    If your company can get someone to do your job for much less than you make, you will lose your job. In the end, it really is just that simple. I've always done my best to stay flexible and not get pinned down to where I depend on a single job and have no other options. Having worked with plenty of engineers and programmers who were getting near retirement age, I learned their lesson without having to suffer their pain. When a company knows they can push you around and you won't or can't leave, you're doomed to be treated like trash. With a BS in Engineering, I took a year long program in C++ and UNIX to switch fields and now I am finishing my MBA to switch fields again. Financial planning pays very well, has good hours and Joe six-pack doesn't want to talk to someone in India or China about their future finances, they want to go to an office down the street for a cup of coffee and a chat about their portfolio. People can make all the anti-capitalist/business comments they please but my strategy is to live well and provide for my family, not be a keyboard slave for an incompetent manager.

  62. Can Anyone Point To Any Success With This? by occamboy · · Score: 1
    Can anyone share a single success story where software was ousourced overseas?

    I've been watching companies outsource to India and elsewhere for years. Every single episode has been a flaming catastrophe, yielding unusable product and hideous code.

    The funniest instance was when a friend's team at Anderson Consulting (now Accenture) outsourced to India -- outsourcee outsourcing to an outsourcee, 2 layers of bad abstraction Total mess, complete garbage delivered, even by Anderson's standards it had to be rewritten.

    The problem is not, I think, that people overseas are dumber than people in the US. The problem is that outsourcing is bad, for many reasons, including differences in motivation between outsourcer and outsourcee, and loss of control. Overseas outsourcing can mean an astonishing lack of control, and a long, long link between the ultimate customers and the coders, which invites mayhem.

  63. I did some work for Birlasoft at GE by mattc58 · · Score: 1

    Never again. Never again. And I tell you, I don't feel so worried now that I've worked with these Indian firms and Indian developers. Not worried at all over the long term.

  64. Comparing to Japan by Kallahar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Before Japan started making cheap cars, their economy was similar to India's. They weren't a high-tech nation, and the Yen was very poor compared to the dollar. Then the figured out how to make cars, and how to sell them to the comparatively rich Americans. They found that even charging large amounts (taking into account the Yen/Dollar exchange) for their cars they could still attract buyers, and pay their workers well. Lo and behold, given time the value of the Yen went up due to all the money being dumped into their economy. As the relative value went up, the profit margins went down, and now Japan has been in a recession for the last 12 years.

    Now, apply that model to India. What we'll see is a mad rush where everyone tries to save money by outsourcing projects to India. The US companies will see huge savings (I disagree, but that's a different argument) and the Indians will see huge profits (again taking the exchange rate into consideration). However as the Indian rupee gains in value, the economic attraction of other countries to outsource to India will fall.

    Hence, the economy is constantly balancing itself.

    This lesson brought to you by Travis

    1. Re:Comparing to Japan by benzapp · · Score: 1

      Before Japan started making cheap cars, their economy was similar to India's.

      I hear this quite a bit. But this is ABSOLUTELY FALSE. Do you really think India would have a chance against the US military and our economy backing it? Absolutely not. Japan however DID, in fact they inflicted more casualties than any other foreign enemy.

      The fact is Japan WAS a high tech nation and has been for 100 years. Japan sided with Germany during WWII not just because they both hated Russia but because the Japanese sent all their leaders to Germany for school. Japan had a corporate-fascist state of the same type as Germany, and had the industrial output to match it.

      Yen was very poor compared to the dollar.

      Of course it was, you have a country that constantly inflates its currency for 50 years and that will happen.

      As the relative value went up, the profit margins went down, and now Japan has been in a recession for the last 12 years.

      Your entire explanation is simplistic at best. The Japanese recession more than anything else is an example of how the pseudo-science of economics is a farce. There is no explanation taking into account any of the statistics and measurements to which you allude. According to the supposed greatest minds in economics of the 20th century, Japan should be a paradise.

      But its not.

      They are a failure because their people are disillusioned and have no interest in perpetuating a hierarchical economy when they get nothing in return. This, more than anything else, is what is happening around the world. While communism requires enslavement to perpetuate itself, fascist command economy require deception. Contrary to what the social engineers think, people are NOT stupid. The game is up, and most people in the world are not going to play anymore.

      Now, apply that model to India. What we'll see is a mad rush where everyone tries to save money by outsourcing projects to India. The US companies will see huge savings (I disagree, but that's a different argument) and the Indians will see huge profits (again taking the exchange rate into consideration). However as the Indian rupee gains in value, the economic attraction of other countries to outsource to India will fall.

      As previously stated, people are in reality quite intelligent. You can outsource programming work because well, anyone can do it. So you might as well pay people as little as possible.

      The reason it works in India is a little more complicated. What you don't know is that the system by which command economies work, mass indoctrination of the people for specific functions, was practically invented in India. Its called the caste system. Why do you think Hitler was so fond of the Aryans in India? They were the Brahmin class, the ones at the top.

      Basically, modern business is based on this hierarchical model of social organization. This sort of system when it involves business is called Fascist, or Corporate-fascist since it was utilized by Germany and Japan to organize their "empires". Its a system which began around the same time in India and Sparta, nearly three thousand years ago. There is a huge collection of people in India born, bred, and trained to serve in the same fashion as the Japanese and modern Americans as a result of forced schooling and college.

      What no one realizes however is comprehensive systems of social organization DESTROYS a people rather than improves them. America's vast wealth was created because we were once free. When public schooling, and every other tool of social control was put in place, the country declined. We were living off the 19th century's wealth for most of the 20th. Now its gone, our people can't function within the bureaucratic machine system because we don't enslave them quite like other nations.

      So then the torch passed to Japan. There, families don't even really exist. Kids spend all their waking moments in school, and school to work legislation makes sure they are moved into the appropriate places in life. But that society has decayed as a result.

      And now we are back to India, where it all began. They learned something that Japan and the West gave up on, Religion is the key to control. Hinduism practically evolved to fill this role. It is still a major component of Indian life, and one the west still doesn't understand.

      There is a reason there are so many "other" religions in India (Sihks, Janes, muslims...) Sihkism evolved SPECIFICALLY to comabt the social order that Hinduism maintained.

      The International Atheist Association is based in India.

      So the point is these countries are not these impoverished backwards places that the wonder of capitalism is transforming. India is just one step in the collapse of internationl bureaucratic business. Capitalism is irrelevant, and will always live on. But the monster of social engineering is just trying to find a new home. It has nearly destroyed American and Japan, now it is going home.

      This lesson brought to you by Travis

      You know, I have always hated that name Travis. Why is it every fuck named Travis is sanctimonious prick? I will tell you why, because only fucked up parents name their kids Travis and raise them so they feel superior to everyone else in the world. So my advice to you Travis, hide your name. In fact, legally change it.

      Oh and you are deluding yourself about your teaching abilities. You have nothing to teach. Go back to your bullshit Macroeconomics textbook. We have all read them before and don't need another tool spouting that shit.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
  65. What Doesn't Kill You... by taradfong · · Score: 1

    ...makes you stronger. Our country typically makes its mark with innovation. Then the Japanese perfect what we do, the Europeans do it with style for a premium price, then the rest of Asia makes it out of plastic for $0.10.

    We therefore cannot stop. I see this trend of outsourcing as a cattle prod to create something which indeed only my talents can accomplish (for now) or which at least gives me a few years of lead time.

    Corporate America reacts to what tries to kill it. Part of the reason they scramble to outsource everything *is to keep alive* in the face of hostile unions, oppressive taxes, lawsuits and health care costs. Thus they hire people that adapt to our current climate, who in turn lead their companies to Enron-dom. Thomas Edison is the *last* person you'd see running GE today...

    Also, what can kill others makes you stronger. Our country's military and ability to bail people out gives us political and therefore economic advantages. People lucky enough to live in America enjoy this advantage.

    --
    Does it hurt to hear them lying? Was this the only world you had?
  66. Classic xenophobic argument by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 1
    Yes, of course, everyone outside of the United States is stupid and lazy...if they weren't, they would be making more than US workers, right?

    Classic xenophobia cannot deflect the brutal truth: foreign companies are producing equal quality for less cost.

  67. Canada - The Better Choice Upstairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm actually 100% serious here for those short-sighted thoughtless managers who really feel that gutting their organization is their only hope.

    Comparison

    Canada - Approximately 40% less expensive than development in the United States

    India - Approximately 40% less expensive than development in the United States

    Canada - Worldclass education system that spans the entire population

    India - Spotty and poor coverage education system that is for the wealthy

    Canada - 18.5 million phones for a population of 30 million. Excellent telephone infrastructure that was the world's first (in concert with the system in the US)

    India - 27.7 million phones for a population of 1,045 million people.

    Canada - One of the world's best data backbones and data distribution throughout the entire country. Data is cheap.

    India - Data coverage is spotty at best, and requires global spanning for things like video conferencing. Most connections require traversing multiple data carriers (whereas between most Canadian centers and American centers is a single carrier)

    Canada - Stable, peaceful nation with natural geographical protection.

    India - Could be in a nuclear conflict with Pakistan tomorrow.

    Canada - One of the world's least corrupt criminal and political systems.

    India - Horrendously corrupt political and criminal systems. Maybe your big development center will be shut down because your competitor paid several thousand rupies to a politician.

    Canada - Buys almost entirely from the US, meaning that every dollar spent here generally goes right back to the US.

    India - Buys very little from the US, and most dollars that go to India go there to build a competitor that my, ironically, eventually put companies like Oracle and Sun out of business. These companies are basically sponsoring their own demise.

    I won't even both comparing as there is no comparison . The only reason why anyone would even imagine going to India today is because it's the big thing they read about in articles like this. The reality, though, is that Canada is a better choice both from a moral choice, but DEFINITELY from a practical choice.

    1. Re:Canada - The Better Choice Upstairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Canada - Buys almost entirely from the US, meaning that every dollar spent here generally goes right back to the US. " ...and that's why we have a giant trade deficit even with Canada?!?!?!

    2. Re:Canada - The Better Choice Upstairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a trade deficit, but the "giant" should be compared against the fact that US->Canada trade is absolutely monstrous (we are already far more integrated for trade than the EU dreams of being). In any case, from the CIA World Factbook regarding imports

      Canada - US 74%, EU 9%, Japan 3% (2000)

      India - Benelux 8.5%, US 8%, UK 6.2%, Japan 5.7%, Saudi Arabia 4.6% (2000)

      A dollar to Canada is basically $0.74 back to the US (simplifying trade a bit), whereas a dollar to India is $0.08 back to the US, and 4.6 cents to that great terrorist fiscally backing state Saudi Arabia.

    3. Re:Canada - The Better Choice Upstairs by slickwillie · · Score: 1

      India - Horrendously corrupt political and criminal systems. Maybe your big development center will be shut down because your competitor paid several thousand rupies to a politician.

      India - Buys very little from the US, and most dollars that go to India go there to build a competitor that my, ironically, eventually put companies like Oracle and Sun out of business. These companies are basically sponsoring their own demise.


      Yeah, outsource your software development to India and pretty soon there is a competing product from ... India.

      Now try to enforce you contract.

    4. Re:Canada - The Better Choice Upstairs by chi-heng · · Score: 1
      The only reason why anyone would even imagine going to India today is because it's the big thing they read about in articles like this.

      You are missing the whole point of this article...The true reason companies outsourcing in India is not only the cheaper labor, India have smarter engineers who can complete the jobs faster and possibly better.

    5. Re:Canada - The Better Choice Upstairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      India have smarter engineers who can complete the jobs faster and possibly better

      Bullshit: India has never been sold as a great source of high quality engineering -> It is all about saving a buck. Everytime a company talks about doing development in India, the reasoning is price savings, never because of the great engineering talent in India. Having said that I'm sure there are smart people in India, but India isn't to software like Japan was to robotics and cars: India is more like a "Korea of automobiles" (see the Hyundai Pony).

      So to respond to "Faster" and "Better" I'd say that's pure bullshit with zero empirical evidence. Indeed, anecdotally I've heard exactly the opposite, and that most implementations that were farmed out to India were an absolute disaster that in the end saved noting.

    6. Re:Canada - The Better Choice Upstairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a sidenote, I find the statement that India has smarter engineers (presumably than the United States and Canada) hilarious. Why don't you point out some of those great engineering feats that the Indian computing industry has blessed the world with, rather than implementing the easiest-of-the-easy software development that is farmed to them (because the only software that CAN be farmed out is trivial software - Software that can be simplified to a UML diagram). The reality is that there is none. If it makes you puff your chest to think of Indian supremecy, realize that the only reason Indian is considered is the third world wages, and the article itself talks about that big Indian firm now looking at even worse off countries to make sure the pricing can be kept so lowballed.

    7. Re:Canada - The Better Choice Upstairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Where do I sign up? Do they take immigrants from the US?

      F the US. They are fucking programmers.

  68. Like a plane flying into your office tower??? by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 1

    There is risk everywhere. How many Indian business parks have been the target of jetliner-missiles?

    1. Re:Like a plane flying into your office tower??? by Dasein · · Score: 1

      Smoking kills about 420,000 Americans eachs year. The 9/11 attackers were pussies they only got about 3,000.

      Americans commit suicide at about a 30,000 a year rate. The 9/11 attackers should just leave it to the professionals.

      About 16,000 murders take place in America a year. Jeeze -- Only 3,000. These guys need to get their act together.

      Now compare that with what a full-out nuclear exchange would do to India and Pakastan. This shows about 1.7 Million dead in India and another 1.8 Million dead in Pakistan.

      All I ask is that you switch on your brain.

      --
      You are not a beautiful or unique snowflake -- but you could be if you got off your ass.
    2. Re:Like a plane flying into your office tower??? by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 1

      Yes, but its also about financial impact. What was the total cost of 9/11 ? Maybe in the tens of billions at the very minimum in property damage alone. Add in a massive market plummet resulting, wiping out billions in equity. Add in lost time and labor, and employees who cannot rise from the dead, gutting entire firms.

  69. Finally by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    I know this proess of outsourcing has already begun but finally its hitting full steam. At long last the arrogant and formerly overpaid techies with arrested social development are getting their comeuppance and how!

    No more latte sipping, all black wearing "consultants" pulling in $300/hour. And never again for that matter. The profits shall now go back to the shareholders and executives where they belong!

    Now all we have to do is repeat the process for the BioTech industry and enjoy the next boom it will bring us! Then we get to watch as THOSE jobs are exported to Indians who played with chemistry sets all day after school while they were growing up.

    After the BioTech Boom/Bust cycle there will be a prolonged global recession that will only be ended when the world's final Boom/Bust scenario begins, the Second Space Race.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    1. Re:Finally by oogoody · · Score: 1

      The knowledge to be in biotech is much
      higher than for computer science. Even
      fewer people are capable of working this
      area. Each new boom requires more and more
      knowledge which makes for fewer and fewer
      workers.

  70. Exactly... by ryman · · Score: 1

    I work here in the States for the financial services arm of the first company you mentioned. The writer failed to point out how many companies aren't just outsourcing to India, they're actually setting up their own branches there. If my co-workers have a computer problem, they have to spend half an hour on the phone with the company's (I'm trying to avoid mentioning the name explicitly) main IT staff in India (until they figure out, like they've been told repeatedly, that it can't be fixed remotely), file an IT case, and then one of our on-site IT staff is sent to the rescue. Unbelievable.

    --
    "We are far too easily pleased." --C.S. Lewis
  71. USCM (freaking out) "That's IT, man, Game OVER!" by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

    Hey, guys:

    Here is what I think is going to happen:

    First, the outsourcing trend is going to worsen. Corporate America is going to increasingly ship its IT work overseas to companies like Wipro. Mostly this is because corporate America is greedy, short-sighted, and fairly stupid, and has absolutely no problem with skewering the economy and destroying the middle class if they can squeeze a little more profit out of the system in the short term. India, which seems fairly pragmatic and which wants to improve its position, will capitalize on this and take all the work given it. This doesn't make India evil; the SITUATION is pretty rotten for the US though.

    The result of this is that the U.S. IT industry is going to be gutted. As companies discover that outsourcing works, they'll outsource other jobs as well, including that of the managers who fired all the IT staff. Why have IT staff in India and not managers? Move everyone offshore except the executive, sales, and client-service staff. Hell, even some of those can go -- India is already the site of several call centers.

    As a result of this trend, which will accelerate over time, the only jobs available in the US that pay well will be for executives and support staff. The only corporate IT that's going to be done in the US is going to be low-level tech support (for the executives) and some consulting (for network setup at a new location, etc). The consulting will mostly be done by -- you guessed it -- Indian representiatives of consulting firms. There may be a few Americans left, who suck it up and take the low salaries. Who knows?

    There will still be a middle class, it'll just be a lot smaller. They'll be people who do things that you just can't outsource. Mechanics. Plumbers. Electricians and carpenters. Cops and Firemen. They'll be local, and they'll serve their communities. Computer repairmen might make a living doing house calls. You might be able to make some money setting up home networks and such. Government will still be strong, and lots of programmers (and a whole variety of other white-collar workers) will work at the county, state, or federal level. And, of course there's always academia, if you can stand all the backstabbing and infighting. The middle class will get a lot smaller, but it'll still be there.

    The majority of people will be working class, either in retail or some sort of support function, like security or building maintenance. The economy will shrink, possibly a lot, and prices will fall because of this. Some communities will be hit harder than others.

    I don't think it'll be a total disaster, it'll just be a change. Local economies will be more visible, people will be more connected to their community as a result (because jobs won't be for companies anymore, but local businesses).

    I'm still not sure how I feel about all this, but I'm pretty sure this is what's going to happen. As for me, I'm staying in government, and I'm going to try and build some kind of side business doing consulting for regular joes and small businesses. Local, small, and comfortable. No worry about outsourcing there...

    Just my $.02...

    --
    Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
  72. According to this article..... by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    ....Wipro's developers follow Six Sigma practices.

    That means they are high quality developers at bargain prices. Not just dollar an hour coders who don't know what they are doing.

    Does anyone have a clue as to how American or other Western programmers are supposed to compete with this?

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  73. Key Point - 'Other American Companies'.. by WittyName · · Score: 1

    They are positioning to take on Accenture, EDS, Andersen, etc.

    These companies have too many MBA's with nice haircuts.. Nothing ever gets done, except for more analyses and ass covering.

    When one of them finally starts to attempt actual implementation, they try to fill your building with more of the parasites.

    If this is WIPRO's model, we have little to fear.

    Also, 40% cheaper than Accenture or EDS still leaves us with some FAT profits, IF we can get our proposals heard by upper management.

    --
    The law is a weapon of the government, not a protection for the likes of you. Surely you understand that.
    1. Re:Key Point - 'Other American Companies'.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, 40% off Accenture will still give some of us fat profits.

  74. I've worked with Wipro and... by kahei · · Score: 1

    I don't have any opinions either way on the 'Oh No The Cheap Labor Is Coming' issue, but I have worked with Wipro quite a lot -- in fact I've worked for two large companies that outsourced large amounts of labor to Wipro.

    In both cases, the result was terrible -- Wipro sent out terribly nice and bright people with no knowledge of what they could expect in real world business at all, paid them nothing and treated them like medieval serfs.

    Naturally the quality of their work was somewhere between 'bad' and 'actually worse than if nobody had done it at all'. Not the fault of the programmers, just a natural result of the silly business model. By the time both companies learned what tasks could be given to Wipro and which ones couldn't, both companies had lost huge sums of money, both in fees paid to Wipro and in the various disasters caused by frightened Wipro serfs.

    What particularly struck me was the indifference Wipro showed to its own employees. On the other hand, I've also dealt with some semi-cheap labor outsourced from eastern europe and it worked out very well because the outsourcing company cared about what it was doing.

    The story is not 'Cheap countries benefit at expense of US!' so much as 'Nasty outsourcing companies benefit at the expense of everybody else, until people get wise to them!'

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    1. Re:I've worked with Wipro and... by WeirdKid · · Score: 1

      I've been immersed in Wiproans for the past several months, and instead of my job (as lead architect) becoming easier, it's become harder. We have to keep constant watch for the shortcuts they take, we spend hours upon hours helping them get their designs and their documentation to an acceptable level -- and even then we have to tell them to re-do things three or four times before they actually make any changes.

      Onsite work is bad enough, but the offshore work often ends up being immediately and completely "refactored" onsite by local talent. Oddly enough, it seems the time we spend scrambling to make things work added to the time and cost of having Wipro blunder through the first time still seems to be less than if local talent handled the entire project from the start.

      And it's not an "Indian thing", either. Most Indians I've worked with in my career have been very thoroughly educated, knowledgeable, and detail-oriented people -- and a hell of a lot friendlier than your average American Cowboy Coder. I just find it interesting that my company is unwilling to hire anyone with less than 8 years IT industry experience, but we'll take a Wipro contractor straight out the chute of some unknown third-world university where the students riot if they're not allowed to cheat on exams.

      Well, that may be a bit of an exaggeration, but it's funny.

    2. Re:I've worked with Wipro and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It takes far more design work when your giving a project to someone that has no clue vs someone that has a clue. Are you finding that you can't get away with poor specs when you send the work off shore where your local team would do what you mean, not what the spec said?

    3. Re:I've worked with Wipro and... by WeirdKid · · Score: 1

      Well, brave AC, if you had read and understood the post, you'd know that since we use Wipro for design and development it is they who are creating the poor specs that their own developers can't even follow. What's more, you have no idea what you are talking about, since Wipro's model is to have local folks that create the specs that get sent to their own developers offshore.

      I should add that we've never had an in-house design and development staff and that we've never seen such poor quality before. Nor have we had such a difficult time getting acceptable "specs" from a vendor before. I'll pick Deloitte, IBM, or any of the smaller boutique firms any day over this "offshore-by-proxy" arrangement.

  75. Where's the beef by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work with Wipro guys all the time at several large clients. On average, they are ok, but I have yet to run into anyone outstanding. They are a safe bet for large projects, but not a provider of top level talent from what I've seen.

  76. Re:USCM (freaking out) "That's IT, man, Game OVER! by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

    Additional thought:

    I've just thought of one more thing: some sectors which might have trouble outsourcing could be the utilities, telephone and cable companies, regional ISPs, etc... So a clever IT professional might be able to find good work in such an industry. Actually, a range of jobs will probably survive in all sectors like this. So that's cool too.

    It might not work out all that badly for us overall... It won't be the Great Depression again, maybe just depressing.

    Interesting note: the article mentioned that as education becomes more widespread in India and conditions there improve, companies like Wipro will probably end up outsourcing to even less expensive countries like Thailand because wages in India won't be cheap anymore! How's that for irony? Work for American companies will be handled by Indian companies which contract out to, say, Cambodian companies (which may in turn subcontract elsewhere). Amazing.

    --
    Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
  77. Wipro Has a Reputation for Quality by Lucas+Membrane · · Score: 1
    They are CMM level 5. That's the best you can get. CNA hired them after getting nowhere with firms from Texas, Connecticut, France, England, etc. They believed that they would get the best results with them, not the cheapest. Operating in a market that competes on price (term life insurance), CNA wants to be like Wipro -- an efficient, no-nonsense, highly-automated, high-volume, low-priced supplier.

    Over the past few decades, the life insurance business has lost nearly 10% of its companies and 3% of its headcount each year on account of corporate mergers, acquisitions, and consolidations. But the potential gains from technology and consolidation are harder to obtain now, so the headcount reduction will now be jobs shipped overseas, including software jobs. Most of the headcount for US insurance company 'home office' (ie neither sales nor claims work in the field) jobs will be offshore in about 10-15 years.

  78. More than just tech jobs, sustainable medicare by flyguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The thing that I found intertesting that I hadn't thought about is not the tech jobs going over seas but other jobs going over seas. If they can setup a computer software engineering center which can turn out code as good as the rest of the companies in the states what prevents them from creating a medical facility and training doctors who also work for cutthroat rates. If you can train people to be good at computer science in india I don't see why you can't train people to be good doctors, nurses, etc and cut medical costs down to the price of a plane ticket.

    If all high paying jobs are shipped over then the cost of what the high paying jobs were providing software, medicare, etc falls to the point where you don't need a high paying job to cover it. Just think, the biggest expense is medicare, if that is cut by not paying doctors $300K year then why do you need a high paying job.

    There are of course times when patients can't be flown to have an operation but in generally the most expensive procedure could be taken care of in an Indian medical facility with doctors trained at a North American level but costing a fraction.

    1. Re:More than just tech jobs, sustainable medicare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If they can setup a computer software engineering center which can turn out code as good as the rest of the companies in the states what prevents them from creating a medical facility and training doctors who also work for cutthroat rates.
      Actually, hospitals in South Africa and India _do_ advertise (discreetly) their low rates in the UK, mostly to the immigrant community. A big reason why this hasn't taken off more is because of 'human factors' -- the quality of care/face-to-face interaction needed in medicine is paramount, as is the need for a comfortable environment to get treated in. Also, medical laws very from country to country, especially malpractice laws -- that way the american system is very advanced (and lawsuit-happy)

      But yes, it's an interesting business model, would be interesting to see which countries succeed in this.
    2. Re:More than just tech jobs, sustainable medicare by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They can't ship doctor jobs to India for the same reason they can't pick up my local McDonald's and ship it to India and expect to get the same clientelle. As much as I like McDonald's french fries I am not going to Bangalore to get them. Most of the really expensive medical stuff is stuff you do in an emergency, and flying me to India when I need a triple bypass (due to massive french fry consumption, do doubt) is not likely to solve the problem for anyone but the insurance company. I will almost certainly die in transit and then the insurance company can save themselves the cost of the operation.

      On the other hand, I already know plenty of people that have gone to Canada for their laser eye surgery. However, with a little searching my wife was able to find a nearby U.S. doctor that had even better prices than were available in Canada.

    3. Re:More than just tech jobs, sustainable medicare by flyguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am not arguing that all medical operations could occur in a different country obviously there are factors that prevent that like as you mentioned emergency situations.

      But bypass surgury AFAIK is not usually done in emergency situation, it is a planned operation that is done usually as a result of the patient developing angina due to constriction of the blood vessels.

      Also although I haven't taken a look at the cost of all operations but I would think it to be just the opposite that the most expensive procedures are planned. Think heart transplant, bypass, surgury in general.

      Again it would depend whether there are restrictions on flying in each case but since it is a planned procedure you could fly to Indian have the operation and stay in a recovery room there for fractions of the cost.

      Another good example is cancer and kemotheraphy. You could fly down have the kemo and treatement and stay in a vactation type recovery place there until the major portions of the treatement are over.

    4. Re:More than just tech jobs, sustainable medicare by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      As someone who has lived outside the states I would certainly consider reputable non-U.S. doctors for non-emergency treatments. India, however, is quite a ways to go. Canada and Mexico would seem like much better choices.

    5. Re:More than just tech jobs, sustainable medicare by pinka · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Again it would depend whether there are restrictions on flying in each case but since it is a planned procedure you could fly to Indian have the operation and stay in a recovery room there for fractions of the cost.


      Indeed, this is what many britons started doing (fly to India on the start of some vacation time, and get planned surgery etc. there) I think the British Medical Society, in a move that sounded very similar to Prez. Bush's steel protectionism, objected strongly; but this isn't something that can be stopped very easily, particularly given the falling air fare

  79. Offshore software developmen by joshuakiyama · · Score: 1

    It seems that there has been comparisons made between textile manufacturing and steel manufacturing and the migration of jobs over seas.

    There have been many good points made on how this ultimately is better for the US and better for developing nations and believe to improve the economy over all.

    A few things that I felt needed to be pointed out regarding making comparisons between textile, steel and software development.

    The workers in textile mills were never considered middle class or even upper middle class. Most of the workers in textile mills lived in the slums. They didn't make middle class wages and there buying power was very low.Textile workers didn't have college degrees either, most didn't even have a primary school education. Also despite all the textiles being produced over seas. The best textiles come from Western Europe, US and Japan. Third world nations produce crap.

    Steel mill workers were paid better, but were by no means considered middle class. I have family members who worked in steel mills in the midwest and they didn't have the purchasing power of today's software developers in their day. Most steel workers may have a high school diploma and some have some technical training at a vocational school, but I would say most do not or ever had a college degree. And as for steel mills, most American steel mills went out of business, not because they moved the steel mills over seas, but rather Japanese steel mills could make better steel. And some of it cheaper, Japanese steel mill workers by the way make about the same as American Steel workers. Yet Japanese steel mills are still lit and pumping out steel. What happened to US steel ?

    Maybe some development can go over to India, but the wholesale movement to outsource everything to India or over seas is a serious threat to the US's ability to stay competitive in computer technology. There will be very little incentive for people to go into computer science, information systems, especially since most jobs are being over seas.

    Software development is being moved off-shore simply to fatten corporate executive's paychecks. After the accounting scandals and dot comedy insanity, I can't believe anyone trusts or believes that corporations will do the right thing. and pass the cost savings they make by off shoring development into R&D and advancement.

    I'm not a software engineer, but rather a system administraotr, still it's depressing to see so many well educated, talented people out of work, being forced to train some kid from over seas to do their job.

    I'm in an Oracle class and several people in the class are going through exactly that. It is so depressing.

    H1Bs is such a crock, the entire H1B and L1 visa situation needs to be revised. My previous company, a few of the developers were H1B visa holders and all of them were payed below industry norm, and for them it was nearly enslavement. My previous company did alot to abuse the H1Bs and the H1B visa program. And I'm sure that they are not unique in this.

    Unfortunately I don't have an answer... But something should be done, some protective measures should be made both for foriegn workers coming to the US and for US citizens/green card holders.

    Things do not bode well...

    1. Re:Offshore software developmen by pkphilip · · Score: 1

      The best textiles come from Western Europe, US and Japan. Third world nations produce crap.

      And on exactly what do you base this "finding"? Some of the best textiles in the world comes from countries like Egypt, China and India..

      Other stuff - many of the so-called Italian shoes (considered perhaps the best in the world) are actually made in India but branded in Italy and sold worldwide.. (Yes, I know a company which does this in India)

      A lot of work actually happens in the developing world - European and American companies design products but actually source these products from developing nations. These products are then put through quality control checks, branded and then sold worldwide (at a huge premium) as made in Europe or made in US stuff.

      What is happening now is these smaller companies which worked just as sweat shops are evolving their own marketing and branding strategies to sell their products directly in Europe and the US. This allows these companies to get a better profit for their work.

      Ofcourse, they will go through the same problems that many European and American firms have already tackled. These Asian companies have historically relied heavily on the European and American associates to design and market products for them. But now that they are going it alone, they will need to learn how to go about designing their products themselves.. how to do the Quality checks properly.. how to sell their services/products abroad etc.

      We can see the same pattern in IT as well -
      Indian software companies have primarily concentrated on selling services and not products. But now they are shifting tracks a bit - now more and more firms are looking at producing products.

  80. And I thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the Indians were all about casinos and tax-free smokes. Good for them, getting into IT.

  81. Send My Job Overseas? No Problem! by Glindonna · · Score: 1

    Hey, this is economic warfare, right? I'm just an over-priced, lazy American software engineer. I studied at your schools and worked at your companies but no more. Tough break for me.

    Except, here's the parting bombshell I'm dropping on your "globalization" party and giddy race to the bottom:

    Americans without jobs - or with crappy low-paying service jobs - don't buy cars, computers, cell phone or internet services, satellite televsion systems, PVRs, PDAs, HDTVs, homes or major applicances. You want me to live like a rat and to compete with slave labor in China? What can I do?, You might want to check your market share numbers in slave labor camps, though. And I wouldn't count on those "cheap Indian programmers" picking up the slack, either.

    You will never be able to make your junk cheap enough. Your markets will continue to shrink, your company to bleed, your conscience to nag at you as you try and hold it all together and justify your abject sleaziness to yourself and your family as you help destroy the social fabric of a once great nation. Tough break.

    Me? Hey, I'm destitute, I can't help ya buddy. I'll be couch-surfing and hanging out at the library 'til the revolution comes to finally burn your sorry "globalized" ass to the ground.

    Adios, and enjoy your moment in the sun. Really, enjoy! You've earned it. Bravo!

    Glin

    1. Re:Send My Job Overseas? No Problem! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I agree.. Where can I buy a copy of the soon
      to be bestseller..

      "The Race to the Bottom and How to be happy with
      Serfdom"

      How long will it take the great mass of Red Republicans in the hinterlands to understand that
      class warfare is a great American tradition, not
      something to be ashamed of.

      Anybody catch the PBS American Expierence documentary on "Chicago the city of the century"

      What will it take for history to repeat itself

  82. What goes around comes around by pkphilip · · Score: 1

    While it is true that Wipro and Infosys are benefiting from the fact that companies in the US are outsourcing work to them, it is also true that these larger indian companies, who are CMM certified, adhere by strict standards and therefore are required to invest heavily in software and hardware - most of these are sourced from the US.

    Incase you are wondering, Wipro and Infosys do NOT use pirated software. Incidentally, Wipro is one of the larger distributors of packaged software - they are distributors for Macromedia, Adobe, Borland and many other US based firms.

    It would be interesting to consider how much money is actually being spent by these Indian companies in purchasing software from the US. They also do purchase most of their hardware from companies like IBM, HP/Compaq and dell.

    So money does flow both ways though the amount of money flowing into these Indian companies is much larger.

    But the opposite is true for many other industries - For instance,India buys most of its planes from Boeing.. and some of them from Airbus..

  83. A detail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not all is so sky blue for Wipro as presented.

    Ericsson is company in steep decline right now and they are trying to rid as many development centers as possible.

    The Indian ones were simply sold to someone else (and this happened elsewhere and some were closed completely). Not much of new business as result - only the people and facilities.

  84. Prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As India becomes wealthier, Pakistan will become increasingly envious and resentful eventually nuking them.

  85. Wake up and smell the chai by Colonel+Panic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Experience has shown that 'shipping jobs overseas' actually CREATES more jobs here at home

    And what kind of jobs might those be this time? Starbucks? Burger King?

    I can kind of see your point when it comes to manufacturing jobs, but now that the 'thinking' jobs are leaving I'm not sure what'll be left for us to do . In the 80's as manufacturing jobs left the US many of those displaced workers were encouraged to get into software engineering since it paid better anyway. What should software engineers be studying now? Dentistry? Auto Mechanics? (at least those jobs can't be sent overseas)

    Software development isn't an incredibly difficult skill.. in particular the types of software development that is being shipped overseas.

    You're deluding yourself if you think that it's only the lower-end development jobs that are being sent overseas. Check this article
    . It's an interview with a venture capitalist about his take on where the Oregon economy is headed. Towards the end he talks about the impact of outsourcing engineering jobs and how that will slow the recovery in the high-tech sector. He talks about how Mentor Graphics is opening a $40million R&D center in India. When he asked them why, they told him: "they said they can't hire anyone graduating from engineering schools here because they're just not prepared, they're just not ready to go into that sophisticated end of the business." Now personally, I don't think that's the real reason (the real reason is that they can pay Indian engineers about 1/3 of what they pay their American counterparts) but that quote should be sending chills down the spine of every US developer who reads it.

    I have made it a strong point to become an expert in system architecture and design, and that has kept me very comfortably employed no matter the economic conditions. ...keep dreaming. Read the article that started this thread. India is moving into the high-end of the development process now. It's time we software engineers woke up and smelled the chai.

    1. Re:Wake up and smell the chai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps you meant darjeeling? Chai originates from Africa, but is really just a recent American health-store nut fad

  86. I'm a survivor of a WiPro wipeout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for a large US company, one of less than 30 people left after 200 development jobs were given to WiPro. NOT maintenance, but new product development. I survived because of skills as a system architect. But guess what? Those skill were developed in a 20 year software career. The kind of career that US workers have little chance of pursuing today.

    As to WiPro "quality". I have yet to see it. What I see is some pretty lame stuff.

    Regarding folks here who say "get used to it", trying telling that to my former co-workers as they try to meet the mortgage payments.

    What is a US worker to do? You have no leverage. Your employer makes decisions based on cost, not what you did, do, or might do in the future. I'd like to see some serious discussion about strategies individuals might pursue.

    (Ironically, the Indian-Americans at my company are more upset than native-born engineers. After all, they had the initiative to come here for a better life, only to see it being threatened by stay-at-home drones.)

    1. Re:I'm a survivor of a WiPro wipeout by pkphilip · · Score: 1

      It is normally assumed that those who chose to stay back in India were deficient in some way.

      Not true.

      Yes, my view is a little biased since I have stayed back. I chosed to stay back because I wanted to start a firm in India - I have since then done just that. Prior to that I worked in New Zealand, UK, and ofcourse the USA before deciding to return for good.

      There are lots of very good coders who have stayed back for reasons such as family, elderly parents and so on.

      Not all of us worship the almighty dollar.

  87. You must be young because... by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

    "I still don't get why people feared the Japanese in the 80s. They didn't work 18 hour days for $6k/year, even in the 80s."

    That's not what we were told by the press in the 80's. The Japanese had a will to win. We were told they were better trained, they had a much better work ethic, the wages were cheaper, and they worked harder.

    But come the end of the 90's and the beginning of the new century and the Japanese look the same as anybody else.

    I just think we're building Indian IT to be some 50 foot behemouth that can't be stopped. I think reality is probably less sensational.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    1. Re:You must be young because... by anonymousman77 · · Score: 1

      The only thing that will stop them is a war with Pakistan. Our own companies are selling us out to send moeny over there.

      You know, I've never had any prejudice toward anyone for any reason. Now when I hear about India or Indians, I just think "mushroom cloud". Is this what globalization does to people?

      I hope you're right and I hope someday I'll share your optimism.

    2. Re:You must be young because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >You know, I've never had any prejudice toward anyone for any reason.

      >India - Could be in a nuclear conflict with Pakistan tomorrow.

      >Now when I hear about India or Indians, I just think "mushroom cloud".

      I hate to say this, but I honestly wished a few months ago when push was coming to shove over there that there had been a massive nuclear exchange. I wanted sooo bad to have all the data centers that US companies were building over there be destroyed - I wanted that so bad I could taste it.

      Nothing would make me happier than to see all the American companies that are building massive multi-million dollar tech centers in India lose 100% of their investments over there, bust their frigging butts.

    3. Re:You must be young because... by anonymousman77 · · Score: 1

      I'm with you, cowardboy... I wouldn't want anyone to be hurt, mind you, just all of the buildings vaporized.

      That would have taught those a-holes a lesson, eh?

      Glad I'm not the only person who feels this way about it.

  88. Jack Welch on Wipro... by Queelix · · Score: 1

    From the box at on the upper right of the Wipro web site we learn...

    "From the first day in dealing with Wipro, there's been nothing but quality, character, highest integrity, highest quality work"

    No one knows more about character and integrity than Jack Welch.

    Sincerely,

    That Harvard Business Review wench Jack was banging behind his wife's back.

    1. Re:Jack Welch on Wipro... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm let's see here...

      Jack Welch

      Dave Cote

      Jack Welch

      Dave Cote

      oh hell, I dunno who would have been a bigger asshole to work for... But, I Guess I'm stuck with Dave Cote..

      -Stuck in HoneyHell....

  89. You can't move fast enough forever by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    What makes you think a financial job can't be outsourced? There's already talk of outsourcing paralegal work. You send the US legal books over to India, and pay an Indian, Indian wages to do the legal research.

    Your trying to tell me that the same can't be done in the financial sector? Dell has already setup Indian call centers and given the operators American sounding names.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  90. Outsourcing turned my town around.. by xtal · · Score: 1

    I live in Canada.. I'm not very affected by trends in software development per se. That's one of the reasons I did EE instead of CS.. programming just isn't that complicated at the application level. That worked out reasonably well. The biggest point I want to make is is the low dollar relative to the US, and the fact that most Canadians are more or less culturally the same as their US counterparts. So companies don't get shocked too bad.

    The biggest trend though here is companies like EDS setting up HUGE new callcenter facilities. These places pay $10-12 or more an hour (Canadian), or about $6/hr US. That's a lot of money around here. You can buy a nice house for $50-60k cdn if you shop around. There's huge savings in Salary right there. EDS gets well educated people for that - often university educated. That's not heard of in the USA right now.

    So.. here's to outsourcing. If the US wants to maintain it's very high standard of living and powerful economy, then they have to get production and productivity up. That's the flip side of global trade. Cheap goods in the short term, but you have to maintain your advantage in the long.

    --
    ..don't panic
  91. Nice Doomsday Scenario by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    Is this what happened after textile jobs, manufacturing jobs, and automaking jobs were sent overseas? No? It isn't? Then why would it happen now with mere tech jobs?

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    1. Re:Nice Doomsday Scenario by Glindonna · · Score: 1

      Hey, you're right bro. Chenge will never come. Because we all know the trend in America is towards more equitable distribution of welath -- oops, oh, dang. I mean, it's not as if globalization talks cause rioting or anything -- er. I mean, i's not as if countries are electing left wing governments because peole have had enough -- er... Yeah, sleep tight pal, ninety-eight percent of America will gladly suffer any level of degrading misery heaped on them to keep the opulent two percent in Prada. Don't worry. It will never happen. The bill will never come due. Enjoy. Enjoy. Glin

    2. Re:Nice Doomsday Scenario by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well when those "manufacturing" jobs went "over there". What did the displaced worker do, and were did he go? Quite a few went out and reeducated themselves, and got themselves those "tech jobs". Jobs just like the previous jobs that payed enough to buy those nice geek gadgets, and other nice things. Now returning to the present. The cycle is repeating and the "tech" jobs are going "over there". Were is the displaced worker going, and doing? It's the service sectors turn isn't it? Couple problems though. One those kind of jobs are traditionly of a lower pay, and worst working conditions. Two some of those jobs are going "over there" as well. Three the resource pool aka "jobs" is already small from the treatment from the 80's decimation of manufacturing, and the present and future treatment will make it even smaller. Do you know what happens to an economy that has more workers than jobs? If we're fortunate a lot of the "excess" will throw themselves off a balcony, or bridge and maybe give a spurt to the funeral industry, but I doubt it. Face it, sooner or later we're going to be the McDonalds for the rest of the world, and the financial clout to match. We have an education system that's broken. A government that doesn't give a damn. Businesses that are literally minicountrys that can't see beyound their noses. With the cost of things we do need going up, and things we really don't cratering. Oh and let's throw in a needless war to boot.

  92. It's good for everybody by OS390 · · Score: 1

    Trends like this help weed out the crappy workers who leech off of a booming industry like IT. Competition fuels innovation, plus the more America outsources it's menial labor, we will be able to put the saved capitol into R&D. Sooner or later Indians, Asians, and Latin Americans will get of being the world's janitor. Then they will have the equavalent of the labor riots America had in and around the turn of the 20th century. Maybe one day all countries will be on a level playing field, and then we really get to see who's smarter than who.

  93. Please by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    Jack Welch's affair has absolutely no bearing on his performance as an executive. His leadership at GE is unparrelled. I couldn't care less about his personal problems. The Indians aren't hiring him to tech them all how to be good husbands. They need him to teach them how to be good businessmen.

    He still is the greatest CEO that ever lived.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    1. Re:Please by Queelix · · Score: 1

      Was Jack a good CEO? Maybe.

      Should Jack's affairs and the details of severance be held against him as a business person? Maybe not. I don't know.

      Do I trust Jack as a judge of 'character' and 'integrity'? No.

      A company that puts him on their web site with those words as an endorsement needs to have its corporate head examined. Once someone becomes the butt of jokes on late night TV chances are this is not the guy for an endorsement deal.

      Q out...

  94. Time to wake up and smell the chai by Colonel+Panic · · Score: 1

    The replies to this article mostly seem to run in two veins:
    "Those Indian engineers can do OK with the low-end, simple development tasks that we don't want to do anyway."

    and

    "My job is safe because I'm at the highend architectural level ... blah, blah"

    The first type of reply smacks of some sort of racism that tends to think that no other country can be as good at software development as the US so we don't have to worry about the 'good' jobs leaving. The second type is just naieve.

    Sure it _was_ the lowerlevel software jobs that were being sent over to India at first, but now that's changing and we'd better be ready for this change... It essentially means that even after this recession ends and the economy is doing well again that it will still be difficult for sofware engineers (and hardware engineers too, those jobs are starting to go overseas as well) to find jobs.
    Why? Because the jobs that are being sent over now will lead to more of the same as companies find that they can significantly cut their costs. In the 'global economy' if you're being paid significantly more than your employer could pay someone somewhere else to do the job (and just as well) then it's only a matter of time... and this is especially true of engineering jobs which are much easier to 'export' than manufacturing jobs were (no equipment or materials to move).

    A couple of weeks ago a local paper interviewed
    a local venture capitalist and asked him where he thought the Oregon economy was headed. His analysis is actually pretty good... he focuses on outsourcing of engineering jobs and how that will slow the recovery in the high-tech sector. He then gives the example of Mentor Graphics and how they're going to invest $40million in a R&D center in India. When he asked them why they were going to do this, they told him: "they said they can't hire anyone graduating from engineering schools here because they're just not prepared, they're just not ready to go into that sophisticated end of the business." Now of course I think their reply is disingenuous - in the current economy they could find plenty of engineers to staff their R&D center if they built it here, but that's beside the point. The point is that here is a company that's going to move some of the 'sophisticated' engineering jobs over to India.

    Another data point: This past summer I did a contract job at Intel. I've kept in contact with the people I worked with there and I've asked several times if they'll be hiring again and of course the reply is always that there's a hiring freeze. Last week I had lunch with one of these guys and he told me that he'd like to hire me again but they can't do any hiring in the US and then added "But if you were in India, we're hiring over there".

    1. Re:Time to wake up and smell the chai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats bullshit. I'm Indian, and i'm writing this from India. My room-mate is working for Intel, but the catch is that they haven't taken him as an employee. He's a "consultant", on contract for 6 months. After that, he's kicked out.

      Easy going for Intel, no strings attached. But its a bit hard on the "consultant"

  95. Econ for Idiots by RealAlaskan · · Score: 1
    ... the "rich world" will eventually give away so much work that they will be poor.

    Wow. Let's play this one out a little closer to home. Chicago should never have sent all those highpaying meatpacking jobs out to Omaha. That's why Chicago is poor. Even closer to home: are you letting your wife wash the dishes? Don't you realize that's taking away work that you could be doing? She's impoverishing you!

    If we carry the argument against international trade to its ultimate, we conclude that everyone should produce everything for himself, and never trade with anyone. Obviously that's goofy.

    There's something wrong with your argument; let me help you identify the problem. When we send those coding jobs overseas, we make it possible for the Indians to buy goods and services from us. The reason that makes us all better off is that we only send them the work that they have a comparitive advantage in. That means that we can do something more profitable here. More free trade (NOT subsidised trade, such as Japan practiced for many years) enriches the entire world.

    The classic old example is that England COULD make wine, and Spain COULD make wool, but each country has a natural advantage at making the other, and both are better off trading. This is absolute advantage, and is easy to understand.

    Here's an example of comparitive advantage. There is a lawyer who can type 100 words per minute, and prepare a case in one hour. He hires, to do the typing, a legal secretary who can type 50 wpm, but would need 10 hours to prepare a case. Why? Because the secretary has a comparitive advantage in typing, even though he is only half as fast at typing. This is comparitive advantage, and is a bit more subtle.

    The secretary faces this trade off: in a 10 hour day, he can type 30,000 characters, or can prep one case. The lawyer's trade off is: type 60,000 characters (only twice as much as the secretary), or prep 10 cases (10 times more than the secretary!). They're both better off to trade services this way, even though the secretary has no absolute advantage in anything.

    The situation with international trade is similar. We can give the Indians work that we are better off letting them do, even if they aren't as good at it as we are. Both we and they are better off. There will always be something for us to do, even if we are worse at everything than the Indians. We will always be better off trading freely, even if we are in the position of the slow secretary rather than the fast lawyer.

    I realize that this is hard on the people with little education and inflexible minds whose jobs dry up here. They won't enjoy being retrained, but I don't see why my children should live in relative poverty so they can keep on slacking. I don't see why Indian children should live in real poverty to make things easier for them, either.

    What a lot of programmers fail to realize is that programming is the 21st century equivalent of ditch digging. No, it's worse than that, because you don't even have to be fully grown. A preteen can do most coding. There's a reason that we call them code monkeys.

    If your job doesn't require a graduate degree and a track record of proven creative ability, you are probably a commodity, and you should expect to see foreign competition, and quite possibly loose your career to it.

    1. Re:Econ for Idiots by LibertineR · · Score: 1
      Dude, If I had anymore mod points, you would surely get them. WELL DONE!. I am so sick of these whining code monkeys complaining about competition, when they ought to be taking their time improving their skills.

      I dont mean their PROGRAMMING skills either. I mean their MARKETING SKILLS. I am a .NET Architect. I turn down more work in a week, than I could complete in a year. Why? Because in addition to being a competent architect, I know how to market my skills to the people ready and willing to PAY MONEY for them.

      Anyone who is BETTER THAN AVERAGE these days is STUPID to be ANYONE's EMPLOYEE!!! Work for yourself, by yourself, for many companies, and get paid for your ability, and stop depending upon some employer to keep your ass working.

      These whiners need to get good enough to not mind a little competition, learn to market your abilities, learn public speaking, put down the twinkies, fat boys and get out there!

      But above all else, they need to stop bitching. Why work for one company when you can work for 10 companies at once? If you dont have a code library developed over the years, ready to plug into many projects at once, then get your ass of Slashdot, and get busy!

      Losers.

    2. Re:Econ for Idiots by Rasputin · · Score: 1
      Wow. Let's play this one out a little closer to home. Chicago should never have sent all those highpaying meatpacking jobs out to Omaha. That's why Chicago is poor. Even closer to home: are you letting your wife wash the dishes? Don't you realize that's taking away work that you could be doing? She's impoverishing you!

      Nice bit of reductio ad absurdum reasoning. Surely there must have be a valid argument you could have used instead.

      --
      "I once preached peaceful coexistence with Windows. You may laugh at my expense - I deserve it." Be's Jean-Louis Gass
  96. Re:lol... by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    Give it time. When Indians learn that they can ship off older useless relatives who do nothing but drag/hold them down, the nursing home construction boom in India will break all known records in human existence.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  97. a comment on Fast Company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, yes -- Fast Company, the magazine for clueless, jackass MBAs with no creativity or strategic vision. They rely on rags like this to spot "trends." This is one trend that's clearly been spotted, so watch out -- pretty soon you'll have companies spending $ to outsource *single* positions so that they can "be like Jack (Welch)."

  98. C'est La Vie... by jasno · · Score: 1

    While I have to admit stuff like this scares my socks off, its a reality of globalizaton which also gives us 99 cent TV sets at Wal-mart. It will be a rough few years, especially for the less skilled among us.

    Now if we really want to stop it, just start shipping our upper/middle management over there. They effectively killed productivity at my former employer, and I'm sure they could work the same magic in India.

    --

    http://www.masturbateforpeace.com/
  99. This is how WIPRO works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for a large corporation with manufacturing plants all over the United States. Handed down from the powers that be we must accept and begin to use WIPRO resources. They have been here for almost 4 months now and we have lost 3 of our experienced developers and a large chunk of knowledge base within the company. We have systems that were once stable that are now barely functioning because they lack business knowledge and use "temporary solutions" to resolve the problems. WIPRO reminds me of the school nurse. They can put a band-aid over a wound to make it quite bleeding but because they don't have enought business knowledge they cannot fix the real problem. This leaves systems that need constant attention and repair. Even when a resource begins to understand what they are doing they are shipped back to India and a new resource is brought in to add more damage. Now we have a plant full of end users and business analysts who have lost all faith in the support of our department. This is causing them to go back to the stone age and record all work in Excel spreadsheets and paper. Thus workflow has been tremendously impacted and morale is at an all time low. This is the story we are seeing with the cheaper alternative.
    The one thing I don't understand is if the United States Government can tax imported products why can't it tax companies who choose to import services. Those of you who say that it is our duty to help out those countries that are less fortunate....I think you should go there and help them out. Meanwhile quit starving our economy for people who wouldn't help you if they could.

  100. Re:USCM (freaking out) "That's IT, man, Game OVER! by Dasein · · Score: 1

    I think you hit the nail on the head. A lot of us have considered technology the great equalizer but didn't stop to think that we're living above the norm so "equalization" means loss.

    But, you correctly point out that as demand for cheap labor increases, the labor becomes not quite as cheap. Hence the sort of "rolling" equalization that you describe.

    I think that false economies abound in such a scenario but, hey, why not give it a try?

    --
    You are not a beautiful or unique snowflake -- but you could be if you got off your ass.
  101. The sun has set on the Age of Geeks (in US) by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    How many farmers are there in the US now as a percentage of the population compared to a century ago? Is the country richer or poorer now? Standards of living have gone up over the last 50 years, despite the auto industry moving overseas.

    In the 1950's factory workers earned a lot more than McD jobs now (relative speaking), which is where all the work is now for the similarly educated.

    Globalization favors management and marketing jobs over tech and physical work. If you have a nack for management, you will be better off. If not, SOL.

    The sun has set on the Age of Geeks (in the US).

    1. Re:The sun has set on the Age of Geeks (in US) by Ominous+Armed+Cow · · Score: 1

      Who are the managers going to manage when there jobs are just as portable/disposable?

      The article makes it quite clear that Wipro intends to push this way. What would stop them, or anyone for that matter?

    2. Re:The sun has set on the Age of Geeks (in US) by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Who are the managers going to manage when there jobs are just as portable/disposable?

      The higher up the corporate hierarchy you go, the more social issues play a part. Thus, a physical person is desirable to those types.

  102. I would suggest checking that condescension. by Featureless · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It doesn't look like you read the article - and you obviously haven't been there, or seen it for yourself. While there may be some basis for your economic theory, your notions about the difficulty of system architecture and design making you valuable enough to keep living in the 1st world are utterly mistaken. You (and I) will have to change careers, or move to the 3rd world ourselves, within 15 years. I virtually guarantee it.

    In addition, due to other unrelated macroeconomic and political factors, it's getting much harder to "start over" here. Conservative politics and rising higher-educational costs might seem unimportant now, but people always find themselves thinking differently when they land back down at the bottom of the ladder.

    As for America as a whole, when in a few more years we find ourselves really on the rocks and try to turn to our vaunted "education and high-skill manpower," we will discover we have neither - the price of the broom-fucking we've given public education (at all levels) over the past 3 decades.

    Good luck.

  103. 80s hysterics was RIGHT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is very reminiscient of the "Godzilla has arrived" mania that swept the US back in the 1980s. Mayne serious people then believed that Japan was going to buy the US (in cash) and then enslave us all in their Toyota factories. We know now how wrong they were.

    Because Godzilla moved to China and killed US manufacturing jobs *anyhow*. We just got the country wrong, that's all.

  104. What about India as a market? by rleibman · · Score: 1
    I'm surprised nobody has mentioned this
    The higher the number of pepole using computers around the world the bigger our market as engineers. 1 Billion people increasing their technical capabilities is an OPPORTUNITY, we can make it a problem by sitting back and stopping where we are and allowing other countries to improve. Short term we may hurt, but long term:
    • Salaries in India and salaries here will tend to globalize
    • Many more people around the world will need the services of capable engineers
    • Eventually, and governments permitting, the world economy will be better off than that of the U.S. at its peak (IOW profit!)
    But if you want to do the typical modern american thing and bitch, go ahead, I'm willing to compete and take your seat.
    The only people who should fear competition are the incompetent
  105. Please God Please ... by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

    Dear Santa,
    I have been a very good programmer all year. I pre-declared all of my variables, didn't use too many globals, created classes that used inheritance whereever possible and used descriptive variable names in all of my programs. I helped optimize a friend's sorting routine and didn't pirate any software (that wasn't written by Microsoft.)

    All I want for Christmas (a little late is ok, but get it done) is a massive nuclear exchange between India and the Paki's.

    Your friend,
    Glonoinha

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  106. No, you *wish* it was ridiculous. by Featureless · · Score: 1

    You obviously have no idea how much of the software you use was written in India. Almost every major American software company has outsourced or established offices there.

    The two objections I always hear to their eventual dominance that I can think of off the top of my head are:

    1) They're not as good, and
    2) They're too far away - pitfalls of distributed development, communication problems, etc.

    The first is, more or less, a bunch of ignorant (I'll stop short of saying racist) BS, and the 2nd can't account for anywhere near the kind of trouble that a 75% discount can't overcome - or even a 20% discount for that matter.

    The reality is that software engineering is by far the most ideal candidate for 3rd world outsourcing to date - because there are no transportation costs, and no real possibility to tax or tariff the "product" as it travels over borders.

    You have your opinion, and I have mine (whether I like it or not): if you're a software developer planning on living in the 1st world, your world is ending.

  107. Re:Grammar and spelling at work by Glonoinha · · Score: 2, Funny

    *true
    *In fact
    *of the dot com boom
    *its chairman, Azim Premji, was
    *software companies, but if you
    *USD, it's not that (or it is not that)
    *That's how (or That is how)
    *That's going to
    *I don't think
    *is going to stop
    *emerging
    *this could be

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  108. You want harsh reality? Try this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm willing to kill for my standard of living.
    Forget your Randian-myth economy;
    It doesn't acknowledge the harsh reality:
    if the current "social contract" isn't working,
    I am perfectly willing to pursue
    alternate methods of behaviour to get what I want.
    It's not a matter of money or markets,
    it's just that if I get desperate enough,
    I don't much care about what happens to the rest of the world.

  109. abnormal brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Abby's brain was perfectly normal.

    I knew her brother "the shark", Greg Normal.

  110. Re:You want harsh reality? Try this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm willing to kill for my standard of living. Forget your Randian-myth economy; It doesn't acknowledge the harsh reality: if the current "social contract" isn't working, I am perfectly willing to pursue alternate methods of behaviour to get what I want. It's not a matter of money or markets, it's just that if I get desperate enough, I don't much care about what happens to the rest of the world.

    Bless you, Anonymous Coward. I wish everyone was as honest as you are. Kill, steal, whatever. As long as you get what you want.

    That's a nice look inside your soul, you pathetic little piece of shit.

    GF.

  111. 80s hysterics?-Call Centers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "People have made this argument for years, and, lo and behold, the U.S. is doing just dandy, thank you. Many jobs are service related (health care, legal, entertainment, financial, etc.) and cannot be shipped overseas. "Service jobs" do not mean just "hamburger flipping" despite what your local union boss/thug may have told you."

    Dandy is a very relative term.And yes some service jobs can be shipped overseas. Technology has made that much easier, just as it has made the present topic of discussion possible.

  112. Indian Code Sucks by Threed · · Score: 1

    Device drivers slapped together, crap that barely works, apps that look like they were made in VB v1.0, no documentation... The US hardware company that contracts out to India for drivers or utilities is begging for trouble. They get into contractual arrangements, can't back out, and are forced to ship crappy code for otherwise decent hardware. Who loses? ME, on all counts! I could have written my own drivers / apps if the hardware wasn't closed. I could have been hired by the US hardware company to do the drivers if they weren't outsourcing jobs to 5-buck-a-day code-sweatshops. I could have bought a working product if they'd hired an American! They could fix the problems in their products if they had on-site programmers that understood the code.

    Yeah I'm flamin' (and I got karma to burn), but I just bought a POS product (that I can't otherwise comment on) that I've been trying to get working for 2 weeks... Only to find out that no new software will be forthcoming because it was written in India. It'd go back to the store if there wasn't an Open Source driver project in the works - but you can bet I'll never buy anything from the US company until they stop contracting with the Indian slop artists.

  113. Don't lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I wanted to start a firm in India "

    Indians are the "Ferrengi" of the earth. Mostly in physical attributes.

    But I digress. Indians aren't good coders; they're meek, mild people who will do as they're told, which makes them great as coders, and bad as system developers.

    I say this as a brother to you, figuratively. The indian people are the nicest, kindest people on earth, but there are some aspects to our society that are annoying and this is but one of them.

  114. Need Slashdot India section!! by charmer · · Score: 1

    With so many stories in the recent weeks on slashdot about India, we should have a separate section for India, with an icon as India's map (http://www.mapsofindia.com).

  115. I don't think you realise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just how smart these guys are.

    I've spoken to Wipro (including Ganesh mentioned in the article) on a number of occasions and the staff are right on the money in the problem space.

    I was pretty sceptical about talking to them originally, but I am yet to meet another company that that has as good appreciation of the architecture and realitites of creating n-tier enterprise solutions.

    Just my $.02

  116. Level of abstraction by jtra · · Score: 1
    You usually have to go to real code to actually implement methods, but using a RAD tool to layout your GUI, a CASE tool to do all the object defintions and database connectivity, only writing code by hand when you have to, is a very productive way to work. Programming Swing or Motif or MFC is very repetitive and can be highly automated, as can writing wrapper code for database tables to present them cleanly to objects.

    Oh, wrong! That means that you don't have enough level of abstraction. You suggest the use of tools, that generate code for you --- that's right, move the hard work to the machines, but you don't necessarily need to use graphical language. Programming is about algorithms and abstractions. If your favourite language does not support this abstraction, it is wrong for this problem.

    Now, if you want to say "But another level of abstraction will make it slow!" you still don't have right language! Good language can expand inline (like lisp macros) your abstractions so they look as a plain code you would write in inferior language.

    Use right tools for the problem.

    --
    -- Wanna textmode user interface for ruby? http://freshmeat.net/projects/jttui/
  117. Not so long ago by nerdin · · Score: 1

    People complained about H1B, now jobs are going abroad with NO control at all.
    How Americans will compete against same professional-level people that work at 80% discount?

  118. No, I _KNOW_ it's ridiculous by ergo98 · · Score: 1

    You obviously have no idea how much of the software you use was written in India. Almost every major American software company has outsourced or established offices there.

    This is just ridiculous. Very little (I would estimate Claims that some outrageous portion of it was birthed in India is just ridiculous. I will fully agree that Indians living in the West contributed...of course they have...but the idea that the Indian tech community is anything more than a TINY blip in the global village is just ridiculous.

    and the 2nd can't account for anywhere near the kind of trouble that a 75% discount can't overcome - or even a 20% discount for that matter.

    Absolutely ridiculous. Firstly software development is not, and has never been a cost driven field: How else do you think it gets by as an industry with 80% or higher profit margins? The only reason that any organizations right now are looking to relocate to India is simple: A desperate last move in tough tech times. These were the same firms that were paying $150K during the height (which was an opposite form of desperation). It's management justifying themselves by doing something.

    Under-estimating communication issues is unbelievably ridiculous as well. Have you ever worked in software development? I suspect not because in real world development the client seldom comes with a "This is what I want in nicely documented form, and I'll see you in 6 months when you deliver", but rather almost all real-world development processes are Agile development style processes (whether formally defined as such or not) where there is a constant bantering between the various development groups and the "customer". Hell, you're trying to claim that communications AROUND THE GLOBE with a people who often speak different languages under completely different laws is no big deal yet most companies still don't even allow telecommuting. What sort of dream world are you living in?

    The reality is that software engineering is by far the most ideal candidate for 3rd world outsourcing to date - because there are no transportation costs, and no real possibility to tax or tariff the "product" as it travels over borders.

    Exactly as you've mentioned, software development has always been an excellent candidate for world trade: The programmers of India, like anyone else, have always had the ability to create the next Photoshop or Windows. Of course, as you know, they haven't, and the only reason at all that this whole movement gets any support whatsoever is because it's the latest wave of self-justification by layers of HR and upper management. When the tech upturn begins it'll be forgotten into the ether.

    Secondly, computer science is one of the most educated fields out there: Saying that it's the most "ideal candidate for 3rd world outsourcing" is just ridiculous in that context. The outsourcing to India is basically occurring to the "Island of the First World", it isn't occurring to some unwashed masses. Education, as you know, is one of the great divisions between the first and third world. Of course the salary in the Indian tech community has ramped up steadily and will quickly reach Western norms.

    if you're a software developer planning on living in the 1st world, your world is ending.

    Why limit your paranoid extrapolations to just software development? Why not just say "Any intelligence work is going to the 3rd world". Drug research, architecture, electronics engineering, etc. Let's make this even more dramatic shall we?

    1. Re:No, I _KNOW_ it's ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah I forgot to close an italics tag. I shoulda got someone in Bangalore to write this post for me.

  119. Brilliant... by Ominous+Armed+Cow · · Score: 1

    So, architecture is a high level skill? Maybe you ought to actually RTFA.

    Software is easy? Haahahaha. Spoken like a true bodyshop jockey. That must be why geniuses like you who profess the benefits of "software engineering" (i.e: methodology to make idiots look good at following methodology) produces soooo many successful projects. 1/3rd of mid to large size software projects never complete, of the remaining 2/3rds, 2/3rds of them are badly overbudget, out of schedule, and fail to meet the agreed upon criteria. Wow, that some track record. Maybe you should concentrate on world peace next.

  120. HomeEcon for Condescending idiots... by Ominous+Armed+Cow · · Score: 1

    A worker gets paid $100 dollars and hour.
    He's replaced by two workers in India who make $3 per hour. He then gets a job at Starbucks for $7 per hour, or he doesn't because fifty of his peers got their first.

    How many stereo's will the First worker buy for Christmas? How many stereos (made in the USA) will the two workers in India be buying at the local black market for Diswali?

    And the U.S. Stereo worker gets:
    a) a bonus because sales are so good.
    b) laid off
    c) doesn't exist, because he became your first worker ten years ago when the factory moved to Mexico.

    Starbucks closes because noone spends $4.00 on a cup of hot flavored water in the middle of a depression.

    Where did you go wrong:
    First off, you seem to think that software coding is manufacturing, when in fact it is a skill which requires constant retraining. (i.e., a knowledge worker.)

    Secondly, lawyers don't produce, they feed off of a successful economy, or an unsuccessful one if they practice bankruptcy law.

    Thirdly, the things you mention can all be moved easily. The incentive to do so only grows when the rest of the "manufacturing" process is already overseas, and the developers do better with an native management team.

    Fourth, I am sure you will claim that "somebody's got to sell the goods to the Americans. Who are out of work because every a critical mass of their knowledge jobs was exportable.

  121. Perfect code? That is a falacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no such thing as perfect code.

  122. fat paycheck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the bankers and managers who have sold out the American Engineers are the ones who live the lifestyle that you talk about.

    These are the people whos jobs should be done away with.

  123. you are a bigot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad you don't know any real Americans.
    Do you think we all think that you are stupid and lazy?

    No, you are envious and jealous.

    WE are the ones paying to protect you asses from the muslim hoards while you all sit back and get fat.

    Most Americans don't want 'globalization' but it is shuffed down our throats by the 'global leadership class' who have sold us out.

    Free trade is very expensive. We want fairness not envious highborn foriegn elites who LOVE to see us fall.

    Why do you think we left the old world? Because it was run by money mongering sots.

    screw you.

  124. Re:Comparing to Japan: Wipro results for the quart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Wipro Results for the Quarter ended December 2002 under Consolidated Indian GAAP
    Wipro's Revenue grows 27% year on year Sequential growth in pricing and volume lead to 10% Revenue growth in Global IT business Wipro Limited today announced its audited results approved by the Board of Directors for the quarter ended December 2002.
    Highlights of results:
    • Revenue for the quarter was Rs. 11 billion, an increase of 27% year on year and Profit After Tax for the quarter was Rs. 2.3 billion, an increase of 3% year on year. Revenue[1] from continuing operations for the nine-month period was Rs. 31 billion. Profit After Tax[2] for the nine-month period was Rs.6.4 billion.
    • Wipro Technologies Revenue for the quarter increased 23% year on year to Rs.7.45 billion.
    • Wipro Technologies Profit Before Interest and Tax (PBIT) at Rs.2.1 billion was 29% of Revenue.
    • 24 new customers added in Global IT Services during the quarter, including 5 that are on the Fortune 1000 list.
    • Wipro Spectramind recorded Revenue of Rs. 564 million and PBIT of Rs. 140 million, which is 25% of Revenue.
    Acquisitions:
    • Completed the acquisition of the remaining outstanding shares of Wipro Spectramind Services Ltd.
    • Closed the acquisition of the Global Energy practice of AMS, Inc. The financial results from this practice will be consolidated beginning with our results for the quarter ending March 31, 2003.
    • Entered into definitive agreements to purchase the assets related to the two Research & Development centers of Ericsson India Pvt Ltd at Bangalore and Hyderabad and the Research & Development center of EHPT India Pvt Ltd at Delhi. Employment offers made to 291 employees currently employed in these three centers. The transaction is expected to close in January, 2003. Concurrently, Ericsson AB has signed an agreement for purchase of consultancy services from Wipro for an amount of $17 million up to calendar year 2004.
    • Acquired a 40% equity share of Wipro Healthcare Information Technologies Ltd. (formerly GE Medical Systems Information Technologies Ltd.) held by Citadel Healthcare Ltd. for Rs. 97 million ($2 million). Upon closing, Wipro Healthcare Information Technologies Ltd. will be a wholly-owned subsidiary

      Outlook for the Quarter ending March 31, 2003:
      Azim Premji, Chairman of Wipro commenting on the results for the quarter said "We see sustained volume growth with prices stabilizing in IT services and growing volumes and with intense price competition in the IT Enabled services. Our 10% sequential revenue growth in Global IT services business was the result of an 8% volume growth and a 2% increase in price realizations. In the IT Enabled services segment, intense price competition resulted in Revenues of $11.6 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2002 against our estimate of approximately $12.5 million. Enhanced operational efficiency contributed to a 4% increase in Operating Margin to Revenue of 25%, negating the 4% decline in price realization that we saw during the quarter in this segment.
      For the quarter ended March 2003, we estimate the Revenue in our Global IT Services business to be approximately $162 million, in Wipro Spectramind to be approximately $12 million and in Wipro HealthScience at approximately $2.5 million."

      Vivek Paul, Vice Chairman and CEO of Wipro Technologies, our Global IT Services business said "Our Enterprise business which contributes 62% of our IT Services Revenue grew sequentially by 14%, reflecting the strong value proposition of domain based business solutions to our clients. Our Technology business grew 4% sequentially reflecting our technical depth and commitment to our Technology customers who continue to experience economic and business pressure.
      In the environment of intense price pressure in IT enabled services space, our operational excellence and experience continues to provide us with a compelling competitive advantage."

      http://www.wipro.com/
  125. Six Sigma proves something. by twitter · · Score: 1
    While I don't doubt the ability of people around the world to write software, that little blurb only proves this company was involved in some high level bull shit. Of course, those who do are those who know. Certs have been discussed ad nauseum here, and few people have respect for them.

    Six Sigma is some kind of formalized screw up analysis process of the kind only highly regulated and industries could love. When you see that, you know all involved are clueless. Got your "black belt" yet? Eye glazing is an understatement.

    It's easy to find a project manager willing to praise his project to the stars, deserved or not.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  126. Only true if the US does not wake up. by twitter · · Score: 1

    There is one way to stop the hemorage of US money and fix this: free software. Think about it, much of this programing is closed source waste and duplication. They are solving the same problems over and over again. No money is saved, even at 1/4 price, if you have to buy it eight times. Just remember that as this practice has been going up, IT budgets have also been rising. Free software could stop this hemorage of US currency and put you back to work. It's not the software that matters, it's knowing how to use it to get something done. Of course, in a free software world, we won't have to think of our fellow programers as "competition" any more, but as our peers and friends. There 15,000 "technologists" could be doing better work at home too. I'd like to see more of them designing semi-conductor masks than rewriting comercial applications for big stupid US companies.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  127. I got bad news and good news. by twitter · · Score: 1
    You think that Utilities won't discover "outsourcing". Wrong - it's already happened as they focused on "core business." I worked for a large Utility operations company and they had fired most of their IT folks a few year back, saying "we're a generating company, not a software company." It was really brain dead because their in house staff had developed wonderful custom software that worked very well. It cost them $5 million. Now they are buying a $10 million package to replace it that's doomed to failure because it's being built by clueless upper management types who talk about things like Six Sigma and what not.

    You then predict:

    First, the outsourcing trend is going to worsen. Corporate America is going to increasingly ship its IT work overseas to companies like Wipro. Mostly this is because corporate America is greedy, short-sighted, and fairly stupid, and has absolutely no problem with skewering the economy and destroying the middle class if they can squeeze a little more profit out of the system in the short term.

    I say it is entirely possible that corporate America will not stay clueless forever and will discover, free software. This will end the wasteful duplication of closed source software and indeed require local talent to oversee and develop. Those in corporate America who move in that direction first will realize many savings.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:I got bad news and good news. by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      Twitter said: "I say it is entirely possible that corporate America will not stay clueless forever and will discover, free software. This will end the wasteful duplication of closed source software and indeed require local talent to oversee and develop. Those in corporate America who move in that direction first will realize many savings."

      Hang on a minute. I said that corporate America is greedy, short-sighted and stupid. I didn't say clueless, and I didn't say anything about open source. I wholly agree with you that corporate America is going to latch onto open source. I think they're going to cling to it like a swollen leech, because they'll perceive it as a way of breaking out of Microsoft licensing agreements and whatnot -- it's about money for them, and always has been. Stability and security are nice, but when's the last time you met a manager who understood these things in any depth?

      However, this has NOTHING to do with outsourcing. If anything, open source makes outsourcing much easier, because they can hire outsourcing companies to handle all their open source modifications, and they don't have to worry about negotiating with any software companies for rights. And, as far as requiring "local talent" to oversee and develop, I've never seen a company hire ANYONE permanantly to develop software. They hire consultants (usually from outsourcing companies like Wipro) to build out their systems, then maintain them. You're missing the whole dynamic here.

      This is coming. There's nothing we can do about it. And, those of us who prepare for it by going heavily local will have a serious head start when the shoe drops.

      As far as utility companies go, well, so much for THAT idea. Thanks for the heads up. On the other hand, you can make some pretty decent money by becoming a technician for a utility. My brother in law works for ConEd, and he's doing pretty well. Of course, his beat is down in the Bronx, and the utility tunnels he works in are really, really old and strange places -- he's seen rats as big as small dogs, and walls moving, where upon shining his lamp on them, tens of millions of cockroaches freaked out and ran in every direction! He said they're inches deep, like a river of bugs. Still -- it beats flipping burgers, and kind of hard to outsource!

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
  128. Government pays for health care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get over it guy. Taxes there are cheap becoz their gov doesnt doesnt pay them for being unemployed. And no, their gov doesnt pay for their health care too.

  129. A river in Egypt by Featureless · · Score: 1

    Contradictory, incoherent... and you're utterly wrong on pretty much all points. This is your classic "desperation argument." But I won't take any joy when you realize it.

    1. Re:A river in Egypt by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Wow, what a stunning rebuttal. Well let me simplify my response to yours to ignorant, self-justifying (I'll guess that you're unemployed. The unemployed generally will worst-case scenario the world around them to justify and explain their position), paranoid, and utterly inane. The core of your argument is that computer science, a field which requires a large degree of education, can most easily be transplated to "3rd world nations", a status that generally indicates "no education".

  130. More correctly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It means that they hired consultants to produce a heavy procedural document that they claim meets a set of pre-established criteria.

    What ACTUALLY HAPPENS on the project will more likely look as though the Three Stooges were in charge.

    Please note that said consultants aren't going to get paid if they make the company work too hard, so, what you'll see in practice are tems of consultants with a "canned" prcedure up their sleeve - just a few editing changes and boom, SEL CMM Level .

    I have worked in a purported "Level 5" place, and when I saw how amateurishly work was actually conducted, I looked into the CMM business and determined that in reality we operated at Level 1, Level 0, and even sometimes at the unofficially-defined Level -1.

    It was interesting to be making this discovery while also learning how Open Source development gets done. People WHO JUST PLAIN WANT TO were coming up with ReiserFS and Zope and all kinds of other things, and somehow they were capable of doing incredible things and well - things that not only took coding skill but abstract design thought and a lot of it.

  131. But what about technical education? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    You may be producing bunches of innovators (debatable, because many students to the elite US Universities come from abroad), managers, CEOS but you may not be producing enough good technicians.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  132. Poor chappy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't be afraid, it will not hurt much.
    Do you know what kind of software is the one more actively developed? You should know: inhouse development. Yes, internal applications that never will see the outside world.

    Well, guess what, here where I work (big bank, think really big) at least a quarter of our developpers come fron India. Also many internal applications are developped locally over there, you will never see those in the "commercial software arena".

    1. Re:Poor chappy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the point was that true innovation and skill is demonstrated when a group pulls independantly contributes, such as suddenly coming out with "WiPro 2000 Automated Systems Management" that takes the world by storm. This has NOT happened, which indicates that the workforce is the subpar programmers, much like many of the subpar programmers who inhabit the offices of the big banks. I am hardly worried anymore than Airbus is worried that a big Indian aerospace company is going to crop up: The truly good software developers generally migrate to the first world, leaving the monkeys behind to let CEOs pretend that they're making progress.

  133. I'm sorry, by Featureless · · Score: 1

    it's jsut that you didn't justify anything more. I notice you repeated one of your more glaring racist fallacies again, which is that India can't handle teaching its people CS.

    BTW, quite employed. In fact, judging by your level of intelligence, I bet I make a lot more than you do.

    1. Re:I'm sorry, by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      I notice you repeated one of your more glaring racist fallacies again

      The ignorant and defeated always resort to attempts at diminishing their opponent on faux moral grounds. Hilarious (Let me guess: I'm "worse than Hitler", right? Goodwins law always comes into play with morons such as yourself.) What an excellent example.

      In any case, I find your cries of "racist!" to be a riot (not to mention pointing out how much of an idiotic moron that you are). Since when has "race" been a part of this my ignorant friend? India is a third world nation with limited infrastructure and education: This pretty much defines what a third world nation is (otherwise they wouldn't be a third world nation. This is something that you so stunningly miss in your claims of doom for the engineering community that it boggles the mind. Are there small numbers of educated people who are great software developers in India? Absolutely! Are they better than programmers around the world, which people such as yourself (in a hilariously contradictory racism) propose? Absolutely not. Is there astronomically greater numbers of programmers with many more years experience, with a better infrastructure and better conditions in many countries around the world? Of course there is.

      You also, like all morons, presume that it's all a zero sum game: Their gain equals our loss. Ignore the fact that billions come right back to North American engineering as they start buying planes, trains and automobiles as that probably hurts your little brain.

      BTW, quite employed. In fact, judging by your level of intelligence, I bet I make a lot more than you do.

      Bwahahaha, the old "my paycheque is bigger than your paycheque" routine. You're unemployed and living in your parents basement, and I am virtually certain of that. My point about being unemployed or not relates to the fact that the unemployed are most likely to spread doom and gloom as they paint he world with their own situation.

  134. Indians vs Americans by thomn8r · · Score: 1

    In any population, you have good examples and bad examples, whether it's a crop of apples or programmers. There are good Indian programmers and there are shitty ones, just like there's good American programmers and shitty ones. The fundamental difference is almost all of the India programmers are dirt cheap. Don't argue with me in terms of ROI or quality - straight dollar-for-dollar, they're cheap. Management will use cheap Indian talent for the same reason most people buy crappy tools rather than pony up the big bucks for Snap-On or Mac tools. They still work.

    Now foreach (accountant, administrator,customer-support) { s/programmer/$_/g; } and you'll see the larger problem - it's more than just IT stuff that's going over. HP recently moved an accounting group to India. Some companies moved their phone support ops over there years ago; they even go so far as to give the India workers American alter-egos so people stateside don't know the difference.

    The 90's saw the importation of 1000's of H1's - they were cheaper, so it was worthwhile to import them, fsck the locals. But what you didn't know, is that HP, Oracle, M$, FedEx, etc were building up the infrastructure over *there*. A company I worked for in the 90's was working with BFL; BFL talked them into shipping 100+ sun workstations and servers, along with switches and routers, to their compound in Bangalore. Not only that, but I had to *train* them in how to run the stuff, and baby-sit them remotely. But now that they're equipped and trained, companies now don't have to expend the cost of a plane ticket and an immigration lawyer. I personally know H1's here that are losing their jobs because their projects are moving to India!

    HP's upper management has made it *very* clear in the press that they're moving everything they can to India. Sun, Oracle, M$ and the rest are right there with 'em.

    The "there's not enough educated Americans" was and is a smoke screen to justify the H1-B program. The H1's are still coming in at a phenomenal rate, while the unemployment rate for IT folx is in the solid double digits. If the tables were the other way around, and massive amounts of non-Americans were being thrown on the street, the ACLU would be on a murderous rampage.

    Some apologists claim "a rising tide lifts all boats" and bringing India into the 1st world will benefit Americans. The only Americans it benefits are the Fiorinas', Gates', McNealy's and Ellison's. The claim is that the rising prosperity of these countries will allow them to buy more American goods. Riiiight - which American goods? The ones made in Taiwan/China/#include ? Furthermore, since we're exported all the know-how as well, there's nothing to keep them from setting up shop and making and selling their own crap to their own people, cutting the American companies out of the loop altogether.

    So what does this mean to us in the IT world, or better yet, the country as a whole? In short, we're fsck'd. We ate our seed corn. Corporate America sold our intellectual and technological leverage, so a chosen few could reap tens of millions in salaries and bonuses. The shareholders, for whom it was all supposed to be for (like 'for the children') didn't even do that well in the end. All of the good jobs for middle America are gone. The only thing left that hasn't been hollowed out is the legal profession; even doctors and nurses are being imported by profit-hungry HMO CEO's

    Honestly, we were better off when India was just something you thought of when you saw poor starving children on Sally Struthers' infomercials.

    And to the head-in-the-sand apologists who say "you're not in any danger if you keep your skills current" - I counter that you're now competing on *price* with a low-cost one-trick pony. Not to mention the 4-figure mortgage.

  135. White Collars Turn Blue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    White Collars Turn Blue
    by Paul Krugman

    Interesting essay worth reading about this topic.

  136. It's not "faux" racism by Featureless · · Score: 1

    It's quite real. Why? It's obvious you know nothing about India - you've never been there and you've never dealt with them. But don't take my word for it. Why don't you print out your posts and ask some people from that country what they think? :)

    Aw, did I make you upset by not flattering your "thoughts" with an enumerated response? So ironic; your urine-stream of invective is not the demeanor of someone secure in their beliefs or sanguine about the issues. :)

    I'm sure you'll have no trouble finding work in the American factories where they make planes, trains and automobiles.

    1. Re:It's not "faux" racism by ergo98 · · Score: 0, Troll

      MAN THE BATTLE STATIONS: THE 3RD WORLD IS COMING!

      How ironic that you attempt to portray me as a racism when my point all along was that software development in India is fundamentally a "first world in the third world" (as small crust of highly educated in a small area with a good infrastructure), and that rather than pulling us down they're pulling themselves up. Here comes you screaming racist while at the same time portraying them as whoring yokels by the masses who'll take the whips to undercut North America. Take some history lessons and learn about the rise of Japan.

      OH GOD IT'S ALL OVER PEOPLE! IT'S IN REVELATIONS!

  137. Heh by Featureless · · Score: 1

    So much childish frustration. What is it, ergo98? Stress in the workplace? Haven't had sex in years? Or ever?

    Go on, get it all out. It will make you feel better.

    1. Re:Heh by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Hoooah. You, sir, are a friggin' riot! Bwahahahaha.

      You are a last worder though so please feel free to follow this up with some other pathetic revision on the history of this conversation.

  138. Re:Grammar and spelling at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks. So, can you speak Hindi?

  139. "Bwahahahaha." by Featureless · · Score: 1

    Oh man. I knew I was done for when you put the the "Bw" in front of your long string of "haha's". You totally schooled me, ergo98.

    Oh no - I replied again! I've justified your devilish "last word" insult! Oh woe as me. If only any of it would make me wrong.

    Speaking of revisionism, I'm amazed you never gloated about how your Indian friends totally validated your comments as not being racist and ignorant. I'm waiting - I know you'll get to that one soon.

  140. That's an easy question by alizard · · Score: 1
    If your product is intended for a mass market, development costs are spread over hundreds of thousands or millions of units. The end user difference in cost between a product developed by $100K/year people and $10K/year people shouldn't be all that important.

    Particularly if the low-wage people didn't quite get the specifications right or small differences in language made a very big difference in understanding or even timezone differences, i.e. only one team functioning when inter-group communication is needed... and large chunks have to be done over at the last minute by really expensive ubergeek consultants. These kinds of problems don't tend to wind up in the business press, but most of us have probably heard from someone who's seen this firsthand.

    Even in the area of production, rememember that whether the product is software or hardware, if it's high-tech, we aren't supposed to have people building things unit-by-unit, people are supposed to be supervising production machinery, i.e. an hourly labor rate for a worker is supposed to be spread over dozens or hundreds or thousands of units per hour. If this isn't true, either the product or process is in need of redesign, low-wage sweatshops are simply ways of covering up managerial bungling, preferring to hire lots of cheap labor at what's often a higher total cost than to hire high-skill high wage people to do it right at what should be an equal (all costs considered) or lower or perhaps much lower price.

    Would you rather hire 100 people at $1 to dig a ditch or 1 guy with a bulldozer? Yes, that guy's hourly rate might be more than $1/hour. You may now hide under the bed after hearing that.

    When I say all costs, remember the price of defective product that's either bounced at the plant or returned by consumers.

    Personally, I think that outsourcing is just another management fad and that the smartest companies which will wind up coming out ahead will stay home and cut costs with more efficiency and better technology. Of course, by the time this becomes obvious, the US may not have a programmer community to take advantage of it.

    I'm not saying there aren't many good programmers in India, I'm saying that they should be building their own products and selling them on the world market competing against the rest of the world.

  141. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    When you have 200 programmers trying to write code for one
    product, like Win95 or NT, what you get is a multipule personality
    program. By definition, the real problem is that these programs are
    psychotic by nature and make people crazy when they use them.
    -- Joan Brewer on alt.destroy.microsoft

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...